UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended: February 2, 2008January 31, 2009
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from: __________________________ to __________________________
Commission file number: 000-20969
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organizationorganization) | 20-8159608 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
451 Industrial Lane, Birmingham, Alabama 35211
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
205-942-4292
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share | | NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC |
| Title of Class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: | NONE |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
| | Yes | X | | No | o
| |
| |
| Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | X | | Accelerated filer | o |
| | | | | |
| Non-accelerated filer | o | | Smaller reporting company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for purposes of this calculation that all executive officers and directors are “affiliates”) was $737,818,499$591,176,198 on August 3, 2007,2, 2008, based on the closing sale price of $23.7220.77 at August 3, 20072, 2008 for the Common Stockcommon stock on such date on the NASDAQ NationalGlobal Select Market.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock,common stock, as of March 28, 200827, 2009 was 28,401,206.28,560,404.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans called for in Item 5Portions of Part II and the information called for in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III are incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitiveRegistrant's Proxy Statement for the 20082009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 2, 2008.May 28, 2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 24, 2008.27, 2009.
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC.
| | | | Page | | | Page |
| | | | | | |
| Item | 1. | | 5 | 1. | | 5 |
| Item | 1A. | | 9 | 1A. | | 9 |
| Item | 1B. | | 13 | 1B. | | 13 |
| Item | 2. | | 13 | 2. | | 13 |
| Item | 3. | | 13 | 3. | | 14 |
| Item | 4. | | 14 | 4. | | 14 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Item | 5. | | 15 | 5. | | 15 |
| Item | 6. | | 18 | 6. | | 17 |
| Item | 7. | | 19 | 7. | | 18 |
| Item | 7A. | | 27 | 7A. | | 27 |
| Item | 8. | | 28 | 8. | | 28 |
| Item | 9. | | 51 | 9. | | 48 |
| Item | 9A. | | 51 | 9A. | | 48 |
| Item | 9B. | | 51 | 9B. | | 49 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Item | 10. | | 52 | 10. | | 50 |
| Item | 11. | | 52 | 11. | | 50 |
| Item | 12. | | 52 | 12. | | 50 |
| Item | 13. | | 52 | 13. | | 50 |
| Item | 14. | | 52 | 14. | | 50 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Item | 15. | | 53 | 15. | | 51 |
| | | | 55 | | | 53 |
| | | | | | | |
A warning about Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements address future events, developments and results. They include statements preceded by, followed by or including words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “target” or “estimate.” For example, our forward-looking statements include statements regarding:
| | · | our anticipated sales, including comparable store net sales changes, net sales growth and earnings; |
| | · | our growth, including our plans to add, expand or relocate stores and square footage growth, our market’smarkets’ ability to support such growth and the suitability of our distribution facilities; |
| | · | the possible effect of pending legal actions and other contingencies; |
| | · | our cash needs, including our ability to fund our future capital expenditures and working capital requirements; |
| | · | our ability and plans to renew or increase our revolving credit facilities; |
| | · | our seasonal sales patterns and assumptions concerning customer buying behavior; |
| | · | our expectations regarding competition; |
| | · | our ability to renew or replace store leases satisfactorily; |
| | · | our estimates and assumptions as they relate to preferable tax and financial accounting methods, accruals, inventory valuations, dividends, carrying amount and liquidity of financial instruments and fair value of options and other stock-based compensation as well as our estimates of economic and useful lives of depreciable assets and leases; |
| | · | our expectations concerning future stock-based award types; |
| | · | our expectations concerning employee stock option exercise behavior; |
| | · | the possible effect of inflation, market decline and other economic changes on our costs and profitability;profitability, including the impact of changes in fuel costs and a downturn in the retail industry or changes in levels of store traffic; |
| · | the possible effects of continued volatility and further deterioration of the capital markets, the commercial and consumer credit environment and the continuation of lowered levels of consumer spending resulting from the global economic downturn, lowered levels of consumer confidence and higher levels of unemployment; |
| | · | our analyses of trends as related to earnings performance; |
| | · | our target market presence and its expected impact on our sales growth; |
| | · | our expectations concerning vendor level purchases and related discounts; |
| | · | our estimates and assumptions related to income tax liabilities and uncertain tax positions; |
| | · | the future reliability of, and cost associated with, our sources of supply, particularly imported goods; and |
| | · | the possible effect of recent accounting pronouncements. |
You should assume that the information appearing in this annual report is accurate only as of the date it was issued. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
For a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our future events, developments or results, you should carefully review the “Risk Factors” described beginning on page 9, as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 19.18.
Our forward-looking statements could be wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future events, developments or results described in this report could turn out to be materially different. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report and you should not expect us to do so.
Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts and others, we do not, by policy, selectively disclose to them any material nonpublicnon-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst regardless of the content of the statement or report. We do not, by policy, confirm forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.
Introductory Note
Unless specifically indicated otherwise, any reference to “2010” or “Fiscal 2010” relates to our year ending January 30, 2010. Any reference to “2009” or “Fiscal 2009” relates to our year endingended January 31, 2009. Any reference to “2008” or “Fiscal 2008” relates to our year endingended February 2, 2008. Any reference to “2007” or “Fiscal 2007” relates to our year ended February 3, 2007. Any reference to “2006” or “Fiscal 2006” relates to our year ended January 28, 2006.
Our Company
Our Company was originally organized in 1945 under the name Dixie Supply Company in Florence, Alabama, in the marine and small aircraft business. In 1951, the Company started targeting school athletic programs in North Alabama and by the end of the 1950’s had developed a profitable team sales business. In 1960, we sold the marine portion of our business and have been solely in the athleticsporting goods business since that time. In 1965, we opened Dyess & Hibbett Sporting Goods in Huntsville, Alabama, and hired Mickey Newsome, our current Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The next year, we opened another sporting goods store in Birmingham and by the end of 1980, we had stores operating in 12 locationsstores in central and northwest Alabama with a distribution center located in Birmingham and our central accounting office in Florence. We went public in October 1996 when we had 79 stores and were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware as Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. We incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware as Hibbett Sports, Inc. in January 2007 and on February 10, 2007, Hibbett Sports, Inc. became the successor holding company for Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc., which is now our operating subsidiary.
Today, we are a rapidly-growing operator of sporting goods stores in small to mid-sized markets predominantly in the Sunbelt,Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest.Midwest regions of the United States. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we operated 666723 Hibbett Sports stores as well as 18 smaller-format Sports Additions athletic shoe stores and 4 larger-format Sports & Co. superstores in 2324 states. Over the past two fiscal years, we have increased the number of stores from 549613 stores to 688745 stores, an increase in store base of approximately 25%22%. Our primary retail format and growth vehicle is Hibbett Sports, a 5,000 square foot store located primarily in strip centers which are usually anchoredinfluenced by a Wal-Mart store and in enclosed malls.
Although competitors in some markets may carry similar product lines and national brands as our stores, we believe that our stores are typically the primary sporting goods retailers in their markets due to the extensive selection of quality branded merchandise and high level of customer service. Hibbett’s merchandise assortment emphasizes team sports complemented by localized apparel and accessories designed to appeal to a wide range of customers within each individual market.
Available Information
The Company maintains an Internet website at the following address: www.hibbett.com.
We make available free of charge on or through our website under the heading “Investor Information,” certain reports that we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K. We make this information available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with or furnish it to the SEC. In addition to accessing copies of our reports online, you may request a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, at no charge, by writing to: Investor Relations, Hibbett Sports, Inc., 451 Industrial Lane, Birmingham, Alabama 35211.
Reports filed with or furnished to the SEC are also available free of charge upon request by contacting our corporate office at (205) 942-4292.
The public may also read or copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information may be obtained on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically at www.sec.gov.
Our Business Strategy
We target markets with county populations that range from 30,000 to 100,000. By targeting these smaller markets, we believe that we achieve important strategic advantages, including many expansion opportunities, comparatively low operating costs and a more limited competitive environment than generally faced in larger markets. In addition, we establish greater customer and vendor recognition as the leading sporting goods retailer in these local communities.
We believe our ability to merchandise to local sporting and community interests differentiates us from our national competitors. This strong regional focus also enables us to achieve significant cost benefits including lower corporate expenses, reduced distribution costs and increased economies of scale from marketing activities. Additionally, we also use sophisticated information systems to maintain tight controls over inventory and operating costs and continually search for ways to improve efficiencies through information system upgrades, such as the JDA Merchandising System we implemented beginning February 4, 2007.upgrades.
We strive to hire enthusiastic sales personnelpeople with an interest in sports. Our extensive training program focuses on product knowledge and selling skills and is conducted through the use of in-store clinics, videos, self-study courses, interactive group discussions and “Hibbett University” designed specifically for store management.
Our Store Concepts
Hibbett Sports
Our primary retail format is Hibbett Sports, a 5,000 square foot store located primarily in strip centers which are usually anchoredinfluenced by a Wal-Mart store andor in enclosed malls. In considering locations for our Hibbett Sports stores, we take into account the size, demographics and competitive conditions of each market. Of these stores, 461524 Hibbett Sports stores are located in strip centers with the remaining 205199 stores located in enclosed malls, the majority of which are the only enclosed malls in the county.
Hibbett Sports stores offer a core selection of quality, brand name merchandise with an emphasis on team sports. This merchandise mix is complemented by a selection of localized apparel and accessories designed to appeal to a wide range of customers within each market. We strive to respond quickly to major sporting events of local interest. Such events in Fiscal 20082009 included the LSU Tiger’sFlorida Gator’s victory in the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) national championship game as well as the successful seasons of the Dallas CowboysTennessee Titans and Jacksonville Jaguars and the enthusiasm surrounding Nick Saban’s return to collegiate coaching at the University of Alabama.
Sports Additions
Our 18 Sports Additions stores are small, mall-based stores, averaging 2,500 square feet with approximately 90% of merchandise consisting of athletic footwear and the remainder consisting of caps and a limited assortment of apparel. Sports Additions stores offer a broader assortment of athletic footwear, with a greater emphasis on fashion than the athletic footwear assortment offered by our Hibbett Sports stores. All but 4 Sports Additions stores are currently located in malls in which Hibbett Sports stores are also present.
Sports & Co.
We opened 4 Sports & Co. superstores between March 1995 and September 1996. Sports & Co. superstores average 25,000 square feet and offer a broader assortment of athletic footwear, apparel and equipment than our Hibbett Sports stores. Athletic equipment and apparel represent a higher percentage of the overall merchandise mix at Sports & Co. superstores than they do at Hibbett Sports stores. Sports & Co. superstores are designed to project the same in-store atmosphere as our Hibbett Sports stores but on a larger scale. We have no plans to open any superstores in the future.
Team Sales
Hibbett Team Sales, Inc. (Team Sales), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a leading supplier of customized athletic apparel, equipment and footwear to school, athletic and youth programs primarily in Alabama. Team Sales sells its merchandise directly to educational institutions and youth associations. The operations of Team Sales are independent of the operations of our retail stores. Team Sales does not meet the quantitative or qualitative reporting requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”)(FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)(SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.”
Our Expansion Strategy
In Fiscal 1994, we began to accelerate our rate of new store openings to take advantage of the growth opportunities in our target markets. We have currently identified over 350 potential markets for future Hibbett Sports stores generally within the states in which we operate. Our clustered expansion program, which calls for opening new stores within a two-hour driving distance of an existing Hibbett location, allows us to take advantage of efficiencies in distribution, marketing and regional management. We believe our current distribution center can support over 1,0001,200 stores.
In Fiscal 2009,2010, we plan to open approximately 8565 to 70 new stores and close 1020 to 25 stores while we will also remodel and expand approximately 1020 stores we feel have significant additional sales potential. This growth plan represents a decline over our historical store opening rates. While we are openingexpect to continue to expand, we have found it more difficult in the current economic environment and particularly in the commercial real estate market, to get our stores year over year, the percentage increase will decline slightly from last year’sopen at our historical rate of 12%.growth.
In evaluating potential markets, we consider population, economic conditions, local competitive dynamics, availability of suitable real estate and proximity to existing Hibbett Stores.stores. Our continued growth largely depends uponon our ability to open new stores in a timely manner, to operate them profitably and to manage them effectively. Additionally, successful expansion is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. See “Risk Factors.”
Our Distribution
We maintain a single 220,000 square foot distribution center in Birmingham, Alabama, which services our existing stores. The distribution process is centrally managed from our corporate headquarters, which is located in the same building as the distribution center. We believe strong distribution support for our stores is a critical element of our expansion strategy and is central to our ability to maintain a low cost operating structure.
Previously, we discussed plans to open a second distribution center in or around Dallas, Texas in Fiscal 2008. However,In addition, we have secured additional warehousing space in Birmingham for new store merchandise accumulation and have made an additional investment in our current distribution center that we believe will support our anticipated growth over the next few years primarily in the states we currently operate. Because of the additional warehousing space and investment in our current distribution center coupled with improved technology and vendor assistance with cross-docking, we believe we can service over 1,0001,200 stores with our current infrastructure in Birmingham.
We receive substantially all of our merchandise at our distribution center. For key products, we maintain backstock at the distribution center that is allocated and distributed to stores through an automatic replenishment program based on items that are sold. Merchandise is typically delivered to stores weekly via Company-operated vehicles.
Our Merchandising Strategy
Our merchandising strategy is to provide a broad assortment of quality brand name footwear, athletic equipment, and apparel at competitive prices in a full service environment. Historically, as well as for Fiscal 2008,2009, our most popular consumer item is athletic footwear, followed by performance and fashion apparel and team sports equipment, ranked according to sales.
We believe that the breadth and depth of our brand name merchandise selection generally exceeds the merchandise selection carried by local independent competitors. Many of these branded products are highly technical and require considerable sales assistance. We coordinate with our vendors to educate the sales staff at the store level on new products and trends.
Although the core merchandise assortment tends to be similar for each Hibbett Sports store, important local or regional differences frequently exist. Accordingly, our stores regularly offer products that reflect preferences for particular sporting activities in each community and local interests in college and professional sports teams. Our knowledge of these interests, combined with access to leading vendors, enables our stores to react quickly to emerging trends or special events, such as college or professional championships.
Our merchandising staff, operations staff and management analyze current sporting goods trends primarily through the gathering and analyzing of detail daily sales activity available through point-of-sale terminals located in the stores. We also visit Hibbett and competitor store locations, maintain close relationships with vendors and other retailers, monitor product selection at competing stores, communicate with district and store managers and review industry trade publications in an effortOther strategic measures we utilize to recognize trends. trends or changes in our industry include:
| · | studying other retailers for best practices in merchandising; |
| · | attending various trade shows, both in our industry and outside as well as reviewing industry trade publications; |
| · | staying active in industry associations such as the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA); |
| · | visiting competitor store locations; |
| · | monitoring product selection at competing stores; |
| · | maintaining close relationships with vendors and other retailers; and |
| · | communicating with our regional vice presidents, district managers and store managers. |
The merchandising staff works closely with store personnel to meet the requirements of individual stores for appropriate merchandise in sufficient quantities.
Our success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to changing merchandise trends and consumer demand on a store level in a timely manner. See “Risk Factors.”
Our Vendor Relationships
The sporting goods retail business is very brand name driven. Accordingly, we maintain relationships with a number of well knownwell-known sporting goods vendors to satisfy customer demand. We believe that our stores are among the primary retail distribution avenues for brand name vendors that seek to penetrate our target markets. As a result, we are able to attract considerable vendor interest and establish long-term partnerships with vendors. As our vendors expand their product lines and grow in popularity, we expand sales and promotions of these products within our stores. In addition, as we continue to increase our store base and enter new markets, our vendors increase their brand presence within these regions. We also emphasize and work with our vendors to establish favorable pricing and to receive cooperative marketing funds. We believe that we maintain good working relationships with our vendors. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, Nike, our largest vendor, represented approximately 51.4% of our total purchases while our next largest vendor represented approximately 8.4% of our total purchases. For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008, Nike, our largest vendor, represented approximately 48.5% of our total purchases while our next largest vendor represented approximately 9.3% of our total purchases. For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, Nike, our largest vendor, represented approximately 47.3% of our total purchases while our next largest vendor represented approximately 9.4% of our total purchases.
The loss of key vendor support could be detrimental to our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe that we have long-standing and strong relationships with our vendors and that we have adequate sources of brand name merchandise on competitive terms; however, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to acquire such merchandise at competitive prices or on competitive terms in the future. In this regard, certain merchandise that is high profile and in high demand may be allocated by vendors based upon the vendors’ internal criterion, which is beyond our control. See “Risk Factors.” Our Advertising and Promotion
We target special advertising opportunities in our markets to increase the effectiveness of our advertising budget. In particular, we prefer advertising in local media as a way to further differentiate Hibbett from national chain competitors. Substantially all of our advertising and promotional spending is centrally directed. Print advertising, including direct mail catalogs and postcards to customers, serves as the foundation of our promotional program and accounted for the majority of our total advertising costs in Fiscal 2008. 2009.
Other advertising means, such as television commercials, outdoor billboards, Hibbett trucks, our MVP loyalty program and the Hibbett website, are used to reinforce Hibbett’s name recognition and brand awareness in the community. Our internet marketing program, featuring our MVP loyalty program, has provided an expanded customer database that helps us target the specific needs of our customers. By allowing us to reach and interact with our customers on a regular basis through e-mail, this marketing effort is quickly becoming the most efficient, timely and targeted segment of our marketing program.
Our Competition
The business in which we are engaged is highly competitive. Many of the items we offer in our stores are also sold by local sporting goods stores, athletic footwear and other specialty athletic stores, traditional shoe stores and national and regional sporting goods stores. The marketplace for sporting goods remains highly fragmented as many different retailers compete for market share by utilizing a variety of store formats and merchandising strategies. In recent years, there has been significant consolidation of large format retailers in large metropolitan markets. However, we believe the competitive environment for sporting goods remains different in smaller markets where retail demand may not support larger format stores. In such markets as those targeted by Hibbett, national chains compete by focusing on a specialty category like athletic footwear.
Our stores compete with national chains that focus on athletic footwear, local sporting goods stores, department and discount stores, traditional shoe stores and mass merchandisers. On a limited basis, we are also seeinghave competition from national sporting goods chains in some of our mid-sized markets. Although we face competition from a variety of competitors, including on-line competitors, we believe that our stores are able to compete effectively by being distinguished as sporting goods stores emphasizing team sports and fitness merchandise complemented by a selection of localized apparel and accessories. Our competitors may carry similar product lines and national brands, but we believe the principal competitive factors for all of our stores are service, breadth of merchandise offered, availability of brand names and availability of local merchandise. We believe we compete favorably with respect to these factors in the smaller markets predominantly in the Sunbelt,Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest regions of the lower Midwest.United States. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to continue to compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Expansion into markets served by our competitors, entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets, could be detrimental to our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Risk Factors.”
Our Trademarks
Our Company, by and through subsidiaries, is the owner or licensee of trademarks that are very important to our business. For the most part, trademarks are valid as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly maintained. Registrations of trademarks can generally be renewed indefinitely as long as the trademarks are in use.
Following is a list of active trademarks registered and owned by the Company:
| | · | Hibbett Sports, Registration No. 2717584 |
| | · | Sports Additions, Registration No. 1767761 |
| | · | Hibbett, Registration No. 789234413275037 |
Our Employees
As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we employed approximately 1,9002,000 full-time and approximately 3,500 part-time employees, none of whom are represented by a labor union. The number of part-time employees fluctuates depending on seasonal needs. We cannot guarantee that our employees will not, in the future, elect to be represented by a union. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good and have not experienced significant interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements.
Employee Development. We develop our training programs in a continuing effort to service the needs of our customers and employees. These programs are designed to increase employee knowledge and include video training in all stores for the latest in technical detail of new products and new operational and service techniques. Because we primarily promote or relocate current employees to serve as managers for new stores, training and assessment of our employees is essential to our sustained growth.
We have implemented programs in our stores and corporate offices to ensure that we hire and promote the most qualified employees in a non-discriminatory way. One of the most significant programs we have is Hibbett University or “Hibbett U” which is an intensive, four dayfour-day training session held at our corporate offices and designed specifically for store management.
Seasonality
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and results of operations. Customer buying patterns around the spring sales period and the holiday season historically result in higher first and fourth quarter net sales. In addition, our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing of new store openings, the amount and timing of net sales contributed by new stores, merchandise mix and demand for apparel and accessories driven by local interest in sporting events.
You should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information contained in this report, before investing in shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment.
An extended downturn in the economy could affect consumer purchases of discretionary items, which could reduce our net sales.
In general, our sales represent discretionary spending by our customers. A further slowdown in the U.S. economy or other economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, inflation, business conditions, fuel and energy costs, consumer debt levels, lack of available credit, interest rates and tax rates may adversely affect our business. A reduction in overall consumer spending which causes customers to shift their spending to products other than those sold by us or to products sold by us that are less profitable could result in lower net sales, decreases in inventory turnover or a reduction in profitability due to lower margins.
Increasing volatility in financial markets or additional governmental regulations could cause a greater frequency or higher magnitude of change in many of the factors listed. At this time, we are unable to determine the impact on our customers and our business, if any, of programs adopted by the U.S. government to stabilize and support the economy.
We may be unable to achieve our expansion plans for future growth.
We have grown rapidly primarily through opening new stores, growing from 67 stores at the beginning of fiscal yearFiscal 1997 to 688745 stores at February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009. We plan to increase our store base by opening 8565 to 70 new Hibbett Sports stores while closing 1020 to 25 stores in Fiscal 2009.2010. Our continued growth depends, in large part, upon our ability to open new stores in a timely manner and to operate them profitably. Additionally, successfulSuccessful expansion is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In order to open and operate new stores successfully, we must:must secure leases on suitable sites with acceptable terms, build-out and equip the stores with furnishings and appropriate merchandise, hire and train personnel and integrate the stores into our operations.
| · | identify and secure suitable store sites on a timely basis; |
| · | negotiate acceptable lease terms, including desired tenant improvement allowances; |
| · | complete any necessary construction or refurbishment of these sites as well as furnish and equip the new stores timely; |
| · | hire, train and retain competent store personnel; |
| · | identify and source sufficient inventories to meet the needs of the new stores and the preferences of the consumers in that market; and |
| · | successfully integrate new stores into our existing operations. |
In addition, our expansion strategy may be subject to rising real estate and construction costs, available credit to landlords and developers and landlord bankruptcies that could inhibit our ability to sustain our rate of growth. We may also face new competitive, distribution and merchandising challenges different from those we currently face. We cannot give any assurances that we will be able to continue our expansion plans successfully; that we will be able to achieve results similar to those achieved with prior locations; or that we will be able to continue to manage our growth effectively. Our failure to achieve our expansion plans could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our operating margins may be impacted in periods in which incremental expenses are incurred as a result of new store openings.
The slower pace of our retail store expansion may negatively impact our net sales growth and operating income.
The opening of new retail stores has contributed significantly to our growth in net sales. In light of the challenging economic environment facing retailers and developers, we have made the strategic decision to slow down the pace of our retail store expansion. We expect to increase our overall store base by approximately 6% in Fiscal 2010 compared to 8% in Fiscal 2009 and 12% in Fiscal 2008. The slower pace of our retail store expansion may negatively impact our net sales growth and operating income.
Our estimates concerning long-lived assets and store closures may accelerate.
Our long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to operate stores in a manner that achieves appropriate returns on capital invested. This is particularly challenging in the current economic environment. We will only continue to operate existing stores if they meet required sales or profit levels. In the current macroeconomic environment, the results of our existing stores are impacted not only by a reduced sales environment, but by a number of things that are outside our control, such as the loss of traffic resulting from store closures by significant other retailers in our stores’ immediate vicinity.
The recession, coupled with the volatility in the capital markets, all affect our business and macroeconomic environment and, ultimately, the revenue and profitability of our business. To the extent our estimates for net sales, gross profit and store expenses are not realized, future assessments of recoverability could result in impairment charges. In addition, if we were to close stores, we could be subject to costs and impairment charges that may adversely affect our financial results.
Our stores are concentrated within the Sunbelt,Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest portionsregions of the United States, which could subject us to regional risks.
Because our stores are located primarily in a concentrated area of the United States, we are subject to regional risks, such as the regional economy, weather conditions and natural disasters such as floods, droughts, tornadoes and hurricanes, increasing costs of electricity, oil and natural gas, as well as, government regulations specific in the states and localities within which we operate. We sell a significant amount of team sports merchandise which can be adversely affected by significant weather events that postpone the start of or shorten sports seasons or that limit participation of fans and sports enthusiasts.
A downturnChanges in the economyfederal, state or local law, or our failure to comply with such laws, could affect consumer purchases of discretionary items, which could reduceincrease our sales.expenses and expose us to legal risks.
In general,Our business is subject to a wide array of laws and regulations. Significant legislative changes that impact our sales represent discretionary spendingrelationship with our workforce (none of which are represented by unions as of the end of Fiscal 2009) could increase our customers. Discretionary spending is affected by many factors, including:
| · | interest rates and inflation; |
| · | the impact of an economic recession; |
| · | the impact of natural disasters; |
| · | the availability of consumer credit; |
| · | consumer debt levels and reduced levels of consumer disposable income; |
| · | changes in tax rates and tax policies; |
| · | unemployment trends; and |
| · | consumer confidence in future economic conditions. |
Increasing volatilityexpenses and adversely affect our operations. Changes in financial marketsother regulatory areas, such as consumer credit, privacy and information security or product safety, among others, could cause a greater frequency or higher magnitude of change in many of the factors listed. Our customers’ purchases of discretionary items, including products that we sell, could decline during periods when disposable income is lower or periods of actual or perceived unfavorable economic conditions. If this occurs, our revenues and profitability could decline.expenses to increase. In addition, our salesif we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, particularly wage and hour laws, we could be adversely affected by a downturn in the economic conditions in the markets in which we operate.
We may be subject to periodiclegal risk, including government enforcement action and class action civil litigation, including the Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuits, which maycould adversely affect our results of operations. Changes in tax laws, the Company’s business and financial performance.interpretation of existing laws, or our failure to sustain our reporting positions on examination could adversely affect our effective tax rate.
From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, including class action lawsuits brought against us for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. We may incur losses relating to these claims and, in addition, these proceedings could cause us to incur costs and may require us to devote resources to defend against these claims which could adversely affect our results of operations. For a description of current legal proceedings, see Part“Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings.Proceedings”.
Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential information that could harm our business and reputation with our consumers.
The protection of Company, customer and employee data is critical to us. We rely on third-party systems, software and monitoring tools to provide security for processing, transmission and storage of confidential customer and employee information such as payment card and personal information. Despite the security measures we and our third-party providers have in place, our data may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, theft or other similar events. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, whether by the Company or its providers, could damage our reputation, expose us to risk of litigation and liability and harm our business.
Our inability to identify, and anticipate changes in consumer demands and preferences and our inability to respond to such consumer demands in a timely manner could reduce our sales.
Our products appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to rapid change. Our success depends on our ability to identify product trends as well as to anticipate and respond to changing merchandise trends and consumer demand in a timely manner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to offer assortments of products that appeal to our customers or that we will satisfy changing consumer demands in the future. Accordingly, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if:
| | · | we are unable to identify and respond to emerging trends, including shifts in the popularity of certain products; |
| | · | we miscalculate either the market for the merchandise in our stores or our customers’ purchasing habits; or |
| | · | consumer demand unexpectedly shifts away from athletic footwear or our more profitable apparel lines. |
In addition, we may be faced with significant excess inventory of some products and missed opportunities for other products, which could decrease our profitability.
If we lose any of our key vendors or any of our key vendors fail to supply us with merchandise, we may not be able to meet the demand of our customers and our net sales could decline.
Our business is dependent to a significant degree upon close relationships with vendors and our ability to purchase brand name merchandise at competitive prices. In addition, many of our vendors provide us with incentives, such as return privileges, volume purchasing allowances and cooperative advertising. The loss of key vendor support or decline or discontinuation of vendor incentives could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to acquire such merchandise at competitive prices or on competitive terms in the future. In this regard, certain merchandise that is in high demand may be allocated by vendors based upon the vendors’ internal criterion which is beyond our control.
A disruption in the flow of imported merchandise or an increase in the cost of those goods may significantly decrease our net sales and operating income.
In addition, weWe believe many of our largest vendors source a substantial majority of their products from China and other foreign countries. Imported goods are generally less expensive than domestic goods and indirectly contribute significantly to our favorable profit margins. A disruption in the flow of imported merchandise or an increase in the cost of those goods may significantly decrease our sales and profits.
We may experience a disruption or increase in the cost of imported vendor products at any time for reasons that may not be inbeyond our control. If imported merchandise becomes more expensive or unavailable, the transition to alternative sources by our vendors may not occur in time to meet our demands or the demands of our customers. Products from alternative sources may also be more expensive than those our vendors currently import. Risks associated with reliance on imported goods include:
| | · | disruptions in the flow of imported goods because of factors such as: |
| | · | raw material shortages, work stoppages, strikes and political unrest; |
| | · | problems with oceanic shipping;shipping, including blockages at U.S. or foreign ports; |
| | · | economic crises and international disputes; and |
| | · | increases in the cost of purchasing or shipping foreign merchandise resulting from: |
| | · | foreign government regulations; |
| | · | changes in currency exchange rates or policies and local economic conditions; and |
| | · | trade restrictions, including import duties, import quotas or loss of “most favored nation” status with the United States. |
In addition, to the extent that any foreign manufacturer from whom our vendors are associated may directly or indirectly utilize labor practices that are not commonly accepted in the United States, we could be affected by any resulting negative publicity. Our net sales and profitabilityoperating income could decline if vendors are unable to promptly replace sources providing equally appealing products at a similar cost.
Problems with our information system software could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our financial results and materially adversely affect our business operations.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on the successful integration and operation of our information systems. In particular, we rely on our information systems to manage effectively our sales, distribution, merchandise planning and replenishment, to process financial information and sales transactions and to optimize our overall inventory levels. Most of our information systems are centrally located at our headquarters, with offsite backup at other locations. Our systems, if not functioning properly, could disrupt our ability to track, record and analyze sales and inventory movement and could cause disruptions of operations, including, among other things, our ability to process and ship inventory, process financial information including credit card transactions, process payrolls or vendor payments or engage in other similar normal business activities. Any material disruption, malfunction or any other similar problemsproblem in or with our information systems could negatively impact our financial results and materially adversely affect our business operations.
Pressure from our competitors may force us to reduce our prices or increase our spending, which would lower our revenuenet sales and profitability.operating income.
The business in which we are engaged is highly competitive. The marketplace for sporting goods remains highly fragmented as many different retailers compete for market share by utilizing a variety of store formats and merchandising strategies. We compete with national chains that focus on athletic footwear, local sporting goods stores, department and discount stores, traditional shoe stores and mass merchandisers and, on a limited basis, national sporting goods stores. Many of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do. In addition, many of our competitors employ price discounting policies that, if intensified, may make it difficult for us to reach our sales goals without reducing our prices. As a result of this competition, we may also need to spend more on advertising and promotion than we anticipate. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Expansion into markets served by our competitors, entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets could be detrimental to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operating results are subject to seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales, operating income and net income. Our net sales, operating income and net income are typically higher in the spring, back-to-school and Christmas holiday seasons. An economic downturn during these periods could adversely affect us to a greater extent than if a downturn occurred at other times of the year.
Our highest sales and operating income historically occur during the fourth fiscal quarter, due mostly to the holiday selling season. Any decrease in our fourth quarter sales, whether because of a slow holiday selling season, unseasonable weather conditions, slowing economic conditions, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results for the entire fiscal year.
Our quarterly operating results, including comparable store net sales, will fluctuate and may not be a meaningful indicator of future performance and such fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our net sales and quarterly results of operations have fluctuated in the past and vary from quarter to quarter. A number of factors, many outside our control, can cause variations in our quarterly results, including:including changes in product demand that we offer in our stores which may be influenced by the retirement or demise of sports superstars key to certain product promotions or strikes or lockouts involving professional sports teams.
| · | changes in product demandWe cannot assure you that we offer in our stores; |
| · | retirement or demise of sports superstars key to certain product promotion; |
| · | strikes or lockouts involving professional sports teams; |
| · | costs related to the closures of existing stores; |
| · | changes in our merchandise assortment; |
| · | population trends and changes in the business environment. |
Changes in our comparable store net sales results could affectwill trend at the rates achieved in prior periods or that rates will not decline. Comparable store net sales vary from quarter to quarter, and an unanticipated decline in comparable store net sales may cause the price of our common stock.stock to fluctuate significantly. Factors which have historically affected, and will continue to affect our comparable store net sales results, include:
| | · | shifts in consumer tastes and fashion trends; |
| | · | calendar shifts of holiday or seasonal periods; |
| | · | the timing of new store openings and the relative proportion of new stores to mature stores; |
| | · | the level of pre-operatingpre-opening expenses associated with new stores; |
| | · | the amount and timing of net sales contributed by new stores; |
| | · | changes in the other tenants in the shopping centers in which we are located; |
| | · | pricing, promotionpromotions or other actions taken by us or our competitorsexisting or the addition ofpossible new competitors within our markets; |
| · | the timing and type of promotional events;competitors; and |
| | · | unseasonable weather conditions or natural disasters. |
We cannot assure you that comparable store sales will trend at the rates achieved in prior periods or that rates will not decline. Comparable store sales vary from quarter to quarter, and an unanticipated decline in revenues or comparable store sales may cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.
The market price of our common stock, is likely to be highly volatile aslike the stock market in general, is and has beenlikely to be highly volatile. Factors that could cause fluctuation in our common stock price may include, among other things:
| | · | actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results; |
| | · | changes in financial estimates by security analysts; |
| · | investment analysts and our inability to meet or exceed securities analysts’ estimates or expectations; |
| · | market reaction to conditions or trends within our industry or to changes in the market valuations of other retail companies;those estimates; |
| | · | additions or departures of key personnel; |
| | · | market rumors or announcements by us or by our competitors of significant acquisitions, divestitures or joint ventures, strategic partnerships, large capital commitments or other strategic initiatives; |
| · | announcements by us of large capital commitments; and |
| | · | sales of our common stock by key personnel or large institutional holders. |
Many of these factors are beyond our control and may cause the market price of our common stock to decline, regardless of our operating performance.
We would be materially and adversely affected if our single distribution center were shut down.
We currently operate a single centralized distribution center in Birmingham, Alabama. We receive and ship substantially all of our merchandise at our distribution center. Any natural disaster or other serious disruption to this facility due to fire, tornado or any other cause would damage a portion of our inventory and could impair our ability to adequately stock our stores and process returns of products to vendors and could adversely affect our sales and profitability. In addition, we could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to our stores during the time it takes for us to reopen or replace the center.
We depend on key personnel.
We have benefited from the leadership and performance of our senior management, especially Michael J. Newsome, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. If we lose the services of any of our principal executive officers, including Mr. Newsome, we may not be able to run our business effectively and operating results could suffer. In particular, Mr. Newsome has been instrumental in directing our business strategy within our target markets in the Sunbelt, Mid-Atlantic and the lower Midwest and maintaining long-term relationships with our key vendors. Our overall success and the success of our expansion strategy will depend on our ability to retain our current management, including Mr. Newsome, and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. As we continue to grow, we will continue to hire, appoint or otherwise change senior managers and other key executives. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our executive officers. The loss of services of Mr. Newsome for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the loss of certain other principal executive officers could affect our ability to run our business effectively and our ability to successfully expand our operations.
On March 9, 2005, we entered into a Retention Agreement (the Agreement) with Mr. Newsome. The purpose of the Agreement is to secure the continued employment of Mr. Newsome as an advisor to us following his future retirement from the duties of Chief Executive Officer of our Company. Such retirement is not currently planned.
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might deter acquisition bids for us.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects and may discourage, delay or prevent a takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in its best interest. These provisions, among other things:
| | · | classify our Board of Directors into three classes, each of which serves for different three yearthree-year periods; |
| | · | provide that a director may be removed by stockholders only for cause by a vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of our shares entitled to vote; |
| | · | provide that all vacancies on our Board of Directors, including any vacancies resulting from an increase in the number of directors, may be filled by a majority of the remaining directors, even if the number is less than a quorum; |
| | · | provide that special meetings of the stockholders may only be called by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, a majority of the Board of Directors or upon the demand of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at any such special meeting; and |
| | · | call for a vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote in order to amend the foregoing provisions and certain other provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws. |
In addition, our Board of Directors, without further action of the stockholders, is permitted to issue and fix the terms of preferred stock which may have rights senior to those of common stock. We are also subject to the Delaware business combination statute, which may render a change in control of us more difficult. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Laws would be expected to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by the Board of Directors, including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of Common Stockcommon stock held by stockholders.
None.
We currently lease all of our existing 688745 store locations and expect that our policy of leasing rather than owning will continue as we continue to expand. Our leases typically provide for terms of five to ten years with options on our part to extend. Most leases also contain a kick-out clause if projected sales levels are not met and an early termination/remedy option if co-tenancy and exclusivity provisions are violated. We believe this leasing strategy enhances our flexibility to pursue various expansion opportunities resulting from changing market conditions and to periodically re-evaluate store locations. Our ability to open new stores is contingent upon locating satisfactory sites, negotiating favorable leases, recruiting and training qualified management personnel and the availability of market relevant inventory.
As current leases expire, we believe we will either be able to obtain lease renewals for present store locations or to obtain leases for equivalent or better locations in the same general area. For the most part,Historically, we have not experienced any significant difficulty in either renewing leases for existing locations or securing leases for suitable locations for new stores. However, we are beginning to experience some difficulty in securing leases for new stores related to new construction due to the economic issues facing the commercial real estate market and landlords, thus reducing our ability to open stores at our historical rates. Based primarily on our belief that we maintain good relations with our landlords, that most of our leases are at approximate market rents and that generally we have been able to secure leases for suitable locations, we believe our lease strategy will not be detrimental to our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our corporate offices and our retail distribution center are leased under an operating lease. We own the Team Sales’ facility located in Birmingham, Alabama that warehouses inventory for educational institutions and youth associations. We believe our current distribution center is suitable and adequate to support our immediate needs in the next few years.
Store Locations
As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we currently operate 688745 stores in 2324 contiguous states.states, opening our first store in Wisconsin in the third quarter of Fiscal 2009. Of these stores, 224218 are located in malls and 464527 are located in strip-shopping centers which are typically anchoredinfluenced by a Wal-Mart store. The following shows the number of locations by state as of March 28, 2008:27, 2009:
| Alabama | 79 | | Kansas | 15 | | Ohio | 14 | 79 | | Illinois | 17 | | Mississippi | 53 | | South Carolina | 32 |
| Arizona | 5 | | Kentucky | 33 | | Oklahoma | 27 | 7 | | Indiana | 18 | | Nebraska | 5 | | Tennessee | 50 |
| Arkansas | 34 | | Louisiana | 33 | | South Carolina | 31 | 36 | | Kansas | 18 | | New Mexico | 9 | | Texas | 75 |
| Florida | 32 | | Missouri | 21 | | Tennessee | 50 | 36 | | Kentucky | 35 | | North Carolina | 43 | | Virginia | 20 |
| Georgia | 84 | | Mississippi | 52 | | Texas | 67 | 85 | | Louisiana | 41 | | Ohio | 20 | | West Virginia | 8 |
| Iowa | 5 | | Nebraska | 4 | | Virginia | 16 | 6 | | Missouri | 23 | | Oklahoma | 31 | | Wisconsin | 1 |
| Illinois | 16 | | New Mexico | 7 | | West Virginia | 4 | |
| Indiana | 18 | | North Carolina | 44 | | TOTAL | 691 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | TOTAL | 748 |
In October 2005, three former employees filed a lawsuit in Mississippi federal court alleging they are owed back wages for overtime because they were improperly classified as exempt salaried employees. They also alleged other wage and hour violations. The suit asked the court to certify the case as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of all similarly situated employees. We dispute the allegations of wrongdoing in this complaint and have vigorously defended ourselves in this matter. However, the parties have negotiated a settlement and the court has now ruled to certify the collective action in accordance with the negotiated settlement. At February 2, 2008, we began making initial distributions and estimated that the remaining liability related to this matter is $755,000. Accordingly, we accrued $755,000 as a current liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. At February 3, 2007, we had accrued $750,000 as a current liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet relating to this matter. Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2008, we completed our obligation under the negotiated settlement related to this case.
We are alsoa party to othervarious legal proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that any of these matters will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. We cannot give assurance, however, that one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse affecteffect on our results of operations for the period in which they are resolved. At January 31, 2009, we estimate that the liability related to these matters is approximately $47,000 and accordingly, have accrued $47,000 as a current liability on our consolidated balance sheet. As of February 2, 2008, we had accrued $0.8 million as it related to our estimated liability for legal proceedings which primarily consisted of an amount accrued for a pending lawsuit that has since been settled.
The estimateestimates of our liability for pending and unasserted potential claims doesdo not include litigation costs. It is our policy to accrue legal fees when it is probable that we will have to defend against known claims or allegations and we can reasonably estimate the amount of the anticipated expense. Although we have accrued legal fees associated with litigation currently pending against us, we have not made any accruals for potential liability for settlements or judgments because the potential liability is neither probable nor estimable.
From time to time, we enter into certain types of agreements that require us to indemnify parties against third party claims under certain circumstances. Generally, these agreements relate to: (a) agreements with vendors and suppliers under which we may provide customary indemnification to our vendors and suppliers in respect to actions they take at our request or otherwise on our behalf; (b) agreements to indemnify vendors against trademark and copyright infringement claims concerning merchandise manufactured specifically for or on behalf of the Company; (c) real estate leases, under which we may agree to indemnify the lessors from claims arising from our use of the property; and (d) agreements with our directors, officers and employees, under which we may agree to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their relationship with us. We have director and officer liability insurance, which, subject to the policy’s conditions, provides coverage for indemnification amounts payable by us with respect to our directors and officers up to specified limits and subject to certain deductibles.
If the Company believes that a loss is both probable and estimable for a particular matter, the loss is accrued in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”With respect to any matter, the Company could change its belief as to whether a loss is probable or estimable, or its estimate of loss, at any time. Even though the Company may not believe a loss is probable or estimable, it is reasonably possible that the Company could suffer a loss with respect to that matter in the future.
No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008.2009.
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ)(NASDAQ/GS) under the symbol HIBB. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of shares of our Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ.
| | | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | |
Fiscal 2008: | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2009: | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter ended May 3, 2008 | | | $ | 19.42 | | | $ | 13.59 | |
| Second Quarter ended August 2, 2008 | | | $ | 23.31 | | | $ | 16.97 | |
| Third Quarter ended November 1, 2008 | | | $ | 25.15 | | | $ | 13.41 | |
| Fourth Quarter ended January 31, 2009 | | | $ | 17.69 | | | $ | 11.74 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2008: | | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter ended May 5, 2007 | | $ | 32.97 | | | $ | 27.26 | | | $ | 32.97 | | | $ | 27.26 | |
| Second Quarter ended August 4, 2007 | | $ | 30.62 | | | $ | 23.70 | | | $ | 30.62 | | | $ | 23.70 | |
| Third Quarter ended November 3, 2007 | | $ | 28.74 | | | $ | 21.09 | | | $ | 28.74 | | | $ | 21.09 | |
| Fourth Quarter ended February 2, 2008 | | $ | 23.65 | | | $ | 12.30 | | | $ | 23.65 | | | $ | 12.30 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2007: | | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter ended April 29, 2006 | | $ | 34.54 | | | $ | 28.20 | | |
| Second Quarter ended July 29, 2006 | | $ | 31.19 | | | $ | 18.95 | | |
| Third Quarter ended October 28, 2006 | | $ | 28.16 | | | $ | 18.90 | | |
| Fourth Quarter ended February 3, 2007 | | $ | 33.95 | | | $ | 27.00 | | |
On March 28, 2008,27, 2009, the last reported sale price for our common stock as quoted by NASDAQ was $15.06$18.81 per share. As of March 28, 2008,27, 2009, we had 2342 stockholders of record.
The Stock Price Performance Graph below compares the percentage change in our cumulative total stockholder return on its common stock against a cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index. The graph below outlines returns for the period beginning on January 31, 20032004 to January 31, 2008.2009. We have not paid any dividends. Total stockholder return for prior periods is not necessarily an indication of future performance.
Dividend Policy.We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and for our stock repurchase program, and therefore do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future decision to declare or pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Equity Compensation Plans. For information on securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see “Part III, Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”
The following table presents our share repurchase activity for the thirteen weeks and quarter ending February 2, 2008:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES (1)
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | | Average Price per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Programs | |
| As of November 3, 2007 | | | 5,276,713 | | | $ | 23.45 | | | | 5,276,713 | | | $ | 126,239,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| November 4, 2007 to December 1, 2007 | | | 302,600 | | | | 21.44 | | | | 302,600 | | | | 119,752,000 | |
| December 2, 2007 to January 5, 2008 | | | 432,400 | | | | 20.45 | | | | 432,400 | | | | 110,908,000 | |
| January 6, 2008 to February 2, 2008 | | | 711,400 | | | | 15.34 | | | | 711,400 | | | | 99,996,000 | |
| Quarter ended February 2, 2008 | | | 1,446,400 | | | | 18.14 | | | | 1,446,400 | | | | 99,996,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL since inception | | | 6,723,113 | | | $ | 22.31 | | | | 6,723,113 | | | $ | 99,996,000 | |
(1) | In August 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase our common stock. The Board of Directors has subsequently authorized increases to this plan with a current authorization effective November 2007 of $250.0 million. The current authorization expires on January 30, 2010. Considering stock repurchases through February 2, 2008, we have approximately $100.0 million of the total authorization remaining for future stock repurchases. |
The following selected consolidated financial data has been derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements thereto.
| | (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and Selected Operating Data) | | | (In thousands, except per share amounts and Selected Operating Data) | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended | | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | February 2, | | | February 3, | | | January 28, | | | January 29, | | | January 31, | | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | | | January 28, | | | January 29, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | (52 weeks) | | | (53 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | | | (53 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 520,720 | | | $ | 512,094 | | | $ | 440,269 | | | $ | 377,534 | | | $ | 320,964 | | | $ | 564,188 | | | $ | 520,720 | | | $ | 512,094 | | | $ | 440,269 | | | $ | 377,534 | |
| Cost of goods sold, including distribution center and store occupancy costs | | 351,876 | | | | 338,963 | | | | 293,368 | | | | 255,250 | | | | 216,938 | | | | 378,817 | | | | 351,876 | | | | 338,963 | | | | 293,368 | | | | 255,250 | |
| Gross profit | | 168,844 | | | 173,131 | | | 146,901 | | | 122,284 | | | 104,026 | | | | 185,371 | | | | 168,844 | | | | 173,131 | | | | 146,901 | | | | 122,284 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Store operating, selling and administrative expenses | | 108,463 | | | 100,461 | | | 85,060 | | | 72,923 | | | 63,514 | | | | 123,075 | | | | 108,463 | | | | 100,461 | | | | 85,060 | | | | 72,923 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 12,154 | | | | 10,932 | | | | 10,119 | | | | 9,939 | | | | 9,686 | | | | 14,324 | | | | 12,154 | | | | 10,932 | | | | 10,119 | | | | 9,939 | |
| Operating income | | 48,227 | | | 61,738 | | | 51,722 | | | 39,422 | | | 30,826 | | | | 47,972 | | | | 48,227 | | | | 61,738 | | | | 51,722 | | | | 39,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | | 582 | | | 906 | | | 1,170 | | | 517 | | | 165 | | | | 41 | | | | 582 | | | | 906 | | | | 1,170 | | | | 517 | |
| Interest expense | | 151 | | | | 30 | | | | 24 | | | | 42 | | | | 59 | | | | (660 | ) | | | (151 | ) | | | (30 | ) | | | (24 | ) | | | (42 | ) |
| Interest income, net | | 431 | | | | 876 | | | | 1,146 | | | | 475 | | | | 106 | | |
| Interest (expense) income, net | | | | (619 | ) | | | 431 | | | | 876 | | | | 1,146 | | | | 475 | |
| Income before provision for income taxes | | 48,658 | | | 62,614 | | | 52,868 | | | 39,897 | | | 30,932 | | | | 47,353 | | | | 48,658 | | | | 62,614 | | | | 52,868 | | | | 39,897 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Provision for income taxes | | 18,329 | | | | 24,541 | | | | 19,244 | | | | 14,750 | | | | 11,290 | | | | 17,905 | | | | 18,329 | | | | 24,541 | | | | 19,244 | | | | 14,750 | |
| Net income | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | | | $ | 33,624 | | | $ | 25,147 | | | $ | 19,642 | | | $ | 29,448 | | | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | | | $ | 33,624 | | | $ | 25,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per common shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 1.19 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.72 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 1.03 | | | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 1.19 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.72 | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 1.02 | | | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 0.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | 31,049,058 | | | 32,094,127 | | | 33,605,568 | | | 34,855,682 | | | 34,521,674 | | | | 28,547 | | | | 31,049 | | | | 32,094 | | | | 33,606 | | | | 34,856 | |
| Diluted | | 31,525,050 | | | 32,619,839 | | | 34,393,026 | | | 35,690,363 | | | 35,397,089 | | | | 28,954 | | | | 31,525 | | | | 32,620 | | | | 34,393 | | | | 35,690 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Working capital | $ | 89,383 | | | $ | 106,428 | | | $ | 98,623 | | | $ | 106,012 | | | $ | 96,042 | | | $ | 107,055 | | | $ | 89,383 | | | $ | 106,428 | | | $ | 98,623 | | | $ | 106,012 | |
| Total assets | | 216,734 | | | 212,853 | | | 195,829 | | | 202,105 | | | 173,759 | | | | 235,087 | | | | 216,734 | | | | 212,853 | | | | 195,829 | | | | 202,105 | |
| Long-term debt | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Stockholders' investment | | 119,055 | | | 136,641 | | | 124,773 | | | 130,039 | | | 120,440 | | | | 136,575 | | | | 119,055 | | | | 136,641 | | | | 124,773 | | | | 130,039 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Selected Operating Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of stores open at end of period: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hibbett Sports | | 666 | | | 593 | | | 527 | | | 461 | | | 408 | | | | 723 | | | | 666 | | | | 593 | | | | 527 | | | | 461 | |
| Sports & Co. | | 4 | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
| Sports Additions | | 18 | | | | 16 | | | | 18 | | | | 17 | | | | 16 | | | | 18 | | | | 18 | | | | 16 | | | | 18 | | | | 17 | |
| Total | | 688 | | | | 613 | | | | 549 | | | | 482 | | | | 428 | | | | 745 | | | | 688 | | | | 613 | | | | 549 | | | | 482 | |
Note: No dividends have been declared or paid.
Overview
Hibbett Sports, Inc. operates sporting goods stores in small to mid-sized markets, predominantly in the Sunbelt,Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest regions of the lower Midwest.United States. Our stores offer a broad assortment of quality athletic equipment, footwear and apparel with a high level of customer service. As of February 2, 2008January 31, 2009, we operated a total of 688745 retail stores composed of 666723 Hibbett Sports stores, 18 Sports Additions athletic shoe stores and 4 Sports & Co. superstores in 2324 states.
Our primary retail format and growth vehicle is Hibbett Sports, a 5,000-square-foot store located primarily in strip centers which are usually anchoredinfluenced by a Wal-Mart store andor in enclosed malls. Over the last several years, we have concentrated and expect to continue our store base growth in strip centers versus enclosed malls. We believe Hibbett Sports stores are typically the primary sporting goods retailers in their markets due to the extensive selection of quality branded merchandise and a high level of customer service. We do not expect that the average size of our stores opening in Fiscal 20092010 will vary significantly from the average size of stores opened in Fiscal 2009.
The deteriorating global economic conditions experienced in Fiscal 2009 had an adverse effect on us. We experienced a slight decline in net income in Fiscal 2009 and an overall decline in net sales of equipment and licensed apparel. The impact of these decreases was offset by net sales increases in footwear and accessories and our continued successful implementation of our growth strategy. As a result, our gross profit increased in Fiscal 2009 compared to Fiscal 2008.
We historically have increases in comparable store net sales in the low to mid-single digit range. We plan to increase total company-wide square footage by approximately 11%6% in Fiscal 2009,2010, which is slightly belowless than our increases over the last several years of between 12%8% and 15%14%. We believe total sales percentage growth will be midlow to highmid single digits in Fiscal 2009.2010. Over the past several years, we have increased our product margin due to improved vendor discounts, fewer retail reductions and increased efficiencies in logistics andlogistics. We have also experienced favorable leveraging of store occupancy costs. We expect a slight improvement in product margin rate in Fiscal 20092010 attributable primarily to improved vendor discounts.increased efficiencies from our previous investment in systems.
Although the macroeconomic environment will provide many challenges in the short-term, our management believes that our business fundamentals remain strong and that we are well-positioned for the future. We are a leader in the markets in which we compete and we will continue to benefit from our comparatively low operating costs compared to the costs of our competitors. We intend to manage our costs and inventories prudently as dictated by the current economic environment. Although at a slower pace than in prior years, we intend to continue to invest in initiatives to prepare for long-term growth.
Our management expects that the unfavorable global economic conditions experienced in the second half of Fiscal 2009 will continue. The economy is expected to have a negative impact on customer discretionary spending, which may negatively impact our net sales in Fiscal 2010.
Due to our increased net sales, we have historically leveraged our store operating, selling and administrative expenses. Based on projected net sales, we expect operating, selling and administrative rates to increase somewhat in Fiscal 20092010, primarily due to lower than normal historical sales growth and increases in the statutory minimum wage. We also expect to continue to generate sufficient cash to enable us to expand and remodel our store base and to provide capital expenditures for both distribution center and technology upgrade projects.
Hibbett maintains a merchandise management system that allows us to identify and monitor trends. However, this system does not produce U.S. generally accepted accounting principle (GAAP) financial information by product category. Therefore, it is impracticable to provide GAAP net sales by product category.
Our audited consolidated financial statements presented in this Form 10-K differ from our earnings release reported on March 13, 2008 due to a refinement of our estimate of the lower of cost or market reserve. The revised estimate resulted in a decrease of $0.8 million in ending inventory and pre-tax income from previously reported numbers.
Hibbett operates on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31 of each year. The consolidated statementstatements of operations for fiscal yearyears ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 includes 52 weeks of operations. The consolidated statementsstatement of operations for fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 includes 53 weeks of operations and the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 includes 52 weeks of operations. We have operated as a public company and have been incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware since October 6, 1996.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain items included in our Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Operations expressedoperations for the periods indicated.
| | | Fiscal Year Ended |
| | Fiscal Year Ended | January 31, | | February 2, | | February 3, |
| | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2007 |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| Costs of goods sold, including distribution and store occupancy costs | | 67.6 | | | | 66.2 | | | | 66.6 | | | 67.1 | | | | 67.6 | | | | 66.2 | |
| Gross profit | | 32.4 | | | 33.8 | | | 33.4 | | | 32.9 | | | | 32.4 | | | | 33.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Store operating, selling and administrative expenses | | 20.8 | | | 19.6 | | | 19.3 | | | 21.8 | | | | 20.8 | | | | 19.6 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 2.3 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 2.3 | | | 2.5 | | | | 2.3 | | | | 2.1 | |
| Operating income | | 9.3 | | | 12.1 | | | 11.8 | | | 8.5 | | | | 9.3 | | | | 12.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | | 0.1 | | | 0.2 | | | 0.3 | | | - | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.2 | |
| Interest expense | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | (0.1 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
| Interest income, net | | 0.1 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.3 | | |
| Interest (expense) income, net | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.2 | |
| Income before provision for income taxes | | 9.3 | | | 12.2 | | | 12.0 | | | 8.4 | | | | 9.3 | | | | 12.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Provision for income taxes | | 3.5 | | | | 4.8 | | | | 4.4 | | | 3.2 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 4.8 | |
| Net income | | 5.8 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | 7.6 | % | | 5.2 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 7.4 | % |
Note: Columns may not footsum due to rounding.
Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Net sales. Net sales increased $43.5 million, or 8.4%, to $564.2 million for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009, from $520.7 million for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. We attribute this increase to the following factors:
| · | We opened 69 Hibbett Sports stores while closing 12 Hibbett Sports stores for net stores opened of 57 stores in the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009. New stores and stores not in the comparable store net sales calculation accounted for $41.0 million of the increase in net sales. Store openings and closings are reported net of relocations. |
| · | We experienced a 0.5% increase in comparable store net sales for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009 compared to the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. Higher comparable store net sales contributed $2.5 million to the increase in net sales. |
| · | Although we saw a decrease in store traffic, items per sales transaction improved by 2.8%. |
The slight increase in comparable store net sales was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of items per transaction and improved efficiencies in systems that enhanced our ability to offer the right product in the right store. We also believe that the close proximity of our stores, coupled with branded merchandise selection and the higher average fuel costs for most of the year, encouraged the customer in our smaller markets to shop closer to home.
We experienced the following trends in Fiscal 2009:
| · | Children’s footwear performed well, while women’s footwear weakened. Men’s marquee product performed well. |
| · | The decline in the urban apparel business was offset by increases in Mixed Martial Arts apparel and equipment. |
| · | Our strip center stores outperformed our enclosed mall stores. |
Comparable store net sales data for the period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed from the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12 months. During the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009, 581 stores were included in the comparable store net sales comparison. Our four Sports & Co. stores are not and have never been included in the comparable store net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore since September 1996 nor do we plan to open additional superstores in the future.
Gross profit. Cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and occupancy and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross profit was $185.4 million, or 32.9% of net sales, in the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009, compared with $168.8 million, or 32.4% of net sales, in the 52 week period of the prior fiscal year. We attribute this increase in gross profit to improvement in shrinkage and markdowns. Store occupancy experienced its largest decrease in rent expense due to favorable lease terms resulting from co-tenancy violations and from renegotiating certain leases, while utility expenses increased as a percent to net sales. Distribution expenses experienced decreases in data processing costs while fuel costs increased.
Store operating, selling and administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and administrative expenses were $123.1 million, or 21.8% of net sales, for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009, compared with $108.5 million, or 20.8% of net sales, for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. Expenses contributing to this increase included:
| · | Salary and benefit costs in our stores increased by 57 basis points resulting primarily from increased incentive sales pay and increases in the minimum wage. These expenses increased by 60 basis points at the administrative level primarily as the result of increased bonus accruals. |
| · | Legal fees decreased by 9 basis points due to the settlement of employment litigation early in the year. Inventory counting expenses decreased by 8 basis points as the result of taking fewer second store inventories compared to a year ago. Data processing costs decreased by 7 basis points as we passed the anniversary of our implementation of our new merchandising system. Freight and shipping expenses increased overall by 6 basis points, but have been decreasing with lower fuel costs in the last half of our fiscal year. |
| · | Stock-based compensation accounted for a decrease of 7 basis points primarily due to lower stock prices in Fiscal 2009 compared to Fiscal 2008. |
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales was 2.5% in the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009, and 2.3% in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. The average lease term of new store leases added in Fiscal 2009 compared to those added in Fiscal 2008 decreased in lease terms to 6.65 years compared to 6.71 years, respectively. We attribute the slight increase in depreciation expense as a percent to net sales primarily due to a change in estimate of the economic useful life of leasehold improvements in certain underperforming stores.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales was 3.2% in the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009, compared to 3.5% for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. The combined federal, state and local effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income was 37.8% for Fiscal 2009 and 37.7% for Fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net sales. Net sales increased $8.6 million, or 1.7%, to $520.7 million for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, from $512.1 million for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. We attribute this slight increase to the following factors:
| | · | We opened 82 Hibbett Sports and 2 Sports Additions stores while closing 9 Hibbett Sports stores for net stores opened of 75 stores in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. New stores and stores not in the comparable store net sales calculation accounted for $22.6 million of the increase in net sales. Store openings and closings are reported net of relocations. |
| | · | We experienced a 3.1% decrease in comparable store net sales for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 compared to the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2007 primarily as the result of a decrease in store traffic resulting from a difficult economic environment in our industry. |
| | · | Net sales increased 4.1% for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 compared to the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2007. |
| | · | Net sales from the 53rd week of Fiscal 2007 accounted for approximately $11.8 million or approximately 2.4%. |
We believe the decrease in comparable store net sales is attributable to overall economic pressures on our consumers resulting from the housing slump, rising fuel prices and anxiety over the economy in general. Additionally, our results were impacted by a weakening in our urban markets as we believe those fashion dollars historically used for high-priced athletic shoes and fashion items shifted to high-priced electronics. We experienced the following trends in Fiscal 2008:
| | · | We experienced an overall decline in footwear and equipment sales. |
| | · | Pro-licensed apparel continued its slow down, especially in NBA licensed product. |
| | · | We saw a negative shift in our urban fashion apparel and footwear. |
Comparable store net sales data for the period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed from the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12 months. During the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, 524 stores were included in the comparable store net sales comparison. Our four Sports & Co. stores are not and have never been included in the comparable store net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore since September 1996 nor do we plan to open additional superstores in the future.
Gross profit. Cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and occupancy and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross profit was $168.8 million, or 32.4% of net sales, in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, compared with $173.1 million, or 33.8% of net sales, in the 53 week period of the prior fiscal year. We attribute this decrease in gross profit to a slight decrease in product margins and the deleveraging of store occupancy costs and distribution expenses. Store occupancy experienced its largest increases in rent expense and utilities expenses as a percent to net sales. Distribution expenses were impacted primarily in data processing costs resulting from contract labor costs to support information technology upgrades and projects.
Store operating, selling and administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and administrative expenses were $108.5 million, or 20.8% of net sales, for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, compared with $100.5 million, or 19.6% of net sales, for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. Expenses contributing to this increase included:
| | · | Salary and benefit costs in our stores increased by 81 basis points while decreasing 29 basis points at the administrative level. Store costs were impacted by the lower than expected sales growth and larger than normal fourth quarter store openings, while administrative salaries decreased as a result of lost bonuses. |
| | · | Net advertising expenses increased 18 basis points due to the increased advertising efforts for new and low performing stores. |
| | · | Stock-based compensation accounted for 15 basis points. The expense associated with the movement of certain grant dates into the first quarter as compared to a year ago was somewhat offset by a higher than normal forfeiture of awards resulting from employee turnover and loss of performance-based awards. |
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales was 2.3% in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, and 2.1% in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. The weighted-averageaverage lease term of new store leases added in Fiscal 2008 compared to those added in Fiscal 2007 decreased in lease terms atto 6.71 years compared to 7.62 years, respectively. We attribute the increase in depreciation expense as a percent to net sales to the shorter lease terms, as well as, the information systems placed in service as of February 4, 2007.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales was 3.5% in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, compared to 4.8% for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. The combined federal, state and local effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income was 37.7% for Fiscal 2008 and 39.2% for Fiscal 2007. The decrease in rate over last year is primarily the result of the favorable resolution of certain state tax issues, lower than historical stock option exercise behavior, and higher than historical equity forfeitures offset somewhat by the permanent differences related to incentive stock options.
Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net sales. Net sales increased $71.8 million, or 16.3%, to $512.1 million for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, from $440.3 million for the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006. We attribute this increase to the following factors:
| · | We opened 74 Hibbett Sports and closed 8 Hibbett Sports stores and 2 Sports Additions stores for net stores opened of 64 stores in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. New stores and stores not in the comparable store net sales calculation accounted for $56.7 million of the increase in net sales. |
| · | We experienced a 3.8% increase in comparable store net sales for the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2007 primarily as the result of an increase in price. Higher comparable store net sales contributed $15.1 million to the increase in net sales. |
| · | We believe sales pick-up related to the 53rd week contributed approximately 2.7% to the increase in sales over last year.
|
We believe the increase in comparable store sales is attributable to an overall positive merchandise performance during the year and increased focus on customer service. Additionally, our results were positively impacted in the third quarter by the introduction of tax-free holidays in three of our states and an increased promotional effort in an attempt to leverage the strong post-hurricane sales from the prior year. We also experienced strong seasonal sales in the last quarter of Fiscal 2007 related to the Christmas holidays.
| · | Nike and Under Armour brands experienced solid performance in youth and cleats, performance apparel and team equipment. |
| · | Pro and college licensed apparel performed well, particularly in youth products and NFL jerseys. Key professional teams in our market included the Indianapolis Colts, New Orleans Saints and Chicago Bears. Top selling NFL jerseys included Peyton Manning, Reggie Bush, Tony Romo and Brian Urlacher. College licensed apparel was led by women’s Nike product. |
| · | We continue to experience weakness in caps and in classics footwear. |
Comparable store net sales data for the period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed from the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12 months. During the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2007, 459 stores were included in the comparable store sales comparison. Our four Sports & Co. stores are not and have never been included in the comparable store net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore since September 1996 nor do we plan to open additional superstores in the future.
Gross profit. Cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and occupancy and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross profit was $173.1 million, or 33.8% of net sales, in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, compared with $146.9 million, or 33.4% of net sales, in the 52 week period of the prior fiscal year. We attribute this increase in gross profit primarily to a reduction in markdown rate. Occupancy, as a percent of net sales, improved by 31 basis points year over year due to decreases in common area maintenance and rental expenses as a percentage of sales. Offsetting these decreases were distribution center costs by 10 basis points, primarily due to the increased repair and maintenance expenses and a decrease in vendor violations.
Store operating, selling and administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and administrative expenses were $100.5 million, or 19.6% of net sales, for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, compared with $85.1 million, or 19.3% of net sales, for the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006. These expenses increased as a percentage of net sales between periods primarily due to the implementation of 123R which added 53 basis points in stock based compensation. Other trends experienced included:
| · | an increase in legal fees as a percent of net sales of 8 basis points related to pending litigation; |
| · | an increase in credit/debit card fees as a percent of net sales of 7 basis points related to the increased use of these tenders by our customers over cash; and |
| · | decreases as a percent of net sales in insurance costs of 11 basis points and freight and shipping costs of 5 basis points. |
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales was 2.1% in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, and 2.3% in the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006. We experienced a slight trend upwards in the terms of our new store leases which contributed to the leveraging of depreciation expense as leasehold improvements were expensed over the longer lease term which, in most cases, is less than the estimated useful life of the asset. Our average lease term of leases added in Fiscal 2007 was 7.44 years compared to 7.15 years for leases added in Fiscal 2006.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales was 4.8% in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, compared to 4.4% for the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006. The combined federal, state and local effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income was 39.2% for Fiscal 2007 and 36.4% for Fiscal 2006. The increase in rate over last year is primarily the result of the permanent difference related to incentive stock options arising as a result of applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our capital requirements relate primarily to new store openings, stock repurchases and working capital requirements. Our working capital requirements are somewhat seasonal in nature and typically reach their peak near the end of the third and the beginning of the fourth quarters of our fiscal year. Historically, we have funded our cash requirements primarily through our cash flow from operations and occasionally from borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.
Our Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Cash Flowscash flows are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities: | $ | 48,022 | | | $ | 36,462 | | | $ | 38,061 | | | $ | 38,997 | | | $ | 48,022 | | | $ | 36,462 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities: | | (16,549 | ) | | (2,997 | ) | | (28,532 | ) | | | (13,781 | ) | | | (16,549 | ) | | | (2,997 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities: | | (51,098 | ) | | | (29,042 | ) | | | (41,927 | ) | | | (15,308 | ) | | | (51,098 | ) | | | (29,042 | ) |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (19,625 | ) | | $ | 4,423 | | | $ | (32,398 | ) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 9,908 | | | $ | (19,625 | ) | | $ | 4,423 | |
Cash flow from operations is seasonal in our business. Typically, we use cash flow from operations to increase inventory in advance of peak selling seasons, such as pre-Christmas and back-to-school. Inventory levels are reduced in connection with higher sales during the peak selling seasons and this inventory reduction, combined with proportionately higher net income, typically produces a positive cash flow. In recent periods, we have experienced a trend of increasing free rent provisions in lieu of cash construction allowances in our leases. We believe this is primarily the result of the tightening of commercial credit on our landlords. Because of this, the non-cash portion of landlord allowances has also experienced increases.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $48.0$39.0 million for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $48.0 million and $36.5 million in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 and $38.1 million in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, and the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006, respectively.
Inventory levels have continued to increase year over year as the number of stores have increased.increased, although the inventory per store is trending slightly down to flat. The increase in inventory used cash of $10.4 million, $16.0 million $16.4 million and $5.9$16.4 million during Fiscal 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006,2007, respectively, while the accounts payable increase provided cash of $0.3 million and $22.1 million during Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008, respectively, as we managed cash while protecting vendor discounts. During Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, the accounts payable decrease used cash of $3.9 million and $4.3 million, respectively.million. Net income provided cash of $29.4 million, $30.3 million $38.1 million and $33.6$38.1 million during Fiscal 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively. Also offsetting uses of cash were non-cash charges, including depreciation and amortization expense of $14.3 million, $12.2 million $10.9 million and $10.1$10.9 million during Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively, and stock-based compensation expense of $3.6 million, $3.7 million and $2.8 million during Fiscal 2009, 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively. A shift in the timing of certain equity awards contributed to the increase in stock-based compensation in Fiscal 2008 over Fiscal 2007.
Investing Activities.
Cash used in investing activities in the fiscal periods ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006 totaled $13.8 million, $16.5 million $3.0 million and $28.5$3.0 million, respectively. Net purchases of short-term investments were $0.1 million and $0.2 million during Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008, respectively, compared to net redemptions of short-term investments of $13.2 million during Fiscal 2007 and net purchases of short-term investments of $13.2 million during Fiscal 2006.2007. Gross capital expenditures used $13.7 million, $16.4 million $16.3 million and $15.3$16.3 million during Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively. In Fiscal 2008, short-term investments were redeemed for cash used in our stock repurchase program.
We use cash in investing activities to build new stores and remodel or relocate existing stores. Furthermore, net cash used in investing activities includes purchases of information technology assets and expenditures for our distribution facility and corporate headquarters.
We opened 8469 new stores and relocated and/or remodeled 1319 existing stores during the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009. We opened 81 new stores and relocated and/or remodeled 16 existing stores during the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008. We opened 7473 new stores and relocated and/or remodeled 78 existing stores during the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. We opened 74 new stores and relocated and/or remodeled 9 existing stores during the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006.
We estimate the cash outlay for capital expenditures in the fiscal year ended January 31, 200930, 2010 will be approximately $24.0$18.3 million, which relates to the opening of approximately 8570 new stores, remodeling of selected existing stores, information system upgrades and various improvements at our headquarters and distribution center. Of the total budgeted dollars for capital expenditures for Fiscal 2009,2010, we anticipate that approximately 70%66% will be related to the opening of new stores and remodeling and or relocating existing stores. Approximately 21%22% will be related to information systems with the remaining 9%12% related primarily to office expansion, distribution center improvement and security equipment for our stores.
As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we had an approximate $0.1$0.2 million outlay remaining on enhancements to our JDAmerchandising system relating to inventory planning and replenishment.planning. We anticipate that these upgrades will be implemented in the first half of Fiscal 20092010 and believe these enhancements will help us develop better efficiencies in the allocation and planning of inventory and better enable us to analyze and generally improve sales across all markets and merchandise by allowing us to better analyze inventory at the store level.
Financing Activities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $15.3 million in the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2009 compared to $51.1 million and $29.0 million in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 compared to $29.0 million inand the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, and $41.9 million in the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006, respectively. The cash fluctuation as compared to prior fiscal years was primarily the result of the repurchase of our common stock. We expended $16.9 million, $52.7 million $33.0 million and $45.3$33.0 million on repurchases of our common stock during Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively.
Financing activities also consisted of proceeds from transactions in our common stock and the excess tax benefit from the exercise of incentive stock options. As stock options are exercised, we will continue to receive proceeds and expect a tax deduction; however, the amounts and timing cannot be predicted.
At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we had atwo unsecured revolving credit facilityfacilities that allowsallow borrowings up to $30.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, and which renewsrenew in August 2008. Under the provisions of this facility, we can draw down funds when our main operating account falls below $100,000.2009 and December 2009, respectively. The facility doesfacilities do not require a commitment or agency fee andnor are there are noany covenant restrictions associated with the facility.restrictions. We plan to renew this facilitythese facilities as it expiresthey expire and do not anticipate any problems in doing so; however, no assurance can be given that we will be granted a renewal or terms which are acceptable to us.
Subsequent to fiscal year endedAt February 2, 2008, we entered into an additionalhad a revolving credit facility that allowsallowed borrowings up to $50.0$30.0 million to facilitate our stock repurchase program.and which renewed in August 2008. The facility is unsecureddid not require a commitment or agency fee and expires on December 31, 2008. There arethere were no covenant restrictions on thisassociated with the facility.
At February 3, 2007, we had a revolving credit facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and renewed annually in November. Under the provisions of this facility, we could draw down funds when our main operating account fell below $100,000. The facility did not require a commitment or agency fee and there were no covenant restrictions associated with the facility.
At January 28, 2006, we had two unsecured credit facilities that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and $10.0 million and which renewed annually in November. Under the provisions of these facilities, we could draw down funds when our main operating account fell below $100,000. Neither facility required a commitment or agency fee nor were there any covenant requirements.
As of January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, we had no debt outstanding under any of theseour facilities. Based on our current operating and store opening plans and plans for the repurchase of our common stock, we believe we can fund our cash needs for the foreseeable future through cash generated from operations and, if necessary, through periodic future borrowings against our credit facilities.
The following table lists the aggregate maturities of various classes of obligations and expiration amounts of various classes of commitments related to Hibbett Sports, Inc. at February 2, 2008:January 31, 2009:
| | Payments due under contractual obligations (in thousands) | |
| | Long-term Debt Obligations (1) | | | Capital Lease Obligations (2) | | | Operating Lease Obligations (3) | | | Total | |
| Fiscal 2009 | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 40,332 | | | $ | 40,332 | |
| Fiscal 2010 | | - | | | | - | | | | 35,676 | | | | 35,676 | |
| Fiscal 2011 | | - | | | | - | | | | 28,735 | | | | 28,735 | |
| Fiscal 2012 | | - | | | | - | | | | 22,635 | | | | 22,635 | |
| Fiscal 2013 | | - | | | | - | | | | 17,519 | | | | 17,519 | |
| Thereafter | | - | | | | - | | | | 32,280 | | | | 32,280 | |
| | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 177,177 | | | $ | 177,177 | |
| | | Payment due by period (in thousands) | |
| Contractual Obligations | | Total | | | Less than 1 year | | | 1 - 3 years | | | 3 - 5 years | | | More than 5 years | |
| Long-term Debt Obligations (1) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| Capital Lease Obligations (2) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Operating Lease Obligations (3) | | | 178,161 | | | | 42,496 | | | | 66,804 | | | | 41,404 | | | | 27,457 | |
| Purchase Obligations (4) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Other Long-Term Liabilities (5) | | | 908 | | | | 698 | | | | 93 | | | | - | | | | 117 | |
| Total | | $ | 179,069 | | | $ | 43,194 | | | $ | 66,897 | | | $ | 41,404 | | | $ | 27,574 | |
| (1) | See “Debt” –“Part II, Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statement Note 5 in Item 8. – Debt.” |
| (2) | As of Fiscal 2008,January 31, 2009, we do not have any capital lease obligations. |
| (3) | See “Lease Commitments” –“Part II, Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9 – Lease Commitments.” |
| (4) | Purchase obligations would include any commitment to purchase goods or services of either a fixed or minimum quantity that are enforceable and legally binding on us and (1) that are non-cancelable, (2) that we would incur a penalty or termination fee if the agreement was cancelled or (3) that we must make specified minimum payments even if we do not take delivery of the contracted products or services. At January 31, 2009, we were not subject to any material obligation, either individually or in the aggregate, whereby we could not cancel without due notice and without penalty or termination fee. |
| (5) | Other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet primarily consists of deferred rent, long-term deferred income taxes and liabilities under our Supplemental 401(k) Plan. These liabilities have been excluded from the above table as the timing and/or amount of any cash payment is uncertain. See “Part II, Item 8.8, Consolidated Financial Statement Note 1 – Deferred Rent” for a discussion on our deferred rent liabilities. See “Part II, Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements Note 8 – Income Taxes” for a discussion of our deferred income tax positions and accruals for uncertain tax positions. See “Part II, Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6 – Defined Contribution Plans” for a discussion regarding our employee benefit plans. The table above includes stand-by letters of credit in conjunction with our self-insured worker’s compensation and general liability coverages and amounts accrued for director deferred compensation in cash payable upon retirement of the director. |
Approximately $2.3Excluded from this table are approximately $2.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits which have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with FINFASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, and we are uncertainAccounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, as to if or whenthe timing of such amounts maypayments cannot be settled.reasonably determined.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not provided any financial guarantees as of February 2, 2008. All purchase obligations are cancelable and therefore are not included in the table above.
January 31, 2009. We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating our business. We do not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into the financial statements.
Inflation and Other Economic Factors
Our ability to provide quality merchandise on a profitable basis may be subject to economic factors and influences that we cannot control. National or international events, including uncertainties in the war on terrorismfinancial markets, policies of the newly elected administration and unrest in the Middle East, could lead to disruptions in economies in the United States or in foreign countries where a significant portion of our merchandise is manufactured. These and other factors could increase our merchandise costs and other costs that are critical to our operations. Consumer spending could also continue to decline because of economic pressures.
Merchandise Costs. Based on current economic conditions, we expect that any increase in merchandise costs per unit will be offset by improved vendor discounts and increased retail prices in Fiscal 2009.2010.
Freight Costs. We continued to experience risingexperienced higher fuel costs during most of Fiscal 20082009 that increased our overall freight costs for the year. At the end of Fiscal 2009, freight costs had dropped significantly and somewhat leveraged, and we expect that fuel costs may continue to remain stable or rise slightly in Fiscal 2009.2010. We do not expect increasesany volatility in freight costs to have a material effect on our results of operations as we continue to leveragehave historically leveraged the costs associated with inbound freight against the cost of outbound freight.
Minimum Wage. Recent increases in the mandated minimum wage have impacted our payroll costs. Congress has approved federal minimum wage increases by approximately 41% over a three yearthree-year period with the first increase of approximately 14%13.6% taking place during Fiscal 2008.2008 and the second increase of 12.0% taking place during Fiscal 2009. By July 2009, the federal minimum wage will increase an additional 24.0%9.7%. All of the states we operate in have either passed legislation to raise the minimum wage or their minimum wage is increasing in conjunction with the federal minimum wage. Some of the states have automatic provision for future increase based on the Consumer Price Index or on inflation. We expect wage increases to have a slight affect on our store operating, selling and administrative expenses.
Insurance Costs. In Fiscal 2009, general business insurance premiums were lower but we experienced an increase in the self-insured portion of workers’ compensation and general liability claims and increased our accrual for such claims. In Fiscal 2008, we continued to experienceexperienced a decrease in general business insurance that began in Fiscal 2007, when we changed to a partially self-insured program for our workers’ compensation and general liability. During bothall three fiscal periods, we have experienced an increase in our average monthly health insurance claims. In Fiscal 2006,2010, we experienced an increase inexpect that both general business insurance costs due to raised limits on Directors and Officers insurance and expanded coverage on our distribution center. During the same period, health insurance declined due to a reduction in claims. In Fiscal 2009, we expect that general business insurance costs will stabilize while health insurance costs will increase slightly.slightly, but do not expect these increases to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This statement identifies the sources for U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and lists the categories in descending order. An entity should follow the highest category of GAAP applicable for each of its accounting transactions. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to remove the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles from auditing standards. The SEC approved the PCAOB amendments on September 16, 2008, making SFAS No. 162 effective on November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why they use derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in purchased entities, measured at their fair values at the date of acquisition based upon the definition of fair value outlined in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. For us, SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for acquisitions beginning on and after February 1, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement 115.” This statement permits companies to elect to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value. At each reporting date subsequent to adoption, unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected must be reported in earnings. On February 3, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 159 was effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that began after November 15, 2007,and elected not to use fair value measurement on any assets or February 3, 2008 for our Company. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.liabilities under this statement.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expandsrequires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements; however, SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 isrequires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy, as defined. SFAS No. 157 may require companies to provide additional disclosures based on that hierarchy. This statement was to be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We implementedIn February 2008, FSP FAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, was issued which delayed the applicability of SFAS No. 157157’s fair value measurements to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities to those fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on February 3, 2008 anda recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of the adoptionprovisions of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effectimpact on our consolidated financial statements.
Our Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies reflected in the consolidated financial statements are detailed below.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue, including gift card and layaway sales, in accordance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” as amended by SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.”
Retail merchandise sales occur on-site in our retail stores. Customers have the option of paying the full purchase price of the merchandise upon sale or paying a down payment and placing the merchandise on layaway. The customer may make further payments in installments, but the entire purchase price for merchandise placed on layaway must be received by us within 30 days. The down payment and any installments are recorded by us as short-term deferred revenue until the customer pays the entire purchase price for the merchandise. We recognize revenue at the time the customer takes possession of the merchandise. Retail sales are recorded net of returns and discounts and exclude sales taxes.
In Fiscal 2009, we began a customer loyalty program, the MVP Rewards program, whereby customers enroll in the program and receive points in a variety of ways that are automatically converted into reward certificates based on program parameters that are subject to change. An estimate of the obligation related to the program, based on estimated redemption rates, is recorded as a current liability and a reduction of net retail sales in the period earned by the customer. The current liability is reduced, and a corresponding amount is recognized in net retail sales, in the amount of and at the time of redemption of the reward certificate. At January 31, 2009, the amount recorded in current liabilities for reward certificates issued was inconsequential.
The cost of coupon sales incentives is recognized at the time the related revenue is recognized by us.recognized. Proceeds received from the issuance of gift cards are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Revenue is subsequently recognized at the time the customer redeems the gift cards and takes possession of the merchandise. Unredeemed gift cards are recorded as a current liability.
It is not our policy to take unclaimed layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards into income. As of January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, and January 28, 2006, there was no breakage revenue recorded in income. The deferred revenue liability for layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards was $2.4 million and $2.1 million at January 31, 2009 and $1.8 million at February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively. Any unrecognized breakage revenue is immaterial. We escheat unredeemed gift cards.
Inventory Valuation.
Lower of Cost or MarketMarket: : Beginning in Fiscal 2008, inventory isInventories are valued using the lower of weighted-averageweighted average cost or market method. Market is determined based on estimated net realizable value. We regularly review inventories to determine if the carrying value exceeds realizable value, and we record a reservean accrual to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value as necessary. We account for obsolescence as part of our lower of cost or market reserveaccrual based on historical trends and specific identification. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, the reserveaccrual was $2.0 million and $1.5 million. There was no amount reserved asmillion, respectively. A determination of February 3, 2007. Our inventory valuation reserves contain uncertainties as the calculations require management to make assumptionsnet realizable value requires significant judgment and to apply judgment regarding such factors as market conditions, the selling environment, historical results and current inventory trends.
Prior to Fiscal 2008, cost was assigned to store inventories using the retail inventory method. In using this method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins were computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. The retail method is an averaging method that has been widely used in the retail industry and results in valuing inventories at lower of cost or market when markdowns are taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories on a timely basis.
Our management believes that the application of the cost method is preferable as compared to the retail method because it increases the organizational focus on the actual margin realized on each sale.estimates.
Shrink Reserves:Reserves: We accrue for inventory shrinkage based on the actual historical shrink results of our most recent physical inventories. These estimates are compared to actual results as physical inventory counts are performed and reconciled to the general ledger. Store counts are typically performed on a cyclical basis and the distribution center’s counts are performed mid-year and in late December or early January every year. In Fiscal 2009, the distribution center’s counts were performed quarterly. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the reserveaccrual was $0.9$1.4 million and $2.0$0.9 million, respectively.
Inventory Purchase Concentration: Our business is dependent to a significant degree upon close relationships with our vendors. Our largest vendor, Nike, represented approximately 51.4% and 48.5% of our purchases for Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008, respectively. Our second largest vendor represented approximately 8.4% and 6.6% of our purchases while our third largest vendor represented approximately 7.9% and 9.3% of our purchases for Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008, respectively.
Accrued Expenses. On a monthly basis, we estimate certain materialsignificant expenses in an effort to record those expenses in the period incurred. Our most materialsignificant estimates relate to payroll and payroll tax expenses, property taxes, insurance-related expenses and utility expenses. Estimates are primarily based on current activity and historical results and are adjusted as our estimates change. Differences in ourDetermination of estimates and assumptions could result in an accrual materially different from the accrual calculated. Historically, the differences in these accruals have not had a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.for accrued expenses requires significant judgment.
Income Taxes. We estimate the annual tax rate based on projected taxable income for the full year and record a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the anticipated annual rate. As the year progresses, we refine the estimates of the year’s taxable income as new information becomes available, including year-to-date financial results. This continual estimation process often results in a change to our expected effective tax rate for the year. When this occurs, we adjust the income tax provision during the quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date provision reflects the expected annual tax rate. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax position and changes in estimates could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Uncertain Tax Positions: We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FINFASB Interpretation No. 48.48 (FIN No. 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. As such, we are required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As such, changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income.operations. See Note“Part II, Item 8, to the Consolidated Financial Statements “IncomeNote 8 – Income Taxes”, for additional detail on our uncertain tax positions.
Litigation Accruals. Estimated amounts for claims that are probable and can be reasonably estimated are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The likelihood of a material change in these estimated accruals would be dependent on new claims as they may arise and the favorable or unfavorable outcome of a particular litigation. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to pending litigation and revise estimates as appropriate. Such revisions in estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining balance of long-lived assets and intangibles may be impaired and not recoverable. Our policy is to recognize any impairment loss on long-lived assets as a charge to current income when certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is assessed considering the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If estimated cash flows are insufficient to recover the investment, an impairment loss is recognized based on a comparison of the cost of the asset to fair value less any costs of disposition. Evaluation of asset impairment requires significant judgment and estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value at the date of grant of stock options granted under our stock option plans and stock purchase rights associated with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Volatility is estimated as of the date of grant or purchase date based on management’s estimate of the time period that captures the relative volatility of our stock. We useBeginning with the second quarter of Fiscal 2008, we base the risk-free interest rate on the annual continuously compounded risk-free rate with a term equal to the option’s expected term. Previously, we used the risk free interest rate on the date of grant or purchase date based on the U.S. Treasury rate with maturities approximating the expected lives of our options. The effects on net income and earnings per sharesshare (EPS) of stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, calculated using the fair value of stock options and stock purchase rights in accordance with the Black-Scholes options-pricing model are not necessarily representative of the effects of our results of operations in the future. In addition, the compensation expense utilizes an option-pricing model developed for traded options with relatively short lives. Our stock option grants have a life of up to ten years and are not transferable. Therefore, the actual fair value of a stock option grant may be different from our estimates. We believe that our estimates incorporate all relevant information and represent a reasonable approximation in light of the difficulties involved in valuing non-traded stock options. All estimates and assumptions are regularly evaluated and updated when applicable.
Insurance Accruals. We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks including employee-related health benefits, a portion of which is paid by our employees, workers’ compensation and general liability. The estimates and accruals for thesethe liabilities associated with these risks are regularly evaluated for adequacy based on the most current available information, including historical claims experience and expected future claims costs.
Operating Leases. We lease our retail stores and distribution center under operating leases. Many lease agreements contain rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and/or contingent rent provisions. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, including cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. We use a time period for our straight-line rent expense calculation that equals or exceeds the time period used for depreciation. In addition, the commencement date of the lease term is the earlier of the date when we become legally obligated for the rent payments or the date when we take possession of the building for initial setup of fixtures and merchandise.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and for our stock repurchase program, and therefore do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future decision to declare or pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (See(see “Part II, Item 9A)9A, Controls and Procedures”).
Quarterly and Seasonal Fluctuations
We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating income. Our netresults of operations. Customer buying patterns around the spring sales period and operating income are typicallythe holiday season historically result in higher in thefirst and fourth quarter due to sales increases during the holiday selling season. However, the seasonal fluctuations are mitigated by the strong product demand in the spring and back-to-school sales periods. Ournet sales. In addition, our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing of new store openings, the amount and timing of net sales contributed by new stores, the level of pre-opening expenses associated with new stores, the relative proportion of new stores to mature stores, merchandise mix the relative proportion of stores represented by each of our three store concepts and demand for apparel and accessories driven by local interest in sporting events.
Although our operations are influenced by general economic conditions, we do not believe that, historically, inflation has had a material impact on our results of operations as we are generally able to pass along inflationary increases in costs to our customers. However, in recent periods, we have experienced an impact on overall sales due to a consumer spending slowdown spawned byattributable to volatile fuel prices, higher gas pricesunemployment, falling equity and a slump inreal estate values and the housing market.limited availability of credit.
Our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to market risk from interest rate fluctuations on our credit facilities, which bear an interest at ratesrate that varyvaries with LIBOR, prime or quoted costfixed rates. We have cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions that are in excess of funds rates. Duringfederally insured limits per institution. With the majoritycurrent financial environment and the instability of Fiscal 2008,financial institutions, we had only one facilitycannot be assured that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million. In August 2007, we renewed this facility and increased the allowed borrowings to $30.0 million. During the majority of Fiscal 2007 and all of Fiscal 2006, we had two operating facilities allowing combined borrowings up to $25.0 million. Effective November 2006, we elected to renew only one facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and renewed annually.
In February 2008, subsequent towill not experience losses on our fiscal year end, we added another facility which allows borrowings up to $50.0 million which we intend to use for our stock repurchase program. The new facility expires in December 2008 and is renewable at that time. Interest rates on this facility vary with the British Bankers Association (BBA) LIBOR rate.deposits.
At the end of Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, we had no borrowings outstanding under any credit facility. There were 348 days during the fifty-two weeks ended January 31, 2009, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facilities for an average borrowing of $23.2 million. During Fiscal 2009, the maximum amount outstanding against these agreements was $47.1 million and the weighted average interest rate was 2.85%.
There were 106 days during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facility for an average and maximum borrowing of $7.8 million. During Fiscal 2008, the maximum amount outstanding against these agreements wasmillion and $18.4 million, respectively, and the weightedan average interest rate wasof 5.64%. There were twenty-four days during the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facilities for an average and maximum borrowing of $2.5 million and $5.1 million, respectively, and an average interest rate of 6.12%. At no time during the fifty-two weeks ended January 28, 2006, did we incur borrowings against our credit facility.
A 10% increase or decrease in market interest rates would not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The following consolidated financial statements and supplementary data of our Company are included in response to this item:
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hibbett Sports, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ investment, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
AsEffective February 4, 2007, as discussed in noteNote 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective February 4, 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventoryinventories and, as discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 29, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based payments.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of America.accounting principles. Also in our opinion, Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
April 1, 2008March 31, 2009
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
| ASSETS | February 2, 2008 | | February 3, 2007 | | January 31, 2009 | | | February 2, 2008 | |
| Current Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,742 | | | $ | 30,367 | | | $ | 20,650 | | | $ | 10,742 | |
| Short-term investments | | 191 | | | - | | | | 191 | | | | 191 | |
| Trade receivables, net | | 1,899 | | | 1,585 | | | | 2,624 | | | | 1,899 | |
| Accounts receivable, other | | 3,676 | | | 3,066 | | | | 2,764 | | | | 3,676 | |
| Inventories | | 141,406 | | | 125,240 | | | | 151,776 | | | | 141,406 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other | | 5,348 | | | 5,024 | | | | 3,822 | | | | 5,348 | |
| Deferred income taxes, net | | 2,725 | | | | 1,607 | | | | 3,938 | | | | 2,725 | |
| Total current assets | | 165,987 | | | | 166,889 | | | | 185,765 | | | | 165,987 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property and Equipment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Land and building | | 245 | | | 245 | | | | 245 | | | | 245 | |
| Equipment | | 40,338 | | | 32,946 | | | | 44,171 | | | | 40,338 | |
| Furniture and fixtures | | 20,991 | | | 18,846 | | | | 23,280 | | | | 20,991 | |
| Leasehold improvements | | 57,599 | | | 50,767 | | | | 61,152 | | | | 57,599 | |
| Construction in progress | | 2,564 | | | | 4,417 | | | | 2,776 | | | | 2,564 | |
| | | 121,737 | | | 107,221 | | | | 131,624 | | | | 121,737 | |
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | 75,232 | | | | 64,648 | | | | 86,315 | | | | 75,232 | |
| Total property and equipment | | 46,505 | | | | 42,573 | | |
| Net property and equipment | | | | 45,309 | | | | 46,505 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-current Assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred income taxes | | 3,780 | | | 3,217 | | | | 3,481 | | | | 3,780 | |
| Other, net | | 462 | | | | 174 | | |
| Total non-current assets | | 4,242 | | | | 3,391 | | |
| Other assets, net | | | | 532 | | | | 462 | |
| Total Assets | $ | 216,734 | | | $ | 212,853 | | | $ | 235,087 | | | $ | 216,734 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' INVESTMENT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 64,125 | | | $ | 42,016 | | | $ | 64,460 | | | $ | 64,125 | |
| Accrued income taxes | | 688 | | | 5,338 | | | | - | | | | 688 | |
| Accrued payroll expense | | 4,432 | | | 6,592 | | |
| Accrued payroll expenses | | | | 7,149 | | | | 4,432 | |
| Deferred rent | | 4,379 | | | 4,228 | | | | 4,445 | | | | 4,379 | |
| Other accrued expense | | 2,980 | | | | 2,287 | | |
| Other accrued expenses | | | | 2,656 | | | | 2,980 | |
| Total current liabilities | | 76,604 | | | | 60,461 | | | | 78,710 | | | | 76,604 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred rent | | 18,012 | | | 15,715 | | | | 16,543 | | | | 18,012 | |
| Accrued income taxes | | 2,968 | | | - | | |
| Other | | 95 | | | | 36 | | |
| Total non-current liabilities | | 21,075 | | | | 15,751 | | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | | 2,957 | | | | 2,968 | |
| Other liabilities, net | | | | 302 | | | | 95 | |
| Total liabilities | | | | 98,512 | | | | 97,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stockholders' Investment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| no shares issued | | - | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 36,162,201 and 36,047,732 shares issued at February 2, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
| and February 3, 2007, respectively | | 362 | | | 360 | | |
36,304,735 and 36,162,201 shares issued at January 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | |
| and February 2, 2008, respectively | | | | 363 | | | | 362 | |
| Paid-in capital | | 87,142 | | | 81,916 | | | | 92,153 | | | | 87,142 | |
| Retained earnings | | 181,555 | | | 151,697 | | | | 211,003 | | | | 181,555 | |
| Treasury stock at cost; 6,723,113 and 4,306,413 shares repurchased | | | | | | | |
| at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively | | (150,004 | ) | | | (97,332 | ) | |
| Treasury stock, at cost; 7,761,813 and 6,723,113 shares repurchased | | | | | | | | | |
| at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively | | | | (166,944 | ) | | | (150,004 | ) |
| Total stockholders' investment | | 119,055 | | | | 136,641 | | | | 136,575 | | | | 119,055 | |
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment | $ | 216,734 | | | $ | 212,853 | | | $ | 235,087 | | | $ | 216,734 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
| | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | February 2, 2008 | | | February 3, 2007 | | | January 28, 2006 | |
| | (52 weeks) | | | (53 weeks) | | | (52 weeks) | |
| Net sales | $ | 520,720 | | | $ | 512,094 | | | $ | 440,269 | |
| Cost of goods sold, including distribution | | | | | | | | | | | |
| center and store occupancy costs | | 351,876 | | | | 338,963 | | | | 293,368 | |
| Gross profit | | 168,844 | | | | 173,131 | | | | 146,901 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Store operating, selling and administrative | | | | | | | | | | | |
| expenses | | 108,463 | | | | 100,461 | | | | 85,060 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 12,154 | | | | 10,932 | | | | 10,119 | |
| Operating income | | 48,227 | | | | 61,738 | | | | 51,722 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | | 582 | | | | 906 | | | | 1,170 | |
| Interest expense | | 151 | | | | 30 | | | | 24 | |
| Interest income, net | | 431 | | | | 876 | | | | 1,146 | |
| Income before provision for income taxes | | 48,658 | | | | 62,614 | | | | 52,868 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Provision for income taxes | | 18,329 | | | | 24,541 | | | | 19,244 | |
| Net income | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | | | $ | 33,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 1.19 | | | $ | 1.00 | |
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 0.98 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | 31,049,058 | | | | 32,094,127 | | | | 33,605,568 | |
| Diluted | | 31,525,050 | | | | 32,619,839 | | | | 34,393,026 | |
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | January 31, 2009 (52 weeks) | | | February 2, 2008 (52 weeks) | | | February 3, 2007 (53 weeks) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | | $ | 564,188 | | | $ | 520,720 | | | $ | 512,094 | |
| Cost of goods sold, including distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| center and store occupancy costs | | | 378,817 | | | | 351,876 | | | | 338,963 | |
| Gross profit | | | 185,371 | | | | 168,844 | | | | 173,131 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Store operating, selling and administrative | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| expenses | | | 123,075 | | | | 108,463 | | | | 100,461 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,324 | | | | 12,154 | | | | 10,932 | |
| Operating income | | | 47,972 | | | | 48,227 | | | | 61,738 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | | | 41 | | | | 582 | | | | 906 | |
| Interest expense | | | (660 | ) | | | (151 | ) | | | (30 | ) |
| Interest (expense) income, net | | | (619 | ) | | | 431 | | | | 876 | |
| Income before provision for income taxes | | | 47,353 | | | | 48,658 | | | | 62,614 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Provision for income taxes | | | 17,905 | | | | 18,329 | | | | 24,541 | |
| Net income | | $ | 29,448 | | | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | | $ | 1.03 | | | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 1.19 | |
| Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 1.02 | | | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 1.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | 28,547,435 | | | | 31,049,058 | | | | 32,094,127 | |
| Diluted | | | 28,953,696 | | | | 31,525,050 | | | | 32,619,839 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except share information)
| | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | January 31, 2009 | | | February 2, 2008 | | | February 3, 2007 | |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | | | $ | 33,624 | | | $ | 29,448 | | | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 12,154 | | | 10,932 | | | 10,119 | | | | 14,324 | | | | 12,154 | | | | 10,932 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (benefit), net | | 673 | | | (1,073 | ) | | (1,918 | ) | |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) expense, net | | | | (925 | ) | | | 673 | | | | (1,073 | ) |
| Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises | | (520 | ) | | (1,232 | ) | | - | | | | (388 | ) | | | (520 | ) | | | (1,232 | ) |
| Loss on disposal of assets, net | | 230 | | | 370 | | | 465 | | |
| Loss on disposal and write-down of assets, net | | | | 513 | | | | 230 | | | | 370 | |
| Stock-based compensation | | 3,677 | | | 2,837 | | | 15 | | | | 3,556 | | | | 3,677 | | | | 2,837 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade receivables, net | | (314 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (263 | ) | | | (724 | ) | | | (314 | ) | | | (55 | ) |
| Accounts receivable, other | | (610 | ) | | 149 | | | 375 | | | | 912 | | | | (610 | ) | | | 149 | |
| Inventories | | (16,022 | ) | | (16,378 | ) | | (5,853 | ) | | | (10,369 | ) | | | (16,022 | ) | | | (16,378 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | (326 | ) | | (3,530 | ) | | (501 | ) | | | 1,525 | | | | (326 | ) | | | (3,530 | ) |
| Accrued and refundable income taxes | | (4,154 | ) | | 6,005 | | | 823 | | |
| Other non-current assets | | (288 | ) | | (19 | ) | | (15 | ) | |
| Accrued income taxes | | | | (476 | ) | | | (4,154 | ) | | | 6,005 | |
| Other assets, non-current | | | | 71 | | | | (288 | ) | | | (19 | ) |
| Accounts payable | | 22,109 | | | (3,913 | ) | | (4,259 | ) | | | 336 | | | | 22,109 | | | | (3,913 | ) |
| Deferred rent, non-current | | 2,296 | | | 1,513 | | | 3,478 | | | | (1,469 | ) | | | 2,296 | | | | 1,513 | |
| Accrued expenses | | (1,212 | ) | | | 2,783 | | | | 1,971 | | |
| Accrued expenses and other | | | | 2,663 | | | | (1,212 | ) | | | 2,783 | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | 48,022 | | | | 36,462 | | | | 38,061 | | | | 38,997 | | | | 48,022 | | | | 36,462 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Purchase) sale of short-term investments, net | | (191 | ) | | 13,227 | | | (13,227 | ) | |
| (Purchase) sale of investments, net | | | | (141 | ) | | | (191 | ) | | | 13,227 | |
| Capital expenditures | | (16,376 | ) | | (16,278 | ) | | (15,348 | ) | | | (13,697 | ) | | | (16,376 | ) | | | (16,278 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | 18 | | | | 54 | | | | 43 | | | | 57 | | | | 18 | | | | 54 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | (16,549 | ) | | | (2,997 | ) | | | (28,532 | ) | | | (13,781 | ) | | | (16,549 | ) | | | (2,997 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash used for stock repurchases | | (52,672 | ) | | (32,958 | ) | | (45,263 | ) | | | (16,940 | ) | | | (52,672 | ) | | | (32,958 | ) |
| Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises | | 520 | | | 1,232 | | | - | | | | 388 | | | | 520 | | | | 1,232 | |
| Proceeds from options exercised and purchase of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| shares under the employee stock purchase plan | | 1,054 | | | | 2,684 | | | | 3,336 | | | | 1,244 | | | | 1,054 | | | | 2,684 | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | | (51,098 | ) | | | (29,042 | ) | | | (41,927 | ) | | | (15,308 | ) | | | (51,098 | ) | | | (29,042 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | (19,625 | ) | | 4,423 | | | (32,398 | ) | |
| Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | | 9,908 | | | | (19,625 | ) | | | 4,423 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year | | 30,367 | | | | 25,944 | | | | 58,342 | | | | 10,742 | | | | 30,367 | | | | 25,944 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year | $ | 10,742 | | | $ | 30,367 | | | $ | 25,944 | | | $ | 20,650 | | | $ | 10,742 | | | $ | 30,367 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest | $ | 151 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 659 | | | $ | 151 | | | $ | 30 | |
| Income taxes, net of refunds | $ | 22,031 | | | $ | 19,608 | | | $ | 20,338 | | | $ | 21,162 | | | $ | 22,031 | | | $ | 19,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred board compensation | $ | 33 | | | $ | 31 | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 33 | | | $ | 31 | |
| Shares awarded to satisfy deferred board compensation | | 1,306 | | | | 1,142 | | | | 581 | | | | 664 | | | | 1,306 | | | | 1,142 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except share information)
| | Common Stock | | | | | | | Treasury Stock | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Amount | | | Paid-In Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Number of Shares | | Amount | | Total Stockholders' Investment |
| Balance-January 29, 2005 | | 35,232,998 | | $ | 352 | | | $ | 68,798 | | | $ | 80,000 | | | | 1,268,100 | | $ | (19,111 | ) | | $ | 130,039 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | 33,624 | | | | | | | | | | | 33,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit $3,023 | | 501,754 | | | 5 | | | | 6,368 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,373 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,859,600 | | | (45,263 | ) | | | (45,263 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-January 28, 2006 | | 35,734,752 | | | 357 | | | | 75,166 | | | | 113,624 | | | | 3,127,700 | | | (64,374 | ) | | | 124,773 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | 38,073 | | | | | | | | | | | 38,073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit $2,539 | | 312,980 | | | 3 | | | | 5,220 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,223 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjustment to income tax benefit from exercises of employee stock options | | | | | | | | | (1,307 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,307 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,178,713 | | | (32,958 | ) | | | (32,958 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | | | 2,837 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,837 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-February 3, 2007 | | 36,047,732 | | | 360 | | | | 81,916 | | | | 151,697 | | | | 4,306,413 | | | (97,332 | ) | | | 136,641 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | 30,329 | | | | | | | | | | | 30,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative effect of adopting FIN No. 48 | | | | | | | | | | | | | (554 | ) | | | | | | | | | | (554 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | 83 | | | | | | | | | | | 83 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options, net of tax benefit $275 | | 114,469 | | | 2 | | | | 1,549 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,551 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,416,700 | | | (52,672 | ) | | | (52,672 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | | | 3,677 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,677 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-February 2, 2008 | | 36,162,201 | | $ | 362 | | | $ | 87,142 | | | $ | 181,555 | | | | 6,723,113 | | $ | (150,004 | ) | | $ | 119,055 | |
| | Common Stock | | | | | | | | Treasury Stock | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Amount | | Paid-In Capital | | | Retained Earnings | | | Number of Shares | | Amount | | | Total Stockholders' Investment | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-January 28, 2006 | | 35,734,752 | | | $ | 357 | | $ | 75,166 | | | $ | 113,624 | | | | 3,127,700 | | $ | (64,374 | ) | | $ | 124,773 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | 38,073 | | | | | | | | | | | 38,073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $2,539 | | 312,980 | | | | 3 | | | 5,220 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,223 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjustment to income tax benefit from exercises of employee stock options | | | | | | | | | (1,307 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,307 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,178,713 | | | (32,958 | ) | | | (32,958 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | | | 2,837 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,837 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-February 3, 2007 | | 36,047,732 | | | | 360 | | | 81,916 | | | | 151,697 | | | | 4,306,413 | | | (97,332 | ) | | | 136,641 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | 30,329 | | | | | | | | | | | 30,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative effect of adopting FIN No. 48 | | | | | | | | | | | | | (554 | ) | | | | | | | | | | (554 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | 83 | | | | | | | | | | | 83 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $275 | | 114,469 | | | | 2 | | | 1,549 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,551 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,416,700 | | | (52,672 | ) | | | (52,672 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | | | 3,677 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,677 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-February 2, 2008 | | 36,162,201 | | | | 362 | | | 87,142 | | | | 181,555 | | | | 6,723,113 | | | (150,004 | ) | | | 119,055 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | 29,448 | | | | | | | | | | | 29,448 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $212 | | 142,534 | | | | 1 | | | 1,425 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,426 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax shortfall on release of restricted stock and option exercises | | | | | | | | | (176 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (176 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjustment to income tax benefit from exercises of employee stock options | | | | | | | | | 206 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 206 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of shares under the stock repurchase program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,037,700 | | | (16,940 | ) | | | (16,940 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | | | 3,556 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,556 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-January 31, 2009 | | 36,304,735 | | | $ | 363 | | $ | 92,153 | | | $ | 211,003 | | | | 7,761,813 | | $ | (166,944 | ) | | $ | 136,575 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business
Hibbett Sports, Inc. is an operator of sporting goods retail stores in small to mid-sized markets predominately in the Sunbelt,Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest regions of the lower Midwest.United States. Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31 of each year. The consolidated statementstatements of operations for fiscal yearyears ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, includesinclude 52 weeks of operations. The consolidated statement of operations for fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 includes 53 weeks of operations while the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 includes 52 weeks of operations. Our merchandise assortment features a core selection of brand name merchandise emphasizing individual team sports equipment, athletic and fashion apparel and footwear related accessories. We complement this core assortment with a selection of localized apparel and accessories designed to appeal to a wide range of customers within each market.
Accounting ChangesChange
Change in Accounting Principle – Inventories
On February 4, 2007, the first day of Fiscal 2008, we changed our inventory valuation method. Previously, inventories were principally valued at the lower of cost or market using the retail method. Commencing in Fiscal 2008, inventories are principally valued at the lower of cost or market using the weighted-averageweighted average cost method.
SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections – A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”, requires a retrospective application of changes in accounting principles. However, the effect of this change in accounting principle for periods prior to Fiscal 2008 is not determinable, as the period-specificperiod specific information required to value inventory using the weighted-averageweighted average cost method is not available for periods prior to February 4, 2007.Fiscal 2008. This change was recognized as a net increase of $143,000 to inventory, an increase of $60,000 to deferred income tax liabilities and a cumulative effect to retained earnings of $83,000. This change in valuation method did not have a material impact on net income or diluted earnings per share.
We believe the new accounting method of weighted-averageweighted average cost is preferable to the retail method of inventory valuation because it will produce more accurate inventory amounts reported in the balance sheet and, in turn, more accurate cost of sales in the income statement. The new JDA Merchandising System,merchandising system, implemented in Fiscal 2008, has facilitated our ability to value our inventory on the weighted-averageweighted average cost method.
Adoption of FIN No. 48
On February 4, 2007,we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN No. 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” by prescribing the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under FIN No. 48, the financial statement effects of a tax position should initially be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should initially and subsequently be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater then 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority.
As a result of implementing FIN No. 48, we increased the liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $3.8 million, increased deferred tax assets by $3.2 million and reduced retained earnings as of February 4, 2007, by $0.6 million. Our total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of February 4, 2007 amounted to $5.7 million. As of February 2, 2008, our total liability for unrecognized tax benefits amounted to $3.0 million of which $1.0 million would affect the effective tax rate if recognized.
We filed for an accounting method change with the Internal Revenue Service before the end of Fiscal 2008 which resulted in a reduction of approximately $2.9 million of our liability for prior year unrecognized tax benefits. We expect to recognize this liability ratably over the next four years.
We classify interest and penalties recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. The associated amounts included in our total liability for unrecognized tax benefits were $345,000 as of February 2, 2008 and $567,000 as of February 3, 2007.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of our Company include its accounts and the accounts of all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Occasionally, certain reclassifications are made to conform previously reported data to the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on total assets, net income or stockholders’ investment.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of Americaaccounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (1) affect:
| · | the reported amounts of certain assets, including inventories and property and equipment; |
| · | the reported amounts of certain liabilities, including legal and other accruals; and |
| · | the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reporting period. |
The assumptions used by management in future estimates could change significantly due to changes in circumstances and liabilities and disclosure of certain contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actualactual results could differ from those estimates.
Reportable Segments
Given the economic characteristics of the store formats, the similar nature of products offered for sale, the type of customers, the methods of distribution and how our Company is managed, our operations constitute only one reportable segment. Revenues from external customers by product category are impractical for us to report.
Customers
No customer accounted for more than 5.0% of our net sales during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006.2007.
Vendor Arrangements
We enter into arrangements with some of our vendors that entitle us to a partial refund of the cost of merchandise purchased during the year or reimbursement of certain costs we incur to advertise or otherwise promote their product. The volume based rebates, supported by a vendor agreement,agreements, are estimated throughout the year and reduce the cost of inventory and cost of goods sold during the year. This estimate is regularly monitored and adjusted for current or anticipated changes in purchase levels and for sales activity.
We also receive vendor supportconsideration from vendors through a variety of other programs, including markdown reimbursements, vendor compliance charges and defective merchandise.merchandise and return-to-vendor credits. If the payment is a reimbursement for costs incurred, it is recognized as an offset against those related costs; otherwise, it is treated as a reduction to the cost of merchandise. Markdown reimbursements related to merchandise that has been sold are negotiated by our merchandising teams and are credited directly to Costcost of Goods Soldgoods sold in the period received. If vendor funds are received prior to merchandise being sold, they are recorded as a reduction of merchandise cost.
Cost of Goods Sold
We include inbound freight charges, merchandise purchases, store occupancy costs and a portion of our distribution costs related to our retail business in cost of goods sold. Outbound freight charges associated with moving merchandise to and between stores are included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses.
Advertising
We expense advertising costs when incurred. We participate in various advertising and marketing cooperative programs with our vendors, who, under these programs, reimburse us for certain costs incurred. A receivable for cooperative advertising to be reimbursed is recorded as a decrease to expense as advertisements are run.
The following table presents the components of our advertising expense (in thousands):
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | |
| | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| Gross advertising costs | | $ | 6,519 | | | $ | 5,194 | | | $ | 4,727 | | | $ | 6,145 | | | $ | 6,519 | | | $ | 5,194 | |
| Advertising reimbursements | | | (3,609 | ) | | | (3,225 | ) | | | (2,935 | ) | | | (3,054 | ) | | | (3,609 | ) | | | (3,225 | ) |
| Net advertising costs | | $ | 2,910 | | | $ | 1,969 | | | $ | 1,792 | | | $ | 3,091 | | | $ | 2,910 | | | $ | 1,969 | |
Stock Repurchase Program
In August 2004, our Board of Directors (the Board) authorized a plan to repurchase our common stock. The Board has subsequently authorized increases to this plan with a current authorization effective November 2007 of $250.0 million. Stock repurchases may be made in the open market or in negotiated transactions until January 30, 2010, with the amount and timing of repurchases dependent on market conditions and at the discretion of our management.
We repurchased 1,038,700, 2,416,700 1,178,713 and 1,859,6001,178,713 shares of our common stock during years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, and January 28, 2006, respectively, at a cost of approximately $16.9 million, $52.7 million $33.0 million and $45.3$33.0 million, respectively. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we had repurchased a total of 6,723,1137,761,813 shares of our common stock at an approximate cost of $150.0$166.9 million. We have approximately $100.0$83.1 million available for stock repurchase as of February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009. We do not have plans to repurchase any of our common stock in the near future.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less, including commercial paper and money market funds, to be cash equivalents. We place our cash equivalents in high credit quality financial institutions. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the consolidated balance sheet exceeds the FDIC insurance limits per institution. Amounts due from third party credit card processors for the settlement of debit and credit card transactions are included as cash equivalents as they are generally collected within three business days. Cash equivalents related to credit and debit card transactions at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 were $2.4$2.7 million and $2.2$2.4 million, respectively.
Short-Term Investments
All investments with original maturities of greater than 90 days are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” We determine the appropriate classification at the time of purchase. We held approximately $191,000$0.2 million of short-term investments in securities at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008. We did not hold any
Our short-term investments in securities at February 3, 2007. Our investments in securities primarily consisted of municipal bonds classified as available-for-sale. Investments in these securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Despite the long-term nature of their stated contractual maturities, we believe there is a ready liquid market for these securities. As a result, there are no cumulative gross unrealized holding gains (losses) or gross realized gains (losses) from our securities.short-term investments. All income generated from these securities is recorded as interest income. We continually evaluate our short-term investments for other than temporary impairment.
We also hold investments in trust for the Hibbett Sports, Inc. Supplemental 401(k) Plan (Supplemental Plan) which are trading securities and are classified as a long-term asset on the consolidated balance sheet included in other assets, net. At January 31, 2009, we had approximately $0.1 million of investments included in other assets, net. We did not hold any such investments at February 2, 2008. Unrealized holding gains or losses are inconsequential.
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts due to us from sales to educational institutions and youth associations. We do not require collateral and we maintain an allowance for potential uncollectible accounts based on an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable at the date of the financial statements, historical losses and existing economic conditions, when relevant. The allowance for doubtful accounts at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 was $50,000 and February 3, 2007 was $46,000, and $34,000, respectively.
Other accounts receivable consisted primarily of tenant allowances due from landlords and cooperative advertising due from vendors, all of which are deemed to be collectible.
Inventories and Valuation
Lower of Cost or Market: Beginning in Fiscal 2008, inventoriesInventories are valued using the lower of weighted-averageweighted average cost or market method. Market is determined based on estimated net realizable value. We regularly review inventories to determine if the carrying value exceeds realizable value, and we record a reservean accrual to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value as necessary. We account for obsolescence as part of our lower of cost or market reserveaccrual based on historical trends and specific identification. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, the reserveaccrual was $2.0 million and $1.5 million. There was no amount reserved as of February 3, 2007.million, respectively. A determination of net realizable value requires significant judgment and estimates.
Previously, we valued inventories at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method of accounting, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis and market based on the lower of replacement cost or estimated realizable value. We believe the cost method is preferable as compared to the retail method because it will increase the organizational focus on the actual margin realized on each sale.
Shrinkage: We accrue for inventory shrinkage based on the actual historical shrink results of our most recent physical inventories. These estimates are compared to actual results as physical inventory counts are performed and reconciled to the general ledger. Store counts are typically performed on a cyclical basis and the distribution center’s counts are performed mid-year and in late December or early January every year. In Fiscal 2009, the distribution center’s counts were performed quarterly. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the reserveaccrual was $1.4 million and $0.9 million, and $2.0 million, respectively.
Inventory Purchase Concentration: Our business is dependent to a significant degree upon close relationships with our vendors. Our largest vendor, Nike, represented approximately 48.5%51.4%, 47.3%48.5% and 44.9%47.3% of our purchases in Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively. Our next largest vendor in Fiscal 20082009 represented approximately 9.3%8.4%, 9.4%6.6% and 11.3%4.8% of our purchases in Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively. Our third largest vendor in Fiscal 20082009 represented approximately 6.6%7.9%, 4.8%9.3% and 3.2%9.4% of our purchases in Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation on assets is principally provided using the straight-line method over their estimated service lives (3 to 5 years for equipment, 7 years for furniture and fixtures and 39 years for buildings) or, in the case of leasehold improvements, the shorter of the initial term of the underlying leases or the estimated economic lives of the improvements (typically 3 to 10 years). We continually reassess the remaining useful life of leasehold improvements in light of store closing plans.
Construction in progress is comprised primarily of property and equipment related to unopened stores and costs associated with technology upgrades at period end. At fiscal year ended February 3, 2007,January 31, 2009, construction in progress was comprised mostly of system costs associated with the JDA Merchandising System which was implemented on February 4, 2007.a conveyor project in our distribution center and technology projects.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from property and equipment and the related gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use,” provides guidance on accounting for such costs. SOP 98-1 requires computer software costs that are incurred in the preliminary project stage to be expensed as incurred. Once the capitalization criteria of SOP 98-1 have been met, directly attributable development costs should be capitalized. It also provides that upgrade and maintenance costs should be expensed. Our treatment of such costs is consistent with SOP 98-1, with the costs capitalized being amortized over the expected useful life of the software. For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008, there were no costs capitalized under SOP 98-1. For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, we capitalized approximately $120,000 under SOP 98-1 associated with the implementation of our new merchandising software.36
Deferred Rent
Deferred rent primarily consists of step rent and allowances from landlords related to our leased properties. Step rent represents the difference between actual operating lease payments due and straight-line rent expense, which is recorded by the Company over the term of the lease, including the build-out period. This amount is recorded as deferred rent in the early years of the lease, when cash payments are generally lower than straight-line rent expense, and reduced in the later years of the lease when payments begin to exceed the straight-line rent expense. Landlord allowances are generally comprised of amounts received and/or promised to us by landlords and may be received in the form of cash or free rent. We record a receivable from the landlord and a deferred rent liability when the allowances are earned. This deferred rent is amortized into income (through lower rent expense) over the term (including the pre-opening build-out period) of the applicable lease, and the receivable is reduced as amounts are received from the landlord.
On our consolidated statements of cash flows, the current and long-term portions of landlord allowances are included as changes in cash flows from operations. The current portion is included as a change in accrued expenses and the long-term portion is included as a change in deferred rent, non-current. The liability for the current portion of unamortized landlord allowances was $4.0 million and $3.9 million at January 31, 2009 and $3.1 million at February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively. The liability for the long-term portion of unamortized landlord allowances was $13.1 million and $14.6 million at January 31, 2009 and $12.6 million at February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively. TheWe estimate the non-cash portion of landlord allowances received is immaterial.was $0.8 million and $0.5 million in Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue, including gift card and layaway sales, in accordance with the SEC SABStaff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” as amended by SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.”
Retail merchandise sales occur on-site in our retail stores. Customers have the option of paying the full purchase price of the merchandise upon sale or paying a down payment and placing the merchandise on layaway. The customer may make further payments in installments, but the entire purchase price for merchandise placed on layaway must be received by the Companyus within 30 days. The down payment and any installments are recorded by us as short-term deferred revenue until the customer pays the entire purchase price for the merchandise. We recognize revenue at the time the customer takes possession of the merchandise.merchandise. Retail sales are recorded net of returns and discounts and exclude sales taxes.taxes.
In Fiscal 2009, we began a customer loyalty program, the MVP Rewards Program (Program), whereby customers enroll in the Program and receive points in a variety of ways that are automatically converted into reward certificates based on Program parameters that are subject to change. An estimate of the obligation related to the Program, based on estimated redemption rates, is recorded as a current liability and a reduction of net retail sales in the period earned by the customer. The current liability is reduced, and a corresponding amount is recognized in net retail sales, in the amount of and at the time of redemption of the reward certificate. At January 31, 2009, the amount recorded in current liabilities for reward certificates issued was inconsequential.
The cost of coupon sales incentives is recognized at the time the related revenue is recognized by the Company.recognized. Proceeds received from the issuance of gift cards are initially recorded as deferred revenue. Revenue is subsequently recognized at the time the customer redeems the gift cards and takes possession of the merchandise. Unredeemed gift cards are recorded as a current liability.
It is not our policy to take unclaimed layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards into income. For the years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, and January 28, 2006, there was no breakage revenue recorded in income. The deferred revenue liability for layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards was $2.4 million and $2.1 million at January 31, 2009 and $1.8 million at February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively. Any unrecognized breakage revenue is immaterial. We escheat unredeemed gift cards.
Store Opening and Closing Costs
New store opening costs, including pre-opening costs, are charged to expense as incurred. Store opening costs primarily include payroll expenses, training costs and straight-line rent expenses. All pre-opening costs are included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses as a part of operating expenses.
We consider individual store closings to be a normal part of operations and regularly review store performance against expectations. Costs associated with store closings are recognized at the time of closing or when a liability has been incurred.
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining balance of long-lived assets and intangibles may be impaired and not recoverable. Our policy is to recognize any impairment loss on long-lived assets as a charge to current income when certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is assessed considering the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If estimated cash flows are insufficient to recover the investment, an impairment loss is recognized based on a comparison of the cost of the asset to fair value less any costs of disposition. Evaluation of asset impairment requires significant judgment and estimates.
Self-InsuranceInsurance Accrual
We are self-insured for a significant portion of our health insurance. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by us are estimated, in part, by considering our historical claims. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from our assumptions. To minimize our potential exposure, we carry stop-loss insurance which reimburses us for losses over $100,000$0.1 million per covered person per year or $2.0 million per year in the aggregate. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the accrual for these liabilities was $450,000$0.6 million and $350,000,$0.5 million, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets.
We are also self-insured for our workers’ compensation and general liability insurance up to an established deductible with a cumulative stop loss. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the accrual for these liabilities (which is not discounted) was $200,000$0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets.
Sales Returns, net
Net sales returns were $19.6 million for Fiscal 2009, $18.3 million for Fiscal 2008 and $14.2 million for Fiscal 2007 and $12.1 million for Fiscal 2006.2007. The accrual for the effect of estimated returns on pre-tax income was $181,000$0.3 million and $124,000$0.2 million as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. Determination of the accrual for estimated returns requires significant judgment and estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amount approximatesEffective February 3, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, receivables and accounts payable, becausean asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The adoption of the short maturities of those instruments.SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
| · | Level I – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| · | Level II – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I, such as quoted prices for markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
| · | Level III – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. |
The table below segregates all financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value as of January 31, 2009 (in thousands):
| | | Level I | | | Level II | | | Level III | | | Total | |
| Short-term investments | | $ | 191 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 191 | |
| Long-term investments | | | 141 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 141 | |
| Total investments | | $ | 332 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 332 | |
In October 2008, The FASB issued FSP Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for that Asset is Not Active, which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities for which there is no active market or the principal market for such asset or liability is not active. This FSP was effective upon issuance and did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This statement identifies the sources for U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and lists the categories in descending order. An entity should follow the highest category of GAAP applicable for each of its accounting transactions. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to remove the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles from auditing standards. The SEC approved the PCAOB amendments on September 16, 2008, making SFAS No. 162 effective on November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why they use derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in purchased entities, measured at their fair values at the date of acquisition based upon the definition of fair value outlined in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. For us, SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for acquisitions beginning on and after February 1, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement 115.” This statement permits companies to elect to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value. At each reporting date subsequent to adoption, unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected must be reported in earnings. On February 3, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 159 was effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that began after November 15, 2007,and elected not to use fair value measurement on any assets or February 3, 2008 for our Company. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.liabilities under this statement.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expandsrequires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements; however, SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 isrequires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy, as defined. SFAS No. 157 may require companies to provide additional disclosures based on that hierarchy. This statement was to be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We implementedIn February 2008, FSP FAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, was issued which delayed the applicability of SFAS No. 157157’s fair value measurements to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities to those fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on February 3, 2008 anda recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of the adoptionprovisions of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effectimpact on our consolidated financial statements.
At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we had four stock-based compensation plans:
| | (a) | The Amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) provides that the Board of Directors may grant equity awards to certain employees of the Company at its discretion. The Incentive Plan was adopted effective July 1, 2005 and authorizes grants of equity awards of up to 1,233,159 authorized but unissued shares of common stock which includes 483,159 shares carried forward from the original 1996 Stock Option Plan (1996 Plan), as amended, plus an additional 750,000 shares approved for issuance effective July 1, 2005.stock. At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there were 1,011,202803,440 shares available for grant under the Incentive Plan. |
| | |
| | (b) | The Amended 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) allows for qualified employees to participate in the purchase of up to 204,794 shares of our common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price at the beginning or end of each quarterly stock purchase period. The ESPP was adopted effective July 1, 2005. At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there were 159,166134,265 shares available for purchase under the ESPP. |
| | |
| | (c) | The Amended 2005 Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred Plan) allows non-employee directors an election to defer all or a portion of their fees into stock units or stock options or cash.options. The Deferred Plan was adopted effective July 1, 2005 and authorizes grants of stock up to 112,500 authorized but unissued shares of common stock. At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there were 110,05283,185 shares available for grant under the Deferred Plan. |
| | |
| | (d) | The Amended 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan (DEP) provides for grants of equity awards to non-employee directors. The DEP was adopted effective June 1, 2006 and authorizes grants of equity awards of up to 672,975 authorized but unissued shares of common stock which includes 172,975 shares carried forward from the original Stock Plan for Outside Directors (Director Plan), plus an additional 500,000 shares approved for issuance effective June 1, 2006.stock. At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there were 635,730609,891 shares available for grant under the DEP. |
Effective January 29, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments,” using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the periods ended February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 included: (a) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 28, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and (b) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted on or after January 29, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. The fair value of each stock option was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with various assumptions used for new grants as described below. Compensation expense for new stock options and nonvested equity awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. In accordance with the modified prospective method, results for prior periods have not been restated.
Prior to January 29, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, no compensation cost for stock options was reflected in net earnings, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In addition, no compensation expense was recognized for common stock purchases under the ESPP.
The following table illustrates the pro-forma effect on net income and earnings per share for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended, to stock-based compensation (in thousands, except per share data):
| Net income, as reported | | $ | 33,624 | |
| | | | | |
| Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense, included in the determination of net income, net of tax | | | 61 | |
| | | | | |
| Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense, determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of tax | | | (3,778 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Net income, pro-forma | | $ | 29,907 | |
| | | | | |
| Earnings per share: | | | | |
| Basic - as reported | | $ | 1.00 | |
| Basic - pro-forma | | $ | 0.89 | |
| | | | | |
| Diluted - as reported | | $ | 0.98 | |
| Diluted - pro-forma | | $ | 0.87 | |
Our plans allow for a variety of equity awards including stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights and performance awards. As of February 2, 2008January 31, 2009, the Company had only granted awards in the form of stock options, and restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (PSAs). RSUs and options to purchase our common stock have been granted to officers, directors and key employees. Beginning with the adoption of the Incentive Plan, a greater proportion of the awards granted to employees, including executive employees, have been RSUs as opposed to stock options when compared to grants made in prior years. The annual grant made for Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008 to employees consisted solely of RSUs. We have also awarded RSUs that are performance-basedPSAs to our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers (NEOs) and expect the Compensation Committee of the Board will continue to grant more performance-based awardsPSAs to key employeesour NEOs in the future. The terms and vesting schedules for stock-based awards vary by type of grant and generally vest upon time-based conditions. Upon exercise, stock-based compensation awards are settled with authorized but unissued company stock. On May 30, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board awarded a grant of 19,900 non-qualified stock options to our Chief Executive Officer that vest equally over four years and have an eight year life.
The compensation cost that has been charged against income for these plans was as follows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 (in thousands):
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | February 2, | | | February 3, | | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense by type: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock options | | $ | 2,068 | | | $ | 2,104 | | | $ | 1,968 | | | $ | 2,068 | | | $ | 2,104 | |
| Restricted stock awards | | 1,479 | | | 603 | | | | 1,482 | | | | 1,479 | | | | 603 | |
| Employee stock purchase | | 97 | | | 99 | | | | 96 | | | | 97 | | | | 99 | |
| Director deferred compensation | | | 33 | | | | 31 | | | | 10 | | | | 33 | | | | 31 | |
| Total stock-based compensation expense | | 3,677 | | | 2,837 | | | | 3,556 | | | | 3,677 | | | | 2,837 | |
| Tax benefit recognized | | | 894 | | | | 549 | | |
| Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax | | $ | 2,783 | | | $ | 2,288 | | |
| Income tax benefit recognized | | | | 941 | | | | 894 | | | | 549 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense, net of income tax | | | $ | 2,615 | | | $ | 2,783 | | | $ | 2,288 | |
In accordance with SAB No. 107, “Share-Based Payment,” issued in March 2005, share-based plan expense has beenShare-based and deferred stock compensation expenses are included in store operating, selling and administrative expense since it is incentive compensation. Certain other deferred stock compensation plans are also reflected in store operating, selling and administrative expense.expenses. There is no capitalized stock-based compensation cost.
The income tax benefit recognized in our consolidated financial statements, as disclosed above, is based on the amount of compensation expense recorded for book purposes. The actual income tax benefit realized in our income tax return is based on the intrinsic value, or the excess of the market value over the exercise or purchase price, of stock options exercised and restricted stock awards vested during the period. The actual income tax benefit realized for the deductions considered on our income tax returns for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, was from option exercises, deferred stock releases and restricted stock releases and totaled $0.6 million. The actual income tax benefit realized for the deductions considered on our income tax returns for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, was from option exercises and totaled $0.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Stock Options
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant. During the period between July 2005 and December 2006, stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of grant. Vesting and expiration provisions vary between equity plans. Grants awarded to employees under the 1996 Plan, as amended,plans, but typically vest over a four or five year period in equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and typically expire on the eighth or tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Grants awarded to employees under the Incentive Plan vest over a four year period in equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire on the eighth anniversary of the date of grant with the exception of a grant made on August 18, 2005, whose provisions provided for the five year vesting schedule and ten year term described in the 1996 Plan. Grants awarded to outside directors under both the DEP and Deferred Plan vest immediately upon grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.
Following is the weighted average fair value of each option granted during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009. The fair value was estimated on the date of grant using the Black ScholesBlack-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for each period:
| | Quarter Ended |
| | May 3, | | August 2, | | November 1, | | January 31, |
| | 2008 | | 2008 | | 2008 | | 2009 |
| Grant date | March 14 | | March 18 | | March 31 | | May 30 | | June 30 | �� | September 30 | | December 31 |
| Weighted average fair value at date of grant | $5.92 | | $6.36 | | $6.67 | | $10.03 | | $9.18 | | $9.24 | | $8.76 |
| Expected option life (years) | 4.20 | | 4.20 | | 4.20 | | 5.07 | | 4.20 | | 4.76 | | 4.76 |
| Expected volatility | 50.61% | | 50.89% | | 51.68% | | 50.18% | | 50.38% | | 51.54% | | 68.07% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.12% | | 2.19% | | 2.27% | | 3.39% | | 3.14% | | 2.60% | | 1.40% |
| Dividend yield | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None |
| | |
| | Quarter 4 | | Quarter 3 | | Quarter 2 | | Quarter 1 |
| | 2/2/2008 | | 11/3/2007 | | 8/4/2007 | | 5/5/2007 |
| Grant date | | | 9/30/2007 | | 6/30/2007 | | 3/31/2007 | 3/19/2007 |
| Weighted average fair value at date of grant | $8.43 | | $9.56 | | $9.89 | | $10.68 | $10.56 |
| Expected option life (years) | 4.20 | | 4.20 | | 4.07 | | 4.07 | 4.07 |
| Expected volatility | 48.01% | | 41.07% | | 36.33% | | 39.22% | 39.22% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.39% | | 4.11% | | 5.00% | | 4.55% | 4.53% |
| Dividend yield | None | | None | | None | | None | None |
We calculate the expected term for our stock options based on historical employee exercise behavior. Historically, an increase in our stock price has led to a pattern of earlier exercise by employees. We also expected the reduction of the contractual term from 10 years to 8 years to facilitate a pattern of earlier exercise by employees and to contribute to a gradual decline in the average expected term in future periods. For the last two years, the Compensation Committee has awarded RSUs rather than options to our employees. With the absence of substantial new option grants, the expected term may increase slightly because it will be affected to a greater extent by director options which have a longer contractual life.
The volatility used to value stock options is based on historical volatility. We calculate historical volatility using an average calculation methodology based on daily price intervals as measured over the expected term of the option. We have consistently applied this methodology since our adoption of the original disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123.123, Accounting for Share-Based Compensation.
Beginning with awards granted in the second quarter of Fiscal 2008, we basedbase the risk-free interest rate on the annual continuously compounded risk-free rate with a term equal to the option’s expected term. Previously, we used the market yield on U.S. Treasury securities. While the difference between the two rates is minimal and has only a slight effect on the fair value calculation, we believe using the annual continuously compounded risk-free rate is more compliant with SFAS No. 123R.123R, Share-Based Payments. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero since we have no current plan to declare dividends.
Activity for our option plans during the fifty-two weeksfiscal year ended February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000's) | |
| Options outstanding at February 3, 2007 | | | 1,387,388 | | | $ | 15.46 | | | | | |
| Granted | | | 29,795 | | | | 27.71 | | | | | |
| Exercised | | | (96,007 | ) | | | 19.80 | | | | | |
| Forfeited, cancelled or expired | | | (37,418 | ) | | | 26.58 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options outstanding at February 2, 2008 | | | 1,283,758 | | | $ | 15.89 | | | 5.77 | | $ | 7,559 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercisable at February 2, 2008 | | | 825,921 | | | $ | 13.56 | | | 5.46 | | $ | 6,153 | |
| | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000's) | |
| Options outstanding at February 2, 2008 | | | 1,283,758 | | | $ | 15.89 | | | | 5.77 | | | $ | 7,559 | |
| Granted | | | 71,361 | | | | 16.63 | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercised | | | (89,041 | ) | | | 7.72 | | | | | | | | | |
| Forfeited, cancelled or expired | | | (5,910 | ) | | | 24.85 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options outstanding at January 31, 2009 | | | 1,260,168 | | | $ | 16.46 | | | | 5.06 | | | $ | 3,001 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercisable at January 31, 2009 | | | 1,014,458 | | | $ | 14.84 | | | | 4.89 | | | $ | 3,001 | |
The weighted average grant fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was $7.43, $10.39 and $12.83, respectively. The compensation expense included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was $2.0 million, $2.1 million in each yearand $2.1 million, respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit of $0.4 million, $0.3 million in each year.and $0.3 million, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006 was $1.2 million, $1.9 million and $7.1 million, and $8.4 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value and the grant price. The total cash received from these stock option exercises during Fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 and 2006 was $0.7 million, $0.9 million $2.3 million and $2.9$2.3 million, respectively. Excess income tax receiptsproceeds from stock option exercises are included in cash flows from financing activities as required by SFAS No. 123R. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there was $2.8$1.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-averageweighted average period of 2.01.2 years.
Restricted Stock and Performance-Based Awards
Restricted stock and performance-based awards are granted with a fair value equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant withgrant. All PSAs have been awarded in the exceptionform of those granted between August 2005 and December 2006 which were granted with a fair value equal to the closing market price of our commonrestricted stock on the last trading day preceding the date of grant.units. Compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period.period and, in the case of PSAs, at the estimated percent of achievement. Restricted stock awards generally cliff vest in four to five years from the date of grant.grant for those awards that are not performance-based. PSAs cliff vest in one to five years from the date of grant after achievement of stated performance criterion and upon meeting stated service conditions.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock awards activity under all of our plans during the fifty-two weeksfiscal year ended February 2, 2008:January 31, 2009:
| | | Number of Awards | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | | | Number of Awards | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
| Restricted stock awards outstanding at February 3, 2007 | | 87,923 | | | $ | 29.66 | | |
| Restricted stock awards outstanding at February 2, 2008 | | | | 143,046 | | | $ | 29.28 | |
| Granted | | 124,425 | | | 28.30 | | | | 231,255 | | | | 15.12 | |
| Vested | | - | | | - | | | | (24,900 | ) | | | 32.37 | |
| Forfeited, cancelled or expired | | | (69,302 | ) | | 28.01 | | | | (37,483 | ) | | | 17.53 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted stock awards outstanding at February 2, 2008 | | | 143,046 | | | $ | 29.28 | | |
| Restricted stock awards outstanding at January 31, 2009 | | | | 311,918 | | | $ | 19.95 | |
The weighted average grant date fair value of our RSUs granted was $15.12, $28.30 and $31.55 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007.2007, respectively. There were 231,255, 124,325 and 60,510 RSUs granted during Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively. The compensation expense included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007 was $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit of $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
As of February 2, 2008, no RSUs grantedJanuary 31, 2009, one restricted stock award of 24,900 units had vested.vested with an intrinsic value of $0.4 million. The total intrinsic value of our restricted stock awards outstanding and unvested at January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was $4.2 million, $2.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there was approximately $2.5$3.6 million of total unamortized unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.02.7 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company’s ESPP allows eligible employees the right to purchase shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value at the end of each calendar quarter (purchase date) or the beginning of each calendar quarter. Our employees purchased 25,263 shares of common stock at an average price of $14.11 per share through the ESPP for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009. Our employees purchased 18,462 shares of common stock at an average price of $21.25 per share during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008. The assumptions used in the option pricing model for the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008 were: (a) expected life of 3 months (.25 years); (b) volatility between 36.3% and 41.8%; (c) risk-free interest rate between 3.99% and 5.08%; and (d) dividend yield of 0.0%. The weighted average grant date fair value of ESPP options granted during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008 was $5.90.
During the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, our employees purchased 17,992 shares of common stock at an average price of $22.02 per share through the ESPP.
The assumptions used in the option pricing model for the fifty-three weeksfiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 were: (a) expected life of 3 months (.25 years); (b) volatility between 40.7% and 41.0%; (c) risk-free interest rate between 3.98% and 4.93%; and (d) dividend yield of 0.0%. The weighted average grant date fair value of ESPP options granted during the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007 was $5.93.were as follows:
| | Fiscal Year Ended |
| | January 31, | | February 2, | | February 3, |
| | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2007 |
| Weighted average fair value at date of grant | $4.35 | | $5.90 | | $5.93 |
| Expected life (years) | 0.25 | | 0.25 | | 0.25 |
| Expected volatility | 48.0% - 51.5% | | 36.3% - 41.8% | | 40.7% - 41.0% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.14% - 3.06% | | 3.99% - 5.08% | | 3.98% - 4.93% |
| Dividend yield | None | | None | | None |
The expense related to the ESPP was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the provisions of FASB Technical Bulletin (“FTB”)(FTB) No. 97-1, “Accounting under Statement 123 for Certain Employee Stock Purchase Plans with a Look-Back Option,” as amended by SFAS No. 123R. The compensation expense included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was approximately $97,000 and $99,000, respectively. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the ESPP was considered noncompensatory and no expense was recorded$0.1 million in the consolidated statement of operations.all three years.
Director Deferred Compensation
Under the Deferred Plan, non-employee directors can elect to defer all or a portion of their boardBoard and boardBoard committee fees into cash, stock options or deferred stock units. Those fees deferred into stock options are subject to the same provisions as provided for in the DEP and are expensed and accounted for accordingly. Director fees deferred into our common stock are calculated and expensed each calendar quarter by taking total fees earned during the calendar quarter and dividing by the closing price on the last day of the calendar quarter, rounded to the nearest whole share. The total annual retainer, boardBoard and boardBoard committee fees for non-employee directors that are not deferred into stock options, but which includes amounts deferred into stock units under the Deferred Plan, are expensed as incurred in all periods presented. A total of 664, 1,306 1,142 and 5811,142 stock units were deferred under this plan in Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, respectively. Currently, no director is deferring compensation into stock units.
The compensation expense included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007 was approximately$10,000, $33,000 and $31,000, respectively before the recognized income tax benefit of approximately$4,000, $12,000 in both fiscal years.and $12,000, respectively.
NOTE 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The computation of basic earnings per share (EPS) is based on the number of weighted-averageweighted average common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the incremental shares that would be outstanding assuming exercise of dilutive stock options and issuance of restricted stock. The number of incremental shares is calculated by applying the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | | | | February 3, | | | January 28, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| Net income, in thousands | | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | | | $ | 33,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | | | 31,049,058 | | | | 32,094,127 | | | | 33,605,568 | |
| Stock options | | | 427,822 | | | | 500,478 | | | | 787,458 | |
| Restricted stock | | | 48,170 | | | | 25,234 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive shares | | | 31,525,050 | | | | 32,619,839 | | | | 34,393,026 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 1.19 | | | $ | 1.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings per common share | | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 1.17 | | | $ | 0.98 | |
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | |
| | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income, in thousands | | $ | 29,448 | | | $ | 30,329 | | | $ | 38,073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | | | 28,547,435 | | | | 31,049,058 | | | | 32,094,127 | |
| Dilutive stock options | | | 406,261 | | | | 427,822 | | | | 500,478 | |
| Dilutive restricted stock | | | - | | | | 48,170 | | | | 25,234 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive shares | | | 28,953,696 | | | | 31,525,050 | | | | 32,619,839 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | | $ | 1.03 | | | $ | 0.98 | | | $ | 1.19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 1.02 | | | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 1.17 | |
In calculating diluted earnings per share for the fifty-two weeks ended January 31, 2009, options to purchase 603,330 shares of common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect. In calculating diluted earnings per share for the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008, options to purchase 455,598 shares of common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect. In calculating diluted earnings per share for the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007, options to purchase 135,706 shares of common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect. In calculating diluted earnings per share for the fifty-two weeks ended January 28, 2006, options to purchase 49,000 shares of common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect.
As of February 2, 2008,At January 31, 2009, we had onetwo unsecured credit facility,facilities, which isare renewable annually in August.August and December 2009. The facility allowsfacilities allow for borrowings up to $30.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, at a fixed rate, a rate based on prime or LIBOR plus 0.375%, at our election or another mutually agreed upon fixed rate at the time of draw. As of February 2, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility.election. Under the provisions of this facility,both facilities, we do not pay commitment fees and are not subject to covenant requirements. We can draw down onThere were 348 days during the linefifty-two weeks ended January 31, 2009, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facilities for an average and maximum borrowing of credit when our main operating account balance falls below $100,000.$23.2 million and $47.1 million, respectively, at an average interest rate of 2.85%. At the beginningJanuary 31, 2009, a total of Fiscal$80.0 million was available to us from these facilities.
At February 2, 2008, we had one operating facility allowingthat allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million which we elected to increase to $30.0 million in August 2007.million. There were 106 days during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008, where we incurred borrowings against ourthis credit facility for an average and maximum borrowing of $7.8 million and $18.4 million, respectively, andat an average interest rate of 5.64%. At February 2, 2008, $30.0 million was available to us from this facility.
Subsequent to February 2, 2008, we added a new credit facility that allows borrowings up to $50.0 million. The new facility was effective February 4, 2008 and will expire on December 31, 2008. The facility is unsecured and does not require a commitment or agency fee, nor are there any covenant restrictions.
At February 3, 2007, we had one facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million. There were twenty-four days during the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007, where we incurred borrowings against this credit facility for an average and maximum borrowing of $2.5 million and $5.1 million, respectively, andat an average interest rate of 6.12%. At February 3, 2007, $15.0 million was available to us from this facility.
NOTE 6. PROFIT-SHARING PLANDEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS
We maintain athe Hibbett Sports, Inc. 401(k) profit-sharing plan (thePlan (401(k) Plan) which permits participants to make pre-tax contributions tofor the Plan.benefit of our employees. The 401(k) Plan covers all employees who have completed one year of service and who are at least 21 years of age. Participants of the 401(k) Plan may voluntarily contribute from 1% to 100% of their compensation subject to certain yearly dollar limitations as allowed by law. These elective contributions are made under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code which allows deferral of income taxes on the amount contributed to the 401(k) Plan. The Company’s contribution to the 401(k) Plan equals (1) an amount determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors plus (2) a matching contribution equal to a discretionary percentage of up to 6% of a participant’s compensation. For each of Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, and Fiscal 2006, we matched 75%$0.75 for each dollar of contributions made to the Plancompensation deferred by the employees up to 6%6.0% of compensation. Contribution expense incurred under the employee’s compensation.401(k) Plan for Fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
OnIn November 29, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted the Hibbett Sports, Inc. Supplemental 401(k) Plan (the Supplemental(Supplemental Plan) effective February 1, 2008. The primaryfor the purpose of the Supplemental Plan is to supplementsupplementing the employer matching contribution and salary deferral opportunity available to highly compensated employees whose ability to receive Company matching contributions and defer salary under our existing 401(k) Plan has been limited because of certain restrictions applicable to qualified plans. The non-qualified deferred compensation Supplemental Plan will supplement the existing Plan and allowallows participants to defer up to 40% of their compensation and receive an employer matching contribution equal to $0.75 for each dollar of compensation deferred, subject to a maximum of 4.5% of compensation.compensation and subject to Board discretion. The matching contribution for Fiscal 2008 was2010 has also been set by the Board as $0.75 for each dollar of compensation deferred.
deferred up to 4.5% of compensation. Contribution expense amounts under the PlansSupplemental Plan for Fiscal 2009 was $0.1 million. There was not any contribution expense incurred for the Supplemental Plan for Fiscal 2008 2007 and 2006 were $496,000, $520,000 and $491,000, respectively.or Fiscal 2007.
NOTE 7. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company leases one store under a sublease arrangement from Books-A-Million, Inc., (BAM)(BAMM) of which Clyde B. Anderson, a directorone of the Company,our Directors, Terrance G. Finley is an executive officer Chairmanand stockholder and another Director, Albert C. Johnson, is a Director and stockholder. ThisThe sublease agreement expiresexpired in June 2008.2008, but was renewed under a five-year term to expire in June 2013. Minimum lease payments were $191,000 in Fiscal 2008,2009, Fiscal 20072008 and Fiscal 2006.2007. Future minimum lease payments under this non-cancelable sublease aggregate approximately $80,000. In March 2008, the Board appointed two new directors who are associated with BAM. Albert C. Johnson is a Director and stockholder of BAM and Terrance G. Finley is an executive officer and stockholder of BAM.$0.8 million.
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. For interim financial reporting, we estimate the annual tax rate based on projected taxable income for the full year and record a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the anticipated annual rate. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions.
A summary of the components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | |
| | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| Federal: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | | $ | 18,077 | | | $ | 22,761 | | | $ | 18,800 | | | $ | 17,122 | | | $ | 18,077 | | | $ | 22,761 | |
| Deferred | | | (1,298 | ) | | | (769 | ) | | | (1,518 | ) | | | (827 | ) | | | (1,298 | ) | | | (769 | ) |
| | | | 16,779 | | | | 21,992 | | | | 17,282 | | | | 16,295 | | | | 16,779 | | | | 21,992 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | | 1,577 | | | 2,853 | | | 2,362 | | | | 1,698 | | | | 1,577 | | | | 2,853 | |
| Deferred | | | (27 | ) | | | (304 | ) | | | (400 | ) | | | (88 | ) | | | (27 | ) | | | (304 | ) |
| | | | 1,550 | | | | 2,549 | | | | 1,962 | | | | 1,610 | | | | 1,550 | | | | 2,549 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | $ | 18,329 | | | $ | 24,541 | | | $ | 19,244 | | | $ | 17,905 | | | $ | 18,329 | | | $ | 24,541 | |
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate as a percentage of income tax rate as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes follows:
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended |
| | | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | | January 31, | | February 2, | | February 3, |
| | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2007 |
| Tax provision computed at the federal statutory rate | | | 35.00 | % | | | 35.00 | % | | | 35.00 | % | | | 35.00 | % | | | 35.00 | % | | | 35.00 | % |
| Effect of state income taxes, net of federal benefits | | | 2.36 | % | | | 2.65 | % | | | 2.41 | % | | | 1.99 | | | | 2.36 | | | | 2.65 | |
| Other, net | | | 0.31 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | -1.01 | % | | | 0.82 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 1.54 | |
| | | | 37.67 | % | | | 39.19 | % | | | 36.40 | % | | | 37.81 | % | | | 37.67 | % | | | 39.19 | % |
DeferredIn accordance with SFAS No. 109, deferred income taxes on the consolidated balance sheet result from temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The components of the deferred taxesincome tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):
| | | February 2, 2008 | | February 3, 2007 | | January 31, 2009 | | | February 2, 2008 | |
| | | Current | | Non-current | | Current | | Non-current | | Current | | | Non-current | | | Current | | | Non-current | |
| Deferred rent | | $ | 1,765 | | | $ | 7,257 | | | $ | 1,536 | | | $ | 6,553 | | | $ | 1,782 | | | $ | 6,630 | | | $ | 1,765 | | | $ | 7,257 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | | - | | | (4,994 | ) | | - | | | (3,901 | ) | |
| Inventory | | 1,149 | | | - | | | 285 | | | - | | |
| Prepaids | | (717 | ) | | - | | | - | | | - | | |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | | - | | | | (5,804 | ) | | | - | | | | (4,994 | ) |
| Inventories | | | | 2,209 | | | | - | | | | 1,149 | | | | - | |
| Prepaid expenses | | | | (704 | ) | | | (85 | ) | | | (717 | ) | | | - | |
| Accruals | | 238 | | | 650 | | | 582 | | | 59 | | | | 854 | | | | 737 | | | | 238 | | | | 650 | |
| Stock-based compensation | | 506 | | | 867 | | | 40 | | | 506 | | | | 40 | | | | 2,003 | | | | 506 | | | | 867 | |
| Other | | | (216 | ) | | | - | | | | (836 | ) | | | - | | | | (243 | ) | | | - | | | | (216 | ) | | | - | |
| Deferred taxes | | $ | 2,725 | | | $ | 3,780 | | | $ | 1,607 | | | $ | 3,217 | | |
| Deferred income taxes | | | $ | 3,938 | | | $ | 3,481 | | | $ | 2,725 | | | $ | 3,780 | |
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax assets represent items to be used as a tax deduction or credit in future tax returns for which we have already properly recorded the tax benefit in the income statement.consolidated statements of operations. At least quarterly, we assess the likelihood that the deferred income tax assets balance will be recovered. We take into account such factors as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carryback and carryforward periods and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of a realization of a deferred income tax asset. To the extent recovery is not more likely than not, a valuation allowance is established against the deferred income tax asset, increasing our income tax expense in the year such determination is made. We have determined that no such allowance is required.
Additionally, due toOn February 4, 2007, we adopted the adoptionprovisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN No. 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. As a result of implementing FIN No. 48, (as described in Note 1), we have revised our policy on income taxes with respectincreased the liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $3.8 million, increased deferred tax assets by $3.2 million and reduced retained earnings as of February 4, 2007, by $0.6 million. Our total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of February 4, 2007 amounted to accounting for uncertain tax positions. We consider our policy on income taxes to be a critical accounting policy due to the significant level of estimates, assumptions and judgments and its potential impact on our consolidated financial statements.$5.7 million.
We adopted FIN No. 48 effective February 4, 2007. In accordance with FIN No. 48, we recognize a tax benefit associated with an uncertain tax position when, in our judgment, it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. For a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we initially and subsequently measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that we judge to have a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. Our liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are identified. Our effective tax rate includes the net impact of changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as considered appropriate by management.
A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have recorded a liability related to an unrecognized tax benefit is audited and finally resolved. The number of years with open tax audits varies by jurisdiction. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is adequate. Favorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit could be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in the period of resolution. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is generally presented as non-current. However, if we anticipate paying cash within one year to settle an uncertain tax position, the liability is presented as current.
A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefit under FIN No. 48 during Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2008 follows (in thousands):
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | February 2, 2008 | | January 31, 2009 | | | February 2, 2008 | |
| Unrecognized tax benefit - February 4, 2007 | | $ | 5,117 | | |
| Unrecognized tax benefit - beginning of year | | | $ | 2,623 | | | $ | 5,117 | |
| Gross increases - tax positions in prior period | | 836 | | | | - | | | | 836 | |
| Gross decreases - tax positions in prior period | | (3,259 | ) | | | (100 | ) | | | (3,259 | ) |
| Gross increases - tax positions in current period | | - | | | | 241 | | | | - | |
| Settlements | | (29 | ) | | | - | | | | (29 | ) |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | | | (42 | ) | | | (263 | ) | | | (42 | ) |
| Unrecognized tax benefit - February 2, 2008 | | $ | 2,623 | | |
| Unrecognized tax benefit - end of year | | | $ | 2,501 | | | $ | 2,623 | |
We expect a decrease in our FIN No. 48 liability of approximately $320,000$0.7 million in the next 12 months due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations. We classify interest and penalties recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, we have accrued interest and penalties in the amount of $345,000.$0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
InOf the courseunrecognized tax benefits as of an internal review of prior federalJanuary 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, if recognized, would affect our effective income tax rate.
We file income tax returns we determined that certain deductions may not meet all of the requirements for deductibility with respect to performance-based plans set forth in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We recorded a balance sheet adjustment in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2007, increasingU.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. Generally, we are not subject to changes in income taxes payable and reducing additional paid-in-capital by $1.3 million for deductions taken by the Company inU.S. federal taxing jurisdiction for years prior to Fiscal 2006 andor by most state taxing jurisdictions for years prior years. The related income tax benefit was previously recorded as an increase in additional paid-in-capital and did not impact prior years’ results of operations. No adjustments were required to be made to our consolidated statements of operations. The Fiscal 2007 adjustment is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and was not material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows for any previously reported annual or interim periods.2003.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We lease the premises for our retail sporting goods stores under non-cancelable operating leases having initial or remaining terms of more than one year. The leases typically provide for terms of five to ten years with options onto extend at our part to extend.discretion. Many of our leases contain scheduled increases in annual rent payments and the majority of our leases also require us to pay maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes. Additionally, many of the lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays and/or rent escalation clauses (contingent rentals). For purposes of recognizing incentives and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, we use the date of initial possession to begin amortization, which is generally when we enter the space and begin to make improvements in preparation of our intended use. Contingent rental payments are based on net sales for the location.
We also lease certain computer hardware, office equipment and transportation equipment under non-cancelable operating leases having initial or remaining terms of more than one year.
In February 1996, we entered into a sale-leaseback transaction to finance our distribution center and office facilities. In December 1999, the related operating lease was amended to include the Fiscal 2000 expansion of these facilities. The amended lease rate is $877,000$0.9 million per year and can increase annually with the Consumer Price Index. This lease will expire in December 2014. Future minimum lease payments under this non-cancelable lease aggregate approximately $5.2 million. The transaction is also subject to quarterly financial covenants based on certain ratios. We have never been in violation of any financial covenant requirement.
During the fifty-two weeksfiscal year ended February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we increased our lease commitments by a net of 7557 retail stores, each having initial lease termination dates between January 2012February 2013 and May 20182019 as well as various office and transportation equipment. At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the future minimum lease payments, excluding maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes, for our current operating leases and including the net 7557 operating leases added during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008,Fiscal 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
| Fiscal 2009 | | $ | 40,332 | | |
| Fiscal 2010 | | 35,676 | | | $ | 42,496 | |
| Fiscal 2011 | | 28,735 | | | | 36,621 | |
| Fiscal 2012 | | 22,635 | | | | 30,183 | |
| Fiscal 2013 | | 17,519 | | | | 24,209 | |
| Fiscal 2014 | | | | 17,195 | |
| Thereafter | | | 32,280 | | | | 27,457 | |
| TOTAL | | $ | 177,177 | | | $ | 178,161 | |
Rental expense for all operating leases consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | Fiscal Year Ended | | | Fiscal Year Ended | |
| | | February 2, | | February 3, | | January 28, | | | January 31, | | | February 2, | | | February 3, | |
| | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| Minimum rentals | | $ | 32,693 | | $ | 30,291 | | $ | 27,774 | | | $ | 34,283 | | | $ | 32,693 | | | $ | 30,291 | |
| Contingent rentals | | | 2,342 | | | 2,339 | | | 1,658 | | | | 2,689 | | | | 2,342 | | | | 2,339 | |
| | | $ | 35,035 | | $ | 32,630 | | $ | 29,432 | | | $ | 36,972 | | | $ | 35,035 | | | $ | 32,630 | |
Most of our retail store leases contain provisions that allow for early termination of the lease by either party if certain pre-determined annual sales levels are not met. Generally, these provisions allow the lease to be terminated between the third and fifth year of the lease. Should the lease be terminated under these provisions, in some cases, the unamortized portion of any landlord allowances related to that property would be payable to the landlord.
Annual Bonuses and Equity Incentive Awards
Specified officers and corporate employees of our Company are entitled to annual bonuses, primarily based on measures of Company operating performance. At January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, there was $2.9 million, $0.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of annual bonus related expense included in accrued expenses.
In addition, starting in March 2006, the Compensation Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors of the Company began placing performance criteria on awards of RSUs (PSAs) to our NEOs under the Incentive Plan. The performance criteria are tied to performance targets with respect to future sales and operating income over a specified period of time. These PSAs are expensed under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and are evaluated each quarter to determine the probability that the performance conditions set within will be met. We expect the Committee to continue to place performance criteria on awards of RSUs to our NEOs in the future.
Legal Proceedings and other Contingencies
In October 2005, three former employees filed a lawsuit in Mississippi federal court alleging they are owed back wages for overtime because they were improperly classified as exempt salaried employees. They also allege other wage and hour violations. The suit asked the court to certify the case as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of all similarly situated employees. We dispute the allegations of wrongdoing in this complaint and have vigorously defended ourselves in this matter. However, the parties have negotiated a settlement and the court has now ruled to certify the collective action in accordance with the negotiated settlement. At February 2, 2008, we began making initial distributions and estimated that the remaining liability related to this matter is $755,000. Accordingly, we accrued $755,000 as a current liability on our consolidated balance sheet. At February 3, 2007, we estimated that the liability related to this matter was within the range of $750,000 and $960,000 and accordingly, accrued $750,000 as a current liability on our consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2008, we completed our obligation under the negotiated settlement related to this case.
We are alsoa party to othervarious legal proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that any of these matters will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. We cannot give assurance, however, that one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period in which they are resolved. At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, we have estimatedestimate that the liability related to these other matters is approximately $20,000$47,000 and accordingly, have accrued $20,000$47,000 as a current liability on our consolidated balance sheet. As of February 3, 2007, no loss2, 2008, we had accrued $0.8 million as it related to our estimated liability for legal proceedings which primarily consisted of an amount was accrued becausefor a loss was not considered probable or estimable.pending lawsuit that has since been settled.
The estimates of our liability for pending and unasserted potential claims doesdo not include litigation costs. It is our policy to accrue legal fees when it is probable that we will have to defend against known claims or allegations and we can reasonably estimate the amount of the anticipated expense. Although we have accrued legal fees associated with litigation currently pending against us, we have not made any accruals for potential liability for settlements or judgments because the potential liability is neither probable nor estimable.
From time to time, we enter into certain types of agreements that require us to indemnify parties against third party claims under certain circumstances. Generally, these agreements relate to: (a) agreements with vendors and suppliers under which we may provide customary indemnification to our vendors and suppliers in respect ofto actions they take at our request or otherwise on our behalf; (b) agreements to indemnify vendors against trademark and copyright infringement claims concerning merchandise manufactured specifically for or on behalf of the Company; (c) real estate leases, under which we may agree to indemnify the lessors from claims arising from our use of the property; and (d) agreements with our directors, officers and employees, under which we may agree to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their relationship with us. The Company hasWe have director and officer liability insurance, which, subject to the policy’s conditions, provides coverage for indemnification amounts payable by us with respect to our directors and officers up to specified limits and subject to certain deductibles.
If the Company believes that a loss is both probable and estimable for a particular matter, the loss is accrued in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. With respect to any matter, the Company could change its belief as to whether a loss is probable or estimable, or its estimate of loss, at any time. Even though the Company may not believe a loss is probable or estimable, it is reasonably possible that the Company could suffer a loss with respect to that matter in the future.
NOTE 10. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables set forth certain unaudited consolidated financial data for the thirteen-week quarters indicated (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
| | | Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2008 | |
| | | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | |
| | | (13 weeks) | | (13 weeks) | | (13 weeks) | | (13 weeks) | |
| Net sales | | $ | 133,842 | | $ | 114,404 | | $ | 129,628 | | $ | 142,847 | |
| Gross profit | | | 45,053 | | | 37,476 | | | 42,474 | | | 43,841 | |
| Operating income | | | 16,102 | | | 7,797 | | | 12,553 | | | 11,775 | |
| Net income | | | 10,227 | | | 4,681 | | | 7,815 | | | 7,606 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.26 | |
| Diluted earnings per common share | | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.25 | |
| | | Fiscal Year Ended February 3, 2007 | | |
| | | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2009 | |
| | | (13 weeks) | | (13 weeks) | | (13 weeks) | | (14 weeks) | | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | |
| Net sales | | $ | 126,914 | | $ | 104,363 | | $ | 129,658 | | $ | 151,159 | | $ | 145,825 | | $ | 130,289 | | $ | 140,148 | | $ | 147,926 | |
| Gross profit | | 44,140 | | | 32,692 | | | 43,066 | | | 53,233 | | | 47,812 | | | 42,266 | | | 46,692 | | | 48,601 | |
| Operating income | | 18,125 | | | 6,425 | | | 15,612 | | | 21,576 | | | 15,434 | | | 7,811 | | | 12,032 | | | 12,695 | |
| Net income | | 11,523 | | | 4,020 | | | 9,926 | | | 12,604 | | | 9,372 | | | 4,792 | | | 7,652 | | | 7,633 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 0.35 | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | 0.31 | | $ | 0.40 | | |
| Diluted earnings per common share | | $ | 0.35 | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | 0.31 | | $ | 0.39 | | |
| Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | 0.17 | | $ | 0.27 | | $ | 0.27 | |
| Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 0.17 | | $ | 0.26 | | $ | 0.26 | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2008 | |
| | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | |
| Net sales | $ | 133,842 | | $ | 114,404 | | $ | 129,628 | | $ | 142,847 | |
| Gross profit | | 45,053 | | | 37,476 | | | 42,474 | | | 43,841 | |
| Operating income | | 16,102 | | | 7,797 | | | 12,553 | | | 11,775 | |
| Net income | | 10,227 | | | 4,681 | | | 7,815 | | | 7,606 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.26 | |
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.25 | |
In the opinion of our management, this unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited information presented elsewhere herein and includes all adjustments necessary to present fairly the information set forth herein. The operating results from any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
The Fiscal 2008 unaudited consolidated statementsstatement of operations for the second quarter presented above includes a $1.2 million pretax benefit related to our accounting for inventory in-transit and shrinkage results. The total pretax benefit of $1.2 million was corrected in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008. We have reviewed thisthe accounting error utilizing SAB No. 99, “Materiality”Materiality and SAB No. 108, “Effects of Prior Year Misstatements on Current Year Financial Statements,” and believedetermined the impact of thisthe error is not material to current or prior interimbe immaterial to any period consolidated financial statements.
ON SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hibbett Sports, Inc.:
We have audited and reported separately herein on the financial statements of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
April 1, 2008
HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| | | Balance at Beginning of Period | | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | | Write-offs, net of recoveries | | | Balance at End of Period | |
| Fiscal 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 59,000 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | (34,000 | ) | | $ | 45,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2007 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 45,000 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | (31,000 | ) | | $ | 34,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 34,000 | | | $ | 27,000 | | | $ | (15,000 | ) | | $ | 46,000 | |
Not applicable.
(a) Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, based on the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”)(COSO). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.
KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009 included in Item 8 herein.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 20082009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code) for all Company employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Controller. The Code is posted on our website, www.hibbett.com under “Investor Information.” We intend to make all required disclosures regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code for Senior Executive and Financial Officers by posting such information on our website.
The information appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Proxy Statement) to be held on May 28, 2009, relating to the members of the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert under the caption “Board and Committees of the Board” as well as the information appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” is hereby incorporated by reference.
The balance of the information required in this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Directors and Executive Officers”, “The Board of Directors”, “Code of Ethics”, “Annual Compensation of Executive Officers” and “Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 2, 2008 (the “Proxy Statement”), which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Statement.
The information required in this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Annual Compensation of Executive Officers”, “Compensation Committee Report” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement.
The information required in this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled "Security“Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners”, “Compensation of Non-Employee Directors”, “Annual Compensation of Executive Officers” and “Directors and Executive Officers” in the Proxy Statement.
Equity Compensation Plan Information (1)
| | | (a) | | | (b) | | | (c) | |
| Plan Category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (2) | | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options | | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | 1,572,086 | | | $ | 16.46 | | | | 1,630,797 | |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| TOTAL | | | 1,572,086 | | | $ | 16.46 | | | | 1,630,797 | |
| (1) | Information presented as of January 31, 2009. |
| (2) | Includes 238,918 RSUs and 73,000 PSAs that may be awarded if specified targets and/or service periods are met. The weighted average exercise price of outstanding options does not include these awards. |
| (3) | Includes 134,265 shares remaining under our ESPP and 83,185 shares remaining under our DEP of which approximately 3,000 shares were subject to purchase in the purchasing period ending March 31, 2009. |
The information required in this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Related Person Transactions” and “Governance Information” in the Proxy Statement.
The information required in this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Proposal Number 2 – Ratification of the Appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.
| (a) | Documents filed as part of this report: |
| | | | |
| | 1. | Financial Statements. | Page |
| | | | |
| | | The following Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Registrant and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report on such Financial Statements are incorporated by reference from the Company’s 20082009 Annual Report to Stockholders, in Part II, Item 8: | |
| | | | |
| | | | 29 |
| | | | 30 |
| | | | 31 |
| | | | 32 |
| | | | 33 |
| | | | 34 |
| | | | |
| | 2. | Financial Statement Schedules. | |
| | | | |
| | | The index to the Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule follows: | |
| | | |
| | | 49 |
| | | 50 |
| | | |
| | All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable, and therefore have been omitted. | |
| | | | |
| | 3. | Exhibits. | |
| | | | |
| | | The Exhibits listed below are the exhibits of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report. | |
| | | | |
| Number | Description | |
| | | | |
| | | Certificates of Incorporation and By-Laws | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2007.) | |
| 3.2 | By-laws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2007.) | |
| | | | |
| | | Material Contracts | |
| 10.1 | Adoption by BoardCredit Agreement between the Company and Bank of Directors of Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. of an amendment to the 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan to change the date of the director’s annual equity award to coincide with the employee annual equity award grant date,America, N.A., dated as of February 2, 2007;4, 2008; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2007.5, 2008. | |
| 10.2 | Sub-Sub-Sublease Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization that created the successor holding company Hibbett Sports, Inc. tobetween Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. and its subsidiaries,Books-A-Million, dated as of February 9, 2007;April 23, 1996; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2006. | |
| 10.3 | Hibbett Sports, Inc. equity plan amendments approved by the Board of Directors, dated June 2, 2008; incorporated by reference as Exhibits 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2007.June 6, 2008. | |
10.310.4 | Credit Agreement between the Company and Regions Bank, datedeffective August 28, 2008; incorporated as of August 29, 2007; incorporated by reference as Exhibitexhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29, 2007. | |
10.4 | Adoption by Board of Directors of Hibbett Sports, Inc. of the Supplemental 401(k) Plan to allow highly compensated employees participation in salary deferral; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007.21, 2008. | |
| 10.5 | 10.5 | Hiring and compensation arrangements for Nissan Joseph as President and Chief Operating Officer of Hibbett Sports, Inc.; incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 2008. | | 10.5 | Credit Agreement between the Company and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 20, 2008; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2008. | |
| 10.6 | 10.6 | Adoption by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hibbett Sports, Inc. of a Change in Control Severance Agreement for specified executives of the Company; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2008. | | 10.6 | Hibbett Sports, Inc. equity plan amendments approved by the Board of Directors, dated November 20, 2008; incorporated by reference as Exhibits 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2008. | |
| 10.7 | | 10.7 | Hibbett Sports, Inc. Executive Officer Cash Bonus Plan amendment approved by the Board of Directors, dated November 20, 2008; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2008. | |
| 10.8 | | 10.8 | Hibbett Sports, Inc. Executive Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on March 11, 2009 (filed herewith). | 54 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Annual Report to Security Holders | | | Annual Report to Security Holders | |
| 13.1 | 13.1 | Fiscal 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders. | | 13.1 | Fiscal 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders. | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | |
| 21 | 21 | List of Company’s Subsidiaries: 1) Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. 2) Hibbett Team Sales, Inc. 3) Sports Wholesale, Inc. 4) Hibbett Capital Management, Inc. 5) Sports Holding, Inc. 6) Gift Card Services, LLC | | 21 | List of Company’s Subsidiaries: 1)Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. 2)Hibbett Team Sales, Inc. 3)Sports Wholesale, Inc. 4)Hibbett Capital Management, Inc. 5)Sports Holding, Inc. | |
| | | | | | 6)Gift Card Services, LLC 7)Hibbett.com, Inc. | |
| | | Consents of Experts and Counsel | | | | |
| | | | Consents of Experts and Counsel | |
| 23.1 | 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith) | 56 | 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith) | 58 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Certifications | | | Certifications | |
| 31.1 | 31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith) | 57 | 31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith) | 59 |
| 31.2 | 31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith) | 58 | 31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith) | 60 |
| 32.1 | 32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith) | 59 | 32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith) | 61 |
| 32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith) | 60 | |
| | | | | | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | HIBBETT SPORTS, INC. |
| | | |
Date: April 2, 2008March 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ Gary A. Smith |
| | | Gary A. Smith Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date |
| | | |
| /s/ Michael J. Newsome | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) | April 2, 2008March 31, 2009 |
Michael J. Newsome | |
| | |
| | | |
| /s/ Gary A. Smith | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | March 31, 2009 |
Gary A. Smith | |
| | | |
| | |
/s/ Clyde B. Anderson | Director | |
Clyde B. Anderson
| | |
| | |
| | |
| /s/ Terrance G. Finley | Director | March 31, 2009 |
| Terrance G. Finley | | |
| | |
| | | |
| /s/ Albert C. Johnson | Director | March 31, 2009 |
| Albert C. Johnson | | |
| | |
| | | |
| /s/ Carl Kirkland | Director | March 31, 2009 |
Carl Kirkland | | |
| | |
| | | |
| /s/ Ralph T. Parks | Director | March 31, 2009 |
Ralph T. Parks | | |
| | |
| | | |
| /s/ Thomas A. Saunders, III | Director | March 31, 2009 |
Thomas A. Saunders, III | | |
| | | |
| | |
| /s/ Alton E. Yother | Lead Director | March 31, 2009 |
Alton E. Yother | | |
| | |
5553
