Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the transition period            to            

Commission File Number 001-32505

TRANSMONTAIGNE PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Suite 3100, 1670 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80202
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(303) 626-8200
(Telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

        Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

        Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ý No / /o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. /X/ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, (as definedor a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes / /    No /X/Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated Filer o            Accelerated Filer ý            Non-accelerated Filer o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes / /o No /X/ý

        The aggregate market value of common limited partner units held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $98,754,768.$120,601,600.

        The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the last sale price ($26.0132.00 per common unit) of the Registrant's common limited partner units on the New York Stock Exchange on August 29, 2005.March 2, 2007.

        The number of the registrant's common limited partner units outstanding on August 29, 2005March 2, 2007 was 3,972,500.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to such reports, will be available free of charge on our website atwww.transmontaignepartners.com under the heading "Unit holder"Unitholder Information" "SEC Filings" as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the following:

–>•

certain statements, including possible or assumed future results of operations, in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;"



–>•

any statements contained herein or thereinin this annual report regarding the prospects for our business or any of our services;services or our ability to pay distributions;



–>•

any statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words "may," "seeks," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "continues," "estimates," "plans," "targets," "predicts," "attempts," "is scheduled," or similar expressions; and



–>•

other statements contained herein or thereinin this annual report regarding matters that are not historical facts.

Our business and results of operations are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our ability to control or predict. Because of these risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements, and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date thereof.

In addition to the specific risk        Important factors, many of which are described in more detail in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—1A. Risk Factors," important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to:

–>•

a reduction in revenues from TransMontaigne Inc.,any of our significant customers upon which we rely for a substantial majority of our revenues;



–>

the continued creditworthiness of, and performance by, contract parties, including TransMontaigne Inc.;



–>

a reduction or suspension of TransMontaigne Inc.'s obligations under the terminaling services agreement;



–>

TransMontaigne Inc.'s failure to continue to engage us to provide services after the expiration of the terminaling services agreement, or our failure to secure comparable alternative arrangements;



–>

the availability of acquisition opportunities and successful integration and future performance of acquired assets;



–>

the failure to purchase additional refined product terminals from TransMontaigne Inc.;



–>

timing, cost and other economic uncertainties related to the construction of new assets;



–>•

debt levels and restrictions in our debt agreements that may limit our operational flexibility;



–>•

the threatimpact on our facilities or operations of extreme weather conditions, such as hurricanes, and other events, such as terrorist attacks or war;war and costs associated with environmental compliance and remediation;



–>•

failure by any of our significant customers to continue to engage us to provide services after the expiration of existing terminaling services agreements, or our failure to secure comparable alternative arrangements;



•

the impactcontinued creditworthiness of, currentand performance by our significant customers;



•

the availability of acquisition opportunities and successful integration and future laws and governmental regulations;performance of acquired facilities;



–>•

liability for environmental claims;timing, cost and other economic uncertainties related to the construction of new tank capacity or facilities;



–>•

conflicts of interest and the limited fiduciary duties of our general partner, which is controlled by TransMontaigne Inc.;



–>•

our failure to avoid federal income taxation as a corporation or the imposition of state level taxation; and



–>•

the impact of current and future laws and governmental regulations, general economic, market or business conditions;

We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements except as required by law.

3

Part I

ITEMS 1 AND 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

OVERVIEW

TransMontaigne Partners L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership formed in February 2005 by TransMontaigne Inc., but did not commence We commenced operations untilupon the closing of our initial public offering on May 27, 2005. Effective December 31, 2005, we changed our year end for financial and tax reporting purposes from June 30 to December 31. Our common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "TLP." Our principal executive offices are located at 1670 Broadway, Denver, Colorado 80202; our telephone number is (303) 672-8200. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to "we," "us," "our," "TransMontaigne Partners," "Partners" or the "partnership" are intended to mean TransMontaigne Partners L.P., our subsidiarywholly-owned and controlled operating limited partnerships and their subsidiaries. References to TransMontaigne Inc. are intended to mean TransMontaigne Inc. and its subsidiaries other than TransMontaigne GP L.L.C., our general partner, TransMontaigne Partners and subsidiaries of TransMontaigne Partners.

We are a refined petroleum products terminaling and pipelinetransportation company with operations currentlyalong the Gulf Coast, in Florida, Southwest MissouriBrownsville, Texas, along the Mississippi and Northwest Arkansas.Ohio rivers and in the Midwest. We provide integrated terminaling, storage, pipelinetransportation and related services for companies engaged in the distribution and marketing of refined petroleum products and crude oil, including TransMontaigne Inc. We handle light refined products, such asheavy refined products, crude oil, chemicals and fertilizers. Light refined products include gasolines, distillates (including heating oil) and jet fuels, and heavy refined products such asinclude residual fuel oils and asphalt, and crude oil.

Our existing assets, often referred to as the "contributed assets," include:

–>

seven refined product terminals located in Florida, with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 5.8 million barrels, that provide integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc., other distribution and marketing companies and the United States government;

–>

a 67-mile, interstate refined products pipeline, which we refer to as the Razorback Pipeline, that currently transports gasolines and distillates for TransMontaigne Inc. from Mt. Vernon, Missouri to Rogers, Arkansas; and

–>

two refined product terminals, one located in Mt. Vernon, Missouri and the other located in Rogers, Arkansas, with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 400,000 barrels, that are connected to the Razorback Pipeline and provide integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc.

asphalt. We do not purchase or market products that we handle or transport and, therefore,transport. Therefore, we do not have material direct exposure to changes in commodity prices, except for the value of product gains and losses arising from our terminaling services agreements with our customers.

        We are controlled by our general partner, TransMontaigne GP L.L.C., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc. Effective September 1, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., which we refer to as Morgan Stanley Capital Group, acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TransMontaigne Inc. As a result, Morgan Stanley, which is the parent company of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, became the indirect owner of 100% of our general partner. The following diagram depicts our current organization and structure.

        TransMontaigne Inc., formed in 1995, is a terminaling, distribution and marketing company that markets refined petroleum products to wholesalers, distributors, marketers and industrial and commercial end users throughout the United States, primarily in the Gulf Coast, East Coast and Midwest regions. TransMontaigne Inc. also provides supply chain management services to various customers throughout the United States. TransMontaigne Inc. relies on us to provide substantially all of the integrated terminaling services it requires to support its operations along the Gulf Coast, in Brownsville, Texas, along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers, and in the Midwest.

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group is the principal commodities trading arm of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley Capital Group is a leading global commodity trader involved in proprietary and counterparty-driven trading in numerous commodities markets including crude oil, refined petroleum products, natural gas and natural gas liquids, coal, electric power, base and precious metals and others. Morgan Stanley Capital Group engages in trading both physical commodities, like refined petroleum products that we handle in our terminals, and exchange or over-the-counter commodities derivative instruments. Morgan Stanley Capital Group has also made acquisitions, including the acquisition of TransMontaigne Inc., that complement Morgan Stanley's commodity trading activities.

        Our existing facilities are located in four geographic regions, which we refer to as our Gulf Coast, Brownsville, River and Midwest facilities.

•

Gulf Coast. Our Gulf Coast facilities consist of eight refined product terminals, seven of which are located in Florida and one of which is located in Mobile, Alabama, with approximately 5.8 million barrels of aggregate active storage capacity.



•

Brownsville. Our Brownsville terminal complex in Brownsville, Texas, has approximately 2.2 million barrels of aggregate active storage capacity. This includes a liquefied petroleum gas terminaling facility with aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 15,000 barrels. We operate a bi-directional refined products pipeline for PMI Trading Limited, or PMI, for deliveries to and from Mexico.



•

River. Our River facilities are comprised of 12 refined product terminals located along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers with approximately 2.7 million barrels of aggregate active storage capacity. Our River facilities also include a dock facility in Baton Rouge, Louisiana that is interconnected to the Colonial Pipeline.



•

Midwest. Our Midwest facilities consist of a 67-mile, interstate refined products pipeline, which we refer to as the Razorback Pipeline; and three refined product terminals with approximately 561,000 barrels of aggregate active storage capacity.

RECENT EVENTSACQUISITIONS

We were formed by        On December 29, 2006, we acquired the River and Brownsville facilities from TransMontaigne Inc. to ownfor an aggregate purchase price of $135 million. We financed the acquisition of the River and operate certainBrownsville facilities through additional borrowings under our amended and restated senior secured credit agreement. The acquisition was approved by the conflicts committee of itsthe board of directors of our general partner.

        On January 1, 2006, we acquired a refined product terminal and pipeline assets. In connection with our initial public offering the following transactions occurred:

–>

in Mobile, Alabama from TransMontaigne Inc. transferred the contributed assets to us in exchange for (1) the issuance to TransMontaigne Inc. and its affiliates of 120,000 common units, 2,872,266 subordinated units, a 2% general partner interest, represented by 148,873 general partner units and related incentive distribution rights and (2) the payment of $111.5 million in cash;

4approximately $17.9 million.

–>

we issued 3,852,500 common units (including the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option) to the public at the initial offering price of $21.40 per common unit and issued 450,000 subordinated units to an affiliate of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. in a separate private placement at a price of $17.65 per unit;

–>

we borrowed $31.5 million under a new credit facility and paid $0.9 million of deferred debt issuance costs incurred in connection with our new credit facility; and

–>

we entered into a terminaling services agreement and an omnibus agreement with TransMontaigne Inc..

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

Refined product terminaling and pipeline transportation companies, such as TransMontaigne Partners, facilitate the movement of refined products to consumers around the country. Consumption of refined products in the United States exceeds domestic production, which necessitates the importing

of refined products from other countries. Moreover, a substantial majority of the petroleum product refining that occurs in the United States is concentrated in the Gulf Coast region, which necessitates the transportation of domestic productionproduct to other areas, such as the East Coast, Florida, Midwest and West Coast regions of the country. Terminaling and pipeline transportation companies receive, store, blend, treat and distribute refined products, both domestic and imported, as they are transported from refineries to retailers and end-users.

Refining.    Refineries in the Gulf Coast region refine crude oil into various "light oils" and "heavy oils." Light oils include gasolines and distillates, such as diesel fuels, heating oils and jet fuels. Heavy oils include residual fuel oils and asphalt. These products have various characteristics, such as sulfur content, octane level, Reid-vapor pressure and other chemical characteristics. Refined petroleum products of a specific grade and characteristics are substantially identical in composition from one refinery to another and are referred to as being "fungible." The refined products initially are stored at the refineries' own terminal facilities. The refineries owned by major oil companies then schedule for delivery some of their product output to satisfy their own retail delivery obligations, at branded gasoline stations, for example, and sell the remainder of their product output to independent marketing and distribution companies or traders, such as TransMontaigne Inc. and its independent supply partners,Morgan Stanley Capital Group, for resale. The major refineries typically prefer to sell their excess product to independent marketing and distribution companies rather than to other refineries and integrated oil companies, which are their primary competitors.

Transportation.    For an independent distribution and marketing company, such as TransMontaigne Inc., to distribute product in the wholesale markets, it must first schedule that product for shipment by tankers or barges or on common carrier pipelines to a terminal.

Product reaches Florida primarily through marine terminals, as there are no interstate pipelines transporting refined products into the state.        Product is transported to marine terminals, such as our Gulf Coast terminals and Baton Rouge, Louisiana dock facility, by tankers or barges. Because there are economies of scale in transporting products by vessel, marine terminals with larger storage capacities for various commodities have the ability to offer their customers lower per-barrel freight costs to a greater extent than do terminals with smaller storage capacities.

Product reaches inland terminals, such as our Mt. Vernon, Rogers and RogersOklahoma City terminals, by common carrier pipelines. Common carrier pipelines are pipelines with published tariffs that are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, or state authorities. These pipelines ship product in batches, with each batch generally consisting of fungible product owned by several different companies. As a batch of product is shipped on a pipeline,

5

each terminal operator along the way draws the volume of fungible product that is scheduled for that facility as the batch passes in the pipeline. Consequently, each terminal operator must monitor the type of product in the common carrier pipeline to determine when to draw product scheduled for delivery to that terminal. In addition, both the common carrier pipeline and the terminal operator monitor the volume of product drawn to ensure that the amount scheduled for delivery at that location is actually received.

At both inland and marine terminals, the various refined petroleum products are segregated and stored in tanks. Because the characteristics of gasoline are required to be changed at least twice per year in many locations to meet government regulations, regular unleaded gasoline produced for winter cannot be stored in a tank together with regular unleaded gasoline produced for summer.

Delivery.    Most terminals have a tanker truck loading facility commonly referred to as a "rack." Often, commercial and industrial end-users and independent retailers will rely on independent trucking companies to pick up product at the rack and transport it to the end-user or retailer at its location. Each truck holds an aggregate of approximately 8,000 gallons (approximately 190 barrels) of various products in different compartments. The driver will swipeswipes a magnetic card that identifies the customer purchasing the product, the carrier and the driver as well as the products to be pumped into the truck.

A computerized system electronically reviews the credentials of the carrier, including insurance and certain mandated certifications, the credit of the customer and confirms the customer is within product allocation limits. When all conditions are verified as being current and correct, the system authorizes the delivery of the product to the truck. As product is being loaded into the truck, additives are injected into products, including all gasolines, to conform to government specifications and individual customer requirements. If a truck is loading gasoline for retail sale by an independent gasoline station, generic additives will be added to the gasoline as it is loaded into the truck. If the gasoline is for delivery to a branded retail gasoline station, the proprietary additive compound of that particular retailer will be added to the gasoline as it is loaded. The type and amount of additive are electronically and mechanically controlled by equipment located at the truck loading rack. Approximately one to two gallons of additive are added toinjected into an 8,000 gallon truckload of gasoline.

At marine terminals, the product will be stored in tanks and may be delivered to tanker trucks over a rack in the same manner as at an inland terminal. Product also may be delivered to cruise ships and other vessels, known as bunkering, either at the dock, through a pipeline or truck, or by barge. Cruise ships typically purchase approximately 6,000 to 8,000 barrels, the equivalent of approximately 42 tanker truckloads, of product per refueling. Bunker fuel is a mixture of residual fuel oil and distillate. Each large vessel generally requires its own mixture of bunker fuel to match the distinct characteristics of that ship's engines and turbines. Because the mixture for each ship requires precision to mix and deliver, cruise ships often prefer to refuel in United States ports with experienced companies.

OUR OPERATIONS

Our existing assetsterminal facilities are located in Florida, Southwest Missourithe United States along the Gulf Coast, in Brownsville, Texas, along the Mississippi and Northwest Arkansas.Ohio rivers and in the Midwest. We use our terminaling assetsfacilities to, among other things:

–>•

receive refined products from the pipeline, ship, barge or railcar making delivery on behalf of our customers, and transfer those products to the tanks located at our terminals;



–>•

store the refined products in our tanks for our customers;



–>•

monitor the volume of the refined products stored in our tanks;



6

---

–>•

distribute the refined products out of our terminals in small lots or truckloads via the truck racks and other distribution equipment located at our terminals; andterminals, including pipelines;



–>•

heat residual fuel oils and asphalt stored in our tanks, and provide other ancillary services related to the throughput process.process; and



•

operate and manage for PMI a 17-mile bi-directional refined products pipeline that connects our Brownsville terminal complex to a terminal facility located in Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico.

We derive revenues from our refined product terminals by charging fees for providing the following integrated terminaling and related services: throughput and additive injection fees based on the volume of product distributed at a standardcontracted rate per barrel, terminaling storage fees based on a per barrel of storage capacity per month, and ancillary services including heating and mixing of stored products, product transfer services, and product gains and losses arising from the terminaling services agreements with our customers. We generate revenues at the Razorback Pipeline by charging a tariff regulated by the FERC, based on the volume of product transported and the distance from the origin point to the delivery point. We also generate management fees associated with the bi-directional refined products pipeline that we manage and operate for PMI on a cost-plus basis.

        TransMontaigne Inc. and Marathon Petroleum Company LLC, which we refer to as Marathon, are the principal customers at our Florida and Midwest facilities, TransMontaigne Inc. is our principal customer at our Midwest facilities and our principal customers at our Brownsville and River facilities

include: Valero Energy Corporation and its affiliates, which we refer to as Valero, Morgan Stanley Capital Group and PMI. Financial information for each reportable segment is included in Note 15 of the Notes to consolidated financial Statements in Item 8 of this annual report.

        The locations and approximate aggregate active storage capacity at our terminal facilities as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:

(1)

Reflects our ownership interest net of CITGO Petroleum Corporation's ownership interest in certain tank capacity.

        Brownsville Operations.    At our Brownsville terminal facilities, we handle a large volume of liquid product movements between Mexico and south Texas including refined petroleum products, chemicals, vegetable oils, naphtha, wax and propane on behalf of, and provide integrated terminaling services to, third parties engaged in the distribution and marketing of refined products and natural gas liquids. Our Brownsville facilities receive refined products on behalf of our customers from waterborne vessels, by truck or railcar. We also receive natural gas liquids by pipeline.

        We also operate and maintain a 17-mile bi-directional refined products pipeline owned by PMI. The pipeline connects our Brownsville terminal complex to a terminal facility located in Matamoros, Tamuligas, Mexico, approximately seven miles from the United States-Mexico border. The pipeline can accommodate natural gas liquids and refined petroleum products. We operate and manage the pipeline for PMI on a "cost-plus" basis under which we are reimbursed for our expenses and earn a fee equal to a fixed percentage of the costs we incur.

        The customers we serve at our Brownsville terminal complex consist principally of wholesale and retail marketers of refined products and industrial and commercial end-users of refined petroleum products, waxes and industrial chemicals. Our principal customers are Morgan Stanley Capital Group and PMI.

Florida Operations        Gulf Coast Operations.

Our Florida assetsGulf Coast operations include seveneight refined product terminals. At our FloridaGulf Coast terminals, we handle refined products and crude oil on behalf of, and provide integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc., other companies engaged in the distribution and marketing of refined products and crude oil, and the United States government. All of our FloridaOur Gulf Coast terminals receive refined products from waterborne vessels on behalf of our customers. In addition, our Jacksonville terminal also receives asphalt by rail and our Port Everglades (North) terminal receives product by rail and truck as well as barge. We distribute by truck or barge at all of our Gulf Coast terminals. In addition, we distribute refined products by pipeline at our Port Everglades and Tampa terminals and by rail at our Port Everglades (North) and Jacksonville terminals. Our Port Everglades (South) terminal is connected by pipeline to our Port Everglades (North) terminal. CITGO Petroleum Corporation retains an ownership interest, ranging from 25% to 50%, in specific tank capacity at our Port Everglades (South) terminal. We operate the Port Everglades (South) terminal, and we are reimbursed by CITGO for a share of our expenses. Our Mobile, Alabama terminal facility receives and distributes refined product by truck and barge.

        The principal customers at our Gulf Coast facilities are TransMontaigne Inc. and Marathon. The customers TransMontaigne Inc. serves from our FloridaGulf Coast terminals consist principally of wholesale and retail marketers of refined products, cruise ships, an electric utility and industrial and commercial end-users. The principal products that we handle at our FloridaGulf Coast terminals are light refined products, (such as gasolines), distillates (including heating oils), and jet fuels, heavy refined products such as residual fuel oils and asphalt, and crude oil.

The following chart sets forth information about our existing assets in Florida:

(1)

Reflects our ownership interest net of CITGO Petroleum Corporation's ownership interest.

7

(2)

The Jacksonville terminal also has six idle tanks with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 110,000 barrels, which were idle when purchased in February 2003.

(3)

The Port Manatee terminal also has seven idle tanks with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 380,000 barrels, which were idle when purchased in February 2003.

(4)

The Tampa terminal also has one idle tank with an aggregate storage capacity of 80,000 barrels.

The following map shows our Florida operations:

Port Everglades Terminals.        River Operations.    Our Port EvergladesRiver facilities include twelve refined product terminals are located near Fort Lauderdale,along the Mississippi and includeOhio rivers and the Baton Rouge, Louisiana dock facility. At our Port Everglades (North) terminalRiver terminals, we handle refined products, including gasolines and our Port Everglades (South) terminal.

Port Everglades (North) Terminal.    Our Port Everglades (North), Florida marine terminal is connected by pipelinedistillates, and fertilizer on behalf of, and provide integrated terminaling services to four ship berths for receivingcompanies engaged in the distribution and marketing of refined products and is equipped with three truck racks, one for residual fuel oil, one for lightindustrial and commercial end-users. Our River terminals receive refined products and one for asphalt. The terminal receives gasolines, distillates, jet fuels, residual fuel oils and asphalt from ships and bargeswaterborne vessels on behalf of our customers for delivery via (a) ourcustomers. We distribute products primarily by truck racks to our customers for redistribution to locations throughout south Florida, including Miami, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach; (b) barges to our customers for redistribution to bunker fuel and residual oil customers and gasoline, distillate and jet fuel customers, primarily in the Bahamas; (c) TransMontaigne Inc.'s proprietary pipeline delivery

8

system for delivery of bunker fuels to cruise ships and other vessels in Port Everglades; and (d) the Buckeye Pipeline for jet fuel delivery to the Fort Lauderdale and Miami Airports. The terminal also receives crude oil through a separate truck rack for delivery to ships or barges, and has facilities for the receipt and delivery of refined products to and from railcars. The Port Everglades (North) terminal has room for an additional 1.0 million barrels of storage capacity.waterborne vessels. Our customers include a marketer of asphalt, the United States Government, major oil companies and TransMontaigne Inc. TransMontaigne Inc. markets gasolines, distillates and residual fuel oils from the terminal to wholesale and retail marketers of refined products, cruise ships, shipping companies and the utility industry.

Port Everglades (South) Terminal.    Our Port Everglades (South), Florida marine terminal is connected by pipeline to our Port Everglades (North) terminal. CITGO Petroleum Corporation owns varying percentage interests, ranging from 25% to 50%, in specific assets at the terminal. We operate the terminal, and we are reimbursed by CITGO for a share of our expenses. The terminal is connected by pipeline to four ship berths for receiving refined products and is equipped with a truck rack that can load up to eight trucks simultaneously. The terminal receives gasolines and distillates from ships and barges for delivery via our truck rack for redistribution to locations throughout southern Florida, including Miami, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. TransMontaigne Inc., currently our onlyprincipal customer at the terminal, markets gasolines and distillates from the terminal to wholesale and retail marketers of refined products.

Competition to our Port Everglades terminals includes other terminals located in Port Everglades owned by BP p.l.c., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Amerada Hess Corporation, Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC and Motiva Enterprises LLC.

Jacksonville Terminal.    Our Jacksonville, Florida terminal stores asphalt and provides integrated terminaling services for a marketer of asphalt pursuant to a contract that extends through 2013. This terminal receives asphalt via rail and our ship berth for delivery via our truck rack to our customer for redistribution to locations throughout northern Florida and southern Georgia. Competition to our terminal includes the local Valero L.P. and Trumball Asphalt, Inc. terminals.River facilities is Valero.

Cape Canaveral Terminal.        Midwest Terminals and Pipeline Operations.    Our Cape Canaveral, Florida terminal receives gasolines, distillates, residual fuel oils and asphalt from ships and barges for delivery via our truck rack to our customers for redistribution to locations throughout central Florida, including Orlando, and via barges to TransMontaigne Inc. for delivery to cruise ships and a power plant. Our customers include TransMontaigne Inc. and a marketer of asphalt. TransMontaigne Inc. supplies gasolines, distillates and residual fuel oils from the terminal to wholesale and retail marketers of refined products, cruise ships, shipping companies and the utility industry. Competition to our terminal includes the Central Florida Pipeline terminal in Taft, an asphalt terminal in West Palm Beach and various terminals in Jacksonville and Port Everglades.

Port Manatee Terminal.    Our Port Manatee, Florida terminal receives distillates, residual fuel oils and asphalt from ships and barges for delivery via our truck rack to our customers for redistribution to locations throughout southwestern Florida, including Sarasota and Fort Myers, and via barges to residual fuel oil customers. Our customers include TransMontaigne Inc., a marketer of residual fuel oil and a marketer of asphalt. Competition to our terminal includes the various terminals in the Tampa area owned by BP p.l.c., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Amerada Hess Corporation, Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliate Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC and Murphy Oil Corporation.

9

Fisher Island Terminal.    Our Fisher Island, Florida marine terminal receives residual fuel oils and marine distillates from ships and barges on behalf of our customers for redistribution via barges to residual fuel oil customers and bunker fuel customers. TransMontaigne Inc. currently is our only customer at the terminal. TransMontaigne Inc. supplies marine fuels to cruise ships and shipping companies located within the Port of Miami, and residual fuel oils to the utility industry. Competition to our terminal includes other terminals located in Port Everglades and terminals located in the Caribbean.

Tampa Terminal.    Our Tampa, Florida marine terminal receives gasolines and distillates from ships and barges for delivery via our truck rack to TransMontaigne Inc. for redistribution to locations throughout west central Florida, including Tampa, St Petersburg, Sarasota and Fort Myers, and via the Central Florida Pipeline to Taft, Florida. TransMontaigne Inc. currently is our only customer at the terminal. TransMontaigne Inc. markets gasolines and distillates from the terminal to wholesale and retail marketers of refined products. Competition to our terminal includes other terminals located in the Tampa area owned by BP p.l.c., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Amerada Hess Corporation, Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliate Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC and Murphy Oil Corporation.

SouthwestIn Missouri and Northwest Arkansas Operations

In Southwest Missouri and Northwest Arkansas we own and operate the Razorback Pipeline and terminals in Rogers, Arkansas, at the terminus of the pipeline, and Mt. Vernon, Missouri, at the origin of the pipeline.

The following sets forth information about our existing terminaling assets in Southwest Missouri We also own and Northwest Arkansas:

10

operate a terminal facility at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The following map shows our existing Southwest Missouri and Northwest Arkansas operations:

Razorback Pipeline.    Our Razorback Pipeline is a 67 mile, 8-inch diameter interstate common carrier pipeline that transports light oil refined product on behalf of TransMontaigne Inc. from our terminal at Mt. Vernon, Missouri, where it is interconnected with a pipeline system owned by Magellan Midstream Partners, to our terminal at Rogers, Arkansas. The pipelineRazorback Pipeline has a capacity of approximately 30,000 barrels per day. The FERC regulates the transportation tariffs for interstate shipments on the Razorback Pipeline. TransMontaigne Inc. currently is the only shipper on the Razorback Pipeline.

Mt. Vernon and Rogers Terminals.    Our Mt. Vernon, Missouri terminal is the origin of the Razorback Pipeline; our Rogers, Arkansas terminal is located at the terminus of the Razorback Pipeline. The Mt. Vernon terminal receives gasolines and distillates from Magellan and ConocoPhillips pipelines for delivery via our truck rack to TransMontaigne Inc. for redistribution to locations throughout southwest Missouri and to the Razorback Pipeline for shipment to our Rogers terminal. The Rogers terminal receives gasolines and distillates from the Razorback Pipeline for delivery via our truck rack to TransMontaigne Inc. for redistribution to locations throughout northwest Arkansas. TransMontaigne Inc. currently is the only customer of the two terminals. TransMontaigne Inc. markets gasolines and distillates from the facilities to wholesale and retail marketers of refined products. Competition to our facilities includes

        Our Oklahoma City terminal receives gasolines and distillates from the Magellan Pipeline terminals in Carthage and Springfield, Missouri and Fort Smith, Arkansas; the ConocoPhillips terminal in Mt Vernon, Missouri; various terminals in North Little Rock, Arkansas; and the Sunoco and Sinclair refineries and terminal facilities in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

11

OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH TRANSMONTAIGNE INC.

General

The substantial majority ofpipeline for delivery via our business is devotedtruck rack to providing integrated terminaling and pipeline servicesa major oil company's customers for redistribution to TransMontaigne Inc. TransMontaigne Inc. accounted for approximately 64%, 59% and 70% of our revenues for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. TransMontaigne Inc., formed in 1995, is a terminaling, distribution and marketing company that supplies, distributes and markets refined petroleum products to refiners, wholesalers, distributors, marketers and industrial and commercial end userslocations throughout the United States, primarily in the Gulf Coast, Florida, East Coast and Midwest regions. TransMontaigne Inc. also provides supply chain management services to various customers throughout the United States. TransMontaigne Inc. relies on us to provide substantially all of the integrated terminaling services it requires to support its operations in Florida, Southwest Missouri and Northwest Arkansas. Pursuant to the terms of our terminaling services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc., we expect to continue to derive a substantial majority of our revenues from TransMontaigne Inc. for the foreseeable future.Oklahoma City region.

At June 30, 2005, TransMontaigne Inc. owns 43 refined product terminals, including those subject to our exclusive options to purchase, a dock facility in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 11 tug boats and 13 barges, a hydrant system in Port Everglades, and its distribution and marketing business. TransMontaigne Inc.'s distribution and marketing operations generally consist of the distribution and marketing of refined petroleum products through contract sales, rack spot sales and bulk sales in the physical markets, and providing related value-added fuel procurement and supply chain management services. TransMontaigne Inc. has a significant interest in our partnership through its indirect ownership of a 39.4% limited partner interest and a 2% general partner interest in us. TransMontaigne Inc.'s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "TMG" and is subject to the information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Exclusive Options to Purchase Additional Refined Product Terminals

Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. granted us exclusive options to purchase additional refined product terminals. In the event we exercise our option, we would seek to enter into a terminaling services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. for these terminals.

The assets and operations subject to the option include:

–>

TransMontaigne Inc.'s terminal complex located in Brownsville, Texas with a current aggregate storage capacity of approximately 2.2 million barrels;

–>

TransMontaigne Inc.'s refined product terminals located at various points along the Plantation and Colonial pipeline corridors, which extend from the Gulf Coast through the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic regions, with a current aggregate storage capacity of approximately 8.9 million barrels; and

–>

TransMontaigne Inc.'s refined product terminals located along the Mississippi and Ohio River areas, with a current aggregate storage capacity of approximately 3.2 million barrels.

The option with respect to the Brownsville complex will be exercisable for one year beginning in January 2006, the option with respect to the terminals along the Plantation and Colonial pipeline corridors will be exercisable for one year beginning in December 2007, and the option with respect to the terminals along the Mississippi and Ohio River areas will be exercisable for one year beginning in December 2008.

12

The exercise of any of the options will be subject to the negotiation of a purchase price and a terminaling services agreement relating to the terminals proposed to be purchased, and may be conditioned on obtaining various consents. Such consents may include consents of the holders of TransMontaigne Inc.'s equity or debt securities or governmental consents.

The exercise price would be determined according to a process in which, within 45 days of our notification that we wish to exercise the option, TransMontaigne Inc. would propose to our general partner the terms on which it would be willing to sell the asset, including the terms of a terminaling services agreement. Within 45 days after TransMontaigne Inc.'s delivery of its proposed terms, we would propose a cash purchase price for the assets. If we cannot agree on a purchase price after negotiating in good faith for 60 days, TransMontaigne Inc. would have the right to seek an alternative purchaser willing to pay at least 105% of the purchase price we proposed; if an alternative transaction on such terms has not been consummated within six months, we would have the right to purchase the assets at the price we originally proposed. If we do not exercise this right, TransMontaigne Inc. would be free to retain or sell the assets without restriction.

The omnibus agreement also provides that, in certain circumstances, TransMontaigne Inc. offer to sell us tangible assets it acquires or constructs in the future. These circumstances are discussed in greater detail under "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions-Omnibus Agreement; Obligation to Offer to Sell Acquired or Constructed Assets."

Terminaling Services Agreement

We have a terminaling and transportation services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. that will expire on December 31, 2011. Under this agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to transport on the Razorback Pipeline and throughput at our terminals a volume of refined products that will, at the fee and tariff schedule contained in the agreement, result in minimum revenues to us of $5 million per calendar quarter. In exchange for TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment, we agreed to provide TransMontaigne Inc. approximately 2.0 million barrels of light oil storage capacity and approximately 1.4 million barrels of heavy oil storage capacity at certain of our Florida terminals.

TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment applies only to our initial assets and may not be spread among assets we subsequently acquire. If TransMontaigne Inc. fails to meet its minimum revenue commitment in any quarter, it must pay us the amount of any shortfall within 15 days following receipt of an invoice from us. A shortfall payment may be applied as a credit in the following four quarters after TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum obligations are met.

Furthermore, if new laws or regulations that affect terminals generally are enacted that require us to make substantial and unanticipated capital expenditures at any of our terminals, we have the right to negotiate a monthly surcharge to be paid by TransMontaigne Inc. for the use of our terminals. The surcharge is intended to cover TransMontaigne Inc.'s pro rata portion of the cost of complying with these laws or regulations, after we have made efforts to mitigate their effect. If we cannot agree on a surcharge, and if we are not able to direct the affected refined products to mutually acceptable alternative terminaling assets that we own, either party has the right to remove the assets from the terminaling services agreement, and TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment will be correspondingly reduced. The surcharge does not apply in respect of routine capital expenditures.

Under the agreement, we are responsible for all refined product losses in excess of 0.10% of the refined product we receive from TransMontaigne Inc. at our terminals. We are also entitled to all product gains, including 0.10% of the refined product we receive from TransMontaigne Inc. at our terminals.

13

In the event of a force majeure event, that renders performance impossible with respect to an asset for at least 30 days, TransMontaigne Inc.'s obligations would be temporarily suspended with respect to that asset. If a force majeure event continues for 30 days or more and results in a diminution in the storage capacity we make available to TransMontaigne Inc., TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment would be reduced proportionately for the duration of the force majeure event. If such a force majeure event continues for twelve consecutive months or more, either party has the right to terminate the entire terminaling services agreement.

After the initial term, the terminaling services agreement will automatically renew for subsequent one-year periods, subject to either party's right to terminate with six months' notice. TransMontaigne Inc.'s obligations under the terminaling services agreement will not terminate if TransMontaigne Inc. no longer owns our general partner. TransMontaigne Inc. may assign the terminaling services agreement only with the consent of the conflicts committee of our general partner. Upon termination of the agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. has a right of first refusal to enter into a new terminaling services agreement with us, provided it pays no less than 105% of the fees offered by the third party.

TransMontaigne Inc. also has a right of first refusal to control any petroleum product storage capacity that is put into commercial service after May 27, 2005 or is subject to a contract which terminates or becomes terminable by us (excluding a contract renewable solely at the option of our customer), provided that TransMontaigne Inc. pays 105% of the fees offered by the third party customer.

COMPETITION

We face competition from other terminals and pipelines that may be able to supply TransMontaigne Inc. and our other customers with refined product integrated terminaling and pipeline services on a more competitive basis. We compete with national, regional and local terminal and pipeline companies, including the major integrated oil companies, of widely varying sizes, financial resources and experience. These competitors include BP p.l.c., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Amerada Hess Corporation, Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC, Murphy Oil Corporation and terminals in the Caribbean. Several of our competitors conduct portions of their operations through publicly traded partnerships with structures similar to ours, including Sunoco, Inc. and its affiliate Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., Holly Corporation and its affiliate Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Valero Energy Corporation and its affiliate Valero L.P., and Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliate Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. In particular, our ability to compete could be harmed by factors we cannot control, including:

–>

price competition from terminal and pipeline companies, some of which are substantially larger than us and have greater financial resources, and control substantially greater refined product storage capacity, than we do;

–>

the perception that another company can provide better service; and

–>

the availability of alternative supply points, or supply points located closer to TransMontaigne Inc.'s customers' operations.

We also compete with national, regional and local terminal and pipeline companies for asset acquisition and expansion opportunities. Some of these competitors are substantially larger than us and have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do.

14

BUSINESS STRATEGIES

Our primary business objective is to increase distributable cash flow per unit. The most effective means of growing our business and increasing distributions to our unitholders is to expand our asset base and infrastructure, and to increase utilization of our existing infrastructure. We intend to accomplish this by executing the following strategies:

Generate stable cash flows through the use of long-term contracts with our customers. We generate revenues from customers who pay us fees based on the volume of storage capacity contracted for, volume of refined products throughput at our terminals or volume of product transported in our pipeline.the Razorback Pipeline. We have no direct commodity price risk because we do not own any of the products throughput at our terminals or transported on our pipeline. We have a long-term terminaling services agreementagreements with Marathon, Morgan Stanley Capital Group, PMI, TransMontaigne Inc. pursuant to which TransMontaigne Inc. has agreed to pay us a guaranteedand Valero. Based on our terminaling services contracts in effect at March 1, 2007, we have minimum amountrevenue commitments from our customers of approximately $50 million for the year ending December 31, 2007. We expect that our actual revenues for the year ending December 31, 2007 will be higher because of $5 million per calendar quarter.throughput agreements with customers that do not contain minimum revenue commitments and because our customers often use other services we provide that are separate from the services covered by the minimum revenue commitments. We believe that the fee-based nature of our business, our minimum revenue commitmentcommitments from TransMontaigne Inc.,our customers, and the long-term nature of our contracts with many of our customers will provide us with stable cash flows.

Pursue strategic and accretive acquisitions in new and existing markets.    We plan to pursue acquisitions from third parties of petroleum product terminaling and transportation and terminaling assetsfacilities that are complementary to those we currently own. We also may purchase assetsfacilities outside our existing area of operations. In many cases, we would expect to pursue these acquisitions jointly with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group. We also have the right under the omnibus agreement to purchase certain assetsfacilities TransMontaigne Inc. purchases or constructs in the future, subject to the negotiation of satisfactory terms and obtaining required consents. We expect that TransMontaigne Inc. will operate the assetsfacilities it offers to us pursuant to the omnibus agreement for a period of up to two years, during which time TransMontaigne Inc.'s distribution and marketing operations will seek to increase the utilization of the assetsfacilities as well as its knowledge of the areas in which the assetsfacilities operate. We believe we will benefit from TransMontaigne Inc.'s operation of such assetsfacilities because we anticipate TransMontaigne Inc. will be more likely to enter into a long-term terminaling services agreement that includes a minimum revenue commitment with us once it has gained greater operating and market knowledge with respect to the assets.facilities. In light of the recent industry trend of large energy companies divesting their distribution and logistic assets, we believe there will continue to be significant acquisition opportunities.

We believe that our affiliation with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group will provide us with a competitive advantage in situations where we jointly pursue acquisition opportunities or where we purchase assets previously purchased or constructed by TransMontaigne Inc. As is frequently the case in the energy industry, potential acquisition opportunities maycandidates have an element of commodity price risk inherent in their pre-acquisition operations. We expect to be able to pursue such acquisitions jointly with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group in a manner that minimizes commodity price exposure to us. In these circumstances, TransMontaigne Inc. or one of its affiliatesMorgan Stanley Capital Group may assume most or all of the direct commodity price exposure inherent in the acquired business and incorporate these risks into itstheir overall trading, distribution and marketing operations. As a result of this affiliation, we believe we will be able to aggressively pursue acquisitions that otherwise would not be attractive to us or other competing potential acquirers because of theWe currently have no direct commodity price risk inherent inbecause we do not own any of the target's operations.products throughput at our terminals or transported on the pipelines we own or manage.

Maximize the benefits of our relationship with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group. OurWe believe that our exclusive options with TransMontaigne Inc. to purchase additional refined product terminals, and our affiliation with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, will provide us an opportunityopportunities to acquire additional assetsterminaling and transportation facilities and expand our operations in a manner whichthat allows us to achieve substantial utilization of our assets by linkingfacilities because of the strategic fit between our

infrastructure with Morgan Stanley Capital Group's global supply capabilities and TransMontaigne Inc.'s distribution and marketing business. In addition, our relationship with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group will

15

provide us with access to a significant pool of management talent and strong relationships throughout the energy industry that we intend to utilize to implement our strategies. TransMontaigne Inc. intendsand Morgan Stanley Capital Group intend to utilize our partnershipus as athe primary growth vehicle for itstheir terminaling and transportation business. For this reason,business and to support their physical trading and delivery businesses. As a result, we expect to have the opportunity to participate with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group in considering transactions that we would not be able to aggressively pursue on our own.

Execute cost-effective expansion and asset enhancement opportunities.    We continually evaluate opportunities to expand our existing asset base and we will consider constructing new refined product terminals and expanding existing terminal capacity where product demand is expected to increase. In addition, for markets served by waterborne terminals, larger terminal capacity can help significantly reduce freight costs for our customers because they can bring in high-growth areas in Florida and elsewhere. During the year ended June 30, 2005,larger shipments on a single vessel. As a result, we placed 355,000 barrels ofare actively examining our opportunities to expand our active storage capacity into commercial service at our Florida terminals, andGulf Coast terminals. We have been approved to expand the storage capacity at our Port Everglades terminal complex facilities by approximately 1.4 million barrels. We will continue to evaluate adding new tanks or bringing out-of-service tankage into commercial service in order to meet increasing demand for integrated terminaling services.

COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS

We believe we are well-positioned to successfully execute our business strategies successfully using the following competitive strengths:

TheWe benefit from the strategic fit between our operations and the operations of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and TransMontaigne Inc. Morgan Stanley is a leading global energy trading company with extensive trading activities focused on the energy markets, including crude oil and refined petroleum products. Morgan Stanley Capital Group's trading and risk management activities cover a broad spectrum of the energy industry with extensive resources dedicated to refined product supply and transportation. TransMontaigne Inc. is a leading distributor of unbranded refined petroleum products to independent wholesalers and industrial and commercial end users delivering approximately 300,000 barrels per day. These operations of Morgan Stanley Capital Group and TransMontaigne Inc. fit strategically with our broad geographical terminal and transportation distribution capability. Our long-term terminaling services agreement we haveservice agreements with TransMontaigne Inc. willand Morgan Stanley Capital Group, enable them to support their refined product supply, risk management and marketing businesses and, at the same time, provide us with predictable cash flows.    Westeady revenues and help ensure that our facilities are well-positioned to focus our efforts to execute our strategy of expanding our asset base because our existing operations generate predictable revenues. Under the terminaling services agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. has agreed to pay us fees to transport refined products on the Razorback Pipeline and to receive integrated terminaling services through December 31, 2011, with a guaranteed minimum amount of revenues each calendar quarter.more fully utilized.

Our relationshiprelationships with TransMontaigne Inc., including our exclusive options to purchase additional refined product terminals, enhancesand with Morgan Stanley Capital Group enhance our ability to make strategic acquisitions. Our exclusive options offer us an attractive means of expanding our asset base by allowing us to purchase from TransMontaigne Inc. additional refined product terminals that complement our existing operations. The assetsfacilities subject to the options are linked tosupport TransMontaigne Inc.'s distributionmarketing operations and marketing operations,Morgan Stanley Capital Group's trading activities, thereby allowing us to achieve substantial utilization of the assets.facilities. In addition, TransMontaigne Inc. generally is required to offer us the opportunity to buy terminal and pipeline assetstransportation facilities it purchases or constructs in the future. In connection with any purchase of assetsterminaling and transportation facilities from TransMontaigne Inc., pursuant to the exclusive options or otherwise, we expect to have the opportunity to negotiate an appropriate terminaling services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. relating to the new assets.facilities. We believe the value of any terminaling assetsfacilities we acquire will be enhanced if we can concurrently obtain a long-term terminaling services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc., or Morgan Stanley Capital Group and, therefore, our efforts to make strategic

acquisitions will be improved by our ability to jointly pursue these acquisitions with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group.

We have the financial flexibility to pursue expansion and acquisition opportunities.    We have a $75.0 million credit facility that expires in May 2010, of which we have approximately $33.0 million available at June 30, 2005 for general partnership purposes, including capital expenditures and acquisitions. In combination with our ability to issue new partnership units, we have significant resources to finance expansion projects and acquisitions.

16

We have a substantial presence in Florida, which has above-average population growth and significant cruise ship activity, and is not currently served by any local refinery or interstate refined product pipeline. Seven of our terminals serve TransMontaigne Inc.'s and our other customers' operations in metropolitan areas in Florida, which we believe to be an attractive area for the following reasons:

–>•

Refined petroleum products are largely distributed in Florida through terminals with waterborne access, such as our terminals, because Florida has no refineries or interstate refined product pipelines.



–>•

Florida's population is one of the fastest-growing in the United States, resulting in additional potential demand for refined petroleum products.



–>•

The ports served by our terminals are among the top cruise ship ports in the United States, with year-round demand.

The terminaling services agreements we have with TransMontaigne Inc. and other significant customers will provide us with predictable cash flows. We are well-positioned to execute our strategy of expanding our asset base because our existing operations generate predictable revenues. We have a high occupancy rate of our storage capacity, which enables us to focus on expanding existing terminal capacities and acquiring additional terminal capacity for our current and future customers. A detailed discussion of the terms of several of our significant terminaling services agreements is provided below under "—Significant Customer Relationships—Terminaling Services Agreements."

Our geographical diversification allows us to provide customers with broad geographical presence to meet their needs. With the addition of the Brownsville terminal complex and the River facilities, we have significantly increased the geographic distribution of our terminals. Brownsville is the primary point of receipt and delivery for refined petroleum products and other chemicals between the United States and Mexico. Our Brownsville terminal complex handles a variety of products in addition to refined petroleum products, such as: liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, naphtha, wax, fertilizer and chemicals. The River facilities significantly expand our terminal facilities outside of the Gulf Coast and the Midwest. As a result, we are able to provide more services to customers in more areas, and to serve customers that were not operating in our prior geographic areas.

Through TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group, our general partner has access to a knowledgeable management team with significant experience in the energy industry and in executing acquisition and expansion strategies. The members of our general partner's management team have significant experience with regard to the implementation of acquisition, operating and growth strategies in many facets of the energy industry, including crude oil marketing and transportation; natural gas and natural gas liquid gathering, processing, transportation and marketing; propane storage, transportation and marketing; and refined petroleum product storage, transportation and marketing. In addition, overOver the course of their respective careers, members of theour general partner's management team have established strong, long-standing relationships within the energy industry, which we believe will enable us to grow and expand our business through both acquisition and internal expansion. In addition, through our affiliation with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, we have strong relationships throughout the energy industry.

COMPETITION

        We face competition from other terminals and pipelines that may be able to supply our customers with refined product integrated terminaling and transportation services on a more competitive basis. We compete with national, regional and local terminal and transportation companies, including the major integrated oil companies, of widely varying sizes, financial resources and experience. These competitors include BP p.l.c., Chevron U.S.A. Inc., CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Conoco Phillips, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Amerada Hess Corporation, Holly Corporation and its affiliate Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliate Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC, Murphy Oil Corporation, Sunoco, Inc. and its affiliate Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., Valero L.P. and terminals in the Caribbean. In particular, our ability to compete could be harmed by factors we cannot control, including:

•

price competition from terminal and transportation companies, some of which are substantially larger than us and have greater financial resources, and control substantially greater refined product storage capacity, than we do;



•

the perception that another company can provide better service; and



•

the availability of alternative supply points, or supply points located closer to our customers' operations.

        We also compete with national, regional and local terminal and transportation companies for acquisition and expansion opportunities. Some of these competitors are substantially larger than us and have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do.

SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS

        We have several significant customer relationships that we expect to continue to derive the substantial majority of our revenues from for the foreseeable future. These relationships include:

Our Relationship With TransMontaigne Inc. And Morgan Stanley Capital Group

General. A significant portion of our business is devoted to providing integrated terminaling and transportation services to TransMontaigne Inc. Pursuant to the terms of our terminaling services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc., we expect to continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenues from TransMontaigne Inc. for the foreseeable future.

        We are controlled by our general partner, TransMontaigne GP L.L.C., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc. TransMontaigne Inc., formed in 1995, is a terminaling, distribution and marketing company that markets refined petroleum products to wholesalers, distributors, marketers and industrial and commercial end users throughout the United States, primarily in the Gulf Coast, East Coast and Midwest regions. TransMontaigne Inc. also provides supply chain management services to various customers throughout the United States. At December 31, 2006, TransMontaigne Inc. owned 26 refined product terminals, of which 24 terminals are subject to our exclusive options to purchase, 14 tug boats and 20 barges, a hydrant system in Port Everglades, and its distribution and marketing

business. TransMontaigne Inc.'s marketing operations generally consist of the distribution and marketing of refined petroleum products through contract and rack spot sales in the physical markets, and providing related value-added fuel procurement and supply chain management services. On September 1, 2006, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Capital Group purchased all of the issued and outstanding common stock of TransMontaigne Inc. TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group have a significant interest in our partnership through their indirect ownership of approximately 44.6% limited partner interest and a 2% general partner interest.

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group is a leading global commodity trader involved in proprietary and counterparty-driven trading in numerous commodities markets including crude oil and refined petroleum products, natural gas and natural gas liquids, coal, electric power, base and precious metals and others. Morgan Stanley Capital Group has been actively trading crude oil and products for over 20 years and on a daily basis trades millions of barrels of physical crude oil and refined petroleum products and exchange-traded and over-the-counter crude oil and refined petroleum product derivative instruments. Morgan Stanley Capital Group also invests as principal in acquisitions, including the acquisition of TransMontaigne Inc., that complement Morgan Stanley's commodity trading activities. Morgan Stanley Capital Group has substantial strategic long-term storage capacity located on all three coasts of the United States, in Northwest Europe and Asia.

        Exclusive Options to Purchase Additional Refined Product Terminals.    TransMontaigne Inc. has granted us an exclusive option to purchase its refined product terminals located at various points along the Plantation and Colonial pipeline corridors, which extend from the Gulf Coast through the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic regions, with a current aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 8.5 million barrels. The option with respect to the terminals along the Plantation and Colonial pipeline corridors will be exercisable for one year beginning in December 2007.

        The exercise of the option will be subject to the negotiation of a purchase price and a terminaling services agreement relating to the terminals proposed to be purchased, and may be conditioned on obtaining various consents. Such consents may include consents of the holders of TransMontaigne Inc.'s credit facilities or governmental consents.

        The exercise price would be determined according to a process in which, within 45 days of our notification that we wish to exercise the option, TransMontaigne Inc. would propose to our general partner the terms on which it would be willing to sell the terminals, including the terms of a terminaling services agreement. Within 45 days after TransMontaigne Inc.'s delivery of its proposed terms, we would propose a cash purchase price for the terminals. If we cannot agree on a purchase price after negotiating in good faith for 60 days, TransMontaigne Inc. would have the right to seek an alternative purchaser willing to pay at least 105% of the purchase price we proposed; if an alternative transaction on such terms has not been consummated within six months, we would have the right to purchase the terminals at the price we originally proposed. If we do not exercise this right, TransMontaigne Inc. would be free to retain or sell the facilities without restriction.

        TransMontaigne Inc. also has offered to sell us tangible assets it acquires or constructs in the future. These circumstances are discussed in greater detail under "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Omnibus Agreement; Obligation to Offer to Sell Acquired or Constructed Assets."

Terminaling Services Agreements

        Terminaling Services Agreement Relating to Gulf Coast (Florida) and Midwest Facilities.    We have a terminaling and transportation services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. relating to our Florida and Midwest terminals that will expire on December 31, 2013. Under this agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to throughput at our Florida and Midwest terminals and transport on the Razorback Pipeline a volume of refined products that will, at the fee and tariff schedule contained in the agreement, result in

minimum revenues to us of $5 million per quarter, or $20 million per year. TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment applies only to the Florida terminals and Midwest terminals acquired by us on May 27, 2005, and may not be spread among facilities we subsequently acquire. In exchange for TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment, we agreed to provide TransMontaigne Inc. approximately 2.6 million barrels of light oil storage capacity and approximately 1.3 million barrels of heavy oil storage capacity at certain of our Florida terminals. If TransMontaigne Inc. fails to meet its minimum revenue commitment in any quarter, it must pay us the amount of any shortfall within 15 business days following receipt of an invoice from us. A shortfall payment may be applied as a credit in the following four quarters after TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum obligations are met.

        Gulf Coast (Mobile) Terminaling Services Agreement.    We have a terminaling and transportation services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. that will expire on December 31, 2012. Under this agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to throughput at our Mobile terminal certain minimum volumes of refined products that will result in minimum revenues to us of $2.1 million per year. In exchange for TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum throughput commitment, we agreed to provide TransMontaigne Inc. approximately 46,000 barrels of light oil storage capacity and approximately 65,000 barrels of heavy oil storage capacity at the terminal. If TransMontaigne Inc. fails to meet its minimum revenue commitment in any year, it must pay us the amount of any shortfall within 15 business days following receipt of an invoice from us. A shortfall payment may be applied as a credit in the following year after TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum obligations are met.

        Asphalt Terminaling Services Agreement.    On February 20, 2006, we entered into a new five-year terminaling services agreement with Marathon regarding approximately 1.0 million barrels of asphalt storage capacity throughout our Florida facilities. The terminaling services agreement became effective February 20, 2006 at our Jacksonville and Port Manatee, Florida facilities and on May 1, 2006 at our Cape Canaveral and Port Everglades, Florida facilities. Concurrently with the effective dates of the Marathon Agreement, our prior agreement with our former asphalt customer for the use of this storage capacity expired.

        River Facilities Terminaling Services Agreement.    We have a terminaling services agreement with Valero that will expire on April 1, 2013. Pursuant to the terminaling services agreement, we agreed to provide Valero with approximately 1.0 million barrels of light oil storage capacity at our Cape Girardeau, Evansville, Greenville, Henderson, Owensboro and Paducah terminals. Valero also has a right to match any third-party offer to use or lease any new or converted light oil petroleum product storage capacity that we put into commercial service at any of the terminals subject to the agreement. If Valero fails to exercise its right to match, it has the right to terminate the agreement in its entirety or with respect to the applicable terminal.

        Brownsville LPG Terminaling Services Agreement.    We have a terminaling and transportation services agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. relating to our Brownsville terminal that will expire on March 31, 2010. Under this agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to throughput at our terminals certain minimum volumes of natural gas liquids that will result in minimum revenues to us of $1.4 million per year. In exchange for TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum throughput commitment, we agreed to provide TransMontaigne Inc. approximately 33,700 barrels of storage capacity at our Brownsville, Texas terminal complex.

        PMI Terminaling Services Agreements.    We have five (5) terminaling services agreements with PMI relating to our Brownsville facilities that, if not renewed, will expire between May 31, 2007 and June 30, 2016. Under these agreements, PMI agreed to throughput and store at our terminals certain minimum volumes of diesel, gasoline, natural gasoline, distillate, and naphtha liquids. We also manage and operate a 17-mile bi-directional pipeline on behalf of PMI on a cost-plus basis.

        Morgan Stanley Capital Group Terminaling Services Agreement.    On November 1, 2006, we entered into a terminaling services agreement with Morgan Stanley Capital Group relating to our Brownsville facilities that will expire on October 31, 2010. Under this agreement, Morgan Stanley Capital Group agreed to store a specified minimum amount of fuel oils at our terminals that will result in minimum revenues to us of approximately $2.2 million per year. In exchange for its minimum revenue commitment, we agreed to provide Morgan Stanley Capital Group a minimum amount of storage capacity for such fuel oils.

        Oklahoma City Terminaling Services Agreement.    We have a revenue support agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. that provides that in the event any current third-party terminaling agreement should expire, TransMontaigne Inc. agrees to enter into a terminaling services agreement that will expire no earlier than November 1, 2012. The agreement provides that TransMontaigne Inc. agrees to throughput certain minimum volumes of refined product that will result in minimum revenues to us of $0.8 million per year. TransMontaigne Inc.'s minimum revenue commitment currently is not in effect because a major oil company is under contract for the utilization of the light oil storage capacity at the terminal.

        Other Terminaling Services Agreements.    We also have terminaling service agreements with other customers at our terminal facilities for throughput and storage of refined petroleum products, LPGs and other products. These agreements include various minimum throughput commitments, storage commitments and other terms, including duration, that we negotiate on a case-by-case basis.

TERMINALS AND PIPELINE CONTROL OPERATIONS

Our pipeline is        The pipelines we own or operate are operated via geosynchronous satellite, microwave, radio and frame relay communication systems from a central control room located in Atlanta, Georgia. We also monitor activity at our terminals from this control room.

The control center operates with state-of-the-art System Control and Data Acquisition, or SCADA, systems. Our control center is equipped with computer systems designed to continuously monitor operational data, including refined product throughput, flow rates and pressures. In addition, the control center monitors alarms and throughput balances. The control center operates remote pumps, motors, engines, and valves associated with the receipt of refined products. The computer systems are designed to enhance leak-detection capabilities, sound automatic alarms if operational conditions outside of pre-established parameters occur, and provide for remote-controlled shutdown of pump stations on the pipeline. Pump stations and meter-measurement points on the pipeline are linked by satellite or telephone communication systems for remote monitoring and control, which reduces our requirement for full-time on-site personnel at most of these locations.

        Despite these controls, during the year ended December 31, 2006, two unrelated releases of product (gasoline and fuel oil, respectively) resulted in aggregate unreimbursed environmental remediation costs and product losses of approximately $1.2 million. Each was due to human error and did not involve any system malfunctions. We have analyzed the causes of these accidents and have taken steps designed to reduce the likelihood of similar events in the future.

SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE

We perform preventive and normal maintenance on ourthe pipeline and terminal systemsystems we operate or own and make repairs and replacements when necessary or appropriate. We also conduct routine and required inspections of ourthe pipeline and terminal tanks we operate or own as required by code or regulation. External coatings and impressed current cathodic protection systems are used to protect against external corrosion. We conduct all

17

cathodic protection work in accordance with National Association of Corrosion Engineers standards. We continually monitor, test, and record the effectiveness of these corrosion inhibiting systems.

We monitor the structural integrity of selected segments of our Razorback Pipeline, systemwhich we own, and the bi-directional refined products pipeline that we operate and maintain on behalf of PMI through a program of periodic internal inspections as well as hydrostatic testing that conforms to Federal standards. Beginning in 2002, the Department of Transportation, or DOT, required internal inspections or other integrity testing of all DOT-regulated crude oil and refined product pipelines. We internally tested the Razorback Pipeline in 2004 and have completed all necessary repairs and maintenance.

Maintenance facilities containing equipment for pipe repairs, spare parts, and trained response personnel are located along the Razorback Pipeline.Pipeline and the bi-directional refined products pipeline that we manage for PMI. Employees participate in simulated spill deployment exercises on a regular basis. They also participate in actual spill response boom deployment exercises in planned spill scenarios in accordance with Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requirements. We believe that the Razorback Pipeline haspipelines we own and manage have been constructed and isare maintained in all material respects in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and the regulations and standards prescribed by the American Petroleum Institute, the DOT, and accepted industry practice.

At our terminals, tanks designed for gasoline storage are equipped with internal or external floating roofs that minimize emissions and prevent potentially flammable vapor accumulation between fluid levels and the roof of the tank. Our terminal facilities have facility response plans, spill prevention and control plans, and other plans and programs to respond to emergencies.

Many of our terminal loading racks are protected with water deluge systems activated by either heat sensors or an emergency switch. Several of our terminals also are protected by foam systems that are activated in case of fire. All of our terminals are subject to participation in a comprehensive environmental management program to assure compliance with applicable air, solid waste, and wastewater regulations.

SAFETY REGULATION

We are subject to regulation by the United States Department of Transportation under the Accountable Pipeline and Safety Partnership Act of 1996, sometimes referred to as the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act or HLPSA, and comparable state statutes relating to the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of ourthe pipeline facilities.facilities we operate or own. HLPSA covers petroleum and petroleum products and requires any entity that owns or operates pipeline facilities to comply with such regulations and also to permit access to and copying of records and to make certain reports and provide information as required by the Secretary of Transportation. We believe that we are in material compliance with these HLPSA regulations.

The United States Department of Transportation Office of Pipeline Safety, or OPS, has promulgated regulations that require qualification of pipeline personnel. These regulations require pipeline operators to develop and maintain a written qualification program for individuals performing covered tasks on pipeline facilities. The intent of this regulationthese regulations is to ensure a qualified work force and to reduce the probability and consequence of incidents caused by human error. The regulation establishesregulations establish qualification requirements for individuals performing covered tasks, and amends certain training requirements in existing regulations. We believe that we are in material compliance with these OPS regulations.

We also are subject to OPS regulation for High Consequence Areas, or HCAs, for Category 2 pipeline systems (companies operating less than 500 miles of jurisdictional pipeline). This regulation specifies how to assess, evaluate, repair and validate the integrity of pipeline segments that could impact

18

populated areas, areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage and commercially navigable waterways, in the event of a release. The Razorback Pipeline ispipelines we own or manage are subject to these requirements. The regulation requires an integrity management program that utilizes internal pipeline

inspection, pressure testing, or other equally effective means to assess the integrity of pipeline segments in HCAs. The program requires periodic review of pipeline segments in HCAs to ensure adequate preventative and mitigative measures exist. Through this program, we evaluated a range of threats to each pipeline segment's integrity by analyzing available information about the pipeline segment and consequences of a failure in an HCA. The regulation requires prompt action to address integrity issues raised by the assessment and analysis. The complete baseline assessment of all segments must be performed by February 17, 2009, with intermediate compliance deadlines prior to that date. We believe that we are in material compliance with the OPS regulation of HCAs.have completed baseline assessments for all segments.

Our Florida terminals also are subject to various state regulations regarding our storage of refined product in aboveground storage tanks. These regulations require, among other things, registration of tanks, financial assurances and inspection and testing, consistent with the standards established by the American Petroleum Institute. We have completed baseline assessments for all of the segments and believe that we are in material compliance with these aboveground storage tank regulations.

We also are subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, and comparable state statutes that regulate the protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the Federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act, and comparable state statutes require us to organize and disclose information about the hazardous materials used in our operations. Certain parts of this information must be reported to employees, state and local governmental authorities, and local citizens upon request. We believe that we are in material compliance with OSHA and state requirements, including general industry standards, record keeping requirements and monitoring of occupational exposures.

In general, we expect to increase our expenditures during the next decade to comply with higher industry and regulatory safety standards such as those described above. Although we cannot estimate the magnitude of such expenditures at this time, we do not believe that they will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Our operations are subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety and the environment. As an owner or operator of refined petroleum product terminals and pipelines, we must comply with these laws and regulations at federal, state and local levels. These laws and regulations can restrict or impact our business activities in many ways, such as:

–>•

requiring remedial action to mitigate releases of hydrocarbons, hazardous substances or wastes caused by our operations or attributable to former operators;



–>•

requiring capital expenditures to comply with environmental control requirements; and



–>•

enjoining the operations of facilities deemed in non-compliance with permits issued pursuant to such environmental laws and regulations.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of remedial requirements, and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations. Certain environmental statutes impose strict, joint and several liability for costs required to clean up and restore sites where

19

hydrocarbons, hazardous substances or wastes have been released or disposed of. Moreover, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hydrocarbons, hazardous substances or other wastes into the environment.

The trend in environmental regulation is to place more restrictions and limitations on activities that may affect the environment. As a result, there can be no assurance as to the amount or timing of future expenditures for environmental compliance or remediation, and actual future expenditures may be different from the amounts we currently anticipate. We try to anticipate future regulatory requirements that might be imposed and to plan accordingly to remain in compliance with changing environmental laws and regulations and to minimize the costs of such compliance.

We do not believe that compliance with federal, state or local environmental laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations. In addition, we believe that the various environmental activities in which we are presently engaged are not expected to materially interrupt or diminish our operational ability. We cannot assure you, however, that future events, such as changes in existing laws, the promulgation of new laws, or the development or discovery of new facts or conditions will not cause us to incur significant costs. The following is a discussion of certain material environmental and safety concerns that relate to our business.

        During 2006, two unrelated releases of product at our facilities, each of which was caused by human error and did not involve any system malfunctions, resulted in approximately $1.2 million in unreimbursed environmental remediation costs and product losses. Remediation has been completed on one site, while assessment and remediation is ongoing at the second site pursuant to a remediation plan negotiated with the state environmental agency overseeing the remediation project.

Water

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, renamed and amended as the Clean Water Act or CWA, imposes strict controls against the discharge of oil and its derivates into navigable waters. The CWA provides penalties for any discharges of petroleum products in reportable quantities and imposes substantial potential liability for the costs of removing an oil or hazardous substance spill. State laws for the control of water pollution also provide for various civil and criminal penalties and liabilities in the event of a release of petroleum or its derivatives in surface waters or into the groundwater. Spill prevention control and countermeasure requirements of federal laws require appropriate containment berms and similar structures to help prevent the contamination of navigable waters in the event of a petroleum tank spill, rupture or leak. A containment berm is an earthen or cement barrier, impervious to liquids, which surrounds a storage tank holding between 1,000 and 500,000 gallons of petroleum products or other hazardous materials and used to prevent spilling and extensive damage to the environment. The berm is a form of secondary containment with the storage tank itself being the primary instrument of containment.

Contamination resulting from spills or releases of refined petroleum products is an inherent risk in the petroleum terminal and pipeline industry. To the extent that groundwater contamination requiring remediation exists around the assetsfacilities we own as a result of past operations, we believe any such contamination can be controlled or remedied without having a material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, such costs are often unpredictable and are site specific and, therefore, the effect may be material in the aggregate.

The primary federal law for oil spill liability is the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended, or OPA, which addresses three principal areas of oil pollution—prevention, containment and cleanup. It applies to vessels, offshore platforms, and onshore facilities, including terminals, pipelines and transfer facilities. In order to handle, store or transport oil, shore facilities are required to file oil spill response plans with the United States Coast Guard, the OPS, or the EPA. Numerous states have enacted laws similar to OPA. Under OPA and similar state laws, responsible parties for a regulated facility from which oil is discharged may be liable for removal costs and natural resources damages. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with regulations pursuant to OPA and similar state laws.

20

We do not have any terminal location that discharges any type of process wastewater.wastewater to the environment. We are, however, subject to various types of storm water discharge requirements at our terminals. The EPA has adopted regulations that require us to obtain permits to discharge certain storm water run-off. Storm water discharge permits also may be required by certain states in which we operate. Such permits may require us to monitor and sample the effluent from our operations. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with effluent limitations at our facilities and with the CWA generally.

Our storm water discharges generally fall into two categories: petroleum contact and non-contact. The sources of contact water are the truck loading operations at some of the terminals. Some of our terminal locations do not have contact water discharges because of the use of closed-loop water handling systems, thus obviating the need for discharge permits. The water generated in these closed-loop systems is transported offsite and disposed of properly. At locations where contact water is discharged on site, permit conditions dictate control technology requirements, effluent limitations and confirmation sampling. Non-contact storm water is generated at most terminal locations, primarily from rainfall collection in aboveground storage tank secondary containment enclosures or dikes. Various types of storm water permits regulate these discharges, with most being "General" state-wide industry specific mechanisms. The cost involved in obtaining and renewing these storm water permits is not material.

Air emissions

Our operations are subject to the federal Clean Air Act and comparable state and local statutes. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 require most industrial operations in the United States to incur capital expenditures to meet the air emission control standards that are developed and implemented by the EPA and state environmental agencies. Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, any of our facilities that emit volatile organic compounds or nitrogen oxides and are located in ozone non-attainment areas face increasingly stringent regulations, including requirements to install various levels of control technology on sources of pollutants. Some of our facilities have been included within the categories of hazardous air pollutant sources. The Clean Air Act regulations are still being implemented by the EPA and state agencies. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing standards and regulations pursuant to the Clean Air Act and similar state and local laws, and we do not anticipate that implementation of additional regulations will have a material adverse effect on us.

Air permits are required for our terminaling operations that result in the emission of regulated air contaminants. These operations in general include fugitive volatile organic compounds (primarily hydrocarbons) from truck loading activities and tank working losses. The sources of these emissions are strictly regulated through the permitting process. Such regulation includes stringent control technology and extensive permit review and periodic renewal. The cost involved in obtaining and renewing these permits is not material.

Hazardous and solid waste

Our operations are subject to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, or RCRA, and comparable state laws, which impose detailed requirements for the handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of hazardous and solid waste. All of our terminal facilities are classified by the U.S. EPA as Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators. Our terminals do not generate hazardous waste except on isolated and infrequent cases. At such times, only third party disposal sites which have been audited and approved by us are used. Our operations also generate solid wastes which are regulated under state law or the less stringent solid waste requirements of RCRA. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the existing requirements of RCRA and similar state and local laws, and the cost involved in complying with these requirements is not material.

21

Site remediation

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or CERCLA, also known as the "Superfund" law, and comparable state laws impose liability without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons responsible for the release of hazardous substances into the environment. Such classes of persons include the current and past owners or operators of sites where a hazardous substance was released, and companies that disposed or arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at offsite locations such as landfills. In the course of our operations we will generate wastes or handle substances that may fall within the definition of a "hazardous substance." CERCLA authorizes the U.S. EPA and, in some cases, third parties to take actions in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible classes of persons the costs they incur. Under CERCLA, we could be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up and restoring sites where hazardous substances have been released, for damages to natural resources, and for the costs of certain health studies. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the existing requirements of CERCLA.

We currently own, lease, or operate numerous properties and facilities that for many years have been used for industrial activities, including refined product terminaling operations. Hazardous substances, wastes, or hydrocarbons may have been released on or under the properties owned or leased by us, or on or under other locations where such substances have been taken for disposal. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties or by previous owners whose treatment and disposal or release of hazardous substances, wastes, or hydrocarbons, was not under our control. These properties and the substances disposed or released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to remove previously disposed substances and wastes (including substances disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), remediate contaminated property (including groundwater contamination, whether from prior owners or operators or other historic activities or spills), or perform remedial plugging or pit closure operations to prevent future contamination.

In connection with its acquisition of five Florida terminals from an affiliate of El Paso Corporation, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to assume responsibility for known environmental conditions at the acquired terminals. TransMontaigne Inc. currently is undertaking, or evaluating the need for, remediation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at the acquired Florida terminals. The total cost for remediating the contamination at these acquired terminal locations currently is estimated by TransMontaigne Inc. to be between $3.0$2.9 million and $5.1$5.0 million. TransMontaigne Inc.'s activities are being administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under state-administered programs that encourage and help to fund all or a portion of the cleanup of contaminated sites. Under these programs, TransMontaigne Inc. believes that it is eligible to receive state reimbursement of the majority of the costs associated with the remediation of the acquired sites. As such, TransMontaigne Inc. believes that its share of the total liability after state reimbursement, as estimated by it, is between $1.0$0.9 million and $3.1$3.0 million. Costs incurred to remediate existing contamination at the Florida terminals historically owned by TransMontaigne Inc. have been, and are expected in the future to be, insignificant. As part of

        Under the omnibus agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. retained 100% of these liabilities. Additionally, TransMontaigne Inc. will agreehas agreed to indemnify us for other remediationfive years after May 27, 2005 against certain potential environmental claims, losses and expenses associated with the operation of the Florida and Midwest terminals and occurring before May 27, 2005. TransMontaigne Inc.'s maximum liability for this indemnification obligation is $15 million and has no obligation to indemnify us for aggregate losses until such aggregate losses exceed $250,000. TransMontaigne Inc. has no indemnification obligations with respect to environmental claims made as a result of additions to or modifications of environmental laws promulgated after May 27, 2005. We have agreed to indemnify TransMontaigne Inc. against environmental liabilities in some circumstances,related to our facilities, to

the extent these liabilities are not subject to a deductible, maximum liability, and time limit as discussed underTransMontaigne Inc.'s indemnification obligations (see "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Omnibus Agreement; Indemnification").

        Under the purchase agreement for the refined product terminal in Mobile, Alabama, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to indemnify us through December 2008, against certain potential environmental liabilities associated with the operation of this annual report.the Mobile terminal that occurred on or prior to January 1, 2006. Our environmental losses must first exceed $200,000 and TransMontaigne Inc.'s indemnification obligations are capped at $2.5 million. The cap amount does not apply to any environmental liabilities known to exist as of January 1, 2006.

        Under the purchase agreement for the Brownsville and River facilities, TransMontaigne Inc. agreed to indemnify us through December 2011, against certain potential environmental liabilities associated with the operation of the Brownsville and River facilities that occurred on or prior to December 31, 2006. Our environmental losses must first exceed $250,000 and TransMontaigne Inc.'s indemnification obligations are capped at $15 million. The cap amount does not apply to any environmental liabilities known to exist as of December 31, 2006.

22

Endangered Species Act

The Endangered Species Act restricts activities that may affect endangered species or their habitats. While some of our facilities are in areas that may be designated as habitat for endangered species, we believe that we are in substantial compliance with the Endangered Species Act. However, the discovery of previously unidentified endangered species could cause us to incur additional costs or become subject to operating restrictions or bans in the affected area.

OPERATIONAL HAZARDS AND INSURANCE

Our terminal and pipeline facilities may experience damage as a result of an accident or natural disaster. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution or environmental damage and suspension of operations. We maintain insurance of various types that we consider adequate to cover our operations and properties.

The insurance covers all of our assetsfacilities in amounts that we consider to be reasonable. The insurance policies are subject to deductibles that we consider reasonable and not excessive. Our insurance does not cover every potential risk associated with operating terminals, pipelines and other facilities, including the potential loss of significant revenues. Consistent with insurance coverage generally available to the industry, our insurance policies provide limited coverage for losses or liabilities relating to pollution, with broader coverage for sudden and accidental occurrences. The events of September 11, 2001, and their overall effect on the insurance industry have adversely impacted the availability and cost of coverage. Due to these events, insurers have excluded acts of terrorism and sabotage from our insurance policies.

We share some insurance policies, including our general liability policy, with TransMontaigne Inc. These policies contain caps on the insurer's maximum liability under the policy, and claims made by either of TransMontaigne Inc. or us are applied against the caps. The possibility exists that, in any event in which we wish to make a claim under a shared insurance policy, our claim could be denied or only partially satisfied due to claims made by TransMontaigne Inc. against the policy cap.

TARIFF REGULATION

The Razorback Pipeline, which runs between Mt. Vernon, Missouri and Rogers, Arkansas, is an interstate petroleum products pipeline and is subject to regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, under the Interstate Commerce Act and the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and rules and orders promulgated under those statutes. The bi-directional refined products pipeline that we

manage for PMI is not interstate and, therefore, is not subject to FERC regulations. FERC regulation requires that the rates of interstate oil pipeline ratespipelines, such as those of the Razorback Pipeline, be filed at FERC and posted publicly, and that these rates be "just and reasonable" and nondiscriminatory. Rates of interstate oil pipeline companies are currently regulated by the FERC primarily through an index methodology, whereby a pipeline is allowed to change its rates based on the change from year to year in the Producer Price Index for finished goods. In the alternative, interstate oil pipeline companies may elect to support rate filings by using a cost-of-service methodology, competitive market showings or actual agreements between shippers and the oil pipeline company.

Under current FERC regulations, we are permitted to charge "just and reasonable," non-discriminatory tariffs for the transportation of refined products through the Razorback Pipeline.        The FERC generally has not investigated interstate rates on its own initiative when those rates have not been the subject of a protest or a complaint by a shipper. A shipper or other party having a substantial economic interest in our rates could, however, challenge our rates. In response to such challenges, the FERC could investigate our rates. If our rates were successfully challenged, the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders could be materially reduced. In the absence of a challenge to our rates,

23

given our ability to utilize either postedfiled rates subject to increases tied to the Producer Price Index,as annually indexed or to utilize rates tied to cost of service methodology, competitive market showing or actual agreements between shippers and us, we do not believe that these regulations would have any negative material monetary impact on us unless the regulations were substantially modified in such a manner so as to prevent a pipeline transportation company's ability to earn a fair return for the shipment of petroleum products utilizing its transportation system, which we believe to be an unlikely scenario.

On July 20, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ("D.C. Circuit") issued its opinion inBP West Coast Products, LLC v. FERC, which vacated the portion of the FERC's decision applying theLakehead policy, under which the FERC allowed a regulated entity organized as a master limited partnership to include in its cost-of-service an income tax allowance to the extent that entity's unitholders were corporations subject to income tax. On December 2, 2004, the FERC issued a Notice of Inquiry that called for comments regarding whetherBP West Coast applies broadly or only to the specific facts of that case. In response to the comments received, on May 4, 2005, the FERC adopted a policy statement providing that all entities owning public utility assets—oil and gas pipelines and electric utilities—would be permitted to include an income tax allowance in their cost-of-service rates to reflect the actual or potential income tax liability attributable to their public utility income, regardless of the form of ownership. Any tax pass-through entity seeking an income tax allowance would have to establish that its partners or members have an actual or potential income tax obligation on the entity's public utility income. The FERC expressed the intent to implement its policy in individual rate proceedings as they arise. Evaluation of theultimate impact of this new policy statement will haveremains uncertain because it is being challenged before the D.C. Circuit and is being refined as it is applied in individual cases. The case before the D.C. Circuit has been briefed and argued and is currently pending decision. If the D.C. Circuit or FERC were to await further developmentsact to substantially reduce or eliminate the right of a master limited partnership to include in various pending cases.its cost-of-service an income tax allowance to reflect actual or potential income tax liability on public utility income, it may become more difficult for the Razorback Pipeline to justify its rates if they were challenged in a protest or complaint.

TITLE TO PROPERTIES

Our pipeline        The Razorback Pipeline is constructed on rights-of-way granted by the apparent record owners of the property and in some instances these rights-of-way are revocable at the election of the grantor. Several rights-of-way for our pipelinethe Razorback Pipeline and other real property assets are shared with other pipelines and other assets owned by affiliates of TransMontaigne Inc. and by third parties. In many instances, lands over which rights-of-way have been obtained are subject to prior liens that have not been subordinated to the right-of-way grants. We have obtained permits from public authorities to cross over or under, or to lay facilities in or along, watercourses, county roads, municipal streets, and state highways and, in some instances, these permits are revocable at the election of the grantor. We have also obtained permits from railroad companies to cross over or under lands or rights-of-way, many of which are also revocable at the grantor's election. In some cases, property for pipeline purposes was purchased in fee.

Some of the leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits, licenses and franchise ordinances transferred to us will require the consent of the grantor to transfer these rights, which in some instances is a governmental entity. Our general partner has obtained or is in the process of obtaining sufficient third-party consents, permits, and authorizations for the transfer of the assetsfacilities necessary for us to operate our business in all material respects as described in this annual report. With respect to any consents, permits, or authorizations that have not been obtained, our general partner believes that these consents, permits, or authorizations will be obtained, or that the failure to obtain these consents, permits, or authorizations would not have a material adverse effect on the operation of our business.

Our general partner believes that we have satisfactory title to all of our assets. Record title to some of our assets may continue to be held by affiliates of TransMontaigne Inc. until we have made the appropriate filings in the jurisdictions in which such assets are located and obtained any consents and approvals that were not obtained prior to transfer. We will make these filings and request these consents, the granting of which is subject to the discretion of the applicable governmental entity.

24

Although title to these properties is subject to encumbrances in some cases, such as customary interests generally retained in connection with acquisition of real property, liens that can be imposed in some jurisdictions for government-initiated action to clean up environmental contamination, liens for current taxes and other burdens, and easements, restrictions, and other encumbrances to which the underlying properties were subject at the time of acquisition by TransMontaigne Partners (Predecessor) or us, our general partner believes that none of these burdens should materially detract from the value of these properties or from our interest in these properties or should materially interfere with their use in the operation of our business.

EMPLOYEES

TransMontaigne GP L.L.C. ("TransMontaigne GP"), is our general partner and manages our operations and activities. TransMontaigne Services Inc., is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc., and is the sole member of TransMontaigne GP. TransMontaigne Services Inc. employs the people who provide support to TransMontaigne Inc.'s operations as well as our operations. At August 29, 2005,February 23, 2007, TransMontaigne Services Inc. had approximately 727729 full-time employees, of which 85 of these employeeswhom 190 provide services directly to us. At August 29, 2005,February 23, 2007, none of TransMontaigne Services Inc.'s employees thatwho provide services directly to us waswere covered by a collective bargaining agreement. TransMontaigne Services Inc. considers its employee relations to be good.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business, operations and financial condition are subject to various risks. You should consider carefully the following risk factors, in addition to the other information set forth in this annual report in connection with any investment in our securities. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be able to continue to make distribution on our common units at current levels, or at all. As a result of any of these risks, the market value of our common units representing limited partnership interests could decline, and investors could lose all or a part of their investment.

We depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a substantial majority of our revenues. A substantial reduction of those revenues would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

        We expect to derive a substantial majority of our revenues from TransMontaigne Inc., Morgan Stanley Capital Group and our other significant customers for the foreseeable future. Events that adversely affect the business operations of any one or more of our significant customers may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Therefore, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of our significant customers, many of which are similar to the business risks we face. For

example, a material decline in refined petroleum product supplies available to our customers, or a significant decrease in our customers' ability to negotiate marketing contracts on favorable terms, could result in a material decline in the use of our tank capacity or throughput of product at our terminal facilities, which would likely cause our revenues and results of operations to decline. In addition, if any of our significant customers is unable to meet their minimum revenue or other commitments to us for any reason, then our revenues and cash flow would decline.

Our credit facility requires that we reduce our leverage during 2007, which may limit our flexibility in pursuing other business opportunities.

        In connection with our acquisition of the Brownsville terminal complex and River facilities in December 2006, we incurred substantial indebtedness under our amended and restated credit facility. As amended and restated, the credit facility contains covenants that require us to meet certain ratio tests relating to our leverage, including our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage and maximum secured leverage. In order to agree to fund the purchase price of the River and Brownsville facilities, the lenders participating in our credit facility required that we reduce our leverage before September 30, 2007, which we anticipate accomplishing with the issuance of new units representing limited partnership units. The need to reduce our leverage may distract management from other operational issues and business opportunities, including the completion of additional acquisitions. As a result, until we reduce our leverage, our ability to grow our business may be limited and our operations could be adversely affected.

        If we are unable to successfully reduce our leverage to the extent required by the credit facility, we would have to seek a waiver from our lenders. To secure such a waiver, we could have to expend significant fees and expenses, including the payment of fees to the lenders, and we cannot be assured that we would be successful. If we were unsuccessful in securing a waiver, we would be in default under our credit facility and would have to replace it, if possible. Any replacement would not necessarily be on favorable terms and could significantly limit our operations and future business opportunities.

If one or more of our significant customers do not continue to engage us to provide services after the expiration of their current terminaling services agreements and we are unable to secure comparable alternative arrangements, our financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

        TransMontaigne Inc.'s obligations under the terminaling services agreement relating to our Florida and Midwest facilities expire on December 31, 2013, subject thereafter to automatic one-year renewals if neither party provides notice of termination. In addition, our terminaling services agreements with several of our other significant customers expire on various dates from 2007 to 2016. After the expiration of each of these terminaling services agreements, the customers may elect not to continue to engage us to provide services. In addition, even if a significant customer does engage us, the terms of any renegotiated agreement may be less favorable than the agreement it replaces. In either case, we may not be able to generate sufficient additional revenues from third parties to replace any shortfall in revenues or increase in costs. Additionally, we may incur substantial costs if modifications to our terminals are required in order to attract substitute customers or provide alternative services. To the extent a significant customer does not extend or renew its terminaling services agreement, if we extend or renew the terminaling services agreement on less favorable terms, or if we must incur substantial costs to attract substitute customers, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business involves many hazards and operational risks, including adverse weather conditions, which could cause us to incur substantial liabilities.

        Our operations are subject to the many hazards inherent in the transportation and terminaling of petroleum products, including:

•

explosions, fires, accidents;



•

extreme weather conditions, such as hurricanes, tropical storms, and rough seas, which are common along the U.S. Gulf Coast;



•

damage to pipelines, storage tanks and related equipment;



•

leaks or releases of petroleum products into the environment; and



•

acts of terrorism or vandalism.

        If any of these events were to occur, we could suffer substantial losses because of personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, and pollution or other environmental damage resulting in curtailment or suspension of our related operations. In addition, mechanical malfunctions, faulty measurement or other errors may result in significant costs or lost revenues.

TransMontaigne may not elect to renew the omnibus agreement when it expires, which could have an adverse impact on our business operations and financial condition.

        Under the omnibus agreement, we currently pay TransMontaigne Inc. an annual administrative fee of $6.9 million for centralized corporate functions, such as management, legal, accounting, treasury, insurance administration and claims processing, health, safety and environmental, information technology, human resources, credit, payroll, taxes and engineering and other corporate services. The omnibus agreement will expire in May 2008, unless extended. TransMontaigne Inc. may elect not to extend the term of the omnibus agreement, or may only agree to extend the omnibus agreement on terms that are less favorable to us than the current terms.

        If TransMontaigne Inc. does not extend the omnibus agreement or does not offer to extend the omnibus agreement on terms that we find acceptable, we may have to seek to replace the services that TransMontaigne Inc. provides with a third party service provider. We may not be able to obtain similar services from independent third parties on economical terms or at all. If such services are unavailable or available at unfavorable rates, we would need to hire qualified managerial, technical and administrative personnel. The process of hiring, training and successfully integrating qualified personnel into our operations would be lengthy and would divert management's time and attention from managing our operations. Moreover, personnel with the qualifications we require may be unavailable and personnel with experience and contacts in the industry similar to the employees of TransMontaigne Inc. will likely be difficult to replace. Our failure to hire and retain qualified employees could cause an interruption in our business and have an adverse effect on our operations. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.

We are exposed to the credit risks of TransMontaigne Inc. and our other significant customers, which could affect our creditworthiness. Any material nonpayment or nonperformance by such customers could also adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        Because of TransMontaigne Inc.'s ownership interest in and control of us, the strong operational links between TransMontaigne Inc. and us, and our reliance on TransMontaigne Inc. for a substantial portion of our revenues, if one or more credit rating agencies were to view unfavorably the credit quality of TransMontaigne Inc., we could experience an increase in our borrowing costs or difficulty accessing capital markets. Such a development could adversely affect our ability to grow our business.

In addition to our dependence on TransMontaigne Inc., we are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our third party customers. Some of our customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory risks. Any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our other key customers could require us to pursue substitute customers for our affected assets or provide alternative services. There can be no assurance that any such efforts would be successful or would provide similar fees. These events could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, any future growth will be limited.

        Our ability to grow is dependent principally on our ability to make acquisitions that are attractive because they are expected to result in an increase in our quarterly distributions to unitholders. Our acquisition strategy is based, in part, on our expectation of ongoing divestitures of refined product terminal and transportation facilities by large industry participants. A material decrease in such divestitures would limit our opportunities for future acquisitions and could adversely affect our operations and cash flows.

        In addition, we may be unable to make attractive acquisitions for any of the following reasons, among others:

•

because we are unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with them, or acceptable terminaling services contracts with them or another customer;



•

because we are unable to raise financing for such acquisitions on economically acceptable terms; or



•

because we are outbid by competitors, some of which are substantially larger than us and have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do.

        If we consummate future acquisitions, our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly.

Any acquisitions we make are subject to substantial risks, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        Any acquisition involves potential risks, including risks that we may:

•

fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost-savings or cash flow enhancements;



•

decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;



•

significantly increase our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;



•

encounter difficulties operating in new geographic areas or new lines of business;



•

incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with the business or assets acquired, including upon exercise of our exclusive options with TransMontaigne Inc., for which we are not indemnified or for which the indemnity is inadequate;



•

be unable to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate our growing business and assets;



•

less effectively manage our historical assets, because of the diversion of management's attention from other business concerns; or

•

incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges.

        If any acquisitions we ultimately consummate result in one or more of these outcomes, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our exclusive options to purchase additional refined product terminals from TransMontaigne Inc. are subject to significant risks and uncertainty, and thus these options may never be exercised, which could limit our ability to grow our business.

        TransMontaigne Inc. granted us exclusive options to purchase additional refined product terminals. The exercise of the options with respect to any additional terminals will be subject to the negotiation of a purchase price and, if appropriate, a terminaling services agreement relating to the terminals proposed to be purchased, and may be conditioned on obtaining various consents. Such consents may include consents of third parties or governmental consents. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to successfully negotiate a purchase price or that any necessary consents will be obtained. Additionally, our management or the conflicts committee of our general partner may conclude that it does not wish to cause us to exercise these options when they become exercisable, and their decision will not be subject to unitholder approval.

        If for any reason the exercise of an option is not consummated, our ability to grow our business may be limited. In addition, if we do not acquire the facilities subject to the options, TransMontaigne Inc. or another purchaser of the relevant facilities may use the facilities to compete with us.

We may not be able to obtain financing for the exercise of our exclusive options to purchase additional refined product terminals from TransMontaigne Inc., which could limit our ability to grow our business.

        Even if the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner concludes that exercising an option to acquire additional refined product terminals from TransMontaigne Inc. would be beneficial to us, we may be unable to obtain the financing necessary to exercise the option. To fund the exercise of an option, we would be required to use cash from operations or incur borrowings or raise capital through the sale of debt or additional equity securities. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, as well as by adverse market conditions resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control.

Expanding our business by constructing new facilities subjects us to risks that the project may not be completed on schedule, and that the costs associated with the project may exceed our expectations, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        The construction of additions or modifications to our existing terminal and transportation facilities, and the construction of new terminals and pipelines, involves numerous regulatory, environmental, political, legal and operational uncertainties beyond our control and requires the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. If we undertake these projects, they may not be completed on schedule or at all or at the budgeted cost. Moreover, our revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For instance, if we construct additional storage capacity, the construction may occur over an extended period of time, and we will not receive any material increases in revenues until the project is completed. Moreover, we may construct additional storage capacity to capture anticipated future growth in consumption of refined products in a market in which such growth does not materialize.

A significant decrease in demand for refined products in the areas served by our terminals and pipeline would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        A sustained decrease in demand for refined products in the areas served by our terminals and pipeline could significantly reduce our revenues. Factors that could lead to a decrease in market demand include:

•

a recession or other adverse economic condition that results in lower spending by consumers on gasolines, distillates, and travel;



•

an increase in the market price of crude oil that leads to higher refined product prices;



•

higher fuel taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions that increase, directly or indirectly, the cost of gasolines or other refined products;



•

a decline in demand in the Florida cruise ship industry, which is a significant source of revenue to TransMontaigne Inc., which is our largest customer at our Florida terminal facilities; and



•

a shift by consumers to more fuel-efficient or alternative fuel vehicles or an increase in fuel economy, whether as a result of technological advances by manufacturers, pending legislation proposing to mandate higher fuel economy, or otherwise.

Competition from other terminals and pipelines that are able to supply TransMontaigne Inc.'s and Morgan Stanley Capital Group's customers with refined petroleum products storage capacity at a lower price could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        We face competition from other terminals and pipelines that may be able to supply TransMontaigne Inc., Morgan Stanley Capital Group and other distribution and marketing customers with integrated terminaling services on a more competitive basis. We compete with national, regional and local terminal and pipeline companies, including the major integrated oil companies, of widely varying sizes, financial resources and experience. Our ability to compete could be harmed by factors we cannot control, including:

•

price competition from terminal and transportation companies, some of which are substantially larger than us and have greater financial resources, and control substantially greater refined product storage capacity, than we do;



•

the perception that another company may provide better service; and



•

the availability of alternative supply points or supply points located closer to our customers' operations.

        If we are unable to compete with services offered by other petroleum enterprises, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

        In addition, TransMontaigne Inc. may engage in competition with us under certain conditions. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. has agreed to offer us certain tangible assets it acquires or constructs related to the storage, transportation or terminaling of refined petroleum products in the United States. If we decline any such offer, TransMontaigne Inc. will be free to use the asset to compete with us or to sell the asset without restriction. If we indicate our desire to purchase the assets, but we cannot agree on the terms, TransMontaigne Inc. has the right to sell the asset, subject to certain restrictions, to a third party. Either event would increase competition in the area in which the asset is located.

Because of our lack of asset diversification, adverse developments in our terminals or pipeline operations could adversely affect our revenues and cash flows.

        We rely exclusively on the revenues generated from our terminals and pipeline operations. Because of our lack of diversification in asset type, an adverse development in these businesses would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse assets.

Our operations are subject to governmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities.

        Our business is subject to the jurisdiction of numerous governmental agencies that enforce complex and stringent laws and regulations with respect to a wide range of environmental, safety and other regulatory matters. We could be adversely affected by increased costs resulting from more strict pollution control requirements or liabilities resulting from non-compliance with required operating or other regulatory permits. New environmental laws and regulations might adversely impact our activities, including the transportation, storage and distribution of refined petroleum products. Federal, state and local agencies also could impose additional safety requirements, any of which could affect our profitability. In addition, we face the risk of accidental releases or spills associated with our operations, which could result in material costs and liabilities, including those relating to claims for damages to property and persons. Failure by us to comply with environmental or safety related laws and regulations could result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory and remedial obligations and even the issuance of injunctions that restrict or prohibit the performance of our operations.

Terrorist attacks, and the threat of terrorist attacks, have resulted in increased costs to our business. Continued hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military campaigns may adversely impact our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

        The long-term impact of terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, and the threat of future terrorist attacks, on the energy transportation industry in general, and on us in particular, is not known at this time. Increased security measures taken by us as a precaution against possible terrorist attacks have resulted in increased costs to our business. Uncertainty surrounding continued hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military campaigns may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including the possibility that infrastructure facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terrorism.

The obligations of several of our key customers under their terminaling services agreements may be reduced or suspended in some circumstances, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        Our agreements with several of our significant customers provide that, if any of a number of events occur, which we refer to as events of force majeure, and the event renders performance impossible with respect to a facility, usually for a specified minimum period of days, our customer's obligations would be temporarily suspended with respect to that facility. In that case, a significant customer's minimum revenue commitment may be reduced or the contract may be subject to termination. As a result, our revenues and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We are not fully insured against all risks incident to our business, and could incur substantial liabilities as a result.

        In accordance with typical industry practice, we do not have any property insurance on the Razorback Pipeline. Furthermore, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain of our insurance policies have increased substantially, and could escalate further. In some

instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. For example, our insurance carriers require broad exclusions for losses due to terrorist acts. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

        We share some insurance policies, including our general liability policy, with TransMontaigne Inc. These policies contain caps on the insurer's maximum liability under the policy, and claims made by either of TransMontaigne Inc. or us are applied against the caps. The possibility exists that, in any event in which we wish to make a claim under a shared insurance policy, our claim could be denied or only partially satisfied due to claims made by TransMontaigne Inc. against the policy cap.

Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities.

        Our level of debt could have important consequences to us. For example our level of debt could:

•

impair our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for distributions to unitholders, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;



•

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to make principal and interest payments on our debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for operations and future business opportunities;



•

make us more vulnerable to competitive pressures, changes in interest rates or a downturn in our business or the economy generally;



•

impair our ability to make distributions to our unitholders; and



•

limit our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions.

        If our operating results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital. We may not be able to effect any of these actions on satisfactory terms, or at all.

        Our credit facility also contains covenants limiting our ability to make distributions to unitholders in certain circumstances. In addition, our credit facility contains various covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to incur indebtedness, grant liens or enter into a merger, consolidation or sale of assets. Furthermore, our credit facility contains covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios and tests. Any future breach of any of these covenants or our failure to meet any of these ratios or conditions could result in a default under the terms of our credit facility, which could result in acceleration of our debt and other financial obligations. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could initiate a bankruptcy proceeding or liquidation proceeding or proceed against the collateral.

TransMontaigne Inc. controls our general partner, which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations. TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to favor their own interests to our detriment.

        TransMontaigne Services Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc., owns and controls our general partner. TransMontaigne Inc., in turn, is wholly-owned by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, which is the principal commodities trading arm of Morgan Stanley. Neither our general partner nor its board of directors is elected by our unitholders and our unitholders have no right to elect our general partner or its board of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. Furthermore, unitholders have limited ability to remove our general partner.

        Although our general partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders, the directors and officers of our general partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owner, TransMontaigne Services Inc. Furthermore, two of our general partner's directors, and all of its executive officers, are affiliated with TransMontaigne Inc. and one of our general partner's directors is affiliated with Morgan Stanley Capital Group. Therefore, conflicts of interest may arise between TransMontaigne Inc. and its affiliates, including Morgan Stanley Capital Group and our general partner, on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. In resolving those conflicts of interest, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the interests of our unitholders.

        The following are potential conflicts of interest:

•

TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group, as users of our pipeline and terminals, have economic incentives not to cause us to seek higher tariffs or higher terminaling service fees, even if such higher rates or terminaling service fees would reflect rates that could be obtained in arm's-length, third-party transactions.



•

TransMontaigne Inc. and its affiliates may engage in competition with us under certain circumstances.



•

Neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires TransMontaigne Inc. or Morgan Stanley Capital Group to pursue a business strategy that favors us. TransMontaigne Inc.'s and Morgan Stanley Capital Group's respective directors and officers have fiduciary duties to make decisions in the best interests of those companies, which may be contrary to our interests.



•

Our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group, in resolving conflicts of interest.



•

Officers of TransMontaigne Inc. who provide services to us also devote significant time to the businesses of TransMontaigne Inc., and are compensated by TransMontaigne Inc. for the services rendered to it.



•

Our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its fiduciary duties, and also has restricted the remedies available to our unitholders for actions that, without the limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.



•

Our general partner determines the amount and timing of acquisitions and dispositions, capital expenditures, borrowings, issuance of additional partnership securities, and reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders.



•

Our general partner determines the amount and timing of any capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is a maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating surplus, or an expansion capital expenditure, which does not reduce operating surplus. That determination can affect the amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders and the ability of the subordinated units to convert to common units.



•

Our general partner may use an amount, initially equal to $11.9 million, which would not otherwise constitute operating surplus, in order to permit the payment of cash distributions on the subordinated units or incentive distribution rights.



•

Our general partner determines which out-of-pocket costs incurred by TransMontaigne Inc. are reimbursable by us.



•

Our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf.

•

Our general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our contractual and other obligations.



•

Our general partner may exercise its limited right to call and purchase common units if it and its affiliates own more than 80% of the common units.



•

Our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed to us by our general partner and its affiliates, including the terminaling services agreements with TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group.



•

Our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel, accountants, or others to perform services for us.

The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.

        Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. If TransMontaigne Inc. ceases to control our general partner, our exclusive option to purchase refined product terminals from TransMontaigne Inc. under the omnibus agreement would terminate. The termination of such option could adversely impact our ability to grow through the acquisition of additional refined product terminals, which could have an adverse effect on our operations. Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of the members of our general partner from transferring their respective limited liability company interests in our general partner to a third party. The new members of our general partner then would be in a position to replace the board of directors and officers of our general partner with their own choices and to control the decisions taken by the board of directors and officers.

Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as well as our not being subject to entity-level taxation by states. If the Internal Revenue Service were to treat us as a corporation or if we were to become subject to entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, then our cash flows would be substantially reduced.

        The anticipated after-tax benefit of an investment in the common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.

        If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our income at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%. Distributions to our unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses, deductions or credits would flow through to our unitholders. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, our cash flows would be substantially reduced. Thus, treatment of us as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to our unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of the common units.

        Current law may change, causing us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subjecting us to entity-level taxation. For example, because of widespread state budget deficits, several states are evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the imposition of state income, franchise or other forms of taxation. If any state were to impose a tax upon us as an entity, our cash flows would be reduced. For example, under recently enacted legislation, we will be subject to a new entity level tax payable in 2008 on the portion of our total revenue (as that term is defined in the legislation) that is generated in Texas beginning in our tax year ending December 31, 2007. Specifically, the Texas margin tax will be imposed at a maximum effective rate of 0.7% of our total revenue that is apportioned to Texas. Imposition of such a tax on us by Texas, or any other state, will reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders. The partnership agreement provides that if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects us to entity-level taxation for federal, state

or local income tax purposes, then the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the target distribution amounts will be reduced to reflect the impact of that law on us.

If the IRS were to successfully challenge our use of a calendar taxable year for federal income tax purposes, the challenge may result in adjustments to the federal income tax liability of our unitholders, the imposition of tax penalties on us and we may have difficulty providing our unitholders with all of the information necessary to timely file their federal income tax returns. As a result, the market for our common units may be adversely affected and our relations with our unitholders could suffer.

        Under the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, we are required to use a taxable year that is determined by reference to the taxable years of our partners. If holders of a majority of the interests in our capital and profits use a single taxable year, we must use that year. If there is no such "majority interest taxable year," and if no person with a taxable year different from that of our general partner and its affiliates owns a 5% or greater interest in our capital or profits, then we must use the same taxable year as our general partner and its affiliates. If there is no majority interest taxable year and there is an owner, other than our general partner and its affiliates, of 5% or more of our capital or profits that has a taxable year different from that of our general partner and its affiliates, we must use the taxable year that produces the "least aggregate deferral" to holders of partnership interests. In general, these determinations are made on the first day of each taxable year.

        There are significant factual and legal uncertainties in applying these rules to us because:

•

our general partner and its affiliates have not used, and do not currently use, the calendar year as their taxable year;



•

we have limited information as to the taxable years of the holders of our common units; and



•

the regulations prescribing the time and manner for determining the interest of a partner in our profits are susceptible to multiple interpretations.

        Our initial taxable year ended on June 30, 2005, because our general partner and its affiliates, who used a June 30 taxable year at the time we were organized, initially owned all of the interests in our profits and capital. We have taken the position that we were required to change our taxable year to the calendar year as of July 1, 2005, on the basis that the calendar year was our "majority interest taxable year" due to public ownership of our common units by calendar year taxpayers. In view of the factual and legal uncertainties regarding the taxable year that we are required to use, our position that we are required to use the calendar year as our taxable year is also based in part upon the fact that the calendar year is (i) the simplest and most administrable taxable year for a publicly traded partnership, (ii) to our knowledge, the taxable year used by all other publicly traded partnerships and (iii) the default taxable year originally provided by the Internal Revenue Code for partnerships in certain other circumstances. Based upon that position, we used the calendar year as our taxable year for 2006 and plan to use the calendar year as our taxable year for 2007. The IRS, however, could disagree with the position we have taken.

        If we are required to change our taxable year to a year other than the calendar year, we may have difficulty providing certain unitholders with information about our income, gain, loss and deduction for our taxable year in a manner that allows those unitholders to timely file their federal income tax returns for the years in which they are required to include their share of our income, gain, loss and deduction. In addition, if we are required to change our taxable year as a result of an IRS challenge of our use of the calendar year for a taxable year as to which we and our unitholders have already filed a federal income tax return, the change may result in an adjustment to a unitholder's federal income tax liability and we could be subject to penalties. In that event, our relations with our unitholders could suffer. Moreover, if we were not allowed to use a calendar year end for tax purposes, many existing and potential unitholders that do have a calendar tax year may not be willing to purchase our units,

which could adversely affect the market price of our units and limit our ability to raise capital through public or private offerings of our units in the future.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

        None.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

TransMontaigne Inc. has agreed to indemnify us for any losses we may suffer as a result of legal claims for actions that occurred prior to the closing of our initial public offering on May 27, 2005.

We currently are not a party to any material litigation. Our operations are subject to a variety of risks and disputes normally incident to our business. As a result, at any given time we may be a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We maintainare a beneficiary of various insurance policies TransMontaigne Inc. maintains with insurers in amounts and with coverage and deductibles as theour general partner believes are reasonable and prudent. However, we cannot assure that this insurance will be adequate to protect us from all material expenses related to potential future claims for personal and property damage or that the levels of insurance will be available in the future at economical prices.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of the security holders, through solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fiscal yearperiod covered by this annual report.

25

Part II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON UNITS, RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On May 24, 2005, our registration statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No.: 333-123219), as amended, that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to our initial public offering became effective. The managing underwriter was UBS Investment Bank. The closing date of our initial public offering was May 27, 2005. On that date we sold 3,350,000 common units to the public at a price of $21.40 per common unit, or $71.7 million. The underwriting discount on this sale was $4.7 million, excluding structuring fees of $0.4 million paid to UBS Securities LLC. On June 3, 2005, the underwriters closed on the exercise of their over-allotment option to acquire an additional 502,500 common units at the initial public offering price of $21.40 per unit, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $10.0 million, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses of approximately $0.8 million. We repurchased 502,500 common units from a subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc. at $20.01 per unit to satisfy the over-allotment option.

Concurrent with the closing of our initial public offering, we (1) entered into and borrowed $31.5 million under our $75 million revolving credit agreement and incurred $0.9 million of debt issuance costs and related expenses and (2) issued 450,000 subordinated units to MSDW Bondbook Ventures, Inc., an affiliate of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc., for $7.9 million in a private offering exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. A summary of the proceeds received and the use of proceeds is as follow (in millions).

MARKET FOR COMMON UNITS

The common units are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "TLP." On August 29, 2005,March 2, 2007, there were approximately 40 unit holders17 unitholders of record of our common units. This number does not include unit holdersunitholders whose units are held in trust by other entities. The actual number of unit holdersunitholders is greater than the number of unit holdersunitholders of record.

26

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low per unit sales prices for our common units as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

DISTRIBUTIONS OF AVAILABLE CASH

A        The following table sets forth the distribution of $0.15declared per common unit attributable to the periods indicated:

        The distribution for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 was paid on August 9, 2005, and reflects the pro rata portion of the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.40 per common unit for the period from the closing of the initial public offering on May 27, 2005 through June 30, 2005.

Within approximately 45 days after the end of each quarter, we will distribute all of our available cash, as defined in our partnership agreement, to unitholders of record on the applicable record date. Available cash generally means all cash on hand at the end of the quarter:

–>•

less the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner to:



->•

provide for the proper conduct of our business;



->•

comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments, or other agreements; or



->•

provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters;



–>•

plus, if our general partner so determines, all or a portion of cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter.

Distributions of Available Cash During the Subordination Period

Common       ��During the subordination period, common units are entitled to receive distributions from operating surplus of $0.40 per unit per quarter (which we refer to as the minimum quarterly distribution), or $1.60 per unit per year, plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior quarters, before any such distributions are paid on our subordinated units. At June 30, 2005,December 31, 2006, there were 3,972,500 common units issued and outstanding. At December 31, 2006, the amounts of available cash from operating surplus needed to pay the minimum quarterly distribution for one quarter and for four quarters on the common units, the subordinated units, and the general partner units were approximately:

We will make distributions of available cash from operating surplus for any quarter during the subordination period in the following manner:

–>•

First, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter;



–>•

Second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior quarters during the subordination period;



27

---

–>•

Third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until we distribute for each subordinated unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; and



–>•

Thereafter, cash in excess of the minimum quarterly distributions is distributed to unitholders and the general partner based onin the incentive distribution rights held by our general partner.manner described under "—Incentive Distribution Rights" below.

Distributions of Available Cash After the Subordination Period

At June 30, 2005,December 31, 2006, there were 3,322,266 subordinated units issued and outstanding. The subordination period generally will generally not end until June 30, 2010. However, a portion of the subordinated units may be converted into common units at an earlier date on a one-for-one basis based on the achievement of certain financial goals as defined in our partnership agreement.

Upon expiration of the subordination period, each outstanding subordinated unit will convert into one common unit and will then participate pro rata with the other common units in distributions of available cash.

We will make distributions of available cash for any quarter after the subordination period in the following manner:

–>•

First, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner until we distribute for each outstanding unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; and



–>•

Thereafter, in the manner described under "—Incentive Distribution Rights" below.

Incentive Distribution Rights

Incentive distribution rights are a non-voting limited partner interest that represent the right to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved. Our general partner currently holds the incentive distribution rights, but may transfer these rights separately from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in the partnership agreement.

The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of the additional available cash from operating surplus between the unitholders and our general partner up to the various target distribution levels. The amounts set forth under "Marginal percentage interest in distributions" are the percentage interests of our general partner and the unitholders in any available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and including the corresponding amount in the column "Total quarterly distribution," until available cash from operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for the unitholders and our general partner for the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth below for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume our general partner has contributed any additional

28

capital to maintain its 2% general partner interest and has not transferred its incentive distribution rights.

There is no guarantee that we will be able to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units in any quarter, and we will be prohibited from making any distributions to unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or an event of default is existing, under our senior secured credit facility.

Common Unit Repurchases for the quarter ended June 30, 2005December 31, 2006

Following is a summary of        There were no common unit repurchases for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except average price per share):December 31, 2006.

(a)

On June 3, 2005, the underwriters closed the exercise of their over-allotment option to acquire an additional 502,500 common units at the initial public offering price of $21.40 per unit, less the underwriting discount of $1.39 per common unit. We repurchased 502,500 common units from a subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc. to satisfy the requirements of the over-allotment option.

For information on our equity compensation plans, see "Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management—Equity Compensation Plan Information."

29

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected historical financial data of TransMontaigne Partners for the periods and as of the dates indicated. The following selected financial data for the year ended December 31, 2006, six months ended December 31, 2005 and each of the years in the five-yearfour-year period ended June 30, 2005, has been derived from our consolidated financial statements. We adopted a December 31 year end for financial and tax reporting purposes effective December 31, 2005; we previously maintained a June 30 year end. You should not expect the results for any prior periods to be indicative of the results that may be achieved in future periods. You should read the following information together with our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes and with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this annual report.

(1)

Effective June 30, 2002, TransMontaigne Inc. acquired the remaining 40% interest that it did not own in the Razorback Pipeline system.

(2)

The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Coastal Fuels assets from the closing date of their acquisition by TransMontaigne Inc. (February 28, 2003). See Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements.

(3)

The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Mobile, Alabama terminal facility from the closing date of its acquisition by TransMontaigne Inc. (August 1, 2005). See Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements.

(4)

The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Oklahoma City terminal from the closing date of our acquisition (October 31, 2005). See Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements.

(5)

The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Brownsville and River terminal facilities from the closing date of Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.'s acquisition of TransMontaigne Inc. (September 1, 2006). See Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements.

30

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

OVERVIEW

We are a refined petroleum products terminaling and pipeline transportation company formed by TransMontaigne Inc. Our initialAt December 31, 2006, our operations consist of certain terminal and pipeline assets that were contributed to us by TransMontaigne Inc. Specifically, the contributed assets are composed of:

–>•

seven refined product terminals located in Florida, with an aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 5.85.5 million barrels, that provide integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc., other distribution and marketing companies and the United States government;



–>•

a 67-mile, interstate refined products pipeline, which we refer to as the Razorback Pipeline, that currently transports gasolines and distillates for TransMontaigne Inc. from Mt. Vernon, Missouri to Rogers, Arkansas; and



–>•

two refined product terminals, one located in Mt. Vernon, Missouri and the other located in Rogers, Arkansas, with an aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 400,000404,000 barrels, that are connected to the Razorback Pipeline and provide integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc.;



•

one refined product terminal located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 157,000 barrels, that provides integrated terminaling services to a major oil company;



•

one refined product terminal located in Mobile, Alabama with aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 235,000 barrels that provides integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc. and other distribution and marketing companies;



•

one refined product terminal located in Brownsville, Texas with aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 2.2 million barrels that provides integrated terminaling services to TransMontaigne Inc. and other distribution and marketing companies; and



•

twelve refined product terminals located along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers ("River terminals") with aggregate active storage capacity of approximately 2.7 million barrels and the Baton Rouge, Louisiana dock facility that provide integrated terminaling services to third-party distribution and marketing companies.

We conduct our operations in the United States in Florida, Southwest Missouri and Northwest Arkansas and provide integrated terminaling, storage, pipelinetransportation and related services for companies engaged in the distribution and marketing of refined products and crude oil, including TransMontaigne Inc. We handle light refined products such(such as gasolines, distillates (including heating oil) and jet fuels;fuels); heavy refined products such(such as residual fuel oils and asphalt;asphalt); and crude oil. Currently all of our operations are located in the United States.

The substantial majority of our business is devoted to providing terminaling and pipelinetransportation services to TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group. TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 56%, 70%, 64%, 59% and 70%59% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006, six months ended December 31, 2005 and the years ended June 30, 2005 2004 and 2003,2004, respectively. TransMontaigne Inc., formed in 1995, is a terminaling, distribution and marketing company that supplies, distributes and markets refined petroleum products to refiners, wholesalers, distributors, marketers and industrial and commercial end users throughout the United

States, primarily in the Gulf Coast, Florida, East Coast and Midwest regions. TransMontaigne Inc. also provides supply chain management services to various customers throughout the United States. TransMontaigne Inc. currently relies on us to provide substantially all the integrated terminaling services it requires to support its operations along the Gulf Coast, in Florida, Southwest MissouriBrownsville, Texas, along the Mississippi and Northwest Arkansas.Ohio rivers, and in the Midwest. Pursuant to the terms of a terminaling services agreementagreements we have executed on May 27, 2005 with TransMontaigne Inc., we expect to continue to derive a substantial majority of our revenues from TransMontaigne Inc. for the foreseeable future.

        We are controlled by our general partner, TransMontaigne GP L.L.C., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc. hasEffective September 1, 2006, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, purchased all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TransMontaigne Inc. Morgan Stanley Capital Group is the principal commodities trading arm of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley Capital Group is a leading global commodity trader involved in proprietary and counterparty-driven trading in numerous commodities including crude oil, refined petroleum products, natural gas and natural gas liquids, coal, electric power, base and precious metals, and others. Morgan Stanley Capital Group engages in trading both physical commodities, like the refined petroleum products that we handle in our terminals, and exchange or over-the-counter commodities derivative instruments. As a result of Morgan Stanley's acquisition of TransMontaigne Inc., Morgan Stanley became the indirect owner of our general partner. TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley have a significant interest in our partnership through itstheir indirect ownership of a 39.4%44.6% limited partner interest, and a 2% general partner interest and the incentive distribution rights.

        Incentive distribution rights are a non-voting limited partner interest that represents the right to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved. The following table illustrates the percentage allocations between the unitholders and our general partner up to the various target distribution levels. The amounts set forth under "Marginal percentage interest in us.distributions" are the percentage interests of our general partner and the unitholders in any amount we distribute up to and including the corresponding amount in the column "Total quarterly distribution," until our quarterly distribution reaches the next target distribution level, if any. The percentage interests set forth below for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume our general partner has contributed any additional capital to maintain its 2% general partner interest and has not transferred its incentive distribution rights.

We do not take ownership of or market products that we handle or transport and, therefore, we are not directly exposed to changes in commodity prices, except for the value of product gains and losses arising from our terminaling services agreements with our customers. The volume of product that is handled, transported through or stored in our terminals and pipeline is directly affected by the level of

31

supply and demand in the wholesale markets served by our terminals and pipeline. Overall supply of refined products in the wholesale markets is influenced by the products' absolute prices, the availability of capacity on delivering pipelines and vessels, fluctuating refinery margins and the markets' perception of future product prices. The demand for gasoline in Northwest Arkansas and Southwest Missouri peaks during the summer driving season, which extends from April to September, and declines during the fall and winter months. The demand for gasoline in Florida typically peaks in the winter season due to the influx of visitors to the state. The demand for

marine fuels typically peaks in the winter months due to the increase in the number of cruise ships originating from the Florida ports. Despite these seasonalities, the overall impact on the volume of product throughput in our terminals and pipeline is not material.

Our assets, liabilities and results of operations reflect the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the contributed assets during the periods presented as described below.

SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005DECEMBER 31, 2006

In April 2005,        Effective January 1, 2006, we acquired from TransMontaigne Inc. a refined product terminal in Mobile, Alabama in exchange for a cash payment of approximately $17.9 million.

        On January 19, 2006, we announced a distribution of $0.40 per unit payable on February 8, 2006 to unitholders of record on January 31, 2006.

        On January 19, 2006, we announced a program for the repurchase, from time to time, of outstanding common units of the Partnership for purposes of making subsequent grants of restricted units under the Partnership's long-term incentive plan to key employees and executive officers of TransMontaigne Services Inc. and the non-employee directors of our general partner. On September 1, 2006 TransMontaigne Inc. was acquired by Morgan Stanley Capital Group resulting in the acceleration of vesting of all restricted phantom units and restricted common stock. As a result of the merger between TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group, repurchases of outstanding common units under the program were discontinued.

        On February 20, 2006, we entered into a new three-yearfive-year terminaling services agreement with Marathon Petroleum Company LLC ("Marathon") regarding approximately 1.0 million barrels of asphalt storage capacity throughout our Florida facilities. The terminaling services agreement with Gulf Atlantic Operations LLC ("Gulf Atlantic") for the utilization of this asphalt storage capacity was amended to allow for cancellations coinciding with the effective dates within the terminaling services agreement with Marathon. Effective May 1, 2006, our terminaling services agreement with Gulf Atlantic expired. The change from Gulf Atlantic to Marathon did not have a marketermaterial impact on our results of operations or cash flows.

        On April 19, 2006, we announced a distribution of $0.43 per unit payable on May 9, 2006 to unitholders of record on April 28, 2006.

        On June 18, 2006, we incurred a release of approximately 3,000 barrels of residual fuel oil at our Mobile, Alabama terminal facility due to human error. We currently estimate that is expected to generatewe will incur unreimbursed environmental remediation costs and product losses of approximately $1.3 million in annual revenues.$0.5 million.

On May 9, 2005, weJune 22, 2006, TransMontaigne Inc. announced that it had entered into a $75 million senior secured credit facility that matures on May 9, 2010.

On May 27, 2005, we closed on the sale of 3,350,000 common units representing limited partnership interests in an initial public offering at a price of $21.40 per common unit, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $63.0 million, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses of approximately $8.7 million.

On May 27, 2005, we closed on the sale of 450,000 subordinated units representing limited partnership interests in a private placement transactiondefinitive merger agreement with an affiliate of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, pursuant to which all the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of TransMontaigne Inc., resulting would be acquired. We were not a party to that merger agreement. The merger between TransMontaigne Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group was completed on September 1, 2006, and Morgan Stanley Capital Group now controls our general partner. We currently cannot predict whether or in proceedswhat manner Morgan Stanley Capital Group's control of our general partner will change our operations.

        On July 21, 2006, we announced a distribution of $0.43 per unit payable on August 8, 2006 to unitholders of record on July 31, 2006.

        Effective September 1, 2006, we amended our Terminaling Services Agreement with TransMontaigne Inc. The amendment eliminated the retention by us of a loss allowance on product receipts at our Florida terminals and the collection by us of a management fee for managing and operating on behalf of TransMontaigne Inc. certain tank capacity owned by a utility. In exchange, the amendment provides for an increase in throughput fees charged on light and heavy oil volumes at our Florida terminals. The impact on the statement of operations and cash flows is not expected to be

significant. We will continue to retain a loss allowance on product receipts at our Mobile and Midwest terminals.

        On October 3, 2006, we incurred a release of approximately $7.91,600 barrels of gasoline at our Rogers, Arkansas terminal facility due to human error. We currently estimate that we will incur unreimbursed environmental remediation costs and product losses of approximately $0.7 million.

On June 3, 2005,October 19, 2006, we closed on the exerciseannounced a distribution of the underwriters' over-allotment option to acquire an additional 502,500 common limited partner units at the initial public offering price of $21.40$0.43 per unit resulting in net proceedspayable on November 7, 2006 to unitholders of record on October 31, 2006.

        On December 29, 2006, we acquired from TransMontaigne Inc. the Brownsville and River terminals for a cash payment of approximately $10.0 million, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses of approximately $0.8$135 million. We repurchased 502,500 common units from Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc., a subsidiary of TransMontaigne Inc., at $20.01 per unit to satisfyfinanced the over-allotment option.acquisition through additional borrowings under our amended and restated senior secured credit facility.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 20, 2005,January 19, 2007, we announced the declaration of a cash distribution of $0.15$0.43 per unit payable on August 9, 2005February 7, 2007 to unitholders of record on July 29, 2005. That distribution representsJanuary 31, 2007.

        On March 2, 2007, the pro rata portioncompensation committee of the board of directors of our minimum quarterly cash distributiongeneral partner authorized the grant of $0.40 per unit for10,000 restricted phantom units, in the period from May 27, 2005 through June 30, 2005.

On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina caused severe damage alongaggregate, to the United States Gulf Coast and into the southeastern United States. We currentlydirectors of our general partner who are not awareofficers of any significant long-term damage to our facilities as a result of Hurricane Katrina.general partner or its affiliates. The grants will become effective on March 31, 2007.

32

NATURE OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES

We derive revenues from our refined product terminalsterminal and pipeline transportation operations by charging fees for providing integrated terminaling, transportation and related services. We generate revenues from the Razorback Pipeline by charging a tariff for transporting refined products. The fees we charge, our other sources of revenue and our direct operating costs and expenses are described below.

Throughput and additive injection fees.Additive Injection Fees, Net.    We earn throughput fees for each barrel of product that is distributed at our terminals by our customers. Terminal throughput fees are based on the volume of product distributed at the facility's truck loading racks, generally at a standard rate per barrel of product. We provide additive injection services in connection with the delivery of product at our terminals. These fees generally are based on the volume of product injected and delivered over the rack at our terminals.

Terminaling Storage Fees.    We provide storage capacity at our terminals to third parties, and prior to May 27, 2005, TransMontaigne Inc. Terminaling storage fees generally are based on a per barrel of storage capacity per month rate and vary with the duration of the agreement and the type of product.

Pipeline Transportation Fees.    We earn pipeline transportation fees at our Razorback Pipeline based on the volume of product transported and the distance from the origin point to the delivery point. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission regulates the tariff on the Razorback Pipeline is regulated by the FERC.Pipeline.

        Management Fees and Reimbursed Costs.    We manage and operate for a major oil company certain tank capacity at our Port Everglades (South) terminal and receive a reimbursement of costs. We also manage and operate for a foreign oil company a bi-directional products pipeline connected to our Brownsville, Texas terminal facility.

Other Revenue.    In addition to providing storage and distribution services at our terminal facilities, we also provide ancillary services including heating and mixing of stored products and product transfer services. We also recognize gains from the sale of product to TransMontaigne Inc. resulting from the excess of product deposited by our customers into our terminals over the amount of product that the customer is contractually permitted to withdraw from those terminals.

Direct Operating Costs and Expenses.    The direct operating costs and expenses of our operations include the directly related wages and employee benefits, utilities, communications, maintenance and repairs, property and casualty insurance, property taxes, rent, vehicle expenses, environmental compliance costs, materials and supplies.

        Direct General and Administrative Expenses.    The direct general and administrative expenses of our operations include costs related to operating as a separate public entity, such as accounting and legal costs associated with annual and quarterly reports and tax return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution, independent director fees and amortization of deferred equity-based compensation.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

A summary of the significant accounting policies that we have adopted and followed in the preparation of our historical consolidated financial statements is detailed in Note 1 of Notes to consolidated financial statements. Certain of these accounting policies require the use of estimates. We have identified the following estimates that, in our opinion, are subjective in nature, require the exercise of judgment, and involve complex analysis.analyses. These estimates are based on our knowledge and understanding of current conditions and actions that we may take in the future. Changes in these estimates will occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events. Subsequent changes in these estimates may have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.    At June 30, 2005,December 31, 2006, our allowance for doubtful accounts was $nil.$75,000. Our allowance for doubtful accounts represents the amount of trade receivables that we do not expect to collect. The valuation of our allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our analysis of specific

33

individual customer balances that are past due and, from that analysis, we estimate the amount of the receivable balance that we do not expect to collect. That estimate is based on various factors, including our experience in collecting past due amounts from the customer being evaluated, the customer's current financial condition, the current economic environment and the economic outlook for the future.

Accrued Environmental Obligations.    At June 30, 2005, we were not aware of any existing conditions that may cause us to incur significant expenditures in the future for the remediation of potentially contaminated sites caused by past operations. As such,December 31, 2006, we have not reflected inan accrued liability of $682,000 as our best estimate of the accompanying consolidated financial statements any liabilitiesundiscounted future payments we expect to pay for environmental obligationscosts to be incurred in the future based onremediate existing conditions. Estimates of our environmental obligations are subject to change due to a number of factors and judgments involved in the estimation process, including the early stage of investigation at certain sites, the lengthy time frames required to complete remediation, technology changes affecting remediation methods, alternative remediation methods and strategies, and changes in environmental laws and regulations. Changes in our estimates and assumptions may occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events.

Costs incurred to remediate existing contamination at the Florida terminals historically owned bywe acquired from TransMontaigne Inc. have been, and are expected in the future to be, insignificant. As part of the omnibus agreement, TransMontaigne Inc. retained 100% of these liabilities. TransMontaigne Inc. hasliabilities and indemnified us through May 2010 against certain potential environmental claims, losses and expenses associated with the operation of the initially-contributed assetsacquired terminal facilities and occurring before May 27, 2005,the date of acquisition, up to a maximum liability (not to exceed $15 million for the Florida and Midwest terminals acquired on May 27, 2005, not to exceed $2.5 million for the Mobile, Alabama terminal acquired on January 1, 2006, and not to exceed $15 million for the Brownsville and River terminals acquired on December 29, 2006) for this indemnification obligation (see Note 2 of Notes to consolidated financial statements).

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006, SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 2004 AND 20032004

In reviewing our historical results of operations, you should be aware that the historicalaccompanying consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of certain TransMontaigne Inc. terminal and pipeline transportation operations prior to their acquisition by us from TransMontaigne Inc. The results of operations of TransMontaigne Inc.'s terminals and pipelines prior to being acquired by us are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as being attributable to TransMontaigne Inc. ("Predecessor"). The acquired assets and liabilities have been recorded at TransMontaigne Inc.'s carryover basis. At the closing of our initial public offering on May 27, 2005, reflectwe acquired from TransMontaigne Inc. seven Florida terminals, including terminals located in Tampa, Port Manatee, Fisher Island, Port Everglades (North), Port Everglades (South), Cape Canaveral, and Jacksonville; and the financial resultsRazorback Pipeline system, including the terminals located at Mt. Vernon, Missouri and Rogers, Arkansas in exchange for 120,000 common units, 2,872,266 subordinated units, a 2% general partner interest and a cash payment of our predecessor entity "TransMontaigne Partners (Predecessor)."approximately $111.5 million. On January 1, 2006, we acquired from TransMontaigne Inc. the Mobile, Alabama terminal in exchange for a cash payment of approximately $17.9 million. On December 29, 2006, we acquired from TransMontaigne Inc. the Brownsville, Texas terminal, 12 terminals along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers ("River terminals") and the Baton Rouge, Louisiana dock facility in exchange for a cash payment of approximately $135 million. The contributionacquisitions of certain TransMontaigne Inc. terminal and pipeline operations to us was recordedfrom TransMontaigne Inc. have been accounted for financial reporting purposes at carryover basis in a manner similar to a reorganization ofas transactions among entities under common control. In reviewing these results you should be awarecontrol and, accordingly, prior periods include the activity of the following:

The historical revenues include only actual amounts received from:

–>

third parties who utilized our Florida terminals;acquired terminal and

–>

pipeline operations since the date they were purchased by TransMontaigne Inc. for useacquisitions made by us prior to September 1, 2006, and since September 1, 2006 (the date of our Razorback Pipeline systemMorgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.'s acquisition of TransMontaigne Inc.) for acquisitions made by us on or after September 1, 2006. On February 28, 2003, TransMontaigne Inc. purchased the Port Manatee, Fisher Island, Port Everglades (North), Cape Canaveral and Florida terminals.

In addition, the        The historical results of operations reflect the impact of the following acquisitions:

–>•

the purchase of the Brownsville terminal, River terminals and the Baton Rouge, Louisiana dock facility by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, completed in September 2006 when it acquired TransMontaigne Inc., and subsequent acquisition by us from TransMontaigne Inc. in December 2006;



•

the acquisition of the Oklahoma City terminal by us, completed in October 2005;



•

the purchase of the Mobile, Alabama terminal by TransMontaigne Inc., completed in August 2005, and subsequent acquisition by us from TransMontaigne Inc. in January 2006;



•

the purchase of five of the Florida terminals contributed to us with aggregate storage capacity of approximately 4.8 million barrels,by TransMontaigne Inc., completed in February 2003;2003, and subsequent acquisition by us from TransMontaigne Inc. in May 2005; and



–>•

the purchase of the remaining 40% interest in the Razorback Pipeline by TransMontaigne Inc., completed in June 2002.2002, and subsequent acquisition by us from TransMontaigne Inc. in May 2005.

We reported net earnings of approximately $10.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2005, compared to net earnings of approximately $10.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2004, and net earnings of approximately $4.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.        Selected results of operations data for

34

each of the quarters in the three-yearyear ended December 31, 2006, six months ended December 31, 2005 and the two-year period ended June 30, 2005, are summarized below (in thousands):

35