QuickLinks-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x 

ý


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR

¨

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period fromto

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number 1-3932

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
38-1490038
(State of Incorporation) 38-1490038
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2000 North M-63, Benton Harbor, Michigan
49022-2692
(Address of principal executive offices)
 

49022-2692
(Zip Code)

Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code(269) 923-5000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class


Name of each exchange on which registered


Common stock, par value $1.00 per share

 Chicago Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange

Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

 Chicago Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange

73/4% Debentures due 2016

 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1933. Yesýx Noo¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act.Act of 1934. Yeso¨Noýx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ýx Noo¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.ý¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, or an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of "accelerated“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and large accelerated filer"“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act. (check(Check one)
Large Accelerated Filer    ý                    Accelerated Filer    o                    Non-Accelerated Filer    o

        Large Accelerated FilerxAccelerated Filer ¨
        Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller Reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes o¨Noýx

The aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by stockholders not including voting stock held by directors and executive officers of the registrant and certain employee plans of the registrant (the exclusion of such shares shall not be deemed an admission by the registrant that any such person is an affiliate of the registrant) at the close of business on June 30, 200529, 2007 (the last business day of the registrant'sregistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $4,561,751,600.$8,555,382,037.

On February 22, 2006,15, 2008, the registrant had 68,035,71675,830,968 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the following documents are incorporated herein by reference into the Part of the Form 10-K indicated:

Document


Part of Form 10-K into

which incorporated


The registrant'sregistrant’s proxy statement for the 20062008 annual meeting of
stockholders (the "Proxy Statement"“Proxy Statement”)

 Part III


PART I


PART I

ITEM 11..Business.

Whirlpool Corporation, athe world’s leading global manufacturer and marketer of major home appliances, was incorporated in 1955 under the laws of Delaware as the successor to a business that traces its origin to 1898. The CompanyWhirlpool manufactures products in 12 countries under nine13 principal brand names and markets products to distributorsin nearly every country around the world. Whirlpool’s geographic segments consist of North America, Europe, Latin America, and retailers in more than 170 countries.Asia. As of December 31, 2005, the Company2007, we had approximately 66,00073,000 employees.

As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires, the terms "Company"“Whirlpool,” “we,” “us,” and "Whirlpool" include“our” refer to Whirlpool Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Products and Markets

        The CompanyWhirlpool manufactures and markets a full line of major appliances and related products, primarily for home use. The Company'sOur principal products are laundry appliances, refrigerators, and freezers, cooking appliances, dishwashers, room air-conditioning equipment, and mixers and other small household appliances. The CompanyWe also producesproduce hermetic compressors for refrigeration systems.

        The following table sets forth information regarding the total net sales contributed byFor each class of similar products which accounted for 10% or more of the Company'sour consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004, and 2003.over the last three years, the following table lists the total net sales of each class.

 
  
 Year ended December 31 (millions of dollars)
Class of Similar Products

 Percent in
2005

 2005
 2004
 2003

Home Laundry Appliances

 

31

%

$

4,425

 

$

4,070

 

$

3,856

Home Refrigerators and Freezers

 

32

%

$

4,506

 

$

3,879

 

$

3,465

Home Cooking Appliances

 

15

%

$

2,186

 

$

2,021

 

$

1,903

Other

 

22

%

$

3,200

 

$

3,250

 

$

2,952
  
 
 
 

Net Sales

 

100

%

$

14,317

 

$

13,220

 

$

12,176
  
 
 
 

   Percent in
2007
  Year ended December 31 (millions of dollars)

Class of Similar Products

    2007    2006    2005

Home Laundry Appliances

  29%  $5,678    $5,474    $4,425

Home Refrigerators and Freezers

  30%   5,833     5,341     4,506

Home Cooking Appliances

  15%   2,995     2,909     2,186

Other

  26%   4,902     4,356     3,200
                   

Net Sales

  100%  $19,408    $18,080    $14,317
                   

In North America, the CompanyWhirlpool markets and distributes major home appliances and portable appliances under a variety of brand names. In the United States, the Company marketswe market and distributesdistribute products under theWhirlpool,Maytag,KitchenAid,Jenn-Air,Roper,Estate,Admiral,Magic Chef,Amana, andInglis brand names primarily to retailers, distributors, and builders.KitchenAid portable appliances, such as mixers, are sold directly to retailers. Major In Canada, we market and distribute major home appliances are marketed in Canada under theInglis,Admiral,Speed Queen,Whirlpool,Maytag,Jenn-Air,Magic Chef,Amana,Roper, Estate, andKitchenAid brand names. In Mexico, we market and distribute major home appliances are marketed under theWhirlpool,Maytag,Jenn-Air,Acros,KitchenAid,Estate,Roper and,Supermatic, Amana,and Admiralbrand names. SomeWe sell some products are sold by the Company to other manufacturers, distributors, and retailers for resale in North America under those manufacturers'manufacturers’ and retailers'retailers’ respective brand names. The Company hasWe have manufacturing facilities in the United States and Mexico.

        The CompanyWhirlpool is a major supplier to Sears of laundry, refrigerator, dishwasher, and trash compactor home appliances. SomeSears markets some of the products that the Company supplieswe supply to Sears are marketed by Searsthem under Sears'itsKenmore brand name. Sears is also a major outlet for the Company'sourWhirlpool and,Maytag,KitchenAid, Jenn-Air,and Amanabrand products. In 2005,2007, approximately 16%12% of the Company'sour consolidated net sales were attributable to sales to Sears.

In Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s European region, the Company marketswe market and distributes itsdistribute our major home appliances under theWhirlpool,Maytag,Amana,Bauknecht,Ignis,Laden, andPolar brand names, and itsmajor and portable appliances under theKitchenAid brand name. In addition to itsour extensive operations in Western Europe, the Company haswe have sales



subsidiaries in Russia, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Croatia, and Morocco, and Turkey, with representative offices in Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Slovenia, Serbia and Slovenia. The CompanyMontenegro. Whirlpool markets a full line of products under theWhirlpool,KIC,, andIgnis brand names in South

Africa. Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s European operations also sell products carrying theWhirlpool,Bauknecht,, andIgnis brand names to distributors and dealers in Africa and the Middle East. The CompanyWhirlpool has manufacturing facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, and Sweden.

In Latin America, the Company marketswe market and distributes itsdistribute our major home appliances through regional networks under theWhirlpool,Maytag,KitchenAid,Brastemp,Consul, andEslabon de Lujo brand names. ApplianceWe manage appliance sales and distribution in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Chile are managed by the Company'sPeru through our Brazilian subsidiary, and in Bolivia, Peru, Paraguay, and Uruguay through our distributors. ApplianceWe manage appliance sales and distribution in Central American countries, the Caribbean, Venezuela, Colombia, Guatemala, and Ecuador are managed by Whirlpool's North America regionthrough our Brazilian subsidiary and through distributors. In Latin America, the CompanyWhirlpool has manufacturing facilities in Brazil.

In Asia, the Company haswe have organized the marketing and distribution of itsour major home appliances into fourfive operating groups: (1) Greater China, which includes mainland China,China; (2) Hong Kong and Taiwan; (2) South Asia,(3) India, which includes India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Nepal; (3)Pakistan; (4) Oceania, which includes Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Islands; and (4)(5) Southeast Asia, which includes Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Korea, and Japan. The Company marketsWe market and sells itssell our products in Asia under theWhirlpool,Maytag,KitchenAid,BauknechtAmana,, andIgnisJenn-Airbrand names by a combination of direct sales to appliance retailers and chain stores and through full-service distributors to a large network of retail stores. In Asia, the Company haswe have manufacturing facilities in China and India.

Competition

Competition in the home appliance industry is intense. In addition to traditional competitors such as Electrolux, GE, Kenmore, and Maytag,Kenmore, there are new and expanding foreign competitors such as LG, Bosch Siemens, Samsung, Fisher & Paykel, and Haier. Moreover, the U.S. customer base is characterized by large, sophisticated trade customers who have many choices and demand competitive products, services, and prices. In most major markets throughout the world, 20052007 was a challenging year for the industry with continued unprecedented rising costs in the areas of steel and other metals, oil basedoil-based materials, such as resins, and transportation. Competition in the Company'sour markets is based upon a wide variety of factors, including principally, cost, selling price, distribution, performance, innovation, product features, quality, and other financial incentives. These financial incentives (such asinclude cooperative advertising, co-marketing funds, sales person incentives, volume rebates, and terms), performance, innovation, product features, and quality. The Company believesterms. We believe that itwe can best compete in the current environment by increasing productivity, improving quality, lowering costs, focusing on research and development including introducing innovative new products through innovation, building strong brands, enhancing trade customer and consumer value with itsour product offerings, continuing to expand itsour global footprint, expanding trade distribution channels, and where appropriate, taking other efficiency-enhancing measures.

        In addition, on August 22, 2005, as discussed below, Whirlpool entered into an agreement to acquire Maytag Corporation ("Maytag"), for which regulatory approval is pending. Whirlpool believes that its combination with Maytag will enhance its ability to respond to these competitive conditions, and will benefit trade customers and consumers of the combined company by generating significant cost savings that will enable it to continue to offer competitive prices across a wide array of products as well as increased quality and innovation.

Other Information

        The CompanyWhirlpool is generally not dependent upon any one source for raw materials or purchased components essential to its business. In those areas where a single supplier is used, alternative sources are generally available and can be developed within the normal manufacturing environment, although someenvironment. Some unanticipated costs may be incurred in transitioning to a new supplier whereif a prior single supplier is



relationship was abruptly interrupted or terminated. While there haveThere has been continued significant cost pressurespressure in some areas, such as metals and oil basedoil-based materials, and significant demand for certain components, the Company believescomponents. We believe such raw materials and components will be available in adequate quantities to meet anticipated production schedules.

        PatentsThe patents we presently owned by the Companyown are considered, in the aggregate, to be valuable to the Company. The Companyvaluable. Also, Whirlpool is the owner of a number of trademarks in the U.S. and foreign countries. The most important trademarks owned by the Companythat we own in North America areWhirlpool,Maytag,KitchenAid,Estate,Roper,Admiral,Amana,Jenn-Air, andAcros.Acros. The most important trademarks owned by the Companythat we own in Europe areWhirlpool,Bauknecht, andIgnis. In Latin America, the most important trademarks owned by the Companythat we own areWhirlpool,Brastemp, andConsul. The most important trademark owned by the Companythat

we own in Asia isWhirlpool. The Company also receivesWe receive royalties from licensing itsour trademarks to third parties to sell and service certain products bearing theWhirlpool, Maytag, KitchenAid, Jenn-Air, Admiral, Amana,andKitchenAid Magic Chefbrand names.

Expenditures for Company-sponsoredWhirlpool-sponsored research and development relating to new products and the improvement of existing products were approximately $421 million in 2007, $375 million in 2006, and $339 million in 2005, $315 million in 2004, and $285 million in 2003.2005.

        The Company'sOur manufacturing facilities are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect or enhance the environment, many of which require federal, state, or other governmental licenses and permits with regard to wastewater discharges, air emissions, and hazardous waste management. The Company'sOur policy is to comply with all such laws and regulations. Where laws and regulations are less restrictive, the Company haswe have established and isare following itsour own standards consistent with itsour commitment to environmental responsibility.

        The Company believesWe believe that it iswe are in compliance in all material respects with all presently applicable federal, state, local, and other governmental provisions relating to environmental protection in the countries in which it haswe have manufacturing operations. Compliance with these environmental laws and regulations has not had a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings, or the Company'sour competitive position. Capital expenditures and expenses for manufacturing operations directly attributable to compliance with these environmental provisions worldwide amounted to approximately $28 million in 2005,2007, $33 million in 2006, and $28 million in 2004, and $26 million in 2003. It is estimated2005. We estimate that in 2006,2008, environmental capital expenditures and expenses for manufacturing operations will be approximately $27$29 million. Capital expenditures and expenses for product related environmental activities were not material in any of the past three years and are not expected to be material in 2006.2008.

        Globally, theThe entire major home appliance industry, including the Company,Whirlpool, must contend with the adoption of stricter governmental energy and environmental standards. These standards towill be phased in over the next several years. Theseyears and include the general phase-out of ozone depleting chemicals used in refrigeration, and energy standards rulemakings for other selected major appliances, producedregulatory restrictions on the materials content specified for use in our products by some jurisdictions, and mandated recycling of our products at the Company.end of their useful lives. Compliance with these various standards, as they become effective, will require some product redesign. However, the Company believes,we believe, based on itsour understanding of the current state of proposed regulations, that it shouldwe will be able to develop, manufacture, and market products that comply with these regulations. Additionally, on February 13, 2003, the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive ("WEEE") was published in Europe. Among other provisions, WEEE stipulates that "producers" be responsible for the cost of collection, disposal, and recycling of waste for many electrical and electronic products as of August 13, 2005. For more information on WEEE, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.

        The Company has been notified by stateState and federal environmental protection agencies have notified us of itsour possible involvement in a number of "Superfund"“Superfund” sites in the United States. However, based upon our evaluation of the facts and circumstances relating to these sites byalong with the Company and itsevaluation of our technical consultants, the Company doeswe do not presently anticipate any material adverse effect upon the Company'sour earnings, financial condition,



or competitive position arising out of the resolution of these matters or the resolution of any other known governmental proceeding regarding environmental protection matters.

For information about the challenges and risks associated with the Company'sour foreign operations, see "Risks“Risks Relating to our Business"Business” under Item 1A below.

For certain other financial information concerning the Company'sour business segments and foreign and domestic operations, see Notes 1 andNote 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.

For information on the Company'sour global restructuring plans, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.

        For information on product recalls, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.


Pending Maytag Acquisition

        On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool entered into a definitive merger agreement with MaytagFor information on product recalls, see Note 8 to acquire all outstanding shares of Maytag common stock. The aggregate transaction value, including the payment to Maytag stockholders of approximately $850 million in cash and between 9.2 million and 11.3 million shares of Whirlpool common stock and assumption of approximately $972 million of Maytag debt (based on Maytag stock, exercisable stock options, and debt reported outstanding as of December 31, 2005), is approximately $2.7 billion. The number of shares of Whirlpool common stock to be issued will depend on the volume weighted average trading prices of Whirlpool common stock during a twenty trading day period ending shortly before completion of the merger. The transaction was approved by Maytag shareholders on December 22, 2005 and is pending regulatory clearance as discussed below.

        Whirlpool has sufficient resources to finance the acquisition. The acquisition and upcoming debt maturities of the combined company are expected to be financed initially through commercial paper supported by existing bank agreements and with new committed bank facilities as discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis"Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.

Maytag Acquisition

On March 31, 2006, we completed our acquisition of Maytag. The Company expects to eventually refinance a portion of its commercial paper in the capital markets.

        Whirlpool currently expects the merger withaggregate purchase price for Maytag to generatewas approximately $300 million to $400$1.9 billion, including approximately $848 million of annual pre-taxcash and approximately 9.7 million shares of Whirlpool common stock. Maytag had consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005, of approximately $4.9 billion. With the acquisition, Whirlpool added an array of home appliance brands includingMaytag, Jenn-Air, Admiral, Magic Chef,andAmana. We are realizing cost savings by the third year following completion of the merger. Efficiencies are expected to come from all areas across the value chain including product manufacturing and marketing, global procurement, logistics, infrastructure and support areas. Achieving these efficiencies will require one-time costsareas, product research and capital investments currently estimated to be indevelopment, and asset utilization. In 2007, we completed the rangesale of $350 million to $500 million, a majority ofall Maytag adjacent businesses which currently are anticipated to be capitalized or accrued in purchase accounting. Whirlpool currently anticipates incurring these costs during the first two years following completionwere not part of the merger.core appliance business.

        The merger is subject to clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, and other customary closing conditions. On December 1, 2005, Whirlpool and Maytag announced that they had certified substantial compliance with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in response to a request for additional information ("second request") and had agreed not to close the proposed merger before February 27, 2006, without the Antitrust Division's concurrence, recognizing that the Antitrust Division could request additional time for review. On February 13, 2006, Whirlpool and Maytag announced that they agreed with the Antitrust Division to a limited extension of time to complete the review of the proposed merger. The companies have agreed not to close the transaction before March 30, 2006 without the Antitrust Division's concurrence.

        Whirlpool and Maytag are working closely with the Department of Justice and continue to cooperate fully with its investigation and respond promptly to its inquiries.

        On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool paid Maytag $40 million to reimburse Maytag for its payment of a fee to terminate its prior merger agreement with Triton Acquisition Holding Co. Whirlpool has agreed to pay up to $15 million to assist Maytag in retaining key employees while the merger is pending. Whirlpool also has agreed to pay Maytag a "reverse break-up fee" of $120 million under certain circumstances if the transaction cannot be closed due to an inability to obtain regulatory clearance.


Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the Company'sour executive officers on January 1, 2006,February 15, 2008, the positions and offices with the Companythey held by them on suchthat date, and the year they first became executive officers, and their ages on January 1, 2006:officers:

Name

 Office
 First Became
an Executive
Officer

 Age

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Jeff M. Fettig Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 1994 48

David L. Swift

 

Director and President, Whirlpool North America

 

2001

 

47

Michael A. Todman

 

Director and President, Whirlpool International

 

2001

 

48

Marc R. Bitzer

 

Executive Vice President and President, Whirlpool Europe

 

2006

 

40

Mark K. Hu

 

Executive Vice President and President, Whirlpool Asia

 

2005

 

52

Paulo F. M. Periquito

 

Executive Vice President and President, Latin America

 

1997

 

59

Roy W. Templin

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

2004

 

45

Michael D. Thieneman

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer

 

1997

 

57

W. Timothy Yaggi

 

Executive Vice President, Market Operations, North America

 

2006

 

45

 

Name

  

Office

  First Became
an Executive
Officer
  Age

Jeff M. Fettig

  Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  1994  50

Michael A. Todman

  Director and President, Whirlpool North America  2001  50

Marc R. Bitzer

  Executive Vice President and President, Whirlpool Europe  2006  43

Paulo F. M. Periquito

  President, Whirlpool International  1997  61

Roy W. Templin

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  2004  47

Michael D. Thieneman

  Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer  1997  59

Each of the executive officers named above was elected to serve in the office indicated until the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of stockholders in 20062008 and until his successor is chosen and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal. Each of theour executive officers of the Company has held the position set forth in the table above or has served the CompanyWhirlpool in various executive or administrative capacities for at least the past five years, except for (a) Mr. Swift, who, prior to joining the Company in October 2001, for the previous 20 years held various executive or administrative positions with the Eastman Kodak Company (photographic equipment and supplies), the most recent being President, Kodak Professional Group, (b) Mr. Templin, who, prior to joining the CompanyWhirlpool in July 2003, for the previous 12 years held various financial and executive positions with Kimball International, Inc. (office furniture), the most recent being Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer, and (c) Mr. Hu, who, prior to joining the Company in January 2004, for the previous seven years held various executive or administrative positions with Philips Electronics N.V., the most recent being Senior Vice President and General Manager, Philips Lighting East Asia.Officer.

Available Information

Financial results and investor information (including Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s Form 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K reports) can be accessed through Whirlpool's websiteare accessible at Whirlpool’s website:www.whirlpoolcorp.com; click on the "Investors"“Investors” tab and then click on "SEC“SEC Filings." Copies of Whirlpool'sour Form 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K reports, as well as amendments to them, are available free of charge through Whirlpool'sour website on the same day they are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.



ITEM 1A.Risk Factors.

This report contains statements referring to Whirlpool that are not historical facts and are considered "forward-looking statements"“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which are intended to take advantage of the "safe harbor"“safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities

Litigation Reform Act of 1995, are based on current projections about operations, industry conditions, financial condition, liquidity, and the impact of the pending merger withacquisition of Maytag. Words that identify forward-looking statements include words such as "may," "will," "should," "plan," "predict," "potential," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend," "believe," "may“may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “predict,” “potential,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “may impact," "on” “on track," and words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance, thea merger, or our businesses, identify forward-looking statements.businesses. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Those statements are not guarantees and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely from these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Relating to Our Business

We face intense competition in the home appliance industry and failure to successfully compete may negatively affect our business and financial performance. Each of our business segments operates in a highly competitive business environment and faces intense competition from a growing number of competitors, including an increasing numbermany of foreign-based competitors, which have strong consumer brand equity. Several of these competitors, such as LG, Samsung, and Bosch Siemens, are large, well-established companies that rank among the Global Fortune 150 and have demonstrated a commitment to North America through competitive imports and North American production. The elementssuccess in the global market. Competition in the global market is based on a number of competition includefactors including performance, innovation, product features, quality, cost, selling price, distribution, and other financial incentives, (suchsuch as cooperative advertising, co-marketing funds, sales person incentives, volume rebates, and terms), performance, innovation, product features, and quality.terms. In particular, in the past, our competitors, especially global competitors with low-cost sources of supply outside the United States, have aggressively priced their products and/or introduced new products in order to increase market share. If we are unable to successfully compete in this highly competitive environment, our business and financial performance could be negatively affected.

The loss of or decline in sales to any of our key trade customers, includingwhich include Sears, Lowe's,Lowe’s, Home Depot, and Best Buy, could adversely affect our financial performance. We sell to a sophisticated customer base characterized by sophisticated andof powerful trade customers that have significant leverage as buyers over their suppliers. Most of our products are not sold through purchase orders and not through long-term contracts, which facilitates the trade customers'customers’ ability to change volume among suppliers to obtain competitive terms. As the trade customers continue to consolidate and become larger, our trade customers may seek to use their position to improve their profitability by various means, including through improved efficiency, lower pricing, and increased promotional programs. If we are unable to respond by meetingand meet their requirements, our profitability or volume growth could be negatively affected. We have been a principal supplier of home appliances to Sears for many years. In 2005,2007, approximately 16%12% of Whirlpool'sour consolidated net sales of $14$19 billion were attributable to sales to Sears. Although no other customercustomers accounted for greater than 10% of consolidated net sales in 2005,2007, other customers may account for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in future periods. It should also be noted Maytag has reported that in 2005, approximately 10% of Maytag's consolidated net sales were attributable to Sears and approximately 14% to Home Depot. The loss of, or decline in volume of, sales to Sears, Lowe's,Lowe’s, Home Depot, Best Buy or any other trade customers to which we sell a significant amount of products could adversely affect our financial performance. Additionally, any loss ofif these trade customers lose market share by any such trade customersthis loss could have a negativenegatively impact on our financial performance.

Our business could be adversely affected by changesChanges in economic conditions.Demand forconditions could adversely affect our products is generally affected by abusiness. A number of economic factors, including, but not limited to, gross domestic product,



consumer interest rates, consumer confidence, retail trends, housing starts, sales of existing homes, and the level of mortgage refinancing.refinancing, generally affect demand for our products. A decline in economic activity in the United States and any other markets in which we operate could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.operations.

Our financial performance could be adversely affected by anAn inability to effectively execute and manage our business objectives.objectives could adversely affect our financial performance. The highly competitive nature of our industry requires that we effectively execute and manage our business including our global operating platform initiative whichand our Maytag strategy. Our global operating

platform initiative aims to reduce costs, drive productivity and quality improvements, and accelerate our rate of innovation. Our Maytag strategy calls for us to create cost efficiencies through the integration of Maytag operations into legacy Whirlpool operations and to use our innovation pipeline to reinvigorate Maytag brands. Our inability to effectively control costs and drive productivity improvements could affect our profits. In addition, our failure to provide high-quality, innovative products could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our sales, whichsales. If we failed in this way, it could negatively affect our revenues and overall financial performance. Additionally, our success is dependent on anticipating changes in customer preferences and on successful new product and process development and product relaunches in response to such changes. Failure to execute our Maytag strategy may result in our inability to realize the full anticipated benefits of the merger. Our future results and our ability to maintain or improve our competitive position will depend on our capacity to gauge the direction of our key markets and upon our ability to successfully and timely identify, develop, manufacture, market, and sell new or improved products in these changing markets.

Fluctuations and volatility in the cost of raw materials and purchased components could adversely affect our profitsprofits.. The primary materials used to produce and manufacture our products are steel, oil, plastic resins, and base metals, such as aluminum, copper, zinc, and zinc.nickel. On a global and regional basis, the sources and prices of those materials and components are susceptible to significant price fluctuations due to supply/demand trends, transportation costs, government regulations and tariffs, changes in currency exchange rates, price controls, the economic climate, and other unforeseen circumstances. During 2005, our business incurredPrices for materials and oil related costs are expected to increase by approximately $530$350 million of higher materialin 2008, largely driven by increases in base metals, such as copper, aluminum, zinc and oil-related costs.nickel, as well as component parts and steel. Continued significant increases in these and other costs in the future could materially affect our profits.

Our global business performance could be affected by theThe ability of suppliers to deliver parts, components and manufacturing equipment to our manufacturing facilities.facilities, including our ability to manufacture without disruption, could affect our global business performance. We use a wide range of materials and components in the global production of our products and use numerous suppliers to provide materials and components. We generally do not have guaranteed supply arrangements with our suppliers and some key parts may be available only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. OperationsOur operations and operations at suppliers'suppliers’ facilities are subject to disruption for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, work stoppages, fire, earthquake, flooding, or other natural disasters. Such disruption could interrupt our ability to manufacture certain products. Any significant disruption could negatively impact our revenue and earnings performance.

Our financialability to attract, develop and retain executives and other qualified employees is crucial to our results of operations and future growth. We depend upon the continued services and performance of our key executives, senior management and skilled personnel, particularly our professionals with experience in our business and operations and the home appliance industry. We cannot be sure that any of these individuals will continue to be employed by us. A lengthy period of time is required to hire and develop replacement personnel when skilled personnel depart Whirlpool. An inability to hire, develop and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could be adversely affectedmaterially hinder our business by, significantfor example, delaying our ability to bring new products to market or impairing the success of our operations.

Significant differences between actual results and estimates of the amount of future funding for our pension plans and post-retirementpostretirement health care benefit programs, and significant changes in funding assumptions or significant increases in funding obligations if pending U.S. pension reform legislation is adopted.due to regulatory changes, could adversely affect our financial results. We have both funded and unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially allmost of our North American employees and certain foreign employees. We also have unfunded post-retirementpostretirement health care benefit plans for eligible retired employees. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governs the funding obligations for our U.S. pension plans, which are our principal pension plans. Our U.S. defined benefit plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Actwere frozen as of 1974 (ERISA).December 31, 2006 for substantially all participants. For 2007 and beyond, Whirlpool employees may participate in an enhanced defined contribution plan.

As of December 31, 2005,2007, our projected benefit obligations under our pension plans and post-retirementpostretirement health care benefit programs exceeded the fair value of plan assets by an aggregate of approximately $1.28$1.9 billion ($576730 million of which was attributable to pension plans and $701 million$1.15 billion of which was attributable to post-retirementpostretirement health care benefits). Estimates for the amount and timing of the future funding obligations of these pension plans and post-retirementpostretirement health care benefit plans are based on various assumptions. These assumptions include among others, the discount rates, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, and health care cost trend rates. These assumptions are subject to change based on interest rates on high quality bonds, stock and bond market returns, and medical assets and health care cost trend rates.



Significant differences in results or significant changes in assumptions may materially affect our post-retirementpostretirement obligations and related future expense.

        Pension reform legislation is pending in Congress including, among other things, proposals for new funding targets, changes to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premiums, and restrictions on nonqualified benefit payments to certain employees in situations where the plan fails to meet certain minimum funding thresholds. If any of these legislative proposals are enacted into law, our funding obligations to the U.S. pension plans could be increased, which could adversely affect our financial results.

        It should be noted that as of December 31, 2005, Maytag's reported projected benefit obligations under its pension plans and post-retirement health care benefit programs exceeded the fair value of plan assets by an aggregate of approximately $1.33 billion ($580 million of which was attributable to pension plans and $751 million to post-retirement health care programs).

We may be adversely affected by environmental,Environmental and health and safety laws and regulations.regulations may adversely affect Whirlpool. We are subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety. We incur and will continue to incur capital and other expenditures to comply with these regulations. Complying with recently passed and enacted regulations in Europe such as the WEEE directive may increase ourThese types of costs and adversely affect our ability to sell certain products in Europe, which could negatively affect our financial performance. Additionally, we could be subjected to future liabilities, fines or penalties or the suspension of product production for failing to comply with environmental regulations. If cleanupCleanup obligations that might arise at any of our manufacturing sites or ifthe imposition of more stringent environmental laws are imposed in the future we could be adversely affected.affect us.

WeLitigation may be adversely affected by product liability claims.affect us.We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of any of our products results in personal injury or property damage. In the event that any of our products proves to be defective, we may be requiredneed to recall or redesign such products. There can be no assuranceguarantee that our insurance coverage against certain product liability claims will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that such coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred.we incur. We also face certain class action litigation regarding allegedly defective products that areinsurance does not covered by insurance.cover. A successful claim in excess of, or outside of, our available insurance coverage may have a material adverse effect on our financial performance. In addition, any claim or product recall that results in significant adverse publicity may also negatively affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

        Lastly, we are currently investigating a supplier-related quality and potential product safety problem that may affect up to 3.5 million appliances manufactured between 2000 and 2002. We currently estimate that the potential cost from this matter could be in the range of $0 to $235 million, depending on numerous factors, such as whether some or all of the appliances must be repaired or replaced, whether the supplier will bear the cost of any corrective action, whether we will initially bear the cost of any corrective action, and if we initially bear the cost of any corrective action, whether we will be successful in recovering those costs from the supplier at a later date. In addition, we could incur other costs arising out of this matter, which cannot currently be estimated but could be material.

Our global business could be negatively impacted by aA deterioration in labor relations.relations could negatively impact our global business. As of December 31, 2005,2007, we had approximately 66,00073,000 employees. Of those employees, approximately 60% are represented by various labor unions with separate collective bargaining agreements.agreements represent approximately 60%. Our current collective bargaining agreements generally have three year terms. Due to the large number of collective bargaining agreements, we are periodically in negotiations with certain of the unions representing our employees. We cannot be assured that at some point we will not be subject to employee work stoppages by some of our employees and, if such events were to occur, that there would not be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Further, we cannot be assured that we will be able to renew the various collective bargaining agreements on the same or similar terms, or at all, which could also affect our business, financial condition, or results of operation.operations.



Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services, and brands. We consider our intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and licensing agreements, to be a significant and valuable aspect of our business. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements and third party nondisclosure and assignment agreements. Our failure to obtain or adequately protect our trademarks, products, new features of our products, or our processes may diminish our competitiveness.

We have applied for patent protection in the United States and other jurisdictions with respect to certain innovativeinnovations and new products, product features, and processes. We cannot be assured that any of our patent applications will be approved by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or any other jurisdiction.jurisdiction will approve any of our patent applications. Additionally, the patents we own could be challenged, invalidated, or designedothers could design around by othersour patents and the patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with any meaningful protection or commercial advantage. Further, the laws of certain foreign countries in which we do business or contemplate doing business in the future do not

recognize intellectual property rights or protect them to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.States law. As a result, these factors could weaken our competitive advantage with respect to our products, services, and brands could be reduced in foreign jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our financial performance.

Moreover, while we do not believe that any of our products infringe the valid intellectual property rights of third parties, weothers may be unaware ofassert intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of our technology, brands, products, or services. Any litigation regarding patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations. Claims of intellectual property infringement might also require us to enter into costly license agreements. We also may be subject to significant damages or injunctions against development and sale of certain products.

Foreign currency fluctuations may affect our financial performance.We generate a significant portion of our revenue and incur a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The value of our revenue, earnings and cash flows from our foreign operations are affected by changesChanges in the functional currencies of those operations affect the value of our revenue and earnings from our foreign operations. We use currency forwards and options to manage our foreign currency transaction exposures but do not directly hedge our exposure on translation of reported earnings. As a result, weexposures. We cannot completely eliminate our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, which may adversely affect our financial performance. In addition, because our consolidated financial results are reported in dollars, if we generate sales or earnings in other currencies the translation of those results into dollars can result in a significant increase or decrease in the amount of those sales or earnings.

If we cannot manage the additional challenges presented byof our international operations, our financial performance may suffer. For the year ended December 31, 2005,2007, we derived approximately 40% of our net sales from outside of North America (which includes Canada and Mexico), including 14%20% in Europe, 18% in Latin America, 3%and 2% in Asia, and 22% in Europe.Asia. We expect that international sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of our net sales in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, we face numerous risks associated with conducting international operations, any of which could negatively affect our financial performance. These risks include the following:

    Changes

    changes in foreign country regulatory requirements;

    Various

    various import/export restrictions and the availability of required import/export licenses;

    Imposition

    imposition of foreign tariffs and other trade barriers;

    Political,

    political, legal, and economic instability;

    Foreign

    foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;

    Inflation;


inflation;

      Work

      work stoppages and disruptions in the shipping of imported and exported products;

      Government

      government price controls;

      Extended

      extended payment terms and the ability to collect accounts receivable; and

      The

      the ability to repatriate cash.

    Additionally, we are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage to foreign companies that are not subject to similar regulations.

    Terrorist attacks, armed conflicts, natural disasters, and epidemics could affect our domestic and international sales, disrupt our supply chain, and impair our ability to produce and deliver our products. Such events could directly impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or customers, both in the United States and elsewhere.

    Risks Relating to the Pending Maytag Acquisition

    Our inability to complete the merger for regulatory or other reasons, or our inability to close the transaction in a timely manner, could adversely affect our financial performance. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is reviewing the proposed merger and we cannot be assured that the proposed merger will obtain regulatory clearance or that the other conditions to closing will be satisfied. We currently expect the merger with Maytag will enhance our ability to compete by generating approximately $300 to $400 million of annual pre-tax savings by the third year following completion of the merger. Failure to close the merger would prevent us from realizing the expected synergies and would also subject us to substantial additional costs. In connection with the transaction, Whirlpool has paid $40 million to reimburse Maytag for its payment of a fee to terminate its prior agreement with Triton Acquisition Holding Co. and has agreed to pay Maytag up to $15 million to assist Maytag in retaining key employees while the merger is pending (irrespective of whether the merger occurs), as well as a "reverse break-up fee" of $120 million under certain circumstances if the transaction cannot be closed due to an inability to obtain regulatory clearance. In addition, Whirlpool has and will incur other significant transaction-related costs.

    Maytag is subject to business uncertainties while the merger is pending which may subsequently adversely affect our business after the merger is completed. Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on Maytag and consequently on us once the transaction is completed. These uncertainties may impair Maytag's ability to retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed, and could cause customers and others that deal with Maytag to defer purchases or other decisions concerning Maytag, or to seek to change existing business relationships with Maytag. If key employees depart because of uncertainty about their future roles and the potential complexities of integration, we could be harmed following completion of the merger.

    Whirlpool may be unable to successfully integrate the businesses of Maytag in a timely manner which may affect our ability to realize the full anticipated benefits of the merger. The merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. As with every merger, there are potential difficulties of combining the companies' businesses. These may include the integration of Maytag's sales and marketing, distribution, manufacturing, engineering, finance, and administrative operations, both domestic and international, with and into our operations. Our process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of the combined company's businesses and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the merger and the integration of the two companies' operations of these businesses could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects after the merger.



            We expect certain efficiencies to arise from the merger, generating certain cost savings, and expect that achieving these efficiencies will require one-time costs and capital investment currently estimated to be in the range of $350 million to $500 million. Achievement of these benefits will depend in part upon how and when our business is integrated with Maytag and whether there are any additional costs incurred in connection with the integration. If the anticipated benefits are not realized fully or in a timely manner, or if there are significant additional costs, our financial results could be adversely affected.


    ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

    None.


    ITEM 2.Properties.

            The Company'sOur principal executive offices are located in Benton Harbor, Michigan. On December 31, 2005, the Company's2007, our principal manufacturing operations were carried on at 4044 locations worldwide, 3031 of which are located in 11 countries outside the United States, primarily in the European region, and to a lesser extent in Asia, Latin America, and Mexico. The CompanyWhirlpool occupied a total of approximately 51.774.1 million square feet devoted to manufacturing, service, administrative offices, warehouse, distribution, and sales space. Over 21.137.8 million square feet of such space is occupied under lease. In general, all facilities are well maintained, suitably equipped, and in good operating condition.


    ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings.

    Information with respect to legal proceedings can be found under the heading "Legal Contingencies" in Note 78 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.


    ITEM 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

    There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders in the fourth quarter of 2005.2007.


    PART II

    ITEM 5.Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

            The Company'sWhirlpool’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Chicago Stock Exchange. As of February 22, 2006,15, 2008, the number of holders of record of the Company'sWhirlpool common stock was approximately 7,438.14,899.

    High, low, and lowclosing sales prices (as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape) for the Company'sWhirlpool’s common stock for each quarter during the years 20052007 and 20042006 are set forth below:

    Market Price

     High
     Low
     Close
    4Q 2005 $86.52 $67.89 $83.76
    3Q 2005 $85.70 $69.01 $75.77
    2Q 2005 $74.05 $60.78 $70.11
    1Q 2005 $71.25 $61.53 $67.73

    4Q 2004

     

    $

    69.77

     

    $

    54.53

     

    $

    69.21
    3Q 2004 $68.88 $58.15 $60.09
    2Q 2004 $70.98 $61.05 $68.60
    1Q 2004 $80.00 $66.60 $68.87

     

    Market Price

      High  Low  Close

    4Q2007

      $94.89  $72.15  $81.63

    3Q2007

      $116.79  $72.10  $89.10

    2Q2007

      $118.00  $84.17  $111.20

    1Q2007

      $96.77  $83.21  $84.91

    4Q2006

      $90.68  $80.80  $83.02

    3Q2006

      $89.64  $74.07  $84.11

    2Q2006

      $94.12  $78.12  $82.65

    1Q2006

      $96.00  $79.75  $91.47

    Cash dividends declared on the Company'sWhirlpool common stock for each quarter during the years 20052007 and 20042006 are set forth in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.

            There were no repurchasesThe following chart reflects the purchases of CompanyWhirlpool common stock by the Company or any affiliated purchaserWhirlpool in the fourth quarter of 2005.2007. These purchases were made pursuant to a publicly announced share repurchase program authorized by Whirlpool’s Board of Directors on June 15, 2004 to repurchase up to $500 million of Whirlpool common stock.

    Fiscal period (based on Trade date)

     Total Number
    of Shares
    Purchased
     Average Price
    Paid per Share
     Total Number of
    Shares Purchased as
    Part of Publicly
    Announced Plans or
    Programs
     Approximate Dollar
    Value of Shares that
    May Yet Be
    Purchased Under the
    Plan

    October 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007

      $ $ $214 million

    November 1, 2007 through November 30, 2007

     940,500 $77.30  940,500 $141 million

    December 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007

     525,500 $84.08  525,500 $97 million
           

    Total

     1,466,000 $79.73  1,466,000 


    ITEM 6.Selected Financial Data.

    The selected financial data for the five years ended December 31, 20052007 with respect to the following line items are shown under the "Eleven“Five Year Consolidated Statistical Review"Selected Financial Data” contained in the Financial Supplement to this report: Totaltotal net sales, earnings from continuing operations, earnings from continuing operations per share of common stock, dividends declared per share of common stock, total assets, and long-term debt. See the material incorporated herein by reference in response to Item 7 of this report for a discussion of the effects on such data of business combinations and other acquisitions, disposition and restructuring activity, restructuring costs, accounting changes, earnings of foreign affiliates, and other significant activity impacting or affecting the comparability of reported amounts.


    ITEM 7.Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

    See "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.


    ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

    Information with respect to market risk can be found under the caption "Market Risk"“Market Risk” in "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” contained in the Financial Supplement to this report.


    ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

            TheWhirlpool’s Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company are contained in the Financial Supplement to this report. Supplementary financial information regarding quarterly results of operations (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 20052007 and 20042006 is set forth in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For a list of financial statements and schedules filed as part of this report, see the Table of Contents to the Financial Supplement to this report on page F-1.


    ITEM 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
    Disclosure
    .

    None.



    ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures.

    Disclosure controls and procedures.    The CompanyWhirlpool maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company'sour filings under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company'sWhirlpool’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

    Prior to filing this report, the Companywe completed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company'sWhirlpool management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company'sour disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2005.2007. Based on this evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company'sour disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2005.2007.

            Management'sManagement’s report on internal control over financial reporting.reporting. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, Whirlpoolwe included a report of management'smanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as part of this report. Whirlpool's independent registered public accounting firm also attested to, and reported on, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management'sManagement’s report and the independent registered public accounting firm's attestation report areis included in Whirlpool'sthe Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Financial Supplement to this report under the captionscaption entitled "Management's“Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting"Reporting” and "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and areis incorporated herein by reference.

            Changes in internal control over financial reporting.There were no changes in the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20052007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting.


    ITEM 9B.Other Information.

    There was no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 20052007 that was not previously reported.


    PART III

    ITEM 10.Directors, and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
    and Corporate Governance.

    Information regarding the Company'sour executive officers is included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

    Information regarding the background of the directors, matters related to the Audit Committee, and Section 16(a) compliance can be found under the captions "Directors“Directors and Nominees for Election as Directors," "Board” “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Audit Committee," and "Section“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance"Compliance” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

    There have been no material changes to the procedures bythrough which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Company'sour Board of Directors since March 18, 2005,12, 2007, which is the date of the Company'sour last proxy statement.

            The Company hasWe have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of itsour employees, officers and directors, including itsour principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer



    (controller). The text of the Company'sour code of ethics is posted on its website atour website:www.whirlpoolcorp.com; click on the "Governance"“Governance” tab and then click on "Code“Code of Ethics." The Company” Whirlpool intends to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of the code of ethics for executive officers and directors on the Company's website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver. Stockholders may request a free copy of the code of ethics from:

    Larry M. Venturelli
    Greg Fritz

    Investor Relations

    Whirlpool Corporation

    2000 North M-63

    Mail Drop 2800

    Benton Harbor, MI 49022-2692

    Telephone: (269) 923-4678923-2641

    Whirlpool has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and written charters for its Audit, Finance, Human Resources and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, and Corporate Governance Guidelines, all of which are posted on the Company's website atour website:www.whirlpoolcorp.com; click on the "Governance"“Governance” tab, then click on "Board“Board of Directors,"Directors” and then click on "Committee“Committee Charters." Stockholders may request a free copy of the charters and guidelines from the address or telephone number set forth above.


    ITEM 11.Executive Compensation.

    Information with respect to compensation of our executive officers and directors of the Company can be found under the captions "Executive“Nonemployee Director Compensation," "Stock Option Grants” “Compensation Discussion and Related Information," "Stock Option Exercises and Holdings," "Long-Term Incentive Awards," "Agreements with Executive Officers and Related Party Transactions," "Retirement Benefits," "HumanAnalysis,” “Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and "Compensation of Directors"“Executive Compensation Tables” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. See also the information under the caption “Human Resources Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference; however, such information is only “furnished” hereunder and not deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


    ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

    Information with respect to the security ownership byof any person(s) known to the Companyperson that we know to beneficially own more than 5% of the Company'sWhirlpool stock and by each Whirlpool director, of the Company, each Whirlpool named executive officer, of the Company, and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, can be found under the captions "Security Ownership"“Security Ownership” and "Beneficial Ownership"“Beneficial Ownership” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

    Information relating to securities authorized under equity compensation plans can be found under the caption "Equity“Equity Compensation Plan Information"Information” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.


    ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
    Transactions, and Director Independence.

    Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions can be found under the caption "Agreements with Executive Officers and Related Party Transactions"“Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.


    ITEM 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
    Services
    .

    Information relating to the Company'sour auditors and the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s pre-approval policies can be found under the caption "Matters“Matters Relating to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm"Firm” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. The "Audit“Audit Committee Report"Report” is not incorporated herein by reference.



    PART IV

    ITEM 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

      (a)

      The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

      1.

      The financial statements and related notes, and reports of management and the independent registered public accounting firm, listed in the Table of Contents to the Financial Supplement to this report. Individual financial statements of the registrant'sregistrant’s affiliated foreign companies, accounted for by the equity method, have been omitted since no such company individually constitutes a significant subsidiary.

      2.

      "Schedule II - -  “Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts"Accounts” contained in the Financial Supplement to this report. Certain schedules for which provisions are made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

      3.

      The exhibits listed in the "Exhibit Index"“Exhibit Index” attached to this report.

      SIGNATURES


      SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

       WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

              (Registrant)





      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

      (Registrant)

      By:

      /s/ ROYS/    ROY W. TEMPLINTEMPLIN        


      February 22, 2008

      Roy W. Templin

      Executive Vice President

      and Chief Financial Officer

       March 1, 2006

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

      Signature
      Title







      Signature


        

      Title


       

       

      JEFFJEFF M. FETTIG*FETTIG*


      Jeff M. Fettig

        

      Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

          (Principal Executive Officer)

       

      DAVID L. SWIFT*

      David L. Swift


      MICHAEL A. TODMAN*

      Michael A. Todman

      Director and President, Whirlpool North America


       


      MICHAEL A. TODMAN*

      Michael A. Todman


      Director and President, Whirlpool International



      /s/ ROYS/    ROY W. TEMPLINTEMPLIN        


      Roy W. Templin


        

      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

          (Principal Financial Officer)


       


      LARRYLARRY M. VENTURELLI*VENTURELLI*


      Larry M. Venturelli


        

      Vice President and Controller

          (Principal Accounting Officer)


       


      HERMAN CAIN*

      Herman Cain


      Director



      GARYHERMAN CAIN*

      Herman Cain

      Director

      GARY T. DICAMILLO*DICAMILLO*


      Gary T. DiCamillo


        

      Director


       


      ALLAN D. GILMOUR*

      Allan D. Gilmour


      Director



      KATHLEENKATHLEEN J. HEMPEL*HEMPEL*


      Kathleen J. Hempel


        

      Director


       



      MICHAELMICHAEL F. JOHNSTON*JOHNSTON*


      Michael F. Johnston


        

      Director


       


      ARNOLDWILLIAM T. KERR*

      William T. Kerr

      Director

      ARNOLD G. LANGBO*LANGBO*


      Arnold G. Langbo


        

      Director


       


      PAULMILES L. MARSH*

      Miles L. Marsh

      Director

      Signature

      Title

      PAUL G. STERN*STERN*


      Paul G. Stern


        

      Director


       


      JANICEJANICE D. STONEY*STONEY*


      Janice D. Stoney


        

      Director


       


      MICHAELMICHAEL D. WHITE*WHITE*


      Michael D. White


        

      Director


       







      *By:

      /s/ DANIELS/    DANIEL F. HOPPHOPP        


      Daniel F. Hopp

        

      Attorney-in-Fact

       March 1, 2006

      February 22, 2008


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

      Whirlpool CorporationFinancial Supplement

      Financial Supplement
      to 20052007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and

      to 20062008 Proxy Statement

      Table of Contents

      Management's

      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        F-2

      Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome


        

      F-23F-16

      Consolidated Balance Sheets


        

      F-24F-17

      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


        

      F-25F-18

      Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity


        

      F-26F-19

      Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


        

      F-27F-20

      Eleven-Year

      Five-Year Selected Financial Data

      F-55

      Report by Management on the Consolidated Statistical ReviewFinancial Statements


        

      F-56

      Reports

      Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      F-57

      Report of Management and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


        

      F-58

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      F-59

      Schedule II — II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


        

      F-62F-60


      MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      This Management Discussion and Analysis should be read in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Selected Financial Data included in this Financial Supplement to the Form 10-K. Also, certain references to particular information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are made to assist readers.

      EXECUTIVE LEVEL OVERVIEW

      Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”) is a globalthe world’s leading manufacturer of major home appliances with 2005 revenues of $14.3$19.4 billion and net earnings of $422 million. The Company's four reportable segments$640 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. We are based on geography and consist of North America (61% of revenue), Europe (22% of revenue), Latin America (14% of revenue), and Asia (3% of revenue). The Company is a leading producer of major home appliances in North America and Latin America and hashave a significant presence in markets throughout Europe India and China. WhirlpoolIndia. We have received worldwide recognition for accomplishments in a variety of business and social efforts, including leadership, diversity, innovative product design, business ethics, social responsibility and community involvement. We conduct our business through four reportable segments, which we define based on geography. Our reportable segments consist of North America (60% of revenue), Europe (20% of revenue), Latin America (18% of revenue), and Asia (2% of revenue).

      The Company's growthOur global branded consumer products strategy over the past several years has been to introduce innovative new products, increase brand customer loyalty, expand our presence in foreign markets, enhance customer recognition of its brands, continue to expand itsour trade management platform, improve total cost and quality by expanding and leveraging our global footprint, expand distribution channelsoperating platform and where appropriate, make strategic acquisitions which enhance the Company's cost competitiveness, innovative globaland investments.

      We monitor country-specific economic factors such as gross domestic product, offeringconsumer confidence, retail trends, housing starts and efficiency.completions, sales of existing homes and mortgage interest rates as key indicators of industry demand. In addition to profitability, we also focus on country, brand, product and channel sales when assessing and forecasting financial results.

      Competition in the home appliance industry is intense worldwide.in all global markets we serve. In the U.S., in addition to our traditional competitors such as Electrolux, GE, and Kenmore and Maytag,in North America, there are new and expanding foreignhas been an emergence of strong global competitors such as LG, Bosch Siemens, Samsung, Fisher & Paykel, and Haier. Moreover, the U.S.In each geographic region, our customer base is consolidated and characterized by large, sophisticated trade customers who have many choices and demand for competitive products, services and prices. On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool entered into an agreement to acquireWe believe that our acquisition of Maytag for which regulatory approval is pending. The transaction is subject to certain conditions. Whirlpool believes that its' combinationCorporation (“Maytag”) on March 31, 2006, coupled with Maytagproductivity and cost controls, new innovative product introductions, and improved product mix will enhance itsour ability to respond to these competitive conditions, andconditions. We believe this combination will benefittranslate into benefits for our trade customers and consumers of the combined company by generating significant cost savings that will enable itus to continue to offer competitive prices across a wide array of innovative, high-quality consumer products as well asthat translate into increased product qualitysales and innovation.

      The Company monitors country-specific economic factors such as gross domestic product, consumer interest rates, consumer confidence, housing starts, sales of existing homes and mortgage refinancing as key indicators of industry demand. Management also focuses on country, brand, product and channel sales, average sales values, and profitability when assessing and forecastingenhanced financial results.

      During 2007, we delivered record sales and earnings per share in a challenging global market. The Company intendsU.S. appliance industry experienced the largest year-over-year volume decline in over two decades and material- and oil-related costs increased $600 million from the prior year. During the last three and a half years we have seen unprecedented material cost inflation which has increased our input cost over the same time frame by $1.7 billion. We accomplished a major milestone in 2007 by completing the Maytag integration and achieved our initial acquisition cost efficiency goals one year ahead of plan. We also improved our cost productivity performance across the organization. Our international business reported record results with significant improvements over 2006 while North America results were lower primarily due to utilize its global manufacturing, procurementa weak U.S. industry appliance demand and technology footprintsignificantly higher material costs.

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      FACTORS AFFECTING COMPARABILITY

      On March 31, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Maytag. Maytag’s reported consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 were approximately $4.9 billion. With the acquisition, we added an array of home appliance brands includingMaytag,Jenn-Air andAmana. The aggregate purchase price for Maytag was approximately $1.9 billion, including approximately $848 million of cash and approximately 9.7 million shares of common stock. The results of Maytag’s operations have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements as of April 1, 2006. For additional information on the acquisition of Maytag, see Note 2 of the Notes to enhance Whirlpool's positionthe Consolidated Financial Statements.

      During 2007 and 2006, we completed certain divestitures associated with businesses acquired with the Maytag acquisition. For additional information about discontinued operations, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      During the first quarter of 2007, we adopted changes to our segment reporting consistent with the methodology our chief operating decision maker now uses to evaluate each segment’s operating and financial results. We previously included the financial results for our Caribbean and certain Latin America operations and exports of certain portable appliances to Europe within our North America business segment. The results for these businesses are now being reported within the Latin America and Europe segments, respectively. All prior periods presented have been reclassified to reflect current year presentation.

      We have reallocated certain costs previously included within corporate administrative expense to each of the respective regions. Regional results for 2006 and 2005 have been reclassified to reflect these changes to conform to 2007 presentation. For further discussion, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Freight and warehousing costs previously included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the global appliance industry.Consolidated Statements of Income were reclassified to cost of sales, effective January 1, 2006. Approximately $854 million was reclassified in 2005.

      Management's Discussion and Analysis discusses, among other things, the results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and liquidity, contractual obligations and forward-looking cash requirements, critical accounting policies and estimates, new accounting pronouncements, market risk and the nature of, and risk associated with forward-looking statements contained herein. In addition, the Company has included comments regarding regional business unit performance, where appropriate.


      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

       TheFor the year ended December 31, 2007, consolidated net sales were $19.4 billion. Consolidated Statements of Operations present the Company's operating resultsnet earnings from continuing operations were $647 million, or $8.10 per diluted share, increasing from $486 million or $6.35 per diluted share for the last three years. This sectionyear ended December 31, 2006. The increase in earnings from continuing operations primarily reflects strong operating profit improvement within our international businesses, cost-efficiency realization associated with the acquisition of Management's DiscussionMaytag, cost based price increases and Analysis highlights the main factors affecting changesimproved product mix, productivity improvements and strong cost controls. Our results included $72 million of gains associated with asset sales in 2007, compared to $42 million of asset gains in the Company's financial conditionprevious year period. Annual results were negatively impacted by significantly higher material- and results of operationsoil-related costs and should be read along with the Consolidated Financial Statements.lower shipments within North America.

      Our international businesses experienced strong performance in 2007 driven by an 8.8% increase in units sold. We experienced a 6.4% decrease in unit sales during 2007 in North America, primarily resulting from a decline in appliance industry demand, lower original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) sales and lower share within our value and Maytag brands.

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      NET SALESRESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

       

      Consolidated Net Sales

      The total number oftable below summarizes by region consolidated net sales and units which includes primarily major and small appliances, sold in 2005 increased 1.3% over 2004. sold:

      Millions of dollars

            2007          Change          2006          Change          2005     

      Consolidated Net Sales

              

      North America

        $11,735  0.8%  $11,642  34.5%  $8,658 

      Europe

         3,848  12.1   3,432  7.1   3,205 

      Latin America

         3,437  27.7   2,692  23.9   2,172 

      Asia

         557  21.9   457  8.3   422 

      Other/Eliminations

         (169)    (143)    (140)
                       

      Consolidated

        $19,408  7.3  $18,080  26.3  $14,317 
                       

      In thousands

            2007          Change          2006          Change          2005     

      Units Sold

              

      North America

         30,352  (6.4)%   32,413  21.6%   26,664 

      Europe

         13,641  3.5   13,177  5.0   12,551 

      Latin America

         8,303  18.8   6,987  22.9   5,687 

      Asia

         2,558  9.0   2,346  6.1   2,212 

      Other/Eliminations

         (3)    (42)    (18)
                       

      Consolidated

         54,851     54,881  16.5   47,096 
                       

      Consolidated net sales increased 8.3% over 2004.7.3% compared to 2006 due to strong international sales, higher global average unit selling prices and a full year’s contribution from the acquisition of Maytag. We define the average unit selling price as the amount that results from dividing consolidated net sales by units sold. Excluding currency fluctuations and the impact of the acquisition of Maytag, sales were essentially equal to the prior year.

      Consolidated net sales for 2006 increased 26.3% compared to 2005 due primarily to the acquisition of Maytag and strong international sales. Excluding currency fluctuations and the impact of Maytag, consolidated net sales increased approximately 6%5%. Total number of units sold in 2004 increased 4.9% over 2003. Consolidated 2004 net sales increased 8.6% over 2003. Excluding currency fluctuations, net sales increased approximately 6%. The tables below present units sold and net sales by region.

      In thousands

       2005
       Change
       2004
       Change
       2003
       
      Units Sold           
      North America 27,572 0.8%27,353 4.6%26,146 
      Europe 12,351 2.1 12,100 4.4 11,591 
      Latin America 4,979 1.5 4,904 14.9 4,269 
      Asia 2,212 3.1 2,145 (8.6)2,346 
      Other/Eliminations (18) (17) (37)
        
       
       
       
       
       
      Consolidated 47,096 1.3%46,485 4.9%44,315 
        
       
       
       
       
       
      Millions of dollars

       2005
       Change
       2004
       Change
       2003
       
      Net Sales              
      North America $8,913 8.0%$8,254 4.8%$7,875 
      Europe  3,160 3.2  3,062 13.8  2,691 
      Latin America  1,962 17.2  1,674 24.0  1,350 
      Asia  422 10.5  382 (8.2) 416 
      Other/Eliminations  (140)  (152)  (156)
        
       
       
       
       
       
      Consolidated $14,317 8.3%$13,220 8.6%$12,176 
        
       
       
       
       
       

      Significant regional trends were as follows:

      North America net sales increased in 2007 by 0.8% compared to 2006 due to a 7.6% increase in the average unit selling price offset by a 6.4% decrease in units sold. The decrease in volume reflects reduced industry volume, lower OEM shipments and lower market share. The reduction in volume in the U.S. was partially offset by higher demand in Canada and Mexico and a higher average unit selling price due to product innovation and better product mix. Excluding the impact of the Maytag acquisition, North America sales decreased 5%. North America sales increased in 2006 compared to 2005 by 34.5% due primarily to the acquisition of Maytag. As compared to the prior year, unit volumes increased 21.6%. The average unit selling price increased 10.6% compared to 2005 which also contributed to higher net sales. Excluding the impact of the Maytag acquisition, net sales increased 4% and unit volumes increased 2%. Organic volume and sales growth were driven by continued consumer demand for new product innovations and improvedWhirlpool andKitchenAidbrand performance.

      Europe net sales increased in 2007 by 12.1% compared to 2006, primarily due to favorable foreign currency, a higher average unit selling price and higher volume. The increase in sales due to price is a result of an 8.3% higher average unit selling price as compared to prior year. The increase in volume is driven by strongWhirlpool brand performance and the positive impact of new product offerings.

      In 2005, NorthMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      Excluding the impact of foreign currency, Europe net sales increased 2.9% in 2007. Net sales increased 7.1% in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to higher volume. Average selling price increased 2% contributing to the remaining increase. Europe’s strong sales are driven by gains in market share, new product introductions and improved product mix, primarily attributable to the Whirlpool brand and expansion of our built-in appliance business. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, Europe net sales increased 6.0% in 2006.

      Latin America unit volumesnet sales increased approximately 1%27.7% in 2007 as compared to 2006, primarily due to higher volume and a favorable impact from changes in foreign currency. As compared to prior year, the 2004 period reaching record levels. Volume increases, driven by continued consumer demand fortotal number of units sold increased 18.8%. The increase in volume growth is a result of strong growth in the Company's new product innovations, were partially offset by lower OEM shipments.appliance industry, increased market share, strong economic conditions throughout the region and cost based pricing. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, Latin America net sales increased 15.9% in 2007. Net sales increased 8% during23.9% in 2006 as compared to 2005 or approximately 7% excludingdue primarily to higher volumes. Total units sold increased 22.9% compared to 2005 due primarily to continued strength in the Brazilian economy, appliance market and market share gains that were a result of new product introductions. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, fluctuations,Latin America net sales increased 16.0% in 2006.

      Asia net sales increased 21.9% in 2007 as compared to 2006 due to a record $8.9 billion.higher average unit selling price, increased volume and a favorable impact from changes in the value of foreign currency. The increase in sales due to price is a result of an 11.8% higher net sales wereaverage unit selling price as compared to prior year. These increases are driven by the combinationimpact of cost-based price adjustments and volume increases in theWhirlpool andKitchenAid brands during 2005. In 2004, North America unit volumes increased 4.6% as compared to 2003, due to higher sales growth inWhirlpool andKitchenAid branded products combined with strong Canadian performance. Net sales increased 4.8% as compared to 2003, to $8.3 billion. Currency fluctuations did not materially impact net sales comparisons.

      In 2005, Europe unit volumes increased 2.1%, reaching record levels and outpacing industry growth. Solid demand forWhirlpool branded products and continued strong performance within the Company's built-in appliance business drove the increase. Net sales increased 3.2%, to a record $3.2 billion in 2005. Currency did not have a material impact on sales during the year. In 2004, Europe unit volumes

        increased 4.4%, ahead of industry growth, as compared to 2003, driven largely by strongWhirlpool brand performance and expansion of the Company's built-in appliance business. Europe's net sales increased 13.8%, or approximately 3% excluding currency fluctuations. Overall market share improved due toWhirlpool brand performance andsuccessful new product introductions.

      In 2005, Latin America unit volumes increased 1.5% versus 2004, due mainly to increases in the Brazilian appliance market. Net sales increased 17.2% as compared to 2004, or approximately 6% excluding currency fluctuations, to $2.0 billion, due primarily to increased unit volumes and cost-based price adjustments on compressors and appliances. Strong demand for home appliances in Latin America during 2004 resulted in a 14.9% increase in unit volumes versus 2003. Economic conditions within Brazil were strong during 2004 driven by GDP expansion, lower unemployment and positive real wage growth. Net sales increased 24% in the region during 2004, and were approximately 20% higher excluding currency fluctuations, due to market share gains, strong volume, cost-based price adjustments and favorable product mix.

      In 2005, Asia unit volumes increased 3.1% as compared to 2004, driven mainly by industry growth and new product introductions. Net sales improved 10.5%, or approximately 8% excluding currency fluctuations, due largely to anintroductions, improved product mix and cost-basedcontinued growth within India, the segment’s largest market. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, Asia net sales increased 12.9% in 2007. Net sales increased 8.3% in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to higher volume. Total units sold increased 6.1% compared to 2005 driven by strong demand, particularly in India, and favorable product mix. The average unit selling price adjustments implementedincreased 2.1% in 2005. In 2004, Asia unit volumes declined 8.6% versus 2003 with a corresponding decline2006, which contributed to the increase in net salessales. Excluding the impact of 8.2%. Excludingforeign currency, fluctuations,Asia net sales declined approximately 12%. Management's decision to implement a trade inventory reduction strategyincreased 10.1% in India negatively impacted 2004 volume and sales. The strategy change improves the speed, flexibility and overall efficiency within sales and distribution processes, and enables the Company to launch new product introductions more frequently and faster to the market.
      2006.

      GROSS MARGINGross Margin

       The consolidated gross margin percentage in 2005 decreased 40 basis points versus 2004. Consolidated results in 2005 were significantly impacted by higher material and oil-related cost increases which were mitigated by the combination of cost-based price adjustments and productivity improvements. Consolidated gross margin also benefited from the Brazilian government's export incentive program ("Befiex") tax credits (See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates to this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and was negatively impacted by higher incentive compensation.

      The consolidated gross margin percentage in 2004 decreased 902007 increased 20 basis points versus 2003 due primarily to second half material cost increases2006. Strong international performance, acquisition efficiencies, productivity improvements, regional tax incentives and global pricing pressures. These increasesasset sale gains had a positive impact on overall gross margin in 2007. Partially offsetting these improvements were partly mitigated bysignificantly higher volumematerial- and record levelsoil-related costs, particularly in the United States. Included in gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2007 are asset sale gains of controllable productivity.$65 million.



      The table below outlines thesummarizes gross margin percentages by region.region:

       
       2005
       Change
        
       2004
       Change
        
       2003
       
      Gross Margin               
      North America 21.1%(0.8)pts 21.9%(0.7)pts 22.6%
      Europe 23.0 (0.7)  23.7 0.1   23.6 
      Latin America 19.5 2.5   17.0 (2.6)  19.6 
      Asia 17.3 0.4   16.9 (3.8)  20.7 
        
       
         
       
         
       
      Consolidated(1) 21.3%(0.4)pts 21.7%(0.9)pts 22.6%
        
       
         
       
         
       

      (1)
      Restructuring charges included in Consolidated, excluded from regions.

             2007          Change          2006          Change          2005     

      North America

        12.5% (0.7)pts 13.2% (1.6)pts 14.8%

      Europe

        16.6  0.4  16.2  0.4  15.8 

      Latin America

        20.8  1.6  19.2  2.2  17.0 

      Asia

        15.2  (0.1) 15.3  3.9  11.4 

      Consolidated

        14.9  0.2  14.7  (0.6) 15.3 

      Significant regional trends were as follows:

      The 2005

      North America gross margin decreased 80 basis points asin 2007 compared to 2004, largely2006 primarily due to higher material- and oil-related costs and lower industry demand. This decrease was partially offset by favorable efficiencies

      as a result of synergies realized from the acquisition of Maytag, productivity improvements, product

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      innovation and an improved product mix as compared to 2006. Gross margin decreased in 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to higher material costs, lower industry demand, unfavorable Maytag product mix, acquisition integration, purchase accounting costs and higher merchandising costs. Margin declines were partially offset by productivity improvements and acquisition efficiencies.

      Europe gross margin increased in 2007 compared to 2006 as higher volumes, continued productivity improvements and innovative product offerings more than offset higher material- and oil-related costs. ResultsThe sale of certain assets also reflect the impact of cost-based price adjustments, productivity improvements andcontributed to higher incentive compensation. The 2004 gross margin. Gross margin decreased 70 basis pointsimproved in 2006 compared to 2003, due primarily to higher material costs for steel and resins. In addition, the market continued to experience increased pricing pressures during 2004. Margin declines were partially offset by higher volume, productivity improvements and some cost-based price adjustments.

      The 2005 Europe gross margin decreased 70 basis points as compared to 2004, largely driven by higher material and oil-related costs, partially offset by increased productivity, an improved product mix and, to a lesser extent, a gain on the sale of assets. In 2004, Europe gross margin improved slightly versus 2003 as productivity improvements and sales volume more than offset lower comparable model pricing pressure.and higher material- and oil-related costs. European operations continue to realize savings from ongoing restructuring efforts in Europe.

      The 2005 both 2007 and 2006.

      Latin America gross margin increased 250 basis points asin 2007 compared to 2004, as the combination of cost-based2006, due primarily to continued higher volumes, productivity improvements, cost based price adjustments, increased productivityincreases and Befiexregional tax creditsincentives which combined to more than offset higher materialmaterial- and oil-related costs and the unfavorable currency andimpact of foreign currency. Gross margin increased incentive compensation. In 2004, Latin America gross margin declined 260 basis pointsin 2006 versus 2003,2005, due primarily to significantly improved volumes, productivity improvements, cost control initiatives and regional tax incentives which combined to more than offset higher materialmaterial- and oil-related costs for steel and resins. Higherunfavorable currency exchange rates.

      Asia gross margin decreased slightly in 2007 as compared to 2006, due to higher material- and oil-related costs and inventory transition costs which were mitigated by productivity improvements, improved product mix and higher volumes. Gross margin increased in 2006 as compared to 2005, due to productivity improvements, improved product mix, and cost-based price adjustments which were partially offset by increased volume and cost-based price adjustments on both appliances and compressors and favorable product mix.

      The 2005 Asia gross margin increased 40 basis points as compared to 2004, due to improved product mix, productivity improvements and cost-based price adjustments partially offset by higher materialmaterial- and oil-related costs. Asia gross margin declined 380 basis points versus 2003 due primarily to the trade inventory reduction strategy in India

      Selling, General and regional pricing pressures.

      SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVEAdministrative

      The table below summarizes selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales by region:

      Millions of dollars

        2007  As a %
      of Sales
        2006  As a %
      of Sales
        2005  As a %
      of Sales

      North America

        $791  6.7%  $837  7.2%  $555  6.4%

      Europe

         391  10.2   363  10.6   347  10.8

      Latin America

         277  8.1   279  10.4   226  10.4

      Asia

         91  16.3   81  17.7   74  17.5

      Other/Eliminations

         186     192     141  
                        

      Consolidated

        $1,736  8.9  $1,752  9.7  $1,343  9.4
                        

      In 2005,2007, consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percent of consolidated net sales, declined 50 basis pointsdecreased as compared to 2004, as2006, primarily due to higher sales volume, acquisition efficiencies and administrative cost reductions and scale efficiencies offset higher freight and warehousing costs and incentive compensation in North America and Latin America. Europe results primarily reflect the positive impact from administrative productivity improvements and business scale. The Asia region also benefited from scale efficiencies. Thereductions. In 2006, consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004, as a percent of consolidated net sales, remained relatively unchanged versus 2003. Higher freight rates in North and Latin America in 2004 were partially offset by productivity in other non-logistic areas. Europe results reflect the positive impact from administrative productivity improvements and business scale. The increase in Asia's selling, general and administrative expenses as a


      percent of sales in 2004 was due primarily to lower overall sales and higher administrative support costs. In 2003, higher pension and freight costs in North America were partially offset by cost controls on discretionary spending. The European increase in 2003 was a result of expense reclassification into selling, general and administrative expenses while Latin America's improvement was primarily driven by lower bad debt expense in 2003. Asia's higher selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percent of consolidated net sales, in 2003increased as compared to 2005. The benefit from higher sales and acquisition efficiencies were due tomore than offset by increased brand investment, acquisition and integration costs and higher operating reserves. The table below outlines the selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales by region.compensation expense.

      Millions of dollars

       2005
       As a %
      of Sales

       2004
       As a %
      of Sales

       2003
       As a %
      of Sales

       
      Selling, General & Administrative                
      North America $1,073 12.0%$1,031 12.5%$970 12.3%
      Europe  563 17.8  560 18.3  510 19.0 
      Latin America  256 13.0  220 13.1  175 13.0 
      Asia  96 22.7  89 23.4  79 19.0 
      Other/Eliminations  211   189   186  
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Consolidated(1) $2,199 15.3%$2,089 15.8%$1,920 15.8%
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      (1)
      Restructuring-related charges included in Consolidated, excluded from regions.

      RESTRUCTURINGRestructuring

      Restructuring initiatives resulted in charges of $61 million, $55 million and $57 million $15 millionin 2007, 2006, and $3 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.respectively, reflecting ongoing efforts to optimize our global operating platform. These amounts have

      been identified as a separate component of operating profit. The Company expectsprofit, excluding Maytag severance and exit costs

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      associated with the acquisition, and primarily relate to expense upcosts incurred to $100 million forrestructure the cooking and refrigeration platforms in Latin America, shift refrigeration capacity to lower cost regions in Europe and North America and reorganize the salaried workforce throughout Europe. For additional information about restructuring, during 2006.

      At December 31, 2005, a liabilitysee Note 12 of $6 million remains for actions yet to be completed under the global restructuring plan that was originally announced in December of 2000. The remaining liability pertains to lease exit costs. The restructuring plan included the elimination of over 7,100 positions worldwide, of which substantially all had left the Company through December 31, 2005. See Note 11Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed description of these chargesStatements.

      Interest and the Company's restructuring program.

      INTEREST AND SUNDRY INCOME/EXPENSESundry Income (Expense)

      Interest and sundry expenseincome (expense) increased by $51$61 million versus 2004.from expense of $2 million to expense of $63 million compared to 2006. The primary drivers of this increase were an increase in legal reserves of approximately $21 million, higher foreign currency losses on balance sheet positions, the absence of prior year interest received on foreign tax audit settlements in Latin America andresults include a $9$31 million gain on the sale of an investment while current year expense includes a partial interest$17 million increase in an equity investment during 2004.legal reserves as well as higher non-income based taxes. Interest and sundry income (expense) for 2006 decreased by $63 million from expense for 2004 decreased $27of $65 million to expense of $2 million compared to 2003. The improvement2005. Lower expense in 2006 was primarily attributabledue to lower lossesthe combination of $17a gain of $31 million on foreign currency balance sheet positions, primarily in Europe, and a $9 million gain onthat was realized to reflect the sale of an investment and a partial interestcharge of $21 million that was recognized in an equity investment in Latin America.2005 to increase certain legal reserves.


      INTEREST EXPENSEInterest Expense

      Interest expense in 20052007 increased $2$1 million as compared to 2004.2006. For nine months in 2006, we incurred higher debt levels associated with debt assumed and issued for the Maytag acquisition which was offset by lower debt levels at lower interest rates during 2007. Interest expense in 2006 increased $72 million as compared to 2005. The increase was due primarily reflects debt service associated with debt assumed and issued to higher interest rates and a shift in global borrowing positions. The primary impact was in Brazil, which experienced both increased borrowing levels and higher interest rates on a year over year basis. The interest expense reduction during 2004 of $9 million was attributable to a lower overall U.S. interest rate environment, a decrease in borrowings in countries with higher interest rates, primarily Europe, and maturity of the $200 million 9% Debentures in March 2003, which was replaced with lower rate debt.acquire Maytag.

      INCOME TAXESGain on Sale of Investment

      During 2007, we sold approximately 9 million shares, or 7%, of Whirlpool of India Limited and recorded a gain of approximately $7 million. This sale was executed to satisfy a change in the Stock Exchange Board of India listing standards and regulations. Following the sale of stock, our ownership interest in Whirlpool of India Limited is 75%.

      Income Taxes

      The effective income tax rate was 14.5% in 2007, 20.4% in 2006 and 28.6% in 2005, 33.9%2005. The rates and changes in 2004rates result from a combination of certain discrete items recognized during the year, dispersion of global income, tax credit availability, and 35.0% in 2003. A primary drivertax planning activities. At the end of each interim period, we make our best estimate of the effective tax rate reduction during 2005 wasexpected to be applicable for the realization of foreign tax credits associated with a comprehensive plan that simplified the Company's legal structure, thereby permitting the tax-efficient repatriation of offshore cash via foreign tax credits. Additional items impacting the effective tax rate during all periods presented included the settlement of global tax auditsfull fiscal year and the overall dispersionimpact of global income. (Seediscrete items, if any, and adjust the incomequarterly rate, as necessary. For additional information about our consolidated tax rate reconciliation included inprovision, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a descriptionStatements.

      Earnings from Continuing Operations

      Earnings from continuing operations were $647 million in 2007 versus $486 million and $422 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, due to the factors described above.

      Millions of dollars, except per share data

                2007                  2006                  2005        

      Earnings from continuing operations

        $647  $486  $422

      Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share

         8.10   6.35   6.19

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      Discontinued Operations

      We classified the Hoover floor-care, Dixie-Narco vending systems, and Jade commercial and residential businesses as discontinued operations during 2006. The decision to divest these businesses allowed us to focus on our core appliance business. For additional information about discontinued operations, see Note 3 of the significant items impactingNotes to the consolidated effective income tax rate.)Consolidated Financial Statements.

      EQUITY IN EARNINGS (LOSS) OF AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND MINORITY INTERESTSNet Earnings

       Changes in equity in earnings (loss) of affiliated companies and minority interests reflect higher earnings in Latin America and India in 2005 and lower earnings in Latin America and India during 2004.

      NET EARNINGS

      Net earnings were $640 million in 2007 versus $433 million and $422 million in 2006 and 2005, versus $406 million and $414 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. 2005 earningsrespectively, due to the factors described above. Earnings were impacted by cost-based price adjustments, productivity improvements, administrative cost controls$7 million and a reduction$53 million in the effective tax rate. These items were partially offset by significantly higher material costs (particularly steellosses from discontinued operations for 2007 and resins), unfavorable currency fluctuations, increased incentive compensation expense, higher restructuring spending and increased legal reserves. 2004 earnings were significantly impacted by increases in material and logistics costs, particularly in the second half of the year. The higher costs in 2004 were partially offset by productivity improvements, lower foreign currency losses on balance sheet positions, an effective tax rate reduction, lower financing costs, and reduced minority interest earnings.2006, respectively.

      Millions of dollars, except per share data

       2005
       2004
       2003
        
        
      Net earnings $422 $406 $414    
      Diluted net earnings per share $6.19 $5.90 $5.91    

      Millions of dollars, except per share data

                2007                  2006                  2005        

      Net earnings

        $640  $433  $422

      Diluted net earnings per share

         8.01   5.67   6.19

      FORWARD-LOOKING PERSPECTIVE

       During 2005,We expect modest global appliance industry growth during 2008 primarily due to continued weaknesses in the Company incurred approximately $530 million of higher materialU.S. housing market and weaker economic conditions and consumer confidence in Western Europe. We continue to expect strong emerging market appliance industry growth. Within North America we expect industry demand to decline 3-5% for the year. Industry appliance demand in Europe is expected to be flat versus 2007 levels; Latin America and Asia are expected to grow 5-8% and 5-10% for the year, respectively.

      Prices for material- and oil-related costs. In responsecosts are expected to increase by approximately $350 million in 2008, largely driven by increases in component parts, base metals, such as copper, aluminum, zinc and nickel, as well as steel. We expect to offset these increases,higher costs with productivity improvements, new product introductions, including the Company introduced new innovativerevitalization ofMaytag branded products, improved productivity, reduced discretionary costs andpreviously implemented global cost-based price adjustments in key regions around the world. The combination of these actions contributed to the ability of the Company to deliver a record year of results.



      The Company expects positive earnings momentum to continue during 2006. Newand improved product introductions, productivity improvements, continued expansion of the Company's global operating platform and strong cost controls are expected to more than offset continued increases in material and oil-related costs.mix.

      In 2006, the Company will launch the largest number of new products to market in its history. The Company'sOur innovation product pipeline continues to grow and drive higher average sales values, consumer and trade response to itsour new product offerings has been positive, and the Company continueswe continue to consistently execute itsaccelerate our global branded consumer products strategy of delivering consumer-relevantrelevant innovation to markets worldwide.

      North America and Europe, the Company's two largest segments, expect 2006 industry growth of approximately 2 to 3% and 1 to 2%, respectively.

      Macro-economic conditions in Latin America are expected to remain positive during 2006 and the Company expects industry shipments to increase 6 to 8%.

      The Company expects industry shipments within Asia to increase 5 to 7% in 2006.

      In December 1996, Multibras and Empresa Brasileira de Compressores S.A. ("Embraco"), Brazilian subsidiaries, were granted additional export incentives in connection with Befiex. These incentives allowed the use of credits as an offset against current Brazilian federal excise tax on domestic sales. During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company recognized $23 million in export credits. The Company recognized no credits in 2004 and credits of $5 million in 2003. The credits are treated as a reduction of current excise taxes payable and, therefore, as an increase in net sales. At December 31, 2005, the Company's remaining credits are approximately $600 million after adjusting for currency fluctuations and a monetary adjustment. Currently, the Company is unable to recognize these credits but is exploring possible strategies which may permit future recognition of these credits.

      CASH FLOWS

       The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect the changes in cash and equivalents for the last three years by classifying transactions into three major categories: operating, investing and financing activities.

      Operating Activities

       Whirlpool's main source of liquidity is cash generated from operating activities, consisting of net earnings adjusted for non-cash operating items, such as depreciation, and changes in operating assets and liabilities such as receivables, inventories and payables.

      The Company's cash provided by operating activities in 2005 increased $87 million over 2004. Cash provided by operating activities benefited from lower inventories, reduced pension contributions and higher accrued expenses for payroll, incentive compensation, restructuring and promotional spending. Results were partially offset by higher accounts receivable balances due mainly to higher sales and lower payables primarily a result of lower inventory levels. Cash flow was also negatively impacted by a decrease in net taxes payable of $105 million, due, in part, to a reduction in tax expense. In 2004, cash provided by operating activities benefited from lower after-tax pension contributions of approximately $62 million and lower restructuring spending of approximately $56 million. In 2004, cash flow was negatively impacted by higher working capital requirements of about $70 million, driven largely by material cost increases and higher inventory levels to support higher volumes and increased trans-regional shipments. In 2003, cash provided by operating activities benefited from higher earnings, primarily within our European and North American business segments, as well as continued improvement in working capital management. Cash flow was negatively impacted by a voluntary after-tax pension contribution to the Company's U.S. pension plans



      of $97 million. The 2003 cash flow was also negatively impacted by restructuring spending, primarily related to 2002 projects, as well as the timing of promotional payments.

      The Company's free cash flow was $412 million versus $241 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

      The table below reconciles cash provided by operating activities determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP") to free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure. Management believes that free cash flow provides both management and shareholders with a relevant measure of liquidity and a useful basis for assessing the Company's ability to fund its activities and obligations. There are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including the difficulty associated with comparing companies that use similarly named non-GAAP measures but whose calculations may differ from the Company's calculations. As defined by the Company, free cash flow is cash provided by operating activities after capital expenditures, proceeds from the sale of business/assets and dividends paid. The following is a reconciliation of cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow.

       
       Year ended December 31
       
      Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
       
      Cash Provided by Operating Activities $  881 $  794 
      Capital expenditures  (494) (511)
      Proceeds from sale of business/assets  141  74 
      Dividends paid  (116) (116)
        
       
       
      Free cash flow $  412 $  241 
        
       
       

      Beginning in 2006, the Company will exclude dividends paid from the definition of free cash flow.

      Investing Activities

       The principal recurring investing activities are property additions, which were $494 million, $511 million and $423 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These expenditures are primarily for equipment and tooling, driven by product innovation initiatives, more efficient production methods, and replacement for normal wear and tear. Expenditures are also made to support the Company's global operating platform footprint moves to lower cost locations as well as replacement, regulatory and infrastructure changes.

      In each of 2005, 2004 and 2003, Whirlpool entered into separate sale-leaseback transactions whereby the Company sold and leased back certain of its owned properties. Proceeds related to the sale-leaseback of four properties in 2005, net of related fees, were approximately $67 million. In 2004, proceeds related to sale-leasebacks of six properties, net of related fees, were approximately $66 million. In 2003, proceeds related to the sale-leaseback of four properties, net of related fees, were approximately $65 million.

      Cash proceeds of $48 million resulted from the sale of a non-core business in Latin America during 2005. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

      Cash paid in 2005 in connection with the proposed Maytag acquisition totaled $77 million, primarily consisting of $40 million to reimburse Maytag for its payment of a fee to terminate its prior merger agreement with Triton Acquisition Holding Co. and $37 million of professional fees incurred in connection with the proposed acquisition. These costs have been capitalized and are recognized in the other assets line within the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. If consummation of the transaction does not occur, the costs will be reclassified to expense.



      On November 18, 2002, the Company acquired the remaining 20% interest in Whirlpool Narcissus Shanghai Company Limited ("Narcissus") for $9 million. Subsequent to the purchase, Narcissus was renamed Whirlpool Home Appliance (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. In accordance with the purchase agreement, 40% of the purchase price was paid during 2002, 40% was paid during 2003 and the remaining 20% was paid during 2004.

      Financing Activities

       Total repayments of short-term and long-term debt, net of new borrowings, were $131 million, $58 million and $208 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      During March 2003, the Company redeemed its $200 million 9% Debentures using short-term notes payable.

      Dividends paid to stockholders totaled $116 million, $116 million and $94 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Under its stock repurchase programs, Whirlpool used $34 million, $251 million, and $65 million to purchase approximately 0.5 million, 3.7 million and 1 million shares of common stock in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail on the Company's stock repurchase program.

      The Company also redeemed $33 million in preferred stock of its discontinued finance company, Whirlpool Financial Corporation, in 2003. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail on the Whirlpool Financial Corporation preferred stock.

      Whirlpool received proceeds of $102 million in 2005, $64 million in 2004 and $65 million in 2003 related to the exercise of Company stock options. The Company's stock option program is discussed in Notes 1 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

       The Company'sOur objective is to finance itsour business through anthe appropriate mix of long-term and short-term debt. By diversifying itsthe maturity structure, the Company avoidswe avoid concentrations of debt, reducing liquidity risk. Whirlpool hasWe have varying needs for short-term working capital financing as a result of the nature of itsour business. The volume and timing of refrigeration and air conditioning production impact the Company'simpacts our cash flows withand consists of increased production in the first half of the year to meet increased demand in the summer months. The Company finances itsWe finance working capital needsfluctuations primarily through the commercial paper markets in the U.S., and Europe, and Canada. These commercial paper programswhich are supported by committed bank lines.lines, and we anticipate that access to these markets will continue to remain available. In addition, outside the U.S., short-term funding is also provided by bank borrowings on uncommitted lines. The Company hasWe have access to long-term funding in the U.S., EuropeanEurope and other public bond markets. We are in compliance with the financial covenants for all periods presented. For a description of financing arrangements that had an effect on our liquidity, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      On June 15, 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $500 million of outstanding common stock. We repurchased $368 million of outstanding common stock for the year ended December 31, 2007. Approximately $97 million of the authorization remains outstanding.

      Sources and Uses of Cash

      We expect to meet our cash needs for 2008 from cash flows from continuing operations, cash and equivalents and financing arrangements. Our cash and equivalents were $201 million at December 31, 2007 as compared to $262 million at December 31, 2006.

      Cash Flows from Operating Activities of Continuing Operations

      Cash provided by continuing operating activities in 2007 was $927 million, an increase of $47 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Cash provided by continuing operations for 2007 reflects higher earnings primarily from our Latin America and Europe segments as compared to 2006. Cash provided by continuing operations also reflects cash consumed from increased inventories as a result of lower than anticipated demand in North America during the fourth quarter of 2007 as well as support for higher sales volumes in Latin America and product transitions in the U.S. The increased inventory balances were more than offset by improved trade receivable collections, improved accounts payable terms as well as lower global taxes. Cash provided by continuing operations was negatively impacted by increased spending associated with a Maytag dishwasher recall. Cash provided by continuing operating activities in 2006 was $880 million, a decrease of $4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. Cash provided by operating activities benefited from higher earnings, primarily within our European and Latin American business segments. Increased inventories, which include higher laundry inventory to support plant closures and transition of the Maytag laundry product to Whirlpool facilities, consumed additional cash during 2006 but were largely offset by improvements in accounts receivable collections and increases in accounts payable. For additional information about product recalls and our reportable operating segments, see Note 8 and Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations

      Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was an outflow of $331 million compared to an outflow of $1.2 billion last year. The decrease was primarily due to cash disbursed to acquire Maytag, net of cash acquired, of $797 million and the purchase of minority interest shares of a Brazil subsidiary in the amount of $53 million during 2006. Offsetting cash used in investing activities from continuing operations were proceeds received from the sale of certain Maytag discontinued businesses of $100 million and $110 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations increased $764 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to 2005, primarily due to cash disbursed to acquire Maytag and increased capital spending to support the expansion of the operations in Mexico and the integration of Maytag. Offsetting cash flow used in investing activities from continuing operations in 2006 are proceeds received for the sale of certain Maytag discontinued businesses. For additional information on the acquisition of Maytag and the sale of its discontinued businesses, see Note 2 and Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      The Company's financialgoal of our global operating platform is to enhance our competitive position remains strong. Atin the global home appliance industry by reducing costs, driving productivity and quality improvements, and accelerating our rate of innovation. We plan to continue our comprehensive worldwide effort to optimize our regional manufacturing facilities, supply base, product platforms and technology resources to better support our global products, brands and customers. We intend to make additional investments to improve our competitiveness in fiscal 2008. Capital

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      spending is expected to be between $600 million and $625 million in 2008 in support of our investment in innovative product technologies and our global operating platform initiatives.

      Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations

      Cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was an outflow of $696 million in the year ended December 31, 20052007 compared to an inflow of $29 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Net repayments of short-term borrowings were $243 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to borrowings of $381 million in the prior year. The prior year reflects short-term debt issued to pay our maturing $300 million Eurobond principal. Prior year results also reflect proceeds of long-term debt which replaced commercial paper borrowings initially issued to finance the acquisition of Maytag. Repayments of long-term debt reflect the maturity of Whirlpool and 2004, Whirlpool's total assets were $8.2 billion. Stockholders' equity increasedMaytag debt. During the year ended December 31, 2007 we also repurchased stock totaling $368 million, paid dividends to common stockholders totaling $134 million and received proceeds from $1.6 billion at the endissuance of 2004common stock related to $1.7 billion at the endoption exercises of $68 million. Cash used in financing activities from continuing operations in 2006 was an inflow of $29 million compared to an outflow of $170 million in 2005. The increase in equitycash is primarily attributeddue to net earnings retention and proceeds received from long term debt associated with the exerciseacquisition of stock options.Maytag that was not completely repaid by year end. These increases were partially offset by decreaseslower common stock issuances in equity due2006 as compared to minimum pension liability adjustments and share repurchases.

      The Company's overall debt levels have decreased since 2004. Cash flows from operations and proceeds from sales of assets/businesses have been used to repay debt, fund capital expenditures and pay dividends.


      On December 2, 2005, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Long Term Five-Year Credit Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") by and among the Company, certain other borrowers, the lenders referred to therein, Citibank N.A., as administrative agent and fronting agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and ABN Amro Bank N.V., Royal Bank of Scotland and Bank of America, as documentation agents, which amends and restates the Amended and Restated Long Term Credit Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004. On December 2, 2005, the parties to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also entered into a 364-Day Credit Agreement (the "364-Day Credit Agreement" and together with the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the "Credit Facilities").

      The Credit Facilities provide for an aggregate of $2.7 billion in committed unsecured revolving credit facilities. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement consists of a $2.2 billion 5-year credit facility, which includes a $200 million letter of credit subfacility. The 364-Day Credit Agreement consists of a $500 million 364-day credit facility, which may be converted into a term loan. Borrowing capacity of $1.2 billion under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement became available on December 2, 2005. Borrowing capacity of $500 million under the 364-Day Credit Agreement and the remaining $1.0 billion under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement will become available upon the Department of Justice's final clearance of the acquisition of Maytag. Borrowings under the Credit Facilities will be available to the Company and designated subsidiaries for general corporate purposes, including commercial paper support. Subsidiary borrowings under the facilities, if any, will be guaranteed by the Company. Interest under the Credit Facilities accrues at a variable annual rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin dependent on the Company's credit rating at that time.

      The Credit Facilities require the Company to meet certain financial tests, including a leverage ratio of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and an interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.0 to 1.0. The Credit Facilities also contain covenants which, among other things, require the Company to deliver to the lenders specified financial information, including annual and quarterly financial information, and limit the Company's ability to (or to permit any subsidiaries to), subject to various exceptions and limitations, (i) merge with other companies, (ii) create liens on its property; (iii) incur debt or off-balance sheet obligations at subsidiary level; (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates, except on an arms-length basis; (v) enter into agreements restricting the payment of subsidiary dividends or restricting the making of loans or repayment of debt by subsidiaries to the Company or other subsidiaries; and (vi) enter into agreements restricting the creation of liens on its assets.

      On February 7, 2006, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") relating to an indeterminate amount of Debt Securities.

      In August 2005, in connection with its proposed acquisition of Maytag, Whirlpool was placed on credit watch with negative implications by Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. No action has been taken by any of the rating agencies concerning the Company's rating, and action, if any, would be taken after the acquisition of Maytag. The Company does not anticipate that any future adjustments to these ratings would have a material impact on its liquidity. The Company's short-term credit rating has been confirmed, and accordingly, availability of the commercial paper markets remains unchanged.

      The Company's Eurobonds of EUR 300 million principal amount will mature in June 2006. The Eurobonds U.S. dollar value at December 31, 2005 was $357 million. The Company anticipates replacing the Eurobonds with a domestic bond offering and commercial paper.

      On September 9, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with Harbor Shores Community Redevelopment Inc. ("Harbor Shores"), a not-for-profit entity, whereby Whirlpool Corporation agreed to



      loan up to $12 million to Harbor Shores, secured by a mortgage on real estate owned by Harbor Shores. As of December 31, 2005, $4.5 million had been loaned under this agreement. Membership interests in Harbor Shores are held by three U.S. not-for-profit entities, including Whirlpool Foundation. Certain current and former members of the Whirlpool Corporation management team are involved in the Harbor Shores project, including Whirlpool's current CFO and its former CEO, both of whom are trustees and officers of Harbor Shores. None of these individuals receives any compensation from the Company or the Whirlpool Foundation for their services to Harbor Shores. The purpose of the Harbor Shores project is to transform approximately 530 acres in Benton Harbor and St. Joseph, Michigan, into a residential and commercial community with a goal of spurring economic development and further increasing the attractiveness of employment in southwest Michigan.

      On December 12, 2005, the Company announced that it invested $250 million in its North American manufacturing base during 2005. In the last 12 months, the Company has made improvements to its washer and dryer facilities in Ohio, began production of formed door refrigerators in Fort Smith, Arkansas and begun production of a new clothes washer in Monterrey, Mexico. In addition, the Company has completed the construction of a refrigerator plant in Ramos Arizpe, Mexico that will begin producing refrigerators later in 2006. These investments continue the Company's ongoing effort to expand its innovation capability and optimize its global operating platform.

      OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

       The CompanyWhirlpool has guarantee arrangements in place in a Brazilian subsidiary. As a standard business practice in Brazil, the subsidiary guarantees customer lines of credit at commercial banks, supporting purchases from the Company,Whirlpool, following its normal credit policies. If a customer were to default on its line of credit with the bank, the subsidiary would be required to satisfy the obligation with the bank, and the receivable would revert back to the subsidiary. As of December 31, 20052007 and 2004,2006, these amounts totaled $236$331 million and $184$312 million, respectively. TheOur only recourse the Company has related to these agreements would beis legal or administrative collection efforts directed against the customer.

      CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND FORWARD-LOOKING CASH REQUIREMENTS

      The following table summarizes the Company'sour expected cash outflows resulting from financial contracts and commitments.

       
       Payments due by period
      Millions of dollars

       Total
       2006
       2007 &
      2008

       2009 &
      2010

       Thereafter
      Debt obligations(1) $1,110 $365 $136 $367 $242
      Operating lease obligations  250  85  112  44  9
      Purchase obligations  1,131  224  429  389  89
      Long-term liabilities(2)  107  107      
        
       
       
       
       
       Total $2,598 $781 $677 $800 $340
        
       
       
       
       

      (1)
      The amounts in debt obligations do not include an estimate of future interest payments. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Eurobond maturity in 2006.

      (2)
      The amounts in long-term liabilities include the Company's expected 2006 voluntary U.S. pension and foreign pension fund contributions, and expected benefit payments under the postretirement health care benefit plans. Required contributions for future years depend on certain factors that cannot be determined at this time.

      The goal of the Company's global operating platform is to enhance the Company's competitive position in the global home appliance industry. The Company plans to continue its comprehensive worldwide effort to optimize its regional manufacturing facilities, supply base, product platforms and technology resources to better support its global products, brands and customers. The Company intends to make additional investments to improve its competitiveness in fiscal 2006. Capital spending is expected to be between $500 million and $525 million in 2006 in support of the Company's investment in innovative product technologies and its global operating platform initiatives. The Company expects that higher cash flow from operations will more than offset increased capital spending.commitments:

      During 2004, Whirlpool's Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend from 34 cents per share to 43 cents per share.

         Payments due by period

      Millions of dollars

        Total  2008  2009 &
      2010
        2011 &
      2012
        Thereafter

      Long-term debt obligations(1)

        $1,795  $127  $578  $304  $786

      Operating lease obligations

         547   144   195   112   96

      Purchase obligations(2)

         950   261   440   241   8

      Other long-term liabilities(3)

         155   155         
                          

      Total

        $3,447  $687  $1,213  $657  $890
                          

      (1)Interest on long-term debt is not included in the table above. For additional information about our debt, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      (2)Purchase obligations include our “take-or-pay” contracts with materials vendors and minimum payment obligations to other suppliers.

      (3)Other long-term liabilities include our expected 2008 voluntary U.S. pension and foreign pension fund contributions in the amount of $121 million. Required contributions for future years depend on certain factors that cannot be determined at this time. Additionally, included in other long-term liabilities are $34 million of our $189 million in liabilities related to uncertain tax positions. We cannot estimate the period in which the remaining liabilities relating to uncertain tax positions will be paid.

      The Company believes that its capital resources and liquidity position at December 31, 2005, coupled with its planned cash flow generated from operations in 2006, are adequate to support higher capital spending, continued dividend payments, repayment of debt and to meet anticipated business needs to fund future growth opportunities, including the cash portion of the consideration for the proposed acquisition of Maytag and assumption of Maytag debt. Currently, the Company has access to capital markets in the U.S. and internationally.

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      PENDING MAYTAG ACQUISITIONRESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

       On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool entered into a definitive merger agreement with Maytag to acquire all outstanding shares of Maytag common stock. The aggregate transaction value, including the payment to Maytag stockholders of approximately $850 million in cash and between 9.2 million and 11.3 million shares of Whirlpool common stock and assumption of approximately $972 million of Maytag debt (based on Maytag stock, exercisable stock options and debt reported outstanding as of December 31, 2005), is approximately $2.7 billion. The number of shares of Whirlpool common stock to be issued will depend on the volume weighted average trading prices of Whirlpool common stock during a twenty trading day period ending shortly before completion of the merger. The transaction was approved by Maytag shareholders on December 22, 2005 and is pending regulatory clearance as discussed below.

      Whirlpool has sufficient resources to finance the acquisition. The acquisition and upcoming debt maturities of the combined company are expected to be financed initially through commercial paper supported by existing bank agreements and with new committed bank facilities. The Company expects to eventually refinance a portion of its commercial paper in the capital markets.

      Whirlpool currently expects the merger with Maytag to generate approximately $300 million to $400 million of annual pre-tax cost savings by the third year following completion of the merger. Efficiencies are expected to come from all areas across the value chain, including product manufacturing and marketing, global procurement, logistics, infrastructure and support areas. Achieving these efficiencies will require one-time costs and capital investments currently estimated to be in the range of $350 million to $500 million, a majority of which currently are anticipated to be capitalized or accrued in purchase accounting. Whirlpool currently anticipates incurring these costs during the first two years following completion of the merger.

      The merger is subject to clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, and other customary closing conditions. On December 1, 2005, Whirlpool and Maytag announced that they had certified substantial compliance with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in response to a request for additional information ("second request") and had agreed not to close the proposed merger before February 27, 2006, without the Antitrust Division's concurrence, recognizing that the Antitrust Division could request additional time for review. On February 13, 2006, Whirlpool and Maytag



      announced that they agreed with the Antitrust Division to a limited extension of time to complete the review of the proposed merger. The companies have agreed not to close the transaction before March 30, 2006 without the Antitrust Division's concurrence.

      Whirlpool and Maytag are working closely with the Department of Justice and continue to cooperate fully with its investigation and respond promptly to its inquiries.

      On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool paid Maytag $40 million to reimburse Maytag for its payment of a fee to terminate its prior merger agreement with Triton Acquisition Holding Co. Whirlpool has agreed to pay up to $15 million to assist Maytag in retaining key employees while the merger is pending. Whirlpool also has agreed to pay Maytag a "reverse break-up fee" of $120 million under certain circumstances if the transaction cannot be closed due to an inability to obtain regulatory clearance.

      OTHER MATTERS

       On February 25, 2005, the Company announced the recall of approximately 162,000 under-the-counter plastic tall tub dishwashers due to a potential safety issue. There have been no reports of personal injury or property damage associated with these dishwashers. The Company also is undertaking the repair of up to an additional 223,000 of these dishwashers for a separate quality issue. The Company accrued $17.1 million related to the quality issues within cost of products sold during the fourth quarter of 2004. During 2005, the estimated cost to recall and repair these units was reduced to $13.7 million primarily due to the recovery of certain costs from a parts supplier. The remaining accrual amount for cost and a receivable from the supplier were not material at December 31, 2005.

      Two purported class action lawsuits have been filed against the Company, one in a Missouri state court and one in an Illinois state court, each alleging breach of warranty, fraud, and violation of state consumer protection acts in selling tall tub dishwashers. There are no allegations of any personal injury or property damage and the complaints seek unspecified compensatory damages. The Company believes these suits are without merit, intends to vigorously defend these actions, and at this point cannot reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any.

      Whirlpool is currently monitoring a supplier-related quality and potential product safety problem that may affect up to 3.5 million appliances manufactured between 2000 and 2002. Whirlpool currently estimates that its potential cost from this matter ranges from zero to $235 million, depending on whether the cost of any such corrective action is borne initially by Whirlpool or the supplier, and, if initially borne by Whirlpool, whether Whirlpool will be successful in recovering its costs from the supplier. In addition, Whirlpool could incur other costs arising out of this matter, which cannot currently be estimated but could be material. No amounts have been recognized as of December 31, 2005.

      In 2003, the Company recognized pre-tax charges of $16 million primarily for final expenses related to the 2001 recall of microwave oven hood units.

      Pension and Postretirement Medical Benefit Plans

       Whirlpool also contributed approximately $15 million to its U.S. pension plans during 2005, of which $13 million was a voluntary contribution to its funded plans and $2 million was required. The Company also contributed $25 million to its foreign pension plans during 2005. At December 31, 2005, the Company's defined benefit pension plans still remain underfunded on a combined basis. For the obligations and funded status of the U.S. and foreign plans, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



      The Company recognized consolidated pre-tax pension cost of $94 million, $91 million and $78 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Consolidated pension cost in 2006 is anticipated to be approximately $95 million, relatively unchanged from 2005. The Company currently expects that U.S. pension costs for 2006 will be approximately $72 million, using an expected rate of return on assets assumption of 8.5% and a discount rate of 5.6%. The $72 million compares to pension cost of $66 million in 2005.

      U.S. pension plans comprise 86% of the Company's projected benefit obligation. The discount rate and expected return on asset assumptions used in determining the Company's U.S. pension benefit obligations and costs are as follows:

       
       Weighted-average
      discount rate

       Expected return
      on assets

      Benefit obligation — December 31    
       2005 5.60%N/A
       2004 5.80%N/A

      Pension cost

       

       

       

       
       2006 5.60%8.50%
       2005 5.80%8.75%
       2004 6.00%8.75%

      The Company's expected return on assets assumption of 8.5% was based on historical asset returns for publicly traded equity and fixed income securities tracked between 1926 and 2005 and the historical returns for private equity. The historical equity returns were adjusted downward to reflect future expectations. This adjustment was based on published academic research. The expected returns are weighted by the targeted asset allocations. The resulting weighted average return was rounded to the nearest quarter of one percent. The Company uses a measurement date of December 31.

      On November 14, 2005, the Company amended the Whirlpool Employees Pension Plan (the "WEPP"). The amendment will be reflected in the Company's 2006 pension cost and did not affect the accumulated benefit obligation (the "ABO") or projected benefit obligation (the "PBO") at December 31, 2005.

      In January 2005, the Company amended the WEPP. The Company remeasured the net periodic cost and funded status of the plan at January 1, 2005 to reflect the amendment. The amendment reduced the PBO by approximately $80 million. The ABO was not affected by the amendment since the accrued benefits as of December 31, 2005 were not affected by this change. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

      In addition to pension plans, the Company sponsors plans to provide postretirement health care benefits for eligible retired U.S. employees. Eligible retirees are those who were full-time employees with 10 years of service who attained age 55 while in service with the Company. The postretirement health care plans are generally contributory with participants' contributions adjusted annually and include cost-sharing provisions that limit the Company's exposure for recent and future retirees. The plans are unfunded. The Company has reserved the right to modify the benefits. In June 2003, the Company announced a modification to its U.S. retiree health care plans that affects certain future and current retirees and is based on a Retiree Healthcare Savings Account ("RHSA"), where notional accounts are established for eligible active U.S. paid employees. The accounts reflect each year of service beginning at age 40 and is designed to provide employees who retire after December 31, 2003 from Whirlpool with credits to apply towards health care premiums. In June 2003, the Company recorded a one-time curtailment gain of $13.5 million, net of tax, related to the modification of its retiree health care plan. The Company provides no significant postretirement medical benefits to non-U.S. employees.


      At December 31, 2004 and 2005, discount rates were determined individually for each of its pension plans and the post-retirement plan based on the yield of AA rated non-callable (or callable with make whole provisions) bonds.

      In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the "Act") was enacted. The Act established a prescription drug benefit program under Medicare, known as Part D, and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Part D. In 2004, the Company measured the effects of the Act following the guidance in FASB Staff Position ("FSP") 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003." For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company reflected the estimated federal subsidy under the Act as an actuarial gain as required by FSP 106-2, which caused the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation to decrease by $104 million, and reduced the cost recognized by approximately $15 million.


      Legal Proceedings

      The Company is currently a defendant in 11 purported class action lawsuits in 11 states related to its Calypso clothes washing machine. Two of the original purported class actions have been dismissed. The complaints in these lawsuits generally allege violations of state consumer fraud acts, unjust enrichment, and breach of warranty based on the allegations that the washing machines have various defects. There are no allegations of any personal injury, catastrophic property damage, or safety risk. The complaints generally seek unspecified compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages. The Company believes these suits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend these actions. At this point, the Company cannot reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any.

      In early 2004, Maytag filed a lawsuit against the Company for patent infringement. The suit seeks unspecified damages and an injunction against the continued production or sale of the alleged infringed patented product. The Company believes this suit is without merit, and at this point cannot reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any. The suit has been stayed pending the outcome of the pending Maytag acquisition.

      In 1989, a Brazilian affiliate (now a subsidiary) of the Company brought an action against a financial institution in Brazil seeking a "Declaration of Non-Enforceability of Obligations" relating to loan documentation entered into without authority by a senior officer of the affiliate. In September 2000, a decision in the declaratory action adverse to the Company became final. In 2001, the financial institution began a collection action, and the Company responded with a counterclaim. The lower court dismissed the counterclaim in 2002 and the Superior Court confirmed the lower court decision in December 2005. The Company provided for the potential exposure resulting from this litigation during 2005.

      The Company is involved in various other legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Management, after taking into consideration legal counsel's evaluation of such actions, is of the opinion that the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

      Other

      The Brazilian Constitution provides the basis for tax credits on purchases of raw materials used in production. The credit applies to purchases of raw materials that are tax exempt or have a zero tax rate. Several court decisions supported that tax credit and, during 2003 and 2004, the Company calculated tax credits under this provision. The original amount recorded as tax credits is approximately $22 million. The recorded tax credits are currently being challenged in Brazilian courts. At this point, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential impact, if any, to its consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. No tax credits were recorded in 2005.

      CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

       Management has evaluated theThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting policies usedprinciples in the preparation ofU.S. (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. We periodically evaluate these estimates and assumptions, which are based on historical experience, changes in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statementsbusiness environment and related notes andother factors that management believes those policies to be reasonable and appropriate. The Company's accounting policies are described in Note 1 tounder the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain ofcircumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company's critical accounting policies include the following:

      Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

      Accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits involves estimating the costs of future benefits and attributing the cost over the employee'semployee’s expected period of employment with the Company.employment. The determination of the Company'sour obligation and expense for



      these costs requires the use of certain assumptions. Those assumptions are included in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and include, among others,other assumptions, the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and health care cost trend rates. These assumptions are subject to change based on interest rates on high quality bonds, stock and bond markets and medical cost inflation, respectively. As permitted by GAAP, actual results that differ from the Company'sour assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore, generally affect itsour recognized expense and accrued liability in such future periods. While the Company believeswe believe that itsour assumptions are appropriate given current economic conditions and its actual experience, significant differences in results or significant changes in the Company'sour assumptions may materially affect itsour pension and other postretirement obligations and related future expense. As required by Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS"(“SFAS”) No. 87, SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003)106 and SFAS No. 106, Whirlpool's132 (R) as amended by SFAS No. 158, our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 20052007 and preliminary retirement benefit costs for the 20062008 fiscal year were prepared using the assumptions that were determined atas of December 31, 2005.2007. The following table highlightssummarizes the sensitivity of Whirlpool'sour December 31, 20052007 retirement obligations and 20062008 retirement benefit costs of itsour U.S. plans to changes in the key assumptions used to determine those results:

      Millions of dollars

      Change in assumption

       Estimated increase
      (decrease) in 2008
      pension cost
        Estimated increase
      (decrease) in
      Projected Benefit
      Obligation for the
      year ended December 31,
      2007
        Estimated increase
      (decrease) in 2008
      Other
      Postretirement
      Benefits cost
        Estimated increase
      (decrease) in Other
      Postretirement Benefit
      Obligation for the
      year ended December 31,
      2007
       

      0.25% increase in discount rate

       $(5.0) $(117.0) $(1.1) $(26.5)
                      

      0.25% decrease in discount rate

        4.8   121.1   2.2   27.2 
                      

      0.25% increase in long-term return on assets

        (7.2)         
                      

      0.25% decrease in long-term return on assets

        7.2          
                      

      0.50% increase in discount rate

        (10.2)  (230.0)  (0.8)  (52.4)
                      

      0.50% decrease in discount rate

        9.7   246.4   4.3   55.0 
                      

      0.50% increase in long-term return on assets

        (14.5)         
                      

      0.50% decrease in long-term return on assets

        14.5          
                      

      1.00% increase in medical trend rates

              13.3   84.2 
                      

      1.00% decrease in medical trend rates

              (6.9)  (75.2)
                      

      Millions of dollarsMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      Change in assumption
       Estimated increase
      (decrease) in 2006
      pension cost

       Estimated increase
      (decrease) in
      Projected Benefit
      Obligation for the
      year ended
      December 31, 2005

       Estimated increase
      (decrease) in 2006
      Other
      Postretirement
      Benefits cost

       Estimated increase
      (decrease) in Other
      Postretirement Benefit
      Obligation for the
      year ended
      December 31, 2005

       
      0.25% increase in discount rate $(6.1)$(58.2)$(1.1)$(16.6)
        
       
       
       
       
      0.25% decrease in discount rate $6.1 $59.9 $1.1 $17.1 
        
       
       
       
       
      0.25% increase in long-term return on assets $(4.2) N/A  N/A  N/A 
        
       
       
       
       
      0.25% decrease in long-term return on assets $4.2  N/A  N/A  N/A 
        
       
       
       
       
      0.50% increase in discount rate $(12.1)$(114.8)$(2.3)$(32.8)
        
       
       
       
       
      0.50% decrease in discount rate $12.3 $121.7 $2.3 $34.6 
        
       
       
       
       
      0.50% increase in long-term return on assets $(8.5) N/A  N/A  N/A 
        
       
       
       
       
      0.50% decrease in long-term return on assets $8.5  N/A  N/A  N/A 
        
       
       
       
       

      The analysis is an estimate only. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      These sensitivities may not be appropriate to use for other years'years’ financial results. Furthermore, the impact of assumption changes outside of the ranges shown above may not be approximated by using the above results.

      Income Taxes — As part For additional information about our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, see Note 14 of the process of preparing itsNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company estimates itsStatements.

      Income Taxes

      We estimate our income taxes in each of the taxing jurisdictions in which it operates.we operate. This process involves estimating actual current tax expense together with assessing any temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of certain items, such as the timing for recognizing expenses, for tax and accounting purposes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting“Accounting for Income Taxes." These differences may result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company'sour Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company isWe are required to assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets, which include net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences, that are expected to be deductible in future years, will be recoverable.years. Realization of the Company'sour net operating loss deferred tax assets is supported by specific



      tax strategies and considerconsiders planned projections of future profitability. If recovery is not likely, the Company provideswe provide a valuation allowance based on its estimates of future taxable income in the various taxing jurisdictions, and the amount of deferred taxes that are ultimately realizable. If future taxable income wasis lower than expected or if tax-planning strategies wereare not available as anticipated, the Companywe may record additional valuation allowances through income tax expense in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if the Company determineswe determine that it would bewe are able to realize itsour deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amounts, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset wouldwill increase income in the period such determination is made. As of December 31, 20052007 and 2004, the Company2006, we had total deferred tax assets of $923$1,658 million and $885$1,633 million, respectively, net of valuation allowances of $114$72 million and $105$135 million, respectively (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company'srespectively. Our effective tax rate has ranged from 28.6%14.5% to 46.2%35% over the past five years and has been influenced by tax credits, audit settlements and adjustments, tax planning strategies, enacted legislation, and dispersion of global income. A 1% increase in the Company'sour effective tax rate would have decreased 20052007 earnings by approximately $6$8 million. Future changes in the effective tax rate will be subject to several factors, including enacted laws, tax planning strategies, and business profitability.

      In addition, the Company operateswe operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and isare subject to audit in these jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time to resolve. In the opinion of management, adequate provisions forFor additional information about income taxes, have been made for all years.see Notes 1 and 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Befiex Credits

      Our Brazilian operations earned tax credits under the Brazilian government’s export incentive program. These credits reduce Brazilian federal excise taxes on domestic sales, resulting in an increase in the operations’ recorded net sales. Based on a recalculation of available credits and a favorable court decision in the fourth quarter of 2005, we recognized approximately $23 million of export credits in 2005. During 2007 and 2006, we were able to recognize approximately $131 million and $52 million of export credits respectively. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $839 million of export credits remain. We recognize credits as they are monetized.

      Product RecallRecalls

      The establishment of a liability for product recall expensesrecalls is occasionallyperiodically required and is impacted by several factors such as customer response rate, consumer options, field repair costs, inventory repair costs, extended warranty costs, communication structure and other miscellaneous costs such as legal, logistics and consulting. The customer response rate, which represents an estimate of the total number of units to be serviced as a percentage of the total number of units affected by the recall, is the most significant factor in estimating the total cost of each recall. This rate reflects several factors, including the type of product, the year manufactured, age of the product

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      sold and current and past experience factors. Significant differencesDifferences between the Company'sour assumptions and its actual experience or significant changes in its assumptions could have a material impact on the Company'sour product recall reserves.

      Befiex Credits — As discussed above, prior to 2005, the Company's Brazilian operations had recognized tax credits under Befiex, which reduces Brazilian federal excise taxes on domestic sales, resulting in an increase in the operations' recorded net sales. Based on a recalculation of available credits and a favorable court decision in the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company recognized approximately $23 million of export credits in December 2005 that is expected to be monetized by the end For additional information about product recalls, see Note 8 of the first quarter of 2006.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Warranty Obligations

      Warranty ObligationsThe estimation of warranty obligations is determined in the same period that revenue from the sale of the related products is recognized. The warranty obligation is based on historical experience and reflects management'sour best estimate of expected costs at the time products are sold. Warranty accruals are adjusted for known or anticipated warranty claims as new information becomes available. Future events and circumstances could materially change the Company'sour estimates and require adjustments to the warranty obligation.obligations. New product launches require a greater use of judgment in developing estimates until historical experience becomes available. SeeFor additional information about warranty obligations, see Note 78 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.

      Goodwill and Intangibles Valuations

      We sell products under a number of brand names, many of which we developed. Brand development costs are expensed as incurred. We also purchase brand intangible assets and goodwill in acquisitions. Upon acquisition, the purchase price is first allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including brand intangible assets, based on estimated fair value, with any remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill.

      Brand names and goodwill are considered indefinite lived intangible assets and as such are not amortized. Indefinite lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment at least annually. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, as determined by discounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess. Goodwill is evaluated using a summarytwo-step impairment test at the reporting unit level. The first step of the activitygoodwill impairment test compares the book value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, with its fair value, as determined by its discounted cash flows. If the book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we perform the second step to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recorded. In the second step, we determine an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The amount of impairment loss is equal to the excess of the book value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill.

      We determine fair value using accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and macroeconomic changes and to estimate future cash flows. Assumptions used in our impairment evaluations, such as forecasted growth rates and our cost of capital, are based on the Company's product warranty accounts for 2005best available market information and 2004.are consistent with our internal forecasts and operating plans. These assumptions could be adversely impacted by certain of the risks discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. For additional information about intangible assets and goodwill, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

      In December 2004,2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (R)141(R), "Share-Based Payments."“Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 123 (R)141(R) requires us to continue to follow the Company to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expenseguidance in its consolidated financial



      statements. SFAS No. 123 (R) was originally141 for certain aspects of business combinations, with additional guidance provided defining the acquirer, recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, assets and liabilities arising from contingencies, defining a bargain purchase and recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase. This statement is effective for periodsall business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after JuneDecember 15, 2005; however, in April 2005, the SEC changed the effective date of2008. We will implement SFAS No. 123 (R)141(R) for any business combinations occurring at or subsequent to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 for non-small business issuers. SFAS No. 123 (R) provides alternative methods of adoption, which include a modified prospective application and a modified retroactive application. On January 1, 2006, the Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (R) and will apply the modified prospective method that requires entities to recognize compensation costs in financial statements issued after the date of adoption for all share-based payments granted, modified or settled after the date of adoption as well as for any awards that were granted and unvested prior to the adoption date. The adoption of FAS 123 (R) is expected to result in additional pre-tax expense of approximately $7 million in 2006.2009.

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      In November 2004,December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs,160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,” an Amendment of ARB No. 43 Chapter 4."51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 with retrospective application. We will implement SFAS No. 151 requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight,160 beginning January 1, 2009 and rehandling be recognized as current-period charges rather than being included in inventory, regardless of whetherare currently evaluating the costs meet the criterion of abnormal as defined in ARB 43. SFAS No. 151 is applicable for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company will adopt this standard beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and does not believe the adoption will have a materialpotential impact on the Company's results of operations orour financial position as such costs have historically been expensed as incurred.statements when implemented.

      In December 2004,September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The expanded disclosures required by this statement about the use of Non-Monetary Assets — an Amendmentfair value to measure assets and liabilities should provide users of APB Opinion No. 29,"financial statements with better information about the extent to which addressesfair value is used to measure recognized assets and liabilities, the measurementinputs used to develop the measurements, and the effect of exchangescertain of non-monetary assets.the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets) for the period. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception to fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange transactions that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of an entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods after June 15, 2005. The implementation ofwithin those fiscal years. We will implement SFAS No. 153 did157 beginning January 1, 2008 and anticipate that the statement will not have a materialmaterially impact our financial statements, but will provide expanded disclosure on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

      In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. ("FIN") 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143." FIN 47 clarifies that SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," requires that an entity recognize a liability for theour fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability's fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The implementation of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.measurements.

      In June 2005, the FASB issued FSP No. 143-1, "Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste Obligations." The FSP addresses accounting by commercial users and producers of electrical and electronic equipment, in connection with WEEE issued by the EU on February 13, 2003. This Directive requires EU-member states to adopt legislation to regulate the collection, treatment, recovery, and environmentally sound disposal of electrical and electronic waste equipment, and sets forth certain obligations relating to covering the cost of disposal of such equipment by commercial users. Producers will also be required to cover the cost of disposal of such equipment under the WEEE legislation if they are participating in the market as of August 13, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, while many EU-member states had enacted legislation, several major EU-member states were still in the drafting process. As a result, final estimates regarding the financial impact from WEEE legislation on the Company cannot be made at this time. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the WEEE legislation as EU-member states implement guidance and will account for related costs accordingly.



      MARKET RISK

      We have in place an Enterprise Risk Management process that involves systematic risk identification and mitigation covering the categories of Enterprise, Strategic, Financial, Operation and Compliance and Reporting risk. The CompanyEnterprise Risk Management process receives Board of Directors and Management oversight, drives risk mitigation decision-making and is fully integrated into our internal audit planning and execution cycle.

      We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, domestic and foreign interest rates, and commodity prices, which can affect the Company'sour operating results and overall financial condition. Whirlpool manages itsWe manage exposure to these market risks through itsour operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for speculation or for trading purposes. Derivative financial instruments are contracted with a diversified group of primarily investment grade counterparties to reduce exposure to nonperformance on such instruments. The Company's sensitivity analysis reflects the effects of changes in market risk.

      Whirlpool usesWe use foreign currency forward contracts, currency options and currency swaps to hedge the price risk associated with firmly committed and forecasted cross-border payments and receipts related to its ongoing business and operational financing activities. Foreign currency contracts are sensitive to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2005,2007, a 10% unfavorable exchange rate movement in each currency in the Company'sour portfolio of foreign currency contracts would have resulted in an incremental unrealized loss of approximately $54$80 million, while a 10% favorable shift would have resulted in an incremental unrealized gain of approximately $47$85 million. Consistent with the use of these contracts to neutralize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations, such unrealized losses or gains would be offset by corresponding gains or losses, respectively, in the remeasurementre-measurement of the underlying exposures.

      The Company entersWe enter into commodity swap contracts to hedge the price risk associated with firmly committed and forecasted commodities purchases that are not fixed directly through supply contracts. As of December 31, 2005,2007, a 10% favorable or unfavorable shift in commodity prices would have resulted in an incremental $29 million gain or a $25 million loss of approximately $18 million in the commodity swap contracts, while a 10% favorable shift would have resulted in an incremental gain of approximately $19 million.related to these contracts.

      Whirlpool utilizes

      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

      RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—(CONTINUED)

      We utilize interest rate swaps to hedge the Company'sour interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2005,2007, a 10% shift in interest rates would have resulted in an incremental $7$1.0 million gain or loss related to these contracts.

      FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

      The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by us or on behalf of the Company. Management's Discussion and Analysis and other sections of this report contain forward-looking statements that reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and financial performance.

      our behalf. Certain statements contained in this Financial Supplement,annual report, including those within the forward-looking perspective section within this Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis, and other written and oral statements made from time to time by the Companyus or on our behalf do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.facts and may contain forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. As such, they are considered "forward-looking statements"“forward-looking statements” which provide current expectations or forecasts of future events. Such statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "could," "possible," "plan," "project," "will," "forecast,"“anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “possible,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “forecast,” and similar words or expressions. The Company'sOur forward-looking statements generally relate to itsour growth strategies, financial results, product development, and sales efforts. These forward-looking statements should be considered with the understanding that such statements involve a variety of risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, and may be affected by inaccurate assumptions. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual results may vary materially.

      Forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, statements regarding expected earnings per share, cash flow, productivity and materialmaterial- and oil-related costs, as well as expectations as to the



      closing of the proposed merger with Maytag.prices. Many risks, contingencies and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from Whirlpool'sWhirlpool Corporation’s forward-looking statements. Among these factors are: (1) intense competition in the home appliance industry reflecting the impact of both new and established global competitors, including Asian and European manufacturers and the strength of trade customers;manufacturers; (2) Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s ability to continue its strong relationship with Sears Holding Corporation in North America (accounting for approximately 16%12% of Whirlpool's 2005Whirlpool’s 2007 consolidated net sales of $14$19.4 billion) and other significant trade customers, and the ability of these trade customers to maintain or increase market share; (3) industry demand, which reflects factors such as gross domestic product, consumer interest rates, consumer confidence, housing starts, saleschanges in economic conditions, including the strength of existing homesthe U.S. building industry and the level of mortgage refinancing;interest rates; (4) the ability of Whirlpool to achieve its business plans, including execution of its Maytag strategy, productivity improvements, cost control, leveraging of its global operating platform, and acceleration of the rate of innovation; (5) fluctuations in the cost of key materials (including steel, oil, plastic, resins, copper and zinc) and components and the ability of Whirlpool to offset cost increases; (6) the ability of suppliers of critical parts, components and manufacturing equipment to deliver sufficient quantities to Whirlpool in a timely and cost-effective manner; (7) changes in market conditions,our ability to attract, develop and retain executives and other qualified employees; (8) health care cost trends and pending regulationregulatory changes that could increase future funding obligations for pension and post-retirementpost retirement benefit plans; (8)(9) the cost of compliance with environmental and health and safety regulations,regulations; (10) litigation including new regulations in Europe regarding appliance disposal; (9) potential exposure to product liability claims including the outcome of Whirlpool's previously-announced investigation of a supplier-related quality and potential product safety problem that may affect up to 3.5 million appliances manufactured between 2000 and 2002; (10)defect claims; (11) the impact of labor relations; (11) Whirlpool's(12) Whirlpool’s ability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights; (12)(13) the ability of Whirlpool to manage foreign currency fluctuations; and its effective tax rate; (13)(14) global, political and/or economic uncertainty and disruptions, especially in Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s significant geographic markets,regions, including uncertainty and disruptions arising from natural disasters including possible effects of recent U.S. hurricanes or terrorist activities; and (14) risks associated with operations outside the U.S. Other such factors relate to Whirlpool's pending merger with Maytag, including (1) the ability of Whirlpool and Maytag to satisfy the conditions to closing (including regulatory approval) and the costs and consequences of not closing; (2) the effect on Maytag's business of the pending transaction; and (3) in the event the merger is completed, Whirlpool's ability to integrate the business of Maytag on a timely basis and realize the full anticipated benefits of the merger within the current estimate of costs.attacks.

      The Company undertakesWe undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, and investors are advised to review disclosures in the Company'sour filings with the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission. It is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historic results. Therefore, investors should not consider the foregoing factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks, uncertainties, or factors that could

      potentially cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning

      these and other factors can be found in "Risk Factors." See“Risk Factors” in Item 1A Risk Factors, to Part I of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.this report.


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

      INCOME

      Year Ended December 31

      (Millions of dollars, except per share data)

       
       2005
       2004
       2003
       
      Net sales $14,317 $13,220 $12,176 

      Expenses

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Cost of products sold  11,269  10,358  9,423 
      Selling, general and administrative  2,199  2,089  1,920 
      Restructuring costs  57  15  3 
        
       
       
       
      Operating profit  792  758  830 

      Other income (expense)

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Interest and sundry income (expense)  (65) (14) (41)
      Interest expense  (130) (128) (137)
        
       
       
       
       Earnings before income taxes and other items  597  616  652 
      Income taxes  171  209  228 
        
       
       
       
       Earnings before equity earnings and minority interests  426  407 ��424 
      Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  1  (1)  
      Minority interests  (5)   (10)
        
       
       
       
      Net earnings $422 $406 $414 
        
       
       
       

      Per share of common stock

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Basic net earnings $6.30 $6.02 $6.03 
        
       
       
       
      Diluted net earnings $6.19 $5.90 $5.91 
        
       
       
       
      Dividends $1.72 $1.72 $1.36 

      Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions):

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Basic  67.1  67.4  68.7 
      Diluted  68.3  68.9  70.1 

      See Notes to

         2007  2006  2005 

      Net sales

        $19,408  $18,080  $14,317 

      Expenses

          

      Cost of products sold

         16,517   15,420   12,123 

      Selling, general and administrative (exclusive of intangible amortization)

         1,736   1,752   1,343 

      Intangible amortization

         31   30   2 

      Restructuring costs

         61   55   57 
                   

      Operating profit

         1,063   823   792 

      Other income (expense)

          

      Interest and sundry income (expense)

         (63)  (2)  (65)

      Interest expense

         (203)  (202)  (130)

      Gain on sale of investment

         7       
                   

      Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and other items

         804   619   597 

      Income taxes

         117   126   171 
                   

      Earnings from continuing operations before equity earnings and minority interests

         687   493   426 

      Equity in (loss) income of affiliated companies

         (18)  1   1 

      Minority interests

         (22)  (8)  (5)
                   

      Earnings from continuing operations

         647   486   422 

      Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $3 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

         (7)  (53)   
                   

      Net earnings available to common stockholders

        $640  $433  $422 
                   

      Per share of common stock

          

      Basic earnings from continuing operations

        $8.24  $6.47  $6.30 

      Discontinued operations, net of tax

         (0.09)  (0.71)   
                   

      Basic net earnings

        $8.15  $5.76  $6.30 
                   

      Diluted earnings from continuing operations

        $8.10  $6.35  $6.19 

      Discontinued operations, net of tax

         (0.09)  (0.68)   
                   

      Diluted net earnings

        $8.01  $5.67  $6.19 
                   

      Dividends

        $1.72  $1.72  $1.72 
                   

      Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions)

          

      Basic

         78.5   75.1   67.1 

      Diluted

         79.9   76.5   68.3 

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

      (Millions of dollars)

       
       December 31
       
       
       2005
       2004
       
      ASSETS       
      Current Assets       
      Cash and equivalents $524 $243 
      Trade receivables, less allowances (2005: $76; 2004: $107)  2,081  2,032 
      Inventories  1,591  1,701 
      Prepaid expenses  95  74 
      Deferred income taxes  134  189 
      Other current assets  285  275 
        
       
       
      Total Current Assets  4,710  4,514 
        
       
       
      Other Assets       
      Investment in affiliated companies  28  16 
      Goodwill  169  168 
      Other intangibles, net  115  108 
      Deferred income taxes  472  323 
      Prepaid pension costs    329 
      Other assets  243  140 
        
       
       
         1,027  1,084 
        
       
       
      Property, Plant and Equipment       
      Land  80  91 
      Buildings  1,033  1,073 
      Machinery and equipment  6,108  5,933 
      Accumulated depreciation  (4,710) (4,514)
        
       
       
         2,511  2,583 
        
       
       
      Total Assets $8,248 $8,181 
        
       
       
      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY       
      Current Liabilities       
      Notes payable $131 $244 
      Accounts payable  2,330  2,297 
      Employee compensation  352  300 
      Deferred income taxes  61  57 
      Accrued expenses  880  811 
      Restructuring costs  19  13 
      Income taxes  18  110 
      Other current liabilities  145  146 
      Current maturities of long-term debt  365  7 
        
       
       
      Total Current Liabilities  4,301  3,985 
        
       
       
      Other Liabilities       
      Deferred income taxes  167  240 
      Pension benefits  467  367 
      Postemployment benefits  511  499 
      Other liabilities  220  256 
      Long-term debt  745  1,160 
        
       
       
         2,110  2,522 
        
       
       
      Minority Interests  92  68 

      Stockholders' Equity

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Common stock, $1 par value:  92  90 
       Authorized—250 million shares       
       Issued—92 million shares (2005); 90 million shares (2004)       
       Outstanding—68 million shares (2005); 67 million shares (2004)       
      Paid-in capital  863  737 
      Retained earnings  2,902  2,596 
      Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (862) (601)
      Treasury stock—24 million shares (2005); 23 million shares (2004)  (1,250) (1,216)
        
       
       
      Total Stockholders' Equity  1,745  1,606 
        
       
       
      Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $8,248 $8,181 
        
       
       

      See Notes to

         December 31,
      2007
        December 31,
      2006
       

      Assets

         

      Current assets

         

      Cash and equivalents

        $201  $262 

      Accounts receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $83 and $84 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively

         2,604   2,676 

      Inventories

         2,665   2,348 

      Prepaid expenses

         89   95 

      Deferred income taxes

         324   372 

      Other current assets

         672   524 

      Assets of discontinued operations

            240 
               

      Total current assets

         6,555   6,517 
               

      Other assets

         

      Goodwill, net

         1,760   1,663 

      Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $64 and $33 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively

         1,854   1,871 

      Other assets

         628   551 
               

      Total other assets

         4,242   4,085 
               

      Property, plant and equipment

         

      Land

         84   94 

      Buildings

         1,226   1,174 

      Machinery and equipment

         7,861   7,186 

      Accumulated depreciation

         (5,959)  (5,297)
               

      Total property, plant and equipment

         3,212   3,157 
               

      Total assets

        $14,009  $13,759 
               

      Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

         

      Current liabilities

         

      Accounts payable

        $3,260  $2,945 

      Accrued expenses

         633   698 

      Accrued advertising and promotions

         497   550 

      Employee compensation

         444   420 

      Notes payable

         298   521 

      Current maturities of long-term debt

         127   17 

      Other current liabilities

         634   771 

      Liabilities of discontinued operations

            121 
               

      Total current liabilities

         5,893   6,043 
               

      Noncurrent liabilities

         

      Long-term debt

         1,668   1,798 

      Postretirement benefits

         1,061   1,207 

      Pension benefits

         725   838 

      Other liabilities

         682   542 
               

      Total noncurrent liabilities

         4,136   4,385 
               

      Commitments and contingencies

         

      Minority interests

         69   48 
               

      Stockholders’ equity

         

      Common stock, $1 par value, 250 million shares authorized, 103 million and 102 million shares issued at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, 76 million and 78 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively

         103   102 

      Additional paid-in capital

         1,993   1,869 

      Retained earnings

         3,703   3,205 

      Accumulated other comprehensive loss

         (270)  (643)

      Treasury stock, 27 million shares and 24 million shares at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively

         (1,618)  (1,250)
               

      Total stockholders’ equity

         3,911   3,283 
               

      Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

        $14,009  $13,759 
               

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

      Year ended December 31

      (Millions of dollars)

       
       2005
       2004
       2003
       
      Operating Activities          
      Net earnings $422 $406 $414 
      Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:          
      Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliated companies, less dividends received  (1) 1   
      (Gain) loss on disposition of assets  (39) (7) 6 
      Gain on disposition of business  (9)    
      Depreciation and amortization  442  445  427 
      Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:          
       Trade receivables  (173) (16) 4 
       Inventories  37  (266) (127)
       Accounts payable  87  253  163 
       Restructuring charges, net of cash paid  8  (33) (89)
       Taxes deferred and payable, net  (105) (18) 55 
       Accrued pension  47  6  (109)
       Accrued payroll and other compensation  79  (23) 24 
       Other—net  86  46  (24)
        
       
       
       
      Cash Provided By Operating Activities $881 $794 $744 
        
       
       
       

      Investing Activities

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Capital expenditures $(494)$(511)$(423)
      Proceeds from sale of assets  93  74  75 
      Proceeds from sale of business  48     
      Acquisitions of businesses, less cash acquired  (77) (2) (4)
        
       
       
       
      Cash Used For Investing Activities $(430)$(439)$(352)
        
       
       
       

      Financing Activities

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Net (repayments) proceeds of short-term borrowings $(124)$(37)$7 
      Proceeds of long-term debt      6 
      Repayments of long-term debt  (7) (21) (221)
      Dividends paid  (116) (116) (94)
      Purchase of treasury stock  (34) (251) (65)
      Redemption of WFC preferred stock      (33)
      Common stock issued under stock plans  102  64  65 
      Other  12  3  (10)
        
       
       
       
      Cash Used For Financing Activities $(167)$(358)$(345)
        
       
       
       
      Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Equivalents $(3)$(3)$10 
        
       
       
       
      Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents $281 $(6)$57 
      Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Year  243  249  192 
        
       
       
       
      Cash and Equivalents at End of Year $524 $243 $249 
        
       
       
       

      See Notes to

         2007  2006  2005 

      Operating activities of continuing operations

          

      Net earnings

        $640  $433  $422 

      Loss from discontinued operations

         7   53    
                   

      Earnings from continuing operations

         647   486   422 

      Adjustments to reconcile earnings from continuing operations to cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations:

          

      Equity in losses of affiliated companies, less dividends received

         18   5   2 

      Gain on disposition of assets

         (65)  (4)  (39)

      Gain on sale of investment

         (7)      

      Gain on disposition of businesses

            (32)  (9)

      Depreciation and amortization

         593   550   442 

      Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:

          

      Trade receivables

         181   50   (173)

      Inventories

         (194)  (118)  37 

      Accounts payable

         105   44   87 

      Restructuring charges, net of cash paid

         (82)  (80)  8 

      Taxes deferred and payable, net

         10   (154)  (105)

      Accrued pension

         (70)  53   47 

      Employee compensation

         (24)  25   79 

      Other

         (185)  55   86 
                   

      Cash Provided By Continuing Operating Activities

         927   880   884 
                   

      Investing activities of continuing operations

          

      Capital expenditures

         (536)  (576)  (494)

      Proceeds from sale of assets

         130   86   93 

      Proceeds from sale of businesses

            36   48 

      Proceeds from sale of Maytag adjacent businesses

         100   110    

      Purchase of minority interest shares

            (53)   

      Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

            (797)  (77)

      Other

         (25)      
                   

      Cash Used In Investing Activities of Continuing Operations

         (331)  (1,194)  (430)
                   

      Financing activities of continuing operations

          

      Net (repayments) proceeds of short-term borrowings

         (243)  381   (124)

      Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt

         3   757    

      Repayments of long-term debt

         (17)  (1,046)  (7)

      Dividends paid

         (134)  (130)  (116)

      Purchase of treasury stock

         (368)     (34)

      Common stock issued

         68   54   102 

      Other

         (5)  13   9 
                   

      Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities of Continuing Operations

         (696)  29   (170)
                   

      Cash Provided By (Used In) Discontinued Operations

          

      Operating Activities

         6   8    

      Investing Activities

            (3)   
                   

      Cash Provided By Discontinued Operations

         6   5    
                   

      Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Equivalents

         33   18   (3)
                   

      (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Equivalents

         (61)  (262)  281 

      Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Year

         262   524   243 
                   

      Cash and Equivalents at End of Year

        $201  $262  $524 
                   

      Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

          

      Cash paid for interest

        $204  $225  $137 

      Cash paid for taxes

         39   173   276 

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION


      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      Year ended December 31

      (Millions of dollars)

       
       Total
       Retained
      Earnings

       Accumulated
      Other Comprehensive
      Income (Loss)

       Treasury Stock /
      Paid-in-Capital

       Common Stock
      Balances, December 31, 2002 $739 $1,985 $(999)$(334)$87

      Comprehensive income

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       Net earnings  414  414      
       Unrealized loss on derivative instruments  (5)   (5)   
       Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $75  118    118    
       Foreign currency items, net of tax of $5  129    129    
        
                  
      Comprehensive income  656            
        
                  

      Common stock repurchased, net of reissuances

       

       

      (49

      )

       


       

       


       

       

      (49

      )

       

      Common stock issued  78      77  1
      Dividends declared on common stock  (123) (123)     
        
       
       
       
       
      Balances, December 31, 2003 $1,301 $2,276 $(757)$(306)$88
        
       
       
       
       

      Comprehensive income

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       Net earnings  406  406      
       Unrealized gain on derivative instruments  13    13    
       Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $14  (31)   (31)   
       Foreign currency items, net of tax of $14  174    174    
        
                  
      Comprehensive income  562            
        
                  

      Common stock repurchased, net of reissuances

       

       

      (251

      )

       


       

       


       

       

      (251

      )

       

      Common stock issued  80      78  2
      Dividends declared on common stock  (86) (86)     
        
       
       
       
       
      Balances, December 31, 2004 $1,606 $2,596 $(601)$(479)$90
        
       
       
       
       

      Comprehensive income

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       Net earnings  422  422      
       Unrealized gain on derivative instruments  12    12    
       Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $141  (248)   (248)   
       Foreign currency items, net of tax of $12  (25)   (25)   
        
                  
      Comprehensive income  161            
        
                  

      Common stock repurchased, net of reissuances

       

       

      (34

      )

       


       

       


       

       

      (34

      )

       

      Common stock issued  128      126  2
      Dividends declared on common stock  (116) (116)     
        
       
       
       
       
      Balances, December 31, 2005 $1,745 $2,902 $(862)$(387)$92
        
       
       
       
       

      See Notes to

        Total  Retained
      Earnings
        Accumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income (Loss)
        Treasury Stock/
      Additional Paid-

      in-Capital
        Common Stock

      Balances, December 31, 2004

       $1,606  $2,596  $(601) $(479) $90

      Comprehensive income

           

      Net earnings

        422   422         

      Other comprehensive loss (See Note 10)

        (261)     (261)     
              

      Comprehensive income

        161     
              

      Common stock repurchased, net of reissuances

        (34)        (34)  

      Common stock issued

        128         126   2

      Dividends declared on common stock

        (116)  (116)        
                         

      Balances, December 31, 2005

        1,745   2,902   (862)  (387)  92

      Comprehensive income

           

      Net earnings

        433   433         

      Other comprehensive income (See Note 10)

        333      333      
              

      Comprehensive income

        766     
              

      SFAS No. 158 transition adjustment

        (114)     (114)     

      Common stock issued

        1,016         1,006   10

      Dividends declared on common stock

        (130)  (130)        
                         

      Balances, December 31, 2006

        3,283   3,205   (643)  619   102

      Comprehensive income

           

      Net earnings

        640   640         

      Other comprehensive income (See Note 10)

        373      373      
              

      Comprehensive income

        1,013     
              

      Adoption of FIN48

        (8)  (8)        

      Common stock repurchased

        (368)        (368)  

      Common stock issued

        125         124   1

      Dividends declared on common stock

        (134)  (134)        
                         

      Balances, December 31, 2007

       $3,911  $3,703  $(270) $375  $103
                         

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements



      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      (1) SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

      Nature of OperationsGeneral Information

      Whirlpool Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is athe world’s leading global manufacturer and marketer of major home appliances. The Company manufacturesWe manufacture appliances in 12 countries under nine13 principal brand names in 4 geographic segments and marketsmarket products to distributors and retailers in more than 170 countries.

      Principles of Consolidation

      Thenearly every country around the world. Our Consolidated Financial Statements include all majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments in affiliated companies consist of a 40% voting interest in an international company engaged in the sale of major home appliances, a 30% interest in an international company engaged in the sale of extended warranty contracts and a 25% interest in an international company engaged in the sale of kitchen cabinets. These companies are accounted for by the equity method. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

      Use of Estimates

      Management isWe are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

      Revenue Recognition

      Sales are recorded when title passes to the customer. The point at which title passes is determined by the shipping terms. For the majority of the Company'sour sales, title is transferred to the customer as soon as the product isproducts are shipped. For a portion of the Company'sour sales, primarily in Europe, title is transferred to the customer upon receipt of the productproducts at the customer'scustomer’s location. Allowances for estimated returns are made on sales of certain products based on historical return rates for the products involved.

      Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

      The Company carries itsWe carry accounts receivable at their face amountssales value less an allowance for doubtful accounts. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates itswe evaluate accounts receivable and establishes theestablish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of specific customer circumstances, and credit conditions and based on athe history of write-offs and collections. The Company evaluatesWe evaluate items on an individual basis when determining accounts receivable write-offs. The Company'sOur policy is generallynot to not charge interest on trade receivables after the invoice becomes past due. A receivable is considered past due if payments have not been received within agreed upon invoice terms.

      Freight and Warehousing Costs

      FreightWe apply Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs”. This EITF requires the classification of such costs within cost of products sold, or if classified elsewhere, to be disclosed. Effective January 1, 2006, we reclassified freight and warehousing costs included infrom selling, general and administrative expensesexpense to the cost of products sold in the statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsIncome. This change was adopted to better reflect these costs being directly tied to product sales. The amounts reclassified from the selling, general and administrative expense to the cost of products sold were $800 million, $723 million and $576$854 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.2005. There was no change to net earnings as a result of this reclassification.

      Cash and Equivalents

      All highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.


      Inventories

      Inventories are stated at first-in, first-out ("FIFO"(“FIFO”) cost, except U.S. production inventories, which are stated at last-in, first-out ("LIFO"(“LIFO”) cost, and Brazilian inventories, which are stated at average cost. Costs do not exceed realizable values. See Note 6 for additional information about inventories.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Goodwill and Other Intangibles

      Goodwill and other intangible assets are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” which requires that we evaluate goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis (or whenever events occur which may indicate possible impairment). Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired.

      Definite lived intangible assets are amortized over the estimated useful life ranging from 1 to 18 years. See Note 4 for additional information about goodwill and intangible assets.

      Property, Plant and Equipment

      Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. Useful lives for buildings range from 25 to 4050 years, and for machinery and equipment range from 3 to 10 years, and computer/software range from 1 to 8 years. Assets recorded under capital leases are included inDepreciation expense for property, plant and equipment.equipment was $562 million, $520 million and $440 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

      Accounts Payable Outsourcing

      We offer our suppliers access to a payables presentment and settlement service (PPS) provided by a third party processor. This service allows our suppliers to view scheduled Whirlpool payments online, enabling them to better manage their cash flow and reduce payment processing costs. Independent of Whirlpool, the PPS provider also allows suppliers to sell their receivables to financial institutions at the sole discretion of both the supplier and the financial institution. We have no economic interest in the sale of these receivables and no direct relationship with financial institutions concerning this service. All of our obligations, including amounts due, remain to our suppliers as stated in our supplier agreements. As of December 31, 2007 approximately $13 million of our total accounts payable is available for this purpose and approximately $6 million has been sold by suppliers to participating financial institutions.

      Research and Development Costs

      Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Such costs were $421 million, $375 million and $339 million $315 millionin 2007, 2006 and $285 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Advertising Costs

      Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred.when the advertisement is first communicated. Such costs were $321 million, $316 million and $239 million $221 millionin 2007, 2006 and $170 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Contingent Tax MattersDiscontinued Operations

      The Company establishes liabilitiesWe present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of operations that have either been sold or that meet the “held for probablesale accounting” and estimable assessments by taxing authorities resulting from known tax exposures. Such amounts represent a reasonable provisioncertain other criteria as discontinued operations. See Note 3 for taxes ultimately expected to be paid, and may need to be adjusted over time as moreadditional information becomes known.about discontinued operations.

      Foreign Currency Translation

      The functional currency for the Company'sour international subsidiaries and affiliates is typically the local currency. Certain international subsidiaries primarily utilize the U.S. dollar and Euro as the functional currency.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Derivative Financial Instruments

      The Company recognizes all of itsWe use derivative instruments designated as cash flow and fair value hedges to manage our exposure to the volatility in material costs, foreign currency and interest rates on certain debt instruments. Derivative instruments are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")SFAS No. 133, "Accounting“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended.amended, which requires us to fair value our derivative instruments periodically. Changes in the fair value of hedgederivative assets or liabilities (i.e., gains or losses) are recognized depending upon the type of hedging relationship and whether a hedge has been designated. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must furtherfor hedge accounting, we designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a cash flow hedge, fair value hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.

      Cash flow hedges Changes in fair value of derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are hedges that use derivatives to offset the variability of expected future cash flows. The effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the hedged transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the unrealized gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, is recognized in interest and sundry income/expenseimmediately in current earnings during the period of change.



      Fair valueearnings. See Note 9 for additional information about hedges are hedges that mitigate the risk of changes in the fair values of assets, liabilities and certain types of firm commitments. The gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated as a fair value hedge and the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item are recognized in the same line item associated with the hedged item in current earnings during the period of the change in fair values.

      Net investment hedge designation refers to the use of derivative contracts or cash instruments to hedge the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. For those derivatives that qualify as net investment hedges, the effective portion of any unrealized gain or loss is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. Any ineffective portion of net investment hedges is recognized in interest and sundry income/expense in current earnings during the period of change.

      For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the unrealized gain or loss is recognized in interest and sundry income/expense in current earnings during the period of change.financial instruments.

      Stock-Based Employee CompensationIncome Taxes

      Stock option and incentive plans are accountedWe account for under the intrinsic value methodincome taxes in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations. The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting109, “Accounting for Stock-BasedIncome Taxes.” Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of the respective assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Judgment is required in determining and evaluating our income tax provisions. We establish provisions for income taxes when, based on the technical merits of the uncertain tax position, it is not more likely than not to be substantiated on a review by tax authorities. We evaluate and adjust these accruals in light of changing facts and circumstances. For additional information about income taxes, see Note 13.

      Stock Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure" but has not

      Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments”, using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost includes: (1) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accountingand (2) compensation cost for Stock-Based Compensation," as amended. Hadall share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the Company electedgrant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Prior to adopt the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for share based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, we recognized no compensation expense for share based compensation if the exercise price was equal to or more than the fair value of the shares at the date of the grant.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005 if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 pro-formato options granted under our stock option plans. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with share-based awards amortized over the vesting periods.

      Millions of dollars, except per share data

        Year Ended
      December 31, 2005
       

      Net earnings as reported

        $422 

      Add: Share-based employee compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of related tax effects

         15 

      Deduct: Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

         (19)
           

      Pro forma net earnings

        $418 
           

      Earnings per share:

        

      Basic—as reported

        $6.30 
           

      Basic—pro forma

        $6.23 
           

      Diluted—as reported

        $6.19 
           

      Diluted—pro forma

        $6.13 
           

      Reclassifications

      We adopted SFAS No. 158, “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” and reflected the under-funded liability with a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006. During adoption, we recorded a long-term deferred tax asset in other long term assets in the amount of $160 million which has been reclassified in the prior year to net with other long term liabilities to conform to current year presentation.

      During the first quarter of 2007, we adopted changes to our segment reporting consistent with the methodology the chief operating decision maker now uses to evaluate each segment’s operating and financial results. We previously included the financial results for our Caribbean operations and exports of certain portable appliances to Europe within our North America business segment. The results for these businesses are now being reported within the Latin America and Europe segments, respectively. In addition, we have reallocated certain costs previously included within corporate administrative expense to each of the respective regions. Regional results for 2006 and 2005 have been reclassified to reflect these changes to conform to the 2007 presentation.

      We reclassified certain other prior period amounts in our Consolidated Financial Statements to be consistent with current period presentation. The effect of these reclassifications is not material.

      New Accounting Standards

      In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) requires us to continue to follow the guidance in SFAS No. 141 for certain aspects of business combinations, with additional guidance provided defining the acquirer, recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, assets and liabilities arising from contingencies, defining a bargain purchase and recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase. This statement is effective for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008. We will implement SFAS No. 141(R) for any business combinations occurring at or subsequent to January 1, 2009.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,” an Amendment of ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 with retrospective application. We will implement SFAS No. 160 beginning January 1, 2009 and are currently evaluating the potential impact on our financial statements when implemented.

      In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The expanded disclosures in this statement about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities should provide users of financial statements with better information about the extent to which fair value is used to measure recognized assets and liabilities, the inputs used to develop the measurements, and the effect of certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets) for the period. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We implemented SFAS No. 157 beginning January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 will not impact our financial statements, but will provide expanded disclosure on our fair value measurements.

      (2) MAYTAG ACQUISITION

      On March 31, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Maytag. The results of Maytag’s operations have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning April 1, 2006.

      The purchase price for Maytag was approximately $1.9 billion, including approximately $848 million of cash and approximately 9.7 million shares of Whirlpool common stock. The purchase price also included the exchange of fully-vested Whirlpool options for fully-vested Maytag options to become exercisable, in aggregate, for an additional 1.8 million shares of Whirlpool common stock and the settlement of Maytag restricted stock and performance units for cash. The combined value of the above share-based consideration was approximately $920 million. The value of the approximately 9.7 million shares of Whirlpool common stock was determined using the average market price of the common shares for the two days prior to, through the two days after, March 29, 2006.

      We assumed Maytag’s existing debt of approximately $966 million and incurred approximately $102 million in acquisition-related expenses, which are included in the purchase price. Initially, we borrowed amounts required to fund the cash portion of the purchase price through issuances in the U.S. commercial paper market and in June 2006 refinanced a portion of this commercial paper through the issuance of long-term bonds.

      We finalized the purchase price allocation to individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on March 31, 2007. The final purchase price allocation is based on management and independent appraisers’ best estimates.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      The following table presents the final purchase price allocation as of March 31, 2006:

      Millions of dollars

         

      Current assets

        $1,352

      Assets of discontinued operations

         442

      Property, plant and equipment

         487

      Goodwill

         1,585

      Intangible assets

         1,845

      Other non-current assets

         19
          

      Total assets acquired

         5,730
          

      Current liabilities

         1,657

      Liabilities of discontinued operations

         168

      Non-current liabilities

         2,035
          

      Total liabilities assumed

         3,860
          

      Net assets acquired

        $1,870
          

      Goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, has been allocated to the North America operating segment on the basis that the cost efficiencies identified will primarily benefit this segment of the business.

      We estimate the fair value of Maytag’s identifiable intangible assets is $1,845 million. The allocation of identifiable intangible assets is as follows:

      Millions of dollars

        Estimated
      Fair Value
        Estimated
      Useful Life

      Trademarks

        $1,463  Indefinite life

      Customer relationships

         288  18 years

      Patents and non-compete agreements

         94  1 to 7 years
            

      Total intangible assets acquired

        $1,845  
            

      Identifiable intangible assets consist of trademarks, customer relationships, patents and noncompete agreements. These intangible assets, excluding trademarks, are definite lived intangible assets and are amortized over their estimated economic lives based on a number of assumptions including customer attrition rates and the life of technology and associated products.

      We have also completed the analysis of integration plans, pursuant to incurred costs associated with the elimination of duplicative manufacturing facilities and selling, general and administrative overlap. Certain reserves in the amount of $239 million were established for severance and exit costs relating to the closure of Maytag facilities including manufacturing plants, the former headquarters location and other administrative offices. Costs associated with these actions have not impacted earnings and diluted net earnings per share would behave been recognized as follows:a component of purchase accounting, resulting in a corresponding increase to recorded goodwill. These reserves are related to closed Maytag facilities in Galesburg, Illinois and Florence, South Carolina, along with the closure of the Maytag facilities mentioned above.

      Year ended December 31 (Millions of dollars, except per share data)

       2005
       2004
       2003
      Compensation cost included in earnings as
      reported (net of tax benefits)
       $15 $9 $13
      Pro-forma total fair value compensation cost
      (net of tax benefits)
       $19 $17 $25

      Net earnings:

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       As reported $422 $406 $414
       Pro-forma  418  398  402

      Basic net earnings per share:

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       As reported $6.30 $6.02 $6.03
       Pro-forma  6.23  5.90  5.86

      Diluted net earnings per share:

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       As reported $6.19 $5.90 $5.91
       Pro-forma  6.13  5.78  5.74

      Net Earnings Per Common ShareNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Diluted net earnings per share

      The following table provides pro forma results of common stock includes the dilutive effect of stock options and stock based compensation plans. Foroperations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 2004as if Maytag had been acquired as of the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma results include certain purchase accounting adjustments such as the estimated changes in depreciation and 2003, a total of approximately 576,000 options, 1,831,000 optionsamortization expense on acquired tangible and 1,803,000 options, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise prices would render them anti-dilutive.


      Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated as follows:

      Millions of dollars and shares

       2005
       2004
       2003
      Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share — net earnings $422 $406 $414
        
       
       
      Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted-average shares  67.1  67.4  68.7
      Effect of dilutive securities — stock-based compensation  1.2  1.5  1.4
        
       
       
      Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares  68.3  68.9  70.1

      Reclassifications

      Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year data to conform to the current year presentation which had no effect on net income reported for any period.


      (2) NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123 (R), "Share-Based Payments." SFAS No. 123 (R) requires the Company to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expense in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 123 (R) was originally effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005; however, in April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") changed the effective date of SFAS No. 123 (R) to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 for non-small business issuers. SFAS No. 123 (R) provides alternative methods of adoption, which include a modified prospective application and a modified retroactive application. On January 1, 2006 the Company will apply the modified prospective method which requires entities to recognize compensation costs in financial statements issued after the date of adoption for all share-based payments granted, modified or settled after the date of adoptionintangible assets as well as forinterest expense on borrowings used to finance the integration. However, pro forma results do not include any awardsanticipated cost savings or other effects of the planned integration of Maytag. Accordingly, such amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results that were granted and unvestedwould have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on the dates indicated or that may result in the future.

         Year Ended
      December 31,
       
         2006  2005 

      Net sales

        $19,097  $18,430 

      Earnings from continuing operations

         474   307 

      Net earnings

         421   267 

      Diluted net earnings per share:

         

      Earnings from continuing operations

        $5.96  $3.93 

      Loss from discontinued operations

         (0.67)  (0.51)
               

      Net earnings

        $5.29  $3.42 
               

      Certain non-recurring acquisition charges of $52 million recorded by Maytag prior to March 31, 2006, directly related to the adoption date. acquisition, including $27 million of accelerated stock compensation expense triggered by certain change in control provisions and approximately $25 million of direct transaction costs are not included in the pro forma information presented above.

      (3) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

      The adoptionfollowing businesses acquired as part of FAS 123 (R) is not expectedthe acquisition of Maytag were divested. Divesting these businesses allows us to have a material impactfocus on the Company'score appliance business.

      Amana commercial

      On September 6, 2006, we sold the Amana commercial microwave business to Aga Foodservice Inc. for approximately $49 million. Revenues and costs for this business were classified as a component of discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2006. Due to our continuing involvement with the Amana commercial microwave business as an OEM supplier, we reclassified the operating results related to Amana commercial microwave business into continuing operations during the third quarter of 2006.

      Dixie-Narco

      On October 23, 2006, we completed the sale of the Dixie-Narco vending systems business to Crane Co. for approximately $46 million. The difference between the proceeds received and the net book value of the assets recorded was an adjustment to goodwill.

      Hoover

      On January 31, 2007, we completed the sale of the Hoover floor-care business to Techtronic Industries, Co., Ltd. (“TTI”) for approximately $107 million. The difference between the proceeds received and the net book value of the assets recorded was an adjustment to goodwill.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Jade

      On April 2, 2007, we completed the sale of the Jade commercial and residential products businesses to Middleby Corporation. The difference between the proceeds received and the net book value of the assets recorded was an adjustment to goodwill.

      As part of the sale of each of the above operations, we retained certain liabilities associated with pension benefits and, in the case of Hoover, postretirement medical benefits for currently retired Hoover employees. In addition, with respect to the sale of the Dixie-Narco vending systems business, we retained certain environmental liabilities. For additional information about pension and postretirement benefits see Note 14.

      The associated results of operations, or financial position.position and cash flows related to the discontinued operations have been separately reported as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

      In November 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43 Chapter 4." SFAS No. 151 requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling be recognized as current-period charges rather than being included in inventory, regardless of whetherThe following table includes certain income statement information related to the costs meet the criterion of abnormal as defined in ARB 43. SFAS No. 151 is applicable for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position; as such costs have historically been expensed as incurred.the Hoover, Jade, and Dixie-Narco businesses:

      In December 2004,

         Year Ended
      December 31,
       

      Millions of dollars

        2007  2006 

      Net sales

        $43  $443 

      Loss before income taxes

         (10)  (79)

      Income tax benefit

         3   26 
               

      Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

        $(7) $(53)
               

      The Consolidated Balance Sheet for 2006 includes the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Non-Monetary Assets — an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29," which addresses the measurement of exchanges of non-monetary assets. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception to fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange transactions that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flowsliabilities of an entity are expectedHoover and Jade presented as discontinued operations. The assets and liabilities related to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for fiscal periods after June 15, 2005. The implementation of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

      In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. ("FIN") 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143." FIN 47 clarifies that SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," requires that an entity recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability's fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The implementation of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

      In June 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 143-1, "Accounting for Electronic Equipment Waste Obligations." The FSP addresses accountingthese businesses were sold by commercial users and producers of electrical and electronic equipment, in connection with Directive 2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment ("WEEE") issued by the European Union ("EU") on February 13, 2003. This Directive requires EU-member states to adopt legislation to regulate the collection, treatment, recovery, and environmentally sound disposal of electrical and electronic waste equipment, and sets forth certain obligations relating to covering the cost of disposal of such equipment by commercial users. Producers will also be required to cover the cost of disposal of such equipment under the WEEE legislation if they are participating in the market as of August 13, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, while many EU-member states had enacted legislation, several major EU-member states were still in the drafting process. As a result, final estimates regarding the financial impact from WEEE legislation on the Company cannot be made at2007.



      this time. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the WEEE legislation as EU-member states implement guidance and will account for related costs accordingly.

      Millions of dollars

        December 31,
      2006

      Assets

        

      Net receivables

        $83

      Inventories

         85

      Net property, plant and equipment

         67

      Other assets

         5
          

      Total assets of discontinued operations

        $240
          

      Liabilities

        

      Accounts payable

        $33

      Postretirement benefits

         38

      Other liabilities

         50
          

      Total liabilities of discontinued operations

        $121
          

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      (3)(4) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

      Goodwill

      Under SFAS No. 142, goodwillGoodwill and indefinite-livedindefinite lived intangibles are no longer amortized and are subject to an annual impairment analysis performed during the fourth quarter of each year. The Company determinesyear by reporting unit. We determine the fair value of each reporting unit using a discounted cash flow approach. The Company has determined itsflows. Our reporting units are:include: North America, Europe, Multibras and Embraco (which combined areis our Latin America)America reportable operating segment), and Asia. The CompanyWe performed the annual impairment tests and determined there wasis no impairment of remaining goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.any periods presented.

      The following table summarizes the net carrying amount of goodwill:

         December 31,

      Reporting Unit—Millions of dollars

            2007          2006    

      North America

        $1,755  $1,659

      Embraco

         5   4
              

      Total

        $1,760  $1,663
              

      The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:

       
       December 31
      Reporting Unit — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
      North America $165 $164
      Latin America  4  4
        
       
      Total $169 $168
        
       

      The $1 million increase in the carrying value of North Americaamounts for goodwill issince December 31, 2006 are due primarily to final purchase accounting adjustments related to the effectsacquisition of currency translationMaytag. See Note 2 for its Canadian subsidiary.additional information about the Maytag acquisition.

      Other Intangible Assets

      The following table summarizes the net carrying amountsamount of other intangibles are comprisedintangible assets:

         December 31,

      Millions of dollars

            2007          2006    

      Indefinite lived intangible assets

        $1,522  $1,516

      Definite lived intangible assets, net

         332   355
              

      Total other intangible assets, net

        $1,854  $1,871
              

      Amortization expense for each of the following:years 2008-2012 is estimated to be $29 million.

       
       December 31
      Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
      Trademarks (indefinite-lived) $51 $53
      Patents and non-compete agreements    3
      Pension related  64  52
        
       
      Total other intangible assets, net $115 $108
        
       

      The balances include trademarks acquired as part of(5) BUSINESS DISPOSITIONS

      On August 10, 2006, our Latin America region sold the Whirlpool Mexico and Polar S.A. ("Polar") acquisitionsremaining 30% interest in 2002 and intangible assets related to minimum pension liabilities (see Note 14). Accumulated amortization totaled $4 million and $3 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004. During 2005 and 2004, fully amortized intangible assets were removedan equity investment. Proceeds from the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

      (4) BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS / DISPOSITIONS

      Polar

      On June 5, 2002, the Company acquired 95%sale were approximately $31 million. A pre-tax gain of the shares of Polar, a leading major home appliance manufacturer in Poland. The results of Polar's operations have been included$30 million was recognized and classified as interest and sundry income (expense) in the Consolidated Financial Statements within the Europe operating segment since that date. The aggregate purchase price was $27 million in cash plus outstanding debt at the time of acquisition, which totaled $19 million. The


      transaction also generated $17 million in indefinite-lived intangible assets related to trademarks owned by Polar. During 2003, Whirlpool acquired the remaining 5% of the shares of Polar.

      MASAIncome.

      In September 2005, the Companywe completed the sale of itsour 93% interest in Multibras da Amazonia S.A. ("MASA"(“MASA”), an injection molding subsidiary located in Manaus, Brazil, to Flextronics Plasticos Ltda. Proceeds from the sale were $48 million, and amillion. A pre-tax gain of $9 million pre-tax gain from the sale is included in thewas recognized and classified as interest and sundry income/expense line of the Company's 2005income (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Whirlpool will continueIncome.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      (6) INVENTORIES

      December 31—Millions of dollars

            2007          2006     

      Finished products

        $2,232  $1,980 

      Work in process

         52   55 

      Raw materials

         525   448 
               
         2,809   2,483 

      Less excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost

         (144)  (135)
               

      Total inventories

        $2,665  $2,348 
               

      The increase in inventories, when compared to purchase certain products from Multibras da Amazonia S.A. The entity was notDecember 31, 2006, is driven primarily by a significant subsidiary,stronger Brazilian Real, Rupee, Euro and accordingly, pro-forma results of operations have not been provided.

      Other

      On September 30, 2003, the Company completed the sale of its interest in Wellmann to Alno, both companies being prominent German kitchen cabinet manufacturers. The sale did not have a material impactCanadian Dollar as compared to the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Company has a 25% interest in Alno after increasing its interest from 13% during 2005. The increased investment, as well asU.S. Dollar. Also contributing to the Company's interestincrease was lower U.S. appliance industry demand, additional inventory in the results of operations of Alnolaundry sector to improve availability in the Europe region and higher material costs during 2005 were not material. The Company analyzed the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. ("FIN") 46 with respect to its interest in Alno and determined that Alno did not meet the definition of a variable interest entity.2007.

      (5)  INVENTORIES

      December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
       
      Finished products $1,361 $1,410 
      Work in process  64  57 
      Raw materials  299  353 
        
       
       
         1,724  1,820 
      Less excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost  (133) (119)
        
       
       
      Total inventories $1,591 $1,701 
        
       
       

      LIFO inventories represent approximately 28%42% and 23%46% of total inventories at December 31, 20052007 and 2004,2006, respectively.

      (6)(7) FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

      Notes Payable and Debt

      The following table summarizes our debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006:

      Millions of dollars

        2007  2006

      Medium-term notes, from 5% to 9.03%, maturing from 2010 to 2015

        $298  $314

      Debentures—9.1%, maturing 2008

         125   125

      Variable rate notes, maturing through 2009

         200   200

      Senior note—8.6%, maturing 2010

         325   325

      Senior note—6.125%, maturing 2011

         299   299

      Senior note—6.5%, maturing 2016

         249   249

      Debentures—7.75%, maturing 2016

         243   243

      Other (various maturing through 2016)

         56   60
              
         1,795   1,815

      Less current maturities

         127   17
              

      Total long-term debt, net of current maturities

        $1,668  $1,798
              

      The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of our debt, including current maturities, at December 31, 2007:

      Millions of dollars

         

      2008

        $127

      2009

         205

      2010

         373

      2011

         302

      2012

         2

      Thereafter

         786
          

      Total debt

        $1,795
          

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      On December 2, 2005, the Company entered intoJune 19, 2006, we completed an Amended and Restated Long Term Five-Year Credit Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") by and among the Company, certain other borrowers, the lenders referred to therein, Citibank N.A., as administrative agent and fronting agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and ABN Amro Bank N.V., Royal Bankoffering of Scotland and Bank$750 million aggregate principal amount of America, as documentation agents,senior notes consisting of (a) $200 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due 2009 which amends and restates the Amended and Restated Long Term Credit Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004. On December 2, 2005, the partiesbear interest at a floating rate equal to the Amendedthree-month USD London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.50% per annum; (b) $300 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior notes due 2011; and Restated Credit Agreement also entered into a 364-Day Credit Agreement (the "364-Day Credit Agreement" and together with(c) $250 million aggregate principal amount of 6.500% senior notes due 2016. Initially, we borrowed amounts required to fund the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,cash portion of the "Credit Facilities").

      The Credit Facilities provide for an aggregate of $2.7 billionpurchase price in committed unsecured revolving credit facilities. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement consists of a $2.2 billion 5-year credit facility,



      which includes a $200 million letter of credit subfacility. The 364-Day Credit Agreement consists of a $500 million 364-day credit facility, which may be converted into a term loan. Borrowing capacity of $1.2 billion under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement became available on December 2, 2005. Borrowing capacity of $500 million under the 364-Day Credit Agreement and the remaining $1.0 billion under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement will become available upon clearance of the acquisition of Maytag bythrough issuances in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Borrowings under the Credit Facilities will be available to the Company and designated subsidiaries for general corporate purposes, includingU.S. commercial paper support. Subsidiary borrowings will be guaranteed bymarket. In June 2006, we refinanced a portion of this commercial paper through the Company. Interest under the Credit Facilities accrues at a variable annual rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin dependent on the Company's credit rating at the timeissuance of borrowing.long-term bonds.

      The Credit Facilities require the Company to meet certain financial tests, including a leverage ratio not greater than 3.0 to 1.0 and an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.0 to 1.0. The Credit Facilities also contain covenants which, among other things, require the Company to deliver to the lenders specified financial information, including annual and quarterly financial information, and limit the Company's ability to (or to permit any subsidiaries to), subject to various exceptions and limitations, (i) merge with other companies; (ii) create liens on its property; (iii) incur debt or off-balance sheet obligations at the subsidiary level; (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates, except on an arms-length basis; (v) enter into agreements restricting the payment of subsidiary dividends or restricting the making of loans or repayment of debt by subsidiaries to the Company or other subsidiaries; and (vi) enter into agreements restricting the creation of liens on its assets.

      At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company wasWe are in compliance with the financial covenants under these credit agreements.covenant requirements at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

      During 2005The fair value of long-term debt (including current maturities) was $1,879 million and 2004, there were no borrowings outstanding under these credit agreements.$1,893 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and was estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

      Notes Payable

      Notes payable consist of the following:

      December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
      Payable to banks $131 $244
      Commercial paper    
        
       
      Total notes payable $131 $244
        
       

      December 31—Millions of dollars

        2007  2006

      Payable to banks

        $164  $147

      Commercial paper

         134   374
              

      Total notes payable

        $298  $521
              

      Notes payable consist of short term borrowings payable to banks and commercial paper used to fund working capital requirements.

      The fair value of the Company'sour notes payable approximates the carrying amount due to the short maturity of these obligations. The weighted-average interest rate on notes payable was 4.7%5.6% and 3.5%5.1% for the years ended December 31, 20052007 and 2004,2006, respectively.

      Long-term debt consistsCredit Facilities

      We have Credit Facilities which provide a $2.2 billion 5-year credit facility and include a $100 million letter of credit subfacility. Borrowings under the following:

      December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
      Eurobonds (EUR 300 million) — 5.875% due 2006 $357 $407
      Debentures — 9.1% due 2008  125  125
      Notes — 8.6% due 2010  325  325
      Debentures — 7.75% due 2016  243  243
      Other (various interest rates with maturities through 2010)  60  67
        
       
        $1,110 $1,167
      Less current maturities  365  7
        
       
      Total long-term debt, net of current maturities $745 $1,160
        
       

      Credit Facilities are available to us and designated subsidiaries for general corporate purposes, including commercial paper support. Subsidiary borrowings under these facilities, if any, are guaranteed by us. Interest under the Credit Facilities accrues at a variable annual rate based on the LIBOR plus a margin dependent on our credit rating at that time. The Company's Euro-denominated Eurobonds mature in June 2006. The Company anticipates replacing the Eurobonds with the proceeds of a domestic bond offeringCredit Facilities require us to meet certain financial tests and commercial paper.contain specific covenants.

      Annual maturities of long-term debt in the next five years are $365 million, $9 million, $127 million, $2 million and $365 million, respectively.

      The Company paid interest on short-term and long-term debt totaling $137 million, $124 million and $137 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      The fair value of long-term debt (including current maturities) was $1,213 million and $1,315 million as ofAt December 31, 20052007 and 2004, respectively,2006, there were no borrowings outstanding under these credit agreements. We are in compliance with financial covenant requirements at December 31, 2007 and was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

      On February 7, 2006, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC, covering an indeterminate amount of debt securities.2006.

      Preferred Stock

      Although most of its assets have been divested, WFCWhirlpool Financial Corporation (“WFC”) remains a legal entity with assets consisting primarily of leveraged leases. WFC also has 17,500 shares of Series B preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 20052007 and 20042006 with a face value of $100 per share, an annual dividend of $6.55 per share and a mandatory redemption date of September 1, 2008. The preferred stock amounts are included within minority interests in the consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets and the carrying amounts approximate fair value.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      The preferred stockholders are entitled to vote together on a share-for-share basis with WFC'sWFC’s common stockholder, Whirlpool. Preferred stock dividends are payable quarterly. On September 1, 2003, WFC redeemed 331,800 shares of the Series B preferred stock at a price of $100 per share (at par). The redemption terms required the payment of any accrued unpaid dividends in addition to the applicable redemption premium, and accordingly, a total of $0.6 million was paid on September 1, 2003 related to dividends. The terms of the preferred stockholders agreement providesprovide for a final payment on September 1, 2008 (the mandatory redemption date) equal to the number of shares of Series B preferred stock outstanding multiplied by the face value of $100 per share.

      The CompanyWFC and WFCWhirlpool are parties to a support agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, if at the close of any quarter WFC'sWFC’s net earnings available for fixed charges (as defined) for the preceding twelve months is less than a stipulated amount, the Company iswe are required to make a cash payment to WFC equal to the insufficiency within 60 days of the end of the quarter. The Company wasWe were not required to make any payments under this agreement during 20052007, 2006 or 2004.2005. The support agreement may be terminated by either WFC or the Companyus upon 30 days notice provided that certain conditions are met. The Company hasWe have also agreed to maintain ownership of at least 70% of WFC'sWFC’s voting stock.

      (7)  GUARANTEES,(8) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

      Guarantees

      The Company hasWe have guarantee arrangements in place in a Brazilian subsidiary. As a standard business practice in Brazil, the subsidiary guarantees customer lines of credit at commercial banks supportingto support purchases from the Company, following its normal credit policies. If a customer were to default on its line of credit with the bank, theour subsidiary would be required to satisfy the obligation with the bank, and the receivable would revert back to the subsidiary. As ofAt December 31, 20052007 and December 31, 2004,2006, the guaranteed amounts totaled $236$331 million and $184$312 million, respectively. TheOur only recourse the Company has with respect to these arrangements would be legal or administrative collection efforts directed against the customer.


      The Company providesWe provide guarantees of indebtedness and lines of credit for various consolidated subsidiaries. The maximum amount of credit facilities available under guaranteethese lines for consolidated subsidiaries totaled $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion at both December 31, 20052007 and December 31, 2004. Outstanding credit facility amounts under guarantee2006. Our total outstanding bank indebtedness from guarantees totaled $79$115 million and $148$106 million at December 31, 20052007 and December 31, 2004,2006, respectively.

      Warranty Reserves

      Product warranty reserves are established in the same period that revenue from the sale of the related products is recognized. The amounts of those reserves are based on established terms and the Company'sour best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. We have re-evaluated the cost of a voluntary recall of certainMaytag andJenn-Airbrand dishwashers that were associated with inventory from the acquisition of Maytag. As such, we increased the warranty liability as a purchase accounting adjustment in the opening balance sheet at March 31, 2006 with a corresponding increase to recorded goodwill. This amount is included in “Acquisition” in the table below.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      The following represents a reconciliation of the changes in product warranty reserves for the periods presented:

      December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
        
      Balance at January 1 $165 $148  
      Warranties issued during the period  277  270  
      Settlements made during the period  (294) (258) 
      Other changes  1  5  
        
       
        
      Balance at December 31 $149 $165  
        
       
        

      Current portion

       

      $

      89

       

      $

      104

       

       
      Non — current portion  60  61  
        
       
        
      Total $149 $165  
        
       
        

      December 31—Millions of dollars

        2007  2006 

      Balance at January 1

        $284  $149 

      Acquisition

         53   153 

      Warranties issued during the period

         423   448 

      Settlements made during the period

         (546)  (459)

      Other changes

         12   (7)
               

      Balance at December 31

        $226  $284 
               

      Current portion

        $172  $219 

      Non-current portion

         54   65 
               

      Total

        $226  $284 
               

      Operating Lease Commitments

      At December 31, 2005, the Company2007, we had noncancelable operating lease commitments totaling $250$547 million. The annual future minimum lease payments are detailedsummarized by year in the table below.below:

      Millions of dollars

        
        
      2006 $85  
      2007  63  
      2008  49  
      2009  26  
      2010  18  
      Thereafter  9  
        
        
      Total noncancelable operating lease commitments $250  
        
        

      The Company's

      Millions of dollars

         

      2008

        $144

      2009

         114

      2010

         81

      2011

         65

      2012

         47

      Thereafter

         96
          

      Total noncancelable operating lease commitments

        $547
          

      Our rent expense was $123$183 million, $100$154 million and $84$123 million for the years 2005, 20042007, 2006 and 2003,2005, respectively.

      Purchase Obligations

      Our expected cash outflows resulting from purchase obligations are summarized by year in the table below:

      Millions of dollars

         

      2008

        $261

      2009

         196

      2010

         244

      2011

         194

      2012

         47

      Thereafter

         8
          

      Total purchase obligations

        $950
          

      Legal Contingencies

      In early 2004, Maytag filedThe Brazilian Constitution provides a lawsuitgeneral basis for recognizing tax credits on the purchase of raw materials used in production (“IPI tax credit”). Certain raw materials that are exempt or have a zero tax basis in

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      the production process qualify for these IPI tax credits. Based on legal precedent, we recognized tax credits in an aggregate amount of $33 million in 2003 and 2004. No credits were recognized in 2005 through 2007. The Brazilian tax authority has challenged the recording of IPI tax credits. Recently the Brazilian Supreme Court, which rules on a case by case basis, ruled adversely against the Company for patent infringement. The suit seeks unspecified damagesanother taxpayer in an IPI tax credit case. Our case is being defended at an administrative level. Our potential exposure ranges from zero to $74 million comprised of $33 million in taxes, $20 million in interest and an injunction against the continued production or sale of the alleged infringed patented product. The Company believes this suit is without merit, intends to vigorously defend this suit and at this point$21 million in penalties. We cannot reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any. The suit has been stayed pendingpredict the outcome of the pending Maytag acquisition.these legal proceedings. We have not accrued a liability for this exposure at December 31, 2007.


      In 1989, a Brazilian affiliate (now a subsidiary) of the Company brought an action against a financial institution in Brazil seeking a "Declaration“Declaration of Non-Enforceability of Obligations"Obligations” relating to loan documentation entered into without authority by a senior officer of the affiliate. In September 2000, aan adverse decision in the declaratory action adverse to the Company became final. In 2001, the financial institution began a collection action and the Companywe responded with a counterclaim. The lower court dismissed the counterclaim in 2002 and the Superior Court confirmed the lower court decision in December 2005. The Company has providedSuperior Court dismissed our counterclaim in 2007. The collection action remains pending. A ruling is expected in 2008 to determine the factors to be used in calculating recovery. We have accrued for the potential exposure resulting fromfor this litigation during 2005.litigation.

      The Company isWe are currently defending a defendant in 11 purportednumber of class action lawsuitssuits in 11 states related to its Calypso clothes washing machine. Two of the original purported class actions have been dismissed. The complaints in these lawsuits generally allege violations offederal and state consumer fraud acts, unjust enrichment, and breach of warranty based on the allegations that the washing machines have various defects. There are no allegations of any personal injury, catastrophic property damage, or safety risk. The complaints generally seek unspecified compensatory, consequential and punitive damages. The Company believes these suits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend these actions. At this point, the Company cannot reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any.

      Two purported national class action lawsuits have been filed against the Company, one in a Missouri state court and one in an Illinois state court, eachcourts alleging breach of warranty, fraud and violation of state consumer protection acts in selling tall tub dishwashers.acts. There are no allegations of any personal injury or property damage and the complaint seeksdamage. However, unspecified compensatory damages. The Company believesdamages are being sought. We believe these suits are without merit, intendsmerit. We intend to vigorously defend these actions, and at this point cannot reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any.actions.

      Whirlpool is currently monitoring a supplier-related quality and potential product safety problem that may affect up to 3.5 million appliances manufactured between 2000 and 2002. The Company currently estimates that its potential cost from this matter ranges from zero to $235 million, depending on whether the cost of any such corrective action is borne initially by Whirlpool or the supplier, and, if initially borne by Whirlpool, whether Whirlpool will be successful in recovering its costs from the supplier. In addition, Whirlpool could incur other costs arising out of this matter, which cannot currently be estimated but could be material.

      The Company isWe are involved in various other legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Management, after taking into consideration legal counsel'scounsel’s evaluation of such actions, is of the opinion that the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect, if any, on the Company's financial position or results of operations.our Consolidated Financial Statements.

      (8)Product Recalls

      We regularly engage in investigations of potential quality and safety issues as part of our ongoing effort to deliver quality products to customers. We are currently investigating a limited number of potential quality and safety issues. As necessary, we undertake to effect repair or replacement of appliances in the event that an investigation leads to the conclusion that such action is warranted.

      On February 1, 2007, Maytag Corporation announced a voluntary recall of approximately 2.3 millionMaytag brand andJenn-Air brand dishwashers. We estimate the cost of the recall to be $82 million and have recorded this liability in our purchase price allocation related to the acquisition of Maytag, with a corresponding increase to recorded goodwill. Of this $82 million accrual, we have $11 million remaining at December 31, 2007.

      On March 21, 2007, we announced a voluntary recall related to approximately 250,000Maytagbrand front-load washing machines. The cost of this recall will be paid by the OEM supplier.

      (9) HEDGES AND DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

      The Company isWe are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, domestic and foreign interest rates, and commodity prices. Fluctuations in these rates and prices can affect the Company'sour operating results and financial condition. The Company manages itsWe manage the exposure to these market risks through its operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company doesWe do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Using derivative markets means assuming counterparty credit risk. Counterparty credit risk relates to the loss the Companywe could incur if a counterparty defaulted on a derivative contract. The Company deals onlyWe primarily deal with investment-grade counterparties and monitors itsmonitor the overall credit risk and exposure to individual counterparties. The Company doesWe do not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparties. The amount of counterparty credit exposure is generally the unrealized gains on such derivative contracts. The Company doesWe do not require, nor does itdo we post, collateral or security on such contracts.



      The following table summarizes theour outstanding derivative contracts at December 31, 20052007 and 2004 and the exposures to which they relate:2006:

       
        
       Notional Amount in
      Millions of dollars

        
        
      Exposure

        
        
        
       Derivative
       2005
       2004
       Hedge Type
       Term
      Forecasted cross currency cash flows Foreign exchange forwards/options $1,277 $1,035 Cash flow or fair value hedge Various, up to 15 months
      Non-functional currency asset/liability Foreign exchange forwards/options $479 $580 Undesignated Various, up to 11 months
      Raw Material Purchases Commodity swaps $122 $18 Cash flow hedge Various, up to 15 months
      Floating Rate Debt Interest rate swaps $100 $100 Cash flow hedge 2006
      Fixed Rate Debt Interest rate swaps $100 $50 Fair value hedge 2008
      Anticipated Debt Issuance Interest rate swaps $200 $ Cash flow hedge 2013

            Notional Amount in
      Millions of dollars
            

      Exposure

        Derivative      2007          2006      Hedge Type  Term

      Forecasted cross currency cash flows

        Foreign exchange
      forwards/options
        $2,023  $1,313  Cash flow or fair
      value hedge
        Various, up to 28
      months

      Non-functional currency asset/liability

        Foreign exchange
      forwards/options
        $1,154  $608  Undesignated  Various, up to 9
      months

      Raw Material Purchases

        Commodity swaps  $294  $297  Cash flow or fair
      value hedge
        Various, up to 15
      months

      Raw Material Purchases

        Commodity swaps  $23  $19  Undesignated  Various, up to 11
      months

      Fixed Rate Debt

        Interest rate swaps  $100  $100  Fair value hedge  2008

      Floating Rate Debt

        Interest rate swaps  $150  $150  Cash flow hedge  2008

      Floating Rate Debt

        Interest rate swap  $50  $50  Cash flow hedge  2009

      Receivables

        Credit put  $1  $  Fair value hedge  2008

      Forecasted cross currency cash flows relate primarily to foreign currency denominated expenditures and intercompany financing agreements, royalty agreements and dividends. Non-functional currency asset and liability hedges are undesignated but relate primarily to short term payables and receivables and intercompany loans. Commodity swaps relate to raw material purchases (for example, copper and aluminum) used in the manufacturing process. Unrealized gains and losses relating to these foreign exchange forwards/options and commodity swaps were $44a loss of $3 million and a gain of $70 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

      Interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $100 million maturing in 2008 are designated and accounted for as a fair value hedge on fixed rate debt. The fair values of these contracts were a loss of $0.5 million and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2005. The unrealized gains2007 and losses for 2004 were not significant.2006, respectively.

      The Company's $100 million interestInterest rate swaps with a notional amount of $150 million maturing in 2006 is2008 are designated and is effective as a hedge of future cash payments and is treatedaccounted for as a cash flow hedge on floating rate debt. The fair values of these contracts were a loss of $2.3 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

      An interest rate swap with a notional amount of $50 million maturing in 2009 is designated and accounted for accounting purposes.as a cash flow hedge on future cash payments. The fair value of this contract iswas a loss of $2.8$0.6 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 20052007 and a loss of $6 million as of December 31, 2004.2006, respectively.

      The Company's $100 million interest rate swaps maturing in 2008 are designated and are effective as hedges of the fair value of the fixed-rate debt and are treated as fair value hedges for accounting purposes. The fair values of these contracts are a loss of $1 million as of December 31, 2005.

      The Company has designated a portion of its Euro-denominated fixed-rate debt as a hedge to protect the value of its net investments in its European subsidiaries. Translation adjustments related to this debt are not included in the income statement, but are shown in the cumulative translation adjustment account included in accumulated other comprehensive income. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recognized $29 million of net gain within the cumulative translation adjustment related to this net investment hedge.

      During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company's gainsGains and losses related to the ineffective portion of itsour hedging instruments were immaterial. The Company did not recognize any material gains or losses duringimmaterial for the years ended December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 2004 for cash flow hedges that were discontinued because the forecasted transaction was not probable to occur.2005.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      The amount of unrealized gainsgain on derivative instruments included in other comprehensive income related to contracts maturing, and expected to be realized during 20062008 is approximately $42$2 million at December 31, 2005.2007.

      (9)  STOCKHOLDERS'(10) STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      The Company'sRepurchase Program

      In June 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program of up to $500 million on June 15, 2004.million. The share repurchases are made from time to time on the open market as conditions


      warrant. Share repurchases authorized from the $500During 2007, we repurchased 3.8 million share repurchase program occurred in 2005 and 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company repurchased 530,100 shares of Whirlpool common stock in the open market at an aggregate purchase price of $34$368 million. DuringThere were no repurchases made in 2006. The remaining authorization under the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company repurchased 20,000 shares of Whirlpool common stock in the open market at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1program is $97 million.

      During 2004, the Company concluded the share repurchase programs approved by the Company's Board of Directors on March 1, 1999 ($250 million) and February 15, 2000 ($750 million). The Company repurchased 17.4 million shares at a cost of $1 billion, of which 0.7 million shares were purchased in 2002, 1.0 million shares were purchased in 2003 and 3.7 million shares were purchased in 2004. The 2004 shares were purchased in the open market at an average cost of $68.39 per share. The 2003 shares were purchased from the Company's U.S. pension plans at an average cost of $67.24 per share, which was based upon an average of the high and low market prices on the date of purchase.

      In addition to itsour common stock, the Company haswe have 10 million authorized shares of preferred stock (par value $1 per share), none of which is outstanding.

      AccumulatedComprehensive Income

      Comprehensive income primarily includes (1) our reported net earnings, (2) changes in our additional minimum pension liability (prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158), (3) changes in our unrecognized pension liability (post adoption of SFAS No. 158), (4) foreign currency translation, (5) changes in the effective portion of our open derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges and (6) changes in fair value of our available for sale securities.

      The following table shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss,income at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and the activity for the years then ended:

      Millions of dollars

        Additional
      Minimum
      Pension
      Liability
        Unrecognized
      Pension
      Liability
        Foreign
      Currency
        Derivative
      Instruments
        Marketable
      Securities
        Total 

      Balance at December 31, 2004

        $(69) $  $(520) $(12) $  $(601)
                               

      Additional minimum pension liability adjustments

         (389)              (389)

      Unrealized (loss) gain

               (37)  12      (25)

      Tax effect

         141      12         153 
                               

      Net of tax

         (248)     (25)  12      (261)
                               

      Balance at December 31, 2005

         (317)     (545)        (862)
                               

      Additional minimum pension liability adjustments

         194               194 

      Unrealized gain

               173   52      225 

      Tax effect

         (78)     (4)  (4)     (86)
                               

      Net of tax

         116      169   48      333 

      Adoption of SFAS 158, net

         201   (315)           (114)
                               

      Balance at December 31, 2006

            (315)  (376)  48      (643)
                               

      Unrealized gain (loss)

               309   (69)  17   257 

      SFAS 158

            225            225 

      Tax effect

            (79)  (34)  4      (109)
                               

      Net of tax

            146   275   (65)  17   373 
                               

      Balance at December 31, 2007

        $  $(169) $(101) $(17) $17  $(270)
                               

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Net Earnings per Share

      Diluted net earnings per share of tax, consists of:common stock include the dilutive effect of stock options and other share-based compensation plans. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, a total of approximately 1,709,000 options, 2,021,000 options and 576,000 options, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise prices would render them anti-dilutive.

      Millions of dollars
       2005
       2004
        
        
      Foreign currency translation adjustments $(545)$(520)   
      Derivative financial instruments    (12)   
      Minimum pension liability adjustments  (317) (69)   
        
       
          
      Total $(862)$(601)   
        
       
          

      Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were calculated as follows:

      Millions of dollars and shares

        2007  2006  2005

      Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share—earnings from continuing operations

        $647  $486  $422
                  

      Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted-average shares

         78.5   75.1   67.1

      Effect of dilutive securities—share-based compensation

         1.4   1.4   1.2
                  

      Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted-average shares

         79.9   76.5   68.3
                  

      Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

      One Preferred Stock Purchase Right ("Rights"(“Rights”) is outstanding for each share of common stock. The Rights, which expire May 22, 2008, will become exercisable 10 days after a person or group (an "Acquiring Person"“Acquiring Person”) has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding common stock (the "Trigger Date"“Trigger Date”) or 10 business days after the commencement, or public disclosure of an intention to commence, a tender offer or exchange offer by a person that could result in beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding common stock. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of a Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series B, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company at a price of $300 per one one-thousandth of a Preferred Share subject to adjustment.

      If a person becomes an Acquiring Person, proper provision shall be made so that each holder of a Right, other than Rights that are or were beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person (which will thereafter be void), shall thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of such Right that number of shares of common stock (or other securities) having at the time of such transaction a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right. If a person becomes an Acquiring Person and the CompanyWhirlpool is involved in a merger or other business combination transaction where the CompanyWhirlpool is not the surviving corporation or where common stock is changed or exchanged or in a transaction or transactions in which 50% or more of itsour consolidated assets or earning power are sold, proper provision shall be made so that each holder of a Right (other than such Acquiring Person) shall thereafter have the right to receive, upon the exercise thereof at the then current exercise price of the Right, that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of such transaction would have a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right. In addition, if an Acquiring Person does not have beneficial ownership of 50% or more of the common stock, the Company'sour Board of Directors has the option of exchanging all or part



      of the Rights for an equal number of shares of common stock in the manner described in the Rights Agreement.

      Prior to the Trigger Date, theour Board of Directors of the Company may redeem the Rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.01 per Right, payable in cash, shares of common stock or any other consideration deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. Immediately upon action of the Board of Directors ordering redemption of the Rights, the ability of holders to exercise the Rights will terminate and such holders will only be able to receive the redemption price.

      Until such time as the Rights become exercisable, the Rights have no voting or dividend privileges and are attached to, and do not trade separately from, the common stock.

      The Company covenants and agrees that it will cause to be reserved

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      We reserve and keep available at all times a sufficient number of shares of Preferred Stock (and following the occurrence of a Triggering Event, shares of common stock and/or other securities) to permit the exercise in full of all Rights from time to time outstanding.

      (10)Whirlpool Latin America

      In April 2006, we reorganized the Latin America business by merging Empresa Brasileira de Compressores S.A. into Multibras S.A. Eletrodomésticos and created two independent business units (“Embraco’s Compressor and Cooling Solutions Business Unit” and “Home Appliances Business Unit”). We changed the corporate name of Multibras to Whirlpool S.A. The reorganization received shareholder and regulatory approvals. The total cost to purchase shares from minority shareholders was approximately $53 million. The remaining minority shareholder ownership is now under 2%.

      (11) STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLANS

       StockWe sponsor several share-based employee incentive plans. Share-based compensation expense for grants awarded under these plans was $40 million, $37 million and $24 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Related income tax benefits recognized in earnings were $15 million, $14 million and $9 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005.

      Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option and incentive plans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,"RSU awards as of December 31, 2007 and related Interpretations. Generally, no compensation expenseDecember 31, 2006 totaled $54 million and $61 million, respectively. The cost of these non-vested awards is recognized over the estimated requisite service period. The weighted-average remaining vesting period of the non-vested awards is approximately 20 months.

      Share-Based Employee Incentive Plans

      On April 17, 2007, our shareholders approved the 2007 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (“2007 OSIP”). This plan was previously adopted by our Board of Directors on February 20, 2007 and provides for the issuance of stock options, performance stock units, performance shares, restricted stock and restricted stock equivalents with terms of no more than 10 years. We have reserved 3,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance, as authorized under this plan.

      The 2007 OSIP replaced the 1998, 2000 and 2002 OSIPs (“Old Plans”). The Old Plans will remain in existence solely for the purpose of addressing the rights of holders of already granted existing awards. Prior to the approval of the 2007 OSIP, we granted 453,620 options, with an exercise price of $94.47 and a 10-year term and 256,527 restricted stock units in 2007. No additional awards will be granted under the Old Plans. Any shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the old plans that subsequently lapse, expire, are forfeited or are cancelled are available for grant under the 2007 OSIP.

      Stock Options

      Eligible employees receive stock options as a portion of their total compensation. Such options generally become exercisable over a three-year period, expire 10 years from the date of grant and are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment.

      We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees. Granted options have exercise prices equal to the market price of Whirlpool common stock on the grant date. The principal assumptions utilized in valuing options include: (1) risk-free interest rate—an estimate based on the yield of U.S. zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option;

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      (2) expected volatility—an estimate based on the historical volatility of Whirlpool common stock for a period equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected option life—an estimate based on historical experience. Based on the results of the model, the weighted-average fair values of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $22.54, $22.07 and $15.55, respectively using the following assumptions:

      Weighted Average Black-Scholes Assumptions

        2007  2006  2005

      Risk-free interest rate

        4.7%  4.6%  4.4%

      Expected volatility

        22.6%  25.6%  25.5%

      Expected dividend yield

        1.9%  2.1%  2.4%

      Expected option life

        5 years  5 years  5 years

      Stock Option Activity

      The following table summarizes stock option activity during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

         2007  2006  2005

      Thousands of shares, except per share data

        Number
      of Options
        Weighted-
      Average
      Exercise
      Price
        Number
      of Options
        Weighted-
      Average
      Exercise
      Price
        Number
      of Options
        Weighted-
      Average
      Exercise
      Price

      Outstanding at January 1

        5,013  $84.97  3,733  $60.37  5,325  $58.46

      Granted

        457   94.48  2,249   117.56  256   63.99

      Exercised

        (1,052)  63.19  (871)  63.11  (1,731)  54.54

      Canceled or expired

        (114)  106.10  (98)  90.20  (117)  67.59
                           

      Outstanding at December 31

        4,304  $90.71  5,013  $84.97  3,733  $60.37
                           

      Exercisable at December 31

        3,564  $90.70  4,488  $79.47  3,156  $58.76
                           

      During the year ended December 31, 2006, we granted 2,249,000 stock options of which 1,778,000 relate to Maytag options that were converted to Whirlpool options on the date of the Maytag acquisition at a weighted average grant price of $125.10.

      The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $39 million and $20 million for the underlying sharesyears ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The related tax benefits were $15 million and $8 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash received from the exercise of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled $68 million.

      The fair value of stock options vested was $5 million, $32 million and $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Of the $32 million that vested in 2006, $27 million related to the acquisition of Maytag.

      The table below summarizes additional information related to stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007:

      Options in thousands / dollars in millions, except share data

        Outstanding Net
      of Expected
      Forfeitures
        Options
      Exercisable

      Number of options

         4,207   3,564

      Weighted-average exercise price

        $90.77  $90.70

      Aggregate intrinsic value

        $44  $44

      Weighted-average remaining contractual term, in years

         4.7   4.0

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Restricted Stock Units

      Eligible employees receive Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) as a portion of their total compensation. RSU awards vest over various time periods depending upon the program, but generally vest from two years to seven years and convert to unrestricted common stock at the dateconclusion of grant. Stock options generally have 10-year terms, and vest and become fully exercisable over a two or three year period after date of grant. Compensation expense related to the Company's stock-based incentive plans is recognized ratably over each plan's defined vesting period. Pre-tax expenses underAll or a portion of an award may be canceled if employment is terminated before the Company's stock-based incentive plans were $24 million, $15 million and $21 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.end of the relevant vesting period. Certain awards accrue dividend equivalents on outstanding RSUs (in the form of additional RSUs) based on dividends declared on Whirlpool common stock. We measure compensation cost based on the closing market price of Whirlpool common stock at the grant date.

      The Company's stock option and incentive plans permitfollowing table summarizes RSU activity during the grant of stock options and other stock awards covering up to 10.5 million shares to key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, of which options and awards covering up to 2.6 million shares are available for grant atyear ended December 31, 2005. Outstanding restricted and phantom shares totaled 1,500,125 with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $67.56 per share at December 31, 2005 and 1,249,759 with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $61.55 per share at December 31, 2004.2007:

      Whirlpool has a Non-employee

      RSUs in thousands

        Number of RSUs  Weighted-Average
      Grant Date Fair
      Value

      Non-vested, December 31, 2006

        1,487  $73.88

      Granted

        332   96.81

      Canceled

        (131)  77.70

      Vested and transferred to unrestricted

        (189)  60.79
             

      Non-vested, December 31, 2007

        1,499  $87.55
             

      Nonemployee Director Equity Plan. This planPlan

      We have a Nonemployee Director Equity Plan that provides for (a) a one time grant of 1,000 shares of common stock upon a director joining the Board of Directors; (b) an annual grant of stock worth $54,000 with the number of shares to be issued to the director determined by dividing $54,000 by the then current fair market value of Whirlpool common stock; and (c) an annual grant of stock options valued at $36,000 with the number of options to be based on dividing $36,000 by the product of the then current fair market value of a single share of the common stock multiplied by 0.35; and (c) an annual grant of stock worth $54,000 with the number of shares to be issued to the director determined by dividing $54,000 by the then current fair market value of the common stock of the Company.0.35. The exercise price under each option granted is the fair market value of the common stock as of the final trading day before the annual meeting of stockholders. These options are exercisable for 20 years or, if earlier, two years after a non-employeenonemployee director ceases to serve on Whirlpool'sour Board of Directors, provided that no option is exercisable within the first six months of its term, unless death or disability of the director occurs. In the event of a non-employee director'snonemployee director’s death, such options will be exercisable for one year from the date of death. Payment of the exercise price may be made in cash or, if permitted by law, Whirlpool common stock, valued at its market price at the time of exercise. At December 31, 2005,2007, there were 275,782239,676 shares available for grant under this plan.

      The fair value of stock options used to compute pro-forma net earnings and diluted net earnings per share disclosures, as presented in Note 1, is the estimated present value at grant date using the Black-Scholes



      option-pricing model with the following assumptions for 2005, 2004 and 2003: expected volatility of 25.5%, 28.7% and 31.7%; dividend yield of 2.4%, 2.6% and 2.2%; risk-free interest rate of 4.4%, 3.6% and 3.2%, and a weighted-average expected option life of five years for all three years.

      A summary of stock option information follows:

       
       2005
       2004
       2003
      Thousands of shares,
      except per share data

       Number
      of
      Shares

       Weighted-
      Average
      Exercise
      Price

       Number
      of
      Shares

       Weighted-
      Average
      Exercise
      Price

       Number
      of
      Shares

       Weighted-
      Average
      Exercise
      Price

      Outstanding at January 1 5,325 $58.46 5,892 $55.82 5,965 $55.63
      Granted 256  63.99 666  72.91 1,315  50.06
      Exercised (1,731) 54.54 (1,124) 52.84 (1,251) 48.60
      Canceled or expired (117) 67.59 (109) 61.82 (137) 58.37
        
       
       
       
       
       
      Outstanding at December 31 3,733 $60.37 5,325 $58.46 5,892 $55.82
        
       
       
       
       
       
      Exercisable at December 31 3,156 $58.76 4,237 $57.62 3,937 $55.78
        
       
       
       
       
       
      Fair value of options granted during the year   $15.55   $17.07   $12.67
          
         
         

      Of the outstanding options at December 31, 2005, 1.8 million options, of which 1.7 million are exercisable at a weighted-average price of $51.57, have exercise prices ranging from $45.75 to $62.64 and a weighted-average remaining life of 5 years. The remaining 1.9 million outstanding options, of which 1.4 million are exercisable at a weighted-average price of $67.69, have exercise prices ranging from $62.98 to $79.14 and a weighted-average remaining life of 6.6 years.

      (11)(12) RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

      Whirlpool Restructuring (excluding Maytag)

      Under Whirlpool'sour ongoing global operating platform initiatives, the Companywe implemented certain restructuring initiatives to enhance Whirlpool's competitivestrengthen our leadership position in the global appliance industry. The Company plansWe plan to continue itsa comprehensive worldwide effort to optimize itsour regional manufacturing facilities, supply base, product platforms and technology resources to better support itsour global brands and customers. In addition to the global operating platform initiatives, the Company began to implement organizational initiatives designed to increase efficiencies in support functions throughout the Company. The restructuring plan primarily relates to headcount reductions in European sales and supporting offices, moving manufacturing capacity to lower cost locations throughout Europe, and headcount reductions in an Asian manufacturing location.

      Under a restructuring initiative begun in 2004, the CompanyWe incurred restructuring charges of $61 million, $55 million and $57 million and $22 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company also recognized a ($7) million credit in 2004 resulting from final settlements of prior year restructuring initiatives. Net charges of $57 million and $15 million are included induring the restructuring costs line in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. As ofyears ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, approximately 2,000 employees have been terminated as a result of this initiative. The Company expects that this restructuring initiative may reduce up to 3,500 positions in total.

      Through December 31, 2003, the Company had approved all phases of a restructuring program that began in the fourth quarter of 2000 and resulted in cumulative pre-tax restructuring charges of $247 million, of which $3 million was recognized during 2003.respectively. These charges are included in the restructuring costs line on the Company'sin our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The restructuring plan relatesIncome and primarily consist of charges to restructure the closing of a refrigeration plantcooking platform in the Company's Latin America, region, a parts packing facilityshift refrigeration and a



      cooking plant in the North America region, a plastic components facility in the Asia region, the relocation of several laundry manufacturing facilitiesdishwasher capacity to lower cost regions in Europe and aNorth America, restructure the laundry platform in North America and reorganize the salaried workforce throughout Europe. We expect to incur

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      additional costs of $100 million in 2008 related to these initiatives. For additional information about restructuring charges by business segment, see Note 15.

      A summary of the Company's microwave business in its Europe region. Employees terminated to date under the plan include both hourly and salaried employees, the majority of which were hourly personnel at the facilities listed above. For the initiatives announced through December 31, 2003, the Company expected to reduce over 7,100 positions; substantially all of whom had left the Company as of December 31, 2005.

      Details of theour restructuring liability balance and full year restructuring activity for 2007, 2006 and 2005 2004 and 2003 areis as follows:

      Millions of dollars

       Beginning
      Balance

       Charge to
      Earnings

       Cash Paid
       Non-cash
       Revision of
      Estimate

       Translation
       Ending
      Balance

      2005                     
       Termination costs $9 $50 $(42)$ $ $(2)$15
       Non-employee exit costs  4  7  (1) (6)     4
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Total $13 $57 $(43)$(6)$ $(2)$19
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      2004                     
       Termination costs $41 $16 $(41)$ $(7)$ $9
       Non-employee exit costs  4  6  (2) (4)     4
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Total $45 $22 $(43)$(4)$(7)$ $13
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      2003                     
       Termination costs $116 $3 $(89)$ $ $11 $41
       Non-employee exit costs  6    (5)     3  4
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Total $122 $3 $(94)$ $ $14 $45
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Millions of dollars

        January 1,
      Balance
        Charge to
      Earnings
        Cash
      Paid
        Non-Cash  Translation  December 31,
      Balance

      2007

               

      Termination costs

        $14  $34  $(36) $  $1  $13

      Non-employee exit costs

         3   27   (14)  (13)     3
                              

      Total

        $17  $61  $(50) $(13) $1  $16
                              

      2006

               

      Termination costs

        $15  $26  $(29) $  $2  $14

      Non-employee exit costs

         4   29   (10)  (20)     3
                              

      Total

        $19  $55  $(39) $(20) $2  $17
                              

      2005

               

      Termination costs

        $9  $50  $(42) $  $(2) $15

      Non-employee exit costs

         4   7   (1)  (6)     4
                              

      Total

        $13  $57  $(43) $(6) $(2) $19
                              

      (12)  PRODUCT RECALLSMaytag Integration

      On February 25, 2005,Maytag integration restructuring accruals resulted from the Company announcedclosing of the recall of approximately 162,000 under-the-counter plastic tall tub dishwashers dueNewton, Iowa, Herrin, Illinois and Searcy, Arkansas laundry manufacturing plants as well as the former headquarters and other administrative offices during 2006. The costs accrued are recorded in other long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding initial amount recorded to a potential safety issue. There have been no reports of personal injury or property damage associated with these dishwashers. goodwill.

      The Company also is undertakingfollowing table summarizes activity relating to our Maytag integration restructuring accruals for the repair of up to an additional 223,000 of these dishwashers for a separate quality issue. The Company accrued $17.1 million related to the quality issues within cost of products sold during the fourth quarter of 2004. During 2005, the estimated cost to recall and repair these units was reduced to $13.7 million primarily due to the recovery of certain costs from a parts supplier. The remaining cost accrual and supplier receivable were not material atyears ended December 31, 2005. During 2003, the Company incurred an additional $16 million ($10 million after-tax) primarily related to final expenses in connection with a 2001 recall.2007 and 2006:


      Millions of dollars

        January 1,
      2007

      Balance
        Cash
      Paid
        Non-Cash  Revision of
      Estimate
        Translation  December 31,
      2007

      Balance

      Termination costs

        $114  $(59) $  $(13) $1  $43

      Non-employee exit costs

         46   (16)  (5)  16      41
                              

      Total

        $160  $(75) $(5) $3  $1  $84
                              

      Millions of dollars

        March 31,
      2006

      Balance
        Cash
      Paid
        Non-Cash  Revision of
      Estimate
        Translation  December 31,
      2006

      Balance

      Termination costs

        $134  $(71) $  $51  $  $114

      Non-employee exit costs

         35   (5)     16      46
                              

      Total

        $169  $(76) $  $67  $  $160
                              

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      (13) INCOME TAXES

      Income tax expense is as follows:

      Year ended December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
       2003
       
      Current:          
       Federal $57 $202 $36 
       State and local  10  18  5 
       Foreign  117  73  76 
        
       
       
       
         184  293  117 
      Deferred:          
       Federal  (9) (119) 88 
       State and local  (3) (4) (1)
       Foreign  (1) 39  24 
        
       
       
       
         (13) (84) 111 
        
       
       
       
      Total income tax expense $171 $209 $228 
        
       
       
       

      Year ended December 31—Millions of dollars

            2007          2006          2005     

      Current:

          

      Federal

        $(28) $125  $57 

      State and local

         8   (7)  10 

      Foreign

         128   68   117 
                   
         108   186   184 

      Deferred:

          

      Federal

         28   (112)  (9)

      State and local

         3   1   (3)

      Foreign

         (22)  51   (1)
                   
         9   (60)  (13)
                   

      Total income tax expense

        $117  $126  $171 
                   

      Domestic and foreign earnings before income taxes and other items are as follows:

      Year ended December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
       2003
      Domestic $347 $402 $473
      Foreign  250  214  179
        
       
       
      Total earnings before taxes and other items $597 $616 $652
        
       
       

      Year ended December 31—Millions of dollars

            2007          2006          2005    

      Domestic

        $103  $231  $347

      Foreign

         701   388   250
                  

      Total earnings from continuing operations before taxes and other items

        $804  $619  $597
                  

      Reconciliations between tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and the consolidated effective income tax rate for earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and other items are as follows:

      Year ended December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
       2003
       
      Income tax expense computed at
      U.S. federal statutory rate
       $209 $217 $229 
      State and local taxes, net of
      federal tax benefit
        7  9  3 
      Tax effect of permanent differences  11  4  12 
      Medicare Part D subsidy  (11)    
      Foreign tax rate differential  7  8  5 
      U.S. tax on foreign dividends and subpart F income  81  3  20 
      U.S. foreign tax credits  (144) (53) (41)
      Foreign withholding taxes  18  10  22 
      Foreign government tax incentive    (2) (4)
      Expired foreign loss carryforwards  2     
      Deductible interest on capital  (1) (7) 2 
      U.S. government tax incentives  (5) (5) (3)
      Settlement of global tax audits  (30) 45  12 
      Valuation allowances  4  6  (14)
      Other items, net  23  (26) (15)
        
       
       
       
      Income tax expense $171 $209 $228 
        
       
       
       

      Year ended December 31

        2007  2006  2005 

      Income tax rate computed at U.S. federal statutory rate

        35.0%  35.0%  35.0% 

      Foreign government tax incentive

        (7.6) (2.7)  

      Valuation allowances

        (7.1) 0.3  0.7 

      U.S. government tax incentives

        (3.7) (10.2) (0.9)

      Deductible interest on capital

        (2.7) (3.1) (1.0)

      Settlement of global tax audits

        2.7  2.6  (5.0)

      U.S. foreign tax credits

        (2.2) (5.3) (24.0)

      Impact of tax rate changes

        1.9     

      Foreign withholding taxes

        1.9  2.3  3.0 

      Foreign tax rate differential

        (1.4) 1.6  1.1 

      Real estate donations

        (1.1)    

      State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit

        1.0  0.3  1.2 

      U.S. tax on foreign dividends and subpart F income

        0.7  2.9  13.5 

      Medicare Part D subsidy

        (0.6) (1.1) (1.9)

      Other items, net

        (2.3) (2.2) 6.9 
                

      Effective tax rate

        14.5%  20.4%  28.6% 
                

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities used for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.


      Significant components of the Company'sour deferred tax liabilities and assets from continuing operations are as follows:

      December 31 — Millions of dollars

       2005
       2004
       
      Deferred tax liabilities       
      Property, plant and equipment $230 $224 
      Financial services leveraged leases  37  61 
      Pensions  116  193 
      Software costs  6  7 
      LIFO inventory  15  18 
      Other  141  167 
        
       
       
       Total deferred tax liabilities $545 $670 

      Deferred tax assets

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Postretirement obligations $184 $261 
      Pensions — includes additional minimum liability  191  34 
      Restructuring costs  7  1 
      Product warranty accrual  36  22 
      Receivable and inventory allowances  68  68 
      Loss carryforwards  271  275 
      Employee payroll and benefits  57  76 
      Foreign tax credit carryforwards  58  57 
      Other  165  196 
        
       
       
       Total deferred tax assets $1,037 $990 
        
       
       
       Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets $(114)$(105)
        
       
       
       Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances $923 $885 
        
       
       
      Net deferred tax assets $378 $215 
        
       
       

      December 31—Millions of dollars

        2007  2006 

      Deferred tax liabilities

         

      Property, plant and equipment

        $262  $303 

      Financial services leveraged leases

         25   30 

      Pensions

         17    

      Software costs

         17   13 

      LIFO inventory

         81   40 

      Intangibles

         633   639 

      Other

         163   149 
               

      Total deferred tax liabilities

         1,198   1,174 
               

      Deferred tax assets

         

      Postretirement obligations

         492   486 

      Pensions

         189   249 

      Restructuring costs

         30   60 

      Product warranty accrual

         85   108 

      Receivable and inventory allowances

         46   116 

      Capital loss carryforwards

         19   19 

      Loss carryforwards

         286   256 

      Employee payroll and benefits

         128   86 

      Foreign tax credit carryforwards

         102   93 

      U.S. general business credit carryforwards

         88   63 

      Accrued expenses

         128   117 

      Other

         137   115 
               

      Total deferred tax assets

         1,730   1,768 
               

      Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

         (72)  (135)
               

      Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances

         1,658   1,633 
               

      Net deferred tax assets

        $460  $459 
               

      At December 31, 2005, the Company has2007, we have foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $893$815 million, $689$680 million of which do not expire, with substantially all of the remaining $204 million expiring in various years through 2014.2015. As of December 31, 2005, the Company2007, we had $58$102 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards and $88 million of U.S. general business credit carryforwards available to offset future payments of federal income taxes, expiring in varying amounts between 20122009 and 2015.2027.

      The Company has recordedOur acquisition of Maytag included $19 million of net deferred tax assets related to capital loss carryforwards of $51 million which have been offset by certain valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of net operating$19 million. The capital loss carryforwards can only be offset against capital gains and foreign tax credit carryforwards that will be realized. The valuation allowance of $114 millionexpire at December 31, 2005 is made up of $94 million of foreign2008. We believe the net operating loss carryforwards and $20 million of other deferred tax assets that the Company currently believes are more likely than not to remain unrealized in the future.

      Other than earnings specifically noted below,We have recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the Company hasestimated amount of deferred tax assets associated with net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards that we believe will be realized. In 2007, we reduced the valuation allowance primarily due to certain global tax planning activities that will allow for the realization of

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      the related deferred tax assets. Our remaining recorded valuation allowance of $72 million at December 31, 2007 consists of $31 million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards and $41 million of other deferred tax assets.

      We have historically reinvested all of the unremitted earnings of itsour foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. Due to a restructuring of selected foreign subsidiaries, the Company plansWe plan to distribute approximately $102$351 million of foreign earnings over the next several years. This distribution is presently forecastforecasted to result in tax benefits which have not been recorded currently because of itstheir contingent nature. There has been no deferred tax liability provided on the remaining amount of unremitted earnings of $1.23$1.5 billion at December 31, 2005.2007. Should the Companywe make a distribution from the unremitted earnings of itsour foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, itwe would be subject to additional U.S. taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of the deferred tax liability


      associated with these unremitted earnings because of the complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation.earnings.

      During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company repatriated approximately $25 million of foreign earnings from its affiliates in Hong Kong and Colombia under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The repatriation occurred for purposes of balancing the Company's cash position abroad and had an immaterial impact on the Company's tax provision.

      In August 2005, President Bush signed into law the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (the "2005 Energy Act"). Among the many provisions of this legislationWe are manufacturer's tax credits in 2006 and 2007 for the accelerated production of super-efficient washers, refrigerators and dishwashers to meet 2007 Energy Star standards. Whirlpool has historically, and will continue to, invest in innovative and energy efficient products for its customers and has products in development that will support utilization of these tax credits over the two-year period.

      As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in various stages of audits by variouscertain governmental tax authorities. The Company establishesWe establish liabilities for probable and estimable assessments by taxing authorities resulting from known tax exposures. Such amounts represent a reasonable provision for taxes ultimately expected to be paid, and may need to be adjusted over time as more information becomes known.

      We adopted FIN 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB 109” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007, at which time the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefit on the Consolidated Balance Sheet was $166 million. Upon adoption of FIN 48, we recognized a $2 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a $2 million decrease in federal benefit related to state uncertain tax positions. The Company paidincrease has been accounted for as a reduction to retained earnings in the amount of $8 million and a reduction to goodwill in the amount of $4 million. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

      Millions of dollars

          

      Balance, January 1, 2007

        $166 

      Additions for tax positions of the current year

         36 

      Additions for tax positions of the prior year

         20 

      Reductions for tax positions of prior years for:

        

      Changes in judgment

         (28)

      Settlements during the period

         (4)

      Lapses of applicable statute of limitation

         (1)
           

      Balance, December 31, 2007

        $189 
           

      Included in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 are $141 million of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate, net of $16 million federal benefit related to state uncertain tax positions. Also included in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007 are $48 million of unrecognized tax benefits associated with liabilities assumed from the acquisition of Maytag that if recognized would reduce goodwill, net of $2 million federal benefit related to state uncertain tax positions.

      We recognize charges related to interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income taxestax expense. As of $276January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007 we have accrued interest and penalties of $35 and $40 million related to unrecognized tax benefits, respectively, of which $36 million would impact the effective tax rate and $4 million would impact goodwill if reversed in 2005, $277 milliona future period. Interest and penalties are not included in the tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits above.

      We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to any significant U.S. federal, state, local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      for years before 2004. The Internal Revenue Service commenced an examination of our U.S. income tax returns for 2004 and $2612005 in the first quarter of 2007 that is anticipated to be completed during early 2009. It is reasonably possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties related to dispersion of income, tax credits and the tax basis of certain assets totaling $67 million in 2003.could be settled with the related jurisdictions during the next 12 months.

      (14) PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFITS PLANS

      The Company has bothWe have funded and unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all of itsour North American employees and certain European and Brazilian employees. The formula for U.S. salaried employees receivecovered under the defined benefitsbenefit plan sponsored by Whirlpool was based on years of service and final average salary, while the formula for U.S. hourly employees receive benefitscovered under the defined benefit plans sponsored by Whirlpool were based on specific dollar amounts for each year of service. There were multiple formulas for employees covered under the defined benefit plan sponsored by Maytag, including a cash balance formula. The U.S. plans are frozen for the majority of participants. An enhanced defined contribution plan is being provided to affected employees subsequent to the pension plan freezes and is not classified within the net periodic benefit cost.

      The U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plans provide that in the event of a plan termination within five years (36 months for the defined benefit plan sponsored by Maytag) following a change in control of the Company,Whirlpool, any assets held by the plans in excess of the amounts needed to fund accrued benefits would be used to provide additional benefits to plan participants. A change in control generally means either a change in the majority of the incumbent Board of Directors or an acquisition of 25% (30% for purposes of the Whirlpool Production Employees Retirement Plans)Plans and 20% for purposes of the defined benefit plan sponsored by Maytag) or more of the voting power of the Company'sWhirlpool’s outstanding stock, without the approval of a majority of the incumbent board.stock.

      The Company also has aWe provide postretirement health care benefit programbenefits for eligible retired U.S. employees. Eligible retirees areinclude those who were full-time employees with 10 years of service who attained age 55 while in service with us and those union retirees who met the Company. Theeligibility requirements of their collective bargaining agreements. In general, the postretirement health care plans are generally contributory with participants'participants’ contributions adjusted annually. The postretirement health care plansannually and generally include cost-sharing provisions that limit the Company'sour exposure for recent and future retirees. The plans are unfunded. The Company has reservedWe reserve the right to modify the benefits. In June 2003, the Company announced a modification to its U.S. retiree health care plans that affects certain future and current retirees, and is based on a Retiree Healthcare Savings Account ("RHSA"), where notional accounts are established for eligible active U.S. paid employees. The accounts reflect each year of service beginning at age 40 and is designed toWe provide employees who retire from the Company after December 31, 2003 with credits to apply towards health care premiums. In June 2003, the Company recorded a one-time gain of $13.5 million, net of tax, related to the modification of its retiree health care plan. Nono significant postretirement medical benefits are provided by the Company to non-U.S. employees.



      Amended Plans

      The CompanyPension Protection Act of 2006 requires changes in the basis for calculating lump sum payments effective January 1, 2008. The effect of these changes was required to remeasurereduce the net periodic costprojected benefit obligation (“PBO”) at December 31, 2007 by approximately $39 million.

      In December of 2007, The Maytag Corporation Employees Retirement Plan was amended to cease all benefit accruals effective December 31, 2007 for the production plant in Amana, Iowa. An enhanced defined contribution benefit will be provided to eligible affected employees subsequent to the effective date of the plan amendment. Also, effective for retirements on and funded statusafter January 1, 2008, a retirement supplement of one$300 per month will be provided for 24 months following the retirement of its pension plans andeligible Amana hourly employees retiring during the term of the current union agreement. The effect of this amendment was to increase the PBO at December 31, 2007 by approximately $2 million.

      In July of 2007, we announced certain changes to the Whirlpool Retiree Healthcare Plan at February 29, 2004. The interest ratethat will take effect on January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2009. These changes include an adjustment to the Retiree Health Savings Account (RHSA) credit received by certain groups of heritage Maytag and heritage Whirlpool employees, the

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      substitution of post-65 drug coverage with a credit or adjusted notional account that may be used for this remeasurement was 6%,to offset the same as at year-end 2003.

      In December 2003, thecost of Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the "Act") was enacted. The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, known as Part D premiums or other employer-sponsored medical coverage for certain groups of heritage Maytag and a federal subsidy to sponsorsheritage Whirlpool retirees; and the replacement of certain heritage Maytag retiree health care benefitmedical plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Part D. In 2004, the Company measured the effects of the Act following the guidance in FSP 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003." For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company reflected the estimated federal subsidywith PPO coverage offered under the Act as an actuarial gain as required by FSP 106-2, which caused the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation to decrease by $104 million, and reduced the cost that otherwise would have been recognized in 2004 by approximately $15 million.

      Lump sum retirement distributions were made from the Company's nonqualified pension plans in the third and fourth quarters of 2004 resulting in the recognition of settlement charges of $9.5 million.Whirlpool Retiree Healthcare Plan. As a result of these settlements,changes, we recognized a reduction in our long-term post-employment obligation of $82 million. An additional $46 million reduction in the Company remeasuredlong-term post-employment benefit obligation was realized as a result of a change in discount rate consistent with the nonqualifiedJuly 1, 2007 remeasurement date. The offsetting credit was recorded, net of the related deferred tax asset, as an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income.

      The Whirlpool Production Employees Retirement Plan (“WPERP”) at Fort Smith, Arkansas, which covers union employees, was amended to cease all benefit accruals effective June 30, 2007. An enhanced defined contribution benefit is being provided to eligible affected employees subsequent to the effective date of the plan amendment. As a result of this amendment, we recognized a curtailment charge of approximately $14 million in 2007.

      As a result of a change in law in Italy, we recognized a curtailment credit of $5 million in 2006.

      The U.S. heritage Whirlpool and Maytag pension plans at July 1, 2004 using a discount ratewere amended to cease benefit accruals for the majority of 6.25%salaried and atnon-union participants effective December 31, 2004 using2006. For heritage Whirlpool salaried employees who are eligible to retire before January 1, 2010, the plan freeze will be effective December 31, 2009. In addition, the WPERP at LaVergne, which covers union employees, was amended to cease all benefit accruals effective January 31, 2007. An enhanced defined contribution plan is being provided to affected employees subsequent to the plan freezes. As a discount rateresult of 5.85%.these pension plan freezes, we recognized a net curtailment charge of approximately $6 million in 2006.

      We acquired Maytag on March 31, 2006, and the pension and postretirement net periodic cost has been reflected from that date forward.

      On November 14, 2005, the Companywe amended the Whirlpool EmployeesEmployee Pension Plan (the "WEPP"(“WEPP”). The amendment will bewas reflected in the Company's 2006 pension cost and did not affect the accumulated benefit obligation (the "ABO")ABO or projected benefit obligation (the "PBO")the PBO at December 31, 2005.

      In January 2005, the Companywe amended the WEPP. The CompanyDue to the amendment, we remeasured the net periodic cost and funded status of the plan at January 1, 2005 to reflect the amendment. The effect of this2005. This amendment was to reducereduced the PBO by approximately $80 million. The ABOaccumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) was not affected by the amendment since the accrued benefits as ofat December 31, 2005 were not affected by this change.2005.

      The Company maintains401(k) Defined Contribution Plan

      We maintain a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all U.S. employees. CompanyOur matching contributions for most employees are based on the level of individual participants’ contributions and, for certain domestic union hourly and certain othersalaried Whirlpool employees under the plan,who are eligible to retire on or before December 31, 2009, are based on the Company's annual operating results and the level of individual participants'participants’ contributions. We also make automatic company contributions for eligible employees in an amount equal to 3% of the employee’s eligible pay. Our contributions amounted to $20 million, $12 millionthe following amounts:

      Millions of dollars

        2007  2006  2005

      401(k) Company contributions

        $68  $29  $21

      Adoption of SFAS No. 158

      On December 31, 2006, we adopted the recognition and $15 milliondisclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of SFAS Nos. 87, 88,

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      106 and 132R” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires that we recognize the funded status of our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs and credits, which were previously netted against the plans’ funded status in 2005, 2004our Consolidated Balance Sheets pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” and 2003, respectively.SFAS 106. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as net periodic (benefit) cost pursuant to our accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic (benefit) cost in the same periods will be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. These gains and losses will be subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic (benefit) cost on the same basis as the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at adoption of SFAS 158.

      The Company usesincremental effects of adopting SFAS 158 on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table:

      Millions of dollars

        Before adopting
      SFAS 158
        Adjustments to
      adopt
      SFAS 158
        After adopting
      SFAS 158
       

      ASSETS

          

      Noncurrent benefit asset

        $12  $(12) $ 

      Intangible asset

         38   (38)   

      Deferred tax asset

         115   63   178 

      LIABILITIES

          

      Current benefit liability

            113   113 

      Noncurrent benefit liability

         2,031   14   2,045 

      STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

          

      Accumulated other comprehensive loss

         (201)  (114)  (315)

      We use a December 31 measurement date for the majority of itsour pension and other postretirement benefit plans.



      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Obligations and Funded Status at End of Year

      December 31—Millions

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension Benefits  Foreign Pension Benefits  Other
      Postretirement
      Benefits
       
            2007          2006          2007          2006      2007  2006 

      Funded status

             

      Fair value of plan assets

        $3,062  $3,146  $180  $137  $  $ 

      Benefit obligations

         3,580   3,777   393   360   1,151   1,304 
                               

      Funded status

        $(518) $(631) $(213) $(223) $(1,151) $(1,304)
                               

      Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position

             

      Noncurrent asset

        $  $  $13  $  $  $ 

      Current liability

         (8)  (8)  (10)  (8)  (90)  (97)

      Noncurrent liability

         (510)  (623)  (216)  (215)  (1,061)  (1,207)
                               

      Amount recognized

        $(518) $(631) $(213) $(223) $(1,151) $(1,304)
                               

      Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (pre-tax)

             

      Net actuarial loss

        $275  $281  $31  $39  $131  $215 

      Prior service (credit)/cost

         (23)  33   4   5   (150)  (80)

      Transition (asset)/obligation

               (1)  (1)  1   1 
                               

      Amount recognized

        $252  $314  $34  $43  $(18) $136 
                               

      The PBO and fair value of dollars

       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       Post Employment
      Benefits

       
       
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       
      Fair value of plan assets $1,695 $1,672 $111 $112 $ $ 
      Benefit obligations  2,053  1,985  329  331  701  676 
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Funded status (plan assets less than benefit obligations) $(358)$(313)$(218)$(219)$(701)$(676)
      Amounts not recognized:                   
      Unrecognized transition obligation          1  1 
      Unrecognized net loss  556  479  51  35  262  237 
      Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)  57  140  6  7  (73) (61)
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Prepaid (accrued) cost $255 $306 $(161)$(177)$(511)$(499)
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       Post Employment
      Benefits

       
       
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       
      Prepaid benefit cost $ $329 $ $ $ $ 
      Accrued benefit cost  (277) (163) (190) (204) (511) (499)
      Intangible asset  60  48  4  4     
      Accumulated other comprehensive income  472  92  25  23     
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Prepaid (accrued) cost $255 $306 $(161)$(177)$(511)$(499)
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      The accumulated benefit obligation for all U.S. defined benefit pension plans was $1,972 million and $1,772 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for all foreign pension plans was $304 million and $303 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

      At the end of 2005 and 2004, the PBO, ABO, and FVplan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligationPBO in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension Benefits  Foreign Pension Benefits
        2007  2006  2007  2006

      PBO

        $3,580  $3,777  $280  $320

      Fair value of plan assets

         3,062   3,146   55   101

      The PBO, ABO and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligationABO in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension Benefits  Foreign Pension Benefits
        2007  2006  2007  2006

      PBO

        $3,580  $3,777  $274  $285

      ABO

         3,559   3,746   259   273

      Fair value of plan assets

         3,062   3,146   50   66

      December 31—Millions of dollarsNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

       
       PBO Exceeds FV
      U.S. Pension

       PBO Exceeds FV
      Foreign Pension

       ABO Exceeds FV
      U.S. Pension

       ABO Exceeds FV
      Foreign Pension

      End of Year

       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
      PBO $2,053 $1,985 $298 $331 $2,053 $536 $258 $330
      ABO  1,972  1,772  274  303  1,972  524  239  302
      FV  1,695  1,672  80  112  1,695  422  45  110

      Change in Benefit Obligation — Millions

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension Benefits  Foreign Pension Benefits  Other Postretirement
      Benefits
       
            2007          2006          2007          2006          2007          2006     

      Benefit obligation, beginning of year

        $3,777  $2,053  $360  $329  $1,304  $701 

      Service cost

         25   82   7   12   22   21 

      Interest cost

         215   197   19   18   73   66 

      Plan participants’ contributions

               2   1   16   13 

      Actuarial (gain)/loss

         (19)  (101)  (23)  (12)  (80)  (31)

      Gross benefits paid

         (381)  (235)  (26)  (29)  (112)  (98)

      less: federal subsidy on benefits paid

                     5   7 

      Plan amendments

         (37)           (82)  (16)

      Acquisitions/divestitures

            1,818   (1)  21      641 

      New plans

               23      1    

      Curtailments

            (37)     (7)      

      Settlements

               (1)         

      Foreign currency exchange rates

               33   27   4    
                               

      Benefit obligation, end of year

        $3,580  $3,777  $393  $360  $1,151  $1,304 
                               

      ABO, end of year

        $3,559  $3,746  $374  $338  $  $ 
                               

      Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligation at End of dollarsYear

       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       Post Employment
      Benefits

       
       
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       
      Benefit obligation as of January 1 $1,985 $1,771 $331 $206 $676 $741 
      Service cost  84  88  11  12  14  12 
      Interest cost  113  110  17  16  37  37 
      Plan amendments  (74) 25    1  (20) (22)
      Participant contributions      1    9  6 
      Actuarial (gain)/loss  46  88  22  10  38  (48)
      Curtailments      4       
      Benefits paid  (101) (97) (27) (22) (54) (50)
      New plans      3  86     
      Foreign currency exchange rate      (29) 23  1   
      Settlements      (4) (1)    
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Benefit obligation as of December 31

       

      $

      2,053

       

      $

      1,985

       

      $

      329

       

      $

      331

       

      $

      701

       

      $

      676

       
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

         U.S. Pension Benefits  Foreign Pension Benefits  Other
      Postretirement
      Benefits
                 2007                 2006                  2007                  2006          2007  2006

      Discount rate

        6.15% 5.85%  3.5 – 11.3%  4.5 – 11.3%  6.05%  5.75%

      Rate of compensation increase

        4.5/3.0% 4.5/3.0%  2.0 – 7.1%  2.5 – 7.1%    

      Health care cost trend rate

                 

      Initial rate

               8.50%  9.00%

      Ultimate rate

               5.00%  5.00%

      Years to ultimate

               7  4

      Change in Plan Assets — Millions of dollars

       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       Post Employment
      Benefits

       
       
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       
      Fair value of plan assets as of January 1 $1,672 $1,550 $112 $99 $ $ 
      Actual return on plan assets  109  170  12  5     
      Company contributions  15  31  25  21  45  44 
      Plan participant contributions      1  1  9  6 
      Settlements    18  (4) (1)    
      Benefits paid  (101) (97) (27) (22) (54) (50)
      New plans      1        
      Foreign currency exchange rates      (8) 8     
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Fair value of plan assets as of December 31

       

      $

      1,695

       

      $

      1,672

       

      $

      111

       

      $

      112

       

      $


       

      $


       
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension
      Benefits
        Foreign Pension
      Benefits
        Other
      Postretirement
      Benefits
       
        2007  2006      2007          2006      2007  2006 

      Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year

        $3,146  $1,695  $137  $111  $  $ 

      Actual return on plan assets

         222   344   (3)  9       

      Employer contribution

         75   56   25   22   96   85 

      Plan participants’ contributions

               2   1   16   13 

      Gross benefits paid

         (381)  (235)  (26)  (29)  (112)  (98)

      Acquisitions/divestitures

            1,286      14       

      New plans

               31          

      Foreign currency exchange rates

               14   9       
                               

      Fair value of plan assets, end of year

        $3,062  $3,146  $180  $137  $  $ 
                               

      Components of Net Periodic Benefit CostNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

       
        
        
        
        
        
        
       Post Employment
      Benefits

       
       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       
      Millions of dollars

       
       2005
       2004
       2003
       2005
       2004
       2003
       2005
       2004
       2003
       
      Service cost $84 $88 $66 $11 $12 $5 $14 $12 $13 
      Interest cost  113  110  101  17  16  12  37  37  42 
      Expected return on plan assets  (154) (160) (125) (5) (7) (7)      
      Amortization of transition obligation        1  1  1       
      Amortization of prior service cost  9  19  16        (7) (6) (4)
      Amortization of net loss  14  1  5    1  1  15  11  11 
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Net periodic cost $66 $58 $63 $24 $23 $12 $59 $54 $62 
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Curtailments

       

       


       

       


       

       


       

       


       

       


       

       


       

       


       

       


       

       

      (23

      )
      Special termination benefits      3             
      Settlements    10    4          (1)
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Total pension cost $66 $68 $66 $28 $23 $12 $59 $54 $38 
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Additional InformationU.S. Pension Plan Asset Allocation

       
        
        
        
        
       Post Employment
      Benefits

       
       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       
      Weighted-average assumptions
      used to determine benefit
      obligations at December 31

       
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       

      Discount rate

       

      5.60

      %

      5.80

      %

      4.0% - 11.3

      %

      4.5% - 11.3

      %

      5.50

      %

      5.50

      %
      Rate of compensation increase 4.50%4.50%2.5% -  7.1%2.5% -  7.1%N/A N/A 
      Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.00%10.00%
      Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.00%5.00%
      Year that ultimate rate is reached N/A N/A N/A N/A 2010 2008 

       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       Post Employment Benefits
      Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost for year ended December 31

       2005
       2004
       2003
       2005
       2004
       2003
       2005
       2004
       2003
                        6.75% at 1/1/2003

      Discount Rate

       

      5.80

      %

      6.00

      %

      6.75

      %

      4.5% - 11.3

      %

      5.0% - 11.3

      %

      5.5% - 11.3

      %

      5.50

      %

      6.00

      %

      5.75% at 6/1/2003

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      6.50% at 8/1/2003

      Expected return on plan assets

       

      8.75

      %

      8.75

      %

      8.75

      %

      4.5% - 11.3

      %

      5.0% - 11.3

      %

      5.5% - 11.3

      %

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

      Rate of compensation increase

       

      4.50

      %

      4.50

      %

      4.50

      %

      2.5% - 8.15

      %

      2.5% - 8.15

      %

      2.5% -  8.0

      %

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

      Health care cost trend rate assumed for current year

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      10.00

      %

      11.00

      %

      9.50%/10.50%

      Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      5.00

      %

      5.00

      %

      5.50%

      Year that the ultimate rate is reached

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      N/A

       

      2010

       

      2008

       

      2007

      Millions of dollars

        Target
      Allocation
        Percentage of
      Plan Assets
       
        2008      2007          2006     

      Asset Category

          

      Equity securities

        66% 64% 70%

      Debt securities

        34  36  30 
                

      Total

        100% 100% 100%
                

      In the U.S., the expected rate of return on plan assets was determined by using the historical asset returns for publicly traded equity and fixed income securities tracked from 19261927 through 20052007 and the historical returns for private equity. The historical equity returns were adjusted downward to reflect future expectations. This adjustment was based on published academic research. The expected returns are weighted by the targeted asset allocations. The resulting weighted-average return was rounded to the nearest quarter of one percent.

      Foreign Pension Plan Asset Allocation

      Millions of dollars

        Target
      Allocation
        Percentage of
      Plan Assets
       
            2008          2007          2006     

      Asset Category

          

      Equity securities

        42% 41% 44%

      Debt securities

        58  50  54 

      Other

          9  2 
                

      Total

        100% 100% 100%
                

      For foreign pension plans, the expected rate of return on plan assets was determined by observing historical returns in the local fixed income and equity markets and computing the weighted average returns with the weights being the asset allocation of each plan.

      Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension Benefits  Foreign Pension
      Benefits
        Other Postretirement
      Benefits
       
        2007  2006  2005  2007  2006  2005  2007  2006  2005 

      Service cost

        $25  $82  $84  $7  $12  $11  $22  $21  $14 

      Interest cost

         215   197   113   19   18   17   73   66   37 

      Expected return on plan assets

         (251)  (224)  (154)  (10)  (8)  (5)         

      Amortization:

                

      Actuarial (gain)/loss

         16   26   14   1   1      4   13   15 

      Prior service (credit)/cost

         5   9   9   1   1      (13)  (8)  (7)

      Transition (asset)/obligation

                     1   1          

      Curtailment (gain)/loss

         14   6         (5)            

      Settlement (gain)/loss

                        4          

      One-time benefit (credit)/charge for new plan

                  (8)        1       
                                           

      Net periodic benefit cost

        $24  $96  $66  $10  $20  $28  $87  $92  $59 
                                           

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Pre-Tax) in 2007

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension
      Benefits
        Foreign Pension
      Benefits
        Other Postretirement
      Benefits
       

      Curtailment effects

        $(14) $ —  $ 

      Settlements

                

      Current year actuarial (gain)/loss

         10   (7)  (80)

      Amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss

         (16)  (1)  (4)

      Current year prior service (credit)/cost

         (37)     (83)

      Amortization of prior service (credit)/cost

         (5)  (1)  13 

      Amortization of transition (asset)/obligation

                
                   

      Total recognized in other comprehensive income (pre-tax)

        $(62) $(9) $(154)
                   

      Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and other comprehensive income (pre-tax)

        $(38) $1  $(67)
                   

      Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Cost

        U.S. Pension Benefits Foreign Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
        2007 2006 2005 2007 2006 2005     2007         2006         2005    

      Discount rate

       5.85% 5.60/6.05% 5.80% 3.00 – 11.30% 4.00 – 11.30% 4.50 – 11.30% 5.75/6.15% 5.50/6.00% 5.50%

      Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

       8.50% 8.50% 8.75% 4.50 – 11.30% 4.50 – 11.30% 4.50 – 11.30%   

      Rate of compensation increase

       4.50/3.00% 4.50% 4.50% 2.00 – 7.10% 2.50 – 7.10% 2.50 – 8.15%   

      Health care cost trend rate

               

      Initial rate

             9.00% 9.00% 10.00%

      Ultimate rate

             5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

      Years to ultimate

             4 4 3

      Additional Information

      Estimated Pre-Tax Amounts that will be Amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Net Period Pension Cost in 2008

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension
      Benefits
        Foreign Pension
      Benefits
        Other
      Postretirement
      Benefits
       

      Actuarial (gain)/loss

        $12  $2  $2 

      Prior service (credit)/cost

            1   (16)
                   

      Total

        $12  $3  $(14)
                   

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      Estimated impact of one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rate

      Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

      Millions of dollars

       One Percentage
      Point Increase

       One Percentage
      Point Decrease

       
      Effect on total of service and interest cost $3 $(3)
      Effect on postretirement benefit obligation  40  (41)

      Millions of dollars

        One Percentage
      Point Increase
        One Percentage
      Point Decrease
       

      Effect on total of service and interest cost

        $6  $(5)

      Effect on postretirement benefit obligations

         87   (78)

      Plan AssetsCash Flows

      The Company's investment philosophy is to diversify the pension assets subject to a specified asset allocation policy. The Company rebalances the asset classes to stay within an acceptable range around the targeted allocation. The asset allocation is based on the belief that, over the long term, equities will outperform fixed income investments. The assets are invested in both indexed funds and actively managed funds, depending on the asset class.

      Whirlpool's pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and target allocation for 2006, by asset category are as follows:

       
       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       
       
        
       Percentage of Plan Assets
      at December 31

        
       Percentage of Plan Assets
      at December 31

       
      Asset Category

       Target
      Allocation
      2006

       Target
      Allocaton
      2006

       
       2005
       2004
       2005
       2004
       
      Equity securities 70%71%70%53%54%43%
      Debt securities 30 29 30 46 44 55 
      Other    1 2 2 
        
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Total 100%100%100%100%100%100%
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Cash Flows

       The Company'sOur funding policy is to contribute to itsour U.S. pension plans amounts sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirement as defined by employee benefit and tax laws, plus additional amounts which the Companywe may determine to be appropriate. In certain countries other than the U.S., the funding of pension plans is not common practice. The Company hasWe have several unfunded non-U.S. pension plans. The Company paysWe pay for retiree medical benefits as they are incurred.

      Employer Contributions — Millions of dollars

       U.S. Pension
       Foreign Pension
       Post Employment
      Benefits

      2006 (expected) $32 $23 $52

      Expected Employer Contributions to Funded Plans

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension
      Benefits
        Foreign Pension
      Benefits

      2008

        $113  $8

      The $32$113 million expected to be contributed to the U.S. pension plans during 20062008 represents the sum of $4 million of expected benefit payments from corporate cash for the unfunded non-qualified pension plans and $28 million of expected voluntary contributions to its funded pension plans. The Company expects no minimumand required contributions to itsour funded U.S. pension plans in 2006.plans.

      The $23$8 million expected to be contributed to the foreign pension plans during 20062008 represents contributions to the Company'sour funded foreign pension plans.

      The $52 million expected to be contributed to fund the other postretirement benefit plans during 2006 represents expected benefit payments from corporate cash.Expected Benefit Payments

      Contributions by participants to the other postretirement benefit plans were $9 million and $6 million for the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.



      The payments from the majority of U.S. pension plans and certain foreign pension plans come from a trust which the Company funds from time to time.

      Estimated Employer Benefit Payments —
      Millions of dollars

       U.S. Pension
       Foreign
      Pension

       Post
      Employment
      Benefits-
      (Gross)

       Post
      Employment
      Benefits-
      Part D Subsidy

       
      2006 $111 $18 $65 $(5)
      2007  120  16  71  (6)
      2008  130  18  77  (6)
      2009  144  21  82  (7)
      2010  153  22  88  (8)
      2011 - 2015  862  141  518  (47)

      Millions of dollars

        U.S. Pension
      Benefits
        Foreign Pension
      Benefits
        Other Postretirement Benefits 
            Gross  Expected Federal
      Subsidy
       

      2008

        $322  $22  $100  $(10)

      2009

         272   20   102   (10)

      2010

         271   21   105   (10)

      2011

         268   22   107   (11)

      2012

         266   33   106   (10)

      2013-2017

         1,319   151   500   (49)

      (15) BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

      Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance of the segment.performance.

      The Company identifiesWe identify such segments based upon geographical regions of operations because each operating segment manufactures home appliances and related components, but serves strategically different markets. The chief

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      operating decision maker evaluates performance based upon each segment'ssegment’s operating income, which is defined as income before interest income and sundry income (expense), interest expense, income taxes, minority interests and before one-time charges.restructuring costs. Total assets by segment are those assets directly associated with the respective operating activities. The "Other/Elimination"Maytag geographic information is included in North America, Europe and Asia segments. The “Other/Eliminations” column primarily includes corporate expenses, assets and eliminations as well as all other one-time charges.restructuring and discontinued operations. Intersegment sales are eliminated within each region with the exception of compressor sales out of Latin America, which are included in Other/Eliminations.

      Sales activity with Sears, a North American major home appliance retailer, represented 16%12%, 17%14% and 18%16% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 20042007, 2006 and 2003,2005, respectively. Related receivables were 21%, 19%16% and 22%18% of consolidated trade receivables as of December 31, 2005, 20042007 and 2003,2006, respectively.

      The Company conductsWe conduct business in two countries that individually comprised over 10% of consolidated net sales and/or total assets within the last three years. The United States represented 56%53%, 56%63% and 57%56% of net sales for 2005, 20042007, 2006 and 2003,2005, respectively, while Brazil totaled 8%12%, 6%9% and 6%8% for 2005, 20042007, 2006 and 2003,2005, respectively. As a percentage of total assets, the United States accounted for 42%, 39%51% and 41%71% at the end of 2005, 20042007 and 2003,2006, respectively. Brazil accounted for 15%, 12% and 11%10% of total assets at the end of 2005, 20042007 and 2003,2006, respectively.


      As described above, the Company'sour chief operating decision maker reviews each operating segment'ssegment’s performance based upon operating income excluding one-time charges, primarily restructuring.which excludes restructuring costs. These chargesrestructuring costs are included in operating profit on a consolidated basis and included in the Other/Eliminations column in the tables below. For 2007, the operating segments recorded total restructuring costs (See Note 12) as follows: North America—$13 million, Europe—$28 million and Latin America—$20 million, for a total of $61 million. For 2006, the operating segments recorded total restructuring costs as follows: North America—$18 million, Europe—$23 million, Latin America—$7 million and Asia—$7 million, for a total of $55 million. For 2005, the operating segments recorded total restructuring chargescosts as follows: North America — $4America—$4 million, Europe — $36Europe—$36 million, Latin America — $8America—$8 million, Asia — $7Asia—$7 million and Corporate — $2Corporate—$2 million, for a total of $57 million. For 2004, the operating segments recorded total restructuring (See Note 11) as follows: North America — $2 million, Europe — $7 million, Latin America — $6 million, Asia — $0 million and Corporate — $0 million, for a total of $15 million. For 2003, the operating segments recorded total restructuring charges as follows: North America — $1 million, Europe — $2 million, Latin America — $0 million, Asia — $0 million and Corporate — $0 million, for a total of $3 million.

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

       
       GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS
      Millions of dollars

       North
      America

       Europe
       Latin
      America

       Asia
       Other/
      Eliminations

       Total
      Whirlpool


      Net sales

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       2005 $8,913 $3,160 $1,962 $422 $(140)$14,317
       2004 $8,254 $3,062 $1,674 $382 $(152)$13,220
       2003 $7,875 $2,691 $1,350 $416 $(156)$12,176

      Intersegment sales

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       2005 $47 $489 $136 $198 $(870)$
       2004 $46 $458 $148 $163 $(815)$
       2003 $46 $359 $153 $126 $(684)$

      Depreciation and amortization

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       2005 $211 $104 $99 $16 $12 $442
       2004 $214 $104 $95 $16 $16 $445
       2003 $217 $92 $83 $15 $20 $427

      Operating profit (loss)

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       2005 $808 $164 $127 $(23)$(284)$792
       2004 $778 $166 $65 $(25)$(226)$758
       2003 $810 $124 $89 $7 $(200)$830

      Total assets

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       2005 $3,745 $2,650 $1,748 $530 $(425)$8,248
       2004 $3,465 $2,976 $1,737 $534 $(531)$8,181
       2003 $3,290 $2,405 $1,395 $523 $(252)$7,361

      Capital expenditures

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
       2005 $280 $104 $87 $18 $5 $494
       2004 $261 $129 $91 $18 $12 $511
       2003 $185 $111 $96 $16 $15 $423

         GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS

      Millions of dollars

        North
      America
        Europe  Latin
      America
        Asia  Other/
      Eliminations
        Total
      Whirlpool

      Net sales

                

      2007

        $11,735  $3,848  $3,437  $557  $(169) $19,408

      2006 reclassified

         11,642   3,432   2,692   457   (143)  18,080

      2006 previously reported

         11,953   3,383   2,430   457   (143)  18,080

      2005 reclassified

         8,658   3,205   2,172   422   (140)  14,317

      2005 as previously reported

         8,913   3,160   1,962   422   (140)  14,317

      Intersegment sales

                

      2007

        $171  $504  $169  $220  $(1,064) $

      2006 reclassified

         64   494   141   231   (930)  

      2006 as previously reported

         64   494   141   231   (930)  

      2005 reclassified

         47   489   136   198   (870)  

      2005 as previously reported

         47   489   136   198   (870)  

      Depreciation and amortization

                

      2007

        $352  $115  $84  $22  $20  $593

      2006 reclassified

         332   105   72   21   20   550

      2006 as previously reported

         332   105   72   21   20   550

      2005 reclassified

         211   104   99   16   12   442

      2005 as previously reported

         211   104   99   16   12   442

      Operating profit (loss)

                

      2007

        $646  $246  $438  $(6) $(261) $1,063

      2006 reclassified

         667   192   237   (11)  (262)  823

      2006 as previously reported

         753   202   218   (3)  (347)  823

      2005 reclassified

         730   159   143   (26)  (214)  792

      2005 as previously reported

         808   164   127   (23)  (284)  792

      Total assets

                

      2007

        $8,107  $3,394  $2,615  $689  $(796) $14,009

      2006 reclassified

         8,449   3,001   2,037   603   (331)  13,759

      2006 as previously reported

         8,536   2,965   1,982   603   (208)  13,878

      2005 reclassified

         3,719   2,683   1,794   530   (425)  8,301

      2005 as previously reported

         3,798   2,650   1,748   530   (425)  8,301

      Capital expenditures

                

      2007

        $251  $144  $110  $20  $11  $536

      2006 reclassified

         320   129   92   23   12   576

      2006 as previously reported

         320   129   92   23   12   576

      2005 reclassified

         280   104   87   18   5   494

      2005 as previously reported

         280   104   87   18   5   494

      NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)

      (16) QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

       
       Three Months Ended
      Millions of dollars, except per share data
       Dec. 31
       Sept. 30
       Jun. 30
       Mar. 31
      2005:            
      Net sales $3,954 $3,599 $3,556 $3,208
      Cost of products sold  3,094  2,831  2,825  2,520
      Net earnings  126  114  96  86

      Per share of common stock:

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Basic net earnings $1.87 $1.70 $1.44 $1.28

      Diluted net earnings

       

      $

      1.83

       

      $

      1.66

       

      $

      1.42

       

      $

      1.26

      Dividends

       

      $

      0.43

       

      $

      0.43

       

      $

      0.43

       

      $

      0.43
       
       Three Months Ended
      Millions of dollars, except per share data
       Dec. 31
       Sept. 30
       Jun. 30
       Mar. 31
      2004:            
      Net sales $3,632 $3,318 $3,264 $3,007
      Cost of products sold  2,895  2,604  2,539  2,320
      Net earnings  97  101  106  101

      Per share of common stock:

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Basic net earnings $1.46 $1.53 $1.56 $1.47

      Diluted net earnings

       

      $

      1.44

       

      $

      1.50

       

      $

      1.53

       

      $

      1.43

      Dividends

       

      $

      0.43

       

      $

      0.43

       

      $

      0.43

       

      $

      0.43

      (17)  PENDING MAYTAG ACQUISITION

         Three Months Ended

      Millions of dollars, except per share data

        Dec. 31  Sept. 30  Jun. 30  Mar. 31

      2007:

              

      Net sales

        $5,325  $4,840  $4,854  $4,389

      Cost of products sold

         4,487   4,148   4,121   3,761

      Net earnings available to common stockholders

         187   175   161   117

      Per share of common stock:

              

      Basic net earnings

         2.42   2.24   2.04   1.48

      Diluted net earnings

         2.38   2.20   2.00   1.46

      Dividends

         0.43   0.43   0.43   0.43
         Three Months Ended

      Millions of dollars, except per share data

        Dec. 31  Sept. 30  Jun. 30  Mar. 31

      2006:

              

      Net sales

        $4,954  $4,843  $4,747  $3,536

      Cost of products sold

         4,259   4,139   4,043   2,979

      Net earnings available to common stockholders

         109   117   89   118

      Per share of common stock:

              

      Basic net earnings

         1.39   1.49   1.16   1.73

      Diluted net earnings

         1.37   1.47   1.14   1.70

      Dividends

         0.43   0.43   0.43   0.43

      On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool entered into a definitive merger agreement with Maytag to acquire all outstanding sharesNet sales and cost of Maytag common stock. The aggregate transaction value, includingproducts sold for the payment to Maytag stockholders of approximately $850 million in cash and between 9.2 million and 11.3 million shares of Whirlpool common stock and assumption of approximately $972 million of Maytag debt (based on Maytag stock, exercisable stock options and debt reported outstanding as of December 31, 2005), is approximately $2.7 billion. The number of shares of Whirlpool common stock to be issued will depend onthree months ended June 30, 2006 have been changed from the volume weighted-average trading prices of Whirlpool common stock during a twenty trading day period ending shortly before completion of the merger. The transaction was approved by Maytag shareholders on December 22, 2005 and is pending regulatory clearance as discussed below.

      Whirlpool has sufficient resources to finance the acquisition. The acquisition and upcoming debt maturities of the combined company are expected to be financed initially through commercial paper supported by existing bank agreements and with new committed bank facilities. The Company expects to eventually refinance a portion of its commercial paperamounts originally filed in the capital markets.

      The merger is subjectQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q to clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, and other customary closing conditions. On December 1, 2005, Whirlpool and Maytag announced that they had certified substantial compliance with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in response toaccount for a request for additional information ("second request") and had agreed not to close the proposed merger before February 27, 2006, without the Antitrust Division's concurrence, recognizing that the Antitrust



      Division could request additional time for review. On February 13, 2006, Whirlpool and Maytag announced that they agreed with the Antitrust Division to a limited extension of time to complete the review of the proposed merger. The companies have agreed not to close the transaction before March 30, 2006 without the Antitrust Division's concurrence.

      Whirlpool and Maytag are working closely with the Department of Justice and continue to cooperate fully with its investigation and respond promptly to its inquiries.

      On August 22, 2005, Whirlpool paid Maytag $40 million to reimburse Maytag for its payment of a fee to terminate its prior merger agreement with Triton Acquisition Holding Co. At December 31, 2005, paid and accrued costs related to the potential merger total $77 million and included the above mentioned fee, as well as $37 million of professional fees incurred in connection with the proposed acquisition. These costs have been capitalized and are recorded in the other assets line within the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. If consummation of the transaction does not occur, the costs will be reclassified to expense. Whirlpool has agreed to pay up to $15 million to assist Maytag in retaining key employees while the merger is pending. Whirlpool also has agreed to pay Maytag a "reverse break-up fee" of $120 million under certain circumstances if the transaction cannot be closed due to an inability to obtain regulatory clearance.


      ELEVEN-YEAR CONSOLIDATED STATISTICAL REVIEW

      (Millions of dollars except share and employee data)

       2005
       2004
       2003
       
      CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS          
      Net sales $14,317 $13,220 $12,176 
      Operating profit(1) $792 $758 $830 
      Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and other items $597 $616 $652 
      Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $422 $406 $414 
      Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations(2) $ $ $ 
      Net earnings (loss)(3) $422 $406 $414 
      Net capital expenditures $494 $511 $423 
      Depreciation $441 $443 $423 
      Dividends $116 $116 $94 

      CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Current assets $4,710 $4,514 $3,865 
      Current liabilities $4,301 $3,985 $3,589 
      Working capital $409 $529 $276 
      Property, plant and equipment—net $2,511 $2,583 $2,456 
      Total assets $8,248 $8,181 $7,361 
      Long-term debt $745 $1,160 $1,134 
      Stockholders' equity $1,745 $1,606 $1,301 

      PER SHARE DATA

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Basic earnings (loss) from continuing operations before accounting change $6.30 $6.02 $6.03 
      Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations before accounting change $6.19 $5.90 $5.91 
      Diluted net earnings (loss)(3) $6.19 $5.90 $5.91 
      Dividends $1.72 $1.72 $1.36 
      Book value $25.54 $23.31 $18.56 
      Closing Stock Price—NYSE $83.76 $69.21 $72.65 

      KEY RATIOS(4)

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Operating profit margin  5.5% 5.7% 6.8%
      Pre-tax margin(5)  4.2% 4.7% 5.4%
      Net margin(6)  2.9% 3.1% 3.4%
      Return on average stockholders' equity(7)  24.6% 30.3% 42.9%
      Return on average total assets(8)  5.1% 5.2% 5.9%
      Current assets to current liabilities  1.1x 1.1x 1.1x
      Total debt-appliance business as a percent of invested capital(9)  40.4% 45.7% 50.9%
      Price earnings ratio  13.5x 11.7x 12.3x
      Interest coverage(10)  5.6x 5.8x 5.7x

      OTHER DATA

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Number of common shares outstanding (in thousands):          
      Average—on a diluted basis  68,272  68,902  70,082 
      Year-end  67,880  66,604  68,931 
      Number of stockholders (year-end)  7,442  7,826  8,178 
      Number of employees (year-end)  65,682  68,125  68,407 
      Total return to shareholders (five year annualized)(11)  14.5% 3.7% 8.1%

      (1)
      Restructuring charges were $57 million in 2005, $15 million in 2004, $3 million in 2003, $101 million in 2002, $150 million in 2001, $343 million in 1997, and $30 million in 1996.

      (2)
      The company's financial services business was discontinued in 1997.

      (3)
      Includes cumulative effect of accounting changes: 2002—Accounting for goodwill under SFAS No. 141 and 142 and impairments of $(613) million or $(8.84) per diluted share; 2001—Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities of $8 million or $0.12 per diluted share.

      (4)
      Key ratios include charges for restructuring charges, as well as other non-recurring items, which increased (decreased) operating profit, earnings before tax and net earnings in the following years: 2002—Accounting for goodwill under SFAS No. 141 and 142 and impairments of $0, $0, and $(613) million, restructuring charges $(101) million, $(101) million and $(76) million,reclassification between discontinued operations and accounting changescontinuing operations. Net sales and cost of $(19) million, $(19)products sold increased by $13 million and $(57)$9 million, and a minority investment write-off in a European business of $0, $0 and $(22) million; 2001—Restructuring charges of $(150) million, $(150) million and $(110) million, product recalls of $(295) million, $(295) million and $(181) million, and discontinued operations and accounting changes of $0, $0 and $(13) million; 1999—Brazil devaluation of $0, $(158) million and $(60) million; 1998—Gainrespectively, from discontinued operations of $0, $0 and $15 million; 1997—Restructuring charges of $(343) million, $(343) million and $(213) million.

       
       2002
       2001
       2000
       1999
       1998
       1997
       1996
       1995
       
                                
        $11,016 $10,343 $10,325 $10,511 $10,323 $8,617 $8,523 $8,163 
        $692 $306 $807 $875 $688 $11 $278 $366 
        $495 $93 $577 $514 $564 $(171)$100 $214 
        $262 $34 $367 $347 $310 $(46)$141 $195 
        $(43)$(21)$ $ $15 $31 $15 $14 
        $(394)$21 $367 $347 $325 $(15)$156 $209 
        $430 $378 $375 $437 $542 $378 $336 $483 
        $391 $368 $371 $386 $399 $322 $318 $282 
        $91 $113 $70 $103 $102 $102 $101 $100 

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
        $3,327 $3,311 $3,237 $3,177 $3,882 $4,281 $3,812 $3,541 
        $3,505 $3,102 $3,303 $2,892 $3,267 $3,676 $4,022 $3,829 
        $(178)$209 $(66)$285 $615 $605 $(210)$(288)
        $2,338 $2,052 $2,134 $2,178 $2,418 $2,375 $1,798 $1,779 
        $6,631 $6,967 $6,902 $6,826 $7,935 $8,270 $8,015 $7,800 
        $1,092 $1,295 $795 $714 $1,087 $1,074 $955 $983 
        $739 $1,458 $1,684 $1,867 $2,001 $1,771 $1,926 $1,877 

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
        $3.86 $0.51 $5.24 $4.61 $4.09 $(0.62)$1.90 $2.64 
        $3.78 $0.50 $5.20 $4.56 $4.06 $(0.62)$1.88 $2.60 
        $(5.68)$0.31 $5.20 $4.56 $4.25 $(0.20)$2.08 $2.78 
        $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 
        $10.67 $21.44 $23.84 $24.55 $26.16 $23.71 $25.93 $25.40 
        $52.22 $73.33 $47.69 $65.06 $55.38 $55.00 $46.63 $53.25 

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
         6.3% 3.0% 7.8% 8.3% 6.7% 0.1% 3.3% 4.5%
         4.5% 0.9% 5.6% 4.9% 5.5% (2.0)% 1.2% 2.6%
         2.4% 0.3% 3.6% 3.3% 3.0% (0.5)% 1.7% 2.4%
         (26.5)% 1.3% 20.7% 17.9% 17.2% (0.8)% 8.2% 11.6%
         (5.8)% 0.3% 5.4% 4.7% 4.0% (0.2)% 2.0% 2.9%
         0.9x 1.1x 1.0x 1.1x 1.2x 1.2x 0.9x 0.9x
         65.1% 48.0% 49.4% 37.7% 43.5% 46.1% 44.2% 45.2%
         (9.2)x 236.5x 9.2x 14.3x 13.0x   22.4x 19.2x
         (0.4)x 1.4x 4.1x 4.3x 3.1x 0.9x 2.5x 3.4x

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
                                
         69,267  68,036  70,637  76,044  76,507  74,697  77,178  76,812 
         68,226  67,215  66,265  74,463  76,089  75,262  74,415  74,081 
         8,556  8,840  11,780  12,531  13,584  10,171  11,033  11,686 
         68,272  61,923  62,527  62,706  59,885  62,419  49,254  46,546 
         1.4% 12.2% 0.3% 7.9% (1.2)% 6.8% 6.3% 20.8%

      (5)
      Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and other items,the amounts originally reported. There was no impact on net earnings as a percentresult of sales.

      (6)
      Earnings from continuing operations, as a percent of sales.

      (7)
      Netthe reclassification.

      The quarterly earnings (loss), divided by average stockholders' equity. Average stockholders' equity isper share amounts will not necessarily add to the earnings per share computed on a 13 month average beginningfor the year due to the method used in 2001.

      (8)
      Net earnings (loss), divided by average total assets.

      (9)
      Debt divided by debt, stockholders' equity and minority interests.

      (10)
      Ratio of earnings before interest and income tax expense to interest expense.

      (11)
      Stock appreciation plus reinvested dividends.

      calculating per share data.

      FIVE-YEAR SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

      (Millions of dollars, except share and employee data)

        2007  2006  2005  2004  2003

      CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

              

      Net sales

        $19,408  $18,080  $14,317  $13,220  $12,176

      Operating profit(1)

         1,063   823   792   758   830

      Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and other items

         804   619   597   616   652

      Earnings from continuing operations

         647   486   422   406   414

      Loss from discontinued operations(2)

         (7)  (53)        

      Net earnings available to common stockholders

         640   433   422   406   414

      Net capital expenditures

         536   576   494   511   423

      Depreciation

         562   520   440   443   423

      Dividends

         134   130   116   116   94

      CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION

              

      Current assets

        $6,555  $6,517  $4,763  $4,514  $3,865

      Current liabilities

         5,893   6,043   4,354   3,985   3,589

      Working capital

         662   474   409   529   276

      Property, plant and equipment-net

         3,212   3,157   2,511   2,583   2,456

      Total assets

         14,009   13,759   8,301   8,181   7,361

      Long-term debt

         1,668   1,798   745   1,160   1,134

      Stockholders’ equity

         3,911   3,283   1,745   1,606   1,301

      PER SHARE DATA

              

      Basic earnings from continuing operations before accounting change

        $8.24  $6.47  $6.30  $6.02  $6.03

      Diluted earnings from continuing operations before accounting change

         8.10   6.35   6.19   5.90   5.91

      Diluted net earnings

         8.01   5.67   6.19   5.90   5.91

      Dividends

         1.72   1.72   1.72   1.72   1.36

      Book value

         48.96   42.93   25.54   23.31   18.56

      Closing Stock Price—NYSE

         81.63   83.02   83.76   69.21   72.65

      KEY RATIOS

              

      Operating profit margin

         5.5%   4.6%   5.5%   5.7%   6.8%

      Pre-tax margin(3)

         4.1%   3.4%   4.2%   4.7%   5.4%

      Net margin(4)

         3.3%   2.7%   2.9%   3.1%   3.4%

      Return on average stockholders’ equity(5)

         18.1%   15.7%   24.6%   30.3%   42.9%

      Return on average total assets(6)

         4.6%   3.9%   5.1%   5.2%   5.9%

      Current assets to current liabilities

         1.1   1.1   1.1   1.1   1.1

      Total debt-appliance business as a percent of invested capital(7)

         34.5%   41.2%   40.4%   45.7%   50.9%

      Price earnings ratio

         10.2   14.6   13.5   11.7   12.3

      Interest coverage(8)

         4.7   3.8   5.6   5.8   5.7

      OTHER DATA

              

      Number of common shares outstanding (in thousands):

              

      Average—on a diluted basis

         79,880   76,471   68,272   68,902   70,082

      Year-end

         75,835   78,484   67,880   66,604   68,931

      Number of stockholders (year-end)

         15,011   15,311   7,442   7,826   8,178

      Number of employees (year-end)

         73,682   73,416   65,682   68,125   68,407

      Total return to shareholders (five year annualized)(9)

         11.8%   4.9%   14.5%   3.7%   8.1%

      (1)Restructuring charges were $61 million in 2007, $55 million in 2006, $57 million in 2005, $15 million in 2004 and $3 million in 2003.

      (2)Our earnings from continuing operations exclude certain dispositions adjacent to the Maytag acquisition.

      (3)Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and other items, as a percent of sales.

      (4)Earnings from continuing operations, as a percent of sales.

      (5)Net earnings (loss), divided by average stockholders’ equity.

      (6)Net earnings (loss), divided by average total assets.

      (7)Debt divided by debt, stockholders’ equity and minority interests.

      (8)Ratio of earnings before interest and income tax expense to interest expense.

      (9)Stock appreciation plus reinvested dividends.

      Report by Management on the Consolidated Financial Statements

      The management of Whirlpool Corporation has prepared the accompanying financial statements. The financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, whose report, based upon their audits, expresses the opinion that these financial statements present fairly the consolidated financial position, resultsstatements of operationsincome and cash flows of Whirlpool and its subsidiaries in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Their audits are conducted in conformity with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

      The financial statements were prepared from the Company'sCompany’s accounting records, books and accounts which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect all material transactions. The Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company'sCompany’s books and records, and the Company'sCompany’s assets are maintained and accounted for, in accordance with management'smanagement’s authorizations. The Company'sCompany’s accounting records, policies and internal controls are regularly reviewed by an internal audit staff.

      The audit committee of the Board of Directors of the Company is composed of five independent directors who, in the opinion of the board, meet the relevant financial experience, literacy, and expertise requirements. The audit committee provides independent and objective oversight of the Company'sCompany’s accounting functions and internal controls and monitors (1) the objectivity of the Company'sCompany’s financial statements, (2) the Company'sCompany’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent registered public accounting firm'sfirm’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of the Company'sCompany’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. In performing these functions, the committee has the responsibility to review and discuss the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements and related reports with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including the Company'sCompany’s disclosures under "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," to monitor the adequacy of financial disclosure. The Committeecommittee also has the responsibility to retain and terminate the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm and exercise the committee'scommittee’s sole authority to review and approve all audit engagement fees and terms and preapprovepre-approve the nature, extent, and cost of all non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

      /s/ ROY W. TEMPLIN


      /s/    ROY W. TEMPLIN        
      Roy W. Templin
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      February 22, 2008


      Roy W. Templin
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      February 28, 2006


      Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      The management of Whirlpool Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Whirlpool'sreporting as defined in Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Whirlpool’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company'sWhirlpool’s management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

      All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

      The management of Whirlpool assessed the effectiveness of the Company'sWhirlpool’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005.2007. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control—Integrated Framework.Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the CompanyWhirlpool maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005.2007.

      Whirlpool Corporation'sWhirlpool’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on ourits assessment of the Company'sWhirlpool’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page F-61.F-59.

      /s/JEFF    JEFF M. FETTIGFETTIG      
      /s/    ROY W. TEMPLIN        

      Jeff M. Fettig

      Chairman of the Board and
      Chief Executive Officer
      February 28, 2006

       /s/ROY W. TEMPLIN

      Roy W. Templin

      Executive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer

      February 28, 200622, 2008

      February 22, 2008


      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

      The Stockholders and Board of Directors

      Whirlpool Corporation

      Benton Harbor, Michigan

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Whirlpool Corporation as of December 31, 20052007 and 2004,2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005.2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Whirlpool Corporation at December 31, 20052007 and 2004,2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005,2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statementstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

      As described in Note 13 of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123(R),Share-Based Payments. As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective December 31, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for freight and warehousing costs.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Whirlpool Corporation'sCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 200622, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

      Chicago, Illinois
      February 28, 2006



      /s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

      Chicago, Illinois

      February 22, 2008

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

      on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      The Stockholders and Board of Directors

      Whirlpool Corporation

      Benton Harbor, Michigan

      We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Whirlpool Corporation maintained effectiveCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Whirlpool Corporation'sCorporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      In our opinion, management's assessment that Whirlpool Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Whirlpool Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,2007, based on the COSO criteria.criteria.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Whirlpool Corporation as of December 31, 20052007 and 2004,2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20052007 of Whirlpool Corporation and our report dated February 28, 200622, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
      Chicago, Illinois
      February 28, 2006

      /s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

      Chicago, Illinois

      February 22, 2008


      SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

      Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004,2007, 2006 and 2003

      2005

      (millions of dollars)

      COL. A
       COL. B
       COL. C
       COL. D
       COL. E
       
        
       ADDITIONS
        
        
      Description
       Balance at Beginning
      of Period

       (1)
      Charged to Costs
      and Expenses

       (2)
      Charged to Other
      Accounts / Other

       Deductions — Describe
       Balance at End
      of Period

      Year Ended December 31, 2005:               
      Allowances for doubtful accounts — trade receivables $107 $7 $ $38 — A $76
        
       
       
       
       
      Year Ended December 31, 2004:               
      Allowances for doubtful accounts — trade receivables $113 $17 $ $23 — A $107
        
       
       
       
       
      Year Ended December 31, 2003:               
      Allowances for doubtful accounts — trade receivables $94 $34 $ $15 — A $113
        
       
       
       
       

      COL. A

       COL. B COL. C COL. D  COL. E
        Balance at Beginning
      of Period
       ADDITIONS Deductions
      —Describe
        Balance at End
      of Period

      Description

        (1)
      Charged to Costs
      and Expenses
       (2)
      Charged to Other
      Accounts / Other
        

      Year Ended December 31, 2007:

           

      Allowance for doubtful accounts—trade receivables

       $84 $19 $—   $(20) —A $83

      Year Ended December 31, 2006:

           

      Allowance for doubtful accounts—trade receivables

        76  19  14 —B  (25) —A  84

      Year Ended December 31, 2005:

           

      Allowance for doubtful accounts—trade receivables

        107  7  —    (38) —A  76

      Note A—The amounts represent accounts charged off, less recoveries of $1 million$0 in 2005,2007, $0 million in 2004,2006, and $1 million$0 in 2003,2005, translation adjustments and transfers.


      Note B—The amount represents allowances for doubtful accounts recorded as part of the Maytag acquisition.


      ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

      ITEMS 15(a)(3) and 15(c)

      EXHIBIT INDEX

      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
      2007

      The following exhibits are submitted herewith or incorporated herein by reference in response to Items 15(a)(3) and 15(c). Each exhibit that is considered a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K is identified by a "(Z)“(Z)."

      Number and Description of Exhibit







      2

        



      Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 22, 2005, among Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Acquisition Co. and Maytag Corporation. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed August 22, 2005.] [File No. 1-3932]


      3(i)
        



      Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993] [File No. 1-3932]


      3(ii)
        



      Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company as amended August 17, 1999.and restated June 19, 2007. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company's Annual Report onCompany’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999] [File No. 1-3932]8-K filed June 22, 2007]


      4(i)
        



      The registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of instruments defining the rights of holders of each issue of long-term debt of the registrant and its subsidiaries.


      4(ii)
        



      Rights Agreement, dated April 21, 1998, between Whirlpool Corporation and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, with exhibits. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed April 27, 1998] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      4(iii)

      Indenture between Whirlpool Corporation and Citibank, N.A., dated as of March 20, 2000 [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3]

      4(iv)

      Indenture dated as of June 15, 1987 between Maytag Corporation and The First National Bank of Chicago. [Incorporated by reference from Maytag Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1987]

      4(v)

      First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 1, 1989 between Maytag Corporation and The First National Bank of Chicago. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to Maytag Corporation’s Form 8-K dated September 28, 1989]

      4(vi)

      Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 30, 2001 between Maytag Corporation and Bank One, National Association. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to Maytag Corporation’s Form 8-K dated October 31, 2001]

      10(iii)(a)
        

      Amended and Restated Long-Term Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005 among Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Europe B.V., Whirlpool Finance B.V., Certain Financial Institutions and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Fronting Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agents, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed December 6, 2005] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)


      (b)


      364-Day Credit Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005 among Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Europe B.V., Whirlpool Finance B.V., Certain Financial Institutions and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Fronting Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agents, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed December 6, 2005] [File No. 1-3932]
      10(iii)(b)  



      10(iii)


      (c)


      Indenture between Whirlpool Corporation and Citibank, N.A., dated as of March 20, 2000 [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3] [File No. 333-32886]

      10(iii)


      (d)


      Whirlpool Corporation Nonemployee Director Stock Ownership Plan (as amended February 16, 1999, effective April 20, 1999).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit A to the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the 1999 annual meeting of stockholders] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(c)
      (e)


      Whirlpool Corporation Charitable Award Contribution and Additional Life Insurance Plan for Directors (effective April 20, 1993).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(p) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994] [File No. 1-3932]


      Number and Description of Exhibit

      10(iii)(d)
        

      (f)


      Nonemployee director compensation arrangement (effective January 1, 2005).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Item 1.01(i) - Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, of the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2004] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(e)
      (g)


      Whirlpool Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (as amended effective January 1, 1992 and April 20, 1993).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(f) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(f)
      (h)


      Whirlpool Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan II for Non-Employee Directors (effective January 1, 2005).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2004] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(g)
      (i)


      Whirlpool Corporation Nonemployee Director Equity Plan (effective January 1, 2005).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on April 21, 2005] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(h)
      (j)


      Whirlpool Corporation 1989 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (as amended, July 1, 1991).(Z) [Incorporated by reference tofrom Exhibit 10(iii)(h) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993] [File No. 1-3932]1993


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(i)
      (k)


      Amendment of the Whirlpool Corporation 1989 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, (as amended, June 20, 1995).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(r) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(j)
      (l)


      Whirlpool Corporation 1996 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (as amended, effective February 16, 1999).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(r) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999] [File No. 1-3932]

      10(iii)(k)  



      10(iii)


      (m)


      Whirlpool Corporation 1998 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (as amended, effective February 16, 1999).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(s) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(l)
      (n)


      Whirlpool Corporation 2000 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (effective January 1, 2000).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit A to the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the 2000 annual meeting of stockholders] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(m)
      (o)


      Whirlpool Corporation 2002 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (effective January 1, 2002).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit A to the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 annual meeting of stockholders] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(n)
      (p)


      Administrative Guidelines for the

      Whirlpool Corporation Restricted Stock Value Program (pursuant to one or more of Whirlpool's2007 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plans)Plan (effective January 1, 2007).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(i)Annex A to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KCompany’s Proxy Statement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993] [File 1-3932]2007 annual meeting of stockholders]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(o)
      (q)


      Form of Agreement for the Whirlpool Corporation Career Stock Grant Program (pursuant to one or more of Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plans).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(q) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(p)
      (r)


      Form of Stock Option Grant Document for the Whirlpool Corporation Stock Option Program (pursuant to one or more of Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plans)(Rev. 02/17/04).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2005] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(q)
      (s)


      Administrative Guidelines for the Whirlpool Corporation Special Retention Program (pursuant to one or more of Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plans).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(w) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001] [File No. 1-3932]


      Number and Description of Exhibit

      10(iii)(r)
        

      (t)


      Form of Whirlpool Corporation Strategic Excellence Program Grant Document (pursuant to one or more of Whirlpool'sWhirlpool’s Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plans)(Rev. 02/17/04).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(ii) to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2005] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(s)
      (u)


      Form of Agreements providing for severance benefits for certain executive officers.(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed April 27, 2000] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(t)
      (v)


      Whirlpool Corporation Performance Excellence Plan (as amended January 1, 1992, January 1, 1994 , January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2004).Plan.(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit A to the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders] [File No. 1-3932]

      10(iii)(u)  



      10(iii)


      (w)


      Whirlpool Corporation Executive Deferred Savings Plan (as amended effective January 1, 1992).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(n) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(v)
      (x)

      Whirlpool Corporation Executive Deferred Savings Plan II (effective as of January 1, 2005), including Supplement A, Whirlpool Executive Restoration Plan (effective as of January 1, 2007).(Z)


      10(iii)(w)

      Whirlpool Corporation Executive Officer Bonus Plan (effective as of January 1, 1994).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(o) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(x)
      (y)


      Whirlpool Corporation Key Employee Treasury Stock Ownership Plan (effective October 16, 2001).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(u) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(y)
      (z)


      Employment Agreement with Paulo F.M.O. Periquito, dated January 1, 1998.(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(z)
      (aa)


      Whirlpool Retirement Benefits Restoration Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(a) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(aa)
      (bb)


      Whirlpool Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (as amended and restated effective December 31, 1993).(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii)(c) to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993] [File No. 1-3932]


      10(iii)

      10(iii)(bb)
      (cc)


      Whirlpool Corporation Form of Indemnity Agreement.(Z) [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2006] [File No. 1-3932]


      11




      Computation of Earnings Per Share

      12

        



      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


      21
        



      List of Subsidiaries


      23.1

      23
        


      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


      24
        



      Power of Attorney


      31(a)
        



      Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      31(b)
        



      Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      32
        



      Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




      QuickLinks

      PART I
      PART II
      PART III
      PART IV
      SIGNATURES
      Table of Contents
      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Year Ended December 31 (Millions of dollars, except per share data)
      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Millions of dollars)
      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Year ended December 31 (Millions of dollars)
      WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Year ended December 31 (Millions of dollars)
      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
      SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 (millions of dollars)
      ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ITEMS 15(a)(3) and 15(c) EXHIBIT INDEX YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

      E-3