UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ýþ Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
2011
OR
o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission file number 001-13913
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 51-0261715 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6300 Lamar Avenue
Overland Park, Kansas 66202
913-236-2000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number of Registrant's principal executive offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value | New York Stock Exchange |
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YESýþ NOo
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YESo NOýþ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesýþ Noo.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YesþNoo.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated Filer | Accelerated Filer | o | ||||
Non-accelerated Filer | o | Smaller Reporting Company | o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noýþ.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock equity held by non-affiliates (i.e.(i.e. persons other than officers, directors and stockholders holding greater than 5% of the registrant's common stock) based on the closing sale price on June 30, 20082011 was $2.784$2.624 billion.
Shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of February 20, 200916, 2012 Class A common stock, $.01 par value: 84,930,48485,586,796
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
In Part III of this Form 10-K, portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 8, 2009.18, 2012.
Index of Exhibits (Pages 84 through 89)
Total Number of Pages Included Are 89
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082011
Part I | | Page | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Item 1. | Business | 3 | ||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | |||
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | |||
Item 2. | Properties | |||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | |||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | |||
Part II | ||||
Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | |||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | |||
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | |||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | |||
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | |||
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | |||
Item 9B. | Other Information | |||
Part III | ||||
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | |||
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | |||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | |||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | |||
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | |||
Part IV | ||||
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | |||
SIGNATURES | ||||
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||||
INDEX TO EXHIBITS | 84 |
General
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company," "we," "our" or "us") is a corporation, incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1981, that conducts business through its subsidiaries. Founded in 1937, we are one of the oldest mutual fund complexes in the United States, having introduced the Waddell & Reed Advisors Group of Mutual Funds (the "Advisors Funds") in 1940. We launched ourOver time we added additional mutual fund families: Ivy Funds in 2003 in an effort to expand(the "Ivy Funds"), Ivy Funds Variable Insurance Portfolios ("Ivy Funds VIP") and InvestEd Portfolios, our distribution to third-party outlets.529 college savings plan ("InvestEd"). As of December 31, 2008,2011, we had $47.5$83.2 billion in assets under management and approximately 3.7 million mutual fund shareholder accounts owned by individuals, plans or omnibus accounts at third parties.management.
We derive our revenues primarily from providing investment management, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration to mutual funds and institutional and separately managed accounts. Investment management fees are based on the amount of average assets under management and are affected by sales levels, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. Our underwriting and distribution revenues consist of commissions derived from sales of investment and insurance products, Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees, distribution fees on certain variable products, fees earned on fee-based asset allocation products, and related advisory services. The products sold have various commission structures and the revenues received from those sales vary based on the type and amount sold. Shareholder service fees revenue includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, and portfolio accounting and administration fees, and is earned based on assets under management or number of client accounts.
We operate our business through three distinct distribution channels. Our retail products are distributed through our sales force of registeredindependent financial advisors (the "Advisors channel") or through third-parties such as other broker/dealers, registered investment advisors (including the retirement advisors of the Legend group of subsidiaries ("Legend")) and various retirement platforms, (collectively, the "Wholesale channel"). We also market our investment advisory services to institutional investors, either directly or through consultants (the "Institutional channel").
In the Advisors channel, our sales force focuses its efforts primarily on the sale of investment products advised by the Company.financial planning, serving primarily middle class and mass affluent clients. We compete primarily with smaller broker/dealers and independent financial advisors, as well as a span of other financial service providers. Assets under management acquired throughin this channel were $23.5$31.7 billion at December 31, 2008.2011.
Our Wholesale channel efforts include retail fund distribution through broker/dealers (the largest method of distributing mutual funds for the industry), registered investment advisors (fee-based financial advisors who generally sell mutual funds through financial supermarkets) and retirement platforms (401(k) platforms using multiple managers).and insurance platforms. Assets under management acquired throughin this channel were $17.5$41.0 billion at the end of 2008.2011.
Through our Institutional channel, we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for defined benefit pension plans, other investment companies (as a subadvisor), defined contribution plans, endowments and high net worth clients.variety of types of institutions. The largest client type is funds that hire us to act as subadvisor; they are typically distributors who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market multi-manager styles. Assets under management acquired throughin the Institutional channel were $6.5$10.5 billion at December 31, 2008.2011.
Organization
We operate our investment advisory business through our subsidiary companies, primarily Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company ("WRIMCO"), a registered investment adviser, and Ivy Investment Management Company ("IICO"), the registered investment adviser for Ivy Funds Inc. and the Ivy Funds portfolios (collectively, the "Ivy Funds"). Other investment advisory subsidiaries include Legend Advisory Corporation, (thethe registered investment adviser for Legend) and Austin, Calvert & Flavin, Inc. ("ACF").
Table of ContentsLegend.
Our underwriting and distribution business operates through three broker/dealers: Waddell & Reed, Inc. ("W&R"), Ivy Funds Distributor, Inc. ("IFDI") and Legend Equities Corporation ("LEC").
W&R is a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser that acts primarily as the national distributor and underwriter for shares of the Advisors Funds, other mutual funds and a distributor of variable annuities and other insurance products issued by Nationwide Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. ("Nationwide"), Minnesota Life Insurance Company ("Minnesota Life"), a subsidiary of Securian Financial Group, Inc. ("Securian"), and others.our business partners. In addition, W&R is the tentheighth largest distributor of our Ivy Funds. IFDI, a registered broker/dealer, is the distributor and underwriter for the Ivy Funds. LEC is the registered broker/dealer for Legend, a mutual fund distribution and retirement planning subsidiary based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Through its network of financial advisors, Legend primarily serves employees of school districts and other not-for-profit organizations.
Waddell & Reed Services Company ("WRSCO") provides transfer agency and accounting services to the Advisors Funds, the Ivy Funds, Ivy Funds Variable Insurance Porfolios, Inc. (the "Ivy Funds VIP") (renamed from W&R Target Funds, Inc. in 2008)VIP and Waddell & Reed InvestEd Portfolios, Inc., our college savings plan ("InvestEd").InvestEd. W&R, WRIMCO, WRSCO, ACF, Legend, IICO and IFDI are hereafter collectively referred to as the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" unless the context requires otherwise.
Investment Management Operations
Our investment advisory business provides one of our largest sources of revenues and profits. We earn investment management fee revenues by providing investment advisory and management services pursuant to an investment management agreementagreements with each fund within the Advisors Funds family, the Ivy Funds families,family, the Ivy Funds VIP family, and InvestEd (collectively, the "Funds"). While the specific terms of the agreements vary, the basic terms are similar. The agreements provide that we render overall investment management services to each of the Funds, subject to the oversight of each Fund's board of directors/trustees and in accordance with each Fund's investment objectives and policies. The agreements permit us to enter into separate agreements for shareholder services or accounting services with each respective Fund.
Each Fund's board of directors/trustees, including a majority of the directors/trustees who are not "interested persons" of the Fund or the Company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "ICA") ("disinterested members") and the Fund's shareholders must approve the investment management agreement between the respective Fund and the Company. These agreements may continue in effect from year to year if specifically approved at least annually by (i) the Fund's board, including a majority of the disinterested members, or (ii) the vote of a majority of both the shareholders of the Fund and the disinterested members of each Fund's board, each vote being cast in person at a meeting called for such purpose. Each agreement automatically terminates in the event of its assignment, as defined by the ICA or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, (the "Advisers Act"), and may be terminated without penalty by any Fund by giving us 60 days' written notice if the termination has been approved by a majority of the Fund's directors/trustees or the Fund's shareholders. We may terminate an investment management agreement without penalty on 120 days' written notice.
In addition to performing investment management services for the Funds, we act as an investment adviser for institutional and other private investors and we provide subadvisory services to other investment companies. Our fee for these services is generally based on a percentage of assets under management. Such services are provided pursuant to various written agreements.
Our investment management effort hasteam meets every morning in a strong foundation based uponcollaborative setting that fosters idea sharing, yet reinforces individual accountability. Through all market cycles, we remain dedicated to the following investment principles:
companies in which These three principles shape our investment philosophy and money management approach. Over seven decades, our investment organization has delivered consistently competitive investment performance. Through bull and bear markets, our investment professionals have not strayed from what works — a time-tested investment process and fundamental research. We believe investors turn to us because they invest. With a relatively concentratedappreciate that our investment base, the team knows the portfolio holdings insideapproach continues to identify and out and manages them with insight and confidence. In addition, we use research provided by brokerage firms and independent outside consultants. Portfolio managers participate in a collaborative process that blends their individual accountability with the ideas of their peers which, when backed by an intensive research capability, supports our efforts to deliver consistent, long-term performance.create opportunities for wealth creation.
Our investment management team also includes a premier groupcomprises 77 professionals including 30 portfolio managers who average 21 years of subadvisors who bring similar investment philosophiesindustry experience and additional expertise in specific asset classes.
15 years of tenure with our firm. We have significant experience in virtually all major asset classes, several specialized asset classes and a range of investment styles. Our endingAt December 31, 2011, over 80% of the Company's $83.2 billion in assets under management are summarized below by broad asset class, manywere invested in equities, of which incorporate multiple73% was domestic and 27% was international. In recent years, we have supported growth of international investments by adding investment styles.
Ending Assets Under Management by Broad Asset Class
| December 31, 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ending Assets | Percentage of Total | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
Investment Style: | |||||||||
Balanced & Flexible | $ | 14,815 | 31% | ||||||
Large Capitalization Growth Equities | 6,530 | 14% | |||||||
Narrowly Diversified | 5,624 | 12% | |||||||
Large Capitalization Core Equities | 4,409 | 9% | |||||||
Taxable Investment Grade Fixed Income | 3,583 | 8% | |||||||
International Equities | 2,637 | 6% | |||||||
Small Capitalization Growth Equities | 2,193 | 5% | |||||||
Money Market | 2,065 | 4% | |||||||
Value Equities | 1,409 | 3% | |||||||
Multi-Capitalization Core Equities | 1,182 | 2% | |||||||
High Yield Fixed Income | 1,087 | 2% | |||||||
Middle Capitalization Growth Equities | 935 | 2% | |||||||
Tax Exempt Fixed Income | 958 | 2% | |||||||
International Fixed Income | 57 | 0% | |||||||
Total | $ | 47,484 | 100% | ||||||
professionals native to countries that we consider emerging markets. They, along with other members of the investment team, focus on understanding foreign markets and capturing investment opportunities. Our investment strategy generally emphasizes investmentsmanagement team also includes subadvisors who bring similar investment philosophies and additional expertise in companies that the portfolio managers believe can produce above average growth in earnings. Our portfolio managers also strive for consistent long-term performance while seeking to provide downside protection in turbulent markets like those experienced in the second half of 2008. Our investment philosophy lends itself well to the financial planning approach used by our Advisors channel while our consistent long-term investment performance record supports the distribution efforts in both our Wholesale and Institutional channels.specific asset classes.
Investment Management Products
Our mutual fund families offer a wide variety of investment options. We are the exclusive underwriter and distributor of 7880 registered open-end mutual fund portfolios, including 21 portfolioswhich include offerings in the Advisors Funds, family, 29 portfolios in the Ivy Funds, family, 25 portfolios in the Ivy Funds VIP family and three portfolios in InvestEd. The Advisors Funds, variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP, and InvestEd are offered primarily through our financial advisors and Legend advisors; in some circumstances, certain of these funds are also offered through the Wholesale channel. The Ivy Funds are offered through both our Advisors channel and Wholesale channel. The Funds' assets under management are included in either our Advisors channel or our Wholesale channel depending on whowhich channel marketed the client account or is the broker of record.
We added one fund and five managed fund-of-funds portfolios to our product line during 2008. We launched the Ivy Global Bond fund for investors seeking a high level of current income generated from a diversified portfolio consisting of fixed-income securities of domestic and foreign issuers. We added the fund-of-funds portfolios to the Ivy Funds VIP family to help investors achieve financial objectives through a professionally developed asset allocation program and to maximize long-term total returns at a given level of risk through broad diversification among several traditional asset classes.
Other Products
Pursuant to general agency arrangements with Nationwide and Minnesota Life,In our Advisors channel, we distribute certain of theirvarious business partners' variable annuity products, which offer the Ivy Funds VIP as an investment vehicle. We also offer our Advisors channel customers retirement and life insurance products underwritten by Nationwide and Minnesota Life.our business partners. Through our insurance agency subsidiaries, ourWaddell & Reed financial advisors also sell life insurance and disability products underwritten by various carriers through a general agency arrangement with BISYS Insurance Services, Inc.carriers.
In addition, we offer our Advisors channel customers fee-based asset allocation investment advisory products, including Managed Allocation Portfolio ("MAP"), MAPPlus and Strategic Portfolio Allocation ("SPA"), which utilize our Funds. MAP includes two mutual fund asset allocation programs, MAP and MAP Plus, that offer clients a selection of traditional asset allocation models, as well as features such as systematic rebalancing and client participation in determining (to a limited extent) asset allocation across asset classes. MAP and MAP Plus are fee-based mutual fund asset allocation programs, structured to provide advisors and clients with advisory services, a pricing option competitive with other firms' fee-based products, and flexibility to allow advisors to assist clients in selecting underlying funds based upon their individual needs. MAP Plus was introduced in 2007 along with a reintroduction of MAP, to include additional financial planning modules as a bundled offering. As of December 31, 2008,2011, clients have $1.4$6.0 billion invested in our MAP, MAPPlus and MAP PlusSPA products. These assets are included in our mutual fund assets under management.
Using a variety of funds ranging from money market and fixed income funds to domestic and international equity funds, SPA is a predictive, dynamic asset allocation system that reallocates asset classes within model portfolios. Clients investing assets in SPA can choose from five available model portfolios with objectives ranging from conservative to aggressive, based on their investment objectives, goals, risk tolerance and other factors. Clients have $224 million invested in our SPA products as of December 31, 2008 and these assets are included in our mutual fund assets under management.
A primary difference between MAP and SPA is that advisors assist clients in selecting the underlying mutual funds within MAP models in accordance with pre-established ranges, whereas for SPA, the Company's Investment Policy Committee determines the model compositions.
Underwriting and Distribution
We earn underwriting and distribution fee revenues primarily by distributing the Funds pursuant to an underwriting agreement with each Fund (except the Ivy Funds VIP as explained below) and, to a lesser extent, by distributing mutual funds offered by other companies not affiliated with us. Pursuant to each agreement, we offer and sell the Funds' shares on a continuous basis (open-end funds) and pay certain costs associated with underwriting and distributing the Funds, including the costs of developing and producing sales literature and printing of prospectuses, which may be either partially or fully reimbursed by the Funds. The Funds are sold in various classes that are structured in ways that conform to industry standards (i.e., "front-end load," "back-end load," "level-load" and institutional).
When a client purchases Class A shares (front-end load), the client pays an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested. The sales charge for Class A shares typically declines as the investment amount increases. In addition, investors may combine their purchases of all fund shares to qualify for a reduced sales charge. Class A shares purchased at net asset value are assessed a 1% contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") if the shares are redeemed within 12 months of purchase. When a client purchases
Class B shares (back-end load), we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge a CDSC upon early redemption of shares, up to 5% of the lesser of the current market net asset value or the purchase cost of the redeemed shares in the first year and declining to zero for shares held for more than six years. Class B shares convert to Class A shares after seven years. When a client purchases Class C shares (level-load), we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge investors who redeem their Class C shares in the first year a CDSC of 1% of the current market net asset value or the purchase cost of the shares redeemed, whichever is less.
Under a Rule 12b-1 service plan, the Funds may charge a maximum fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets under management for expenses paid to broker/dealers and other sales professionals in connection with providing ongoing services to the Funds' shareholders and/or maintaining the Funds' shareholder accounts. The Funds' Class B and Class C shares may charge a maximum of 0.75% of the average daily net assets under management under a Rule 12b-1 distribution plan to broker/dealers and other sales professionals for their services in connection with distributing shares of that class. The Rule 12b-1 plans are subject to annual approval by the Funds' board of directors/trustees, including a majority of the disinterested members, by votes cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. All Funds may terminate the service plan at any time with approval of fund directors or portfolio shareholders (a majority of either) without penalty.
We distribute variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP as investment vehicles pursuant to general agency arrangements with Nationwide and Minnesota Life and receive commissions, marketing allowances and other compensation as stipulated by such agreements. In connection with these arrangements, the Ivy Funds VIP are offered and sold on a continuous basis.
In addition to distributing variable products, we distribute a number of other insurance products through our insurance agency subsidiaries, including individual term life, group term life, whole life, accident and health, long-term care, Medicare supplement and disability insurance. We receive commissions and compensation from various underwriters for distributing these products. We are not an underwriter for any insurance policies.
Distribution Channels
We distribute our investment products through the Advisors, Wholesale and Institutional channels.
Advisors Channel
OurAssets under management in the Advisors channel were $31.7 billion at December 31, 2011. Historically, our advisors sellhave sold investment products primarily to middle-incomemiddle income and mass affluent individuals, families and businesses across the country in geographic markets of all sizes. We assist clients on a wide range of financial issues with a significant focus on helping them plan, generally, for long-term investments such as retirement and education and offer one-on-one consultations that emphasize long-term relationships through continued service. As a result of this approach, this channel has developed a loyal customer base with clients maintaining their accounts significantly longer than the industry average. The redemption rate inOver the Advisors channel for the year endedpast several years, we have expanded our Choice brokerage platform technology and offerings that should allow us to competitively recruit experienced advisors.
As of December 31, 2008 was 8.9%, compared to the industry average of 29.7%, as derived from statistics provided by the Investment Company Institute ("ICI").
Our2011, our sales force consisted of 2,3661,816 financial advisors including 168 district managers and 201 district supervisors as of December 31, 2008. Eight regional vice presidents and 98 managing principals oversee this sales force, which operateswho operate out of 171163 offices located throughout the United States and 306256 individual advisor offices. We believe, based on industry data, that our financial advisors are currently one of the largest sales forces in the United States selling primarily mutual funds, and that W&R, our broker/dealer subsidiary, ranks among the largest independent broker/dealers. As of December 31, 2008,2011, our Advisors channel had approximately 540,000502 thousand mutual fund customers with an average investmentcustomers.
Over the past several years, we have instituted more stringent production requirements for our sales force, which has resulted in a steady decline in our number of $37,000advisors. However, gross sales have not declined over this period and approximately 78,000 variable account customers with an average investment of $44,000.
The following table illustrates commissionable investment product sales by our financial advisors (including InvestEd) for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. Sales are shown gross of commissions and exclude sales by Legend advisors, sales of money market funds, non-proprietary funds, insurance products, and mutual funds sold at net asset value for which we receive no commission.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | ||||||||||
Front-end load sales | $ | 1,232 | 1,406 | 1,700 | |||||||
Variable annuity products | 529 | 464 | 331 | ||||||||
Front-load product total | 1,761 | 1,870 | 2,031 | ||||||||
Deferred-load sales | 119 | 134 | 186 | ||||||||
Fee-based allocation products | 817 | 628 | 59 | ||||||||
Total advisor sales | $ | 2,697 | 2,632 | 2,276 | |||||||
As of December 31, 2008, 38% of our financial advisors have been with us for more than five years and 24% for more than ten years. Our New Advisor Career Transition program(s), designed to meet the needs of the different audiences from which we recruit, such as college graduates, career changers and industry experienced professionals, provide our new advisors with a unique transition experience until they can develop the skills and client base necessary to earn a stable income from commissions alone. These programs have played an important role in advisor retention and have contributed to an increase in the average productivity of our new advisors. In addition, the introduction of a Sales Incentive Dashboard to this channel produced 5% more in 2007 has made it easier for field leaders and2011 with 13% fewer advisors, on average, compared to keep track of their sales results daily with web-based sales data.2010. We also undertook technology initiatives in 2007, fully implemented in 2008, that allow us to provide our clients consolidated statements and more robust brokerage capabilities. We believe these efforts will support the retention of existing advisors and our recruiting efforts, including those aimed at experienced advisors. Salesutilize gross revenue per advisor (investment product sales divided by the average number of advisors) were $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $994 thousand, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Growth in this metric is important to us since investment product sales are invested in our Funds' assets.
Gross production per advisor is an additional method of measuring advisor productivity that is more closely aligned with industry standard methods, which use gross commissions per sales representative to measure advisor productivity. For purposes of this measure, gross productionrevenue consists of front-end load sales and distribution fee revenues, as would be received from an underwriter, from sales of both our Funds and other mutual funds. It also includes fee revenues from our asset allocation products and financial plans, and commission revenues earned on insurance products. This measure excludes Rule 12b-1 service fee revenues, variable annuity distribution fee revenues and all revenues related to Class Y shares, all of which do not relate to the distribution activities of our financial advisors. Gross productionrevenue per advisor was $64.1$156 thousand, $64.7$119 thousand and $61.8$93 thousand for the years 2008, 2007ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively.
Wholesale Channel
Our Wholesale channel consists ofgenerates sales garnered through various third-party distribution outlets and Legend advisors. In an effort to accelerate sales growth, we have focused on expanding our Wholesale distribution efforts over the past five years. Our launch into this channel included acquiring Mackenzie Investment Management Inc. ("MIMI") in 2002 and entering into a strategic alliance agreement with Securian in 2003. MIMI was a Florida-based investment management subsidiary of Toronto-based Mackenzie Financial Corporation ("MFC") and adviser of the Ivy Funds sold in the United States. As part of our strategic alliance with Securian, we agreed to become the investment adviser for substantially all equity assets managed by Advantus Capital Management, Inc. ("Advantus"), a subsidiary of Securian and an affiliate of Minnesota Life, and to acquire the assets of Securian's Advantus Funds.
As a result of an increased demand for our funds in our Wholesale channel due to strong investment and sales performance and assets gained through acquisitions, our assets under management fromin the Wholesale channel have increased from $3.8were $41.0 billion at December 31, 2003 to $17.5 billion at December 31, 2008,2011, including $3.1$4.1 billion in assets at December 31, 20082011 that are subadvised by other managers.
The following table summarizes certain components of the changes in the Wholesale channel's assets under management for the last three fiscal years.
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | $ | 15,599 | 9,470 | 4,541 | ||||||
Redemptions | (8,541) | (2,795) | (1,915) | |||||||
Net Sales | 7,058 | 6,675 | 2,626 | |||||||
Market Appreciation (Depreciation) | (10,980) | 3,894 | 1,263 | |||||||
Ending Assets Under Management | $ | 17,489 | 21,537 | 10,819 |
During 2008, we achieved significant growth in mutual fund sales through wholesale distribution and built on our presence in the wholesale market. We continued to expand our team of national wholesalers, reaching a total of 35 by year-end, and the Ivy Funds family increased its presence in a number of broker/dealer platforms. These third parties have a client relationship with, and maintain an account for, the investors. Typically, investors purchase our investment products at the suggestion of third parties, thereby expanding our opportunities to gain new investors. Our wholesaling efforts focus principally on distributing the Ivy Funds through three segments: broker/dealers (the largest method of distributing mutual funds for the industry and for us), retirement platforms (401(k) platforms using multiple managers) and registered investment advisors (fee-based financial advisors who generally sell mutual funds through financial supermarkets). We continued to expand our team of external wholesalers in 2011, reaching a total of 51 wholesalers by year-end. In 2010, we restructured our wholesaler territories into smaller, more manageable areas that enabled our wholesalers to focus on additional distribution partners in their territories.
Legend advisors distributeDuring 2011, our Funds, along with mutual funds managed by other investment companies, through Legend's retirement advisor sales force. At December 31, 2008, Legend had 436 registered retirement advisors in 107 offices, which are primarily individual advisor offices, located mainlyIvy Asset Strategy fund continued to play a lead role in the eastern partWholesale channel's results, comprising 47% of the United States. These retirement advisors are not included in the discussionchannel's sales and 30% of our financial advisors, nor in disclosures of the number of advisors we have licensed. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Legend advisors sold $63.8 million, $74.2 million and $74.0 million of our mutual funds, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Legend also sold $262.4 million, $363.5 million and $382.5 million, respectively, of unaffiliated mutual funds. Sales per Legend advisor were $728 thousand in 2008. Legend had $3.5 billion of clienttotal assets under administrationmanagement as of December 31, 2008, including $346.0 million2011. While we recognize the past success of this fund, we are also aware of the concentration risks to our revenue streams created by the size of this fund, despite its flexible mandate. Our compensation program for wholesalers encourages the sales of other products with track records of strong performance. Over the past two years, we saw wholesalers successfully market additional products to their financial advisor clients, which resulted in our funds.Wholesale channel sales for the Ivy Asset Strategy fund decreasing from 60% in 2010 to 47% in 2011. We plan to continue to stress diversification of sales as we enter 2012.
Institutional Channel
WRIMCO and ACFThrough this channel, we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for a variety of institutions. The largest client type is funds that hire us to act as subadvisor; they are typically distributors who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market their investment advisory services to institutions directly or through consultants that assist with the manager selection process. Most of our institutional business is in defined benefit pension plans and subadvised mutual funds. A significant amount of assets aremulti-manager styles. Our diverse client list also managed for defined contribution pension plans,includes corporations, foundations, endowments, Taft-Hartley plans high net worth individuals and insurance company general accounts.
public funds, including defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans. Over time, the past several years, we have expanded our distribution effortsInstitutional channel has been successful in developing subadvisory relationships. As of December 31, 2011, this channel by entering into additional subadvisory agreements with certain strategic partners. As parttype of business comprised more than 60% of the acquisitionInstitutional channel's assets, which management views as a positive development as it believes this type of MIMI's business has better growth potential than the defined benefit business. Assets under management in 2002, we entered into new subadvisory and marketing agreements extending MFC's subadvisory agreements with IICO and providing us with additional investment management opportunities in Canada. Pursuant to these subadvisory agreements, we receive investment management fees covering multiple funds. The subadvisory agreement with MFC is renewable on an annual basis.the Institutional channel were $10.5 billion at December 31, 2011.
Through our strategic alliance agreement with Securian, we agreed to become investment adviser for substantially all equity assets managed by Advantus. In addition, the Company manages as separate accounts certain actively managed equities in the Minnesota Life and Securian Holding Company general accounts.
During the past three years, our institutional asset flows were negatively impacted by underperformance at ACF, although we maintain a solid reputation in the institutional asset management business, built on a very competititve performance record and on our disciplined investment style, which focuses on risk adjusted returns and produces consistent results over time.
Service Agreements
We earn service fee revenues by providing various services to the Funds and their shareholders pursuant to shareholder servicing and accounting service agreements with each Fund.shareholders. Pursuant to the shareholder servicing agreements, we perform shareholder servicing functions for which the Funds pay us a monthly fee, including: maintaining shareholder accounts; issuing, transferring and redeeming shares; distributing dividends and paying redemptions; furnishing information related to the Funds; and handling shareholder inquiries. Pursuant to the accounting service agreements, we provide the Funds with bookkeeping and accounting services and assistance for which the Funds pay us a monthly fee, including: maintaining the Funds' records; pricing Fund shares; and preparing prospectuses for existing shareholders, proxy statements and certain other shareholder reports.
These agreementsAgreements with the Funds may be adopted or amended with the approval of the disinterested members of each Fund's board of directors/trustees and have annually renewable terms of one year.
Regulation
The securities industry is subject to extensive regulation and virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect investment advisory clients and shareholders of registered investment companies. Under such laws and regulations, agencies and organizations that regulate investment advisers, broker/dealers, and transfer agents like us have broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent from carrying on its business in the event that it fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include, but are not limited to, the suspension of individual employees or agents, limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, censures, fines and the revocation of investment adviser and other registrations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") is the federal agency responsible for the administration of federal securities laws. Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the Advisers Act, which imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers including, among other things, fiduciary duties, record-keeping and reporting requirements, operational requirements and disclosure obligations, as well as general anti-fraud prohibitions. Investment advisers are subject to periodic examination by the SEC, and the SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act, ranging from censure to termination of an investment adviser's registration.
Our Funds are registered as investment companies with the SEC under the ICA, and various filings are made with states under applicable state rules and regulations. The ICA regulates the relationship between a mutual fund and its investment adviser and prohibits or severely restricts principal transactions and joint transactions. Various regulations cover certain investment strategies that may be used by the Funds for hedging and/or speculative purposes. To the extent the Funds purchase futures contracts, options on futures contracts and foreign currency contracts, they are subject to the commodities and futures regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
We derive a large portion of our revenues from investment management agreements. Under the Advisers Act, our investment management agreements terminate automatically if assigned without the client's consent. Under the ICA, investment advisory agreements with registered investment companies, such as the Funds, terminate automatically upon assignment. The term "assignment" is broadly defined and includes direct assignments, as well as assignments that may be deemed to occur, under certain circumstances, upon the transfer, directly or indirectly, of a controlling interest in the Company.
The Company is also subject to federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("S-OX"), as well as rules adopted by the SEC. In 2004, we implemented compliance with Section 404 of S-OX. Our related report on internal controls over financial reporting for 2008 is included in Part I, Item 9A.
As a publicly traded company, we are also subject to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), the exchange on which our stock is listed, including the corporate governance listing standards approved by the SEC.
Three of our subsidiaries, W&R, LEC and IFDI, are also registered as broker/dealers with the SEC and the states. Much of the broker/dealer regulation has been delegated by the SEC to self-regulatory organizations, principally the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), which is the primary regulator of our broker/dealer activities. These self-regulatory organizations adopt rules (subject to approval by the SEC) that govern the industry and conduct periodic examinations of our operations over which they have jurisdiction. Securities firms are also subject to regulation by state securities administrators in those states in which they conduct business. Broker/dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales practices, market making and trading among broker/dealers, the use and safekeeping of clients' funds and securities, capital structure, record-keeping, and the conduct of directors, officers and employees. Violation of applicable regulations can result in the revocation of broker/dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines, and the suspension or expulsion of a firm, its officers or employees.
W&R, LEC and IFDI are also each subject to certain net capital requirements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act (the "Net Capital Rule") specifies the minimum level of net capital a registered broker/dealer must maintain and also requires that part of its assets be kept in a relatively liquid form. The Net Capital Rule is designed to ensure the financial soundness and liquidity of broker/dealers. Any failure to maintain the required minimum net capital may subject us to suspension or revocation of our registration or other limitations on our activity by the SEC, and suspension or expulsion by FINRA or other regulatory bodies, and ultimately could require the broker/dealer's liquidation. The maintenance of minimum net capital requirements may also limit our ability to pay dividends. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, net capital for W&R, LEC and IFDI exceeded all minimum requirements.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, W&R and LEC are members of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (the "SIPC"). IFDI is not a member of the SIPC. The SIPC provides protection against lost, stolen or missing securities (but not loss in value due to a rise or fall in market prices) for clients in the event of the failure of a broker/dealer. Accounts are protected up to $500,000 per client with a limit of $100,000 for cash balances. However, since the Funds, and not our broker/dealer subsidiaries, maintain customer accounts, SIPC protection would not cover mutual fund shareholders.
Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001, imposes significant new anti-money laundering requirements on all financial institutions, including domestic banks and domestic operations of foreign banks, broker/dealers, futures commission merchants and investment companies.
Our businesses may be materially affected not only by regulations applicable to us as an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent, but also by law and regulations of general application. For example, the volume of our principal investment advisory business in a given time period could be affected by, among other things, existing and proposed tax legislation and other governmental regulations and policies (including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board), and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules that affect the business and financial communities.
Competition
The financial services industry is a highly competitive global industry. According to the ICI, at the end of 20082011 there were more than 8,8008,600 open-end investment companies of varying sizes, investment policies and objectives whose shares are being offered to the public in the United States alone. Factors affecting our business include brand recognition, business reputation, investment performance, quality of service and the continuity of both client relationships and assets under management. A majority of mutual fund sales go to funds that are highly rated by a small number of well-known ranking services that focus on investment performance. Competition is based on distribution methods, the type and quality of shareholder services, the success of marketing efforts and the ability to develop investment products for certain market segments to meet the changing needs of investors, and to achieve competitive investment management performance.
We compete with hundreds of other mutual fund management, distribution and service companies that distribute their fund shares through a variety of methods, including affiliated and unaffiliated sales forces, broker/dealers and direct sales to the public of shares offered at a low or no sales charge. Many larger mutual fund complexes have significant advertising budgets and established relationships with brokerage houses with large distribution networks, which enable these fund complexes to reach broad client bases. Many investment management firms offer services and products similar to ours, as well as other independent financial advisors. We also compete with brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, commercial banks and other financial institutions and businesses offering other financial products in all aspects of their businesses. Although no single company or group of companies consistently dominates the mutual fund management and services industry, many are larger than us, have greater resources and offer a wider array of financial services and products. We believe that competition in the mutual fund industry will increase as a result of increased flexibility afforded to banks and other financial institutions to sponsor mutual funds and distribute mutual fund shares. Additionally, barriers to entry into the investment management business are relatively few, and thus, we face a potentially growing number of competitors, especially during periods of strong financial and economic markets.
The distribution of mutual funds and other investment products has undergone significant developments in recent years, which has intensified the competitive environment in which we operate. These developments include the introduction of new products, increasingly complex distribution systems with multiple classes of shares, the development of Internet websites providing investors with the ability to invest on-line, the introduction of sophisticated technological platforms used by financial advisors to sell and service mutual funds for their clients, the introduction of separately managed accounts—accounts — previously available only to institutional investors—investors — to individuals, and growth in the number of mutual funds offered.
We believe we effectively compete across multiple dimensions of the asset management and broker/dealer businesses. First, our proprietary broker/dealer consists of a sales force of independent contractors affiliated with our company who primarily utilize our financial products. We believe our business model
targets customers seeking personal assistance from financial advisors or planners where the primary competition is companies distributing products through a financial advisor or broker/dealer sales force.advisors. Our financial advisors compete primarily with large and small broker/dealers, independent financial advisors, registered investment advisors and insurance representatives. The market for financial planning and advice is extremely fragmented, consistingbroad and fragmented. Second, we market our products, primarily the Ivy Funds family, to unaffiliated broker/dealers and advisors and compete against other asset managers offering mutual fund products. This second distribution method allows us to move beyond proprietary distribution and increases our potential pool of relatively small companies with fewer than 100 investment professionals.clients. Competition is based on sales techniques, personal relationships and skills, and the quality of financial planning products and services offered. We compete against asset managers which are both larger and smaller than our firm, but we believe that the breadth and depth of our products position us to compete in this environment. Finally, we compete in the institutional marketplace, working with consultants who select asset managers for various opportunities, as well as working directly with plan sponsors, foundations, endowments and other asset managers who hire subadvisors. In this marketplace, we compete with a broad range of asset managers.
We also face competition in attracting and retaining qualified financial advisors and employees. The ability to continue to compete effectively in our business depends in part on our ability to compete effectively in the labor market. In order to maximize this ability, we offer competitive compensation, a wide range of benefits and have several stock-based compensation incentive programs.
Regulation
The securities industry is subject to extensive regulation and virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect investment advisory clients and shareholders of registered investment companies. Under such laws and regulations, agencies and organizations that regulate investment advisers, broker/dealers, and transfer agents like us have broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent from carrying on its business in the event that it fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include, but are not limited to, the suspension of individual employees or agents, limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, censures, fines and the revocation of investment adviser and other registrations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") is the federal agency responsible for the administration of federal securities laws. Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the Advisers Act, which imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers including, among other things, fiduciary duties, record-keeping and reporting requirements, operational requirements and disclosure obligations, as well as general anti-fraud prohibitions. Investment advisers are subject to periodic examination by the SEC, and the SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act, ranging from censure to termination of an investment adviser's registration.
Our Funds are registered as investment companies with the SEC under the ICA, and various filings are made with states under applicable state rules and regulations. The ICA regulates the relationship between a mutual fund and its investment adviser and prohibits or severely restricts principal transactions and joint transactions. Various regulations cover certain investment strategies that may be used by the Funds for hedging and/or speculative purposes. To the extent the Funds purchase futures contracts, options on futures contracts and foreign currency contracts, they are subject to the commodities and futures regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
We derive a large portion of our revenues from investment management agreements. Under the Advisers Act, our investment management agreements terminate automatically if assigned without the client's consent. Under the ICA, investment advisory agreements with registered investment companies, such as the Funds, terminate automatically upon assignment. The term "assignment" is broadly defined
and includes direct assignments, as well as assignments that may be deemed to occur, under certain circumstances, upon the transfer, directly or indirectly, of a controlling interest in the Company.
The Company is also subject to federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("S-OX"), as well as rules adopted by the SEC. In 2004, we implemented compliance with Section 404 of S-OX. Our related report on internal controls over financial reporting for 2011 is included in Part I, Item 9A.
As a publicly traded company, we are also subject to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), the exchange on which our stock is listed, including the corporate governance listing standards approved by the SEC.
Three of our subsidiaries, W&R, LEC and IFDI, are registered as broker/dealers with the SEC and the states. Much of the broker/dealer regulation has been delegated by the SEC to self-regulatory organizations, principally the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), which is the primary regulator of our broker/dealer activities. These self-regulatory organizations adopt rules (subject to approval by the SEC) that govern the industry and conduct periodic examinations of our operations over which they have jurisdiction. Securities firms are also subject to regulation by state securities administrators in those states in which they conduct business. Broker/dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales practices, market making and trading among broker/dealers, the use and safekeeping of clients' funds and securities, capital structure, record-keeping, and the conduct of directors, officers and employees. Violation of applicable regulations can result in the revocation of broker/dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines, and the suspension or expulsion of a firm, its officers or employees.
W&R, LEC and IFDI are each subject to certain net capital requirements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act (the "Net Capital Rule") specifies the minimum level of net capital a registered broker/dealer must maintain and also requires that part of its assets be kept in a relatively liquid form. The Net Capital Rule is designed to ensure the financial soundness and liquidity of broker/dealers. Any failure to maintain the required minimum net capital may subject us to suspension or revocation of our registration or other limitations on our activity by the SEC, and suspension or expulsion by FINRA or other regulatory bodies, and ultimately could require the broker/dealer's liquidation. The maintenance of minimum net capital requirements may also limit our ability to pay dividends. As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, net capital for W&R, LEC and IFDI exceeded all minimum requirements.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, W&R and LEC are members of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (the "SIPC"). IFDI is not a member of the SIPC. The SIPC provides protection against lost, stolen or missing securities (but not loss in value due to a rise or fall in market prices) for clients in the event of the failure of a broker/dealer. Accounts are protected up to $500,000 per client with a limit of $100,000 for cash balances. However, since the Funds, and not our broker/dealer subsidiaries, maintain customer accounts, SIPC protection would not cover mutual fund shareholders whose accounts are maintained directly with the Funds.
Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001, imposes significant anti-money laundering requirements on all financial institutions, including domestic banks and domestic operations of foreign banks, broker/dealers, futures commission merchants and investment companies.
Our businesses may be materially affected not only by regulations applicable to us as an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent, but also by law and regulations of general application. For example, the volume of our principal investment advisory business in a given time period could be affected by, among other things, existing and proposed tax legislation and other governmental regulations and policies (including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board), and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules that affect the business and financial communities.
Intellectual Property
We regard our names as material to our business, and have registered certain service marks associated with our business with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Employees and Financial Advisors
At December 31, 2008,2011 we had 1,6781,616 full-time employees, consisting of 8931,235 home office employees, 139 employees of subsidiary companies in Florida and Texas, 98 managing principals, eight regional vice presidents, nine associate managers, 162 field office support personnel, and 369 district managers and district supervisors; district managers and supervisors are counted as bothLegend employees and financial advisors.
At December 31, 2008, our sales force (excluding Legend advisors) was comprised of 2,366 financial advisors, including 1,997 financial advisors who are independent contractors381 employees responsible for advisor field supervision and 369 district managers and district supervisors who are considered employees. Legend, which is a part of our Wholesale channel, had 436 retirement advisors considered to be independent contractors.administration.
Available Information
We file reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC, copies of which can be obtained from the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth100 F Street NW,NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.1-800-732-0330.
Reports we file electronically with the SEC via the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system ("EDGAR") may be accessed through the Internet. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, atwww.sec.gov. The Company makes available free of charge our proxy statements, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports under the "Corporate""Reports & SEC Filings" menu on the "Investor Relations" section of our internet website atwww.waddell.com as soon as it is reasonably practical after such filing has been made with the SEC.
Also available underon the "Corporate" section"Corporate Governance" page in the "Our Firm" dropdown menu is information on corporate governance. Stockholders can view our Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics"), which applies to directors, officers and all employees of the Company, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters of key committees (including the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees). Printed copies of these documents are available to any stockholder upon request by calling the investor relations department at 1-800-532-2757. Any future amendments to or waivers of the Code of Ethics will be posted to our website, as required.
Our Financial Advisors Are Classified As Independent Contractors, And Changes To Their Classification May Increase Our Operating Expenses. From time to time, various legislative or regulatory proposals are introduced at the federal or state levels to change the status of independent contractors' classification to employees for either employment tax purposes (withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees. Currently, most individuals are classified as employees or independent contractors for employment tax purposes based on 20 "common law" factors, rather than any definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Treasury regulations. We classify the majority of our financial advisors as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefit purposes. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the independent contractor/employee classification of those financial advisors currently doing business with us. The costs associated with potential changes, if any, with respect to these independent contractor classifications could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including our results of operations and financial condition. See Part I, Item 3. "Legal Proceedings."
Our Business Is Subject To Substantial Risk From Litigation, Regulatory Investigations And Potential Securities Laws Liability. Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of litigation, regulatory investigations and/or arbitration, and from time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings in the course of operating our business. The Company is exposed to liability under federal and state securities
laws, other federal and state laws and court decisions, as well as rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, FINRA and other regulatory bodies. We, our subsidiaries, and/or certain of our past and present officers, have been named as parties in legal actions, regulatory investigations and proceedings, and securities arbitrations in the past and have been subject to claims alleging violation of such laws, rules and regulations, which have resulted in the payment of fines and settlements. An adverse resolution of any lawsuit, legal or regulatory proceeding or claim against us could result in substantial costs or reputational harm to the Company, and have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations, which, in turn, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends. In addition to these financial costs and risks, the defense of litigation or arbitration may divert resources and management's attention from operations. See Part I, Item 3. "Legal Proceedings."
An Increasing Percentage Of Our Assets Under Management Are Distributed Through Our Wholesale Channel, Which Has Higher Redemption Rates Than Our Traditional Advisors Channel. In recent years, we have focused on expanding distribution efforts relating to our Wholesale channel. The percentage of our assets under management in the Wholesale channel has increased from 10% at December 31, 2003 to 49% at December 31, 2011, and the percentage of our total sales represented by the Wholesale channel has increased from 17% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 70% for the year ended December 31, 2011. The success of sales in our Wholesale channel depends upon our maintaining strong relationships with institutional accounts, certain strategic partners and our third party distributors. Many of those distribution sources also offer investors competing funds that are internally or externally managed, which could limit the distribution of our products. The loss of any of these distribution channels and the inability to continue to access new distribution channels could decrease our assets under management and adversely affect our results of operations and growth. There are no assurances that these channels and their client bases will continue to be accessible to us. The loss or diminution of the level of business we do with those providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, especially with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel, namely the Ivy Asset Strategy fund. Compared to the industry average redemption rate of 27.0% and 26.3% for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the Wholesale channel had redemption rates of 29.5% and 29.3% for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Redemption rates were 10.0% and 9.3% for our Advisors channel in the same periods, reflecting the higher rate of transferability of investment assets in the Wholesale channel.
There May Be An Adverse Effect On Our Revenues And Earnings If Our Investors Redeem The Assets We Manage On Short Notice. Mutual fund investors may redeem their investments in our mutual funds at any time without any prior notice. Additionally, our investment management agreements with institutions and other non-mutual fund accounts are generally terminable upon relatively short notice. Investors can terminate their relationship with us, reduce their aggregate amount of assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. The ability of our investors to accomplish this on short notice has increased materially due to the growth of assets in our Wholesale channel, and with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel, including the Ivy Asset Strategy fund. The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings.
There Is No Assurance That New Information Systems Will be Implemented Successfully. A number of the Company's key information technology systems were developed solely to handle the Company's particular information technology infrastructure. The Company is in the process of evaluating and implementing new information technology and systems that it believes could facilitate and improve our core businesses and our productivity. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in implementing the new information technology and systems or that their implementation will be completed in a timely or cost effective manner. Failure to implement or maintain adequate information technology infrastructure could impede our ability to support business growth.
Regulatory Risk Is Substantial In Our Business And Non-Compliance With Regulations, Or Changes In Regulations, Could Have A Significant Impact On The Conduct Of Our Business And Our Prospects, Revenues And Earnings. Our investment advisory and broker/dealer businesses are heavily regulated, primarily at the federal level. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could result in sanctions being levied against us, including fines and censures, suspension or expulsion from a certain jurisdiction or market, or the revocation of licenses. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could also adversely affect our reputation, prospects, revenues and earnings. In addition, changes in current legal, regulatory, accounting, tax or compliance requirements or in governmental policies could adversely affect our operations, revenues and earnings by, among other things, increasing expenses and reducing investor interest in certain products we offer. Distribution fees paid to mutual fund distributors in accordance with Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("Rule 12b-1") are an important element of the distribution of the mutual funds we manage. The SEC has proposed replacing Rule 12b-1 with a new regulation that would significantly change current fund distribution practices in the industry. If this proposed regulation is adopted, it may have a material impact on the compensation we pay to distributors for distributing the mutual funds we manage and/or our ability to recover expenses related to the distribution of our funds, and thus could materially impact our revenue and net income. Additionally, our profitability could be affected by rules and regulations that impact the business and financial communities generally, including changes to the laws governing state and federal taxation.
Our Revenues, Earnings And Prospects Could Be Adversely Affected If The Securities Markets Decline. Our results of operations are affected by certain economic factors, including the level of the securities markets. The on-going existence of adverse market conditions, which is particularly material to us due to our high concentration of assets under management in the United States domestic stock market, and lack of investor confidence could result in investors further withdrawing from the markets or decreasing their rate of investment, either of which could adversely affect our revenues, earnings and growth prospects to a greater extent. Because our revenues are, to a large extent, investment management fees that are based on the value of assets under management, a decline in the value of these assets adversely affects our revenues and earnings. Our growth is dependent to a significant degree upon our ability to attract and retain mutual fund assets, and, in thean adverse economic environment, this may prove more difficult. Our growth rate has varied from year to year and there can be no assurance that the average growth rates sustained in recent years will continue. Further declinesDeclines in the securities markets could significantly reduce future revenues and earnings. In addition, a decline in the market value of these assets could cause our clients to withdraw
funds in favor of investments they perceive as offering greater opportunity or lower risk, which could also negatively impact our revenues and earnings. The combination of adverse markets reducing sales and investment management fees could compound on each other and materially affect earnings.
There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Revenues And Earnings If Our Funds' Performance Declines. Success in the investment management and mutual fund businesses is dependent on the investment performance of client accounts relative to market conditions and the performance of competing funds. Good relative performance stimulates sales of the Funds' shares and tends to keep redemptions low. Sales of the Funds' shares in turn generate higher management fees and distribution revenues. Good relative performance also attracts institutional and separate accounts. Conversely, poor relative performance results in decreased sales, increased redemptions of the Funds' shares and the loss of institutional and separate accounts, resulting in decreases in revenues. Failure of our Funds to perform well could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.
There Are No Assurances That We Will Pay Future Dividends, Which Could Adversely Affect Our Stock Price. The Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") currently intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on our Class A common stock (our "common stock"); however, the declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Any determination as to the payment of dividends, as well as the level of such dividends, will depend on, among other things, general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, and contractual, legal, and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us or our subsidiaries. We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide us with cash. There can be no assurance that the current quarterly dividend level will be maintained or that we will pay any dividends in any future period(s). Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could adversely affect our stock price.
An Increasing Percentage Of Our Assets Under Management Are Distributed Through Our Wholesale Channel, Which Has Higher Redemption Rates Than Our Traditional Advisors Channel. In recent years, we have focused on expanding distribution efforts relating to our Wholesale channel. The percentage of our assets under management in the Wholesale channel has increased from 10.4% at December 31, 2003 to 36.8% at December 31, 2008, and the percentage of our total sales represented by the Wholesale channel has increased from 16.5% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 71.9% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The success of sales in our Wholesale channel depends upon our maintaining strong relationships with institutional accounts, certain strategic partners and our third party distributors. Many of those distribution sources also offer investors competing funds that are internally or externally managed, which could limit the distribution of our products. The loss of any of these distribution channels and the inability to continue to access new distribution channels could decrease our assets under management and adversely affect our results of operations and growth. We cannot assure you that these channels and their client bases will continue to be accessible to us. The loss or diminution of the level of business we do with those providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, especially with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel. In addition, the Wholesale channel had redemption rates of 35.5% and 18.5% for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, compared to redemption rates of 8.9% and 9.1% for our Advisors channel in the same periods, reflecting the higher rate of transferability of investment assets in the Wholesale channel.
There May Be An Adverse Effect On Our Revenues And Earnings If Our Investors Redeem The Assets We Manage On Short Notice. Mutual fund investors may redeem their investments in our mutual funds at any time without any prior notice. Additionally, our investment management agreements with institutions and other non-mutual fund accounts are generally terminable upon relatively short notice. Investors can terminate their relationship with us, reduce their aggregate amount of assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. The ability of our investors to accomplish this on short notice has increased materially due to the growth of assets in
our Wholesale channel, and with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel. The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings.
Our Financial Advisors Are Classified As Independent Contractors, And Changes To Their Classification May Increase Our Operating Expenses. From time to time, various legislative or regulatory proposals are introduced at the federal or state levels to change the status of independent contractors' classification to employees for either employment tax purposes (withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees. Currently, most individuals are classified as employees or independent contractors for employment tax purposes based on 20 "common law" factors, rather than any definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Internal Revenue Service regulations. We classify the majority of our financial advisors as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefit purposes. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the independent contractor/employee classification of those financial advisors currently doing business with us. The costs associated with potential changes, if any, with respect to these independent contractor classifications could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including our results of operations and financial condition, if we were unable to reflect them in our compensation arrangements with the financial advisors.
Our Ability To Hire And Retain Senior Executive Management And Other Key Personnel Is Significant To Our Success And Growth. Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to attract and retain qualified senior executive management and other key personnel to conduct our broker/dealer, fund management and investment advisory businesses. The market for qualified fund managers, investment analysts, and financial advisors and wholesalers is extremely competitive. Additionally, we are dependent on our financial advisors and select wholesale distributors to sell our mutual funds and other investment
products. Our growth prospects will be directly affected by the quality, quantity and productivity of financial advisors and wholesalers we are able to successfully recruit and retain. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain the required personnel.
We Have Substantial Intangibles On Our Balance Sheet, And Any Impairment Of Our Intangibles Could Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations And Financial Position. At December 31, 2008,2011, our total assets were approximately $775.4 million,$1.1 billion, of which approximately $221.2 million, or 29%20%, consisted of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. We complete an ongoing review of goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events or a change in circumstances warrant. Important factors in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts, significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being tested. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the annual impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge. Any such charge could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position.
There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Business And Earnings Upon The Termination Of, Or Failure To Renew, Certain Agreements. A majority of our revenues are derived from investment management agreements with the Funds that, as required by law, are terminable on 60 days' notice. Each investment management agreement must be approved and renewed annually by the disinterested members of each Fund's board of directors/trustees or its shareholders, as required by law. Additionally, our investment management agreements provide for automatic termination in the event of assignment, which includes a change of control, without the consent of our clients and, in the case of the Funds, approval of the Funds' board of directors/trustees and shareholders to continue the agreements. There can be no assurances that
our clients will consent to any assignment of our investment management agreements, or that those and other contracts will not be terminated or will be renewed on favorable terms, if at all, at their expiration and new agreements may not be available. See "Business –— Distribution Channels –— Wholesale Channel, Institutional Channel." The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings.
There Is No Assurance That New Information Systems Will be Implemented Successfully. A number of the Company's key information technology systems were developed solely to handle the Company's particular information technology infrastructure. The Company is in the process of evaluating and implementing new information technology and systems that it believes could facilitate and improve our core businesses and our productivity, including financial reporting and accounting systems. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in implementing the new information technology and systems or that their implementation will be completed in a timely or cost effective manner. Failure to implement or maintain adequate information technology infrastructure could impede our ability to support business growth.
A Failure In Or Breach Of Our Operational Or Security Systems Failure May DisruptOr Our Technology Infrastructure, Or Those Of Third Parties, Could Result In A Material Adverse Effect On Our Business, And Result In Financial Loss And Liability To Our Clients.Reputation, Cash Flows and Results Of Operations. Our business isWe are highly dependent on financial, accountingupon the use of various proprietary and third-party software applications and other data processingtechnology systems and other communications and information systems, includingto operate our mutual fund transfer agency system maintained by a third-party service provider. Webusiness. As part of our normal operations, we process a large number of transactions on a daily basis and relymaintain and transmit confidential client and employee information, the safety and security of which is dependent upon the proper functioningeffectiveness of computer systems of third parties. If any of these systems do not function properly, we could suffer financial loss, business disruption, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or damage to our reputation. If our systems are unable to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions, our ability to expand could be affected. Although we have back-up systems in place, we cannot be sure that any systems failure or interruption, whether caused by a fire, other natural disaster, power or telecommunications failure, acts of terrorism or war or otherwise will not occur, or that back-upinformation security policies, procedures and capabilities into protect such systems and the event of any failuredata that reside on or interruption will be adequate.are transmitted through them.
Regulatory Risk Is Substantial In Our Business And Non-Compliance With Regulations, Or Changes In Regulations, Could Have Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify these protective measures as circumstances warrant, technology is subject to rapid change and the nature of the threats continue to evolve. As a result, our operating and technology systems, software and networks may fail to operate properly or become disabled, or may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, inadvertent disclosure, loss or destruction of data (including confidential client information), computer viruses or other malicious code, cyber attacks and other events that could materially damage our operations, have an adverse security impact, or cause the disclosure or modification of sensitive or confidential information. Most of the software applications that we use in our business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-party vendors. A Significant Impact On The Conduct Of Our Business And Our Prospects, Revenues And Earnings. Our investment advisory and broker/dealer businesses are heavily regulated, primarily at the federal level. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could result in sanctions being levied against us, including fines and censures, suspension or expulsion from atermination of certain jurisdiction or market,of these licenses or the revocation of licenses. Non-compliance with applicable lawsrelated support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or regulations couldinterruption. We also adversely affect our reputation, prospects, revenues and earnings. In addition, changes in current legal, regulatory, accounting, tax or compliance requirements or in governmental policies could adversely affect our operations, revenues and earnings by, among other things, increasing expenses and reducing investor interest in certain products we offer. Additionally, our profitability could be affected by rules and regulations that impact the business and financial communities generally, including changes to the laws governing state and federal taxation.
In recent years, allegations of late trading, market timing and selective disclosure of portfolio information in the mutual fund industry have prompted various legislative and regulatory proposals, some of which have been adopted by the SEC, the United States Congress, the legislatures in states in which we conduct operations and the various regulatory agencies that supervise our operations. In particular, new rules and regulations adopted by the SEC and FINRA place greater regulatory compliance and administrative burdens on us and could have a substantial impact on the regulation, operation and distribution of mutual funds and variable products, and could adversely affect our ability to distribute and retain the assets we manage and our revenues and net income. For example, recently adopted rules require investment advisers and mutual funds to adopt, implement, review and administer written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws. Similarly, public disclosure requirements applicable to mutual funds have become more stringent. We may require additional staff to satisfy these obligations, which would increase our operating expenses.take
Our Business Is Subject To Substantial Risk From Litigation, Regulatory Investigations And Potential Securities Laws Liability. Many aspectsprecautions to password protect and/or encrypt our laptops and other mobile electronic hardware. If such hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, it may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us. Further, while we have in place a disaster recovery plan to address catastrophic and unpredictable events, there is no guarantee that this plan will be sufficient in responding to or ameliorating the effects of all disaster scenarios, and we may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war, and third-party failures.
The breach of our business involve substantial risksoperational or technology systems, software and networks, or those of litigation, regulatory investigationsthird parties, due to one or more of these events could cause interruptions, malfunctions or failures in our operations and/or arbitration, and from time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings in the courseloss or inadvertent disclosure of operating our business. The Company is exposed to liability under federal and state securities laws, other federal and state laws and court decisions, as well as rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, FINRA and other regulatory bodies. We, our subsidiaries, and/or certain of our past and present officers, have been named as parties in legal actions, regulatory investigations and proceedings, and securities arbitrations in the past and have been subject to claims alleging violation of such laws, rules and regulations, which have resulted in the payment of fines and settlements. An adverse resolution of any lawsuit, legal or regulatory proceeding or claim against usconfidential client information could result in substantial financial loss or costs, liability for stolen assets or reputational harminformation, breach of client contracts, client dissatisfaction and/or loss, regulatory actions, remediation costs to repair damage caused by the Company,breach, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and litigation costs resulting from the incident. These events, and those discussed above, could have a material adverse effect on the Company'sour business, financial condition orreputation, results of operations, which, in turn, may negatively affect the market price of our common stockfinancial position, cash flow, revenues and our ability to pay dividends. In addition to these financial costs and risks, the defense of litigation or arbitration may divert resources and management's attention from operations.income.
Regulations Restricting The Use Of "Soft Dollars" Could Result In An Increase In Our Expenses. On behalf of our mutual fund and investment advisory clients, we make decisions to buy and sell securities for each portfolio, select broker/dealers to execute trades, and negotiate brokerage commission rates. In connection with these transactions, we may receive "soft dollar credits" from broker/dealers that we can use to defray certain of our expenses. If regulations are adopted eliminating the ability of asset managers to use "soft dollars," our operating expenses could increase.
Fee Pressures Could Reduce Our Revenues And Profitability. There is a trend toward lower fees in some segments of the investment management business. In addition, the SEC has adopted rules that are designed to improve mutual fund corporate governance, which could result in further downward pressure on investment advisory fees in the mutual fund industry. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current fee structure. Fee reductions on existing or future new business could have an adverse impact on our revenues and profitability.
We Could Experience Adverse Effects On Our Revenues, Profits And Market Share Due To Strong Competition From Numerous And Sometimes Larger Companies. We compete with stock brokerage firms, mutual fund companies, investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks, Internet investment sites, and other financial institutions and individual registered investment advisers. Many of these companies not only offer mutual fund investments and services, but also offer an ever-increasing number of other financial products and services. Many of our competitors have more products and product lines, services and brand recognition and may also have substantially greater assets under management. Many larger mutual fund complexes have developed more extensive relationships with brokerage houses with large distribution networks, which may enable those fund complexes to reach broader client bases. In recent years, there has been a trend of consolidation in the mutual fund industry resulting in stronger competitors with greater financial resources than us. There has also been a trend toward online Internet financial services. If existing or potential customers decide to invest with our competitors instead of with us, our market share, revenues and income could decline.
The Terms Of Our Credit Facility And Senior Unsecured Notes Impose Restrictions On Our Operations That May Adversely Impact Our Prospects And The Operations Of Our Business. There are no assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed, which could negatively impact our liquidity, prospects and operations. We have entered into a 364-day3-year revolving credit facility with various lenders providing for total loans of $175.0$125.0 million. Under this facility, the lenders may, at their option upon our request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. At February 20, 2009,16, 2012, there was no balance outstanding under the revolving credit facility. We also entered into a note purchase agreement with various purchasers for the sale and issuance of $190.0 million of unsecured senior notes comprised of $95 million of 5.0% senior notes,
series A, due 2018 and $95 million of 5.75% senior notes, series B, due 2021, all of which were issued on January 13, 2011. The terms and conditions of our revolving credit facility and the money market loansnote purchase agreement impose restrictions that affect, among other things, our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, merge, sell assets, pay dividends and create or incur liens. Our ability to comply with the financial covenants set forth in our credit facility and note purchase agreement could be affected by events beyond our control, and there
can be no assurance that we will achieve operating results that will comply with such terms and conditions, a breach of which could result in a default under our credit facility.facility and note purchase agreement. In the event of a default under the credit facility and/or note purchase agreement, the banks could elect to declare the outstanding principal amount of our credit facility, all interest thereon, and all other amounts payable under our credit facility to be immediately due and payable.payable, and the Company's obligations under the senior unsecured notes could be accelerated and become due and payable, including any make-whole amount, respectively.
Our ability to meet our cash needs and satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon our future operating performance, asset values, the perception of our creditworthiness and, indirectly, the market value of our stock. These factors will be affected by prevailing economic, financial and business conditions and other circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. We anticipate that any funds generated by the issuance of our senior unsecured notes and any borrowings from our existing credit facility money market loans and/or cash provided by operating activities will provide sufficient funds to finance our business plans, meet our operating expenses and service our debt obligations as they become due. However, in the event that we require additional capital, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise such capital when needed or on satisfactory terms, if at all, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew or refinance our credit facility or senior unsecured notes upon itstheir maturity or on favorable terms. If we are unable to raise capital or obtain financing, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our business plan.
Potential Misuse Of Funds And Information In The Possession Of Our Employees And/Or Advisors Could Result In Liability To Our Clients, Subject Us To Regulatory Sanctions Or Otherwise Adversely Affect Our Revenues and Profitability. Our business is based on the trust and confidence of our clients, for whom our financial advisors handle a significant amount of funds, as well as financial and personal information. Although we have implemented a system of internal controls to minimize the risk of fraudulent taking or misuse of funds and information, there can be no assurance that our controls will be adequate or that a taking or misuse by our employees or financial advisors can be prevented. We could be liable in the event of a taking or misuse by our employees or financial advisors and we could also be subject to regulatory sanctions. Although we believe that we have adequately insured against these risks, there can be no assurance that our insurance will be maintained or that it will be adequate to meet any liability. Any damage to the trust and confidence placed in us by our clients may cause assets under management to decline, which could adversely affect our revenues, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Our Stockholders Rights Plan Could Deter Takeover Attempts, Which Some Of Our Stockholders May Believe To Be In Their Best Interest. Under certain conditions, the rights under our stockholders rights plan entitle the holders of such rights to receive shares of our common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. The rights are attached to each share of our outstanding common stock and generally are exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15% or more of the voting power represented by our common stock. Our stockholders rights plan could impede the completion of a merger, tender offer, or other takeover attempt even though some or a majority of our stockholders might believe that a merger, tender offer or takeover is in their best interests, and even if such a transaction could result in our stockholders receiving a premium for their shares of our stock over the then current market price of our stock.
Provisions Of Our Organizational Documents Could Deter Takeover Attempts, Which Some Of Our Stockholders May Believe To Be In Their Best Interest. Under our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors has the authority, without action by our stockholders, to fix certain terms and issue shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share. Actions of our Board of Directors pursuant to this
authority may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company. Other provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and in our Amended and Restated Bylaws impose procedural and other requirements that could be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, including replacing incumbent directors. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, each of which is to serve for a staggered three-year term after the initial classification and election, and incumbent directors may not be removed without cause, all of which may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our Board of Directors. In addition, as a Delaware corporation we are subject to section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law. With certain exceptions, section 203 imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our voting stock.
Our Holding Company Structure Results In Structural Subordination And May Affect Our Ability To Fund Our Operations And Make Payments On Our Debt. We are a holding company and, accordingly, substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flow and our ability to service our debt, including $200$190.0 million of our senior notes, are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries to us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt or provide us with funds for our payment obligations, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or other payments. In addition, any payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business considerations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization, and therefore the right of the holders of our debt to participate in those assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of those subsidiaries' creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we were a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a creditor would be effectively subordinate to any security interest in the assets of our subsidiaries and any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to that held by us.
There Are No Assurances That We Will Pay Future Dividends, Which Could Adversely Affect Our Stock Price. The Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") currently intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on our Class A common stock (our "common stock"); however, the declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Any determination as to the payment of dividends, as well as the level of such dividends, will depend on, among other things, general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, and contractual, legal, and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us or our subsidiaries. We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide us with cash. There can be no assurance that the current quarterly dividend level will be maintained or that we will pay any dividends in any future period(s). Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could adversely affect our stock price.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
OurIn 2011, we purchased two buildings: a 50,000 square foot building located in Overland Park, KS and a 45,000 square foot building located in Mission, KS. These buildings are in the vicinity of buildings currently leased by our home officesoffices. Existing home office lease agreements cover approximately 370,000391,000 square feet for Waddell & Reed Legend, and ACFLegend located in Overland Park, Kansas and Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and San Antonio, Texas, respectively. This figure does not include office space of 41,000 square feet formerly leased by MIMI in Boca Raton, Florida, which has been sublet. In addition, we lease office space for sales management, which is available to our financial advisors and sales managementfor use, in various locations throughout the United States totaling approximately 630,000652,000 square feet. In the opinion of management, the office space owned and leased by the Company is adequate for existing operating needs.
The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and claims incident to the normal conduct of business, which may include proceedings that are specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices within the industries in which we operate. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and on the results of operations in a particular quarter or year.
Michael E. Taylor, Kenneth B. Young, individuals, on behalf of themselves individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive; Case No. 09-CV-2909 DMS WVG; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
In this action filed December 28, 2009, the Company was sued in an individual action, class action and Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") nationwide collective action by two former advisors asserting misclassification of financial advisors as independent contractors instead of employees. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a purported class of Waddell & Reed, Inc. financial advisors, assert claims under the FLSA for minimum wages and overtime wages, and under California Labor Code Statutes for timely payment of wages, minimum wages, overtime compensation, meal periods, reimbursement of losses and business expenses and itemized wage statements and a claim for Unfair Business Practices under §17200 of the California Business & Professions Code. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief and monetary damages.
Plaintiffs moved for conditional collective action certification under the FLSA. The Company opposed this motion and additionally moved for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' individual FLSA claims. The Court issued an order on January 3, 2012 granting the Company's summary judgment motions, holding that Plaintiffs' individual FLSA claims fail as a matter of law, and denying Plaintiffs' motion for conditional collective action certification under the FLSA as moot. This ruling effectively removes all nationwide FLSA claims from the case.
Plaintiffs intend to continue to pursue the California claims and may seek to amend their complaint to attempt to revive certain FLSA claims. An adverse determination in this matter could have a material adverse impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend plaintiffs' claims.
At this stage in this litigation, based upon the information currently available to the Company, the Company is not able to determine that an unfavorable outcome is remote, reasonably possible, or probable, and the Company has determined that it cannot reasonably estimate either the amount or the range of possible losses that would result if plaintiffs were to prevail, therefore, the Company has not made any accruals with respect to this matter in its consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our Class A common stock ("common stock") is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "WDR." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices of our common stock, as reported by the NYSE, as well as the cash dividends declared for these time periods:
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quarter | High | Low | Dividends Per Share | High | Low | Dividends Per Share | ||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 36.08 | $ | 27.76 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 27.58 | $ | 21.91 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
2 | 38.00 | 30.88 | 0.19 | 27.69 | 22.74 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||
3 | 35.07 | 21.25 | 0.19 | 29.35 | 21.52 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||
4 | 25.27 | 8.57 | 0.19 | 37.65 | 26.71 | 0.17 |
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quarter | High | Low | Dividends Per Share | High | Low | Dividends Per Share | ||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 42.20 | $ | 34.54 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 36.80 | $ | 29.68 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||
2 | 42.49 | 34.45 | 0.20 | 39.24 | 21.80 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||||
3 | 40.04 | 24.78 | 0.20 | 28.55 | 21.52 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||||
4 | 29.78 | 22.85 | 0.25 | 36.47 | 26.89 | 0.20 |
Year-end closing prices of our common stock were $15.46$24.77 and $36.09$35.29 for 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively. The closing price of our common stock on February 20, 200916, 2012 was $14.43.$31.20.
According to the records of our transfer agent, we had 3,8713,185 holders of record of common stock as of February 20, 2009.16, 2012. We believe that a substantially larger number of beneficial stockholders hold such shares in depository or nominee form.
Dividends
The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. We intend, from time to time, to pay cash dividends on our common stock as our Board of Directors deems appropriate, after consideration of our operating results, financial condition, cash and capital requirements, compliance with covenants in our revolving credit facility, note purchase agreement and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. Our current credit facility does not limit our ability to pay cash dividends. To the extent assets are used to meet minimum net capital requirements under the Net Capital Rule, they are not available for distribution to stockholders as dividends. See Part I, Item 1. "Business—Regulation." We anticipate that quarterly dividends will continue to be paid.
Common Stock Repurchases
Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of our common stock in the open market and/or private purchases. The acquired shares may be used for corporate purposes, including shares issued to employees in our stock-based compensation programs. During the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, we repurchased (i) 3,349,8081,951,331 shares in the open market and privately at an aggregate cost, including commissions, of $93.0$65.5 million, (ii) 44,011 mature shares from stock incentive plan participants to cover the strike price of options exercised in connection with a Stock Option Restoration Program (the "SORP"), (iii) 2,704 newly issued shares from SORP participants to cover their statutory minimum tax withholdings on option exercises, and (iv) 430,145including 494,207 shares from related parties to cover their tax withholdings from the vesting of nonvested shares. The aggregate cost of shares obtained from related parties during 20082011 was $12.2$17.9 million. The purchase price paid by us for private repurchases of our common stock from related parties is the closing market price on the purchase date.
The following table sets forth certain information about the shares of common stock we repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2008.2011.
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under The Program | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1 - October 31 | 467,690 | $ 15.18 | 467,690 | n/a (1) | ||||||
November 1 - November 30 | 108,272 | 10.92 | 108,272 | n/a (1) | ||||||
December 1 - December 31 | 172,505 | 12.65 | 172,505 | n/a (1) | ||||||
Total | 748,467 | $ 13.98 | 748,467 | |||||||
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under The Program | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1 - October 31 | 109,100 | $ | 24.10 | 109,100 | n/a | (1) | ||||||
November 1 - November 30 | 83,619 | 24.39 | 83,619 | n/a | (1) | |||||||
December 1 - December 31 | 149,061 | 24.77 | 149,061 | n/a | (1) | |||||||
Total | 341,780 | $ | 24.46 | 341,780 | ||||||||
Total Return Performance
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
(1)
The above graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company's Class A common stock from December 31, 20032006 through December 31, 2008,2011, with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the SNL Asset Manager Index. The SNL Asset Manager Index is a composite of 3233 publicly traded asset management companies (including, among others, the companies in the peer group reviewed by the Compensation Committee for executive compensation purposes) prepared by SNL Financial, Charlottesville, Virginia. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in the Company's classClass A common stock and in each of the two indices on December 31, 20032006 with all dividends being reinvested. The closing price of the Company's Class A common stock on December 31, 20032006 (the last trading day of the year) was $23.46$27.36 per share. The stock price performance on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
Index | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07 | 12/31/08 | | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. | $100.00 | $104.50 | $94.53 | $126.71 | $171.40 | $76.20 | ||||||||
SNL Asset Manager | $100.00 | $130.47 | $165.93 | $192.43 | $219.04 | $104.10 | ||||||||
S&P 500 | $100.00 | $110.88 | $116.33 | $134.70 | $142.10 | $89.53 | ||||||||
| Period Ending | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07 | 12/31/08 | 12/31/09 | 12/31/10 | 12/31/11 | | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. | 100.00 | 135.27 | 60.14 | 122.57 | 145.34 | 104.88 | ||||||||||||||
SNL Asset Manager | 100.00 | 113.83 | 54.10 | 87.76 | 101.02 | 87.38 | ||||||||||||||
S&P 500 | 100.00 | 105.49 | 66.46 | 84.05 | 96.71 | 98.76 | ||||||||||||||
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial and other data at the dates and for the periods indicated. Selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 (1) | 2007 | 2006 (2) | 2005 (3) | 2004 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data and number of financial advisors) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues from: | ||||||||||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 399,863 | 372,345 | 311,525 | 267,681 | 240,282 | ||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 416,762 | 371,085 | 317,458 | 272,590 | 252,883 | |||||||||||
Shareholder service fees | 102,495 | 94,124 | 89,672 | 81,809 | 76,522 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 919,120 | 837,554 | 718,655 | 622,080 | 569,687 | |||||||||||
Net income | 96,163 | 125,497 | 46,112 | 60,121 | 102,165 | |||||||||||
per common share—basic | 1.17 | 1.55 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 1.27 | |||||||||||
per common share—diluted | 1.15 | 1.52 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 1.25 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | ||||||||||
Advisor and productivity data (excluding Legend): | ||||||||||||||||
Investment product sales (4) | $ | 2,696,910 | 2,632,411 | 2,276,405 | 1,901,356 | 1,811,960 | ||||||||||
Number of financial advisors | 2,366 | 2,293 | 2,255 | 2,409 | 2,623 | |||||||||||
Average number of financial advisors | 2,297 | 2,190 | 2,290 | 2,453 | 2,556 | |||||||||||
Investment product sales per advisor | $ | 1,174 | 1,189 | 994 | 776 | 709 | ||||||||||
Wholesale channel data: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | $ | 15,598,998 | 9,469,932 | 4,541,812 | 2,346,749 | 1,375,222 | ||||||||||
Number of wholesalers | 35 | 34 | 26 | 23 | 19 | |||||||||||
Institutional channel sales | $ | 2,358,104 | 1,882,908 | 968,106 | 654,333 | 1,276,614 |
| As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||
Assets under management | $ | 47,484 | 64,868 | 48,401 | 41,863 | 38,658 | ||||||||||
Balance sheet data: | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets | 221.2 | 228.4 | 228.4 | 250.3 | 250.3 | |||||||||||
Total assets | 775.4 | 893.8 | 662.7 | 632.3 | 619.9 | |||||||||||
Short-term debt | - | - | - | 1.7 | 35.0 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt | 200.0 | 200.0 | 199.9 | 198.2 | 202.9 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities | 455.3 | 512.1 | 418.0 | 384.9 | 401.0 | |||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 320.1 | 381.7 | 244.7 | 247.4 | 218.9 |
| For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 (1) | 2008 (2) | 2007 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data and number of financial advisors) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues from: | ||||||||||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 530,599 | 457,538 | 354,593 | 399,863 | 372,345 | ||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 532,693 | 468,057 | 378,678 | 416,762 | 371,085 | |||||||||||
Shareholder service fees | 131,885 | 119,290 | 105,818 | 102,495 | 94,124 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,195,177 | 1,044,885 | 839,089 | 919,120 | 837,554 | |||||||||||
Net income | 175,459 | 156,959 | 105,505 | 96,163 | 125,497 | |||||||||||
Net income per share (basic) | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 1.49 | |||||||||||
Net income per share (diluted) | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 1.48 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.68 | ||||||||||
Advisor channel data: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | $ | 3,799,077 | 3,615,654 | 3,201,867 | 3,724,165 | 3,552,434 | ||||||||||
Gross revenue per advisor | 155.7 | 118.9 | 92.8 | 103.0 | 108.7 | |||||||||||
Number of financial advisors (end of period) | 1,816 | 1,847 | 2,393 | 2,366 | 2,293 | |||||||||||
Average number of financial advisors | 1,757 | 2,019 | 2,336 | 2,297 | 2,190 | |||||||||||
Wholesale channel data: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | $ | 16,594,256 | 14,505,402 | 14,745,230 | 15,598,998 | 9,469,932 | ||||||||||
Number of external wholesalers | 51 | 46 | 34 | 35 | 34 | |||||||||||
Institutional channel sales | $ | 3,413,748 | 3,588,260 | 1,703,470 | 2,358,104 | 1,882,908 | ||||||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||||||||
Assets under management | $ | 83,157 | 83,673 | 69,783 | 47,484 | 64,868 | ||||||||||
Balance sheet data: | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets | 221.2 | 221.2 | 221.2 | 221.2 | 228.4 | |||||||||||
Total assets | 1,082.2 | 976.9 | 983.4 | 775.4 | 893.8 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt | 190.0 | 190.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities | 558.6 | 519.8 | 614.3 | 455.3 | 512.1 | |||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 523.6 | 457.1 | 369.1 | 320.1 | 381.7 |
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Item contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect the current views and assumptions of management with respect to future events regarding our business and the industry in general. These forward-looking statements include all statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, including statements with respect to revenues and earnings, the amount and composition of assets under management, distribution sources, expense levels, redemption rates and the financial markets and other conditions. These statements are generally identified by the use of words such as "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "forecast," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project," "outlook," "will," "potential" and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of the Company is not a guarantee of future performance. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed in the "Risk Factors" section of this Form 10-K, which include, without limitation, the adverse effect from a decline in securities markets or in the relative investment performance of our products, our inability to pay future dividends, the loss of existing distribution channels or the inability to access new ones, a reduction of the assets we manage on short notice, and adverse results of litigation and/or arbitration. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The following should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
Executive Overview
We are one of the oldest mutual fund and asset management firms in the country, with expertise in a broad range of investment styles and across a variety of market environments. Our earnings and cash flows are heavily dependent on financial market conditions. Significant increases or decreases in the various securities markets particularly United States equity markets, can have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Revenue Sources
We derive our revenues primarily from providing investment management, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration to mutual funds and institutional and separately managed accounts. Investment management fees a substantial source of our revenues, are based on the amount of average assets under management and are affected by sales levels, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. UnderwritingOur underwriting and distribution revenues, another substantial source of revenues consist of commissions derived from sales of investment and insurance products, Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees, distribution fees on certain variable products, and fees earned on fee-based asset allocation products, as well asand related advisory services. The products sold have various commission structures and the revenues received from productthose sales vary based on the type and amount sold. Rule 12b-1Shareholder service and distribution fees earned for servicing and/or distributing certain mutual fund shares are based upon assets under management and fluctuate based on sales, redemptions and financial market conditions. Other service fees includefee revenue includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees forfrom retirement plan accounts, portfolio accounting and portfolio accounting.administration fees, and is earned based on assets under management or number of client accounts.
Expense Drivers
Our major expenses are underwriting and distribution-related commissions, employee compensation, amortization of deferred sales commissions, subadvisory fee expenses and information technology expense.
Our Distribution Channels
One of our distinctive qualities is that we are a significant distributor of investment products. Our retail products are distributed through our Advisors channel sales force of independent financial advisors or through our Wholesale channel, which includes third-parties such as other broker/dealers, registered
investment advisors (including the retirement advisors of Legend) and various retirement platforms. We also market our investment advisory services to institutional investors, either directly or through consultants, in our Institutional channel.
In theOur Advisors channel our sales force consists of 2,3661,816 independent financial advisors providing personal financial planning services to our clients acrossspread throughout the United States, focusing on investment strategieswho carry out our mission of providing financial planning for retirement, education funding, insurance, estate planning and other specific needs.financial needs for our clients. A distinguishing aspect of this channel is its industry low redemption rate, which can be attributed to the personal nature in which our advisors provide service to their clients.
InDuring the past two years, we experienced a decline in our number of financial advisors; however, the decline was not unexpected as we continue to push for higher production from our advisors by increasing minimum production requirements for them to stay licensed with us. Our gross revenue production per advisor increased to $156 thousand, or 31%, and gross sales in the channel increased to $3.8 billion, or 5%, during 2011 compared to 2010 despite the decrease in advisor headcount. The recruiting and training of our advisors is a significant effort, so we continue to focus our recruiting efforts on bringing in experienced advisors.
Our Wholesale channel, weChannel efforts are led by the solid performance record of the Ivy Funds family. We distribute retail mutual funds through broker/dealers and registered investment advisors, including Legend, our Florida-based retirement planning subsidiary and various retirement platforms. Aplatforms, through a team of 35external, internal and hybrid wholesalers as well as a team dedicated to national wholesalers leadaccounts. This is our fastest growing distribution channel with sales growth averaging 36% per year since 2007 while assets under management have grown from $10.8 billion to $41.0 billion during the same period.
The Ivy Funds maintain strong positions on many of the leading third-party distribution platforms, and we continue efforts to diversify our sales by offering other solid performing funds besides our flagship Ivy Asset Strategy fund to our partners. During 2011, we had 10 funds exceed gross sales of $250 million compared to eight in this channel.2010 and six in 2009. Sales of products other than our Ivy Asset Strategy fund accounted for 53% of total sales during 2011 compared to 40% during 2010 and 37% for 2009. We expect the Wholesale Channel to be critical to driving our organic growth rate in the coming years.
Through our Institutional channel we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for defined benefit pension plans, other investment companies (as a subadvisor), defined contribution plans, endowmentsvariety of types of institutions. The largest percentage of our clients hire us to act as subadvisor for their branded products; they are typically distributors who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market multi-manager styles. This is the smallest of our three distribution channels but has recently experienced positive gross sales and high net worth clients.flow trends due to our growing subadvisory relationships. Our subadvisory relationships currently account for more than 60% of the channel's $10.5 billion in assets at the end of 2011.
Market Developments
During the past fiscal year, we operated in a period of high volatility in the financial markets. OverInvestors moved away from portfolio risk and into cash, and were willing to accept minimal returns rather than expose themselves to the twelve month periodhighly unpredictable equity market. Through this volatile year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined 34%Company increased gross sales by 10%, generated net flows of $5.0 billion and the Standard & Poor's 500 Index declined 38%. Almost every class of financial assets experienced significant price declines and high volatility. Although the U.S. government took stepsmaintained stable redemption rates compared to stabilize the financial markets and the banking system and ensure continued availability of commercial and consumer credit, the economic outlook remains uncertain and we anticipate a challenging business climate inindustry averages. Market depreciation during 2011 offset net flows achieved during the year ahead.
Consequences of Market Developments
Due to ourand as a result, assets under management at year-end being substantially less thanDecember 31, 2011 decreased $0.5 billion compared to December 31, 2010.
Operating Results
The company ended the year with $1.2 billion in revenues. Revenue increases relative to fiscal 2010 were reflective of an increase in our average managed assets and positive net flows. Average assets under management forwere $87.1 billion in 2011 compared to $74.0 billion in 2010.
Net income increased 12% compared to 2010 while our operating margin improved slightly above the 24% achieved during 2010. We plan to continue our focus on cost controls during 2012.
Our balance sheet remains strong, as we ended the year we will likely experience a significant decline in revenues in 2009 unless market conditions improve.
We took steps in the fourth quarterwith cash and investments of 2008 to manage our expenses in response to current market conditions; however, we expect our net income and operating margins may be adversely affected, especially in the near future.
During the fourth quarter of 2008 we offered a voluntary separation program to our employees that included enhanced severance benefits. A total of 169 employees accepted the program, which for most was effective by December 31, 2008. Related to this program, we recorded a restructuring charge of $16.5 million in general and administrative expenses. The restructuring charge includes $0.7 million for termination of various projects under development.$462.6 million. We also reversed $7.9entered into an agreement in 2010 to complete a $190.0 million private placement of previously recorded bonus accrualsSenior Notes, which contained a delayed funding provision and allowed us to reflect lower bonus awards for 2008.
Duedraw down the proceeds on January 13, 2011 when the existing senior notes matured. The proceeds were used to significant asset redemption activity and our review ofrefinance the recoverability of our deferred sales commission assetssenior unsecured notes that expired in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded $6.5 million in additional amortization ($0.7 million related to Class B shares and $5.8 million related to Class C shares), partially offset by higher CDSC revenue received during the fourth quarter as a result of higher redemption activity.
Based on a review of goodwill and intangibles in the fourth quarter, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $7.2 million related to ACF based on declines in ACF's assets under management and the related adverse impact on its earnings potential.January 2011.
Assets Under Management
Assets under management of $47.5$83.2 billion on December 31, 2008 were 27% lower than2011 decreased slightly compared to the $64.9$83.7 billion reported a year earlierago. Net sales of $4.3 billion, generated primarily due toby the Wholesale and Institutional channels, were offset by market depreciation of $25.4$5.5 billion. Almost 90% of the year's market depreciation occurred during the last six months of the year. Net sales of $7.8 billion ($7.1 billion of which was generated by the Wholesale channel) partially offset market declines and increased redemptions.
Change in Assets Under Management (1) (1)
| Advisors Channel | Wholesale Channel | Institutional Channel | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||||||
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Beginning Assets | $ | 34,562 | 21,537 | 8,769 | 64,868 | |||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | 3,724 | 15,599 | 2,359 | 21,682 | ||||||||
Redemptions | (3,771) | (8,541) | (1,561) | (13,873) | ||||||||
Net Sales | (47) | 7,058 | 798 | 7,809 | ||||||||
Net Exchanges | (150) | 145 | - | (5) | ||||||||
Reinvested Dividends and Capital Gains | 325 | (271) | 119 | 173 | ||||||||
Net Flows | 128 | 6,932 | 917 | 7,977 | ||||||||
Market Depreciation | (11,218) | (10,980) | (3,163) | (25,361) | ||||||||
Ending Assets | $ | 23,472 | 17,489 | 6,523 | 47,484 | |||||||
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||
Beginning Assets | $ | 29,905 | 10,819 | 7,677 | 48,401 | |||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | 3,551 | 9,470 | 1,883 | 14,904 | ||||||||
Redemptions | (3,829) | (2,795) | (2,128) | (8,752) | ||||||||
Net Sales | (278) | 6,675 | (245) | 6,152 | ||||||||
Net Exchanges | (180) | 173 | - | (7) | ||||||||
Reinvested Dividends and Capital Gains | 245 | (24) | 105 | 326 | ||||||||
Net Flows | (213) | 6,824 | (140) | 6,471 | ||||||||
Market Appreciation | 4,870 | 3,894 | 1,232 | 9,996 | ||||||||
Ending Assets | $ | 34,562 | 21,537 | 8,769 | 64,868 | |||||||
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Beginning Assets | $ | 27,187 | 6,729 | 7,947 | 41,863 | |||||||
Sales (net of commissions) | 3,216 | 4,541 | 968 | 8,725 | ||||||||
Redemptions | (3,325) | (1,915) | (1,748) | (6,988) | ||||||||
Net Sales | (109) | 2,626 | (780) | 1,737 | ||||||||
Net Exchanges | (194) | 185 | - | (9) | ||||||||
Reinvested Dividends and Capital Gains | 232 | 16 | 111 | 359 | ||||||||
Net Flows | (71) | 2,827 | (669) | 2,087 | ||||||||
Market Appreciation | 2,789 | 1,263 | 399 | 4,451 | ||||||||
Ending Assets | $ | 29,905 | 10,819 | 7,677 | 48,401 | |||||||
| Advisors Channel | Wholesale Channel | Institutional Channel | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | |||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||
Beginning Assets | $33,181 | 40,883 | 9,609 | 83,673 | ||||
Sales (net of commissions) | 3,800 | 16,594 | 3,413 | 23,807 | ||||
Redemptions | (4,047) | (12,995) | (2,479) | (19,521) | ||||
Net Sales | (247) | 3,599 | 934 | 4,286 | ||||
Net Exchanges | (262) | 261 | - | (1) | ||||
Reinvested Dividends and Capital Gains | 353 | 279 | 112 | 744 | ||||
Net Flows | (156) | 4,139 | 1,046 | 5,029 | ||||
Market Depreciation | (1,316) | (4,068) | (161) | (5,545) | ||||
Ending Assets | $31,709 | 40,954 | 10,494 | 83,157 | ||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Beginning Assets | $29,474 | 32,818 | 7,491 | 69,783 | ||||
Sales (net of commissions) | 3,616 | 14,505 | 3,588 | 21,709 | ||||
Redemptions | (3,526) | (10,560) | (2,874) | (16,960) | ||||
Net Sales | 90 | 3,945 | 714 | 4,749 | ||||
Net Exchanges | (308) | 190 | 116 | (2) | ||||
Reinvested Dividends and Capital Gains | 338 | 237 | 114 | 689 | ||||
Net Flows | 120 | 4,372 | 944 | 5,436 | ||||
Market Appreciation | 3,587 | 3,693 | 1,174 | 8,454 | ||||
Ending Assets | $33,181 | 40,883 | 9,609 | 83,673 | ||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||
Beginning Assets | $23,472 | 17,489 | 6,523 | 47,484 | ||||
Disposition of Assets | - | - | (488) | (488) | ||||
Sales (net of commissions) | 3,202 | 14,745 | 1,703 | 19,650 | ||||
Redemptions | (3,052) | (5,951) | (1,942) | (10,945) | ||||
Net Sales | 150 | 8,794 | (239) | 8,705 | ||||
Net Exchanges | (197) | 150 | 41 | (6) | ||||
Reinvested Dividends and Capital Gains | 329 | 124 | 113 | 566 | ||||
Net Flows | 282 | 9,068 | (85) | 9,265 | ||||
Market Appreciation | 5,720 | 6,261 | 1,541 | 13,522 | ||||
Ending Assets | $29,474 | 32,818 | 7,491 | 69,783 | ||||
Average assets under management, which are generally more indicative of trends in revenue for providing investment management services than the year over year change in ending assets under management, increased by 13% as18% compared to 2007. However, average assets under management for the fourth quarter of 2008 were $48.4 billion, a 23% decrease from the fourth quarter average of $62.5 billion in 2007. The significant decline in our assets under management which took place in the second half of 2008 will continue to drive down our average assets under management if market conditions do not improve.2010.
Average Assets Under Management
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Percentage of Total | Average | Percentage of Total | Average | Percentage of Total | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distribution Channel: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Advisors Channel | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 24,201 | 80% | 27,048 | 84% | 23,821 | 84% | |||||||||||||
Fixed income | 4,490 | 15% | 4,154 | 13% | 3,901 | 14% | ||||||||||||||
Money market | 1,428 | 5% | 1,046 | 3% | 798 | 2% | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 30,119 | 100% | 32,248 | 100% | 28,520 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Wholesale Channel | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 23,268 | 98% | 14,395 | 97% | 8,499 | 95% | |||||||||||||
Fixed income | 413 | 2% | 380 | 3% | 344 | 4% | ||||||||||||||
Money market | 152 | 0% | 64 | 0% | 70 | 1% | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 23,833 | 100% | 14,839 | 100% | 8,913 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Institutional Channel | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 7,445 | 93% | 7,199 | 92% | 7,120 | 92% | |||||||||||||
Fixed income | 584 | 7% | 614 | 8% | 624 | 8% | ||||||||||||||
Money market | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,029 | 100% | 7,813 | 100% | 7,744 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Total by Asset Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 54,914 | 89% | 48,642 | 89% | 39,440 | 87% | |||||||||||||
Fixed income | 5,487 | 9% | 5,148 | 9% | 4,869 | 11% | ||||||||||||||
Money market | 1,580 | 2% | 1110 | 2% | 868 | 2% | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 61,981 | 100% | 54,900 | 100% | 45,177 | 100% | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Percentage of Total | Average | Percentage of Total | Average | Percentage of Total | |||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||||
Distribution Channel: | |||||||||||||||||||
Advisors Channel | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 24,477 | 73% | 22,430 | 74% | 18,916 | 74% | ||||||||||||
Fixed income | 7,629 | 23% | 6,614 | 22% | 5,211 | 20% | |||||||||||||
Money market | 1,203 | 4% | 1,288 | 4% | 1,600 | 6% | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 33,309 | 100% | 30,332 | 100% | 25,727 | 100% | ||||||||||||
Wholesale Channel | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 39,387 | 91% | 32,805 | 92% | 22,556 | 94% | ||||||||||||
Fixed income | 3,684 | 8% | 2,385 | 7% | 1,147 | 5% | |||||||||||||
Money market | 320 | 1% | 284 | 1% | 301 | 1% | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 43,391 | 100% | 35,474 | 100% | 24,004 | 100% | ||||||||||||
Institutional Channel | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 9,627 | 93% | 7,467 | 91% | 6,208 | 90% | ||||||||||||
Fixed income | 780 | 7% | 732 | 9% | 658 | 10% | |||||||||||||
Money market | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 10,407 | 100% | 8,199 | 100% | 6,866 | 100% | ||||||||||||
Total by Asset Class: | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 73,491 | 84% | 62,702 | 85% | 47,680 | 85% | ||||||||||||
Fixed income | 12,093 | 14% | 9,731 | 13% | 7,016 | 12% | |||||||||||||
Money market | 1,523 | 2% | 1,572 | 2% | 1,901 | 3% | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 87,107 | 100% | 74,005 | 100% | 56,597 | 100% | ||||||||||||
The following table summarizes our five largest mutual funds as of December 31, 20082011 by ending assets under management and investment management fees for the last three years. The assets under management and management fees of our five largest mutual funds are presented as a percentage of our total assets under management and total management fees.
Five Largest Mutual Funds by Ending Assets Under Management and Investment Management Fees
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ending | Percentage of Total | Ending | Percentage of Total | Ending | Percentage of Total | ||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||||||
By Assets Under Management: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy | $ | 10,430 | 22% | 8,419 | 14% | 2,008 | 4% | |||||||||||||
Ivy Global Natural Resources | 2,618 | 5% | 8,464 | 15% | 4,519 | 9% | ||||||||||||||
Advisors Asset Strategy | 2,411 | 5% | 3,118 | 5% | 1,899 | 4% | ||||||||||||||
Advisors Core Investment | 2,377 | 5% | 4,240 | 7% | 4,155 | 9% | ||||||||||||||
Advisors Science & Technology | 1,670 | 4% | 2,851 | 5% | 2,521 | 5% | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 19,506 | 41% | 27,092 | 46% | 15,102 | 31% | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
By Management Fees: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy | $ | 71,957 | 18% | 24,802 | 7% | 7,094 | 2% | |||||||||||||
Ivy Global Natural Resources (1) | 56,247 | 14% | 50,944 | 14% | 31,454 | 10% | ||||||||||||||
Advisors Core Investment | 21,053 | 5% | 25,861 | 7% | 25,635 | 8% | ||||||||||||||
Advisors Asset Strategy | 19,966 | 5% | 15,696 | 4% | 10,654 | 3% | ||||||||||||||
Advisors Science & Technology | 19,202 | 5% | 22,310 | 6% | 20,676 | 7% | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 188,425 | 47% | 139,613 | 38% | 95,513 | 30% | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ending | Percentage of Total | Ending | Percentage of Total | Ending | Percentage of Total | |||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||||
By Assets Under Management: | |||||||||||||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy | $ | 23,642 | 28% | 25,106 | 30% | 20,029 | 29% | ||||||||||||
Ivy Global Natural Resources | 4,332 | 5% | 6,252 | 7% | 5,736 | 8% | |||||||||||||
Ivy High Income | 3,197 | 4% | 1,694 | 2% | 1,097 | 2% | |||||||||||||
Advisors Asset Strategy | 2,772 | 3% | 3,328 | 4% | 3,235 | 5% | |||||||||||||
Advisors Core Investment | 2,724 | 3% | 2,888 | 3% | 2,657 | 4% | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 36,667 | 43% | 39,268 | 46% | 32,754 | 48% | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||||||
By Management Fees: | |||||||||||||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy | $ | 146,649 | 28% | 123,638 | 27% | 82,313 | 23% | ||||||||||||
Ivy Global Natural Resources (1) | 46,324 | 9% | 43,839 | 10% | 34,353 | 10% | |||||||||||||
Advisors Asset Strategy | 20,465 | 4% | 20,402 | 4% | 18,139 | 5% | |||||||||||||
Advisors Science & Technology | 19,208 | 3% | 18,379 | 4% | 15,953 | 4% | |||||||||||||
Advisors Core Investment | 18,297 | 3% | 16,976 | 4% | 15,118 | 4% | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 250,943 | 47% | 223,234 | 49% | 165,876 | 46% | ||||||||||||
Results of Operations
Fourth Quarter 2008
Due to the effects of the negative market developments summarized earlier, we experienced a significant decline in assets under management and associated revenues concentrated in the last six months of 2008. These declines were a contributing factor to several actions taken by the company during the fourth quarter which resulted in one-time charges to our income statement. The table below details the components of operating income for the quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Significant changes to individual line items are summarized below.
| For the Quarter Ended December 31, | Variance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 vs. 2007 | |||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 76,397 | 105,296 | -27% | ||||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 89,343 | 106,345 | -16% | |||||||
Shareholder service fees | 25,304 | 24,476 | 3% | |||||||
Total revenues | 191,044 | 236,117 | -19% | |||||||
Underwriting and distribution | 114,164 | 122,745 | - -7% | |||||||
Compensation and related costs | 21,140 | 31,901 | -34% | |||||||
General and administrative | 32,894 | 13,819 | 138% | |||||||
Subadvisory fees | 5,385 | 12,532 | -57% | |||||||
Depreciation | 3,481 | 3,140 | 11% | |||||||
Goodwill impairment | 7,222 | - | NM | |||||||
Total operating expenses | 184,286 | 184,137 | 0% | |||||||
Operating income | $ | 6,758 | 51,980 | -87% | ||||||
Investment management fee revenue declined due to an average asset decline in the fourth quarter of 2008 of 23% compared to last year's fourth quarter. A lower effective management fee rate (62.8 basis points in the current quarter compared to 66.9 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2007) also impacted revenues. The decline in rate is due to a mix-shift in assets under management to lower fee products. A significant decrease in underwriting and distribution fee revenue of $14.0 million occurred in the Advisors channel compared to the same period last year, primarily due to lower Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees based on a decline in average assets under management. The decrease was partially offset by increased revenues related to the sale of insurance products of $1.7 million and fee-based asset allocation products of $1.4 million. CDSC revenues also increased $2.7 million in the Wholesale channel compared to the prior year due to higher redemptions in 2008.
Due to significant asset redemption activity and our review of the recoverability of our deferred sales commission assets in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded $6.5 million in additional amortization ($0.7 million related to Class B shares and $5.8 million related to Class C shares), partially offset by higher CDSC revenue recorded during the fourth quarter based on higher redemptions. Amortization of deferred sales commission assets is included in Underwriting and distribution expense in the statements of income.
Compensation and related costs were lower in this year's fourth quarter primarily due to the reversal of previously accrued bonuses of $7.9 million and an overall lower bonus pool in 2008 to reflect current market and economic conditions. General and administrative expenses increased significantly due to the
restructuring charge of $16.5 million. Subadvisory fees declined due to the decline in subadvised average assets under management ($5.0 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to $12.0 billion in the same quarter last year). We also recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $7.2 million in this year's fourth quarter related to ACF based on declines in ACF's assets under management and the related adverse impact on its earnings potential.
Our available for sale investment portfolio had unrealized losses of $6.2 million as of December 31, 2008. If market conditions persist and the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, it is possible that future periods could include the realization of these losses as a charge to net income.
Fiscal Year 2008
Net Income
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 96,163 | 125,497 | 46,112 | -23% | 172% | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.17 | 1.55 | 0.57 | -25% | 172% | ||||||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.15 | 1.52 | 0.55 | -24% | 176% | ||||||||||
Operating Margin | 18% | 23% | 12% | -5% | 11% |
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 175,459 | 156,959 | 105,505 | 12% | 49% | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.23 | 12% | 49% | ||||||||||
Diluted | $ | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.23 | 12% | 49% | ||||||||||
Operating Margin | 24% | 24% | 20% | 0% | 4% |
We reported net income of $96.2$175.5 million, or $1.15$2.05 per diluted share, in 20082011 compared to $125.5$157.0 million, or $1.52$1.83 per diluted share, in 20072010 and $46.1$105.5 million, or $0.55$1.23 per diluted share, in 2006.
Operating results for 2008 include a restructuring charge of $16.5 million, a goodwill impairment charge of $7.2 million related to our subsidiary ACF based on declines in ACF's assets under management and the related adverse impact on its earnings potential and $6.5 million in additional amortization to reduce our deferred acquisition cost asset.
Operating results for 2006 include a charge of $55.0 million related to our settlement with the SEC, the New York Attorney General and the Kansas Securities Commission regarding market timing allegations, $12.0 million of which represented non-deductible penalties. During 2006 we also recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $20.0 million related to ACF based on the negative impact of the decline in ACF's assets under management and diminished involvement of ACF's investment staff in mutual fund advisory responsibilities, which adversely impacted its earnings potential. Fiscal 2006 also included a restructuring charge of $1.9 million at ACF for employee separation costs, in response to a decline in investment performance and related loss of assets under management.2009.
Special Items Included in 2009 Results of Operations
As previously disclosed, on July 15, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary, ACF, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated June 26, 2009. Prior to the closing date, ACF had 10 employees and assets under management of $488.0 million. The agreement included an earnout provision based on a percentage of revenues on existing accounts over the three-year period subsequent to the closing date. The earnout provision was fully settled with a payment received during 2010. For tax purposes, this sale resulted in a capital loss of $28.4 million, a portion of which was utilized to offset capital gains in that and prior periods.
Operating results for 2009 include charges for severance and other transaction costs of $1.1 million in connection with the divestiture of our investment in ACF and are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income. We also recorded a charge of $3.7 million in investment and other income in the consolidated statement of income to reflect the "other than temporary" decline in value of certain of the Company's investments in affiliated mutual funds as the fair value of these investments had been below cost for an extended period.
Total Revenues
Total revenues increased 10% and 17% for the fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively,14% in 2011 compared to 2010, attributable to growthan increase in average assets under management of 13%18% and 22% for the two years.an increase in gross sales of 10%, while total revenues increased 25% in 2010 compared to 2009, attributable to an increase in average assets under management of 31% and an increase in gross sales of 10%.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 399,863 | 372,345 | 311,525 | 7% | 20% | ||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 416,762 | 371,085 | 317,458 | 12% | 17% | |||||||||||
Shareholder service fees | 102,495 | 94,124 | 89,672 | 9% | 5% | |||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 919,120 | 837,554 | 718,655 | 10% | 17% | ||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 530,599 | 457,538 | 354,593 | 16% | 29% | ||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 532,693 | 468,057 | 378,678 | 14% | 24% | |||||||||||
Shareholder service fees | 131,885 | 119,290 | 105,818 | 11% | 13% | |||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,195,177 | 1,044,885 | 839,089 | 14% | 25% | ||||||||||
Investment Management Fee Revenues
Investment management fee revenues are earned for providing investment advisory services to the Funds and to institutional and separate accounts. Investment management fee revenues increased $27.5$73.1 million, or 7%16%, in 20082011 and $60.8increased $102.9 million, or 20%29%, in 2007.2010.
Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds, which are distributed through the Advisors, Wholesale and the WholesaleInstitutional channels, were $364.7$490.0 million in 20082011 and increased $31.9$65.9 million, or 10%16%, compared to 2007,2010, while the related retail average assets increased 15%17%. Investment management fee revenues increased less than the related retail average assets due to significant sales growth in our Asset Strategy funds, which have lower than averagethe effect of recording management fee rates. Investmentwaivers as an offset to investment management fees beginning in the third quarter of 2010. Of the total management fee revenueswaivers recorded in 2007 were impacted by the decrease in management fee rates on certain funds in compliance with the New York Attorney General settlement that took place in the fourth quarter2011 of 2006 and has reduced management fees by approximately $5.0$8.4 million, on an annual basis.$5.7 million related to money market accounts. Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds were $332.8$424.1 million in 20072010 and increased $62.6$97.8 million, or 23%30%, compared to 2006,2009, while the related retail average assets increased 26%32%. Retail sales in 2008 and 2007 were $19.3$20.4 billion, $18.1 billion and $13.0$17.9 billion respectively, representing a 48%in 2011, 2010 and 68% increase over sales2009, respectively.
Prior to the sale of ACF effective July 15, 2009, ACF had assets under management of $488.0 million, which along with related investment management fee revenues, were previously included in 2007 and 2006, respectively, with the majority of the growth in retail sales occurring in our WholesaleInstitutional channel.
Institutional and separate account revenues were $35.2$40.6 million, $39.5$33.4 million and $41.3$28.3 million in 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively. The decreaseincrease in account revenues in 20082011 compared to 2010 was primarily attributable to a management fee rate decrease on certain institutional accounts. The decrease27% increase in accountaverage assets while the increase in revenues in 20072010 compared to 2009 was attributable to a declineresult of a 19% increase in ACF's average assets by 27% and a management fee rate decrease on certain institutional accounts.assets.
Long-term redemption rates (which exclude money market fund redemptions) in the Advisors channel improved to 8.9%were 10.0% in 20082011 compared to 9.1%9.3% and 9.2%8.4% in 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively. In the Wholesale channel, long-term redemption rates were 35.5%29.5% in 2008, an increase from 18.5%2011, compared to 29.3% in 20072010 and 21.0%24.0% in 2006. The Wholesale channel's elevated rate in 2008 is a direct consequence of the volatility in the financial markets which occurred during the second half of the year and includes a 75.2% fourth quarter redemption rate.2009. We expect the Advisors channel long-term redemption rate to remain lower than that of the Wholesale channel due to the personal and customized nature in which our financial advisors provide service to our clients.
The long-term redemption rate for our Institutional channel was 19.4%23.8% in 20082011 compared to 27.2%35.1% in 20072010 and 22.6%28.3% in 2006.2009. Subadvisory and defined contribution pension business comprise more than 60% of the Institutional channel's assets as of December 31, 2011 and unlike defined benefit pension accounts, the active daily flows in or out of these accounts can result in an increase in contributions and withdrawals and impact the channel's redemption rate.
Underwriting and Distribution
We earn underwriting and distribution fee revenues primarily by distributing the Funds pursuant to an underwriting agreement with each Fund (except the Ivy Funds VIP as explained below) and, to a lesser extent, by distributing mutual funds offered by other unaffiliated companies. Pursuant to each agreement, we offer and sell the Funds' shares on a continuous basis (open-end funds) and pay certain costs associated with underwriting and distributing the Funds, including the costs of developing and producing sales literature and printing of prospectuses, which may be either partially or fully reimbursed by the Funds. The higher institutionalFunds are sold in various classes that are structured in ways that conform to industry standards (i.e., "front-end load," "back-end load," "level-load" and institutional).
When a client purchases Class A shares (front-end load), the client pays an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested. The sales charge for Class A shares typically declines as the investment amount increases. In addition, investors may combine their purchases of all fund shares to qualify for a reduced sales charge. Class A shares purchased at net asset value are assessed a 1% contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") if the shares are redeemed within 12 months of purchase. When a client invests in an asset allocation product, Class A shares are purchased at net asset value. We do not charge an initial sales charge, but investors are assessed a CDSC upon early redemption rateof shares, up to 3% of the amount originally invested and declining to zero for investments held more than three years. When a client purchases Class B shares (back-end load), we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge a CDSC upon early redemption of shares, up to 5% of the lesser of the current market net asset value or the purchase cost of the redeemed shares in 2007,the first year and declining to zero for shares held for more than six years. Class B shares convert to Class A shares after seven years. When a client purchases Class C shares (level-load), we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge investors who redeem their Class C shares in the first year a CDSC of 1% of the current market net asset value or the purchase cost of the shares redeemed, whichever is less.
Under a Rule 12b-1 service plan, the Funds may charge a maximum fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets under management for expenses paid to broker/dealers and other sales professionals in connection with providing ongoing services to the Funds' shareholders and/or maintaining the Funds' shareholder accounts, with the exception of the Funds' Class R shares, for which the maximum fee is based on total0.50%. The Funds' Class B and Class C shares may charge a maximum of 0.75% of the average daily net
redemptionsassets under management under a Rule 12b-1 distribution plan to broker/dealers and other sales professionals for their services in connection with distributing shares of that class. The Rule 12b-1 plans are subject to annual approval by the Funds' board of trustees, including a majority of the disinterested members, by votes cast in person at a meeting called for the periodpurpose of $2.1 billion, reflected redemptionsvoting on such approval. All Funds may terminate the service plan at any time with approval of fund trustees or portfolio shareholders (a majority of either) without penalty.
We distribute variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP as investment vehicles pursuant to general agency arrangements with our business partners and receive commissions, marketing allowances and other compensation as stipulated by such agreements. In connection with these arrangements, the Ivy Funds VIP are offered and sold on a continuous basis.
In addition to distributing variable products, we distribute a number of other insurance products through our insurance agency subsidiaries, including individual term life, group term life, whole life, accident and health, long-term care, Medicare supplement and disability insurance. We receive commissions and compensation from various underwriters for distributing these products. We are not an underwriter for any insurance policies.
We also offer asset allocation investment advisory products that utilize our Funds. These products offer clients a selection of traditional asset allocation models, as well as features such as systematic rebalancing and client and advisor participation in determining asset allocation across multipleasset classes. We earn asset-based fees on our asset allocation investment disciplines, including large cap growth, small cap growth, core equity and international growth.advisory products.
Underwriting and Distribution Fee Revenues and Expenses
The following tables illustrate our underwriting and distribution fee revenues and expenses segregated by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006:2009:
| Total | | | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 416,762 | 371,085 | 317,458 | 12% | 17% | |||||||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||
Direct | 361,005 | 300,929 | 244,454 | 20% | 23% | ||||||||||||||
Indirect | 135,817 | 121,345 | 112,084 | 12% | 8% | ||||||||||||||
Total Expenses | 496,822 | 422,274 | 356,538 | 18% | 18% | ||||||||||||||
Net Underwriting & Distribution | $ | (80,060) | (51,189) | (39,080) | -56% | -31% | |||||||||||||
| Total | | | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 532,693 | 468,057 | 378,678 | 14% | 24% | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Direct | 470,050 | 409,912 | 325,836 | 15% | 26% | ||||||||||
Indirect | 145,981 | 133,692 | 124,089 | 9% | 8% | ||||||||||
Total Expenses | 616,031 | 543,604 | 449,925 | 13% | 21% | ||||||||||
Net Underwriting & Distribution | $ | (83,338) | (75,547) | (71,247) | -10% | -6% | |||||||||
| Advisors Channel | | | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | | |||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 235,343 | 238,210 | 225,313 | -1% | 6% | |||||||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||
Direct | 163,183 | 163,513 | 154,580 | 0% | 6% | ||||||||||||||
Indirect | 92,384 | 84,777 | 82,337 | 9% | 3% | ||||||||||||||
Total Expenses | 255,567 | 248,290 | 236,917 | 3% | 5% | ||||||||||||||
Net Underwriting & Distribution | $ | (20,224) | (10,080) | (11,604) | -101% | 13% | |||||||||||||
| Advisors Channel | | | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 290,077 | 252,107 | 213,258 | 15% | 18% | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Direct | 204,358 | 177,158 | 147,469 | 15% | 20% | ||||||||||
Indirect | 97,414 | 87,731 | 83,917 | 11% | 5% | ||||||||||
Total Expenses | 301,772 | 264,889 | 231,386 | 14% | 14% | ||||||||||
Net Underwriting & Distribution | $ | (11,695) | (12,782) | (18,128) | 9% | 29% | |||||||||
| Wholesale Channel | | | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | | |||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 181,419 | 132,875 | 92,145 | 37% | 44% | |||||||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||
Direct | 197,822 | 137,416 | 89,874 | 44% | 53% | ||||||||||||||
Indirect | 43,433 | 36,568 | 29,747 | 19% | 23% | ||||||||||||||
Total Expenses | 241,255 | 173,984 | 119,621 | 39% | 45% | ||||||||||||||
Net Underwriting & Distribution | $ | (59,836) | (41,109) | (27,476) | -46% | -50% | |||||||||||||
| Wholesale Channel | | | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 242,616 | 215,950 | 165,420 | 12% | 31% | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Direct | 265,692 | 232,754 | 178,367 | 14% | 30% | ||||||||||
Indirect | 48,567 | 45,961 | 40,172 | 6% | 14% | ||||||||||
Total Expenses | 314,259 | 278,715 | 218,539 | 13% | 28% | ||||||||||
Net Underwriting & Distribution | $ | (71,643) | (62,765) | (53,119) | -14% | -18% | |||||||||
The Advisors channel is the largest source of underwriting and distribution revenue, given that a significant amount of Wholesale mutual fund sales are load-waived, with the exception of investment product sales by Legend advisors. A portion of underwriting and distribution fee revenues in our Advisors channel are derived from sales commissions charged on front-end load products sold by our financial advisors, including mutual fund Class A shares (those sponsored by the Company and those underwritten by other non-proprietary mutual fund companies), variable annuities and financial planning fees. A significant amount of Wholesale mutual fund sales are load-waived. The remainder of underwriting and distribution revenues are received from Rule 12b-1 asset-based distribution and service fees earned on both load and load-waived and deferred-load products sold by our financial advisors and
third party intermediaries, asset-based fees earned on our asset allocation products, and commissions earned on the sale of other insurance products.
We divide the costs of underwriting and distribution into two components—components — direct costs and indirect costs. Direct selling costs fluctuate with sales volume, such as advisor commissions and commission overrides paid to field management, advisor incentive compensation, commissions paid to third parties and to our own wholesalers, and related overrides in our Wholesale channel. To a lesser extent, directDirect selling costs also fluctuate with assets under management, such as Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees paid to the same parties. Indirect selling costs are fixed costs that do not necessarily fluctuate with sales levels. Indirect costs include expenses incurred by our home office and field offices such as wholesaler salaries, marketing costs, promotion and distribution of our products through the Advisors and Wholesale channels; support and management of our financial advisors such as field office overhead, sales programs and technology infrastructure; and costs of managing and supporting our wholesale efforts through technology infrastructure and personnel. While the Institutional channel does have marketing expenses, those expenses are accounted for in our compensation and related costs and general and administrative expense lines instead of underwriting and distribution because of the channel's integration with our investment management division, its relatively small size and the fact that there are no Rule 12b-1 fees, loads, CDSCs, or any other charges to separate account clients except investment management fees.
We recover certain of our underwriting and distribution costs through Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees, which are paid by the Funds. We also have Rule 12b-1 service and/or distribution plans for the Ivy Funds, Ivy Funds VIP, InvestEd and Advisor Funds. All Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fee revenue received from the Funds is recorded on a gross basis.
Underwriting and distribution revenues earned in 2011 increased by $45.7$64.6 million, or 12%14%, in 2008 compared to 2007.2010. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased $33.4 million compared to the prior year as assets grew from $4.5 billion to $6.0 billion year over year. Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees increased $29.2 million compared to 2010 as a result of an increase in average mutual fund assets under management. Higher advisory fees and point of sale commissions earned by Legend increased revenue by $3.7 million compared to the prior year. Revenues from front-load product sales sold in the Advisors channel decreased by $4.5 million, however this overall decrease included an increase in variable annuity revenues of $7.5 million. Insurance-related revenues decreased $1.0 million compared to the prior year.
Underwriting and distribution revenues earned in 2010 increased by $89.4 million, or 24%, compared to 2009. A majority of the increase in revenues was due to higher Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees of $36.7$56.7 million as a result of an increase in average mutual fund assets under management. Additionally, revenuesRevenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased $11.5 million. CDSC revenues increased in$20.5 million compared to the Wholesale channel by $4.9 million due to higher redemptions in 2008, concentrated in the second half of theprior year. Revenue on front-load product sales sold in the Wholesale channel increased by $3.0 million but decreased in the Advisors channel by $4.5 million. Financial planning revenues decreased by $1.6 million. LowerHigher advisory fees Rule 12b-1 service fee revenues and point of sale commissions earned by Legend decreasedincreased revenue by $6.9$7.9 million compared to the prior year. Revenues from front-load product sales sold in the Advisors channel increased by $5.1 million, which included an increase in variable annuity revenues of $2.3 million year as their assets under administrationover year. Offsetting these increases, insurance-related revenues decreased from $5.1 billion at the beginning of 2008 to $3.5 billion at the end of the year.$2.7 million.
Underwriting and distribution revenuesexpenses in 2011 increased by $53.6$72.4 million, or 17%13%, in 2007 compared to 2006.with the prior year. A majoritysignificant part of thethis increase in revenues was dueattributable to higher Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution feesdirect expenses in the Wholesale channel of $45.7$32.9 million as a result of an increase in average mutual fund assets under management. Additionally, revenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased $3.6 million, primarily attributable to modified fee-based asset allocation products introduced in April 2007. The introduction of these products was a contributing factor to a decline in front-load product sales and a resulting decrease of $2.5 million related to revenue on front-load product sales sold in the Advisors channel. Higher advisory fees, Rule 12b-1 service fee revenues and point of sale commissions earned by Legend added another $6.8 million in revenue compared to the prior year as their assets under administration increased.
Underwriting and distribution expenses increased by $74.5 million, or 18%, in 2008, when compared with the prior year. A majority of this increase was attributed to higher direct expenses in the Wholesale channel of $60.4 million as a result of higher sales volume and an increase in average wholesale assets under management. Specifically, wemanagement year over year. We incurred higher dealer compensation paid to third party distributors, increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses increased dealer compensation paid to third party distributors,and higher wholesaler commissions, and higherpartially offset by lower amortization expense of deferred sales commissions. In 2008, based on significant asset redemption activity in the latter part of the year and our review of the recoverability of our deferred sales commission assets, we recorded $6.5 million in additional amortization ($0.7 million related to Class B shares and $5.8 million related to Class C shares). This additional expense was partially offset by higher
CDSC revenue of $2.0 million received in the fourth quarter due to higher redemptions. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel remained largely unchangedincreased $27.2 million, or 15%, compared to 2010 due to higher amortization expensefee-based asset allocation expenses of deferred sales commissions of $1.8$23.8 million, and higher Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution commissions of $1.4$6.4 million and higher amortization expense of deferred sales commissions of $0.9 million, partially offset by lower point of sale commissions on front-load product sales of $2.6 million and a $1.2 million decrease in financial planning fee expenses.insurance expenses of $0.7 million. The increase in indirect expenses in the Advisors channel of $7.6$9.7 million was due to increased convention, employee compensation and benefits information technology andexpenses, higher convention costs, increased field office expenses.expenses and higher expenses incurred beginning mid-year 2011 related to our electronic books and records conversion project. Expenses related to this conversion project are expected to run $1.0 million per quarter until mid-year 2012. The indirect expenses
increase of $6.9$2.6 million in the Wholesale channel was driven by higher costs associated with developing our non-proprietary distribution outlets. These costs include a $4.2 million increase for higher marketing costs for promotion and distribution of our products through the Wholesale channel based on higher sales volume and a $2.7 million increase in compensation expenses, partiallymostly due to adding more wholesalers during the year.higher employee compensation and benefits expense.
Underwriting and distribution expenses in 2010 increased by $65.7$93.7 million, or 18%21%, in 2007 when compared with the prior year.to 2009. A majoritysignificant part of this increase was attributedattributable to higher direct expenses in the Wholesale channel of $47.5$54.4 million as a result of higher sales volume and an increase in average Wholesalewholesale assets under management. Specifically, wemanagement, minimally offset by lower sales volume year over year. We incurred higher dealer compensation paid to third party distributors, increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses increased dealer compensation paid to third party distributors, higher wholesaler commissions and higher amortization expense of deferred sales commissions, partially offset by lower wholesaler commissions. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel increased $8.9$29.7 million, or 20%, compared to 2009 due to increased commissions related to the sale of fee-based asset allocation products of $13.8 million, higher Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution commissions of $23.3$12.3 million, higher point of sale commissions on front-load product sales of $4.6 million, partially offset by $12.6lower commissions on insurance products of $1.7 million. Indirect expenses increased a total of $9.6 million of deferred sales commissions capitalized in 2007 in association with our fee-based asset allocation products and a $1.8 million decrease in financial planning fee expenses.compared to 2009. The increase in indirect expenses in the Advisors channel of $2.4$3.8 million was due to increased sales supportemployee compensation and field officebenefits expenses partially offset by decreases in convention and recruiting expenses.information technology costs. The indirect expenses increase of $6.8$5.8 million in the Wholesale channel was driven by higher costs associated with developing our non-proprietary distribution outlets. These costs include a $5.2 million increase fordue to increased employee compensation and benefits expenses, higher marketing costs for promotion and distribution of our products through the Wholesale channel based on higher sales volumebusiness meeting and a $1.6 million increase in base salaries and payroll taxes primarily as a result of adding more wholesalers during 2007.travel expenses.
Shareholder Service Fee RevenuesFees Revenue
Shareholder service fee revenuesfees revenue primarily includeincludes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, and portfolio accounting and administration fees. Portfolio accounting and administration fees are asset-based revenues or account-based revenues, while transfer agency fees and custodian fees from retirement plan accounts are based on the number of client accounts.
During 2008 and 2007,2011, shareholder service feefees revenue increased by 9%$12.6 million, or 11%, over 2010, due to higher asset-based fees of $8.6 million year over year in certain share classes and 5%, respectively, compared$4.0 million attributable to 16% and 10% increases each yearaccount-based revenues, due to a 2% increase in the average number of client accounts. The
During 2010, shareholder service fees revenue increased $13.5 million, or 13%, over 2009. Of this increase, $8.3 million was due to higher asset-based fees year over year in certain share classes and $5.2 million was attributable to account-based revenues, due to a 7% increase in the average number of shareholder accounts grew to 3.56 million in 2008 compared to 3.06 million in 2007 and 2.79 million in 2006. Effective September 1, 2006, our servicing contract with the Funds was renegotiated, resulting in reduced fees received by us for servicing wholesaleclient accounts. Historically, our account growth has mirrored our growth in revenue; however, with this reduced fee structure for wholesale accounts, our future revenue growth will not necessarily be tied to overall account growth. A portion of the fee reduction for wholesale accounts was offset by negotiating a networking fee reimbursement with the Funds for amounts paid to third party broker/dealers.
Total Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $110.9$108.7 million, or 17%14%, in 20082011 compared to 20072010 primarily due to increased underwriting and distribution expense, a $16.5 million restructuring charge recorded inexpenses, compensation and related costs, and general and administrative expenses. Underwriting and a goodwill impairment charge in the current year.distribution expenses are discussed above.
Operating expenses increased $13.2$125.1 million, or 2%19%, in 20072010 compared to 20062009 primarily due to increased underwriting and distribution expenses and subadvisory fees, offset by litigation-related charges recorded in 2006 in generalcompensation and administrative and an impairment charge related to goodwill, also recorded in 2006. Underwriting and distribution expenses are discussed above.costs.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution | $ | 496,822 | 422,274 | 356,538 | 18% | 18% | ||||||||||
Compensation and related costs | 119,057 | 115,905 | 110,101 | 3% | 5% | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 76,370 | 48,487 | 100,604 | 58% | -52% | |||||||||||
Subadvisory fees | 41,122 | 43,844 | 30,758 | -6% | 43% | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 13,198 | 12,412 | 11,725 | 6% | 6% | |||||||||||
Goodwill impairment | 7,222 | - | 20,000 | NM | NM | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 753,791 | 642,922 | 629,726 | 17% | 2% | ||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution | $ | 616,031 | 543,604 | 449,925 | 13% | 21% | |||||||||
Compensation and related costs | 161,401 | 142,255 | 124,463 | 13% | 14% | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 80,533 | 66,703 | 58,034 | 21% | 15% | ||||||||||
Subadvisory fees | 29,885 | 27,823 | 23,202 | 7% | 20% | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 15,235 | 14,030 | 13,653 | 9% | 3% | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 903,085 | 794,415 | 669,277 | 14% | 19% | |||||||||
Compensation and Related Costs
Compensation and related costs in 20082011 increased $3.2$19.1 million, or 3%13%, compared to 2007.2010. Base salaries and payroll taxes contributed $6.3$7.3 million to the increase, primarily due to an increase in average headcount of 8.3%12% and annual merit increases during the current year. The voluntary separation program was effective for2011. Share-based compensation increased $6.1 million compared to 2010 primarily due to higher amortization expense associated with our April 2011, December 2010 and April 2010 grants of nonvested stock compared to grants that became fully vested in 2011. We had a majoritydecrease in capitalized software development activities of the 169 participants as$2.7 million, higher commission expense on managed and institutional accounts of December 31, 2008; therefore, we expect$1.5 million and experienced higher incentive compensation expense of $0.8 million and group insurance costs of $0.4 million.
Compensation and related costs in 2009 will be reduced from 2008 levels.2010 increased $17.8 million, or 14%, compared to 2009. Share-based compensation accounted for $5.3$9.8 million of the increase primarily due to higher amortization expense associated with our April 2007,2010, December 20072009 and April 20082009 grants of nonvested stock compared to grants that became fully vested in 2008. Group insurance costs increased $1.9 million compared to 2007 based on unfavorable claims experience. These expense increases were offset by decreased incentive compensation expense of $7.5 million and increased capitalized software development activities of $2.3 million, primarily due to technology initiatives associated with expansion of our brokerage capabilities and lower pension and savings plan costs of $1.2 million based on favorable investment returns on our pension assets experienced during 2007.
Compensation and related costs in 2007 increased $5.8 million, or 5%, compared to 2006. During 2006, we incurred charges of $1.9 million (which included $1.5 million of share-based compensation expense) at ACF in response to a decline in investment performance and related loss of assets under management. Excluding this charge, compensation and related costs increased by $7.7 million.2010. Base salaries and payroll taxes contributed $3.8$5.8 million to the increase, primarily due to an increase in average headcount of 4.3%6.1% and annual merit increases during 2007. Share-based2010. We also experienced higher incentive compensation accounted for $3.3expense of $2.8 million and higher savings plan costs of the increase primarily due to higher amortization expense associated with our December 2006 and April 2007 grants of nonvested stock compared to grants that became fully vested in December 2006 and throughout 2007. Incentive compensation also increased $2.0 million during 2007 due to investment performance incentives earned by our investment management division and increased executive management bonuses.$1.4 million. These expense increases were offset by increased capitalized software development activities of $1.0$1.5 million, primarily due to technology and compliance initiatives, associated with expansionand lower group insurance costs of our brokerage capabilities.
Table of Contents$0.8 million compared to 2009 based on favorable claims experience.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses are operating costs other than those related to compensation and to distribution efforts, including, but not limited to, computer services and software costs, telecommunications, facilities costs of our home offices, costs of professional services including legal and accounting, and insurance.
General and administrative expenses increased $27.9$13.8 million in 20082011 compared to 2007. Fiscal year 2008 included2010. Included in 2011 is a $16.5$1.8 million restructuring charge related to the voluntary separationwrite-off of 169 employeessoftware capitalization costs due to the discontinuation of use of certain software licenses. The remaining variance is due to increased dealer services costs of $4.1 million, costs incurred for our national branding campaign launched in the first quarter of 2011, higher computer services and software costs of $2.8 million and increased legal expenses of $2.4 million, partially offset by lower fund expenses of $0.7 million. Fee waivers were recorded as part of fund expenses prior to the terminationthird quarter of various projects under development. The $16.5 million charge was comprised2010. Fee waivers are now netted against management fee revenues.
General and administrative expenses increased $9.5$8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2007.2009. Higher costs for third party subaccounting and networking fees for certain share classes and computer services were primarily responsible for the current year increase.
General and administrative expenses decreased $52.1 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Fiscal year 2006 included a $55.0 million charge for the settlement with the SEC and state regulators. Excluding this charge, general and administrative expenses increased $2.9 million compared to 2006. Higher costs for computer services and fund expenses were primarily responsible for current year increase.
Goodwill Impairment
Due to the decline in the financial markets during the second half of 2008, we performed a review of goodwill and intangibles in the fourth quarter. We recorded an impairment charge of $7.2 million related to ACF goodwill based on declines in ACF's assets under management and the related adverse impact on its earnings potential. All goodwill related to ACF has now been written off.
In 2006, we recorded an impairment charge of $20.0 million related to ACF. Factors that led to this conclusion included, but were not limited to, the negative impact of the decline in ACF's assets under management and diminished involvement of ACF's investment staff in mutual fund advisory responsibilities during the second quarter of 2006. Continued asset redemptions placed significant risk on ACF's ability to achieve and maintain profitability, and therefore had adversely impacted its earnings potential.
Subadvisory Fees
Subadvisory fees represent fees paid to other asset managers for providing advisory services for certain mutual fund portfolios. These expenses reduce our operating margin since we pay out approximately half of our management fee revenue received from subadvised products.
Subadvisory expenses Gross management fee revenues for products subadvised by others were $59.3 million for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $41.1 million, $43.8 million and $30.8 million, respectively, while subadvised average assets under management were $10.2 billion, $10.4 billion and $7.1 billion for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008, 20072011 compared to $55.3 million and 2006, respectively. Significant sales growth$46.0 million for 2010 and 2009, respectively, due to an 8% increase in our Wholesale channel overaverage assets from 2010 to 2011 and a 22% increase in average assets from 2009 to 2010. Subadvisory expenses followed the same pattern for the past three years, particularly sales of our subadvised specialty mutual fund products, has driven increased expenses.years.
Subadvised assets under management at December 31, 2008 dropped2011 were $5.8 billion compared to $4.8 billion.the annual average of $7.3 billion for 2011. Since subadvisory expenses are a function of sales, redemptions and market action for subadvised assets, the lower asset base will likely result in a significant decrease to both gross management fee revenues and subadvisory expenses for the coming year. Subadvisory revenues will also decrease in 2009 based on the lower asset base. Revenues earned on the Ivy Global Natural Resources fund, which accounted for approximately 70% of our subadvisory fee revenues in 2008, are expected to decrease over 50% in 2009.
Other Income and Expenses
Investment and Other Income
Investment and other income for 2008 decreased by $13.3$6.7 million in 2011 compared to 2007. Mark-to-market adjustments to our trading portfolio accounted for $6.4 million of the decline. Losses2010. The current year included mark-to-market losses on mutual fund holdings in our trading portfolio were $5.5of $1.1 million compared to gains in 2010 of $900 thousand$5.1 million. Offsetting these declines were higher dividend income on available for sale mutual fund holdings of $1.0 million in 2007. There were no2011 compared to the prior year. In 2011 and 2010 we recorded write-downs of our investment in a limited partnership of $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively. We recorded realized gains fromon the sale of available-for-saleavailable for sale mutual fund holdings in 2008funds of $2.2 million during 2011 compared to $3.6$2.9 million in gains recorded on sales in 2007. Lower effective interest rates on cash and short-term investments in 2008, partially offset by higher average balances, also resulted in a reduction to investment income of $3.3 million.2010.
Investment and other income for 20072010 increased by $4.0$3.7 million compared to 2009. Included in 2009 was a non-cash charge of $3.7 million to reflect the "other than temporary" impairment of certain of the Company's investments in available for sale affiliated mutual funds as the fair value of those investments was below cost for an extended period. Excluding the impairment in 2009, investment and other income was unchanged from 2009 to 2010. We recorded realized gains on the sale of available for sale mutual funds of $2.9 million during 2010 compared to $2.6 million in 2009. Additional gains on our trading portfolio of $500 thousand compared to 2009 and the collection on a note receivable from a partnership interest that was written off in previous years also contributed to the year over 2006. The increaseyear change. Offsetting these gains was primarily attributable to $2.1 million related to increased interest on cash balances, a $1.0$1.5 million write-down of other investmentsour investment in 2006 and higher earnings of $0.5 million from mutual funds in the trading portfolio.a limited partnership during 2010.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $0.2was $11.4 million in 20082011 and $12.7 million in both 2010 and 2009. In January 2011 we completed the refinancing of our senior notes with more favorable terms, which resulted in lower interest expense in 2011 compared to the prior year due to increased2010 and 2009. We also experienced lower costs associated with our $175.0$125.0 million credit facility, which was renewedentered into in October 2008.
Interest expense decreased $0.3 million in 2007 compared to the prior year due to the refinancing of $200.0 million in senior notes in January of 2006, which had a lower interest rate than the old notes.August 2010.
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate was 38.5%37.9%, 37.0%36.3%, and 48.3%34.9% in 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively. During 2009, the Company sold a subsidiary, which generated a capital loss available for offsetting potential future and prior period capital gains. Due to the character of the loss and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, a valuation allowance was recorded on a portion of this capital loss. The higher effective tax rate in 2008 increased2011 was primarily a result of less utilization of the capital loss in 2011 as compared to 2007 primarily2010. During 2011, realized capital gains allowed for a release of the valuation allowance of
$0.4 million, which was recorded as a benefit to tax expense and, as a result, decreased our effective tax rate. In 2010, realized capital gains and an increase in the fair value of our investment portfolios allowed for the release of $2.7 million of the non-deductible goodwill impairment chargevaluation allowance, which was recorded during 2008.as a benefit to tax expense and, as a result, decreased our effective tax rate. The higher effective tax rate in 2010 over 2009 was primarily the result of less utilization of the capital losses in 2010 as compared to 2009.
Our 20082011 and 2010 effective tax rates, removing the effects of the valuation allowance, would have been 38.1% and 37.4%, respectively. Our 2009 effective tax rate, removing the effecteffects of this non-deductible charge,the loss on the sale of our subsidiary and the establishment of a corresponding valuation allowance, would have been 36.8%. The effective income tax rate, exclusive of the non-deductible goodwill impairment, decreased slightlyvaluation allowance, increased in 20082011 over that of 2007 due to the Company generating larger state tax incentives in 2008 than those generated in 2007. The lower effective tax rate in 2007 as compared to 2006 was mainly a result of the non-deductible goodwill impairment charge and non-deductible fines recorded during 2006. The 2006 effective tax rate, removing the effect of these non-deductible charges and state tax incentives recorded in 2006, would have been 36.4%. The slight increase in the 2007 rate as compared to the 2006 rate, excluding non-deductible charges and state tax incentives, was2010 due to changes in state legislation in jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
Tableoperates as well as a charge to tax expense in 2011 on tax positions for which the outcome is uncertain in tax years in which the statute of Contentslimitations remains open. The effective tax rate, exclusive of the subsidiary loss and valuation allowance, increased in 2010 over that of 2009 due to fewer state tax incentives related to capital expenditures made by the Company in 2010 as compared to 2009 and changes in state legislation in jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources:
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 vs. 2007 | 2007 vs. 2006 | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 210,328 | 263,914 | 163,887 | -20% | 61% | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - restricted | 48,713 | 99,886 | 32,629 | -51% | 206% | ||||||||||
Investment Securities | 58,684 | 50,913 | 48,129 | 15% | 6% | ||||||||||
Long-term debt | 199,969 | 199,955 | 199,942 | 0% | 0% | ||||||||||
Cash Flow Data: | |||||||||||||||
Operating cash flows | 124,377 | 128,111 | 93,011 | -3% | 38% | ||||||||||
Investing cash flows | (24,429) | (5,146) | (2,332) | 375% | 121% | ||||||||||
Financing cash flows | (153,534) | (22,938) | (63,486) | -569% | 64% |
| For the Year Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 vs. 2010 | 2010 vs. 2009 | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 327,083 | 195,315 | 244,359 | 67% | -20% | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - restricted | 50,569 | 81,197 | 72,941 | -38% | 11% | ||||||||||
Investment securities | 135,497 | 192,611 | (1) | 70,524 | -30% | 173% | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 190,000 | 189,999 | 199,984 | 0% | -5% | ||||||||||
Cash Flow Data: | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | 283,139 | (1) | 140,643 | 155,179 | 101% | -9% | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | (30,242) | (67,806) | (29,488) | -55% | 130% | ||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | (121,129) | (121,881) | (91,660) | 1% | -33% |
Our operations provide much of the cash necessary to fund our priorities, as follows:
Finance Internal Growth
We use cash to fund growth in our distribution channels. Our Wholesale channel, which has a higher cost to gather assets, requires cash outlays for wholesaler commissions and commissions to third parties on deferred load product sales. We continue to invest in our Advisors channel by providing additional support to our advisors through training opportunities, wholesaling efforts and enhanced technology tools.
Pay Dividends
The Board of Directors approved increasesan increase in the quarterly dividend on our common stock from $.15$0.20 per share to $.17$0.25 per share beginning with our firstfourth quarter 20072011 dividend, paid on MayFebruary 1, 2007 and from $.17 per share to $.19 per share beginning with our first quarter 2008 dividend, paid on May 1, 2008.2012. Dividends on our common stock resulted in financing cash outflows of $63.7$68.8 million, $55.4$65.2 million and $50.6$65.0 million in 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively.
Repurchase Our Stock
In 2008,both 2011 and 2010, we repurchased 3.32.0 million of our shares, compared to 2.4 million shares and 1.11.9 million shares in 20072009. These share repurchase amounts included 494,207 shares, 426,665 shares and 2006,327,301 shares from employees who elected to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings with respect to vesting of stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In the future, we plan to repurchase shares, at a minimum, to offset dilution from shares issued for employee share plans. Additionally, during 2009During 2012, we expect toestimate that we will repurchase approximately 374,000575 thousand shares from employees who elect to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings arising from the vesting of nonvested shares.
Operating Cash Flows
CashExcluding the cash flows from operating activities generated from the maturity of U.S. treasuries and commercial paper in 2011 of $66.0 million, the remaining increase is due to higher net income and non-cash share-based compensation expense in 2011.
The payable to investment companies for securities account can fluctuate significantly based on trading activity at the end of a reporting period. On December 31, 2009, the Company changed the trustee of its 401(k) plan. Approximately $100 million of the payable to investment companies for securities balance was due to the transfer of assets between trustees. As a result, on the statement of cash flows, there were corresponding increases and decreases to cash from operations. There is no impact to the Company's liquidity and operations isfor the variations in these accounts.
We pay our financial advisors and third parties upfront commissions on the sale of Class B and C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products. Funding of such commissions during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 totaled $57.9 million, $59.0 million and $54.7 million, respectively. The drivers of commission funding in 2011 were fee-based asset allocation products, for which $26.5 million was funded, and Class C shares, for which $23.0 million was funded. The drivers of commission funding in 2010 were Class C shares, for which $25.9 million was funded, and fee-based asset allocation products, for which $24.8 million was funded. The primary sourcedriver of funds and decreased slightlycommission funding in the current year. Increased revenues combined with higher non-cash amortization2009 was Class C shares, for which $29.8 million of deferredcommissions were funded. Management expects future cash requirements for sales commissions and highermay exceed the level experienced in previous years due to increased sales in our fee-based asset allocation products.
non-cash share-based compensation expense partially offset the impact of considerably lower net earnings in 2008 compared to 2007.
We anticipate that our 2009 contributionContributions to our Pension Plan will bepension plan are not expected to exceed $20 million for 2012. A contribution of $10 million was made from cash generated from operations and will beto the plan in the range from $7.0 to $12.0 million.January 2012.
Investing Cash Flows
Investing activities consist primarily of the purchase and sale of available-for-saleavailable for sale investment securities, as well as capital expenditures. We expect our 20092012 capital expenditures to decline based on completionbe in the range of our home office facilities renovation, initiated in 2007. A portion of the renovation was a contractual obligation under our operating agreement.$15.0 to $20.0 million.
Financing Cash Flows
As noted previously, dividends and stock repurchases accounted for a majority of our financing cash outflows in 2008. An increase in our stock price during 2007 resulted in substantial stock option exercises, and cash provided by stock option exercises was $84.6 million for that year.2011.
On January 13, 2006,Additionally, during 2010 we issued $200.0repurchased $10.0 million in principal amount 5.60% senior notes due 2011 resulting in net proceeds of approximately $198.2 million (net of discounts, commissions and estimated expenses). We used these proceeds, together with cash on hand, to repay the entireour $200.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 7.50%5.6% senior notes due January 18, 2006.2011 (the "Notes"). On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to complete a $190.0 million private placement of Senior Notes (the "Senior Notes"). The notes represent senioragreement contained a delayed funding provision that allowed the Company to draw down the proceeds in January 2011 when the existing Notes matured. The Company used the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Senior Notes to repay in full the Notes expiring in January 2011. The Senior Notes are unsecured obligations and are rated "Baa2" by Moody'swere issued in two tranches: $95.0 million bearing interest at 5% and "BBB" by Standard & Poor's.maturing January 13, 2018 (the "Series A Notes") and $95.0 million bearing interest of 5.75% and maturing January 13, 2021 (the "Series B Notes") (collectively, the "Senior Notes"). Interest iswill be payable semi-annually onin January 15 and July 15 at a rate of 5.60% per annum. The Company, at its option, may call these notes at any time pursuant to a make whole redemption provision, which would compensate holders for any changes in interest rate levels of the notes upon early extinguishment. The Company currently has no intention to call these notes.each year.
TheSimultaneous with the refinancing of our senior notes, the Company entered into a 364-daythree year revolving credit facility (the "Credit"New Credit Facility") with various lenders, effective October 6, 2008,August 31, 2010, which initially provides for initial borrowings of up to $175.0$125.0 million and replaced the Company's previous three-year revolving credit facility. Lenders could, at their option upon the Company's request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. During 2008 and atAt December 31, 20082011, there were no borrowings outstanding under the New Credit Facility. Borrowings underBoth the New Credit Facility bear interest at various rates including adjusted LIBOR or an alternative base rate plus, in each case, an incremental margin based on the Company's credit rating. The Credit Facility also provides for a facility fee on the daily aggregate amount of commitment under the revolving facility (whether or not utilized). The facility fee is also based on the Company's credit rating level. The Credit Facility containsand Senior Notes contain financial covenants with respect to leverage and interest coverage, both of which we were in compliance with throughout fiscal 2008.2011.
Short Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements
Management believes its available cash, marketable securities and expected cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund its short-term operating and capital requirements during 2009.2012. Expected short-term uses of cash include expected dividend payments, interest payments on outstanding debt, income tax payments, seed money for new products, share repurchases, payment of deferred commissions to our financial advisors and third parties, capital expenditures pension funding and home office leasehold improvements, and could include strategic acquisitions.
We pay our financial advisors and third parties upfront commissions on the sale of Class B shares, Class C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products. Funding of such commissions during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $69.5 million, $49.6 million and $19.6 million, respectively. The primary driver of the increase in 2008 was Class C shares, for which $40.3 million of commissions were funded in 2008. The primary drivers of the increase in 2007 were Class C shares and asset allocation products, for which $26.9 million and $14.4 million of commissions were funded in 2007, respectively. Management expects future cash requirements for sales commissions may exceed the level
experienced in previous years due to increased sales in our fee-based asset allocation products and sales growth in the sale of Class B and Class C shares.
Long Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements
Expected long-term capital requirements include indebtedness, operating leases and purchase obligations, and potential recognition of tax liabilities, summarized in the following table as of December 31, 2008.2011. Purchase obligations include amounts that will be due for the purchase of goods and
services to be used in our operations under long-term commitments or contracts. The majority of our purchase obligations are reimbursable to us by the Funds.
| Total | 2009 | 2010- 2011 | 2012- 2013 | Thereafter/ Indeterminate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||
Long-term debt obligations, including interest | $227,969 | 11,200 | 216,769 | - | - | |||||
Non-cancelable operating lease commitments | 72,039 | 17,703 | 27,215 | 15,810 | 11,311 | |||||
Purchase obligations | 124,170 | 39,006 | 55,560 | 26,332 | 3,272 | |||||
Unrecognized tax benefits | 4,903 | 1,094 | - | - | 3,809 | |||||
$429,081 | 69,003 | 299,544 | 42,142 | 18,392 | ||||||
| Total | 2012 | 2013- 2014 | 2015- 2016 | Thereafter/ Indeterminate | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations, including interest | $ | 272,769 | 10,213 | 20,425 | 20,425 | 221,706 | ||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating lease commitments | 93,813 | 20,662 | 30,018 | 15,590 | 27,543 | |||||||||||
Purchase obligations | 143,612 | 41,239 | 68,395 | 33,740 | 238 | |||||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits | 9,759 | - | - | - | 9,759 | |||||||||||
$ | 519,953 | 72,114 | 118,838 | 69,755 | 259,246 | |||||||||||
Other possible long-term discretionary uses of cash could include capital expenditures for enhancement of technology infrastructure and home office expansion, strategic acquisitions, payment of dividends, income tax payments, seed money for new products, payment of upfront fund commissions for Class B shares, Class C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products, pension funding and repurchases of our common stock.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than operating leases, which are included in the table above, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing. The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating its business.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management believes the following critical accounting policies among others, affect its more significant judgmentsestimates and estimatesjudgments used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As of December 31, 2008,2011, our total goodwill and intangible assets were $221.2 million, or 29%20%, of our total assets. Two significant considerations arise with respect to these assets that require management estimates and judgment: (i) the valuation in connection with the initial purchase price allocation, and (ii) the ongoing evaluation of impairment.
In connection with all of our acquisitions, an evaluation is completed to determine reasonable purchase price allocations. The purchase price allocation process requires management estimates and judgments as to expectations for the various products, distribution channels, and business strategies. For example, certain growth rates and operating margins were assumed for different products and distribution channels. If actual growth rates or operating margins, among other assumptions, differ from the estimates and judgments used in the purchase price allocation, the amounts recorded in the financial statements for identifiable intangible assets and goodwill could be subject to charges for impairment in the future.
We complete an ongoing review of the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets using a fair-value based approach on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily acquired mutual fund advisory contracts, are also tested for impairment annually by comparing their fair value to the carrying amount of the asset. We consider mutual
fund advisory contracts indefinite lived intangible assets as they are expected to be renewed without significant cost or modification of terms. Factors that are considered important in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance
compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts, significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being evaluated. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the annual impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge.
Accounting for Income Taxes
In the ordinary course of business, many transactions occur for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. In addition, respective tax authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits examine our significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. We adjust our income tax provision in the period in which we determine that the actual outcomes will likely be different from our estimates. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by Financial Accounting Standards BoardCodification ("FASB"ASC") Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in "Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.Topic," ASC 740. During 20082011, the Company did not settle any open tax years undergoing audits by state jurisdictions in which the Company operates. During 2010 and 2007,2009, the Company settled fivenine open tax years and twothree open tax years, respectively, that were undergoing audit by state jurisdictions in which the Company operates. In 2006 the Company settled five open tax years, 2000 through 2004, that were undergoing audit by the United States Internal Revenue Service. These audits were settled in all material respects with no significant adjustments. The Company is currently undergoing audits in various other state jurisdictions thatwhich have not yet been settled.
We recognize an asset or liability for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, including the determination of any valuation allowance that might be required for deferred tax assets. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of assets are recovered or liabilities are settled. AsIn 2009, the Company sold a subsidiary that generated a capital loss available to offset potential future capital gains. Due to the character of the loss and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, the Company may not realize the full tax benefit of the capital loss. The capital loss carryforward, if not utilized, will expire in 2014. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future capital gains to realize the full benefit of this capital loss. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded on a portion of this capital loss as of December 31, 2008, two2011 and December 31, 2010. Also as of December 31, 2011, three of the Company's subsidiaries have state net operating loss carryforwards in certain states in which those companies file on a separate company basis. These entities have recognized a deferred tax asset for such carryforwards. The carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire between 20092012 and 2028.2031. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the subsidiaries will generate sufficient future taxable income in these states to realize the benefit of these state net operating loss carryforwards and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been establishedrecorded at December 31, 2008, December 31, 20072011 and December 31, 2006.2010. We have not recorded a valuation allowance on any other deferred tax assets as of the current reporting period based on our belief that operating income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefit of these assets over time. In the event that actual results differ from estimates or if our historical trend of positive operating income changes, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which could have a significant effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Finally, income taxes are recorded at the rates in effect in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax law and rate changes are reflected in the income tax provision in the period in which such changes are enacted.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Accounting for our pension and postretirement benefit plans requires us to estimate the cost of benefits to be provided well into the future and the current value of our benefit obligations. Three critical assumptions affecting these estimates are the discount rate, the expected return on assets, and the
expected health care cost trend rate. TheIn 2011, the discount rate assumption iswas based on the Aon Hewitt AA Only Above Median Yield Curve. This discount rate was determined separately for each plan by plotting the expected benefit payments from each plan against a yield curve of high quality, zero coupon bonds and calculating the single rate that would produce the same present value of liabilities as the yield curve. Prior to 2011, the discount rate assumption was based on the Mercer Bond Model, which calculatescalculated the yield on a theoretical portfolio of high-grade corporate bonds with cash flows that generally matchmatched our expected benefit payments. The expected return on plan assets and health care cost trend rates are based upon an evaluation of our historical trends and experience, taking into account
current and expected future market conditions. Other assumptions include rates of future compensation increases, participant withdrawals and mortality rates, and participant retirement ages. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of net pension expense or income recognized each year and the measurement of our reported benefit obligation under the plans.
We continue to utilize aIn 2011, we decreased the discount rate for our pension plan to 4.99% from 6.00% used in 2010 and postretirement plans of 6.75%. In 2007, to reflect market interest rates, we increased6.25% used in 2009, and decreased the discount rate for our planspostretirement plan to 6.75%5.00% from the 6.0%6.00% used in 2006.2010 and 6.25% used in 2009, to reflect market interest rates. We continue to assume long-term asset returns of 7.75% on the assets in our pension plan, the same as our assumption in 20072010 and 2006. Plan2009. Our pension plan assets areat December 31, 2011 were 100% invested in styles including large cap growth, assetthe Asset Strategy style and we have targeted this same investment strategy core plus fixed income and science and technology. Our portfolio mix at year-end was 41% large cap growth, 38% asset strategy, 10% core plus fixed income, 9% science and technology and 2% cash. Our targeted allocation percentages are 40% large cap growth, 35% asset strategy, 13% core plus fixed income, 10% science and technology and 2% cash.going forward.
The effect of hypothetical changes to selected assumptions on the Company's retirement benefit plans would be as follows:
| | December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2012 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assumptions | Change | Increase (Decrease) PBO/APBO (1) | Increase (Decrease) Expense (2) | |||||
| | (in thousands) | ||||||
Pension | ||||||||
Discount rate | +/-50 bps | (8,827)/ | (1,037)/ | |||||
Expected return on assets | +/ | N/A | | (1,098)/ | ||||
Salary scale | +/-100 bps | 7,737/(7,201) | 1,823/(1,651) | |||||
OPEB | ||||||||
Discount rate | +/-50 bps | | (481)/ | | (54)/ | |||
Health care cost trend rate | +/-100 bps | | 1,018/(866) | | 238/(161) |
Deferred Sales Commissions
We pay upfront sales commissions to our financial advisors and third party intermediary broker/dealers in connection with the sale of certain classes of mutual fund shares sold without a front-end sales charge. These costs are capitalized and amortized over the period during which the shareholder is subject to a CDSC, not to exceed five years. We recover these costs through Rule 12b-1 and other distribution plan fees, which are paid by the applicable share classes of the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds and InvestEd portfolios,Portfolios, along with CDSCs paid by shareholders who redeem their shares prior to completion of the
required holding periods. Should we lose our ability to recover such sales commissions through distribution plan payments and CDSCs, the value of these assets would immediately decline, as would future cash flows. We periodically review the recoverability of deferred sales commission assets as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of deferred sales commission assets may not be recoverable and adjust the deferred assets accordingly.
Valuation of Investments
We record substantially all investments in our financial statements at fair value. Where available, we use prices from independent sources such as listed market prices or broker/dealer price quotations. We evaluate our investments for other than temporary declines in value on a periodic basis. This may exist
when the fair value of an investment security has been below the current value for an extended period of time. As most of our investments are carried at fair value, if an other than temporary decline in value is determined to exist, the unrealized investment loss recorded net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income is realized as a charge to net income, in the period in which the other than temporary decline in value is determined. While we believe that we have accurately estimated the amount of the other than temporary decline in the value of our portfolio, different assumptions could result in changes to the recorded amounts in our financial statements.
Loss Contingencies
The likelihood that a loss contingency exists is evaluated using the criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 5,"Accounting for Contingencies"Contingencies Topic," ASC 450 through consultation with legal counsel. A loss contingency is recorded if the contingency is considered probable and reasonably estimable as of the date of the financial statements.
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarified that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. Awards of this nature are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not expect material changes to our basic earnings per share calculations in 2009. All prior-period earnings per share data presented must be adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of this standard. There will be no change to our quarterly and annual basic earnings per share information for prior periods due to the adoption of this standard; however, the impact on quarterly and annual basic earnings per share is expected to be immaterial through 2008.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,"The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS No. 162"). SFAS No. 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for nongovernmental entities. It is not expected that the provisions of SFAS No. 162 will have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 142-3,"Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" ("FSP SFAS 142-3"). FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. It is not expected that the adoption of this standard on January 1, 2009 will significantly affect our results of operations or financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,"Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an Amendment of ARB No. 51" ("SFAS No. 160"). This standard amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 160 are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and the standard is to be applied prospectively. The Company does not have a non-controlling interest in any of its consolidated reporting entities and therefore this standard does not currently apply.
In December 2007, the FASB amended SFAS No. 141,"Business Combinations," which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. These
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Adoption of this standard on January 1, 2009 will affect our results of operations and financial condition only if the Company acquires the assets of another entity subsequent to adoption date.
Seasonality and Inflation
We do not believe our operations are subject to significant seasonal fluctuation. We have historically experienced increased sales activity in the first and fourth quarters of the year due to funding of retirement accounts by our clients; however, the fourth quarter of 2008 did not reflect increased sales activity.clients. The Company has not suffered material adverse affectseffects from inflation in the past. However, a substantial increase in the inflation rate in the future may adversely affect customers' purchasing decisions, may increase the costs of borrowing, or may have an impact on the Company's margins and overall cost structure.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We use various financial instruments with certain inherent market risks, primarily related to interest rates and securities prices. The principal risks of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices to which we are exposed relate to interest rates on debt and marketable securities. Generally, these instruments have not been entered into for trading purposes. Management actively monitors these risk exposures; however, fluctuations could impact our results of operations and financial position. As a matter of policy, we only execute derivative transactions to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business and not for speculative or trading purposes. The following information, together with information included in other parts of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe the key aspects of certain financial instruments that have market risk to us.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Our interest sensitive liabilities include our long-term fixed rate senior notes and obligations for any balances outstanding under our credit facility or other short-term borrowings. Increases in market interest rates would generally cause a decrease in the fair value of the senior notes and an increase in interest expense associated with short-term borrowings and borrowings under the credit facility. Decreases in market interest rates would generally cause an increase in the fair value of the senior notes and a decrease in interest expense associated with short-term borrowings and borrowings under the credit facility. We had no short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2008. On January 13, 2006, we issued $200.0 million in principal amount of 5.60% fixed rate senior notes due 2011. Proceeds from the new senior notes were used to pay down our $200.0 million in 7.50% senior notes which matured on January 18, 2006.
During 2005, the Company entered into two forward starting interest rate swap agreements that had five year fixed swap rates of 4.57% and 4.84%, respectively, on notional amounts of $100.0 million for each swap. The swaps were put in place to hedge against changes in forecasted interest payments attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate between the time we entered into the swap agreement and the time we anticipated refinancing the notes in January 2006. We assessed the effectiveness of the swaps as hedges at their inception and at December 31, 2005, and we considered these swaps to be completely effective cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133,"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." As of December 31, 2008, net unrealized gains attributed to the forward swap cash flow hedges were approximately $0.5 million and were included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
On January 10, 2006, the Company terminated these forward interest rate swap agreements upon the completion of its new offering in January 2006 of $200.0 million in principal amount 5.60% senior notes due January 2011. In connection with the termination of the swap agreements, the Company received a net cash settlement of $1.1 million. The Company's gain on this transaction has been deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and is being amortized into earnings as a decrease to interest expense over the five year term of the new notes.
Available for Sale Investments Sensitivity
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. Our portfolio is diversified and consists primarily of investment grade debt securities and equity mutual funds. A substantial portion of investments are classified as available-for-saleavailable for sale investments. At any time, a sharp increase in interest rates or a sharp decline in the United States stock market could have a significant negative impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary by management, the cost basis of the individual security or mutual fund is written down to fair value. We do not currently hedge these exposures. Conversely, declines in interest rates or a sizeable rise in the United States stock market could have a significant positive impact on our investment portfolio. However, unrealized gains are not recognized in operations on available-for-saleavailable for sale securities until they are sold. We do not currently hedge these exposures.
Securities Price Sensitivity
Our revenues are dependent on the underlying assets under management in the Funds to which investment advisory services are provided. The Funds include portfolios of investments comprised of various combinations of equity, fixed income and other types of securities.securities and commodities. Fluctuations in the value of these securities are common and are generated by numerous factors, including, without limitation, market volatility, the overall economy, inflation, changes in investor strategies, availability of alternative investment vehicles, government regulations and others. Accordingly, declines in any one or a combination of these factors, or other factors not separately identified, may reduce the value of investment securities and, in turn, the underlying assets under management on which our revenues are earned. These declines have an impact in our investment sales and our trading portfolio, thereby compounding the impact on our earnings.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Index on page 5148 setting forth our consolidated financial statements, together with the report of KPMG LLP dated February 26, 200928, 2012 on page 52.49.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in"Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on our evaluation under the framework in"Internal Control-Integrated Framework," management concluded that, as of December 31, 2008,2011, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2011, as stated in their attestation report which follows.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.:
We have audited Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008,2011, and our report dated February 26, 200928, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 26, 200928, 2012
None.
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information required by this Item 10. is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by this Item 11. is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information required by this Item 12. is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by this Item 13. is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information required by this Item 14. is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 20092012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) | Financial Statements. | |||
Reference is made to the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page | ||||
(a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedules. | |||
None. | ||||
(b) | Exhibits. | |||
Reference is made to the Index to Exhibits beginning on page 84 for a list of all exhibits filed as part of this Report. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Overland Park, State of Kansas, on February 27, 2009.29, 2012.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC. | ||||
By: | /s/ HENRY J. HERRMANN Henry J. Herrmann Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name | Title | Date | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ HENRY J. HERRMANN Henry J. Herrmann | Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director | February | ||
Daniel P. Connealy |
|
| ||
Brent K. Bloss |
|
| ||
Sharilyn S. Gasaway |
|
| ||
Thomas C. Godlasky |
|
| ||
Alan W. Kosloff |
|
| ||
Dennis E. Logue |
|
| ||
Michael F. Morrissey |
|
| ||
James M. Raines |
|
| ||
Ronald C. Reimer |
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
/s/ JERRY W. WALTON Jerry W. Walton |
|
|
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
| Page | |
---|---|---|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | ||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, | ||
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, | ||
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011 | 52 | |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, | ||
| ||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, | ||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008.2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20082011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20082011, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 26, 200928, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 26, 200928, 2012
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 20082011 and 20072010
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 210,328 | 263,914 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents – restricted | 48,713 | 99,886 | ||||||
Investment securities | 58,684 | 50,913 | ||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||
Funds and separate accounts | 33,539 | 43,602 | ||||||
Customers and other | 61,280 | 80,909 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 11,182 | 2,559 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 7,109 | 6,165 | ||||||
Total current assets | 430,835 | 547,948 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 59,966 | 47,984 | ||||||
Deferred sales commissions, net | 52,183 | 45,290 | ||||||
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets | 221,210 | 228,432 | ||||||
Pension benefits | – | 14,929 | ||||||
Other non-current assets | 11,166 | 9,167 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 775,360 | 893,750 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 40,002 | 22,233 | |||||
Payable to investment companies for securities | 67,848 | 159,151 | ||||||
Accrued compensation | 24,296 | 38,310 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 2,397 | 271 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 70,165 | 52,637 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 204,708 | 272,602 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 199,969 | 199,955 | ||||||
Accrued pension and postretirement costs | 29,083 | 7,230 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 3,564 | 15,682 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities | 17,911 | 16,663 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 455,235 | 512,132 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 18) | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock—$1.00 par value: 5,000 shares authorized; none issued | – | – | ||||||
Class A Common stock—$0.01 par value: 250,000 shares authorized; | 997 | 997 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 207,886 | 209,210 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 487,558 | 456,499 | ||||||
Cost of 14,824 common shares in treasury (13,071 in 2007) | (350,463) | (291,719) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (25,853) | 6,631 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 320,125 | 381,618 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 775,360 | 893,750 | |||||
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
Assets: | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 327,083 | 195,315 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents—restricted | 50,569 | 81,197 | ||||
Investment securities | 135,497 | 192,611 | ||||
Receivables: | ||||||
Funds and separate accounts | 31,842 | 27,234 | ||||
Customers and other | 116,996 | 84,736 | ||||
Deferred income taxes | 11,848 | 10,622 | ||||
Income taxes receivable | 15,067 | 4,336 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 10,709 | 8,999 | ||||
Total current assets | 699,611 | 605,050 | ||||
Property and equipment, net | 74,028 | 71,248 | ||||
Deferred sales commissions, net | 68,788 | 64,710 | ||||
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets | 221,210 | 221,210 | ||||
Deferred income taxes | 4,878 | - | ||||
Other non-current assets | 13,681 | 14,713 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 1,082,196 | 976,931 | |||
Liabilities: | ||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 52,134 | 40,844 | |||
Payable to investment companies for securities | 104,304 | 117,596 | ||||
Accrued compensation | 35,117 | 37,696 | ||||
Payable to third party brokers | 41,125 | 38,909 | ||||
Other current liabilities | 56,218 | 46,897 | ||||
Total current liabilities | 288,898 | 281,942 | ||||
Long-term debt | 190,000 | 189,999 | ||||
Accrued pension and postretirement costs | 56,548 | 22,492 | ||||
Deferred income taxes | - | 4,729 | ||||
Other non-current liabilities | 23,107 | 20,608 | ||||
Total liabilities | 558,553 | 519,770 | ||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||
Preferred stock—$1.00 par value: 5,000 shares authorized; none issued | - | - | ||||
Class A Common stock—$0.01 par value: 250,000 shares authorized; 99,701 shares issued; 85,564 shares outstanding (85,751 at December 31, 2010) | 997 | 997 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 216,426 | 201,442 | ||||
Retained earnings | 721,281 | 618,813 | ||||
Cost of 14,137 common shares in treasury (13,950 at December 31, 2010) | (366,954) | (346,064) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (48,107) | (18,027) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 523,643 | 457,161 | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 1,082,196 | 976,931 | |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
| | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 399,863 | 372,345 | 311,525 | |||||||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 416,762 | 371,085 | 317,458 | ||||||||||
Shareholder service fees | 102,495 | 94,124 | 89,672 | ||||||||||
Total | 919,120 | 837,554 | 718,655 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||
Underwriting and distribution | 496,822 | 422,274 | 356,538 | ||||||||||
Compensation and related costs (including share-based | 119,057 | 115,905 | 110,101 | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 76,370 | 48,487 | 100,604 | ||||||||||
Subadvisory fees | 41,122 | 43,844 | 30,758 | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 13,198 | 12,412 | 11,725 | ||||||||||
Goodwill impairment | 7,222 | — | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Total | 753,791 | 642,922 | 629,726 | ||||||||||
Operating income | 165,329 | 194,632 | 88,929 | ||||||||||
Investment and other income | 3,178 | 16,452 | 12,498 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (12,087) | (11,924) | (12,227) | ||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 156,420 | 199,160 | 89,200 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 60,257 | 73,663 | 43,088 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 96,163 | 125,497 | 46,112 | |||||||||
Net income per share: | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.17 | 1.55 | 0.57 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.15 | 1.52 | 0.55 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | — basic | 82,331 | 80,781 | 81,353 | |||||||||
— diluted | 83,969 | 82,824 | 83,212 | ||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.60 |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||
Investment management fees | $ | 530,599 | 457,538 | 354,593 | |||||
Underwriting and distribution fees | 532,693 | 468,057 | 378,678 | ||||||
Shareholder service fees | 131,885 | 119,290 | 105,818 | ||||||
Total | 1,195,177 | 1,044,885 | 839,089 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||
Underwriting and distribution | 616,031 | 543,604 | 449,925 | ||||||
Compensation and related costs (including share-based compensation of $46,473, $40,338 and $30,573, respectively) | 161,401 | 142,255 | 124,463 | ||||||
General and administrative | 80,533 | 66,703 | 58,034 | ||||||
Subadvisory fees | 29,885 | 27,823 | 23,202 | ||||||
Depreciation | 15,235 | 14,030 | 13,653 | ||||||
Total | 903,085 | 794,415 | 669,277 | ||||||
Operating income | 292,092 | 250,470 | 169,812 | ||||||
Investment and other income | 2,049 | 8,737 | 5,039 | ||||||
Interest expense | (11,413) | (12,723) | (12,695) | ||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 282,728 | 246,484 | 162,156 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 107,269 | 89,525 | 56,651 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 175,459 | 156,959 | 105,505 | |||||
Net income per share: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.05 | $ | 1.83 | 1.23 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 2.05 | $ | 1.83 | 1.23 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||||
Basic | 85,783 | 85,618 | 85,484 | ||||||
Diluted | 85,793 | 85,647 | 85,544 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYYears ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006(in thousands)
| Common Stock | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 99,701 | $ | 997 | 195,315 | 393,043 | (343,100) | 1,119 | 247,374 | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 46,112 | — | — | 46,112 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation | — | — | 21,854 | 8 | — | — | 21,862 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of nonvested shares and other | — | — | (26,934) | — | 26,934 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Dividends accrued, $.60 per share | — | — | — | (50,741) | — | — | (50,741) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | — | — | (5,295) | — | 21,483 | — | 16,188 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | — | 4,359 | — | — | — | 4,359 | ||||||||||||||
Other stock transactions | — | — | — | — | (5,640) | — | (5,640) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | — | — | — | — | (27,643) | — | (27,643) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale investment securities | — | — | — | — | — | 1,569 | 1,569 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification for amounts included in net income | — | — | — | — | — | (2,199) | (2,199) | ||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives | — | — | — | — | — | (283) | (283) | ||||||||||||||
Reversal of minimum pension liability | — | — | — | — | — | 5,146 | 5,146 | ||||||||||||||
Additional pension and postretirement plan liability | — | — | — | — | — | (11,404) | (11,404) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 99,701 | 997 | 189,299 | 388,422 | (327,966) | (6,052) | 244,700 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 125,497 | — | — | 125,497 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation | — | — | 23,704 | — | — | 23,704 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of nonvested shares and other | — | — | (24,517) | — | 24,517 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Dividends accrued, $.68 per share | — | — | — | (57,420) | — | — | (57,420) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | — | — | 7,805 | — | 76,757 | — | 84,562 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | — | 12,919 | — | — | — | 12,919 | ||||||||||||||
Other stock transactions | — | — | — | — | (5,539) | — | (5,539) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | — | — | — | — | (59,488) | — | (59,488) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale investment securities | — | — | — | — | — | 2,345 | 2,345 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification for amounts included in net income | — | — | — | — | — | (2,428) | (2,428) | ||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits | — | — | — | — | — | 12,766 | 12,766 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 99,701 | 997 | 209,210 | 456,499 | (291,719) | 6,631 | 381,618 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 96,163 | — | — | 96,163 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation | — | — | 28,933 | 34 | — | — | 28,967 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation related to restructuring | — | — | 795 | — | — | — | 795 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of nonvested shares and other | — | — | (34,990) | — | 34,990 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Dividends accrued, $.76 per share | — | — | — | (65,138) | — | — | (65,138) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | — | — | (3,533) | — | 11,581 | — | 8,048 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | — | 7,471 | — | — | — | 7,471 | ||||||||||||||
Other stock transactions | — | — | — | — | (12,303) | — | (12,303) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | — | — | — | — | (93,012) | — | (93,012) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on available for sale investment securities | — | — | — | — | — | (8,435) | (8,435) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification for amounts included in net income | — | — | — | — | — | (142) | (142) | ||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits | — | — | — | — | — | (23,907) | (23,907) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | 99,701 | $ | 997 | 207,886 | 487,558 | (350,463) | (25,853) | 320,125 | |||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 96,163 | 125,497 | 46,112 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investment securities during the period, net of income taxes of $(4,855), $1,354 and $719, respectively | (8,435) | 2,345 | 1,569 | |||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives during the period, net of income taxes of $0, $0 and $(188), respectively | — | — | (283) | |||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits, net of income taxes of $(13,764), $7,178 and $3,022, respectively | (23,907) | 12,766 | 5,146 | |||||||
Reclassification adjustments for amounts included in net income, net of income taxes of $(84), $(1,396) and $(1,226), respectively | (142) | (2,428) | (2,199) | |||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 63,679 | 138,180 | 50,345 | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 175,459 | 156,959 | 105,505 | |||||
Other comprehensive income: | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investment securities during the year, net of income taxes of $(2,120), $2,028 and $2,950, respectively | (3,635) | 3,493 | 4,974 | ||||||
Valuation allowance on investment securities' deferred tax asset during the year | (2,955) | 963 | - | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits, net of income taxes of $(13,232), $628 and $(821), respectively | (22,062) | 1,061 | (949) | ||||||
Reclassification adjustments for amounts included in net income, net of income taxes of $(830), $(1,139) and $159, respectively | (1,428) | (1,980) | 264 | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 145,379 | 160,496 | 109,794 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands)
| Common Stock | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | 99,701 | $ | 997 | 207,886 | 487,558 | (350,463) | (25,853) | 320,125 | |||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 105,505 | - | - | 105,505 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation | - | - | 30,565 | 8 | - | - | 30,573 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation related to divestiture of ACF | - | - | 400 | - | - | 400 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of nonvested shares and other | - | - | (46,345) | - | 46,345 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Dividends accrued, $.76 per share | - | - | - | (65,195) | - | - | (65,195) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | - | - | (5,393) | - | 19,529 | - | 14,136 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | - | - | 2,787 | - | - | - | 2,787 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | - | - | - | - | (43,565) | - | (43,565) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on available for sale investment securities | - | - | - | - | - | 4,974 | 4,974 | ||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits | - | - | - | - | - | (949) | (949) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification for amounts included in net income | - | - | - | - | - | 264 | 264 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 99,701 | 997 | 189,900 | 527,876 | (328,154) | (21,564) | 369,055 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 156,959 | - | - | 156,959 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation | - | - | 40,319 | 19 | - | - | 40,338 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of nonvested shares and other | - | - | (37,631) | - | 37,631 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Dividends accrued, $.77 per share | - | - | - | (66,041) | - | - | (66,041) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | - | - | 2,726 | - | 10,331 | - | 13,057 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | - | - | 6,128 | - | - | - | 6,128 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | - | - | - | - | (65,872) | - | (65,872) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on available for sale investment securities | - | - | - | - | - | 3,493 | 3,493 | ||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance on investment securities' deferred tax asset | - | - | - | - | - | 963 | 963 | ||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits | - | - | - | - | - | 1,061 | 1,061 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification for amounts included in net income | - | - | - | - | - | (1,980) | (1,980) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 99,701 | 997 | 201,442 | 618,813 | (346,064) | (18,027) | 457,161 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 175,459 | - | - | 175,459 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of equity compensation | - | - | 46,457 | 16 | - | - | 46,473 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of nonvested shares | - | - | (40,442) | - | 40,442 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Dividends accrued, $.85 per share | - | - | - | (73,007) | - | - | (73,007) | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | - | - | 949 | - | 4,131 | - | 5,080 | ||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | - | - | 8,020 | - | - | - | 8,020 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | - | - | - | - | (65,463) | - | (65,463) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on available for sale investment securities | - | - | - | - | - | (3,635) | (3,635) | ||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance on investment securities' deferred tax asset | - | - | - | - | - | (2,955) | (2,955) | ||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits | - | - | - | - | - | (22,062) | (22,062) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification for amounts included in net income | - | - | - | - | - | (1,428) | (1,428) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 99,701 | $ | 997 | 216,426 | 721,281 | (366,954) | (48,107) | 523,643 | |||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 96,163 | 125,497 | 46,112 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 12,969 | 12,395 | 11,937 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred sales commissions | 62,560 | 24,766 | 15,058 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation | 29,762 | 23,704 | 21,862 | ||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | (7,471) | (12,919) | (4,359) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of available-for-sale investment securities | — | (3,598) | (3,260) | ||||||||
Net purchases and sales of trading securities | (26,885) | (926) | (749) | ||||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on trading securities | 6,072 | (1,001) | (283) | ||||||||
Goodwill impairment | 7,222 | — | 20,000 | ||||||||
Loss on sale and retirement of property and equipment | 899 | 405 | 592 | ||||||||
Capital gains and dividends reinvested | (1,880) | (2,135) | (1,317) | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (2,040) | (3,171) | (1,423) | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents — restricted | 51,173 | (67,257) | (6,548) | ||||||||
Receivables from funds and separate accounts | 10,063 | (4,796) | (5,401) | ||||||||
Other receivables | 19,629 | (21,046) | (16,632) | ||||||||
Other assets | (2,943) | 1,375 | (178) | ||||||||
Deferred sales commissions | (69,453) | (49,594) | (19,621) | ||||||||
Accounts payable and payable to investment companies | (73,534) | 89,523 | 31,091 | ||||||||
Other liabilities | 12,071 | 16,889 | 6,130 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 124,377 | 128,111 | 93,011 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities | (100) | (5,650) | (7,350) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investment securities | — | 10,429 | 14,812 | ||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investment securities | 1,750 | — | 435 | ||||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (26,079) | (9,925) | (10,229) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (24,429) | (5,146) | (2,332) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
Proceeds from long term debt and interest rate swap termination | — | — | 199,863 | ||||||||
Repayment of long term debt | — | — | (200,000) | ||||||||
Dividends paid | (63,738) | (55,392) | (50,613) | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (93,012) | (59,488) | (27,643) | ||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 8,048 | 84,562 | 16,188 | ||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | 7,471 | 12,919 | 4,359 | ||||||||
Other stock transactions | (12,303) | (5,539) | (5,640) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (153,534) | (22,938) | (63,486) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (53,586) | 100,027 | 27,193 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 263,914 | 163,887 | 136,694 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 210,328 | 263,914 | 163,887 | |||||||
Cash paid for: | |||||||||||
Income taxes (net) | $ | 53,146 | 74,439 | 29,922 | |||||||
Interest | $ | 11,200 | 11,200 | 6,845 |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 175,459 | 156,959 | 105,505 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 16,332 | 13,834 | 13,476 | ||||||
Other than temporary impairment of investments in affiliated mutual funds | - | - | 3,686 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred sales commissions | 53,855 | 58,381 | 42,771 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 46,473 | 40,338 | 30,973 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | (8,020) | (6,128) | (2,787) | ||||||
Gain on sale of available for sale investment securities | (2,258) | (2,893) | (2,623) | ||||||
Net purchases and sales or maturities of trading securities | 59,034 | (60,623) | 7,864 | ||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on trading securities | 1,231 | (5,101) | (4,779) | ||||||
Loss on sale and retirement of property and equipment | 2,059 | 201 | 1,009 | ||||||
Capital gains and dividends reinvested | - | (365) | (1,141) | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 2,395 | (5,200) | 4,093 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - restricted | 30,628 | (8,256) | (24,228) | ||||||
Receivables from funds and separate accounts | (4,608) | 7,714 | (1,409) | ||||||
Other receivables | (32,260) | 94,678 | (117,820) | ||||||
Other assets | (512) | (4,245) | (1,480) | ||||||
Deferred sales commissions | (57,933) | (58,968) | (54,711) | ||||||
Accounts payable and payable to investment companies | (2,002) | (88,946) | 139,528 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 3,266 | 9,263 | 17,252 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 283,139 | 140,643 | 155,179 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||
Purchases of available for sale investment securities | (102,451) | (76,961) | (21,364) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available for sale investment securities | 92,282 | 26,463 | 15,052 | ||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (20,078) | (17,313) | (30,861) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment | 5 | 5 | 7,685 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (30,242) | (67,806) | (29,488) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||
Debt repayment | - | (10,000) | - | ||||||
Dividends paid | (68,766) | (65,194) | (65,018) | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (65,463) | (65,872) | (43,565) | ||||||
Exercise of stock options | 5,080 | 13,057 | 14,136 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | 8,020 | 6,128 | 2,787 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (121,129) | (121,881) | (91,660) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 131,768 | (49,044) | 34,031 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 195,315 | 244,359 | 210,328 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 327,083 | 195,315 | 244,359 | |||||
Cash paid for: | |||||||||
Income taxes (net) | $ | 105,080 | 92,038 | 50,369 | |||||
Interest | $ | 10,426 | 10,920 | 12,266 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
1. Description of Business
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to as the "Company," "we," "our" and "us") derive revenues primarily from investment management, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration provided to the Waddell & Reed Advisors Group of Mutual Funds (the "Advisors Funds"), Ivy Funds (the "Ivy Funds"), Ivy Funds Variable Insurance Porfolios, Inc.Portfolios (the "Ivy Funds VIP") (renamed from W&R Target Funds, Inc. in 2008), Ivy Funds, Inc. and the Ivy Funds portfolios (collectively, the "Ivy Funds"), and Waddell & Reed InvestEd Portfolios Inc. ("InvestEd") (collectively, the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds, VIP, Ivy Funds VIP and InvestEd are referred to as the "Funds"), and institutional and separately managed accounts. The Funds and the institutional and separately managed accounts operate under various rules and regulations set forth by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Services to the Funds are provided under investment management agreements, underwriting agreements and shareholder servicing and accounting service agreements that set forth the fees to be charged for these services. The majority of these agreements are subject to annual review and approval by each Fund's board of directors/trustees and shareholders. Our revenues are largely dependent on the total value and composition of assets under management, which include mainly domestic equity securities, but also include debt securities and international equities.management. Accordingly, fluctuations in financial markets and composition of assets under management can significantly impact revenues and results of operations.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Amounts in the accompanying financial statements and notes are rounded to the nearest thousand unless otherwise stated. Certain amounts in the prior years' financial statements have been reclassified for consistent presentation.
Use of Estimates
GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, and related disclosures of commitments and contingencies. Estimates are used for, but are not limited to, depreciation and amortization, income taxes, valuation of assets, pension and postretirement obligations, and contingencies. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which has increased the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions.environment. Actual results could differ from our estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and short-term investments. We consider all highly liquid investments with original or remaining maturities upon acquisition of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2008, our cash and cash equivalents balance is comprised of commercial paper of $56.5 million and cash and money market assets of $153.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents — restricted represents cash held for the benefit of customers segregated in compliance with federal and other regulations. Substantially all cash balances are in excess of federal deposit insurance limits.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, receivables, payables and long-term debt approximates carrying value. Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. Otherwise, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
The Company adopted StatementTable of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157,"Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157") effective January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The Company did not have a transition adjustment to beginning retained earnings as a result of adopting this standard. SFAS No. 157 applies to all financial instruments that are measured and reported on a fair value basis. This includes those items reported in investment securities on the consolidated balance sheets.Contents
In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 157, the Company also adopted SFAS 159,
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
"The Fair Value Option for Financial AssetsNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115" ("SFAS No. 159") as of January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 provides companies the option to report select financial assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Additionally, the transition provisions of SFAS No. 159 permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in beginning retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of a financial asset or financial liability and it may not be revoked. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not result in a transition adjustment to beginning retained earnings.2009
Investment Securities and Investments in Affiliated Mutual Funds
Our investments are comprised of United States, state and government obligations, corporate debt securities and investments in affiliated mutual funds. Investments are classified as available-for-saleavailable for sale or trading. Unrealized holding gains and losses on securities available-for-sale,available for sale, net of related tax effects, are excluded from earnings until realized and are reported as a separate component of comprehensive income. For trading securities, unrealized holding gains and losses are included in earnings. Realized gains and losses are computed using the specific identification method for investment securities, other than mutual funds. For mutual funds, realized gains and losses are computed using the average cost method.
Our available-for-saleavailable for sale investments are reviewed each quarter and adjusted for other than temporary declines in value. We consider factors affecting the issuer and the industry the issuer operates in, general market trends including interest rates, and our ability and intent to hold an investment until it has recovered. Consideration is given to the length of time an investment's market value has been below carrying value and prospects for recovery to carrying value. When a decline in the fair value of equity securities is determined to be other than temporary, the unrealized loss recorded net of tax in other comprehensive income is realized as a charge to net income and a new cost basis is established for financial reporting purposes. When a decline in the fair value of debt securities is determined to be other than temporary, the amount of the impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. If so, the other than temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the investment's amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If not, the portion of the impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings while the portion of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost. The costs of improvements that extend the life of a fixed asset are capitalized, while the costs of repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are calculated and recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset (or lease term if shorter), generally fivethree to ten10 years for furniture, fixtures data
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
processing equipment and computer software; five to 2010 years for equipment and machinery;data processing equipment; 10 to 30 years for buildings; three to 26 years for equipment; and up to 15 years for leasehold improvements.improvements, which is the lesser of the lease term or expected life.
Software Developed for Internal Use
Certain internal costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software for internal use are capitalized in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position No. 98-1,"Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.Intangibles — Goodwill and Other Topic," ASC 350. Internal costs capitalized are included in Propertyproperty and equipment, net onin the consolidated balance sheets, and were $14.4$12.4 million and $9.3$14.0 million as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively. Amortization begins when the software project is complete and ready for its intended use and continues over the estimated useful life, generally five to ten10 years.
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of the Company's investment in the net assets of acquired companies over the fair value of the underlying identifiable net assets at the dates of acquisition. Goodwill
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
is not amortized, but is reviewed annually for impairment in the second quarter of each year and when events or circumstances occur whichthat indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the Company's reporting unit level. To determine fair value, our review process uses the income and market approaches. In performing the analysis, we use the best information available under the circumstances, including reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
Identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Indefinite life intangible assets represent advisory and subadvisory management contracts for managed assets obtained in acquisitions. We consider these contracts to be indefinite lived intangible assets as they are expected to be renewed without significant cost or modification of terms. We complete an ongoing review of the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce their fair value.
Factors that are consideredthe Company considers important in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts, significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being evaluated. Because
The Company has two reporting units for goodwill: (i) investment management and related services and (ii) our Legend group of subsidiaries ("Legend"). The investment management and related services reporting unit's goodwill was recorded as part of the significancespin-off of the Company from its former parent, and to a lesser extent, was recorded as part of subsequent business combinations that were merged into the existing investment management operations. Legend, our second reporting unit for goodwill, is currently a stand-alone investment management subsidiary and goodwill associated with this acquisition can be assessed apart from other investment management operations.
To determine fair values of the reporting units, our review process uses the market and income approaches. In performing the analyses, the Company uses the best information available under the circumstances, including reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections.
The market approach employs market multiples for comparable companies in the financial services industry. Estimates of fair values of the reporting units are established using multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"). The Company believes that fair values calculated based on multiples of EBITDA are an accurate estimation of fair value.
If the fair value coverage margin calculated under the market approach is not considered significant, the Company utilizes a second approach, the income approach, to estimate fair values and averages the results under both methodologies. The income approach employs a discounted free cash flow approach that takes into account current actual results, projected future results, and the Company's estimated weighted average cost of capital.
The Company compares the fair values of the reporting units to their carrying amounts, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
Indefinite-life intangible assets represent advisory and subadvisory management contracts for managed assets obtained in acquisitions. The Company considers these contracts to our consolidated balance sheet, any changes in key assumptions about our businessbe indefinite-life intangible assets as they are expected to be renewed without significant cost or prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in anmodification of terms. The Company also tests these assets for impairment charge and such a charge could have a material effect on our financial condition and resultsannually by comparing their fair values to the carrying amount of operations.the assets.
Deferred Sales Commissions
We defer certain costs, principally sales commissions and related compensation, which are paid to financial advisors and broker/dealers in connection with the sale of certain mutual fund shares sold without a front-end load sales charge. The costs incurred at the time of the sale of Class B shares are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years, which approximates the expected life of the shareholders' investments. The costs incurred at the time of the sale of Class C shares are amortized on a straight-line basis over 12 months. In addition, the costs incurred at the time of the sale of shares for certain asset allocation
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
products are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis, not to exceed three years. We recover these deferred costs through Rule 12b-1 and other distribution fees, which are paid on the Class B and Class C shares of the Advisors Funds and Ivy Funds, along with contingent deferred
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
sales charges ("CDSCs") paid by shareholders who redeem their shares prior to completion of the required holding period (three years for shares of certain asset allocation products, six years for a Class B share and 12 months for a Class C share)., as well as through client fees paid on the asset allocation products. Should we lose our ability to recover such sales commissions through distribution fees or CDSCs, the value of these assets would immediately decline, as would future cash flows. In addition, the costs incurred at the time of the sale of shares for certain asset allocation products are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis, not to exceed three years. We periodically review the recoverability of the deferred sales commission assets as events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable and adjust them accordingly. As part of our review in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded $6.5 million in additional amortization ($0.7 million related to Class B shares and $5.8 million related to Class C shares).
Revenue Recognition
We recognize investment management fees as earned over the period in which services are rendered. We charge the Funds daily based upon average daily net assets under management in accordance with investment management agreements between the Funds and the Company. In general, the majority of investment management fees earned from institutional and separate accounts are charged either monthly or quarterly based upon an average of net assets under management in accordance with such investment management agreements.
Shareholder service fees are recognized monthly and are calculated based on the number of accounts or assets under management as applicable. Other administrative service fee revenues are recognized when contractual obligations are fulfilled or as services are provided.
Underwriting and distribution commission revenues resulting from the sale of investment products are recognized on the trade date.
Fee-based asset allocation revenues are charged quarterly based upon average daily net assets under management.
We also recognize distribution revenues monthly for certain types of investment products, primarily variable annuity products that are generally calculated based upon average daily net assets under management.
Advertising and Promotion
We expense all advertising and promotion costs as incurred. Advertising expense was $5.3$10.2 million, $4.8$5.6 million and $2.9$4.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively, and is classified in both underwriting and distribution expense and general and administrative expense in the statementconsolidated statements of income.
Share-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R,"Share-Based Payment, (revised 2004)" ("SFAS No. 123R"). The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R We account for share-based compensation expense using the modified prospective transitionfair value method. Under the fair value method, of adoption, which did not require restatement of prior periods. Under that transition method,share-based compensation expense recognized in 2006, 2007 and 2008 for all share-based awards granted after December 31, 2005 is based onreflects the grant date fair value of share-based awards measured at grant date, is recognized over the awards, net of estimatedservice period, and is adjusted each period for anticipated forfeitures.
Under SFAS No. 123R, the Company is required to estimate forfeitures at the grant date. The Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $503 thousand ($321 thousand increasealso issues share-based awards to net income after tax) upon adoption, in order to adjust for expected forfeitures on all nonvested stock awards outstanding on January 1, 2006. This cumulative effect of change in accounting principle is classified in compensation and related costsour financial advisors (our sales force) who are independent contractors. Changes in the consolidated statementCompany's share price result in variable compensation expense over the vesting period. The fair value of income for the year ended December 31, 2006.options granted are calculated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
model. The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions as to dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, expected volatility and expected life of the option.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Income tax expense is based on pre-tax financial accounting income, including adjustments made for the recognition or derecognition ofrelated to uncertain tax positions. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in "Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109"Topic, " ("FIN 48").ASC 740. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. A valuation allowance is recognized for deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments are recorded onin the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The Company periodically uses interest rate swaps to manage risks associated with interest rate volatility. All derivative instruments have been designated as hedges, in accordance with GAAP. If the underlying hedged transaction ceases to exist, all changes in fair value of the related derivatives that have not been settled are recognized in current earnings or amortized over the term of the hedged transaction. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are marked to market with changes recognized in current earnings. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes and is not a party to leveraged derivatives.
3. Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs" ("ASU 2011-04"). This ASU was issued concurrently with International Financial Reporting Standard ("IFRS") 13, "Fair Value Measurements" ("IFRS 13"), to provide largely identical guidance about fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The new standards do not extend the use of fair value but, rather, provide guidance about how fair value should be applied where it already is required or permitted under IFRS or U.S. GAAP. For U.S. GAAP, most of the changes are clarifications of existing guidance or wording changes to align with IFRS 13. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is required to be applied prospectively. In the period of adoption, a reporting entity will be required to disclose a change, if any, in valuation technique and related inputs that result from applying the ASU and to quantify the total effect, if practicable. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 in 2012 will not impact the Company's consolidated financial results but may result in changes to fair value footnote disclosures.
In June 2008,2011, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1,ASU 2011-05, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarified that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. AwardsComprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of this nature are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not expect material changes to our basic earnings per share calculations in 2009. All prior-period earnings per share data presented must be adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of this standard. There will be no change to our quarterly and annual basic earnings per share information for prior periods due to the adoption of this standard; however, the impact on quarterly and annual basic earnings per share is expected to be immaterial through 2008.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,"The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles"Comprehensive Income" ("SFAS No. 162"ASU 2011-05"). SFAS No. 162 is intendedUnder this ASU, an entity has the option to improvepresent the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principlesstatements. The ASU eliminates the option in U.S. GAAP to be usedpresent other comprehensive income in preparing financial statements that are presentedthe statement of changes in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for nongovernmental entities. It is not expected thatequity. With the provisionsissuance of SFAS No. 162 will have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 142-3,ASU 2011-12,"Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets"Comprehensive Income (Topic 22): ("FSP SFAS 142-3"). FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. It is not expected that the adoption of this standard on January 1, 2009 will significantly affect our results of operations or financial condition.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
In December 2007,Deferral of the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,"Noncontrolling InterestsEffective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of ARB No. 51"ASU 2011-05" ("SFAS No. 160"ASU 2011-12"). This standard amends ARB No. 51, in December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date of changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to establish accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and for the deconsolidationpresentation of subsidiaries. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest that should be reported as equity inreclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidatedface of the financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 160ASU 2011-05 and ASU 2011-12 are effective for fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and the standard isare required to be applied prospectively.retrospectively. The Company does not have a non-controlling interestis currently in any of its consolidated reporting entities and therefore this standard does not currently apply.compliance with these standards.
In December 2007,September 2011, the FASB amended SFAS No. 141,issued ASU 2011-08,"Business Combinations,"Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment" which establishes principles("ASU 2011-08"). This ASU permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity concludes it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it need not perform the two-step impairment test. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. These provisions are effectiveinterim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Adoption of2011. The Company will comply with this standard on January 1, 2009 will affect our results of operations and financial condition only if the Company acquires the assets of another entity subsequent toupon adoption date.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006in 2012.
4. Investment Securities
Investment securities at December 31, 20082011 and 20072010 are as follows:
2008 | Amortized cost | Unrealized gains | Unrealized losses | Fair value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | 11 | 1 | — | 12 | |||||||
Municipal bonds | 5,290 | — | (1,086) | 4,204 | ||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 23,966 | 459 | (5,133) | 19,292 | ||||||||
$ | 29,267 | 460 | (6,219) | 23,508 | ||||||||
Trading securities: | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 108 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 372 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 93 | |||||||||||
Common stock | 37 | |||||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 34,566 | |||||||||||
35,176 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 58,684 | |||||||||||
2007 | Amortized cost | Unrealized gains | Unrealized losses | Fair value | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | Amortized cost | Unrealized gains | Unrealized losses | Fair value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | 11 | 1 | — | 12 | $ | 9 | 2 | - | 11 | ||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 6,991 | 128 | (73) | 7,046 | 2,549 | - | (13) | 2,536 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 45,893 | 170 | (89) | 45,974 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 22,912 | 7,596 | (121) | 30,387 | 51,456 | 2,738 | (5,379) | 48,815 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 29,914 | 7,725 | (194) | 37,445 | $ | 99,907 | 2,910 | (5,481) | 97,336 | |||||||||||||||
Trading securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 118 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 502 | 500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 156 | 17,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | 74 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 12,618 | 20,242 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
13,468 | 38,161 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 50,913 | 135,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
2010 | Amortized cost | Unrealized gains | Unrealized losses | Fair value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Available for sale securities: | ||||||||||||
U.S. treasury bills(1) | $ | 56,961 | 56,961 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 10 | 2 | - | 12 | ||||||||
Municipal bonds | 2,729 | - | (185) | 2,544 | ||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 28,633 | 5,662 | (37) | 34,258 | ||||||||
$ | 88,333 | 5,664 | (222) | 93,775 | ||||||||
Trading securities: | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper | 4,997 | |||||||||||
U.S. treasury bills(1) | 60,958 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 73 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds | 487 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 50 | |||||||||||
Common stock | 201 | |||||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 32,070 | |||||||||||
98,836 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 192,611 | |||||||||||
A summary of available for sale debt securities and affiliated mutual funds with marketfair values below carrying values at December 31, 20082011 is as follows:
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value | Unrealized (losses) | Fair value | Unrealized (losses) | Fair value | Unrealized (losses) | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | 4,204 | (1,086) | — | — | 4,204 | (1,086) | |||||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 16,574 | (5,076) | 51 | (57) | 16,625 | (5,133) | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 20,778 | (6,162) | 51 | (57) | 20,829 | (6,219) | |||||||||||
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value | Unrealized losses | Fair value | Unrealized losses | Fair value | Unrealized losses | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | - | - | 2,536 | (13) | 2,536 | (13) | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 16,769 | (89) | - | - | 16,769 | (89) | ||||||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 36,801 | (5,362) | 209 | (17) | 37,010 | (5,379) | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 53,570 | (5,451) | 2,745 | (30) | 56,315 | (5,481) | |||||||||||
Based upon our assessment of these municipal bonds, corporate bonds and affiliated mutual funds, the time frame investments have been in a loss position, our intent to hold the affiliated mutual funds until they have recovered and our history of holding bonds until maturity, we determined that a write-down was not appropriatenecessary at December 31, 2008.
Mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds accounted for as available-for sale and held as of December 31, 2008 mature as follows:
| Amortized cost | Fair value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
After one year but within ten years | $ | 4,300 | 3,541 | |||
After ten years | 1,001 | 675 | ||||
$ | 5,301 | 4,216 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds and corporate bonds accounted for as trading and held as of December 31, 2008 mature as follows:
| |||
| |||
Investment securities with fair values of $1.1 million, $10.9 million and $15.5 million were sold during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2008, a net loss of $31 thousand was recognized from the sale of $1.1 million in trading securities. A net gain of $3.6 million was recognized during 2007 from the sale of $10.4 million in available-for-sale securities. During 2006, a net gain of $3.3 million was recognized from the sale of $14.8 million in available-for-sale securities.
The aggregate carrying amount of our equity method investments, classified in other assets, was $3.9 million and $3.6 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2008, our investment consists of a limited partnership interest in venture capital funds.2011.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
SFAS No. 157 specifiesDuring the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $3.7 million to reflect the "other than temporary" decline in value of certain of the Company's investments in affiliated mutual funds as the fair value of these investments had been below cost for an extended period. This charge is recorded in investment and other income in the consolidated statement of income for 2009.
Mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds and corporate bonds accounted for as available for sale and held as of December 31, 2011 mature as follows:
| Amortized cost | Fair value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
Within one year | $ | 14,680 | 14,619 | |||
After one year but within 10 years | 32,770 | 32,913 | ||||
After 10 years | 1,001 | 989 | ||||
$ | 48,451 | 48,521 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds and corporate bonds accounted for as trading and held as of December 31, 2011 mature as follows:
| Fair value | | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | | ||||
Within one year | $ | 5,081 | ||||
After one year but within 10 years | 12,738 | |||||
After 10 years | 63 | |||||
$ | 17,882 | |||||
Investment securities with fair values of $55.7 million, $45.1 million and $24.7 million were sold during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During 2011, net realized gains of $2.3 million and $1.4 million were recognized from the sale of $22.1 million in available for sale securities and the sale of $33.6 million in trading securities, respectively. During 2010, net realized gains of $2.9 million and $2.9 million were recognized from the sale of $24.2 million in available for sale securities and the sale of $20.9 million in trading securities, respectively. During 2009, net gains of $2.6 million and $126 thousand were recognized from the sale of $14.7 million in available for sale securities and the sale of $10.0 million in trading securities, respectively.
The aggregate carrying amount of our equity method investments, classified in other assets, was $5.6 million and $6.9 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011, our investments consist of limited partnership interests in venture capital funds.
Accounting standards establish a framework for measuring fair value and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of the asset. Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset. An individual investment's fair value measurement is assigned a level based upon the
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, these inputs areis summarized in the three broad levels listed below:as follows:
In determiningAssets classified as Level 2 can have a variety of observable inputs, including, but not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker quotes, benchmark securities and bid/offer quotations. These observable inputs are collected and utilized, primarily by an independent pricing service, in different evaluated pricing approaches depending upon the appropriate levels,specific asset to determine a value. Securities' values classified as Level 3 are primarily determined through the Company performsuse of a detailed analysis ofsingle quote (or multiple quotes) from dealers in the assetssecurities using proprietary valuation models. These quotes involve significant unobservable inputs, and liabilities thatthus the related securities are subject to SFAS No. 157.classified as Level 3 securities.
The following table presents fair value measurementstables summarize our investment securities as of December 31, 2008:2011 and 2010 that are recognized in our consolidated balance sheets using fair value measurements based on the differing levels of inputs:
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Investment securities | $ | 53,895 | 4,789 | — | $ | 58,684 |
2011 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | - | 74 | - | 74 | |||||||
Municipal bonds | - | 3,036 | - | 3,036 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | - | 63,293 | - | 63,293 | ||||||||
Common stock | 37 | - | - | 37 | ||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 69,057 | - | - | 69,057 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 69,094 | $ | 66,403 | $ | - | $ | 135,497 | ||||
2010 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Commercial paper | $ | 4,997 | - | - | 4,997 | |||||||
U.S. treasury bills | 117,919 | - | - | 117,919 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | - | 85 | 85 | |||||||||
Municipal bonds | - | 3,031 | - | 3,031 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | - | 50 | - | 50 | ||||||||
Common stock | 201 | - | - | 201 | ||||||||
Affiliated mutual funds | 66,328 | - | - | 66,328 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 189,445 | $ | 3,166 | $ | - | $ | 192,611 | ||||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
5. Property and Equipment
A summary of property and equipment at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | Estimated useful lives | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | | |||||||
Leasehold improvements | $ | 19,678 | 19,827 | 1 - 15 years | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 31,840 | 30,137 | 3 - 10 years | ||||||
Equipment | 18,864 | 17,366 | 3 - 26 years | ||||||
Computer software | 72,799 | 67,830 | 3 - 10 years | ||||||
Data processing equipment | 21,178 | 22,190 | 5 - 10 years | ||||||
Building | 3,765 | - | 10 - 30 years | ||||||
Land | 1,940 | - | |||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 170,064 | 157,350 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (96,036) | (86,102) | |||||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 74,028 | 71,248 | ||||||
Depreciation expense was $15.2 million, $14.0 million and $13.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
At December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had property and equipment under capital leases with a cost of $1.8 million and accumulated depreciation of $1.0 million.
6. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets of an acquired business. Our goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The activity related to goodwillGoodwill and identifiable intangible assets (all considered indefinite lived) is summarizedat December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
| December 31, 2007 | Goodwill Impairment | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 212,077 | (9,559) | 202,518 | ||||||
Accumulated amortization | (38,644) | 2,337 | (36,307) | |||||||
Total goodwill | 173,433 | (7,222) | 166,211 | |||||||
Mutual fund management advisory contracts | 38,699 | — | 38,699 | |||||||
Mutual fund subadvisory management contracts | 16,300 | — | 16,300 | |||||||
Total indentifiable intangible assets | 54,999 | — | 54,999 | |||||||
Total | $ | 228,432 | (7,222) | 221,210 | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
Goodwill | $ | 202,518 | 202,518 | |||
Accumulated amortization | (36,307) | (36,307) | ||||
Total goodwill | 166,211 | 166,211 | ||||
Mutual fund management advisory contracts | 38,699 | 38,699 | ||||
Mutual fund management subadvisory contracts | 16,300 | 16,300 | ||||
Total indentifiable intangible assets | 54,999 | 54,999 | ||||
Total | $ | 221,210 | 221,210 | |||
Based on our In 2011, the Company's annual review ofimpairment test indicated that goodwill in the second quarter of 2006, in accordance with SFAS No. 142,"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," we recorded an impairment charge of $20.0 million related to our subsidiary, Austin Calvert & Flavin, Inc. ("ACF"). Factors that led to this conclusion included, butidentifiable intangible assets were not limitedimpaired. Related to goodwill, the negative impact of the decline in ACF's assets under management and diminished involvement of ACF's investment staff in mutual fund advisory responsibilities. Asset redemptions significantly impacted ACF's ability to achieve and maintain profitability, and therefore adversely impacted its earnings potential.
The implied fair value of allthe investment management and related services reporting unitsunit exceeded theirits carrying amounts atvalue by more than 100% and the timefair value of our annual review of goodwill in the second quarter of 2008. Due to the decline in the financial markets during theLegend
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
second halfreporting unit exceeded its carrying value by more than 65%. The fair value of 2008, we performed another reviewour indefinite-life intangible assets exceeded their respective carrying values by more than 90%.
The Company has recognized total goodwill impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles in the fourth quarter. We recorded an impairment charge of $7.2$27.2 million, to write off the remaining balance of goodwillall related to a subsidiary sold in 2009, Austin Calvert & Flavin, Inc. ("ACF"), since the adoption of"Intangibles — Goodwill and Other Topic," ASC 350 in 2002.
7. Sale of Austin, Calvert & Flavin, Inc.
On July 15, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary, ACF, based on declines in ACF'spursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated June 26, 2009. Prior to the closing date, ACF had 10 employees and assets under management andof $488.0 million. The agreement included an earnout provision based on a percentage of revenues on existing accounts over the related adverse impact on its earnings potential.three-year period subsequent to the closing date. The goodwill impairment charges related to ACF were not deductible for income tax purposes and as a result, no tax benefit has been recognized for these charges.
6. Property and Equipment
A summary of property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
| 2008 | 2007 | Estimated useful lives | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | | |||||||
Leasehold improvements | $ | 14,707 | 7,337 | 1 - 15 years | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 27,810 | 23,726 | 5 - 10 years | ||||||
Equipment and machinery | 21,622 | 21,675 | 5 - 20 years | ||||||
Computer software | 50,645 | 41,201 | 5 - 10 years | ||||||
Data processing equipment | 20,658 | 17,652 | 5 - 10 years | ||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 135,442 | 111,591 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (75,476) | (63,607) | |||||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 59,966 | 47,984 | ||||||
Depreciation expenseearnout provision was $13.2 million, $12.4 million and $11.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, we have property and equipment under capital leasefully settled with a cost of $724 thousand and accumulated depreciation of $102 thousand.payment received during 2010.
7. Restructuring
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce our operating costs. We completed the restructuring by December 31, 2008, which included a voluntary separation of 169 employees and the termination of various projects under development. We recorded a pre-tax restructuring chargecharges for severance and other transaction costs of $16.5 million, consisting of $15.0$1.1 million in employee compensation and other benefit costs, $795 thousand for accelerated vestingconnection with the divestiture of nonvested stock and $717 thousandour investment in project development costs, including $500 thousand for the early termination of a contract. The restructuring charge isACF in 2009, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the 2009 consolidated statement of income.
Table For tax purposes, this sale resulted in a capital loss of Contents
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The activity$28.4 million, a portion of which was utilized against capital gains in the accrued restructuring liability is summarized as follows:
| Restructuring Charges | Cash Payments | Non-cash Settlements and Other | Accrued Liability as of December 31, 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employee compensation and other benefit costs | $ | 15,025 | (269) | (226) | 14,530 | |||||||
Share-based compensation expense | 795 | — | (795) | — | ||||||||
Contract termination and project development costs | 717 | — | (217) | 500 | ||||||||
$ | 16,537 | (269) | (1,238) | 15,030 | ||||||||
We expectcurrent period and prior periods. See Note 9 for information related to the remaining restructuring costs to be paid out through 2010, with the majority paid out by the end of 2009. The long-term portion of the restructuring liability of $2.7 million is included in Other liabilities and the short-term portion of $12.3 million is included in Other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.capital loss.
8. Indebtedness
On August 15, 2000, the Company filed a $400.0 million shelf registration, whereby proceeds received could be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of short-term debt outstanding. On January 18, 2001, the Company issued $200.0 million in principal amount 7.50% senior notes due in January 2006 (the "7.50% Notes"), resulting in net proceeds of approximately $197.6 million (net of discounts, commissions and expenses).
During 2005, the Company entered into two forward starting interest rate swap agreements that had five year fixed swap rates of 4.57% and 4.84%, respectively, on notional amounts of $100.0 million for each swap. The swaps were put in place to hedge against changes in forecasted interest payments attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate between the time the Company entered into the swap agreement and the time we anticipated refinancing the 7.50% Notes in January 2006. The Company assessed the effectiveness of the swaps as hedges at their inception and at December 31, 2005, and we considered those swaps to be completely effective cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133. As of December 31, 2005, net unrealized gains attributed to the forward swap cash flow hedges were approximately $1.6 million and were included as a component of other comprehensive income.
On January 13, 2006, the Company issued $200.0 million in principal amount 5.60% senior notes due 2011 (the "New Notes""Notes") resulting in net proceeds of approximately $198.2 million (net of discounts, commissions and estimated expenses). The Company used these proceeds, together with cash on hand, to repay the entire $200.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 7.50% Notes. The New Notes represent senior unsecured obligations and are rated "Baa2" by Moody's and "BBB" by Standard & Poor's. Interest iswas payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 at a fixed rate of 5.60% per annum. The Company may, at its option, call the NewUpon issuance of these Notes, at any time pursuant to a make whole redemption provision, which would compensate holders for any changes in interest rate levels of the notes upon early extinguishment. The Company currently has no intention to call the New Notes.
On January 10, 2006, the Company terminated the two 2005 forward interest rate swap agreements upon the closing of the New Notes.entered into in 2005. In connection with the termination, of the swap agreements, the
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Companywe received a net cash settlement of $1.1 million. The Company's gain on these transactions was deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and is being amortized into earnings as a reduction to interest expense over the five year term of the New Notes. AsNotes and was fully amortized as of December 31, 2008,2010. During the remaining unamortized amount was approximately $0.5 million.first quarter of 2010, we repurchased $10.0 million of the Notes.
TheOn August 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to complete a 364-day revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with various lenders, effective October 6, 2008, which initially provides for borrowings$190.0 million private placement of up to $175.0senior unsecured notes that were issued and sold in two tranches: $95.0 million and replaced the Company's previous three-year revolving credit facility. Lenders could, at their option upon the Company's request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. At December 31, 2008 there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bearbearing interest at various rates including adjusted LIBOR or an alternative base rate plus, in each case, an incremental margin based on5.0% and maturing January 13, 2018 (the "Series A Notes") and $95.0 million bearing interest of 5.75% and maturing January 13, 2021 (the "Series B Notes") (collectively, the Company's credit rating. The Credit Facility also provides for a facility fee on the daily aggregate amount of commitment under the revolving facility (whether or not utilized)"Senior Notes"). The facility feeagreement contained a delayed funding provision that allowed the Company to draw down the proceeds in January 2011 when the Notes matured. The Company used the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Senior Notes to repay in full the Notes. Interest is also based on the Company's credit rating level.payable semi-annually in January and July of each year. The most restrictive provisions of the credit agreement require the Company to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.0 to 1.0 for four consecutive quarters and a consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 4.0 to 1.0 for four consecutive quarters. The Company was in compliance with these covenants and similar covenants in prior facilities for all yearsperiods presented.
The Company entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with various lenders, effective October 5, 2009, which provided for initial borrowings of up to $125.0 million and replaced the Company's previous revolving credit facility.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The Company entered into a three year revolving credit facility (the "New Credit Facility") with various lenders, effective August 31, 2010, which provides for initial borrowings of up to $125.0 million and replaced the Credit Facility. Lenders could, at their option upon the Company's request, expand the New Credit Facility to $200.0 million. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no borrowings outstanding under the facility. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility bear interest at various rates including adjusted LIBOR or an alternative base rate plus, in each case, an incremental margin based on the Company's credit rating. The New Credit Facility also provides for a facility fee on the aggregate amount of commitments under the revolving facility (whether or not utilized). The facility fee is also based on the Company's credit rating level. The New Credit Facility's covenants match those outlined above for the Senior Notes.
Debt is reported at its carrying amount in the consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the Company's outstanding indebtedness is approximately $191.6 million at December 31, 2011 compared to the carrying value of $190.0 million. The following is a summary of long-term debt at December 31, 20082011 and 2007:2010:
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||
Principal amount unsecured 5.60% senior notes due in 2011 | $ | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||
Discount on unsecured 5.60% senior notes due in 2011 | (31) | (45) | |||||
Total long-term debt | $ | 199,969 | 199,955 | ||||
9. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||
Currently payable: | |||||||
Federal | $ 59,149 | 72,760 | 39,770 | ||||
State | 3,149 | 5,092 | 3,823 | ||||
62,298 | 77,852 | 43,593 | |||||
Deferred taxes | (2,041) | (4,189) | (505) | ||||
Provision for income taxes | $ 60,257 | 73,663 | 43,088 | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
Principal amount unsecured 5.0% senior notes due in 2018 | $ | 95,000 | - | |||
Principal amount unsecured 5.75% senior notes due in 2021 | 95,000 | - | ||||
Principal amount unsecured 5.60% senior notes due in 2011 | - | 190,000 | ||||
Discount on unsecured 5.60% senior notes due in 2011 | - | (1) | ||||
Total | $ | 190,000 | 189,999 | |||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
9. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 consists of the following:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
Currently payable: | |||||||||
Federal | $ | 95,224 | 87,350 | 48,249 | |||||
State | 9,651 | 7,381 | 4,312 | ||||||
104,875 | 94,731 | 52,561 | |||||||
Deferred taxes | 2,394 | (5,206) | 4,090 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 107,269 | 89,525 | 56,651 | |||||
The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate with our effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006:2009:
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statutory federal income tax rate | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | ||||||
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | ||||||
State tax incentives | (0.3) | (0.1) | (1.2) | ||||||
Nondeductible fines | — | — | 4.7 | ||||||
Nondeductible goodwill impairment expense | 1.6 | — | 7.8 | ||||||
Other items | 0.8 | — | 0.3 | ||||||
Effective income tax rate | 38.5% | 37.0% | 48.3% | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statutory federal income tax rate | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% | ||||||
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.9 | ||||||
State tax incentives | (0.2) | (0.2) | (0.7) | ||||||
Sale of ACF | - | - | (6.0) | ||||||
Valuation allowance on losses capital in nature | (0.1) | (1.1) | 4.1 | ||||||
Other items | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | ||||||
Effective income tax rate | 37.9% | 36.3% | 34.9% | ||||||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets at December 31, 20082011 and 20072010 are as follows:
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||
Unrealized pension benefits | $ — | (785) | ||||
Deferred sales commissions | (6,019) | (6,754) | ||||
Property and equipment | (9,213) | (8,794) | ||||
Benefit plans | (3,609) | (3,037) | ||||
Identifiable intangible assets | (8,359) | (8,374) | ||||
Unrealized gains on derivatives | (165) | (248) | ||||
Unrealized gains on available for sale investment securities | — | (2,753) | ||||
Purchase of fund assets | (4,189) | (3,423) | ||||
Prepaid expenses | (1,544) | (1,413) | ||||
Other | (323) | (242) | ||||
Total gross deferred liabilities | (33,421) | (35,823) | ||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||
Acquisition lease liability | 784 | 1,029 | ||||
Additional pension and postretirement liability | 12,978 | — | ||||
Accrued expenses | 11,225 | 6,753 | ||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities | 2,333 | 676 | ||||
Nonvested stock | 10,827 | 11,240 | ||||
State tax credit carryforwards | 337 | 174 | ||||
State net operating loss carryforwards | 4,698 | 3,527 | ||||
Other | 2,242 | 2,828 | ||||
Total gross deferred assets | 45,424 | 26,227 | ||||
Valuation allowance | (4,385) | (3,527) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ 7,618 | (13,123) | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||
Deferred sales commissions | $ | (7,861) | (7,880) | |||
Property and equipment | (13,240) | (10,489) | ||||
Benefit plans | (9,617) | (5,651) | ||||
Identifiable intangible assets | (8,523) | (8,449) | ||||
Unrealized gains on investment securities | - | (2,002) | ||||
Purchase of fund assets | (6,631) | (5,793) | ||||
Prepaid expenses | (2,596) | (1,600) | ||||
Other | - | (22) | ||||
Total gross deferred liabilities | (48,468) | (41,886) | ||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||
Acquisition lease liability | 1,135 | 1,308 | ||||
Additional pension and postretirement liability | 26,403 | 13,171 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 13,438 | 12,120 | ||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities | 2,329 | 1,375 | ||||
Capital loss carryforwards | 3,022 | 3,631 | ||||
Nonvested stock | 19,051 | 14,974 | ||||
Unused state tax credits | 1,123 | 1,131 | ||||
State net operating loss carryforwards | 6,055 | 5,464 | ||||
Other | 4,012 | 2,838 | ||||
Total gross deferred assets | 76,568 | 56,012 | ||||
Valuation allowance | (11,374) | (8,233) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 16,726 | 5,893 | |||
CertainIn 2009, the Company sold ACF, which generated a capital loss available to offset potential future capital gains. Due to the character of the loss and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, the Company may not realize the full tax benefit of the capital loss. The capital loss carryforward, if not utilized, will expire in 2014. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had a deferred tax asset, net of federal tax effect, for a capital loss carryforward of $3.0 million and other net deferred tax assets that were capital in nature of $2.6 million. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a deferred tax asset, net of federal tax effect, for a capital loss carryforward of $3.6 million and other net deferred tax liabilities which were capital in nature of approximately $0.6 million. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future capital gains to realize the full benefit of these capital losses and accordingly, a valuation allowance in the amount of $5.6 million and $3.0 million has been recorded at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During 2011, declines in the Company's investment portfolios resulted in an increase of $2.6 million in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets that are capital in nature. The decline in the investment portfolios was partially offset by realized capital gains in 2011, which allowed for the release of $0.4 million of the valuation allowance as a reduction to tax expense. The remaining $3.0 million increase in the valuation allowance was recorded as an increase to accumulated
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
other comprehensive loss. Certain subsidiaries of the Company have net operating loss carryforwards in certain states in which these companies file on a separate company basis. The deferred tax asset, net of federal tax effect, relating
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
to the carryforwards as of December 31, 20082011 and December 31, 20072010 is approximately $4.7$6.1 million and $3.5$5.5 million, respectively. The carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire between 20092012 and 2028.2031. Management believes it is not more likely than not that these subsidiaries will generate sufficient future taxable income in these states to realize the benefit of the net operating loss carryforwards and, accordingly, a valuation allowance in the amount of $4.4$5.8 million and $3.5$5.2 million has been establishedrecorded at December 31, 20082011 and December 31, 2007,2010, respectively. The Company generatedhas state tax credits in 2007credit carryforwards of $1.1 million as of both December 31, 2011 and 2008 that2010. Of these state tax credit carryforwards, $0.8 million will expire between 2019 and 2021 if not utilized and $0.3 million will expire in 2017 and 2018, respectively,2027 if not utilized. The Company anticipates these credits will be fully utilized prior to their expiration date.
As of January 1, 2008,2011, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits, including penalties and interest, of $6.2$6.6 million ($4.24.6 million net of federal benefit) that, if recognized, would impact the Company's effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2008,2011, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits, including penalties and interest, of $4.9$9.8 million ($3.46.9 million net of federal benefit) that, if recognized, would impact the Company's effective tax rate. The unrecognized tax benefits that are not expected to be settled within the next 12 months are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet;sheets; unrecognized tax benefits that are expected to be settled within the next 12 months are included in income taxes payable.
The Company's historical accounting policy with respect to interest and penalties related to income tax uncertainties has beenis to classify these amounts as income taxes, and the Company continued this classification upon the adoption of FIN 48.taxes. As of January 1, 2008,2011, the total amount of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions recognized in the consolidated balance sheet was $1.7$1.9 million ($1.31.5 million net of federal benefit). The total amount of penalties and interest, net of federal benefit, related to tax uncertainties recognized in the statement of income for the period ended December 31, 20082011 was $385 thousand.$0.3 million. The total amount of accrued penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions at December 31, 20082011 of $1.6$2.3 million ($1.21.8 million net of federal benefit) is included in the total unrecognized tax benefits described above.
The following table summarizes the Company's reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding penalties and interest, for the yearyears ended December 31, 2008:2011, 2010 and 2009:
In the ordinary course of business, many transactions occur for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. In addition, respective tax authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits examine our significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. In 2008,During 2011, the Company received notification of a favorable outcome on a tax position that the Company had previously considered partially uncertain, and therefore, had not previously recognized the full tax benefit. The Company did not settle any open tax years undergoing audits by state jurisdictions in which the Company operates. During 2010, the Company settled fivenine open tax years that were undergoing auditaudits by a state jurisdictionjurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Company also received
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
notification of a favorable outcome on a tax position in whichthat the Company had previously considered partially uncertain, and therefore, had not previously recognized the full tax benefit. During 2007,2009, the Company settled twothree open tax years that were undergoing audit by a state jurisdiction in which the Company operates. During 2006, the Company settled four open tax years, 2000 through 2004, that were undergoing audit by the United States Internal Revenue Service. The 2005, 2006,2008, 2009 and 20072010 federal income tax returns are the only open tax years that remain subject to potential future audit. The 2005, 2006 and 2007 federal tax years also remain open to a limited extent due to capital loss carryback claims. State income tax returns for all years after 20042007 and, in certain states, income tax returns for 2003,prior to 2008, are subject to potential future audit by tax authorities in the Company's major state tax jurisdictions.
The Company is currently being audited in threevarious state jurisdictions. It is reasonably possible that the Company will settle the audits in these jurisdictions within the next 12-month period. It is estimated that the Company's FIN 48 liability for unrecognized tax benefits, including penalties and interest, could decrease by approximately $912 thousand$0.5 million to $1.6$2.8 million ($607 thousand0.3 million to $1.1$1.9 million net of federal benefit) upon settlement of these audits. Such settlements are not anticipated to have a significant impact on the results of operations.
10. Pension Plan and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension
We provide a non-contributory retirement plan that covers substantially all employees and certain vested employees of our former parent company (the "Pension Plan"). Benefits payable under the Pension Plan are based on employees' years of service and compensation during the final ten years of employment. We also sponsor an unfunded defined benefit postretirement medical plan that covers substantially all employees, including Waddell & Reed and Legend advisors. The medical plan is contributory with retiree contributions adjusted annually. The medical plan does not provide for post age 65 benefits with the exception of a small group of employees that were grandfathered when such plan was established.
A reconciliation of the funded status of these plans and the assumptions related to the obligations at December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009 follows:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Change in projected benefit obligation: | |||||||||||||
Net benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ 94,893 | 88,320 | 86,530 | 3,975 | 4,174 | 3,715 | |||||||
Service cost | 5,727 | 5,718 | 5,446 | 296 | 292 | 299 | |||||||
Interest cost | 6,326 | 5,490 | 4,830 | 262 | 244 | 209 | |||||||
Plan amendments | — | — | — | — | — | 165 | |||||||
Benefits and expenses paid | (6,553) | (3,690) | (3,496) | (616) | (313) | (244) | |||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss | (1,799) | (945) | (4,990) | 1,126 | (570) | (107) | |||||||
Retiree contributions | — | — | — | 162 | 148 | 137 | |||||||
Net benefit obligation at end of year | $ 98,594 | 94,893 | 88,320 | 5,205 | 3,975 | 4,174 | |||||||
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Change in projected benefit obligation: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 118,860 | 110,962 | 98,594 | 6,850 | 5,945 | 5,205 | |||||||||||
Service cost | 7,101 | 6,140 | 5,276 | 558 | 443 | 371 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost | 7,195 | 6,596 | 6,386 | 402 | 364 | 343 | ||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (6,522) | (6,589) | (11,692) | (554) | (528) | (493) | ||||||||||||
Actuarial loss | 21,778 | 1,751 | 12,398 | 530 | 389 | 362 | ||||||||||||
Retiree contributions | - | - | - | 359 | 237 | 157 | ||||||||||||
Net benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 148,412 | 118,860 | 110,962 | 8,145 | 6,850 | 5,945 | |||||||||||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Pension Plan was $86.9$124.7 million and $81.3$102.7 million at December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively.
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Change in plan assets: | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 106,568 | 91,551 | 78,020 | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets | (6,642) | 9,106 | 15,223 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Employer contributions | 10,000 | 12,500 | 10,000 | 195 | 291 | 336 | ||||||||||||
Retiree contributions | - | - | - | 359 | 237 | 157 | ||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (6,522) | (6,589) | (11,692) | (554) | (528) | (493) | ||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 103,404 | 106,568 | 91,551 | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Funded status at end of year | $ | (45,008) | (12,292) | (19,411) | (8,145) | (6,850) | (5,945) | |||||||||||
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||||
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position: | ||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | $ | - | - | - | (289) | (303) | (250) | |||||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities | (45,008) | (12,292) | (19,411) | (7,856) | (6,547) | (5,695) | ||||||||||||
Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | (45,008) | (12,292) | (19,411) | (8,145) | (6,850) | (5,945) | |||||||||||
Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||
Transition obligation | $ | (37) | (42) | (47) | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Prior service cost | (2,932) | (3,486) | (4,041) | (183) | (238) | (284) | ||||||||||||
Accumulated loss | (66,747) | (31,369) | (32,842) | (999) | (469) | (79) | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (69,716) | (34,897) | (36,930) | (1,182) | (707) | (363) | ||||||||||||
Cumulative employer contributions in | ||||||||||||||||||
excess of net periodic benefit cost | 24,708 | 22,605 | 17,519 | (6,963) | (6,143) | (5,582) | ||||||||||||
Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | (45,008) | (12,292) | (19,411) | (8,145) | (6,850) | (5,945) | |||||||||||
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at December 31: | ||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 4.99% | 6.00% | 6.25% | 5.00% | 6.00% | 6.25% | ||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 4.04% | 3.86% | 3.86% | Not applicable |
In 2011, the discount rate assumption used to determine the pension and other postretirement benefits obligations was based on the Aon Hewitt AA Only Above Median Yield Curve. This discount rate was determined separately for each plan by plotting the expected benefit payments from each plan against a yield curve of high quality, zero coupon bonds and calculating the single rate that would produce the same present value of liabilities as the yield curve. Prior to 2011, the discount rate assumption was based on the Mercer Bond Model, which calculated the yield on a theoretical portfolio of high-grade corporate bonds with cash flows that generally matched our expected benefit payments. To the extent scheduled bond
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in plan assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 109,822 | 82,889 | 74,445 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets | (30,249) | 23,622 | 4,940 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Employer contributions | 5,000 | 7,000 | 7,000 | 454 | 165 | 107 | ||||||||||||||
Retiree contributions | — | — | — | 162 | 148 | 137 | ||||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (6,553) | (3,689) | (3,496) | (616) | (313) | (244) | ||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 78,020 | 109,822 | 82,889 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Funded status at end of year | $ | (20,574) | 14,929 | (5,431) | (5,205) | (3,975) | (4,174) | |||||||||||||
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentage data) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position under SFAS No. 158: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent assets | $ | – | 14,929 | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | – | – | – | (252) | (192) | (209) | ||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities | (20,574) | – | (5,431) | (4,953) | (3,783) | (3,965) | ||||||||||||||||
Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | (20,574) | 14,929 | (5,431) | (5,205) | (3,975) | (4,174) | |||||||||||||||
Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition obligation | $ | (52) | (57) | (62) | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
Prior service cost | (4,596) | (3,714) | (4,149) | (323) | (362) | (400) | ||||||||||||||||
Accumulated gain (loss) | (30,835) | 4,792 | (14,143) | 283 | 1,489 | 958 | ||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (35,483) | 1,021 | (18,354) | (40) | 1,127 | 558 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative employer contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost | 14,909 | 13,908 | 12,923 | (5,165) | (5,102) | (4,732) | ||||||||||||||||
Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | (20,574) | 14,929 | (5,431) | (5,205) | (3,975) | (4,174) | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at December 31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 6.75% | 6.75% | 6.00% | 6.75% | 6.75% | 6.00% | ||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | (1) | 3.86% | 3.86% | Not applicable |
The discount rate assumptions used to determine the postretirement obligations at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the postretirement expenses in 2008 were based on the Mercer Bond Model. This model was designed by Mercer Human Resource Consulting to provide a means for plan sponsors to value the liabilities of their postretirement benefit plans. The Mercer Bond Model calculates the yield on a theoretical portfolio of high-grade corporate bonds (rated "Aa" or better) with cash flows that generally match our expected benefit payments. To the extent scheduled bond proceeds exceedexceeded the estimated benefit payments in a given period, the yield calculation assumesassumed those excess proceeds arewere reinvested at the one-year forward rates implied by the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Our Pension Plan asset allocation at December 31, 20082011 and 2007 and our target allocation for 2009 are2010 is as follows:
Plan assets by investment style | Target Allocation at January 1, 2009 | Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Large Cap Growth | 40% | 41% | |||||
Asset Strategy | 35% | 38% | |||||
Core Plus Fixed Income | 13% | 10% | |||||
Science and Technology | 10% | 9% | |||||
Cash Reserves | 2% | 2% | |||||
Total | 100% | 100% | |||||
Plan assets by category | Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31, 2008 | Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31, 2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity securities | 67% | 75% | |||||
Debt securities | 19% | 15% | |||||
Cash | 14% | 10% | |||||
Total | 100% | 100% | |||||
Plan assets by category | Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31, 2011 | Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31, 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | 7% | 5% | ||||
Equity securities: | ||||||
Domestic | 43% | 34% | ||||
International | 38% | 47% | ||||
Gold bullion | 12% | 14% | ||||
Total | 100% | 100% | ||||
The primary investment objective is to maximize growth of the Pension Plan assets to meet the projected obligations to the beneficiaries over a long period of time, and to do so in a manner that is consistent with the Company's earnings strength and risk tolerance. Asset allocation is the most important decision in managing the assets and it is reviewed regularly. The asset allocation policy considers the Company's financial strength and long-term asset class risk/return expectations since the obligations are long-term in nature. The target allocations for pensionAs of December 31, 2011, our Pension Plan assets are as summarizedwere invested in the table above. The assets are well diversifiedour Asset Strategy style, and are managed by our in-house investment professionals.
Large Cap Growth consists of a diversified portfolio of common stocks issued by higher-quality growth-oriented large to medium sized domestic and, to a lesser extent, foreign companies. Asset Strategy invests in the domestic or foreign market that is believed to offer the greatest probability of return or, alternatively, that provides the highest degree of safety in uncertain times. Although thisThis style may allocate its assets among stocks, bonds and short-term investments and since the allocation is typically weighted toward stocks. Core Plus Fixed Income invests primarilydynamically managed and able to take advantage of opportunities as they are presented by the market, there is not a predetermined asset allocation. Dependent on the outlook for the U.S. and global economies, our investment managers make top-down allocations among stocks, bonds, cash, precious metals and currency markets around the globe. After determining allocations, we seek the best opportunities within each market. Derivative instruments play an important role in investment-grade debt securities issuedthis style's investment process, to manage risk and maximize stability of the assets in the United States. Science and Technology concentrates its investments primarilyportfolio.
At December 31, 2011, the Pension Plan had multiple investment concentrations that are not typical of a classic pension plan, including a significant weighting of plan assets invested in equity securities, including 38% international equities, of domesticwhich a third was invested in Chinese equities. The Pension Plan also had 12% of plan assets invested in gold bullion.
Risk management is primarily the responsibility of the investment portfolio manager, who incorporates it with their day-to-day research and foreignmanagement. Although investment flexibility is essential to this style's investment process, the Pension Plan does not invest in a number of asset classes that are commonly referred to as alternative investments, namely venture capital, private equity funds, direct real estate properties, timber, or oil, gas or other mineral explorations or development programs or leases. The Pension Plan also has a number of specific guidelines that serve to manage investment risk by placing limits on net securities exposure and concentration of assets within specific companies or industries.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
We determine the fair value of our Pension Plan assets using broad levels of inputs as defined by related accounting standards and categorized as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3, as previously defined in Note 4. The following tables summarize our Pension Plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:
2011 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Equity securities: | ||||||||||||
Domestic | $ | 44,818 | - | - | 44,818 | |||||||
International | 38,942 | - | - | 38,942 | ||||||||
Fixed income securities: | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed security | - | 98 | - | 98 | ||||||||
Gold bullion | 12,857 | - | - | 12,857 | ||||||||
Total investment securities | 96,617 | 98 | - | 96,715 | ||||||||
Cash and other | 6,689 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 103,404 | ||||||||||
2010 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Equity securities: | ||||||||||||
Domestic | $ | 36,488 | - | - | 36,488 | |||||||
International | 49,864 | - | - | 49,864 | ||||||||
Fixed income securities: | ||||||||||||
Foreign bonds | - | 73 | - | 73 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed security | - | 130 | - | 130 | ||||||||
Gold bullion | 14,382 | - | - | 14,382 | ||||||||
Total investment securities | 100,734 | 203 | - | 100,937 | ||||||||
Cash and other | 5,631 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 106,568 | ||||||||||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The table that benefit byfollows summarizes the applicationactivity of science and technological discoveries.plan assets categorized as Level 3 for the year ended December 31, 2009. There was no Level 3 activity during the years ended December 31, 2011 or 2010.
Options | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
(in thousands) | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ | (11) | ||
Purchases, issuances and settlements | 262 | |||
Actual return on plan assets, sold during the period | (123) | |||
Proceeds from sales | (128) | |||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | $ | - | ||
The 7.75% expected long-term rate of return on Pension Plan assets reflects management's expectations of long-term average rates of return on funds invested to provide for benefits included in the projected benefit obligations. The plan expects a relatively high return because of the types of investment the portfolio incorporates, the success the portfolio managers have had with generating returns in excess of passive management in those types of investments, and the past history of returns. The ability to use a high concentration of equities, especially international equities, within the plan's investment policy presents portfolio managers the opportunity to earn higher returns than other investment strategies that are restricted to owning lower returning asset classes. The expected return is based on the outlook for inflation, fixed income returns and equity returns, while also considering historical returns, asset allocation and investment strategy.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The components of net periodic pension and other postretirement costs and the assumptions related to those costs consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006.2009:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | |||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 5,727 | 5,718 | 5,446 | 296 | 292 | 299 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost | 6,326 | 5,490 | 4,830 | 262 | 244 | 209 | |||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (8,614) | (6,442) | (5,694) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss amortization | — | 808 | 954 | (80) | (39) | (38) | |||||||||||||
Prior service cost amortization | 555 | 436 | 436 | 39 | 38 | 23 | |||||||||||||
Transition obligation amortization | 5 | 5 | 5 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 3,999 | 6,015 | 5,977 | 517 | 535 | 493 | ||||||||||||
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 7,101 | 6,140 | 5,276 | 558 | 443 | 371 | |||||||||||
Interest cost | 7,195 | 6,596 | 6,387 | 402 | 364 | 343 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (8,764) | (7,499) | (6,428) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Actuarial loss amortization | 1,805 | 1,617 | 1,595 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Prior service cost amortization | 555 | 555 | 555 | 55 | 45 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Transition obligation amortization | 5 | 5 | 5 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 7,897 | 7,414 | 7,390 | 1,015 | 852 | 753 | |||||||||||
The estimated net loss, prior service cost and transition obligation for the Pension Plan that will be amortized from Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal yearin 2012 are $1.6$4.1 million, $555 thousand and $5 thousand, respectively. The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the postretirement medical plan that will be amortized from Accumulated other comprehansive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $39 thousand.
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31: | |||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 6.75% | 6.00% | 5.75% | 6.75% | 6.00% | 5.75% | |||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 7.75% | 7.75% | 7.75% | Not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 3.86% | 3.86% | 3.86% | Not applicable |
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
the postretirement medical plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 2012 are $12 thousand and $55, thousand respectively.
| Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31: | ||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 6.00% | 6.25% | 6.75% | 6.00% | 6.25% | 6.75% | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 7.75% | 7.75% | 7.75% | Not applicable | ||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 3.86% | 3.86% | (1) | Not applicable |
We expect the following benefit payments to be paid, which reflect future service as appropriate:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
2009 | $ | 5,561 | 260 | |||
2010 | 5,347 | 334 | ||||
2011 | 7,133 | 378 | ||||
2012 | 8,352 | 411 | ||||
2013 | 8,416 | 447 | ||||
2014 through 2018 | 52,379 | 2,374 | ||||
$ | 87,188 | 4,204 | ||||
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | |||||
2012 | $ | 6,408 | 289 | |||
2013 | 7,823 | 364 | ||||
2014 | 8,572 | 407 | ||||
2015 | 8,034 | 424 | ||||
2016 | 10,096 | 450 | ||||
2017 through 2021 | 56,878 | 2,952 | ||||
$ | 97,811 | 4,886 | ||||
Our policy with respect to funding the Pension Plan is to fund at least the minimum required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and not more than the maximum amount deductible for tax purposes. All contributions made to the Pension Plan for 20082011, 2010 and 20072009 were voluntary. We anticipate thatContributions are not expected to exceed $20 million for 2012. A contribution of $10 million was made to the 2009 contribution will be made from cash generated from operations and will bePension Plan in the range from $7.0 to $12.0 million.January 2012.
All Company contributions to other postretirement medical benefits are voluntary, as the postretirement medical plan is not funded and is not subject to any minimum regulatory funding requirements. The contributions for each year represent claims paid for medical expenses, and we anticipate making the 20092012 expected contribution with cash generated from operations. Contributions by participants to the postretirement plan were $162$359 thousand, $237 thousand and $148$157 thousand for the years endingended December 31, 20082011, 2010 and 2007,2009, respectively.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
For measurement purposes, the initial health care cost trend rate was 9.51% for 2011, 10% for 2008, 20072010 and 2006.9% for 2009. The health care cost trend rate reflects anticipated increases in health care costs. The initial assumed growth rate of 10% in the first year9.51% for 2011 is assumed to gradually decline over the next five16 years to a rate of 5% in the fifth year.4.5%. The effect of a 1% annual increase in assumed cost trend rates would increase the December 31, 20082011 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $511$1.0 million, and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2011 by approximately $137 thousand. The effect of a 1% annual decrease in assumed cost trend rates would decrease the December 31, 2011 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $866 thousand, and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 20082011 by approximately $92 thousand. The effect of a 1% annual decrease in assumed cost trend rates would decrease the December 31, 2008 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $444 thousand, and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2008 by approximately $78$115 thousand.
We also sponsor the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated (the "SERP"), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan covering eligible employees. The SERP provides certain benefits for Company officers that the Pension Plan is prevented from providing because of compensation and benefit limits in the Internal Revenue Code.
The SERP was adopted to supplement the annual pension paid to certain senior executive officers. Each calendar year, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee") credits participants' SERP accounts with (i) an amount equal to 4% of the executive's base
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
salary, less the amount of the maximum employer matching contribution available under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) a non-formula award, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. There were no discretionary awards made to participants during 2008.2011, 2010 or 2009. Additionally, each calendar year, participants' accounts are credited (or charged) with an amount equal to the performance of certain hypothetical or investment vehicles since the last preceding year. Upon a participant's separation, or at such other time based on a pre-existing election by a participant, benefits accumulated under the SERP are payable in installments or in a lump sum. As of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, the aggregate liability to participants was $3.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively.$3.7 million.
At December 31, 2008,2011, the accrued pension and postretirement liability recorded onin the consolidated balance sheet was comprised of accrued pension costs of $20.6$45.0 million, an accrued liability for SERP benefits of $3.5 million and a liability for postretirement benefits in the amount of $5.0$7.8 million and an accrued liability for SERP benefits of $3.7 million. The current portion of postretirement liability of $0.3 million is included in other current liabilities on the balance sheet. At December 31, 2007,2010, the accrued pension and postretirement liability recorded on the balance sheet was comprised of an accrued liability for SERP benefitspension costs of $3.4$12.3 million, and a liability for postretirement benefits in the amount of $3.8$6.5 million and an accrued liability for SERP benefits of $3.7 million. The current portion of postretirement liability of $0.2$0.3 million is included in other current liabilities on the balance sheet.
11. Employee Savings Plan
We sponsor a defined contribution plan that qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code to provide retirement benefits to substantially all of our employees following the completion of an eligibility period. As allowed under Section 401(k), the plan provides tax-deferred salary deductions for eligible employees. Our matching contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009 were $4.0$4.7 million, $3.7$4.4 million and $3.4$1.6 million, respectively.
12. Stockholders' Equity
Earnings per Share
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, earnings per share were computed as follows:
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 96,163 | 125,497 | 46,112 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic | 82,331 | 80,781 | 81,353 | ||||||||||
Dilutive potential shares from stock options and certain nonvested stock awards | 1,638 | 2,043 | 1,859 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted | 83,969 | 82,824 | 83,212 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.17 | 1.55 | 0.57 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.15 | 1.52 | 0.55 |
Anti-dilutive Securities
Options to purchase 688 thousand shares, 659 thousand shares and 2.79 million shares of Class A common stock ("common stock") were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively because they were anti-dilutive. Also excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation were approximately 1.3 million shares, 265 thousand shares and
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
23612. Stockholders' Equity
Earnings per Share
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, earnings per share were computed as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 175,459 | 156,959 | 105,505 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic | 85,783 | 85,618 | 85,484 | ||||||
Dilutive potential shares from stock options | 10 | 29 | 60 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted | 85,793 | 85,647 | 85,544 | ||||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.23 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 2.05 | 1.83 | 1.23 |
Anti-dilutive Securities
Options to purchase 16 thousand shares, 203 thousand shares and 777 thousand shares of anti-dilutive nonvestedClass A common stock ("common stock") were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006, respectively.2009, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive.
Dividends
We declared dividends on our common stock of $0.76$0.85 per share, $0.68$0.77 per share and $0.60$0.76 per share for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively. As of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, other current liabilities included $16.1$21.4 million and $14.7$17.1 million, respectively, for dividends payable to stockholders.
The Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend on our common stock from $0.20 per share to $0.25 per share beginning with our fourth quarter 2011 dividend, paid on February 1, 2012.
Common Stock Repurchases
The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of our common stock in the open market and/or private purchases. The acquired shares may be used for corporate purposes, including shares issued to employees in our stock-based compensation programs. There were 3,349,8081,951,331 shares, 2,350,0542,043,545 shares and 1,139,1161,870,034 shares repurchased in the open market or privately during the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively, which includes 494,207 shares, 426,665 shares and 327,301 shares repurchased from employees who elected to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings with respect to vesting of stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
13. Share-Based Compensation
The Company has three stock-based compensation plans: the Company 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the "SI Plan"), the Company 1998 Executive Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated (the "ESA Plan") and the Company 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated (the "NED Plan") (collectively, the "Stock Plans").
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The SI Plan allows us to grant equity compensation awards, including, among other awards, non-qualified stock options and nonvested stock as part of our overall compensation program to attract and retain key personnel and encourage a greater personal financial investment in the Company. TheAll of the Stock Plans also allow us to grant non-qualified stock options and/or nonvested stock to promote the long-term growth of the Company. A maximum of 30,000,00030.0 million shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under the SI Plan. A maximum of 3,750,0003.75 million and 1,200,0001.2 million shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under the ESA Plan and NED Plan, respectively. In total, 13,182,3109,873,142 shares of common stock are available for issuance as of December 31, 20082011 under these plans. In addition, we make incentive payments under the Company 2003 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the "EIP") in the form of cash, stock options, nonvested stock or a combination thereof. Incentive awards paid under the EIP in the form of stock options or nonvested stock, or granted following the conversion of cash bonus amounts into stock options and/or nonvested stock, are issued out of shares reserved for issuance under the SI and ESA Plans. Generally, shares of common stock covered by terminated, surrendered or cancelled options, by forfeited nonvested stock, or by the forfeiture of other awards that do not result in issuance of shares of common stock are again available for awards under the plan from which they were terminated, surrendered, cancelled or forfeited.
Under our Stock Plans, the exercise price of a stock option is equal to the closing market price of Company common stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of non-qualified options granted under the SI Plan is ten years and two days and the options generally vest in 331/3% increments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The maximum term of non-qualified options granted under the ESA Plan and NED Plan is 11 years and the options generally vest 10% each year, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Our Stock Plans include a Stock Option Restoration Program feature (the "SORP") that allows, on the first trading day of August, a holder to pay the exercise price on vested in-the-money options by surrendering common stock of the Company that has been owned for at
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
least six months. This feature also permits a holder exercising an option to be granted new options in an amount equal to the number of common shares used to satisfy both the exercise price and withholding taxes due upon exercise. New options are granted with an expiration date equal to that of the original option and vest six months after the grant date. The SORP results in a net issuance of shares of common stock and fewer stock options outstanding. We receive a current income tax benefit for stock option exercises.
Nonvested stock awards are valued on the date of grant, have no purchase price and generally vest over four years in 331/3% increments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The Company also issues nonvested stock awards to our financial advisors (our sales force) who are considered independent contractors. These awards have the same terms as awards issued to employees; however, changes in the Company's share price result in variable compensation expense over the vesting period. Under the Stock Plans, nonvested shares are forfeited upon the termination of employment with or service to the Company, as applicable, or service on the Board of Directors, dependent upon the circumstances of termination. Except for restrictions placed on the transferability of nonvested stock, holders of nonvested stock have full stockholders' rights during the term of restriction, including voting rights and the rights to receive cash dividends.
A summary of stock option activity and related information for the year ended December 31, 2008 follows:
| Options | Weighted average exercise price | Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 | 2,645,666 | $ | 21.58 | 2.10 | ||||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||
Exercised | (503,907) | 15.97 | ||||||||||
Granted in restoration | 46,715 | 33.91 | ||||||||||
Exercised in restoration | (55,755) | 26.75 | ||||||||||
Terminated/Canceled | (110,875) | 16.24 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 | 2,021,844 | $ | 23.44 | 1.40 | ||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 | 1,975,129 | $ | 23.20 | 1.38 | ||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options and exercisable options as of December 31, 2008 was $126 thousand. The total intrinsic value (on date of exercise) of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $9.4 million, $31.9 million and $8.7 million, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized was $3.3 million, $11.6 million and $3.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
A summary of stock option activity and related information for the year ended December 31, 2011 is presented in the table below. All options outstanding expire prior to December 31, 2013.
| Options | Weighted average exercise price | Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | 298,295 | $ | 29.98 | 0.69 | |||||
Granted | — | — | |||||||
Exercised | (165,721) | 30.65 | |||||||
Terminated/Canceled | (104,979) | 29.26 | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 | 27,595 | $ | 28.64 | 0.62 | |||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2011 | 27,595 | $ | 28.64 | 0.62 | |||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options and exercisable options as of December 31, 2011 was $42 thousand. The total intrinsic value (on date of exercise) of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $1.4 million, $2.0 million and $7.3 million, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized was $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
SORP options with vesting periods of six months were the only options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006.2009. There were no options granted in 2010 or 2011. Compensation expense related to options issued under the SORP of $217 thousand, $19$9 thousand and $157$90 thousand was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $5.47, $2.76 and $2.94, respectively.2009 was $8.68. The grant date fair value of options granted have beenwas calculated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with assumptions as follows:
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dividend yield | 2.24% | 2.70% | 2.80% | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 2.05% | 4.57% | 4.92% | ||||||
Expected volatility | 32.10% | 24.50% | 22.50% | ||||||
Expected life (in years) | 1.89 | 1.21 | 2.09 |
Dividend yield | 2.71% | ||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.88% | ||
Expected volatility | 64.90% | ||
Expected life (in years) | 1.79 |
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
A summary of nonvested share activity and related fair value for the year ended December 31, 20082011 follows:
| Nonvested Stock Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonvested at December 31, 2007 | 3,426,921 | $ | 24.02 | |||
Granted | 1,565,553 | 27.95 | ||||
Vested | (1,378,985) | 23.51 | ||||
Forfeited | (50,891) | 25.71 | ||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 | 3,562,598 | $ | 25.92 | |||
| Nonvested Stock Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonvested at December 31, 2010 | 4,697,209 | $ | 27.86 | |||
Granted | 1,632,699 | 36.19 | ||||
Vested | (1,427,409) | 24.83 | ||||
Forfeited | (34,482) | 30.42 | ||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2011 | 4,868,017 | $ | 31.52 | |||
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, compensation expense related to nonvested stock totaled $29.0$46.5 million, $23.7$40.3 million and $21.7$30.5 million, respectively. In 2008,2009, we also recognized $795compensation expense of $400 thousand related to nonvested stock whichthat was immediately vested underfor employees in connection with the voluntary separation program, discusseddivestiture of our investment in Note 7. ACF. These costs are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.
The related income tax benefit was $10.5$17.1 million, $8.6$14.9 million and $7.9$11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively, which may be recognized upon vesting. As of December 31, 2008,2011, the remaining unamortized expense of $62.3$101.9 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.52.3 years.
The total fair value of shares vested (at vest date) during the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009 was $40.0$52.5 million, $21.0$46.5 million and $16.9$23.3 million, respectively. The Company permits employees the right to tender a portion of their vested shares to the Company to satisfy the minimum tax withholding obligations of the Company with respect to vesting of the shares. During 2009,2012, we expect to repurchase approximately 374,000575 thousand shares from employees who elect to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings.
For nonvested stock awards granted prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company will continue to recognize compensation expense over the contractual vesting period. Had compensation
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
expense for nonvested stock awards issued prior to January 1, 2006 been determined based on the date a participant first becomes eligible for retirement, the Company's net income would have been increased by $372 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008, decreased by $45 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2007 and increased by $280 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006.
14. Uniform Net Capital Rule Requirements
Three of our subsidiaries, Waddell & Reed, Inc. ("W&R"), Legend Equities Corporation ("LEC"), and Ivy Funds Distributor, Inc. ("IFDI") are registered broker/dealers and members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Broker/dealers are subject to the SEC's Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1), which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital and requires that the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital, both as defined, shall not exceed 15.0 to 1.0. The primary difference between net capital and stockholders' equity is the non-allowable assets that are excluded from net capital.
A broker/dealer may elect not to be subject to the Aggregate Indebtedness Standard of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of Rule 15c3-1, in which case net capital must exceed the greater of $250 thousand or 2% of aggregate debit items computed in accordance with the Formula for Determination of Reserve Requirements for broker/dealers. W&R made this election during the current year and thus is not subject to the aggregate indebtedness ratio as of December 31, 2008.2011 or 2010.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Net capital and aggregated indebtedness information for our broker/dealer subsidiaries is presented in the following table as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007 (in thousands):2010:
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W&R | LEC | IFDI | W&R | LEC | IFDI | ||||||||||||
Net capital | $ | 7,494 | 2,148 | 25,108 | $ | 41,187 | 2,136 | 12,328 | ||||||||||
Required capital | 250 | 172 | 1,298 | 13,117 | 173 | 1,333 | ||||||||||||
Excess of required capital | $ | 7,244 | 1,976 | 23,810 | $ | 28,070 | 1,963 | 10,995 | ||||||||||
Ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital | Not applicable | 1.20 to 1.0 | 0.78 to 1.0 | 4.78 to 1.0 | 1.22 to 1.0 | 1.62 to 1.0 | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| W&R | LEC | IFDI | W&R | LEC | IFDI | ||||||||||||
Net capital | $ | 34,524 | 1,654 | 45,579 | 39,563 | 2,547 | 38,663 | |||||||||||
Required capital | 250 | 251 | 2,353 | 250 | 185 | 2,425 | ||||||||||||
Excess of required capital | $ | 34,274 | 1,403 | 43,226 | 39,313 | 2,362 | 36,238 | |||||||||||
Ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital | Not applicable | 2.28 to 1.0 | 0.77 to 1.0 | Not applicable | 1.09 to 1.0 | 0.94 to 1.0 |
15. Rental Expense and Lease Commitments
We lease our home office buildings, certain sales and other office space and equipment under long-term operating leases. Rent expense was $20.1$22.6 million, $18.6$23.0 million and $18.3$22.0 million, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):follows:
2009 | $ | 17,703 | |
2010 | 14,889 | ||
2011 | 12,326 | ||
2012 | 10,106 | ||
2013 | 5,704 | ||
Thereafter | 11,311 | ||
$ | 72,039 | ||
Year | Commitments | ||
---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||
2012 | $ | 20,662 | |
2013 | 17,097 | ||
2014 | 12,921 | ||
2015 | 9,274 | ||
2016 | 6,316 | ||
Thereafter | 27,543 | ||
$ | 93,813 | ||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
New leases are expected to be executed as existing leases expire. Thus, future minimum lease commitments are not expected to be lessmaterially different than those in 2008.2011.
16. Related Party Transactions
We earn investment management feesfee revenues from the Funds for which we also act as an investment adviser, pursuant to an investment management agreement with each Fund. In addition, we have agreements with the Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, pursuant to which distribution and service fees are collected from the Funds for distribution of mutual fund shares, for costs such as advertising and commissions paid to broker/dealers, and for providing ongoing services to shareholders of the Funds and/or maintaining shareholder accounts. We also earn service fee revenues by providing various services to the Funds and their shareholders pursuant to a shareholder servicing agreement with each Fund (except the Ivy Funds VIP) and an accounting service
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
agreement with each Fund. Certain of our officers and directors are also officers directors and/or trustees for the various Funds for which we act as an investment adviser. These agreements are approved or renewed on an annual basis by each Fund's board of directors/trustees, including a majority of the disinterested members. Funds and separate accounts receivable includes amounts due from the Funds for aforementioned services.
17. Litigation and Regulatory Settlements
SEC/New York Attorney General/Kansas Securities Commission
During 2006, we recorded a charge of $55.0 million related to settlement with the SEC, the New York Attorney General and the Kansas Securities Commission regarding market timing allegations, $12 million of which represented non-deductible penalties. The charge is included in general and administrative expenses.
Williams Excessive Fee Litigation
On May 30, 2006, the investment advisor and underwriter subsidiaries of the Company for the Ivy Funds were dismissed from the case with prejudice. On September 25, 2006, the remainder of this case was dismissed with prejudice. The negotiations and discussions leading up to, and the terms of, the dismissal are confidential.
18. Contingencies
The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and claims incident to the normal conduct of business, which may include proceedings that are specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices within the industries in which we operate. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and on the results of operations in a particular quarter or year.
Michael E. Taylor, Kenneth B. Young, individuals, on behalf of themselves individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive; Case No. 09-CV-2909 DMS WVG; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
In this action filed December 28, 2009, the Company was sued in an individual action, class action and Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") nationwide collective action by two former advisors asserting misclassification of financial advisors as independent contractors instead of employees. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a purported class of Waddell & Reed, Inc. financial advisors, assert claims under the FLSA for minimum wages and overtime wages, and under California Labor Code Statutes for timely payment of wages, minimum wages, overtime compensation, meal periods, reimbursement of losses and business expenses and itemized wage statements and a claim for Unfair Business Practices under §17200 of the California Business & Professions Code. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief and monetary damages.
Plaintiffs moved for conditional collective action certification under the FLSA. The Company opposed this motion and additionally moved for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' individual FLSA claims. The Court issued an order on January 3, 2012 granting the Company's summary judgment motions, holding that Plaintiffs' individual FLSA claims fail as a matter of law, and denying Plaintiffs' motion for conditional collective action certification under the FLSA as moot. This ruling effectively removes all nationwide FLSA claims from the case.
Plaintiffs intend to continue to pursue the California claims and may seek to amend their complaint to attempt to revive certain FLSA claims. An adverse determination in this matter could have a material adverse impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend plaintiffs' claims.
At this stage in this litigation, based upon the information currently available to the Company, the Company is not able to determine that an unfavorable outcome is remote, reasonably possible, or probable, and the Company has determined that it cannot reasonably estimate either the amount or the range of possible losses that would result if plaintiffs were to prevail, therefore, the Company has not made any accruals with respect to this matter in its consolidated financial statements.
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009
19.18. Selected Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
| Quarter | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||
2008 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 234,069 | 252,783 | 241,224 | 191,044 | |||||||||
Net income | 28,341 | 35,187 | 33,365 | (730) (1) | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.41 | (0.01) | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.40 | (0.01) |
| Quarter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2011 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 296,574 | 309,945 | 297,749 | 290,909 | ||||||||
Net income | 45,633 | 49,970 | 39,834 | 40,022 | |||||||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.47 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.47 |
| Quarter | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 189,499 | 201,286 | 210,652 | 236,117 | |||||||||
Net income | 28,727 | 29,706 | 31,967 | 35,097 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.43 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.42 |
| Quarter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2010 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 251,614 | 257,219 | 254,807 | 281,245 | ||||||||
Net income | 35,909 | 34,152 | 40,533 | 46,365 | |||||||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.54 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.54 |
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. | ||
4.1 | Specimen of Class A Common Stock Certificate, par value $0.01 per share. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, File No. 333-43687, on February 27, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.2 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., as filed on April 9, 2009 with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 333-43687, on April 10, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.3 | Rights Agreement, dated as of April | ||
4.4 | Indenture, dated as of January 18, 2001, by and between Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. Filed as Exhibit 4.1(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13913, on February 5, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
4.5 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 18, 2001 by and between Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, including the form of the 7.50% notes due January 2006 as Exhibit A. Filed as Exhibits 4.1(b) and 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. | ||
4.6 | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2006, between Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to JP Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee, and the form of the Global Note for the Company's 5.60% Notes due 2011 as Exhibit A. Filed as Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. |
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.Index to Exhibits
4.7 | ||
Form of Indenture to be used in connection with the issuance of the Subordinated Debt Securities. Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Form S-3/A, File No. 333-43682, on September 7, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
4.8 | Form of Indenture to be used in connection with the Senior Debt Securities. Filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Form S-3ASR, File No. 333-179111, on January 20, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.1 | General Agent Contract, dated as of October 20, 2000, by and among Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Waddell & Reed, Inc. and its affiliated insurance companies. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-13913, for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.2 | Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2008, by and among Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Waddell & Reed, Inc. and its affiliated insurance companies. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.3 | Fund Participation Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2000, by and among Nationwide Life Insurance Company and/or Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company, Waddell & Reed Services Company and Waddell & Reed, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-13913, for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.4 | Fund Participation Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2003, by and among Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Waddell & Reed, Inc. and Ivy Funds VIP. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.5 | Variable Products Distribution Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2003, by and among Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Securian Financial Services, Inc. and Waddell & Reed, Inc. and its affiliated insurance companies. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
10.6 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.7 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.* | ||
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Executive Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.* | |||
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.* | |||
10.10 | Credit Agreement, dated August 31, 2010, by and among Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Bank of America Securities LLC as Lead Arranger and Book Manager, UMB Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Nova Scotia as Co-Syndication Agents, and Citibank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13913, on September 7, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference. |
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.Index to Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
Fixed Rate Promissory Note for Multiple Loans, dated as of August 15, 2000, by and between Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and Chase Manhattan Bank. Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-13913, for the year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | |||
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.* | |||
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 2003 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 333-43687, on April 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.* | |||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.Index to Exhibits
Administrative Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2001, by and among W&R Insurance Agency, Inc., Waddell & Reed, Inc., BISYS Insurance Services, Inc. and Underwriters Equity Corp. Filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference. | |||
Consulting Agreement, dated May 25, 2005, by and between Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. and Keith A. Tucker. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 333-43687, on May | |||
Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement, dated December 14, 2001, by and between Henry J. Herrmann and Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
10.22 | First Amendment to Change in Control Employment Agreement, dated December 17, 2008, by and between Henry J. Herrmann and Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.Index to Exhibits
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards | |||
10.25 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.26 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 333-43687, for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference * | ||
10.27 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-13913, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.28 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.* | ||
10.29 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards to Non-Employee Directors pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.30 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards to Non-Employee Directors pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.31 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Executive Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-13913, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.32 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
10.33 | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for awards pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 333-43687, for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
Portfolio Managers Revenue Sharing Schedule — Large Cap Growth.* | |||
10.37 | Form of Indemnification Agreement. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13913, on November 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.* | ||
10.38 | 2011 Performance Goals established pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 2003 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. | ||
2012 Performance Goals established pursuant to the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. 2003 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-13913, on February 16, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.* | |||
10.40 | Offer of Settlement. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 333-43687, on July 24, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
Assurance of Discontinuance. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 333-43687, on July 24, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. | |||
Stipulation for Consent Order. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 333-43687, on July 24, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference. | |||
11 | Statement regarding computation of per share earnings. | ||
12 | Statement re computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges. |
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.Index to Exhibits
21 | |||
Subsidiaries of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. | |||
23 | Consent of KPMG LLP. | ||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. | ||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | ||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. | ||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | ||
---|---|---|---|
101 | Materials from the Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in detail. |