QuickLinks-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

(Mark One)  

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082010

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to                         .

Commission file number 0-16244



VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
 11-2989601
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Terminal Drive
Plainview, New York

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

11803
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code(516) 677-0200

Website:www.veeco.com

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

         Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes o    No ýo

         Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by references in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting companyo

         Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes    ý No

         The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the common stock on June 30, 200727, 2010 as reported on The Nasdaq National Market, was $643,829,373.$1,566,934,944. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

At February 26, 2009,22, 2011, the Registrant had 32,175,96140,616,024 outstanding shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

         Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 15, 200919, 2011 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Items 1, 3, 7 and 7A hereof, as well as within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "estimates," "plans," "intends,""intends" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:




        Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as the Company's current plans, estimates, and beliefs. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.


Item 1.    Business

The Company

        Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, "Veeco," the "Company" or "we") designs, manufactures and manufactures enabling solutions for customers in the high brightnessmarkets equipment to make light emitting diodediodes ("HB-LED"LEDs"), solar data storage, semiconductor, scientific researchpanels, hard-disk drives and industrial markets.other devices. We have leading technology positions in each of our three reportabletwo segments: LEDLight Emitting Diode ("LED") & Solar Process Equipment,and Data Storage Process Equipment, and Metrology.Storage.

        In our LED & Solar segment, we design and manufacture metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, and sources, and other types ofCopper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide ("CIGS") deposition systems such as web coaters, whichand thermal deposition sources that we sell to manufacturers of HB-LEDs,high brightness LEDs ("HB LED") and solar cells and telecommunications devices andpanels, as well as to universities and scientific research centers.customers.

        In our Data Storage segment, we design and manufacture ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing productssystems that are primarily used to create thin film magnetic heads ("TFMHs") that read and write data on hard disk drives.

        InWe support our Metrology segment, we designcustomers through product development, manufacturing, and manufacture atomic force microscopes ("AFMs")sales and service sites in the U.S., stylus profilers, and optical interferometers used to provide critical surface measurements in research and production environments. Our broad line of AFMs, scanning probe microscopes ("SPMs"), optical interferometers, and stylus profilers are used in universities, research facilities and scientific centers worldwide. In production environments such as semiconductor, data storageKorea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and other industries, our metrology instruments enable customers to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality.locations.

        Veeco Instruments was organized as a Delaware corporation in 1989.

Our Strategy

        Our strategy for growth and improved profitability focuses on the following key activities:

        We serve our worldwide customers through our global sales and service organization located throughout the United States, Europe, Japan, and Asia Pacific. At December 31, 2008, we had 1,195 employees, with manufacturing, research and development, and engineering facilities located in New York, Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Massachusetts and New Jersey.

Business Overview and Industry Trends

        General Introduction:    Our thin film deposition, etch measurement and other technologies are applicable to the creation of a broad range of microelectronic components, including HB-LEDs,HB LEDs, solar cells, thin film magnetic heads and compound semiconductor devices. Our customers who manufacture these


devices continue to invest in new technology equipment in order to advance their next generation products and deliver more efficient and cost effective technology solutions.

        Starting atFollowing the end of 2008global recession, Veeco experienced a rapid improvement in business conditions in late 2009 and continuing through the beginninginto 2010. The combination of 2009, the global economic downturn, constrained financing environment and a slowdownan improvement in capital spending by our global customers as well as our focus on equipment is impacting most of ourhigh-growth end markets, particularly HB LED, and customers. While it is currently unclear how long this overall negative business climate will continue, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on long-term technology growth opportunities and are preparingsuccessful new product introduction enabled the Company to maximize positive multi-year industry trends. A particular strategic focus for Veeco has been to allocate additional research and development spending towards end markets that we believe offer significantbenefit from accelerated growth opportunities, such as the LED and solar markets, as contrasted with traditional, maturing markets such as data storage and semiconductor.in 2010.

        The following is a review of our threetwo reportable segments and the multi-year technology trends that impact each.


        LED & Solar Business Overview and Trends:    We are a leading supplier of process equipment solutions used to create a broad range of compound semiconductor-based devices such as high-brightnessHB LEDs and solar cells and telecommunications devices. We are the only supplier of both MOCVD and MBE systems, the two key epitaxial deposition technologies used for these applications.cells. MOCVD and MBE technologies are used to grow compound semiconductor materials (such as GaAs (gallium arsenide), GaN (gallium nitride), As/P (arsenic phosphide) and InP (indium phosphide)) at the atomic scale. Epitaxy is the critical first step in compound semiconductor wafer fabrication and is considered to be the highest value added process, ultimately determining device functionality and performance.

        Strategies Unlimited, an LED industry research organization, forecasts that the market for HB-LEDs will grow from $4.2 billion in 2007 to over $11.0 billion in 2012, for a compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") of 20%. We believe that the HB-LEDHB LED market, while cyclical, represents a high-growth opportunity for us due to the expanding applications for HB-LEDs,HB LEDs, such as backlighting for large screen flat panel TVs (LCD—liquid crystal displays), laptop computers, automotive applications, and general illumination. In 2009 and 2010 the LED industry experienced significant growth as LEDs penetrated laptop and television backlighting applications. Strategies Unlimited, an LED industry research organization, forecasted in its June 2010 report that growth in these applications will continue, resulting in a compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") exceeding 80% from 2009 through 2014. LEDs are also starting to experience increased adoption for general lighting, with Strategies Unlimited forecasting a CAGR of 45.4% during that same time period. Overall, the market for HB LEDs is expected to grow from $5.4 billion in 2009 to $19.6 billion in 2014, for a CAGR of 29.5%.

        In order to gain market share in light ofand capitalize on this growth opportunity, we have introducedaccelerated our R&D investments to introduce several generations of MOCVD tools, most recently our TurboDisc® K-Series™ and MaxBright™ MOCVD systems. By introducing new systems, we are focused on delivering better uniformity and repeatability, which helps our customers to make higher-brightness HB-LEDsHB LEDs of consistent quality.quality, ultimately with the goal to deliver more, high quality LEDs at a lower manufacturing cost. We also intend to continue to invest heavily in research and development in order to deliver more advanced MOCVD solutions to our customers.

A related application for us is in the solar market. We currently sell ourmarket, since the same MOCVD toolstool that is critical to manufacturers ofthe LED manufacturing process can also be used to manufacture high-efficiency triple junction solar cells as well our thermal deposition sourcescells. The Company currently sells a small number of MOCVD systems each year for this concentrator solar (CPV) application and is also beginning to manufacturers of CIGS (copper, indium, gallium, selenide)sell tools to an emerging growth market for power devices.

        Veeco has also identified the thin film solar cells. The solar industry is emergingcell market as aoffering significant new market opportunity for us.growth opportunities. The global energy dilemma is resulting inhas triggered a significant amount of new research and spending intoin solar technologies as an alternative energy solution, since it is non-polluting and has the potential to supply the world with high energy efficiency at low cost. While many of today's solar panels are based upon older silicon technologies, thin film CIGS offerssolar cells offer the potential for lower manufacturing costs, hasand have the highest efficiency of the thin film technologies and Panel Photovoltaic ("PV") devices can be manufactured on rigid or flexible substrates.technologies. According to Bank of America, thin film photovoltaic technologies will grow from lessan October 2010 report released by Greentech Media Research ("GTM"), CIGS module manufacturing costs are projected to be lower than 5% of totalthose associated with silicon wafer-based modules. CIGS solar panels have broad-based end market applications for solar farms, commercial and residential rooftops, building integrated and building applied PV solar panel production in 2005 to over 20% in 2010.(BIPV/BAPV) and portable devices.

        Since PV manufacturers often build their own equipment, there is a market opportunity emerging for equipment suppliers such as Veeco. To capitalizeIn its October 2010 report, GTM forecasted that CIGS global module capacity will have a CAGR of 49% from 2010 to 2013 with capacity reaching 3.4GW in 2013. We plan to expand our deposition product line to create "best of breed" deposition systems that can deposit materials on this opportunity, in 2008 we purchased Mill Lane Engineering, a manufacturerflexible (stainless steel) or rigid (glass) substrates. Today Veeco supplies thermal evaporation components to over 50% of web coating technology,CIGS companies worldwide and has begun to make flexiblepenetrate CIGS solar cells.customers with our deposition system solutions. We are increasingshipping our FastFlex Web Coating Systems for the front and back contact and absorber layer CIGS deposition. These new systems are capable of processing up to 1m web widths that will enable PV manufacturers to continue lowering their cost of ownership. We intend to increase our research and development spending in CIGS technology for both the rigid and flexible substrate market since we believe it offers a significant growth opportunity. According to aopportunity over the next several years.



May 2008 report presented by the National Renewable Energy Labs ("NREL"), future CIGS PV panels are projected to be "the most competitive thin film technology" based upon module efficiency and relative cost basis. CIGS solar panels have broad-based end market applications for solar farms, integrated building PV, rooftop grids and portable devices.

        Our LED & Solar segment has experienced high revenue growth in the last three years and now represents our largest segment.

        Data Storage Business Overview and Trends:    Worldwide storage demand continues to increase, driven by proliferation of laptop and netbook PC's, intelligent internet storage, e-mail, external storage devices, and new consumer applications (e.g. digital video recorders) now reaching higher volume. While much has been written about the competition hard disk drives ("HDDs") face from flash memory, we believe that HDDs will continue to provide the best value for mass storage and will remain at the forefront of large capacity storage applications. In fact, the use of disk drives in many types of consumer applications has resulted in growth in the number of hard drive units shipped, which is expected to continue. According to data storage research firm TrendFocus's 2008TrendFocus' February 2011 report, consumer electronic applications of HDDs are forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 12.2%9.4% from 20072010 to 2012.2015.

        While technology change continues in data storage, the industry is goinghas gone through a period of maturation, including vertical integration and consolidation, which has led to decreased capital investment. Asconsolidation. Veeco is focused on remaining a result of this consolidation and evolving customer landscape, we have taken actions to right-size our data storage businesses and product lines. We are refocusing our research and development efforts, discontinued several product lines, and are consolidating facilities. We continue to maintain our commitmentvalued equipment supplier to the data storage industry and believe we areis well-aligned to customer'sthe industry's technology requirements and demand for lower cost of ownership tools.

        Metrology Business Overview Veeco has restructured and Industry Trends:    Our Metrology segment sellsrefocused its productsData Storage business around core technologies where we have a leadership position and utilize a flexible manufacturing strategy. A recovery in capital spending by our key Data Storage customers, combined with the successful introduction of several new deposition tools to advance areal density technologies, enabled Veeco to report a broad range of industry and research customers. This businessstrong growth year in 2010. Going forward, Veeco's product development team has often tracked the growth of the economy and Gross Domestic Product,begun to identify non-hard drive market applications (such as instruments are used in a wide range of industrial applications. A meaningful trend in the research industry is the growth in nanotechnology investment occurring at the scientific and university level. Nanotechnology is the ability to design and control the structure of an object at all lengths from the atom up to the macro scale. Nanoscience and nanotechnology have received significant funding from the U.S. government and other countries, and have impacted many industries, including life sciences, data storage, semiconductor, telecommunications, and materials sciences. We have developed specific metrology instruments aligned to these applications. In atomic force microscopy, we are developing new tools for university and government research in such areas as security, energy and biotechnology. We also believe that long-term growth opportunities existLED) for our Metrology instruments in industrial applications, such as precision manufacturing, clean energy (LED and Solar), and microelectonics. We have launched new three-dimensional ("3D") advanced optical profilers used for surface topography, roughness and defect characterization and new high-precision 2D and 3D surface stylus profilers for process development and yield management.

        Many of our tools are sold to semiconductor and data storage customers who use metrology tools in their wafer fabrication facilities to detect process deviations as early in the manufacturing process as possible. We have sold over 450 automated AFM systems used in-line by manufacturers of semiconductor chips and data storage TFMHs in their fabrication facilities. While the outlook for capital expenditures by semiconductor manufacturers is currently not favorable, we believe that Veeco offers unique metrology technology solutions for our customers.


key Data Storage technologies.

Our Products

        We have threetwo business segments, LED & Solar Process Equipment,and Data Storage Process Equipment, and Metrology.Storage. Net sales for these business segments is shown below forare illustrated in the years indicated:following table:

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

LED & Solar Process Equipment

 $165.8 $115.9 $94.2 
 

% of net sales

  37.4% 28.8% 21.4%

Data Storage Process Equipment

 $149.1 $136.1 $174.7 
 

% of net sales

  33.7% 33.8% 39.6%

Metrology

 $127.9 $150.5 $172.1 
 

% of net sales

  28.9% 37.4% 39.0%

Total net sales

 $442.8 $402.5 $441.0 

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

LED & Solar

 $797.9 $205.2 $165.8 
 

% of net sales

  85.5% 72.7% 52.7%

Data Storage

 $135.3 $77.2 $149.1 
 

% of net sales

  14.5% 27.3% 47.3%

Total net sales

 $933.2 $282.4 $314.9 

        See Note 911 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our reportable segments and sales by geographic location.

LED & Solar Process Equipment

        Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition Systems:    We are one of the world's leading suppliers of MOCVD technology. MOCVD production systems grow gallium nitride-basedare used to make GaN-based devices (green and blue HB-LEDs)HB LEDs) and arsenic phosphide-basedAs/P-based devices (red, orange, and yellow HB-LEDs)HB LEDs), which are used today in television and laptop backlighting, general illumination, large area signage, mobile device backlighting,specialty illumination and specialty illumination.many other applications. Our As/P MOCVD Systems also are used to make high-efficiency concentrator solar cells.

        Molecular Beam Epitaxy Systems:    MBE is the process of precisely depositing epitaxially aligned atomically thin crystal layers, or epilayers, of elemental materials onto a substrate in an ultra-high vacuum environment. For many compound semiconductors, MBE is the critical first step of the fabrication process, ultimately determining device functionality and performance. We provide a broad



array of MBE components and systems for research and production applications and in 2007, introduced a new line of MBE componentsthermal evaporation sources for the CIGS solar industry.

        Web and Glass Coaters for FlexibleThin Film Solar Cells:    In the second quarter of 2008 we purchased Mill Lane Engineering,We are a manufacturer of web deposition equipment used to make CIGS solar cells. Our advanced webWe have expanded our product line to include "best of breed" solutions that perform the critical CIGS deposition platform,steps on flexible and rigid (glass) substrates. We believe that our FastFlex™, was introduced in September 2008 and offersFastLine™ systems offer high throughput and excellent performance for flexible thin film solar cell production, contributing to a lower cost of ownership due to its high quantity of deposition zones in a compact footprint.for our customers.

Data Storage Process Equipment

        Ion Beam Deposition ("IBD") Systems:    Our NEXUS® IBD systems utilize ion beam technology to deposit precise layers of thin films and may be included on our cluster system platform to allow either parallel or sequential etch/deposition processes. IBD systems deposit high purity thin film layers and provide maximum uniformity and repeatability. In addition to IBD systems, we provide a broad array of ion beam sources.

        Ion Beam Etch ("IBE") Systems:    We develop and produceOur NEXUS IBE systems which etch precise, complex features for use primarily by data storage and telecommunications device manufacturers in the fabrication of discrete and integrated microelectronic devices.


        Physical Vapor Deposition ("PVD") Systems:    Our NEXUS PVD systems offer manufacturers a highly flexible deposition platform for developing next-generation data storage and compound semiconductor applications.

        Diamond-Like Carbon ("DLC") Deposition Systems:    Our DLC deposition systems deposit protective coatings on advanced TFMHs.

        Chemical Vapor Deposition ("CVD") Systems:    Our NEXUS CVD systems, introduced to the market in 2008, deposit conformal films for advanced TFMH applications.

        Precision Lapping, Slicing, and Dicing Systems:    Our Optium® Slider process equipment products generally are used in "back-end" applications in a data storage fab where TFMHs or "sliders" are fabricated. This equipment includes lapping tools, which enable precise material removal within three nanometers, which is necessary for next generation TFMHs. We also manufacture instruments that slice and dice wafers into rowbars and TFMHs.

Metrology

        Our surface metrology product line includes atomic force/scanning probe microscopes, optical metrology tools, and stylus profilers for a wide range of applications in research and industry.

        Atomic Force/Scanning Probe Microscopes:    We have the world's broadest line of research AFMs and SPMs. Our NanoScope® and Dimension® products are widely used by leading nanotechnology research centers worldwide. Veeco was a pioneer of AFM technology, and we continue to develop new products for production and research applications. In 2008, Veeco saw increased usage of several new AFM/SPM products including our BioScope II, Innova and others. We recently introduced our newest generation research AFM platform, the Dimension Icon, a high-performance, easy-to-use AFM which was engineered from the ground up to incorporate all of our latest AFM modes and techniques. We also produce a broad range of automated AFM/SPM products designed for data storage, semiconductor and research and other industrial applications. Our InSight Automated AFM is the only metrology system available with the accuracy and precision required for non-destructive, high resolution 3D measurements of critical 45nm and 32nm semiconductor features, with the speed to qualify as a true fab tool.

        The atomic force microscope "feels" the sample surface directly using a probe consisting of a very sharp tip or probe mounted on a microscopic spring arm (a cantilever). The interaction of the probe with the surface is detected by measuring deflections of the cantilever with an optical beam system. AFMs, which permit non-destructive measurements and resolution at the molecular level, can directly measure both lateral and vertical shapes with nanometer resolution and with direct 3D capability. In addition to topography, AFMs can also directly measure the magnetic field (such as magnetic bits on a hard disk); electric field; hardness (such as thin film integrity); electric charge density (such as dopant concentrations in semiconductors); temperature (such as temperature distribution in disk drive recording head elements); and various chemical properties (such as the difference in binding preference among biological molecules). AFMs make these measurements on almost any surface; in air, vacuum or under fluids; and with minimal sample preparation.

        Stylus Profilers:    Stylus profilers are used to produce cross-sectional representations and/or quantitative measurements, which are displayed on a video monitor. Our Dektak® stylus profiler systems utilize a precision translation stage which creates relative motion between the sample and a diamond tipped stylus. As the sample moves under the stylus, surface variations cause vertical translation of the stylus, which is tracked and measured. Stylus profilers are widely used for height, width, pitch, and roughness measurements of features on semiconductor devices, magnetic and optical storage media (such as hard drives), flat panel displays, and hybrid circuits. Stylus profilers are often used for direct contact measurements and to measure larger feature sizes than our AFMs. We believe



that our stylus profiler products are recognized for their accuracy, repeatability, ease of use, and technology features, and are designed to meet a range of industry specifications and customer requirements.

        Optical/Stylus Metrology (Interferometry) Products:    Substantially all of our optical metrology instruments are designed to make non-contact surface measurements using interferometry technology. This process involves the use of either white light or laser sources to measure surface roughness and shape by creating interference patterns from the optical path difference between the test surface and a reference surface. Using a combination of phase shifting interferometry and vertical scanning interferometry, these instruments are designed to rapidly and precisely measure and characterize a range of surface sizes and shapes. Our major optical products include the Wyko® NT™ family and SP3000™ and the HD-Series™ optical profilers. The NT family product line measures surface roughness, heights, and shapes. The HD-Series instruments are a line of microstructure measurement equipment used by manufacturers of mass memory components including manufacturers of TFMHs, disks, drives, and suspensions. HD-Series instruments are used for research and development, process control and improvement, incoming parts inspection, final parts inspection, and field failure analysis.

Service and Sales

        We sell our products and services worldwide through various strategically located sales and service facilities in the U.S., Europe and Asia Pacific, and Japan, and we believe that our customer service organization is a significant factor in our success. We provide service and support on a warranty, service contract or an individual service-call basis. We also offer enhanced warranty coverage and services, including preventative maintenance plans, on-call and on-site service plans and other comprehensive service arrangements, product and application training, consultation services, and a 24-hour hotline service for certain products. We believe that offering 24 hour, 7 day per week worldwidetimely support creates stronger relationships with customers and provides us with a significant competitive advantage. Revenues from the sale of parts, service and support represented approximately 19%7%, 21%,16% and 20%21% of our net sales for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. Parts sales represented approximately 14%5%, 17%,9% and 17%14% of our net sales for those periods,years, respectively, and service and support sales were 5%2%, 4%,7% and 3%7%, respectively.


Customers

        We sell our products to many of the world's major HB-LED,HB LED, solar data storage and semiconductorhard drive manufacturers andas well as to customers in other industries, research centers, and universities. We rely on certain principal customers for a significant portion of our sales. Sales to LG Innotek Co. Ltd. and Seoul OptoDevice Co. Ltd. each accounted for more than 10% of Veeco's total net sales includingin 2010, LG Innotek Co. Ltd. and Seagate Technology, Inc. Saleseach accounted more than 10% of Veeco's total net sales in 2009 and sales to Seagate Technology, Inc. accounted for 17%10% or more of Veeco's total net sales in 2008. If any principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic difficulties, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Research and Development

        We believe that continued and timely development of new products and enhancements to existing products are necessary to maintain our competitive position. We work collaboratively with our customers to help ensure our technology and product roadmaps are aligned with customer requirements. Our research and development programs are organized by product line and new or improved products have been introduced into each of our product lines in each of the past three years.

        Our research and development expenses were approximately $60.4$71.4 million, $61.2$43.5 million and $61.9$39.6 million, or approximately 13.6%8%, 15.2%,15% and 14.0%13% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. These expenses consisted primarily of salaries, project material and other product development and enhancement costs.


Suppliers

        We currently outsource and plan to increase the outsourcing of, certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, and certain of our data storage process equipment systems. At present, wesystems, solar deposition systems and ion sources. We primarily rely primarily on twoseveral suppliers for the majoritymanufacturing of the manufacture of these MOCVD and data storage process equipment systems. We plan to maintain internal manufacturing capability for these systems at least until such time as we have qualified one or more alternate suppliers to perform this manufacturing. The failure of our present suppliersuppliers to meet itstheir contractual obligations under our supply arrangementarrangements and our inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and relationships with our customers.

        In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.

ManufacturingProduct Development, Marketing and Operations

        Our principal manufacturing activities, which consist principally of assembly,product development, integration, and test operations and assembly, are organized by product and take place at our facilities in Plainview and Clifton Park, New York; Santa Barbara and Camarillo, California; Tucson, Arizona; Ft. Collins, Colorado; Somerset, New Jersey; St. Paul, Minnesota; and Lowell, Massachusetts.

Product Organization

        Our sales, marketing, manufacturing and research and development functions are organized by product families. We believe that this organizational structure allows each product family manager to more closely monitor the products for which he is responsible, resulting in more efficient sales, marketing, manufacturing and research and development. We emphasize customer responsiveness, customer service, high-quality products and an interactive management style. By implementing these



management philosophies, we believe that we have increased our competitiveness and are well-positioned for future growth.

Backlog

        Our backlog declined from $173.5increased to $555.0 million atas of December 31, 2007 to $147.22010 from $377.3 million atas of December 31, 2008.2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $8.0$10.7 million, consisting of $18.7$12.5 million for order cancellations primarily from Asia Pacific MOCVD customersadjustments ($10.2 million is related to our Solar and $2.0MBE businesses) offset by $1.8 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation, partially offset by $12.7 million of backlog acquired in the Mill Lane acquisition.translation.

        Our backlog generally consists of product orders for which we received a firm purchase order, has been received and which are scheduled fora customer-confirmed shipment date within twelve months. We schedule production of our systems based on order backlogmonths and customer commitments. Because certain of our orders require products to be shipped in the same quarter in which the order is received, and because changes in delivery schedules, cancellations of orders and delays in shipment are possible, we do not believe that the level of backlog at any point in time is an accurate indicator of our future performance. For certain sales arrangements we require a deposit, for a portion of the sales price before shipment. As of December 31, 2008 we have deposits and advanced billings of $18.0 million. Due to changing business conditions and weak capital equipment spending by our customers, we may continue to experience cancellation and/or rescheduling of orders, particularly as the economic downturn has become more significant and wide ranging as credit availability has tightened and financial conditions have deteriorated. We expect 2009 to be a very difficult year for the Company as we continue to experience weak new order conditions and customers



foregoing capacity and technology investments. In addition, customers have delayed approximately $30.0 million of shipments originally scheduled for the first quarter of 2009 until later in the year.where required.

Competition

        In each of the markets that we serve, we face substantial competition from established competitors, some of which have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than us, as well as from smaller competitors. In addition, many of our products face competition from alternative technologies, some of which are more established than those used in our products. Significant factors for customer selection of metrology and process equipmentour tools include system performance, accuracy, repeatability, ease of use, reliability, cost of ownership and technical service and support. We believe that we are competitive based on the customer selection factors in each market we serve. None of our competitors compete with us across all of our product lines.

        We compete with process equipment manufacturers such as Aixtron, Anelva, Hitachi, Riber,Applied Materials, Centrotherm, Nippon Sanso, Oerlikon and Aixtron. We compete with metrology product manufacturers such as KLA-Tencor, Seiko, Hitachi, Zygo, Agilent, and a variety of small manufacturers.Riber.

Intellectual Property

        Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. Although we attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other measures, there can be no assurance that we will be able to protect our technology adequately or that competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently.

        We have patents and exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to patents owned by others covering certain of our products, which we believe provide us with a competitive advantage. We have a policy of seeking patents on inventions concerning new products and improvements as part of our ongoing research, development and manufacturing activities. We believe that there is no single patent or exclusive or non-exclusive license to patents owned by others whichthat is critical to our operations, and thatas the success of our business depends primarily on the technical expertise, innovation, customer satisfaction and experience of our employees.

        We also rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and propriety information. There can be no assurance that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. In addition, we cannot be certain that we will not be sued by third parties alleging that we have infringed their patents or other intellectual property rights. If any third party sues us, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Employees

        AtAs of December 31, 2008,2010, we had 1,195900 employees, of which there were 320192 in manufacturing and testing, 173109 in sales and marketing, 159153 in service, 5633 in product support, 332274 in engineering, research and development and 155139 in information technology, general administration and finance. In addition,



we also had 123 temporary employees, which support our variable cost strategy. The success of our future operations depends in large part on our ability to recruit and retain engineers, technicians and other highly-skilled professionals who are in considerable demand. We feel that we have adequate programs in place to attract, motivate and retain our employees, and weemployees. We plan to monitor industry practices to make sure that our compensation and employee benefits remain competitive. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining key personnel. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.


Available Information

        We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site ishttp://www.sec.gov.

Internet Address

        We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our website iswww.veeco.com. We provide a link on our website, under Investors—Financial Info—Financial—SEC Filings, through which investors can access our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports. These filings are posted to our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Risk Factors That May Impact Future Results

        In addition to the other information set forth herein, the following risk factors should be carefully considered by shareholders of and potential investors in the Company.

Our failure to successfully manage our outsourcing activities or failure of our outsourcing partners to perform as anticipated could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to realize the benefits of the increased MOCVD order volume.

        To better align our costs with market conditions, increase the percentage of variable costs relative to total costs and to increase productivity and operational efficiency, we have outsourced certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, data storage systems, solar deposition systems and ion sources. In addition, to supplement our current staffing and our planned hiring to meet the increased MOCVD order volume, we rely heavily on our outsourcing partners and utilize technical staffing firms and contractors to assist with certain aspects of MOCVD system installation at customer sites. In order to meet the substantial increase in MOCVD system orders, we are relying heavily on our outsourcing partners. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing may adversely affect our ability to satisfy the recent strong demand for our MOCVD equipment and to bring other new products to market. If our outsourcing partners do not perform successfully, our results of operations may be adversely affected and we could suffer damage to our reputation. Although we attempt to select reputable providers, it is possible that one or more of these providers could fail to perform as we expect. In addition, the expanded role of third party providers has required and will continue to require us to implement changes to our existing operations and adopt new procedures and processes for retaining and managing these providers in order to realize operational efficiencies, assure quality, and protect our intellectual property. If we do not effectively manage our outsourcing strategy or if third party providers do not perform as anticipated, we may not



realize the benefits of the increase in MOCVD order volume or gross margin or productivity improvements and we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs, manufacturing and/or installation interruptions or delays, inefficiencies in the structure and/or operation of our supply chain, loss of intellectual property rights, quality issues, increased product time-to-market and/or inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The reduction or elimination of foreign government subsidies and economic incentives may adversely affect the future order rate for our MOCVD equipment.

        The Chinese government has provided various incentives to encourage development of the LED industry, including subsidizing a significant portion of the purchase cost of MOCVD equipment. These subsidies have enabled and encouraged certain customers in this region to purchase more of our MOCVD equipment than these customers might have purchased without these subsidies. These subsidies are expected to decline over time and may end or be reduced at some point in the future. The reduction or elimination of these incentives may result in a reduction in future orders for our MOCVD equipment in this region which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        A related risk is that many customers are using the Chinese government subsidies, in addition to other incentives from the Chinese government, to build new manufacturing facilities or to expand existing manufacturing facilities. Delays in the start-up of these facilities, and other related issues pertaining to customer readiness, could adversely impact the timing of our revenue recognition and have other negative effects on our financial condition and operating results.

Manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect our ability to meet customer demand, while the failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        Our business depends on our ability to supply equipment, services and related products that meet the rapidly changing technical and volume requirements of our customers, which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from suppliers. Some key parts may be subject to long lead-times and/or obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by suppliers located in countries other than the United States. We may experience significant interruptions of our manufacturing operations, delays in our ability to deliver products or services, increased costs or customer order cancellations as a result of:

        In addition, our need to rapidly increase our business and manufacturing capacity to meet unanticipated increases in demand may be limited by working capital constraints of our suppliers and may exacerbate any interruptions in our manufacturing operations and supply chain and the associated effect on our working capital. Moreover, if actual demand for our products is different than expected,



we may purchase more/fewer parts than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing or expediting delivery of parts. The volatility of demand for capital equipment increases capital, technical and other risks for companies in the supply chain. Any or all of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers, some of whom are our sole source for particular components.

        We currently outsource certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, data storage systems, solar deposition systems and ion sources. We primarily rely on several suppliers for the manufacturing of these systems. We plan to maintain internal manufacturing capability for these systems at least until such time as we have qualified one or more alternate suppliers to perform this manufacturing. The failure of our present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under our supply arrangements and our inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with our customers.

        In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellation could result in decreased sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        Customer purchase orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, generally with limited or no penalties. Often, we have incurred expenses prior to such cancellation without adequate monetary compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $10.7 million, consisting of $12.5 million for order adjustments ($10.2 million is related to our Solar and MBE businesses), offset by $1.8 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation. With our current high backlog, a downturn in one or more of our served markets could result in a significant increase in cancellations and/or rescheduling.

        We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and future usage trends and other factors including the consideration of the amount of backlog we have on hand at any particular point in time. If our backlog is canceled or modified, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. In addition, we place orders with our suppliers based on our customers' orders to us. If our customers cancel their orders with us, we may not be able to cancel our orders with our suppliers and may be required to take a charge for these cancelled commitments to our suppliers. Any such charges could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Our sales to HB LED and data storage manufacturers are highly dependent on these manufacturers' sales for consumer electronics applications, which can experience significant volatility due to seasonal and other factors, which could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

        The demand for HB LEDs and hard disk drives is highly dependent on sales of consumer electronics, such as flat-panel televisions and computer monitors, computers, digital video recorders, camcorders, MP3/4 players and cell phones. Our sales to HB LED manufacturers are also highly dependent on end market adoption of LED technology into general illumination applications, including



residential, commercial and street lighting markets. Manufacturers of HB LEDs and hard disk drives are among our largest customers and have accounted for a substantial portion of our revenues for the past several years. Factors that could influence the levels of spending on consumer electronic products include consumer confidence, access to credit, volatility in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and healthcare costs and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our customers' products and, in turn, on our customers' demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if manufacturers of HB LEDs have overestimated their potential market share growth, we may experience cancellations of orders in backlog, postponement of customer deliveries, obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

        In addition, the demand for some of our customers' products can be even more volatile and unpredictable due to the possibility of competing technologies, such as flash memory as an alternative to hard disk drives. Should flash memory become cost competitive it may result in a rapid shift in demand from the hard disk drives made by our customers to alternative storage technologies. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand for our customers' products or rapid shifts in demand from our customers' products to alternative technologies could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

Negative worldwide economic conditions could result in a decrease in our net sales and an increase in our operating costs, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

        If the currentAs a global company with worldwide operations, we are subject to volatility and adverse consequences associated with worldwide economic downturns. In the event of a worldwide downturn, continues, many of our customers may delay or further reduce their purchases of our products and services. If the negative conditions in the global credit markets prevent our customers' access to credit, product orders in these channels may decrease which could result in lower revenue. Likewise, if our suppliers face challenges in obtaining credit, in selling their products or otherwise in operating their businesses, they may become unable to continue to offer the materials we use to manufacture our products. Our results of operations would be further adversely affected if we were to experience lower than anticipated order levels, cancellations of orders in backlog, postponement of customer deliveries, or pricing pressure as a result of thisa prolonged slowdown. Any negative effect on our earnings may affect our borrowing availability and potentially result in noncompliance with the restrictive covenants of our credit agreement.

        In addition, the current negative worldwide economic conditions and market instability make it increasingly difficult for us, our customers and our suppliers to accurately forecast future product demand, which could result in obsolete inventory. Alternatively, this forecasting difficulty could cause a shortage ofinventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products or materials used in our products, that could result in an inability to satisfy demand for our products and a loss of market share.no longer needed.

        Furthermore, we finance a portion of our sales through trade credit. In addition to ongoing credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition, we seek to mitigate our credit risk by obtaining deposits and/or letters of credit on certain of our sales arrangements. We could suffer significant losses if a customer whose accounts receivable we have not secured fails or is otherwise unable to pay us. A significant loss in collections on our accounts receivable would have a negative impact on our financial results.

We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business, including the need to obtain export licenses for certain of our shipments and political risks in the countries we operate.

        Approximately 90% of our 2010 net sales, 79% of our 2009 net sales and 58% of our 2008 net sales were generated from sales outside of the United States. We expect sales from non-U.S. markets to continue to represent a significant, and possibly increasing, portion of our sales in the future. Our



Ournon-U.S. sales and operations are subject to data storagerisks inherent in conducting business abroad, many of which are outside our control, including:

        Many of these challenges are present in China, which could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

        The demand for hard disk drives and HB-LEDs is highly dependent on sales of consumer electronics, such as computers, digital video recorders, camcorders, MP3/4 players, cell phones and flat panel televisions. Manufactures of hard disk drives and HB-LEDs are among our largest customers and have accounted for a substantial portionapproximately 30% of our revenues for the past several years. However, spending on consumer electronics has deteriorated significantlytotal 2010 revenues. These conditions in China and other foreign economies may continue to deteriorate in many countries and regions, including the United States, due to the poor global economic conditions. For example, factors that could influence the levels of spending on consumer electronic products include consumer confidence, access to credit, volatility in fuel and other energy costs, conditionsrecur again in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and healthcare costs and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factorsfuture, which could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our customers' products and,business. In addition, political instability, terrorism, acts of war or epidemics in turn, onregions where we operate may adversely affect or disrupt our customers' demand for our products and services and on our financial conditionbusiness and results of operations.

        InFurthermore, products which are either manufactured in the United States or based on U.S. technology are subject to the United States Export Administration Regulations ("EAR") when exported to and re-exported from international jurisdictions, in addition to the demand for somelocal jurisdiction's export regulations applicable to individual shipments. Currently, our MOCVD deposition systems and certain of our customers'other products are controlled for export under the EAR. Licenses or proper license exceptions may be required for the shipment of our products to certain countries. For example, shipment of our MOCVD systems to China and certain other countries generally requires a U.S. export license. Obtaining an export license requires cooperation from the customer and customer-facility readiness, and can add time to the order fulfillment process. While we have generally been very successful in obtaining export licenses in a timely manner, there can be even more volatile and unpredictable dueno assurance that this will continue or that an export license can be obtained in each instance where it is required. If an export license is required but cannot be obtained, then we will not be permitted to export the product to the possibilitycustomer. The administrative processing, potential delay and risk of competing technologies, such as flash memory asultimately not obtaining an alternativeexport license pose a particular disadvantage to hard disk drives. Flash memory has come down in cost while increasing in capacity, resultingus relative to our non-U.S. competitors who are not required to comply with U.S. export controls. Non-compliance with the EAR or other applicable export regulations could result in a rapid shift in demand fromwide range of penalties including the hard disk drives made bydenial of export privileges, fines, criminal penalties, and the seizure of commodities. In the event that any export regulatory body determines that any of our customers to alternative storage technologies. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand forshipments violate applicable export regulations, we could be fined significant sums and/or our customers' products or rapid shifts in demand fromexport capabilities could be restricted, which could have a material adverse impact on our customers' products to alternative technologies could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.business.



We are exposed to risks associated with enteringour entrance into the emerging solar industry.

        An increasing strategic focus for Veeco is to supply equipment to the solar industry. In addition to the other risk factors described herein, the solar industry is characterized by other specific risks, including:

If we do not successfully manage the risks resulting from these and other changes occurring in the solar industry, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, solar is a relatively new market for us and poses the following additional challenges:


If we do not successfully manage the risks resulting from its entry into the solar market, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

WeThe timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may be requiredcause our quarterly operating results to take additional impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets or definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets.fluctuate significantly.

        We are required to assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment, or on an interim basis whenever events occur or circumstances change, such as an adverse change in business climate orderive a decline in the overall industry, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. We are also required to test our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets, including acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, for recoverability and impairment whenever there are indicators of impairment, such as an adverse change in business climate.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, the economic downturn became more significant and wide ranging as credit availability tightened and overall business and economic conditions deteriorated. It became apparent that the revenue, profitability, growth and other assumptions that we used in our fair value determination at October 1, 2008 (our annual measurement date), required revisions. Additionally, we realized a significant decline in our market capitalization which resulted in the carrying valuesubstantial portion of our net assets exceeding our market capitalization. Given these factors, we were required to perform an interim goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessment assales in any fiscal period from the sale of December 31, 2008. In addition, due to the presencea relatively small number of such impairment indicators, we performed an analysis as of December 31, 2008 of our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets. Based on these analyses, we incurred an asset impairment charge of $73.0 million consisting of $52.3 million related to goodwill, $5.0 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets, $14.6 million related to definite-lived intangible assets and $1.1 million in property, plant and equipment.

        At December 31, 2008, we had $59.2 million of goodwill and $103.3 million of intangible and long-lived assets.high-priced systems. As part of our long-term strategy, we may pursue future acquisitions of other companies or assets which could potentially increase our goodwill and intangible and long-lived assets. Further adverse changes in business conditions could materially impact our estimates of future operations anda result, in additional impairment charges to these assets. If our goodwill or intangible and long-lived assets were to become further impaired, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Any failure by us to execute our planned cost reductions successfully could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected.

        We have undertaken restructuring plans to bring operational expenses to appropriate levels for our business, including consolidation of business units, reduction in manufacturing facilities and significant personnel reductions. We may have further workforce reductions or rebalancing actions in the future. The reduction of personnel and consolidation of facilities may adversely affect our ability to manufacture our products in required volumes to meet customer demand and may result in other disruptions that affect our products and customer service, such as a decrease in employee morale and the failure to meet operational targets due to the loss of employees. We cannot be certain that these activities and transfers will be implemented on a cost-effective basis without delays or disruption in our production and without adversely affecting our customer relationships and results of operations.



The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business.

        Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers in the HB-LED, solar, data storage, and semiconductor markets, as well as customers in the scientific research and industrial market. We are subject to the business cycles of these industries, the timing length, and volatility of which are difficult to predict. These industries have historically been highly cyclical, have experienced significant economic downturns in the last decade and have suffered significant adverse consequences in the current economic downturn. Asrecognition of revenue for a capital equipment provider, our revenues depend in large part on the spending patterns of these customers, who often delay expenditures or cancel or reschedule orders in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. In downturns, we must be able to quickly and effectively align our costs with prevailing market conditions, as well as motivate and retain key employees. However, because a high proportion of our costs are fixed, our ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to revenue shortfalls is limited. A downturn in one or more of these industriessingle transaction could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. During periods of rapid growth, we must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand, and attract, hire, assimilate, and retain a sufficient number of qualified people. We cannot give assurances that our net sales and operating results willfor a particular fiscal period. As is typical in our industry, orders, shipments, and customer acceptances often occur during the last few weeks of a quarter. As a result, delay of only a week or two can often shift the related booking or sale into the next quarter, which could adversely affect our reported results for the prior quarter. Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend to continue. If our orders, shipments, net sales or operating results in a particular quarter do not meet expectations, our stock price may be adversely affected if our customers experience economic downturns or slowdowns in their businesses.affected.


We operate in industries characterized by rapid technological change.

        The HB-LED, solar, data storage, semiconductor, and scientific research and industrial industriesAll of our businesses are subject to rapid technological change. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to enhance existing products and develop and manufacture new products in a timely and cost effective manner and to accurately predict technology transitions. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, we must anticipate the future demand for products in selecting which development programs to fund and pursue. Our financial results for 20092011 and in the future will depend to a great extent on the successful introduction of several new products, many of which require achieving increasingly stringent technical specifications. The current economic downturn has slowed the rate of investment in and adoption of new technologies, which may make it more difficult for us to be successful in the introduction of new products and technologies. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or new technologies or in enhancing existing products.

We face significant competition.

        We face significant competition throughout the world in each of our reportable segments. Manysegments, which may increase as certain markets in which we operate continue to expand. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, and marketing resources than us. In addition, we face competition from smaller emerging equipment companies whose strategy is to provide a portion of the products and services we offer, using innovative technology to sell products into specialized markets. New product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified price competition resulting in lower margins. Our failure to compete successfully with these other companies would seriously harm our business.

We depend on a limited number of customers that operate in highly concentrated industries.

        Our customer base is and has been highly concentrated. Orders from a relatively limited number of customers have accounted for, and likely will continue to account for, a substantial portion of our net sales, which may lead customers to demand pricing and other terms less favorable to us. Based on net sales, Seagate Technology, Inc. is our five largest customer, accountingcustomers accounted for 17%52%, 10%,52% and 18%43% of our total net sales in 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.


        If a principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic setbacks, such as those currently being experienced by our data storage and semiconductor customers, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to increase sales in the future will depend in part upon our ability to obtain orders from new customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to do so. In addition, because a relatively small number of large manufacturers, many of whom are our customers, dominate the industries in which they operate, it may be especially difficult for us to replace these customers if we lose their business. A substantial portion of orders in our backlog are orders from our principal customers.

        In addition, a substantial investment is required by customers to install and integrate capital equipment into a production line. As a result, once a manufacturer has selected a particular vendor's capital equipment, we believe that the manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for the specific production line application and frequently will attempt to consolidate its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, if a customer selects a competitor's product over ours for technical superiority or other reasons, we could experience difficulty selling to that customer for a significant period of time.

        Furthermore, we do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, our agreements with our customers do not provide any assurance of future sales and we are exposed to competitive price pressure on each new order we attempt to obtain. Our failure to obtain new sales orders from new or existing customers would have a negative impact on our results of operations.



The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business.

        Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers in the HB LED, solar and data storage markets. We are subject to the business cycles of these industries, the timing, length, and volatility of which are difficult to predict. These industries have historically been highly cyclical and have experienced significant economic downturns in the last decade. As a capital equipment provider, our revenues depend in large part on the spending patterns of these customers, who often delay expenditures or cancel or reschedule orders in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. In downturns, we must be able to quickly and effectively align our costs with prevailing market conditions, as well as motivate and retain key employees. However, because a proportion of our orders, shipments, andcosts are fixed, our ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to revenue recognitionshortfalls may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

        We derive a substantial portionbe limited. A downturn in one or more of our net sales in any fiscal period from the sale of a relatively small number of high-priced systems. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue for a single transactionthese industries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. During periods of rapid growth, we must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand, and attract, hire, assimilate and retain a sufficient number of qualified people. We cannot give assurances that our net sales and operating results for a particular fiscal period. As is typical in our industry, orders, shipments, and customer acceptances often occur during the last few weeks of a quarter. As a result, delay of only a week or two can often shift the related booking or net sales into the next quarter, which could adversely affect our reported results for the prior quarter. Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend to continue. If our orders, shipments, net sales or operating results in a particular quarter dowill not meet expectations, our stock price may be adversely affected.

Changesaffected if our customers experience economic downturns or slowdowns in our product mix may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

        Certain of our products have historically had lower gross margins than other products. We expect this trend to continue. If a greater portion of our overall business in the future comes from products operating at lower gross margins, then our overall gross margins will decline. This could have an adverse effect on our stock price.

Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellation could result in decreased sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory.

        Customer purchase orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, generally with limited or no penalties. Often, we have incurred expenses prior to such cancellation without adequate monetary compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $8.0 million, consisting of $18.7 million for order cancellations, primarily from Asia Pacific MOCVD customers, and $2.0 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation, partially offset by $12.7 million dollars of backlog acquired in the Mill Lane acquisition in the second quarter of 2008. With the current economic downturn, we may experience an increased occurrence of cancellations and/or reschedulings.


        We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and future usage trends and other factors including the consideration of the amount of backlog we have on hand at any particular point in time. If our backlog is canceled or modified, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. Any such charges could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.their businesses.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable.

        Historically, we have experienced long and unpredictable sales cycles (the period between our initial contact with a potential customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer). Our sales cycle can range up to twelve months.months or longer. The timing of an order often depends on the capital expenditure budget cycle of our customers, which is completely out of our control. In addition, the time it takes us to build a product to customer specifications (the "build cycle") typically ranges from one to six months or longer, followed in certain cases by a period of customer acceptance during which the customer evaluates the performance of the system and may potentially reject the system. With the uncertainty and limited visibility related to the current economic downturn, many customers are reluctant to place orders for delivery in the future. Moreover, asAs a result of the build cycle and evaluation periods, the period between a customer's initial purchase decision and revenue recognition on an order often varies widely, and variations in length of this period can cause further fluctuations in our operating results. As a result of our lengthy sales cycle, we may incur significant research and development expenses and selling and general and administrative expenses before we generate the related revenues for these products. We may never generate the anticipated revenues if a customer cancels or changes plans. Variations in the length of our sales cycle could also cause our net sales and, therefore, our cash flow and net income to fluctuate widely from period to period.

The failure to successfully implement outsourcing activities and other operational initiatives could adversely affect results of operations.

        To better align our costs with market conditions, increase the percentage of variable costs relative to total costs and to increase productivity and operational efficiency, we have outsourced, and plan to increase the outsourcing of, certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of the new MOCVD systems and certain data storage process equipment systems. We expect to increase our outsourced manufacturing as we introduce new products in these areas. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing may adversely affect our ability to bring products to market and damage our reputation. Although we attempt to select reputable providers, it is possible that one or more of these providers could fail to perform as we expect. In addition, the expanded role of third party providers has required and will continue to require us to implement changes to our existing operations and adopt new procedures and processes for retaining and managing these providers in order to realize operational efficiencies, assure quality, and protect our intellectual property. If we do not timely and effectively develop and implement our outsourcing strategy or if third party providers do not perform as anticipated, we may not realize gross margin or productivity improvements and we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs, manufacturing interruptions or delays, inefficiencies in the structure and/or operation of our supply chain, loss of intellectual property rights, quality issues, increased product time-to-market and/or inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.



Manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect our ability to meet customer demand, while the failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete inventory.

        Our business depends on our ability to supply equipment, services and related products that meet the rapidly changing technical and volume requirements of our customers, which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from suppliers. Some key parts may be subject to long lead-times and/or obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by suppliers located in countries other than the United States. We may experience significant interruptions of our manufacturing operations, delays in our ability to deliver products or services, increased costs or customer order cancellations as a result of:

        In addition, our need to rapidly increase our business and manufacturing capacity to meet unanticipated increases in demand may exacerbate any interruptions in our manufacturing operations and supply chain and the associated effect on our working capital. Moreover, if actual demand for our products is different than expected, we may purchase more/fewer parts than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing or expediting delivery of parts. The volatility of demand for capital equipment increases capital, technical and other risks for companies in the supply chain. Any or all of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers.

        Failure of the suppliers of critical parts, components, and manufacturing equipment to deliver sufficient quantities in a timely and cost-effective manner could adversely affect our business. We generally do not have guaranteed supply or pricing arrangements with our suppliers. As a result, we risk increased cost of materials and difficulty in procuring the parts we need to fill customer orders. We currently use numerous suppliers; however, some key parts may be obtained only from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Failure of any of these suppliers to perform in a timely or quality manner could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations. At present, we rely primarily on two suppliers for the majority of the manufacturing of certain MOCVD and data storage process equipment systems. The failure of these suppliers to fulfill their contractual obligations under our supply arrangement and our inability to make alternate arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with our customers.

Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        Our success depends upon our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees, including those in executive, managerial, engineering and marketing positions, as well as highly skilled and qualified technical personnel and personnel to implement and monitor our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems. Attracting, retaining, and motivating such qualified personnel may be difficult due to challenging



industry conditions, competition for such personnel by other technology companies, consolidations and relocations of operations and workforce reductions. OurWhile we have entered into Employment Agreements with certain key personnel, our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

We are exposedThe price of our common shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.

        The stock market in general and the market for technology stocks in particular, has experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the risksoperating performance of operating a global business.

        Approximately 63%companies. If these market or industry-based fluctuations continue, the trading price of our 2008 net sales and 68%common shares could decline significantly



independent of our 2007 net sales were generated from sales outside the United States. We expect sales from non-U.S. markets to continue to representactual operating performance, and shareholders could lose all or a significant, and possibly increasing, portionsubstantial part of their investment. The market price of our salescommon shares could fluctuate significantly in the future. Our non-U.S. sales and operations are subjectresponse to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, many of which are outside our control, including:several factors, including among others:

        ManySignificant price and value fluctuations have occurred with respect to the publicly traded securities of these challenges are present in China, a large potential market forthe Company and technology companies generally. The price of our products and an area that we anticipate will present a significant opportunity for growth. These conditions in China and other foreign economies may continue and recur againcommon shares is likely to be volatile in the future,future. In the past, securities class action litigation often has been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, political instability, terrorism, acts of war or epidemics in regions where we operate maymaterially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks.

        We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that are inherent in our anticipated sales, sales commitments and assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Although we attempt to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, these hedging activities may not always be available or adequate to eliminate, or even mitigate, the impact of our exchange rate exposure. Failure to sufficiently hedge or otherwise manage foreign currency risks properly could materially and adversely affect our revenues and gross margins.

The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and could divert our valuablelimited resources.

        Our success depends in part upon the protection of our intellectual property rights. We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary information, technologies and processes. We own various United States and international patents and have additional pending patent applications relating to certain of our products and technologies. The process of seeking patent protection is lengthy and expensive, and we cannot be certain that pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents or that issued patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage. In addition, our intellectual property rights may be circumvented, invalidated or rendered obsolete by the rapid pace of technological change. Policing unauthorized use of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. Furthermore, the



laws of other countries may less effectively protect our proprietary rights than U.S. laws. Our outsourcing strategy requires that we share certain portions of our technology with our outsourcing partners, which poses additional risks of infringement and trade secret misappropriation. Infringement of our rights by a third party could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue opportunities. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary intellectual property rights as fully or as readily as United States laws.



Further, we cannot be certain that the laws and policies of any country, including the United States, with respect to intellectual property enforcement or licensing will not be changed in a way detrimental to the sale or use of our products or technology.

        We may need to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our ability to enforce one or more patents or incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Any action we take to enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and attention, which, in turn, could negatively impact our operating results. In addition, failure to protect our trademark rights could impair our brand identity.

We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others.

        From time to time we have received communications from other parties asserting the existence of patent or other rights which they believe cover certain of our products. We also periodically receive notice from customers who believe that we are required to indemnify them for damages they may incur related to infringement claims made against these customers by third parties. Our customary practice is to evaluate such assertions and to consider the available alternatives, including whether to seek a license, if appropriate. However, we cannot ensure that licenses can be obtained or, if obtained, will be on acceptable terms or that costly litigation or other administrative proceedings will not occur. If we are not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement of the matter, obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, and/or successfully prosecute or defend our position, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.

        We have considered numerous acquisition opportunities and completed several significant acquisitions in the past. We may consider acquisitions of, or investments in, other businesses in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, many of which are unpredictable and beyond our control, including:


        Our inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

        In addition, if we issue equity securities to pay for an acquisition, the ownership percentage of our then-existing shareholders would be reduced and the value of the shares held by these shareholders could be diluted, which could adversely affect the price of our stock and convertible subordinated



notes. If we use cash to pay for an acquisition, the payment could significantly reduce the cash that would be available to fund our operations or other purposes, including making payments on the convertible subordinated notes. There can be no assurance that financing for future acquisitions will be available on favorable terms or at all.

We are substantially leveraged, which could adversely affect our ability to adjust our business to respond to competitive pressures and to obtain sufficient funds to finance our future needs.

        We have significant indebtedness. As of December 31, 2008, we had total convertible long-term debt of approximately $105.6 million due in 2012. The degree to which we are leveraged could have important consequences, including but not limited to the following:

        Our ability to pay interest and principal on our debt securities, to satisfy our other debt obligations and to make planned expenditures will be dependent on our future operating performance, which could be affected by changes in economic conditions and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. A failure to comply with the covenants and other provisions of our debt instruments could result in events of default under such instruments, which could permit acceleration of the debt under such instruments and in some cases acceleration of debt under other instruments that contain cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions. If we are at any time unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, we may be required to attempttake additional impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets or definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets.

        We are required to renegotiateassess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment, or on an interim basis whenever certain events occur or circumstances change, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the termsoverall industry, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. We are also required to test our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets, including acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, for recoverability and impairment whenever there are indicators of impairment, such as an adverse change in business climate.

        At December 31, 2010, we had $52.0 million of goodwill and $59.2 million of intangible and long-lived assets, including $42.3 million of property, plant and equipment. As part of our long-term strategy, we may pursue future acquisitions of other companies or assets which could potentially increase our goodwill and intangible and long-lived assets. Adverse changes in business conditions could materially impact our estimates of future operations and result in additional impairment charges to these assets. If our goodwill or intangible and long-lived assets were to become further impaired, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not receive the escrowed proceeds from the sale of our Metrology business.

        In connection with the sale of our Metrology business to Bruker Corporation ("Bruker") on October 7, 2010, we agreed to indemnify Bruker, subject to certain limitations, for certain losses arising out of breaches of the instruments relatingrepresentations, warranties and covenants that we made in the Stock Purchase Agreement and in certain related documents. To secure these indemnification obligations, we agreed to deposit into escrow $22.9 million of the indebtedness, seekconsideration paid to refinanceus by Bruker, such funds to remain in escrow for twelve months following the closing. In the event of any qualifying indemnification claims, and after following the procedures set forth in the escrow agreement, all or a portion of the indebtedness or obtain additional financing. During the past few years, the markets for equityescrowed amount may be released and debt securities have fluctuated significantly, especially with respectreturned to technology-related companies, and during some periods offerings of those securities have been extremely difficultBruker to complete. As asatisfy such claims. This would result in a reduction in the future we may not be able to obtainpurchase price received for the additional funds required to fundsale of our operations, invest sufficientlyMetrology business, which could result in research and development, and repay or refinance our convertible subordinated notes on reasonable terms, or at all. Such a lack of funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.condition.

Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our financial results.

        Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results. For example, under FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1,Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), we will record additional non-cash interest expense in each reporting period during which our subordinated convertible notes remain outstanding. We expect the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and earnings per



share. This additional interest expense will not require the use of cash. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Application of Critical Accounting Policies" below. Other newNew accounting pronouncements or taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements or taxation practices have occurred and may occur in the future. New rules, changes to existing rules, if any, or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or change the way we conduct our business.

The price of our common shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.

        The stock market in general, and the market for technology stocks in particular, has recently experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of companies. If these market or industry-based fluctuations continue, the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly independent of our actual operating performance, and shareholders could lose all or a substantial part of their investment. The market price of our common shares could fluctuate significantly in response to several factors, including among others:

Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred with respect to the publicly traded securities of the Company and technology companies generally. The price of our common shares is likely to be volatile in the future. In the past, securities class action litigation often has been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We are subject to internal control evaluations and attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

        Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we must include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K a report of management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ongoing compliance with this requirement is complex, costly and time-consuming. Although our assessment, testing, and evaluation resulted in our conclusion that, as of December 31, 2008,2010, our



internal controls over financial reporting were effective, we cannot predict the outcome of our testing in future periods. If our internal controls are ineffective in future periods, or if our management does not timely assess the adequacy of such internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions, the public's perception of our Company may decline and our financial results or the market price of our shares could be adversely affected.



We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations.

        We are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations in connection with our business operations, including but not limited to regulations related to the development, manufacture, and use of our products. Failure or inability to comply with existing or future environmental and safety regulations could result in significant remediation liabilities, the imposition of fines and/or the suspension or termination of development, manufacture, or use of certain of our products, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have significant operations in California and other locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a natural disaster or other significant disruption.

        Our Metrology segment designs and manufactures our atomic force microscopes and other products in Santa Barbara, California. Our operations in thisthe U.S., the Asia-Pacific region and in other locationsareas could be subject to natural disasters or other significant disruptions, including earthquakes, fires, hurricanes, floods, water shortages, other extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, acts of terrorism, power shortages and blackouts, telecommunications failures, and other natural and manmade disasters or disruptions. In the event of such a natural disaster or other disruption, we could experience disruptions or interruptions to our operations or the operations of our suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers; destruction of facilities; and/or loss of life, all of which could materially increase our costs and expenses and materially and adversely affect our business, revenue and financial condition.

We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our Company by another company more difficult.

        We have adopted, and may in the future adopt, certain measures that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a takeover or other change in control of our Company that a holder of our common stock might not consider in its best interest. These measures include:

        Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 500,000 shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights (including voting rights), preferences and privileges of these shares ("blank check" preferred). Such preferred stock may have rights, including economic rights, senior to our common stock. As a result, the issuance of the preferred stock could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock and could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding common stock.

        Our board of directors is divided into three classes with each class serving a staggered three-year term. The existence of a classified board will make it more difficult for our shareholders to change the composition (and therefore the policies) of our board of directors in a relatively short period of time.

        We have adopted a shareholder rights plan, under which we have granted to our shareholders rights to purchase shares of junior participating preferred stock. This plan or "poison pill" could discourage a takeover that is not approved by our board of directors but which a shareholder might consider in its best interest, thereby adversely affecting our stock price.


        We have adopted certain certificate of incorporation and bylaws provisions which may have anti-takeover effects. These include: (a) requiring certain actions to be taken at a meeting of shareholders rather than by written consent, (b) requiring a super-majority of shareholders to call a



special meeting of shareholders or to approve certain amendments to our bylaws, (c) limiting the maximum number of directors, and (d) providing that directors may be removed only for "cause." These measures and those described above may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a takeover or other change in control of Veeco that a holder of our common stock might consider in its best interest.

        In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination, including mergers and asset sales, with an interested stockholder (generally, a 15% or greater stockholder) for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The operation of Section 203 may have anti-takeover effects, which could delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt that a holder of our common stock might consider in its best interest.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

Item 2.    Properties

        Our corporate headquarters office and our principal product development and marketing, manufacturing, research and development, training, and sales and service facilities, as well as the approximate size and the segments which utilize such facilities, are:

Owned Facilities Location
 Approximate Size
(sq. ft.)
 Mortgaged Use

Plainview, NY

  80,000 No Data Storage Process Equipmentand LED & Solar and Corporate Headquarters

Santa Barbara, CA

100,000NoMetrology

Somerset, NJ

  80,000 No LED & Solar Process Equipment

St. Paul, MN(1)

  125,000 Yes LED & Solar Process Equipment

Tucson, AZ(2)

  110,000 No Former Metrology Site

 

Leased Facilities Location
 Approximate Size
(sq. ft.)
 Lease Expires Use

Camarillo, CA

  48,000 2009 Data Storage Process Equipment

Camarillo, CA

  26,000 2012 Data Storage Process Equipment

Camarillo, CA

  19,000 2010 Metrology

Fort Collins, CO

  42,000 2009 Data Storage Process Equipment

Fremont, CA

  14,000 2010 Sales and Service

Lowell, MA

  28,000 2010 LED & Solar Process Equipment

Lowell, MA

  12,000 Month-to-
month
 LED & Solar Process Equipment

Ventura, CA(3)

  125,000 2009 Held for sublease

Woodbury, NY(4)

  32,000 2011 Held for sublease

Leased Facilities Location
 Approximate Size
(sq. ft.)
 Lease Expires Use

Camarillo, CA(3)

  26,000  2012 Data Storage and partially held for sublease

Fort Collins, CO

  26,000  2011 Data Storage

Clifton Park, NY

  18,000  2014 LED & Solar

Clifton Park, NY

  8,000  2011 LED & Solar

Lowell, MA

  28,000  2012 LED & Solar

Somerset, NJ

  14,500  2011 LED & Solar

Somerset, NJ

  9,500  2012 LED & Solar

Shanghai, China

  17,400  2012 Customer Training Center

Woodbury, NY(4)

  32,000  2011 Former Corporate Headquarters

(1)
Our LED & Solar Process Equipment segment utilizes approximately 95,000 square feet of this facility. The balance is available for expansion.

(2)
OurWe vacated this facility during the fourth quarter of 2010 in conjunction with the sale of our Metrology segment utilizes approximately 75,000 square feet ofto Bruker. We are currently leasing this facility. The balance is available for expansion.office to Bruker in accordance with a transition services agreement which will expire on October 6, 2011.


(3)
ThisWe vacated this facility is leased fromduring the former ownersecond quarter of Manufacturing Technology, Inc. ("MTI").2009 in conjunction with the outsourcing of manufacturing for certain Data Storage product lines. We have subleasedreoccupied a portion of this buildingspace and are marketing the remainder of this facilityremaining space for sublease.


(4)
We vacated our former Woodbury headquarters during the first quarter of 2008 and consolidated our operations into our Plainview New York manufacturing facility. We are marketing this office space for sublease.

        The St. Paul, Minnesota facility is subject to a mortgage, which at December 31, 2008,2010, had an outstanding balance of $3.3$2.9 million. We also lease small offices in Chadds Ford, PennsylvaniaSanta Clara, California, Chelmsford, Massachusetts and Edina, Minnesota for sales and service. Our foreign subsidiaries lease office space for use as sales and service centers in England, France, Germany, Netherlands, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, China and Taiwan. We believe our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

Environmental

        We may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay up to $250,000 in connection with the implementation of a comprehensive plan of environmental remediation at our Plainview, New York facility. We have been indemnified by the former owner for any liabilities we may incur in excess of $250,000 with respect to any such remediation. No comprehensive plan has been required to date. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any remediation plan that may be proposed.

        We are aware that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been detected in the soil at the site of a facility formerly leased by us in Santa Barbara, California. We have been indemnified for any liabilities we may incur which arise from environmental contamination at the site. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any such liabilities.

        The former owner of the land and building in which our Santa Barbara, California in which our former Metrology operations arewere located (which business was sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010), has disclosed that there are hazardous substances present in the ground under the building. Management believes that the comprehensive indemnification clause that iswas part of the purchase contract relating to the purchase of such land provides adequate protection against any environmental issues that may arise.

Non-Environmental

        On September 17, 2003, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Inc. ("Asylum"), a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees. The lawsuit alleged that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum's MFP-3D AFM constituted willful infringement of five patents owned by us, We have provided Bruker with similar indemnification as well as other claims. We claimed unspecified monetary damages and requested a permanent injunction to stop infringement. Asylum asserted that the patents we sued on are invalid and unenforceable, and filed a counterclaim for infringement of a patent licensed by Asylum, and payment of royalties it believes it was owed. In August 2008, we settled the litigation. In the settlement, Veeco and Asylum agreed to drop all pending claims against each other and agreed to a five year, worldwide cross license of each company's patents that were the subject of the dispute and a mutual covenant not to sue on patents either party has a right to assert. As part of the settlement, Asylum acknowledged the validity of the Veeco patents asserted in the case and made payment to us for license fees and will pay an ongoing royalty to us for the five-year term of the cross license. During the case, we capitalized the legal costs we incurred to defend our patents and are now amortizing these capitalized costs over the remaining lives of these patents. Payments received from Asylum for license fees and royalties have been and will continue to be netted against these capitalized defense costs upon receipt. We are not required to make any payments to Asylum under this settlement, including any royalties relating to the cross license.sale.


        Three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against our directors and certain of our officers in March and April of 2005 in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action asserted that our directors and certain of our officers breached fiduciary duties in connection with the improper accounting transactions discovered at our TurboDisc business unit which led to the restatement in March 2005 of our financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and a securities class action lawsuit brought in February 2005 and settled in November 2007. On November 5, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve the consolidated shareholder derivative action for a payment of approximately $0.5 million and our agreement to adopt certain changes to our corporate Governance Guidelines. The settlement was approved by the Court on March 28, 2008. Insurance proceeds covered the settlement amount and legal expenses related to the settlement. The settlement dismissed all pending claims against us and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by us or any of the other defendants, and we and the other defendants received a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.Non-Environmental

        We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders(Removed and Reserved).

        None.



PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ National Market under the symbol "VECO." The 20082010 and 20072009 high and low closing bid prices by quarter are as follows:

 
 2008 2007 
 
 High Low High Low 

First Quarter

 $17.96 $12.39 $20.87 $18.68 

Second Quarter

  19.71  16.63  20.95  17.05 

Third Quarter

  18.11  14.42  22.09  15.50 

Fourth Quarter

  14.81  3.83  20.20  15.82 

 
 2010 2009 
 
 High Low High Low 

First Quarter

 $43.72 $30.42 $7.16 $3.96 

Second Quarter

  51.61  31.79  12.99  6.19 

Third Quarter

  45.52  31.02  23.49  11.36 

Fourth Quarter

  49.97  33.71  34.35  21.90 

        On February 26, 2009,22, 2011, the closing bid price for our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market was $4.38. As of February 26, 2009,$47.04 and we had 386144 shareholders of record.

        InAs of December 2001 and January 2002,31, 2010 we issued $220.0 millionhad convertible notes of 4.125% convertible subordinated$105.6 million. The notes (the "Old Notes") in a private placement. During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of these notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased an additional $56.0 million of these notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the Old Notes to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the original notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of Old Notes remained outstanding. The remaining Old Notes were convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $38.51 per share. We paid interest on these remaining Old Notes on June 21 and December 21 of each year and during the fourth quarter of 2008, we repaid the outstanding principal amount of the remaining $25.2 million of Old Notes outstanding. The New Notes bearaccrue interest at 4.125% per annum and mature on April 15, 2012. TheseThe notes are convertible, atmeet the optioncriteria for determining the effect of the holder,assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, since we have the ability and the intent to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash. Under the terms of the notes, we may pay the principal amount of converted notes in cash or in shares of common stock. We intend to pay such amounts in cash. Holders may convert the notes at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including our common stock trading at prices equal to or above 130% overof the conversion price for at least 20 trading days during the final 30 trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, our common stock was trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for the specified period and, as a specified period. Suchresult, the convertible notes are convertible during the first quarter of 2011. Accordingly, the balance of the convertible notes at December 31, 2010 has been classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. On February 14, 2011, at the option of the holder, $7.5 million of notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $27.23$45.95 per share.share in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2011 we will take a charge for the related unamortized debt discount totaling $0.3 million. We pay interest on these notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year.

        We have not paid dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain future earnings for the development of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate that the Board of Directors will declare or pay any dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, certain provisions of our credit facility limit our ability to pay dividends. The Board of Directors will determine future dividend policy based on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other circumstances.


Stock Performance Graph

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Veeco Instruments Inc., The S&P Smallcap 600 Index,
The PhiladelphiaPHLX Semiconductor Index And A Peer GroupRDG MidCap Technology Index

*
$100 invested on 12/31/0305 in stock or index-includingindex, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.

        Copyright© 2011 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.


ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 20032005
ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31

 
 Cumulative Total Return as of December 31, 
 
 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

Veeco Instruments Inc. 

  100.0  74.82  61.54  66.51  59.30  22.51 

Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOXX)

  100.0  88.84  115.83  128.45  125.92  91.10 

Peer Group Index

  100.0  82.42  79.84  105.29  106.27  46.40 

S&P Smallcap 600 Index

  100.0  122.65  132.07  152.04  151.58  104.48 

        Information is presented assuming $100 invested on December 31, 2003 and the reinvestment of dividends, if any. The Peer Group Index consists of the following companies: ASM International N.V., Axcelis Technologies Inc., FEI Company, FSI International Inc., Mattson Technology Inc., Rudolph Technologies Inc., Semitool Inc., Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Inc. and Zygo Corp.

 
 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

  100.00  108.08  96.36  36.58  190.65  247.89 

S&P Smallcap 600

  100.00  115.12  114.78  79.11  99.34  125.47 

PHLX Semiconductor

  100.00  94.47  102.99  56.15  91.67  103.11 

RDG MidCap Technology

  100.00  111.34  110.83  56.91  90.56  114.02 

Treasury Stock

        The following table contains the Company's stock repurchases of equity securities in the fourth quarter of 2010:

Period
 Total Number of
Shares
Repurchased
 Average Price
Paid Per Share
 Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Program(1)
 Approximate Dollar Value of
Shares that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Program(1)
 

Fiscal month of October 2010 (September 27, 2010—October 24, 2010)(2)

  189,218  34.33  1,118,600  161,901,746 

(1)
On August 24, 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock until August 26, 2011. The program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at the Company's discretion.

(2)
We had no repurchases in the fiscal months of November and December 2010.

Item 6.   Selected Consolidated Financial Data

        The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 
 Years ended December 31, 
 
 2008(1) 2007(2) 2006(3) 2005(4) 2004(5) 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Statement of Operations Data:

                

Net sales

 $442,809 $402,475 $441,034 $410,190 $390,443 

Operating (loss) income

  (70,558) (12,061) 22,456  11,066  (11,558)

Net (loss) income

 $(71,063)$(17,359)$14,917 $(897)$(62,555)

Net (loss) income per common share:

                
 

Net (loss) income per common share

 $(2.27)$(0.56)$0.49 $(0.03)$(2.11)
 

Diluted net (loss) income per common share

 $(2.27)$(0.56)$0.48 $(0.03)$(2.11)

Weighted average shares outstanding

  31,347  31,020  30,492  29,921  29,650 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  31,347  31,020  31,059  29,921  29,650 

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010(1) 2009(2) 2008(3) 2007(4) 2006(5) 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Statement of Operations Data:

                

Net sales

 $933,231 $282,412 $314,935 $252,031 $268,880 

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations

  277,575  (4,732) (46,140) (18,245) (5,767)

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes

  260,531  (14,229) (50,833) (23,655) (4,620)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

  101,229  (1,403) (24,588) 3,817  18,179 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

    (65) (230) (628) (1,358)
            

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $361,760 $(15,567)$(75,191)$(19,210)$14,917 
            

Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

                

Basic:

                
  

Continuing operations

 $6.60 $(0.44)$(1.62)$(0.74)$(0.11)
  

Discontinued operations

  2.56  (0.04) (0.78) 0.12  0.60 
            
 

Income (loss)

 $9.16 $(0.48)$(2.40)$(0.62)$0.49 
            

Diluted :

                
  

Continuing operations

 $6.13 $(0.44)$(1.62)$(0.74)$(0.11)
  

Discontinued operations

  2.38  (0.04) (0.78) 0.12  0.60 
            
 

Income (loss)

 $8.51 $(0.48)$(2.40)$(0.62)$0.49 
            

Weighted average shares outstanding:

��               
  

Basic

  39,499  32,628  31,347  31,020  30,492 
  

Diluted

  42,514  32,628  31,347  31,020  30,492 

 

 
 Years ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $103,799 $117,083 $147,046 $124,499 $100,276 

Working capital

  168,528  174,516  248,060  229,650  216,802 

Goodwill

  59,160  100,898  100,898  99,622  94,645 

Total assets

  429,541  529,334  589,600  567,860  576,913 

Long-term debt (including current installments)

  108,865  146,585  209,204  229,580  229,935 

Shareholders' equity

  214,687  273,677  281,751  248,587  252,352 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $245,132 $148,500 $102,521 $116,875 $146,880 

Short-term investments

  394,180  135,000       

Restricted cash

  76,115         

Working capital

  640,139  317,317  168,528  112,089  172,447 

Goodwill

  52,003  52,003  51,741  71,544  71,544 

Total assets

  1,148,034  605,372  429,541  529,334  589,600 

Long-term debt (including current installments)

  104,021  101,176  98,526  132,118  203,774 

Total equity

  762,512  359,059  225,026  288,144  281,751 

(1)
On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology's

(2)
Operating loss and net loss from continuing operations include restructuring expenses of $4.8 million, as well as an asset impairment charge of $0.3 million for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage segment and a $1.5 million inventory write-off associated with Data Storage legacy products.

(3)
Operating loss and net loss from continuing operations include a $73.3$51.4 million asset impairment charge of which $52.3$30.4 million was related to goodwill and $21.0 million was related to other long-lived assets, a restructuring charge of $10.6$9.4 million consisting of lease-related commitments, the mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with our former CEO and personnel severance costs an inventory write-off of $2.9 million included in cost of sales in Metrology and $1.5 million in cost of sales related to the required purchase accounting adjustment to write up inventory to fair value in connection with the purchase of Mill Lane Engineering. Net loss from continuing operations also reflects a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $5.0 million and the elimination of 80.1% of the net operating results of the Fluens Corporation ("Fluens") related to noncontrolling interest.$3.8 million.

(2)(4)
Operating loss and net loss from continuing operations include restructuring expenses of $6.7$4.8 million, as well as charges of $1.1 million and $4.8 million associated with the write-off of property and equipment and inventory, respectively, related to product lines discontinued as part of management's cost reduction plan. Net incomeloss from continuing operations also reflects a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.7 million and the elimination of 80.1% of the net operating results of Fluens related to noncontrolling interest.million.

(3)(5)
Operating income and net incomeloss from continuing operations are net of a write-off of $1.2 million of in-process research and development projects related to the Fluens acquisition. Net incomeloss from continuing operations also reflects a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3 million and the elimination of 80.1% of the net operating results of Fluens related to noncontrolling interest.million.

(4)
Operating income and net loss include restructuring expenses of $1.2 million.

(5)
Operating loss and net loss include (a) restructuring costs of $2.8 million, (b) costs related to the internal investigation of improper accounting transactions at our TurboDisc business unit of $0.8 million, (c) asset impairment charges of $0.8 million related to the consolidation of the Advanced Imaging, Inc. ("Aii") and MTI businesses, and (d) $0.6 million related to the write-off of purchased in-process technology in connection with the MTI acquisition. Net loss also includes a charge of approximately $54.0 million to establish a valuation allowance against substantially all of our domestic net deferred tax assets.

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary

        We designmake equipment to develop and manufacture enabling solutions for customers in HB-LED,light emitting diodes ("LEDs"), solar data storage, semiconductor, scientific researchpanels, hard-disk drives and industrial markets.other devices. We have leading technology positions in our three reportabletwo segments: LED & Solar Process Equipment,and Data Storage Process Equipment, and Metrology.Storage.

        In our LED & Solar segment, we design and manufacture MOCVDmetal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, MBEmolecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, Copper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide ("CIGS") deposition systems and sources, and other types ofthermal deposition systems such as web coaters,sources which we sell to manufacturers of HB-LEDs,high brightness LEDs ("HB LED") and solar panels, and wireless telecommunications devices andas well as to universities and scientific research centers.customers.

        In our Data Storage segment, we design and manufacture ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing productssystems primarily used to create TFMHsthin film magnetic heads ("TFMHs") that read and write data on hard disk drives.

        InWe support our Metrology segment, we designcustomers through product development, manufacturing, sales and manufacture AFMs, SPMs, stylus profilers, and optical interferometers used to provide critical surface measurementsservice sites in research and production environments. This broad line of products is used in universities, research facilities and scientific centers worldwide. In production environments such as semiconductor, data storagethe U.S., Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and other industries, our metrology instruments enable customers to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality.

        During 2008, we continued our multi-quarter plan to improve profitability and reduce and contain spending. During 2008, we made progress against the initiatives that management set, continued our restructuring plan and executed activities with a focus on creating a more variable cost effective organization. These activities included downsizing and consolidating some locations, reducing our workforce, consultants and discretionary expenses and realigning our sales organization and engineering groups. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $10.6 million, an inventory write-off of $2.9 million in cost of sales related to legacy semiconductor products and $1.5 million in cost of sales related to the required purchase accounting adjustment to write up inventory to fair value in connection with the purchase of Mill Lane during the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, due to a weakened and deteriorating business environment, we incurred an asset impairment charge of $73.3 million consisting of $52.3 million related to goodwill and $21.0 million related to other long-lived assets.locations.

Summary of Results for 20082010

        DespiteIn 2010, Veeco reported the extremely challenging market environment that necessitated a significant impairment charge,best year in 2008 we reported higher revenues, positive impact from its cost containment initiatives,history in terms of revenue and a significantly improved balance sheet as a result of the cash flow from operations and the repayment of debt. We made progress to refocus the business and drive R&D investments to higher-growth end market opportunities.profitability. Selected financial highlights include:



Business Highlights of 2008 included:2010

        Veeco's 2010 results were at record levels, with revenue of $933 million and net income from continuing operations of $261 million. These results were achieved through a combination of world-class products, a focus on high-growth market opportunities, operational excellence, our flexible manufacturing strategy, and a deep commitment to satisfying our global customers.

Outlook/OpportunitiesOutlook

        At the endWith starting backlog of 2008, the global economy entered a period of what appears to$555 million, and anticipating strong first half 2011 bookings, we currently forecast that Veeco's 2011 revenues will be an unprecedented slowdown, which is impacting all of our end markets. We expect 2009 to be a very difficult year for us as we continue to experience weak new order conditions and customers foregoing capacity and technology investments. As evidence of this decline, our trailing six month order rate decreased 27% compared to the first six months of 2008. In addition, customers have delayed approximately $30.0 million of shipments originally scheduled for the first quarter of 2009 until later in the year.greater than $1 billion. We are forecastingoptimistic about the future and believe that we are well positioned from a very weak start to 2009, with first quarter revenues between $60 million and $70 million, well below prior quarter levels.

        In light of the declining business conditions, in the fall of 2008 we initiated a significant restructuring program. The details of this program were formally announced in February 2009.


Key areas of focus for our restructuring activities include:

Specifically, our restructuring program includes:

        We have moved swiftly to restructure the Company to lower its quarterly breakeven level to $80 million from over $100 million in the third quarter of 2008. We anticipate that these restructuring actions will result in annualized savings of over $36 million: approximately $20 million reduction in manufacturing labor and overhead and service costs which are included in cost of goods sold, and $16 million reduction in operating spending.

        While we are dramatically changing the organization and cutting overall spending in 2009, we are also continuing to invest in R&D for high-growth opportunities, with particular emphasis on LED & Solar and new applications for Metrology instruments. DespiteData Storage businesses in 2011 and beyond.

        As we look toward the current pause in capacity spending,future, we anticipate strong multi-yearbelieve that the HB LED industry growth tied to further adoptionwill continue its multi-year MOCVD tool investment cycle as HB LEDs increase their penetration in backlighting applications and general illumination. We are also seeing strong interest in our thermal deposition solutions for the manufacturing of applications such as TVs and laptops. Our solar growth strategy is based on building an integrated equipment offering for CIGS thin film solar cells, emergingand believe that Veeco is well positioned to increase our business in this market. In addition, overall business conditions in our Data Storage segment appear to be continuing to improve and with a strong starting-year backlog, we are forecasting revenue growth in this business in 2011.

        Our outlook discussion above constitutes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the next generation low cost, high efficiency solar technology. We also remain aligned with our key data storage customers'Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our expectations regarding future results are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.

        You should not place undue reliance on their technology roadmaps in order to secure future growth opportunities.any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates they are made.


Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 20082010 and 20072009

        The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales and comparisons between 20082010 and 20072009 (dollars in 000s):

 
 Year ended December 31, Dollar and
Percentage
Change
Year to Year
 
 
 2008 2007 

Net sales

 $442,809  100.0%$402,475  100.0%$40,334  10.0%

Cost of sales

  266,215  60.1  244,964  60.9  21,251  8.7 
              

Gross profit

  176,594  39.9  157,511  39.1  19,083  12.1 

Operating expenses:

                   
 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

  92,838  21.0  90,972  22.6  1,866  2.1 
 

Research and development expense

  60,353  13.6  61,174  15.2  (821) (1.3)
 

Amortization expense

  10,745  2.4  10,250  2.5  495  4.8 
 

Restructuring expense

  10,562  2.4  6,726  1.7  3,836  57.0 
 

Asset impairment charge

  73,322  16.6  1,068  0.3  72,254  6,765.4 
 

Other income, net

  (668) (0.2) (618) (0.2) (50) 8.1 
              

Total operating expenses

  247,152  55.8  169,572  42.1  77,580  45.8 
              

Operating loss

  (70,558) (15.9) (12,061) (3.0) (58,497) 485.0 

Interest expense

  6,400  1.4  6,976  1.7  (576) (8.3)

Interest income

  (2,588) (0.6) (3,963) (1.0) 1,375  (34.7)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

  (4,969) (1.1) (738) (0.1) (4,231) 573.3 
              

Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  (69,401) (15.7) (14,336) (3.6) (55,065) 384.1 

Income tax provision

  1,892  0.4  3,651  0.9  (1,759) (48.2)

Noncontrolling interest

  (230) (0.1) (628) (0.2) 398  (63.4)
              

Net loss

 $(71,063) (16.0)%$(17,359) (4.3)%$(53,704) 309.4%
              

 
 Year ended December 31, Dollar and
Percentage
Change
Year to Year
 
 
 2010 2009 

Net sales

 $933,231  100.0%$282,412  100.0%$650,819  230.5%

Cost of sales

  489,406  52.4  171,177  60.6  318,229  185.9 
              

Gross profit

  443,825  47.6  111,235  39.4  332,590  299.0 

Operating expenses (income):

                   

Selling, general and administrative

  91,777  9.8  62,151  22.0  29,626  47.7 

Research and development

  71,390  7.6  43,483  15.4  27,907  64.2 

Amortization

  4,876  0.5  5,168  1.8  (292) (5.7)

Restructuring

  (179)   4,837  1.7  (5,016) * 

Asset impairment

      304  0.1  (304) (100.0)

Other, net

  (1,614) (0.2) 24  0.0  (1,638) * 
              

Total operating expenses

  166,250  17.8  115,967  41.1  50,283  43.4 
              

Operating income (loss)

  277,575  29.7  (4,732) (1.7) 282,307  * 

Interest expense, net

  6,572  0.7  6,850  2.4  (278) (4.1)
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

  271,003  29.0  (11,582) (4.1) 282,585  * 

Income tax provision

  10,472  1.1  2,647  0.9  7,825  295.6 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  260,531  27.9  (14,229) (5.0) 274,760  * 

Discontinued operations:

                   
 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes (includes gain on disposal of $156,290 in 2010)

  155,455  16.7  (2,703) (1.0) 158,158  * 
 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  54,226  5.8  (1,300) (0.5) 55,526  * 
              

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  101,229  10.8  (1,403) (0.5) 102,632  * 
              

Net income (loss)

  361,760  38.8  (15,632) (5.5) 377,392  * 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

      (65) 0.1  65  (100.0)
              

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $361,760  38.8%$(15,567) (5.5)%$377,327  * 
              

*
Not Meaningful

Net Sales and Orders

        Net sales of $442.8$933.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, were up 10.0%,230.5% compared to 2007.2009. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment and by region (dollars in 000s):

 
 Sales Orders  
  
 
 
 Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Book to Bill Ratio 
 
 2008 2007 Year to Year 2008 2007 Year to Year 2008 2007 

Segment Analysis

                               
 

LED & Solar Process Equipment

 $165,812 $115,863 $49,949  43.1%$160,162 $163,970 $(3,808) (2.3)% 0.97  1.42 
 

Data Storage Process Equipment

  149,123  136,169  12,954  9.5  138,653  141,663  (3,010) (2.1) 0.93  1.04 
 

Metrology

  127,874  150,443  (22,569) (15.0) 125,622  145,939  (20,317) (13.9) 0.98  0.97 
                      
 

Total

 $442,809 $402,475 $40,334  10.0%$424,437 $451,572 $(27,135) (6.0)% 0.96  1.12 
                      

Regional Analysis

                               
 

Americas

 $165,926 $130,500 $35,426  27.1%$145,082 $150,748 $(5,666) (3.8)% 0.87  1.16 
 

Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA")

  94,142  77,985  16,157  20.7  86,518  106,178  (19,660) (18.5) 0.92  1.36 
 

Japan

  38,453  55,815  (17,362) (31.1) 31,593  48,764  (17,171) (35.2) 0.82  0.87 
 

Asia Pacific

  144,288  138,175  6,113  4.4  161,244  145,882  15,362  10.5  1.12  1.06 
                      
 

Total

 $442,809 $402,475 $40,334  10.0%$424,437 $451,572 $(27,135) (6.0)% 0.96  1.12 
                      

 
 Sales Orders 
 
 Year ended
December 31,
 Dollar and Percentage
Change
 Year ended
December 31,
 Dollar and Percentage
Change
 Book to Bill
Ratio
 
 
 2010 2009 Year to Year 2010 2009 Year to Year 2010 2009 

Segment Analysis

                               
 

LED & Solar

 $797,904 $205,153 $592,751  288.9%$968,232 $440,784 $527,448  119.7% 1.21  2.15 
 

Data Storage

  135,327  77,259  58,068  75.2  153,406  97,497  55,909  57.3  1.13  1.26 
                      
 

Total

 $933,231 $282,412 $650,819  230.5%$1,121,638 $538,281 $583,357  108.4% 1.20  1.91 
                      

Regional Analysis

                               
 

Americas

 $94,985 $60,730 $34,255  56.4%$107,128 $78,196 $28,932  37.0% 1.13  1.29 
                      
 

Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA")

  92,112  50,088  42,024  83.9  83,784  47,186  36,598  77.6  0.91  0.94 
                      
  

Korea

  301,026  99,132  201,894  203.7  207,337  236,114  (28,777) (12.2) 0.69  2.38 
  

China

  266,813  31,114  235,699  757.5  537,740  90,724  447,016  492.7  2.02  2.92 
  

Taiwan

  101,130  13,882  87,248  628.5  112,016  34,642  77,374  223.4  1.11  2.50 
  

Other Asia Pacific

  77,165  27,466  49,699  180.9  73,633  51,419  22,214  43.2  0.95  1.87 
                      
 

Asia Pacific

  746,134  171,594  574,540  334.8  930,726  412,899  517,827  125.4  1.25  2.41 
                      
 

Total

 $933,231 $282,412 $650,819  230.5%$1,121,638 $538,281 $583,357  108.4% 1.20  1.91 
                      

        By segment, LED & Solar Process Equipment sales increased 43.1%288.9% in 2010 due to an increaseincreases in end user demand from expanding applications for HB-LEDs, strong customer acceptanceshipments of Veeco'sour newest generation systems successful introduction of new thermal deposition sources for CIGS solar cells, and $12.9 millionas compared to 2009 (334 system shipments in sales from the solar equipment product line, which was acquired2010 versus 72 system shipments in the second quarter of 20082009 in our MOCVD business) as a result of the Mill Lane acquisition. Additionally,an increase in demand for HB LED backlighting applications and general illumination. Data Storage Process Equipment sales were up 9.5%also increased 75.2%, primarily as a result of customers'an increase in capital spending by data storage customers for capacity and technology and capacity requirements. Partially offsetting these increases was a decline in Metrology sales of 15.0%, primarily due to the slowdown in the semiconductor and research and industrial markets.buys. LED & Solar Process Equipment sales represented 37.4%85.5% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, up from 28.8%72.6% in the prior year period.year. Data Storage Process Equipment sales accounted for 33.7%14.5% of net sales, down slightly from 33.8%27.4% in the prior year period. Metrology sales accounted for 28.9% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008, down from 37.4% in the prior year period.year. By region, net sales increased by 27.1%, 20.7% and 4.4%334.8% in Asia Pacific, primarily due to MOCVD sales to HB LED customers. In addition, sales in the Americas and EMEA also increased 56.4% and Asia Pacific, respectively, while sales in Japan declined 31.1%.83.9%, respectively. We believe that there will continue to be period-to-periodyear-to-year variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

        Orders in 2008 decreased 6.0%2010 increased 108.4% compared to 2007,2009, primarily attributable to a 13.9% decline119.7% increase in Metrology orders due to a decrease in orders for AFM products resulting from lower demand in the semiconductor and research and industrial markets. The 2.3% decrease in orders for LED & Solar Process Equipment was due primarily to the decline in MOCVD orders as the HB-LED industry absorbs the significant number of new MOCVD systems purchased in the past two years.that were principally driven by HB LED manufacturers increasing production for television and laptop backlighting applications. Data Storage Process Equipment orders declined 2.1% due toincreased 57.3% from the reductioncontinued increase in customers' futureour customer's capital equipment requirements. In addition, the global credit crisis has caused our customers to delay or foregospending for capacity and technology purchases for our products.buys.

        Our book-to-bill ratio for 2008,2010, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was 0.961.20 to 1.1 compared to 1.91 to 1 in 2009. Our backlog as of December 31, 2008,2010 was $147.2$555.0 million, compared to $173.5$377.3 million as of December 31, 2007.2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $8.0$10.7 million, consisting of $18.7$12.5 million for order cancellations, primarily from Asia Pacific MOCVD customers,adjustments ($10.2 million is related to our Solar and $2.0MBE businesses), offset by $1.8 million of adjustments related to foreign currency translation, partially offset by $12.7 million



dollars of backlog acquired in the Mill Lane acquisition in the second quarter of 2008.translation. For certain sales arrangements we require a deposit for a portion of the sales price before shipment. As of December 31, 20082010 and 2009 we havehad deposits and advanced billings of $18.0 million. Due to changing business conditions$129.2 million and weak capital equipment spending by customers in our businesses, we may continue to experience cancellations and/or rescheduling of orders, particularly as the economic downturn has become more significant and wide ranging as credit availability has tightened and financial conditions have deteriorated. We expect 2009 to be a very difficult year for the Company as we continue to experience weak new order conditions and customers foregoing capacity and technology investments. In addition, customers have delayed approximately $30.0$59.8 million, of shipments originally scheduled for the first quarter of 2009 until later in the year.respectively.


Gross Profit

        Gross profit was $443.8 million or 47.6% for 2008 was 39.9%,2010 compared to 39.1%$111.2 million or 39.4% in 2007. Strong performance in both our2009. LED & Solar and Data Storage Process Equipment businesses were due primarily to a 25% increase in sales volume and favorable product mix. LED & Solar Process Equipment gross margins increased to 47.4% from 37.8%40.4% in the prior year, to 38.5%, primarily due to a 43.1% increaseincreases in sales volume as well as favorable pricing on new(262 additional system shipments and 185 additional final acceptances received compared to prior year in our MOCVD products, despite a reduction in gross profit of $1.5 million during 2008 related to the acquisition of Mill Lane. This reduction was the result of purchase accounting, which requires adjustments to capitalize inventory at fair value. This impact is reflected in cost of sales during 2008.business) and higher average selling prices coupled with lower manufacturing costs. Data Storage Process Equipment gross margins increased to 48.5% from 34.7%36.6% in the prior year to 40.5% mainly due to increased sales volume as well asand a favorable pricing and product mix compared to the prior year. In 2007,mix. During 2009, Data Storage Process Equipment gross margin was also negatively impacted by a charge of $4.8 million for the write-off of inventory associated with certain discontinued data storage product lines. Metrology gross margins declined from 44.1% in the prior year to 41.0%, principally due to 15.0% lower sales volume, partially offset by a reduction in spending associated with cost savings initiatives. Metrology gross margins were also negatively impacted by a charge to cost of sales of $2.9$1.5 million during 2008 for the write off of inventory associated with discontinued legacy semiconductor products.product lines.

Operating Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.9$29.6 million or 2.1%47.7%, from the prior year primarily due to an increasesupport the business ramp in bonus and profit sharing, an increase in equity compensation, salaries and fringe expense, and an increase in spending associated with the acquisition of Mill Lane in the second quarter of 2008. This was partially offset by reductions in consulting, travel and entertainment and insurance and facilities costs associated with our continuing cost savings initiatives.LED & Solar segment. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 21.0%9.8% of net sales in 2008,2010, compared with 22.6%22.0% of net sales in the prior year.

        Research and development expense decreased $0.8increased $27.9 million or 64.2% from the prior year, primarily due to a more focused approach to data storage and metrologycontinued product development offset by an increase in product improvement efforts and new product developmentareas of high-growth for end market opportunities in our LED & Solar segment. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense decreased to 13.6%7.6% from 15.2%15.4% in the prior year.

        Amortization expense was $10.7decreased $0.3 million in 2008, compared to $10.2 million in 2007. The increase was primarilyor 5.7% from the prior year. This decrease is mainly due to additional amortization associated with intangible assets acquired as part of the acquisition of Mill Lane in the second quarter of 2008, partially offset by certain technology-based intangible assets becomingintangibles being fully amortized during 2007.at the end of 2009.

        Restructuring expensecredit of $10.6$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, consisted of personnel severance costs of $6.5 million, including $3.7 million related2010, was attributable to the mutually agreed-upon termination ofa change in estimate in our former CEO's employment agreement and $2.8 million associated with the



reduction of approximately 74 employees, or 6%, of the Company's workforce. Additionally, we incurred a $3.7 million charge during 2008 for lease-related costs associated with the consolidation of our Corporate headquarters into our Plainview, New York facility, and $0.4 million associated with the termination of a leased facility in Santa Barbara, California, that we vacated during the third quarter.Data Storage segment. Restructuring expense of $6.7$4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, was principally a result2009, consisted primarily of personnel severance costs of $4.9$3.4 million associated with the reduction of approximately 164 employees in our workforce. Additionally, we took a cost reduction plan initiated$1.4 million charge during the second quarter of 2009 for costs associated with vacating a leased facility in Camarillo, California and the related relocation of 27 employees.

        During 2009, the Company recorded a $0.3 million asset impairment charge. The charge was for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage segment.

Interest Expense, net

        Interest expense, net for 2010 was $6.6 million, comprised of $4.7 million in cash interest and $3.5 million in non-cash interest primarily relating to our convertible debt, partially offset by management during 2007$1.6 million in interest income earned on our cash and $1.8short-term investment balances. Interest expense, net for 2009 was $6.9 million, comprised of $4.9 million in cash interest and $2.8 million in non-cash interest, partially offset by $0.8 million in interest income. The non-cash interest expense is related to accounting rules that requires a portion of convertible debt to be allocated to equity in 2010 and 2009 and accretion of debt discounts and amortization of debt premiums related to our short-term investments in 2010.

Income Taxes

        The income tax provision attributable to continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $10.5 million compared to $2.6 million or 22.9% of income before taxes in the prior year. The 2010 provision for income taxes included $8.0 million relating to our foreign operations and $2.5 million relating to our domestic operations. The 2009 provision for income taxes included $1.6 million relating to our foreign operations and $1.0 million relating to our domestic operations. Our effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate as a result of the utilization of our domestic net



operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. It is anticipated that our effective tax rate for 2011 will approach the U.S. statutory rate

Discontinued Operations

        Discontinued operations represent the results of the operations of our disposed Metrology segment which was sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010, reported as discontinued operations. The 2010 results reflect an operational loss before taxes of $0.8 million and a gain on disposal of $156.3 million before taxes.

Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

        The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between 2009 and 2008 (dollars in 000s):

 
 Year ended December 31, Dollar and
Percentage
Change
Year to Year
 
 
 2009 2008 

Net sales

 $282,412  100.0%$314,935  100.0%$(32,523) (10.3)%

Cost of sales

  171,177  60.6  191,664  60.9  (20,487) (10.7)
              

Gross profit

  111,235  39.4  123,271  39.1  (12,036) (9.8)

Operating expenses (income):

                   

Selling, general and administrative

  62,151  22.0  60,542  19.2  1,609  2.7 

Research and development

  43,483  15.4  39,608  12.6  3,875  9.8 

Amortization

  5,168  1.8  8,864  2.8  (3,696) (41.7)

Restructuring

  4,837  1.7  9,424  3.0  (4,587) (48.7)

Asset impairment

  304  0.1  51,387  16.3  (51,083) (99.4)

Other, net

  24    (414) (0.1) 438  * 
              

Total operating expenses

  115,967  41.1  169,411  53.8  (53,444) (31.5)
              

Operating loss

  (4,732) (1.7) (46,140) (14.7) 41,408  (89.7)

Interest expense, net

  6,850  2.4  6,729  2.1  121  1.8 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

      (3,758) (1.2) 3,758  (100.0)
              

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

  (11,582) (4.1) (49,111) (15.6) 37,529  (76.4)

Income tax provision

  2,647  0.9  1,722  0.5  925  53.7 
              

Loss from continuing operations

  (14,229) (5.0) (50,833) (16.1) 36,604  (72.0)

Discontinued operations:

                   
 

Loss from discontinued operations, before income taxes

  (2,703) (1.0) (24,418) (7.8) 21,715  (88.9)
 

Income tax (benefit) provision

  (1,300) (0.5) 170  0.1  (1,470) * 
              

Loss from discontinued operations

  (1,403) (0.5) (24,588) (7.8) 23,185  (94.3)
              

Net loss

  (15,632) (5.5) (75,421) (23.9) 59,789  (79.3)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

  (65)   (230) (0.1) 165  (71.7)
              

Net loss attributable to Veeco

 $(15,567) (5.5)%$(75,191) (23.9)%$59,624  (79.3)%
              

*
Not Meaningful

Net Sales and Orders

        Net sales of $282.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, were down 10.3% compared to 2008. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment and by region (dollars in 000s):

 
 Sales Orders  
  
 
 
 Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Book to Bill Ratio 
 
 2009 2008 Year to Year 2009 2008 Year to Year 2009 2008 

Segment Analysis

                               
 

LED & Solar

 $205,153 $165,812 $39,341  23.7%$440,784 $160,162 $280,622  175.2% 2.15  0.97 
 

Data Storage

  77,259  149,123  (71,864) (48.2) 97,497  138,653  (41,156) (29.7) 1.26  0.93 
                      
 

Total

 $282,412 $314,935 $(32,523) (10.3)%$538,281 $298,815 $239,466  80.1% 1.91  0.95 
                      

Regional Analysis

                               
 

Americas

 $60,730 $130,573 $(69,843) (53.5)%$78,196 $108,172 $(29,976) (27.7)% 1.29  0.83 
                      
 

EMEA

  50,088  57,567  (7,479) (13.0) 47,186  51,731  (4,545) (8.8) 0.94  0.90 
                      
  

Korea

  99,132  8,887  90,245  1,015.5  236,114  15,864  220,250  1,388.4  2.38  1.79 
  

China

  31,114  19,575  11,539  58.9  90,724  32,202  58,522  181.7  2.92  1.65 
  

Taiwan

  13,882  39,124  (25,242) (64.5) 34,642  30,999  3,643  11.8  2.50  0.79 
  

Other Asia Pacific

  27,466  59,209  (31,743) (53.6) 51,419  59,847  (8,428) (14.1) 1.87  1.01 
                      
 

Asia Pacific

  171,594  126,795  44,799  35.3  412,899  138,912  273,987  197.2  2.41  1.10 
                      
 

Total

 $282,412 $314,935 $(32,523) (10.3)%$538,281 $298,815 $239,466  80.1% 1.91  0.95 
                      

        By segment, LED & Solar sales increased 23.7% due to an increase in end user demand for HB LED backlighting applications, higher average selling prices and strong customer acceptance of Veeco's newest generation systems. Offsetting this increase, Data Storage sales were down 48.2%, primarily as a result of a slowdown in capital spending by data storage customers. LED & Solar sales represented 72.6% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2009, up from 52.6% in the prior year. Data Storage sales accounted for 27.4% of net sales, down from 47.4% in the prior year. By region, net sales increased by 35.3% in Asia Pacific, primarily due to MOCVD sales to HB LED customers, while sales in the Americas and EMEA declined 53.5% and 13.0%, respectively.

        Orders in 2009 increased 80.1% compared to 2008, primarily attributable to a 175.2% increase in LED & Solar orders that were principally driven by HB LED manufacturers increasing production for television and laptop backlighting applications and demand for CIGS deposition systems and components. Data Storage orders declined 29.7% from the continued slow down in our customers capital spending.

        Our book-to-bill ratio for 2009 was 1.91 to 1 compared to 0.95 to 1 in 2008. Our backlog as of December 31, 2009 was $377.3 million, compared to $125.6 million as of December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we experienced net backlog adjustments of approximately $4.1 million, consisting of $3.2 million for order cancellations, primarily in the first half of the year, and $0.9 million of costsadjustments related to foreign currency translation. For certain sales arrangements we require a deposit for purchase commitmentsa portion of the sales price before shipment. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 we had deposits and advanced billings of $59.8 million and $16.1 million, respectively.

Gross Profit

        Gross profit increased to $111.2 million or 39.4% in 2009 compared to $123.3 million or 39.1% in 2008. Despite the overall $32.5 million decrease in sales, gross margin remained flat, primarily due to the favorable impact of significant cost reductions from a reduced workforce, lower facilities costs associated with closing and consolidating facilities and the outsourcing of certain Data Storage product manufacturing to Asia. LED & Solar gross margins increased from 38.3% in the prior year to 40.4%,



primarily due to the impact of our lower fixed cost structure and a 23.7% increase in sales volume as well as favorable pricing and higher margins on new MOCVD products. Data Storage gross margins decreased from 40.2% in the prior year to 36.6% mainly due to decreased sales volume partially offset by reduced costs due to our expense reduction plans compared to the prior year. Data Storage gross margins were also negatively impacted by a charge to cost of sales of $1.5 million during 2009 for the write off of inventory associated with discontinued legacy product lines.

Operating Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.6 million or 2.7%, from the prior year primarily due to the ramp-up in our MOCVD business in the second half of 2009. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 22.0% of net sales in 2009, compared with 19.2% of net sales in the prior year.

        Research and development expense increased $3.9 million or 9.8% from the prior year, primarily due to investments in areas that we believe are higher-growth end market opportunities, particularly in our LED & Solar segment. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense increased to 15.4% from 12.6% in the prior year.

        Amortization expense decreased $3.7 million or 41.7% from the prior year. This decrease is mainly due to certain intangibles in LED & Solar being fully amortized at the end of 2008 as well as the write-off of purchased technology in Data Storage in connection with the asset impairment charges recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

        Restructuring expense of $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, consisted primarily of personnel severance costs of $3.4 million associated with the reduction of approximately 164 employees in our workforce. Additionally, we took a $1.4 million charge during 2009 for costs associated with vacating a leased facility in Camarillo, California, during the second quarter and the related relocation of 27 employees.

        During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $0.3 million asset impairment charge. The charge was for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage reporting unit. During 2008, the Company recorded a $73.3$51.4 million asset impairment charge, of which $73.0$51.1 million was recorded during the fourth quarter and $0.3 million was recorded during the first quarter. The fourth quarter charge consisted of $52.3$30.4 million related to goodwill, $19.6 million related to intangible assets and $1.1 million in property, plant and equipment, as more fully described below.equipment. The first quarter charge consisted of $0.3 million associated with property and equipment abandoned as part of the consolidation of our Corporatecorporate headquarters into our Plainview facility. Asset impairment charges

Interest Expense, net

        Interest expense, net for 2009 was $6.9 million, comprised of $1.1$4.9 million incurred during 2007 were attributablein cash interest and $2.8 million in non-cash interest relating to our convertible debt, partially offset by $0.8 million in interest income earned on our cash and short-term investment balances. Interest expense, net for 2008 was $6.7 million, comprised of $6.4 million in cash interest and $2.9 million in non-cash interest, partially offset by $2.6 million in interest income. The non-cash interest expense in both years is related to accounting rules that requires a portion of convertible debt to be allocated to equity. The decrease of $1.5 million in cash interest expense from the prior year was primarily due to the write-offrepayment of certain property and equipment associated with the discontinued product lines.

        In accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarters of 2008 and 2007, using October 1st as our measurement date, and utilizing a discounted future cash flow approach as described in the Application of Critical Accounting Policies section that follows. This was consistent with the approach used in previous years. Based upon the results of such assessments, we determined that no goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment existed in any$25.3 million of our reporting units, as of October 1, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, the economic downturn became more significant and wide ranging as credit availability tightened and overall business and economic conditions deteriorated. It became apparent that the revenue, profitability, growth and other assumptions we used in its fair value determination at October 1, 2008, required revisions. Additionally, we realized a significant decline in our market capitalization which resulted in the carrying value of our net assets exceeding our market capitalization. Given these factors we were required to perform an interim goodwill impairment assessment as of December 31, 2008.

        In performing the impairment assessment as of December 31, 2008, we updated our financial forecast and growth rate assumptions based upon current market conditions and determined that the carrying amounts of our Data Storage Process Equipment and AFM reporting units were in excess of their respective estimated fair values. As such, we were required to allocate the estimated fair value to all assets and liabilities in these two reporting units and determined there was no implied value related to goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets. We recorded an asset impairment charge of $52.3 millionconvertible notes in the fourth quarter of 2008 relating to goodwill, which consisted of $30.4 million in our Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit and $21.9 million in our AFM reporting unit, and recorded a charge of $5.0 million in our Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit relating to indefinite-lived intangible assets, pertaining to trademarks.

        In accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we performed an analysis as of December 31, 2008 of our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets due to impairment indicators noted during the fourth quarter of 2008, pertaining to its Data Storage Process Equipment and AFM reporting units. Indications of impairment included deteriorating economic conditions, reduced orders, reduced revenue projections, losses in its AFM reporting unit and a significant reduction in our market capitalization. No impairment indicators were present in the other two reporting units. For the purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, a long-lived asset or assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which



identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For the Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit the long-lived assets were grouped at one level below the reporting unit and at the reporting unit level for AFM. The recoverability of long-lived asset groups was measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by such assets. Developing the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows requires significant judgment and projection of future financial performance, including projection of future revenue and expenses, working capital requirements and the time period in which the assets will be utilized. We used the economic life of the primary asset in the long-lived asset group to determine the forecast period of the future cash flows. For the AFM reporting unit, we analyzed long-lived assets with a carrying value of $27.8 million (consisting of $16.6 million of property, plant and equipment and $11.2 million of intangible assets principally patent defense and capitalized software costs) at December 31, 2008 for impairment and determined that no impairment existed. For the Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit, we analyzed long-lived assets with a carrying value of $38.6 million at December 31, 2008 for impairment and determined that no impairment existed for one of the identifiable long-lived asset groups with a carrying value of $12.8 million (consisting principally of property, plant and equipment). Since the carrying amount of long-lived assets within the other identifiable asset group exceeded the estimated future cash flows of such assets, an impairment existed. This long-lived asset group consists of intangible assets of $24.0 million (primarily purchased technology) and $1.8 million of property, plant and equipment pertaining to its mechanical processing product line of Saws and Lappers. The amount of the impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of the long-lived asset group to the carrying value. As permitted under SFAS 144 we determined the fair value of our long-lived asset groups utilizing a discounted cash flow approach applying a risk free interest rate. The carrying value of the long-lived assets exceeded the fair value by $15.7, million which was recorded as an impairment charge and was allocated on a pro rata basis to the long-lived assets with $14.6 million allocated to intangible assets and $1.1 million allocated to property, plant and equipment. We currently expect to recover the remaining carrying value of the asset group of $10.1 million by cash flows generated by the use of the assets over their remaining useful life.

Interest Expense and Interest Income

        Interest expense for 2008 decreased by $0.6 million from the prior year, primarily due to the repurchase of our convertible subordinated notes.2008. Interest income decreased by $1.4$1.7 million due principally to the lower interest rate yields on cash balances invested during 20082009 compared to the prior year.


Gain on Extinguishment of Debt

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, we repurchasedmade two repurchases of $12.2 million in aggregate principal amount of our convertible subordinated notes for $7.2 million in cash, of which $7.1 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest, reducing the amount outstanding from $117.8 million to $105.6 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of approximately $5.0$3.8 million.

        During 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of our convertible subordinated notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. The repurchase amount was $55.1 million in cash, of which $54.8 million related to principal and $0.3 million related to accrued interest. As a result of this repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of approximately $0.7 million. There were no repurchases during 2009.

Income Taxes

        The income tax provision attributable to continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $1.9$2.6 million compared to $3.7$1.7 million in the prior year. The 20082009 provision for income taxes included $1.5$1.6 million relating to our



foreign operations which continue to be profitable, and $0.4$1.0 million relating to our domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carry forwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, our domestic operations are not expected to incur significant federal income taxes foruntil such time as the foreseeable future. The 2007 provision for income taxes included $2.2 million relating to our foreign operations and $1.5 million relating to our domestic operations.net operating losses are utilized.

Noncontrolling InterestDiscontinued Operations

        Noncontrolling interest was a credit to income of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and a credit of $0.6 million in the prior year. As we are the primary beneficiary of Fluens, a variable interest entity, we are required to consolidate Fluens and eliminate the portion of its results attributable to noncontrolling interests. As a result, we eliminate from our net loss 80.1% of Fluens' operating losses.

Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

        The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between 2007 and 2006 (dollars in 000s):

 
 Year ended
December 31,
  
  
 
 
 Dollar and
Percentage
Change
Year to Year
 
 
 2007 2006 

Net sales

 $402,475  100.0%$441,034  100.0%$(38,559) (8.7)%

Cost of sales

  244,964  60.9  246,910  56.0  (1,946) (0.8)
              

Gross profit

  157,511  39.1  194,124  44.0  (36,613) (18.9)

Operating expenses:

                   
 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

  90,972  22.6  93,110  21.1  (2,138) (2.3)
 

Research and development expense

  61,174  15.2  61,925  14.0  (751) (1.2)
 

Amortization expense

  10,250  2.5  16,045  3.6  (5,795) (36.1)
 

Restructuring expense

  6,726  1.7    0.0  6,726  100.0 
 

Asset impairment charge

  1,068  0.3    0.0  1,068  100.0 
 

Write-off of purchased in-process technology

    0.0  1,160  0.3  (1,160) (100.0)
 

Other income, net

  (618) (0.2) (572) (0.1) 46  8.0 
              

Total operating expenses

  169,572  42.1  171,668  38.9  (2,096) (1.2)
              

Operating (loss) income

  (12,061) (3.0) 22,456  5.1  (34,517) 153.7 

Interest expense

  6,976  1.7  9,194  2.1  (2,218) (24.1)

Interest income

  (3,963) (1.0) (4,926) (1.1) (963) (19.5)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

  (738) (0.1) (330) (0.1) 408  123.6 
              

(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  (14,336) (3.6) 18,518  4.2  (32,854) (177.4)

Income tax provision

  3,651  0.9  4,959  1.1  (1,308) (26.4)

Noncontrolling interest

  (628) (0.2) (1,358) (0.3) (730) (53.8)
              

Net (loss) income

 $(17,359) (4.3)%$14,917  3.4%$(32,276) (216.4)%
              

Net Sales and Orders

        Net sales of $402.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 were down 8.7%, compared to 2006. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment and by region (dollars in 000s):

 
 Sales Orders  
  
 
 
 Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Year ended December 31, Dollar and Percentage Change Book to Bill Ratio 
 
 2007 2006 Year to Year 2007 2006 Year to Year 2007 2006 

Segment Analysis

                               
 

LED & Solar Process Equipment

 $115,863 $94,165 $21,697  23.0%$163,970 $120,123 $43,847  36.5% 1.42  1.28 
 

Data Storage Process Equipment

  136,169  174,713  (38,543) (22.1) 141,663  194,602  (52,939) (27.2) 1.04  1.11 
 

Metrology

  150,443  172,156  (21,713) (12.6) 145,939  179,077  (33,138) (18.5) 0.97  1.04 
                      
 

Total

 $402,475 $441,034 $(38,559) (8.7)%$451,572 $493,802 $(42,230) (8.6)% 1.12  1.12 
                      

Regional Analysis

                               
 

Americas

 $130,500 $151,686 $(21,186) (14.0)%$150,748 $169,536 $(18,788) (11.1)% 1.16  1.12 
 

EMEA

  77,985  69,310  8,675  12.5  106,178  65,988  40,190  60.9  1.36  0.95 
 

Japan

  55,815  57,241  (1,426) (2.5) 48,764  60,523  (11,759) (19.4) 0.87  1.06 
 

Asia Pacific

  138,175  162,797  (24,622) (15.1) 145,882  197,755  (51,873) (26.2) 1.06  1.21 
                      
 

Total

 $402,475 $441,034 $(38,559) (8.7)%$451,572 $493,802 $(42,230) (8.6)% 1.12  1.12 
                      

        By segment, Data Storage Process Equipment sales were down 22.1%, primarily due to a decrease in sales to customers in the data storage industry due to reduced requirements for capacity purchases in 2007. Metrology sales decreased 12.6%, primarily due to decreased purchases of automated AFM products in the semiconductor market and optical metrology products in the data storage market. Partially offsetting these declines was an increase of 23.0% in sales in the LED & Solar Process Equipment segment, resulting primarily from the increase in end user demand due to expanding applications for HB-LEDs. LED & Solar Process Equipment sales represented 28.8% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2007, up from 21.4% in the prior year period. Data Storage Process Equipment sales accounted for 33.8% of net sales, down from 39.6% in the prior year period. Metrology sales accounted for 37.4% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2007, down from 39.0% in the prior year period. By region, net sales increased by 12.5% in EMEA, while sales in Asia-Pacific and the Americas declined 15.1% and 14.0%, respectively. We believe that there will continue to be period-to-period variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

        Orders in 2007 decreased 8.6% compared to 2006. The decrease was caused by a 27.2% decrease in Data Storage Process Equipment orders due primarily from a reduction in customer demand in the data storage industry, as well as an 18.5% decrease in Metrology orders due to a decrease in orders for automated AFM products, principally to semiconductor customers and a decrease in orders for optical metrology products, principally to data storage customers. These declines were offset by an increase of 36.5% in LED & Solar Process Equipment orders due to an increase in purchases in the HB-LED and solar markets.

        Our book-to-bill ratio for 2007, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was 1.12, which is consistent with the comparable 2006 period. Our backlog as of December 31, 2007 was $173.5 million, compared to $140.8 million as of December 31, 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we experienced backlog adjustments of approximately $16.4 million, driven by order cancellations from data storage customers for products that we discontinued. Due to changing business conditions and customer requirements, we may continue to experience cancellations and/or rescheduling of orders.


Gross Profit

        Gross profit for 2007 was 39.1%, compared to 44.0% in the comparable prior year period. Data Storage Process Equipment gross margin decreased from 44.1% in the prior year to 34.7% primarily due to a 22.1% decline in sales volume, as well as an unfavorable product mix. Gross margin was also negatively impacted by a charge of $4.8 million for the write-off of inventory associated with certain discontinued data storage product lines. Metrology gross margins decreased to 44.1% from 51.5% in 2006, principally due to lower sales volume of automated AFM and optical metrology products and less favorable product mix in AFM products sold to scientific and research customers. However, these decreases were offset by a significant improvement in gross margin for LED & Solar Process Equipment products due to an increase in sales volume, as well as favorable product mix and pricing.

Operating Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $2.1 million, primarily attributable to a decrease in bonus, profit sharing, and commission expenses related to the reduction in domestic sales, as well as reduced legal fees. The decrease was offset by an increase in non-cash compensation expense related to stock options and restricted shares, and an increase in executive stay and sign-on bonuses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 22.6% of sales in 2007, compared with 21.1% of sales in the prior year period.

        Research and development expense decreased $0.8 million from the comparable prior year period, primarily due to prior year product development efforts for Data Storage Process Equipment products that were introduced during 2007. As a percentage of sales, research and development expense increased to 15.2% from 14.0% in the prior year period.

        Amortization expense decreased by $5.8 million from the prior year due to certain technology-based intangibles becoming fully amortized during 2007.

        Restructuring expense of $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 was principally a result of personnel severance costs of $4.9 million associated with a cost reduction plan initiated by management during 2007. Additionally, we incurred $1.8 million of costs for purchase commitments associated with certain discontinued product lines. No such restructuring expenses were recorded in the prior year period.

        Asset impairment charges of $1.1 million incurred during 2007 were attributable to the write-off of certain property and equipment associated with the discontinued product lines. No such asset impairment charges were recorded in the prior year period.

        During the third quarter of 2006, we finalized the purchase accounting for our acquisition of 19.9% of the stock of Fluens, and determined that Fluens is a variable interest entity and that we are its primary beneficiary. Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by a Senior Vice President of our Company. As such, we have consolidatedDiscontinued operations represent the results of Fluens'the operations from the acquisition date, and have attributed the 80.1% portion that is not owned by Veeco to noncontrolling interest inof our consolidated financial statements. As part of this acquisition accounting, we recorded $1.2 million of in-process technology,disposed Metrology segment, which was written off during the third quarter of 2006. No such costs were recorded during 2007.

Interest Expense and Interest Income

        Interest expense for 2007 decreased by $2.2 million from the prior year period, duesold to the early extinguishment of $56.0 million of our convertible subordinated notes during 2007 (see below). Interest income decreased by $1.0 million due to lower average cash balances invested during 2007.


GainBruker on Extinguishment of Debt

        During 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of our convertible subordinated notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. The repurchase amount was $55.1 million in cash, of which $54.8 million related to principal and $0.3 million related to accrued interest. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.7 million. In the comparable 2006 period, we repurchased $20.0 million of our convertible subordinated notes reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3 million.

Income Taxes

        The income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $3.7 million compared to $5.0 million in the prior year. The 2007 provision for income taxes included $2.2 million relating to our foreign operations, which continue to be profitable, and $1.5 million relating to our domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carry forwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, our domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future. The 2006 provision for income taxes included $3.6 million relating to our foreign operations and $1.4 million relating to our domestic operations.

Noncontrolling Interest

        Noncontrolling interest was a credit to income of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and a credit of $1.4 million in the comparable prior year period. As we are the primary beneficiary of Fluens, a variable interest entity, we are required to consolidate Fluens and eliminate the portion of its results attributable to noncontrolling interests. As a result, we eliminate from our net income 80.1% of Fluens' operating losses. The credit in the prior comparable period includes the elimination of 80.1% of the write-off of in-process technology recorded in the third quarter of 2006.October 7, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Historically, our principal capital requirements have included the funding of acquisitions, capital expenditures and the repayment of debt. We traditionally have generated cash from operations and debt and stock issuances. Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations is dependent on the continued demand for our products and services.

        Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 20082010 was $103.8$245.1 million. This amount represents a decreasean increase of $13.3$96.6 million from December 31, 2007.2009. We also had short-term investments and restricted cash of $394.2 million and $76.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010. A summary of the current periodyear cash flow activity is as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Net loss

 $(71,063)$(17,359)
      

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $44,264 $39,185 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (23,684) (8,780)

Net cash used in financing activities

  (32,997) (59,484)

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

  (867) (884)
      

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

  (13,284) (29,963)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  117,083  147,046 
      

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $103,799 $117,083 
      


 
 Year ended
December 31,
 
 
 2010 2009 

Net income (loss)

 $361,760 $(15,632)
      

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $194,214 $59,038 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (121,621) (154,765)

Net cash provided by financing activities

  25,505  141,869 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

  (1,466) (163)
      

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  96,632  45,979 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  148,500  102,521 
      

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $245,132 $148,500 
      

        Cash provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 20082010 was $44.3$194.2 million compared to $39.2$59.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.2009. The $44.3$194.2 million cash provided by operations in 2010 included adjustments to the $71.1$361.8 million of net lossincome for non-cash items, which primarilyreduced the cash provided by net income by $168.3 million. The adjustments consisted of a non-cash asset impairment charge$12.9 million of $73.3 million, depreciation and amortization, $9.6 million of $25.1 million, non-cash stock-basedequity-based compensation expense, $3.1 million of $10.5amortization of debt discount, $(25.1) million and a non-cash inventory write-off of $2.9deferred income taxes, $(23.3) million partially offset by a $5.0of excess tax benefits from stock option exercises, $(156.3) million netof gain on early extinguishmentdisposal of long-term debt.our


Metrology segment and $10.0 million of discontinued operations. Net cash provided by operations was favorably impacted by a net $7.3$0.7 million increase fromof changes in operating assets and liabilities, which included a decreasean $83.2 million increase in accounts receivable, of $20.1a $49.5 million increase in inventories, due to a reductionthe significant increase in sales and an improvementorders in days sales outstanding during the fourth quarter of 2008 asour LED & Solar segment compared to 2009, a $23.3 million increase in supplier deposits and a $5.5 million increase in discontinued operations, partially offset by an $85.5 million increase in accrued expenses, principally resulting from customer deposits associated primarily with the fourth quarter of 2007. We currently expect to incur charges of between $5.0significant increase in orders in our LED & Solar segment and a $78.9 million and $6.0 million relating to restructuring activities during the first quarter of 2009 for personnel severance, retention bonuses and lease commitments, which will require the use of cash. Payments on the $5.2 million restructuring reserve as of December 31, 2008 will be made over the next twelve to eighteen months, principally for personnel severance and lease-related obligations.increase in income taxes payable. Cash provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 2007,2009 was $39.2 million. This$59.0 million and included adjustments to the $17.4$15.6 million net loss for non-cash items, which includedprimarily consisted of $13.9 million of depreciation and amortization, $7.5 million of $25.0 million, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, of $5.6 million and $5.9$2.8 million of amortization of debt discount, a $1.5 million non-cash charges associated with restructuringinventory write-off and asset impairment, partially offset$8.8 million of discontinued operations. Net cash provided by operations in 2009 was favorably impacted by a net $21.2$40.1 million increase fromof changes in operating assets and liabilities. Due to the current global economic crisis, we cannot assure timely receipt of accounts receivable, due to cash constraints on our customers. As of December 31, 2008, we are not aware of any specific uncollectible accounts resulting from the current economic uncertainties and believe that related reserves are adequate to cover the uncertainties that exist.

        Cash used in investing activities of $23.7$121.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, resulted primarily from $506.1 million of purchases of short-term investments, $10.7 million of capital expenditures, $76.1 million of transfers to restricted cash and $0.5 million of discontinued operations, partially offset by proceeds of $33.0 million from the sale of short-term investments, $225.2 million net proceeds from the disposal of our Metrology segment and $213.6 million from the maturity of CDAR's. Cash used in investing activities of $154.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, resulted primarily from $135.0 million of purchases of short-term investments, $7.5 million of capital expenditures, $0.9 million of $12.8discontinued operations, $9.8 million of earn-out payments to the former owners of businesses acquired and $2.4 million for certain acquisitions, partially offset by $0.8 million of proceeds from the acquisitionsale of Mill Lane for $11.0 million.property, plant and equipment.

        Cash used in investingprovided by financing activities of $8.8$25.5 million forduring the year ended December 31, 2007, resulted2010, consisted primarily of $45.2 million of cash proceeds from capital expenditures of $9.1stock option exercises and $23.3 million excess tax benefits from stock options exercises, partially offset by other items. In 2009, we currently expect to invest approximately $9.5$4.6 million in total capital expenditures primarily related to lab tools for high-growth opportunities, with particular emphasis on LED & Solar and new applications for Metrology instruments.

        Cash used in financing activities of $33.0 million in 2008 primarily consisted of cash used to pay the remaining outstanding convertible subordinated "Old Notes" (as defined below) for $25.2 million in cash and to repurchase $12.2 million in aggregate principal amount of our convertible subordinated "New Notes" (as defined below) for $7.2 million in cash. In addition, restricted stock tax withholdings, $38.1 million of $1.0purchases of treasury stock and $0.2 million requiredof repayments of long-term debt. Cash provided by financing activities of $141.9 million during the useyear ended December 31, 2009, consisted primarily of $130.1 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock through a secondary public offering and $12.6 million from stock option exercises partially offset by $0.7$0.6 million of proceeds fromrestricted stock issuances. Cash used in financing activities of $59.5 million in 2007 primarily consisted of cash used in the repurchase of $56.0tax withholdings and $0.2 million of our outstanding convertible subordinatedrepayments of long-term debt.

        As of December 31, 2010 we had notes for $55.1of $105.6 million in cash, as discussed below, as well as a balloon payment of $5.2 million made to satisfy the mortgage on our Santa Barbara, California facility. In addition, there were payments of debt issuance costs of $1.6 million associated with our New Notes and a revolving credit facility we entered into in August 2007 and amended in February 2009 (discussed below). This was partially offset by $3.2 million of proceeds from common stock issuances resulting from the exercise of employee stock options and the purchase of shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

        On December 21, 2001, we issued $200.0 million of unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinatedprincipal amount outstanding. The notes due December 2008 ("Old Notes"), and on January 3, 2002, we issued an additional $20.0 million of Old Notes pursuant to the exercise of an over-allotment option. The Old Notes were convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $38.51 per share. We paid interest on the Old Notes on June 21 and December 21 of each year.


        During 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of Old Notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded a net gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.3 million in 2006. During 2007, we repurchased an additional $56.0 million of Old Notes, reducing the amount of Old Notes outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million in 2007.

        During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the Old Notes. The New Notes bearaccrue interest at 4.125% per annum and mature on April 15, 2012. Under these agreements, such holders agreedThe notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, since we have the ability and the intent to exchange $118.8 million aggregatesettle the principal amount of Old Notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregatethe notes in cash. Under the terms of the notes, we may pay the principal amount of New Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 millionconverted notes in cash or in shares of Old Notes remained outstanding. A gross gain of approximately $1.0 million was recorded on the exchange transactions offset by the write-off of approximately $1.0 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Old Notes.common stock. We intend to pay such amounts in cash.

        The New Notesnotes are initially convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of New Notesnotes (equivalent to a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007). On or after April 20, 2011, we may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and the conversion premium in shares of our common stock plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. Holders may convert the New Notesnotes at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including our common stock trading at prices equal to or above 130% overof the conversion price for at least 20 trading days during the final 30 trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, our common stock was trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for the specified period and, as a specified period.result, the convertible notes are convertible during the first quarter of 2011. If the



convertible notes are converted, we have the ability and intent to pay the principal balance of notes tendered for conversion in cash. We will re-perform this test each quarter up to and including the fourth quarter of 2011. Accordingly, the balance of the convertible notes at December 31, 2010 has been classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. On February 14, 2011, at the option of the holder, $7.5 million of notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $45.95 per share in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2011 we will take a charge for the related unamortized debt discount totaling $0.3 million. We pay interest on these notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The New Notesnotes are unsecured and are effectively subordinated to all of our senior and secured indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, we paid off the remaining $25.2 million of Old Notes outstanding. In addition, we repurchased $12.2 million in aggregate principal amount of our New Notes for $7.2 million in cash, of which $7.1 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest, reducing the amount outstanding from $117.8 million to $105.6 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of approximately $5.0 million.

        In February 2009, we entered into an amendment to our existing credit agreement with HSBC Bank USA, National Association ("HSBC"), as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"). As part of the amendment, we reduced the amount of the revolving credit facility, modified certain existing covenants and added certain new covenants. In addition, the commitment fees and interest rate were increased. As amended, the Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit borrowings of up to $30.0 million. The annual interest rate under the Credit Agreement is a floating rate equal to the prime rate of the agent bank plus 2.0%. A LIBOR-based interest rate option is also provided. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements. The Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants which include the maintenance of minimum cash balances and limitations with respect to incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of dividends, long-term leases, investments, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and sales of assets. In addition, under the Credit Agreement, we are required to satisfy certain financial tests, including minimum profitability levels. As of the effective date of the amendment, we were in compliance with all covenants. Substantially all of our assets and those of our material domestic subsidiaries, other than real estate, have been pledged to secure our obligations under the Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2012. In the first quarter of 2009, we will recognize an expense of $0.2 million representing the amount of deferred financing fees equal to the portion of the revolving credit facility which was terminated in connection with the amendment. As of December 31, 20082010, we had $76.1 million of restricted cash consisting of $22.9 million that relates to the proceeds received from the sale of our Metrology segment. This cash is held in escrow and 2007, there were no borrowings outstanding underis restricted from use for one year from the Credit Agreementclosing date of the transaction to secure any losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and letterscovenants we made in the stock purchase agreement and related documents. Additionally, we also had restricted cash consisting of credit outstanding were approximately $0.4 million. Interest expense associated with$53.2 million which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance that the Credit Agreement recorded during 2008Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is held in custody by the issuing bank, and 2007 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.


        AtAs of December 31, 2008,2010, our contractual cash obligations and commitments are as follows (in thousands):

 
 Payments due by period 
Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments
 Total Less than
1 year
 1-3 years 3-5 years More than
5 years
 

Long-term debt(1)

 $108,865 $196 $441 $106,090 $2,138 

Interest on debt(1)

  16,162  4,608  9,167  1,833  554 

Operating leases(2)

  9,370  5,149  3,578  558  85 

Letters of credit and bank guarantees(3)

  669  669       

Purchase commitments(4)

  27,724  27,724       

Earn-out payments(5)

  9,600  9,600       
            

 $172,390 $47,946 $13,186 $108,481 $2,777 
            

 
 Payments due by period 
Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments
 Total Less than
1 year
 1-3 years 3-5 years More than
5 years
 

Long-term debt(1)

 $108,457 $105,803 $516 $604 $1,534 

Interest on debt(1)

  6,976  4,575  1,833  298  270 

Operating leases(2)

  9,464  3,915  4,083  1,236  230 

Letters of credit and bank guarantees(3)

  136,315  136,315       

Purchase commitments(4)

  200,296  200,296       
            

 $461,508 $450,904 $6,432 $2,138 $2,034 
            

(1)
Long-term debt obligations consist of repayment of our convertible subordinated notes and related interest, as well as mortgage and interest payments for our St. Paul, MN facility.

(2)
WeIn accordance with relevant accounting guidance, we account for our office leases as operating leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13,Accounting for Leases,with expiration dates ranging from 20092010 through 2012.2017. There are future minimum annual rental payments required under the leases. Leasehold improvements made at the beginning of or during a lease are amortized over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets.

(3)
Issued by our lendera bank on our behalf as needed. $0.4 million ofWe had letters of credit can be drawn against our revolving credit agreementoutstanding of $0.2 million and $0.3bank guarantees outstanding of $135.8 million, of bank guaranteeswhich, $83.2 million can be drawn against lines of credit in our foreign subsidiaries.subsidiaries and $52.6 million that is collateralized against cash that is restricted from use.

(4)
Purchase commitments are primarily for inventory used in manufacturing our products. It has been our practice not to enter into purchase commitments extending beyond one year.

(5)
During 2008, we acquired Mill Lane for $11.0 million, net of cash acquired, plus potential future earn-out payments of up to $19.0 million, contingent upon the future achievement of certain operating performance criteria. As of December 31, 2008, we have accrued $9.6 million in earn-out payments earned through the end of the fourth quarter of 2008. Payment for these earn-outs will be made in the first quarter of 2009. We believe we will be able to meet our obligation to pay these earn-out amounts to Mill Lane from the sources referred to above. The Company is potentially liable for additional earn-out payments of up to $9.4 million which could be earned in 2009 and would be payable in January 2010. It is not possible to estimate the amount, if any, that may be due to the former owners of Mill Lane.

        We believe that existing cash balances and short-term investments together with cash generated from operations and amounts available under our credit agreement will be sufficient to meet our projected working capital and other cash flow requirements for the next twelve months, as well as our contractual obligations, detailed in the above table. We believe we will be able to meet our obligation to repay the $105.6 million subordinated notes that mature on April 15, 2012 with available cash and short-term investments or, if necessary, through a combination of conversion of the notes outstanding, refinancing, cash generated from operations and other means.

        In 2006, we invested $0.5 million to purchase 19.9% of the common stock of Fluens. Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Veeco and Fluens have jointly developed a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications. If this development is successful and upon the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, we will be obligated to purchase the balance of the outstanding stock of Fluens for $3.5 million plus an earn-out payment to Fluens' other stockholders based on future performance. In



addition, until May 2009 Veeco may elect to waive these conditions and purchase the remaining 80.1% of outstanding stock of Fluens on the same terms.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.resources other than operating leases, letters of credit and bank guarantees, and purchase commitments disclosed in the preceding "Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments" table.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

        General:    Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management continually monitors and evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible and other long-lived assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs, and contingent liabilities, including potential litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, short-term investments, the valuation of inventories, the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the impairment of long-lived assets, fair value measurements, warranty costs, the accounting for income taxes and share-basedequity-based compensation to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved in each.

        Revenue Recognition:    We recognize revenue based on current accounting guidance provided inby the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff("SEC") and the Financial Accounting Bulletin No. 104,Revenue Recognition.Standards Board ("FASB"). Our revenue transactions include sales of products under multiple-element arrangements. Revenue under these arrangements is allocated to each element based upon its estimated fair market value, in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.value.

        We consider a broad array of facts and circumstances when evaluating each of our sales arrangements in determining when to recognize revenue, including specific terms of the purchase order, contractual obligations to the customer, the complexity of the customer's post deliverypost-delivery acceptance provisions, customer creditworthiness and the installation process. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,Management also considers the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectibility is reasonably assuredparty responsible for installation, whether there are process specification requirements which need to be demonstrated before final sign off and no uncertainties exist regarding customer acceptance. For transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either atpayment, whether Veeco can replicate the time of shipment or delivery,field testing conditions and procedures in our contractual arrangementsfactory and our past experience with customers do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions.demonstrating and installing a particular system. Sales arrangements are reviewed on a case-by-case basis; however, our products generally fall into one of two categories; either instruments or systems, for which we have establishedthe Company's revenue recognition protocolsprotocol for established systems is as described below.

        Instruments—Standard products produced according to our published specifications, principally metrology instruments sold typically to universities, research facilities and scientific centers and in general industrial applications where installation is inconsequential or perfunctory and no substantive customer acceptance provisions exist, revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, either at time of shipment or delivery. Acceptance of the product by the customer is based upon meeting standard published specifications. Customer acceptance provisions include initial setup at the customer site, performance of functional test procedures and calibration testing of the basic features and functionality of the product. These provisions are a replication of the testing performed in



our facilities prior to shipment. The skills and equipment required to complete installation of such instruments are not specialized and are readily available in the market and are often performed by distributors or representative organizations.

        Systems—Process equipment systems and certain metrology systems, which are sold to manufacturers in the LED, solar, data storage and semiconductor industries and are used in manufacturing facilities and commercial production environments typically include process acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. We are generally required to install these products and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer's facility. Generally, based upon the terms of the sales arrangement, these products are sold with a retention (typically 10% to 20% of the sales contract value) which is payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance is completed. Such installations are not considered complex and are not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment because they do not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complex interfaces or connections. Installation normally represents only 2% - 4% of the fair value of the sales contract. Sales arrangements for these systems are accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-21, as the Company bifurcates transactions into separate units of accounting or elements based on objective evidence of fair value. The two elements are the system and installation of the system. The amount of revenue allocated to each element is based upon its relative fair value. The price charged when the system or installation service is sold separately generally determines fair value. The value of the installation service is based upon the fair value of the service performed, including labor, which is based upon the estimated time to complete the installation at hourly rates, and material components. We recognize revenue for the system or delivered element since the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis, there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item (i.e., the installation service) and delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control, based on our historical experience. The value of the undelivered element is the greater of the fair value of the installation or the portion of the sales price that will not be received until the installation is completed (i.e., the retention amount).        System revenue is generally recognized upon shipment or delivery provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer.customer, evidence of an arrangement exists, prices are contractually fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and there are no material uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. Revenue from installation services is recognized at the time acceptance is



received from the customer. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales arrangement is deferred until the criteria have been met or all elements have been delivered to the customer or been completed.

        For those transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either at the time of shipment or delivery, our sales and contractual arrangements with customers do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions. In the rare instances where such provisions are included, the Company defers all revenue until customer acceptance is achieved. In cases where products are sold with a retention of 10% to 20%, which is typically payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance provisions are completed, the customer has the right to withhold this payment until such provisions have been achieved. We defer the greater of the retention amount or the fair value of the installation on systems that we recognize revenue at the time of shipment or delivery.

        For new products, new applications of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting customeragreed upon specifications at the customer site, revenue is deferred as deferred profit in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and fully recognized upon completion of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance. Since title

        Our systems are principally sold to goodsmanufacturers in the HB-LED, the data storage and solar industries. Sales arrangements for these systems generally passesinclude customer acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. Prior to shipment a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning within agreed upon shipmentspecifications. Such source inspection or delivery and 80%test data replicates the acceptance testing that will be performed at the customer's site prior to 90%final acceptance of the contract amount becomes payable at that time, inventory is relievedsystem. Customer acceptance provisions include reassembly and accounts receivable is recognized forinstallation of the amount billedsystem at the timecustomer site, which includes performing functional or mechanical test procedures (i.e. hardware checks, leak testing, gas flow monitoring and quality control checks of shipment. The profit on the amount billed forbasic features of the product.) Additionally, a material demonstration process may be performed to validate the functionality of the product. Upon meeting the agreed upon specifications the customer approves final acceptance of the product.

        Veeco generally is required to install these transactionsproducts and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer's facility. Such installations typically are not considered complex and the installation process is deferrednot deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment because it does not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complex interfaces or connections. We have a demonstrated history of completing such installations in a timely, consistent manner and recognized as deferred profitcan reliably estimate the costs of such. In such cases, the test environment at our facilities prior to shipment replicates the customer's environment. While there are others in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.industry with sufficient knowledge about the installation process for our systems as a practical matter, most customers engage the Company to perform the installation services.

        In Japan, generally where our contractual terms with customers generally specify risk of loss and title transfers upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon receipt of written customer acceptance.

        Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term. Component and spare part revenue is recognized at the time of shipment or delivery in accordance with the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

        Short-Term Investments:    We determine the appropriate balance sheet classification of our investments at the time of purchase and evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These securities include FDIC insured corporate bonds, treasury bills, commercial



paper and CDARS with maturities of greater than three months when purchased in principal amounts that, when aggregated with interest to accrue over the term, will not exceed FDIC limits. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income (loss) and reported in equity. Net realized gains and losses are included in net income (loss) attributable to Veeco.

Inventory Valuation:    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials,



work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts and other service inventory. Obsolete or slow-moving inventory, based upon historical usage, or inventory in excess of management's estimated usage for the next 12 month's requirements is written-down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management's estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of excess inventory.

        Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment:    The Company accounts fordoes not amortize goodwill andor intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, in accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized, but instead testedtests the balances in these asset accounts for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets.

        Pursuant to SFAS 142relevant accounting pronouncements we are required to determine if it is appropriate to use the operating segment as defined under SFAS 131accounting guidance as the reporting unit or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified fourtwo reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment. The reporting units are Data Storage Process Equipment, LED & Solar Process Equipment, AFM and Optical Metrology. AFM and Optical Metrology comprise the Metrology operating segment.Data Storage. In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

        We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to the Company's adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

        If the carrying value of the reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

        Definite-Lived Intangible and Long-Lived Asset Impairment:Assets:    Intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of the core proprietary manufacturing



technologies associated with the products and offerings obtained through acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks and covenants not-to-compete are initially recorded at fair value and software licenses and deferred financing costs are initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods ranging from 2 years to 17 years.

        Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

        Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flowsflow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment



charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

        Fair Value Measurements:    Accounting guidance for our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities requires that we disclose the type of inputs we use to value our assets and liabilities, based on three categories of inputs as defined in such. Level 1 inputs are quoted, unadjusted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. These requirements apply to our long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets. We use Level 3 inputs to value all of such assets and the methodology we use to value such assets has not changed since December 31, 2009. The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements.

        Warranty Costs:    We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

        Income Taxes:    As part of the process of preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net



deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

        We record valuation allowances in order to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under SFAS No. 109,the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

        At December 31, 2008, we had a valuation allowance of approximately $82.9 million against substantially all of our domestic net deferred tax assets, which consist of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, as well as temporary deductible differences. If we are able to realize part or all of the domestic deferred tax assets in future periods, we will reduce our provision for income taxes with a release of the valuation allowance in an amount that corresponds with the income tax liability generated.

        Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement 109("FIN 48")Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48,such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. We had approximately $1.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008, which predominantly relate to positions taken on our foreign tax returns and all of which represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate in future periods. At December 31, 2007, the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits was $1.9 million relating to foreign unrecognized tax benefits.

        Share-BasedEquity-based Compensation:    Share-basedEquity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period.



In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and option life.

        The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company's historical and future expectation of dividend payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.

        We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical volatility, calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and implied volatility, utilizing market data of actively traded options on our common stock, which are obtained from public data sources. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

        The expected term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

        We estimate forfeitures using itsour historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

        With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        Recent Accounting Pronouncements:Business Combinations:    In September 2006,December 2010, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157" ("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for itemsamended guidance related to Business Combinations. The amendments affect any public entity that enters into business combinations that are recognizedmaterial on an individual or disclosed at fair value in theaggregate basis. The amendments specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, on a recurring basis (at least annually), untilthe entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the first quartercomparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of fiscal 2009. The measurementthe nature and disclosure requirements relatedamount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to financial assets and financial liabilities were effective for us beginningthe business combination included in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The adoption of SFAS No. 157amendments are effective prospectively for financial assets and financial liabilities did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements when it is applied to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities beginning in the first quarter of 2009, including periodic fair value measurements for goodwill, long-lived assets and restructuring liabilities. The resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157 after adoption may be different from the fair values that would have been calculated under previous guidance.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations("SFAS 141(R)") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an Amendment of ARB No. 51("SFAS 160"). Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date at fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) also changes the accounting treatment for certain other items that relate to



business combinations. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will assess the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements if and when an acquisition occurs.

        Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:    In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. The amendments modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        Subsequent Events:    The FASB has issued amended guidance for subsequent events. The amendment removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC's literature. All of the amendments were effective upon issuance (February 24, 2010). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        Fair Value Measurements:    In January 1, 2009.2010, the FASB issued amended guidance for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This update requires some new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. The purpose of SFAS 160FASB's objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the relevance, comparability, and transparency of thein financial informationreporting. Specifically, this update requires that a reporting entity providesdisclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in itsand out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, this update clarifies the requirements of existing disclosures. For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the



valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update was adopted on January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The most significant provisions of this statement result in changes to the presentation of noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 isThose disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement will impact the manner in which we present noncontrolling interests, but will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments2010, and Hedging Activities("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and requires comparative disclosures only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS 161 will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1,Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)("FSP APB 14-1"). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. FSP APB 14-1Early application is permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will require issuershave a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        Revenue Recognition:    In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to multiple-element arrangements which requires an entity to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of convertible debt that can be settled in cashan arrangement to separately account for (i.e., bifurcate) a portionall of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This update eliminates the use of the debt associated withresidual method of allocation and requires the conversion feature and reclassify this portionrelative-selling-price method in all circumstances. All entities must adopt the guidance no later than the beginning of their first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Entities may elect to stockholders' equity. The liability portion, which representsadopt the fair value of the debt without the conversion feature, is accreted to its face value over the life of the debt usingguidance through either prospective application for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified, after the effective interest method, with the accretion recordeddate or through retrospective application to interest expense. FSP APB 14-1 will be applied retrospectively toall revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The cumulative effect ofCompany does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In October 2009, the change in accounting principleFASB issued amended guidance that is expected to significantly affect how entities account for revenue arrangements that contain both hardware and software elements. As a result, many tangible products that rely on periods prior to those presentedsoftware will be recognized as ofaccounted for under the revised multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance, rather than the software revenue recognition guidance. The revised guidance must be adopted by all entities no later than fiscal years beginning ofon or after June 15, 2010. An entity must select the firstsame transition method and same period presented. We expectfor the adoption of FSP APB 14-1both this guidance and the revisions to the multiple-element arrangements guidance noted above. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material effectimpact on ourits consolidated financial position, results of operations, and earnings per share. During the second quarter of 2007, we issued New Notes that may be settled in cash upon conversion and are subject to the requirements of FSB APB 14-1. As of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 in the beginning of 2009, effective as of date of issuance of the New Notes, we will reclassify approximately $16.3 million from long-term debt to additional paid-in capital, and our accumulated deficit will reflect approximately $4.8 million of debt accretion that occurred between the issuance date of the New Notes and the adoption date. Approximately $2.8 to $3.3 million of additional interest expense will be recorded annually from the adoption date through the maturity date of the New Notes. This additional interest expense will not require the use of cash.statements.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Risk

        The principal market risks (such as the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices) to which we are exposed are:


Interest Rates

        We centrally manage our debt and investment portfolios considering investment opportunities and risks,risk, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. Our investment portfoliosportfolio includes fixed-income securities with a fair value of approximately $394.2 million at December 31, 20082010. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. Based on our investment portfolio at December 31, 2007, respectively, consist of cash equivalents. Assuming year-end 2008 variable debt and investment levels, a2010, an immediate 100 basis points changepoint increase in interest rates wouldmay result in a significant decrease in the fair value of the portfolio. While an increase in interest rates may reduce the fair value of the investment portfolio, we will not realize the losses in the consolidated statement of operations unless the individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or the loss is determined to be other-than-temporary. Our debt portfolio consists of fixed rate and fixed maturity instruments therefore any changes in interest rates will not have a materialan impact on net interest expense. In December 2001 and January 2002, we issued an aggregate of $220.0 million of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes ("Old Notes"). During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of our Old Notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of our Old Notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the original convertible subordinated notes ("New Notes") to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregate principal amount of new notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of the Old Notes remained outstanding. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we paid off the remaining $25.2 million of Old Notes outstanding. In addition, we repurchased $12.2 million aggregate principal amount of our New Notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $117.8 million to $105.6 million. The New Notes bear interest at 4.125% per annum and mature on April 15, 2012. These notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including our common stock trading at prices 130% over the conversion price for a specified period. Such notes are convertible at a price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007. We pay interest on these notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year.


Foreign Operations

        Operating in international markets involves exposure to movements in currency exchange rates, which are volatile at times. The economic impact of currency exchange rate movements on Veeco is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. These changes, if material, could cause us to adjust our financing and operating strategies. Consequently, isolating the effect of changes in currency does not incorporate these other important economic factors.

        Our net sales to foreign customers represented approximately 63%90%, 68%,79% and 67%59% of our total net sales in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. We expect that net sales to foreign customers will continue to represent a large percentage of our total net sales. Our net sales denominated in foreign currencies represented approximately 15%2%, 20%,6% and 16%5% of total net sales in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. The aggregate foreign currency exchange gain (loss) included in determining consolidated results of operations was approximately $0.1$1.3 million, ($0.5)$(0.7) million and ($0.3)$(0.1) million in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. Included in the aggregate foreign currency exchange gain (loss) were lossesgains (losses) relating to forward contracts of $1.0 million, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million and ($0.4) million in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. These amounts were recognized and included in other income,expense (income), net. As of December 31, 2008,2010, approximately $0.9 million of losses related to forward contracts were included in accrued expenses and subsequently paid in January 2009. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $0.1$0.3 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and cash in an amount equivalent to such gains wasthese amounts were subsequently received in January 2008. On2011. As of December 27, 2007, we entered into31, 2009, approximately $0.2 million of gains related to forward contracts for the month ofwere included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and these amounts were subsequently received in January 2008 for the notional amount of approximately $7.0 million. The fair values of these2010. Monthly forward contracts at inception were zero, which did not significantly change at December 31, 2007. A monthly forward contract for a notional amount of $0.5$18.5 million for the month of January 2009 was not2011 were entered into until January 2009.in December 2010. We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we use derivative financial



instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We enter into monthly forward contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known currency exposures. The average notional amount of such contracts outstanding was approximately $2.1$6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.2010. The changes in currency exchange rates that have the largest impact on translating our international operating profit (loss) are the Japanese Yen, the British Pound and the Euro. We believe that based upon our hedging program, a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would have an immaterial impact on the consolidated results of operations. We believe that this quantitative measure has inherent limitations because, as discussed in the first paragraph of this section, it does not take into account any governmental actions or changes in either customer purchasing patterns or our financing and operating strategies.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        Our Consolidated Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule filed as part of this Form 10-K.

Quarterly Results of Operations

        The following table presents selected unaudited financial data for each quarter of fiscal 20082010 and 2007.2009. Consistent with prior years, we report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 20082010 interim quarter ends were March 30,28, June 29,27 and September 28.26. The 20072009 interim quarter ends were April 1, July 1,March 29, June 28 and September 30.27. For ease of reference, we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30 and September 30 in our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.


        Although unaudited, this information has been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and, in the opinion of our management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of this information in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations and should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

 
 Fiscal 2008 Fiscal 2007 
 
 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 
 
 (in thousands, except per share data)
 (in thousands, except per share data)
 

Net sales

 $102,307 $114,449 $115,709 $110,344 $442,809 $99,166 $98,769 $97,718 $106,822 $402,475 

Gross profit

  42,626  47,730  46,083  40,155  176,594  43,695  42,245  35,894  35,677  157,511 

Net (loss) income

  (1,583) 4,202  (1,673) (72,009) (71,063) 293  (2,595) (5,683) (9,374) (17,359)

Net (loss) income per common share

 $(0.05)$0.13 $(0.05)$(2.29)$(2.27)$0.01 $(0.08)$(0.18)$(0.30)$(0.56)

Diluted net (loss) income per common share

 $(0.05)$0.13 $(0.05)$(2.29)$(2.27)$0.01 $(0.08)$(0.18)$(0.30)$(0.56)

Weighted average shares outstanding

  31,161  31,255  31,458  31,500  31,347  30,899  30,926  31,100  31,128  31,020 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  31,161  31,590  31,458  31,500  31,347  31,281  30,926  31,100  31,128  31,020 

 
 Fiscal 2010 Fiscal 2009 
 
 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 
 
 (in thousands, except per share data)
 

Net sales

 $134,750 $221,389 $277,094 $299,998 $933,231 $39,107 $49,475 $74,688 $119,142 $282,412 

Gross profit

  56,740  98,801  135,482  152,802  443,825  10,909  16,248  30,547  53,531  111,235 

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes

  22,824  49,931  91,104  96,672  260,531  (17,661) (12,577) 31  15,978  (14,229)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

  3,220  2,462  (4,941) 100,488  101,229  (3,283) (2,126) 1,239  2,767  (1,403)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

            (42) (23)     (65)
                      

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $26,044 $52,393 $86,163 $197,160 $361,760 $(20,902)$(14,680)$1,270 $18,745 $(15,567)
                      

Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

                               

Basic:

                               
 

Continuing operations

 $0.59 $1.26 $2.28 $2.45 $6.60 $(0.56)$(0.40)$ $0.45 $(0.44)
 

Discontinued operations

  0.08  0.06  (0.12) 2.55  2.56  (0.10) (0.07) 0.04  0.08  (0.04)
                      
 

Income (loss)

 $0.67 $1.32 $2.16 $5.00 $9.16 $(0.66)$(0.47)$0.04 $0.53 $(0.48)
                      

Diluted :

                               
 

Continuing operations

 $0.54 $1.15 $2.16 $2.30 $6.13 $(0.56)$(0.40)$ $0.42 $(0.44)
 

Discontinued operations

  0.08  0.05  (0.12) 2.40  2.38  (0.10) (0.07) 0.04  0.08  (0.04)
                      
 

Income (loss)

 $0.62 $1.20 $2.04 $4.70 $8.51 $(0.66)$(0.47)$0.04 $0.50 $(0.48)
                      

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                               
 

Basic

  38,784  39,761  39,946  39,453  39,499  31,515  31,497  31,608  35,623  32,628 
 

Diluted

  42,269  43,506  42,258  41,972  42,514  31,515  31,497  32,375  37,742  32,628 

        On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology's operating results are accounted for as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated results of operations. The sales transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. As part of our agreement with Bruker, $22.9 million of proceeds is held in escrow and is restricted from use for one year from the closing date of the transaction to secure certain specified losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we made in the stock purchase agreement and related documents. As part of the sale we incurred transaction costs, which consisted of investment bank fees and legal fees, totaling $5.2 million. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $156.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain of $5.4 million related to the assets in China.

        During the first quarter of 2008,2010, we recognized a restructuring credit of $0.2 million associated with a change in estimate.


        During the first quarter of 2009, we recognized a restructuring charge of $2.9$2.3 million, primarily for personnel severance. During the second quarter of 2009, we recognized an additional restructuring charge of approximately $1.7 million primarily for lease-related costs associated with the consolidation of our Corporate headquarters into our Plainview, New York facility and personnel severance costs and an asset impairment charge of $0.3 million.million for property and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage segment. During the third quarter of 2008,2009, we recognized an additional restructuring charge of $4.1$0.8 million, consisting of $3.7 million associated with the acceleration of equity awards and otherprimarily for personnel severance costs resulting from the mutually agreed termination of the employment agreement of the Company's former CEO, as well as $0.4 million for severance and lease-related charges in Metrology.costs. During the fourth quarter of 2008,



2009, we recognized an additional restructuring charge of $3.6$0.1 million related to personnel severance costs and lease-related commitments, as well as an asset impairment charge of $73.0 million, consisting of $52.3 related to goodwill and $20.7 million related to long-lived assets, and a $2.9 million inventory write-off associated with legacy products in Metrology. These charges were partially offset by a $5.0 million net gain on the early extinguishment of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes.

        During the first quarter of 2007, we recorded a net gain on the extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million, resulting from the repurchase of $56.0 million of our of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes.

        During the second quarter of 2007, in conjunction with a cost reduction plan, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $1.5 million. During the third quarter of 2007, we recognized an additional charge of $0.5 million related to this plan. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recognized additional restructuring expense of $4.7 million, as well as an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million and an inventory write-off of $4.8 million.costs.

        A variety of factors influence the level of our net sales in a particular quarter including economic conditions in the HB-LED,HB LED, solar, data storage and semiconductor industries, the timing of significant orders, shipment delays, specific feature requests by customers, the introduction of new products by us and our competitors, production and quality problems, changes in material costs, disruption in sources of supply, seasonal patterns of capital spending by customers, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the sale of products which have an average selling price in excess of $750,000.$2,000,000. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue from a single transaction could have a significant impact on our net sales and operating results in any given quarter.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls, and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

        We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


        Subsequent to that evaluation there have been no significant changes in our disclosure controls or procedures or other factors that could significantly affect these controls or procedures after such evaluation.


Design and Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have included a report of management's assessment of the design and effectiveness of its internal controls as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.2010. Our independent registered public accounting firm also attested to, and reported on, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management's report and the independent registered public accounting firm's attestation report are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 20082010 under the caption entitled "Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" and "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting."

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        We have implemented company-wide integrated applications software. We completed the conversion to this platform in all of our business locations by April 2008 other than at Veeco Solar, which was acquired from Mill Lane during the second quarter of 2008. The implementation of applications software was completed at Veeco Solar during the first quarter of 2009. As a result of this company-wide integrated software, certain changes have been made to our internal controls, which management believes will strengthen our internal control structure. There have been no other significant changes in our internal controls or other factors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information

        None.



PART III

        Portions of the information required by Part III of Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from Veeco's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with Veeco's 20092011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement").

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

        The information required by Item 10 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Corporate Governance," "Executive Officers" and "Section 16(a) Reporting Compliance."

        We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers (the "Code") which applies to our chief executive officer, president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code can be found on our website (www.veeco.com). We intend to disclose on our website the nature of any future amendments to and waivers of the Code that apply to the chief executive officer, president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct which applies to all of our employees, including those listed above, as well as to our directors. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct can be found on our website (www.veeco.com). The website address above is intended to be an inactive, textual reference only. None of the material on this website is part of this report.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

        The information required by Item 11 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Executive Compensation."

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

        The information required by Item 12 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information."

        The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2008.2010. See Note 58 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for information regarding the material features of these plans.

 
 Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(a)
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  5,394,052(1)$20.25  1,037,341 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  178,042(2)$21.57   
         

Total

  5,572,094     1,037,341 
         

 
 Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(a)
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  2,560,354 $19.62  2,623,776 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  9,272(1)$43.19   
         

Total

  2,569,626     2,623,776 
         

(1)
Includes 3,726 stock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of CVC, Inc. on May 10, 2000, which merger was approved by stockholders.

(2)
Includes 145,342 stockStock options assumed in connection with the acquisition of Applied Epi, Inc. on September 17, 2001.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence

        The information required by Item 13 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Independence of the Board of Directors" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

        The information required by Item 14 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Proposal 2—Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP."



PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)
The Registrant's financial statements together with a separate table of contents are annexed hereto. The financial statement schedule is listed in the separate table of contents annexed hereto.

(b)
Exhibits

        Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number
 Exhibit Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
3.12.1 Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 15, 2010 among Veeco Instruments Inc. (Veeco), Veeco Metrology Inc. and Bruker CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Exhibit 2.1

3.1


Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the CompanyVeeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997.

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 3.1

3.2

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998.

 

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 3.2

3.3

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000.

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.1

3.4

 

Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco.

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, Exhibit 3.1

3.5

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Exhibit 3.1

3.6


Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010


Filed herewith

3.7


Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company,Veeco, effective October 23, 2008

 

Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1

3.8


Amendment No. 1 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective May 20, 2010


Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2010, Exhibit 3.1

NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Rights Agent, including the form of the Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights setting forth the terms of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Exhibit A, the form of Rights Certificates as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C. Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated March 15, 2001, Exhibit 1

4.2

 

Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent.

 

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 21, 2001, Exhibit 4.1

4.3

 

Amendment No 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2002, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent.

 

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002, Exhibit 4.1

4.4

 

Indenture, dated April 16, 2007, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank National Trust

 

Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 To Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128004) filed April 16, 2007, Exhibit 4.1


Number4.5
ExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
4.5
 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 20, 2007, by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee

 

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 20, 2007, Exhibit 4.1

10.1

 
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2007, by and among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
10.2First Amendment dated as of February 25, 2008 to the Credit Agreement dated August 20, 2007 among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.2
10.3Amendment and Reaffirmation dated August 20, 2007 of Security Agreement dated as of March 15, 2005 among Veeco Instruments Inc., the subsidiaries of Veeco named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.2
10.4
Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.2
10.5
10.2

 

Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002).

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.2
10.6
10.3

 

Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.3
10.7
10.4

*

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco Instruments Inc.and each of its directors and executive officers.


Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1

10.5

*

Veeco Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

 

Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-93958), Exhibit 10.20
10.8
10.6

*

Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

 

Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.1

NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.910.7*Amendment dated July 25, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.2
10.10
10.8

*

Amendment dated May 29, 1998 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

 

Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.1
10.11
10.9

*

Amendment dated May 14, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan.

 

Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.2

10.10

*

Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006.


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.4

10.11

*

Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1

10.12

*

Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.


Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.41

10.13

*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3

10.14

*

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

10.15

*

Veeco 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 14, 2010


Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-166852) filed May 14, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

10.16

*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement


Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-166852) filed May 14, 2010, Exhibit 10.2

10.17

*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement


Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-166852) filed May 14, 2010, Exhibit 10.3

10.18

*

Veeco Performance-Based Restricted Stock 2010


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.2

10.19

*

Veeco 2010 Management Bonus Plan dated January 22, 2010


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.2

10.20

*

Veeco 2010 Special Profit Sharing Plan dated February 15, 2010


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.3

10.21

*

Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3

Number
 Exhibit Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.12*Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-85184), Exhibit 10.17
10.1310.22*Amendment No. 1 dated May 15, 1996December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Senior Executive Change in Control Policy Registration StatementAnnual Report on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08981) filed July 26, 1996,10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.210.37
10.14
10.23

*
Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.3
10.15*Amendment dated May 21, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.3
10.16*Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan,
Service Agreement effective July 20, 2006.24, 2008 between Veeco and Edward H. Braun

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,2008, Exhibit 10.410.1
10.17
10.24

*
Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
10.18*Form of Restricted Stock
Employment Agreement pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3
10.19*Form of Directors Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
10.20*Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3
10.21*Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-49476) filed November 7, 2000, Exhibit 4.4
10.22*Amendment No. 1 to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees, effective dated July 26, 2001.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-66574) filed August 2, 2001, Exhibit 4.2
10.23*Veeco Instruments Inc. 2006 Long-Term Cash Incentive PlanQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
10.24*Employment agreement effective as of July 1, 2007 between Veeco and John R. Peeler and Veeco Instruments Inc.
 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.3

10.25

*

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler


Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.38

10.26

*

Second Amendment effective June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

10.27

*

Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2009 (effective January 18, 2010) between Veeco and David D. Glass


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

10.28

*

Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.


Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38

10.29

*

Form of Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan and Robert P. Oates


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

10.30

*

Form of Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan, Mark R. Munch and Robert P. Oates


Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.40

10.31

*

Letter agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Exhibit 10.2

10.32

*

Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco and Robert P. Oates


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.1

10.33

*

Amendment dated September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and Robert P. Oates


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.2

10.34

*

Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2003 between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr. and Veeco Instruments Inc.

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, Exhibit 10.5

10.35

*

Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2

10.36

*

Amendment dated as of September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.


Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1

Number
 Exhibit Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.2610.37*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement ofbetween Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr., effective June 9, 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
10.27*Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between the Company and John P. Kiernan. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,2008, Exhibit 10.3810.39
10.28
10.38

*
Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Robert P. OatesQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.1
10.29*Form of Amendment to Letter Agreements of John P. Kiernan and Robert P. Oates effective June 9, 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3
10.30*Letter Agreement dated October 15, 2007 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and William A. TomeoAnnual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.32
10.31*
Letter Agreement dated January 11, 2008 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Mark R. Munch

 

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.33
10.32
10.39

*
Form of Indemnification
Letter Agreement entered intodated September 23, 2010 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.Mark R. Munch

 
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
10.33*Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of September 12, 2008 between John F. Rein, Jr. and Veeco Instruments Inc.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008,2010, Exhibit 10.1
10.34
21.1
*
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of September 12, 2008 between Robert P. Oates and Veeco Instruments Inc.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.2
10.35*Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3
10.36*Service Agreement effective July 24, 2008 between Edward H. Braun and Veeco Instruments Inc.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1
10.37*Amendment No. 1 dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Instruments Inc. Senior Executive Change in Control PolicyFiled herewith
10.38*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco Instruments Inc. and John R. PeelerFiled herewith
10.39*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco Instruments Inc. and John F. Rein, Jr.Filed herewith
10.40*Form of Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreements between Veeco Instruments Inc. and each of John P. Kiernan, Mark R. Munch and Robert P. OatesFiled herewith

Number
ExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.41*Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.Filed herewith
10.42Second Amendment dated as of February 27, 2009 (effective December 31, 2008) to the Credit Agreement dated August 20, 2007 among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Filed herewith
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
 

Filed herewith

23.1

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Filed herewith

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Filed herewith

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Filed herewith

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Filed herewith

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Filed herewith

*
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a) (3) of Form 10-K.


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 2, 2009.February 23, 2011.

  VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ JOHN R. PEELER

John R. Peeler
Chief Executive Officer

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, on March 2, 2009.February 23, 2011.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 
/s/ EDWARD H. BRAUN

Edward H. Braun
 Director and Chairman

/s/ RICHARD A. D'AMORE

Richard A. D'Amore

 

Director

/s/ JOEL A. ELFTMANN

Joel A. Elftmann

 

Director

/s/ HEINZ K. FRIDRICHTHOMAS GUTIERREZ

Heinz K. FridrichThomas Gutierrez

 

Director

/s/ DOUGLAS A. KINGSLEYGORDON HUNTER

Douglas A. KingsleyGordon Hunter

 

Director

/s/ ROGER D. MCDANIEL

Roger D. McDaniel

 

Director

/s/ JOHN R. PEELER

John R. Peeler

 

Director and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

/s/ IRWIN H. PFISTER

Irwin H. Pfister


Director

/s/ PETER J. SIMONE

Peter J. Simone

 

Director

/s/ JOHN F. REIN, JR.DAVID D. GLASS

John F. Rein, Jr.David D. Glass

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal
(principal financial officer)

/s/ JOHN P. KIERNAN

John P. Kiernan

 

Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller (principal
(principal accounting officer)

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

and Financial Statement Schedule

 
 Page

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 F-3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements

 F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20082010 and 20072009

 F-5

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 20062008

 F-6

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

F-7

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 20062008

 F-7F-8

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 20062008

 F-8F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 F-9F-10

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 S-1

Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLManagement's Report on Internal Control
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTINGOver Financial Reporting

        Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") inInternal Control-Integrated Framework.

        Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.2010.

        The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20082010 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears under the heading "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting."

Veeco Instruments Inc.
Plainview, NY
March 2, 2009February 23, 2011

/s/ JOHN R. PEELER

John R. Peeler
Chief Executive Officer
Veeco Instruments Inc.
March 2, 2009February 23, 2011
  

/s/ JOHN F. REIN, JR.DAVID D. GLASS

John F. Rein, Jr.David D. Glass
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Veeco Instruments Inc.
March 2, 2009February 23, 2011

 

 

Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Veeco Instruments Inc.

        We have audited Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries'Subsidiaries (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2010, based on the COSO criteria.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 20082010 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 2, 2009February 23, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  

New York, New York
March 2, 2009February 23, 2011


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
on Financial Statements

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Veeco Instruments Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008.2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule in the accompanying Index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008,2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 2, 2009,February 23, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  

New York, New York
March 2, 2009February 23, 2011


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands)

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Assets

       

Current assets:

       
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $103,799 $117,083 
 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $937 in 2008 and $984 in 2007

  59,659  75,207 
 

Inventories

  94,930  98,594 
 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  6,425  8,901 
 

Deferred income taxes

  2,185  2,649 
      

Total current assets

  266,998  302,434 

Property, plant, and equipment at cost, net

  64,372  66,142 

Goodwill

  59,160  100,898 

Intangible assets, net

  38,818  59,647 

Other assets

  193  213 
      

Total assets

 $429,541 $529,334 
      

Liabilities and shareholders' equity

       

Current liabilities:

       
 

Accounts payable

 $29,610 $36,639 
 

Accrued expenses

  66,964  60,201 
 

Deferred profit

  1,346  3,250 
 

Income taxes payable

  354  2,278 
 

Current portion of long-term debt

  196  25,550 
      

Total current liabilities

  98,470  127,918 

Deferred income taxes

  4,540  3,712 

Long-term debt

  108,669  121,035 

Other non-current liabilities

  2,391  1,978 

Noncontrolling interest

  784  1,014 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

       

Shareholders' equity:

       

Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

     

Common stock, 60,000,000 shares authorized; 32,187,599 and 31,823,890 shares issued and outstanding in 2008 and 2007, respectively

  316  312 

Additional paid-in-capital

  409,982  399,795 

Accumulated deficit

  (202,778) (131,715)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  7,167  5,285 
      

Total shareholders' equity

  214,687  273,677 
      

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $429,541 $529,334 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Assets

       

Current assets:

       
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $245,132 $148,500 
 

Short-term investments

  394,180  135,000 
 

Restricted cash

  76,115   
 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $512 in 2010 and $438 in 2009

  150,528  67,546 
 

Inventories

  108,487  55,807 
 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  34,328  6,419 
 

Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

    40,058 
 

Deferred income taxes

  13,803  3,105 
      

Total current assets

  1,022,573  456,435 

Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

  42,320  44,707 

Goodwill

  52,003  52,003 

Deferred income taxes

  9,403   

Intangible assets, net

  16,893  21,770 

Other assets

  4,842  429 

Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

    30,028 
      

Total assets

 $1,148,034 $605,372 
      

Liabilities and equity

       

Current liabilities:

       
 

Accounts payable

 $32,220 $24,910 
 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  183,010  99,823 
 

Deferred profit

  4,109  2,520 
 

Income taxes payable

  56,369  829 
 

Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

  5,359  10,824 
 

Current portion of long-term debt

  101,367  212 
      

Total current liabilities

  382,434  139,118 

Deferred income taxes

    5,039 

Long-term debt

  2,654  100,964 

Other liabilities

  434  1,192 

Equity:

       
 

Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

     
 

Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized 120,000,000 shares; 40,337,950 and 39,003,114 shares issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively

  409  382 
 

Additional paid-in-capital

  656,969  575,860 
 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

  137,436  (224,324)
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  5,796  7,141 
 

Less: treasury stock, at cost; 1,118,600 shares in 2010

  (38,098)  
      

Total equity

  762,512  359,059 
      

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,148,034 $605,372 
      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Net sales

 $442,809 $402,475 $441,034 

Cost of sales

  266,215  244,964  246,910 
        

Gross profit

  176,594  157,511  194,124 

Operating expenses:

          
 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

  92,838  90,972  93,110 
 

Research and development expense

  60,353  61,174  61,925 
 

Amortization expense

  10,745  10,250  16,045 
 

Restructuring expense

  10,562  6,726   
 

Asset impairment charge

  73,322  1,068   
 

Write-off of purchased in-process technology

      1,160 
 

Other income, net

  (668) (618) (572)
        

Total operating expenses

  247,152  169,572  171,668 
        

Operating (loss) income

  (70,558) (12,061) 22,456 

Interest expense

  6,400  6,976  9,194 

Interest income

  (2,588) (3,963) (4,926)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

  (4,969) (738) (330)
        

(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  (69,401) (14,336) 18,518 

Income tax provision

  1,892  3,651  4,959 

Noncontrolling interest

  (230) (628) (1,358)
        

Net (loss) income

 $(71,063)$(17,359)$14,917 
        

(Loss) income per common share:

          

Net (loss) income per common share

 $(2.27)$(0.56)$0.49 
        

Diluted net (loss) income per common share

 $(2.27)$(0.56)$0.48 
        

Weighted average shares outstanding

  31,347  31,020  30,492 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  31,347  31,020  31,059 

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Net sales

 $933,231 $282,412 $314,935 

Cost of sales

  489,406  171,177  191,664 
        

Gross profit

  443,825  111,235  123,271 

Operating expenses (income):

          
 

Selling, general and administrative

  91,777  62,151  60,542 
 

Research and development

  71,390  43,483  39,608 
 

Amortization

  4,876  5,168  8,864 
 

Restructuring

  (179) 4,837  9,424 
 

Asset impairment

    304  51,387 
 

Other, net

  (1,614) 24  (414)
        

Total operating expenses

  166,250  115,967  169,411 
        

Operating income (loss)

  277,575  (4,732) (46,140)

Interest expense

  8,201  7,732  9,317 

Interest income

  (1,629) (882) (2,588)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

      (3,758)
        

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

  271,003  (11,582) (49,111)

Income tax provision

  10,472  2,647  1,722 
        

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  260,531  (14,229) (50,833)

Discontinued operations:

          
 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes (includes gain on disposal of $156,290 in 2010)

  155,455  (2,703) (24,418)
 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  54,226  (1,300) 170 
        

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  101,229  (1,403) (24,588)
        

Net income (loss)

  361,760  (15,632) (75,421)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

    (65) (230)
        

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $361,760 $(15,567)$(75,191)
        

Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

          

Basic:

          
  

Continuing operations

 $6.60 $(0.44)$(1.62)
  

Discontinued operations

  2.56  (0.04) (0.78)
        
 

Income (loss)

 $9.16 $(0.48)$(2.40)
        

Diluted:

          
  

Continuing operations

 $6.13 $(0.44)$(1.62)
  

Discontinued operations

  2.38  (0.04) (0.78)
        
 

Income (loss)

 $8.51 $(0.48)$(2.40)
        

Weighted average shares outstanding:

          

Basic

  39,499  32,628  31,347 

Diluted

  42,514  32,628  31,347 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(In thousands)

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Net income (loss)

 $361,760 $(15,632)$(75,421)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

          
 

Foreign currency translation

  (1,322) (58) 1,845 
 

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

  97     
 

Minimum pension liability

  (120) 32  37 
        

Comprehensive income (loss)

  360,415  (15,658) (73,539)

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

    (65) (230)
        

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $360,415 $(15,593)$(73,309)
        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Equity

(Dollars in thousands)

 
 Common Stock  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 Accumulated
Deficit
 Accumulated
Comprehensive
Income
  
 Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
 
 Shares Amount Total 

Balance at December 31, 2005

  30,060,182 $300 $373,741 $(128,445)$2,991 $248,587    

Exercise of stock options and stock issuances under stock purchase plan

  853,224  9  15,515      15,524 $ 

Share-based compensation expense

      2,219      2,219   

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

  205,216    (99)     (99)  

Translation adjustments

          644  644  644 

Defined benefit pension plan

          (41) (41) (41)

Net income

        14,917    14,917  14,917 
                

Balance at December 31, 2006

  31,118,622  309  391,376  (113,528) 3,594  281,751 $15,520 
                      

Cumulative effect of accounting change due to adoption of FIN 48

        (828)   (828)$ 

Exercise of stock options and stock issuances under stock purchase plan

  205,995  2  3,170      3,172   

Share-based compensation expense

      5,620      5,620   

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

  499,273  1  (371)     (370)  

Translation adjustments

          1,698  1,698  1,698 

Defined benefit pension plan

          (7) (7) (7)

Net loss

        (17,359)   (17,359) (17,359)
                

Balance at December 31, 2007

  31,823,890  312  399,795  (131,715) 5,285  273,677 $(15,668)
                      

Exercise of stock options

  67,080  1  680      681 $ 

Share-based compensation expense

      10,526      10,526   

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

  296,629  3  (1,019)     (1,016)  

Translation adjustments

          1,845  1,845  1,845 

Defined benefit pension plan

          37  37  37 

Net loss

        (71,063)   (71,063) (71,063)
                

Balance at December 31, 2008

  32,187,599 $316 $409,982 $(202,778)$7,167 $214,687 $(69,181)
                

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Equity Attributable to 
 
 Common Stock  
  
 Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
  
 
 
 Treasury
Stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
  
 Noncontrolling
Interest
  
 
 
 Shares Amount Veeco Total 

Balance at January 1, 2008

  31,823,890 $312 $ $416,113 $(133,566)$5,285 $288,144 $1,014 $289,158 

Exercise of stock options

  67,080  1    680      681    681 

Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

        9,668      9,668    9,668 

Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

        858      858    858 

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

  296,629  3    (1,019)     (1,016)   (1,016)

Translation adjustments

            1,845  1,845    1,845 

Defined benefit pension plan

            37  37    37 

Net loss

          (75,191)   (75,191) (230) (75,421)
                    

Balance at December 31, 2008

  32,187,599  316    426,300  (208,757) 7,167  225,026  784  225,810 

Exercise of stock options

  755,229  8    12,578      12,586    12,586 

Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

        7,547      7,547    7,547 

Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

        990      990    990 

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

  310,286      (607)     (607)   (607)

Issuance of common stock

  5,750,000  58    130,028      130,086    130,086 

Translation adjustments

            (58) (58)   (58)

Defined benefit pension plan

            32  32    32 

Purchase of remaining 80.1% of noncontrolling interest

        (976)     (976) (719) (1,695)

Net loss

          (15,567)   (15,567) (65) (15,632)
                    

Balance at December 31, 2009

  39,003,114  382    575,860  (224,324) 7,141  359,059    359,059 

Exercise of stock options

  2,499,591  25    45,139      45,164    45,164 

Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

        9,648      9,648    9,648 

Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

        7,672      7,672    7,672 

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

  (46,155) 2    (4,621)     (4,619)   (4,619)

Treasury stock

  (1,118,600)   (38,098)       (38,098)   (38,098)

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

        23,271      23,271    23,271 

Translation adjustments

            (1,322) (1,322)   (1,322)

Defined benefit pension plan

            (120) (120)   (120)

Unrealized gain on short-term investments

            97  97    97 

Net income

          361,760    361,760    361,760 
                    

Balance at December 31, 2010

  40,337,950 $409 $(38,098)$656,969 $137,436 $5,796 $762,512 $ $762,512 
                    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Operating activities

          

Net (loss) income

 $(71,063)$(17,359)$14,917 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

          
 

Depreciation and amortization

  25,089  24,991  30,080 
 

Non-cash asset impairment charge

  73,322  1,068   
 

Non-cash inventory write-off

  2,900  4,821   
 

Non-cash restructuring credit

  (105)    
 

Net gain on early extinguishment of long-term debt

  (4,969) (738) (330)
 

Non-cash share-based compensation

  10,526  5,620  2,219 
 

Deferred income taxes

  1,569  1,332  1,370 
 

Noncontrolling interest

  (230) (628) (1,358)
 

Provision for bad debts

  (49) (1,070) 322 
 

Net gain on sale of fixed assets

  (53) (77) (18)
 

Write-off of purchased in-process technology

      1,160 
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

          
  

Accounts receivable

  20,062  15,114  3,439 
  

Inventories

  6,202  (1,331) (10,518)
  

Accounts payable

  (7,921) (4,049) 9,155 
  

Accrued expenses, deferred profit, and other current liabilities

  (10,211) 13,129  228 
  

Other, net

  (805) (1,638) (4,651)
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  44,264  39,185  46,015 

Investing activities

          

Capital expenditures

  (12,806) (9,092) (17,401)

Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

  (10,981)   (3,068)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment and assets held for sale

  103  312  47 

Other

      1,686 
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (23,684) (8,780) (18,736)

Financing activities

          

Proceeds from stock issuances

  681  3,172  15,524 

Payments of debt issuance costs

    (1,579)  

Restricted stock tax withholdings

  (1,019) (371) (99)

Repayments of long-term debt

  (32,659) (60,706) (19,776)
        

Net cash used in financing activities

  (32,997) (59,484) (4,351)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (867) (884) (381)
        

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (13,284) (29,963) 22,547 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  117,083  147,046  124,499 
        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $103,799 $117,083 $147,046 
        

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

          

Interest paid

 $6,530 $6,108 $9,202 

Income taxes paid

  3,215  1,618  2,915 

Non-cash investing and financing activities

          

Accrual of contingent earn-out payment to former shareholders of acquired company

  9,644     

Transfers from property, plant, and equipment to inventory

  404  1,758  1,486 

Transfers from inventory to property, plant, and equipment

  385  181  955 

Exchange of convertible subordinated notes

    118,766   

Acquisition of assets in connection with the consolidation of a variable interest entity

      3,550 

Assumption of liabilities in connection with the consolidation of a variable interest entity

      643 

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Operating activities

          

Net income (loss)

 $361,760 $(15,632)$(75,421)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

          
 

Depreciation and amortization

  12,854  13,865  17,685 
 

Amortization of debt discount

  3,058  2,846  2,917 
 

Non-cash equity-based compensation

  9,648  7,547  9,668 
 

Non-cash asset impairment

    304  51,387 
 

Non-cash inventory write-off

    1,526   
 

Non-cash restructuring

  (179)   (105)
 

Net gain on early extinguishment of debt

      (3,758)
 

Deferred income taxes

  (25,141) (414) 1,569 
 

Gain on disposal of segment (see Note 3)

  (156,290)    
 

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

  (23,271)    
 

Other, net

  1,034  44  (87)
 

Non-cash items from discontinued operations

  10,025  8,805  33,070 
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

          
  

Accounts receivable

  (83,160) (28,379) 12,727 
  

Inventories

  (49,535) 10,322  3,683 
  

Supplier deposits

  (23,296) 117  (122)
  

Accounts payable

  7,299  3,067  (6,110)
  

Accrued expenses, deferred profit and other current liabilities

  85,500  51,582  (4,453)
  

Income taxes payable

  78,894  1,482  (2,931)
  

Other, net

  (9,491) (2,904) 2,287 
  

Discontinued operations

  (5,495) 4,860  1,188 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  194,214  59,038  43,194 

Investing activities

          

Capital expenditures

  (10,724) (7,460) (11,126)

Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

    (2,413) (10,981)

Payments of earn-outs for businesses acquired

    (9,839)  

Transfers to restricted cash

  (76,115)    

Proceeds from the maturity of CDARS

  213,641     

Proceeds from sales of short-term investments

  32,971     

Payments for purchases of short-term investments

  (506,103) (135,000)  

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

  13  834  103 

Proceeds from disposal of segment, net of transaction fees (see Note 3)

  225,188     

Discontinued operations

  (492) (887) (1,680)
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (121,621) (154,765) (23,684)

Financing activities

          

Proceeds from stock option exercises

  45,164  12,586  681 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

    130,086   

Restricted stock tax withholdings

  (4,619) (607) (1,019)

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

  23,271     

Purchases of treasury stock

  (38,098)    

Repayments of long-term debt

  (213) (196) (32,659)
        

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  25,505  141,869  (32,997)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (1,466) (163) (867)
        

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  96,632  45,979  (14,354)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  148,500  102,521  116,875 
        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $245,132 $148,500 $102,521 
        

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

          

Interest paid

 $4,727 $4,935 $6,530 

Income taxes paid

  9,925  1,808  3,215 

Non-cash investing and financing activities

          

Accrual of payment for net assets of businesses acquired

 $ $1,000 $ 

Accrual of contingent earn-out payment to former shareholders of acquired company

      9,644 

Transfers from property, plant and equipment to inventory

  3,913  1,159  404 

Transfers from inventory to property, plant and equipment

  850  23  385 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 20082010

1.     Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

Business

        Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, "Veeco," the "Company" or "we") designs, manufactures and manufactures enabling solutions for customers in the high brightnessmarkets equipment to develop and manufacture light emitting diodediodes ("HB-LED"LEDs"), solar data storage, semiconductor, scientific researchpanels, hard-disk drives and industrial markets.other devices. We have leading technology positions in each of our three reportabletwo segments: LEDLight Emitting Diode ("LED") & Solar Process Equipment,and Data Storage Process Equipment, and Metrology.Storage.

        In our LED & Solar segment, we design and manufacture metal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, and sources, and other types ofCopper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide ("CIGS") deposition systems such as web coaters, whichand thermal deposition sources that we sell to manufacturers of HB-LEDs,high brightness LEDs ("HB LED") and solar cells and telecommunications devices andpanels, as well as to universities and scientific research centers.customers.

        In our Data Storage segment, we design and manufacture ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing productssystems that we primarily used to create thin film magnetic heads ("TFMHs") that read and write data on hard disk drives.

        InWe support our Metrology segment, we designcustomers through product development, manufacturing, sales and manufacture atomic force microscopes ("AFMs")service sites in the U.S., stylus profilers, and optical interferometers used to provide critical surface measurements in research and production environments. Our broad line of AFMs, scanning probe microscopes ("SPMs"), optical interferometers, and stylus profilers are used in universities, research facilities and scientific centers worldwide. In production environments such as semiconductor, data storageKorea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and other industries, our metrology instruments enable customers to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality.locations.

Basis of Presentation

        Consistent with prior years, weWe report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 20082010 interim quarter ends were March 30,28, June 29,27 and September 28.26. The 20072009 interim quarter ends were April 1, July 1,March 29, June 28 and September 30.27. For ease of reference, we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30 and September 30 in our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management include allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, purchase accounting allocations, recoverability and useful lives of property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets, recoverability of goodwill, recoverability of deferred tax assets, liabilities for product warranty, accruals for contingencies and share-basedequity-based payments, including forfeitures and liabilities for tax uncertainties. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

        The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Veeco and its subsidiaries. Intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

Principles of Consolidation

        The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Veeco, our subsidiaries, and a variable interest entity, of which we are the primary beneficiary. Intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue based on current accounting guidance provided inby the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff("SEC") and the Financial Accounting Bulletin No. 104,Revenue RecognitionStandards Board ("FASB"). Our revenue transactions include sales of products under multiple-element arrangements. Revenue under these arrangements is allocated to each element based upon its estimated fair market value, in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.value.

        We consider a broad array of facts and circumstances when evaluating each of our sales arrangements in determining when to recognize revenue, including specific terms of the purchase order, contractual obligations to the customer, the complexity of the customer's post-delivery acceptance provisions, customer creditworthiness and the installation process. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,Management also considers the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectibility is reasonably assuredparty responsible for installation, whether there are process specification requirements which need to be demonstrated before final sign off and no uncertainties exist regarding customer acceptance. For transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either atpayment, whether Veeco can replicate the time of shipment or delivery,field testing conditions and procedures in our contractual arrangementsfactory and our past experience with customers do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions.demonstrating and installing a particular system. Sales arrangements are reviewed on a case-by-case basis; however, our products generally fall into one of two categories; either instruments or systems, for which we have establishedthe Company's revenue recognition protocolsprotocol for established systems is as described below.

        Instruments—Standard products produced according to our published specifications, principally metrology instruments sold typically to universities, research facilities and scientific centers and in general industrial applications where installation is inconsequential or perfunctory and no substantive customer acceptance provisions exist, revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer, either at time of shipment or delivery. Acceptance of the product by the customer is based upon meeting standard published specifications. Customer acceptance provisions include initial setup at the customer site, performance of functional test procedures and calibration testing of the basic features and functionality of the product. These provisions are a replication of the testing performed in our facilities prior to shipment. The skills and equipment required to complete installation of such instruments are not specialized and are readily available in the market and are often performed by distributors or representative organizations.

        Systems—Process equipment systems and certain metrology systems, which are sold to manufacturers in the data storage, LED, solar and semiconductor industries and are used in manufacturing facilities and commercial production environments typically include process acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. We are generally required to install these products and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer's facility. Generally, based upon the terms of the sales arrangement, these products are sold with a retention (typically 10% to 20% of the sales contract value) which is payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance is completed. Such installations are not considered complex and are not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment because they do not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complex interfaces or connections. Installation normally represents only 2% - 4% of the fair value of the sales contract. Sales arrangements for these


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008

systems are accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-21, as the Company bifurcates transactions into separate units of accounting or elements based on objective evidence of fair value. The two elements are the system and installation of the system. The amount of revenue allocated to each element is based upon its relative fair value. The price charged when the system or installation service is sold separately generally determines fair value. The value of the installation service is based upon the fair value of the service performed, including labor, which is based upon the estimated time to complete the installation at hourly rates, and material components. We recognize revenue for the system or delivered element since the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis, there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item (i.e., the installation service) and delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control, based on our historical experience. The value of the undelivered element is the greater of the fair value of the installation or the portion of the sales price that will not be received until the installation is completed (i.e., the retention amount).        System revenue is generally recognized upon shipment or delivery provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer.customer, evidence of an arrangement exists, prices are contractually fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and there are no material uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. Revenue from installation services is recognized at the time acceptance is received from the customer. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales arrangement is deferred until the criteria have been met or all elements have been delivered to the customer or been completed.

        For those transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either at the time of shipment or delivery, our sales and contractual arrangements with customers do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions. In the rare instances where such provisions are included, the Company defers all revenue until customer acceptance is achieved. In cases where products are sold with a retention of 10% to 20%, which is typically payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance provisions are completed, the customer has the right to withhold this payment until such provisions have been achieved. We defer the greater of the retention amount or the fair value of the installation on systems that we recognize revenue at the time of shipment or delivery.

        For new products, new applications of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting customeragreed upon specifications at the customer site, revenue is deferred as deferred profit in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and fully recognized upon completion of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance. Since title

        Our systems are principally sold to goodsmanufacturers in the HB-LED, the data storage and solar industries. Sales arrangements for these systems generally passesinclude customer acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. Prior to shipment a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning within agreed upon shipmentspecifications. Such source inspection or delivery and 80%test data replicates the acceptance testing that will be performed at the customer's site prior to 90%final acceptance of the contract amount becomes payable at that time, inventory is relievedsystem. Customer acceptance provisions include reassembly and accounts receivable is recognized forinstallation of the amount billedsystem at the timecustomer site, which includes performing functional or mechanical test procedures (i.e. hardware checks, leak testing,


Table of shipment. The profit onContents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010


gas flow monitoring and quality control checks of the amount billed forbasic features of the product.) Additionally, a material demonstration process may be performed to validate the functionality of the product. Upon meeting the agreed upon specifications the customer approves final acceptance of the product.

        Veeco generally is required to install these transactionsproducts and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer's facility. Such installations typically are not considered complex and the installation process is deferrednot deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment because it does not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complex interfaces or connections. We have a demonstrated history of completing such installations in a timely, consistent manner and recognized as deferred profitcan reliably estimate the costs of such. In such cases, the test environment at our facilities prior to shipment replicates the customer's environment. While there are others in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.industry with sufficient knowledge about the installation process for our systems as a practical matter, most customers engage the Company to perform the installation services.

        In Japan, generally where our contractual terms with customers generally specify risk of loss and title transfers upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon receipt of written customer acceptance.

        Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term. Component and spare part revenue is recognized at the time of shipment or delivery in accordance with the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. Such items may include cash in operating bank accounts, liquid money market accounts, treasury bills, commercial paper, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insured corporate bonds and certificates of deposit placed through an account registry service ("CDARS") with maturities of three months or less when purchased. CDARS, commercial paper and treasury bills classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair market value.

Short-Term Investments

        We determine the appropriate balance sheet classification of our investments at the time of purchase and evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These securities include FDIC insured corporate bonds, treasury bills, commercial paper and CDARS with maturities of greater than three months when purchased in principal amounts that, when aggregated with interest to accrue over the term, will not exceed FDIC limits. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income (loss) and reported in equity. Net realized gains and losses are included in net income (loss) attributable to Veeco.

Concentration of Credit Risk

        Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Companyus to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and, where appropriate, require that letters of credit be provided on certain foreign sales arrangements. The Company maintainsWe maintain allowances for potential credit losses and invests cash and cash equivalents with strong, higher credit quality issuers and continuously monitors the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.make


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


investments with strong, higher credit quality issuers and continuously monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.

Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work in process, finished goods, and spare parts and other service inventory. Obsolete or slow-moving inventory, based upon historical usage or inventory in excess of management's estimated usage for the next 12 months' requirements is written down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management's estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of excess inventory.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

        We account for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives in accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwillrelevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,other intangible assets, which states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets.

        Pursuant to SFAS 142the aforementioned guidance we are required to determine if it is appropriate to use the operating segment, as defined under SFAS 131guidance for segment reporting, as the reporting unit, or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified fourtwo reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment. The reporting units are Data Storage Process Equipment,and LED & Solar Process Equipment, AFM and Optical Metrology. AFM and Optical Metrology comprise the Metrology operating segment.Solar. In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

        We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to the our adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

        If the carrying value of the reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008

Definite-Lived Intangible and Long-Lived Assets

        Intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, capitalized software costs, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of the core proprietary manufacturing technologies associated with the products and offerings obtained through acquisition.acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks and covenants not-to-compete are initially recorded at fair value and software licenses and deferred financing costs are initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods ranging from 2 years to 17 years.

        Costs of applying forProperty, plant and registering specific patents, as well as patent defense costsequipment are capitalized and classified as intangible assets in our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had net capitalized patent costs of $7.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively, which consist primarily of costs to successfully defend certain patents. The Companyrecorded at cost. Depreciation is amortizing these capitalized costs over the respective remaining lives of the patents. Payments received for license fees and royalties associated with patent litigation have been and will continue to be netted against the capitalized patent defense costs upon receipt (see Note 8).

        Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 86,Accounting for Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1,Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. The capitalization of software costs includes costs incurred by us in developing products that qualify for capitalization as well as costs to purchase and develop software for internal use. We capitalize costs associated with product development, coding, and testing subsequent to establishing technological feasibility of the product. Technological feasibility is established after completion of a detailed program design or working model. Capitalization of computer software costs ceases upon a product's general availability or release.

        Capitalized software development costs are included in intangible assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortizedprovided over the estimated useful lifelives of the software product starting fromrelated assets using the datestraight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of general availability. Amortization expenseleasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of $1.5 million, $1.1 million, and $0.8 million related to capitalized costs incurred in developing products in our Metrology segment is included in costthe remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of sales in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

        The Company has capitalized certain costs associated with implementing our company-wide integrated applications software, which are included in intangible assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such costs are being depreciated over seven years and include consulting fees and employee time spent on software configuration and interface, coding, installation and testing, as well as the purchase of new computer equipment. Data conversion costs, training and maintenance fees associated with this integrated applications software implementation are expensed as incurred.improvements.

        Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

        Depreciation and amortizationCost Method of Accounting for Investments

        Investee companies not accounted for under the consolidation or the equity method of accounting are generally computed usingaccounted for under the straight-linecost method and are charged to operations overof accounting. Under this method, the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesserCompany's share of the useful lifeearnings or losses of such investee companies is not included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet or Statement of Operations. However, impairment charges are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If circumstances suggest that the value of the leasehold improvement and the lease term.investee company has subsequently recovered, such recovery is not recorded.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        We believe the carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, reflected in the consolidated financial statements approximate fair value due to their short termshort-term maturities. The fair value of our debt, including current maturities, is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on the estimated current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of securities or based on market value for our publicly traded debt (see Note 5)7).


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

Derivative Financial Instruments

        We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on earnings and cash flows. In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In order to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known foreign currency exposures, we enter into monthly forward contracts. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our forward contracts doare not expected to subject us to material risks due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset exchange gains and losses on the underlying assets and liabilities; both theliabilities. The forward contracts and the underlying assets and liabilities are marked-to-market through earnings. We conduct our derivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions in an effort to mitigate any material credit risk.

        The aggregate foreign currency exchange gain (loss) included in determining consolidated results of operations was approximately $0.1$1.3 million, ($0.5)$(0.7) million and ($0.3)$(0.1) million in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. Included in the aggregate foreign currency exchange gain (loss) were lossesgains (losses) relating to forward contracts of $1.0 million, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million and ($0.4) million in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. These amounts were recognized and are included in other, income, net.net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        As of December 31, 2008,2010, approximately $0.9 million of losses related to forward contracts were included in accrued expenses and these amounts were subsequently paid in January 2009. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $0.1$0.3 million of gains related to forward contracts were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and cash in the amount equivalent to such gains waswere subsequently received in January 2008. On2011. As of December 27, 2007, we entered into31, 2009, approximately $0.2 million of gains related to forward contracts for the month ofwere included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and were subsequently received in January 2008 for the notional amount of approximately $7.0 million. The fair values of these2010. Monthly forward contracts at inception were zero, which did not significantly change at December 31, 2007. A monthly forward contract forwith a notional amount of $0.5$18.5 million, for the month of January 2009 was not entered into untilin December 2010 for January 2009.2011, will be settled in January 2011.

        The weighted average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2010 was approximately $6.2 million.

Translation of Foreign Currencies

        Certain of our international subsidiaries operate primarily using local functional currencies. Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.SU.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts and cash flow items are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the respective periods. Net exchange gains or losses resulting


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


from the translation of foreign financial statements and the effect of exchange rates on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a separate component of stockholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any foreign currency gains or losses related to transactions are included in operating results.

Environmental Compliance and Remediation

        Environmental compliance costs include ongoing maintenance, monitoring and similar costs. Such costs are expensed as incurred. Environmental remediation costs are accrued when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the cost can be reasonably estimated.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

        Our accumulated other comprehensive income of $7.2$5.8 million and $5.3$7.1 million at December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively, consists primarily of foreign currency translation adjustments.

Research and Development Costs

        Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and include expenses for the development of new technology and the transition of technology into new products or services.

Warranty Costs

        We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide for our products and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

Income Taxes

        As part of the process of preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

        We record valuation allowances in order to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

        Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

Advertising Expense

        The cost of advertising is expensed as of the first showing of each advertisement. We incurred $3.1$1.5 million, $3.3$0.7 million and $3.5$1.3 million in advertising costsexpenses during 2010, 2009 and 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

Royalties

        We have licensing arrangements with a number of third parties under which we use patents of such third parties. Royalties and license fees expensed under these agreements approximated $0.5 million, $2.0 million, and $1.5 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, and are included in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Shipping and Handling Costs

        Shipping and handling costs are costs that are incurred to move, package and prepare our products for shipment and then to move the products to the customer's designated location. These costs are generally comprised of payments to third-party shippers. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in our consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008Operations.

Share-BasedEquity-Based Compensation

        Share-basedEquity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and expected option life.term.

        The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical and future expectation of dividend payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and expected option lifeterm assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.

        We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical volatility, calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and implied volatility, utilizing market data of actively traded options on our common stock, which are obtained from public data sources. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

        The expected option term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

        We estimate forfeitures using its historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

        With regard to the weighted-averageexpected option lifeterm assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157" ("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The measurement and disclosure requirements related to financial assets and financial liabilities were effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements when it is applied to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities beginning in the first quarter of 2009, including periodic


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


fair value measurements for goodwill, long-lived assets and restructuring liabilities. The resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157 after adoption may be different from the fair values that would have been calculated under previous guidance.Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        Business Combinations:    In December 2007,2010, the FASB issued Statementamended guidance related to Business Combinations. The amendments affect any public entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)")the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and Statementamount of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interestsmaterial, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in Consolidated Financial Statements—an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS 160"). Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquiredreported pro forma revenue and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date at fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) also changes the accounting treatmentearnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for certain other items that relate to business combinations. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will assess the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements if and when an acquisition occurs.

        Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:    In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. The amendments modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        Subsequent Events:    The FASB has issued amended guidance for subsequent events. The amendment removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC's literature. All of the amendments were effective upon issuance (February 24, 2010). The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        Fair Value Measurements:    In January 1, 2009.2010, the FASB issued amended guidance for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This update requires some new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. The purpose of SFAS 160FASB's objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the relevance, comparability, and transparency of thein financial informationreporting. Specifically, this update requires that a reporting entity providesdisclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in itsand out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010


separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, this update clarifies the requirements of existing disclosures. For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update was adopted on January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The most significant provisions of this statement result in changes to the presentation of noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 isThose disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement will impact the manner in which we present noncontrolling interests, but will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments2010, and Hedging Activities ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and requires comparative disclosures only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS 161 will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1,Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) ("FSP APB 14-1"). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. FSP APB 14-1Early application is permitted. The Company does not believe that this guidance will require issuershave a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        Revenue Recognition:    In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to multiple-element arrangements which requires an entity to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of convertible debt that can be settled in cashan arrangement to separately account for (i.e. bifurcate) a portionall of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This update eliminates the use of the debt associated withresidual method of allocation and requires the conversion feature and reclassify this portionrelative-selling-price method in all circumstances. All entities must adopt the guidance no later than the beginning of their first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Entities may elect to stockholders' equity. The liability portion, which representsadopt the fair value of the debt without the conversion feature, is accreted to its face value over the life of the debt usingguidance through either prospective application for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified, after the effective interest method, with the accretion recordeddate or through retrospective application to interest expense. FSP APB 14-1 will be applied retrospectively toall revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The cumulative effect ofCompany does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In October 2009, the change in accounting principleFASB issued amended guidance that is expected to significantly affect how entities account for revenue arrangements that contain both hardware and software elements. As a result, many tangible products that rely on periods prior to those presentedsoftware will be recognized as ofaccounted for under the revised multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance, rather than the software revenue recognition guidance. The revised guidance must be adopted by all entities no later than fiscal years beginning ofon or after June 15, 2010. An entity must select the firstsame transition method and same period presented. We expectfor the adoption of FSP APB 14-1both this guidance and the revisions to the multiple-element arrangements guidance noted above. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material effectimpact on ourits consolidated financial position, results of operations, and earnings per share. During the second quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") that may be settled in cash upon conversion and are subject to the requirements of FSB APB 14-1. As of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 in the beginning of 2009, effective as of date of issuance of the New Notes, we will reclassify approximately $16.3 million from long-term debt to additional paid-in capital, and our accumulated deficit will reflect approximately $4.8 million of debt accretion that occurred between the issuance date of the New Notes and the adoption date. Approximately $2.8 to $3.3 million of additional interest expense will be recorded annually from the adoption date through the maturity date of the New Notes. This additional interest expense will not require the use of cash.statements.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

2.     Income (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share Attributable to Veeco

        The following table sets forth basic and diluted net income (loss) income per common share and the reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding (share amounts (in thousands)thousands, except per share data):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Net (loss) income per common share

 $(2.27)$(0.56)$0.49 

Diluted net (loss) income per common share

 $(2.27)$(0.56)$0.48 

Weighted average shares outstanding

  31,347  31,020  30,492 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards and units

      567 
        

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  31,347  31,020  31,059 
        

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Net income (loss)

 $361,760 $(15,632)$(75,421)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

    (65) (230)
        

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 $361,760 $(15,567)$(75,191)
        

Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

          

Basic

 $9.16 $(0.48)$(2.40)
        

Diluted

 $8.51 $(0.48)$(2.40)
        

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

  39,499  32,628  31,347 

Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards and units and convertible debt

  3,015     
        

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  42,514  32,628  31,347 
        

        (Loss) earningsBasic income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The effect of approximately 170,000761,000 and 326,000170,000 common equivalent shares for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively, were excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding due to the net losses sustained for these periods. No shares were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2010.

        In December 2001 andAt January 2002,1, 2008 we issued a total of $220.0 million ofhad unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 2008, which were convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, into shares of common stock at$25.2 million having a conversion price of $38.51 per share. During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of the notes, and for the year ended December 31, 2006, the assumed conversion of the remaining $200.0 million of notes was 5.3 million common equivalent shares, which were anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for that period. The repurchase and the exchange reduced the effect on earnings per share of the assumed conversion of the Old Notes (as defined below), which was calculated using the "if converted" method of accounting.

        During 2007, we repurchased an additional $56.0 million of these notes, and issued a new series of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") due April 15, 2012, pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of our outstanding 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the "Old Notes"). In total, we exchanged $118.8 million of Old Notes for $117.8 million of New Notes. Of the original notes, $25.2 million remained outstanding subsequent to the exchange. which was due and subsequently paid in December 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the weighted-average effect of2008, the assumed conversion of the Old Notes was approximately 1.80.5 million shares, and at December 31, 2007,common equivalent shares. Due to the effect ofnet loss reported for the assumed conversion ofperiod, the Old Notes was approximately 0.6 million shares. The convertible shares wereare anti-dilutive and, therefore, wereare not included in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2007. During2008.

        At January 1, 2008 we had new unsecured convertible subordinated notes of $117.8 million having a conversion price of $27.23 per share (the "New Notes") of which $12.2 million was repurchased in the fourth quarter of 2008, we paid the remaining $25.2 million of Old Notes outstanding.

2008. The New Notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, as long as we have the ability and the intent to settle the principal amount of the New Notes in cash. Under the terms of the New Notes, we may pay the principal


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


amount of converted New Notes in cash or in shares of common stock. We have indicated that we intend to pay such amounts in cash. Using the treasury stock method, the impact of the assumed conversion of the New Notes had a dilutive affect of 1.2 million shares for the year ended December 31, 2010 and was anti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, as the


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010


average stock price was below the conversion price of $27.23 for the period. The effect of the assumed converted shares is dependent on the stock price at the time of the conversion. The maximum number of shares that can be issued upon conversion of the New Notes were 5.4 million common equivalent shares issuable upon conversion at December 31, 2007 was approximately 6.0 million. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we repurchased $12.2 million of New Notes, and for the yearyears ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (see Note 7).

3.     Discontinued Operations

        On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker Corporation ("Bruker") comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology's operating results are accounted for as discontinued operations in determining the assumed conversionconsolidated results of operations and the related assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for all periods presented. The sales transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. As part of our agreement with Bruker, $22.9 million of proceeds is held in escrow and is restricted from use for one year from the closing date of the remaining $105.6transaction to secure certain specified losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we made in the stock purchase agreement and related documents. As part of the sale we incurred transaction costs, which consisted of investment bank fees and legal fees, totaling $5.2 million. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $156.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain of these notes was 5.3$5.4 million common equivalent shares. See Note 5related to the assets in China.

        The following is a summary of the net assets sold as of the closing date on October 7, 2010(in thousands):

 
 October 7, 2010 

Assets

    

Accounts receivable, net

 $21,866 

Inventories

  26,431 

Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

  13,408 

Goodwill

  7,419 

Other assets

  5,485 
    

Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

 $74,609 
    

Liabilities

    

Accounts payable

 $7,616 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  5,284 
    

Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

 $12,900 
    

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

        Summary information related to discontinued operations is as follows (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Net sales

 $92,011 $97,737 $127,874 

Cost of sales

  47,822  57,410  74,551 
        

Gross profit

  44,189  40,327  53,323 

Total operating expenses

  45,024  43,030  77,741 
        

Operating loss

 $(835)$(2,703)$(24,418)
        

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 $101,229 $(1,403)$24,588 
        


 
 December 31,  
 
 
 2010 2009  
 

Assets

          

Cash

 $ $89    

Accounts receivable, net

    16,812    

Inventories

    21,757    

Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

    14,682    

Goodwill

    7,419    

Other assets

    9,327    
         

Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

 $ $70,086    
         

Liabilities

          

Accounts payable

 $ $4,202    

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  5,359  6,622    
         

Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

 $5,359 $10,824    
         

4.     Fair Value Measurements

        We have categorized our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based upon the fair value hierarchy. The levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:

        In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, we categorize such assets or liabilities based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a


Table of Contents

3.
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset.

        Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category presented below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in historical company data) inputs.

        The major categories of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis, at fair value, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in millions):

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

Treasury bills

 $136.2 $79.5 $ $215.7 

FDIC insured corporate bonds

  129.4      129.4 

Commercial paper

  128.6  62.8    191.4 

Money market instruments

    0.6    0.6 

Derivative instrument

    0.3    0.3 
          
 

Total

 $394.2 $143.2 $ $537.4 
          


 
 December 31, 2009 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

CDAR's

 $ $180.0 $ $180.0 

Derivative instrument

    0.2    0.2 
          
 

Total

 $ $180.2 $ $180.2 
          

        CDARS, commercial paper and treasury bills that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value. Accordingly, no gains or losses (realized/unrealized) have been incurred for cash equivalents. All investments classified as available-for-sale contain quoted prices in active markets.

        Derivative instruments include foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency transactions. Derivative instruments are valued using standard calculations/models that are primarily based on observable inputs, including foreign currency exchange rates, volatilities and interest rates.

        The major categories of assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis, at fair value, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in millions):

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $ $ $42.3 $42.3 

Goodwill

      52.0  52.0 

Intangible assets, net

      16.9  16.9 

Restructuring liability

      (1.0) (1.0)
          
 

Total

 $ $ $110.2 $110.2 
          

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010


 
 December 31, 2009 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $ $ $44.7 $44.7 

Goodwill

      52.0  52.0 

Intangible assets, net

      21.8  21.8 

Asset retirement obligation

      (0.2) (0.2)

Restructuring liability

      (2.4) (2.4)
          
 

Total

 $ $ $115.9 $115.9 
          

5.     Business Combinations

Mill Lane Engineering Co., Inc.

        On May 22, 2008, we acquired Mill Lane Engineering Co., Inc. ("Mill Lane"), a privately held manufacturer of web coating systems for flexible solar panels, for a purchase price of $11.0 million, net of cash acquired, plus potential future earn-out payments of up to $19.0 million (representing additional purchase price) contingent upon the future achievement of certain operating performance criteria. Fees related to the acquisition were $0.7 million. Mill Lane is based in Lowell, Massachusetts and at the time of acquisition had approximately 20 employees. The financial results of Mill Lane has been renamed Veeco Solar and its financial results are included in our LED & Solar Process Equipment segment (see Note 9)11) as of the acquisition date. We have determined that this acquisition does not constitute a material business combination and therefore are not including pro forma financial statements in this report.

        As of December 31, 2008, we havehad accrued $9.6 million for our earn-out obligation due to the former owners of Mill Lane resulting from the achievement of certain operating performance criteria earned through the end of the fourth quarter of 2008. Payment of this earn-out will beobligation was made in the first quarter of 2009. As of December 31, 2010, no earn-out obligations remain under this purchase arrangement.

6.     Balance Sheet Information

Fluens CorporationShort-term Investments

        In 2006, we invested $0.5 million to purchase 19.9%        Available-for-sale securities consist of the common stock of Fluens Corporation ("Fluens"following (in thousands). Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Veeco and Fluens have jointly developed a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications. If this development is successful and upon:

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Gains in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Income
 Losses in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Income
 Estimated
Fair Value
 

Commercial paper

 $128,527 $61 $ $128,588 

FDIC insured corporate bonds

  129,353  24    129,377 

Treasury bills

  136,203  12    136,215 
          
 

Total available-for-sale securities

 $394,083 $97 $ $394,180 
          

        During the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, we will be obligated to purchase the balance of the outstanding stock of Fluens for $3.5 million plus an earn-out payment based on future performance. In addition, until May 2009 we may elect to waive these conditions and purchase the remaining 80.1% of outstanding stock of Fluens on the same terms.

        We determined that Fluens is a variable interest entity and that we are its primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46(R),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003)—an interpretation of ARB No. 51, which requires us to consolidate the results of Fluens' operations from the acquisition date. As such, Fluens' results of operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and2010, available-for-sale securities were sold for total proceeds of $246.6 million. The gross realized gains on these sales were minimal for the period from May 1, 2006 throughyear ended December 31, 2006, are included within2010. For purpose of determining gross realized gains, the Data Storage Process Equipment segment in the accompanying Consolidated Statementscost of Operations, and we have attributed the 80.1% portion of Fluens that we do not ownsecurities sold is based on specific identification. The net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities amounted to noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As part of the acquisition accounting, we recorded $1.2 million of


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


in-process technology, which was written off during 2006. Fluens' results$0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and has been included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

        Contractual maturities of operations prioravailable-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):

 
 Estimated
Fair Value
 

Due in one year or less

 $216,244 

Due in 1-2 years

  177,936 
    
 

Total investments in debt securities

 $394,180 
    

        Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to the acquisition were not material to the Consolidated Statements of Operations.call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Restricted Cash

        As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the balance2010, restricted cash consists of noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet was $0.8$22.9 million and $1.0 million. The total net loss attributablethat relates to the noncontrolling interestproceeds received from the sale of our Metrology segment. This cash is held in Fluensescrow and is restricted from use for one year from the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,closing date of the transaction (see Note 3). Additionally, restricted cash also consists of $53.2 million which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance that the Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is held in custody by the issuing bank, and 2006 was $0.2 million, $0.6 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.

4.     Balance Sheet Information (in thousands)is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.

Inventories

 
 December 31,  
 
 2008 2007  
 

Raw materials

 $57,815 $58,157  
 

Work in process

  28,733  27,330  
 

Finished goods

  8,382  13,107  
       

 $94,930 $98,594  
       

 
 December 31,  
 
 2010 2009  
 

Raw materials

 $49,953 $34,214  
 

Work in process

  33,181  17,908  
 

Finished goods

  25,353  3,685  
       

 $108,487 $55,807  
       

Property, Plant and Equipment

 
 December 31,  
 
 Estimated
Useful Lives
 
 2008 2007
 

Land

 $9,274 $9,274  
 

Buildings and improvements

  43,743  41,386 10-40 years
 

Machinery and equipment

  105,194  102,997 3-10 years
 

Leasehold improvements

  5,163  7,404 3-7 years
       
 

Gross property, plant, and equipment at cost

  163,374  161,061  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  99,002  94,919  
       

Net property, plant, and equipment at cost

 $64,372 $66,142  
       

 
 December 31,  
 
 Estimated
Useful Lives
 
 2010 2009
 

Land

 $7,274 $7,274  
 

Buildings and improvements

  30,731  30,707 10-40 years
 

Machinery and equipment

  73,173  71,358 3-10 years
 

Leasehold improvements

  2,276  3,548 3-7 years
       
 

Gross property, plant, and equipment at cost

  113,454  112,887  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  71,134  68,180  
       

Net property, plant, and equipment at cost

 $42,320 $44,707  
       

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

        For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, depreciation expense was $12.9$8.0 million, $13.6$8.7 million and $13.2$8.8 million, respectively.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

        In accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwillthe relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,other intangible assets, we conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarters of 20082010 and 2007,2009, using October 1st as our measurement date, and utilizing a discounted future cash flow approach as described in Note 1. This was consistent with the approach used in previous years. Based upon the results of such assessments, we determined that no goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment existed in any of its reporting units, as of October 1, 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, the economic downturn became more significant and wide ranging as credit availability tightened and overall business and economic conditions deteriorated. It became apparent that the revenue, profitability, growth and other assumptions we used        Changes in our fair value determination at October 1, 2008, required revisions. Additionally,goodwill are as follows (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Balance as of January 1

 $52,003 $51,741 

Acquisition

    262 
      

Balance as of December 31

 $52,003 $52,003 
      

        As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we realized a significanthad $2.9 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets consisting of trademarks and tradenames, which are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets in the caption intangible assets, net.

Intangible Assets

 
 December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 
 Purchased
technology
 Other
intangible
assets
 Total
intangible
assets
 Purchased
technology
 Other
intangible
assets
 Total
intangible
assets
 

Gross intangible assets

 $98,473 $22,734 $121,207 $98,473 $22,734 $121,207 

Less accumulated amortization

  (86,376) (17,938) (104,314) (83,352) (16,085) (99,437)
              

Intangible assets, net

 $12,097 $4,796 $16,893 $15,121 $6,649 $21,770 
              

        The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

2011

 $4,054 

2012

  3,154 

2013

  1,796 

2014

  1,433 

2015

  1,334 

        In accordance with the relevant accounting guidance related to the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, we performed an analysis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 of our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets. No impairment existed in any of our reporting units.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


decline in our market capitalization which resulted in the carrying value of our net assets exceeding our market capitalization. Given these factors we were required to perform an interim goodwill impairment assessment as of December 31, 2008.

        In performing the impairment assessment as of December 31, 2008, we updated our financial forecast and growth rate assumptions based upon current market conditions and determined that the carrying amounts of our Data Storage Process Equipment and AFM reporting units were in excess of their respective estimated fair values. As such, the Company was required to allocate the estimated fair value to all assets and liabilities in these two reporting units and determined there was no implied value related to goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets. We recorded an asset impairment charge of $52.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 relating to goodwill, which consisted of $30.4 million in our Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit and $21.9 million in our AFM reporting unit, and recorded a charge of $5.0 million in our Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit relating to indefinite-lived intangible assets, pertaining to trademarks.

        Changes in our goodwill during 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

 
 2008 2007 

Balance as of January 1

 $100,898 $100,898 

Impairment

  (52,312)  

Mill Lane acquisition

  930   

Mill Lane earnout

  9,644   
      

Balance as of December 31

 $59,160 $100,898 
      

        As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had $2.9 million and $7.9 million, respectively, of indefinite-lived intangible assets consisting of trademarks and tradenames, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the caption Intangible assets, net. See Note 8 for a summary of the asset impairment charge.

Intangible Assets

 
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 
 
 Purchased
technology
 Other
intangible
assets
 Total
intangible
assets
 Purchased
technology
 Other
intangible
assets
 Total
intangible
assets
 

Gross intangible assets

 $111,033 $49,113 $160,146 $108,588 $53,426 $162,014 

Less accumulated amortization

  (92,094) (29,234) (121,328) (72,481) (29,886) (102,367)
              

Intangible assets, net

 $18,939 $19,879 $38,818 $36,107 $23,540 $59,647 
              

        The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

2009

 $8,696 

2010

  8,100 

2011

  5,387 

2012

  3,566 

2013

  2,029 

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008

        In accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we performed an analysis as of December 31, 2008 of our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets due to impairment indicators noted during the fourth quarter of 2008, pertaining to our Data Storage Process Equipment and AFM reporting units. Indications of impairment included deteriorating economic conditions, reduced orders, reduced revenue projections, and losses in our AFM reporting unit and a significant reduction in our market capitalization. No impairment indicators were present in the other two reporting units. For the purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, a long-lived asset or assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For the Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit the long-lived assets were grouped at one level below the reporting unit and at the reporting unit level for AFM. The recoverability of long-lived asset groups was measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by such assets. Developing the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows requires significant judgment and projection of future financial performance, including projection of future revenue and expenses, working capital requirements and the time period in which the assets will be utilized. We used the economic life of the primary asset in the long-lived asset group to determine the forecast period of the future cash flows. For the AFM reporting unit, we analyzed long-lived assets with a carrying value of $27.8 million (consisting of $16.6 million of property, plant and equipment and $11.2 million of intangible assets principally patent defense and capitalized software costs) at December 31, 2008 for impairment and determined that no impairment existed. For the Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit, we analyzed long-lived assets with a carrying value of $38.6 million at December 31, 2008 for impairment and determined that no impairment existed for one of the identifiable long-lived asset groups with a carrying value of $12.8 million (consisting principally of property, plant and equipment). Since the carrying amount of long-lived assets within the other identifiable asset group exceeded the estimated future cash flows of such assets, an impairment existed. This long-lived asset group consists of intangible assets of $24.0 million (primarily purchased technology) and $1.8 million of property, plant and equipment pertaining to its mechanical processing product line of Saws and Lappers. The amount of the impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of the long-lived asset group to the carrying value. As permitted under SFAS 144 we determined the fair value of our long-lived asset groups utilizing a discounted cash flow approach applying a risk free interest rate. The carrying value of the long-lived assets exceeded the fair value by $15.7, million which was recorded as an impairment charge and was allocated on a pro rata basis to the long-lived assets with $14.6 million allocated to intangible assets and $1.1 million allocated to property, plant and equipment. We currently expect to recover the remaining carrying value of the asset group of $10.1 million by cash flows generated by the use of the assets over their remaining useful life. See Note 8 for a summary of the asset impairment charge.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

Accrued Expenses

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Payroll and related benefits

 $20,059 $17,066 

Sales, use, and other taxes

  2,776  3,846 

Customer deposits and advanced billings

  18,021  19,558 

Warranty

  6,892  6,502 

Restructuring reserve

  3,568  4,318 

Contingent earn-out payment

  9,644   

Other

  6,004  8,911 
      

 $66,964 $60,201 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Payroll and related benefits

 $27,374 $20,245 

Sales, use, income and other taxes

  4,914  3,287 

Customer deposits and advanced billings

  129,225  59,758 

Warranty

  9,238  6,675 

Restructuring liability

  714  2,451 

Other

  11,545  7,407 
      

 $183,010 $99,823 
      

Accrued Warranty

        We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide for our products and recognize a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liability include product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Changes in our warranty liability during the periodyear are as follows:

 
 2008 2007 

Balance as of beginning of year

 $6,502 $7,118 

Warranties issued during the period

  4,783  5,913 

Settlements made during the period

  (4,393) (6,529)
      

Balance as of end of year

 $6,892 $6,502 
      

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Balance as of the beginning of year

 $6,675 $5,533 

Warranties issued during the year

  9,695  4,777 

Settlements made during the year

  (7,132) (3,635)
      

Balance as of the end of year

 $9,238 $6,675 
      

5.     Debt

Credit Agreement

        In February 2009, we entered into an amendment to our existing credit agreement with HSBC Bank USA, National Association ("HSBC"), as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"). As part of the amendment, we reduced the amount of the revolving credit facility, modified certain existing covenants and added certain new covenants. In addition, the commitment fees and interest rate were increased. As amended, the Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit borrowings of up to $30.0 million. The annual interest rate under the Credit Agreement is a floating rate equal to the prime rate of the agent bank plus 2.0%. A LIBOR-based interest rate option is also provided. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements. The Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants which include the maintenance of minimum cash balances and limitations with respect to incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of dividends, long-term leases, investments, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and sales of assets. In addition, under the Credit Agreement, we are required to satisfy certain financial tests, including minimum profitability levels. As of the effective date of the amendment, we were in compliance with all covenants. Substantially all of our assets and those of our material domestic subsidiaries, other than real estate, have been pledged to secure our obligations


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


under the Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2012. In the first quarter of 2009, we will recognize an expense of $0.2 million representing the amount of deferred financing fees equal to the portion of the revolving credit facility which was terminated in connection with the amendment. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement and letters of credit outstanding were approximately $0.4 million. Interest expense associated with the Credit Agreement recorded during 2008 and 2007 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.7. Debt

Long-term Debt

        Long-term debt is summarized as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Convertible subordinated debt

 $105,574 $142,978 

Mortgage notes payable

  3,291  3,472 

Other

    135 
      

  108,865  146,585 

Less current portion

  196  25,550 
      

 $108,669 $121,035 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Convertible subordinated debt

 $101,138 $98,081 

Mortgage notes payable

  2,883  3,095 
      

  104,021  101,176 

Less current portion

  101,367  212 
      

 $2,654 $100,964 
      

Convertible Subordinated Debt

        On December 21, 2001,At January 1, 2008 we issued $200.0 million ofhad new unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 2008 ("Old Notes"), and on January 3, 2002, we issued an additional $20.0of $117.8 million of Old Notes pursuant to the exercise of an over-allotment option. The Old Notes were convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or prior to maturity, into shares of common stock athaving a conversion price of $38.51$27.23 per share. We paid interest onshare (the "Notes") of which $12.2 million was repurchased in the Old Notes on June 21 and December 21 of each year.

        During 2006, we repurchased $20.0 million of Old Notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. During 2007, we repurchased an additional $56.0 million of Old Notes, reducing the amount of Old Notes outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million in 2007.

        During the secondfourth quarter of 2007, we issued new convertible subordinated notes (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders2008. The Notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the Old Notes. The New Notes bear interest at 4.125% per annumassumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, as long as we have the ability and mature on April 15, 2012. Under these agreements, such holders agreedthe intent to exchange $118.8 million aggregatesettle the principal amount of Oldthe Notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregatein cash. Under the terms of the Notes, we may pay the principal amount of New Notes. Followingconverted Notes in cash or in shares of common stock. We have indicated that we intend to pay such amounts in cash. Using the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2treasury stock method, the impact of the assumed conversion of the Notes had a dilutive affect of 1.2 million shares for the year ended December 31, 2010 and was anti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, as the average stock price was below the conversion price of Old Notes remained outstanding. A gross gain$27.23 for the period. The effect of approximately $1.0 million was recordedthe assumed converted shares is dependent on the exchange transactions offset bystock price at the write-offtime of approximately $1.0the conversion. The maximum number of shares that can be issued upon conversion of the Notes were 5.4 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated withcommon equivalent shares for the Old Notes.years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

        The New Notes are initially convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of New Notes (equivalent to a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for our common stock on April 16, 2007). On or after April 20, 2011, we may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. Holders may convert the New Notes


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including our common stock trading at prices equal to or above 130% overof the conversion price for at least 20 trading days during the final 30 trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2010, our common stock was trading at prices equal to or above 130% of the conversion price for the specified period and, as a specified period.result, the Notes are convertible during the first quarter of 2011. If the Notes are converted, we have the ability and intent to pay the principal balance of notes tendered for conversion in cash. We will re-perform this test each quarter up to and including the fourth quarter of 2011. Accordingly, the balance of the convertible notes at December 31, 2010 has been classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. On February 14, 2011, at the option of the holder, $7.5 million of notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $45.95 per share


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010


in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2011 we will take a charge for the related unamortized debt discount totaling $0.3 million. We pay interest on these notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The New Notes are unsecured and are effectively subordinated to all of our senior and secured indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, we paid off the remaining $25.2 million of Old Notes outstanding. In addition, we repurchased $12.2 million aggregate of the New Notes for $7.2 million in cash, of which $7.1 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest, reducing the amount outstanding from $117.8 million to $105.6 million. A gross gain of approximately $5.1 million was recorded on these repurchases offset by the write-off of approximately $0.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the New Notes.

        AtNotes, for a net gain of approximately $5.0 million. Such net gain was reduced to $3.8 million upon the application of accounting guidance (see below), which required that the gain be calculated based on the fair value of the portion repurchased as of the repurchase date. The fair value approximated the carrying value net of the unamortized discount on the portion repurchased. The difference of approximately $1.2 million between the fair value and the amount paid was recorded as a reduction in the gain originally reported, which increased the accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2008 $105.6 millionby that amount.

        As of January 1, 2009, we implemented accounting guidance related to our convertible debt and have applied it retrospectively to all periods presented, as required. This guidance requires issuers of convertible debt that can be settled in cash to separately account for (i.e., bifurcate) a portion of the Newdebt associated with the conversion feature and reclassify this portion to equity. The liability portion, which represents the fair value of the debt without the conversion feature, is accreted to its face value over the life of the debt using the effective interest method by amortizing the discount between the face amount and the fair value. The amortization is recorded as interest expense. The notes are subject to such accounting guidance since they may be settled in cash upon conversion. Thus, as a result of the adoption of this accounting guidance, we reclassified approximately $16.3 million from long-term debt to additional paid-in capital effective as of the date of issuance of the Notes. This reclassification created a $16.3 million discount on the debt that will be amortized over the remaining life of the Notes, were outstandingwhich will be through April 15, 2012. The reclassification generated a $6.7 million deferred tax liability, which we offset with a fair market value of approximately $68 million. At December 31, 2007, $25.2 millioncorresponding decrease of the Old Notes and $117.8 millionvaluation allowance by the same amount. Prior periods are presented as if the new guidance was in effect as of the New Notes were outstanding with a fair market valuedate of approximately $25issuance. Thus, we have presented all financial data for prior periods in this report as if we had reclassified the $16.3 million and $112 million, respectively.

Mortgage Notes Payable

        Long-termbegan amortizing the resultant debt atdiscount in April 2007. The retrospective application of the new guidance described above to the results for the year ended December 31, 2008 also includes a mortgage note payable, which is secured by certain land and buildings with carrying amounts aggregating approximately $5.3increased the net loss attributable to Veeco from ($71.1) million to ($75.2) million and $5.4 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.increased the loss per share attributable to Veeco from ($2.27) to ($2.40).

        The mortgage note payable ($3.3 million at December 31, 2008 and $3.5 million at December 31, 2007) bears interest at an annual ratetotal effect on equity as of 7.91%, with the final payment duedate of adoption on January 1, 2020.2009 was a net increase of $10.3 million, comprised of an increase in additional paid-in capital of $16.3 million and an increase in the accumulated deficit of $6.0 million. The fair market value$6.0 million is comprised of this note at December 31,$2.9 million and $1.9 million in amortization of the debt discount for 2008 and 2007, respectively, as well as the $1.2 million reduction in the gain that was recorded on the November 2008 repurchases.

        For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we recorded approximately $3.6$3.1 million, $2.8 million and $3.8$2.9 million, respectively.

Maturityrespectively, additional interest expense in each period resulting from the amortization of Long-term Debt

        Long-termthe debt matures as follows (in thousands):

2009

 $196 

2010

  212 

2011

  229 

2012

  105,822 

2013

  268 

Thereafter

  2,138 
    

  108,865 

Less current portion

  196 
    

 $108,669 
    

6.     Stock Compensation Plans and Shareholders' Equity

Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans

        We have several stock option and restricted stock plans. The Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2000 Plan"), was approved bydiscount. This additional interest expense did not require the Boarduse of Directors andcash.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

        The components of interest expense recorded on the Notes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Contractual interest

 $4,355 $4,356 $4,801 

Amortization of the discount on the Notes

  3,057  2,846  2,917 
        

Total interest expense on the Notes

 $7,412 $7,202 $7,718 
        

Effective interest rate

  7.0% 6.8% 6.7%
        

        The carrying amounts of the liability and equity components of the Notes as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Carrying amount of the equity component

 $16,318 $16,318 
      

Principal balance of the liability component

 $105,574 $105,574 

Less: unamortized discount

  4,436  7,493 
      

Net carrying value of the liability component

 $101,138 $98,081 
      

        At December 31, 2010 and 2009, $105.6 million of the Notes were outstanding with fair values of approximately $164.1 million and $144.6 million, respectively.

Mortgage Notes Payable

        Long-term debt as of December 31, 2010, also includes a mortgage note payable, which is secured by certain land and buildings with carrying amounts aggregating approximately $5.1 million and $5.2 million as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The mortgage note payable ($2.9 million as of December 31, 2010 and $3.1 million as of December 31, 2009) bears interest at an annual rate of 7.91%, with the final payment due on January 1, 2020. The fair market value of this note as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $3.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

Maturity of Long-term Debt

        Long-term debt matures as follows (in thousands):

2011

 $105,803 

2012

  248 

2013

  268 

2014

  290 

2015

  314 

Thereafter

  1,534 
    

  108,457 

Less current portion

  105,803*
    

 $2,654 
    

*
Difference of $4,436 from $101,367 in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is due to the unamortized debt discount.

8. Equity Compensation Plans and Equity

        We have several stock option and restricted stock plans. On April 1, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company, and on May 14, 2010, our shareholders, approved the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"). The 2010 Plan replaced the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2000 Plan"), as the Company's active stock plan. The Company's employees, directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan permits the granting of a variety of awards, including both non-qualified and incentive stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units and dividend equivalent rights. The Company is authorized to issue up to 3,500,000 shares under the 2010 Plan. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company's stock on the trading day prior to the date of grant; those option awards generally vest over a 3 year period and have a 7 or 10-year term. Restricted share awards generally vest over 4-5 years. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control, as defined in the 2010 Plan. As of December 31, 2010, there are 625,531 options outstanding under this plan.

        The 2000 Plan was approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders in May 2000. The 2000 Plan provides for the grant to officers and key employees of up to 8,530,000 stock awards, either in the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock or restricted stock awards. Up to 1,700,000 of the awards authorized under the 2000 Plan may be issued in the form of restricted stock. As of December 31, 2008, there are 525,943 shares available for future grants. Stock awards granted pursuant to the 2000 Plan expire after seven years and generally vest over a three-yeartwo-year to five-year period following the grant date. In addition, the 2000 Plan provides for automatic annual grants of 5,000 shares of restricted stock to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an employee. As of December 31, 2008,2010, there are 4,981,9171,933,623 options outstanding under this plan.

        The Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees (the "Non-Officer Plan") was approved by the Board of Directors in October 2000. The Non-Officer Plan provided for the grant of stock options to non-officer employees to purchase shares of our common stock. Stock options granted pursuant to the Non-Officer Plan become exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date and expire after seven years. As of December 31, 2008, there are 32,700 options outstanding under the Non-Officer Plan.

        The Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan") provided for the grant to officers and key employees of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock. Stock options granted pursuant to the 1992 Plan became exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date and expire after ten years. As of December 31, 2008,2010, there are 324,4091,200 stock options outstanding under this plan.

        The Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, as amended, (the "Directors' Option Plan"), provided for automatic annual grants of stock options to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an employee. Such options are exercisable immediately and expire after ten years. As of December 31, 2008, there are 84,000 options outstanding under the 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.

        The Non-Officer Plan, the 1992 Plan and the Directors' Option Plan have been frozen; and, thus, there are no options available for future grant as of December 31, 2008 under these plans.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

        In addition to the plans described above, we assumed certain stock option plans and agreements relating to the merger in September 2001 with Applied Epi, Inc. ("Applied Epi"). These stock option plans do not have options available for future grants. Options granted under these plans expire after ten years from the date of grant. Options granted under two of thethese plans vested over three years and options granted under one of thethese plans vested immediately. As of December 31, 2008,2010, there are 145,3429,272 options outstanding under the various Applied Epi plans.

        In May 2000, we assumed certain stock option plans and agreements related to CVC, Inc. ("CVC") and Commonwealth Scientific Corporation, a subsidiary of CVC, which were in effect prior to the merger with Veeco. These plans do not have options available for future grants. The options granted under these plans generally vested over a three to five year period and expire five to ten years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, there are 3,726 options outstanding under the various CVC and Commonwealth Scientific Corporation plans.

Share-BasedEquity-Based Compensation, and Stock Option and Restricted Stock Activity

        Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. The following compensation expense was included as part of continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Equity-based compensation expense

 $9,648 $7,547 $9,668 

        As a result of the sale of our Metrology segment to Bruker, equity-based compensation expense related to Metrology employees has been classified as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated statementsresults of operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006 (in thousands):

 
 Years ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Share-based compensation expense

 $10,526 $5,620 $2,219 
        

2008. For the year ended December 31, 2010, discontinued operations included compensation expense of $7.7 million that related to the acceleration of equity awards from employees that were terminated as a result of the sale of our Metrology segment to Bruker. For the year ended December 31, 2009, total equity-based compensation expense included a charge of $0.7 million for the acceleration of equity awards associated with the retirement of our former CFO. For the year ended December 31, 2008, total share-basedequity-based compensation expense included a charge of $3.0 million for the acceleration of equity awards associated with a mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with our former CEO (who currently remains as Chairman of the Board of Directors) following the successful completion of the CEO transition. For the year ended December 31, 2007, total compensation expense included a charge of $0.6 million for the modification of equity awards associated with termination agreements made with five key employees.

        As of December 31, 2008,2010, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards and option awards expected to vest is $8.8$9.0 million and $6.6$14.9 million, respectively, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 2.32.6 years bothand 2.1 years for the nonvested stock awards and for option awards.awards, respectively.

        The fair value of each option granted during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 
 Year ended December 31,
 
 2008 2007 2006

Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility

 39% 39% 40%

Weighted-average expected option life

 3 years 3 years 3 years

Average risk-free interest rate

 3.14% 4.60% 4.96%

Average dividend yield

 0% 0% 0%

 
 Year ended December 31,
 
 2010 2009 2008

Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility

 62% 65% 49%

Weighted-average expected option life

 5 years 4 years 3 years

Average risk-free interest rate

 1.92% 1.79% 3.14%

Average dividend yield

 0% 0% 0%

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

        A summary of our restricted stock awards including restricted stock units as of December 31, 2008,2010, is presented below:

 
 Shares
(000s)
 Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested at December 31, 2007

  680 $19.50 

Granted

  414  16.74 

Vested

  (378) 19.61 

Forfeited (including cancelled awards)

  (37) 17.91 
       

Nonvested at December 31, 2008

  679 $17.84 
       

 
 Shares (000's) Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested at December 31, 2009

  892 $12.97 

Granted

  186  34.97 

Vested(1)

  (365) 12.78 

Forfeited (including cancelled awards)(2)

  (97) 17.15 
       

Nonvested at December 31, 2010

  616 $19.06 
       

(1)
Includes the effect of approximately 43,383 shares whose vesting was accelerated as a result of the sale of our Metrology business.

(2)
Includes the effect of approximately 73,282 shares forfeited as a result of the sale of our Metrology business.

        During the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, we granted 334,170130,665 shares of restricted common stock and 40,15040,200 restricted stock units to key employees, which vest over three years, andor four year periods. Included in May 2008, we granted 40,000this grant were 14,518 shares of restricted common stock granted to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors throughout the year in May, June and December 2010, which vest over a periodthe lesser of one year.year or at the time of the next annual meeting. The vested shares were reduced by 61,574include the impact of 121,230 shares of restricted stock which were cancelled in 20082010 due to employees electing to receive fewer shares in lieu of paying withholding taxes. The total grant date fair value of shares that vested during the period2010 was $7.4$13.6 million.

        A summary of our stock option plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008,2010, is presented below:

 
 Shares (000s) Weighted-Average Exercise Price Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s) Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) 

Outstanding at December 31, 2007

  5,672 $23.04       

Granted

  1,286  16.98       

Exercised

  (67) 10.15       

Forfeited (including cancelled options)

  (1,319) 29.42       
             

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

  5,572 $20.29 $344  3.3 
             

Options exercisable at December 31, 2008

  3,997 $21.37 $344  2.3 
             

 
 Shares (000s) Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (000s)
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in years)
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

  4,506 $16.35       

Granted

  721  35.19       

Exercised

  (2,500) 18.07       

Forfeited (including cancelled options)

  (158) 20.47       
             

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

  2,569 $19.71 $59,807  5.9 
             

Options exercisable at December 31, 2010

  778 $16.36 $20,793  3.9 
             

        The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 2007,was $18.41, $5.35, and 2006 was $5.26, $5.68, and $7.45, respectively, per option. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $0.4 million, $0.9 million, and $4.5 million, respectively.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010


intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $53.1 million, $7.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

        The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008:2010:

 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise Prices
 Number
Outstanding at
December 31, 2008
(000s)
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 Number
Exercisable at
December 31, 2008
(000s)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 

$0.27

  57  2.0 $0.27  57 $0.27 

6.51-9.69

  40  6.9  8.10     

10.26-15.35

  198  4.3  14.60  122  14.66 

15.48-22.75

  4,450  3.6  18.91  3,011  19.41 

23.61-35.00

  722  1.5  28.18  702  28.31 

36.05-48.75

  76  1.2  47.80  76  47.80 

54.35-72.00

  29  1.7  57.11  29  57.11 
            

  5,572  3.3 $20.29  3,997 $21.37 
            

 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise Prices
 Number
Outstanding at
December 31, 2010
(000s)
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 Number
Exercisable at
December 31, 2010
(000s)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 

$0.27-8.82

  491  5.4 $8.79  122 $8.69 

9.69-15.08

  656  5.3  12.51  173  12.72 

15.29-23.55

  713  3.8  18.46  457  18.83 

23.81-36.00

  594  9.0  33.71  18  24.97 

39.85-54.35

  115  9.3  42.91  8  54.35 
            

  2,569  5.9 $19.71  778 $16.36 
            

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

        As of December 31, 2008,2010, we have reserved the following shares for future issuance related to:

Issuance upon exercise of stock options and grants of restricted stock

  6,656,0675,280,841 

Issuance upon conversion of subordinated debt

  5,350,9355,350,934 
    
 

Total shares reserved

  12,007,00210,631,775 
    

Issuance of Common Stock

        On October 28, 2009 the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement") with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (the "Underwriters"), for the sale of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, the Underwriters had an option, which they exercised in full, to purchase up to an additional 750,000 shares of our common stock on the same terms for 30 days from the date of the Underwriting Agreement, solely to cover over-allotments. On November 3, 2009, we completed this offering selling 5,750,000 shares for net proceeds totaling $130.1 million, net of transaction costs totaling $0.3 million.

Preferred Stock

        Our Board of Directors has authority under our Certificate of Incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock with voting and economic rights to be determined by the Board of Directors.


7.Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

Treasury Stock

        On August 24, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock until August 26, 2011. Repurchases are expected to be made from time to time on the open market in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The timing of repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will depend upon market conditions, SEC regulations, and other factors. The repurchases will be funded using the Company's available cash balances and cash generated from operations. The program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at the Company's discretion. During 2010, we purchased 1,118,600 shares for $38.1 million (including transaction costs) under the program at an average cost of $34.06 per share. This stock repurchase is included as treasury stock in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

9. Income Taxes

        (Loss)        Our income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interest in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Domestic

 $(78,786)$(23,946)$4,789 

Foreign

  9,385  9,610  13,729 
        

 $(69,401)$(14,336)$18,518 
        

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Domestic

 $242,305 $(15,789)$(59,777)

Foreign

  28,698  4,207  10,666 
        

 $271,003 $(11,582)$(49,111)
        

        Significant components of the provision for income taxes from continuing operations are presented below (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Current:

          

Federal

 $34,097 $(344)$(360)

Foreign

  7,720  1,879  1,019 

State and local

  4,720  799  192 
        

Total current provision for income taxes

  46,537  2,334  851 

Deferred:

          

Federal

  (32,033) 1,015  437 

Foreign

  239  (273) 359 

State and local

  (4,271) (429) 75 
        

Total deferred (benefit) provision for income taxes

  (36,065) 313  871 
        

Total provision for income taxes

 $10,472 $2,647 $1,722 
        

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

        Significant components of the provision for income taxes are presented below (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Current:

          
 

Federal

 $(360)$(13)$227 
 

Foreign

  1,078  2,239  3,310 
 

State

  199  221  168 
        

Total current provision for income taxes

  917  2,447  3,705 

Deferred:

          
 

Federal

  437  2,188  77 
 

Foreign

  463  (83) 305 
 

State

  75  (901) 872 
        

Total deferred provision for income taxes

  975  1,204  1,254 
        

Total provision for income taxes

 $1,892 $3,651 $4,959 
        

        The following is a reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) provision computed using the Federal statutory rate to our actual income tax provision (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Income tax (benefit) provision at U.S. statutory rates

 $(24,290)$(5,018)$6,481 

State income tax benefit (net of federal benefit)

  (1,128) (761) 981 

Goodwill impairment

  13,169     

Nondeductible expenses

  228  250  263 

Noncontrolling interest in acquisition

  495  219  594 

Equity compensation

  2,616  734  297 

Nondeductible compensation

  1,473  181   

Research and development tax credit

  (1,031) (1,341) (23)

Benefit of extraterritorial income exclusion

      (2,586)

Foreign operating loss currently realizable

    (2,083)  

Net change in valuation allowance

  12,457  11,414  (2,212)

Reduction in FIN 48 accrual

    (702)  

Foreign tax rate differential

  (1,256) 684  1,217 

Other

  (841) 74  (53)
        

 $1,892 $3,651 $4,959 
        

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Income tax provision (benefit) at U.S. statutory rates

 $94,851 $(4,053)$(17,189)

State income tax expense (benefit) (net of federal impact)

  5,746  188  (1,135)

Goodwill impairment

      7,985 

Nondeductible expenses

  333  145  158 

Noncontrolling interest

    28  495 

Equity compensation

    1,678  2,519 

Domestic production activities deduction

  (5,779)    

Nondeductible compensation

  2,840  826  1,473 

Research and development tax credit

  (1,823) (1,855) (1,031)

Net change in valuation allowance

  (83,079) 5,198  10,955 

Change in accrual for unrecognized tax benefits

  (1,076) (4,114)  

Foreign tax rate differential

  (5,280) 5,450  (1,419)

Other

  3,739  (844) (1,089)
        

 $10,472 $2,647 $1,722 
        

        Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

        Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Deferred tax assets:

       
 

Inventory valuation

 $15,094 $14,243 
 

Domestic net operating loss carry forwards

  31,644  39,324 
 

Tax credit carry forwards

  23,618  20,482 
 

Foreign net operating loss carry forwards

  692  234 
 

Purchased intangible assets

  7,335  1,968 
 

Warranty and installation accruals

  2,261  1,927 
 

Equity compensation

  3,175  1,987 
 

Other accruals

  3,240  4,585 
 

Other

  3,156  3,707 
      

Total deferred tax assets

  90,215  88,457 

Valuation allowance

  (82,945) (73,292)
      

Net deferred tax assets

  7,270  15,165 

Deferred tax liabilities:

       
 

Depreciation

  27  231 
 

Purchased intangible assets

  8,482  14,968 
 

DISC termination

  402  603 
 

Noncontrolling interest in acquisition

  426  426 
 

Other

  288   
      

Total deferred tax liabilities

  9,625  16,228 
      

Net deferred taxes

 $(2,355)$(1,063)
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Deferred tax assets:

       
 

Inventory valuation

 $8,999 $13,261 
 

Domestic net operating loss carry forwards

  1,219  39,312 
 

Tax credit carry forwards

  9,961  24,216 
 

Foreign net operating loss carry forwards

  147  834 
 

Purchased intangible assets

    6,662 
 

Warranty and installation accruals

  2,742  2,432 
 

Equity compensation

  3,655  4,659 
 

Other accruals

  2,063  1,654 
 

Depreciation

  1,325  1,815 
 

Other

  1,890  3,235 
      

Total deferred tax assets

  32,001  98,080 

Valuation allowance

  (1,644) (84,723)
      

Net deferred tax assets

  30,357  13,357 

Deferred tax liabilities:

       
 

Purchased intangible assets

  4,854  8,439 
 

DISC termination

    201 
 

Convertible debt discount

  1,663  3,072 
 

Undistributed earnings

  370  3,292 
 

Other

  264  287 
      

Total deferred tax liabilities

  7,151  15,291 
      

Net deferred taxes

 $23,206 $(1,934)
      

        U.S. income taxes haveA provision has not been providedmade at December 31, 2010 for approximately $8.2 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of several non-U.S. subsidiaries. We intend to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in operations outside of the U.S. If these earnings were repatriated,or additional foreign withholding taxes on approximately $39.0 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries because it is the present intention of management to permanently reinvest the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in China, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. As it is our intention to reinvest those earnings permanently, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable if they were remitted. We have provided deferred income taxes and future withholding taxes on the earnings that we anticipate will be remitted.

        We have approximately $1.5$9.2 million would be payable. No additional U.S. tax would be due based on available net operating loss andof foreign tax credit carry forwards.

        We have domestic net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $77.1 million for financial reporting purposes and $104.2 million for tax purposes, which expire at various times between 20202016 and 2025. The net2019.

        Based on current operating loss carry forward amounts differ for tax and financial reporting purposes due to the applicationresults, we reversed approximately $83.1 million of the with and without method of accounting for equity compensationvaluation allowance as provided for under SFAS No. 123(R), and the impact of unrecognizedour net deferred tax benefits established under FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 ("FIN 48"). We also have credit carry forwards of approximately $23.6 million, consisting primarily of research and development credits, which expire at various times between 2017 and 2028, and foreign tax credits, which expire between 2012 and 2018.

        Theassets became realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis. Our remaining valuation allowance of $82.9approximately $1.6 million at December 31, 2008, increased by approximately $12.5 million during 2008, principally duerelates primarily to timing differences between the bookstate and local tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and additional tax credit carry forwardsattributes for which we could not conclude were partially offsetrealizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


by a $3.1 million deferred tax liability relating to the Mill Lane acquisition. If we are able to realize part or all of the domestic deferred tax assets in future periods, we will reduce our provision for income taxes with a release of the valuation allowance in an amount that corresponds with the income tax liability generated. Our net deferred tax liability of approximately $2.4 million at December 31, 2008, principally related to a $4.6 million net deferred tax liability pertaining to our domestic operations, offset by $2.2 million of deferred tax assets pertaining to our foreign operations. Our net deferred tax liability of approximately $1.1 million at December 31, 2007, principally related to a $3.7 million net deferred tax liability pertaining to our domestic operations, offset by $2.6 million of deferred tax assets pertaining to our foreign operations.

        Under FIN 48, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of accruals, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be affected.

        For the year ended December 31, 2008 we had a net reduction of approximately $0.9 million in our accrual related to unrecognized tax benefits. As a result of applying the provisions of FIN 48, we released approximately $1.2 million of our accrual related to foreign unrecognized tax benefits during 2008 which was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase to our accrual for existing foreign unrecognized tax benefits and newly established domestic uncertain tax positions. As a result, we had approximately $1.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008, which predominantly relate to positions taken on our foreign tax returns and all of which represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate in future periods. At December 31, 2007, the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits was $1.9 million relating to foreign unrecognized tax benefits

        A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Beginning balance as of December 31

 $1,919 $2,311 

Additions for tax positions related to current year

  100  561 

Reductions for tax positions relating to current year

    (220)

Additions for tax positions relating to prior years

  244  111 

Reductions for tax positions relating to prior years

  (710) (844)

Reductions due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

  (535)  

Settlements

     
      

Ending balance as of December 31

 $1,018 $1,919 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Beginning balance as of December 31

 $1,357 $694 

Additions for tax positions related to current year

  1,227  725 

Reductions for tax positions relating to current year

     

Additions for tax positions relating to prior years

  1,736   

Reductions for tax positions relating to prior years

  (478) (62)

Reductions due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

  (17)  

Settlements

  (165)  
      

Ending balance as of December 31

 $3,660 $1,357 
      

        Of the amounts reflected in the table above at December 31, 2010, the entire amount if recognized would reduce our effective tax rate. It is our policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The total accrual for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        We or one of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. All material federal income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated in such years. All material state and local income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006. The majority of our foreign jurisdictions have been reviewed through 2008 with only a few jurisdictions having open tax years between 2005 and 2008. None of our federal tax returns are currently under examination.

10. Commitments and Contingencies and Other Matters

Restructuring and Other Charges

        During 2008 and 2009, we continued our multi-quarter plan to improve profitability and reduce and contain spending. We made progress against the initiatives that management set in 2007, respectively. Thecontinued our restructuring plan and executed activities with a focus on creating a more cost effective organization, with a greater percentage of variable costs. These activities included downsizing and consolidating some locations, reducing our workforce, consultants and discretionary expenses and realigning our sales organization and engineering groups.

        In conjunction with these activities, we recognized restructuring (credits) charges of approximately $(0.2) million, $4.8 million and $9.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and an inventory write-off of $1.5 million, included in cost of sales in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations, related to discontinued data storage products during the year


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


change in the accrual for interest and penalties decreased our tax expense by approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million during 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        Atended December 31, 2009. Restructuring expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and 2007, our deferred tax assetare as follows (in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Personnel severance and related costs

 $ $3,467 $2,614 

Lease-related and other (credits) costs

  (179) 1,370  3,873 

Modification of stock awards

      3,018 
        

 $(179)$4,837 $9,505 

Less adjustment of 2007 restructuring liability

      (81)
        

 $(179)$4,837 $9,424 
        

Personnel Severance Costs

        During 2009, we recorded $3.5 million in personnel severance and related valuation allowance excluded $5.2 million relating to unrecognized tax benefits established under FIN 48.

        We or onecosts resulting from a headcount reduction of our subsidiaries file income tax returns164 employees. This reduction in the U.S. federal jurisdictionworkforce included executives, management, administration, sales and various state, local,service personnel and foreign jurisdictions. All material federal, state and local income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2002 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated in such years. During the third quarter of 2008, the Internal Revenue Service initiated an examination of our Federal income tax return for the calendar year 2006. The majority of our foreign jurisdictions have been reviewed through 2007 with only a few jurisdictions having open tax years between 2004 and 2007. None of our tax returns are currently under examination in foreign jurisdictions.

8.    Commitments and Contingencies and Other Matters

2008 Restructuring and Other Chargesmanufacturing employees' companywide.

        During 2008, we continued our multi-quarter plan to improve profitability and reduce and contain spending. During 2008, we made progress against the initiatives that management set in 2007, continued our restructuring plan and executed activities with a focus on creating a more variable cost effective organization. These activities included downsizing and consolidating some locations, reducing our workforce, consultants and discretionary expenses and realigning our sales organization and engineering groups. In addition, due to a weakened and deteriorated business environment we have intensified and accelerated our restructuring activities. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $10.6 million and an inventory write-off of $2.9 million included in cost of sales related to legacy semiconductor products during the year ended December 31, 2008 as discussed below.

        We recorded a $3.7 million restructuring charge related to a mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with our former CEO (who currently remains as Chairman of the Board of Directors) following the successful completion of the CEO transition, which included a charge of $3.0 million for the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense and $0.7 million related to salary and other related compensation, as specified in the employment agreement. The modification of the stock awards was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. In addition, we eliminated approximately 49 employees during 2008 resulting in personnel severance costs of approximately $1.9 million, primarily in connection with increased outsourcing in our LED & Solar and Data Storage segments and realignment of the sales and service organization. This reduction in workforce included executives, management, administration and manufacturing employees' companywide.

Lease-related and Other Costs

        During 2010, we had a change in estimate relating to one of our leased Data Storage facilities. As a result, we incurred a restructuring credit of $0.2 million, consisting primarily of the remaining lease payment obligations and estimated property taxes for a portion of the facility we will occupy, offset by a reduction in expected sublease income. We made certain assumptions in determining the credit, which included a reduction in estimated sublease income and terms of the sublease as well as the estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of the remaining liability. We developed these assumptions based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates. The assumptions are based on management's best estimates, and will be adjusted periodically if new information is obtained.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

        During 2009, we vacated our Data Storage facilities in Camarillo, CA. As a result, we incurred a $1.4 million restructuring charge, consisting primarily of the remaining lease payment obligations and estimated property taxes for the facility we vacated, offset by the estimated expected sublease income to be received. We made certain assumptions in determining the charge, which included estimated sublease income and terms of the sublease as well as the estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of the liability. We developed these assumptions based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates. The assumptions are based on management's best estimates, and will be adjusted periodically if new information is obtained.

        During 2008, we recorded a $3.9 million restructuring charge for lease-related costs as part of the consolidation of our Corporatecorporate headquarters into our Plainview, New York manufacturing facility.facility during the first quarter of 2008. This charge primarily consisted of the liability for the remaining lease payments and property taxes relating to the facility we vacated, offset by expected sublease income. We made certain assumptions in determining the charge, which included estimated sublease income and terms of the sublease as well as the estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of the net cash flows. We developed these assumptions, based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates, which are adjusted periodically based upon new information, events and changes in the real estate market. In addition, we incurred a restructuring charge of $0.4 million associated with the termination of a leased facility in Santa Barbara, California that we vacated during the third quarter of 2008.

        We recorded a $3.7 million restructuring charge related to a mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with our former CEO (who currently remains as Chairman of the Board of Directors) following the successful completion of the CEO transition, which included a charge of $3.0 million for the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense and $0.7 million related to salary


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

and other related compensation, as specified in the employment agreement. The modification of the stock awards was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. In addition, we reduced approximately 74 employees or 6.0% of total employees during 2008 resulting in personnel severance costs of approximately $2.8 million, primarily in connection with increased outsourcing in our Data Storage and LED & Solar Process Equipment segments, downsizing and realignment in our Metrology segment associated with executing an operational turnaround, and realignment of the sales and service organization. This reduction in workforce included executives, management, administration and manufacturing employees companywide.

        Restructuring expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 is as follows (in thousands):

 
 Year ended
December 31,
2008
 

Lease-related and other costs

 $4,132 

Personnel severance costs

  3,493 

Modification of stock awards

  3,018 
    

  10,643 

Less adjustment of 2007 restructuring liability

  (81)
    

 $10,562 
    

        The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 restructuring charge from inception through December 31, 2008 (in thousands)2010 (in thousands):

 
 LED & Solar
Process
Equipment
 Data Storage
Process
Equipment
 Metrology Unallocated
Corporate
 Total 

Short-Term Liability

                

Lease-related costs

 $ $ $259 $1,189 $1,448 

Personnel severance charges

  732  477  879  1,405  3,493 
            

Total charged to accrual

  732  477  1,138  2,594  4,941 

Short-term/long-term Reclassification

  
  
  
  
892
  
892
 

Cash payments

  (72) (207) (604) (1,627) (2,510)
            

Balance as of December 31, 2008

 $660 $270 $534 $1,859 $3,323 
            

Long-Term Liability

                

Lease-related costs charged to accrual

 $ $ $ $2,684 $2,684 

Short-term/long-term Reclassification

        (892) (892)

Other adjustments

        (172) (172)
            

Balance as of December 31, 2008

 $ $ $ $1,620 $1,620 
            

 
 LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
Corporate
 Total 

Short-term liability

             

Lease-related and other costs 2008

 $ $ $1,189 $1,189 

Personnel severance and related costs 2008

  732  477  1,405  2,614 
          

Total charged to accrual 2008

  732  477  2,594  3,803 
          

Lease-related and other costs 2009

  190  803    993 

Personnel severance and related costs 2009

  1,005  1,826  636  3,467 
          

Total charged to accrual 2009

  1,195  2,629  636  4,460 
          

Lease-related and other (credits) costs 2010

    (87)   (87)
          

Total (credited) charged to accrual 2010

    (87)   (87)
          

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2008

      892  892 

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2009

    148  1,084  1,232 

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2010

    123  536  659 

Cash payments 2008

  (72) (207) (1,627) (1,906)

Cash payments 2009

  (1,502) (2,561) (1,982) (6,045)

Cash payments 2010

  (353) (344) (1,597) (2,294)
          

Balance as of December 31, 2010

 $ $178 $536 $714 
          

Long-term liability

             

Lease-related and other costs 2008

 $ $ $2,684 $2,684 

Lease-related and other costs 2009

    377    377 

Lease-related and other (credits) costs 2010

    (48)   (48)

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2008

      (892) (892)

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2009

    (148) (1,084) (1,232)

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2010

    (123) (536) (659)

Other adjustments

      (172) (172)
          

Balance as of December 31, 2010

 $ $58 $ $58 
          

        The balance of the 2008 restructuring accrual is expected tolong-term liability will be paid over the next eighteen months, or the remaining life of the leaseleases for the former Corporate headquarters.corporate headquarters and a former Data Storage facility, which expire in June 2011 and May 2012, respectively. We expect to continue our restructuring program in light of the overall business decline with the objective of returning the Company to profitability andcurrently do not anticipate or expect to incur additional restructuring charges throughout 2009 associated with consolidating business units, decreasing the number of manufacturing sites, implementing specific manufacturing initiatives and organizational changes, centralizing certain functions and significantly reducing the workforce across all functions of the Company. We currently expect to incur restructuring charges between $6.0 to $8.0 million in 2009.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008

        During 2008, we recorded a $73.3 million asset impairment charge, of which $73.0 million was recorded during the fourth quarter and $0.3 million was recorded during the first quarter. The fourth quarter charge consisted of $52.3 million related to goodwill ($30.4 million in our Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit and $21.9 million in our Metrology reporting unit), $19.6 million related to intangible assets ($5.0 million of indefinite-lived trademarks and $14.6 of other definite-lived intangibles in our Process Equipment Data Storage reporting unit) and $1.1 million in property, plant and equipment in our Data Storage Process Equipment reporting unit. See note 4 for more details.2011.

        The first quarter charge consisted of $0.3 million associated with property and equipment abandoned as part of the consolidation of our Corporate headquarters into our Plainview facility.

        Additionally, we recorded an inventory charge for $2.9 million (included in cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations) associated with legacy semiconductor products.

2007 Restructuring and Other Charges

        During 2007, management initiated a profit improvement plan, resulting in personnel severance costs for approximately 90 employees, or approximately 7.5% of total employees, and included management, administration and manufacturing employees companywide. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2007, we took additional measures to improve profitability, including a reduction of discretionary expenses, realignment of our sales organization to more closely match current market and regional opportunities, and consolidation of certain engineering groups within our data storage business, which included the discontinuation of two products. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, which was recorded in restructuring expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The charge consisted of the following:

 
 Year ended
December 31,
2007
 

Personnel severance costs

 $4,314 

Purchase order commitments

  1,840 

Modification of stock awards for terminated executives

  572 
    

 $6,726 
    

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

        The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the 2007 restructuring charge from inception through December 31, 2008 (in thousands)2010 (in thousands):

 
 LED & Solar
Process
Equipment
 Data Storage
Process
Equipment
 Metrology Unallocated
Corporate
 Total 

Personnel severance charges

 $34 $658 $1,497 $2,125 $4,314 

Purchase order commitments

    1,840      1,840 
            

Total charged to accrual

  34  2,498  1,497  2,125  6,154 

Cash payments during 2007

  (17) (435) (751) (633) (1,836)

Reversal of accrual during 2008

    (81)     (81)

Cash payments during 2008

  (17) (1,982) (746) (1,247) (3,992)
            

Balance as of December 31, 2008

 $ $ $ $245 $245 
            

 
 LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
Corporate
 Total 

Beginning balance at January 1, 2008

 $17 $2,063 $1,492 $3,572 

Reversal of accrual during 2008

    (81)   (81)

Cash payments during 2008

  (17) (1,982) (1,247) (3,246)

Cash payments during 2009

      (245) (245)
          

Balance as of December 31, 2010

 $ $ $ $ 
          

Asset Impairment Charges

        During the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, we recorded a charge of $0.6$0.3 million for the modification of stock awards was recorded as part of a termination agreement with each of five key employees as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The terms of the modifications included accelerated vesting and extended exercise periods. The remainder of the 2007 restructuring accrual balance is expected to be paid over the next seven months.

        Additionally during the year ended December 31, 2007, we discontinued two product lines, resulting in an inventory write-off of $4.8 million (included in cost of salesasset impairment charge in the Consolidated Statement of Operations), as well as ansecond quarter for property, plant and equipment no longer being utilized in our Data Storage reporting unit.

        During 2008, we recorded a $51.4 million asset impairment charge, of which $51.1 million was recorded during the fourth quarter and $0.3 million was recorded during the first quarter. The fourth quarter charge consisted of $30.4 million related to goodwill, $19.6 million related to intangible assets ($5.0 million of indefinite-lived trademarks and $14.6 of other definite-lived intangibles) and $1.1 million attributable to certainin property, plant and equipment in Data Storage. The first quarter charge consisted of $0.3 million associated with property and equipment associated withabandoned as part of the aforementioned product lines.consolidation of our corporate headquarters into our Plainview facility.

Minimum Lease Commitments

        Minimum lease commitments as of December 31, 20082010 for property and equipment under operating lease agreements (exclusive of renewal options) are payable as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

2009

 $5,149 

2010

  2,384 

2011

  1,194 

2012

  384 

2013

  174 

Thereafter

  85 
    

 $9,370 
    

2011

 $3,915 

2012

  2,360 

2013

  1,723 

2014

  835 

2015

  401 

Thereafter

  230 
    

 $9,464 
    

        Rent charged to operations amounted to $4.3$2.3 million, $5.3$2.0 million and $5.6$2.5 million in 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, respectively. In addition, we are obligated under such leases for certain other expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance.

Environmental Remediation

        We may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay up to $250,000 in connection with the implementation of a comprehensive plan of environmental remediation at our Plainview, New York facility. We have been indemnified by the former owner for any liabilities we may incur in excess of $250,000 with respect to


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


$250,000 with respect to any such remediation and have a liability recorded for this amount as of December 31, 2008.2009. No comprehensive plan has been required to date. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any remediation plan that may be proposed.

        We are aware that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been detected in the soil at the site of a facility formerly leased by us in Santa Barbara, California. We have been indemnified for any liabilities we may incur which arise from environmental contamination at the site. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any such liabilities.

        The former owner of the land and building in which our Santa Barbara, California in which our former Metrology operations arewere located, which business (sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010), has disclosed that there are hazardous substances present in the ground under the building. Management believes that the comprehensive indemnification clause that iswas part of the purchase contract relating to the purchase of such land provides adequate protection against any environmental issues that may arise. We have provided Bruker indemnification as part of the sale.

Litigation

        Three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against our directors and certain of our officers in March and April of 2005 in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action asserted that our directors and certain of our officers breached fiduciary duties in connection with the improper accounting transactions which we had discovered at our TurboDisc business unit which led to the restatement in March 2005 of our financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and a securities class action lawsuit brought in February 2005 and settled in November 2007. On November 5, 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve the consolidated shareholder derivative action for a payment of approximately $0.5 million and for our agreement to adopt certain changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The settlement was approved by the Court on March 28, 2008. Insurance proceeds covered the settlement amount and legal expenses related to the settlement. The settlement dismissed all pending claims against us and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by us or any of the other defendants, and we and the other defendants received a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.

        On September 17, 2003, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Inc., a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees. The lawsuit alleged that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum's MFP-3D AFM constituted willful infringement of five patents owned by us, as well as other claims. We sued for unspecified monetary damages and a permanent injunction to stop infringement. Asylum had asserted that the patents we had sued on were invalid and unenforceable, and had filed a counterclaim for infringement of a patent licensed by Asylum, and payment of royalties it believed it was owed.

        In August of 2008, we settled the patent litigation which we had brought against Asylum. In the settlement, Veeco and Asylum agreed to drop all pending claims against each other and agreed to a five year, worldwide cross license of each company's patents and a mutual covenant not to sue on


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


patents either party has a right to assert. As part of the settlement, Asylum acknowledged the validity of our patents asserted in the case and made payment to us for license fees and will pay an ongoing royalty to us for the five-year term of the cross license. During the case, we capitalized legal costs incurred to defend our patents and are now amortizing these capitalized costs over the remaining lives of these patents. Payments received from Asylum for license fees and royalties have been and will continue to be netted against these capitalized patent defense costs upon receipt. We are not required to make any payments to Asylum under this settlement including any royalties relating to the cross license.

        In accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, we identified five elements to this settlement agreement as follows: (1) the dismissal of the pending litigation by us against Asylum, (2) the dismissal of the pending litigation by Asylum against us, (3) the licensing of certain patents from Asylum, (4) the licensing of certain patents to Asylum and (5) a mutual covenant not to sue. We have allocated all of the consideration and value received from the settlement to element number 4—the licensing of certain patents to Asylum, primarily because Asylum admitted in the settlement agreement that the five Veeco patents included in the infringement suit are valid and enforceable. Accordingly, the consideration received by us pursuant to the settlement relates primarily to the fees and royalties associated with the licenses granted to Asylum.

        We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

        Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of key data storage and HB-LEDour top ten customers, which accounted for 80% and 88% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Of such, HB LED and data storage customers accounted for approximately 38%62% and 9%18%, and 65% and 23%, respectively, of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, key data storage2010 and HB-LED customers accounted for 45% and 11%, respectively, of total accounts receivable.2009.

        As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had two customers whose accounts receivableCustomers who accounted for more than 10% of our aggregate accounts receivable or net sales are as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Seagate Technology, Inc. 

  23% 14%

Western Digital Corporation

  11% 18%

 
 Accounts Receivable
December 31,
 Net Sales
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2010 2009 2010 2009 2008 

Customer A

  20% 43% 17% 27% * 

Customer B

  26% *  *  *  * 

Customer C

  *  *  12% *  * 

Customer D

  *  14% *  10% 21%

*
Less than 10% of aggregate accounts receivable or net sales.

        The Data Storage Process Equipment and MetrologyBoth of our operating segments sell to these major customers. No other customers' accounts receivable represented more than 10% of total accounts receivable in either period.

        Based on net sales, Seagate Technology, Inc. is our largest customer, accounting for 17%, 10%, and 18% of our total net sales in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively (our only customer with sales greater than 10% in any of the past three years).

        We manufacture and sell our products to companies in different geographic locations. In certain instances, we require deposits for a portion of the sales price in advance of shipment. However, the majority of system sales do not require such advance payments. We do, however, perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition and, where appropriate, require that letters of


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


letters of credit be provided on certain foreign sales arrangements. Receivables generally are due within 30-60 days, other than receivables generated from customers in Japan where payment terms generally range from 90-15060-90 days. Our net accounts receivable balance is concentrated in the following geographic locations (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 

Americas

 $21,051 $19,665 

Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA")

  15,341  19,384 

Japan

  8,183  14,865 

Asia Pacific

  15,075  21,192 

Other

  9  101 
      

 $59,659 $75,207 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 

Americas

 $13,600 $15,696 

Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA")

  17,321  10,367 

Asia Pacific(1)

  119,607  41,483 
      

 $150,528 $67,546 
      

(1)
As of December 31, 2010, accounts receivable in China and Singapore amounted to $66.5 million and $48.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, accounts receivable in Singapore amounted to $34.0 million. No other country accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable as of December 31 for the years presented.

Suppliers

        We currently outsource, and plan to increasecontinue the outsourcing of, certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, and certain data storage process equipment systems. At present, wesystems, solar deposition systems and ion sources. We primarily rely primarily on twoseveral suppliers for the majoritymanufacturing of the manufacture of these MOCVD and data storage process equipment systems. We plan to maintain internal manufacturing capability for these systems at least until such time as we have qualified one or more alternate suppliers to perform this manufacturing. The failure of our present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under our supply arrangementarrangements and our inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and relationships with our customers.

        In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010

9.11. Foreign Operations, Geographic Area, and Product Segment Information

        Net sales which are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer facility is located and long-lived assets related to operations in the United States and other foreign countries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 20062008 are as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 Net Sales to
Unaffiliated Customers
 Long-Lived Assets 
 
 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 

United States

 $163,754 $127,884 $145,464 $161,217 $225,395 $242,056 

Other

  2,172  2,616  6,222       
              
 

Total Americas

  165,926  130,500  151,686  161,217  225,395  242,056 

EMEA(1)

  
94,142
  
77,985
  
69,310
  
427
  
603
  
613
 

Japan

  38,453  55,815  57,241  308  250  193 

Asia Pacific(1)

  144,288  138,175  162,797  398  439  451 
              
 

Total Other Foreign Countries

  276,883  271,975  289,348  1,133  1,292  1,257 
              

 $442,809 $402,475 $441,034 $162,350 $226,687 $243,313 
              

 
 Net Sales to Unaffiliated Customers Long-Lived Assets 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 

United States

 $94,753 $60,553 $130,088 $123,543 $117,350 $124,480 

Other

  232  177  485       
              
 

Total Americas

  94,985  60,730  130,573  123,543  117,350  124,480 

EMEA(1)

  
92,112
  
50,088
  
57,567
  
274
  
315
  
413
 

Asia Pacific(1)

  746,134  171,594  126,795  974  815  706 
              
 

Total Other Foreign Countries

  838,246  221,682  184,362  1,248  1,130  1,119 
              

 $933,231 $282,412 $314,935 $124,791 $118,480 $125,599 
              

(1)
For the year ended December 31, 2010, net sales to customers in South Korea, China and Taiwan were 32.3%, 28.6% and 10.8% of total net sales, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2009, net sales to customers in South Korea and China were 35.1% and 11.0% of total net sales, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, net sales to customers in Germany and Taiwan were 10.1%10.3% and 12.4% of total net sales, and for the year ended December 31, 2006, net sales to customers in Malaysia were 10.1% of total net sales.respectively. No other country in EMEA and Asia Pacific accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the periodsyears presented.

        In 2008, we began toWe manage the business, review operating results and assess performance, as well as allocate resources, based upon threetwo separate reporting segments to more accuratelythat reflect the market focus of each business. The LEDLight Emitting Diode ("LED") & Solar Process Equipment segment consists of the MOCVDmetal organic chemical vapor deposition ("MOCVD") systems, molecular beam epitaxy ("MBE") systems, thermal deposition sources, and MBE productsother types of deposition systems used to deposit materials on flexible and web coatersglass substrates. These systems are primarily sold to customers in the HB-LED,high-brightness light emitting diode ("HB LED") and solar and wireless industries.industries, as well as to scientific research customers. This segment has production facilitiesproduct development and marketing sites in Somerset, New Jersey, St. Paul, Minnesota, Lowell, Massachusetts and Lowell, Massachusetts.Clifton Park, New York. The Data Storage Process Equipment segment consists of the IBE, IBD,ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing products sold primarily to customers in the data storage industry. This segment has production facilitiesproduct development and marketing sites in Plainview, New York, Ft. Collins, Colorado and Camarillo, California. The Metrology segment consists of products that are used to provide critical surface measurements on items such as semiconductor devices and TFMHs, as well as biological, nanoscience, and material science samples, and includes our broad line of atomic force microscopes, optical interferometers and stylus profilers sold to customers in the semiconductor and data storage industries and thousands of research facilities and scientific centers. This segment has production facilities in Camarillo and Santa Barbara, California and Tucson, Arizona.

        Prior to 2008, we managed the business based on two segments, Process Equipment and Metrology. The Process Equipment segment combined the ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing products with the MOCVD and MBE technologies. The Metrology segment remained unchanged. The prior years' segment financial information presented below has been conformed to the current-period presentation.

        We evaluate the performance of our reportable segments based on income (loss) from operations before interest, income taxes, amortization and certain items ("Segmentsegment profit (loss)"), which is the


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008


primary indicator used to plan and forecast future periods. The presentation of this financial measure facilitates meaningful comparison with prior periods, as management believes segment profit (loss) reports baseline performance and thus provides useful information. Certain items include restructuring expenses, asset impairment charges, inventory write-offs, equity-based compensation expense and inventory write-offs. Beginning in 2009, certain items will also include equity compensation. We believe this new measure excluding equity compensation will more accurately reflect the way we manage the Company's performance going forward.other non-recurring items. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of critical accounting policies.


Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2010

        The following tables present certain data pertaining to our reportable product segments and a reconciliation of segment profit (loss) to income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes and noncontrolling interest for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2006,2008, and goodwill and total assets as of December 31, 20082010 and 2007 (in thousands)2009 (in thousands):

 
 LED & Solar
Process
Equipment
 Data Storage
Process
Equipment
 Metrology Unallocated
Corporate
Amount
 Total 

Year ended December 31, 2008

                

Net sales

 $165,812 $149,123 $127,874 $ $442,809 
            

Segment profit (loss)

 $26,467 $19,877 $(3,495)$(14,386)$28,463 

Interest expense, net

        3,812  3,812 

Amortization expense

  4,627  3,790  1,880  448  10,745 

Restructuring expense

  732  396  1,138  8,296  10,562 

Asset impairment charges

    51,102  21,935  285  73,322 

Inventory write-offs

      2,900    2,900 

Purchase accounting adjustment

  1,492        1,492 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

        (4,969) (4,969)
            

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $19,616 $(35,411)$(31,348)$(22,258)$(69,401)
            

Year ended December 31, 2007

                

Net sales

 $115,863 $136,169 $150,443 $ $402,475 
            

Segment profit (loss)

 $13,991 $5,861 $2,441 $(11,489)$10,804 

Interest expense, net

        3,013  3,013 

Amortization expense

  4,263  3,806  1,486  695  10,250 

Restructuring expense

  34  2,498  1,952  2,242  6,726 

Asset impairment charges

    1,068      1,068 

Inventory write-offs

    4,821      4,821 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

        (738) (738)
            

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $9,694 $(6,332)$(997)$(16,701)$(14,336)
            

 
 LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
Corporate
 Total 

Year ended December 31, 2010

             

Net sales

 $797,904 $135,327 $ $933,231 
          

Segment profit (loss)

 $276,060 $34,534 $(18,674)$291,920 

Interest expense, net

      6,572  6,572 

Amortization expense

  3,121  1,522  233  4,876 

Equity-based compensation expense

  2,643  1,140  5,865  9,648 

Restructuring credit

    (179)   (179)
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes

 $270,296 $32,051 $(31,344)$271,003 
          

Year ended December 31, 2009

             

Net sales

 $205,153 $77,259 $ $282,412 
          

Segment profit (loss)

 $27,826 $(2,578)$(10,598)$14,650 

Interest expense, net

      6,850  6,850 

Amortization expense

  3,137  1,599  432  5,168 

Equity-based compensation expense

  1,358  1,020  5,169  7,547 

Restructuring expense

  1,196  3,006  635  4,837 

Asset impairment charge

    304    304 

Inventory write-offs

    1,526    1,526 
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes

 $22,135 $(10,033)$(23,684)$(11,582)
          

Year ended December 31, 2008

             

Net sales

 $165,812 $149,123 $ $314,935 
          

Segment profit (loss)

 $23,913 $16,986 $(9,221)$31,678 

Interest expense, net

      6,729  6,729 

Amortization expense

  4,627  3,790  448  8,865 

Equity-based compensation expense

  495  990  5,165  6,650 

Restructuring expense

  732  396  8,296  9,424 

Asset impairment charges

    51,102  285  51,387 

Purchase accounting adjustment

  1,492      1,492 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

      (3,758) (3,758)
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes

 $16,567 $(39,292)$(26,386)$(49,111)
          

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 20082010


 
 LED & Solar
Process
Equipment
 Data Storage
Process
Equipment
 Metrology Unallocated
Corporate
Amount
 Total 

Year ended December 31, 2006

                

Net sales

 $94,165 $174,713 $172,156 $ $441,034 
            

Segment profit (loss)

 $2,001 $26,443 $23,281 $(12,064)$39,661 

Interest expense, net

        4,268  4,268 

Amortization expense

  9,434  3,746  1,815  1,050  16,045 

Write-off of purchased in-process technology

    1,160      1,160 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

        (330) (330)
            

(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $(7,433)$21,537 $21,466 $(17,052)$18,518 
            

 
 LED & Solar Data Storage Unallocated
Corporate
 Total 

As of December 31, 2010

             

Goodwill

 $52,003 $ $ $52,003 

Total assets

 $323,096 $61,691 $763,247 $1,148,034 

As of December 31, 2009

             

Goodwill

 $52,003 $ $ $52,003 

Total assets

 $178,420 $54,106 $372,846 $605,372 

        Corporate total assets are comprised principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

        

 
 LED & Solar
Process
Equipment
 Data Storage
Process
Equipment
 Metrology Unallocated
Corporate
Amount
 Total 

As of December 31, 2008

                

Goodwill

 $51,727 $ $7,433 $ $59,160 

Total assets

 $137,037 $84,335 $85,390 $122,779 $429,541 

As of December 31, 2007

                

Goodwill

 $41,153 $30,377 $29,368 $ $100,898 

Total assets

 $121,326 $144,944 $121,060 $142,004 $529,334 

Other Segment Data (in thousands)(in thousands):

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Depreciation and amortization expense:

          
 

LED & Solar Process Equipment

 $7,850 $6,903 $12,000 
 

Data Storage Process Equipment

  7,690  9,063  9,935 
 

Metrology

  7,393  6,618  5,597 
 

Unallocated Corporate

  2,156  2,407  2,548 
        
 

Total depreciation and amortization expense

 $25,089 $24,991 $30,080 
        

Expenditures for long-lived assets:

          
 

LED & Solar Process Equipment

 $5,605 $2,620 $3,554 
 

Data Storage Process Equipment

  4,256  2,844  4,542 
 

Metrology

  1,728  1,682  7,146 
 

Unallocated Corporate

  1,217  1,946  2,159 
        
 

Total expenditures for long-lived assets

 $12,806 $9,092 $17,401 
        


 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Depreciation and amortization expense:

          
 

LED & Solar

 $7,573 $7,392 $7,850 
 

Data Storage

  3,582  4,448  7,690 
 

Unallocated Corporate

  1,699  2,025  2,145 
        
 

Total depreciation and amortization expense

 $12,854 $13,865 $17,685 
        

Expenditures for long-lived assets:

          
 

LED & Solar

 $8,086 $6,656 $5,605 
 

Data Storage

  572  192  4,256 
 

Unallocated Corporate

  2,066  612  1,265 
        
 

Total expenditures for long-lived assets

 $10,724 $7,460 $11,126 
        

Table of Contents


Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

December 31, 2008

10.12. Defined Contribution Benefit Plan

        We maintain a defined contribution benefit plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Almost all of our domestic full-time employees are eligible to participate in this plan. Under the plan, we provide matching contributions of fifty cents for every dollar employees contribute up to a maximum of the lesser of 6% of an employee's eligible compensation or $2,500. The plan also allows the Board of Directors to determine annual discretionary profit sharing contributions at each plan year-end.$3,000. Generally, the plan calls for vesting of Company contributions over the initial five years of a participant's employment. Beginning in 2007, we maintained a similar type of contribution plan at one of our foreign subsidiaries.

Our contributions to these plans in 2010, 2009 and 2008 2007, and 2006 were $1.7$1.8 million, $1.7$1.0 million and $1.8$1.4 million, respectively.

13. Cost Method Investment

        On September 28, 2010, Veeco completed an investment in a rapidly developing organic light emitting diode (OLED) equipment company. Veeco has invested in this company's Round B funding extension totaling $3 million, resulting in 7.8% ownership of the preferred shares, and 5.6% ownership of the company. Since we do not exhibit significant influence on such company, this investment is treated under the cost method in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. The fair value of this investment is not estimated because there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment, and we are exempt from estimating interim fair values because the investment does not meet the definition of a publicly traded company. This investment is recorded in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010.


Table of Contents


Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (in(in thousands)

COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E 
 
  
 Additions  
  
 
Description Balance at
Beginning of
Period
 Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 Charged to
Other
Accounts
 Deductions Balance at
End of
Period
 

Deducted from asset accounts:

                
 

Year ended December 31, 2008:

                
  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $984 $(49)$ $2 $937 
  

Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

  73,292  12,457  317  (3,121) 82,945 
            

 $74,276 $12,408 $317 $(3,119)$83,882 
            

Deducted from asset accounts:

                
 

Year ended December 31, 2007:

                
  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $2,683 $(1,070)$ $(629)$984 
  

Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

  67,770  11,414    (5,892) 73,292 
            

 $70,453 $10,344 $ $(6,521)$74,276 
            

Deducted from asset accounts:

                
 

Year ended December 31, 2006:

                
  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $1,860 $322 $527 $(26)$2,683 
  

Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

  69,982  (2,212)     67,770 
            

 $71,842 $(1,890)$527 $(26)$70,453 
            

COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E 
 
  
 Additions  
  
 
Description Balance at
Beginning of
Period
 Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 Charged to
Other
Accounts
 Deductions Balance at
End of
Period
 

Deducted from asset accounts:

                
 

Year ended December 31, 2010:

                
  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $438 $40 $34 $ $512 
  

Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

  84,723    (2,663) (80,416) 1,644 
            

 $85,161 $40 $(2,629)$(80,416)$2,156 
            

Deducted from asset accounts:

                
 

Year ended December 31, 2009:

                
  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $583 $(52)$ $(93)$438 
  

Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

  78,706  6,017      84,723 
            

 $79,289 $5,965 $ $(93)$85,161 
            

Deducted from asset accounts:

                
 

Year ended December 31, 2008:

                
  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $641 $(67)$9 $ $583 
  

Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

  67,360  14,150  317  (3,121) 78,706 
            

 $68,001 $14,083 $326 $(3,121)$79,289 
            


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

        Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number
 Exhibit Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
2.1Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 15, 2010 among Veeco Instruments Inc. (Veeco), Veeco Metrology Inc. and Bruker CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Exhibit 2.1
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the CompanyVeeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 3.1
3.2 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 3.2
3.3 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.1
3.4 Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, Exhibit 3.1
3.5Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Exhibit 3.1
3.6Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010Filed herewith
3.7 Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company,Veeco, effective October 23, 2008 Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1
3.8Amendment No. 1 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective May 20, 2010Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2010, Exhibit 3.1
4.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Rights Agent, including the form of the Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights setting forth the terms of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Exhibit A, the form of Rights Certificates as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C. Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated March 15, 2001, Exhibit 1
4.2 Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2001, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 21, 2001, Exhibit 4.1
4.3 Amendment No 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2002, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as rights agent. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002, Exhibit 4.1

NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
4.4 Indenture, dated April 16, 2007, between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank National Trust Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 To Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128004) filed April 16, 2007, Exhibit 4.1
4.5 First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 20, 2007, by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 20, 2007, Exhibit 4.1
10.1Credit Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2007, by and among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1

Number
ExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.2First Amendment dated as of February 25, 2008 to the Credit Agreement dated August 20, 2007 among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.2
10.3Amendment and Reaffirmation dated August 20, 2007 of Security Agreement dated as of March 15, 2005 among Veeco Instruments Inc., the subsidiaries of Veeco named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.2
10.4 Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.2
10.510.2 Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002). Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.2
10.610.3 Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.3
10.710.4*Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco and each of its directors and executive officers.Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
10.5*Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-93958), Exhibit 10.20
10.810.6*Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.1
10.910.7*Amendment dated July 25, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.2
10.1010.8*Amendment dated May 29, 1998 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.1
10.1110.9*Amendment dated May 14, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees' Stock Option Plan. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.2
10.1210.10*Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-85184), Exhibit 10.17
10.13*Amendment dated May 15, 1996 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08981) filed July 26, 1996, Exhibit 10.2
10.14*Amendment dated May 15, 1997 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35009) filed September 5, 1997, Exhibit 10.3
10.15*Amendment dated May 21, 1999 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors.Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79469) filed May 27, 1999, Exhibit 10.3

Number
ExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.16*Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.4
10.1710.11*Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1
10.1810.12*Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.41
10.13*Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3

10.19*Form of Directors Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant
NumberExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 2006Following Documents
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
10.2010.14*Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3
10.2110.15*Veeco Instruments Inc. 20002010 Stock OptionIncentive Plan, for Non-Officer Employees.effective May 14, 2010 Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-49476)333-166852) filed November 7, 2000,May 14, 2010, Exhibit 4.410.1
10.2210.16*Amendment No. 1 to the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees, effective dated July 26, 2001.Agreement Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-66574)333-166852) filed August 2, 2001,May 14, 2010, Exhibit 4.210.2
10.2310.17*Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock AgreementRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 333-166852) filed May 14, 2010, Exhibit 10.3
10.18*Veeco Instruments Inc. 2006 Long-Term Cash Incentive PlanPerformance-Based Restricted Stock 2010 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,2010, Exhibit 10.110.2
10.2410.19*Employment agreement effective as of July 1, 2007 between John R. Peeler and Veeco Instruments Inc.2010 Management Bonus Plan dated January 22, 2010 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007,March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.310.2
10.2510.20*Employment AgreementVeeco 2010 Special Profit Sharing Plan dated as of April 1, 2003 between John F. Rein, Jr. and Veeco Instruments Inc.February 15, 2010 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, Exhibit 10.5
10.26*Amendment to Employment Agreement of John F. Rein, Jr., effective June 9, 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
10.27*Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between the Company and John P. Kiernan.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38
10.28*Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Robert P. OatesQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.1
10.29*Form of Amendment to Letter Agreements of John P. Kiernan and Robert P. Oates effective June 9, 2006Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,2010, Exhibit 10.3
10.30*Letter Agreement dated October 15, 2007 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and William A. TomeoAnnual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.32

Number
ExhibitIncorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
10.31*Letter Agreement dated January 11, 2008 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and Mark R. MunchAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.33
10.32*Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco Instruments Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1
10.33*Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of September 12, 2008 between John F. Rein, Jr. and Veeco Instruments Inc.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1
10.34*Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of September 12, 2008 between Robert P. Oates and Veeco Instruments Inc.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.2
10.3510.21*Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3
10.3610.22*Amendment No. 1 dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Senior Executive Change in Control PolicyAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.37
10.23*Service Agreement effective July 24, 2008 between Veeco and Edward H. Braun and Veeco Instruments Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1
10.3710.24*Amendment No.Employment Agreement effective as of July 1, dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to2007 between Veeco Instruments Inc. Senior Executive Change in Control Policyand John R. Peeler Filed herewithQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.3
10.3810.25*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco Instruments Inc. and John R. Peeler Filed herewithAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.38
10.3910.26*Second Amendment effective December 31, 2008June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco Instruments Inc. and John F. Rein, Jr.R. Peeler Filed herewithQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1
10.4010.27*Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2009 (effective January 18, 2010) between Veeco and David D. GlassQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.1
10.28*Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38
10.29*Form of Amendment effective December 31, 2008June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreements between Veeco Instruments Inc. and each of John P. Kiernan Mark R. Munch and Robert P. Oates Filed herewith
10.41*Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.Filed herewith
10.42Second Amendment dated as of February 27, 2009 (effective December 31, 2008) toQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Credit Agreement dated August 20, 2007 among Veeco Instruments Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.Filed herewith
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.Filed herewith
23.1Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.Filed herewith
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.Filed herewithquarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

Number
 Exhibit Incorporated by Reference to the Following Documents
31.210.30*Form of Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreements between Veeco and each of John P. Kiernan, Mark R. Munch and Robert P. OatesAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.40
10.31*Letter agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. KiernanQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Exhibit 10.2
10.32*Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco and Robert P. OatesQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, Exhibit 10.1
10.33*Amendment dated September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and Robert P. OatesQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.2
10.34*Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2003 between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, Exhibit 10.5
10.35*Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.2
10.36*Amendment dated as of September 12, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1
10.37*Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John F. Rein, Jr.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.39
10.38*Letter Agreement dated January 11, 2008 between Veeco and Mark R. MunchAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Exhibit 10.33
10.39*Letter Agreement dated September 23, 2010 between Veeco and Mark R. MunchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.Filed herewith
23.1Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.Filed herewith
31.1 Certification of Chief FinancialExecutive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a)13a-14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.Filed herewith
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith

*
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a) (3) of Form 10-K.



QuickLinks

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
PART II
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 2003 ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31
PART III
PART IV
SIGNATURES
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in thousands)
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations (In thousands, except per share data)
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Dollars in thousands)
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands)
Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2008
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (in thousands)
INDEX TO EXHIBITS