QuickLinks-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

(Mark One) 

ý


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20072010

OR

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to                         .

Commission file number 0-16244



VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
 11-2989601
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

100 Sunnyside Boulevard, Suite BTerminal Drive
Woodbury,Plainview, New York

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

1179711803
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code(516) 677-0200

Website:www.veeco.com

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

         Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes o    No ýo

         Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by references in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ýo

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes    ý No

         The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the common stock on June 30, 200727, 2010 as reported on The Nasdaq National Market, was $643,829,373.$1,566,934,944. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

At February 25, 2008,22, 2011, the Registrant had 31,865,62340,616,024 outstanding shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

         Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 200819, 2011 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Items 1, 3, 7 and 7A hereof, as well as within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "estimates," "plans," "intends,""intends" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:



        Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as the Company's current plans, estimates, and beliefs. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.



Item 1.    Business

The Company

        Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, "Veeco," the "Company" or "we") designs, manufactures and markets and services a broad line of equipment primarily used by manufacturers in the data storage, high brightness light emitting diode ("HB-LED"), solar, wireless, and semiconductor industries. These industries help create a wide range of information age products such as computer integrated circuits, personal computers,to make light emitting diodes ("LEDs") for backlighting and automotive applications, hard disk drives ("HDDs"), solar panels, network servers, digital cameras, wireless phones, digital video recorders, personal music/video players, and personal digital assistants. Our broad line of products feature leading edge technology and allow customers to improve time-to-market of their next generation products. Veeco's products also enable advancements in the growing fields of nanoscience, nanobiology,hard-disk drives and other areasdevices. We have leading technology positions in our two segments: Light Emitting Diode ("LED") & Solar and Data Storage.

        In our LED & Solar segment, we design and manufacture metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, Copper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide ("CIGS") deposition systems and thermal deposition sources that we sell to manufacturers of scientifichigh brightness LEDs ("HB LED") and industrial research.solar panels, as well as to research customers.

        Our Process Equipment products precisely deposit or remove (etch) various thin film materials. Our key Process Equipment technologies includeIn our Data Storage segment, we design and manufacture ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond likediamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing productssystems that are primarily used to create thin film magnetic heads ("TFMHs") that read and write data on hard drives, as well asdisk drives.

        We support our metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD")customers through product development, manufacturing, and molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") products sold to manufacturers of HB-LEDs, solar panels,sales and wireless telecommunications devices.

        Our Metrology equipment (atomic force microscopes, or AFMs, stylus profilers, and optical interferometers) is used to provide critical surface measurements in research and production environments. In production, our equipment allows customers, such as those in semiconductor and data storage, to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process in order to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality. We also sell our broad line of AFMs, scanning probe microscopes ("SPMs"), optical interferometers, and stylus profilers to thousands of universities, research facilities, and scientific centers worldwide to enable a variety of nanotechnology related research.

        Demand for many of our products has been driven by the increasing miniaturization of microelectronic components, the need for manufacturers to meet reduced time-to-market schedules while ensuring the quality of those components and,service sites in the data storage industry, the introduction of tunneling magnetoresistive ("TMR") TFMHsU.S., Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and perpendicular recording technology which require additional manufacturing steps, new materials, and the ability to take critical measurements for quality control and yield management during the manufacturing process. The ability of our products to precisely deposit thin films, and/or etch sub-micron patterns and make critical surface measurements in these components enables manufacturers to improve yields and quality in the fabrication of advanced microelectronic devices. Veeco's core Process Equipment and Metrology technologies continue to find new applications for adoption across many technology applications.other locations.

        Veeco Instruments was organized as a Delaware corporation in 1989.

Our Strategy

        Our strategy for growth and improved profitability focuses on the following key activities:



        We serve our worldwide customers through our global salesBusiness Overview and service organization located throughout the United States, Europe, Japan, and Asia Pacific. At December 31, 2007, we had 1,216 employees, with manufacturing, research and development, and engineering facilities located in New York, Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, and New Jersey.

Industry BackgroundTrends

        General Introduction:    Continued demand for smaller, faster, and less expensive microelectronic components, particularly in the consumer electronics industry, has led to increasing miniaturization of products. This miniaturization is achieved through an increased number of manufacturing steps involving greater use of precise etching and deposition equipment. In addition, metrology systems are used throughout the manufacturing process in order to monitor process accuracy, product quality, repeatability, and to measure critical dimensions and other physical features such as film thickness, line width, step height, sidewall angle, and surface roughness, thereby improving yields. Wireless components, semiconductor, and compound semiconductor devices, TFMHs, HB-LEDs, and other electronic components often consist of many intricate patterns on circuits or film layers. Depending upon the specific design of any given integrated circuit, a variety of film thicknesses, and a number of layers and film types will be used to achieve desired performance characteristics. Veeco'sOur thin film deposition, etch and measurementother technologies are applicable to the creation of a broad range of microelectronic components, including HB LEDs, solar cells, thin film magnetic heads and compound semiconductor devices. Our customers who manufacture these devices continue to invest in new technology applicationsequipment in order to advance their next generation products and deliver more efficient and cost effective technology solutions.

        Following the data storage, HB-LED/wireless, solarglobal recession, Veeco experienced a rapid improvement in business conditions in late 2009 and semiconductor industriescontinuing into 2010. The combination of an improvement in capital spending by our global customers as well as in scientific research. Current trends in each of theseour focus on high-growth end markets, are discussed below.

        Trends inparticularly HB LED, and successful new product introduction enabled the Data Storage Industry:    Worldwide storage demand continuesCompany to increase, driven by intelligent internet storage, e-commerce, e-mail, and new consumer applications now reaching higher volume. While much has been written about the competition HDDs facebenefit from flash memory, we believe that HDDs will continue to provide the best value for mass storage and will remain at the forefront of large capacity storage applications for years to come. In fact, the use of disk drives in many types of consumer applications has resulted inaccelerated growth in the number of hard drive units shipped, which is expected to continue. According to data storage research firm IDC's 2007 report, consumer electronic applications of HDDs are forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") of 9% from 2006 to 2011. In addition, we believe that the potential competition from flash will lead HDD manufacturers to continue to pursue advances in areal density (storage) in order to stay ahead on a price/performance basis. In August 2007, TrendFocus, a data storage research organization, forecasted that TFMH production will grow at a CAGR of approximately 6% from 2006 through 2011.2010.

        In order to satisfy market demand for devices with greater storage capacity,The following is a review of our two reportable segments and the data storage industry has developed new head designs by incorporating higher areal densities, which enable storage of more data. The capacity of disk drives is largely determined by the capability of the magnetic recording heads, which read and write signals onto hard disks. The data storage industry continues to fund the development of new high-density thin film headmulti-year technology increasing areal density by approximately 35% to 40% every year, according to industry analysts at IDC. The industry's move to perpendicular recording (PMR) in 2006 and 2007 allows hard drive manufacturers to put more bits of data on each square inch of disk space because of changes in the magnetic geometry. PMR requirestrends that impact each.



thinner films, more layers, and more complicated process equipment and metrology solutions from companies such as Veeco.

        While technology change continues in data storage, the industry is going through a period of vertical integration and consolidation that has led to capital constraint. In 2007, two of Veeco's key customers combined operations and another customer closed a large manufacturing facility. This caused a significant decline in Veeco's data storage revenues last year. As a result of this consolidation and evolving customer landscape, Veeco has taken several important actions to right-size our data storage businesses and product lines. We are refocusing our research and development and engineering efforts, have discontinued two product lines, and are consolidating facilities. We continue to maintain our commitment to our data storage customers and believe we are well-aligned to their technology requirements and demand for lower cost of ownership tools. We believe that one particular area of growth for us in 2008 and 2009 will be our customers' conversion to larger wafer sizes, which will require significant retooling.

        Trends in the HB-LED/Wireless Industry:LED & Solar Business Overview and Trends:    Veeco isWe are a leading supplier of process equipment and metrology solutions used to create a broad range of compound semiconductor based devices such as mobile cell phones, wireless local area networks,HB LEDs and high-brightness blue/green/red/orange/yellow LEDs for applications such as general illumination and backlighting. We are the only supplier of both MOCVD and MBE systems, the two key epitaxial deposition technologies used for wireless, solar and HB-LED applications.cells. MOCVD and MBE technologies are used to grow compound semiconductor materials (such as GaAs (gallium arsenide), GaN (gallium nitride), As/P (arsenic phosphide) and InP (indium phosphide)) at the atomic scale. Epitaxy is the critical first step in compound semiconductor wafer fabrication and is considered to be the highest value added process, ultimately determining device functionality and performance. The combination of MOCVD and MBE increases our customer base and total available market, and provides us with unique market positioning opportunities.

        Strategies Unlimited, an LED industry research organization, forecasts that the market for HB-LEDs will grow from $4.18 billion in 2006 to $9.40 billion in 2011, for a CAGR of 17.6%. LEDs are becoming increasingly more prevalent in automotive applications, flat panel displays, and other backlighting applications.        We believe that the HB-LEDHB LED market, while cyclical, represents a high-growth opportunity for Veecous due to the expanding applications for HB-LEDs,HB LEDs, such as backlighting for large screen flat panel TVs (laser(LCD—liquid crystal diodes—LCDs)displays), laptop computers, automotive applications, and general illumination. WhileIn 2009 and 2010 the overall HB-LEDLED industry experienced significant growth as LEDs penetrated laptop and television backlighting applications. Strategies Unlimited, an LED industry research organization, forecasted in its June 2010 report that growth in these applications will continue, resulting in a compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") exceeding 80% from 2009 through 2014. LEDs are also starting to experience increased adoption for general lighting, with Strategies Unlimited forecasting a CAGR of 45.4% during that same time period. Overall, the market for HB LEDs is forecastedexpected to grow at nearly 18% annually as stated above, certain applications are forecastedfrom $5.4 billion in 2009 to grow at higher rates. For example, LEDs$19.6 billion in 2014, for architectural and retail lighting are forecasted to grow nearly 40% over the next several years. The HB-LED/wireless portiona CAGR of our business experienced the highest revenue growth rate of all of our businesses in both 2006 and 2007.29.5%.

        In order to gain market share in light ofand capitalize on this growth opportunity, we have introducedaccelerated our R&D investments to introduce several generations of MOCVD tools, most recently our TurboDisc® K-Series™ and MaxBright™ MOCVD systems. By introducing new systems, we are focused on delivering better uniformity and repeatability, which helps our customers to make higher-brightness HB-LEDs.HB LEDs of consistent quality, ultimately with the goal to deliver more, high quality LEDs at a lower manufacturing cost. We also intend to continue to invest heavily in research and development and engineering in order to deliver more advanced MOCVD solutions to our customers. We remain optimistic about the growth opportunity resulting from providing enabling equipment to the HB-LED industry.

A related compound semiconductor application for Veecous is in the solar market. Veeco currently sells ourmarket, since the same MOCVD toolstool that is critical to manufacturers ofthe LED manufacturing process can also be used to manufacture high-efficiency triple junction solar cells as well our thermal deposition sourcescells. The Company currently sells a small number of MOCVD systems each year for this concentrator solar (CPV) application and is also beginning to manufacturers of CIGS (cadmium, indium, gallium, selenide)sell tools to an emerging growth market for power devices.

        Veeco has also identified the thin film solar panels. The solar industry is emergingcell market as aoffering significant new market opportunity for Veeco.growth opportunities. The global energy dilemma is resulting inhas triggered a significant amount of new research and spending intoin solar technologies as an alternative energy solution, since it is non-polluting and has the potential to supply the world with high



energy efficiency at low cost. While many of today's solar panels are based upon older silicon technologies, thin film CIGS solar cells offer the potential for lower manufacturing costs, and CIGS offer new, low cost manufacturing technologies withhave the promisehighest efficiency of higher Solar Panel Photovoltaic ("PV") efficiency.the thin film technologies. According to Bank of America, thin film photovoltaic technologies will grow from lessan October 2010 report released by Greentech Media Research ("GTM"), CIGS module manufacturing costs are projected to be lower than 5% of production in 2005 to over 20% in 2010.those associated with silicon wafer-based modules. CIGS solar panels have broad-based end market applications for solar farms, commercial and residential rooftops, building integrated and building applied PV (BIPV/BAPV) and portable devices.

        Since PV manufacturers often build their own equipment, there is a market opportunity emerging for equipment suppliers such as Veeco. In its October 2010 report, GTM forecasted that CIGS global module capacity will have a CAGR of 49% from 2010 to 2013 with capacity reaching 3.4GW in 2013. We plan to expand our deposition product line to create "best of breed" deposition systems that can deposit materials on flexible (stainless steel) or rigid (glass) substrates. Today Veeco supplies thermal evaporation components to over 50% of CIGS companies worldwide and has begun to penetrate CIGS customers with our deposition system solutions. We are shipping our FastFlex Web Coating Systems for the front and back contact and absorber layer CIGS deposition. These new systems are capable of processing up to 1m web widths that will enable PV manufacturers to continue lowering their cost of ownership. We intend to increase our research and development spending in CIGS technology for both the rigid and flexible substrate market since we believe it offers a significant growth opportunity over the next several years.


        TrendsData Storage Business Overview and Trends:    Worldwide storage demand continues to increase, driven by proliferation of laptop and netbook PC's, intelligent internet storage, e-mail, external storage devices, and new consumer applications (e.g. digital video recorders) now reaching higher volume. While much has been written about the competition hard disk drives ("HDDs") face from flash memory, we believe that HDDs will continue to provide the best value for mass storage and will remain at the forefront of large capacity storage applications. In fact, the use of disk drives in many types of consumer applications has resulted in growth in the Scientific Researchnumber of hard drive units shipped, which is expected to continue. According to data storage research firm TrendFocus' February 2011 report, consumer electronic applications of HDDs are forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 9.4% from 2010 to 2015.

        While technology change continues in data storage, the industry has gone through a period of maturation, including vertical integration and Industrial Industry:    Our broad based research business has historically tracked the growth of the economy and Gross Domestic Product, as ourconsolidation. Veeco is focused on remaining a valued equipment and instruments are used in a wide range of industrial applications. A meaningful trend in the research industry is the growth in nanotechnology investment occurring at the scientific and university level. Nanotechnology is the ability to design and control the structure of an object at all lengths from the atom upsupplier to the macro scale.

        Nanoscience and nanotechnology have received significant funding from the U.S. government and other countries, and are beginning to impact many industries, including life sciences, data storage semiconductor, telecommunications, and materials sciences. According to Lux Research Inc., global nanotechnology spending reached approximately $13 billion in 2007, consisting of a combination of government, industry and venture capital funding. Our metrology instruments are used by nanotechnology researchers, and we currently sell to most major scientific and research organizations engaged in the field of nanotechnology. We continue to introduce new AFMs and SPMs to respondis well-aligned to the growing needindustry's technology requirements and demand for specialized scientific research metrologylower cost of ownership tools.

        Trends Veeco has restructured and refocused its Data Storage business around core technologies where we have a leadership position and utilize a flexible manufacturing strategy. A recovery in the Semiconductor Industry:    Current semiconductor industry technology trends include smaller feature sizes (sub-0.10 micron line widths), larger substrates (i.e., 300 mm wafers), and the increased use of metrology in the manufacturing process. According to VLSI, a semiconductor research organization, the percentage of capital expenditures devoted to metrology toolsspending by semiconductor manufacturers is a faster growing part of the equipment business. Semiconductor manufacturers use metrology tools in their wafer fabrication facilities to detect process deviations as early in the manufacturing process as possible. These tools are critical for yield enhancement resulting in cost reduction in this increasingly competitive environment.

        We have sold over 450 automated AFM systems used in-line by manufacturers of semiconductor chips in their fabrication facilities. Our AFMs are used by all of the top 10 integrated device manufacturers worldwide. Our family of non-destructive AFM products includes our Vx Series™ Atomic Force Profilers, which combine AFM resolution with long-scan capability and are well-suited for chemical-mechanical planarization ("CMP") and etch depth measurements; our X3D™ AFM for advanced lithography and photomask applications; and our Dimension® X AFM for advanced etch measurements. In late 2007, we launched our next generation auto AFM tool, the InSight™ 3DAFM, the only metrology system availablekey Data Storage customers, combined with the accuracy and precision requiredsuccessful introduction of several new deposition tools to advance areal density technologies, enabled Veeco to report a strong growth year in 2010. Going forward, Veeco's product development team has begun to identify non-hard drive market applications (such as LED) for non-destructive, high resolution three-dimensional ("3D") measurements of critical 45nm and 32nm semiconductor features, with the speed to qualify as a true fab tool. Veeco's InSight 3DAFM was designed specifically to address Critical Dimension ("CD"), depth and CMP metrology in a production environment. While the outlook for capital expenditures by semiconductor manufacturers in 2008 is currently not favorable, Veeco believes that this new tool offers a unique technology solution for its customers and will provide an avenue of potential growth for the Company.


our key Data Storage technologies.

Veeco'sOur Products

        We have two business segments, Process EquipmentLED & Solar and Metrology.Data Storage. Net sales for these business segments is shown below forare illustrated in the years indicated:following table:

 
 Year ended December 31,
 
 
 2007
 2006
 2005
 
 
 (Dollars in millions)

 
Process Equipment $252.0 $268.9 $227.9 
 % of net sales  62.6% 61.0% 55.5%
Metrology $150.5 $172.1 $182.3 
 % of net sales  37.4% 39.0% 44.5%
Total net sales $402.5 $441.0 $410.2 

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

LED & Solar

 $797.9 $205.2 $165.8 
 

% of net sales

  85.5% 72.7% 52.7%

Data Storage

 $135.3 $77.2 $149.1 
 

% of net sales

  14.5% 27.3% 47.3%

Total net sales

 $933.2 $282.4 $314.9 

        See Note 811 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our reportable segments and sales by geographic location.

Process EquipmentLED & Solar

        Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition Systems:    We produceare one of the world's leading suppliers of MOCVD technology. MOCVD production systems are used to make GaN-based devices (green and sell several types ofblue HB LEDs) and As/P-based devices (red, orange, and yellow HB LEDs), which are used today in television and laptop backlighting, general illumination, large area signage, specialty illumination and many other applications. Our As/P MOCVD Systems also are used to make high-efficiency concentrator solar cells.

        Molecular Beam Epitaxy Systems:    MBE is the process equipment products capable of precisely depositing epitaxially aligned atomically thin crystal layers, or etchingepilayers, of elemental materials onto a substrate in an ultra-high vacuum environment. For many compound semiconductors, MBE is the critical first step of the fabrication process, ultimately determining device functionality and performance. We provide a broad



array of MBE components and systems for research and production applications and thermal evaporation sources for the CIGS solar industry.

        Web and Glass Coaters for Thin Film Solar Cells:    We are a manufacturer of web deposition equipment used to make CIGS solar cells. We have expanded our product line to include "best of breed" solutions that perform the critical CIGS deposition steps on flexible and rigid (glass) substrates. We believe that our FastFlex™ and FastLine™ systems offer high throughput and excellent performance for thin film products, primarily used in the manufacturesolar cell production, contributing to a lower cost of data storage components such as TFMHs and compound semiconductor/wireless devices. Our process equipment product line includes:ownership for our customers.

Data Storage

        Ion Beam Deposition ("IBD") Systems:    Our NEXUS® IBD systems utilize ion beam technology to deposit precise layers of thin films and may be included on our cluster system platform to allow either parallel or sequential etch/deposition processes. IBD systems deposit high purity thin film layers and provide maximum uniformity and repeatability. In addition to IBD systems, we provide a broad array of ion beam sources.

        Ion Beam Etch ("IBE") Systems:    We develop and produceOur NEXUS IBE systems which etch precise, complex features for use primarily by data storage and telecommunications device manufacturers in the fabrication of discrete and integrated microelectronic devices.

        Physical Vapor Deposition ("PVD") Systems:    Our NEXUS PVD systems offer manufacturers a highly flexible deposition platform for developing next-generation data storage and compound semiconductor applications.

        Diamond-Like Carbon ("DLC") Deposition Systems:    Our DLC deposition systems deposit protective coatings on advanced TFMHs. The system consists of a single cassette vacuum loadlock and a high vacuum processing chamber with two ion beam sources.

        Chemical Vapor Deposition ("CVD") Systems:    Our NEXUS CVD systems, introduced to the market in 2008, deposit conformal films for advanced TFMH applications.

        Precision Lapping, Slicing, and Dicing Systems:    Our Optium® Slider process equipment products generally are used in "back-end" applications in a data storage fab where TFMHs or "sliders" are fabricated. This equipment includes lapping tools, which enable precise material removal within three nanometers, which is necessary for next generation TFMHs. We also manufacture instruments that slice and dice wafers into rowbars and TFMHs.

        Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition Systems:    Veeco is one of the world's leading suppliers of MOCVD technology. These MOCVD production systems grow gallium nitride-based devices, (green and blue HB-LEDs) and arsenic phosphide based devices (red, orange, and yellow HB-LEDs), which are used today in large area signage, mobile device backlighting, and specialty illumination.

        Molecular Beam Epitaxy Systems:    MBE is the process of precisely depositing epitaxially aligned atomically thin crystal layers, or epilayers, of elemental materials onto a substrate in an ultra-high vacuum environment. For many compound semiconductors, MBE is the critical first step of the fabrication process, ultimately determining device functionality and performance. We provide a broad



array of MBE components and systems for research and production applications and, in 2007, introduced a new line of MBE components for the solar industry.

Metrology

        Our surface metrology product line includes atomic force/scanning probe microscopes, optical metrology tools, and stylus profilers. These products offer a broad range of solutions to customers in the data storage and semiconductor industries, as well as versatile tools for use by research and development centers and universities.

        Atomic Force/Scanning Probe Microscopes:    We produce a broad range of AFM/SPM products designed for data storage, semiconductor and research and other industrial applications. Our family of automated, non-destructive AFM products include our Vx™ Series Atomic Force Profilers which combine AFM resolution with long-scan capability for CMP applications; our X3D AFM for advanced lithography and photomask applications; and our Dimension X AFM for etch measurements. In 2007, we launched our next generation 3D Automated AFM, the InSight. We also have the world's broadest line of research AFMs and SPMs. Our NanoScope products are widely used by leading nanotechnology research centers worldwide. Veeco was a pioneer of AFM technology, and we continue to develop new products for production and research applications. In 2007, Veeco saw increased usage of several new AFM/SPM products including our BioScope II, Innova and others.

        The atomic force microscope "feels" the sample surface directly using a probe consisting of a very sharp tip or probe mounted on a microscopic spring arm (a cantilever). The interaction of the probe with the surface is detected by measuring deflections of the cantilever with an optical beam system. AFMs, which permit non-destructive measurements and resolution at the molecular level, can directly measure both lateral and vertical shapes with nanometer resolution and with direct 3D capability. In contrast, light-based metrology instruments, including confocal microscopes, have limited lateral resolution for measurements of less than half the wavelength of light, or less than about 250 nanometers. In addition to topography, AFMs can also directly measure the magnetic field (such as magnetic bits on a hard disk); electric field; hardness (such as thin film integrity); electric charge density (such as dopant concentrations in semiconductors); temperature (such as temperature distribution in disk drive recording head elements); and various chemical properties (such as the difference in binding preference among biological molecules). AFMs make these measurements on almost any surface; in air, vacuum or under fluids; and with minimal sample preparation.

        Stylus Profilers:    Stylus profilers are used to produce cross-sectional representations and/or quantitative measurements, which are displayed on a video monitor. Our Dektak® stylus profiler systems utilize a precision translation stage which creates relative motion between the sample and a diamond tipped stylus. As the sample moves under the stylus, surface variations cause vertical translation of the stylus, which is tracked and measured. Stylus profilers are widely used for height, width, pitch, and roughness measurements of features on semiconductor devices, magnetic and optical storage media (such as hard drives), flat panel displays, and hybrid circuits. Stylus profilers are often used for direct contact measurements and to measure larger feature sizes than our AFMs. We believe that our stylus profiler products are recognized for their accuracy, repeatability, ease of use, and technology features, and are designed to meet a range of industry specifications and customer requirements.

        Optical/Stylus Metrology (Interferometry) Products:    Substantially all of our optical metrology instruments are designed to make non-contact surface measurements using interferometry technology. This process involves the use of either white light or laser sources to measure surface roughness and shape by creating interference patterns from the optical path difference between the test surface and a reference surface. Using a combination of phase shifting interferometry and vertical scanning interferometry, these instruments are designed to rapidly and precisely measure and characterize a range of surface sizes and shapes. Our major optical products include the Wyko® NT™ family and



SP3000™ and the HD-Series™ optical profilers. The NT family product line measures surface roughness, heights, and shapes. The HD-Series instruments are a line of microstructure measurement equipment used by manufacturers of mass memory components including manufacturers of TFMHs, disks, drives, and suspensions. HD-Series instruments are used for research and development, process control and improvement, incoming parts inspection, final parts inspection, and field failure analysis.

Service and Sales

        We sell our products and services worldwide through various strategically located sales and service facilities located in the U.S., Europe and Asia Pacific, and Japan, and we believe that our customer service organization is a significant factor in our success. We provide service and support on a warranty, service contract or an individual service-call basis. We also offer enhanced warranty coverage and services, including preventative maintenance plans, on-call and on-site service plans and other comprehensive service arrangements, product and application training, consultation services, and a 24-hour hotline service for certain products. We believe that offering 24 hour, 7 day per week worldwidetimely support creates stronger relationships with customers and provides us with a significant competitive advantage. Revenues from salesthe sale of parts, service and support represented approximately 21%7%, 20%,16% and 19%21% of our net sales for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. Parts sales represented approximately 17%5%, 17%,9% and 15%14% of our net sales for those periods,years, respectively, and service and support sales were 4%2%, 3%,7% and 4%7%, respectively.


Customers

        We sell our products to many of the world's major data storage, semiconductor,HB LED, solar and HB-LED/wireless componenthard drive manufacturers andas well as to customers in other industries, research centers, and universities. For the year ended December 31, 2007, 34% of our sales were to data storage customers, 28% to HB-LED/wireless customers, 29% to scientific research and industrial customers, and 9% to semiconductor customers. We rely on certain principal customers for a significant portion of our sales including Seagate Technology, Inc., and Hitachi, Ltd. which have been two of our largest customers during the last three years.sales. Sales to SeagateLG Innotek Co. Ltd. and Seoul OptoDevice Co. Ltd. each accounted for more than 10%, 18%, and 15% of Veeco's total net sales in 2007, 2006,2010, LG Innotek Co. Ltd. and 2005, respectively. Sales to HitachiSeagate Technology, Inc. each accounted for 7%,more than 10%, and 9% of Veeco's total net sales in 2007, 2006,2009 and 2005, respectively.sales to Seagate Technology, Inc. accounted for 10% or more of Veeco's total net sales in 2008. If any principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic difficulties, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Research and Development

        We believe that continued and timely development of new products and enhancements to existing products are necessary to maintain our competitive position. We work collaboratively with our customers to help ensure our technology and product roadmaps are aligned with customer requirements. Our research and development programs are organized by product line and new or improved products have been introduced into each of our product lines in each of the past three years.

        Our research and development expenses were approximately $61.2$71.4 million, $61.9$43.5 million and $60.4$39.6 million, or approximately 15.2%8%, 14.0%,15% and 14.7%13% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. These expenses consisted primarily of salaries, project material and other product development and enhancement costs.

Suppliers

        We currently outsource and plan to increase the outsourcing of, certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, data storage systems, solar deposition systems and ion beam systems recently introduced by our Process Equipment group. At present, wesources. We primarily rely primarily on a sole supplierseveral suppliers for the majority of the manufacturemanufacturing of these MOCVD and ion beam systems. We plan to maintain internal manufacturing capability for these systems at least until such time as we have qualified one or more alternate suppliers to perform this manufacturing. The failure of this supplierour present suppliers to meet itstheir contractual obligations under our supply arrangementarrangements and our inability to make alternative



arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and relationships with our customers.

        In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.

ManufacturingProduct Development, Marketing and Operations

        Our principal manufacturing activities, which consist principally of assembly,product development, integration, and test operations and assembly, are organized by product and take place at our facilities in Plainview and Clifton Park, New York; Santa Barbara and Camarillo, California; Tucson, Arizona; Ft. Collins, Colorado; Somerset, New Jersey; and St. Paul, Minnesota.

Product OrganizationMinnesota; and Lowell, Massachusetts.

        Our sales, marketing, manufacturing and research and development functions are organized by product families. We believe that this organizational structure allows each product family manager to more closely monitor the products for which he is responsible, resulting in more efficient sales, marketing, manufacturing and research and development. We emphasize customer responsiveness, customer service, high qualityhigh-quality products and an interactive management style. By implementing these



management philosophies, we believe that we have increased our competitiveness and are well-positioned for future growth.

Backlog

        Our backlog increased from $140.8to $555.0 million atas of December 31, 2006 to $173.52010 from $377.3 million atas of December 31, 2007. Backlog2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we experienced net backlog adjustments of $16.4approximately $10.7 million, during 2007 were drivenconsisting of $12.5 million for order adjustments ($10.2 million is related to our Solar and MBE businesses) offset by order cancellations primarily from data storage customers for products that were discontinued.$1.8 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation.

        Our backlog generally consists of product orders for which we received a firm purchase order, has been received and which are scheduled fora customer-confirmed shipment date within twelve months. We schedule production of our systems based on order backlogmonths and customer commitments. Because certain of our orders require products to be shipped in the same quarter in which the order is received, and because changes in delivery schedules, cancellations of orders and delays in shipment are possible, we do not believe that the level of backlog at any point in time is an accurate indicator of our future performance. Due to changing business conditions and customer requirements, we may continue to experience cancellation and/or rescheduling of orders.a deposit, where required.

Competition

        In each of the markets that we serve, we face substantial competition from established competitors, some of which have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than us, as well as from smaller competitors. In addition, many of our products face competition from alternative technologies, some of which are more established than those used in our products. Significant factors for customer selection of metrology and process equipmentour tools include system performance, accuracy, repeatability, ease of use, reliability, cost of ownership and technical service and support. We believe that we are competitive based on the customer selection factors in each market we serve. None of our competitors compete with us across all of our product lines.

        We compete with process equipment manufacturers such as Aixtron, Anelva, Hitachi, Riber,Applied Materials, Centrotherm, Nippon Sanso, Oerlikon and Aixtron. We compete with metrology product manufacturers such as KLA-Tencor, Seiko, Hitachi, Zygo, Agilent, and a variety of small manufacturers.Riber.


Intellectual Property

        Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. Although we attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other measures, there can be no assurance that we will be able to protect our technology adequately or that competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently.

        We have patents and exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to patents owned by others covering certain of our products, which we believe provide us with a competitive advantage. We have a policy of seeking patents on inventions concerning new products and improvements as part of our ongoing research, development and manufacturing activities. We believe that there is no single patent or exclusive or non-exclusive license to patents owned by others whichthat is critical to our operations, and thatas the success of our business depends primarily on the technical expertise, innovation, customer satisfaction and experience of our employees.

        We also rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and propriety information. There can be no assurance that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. In addition, we cannot be certain that we will not be sued by third parties alleging that we have infringed their patents or other intellectual property rights. If any third party sues us, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. We have brought a patent infringement lawsuit against Asylum Research. See "Legal Proceedings—Non-Environmental."

Employees

        AtAs of December 31, 2007,2010, we had 1,216900 employees, of which there were 325192 in manufacturing and testing, 180109 in sales and marketing, 165153 in service, 6233 in product support, 328274 in engineering, research and development and 156139 in information technology, general administration and finance. In addition,



we also had 123 temporary employees, which support our variable cost strategy. The success of our future operations depends in large part on our ability to recruit and retain engineers, technicians and other highly-skilled professionals who are in considerable demand. We feel that we have adequate programs in place to attract, motivate and retain our employees, and weemployees. We plan to monitor industry practices to make sure that our compensation and employee benefits remain competitive. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining key personnel. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

Available Information

        We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site ishttp://www.sec.gov.

Internet Address

        We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our website iswww.veeco.com. We provide a link on our website, under Investors—Financial Info—Financial—SEC Filings, through which investors can access our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports. These filings are posted to our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC.



Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Risk Factors That May Impact Future Results

        In addition to the other information set forth herein, the following risk factors should be carefully considered by shareholders of and potential investors in the Company.

The cyclicalityOur failure to successfully manage our outsourcing activities or failure of our outsourcing partners to perform as anticipated could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to realize the benefits of the industriesincreased MOCVD order volume.

        To better align our costs with market conditions, increase the percentage of variable costs relative to total costs and to increase productivity and operational efficiency, we serve directly affectshave outsourced certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our business.new MOCVD systems, data storage systems, solar deposition systems and ion sources. In addition, to supplement our current staffing and our planned hiring to meet the increased MOCVD order volume, we rely heavily on our outsourcing partners and utilize technical staffing firms and contractors to assist with certain aspects of MOCVD system installation at customer sites. In order to meet the substantial increase in MOCVD system orders, we are relying heavily on our outsourcing partners. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing may adversely affect our ability to satisfy the recent strong demand for our MOCVD equipment and to bring other new products to market. If our outsourcing partners do not perform successfully, our results of operations may be adversely affected and we could suffer damage to our reputation. Although we attempt to select reputable providers, it is possible that one or more of these providers could fail to perform as we expect. In addition, the expanded role of third party providers has required and will continue to require us to implement changes to our existing operations and adopt new procedures and processes for retaining and managing these providers in order to realize operational efficiencies, assure quality, and protect our intellectual property. If we do not effectively manage our outsourcing strategy or if third party providers do not perform as anticipated, we may not



realize the benefits of the increase in MOCVD order volume or gross margin or productivity improvements and we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs, manufacturing and/or installation interruptions or delays, inefficiencies in the structure and/or operation of our supply chain, loss of intellectual property rights, quality issues, increased product time-to-market and/or inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The reduction or elimination of foreign government subsidies and economic incentives may adversely affect the future order rate for our MOCVD equipment.

        The Chinese government has provided various incentives to encourage development of the LED industry, including subsidizing a significant portion of the purchase cost of MOCVD equipment. These subsidies have enabled and encouraged certain customers in this region to purchase more of our MOCVD equipment than these customers might have purchased without these subsidies. These subsidies are expected to decline over time and may end or be reduced at some point in the future. The reduction or elimination of these incentives may result in a reduction in future orders for our MOCVD equipment in this region which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        A related risk is that many customers are using the Chinese government subsidies, in addition to other incentives from the Chinese government, to build new manufacturing facilities or to expand existing manufacturing facilities. Delays in the start-up of these facilities, and other related issues pertaining to customer readiness, could adversely impact the timing of our revenue recognition and have other negative effects on our financial condition and operating results.

Manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect our ability to meet customer demand, while the failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        Our business depends in large part uponon our ability to supply equipment, services and related products that meet the capital expenditures of manufacturers in the data storage, HB-LED/wireless,rapidly changing technical and semiconductor markets, as well as customers in the scientific research and industrial market. These markets accounted for the following percentagesvolume requirements of our net sales for the periods indicated:

 
 Year ended December 31,
 
 
 2007
 2006
 2005
 
Data Storage 34%42%41%
HB-LED/wireless 28%20%15%
Scientific Research and Industrial 29%25%27%
Semiconductor 9%13%17%

        Veeco is subject to the business cycles of these industries, the timing, length, and volatility ofcustomers, which are difficult to predict. These industries have historically been highly cyclical and have experienced significant economic downturnsdepends in the last decade. As a capital equipment provider, our revenues depend in large part on the spending patternstimely delivery of these customers, who often delay expenditures parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from suppliers. Some key parts may be subject to long lead-times and/or cancelobtainable only from a single supplier or reschedule orderslimited group of suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by suppliers located in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. In downturns, we must be able to quickly and effectively align our costs with prevailing market conditions, as well as motivate and retain key employees. However, because a high proportioncountries other than the United States. We may experience significant interruptions of our costs are fixed,manufacturing operations, delays in our ability to reduce expenses quicklydeliver products or services, increased costs or customer order cancellations as a result of:

        In addition, our need to revenue shortfallsrapidly increase our business and manufacturing capacity to meet unanticipated increases in demand may be limited by working capital constraints of our suppliers and may exacerbate any interruptions in our manufacturing operations and supply chain and the associated effect on our working capital. Moreover, if actual demand for our products is limited. A downturndifferent than expected,



we may purchase more/fewer parts than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing or expediting delivery of parts. The volatility of demand for capital equipment increases capital, technical and other risks for companies in the supply chain. Any or all of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers, some of whom are our sole source for particular components.

        We currently outsource certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, data storage systems, solar deposition systems and ion sources. We primarily rely on several suppliers for the manufacturing of these systems. We plan to maintain internal manufacturing capability for these systems at least until such time as we have qualified one or more alternate suppliers to perform this manufacturing. The failure of our present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under our supply arrangements and our inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these industriessystems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with our customers.

        In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellation could result in decreased sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        Customer purchase orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, generally with limited or no penalties. Often, we have incurred expenses prior to such cancellation without adequate monetary compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $10.7 million, consisting of $12.5 million for order adjustments ($10.2 million is related to our Solar and MBE businesses), offset by $1.8 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation. With our current high backlog, a downturn in one or more of our served markets could result in a significant increase in cancellations and/or rescheduling.

        We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and future usage trends and other factors including the consideration of the amount of backlog we have on hand at any particular point in time. If our backlog is canceled or modified, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. In addition, we place orders with our suppliers based on our customers' orders to us. If our customers cancel their orders with us, we may not be able to cancel our orders with our suppliers and may be required to take a charge for these cancelled commitments to our suppliers. Any such charges could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Our sales to HB LED and data storage manufacturers are highly dependent on these manufacturers' sales for consumer electronics applications, which can experience significant volatility due to seasonal and other factors, which could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

        The demand for HB LEDs and hard disk drives is highly dependent on sales of consumer electronics, such as flat-panel televisions and computer monitors, computers, digital video recorders, camcorders, MP3/4 players and cell phones. Our sales to HB LED manufacturers are also highly dependent on end market adoption of LED technology into general illumination applications, including



residential, commercial and street lighting markets. Manufacturers of HB LEDs and hard disk drives are among our largest customers and have accounted for a substantial portion of our revenues for the past several years. Factors that could influence the levels of spending on consumer electronic products include consumer confidence, access to credit, volatility in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and healthcare costs and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our customers' products and, in turn, on our customers' demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if manufacturers of HB LEDs have overestimated their potential market share growth, we may experience cancellations of orders in backlog, postponement of customer deliveries, obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        In addition, the demand for some of our customers' products can be even more volatile and unpredictable due to the possibility of competing technologies, such as flash memory as an alternative to hard disk drives. Should flash memory become cost competitive it may result in a rapid shift in demand from the hard disk drives made by our customers to alternative storage technologies. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand for our customers' products or rapid shifts in demand from our customers' products to alternative technologies could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

Negative worldwide economic conditions could result in a decrease in our net sales and an increase in our operating costs, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

        As a global company with worldwide operations, we are subject to volatility and adverse consequences associated with worldwide economic downturns. In the event of a worldwide downturn, many of our customers may delay or further reduce their purchases of our products and services. If negative conditions in the global credit markets prevent our customers' access to credit, product orders in these channels may decrease which could result in lower revenue. Likewise, if our suppliers face challenges in obtaining credit, in selling their products or otherwise in operating their businesses, they may become unable to continue to offer the materials we use to manufacture our products. Our results of operations would be further adversely affected if we were to experience lower than anticipated order levels, cancellations of orders in backlog, postponement of customer deliveries, or pricing pressure as a result of a prolonged slowdown.

        In addition, negative worldwide economic conditions and market instability make it increasingly difficult for us, our customers and our suppliers to accurately forecast future product demand, which could result in obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        Furthermore, we finance a portion of our sales through trade credit. In addition to ongoing credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition, we seek to mitigate our credit risk by obtaining deposits and/or letters of credit on certain of our sales arrangements. We could suffer significant losses if a customer whose accounts receivable we have not secured fails or is otherwise unable to pay us. A significant loss in collections on our accounts receivable would have a negative impact on our financial results.

We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business, including the need to obtain export licenses for certain of our shipments and political risks in the countries we operate.

        Approximately 90% of our 2010 net sales, 79% of our 2009 net sales and 58% of our 2008 net sales were generated from sales outside of the United States. We expect sales from non-U.S. markets to continue to represent a significant, and possibly increasing, portion of our sales in the future. Our



non-U.S. sales and operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, many of which are outside our control, including:

        Many of these challenges are present in China, which accounted for approximately 30% of our total 2010 revenues. These conditions in China and other foreign economies may continue and recur again in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, political instability, terrorism, acts of war or epidemics in regions where we operate may adversely affect or disrupt our business and results of operations.

        Furthermore, products which are either manufactured in the United States or based on U.S. technology are subject to the United States Export Administration Regulations ("EAR") when exported to and re-exported from international jurisdictions, in addition to the local jurisdiction's export regulations applicable to individual shipments. Currently, our MOCVD deposition systems and certain of our other products are controlled for export under the EAR. Licenses or proper license exceptions may be required for the shipment of our products to certain countries. For example, shipment of our MOCVD systems to China and certain other countries generally requires a U.S. export license. Obtaining an export license requires cooperation from the customer and customer-facility readiness, and can add time to the order fulfillment process. While we have generally been very successful in obtaining export licenses in a timely manner, there can be no assurance that this will continue or that an export license can be obtained in each instance where it is required. If an export license is required but cannot be obtained, then we will not be permitted to export the product to the customer. The administrative processing, potential delay and risk of ultimately not obtaining an export license pose a particular disadvantage to us relative to our non-U.S. competitors who are not required to comply with U.S. export controls. Non-compliance with the EAR or other applicable export regulations could result in a wide range of penalties including the denial of export privileges, fines, criminal penalties, and the seizure of commodities. In the event that any export regulatory body determines that any of our shipments violate applicable export regulations, we could be fined significant sums and/or our export capabilities could be restricted, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.



We are exposed to risks associated with our entrance into the emerging solar industry.

        An increasing strategic focus for Veeco is to supply equipment to the solar industry. In addition to the other risk factors described herein, the solar industry is characterized by other specific risks, including:

        If we do not successfully manage the risks resulting from these and other changes occurring in the solar industry, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

        In addition, solar is a relatively new market for us and poses the following additional challenges:

        If we do not successfully manage the risks resulting from its entry into the solar market, our business, financial condition and attract, hire, assimilate,results of operations could be materially and retainadversely affected.

The timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

        We derive a sufficientsubstantial portion of our net sales in any fiscal period from the sale of a relatively small number of qualified people. We cannot give assurances thathigh-priced systems. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue for a single transaction could have a material effect on our net sales and operating results willfor a particular fiscal period. As is typical in our industry, orders, shipments, and customer acceptances often occur during the last few weeks of a quarter. As a result, delay of only a week or two can often shift the related booking or sale into the next quarter, which could adversely affect our reported results for the prior quarter. Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend to continue. If our orders, shipments, net sales or operating results in a particular quarter do not meet expectations, our stock price may be adversely affected if our customers experience economic downturns or slowdowns in their businesses.affected.


We operate in industries characterized by rapid technological change.

        The data storage, HB-LED/wireless, semiconductor, and scientific research and industrial industriesAll of our businesses are subject to rapid technological change. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to enhance existing products and develop and manufacture new products in a timely and cost effective manner and to accurately predict technology transitions. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, we must anticipate the future demand for products in selecting which development programs to fund and pursue. Our financial results for 20082011 and in the future will depend to a great extent on the successful introduction of several new products, many of which require achieving increasingly stringent technical specifications. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or new technologies or in enhancing existing products.

We face significant competition.

        We face significant competition throughout the world in each of our reportable segments. Manysegments, which may increase as certain markets in which we operate continue to expand. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, and marketing resources than us. In addition, we face competition from smaller emerging equipment companies whose strategy is to provide



a portion of the products and services we offer, using innovative technology to sell products into specialized markets. New product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified price competition resulting in lower margins. Our failure to compete successfully with these other companies would seriously harm our business.

We depend on a limited number of customers that operate in highly concentrated industries.

        Our customer base is and has been highly concentrated. Orders from a relatively limited number of customers have accounted for, and likely will continue to account for, a substantial portion of our net sales, which may lead customers to demand pricing and other terms less favorable to us. Based on net sales, Seagate Technology, Inc. is our five largest customer, accountingcustomers accounted for 10%52%, 18%,52% and 15%43% of our total net sales in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. Our next largest customer is Hitachi Ltd., accounting for 7%, 10%, and 9% of our total net sales in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively (our only customers with sales greater than 10% in any of the past three years).

        If a principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic setbacks, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to increase sales in the future will depend in part upon our ability to obtain orders from new customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to do so. In addition, because a relatively small number of large manufacturers, many of whom are our customers, dominate the industries in which they operate, it may be especially difficult for us to replace these customers if we lose their business. A substantial portion of orders in our backlog are orders from our principal customers.

        In addition, a substantial investment is required by customers to install and integrate capital equipment into a production line. As a result, once a manufacturer has selected a particular vendor's capital equipment, we believe that the manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for the specific production line application and frequently will attempt to consolidate its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, if a customer selects a competitor's product over ours for technical superiority or other reasons, we could experience difficulty selling to that customer for a significant period of time.

        Furthermore, we do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, our agreements with our customers do not provide any assurance of future sales and we are exposed to competitive price pressure on each new order we attempt to obtain. Our failure to obtain new sales orders from new or existing customers would have a negative impact on our results of operations.



The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business.

        Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers in the HB LED, solar and data storage markets. We are subject to the business cycles of these industries, the timing, length, and volatility of which are difficult to predict. These industries have historically been highly cyclical and have experienced significant economic downturns in the last decade. As a capital equipment provider, our revenues depend in large part on the spending patterns of these customers, who often delay expenditures or cancel or reschedule orders in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. In downturns, we must be able to quickly and effectively align our costs with prevailing market conditions, as well as motivate and retain key employees. However, because a proportion of our orders, shipments, andcosts are fixed, our ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to revenue recognitionshortfalls may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

        We derive a substantial portionbe limited. A downturn in one or more of our net sales in any fiscal period from the sale of a relatively small number of high-priced systems. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue for a single transactionthese industries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. During periods of rapid growth, we must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand, and attract, hire, assimilate and retain a sufficient number of qualified people. We cannot give assurances that our net sales and operating results for a particular fiscal period. As is typical in our industry, orders, shipments, and customer acceptances often occur during the last few weeks of a quarter. As a result, delay of only a week or two can often shift the related booking or net sales into the next quarter, which could adversely affect our reported results for the prior quarter. Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend to continue. If our orders, shipments, net sales or operating results in a particular quarter dowill not meet expectations, our stock price may be adversely affected.

Changesaffected if our customers experience economic downturns or slowdowns in our product mix may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

        Certain of our products have historically had lower gross margins than other products. We expect this trend to continue. If a greater portion of our overall business in the future comes from products



operating at lower gross margins, then our overall gross margins will decline. This could have an adverse effect on our stock price.

Our customers may cancel or reschedule their orders with us.

        Customer purchase orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, generally with limited or no penalties. Often, we have incurred expenses prior to such cancellation without adequate monetary compensation. Backlog adjustments during the year ended December 31, 2007, which were driven by order cancellations, were $16.4 million.businesses.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable.

        Historically, we have experienced long and unpredictable sales cycles (the period between our initial contact with a potential customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer). Our sales cycle can range up to twelve months.months or longer. The timing of an order often depends on the capital expenditure budget cycle of our customers, which is completely out of our control. In addition, the time it takes us to build a product to customer specifications (the "build cycle") typically ranges from one to six months or longer, followed in certain cases by a period of customer acceptance during which the customer evaluates the performance of the system and may potentially reject the system. As a result of the build cycle and evaluation periods, the period between a customer's initial purchase decision and revenue recognition on an order often varies widely, and variations in length of this period can cause further fluctuations in our operating results. As a result of our lengthy sales cycle, we may incur significant research and development expenses and selling and general and administrative expenses before we generate the related revenues for these products. We may never generate the anticipated revenues if a customer cancels or changes plans. Variations in the length of our sales cycle could also cause our net sales and, therefore, our cash flow and net income to fluctuate widely from period to period.

Our outsourcing strategy could adversely affect our results of operations.

        To better align our costs with market conditions and to increase productivity and operational efficiency, we have outsourced, and plan to increase the outsourcing of, certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of the new MOCVD systems and ion beam systems recently introduced by our Process Equipment group. We expect to increase our outsourced manufacturing as we introduce new products in these areas. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing may adversely affect our ability to bring products to market and damage our reputation. Although we attempt to select reputable providers, it is possible that one or more of these providers could fail to perform as we expect. In addition, the expanded role of third party providers has required and will continue to require us to implement changes to our existing operations and adopt new procedures and processes for retaining and managing these providers in order to realize operational efficiencies, assure quality, and protect our intellectual property. If we do not timely and effectively develop and implement our outsourcing strategy or if third party providers do not perform as anticipated, we may not realize gross margin or productivity improvements and we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs, or even manufacturing delays, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers.

        Failure of the suppliers of critical parts, components, and manufacturing equipment to deliver sufficient quantities in a timely and cost-effective manner could adversely affect our business. We generally do not have guaranteed supply or pricing arrangements with our suppliers. As a result, we risk increased cost of materials and difficulty in procuring the parts we need to fill customer orders. We currently use numerous suppliers; however, some key parts may be obtained only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Failure of any of these suppliers to perform in a timely or quality manner could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations. At present, we rely primarily



on a single supplier for the majority of the manufacturing of certain MOCVD and ion beam systems. The failure of this supplier to fulfill its contractual obligations under our supply arrangement and our inability to make alternate arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with our customers.

Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        Our success depends upon our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees, including those in executive, managerial, engineering and marketing and other roles. Our growth is dependent on our ability to attract, retain, and motivatepositions, as well as highly skilled and qualified technical personnel in additionand personnel to personnel that can implement and monitor our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems. Attracting, retaining, and motivating such qualified personnel may be difficult due to challenging industry conditions, competition for such personnel by other technology companies, consolidations and relocations of operations and workforce reductions. OurWhile we have entered into Employment Agreements with certain key personnel, our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

We are exposedThe price of our common shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.

        The stock market in general and the market for technology stocks in particular, has experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the risksoperating performance of operating a global business.

        Approximately 68%companies. If these market or industry-based fluctuations continue, the trading price of our 2007 net sales and 67%common shares could decline significantly



independent of our 2006 net sales were generated from sales outside the United States. We expect sales from non-U.S. markets to continue to representactual operating performance, and shareholders could lose all or a significant, and possibly increasing, portionsubstantial part of their investment. The market price of our salescommon shares could fluctuate significantly in response to several factors, including among others:

        Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred with respect to the publicly traded securities of the Company and technology companies generally. The price of our common shares is likely to be volatile in the future. Our non-U.S. sales and operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, manyIn the past, securities class action litigation often has been brought against a company following periods of which are outside our control, including:

        Many of these challenges are present in China, a large potential market for our products and an area that we anticipate will present a significant opportunity for growth. These conditions in China and other foreign economies may continue and recur againvolatility in the future,market price of its securities. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, political instability, terrorism, acts of war or epidemics in regions where we operate maymaterially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.


operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks.

        We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that are inherent in our anticipated sales, sales commitments and assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Although we attempt to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, these hedging activities may not always be available or adequate to eliminate, or even mitigate, the impact of our exchange rate exposure. Failure to sufficiently hedge or otherwise manage foreign currency risks properly could materially and adversely affect our revenues and gross margins.

Our success depends onThe enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights.rights may be expensive and could divert our limited resources.

        Our success depends in part upon the protection of our intellectual property rights. We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary information, technologies and processes. We own various United States and international patents and have additional pending patent applications relating to certain of our products and technologies. The process of seeking patent protection is lengthy and expensive, and we cannot be certain that pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents or that issued patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage. In addition, our intellectual property rights may be circumvented, invalidated or rendered obsolete by the rapid pace of technological change. Policing unauthorized use of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. Furthermore, the laws of other countries may less effectively protect our proprietary rights than U.S. laws. Our outsourcing strategy requires that we share certain portions of our technology with our outsourcing partners, which poses additional risks of infringement and trade secret misappropriation. Infringement of our rights by a third party could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue opportunities.

        On September 17, 2003, We cannot be certain that the steps we filed a lawsuithave taken will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary intellectual property rights as fully or as readily as United States laws.



Further, we cannot be certain that the laws and policies of any country, including the United States, District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Inc. ("Asylum"), a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees. The lawsuit alleges that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum's MFP-3D AFM constitutes willful infringement of five patents owned by us, as well as other claims. We are suing for unspecified monetary damages and a permanent injunction to stop infringement. Asylum has asserted that the patents we are suing on are invalid and unenforceable, and has filed a counterclaim for infringement of a patent licensed by Asylum, and payment of royalties it believes it is owed. The court held hearings on the summary judgment motions and referred many of the issues to a Special Master. On March 17, 2007, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the cross motions for summary judgment. The court granted Asylum summary judgment for two of the five patents, determining that Asylum did not infringe on Veeco's patents 5,266,801 ("801") and 5,415,027 ("027"). The court did not grant summary judgment to Veeco or Asylum for the other three patents, 5,224,376 ("376"), 5,237,859 ("859") and RE36,488 ("488"), and the lawsuit has proceeded with respect to those three patents. The costs of continuing to pursue this matter are significant and there canintellectual property enforcement or licensing will not be no assurance that we will be successfulchanged in this matter. Our policy is to capitalize legal costs incurred to defend our patents. We are currently amortizing the portion of these deferred legal costs associated with patents 801 and 027 over the remaining life of these patents, as these patents are valid and enforceable. All legal costs incurred subsequenta way detrimental to the summary judgmentsale or use of our products or technology.

        We may need to defendlitigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the remainingvalidity and scope of proprietary rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our ability to enforce one or more patents have been allocated ratablyor incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Any action we take to the three patents stillenforce our intellectual property rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and attention, which, in suit and have been capitalized. If we are not successful in defending the patents, these costs may be requiredturn, could negatively impact our operating results. In addition, failure to be written down under U.S. generally accepted accounting policies.protect our trademark rights could impair our brand identity.

We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others.

        From time to time we have received communications from other parties asserting the existence of patent or other rights which they believe cover certain of our products. We also periodically receive notice from customers who believe that we are required to indemnify them for damages they may incur related to infringement claims made against these customers by third parties. Our customary practice is to evaluate such assertions and to consider the available alternatives, including whether to seek a license, if appropriate. However, we cannot ensure that licenses can be obtained or, if obtained, will be on acceptable terms or that costly litigation or other administrative proceedings will not occur. If we are not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement of the matter, obtain necessary licenses on



commercially reasonable terms, and/or successfully prosecute or defend our position, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.

        We have considered numerous acquisition opportunities and completed several significant acquisitions in the past. We may consider acquisitions of, or investments in, other businesses in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, many of which are unpredictable and beyond our control, including:

        Our inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

        In addition, if we issue equity securities to pay for an acquisition, the ownership percentage of our then-existing shareholders would be reduced and the value of the shares held by these shareholders could be diluted, which could adversely affect the price of our stock and convertible subordinated



notes. If we use cash to pay for an acquisition, the payment could significantly reduce the cash that would be available to fund our operations or other purposes, including making payments on the convertible subordinated notes. There can be no assurance that financing for future acquisitions will be available on favorable terms or at all.

The implementationWe may be required to take additional impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets or definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets.

        We are required to assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment, or on an interim basis whenever certain events occur or circumstances change, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a new information technology system may disruptreporting unit below its carrying amount. We are also required to test our operations.definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets, including acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, for recoverability and impairment whenever there are indicators of impairment, such as an adverse change in business climate.

        Our ability to design, manufacture, market,At December 31, 2010, we had $52.0 million of goodwill and service our products is dependent on information technology systems that encompass all$59.2 million of intangible and long-lived assets, including $42.3 million of property, plant and equipment. As part of our majorlong-term strategy, we may pursue future acquisitions of other companies or assets which could potentially increase our goodwill and intangible and long-lived assets. Adverse changes in business functions. We are in the final stagesconditions could materially impact our estimates of implementing a comprehensive enterprise resource planning ("ERP") software system. This new ERP system will cover many areas of our business. System failure or malfunctioning mayfuture operations and result in disruptionadditional impairment charges to these assets. If our goodwill or intangible and long-lived assets were to become further impaired, our results of operations and the inability to process transactions and could adversely affect our financial results. If we encounter unforeseen delays or difficulties or significant increased costs in implementing our system, we could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not obtain sufficient affordable funds to financereceive the escrowed proceeds from the sale of our future needs.Metrology business.

        We may need to make significant capital expenditures to continue our operations and to enhance our manufacturing capability to keep paceIn connection with rapidly changing technologies. Also, our industry is characterized by the need for continued investment in research and development. If we fail to invest sufficiently in research and development, our products could become less attractive to potential customers. As a resultsale of our emphasisMetrology business to Bruker Corporation ("Bruker") on researchOctober 7, 2010, we agreed to indemnify Bruker, subject to certain limitations, for certain losses arising out of breaches of the representations, warranties and development and technological innovation, our



operating costs may increasecovenants that we made in the future. Our original 4.125% convertible subordinated notes matureStock Purchase Agreement and in December 2008. During the first quarter of 2007,certain related documents. To secure these indemnification obligations, we repurchased $56.0 million of these notes, and on April 20, 2007, we negotiated an exchange agreement with certain holders of these notesagreed to exchange $118.8deposit into escrow $22.9 million of the original notesconsideration paid to us by Bruker, such funds to remain in escrow for $117.8 milliontwelve months following the closing. In the event of new convertible subordinated notes. The new convertible subordinated notes do not mature until 2012; however, as of February 25, 2008, we had $25.2 millionany qualifying indemnification claims, and after following the procedures set forth in the escrow agreement, all or a portion of the original notes outstanding, which are due in December 2008. If cash flow from our operations is not sufficientescrowed amount may be released and returned to repay these notes, we may haveBruker to borrow funds to do so. During the past few years, the markets for equity and debt securities have fluctuated significantly, especially with respect to technology-related companies, and during some periods offerings of those securities have been extremely difficult to complete. As asatisfy such claims. This would result in a reduction in the future we may not be able to obtainpurchase price received for the additional funds required to fundsale of our operations, invest sufficientlyMetrology business, which could result in research and development, and repay or refinance our convertible subordinated notes on reasonable terms, or at all. Such a lack of funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,condition.

Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our financial results.

        Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and operating results.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Application of Critical Accounting Policies" below. New accounting pronouncements or taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements or taxation practices have occurred and may occur in the future. New rules, changes to existing rules, if any, or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or change the way we conduct our business.

We are subject to internal control evaluations and attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

        Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we must include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K a report of management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ongoing compliance with this requirement is complex, costly and time-consuming. Although our assessment, testing, and evaluation resulted in our conclusion that, as of December 31, 2010, our



internal controls over financial reporting were effective, we cannot predict the outcome of our testing in future periods. If our internal controls are ineffective in future periods, or if our management does not timely assess the adequacy of such internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions, the public's perception of our Company may decline and our financial results or the market price of our shares could be adversely affected.

We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations.

        We are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations in connection with our business operations, including but not limited to regulations related to the development, manufacture, and use of our products. Failure or inability to comply with existing or future environmental and safety regulations could result in significant remediation liabilities, the imposition of fines and/or the suspension or termination of development, manufacture, or use of certain of our products, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have significant operations in locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a natural disaster or other significant disruption.

        Our operations in the U.S., the Asia-Pacific region and in other areas could be subject to natural disasters or other significant disruptions, including earthquakes, fires, hurricanes, floods, water shortages, other extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, acts of terrorism, power shortages and blackouts, telecommunications failures, and other natural and manmade disasters or disruptions. In the event of such a natural disaster or other disruption, we could experience disruptions or interruptions to our operations or the operations of our suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers; destruction of facilities; and/or loss of life, all of which could materially increase our costs and expenses and materially and adversely affect our business, revenue and financial condition.

We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our companyCompany by another company more difficult.

        We have adopted, and may in the future adopt, certain measures that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a takeover or other change in control of Veecoour Company that a holder of our common stock might not consider in its best interest. These measures include:

        Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 500,000 shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights (including voting rights), preferences and privileges of these shares ("blank check" preferred). Such preferred stock may have rights, including economic rights, senior to our common stock. As a result, the issuance of the preferred stock could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock and could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding common stock.

        Our board of directors is divided into three classes with each class serving a staggered three-year term. The existence of a classified board will make it more difficult for our shareholders to change the composition (and therefore the policies) of our board of directors in a relatively short period of time.

        We have adopted a shareholder rights plan, under which we have granted to our shareholders rights to purchase shares of junior participating preferred stock. This plan or "poison pill" could discourage a takeover that is not approved by our board of directors but which a shareholder might consider in its best interest, thereby adversely affecting our stock price.


        We have adopted certain certificate of incorporation and bylaws provisions which may have anti-takeover effects. These include: (a) requiring certain actions to be taken at a meeting of shareholders rather than by written consent, (b) requiring a super-majority of shareholders to call a special meeting of shareholders or to approve certain amendments to our bylaws, (c) limiting the maximum number of directors, and (d) providing that directors may be removed only for "cause." These measures and those described above may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a takeover or other change in control of Veeco that a holder of our common stock might consider in its best interest.

        In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination, including mergers and asset sales, with an interested stockholder (generally, a 15% or greater stockholder) for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The operation of Section 203 may have anti-takeover effects, which could delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt that a holder of our common stock might consider in its best interest.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

Item 2.    Properties

        Our corporate headquarters office and our principal product development and marketing, manufacturing, research and development, training, and sales and service facilities, as well as the approximate size and the segments which utilize such facilities, are:

Owned Facilities Location

 Approximate Size (sq.
(sq. ft.)

 Mortgaged
 Use

Plainview, NY

 80,000 No Process EquipmentData Storage and LED & Solar and Corporate Headquarters
Santa Barbara, CA

Somerset, NJ

 100,000NoMetrology
Somerset, NJ 80,000 No Process EquipmentLED & Solar

St. Paul, MN(1)

 125,000 Yes Process EquipmentLED & Solar

Tucson, AZ(2)

 110,000 No Former Metrology Site
Leased Facilities Location

 Approximate Size (sq. ft.)
 Lease Expires
 Use
Camarillo, CA 48,000 2009 Process Equipment
Camarillo, CA 26,000 2012 Process Equipment
Camarillo, CA 19,000 2010 Metrology
Fort Collins, CO(3) 42,000 2009 Process Equipment
Fremont, CA(4) 14,000 2010 Process Equipment
Santa Barbara, CA 24,000 2009 Metrology
Ventura, CA(5) 125,000 2009 Held for sublease
Woodbury, NY(6) 32,000 2011 Headquarters


Leased Facilities Location
 Approximate Size
(sq. ft.)
 Lease Expires Use

Camarillo, CA(3)

  26,000  2012 Data Storage and partially held for sublease

Fort Collins, CO

  26,000  2011 Data Storage

Clifton Park, NY

  18,000  2014 LED & Solar

Clifton Park, NY

  8,000  2011 LED & Solar

Lowell, MA

  28,000  2012 LED & Solar

Somerset, NJ

  14,500  2011 LED & Solar

Somerset, NJ

  9,500  2012 LED & Solar

Shanghai, China

  17,400  2012 Customer Training Center

Woodbury, NY(4)

  32,000  2011 Former Corporate Headquarters

(1)
Our Process Equipment businessLED & Solar segment utilizes approximately 95,000 square feet of this facility. The balance is available for expansion.

(2)
OurWe vacated this facility during the fourth quarter of 2010 in conjunction with the sale of our Metrology business utilizes approximately 75,000 square feet ofsegment to Bruker. We are currently leasing this facility. The balance is available for expansion.

(3)
During 2007, the leaseoffice to Bruker in accordance with a transition services agreement which will expire on a 13,000 square foot section of this property expired and we renewed a lease for 8,000 square feet of this section. The lease on the total balance of the 42,000 square feet expires in 2009.October 6, 2011.

(4)(3)
Beginning on April 1, 2008,We vacated this facility will be used as a sales and service center.

(5)
This facility is leased fromduring the former ownersecond quarter of Manufacturing Technology, Inc. ("MTI").2009 in conjunction with the outsourcing of manufacturing for certain Data Storage product lines. We have subleasedreoccupied a portion of this buildingspace and are marketing the remaining portion of this facilityspace for sublease.

(6)(4)
As part of management's cost reduction initiatives, we plan to consolidateWe vacated our headquarters into our Plainview, NY manufacturing facility. We plan to vacate theformer Woodbury headquarters during the first quarter of 2008 and sublease this office space.consolidated our operations into our Plainview manufacturing facility.

        The St. Paul, Minnesota facility is subject to a mortgage, which at December 31, 2007,2010, had an outstanding balance of $3.5$2.9 million. Our Santa Barbara, California facility was previously subject to a mortgage, which was satisfied during 2007 through a balloon payment of $5.2 million which was made on December 1, 2007. We also lease small offices in Chadds Ford, PennsylvaniaSanta Clara, California, Chelmsford, Massachusetts and Edina, Minnesota for sales and service. Our foreign subsidiaries lease office space for use as sales and service centers in England, France, Germany, Netherlands, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, China and Taiwan. We believe our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

Environmental

        We may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay up to $250,000 in connection with the implementation of a comprehensive plan of environmental remediation at our Plainview, New York facility. We have been indemnified by the former owner for any liabilities we may incur in excess of $250,000 with respect to any such remediation. No comprehensive plan has been required to date. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any remediation plan that may be proposed.

        We are aware that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been detected in the soil at the site of a facility formerly leased by us in Santa Barbara, California. We have been indemnified for any liabilities we may incur which arise from environmental contamination at the site. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any such liabilities.

        The former owner of the land and building in which our Santa Barbara, California in which our former Metrology operations arewere located (which business was sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010), has disclosed that there are hazardous substances present in the ground under the building. Management believes that the comprehensive indemnification clause that iswas part of the purchase contract relating to the purchase of such land provides adequate protection against any environmental issues that may arise. We have provided Bruker with similar indemnification as part of the sale.

Non-Environmental

        On September 17, 2003, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Inc., a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees. The lawsuit alleges that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum's MFP-3D AFM constitutes willful infringement of five patents owned by us, as well as other claims. We are suing for unspecified monetary damages and a permanent injunction to stop infringement. Asylum has asserted that the patents we are suing on are invalid and unenforceable, and has filed a counterclaim for infringement of a patent licensed by Asylum, and payment of royalties it believes it is owed. The court held hearings on the summary judgment motions and referred many of the issues to a Special Master. On March 17, 2007 the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the cross motions for summary judgment. The court granted Asylum summary judgment for two of the five patents, determining that Asylum did not infringe on Veeco's patents 5,266,801 ("801") and 5,415,027 ("027"). The court did not grant summary judgment to Veeco or Asylum for the other three patents, 5,224,376



("376"), 5,237,859 ("859") and RE36,488 ("488"), and the lawsuit has proceeded with respect to those three patents. The costs of continuing to pursue this matter are significant and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this matter. Our policy is to capitalize legal costs incurred to defend our patents. We are currently amortizing the portion of these deferred legal costs associated with patents 801 and 027 over the remaining life of these patents, as these patents are valid and enforceable. All legal costs incurred subsequent to the summary judgment to defend the remaining patents have been allocated ratably to the three patents still in suit and have been capitalized. If we are not successful in defending the patents, these costs may need to be written down.

        Veeco and certain of its officers were named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit consolidated in August 2005 in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit arose out of the restatement in March 2005 of our financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as a result of our discovery of certain improper accounting transactions at our TurboDisc business unit. On July 5, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve this lawsuit for a payment of $5.5 million. This settlement was approved by the court on November 7, 2007. Insurance proceeds covered the settlement amount and legal expenses related to the settlement after our payment of the insurance deductible. The settlement dismissed all pending claims against us and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by Veeco or any of the other defendants, and Veeco and the other defendants received a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.

        In addition, three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in March and April of 2005. The plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action asserted that our directors and certain of our officers breached fiduciary duties in connection with the improper accounting transactions at the TurboDisc business unit. On November 5, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve the consolidated shareholder derivative action, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the individual defendants, for a payment of approximately $0.5 million and for our agreement to adopt certain changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. We expect that insurance proceeds will cover the settlement amount and any significant legal expenses related to the settlement. On January 24, 2008, the Court gave preliminary approval of the proposed settlement. The settlement agreement is subject to final court approval and would dismiss all pending claims against us and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by us or any of the other defendants, and Veeco and the other defendants would receive a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.

        We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders(Removed and Reserved).

        None.



PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ National Market under the symbol "VECO." The 20072010 and 20062009 high and low closing bid prices by quarter are as follows:

 
 2007
 2006
 
 High
 Low
 High
 Low
First Quarter $20.87 $18.68 $23.35 $17.83
Second Quarter  20.95  17.05  27.20  21.71
Third Quarter  22.09  15.50  24.67  20.13
Fourth Quarter  20.20  15.82  19.98  18.24

 
 2010 2009 
 
 High Low High Low 

First Quarter

 $43.72 $30.42 $7.16 $3.96 

Second Quarter

  51.61  31.79  12.99  6.19 

Third Quarter

  45.52  31.02  23.49  11.36 

Fourth Quarter

  49.97  33.71  34.35  21.90 

        On February 25, 2008,22, 2011, the closing bid price for our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market was $16.62. As of February 25, 2008,$47.04 and we had approximately 341144 shareholders of record.

        InAs of December 200131, 2010 we had convertible notes of $105.6 million. The notes accrue interest at 4.125% per annum and mature on April 15, 2012. The notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, since we have the ability and the intent to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash. Under the terms of the notes, we may pay the principal amount of converted notes in cash or in shares of common stock. We intend to pay such amounts in cash. Holders may convert the notes at any time during the period beginning on January 2002, we issued $220.0 million15, 2012 through the close of 4.125%business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including our common stock trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days during the final 30 trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, our common stock was trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for the specified period and, as a result, the convertible subordinated notes (the "Old Notes") in a private placement. Duringare convertible during the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of these notes, reducing2011. Accordingly, the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased an additional $56.0 million of these notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holdersbalance of the Old Notes to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the originalconvertible notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of Old Notes remained outstanding. The remaining Old Notes are convertible,at December 31, 2010 has been classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. On February 14, 2011, at the option of the holder, $7.5 million of notes were tendered for conversion at any time on or prior to maturity intoa price of $45.95 per share in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $38.51 per share. We pay interest on these remaining Old Notes on June 21 and December 21 of each year. The Old Notes will mature on December 21, 2008. The New Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007.stock. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2011 we will take a charge for the related unamortized debt discount totaling $0.3 million. We pay interest on these notes on April 2015 and October 15 of each year. The New Notes will mature on April 15, 2012.

        We have not paid dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain future earnings for the development of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate that the Board of Directors will declare or pay any dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, certain provisions of our credit facility limit our ability to pay dividends. The Board of Directors will determine future dividend policy based on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other circumstances.


Stock Performance Graph

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Veeco Instruments Inc., The S&P Smallcap 600 Index,
The PhiladelphiaPHLX Semiconductor Index And A Peer GroupRDG MidCap Technology Index

*
$100 invested on 12/3/0231/05 in stock or index-includingindex, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.

        Copyright© 2011 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.


ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 20022005
ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31

 
 Cumulative Total Return as of December 31,
 
 2002
 2003
 2004
 2005
 2006
 2007
Veeco Instruments Inc.  100.0 243.6 182.27 149.91 162.02 144.46
Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOXX) 100.0 189.77 153.39 175.9 162.04 169.18
Peer Group Index 100.0 174.94 142.93 140.98 183.34 181.18
S&P Smallcap 600 Index 100.0 138.79 170.22 183.3 211.01 210.38

        Information is presented assuming $100 invested on December 31, 2002 and the reinvestment of dividends, if any. The Peer Group Index consists of the following companies: ASM International N.V., Axcelis Technologies Inc., FEI Company, FSI International Inc., Mattson Technology Inc., Rudolph Technologies Inc., Semitool Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Inc. and Zygo Corp.

 
 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

  100.00  108.08  96.36  36.58  190.65  247.89 

S&P Smallcap 600

  100.00  115.12  114.78  79.11  99.34  125.47 

PHLX Semiconductor

  100.00  94.47  102.99  56.15  91.67  103.11 

RDG MidCap Technology

  100.00  111.34  110.83  56.91  90.56  114.02 

Treasury Stock

        The following table contains the Company's stock repurchases of equity securities in the fourth quarter of 2010:

Period
 Total Number of
Shares
Repurchased
 Average Price
Paid Per Share
 Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Program(1)
 Approximate Dollar Value of
Shares that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Program(1)
 

Fiscal month of October 2010 (September 27, 2010—October 24, 2010)(2)

  189,218  34.33  1,118,600  161,901,746 

(1)
On August 24, 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock until August 26, 2011. The program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at the Company's discretion.

(2)
We had no repurchases in the fiscal months of November and December 2010.

Item 6.   Selected Consolidated Financial Data

        The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 
 Years ended December 31,
 
 
 2007(1)
 2006(2)
 2005(3)
 2004(4)
 2003(5)
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                
Net sales $402,475 $441,034 $410,190 $390,443 $279,321 
Operating (loss) income  (12,061) 22,456  11,066  (11,558) (9,325)
Net (loss) income $(17,359)$14,917 $(897)$(62,555)$(9,747)

Net (loss) income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Net (loss) income per common share $(0.56)$0.49 $(0.03)$(2.11)$(0.33)
 Diluted net (loss) income per common share $(0.56)$0.48 $(0.03)$(2.11)$(0.33)
Weighted average shares outstanding  31,020  30,492  29,921  29,650  29,263 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  31,020  31,059  29,921  29,650  29,263 
 
 Years ended December 31,
 
 2007
 2006
 2005
 2004
 2003
 
 (In thousands)

Balance Sheet Data:               
Cash and cash equivalents $117,083 $147,046 $124,499 $100,276 $106,830
Working capital  174,516  248,060  229,650  216,802  257,466
Goodwill  100,898  100,898  99,622  94,645  72,989
Total assets  529,334  589,600  567,860  576,913  596,464
Long-term debt (including current installments)  146,585  209,204  229,580  229,935  230,268
Shareholders' equity  273,677  281,751  248,587  252,352  306,329

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010(1) 2009(2) 2008(3) 2007(4) 2006(5) 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Statement of Operations Data:

                

Net sales

 $933,231 $282,412 $314,935 $252,031 $268,880 

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations

  277,575  (4,732) (46,140) (18,245) (5,767)

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes

  260,531  (14,229) (50,833) (23,655) (4,620)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

  101,229  (1,403) (24,588) 3,817  18,179 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

    (65) (230) (628) (1,358)
            

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $361,760 $(15,567)$(75,191)$(19,210)$14,917 
            

Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

                

Basic:

                
  

Continuing operations

 $6.60 $(0.44)$(1.62)$(0.74)$(0.11)
  

Discontinued operations

  2.56  (0.04) (0.78) 0.12  0.60 
            
 

Income (loss)

 $9.16 $(0.48)$(2.40)$(0.62)$0.49 
            

Diluted :

                
  

Continuing operations

 $6.13 $(0.44)$(1.62)$(0.74)$(0.11)
  

Discontinued operations

  2.38  (0.04) (0.78) 0.12  0.60 
            
 

Income (loss)

 $8.51 $(0.48)$(2.40)$(0.62)$0.49 
            

Weighted average shares outstanding:

��               
  

Basic

  39,499  32,628  31,347  31,020  30,492 
  

Diluted

  42,514  32,628  31,347  31,020  30,492 


 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $245,132 $148,500 $102,521 $116,875 $146,880 

Short-term investments

  394,180  135,000       

Restricted cash

  76,115         

Working capital

  640,139  317,317  168,528  112,089  172,447 

Goodwill

  52,003  52,003  51,741  71,544  71,544 

Total assets

  1,148,034  605,372  429,541  529,334  589,600 

Long-term debt (including current installments)

  104,021  101,176  98,526  132,118  203,774 

Total equity

  762,512  359,059  225,026  288,144  281,751 

(1)
On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology's

    operating results are accounted for as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated results of operations. The sales transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. As part of our agreement with Bruker, $22.9 million of proceeds is held in escrow and is restricted from use for one year from the closing date of the transaction to secure certain specified losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we made in the stock purchase agreement and related documents. As part of the sale we incurred transaction costs, which consisted of investment bank fees and legal fees, totaling $5.2 million. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $156.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain of $5.4 million related to the assets in China.

    In addition, operating income and income from continuing operations includes a restructuring credit of $0.2 million.

(2)
Operating loss and net loss from continuing operations include restructuring expenses of $6.7$4.8 million, as well as an asset impairment charge of $0.3 million for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage segment and a $1.5 million inventory write-off associated with Data Storage legacy products.

(3)
Operating loss and net loss from continuing operations include a $51.4 million asset impairment charge of which $30.4 million was related to goodwill and $21.0 million was related to other long-lived assets, a restructuring charge of $9.4 million consisting of lease-related commitments, the mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with our former CEO and personnel severance costs and $1.5 million in cost of sales related to the required purchase accounting adjustment to write up inventory to fair value in connection with the purchase of Mill Lane Engineering. Net loss from continuing operations also reflects a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $3.8 million.

(4)
Operating loss and net loss from continuing operations include restructuring expenses of $4.8 million, as well as charges of $1.1 million and $4.8 million associated with the write-off of property and equipment and inventory, respectively, related to product lines discontinued as part of management's cost reduction plan. Net incomeloss from continuing operations also reflects a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.7 million and the elimination of 80.1% of the net operating results of Fluens' related to noncontrolling interest.million.

(2)(5)
Operating income and net incomeloss from continuing operations are net of a write-off of $1.2 million of in-process research and development projects related to the Fluens'Fluens acquisition. Net incomeloss from continuing operations also reflects a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3 million and the elimination of 80.1% of the net operating results of Fluens' related to noncontrolling interest.

(3)
Operating income and net loss include restructuring expenses of $1.2 million.

(4)
Operating loss and net loss include (a) restructuring costs of $2.8 million, (b) costs related to the internal investigation of improper accounting transactions at our TurboDisc business unit of $0.8 million, (c) asset impairment charges of $0.8 million related to the consolidation of the Advanced Imaging, Inc. ("Aii") and MTI businesses, and (d) $0.6 million related to the write-off of purchased in-process technology in connection with the MTI acquisition. Net loss also includes a charge of approximately $54.0 million to establish a valuation allowance against substantially all of our domestic net deferred tax assets.

(5)
Operating loss and net loss include merger and restructuring charges of $5.4 million and a write-off of purchased in-process technology of $1.5 million related to the Aii and TurboDisc acquisitions.

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary

        We design,make equipment to develop and manufacture market, and service a broad line of equipment primarily used by manufacturers in the data storage, HB-LED, solar, wireless, and semiconductor industries. These industries help create a wide range of information age products such as computer integrated circuits, personal computers, LEDs for backlighting and automotive applications, HDDs, solar panels, network servers, digital cameras, wireless phones, digital video recorders, personal music/video players, and personal digital assistants. Our broad line of products features leading edge technology and allows customers to improve time-to-market of their next generation products. Our products also enable advancements in the growing fields of nanoscience, nanobiology, and other areas of scientific and industrial research.

        Our Process Equipment products precisely deposit or remove (etch) various thin film materials in the manufacturing of TFMHs for the data storage industry, HB-LEDs, wireless devices (such as power amplifiers and laser diodes)light emitting diodes ("LEDs"), solar panels, hard-disk drives and semiconductor mask reticles. Our Metrology equipment isother devices. We have leading technology positions in our two segments: LED & Solar and Data Storage.

        In our LED & Solar segment, we design and manufacture metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, Copper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide ("CIGS") deposition systems and thermal deposition sources which we sell to manufacturers of high brightness LEDs ("HB LED") and solar panels, as well as to scientific research customers.

        In our Data Storage segment, we design and manufacture ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing systems primarily used to provide critical surface measurements in researchcreate thin film magnetic heads ("TFMHs") that read and production environments. In production, our equipment allows customers, such as those in semiconductor andwrite data storage, to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process in order to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality. We also sell our broad line of AFMs, SPMs, optical interferometers, and stylus profilers to thousands of universities, research facilities, and scientific centers worldwide to enable a variety of nanotechnology related research.on hard disk drives.

        We currently maintain facilities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New York, withsupport our customers through product development, manufacturing, sales and service locations aroundsites in the world. Each of our products is currently manufactured in only one location, since we believe that the technological know-howU.S., Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and precision needed to make each of our products requires specialized expertise.

        During 2007, management initiated and acted on a profit improvement plan, resulting in personnel severance costs for approximately 7.5% of our employees, a reduction of discretionary expenses, realignment of our sales organization to more closely match current market and regional opportunities, and consolidation of certain engineering groups within our data storage business, which included the discontinuation of two products. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, as well as an inventory write-off of $4.8 million and an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million.other locations.

Summary of Results for 20072010

        In 2010, Veeco reported the best year in its history in terms of revenue and profitability. Selected financial highlights include:

    Revenue decreased 8.7%increased 231% to $402.5$933.2 million in 2010 from $282.4 million in 2009. LED & Solar revenues increased 289% to $797.9 million from $441.0$205.2 in 2009. Data Storage revenues increased 75% to $135.3 million from $77.2 million in 2006. We experienced a decline in sales in the data storage and semiconductor markets of 25.3% and 34.8%, respectively; however, this was partially offset by strong growth in the HB-LED/wireless market, representing a 25.2% increase from 2006;2009;

    Our 2007 sales by segmentOrders were $252.0up 108% to $1,121.6 million from Process Equipment and $150.5in 2010 compared to $538.3 million from Metrology, down 6.3% and 12.6%, respectively, from 2006;in 2009;

    2007 sales by region were 33% North America, 19% Europe, 14% Japan, and 34% Asia Pacific;

    Orders were $451.6 million in 2007, down from $493.8 million in 2006;

      Our gross margin declinedincreased to 48% for 2010 from 39% in 2007, mainly due2009. Gross margins in LED & Solar increased to a decrease47% from 40% in sales volume2009, and an unfavorable product mix primarily for products soldData Storage gross margins increased to the data storage markets, as well as a $4.8 million write-off of inventory associated with the discontinuance of certain data storage process equipment products;49% from 37% in 2009.

      Our operating expenses decreased by 1.2% in 2007, driven by decreased selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $91.8 million from $62.2 million in 2009. Selling general and amortization expense, partially offset by current yearadministrative expenses for restructuring chargeswere 10% of $6.7 million and asset impairment chargesnet sales in 2010, compared with 22% of $1.1 million;net sales in 2009;

      Our research and development expenses increased to $71.4 million from $43.5 million in 2009. Research and development expenses were 8% of net sales in 2010, compared with 15% in 2009;

      Net loss for 2007income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Veeco in 2010 was $17.4$260.5 million compared to net income of $14.9($14.2) million in 2006;2009;

      Net lossincome (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Veeco per share was $0.56$6.13 compared to net income per share of $0.48($0.44) in 2006;2009; and

      We usedgenerated net cash of $30.0$96.6 million during 2007,2010, principally due to $45.2 million in connection with the repurchaseproceeds from stock option exercises, $23.3 million of excess tax benefits relating to stock option exercises, and repaymentcash provided by operations of long-term debt of $60.7 million and capital expenditures of $9.1$194.2 million, partially offset by treasury stock repurchases of $38.1 million and restricted stock tax withholdings of $4.6 million and cash provided by operatingused in investing activities of $39.2 million.$121.6 million, which is net of $225.2 million in net proceeds from the sale of our Metrology segment.

    Outlook/OpportunitiesBusiness Highlights of 2010

            We expect 2008Veeco's 2010 results were at record levels, with revenue of $933 million and net income from continuing operations of $261 million. These results were achieved through a combination of world-class products, a focus on high-growth market opportunities, operational excellence, our flexible manufacturing strategy, and a deep commitment to be a recovery year for Veeco in both growth and profitability. In mid 2007, John Peeler joined Veeco as its new CEO and has initiated a turnaround-plan focused on the following key initiatives:satisfying our global customers.

      Directing Veeco's resourcesVeeco increased growth and profitability in our LED & Solar segment, which is also referred to as our "green" equipment business. In LED we penetrated new customers, significantly increased our market share, increased R&D investment, launched a next-generation MOCVD system and ramped our manufacturing capacity utilizing a scalable, outsourced model. In Solar we continued to improve the best growth opportunities;process development of our CIGS product line.

      StrengtheningVeeco's Data Storage business delivered record levels of profitability over the global saleslast 5 years as a result of a turnaround in business conditions combined with our flexible manufacturing strategy.

    Outlook

            With starting backlog of $555 million, and services organization;

    Improving profitabilityanticipating strong first half 2011 bookings, we currently forecast that Veeco's 2011 revenues will be greater than $1 billion. We are optimistic about the future and believe that we are well positioned from a technology, product and operational standpoint to grow our LED & Solar and Data Storage businesses in the short term through revenue growth, gross margin improvement2011 and cost containment activities;

    Ensuring that each of Veeco's product businesses within Process Equipment and Metrology are executing well; and

    Improving Veeco's business processes to increase effectiveness, predictability and profitability.
    beyond.

            As we enter 2008,look toward the future, we see positive market conditions across severalbelieve that the HB LED industry will continue its multi-year MOCVD tool investment cycle as HB LEDs increase their penetration in backlighting applications and general illumination. We are also seeing strong interest in our thermal deposition solutions for the manufacturing of our core markets, in particular the HB-LED/wireless sector, serviced by our MOCVDCIGS solar cells, and MBE technologies. These technologies support our development and marketing of products in solar applications. It is our intention to significantly increase the research and development spending in each of these technologies to drive new product introductions. During the fourth quarter of 2007, as part of management's process improvement programs, we right-sized our data storage businesses, which included discontinuation of two product lines and consolidation of facilities. As a result of these actions, we believe that Veeco is well-alignedwell positioned to increase our customers' technology requirementsbusiness in this market. In addition, overall business conditions in our Data Storage segment appear to be continuing to improve and is equipped for improved profitability. Significant new product introductions in Metrology for the semiconductor and scientific/industrial customer base, and continued investments in technology by our customers across our end markets, lead us to currently predictwith a strong starting-year backlog, we are forecasting revenue growth at a minimumin this business in 2011.

            Our outlook discussion above constitutes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of 10% in 2008.Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our expectations regarding future results are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.

            Technology changesYou should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates they are continuing in all of our markets: the transition to perpendicular recording and larger wafer sizes in data storage; the increased usage of drives in consumer electronic applications; the increased use of our automated AFMs as critical reference tools for sub 65 nanometer semiconductor applications; and the opportunity for our MOCVD and MBE to further penetrate the emerging HB-LED and solar markets. We believe that these trends, together with the continued funding of nanoscience research, will prompt our customers to seek our next-generation solutions to address their manufacturing and technology challenges.

            While we currently expect our 2008 operating spending to increase in absolute dollars due to necessary budgeting for raises, incentive compensation and other variable costs, we believe that ourmade.



    significant cost-cutting actions in 2007 and continued cost containment focus will allow us to decrease our operating spending as a percentage of sales in 2008, and invest in future growth. In 2008, Veeco is undergoing a significant period of transition to improve its financial performance after a disappointing 2007. We will continue our focus on increasing shareholder value through operational excellence and cash generation. Our goal is to increase gross margins in 2008, with improvements in both Process Equipment and Metrology, specifically in the latter half of 2008 as revenues are forecasted to increase. We anticipate that progress in this area will continue to come from activities such as better supply chain management, including outsourcing of new products, differentiated, value-added new product introductions which focus on achieving better gross margins, and development of common hardware and software platforms. Additionally, we plan to incur an additional $3.5 million to $4.0 million in non-cash restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2008 as we consolidate our headquarters into our Plainview, New York facilities.

    Results of Operations

    Years Ended December 31, 20072010 and 20062009

            The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales and comparisons between 20072010 and 20062009 (dollars in 000s):

     
     Year ended
    December 31,

      
      
     
     
     Dollar and
    Percentage
    Change
    Year to Year

     
     
     2007
     2006
     
    Net sales $402,475 100.0%$441,034 100.0%$(38,559)(8.7)%
    Cost of sales  244,964 60.9  246,910 56.0  (1,946)(0.8)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Gross profit  157,511 39.1  194,124 44.0  (36,613)(18.9)
    Operating expenses:                
     Selling, general, and administrative expense  90,972 22.6  93,110 21.1  (2,138)(2.3)
     Research and development expense  61,174 15.2  61,925 14.0  (751)(1.2)
     Amortization expense  10,250 2.5  16,045 3.6  (5,795)(36.1)
     Restructuring expense  6,726 1.7   0.0  6,726 100.0 
     Asset impairment charge  1,068 0.3   0.0  1,068 100.0 
     Write-off of purchased in-process technology   0.0  1,160 0.3  (1,160)(100.0)
     Other income, net  (618)(0.2) (572)(0.1) 46 8.0 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total operating expenses  169,572 42.1  171,668 38.9  (2,096)(1.2)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Operating (loss) income  (12,061)(3.0) 22,456 5.1  (34,517)153.7 
    Interest expense  6,976 1.7  9,194 2.1  (2,218)(24.1)
    Interest income  (3,963)(1.0) (4,926)(1.1) (963)(19.5)
    Gain on extinguishment of debt  (738)(0.1) (330)(0.1) 408 123.6 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    (Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest  (14,336)(3.6) 18,518 4.2  (32,854)(177.4)
    Income tax provision  3,651 0.9  4,959 1.1  (1,308)(26.4)
    Noncontrolling interest  (628)(0.2) (1,358)(0.3) (730)(53.8)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net (loss) income $(17,359)(4.3)%$14,917 3.4%$(32,276)(216.4)%
      
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, Dollar and
    Percentage
    Change
    Year to Year
     
     
     2010 2009 

    Net sales

     $933,231  100.0%$282,412  100.0%$650,819  230.5%

    Cost of sales

      489,406  52.4  171,177  60.6  318,229  185.9 
                  

    Gross profit

      443,825  47.6  111,235  39.4  332,590  299.0 

    Operating expenses (income):

                       

    Selling, general and administrative

      91,777  9.8  62,151  22.0  29,626  47.7 

    Research and development

      71,390  7.6  43,483  15.4  27,907  64.2 

    Amortization

      4,876  0.5  5,168  1.8  (292) (5.7)

    Restructuring

      (179)   4,837  1.7  (5,016) * 

    Asset impairment

          304  0.1  (304) (100.0)

    Other, net

      (1,614) (0.2) 24  0.0  (1,638) * 
                  

    Total operating expenses

      166,250  17.8  115,967  41.1  50,283  43.4 
                  

    Operating income (loss)

      277,575  29.7  (4,732) (1.7) 282,307  * 

    Interest expense, net

      6,572  0.7  6,850  2.4  (278) (4.1)
                  

    Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

      271,003  29.0  (11,582) (4.1) 282,585  * 

    Income tax provision

      10,472  1.1  2,647  0.9  7,825  295.6 
                  

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

      260,531  27.9  (14,229) (5.0) 274,760  * 

    Discontinued operations:

                       
     

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes (includes gain on disposal of $156,290 in 2010)

      155,455  16.7  (2,703) (1.0) 158,158  * 
     

    Income tax provision (benefit)

      54,226  5.8  (1,300) (0.5) 55,526  * 
                  

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

      101,229  10.8  (1,403) (0.5) 102,632  * 
                  

    Net income (loss)

      361,760  38.8  (15,632) (5.5) 377,392  * 

    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

          (65) 0.1  65  (100.0)
                  

    Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

     $361,760  38.8%$(15,567) (5.5)%$377,327  * 
                  

    *
    Not Meaningful

    Net Sales and Orders

            Net sales of $402.5$933.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20072010, were down 8.7%,up 230.5% compared to 2006.2009. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment by industry, and by region (dollars in 000s):

     
     Sales
     Orders
      
      
     
     Year ended December 31,
     Dollar and Percentage Change
     Year ended December 31,
     Dollar and Percentage Change
     Book to Bill Ratio
     
     2007
     2006
     Year to Year
     2007
     2006
     Year to Year
     2007
     2006
    Segment Analysis                          
     Process Equipment $252,032 $268,878 $(16,846)(6.3)%$305,633 $314,725 $(9,092)(2.9)%1.21 1.17
     Metrology  150,443  172,156  (21,713)(12.6)% 145,939  179,077  (33,138)(18.5)%0.97 1.04
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Total $402,475 $441,034 $(38,559)(8.7)%$451,572 $493,802 $(42,230)(8.6)%1.12 1.12
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Industry Analysis                          
     Data Storage $137,414 $183,877 $(46,463)(25.3)%$142,328 $208,597 $(66,269)(31.8)%1.04 1.13
     HB-LED/wireless  110,885  88,563  22,322 25.2% 158,151  111,273  46,878 42.1%1.43 1.26
     Semiconductor  37,574  57,628  (20,054)(34.8)% 32,245  64,153  (31,908)(49.7)%0.86 1.11
     Scientific Research and Industrial  116,602  110,966  5,636 5.1% 118,848  109,779  9,069 8.3%1.02 0.99
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Total $402,475 $441,034 $(38,559)(8.7)%$451,572 $493,802 $(42,230)(8.6)%1.12 1.12
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Regional Analysis(1)                          
     North America $130,500 $151,686 $(21,186)(14.0)%$150,748 $169,536 $(18,788)(11.1)%1.16 1.12
     Europe  77,985  69,310  8,675 12.5% 106,178  65,988  40,190 60.9%1.36 0.95
     Japan  55,815  57,241  (1,426)(2.5)% 48,764  60,523  (11,759)(19.4)%0.87 1.06
     Asia Pacific  138,175  162,797  (24,622)(15.1)% 145,882  197,755  (51,873)(26.2)%1.06 1.21
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Total $402,475 $441,034 $(38,559)(8.7)%$451,572 $493,802 $(42,230)(8.6)%1.12 1.12
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    (1)
    The prior period has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

     
     Sales Orders 
     
     Year ended
    December 31,
     Dollar and Percentage
    Change
     Year ended
    December 31,
     Dollar and Percentage
    Change
     Book to Bill
    Ratio
     
     
     2010 2009 Year to Year 2010 2009 Year to Year 2010 2009 

    Segment Analysis

                                   
     

    LED & Solar

     $797,904 $205,153 $592,751  288.9%$968,232 $440,784 $527,448  119.7% 1.21  2.15 
     

    Data Storage

      135,327  77,259  58,068  75.2  153,406  97,497  55,909  57.3  1.13  1.26 
                          
     

    Total

     $933,231 $282,412 $650,819  230.5%$1,121,638 $538,281 $583,357  108.4% 1.20  1.91 
                          

    Regional Analysis

                                   
     

    Americas

     $94,985 $60,730 $34,255  56.4%$107,128 $78,196 $28,932  37.0% 1.13  1.29 
                          
     

    Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA")

      92,112  50,088  42,024  83.9  83,784  47,186  36,598  77.6  0.91  0.94 
                          
      

    Korea

      301,026  99,132  201,894  203.7  207,337  236,114  (28,777) (12.2) 0.69  2.38 
      

    China

      266,813  31,114  235,699  757.5  537,740  90,724  447,016  492.7  2.02  2.92 
      

    Taiwan

      101,130  13,882  87,248  628.5  112,016  34,642  77,374  223.4  1.11  2.50 
      

    Other Asia Pacific

      77,165  27,466  49,699  180.9  73,633  51,419  22,214  43.2  0.95  1.87 
                          
     

    Asia Pacific

      746,134  171,594  574,540  334.8  930,726  412,899  517,827  125.4  1.25  2.41 
                          
     

    Total

     $933,231 $282,412 $650,819  230.5%$1,121,638 $538,281 $583,357  108.4% 1.20  1.91 
                          

            By segment, Process EquipmentLED & Solar sales were down 6.3%. The decreaseincreased 288.9% in Process Equipment sales was primarily2010 due to increases in shipments of our newest systems as compared to 2009 (334 system shipments in 2010 versus 72 system shipments in 2009 in our MOCVD business) as a decrease in sales to customers in the data storage industry due to reduced requirements for capacity purchases in 2007. Partially offsetting this decline wasresult of an increase in demand for HB LED backlighting applications and general illumination. Data Storage sales to the HB-LED/wireless market resultingalso increased 75.2%, primarily from theas a result of an increase in end user demand due to expanding applications for HB-LEDs. Metrology sales decreased 12.6%, primarily due to decreased purchases of automated AFM products in the semiconductor market and optical metrology products in thecapital spending by data storage market. Process Equipmentcustomers for capacity and technology buys. LED & Solar sales represented 62.6%85.5% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2007,2010, up from 61.0%72.6% in the prior year period. Metrologyyear. Data Storage sales accounted for 37.4%14.5% of totalnet sales, for the year ended December 31, 2007, down from 39.0%27.4% in the prior year period.year. By region, net sales increased by 12.5%334.8% in Europe, whileAsia Pacific, primarily due to MOCVD sales to HB LED customers. In addition, sales in Asia-Pacificthe Americas and North America declined 15.1%EMEA also increased 56.4% and 14.0%83.9%, respectively. We believe that there will continue to be period-to-periodyear-to-year variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

            Orders in 2007 decreased 8.6%2010 increased 108.4% compared to 2006. The decrease was caused by an 18.5% decrease in Metrology orders due2009, primarily attributable to a decrease in orders for automated AFM products, principally to semiconductor customers and a decrease in orders for optical metrology products, principally to data storage customers. Process Equipment orders decreased 2.9% due primarily from a decrease in orders for Ion Beam and Slider equipment as a result of a decrease in customer demand in the data storage industry, offset by an119.7% increase in MOCVDLED & Solar orders that were principally driven by HB LED manufacturers increasing production for television and MBElaptop backlighting applications. Data Storage orders resultingincreased 57.3% from anthe continued increase in purchases in the HB-LED/wireless market.our customer's capital spending for capacity and technology buys.

            Our book-to-bill ratio for 2007,2010, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was 1.12, which is consistent with the comparable 2006 period.1.20 to 1 compared to 1.91 to 1 in 2009. Our backlog as of December 31, 20072010 was $173.5$555.0 million, compared to



    $140.8 $377.3 million as of December 31, 2006.2009. During the year ended December 31, 2007,2010, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $16.4$10.7 million, drivenconsisting of $12.5 million for order adjustments ($10.2 million is related to our Solar and MBE businesses), offset by order cancellations from data storage customers$1.8 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation. For certain sales arrangements we require a deposit for products thata portion of the sales price before shipment. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 we discontinued. Due to changing business conditionshad deposits and customer requirements, we may continue to experience cancellations and/or reschedulingadvanced billings of orders.$129.2 million and $59.8 million, respectively.


    Gross Profit

            Gross profit was $443.8 million or 47.6% for 2007 was 39.1%,2010 compared to 44.0%$111.2 million or 39.4% in 2009. LED & Solar gross margins increased to 47.4% from 40.4% in the comparable prior year, period. Process Equipmentprimarily due to increases in volume (262 additional system shipments and 185 additional final acceptances received compared to prior year in our MOCVD business) and higher average selling prices coupled with lower manufacturing costs. Data Storage gross margin decreased slightlymargins increased to 48.5% from 36.6% in the prior year. This was caused by a decrease in the margin for Ion Beam products from 45.8% in the 2006 period to 38.5% in the current comparable periodyear due to an unfavorable product mix, as well as the decrease inincreased sales volume to customers in the data storage market. Thisand a favorable product mix. During 2009, Data Storage gross margin wasmargins were also negatively impacted by a charge to cost of $4.8sales of $1.5 million for the write-offwrite off of inventory associated with several discontinued data storagelegacy product lines. However, these decreases were offset by a significant improvement in MOCVD product gross margins from 26.6% in 2006 to 37.6% in 2007 due to an increase in sales volume, as well as a significant improvement in mix and price. Metrology gross margins decreased to 44.1% from 51.5%, principally due to lower sales volume of automated AFM and optical metrology products and less favorable product mix in AFM products sold to scientific and research customers.

    Operating Expenses

            Selling, general and administrative expenses decreasedincreased by $2.1$29.6 million or 47.7%, from the prior year primarily attributable to a decreasesupport the business ramp in bonus, profit sharing, and commission expenses related to the reduction in domestic sales, as well as reduced legal fees. The decrease was offset by an increase in non-cash compensation expense related to stock options and restricted shares, and an increase in executive stay and sign-on bonuses.our LED & Solar segment. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 22.6%9.8% of net sales in 2007,2010, compared with 21.1%22.0% of net sales in the prior year period.year.

            Research and development expense decreased $0.8increased $27.9 million or 64.2% from the comparable prior year, period, primarily due to prior yearcontinued product development effortsin areas of high-growth for Process Equipment products that were introduced during 2007.end market opportunities in our LED & Solar segment. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense decreased to 7.6% from 15.4% in the prior year.

            Amortization expense decreased $0.3 million or 5.7% from the prior year. This decrease is mainly due to certain intangibles being fully amortized at the end of 2009.

            Restructuring credit of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, was attributable to a change in estimate in our Data Storage segment. Restructuring expense of $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, consisted primarily of personnel severance costs of $3.4 million associated with the reduction of approximately 164 employees in our workforce. Additionally, we took a $1.4 million charge during the second quarter of 2009 for costs associated with vacating a leased facility in Camarillo, California and the related relocation of 27 employees.

            During 2009, the Company recorded a $0.3 million asset impairment charge. The charge was for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage segment.

    Interest Expense, net

            Interest expense, net for 2010 was $6.6 million, comprised of $4.7 million in cash interest and $3.5 million in non-cash interest primarily relating to our convertible debt, partially offset by $1.6 million in interest income earned on our cash and short-term investment balances. Interest expense, net for 2009 was $6.9 million, comprised of $4.9 million in cash interest and $2.8 million in non-cash interest, partially offset by $0.8 million in interest income. The non-cash interest expense is related to accounting rules that requires a portion of convertible debt to be allocated to equity in 2010 and 2009 and accretion of debt discounts and amortization of debt premiums related to our short-term investments in 2010.

    Income Taxes

            The income tax provision attributable to continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $10.5 million compared to $2.6 million or 22.9% of income before taxes in the prior year. The 2010 provision for income taxes included $8.0 million relating to our foreign operations and $2.5 million relating to our domestic operations. The 2009 provision for income taxes included $1.6 million relating to our foreign operations and $1.0 million relating to our domestic operations. Our effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate as a result of the utilization of our domestic net



    operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. It is anticipated that our effective tax rate for 2011 will approach the U.S. statutory rate

    Discontinued Operations

            Discontinued operations represent the results of the operations of our disposed Metrology segment which was sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010, reported as discontinued operations. The 2010 results reflect an operational loss before taxes of $0.8 million and a gain on disposal of $156.3 million before taxes.

    Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

            The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between 2009 and 2008 (dollars in 000s):

     
     Year ended December 31, Dollar and
    Percentage
    Change
    Year to Year
     
     
     2009 2008 

    Net sales

     $282,412  100.0%$314,935  100.0%$(32,523) (10.3)%

    Cost of sales

      171,177  60.6  191,664  60.9  (20,487) (10.7)
                  

    Gross profit

      111,235  39.4  123,271  39.1  (12,036) (9.8)

    Operating expenses (income):

                       

    Selling, general and administrative

      62,151  22.0  60,542  19.2  1,609  2.7 

    Research and development

      43,483  15.4  39,608  12.6  3,875  9.8 

    Amortization

      5,168  1.8  8,864  2.8  (3,696) (41.7)

    Restructuring

      4,837  1.7  9,424  3.0  (4,587) (48.7)

    Asset impairment

      304  0.1  51,387  16.3  (51,083) (99.4)

    Other, net

      24    (414) (0.1) 438  * 
                  

    Total operating expenses

      115,967  41.1  169,411  53.8  (53,444) (31.5)
                  

    Operating loss

      (4,732) (1.7) (46,140) (14.7) 41,408  (89.7)

    Interest expense, net

      6,850  2.4  6,729  2.1  121  1.8 

    Gain on extinguishment of debt

          (3,758) (1.2) 3,758  (100.0)
                  

    Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

      (11,582) (4.1) (49,111) (15.6) 37,529  (76.4)

    Income tax provision

      2,647  0.9  1,722  0.5  925  53.7 
                  

    Loss from continuing operations

      (14,229) (5.0) (50,833) (16.1) 36,604  (72.0)

    Discontinued operations:

                       
     

    Loss from discontinued operations, before income taxes

      (2,703) (1.0) (24,418) (7.8) 21,715  (88.9)
     

    Income tax (benefit) provision

      (1,300) (0.5) 170  0.1  (1,470) * 
                  

    Loss from discontinued operations

      (1,403) (0.5) (24,588) (7.8) 23,185  (94.3)
                  

    Net loss

      (15,632) (5.5) (75,421) (23.9) 59,789  (79.3)

    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

      (65)   (230) (0.1) 165  (71.7)
                  

    Net loss attributable to Veeco

     $(15,567) (5.5)%$(75,191) (23.9)%$59,624  (79.3)%
                  

    *
    Not Meaningful

    Net Sales and Orders

            Net sales of $282.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, were down 10.3% compared to 2008. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment and by region (dollars in 000s):

     
     Sales Orders  
      
     
     
     Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Book to Bill Ratio 
     
     2009 2008 Year to Year 2009 2008 Year to Year 2009 2008 

    Segment Analysis

                                   
     

    LED & Solar

     $205,153 $165,812 $39,341  23.7%$440,784 $160,162 $280,622  175.2% 2.15  0.97 
     

    Data Storage

      77,259  149,123  (71,864) (48.2) 97,497  138,653  (41,156) (29.7) 1.26  0.93 
                          
     

    Total

     $282,412 $314,935 $(32,523) (10.3)%$538,281 $298,815 $239,466  80.1% 1.91  0.95 
                          

    Regional Analysis

                                   
     

    Americas

     $60,730 $130,573 $(69,843) (53.5)%$78,196 $108,172 $(29,976) (27.7)% 1.29  0.83 
                          
     

    EMEA

      50,088  57,567  (7,479) (13.0) 47,186  51,731  (4,545) (8.8) 0.94  0.90 
                          
      

    Korea

      99,132  8,887  90,245  1,015.5  236,114  15,864  220,250  1,388.4  2.38  1.79 
      

    China

      31,114  19,575  11,539  58.9  90,724  32,202  58,522  181.7  2.92  1.65 
      

    Taiwan

      13,882  39,124  (25,242) (64.5) 34,642  30,999  3,643  11.8  2.50  0.79 
      

    Other Asia Pacific

      27,466  59,209  (31,743) (53.6) 51,419  59,847  (8,428) (14.1) 1.87  1.01 
                          
     

    Asia Pacific

      171,594  126,795  44,799  35.3  412,899  138,912  273,987  197.2  2.41  1.10 
                          
     

    Total

     $282,412 $314,935 $(32,523) (10.3)%$538,281 $298,815 $239,466  80.1% 1.91  0.95 
                          

            By segment, LED & Solar sales increased 23.7% due to an increase in end user demand for HB LED backlighting applications, higher average selling prices and strong customer acceptance of Veeco's newest generation systems. Offsetting this increase, Data Storage sales were down 48.2%, primarily as a result of a slowdown in capital spending by data storage customers. LED & Solar sales represented 72.6% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2009, up from 52.6% in the prior year. Data Storage sales accounted for 27.4% of net sales, down from 47.4% in the prior year. By region, net sales increased by 35.3% in Asia Pacific, primarily due to MOCVD sales to HB LED customers, while sales in the Americas and EMEA declined 53.5% and 13.0%, respectively.

            Orders in 2009 increased 80.1% compared to 2008, primarily attributable to a 175.2% increase in LED & Solar orders that were principally driven by HB LED manufacturers increasing production for television and laptop backlighting applications and demand for CIGS deposition systems and components. Data Storage orders declined 29.7% from the continued slow down in our customers capital spending.

            Our book-to-bill ratio for 2009 was 1.91 to 1 compared to 0.95 to 1 in 2008. Our backlog as of December 31, 2009 was $377.3 million, compared to $125.6 million as of December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $4.1 million, consisting of $3.2 million for order cancellations, primarily in the first half of the year, and $0.9 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation. For certain sales arrangements we require a deposit for a portion of the sales price before shipment. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 we had deposits and advanced billings of $59.8 million and $16.1 million, respectively.

    Gross Profit

            Gross profit increased to $111.2 million or 39.4% in 2009 compared to $123.3 million or 39.1% in 2008. Despite the overall $32.5 million decrease in sales, gross margin remained flat, primarily due to the favorable impact of significant cost reductions from a reduced workforce, lower facilities costs associated with closing and consolidating facilities and the outsourcing of certain Data Storage product manufacturing to Asia. LED & Solar gross margins increased from 38.3% in the prior year to 40.4%,



    primarily due to the impact of our lower fixed cost structure and a 23.7% increase in sales volume as well as favorable pricing and higher margins on new MOCVD products. Data Storage gross margins decreased from 40.2% in the prior year to 36.6% mainly due to decreased sales volume partially offset by reduced costs due to our expense reduction plans compared to the prior year. Data Storage gross margins were also negatively impacted by a charge to cost of sales of $1.5 million during 2009 for the write off of inventory associated with discontinued legacy product lines.

    Operating Expenses

            Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.6 million or 2.7%, from the prior year primarily due to the ramp-up in our MOCVD business in the second half of 2009. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 22.0% of net sales in 2009, compared with 19.2% of net sales in the prior year.

            Research and development expense increased $3.9 million or 9.8% from the prior year, primarily due to investments in areas that we believe are higher-growth end market opportunities, particularly in our LED & Solar segment. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense increased to 15.2%15.4% from 14.0%12.6% in the prior year period.year.

            Amortization expense decreased by $5.8$3.7 million or 41.7% from the prior yearyear. This decrease is mainly due to certain technology-based intangibles becomingin LED & Solar being fully amortized at the end of 2008 as well as the write-off of purchased technology in Data Storage in connection with the asset impairment charges recorded during 2007.the fourth quarter of 2008.

            Restructuring expense of $6.7$4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 was principally a result2009, consisted primarily of personnel severance costs of $4.9$3.4 million associated with a costthe reduction plan initiated by management during 2007.of approximately 164 employees in our workforce. Additionally, we incurred $1.8took a $1.4 million ofcharge during 2009 for costs for purchase commitments associated with certain discontinued product lines. No such restructuring expenses werevacating a leased facility in Camarillo, California, during the second quarter and the related relocation of 27 employees.

            During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $0.3 million asset impairment charge. The charge was for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage reporting unit. During 2008, the prior year period.

            AssetCompany recorded a $51.4 million asset impairment chargescharge, of which $51.1 million was recorded during the fourth quarter and $0.3 million was recorded during the first quarter. The fourth quarter charge consisted of $30.4 million related to goodwill, $19.6 million related to intangible assets and $1.1 million incurred during 2007 were attributable to the write-offin property, plant and equipment. The first quarter charge consisted of certain$0.3 million associated with property and equipment associated with the discontinued product lines. No such asset impairment charges were recorded in the prior year period.

            During the third quarter of 2006, we finalized the purchase accounting for our acquisition of 19.9%abandoned as part of the stock of Fluens, and determined that Fluens is a variable interest entity and that we are its primary beneficiary. Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by a Senior Vice Presidentconsolidation of our Company. As such, we have consolidated the results of Fluens' operations from the acquisition date, and have attributed the 80.1% portion that is not owned by Veeco to noncontrolling interest incorporate headquarters into our consolidated financial statements. As part of this acquisition accounting, we recorded $1.2 million of in-process technology, which was written off during the third quarter of 2006. No such costs were recorded during 2007.Plainview facility.


    Interest Expense, and Interest Incomenet

            Interest expense, net for 2007 decreased2009 was $6.9 million, comprised of $4.9 million in cash interest and $2.8 million in non-cash interest relating to our convertible debt, partially offset by $2.2$0.8 million in interest income earned on our cash and short-term investment balances. Interest expense, net for 2008 was $6.7 million, comprised of $6.4 million in cash interest and $2.9 million in non-cash interest, partially offset by $2.6 million in interest income. The non-cash interest expense in both years is related to accounting rules that requires a portion of convertible debt to be allocated to equity. The decrease of $1.5 million in cash interest expense from the prior year period,was primarily due to the early extinguishmentrepayment of $56.0$25.3 million of our convertible subordinated notes during 2007 (see below).in the fourth quarter of 2008. Interest income decreased by $1.0$1.7 million due principally to the lower averageinterest rate yields on cash balances invested during 2009 compared to the currentprior year.


    Gain on Extinguishment of Debt

            During 2007,the fourth quarter of 2008, we repurchased $56.0made two repurchases of $12.2 million in aggregate principal amount of our convertible subordinated notes for $7.2 million in cash, of which $7.1 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0$117.8 million to $144.0 million. The repurchase amount was $55.1 million in cash, of which $54.8 million related to principal and $0.3 million related to accrued interest. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.7 million. In the comparable 2006 period, we repurchased $20.0 million of our convertible subordinated notes reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0$105.6 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3approximately $3.8 million. There were no repurchases during 2009.

    Income Taxes

            The income tax provision attributable to continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20072009 was $3.7$2.6 million compared to $5.0$1.7 million in the comparable prior year. The 20072009 provision for income taxes included $2.2$1.6 million relating to our foreign operations which continue to be profitable, and $1.5$1.0 million relating to our domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carry forwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, our domestic operations are not expected to incur significant federal income taxes foruntil such time as the foreseeable future. The 2006 provision for income taxes included $3.6 million relating to our foreign operations and $1.4 million relating to our domestic operations.net operating losses are utilized.

    Noncontrolling InterestDiscontinued Operations

            Noncontrolling interest was a credit to income of $0.6 million forDiscontinued operations represent the year ended December 31, 2007 and a credit of $1.4 million in the comparable prior year period. As we are the primary beneficiary of Fluens, a variable interest entity, we are required to consolidate Fluens and eliminate the portion of its results attributable to noncontrolling interests. As a result, we eliminate from our net income 80.1% of Fluens' operating losses. The credit in the prior comparable period includes the elimination of 80.1% of the write-off of in-process technology recorded in the third quarter of 2006.


    Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

            The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between 2006 and 2005 (dollars in 000s):

     
     Year ended
    December 31,

      
      
     
     
     Dollar and
    Percentage
    Change
    Year to Year

     
     
     2006
     2005
     
    Net sales $441,034 100.0%$410,190 100.0%$30,844 7.5%
    Cost of sales  246,910 56.0  236,090 57.6  10,820 4.6 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Gross profit  194,124 44.0  174,100 42.4  20,024 11.5 
    Operating expenses:                
     Selling, general, and administrative expense  93,110 21.1  84,667 20.6  8,443 10.0 
     Research and development expense  61,925 14.0  60,382 14.7  1,543 2.6 
     Amortization expense  16,045 3.6  16,583 4.0  (538)(3.2)
     Other (income) expense, net  (572)(0.1) 237 0.1  (809)(341.4)
     Restructuring expense   0.0  1,165 0.3  (1,165)(100.0)
     Write-off of purchased in-process technology  1,160 0.3     1,160 100.0 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total operating expenses  171,668 38.9  163,034 39.7  8,634 5.3 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Operating income  22,456 5.1  11,066 2.7  11,390 102.9 
    Interest expense  9,194 2.1  10,203 2.5  (1,009)(9.9)
    Interest income  (4,926)(1.1) (2,635)(0.7)  (2,291)86.9 
    Gain on extinguishment of debt  (330)(0.1)    (330)100.0 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest  18,518 4.2  3,498 0.9  15,020 429.4 
    Income tax provision  4,959 1.1  4,395 1.1  564 12.8 
    Noncontrolling interest  (1,358)(0.3)    (1,358)100.0 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net income (loss) $14,917 3.4%$(897)(0.2)%$15,814 1,763.0%
      
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Net Sales

            Net sales of $441.0 million for 2006 were up 7.5% from 2005. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment, by industry, and by region (dollars in 000s):

     
     Sales
     Orders
      
      
     
     Year ended December 31,
     Dollar and Percentage Change
     Year ended December 31,
     Dollar and Percentage Change
     Book to Bill Ratio
     
     2006
     2005
     Year to Year
     2006
     2005
     Year to Year
     2006
     2005
    Segment Analysis                          
     Process Equipment $268,878 $227,861 $41,017 18.0%$314,725 $228,725 $86,000 37.6%1.17 1.00
     Metrology  172,156  182,329  (10,173)(5.6) 179,077  176,055  3,022 1.7 1.04 0.97
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Total $441,034 $410,190 $30,844 7.5%$493,802 $404,780 $89,022 22.0%1.12 0.99
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Industry Analysis                          
     Data Storage $183,877 $167,420 $16,457 9.8%$208,597 $166,000 $42,597 25.7%1.13 0.99
     HB-LED/wireless  88,563  62,566  25,997 41.6  111,273  62,390  48,883 78.4 1.26 1.00
     Semiconductor  57,628  69,207  (11,579)(16.7) 64,153  66,413  (2,260)(3.4)1.11 0.96
     Scientific Research and Industrial  110,966  110,997  (31)(0.0) 109,779  109,977  (198)(0.2)0.99 0.99
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Total $441,034 $410,190 $30,844 7.5%$493,802 $404,780 $89,022 22.0%1.12 0.99
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Regional Analysis(1)                          
     North America $151,686 $143,004 $8,682 6.1%$169,536 $137,243 $32,293 23.5%1.12 0.96
     Europe  69,310  81,476  (12,166)(14.9) 65,988  72,937  (6,949)(9.5)0.95 0.90
     Japan  57,241  66,500  (9,259)(13.9) 60,523  64,797  (4,274)(6.6)1.06 0.97
     Asia Pacific  162,797  119,210  43,587 36.6  197,755  129,803  67,952 52.4 1.21 1.09
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Total $441,034 $410,190 $30,844 7.5%$493,802 $404,780 $89,022 22.0%1.12 0.99
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    (1)
    The prior period has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

            In 2006, Process Equipment sales were up 18.0%, primarily due to sales to HB-LED/wireless and data storage customers. The increases in these areas were driven by the increased use of hard drives in consumer electronics and improved conditions within the HB-LED/wireless market. Metrology sales decreased by 5.6% primarily due to a decrease in AFM sales to customers in the semiconductor industry. In 2006, we continued to experience an increase in sales to Asia Pacific and North America, which increased 36.6% and 6.1%, respectively. These increases were partially offset by 14.9% and 13.9% decreases in sales to Europe and Japan, respectively. We believe that there will continue to be period-to-period variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

            Orders were up 22.0% in 2006 compared to 2005. By segment, Process Equipment orders increased by 37.6%, due to improved data storage industry conditions resulting from the expanded use of hard drives in consumer electronics and improved conditions within the HB-LED/wireless market. Metrology orders remained relatively flat compared to 2005. By industry, orders from data storage customers increased 25.7%, resulting from technology changes requiring increases in equipment capital expenditures. HB-LED/wireless orders increased 78.4%, predominantly due to a significant increase in demand for MOCVD systems. Regionally, the 52.4% and 23.5% increases in orders to the Asia Pacific region and North America were partially offset by decreased orders in Europe of 9.5% and Japan of 6.6%.

            The book-to-bill ratio for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in that same time period, was 1.12 to 1. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we experienced order cancellations and adjustments of $26.0 million, primarily in the HB-LED/wireless industry for MOCVD products, as well as cancellations for AFM products. We also experienced rescheduling of order delivery dates by customers. Due to



    changing business conditions and customer requirements, we may continue to experience cancellations and/or rescheduling of orders.

    Gross Profit

            Gross profit in 2006 increased as a percentage of net sales to 44.0% from 42.4% in 2005. Process Equipment gross margins increased to 39.3% from 35.3% in 2005, primarily due to an increase in sales volume of $41.0 million, improved product mix, cost reductions, and improved supply chain management, which included outsourcing. Metrology gross margins increased slightly, to 51.5% in 2006 from 51.4% in 2005.

    Operating Expenses

            Selling, general, and administrative expense increased 10.0%, principally due to higher personnel costs, including increased bonus and profit sharing expenses, higher non-cash compensation related to stock options and restricted shares, as well as annual salary increases. In addition, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased due to increased consulting costs related to implementation of a new company-wide integrated applications software, litigation related expenses for the securities class action and consolidated derivative action lawsuits as well as expansion of field sales and marketing personnel to support our new product introductions and our Asia Pacific operations including travel and related expenses.

            Research and development expense increased $1.5 million, principally resulting from new product development efforts in Ion Beam and MOCVD.

            Amortization expense totaled $16.0 million, or 3.6% of sales, in 2006, compared with $16.6 million, or 4.0% of sales, in 2005. This $0.6 million decrease is attributable to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

            We incurred restructuring expenses of $1.2 million during 2005, which consisted of personnel severance costs related to consolidation and cost reduction actions. As of December 31, 2006, the entire amount of these charges had been paid. (See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for details).

            As part of the purchase accounting adjustments made in connection with the acquisition of 19.9% of the common stock of Fluens, a variable interest entity, we recorded $1.2 million of in-process research and development projects, which were written off during 2006. No such costs were recorded during 2005.

            Other income, net, was $0.6 million in 2006 compared with other expense, net of $0.2 million in 2005. The change was primarily due to $0.4 million loss realized in 2005 on the sale of fixed assets, miscellaneous income in 2006 related to the sale of one of our domain names and a reduction in foreign currency exchange losses.

    Interest Expense and Interest Income

            Interest expense totaled $9.2 million in 2006, compareddisposed Metrology segment, which was sold to $10.2 million in 2005. This reduction in interest expense was related to the early extinguishment of debt.

            Interest income totaled $4.9 million in 2006, compared to $2.6 million in 2005. The change was due to the increase in interest rates and higher cash balances invested during 2006.

    GainBruker on Extinguishment of Debt

            During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of our convertible subordinated notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. The repurchase amount



    was $19.5 million in cash, of which $19.4 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3 million.

    Income Taxes

            Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2006, amounted to $5.0 million, or 26.8% of income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest as compared to $4.4 million, or 125.6% of income before income taxes in 2005. (See Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for details). The 2006 provision for income taxes included $3.6 million relating to our foreign operations, which continue to be profitable, and $1.4 million relating to our domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carryforwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, our domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we released $2.2 million of our valuation allowance due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards. The 2005 provision for income taxes primarily related to our foreign operations, which were profitable.

    Noncontrolling Interest

            Noncontrolling interest was a credit to income of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. As we are the primary beneficiary of Fluens, a variable interest entity as defined by FIN46(R), we are required to consolidate Fluens and eliminate the portion of its results attributable to noncontrolling interests. As a result, we eliminated from our net income 80.1% of the write-off of Fluens' in-process technology and Fluens' operating losses since the acquisition date.October 7, 2010.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

            Historically, our principal capital requirements have included the funding of acquisitions, capital expenditures and capital expenditures.the repayment of debt. We traditionally have generated cash from operations and debt and stock issuances. Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations is dependent on the continued demand for our products and services.

            Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 20072010 was $117.1$245.1 million. This amount represents a decreasean increase of $30.0$96.6 million from December 31, 2006.2009. We also had short-term investments and restricted cash of $394.2 million and $76.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010. A summary of the current periodyear cash flow activity is as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     
    Net (loss) income $(17,359)$14,917 
      
     
     
    Net cash provided by operating activities $39,185 $46,015 
    Net cash used in investing activities  (8,780) (18,736)
    Net cash used in financing activities  (59,484) (4,351)
    Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents  (884) (381)
      
     
     
    Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (29,963) 22,547 
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  147,046  124,499 
      
     
     
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $117,083 $147,046 
      
     
     

     
     Year ended
    December 31,
     
     
     2010 2009 

    Net income (loss)

     $361,760 $(15,632)
          

    Net cash provided by operating activities

     $194,214 $59,038 

    Net cash used in investing activities

      (121,621) (154,765)

    Net cash provided by financing activities

      25,505  141,869 

    Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

      (1,466) (163)
          

    Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

      96,632  45,979 

    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

      148,500  102,521 
          

    Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

     $245,132 $148,500 
          

            Cash provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 20072010 was $39.2$194.2 million compared to $46.0$59.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2006.2009. The $39.2$194.2 million cash provided by operations in 2010 included adjustments to the $17.4$361.8 million of net lossincome for non-cash items, more specifically,which reduced the cash provided by net income by $168.3 million. The adjustments consisted of $12.9 million of depreciation and amortization, of $25.0 million, non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $5.6 million, and $5.9$9.6 million of non-cash charges associated with restructuringequity-based compensation expense, $3.1 million of amortization of debt discount, $(25.1) million of deferred income taxes, $(23.3) million of excess tax benefits from stock option exercises, $(156.3) million of gain on disposal of our


    Metrology segment and asset impairment. This$10.0 million of discontinued operations. Net cash provided by operations was compoundedfavorably impacted by a net $21.2$0.7 million increase fromof changes in operating assets and liabilities, which included a decreasean $83.2 million increase in accounts receivable, of $15.1a $49.5 million increase in inventories, due to lower salesthe significant increase in orders in our LED & Solar segment compared to 2009, a $23.3 million increase in supplier deposits and a $5.5 million increase in discontinued operations, partially offset by an $85.5 million increase in accrued expenses, principally resulting from customer deposits associated primarily with the significant increase in orders in our LED & Solar segment and a $78.9 million increase in income taxes payable. Cash provided by operations during the fourth quarter of 2007 as comparedyear ended December 31, 2009 was $59.0 million and included adjustments to the fourth quarter$15.6 million net loss for non-cash items, which primarily consisted of 2006. Restructuring charges$13.9 million of $3.5depreciation and amortization, $7.5 million to $4.0of non-cash stock-based compensation expense, $2.8 million are expected to be incurred in the first quarter of 2008 in connection with the consolidationamortization of our headquarters into our Plainview, NY facility. These initially will bedebt discount, a $1.5 million non-cash charges. Payments on the $4.3inventory write-off and $8.8 million restructuring reserve as of December 31, 2007 will be made over the next twelve to eighteen months. In 2006,discontinued operations. Net cash provided by operations in 2009 was $46.0 million. The $46.0 million was comprised of $14.9 million in net income and $33.4 million derived from adjustments for non-cash items (primarily depreciation and amortization expense), partially offsetfavorably impacted by a net $2.0$40.1 million decrease fromof changes in operating assets and liabilities.

            Cash used in investing activities of $8.8$121.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, resulted primarily from $506.1 million of purchases of short-term investments, $10.7 million of capital expenditures, $76.1 million of transfers to restricted cash and $0.5 million of discontinued operations, partially offset by proceeds of $33.0 million from the sale of short-term investments, $225.2 million net proceeds from the disposal of our Metrology segment and $213.6 million from the maturity of CDAR's. Cash used in investing activities of $154.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, resulted primarily from $135.0 million of purchases of short-term investments, $7.5 million of capital expenditures, $0.9 million of $9.1discontinued operations, $9.8 million partially offset by other items. Cash used in investing activities in 2006 of $18.7 million resulted primarily from capital expenditures of $17.4 million and earn-out payments totaling $3.1 million to the former owners of TurboDiscbusinesses acquired and Nanodevices Inc.,$2.4 million for certain acquisitions, partially offset by the net satisfaction of an escrow account related to a prior year acquisition. In 2008, we expect to invest approximately $15.0 million in total capital expenditures primarily related to engineering equipment and lab tools used in producing, testing, and process development for our products, which will include an increased focus on the LED and solar market products, as well as enhanced manufacturing facilities and the continuing implementation of SAP and related computer systems.

            Cash used in financing activities of $59.5 million in 2007 primarily consisted of cash used in the repurchase of $56.0 million of our outstanding convertible subordinated notes for $55.1 million in cash, as discussed below, as well as a balloon payment of $5.2 million made to satisfy the mortgage on our Santa Barbara, California facility. This is compounded by payments of debt issuance costs of $1.6 million associated with our new convertible subordinated notes and our new revolving credit facility (discussed below) and is partially offset by $3.2$0.8 million of proceeds from common stock issuances resulting from the exercisesale of employee stock optionsproperty, plant and the purchase of shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.equipment.

            Cash used inprovided by financing activities of $4.4$25.5 million in 2006during the year ended December 31, 2010, consisted primarily consistedof $45.2 million of cash used in the repurchase of a portion of our outstanding convertible subordinated notes, as discussed below,proceeds from stock option exercises and $23.3 million excess tax benefits from stock options exercises, partially offset by $15.5$4.6 million of restricted stock tax withholdings, $38.1 million of purchases of treasury stock and $0.2 million of repayments of long-term debt. Cash provided by financing activities of $141.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, consisted primarily of $130.1 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock issuances resultingthrough a secondary public offering and $12.6 million from stock option exercises partially offset by $0.6 million of restricted stock tax withholdings and $0.2 million of repayments of long-term debt.

            As of December 31, 2010 we had notes of $105.6 million principal amount outstanding. The notes accrue interest at 4.125% per annum and mature on April 15, 2012. The notes meet the exercisecriteria for determining the effect of employeethe assumed conversion using the treasury stock optionsmethod of accounting, since we have the ability and the purchase of shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

            On December 21, 2001, we issued $200.0 million of unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 2008, and on January 3, 2002, we issued an additional $20.0 million of unsecured convertible subordinated notes pursuantintent to settle the exercise of an over-allotment option. The notes were convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $38.51 per share. We pay interest on these notes on June 21 and December 21 of each year. The notes mature on December 21, 2008. The notes are redeemable at our option at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes.

            During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of the notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. The repurchase amount was $19.5 million in cash, of which $19.4 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount $0.3 million. During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of these notes for $55.1 million,



    including accrued interest, reducing the amount of convertible subordinated notes outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million. We may engage in similar transactions in the future depending on market conditions, our cash position and other factors.

            During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the original 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the "Old Notes"). Under these agreements, such holders agreed to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregatenotes in cash. Under the terms of the notes, we may pay the principal amount of New Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 millionconverted notes in cash or in shares of the Old Notes remained outstanding. No net gain or loss was recorded on the exchange transactions since the carrying value of the Old Notes including unamortized deferred financing costs approximated the exchange value of the New Notes.common stock. We intend to pay such amounts in cash.

            The New Notesnotes are initially are convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of New Notes atnotes (equivalent to a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007). On or after April 20, 2011, we may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and the conversion premium in shares of our common stock plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. Holders may convert the notes at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events.events including our common stock trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days during the final 30 trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, our common stock was trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for the specified period and, as a result, the convertible notes are convertible during the first quarter of 2011. If the



    convertible notes are converted, we have the ability and intent to pay the principal balance of notes tendered for conversion in cash. We will re-perform this test each quarter up to and including the fourth quarter of 2011. Accordingly, the balance of the convertible notes at December 31, 2010 has been classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. On February 14, 2011, at the option of the holder, $7.5 million of notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $45.95 per share in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2011 we will take a charge for the related unamortized debt discount totaling $0.3 million. We pay interest on the New Notesthese notes on April 2015 and October 15 of each year. The notes are unsecured and are effectively subordinated to all of our senior and secured indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

            During the third quarter of 2007, we entered into a new credit agreement (the "New Credit Agreement") with HSBC Bank, as administrative agent, which amends and restates, and effectively replaces, the prior credit agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005 (the "Prior Credit Agreement"), among us and HSBC and four other banks, which was set to expire on March 15, 2008. The New Credit Agreement provides for borrowings of up to $100.0 million with an annual interest rate that is a floating rate equal to the prime rate of the agent bank. A LIBOR-based interest rate option is also provided. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements and acquisitions. The New Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, and we are required to satisfy certain financial tests under the New Credit Agreement substantially similar to those of the Prior Credit Agreement.        As of December 31, 2007,2010, we are in compliance with all covenants, as amended. Substantially allhad $76.1 million of restricted cash consisting of $22.9 million that relates to the proceeds received from the sale of our assetsMetrology segment. This cash is held in escrow and thoseis restricted from use for one year from the closing date of our material domestic subsidiaries, other than real estate, have been pledgedthe transaction to secure our obligations underany losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we made in the New Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility understock purchase agreement and related documents. Additionally, we also had restricted cash consisting of $53.2 million which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance that the New Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2012.Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is held in custody by the issuing bank, and is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.

            As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were no borrowings or unsecured letters of credit outstanding.

            At December 31, 2007,2010, our contractual cash obligations and commitments are as follows (in thousands):

     
     Payments due by period
    Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments

     Total
     Less than 1 year
     1-3 years
     3-5 years
     More than 5 years
    Long-term debt(1) $146,585 $25,550 $408 $118,221 $2,406
    Interest on debt(1)  24,002  6,166  10,204  6,897  735
    Operating leases(2)  16,535  6,062  7,309  1,903  1,261
    Letters of credit(3)  436  436      
    Purchase commitments(4)  14,386  14,386      
      
     
     
     
     
      $201,944 $52,600 $17,921 $127,021 $4,402
      
     
     
     
     

     
     Payments due by period 
    Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments
     Total Less than
    1 year
     1-3 years 3-5 years More than
    5 years
     

    Long-term debt(1)

     $108,457 $105,803 $516 $604 $1,534 

    Interest on debt(1)

      6,976  4,575  1,833  298  270 

    Operating leases(2)

      9,464  3,915  4,083  1,236  230 

    Letters of credit and bank guarantees(3)

      136,315  136,315       

    Purchase commitments(4)

      200,296  200,296       
                

     $461,508 $450,904 $6,432 $2,138 $2,034 
                

    (1)
    Long-term debt obligations consist of repayment of our convertible subordinated notes and related interest, as well as mortgage and interest payments for our St. Paul, MN facility.

    (2)
    WeIn accordance with relevant accounting guidance, we account for our office leases as operating leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13,Accounting for Leases, with expiration dates ranging from 20082010 through 2023.2017. There are future minimum annual rental payments required under the leases. Leasehold improvements made at the beginning

      of or during a lease are amortized over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets.



    (3)
    Letters of credit are issuedIssued by our lendera bank on our behalf as needed. We had letters of credit outstanding of $0.2 million and bank guarantees outstanding of $135.8 million, of which, $83.2 million can be drawn against lines of credit in our foreign subsidiaries and $52.6 million that is collateralized against cash that is restricted from use.

    (4)
    Purchase commitments are primarily for inventory used in manufacturing our products. It has been our practice not to enter into purchase commitments extending beyond one year.

            The above table excludes $1.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for details.

            We believe that existing cash balances and short-term investments together with cash generated from operations and amounts available under our $100.0 million credit agreement will be sufficient to meet our projected working capital and other cash flow requirements for the next twelve months, as well as our contractual obligations, detailed in the above table. We believe we will be able to meet our obligation to repay the $25.2 million subordinated notes that mature on December 21, 2008 and the $117.8$105.6 million subordinated notes that mature on April 15, 2012 with available cash and short-term investments or, if necessary, through a combination of conversion of the notes outstanding, refinancing, cash generated from operations and other means.

            In 2006, we invested $0.5 million to purchase 19.9% of the common stock of Fluens. Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Veeco and Fluens have jointly developed a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications. If this development is successful and upon the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, we will be obligated to purchase the balance of the outstanding stock of Fluens for $3.0 million plus an earn-out payment to Fluens' other stockholders based on future performance.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

            We use derivativedo not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial instruments to minimizecondition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources other than operating leases, letters of credit and bank guarantees, and purchase commitments disclosed in the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on earningspreceding "Contractual Cash Obligations and cash flows. On December 27, 2007 and December 28, 2006, we entered into forward contracts for the months of January 2008 and 2007, respectively, for the notional amounts of approximately $7.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The fair values of the contracts at inception were zero, which did not significantly change at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.Commitments" table.

    Application of Critical Accounting Policies

            General:    Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, managementManagement continually monitors and evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs, and contingent liabilities, including potential litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, short-term investments, the valuation of inventories, the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the impairment of long-lived assets, fair value measurements, warranty costs, the accounting for deferredincome taxes and share-basedequity-based compensation to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved in each.

            Revenue Recognition:    We recognize revenue in accordance withbased on current accounting guidance provided by the SEC StaffSecurities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the Financial Accounting BulletinStandards Board ("SAB"FASB") No. 104,. Our revenue transactions include sales of products under multiple-element arrangements. Revenue Recognitionunder these arrangements is allocated to each element based upon its estimated fair market value.. Certain

            We consider a broad array of facts and circumstances when evaluating each of our product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. A multiple-element arrangement is a transaction which may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, or rightsdetermining when to use assets, and



    performance may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. We recognize revenue, when persuasiveincluding specific terms of the purchase order, contractual obligations to the customer, the complexity of the customer's post-delivery acceptance provisions, customer creditworthiness and the installation process. Management also considers the party responsible for installation, whether there are process specification requirements which need to be demonstrated before final sign off and payment, whether Veeco can replicate the field testing conditions and procedures in our factory and our past experience with demonstrating and installing a particular system. Sales arrangements are reviewed on a case-by-case basis; however, the Company's revenue recognition protocol for established systems is as described below.

            System revenue is generally recognized upon shipment or delivery provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price isprices are contractually fixed or determinable, and collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. For products produced according to our published specifications, whereassured and there are no material uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. Revenue from installation is required or installation is deemed perfunctory and no substantive customer acceptance provisions exist, revenueservices is recognized when title passesat the time acceptance is



    received from the customer. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales arrangement is deferred until the criteria have been met or all elements have been delivered to the customer generally upon shipment.or been completed.

            For those transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either at the time of shipment or delivery, our sales and contractual arrangements with customers do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions. In the rare instances where such provisions are included, the Company defers all revenue until customer acceptance is achieved. In cases where products produced according toare sold with a particular customer's specifications, revenue is recognized when the product has been tested, it has been demonstrated that it meets the customer's specifications and title passes to the customer. The amountretention of revenue recorded is reduced by the amount of any customer retention (generally 10% to 20%), which is nottypically payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance provisions are completed, the customer has the right to withhold this payment until installation is completed and final customer acceptance issuch provisions have been achieved. Installation is not deemed to be essential toWe defer the functionalitygreater of the equipment since installation does not involve significant changes toretention amount or the features or capabilities of the equipment or building complex interfaces and connections. In addition, the equipment could be installed by the customer or other vendors and generally the cost of installation approximates only 1% to 2% of the salesfair value of the related equipment.installation on systems that we recognize revenue at the time of shipment or delivery.

            For new products, new applications of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting customeragreed upon specifications at the customer site, revenue is deferred as deferred profit in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and fully recognized upon completion of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance. Since title

            Our systems are principally sold to goodsmanufacturers in the HB-LED, the data storage and solar industries. Sales arrangements for these systems generally passesinclude customer acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. Prior to shipment a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning within agreed upon shipment and 80%specifications. Such source inspection or test data replicates the acceptance testing that will be performed at the customer's site prior to 90%final acceptance of the system. Customer acceptance provisions include reassembly and installation of the system at the customer site, which includes performing functional or mechanical test procedures (i.e. hardware checks, leak testing, gas flow monitoring and quality control checks of the basic features of the product.) Additionally, a material demonstration process may be performed to validate the functionality of the product. Upon meeting the agreed upon specifications the customer approves final acceptance of the product.

            Veeco generally is required to install these products and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer's facility. Such installations typically are not considered complex and the installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment because it does not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complex interfaces or connections. We have a demonstrated history of completing such installations in a timely, consistent manner and can reliably estimate the costs of such. In such cases, the test environment at our facilities prior to shipment replicates the customer's environment. While there are others in the industry with sufficient knowledge about the installation process for our systems as a practical matter, most customers engage the Company to perform the installation services.

            In Japan, where our contractual terms with customers generally specify risk of loss and title transfers upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon receipt of written customer acceptance.

            Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract amount becomes payable at that time, inventoryterm. Component and spare part revenue is relieved and accounts receivable is recorded for the amount billedrecognized at the time of shipment. The profit onshipment or delivery in accordance with the amount billed for these transactions is deferredterms of the applicable sales arrangement.

            Short-Term Investments:    We determine the appropriate balance sheet classification of our investments at the time of purchase and recordedevaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as deferred profitavailable-for-sale. These securities include FDIC insured corporate bonds, treasury bills, commercial



    paper and CDARS with maturities of greater than three months when purchased in principal amounts that, when aggregated with interest to accrue over the term, will not exceed FDIC limits. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2007determination of comprehensive income (loss) and 2006, $3.3 millionreported in equity. Net realized gains and $0.3 million, respectively,losses are recorded in deferred profit. Service and maintenance contract revenues are recorded as deferred revenue, which is included in other accrued expenses, and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the service period of the related contract.net income (loss) attributable to Veeco.

            Inventory Valuation:    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts.parts and other service inventory. Obsolete or slow-moving inventory, based upon historical usage, or inventory in excess of management's estimated usage for the next 12 month's requirements is written-down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management's estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of excess inventory.

            Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment:    We have significantThe Company does not amortize goodwill or intangible assets relatedwith indefinite useful lives, but instead tests the balances in these asset accounts for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Our policy is to goodwill and other acquired intangibles. In assessingperform this annual impairment test in the recoverabilityfourth quarter of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If it is determined thateach fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators are present and that the assets will not be fully recoverable, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value.arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historica historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets

            Pursuant to relevant accounting pronouncements we are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Changes in strategy and/or market conditions could significantly impact these assumptions, and thus we may be required to record impairment charges for those assets not previously recorded. During the fourth quarter of 2007, 2006, and 2005, as required, we performed an annual impairment test, and based upon the judgment of management, it was determined that no impairment exists.

            Long-Lived Asset Impairment:    The carrying values of long-lived assets are periodically reviewed to determine if any impairment indicators are present. If it is determinedappropriate to use the operating segment as defined under accounting guidance as the reporting unit or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified two reporting units that such indicators are presentrequired to be reviewed for impairment. The reporting units are LED & Solar and Data Storage. In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

            We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to the Company's adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

            If the carrying value of the reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

            Definite-Lived Intangible and Long-Lived Assets:    Intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of the core proprietary manufacturing



    technologies associated with the products and offerings obtained through acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks and covenants not-to-compete are initially recorded at fair value and software licenses and deferred financing costs are initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the review indicatesstraight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods ranging from 2 years to 17 years.

            Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

            Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets willcarrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization or depreciation period, the carrying values of such assets are reduced to estimated fair value.recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historica historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there isare identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Assumptions utilizedRecoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by managementa comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

            Fair Value Measurements:    Accounting guidance for our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities requires that we disclose the type of inputs we use to value our assets and liabilities, based on three categories of inputs as defined in reviewingsuch. Level 1 inputs are quoted, unadjusted prices in active markets for impairment ofidentical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. These requirements apply to our long-lived assets, could be effected by changes in strategy and/orgoodwill and intangible assets. We use Level 3 inputs to value all of such assets and the methodology we use to value such assets has not changed since December 31, 2009. The Company primarily applies the market conditions which may require us to record additional impairment chargesapproach for these assets, as well as impairment charges on other long-lived assets not previously recorded.

            In the fourth quarter of 2007, management initiated a plan to discontinue certain product lines that were not consistent with the current view of the business. We identified and wrote off certain fixed assets associated with these product lines, recording an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million in 2007. No asset impairment charges were recorded during 2006 and 2005.recurring fair value measurements.

            Warranty Costs:    We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. As our customer engineers and process support engineers are highly trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and availability of critical replacement parts is another significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

            Income Taxes:    As part of the process of preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net



    deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards,carry forwards, and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

            We record valuation allowances in order to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under SFAS No. 109,the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

            At December 31, 2007, we had a valuation allowance of approximately $73.3 million against substantially all of our domestic net deferred tax assets, which consist of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, as well as temporary deductible differences. The valuation allowance of $73.3 million at December 31, 2007, increased by approximately $11.4 million during 2007, principally due to timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory and additional tax credit carry forwards which were partially offset by a $5.9 million decrease in the valuation allowance relating to unrecognized tax benefits established under Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")



    Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. If we are able to realize part or all of the domestic deferred tax assets in future periods, we will reduce our provision for income taxes with a release of the valuation allowance in an amount that corresponds with the income tax liability generated. The valuation allowance of $67.8 million at December 31, 2006 decreased by approximately $2.2 million during 2006, principally due to the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards.

            In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN 48"), which became effective for us on January 1, 2007. FIN 48Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48,such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. We are required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time and changes in assumptions and judgments can materially affect the amounts recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The impact of our reassessment of our tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 during the first quarter of 2007 resulted in a $0.8 million increase to the January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit balance. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, we had approximately $2.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including the cumulative effect increase to our reserve for uncertain tax positions. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we released approximately $0.4 million of the reserve related to foreign unrecognized tax benefits. As a result, we had $1.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007, all of which relate to positions taken on our foreign tax returns and represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate in future periods. At January 1, 2007, we reduced our deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance by $5.9 million related to unrecognized tax benefits established under FIN 48. During 2007 we reestablished $0.7 million of such amount.

            Share-BasedEquity-based Compensation:    In 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, supersedes APB No. 25, and amends SFAS No. 95,Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted using the modified prospective method of application, which requires the recognition of compensation expense on a prospective basis. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based awards, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining service period of awards that had been included in the pro forma disclosures in periods reported prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognizedEquity-based compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under previous accounting literature, which hasis measured at the effect of reducing consolidated net operating cash flows and increasing consolidated net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we did not recognize any consolidated financing cash flows for such excess tax deductions.

            Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to recordgrant date, based on the fair value of stock-based compensation awardsthe award and is recognized as an expense.expense over the employee requisite service period. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to



    risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and option life,life.

            The risk-free interest rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company's historical and future expectation of dividend yield.payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates. Since the fourth quarter of 2005, we have used

            We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical volatility, calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and implied volatilitiesvolatility, utilizing market data of the underlyingactively traded options on our common stock, which isare obtained from public data sources. Prior toWe believe that time, we based this assumption solely onthe historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

            The expected term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

    We estimate forfeitures using our historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

            With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises in determining the expected weighted-average option life. As of December 31, 2007, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards and option awards is $10.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 2.4 years both for the nonvested stock awards and for option awards.exercises.


    Recent Accounting Pronouncements

            Recent Accounting Pronouncements:Business Combinations:    In September 2006,December 2010, the FASB issued Statementamended guidance related to Business Combinations. The amendments affect any public entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requiring usethe combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal yearsthe beginning after November 15, 2007. Currently we believeof the impact in 2008 will be on our disclosurescomparable prior annual reporting period only. The adoptionamendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of this statement is not expectedthe nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

            On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 ("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-2 amends SFAS 157 to delay the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair valuebusiness combination included in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, FSP 157-2 defers thereported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.

            In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,The Fair Value Optionprospectively for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for those that are specifically scoped out of the Statement) at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

            In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS 160"). Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date at fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) also changes the accounting treatment for certain other items that relate to business combinations. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will assess the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements if and when an acquisition occurs.

            Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:    In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. The amendments modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

            Subsequent Events:    The FASB has issued amended guidance for subsequent events. The amendment removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC's literature. All of the amendments were effective upon issuance (February 24, 2010). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

            Fair Value Measurements:    In January 1, 2009.2010, the FASB issued amended guidance for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This update requires some new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. The purpose of SFAS 160FASB's objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the relevance, comparability, and transparency of thein financial informationreporting. Specifically, this update requires that a reporting entity providesdisclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in itsand out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, this update clarifies the requirements of existing disclosures. For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the



    valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update was adopted on January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The most significant provisions of this statement result in changes to the presentation of noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 isThose disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

            Revenue Recognition:    In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to multiple-element arrangements which requires an entity to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of an arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This update eliminates the use of the residual method of allocation and requires the relative-selling-price method in all circumstances. All entities must adopt the guidance no later than the beginning of their first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Entities may elect to adopt the guidance through either prospective application for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified, after the effective date or through retrospective application to all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

            In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance that is expected to significantly affect how entities account for revenue arrangements that contain both hardware and software elements. As a result, many tangible products that rely on software will be accounted for under the revised multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance, rather than the software revenue recognition guidance. The revised guidance must be adopted by all entities no later than fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. An entity must select the same transition method and same period for the adoption of both this statementguidance and the revisions to the multiple-element arrangements guidance noted above. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact the manner in which we present noncontrolling interests, but will not impact ouron its consolidated financial position or results of operations.statements.



    Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

    Market Risk

            The principal market risks (such as the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices) to which we are exposed are:

      rates on debt, and

      rates on short-term and long-term investment portfolios, and

      exchange rates, generating translation and transaction gains and losses.

    Interest Rates

            We centrally manage our debt and investment portfolios considering investment opportunities and risks,risk, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. Our investment portfoliosportfolio includes fixed-income securities with a fair value of approximately $394.2 million at December 31, 20072010. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. Based on our investment portfolio at December 31, 2006, respectively, consist of cash equivalents. Assuming year-end 2007 variable debt and investment levels, a one-point change2010, an immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates wouldmay result in a significant decrease in the fair value of the portfolio. While an increase in interest rates may reduce the fair value of the investment portfolio, we will not realize the losses in the consolidated statement of operations unless the individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or the loss is determined to be other-than-temporary. Our debt portfolio consists of fixed rate and fixed maturity instruments therefore any changes in interest rates will not have a materialan impact on net interest expense. In December 2001 and January 2002, we issued an aggregate of $220.0 million of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes. During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of our notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of our notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the original convertible subordinated notes to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the original notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregate principal amount of new notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of the original notes remained outstanding. The remaining original notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $38.51 per share. We pay interest on these notes on June 21 and December 21 of each year. The notes will mature on December 21, 2008. The notes are redeemable at our option, at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture. The new notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007. We pay interest on these notes on April 20 and October 15 of each year. The notes will mature on April 15, 2012.


    Foreign Operations

            Operating in international markets involves exposure to movements in currency exchange rates, which are volatile at times. The economic impact of currency exchange rate movements on Veeco is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. These changes, if material, could cause us to adjust our financing and operating strategies. Consequently, isolating the effect of changes in currency does not incorporate these other important economic factors.

            Our net sales to foreign customers represented approximately 68%90%, 79% and 59% of our total net sales in 20072010, 2009 and 67% in both 2006 and 2005.2008, respectively. We expect that net sales to foreign customers will continue to represent a large percentage of our total net sales. Our net sales denominated in foreign currencies represented approximately 20%2%, 16%,6% and 20%5% of total net sales in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. The aggregate foreign currency exchange lossgain (loss) included in determining consolidated results of operations was approximately $0.5$1.3 million, $0.3$(0.7) million and $0.5$(0.1) million in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. Included in the aggregate foreign currency exchange lossgain (loss) were gains (losses) gains relating to forward contracts of $(0.1)$0.1 million, ($0.2)$0.2 million and $0.2($0.4) million in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. These amounts were recognized and included in other expense (income) expense,, net. As of December 31, 2007,2010, approximately $0.1 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in



    prepaid expenses and other current assets and cash in an amount equivalent to such gains was received in January 2008. As of December 31, 2006, approximately $0.1$0.3 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and cash in an amount equivalent to such gains wasthese amounts were subsequently received in January 2007. On2011. As of December 27, 2007, we entered into two31, 2009, approximately $0.2 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and these amounts were subsequently received in January 2010. Monthly forward contracts for a notional amount of $18.5 million for the month of January 2008 for the total notional amount of $7.0 million. The fair values of the contracts at inception2011 were zero, which did not significantly change atentered into in December 31, 2007.2010. We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we use derivative financial instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We enter into monthly forward contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known currency exposures. The average notional amount of such contracts outstanding was approximately $2.6$6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.2010. The changes in currency exchange rates that have the largest impact on translating our international operating profit (loss) profit are the Japanese Yen, the British Pound and the Euro. We believe that based upon our hedging program, a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would have an immaterial impact on the consolidated results of operations. We believe that this quantitative measure has inherent limitations because, as discussed in the first paragraph of this section, it does not take into account any governmental actions or changes in either customer purchasing patterns or our financing and operating strategies.

    Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

            We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

    Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

            Our Consolidated Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule filed as part of this Form 10-K.

    Quarterly Results of Operations

            The following table presents selected unaudited financial data for each quarter of fiscal 20072010 and 2006.2009. Consistent with prior years, we report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 20072010 interim quarter ends were April 1, July 1,March 28, June 27 and September 30.26. The 20062009 interim quarter ends were April 2, July 2,March 29, June 28 and October 1.September 27. For ease of reference, we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30 and September 30 in our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.


            Although unaudited, this information has been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and, in the opinion of our management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of this information in accordance with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States. Such quarterly



    results are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations and should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

     
     Fiscal 2007
     Fiscal 2006
     
     Q1
     Q2
     Q3
     Q4
     Year
     Q1
     Q2
     Q3
     Q4
     Year
     
     (in thousands, except per share data)

     (in thousands, except per share data)

    Net sales $99,166 $98,769 $97,718 $106,822 $402,475 $93,918 $111,635 $112,369 $123,112 $441,034
    Gross profit  43,695  42,245  35,894  35,677  157,511  41,769  49,712  47,856  54,787  194,124
    Net income (loss)  293  (2,595) (5,683) (9,374) (17,359)$(242)$3,025 $4,508 $7,626 $14,917
    Net income (loss) per common share $0.01 $(0.08)$(0.18)$(0.30)$(0.56)$(0.01)$0.10 $0.15 $0.25 $0.49
    Diluted net income (loss) per common share $0.01 $(0.08)$(0.18)$(0.30)$(0.56)$(0.01)$0.10 $0.14 $0.24 $0.48
    Weighted average shares outstanding  30,899  30,926  31,100  31,128  31,020  30,081  30,322  30,693  30,859  30,492
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  31,281  30,926  31,100  31,128  31,020  30,081  31,254  31,393  31,185  31,059

     
     Fiscal 2010 Fiscal 2009 
     
     Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 
     
     (in thousands, except per share data)
     

    Net sales

     $134,750 $221,389 $277,094 $299,998 $933,231 $39,107 $49,475 $74,688 $119,142 $282,412 

    Gross profit

      56,740  98,801  135,482  152,802  443,825  10,909  16,248  30,547  53,531  111,235 

    Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes

      22,824  49,931  91,104  96,672  260,531  (17,661) (12,577) 31  15,978  (14,229)

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

      3,220  2,462  (4,941) 100,488  101,229  (3,283) (2,126) 1,239  2,767  (1,403)

    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

                (42) (23)     (65)
                          

    Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

     $26,044 $52,393 $86,163 $197,160 $361,760 $(20,902)$(14,680)$1,270 $18,745 $(15,567)
                          

    Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

                                   

    Basic:

                                   
     

    Continuing operations

     $0.59 $1.26 $2.28 $2.45 $6.60 $(0.56)$(0.40)$ $0.45 $(0.44)
     

    Discontinued operations

      0.08  0.06  (0.12) 2.55  2.56  (0.10) (0.07) 0.04  0.08  (0.04)
                          
     

    Income (loss)

     $0.67 $1.32 $2.16 $5.00 $9.16 $(0.66)$(0.47)$0.04 $0.53 $(0.48)
                          

    Diluted :

                                   
     

    Continuing operations

     $0.54 $1.15 $2.16 $2.30 $6.13 $(0.56)$(0.40)$ $0.42 $(0.44)
     

    Discontinued operations

      0.08  0.05  (0.12) 2.40  2.38  (0.10) (0.07) 0.04  0.08  (0.04)
                          
     

    Income (loss)

     $0.62 $1.20 $2.04 $4.70 $8.51 $(0.66)$(0.47)$0.04 $0.50 $(0.48)
                          

    Weighted average shares outstanding:

                                   
     

    Basic

      38,784  39,761  39,946  39,453  39,499  31,515  31,497  31,608  35,623  32,628 
     

    Diluted

      42,269  43,506  42,258  41,972  42,514  31,515  31,497  32,375  37,742  32,628 

            On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology's operating results are accounted for as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated results of operations. The sales transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. As part of our agreement with Bruker, $22.9 million of proceeds is held in escrow and is restricted from use for one year from the closing date of the transaction to secure certain specified losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we made in the stock purchase agreement and related documents. As part of the sale we incurred transaction costs, which consisted of investment bank fees and legal fees, totaling $5.2 million. During the firstfourth quarter of 2006,2010, we recordedrecognized a pre-tax gain on extinguishmentdisposal of debt$156.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain of $0.3$5.4 million resulting fromrelated to the repurchase of $20.0 million of our 4.125% convertible subordinated notes.

            During the third quarter of 2006, we wrote off $1.2 million of in-process research and development associated with the purchase of 19.9% of the common stock of Fluens (see Item 7). Of this amount, 80.1% was eliminated as noncontrolling interest.assets in China.

            During the first quarter of 2007,2010, we recordedrecognized a gain on extinguishmentrestructuring credit of debt of $0.7$0.2 million resulting from the repurchase of $56.0 million of our of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes.associated with a change in estimate.


            During the secondfirst quarter of 2007, in conjunction with a cost reduction plan,2009, we recognized a restructuring charge of $2.3 million, primarily for personnel severance. During the second quarter of 2009, we recognized an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1.5 million.$1.7 million primarily for lease-related and personnel severance costs and an asset impairment charge of $0.3 million for property and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage segment. During the third quarter of 2007,2009, we recognized an additional restructuring charge of $0.5$0.8 million, related to this plan.

    primarily for personnel severance costs. During the fourth quarter of 2007,2009, we recognized an additional restructuring expense of $4.7 million, as well as an asset impairment charge of $1.1$0.1 million and an inventory write-off of $4.8 million.related to personnel severance costs.

            A variety of factors influence the level of our net sales in a particular quarter including economic conditions in the semiconductor,HB LED, solar, data storage and HB-LED/wirelesssemiconductor industries, the timing of significant orders, shipment delays, specific feature requests by customers, the introduction of new products by us and our competitors, production and quality problems, changes in material costs, disruption in sources of supply, seasonal patterns of capital spending by customers, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the sale of products which have an average selling price in excess of $750,000.$2,000,000. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue from a single transaction could have a significant impact on our net sales and operating results in any given quarter.

    Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

            None.

    Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

    Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

            Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the



    reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls, and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

            We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to materialensure that information required to be includeddisclosed by us in our periodicreports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission filings.rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

            Subsequent to that evaluation there have been no significant changes in our disclosure controls or procedures or other factors that could significantly affect these controls or procedures after such evaluation.


    Design and Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

            Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have included a report of management's assessment of the design and effectiveness of its internal controls as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.2010. Our independent registered public accounting firm also attested to, and reported on, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management's report and the independent registered public accounting firm's attestation report are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 20072010 under the caption entitled "Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" and "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting."

    Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

            We are presently in the final stages of implementing a new company-wide integrated applications software and, as of December 31, 2007, have completed the conversion to this new platform in approximately 95% of our businesses, with conversion remaining in one location, which is expected to be completed in the first half of 2008. As a result, certain changes have been made to our internal controls, which management believes will strengthen our internal control structure. There have been no other significant changes in our internal controls or other factors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 that could significantlyhave materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls after such evaluation.our internal control over financial reporting.

    Item 9B.    Other Information

            None.



    PART III

            Portions of the information required by Part III of Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from Veeco's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with Veeco's 20082011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement").

    Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

            The information required by Item 10 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Corporate Governance," "Executive Officers" and "Section 16(a) Reporting Compliance."

            We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers (the "Code") which applies to our chief executive officer, president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code can be found on our website (www.veeco.com). We intend to disclose on our website the nature of any future amendments to and waivers of the Code that apply to the chief executive officer, president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct which applies to all of our employees, including those listed above, as well as to our directors. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct can be found on our website (www.veeco.com). The website address above is intended to be an inactive, textual reference only. None of the material on this website is part of this report.

    Item 11.    Executive Compensation

            The information required by Item 11 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Executive Compensation."

    Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

            The information required by Item 12 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information."

            The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007.2010. See Note 58 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for information regarding the material features of these plans.

     
     Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
    (a)

     Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
    (b)

     Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
    (c)

    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 5,315,743(1)$22.94 1,879,493
    Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 355,823(2)$24.51 
      
        
    Total 5,671,566    1,879,493
      
        

     
     Number of securities to
    be issued upon exercise of
    outstanding options,
    warrants, and rights
    (a)
     Weighted average
    exercise price of
    outstanding options,
    warrants, and rights
    (b)
     Number of securities
    remaining available for
    future issuance under
    equity compensation
    plans (excluding
    securities reflected in
    column (a))
    (c)
     

    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

      2,560,354 $19.62  2,623,776 

    Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

      9,272(1)$43.19   
             

    Total

      2,569,626     2,623,776 
             

    (1)
    Includes 6,105 stock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of CVC, Inc. on May 10, 2000, which merger was approved by stockholders.

    (2)
    Includes 170,668 stockStock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of Applied Epi, Inc. on September 17, 2001.

    Item 13.    Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence

            The information required by Item 13 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Independence of the Board of Directors" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

    Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

            The information required by Item 14 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Proposal 2—Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP."



    PART IV

    Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

    (a)
    The Registrant's financial statements together with a separate table of contents are annexed hereto. The financial statement schedule is listed in the separate table of contents annexed hereto.

    (b)
    Exhibits

            Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

    Number

     Exhibit
     Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    3.12.1 Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 15, 2010 among Veeco Instruments Inc. (Veeco), Veeco Metrology Inc. and Bruker CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Exhibit 2.1

    3.1


    Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the CompanyVeeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 3.1

    3.2

     

    Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998.

     

    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 3.2

    3.3

     

    Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.1

    3.4

     

    Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, Exhibit 3.1

    3.5

     
    Third
    Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Exhibit 3.1

    3.6


    Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010


    Filed herewith

    3.7


    Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company,Veeco, effective October 26, 2000.23, 2008

     
    Registration Statement
    Current Report on Form S-8 (File8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1

    3.8


    Amendment No. 333-49476),1 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective May 20, 2010


    Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 7, 2000,May 26, 2010, Exhibit 4.33.1

    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Rights Agent, including the form of the Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights setting forth the terms of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Exhibit A, the form of Rights Certificates as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C. Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated March 15, 2001, Exhibit 1

    4.2

     

    Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent.

     

    Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 21, 2001, Exhibit 4.1

    4.3

     

    Amendment No 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2002, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent.

     

    Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002, Exhibit 4.1

    4.4Indenture between Veeco and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, dated December 21, 2001, relating to the 41/8% convertible subordinated notes due 2008.Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-84252), filed March 13, 2002, Exhibit 4.1
    4.5
    4.4

     
    Form of Note/Indenture relating to Debt Securities which may be offered on a delayed or continuous basis.Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128004), filed September 28, 2005, Exhibit 4.1
    4.6
    Indenture, dated April 16, 2007, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank National Trust

     

    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 To Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128004) filed April 16, 2007, Exhibit 4.1
    4.7
    4.5

     

    First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 20, 2007, by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee

     

    Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 20, 2007, Exhibit 4.1

    10.1

     
    Credit Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2007, by and among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
    10.2First Amendment dated as of February 25, 2008 to the Credit Agreement dated August 20, 2007 among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Filed herewith
    10.3Amendment and Reaffirmation dated August 20, 2007 of Security Agreement dated as of March 15, 2005 among Veeco Instruments Inc., the subsidiaries of Veeco named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.2
    10.4
    Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.2
    10.5
    10.2

     

    Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002).

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.2
    10.6
    10.3

     

    Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.3


    10.7
    10.4

    *

    Form of ExchangeIndemnification Agreement dated April 16, 2007 relating to the exchangeentered into between Veeco and each of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 21, 2008 for 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due April 15, 2012its directors and executive officers.

     

    Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 20, 2007,on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
    10.8*
    10.5

    *

    Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-93958), Exhibit 10.20
    10.9*
    10.6

    *

    Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.1

    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    10.1010.7*Amendment dated July 25, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.2
    10.11
    10.8

    *

    Amendment dated May 29, 1998 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.1
    10.12
    10.9

    *

    Amendment dated May 14, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.2
    10.13
    10.10

    *

    Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.
    Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-85184), Exhibit 10.17
    10.14*Amendment dated May 15, 1996 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08981) filed July 26, 1996, Exhibit 10.2
    10.15*Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.3
    10.16*Amendment dated May 21, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.3
    10.17*Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006.
     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.4
    10.18
    10.11

    *

    Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
    10.19
    10.12

    *

    Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.


    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.41

    10.13

    *

    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3
    10.20
    10.14

    *
    Form of Directors Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2

    10.21*
    Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3
    10.22
    10.15

    *

    Veeco Instruments Inc. 20002010 Stock OptionIncentive Plan, for Non-Officer Employees.effective May 14, 2010

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-49476)333-166852) filed November 7, 2000,May 14, 2010, Exhibit 4.410.1
    10.23
    10.16

    *
    Amendment No. 1 to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000
    Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees, effective dated July 26, 2001.Agreement

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-66574)333-166852) filed August 2, 2001,May 14, 2010, Exhibit 4.210.2
    10.24
    10.17

    *
    Veeco Instruments Inc. 2006 Long-Term Cash
    Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement

     

    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-166852) filed May 14, 2010, Exhibit 10.3

    10.18

    *

    Veeco Performance-Based Restricted Stock 2010


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,2010, Exhibit 10.110.2
    10.25
    10.19

    *
    Employment agreement
    Veeco 2010 Management Bonus Plan dated January 22, 2010


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.2

    10.20

    *

    Veeco 2010 Special Profit Sharing Plan dated February 15, 2010


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.3

    10.21

    *

    Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of April 27, 2007September 12, 2008


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3

    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    10.22*Amendment No. 1 dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Senior Executive Change in Control PolicyAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.37

    10.23

    *

    Service Agreement effective July 24, 2008 between Veeco and Edward H. Braun and Veeco Instruments Inc.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007,2008, Exhibit 10.210.1
    10.26
    10.24

    *

    Employment agreementAgreement effective as of July 1, 2007 between Veeco and John R. Peeler and Veeco Instruments Inc.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.3
    10.27
    10.25

    *

    Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler


    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.38

    10.26

    *

    Second Amendment effective June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

    10.27

    *

    Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2009 (effective January 18, 2010) between Veeco and David D. Glass


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

    10.28

    *

    Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.


    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38

    10.29

    *

    Form of Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan and Robert P. Oates


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

    10.30

    *

    Form of Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan, Mark R. Munch and Robert P. Oates


    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.40

    10.31

    *

    Letter agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Exhibit 10.2

    10.32

    *

    Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco and Robert P. Oates


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.1

    10.33

    *

    Amendment dated September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and Robert P. Oates


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.2

    10.34

    *

    Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2003 between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr. and Veeco Instruments Inc.

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, Exhibit 10.5
    10.28
    10.35

    *

    Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Employment Agreement ofbetween Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr., effective June 9, 2006

     

    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
    10.29
    10.36

    *

    Amendment dated as of September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1

    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    10.37*LetterAmendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between the CompanyVeeco and John P. Kiernan.F. Rein, Jr. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,2008, Exhibit 10.3810.39
    10.30
    10.38

    *

    Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005January 11, 2008 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Robert P. OatesMark R. Munch

     

    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.33

    10.39

    *

    Letter Agreement dated September 23, 2010 between Veeco and Mark R. Munch


    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005,2010, Exhibit 10.1
    10.31
    21.1
    *
    Form of Amendment to Letter Agreements of John P. Kiernan and Robert P. Oates effective June 9, 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3
    10.32*Letter Agreement dated October 15, 2007 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and William A. TomeoFiled herewith
    10.33*Letter Agreement dated January 11, 2008 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Mark R. MunchFiled herewith
    10.34*Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco Instruments Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
    21.1
    Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

     

    Filed herewith

    23.1

     

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

     

    Filed herewith



    31.1

     

    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

     

    Filed herewith

    31.2

     

    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

     

    Filed herewith

    32.1

     

    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     

    Filed herewith

    32.2

     

    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     

    Filed herewith

    *
    Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a) (3) of Form 10-K.


    SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 26, 2008.23, 2011.

      VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

     

     

    By:



    /s/ 
    JOHN R. PEELER

    John R. Peeler
    Chief Executive Officer

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, on February 26, 2008.23, 2011.

    Signature
     
    Title

     

     

     
    /s/ EDWARD H. BRAUN

    Edward H. Braun
     Director and Chairman


    /s/ 
    RICHARD A. D'AMORE

    Richard A. D'Amore

     

    Director


    /s/ 
    JOEL A. ELFTMANN

    Joel A. Elftmann

     

    Director


    /s/ 
    HEINZ K. FRIDRICH      THOMAS GUTIERREZ

    Heinz K. FridrichThomas Gutierrez

     

    Director


    /s/ 
    DOUGLAS A. KINGSLEY      GORDON HUNTER

    Douglas A. KingsleyGordon Hunter

     

    Director


    /s/ 
    PAUL R. LOW      
    Paul R. Low


    Director

    /s/  
    ROGER D. MCDANIEL

    Roger D. McDaniel

     

    Director


    /s/ 
    JOHN R. PEELER

    John R. Peeler

     

    Director and Chief Executive Officer
    (principal executive officer)


    /s/ 
    IRWIN H. PFISTER      
    Irwin H. Pfister


    Director



    /s/  
    PETER J. SIMONE

    Peter J. Simone

     

    Director


    /s/ 
    JOHN F. REIN, JR.      DAVID D. GLASS

    John F. Rein, Jr.David D. Glass

     

    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (principal
    (principal financial officer)


    /s/ 
    JOHN P. KIERNAN

    John P. Kiernan

     

    Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller (principal
    (principal accounting officer)

    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

    and Financial Statement Schedule

     
     Page

    Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     F-2

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     F-3

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements

     F-4

    Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20072010 and 20062009

     F-5

    Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008

     F-6

    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

    F-7

    Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008

     F-7F-8

    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008

     F-8F-9

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     F-9F-10

    Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

     S-1

    Table of Contents


    MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNALManagement's Report on Internal Control
    CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTINGOver Financial Reporting

            Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

      pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions in and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

      provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recognizedrecorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

      provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

            Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework.

            Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.2010.

            The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears under the heading "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting."

    Veeco Instruments Inc.
    Woodbury,Plainview, NY
    February 26, 200823, 2011

    /s/ JOHN R. PEELER

    John R. Peeler
    Chief Executive Officer
    Veeco Instruments Inc.
    February 26, 200823, 2011
      


    /s/ 
    JOHN F. REIN, JR.      DAVID D. GLASS

    John F. Rein, Jr.David D. Glass
    Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
    Veeco Instruments Inc.
    February 26, 200823, 2011

     

     

    Table of Contents


    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

    The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Veeco Instruments Inc.

            We have audited Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries'Subsidiaries (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

            We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

            Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, based on the COSO criteria.

            We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 20072010 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated February 26, 200823, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  

    New York, New York
    February 26, 200823, 2011


    Table of Contents


    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    on Financial Statements

    To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Veeco Instruments Inc.

            We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule in the accompanying Index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

            We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007,2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

            As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," effective January 1, 2006.

    We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2008,23, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.



      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  

    New York, New York
    February 26, 200823, 2011


    Table of Contents



    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Consolidated Balance Sheets

    (Dollars in thousands)

     
     December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     
    Assets       
    Current assets:       
     Cash and cash equivalents $117,083 $147,046 
     Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $984 in 2007 and $2,683 in 2006  75,207  86,589 
     Inventories  98,594  100,355 
     Prepaid expenses and other current assets  8,901  9,378 
     Deferred income taxes  2,649  2,565 
      
     
     
    Total current assets  302,434  345,933 
    Property, plant, and equipment at cost, net  66,142  73,510 
    Goodwill  100,898  100,898 
    Purchased technology, less accumulated amortization of $72,481 in 2007 and $64,736 in 2006  36,107  43,852 
    Other intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $29,886 in 2007 and $26,740 in 2006  23,540  25,053 
    Other assets  213  354 
      
     
     
    Total assets $529,334 $589,600 
      
     
     
    Liabilities and shareholders' equity       
    Current liabilities:       
     Accounts payable $36,639 $40,588 
     Accrued expenses  60,201  48,714 
     Deferred profit  3,250  251 
     Income taxes payable  2,278  2,723 
     Current portion of long-term debt  25,550  5,597 
      
     
     
    Total current liabilities  127,918  97,873 
    Deferred income taxes  3,712  2,423 
    Long-term debt  121,035  203,607 
    Other non-current liabilities  1,978  2,304 
    Noncontrolling interest  1,014  1,642 
    Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)       
    Shareholders' equity:       
    Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding     
    Common stock, 60,000,000 shares authorized; 31,823,890 and 31,118,622 shares issued and outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively  312  309 
    Additional paid-in-capital  399,795  391,376 
    Accumulated deficit  (131,715) (113,528)
    Accumulated other comprehensive income  5,285  3,594 
      
     
     
    Total shareholders' equity  273,677  281,751 
      
     
     
    Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $529,334 $589,600 
      
     
     

    See

     
     December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Assets

           

    Current assets:

           
     

    Cash and cash equivalents

     $245,132 $148,500 
     

    Short-term investments

      394,180  135,000 
     

    Restricted cash

      76,115   
     

    Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $512 in 2010 and $438 in 2009

      150,528  67,546 
     

    Inventories

      108,487  55,807 
     

    Prepaid expenses and other current assets

      34,328  6,419 
     

    Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

        40,058 
     

    Deferred income taxes

      13,803  3,105 
          

    Total current assets

      1,022,573  456,435 

    Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

      42,320  44,707 

    Goodwill

      52,003  52,003 

    Deferred income taxes

      9,403   

    Intangible assets, net

      16,893  21,770 

    Other assets

      4,842  429 

    Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

        30,028 
          

    Total assets

     $1,148,034 $605,372 
          

    Liabilities and equity

           

    Current liabilities:

           
     

    Accounts payable

     $32,220 $24,910 
     

    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

      183,010  99,823 
     

    Deferred profit

      4,109  2,520 
     

    Income taxes payable

      56,369  829 
     

    Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

      5,359  10,824 
     

    Current portion of long-term debt

      101,367  212 
          

    Total current liabilities

      382,434  139,118 

    Deferred income taxes

        5,039 

    Long-term debt

      2,654  100,964 

    Other liabilities

      434  1,192 

    Equity:

           
     

    Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

         
     

    Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized 120,000,000 shares; 40,337,950 and 39,003,114 shares issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively

      409  382 
     

    Additional paid-in-capital

      656,969  575,860 
     

    Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

      137,436  (224,324)
     

    Accumulated other comprehensive income

      5,796  7,141 
     

    Less: treasury stock, at cost; 1,118,600 shares in 2010

      (38,098)  
          

    Total equity

      762,512  359,059 
          

    Total liabilities and equity

     $1,148,034 $605,372 
          

    The accompanying notes.notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


    Table of Contents



    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Consolidated Statements of Operations

    (In thousands, except per share data)

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Net sales $402,475 $441,034 $410,190 
    Cost of sales  244,964  246,910  236,090 
      
     
     
     
    Gross profit  157,511  194,124  174,100 
    Operating expenses:          
     Selling, general, and administrative expense  90,972  93,110  84,667 
     Research and development expense  61,174  61,925  60,382 
     Amortization expense  10,250  16,045  16,583 
     Restructuring expense  6,726    1,165 
     Asset impairment charge  1,068     
     Write-off of purchased in-process technology    1,160   
     Other (income) expense, net  (618) (572) 237 
      
     
     
     
    Total operating expenses  169,572  171,668  163,034 
      
     
     
     
    Operating (loss) income  (12,061) 22,456  11,066 
    Interest expense  6,976  9,194  10,203 
    Interest income  (3,963) (4,926) (2,635)
    Gain on extinguishment of debt  (738) (330)  
      
     
     
     
    (Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest  (14,336) 18,518  3,498 
    Income tax provision  3,651  4,959  4,395 
    Noncontrolling interest  (628) (1,358)  
      
     
     
     
    Net (loss) income $(17,359)$14,917 $(897)
      
     
     
     
    (Loss) income per common share:          
    Net (loss) income per common share $(0.56)$0.49 $(0.03)
      
     
     
     
    Diluted net (loss) income per common share $(0.56)$0.48 $(0.03)
      
     
     
     
    Weighted average shares outstanding  31,020  30,492  29,921 
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  31,020  31,059  29,921 

    See

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Net sales

     $933,231 $282,412 $314,935 

    Cost of sales

      489,406  171,177  191,664 
            

    Gross profit

      443,825  111,235  123,271 

    Operating expenses (income):

              
     

    Selling, general and administrative

      91,777  62,151  60,542 
     

    Research and development

      71,390  43,483  39,608 
     

    Amortization

      4,876  5,168  8,864 
     

    Restructuring

      (179) 4,837  9,424 
     

    Asset impairment

        304  51,387 
     

    Other, net

      (1,614) 24  (414)
            

    Total operating expenses

      166,250  115,967  169,411 
            

    Operating income (loss)

      277,575  (4,732) (46,140)

    Interest expense

      8,201  7,732  9,317 

    Interest income

      (1,629) (882) (2,588)

    Gain on extinguishment of debt

          (3,758)
            

    Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

      271,003  (11,582) (49,111)

    Income tax provision

      10,472  2,647  1,722 
            

    Income (loss) from continuing operations

      260,531  (14,229) (50,833)

    Discontinued operations:

              
     

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes (includes gain on disposal of $156,290 in 2010)

      155,455  (2,703) (24,418)
     

    Income tax provision (benefit)

      54,226  (1,300) 170 
            

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

      101,229  (1,403) (24,588)
            

    Net income (loss)

      361,760  (15,632) (75,421)

    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

        (65) (230)
            

    Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

     $361,760 $(15,567)$(75,191)
            

    Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

              

    Basic:

              
      

    Continuing operations

     $6.60 $(0.44)$(1.62)
      

    Discontinued operations

      2.56  (0.04) (0.78)
            
     

    Income (loss)

     $9.16 $(0.48)$(2.40)
            

    Diluted:

              
      

    Continuing operations

     $6.13 $(0.44)$(1.62)
      

    Discontinued operations

      2.38  (0.04) (0.78)
            
     

    Income (loss)

     $8.51 $(0.48)$(2.40)
            

    Weighted average shares outstanding:

              

    Basic

      39,499  32,628  31,347 

    Diluted

      42,514  32,628  31,347 

    The accompanying notes.notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


    Table of Contents



    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'Comprehensive Income (Loss)

    (In thousands)

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Net income (loss)

     $361,760 $(15,632)$(75,421)

    Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

              
     

    Foreign currency translation

      (1,322) (58) 1,845 
     

    Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

      97     
     

    Minimum pension liability

      (120) 32  37 
            

    Comprehensive income (loss)

      360,415  (15,658) (73,539)

    Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

        (65) (230)
            

    Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Veeco

     $360,415 $(15,593)$(73,309)
            

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Consolidated Statements of Equity

    (Dollars in thousands)

     
     Common Stock
      
      
      
      
      
     
     
     Additional Paid-In Capital
     Accumulated Deficit
     Accumulated Comprehensive Income
      
     Comprehensive (Loss) Income
     
     
     Shares
     Amount
     Total
     
    Balance at December 31, 2004 29,848,271 $298 $371,472 $(127,548)$8,130 $252,352    
    Exercise of stock options and stock issuances under stock purchase plan 166,911  2  2,131      2,133 $ 
    Stock-based compensation expense     99      99   
    Issuance of restricted stock 45,000    39      39   
    Translation adjustment         (5,119) (5,119) (5,119)
    Defined benefit pension plan, net of tax effect         (20) (20) (20)
    Net loss       (897)   (897) (897)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance at December 31, 2005 30,060,182  300  373,741  (128,445) 2,991  248,587 $(6,036)
                       
     
    Exercise of stock options and stock issuances under stock purchase plan 853,224  9  15,515      15,524 $ 
    Stock-based compensation expense     2,219      2,219   
    Issuance, vesting, and cancellation of restricted stock 205,216    (99)     (99)  
    Translation adjustment         644  644  644 
    Defined benefit pension plan, net of tax effect         (41) (41) (41)
    Net income       14,917    14,917  14,917 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance at December 31, 2006 31,118,622  309  391,376  (113,528) 3,594  281,751 $15,520 
                       
     
    Cumulative effect of accounting change due to adoption of FIN 48       (828)   (828)$ 
    Exercise of stock options and stock issuances under stock purchase plan 205,995  2  3,170      3,172   
    Stock-based compensation expense     5,620      5,620   
    Issuance, vesting, and cancellation of restricted stock 499,273  1  (371)     (370)  
    Translation adjustment         1,698  1,698  1,698 
    Defined benefit pension plan, net of tax effect         (7) (7) (7)
    Net loss       (17,359)   (17,359) (17,359)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance at December 31, 2007 31,823,890 $312 $399,795 $(131,715)$5,285 $273,677 $(15,668)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    See

     
      
      
      
      
      
      
     Equity Attributable to 
     
     Common Stock  
      
     Retained
    Earnings
    (Accumulated
    Deficit)
      
     
     
     Treasury
    Stock
     Additional
    Paid-in
    Capital
     Accumulated Other
    Comprehensive
    Income
      
     Noncontrolling
    Interest
      
     
     
     Shares Amount Veeco Total 

    Balance at January 1, 2008

      31,823,890 $312 $ $416,113 $(133,566)$5,285 $288,144 $1,014 $289,158 

    Exercise of stock options

      67,080  1    680      681    681 

    Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

            9,668      9,668    9,668 

    Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

            858      858    858 

    Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

      296,629  3    (1,019)     (1,016)   (1,016)

    Translation adjustments

                1,845  1,845    1,845 

    Defined benefit pension plan

                37  37    37 

    Net loss

              (75,191)   (75,191) (230) (75,421)
                        

    Balance at December 31, 2008

      32,187,599  316    426,300  (208,757) 7,167  225,026  784  225,810 

    Exercise of stock options

      755,229  8    12,578      12,586    12,586 

    Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

            7,547      7,547    7,547 

    Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

            990      990    990 

    Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

      310,286      (607)     (607)   (607)

    Issuance of common stock

      5,750,000  58    130,028      130,086    130,086 

    Translation adjustments

                (58) (58)   (58)

    Defined benefit pension plan

                32  32    32 

    Purchase of remaining 80.1% of noncontrolling interest

            (976)     (976) (719) (1,695)

    Net loss

              (15,567)   (15,567) (65) (15,632)
                        

    Balance at December 31, 2009

      39,003,114  382    575,860  (224,324) 7,141  359,059    359,059 

    Exercise of stock options

      2,499,591  25    45,139      45,164    45,164 

    Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

            9,648      9,648    9,648 

    Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

            7,672      7,672    7,672 

    Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

      (46,155) 2    (4,621)     (4,619)   (4,619)

    Treasury stock

      (1,118,600)   (38,098)       (38,098)   (38,098)

    Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

            23,271      23,271    23,271 

    Translation adjustments

                (1,322) (1,322)   (1,322)

    Defined benefit pension plan

                (120) (120)   (120)

    Unrealized gain on short-term investments

                97  97    97 

    Net income

              361,760    361,760    361,760 
                        

    Balance at December 31, 2010

      40,337,950 $409 $(38,098)$656,969 $137,436 $5,796 $762,512 $ $762,512 
                        

    The accompanying notes.notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


    Table of Contents



    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

    (In thousands)

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Operating activities          
    Net (loss) income $(17,359)$14,917 $(897)
    Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
     Depreciation and amortization  24,991  30,080  29,811 
     Deferred income taxes  1,332  1,370  929 
     Net (gain) loss on sale of fixed assets  (77) (18) 377 
     Net gain on early extinguishment of long-term debt  (738) (330)  
     Non-cash compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock  5,620  2,219  138 
     Noncontrolling interest  (628) (1,358)  
     Write-off of purchased in-process technology    1,160   
     Non-cash inventory write-off  4,821     
     Non-cash asset impairment charge  1,068     
     Provision for bad debt  (1,070) 322  (150)
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
      Accounts receivable  15,114  3,439  (8,687)
      Inventories  (1,331) (10,518) 20,741 
      Accounts payable  (4,049) 9,155  6,053 
      Accrued expenses, deferred profit, and other current liabilities  13,129  228  419 
      Other, net  (1,638) (4,651) (3,824)
      
     
     
     
    Net cash provided by operating activities  39,185  46,015  44,910 
      
     
     
     
    Investing activities          
    Capital expenditures  (9,092) (17,401) (11,676)
    Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment and assets held for sale  312  47  2,260 
    Payments for net assets of businesses acquired    (3,068) (15,038)
    Purchase of long-term investments    (163) (103)
    Other    1,849   
      
     
     
     
    Net cash used in investing activities  (8,780) (18,736) (24,557)
      
     
     
     
    Financing activities          
    Proceeds from stock issuances  3,172  15,524  2,133 
    Payments of debt issuance costs  (1,579)    
    Restricted stock tax withholdings  (371) (99)  
    Repayments of long-term debt  (60,706) (19,776) (355)
      
     
     
     
    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (59,484) (4,351) 1,778 
      
     
     
     
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (884) (381) 2,092 
      
     
     
     
    Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (29,963) 22,547  24,223 
      
     
     
     
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  147,046  124,499  100,276 
      
     
     
     
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $117,083 $147,046 $124,499 
      
     
     
     
    Supplemental cash flow information          
    Interest paid $6,108 $9,202 $10,201 
    Income taxes paid  1,618  2,915  3,779 
    Non-cash investing and financing activities          
    Exchange of convertible subordinated notes  118,766     
    Transfers from property, plant, and equipment to inventory  1,758  1,486  1,615 
    Transfers from inventory to property, plant, and equipment  181  955   
    Acquisition of assets in connection with the consolidation of a variable interest entity    3,550   
    Assumption of liabilities in connection with the consolidation of a variable interest entity    643   
    Purchase price allocation adjustments relating to acquisition      1,816 
    Accrual of contingent earn-out payments to former shareholders of acquired companies      3,161 

    See

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Operating activities

              

    Net income (loss)

     $361,760 $(15,632)$(75,421)

    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

              
     

    Depreciation and amortization

      12,854  13,865  17,685 
     

    Amortization of debt discount

      3,058  2,846  2,917 
     

    Non-cash equity-based compensation

      9,648  7,547  9,668 
     

    Non-cash asset impairment

        304  51,387 
     

    Non-cash inventory write-off

        1,526   
     

    Non-cash restructuring

      (179)   (105)
     

    Net gain on early extinguishment of debt

          (3,758)
     

    Deferred income taxes

      (25,141) (414) 1,569 
     

    Gain on disposal of segment (see Note 3)

      (156,290)    
     

    Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

      (23,271)    
     

    Other, net

      1,034  44  (87)
     

    Non-cash items from discontinued operations

      10,025  8,805  33,070 
     

    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

              
      

    Accounts receivable

      (83,160) (28,379) 12,727 
      

    Inventories

      (49,535) 10,322  3,683 
      

    Supplier deposits

      (23,296) 117  (122)
      

    Accounts payable

      7,299  3,067  (6,110)
      

    Accrued expenses, deferred profit and other current liabilities

      85,500  51,582  (4,453)
      

    Income taxes payable

      78,894  1,482  (2,931)
      

    Other, net

      (9,491) (2,904) 2,287 
      

    Discontinued operations

      (5,495) 4,860  1,188 
            

    Net cash provided by operating activities

      194,214  59,038  43,194 

    Investing activities

              

    Capital expenditures

      (10,724) (7,460) (11,126)

    Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

        (2,413) (10,981)

    Payments of earn-outs for businesses acquired

        (9,839)  

    Transfers to restricted cash

      (76,115)    

    Proceeds from the maturity of CDARS

      213,641     

    Proceeds from sales of short-term investments

      32,971     

    Payments for purchases of short-term investments

      (506,103) (135,000)  

    Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

      13  834  103 

    Proceeds from disposal of segment, net of transaction fees (see Note 3)

      225,188     

    Discontinued operations

      (492) (887) (1,680)
            

    Net cash used in investing activities

      (121,621) (154,765) (23,684)

    Financing activities

              

    Proceeds from stock option exercises

      45,164  12,586  681 

    Proceeds from issuance of common stock

        130,086   

    Restricted stock tax withholdings

      (4,619) (607) (1,019)

    Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

      23,271     

    Purchases of treasury stock

      (38,098)    

    Repayments of long-term debt

      (213) (196) (32,659)
            

    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

      25,505  141,869  (32,997)

    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

      (1,466) (163) (867)
            

    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

      96,632  45,979  (14,354)

    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

      148,500  102,521  116,875 
            

    Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

     $245,132 $148,500 $102,521 
            

    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

              

    Interest paid

     $4,727 $4,935 $6,530 

    Income taxes paid

      9,925  1,808  3,215 

    Non-cash investing and financing activities

              

    Accrual of payment for net assets of businesses acquired

     $ $1,000 $ 

    Accrual of contingent earn-out payment to former shareholders of acquired company

          9,644 

    Transfers from property, plant and equipment to inventory

      3,913  1,159  404 

    Transfers from inventory to property, plant and equipment

      850  23  385 

    The accompanying notes.notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


    Table of Contents



    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

    December 31, 20072010

    1.     Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

    Business

            Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, "Veeco," the "Company" or "we") designs, manufactures and markets equipment to develop and services a broad linemanufacture light emitting diodes ("LEDs"), solar panels, hard-disk drives and other devices. We have leading technology positions in our two segments: Light Emitting Diode ("LED") & Solar and Data Storage.

            In our LED & Solar segment, we design and manufacture metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, Copper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide ("CIGS") deposition systems and thermal deposition sources that we sell to manufacturers of equipment primarily used by manufacturers in the data storage, high brightness light emitting diodeLEDs ("HB-LED"HB LED"), solar, wireless, and semiconductor, industries. These industries help create a wide range of information age products such as computer integrated circuits, personal computers, LEDs for backlighting and automotive applications, hard disk drives, solar panels, network servers, digital cameras, wireless phones, digital video recorders, personal music/video players,as well as to scientific research customers.

            In our Data Storage segment, we design and personal digital assistants. Our broad line of products feature leading edge technology and allow customers to improve time-to-market of their next generation products. Our products also enable advancements in the growing fields of nanoscience, nanobiology, and other areas of scientific and industrial research.

            Our Process Equipment products precisely deposit or remove (etch) various thin film materials. Our key Process Equipment technologies includemanufacture ion beam etch, ("IBE"), ion beam deposition, ("IBD"), diamond likediamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing productssystems that we primarily used to create thin film magnetic heads ("TFMHs") that read and write data on hard drives, as well asdisk drives.

            We support our metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD")customers through product development, manufacturing, sales and molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") products sold to manufacturers of HB-LEDsservice sites in the U.S., Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and wireless telecommunications devices.

            Our Metrology equipment (atomic force microscopes ("AFMs"), stylus profilers, and optical interferometers) is used to provide critical surface measurements in research and production environments. In production, our equipment allows customers, such as those in semiconductor and data storage, to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process in order to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality. We also sell our broad line of AFMs, scanning probe microscopes, optical interferometers, and stylus profilers to thousands of universities, research facilities, and scientific centers worldwide to enable a variety of nanotechnology related research.other locations.

    Basis of Presentation

            Consistent with prior years, weWe report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 2007 interim quarter ends are April 1, July 1, and September 30. The 20062010 interim quarter ends were April 2, July 2,March 28, June 27 and October 1.September 26. The 2009 interim quarter ends were March 29, June 28 and September 27. For ease of reference, we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30 and September 30 in our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

    Use of Estimates

            The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported inamounts of revenues and expenses during the Consolidated Financial Statementsreporting period. Significant estimates made by management include allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, purchase accounting allocations, recoverability and accompanying notes.useful lives of property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets, recoverability of goodwill, recoverability of deferred tax assets, liabilities for product warranty, accruals for contingencies and equity-based payments, including forfeitures and liabilities for tax uncertainties. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007

    Principles of Consolidation

            The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Veeco our subsidiaries, and a variable interest entity of which we are the primary beneficiary.its subsidiaries. Intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

    Revenue Recognition

            We recognize revenue in accordance withbased on current accounting guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff("SEC") and the Financial Accounting Bulletin No. 104,Standards Board ("FASB"). Our revenue transactions include sales of products under multiple-element arrangements. Revenue Recognition. Certainunder these arrangements is allocated to each element based upon its estimated fair market value.

            We consider a broad array of facts and circumstances when evaluating each of our product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. A multiple-element arrangement is a transaction which may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, or rightsdetermining when to use assets, and performance may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time.

            We recognize revenue, when persuasiveincluding specific terms of the purchase order, contractual obligations to the customer, the complexity of the customer's post-delivery acceptance provisions, customer creditworthiness and the installation process. Management also considers the party responsible for installation, whether there are process specification requirements which need to be demonstrated before final sign off and payment, whether Veeco can replicate the field testing conditions and procedures in our factory and our past experience with demonstrating and installing a particular system. Sales arrangements are reviewed on a case-by-case basis; however, the Company's revenue recognition protocol for established systems is as described below.

            System revenue is generally recognized upon shipment or delivery provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price isprices are contractually fixed or determinable, and collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured.

            For products produced according to our published specifications, whereassured and there are no material uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. Revenue from installation is required or installation is deemed perfunctory and no substantive customer acceptance provisions exist, revenueservices is recognized when title passesat the time acceptance is received from the customer. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales arrangement is deferred until the criteria have been met or all elements have been delivered to the customer generally upon shipment.or been completed.

            For those transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either at the time of shipment or delivery, our sales and contractual arrangements with customers do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions. In the rare instances where such provisions are included, the Company defers all revenue until customer acceptance is achieved. In cases where products produced according toare sold with a particular customer's specifications, revenue is recognized when the product has been tested and it has been demonstrated that it meets the customer's specifications and title passes to the customer. The amountretention of revenue recognized is reduced by the amount of any customer retention (generally 10% to 20%), which is nottypically payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance provisions are completed, the customer has the right to withhold this payment until installation is completed and final customer acceptance issuch provisions have been achieved. Installation is not deemed to be essential toWe defer the functionalitygreater of the equipment since installation does not involve significant changes toretention amount or the features or capabilities of the equipment or building complex interfaces and connections. In addition, the equipment could be installed by the customer or other vendors and generally the cost of installation approximates only 1% to 2% of the salesfair value of the related equipment.installation on systems that we recognize revenue at the time of shipment or delivery.

            For new products, new applications of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting customeragreed upon specifications at the customer site, revenue is deferred as deferred profit in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and fully recognized upon completion of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance. Since title

            Our systems are principally sold to goodsmanufacturers in the HB-LED, the data storage and solar industries. Sales arrangements for these systems generally passesinclude customer acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. Prior to shipment a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning within agreed upon shipment and 80%specifications. Such source inspection or test data replicates the acceptance testing that will be performed at the customer's site prior to 90%final acceptance of the contract amount becomes payable at that time, inventory is relievedsystem. Customer acceptance provisions include reassembly and accounts receivable is recognized forinstallation of the amount billedsystem at the time of shipment. The profit on the amount billed for these transactions is deferred and recognized as deferred profit in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

            Service and maintenance contract revenues are recognized as deferred revenue,customer site, which is included in other accrued expenses, and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the service period of the related contracts.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

            We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three monthsincludes performing functional or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.mechanical test procedures (i.e. hardware checks, leak testing,


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010


    gas flow monitoring and quality control checks of the basic features of the product.) Additionally, a material demonstration process may be performed to validate the functionality of the product. Upon meeting the agreed upon specifications the customer approves final acceptance of the product.

            Veeco generally is required to install these products and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer's facility. Such installations typically are not considered complex and the installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment because it does not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complex interfaces or connections. We have a demonstrated history of completing such installations in a timely, consistent manner and can reliably estimate the costs of such. In such cases, the test environment at our facilities prior to shipment replicates the customer's environment. While there are others in the industry with sufficient knowledge about the installation process for our systems as a practical matter, most customers engage the Company to perform the installation services.

            In Japan, where our contractual terms with customers generally specify risk of loss and title transfers upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon receipt of written customer acceptance.

            Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term. Component and spare part revenue is recognized at the time of shipment or delivery in accordance with the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

            Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. Such items may include cash in operating bank accounts, liquid money market accounts, treasury bills, commercial paper, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insured corporate bonds and certificates of deposit placed through an account registry service ("CDARS") with maturities of three months or less when purchased. CDARS, commercial paper and treasury bills classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair market value.

    Short-Term Investments

            We determine the appropriate balance sheet classification of our investments at the time of purchase and evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These securities include FDIC insured corporate bonds, treasury bills, commercial paper and CDARS with maturities of greater than three months when purchased in principal amounts that, when aggregated with interest to accrue over the term, will not exceed FDIC limits. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income (loss) and reported in equity. Net realized gains and losses are included in net income (loss) attributable to Veeco.

    Concentration of Credit Risk

            Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and, where appropriate, require that letters of credit be provided on certain foreign sales arrangements. We maintain allowances for potential credit losses and make


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    investments with strong, higher credit quality issuers and continuously monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.

    Inventories

            Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work in process, finished goods, and spare parts.parts and other service inventory. Obsolete or slow-moving inventory, based upon historical usage or inventory in excess of management's estimated usage for the next 12 months' requirements is written down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management's estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of excess inventory.

    Depreciable AssetsGoodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

            Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by the straight-line method and are charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the leasehold improvement and the lease term.

    Capitalized Software Costs

    We follow the provisions of FASB Statement No. 86,Accounting for Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1,Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, to account for our software development costs. The capitalization of software costs includes costs incurred by us in developing products that qualify for capitalization as well as costs to purchasegoodwill and develop software for internal use. We capitalize costs associated with product development, coding, and testing subsequent to establishing technological feasibility of the product. Technological feasibility is established after completion of a detailed program design or working model. Capitalization of computer software costs ceases upon a product's general availability or release. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software product starting from the date of general availability. Amortization expense of $1.1 million and $0.8 million related to capitalized costs incurred in developing products is included in cost of sales in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. No amortization expense related to capitalized costs incurred in developing products was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005.

    Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets

            Intangible assets consist of customer-related intangible assets, purchased technology, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses, and deferred finance costs. Intangible assets are amortized over periods ranging from 2 years to 17 years using the straight-line method. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets with definiteindefinite useful lives in accordance with relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the next five fiscal yearsassets.

            Pursuant to the aforementioned guidance we are required to determine if it is appropriate to use the operating segment, as follows (in thousands):defined under guidance for segment reporting, as the reporting unit, or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified two reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment. The reporting units are Data Storage and LED & Solar. In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

    2008 $8,621
    2009  7,840
    2010  7,576
    2011  6,928
    2012  5,330

            We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

            CostsIf the carrying value of applying forthe reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

    Definite-Lived Intangible and registering specific patents are classified as otherLong-Lived Assets

            Intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Aspatents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of December 31, 2007the core proprietary manufacturing technologies associated with the products and 2006, we had net capitalized patentofferings obtained through acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks and covenants not-to-compete are initially recorded at fair value and software licenses and deferred financing costs of $4.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Costsare initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods ranging from 2 years to defend certain patents are being capitalized. If we are not successful in defending the patents, these costs may be required to be written down.17 years.

            The carrying valuesProperty, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

            Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible and other long-lived assets with definite useful lives, are periodically reviewed to determine if anyfor impairment indicators are present. If it is determined that such indicators are present and the review indicateswhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets willcarrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization or depreciation periods, the carrying values of such assets are reduced to estimated fair value.recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there isare identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups.

            In the fourth quarter Recoverability of 2007, management discontinued certain product lines that we determined were not viable based on our current viewassets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the business. We identified and wrote off certain fixed assets associated with these product lines, and recordedcarrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of $1.1 millionthe asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

    Cost Method of Accounting for Investments

            Investee companies not accounted for under the consolidation or the equity method of accounting are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Under this method, the Company's share of the earnings or losses of such investee companies is not included in 2007. No assetthe Consolidated Balance Sheet or Statement of Operations. However, impairment charges were recorded during 2006 and 2005.

    Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

            Underare recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,Operations. If circumstances suggest that the intangible assets that are classified as goodwill and those with indefinite lives are not amortized. SFAS No. 142 also requires that an impairment test be performed to support the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets at least annually. Our policythe investee company has subsequently recovered, such recovery is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.

            We have identified four reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The four reporting units are Ion Beam and Mechanical Process Equipment, Epitaxial Process Equipment, AFM and Optical Metrology. Together, Ion Beam and Mechanical Process Equipment and Epitaxial Process Equipment comprise the Process Equipment operating segment. AFM and Optical Metrology comprise the Metrology operating segment.

            During the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006, we performed the required annual impairment test, and based upon the judgment of management, determined that no impairment exists.

            Changes in our goodwill during 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

     
     2007
     2006
    Balance as of January 1 $100,898 $99,622
    Fluens acquisition    1,276
      
     
    Balance as of December 31 $100,898 $100,898
      
     

            We have $7.9 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets, consisting of trademarks and tradenames, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007not recorded.

    Fair Value of Financial Instruments

            Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 107,Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments ("SFAS 107"), requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate.        We believe that the carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, reflected in the consolidated financial statements approximate fair value due to their short termshort-term maturities.

    The fair valuesvalue of our debt, including current maturities, areis estimated using a discounted cash flow analyses,analysis, based on the estimated current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of securities or based on market value for our publicly traded debt (see Note 4)7).


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

    Derivative Financial Instruments

            We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on earnings and cash flows. In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In order to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known foreign currency exposures, we enter into monthly forward contracts. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our forward contracts doare not expected to subject us to material risks due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset exchange gains and losses on the underlying assets and liabilities; both theliabilities. The forward contracts and the underlying assets and liabilities are marked-to-market through earnings. We conduct our derivative transactions with a highly rated financial institution and therefore are not subjectinstitutions in an effort to amitigate any material credit risk.

            The aggregate foreign currency exchange lossgain (loss) included in determining consolidated results of operations was approximately $0.5$1.3 million, $0.3$(0.7) million and $0.5$(0.1) million in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. Included in the aggregate foreign currency exchange lossgain (loss) were gains (losses) gains relating to forward contracts of ($0.1)$0.1 million, ($0.2)$0.2 million and $0.2($0.4) million in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. These amounts were recognized and are included in other, (income) expense, net.net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

            As of December 31, 2007 and 2006,2010, approximately $0.1$0.3 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and cash in an amount equivalent to such gains waswere subsequently received in January 20082011. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $0.2 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and were subsequently received in January 2007, respectively. On December 27, 2007 and December 28, 2006, we2010. Monthly forward contracts with a notional amount of $18.5 million, entered into forwardin December 2010 for January 2011, will be settled in January 2011.

            The weighted average notional amount of derivative contracts foroutstanding during the months of January 2008 and 2007 for the notional amounts of approximately $7.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The fair values of the contracts at inception were zero, which did not significantly change atyear ended December 31, 20072010 was approximately $6.2 million.

    Translation of Foreign Currencies

            Certain of our international subsidiaries operate primarily using local functional currencies. Foreign currency denominated assets and 2006.liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts and cash flow items are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the respective periods. Net exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign financial statements and the effect of exchange rates on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a separate component of equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any foreign currency gains or losses related to transactions are included in operating results.

    Environmental Compliance and Remediation

            Environmental compliance costs include ongoing maintenance, monitoring and similar costs. Such costs are expensed as incurred. Environmental remediation costs are accrued when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the cost can be reasonably estimated.

    Foreign Operations

            Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates existing at the balance sheet date. Resulting translation adjustments due to fluctuations in the exchange rates are recognized as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates during the respective periods.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

            Our accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.3$5.8 million and $3.6$7.1 million at December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively, isconsists primarily due toof foreign currency translation adjustments.

    Research and Development Costs

            Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and include expenses for the development of new technology and the transition of the technology into new products or services.

    Warranty Costs

            We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide for our products and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

    Income Taxes

            As part of the process of preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

            We record valuation allowances in order to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

            Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

    Advertising Expense

            The cost of advertising is expensed as of the first showing of each advertisement. We incurred $3.3$1.5 million, $3.5$0.7 million and $3.4$1.3 million in advertising costsexpenses during 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively.

    Shipping and Handling Costs

            Shipping and handling costs are costs that are incurred to move, package and prepare our products for shipment and then to move the products to the customer's designated location. These costs are generally comprised of payments to third-party shippers. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in our consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations.

    Share-BasedEquity-Based Compensation

            As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had stock option and restricted stock plans, which are described more fully in Note 5. We also assumed certain stock option plans and agreements in connection with various acquisitions, as also discussed in Note 5.

            Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the modified prospective method of application, which requires us to recognize compensation expense on a prospective basis. Share-basedEquity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. SFAS No. 123(R) also requiresIn order to determine the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow, as required under previous accounting literature, which has the effect of reducing consolidated cash flows from operations and increasing cash flows from financing activities in periods after adoption. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we did not recognize any amount of consolidated financing cash flows for such excess tax deductions.

            Prior to 2006, we accounted for our stock option and restricted stock plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, and generally, no compensation expense was reflected in net income as options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the marketfair value of the underlying common stock options on the date of grant.grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and expected option term.

            The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical and future expectation of dividend payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and expected option term assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.

            We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical volatility, calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and implied volatility, utilizing market data of actively traded options on our common stock, which are obtained from public data sources. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

            The expected option term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

            We estimate forfeitures using historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

            With regard to the expected option term assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

    (Loss) Earnings Per ShareRecent Accounting Pronouncements

            Business Combinations:    In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Business Combinations. The amendments affect any public entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will assess the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements if and when an acquisition occurs.

            Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:    In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. The amendments modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

            Subsequent Events:    The FASB has issued amended guidance for subsequent events. The amendment removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC's literature. All of the amendments were effective upon issuance (February 24, 2010). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

            Fair Value Measurements:    In January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This update requires some new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. The FASB's objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, this update requires that a reporting entity disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, this update clarifies the requirements of existing disclosures. For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update was adopted on January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

            Revenue Recognition:    In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to multiple-element arrangements which requires an entity to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of an arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This update eliminates the use of the residual method of allocation and requires the relative-selling-price method in all circumstances. All entities must adopt the guidance no later than the beginning of their first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Entities may elect to adopt the guidance through either prospective application for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified, after the effective date or through retrospective application to all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

            In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance that is expected to significantly affect how entities account for revenue arrangements that contain both hardware and software elements. As a result, many tangible products that rely on software will be accounted for under the revised multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance, rather than the software revenue recognition guidance. The revised guidance must be adopted by all entities no later than fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. An entity must select the same transition method and same period for the adoption of both this guidance and the revisions to the multiple-element arrangements guidance noted above. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

    2.     Income (Loss) Per Common Share Attributable to Veeco

            The following table sets forth basic and diluted net income (loss) income per common share and the reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding (share amounts (in thousands)thousands, except per share data):

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Net (loss) income per common share $(0.56)$0.49 $(0.03)
    Diluted net (loss) income per common share $(0.56)$0.48 $(0.03)
    Weighted average shares outstanding  31,020  30,492  29,921 
    Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards and units    567   
      
     
     
     
    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  31,020  31,059  29,921 
      
     
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Net income (loss)

     $361,760 $(15,632)$(75,421)

    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

        (65) (230)
            

    Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

     $361,760 $(15,567)$(75,191)
            

    Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

              

    Basic

     $9.16 $(0.48)$(2.40)
            

    Diluted

     $8.51 $(0.48)$(2.40)
            

    Basic weighted average shares outstanding

      39,499  32,628  31,347 

    Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards and units and convertible debt

      3,015     
            

    Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

      42,514  32,628  31,347 
            

            (Loss) earningsBasic income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The effect of approximately 326,000761,000 and 223,000170,000 common equivalent shares for the years ended December 31, 20072009 and 2005,2008, respectively, were excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding due to athe net losslosses sustained for each period.these periods. No shares were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2010.

            In December 2001 andAt January 2002,1, 2008 we issued a total of $220.0 million ofhad unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 2008, which were convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, into shares of common stock at$25.2 million having a conversion price of $38.51 per share.share (the "Old Notes") which was due and subsequently paid in December 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the assumed conversion of these notes was 5.7 million common equivalent shares, which were anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for that period. During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of the notes, and for the year ended December 31, 2006, the assumed conversion of the remaining $200.0 million of notes was 5.3 million common equivalent shares, which were anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for that period. The repurchase and the exchange reduced the effect on earnings per share of2008, the assumed conversion of the Old Notes which was calculated using the "if converted" method of accounting.

            During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased an additional $56.00.5 million of the notes, and during the second quarter of 2007, we issued a new series of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") due April 15, 2012, pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of our outstanding 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the "Old Notes"). In total, we exchanged $118.8 million of Old Notes for $117.8 million of New Notes. Of the original notes, $25.2 million remained outstanding subsequentcommon equivalent shares. Due to the exchange. Fornet loss reported for the year ended December 31, 2007,period, the weighted-average effect of the assumed conversion of the Old Notes is approximately 1.8 million shares, and at December 31, 2007, the effect of the assumed conversion of the Old Notes is approximately 0.6 million shares. The convertible shares are anti-dilutive and, therefore, are not included in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2007.2008.

            At January 1, 2008 we had new unsecured convertible subordinated notes of $117.8 million having a conversion price of $27.23 per share (the "New Notes") of which $12.2 million was repurchased in the fourth quarter of 2008. The New Notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, as long as we have the ability and the intent to settle the principal amount of the New Notes in cash. Under the terms of the New Notes, we may pay the principal


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007


    amount of converted New Notes in cash or in shares of common stock. We have indicated that we intend to pay such amounts in cash. Using the treasury stock method, the impact of the assumed conversion of the New Notes is anti-dilutivehad a dilutive affect of 1.2 million shares for the year ended December 31, 2007,2010 and was anti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, as the


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    average stock price was below the conversion price of $27.23 for the period. The effect of the assumed converted shares is dependent on the stock price at the time of the conversion. The maximum number of shares that can be issued upon conversion of the New Notes were 5.4 million common equivalent shares issuable upon conversion is approximately 6.0for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (see Note 7).

    3.     Discontinued Operations

            On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker Corporation ("Bruker") comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. See Note 4Accordingly, Metrology's operating results are accounted for further details on our debt.

    Recent Accounting Pronouncements

            In September 2006,as discontinued operations in determining the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Currently we believe the impact in 2008 will be on our disclosures only. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

            On February 12, 2008,operations and the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 ("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-2 amends SFAS 157 to delay the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, FSP 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.

            In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure financialrelated assets and liabilities (exceptare classified as held for those that are specifically scopedsale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for all periods presented. The sales transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. As part of our agreement with Bruker, $22.9 million of proceeds is held in escrow and is restricted from use for one year from the closing date of the transaction to secure certain specified losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we made in the Statement) at fair value.stock purchase agreement and related documents. As part of the sale we incurred transaction costs, which consisted of investment bank fees and legal fees, totaling $5.2 million. The electionCompany recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $156.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain of $5.4 million related to measurethe assets in China.

            The following is a financial asset or liability at fair value can be madesummary of the net assets sold as of the closing date on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes October 7, 2010(in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoptionthousands):

     
     October 7, 2010 

    Assets

        

    Accounts receivable, net

     $21,866 

    Inventories

      26,431 

    Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

      13,408 

    Goodwill

      7,419 

    Other assets

      5,485 
        

    Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

     $74,609 
        

    Liabilities

        

    Accounts payable

     $7,616 

    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

      5,284 
        

    Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

     $12,900 
        

    Table of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.Contents

            In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS 160"). Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date at fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) also changes the accounting treatment for certain other items that relate to business combinations. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The purpose of SFAS 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. The most significant provisions of this statement result in changes to the presentation of noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement will impact the manner in which we present noncontrolling interests, but will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

    2.     Business Combinations        Summary information related to discontinued operations is as follows (in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Net sales

     $92,011 $97,737 $127,874 

    Cost of sales

      47,822  57,410  74,551 
            

    Gross profit

      44,189  40,327  53,323 

    Total operating expenses

      45,024  43,030  77,741 
            

    Operating loss

     $(835)$(2,703)$(24,418)
            

    Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

     $101,229 $(1,403)$24,588 
            


     
     December 31,  
     
     
     2010 2009  
     

    Assets

              

    Cash

     $ $89    

    Accounts receivable, net

        16,812    

    Inventories

        21,757    

    Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

        14,682    

    Goodwill

        7,419    

    Other assets

        9,327    
             

    Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

     $ $70,086    
             

    Liabilities

              

    Accounts payable

     $ $4,202    

    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

      5,359  6,622    
             

    Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

     $5,359 $10,824    
             

    Fluens Corporation4.     Fair Value Measurements

            We have categorized our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based upon the fair value hierarchy. The levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:

      Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

      Level 2 inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

      Level 3 inputs are unobservable and are typically based on our own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.

    In 2006, we invested $0.5 millioncertain cases, the inputs used to purchase 19.9%measure fair value may fall into different levels of the common stock of Fluens Corporation ("Fluens"). Approximately 31% of Fluensfair value hierarchy. In such cases, we categorize such assets or liabilities based on the lowest level input that is owned by one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Veeco and Fluens have jointly developed a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications. If this development is successful and uponsignificant to the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, we will be obligated to purchase the balancefair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the outstanding stocksignificance of Fluens for $3.5 million plus an earn-out payment based on future performance.a

            We determined that Fluens is a variable interest entity and that we are its primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46(R),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003)—an interpretation of ARB No. 51, which requires us to consolidate the results of Fluens' operations from the acquisition date. As such, Fluens' results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the period from May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006, are included within the Process Equipment segment in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, and we have attributed the 80.1% portion of Fluens that we do not own to noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As part of the acquisition accounting, we recorded $1.2 million of in-process technology, which was written off during 2006. Fluens' results of operations prior to the acquisition were not material to the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

            As of December 31, 2007, the balance of noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet was $1.0 million. The total net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest in Fluens for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

    3.     Balance Sheet Information (in thousands)

    Inventories

     
     December 31,
      
     
     2007
     2006
      
     Raw materials(1) $58,157 $60,249  
     Work in process(1)  27,330  27,961  
     Finished goods  13,107  12,145  
      
     
      
      $98,594 $100,355  
      
     
      

    (1)
    The prior period has been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

    Property, plant, and equipment

     
     December 31,
      
     
     Estimated Useful Lives
     
     2007
     2006
     Land $9,274 $9,274  
     Buildings and improvements  41,386  40,913 10-40 years
     Machinery and equipment  102,997  105,759 3-10 years
     Leasehold improvements  7,404  5,651 3-7 years
      
     
      
       161,061  161,597  
    Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  94,919  88,087  
      
     
      
      $66,142 $73,510  
      
     
      

    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

    particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset.

            Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category presented below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in historical company data) inputs.

            The major categories of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis, at fair value, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in millions):

     
     December 31, 2010 
     
     Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

    Treasury bills

     $136.2 $79.5 $ $215.7 

    FDIC insured corporate bonds

      129.4      129.4 

    Commercial paper

      128.6  62.8    191.4 

    Money market instruments

        0.6    0.6 

    Derivative instrument

        0.3    0.3 
              
     

    Total

     $394.2 $143.2 $ $537.4 
              


     
     December 31, 2009 
     
     Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

    CDAR's

     $ $180.0 $ $180.0 

    Derivative instrument

        0.2    0.2 
              
     

    Total

     $ $180.2 $ $180.2 
              

            CDARS, commercial paper and treasury bills that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value. Accordingly, no gains or losses (realized/unrealized) have been incurred for cash equivalents. All investments classified as available-for-sale contain quoted prices in active markets.

            Derivative instruments include foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency transactions. Derivative instruments are valued using standard calculations/models that are primarily based on observable inputs, including foreign currency exchange rates, volatilities and interest rates.

            The major categories of assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis, at fair value, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in millions):

     
     December 31, 2010 
     
     Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

    Property, plant and equipment, net

     $ $ $42.3 $42.3 

    Goodwill

          52.0  52.0 

    Intangible assets, net

          16.9  16.9 

    Restructuring liability

          (1.0) (1.0)
              
     

    Total

     $ $ $110.2 $110.2 
              

    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


     
     December 31, 2009 
     
     Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

    Property, plant and equipment, net

     $ $ $44.7 $44.7 

    Goodwill

          52.0  52.0 

    Intangible assets, net

          21.8  21.8 

    Asset retirement obligation

          (0.2) (0.2)

    Restructuring liability

          (2.4) (2.4)
              
     

    Total

     $ $ $115.9 $115.9 
              

    5.     Business Combinations

    Mill Lane Engineering Co., Inc.

            On May 22, 2008, we acquired Mill Lane Engineering Co., Inc. ("Mill Lane"), a privately held manufacturer of web coating systems for flexible solar panels, for a purchase price of $11.0 million, net of cash acquired, plus potential future earn-out payments of up to $19.0 million (representing additional purchase price) contingent upon the future achievement of certain operating performance criteria. Fees related to the acquisition were $0.7 million. Mill Lane is based in Lowell, Massachusetts and at the time of acquisition had approximately 20 employees. The financial results of Mill Lane are included in our LED & Solar segment (see Note 11) as of the acquisition date. We have determined that this acquisition does not constitute a material business combination and therefore are not including pro forma financial statements in this report.

            As of December 31, 2008, we had accrued $9.6 million for our earn-out obligation due to the former owners of Mill Lane resulting from the achievement of certain operating performance criteria earned through the end of the fourth quarter of 2008. Payment of this earn-out obligation was made in the first quarter of 2009. As of December 31, 2010, no earn-out obligations remain under this purchase arrangement.

    6.     Balance Sheet Information

    Short-term Investments

            Available-for-sale securities consist of the following (in thousands):

     
     December 31, 2010 
     
     Amortized
    Cost
     Gains in Accumulated
    Other Comprehensive
    Income
     Losses in Accumulated
    Other Comprehensive
    Income
     Estimated
    Fair Value
     

    Commercial paper

     $128,527 $61 $ $128,588 

    FDIC insured corporate bonds

      129,353  24    129,377 

    Treasury bills

      136,203  12    136,215 
              
     

    Total available-for-sale securities

     $394,083 $97 $ $394,180 
              

            During the year ended December 31, 2010, available-for-sale securities were sold for total proceeds of $246.6 million. The gross realized gains on these sales were minimal for the year ended December 31, 2010. For purpose of determining gross realized gains, the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. The net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities amounted to


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and has been included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

            Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):

     
     Estimated
    Fair Value
     

    Due in one year or less

     $216,244 

    Due in 1-2 years

      177,936 
        
     

    Total investments in debt securities

     $394,180 
        

            Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

    Restricted Cash

            As of December 31, 2010, restricted cash consists of $22.9 million that relates to the proceeds received from the sale of our Metrology segment. This cash is held in escrow and is restricted from use for one year from the closing date of the transaction (see Note 3). Additionally, restricted cash also consists of $53.2 million which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance that the Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is held in custody by the issuing bank, and is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.

    Inventories

     
     December 31,  
     
     2010 2009  
     

    Raw materials

     $49,953 $34,214  
     

    Work in process

      33,181  17,908  
     

    Finished goods

      25,353  3,685  
           

     $108,487 $55,807  
           

    Property, Plant and Equipment

     
     December 31,  
     
     Estimated
    Useful Lives
     
     2010 2009
     

    Land

     $7,274 $7,274  
     

    Buildings and improvements

      30,731  30,707 10-40 years
     

    Machinery and equipment

      73,173  71,358 3-10 years
     

    Leasehold improvements

      2,276  3,548 3-7 years
           
     

    Gross property, plant, and equipment at cost

      113,454  112,887  

    Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

      71,134  68,180  
           

    Net property, plant, and equipment at cost

     $42,320 $44,707  
           

    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

            For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, depreciation expense was $13.6$8.0 million, $13.2$8.7 million and $13.2$8.8 million, respectively.

    Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

            In accordance with the relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, we conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarters of 2010 and 2009, using October 1st as our measurement date, and utilizing a discounted future cash flow approach as described in Note 1. This was consistent with the approach used in previous years. Based upon the results of such assessments, we determined that no goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment existed in any of its reporting units, as of October 1, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

            Changes in our goodwill are as follows (in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Balance as of January 1

     $52,003 $51,741 

    Acquisition

        262 
          

    Balance as of December 31

     $52,003 $52,003 
          

            As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $2.9 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets consisting of trademarks and tradenames, which are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets in the caption intangible assets, net.

    Intangible Assets

     
     December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 
     
     Purchased
    technology
     Other
    intangible
    assets
     Total
    intangible
    assets
     Purchased
    technology
     Other
    intangible
    assets
     Total
    intangible
    assets
     

    Gross intangible assets

     $98,473 $22,734 $121,207 $98,473 $22,734 $121,207 

    Less accumulated amortization

      (86,376) (17,938) (104,314) (83,352) (16,085) (99,437)
                  

    Intangible assets, net

     $12,097 $4,796 $16,893 $15,121 $6,649 $21,770 
                  

            The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

    2011

     $4,054 

    2012

      3,154 

    2013

      1,796 

    2014

      1,433 

    2015

      1,334 

            In accordance with the relevant accounting guidance related to the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, we performed an analysis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 of our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets. No impairment existed in any of our reporting units.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

    Accrued Expenses

     
     December 31,
      
     
     2007
     2006
      
     Payroll and related benefits $17,066 $22,578  
     Sales, use, and other taxes  3,846  3,810  
     Customer deposits and advanced billings  19,558  6,407  
     Warranty  6,502  7,118  
     Restructuring reserve  4,318    
     Other  8,911  8,801  
      
     
      
      $60,201 $48,714  
      
     
      

     
     December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Payroll and related benefits

     $27,374 $20,245 

    Sales, use, income and other taxes

      4,914  3,287 

    Customer deposits and advanced billings

      129,225  59,758 

    Warranty

      9,238  6,675 

    Restructuring liability

      714  2,451 

    Other

      11,545  7,407 
          

     $183,010 $99,823 
          

    Accrued Warranty

            We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide for our products and recognize a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liability include product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recognized warranty liability and adjust the amount as necessary. Changes in our warranty liability during the periodyear are as follows:

     
     2007
     2006
     
    Balance as of beginning of year $7,118 $6,671 
    Warranties issued during the period  5,913  7,123 
    Settlements made during the period  (6,529) (6,676)
      
     
     
    Balance as of end of year $6,502 $7,118 
      
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Balance as of the beginning of year

     $6,675 $5,533 

    Warranties issued during the year

      9,695  4,777 

    Settlements made during the year

      (7,132) (3,635)
          

    Balance as of the end of year

     $9,238 $6,675 
          

    4.     DebtTable of Contents

    Credit Agreement

            During the third quarter of 2007, we entered into a credit agreement with HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent ("HSBC"), and the lenders named therein (the "New Credit Agreement"). The New Credit Agreement amends and restates, and effectively replaces, the prior Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, among us, HSBC and the lenders named therein (the "Prior Credit Agreement"). The Prior Credit Agreement was set to expire on March 15, 2008.

            The New Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit borrowings of up to $100.0 million. The annual interest rate under the New Credit Agreement is a floating rate equal to the prime rate of the agent bank. A LIBOR-based interest rate option is also provided. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements and acquisitions. The New Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants substantially similar to those of the Prior Credit Agreement. These include limitations with respect to the incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010


    dividends, long-term leases, investments, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and sales of assets. The New Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, and we are required to satisfy certain financial tests under the New Credit Agreement substantially similar to those of the Prior Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2007, we are in compliance with all covenants, as amended. Substantially all of our assets and those of our material domestic subsidiaries, other than real estate, have been pledged to secure our obligations under the New Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility under the New Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2012. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, we paid approximately $0.2 million in fees, which will be amortized over the term of the agreement, along with the remaining deferred financing fees of less than $0.1 million associated with the Prior Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were no borrowings or unsecured letters of credit outstanding. Interest expense associated with the credit agreement recorded during the period was approximately $0.2 million, and $0.1 million remains in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2007.7. Debt

    Long-term Debt

            Long-term debt is summarized as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     December 31,
     
     2007
     2006
    Convertible subordinated debt $142,978 $200,000
    Mortgage notes payable  3,472  9,069
    Other  135  135
      
     
       146,585  209,204
    Less current portion  25,550  5,597
      
     
      $121,035 $203,607
      
     

     
     December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Convertible subordinated debt

     $101,138 $98,081 

    Mortgage notes payable

      2,883  3,095 
          

      104,021  101,176 

    Less current portion

      101,367  212 
          

     $2,654 $100,964 
          

    Convertible Subordinated Debt

            On December 21, 2001,At January 1, 2008 we issued $200.0 million of unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 2008, and on January 3, 2002, we issued an additional $20.0 million ofhad new unsecured convertible subordinated notes pursuant to the exercise of an over-allotment option. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, into shares of common stock at$117.8 million having a conversion price of $38.51$27.23 per share. We pay interest on these notes on June 21 and December 21share (the "Notes") of each year. The notes are set to mature on December 21, 2008 and are redeemable at our option at the redemption prices set forthwhich $12.2 million was repurchased in the indenture governing the notes.

            During the firstfourth quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million2008. The Notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the notes, reducingassumed conversion using the amount outstanding from $220.0 milliontreasury stock method of accounting, as long as we have the ability and the intent to $200.0 million. The repurchase amount was $19.5 million in cash, of which $19.4 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest. As a result ofsettle the repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3 million. At December 31, 2006, $200.0 million of these notes were outstanding with a fair market value of $196.0 million.

            During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of these notes for $55.1 million, including accrued interest, reducing the amount of convertible subordinated notes outstanding from


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007


    $200.0 million to $144.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million.

            During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the original 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the "Old Notes"). Under these agreements, such holders agreed to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregatein cash. Under the terms of the Notes, we may pay the principal amount of New Notes. Followingconverted Notes in cash or in shares of common stock. We have indicated that we intend to pay such amounts in cash. Using the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 milliontreasury stock method, the impact of the Oldassumed conversion of the Notes remained outstanding. No net gain or losshad a dilutive affect of 1.2 million shares for the year ended December 31, 2010 and was recordedanti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, as the average stock price was below the conversion price of $27.23 for the period. The effect of the assumed converted shares is dependent on the exchange transactions sincestock price at the carrying valuetime of the Old Notes including unamortized deferred financing costs approximated the exchange valueconversion. The maximum number of shares that can be issued upon conversion of the New Notes. The New Notes mature inwere 5.4 million common equivalent shares for the years ended December 2012.31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

            The New Notes are initially convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of New Notes (equivalent to a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007). On or after April 20, 2011, we may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. Holders may convert the New Notes at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including our common stock trading at prices equal to or above 130% overof the conversion price for at least 20 trading days during the final 30 trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, our common stock was trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for the specified period and, as a specified period.result, the Notes are convertible during the first quarter of 2011. If the Notes are converted, we have the ability and intent to pay the principal balance of notes tendered for conversion in cash. We will re-perform this test each quarter up to and including the fourth quarter of 2011. Accordingly, the balance of the convertible notes at December 31, 2010 has been classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. On February 14, 2011, at the option of the holder, $7.5 million of notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $45.95 per share


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2011 we will take a charge for the related unamortized debt discount totaling $0.3 million. We pay interest on these notes on April 2015 and October 15 of each year. The New Notes are unsecured and subordinated and will rank equally with the original subordinated notes. The notes are effectively subordinated to all of our senior and secured indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

            During the fourth quarter of 2008, we repurchased $12.2 million aggregate of the Notes for $7.2 million in cash, of which $7.1 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest, reducing the amount outstanding from $117.8 million to $105.6 million. A gross gain of approximately $5.1 million was recorded on these repurchases offset by the write-off of approximately $0.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Notes, for a net gain of approximately $5.0 million. Such net gain was reduced to $3.8 million upon the application of accounting guidance (see below), which required that the gain be calculated based on the fair value of the portion repurchased as of the repurchase date. The fair value approximated the carrying value net of the unamortized discount on the portion repurchased. The difference of approximately $1.2 million between the fair value and the amount paid was recorded as a reduction in the gain originally reported, which increased the accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2008 by that amount.

            As of January 1, 2009, we implemented accounting guidance related to our convertible debt and have applied it retrospectively to all periods presented, as required. This guidance requires issuers of convertible debt that can be settled in cash to separately account for (i.e., bifurcate) a portion of the debt associated with the conversion feature and reclassify this portion to equity. The liability portion, which represents the fair value of the debt without the conversion feature, is accreted to its face value over the life of the debt using the effective interest method by amortizing the discount between the face amount and the fair value. The amortization is recorded as interest expense. The notes are subject to such accounting guidance since they may be settled in cash upon conversion. Thus, as a result of the adoption of this accounting guidance, we reclassified approximately $16.3 million from long-term debt to additional paid-in capital effective as of the date of issuance of the Notes. This reclassification created a $16.3 million discount on the debt that will be amortized over the remaining life of the Notes, which will be through April 15, 2012. The reclassification generated a $6.7 million deferred tax liability, which we offset with a corresponding decrease of the valuation allowance by the same amount. Prior periods are presented as if the new guidance was in effect as of the date of issuance. Thus, we have presented all financial data for prior periods in this report as if we had reclassified the $16.3 million and began amortizing the resultant debt discount in April 2007. The retrospective application of the new guidance described above to the results for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased the net loss attributable to Veeco from ($71.1) million to ($75.2) million and increased the loss per share attributable to Veeco from ($2.27) to ($2.40).

            The total effect on equity as of the date of adoption on January 1, 2009 was a net increase of $10.3 million, comprised of an increase in additional paid-in capital of $16.3 million and an increase in the accumulated deficit of $6.0 million. The $6.0 million is comprised of $2.9 million and $1.9 million in amortization of the debt discount for 2008 and 2007, respectively, as well as the $1.2 million reduction in the gain that was recorded on the November 2008 repurchases.

            For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we recorded approximately $3.1 million, $2.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, additional interest expense in each period resulting from the amortization of the debt discount. This additional interest expense did not require the use of cash.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

            The components of interest expense recorded on the Notes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Contractual interest

     $4,355 $4,356 $4,801 

    Amortization of the discount on the Notes

      3,057  2,846  2,917 
            

    Total interest expense on the Notes

     $7,412 $7,202 $7,718 
            

    Effective interest rate

      7.0% 6.8% 6.7%
            

            The carrying amounts of the liability and equity components of the Notes as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Carrying amount of the equity component

     $16,318 $16,318 
          

    Principal balance of the liability component

     $105,574 $105,574 

    Less: unamortized discount

      4,436  7,493 
          

    Net carrying value of the liability component

     $101,138 $98,081 
          

    At December 31, 2007, $25.22010 and 2009, $105.6 million of the Old Notes were outstanding with a fair market valuevalues of $25.0 million. These notes mature on December 21, 2008. At December 31, 2007, $117.8approximately $164.1 million of the New Notes were outstanding with a fair market value of $111.9 million.and $144.6 million, respectively.

    Mortgage Notes Payable

            Long-term debt atas of December 31, 2007,2010, also includes a mortgage note payable, which is secured by certain land and buildings with carrying amounts aggregating approximately $5.4$5.1 million and $5.5$5.2 million atas of December 31, 20072010 and December 31, 2006,2009, respectively. The mortgage note payable ($3.52.9 million atas of December 31, 20072010 and $3.6$3.1 million atas of December 31, 2006)2009) bears interest at an annual rate of 7.91%, with the final payment due on January 1, 2020. The fair market value of this note atas of December 31, 20072010 and 20062009 was approximately $3.8$3.1 million and $4.0$3.3 million, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2007, a second mortgage note payable matured, and we satisfied the mortgage with a final balloon payment of $5.2 million on December 1, 2007. This mortgage note bore interest at an annual rate of 4.75%. The carrying value of the note was $5.5 million at December 31, 2006, with a fair market value of $5.3 million. This note was amortized over a period of 25 years.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

    Maturity of Long-term Debt

            Long-term debt matures as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

    2008 $25,550
    2009  196
    2010  212
    2011  229
    2012  117,992
    Thereafter  2,406
      
       146,585
    Less current portion  25,550
      
      $121,035
      

    2011

     $105,803 

    2012

      248 

    2013

      268 

    2014

      290 

    2015

      314 

    Thereafter

      1,534 
        

      108,457 

    Less current portion

      105,803*
        

     $2,654 
        

    *
    Difference of $4,436 from $101,367 in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is due to the unamortized debt discount.

    5.     Stock8. Equity Compensation Plans and Shareholders' Equity

      Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans

            We have several stock option and restricted stock plans. On April 1, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company, and on May 14, 2010, our shareholders, approved the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"). The Veeco Instruments Inc.2010 Plan replaced the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2000 Plan"), as the Company's active stock plan. The Company's employees, directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan permits the granting of a variety of awards, including both non-qualified and incentive stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units and dividend equivalent rights. The Company is authorized to issue up to 3,500,000 shares under the 2010 Plan. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company's stock on the trading day prior to the date of grant; those option awards generally vest over a 3 year period and have a 7 or 10-year term. Restricted share awards generally vest over 4-5 years. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control, as defined in the 2010 Plan. As of December 31, 2010, there are 625,531 options outstanding under this plan.

            The 2000 Plan was approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders in May 2000. The 2000 Plan provides for the grant to officers and key employees of up to 8,530,000stock awards, either in the form of options (1,869,826 options are available for future grants as of December 31, 2007) to purchase shares of our common stock.stock or restricted stock awards. Stock awards granted pursuant to the 2000 Plan expire after seven years and generally vest over a three-yeartwo-year to five-year period following the grant date. However, option grants made under the 2000 Plan between June 17, 2005 and December 23, 2005 became exercisable on or before December 31, 2005, and were subject to a resale restriction which provided that the shares issuable upon exercise of the option may not be transferred prior to the second anniversary of the option grant date. In addition, the 2000 Plan provides for automatic annual grants of 5,000 shares of restricted stock to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an employee. Up to 1,700,000 of the awards authorized under the 2000 Plan may be issued in the form of restricted stock (918,187 shares of which are available for future grants asAs of December 31, 2007).

            The Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees (the "Non-Officer Plan") was approved by the Board of Directors in October 2000. The Non-Officer Plan provided for the grant of stock2010, there are 1,933,623 options to non-officer employees to purchase shares of our common stock. Stock options granted pursuant to the Non-Officer Plan become exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date and expire after seven years.outstanding under this plan.

            The Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan") provided for the grant to officers and key employees of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock. Stock options granted pursuant to the 1992 Plan became exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date and expire after ten years.

            The Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, as amended, (the "Directors' Option Plan"), provided for automatic annual grants As of December 31, 2010, there are 1,200 stock options to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an employee. Such options are exercisable immediately and expire after ten years.outstanding under this plan.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

            The Non-Officer Plan, the 1992 Plan and the Directors' Option Plan have been frozen; and, thus, there are no options available for future grant as of December 31, 2007 under these plans.

            In addition to the plans described above, we assumed certain stock option plans and agreements relating to the merger in September 2001 with Applied Epi, Inc. ("Applied Epi"). These stock option plans do not have options available for future grants. Options granted under these plans expire after ten years from the date of grant. Options granted under two of thethese plans vested over three years and options granted under one of thethese plans vested immediately. As of December 31, 2007,2010, there are 170,6689,272 options outstanding under the various Applied Epi plans.

            In May 2000, we assumed certain stock option plans and agreements related to CVC, Inc. ("CVC") and Commonwealth Scientific Corporation, a subsidiary of CVC, which were in effect prior to the merger with Veeco. These plans do not have options available for future grants. The options granted under these plans generally vested over a three to five year period and expire five to ten years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2007, there are 6,105 options outstanding under the various CVC and Commonwealth Scientific Corporation plans.

    Share-BasedEquity-Based Compensation, and Stock Option and Restricted Stock Activity

            Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. The following compensation expense was included as part of continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Equity-based compensation expense

     $9,648 $7,547 $9,668 

            As a result of the sale of our Metrology segment to Bruker, equity-based compensation expense related to Metrology employees has been classified as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the total share-based2010, discontinued operations included compensation expense is $5.6of $7.7 million (which includes $0.6 million associated withthat related to the modificationacceleration of equity awards duefrom employees that were terminated as a result of the sale of our Metrology segment to key employee terminations, see Note 7), and forBruker. For the year ended December 31, 2006,2009, total equity-based compensation expense included a charge of $0.7 million for the acceleration of equity awards associated with the retirement of our former CFO. For the year ended December 31, 2008, total equity-based compensation expense was $2.2 million.included a charge of $3.0 million for the acceleration of equity awards associated with a mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with our former CEO (who currently remains as Chairman of the Board of Directors) following the successful completion of the CEO transition.

            As of December 31, 2007,2010, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards and option awards expected to vest is $10.4$9.0 million and $4.0$14.9 million, respectively, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 2.42.6 years bothand 2.1 years for the nonvested stock awards and for option awards.

            Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), SFAS No. 123 required that we provide pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share as if compensation cost for our stock-based awards, had been determined in accordance with the fair value method prescribed therein. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions, under which compensation expense would be recognized as incurred, to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts):

     
     December 31,
     
     
     2005
     
    Net loss, as reported $(897)
    Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss  138 
    Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects  32,576 
      
     
    Pro forma net loss $(33,335)
      
     
    Loss per share:    
     Net loss per common share, as reported $(0.03)
     Net loss per common share, pro forma $(1.11)
     Diluted net loss per common share, as reported $(0.03)
     Diluted net loss per common share, pro forma $(1.11)

    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007

            In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), we record the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as an expense. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, option life, risk-free interest rate, and dividend yield. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.

            Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, we used an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical and implied volatilities of the underlying stock, which are obtained from public data sources. Prior to that time, we based this assumption solely on historical volatility.

            With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.respectively.

            The fair value of each option granted during the years ended December 31, 20072010, 2009 and 2006,2008, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     2007
     2006
    Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility 39% 40%
    Weighted-average expected option life 3 years 3 years
    Average risk-free interest rate 4.60% 4.96%
    Average dividend yield 0% 0%

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     2010 2009 2008

    Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility

     62% 65% 49%

    Weighted-average expected option life

     5 years 4 years 3 years

    Average risk-free interest rate

     1.92% 1.79% 3.14%

    Average dividend yield

     0% 0% 0%

            The fair valueTable of each option grant that was unvested as of January 1, 2006, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:Contents

    Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility60%
    Weighted-average expected option life4 years
    Average risk-free interest rate3.64%
    Average dividend yield0%


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

            A summary of our restricted stock awards including restricted stock units as of December 31, 2007,2010, is presented below:

     
     Shares
    (000s)

     Weighted
    Average
    Grant-Date
    Fair Value

    Nonvested at beginning of year 244 $22.50
    Granted 597  19.00
    Vested (102) 24.30
    Forfeited (including cancelled awards) (59) 18.51
      
       
    Nonvested at December 31, 2007 680  19.50
      
       

     
     Shares (000's) Weighted-
    Average
    Grant-Date
    Fair Value
     

    Nonvested at December 31, 2009

      892 $12.97 

    Granted

      186  34.97 

    Vested(1)

      (365) 12.78 

    Forfeited (including cancelled awards)(2)

      (97) 17.15 
           

    Nonvested at December 31, 2010

      616 $19.06 
           

    (1)
    Includes the effect of approximately 43,383 shares whose vesting was accelerated as a result of the sale of our Metrology business.

    (2)
    Includes the effect of approximately 73,282 shares forfeited as a result of the sale of our Metrology business.

    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007

            During the year ended December 31, 2007,2010, we granted 536,000130,665 shares of restricted common stock and 21,30040,200 restricted stock units to key employees, which vest over three years, andor four year periods. Included in May 2007, we granted 40,000this grant were 14,518 shares of restricted common stock granted to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors throughout the year in May, June and December 2010, which vest over a periodthe lesser of one year. We cancelled 20,203year or at the time of the next annual meeting. The vested shares include the impact of 121,230 shares of restricted stock which were cancelled in 20072010 due to employees electing to receive fewer shares in lieu of paying withholding taxes. The total grant date fair value of shares that vested during the period2010 was $2.5$13.6 million.

            A summary of our stock option plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007,2010, is presented below:

     
     Shares
    (000s)

     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise
    Price

     Aggregate
    Intrinsic
    Value (000s)

     Weighted-
    Average
    Remaining
    Contractual Life
    (in years)

    Outstanding at beginning of year 6,363 $25.58     
    Granted 769  19.10     
    Exercised (194) 15.23     
    Forfeited (including cancelled options) (1,266) 34.60     
      
            
    Outstanding at December 31, 2007 5,672 $23.04 $2,266 3.0
      
            
    Options exercisable at December 31, 2007 4,829 $23.68 $2,200 2.4
      
            

     
     Shares (000s) Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise
    Price
     Aggregate
    Intrinsic
    Value (000s)
     Weighted-
    Average
    Remaining
    Contractual
    Life
    (in years)
     

    Outstanding at December 31, 2009

      4,506 $16.35       

    Granted

      721  35.19       

    Exercised

      (2,500) 18.07       

    Forfeited (including cancelled options)

      (158) 20.47       
                 

    Outstanding at December 31, 2010

      2,569 $19.71 $59,807  5.9 
                 

    Options exercisable at December 31, 2010

      778 $16.36 $20,793  3.9 
                 

            The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008 was $5.68, $7.45,$18.41, $5.35, and $7.97,$5.26, respectively, per option. The total


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008 was $0.9$53.1 million, $4.5$7.3 million and $0.6$0.4 million, respectively.

            The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007:

     
     Options Outstanding
     Options Exercisable
    Range of Exercise Prices

     Number
    Outstanding at
    December 31, 2007
    (000s)

     Weighted-
    Average
    Remaining
    Contractual Life
    (in years)

     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price

     Number
    Exercisable at
    December 31, 2007
    (000s)

     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price

    $0.27 82 3.0 $0.27 82 $0.27
    10.26-15.35 125 4.0  14.62 117  14.65
    15.45-22.80 3,600 3.6  19.41 2,835  19.50
    23.61-35.00 1,689 1.4  29.77 1,619  30.03
    35.75-50.60 147 1.4  47.86 147  47.86
    54.35-72.00 29 2.7  57.11 29  57.11
      
     
     
     
     
      5,672 2.9 $23.04 4,829 $23.67
      
     
     
     
     

    Accelerated Vesting Pre-SFAS No. 123(R)

            On April 12, 2005, the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting for unvested, out-of-the-money stock options granted under our stock option plans prior to September 1, 2004. An option was considered out-of-the-money if the2010:


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007


    option exercise price was greater than the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market on April 11, 2005 ($15.26), the last trading day before the Committee approved the acceleration. As a result of this action, options to purchase approximately 2,522,000 shares of our common stock became immediately exercisable, including options held by our executive officers to purchase approximately 852,000 shares of common stock. The weighted average exercise price of the options for which vesting was accelerated was $21.24. The purpose of the accelerated vesting was to avoid future compensation expense of approximately $7.9 million in 2006, and $3.6 million in 2007 associated with these options that we would otherwise have recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) (see Note 1). In addition, many of these options had exercise prices significantly in excess of current market values and were not providing an effective means of employee retention and incentive compensation.

    Employee Stock Purchase Plan

            Under the Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESP Plan"), we are authorized to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock to our full-time U.S. employees, nearly all of whom are eligible to participate. Under the terms of the ESP Plan, employees can choose to have up to 10% of their annual base earnings withheld to purchase our common stock. The purchase price of the stock as of December 31, 2007 was 95% of the end-of-offering period market price and qualifies as a noncompensatory employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

            Based on past participation levels as well as the costs associated with the administration of this plan, we have discontinued the ESP Plan effective January 1, 2008. Current and former ESP Plan participants will continue to have access to purchased shares through their respective accounts.

     
     Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
    Range of Exercise Prices
     Number
    Outstanding at
    December 31, 2010
    (000s)
     Weighted-
    Average
    Remaining
    Contractual Life
    (in years)
     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price
     Number
    Exercisable at
    December 31, 2010
    (000s)
     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price
     

    $0.27-8.82

      491  5.4 $8.79  122 $8.69 

    9.69-15.08

      656  5.3  12.51  173  12.72 

    15.29-23.55

      713  3.8  18.46  457  18.83 

    23.81-36.00

      594  9.0  33.71  18  24.97 

    39.85-54.35

      115  9.3  42.91  8  54.35 
                

      2,569  5.9 $19.71  778 $16.36 
                

    Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

            As of December 31, 2007,2010, we have reserved the following shares for future issuance related to:

    Issuance upon exercise of stock options and grants of restricted stock

     7,575,8595,280,841

    Issuance upon conversion of subordinated debt

     6,623,019
    Issuance of shares pursuant to the ESP Plan5,350,934 1,440,024
      
     

    Total shares reserved

     15,638,90210,631,775
      

    Issuance of Common Stock

            On October 28, 2009 the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement") with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (the "Underwriters"), for the sale of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, the Underwriters had an option, which they exercised in full, to purchase up to an additional 750,000 shares of our common stock on the same terms for 30 days from the date of the Underwriting Agreement, solely to cover over-allotments. On November 3, 2009, we completed this offering selling 5,750,000 shares for net proceeds totaling $130.1 million, net of transaction costs totaling $0.3 million.

    Preferred Stock

            Our Board of Directors has authority under our Certificate of Incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock with voting and economic rights to be determined by the Board of Directors.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

    6.Treasury Stock

            On August 24, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock until August 26, 2011. Repurchases are expected to be made from time to time on the open market in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The timing of repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will depend upon market conditions, SEC regulations, and other factors. The repurchases will be funded using the Company's available cash balances and cash generated from operations. The program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at the Company's discretion. During 2010, we purchased 1,118,600 shares for $38.1 million (including transaction costs) under the program at an average cost of $34.06 per share. This stock repurchase is included as treasury stock in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    9. Income Taxes

            (Loss)        Our income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Domestic $(23,946)$4,789 $(7,850)
    Foreign  9,610  13,729  11,348 
      
     
     
     
      $(14,336)$18,518 $3,498 
      
     
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Domestic

     $242,305 $(15,789)$(59,777)

    Foreign

      28,698  4,207  10,666 
            

     $271,003 $(11,582)$(49,111)
            

            Significant components of the provision for income taxes from continuing operations are presented below (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Current:          
     Federal $(13)$227 $34 
     Foreign  2,239  3,310  2,939 
     State  221  168  149 
      
     
     
     
    Total current provision for income taxes  2,447  3,705  3,122 
    Deferred:          
     Federal  2,188  77  1,554 
     Foreign  (83) 305  225 
     State  (901) 872  (506)
      
     
     
     
    Total deferred provision for income taxes  1,204  1,254  1,273 
      
     
     
     
    Total provision for income taxes $3,651 $4,959 $4,395 
      
     
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Current:

              

    Federal

     $34,097 $(344)$(360)

    Foreign

      7,720  1,879  1,019 

    State and local

      4,720  799  192 
            

    Total current provision for income taxes

      46,537  2,334  851 

    Deferred:

              

    Federal

      (32,033) 1,015  437 

    Foreign

      239  (273) 359 

    State and local

      (4,271) (429) 75 
            

    Total deferred (benefit) provision for income taxes

      (36,065) 313  871 
            

    Total provision for income taxes

     $10,472 $2,647 $1,722 
            

    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

            The following is a reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) provision computed using the Federal statutory rate to our actual income tax provision (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Income tax (benefit) provision at U.S. statutory rates $(5,018)$6,481 $1,225 
    State income tax benefit (net of federal benefit)  (761) 981  (409)
    Nondeductible expenses  250  263  245 
    Noncontrolling interest in acquisition  219  594   
    Equity compensation  734  297   
    Research and development tax credit  (1,341) (23) (650)
    Benefit of extraterritorial income exclusion    (2,586) (3,717)
    Foreign operating loss currently realizable  (2,083)    
    Net change in valuation allowance  11,414  (2,212) 7,170 
    Reduction in FIN 48 accrual  (702)    
    Foreign tax rate differential  684  1,217  329 
    Other  255  (53) 202 
      
     
     
     
      $3,651 $4,959 $4,395 
      
     
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Income tax provision (benefit) at U.S. statutory rates

     $94,851 $(4,053)$(17,189)

    State income tax expense (benefit) (net of federal impact)

      5,746  188  (1,135)

    Goodwill impairment

          7,985 

    Nondeductible expenses

      333  145  158 

    Noncontrolling interest

        28  495 

    Equity compensation

        1,678  2,519 

    Domestic production activities deduction

      (5,779)    

    Nondeductible compensation

      2,840  826  1,473 

    Research and development tax credit

      (1,823) (1,855) (1,031)

    Net change in valuation allowance

      (83,079) 5,198  10,955 

    Change in accrual for unrecognized tax benefits

      (1,076) (4,114)  

    Foreign tax rate differential

      (5,280) 5,450  (1,419)

    Other

      3,739  (844) (1,089)
            

     $10,472 $2,647 $1,722 
            

            Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010

            Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     
    Deferred tax assets:       
     Inventory valuation $14,243 $10,989 
     Domestic net operating loss carryforwards  41,311  47,791 
     Tax credit carryforwards  20,482  17,212 
     Foreign net operating loss carryforwards  234  587 
     Warranty and installation accruals  1,927  1,973 
     Other accruals  4,585  3,195 
     Other  5,675  4,877 
      
     
     
    Total deferred tax assets  88,457  86,624 
    Valuation allowance  (73,292) (67,770)
      
     
     
    Net deferred tax assets  15,165  18,854 
    Deferred tax liabilities:       
     Depreciation  231  985 
     Purchased intangible assets  14,968  16,498 
     DISC termination  603  803 
     Noncontrolling interest in acquisition  426  426 
      
     
     
    Total deferred tax liabilities  16,228  18,712 
      
     
     
    Net deferred taxes $(1,063)$142 
      
     
     

     
     December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Deferred tax assets:

           
     

    Inventory valuation

     $8,999 $13,261 
     

    Domestic net operating loss carry forwards

      1,219  39,312 
     

    Tax credit carry forwards

      9,961  24,216 
     

    Foreign net operating loss carry forwards

      147  834 
     

    Purchased intangible assets

        6,662 
     

    Warranty and installation accruals

      2,742  2,432 
     

    Equity compensation

      3,655  4,659 
     

    Other accruals

      2,063  1,654 
     

    Depreciation

      1,325  1,815 
     

    Other

      1,890  3,235 
          

    Total deferred tax assets

      32,001  98,080 

    Valuation allowance

      (1,644) (84,723)
          

    Net deferred tax assets

      30,357  13,357 

    Deferred tax liabilities:

           
     

    Purchased intangible assets

      4,854  8,439 
     

    DISC termination

        201 
     

    Convertible debt discount

      1,663  3,072 
     

    Undistributed earnings

      370  3,292 
     

    Other

      264  287 
          

    Total deferred tax liabilities

      7,151  15,291 
          

    Net deferred taxes

     $23,206 $(1,934)
          

            U.S. income taxes haveA provision has not been providedmade at December 31, 2010 for approximately $7.4 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of several non-U.S. subsidiaries. We intend to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in operations outside of the U.S. If these earnings were repatriated,or additional foreign withholding taxes on approximately $39.0 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries because it is the present intention of management to permanently reinvest the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in China, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. As it is our intention to reinvest those earnings permanently, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable if they were remitted. We have provided deferred income taxes and future withholding taxes on the earnings that we anticipate will be remitted.

            We have approximately $1.2$9.2 million would be payable. No additional U.S. tax would be due based on available net operating loss andof foreign tax credit carryforwards.

            We have domestic net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $100.8 million for financial reporting purposes and $116.1 million for tax purposes,carry forwards which expire at various times between 20202016 and 2025. The net2019.

            Based on current operating loss carryforward amounts differ for tax and financial reporting purposes due to the application of the with and without method of accounting for equity compensation as provided for under SFAS No. 123(R), and the impact of unrecognized tax benefits established under FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 ("FIN 48"). We also have credit carryforwards ofresults, we reversed approximately $20.5$83.1 million consisting primarily of research and development credits, which expire at various times between 2017 and 2027, and foreign tax credits, which expire between 2012 and 2017.

            The valuation allowance of $73.3 million at December 31, 2007, increased by approximately $11.4 million during 2007, principally due to timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory and additional tax credit carry forwards, which were partially offset by a $5.9 million decrease in the valuation allowance relating to unrecognized tax benefits established under FIN 48. If we are able to realize part or all of the domestic deferred tax assets in future periods, we will reduce our provision for income taxes with a release of the valuation allowance in an amount that corresponds with the income tax liability generated. Ouras our net deferred tax liabilityassets became realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis. Our remaining valuation allowance of approximately $1.1$1.6 million atrelates primarily to state and local tax attributes for which we could not conclude were realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010


    December 31, 2007, principally related to $2.6 million of deferred tax assets pertaining to our foreign operations, offset by a $3.7 million net deferred tax liability pertaining to our domestic operations. Our net deferred tax asset of approximately $0.1 million at December 31, 2006, principally related to $2.6 million of deferred tax assets pertaining to our foreign operations, offset by a $2.5 million net deferred tax liability pertaining to our domestic operations.

            It is our policy to establish accruals for taxes that may become payable in future years as a result of examinations by tax authorities. We establish the accruals based upon management's assessment of probable contingencies. At December 31, 2006, we accrued $1.5 million for probable contingencies. To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of accruals, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be affected.

            We adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of applying the provisions of FIN 48, we recognized a $0.8 million increase in our accrual for uncertain tax positions during the first quarter of 2007, which was recorded as an increase to the January 1, 2007 accumulated deficit balance. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, we had approximately $2.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including the cumulative effect increase to our accrual for uncertain tax positions. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we had a net reduction of approximately $0.4 million in the accrual related to foreign unrecognized tax benefits. As a result, we had $1.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007, all of which relate to positions taken on our foreign tax returns and represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate in future periods. During 2008, a portion of our unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by approximately $0.5 million due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.

            A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

    Balance as of January 1, 2007 $2,311 
    Additions for tax positions related to current year  561 
    Reductions for tax positions relating to current year  (220)
    Additions for tax positions relating to prior years  111 
    Reductions for tax positions relating to prior years  (844)
    Settlements   
      
     
    Balance as of December 31, 2007 $1,919 
      
     

     
     December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Beginning balance as of December 31

     $1,357 $694 

    Additions for tax positions related to current year

      1,227  725 

    Reductions for tax positions relating to current year

         

    Additions for tax positions relating to prior years

      1,736   

    Reductions for tax positions relating to prior years

      (478) (62)

    Reductions due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

      (17)  

    Settlements

      (165)  
          

    Ending balance as of December 31

     $3,660 $1,357 
          

            We are continuingOf the amounts reflected in the table above at December 31, 2010, the entire amount if recognized would reduce our practice of recognizingeffective tax rate. It is our policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The total accrual for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $0.9$0.3 million and $0.5 million as of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively, the impact of which was to decrease net loss by $0.4 million.

            At January 1, 2007, we reduced our deferred tax asset2010 and related valuation allowance by $5.9 million related to unrecognized tax benefits established under FIN 48. During 2007, we reestablished $0.7 million of such amount.2009, respectively.

            We or one of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. All material federal state, local, and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated in such years. All material state and local income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006. The majority of our foreign jurisdictions have been reviewed through 2008 with only a few jurisdictions having open tax years between 2005 and 2008. None of our federal tax returns are currently under examination.

    10. Commitments and Contingencies and Other Matters

    Restructuring and Other Charges

            During 2008 and 2009, we continued our multi-quarter plan to improve profitability and reduce and contain spending. We made progress against the initiatives that management set in 2007, continued our restructuring plan and executed activities with a focus on creating a more cost effective organization, with a greater percentage of variable costs. These activities included downsizing and consolidating some locations, reducing our workforce, consultants and discretionary expenses and realigning our sales organization and engineering groups.

            In conjunction with these activities, we recognized restructuring (credits) charges of approximately $(0.2) million, $4.8 million and $9.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and an inventory write-off of $1.5 million, included in cost of sales in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations, related to discontinued data storage products during the year


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010


    have been concludedended December 31, 2009. Restructuring expense for the years through 2002 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in such years.

    thousands7.     Commitments and Contingencies and Other Matters):

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Personnel severance and related costs

     $ $3,467 $2,614 

    Lease-related and other (credits) costs

      (179) 1,370  3,873 

    Modification of stock awards

          3,018 
            

     $(179)$4,837 $9,505 

    Less adjustment of 2007 restructuring liability

          (81)
            

     $(179)$4,837 $9,424 
            

    2007 Restructuring and Other ExpensesPersonnel Severance Costs

            During 2007, management initiated a profit improvement plan, resulting2009, we recorded $3.5 million in personnel severance and related costs for approximately 90 employees, or approximately 7.5%resulting from a headcount reduction of total employees, and164 employees. This reduction in workforce included executives, management, administration, sales and service personnel and manufacturing employeesemployees' companywide. Additionally, during

            During 2008, we recorded a $3.7 million restructuring charge related to a mutually agreed-upon termination of the fourth quarteremployment agreement with our former CEO (who currently remains as Chairman of 2007, we took additional measures to improve profitability, including a reductionthe Board of discretionary expenses, realignmentDirectors) following the successful completion of our sales organization to more closely match current market and regional opportunities, and consolidation of certain engineering groups within our data storage business,the CEO transition, which included the discontinuation of two products. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, which was recorded in restructuring expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The charge consisted of the following:

     
     Year ended
    December 31,
    2007

    Personnel severance costs $4,314
    Purchase order commitments  1,840
    Modification of stock awards for terminated executives  572
      
      $6,726
      

            The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the restructuring charge (in thousands):

     
     Process Equipment
     Metrology
     Unallocated Corporate
     Total
    Personnel severance charges $692 $1,153 $2,469 $4,314
    Purchase order commitments  1,840      1,840
      
     
     
     
    Total charged to accrual  2,532  1,153  2,469  6,154
    Cash payments during 2007  452  751  633  1,836
      
     
     
     
    Balance as of December 31, 2007 $2,080 $402 $1,836 $4,318
      
     
     
     

            During the year ended December 31, 2007, the charge of $0.6$3.0 million for the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense and $0.7 million related to salary and other related compensation, as specified in the employment agreement. The modification of the stock awards was recorded as part of a termination agreement with each of five key employees as an increase to additional paid-in capital. TheIn addition, we eliminated approximately 49 employees during 2008 resulting in personnel severance costs of approximately $1.9 million, primarily in connection with increased outsourcing in our LED & Solar and Data Storage segments and realignment of the sales and service organization. This reduction in workforce included executives, management, administration and manufacturing employees' companywide.

    Lease-related and Other Costs

            During 2010, we had a change in estimate relating to one of our leased Data Storage facilities. As a result, we incurred a restructuring credit of $0.2 million, consisting primarily of the remaining lease payment obligations and estimated property taxes for a portion of the facility we will occupy, offset by a reduction in expected sublease income. We made certain assumptions in determining the credit, which included a reduction in estimated sublease income and terms of the modifications included accelerated vesting and extended exercise periods. The remainder of the accrual balance is expected to be paid over the next twelve to eighteen months. We expect to incur an additional $3.5 million to $4.0 million in connection with this restructuring plan during the first quarter of 2008.

            Additionally during the year ended December 31, 2007, we discontinued two product lines, resulting in an inventory write-off of $4.8 million (included in cost of sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations),sublease as well as an asset impairment chargethe estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of $1.1 million attributable to certain propertythe remaining liability. We developed these assumptions based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates. The assumptions are based on management's best estimates, and equipment associated with the aforementioned product lines.will be adjusted periodically if new information is obtained.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007

    2005 Restructuring Expenses2010

            In conjunction withDuring 2009, we vacated our Data Storage facilities in Camarillo, CA. As a cost reduction plan announced in October 2005 to reduce employee headcount by approximately 5%,result, we recognizedincurred a $1.4 million restructuring charge, consisting primarily of approximately $1.2 million. The $1.2 millionthe remaining lease payment obligations and estimated property taxes for the facility we vacated, offset by the estimated expected sublease income to be received. We made certain assumptions in determining the charge, consisted of personnel severance costs for approximately 37 employees which included management, administration,estimated sublease income and manufacturing employees located atterms of the sublease as well as the estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of the liability. We developed these assumptions based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates. The assumptions are based on management's best estimates, and will be adjusted periodically if new information is obtained.

            During 2008, we recorded a $3.9 million restructuring charge for lease-related costs as part of the consolidation of our corporate headquarters into our Plainview, New York Camarillo, California,manufacturing facility during the first quarter of 2008. This charge primarily consisted of the liability for the remaining lease payments and Somerset, New Jersey Process Equipment operations,property taxes relating to the facility we vacated, offset by expected sublease income. We made certain assumptions in determining the charge, which included estimated sublease income and terms of the Santa Barbara, California Metrology operations. Assublease as well as the estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of the net cash flows. We developed these assumptions, based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates, which are adjusted periodically based upon new information, events and changes in the real estate market.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20062010

            The following is a reconciliation of the entire accrualliability for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 restructuring charge from inception through December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

     
     LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
    Corporate
     Total 

    Short-term liability

                 

    Lease-related and other costs 2008

     $ $ $1,189 $1,189 

    Personnel severance and related costs 2008

      732  477  1,405  2,614 
              

    Total charged to accrual 2008

      732  477  2,594  3,803 
              

    Lease-related and other costs 2009

      190  803    993 

    Personnel severance and related costs 2009

      1,005  1,826  636  3,467 
              

    Total charged to accrual 2009

      1,195  2,629  636  4,460 
              

    Lease-related and other (credits) costs 2010

        (87)   (87)
              

    Total (credited) charged to accrual 2010

        (87)   (87)
              

    Short-term/long-term reclassification 2008

          892  892 

    Short-term/long-term reclassification 2009

        148  1,084  1,232 

    Short-term/long-term reclassification 2010

        123  536  659 

    Cash payments 2008

      (72) (207) (1,627) (1,906)

    Cash payments 2009

      (1,502) (2,561) (1,982) (6,045)

    Cash payments 2010

      (353) (344) (1,597) (2,294)
              

    Balance as of December 31, 2010

     $ $178 $536 $714 
              

    Long-term liability

                 

    Lease-related and other costs 2008

     $ $ $2,684 $2,684 

    Lease-related and other costs 2009

        377    377 

    Lease-related and other (credits) costs 2010

        (48)   (48)

    Short-term/long-term reclassification 2008

          (892) (892)

    Short-term/long-term reclassification 2009

        (148) (1,084) (1,232)

    Short-term/long-term reclassification 2010

        (123) (536) (659)

    Other adjustments

          (172) (172)
              

    Balance as of December 31, 2010

     $ $58 $ $58 
              

            The long-term liability will be paid over the remaining life of the leases for the former corporate headquarters and a former Data Storage facility, which expire in June 2011 and May 2012, respectively. We currently do not anticipate or expect to incur additional restructuring charges during 2011.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

            The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the 2007 restructuring charge from inception through December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

     
     LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
    Corporate
     Total 

    Beginning balance at January 1, 2008

     $17 $2,063 $1,492 $3,572 

    Reversal of accrual during 2008

        (81)   (81)

    Cash payments during 2008

      (17) (1,982) (1,247) (3,246)

    Cash payments during 2009

          (245) (245)
              

    Balance as of December 31, 2010

     $ $ $ $ 
              

    Asset Impairment Charges

            During 2009, we recorded a $0.3 million asset impairment charge in the second quarter for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage reporting unit.

            During 2008, we recorded a $51.4 million asset impairment charge, of which $51.1 million was expended.recorded during the fourth quarter and $0.3 million was recorded during the first quarter. The fourth quarter charge consisted of $30.4 million related to goodwill, $19.6 million related to intangible assets ($5.0 million of indefinite-lived trademarks and $14.6 of other definite-lived intangibles) and $1.1 million in property, plant and equipment in Data Storage. The first quarter charge consisted of $0.3 million associated with property and equipment abandoned as part of the consolidation of our corporate headquarters into our Plainview facility.

    Minimum Lease Commitments

            Minimum lease commitments as of December 31, 20072010 for property and equipment under operating lease agreements (exclusive of renewal options) are payable as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

    2008 $6,062
    2009  5,033
    2010  2,276
    2011  1,321
    2012  582
    Thereafter  1,261
      
      $16,535
      

    2011

     $3,915 

    2012

      2,360 

    2013

      1,723 

    2014

      835 

    2015

      401 

    Thereafter

      230 
        

     $9,464 
        

            Rent charged to operations amounted to $5.3$2.3 million, $5.6$2.0 million and $5.7$2.5 million in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively. In addition, we are obligated under such leases for certain other expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance.

    Royalties

            We have arrangements with a number of third parties to use patents in accordance with license agreements. Royalties and license fees expensed under these agreements approximated $2.0 million, $1.5 million, and $1.5 million in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, and are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

    Environmental Remediation

            VeecoWe may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay up to $250,000 in connection with the implementation of a comprehensive plan of environmental remediation at our Plainview, New York facility. We have been indemnified by the former owner for any liabilities we may incur in excess of $250,000


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010


    $250,000 with respect to any such remediation and have a liability recorded for this amount as of December 31, 2007.2009. No comprehensive plan has been required to date. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any remediation plan that may be proposed.

            We are aware that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been detected in the soil at the site of a facility formerly leased by us in Santa Barbara, California. We have been indemnified for any liabilities we may incur which arise from environmental contamination at the site. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any such liabilities.


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007

            The former owner of the land and building in which our Santa Barbara, California in which our former Metrology operations arewere located, which business (sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010), has disclosed that there are hazardous substances present in the ground under the building. Management believes that the comprehensive indemnification clause that iswas part of the purchase contract relating to the purchase of such land provides adequate protection against any environmental issues that may arise. We have provided Bruker indemnification as part of the sale.

    Litigation

    In re Veeco Instruments Inc. Securities Litigation and Shareholder Derivative Litigation

            Veeco and certain of its officers were named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit consolidated in August 2005 in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit arises out of the restatement in March 2005 of our financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as a result of our discovery of certain improper accounting transactions at our TurboDisc business unit. On July 5, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve this lawsuit for a payment of $5.5 million. This settlement was approved by the court on November 7, 2007. Insurance proceeds covered the settlement amount and legal expenses related to the settlement after our payment of the insurance deductible. The settlement dismissed all pending claims against us and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by us or any of the other defendants, and Veeco and the other defendants received a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.

            In addition, three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in March and April of 2005. The plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action assert that our directors and certain of our officers breached fiduciary duties in connection with the improper accounting transactions at the TurboDisc business unit. On November 5, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve the consolidated shareholder derivative action, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the individual defendants, for a payment of approximately $0.5 million and for our agreement to adopt certain changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. We expect that insurance proceeds will cover the settlement amount and any significant legal expenses related to the settlement. On January 24, 2008, the Court gave preliminary approval of the proposed settlement. The settlement agreement is subject to final court approval and would dismiss all pending claims against us and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by us or any of the other defendants, and Veeco and the other defendants would receive a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.

    Patent Infringement

            On September 17, 2003, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Inc. ("Asylum"), a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees. The lawsuit alleges that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum's MFP-3D AFM constitutes willful infringement of five patents owned by us, as well as other claims. We are suing for unspecified monetary damages and a permanent injunction to stop infringement. Asylum has asserted that the patents we are suing on are invalid and unenforceable, and has filed a counterclaim for infringement of a patent licensed by Asylum, and payment of royalties it believes it is owed. The court held hearings on the summary judgment motions and referred many of the issues to a Special Master. On March 17, 2007 the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the cross motions for summary judgment. The court granted Asylum summary judgment for two of the five


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007


    patents, determining that Asylum did not infringe on Veeco's patents 5,266,801 ("801") and 5,415,027 ("027"). The court did not grant summary judgment to Veeco or Asylum for the other three patents, 5,224,376 ("376"), 5,237,859 ("859") and RE36,488 ("488"), and the lawsuit has proceeded with respect to those three patents. The costs of continuing to pursue this matter are significant and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this matter. Our policy is to capitalize legal costs incurred to defend our patents. We are currently amortizing the portion of these deferred legal costs associated with patents 801 and 027 over the remaining life of these patents, as these patents are valid and enforceable. All legal costs incurred subsequent to the summary judgment to defend the remaining patents have been allocated ratably to the three patents still in suit and have been capitalized. If we are not successful in defending the patents, these costs may need to be written down.

            We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

    Concentrations of Credit Risk

            Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of data storage and HB-LED/wireless manufacturers, scientific research and industrialour top ten customers, and semiconductor manufacturers, which accounted for the following percentages80% and 88% of our net sales:

     
     December 31,
     
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     
    Data Storage 34%42%41%
    HB-LED/wireless 28%20%15%
    Scientific Research and Industrial 29%25%27%
    Semiconductor 9%13%17%

            As oftotal accounts receivable at December 31, 2007, we had two2010 and 2009, respectively. Of such, HB LED and data storage customers whoseaccounted for approximately 62% and 18%, and 65% and 23%, respectively, of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

            Customers who accounted for more than 10% of our aggregate accounts receivable. Accounts receivable from Western Digital Corp. and Seagate Technology, Inc. accounted for 18% and 14%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. Sales to Western Digital and Seagate were 6% and 10%, respectively, ofor net sales for the year ended December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2006, we had two customers whose accounts receivable accounted for moreare as follows:

     
     Accounts Receivable
    December 31,
     Net Sales
    For the Year Ended
    December 31,
     
     
     2010 2009 2010 2009 2008 

    Customer A

      20% 43% 17% 27% * 

    Customer B

      26% *  *  *  * 

    Customer C

      *  *  12% *  * 

    Customer D

      *  14% *  10% 21%

    *
    Less than 10% of our aggregate accounts receivable. Accounts receivable from Seagate and Hitachi Ltd. accounted for 14% and 13%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. Sales to Seagate and Hitachi were 18% and 10%, respectively, ofor net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006.sales.

            Both of our operating segments sell to these major customers. No other customers' accounts receivable represented more than 10% of total accounts receivable in either period.

            We manufacture and sell our products to companies in different geographic locations. In certain instances, we require advanced deposits for a portion of the sales price in advance of shipment. However, the majority of system sales do not require such advance payments. We do, however, perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition and, where appropriate, require that letters of credit be provided on foreign sales. Receivables generally are due within 30-60 days, other


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010


    letters of credit be provided on certain foreign sales arrangements. Receivables generally are due within 30-60 days, other than receivables generated from customers in Japan where payment terms generally range from 90-15060-90 days. Our net accounts receivable arebalance is concentrated in the following geographic locations (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     December 31,
     
     2007
     2006
    North America $19,665 $25,353
    Europe  19,384  17,818
    Japan  14,865  20,648
    Asia Pacific  21,192  22,682
    Other  101  88
      
     
      $75,207 $86,589
      
     

     
     December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 

    Americas

     $13,600 $15,696 

    Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA")

      17,321  10,367 

    Asia Pacific(1)

      119,607  41,483 
          

     $150,528 $67,546 
          

    (1)
    As of December 31, 2010, accounts receivable in China and Singapore amounted to $66.5 million and $48.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, accounts receivable in Singapore amounted to $34.0 million. No other country accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable as of December 31 for the years presented.

    Suppliers

            We currently outsource, and plan to increasecontinue the outsourcing of, certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, data storage systems, solar deposition systems and ion beam systems recently introduced by our Process Equipment group. At present, wesources. We primarily rely primarily on a sole supplierseveral suppliers for the majority of the manufacturemanufacturing of these MOCVD and ion beam systems. We plan to maintain internal manufacturing capability for these systems at least until such time as we have qualified one or more alternate suppliers to perform this manufacturing. The failure of this supplierour present suppliers to meet itstheir contractual obligations under our supply arrangementarrangements and our inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and relationships with our customers.

            In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.


    8.Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

    11. Foreign Operations, Geographic Area, and Product Segment Information

            Net sales which are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer facility is located and long-lived assets related to operations in North Americathe United States and other foreign countries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008 are as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

     
     Net Sales to Unaffiliated Customers
     Long-Lived Assets
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
     2007
     2006
     2005
    United States $127,884 $145,464 $136,241 $225,395 $242,056 $250,786
    Canada and Mexico  2,616  6,222  6,763      
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total North America  130,500  151,686  143,004  225,395  242,056  250,786

    Europe

     

     

    77,985

     

     

    69,310

     

     

    81,476

     

     

    603

     

     

    613

     

     

    737
    Japan  55,815  57,241  66,500  250  193  197
    Asia Pacific  138,175  162,797  119,210  439  451  383
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total Other Foreign Countries  271,975  289,348  267,186  1,292  1,257  1,317
      
     
     
     
     
     
      $402,475 $441,034 $410,190 $226,687 $243,313 $252,103
      
     
     
     
     
     

     
     Net Sales to Unaffiliated Customers Long-Lived Assets 
     
     2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 

    United States

     $94,753 $60,553 $130,088 $123,543 $117,350 $124,480 

    Other

      232  177  485       
                  
     

    Total Americas

      94,985  60,730  130,573  123,543  117,350  124,480 

    EMEA(1)

      
    92,112
      
    50,088
      
    57,567
      
    274
      
    315
      
    413
     

    Asia Pacific(1)

      746,134  171,594  126,795  974  815  706 
                  
     

    Total Other Foreign Countries

      838,246  221,682  184,362  1,248  1,130  1,119 
                  

     $933,231 $282,412 $314,935 $124,791 $118,480 $125,599 
                  

    (1)
    For the year ended December 31, 2010, net sales to customers in South Korea, China and Taiwan were 32.3%, 28.6% and 10.8% of total net sales, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2009, net sales to customers in South Korea and China were 35.1% and 11.0% of total net sales, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, net sales to customers in Germany and Taiwan were 10.3% and 12.4% of total net sales, respectively. No other country in EMEA and Asia Pacific accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the years presented.

            We manage the business, review operating results and assess performance, as well as allocate resources, based upon two separate reporting segments. The Process Equipment segment combines the


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2007


    IBE, IBD, diamond like carbon, physical vapor deposition, dicing and slicing products sold mostly to data storage customers and the MBE and MOCVD products primarily sold to high-brightness light emitting diode, solar, and wireless customers. This segment has production facilities in Plainview, New York, Ft. Collins, Colorado, Camarillo, California, St. Paul, Minnesota and Somerset, New Jersey. The Metrology segment represents productssegments that are used to provide critical surface measurements on items such as semiconductor devices and TFMHs, as well as biological, nanoscience, and material science samples, and includes our broad line of atomic force microscopes, optical interferometers and stylus profilers sold to semiconductor customers, data storage customers and thousands of research facilities and scientific centers. This segment has production facilities in Camarillo and Santa Barbara, California and Tucson, Arizona.

            Beginning in 2008, we will manage our business based on three reporting segments to more accurately reflect the market focus of each business. The current Process EquipmentLight Emitting Diode ("LED") & Solar segment will be divided intoconsists of metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, thermal deposition sources, and other types of deposition systems used to deposit materials on flexible and glass substrates. These systems are primarily sold to customers in the high-brightness light emitting diode ("HB LED") and solar industries, as well as to scientific research customers. This segment has product development and marketing sites in Somerset, New Jersey, St. Paul, Minnesota, Lowell, Massachusetts and Clifton Park, New York. The Data Storage Process Equipment, which will consistsegment consists of the IBE, IBD, diamond likeion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing products sold primarily to customers in the data storage customers,industry. This segment has product development and LED/Solar Process Equipment, which will consist of MBEmarketing sites in Plainview, New York, Ft. Collins, Colorado and MOCVD products, sold primarily to HB-LED, solar, and wireless customers. We will continue to report our Metrology segment in the same manner as we have historically. This change was made based upon the chief operating decision maker's view that the business segments should coincide more precisely with the markets in which they sell their products.Camarillo, California.

            We evaluate the performance of our reportable segments based on income (loss) from operations before interest, income taxes, amortization and certain items ("EBITA"segment profit (loss)"), which is the primary indicator used to plan and forecast future periods. The presentation of this financial measure facilitates meaningful comparison with prior periods, as management believes EBITAsegment profit (loss) reports baseline performance and thus provides useful information. Certain items include charges for purchased in-process technology, restructuring andexpenses, asset impairment charges, inventory write-offs, equity-based compensation expense and debt-related costs or gains.other non-recurring items. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of critical accounting policies.


    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 2010

            The following tables present certain data pertaining to our reportable product segments and a reconciliation of EBITAsegment profit (loss) to income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes and noncontrolling interest for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and goodwill and total assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

     
     LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
    Corporate
     Total 

    Year ended December 31, 2010

                 

    Net sales

     $797,904 $135,327 $ $933,231 
              

    Segment profit (loss)

     $276,060 $34,534 $(18,674)$291,920 

    Interest expense, net

          6,572  6,572 

    Amortization expense

      3,121  1,522  233  4,876 

    Equity-based compensation expense

      2,643  1,140  5,865  9,648 

    Restructuring credit

        (179)   (179)
              

    Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes

     $270,296 $32,051 $(31,344)$271,003 
              

    Year ended December 31, 2009

                 

    Net sales

     $205,153 $77,259 $ $282,412 
              

    Segment profit (loss)

     $27,826 $(2,578)$(10,598)$14,650 

    Interest expense, net

          6,850  6,850 

    Amortization expense

      3,137  1,599  432  5,168 

    Equity-based compensation expense

      1,358  1,020  5,169  7,547 

    Restructuring expense

      1,196  3,006  635  4,837 

    Asset impairment charge

        304    304 

    Inventory write-offs

        1,526    1,526 
              

    Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes

     $22,135 $(10,033)$(23,684)$(11,582)
              

    Year ended December 31, 2008

                 

    Net sales

     $165,812 $149,123 $ $314,935 
              

    Segment profit (loss)

     $23,913 $16,986 $(9,221)$31,678 

    Interest expense, net

          6,729  6,729 

    Amortization expense

      4,627  3,790  448  8,865 

    Equity-based compensation expense

      495  990  5,165  6,650 

    Restructuring expense

      732  396  8,296  9,424 

    Asset impairment charges

        51,102  285  51,387 

    Purchase accounting adjustment

      1,492      1,492 

    Gain on extinguishment of debt

          (3,758) (3,758)
              

    Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes

     $16,567 $(39,292)$(26,386)$(49,111)
              

    Table of Contents


    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

    December 31, 20072010


    ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, and goodwill and

     
     LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
    Corporate
     Total 

    As of December 31, 2010

                 

    Goodwill

     $52,003 $ $ $52,003 

    Total assets

     $323,096 $61,691 $763,247 $1,148,034 

    As of December 31, 2009

                 

    Goodwill

     $52,003 $ $ $52,003 

    Total assets

     $178,420 $54,106 $372,846 $605,372 

            Corporate total assets are comprised principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash as of December 31, 20072010 and 2006 (in thousands):

     
     Process Equipment
     Metrology
     Unallocated Corporate Amount
     Total
     
    Year ended December 31, 2007             
    Net sales $252,032 $150,443 $ $402,475 
      
     
     
     
     
    Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA) $19,852 $2,441 $(11,489)$10,804 
    Interest expense, net      3,013  3,013 
    Amortization expense  8,069  1,486  695  10,250 
    Restructuring expense  2,532  1,231  2,963  6,726 
    Asset impairment charges  1,068      1,068 
    Inventory write-offs  4,821      4,821 
    Gain on extinguishment of debt      (738) (738)
      
     
     
     
     
    Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest $3,362 $(276)$(17,422)$(14,336)
      
     
     
     
     
    Year ended December 31, 2006             
    Net sales $268,878 $172,156 $ $441,034 
      
     
     
     
     
    Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA) $28,444 $23,281 $(12,064)$39,661 
    Interest expense, net      4,268  4,268 
    Amortization expense  13,180  1,815  1,050  16,045 
    Write-off of purchased in-process technology  1,160      1,160 
    Gain on extinguishment of debt      (330) (330)
      
     
     
     
     
    Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest $14,104 $21,466 $(17,052)$18,518 
      
     
     
     
     
    Year ended December 31, 2005             
    Net sales $227,861 $182,329 $ $410,190 
      
     
     
     
     
    Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA) $4,326 $35,001 $(10,513)$28,814 
    Interest expense, net      7,568  7,568 
    Amortization expense  13,471  1,953  1,159  16,583 
    Restructuring expense      1,165  1,165 
      
     
     
     
     
    (Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest $(9,145)$33,048 $(20,405)$3,498 
      
     
     
     
     
    As of December 31, 2007             
    Goodwill $71,530 $29,368 $ $100,898 
    Total assets  266,270  121,060  142,004  529,334 

    As of December 31, 2006

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
    Goodwill $71,530 $29,368 $ $100,898 
    Total assets  285,661  138,140  165,799  589,600 

    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries2009.

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)        Other Segment Data (

    December 31, 2007

    Other Significant Items (in thousands)in thousands):

     
     Year ended December 31,
     
     2007
     2006
     2005
    Depreciation and amortization expense:         
     Process Equipment $15,966 $21,935 $22,328
     Metrology  6,618  5,597  4,959
     Unallocated Corporate  2,407  2,548  2,524
      
     
     
     Total depreciation and amortization expense $24,991 $30,080 $29,811
      
     
     
    Expenditures for long-lived assets:         
     Process Equipment $5,464 $8,096 $6,935
     Metrology  1,682  7,146  3,259
     Unallocated Corporate  1,946  2,159  1,482
      
     
     
     Total expenditures for long-lived assets $9,092 $17,401 $11,676
      
     
     

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2010 2009 2008 

    Depreciation and amortization expense:

              
     

    LED & Solar

     $7,573 $7,392 $7,850 
     

    Data Storage

      3,582  4,448  7,690 
     

    Unallocated Corporate

      1,699  2,025  2,145 
            
     

    Total depreciation and amortization expense

     $12,854 $13,865 $17,685 
            

    Expenditures for long-lived assets:

              
     

    LED & Solar

     $8,086 $6,656 $5,605 
     

    Data Storage

      572  192  4,256 
     

    Unallocated Corporate

      2,066  612  1,265 
            
     

    Total expenditures for long-lived assets

     $10,724 $7,460 $11,126 
            

    9.12. Defined Contribution Benefit Plan

            We maintain a defined contribution benefit plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Almost all of our domestic full-time employees are eligible to participate in this plan. Under the plan, we provide matching contributions of fifty cents for every dollar employees contribute up to a maximum of the lesser of 6% of an employee's eligible compensation or $2,500. The plan also allows the Board of Directors to determine annual discretionary profit sharing contributions at each plan year-end.$3,000. Generally, the plan calls for vesting of Company contributions over the initial five years of a participant's employment. Beginning in 2007, we maintained a similar type of contribution plan at one of our foreign subsidiaries.

    Our contributions to these plans in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009 and 20052008 were $1.7 million, $1.8 million, $1.0 million and $1.6$1.4 million, respectively.

    13. Cost Method Investment

            On September 28, 2010, Veeco completed an investment in a rapidly developing organic light emitting diode (OLED) equipment company. Veeco has invested in this company's Round B funding extension totaling $3 million, resulting in 7.8% ownership of the preferred shares, and 5.6% ownership of the company. Since we do not exhibit significant influence on such company, this investment is treated under the cost method in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. The fair value of this investment is not estimated because there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment, and we are exempt from estimating interim fair values because the investment does not meet the definition of a publicly traded company. This investment is recorded in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010.


    Table of Contents


    Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (in(in thousands)

    COL. A

     COL. B
     COL. C
     COL. D
     COL. E
     
      
     Additions
      
      
    Description

     Balance at Beginning of Period
     Charged to Costs and Expenses
     Charged to Other Accounts
     Deductions
     Balance at End of Period
    Deducted from asset accounts:               
     Year ended December 31, 2007:               
      Allowance for doubtful accounts $2,683 $(1,070)$ $(629)$984
      Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets  67,770  11,414    (5,892) 73,292
      
     
     
     
     
      $70,453 $10,344 $ $(6,521)$74,276
      
     
     
     
     
    Deducted from asset accounts:               
     Year ended December 31, 2006:               
      Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,860 $322 $527 $(26)$2,683
      Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets(1)  69,982  (2,212)     67,770
      
     
     
     
     
      $71,842 $(1,890)$527 $(26)$70,453
      
     
     
     
     
    Deducted from asset accounts:               
     Year ended December 31, 2005:               
      Allowance for doubtful accounts(1) $2,420 $(150)$ $(410)$1,860
      Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets(1)  62,812  7,170      69,982
      
     
     
     
     
      $65,232 $7,020 $ $(410)$71,842
      
     
     
     
     

    (1)
    The prior period has been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

    COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E 
     
      
     Additions  
      
     
    Description Balance at
    Beginning of
    Period
     Charged to
    Costs and
    Expenses
     Charged to
    Other
    Accounts
     Deductions Balance at
    End of
    Period
     

    Deducted from asset accounts:

                    
     

    Year ended December 31, 2010:

                    
      

    Allowance for doubtful accounts

     $438 $40 $34 $ $512 
      

    Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

      84,723    (2,663) (80,416) 1,644 
                

     $85,161 $40 $(2,629)$(80,416)$2,156 
                

    Deducted from asset accounts:

                    
     

    Year ended December 31, 2009:

                    
      

    Allowance for doubtful accounts

     $583 $(52)$ $(93)$438 
      

    Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

      78,706  6,017      84,723 
                

     $79,289 $5,965 $ $(93)$85,161 
                

    Deducted from asset accounts:

                    
     

    Year ended December 31, 2008:

                    
      

    Allowance for doubtful accounts

     $641 $(67)$9 $ $583 
      

    Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

      67,360  14,150  317  (3,121) 78,706 
                

     $68,001 $14,083 $326 $(3,121)$79,289 
                


    INDEX TO EXHIBITS

            Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

    Number

     Exhibit
     Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    2.1Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 15, 2010 among Veeco Instruments Inc. (Veeco), Veeco Metrology Inc. and Bruker CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Exhibit 2.1
    3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the CompanyVeeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 3.1
    3.2 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 3.2
    3.3 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.1
    3.4 Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, Exhibit 3.1
    3.5 ThirdAmendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Exhibit 3.1
    3.6Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010Filed herewith
    3.7Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company,Veeco, effective October 26, 2000.23, 2008 Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-8 (File8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1
    3.8Amendment No. 333-49476),1 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective May 20, 2010Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 7, 2000,May 26, 2010, Exhibit 4.33.1
    4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Rights Agent, including the form of the Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights setting forth the terms of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Exhibit A, the form of Rights Certificates as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C. Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated March 15, 2001, Exhibit 1
    4.2 Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 21, 2001, Exhibit 4.1
    4.3 Amendment No 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2002, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002, Exhibit 4.1

    4.4
    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
     Indenture between Veeco and State Street Bank and Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, dated December 21, 2001, relating to the 41/8% convertible subordinated notes due 2008.Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-84252), filed March 13, 2002, Exhibit 4.1
    4.5Form of Note/Indenture relating to Debt Securities which may be offered on a delayed or continuous basis.Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128004), filed September 28, 2005, Exhibit 4.1
    4.64.4 Indenture, dated April 16, 2007, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank National Trust.Trust Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 To Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128004) filed April 16, 2007, Exhibit 4.1

    4.74.5 First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 20, 2007, by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee.Trustee Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 20, 2007, Exhibit 4.1
    10.1Credit Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2007, by and among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
    10.2First Amendment dated as of February 25, 2008 to the Credit Agreement dated August 20, 2007 among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Filed herewith
    10.3Amendment and Reaffirmation dated August 20, 2007 of Security Agreement dated as of March 15, 2005 among Veeco Instruments Inc., the subsidiaries of Veeco named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.2
    10.4 Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.2
    10.510.2 Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002). Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.2
    10.610.3 Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.3
    10.710.4*Form of ExchangeIndemnification Agreement dated April 16, 2007 relating to the exchangeentered into between Veeco and each of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 21, 2008 for 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due April 15, 2012.its directors and executive officers. Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 20, 2007,on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
    10.8*10.5*Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-93958), Exhibit 10.20
    10.9*10.6*Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.1
    10.1010.7*Amendment dated July 25, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.2
    10.1110.8*Amendment dated May 29, 1998 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.1

    10.1210.9*Amendment dated May 14, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.2
    10.1310.10*Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-85184), Exhibit 10.17
    10.14*Amendment dated May 15, 1996 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08981) filed July 26, 1996, Exhibit 10.2
    10.15*Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.3
    10.16*Amendment dated May 21, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.3
    10.17*Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.4
    10.1810.11*Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
    10.1910.12*Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.41
    10.13*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005.2005 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3

    10.20*Form of Directors Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant
    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 2006.Following Documents
     Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
    10.2110.14*Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006.2006 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3
    10.2210.15*Veeco Instruments Inc. 20002010 Stock OptionIncentive Plan, for Non-Officer Employees.effective May 14, 2010 Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-49476)333-166852) filed November 7, 2000,May 14, 2010, Exhibit 4.410.1
    10.2310.16*Amendment No. 1 to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees, effective dated July 26, 2001.Agreement Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-66574)333-166852) filed August 2, 2001,May 14, 2010, Exhibit 4.210.2
    10.2410.17*Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock AgreementRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-166852) filed May 14, 2010, Exhibit 10.3
    10.18*Veeco Instruments Inc. 2006 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan.Performance-Based Restricted Stock 2010 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,2010, Exhibit 10.110.2
    10.2510.19*Employment agreementVeeco 2010 Management Bonus Plan dated January 22, 2010Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.2
    10.20*Veeco 2010 Special Profit Sharing Plan dated February 15, 2010Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.3
    10.21*Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of April 27, 2007September 12, 2008Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3
    10.22*Amendment No. 1 dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Senior Executive Change in Control PolicyAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.37
    10.23*Service Agreement effective July 24, 2008 between Veeco and Edward H. Braun and Veeco Instruments Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007,2008, Exhibit 10.210.1
    10.2610.24*Employment agreementAgreement effective as of July 1, 2007 between Veeco and John R. Peeler and Veeco Instruments Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.3

    10.2710.25*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2003 between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.R. PeelerAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.38
    10.26*Second Amendment effective June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and Veeco Instruments Inc.John R. Peeler Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,2010, Exhibit 10.510.1
    10.2810.27*Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement of John F. Rein, Jr., effective June 9, 2006.dated December 17, 2009 (effective January 18, 2010) between Veeco and David D. Glass Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.210.1
    10.2910.28*Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between the CompanyVeeco and John P. Kiernan. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38
    10.29*Form of Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan and Robert P. OatesQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

    NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
    10.30*Form of Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan, Mark R. Munch and Robert P. OatesAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.40
    10.31*Letter agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. KiernanQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Exhibit 10.2
    10.32*Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco Instruments Inc., and Robert P. Oates.Oates Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.1
    10.3110.33*Form of Amendment dated September 12, 2008 to Letter Agreements of John P. KiernanEmployment Agreement between Veeco and Robert P. OatesQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.2
    10.34*Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2003 between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, Exhibit 10.5
    10.35*Amendment effective June 9, 2006.2006 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.310.2
    10.3210.36*LetterAmendment dated as of September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement dated October 15, 2007 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and William A. Tomeo.John F. Rein, Jr. Filed herewithQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1
    10.3310.37*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.39
    10.38*Letter Agreement dated January 11, 2008 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Mark R. Munch.Munch Filed herewith
    10.34*Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco Instruments Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.CurrentAnnual Report on Form 8-K filed10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.33
    10.39*Letter Agreement dated September 23, 2010 between Veeco and Mark R. MunchQuarterly Report on October 23, 2006,Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1
    21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Filed herewith
    23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. Filed herewith
    31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith
    31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith
    32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002 Filed herewith
    32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002 Filed herewith

    *
    Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a) (3) of Form 10-K.



    QuickLinks

    SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
    PART II
    COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
    ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 2002 ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31
    PART III
    PART IV
    SIGNATURES
    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule
    MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements
    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in thousands)
    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations (In thousands, except per share data)
    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Dollars in thousands)
    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands)
    Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2007
    Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (in thousands)
    INDEX TO EXHIBITS