Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


ý


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011

OR

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period fromto

ýCommission File No. 1-32525 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                   TO                   

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-32525

AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware13-3180631


(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation incorporation or organization)
 13-3180631

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)



1099 Ameriprise Financial Center,
Minneapolis, Minnesota


55474
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


 

55474

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(612) 671-3131

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Registrant's telephone number, including area code(612) 671-3131



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each className ofon each exchange on which registered
Common Stock par(par value $.01 per shareshare) The New York Stock Exchange, Inc.


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.


None.Yes ý


No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.Yes oNo ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes ýNo o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes ýNo o
Yesý    Noo

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yeso    Noý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesý    Noo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer,""accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerýAccelerated fileroNon-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyo
    (Doý


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated FilerýAccelerated Filero
Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)o
 Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso    Noý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes oNo ý

The aggregate market value, as of June 30, 2008,2011, of voting shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $8.8$13.7 billion.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer'sregistrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class Outstanding at February 13, 200910, 2012
Common Stock par(par value $.01 per shareshare) 218,821,776221,898,756 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III: Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 22, 200925, 2012 ("Proxy Statement").



AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
FORMForm 10-K
INDEX

Index



Page No.
PARTPart I.    



Item 1.

 

Business

 

1



Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 
22
23



Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 
34
37



Item 2.

 

Properties

 
34
38



Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 
35
38



Item 4.

 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Mine Safety Disclosures

 
36
39

PARTPart II.



 

 

 

 



Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 
37
40



Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 
39
41



Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 
41
42



Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 
76
92



Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 
81
97



Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 
142
166



Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 
142
166



Item 9B.

 

Other Information

 
144
167

PARTPart III.



 

 

 

 



Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 
144
167



Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 
147
169



Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 
147
169



Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 
147
170



Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 
147
170

PARTPart IV.



 

 

 

 



Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 
147
170



Signatures

 
148
171



Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

 
F-2
F-3



Exhibit Index

 

E-1

Table of Contents


PARTPart I.

Item 1. Business.

Overview

Ameriprise Financial, Inc. is a holding company incorporated in Delaware primarily engaged in business through its subsidiaries. Accordingly, references below to "Ameriprise," "Ameriprise Financial," the "Company," "we," "us""us," and "our" may refer to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. exclusively, to our entire family of companies, or to one or more of our subsidiaries. Our headquarters is located at 55 Ameriprise Financial Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474. We also maintain executive offices in New York City.

We are engageda diversified financial services company with $631 billion in providing financial planning, productsassets under management and services that are designed to be utilizedadministration as solutions for our clients' cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection, and estate and wealth transfer needs. As of December 31, 2008, we had a network of more than 12,4002011. We serve individual investors' and institutions' financial advisors and registered representatives ("affiliated financial advisors"). In addition to serving clients through our affiliated financial advisors, our asset management, annuity, and auto and home protection products are distributed through third-party advisors and affinity relationships.

We believe we are well positioned to further strengthen our offerings to existing and new clients and deliver profitable long-term growth to our shareholders. Our five strategic objectives are:

Be the leading provider of financial planning products and services to mass affluent and affluent clients.

Strengthen our lead in financial planning.

Become the platform of choice for financial planning-focused advisors.

Capture greater assets and protection in force by improving and expanding our product solutions and extending our distribution reach.

Ensure increasingly stronger and more efficient enterprise-wide capabilities.

We deliver solutions to our clients through an approach focused on building long term personal relationships between our advisors and clients. We offer financial planning and advice that are responsive to our clients' evolving needs, and help them achieve their identified financial goals by recommending actions and a range of product "solutions" consisting of investment, annuities, insurance, banking and other financial products that help them attain over time a return or form of protection while accepting what they determine to be an appropriate range and level of risk. The financial product solutions we offer through our affiliated advisors include both our own products and services and products of other companies. Our financial planning and advisory process is designed to provide comprehensive advice, when appropriate, to address our clients' cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection, and estate and wealth transfer needs. We believe that our focus on personal relationships, together with our strengthshold leadership positions in financial planning, wealth management, retirement, asset management, annuities and product development, allows us to better address our clients'insurance, and we maintain a strong operating and financial needs, including the financial needs of our primary target market segment, the mass affluent and affluent, which we define as households with investable assets of more than $100,000. This focus also puts usfoundation.

Ameriprise is in a strong position to capitalize on significant demographic and market trends, which we believe will continue to drive increased demand for our financial planning and other financial services. DeepOur emphasis on deep client-advisor relationships arehas been central to the abilitysuccess of our business model, to succeedincluding through market cycles, including the extreme market conditions that persisted through 2008.of the past few years, and we believe it will help us navigate future market and economic cycles. We continue to establish Ameriprise Financialstrengthen our position as a retail financial services leader as we focus on meeting the financial needs of the mass affluent and affluent, as evidenced by our continued leadership in financial planning, and a client retention percentage rate of 94%. Branded92%, and our status as a top ten ranked firm within core portions of our four main business segments, including the size of our U.S. advisor force, and assets in long-term U.S. mutual funds, variable annuities and variable universal life insurance.

We go to market in two primary ways:

Wealth Management and Retirement; and

Asset Management.

With respect to our wealth management and retirement capabilities, we offer financial plan netplanning, products and services designed to be used as solutions for our clients' cash salesand liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection, and estate and wealth transfer needs. Our model for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased 4% compared to the year-ago period.

Our multi-platform network of affiliateddelivering product solutions is built on long-term, personal relationships between our clients and our financial advisors isand registered representatives ("affiliated advisors"). Our focus on personal relationships, together with our discipline in financial planning and strengths in product development and advice, allow us to address the means byevolving financial and retirement-related needs of our clients, including our primary target market segment, the mass affluent and affluent, which we develop personal relationshipsdefine as households with retail clients. We refer to the affiliated financial advisors who use our brand name (who numberedinvestable assets of more than 10,500 at December 31, 2008) as$100,000. The financial product solutions we offer through our brandedaffiliated advisors include both our own products and those who do not use our brand name but who areservices and the products of other companies. Our affiliated as registered representatives of ours as our unbranded advisors (who numbered over 1,900 at December 31, 2008). Our branded advisor network is also the primary distribution channel through which we offer our investmentlife insurance and annuity products and services, as well as a range of banking and protection products.

Our affiliated advisors are focused on using a financial planning and advisory process designed to provide comprehensive advice that focuses on all aspects of our clients' finances. This approach allows us to recommend actions and a broad range of product solutions, including investment, annuity, insurance, banking and other financial products that can help clients attain a return or form of protection over time while accepting what they determine to be an appropriate range and level of risk. We believe our focus on meeting clients' needs through personal financial planning results in more satisfied clients with deeper, longer lasting relationships with our company and higher retention of our affiliated advisors.

As of December 31, 2011, we had a network of more than 9,700 affiliated advisors. We offer our brandedaffiliated advisors training, tools, leadership, marketing programs and other field and centralized support to assist them in delivering advice and product solutions to clients. We believe our comprehensive and client-focused approach not only improves the products and services we provide to their clients, but also allows us to reinvest in enhanced services for clients and increase support for our affiliated financial advisors. This integrated model also affords us

With respect to asset management, we have an increasingly global presence. We have two asset management platforms: Columbia Management in the U.S. and Threadneedle overseas. We serve individual, institutional and high-net worth investors. We offer a better understandingbroad spectrum of equity, fixed income and alternative products that we primarily distribute through third-parties as well as through our clients, which allows usown affiliated advisor channel. We are expanding beyond our traditional strengths in the U.S. and U.K. to better managegather assets in Continental Europe, Asia, Australia and the risk profile of our businesses.Middle East. We believe we are well positioned to continue to strengthen our focus on meeting clients' needs through personal financial planning results in more satisfiedofferings to existing and new clients with deeper, longer lasting relationships withand deliver profitable long-term growth to our company and a higher retention of experienced financial advisors.shareholders.

Our five operating segments are:

Advice & Wealth Management;

Table of Contents

The financial results from the businesses underlying our go to market approach are reflected in our five operating segments:

Advice & Wealth Management;

Asset Management;

Annuities;

Protection; and

Corporate & Other.

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planningFinancial markets and advice, as well as full service brokerage and banking services, primarily to retail clients, through our affiliated financial advisors. Our affiliated advisors utilize a diversified selection of both proprietary and non-proprietary products to help clients meet their financial needs.

Our Asset Management segment provides investment advice and investment products to retail and institutional clients. Our subsidiary, RiverSource Investments, LLC, ("RiverSource Investments") predominantly provides U.S. domestic products and services and our subsidiary, Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings Sàrl ("Threadneedle"), and its affiliates predominantly provide international investment products and services. U.S. domestic retail products are primarily distributed through our Advice & Wealth Management segment, and also through unaffiliated advisors. International retail products are primarily distributed through third parties. Institutional clients are served directly by RiverSource Investments and Threadneedle personnel.

Our Annuities segment provides RiverSource Life variable and fixed annuity products to retail clients, primarily distributed through our affiliated financial advisors and to the retail clients of unaffiliated advisors and firms through third-party distributors.

Our Protection segment provides a variety of protection products to address the protection and risk management needs of our retail clients, including life, disability income and property-casualty insurance primarily distributed through our affiliated financial advisors. This segment also includes our long term care block which was closed in 2002.

Our Corporate & Other segment realizes net investment income on corporate level assets, including excess capital held in RiverSource Life and other unallocated equity and revenues from various investments, as well as unallocated corporate expenses. This segment also includes non-recurring costs from 2007 and 2006 associated with our separation from American Express Company ("American Express"), which ended in the fourth quarter of 2007.

During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the global financial markets in which each of our segments operate experienced unprecedented volatility and decline. Marketmacroeconomic conditions have had and will continue to have a significant impact on the operating results of each of our segments. WeIn 2011, persistent economic headwinds and geo-political crises increased volatility and weighed on the performance of financial markets. The S&P 500 Index ended the year virtually unchanged, while many international equity markets experienced sharp declines and interest rates remained exceptionally low. In addition to struggles in the economy and financial markets, the business and regulatory environment in which we operate remains subject to uncertainty and change, and we expect that athis challenging business climate will persist for the foreseeable future.to continue. To succeed, in this environment, we expect to continue focusing on each of our key strategic objectives. The success of these and other strategies may be affected by the factors discussed below in Item 1A Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K — "Risk Factors", and other factors as discussed herein.

In 2008,2011, we generated $7.0$10.2 billion in total net revenues, $371 million pretax lossrevenues. Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ameriprise Financial for 2011 was $1.1 billion. Return on equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), was 11.5 percent.

As a diversified financial services firm, we believe our ability to gather assets across the enterprise is best measured by our assets under management and $38 million net loss.administration metric. At December 31, 2008,2011, we had $372.1$631.3 billion in owned, managedassets under management and administered assetsadministration worldwide compared to $479.8$647.5 billion as of December 31, 2007,2010, as follows:

 
 As of December 31, 
Asset Category 2008 2007 
 
 (in billions)
 
Owned $31.7 $39.6 
Managed  264.9  369.2 
Administered  75.5  71.0 
      
 Total $372.1 $479.8 
      

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Managed

 $527.6 $541.9 

Administered

  103.7  105.6 
  

Total

 $631.3 $647.5 
  

For a more detailed discussion of assets under management and administration see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Principal Brands

We use twothree principal brands for our businesses: businesses in the United States:Ameriprise Financial,Columbia Management andRiverSource.

We use ourThreadneedle brand for our international asset manager's products. We believe that using distinct brands for the products and services of our various businesses allows us to differentiate them in the marketplace.

We useAmeriprise Financial as our holding company brand, as well as the name of our brandedaffiliated advisor network and certain of our retail products and services. The retail products and services that utilizeuse theAmeriprise Financial® brand include products and servicesthose that we provide through our brandedaffiliated advisors (e.g., financial planning, investment advisory accounts, retail brokerage services and banking products) and products and services that we market directly to consumers (e.g., personal auto and home insurance).

We useColumbia Management as the primary brand for our U.S. asset management products and services. Following the completion of the acquisition of the long-term asset management business of the Columbia Management Group from Bank of America in April 2010, we combined RiverSource Investments, our legacy U.S. asset management business, with Columbia Management, under theColumbia Management® brand. Our U.S. asset management products, including retail and institutional asset management products, primarily use theColumbia Management name.

We use ourRiverSource® brand for our U.S. asset management, annuity,annuities products and for the majority ofprotection products issued by the RiverSource Life companies, including our protection products. Products that utilize theRiverSource name include retail and institutional asset management products, retail mutual funds, annuities and life and disability income insurance products. We believe that using a distinct brand for these products permits differentiation from our branded advisor network.


Table of Contents

History and Development

Our company has a more than 110 years'117 year history of providing financial solutions designed to help clients achieve their financial objectives. Our earliest predecessor company, Investors Syndicate, was founded in 1894 to provide face-amount certificates to consumers with a need for conservative investments. By 1937, Investors Syndicate had expanded its


Table of Contents

product offerings through Federal Housing Authority mortgages, and later, mutual funds, by establishing Investors Mutual, one of the pioneers in the mutual fund industry. In 1949, Investors Syndicate was renamed Investors Diversified Services, Inc., or IDS. In 1957, IDS added life insurance products, and later, annuity products, through IDS Life Insurance Company (now known as "RiverSource Life Insurance Company"). In 1972, IDS began to expand its distribution network by delivering investment products directly to clients of unaffiliated financial institutions. IDS also introduced its comprehensive financial planning processes to clients, integrating the identification of client needs with the products and services to address those needs in the 1970s, and it introduced fee-based planning in the 1980s.

In 1979, IDS became a wholly owned subsidiary of Alleghany Corporation pursuant to a merger. In 1983, our company was formed as a Delaware corporation in connection with American Express' 1984 acquisition of IDS Financial Services from Alleghany Corporation. We changed our name to "American Express Financial Corporation" ("AEFC") and began sellingmarketing our products and services under the American Express brand in 1994. To provide retail clients with a more comprehensive set of products and services, in the late 1990s we began significantly expandingexpanded our offering of the mutual funds of other companies.companies in the late 1990s. In 2003, we acquired Threadneedle. the business of Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings.

On September 30, 2005, American Express consummated a distribution of the shares of AEFC to American Express shareholders, (the "Distribution"), at which time we became an independent, publicly traded company and changed our name to "Ameriprise Financial, Inc." In 2006, we divested our defined contribution recordkeeping business. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we completed the acquisitions of H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc., Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. and J. & W. Seligman & Co., Incorporated each of("Seligman"), which further expanded our retail distribution oradvisor network and our asset management capabilities. Also in 2008, we initiated the disposition of our institutional trust and custody business and completed that restructuring in early 2009. In 2010, we completed the acquisition of the long-term asset management business of Columbia Management from Bank of America. This acquisition, the integration of which is expected to be completed in 2012, has enhanced the scale and performance of our retail mutual fund and institutional asset management businesses.

In 2011, we completed the sale of Securities America Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries ("Securities America") to Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services, Inc. Securities America had provided a platform for the affiliation of independent advisors and registered representatives to conduct business without utilizing theAmeriprise® brand. The sale allows us to focus our efforts on servicing and developing our branded advisor network.

Our Organization

The following is a simplified depiction of the organizational structure for our company, showing the primary subsidiaries through which we operate our businesses. The current legal entity names are provided for each subsidiary.


Table of Contents

Following is a brief description of the business conducted by each subsidiary noted above, as well as the segment or segments in which it primarily operates.


Table of Contents

Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings Sàrl is a Luxembourg-based holding company for the Threadneedle group of companies ("Threadneedle"), which provides investment management products and services to clients in the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region on a basis primarily independent from our other affiliates. Operating under its own brand name, management organization and operating, compliance and technology infrastructure, Threadneedle's results of operations are included in our Asset Management segment.

RiverSource Investments,Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("CMIA") serves as investment advisor to our RiverSource® and Seligmanadviser for the majority of funds in theColumbia Management family of mutual funds ("Columbia Management funds") and to institutional accounts. Its results of operations are included in our Asset Management and Corporate & Other segments.

J. & W. Seligman & Co., Incorporated is a holding company for the Seligman group of companies ("Seligman"), which we acquired in November 2008.Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. and certain other subsidiaries within our Asset Management segment. Seligman's results of operations are included in our Asset Management segment.

RiverSource FundColumbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. is a broker-dealer subsidiary which began servingthat serves as the principal underwriter and distributor for ourRiverSourceColumbia Management andSeligman mutual funds on January 2, 2009.funds. Its results of operations are included in our Asset Management segment.



Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.

is a transfer agent that processes client transactions forColumbia Management funds and Ameriprise face-amount certificates. Its results of operations are included in our Asset Management and Advice & Wealth Management segments.

AMPF Holding Corporation is a holding company for certain of our retail brokerage and advisory subsidiaries, including AFSI (defined below) and AEIS (defined below). AMPF Holding Corporation's results of operations are included in our Advice & Wealth Management segment.

American Enterprise Investment Services Inc. ("AEIS") is our registered clearing broker-dealer subsidiary. Brokerage transactions for accounts introduced by Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.AFSI are executed, cleared and clearedsettled through AEIS. Its results of operations are included in our Advice & Wealth Management segment.

Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. ("AFSI"), a registered broker-dealer and registered investment adviser, is our primary financial planning and retail distribution subsidiary, which operates under our Ameriprise Financial brand name.subsidiary. Its results of operations are included in our Advice & Wealth Management segment.

Securities America Financial Corporation  is a holding company for Securities America, Inc. ("SAI"), our retail distribution subsidiary, which provides a platform for our unbranded advisors. Operating under its own name, management organization and operating, compliance and technology infrastructure, its results of operations are included in our Advice & Wealth Management segment. Securities America Financial Corporation purchased Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. ("Brecek & Young") in October 2008.

AMPF Holding Corporation  is a holding company for the group of companies comprising the retail brokerage and advisory business which we acquired from H&R Block, Inc. in October 2008, and subsequently renamed. The primary operating subsidiary within the AMPF Holding Corporation group is Ameriprise Advisor Services, Inc. ("AASI", formerly known asH&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc.), a registered broker-dealer that provides brokerage and investment advisory services to retail clients. AMPF Holding Corporation's results of operations are included in our Advice & Wealth Management segment.

RiverSource Distributors, Inc. ("RiverSource Distributors") is a broker-dealer subsidiary whichthat serves as a co-principal underwriter and distributor of ourRiverSource andSeligman mutual funds and as the principal underwriter andand/or distributor for ourRiverSource annuities and insurance products sold through AFSI and SAI as well as through third-party channels such as banks and broker-dealer networks.channels. Its results of operations are included in our Asset Management, Annuities and Protection segments.

RiverSource Life Insurance Company ("RiverSource Life") conducts its insurance and annuity business in states other than New York. Its results of operations for our annuities business are included primarily in the Annuities segment, and its results of operations with respect to otherour life and health insurance products it manufactures are reflected primarily in the Protection segment. Investment income on excess capital is reported in the Corporate & Other segment.

RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York ("RiverSource Life of NY") conducts its insurance and annuity business in the State of New York. Its results of operations for our annuities business are included primarily in the Annuities segment, and its results of operations with respect to otherour life and health insurance products it manufactures are reflected primarily in the Protection segment. Investment income on excess capital is reported in the Corporate & Other segment. RiverSource Life of NY is a wholly owned subsidiary of RiverSource Life. We refer to RiverSource Life and RiverSource Life of NY as the "RiverSource Life companies."



RiverSource Service Corporation  is a transfer agent that processes client transactions for our RiverSource mutual funds and Ameriprise face-amount certificates. Its results of operations are included in our Asset Management segment.

IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company ("IDS Property Casualty" or "Ameriprise Auto & Home") provides personal auto, home and excess liability insurance products.Ameriprise Insurance Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of IDS Property Casualty, is also licensed to provide these products. The results of operations of these companies are included in the Protection segment.

Ameriprise Certificate Company issues a variety of face-amount certificates, which are a type of investment product.certificates. Its results of operations are included in the Advice & Wealth Management segment.

Ameriprise Trust Company provides trust services to individuals and businesses. Its results of operations are included in the Asset Management segment.


Table of Contents

Ameriprise Bank, FSB ("Ameriprise Bank") offers a variety of consumer banking and lending products and personal trust and related services. Its results of operations are included in the Advice & Wealth Management segment.


Table of Contents


Our Segments—Segments — Advice & Wealth Management

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planning and advice, as well as full servicefull-service brokerage and banking services, primarily to retail clients through our affiliated financial advisors. Our affiliated financial advisors utilizehave access to a diversified selection of both proprietaryaffiliated and non-proprietarynon-affiliated products to help clients meet their financial needs. A significant portion of revenues in this segment is fee-based, driven by the level of client assets, which is impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. We also earn net investment income on owned assets primarily from certificate and banking products. This segment earns revenues (distribution fees) for distributing non-proprietaryproviding non-affiliated products and earns intersegment revenues (distribution fees) for distributingproviding our proprietaryaffiliated products and services to our retail clients. Intersegment expenses for this segment include expenses for investment management services provided by our Asset Management segment. All intersegment activity is eliminated in our consolidated results. In 2008, 34%2011, 28% of our revenues from external clients waswere attributable to our Advice & Wealth Management business.

Our Financial Advisor Platform

We provide clients financial planning, advice and brokerage services through our nationwide network of more than 12,4009,700 affiliated financial advisors. Our network currently includes more than 10,500 branded advisors, of which approximately 2,800more than 2,200 are employees of our company and approximately 7,700more than 7,500 are independent franchisees or employees or contractors of franchisees. Our network also includes approximately 1,900 non-employeeWith the sale of Securities America, we no longer offer a platform for unbranded advisors of SAI. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we acquired H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc. (which was renamed as AASI) and Brecek & Young, adding approximately 950 employee branded advisors and approximately 300 independent advisors, respectively. We believe our branded advisor network had the fourth largest advisor sales force in the United States in 2008.financial advisors.

Advisors who use our brand name can choose to affiliate with our company in two different ways. Each affiliation offers different levels of support and compensation, with the rateamount of commissioncompensation we pay to each branded advisor determined by a schedule that takes into account the type of service or product provided, the type of branded advisor affiliation and other criteria. The affiliation options are:

During 2011, we took a number of steps to enhance the public awareness of the Ameriprise brand and the performance of our affiliated advisors. In September, we introduced a new advertising campaign that builds on our MORE WITHIN REACH® brand platform and highlights the Company's rich history, financial strength and commitment to clients. We continued to invest in and implement the conversion to an enhanced brokerage platform designed to be the core technology tool our affiliated advisors use to service clients. The enhanced technology platform integrates with other advisor resources to help advisors run a more efficient practice, increase productivity and offer clients additional products and services. We expect to have all advisors on this technology platform by the end of 2012. We also continued to recruit experienced financial advisors from other firms and to affiliate such advisors within our affiliated advisor platform. Over the past three years, more than 1,100 experienced financial advisors have joined Ameriprise.

Our strong financial advisor retention rate speaks to the value proposition we offer advisors. As of December 31, 2008,2011, over 45%55% of our brandedaffiliated advisors had been with us for more than 10 years, with an average tenure of nearly 18 years. Among brandedaffiliated advisors who have been with us for more than 10 years, we have a retention rate of over 95%97%. We believe this success is driven by the choiceaffiliation choices we offer brandedaffiliated advisors, about how to affiliate with our company, together with our competitive payout arrangements and the distinctivebroad support that helps them build their practices.

Our third platform, the unbranded advisor network served by SAI and its subsidiaries, offers our own and other companies' mutual funds and variable annuities as well as the investment and protection products of other companies.

Each of our three platforms of affiliated financial advisors providescan offer clients access to oura diversified set of cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection, and estate and wealth transfer products and services, as well as a selection of products from other companies, as more fully described below.

Brokerage and Investment Advisory Services

Individual and Family Financial Services

The personalized financial planning approach of our affiliated advisors focuses on all aspects of our clients' finances. After understanding our clients' needs, our advisors seek to identify solutions to address those needs across four cornerstones:


Table of Contents

cash and liabilities, investments, protection and taxes. We believe this approach helps our clients build a solid financial foundation, persevere through difficult economies and challenging markets, and ultimately achieve their financial goals. We offer a broad array of products and services in each of these categories, including those carrying the Ameriprise Financial, Columbia or RiverSource name, as well as solutions offered by unaffiliated firms.

Our brandedaffiliated advisors deliver financial solutions to our advisory clients by building long-term personal relationships through financial planning that is responsive to clients' evolving needs. We utilize the Certified Financial Planner Board of


Table of Contents


Standards, Inc.'s defined financial planning process of Engage, Gather, Analyze, Recommend, Implement and Monitor. This process involves gathering relevant financial information, setting life goals, examining clients' current financial status and determining a strategy or plan for helping clients meet their goals given their current situation and future plans. Once we have identifiedidentify a financial planning client's objectives, we then recommend a solution set consisting of actions—actions — such as paying down debt, increasing savings and investment, protecting income and assets, creating a will, and including tax qualified formats in the client's allocation of savings and investment—investment — as well as offer products to address these objectives with clients accepting what they determine to be an appropriate range and level of risk. Our financial planning relationships with our clients are characterized by an ability to thoroughly understand their specific needs, which enables us to better help them meet those needs, achieve higherhigh overall client satisfaction, havehold more products held in their accounts and increase the company'sour assets under management.

Our financial planning clients pay a fixed fee for the receipt of financial planning services. This fee is based on the complexity of a client's financial and life situation and theirhis or her advisor's particular practice experience, andexperience. The fee for financial planning services is not based on or related to actual investment performance.performance; however, our clients may elect to pay a consolidated, asset-based advisory fee for financial planning and managed account services. If clients elect to implement their financial plan with our company, we and our affiliated financial advisors generally receive a sales commission and/or sales load and other revenues for the products that we sell to them.they purchase from us. These commissions, sales loads and other revenues are separate from, and in addition to, the financial planning fees we and our affiliated financial advisors may receive. We earned branded financial planning net cash sales in 2008 of $211 million, a 4% increase over 2007. In addition, sales of financial plans increased in 2008, and approximately 46% of our retail clients serviced by branded franchisee advisors and employee advisors of AFSI have received a financial plan or have entered into an agreement to receive and have paid for a financial plan.

Brokerage and Other Products and Services

We offer our retail and institutional clients a variety of brokerage and other investment products and services.

OurAmeriprise ONE® Financial Account is a single integrated financial management account that combines a client's investment, banking and lending relationships. TheAmeriprise ONE Financial Account enables clients to access a single cash account to fund a variety of financial transactions, including investments in mutual funds, individual securities, cash products and margin lending. Additional features of theAmeriprise ONE Financial Account include unlimited check writing with overdraft protection, a co-branded MasterCard,MasterCard® debit card, online bill payments, ATM access and a savings account.

We provide securities execution and clearing services for our retail and institutional clients through our registered broker-dealer subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2008, we administered $75.5 billion in assets for clients, an increase of $4.5 billion from December 31, 2007. Clients can use our online brokerage service to purchase and sell securities, obtain independent research and information about a wide variety of securities, and use self-directed asset allocation and other financial planning tools. Clients can also contact their financial advisor and access other services. We also offer shares in public non-exchange traded Real Estate Investment Trusts, ("REITs"),structured notes, and other alternative investments and structured notes issued by otherunaffiliated companies. We believe we are one of the largest distributors of public non-exchange traded REITs in the U.S.

Through AmeripriseAchiever Circle, we offer special benefits and rewards to recognize clients who have $100,000 or more invested with us. Clients who have $500,000 or more invested with us are eligible for AmeripriseAchiever Circle Elite, which includes additional benefits. To qualify for and maintainAchiever Circle orAchiever Circle Elite status, clients must meet certain eligibility and maintenance requirements. Special benefits of the program may include fee reductions or waivers onAmeriprise® IRAs and theAmeriprise ONE Financial Account, aAccounts, fee-waived Ameriprise Financial MasterCard®, fee or a preferred interest rate benefits on anAmeriprise Personal® Savings Account, as applicable.or Advantage Savings Accounts, and fee or rate benefits on home equity lines of credit with Ameriprise Bank.

Fee-based Investment Advisory Accounts

In addition to purchases of proprietaryaffiliated and non-proprietarynon-affiliated mutual funds and other securities on a stand-alone basis, clients may purchase mutual funds, among other securities, in connection with investment advisory fee-based "wrap account" programs or services, and pay fees based on a percentage of their assets. This fee is for the added services and investment advice associated with these accounts.services. We currently offer both discretionary and non-discretionary investment advisory wrap accounts. In a discretionary wrap account, we (or an unaffiliated investment advisor) choose the underlying investments in the portfolio on behalf of the client, whereas in a non-discretionary wrap account, clients choose the underlying investments in the portfolio based to the extent the client elects, on their financial advisor's recommendation. Investors in discretionary and non-discretionary wrap accounts generally pay an asset-baseda fee (for investment advice and other services) based on the assets held in that account as well as any related fees or costs included in the underlying securities held in that account (e.g., underlying mutual fund operating expenses, investment advisory or related fees, Rule 12b-1 fees, etc.). A significant portion of our proprietaryaffiliated mutual fund sales are made through wrap accounts. Client assets held in proprietaryaffiliated mutual funds in a wrap account generally produce higher revenues to us than client assets held in proprietaryaffiliated mutual funds on a stand-alone basis because, as noted above, we


Table of Contents

receive an investment advisory fee based on the asset values of the assets held in a wrap account in addition to revenues we normally receive for investment management of the funds included in the account.


Table of Contents

We offer three majorseveral types of investment advisory accounts. We sponsor Ameriprise Strategic Portfolio ServiceAdvantage, a non-discretionary wrap account service, as well as SPS — Advisor, a discretionary wrap account service. We also sponsor Ameriprise Separately ManagedSeparate Accounts (a separately managed account ("SMAs"SMA") program), which is a discretionary wrap account service through which clients invest in strategies offeredmanaged by us andor by affiliated and non-affiliated investment managers andmanagers. We offer a similar program on an accommodation basis where clients transfer assets to us and do not maintain an investment management relationship with the manager of those assets. We also offersponsorActive Portfolios® investments, a discretionary mutual fund wrap account service of which we are the sponsor. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we expanded ourActive Portfolios investment offerings by introducingActive Diversified Portfolios series, which providethat offers six strategic target allocations based on different risk profiles and tax sensitivities.

Our unbranded advisor force offers separate fee based investment advisoryActive Portfolios investments includes:Active Accumulation Portfolios® investments,Active Income Portfolios® investments,Active Diversified Funds Portfolios,Active Diversified Alternatives Portfolios,Active Diversified Yield Portfolios andActive Opportunity ETF Portfolios® investments. Additionally, we offer discretionary wrap account services through Securities America Advisors, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Securities America Financial Corporation,which clients may invest in SMAs, mutual funds and through Brecek & Young's investment management platform, Iron Point Capital Management.exchange traded funds.

Mutual Fund Offerings

In addition to theRiverSourceColumbia Management Familyfamily of Funds,mutual funds (discussed below in "Our Segments — Asset Management — Columbia Management — Mutual Funds"), we offer mutual funds from more than 260 other250 mutual fund families on a stand-alone basisour brokerage platform and as part of our wrap accounts to provide our clients a broad choice of investment products. In 2008, our2011, retail sales of other companies' mutual funds accounted for a substantial portionthe majority of our total retail mutual fund sales. Client assets held in mutual funds of other companies on a stand-alone basis generally produce lower total revenues than client assets held in our own mutual funds, as we areour Asset Management segment does not receivingearn ongoing investment management fees for assets held in the former.funds of other companies.

Mutual fund families of other companies generally pay us by sharing a portion of the revenue generated from the sales of those funds and from the ongoing management of fund assets attributable to our clients' ownership of shares of those funds. These payments enable us to make the mutual fund families of other companies generally available through our financialaffiliated advisors and through our online brokerage platform. We also receive administrative services fees from most mutual funds sold through our distributionaffiliated advisor network.

Insurance and Annuities

We offer insurance and annuities issued by the RiverSource Life companies (discussed below in "Business — Our Segments — Annuities" and in "Business — Our Segments — Protection"). TheRiverSource insurance solutions available to our retail clients include variable and fixed universal life insurance, traditional life insurance and disability income insurance.RiverSource annuities include fixed annuities, as well as variable annuities that allow our clients to choose from a number of underlying investment options and to purchase certain guaranteed benefit riders. In addition toRiverSource insurance and annuity products, our affiliated advisors offer products of unaffiliated carriers on a limited basis, including variable annuities and long term care insurance products issued by a select number of unaffiliated insurance companies.

We receive a portion of the revenue generated from the sale of life and disability insurance policies of unaffiliated insurance companies. We are paid distribution fees on annuities sales of unaffiliated insurance companies based on a portion of the revenue generated from such sales. Such insurance companies may also pay us an administrative service fee in connection with the sale of their products.

Banking Products

We provide consumer lending and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insured deposit products to our retail clients through our banking subsidiary, Ameriprise Bank. Our consumer lending products include first mortgages, home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, and investment secured loans and lines of credit and unsecured loans and lines of credit.loans. We also launched a suite ofoffer credit card products, linked to a new Ameriprise Rewards Program. These includeincluding the Ameriprise World Elite MasterCard, World MasterCard and basicPlatinum MasterCard. The majority of bank deposits are brokered deposits from affiliated broker-dealers or they are in the Ameriprise Personal Savings Account, which is offeredwe offer in connection with theAmeriprise ONE Financial Account described above in "—"Brokerage and Investment Advisory Services — Brokerage and Other Products and Services." We also offer stand-alone checking, savings and money market accounts and certificates of deposit. We believe these products play a key role in our Advice & Wealth Management business by offering our clients an FDIC-insured alternative to other cash products. TheyThese products also provide pricing flexibility generally not available through money market funds.

To manage our exposure to residential real estate, we sell the majority of our originated first mortgage and home equity installment loan products are sold to third parties shortly after origination. All other lending products are originated and held on the balance sheet of Ameriprise Bank, with the exception of investment secured loans, and lines of credit, which are held on the balance sheet of Ameriprise Financial. As of December 31, 2008,2011, there were $380 million$1.15 billion in home loans/equity line of credit balances, $20$11 million in investment-securedinvestment


Table of Contents

secured loan and line of credit balances and $99$234 million in unsecured balances, (including credit card balances), net of premiums and discounts, and capitalized lender paid origination fees.

Ameriprise Bank's strategy and operations are focused on serving brandedaffiliated advisor clients. We distributeprovide our banking products primarily through branded advisor referrals and through our website.affiliated advisors. We believe that the availability of these products is a competitive advantage and supports our financial advisors in their ability to meet the cash and liquidity needs of our clients. We also provide distribution services forserve advisor clients through the Personal Trust Services division of Ameriprise Bank. Personal Trust Services provides personal trust, custodial, agency and investment management services to help meet estate and wealth transfer needs of individual and corporate clients of our branded advisors to help them meet their estate and wealth transfer needs.affiliated advisors. Personal Trust Services also uses some of our investment products in connection with its services.


Table of Contents Ameriprise Bank generally receives an asset-based fee for investment advice and other services based on assets managed, as well as related fees and costs.

Face-Amount Certificates

We currently issue four different types of face-amount certificates through Ameriprise Certificate Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial that is registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.1940 ("Investment Company Act"). Owners of our certificates invest funds and are entitled to receive at maturity or at the end of a stated term, a determinable amount of money equal to their aggregate investments in the certificate plus interest at rates we declare,determine, less any withdrawals and early withdrawal penalties. For two types of certificate products, the rate of interest is calculated in whole or in part based on any upward movement in a broad-based stock market index up to a maximum return, where the maximum is a fixed rate for a given term, but can be changed at our discretion for prospective terms.

At December 31, 2008,2011, we had $4.9$2.8 billion in total certificate reserves underlying our certificate products. Our earnings are based upon the difference, or "spread","spread," between the interest rates credited to certificate holders and the interest earned on the certificate assets invested. A portion of these earnings is used to compensate the various affiliated entities that provide management, administrative and other services to our company for these products. The certificates compete with investments offered by banks (including Ameriprise Bank), savings and loan associations, credit unions, mutual funds, insurance companies and similar financial institutions, which may be viewed by potential customers as offering a comparable or superior combination of safety and return on investment.institutions. In times of weak performance in the equity markets, certificate sales are generally stronger. In 2008, branded financial2011, affiliated advisors' cash sales more than tripled to $2.7 billion, with total certificate reserves of nearly $5 billion.our certificates were $729 million.

Business Alliances

We provide workplace financial planning and 403(b) educational programs to employees of major corporations, and small businesses and school district employees through our Business Alliances group. Our Business Alliances group focuses on helping the individualhelps employees of client companies plan for and achieve their long-term financial objectives. It offers financial planning as an employee benefit supported by educational materials, tools and programs. In addition, we provide training and support to financial advisors working on-site at company locations to present educational seminars, conduct one-on-one meetings and participate in client educational events. We also provide financial advice service offerings, such as Financial Planningfinancial planning and Executive Financial Services,executive financial services, tailored to discrete employee segments.

Strategic Alliances and Other Marketing Arrangements

We use strategic marketing alliances, local marketing programs for our brandedaffiliated advisors, and on-site workshops through our Business Alliances group to generate new clients for our financial planning and other financial services. An important aspect of our strategy is to leverage the client relationships of our other businesses by working with major companies to create alliances that help us generate new financial services clients for us.clients. For example, AFSI currently has relationships with Delta Air Lines, Office Depot, Borders, Inc. and The Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, and AASI has a relationshipstrategic alliance with H&R Block, Inc.

designed to build relationships between our affiliated advisors and the tax professionals of H&R Block, Inc. and to leverage those relationships to better serve both AFSI and H&R Block, Inc. clients through referrals. Our alliance arrangements are generally for a limited duration of one to five years with an option to renew. Additionally, these types of marketing arrangements typically provide that either party may terminate the agreements on short notice, usually within sixty days. We compensate our alliance partners for providing opportunities to market to their clients.

In addition to our alliance arrangements, we have developed a number of local marketing programs for our brandedaffiliated advisors to use in building their client bases. These include pre-approved seminars, seminar-seminar and event-trainingevent training and referral tools and training which are designed to encourage both prospective and existing clients to refer or bring their friends to an event.

Ameriprise Advisor CenterIndia

OurIn early 2012, we began offering retail financial planning and distribution services in India through our subsidiary, Ameriprise Advisor CenterIndia Private Limited ("AAC"Ameriprise India"). We have also established an insurance brokerage entity in India that is a dedicated call center for remote-based saleslicensed to deal in insurance products by India's Insurance Regulatory and service for AFSI. AASI maintains a service group that provides a similar function. It provides support for retail customers who do notDevelopment Authority ("IRDA"). We have accessestablished offices in Delhi, Mumbai and Gurgaon, and we plan to or do not want a face-to-face relationship with a financial advisor. Financial consultantsexpand our reach to other Indian metro areas in the AAC provide personal service and guidancefuture.


Table of Contents

As with our U.S. financial planning business, Ameriprise India provides holistic financial planning services through phone-based interactions and may provideits trained advisor force. Fees are received for delivering financial plans; however, Ameriprise India does not currently sell affiliated investment or insurance products. If clients elect to implement their financial plan, our advisors refer them to third-party product choices in the context of the client's needs and objectives.manufacturers to purchase recommended investment and/or insurance products. We generally receive a commission from such third-party product manufacturers for making these referrals.

Our Segments—Segments — Asset Management

Our Asset Management segment provides investment advice and investment products to retail and institutional clients. RiverSource Investments predominantlyWe provide our products and services on a global scale through two complementary asset management businesses: Columbia Management and Threadneedle. Columbia Management primarily provides U.S. domestic products and services, and Threadneedle predominantlyprimarily provides international investment products and services. We provide clients with U.S. domestic retail products are primarily distributedthrough unaffiliated third-party financial institutions and through our Advice & Wealth Management segment, and alsowe provide institutional products and services through unaffiliated advisors.our institutional sales force. International retail products are primarily


Table of Contents


distributed provided through third parties.third-party financial institutions. Retail products include mutual funds and variable product funds underlying insurance and annuity separate accounts, separately managed accountsaccounts. Institutional asset management services are designed to meet specific client objectives and collective funds. Asset Managementmay involve a range of products, are also distributed directly to institutions through our institutional sales force. Institutional Asset Management products includeincluding those that focus on traditional asset classes, separateseparately managed accounts, collateralized loan obligations, hedge funds, collective funds and property funds. Revenues in thisIn addition to the products and services provided to third-party clients, management teams serving our Asset Management segment provide all intercompany asset management services for Ameriprise Financial subsidiaries. The fees for such services are primarily earned as fees based on managed asset balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. Thisreflected within the Asset Management segment earnsresults through intersegment revenue for investment management services.transfer pricing. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by our Advice & Wealth Management, Annuities and Protection segments. All intersegment activity is eliminated in our consolidated results. In 2008, 18%2011, 27% of our total revenues from external clients were attributable to our Asset Management business.

We have continued to invest in the growth of our Asset Management segment, as we believe such investment affords attractive opportunities for growth and the achievement of our performance objectives. In May 2011, we completed the acquisition of Grail Advisors, LLC ("Grail"), which provides CMIA the capability of offering actively managed exchange-traded funds. In April 2010, we completed the acquisition of the long-term asset management business of the Columbia Management Group from Bank of America. The acquisition significantly enhanced the capabilities of the Asset Management segment by increasing its scale, broadening its retail and institutional distribution capabilities and strengthening and diversifying its lineup of retail and institutional products. The integration of the Columbia Management business, which is expected to be completed in 2012, has involved organizational changes to our portfolio management and analytical teams, changes to our operational, compliance, sales and marketing support staffs and the streamlining of our U.S. domestic product offerings. Prior to the Columbia Management acquisition, in November 2008, we acquired the Seligman companies. The business of the Seligman companies involved the management of open- and closed-end investment funds, hedge funds and institutional portfolios. We believe the Columbia Management, Seligman and Grail acquisitions will help us achieve our goal of delivering consistent, strong investment performance through a variety of products and platforms by enhancing our investment management leadership, talent, technology infrastructure, manufacturing and distribution capabilities.

Revenues in the Asset Management segment are primarily earned as fees based on managed asset balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. We may also earn performance fees from certain accounts where investment performance meets or exceeds certain pre-identified targets. At December 31, 2008,2011, our Asset Management segment had $199.6$436 billion in managed assets worldwide, compared to $285.1 billion at December 31, 2007.worldwide. Managed assets include managed external client assets and managed owned assets. Managed external client assets include client assets for which we provide investment management services, such as the assets of theRiverSourceColumbia Management family of mutual funds, the assets of theandThreadneedle® families of mutual funds and theSeligman® funds, and assets of institutional clients. Managed external client assets include assets managed by sub-advisorssub-advisers we select. These external client assets are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Managed owned assets include certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (such as the assets of the general account and theRiverSource Variable Product variable product funds held in the separate accounts of our life insurance subsidiaries) for which the Asset Management segment provides management services and recognizes management fees. The assets managed by our Asset Management segment comprise approximately 54% of our consolidated owned, managed and administered assets.

For additional details regarding our managedassets under management and administered assets,administration, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Columbia Management

InvestmentThe investment management activities of Columbia Management Capabilitiesare conducted primarily through investment management teams located throughout the United States. Each investment management team may focus on particular investment strategies, asset types, products and Development

Our investment managementon services offered and distribution channels utilized. These teams manage the majority of assets in our RiverSource, Threadneedle and Seligman familiesColumbia Management family of mutual funds, as well as the assets we manage for institutional clients in separately managed accounts, collective funds, hedge funds, the general and separate accounts of the


Table of Contents

RiverSource Life companies, and the assets of our face-amount certificate company.IDS Property Casualty and Ameriprise Certificate Company and the investment portfolio of Ameriprise Bank. These investment management teams also manage assets under sub-advisory arrangements.

We believe that delivering consistent, and strong investment performance will positively impact our assets under management by increasing the competitiveness and attractiveness of many of our investment products. We have implemented different approachesTo achieve such performance, our investment teams are using a "5P" process that focuses on the five factors we believe are most significant for delivering results to clients: product definition, investment philosophy, people, investment process and performance expectation. These factors are continuously monitored and provide a framework around which portfolio managers can better define their objectives and the processes through which they plan to achieve them.

Each investment management dependingteam focuses on whether the investments in our portfolio are fixed income or equity.

Fixed Income.  In the United States, our fixed incomeparticular investment strategies and product sets. Our U.S. investment management teams are centralized in Minneapolis, with our leveraged loan team located in multiple locations, including Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Los Angeles.Angeles, Minneapolis, New York, Menlo Park and Portland. We have implemented a multi-platform approach to equity asset management using individual investment management teams with a combination of dedicated centralized analytical and equity trading resources. The portfolios we manage focus on varying sizes and categories of domestic and global equity securities. Our U.S. fixed income teams are organized by sectors, including for example, corporate,investment grade, high yield, municipal, global and structured. They utilize valuation models with both quantitative and qualitative inputs to drive duration, yield curve and credit decisions. This sector-based approach creates focused and accountable teams organized by expertise. Portfolio performance is measured to align client and corporate interests, and asset managers are incented to collaborate, employ best practices and execute in rapid response to changing market and investment conditions consistent with established portfolio management principles.

Equity.  We have implemented a multi-platform approach

In an effort to equity asset management using individual, accountable investment management teams with dedicated analytical and equity trading resources. Each team focuses on particular investment strategies and product sets. Investment management teams are located in Cambridge MA, Minneapolis, MN, New York, NY and Palo Alto, CA, as well as at our affiliates Kenwood Capital Management LLC ("Kenwood"), and Threadneedle.

Kenwood is an investment management joint venture we established in 1998. We own 47.7% of Kenwood and Kenwood's investment management principals own 47.5% of the firm, with the remainder held by Kenwood's associate portfolio managers. Kenwood investment management services are focused on the small- and mid-cap segments of the U.S. equity market.

We offer international investment management products and services through Threadneedle, which is headquartered in Luxembourg and which has its primary operations in London, England. The Threadneedle group of companies provides investment management products and services independent from our other affiliates. Threadneedle offers a wide range of asset management products and services, including segregated asset management, mutual funds and hedge funds to institutional clients as well as to retail clients through intermediaries, banks and fund platforms in Continental Europe, the United Kingdomaddress changing market conditions and the Asia-Pacific region. These services comprise most asset classes, including equities, fixed income, commodities, cashevolving needs of investors, we may from time to time develop and real estate. Threadneedle also offers investment management products and services to U.S. investment companies and other U.S. institutional clients, including certainRiverSource Funds.


Table of Contents

We have continued to invest to deliver consistent and strong investment performance by enhancing our investment management leadership, talent, technology infrastructure and distribution capabilities. Most recently, in November 2008 we acquired the Seligman companies and retained key investment professionals and management to increase the company's alternative investment activities and to add breadth and depth to the RiverSource multi-investment boutique strategy. Seligman offers asset management services emphasizing open- and closed-end mutual funds, hedge funds and institutional accounts. Seligman manages the nation's first growth mutual fund and helped develop single-state municipal funds. Seligman is recognized in particular for its accomplished technology investment team, which manages several retail and alternative portfolios, including Seligman Communications and Information Fund, and for its value-oriented offerings.

In addition to growth through acquisition strategy, we are continuing to capitalize on our broad asset management capabilities by creatingoffer new retail and institutional investment products with new and/or innovative investment strategies, including eight newRiverSource mutual funds, four new Threadneedle hedgeexchange-traded funds, separately managed accounts and four funds within Threadneedle's Open Ended Investment Company ("OEIC") investment range, one of which is a long/short strategy, and two new property unit trusts, all of which launched in 2008.collective funds. We may also provide seed money to certain of our investment management teams to develop new products for our institutional clients.

Asset Management Offerings

Mutual Fund Families—RiverSource, Threadneedle and SeligmanFunds

We provide investment advisory, distribution and other services to three families of mutual funds: theRiverSource,Seligman andThreadneedle mutual fund families.

OurRiverSourceColumbia Management family of mutual funds. TheColumbia Management family of funds consist of the RiverSource Funds, a group ofincludes retail mutual funds; the RiverSource Variable Portfolio Funds ("VP Funds"), a group offunds (both open- and closed-end funds) and variable product funds. Retail mutual funds are available as investment options in variable insurance and annuity products;through unaffiliated third-party financial institutions, the Seligman Funds, a group of retail funds formerly managed by J. & W. Seligman Co. prior to its acquisition by RiverSource Investments, LLC; the Seligman Variable Insurance Trusts ("VITs"), a group of variable product funds; and the Seligman closed-end funds. We offer the RiverSource Funds to investors primarily through ourAmeriprise financial advisor network and to participants in retirement plans through various third-party administrative platforms. We also offer RiverSource Retail Funds through third-party broker-dealer firms, third-party administrative platforms and banks. RiverSource VP Fundsas part of Ameriprise institutional 401(k) plans. Variable product funds are available as underlying investment options in our own RiverSource variable annuity and variable life products. Seligman VIT Funds are available as underlying investment options in unaffiliated variable annuity and variable lifeinsurance products, including RiverSource products. The RiverSourceColumbia Management family of mutual funds includes domestic and international equity funds, fixed income funds, cash management andfunds, balanced funds, specialty funds, absolute return funds and asset allocation funds, including fund-of-funds, with a variety of investment objectives. The consolidation of our legacy asset management business under theColumbia Management brand involved numerous fund mergers, which we completed during 2011. As theColumbia Management family of funds continues to evolve it is likely that additional fund mergers, as well as fund launches, will occur.

At December 31, 2011, our U.S. retail mutual funds had total managed assets of $148.9 billion in 141 funds. The RiverSource Fundsvariable insurance trust funds ("VIT Funds") that we manage had total managed assets at December 31, 20082011 of $38.0$55.9 billion in 75 funds compared to $61.3 billion at December 31, 2007 in 80 funds. RiverSource VP Funds had total managed assets at December 31, 2008 of $19.7 billion in 27 funds compared to $25.6 billion at December 31, 2007 in 2364 funds.

During 2008, the RiverSource Disciplined Large Cap Fund and five RiverSource Disciplined Asset Allocation Variable Portfolio Funds were added to the RiverSource family of mutual funds.

RiverSource Distributors and RiverSource Fund Distributors, Inc. act as the principal underwriters (distributors of shares) for theRiverSource family of mutual funds. In addition, RiverSource Investments actsCMIA serves as investment manager andfor most of our U.S. mutual funds. Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("Columbia Wanger"), a subsidiary of CMIA, also serves as investment manager for certain funds. In addition, several of our subsidiaries perform variousancillary services for the funds, including distribution, accounting, administrative and transfer agency services. RiverSource Investments performsCMIA and Columbia Wanger perform investment management services pursuant to contracts with the mutual funds that are subject to renewal by the mutual fund boards within two years after initial implementation, and thereafter, on an annual basis.

RiverSource Investments earnsWe earn management fees for managing the assets of the RiverSourceColumbia Management family of mutual funds based on the underlying asset values. We also earn fees by providing otherancillary services to the RiverSourceColumbia Management family of mutual funds. RiverSourceHistorically, certainColumbia Management equity and balanced funds haveincluded a performance incentive adjustment that adjustschanged the level of management fees, received, upward or downward, based on the fund's performance as measured against a designated external index of peers. This hasIn 2011, in connection with various initiatives to achieve consistent fee structures across allColumbia Management funds, the boards and shareholders of such funds approved a corresponding impact on managementmodified fee revenue. In 2008,structure that discontinued such performance incentive adjustments. Prior to such discontinuance, 2011 revenues were adjusted downwardupward by $20.5approximately $5.5 million due to performance incentive adjustments. We earn commissions for distributing the RiverSource Funds through sales charges (front-end or back-end loads) on certain classes of shares and distribution and servicing-related (12b-1) fees based on a percentage of fund assets, and receive intercompany allocation payments. This revenue is impacted by our overall asset levels.

The RiverSourceColumbia Management family of funds also uses sub-advisorssub-advisers to diversify and enhance investment management expertise. Since the end of 2003, Threadneedle personnel have provided investment management services to RiverSourceColumbia Management global and international equity funds. In addition to Threadneedle, unaffiliated sub-advisorssub-advisers provide investment management services to certain RiverSourceColumbia Management funds.


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2008, theSeligman family of open-ended mutual funds (which is managed within the structure of RiverSource Investments, but which continues to use the "Seligman" name) consisted of 56 funds with $5.1 billion in managed assets. The three Seligman closed-end funds had $1.2 billion in managed assets at December 31, 2008.

Threadneedle manages three UK-domiciled OEICs: Threadneedle Investment Funds ICVC ("TIF"), Threadneedle Specialist Investment Funds ICVC ("TSIF") and Threadneedle Focus Investment Funds ("TFIF"). TIF, TSIF and TFIF are structured as umbrella companies with a total of 48 (34, 13 and 1, respectively) sub funds covering the world's bond and equity markets as well as money market funds. In addition, Threadneedle manages 13 unit trusts, 11 of which invest into the OEICs, 5 property unit trusts, 1 Dublin-based cash OEIC and 1 property fund of funds. During the third quarter of 2008, Threadneedle began managing 2 new mutual funds in the U.S.

Separately Managed Accounts

We provide investment management services to pension, profit-sharing, employee savings and endowment funds, accounts of large- and medium-sized businesses and governmental clients, as well as the accounts of high-net-worth individuals and smaller institutional clients, including tax-exempt and not-for-profit organizations. Our services include investment of funds on a discretionary or non-discretionary basis and related services including trading, cash management and reporting.

We offer various fixed income and equity investment strategies for our institutional clients with separately managed accounts clients.accounts. Through an arrangement with Threadneedle, and our affiliate Kenwood, we also offer certain international and U.S. equity strategies to U.S. clients. We also offer U.S. equity and a variety of fixed income strategies to non-U.S. clients.

For our investment management services, we generally receive fees based on the market value of managed assets pursuant to contracts thatthe client can typically be terminated by the clientterminate on short notice. Clients may also pay us fees to us based on the performance of their portfolio. At December 31, 2008,2011, we managed a total of $2.6$32.2 billion in assets under this range of services.

Management of Institutional Owned Assets

We provide investment management services and recognize management fees for certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, such as the assets held in the general account of our RiverSource Life companies, the RiverSource Variable Product funds held in the separate accounts of our RiverSource Life companies, and assets held by Ameriprise Certificate Company.Company and the investment portfolio of Ameriprise Bank. Our fixed income team manages the general account assets to produce a consolidated and targeted rate of return on investments while controllingbased on a certain level of risk. Our fixed income and equity teams also manage separate account assets. The Asset Management segment's management of institutional owned assets for Ameriprise Financial subsidiaries is reviewed by the boards of directors and staff functions of the applicable subsidiaries consistent with regulatory investment requirements. At December 31, 2008,2011, the Asset Management segment managed $32.5$40 billion of institutional owned assets, compared to $33.1 billion at December 31, 2007.assets.

Management of Collateralized Debt Obligations ("CDOs")

We provide collateral management services to special purpose vehicles that issue CDOs through a dedicated team of investment professionals located in Los Angeles and Minneapolis.professionals. CDOs are securities collateralized by a pool of assets, primarily syndicated bank loans and, to a lesser extent, high yieldhigh-yield bonds. Multiple tranches of securities are issued by a CDO, offering investors various maturity and credit risk characteristics. Scheduled payments to investors are based on the performance of the CDO's collateral pool. For collateral management of CDOs, we earn fees based on managedthe par value of assets and, in certain instances, we may also receive performance-based fees. At December 31, 2008,2011, excluding CDO portfoliosCDOs managed by Threadneedle, we managed $6.9$5.3 billion of assets related to CDOs.

Sub-Advisory Services

We act as sub-advisor for certain domestic and international mutual funds, and are pursuing opportunities to sub-advise additional investment company assets in the U.S. and overseas. As of December 31, 2008, we managed over $1.3 billion in assets in a sub-advisory capacity.

HedgePrivate Funds

We provide investment advice and related services to private, pooled investment vehicles organized as limited partnerships, limited liability corporationscompanies or foreign (non-U.S.) entities. These funds are currently exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940under either Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) or related interpretative relief and are organized as domestic and foreign funds. For investment management services, we generally receive fees based on the market value of assets under management, as well asand we may also receive performance-based fees.


Table As of ContentsDecember 31, 2011, we managed $2.8 billion in private fund assets.

Ameriprise Trust Collective Funds and Separately Managed Accounts

As of December 31, 2008, $8.5 billion of RiverSource Trust Collective Funds and separate accounts were managed for Ameriprise Trust Company clients, compared to $8.8 billion at December 31, 2007. This amount does not include theRiverSource family of mutual funds held in other retirement plans because these assets are included under assets managed for institutional and retail clients and within the "Asset Management Offerings—Mutual Fund Families—RiverSource, Threadneedle and Seligman" section above.

Collective funds are investment funds that are exceptedexempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and offered primarily through banks and other financial institutions to institutional clients such as retirement, pension and profit-sharing plans. We currently serve as investment manager to 5138 Ameriprise Trust Company collective funds covering a broad spectrum of investment strategies. We receive fees for investment management services that are generally based upon a percentage of assets under management rather than performance-based fees. Ameriprise Trust continues to offer collective funds to retirement plans that were involved in the sale of the defined contribution recordkeeping business that we sold on June 1, 2006.performance. In addition toColumbia Management funds andRiverSource Funds and RiverSource Trust Collective Funds, Ameriprise Trust Company offers separately managed accounts and collective funds to our retirement plan clients.

In addition toAs of December 31, 2011, we managed $6.7 billion of Ameriprise Trust Collective Funds and separate accounts for Ameriprise Trust Company clients. This amount does not include the investment management services described above, our trust company also acts as custodian, and oneColumbia Management family of our brokerage subsidiaries acts as broker, for individual retirement accounts, tax-sheltered custodial accounts andmutual funds held in other retirement plans because these assets are included under assets managed for individualsinstitutional and small-retail clients and mid-sized businesses. Atwithin the "Columbia Management — Mutual Funds" section above.

Sub-advised Accounts

CMIA acts as sub-adviser for certain domestic and international mutual funds, private banking individually managed accounts and common trust funds advised by other firms. CMIA continues to pursue opportunities to sub-advise additional investment company assets in the U.S. and overseas. As with theColumbia Management funds, we earn management fees for these services based on the underlying asset value of the funds we sub-advise. As of December 31, 2008, these tax-qualified2011, we managed over $34.1 billion in assets totaled $72.5 billion.in a sub-advisory capacity.


Table of Contents

Prior to December 15, 2008, Ameriprise Trust Company provided institutional asset custodial services primarily to our affiliates providing mutual funds, face-amount certificates, asset managementRetail Distribution

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. acts as the principal underwriter and life insurance. We received fees for our custody services that were generally based upon assets under custody as well as transaction-related fees for our institutional custody services. On December 15, 2008, we disposeddistributor of our trust company subsidiary's institutionalColumbia Management family of mutual funds. Pursuant to distribution agreements with the funds, we offer and sell fund shares on a continuous basis and pay certain costs associated with the marketing and selling of shares. We earn commissions for distributing theColumbia Management funds through sales charges (front-end or back-end loads) on certain classes of shares and distribution and servicing-related (12b-1) fees based on a percentage of fund assets, and receive intersegment allocation payments. This revenue is impacted by overall asset custody business as partlevels of our continued re-engineering effortsthe funds.

Columbia Management fund shares are sold through both our Advice & Wealth Management segment and through unaffiliated third-party financial intermediaries. Among our third-party distribution arrangements is a strategic distribution agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition of Columbia Management that provides ongoing access to clients of Bank of America affiliated distributors, including U.S. Trust. Fees and reimbursements paid to such intermediaries may vary based on sales, redemptions, asset values, and marketing and support activities provided by the intermediary. Intersegment distribution expenses for services provided by our Advice & Wealth Management Segment are eliminated in our consolidated results.

Institutional Distribution and ServicesHigh Net Worth Distribution

We offer separately managed account services and private funds to high net worth clients and to a variety of institutional clients, including pension plans, employee savings plans, foundations, endowments, corporations, banks, trusts, governmental entities, high-net-worth individuals and not-for-profit organizations. We provide investment management services for insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiaries, as well as hedge fund management and other alternative investment products. These alternative investment products include CDOs availableWe also provide, primarily through our syndicated loan management group totrust company subsidiary and one of our institutional clients. We providebroker-dealer subsidiaries, a variety of services for our institutional clients that sponsor retirement plans. These services are provided primarily through our trust company subsidiary and one of our broker-dealer subsidiaries. We are enhancing our institutional capabilities, including funding institutional product development by our investment management teams and through the recent expansion of ourhave dedicated institutional and sub-advisory sales teams. teams that market directly to such institutional clients.

At December 31, 2008,2011, we managed $46.3$121.4 billion of assets for domesticColumbia Management institutional clients.

International Distribution

Outside the United States, Threadneedle leads our distribution,

We offer international investment management products and services to both retail and institutional clients primarily through Threadneedle, which is categorized along three lines: Retail, Institutionalheadquartered in Luxembourg and Alternatives.maintains its primary investment operations in London. At December 31, 2011, Threadneedle had $113.6 billion in managed assets worldwide.

Retail.Investment Management Capabilities

Threadneedle's investment management activities are conducted primarily from its London office. Threadneedle's investment philosophy is to share investment ideas and alpha generation across teams and asset classes. Each investment management team may focus on particular investment strategies, asset types, products and services offered and distribution channels. These teams manage the majority of assets in theThreadneedle Thefamily of mutual funds, the assets of Threadneedle's alternative investment structures and the assets managed for Threadneedle's institutional clients. These investment management teams also manage assets under sub-advisory arrangements, including certainColumbia Management funds.

Offerings

Threadneedle offers a wide range of products and services, including segregated asset management, mutual funds and hedge funds to institutional clients as well as to retail business line includes Threadneedle's European mutual fund family, which ranked as the ninth largest retail fund businessclients in Europe, the United Kingdom, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. Threadneedle's mutual fund and hedge fund product range includes different risk-return options across regions, markets, asset classes and product structures, which include Open Ended Investment Companies ("OEICs"), Societe d'Investissement A Capital Variable ("SICAV"), unit trusts, Undertakings for Collective Investments in terms of assets under management at December 31, 2008, according to the Investment Management Association, a trade association for the UK investment management industry. Threadneedle sells mutual funds mostly in Europe through financial intermediariesTransferable Securities and institutions. Threadneedle also offers its funds directly or within a multi-manager wrap through an independent UK distribution platform operated by Openwork Limited. Threadneedle provides sales and marketing support for these distribution channels. In February 2009, Threadneedle announced that it had signed a distribution agreement to become a strategic partner and global fund provider to Standard Chartered Bank.offshore vehicles.

Institutional.Threadneedle's institutional business offers separately managed accounts to European and other international pension funds and other institutions as well as offering insurance funds. Threadneedle is expanding distribution of its institutional products in Scandinavia, Continental Europe, the Middle East and Asia.institutions. At December 31, 2008,2011, Threadneedle had $ 55.3$81 billion in managed assets in separately managed accounts (including "—Zurich"including assets as described below) compared to $100.1 billion at December 31, 2007.managed for the Zurich Financial Services Group. Threadneedle distributes its institutional products in Europe, Asia, the U.S., the Middle East and Australia.

For more information on the funds and other investment vehicles and services offered by Threadneedle, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Distribution

Threadneedle has organized its sales force and support services into two major segments: retail markets and institutional markets. The institutional team concentrates on establishing strong relationships with institutional clients and the leading


Table of Contents

global and national consultancy firms. On the retail side,Alternatives.Threadneedle The Alternatives section of Threadneedle's business consists of nine long/short equity funds, one currency fund, one commodities fund, three managed accounts for specific clients that follow hedge strategies, a fixed income hedge fund and four CDO funds. The hedgemutual funds are sold primarily tothrough financial intermediaries and institutions, including banks, and other managers of funds of hedge funds.

Zurich.    Threadneedle's Zurich business comprises the asset management activities for Zurich Financial Services Group ("Zurich"). At December 31, 2008, Threadneedle had separately managed assets under management totaling $45.2 billion for Zurich, compared to $87.7 billion at December 31, 2007. Zurich is Threadneedle's single largest client and represented 61% of Threadneedle's assets under management as of December 31, 2008. However, the annual fees associated with these assets comprise a substantially lower portion of Threadneedle's revenue. Threadneedle provides investment management products and services to Zurich for assets generated by Zurich through the sale of its life insurance products, variable annuity, pensioncompanies, independent financial advisers, wealth managers and general insurance products, as well as other assets on the balance sheetplatforms offering a variety of Zurich. Threadneedle entered into an agreement with Zurich when we acquired Threadneedle for Threadneedleinvestment products. Threadneedle's dedicated Global Financial Institutions team offers internationally coordinated coverage to continue to manage certain assets of Zurich. For investment management of the assets underlying Zurich's UK life insurance and pension policyholder products (which represent 98.7% of the assets managed for Zurich as of December 31, 2008), the initial term of the agreement is through October 2011. For investment management of Zurich's other assets, the initial term ended in October 2006 and was extended in connection with a restructuring of the portfolio and a move to more market-aligned rates and terms.such financial institutions.

Our Segments—Segments — Annuities

Our Annuities segment providesRiverSource Life variable and fixed annuity products to retail clients primarily distributedclients. The RiverSource Life companies provide variable annuity products through our affiliated financial advisors, and to the retail clients offixed annuity products are provided through both affiliated and unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution.and financial institutions. Revenues for our variable annuity products are primarily earned as fees based on underlying account balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. Revenues for our fixed annuity products are primarily earned as net investment income on assets supporting fixed account balances, with profitability significantly impacted by the spread between net investment income earned and interest credited on the fixed account balances. We also earn net investment income on owned assets supporting reserves for immediate annuities and for certain guaranteed benefits offered with variable annuities and on capital supporting the business. Intersegment revenues for this segment reflect fees paid by our Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSourceVIT Funds under the variable annuity contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by our Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by our Asset Management segment. All intersegment activity is eliminated in our consolidated results. In 2008, 21%2011, 24% of our revenues from external clients were attributable to our Annuities business.segment.

Our products include deferred variable and fixed annuities, in which assets accumulate until the contract is surrendered, the contractholder (or in some contracts, the annuitant) dies or the contractholder or annuitant begins receiving benefits under an annuity payout option. We also offer immediate annuities, in which payments begin within one year of issue and continue for life or for a fixed period of time. The relative proportion between fixed and variable annuity sales is generally driven by the relative performance of the equity and fixed income markets. Fixed sales are generally stronger when yields available in the fixed income markets are relatively high than when yields are relatively low. Variable sales are generally stronger in times of superior performance in equity markets than in times of weak performance in equity markets. The relative proportion between fixed and variable annuity sales is also influenced by product design and other factors. In addition to the revenues we generate on these products, which are described below, we also receive fees charged on assets allocated to our separate accounts to cover administrative costs and a portion of the management fees from the underlying investment accounts in which assets are invested, as discussed below under "Variable Annuities." Investment management performance is critical to the profitability of ourRiverSource annuity business as annuity holders have access to multiple investment options from third-party managers within the annuity.business.

Currently, our branded franchisee advisors and branded advisors employed by AFSI are the largest distributors of our products and generally do not offer products of our competitors. Our branded advisors employed by AASI and our independent advisors at SAI currently offer annuities from a broader array of insurance companies. In 2009 or 2010, we will expand offerings available to our branded advisors to include variable annuities issued by a limited number of unaffiliated insurance companies. Our RiverSource Distributors subsidiary serves as the principal underwriter and distributor ofRiverSource annuities through AFSI, SAI, AASI and third-party channels such as banks and broker-dealer networks.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our variable annuity products ranked eleventh in new sales according to Morningstar Annuity Research Center. We continue to expand distribution by delivering annuity products issued by the RiverSource Life companies through non-affiliated representatives and agents of third-party distributors.

We had $9.2 billion of cash sales ofRiverSource annuities in 2008, a decrease of 17% from 2007, as a result of a decrease in variable annuities sales, partially offset by an increase in fixed annuity sales. The relative proportion between fixed and variable annuity sales is generally driven by the relative performance of the equity and fixed income markets. In times of weak performance in equity markets, fixed sales are generally stronger. In times of superior performance in equity markets, variable sales are generally stronger. The relative proportion between fixed and variable annuity sales is also influenced by product design and other factors.


Table of Contents

Variable Annuities

A variable annuity provides a contractholder with investment returns linked to underlying investment accounts of the contractholder's choice. These underlying investment options may include the RiverSource VPVIT Funds previously discussed (see "Business—"Business — Our Segments—Asset Management—Segments — Asset Management Offerings—— Columbia Management — Mutual Fund Families—RiverSource, Threadneedle and Seligman",Funds," above) as well as variable portfolio funds of other companies.RiverSource variable annuity products in force offer a fixed account investment option with guaranteed minimum interest crediting rates ranging up to 4% at December 31, 2008.2011. In 2010, we introduced multiple versions of our RAVA 5SM variable annuity, including RAVA 5 Access® variable annuity, RAVA 5 Advantage® variable annuity and RAVA 5 Select® variable annuity.

Our Portfolio Navigator asset allocation program is available under our variable annuities. The Portfolio Navigator program allows clients to allocate their contract value to one of five funds of funds, each of which invests in various underlying funds. The Portfolio Navigator program is designed to helpallow a contract purchaser to select an asset allocation model portfolio from the choices available under the program,investment options based on the purchaser's stated investment time horizon, risk tolerance and investment goals. We believe the benefits of the Portfolio Navigator asset allocation program includehelps a well-diversified annuity portfolio, disciplined, professionally created asset allocation models, simplicitycontract purchaser tailor the performance of annuities and ease of use, accesslife insurance policies to multiple well-known money managers within each model portfoliotheir specific needs and automatic rebalancing of the client's contract valueto keep investment allocations on a quarterly basis. RiverSource Investments,track over time. CMIA, our investment management subsidiary, designsserves as investment adviser for the funds of funds and periodically updatesall of the model portfolios underunderlying funds in which the Portfolio Navigator asset allocation program, based on recommendations from Morningstar Associates.funds of funds invest.

Substantially all of the variable annuity contracts we issue include guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB") provisions designed to protect clients against market risk. Contract purchasers can choose to add optional benefit provisions to their contracts to meet their needs, including enhanced guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB"), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit ("GMWB") and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit ("GMAB") provisions. Approximately one-third98% of RiverSource Life's overall variable annuity contractsassets include thea GMDB provision and approximately 50% of RiverSource Life's overall variable annuity assets include a GMWB or GMAB features.provision. In general, these features can help protect contractholders and beneficiaries from a shortfall in death or living benefits due to a decline in the value of their underlying investment accounts.

The general account assets of our life insurance subsidiaries support the contractual obligations under the guaranteed benefit provisions the company issuesoffers (see "Business—"Business — Our Segments—Asset Management—Segments — Asset Management Offerings—— Columbia Management —


Table of Contents

Management of Institutional Owned Assets" above). As a result, we bear the risk that protracted under-performance of the financial markets could result in guaranteed benefit payments being higher than what current account values would support. Our exposure to risk from guaranteed benefits generally will increase when equity markets decline, as evidenced by the significant decline experienced in 2008.decline. You can find a discussion of liabilities and reserves related to our annuity products in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K — "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk", as well as in Note 2, Note 10, Note 11 and Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RiverSource variable annuities provide us with fee-based revenue in the form of mortality and expense risk fees, marketing support and administrative fees, fees charged for optional features elected by the contractholder, and other contract charges. We receive marketing support payments from the VPVIT Funds underlying our variable annuity products as well as Rule 12b-1 distribution and servicing-related fees from the VPVIT Funds and the underlying funds of other companies. In addition, we receive marketing support payments from the affiliates of other companies' funds included as investment options in ourRiverSource variable annuity products.

Fixed Annuities

RiverSource fixed annuity products provide a contractholder with cash value that increases by a fixed or indexed interest rate. We periodically reset rates at our discretion subject to certain policy terms establishing minimum guaranteed interest crediting rates. Our earnings from fixed annuities are based upon the spread between rates earned on assets purchased with fixed annuity deposits and the rates at which interest is credited to ourRiverSource fixed annuity contracts.

We previously offeredIn 2007, we discontinued new sales of equity indexed annuities. In 2007, new sales were discontinued.annuities, although we continue to service existing policies.

RiverSource fixed annuity contracts in force provide guaranteed minimum interest crediting rates ranging from 1.5%1.0% to 5.0% at December 31, 2008.2011. New contracts issued provide guaranteed minimum interest rates in compliance with state laws providing for indexed guaranteed rates.laws.

Liabilities and Reserves for Annuities

We maintain adequate financial reserves to cover the risks associated with guaranteed benefit provisions added to variable annuity contracts in addition to liabilities arising from fixed and variable annuity base contracts. You can find a discussion of liabilities and reserves related to our annuity products in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk", as well as in Note 2, Note 10, Note 11 and Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

Financial Strength Ratings

Our insurance company subsidiaries that issueRiverSource annuity products receive ratings from independent rating organizations. Ratings are important to maintainingmaintain public confidence in our insurance subsidiaries and our protection and annuity products. For a discussion of the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries, see the "Our Segments—Protection—Segments — Protection — Financial Strength Ratings" section, below.

Third-Party Distribution Channels

Our RiverSource Distributors subsidiary is a registered broker-dealer that serves as the principal underwriter and distributor ofRiverSource variable and fixed annuities through AFSI, as well as serving as the distributor of fixed annuities through third-party channels such as banks and broker-dealer networks. Our affiliated advisors are the largest providers ofRiverSource annuity products, are offered to retail clientsalthough they can offer variable annuities from a select number of unaffiliated insurers as well.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, RiverSource Life companies discontinued the sale of variable annuity products through third-party channels such as Wachovia Securities, Inc., SunTrust Securities, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, Inc.in order to focus on the distribution of variable annuity products within our Advice & Wealth Management segment. We continue to provideRiverSource fixed annuity products through third-party channels. In 2011, we had total cash sales for fixed annuity products through third-party channels of $158 million. As of December 31, 2008,2011, we had distribution agreements forRiverSource fixed annuity products in place with approximately 130more than 120 third parties, with annual cash sales of $1.7 billion in 2008.party firms.

Our Segments—Segments — Protection

Our Protection segment provides a variety of protection products to address the protection and risk management needs of our retail clients, including life, disability income and property-casualty insurance. These products are designed to provide a lifetime of solutions that allow clients to protect income, grow assets and give to loved ones or charity.

Life and disability income products are primarily distributedprovided through our brandedaffiliated advisors. Our property-casualty products are sold direct, primarily through affinity relationships. We issue insurance policies through our life insurance subsidiaries and the Property Casualty companies (as defined below under "Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance Products"). The primary sources of revenues for this segment are premiums, fees and charges that we receive to assume insurance-related risk. We earn net


Table of Contents

investment income on owned assets supporting insurance reserves and capital supporting the business. We also receive fees based on the level of assets supporting variable universal life separate account balances. This segment earns intersegment revenues from fees paid by our Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSourceVIT Funds under the variable universal life contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by our Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by our Asset Management segment. All intersegment activity is eliminated in consolidation. In 2008, 27%2011, 19% of our revenues from external clients were attributable to our Protection business.

RiverSource Insurance Products

Through the RiverSource Life companies, we are the issuers ofissue both variable and fixed universal life insurance, traditional life insurance and disability income insurance. These solutions are designed to help clients protect their income, grow assets and give to those individuals or causes that they care most about. Universal life insurance is a form of permanent life insurance characterized by flexible premiums, flexible death benefits and unbundled pricing factors (i.e., mortality, interest and expenses). Traditional life insurance refers to whole and term life insurance policies that pay a specified sum to a beneficiary upon death of the insured for a fixed premium. Variable universal life insurance combines the premium and death benefit flexibility of universal life with underlying fund investment flexibility and the risks associated therewith. Traditional life insurance refers to whole and term life insurance policies. While traditional life insurance typically pays a specified sum to a beneficiary upon death of the insured for a fixed premium, we also offer a term life insurance product that will generally pay the death benefit in the form of a monthly income stream to a date specified at issue. We also offer a chronic care rider, AdvanceSource® rider, on our new permanent insurance products. This rider allows its policy holder to accelerate a portion of the life insurance death benefit in the event of a qualified chronic care need.

Our sales ofRiverSource individual life insurance in 2008,2011, as measured by scheduled annual premiums, lump sum and excess premiums, consisted of 71%30% variable universal life, 22%65% fixed universal life and 7%5% traditional life. Our RiverSource Life companies issue only non-participating policies whichthat do not pay dividends to policyholders from the insurer's earnings.

Assets supporting policy values associated with fixed account life insurance and annuity products, as well as those assets associated with fixed account investment options under variable insurance and annuity products (collectively referred to as the "fixed accounts"), are part of the RiverSource Life companies' general accounts. Under fixed accounts, the RiverSource Life companies bear the investment risk. More information on the RiverSource Life companies' general accounts is found under "Business—"Business — Our Segments—Asset Management—Segments — Asset Management Offerings—— Columbia Management — Management of Institutional Owned Assets" above.

Variable Universal Life Insurance

We are a leader in variable universal life insurance. Variable universal life insurance provides life insurance coverage along with investment returns linked to underlying investment accounts of the policyholder's choice. Options may include RiverSource VPVIT Funds discussed above, Portfolio Navigator funds of funds, as well as variable portfolio funds of other companies.RiverSource variable universal life insurance products in force offer a fixed account investment option with guaranteed minimum interest crediting rates ranging from 3.0% to 4.5% at December 31, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, RiverSource Life ranked fifth in sales of variable universal life based on total premiums (according to the Tillinghast-Towers Perrin's Value survey).


Table of Contents2011.

Fixed Universal Life Insurance and Traditional Whole Life Insurance

Fixed universal life and traditional whole life insurance policies do not subject the policyholder to the investment risks associated with variable universal life insurance.

RiverSource fixed universal life insurance products provide life insurance coverage and cash value that increases by a fixed interest rate. The rate is periodically reset at the discretion of the issuing company subject to certain policy terms relative to minimum interest crediting rates.RiverSource fixed universal life insurance policies in force providedprovide guaranteed minimum interest crediting rates ranging from 3.0%2.0% to 5.0% at December 31, 2008. We also offer2011. The majority of fixed universal life policies issued in recent years provide a secondary guarantee that ensures, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges. In 2009, we discontinued new sales of traditional whole life insurance; however, we continue to service existing policies. Our in force traditional whole life insurance which combinespolicies combine a death benefit with a cash value that generally increases gradually over a period of years. We have sold very little traditional whole


Table of Contents

In 2011, RiverSource Life began offering indexed universal life ("IUL") insurance. IUL is similar to universal life insurance in recent years. Wholethat it provides life accounts for less than 1%insurance coverage and cash value that increases as a result of ourcredited interest. In addition, as with universal life insurance, sales.there is a minimum guaranteed credited rate of interest. Unlike universal life insurance, the rate of credited interest above the minimum guarantee is linked to the S&P 500 Index (subject to a cap).

Term Life Insurance

Term life insurance provides a death benefit, but it does not build up cash value. The policyholder chooses the term of coverage with guaranteed premiums at the time of issue. During the chosen term, we cannot raise premium rates even if claims experience deteriorates. At the end of the chosen term, coverage may continue with higher premiums until the maximum age is attained, or the policy expires with no value. We also offer a term life insurance product that pays the death benefit in the form of a monthly income stream.

Disability Income Insurance

Disability income insurance provides monthly benefits to individuals who are unable to earn income either at their occupation at time of disability ("own occupation") or at any suitable occupation ("any occupation") for premium payments that are guaranteed not to change. Depending upon occupational and medical underwriting criteria, applicants for disability income insurance can choose "own occupation" and "any occupation" coverage for varying benefit periods. In some states, applicants may also choose various benefit provisions to help them integrate individual disability income insurance benefits with social security or similar benefit plans and to help them protect their disability income insurance benefits from the risk of inflation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we were ranked as the eighth largest provider of individual (non-cancellable) disability income insurance based on premiums (according to LIMRA International®).

Long Term Care Insurance

As of December 31, 2002, the RiverSource Life companies discontinued underwriting long term care insurance. However, our branded financialaffiliated advisors sell long term care insurance issued by other companies, including Genworth Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Life Insurance Company and Genworth LifePrudential Insurance Company.

In 2004, RiverSource Life and RiverSource Life of NY began in 2004 to file for approval to implement rate increases on most of their existing blocks of nursing home-only indemnity long term care insurance policies. Implementation of these rate increases began in early 2005 and continues. We have so far received approval for some or all requested increases in the 50 states where increases have been requested, with an average approved cumulative rate increase of 44.7%76.4% of premium on all such policies where an increase was requested.

In 2007, RiverSource Life and RiverSource Life of NY began in 2007 to file for approval to implement rate increases on most of their existing blocks of comprehensive reimbursement long term care insurance policies. Implementation of these rate increases began in late 2007 and continues. We have so far received approval for some or all requested increases in 4648 states, with an average approved cumulative rate increase of 15.8%23.9% of premium on all such policies where an increase was requested.

AdditionalWe intend to seek additional rate increases may be sought with respect to these and other existing blocks of long term care insurance policies, in each case subject to regulatory approval.

Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance Products

We offer personal auto, home and excess personal liability insurance products through IDS Property Casualty and its subsidiary, Ameriprise Insurance Company (the "Property Casualty companies"). Our Property Casualty companies provide personal auto, home and liability coverage to clients in 4243 states and the District of Columbia.

Distribution and Marketing Channels

We offer the insurance products of our RiverSource Life companies almost exclusively through our branded financial advisors. Our branded franchisee advisors and branded advisors employed by AFSI offer insurance products issued predominantly by the RiverSource Life companies. In limited circumstances in which we do not offer comparable products, or based on risk rating or policy size, our branded advisors may offer insurance products of unaffiliated carriers. We also sell RiverSource Life insurance products through the AAC.


Table of Contents

Our Property Casualty companies do not have field agents; rather, we use co-branded direct marketing to sell our personal auto and home insurance products through alliances with commercial institutions and affinity groups, and directly to our clients and the general public. Termination of one or more of these alliances could adversely affect our ability to generate new sales and retain existing business. We also receive referrals through our financial advisor network. Our Property Casualty companies have a multi-year distribution agreement with Costco Insurance Agency, Inc., Costco's affiliated insurance agency. Costco members represented 77%61% of all new policy sales of our Property Casualty companies in 2008.2011. Through other alliances, we market our property casualty products to certain consumers who have a relationship with Delta Air Linescustomers of Ford Motor Credit Company and offer personal auto, home and liability insurance products to customers of Ford Motor Credit Company.the Progressive Group. Termination of one or more of these alliances could adversely affect our ability to generate new sales and retain existing business.

We offerRiverSource life insurance products almost exclusively through our affiliated advisors. Our affiliated advisors offer insurance products issued predominantly by the RiverSource Life companies, though they may also offer insurance products of unaffiliated carriers, subject to certain qualifications.


Table of Contents


Reinsurance

We reinsure a portion of the insurance risks associated with our life, disability income and long term care insurance products through reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. We use reinsurance in order to limit losses, reduce exposure to large risks and provide additional capacity for future growth. To manage exposure to losses from reinsurer insolvencies, we evaluate the financial condition of reinsurers prior to entering into new reinsurance treaties and on a periodic basis during the terms of the treaties. Our insurance companies remain primarily liable as the direct insurers on all risks reinsured.

Generally, we currently reinsure 90% of the death benefit liability related to almost all individual fixed and variable universal life and term life insurance products. As a result, the RiverSource Life companies typically retain and are at risk for, at most, 10% of each policy's death benefit from the first dollar of coverage for new sales of these policies, subject to the reinsurers fulfilling their obligations. The RiverSource Life companies began reinsuring risks at this level during 2001 (2002 for RiverSource Life of NY) for term life insurance and 2002 (2003 for RiverSource Life of NY) for individual fixed and variable universal life insurance. Policies issued prior to these dates are not subject to these reinsurance levels. Generally, the maximum amount of life insurance risk retained by the RiverSource Life companies is $1.5 million (increased from $750,000 during 2008) on a single life and $1.5 million on any flexible premium survivorship life policy. Risk on fixed and variable universal life policies is reinsured on a yearly renewable term basis. Risk on most term life policies starting in 2001 (2002 for RiverSource Life of NY) is reinsured on a coinsurance basis, a type of reinsurance in which the reinsurer participates proportionatelyproportionally in all material risks and premiums associated with a policy.

For existing long term care policies, RiverSource Life (and RiverSource Life of NY for 1996 and later issues) retained 50% of the risk and ceded on a coinsurance basis the remaining 50% of the risk to a subsidiarysubsidiaries of Genworth Financial, Inc. ("Genworth"). For RiverSource Life of NY, this reinsurance arrangement applies for 1996 and later issues only. As of December 31, 2008,2011, RiverSource Life'sLife companies' credit exposure to Genworth under this reinsurance arrangement was approximately $1.2$1.5 billion. Genworth also serves as claims administrator for our long term care policies.

Generally, RiverSource Life companies retain at most $5,000 per month of risk per life on disability income policies sold on policy forms introduced in most states in October 2007 (August 2010 for RiverSource Life of NY) and they reinsure the remainder of the risk on a coinsurance basis with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. RiverSource Life companies retain all risk for new claims on disability income contracts sold on other policy forms. Our insurance companies also retain all risk on accidental death benefit claims and substantially all risk associated with waiver of premium provisions.

We also reinsure a portion of the risks associated with our personal auto, home and homeexcess liability insurance products through twothree types of reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated reinsurance companies, as follows:

We purchase reinsurance with a limit of $4.6$5 million per loss, and we retain $400,000$750,000 per loss.

We purchase catastrophe reinsurance that, for 2011, had a limit of $90 million per event and we retained $10 million per event. For 2012, our catastrophe reinsurance has a limit of $110 million per event and we retain $20 million.

We purchase catastrophe reinsurance and retain $10 millionthat limits our personal liability insurance exposure to 10% of any loss. This 90% quota share treaty uses the same reinsurers as our excess of loss per event with loss recovery up to $80 million per event.treaty.

See Note 107 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on reinsurance.

Liabilities and Reserves

We maintain adequate financial reserves to cover the insurance risks associated with the insurance products we issue. Generally, reserves represent estimates of the invested assets that our insurance companies need to hold to provide adequately for future benefits and expenses. For a discussion of liabilities and reserves related to our insurance products, see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

Financial Strength Ratings

Independent rating organizations rate our insurance subsidiaries. Their ratings are important to maintaining public confidence in our insurance subsidiaries and our protection and annuity products. Lowering of our insurance subsidiaries' ratings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our protection and annuity products and could lead to increased surrenders of these products. Rating organizations evaluate the financial soundness and claims-paying ability of insurance companies continually, and they base their ratings on a number of different factors, including a strong market position in core products and market segments, excellent risk-adjusted capitalization and highthe quality of the company's investment portfolios. More specifically, the ratings assigned are developed from an evaluation of a company's balance sheet strength, operating performance and business profile. Balance sheet strength reflects a company's ability to meet its current and ongoing obligations to its contractholders and policyholders and includes analysis of a company's capital adequacy. The evaluation of operating performance centers on the stability and sustainability of a company's sources of earnings. The business profile component of the rating considers a company's mix of business, market position and depth and experience of management.


Information concerningTable of Contents

Our insurance subsidiaries' ratings are important to maintain public confidence in our protection and annuity products. Lowering of our insurance subsidiaries' ratings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our protection and annuity products and could lead to increased surrenders of these products. We list our ratings on our website at ir.ameriprise.com. For the financial strengthmost current ratings for Ameriprise Financial, RiverSource Life and IDS Property Casualty can be found in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K underinformation, please see the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources".individual rating agency's website.

Our Segments—Segments — Corporate & Other

Our Corporate & Other segment consists of net investment income or loss on corporate level assets, including excess capital held in RiverSource Lifeour subsidiaries and other unallocated equity and other revenues from various investments as well as unallocated corporate expenses. This segment also included non-recurring costs in 2007 and 2006 associated with our separation from American Express, the last of which we expensed in 2007.

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive global industry. Because we areAs a diversified financial services firm, we compete directly with a variety of financial institutions, such asincluding registered investment advisors, securities brokers, asset managers, banks and insurance companies depending on the type of productcompanies. Our competitors may have greater financial resources, broader and servicedeeper distribution capabilities and products and services than we are offering.do. We compete directly with these entities for the provision of products and services to clients, as well as for our financial advisors and investment management personnel. Our products and services also compete indirectly in the marketplace with the products and services of our competitors.

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment competes with securities broker-dealers, independent broker-dealers, financial planning firms, registered investment advisors, insurance companies and other financial institutions in attracting and retaining financial advisors and their clients. Competitive factors influencing our ability to attract and retain financial advisors include compensation structures, brand recognition and reputation, product offerings and technology and service capabilities and support. Further, our financial advisors compete for clients with a range of other advisors, broker-dealers and direct channels, including wirehouses, regional broker-dealers, independent broker-dealers, insurers, banks, asset managers, registered investment advisers and direct distributors. Competitive factors influencing our ability to attract and retain clients include price, reputation, product offerings and technology and service quality.

ToOur Asset Management segment competes to acquire and maintain owned,retain managed and administered assets we compete against a substantial number of firms, including those in the categories listed above. Our mutual funds, like other mutual funds, face competition from other mutual fund families and alternative investment products such as exchange traded funds. Additionally, for mutual funds, high ratings from rating services such as Morningstar or Lipper, as well as favorable mention in financial publications,Such competitors may influence sales and lead to increases in managed assets. As a mutual fund's assets increase, management fee revenue increases and the fund may achievehave achieved greater economies of scale, that make it more attractive to investors becausemay offer a broader array of potential resulting reductions in the fund's expense ratio. Conversely, low ratingsproducts and negative mention in financial publications can lead to outflows, which reduce management fee revenuesservices, including affiliated products and can impede achieving the benefits of economies of scale. Additionally, reputationservices, and brand integrity are becoming increasingly more important as the mutual fund industry generally, and certain firms in particular,may have come under regulatory and media scrutiny. Our mutual fund products compete against products of firms like Fidelity, American Funds and Oppenheimer.greater distribution capabilities. Competitive factors affecting the sale of mutual fundsinfluencing our performance in this industry include investment performance, in terms of attaining the stated objectives of the particular productsproduct offerings and in terms of fund yieldsinnovation, product ratings, fee structures, advertising, service quality, and total returns, advertising and sales promotional efforts, brand recognition investor confidence, type and qualityreputation. The ability to create and maintain and deepen relationships with distributors and clients also plays a significant role in our ability to acquire and retain managed and administered assets. Additional detail regarding the nature and effects of services, fee structures, distribution, and type and quality of service.

Our brokerage subsidiaries compete with securities broker-dealers, independent broker-dealers, financial planning firms, registered investment advisors, insurance companies and other financial institutions in attracting and retaining members of the field force. Competitive factorscompetition in the brokerage services business include price, service and execution.Asset Management segment is provided below in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K — "Risk Factors."

Competitors of our RiverSource Life companiesAnnuities and Property Casualty companiesProtection segments consist of both stock and mutual insurance companies, as well as other financial intermediaries marketing insurance products such as Hartford, MetLife, Prudential, Lincoln Financial, Principal Financial, Nationwide, Allstate and State Farm.companies. Competitive factors affecting the sale of annuity and insurance products include price, product features, hedging capability, investment performance, commission structure, perceived financial strength,


Table of Contents


claims-paying ratings, service, brand recognition, and distribution capabilities. Competitive factors affecting the sale of life and disability income insurance products include the cost of insurance and other contract charges, the level of premium ratescapabilities and financial strength ratings from rating organizations such as A.M. Best. Competitive factors affecting the sale of property casualty insurance products also include brand recognition and distribution capabilities and price.capabilities.

Technology

We have an integrated customer management system whichthat serves as the hub of our technology platform. In addition, we have specialized recordkeepingproduct engines that manage individual brokerage, mutual fund, insurance and banking client accounts. Over the years we have updated our platform to include new product lines such as brokerage, deposit, credit and products of other companies, wrap accounts and e-commerce capabilities for our financial advisors and clients. We also use a proprietary suite of processes, methods, and tools for our financial planning services. We update our technological capabilities regularly to help maintain an adaptive platform design that aims to enhance the productivity of our affiliated advisors and will allow a faster, lower-cost response to emerging business opportunities, compliance requirements and marketplace trends.

Most of our applications run on a technology infrastructure that we outsourced to IBM in 2002. Under this arrangement, IBM is responsible for all mainframe, midrange and end-user computing operations and a substantial portion of our web hosting and help desk operations. Also, we outsource our voice network operations to AT&T. In addition to these two arrangements, we have outsourced our production support and a substantial portion of ourthe development and maintenance of our computer applications to other firms. In 2009, we initiated a major replacement of our brokerage and clearing platforms, and we continue to roll out that implementation in stages across our affiliated advisor network. We expect to have all advisors on this technology platform by the end of 2012.


Table of Contents

We have developed a comprehensive business continuity plan that covers business disruptions of varying severity and scope and addresses the loss of a geographic area, building, staff, data systems and/or telecommunications capabilities. We review and test our business continuity plan on an ongoing basis and update it as necessary, and we require our key technology vendors and service providers to do the same. Under our business continuity plan, we expect to be able to continue doing business and to resume operations with minimal service impacts. However, under certain scenarios, the time that it would take for us to recover and to resume operations may significantly increase depending on the extent and geographic scope of the disruption and the number of personnel affected.

Geographic Presence

For years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006, over 96%2009, approximately 89%, 88% and 85%, respectively, of our long-lived assets were located in the United States and overapproximately 94%, 94% and 95%, respectively, of our net revenues were generated in the United States. Our foreign operations are conducted predominantly through Threadneedle, as described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under "Business — Our Segments — Asset Management — Threadneedle."

Employees

At December 31, 2008,2011, we had 11,093 11,139��employees, including 2,8232,230 employee brandedaffiliated advisors (which does not include our branded franchisee advisors, or the unbranded advisors of SAI and its subsidiaries, none of whomwho are not employees of our company). We are not subject to collective bargaining agreements, and we believe that our employee relations are strong.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and protect our intellectual property. In the United States and other jurisdictions, we have established certain service marks and brand names that we consider important to the marketing of our products and services, including but not limited to Ameriprise Financial, Columbia Management, RiverSource and Threadneedle. We have in the past and will in the future take action to protect our intellectual property.

Regulation

MostVirtually all aspects of our business, including the activities of the parent company and our various subsidiaries, are subject to extensive regulation byvarious federal, state and foreign laws and regulations. These laws and regulations provide broad regulatory, administrative and enforcement powers to supervisory agencies and other bodies, including U.S. federal and state regulatory agencies, and securities exchanges and by non-U.S.foreign government agencies or regulatory bodies and U.S. and foreign securities exchanges. OurThe costs of complying with such laws and regulations can be significant, and the consequences for the failure to comply may include civil or criminal charges, fines, censure, the suspension of individual employees, and restrictions on or prohibitions from engaging in certain lines of business.

In response to the economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, the laws and regulations governing the financial services industry have continued to evolve. In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act") was enacted into law. The Dodd-Frank Act called for sweeping changes in the supervision and regulation of the financial services industry designed to provide for greater oversight of financial industry participants, reduce risk in banking practices and in securities and derivatives trading, enhance public disclosure, internal control environment andcompany corporate governance principlespractices and executive compensation disclosures, and provide greater protections to individual consumers and investors. Certain elements of the Dodd-Frank Act have since taken effect, though the details of many provisions remain subject to additional studies and the adoption of final rules by applicable regulatory agencies. Domestic and international legal and regulatory changes, including those resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act, have impacted and may in the future impact the manner in which we are regulated and the manner in which we operate and govern our businesses.

The discussion set forth below provides a general framework of the laws and regulations impacting our businesses. Certain of our subsidiaries may be subject to one or more elements of this regulatory framework depending on the nature of their business, the products and services they provide and the geographic locations in which they operate. To the extent the discussion includes references to statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to these statutory and regulatory provisions.

Broker-Dealer and Securities Regulation

Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC as broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and with certain states, the District of Columbia and other U.S. territories. Our broker-dealer subsidiaries are also members of self-regulatory organizations, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), and are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Actregulations of 2002, relatedthese organizations. The SEC and FINRA have stringent rules with respect to the net capital requirements and the marketing and trading activities of broker-dealers. Our broker-dealer subsidiaries, as well as our financial advisors and other personnel, must obtain all required state and FINRA licenses and registrations to engage in the


Table of Contents

securities business. SEC regulations also impose notice requirements and capital limitations on the payment of dividends by a broker-dealer to a parent.

Other agencies, exchanges and self-regulatory organizations of which certain of our broker-dealer subsidiaries are members, and subject to applicable rules and regulations of, include the Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), the National Futures Association and various stock exchanges. One of our broker-dealer subsidiaries is registered with the CFTC and is thus subject to the requirements of the SEC andCommodity Exchange Act. AEIS is a member of the listed company requirements of The New YorkBoston Stock Exchange Incorporated.and is a stockholder in the Chicago Stock Exchange. In addition, certain subsidiaries may also be registered as investment advisers or insurance agencies and subject to the regulations described in the following sections.

We have implemented franchiseAmeriprise Certificate Company, our face-amount certificate company, is regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. As a registered investment company, Ameriprise Certificate Company must observe certain governance, disclosure, record-keeping, operational and compliance standards and strive for a consistently high level of client service. For several years, we have used standards developed by the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc., in our financial planning process. We also participated in developing the International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") 22222 Personal Financial Planning Standard published in December 2005. We put in place franchise standards and requirements for our franchisees regardless of location. We have made significant investments in our compliance processes, enhancing policies, procedures and oversight to monitor our compliance with the numerous legal and regulatory requirements applicable to our business, as described below. We expect to continue to make significant investments in our compliance efforts.

marketing requirements. Investment companies and investment advisers are required by the SEC to adopt and implement written policies and procedures designed to prevent violationviolations of the federal securities laws and to designate a chief compliance officer responsible for administering these policiesofficer. Ameriprise Certificate Company pays dividends to the parent company and procedures. Theis subject to capital requirements under applicable law and understandings with the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, commonly referredMinnesota Department of Commerce.

Ameriprise India Insurance Brokers Services Private Limited ("AIIBSPL"), an Indian subsidiary, is licensed by India's IRDA as a direct insurance broker and is subject to regulation by the IRDA and the Indian Registrar of Companies. AIIBSPL is subject to various ongoing internal control and compliance policies, capital requirements and statutory audit and reporting obligations as FINRA, have also heightened requirements for,a condition to maintaining its license. Further, AIIBSPL employees are required to receive training prior to becoming licensed to provide insurance brokerage services.

Our financial advisors are subject to various regulations that impact how they operate their practices, including those related to supervision, sales methods, trading practices, record-keeping and continued scrutinyfinancial reporting. As a result of the effectivenessDodd-Frank Act, our financial advisors may in the future become subject to a fiduciary standard of supervisory procedures


Tableconduct in connection with their broker-dealer activities that is no less stringent than what is currently applied to investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of Contents

and compliance programs of broker-dealers, including certification by senior officers regarding the effectiveness of these procedures and programs.

Our Advice & Wealth Management business is regulated by1940 ("Advisers Act"). In January 2011, the SEC FINRA, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the National Futures Association, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Officereleased a study recommending such a uniform fiduciary standard of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"), state securities regulatorsconduct for broker-dealers and state insurance regulators. Additionally, the U.S. Departments of Labor and Treasury regulate certain aspects of our retirement services business. Becauseinvestment advisers. In addition, because our independent contractor branded advisor platform is structured as a franchise system, we are also subject to Federal Trade Commission and state franchise requirements. Compliance with these and other regulatory requirements adds to the cost and complexity of operating our business. We maintain franchise standards and requirements for our franchisees regardless of location. We have made and expect to continue to make significant investments in our compliance processes, enhancing policies, procedures and oversight to monitor our compliance with the numerous legal and regulatory requirements applicable to our business.

AFSIInvestment Adviser and AASIAsset Management Regulation

In the U.S., certain of our subsidiaries are registered as broker-dealers and investment advisers with the SEC, are members of FINRA and do business as broker-dealers and investment advisers in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. AASI is also a member of the New York Stock Exchange. RiverSource Distributors, which serves as the principal underwriter and distributor of our annuities and insurance products and a principal underwriter and distributor of our mutual funds, is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC, each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, and is a member of FINRA. RiverSource Fund Distributors, Inc. is also a registered broker-dealer and FINRA member. AFSI, AASI and RiverSource Distributors are also licensed as insurance agencies under state law. The SEC and FINRA have stringent rules with respect to the net capital requirements and activities of broker-dealers. Our financial advisors and other personnel must obtain all required state and FINRA licenses and registrations. SEC regulations also impose notice requirements and capital limitations on the payment of dividends by a broker-dealer to a parent. Our subsidiary, AEIS, is also registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and appropriate states, is a member of FINRA and the Boston Stock Exchange and a stockholder in the Chicago Stock Exchange. Two subsidiaries that use our independent financial advisor platform, SAI and Brecek & Young, are also registered as broker-dealers, are members of FINRA, and are licensed as insurance agencies under state law. Certain of our subsidiaries also do business as registered investment advisers and are regulated by the SEC and state securities regulators where required.

Ameriprise Certificate Company, our face-amount certificate company, is regulated as an investment company under the Investment CompanyAdvisers Act of 1940, as amended. Ameriprise Certificate Company pays dividends to the parent company and is subject to capital requirements under applicable law and understandings with the SEC and the Minnesota Department of Commerce.

Our banking subsidiary, Ameriprise Bank, is subject to regulation by the OTS, which is the primary regulator of federal savings banks,SEC. The Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers, including fiduciary duties, disclosure obligations and record-keeping, and operational and marketing restrictions. Investment advisers are required by the FDIC in its role as insurerSEC to adopt and implement written policies and procedures designed to prevent violations of Ameriprise Bank's deposits. As its controlling company, we are a savingsthe Advisers Act and loan holding company, and we are subject to supervision by the OTS. Furthermore, our ownership of Threadneedle subjects us to the European Union ("EU") Financial Conglomerates Directive to designate a global consolidated supervisory regulator,chief compliance officer responsible for administering these policies and we have designatedprocedures. Our registered investment advisers may also be subject to certain obligations of the OTS for this purpose. Because of ourInvestment Company Act based on their status as a savingsinvestment advisers to investment companies that we, or third parties, sponsor. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and loan holding company, our activities are limitedimpose sanctions for violations of either the Advisers Act or the Investment Company Act, which may include fines, censure or the suspension or termination of an investment adviser's registration. As an outcome of the Dodd-Frank Act, Congress is considering whether to those that are financial in nature, andmodify the OTS has authoritySEC's investment adviser examination program by authorizing one or more self-regulatory organizations to oversee our capital and debt, although there are no specific holding company capital requirements. Ameriprise Bank isexamine, subject to specific capital rules, and Ameriprise Financial has entered into a Source of Strength Agreement with Ameriprise Bank to reflect that it will commit such capital and managerial resources to support the subsidiary as the OTS may determine necessary under applicable regulations and supervisory standards. In the eventSEC oversight, SEC-registered investment advisers.

Outside of the appointment of a receiver or conservator for Ameriprise Bank,U.S., our Threadneedle group is authorized to conduct its financial services business in the FDIC would be entitled to enforce Ameriprise Financial's Source of Strength Agreement. If Ameriprise Bank's capital falls below certain levels,United Kingdom under the OTS is required to take remedial actionsFinancial Services and may take other actions, including the imposition of limits on dividends or business activities, and a directive to us to divest the subsidiary. Ameriprise Bank is also subject to limits on capital distributions, including payment of dividends to us and on transactions with affiliates. In addition, an array of community reinvestment, fair lending, and other consumer protection laws and regulations apply to Ameriprise Bank. Either of the OTS or the FDIC may bring administrative enforcement actions against Ameriprise Bank or its officers, directors or employees if any of them are found to be in violation of the law or engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice.

In addition, the SEC, OTS, U.S. Departments of Labor and Treasury, FINRA, other self-regulatory organizations and state securities, banking and insurance regulators may conduct periodic examinations. We may or may not receive advance notice of periodic examinations, and these examinations may result in administrative proceedings, which could lead to, among other things, censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer or an investment adviser and its officers or employees. Individual investors also can bring complaints against our company and can file those complaints with regulators.

Our Asset Management businessMarkets Act 2000. Threadneedle is regulated by the SEC and the UK Financial Services Authority ("FSA"). Our European fund distribution, which imposes certain capital, operational and compliance requirements. We expect that the FSA's responsibilities for the oversight of Threadneedle will be transitioned to the Financial Conduct Authority by the end of 2012. Threadneedle companies and activities are also subject to local country regulations. Our Australian CDO managementregulations in Europe, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore, the U.S. and Australia. Additionally, many of our subsidiaries are also subject to foreign, state and local laws with respect to advisory services that are offered and provided by these subsidiaries, including services provided to government pension plans. Foreign and state governments may also institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of their local laws, which may include fines, censure or the suspension or termination of the right to do certain types of business is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission ("ASIC").in a state.


Table of Contents

Our trust company is primarily regulated by the Minnesota Department of Commerce (Banking Division) and is subject to capital adequacy requirements under Minnesota law. It may not accept deposits or make personal or commercial loans. As a provider of products and services to tax-qualified retirement plans and IRAs, certain aspects of our business, including the


Table of Contents


activities of our trust company, fall within the compliance oversight of the U.S. Departments of Labor and Treasury, particularly regarding the enforcement of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, commonly referred to as ERISA,amended ("ERISA"), and the tax reporting requirements applicable to such accounts. Our trust company, as well as our investment adviser subsidiaries, may be subject to ERISA, and the regulations thereunder, insofar as they act as a "fiduciary" under ERISA with respect to certain ERISA clients. ERISA and related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code impose duties on persons who are fiduciaries under ERISA, and prohibit certain transactions involving the assets of ERISA plan clients and certain transactions by the fiduciaries to the plans. The Department of Labor is considering proposed regulations that would significantly expand the scope of who is considered an ERISA fiduciary and what activity constitutes acting as an ERISA fiduciary, while prohibiting certain additional types of transactions conducted by persons who are considered fiduciaries.

Insurance Regulation

Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to supervision and regulation by states and other territories where they are domiciled or otherwise licensed to do business. The primary purpose of this regulation and supervision is to protect the interests of contractholders and policyholders. The Minnesota Department of Commerce (Insurance Division), the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, and the New York State Insurance Department (the "Domiciliary Regulators") regulate certain of the RiverSource Life companies, IDSand the Property Casualty and Ameriprise Insurance Companycompanies depending on each company's state of domicile, which affects both our Protection and Annuities segments. The New York State Insurance Department regulates RiverSource Life of NY.domicile. In addition to being regulated by their Domiciliary Regulators, our RiverSource Life companies and Property Casualty companies are regulated by each of the insurance regulators in the states where each is authorized to transact the business of insurance.business. Other states also regulate such matters as the licensing of sales personnel, and in some cases, the underwriting, marketing and contents of insurance policies and annuity contracts. The primary purpose of such regulation and supervision is to protect the interests of contractholders and policyholders. Financial regulation of our RiverSource Life companies and Property Casualty companies is extensive, and their financial and intercompany transactions (such as intercompany dividends, capital contributions and investment activity) are often subject to pre-notification and continuing evaluation by the Domiciliary Regulators. Virtually all states require participation in insurance guaranty associations, which assess fees to insurance companies in order to fund claims of policyholders and contractholders of insolvent insurance companies.companies subject to statutory limits.

The Dodd-Frank Act created the Federal Insurance Office ("FIO") within the Department of Treasury. The FIO does not have substantive regulatory responsibilities, though it is tasked with monitoring the insurance industry and the effectiveness of its regulatory framework and providing periodic reports to the President and Congress. The scope and impact of the research and reports provided by the FIO, and the extent to which such work may ultimately lead to a more prominent role of the federal government in the regulation of the insurance industry, is uncertain.

Each of our insurance subsidiaries is subject to risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements designed to assess the adequacy of an insurance company's capital and surplus in relation to its investment and insurance risks. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") defines risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements forhas established RBC standards that virtually all state insurance companies.departments have adopted, with minor modifications. The RBC requirements are used by the NAIC and state insurance regulators to identify companies that merit regulatory actions designed to protect policyholders. Our RiverSource Life companies and Property Casualty companies would beare subject to various levels of regulatory intervention should their total adjusted statutory capital fall below thedefined RBC requirement.action levels. At the "company action level," defined as total adjusted capital level between 100% and 75% of the RBC requirement, an insurer must submit a plan for corrective action with its primary state regulator. The "regulatory action level," which is between 75% and 50% of the RBC requirement, subjects an insurer to examination, analysis and specific corrective action prescribed by the primary state regulator. If a company's total adjusted capital falls between 50% and 35% of its RBC requirement, referred to as "authorized control level," the insurer's primary state regulator may place the insurer under regulatory control. Insurers with total adjusted capital below 35% of the requirement will be placed under regulatory control.

RiverSource Life, RiverSource Life of NY, IDS Property Casualty and Ameriprise Insurance Company maintain capital levels well in excess of the company action level required by their state insurance regulators. For RiverSource Life, the company action level RBC was $551$619 million as of December 31, 2008,2011, and the corresponding total adjusted capital was $2.7$3.1 billion, which represents 494% of company action level RBC. For RiverSource Life of NY, the company action level RBC was $58$41 million as of December 31, 2008,2011, and the corresponding total adjusted capital was $229$254 million, which represents 395%619% of company action level RBC. As of December 31, 2008,2011, the company action level RBC was $124$60 million for IDS Property Casualty and $2 million$648,000 for Ameriprise Insurance Company. As of December 31, 2008,2011, IDS Property Casualty had $436$431 million of total adjusted capital, or 352%718% of the company action level RBC, and Ameriprise Insurance Company had $47$41 million of total adjusted capital, or 2350%6362% of the company action level RBC.

AtAmeriprise Financial, as a direct and indirect owner of its insurance subsidiaries, is subject to the federal level, there is periodic interest in enacting new regulations relatinginsurance holding companies laws of the states where its insurance subsidiaries are domiciled. These laws generally require insurance holding companies to various aspectsregister with the insurance department of the insurance industry, including taxationcompany's state of annuities and life insurance policies, accounting procedures, the use of travel in underwriting, and the treatment of persons differently because of gender with respect to terms, conditions, rates or benefits of an insurance policy. Adoption of any new federal regulation in any of these or other areas could potentially have an adverse effect upon our RiverSource Life companies.

The instability and decline in global financial markets experienced during 2008 and through the present time have resulted in an unprecedented amount of government intervention in financial markets, including direct investment in financial institutions. Governments and regulators in the U.S. and abroad are considering or have implemented new and more expansive laws and regulations which may directly impact our businesses. Additional discussion of potential risks arising from enactment of new regulations can be found in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Risk Factors."

Client Information

Many aspects of our business are subject to increasingly comprehensive legal requirements by a multitude of different functional regulators concerning the use and protection of personal information, particularly that of clients, including those adopted pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, an ever increasing number of state laws, and the European Union data protection legislation ("EU law") as domestically implemented in the respective EU member states. We have implemented policies and procedures in response to such requirements in the UK. We continue our efforts to safeguard the data entrusted to us in accordance with applicable law and our internal data protection policies, including taking steps to reduce the potential for identity theft or other improper use or disclosure of personal information, while seeking to collect and use data to properly achieve our business objectivesdomicile and to best serve our clients.provide


Table of Contents

Generalcertain financial and other information about the operations of the companies within the holding company structure. In addition, transactions between an insurance company and other companies within the same holding company structure must be on terms that are considered to be fair and reasonable.

Federal Banking Regulation

Ameriprise Bank is a federal savings bank subject to regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"), which became the primary regulator of federal savings banks in 2011, and by the FDIC in its role as insurer of Ameriprise Bank's deposits. As a federally chartered bank, Ameriprise Bank is subject to numerous rules and regulations governing all aspects of the banking business, including lending practices and transactions with affiliates. Ameriprise Bank is also subject to specific capital rules. If Ameriprise Bank's capital falls below certain levels, the OCC is required to take remedial actions and may take other actions, including imposing limits on dividends or business activities and directing us to divest the subsidiary. Ameriprise Bank is also subject to limits on capital distributions, including payment of dividends. In addition, an array of community reinvestment, fair lending, and other consumer protection laws and regulations apply to Ameriprise Bank. Either of the OCC or the FDIC may bring administrative enforcement actions against Ameriprise Bank or its officers, directors or employees if any of them are found to be in violation of the law or engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice.

As the controlling company of Ameriprise Bank, Ameriprise Financial is a savings and loan holding company that is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Board of Governors for the Federal Reserve System ("FRB"). In December 2011, Ameriprise Financial elected to be classified as a financial holding company subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (as amended). To ensure continued classification as a financial holding company, both Ameriprise Financial and Ameriprise Bank must be well capitalized, well managed and have a sufficient standing under the Community Reinvestment Act. In the event of our noncompliance with the foregoing requirements, the FRB may require us to take remedial actions to correct such noncompliance and may also impose restrictions on the conduct of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates until such failures are corrected.

Ameriprise Financial is subject to ongoing supervision by the FRB that focuses on our corporate structure, risk exposure across our business segments and any potential weaknesses in control in our operations, management and reporting. As a financial holding company, our activities are limited to those that are financial in nature, incidental to a financial activity or, with FRB approval, complementary to a financial activity. We must also ensure that our depository institutions remain well capitalized. Ameriprise Financial has entered into a Source of Strength Agreement with Ameriprise Bank to reflect that it will commit such capital and managerial resources to support the subsidiary as the OCC may determine necessary under applicable regulations and supervisory standards. In the event of the appointment of a receiver or conservator for Ameriprise Bank, the FDIC would be entitled to enforce our Source of Strength Agreement.

The UnitingDodd-Frank Act established numerous changes to the regulation of depository institutions and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Requiredtheir holding companies, many of which have yet to Interceptbe finalized and Obstruct Terrorism Act, commonly referredmay in the future cause us to further modify how we engage in our banking activities, as well as the USA Patriot Act, was enacted in October 2001 in the wakeactivities of our other businesses.

Parent Company Regulation

Ameriprise Financial is a publicly traded company that is subject to SEC and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules and regulations regarding public disclosure, financial reporting, internal controls, and corporate governance. The adoption of the September 11th terrorist attacks. The USA PatriotSarbanes-Oxley Act broadened substantially existing anti-money laundering legislationof 2002 significantly enhanced these rules and regulations and may continue to evolve. As noted above, the extraterritorial jurisdictionFRB now performs the role of supervisory regulator with respect to Ameriprise Financial following the United States. In response, we have enhanced our existing anti-money laundering programs and developed new procedures and programs. For example, we have implemented a customer identification program applicabletransference of responsibilities from the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") pursuant to many of our businesses and have enhanced our "know your customer" and "enhanced due diligence" programs in others. In addition, we have taken and will take steps to comply with anti-money laundering legislation in the UK derived from applicable EU directives and to take account of international initiatives adopted in other jurisdictions in which we conduct business.Dodd-Frank Act.

We have operations in a number of geographical regions outside of the EUU.S. through Threadneedle and certain of our other subsidiaries. We monitor developments in EUEuropean Union ("EU") legislation, as well as in the other markets in which we operate, to ensure that we comply with all applicable legal requirements, including EU directives applicable to financial institutions as implemented in the various member states. Because of the mix of Asset Management, Advice & Wealth Management, Annuities and Protectionbusiness activities we conduct, we will be addressingcontinually assess the impact of, and insure compliance with, the EU Financial Conglomerates Directive, which contemplates that certain financial conglomerates involved in banking, insurance and investment activities will be subject to a system of supplementary supervision at the level of the holding company constituting the financial conglomerate. The directive requires financial conglomerates to, among other things, implement measures to prevent excessive leverage and multiple leveraging of capital and to maintain internal control processes to address risk concentrations as well as risks arising from significant intragroup transactions. We have designated the OTSThe FRB serves as our global consolidated supervisory regulator under the EU Financial Conglomerates Directive.

Privacy

Many aspects of our business are subject to comprehensive legal requirements by a multitude of different functional regulators concerning the use and protection of personal information, particularly that of clients. This includes rules adopted pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, an ever increasing number


Table of Contents

of state laws, and the European Union data protection legislation as domestically implemented in the respective EU member states. We have also implemented policies and procedures in response to such requirements in the UK. We continue our efforts to safeguard the data entrusted to us in accordance with applicable law and our internal data protection policies, including taking steps to reduce the potential for identity theft or other improper use or disclosure of personal information, while seeking to collect and use data to properly achieve our business objectives and to best serve our clients.

USA Patriot Act

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, commonly referred to as the USA Patriot Act, was enacted in October 2001 in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks. The USA Patriot Act broadened existing anti-money laundering legislation and the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States substantially. In response, we enhanced our existing anti-money laundering programs and developed new procedures and programs. For example, we implemented a customer identification program applicable to many of our businesses and enhanced our "know your customer" "and "due diligence" programs. In addition, we will continue to comply with anti-money laundering legislation in the UK derived from applicable EU directives and international initiatives adopted in other jurisdictions in which we conduct business.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT REPORTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Securities Exchange Act Reports and Additional Information

We maintain an Investor Relations website at ir.ameriprise.com, and we make available free of charge our annual, quarterly and current reports free of charge and post any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable following the time they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. To access these and other documents, click on the "SEC Filings" link found on our Investor Relations homepage.

YouInvestors can also access our Investor Relations website through our main website at ameriprise.com by clicking on the "Investor Relations" link which is located at the bottom of our homepage or by visiting ir.ameriprise.com.homepage. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report or any other report filed with the SEC.


SEGMENT INFORMATION AND CLASSES OF SIMILAR SERVICES
Segment Information and Classes of Similar Services

You can find financial information regardingabout our operating segments and classes of similar services in Note 2625 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Item 1A. Risk Factors.

If any of the followingOur operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, develop into actual events, these eventsincluding those described below, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case,operations and could cause the trading price of our common stock couldto decline. Based on the information currently known to us, weWe believe that the following information identifies the most significant riskmaterial factors affecting our company in each of these categories of risk.based on the information we currently know. However, the risks and uncertainties our company faces are not limited to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.



Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Business

Our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by market fluctuations and by economic and other factors.

Our financial condition and results of operations may be materially affected by market fluctuations and by economic and other factors. Many such factors of a global or localized nature include: political, social, economic and market conditions; the availability and cost of capital; the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices and interest rates, currency values and other market indices; technological changes and events; the availability and cost of credit; inflation; investor sentiment and confidence in the financial markets; terrorism events and armed conflicts; and natural disasters such as weather catastrophes and widespread health emergencies. Furthermore, changes in consumer economic variables, such as the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment, decreases in property values, and the level of


Table of Contents


consumer confidence and consumer debt, may substantially affect consumer loan levels and credit quality, which, in turn, could impact the results of our banking business.business and savings levels in all of our businesses. These factors also may have an impact on our ability to achieve our strategic objectives.

Declines and volatility in U.S. and global market conditions have impacted our businesses in the past and may continue to do so. Our businesses have been and in the future may continue to be adversely affected by the current U.S. and global capital market and credit crises, the repricing of credit risk, equity market volatility and decline and stress or recession in the U.S. and global economies generally. Over approximately the past eighteen months, difficulties in the mortgage and broader capital markets in the United States and elsewhere, coupled with the repricing of credit risk, have created extremely difficult market conditions. These conditions, as well as instability in global equity markets with a significant decline in stock prices, have produced greater volatility, less liquidity, variability of credit spreads and a lack of price transparency. Market conditions have significantly impacted certain structured investment vehicles and other structured credit products, which have experienced rapid deterioration in value and/or failures to meet scheduled payments based on declines in the market value of underlying collateral pools, increased costs or unavailability of credit default hedges or liquidity to their structures, and/or the triggering of covenants that accelerate the amortization or liquidation of these structures. Each of our segments operates in these markets with exposure for ourselvesus and our clients in securities, loans, derivatives, alternative investments, seed capital and other commitments. It is difficult to predict how long theseand to what extent the aforementioned conditions willmay exist, which of our markets, products and businesses will continue to be directly affected in terms of revenues, management fees and investment valuations and earnings, and to what extent our clients may seek to bring claims arising out of investment performance.performance that is affected by these conditions. As a result, these factors could materially adversely impact our results of operations.

Certain of our insurance and annuity products and certain of our investment and banking products are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, and our future costsimpacts associated with such variations may differ from our historical costs. In addition, interest rate fluctuations could result in fluctuations in the valuation of certain minimum guaranteed benefits contained in some of our variable annuity products. Although we typically hedge againstto mitigate some of the effect of such fluctuations, significant changes in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

During periods of increasing market interest rates, we must offer higher crediting rates on interest-sensitive products, such as fixed universal life insurance, fixed annuities, face-amount certificates and certificates of deposit, and we must increase crediting rates on in force products to keep these products competitive. Because returns on invested assets may not increase as quickly as current interest rates, we may have to accept a lower spread and thus lower profitability or face a decline in sales and greater loss of existing contracts and related assets. In addition, increases in market interest rates may cause increased policy surrenders, withdrawals from life insurance policies, annuity contracts and certificates of deposit and requests for policy loans, as policyholders, contractholders and depositors seek to shift assets to products with perceived higher returns. This process may lead to an earlier than expected outflow of cash from our business. Also, increases in market interest rates may result in extension of certain cash flows from structured mortgage assets. These withdrawals and surrenders may require investment assets to be sold at a time when the prices of those assets are lower because of the increase in market interest rates, which may result in realized investment losses. Increases in crediting rates, as well as surrenders and withdrawals, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. An increase in surrenders and withdrawals also may require us to accelerate amortization of deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") or other intangibles or cause an impairment of goodwill, which would increase our expenses and reduce our net earnings.

During periods of falling interest rates or stagnancy of low interest rates, our spread may be reduced or could become negative, primarily because some of our products have guaranteed minimum crediting rates. Due to the long-term nature of the liabilities associated with certain of our businesses, such as long-term care and fixed universal life with secondary guarantees as well as fixed annuities and guaranteed benefits on variable annuities, sustained declines in or stagnancy of low long-term interest rates may subject us to reinvestment risks and increased hedging costs. In addition, reduced or negative spreads may require us to accelerate amortization of DAC, which would increase our expenses and reduce our net earnings.

Interest rate fluctuations also could have an adverse effect on the results of our investment portfolio. During periods of declining market interest rates or stagnancy of low interest rates, the interest we receive on variable interest rate investments decreases. In addition, during those periods, we are forced to reinvest the cash we receive as interest or return of principal on our investments in lower-yielding high-grade instruments or in lower-credit instruments to maintain comparable returns. Issuers of certain callable fixed income securities also may decide to prepay their obligations in order to borrow at lower market rates, which increases the risk that we may have to invest the cash proceeds of these securities in lower-yielding or lower-credit instruments.


Table of Contents

Significant downturns and volatility in equity markets such as we are currently experiencingmay have, had and could continue to have in the past had, an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Market downturns and volatility may cause, and have caused, potential new purchasers of our products to refrain from purchasing products, such as mutual funds, OEICs, variable annuities and variable universal life insurance, which have returns linked to the performance of the equity markets. If we are unable to offer appropriate product alternatives which encourage customers to continue purchasing in the face of actual or perceived market volatility, our sales and management fee revenues could decline. Downturns may also cause current shareholders in our mutual funds and OEICs, contractholders in our annuity products and policyholders in our protection products to withdraw cash values from those products.


Table of Contents

Additionally, downturns and volatility in equity markets can have, and have had, an adverse effect on the revenues and returns from our asset management services, wrap accounts and variable annuity contracts. Because the profitability of these products and services depends on fees related primarily to the value of assets under management, declines in the equity markets will reduce our revenues because the value of the investment assets we manage will be reduced. In addition, some of our variable annuity products contain guaranteed minimum death benefits and guaranteed minimum withdrawal and accumulation benefits. A significant equity market decline or volatility in equity markets such as we have experienced, could result in guaranteed minimum benefits being higher than what current account values would support, thus producing a loss as we pay the benefits, having an adverse effect onwhich would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Although we have hedged a portion of the guarantees for the variable annuity contracts in order to mitigate the financial loss of equity market declines or volatility, there can be no assurance that such a decline or volatility would not materially impact the profitability of certain products or product lines or our financial condition or results of operations. Further, the cost of hedging our liability for these guarantees has increased significantly in recent periods as a result of low interest rates and continuing volatility in the equity markets. In addition, continued heightened volatility creates greater uncertainty for future hedging effectiveness.

We believe that investment performance is an important factor in the growthsuccess of many of our businesses. Poor investment performance could impair our revenues and earnings, as well as our prospects for growth. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from investment management agreements with the RiverSourceColumbia Management family of mutual funds that are terminable on 60 days' notice. In addition, although some contracts governing investment management services are subject to termination for failure to meet performance benchmarks, institutional and individual clients can terminate their relationships with us or our financial advisors at will or on relatively short notice. Our clients can also reduce the aggregate amount of managed assets or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures, for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in investment preferences, changes in our (or our financial advisors') reputation in the marketplace, changes in client management or ownership, loss of key investment management personnel and financial market performance. A reduction in managed assets, and the associated decrease in revenues and earnings, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, certainif our money market funds we advise carry net asset protection mechanisms, which can be triggered byexperience a decline in market value, of underlying portfolio assets. This decline could cause uswe may choose to contribute capital to thethose funds without consideration, which would result in a loss.

In addition, during periods of unfavorable or stagnating market or economic conditions, the level of individual investor participation in the global markets may also decrease, which would negatively impact the results of our retail businesses. Concerns about current market and economic conditions, declining real estate values and decreased consumer confidence have caused, and in the future may cause, some of our clients to reduce the amount of business that they do with us. We cannot predict when conditions and consumer confidence will improve, nor can we predict the duration or ultimate severity of decreased customer activity. Fluctuations in global market activity could impact the flow of investment capital into or from assets under management and the way customers allocate capital among money market, equity, fixed maturity or other investment alternatives, which could negatively impact our Asset Management, Advice & Wealth Management and Annuities businesses. Also, during periods of unfavorable economic conditions, such as the recession currently being experienced in the U.S. economy and other economies, unemployment rates can increase, and have increased, which can result in higher loan delinquency and default rates, and this can have a negative impact on our banking business. Uncertain economic conditions and heightened market volatility may also increase the likelihood that clients or regulators present or threaten legal claims, that regulators may increase the frequency and scope of their examinations of us or the financial services industry generally, and that lawmakers may enact new requirements or taxation which can have a material impact on our revenues, expenses or statutory capital requirements.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, our access to capital and our cost of capital.

The capital and credit markets may experience, and have been experiencing extremeexperienced, varying degrees of volatility and disruption. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers. We need liquidity to pay our operating expenses, interest expenses and dividends on our capital stock. Without sufficient liquidity, we could be required to curtail our operations and our business would suffer.

We maintain abelieve the level of cash and securities which,we maintain when combined with expected cash inflows from investments and operations, is believed adequate to meet anticipated short-term and long-term benefit and expense payment obligations. In the event current resources are insufficient to satisfy our needs, we may need to rely onaccess financing sources such as bank debt. The availability of additional financing willwould depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of


Table of Contents

credit, the volume of trading activities, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity, as well as the possibility that our shareholders, customers or lenders could develop a negative perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects if we incur large investment losses or if the level of our business activity decreases due to a market downturn. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating organizations take negative actions against us.


Table of Contents

Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may also limit our access to capital required to operate our business. Such market conditions may limit our ability to satisfy statutory capital requirements;requirements, generate fee income and market-related revenue to meet liquidity needs;needs and access the capital necessary to grow our business. As such, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue different types of capital than we would otherwise, less effectively deploy such capital, or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility.

The impairment of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers,broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, insurers, reinsurers and other investment funds and other institutions. The operations of U.S. and global financial services institutions are highly interconnected and a decline in the financial condition of one or more financial services institutions may expose us to credit losses or defaults, limit our access to liquidity or otherwise disrupt the operations of our businesses.

Many transactions with and investments in the products and securities of these transactionsother financial institutions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty. In addition, withWith respect to secured transactions, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral we hold cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices insufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to it. We also have exposure to these financial institutions in the form of unsecured debt instruments, derivative transactions (including with respect to derivatives hedging our exposure on variable annuity contracts with guaranteed benefits), reinsurance and underwriting arrangements and equity investments. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to the carrying value of these assets would not materially and adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Downgrades in the credit or financial strength ratings assigned to the counterparties with whom we transact could create the perception that our financial condition will be adversely impacted as a result of potential future defaults by such counterparties. Additionally, we could be adversely affected by a general, negative perception of financial institutions caused by the downgrade of other financial institutions. Accordingly, ratings downgrades for other financial institutions could affect our market capitalization and could limit access to or increase theour cost of capital for us.capital.

The failure of other insurers could require us to pay higher assessments to state insurance guaranty funds.

Our insurance companies are required by law to be members of the guaranty fund association in every state where they are licensed to do business. In the event of insolvency of one or more unaffiliated insurance companies, our insurance companies could be adversely affected by the requirement to pay assessments to the guaranty fund associations. The financial crisis of 2008 and 2009 and subsequent uncertainty and volatility in the U.S. economy and financial markets have weakened the financial condition of numerous insurers, including insurers currently in receiverships, increasing the risk of triggering guaranty fund assessments.

Third-partyThird party defaults, bankruptcy filings, legal actions and other events may limit the value of or restrict our access and our clients' access to cash and investments.

The extreme capitalCapital and credit market volatility that we continue to experiencecan exacerbate, and has exacerbated, the risk of third-partythird party defaults, bankruptcy filings, foreclosures, legal actions and other events that may limit the value of or restrict our access and our clients' access to cash and investments. Although we are not required to do so, we have elected in the past, and we may elect in the future, to compensate clients for losses incurred in response to such events, provide clients with temporary credit or liquidity or other support related to products that we manage, or provide credit liquidity or other support to the financial products we manage. Any such election to provide support may arise from factors specific to our clients, our products or industry-wide factors. If we elect to provide additional support, we could incur losses from the support we provide and incur additional costs, including financing costs, in connection with the support. These losses and additional costs could be material and could adversely impact our results of operations. If we were to take such actions we may also restrict or otherwise utilize our corporate assets, limiting our flexibility to use these assets for other purposes, and may be required to raise additional capital.

Governmental initiatives intended to address capital marketChanges in the supervision and general economic conditions may not be effectiveregulation of the financial industry, both domestically and may give rise to additional requirements for our business, including new capital requirements or other regulations, thatinternationally, could materially impact our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity in ways that we cannot predict.liquidity.

Legislation has been passedIn July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted into law. The Dodd-Frank Act calls for sweeping changes in the United Statessupervision and abroad in an attempt to address the instability in global financial markets. The U.S. federal government, Federal Reserve and other U.S. and foreign governmental and regulatory bodies have taken or are considering taking other actions to addressregulation of the financial crisis, including future investmentsservices industry designed to provide for greater oversight of financial industry participants,


Table of Contents

reduce risk in otherbanking practices and in securities and derivatives trading, enhance public company corporate governance practices and executive compensation disclosures, and provide greater protections to individual consumers and investors. Certain elements of the Dodd-Frank Act became effective immediately, though the details of many provisions are subject to additional studies and will not be known until regulatory agencies adopt final rules. The impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our company, the financial industry and the economy cannot be known until the rules and regulations called for under the Act have been finalized, and, in some cases, implemented over time.

Accordingly, while certain elements of these reforms have yet to be finalized and implemented, the Act has impacted and is expected to further impact the manner in which we market our products and services, manage our company and its operations and interact with regulators, all of which could materially impact our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that may impact our business include but are not limited to restrictions on proprietary trading and investing in or sponsoring certain types of funds, the establishment of a fiduciary standard for broker-dealers, the imposition of capital requirements on financial holding companies, the resolution authority granted to the FDIC, changes in regulatory oversight and greater oversight over derivatives instruments and trading. We will need to respond to changes to the framework for the supervision of U.S. financial institutions, andincluding the creation of the Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") and the transition to the FRB as our consolidated regulator and the OCC as the primary regulator of Ameriprise Bank. For example, if we were to be designated by the FSOC as a federal systemicsystemically important financial institution, we may become subject to additional regulatory oversight and enhanced prudential standards, including those related to capital requirements and risk regulator. Thismanagement standards at the parent company level. To the extent the Dodd-Frank Act impacts the operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital requirements of unaffiliated financial institutions with whom we transact business, those institutions may seek to pass on increased costs, reduce their capacity to transact, or otherwise present inefficiencies in their interactions with us.

It is uncertain whether the Dodd-Frank Act, the rules and regulations developed thereunder, or any future legislation or similar proposals may faildesigned to stabilize the financial markets, or the economy generally. Thisgenerally, or provide better protections to consumers, will have the desired effect. Any new domestic or international legislation and other proposals or actionsregulatory changes could require us to change certain business practices, impose additional costs, or otherwise adversely affect our business operations, regulatory reporting relationships, results of operations or financial condition. Consequences may also have other consequences, includinginclude substantially higher compliance costs as well as material effects on interest rates and foreign exchange rates, which could materially impact our investments, results of operations and liquidity in ways that we cannot predict. In addition, prolonged government support for, and intervention in the management of, private institutions could distort customary and expected commercial behavior on the part of those institutions, adversely impacting us.


Our businesses are regulated heavily, and changes to the laws and regulations applicable to our businesses may have an adverse effect on our operations, reputation and financial condition.

Virtually all aspects of our business, including the activities of our parent company and our various subsidiaries, are subject to various federal, state and international laws and regulations. For a discussion of the regulatory framework in which we operate, see Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K — "Business — Regulation." Compliance with these applicable laws and regulations is time-consuming and personnel-intensive, and we have invested and will continue to invest substantial resources to ensure compliance by our parent company and our subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, registered representatives and agents. Any changes to the laws and regulations applicable to our businesses, as well as changes to the interpretation and enforcement of such laws and regulations, may affect our operations and financial condition. Such changes may impact our operations and profitability and the practices of our financial advisors, including with respect to the scope of products and services provided, the manner in which products and services are marketed and sold and the incurrence of additional costs of doing business. The recent economic crisis has resulted in numerous changes to regulation and oversight of the financial industry, the full impact of which has yet to be realized. Any incremental requirements, costs and risks imposed on us in connection with such current or future legislative or regulatory changes, may constrain our ability to market our products and services to potential customers, and could negatively impact our profitability and make it more difficult for us to pursue our growth strategy.

Certain examples of legislative and regulatory changes that may impact our businesses are described below.

The Dodd-Frank Act mandates numerous changes to both the regulatory framework in which financial services companies operate and the specific regulations with which such companies must comply. Amongst the changes to the regulatory framework are the abolishment of the OTS and the transition of its responsibilities to other federal agencies. As a result, the OCC became the primary regulator of Ameriprise Bank and the FRB became the primary regulator of our parent company. We cannot predict how the transition to these new regulatory agencies, or the environment for supervisory expectations or enforcement actions, will impact us.

Some of the changes resulting from rules and regulations called for under the Dodd-Frank Act could present operational challenges and increase costs. For example, in the area of derivatives, higher margin and capital requirements, coupled with more restrictive collateral rules, could impact our ability to effectively manage and hedge risk. Ultimately these

27        ��


Table of Contents

complexities and increased costs could have an impact on our ability to offer cost-effective and innovative insurance products to our clients. Similarly, the rules governing the capital requirements of financial institutions, both domestic and international, could have an adverse impact on our ability to allocate capital for strategic business purposes, while increasing costs for consumers of financial services.

Any mandated reductions or restructuring of the fees we charge for our products and services resulting from regulatory initiatives or proceedings could reduce our revenues and earnings. In addition,the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we earned $1.6 billion, $1.4 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, in distribution fees. Our ownColumbia Management family of mutual funds paid a significant portion of these revenues to us in accordance with plans and agreements of distribution adopted under Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act. We believe that these fees are a critical element in the distribution of our own mutual funds. In July 2010, the SEC proposed certain measures that would establish a new framework to repeal Rule 12b-1. The proposed changes have been subject to a public comment period and, following any enactment, would be phased in over a number of years. Any industry-wide reduction or restructuring of Rule 12b-1 fees could have a material adverse effect on our ability to distribute our own mutual funds and the fees we receive for distributing other companies' mutual funds, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

We expect that the Department of Labor will reissue proposed regulations in 2012 seeking to change the definition of who is an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA and how such advice can be provided, which applies to both 401(k) plans and IRAs. These proposed regulations will again be subject to a public comment period upon their release. We cannot predict whether or when the regulations may be finalized, or how any final regulations may differ from the previously proposed regulations. If the regulations were to be issued substantially similar to previous drafts, they could impact how we receive fees, as well as how we compensate our advisors and design our investments and services for qualified accounts, which could negatively impact our results of operations.

In October 2011, the FRB, OCC, FDIC and SEC jointly issued a proposed rule that would implement Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (the "Volcker Rule") which contains certain prohibitions and restrictions on the ability of banking entities and their affiliates to engage in proprietary trading and to have certain interests in, or relationships with, a wide variety of investment funds, including but not limited to hedge funds, foreign funds and private equity funds. This proposed rule would significantly impede our ability to launch investment products, including our ability to provide seed capital to US-based and foreign investment funds. We and our subsidiaries would also be prohibited from trading for our own accounts unless such trading qualifies for one of a limited number of exceptions. Additionally, the proposed rule to implement the Volcker Rule has created considerable debate regarding the potential adverse liquidity impact within the financial markets, especially with respect to the trading of non-government fixed income securities. To the extent that liquidity in the financial markets is adversely impacted, we and our clients may experience increased costs and volatility with respect to our business operations and earnings. Significant time and expense will be required to ensure that necessary compliance policies and procedures are implemented and to establish appropriate oversight. The proposed rule could also place U.S. asset managers at a competitive disadvantage in foreign markets. Depending on final parameters of the Volcker Rule, including the breadth of the permitted activities under the Volcker Rule and the nature of the investment funds covered by the prohibitions and limitations under the Volcker Rule, the full impact of the rule on our operations, results and growth strategies cannot be known.

Our insurance companies are subject to extensive lawsstate regulation and regulations that are administeredmust comply with statutory reserve and enforced by different governmental authoritiescapital requirements. State regulators continually review and non-governmental self-regulatory organizations,update these requirements and other requirements relating to the business operations of insurance companies, including foreign regulators, state securitiestheir underwriting and sales practices. The NAIC adopted a change to require principles-based reserves for variable annuities at the end of 2009, and continues to discuss moving to a principles-based reserving system for other insurance regulators,and annuity products. The requirement for principles-based variable annuity reserves, along with a similar risk-based capital requirement adopted previously, may result in statutory reserves and risk-based capital for variable annuities being more sensitive to changes in equity prices and other market factors. It is not possible at this time to estimate the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange, FINRA, the OTS, the U.S. Departmentpotential impact of Justicefuture changes in statutory reserve and state attorneys general. Current financial conditions have prompted or may prompt some of these authorities to consider additional regulatory requirements intended to prevent future crises or otherwise assure the stability of institutions under their supervision. These authorities may also seek to exercise their authority in new or more expansive ways and the U.S. government may create additional regulators or materially change the authorities of existing regulators. All of these possibilities, if they occurred, could impact the way we conduct our business and manage our capital, and may require us to satisfy increased capital requirements which in turnon our insurance businesses. Further, we cannot predict the effect that proposed federal legislation, such as the option of federally chartered insurers or a mandated federal systemic risk regulator, may have on our insurance businesses or competitors.

The majority of our affiliated advisors are independent contractors. Legislative or regulatory action that redefines the criteria for determining whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor could materially impact our relationships with our advisors and our business, resulting in an adverse effect on our results of operations,operations.

Changes in and the adoption of accounting standards could have a material impact on our financial statements.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), the SEC and other regulators change the financial accounting and reporting standards governing the preparation of our financial statements. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in our restating prior period financial statements. These changes are difficult


Table of Contents

to predict, and it is possible that such changes could have a material effect on our financial condition and liquidity.results of operations.

Defaults in our fixed maturity securities portfolio or consumer credit products wouldcould adversely affect our earnings.

Issuers of the fixed maturity securities that we own may default on principal and interest payments. As of December 31, 2008,2011, 5% of our invested assets had ratings below investment-grade. Moreover, economic downturns and corporate malfeasance can increase the number of companies, including those with investment-grade ratings that default on their debt obligations. Default-related declines in the value of our fixed maturity securities portfolio or consumer credit products could cause our net earnings to decline and could also cause us to contribute capital to some of our regulated subsidiaries, which may require us to obtain funding during periods of unfavorable market conditions such as we are experiencing now.conditions. Higher delinquency and default rates in our bank's customer loan portfolio could require us to contribute capital to Ameriprise Bank and may result in additional restrictions from our regulators that impact the use and access to that capital.

If the counterparties to our reinsurance arrangements or to the derivative instruments we use to hedge our business risks default, we may be exposed to risks we had sought to mitigate, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We use reinsurance to mitigate our risks in various circumstances as described in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Business—10-K — "Business — Our Segments—Protection—Segments — Protection — Reinsurance." Reinsurance does not relieve us of our direct liability to our policyholders, even when the reinsurer is liable to us. Accordingly, we bear credit and performance risk with respect to our reinsurers. A reinsurer's insolvency or its inability or unwillingness to make payments under the terms of our reinsurance agreement could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See Notes 2 and 107 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, we use a variety of derivative instruments (including options, forwards, and interest rate and currency swaps) with a number of counterparties to hedge business risks. The amount and breadth of exposure to derivative counterparties, as well as the cost of derivative instruments, have increased significantly in connection with our strategies to hedge guaranteed benefit obligations under our variable annuity products. If our counterparties fail to honor their obligations under the derivative instruments in a timely manner, our hedges of the related risk will be ineffective. That failure could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. This risk of failure of our hedge transactions from counterparty default may be increased by capital market volatility, such as the volatility that has been experienced over the past eighteen months.volatility.

The determination of the amount of allowances and impairments taken on certain investments is subject to management's evaluation and judgment and could materially impact our results of operations or financial position.

The determination of the amount of allowances and impairments vary by investment type and is based upon our periodic evaluation and assessment of inherent and known risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. Management updates its evaluations regularly and reflects changes in allowances and impairments in operations as such evaluations are revised. Historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments or allowances.

The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on management's case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in fair value that considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer, and management uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for recovery. Inherent in management's evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential, which assumptions and estimates are more difficult to make with certainty under current market conditions.


Table of Contents


Our valuation of fixed maturity and equity securities may include methodologies, estimations and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

Fixed maturity, equity, trading securities and short-term investments, which are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, represent the majority of our total cash and invested assets. The determination of fair values by management in the absence of quoted market prices is based on: (i) valuation methodologies; (ii) securities we deem to be comparable; and (iii) assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances. The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on available market information and judgments about financial instruments, including estimates of the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of the issuer or counterparty. Factors considered in estimating fair value include: coupon rate, maturity, estimated duration, call provisions, sinking fund requirements, credit rating, industry sector of the issuer, and quoted market prices of comparable securities. The use of different methodologies and assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.


Table of Contents

During periods of market disruption, including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of our securities. There may be certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data that become illiquid due to the current financial environment. In such cases, morethe valuation of certain securities may require additional subjectivity and management judgment. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation as well as valuation methods whichthat are more sophisticated or require greater estimation, thereby resulting in values which may be less than the value at which the investments may be ultimately sold. Further, rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported within our consolidated financial statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Some of our investments are relatively illiquid.

We invest a portion of our owned assets in certain privately placed fixed income securities, mortgage loans, policy loans, limited partnership interests, collateralized debt obligations and restricted investments held by securitization trusts, among others, all of which are relatively illiquid. These asset classes represented 15%13% of the carrying value of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2008.2011. If we require significant amounts of cash on short notice in excess of our normal cash requirements, we may have difficulty selling these investments in a timely manner or be forced to sell them for an amount less than we would otherwise have been able to realize, or both, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Intense competition and the economics of changes in our product revenue mix and distribution channels could negatively impact our ability to maintain or increase our market share and profitability.

Our businesses operate in intensely competitive industry segments. We compete based on a number of factors, including name recognition, service, the quality of investment advice, investment performance, product features, price, perceived financial strength, and claims-paying ability and credit ratings. Our competitors include broker-dealers, banks, asset managers, insurers and other financial institutions. Many of our businesses face competitors that have greater market share, offer a broader range of products, have greater financial resources, or have higher claims-paying ability or credit ratings than we do. Some of our competitors may possess or acquire intellectual property rights that could provide a competitive advantage to them in certain markets or for certain products, which could make it more difficult for us to introduce new products and services. Some of our competitors' proprietary products or technology could be similar to our own, and this could result in disputes that could impact our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, over time certain sectors of the financial services industry have become considerably more concentrated, as financial institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. This convergence could result in our competitors gaining greater resources, and we may experience pressures on our pricing and market share as a result of these factors and as some of our competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Currently,Historically, our brandedaffiliated advisor network (both franchiseefranchise advisors and those employed by AFSI) distributesprovided annuity and protectioninsurance products issued almost exclusively (in the case of annuities) or predominantly (in the case of protection products) by our RiverSource Life companies. In 2009 or 2010, we expect to expandexpanded the offerings available to all of our brandedaffiliated advisors to include variable annuities issued by a limited number of unaffiliated insurance companies. As a result of this and further openingopenings of our brandedaffiliated advisor network to the products of other companies, we could experience lower sales of our companies' products, higher surrenders, or other developments which might not be fully offset by higher distribution revenues or other benefits, possibly resulting in an adverse effect on our results of operations.


TableIn late 2010, we discontinued the distribution of ContentsRiverSource variable annuities through third-party channels. This could impact the persistency of business sold previously through these channels, possibly resulting in the acceleration of DAC amortization or other adverse effects on our results of operations.


A drop in investment performance as compared to our competitors could negatively impact our ability to increaserevenues and profitability.

SalesInvestment performance is a key competitive factor for our retail and institutional asset management products and services. Strong investment performance helps to ensure the retention of our own mutual fundsproducts and services by our affiliated financial advisor network comprise a significant percentageclients and creates new sales of our total mutual fund sales. We attribute this success to performance, new products and marketing efforts. A declineservices. It may also result in higher ratings by ratings services such as Morningstar or Lipper, which may further exacerbate the levelforegoing effects. Strong investment performance and its effects are important elements to our stated goals of growing assets under management and achieving economies of scale.

There can be no assurance as to how future investment performance will compare to our competitors or that historical performance will be indicative of future returns. Any drop or perceived drop in investment performance as compared to our competitors could cause a decline in sales of our mutual funds and other investment products, an increase in redemptions and the termination of institutional asset management relationships. These impacts may reduce our aggregate amount of assets under management and reduce management fees. Poor investment performance could also adversely affect our


Table of Contents

ability to expand the distribution of our products through unaffiliated third parties. Further, any drop in market share and a commensurate drop inof mutual funds sales by our affiliated advisors may further reduce profits as sales of other companies' mutual funds are less profitable than those fromsales of our own mutualproprietary funds. A decline

We may not be able to maintain our unaffiliated third-party distribution channels or the terms by which unaffiliated third parties sell our products.

We distribute certain of our investment products and fixed annuities through unaffiliated third-party advisors and financial institutions. Maintaining and deepening relationships with these unaffiliated distributors is an important part of our growth strategy, as strong third-party distribution arrangements enhance our ability to market our products and to increase our assets under management, revenues and profitability. There can be no assurance that the distribution relationships we have established will continue, as our distribution partners may cease to operate or otherwise terminate their relationship with us. Any such reduction in investment performance could also adversely affect the realization of benefits from investmentsaccess to third-party distributors may have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products and to generate revenue in our strategyAsset Management and Annuities segments.

Access to expand alternative distribution channels for our ownis subject to intense competition due to the large number of competitors and products including third-partyin the investment advisory and annuities industries. Relationships with distributors are subject to periodic negotiation that may result in increased distribution costs and/or reductions in the number of our mutual funds.products marketed. Any increase in the costs to distribute our products or reduction in the type or number of products made available for sale may have a material effect on our revenues and profitability.

We face intense competition in attracting and retaining key talent.

Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to attract and retain qualified people. We are dependent on our network of brandedaffiliated advisors for a significant portion of the sales of our mutual funds, annuities, face-amount certificates, banking and insurance products. In addition, our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. The market for these financial advisors registered representatives, management talent, qualified legal and compliance professionals, fund managers, and investment analysts is extremely competitive.competitive, as are the markets for qualified and skilled portfolio managers, investment managers, executives and marketing, finance, legal, compliance and other professionals. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified individuals or our recruiting and retention costs increase significantly, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely impacted.

Our businesses are heavily regulated, and changes in legislation or regulation may reduce our profitability, limit our growth, or impact our ability to pay dividends or achieve targeted return-on-equity levels.

We operate in highly regulated industries and are required to obtain and maintain licenses for many of the businesses we operate in addition to being subject to regulatory oversight. Securities regulators have significantly increased the level of regulation in recent years and have several outstanding proposals for additional regulation. Current market conditions and recent events could result in increases or changes in current regulations and regulatory structures, including higher licensing fees and assessments. Significant discussion and activity by regulators concerns the sale and suitability of financial products and services to persons planning for retirement, as well as to older investors. In addition, we are subject to heightened requirements and associated costs and risks relating to privacy and the protection of customer data. Our information systems, moreover, may be subject to increased efforts of "hackers" by reason of the customer data we possess. These requirements, costs and risks, as well as possible legislative or regulatory changes, may constrain our ability to market our products and services to our target demographic and potential customers, and could negatively impact our profitability and make it more difficult for us to pursue our growth strategy.

Our insurance companies are subject to state regulation and must comply with statutory reserve and capital requirements. State regulators are continually reviewing and updating these requirements and other requirements relating to the business operations of insurance companies, including their underwriting and sales practices. Moreover, our life insurance companies are subject to capital requirements for variable annuity contracts with guaranteed death or living benefits. These requirements may have an impact on statutory reserves and regulatory capital in the event equity market values fall in the future. The NAIC has adopted a change to require principles-based reserves for variable annuities at the end of 2009, and continues to discuss moving to a principles-based reserving system for other insurance and annuity products. This could change statutory reserve requirements significantly, and it is not possible to estimate the potential impact on our insurance businesses at this time. Further, we cannot predict the effect that proposed federal legislation, such as the option of federally chartered insurers or a mandated federal systemic risk regulator, may have on our insurance businesses or their competitors.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive. Moreover, the evaluation of our compliance with broker-dealer, investment advisor, insurance company and banking regulation by the SEC, OTS and other regulatory organizations is an ongoing feature of our business, the outcomes of which may not be foreseeable. Changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase our direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business. Our financial advisors may decide that the direct cost of compliance and the indirect cost of time spent on compliance matters outweigh the benefits of a career as a financial advisor, which could lead to financial advisor attrition. The costs of the compliance requirements we face, and the constraints they impose on our operations, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we may be required to reduce our fee levels, or restructure the fees we charge, as a result of regulatory initiatives or proceedings that are either industry-wide or specifically targeted at our company. Reductions or other changes in the fees that we charge for our products and services could reduce our revenues and earnings. Moreover, in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we earned $1.6 billion, $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, in distribution fees. A significant portion of these revenues was paid to us by our own RiverSource family of mutual funds in accordance with plans and agreements of distribution adopted under Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as


Table of Contents


amended, or Rule 12b-1. We believe that these fees are a critical element in the distribution of our own mutual funds. However, an industry-wide reduction or restructuring of Rule 12b-1 fees could have a material adverse effect on our ability to distribute our own mutual funds and the fees we receive for distributing other companies' mutual funds, which could, in turn, have an adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

Consumer lending activities at our bank are subject to applicable laws as well as regulation by various regulatory bodies. Changes in laws or regulation could affect our bank's ability to conduct business. These changes could include but are not limited to our bank's ability to market and sell products, fee pricing or interest rates that can be charged on loans outstanding, changes in communication with customers that affect payments, statements and collections of loans, and changes in accounting for the consumer lending business.

The majority of our affiliated financial advisors are independent contractors. Legislative or regulatory action that redefines the criteria for determining whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor could materially impact our relationships with our advisors, and our business, resulting in adverse effect on our results of operations.

For a further discussion of the regulatory framework in which we operate, see Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Business—Regulation."

We face risks arising from acquisitions.acquisitions and divestitures.

We have made acquisitions and divestitures in the past and expect to continue to do so. We face a number of risks arising frommay pursue similar strategic transactions in the future. Risks in acquisition transactions includinginclude difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses into our operations, difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties in retaining the existing customers of the acquired entities, unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the acquired businesses, the failure of counterparties to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the acquired businesses, and unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our growth expectations for the acquired businesses. Risks in divestiture transactions include difficulties in the separation of the disposed business, the failure of counterparties to satisfy payment obligations, unfavorable market conditions that may impact any earnout or contingency payment due to us and unexpected difficulties in losing employees of the disposed business. These risks may prevent us from realizing the expected benefits from acquisitions or divestitures and could result in the failure to realize the full economic value of a strategic transaction or the impairment of goodwill and/or intangible assets recognized at the time of an acquisition.

A failure to appropriately deal with conflicts of interestprotect our reputation could adversely affect our businesses.

Our reputation is one of our most important assets. Our ability to attract and retain customers, investors, employees and affiliated advisors is highly dependent upon external perceptions of our company. Damage to our reputation could cause significant harm to our business and prospects and may arise from numerous sources, including litigation or regulatory actions, failing to deliver minimum standards of service and quality, compliance failures, unethical behavior and the misconduct of employees, affiliated advisors and counterparties. Negative perceptions or publicity regarding these matters could damage our reputation among existing and potential customers, investors, employees and affiliated advisors. Adverse developments with respect to our industry may also, by association, negatively impact our reputation or result in greater regulatory or legislative scrutiny or litigation against us.

Our reputation is also dependent on our continued identification of and mitigation against conflicts of interest. As we have expanded the scope of our businesses and our client base, we increasingly have to identify and address potential conflicts of interest, including those relating to our proprietary activities and those relating to our sales of non-proprietary products from manufacturers that have agreed to provide us marketing, sales and account maintenance support. For example, conflicts may arise between our position as a provider of financial planning services and as a manufacturer and/or distributor or broker of asset accumulation, income or insurance products that one of our affiliated financial advisors may recommend to a financial planning client. We have procedures and controls that are designed to identify, address and appropriately disclose perceived conflicts of interest. However, identifying and appropriately dealing withaddressing conflicts of interest is complex, and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately withaddress conflicts of interest. interest appropriately.


Table of Contents

In addition, the SEC and other federal and state regulators have increased their scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest. It is possible that potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or enforcement actions. It is possible also that the regulatory scrutiny of, and litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest will make our clients less willing to enter into transactions in which such a conflict may occur, and will adversely affect our businesses.

Misconduct by our employees and affiliated financial advisors is difficult to detect and deter and could harm our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Misconduct by our employees and affiliated financial advisors could result in violations of law, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm. Misconduct can occur in each of our businesses and could include:

binding us to transactions that exceed authorized limits;

hiding unauthorized or unsuccessful activities resulting in unknown and unmanaged risks or losses;

improperly using, disclosing or otherwise compromising confidential information;

recommending transactions that are not suitable;

engaging in fraudulent or otherwise improper activity;

engaging in unauthorized or excessive trading to the detriment of customers; or

otherwise not complying with laws, regulations or our control procedures.

Table of Contents

We cannot always deter misconduct by our employees and affiliated financial advisors, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Preventing and detecting misconduct among our branded franchisee advisors and our unbranded affiliated financial advisors who are not employees of our company and tend to be located in small, decentralized offices, present additional challenges. We cannot also cannot assure that misconduct by our employees and affiliated financial advisors will not lead to a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Legal and regulatory actions are inherent in our businesses and could result in financial losses or harm our businesses.

We are, and in the future may be, subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our operations, both domestically and internationally. Various regulatory and governmental bodies have the authority to review our products and business practices and those of our employees and independent financial advisors and to bring regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our employees or affiliated financial advisors, are improper. Pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings relating to aspects of our businesses and operations that are specific to us and proceedings that are typical of the industries and businesses in which we operate. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants. In certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. See Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Legal10-K — "Legal Proceedings." In or as a result of turbulent times such as these,those we have experienced, the volume of claims and amount of damages sought in litigation and regulatory proceedings generally increase. Substantial legal liability in current or future legal or regulatory actions could have a material adverse financial effect or cause significant reputational harm, which in turn could seriously harm our business prospects.

A downgrade or a potential downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Financial strength ratings, which various ratings organizations publish as a measure of an insurance company's ability to meet contractholder and policyholder obligations, are important to maintainingmaintain public confidence in our products, the ability to market our products and our competitive position. A downgrade in our financial strength ratings, or the announced potential for a downgrade, could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in many ways, including:

reducing new sales of insurance products, annuities and investment products;

adversely affecting our relationships with our affiliated financial advisors and third-party distributors of our products;

materially increasing the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contractholders and policyholders;

requiring us to reduce prices for many of our products and services to remain competitive; and

adversely affecting our ability to obtain reinsurance or obtain reasonable pricing on reinsurance.

A downgrade in our credit ratings could also adversely impact our future cost and speed of borrowing and have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

In view of the difficulties experienced recently by many financial institutions, including our competitors in the insurance industry, we believe it is possible that the ratings organizations will heightenhave heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions willand have requested additional information from the companies that they rate. They may increase the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, will request additional information from the companies that they rate, and may adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the ratings organization'sorganizations' models for maintenance of ratings levels.levels, or downgrade ratings applied to particular classes of securities or types of institutions. Ratings organizations may also become subject to tighter laws and regulations governing the ratings, which may in turn impact the ratings assigned to financial institutions.

We cannot predict what actions rating organizations may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of rating organizations, which could adversely affect our business. As with other companies in the financial services industry, our ratings could be changed at any time and without any notice by the ratings organizations.


Table of Contents

If our reserves for future policy benefits and claims or for our bank lending portfolio or for future certificate redemptions and maturities are inadequate, we may be required to increase our reserve liabilities, which couldwould adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We establish reserves as estimates of our liabilities to provide for future obligations under our insurance policies, annuities and investment certificate contracts. We also establish reserves as estimates of the potential for loan losses in our consumer lending portfolios. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation but, rather, are estimates of contract benefits or loan losses


Table of Contents


and related expenses we expect to incur over time. The assumptions and estimates we make in establishing reserves require certain judgments about future experience and, therefore, are inherently uncertain. We cannot determine with precision the actual amounts that we will pay for contract benefits, the timing of payments, or whether the assets supporting our stated reserves will increase to the levels we estimate before payment of benefits or claims. We monitor our reserve levels continually. If we were to conclude that our reserves are insufficient to cover actual or expected contract benefits or loan collections, we would be required to increase our reserves and incur income statement charges for the period in which we make the determination, which couldwould adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For more information on how we set our reserves, see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Morbidity rates or mortality rates that differ significantly from our pricing expectations could negatively affect profitability.

We set prices forRiverSource life insurance and some annuity products based upon expected claim payment patterns, derived from assumptions we make about our policyholders and contractholders, the morbidity rates, or likelihood of sickness, and mortality rates, or likelihood of death. The long-term profitability of these products depends upon how our actual experience compares with our pricing assumptions. For example, if morbidity rates are higher, or mortality rates are lower, than our pricing assumptions, we could be required to make greater payments under disability income insurance policies, chronic care riders and immediate annuity contracts than we had projected. In 2009, upon regulatory approval, we intend to offer certain optional riders with our new permanent life insurance policies that will enable consumers to access a portion of their death benefit to fund qualified chronic care needs. These policies, if approved and issued, will also subject us to morbidity risk. The same holds true for long term care policies we previously underwrote to the extent of the risks that we have retained. If mortality rates are higher than our pricing assumptions, we could be required to make greater payments under our life insurance policies and annuity contracts with guaranteed minimum death benefits than we have projected.

The risk that our claims experience may differ significantly from our pricing assumptions is particularly significant for our long term care insurance products notwithstanding our ability to implement future price increases with regulatory approvals. As with life insurance, long term care insurance policies provide for long-duration coverage and, therefore, our actual claims experience will emerge over many years. However, as a relatively new product in the market, long term care insurance does not have the extensive claims experience history of life insurance and, as a result, our ability to forecast future claim rates for long term care insurance is more limited than for life insurance. We have sought to moderate these uncertainties to some extent by partially reinsuring long term care policies we previously underwrote and by limiting our present long term care insurance offerings to policies underwritten fully by unaffiliated third-party insurers, and we have also implemented rate increases on certain in force policies as described in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Business—10-K — "Business — Our Segments—Protection—Segments — Protection —RiverSource Insurance Products—Products — Long Term Care Insurance".Insurance." We may be required to implement additional rate increases in the future and may or may not receive regulatory approval for the full extent and timing of any rate increases that we may seek.

We may face losses if there are significant deviations from our assumptions regarding the future persistency of our insurance policies and annuity contracts.

The prices and expected future profitability of our life insurance and deferred annuity products are based in part upon assumptions related to persistency, which is the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Given the ongoing economic and market dislocations, future consumer persistency behaviors could vary materially from the past. The effect of persistency on profitability varies for different products. For most of our life insurance and deferred annuity products, actual persistency that is lower than our persistency assumptions could have an adverse impact on profitability, especially in the early years of a policy or contract, primarily because we would be required to accelerate the amortization of expenses we deferred in connection with the acquisition of the policy or contract.

For our long term care insurance and universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees, as well as variable annuities with guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, actual persistency that is higher than our persistency assumptions could have a negative impact on profitability. If these policies remain in force longer than we assumed, then we could be required to make greater benefit payments than we had anticipated when we priced or partially reinsured these products. Some of our long term care insurance policies have experienced higher persistency and poorer loss experience than we had assumed, which led us to increase premium rates on certain of these policies.

Because our assumptions regarding persistency experience are inherently uncertain, reserves for future policy benefits and claims may prove to be inadequate if actual persistency experience is different from those assumptions. Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums during the life of the policy or contract, we cannot guarantee that these increases would be sufficient to maintain profitability. Additionally, some of these pricing changes require regulatory


Table of Contents

approval, which may not be forthcoming. Moreover, many of our products do not permit us to increase premiums or limit those increases during the


Table of Contents


life of the policy or contract, while premiums on certain other products (primarily long term care insurance) may not be increased without prior regulatory approval. Significant deviations in experience from pricing expectations regarding persistency could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our products.

We may be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred acquisition costs,DAC, which would increase our expenses and reduce profitability.

Deferred acquisition costs ("DAC")DAC represent the costs of acquiring new business, principally direct sales commissions and other distribution and underwriting costs that have been deferred on the sale of annuity, life and disability income insurance and, to a lesser extent, marketing and promotional expenses for personal auto and home insurance, and distribution expense for certain mutual fund products. For annuity and universal life products, DAC are amortized based on projections of estimated gross profits over amortization periods equal to the approximate life of the business. For other insurance products, DAC are generally amortized as a percentage of premiums over amortization periods equal to the premium-paying period. For certain mutual fund products, we generally amortize DAC over fixed periods on a straight-line basis.basis, adjusted for redemptions.

Our projections underlying the amortization of DAC require the use of certain assumptions, including interest margins, mortality rates, persistency rates, maintenance expense levels and customer asset value growth rates for variable products. We periodically review and, where appropriate, adjust our assumptions. When we change our assumptions, we may be required to accelerate the amortization of DAC or to record a charge to increase benefit reserves.

For more information regarding DAC, see Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis—Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies—Policies — Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducement Costs" and "—"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Recent Accounting Pronouncements."

The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters and catastrophes could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The occurrence of natural disasters and catastrophes, including earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, fires, severe winter weather, explosions, pandemic disease and man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism, insurrections and military actions, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. Such disasters and catastrophes may damage our facilities, preventing our employees and financial advisors from performing their roles or otherwise disturbing our ordinary business operations and by impacting insurance claims, as described below. Such disasters and catastrophes may also impact us indirectly by changing the condition and behaviors of our customers, business counterparties and regulators, as well as by causing declines or volatility in the economic and financial markets.

The effects of natural and man-made disasters and catastrophes on certain of our businesses include but are not limited to the following: a catastrophic loss of life may materially increase the amount of or accelerate the timing in which benefits are paid under our insurance policies; significant property damage may materially increase the amount of claims submitted under our property casualty insurance policies; an increase in claims and any resulting increase in claims reserves caused by a disaster may harm the financial condition of our reinsurers, thereby impacting the cost and availability of reinsurance and the probability of default on reinsurance recoveries; and declines and volatility in the financial markets may decrease the value of our assets under management and administration, which would harm our financial condition and reduce our management fees.

We cannot predict the timing and frequency with which natural and man-made disasters and catastrophes may occur, nor can we predict the impact that changing climate conditions may have on the frequency and severity of natural disasters. As such, we cannot be sure that our actions to identify and mitigate the risks associated with such disasters and catastrophes, including predictive modeling, establishing liabilities for expected claims, acquiring insurance and reinsurance and developing business continuity plans, will be effective.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.

We rely on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and protect our intellectual property. Although we use a broad range of measures to protect our intellectual property rights, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property. We may have to litigate to enforce and protect our copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability, which represents a diversion of resources that may be significant in amount and may not prove successful. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce the protection of our intellectual property assets could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to compete.

We also may be subject to costly litigation in the event that another party alleges our operations or activities infringe upon such other party's intellectual property rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents or other protections that could be infringed by our products, methods, processes or services or could otherwise limit our ability to


Table of Contents

offer certain product features. Any party that holds such a patent could make a claim of infringement against us. We may also be subject to claims by third parties for breach of copyright, trademark, license usage rights, or misappropriation of trade secret rights. Any such claims and any resulting litigation could result in significant liability for damages. If we were found to have infringed or misappropriated a third party patent or other intellectual property rights, we could incur substantial liability, and in some circumstances could be enjoined from providing certain products or services to our customers or utilizing and benefiting from certain methods, processes, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets or licenses, or alternatively could be required to enter into costly licensing arrangements with third parties, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Breaches of security or the perception thatinterference with our technology infrastructure is not secure, could harm our business.

Our business requires the appropriateis reliant upon technology systems and secure utilizationnetworks, including systems and networks managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store information and to conduct many of clientour business activities and transactions with clients, affiliated advisors, vendors and other third parties. We are also subject to certain federal and state regulations that require us to establish and maintain policies and procedures designed to protect sensitive client information. Our operations requireMaintaining the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Security breaches in connection with the deliveryintegrity of our productssystems and networks is critical to the success of our business operations, including the retention of affiliated advisors and clients, and to the protection of our proprietary information and our clients' personal information. Accordingly, any breaches or interference with such systems and networks by third parties or by our advisors or employees may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We have implemented security measures designed to protect against breaches of security and other interference with our systems and networks resulting from attacks by third parties, including hackers, and from employee or advisor error or malfeasance. We also require third party vendors, who in the provision of services including productsto us are provided with or process information pertaining to our business or our clients, to meet certain information security standards. Despite these measures, we cannot assure that our systems and services utilizingnetworks will not be subject to breaches or interference. Any such event may result in operational disruptions as well as unauthorized access to or the Internetdisclosure or loss of our proprietary information or our clients' personal information, which in turn may result in legal claims, regulatory scrutiny and liability, reputational damage, the incurrence of costs to eliminate or mitigate further exposure, the loss of clients or affiliated advisors or other damage to our business. In addition, the trend toward broad consumer and general public notification of such incidents could significantlyexacerbate the harm to our business, financial condition or results of operations. Even if we successfully protect our technology infrastructure and the confidentiality of sensitive data, we could suffer harm to our business and reputation if attempted security breaches are publicized. We cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in our systems, data thefts, physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access, or other developments will not compromise or breach the technology or other security measures protecting the networks and systems used in connection with our products and services.business.

Protection from system interruptions and operating errors is important to our business. If we experience a sustained interruption to our telecommunications or data processing systems, or other failure in operational execution, it could harm our business.

System or network interruptions could delay and disrupt our ability to develop, deliver or maintain our products and services, causing harm to our business and reputation and resulting in loss of customersaffiliated advisors, clients or revenue. Interruptions could be caused by operational failures arising from employee or advisor error or malfeasance, interference by third parties, including hackers, our implementation of new technology, as well from our maintenance of existing technology. Our financial, accounting, data processing or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, adversely affecting our ability to process transactions or provide products and services to our customers.clients. These interruptions can include fires, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters, power losses, equipment failures, failures of internal or vendor software or systems and other events beyond our control. Further, we face the risk of operational failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries that we use to facilitate or are component providers to our securities transactions.transactions and other product manufacturing and distribution activities. These risks are heightened by our deployment in response to both investor interest and evolution in the financial markets of increasingly sophisticated products, such as those which incorporate automatic asset re-allocation, long/short trading strategies or multiple portfolios or funds, and business-driven hedging, compliance and other risk management strategies. Any such failure, termination or constraint could adversely impact our ability to effect transactions, service our clients and manage our exposure to risk.

Risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in identifying or mitigating risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, including employee and financial advisor misconduct.

We have devoted significant resources toward developingto develop our risk management policies and procedures and will continue to do so. Nonetheless, our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. Many of our methods of managing risk and exposures are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. During periods of


Table of Contents

market volatility or due to unforeseen events, the historically derived correlations upon which these methods are based may


Table of Contents


not be valid. As a result, these methods may not accurately predict future exposures accurately, which could be significantly greater than what our models indicate. This could cause us to incur investment losses or cause our hedging and other risk management strategies to be ineffective. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to us, which may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated.

Moreover, we are subject to the risks of errors and misconduct by our employees and affiliated financial advisors, such as fraud, non-compliance with policies, recommending transactions that are not suitable, and improperly using or disclosing confidential information. These risks are difficult to detect in advance and deter, and could harm our business, results of operations or financial condition. We are further subject to the risk of nonperformance or inadequate performance of contractual obligations by third-party vendors of products and services that are used in our businesses. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. Insurance and other traditional risk-shifting tools may be held by or available to us in order to manage certain exposures, but they are subject to terms such as deductibles, coinsurance, limits and policy exclusions, as well as risk of counterparty denial of coverage, default or insolvency.

As a holding company, we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us to pay dividends and to meet our obligations.

We act as a holding company for our insurance and other subsidiaries.subsidiaries, through which substantially all of our operations are conducted. Dividends from our subsidiaries and permitted payments to us under our intercompany arrangements with our subsidiaries are our principal sources of cash to pay shareholder dividends and to meet our other financial obligations. These obligations include our operating expenses and interest and principal on our borrowings. If the cash we receive from our subsidiaries pursuant to dividend payment and intercompany arrangements is insufficient for us to fund any of these obligations, we may be required to raise cash through the incurrence of additional debt, the issuance of additional equity or the sale of assets. If any of this happens, it could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Insurance, banking and securities laws and regulations regulate the ability of many of our subsidiaries (such as our insurance, banking and brokerage subsidiaries and our face-amount certificate company) to pay dividends or make other permitted payments. See Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K—"Regulation"10-K — "Regulation" as well as the information contained in Part II, Item 7 under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis—Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources." In addition to the various regulatory restrictions that constrain our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make other permitted payments to our company, the rating organizations impose various capital requirements on our company and our insurance company subsidiaries in order for us to maintain our ratings and the ratings of our insurance subsidiaries. The value of assets on the company-level balance sheets of our subsidiaries is a significant factor in determining these restrictions and capital requirements. As asset values decline, our and our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make other permitted payments can be reduced. Additionally, the various asset classes held by our subsidiaries, and used in determining required capital levels, are weighted differently or are restricted as to the proportion in which they may be held depending upon their liquidity, credit risk and other factors. Volatility in relative asset values among different asset classes can alter the proportion of our subsidiaries' holdings in those classes, which could increase required capital and constrain our and our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make other permitted payments. The regulatory capital requirements and dividend-paying ability of our subsidiaries may also be affected by a change in the mix of products sold by such subsidiaries. For example, fixed annuities typically require more capital than variable annuities, and an increase in the proportion of fixed annuities sold in relation to variable annuities could increase the regulatory capital requirements of our life insurance subsidiaries. This may reduce the dividends or other permitted payments which could be made from those subsidiaries in the near term without the rating organizations viewing this negatively. Further, the capital requirements imposed upon our subsidiaries may be impacted by heightened regulatory scrutiny and intervention, which could negatively affect our and our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make other permitted payments. Additionally, in the past we have found it necessary to provide support to certain of our subsidiaries in order to maintain adequate capital for regulatory or other purposes and we may provide such support in the future. The provision of such support could adversely affect our excess capital, liquidity, and the dividends or other permitted payments received from our subsidiaries.

The operation of our business in foreign markets and our investments in non-U.S. denominated securities and investment products subjects us to exchange rate and other risks in connection with earnings and income generated overseas.

While we are a U.S.-based company, a portion of our business operations occur outside of the U.S. and some of our investments are not denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, we are exposed to certain foreign currency exchange risks that could reduce U.S. dollar equivalent earnings as well as negatively impact our general account and other proprietary investment portfolios. Appreciation of the U.S. dollar could unfavorably affect net income from foreign operations, the value of non-U.S. dollar denominated investments and investments in foreign subsidiaries. In comparison, depreciation of the


Table of Contents

U.S. dollar could positively affect our net income from foreign operations and the value of non-U.S. dollar denominated investments, though such depreciation could also diminish investor, creditor and rating organizations perceptions of our company compared to peer companies that have a relatively greater proportion of foreign operations or investments.

We may seek to mitigate these risks by employing various hedging strategies including entering into derivative contracts. Currency fluctuations, including the effect of changes in the value of U.S. dollar denominated investments that vary from the amounts ultimately needed to hedge our exposure to changes in the U.S. dollar equivalent of earnings and equity of these operations, may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Changes in U.S. federal income or estate tax law could make some of our products less attractive to clients.

Many of the products we issue or on which our businesses are based (including both insurance products and non-insurance products) enjoy favorable treatment under current U.S. federal income or estate tax law. Changes in U.S. federal income or estate tax law could thus make some of our products less attractive to clients.


Table of Contents


We are subject to tax contingencies that could adversely affect our provision for income taxes.

We are subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states and municipalities and those of the foreign jurisdictions in which we have significant business operations. These tax laws are complex and may be subject to different interpretations. We must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws when determining the provision for income taxes and must also make estimates about when in the future certain items affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be settled with the taxing authority upon examination or audit. In addition, changes to the Internal Revenue Code, administrative rulings or court decisions could increase our provision for income taxes.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

The market price of our shares may fluctuate.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:

changes in expectations concerning our future financial performance and the future performance of the financial services industry in general, including financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts;

differences between our actual financial and operating results and those expected by investors and analysts;

our strategic moves and those of our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures or restructurings;

changes in the regulatory framework of the financial services industry and regulatory action; changes in and

the adoption of accounting standards applicable to our businesses and the financial services industry; and changes in general economic or market conditions.

Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the market value of our common stock.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making them unacceptably expensive to the raider and to encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:

a board of directors that is divided into three classes with staggered terms;

terms, however, in 2010, our shareholders approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation that provides for the annual election of all directors beginning at our 2013 annual meeting of shareholders; elimination of the right of our shareholders to act by written consent;

rules regarding how shareholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at shareholder meetings;

the right of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval; and

limitations on the right of shareholders to remove directors.

Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.

We believe these provisions protect our shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors time to assess any acquisition proposal. They are not intended to make our company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our board of directors determines is not in the best interests of our company and our shareholders.


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.


Table of Contents



Item 2. Properties.

We operate our business from two principal locations, both of which are located in Minneapolis, Minnesota: the Ameriprise Financial Center, an 897,280848,000 square foot building that we lease, and our 903,722885,000 square foot Client Service Center, which


Table we own. Each of Contents


we own.these principal locations meets high environmental standards: The Client Service Center has achieved the U.S. Green Building Council ("USGBC") LEED Gold Certification, and the Ameriprise Financial Center has achieved USGBC LEED Silver Certification. Our lease term for the Ameriprise Financial Center began in November 2000 and is for 20 years, with several options to extend the term. Our aggregate annual rent for the Ameriprise Financial Center is $15 million. Ameriprise Holdings, Inc, our wholly owned subsidiary,Financial, Inc. owns the 170,815171,000 square foot Oak Ridge Conference Center, a training facility and conference center in Chaska, Minnesota, which can also serve as a disaster recovery site, if necessary. We also lease space in an operations center located in Minneapolis, and we occupy space in a second operations center located in Phoenix, Arizona.

Our property and casualty subsidiary, IDS Property Casualty,Ameriprise Auto and Home Insurance, leases approximately 142,000 square feet at its corporate headquarters in DePere, Wisconsin, a suburb of Green Bay. The lease has a ten-year term expiring in 2014 with an option to renew the lease for up to six renewal terms of five years each.

SAI leases its corporate headquarters, containing approximately 88,000 They also lease a 34,000 square feet,foot office space in LaVista, Nebraska, a suburb of Omaha, underPhoenix, Arizona with a lease that runs through January 31, 2018 with renewal options. SAI also maintains data centers and disaster recovery facilitiesterm expiring in Omaha, Nebraska and Kansas City, Missouri.2014.

Threadneedle leases one office facility in London, England and one in Swindon, England. It is the sole tenant of its principal headquartersLondon office, a 60,410 square foot building, under a lease expiring in June 2018. Threadneedle also leases part of a buildingproperty in Frankfurt, Germany, Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Singapore and Australia and rents offices in a number of other European cities, Hong Kong, Singapore and AustraliaDubai to support its global operations.

SeligmanColumbia Management leases its corporate headquartersoffices in Boston containing approximately 156,000 square feet under a lease that expires in 2021 and facilities in New York New York,City containing approximately 100,00090,000 square feet under a lease expiring in 2019. In addition, Seligman also leases approximately 6,500occupies a space of 11,425 square feet in Palo Alto,Menlo Park, California under a least that expires in 2012. It also occupies 35,000 square feet in South Portland, Maine under a lease that expires in 2015.2023, and Columbia Wanger leases 48,000 square feet in Chicago, Illinois under a lease that expires in 2019.

AASIAFSI leases its office facilities,offices containing approximately 320,00084,000 square feet in Detroit, Michigan, under a lease expiring in 2016.

Generally, we lease the premises we occupy in other locations, including the executive and bank offices that we maintain in New York City and branch offices for our employee branded advisors throughout the United States. We believe that the facilities owned or occupied by our company suit our needs and are well maintained.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The companyCompany and its subsidiaries are involved in the normal course of business in legal, regulatory and arbitration proceedings, including class actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its activities as a diversified financial services firm. These include proceedings specific to the companyCompany as well as proceedings generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which it operates. The companyCompany can also be subject to litigation arising out of its general business activities, such as its investments, contracts, leases and employment relationships. Uncertain economic conditions, heightened and heightenedsustained volatility in the financial markets such as those which have been experienced for over the past year,and significant financial reform legislation may increase the likelihood that clients and other persons or regulators may present or threaten legal claims or that regulators increase the scope or frequency of examinations of the companyCompany or the financial services industry generally. Relevant to market conditions since the latter part of 2007, a large client claimed breach of certain contractual investment guidelines. Concurrent with the company continuing to evaluate the client's claims, the parties are discussing the possibility of mediation or arbitration. No date or format has been set for any such proceeding, and the outcome and ultimate impact of this matter remain uncertain at this time.

As with other financial services firms, the level of regulatory activity and inquiry concerning the company'sCompany's businesses remains elevated. From time to time, the companyCompany receives requests for information from, and/or has been subject to examination or claims by, the SEC, FINRA, OTS,the Federal Reserve Bank, the OCC, the FSA, state insurance and securities regulators, state attorneys general and various other domestic or foreign governmental and quasi-governmental authorities on behalf of themselves or clients concerning the company'sCompany's business activities and practices, and the practices of the company'sCompany's financial advisors. Pending matters about whichDuring recent periods, the companyCompany has recently received information requests, include:exams or inquiries regarding certain matters, including: sales and product or service features of, or disclosures pertaining to, the company's mutual funds, annuities, equity and fixed income securities, low priced securities, insurance products, brokerage services, financial plans and other advice offerings; trading practices within the Company's asset management business; supervision of the company'sCompany's financial advisors; supervisory practices in connection with financial advisors' outside business activities; salescompany procedures and information security. The Company is also responding to regulatory audits, market conduct examinations and other inquiries (including inquiries from the states of Minnesota and New York) relating to an industry-wide investigation of unclaimed property and escheatment practices and supervision associated with the sale of fixed and variable annuities; the delivery of financial plans; the suitability of particular trading strategies and data security.procedures. The number of reviews and investigations has increased in recent years with regard to many firms in the financial services industry, including Ameriprise Financial. The companyCompany has cooperated and will continue to cooperate with the applicable regulators regarding their inquiries.

These legal and regulatory proceedings and disputes are subject to uncertainties and, as such, the companyCompany is unable to estimatepredict the possible lossultimate resolution or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief, in addition to further claims, examinations


Table of Contents

or adverse publicity that could have a material adverse effect on the company'sCompany's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.


Table of Contents

Certain legal and regulatory proceedings are described below.

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and was later transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The plaintiffs alleged that they were investors in several of the company'sCompany's mutual funds and they purported to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940.1940 (the '40 Act). The plaintiffs alleged that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services were excessive. Plaintiffs seek an order declaring that defendants have violated the '40 Act and awarding unspecified damages including excessive fees allegedly paid plus interest and other costs. On July 6, 2007, the Courtdistrict court granted the company'sCompany's motion for summary judgment, dismissing all claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs appealed the Court'sdistrict court's decision, and the appellate argument took place on April 17, 2008. The8, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's decision, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Company filed with the United States Supreme Court a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case in light of the Supreme Court's anticipated review of a similar excessive fee case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in this case and remanded it to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. Without any further briefing or argument, on June 4, 2010, the Eighth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 8, 2010, the district court re-entered its July 2007 order granting summary judgment in favor of the Company. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit on January 10, 2011. The Eighth Circuit Court heard oral arguments of the parties on November 17, 2011. The Company is now consideringawaiting the appeal.Court's ruling.

In November 2010, the Company's J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated subsidiary ("Seligman") received a governmental inquiry regarding an industry insider trading investigation, as previously stated by the Company in general media reporting. The Company continues to cooperate fully with that inquiry. Neither the Company nor Seligman has been accused of any wrongdoing, and the government has confirmed that neither the Company nor any of its affiliated entities is a target of its investigation into potential insider trading.

In September 2008, the company commencedOctober 2011, a putative class action lawsuit captionedentitled Roger Krueger, et al. vs. Ameriprise Financial, Services Inc. and Securities America Inc. v. The Reserve Fund et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.Minnesota against the Company, certain of its present or former employees and directors, as well as certain fiduciary committees on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of the Ameriprise Financial 401(k) Plan. The suitalleged class period is from October 1, 2005, to the present. The action alleges that Ameriprise breached fiduciary duties under ERISA by selecting and retaining primarily proprietary mutual funds with allegedly poor performance histories, higher expenses relative to other investment options, and improper fees paid to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries. The action also alleges that the managementCompany breached fiduciary duties under ERISA because it used its affiliate Ameriprise Trust Company as the Plan trustee and record-keeper and improperly reaped profits from the sale of the Reserve Fund made selective disclosuresrecord-keeping business to certain institutional investorsWachovia Bank, N.A. Plaintiffs allege over $20 million in violation of the federal securities lawsdamages. On January 17, 2012, all defendants filed a brief and other documents in breachsupport of their fiduciary duty in connection withmotion to dismiss the Reserve Primary Fund's lowering its net asset value ("NAV")complaint. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on February 7, 2012. An amended briefing and hearing schedule for the motion to $.97 on September 16, 2008. The company and its affiliates had invested $228 million of its own assets and $3.4 billion of client assets in the Reserve Primary Fund. To date, approximately $0.85 per dollar NAV has been paid to investorsdismiss this amended complaint will be set by the Reserve Primary Fund.court.

For several years, the company has been cooperating with the SEC in connection with an inquiry into the company's sales of, and revenue sharing relating to, other companies' real estate investment trust ("REIT") shares. SEC staff has recently notified the company that it is considering recommending that the SEC bring a civil action against the company relating to these issues, and is providing the company with an opportunity to make a submission to the SEC as to why such an action should not be brought. The company will continue to cooperate with the SEC regarding this matter.


Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.Not applicable.


Table of Contents


PART II.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock trades principally on The New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol AMP. As of February 17, 2009,10, 2012, we had approximately 26,20120,549 common shareholders of record. Price and dividend information concerning our common shares may be found in Note 2826 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The informationInformation regarding our equity compensation plans can be found in Part II, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total return for certain indices is set forth under the heading "Performance Graph" contained on page 19 ofprovided in our 20082011 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

We are primarily a holding company and, as a result, our ability to pay dividends in the future will depend on receiving dividends from our subsidiaries. For information regarding our ability to pay dividends, see the information set forth under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis—Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources" contained in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Share Repurchases

The following table presents the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or any "affiliated purchaser" (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2008:2011:

 
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 
Period
 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 Average Price
Paid per Share
 Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs (1)
 Approximate Dollar Value
of Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs (1)
 

October 1 to October 31, 2008

             

Share repurchase program (1)

   $   $1,304,819,604 

Employee transactions (2)

  61,875 $33.69  N/A  N/A 

November 1 to November 30, 2008

             

Share repurchase program (1)

   $   $1,304,819,604 

Employee transactions (2)

  1,260 $19.34  N/A  N/A 

December 1 to December 31, 2008

             

Share repurchase program (1)

   $   $1,304,819,604 

Employee transactions (2)

  1, 098 $18.05  N/A  N/A 

Totals

             
 

Share repurchase program

   $      
 

Employee transactions

  64,233 $33.14  N/A    
            

  64,233         
            


 
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 
Period
 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased

 Average Price
Paid Per Share

 Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs(1)

 Approximate Dollar Value
of Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs(1)

 
  

October 1 to October 31, 2011

             

Share repurchase program(1)

  1,303,667 $42.20  1,303,667 $1,664,100,189 

Employee transactions(2)

  3,865 $39.36  N/A  N/A 

November 1 to November 30, 2011

             

Share repurchase program(1)

  1,507,692 $44.42  1,507,692 $1,597,130,920 

Employee transactions(2)

  556 $46.56  N/A  N/A 

December 1 to December 31, 2011

             

Share repurchase program(1)

  2,650,979 $47.53  2,650,979 $1,471,142,496 

Employee transactions(2)

  321 $45.48  N/A  N/A 

Other transactions(3)

  264,493 $49.64  N/A  N/A 
  

Totals

             

Share repurchase program

  5,462,338 $45.38  5,462,338    

Employee transactions

  4,742 $40.62  N/A    

Other transactions

  264,493 $49.64  N/A    
  

  5,731,573     5,462,338    
  

N/A Not applicable.

(1)
On April 22, 2008,June 15, 2011, we announced that our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors authorized theus to repurchase of up to $1.5$2.0 billion worth of our common stock through April 22, 2010.June 28, 2013. The share repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares, and depending on market conditions and other factors, these purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. Acquisitions under the share repurchase program may be made in the open market, through privately negotiated transactions or block trades or other means. In light of the current market environment, we have temporarily suspended our stock repurchase program. We may resume activity under our stock repurchase program and begin repurchasing shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time without notice. The Company reserves the right to suspend any such repurchases and to resume later repurchasing at any time, and expressly disclaims any obligation to maintain or lift any such suspension.

(2)
Restricted shares withheld pursuant to the terms of awards under the amended and revised Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting and release of restricted shares. The Plan provides that the value of the shares withheld shall be the average of the high and low pricesclosing price of common stock of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. on the date the relevant transaction occurs.

(3)
Shares reacquired for the partial settlement of a total return swap to economically hedge our exposure to equity price risk of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common stock granted as part of our Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan.

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 
Plan Category
 Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column a) — shares
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  15,764,155 (1)$40.79  12,132,808 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  3,700,520 (2)   10,570,221 (3)
         

Total

  19,464,675 $40.79  22,703,029 
         

(1)
Includes 695,934 share units subject to vesting per the terms of the applicable plan which could result in the issuance of common stock. As the terms of these share-based awards do not provide for an exercise price, they have been excluded from the weighted average exercise price in column B.

(2)
Includes 3,700,520 share units subject to vesting per the terms of the applicable plan which could result in the issuance of common stock. As the terms of these share-based awards do not provide for an exercise price, they have been excluded from the weighted average exercise price in column B.

(3)
Includes 6 million shares of common stock issuable under the terms of the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan. As of December 31, 2008, there were no awards granted under this plan.


Item 6.  Consolidated Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial information from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 2007, 2006, 2005 and 20042007 and for the five-year period ended December 31, 2008. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to2011. On April 30, 2010, we acquired the current year's presentation. Forlong-term asset management business of Columbia Management Group. Results presented below include the periods preceding our separation from American Express Company ("American Express"), we prepared our Consolidated Financial Statements as if we had been a stand-alone company. Inresults of this business after the preparationdate of our Consolidated Financial Statements for those periods, we made certain allocations of expenses that our management believed to be a reasonable reflection of costs we would have otherwise incurred as a stand-alone company but were paid by American Express. Accordingly, our Consolidated Financial Statements include various adjustments to amounts in our consolidated financial statements as a subsidiary of American Express.acquisition. The selected financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notesNotes included elsewhere in this report and "Management's Discussion and Analysis.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007(1) 2006(1) 2005(1) 2004(2) 
 
 (in millions, except per share data)
 

Income Statement Data:

                

Net revenues

 $6,970 $8,556 $8,026 $7,390 $6,891 

Expenses

  7,341  7,540  7,229  6,645  5,779 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before accounting change

  (38) 814  631  558  825 

Net income (loss)

  (38) 814  631  574  794 

Earnings Per Share:

                

Income (loss) from continuing operations before accounting change:

                
 

Basic

 $(0.17)$3.45 $2.56 $2.26 $3.35 
 

Diluted

 $(0.17(3)$3.39 $2.54 $2.26 $3.35 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax:

                
 

Basic

 $ $ $ $0.06 $0.16 
 

Diluted

 $ $ $ $0.06 $0.16 

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax:

                
 

Basic

 $ $ $ $ $(0.29)
 

Diluted

 $ $ $ $ $(0.29)

Net income (loss):

                
 

Basic

 $(0.17)$3.45 $2.56 $2.32 $3.22 
 

Diluted

 $(0.17(3)$3.39 $2.54 $2.32 $3.22 

Cash Dividends Paid Per Common Share:

                

Shareholders

 $0.64 $0.56 $0.44 $0.11 $ 

Cash Dividends Paid:

                

Shareholders

 $143 $133 $108 $27 $ 

American Express Company

        53  1,325 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 2008
 2007(1)
 
  
 
 (in millions, except per share data)
 

Income Statement Data:

                

Total net revenues

 $10,192 $9,512 $7,397 $6,433 $8,001 

Total expenses

  8,807  7,878  6,477  6,877  6,982 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 
$

1,030
 
$

1,284
 
$

736
 
$

(100

)

$

813
 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (60) (24) 1  10  (7)
  

Net income (loss)

  970  1,260  737  (90) 806 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106) 163  15  (54) (8)
  

Net income (loss) attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $1,076 $1,097 $722 $(36)$814 
  

Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Common Shareholders:

                

Basic

                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $4.71 $4.36 $2.98 $(0.21)$3.48 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (0.25) (0.10)   0.05  (0.03)
  

Net income (loss)

 $4.46 $4.26 $2.98 $(0.16)$3.45 
  

Diluted

                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $4.61 $4.27 $2.95 $(0.21)$3.42 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (0.24) (0.09)   0.05  (0.03)
  

Net income (loss)

 $4.37 $4.18 $2.95 $(0.16)(2)$3.39 
  

Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share

 
$

1.15
 
$

0.71
 
$

0.68
 
$

0.64
 
$

0.56
 
  


Table of Contents

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004(2) 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Investments

 $27,522 $30,625 $35,504 $39,086 $40,210 

Separate account assets

  44,746  61,974  53,848  41,561  35,901 

Total assets

  95,676  109,230  104,481  93,280  93,260 (4)

Future policy benefits and claims

  29,293  27,446  30,031  32,725  33,249 

Separate account liabilities

  44,746  61,974  53,848  41,561  35,901 

Customer deposits

  8,229  6,206  6,688  6,796  6,962 

Debt

  2,027  2,018  2,244  1,852  403 

Total liabilities

  89,498  101,420  96,556  85,593  86,558 (5)

Shareholders' equity

  6,178  7,810  7,925  7,687  6,702 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 2008
 2007
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance Sheet Data:(3)

                

Investments

 $38,775 $36,755 $36,642 $27,509 $30,478 

Separate account assets

  66,780  68,330  58,129  44,746  61,974 

Total assets before consolidated investment entities

  127,558  124,343  112,687  95,207  108,371 

Future policy benefits and claims

  31,723  30,208  30,886  29,293  27,446 

Separate account liabilities

  66,780  68,330  58,129  44,746  61,974 

Customer deposits

  9,850  8,779  8,554  8,229  6,206 

Long-term debt

  2,393  2,317  1,868  1,963  2,018 

Short-term borrowings

  504  397       

Total liabilities before consolidated investment entities

  117,730  114,205  103,464  89,049  100,808 

Total Ameriprise Financial, Inc. shareholders' equity

  10,255  10,725  9,269  6,174  7,802 
  
(1)
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we recorded non-recurring separation costs as a result of our separation from American Express. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, $236 million ($154 million after-tax), $361 million ($235 million after-tax) and $293 million ($191 million after-tax), respectively, of such costs were incurred. These costs were primarily associated with establishing the Ameriprise Financial brand, separating and reestablishing our technology platforms and advisor and employee retention programs.

(2)
Effective January 1, 2004, we adopted American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts," which resulted in a cumulative effect of accounting change that reduced first quarter 2004 results by $71 million, net of tax.

(3)
Diluted shares used in this calculation represent basic shares due to the net loss. Using actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.

(4)(3)
TotalBalance Sheet data represents assets and liabilities before consolidated investment entities, as of December 31, 2004 include assets of discontinued operations of $5,873 million.

(5)
Total liabilities as of December 31, 2004 include liabilities of discontinued operations of $5,631 million.reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Table of Contents


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the "Forward-Looking Statements," our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes that follow and the "Consolidated Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data" and the "Risk Factors" included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain key termsreclassifications of prior year amounts have been made to conform to the current presentation. References below to "Ameriprise Financial," the "Company," "we," "us," and abbreviations are defined in the Glossary"our" refer to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. exclusively, to our entire family of Selected Terminology.companies, or to one or more of our subsidiaries.

Overview

We are engageda diversified financial services company with $631 billion in providing financial planning, productsassets under management and services that are designed to be utilizedadministration as solutions for our clients' cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection and estate and wealth transfer needs. As of December 31, 2008, we had a network of more than 12,4002011. We serve individual investors' and institutions' financial advisors and registered representatives ("affiliated financial advisors"). In addition to serving clients through our affiliated financial advisors, our asset management, annuity, and auto and home protection products are distributed through third-party advisors and affinity relationships.

We deliver solutions to our clients through an approach focused on building long-term personal relationships between our advisors and clients. We offer financial planning and advice that are responsive to our clients' evolving needs, and helps them achieve their identified financial goals by recommending actions and a range of product "solutions" consisting of investment, annuities, insurance, banking and other financial products that help them attain over time a return or form of protection while accepting what they determine to be an appropriate range and level of risk. The financial product solutions we offer through our affiliated advisors include both our own products and services and products of other companies. Our financial planning and advisory process is designed to provide comprehensive advice, when appropriate, to address our clients' cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection, and estate and wealth transfer needs. We believe that our focus on personal relationships, together with our strengthshold leadership positions in financial planning, wealth management, retirement, asset management, annuities and product development, allows us to better address our clients'insurance, and we maintain a strong operating and financial needs, including the financial needs of our primary target market segment, the mass affluent and affluent, which we define as households with investable assets of more than $100,000. This focus also puts usfoundation.

Ameriprise is in a strong position to capitalize on significant demographic and market trends, which we believe will continue to drive increased demand for our financial planning and other financial services. DeepOur emphasis on deep client-advisor relationships arehas been central to the abilitysuccess of our business model, to succeedincluding through market cycles, including the extreme market conditions of the past few years, and we believe it will help us navigate future market and economic cycles. We continue to strengthen our position as a retail financial services leader as we focus on meeting the financial needs of the mass affluent and affluent, as evidenced by our leadership in financial planning, a client retention percentage rate of 92%, and our status as a top ten ranked firm within core portions of our four main business segments, including the size of our U.S. advisor force, and assets in long-term U.S. mutual funds, variable annuities and variable universal life ("VUL") insurance.

We offer financial planning, products and services designed to be used as solutions for our clients' cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection, and estate and wealth transfer needs. Our model for delivering product solutions is built on long-term, personal relationships between our clients and our financial advisors and registered representatives ("affiliated advisors"). Our focus on personal relationships, together with our discipline in financial planning and strengths in product development and advice, allow us to address the evolving financial and retirement-related needs of our clients, including our primary target market segment, the mass affluent and affluent, which we define as households with investable assets of more than $100,000. The financial product solutions we offer through our affiliated advisors include both our own products and services and the products of other companies. Our affiliated advisor network is the primary channel through which we offer our life insurance and annuity products and services, as well as a range of banking and protection products.

Our affiliated advisors are focused on using a financial planning and advisory process designed to provide comprehensive advice that persistedfocuses on all aspects of our clients' finances. This approach allows us to recommend actions and a broad range of product solutions, including investment, annuity, insurance, banking and other financial products that can help clients attain a return or form of protection over time while accepting what they determine to be an appropriate range and level of risk. We believe our focus on meeting clients' needs through 2008.personal financial planning results in more satisfied clients with deeper, longer lasting relationships with our company and higher retention of our affiliated advisors.

As of December 31, 2011, we had a network of more than 9,700 affiliated advisors. The financial product solutions we offer through our affiliated advisors include both our own products and services and the products of other companies. Our affiliated advisor network is the primary channel through which we offer our life insurance and annuity products and services, as well as a range of banking and protection products. We offer our affiliated advisors training, tools, leadership, marketing programs and other field and centralized support to assist them in delivering advice and product solutions to clients. We believe our comprehensive and client-focused approach not only improves the products and services we provide to their clients, but also allows us to reinvest in enhanced services for clients and increase support for financial advisors.

We have four main operating segments: Advice & Wealth Management, Asset Management, Annuities and Protection, as well as our Corporate & Other segment. Our four main operating segments are aligned with the financial solutions we offer to address our clients' needs. The products and services we provide retail clients and, to a lesser extent, institutional clients, are the primary source of our revenues and net income. Revenues and net income are significantly impactedaffected by investment performance and the total value and composition of assets we manage and administer for our retail and institutional clients as well as the distribution fees we receive from other companies. These factors, in turn, are largely determined by overall investment market performance and the depth and breadth of our individual client relationships.


Table of Contents

Equity market,price, credit market and interest rate fluctuations can have a significant impact on our results of operations, primarily due to the effects they have on the asset management and other asset-based fees we earn, the "spread" income generated on our annuities, banking and deposit products and universal life ("UL") insurance products, the value of deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") and deferred sales inducement costs ("DSIC") assets, associated with variable annuity and variable UL products, the values of liabilities for guaranteed benefits associated with our variable annuities and the values of derivatives held to hedge these benefits. For additional information regarding

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board updated the accounting standards related to the required consolidation of certain variable interest entities ("VIEs"). We adopted the accounting standard effective January 1, 2010 and recorded as a cumulative change in accounting principle an increase to appropriated retained earnings of consolidated investment entities of $473 million and consolidated approximately $5.5 billion of client assets and $5.1 billion of liabilities in VIEs onto our sensitivityConsolidated Balance Sheets that were not previously consolidated. Management views the VIE assets as client assets and the liabilities have recourse only to those assets. While the economics of our business have not changed, the financial statements were impacted. Prior to adoption, we consolidated certain property funds and hedge funds. These entities and the VIEs consolidated as of January 1, 2010, are defined as consolidated investment entities ("CIEs"). Changes in the valuation of the CIE assets and liabilities impact pretax income. The net income (loss) of the CIEs is reflected in net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests. The results of operations of the CIEs are reflected in the Corporate & Other segment. On a consolidated basis, the management fees we earn for the services we provide to the CIEs and the related general and administrative expenses are eliminated and the changes in the assets and liabilities related to the CIEs, primarily debt and underlying syndicated loans, are reflected in net investment income. We continue to include the fees in the management and financial advice fees line within our Asset Management segment.

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; income (loss) from discontinued operations; and the impact of consolidating CIEs, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. Management uses certain of these non-GAAP measures to evaluate our financial performance on a basis comparable to that used by some securities analysts and investors. Also, certain of these non-GAAP measures are taken into consideration, to varying degrees, for purposes of business planning and analysis and for certain compensation-related matters. Throughout our Management's Discussion and Analysis, these non-GAAP measures are referred to as operating measures. While the consolidation of the CIEs impacts our balance sheet and income statement, our exposure to these entities is unchanged and there is no impact to the underlying business results. The CIEs we manage have the following characteristics:

They were formed on behalf of institutional investors to obtain a diversified investment portfolio and were not formed in order to obtain financing for Ameriprise Financial.

Ameriprise Financial receives customary, industry standard management fees for the services it provides to these CIEs and has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize the investors' returns.

Ameriprise Financial does not have any obligation to provide financial support to the CIEs, does not provide any performance guarantees of the CIEs and has no obligation to absorb the investors' losses.

Management excludes the impact of consolidating the CIEs on assets, liabilities, pretax income and equity riskfor setting our financial performance targets and interest rate risk, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

annual incentive award compensation targets.

It is management's priority to increase shareholder value over a multi-year horizon by achieving our on-average, over-time financial targets.

Our financial targets are:

NetOperating total net revenue growth of 6% to 8%,

EarningsOperating earnings per diluted share growth of 12% to 15%, and

ReturnOperating return on equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income of 12% to 15%.

Our netNet revenues increased $680 million, or 7%, to $10.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $7.02011 compared to $9.5 billion a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 19%, fromfor the prior year period. This revenue decline primarily reflects the unprecedented impactsyear. Operating net revenues exclude net realized gains or losses and revenues or losses of the creditCIEs and include the fees we earn from services provided to the CIEs. Operating net revenues increased $933 million, or 10%, to $10.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $9.1 billion for the prior year.

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ameriprise Financial per diluted share increased $0.34, or 8%, to $4.61 for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $4.27 for the prior year. Operating earnings exclude net realized gains or losses; the market events that occurred during the last few weeksimpact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of Septemberhedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; income (loss) from discontinued operations; and the fourth quarterimpact of 2008. The majority ofconsolidating CIEs. Operating earnings per diluted share increased $0.47, or 10%, to $5.00 for the impacts from the credit market events have been reflected in net investment income, which decreased $1.2 billion, or 59%, fromyear ended December 31, 2011 compared to $4.53 for the prior year period. The credit market events and weak equity markets also negatively impacted management and financial advice fees and distribution fees.year.


Table of Contents

Our consolidated net lossReturn on equity from continuing operations excluding accumulated other comprehensive income was 11.5% for the yeartwelve months ended December 31, 20082011 compared to 11.6% for the prior year. Operating return on equity is calculated using operating earnings for the last twelve months in the numerator and the average Ameriprise Financial, Inc. shareholders' equity from continuing operations excluding the impact of consolidating CIEs and accumulated other comprehensive income as of the last day of the trailing four quarters and the current quarter in the denominator. Operating return on equity excluding CIEs and accumulated other comprehensive income was $38 million, a decline13.2% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 compared to 12.9% for the prior year.

On April 30, 2010, we acquired the long-term asset management business of $852 millionColumbia Management Group from Bank of America (the "Columbia Management Acquisition"). The acquisition, the integration of which is expected to be completed in 2012, has enhanced the scale and performance of our consolidated net incomeretail mutual fund and institutional asset management businesses. We incurred pretax non-recurring integration costs related to the Columbia Management Acquisition of $814$95 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Loss per share for the year ended2011. In total, we have incurred $202 million of pretax non-recurring integration costs through December 31, 2008 was $0.17, compared to earnings per diluted share of $3.39 for the prior year period.2011. These costs include system integration costs, proxy and other regulatory filing costs, employee reduction and retention costs, and investment banking, legal and other acquisition costs.

We continue to establish Ameriprise Financial as a financial services leader as we focus on meeting the financial needs of the mass affluent and affluent, as evidenced by our continued leadership in financial planning and our strong corporate foundation. Our franchisee advisor and client retention remain strong at 92% and 94%, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Branded financial plan net cash sales for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased 4% compared to the year-ago period.

Our owned, managed and administered ("OMA") assets declined to $372.1 billion at December 31, 2008, a net decrease of 22% from December 31, 2007, reflecting the 38% decline in the S&P 500 Index from the prior year period, partially offset by the addition of $36.9 billion in assets from the completion of our acquisitions duringDuring the fourth quarter of 2008.

In the fourth quarter of 2008,2011, we completed the all cash acquisitions of H&R Blocksold Securities America Financial Advisors, Inc., subsequently renamed Ameriprise AdvisorCorporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, "Securities America") to Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services, Inc. ("AASI"), J. & W. Seligman & Co., Incorporated ("Seligman")for $150 million in cash and Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. to expand our retail distributionpotential future payments if Securities America reaches certain financial criteria. The results of Securities America have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented and asset management businesses. The cost of the acquisitions was $787 million, which included the purchase price and transaction costs. We recorded therelated assets and liabilities acquired at fair value and allocated the remaining costs to goodwill and intangible assets. Integration charges of $19 million were included in general and administrative expensehave been classified as held for the year ended December 31, 2008.sale.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In addition to our annual impairment evaluation for goodwill as of July 1, we evaluated goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the unprecedented credit and equity market events. We concluded our goodwill was not impaired.

Share Repurchase Program

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we purchased 12.7 million shares and 15.9 million shares, respectively, for an aggregate cost of $614 million and $948 million, respectively. In April 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the expenditure of up to $1.5 billion for the repurchase of our common stock through April 2010. As of December 31, 2008, we had $1.3 billion remaining under this share repurchase authorization. In light of the current market environment, we have temporarily suspended our stock repurchase program. We may resume activity under our stock repurchase program and begin repurchasing shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time without notice. We reserve the right to suspend any such repurchases and to resume later repurchasing at any time, and expressly disclaim any obligation to maintain or lift any such suspension.

Separation from American Express

On February 1, 2005, the American Express Board of Directors announced its intention to pursue the disposition of 100% of its shareholdings in our company (the "Separation") through a tax-free distribution to American Express shareholders. Effective as of the close of business on September 30, 2005, American Express completed the Separation of our company and the distribution of our common shares to American Express shareholders (the "Distribution"). Prior to the Distribution, we had been a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express. Our separation from American Express resulted in specifically identifiable impacts to our 2007 and 2006 consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

We incurred a total of $890 million of non-recurring separation costs as part of our separation from American Express. These costs were primarily associated with establishing the Ameriprise Financial brand, separating and reestablishing our technology platforms and advisor and employee retention programs. Our separation from American Express was completed in 2007.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies that we use affect our Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain of our accounting and reporting policies are critical to an understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition and, in some cases, the application of these policies can be significantly affected by the estimates, judgments and assumptions made by management during the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The accounting and reporting policies we have identified as fundamental to a full understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition are described below. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about our accounting policies.

Valuation of Investments

The most significant component of our investments is our Available-for-Sale securities, which we generally carry at fair value within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of our Available-for-Sale securities at December 31, 20082011 was primarily obtained from third-party pricing sources. We record unrealized securities gains (losses) in accumulated other


Table of Contents


comprehensive income (loss), net of impacts to DAC, DSIC, certain benefit reserves and income tax provision (benefit) and net of adjustments in other asset and liability balances, such as DAC, to reflect the expected impact on their carrying values had the unrealized securities gains (losses) been realized as of the respective balance sheet dates. At December 31, 2008, we had net unrealized pretax losses on Available-for-Sale securities of $1.8 billion.taxes. We recognize gains and losses in results of operations upon disposition of the securities. We also recognize losses in results

Effective January 1, 2009, we early adopted an accounting standard that significantly changed our accounting policy regarding the timing and amount of operations when management determines that a decline in value is other-than-temporary. A write-downother-than-temporary impairments for impairment can be recognized for both credit-related events and for change inAvailable-for-Sale securities. When the fair value dueof an investment is less than its amortized cost, we assess whether or not: (i) we have the intent to changes in interest rates. Oncesell the security (made a decision to sell) or (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is written downmet, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and we must recognize an other-than-temporary impairment for the difference between the investment's amortized cost basis and its fair value through net income, any subsequent recovery in value cannot beearnings. For securities that do not meet the above criteria, and we do not expect to recover a security's amortized cost basis, the security is also considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these securities, we separate the total impairment into the credit loss component and the amount of the loss related to other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss is recognized in net income untilearnings. The amount of the principal is returned. The determination oftotal other-than-temporary impairment requiresrelated to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of impacts to DAC, DSIC, certain benefit reserves and income taxes. For Available-for-Sale securities that have recognized an other-than-temporary impairment through earnings, if through subsequent evaluation there is a sustained increase in the exercisecash flow expected, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income. Subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of judgment regardingAvailable-for-Sale securities are included in other comprehensive income.

For all securities that are considered temporarily impaired, we do not intend to sell these securities (have not made a decision to sell) and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the amountsecurity before recovery of its amortized cost basis. We believe that we will collect all principal and timinginterest due on all investments that have amortized cost in excess of recovery. fair value that are considered only temporarily impaired.

Factors we consider in determining whether declines in the fair value of fixed-maturityfixed maturity securities are other-than-temporary include: 1)(i) the extent to which the market value is below amortized cost; 2) our ability and intent to hold the investment for a sufficient period of time for it to recover to an amount at least equal to its carrying value; 3)(ii) the duration of time in which there has been


Table of Contents

a significant decline in value; 4)(iii) fundamental analysis of the liquidity, business prospects and overall financial condition of the issuer; and 5)(iv) market events that could impact credit ratings, economic and business climate, litigation and government actions, and similar external business factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss component for corporate debt securities considered other-than-temporarily impaired, a best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected discounted at the security's effective interest rate is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. The significant inputs to cash flow projections consider potential debt restructuring terms, projected cash flows available to pay creditors and our position in the debtor's overall capital structure.

For structured investments (e.g., residential mortgage backed securities)securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities and other structured investments), the Companywe also considersconsider factors such as overall deal structure and our position within the structure, quality of underlying collateral, delinquencies and defaults, loss severities, recoveries, prepayments and cumulative loss projections and discounted cash flows in assessing potential other-than-temporary impairmentimpairments of these investments. Based upon these factors, securities that have indicators of potential other-than-temporary impairment are subject to detailed review by management. In response to the market dislocation in the fourth quarter of 2008 and expectations of continued dislocation in 2009, management increased the discount rate, expected loss and severity rates used to value non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and increased the expected default rates for high yield corporate credits. Securities for which declines are considered temporary continue to be carefully monitored by management. As of December 31, 2008, we had $2.1 billion in gross unrealized losses that related to $14.2 billion of Available-for-Sale securities, of which $5.9 billion have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. These investment securities had an overall ratio of 87% of fair value to amortized cost at December 31, 2008. As part of our ongoing monitoring process, management determined that a majority of the gross unrealized losses on these securities were attributable to changes in interest rates and credit spreads across asset classes. Additionally, because we have the ability as well as the intent to hold these securities for a time sufficient to recover our amortized cost, we concluded that none of these securities were other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008.

Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducement Costs

For our annuity and life, disability income and long term care insurance products, our DAC and DSIC balances at any reporting date are supported by projections that show management expects there to be adequate premiums or estimated gross profits after that date to amortize the remaining DAC and DSIC balances. These projections are inherently uncertain because they require management to make assumptions about financial markets, anticipated mortality and morbidity levels and policyholder behavior over periods extending well into the future. Projection periods used for our annuity products are typically 1030 to 25 years, while projection50 years. Projection periods for our life disability incomeinsurance and long term care insurance products are often 50 years or longer.longer and projection periods for our disability income products can be up to 45 years. Management regularly monitors financial market conditions and actual policyholder behavior experience and compares them to its assumptions.

For annuity and universal lifeUL insurance products, the assumptions made in projecting future results and calculating the DAC balance and DAC amortization expense are management's best estimates. Management is required to update these assumptions whenever it appears that, based on actual experience or other evidence, earlier estimates should be revised. When assumptions are changed, the percentage of estimated gross profits used to amortize DAC might also change. A change in the required amortization percentage is applied retrospectively; an increase in amortization percentage will result in a decrease in the DAC balance and an increase in DAC amortization expense, while a decrease in amortization percentage will result in an increase in the DAC balance and a decrease in DAC amortization expense. The impact on results of operations of changing assumptions can be either positive or negative in any particular period and is reflected in the period in which such changes are made. For products with associated DSIC, the same policy applies in calculating the DSIC balance and periodic DSIC amortization.

For other life, disability income and long term care insurance products, the assumptions made in calculating our DAC balance and DAC amortization expense are consistent with those used in determining the liabilities and, therefore, are intended to provide for adverse deviations in experience and are revised only if management concludes experience will be so adverse that DAC are not recoverable. If management concludes that DAC are not recoverable, DAC are reduced to the amount that is recoverable based on best estimate assumptions and there is a corresponding expense recorded in our consolidated resultsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations.

For annuity and life, disability income and long term care insurance products, key assumptions underlying these long-term projections include interest rates (both earning rates on invested assets and rates credited to contractholder and policyholder


Table of Contents


accounts), equity market performance, mortality and morbidity rates and the rates at which policyholders are expected to surrender their contracts, make withdrawals from their contracts and make additional deposits to their contracts. Assumptions about earned and credited interest rates are the primary factors used to project interest margins, while assumptions about equity and bond market performance are the primary factors used to project client asset value growth rates, and assumptions about surrenders, withdrawals and deposits comprise projected persistency rates. Management must also make assumptions to project maintenance expenses associated with servicing our annuity and insurance businesses during the DAC amortization period.

The client asset value growth rates are the rates at which variable annuity and variable universal lifeVUL insurance contract values invested in separate accounts are assumed to appreciate in the future. The rates used vary by equity and fixed income investments. Management reviews and, where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions with respect to client asset value growth rates on a regular basis. The long-term client asset value growth rates are based on assumed gross annual returns of 9% for equity funds and 6% for fixed income funds. We typically use a five-year mean reversion process as a guideline in setting near-term equity assetfund growth rates based on a long-term view of financial market performance as well as recent actual performance. The suggested near- termnear-term equity fund growth rate is reviewed quarterly to ensure consistency with management's assessment of anticipated equity market performance. In


Table of Contents

A decrease of 100 basis points in various rate assumptions is likely to result in an increase in DAC and DSIC amortization and an increase in benefits and claims expense from variable annuity guarantees. The following table presents the fourth quarter of 2008, we decidedestimated impact to constrain near-term equity growth rates below the level suggested by mean reversion. This constraint is based on our analysis of historical equity returns following downturnscurrent period pretax income:

 
 Estimated Impact to
Pretax Income(1)

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Decrease in future near and long-term fixed income returns by 100 basis points

 $(38)

Decrease in future near-term equity fund growth returns by 100 basis points

 
$

(37

)

Decrease in future long-term equity fund growth returns by 100 basis points

  (27)
  

Decrease in future near and long-term equity returns by 100 basis points

 $(64)
  
(1)
An increase in the market. Our long-term client asset value growth rates are based on assumed gross annual returns of 9% for equities and 6.5% for fixed income securities. If we increased or decreased ourabove assumptions related to these growth rates by 100 basis points the impact on the DAC and DSIC balances would beresult in an increase or decrease ofto pretax income for approximately $30 million.

the same amount.

We monitor other principal DAC and DSIC amortization assumptions, such as persistency, mortality, morbidity, interest margin and maintenance expense levels each quarter and, when assessed independently, each could impact our DAC and DSIC balances.

The analysis of DAC and DSIC balances and the corresponding amortization is a dynamic process that considers all relevant factors and assumptions described previously. Unless management identifies a significant deviation over the course of the quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these DAC and DSIC amortization assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year. An assessment of sensitivity associated with changes in any single assumption would not necessarily be an indicator of future results.

We adopted American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") Statement of Position ("SOP") 05-1, "Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts" ("SOP 05-1") on January 1, 2007. See Note 2 and Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the effect of our adoption of SOP 05-1 and our accounting policies for the amortization and capitalization of DAC. In periods prior to 2007, our policy had been to treat certain internal replacement transactions as continuations and to continue amortization of DAC associated with the existing contract against revenues from the new contract. For details regarding the balances of and changes in DAC for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 see Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liabilities for Future Policy Benefits and Policy Claims and Other Policyholders' Funds

Fixed Annuities and Variable Annuity Guarantees

Future policy benefits and policy claims and other policyholders' funds related to fixed annuities and variable annuity guarantees include liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable deferred annuities, guaranteed benefits associated with variable annuities, equity indexed annuities and fixed annuities in a payout status.

Liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable deferred annuities are equal to accumulation values, which are the cumulative gross deposits and credited interest less withdrawals and various charges.

The majority of the variable annuity contracts offered by us contain guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB") provisions. When market values of the customer's accounts decline, the death benefit payable on a contract with a GMDB may exceed the contract accumulation value. The CompanyWe also offersoffer variable annuities with death benefit provisions that gross up the amount payable by a certain percentage of contract earnings which are referred to as gain gross-up benefits. In addition, the Company offerswe offer contracts with guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit ("GMWB") and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit ("GMAB") provisions and, until May 2007, the Companywe offered contracts containing guaranteed minimum income benefit ("GMIB") provisions. As a result of the recent market decline, the amount by which guarantees exceed the accumulation value has increased significantly.

In determining the liabilities for variable annuity death benefits,GMDB, GMIB and the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB, we project these benefits and contract assessments using actuarial models to simulate various equity market scenarios. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC asset valuation for the same contracts. As with DAC, management will review,reviews, and where appropriate, adjustadjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless


Table of Contents


management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management will reviewreviews and updateupdates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year. In response to the market dislocationThe amounts in the fourth quarter of 2008table above in "Deferred Acquisition Costs and expectations of continued dislocation in 2009, management lowered futureDeferred Sales Inducement Costs" include the estimated impact to benefits and claims expense related to variable annuity and variable universal life profit expectations based on continued depreciationguarantees resulting from a decrease of 100 basis points in contract values and historical equity market return patterns.various rate assumptions.

The variable annuity death benefitGMDB liability is determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value and recognizing the excess over the estimated meaningful life based on expected assessments (e.g., mortality and expense fees, contractual administrative charges and similar fees).

If elected by the contract owner and after a stipulated waiting period from contract issuance, a GMIB guarantees a minimum lifetime annuity based on a specified rate of contract accumulation value growth and predetermined annuity purchase rates. The GMIB liability is determined each period by estimating the expected value of annuitization benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value at the date of annuitization and recognizing the excess over the estimated meaningful life based on expected assessments.

The embedded derivatives related to GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions are recorded at fair value. See Note 1814 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the fair value measurement of embedded derivatives. The liability for the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions is


Table of Contents

determined in the same way as the liability for variable annuity death benefits.GMDB liability. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and fees relate to persistency and benefit utilization. As with DAC, management reviews, and where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year. The changes in both the fair values of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives and the liability for life contingent benefits are reflected in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.

Liabilities for equity indexed annuities are equal to the accumulation of host contract values covering guaranteed benefits and the marketfair value of embedded equity options.

Liabilities for fixed annuities in a benefit or payout status are based on future estimated payments using established industry mortality tables and interest rates, ranging from 4.6%4.25% to 9.5% at December 31, 2008,2011, depending on year of issue, with an average rate of approximately 5.8%5.47%.

Life, Disability Income and Long Term Care Insurance

Future policy benefits and policy claims and other policyholders' funds related to life, disability income and long term care insurance include liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable universal life policies, liabilities for indexed accounts of indexed universal life ("IUL") products, liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported claims, estimates of benefits payable on claims incurred but not yet reported and estimates of benefits that will become payable on term life, whole life, disability income and long term care policies as claims are incurred in the future.

Liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable universal life insurance are equal to accumulation values. Accumulation values are the cumulative gross deposits and credited interest less various contractual expense and mortality charges and less amounts withdrawn by policyholders.

Liabilities for indexed accounts of IUL products are equal to the accumulation of host contract values covering guaranteed benefits and the fair value of embedded equity options.

A portion of our fixed and variable universal life contracts have product features that result in profits followed by losses from the insurance component of the contract. These profits followed by losses can be generated by the cost structure of the product or secondary guarantees in the contract. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges.

In determining the liability for contracts with profits followed by losses, we project benefits and contract assessments using actuarial models. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC asset valuation for the same contracts. As with DAC, management reviews, and where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.

The liability for these future losses is determined by estimating the death benefits in excess of account value and recognizing the excess over the estimated meaningful life based on expected assessments (e.g. cost of insurance charges, contractual administrative charges, similar fees and investment margin). See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the liability for contracts with secondary guarantees.

Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported life insurance claims are equal to the death benefits payable under the policies. Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported disability income and long term care claims include any periodic or other benefit amounts due and accrued, along with estimates of the present value of obligations for continuing benefit payments. These amounts are calculated based on claim continuance tables which estimate the likelihood an individual will continue to be eligible for benefits. Present values are calculated at interest rates established when claims are incurred. Anticipated claim continuance rates are based on established industry tables, adjusted as appropriate for the Company'sour experience. Interest rates used with disability income claims ranged from 3.0% to 8.0% at December 31, 2008,2011, with an average rate of 4.8%4.5%. Interest rates used with long term care claims ranged from 4.0% to 7.0% at December 31, 2008,2011, with an average rate of 4.1%4.2%.

Liabilities for estimated benefits payable on claims that have been incurred but not yet reported are based on periodic analysis of the actual time lag between when a claim occurs and when it is reported.

Liabilities for estimates of benefits that will become payable on future claims on term life, whole life, disability income and long term care policies are based on the net level premium method, using anticipated premium payments, mortality and morbidity rates, policy persistency and interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability. Anticipated mortality and morbidity rates are based on established industry mortality and morbidity tables, with modifications based on the Company'sour experience. Anticipated premium payments and persistency rates vary by policy form, issue age, policy duration and certain other pricing factors. Anticipated interest rates for term and whole life ranged from 4.0% to 10.0% at December 31, 2008,2011, depending on policy form, issue year and policy duration. Anticipated interest rates for disability income vary by planpolicies


Table of Contents

ranged from 4.0% to 7.5% at December 31, 2011, depending on policy form, issue year and were 7.5% and 6.0% at policy issue grading to 5.0% over five years and 4.5% over 20 years, respectively.duration. Anticipated discountinterest rates for long term care policy reserves can vary by plan and wereyear and ranged from 5.8% to 9.4% at December 31, 2008 and range from 5.9% to 6.3% over 40 years.2011.

Where applicable, benefit amounts expected to be recoverable from reinsurance companies who share in the risk are separately recorded as reinsurance recoverable within receivables.


Table of Contents

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We use derivative instruments to manage our exposure to various market risks. Examples include index options, interest rate swaps and swaptions, total return swaps, and futures that economically hedge the equity and interest rate exposure of derivatives embedded in certain annuity, life and certificate liabilities, as well as exposure to price risk arising from affiliated mutual fund seed money investments. All derivatives are recorded at fair value. The fair value of our derivative instruments is determined using either market quotes or valuation models that are based upon the net present value of estimated future cash flows and incorporate current market observable inputs to the extent available.

The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and the resulting hedge designation, if any. We primarily use derivatives as economic hedges that are not designated as accounting hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. We occasionally designate derivatives as (1)(i) hedges of changes in the fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments ("fair value hedges"), (2)(ii) hedges of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ("cash flow hedges"), or (3)(iii) hedges of foreign currency exposures of net investments in foreign operations ("net investment hedges in foreign operations").

Our policy is to not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivatives and collateral arrangements executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. For derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as accounting hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in current period earnings. The changes in fair value of derivatives hedging variable annuity living benefits equity indexed annuities and stock market certificatescertain variable annuity death benefits, when applicable, are included within benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses,expenses. The changes in fair value of derivatives hedging equity indexed annuities and IUL products are included within interest credited to fixed accounts and the changes in fair value of derivatives hedging stock market certificates are included within banking and deposit interest expense, respectively.expense. The changes in fair value of derivatives hedging equity price risk of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common stock granted as part of the Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Equity Plan are included in distribution expenses. The changes in fair value of all other derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges are a component of net investment income. Our derivatives primarily provide economic hedges to equity market and interest rate exposures. Examples include structured derivatives, options, futures, equity and interest rate swaps and swaptions that economically hedge the equity and interest rate exposure of derivatives embedded in certain annuity and certificate liabilities, as well as exposure to price risk arising from proprietary mutual fund seed money investments.

For derivative instruments that qualify as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives, as well as changes in the fair value of the corresponding hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments, are recognized on a net basis in current period earnings. The carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted for the change in fair value from the designated hedged risk. If a fair value hedge designation is removed or the hedge is terminated prior to maturity, previous adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged item are recognized into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item.

For derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portionsportion of the gain or loss on the derivative instruments areis reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings when the hedged item or transaction impacts earnings. The amount that is reclassified into earnings is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with the hedged instrument or transaction impact. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported currently in earnings.current period earnings as a component of net investment income. If a hedge designation is removed or a hedge is terminated prior to maturity, the amount previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) may be recognized intois reclassified to earnings over the period that the hedged item impacts earnings. For any hedge relationships that are discontinued because the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur according to the original strategy, any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recognized in earnings immediately.

For derivative instruments that qualify as net investment hedges in foreign operations, the effective portionsportion of the change in fair value of the derivatives areis recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as part of the foreign currency translation adjustment. Any ineffective portionsportion of net investment hedges in foreign operations areis recognized in earningsnet investment income during the period of change.

For further details on the types of derivatives we use and how we account for them, see Note 2 and Note 2015 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Tax Accounting

Income taxes, as reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements, represent the net amount of income taxes that we expect to pay to or receive from various taxing jurisdictions in connection with our operations. We provide for income taxes based on amounts that we believe we will ultimately owe taking into account the recognition and measurement for uncertain tax positions. Inherent in the provision for income taxes are estimates and judgments regarding the tax treatment


Table of Contents

of certain items. In the event that the ultimate tax treatment of items differs from our estimates, we may be required to significantly change the provision for income taxes recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In connection with the provision for income taxes, our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect certain amounts related to deferred tax assets and liabilities, which result from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities measured for financial statement purposes versus the assets and liabilities measured for tax return purposes. Among ourIncluded in deferred tax assets is aare significant deferred tax asset relating to capital losses that have been recognized for financial statement purposes but not yet for tax return purposes as well as future deductible capital losses realized for tax return purposes. Under current U.S. federal income tax law, capital losses generally must be used against capital gain income within five years of the year in which the capital losses are recognized for tax purposes.

Our life insurance subsidiaries will not be able to file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return with the other members of our affiliated group until 2010, which will result in net operating and capital losses, credits and other tax attributes generated by one group not being available to offset income earned or taxes owed by the other group during the period of non-consolidation. This lack of consolidation could affect our ability to fully realize certain of our deferred tax assets, including the capital losses.


Table of Contents

We are required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of our deferred tax assets that management believes will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining if a valuation allowance should be established, and the amount of such allowance if required. Factors used in making this determination include estimates relating to the performance of the business including the ability to generate capital gains. Consideration is given to, among other things in making this determination, a)(i) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, b)(ii) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, c)(iii) taxable income in prior carryback years, and d)(iv) tax planning strategies. It is likely that management willManagement may need to identify and implement appropriate planning strategies to ensure our ability to realize our deferred tax assetassets and avoid the establishment of a valuation allowance with respect to such assets. In the opinion of management,Management believes it is currently more likely than not that we will not realize the full benefit of our deferred tax assets, including our capital loss deferred tax asset;certain state net operating losses, and therefore no sucha valuation allowance of $5 million has been established.established as of December 31, 2011.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on our future consolidated results of operations orand financial condition, see Note 32 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We adopted new accounting rules for the deferral of insurance and annuity acquisition costs on January 1, 2012 on a retrospective basis. The change reduced our DAC asset by $2.0 billion, which decreased retained earnings by $1.4 billion after-tax. The retrospective adoption increased our return on equity from continuing operations excluding accumulated other comprehensive income by 2.4% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The adoption will not impact our strong excess capital position or cash flow. We estimate that the adoption will have a marginal impact to operating earnings in 2012.

Sources of Revenues and Expenses

Management and Financial Advice Fees

Management and financial advice fees relate primarily to fees earned from managing mutual funds, separate account and wrap account assets and institutional investments including structured investments, as well as fees earned from providing financial advice and administrative services (including transfer agent, administration and custodial fees earned from providing services to retail mutual funds). Management and financial advice fees also include mortality and expense risk fees earned on separate account assets.

Our management and risk fees are generally computed as a contractual rate applied to the underlying asset values and are generally accrued daily and collected monthly. ManyA significant portion of our management fees are calculated as a percentage of the fair value of our managed assets. The substantial majority of our managed assets are valued by third party pricing services vendors based upon observable market data. The selection of our third party pricing services vendors and the reliability of their prices are subject to certain governance procedures, such as exception reporting, subsequent transaction testing, and annual due diligence of our vendors, which includes assessing the vendor's valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions.

Several of our mutual funds havehad a performance incentive adjustment ("PIA"). The PIA increasesincreased or decreasesdecreased the level of management fees received based on the specific fund's relative performance as measured against a designated external index. We recognizediscontinued the PIA feeearned by our domestic mutual funds during 2011. We recognized PIA revenue monthly on a 12 month rolling performance basis. We may also receive performance-based incentive fees from hedge funds, Threadneedle Open Ended Investment Companies ("OEICs"), or other structured investments that we manage. The annual performance fees for structured investments are recognized as revenue at the time the performance fee is finalized or no longer subject to adjustment. All other performance fees are based on a full contract year and are final at the end of the contract year. Any performance fees received are not subject to repayment or any other clawback provisions and approximately 1% of managed assets as of December 31, 2011 are subject to "high water marks" whereby we will not earn incentive fees even if the fund has positive returns until it surpasses the previous high water mark. Employee benefit plan and institutional investment management and administration services fees are negotiated and are also generally


Table of Contents

based on underlying asset values. We may receive performance-based incentive fees from structured investments and hedge funds that we manage, which are recognized as revenue at the end of the performance period. Fees from financial planning and advice services are recognized when the financial plan is delivered.

Distribution Fees

Distribution fees primarily include point-of-sale fees (such as mutual fund front-end sales loads) and asset-based fees (such as 12b-1 distribution and shareholder service fees) that are generally based on a contractual percentage of assets and recognized when earned. Distribution fees also include amounts received under marketing support arrangements for sales of mutual funds and other companies' products, such as through our wrap accounts, as well as surrender charges on fixed and variable universal life insurance and annuities.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income primarily includes interest income on fixed maturity securities classified as Available-for-Sale, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans, consumer loans, other investments and cash and cash equivalents; the changes in fair value of trading securities, including seed money,certain derivatives and certain derivatives;assets and liabilities of consolidated investment entities; the pro rata share of net income or loss on equity method investments; and realized gains and losses on the sale of securities and charges for other-than-temporary impairments of investments determinedrelated to be other-than-temporarily impaired.credit losses. Interest income is accrued as earned using the effective interest method, which makes an adjustment of the yield for security premiums and discounts on all performing fixed maturity securities classified as Available-for-Sale excluding structured securities, and commercial mortgage loans so that the related security or loan recognizes a constant rate of return on the outstanding balance throughout its term. For beneficial interests in structured securities, the excess cash flows attributable to a beneficial interest over the initial investment are recognized as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Realized gains and losses on securities, other than trading securities and equity method investments, are recognized using the specific identification method on a trade date basis.


Table of Contents

Premiums

Premiums include premiums on property-casualty insurance, traditional life and health (disability income and long term care) insurance and immediate annuities with a life contingent feature. Premiums on auto and home insurance are net of reinsurance premiums and are recognized ratably over the coverage period. Premiums on traditional life and health insurance are net of reinsurance ceded and are recognized as revenue when due.

Other Revenues

Other revenues include certain charges assessed on fixed and variable universal life insurance and annuities, which consist of cost of insurance charges, net of reinsurance premiums and cost of reinsurance for universal lifeUL insurance products, variable annuity guaranteed benefit rider charges and administration charges against contractholder accounts or balances. Premiums paid by fixed and variable universal life policyholders and annuity contractholders are considered deposits and are not included in revenue. Other revenues also include revenues related to certain consolidated limited partnerships that were consolidated beginning in 2006.partnerships.

Banking and Deposit Interest Expense

Banking and deposit interest expense primarily includes interest expense related to banking deposits and investment certificates. Additionally, banking and deposit interest expense includes interest on non-recourse debt of a structured entity while it was consolidated, as well as interest expense related to non-recourse debt of certain consolidated limited partnerships. The changes in fair value of investmentstock market certificate embedded derivatives and the derivatives hedging stock market certificates are included within banking and deposit interest expense.

Distribution Expenses

Distribution expenses primarily include compensation paid to the Company'sour financial advisors, registered representatives, third-party distributors and wholesalers, net of amounts capitalized and amortized as part of DAC. The amounts capitalized and amortized are based on actual distribution costs. The majority of these costs, such as advisor and wholesaler compensation, vary directly with the level of sales. Distribution expenses also include marketing support and other distribution and administration related payments made to affiliated and unaffiliated distributors of products provided by the Company'sour affiliates. The majority of these expenses vary with the level of sales, or assets held, by these distributors, or are fixed costs.and the remainder is fixed. Distribution expenses also include wholesaling costs.

Interest Credited to Fixed Accounts

Interest credited to fixed accounts represents amounts earned by contractholders and policyholders on fixed account values associated with fixed and variable universal life and annuity contracts. The mark-to-market adjustment onchanges in fair value of equity indexed annuity and IUL embedded derivatives and the derivatives hedging equity indexed annuitiesthese products are included within interest credited to fixed accounts.

Benefits, Claims, Losses and Settlement Expenses

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses consist of amounts paid and changes in liabilities held for anticipated future benefit payments under insurance policies and annuity contracts, along with costs to process and pay such


Table of Contents

amounts. Amounts are net of benefit payments recovered or expected to be recovered under reinsurance contracts. Benefits under variable annuity guarantees include the changechanges in fair value of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives and the derivatives hedging these benefits.benefits, as well as the changes in fair value of derivatives hedging GMDB provisions. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses also include amortization of DSIC.

Amortization of DAC

Direct sales commissions and other costs deferredcapitalized as DAC are amortized over time. For annuity and universal lifeUL contracts, DAC are amortized based on projections of estimated gross profits over amortization periods equal to the approximate life of the business. For other insurance products, DAC are generally amortized as a percentage of premiums over amortization periods equal to the premium-paying period. For certain mutual fund products, DAC are generally amortized over fixed periods on a straight-line basis adjusted for redemptions. See Deferred"Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducement CostsCosts" under Critical"Critical Accounting PoliciesPolicies" for further information on DAC.

Interest and Debt Expense

Interest and debt expense primarily includes interest on corporate debt and debt of consolidated investment entities, the impact of interest rate hedging activities and amortization of debt issuance costs.


Table of Contents

Separation Costs

Separation costs include expenses related to our separation from American Express. These costs were primarily associated with establishing the Ameriprise Financial brand, separating and reestablishing our technology platforms and advisor and employee retention programs. Our separation from American Express was completed in 2007.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense includes compensation, share-based awards and other benefits for employees (other than employees directly related to distribution, including financial advisors), integration costs, professional and consultant fees, information technology, facilities and equipment, advertising and promotion, legal and regulatory minority interest and corporate related expenses. Minority interest is related to certain consolidated limited partnerships, which primarily consist of the portion of net income (loss) of these partnerships not owned by us.

Our SegmentsAssets Under Management and Administration

Our five segments are Advice & Wealth Management, Asset Management, Annuities, Protection and Corporate & Other. See Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our segments.

Owned, Managed and Administered Assets

Owned assets include certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for which we do not provide investment under management services and do not recognize management fees, such as investments in non-proprietary funds held in the separate accounts of our life insurance subsidiaries, as well as restricted and segregated cash and receivables.

Managed assets("AUM") include managed external client assets and managed owned assets. Managed external client assets include client assets for which we provide investment management services, such as the assets of the RiverSource family of mutualColumbia funds and Seligman family of mutualThreadneedle funds, assets of institutional clients and client assets of clients in our affiliated advisor platform held in wrap accounts. Managed external client assets also includeaccounts as well as assets managed by sub-advisorssub-advisers selected by us. Managed external client assets are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Managed owned assets includeAUM also includes certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for which we provide investment management services and recognize management fees in our Asset Management segment, such as the assets of the general account, and RiverSource Variable Product funds held in the separate accounts of our life insurance subsidiaries.subsidiaries and client assets of CIEs. These assets do not include assets under advisement, for which we provide model portfolios but do not have full discretionary investment authority.

Administered assetsAssets under administration ("AUA") include assets for which we provide administrative services such as client assets invested in other companies' products that we offer outside of our wrap accounts. These assets include those held in clients' brokerage accounts. We generally record fees received from administered assets as distribution fees. We do not exercise management discretion over these assets and do not earn a management fee. These assets are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We earn AUA also includes certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for which we do not provide investment management services and do not recognize management fees, on our owned separate account assets based on the market value of assetssuch as investments in non-affiliated funds held in the separate accounts. We record the income associated withaccounts of our owned investments, including net realized gains and losses associated with these investments and other-than-temporary impairments on these investments, as netlife insurance subsidiaries. These assets do not include assets under advisement, for which we provide model portfolios but do not have full discretionary investment income. For managed assets, we receive management fees based on the value of these assets. We generally report these fees as management and financial advice fees. We may also receive distribution fees based on the value of these assets. We generally record fees received from administered assets as distribution fees.

Fluctuations in our owned, managed and administered assets impact our revenues. Our owned, managed and administered assets are impacted by net flows of client assets, market movements and foreign exchange rates. Owned assets are also affected by changes in our capital structure. In 2008, RiverSource managed assets had $12.9 billion in net outflows compared to net outflows of $6.2 billion during 2007 and market depreciation of $28.8 billion in 2008 compared to market appreciation of $5.7 billion in 2007. These negative impacts to RiverSource managed assets were partially offset by a $12.8 billion increase in managed assets due to the acquisition of Seligman in the fourth quarter of 2008. Threadneedle managed assets had $15.8 billion in net outflows in 2008 compared to net outflows of $21.1 billion in 2007 and market depreciation of $19.8 billion in 2008 compared to market appreciation of $7.5 billion in 2007. The negative impact on Threadneedle managed assets due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates was $28.6 billion in 2008 compared to a positive impact of $2.0 billion in 2007. Our wrap accounts had net inflows of $3.7 billion in 2008 compared to net inflows of $11.7 billion in 2007 and market depreciation of $26.8 billion in 2008 and market appreciation of $5.8 billion in 2007. The net decline in wrap account assets was partially offset by a $2.1 billion increase due to the acquisition of H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc. In 2008, RiverSource variable annuities had net inflows of $2.7 billion, but variable annuity contract accumulation values decreased $13.9 billion, net of market-driven declines in separate account asset values. These changes in variable annuities affected both RiverSource managed owned assets and owned assets. Our fixed annuities had total net outflows of $0.7 billion in 2008 compared to net outflows of $2.9 billion in the prior year, which impacted our RiverSource managed owned assets. Administered assets increased $4.5 billion compared to the prior year due to an increase of


Table of Contents


$22.0 billion related to the acquisition of H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2008, partially offset by market depreciation.authority.

The following table presents detail regarding our owned, managedAUM and administered assets:AUA:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in billions, except percentages)
 

Owned Assets

 $31.7 $39.6  (20)%

Managed Assets(1):

          
 

RiverSource

  127.9  156.3  (18)
 

Threadneedle

  74.2  134.4  (45)
 

Wrap account assets

  72.8  93.9  (22)
 

Eliminations(2)

  (10.0) (15.4) (35)
         

Total Managed Assets

  264.9  369.2  (28)

Administered Assets

  75.5  71.0  6 
         

Total Owned, Managed and Administered Assets

 $372.1 $479.8  (22)%
         

(1)
Includes managed external client assets and managed owned assets.

(2)
Includes eliminations for RiverSource mutual fund assets included in
 
 December 31,  
 
 
 2011
 2010
 Change
 
  
 
 (in billions)
  
 

Assets Under Management and Administration

          

Advice & Wealth Management AUM

 $104.7 $97.5  7%

Asset Management AUM

  435.5  456.8  (5)

Eliminations

  (12.6) (12.4) (2)
  

Total Assets Under Management

  527.6  541.9  (3)

Total Assets Under Administration

  103.7  105.6  (2)
  

Total AUM and AUA

 $631.3 $647.5  (3)%
  

Total AUM decreased $14.3 billion, or 3%, to $527.6 billion as of December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year primarily due to Asset Management AUM net outflows, partially offset by wrap account assets and RiverSource assets sub-advised by Threadneedle.net inflows.


Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 20082011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20072010

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; income (loss) from discontinued operations; and the impact of consolidating CIEs, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. See our discussion on the use of these non-GAAP measures in the Overview section above.

The following table presents our consolidated results of operationsoperations:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2011
 2010
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $4,537 $(49)$4,586 $3,784 $(38)$3,822 $764  20%

Distribution fees

  1,573    1,573  1,447    1,447  126  9 

Net investment income

  2,046  97  1,949  2,309  308  2,001  (52) (3)

Premiums

  1,220    1,220  1,179    1,179  41  3 

Other revenues

  863  94  769  863  125  738  31  4 
  

Total revenues

  10,239  142  10,097  9,582  395  9,187  910  10 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  47    47  70    70  (23) (33)
  

Total net revenues

  10,192  142  10,050  9,512  395  9,117  933  10 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  2,497    2,497  2,065    2,065  432  21 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  853    853  909    909  (56) (6)

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,557  67  1,490  1,750  9  1,741  (251) (14)

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  618  (8) 626  127  16  111  515  NM 

Interest and debt expense

  317  221  96  290  181  109  (13) (12)

General and administrative expense

  2,965  116  2,849  2,737  129  2,608  241  9 
  

Total expenses

  8,807  396  8,411  7,878  335  7,543  868  12 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

  1,385  (254) 1,639  1,634  60  1,574  65  4 

Income tax provision

  355  (52) 407  350  (36) 386  21  5 
  

Income from continuing operations

  1,030  (202) 1,232  1,284  96  1,188  44  4 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (60) (60)   (24) (24)      
  

Net income

  970  (262) 1,232  1,260  72  1,188  44  4 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non- controlling interests

  (106) (106)   163  163       
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $1,076 $(156)$1,232 $1,097 $(91)$1,188 $44  4%
  
NM
Not Meaningful. 

(1)
Includes the elimination of management fees we earn for services provided to the years ended December 31, 2008CIEs and 2007.

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $2,899 $3,238 $(339) (10)%
 

Distribution fees

  1,565  1,762  (197) (11)
 

Net investment income

  828  2,018  (1,190) (59)
 

Premiums

  1,091  1,063  28  3 
 

Other revenues

  766  724  42  6 
           
  

Total revenues

  7,149  8,805  (1,656) (19)
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  179  249  (70) (28)
           
  

Total net revenues

  6,970  8,556  (1,586) (19)
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  1,948  2,057  (109) (5)
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  790  847  (57) (7)
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,125  1,179  (54) (5)
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  933  551  382  69 
 

Interest and debt expense

  109  112  (3) (3)
 

Separation costs

    236  (236) NM 
 

General and administrative expense

  2,436  2,558  (122) (5)
           
  

Total expenses

  7,341  7,540  (199) (3)
           

Pretax income (loss)

  (371) 1,016  (1,387) NM 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  (333) 202  (535) NM 
           

Net income (loss)

 $(38)$814 $(852) NM 
           

NM Not Meaningful.

the related expense; revenues and expenses of the CIEs; net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; and income (loss) from discontinued operations. Income tax provision is calculated using the statutory tax rate of 35% on applicable adjustments.

Table of Contents

InThe following table presents the second quarter of 2008, we reclassified the changes in fair value of certain derivatives from net investment income to various expense lines where the changes in fair valuecomponents of the related embedded derivatives reside. The changesadjustments in fair value of derivatives hedgingthe table above:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
 
   
 
 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                   

Management and financial advice fees

 $(49)$ $(49)$(38)$ $(38)

Distribution fees

             

Net investment income

  91  6  97  275  33  308 

Premiums

             

Other revenues

  94    94  125    125 
  

Total revenues

  136  6  142  362  33  395 

Banking and deposit interest expense

             
  

Total net revenues

  136  6  142  362  33  395 
  

Expenses

                   

Distribution expenses

             

Interest credited to fixed accounts

             

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

    67  67    9  9 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

    (8) (8)   16  16 

Interest and debt expense

  221    221  181    181 

General and administrative expense

  21  95  116  18  111  129 
  

Total expenses

  242  154  396  199  136  335 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

  (106) (148) (254) 163  (103) 60 

Income tax provision

    (52) (52)   (36) (36)
  

Income from continuing operations

  (106) (96) (202) 163  (67) 96 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (60) (60)   (24) (24)
  

Net income

  (106) (156) (262) 163  (91) 72 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106)   (106) 163    163 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $ $(156)$(156)$ $(91)$(91)
  
(1)
Other adjustments include net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; and income (loss) from discontinued operations.

The following table presents a reconciliation of operating earnings per diluted share:

 
 Years Ended December 31,
 Per Diluted Share
Years Ended December 31,

 
 
   
 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
 

Income from continuing operations

 $1,030 $1,284       

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106) 163       
  

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ameriprise Financial

  1,136  1,121 $4.61 $4.27 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (60) (24) (0.24) (0.09)
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

  1,076  1,097  4.37  4.18 

Operating adjustments, after-tax

  156  91  0.63  0.35 
  

Operating earnings

 $1,232 $1,188 $5.00 $4.53 
  

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

             

Basic

  241.4  257.4       

Diluted

  246.3  262.3       

Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of operating return on equity indexed annuitiesexcluding CIEs and stockaccumulated other comprehensive income:

 
 Twelve Months Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $1,136 $1,121 

Less: Adjustments(1)

  (96) (67)
  

Operating earnings

 $1,232 $1,188 
  

Total Ameriprise Financial, Inc. shareholders' equity

 $10,470 $10,309 

Less: Assets and liabilities held for sale

  29  102 

Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

  603  540 
  

Total Ameriprise Financial, Inc. shareholders' equity from continuing operations excluding AOCI

  9,838  9,667 

Less: Equity impacts attributable to CIEs

  478  455 
  

Operating equity

 $9,360 $9,212 
  

Return on equity from continuing operations, excluding AOCI

  11.5% 11.6%

Operating return on equity excluding CIEs and AOCI(2)

  13.2% 12.9%
  
(1)
Adjustments reflect the trailing twelve months' sum of after-tax net realized gains or losses; the market certificates were reclassified toimpact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, claims, lossesnet of hedges, DAC and settlement expenses, interest credited to fixed accountsDSIC amortization; and bankingintegration and deposit interest expense, respectively. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform torestructuring charges.

(2)
Operating return on equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income is calculated using the current presentation.

trailing twelve months of earnings excluding the after-tax net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DAC and DSIC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; and discontinued operations in the numerator, and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. shareholders' equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income; the impact of CIEs; and the assets and liabilities held for sale using a five point average of quarter-end equity in the denominator.

Overall

Consolidated net loss for 2008 was $38 million, down $852 million from consolidated netNet income of $814 million for 2007. The loss in 2008 was primarily attributable to negative economic, credit and equity market trends that accelerated inAmeriprise Financial decreased $21 million, or 2%, to $1.1 billion for the third and fourth quarters of 2008. The S&P 500 Indexyear ended 2008 at 903December 31, 2011 compared to 1,468 at$1.1 billion for the endprior year. Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ameriprise Financial increased $15 million, or 1%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.1 billion for the prior year. Loss from discontinued operations, net of 2007, a droptax, of 565 points, or 38%. Credit spreads widened in the fourth quarter of 2008 as reflected in the 114 basis point increase in the Barclays U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Index and the 642 basis point increase in the Barclays High Yield Index. Short-term interest rates declined in the fourth quarter of 2008 as the Fed Funds rate was reduced to 0-25 basis points.

Pretax net realized investment losses on Available-for-Sale securities were $757$60 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, which primarily2011 included a $77 million after-tax charge related to other-than-temporary impairmentspreviously disclosed legal expenses and a $14 million after-tax gain on the sale of various financial services securities, high yield corporate credits and residential mortgage backed securities, compared to pretaxSecurities America. Operating earnings exclude net realized investment gains or losses; the market impact on Available-for-Sale securitiesvariable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; income (loss) of discontinued operations; and the impact of consolidating CIEs. Operating earnings increased $44 million, or 4%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007. In response2011 compared to $1.2 billion for the acceleratedprior year reflecting higher revenues from business growth and an additional four months of Columbia Management results, partially offset by the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models, the market deterioration inimpacts on DAC and DSIC amortization and the fourth quarternegative impact of 2008, management increased the discountlow interest rate expected lossenvironment. The market impact on DAC and severity rates used to value non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and increased the expected default rates for high yield corporate credits, which resulted in $420DSIC amortization was a $17 million in pretax net realized investment losses.

Consolidated net loss for 2008 included $192 million in integration and restructuring charges and support costs related to the RiverSource 2a-7 money market funds and unaffiliated money market funds. Included in consolidated net incomecharge for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $2362011 compared to a $34 million of pretax non-recurring separation costs.

Resultsbenefit for the prior year.

Operating earnings will continue to be negatively impacted by the ongoing low interest rate environment in 2012. In addition to continuing spread compression in our interest sensitive product lines throughout the year, ended December 31, 2008there is also included an increase inthe potential for interest rate related impacts to DAC and DSIC amortization due toand the market dislocation in 2008,level of reserves as well as an increase in GMDB and GMIB benefits due to lower equity markets. These negative impacts were partially offset by a benefit resulting fromresult of our annualongoing review of valuationvarious actuarial related assumptions, for products of RiverSource Life companies in the third quarter of 2008 and our conversion to a new industry standard valuation system that provides enhanced modeling capabilities. The annual review of valuation assumptions resulted in a decrease in expenses resulting primarily from updating mortality and expense assumptions for certain life insurance products and from updating fund mix and contractholder behavior assumptions for variable annuities with guaranteed benefits. The valuation system conversion also resulted in an increase in revenue primarily from improved modeling of the expected value of existing reinsurance agreements and a decrease in expense from modeling annuity amortization periods at the individual policy level. Our annual review of valuation assumptions in the third quarter of 2007 resulted in a net $30 million increase in expense from updating product persistency assumptions, partially offset by decreases in expense from updating other assumptions.which could be material.

The total pretax impacts on our revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 20082011 attributable to the annual review of valuation assumptions for products of RiverSource Life companies, the valuation system conversion and the impact of marketsmodels on DAC and DSIC amortization, variable annuity living benefit riders, net of hedges and GMDB and GMIB benefitsan operating basis were as follows:

Segment Pretax
Benefit (Charge)
 Premiums Other
Revenues
 Distribution
Expenses
 Benefits, Claims, Losses
and Settlement Expenses
 Amortization
of DAC
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Annuities

 $ $ $1 $26 $(330)$(303)

Protection

  2  95    44  (145) (4)
              
 

Total

 $2 $95 $1 $70 $(475)$(307)
              

Segment Pretax Benefit (Charge)
 Other Revenues
 Benefits, Claims, Losses and Settlement Expenses
 Amortization of DAC
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Valuation assumptions and model changes:

             

Annuities

 $ $40 $(65)$(25)

Protection

  (20) 4  2  (14)
  

Total

 $(20)$44 $(63)$(39)
  

Table of Contents

The total pretax impacts on our revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 20072010 attributable to the review of valuation assumptions for products of RiverSource Life companies and the impact of marketsmodels on DAC and DSIC amortization and variable annuity living benefit riders, net of hedgesan operating basis were as follows:

Segment Pretax
Benefit (Charge)
 Premiums Other
Revenues
 Distribution
Expenses
 Benefits, Claims, Losses
and Settlement Expenses
 Amortization
of DAC
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Annuities

 $ $ $ $(38)$27 $(11)

Protection

    (2)   (9) (20) (31)
              
 

Total

 $ $(2)$ $(47)$7 $(42)
              

Segment Pretax Benefit (Charge)
 Other Revenues
 Benefits, Claims,
Losses and
Settlement Expenses

 Amortization
of DAC

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Valuation assumptions and model changes:

             

Annuities

 $ $(256)$353 $97 

Protection

  (20) (44) 22  (42)
  

Total

 $(20)$(300)$375 $55 
  

Net revenuesRevenues

Our decrease inNet revenues increased $680 million, or 7%, to $10.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $9.5 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues is primarily attributableexclude net realized gains or losses and revenues or losses of the CIEs and include the fees we earn from services provided to the declineCIEs. Operating net revenues increased $933 million, or 10%, to $10.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $9.1 billion for the prior year driven by growth in equity marketsasset-based fees from net inflows in wrap account assets, the Columbia Management Acquisition and related credit market events.increased client activity.

Management and financial advice fees decreased $339increased $753 million, or 10%20%, to $2.9$4.5 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $3.2$3.8 billion in 2007. Total client assets as offor the prior year. Operating management and financial advice fees include the fees we earn from services provided to the CIEs. Operating management and financial advice fees increased $764 million, or 20%, to $4.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $241.4 billion2011 compared to $293.9$3.8 billion for the prior year primarily due to an additional four months of business resulting from the Columbia Management Acquisition, as of December 31, 2007, a decrease of $52.5 billion, or 18%.well as higher wrap account fees and variable annuity fees. Wrap account assets decreased $21.1increased $5.9 billion, or 22%6%, to $103.4 billion at December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year due to weak equity markets in 2008, partially offset by inflows and an increase in assets of $2.0 billion related to our acquisition of H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2008. Market depreciation on wrap account assets was $26.8 billion during 2008 compared to market appreciation of $5.8 billion during 2007. Net inflows in wrap accounts decreased to $3.7 billion in 2008 from $11.7 billion in 2007. Total managed assets decreased $104.3net inflows. Average variable annuities contract accumulation values increased $6.4 billion, or 28%12%, primarilyfrom the prior year due to higher average equity market depreciation andlevels, as well as net outflows in RiverSource and Threadneedle funds and a $28.6 billion decrease in Threadneedle managed assets in 2008 due to the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by an increase in assets of $12.8 billion related to our acquisition of Seligman.inflows.

Distribution fees decreased $197increased $126 million, or 11%9%, to $1.6 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.8$1.4 billion in 2007for the prior year primarily due to higher asset-based fees driven by the impact of market depreciation on asset based feesColumbia Management Acquisition and decreased sales volume due to a shiftnet inflows in wrap account assets, as well as increased client behavior away from traditional investment activity.

Net investment income decreased $1.2 billion,$263 million, or 59%11%, to $828$2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.3 billion for the prior year. Net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2011 included a $91 million gain for changes in 2008the assets and liabilities of CIEs, primarily debt and underlying syndicated loans, compared to a $275 million gain in the prior year. Operating net investment income excludes net realized gains or losses and changes in the assets and liabilities of CIEs. Operating net investment income decreased $52 million, or 3%, to $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.0 billion in 2007. Included in net investment income for 2008 were $757 million of net realized investment losses on Available-for-Sale securities,the prior year primarily consisting of other-than-temporary impairments, compared to net realized investment gains on Available-for-Sale securities of $44 million in 2007. Also contributing to the decrease in net investment income was a loss of $88 million on trading securities in 2008 compareddue to a gain of $3 million in 2007 and a $224 million decrease in investment income earned on fixed maturity securities primarily from declining average balancesdriven by lower invested assets and lower interest rates. The decrease in fixed annuities and increased holdings of cash and cash equivalents. Investment income on fixed maturities was $1.6 billion in 2008invested assets compared to $1.8 billionthe prior year resulted from net outflows in 2007.

Premiums increased $28 million, or 3%, to $1.1 billioncertificates driven by the low interest rate environment and lower investments in 2008 primarilyannuity general account assets due to a 6% year-over-year increasethe implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in autothe second quarter of 2010 and home policy counts and a 9% increase in traditional life insurance in force. Traditional life insurance in force increased $6.6 billionlower interest sensitive fixed annuity account balances. These negative impacts were partially offset by $43 million of additional bond discount accretion investment income related to $77.4 billion in 2008 comparedprior periods resulting from revisions to $70.8 billion in 2007.

Other revenues increased $42 million, or 6%, to $766 million in 2008 compared to $724 million in 2007 primarily due to a $95 million benefit from updating valuation assumptions and converting to a new valuation system for productsthe accounting classification of RiverSource Life companiescertain structured securities in the third quarter of 2008. Also,2011.

Premiums increased $41 million, or 3%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.2 billion for the prior year primarily due to growth in Auto and Home premiums driven by higher volumes, as well as higher sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies. Auto and Home policy counts increased 7% period-over-period.

Other revenues remained flat at $863 million for the fourthyear ended December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year. Operating other revenues exclude revenues of the CIEs. Operating other revenues increased $31 million, or 4%, to $769 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $738 million for the prior year due to higher fees from variable annuity guarantees driven by higher in force amounts. During the second quarter of 2008,2011, we extinguished $43reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings a $27 million gain on an interest rate hedge put in place in anticipation of our junior subordinated notes ("junior notes")issuing debt between December 2010 and recognizedJune 2011. Operating other revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 included a gain of $19 million. Other revenues in 2008 included $36 million from the sale of certain operating assets. Other revenues in 2007 included $25 million of additional proceedsbenefit from payments related to the saleReserve Funds matter in the first quarter of our defined contribution recordkeeping business in 2006 and $68 million from unwinding a variable interest entity.2010.

Banking and deposit interest expense decreased $23 million, or 33%, to $47 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $70 million to $179 million in 2008 compared to $249 million in 2007for the prior year primarily due to lower certificate balances, as well as a decrease in crediting rates accrued on certificates.

Expenses

Total expenses decreased $199 million, or 3%, to $7.3 billion in 2008 compared to $7.5 billion in 2007. Included in 2007 total expenses were $236 million of separation costs. Excluding separation costs from 2007, total expenses increased $37 million, or 1%, compared to the prior year period. A $382 million increase in amortization of DAC was partially offset by decreases in all other expense lines.certificate products.


Table of Contents

DistributionExpenses

Total expenses decreased $109increased $929 million, or 5%12%, to $1.9$8.8 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.1$7.9 billion in 2007 primarily due tofor the impact of lower cash sales on advisor compensation as reflected by a decrease in net revenues per advisor from $315,000 in 2007 to $267,000 in 2008 and a $104.3 billion decrease in total managed assets.

Interest credited to fixed accounts decreased $57 million, or 7%, to $790 million in 2008 compared to $847 million in 2007 primarily driven by declining fixed annuity balances. The balances had been decreasing steadily throughout 2008 until the fourth quarter when we experienced positive flows into fixed annuities.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlementprior year. Operating expenses decreased $54 million, or 5%, to $1.1 billion in 2008 compared to $1.2 billion in 2007. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2008 included a $90 million benefit from updating valuation assumptions and converting to a new valuation system in the third quarter of 2008 and a $92 million benefit related toexclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges. Partially offsetting these benefits was a $42hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; and expenses of the CIEs. Operating expenses increased $868 million, expense relatedor 12%, to $8.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $7.5 billion for the prior year primarily due to the market'simpact of updating valuation assumptions and models, the market impact on DAC and DSIC a $70 million expense related to the equity market's impact on variable annuity minimum death and income benefitsamortization, and increases in life, long term caredistribution expenses and autogeneral and home insurance benefits. administrative expense.

Distribution expenses increased $432 million, or 21%, to $2.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.1 billion for the prior year as a result of the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well as higher advisor compensation from business growth.

Interest credited to fixed accounts decreased $56 million, or 6%, to $853 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $909 million for the prior year driven by lower average variable annuities fixed sub-account balances and a lower average crediting rate on interest sensitive fixed annuities, as well as lower average fixed annuity account balances. Average variable annuities fixed sub-account balances decreased $580 million, or 11%, to $4.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year primarily due to the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in the second quarter of 2010. The average fixed annuity crediting rate excluding capitalized interest decreased to 3.7% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 3.8% for the prior year. Average fixed annuities contract accumulation values decreased $265 million, or 2%, to $14.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year due to outflows.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2007 included $12decreased $193 million, of expense relatedor 11%, to updating valuation assumptions, $39 million of expense related$1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.8 billion for the unfavorableprior year. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, which exclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges and DSIC amortization, decreased $251 million, or 14%, to $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.7 billion for the prior year. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 included a benefit of $44 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to an immaterialexpense of $300 million in the prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to our Auto and Home business increased from the prior year primarily due to $45 million of catastrophe losses in 2011 compared to $29 million in 2010, as well as higher auto liability reserves. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to our immediate annuities with life contingencies increased from the prior year due to an unfavorable change in reserves primarily driven by higher premiums. In addition, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased as a result of higher UL claims and an increase in ongoing reserve levels for UL products with secondary guarantees compared to the prior year. The market impact on DSIC.to DSIC was an expense of $2 million in 2011 compared to a benefit of $3 million in the prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses for the prior year included a $21 million expense, net of DSIC, as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program.

Amortization of DAC increased $382$491 million or 69%, to $933$618 million in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $551$127 million in 2007. Amortizationfor the prior year. Operating amortization of DAC, which excludes the DAC offset to the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, increased $515 million to $626 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $111 million for the prior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models, as well as the market impact on amortization of DAC. Operating amortization of DAC in 20082011 included a $292an expense of $63 million expense from the market's impact on DAC, an $82 million expense from updating valuation assumptions and conversionmodels compared to a new valuation systembenefit of $375 million in the third quarterprior year. The market impact on amortization of 2008 andDAC was an expense of $15 million in 2011 compared to a $101benefit of $31 million expense related to higher estimated gross profits to amortizein the prior year. Amortization of DAC for the year ended December 31, 2010 included a benefit of $19 million as a result of the reserve decrease, netimplementation of hedges,changes to the Portfolio Navigator program.

Interest and debt expense increased $27 million, or 9%, to $317 million for variable annuity guaranteed living benefits. The market impactthe year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $290 million for the prior year. Operating interest and debt expense, which excludes interest expense on DAC included $220CIE debt, decreased $13 million, resulting from management's actionor 12%, to $96 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $109 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 to lower future profit expectations based on continued depreciation in contract values and historical equity market return patterns. In the prior year DAC amortization included expense of $16 million relatedprimarily due to updating valuation assumptions and benefits of $6 million from the market's impact on DAC and $17 million related to the DAC effect of variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges.

Separation costs in 2007 were primarily associated with separating and reestablishing our technology platforms. All separation costs were incurred as of December 31, 2007.lower average debt balances.

General and administrative expense decreased $122increased $228 million, or 5%8%, to $2.4$3.0 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.7 billion for the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense excludes integration and restructuring charges and expenses of the CIEs. Integration and restructuring charges decreased $16 million to $95 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $111 million for the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense increased $241 million, or 9%, to $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.6 billion in 2007 as a result of expense management initiatives and lower compensation-related expenses primarily from lower Threadneedle hedge fund performance fees. General and administrative expense in 2008 included a $77 million expense related to changes in fair value of Lehman Brothers securities that we purchased from various 2a-7 money market mutual funds managed by RiverSource Investments, a $36 million expense for the costprior year primarily reflecting an additional four months of guaranteeing specific client holdings in an unaffiliated money market mutual fund, a $19 millionongoing expenses from the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well as higher compensation expense related to acquisition integration and $60 million in restructuring charges. General and administrative expense in 2007 included expenses related to professional and consultant fees representing increased spending on investment initiatives, increased hedge fund performance compensation and an increase in technology related costs.advertising and investment spending compared to the prior year.


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate increasedon income from continuing operations including income attributable to 89.7%noncontrolling interests was 25.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, compared to 19.9%21.5% for the prior year. Our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations excluding income attributable to noncontrolling interests was 23.8% for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Our operating effective tax rate was 24.8% for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due2011, compared to a pretax loss in relation to a net tax benefit24.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008 comparedprior year.

It is possible there will be corporate tax reform in the next few years. While impossible to pretaxpredict, corporate tax reform is likely to include a reduction in the corporate tax rate coupled with reductions in tax preferred items. Potential tax reform may also affect the U.S. tax rules regarding international operations. Any changes could have a material impact on our income for the year ended December 31, 2007. Ourtax expense and deferred tax balances.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our operating effective tax rate for December 31, 2008 included $79 million in tax benefits related to changes in the status of current audits and closed audits, tax planning initiatives, and the finalization of prior year tax returns. Our effective tax rate for December 31, 2007 included a $16 million tax benefit related to the finalization of certain income tax audits and a $19 million tax benefit related to our plan to begin repatriating earnings of certain Threadneedle entities through dividends.rate:

On September 25, 2007, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2007-61 in which it announced that it intends to issue regulations with respect to certain computational aspects of the Dividends Received Deduction ("DRD") related to separate account assets held in connection with variable contracts of life insurance companies. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended a revenue ruling issued in August 2007 that purported to change accepted industry and IRS interpretations of the statutes governing these computational questions. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other members of the public will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing and substance of any such regulations are unknown at this time, but they may result in the elimination of some or all of the separate account DRD tax benefit that the Company receives. Management believes that it is likely that any such regulations would apply prospectively only.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
 
   
 
 GAAP
 Operating
 GAAP
 Operating
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

 $1,385 $1,639 $1,634 $1,574 

Less: Pretax income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106)   163   
  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision excluding CIEs

 $1,491 $1,639 $1,471 $1,574 
  

Income tax provision from continuing operations

 $355 $407 $350 $386 

Effective tax rate

  25.6% 24.8% 21.5% 24.5%

Effective tax rate excluding noncontrolling interests

  23.8% 24.8% 23.8% 24.5%

Table of Contents


Results of Operations by Segment

Year Ended December 31, 20082011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20072010

The following tables presenttable presents summary financial information by segmentsegment:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
 
   
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Advice & Wealth Management

                   

Net revenues

 $3,708 $(5)$3,713 $3,343 $1 $3,342 

Expenses

  3,307    3,307  3,027  7  3,020 
  

Pretax income

 $401 $(5)$406 $316 $(6)$322 
  

Asset Management

                   

Net revenues

 $2,900 $3 $2,897 $2,368 $3 $2,365 

Expenses

  2,464  95  2,369  2,050  95  1,955 
  

Pretax income

 $436 $(92)$528 $318 $(92)$410 
  

Annuities

                   

Net revenues

 $2,631 $1 $2,630 $2,500 $9 $2,491 

Expenses

  2,110  59  2,051  1,852  25  1,827 
  

Pretax income

 $521 $(58)$579 $648 $(16)$664 
  

Protection

                   

Net revenues

 $2,072 $3 $2,069 $2,047 $1 $2,046 

Expenses

  1,702    1,702  1,644    1,644 
  

Pretax income

 $370 $3 $367 $403 $1 $402 
  

Corporate & Other

                   

Net revenues

 $192 $189 $3 $423 $419 $4 

Expenses

  535  291  244  474  246  228 
  

Pretax loss

  (343) (102) (241) (51) 173  (224)

Less: Pretax income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106) (106)   163  163   
  

Pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $(237)$4 $(241)$(214)$10 $(224)
  

Eliminations

                   

Net revenues

 $(1,311)$(49)$(1,262)$(1,169)$(38)$(1,131)

Expenses

  (1,311) (49) (1,262) (1,169) (38) (1,131)
  

Pretax income

 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  
(1)
Includes the elimination of management fees we earn for services provided to the CIEs and reconciliation to consolidated totals derived from Note 26 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2008related expense; revenues and 2007:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 Percent Share
of Total
 2007 Percent Share
of Total
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Total net revenues

             
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $3,121  45 %$3,813  45 %
 

Asset Management

  1,289  18  1,762  21 
 

Annuities

  1,618  23  2,206  26 
 

Protection

  1,997  29  1,985  23 
 

Corporate & Other

  (1)   24   
 

Eliminations

  (1,054) (15) (1,234) (15)
          
  

Total net revenues

 $6,970  100 %$8,556  100 %
          

Total expenses

             
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $3,270  44 %$3,528  47 %
 

Asset Management

  1,212  17  1,455  19 
 

Annuities

  1,905  26  1,783  23 
 

Protection

  1,645  22  1,500  20 
 

Corporate & Other

  363  5  508  7 
 

Eliminations

  (1,054) (14) (1,234) (16)
          
  

Total expenses

 $7,341  100 %$7,540  100 %
          

Pretax income (loss)

             
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $(149) 40 %$285  28 %
 

Asset Management

  77  (21) 307  30 
 

Annuities

  (287) 77  423  42 
 

Protection

  352  (94) 485  48 
 

Corporate & Other

  (364) 98  (484) (48)
          
  

Pretax income (loss)

 $(371) 100 %$1,016  100 %
          

expenses of the CIEs; net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; and integration and restructuring charges.

Table of Contents

Advice & Wealth Management

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planning and advice, as well as full service brokerage and banking services, primarily to retail clients through our financialaffiliated advisors. Our affiliated advisors utilizehave access to a diversified selection of both proprietaryaffiliated and non-proprietarynon-affiliated products to help clients meet their financial needs. A significant portion of revenues in this segment is fee-based, driven by the level of client assets, which is impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. We also earn net investment income on invested assets primarily from certificate and banking products. This segment earns revenues (distribution fees) for distributing non-affiliated products and earns intersegment revenues (distribution fees) for distributing our affiliated products and services to our retail clients. Intersegment expenses for this segment include expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment.

In addition to purchases of affiliated and non-affiliated mutual funds and other securities on a stand-alone basis, clients may purchase mutual funds, among other securities, in connection with investment advisory fee-based "wrap account" programs or services, and pay fees based on a percentage of their assets.


Table of Contents

The following table presents the changes in wrap account assets for the years ended December 31:

 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Beginning balance

 $97.5 $81.3 

Net flows

  7.3  7.6 

Market appreciation (depreciation) and other

  (1.4) 8.6 
  

Ending balance

 $103.4 $97.5 
  

Wrap account assets increased $5.9 billion, or 6%, to $103.4 billion compared to the prior year due to net inflows.

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses and integration and restructuring charges for our Advice & Wealth Management segment, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. See our discussion on the use of these non-GAAP measures in the Overview section above.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Advice & Wealth Management segment for the years ended December 31, 2008segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
  
 2011
  
  
 2010
  
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,590 $ $1,590 $1,370 $ $1,370 $220  16%

Distribution fees

  1,849    1,849  1,696    1,696  153  9 

Net investment income

  256  (5) 261  273  1  272  (11) (4)

Other revenues

  61    61  71    71  (10) (14)
  

Total revenues

  3,756  (5) 3,761  3,410  1  3,409  352  10 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  48    48  67    67  (19) (28)
  

Total net revenues

  3,708  (5) 3,713  3,343  1  3,342  371  11 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  2,203    2,203  1,954    1,954  249  13 

General and administrative expense

  1,104    1,104  1,073  7  1,066  38  4 
  

Total expenses

  3,307    3,307  3,027  7  3,020  287  10 
  

Pretax income

 $401 $(5)$406 $316 $(6)$322 $84  26%
  
(1)
Adjustments include net realized gains or losses and 2007:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,339 $1,350 $(11) (1)%
 

Distribution fees

  1,912  2,218  (306) (14)
 

Net investment income

  (32) 399  (431) NM 
 

Other revenues

  80  76  4  5 
           
  

Total revenues

  3,299  4,043  (744) (18)
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  178  230  (52) (23)
           
  

Total net revenues

  3,121  3,813  (692) (18)
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  2,114  2,349  (235) (10)
 

General and administrative expense

  1,156  1,179  (23) (2)
           
  

Total expenses

  3,270  3,528  (258) (7)
           

Pretax income (loss)

 $(149)$285 $(434) NM 
           

NM Not Meaningful.

integration and restructuring charges.

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment pretax loss was $149income increased $85 million, in 2008or 27%, to $401 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $316 million for the prior year. Our Advice & Wealth Management segment pretax operating income, of $285which excludes net realized gains or losses and integration and restructuring charges, increased $84 million, in 2007.or 26%, to $406 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $322 million for the prior year due to improved advisor productivity and new client flows. Pretax margin was 10.8% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 9.5% for the prior year. Pretax operating margin was 10.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 9.6% for the prior year.

Net revenuesRevenues

Net revenues were $3.1increased $365 million, or 11%, to $3.7 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $3.8$3.3 billion in 2007, a decrease of $692for the prior year. Operating net revenues exclude net realized gains or losses. Operating net revenues increased $371 million, or 18%11%, primarilyto $3.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $3.3 billion for the prior year driven by decreaseshigher management and distribution fees from growth in net investment income from realized investment lossesassets under management and lower distribution fees.increased client activity.

Management and financial advice fees decreased $11increased $220 million, or 1%16%, to $1.3$1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.4 billion for the prior year driven by growth in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a $21.1 billion decline in total wrapassets under management. Wrap account assets as a result of the deterioration in the equity markets, as well as lower net inflowsincreased $5.9 billion, or 6%, to $103.4 billion compared to the prior year period, partially offset by a $2.0 billion increase in wrap account assets relateddue to our acquisition of H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc. Net inflows in wrap accounts decreased to $3.7 billion in 2008 from net inflows of $11.7 billion in 2007.inflows.

Distribution fees decreased $306increased $153 million, or 14%9%, from $2.2to $1.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.7 billion for the prior year primarily driven by growth in 2007 to $1.9 billion in 2008 primarily due to market depreciationassets under management and decreased sales volume due to a shift inincreased client behavior away from traditional investment activity.


Table of Contents

Net investment income decreased $431$17 million, from $399or 6%, to $256 million in 2007for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $273 million for the prior year. Operating net investment income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, decreased $11 million, or 4%, to $261 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $272 million for the prior year due to a loss of $32 milliondecrease in 2008, primarily due to net realized investment losses of $333 millionincome on Available-for-Sale securities in 2008, primarily from other-than-temporary impairments. Investment income from fixed maturity securities driven by lower invested assets resulting from net outflows in certificates driven by the low interest rate environment, partially offset by higher banking invested asset balances and other investments decreased $99$6 million primarily dueof additional bond discount accretion investment income related to lower yields on our investment portfolio as we increased our liquidity position.prior periods resulting from revisions to the accounting classification of certain structured securities in the third quarter of 2011.

Banking and deposit interest expense decreased $52$19 million, or 23%28%, to $178$48 million in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $230$67 million in 2007. This decrease isfor the prior year primarily due to lower certificate balances, as well as a decrease in crediting rates accrued on certificates.certificate products.

Expenses

Total expenses decreased $258increased $280 million, or 7%9%, from $3.5 billion in 2007 to $3.3 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $3.0 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude integration and restructuring charges, increased $287 million, or 10%, to $3.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $3.0 billion for the prior year primarily due to a $235 million decreasean increase in distribution expenses.

Distribution expenses resulting fromincreased $249 million, or 13%, to $2.2 billion for the impact of lower asset levels and cash sales onyear ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year primarily due to higher advisor compensation as reflected by a decrease in net revenues per advisor from $315,000 in 2007 to $267,000 in 2008. business growth.

General and administrative expense decreased $23increased $31 million, or 2%3%, fromto $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.1 billion for the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense, which excludes integration and restructuring charges, increased $38 million, or 4%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.1 billion for the prior year period primarily due to an increase in investment spending, including costs associated with our expense reduction initiatives in 2008, partially offset by acquisition integration costs.


new brokerage platform.

Table of Contents

Asset Management

Our Asset Management segment provides investment advice and investment products to retail and institutional clients. We provide our products and services on a global scale through two complementary asset management businesses: Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("Columbia" or "Columbia Management") and Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings Sàrl ("Threadneedle"). Columbia Management predominantly provides U.S. domestic products and services and Threadneedle predominantly provides international investment products and services. We provide clients with Columbia retail products through unaffiliated third party financial institutions and through our Advice & Wealth Management segment. We provide institutional products and services through our institutional sales force. We provide Threadneedle retail products primarily through third parties. Retail products include mutual funds and variable product funds underlying insurance and annuity separate accounts. Institutional asset management services are designed to meet specific client objectives and may involve a range of products including those that focus on traditional asset classes, separately managed accounts, individually managed accounts, collateralized loan obligations, hedge funds, collective funds and property funds. Revenues in this segment are primarily earned as fees based on managed asset balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. In addition to the products and services provided to third party clients, management teams serving our Asset Management segment provide all intercompany asset management services. The fees for such services are reflected within the Asset Management segment results through intersegment transfer pricing. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by our Advice & Wealth Management, Annuities and Protection segments.

On April 30, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the long-term asset management business of the Columbia Management Group from Bank of America. The acquisition significantly enhanced the capabilities of the Asset Management segment by increasing its scale, broadening its retail and institutional distribution capabilities and strengthening and diversifying its lineup of retail and institutional products. The integration of the Columbia Management business, which is expected to be completed in 2012, has involved organizational changes to our portfolio management and analytical teams and to our operational, compliance, sales and marketing support staffs. This integration has also involved the streamlining of our U.S. domestic product offerings. As a result of the integration, we combined RiverSource Investments, our legacy U.S. asset management business, with Columbia Management, under the Columbia brand. Total U.S. retail assets and number of funds under the Columbia brand as of December 31, 2011 were $204.8 billion and 205 funds, respectively.

Threadneedle remains our primary international investment management platform. Threadneedle manages seven OEICs and one Societe d'Investissement A Capital Variable ("SICAV") offering. The seven OEICs are Threadneedle Investment Funds ICVC ("TIF"), Threadneedle Specialist Investment Funds ICVC ("TSIF"), Threadneedle Focus Investment Funds ("TFIF"), Threadneedle Advantage Portfolio Funds ("TPAF"), Threadneedle Investment Funds ICVC II ("TIF II"), Threadneedle Investment Funds ICVC III ("TIF III") and Threadneedle Investment Funds ICVC IV ("TIF IV"). TIF, TSIF, TFIF, TPAF, TIF II, TIF


Table of Contents

III and TIF IV are structured as umbrella companies with a total of 72 (33, 14, 2, 2, 6, 9, and 6, respectively) sub funds covering the world's bond and equity markets. The SICAV is the Threadneedle (Lux) SICAV ("T(Lux)"). T(Lux) is structured as an umbrella company with a total of 30 sub funds covering the world's bond, commodities and equity markets. In addition, Threadneedle manages 13 unit trusts, 10 of which invest into the OEICs, 7 property unit trusts and 1 property fund of funds.

The following tables present the mutual fund performance of our retail Columbia and Threadneedle funds as of December 31, 2011:

Columbia

Mutual Fund Rankings in top 2 Lipper Quartiles

Domestic Equity

Equal weighted1 year37%

3 year48%

5 year61%

Asset weighted1 year38%

3 year39%

5 year58%

International Equity

Equal weighted

1 year


61

%

3 year65%

5 year50%

Asset weighted1 year71%

3 year77%

5 year65%

Taxable Fixed Income

Equal weighted

1 year


85

%

3 year55%

5 year68%

Asset weighted1 year93%

3 year64%

5 year73%

Tax Exempt Fixed Income

Equal weighted

1 year


95

%

3 year85%

5 year95%

Asset weighted1 year85%

3 year84%

5 year99%

Asset Allocation Funds

Equal weighted

1 year


86

%

3 year48%

5 year57%

Asset weighted1 year85%

3 year79%

5 year88%

Number of funds with 4 or 5 Morningstar star ratings

Overall


52

3 year46

5 year49

Percent of funds with 4 or 5 Morningstar star ratings

Overall


44

%

3 year39%

5 year44%

Percent of assets with 4 or 5 Morningstar star ratings

Overall


59

%

3 year40%

5 year42%

Mutual fund performance rankings are based on the performance of Class Z fund shares for Columbia branded mutual funds. In instances where a fund's Class Z shares do not have a full one, three or five year track record, performance for an older share class of the same fund, typically Class A shares, is utilized for the period before Class Z shares were launched. No adjustments to the historical track records are made to account for differences in fund expenses between share classes of a fund.

Equal Weighted Rankings in Top 2 Quartiles: Counts the number of funds with above median ranking divided by the total number of funds. Asset size is not a factor.

Asset Weighted Rankings in Top 2 Quartiles: Sums the total assets of the funds with above median ranking (using Class Z and appended Class Z) divided by total assets of all funds. Funds with more assets will receive a greater share of the total percentage above or below median.

Aggregated data includes all Columbia branded mutual funds.


Table of Contents

Threadneedle

Retail Fund Rankings in Top 2 Morningstar Quartiles or Above Index Benchmark

Equity

Equal weighted1 year65%

3 year72%

5 year86%

Asset weighted1 year68%

3 year76%

5 year86%

Fixed Income

Equal weighted

1 year


69

%

3 year77%

5 year82%

Asset weighted1 year69%

3 year75%

5 year97%

Allocation (Managed) Funds

Equal weighted

1 year


33

%

3 year67%

5 year100%

Asset weighted1 year14%

3 year49%

5 year100%

The performance of each fund is measured on a consistent basis against the most appropriate benchmark — a peer group of similar funds or an index.

Equal weighted: Counts the number of funds with above median ranking (if measured against peer group) or above index performance (if measured against an index) divided by the total number of funds. Asset size is not a factor.

Asset weighted: Sums the assets of the funds with above median ranking (if measured against peer group) or above index performance (if measured against an index) divided by the total sum of assets in the funds. Funds with more assets will receive a greater share of the total percentage above or below median or index.

Aggregated Allocation (Managed) Funds include funds that invest in other funds of the Threadneedle range including those funds that invest in both equity and fixed income.

Aggregated Threadneedle data includes funds on the Threadneedle platform sub-advised by Columbia as well as advisors not affiliated with Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

The following tables present the changes in Columbia and Threadneedle managed assets:

 
 January 1,
2011

 Net Flows
 Market
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
& Other(1)

 Foreign
Exchange

 December 31,
2011

 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Columbia Managed Assets:

                

Retail Funds

 $218.5 $(3.1)$(10.6)$ $204.8 

Institutional Funds

  127.2  (9.8) (4.1)(2)   113.3 

Alternative Funds

  10.0  (1.8) (0.1)   8.1 

Less: Eliminations

  (0.2)   0.1    (0.1)
  

Total Columbia Managed Assets

  355.5  (14.7) (14.7)   326.1 

Threadneedle Managed Assets:

                

Retail Funds

  33.4  0.8  (2.2) (0.2) 31.8 

Institutional Funds

  70.9  10.0  0.1  (0.4) 80.6 

Alternative Funds

  1.3  (0.2) 0.1    1.2 
  

Total Threadneedle Managed Assets

  105.6  10.6  (2.0) (0.6) 113.6 

Less: Sub-Advised Eliminations

  (4.3) (0.8) 0.9    (4.2)
  

Total Managed Assets

 $456.8 $(4.9)$(15.8)$(0.6)$435.5 
  

Table of Contents


 
 January 1,
2010

 Net Flows
 Market
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
& Other(1)

 Foreign
Exchange

 December 31,
2010

 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Columbia Managed Assets:(3)

                

Retail Funds

 $76.9 $(5.2)$146.8(4)$ $218.5 

Institutional Funds

  62.3  (7.1) 72.0(5)   127.2 

Alternative Funds

  9.9    0.1    10.0 

Less: Eliminations

  (0.1)   (0.1)   (0.2)
  

Total Columbia Managed Assets

  149.0  (12.3) 218.8    355.5 

Threadneedle Managed Assets:

                

Retail Funds

  29.1  1.9  3.5  (1.1) 33.4 

Institutional Funds

  66.8  (2.2) 8.7  (2.4) 70.9 

Alternative Funds

  1.9  (0.2) (0.4)   1.3 
  

Total Threadneedle Managed Assets

  97.8  (0.5) 11.8  (3.5) 105.6 

Less: Sub-Advised Eliminations

  (3.6) (0.1) (0.6)   (4.3)
  

Total Managed Assets

 $243.2 $(12.9)$230.0 $(3.5)$456.8 
  
(1)
Distributions of Retail Funds are included in market appreciation/(depreciation) and other.

(2)
Included in Market appreciation/(depreciation) and other is ($4.7) billion due to the transfer of assets from Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs) to United Management Accounts (UMAs).

(3)
Prior to the Columbia Management Acquisition, the domestic managed assets of our Asset Management segment, which are now included in Columbia Managed Assets, were managed by RiverSource Investments.

(4)
Included in Market appreciation/(depreciation) and other is $118.1 billion due to the Columbia Management Acquisition, including $3 billion of assets that were transferred to RiverSource Sub-advised through the implementation of the Portfolio Navigator program, and an additional $13.1 billion of Portfolio Navigator related assets sub-advised by others.

(5)
Included in Market appreciation/(depreciation) and other is $68.4 billion due to the Columbia Management Acquisition.

Total segment assets under management declined $21.3 billion, or 5%, from a year ago to $435.5 billion as of December 31, 2011, driven by a decrease in Columbia managed assets, partially offset by an increase in Threadneedle managed assets. Columbia managed assets declined $29.4 billion, or 8%, from a year ago to $326.1 billion as of December 31, 2011, primarily due to net outflows, as well as market depreciation and other, including a $4.7 billion decrease due to a former parent related program sponsor that shifted assets from a traditional separately managed account platform to a model-delivery only unified managed account platform that utilizes Columbia models. While the assets are excluded from managed assets, the movement in assets was neutral to earnings. Columbia net outflows of $14.7 billion in 2011 included $9.0 billion of outflows of low basis point, former parent company assets. Threadneedle managed assets increased $8.0 billion, or 8%, from a year ago to $113.6 billion as of December 31, 2011 due to net inflows. Threadneedle net inflows of $10.6 billion in 2011 reflected approximately $14 billion from a strategic relationship with Liverpool Victoria to manage its insurance and pension fund portfolio.

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses and integration charges for our Asset Management segment, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. See our discussion on the use of these non-GAAP measures in the Overview section above.


Table of Contents

The following table presents the results of operations of our Asset Management segment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,077 $1,362 $(285) (21)%
 

Distribution fees

  247  322  (75) (23)
 

Net investment income

  (13) 48  (61) NM 
 

Other revenues

  (15) 50  (65) NM 
           
  

Total revenues

  1,296  1,782  (486) (27)
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  7  20  (13) (65)
           
  

Total net revenues

  1,289  1,762  (473) (27)
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  417  464  (47) (10)
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  24  33  (9) (27)
 

General and administrative expense

  771  958  (187) (20)
           
  

Total expenses

  1,212  1,455  (243) (17)
           

Pretax income

 $77 $307 $(230) (75)%
           

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2011
 2010
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $2,434 $ $2,434 $1,979 $ $1,979 $455  23%

Distribution fees

  450    450  358    358  92  26 

Net investment income

  14  3  11  17  3  14  (3) (21)

Other revenues

  5    5  15    15  (10) (67)
  

Total revenues

  2,903  3  2,900  2,369  3  2,366  534  23 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  3    3  1    1  2  NM 
  

Total net revenues

  2,900  3  2,897  2,368  3  2,365  532  22 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  1,026    1,026  734    734  292  40 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  19    19  20    20  (1) (5)

General and administrative expense

  1,419  95  1,324  1,296  95  1,201  123  10 
  

Total expenses

  2,464  95  2,369  2,050  95  1,955  414  21 
  

Pretax income

 $436 $(92)$528 $318 $(92)$410 $118  29%
  

NM Not Meaningful.

(1)
Adjustments include net realized gains or losses and integration charges.

Our Asset Management segment pretax income was $77 million in 2008, down $230increased $118 million, or 75%37%, from $307to $436 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $318 million for the prior year. Our Asset Management segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses and integration charges, increased $118 million, or 29%, to $528 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $410 million for the prior year. Earnings in 2007.2011 reflected twelve months of Columbia Management earnings compared to eight months in the prior year, which impacted revenues and expenses. Pretax margin was 15.0% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 13.4% for the prior year. Pretax operating margin was 18.2% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 17.3% for the prior year.

Net revenuesRevenues

Net revenues decreased $473increased $532 million, or 27%22%, in 2008 to $1.3$2.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.4 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues, of $1.8which exclude net realized gains or losses, increased $532 million, or 22%, to $2.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.4 billion for the prior year driven by an increase in 2007.management and distribution fees.

Management and financial advice fees decreased $285increased $455 million, or 23%, to $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year due to an additional four months of business resulting from the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well the impact of higher average equity market levels on assets, partially offset by net outflows and lower hedge fund performance fees.

Distribution fees increased $92 million, or 26%, to $450 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $358 million for the prior year driven by an additional four months of business resulting from the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well the impact of higher average equity market levels on assets, partially offset by net outflows.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $414 million, or 20%, to $2.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.1 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude integration charges, increased $414 million, or 21%, to $1.1$2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year due to an increase in distribution expenses and general and administrative expense.

Distribution expenses increased $292 million, or 40%, to $1.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $734 million for the prior year due to an additional four months of business resulting from the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well the impact of higher average equity market levels on assets, partially offset by net outflows.

General and administrative expense increased $123 million, or 9%, to $1.4 billion in 2007 primarily due to a decrease in total managed assets excluding wrap account assets of $83.2 billion during 2008, negative market impacts and lower Threadneedle hedge fund performance fees. RiverSource managed assets were $127.9 billion in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $156.3$1.3 billion in 2007. The decrease in RiverSource managed assets of $28.4 billion was due to market depreciation of $28.8 billionfor the prior year. Integration charges remained flat at $95 million for both 2011 and net outflows of $12.9 billion, partially offset by a $12.8 billion increase in managed assets due to the acquisition of Seligman in the fourth quarter of 2008. Threadneedle managed assets were $74.2 billion in 2008 compared to $134.4 billion in 2007. The decrease in Threadneedle managed assets of $60.2 billion was due to a decrease of $28.6 billion related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, net outflows of $15.8 billion and market depreciation of $19.8 billion.

Distribution fees decreased $75 million, or 23%, to $247 million in 2008 compared to $322 million in 2007 primarily due to decreased mutual fund sales volume and lower 12b-1 fees driven by flows and negative market impacts.

Net investment income decreased $61 million from $48 million in 2007 to a net investment loss of $13 million in 2008 primarily due to losses related to changes in fair value of seed money investments driven by the declining market, as well as the deconsolidation of a collateralized debt obligation ("CDO") in the fourth quarter of 2007, which is offset in banking and deposit interest expense.

Other revenues decreased $65 million from $50 million in 2007 to a loss of $15 million in 2008 primarily due to decreases in revenue related to certain consolidated limited partnerships, which had a corresponding decrease in expense. Other revenues in 2008 included $36 million from the sale of certain operating assets. Other revenues in 2007 included $25 million of additional proceeds related to the sale of our defined contribution recordkeeping business in 2006, as well as an $8 million gain from the sale of certain Threadneedle limited partnerships.2010.


Table of Contents

Expenses

Total expenses decreased $243 million, or 17%, primarily due to a $187 million decrease inOperating general and administrative expense. The primary driversexpense, which excludes integration charges, increased $123 million, or 10%, to $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.2 billion for the prior year reflecting an additional four months of this decline were a decrease inongoing expenses relatedof Columbia Management, as well as higher investment spending compared to certain consolidated limited partnerships, which corresponds with the decline in other revenues discussed above and a decline resulting from expense management initiatives andprior year, partially offset by lower incentive compensation accruals. Distribution expenses decreased $47 million related to decreased mutualhedge fund sales volume.performance compensation.

Annuities

Our Annuities segment provides variable and fixed annuity products of RiverSource Life companies to retail clients. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2010, we provided our retail clients primarilyvariable annuity products through our affiliated advisors as well as unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we discontinued new sales of our variable annuities in non-Ameriprise channels to further strengthen the risk and return characteristics of the business. We provide our fixed annuity products through affiliated advisors as well as unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution. Revenues for our variable annuity products are primarily earned as fees based on underlying account balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. Revenues for our fixed annuity products are primarily earned as net investment income on invested assets supporting fixed account balances, with profitability significantly impacted by the spread between net investment income earned and interest credited on the fixed account balances. We also earn net investment income on invested assets supporting reserves for immediate annuities and for certain guaranteed benefits offered with variable annuities and on capital supporting the business. Intersegment revenues for this segment reflect fees paid by the Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSource Variable Series Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust I and Wanger Advisors Trust funds under the variable annuity contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by the Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment.

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses and to the retail clientsmarket impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution.hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization, for our Annuities segment, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. See our discussion on the use of these non-GAAP measures in the Overview section above.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Annuities segment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $478 $510 $(32) (6)%
 

Distribution fees

  275  267  8  3 
 

Net investment income

  652  1,196  (544) (45)
 

Premiums

  85  95  (10) (11)
 

Other revenues

  128  138  (10) (7)
           
  

Total revenues

  1,618  2,206  (588) (27)
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

         
           
  

Total net revenues

  1,618  2,206  (588) (27)
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  207  194  13  7 
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  646  706  (60) (8)
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  269  329  (60) (18)
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  576  318  258  81 
 

General and administrative expense

  207  236  (29) (12)
           
  

Total expenses

  1,905  1,783  122  7 
           

Pretax income (loss)

 $(287)$423 $(710) NM 
           

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2011
 2010
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $622 $ $622 $546 $ $546 $76  14%

Distribution fees

  312    312  284    284  28  10 

Net investment income

  1,280  1  1,279  1,318  9  1,309  (30) (2)

Premiums

  161    161  150    150  11  7 

Other revenues

  256    256  202    202  54  27 
  

Total revenues

  2,631  1  2,630  2,500  9  2,491  139  6 

Banking and deposit interest expense

                 
  

Total net revenues

  2,631  1  2,630  2,500  9  2,491  139  6 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  315    315  268    268  47  18 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  711    711  762    762  (51) (7)

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  472  67  405  691  9  682  (277) (41)

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  398  (8) 406  (76) 16  (92) 498  NM 

Interest and debt expense

  1    1  2    2  (1) (50)

General and administrative expense

  213    213  205    205  8  4 
  

Total expenses

  2,110  59  2,051  1,852  25  1,827  224  12 
  

Pretax income

 $521 $(58)$579 $648 $(16)$664 $(85) (13)%
  

NM Not Meaningful.

Our Annuities segment pretax loss was $287 million in 2008, down $710 million from pretax income of $423 million in 2007.

Net revenues

Net revenues decreased $588 million to $1.6 billion in 2008, compared to $2.2 billion in 2007, primarily driven by a $544 million decrease in net investment income.

Management and financial advice fees decreased $32 million to $478 million driven by lower net flows and market declines. Variable annuities had net inflows of $2.7 billion in 2008 compared to net inflows of $4.9 billion in 2007.

Net investment income decreased $544 million, or 45%, to $652 million in 2008 compared to $1.2 billion in 2007 primarily due to

(1)
Adjustments include net realized investment losses on Available-for-Sale securities of $350 million, which primarily consisted of other-than-temporary impairments, compared to net realized investment gains of $33 million in 2007. Also contributing to lower net investment income were lower yields on our investment portfolio as we increased our liquidity position. Investment income on fixed maturity securities decreased $159 million to $985 million compared to investment income of $1.1 billion in 2007.

Premiums declined $10 million to $85 million in 2008 primarily due to lower sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies. Other revenues decreased $10 million to $128 million in 2008 primarily due to a gain of $49 million in 2007 related to the


Table of Contents


deconsolidation of a CDO, partially offset by an increase in our guaranteed benefit rider fees on variable annuities driven by volume increases in 2008.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $122 million, or 7%, to $1.9 billion in 2008, primarily due to an increase in amortization of DAC partially offset by decreases in interest credited to fixed accounts, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses and general and administrative expense.

Distribution expenses increased $13 million to $207 million in 2008 primarily due to capitalizing less deferrals due to a product mix shift, and therefore expensing more costs.

Interest credited to fixed accounts decreased $60 million, or 8%, to $646 million in 2008 primarily driven by declining fixed annuity balances, which were $12.2 billion as of December 31, 2008 compared to $12.5 billion as of December 31, 2007. The balances had been decreasing steadily throughout 2008 until the fourth quarter when we experienced positive flows into fixed annuities.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses decreased $60 million, or 18%, to $269 million in 2008 compared to $329 million in 2007. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2008 included a $46 million benefit from updating valuation assumptions and converting to a new valuation system in the third quarter of 2008 and a benefit of $92 million related to the unfavorable market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, partially offset by an expense of $42 million related to the market's impact on DSIC and a $70DAC amortization.

Our Annuities segment pretax income decreased $127 million, expense relatedor 20%, to $521 million for the equity market'syear ended December 31, 2011 compared to $648 million for the prior year. Our Annuities segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses and the market impact on variable annuity minimum deathguaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization, decreased $85 million, or 13%, to $579 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to


Table of Contents

$664 million for the prior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models and the market impact on DAC and DSIC amortization.

Net Revenues

Net revenues increased $131 million, or 5%, to $2.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.5 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues, which exclude net realized gains or losses, increased $139 million, or 6%, to $2.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.5 billion for the prior year reflecting higher fee revenue from increased variable annuity separate account balances and higher fees from variable annuity guarantees.

Management and financial advice fees increased $76 million, or 14%, to $622 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $546 million for the prior year due to higher fees on variable annuities driven by higher separate account balances. Average variable annuities contract accumulation values increased $6.4 billion, or 12%, from the prior year due to higher average equity market levels, as well as net inflows. Variable annuity net inflows for the year ended December 31, 2011 included $1.6 billion of net inflows in the Ameriprise channel, partially offset by net outflows from the closed book of variable annuities sold through third-party channels.

Distribution fees increased $28 million, or 10%, to $312 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $284 million for the prior year primarily due to higher fees on variable annuities driven by higher average separate account balances.

Net investment income benefits. Expensesdecreased $38 million, or 3%, to $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.3 billion for the prior year. Operating net investment income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, decreased $30 million, or 2%, to $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.3 billion for the prior year due to a decrease in investment income on fixed maturity securities reflecting lower invested assets and lower interest rates, partially offset by $37 million of additional bond discount accretion investment income related to prior periods resulting from revisions to the accounting classification of certain structured securities in the third quarter of 2011. The decrease in invested assets was driven by lower general account assets due to the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in fair valuethe second quarter of 2010 and lower interest sensitive fixed annuity account balances.

Premiums increased $11 million, or 7%, to $161 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $150 million for the prior year due to higher sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies.

Other revenues increased $54 million, or 27%, to $256 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $202 million for the prior year due to higher fees from variable annuity guarantees driven by higher in force amounts.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $258 million, or 14%, to $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.9 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefit riders,benefits, net of hedges, were comprisedDSIC and DAC amortization, increased $224 million, or 12%, to $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.8 billion for the prior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models and the market impact on DAC and DSIC amortization.

Distribution expenses increased $47 million, or 18%, to $315 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $268 million for the prior year primarily due to higher variable annuity compensation due to increased sales.

Interest credited to fixed accounts decreased $51 million, or 7%, to $711 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $762 million for the prior year driven by lower average variable annuities fixed sub-account balances and a $1.6lower average crediting rate on interest sensitive fixed annuities, as well as lower average fixed annuity account balances. Average variable annuities fixed sub-account balances decreased $580 million, or 11%, to $4.8 billion increasefor the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year primarily due to the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in hedge assets partially offset by a $1.5the second quarter of 2010. The average fixed annuity crediting rate excluding capitalized interest decreased to 3.7% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 3.8% for the prior year. Average fixed annuities contract accumulation values decreased $265 million, or 2%, to $14.3 billion increasefor the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year due to outflows. Fixed annuities remained in reserves. Priornet outflows due to low client demand given current interest rates.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses decreased $219 million, or 32%, to $472 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $691 million for the prior year. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, included $36 million related towhich exclude the unfavorable market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges and $2DSIC amortization, decreased $277 million, or 41%, to $405 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $682 million for the prior year. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2011 included a benefit of $40 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to an immaterial market impact on DSIC.

Amortizationexpense of DAC increased $258 million, or 81%, to $576$256 million in 2008 primarily duethe prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to the market and the effect on DAC amortizationour immediate annuities with life contingencies increased from hedged variable annuity products. In response to the accelerated market deterioration in the fourth quarter of 2008, management took action in the fourth quarter of 2008 to lower future variable annuity profit expectations based on continued depreciation in contract values and historical equity market return patterns.

General and administrative expense decreased $29 million, or 12%, to $207 million in 2008 compared to $236 million in 2007 primarily due to expense control initiatives.


Table of Contents

the prior year due to an unfavorable change in reserves primarily driven by higher premiums. The market impact to DSIC was an expense of $2 million in 2011 compared to a benefit of $3 million in the prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses for the prior year included a $21 million expense, net of DSIC, as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program.

Amortization of DAC increased $474 million to $398 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to a benefit of $76 million for the prior year. Operating amortization of DAC, which excludes the DAC offset to the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, increased $498 million to $406 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to a benefit of $92 million for the prior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models, as well as the market impact on amortization of DAC. Operating amortization of DAC in 2011 included an expense of $65 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to a benefit of $353 million in the prior year. The market impact on amortization of DAC was an expense of $13 million in 2011 compared to a benefit of $21 million in the prior year. Amortization of DAC in 2010 included a benefit of $13 million as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program.

Protection

Our Protection segment offers a variety of protection products to address the identified protection and risk management needs of our retail clients including life, disability income and property-casualty insurance. Life and disability income products are primarily provided through affiliated advisors. Our property-casualty products are provided direct, primarily through affinity relationships. We issue insurance policies through our life insurance subsidiaries and the property casualty companies. The primary sources of revenues for this segment are premiums, fees, and charges we receive to assume insurance-related risk. We earn net investment income on invested assets supporting insurance reserves and capital supporting the business. We also receive fees based on the level of assets supporting VUL separate account balances. This segment earns intersegment revenues from fees paid by the Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSource Variable Series Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust I and Wanger Advisors Trust funds under the VUL contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by the Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment.

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses for our Protection segment, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. See our discussion on the use of these non-GAAP measures in the Overview section above.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Protection segment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $56 $68 $(12) (18)%
 

Distribution fees

  106  102  4  4 
 

Net investment income

  252  361  (109) (30)
 

Premiums

  1,037  1,002  35  3 
 

Other revenues

  547  453  94  21 
           
  

Total revenues

  1,998  1,986  12  1 
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  1  1     
           
  

Total net revenues

  1,997  1,985  12  1 
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  61  62  (1) (2)
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  144  141  3  2 
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  856  850  6  1 
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  333  200  133  67 
 

General and administrative expense

  251  247  4  2 
           
  

Total expenses

  1,645  1,500  145  10 
           

Pretax income

 $352 $485 $(133) (27)%
           

Our Protection segment pretax income was $352 million for 2008, down $133 million, or 27%, from $485 million in 2007.

Net revenues

Net revenues increased $12 million, or 1%, from the prior year period.

Management and financial advice fees decreased $12 million, or 18%, to $56 million primarily driven by lower equity markets.

Net investment income decreased $109 million, or 30%, to $252 million in 2008 compared to $361 million in 2007 primarily due to

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2011
 2010
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $56 $ $56 $54 $ $54 $2  4%

Distribution fees

  95    95  96    96  (1) (1)

Net investment income

  429  3  426  429  1  428  (2)  

Premiums

  1,076    1,076  1,047    1,047  29  3 

Other revenues

  417    417  422    422  (5) (1)
  

Total revenues

  2,073  3  2,070  2,048  1  2,047  23  1 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  1    1  1    1     
  

Total net revenues

  2,072  3  2,069  2,047  1  2,046  23  1 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  32    32  32    32     

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  142    142  147    147  (5) (3)

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,085    1,085  1,059    1,059  26  2 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  201    201  183    183  18  10 

General and administrative expense

  242    242  223    223  19  9 
  

Total expenses

  1,702    1,702  1,644    1,644  58  4 
  

Pretax income

 $370 $3 $367 $403 $1 $402 $(35) (9)%
  
(1)
Adjustments include net realized investment losses on Available-for-Sale securities of $92 million in 2008, primarily due to other-than-temporary impairments, compared to net realized investment gains of $7 million in 2007. Also contributing to lower net investment income were lower yields on our investment portfolio as we increased our liquidity position. Investment income on fixed maturity securities decreased $18 million to $307 million compared to investment income of $325 million in 2007.

Premiums increased $35 million, or 3%, from the prior year period, primarily due to a 6% increase in Auto and Home policy counts and an increase of 9% in traditional life insurance in force. Traditional life insurance in force was $77.4 billion as of year-end 2008, compared to $70.8 billion as of year-end 2007.

Other revenues increased $94 million, or 21%, to $547 million in 2008 primarily due to a $95 million benefit from updating valuation assumptions and converting to a new valuation system in the third quarter of 2008.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $145 million, or 10%, to $1.6 billion for 2008 compared to $1.5 billion for 2007, primarily due to a $133 million increase in amortization of DAC. DAC amortization in 2008 included a $90 million expense from updating valuation assumptions and converting to a new valuation system in the third quarter of 2008, as well as the market's unfavorable impact on DAC. In response to the accelerated market deterioration in the fourth quarter of 2008, management took action to lower future variable universal life profit expectations based on continued depreciation in contract values and historical equity market return patterns. DAC amortization in 2007 included a $20 million expense from updating valuation assumptions and an immaterial market impact.

losses.

Table of Contents

Our Protection segment pretax income decreased $33 million, or 8%, to $370 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $403 million for the prior year. Our Protection segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, decreased $35 million, or 9%, to $367 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $402 million for the prior year primarily due to higher claims and general and administrative expenses partially offset by higher premiums.

Net Revenues

Net revenues increased $25 million, or 1%, to $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues, which exclude net realized gains or losses, increased $23 million, or 1%, to $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year due to Auto and Home premium growth.

Premiums increased $29 million, or 3%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.0 billion for the prior year due to growth in Auto and Home premiums driven by higher volumes. Auto and Home policy counts increased 7% period-over-period.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $58 million, or 4%, to $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.6 billion for the prior year due to increases in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, amortization of DAC and general and administrative expense.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased $26 million, or 2%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.1 billion for the prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2011 included a benefit of $4 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to an expense of $44 million in the prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to our Auto and Home business increased from the prior year primarily due to $45 million of catastrophe losses in 2011 compared to $29 million in 2010, as well as higher auto liability reserves. In addition, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased as a result of higher UL claims and an increase in ongoing reserve levels for UL products with secondary guarantees compared to the prior year.

Amortization of DAC increased $18 million, or 10%, to $201 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $183 million for the prior year. Amortization of DAC in 2011 included a benefit of $2 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to a benefit of $22 million in the prior year. Amortization of DAC in 2010 included a benefit of $6 million as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program. The market impact on amortization of DAC was an expense of $2 million in 2011 compared to a benefit of $10 million in the prior year, which was partially offset by a decrease in DAC amortization as a result of better persistency and lower current period profits due to higher direct claims.

Corporate & Other

Our Corporate & Other segment consists of net investment income or loss on corporate level assets, including excess capital held in our subsidiaries and other unallocated equity and other revenues as well as unallocated corporate expenses. The Corporate & Other segment also includes revenues and expenses of CIEs.

Management believes that operating measures, which exclude net realized gains or losses, integration and restructuring charges and the impact of consolidating CIEs for our Corporate & Other segment, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis. See our discussion on the use of these non-GAAP measures in the Overview section above.


Table of Contents

The following table presents the results of operations of our Corporate & Other segment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2008 2007 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $ $1 $(1) NM 
 

Net investment income

  (25) 22  (47) NM 
 

Other revenues

  26  7  19  NM 
           
  

Total revenues

  1  30  (29) (97) %
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  2  6  (4) (67)
           
  

Total net revenues

  (1) 24  (25) NM 
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  1  1     
 

Interest and debt expense

  109  112  (3) (3)
 

Separation costs

    236  (236) NM 
 

General and administrative expense

  253  159  94  59 
           
  

Total expenses

  363  508  (145) (29)
           

Pretax loss

 $(364)$(484)$120  25 %
           

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2011
 2010
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $(1)$ $(1)$ $ $ $(1) NM 

Distribution fees

                 

Net investment income (loss)

  68  95  (27) 273  294  (21) (6) (29)%

Other revenues

  124  94  30  153  125  28  2  7 
  

Total revenues

  191  189  2  426  419  7  (5) (71)

Banking and deposit interest expense

  (1)   (1) 3    3  (4) NM 
  

Total net revenues

  192  189  3  423  419  4  (1) (25)
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  1    1  1    1     

Interest and debt expense

  316  221  95  288  181  107  (12) (11)

General and administrative expense

  218  70  148  185  65  120  28  23 
  

Total expenses

  535  291  244  474  246  228  16  7 

Pretax loss

  (343) (102) (241) (51) 173  (224) (17) (8)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106) (106)   163  163       
  

Pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $(237)$4 $(241)$(214)$10 $(224)$(17) (8)%
  

NM Not Meaningful.

(1)
Includes revenues and expenses of the CIEs; net realized gains or losses; and integration and restructuring charges.

The following table presents the components of the adjustments in the table above:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
 
   
 
 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                   

Net investment income (loss)

 $91 $4 $95 $275 $19 $294 

Other revenues

  94    94  125    125 
  

Total revenues

  185  4  189  400  19  419 

Banking and deposit interest expense

             
  

Total net revenues

  185  4  189  400  19  419 
  

Expenses

                   

Distribution expenses

             

Interest and debt expense

  221    221  181    181 

General and administrative expense

  70    70  56  9  65 
  

Total expenses

  291    291  237  9  246 

Pretax loss

  (106) 4  (102) 163  10  173 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106)   (106) 163    163 
  

Pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $ $4 $4 $ $10 $10 
  
(1)
Other adjustments include net realized gains or losses and integration and restructuring charges.

Our Corporate & Other segment pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial was $237 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $214 million for the prior year. Our Corporate & Other segment pretax operating loss excludes net realized gains or losses, integration and restructuring charges and the impact of consolidating CIEs. Our Corporate & Other segment pretax operating loss was $241 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $224 million for the prior year.

Net revenues decreased $231 million, or 55%, to $192 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $423 million for the prior year reflecting the impact of consolidating CIEs. Operating net revenues, which exclude revenues or losses of CIEs and net realized gains or losses, decreased $1 million, or 25%, to $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $4 million for the prior year.


Table of Contents

Net investment income was $68 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $273 million for the prior year. Net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2011 included a $91 million gain for changes in 2008 was $364 million, an improvementthe assets and liabilities of $120 millionCIEs, primarily debt and underlying syndicated loans, compared to a pretax$275 million gain for the prior year. Operating net investment loss, which excludes net investment income or loss of $484the CIEs and net realized gains or losses, was $27 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $21 million for the prior year.

Other revenues decreased $29 million, or 19%, to $124 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $153 million for the prior year. Operating other revenues, which exclude revenues or losses of the CIEs, increased $2 million, or 7%, to $30 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $28 million for the prior year. During the second quarter of 2011, we reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings a $27 million gain on an interest rate hedge put in place in anticipation of issuing debt between December 2010 and June 2011. Operating other revenues for 2010 included a $25 million benefit from payments related to the Reserve Funds matter.

Total expenses increased $61 million, or 13%, to $535 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $474 million for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude expenses of CIEs and integration and restructuring charges, increased $16 million, or 7%, to $244 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $228 million for the prior year.

Interest and debt expense increased $28 million, or 10%, to $316 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $288 million for the prior year. Operating interest and debt expense, which excludes interest expense on CIE debt, decreased $12 million, or 11%, to $95 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $107 million for the prior year primarily due to lower average debt balances.

General and administrative expense increased $33 million, or 18%, to $218 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $185 million for the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense, which excludes expenses of the CIEs and integration and restructuring charges, increased $28 million, or 23%, to $148 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $120 million for the prior year.


Table of Contents


Consolidated Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009

The following table presents our consolidated results of operations:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2010
 2009
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
  
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $3,784 $(38)$3,822 $2,558 $(2)$2,560 $1,262  49%

Distribution fees

  1,447    1,447  1,182    1,182  265  22 

Net investment income

  2,309  308  2,001  1,998  55  1,943  58  3 

Premiums

  1,179    1,179  1,098    1,098  81  7 

Other revenues

  863  125  738  702  28  674  64  9 
  

Total revenues

  9,582  395  9,187  7,538  81  7,457  1,730  23 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  70    70  141  6  135  (65) (48)
  

Total net revenues

  9,512  395  9,117  7,397  75  7,322  1,795  25 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  2,065    2,065  1,462    1,462  603  41 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  909    909  903    903  6  1 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,750  9  1,741  1,334  154  1,180  561  48 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  127  16  111  217  (93) 310  (199) (64)

Interest and debt expense

  290  181  109  127    127  (18) (14)

General and administrative expense

  2,737  129  2,608  2,434  105  2,329  279  12 
  

Total expenses

  7,878  335  7,543  6,477  166  6,311  1,232  20 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

  1,634  60  1,574  920  (91) 1,011  563  56 

Income tax provision

  350  (36) 386  184  (37) 221  165  75 
  

Income from continuing operations

  1,284  96  1,188  736  (54) 790  398  50 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (24) (24)   1  1       
  

Net income

  1,260  72  1,188  737  (53) 790  398  50 

Less: Net income attributable to non- controlling interests

  163  163    15  15       
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $1,097 $(91)$1,188 $722 $(68)$790 $398  50%
  
(1)
Includes the elimination of management fees we earn for services provided to the CIEs and the related expense; revenues and expenses of the CIEs; net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; and income (loss) from discontinued operations. Income tax provision is calculated using the statutory tax rate of 35% on applicable adjustments.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the components of the adjustments in the table above:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2010
 2009
 
 
   
 
 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                   

Management and financial advice fees

 $(38)$ $(38)$(2)$ $(2)

Distribution fees

             

Net investment income

  275  33  308  2  53  55 

Premiums

             

Other revenues

  125    125  28    28 
  

Total revenues

  362  33  395  28  53  81 

Banking and deposit interest expense

        6    6 
  

Total net revenues

  362  33  395  22  53  75 
  

Expenses

                   

Distribution expenses

             

Interest credited to fixed accounts

             

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

    9  9    154  154 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

    16  16    (93) (93)

Interest and debt expense

  181    181       

General and administrative expense

  18  111  129  7  98  105 
  

Total expenses

  199  136  335  7  159  166 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

  163  (103) 60  15  (106) (91)

Income tax provision

    (36) (36)   (37) (37)
  

Income from continuing operations

  163  (67) 96  15  (69) (54)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (24) (24)   1  1 
  

Net income

  163  (91) 72  15  (68) (53)

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  163    163  15    15 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $ $(91)$(91)$ $(68)$(68)
  
(1)
Other adjustments include net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; and income (loss) from discontinued operations.

Overall

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial increased $375 million, or 52%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $722 million for the prior year. Operating earnings exclude net realized gains or losses; the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization; integration and restructuring charges; income (loss) of discontinued operations; and the impact of consolidating CIEs. Operating earnings increased $398 million, or 50%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $790 million for the prior year driven by improved client activity, market appreciation and net inflows in wrap account assets and variable annuities, as well as improved scale from the Columbia Management Acquisition.

The total pretax impacts on our revenues and expenses for 2010 attributable to the review of valuation assumptions and models on an operating basis were as follows:

Segment Pretax Benefit (Charge)
 Other Revenues
 Benefits,
Claims, Losses
and Settlement
Expenses

 Amortization
of DAC

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Valuation assumptions and model changes:

             

Annuities

 $ $(256)$353 $97 

Protection

  (20) (44) 22  (42)
  

Total

 $(20)$(300)$375 $55 
  

Table of Contents

The total pretax impacts on our revenues and expenses for 2009 attributable to the review of valuation assumptions on an operating basis were as follows:

Segment Pretax Benefit (Charge)
 Other
Revenues

 Benefits,
Claims, Losses
and Settlement
Expenses

 Amortization
of DAC

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Valuation assumptions:

             

Annuities

 $ $57 $61 $118 

Protection

  (65) 33  55  23 
  

Total

 $(65)$90 $116 $141 
  

Net Revenues

Net revenues increased $2.1 billion, or 29%, to $9.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $7.4 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues exclude net realized gains or losses and revenues or losses of the CIEs and include the fees we earn from services provided to the CIEs. Operating net revenues increased $1.8 billion, or 25%, to $9.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $7.3 billion for the prior year primarily due to growth in asset-based management fees and distribution fees driven by higher asset levels reflecting the Columbia Management Acquisition, market appreciation and net inflows in wrap account assets and variable annuities, as well as increased client activity.

Management and financial advice fees increased $1.2 billion, or 48%, to $3.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.6 billion for the prior year. Operating management and financial advice fees include the fees we earn from services provided to the CIEs. Operating management and financial advice fees increased $1.3 billion, or 49%, to $3.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.6 billion for the prior year primarily due to higher asset levels reflecting the Columbia Management Acquisition, market appreciation and net inflows in wrap account assets and variable annuities. The daily average S&P 500 Index increased 20% compared to the prior year. Wrap account assets increased $16.2 billion, or 20%, to $97.5 billion at December 31, 2010 compared to the prior year due to net inflows and market appreciation. Average variable annuities contract accumulation values increased $10.3 billion, or 25%, from the prior year due to higher equity market levels and net inflows. Total Asset Management AUM increased $213.7 billion, or 88%, to $456.8 billion at December 31, 2010 compared to the prior year primarily due to the Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation, partially offset by net outflows.

Distribution fees increased $265 million, or 22%, to $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.2 billion for the prior year primarily due to higher asset-based fees driven by growth in assets from the Columbia Management Acquisition, market appreciation and net inflows in wrap account assets and variable annuities, as well as increased client activity.

Net investment income increased $311 million, or 16%, to $2.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year. Net investment income for 2010 included a $275 million gain for changes in the assets and liabilities of CIEs, primarily debt and underlying syndicated loans, compared to $2 million in 2007. The improvement wasthe prior year. Operating net investment income excludes net realized gains or losses and changes in the assets and liabilities of CIEs. Operating net investment income increased $58 million, or 3%, to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.9 billion for the prior year primarily due to a decrease$42 million increase in separation costsinvestment income on fixed maturity securities driven by higher fixed annuity account balances and higher investment yields, as well as higher investment yields and increased account balances related to assets supporting our Protection business, partially offset by lower investment income related to certificates.

Premiums increased $81 million, or 7%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.1 billion for the prior year primarily due to growth in Auto and Home premiums driven by higher volumes, as well as higher sales of $236 million, as the separation from American Express was completed in 2007. immediate annuities with life contingencies. Auto and Home policy counts increased 9% period-over-period.

Other revenues increased $19$161 million, primarily dueor 23%, to recognizing a gain from extinguishing $43$863 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $702 million for the prior year. Operating other revenues exclude revenues of our junior notes in the fourth quarter of 2008. These positive impacts were offset by a $47CIEs. Operating other revenues increased $64 million, decrease in net investment income and a $94or 9%, to $738 million increase in general and administrative expense. The decrease in net investment income wasfor the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $674 million for the prior year primarily due to lower investment incomecharges related to updating valuation assumptions and models, higher fees from variable annuity guarantees, and a $25 million benefit from payments related to the Reserve Funds matter in 2010, partially offset by a $58 million benefit in 2009 from repurchasing our junior notes at a discount. Other revenues in 2010 included a charge of $20 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to a charge of $65 million in the prior year.


Table of Contents

Banking and deposit interest expense decreased $71 million, or 50%, to $70 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $141 million for the prior year primarily due to lower certificate balances as a result of the run-off of certificate rate promotions and a decrease in crediting rates on fixed maturitiescertificate products.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $1.4 billion, or 22%, to $7.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $6.5 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses exclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and lower income on seed money investmentsDAC amortization; integration and other investments. The increaserestructuring charges; and expenses of the CIEs. Operating expenses increased $1.2 billion, or 20%, to $7.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $6.3 billion for the prior year primarily due to increases in distribution expenses, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses and general and administrative expense, was drivenpartially offset by a $77decrease in amortization of DAC.

Distribution expenses increased $603 million, expense relatedor 41%, to changes in fair value$2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.5 billion for the prior year as a result of Lehman Brothers securities that we purchasedmarket appreciation and the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well as higher advisor compensation from various 2a-7 money market mutual funds managed by RiverSource Investments, expense of $36business growth.

Interest credited to fixed accounts increased $6 million, or 1%, to $909 million for the costyear ended December 31, 2010 compared to $903 million for the prior year driven by higher average fixed annuity account balances, partially offset by a lower average crediting rate on interest sensitive fixed annuities. Average fixed annuities contract accumulation values increased $600 million, or 4%, to $14.5 billion for 2010 compared to the prior year. The average fixed annuity crediting rate excluding capitalized interest decreased to 3.8% in 2010 compared to 3.9% in the prior year.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased $416 million, or 31%, to $1.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.3 billion for the prior year. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, which exclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of guaranteeing specific client holdingshedges and DSIC amortization, increased $561 million, or 48%, to $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.2 billion for the prior year driven by the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2010 included an unaffiliated money market mutual fundexpense of $300 million from updating valuation assumptions and $60models compared to a benefit of $90 million in restructuring charges. Partially offsetting these increasesthe prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to our Auto and Home business increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher business volumes and higher claims driven by $11 million in catastrophe losses from a hail storm in the Phoenix area and a $16 million reserve increase for higher auto liability claims. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to our immediate annuities with life contingencies increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher premiums. In addition, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in the second quarter of 2010, higher disability income and long-term care insurance claims and higher reserves for UL products with secondary guarantees compared to the prior year.

Amortization of DAC decreased $90 million, or 41%, to $127 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $217 million for the prior year. Operating amortization of DAC, which excludes the DAC offset to the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, decreased $199 million, or 64%, to $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $310 million for the prior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and models, as well as the market impact on amortization of DAC. Operating amortization of DAC in 2010 included a benefit of $375 million from updating valuation assumptions and models compared to a benefit of $116 million in the prior year. The market impact on amortization of DAC was a benefit of $31 million in 2010 compared to a benefit of $26 million in the prior year. An increase in DAC amortization related to higher variable annuity gross profits was partially offset by a decrease as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in the second quarter of 2010.

Interest and debt expense increased $163 million to $290 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $127 million for the prior year. Interest and debt expense in 2010 included $181 million of interest expense on CIE debt compared to nil in the prior year. Operating interest and debt expense excludes interest expense on CIE debt. Operating interest and debt expense decreased $18 million, or 14%, to $109 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $127 million for the prior year primarily due to an expense of $13 million in 2009 related to the early retirement of $450 million of our senior notes due 2010.

General and administrative expense increased $303 million, or 12%, to $2.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.4 billion for the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense were decreases relatedexcludes integration and restructuring charges and expenses of the CIEs. Integration and restructuring charges increased $13 million to our$111 million in 2010 compared to $98 million in the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense reduction initiatives andincreased $279 million, or 12%, to $2.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.3 billion for the prior year primarily reflecting ongoing expenses from the Columbia Management Acquisition, as well as higher performance based compensation partially offset by lower incentive compensation accruals.hedge fund performance compensation.


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations including income attributable to noncontrolling interests was 21.5% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 20.0% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in our effective tax rate primarily reflects an increase in pretax income relative to tax advantaged items, which was partially offset by $53 million in benefits from tax planning and the completion of certain audits. Our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations excluding net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was 23.8% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 20.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our operating effective tax rate was 24.5% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 21.9% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our operating effective tax rate:

 
 Years Ended December 31 
 
 2010
 2009
 
 
   
 
 GAAP
 Operating
 GAAP
 Operating
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

 $1,634 $1,574 $920 $1,011 

Less: Pretax income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  163    15   
  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision excluding CIEs

 $1,471 $1,574 $905 $1,011 
  

Income tax provision from continuing operations

 $350 $386 $184 $221 

Effective tax rate

  21.5% 24.5% 20.0% 21.9%

Effective tax rate excluding noncontrolling interests

  23.8% 24.5% 20.3% 21.9%
  

Results of Operations by Segment

Year Ended December 31, 20072010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20062009

The following table presents our consolidated resultssummary financial information by segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2010
 2009
 
 
   
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Advice & Wealth Management

                   

Net revenues

 $3,343 $1 $3,342 $2,804 $(15)$2,819 

Expenses

  3,027  7  3,020  2,837  64  2,773 
  

Pretax income (loss)

 $316 $(6)$322 $(33)$(79)$46 
  

Asset Management

                   

Net revenues

 $2,368 $3 $2,365 $1,346 $(3)$1,349 

Expenses

  2,050  95  1,955  1,286  30  1,256 
  

Pretax income

 $318 $(92)$410 $60 $(33)$93 
  

Annuities

                   

Net revenues

 $2,500 $9 $2,491 $2,265 $44 $2,221 

Expenses

  1,852  25  1,827  1,617  61  1,556 
  

Pretax income

 $648 $(16)$664 $648 $(17)$665 
  

Protection

                   

Net revenues

 $2,047 $1 $2,046 $1,964 $27 $1,937 

Expenses

  1,644    1,644  1,467    1,467 
  

Pretax income

 $403 $1 $402 $497 $27 $470 
  

Corporate & Other

                   

Net revenues

 $423 $419 $4 $26 $24 $2 

Expenses

  474  246  228  278  13  265 
  

Pretax loss

  (51) 173  (224) (252) 11  (263)

Less: Pretax income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  163  163    15  15   
  

Pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $(214)$10 $(224)$(267)$(4)$(263)
  

Eliminations

                   

Net revenues

 $(1,169)$(38)$(1,131)$(1,008)$(2)$(1,006)

Expenses

  (1,169) (38) (1,131) (1,008) (2) (1,006)
  

Pretax income

 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  
(1)
Includes the elimination of operationsmanagement fees we earn for services provided to the years ended December 31, 2007CIEs and 2006:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2007 2006 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $3,238 $2,700 $538  20 %
 

Distribution fees

  1,762  1,569  193  12 
 

Net investment income

  2,018  2,225  (207) (9)
 

Premiums

  1,063  1,070  (7) (1)
 

Other revenues

  724  707  17  2 
           
  

Total revenues

  8,805  8,271  534  6 
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  249  245  4  2 
           
  

Total net revenues

  8,556  8,026  530  7 
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  2,057  1,728  329  19 
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  847  955  (108) (11)
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,179  1,132  47  4 
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  551  472  79  17 
 

Interest and debt expense

  112  101  11  11 
 

Separation costs

  236  361  (125) (35)
 

General and administrative expense

  2,558  2,480  78  3 
           
  

Total expenses

  7,540  7,229  311  4 
           

Pretax income

  1,016  797  219  27 

Income tax provision

  202  166  36  22 
           

Net income

 $814 $631 $183  29 %
           

In the second quarter of 2008, we reclassified the mark-to-market adjustment on certain derivatives from net investment income to various expense lines where the mark-to-market adjustment on the related embedded derivative resides. The mark-to-market adjustmentexpense; revenues and expenses of the CIEs; net realized gains or losses; the market impact on derivatives hedging variable annuity living benefits, equity indexed annuitiesnet of hedges, DSIC and stock market certificates were reclassified to benefits, claims, lossesDAC amortization; and settlement expenses, interest credited to fixed accountsintegration and banking and deposit interest expense, respectively. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Overall

Consolidated net income for 2007 was $814 million, up $183 million from $631 million for 2006. This income growth reflected strong growth in fee-based businesses driven by net inflows in wrap accounts and variable annuities, market appreciation and continued advisor productivity gains. Also contributing to our income growth was a decline of $125 million in our non-recurring separation costs. These positives were partially offset by higher distribution expenses which reflect the higher levels of assets under management and overall business growth.

Income in both 2007 and 2006 was impacted by non-recurring separation costs of $236 million and $361 million, respectively ($154 million and $235 million, respectively, after-tax). The impact of our annual third quarter detailed review of DAC and the related valuation assumptions ("DAC unlocking") was a net pretax expense of $30 million ($20 million after-tax) in 2007, compared to a net benefit of $25 million ($16 million after-tax) in 2006.

Net revenues

Our revenue growth in management and financial advice fees was primarily driven by the growth in our fee-based businesses. Management and financial advice fees increased in 2007 to $3.2 billion, up $538 million, or 20%, from $2.7 billion in 2006. Wrap account assets grew 23% and variable annuity account assets increased 16% over the prior year driven by strong net inflows and market appreciation. Overall, managed assets increased 2% over the prior year period.

restructuring charges.

Table of Contents

Distribution fees for 2007 were $1.8 billion, up $193 million, or 12%, from 2006 driven by strong advisor cash sales, up 3% from 2006, higher asset balances, an increase in the sale of direct investments, as clients had more products available to choose from and strong net inflows into wrap accounts. Distribution fees were also positively impacted by market appreciation.

Net investment income for 2007 decreased $207 million from 2006, primarily driven by decreased volume in annuity fixed accounts and certificates, partially offset by net investment income related to Ameriprise Bank, FSB ("Ameriprise Bank") and a $22 million decrease in the allowance for loan losses on commercial mortgage loans. Included in net investment income are net realized investment gains on Available-for-Sale securities of $44 million and $51 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net realized investment gains in 2006 included a gain of $23 million related to recoveries on WorldCom securities.

Premiums in 2007 decreased $7 million, or 1%, to $1.1 billion. This decrease was attributable to a decline in premiums related to immediate annuities with life contingencies, partially offset by increases in auto and home insurance premiums resulting from increased policy counts.

Other revenues in 2007 increased $17 million, or 2%, to $724 million. This increase was due to the deconsolidation of a variable interest entity, resulting in $68 million in other revenues, and higher fees from variable annuity rider charges and cost of insurance charges for variable universal life ("VUL") and UL products. These increases were partially offset by decreases in other revenues related to certain consolidated limited partnerships and proceeds of $25 million in 2007, compared to $66 million in 2006, received from the sale of our defined contribution recordkeeping business.

Banking and deposit interest expense in 2007 increased $4 million, or 2%. This increase was primarily due to the full year impact of Ameriprise Bank and higher rates of interest paid on certificates, partially offset by a decrease in certificate sales and balances.

Expenses

Total expenses reflect an increase in distribution expenses, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, the amortization of DAC, the impact of DAC unlocking and general and administrative expense. These increases were partially offset by decreases in separation costs and interest credited to fixed accounts.

In 2007, we recorded net expense from DAC unlocking of $30 million, primarily comprised of $16 million in DAC amortization expense and a $14 million increase in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses. In 2006, we recorded a net benefit from DAC unlocking of $25 million, primarily comprised of a $38 million benefit in DAC amortization expense, a $12 million increase in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses and a $1 million decrease in contract and policy charges and other fees. The DAC unlocking net expense of $30 million in 2007 consisted of a $35 million increase in expense from updating product persistency assumptions, a $13 million decrease in expense from updating assumptions related to separate account fee levels and net variable annuity rider charges and an $8 million increase in expense from updating all other assumptions. The DAC unlocking net benefit in 2006 primarily reflected a $25 million benefit from modeling increased product persistency and a $15 million benefit from modeling improvements in mortality, offset by negative impacts of $8 million from modeling lower variable product fund fee revenue and $8 million from model changes related to variable life second to die insurance.

Distribution expenses increased $329 million, or 19%. The increase primarily reflected higher commissions paid driven by overall business growth and increases in advisor productivity, as reflected by 18% growth in net revenue per advisor and higher assets under management.

Interest credited to fixed accounts reflected a decrease related to annuities of $108 million primarily attributable to the continued decline in balances in fixed annuities and the fixed portion of variable annuities.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased $47 million, or 4%. The cost of providing for guaranteed benefits associated with our variable annuity living benefits increased by $99 million, primarily due to changes in financial market factors. The increase in variable annuity living benefit costs was partially offset by a $6 million related change in DSIC, $23 million in lower VUL/UL claims and a $41 million decrease in benefit provisions for life contingent immediate annuities. The impact of DAC unlocking was an increase of $14 million in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2007, compared to $12 million in 2006.

The increase in DAC amortization in 2007 reflected the impact of DAC unlocking related to amortization in each year. DAC unlocking resulted in an increase of $16 million in DAC amortization expense in 2007 compared to a decrease of $38 million in 2006. In addition, underlying increases to DAC amortization in 2007 were due to growth in business volumes and the recurring impact of adopting SOP 05-1, partially offset by a decrease in the amortization of DAC driven by the mark-to-market impact of variable annuity guaranteed living benefit riders.

The increase in interest and debt expense in 2007 was due to the issuance of $500 million of our junior notes in May 2006.

Separation costs incurred in 2007 were primarily associated with separating and reestablishing our technology platforms. In 2006, these costs were primarily associated with separating and reestablishing our technology platforms and establishing the Ameriprise Financial brand. All separation costs have been incurred as of December 31, 2007.


Table of Contents

General and administrative expense in 2007 relative to 2006 increased 3%, or $78 million, to $2.6 billion as a result of increased expense related to professional and consultant fees representing increased spending on investment initiatives, expenses related to Ameriprise Bank, increased hedge fund performance compensation and an increase in technology related costs, partially offset by a decrease in expense in 2007 related to our defined contribution recordkeeping business which we sold in the second quarter of 2006.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate decreased to 19.9% in 2007 from 20.8% in 2006 primarily due to the impact of a $16 million tax benefit related to the finalization of certain income tax audits and a $19 million tax benefit relating to our plan to begin repatriating earnings of certain Threadneedle entities through dividends partially offset by lower levels of tax advantaged items relative to the level of pretax income.

Results of Operations by Segment

Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006Advice & Wealth Management

The following tables present summary financial information by segment and reconciliation to consolidated totals derived from Note 26 to our Consolidated Financial Statementstable presents the changes in wrap account assets for the years ended December 31, 200731:

 
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Beginning balance

 $81.3 $62.2 

Net flows

  7.6  7.9 

Market appreciation and other

  8.6  11.2 
  

Ending balance

 $97.5 $81.3 
  

Wrap account assets increased $16.2 billion, or 20%, to $97.5 billion compared to the prior year due to market appreciation and 2006:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2007 Percent Share
of Total
 2006 Percent Share
of Total
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Total net revenues

             
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $3,813  45 %$3,335  42 %
 

Asset Management

  1,762  21  1,751  22 
 

Annuities

  2,206  26  2,202  27 
 

Protection

  1,985  23  1,891  24 
 

Corporate & Other

  24    28   
 

Eliminations

  (1,234) (15) (1,181) (15)
          
  

Total net revenues

 $8,556  100 %$8,026  100 %
          

Total expenses

             
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $3,528  47 %$3,139  43 %
 

Asset Management

  1,455  19  1,498  21 
 

Annuities

  1,783  24  1,738  24 
 

Protection

  1,500  20  1,457  20 
 

Corporate & Other

  508  7  578  8 
 

Eliminations

  (1,234) (17) (1,181) (16)
          
  

Total expenses

 $7,540  100 %$7,229  100 %
          

Pretax income (loss)

             
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $285  28 %$196  25 %
 

Asset Management

  307  30  253  32 
 

Annuities

  423  42  464  58 
 

Protection

  485  48  434  54 
 

Corporate & Other

  (484) (48) (550) (69)
          
  

Pretax income

 $1,016  100 %$797  100 %
          

Table of Contents

Advice & Wealth Management

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planning and advice, as well as full service brokerage and banking services, primarily to retail clients, through our financial advisors. Our affiliated advisors utilize a diversified selection of both proprietary and non-proprietary products to help clients meet their financial needs.net inflows.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Advice & Wealth Management segment for the years ended December 31, 2007segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2010
 2009
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,370 $ $1,370 $1,088 $ $1,088 $282  26%

Distribution fees

  1,696    1,696  1,491    1,491  205  14 

Net investment income

  273  1  272  293  (15) 308  (36) (12)

Other revenues

  71    71  65    65  6  9 
  

Total revenues

  3,410  1  3,409  2,937  (15) 2,952  457  15 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  67    67  133    133  (66) (50)
  

Total net revenues

  3,343  1  3,342  2,804  (15) 2,819  523  19 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  1,954    1,954  1,644    1,644  310  19 

General and administrative expense

  1,073  7  1,066  1,193  64  1,129  (63) (6)
  

Total expenses

  3,027  7  3,020  2,837  64  2,773  247  9%
  

Pretax income (loss)

 $316 $(6)$322 $(33)$(79)$46 $276  NM 
  

NM Not Meaningful.

(1)
Adjustments include net realized gains or losses and 2006:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2007 2006 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,350 $1,080 $270  25 %
 

Distribution fees

  2,218  2,034  184  9 
 

Net investment income

  399  377  22  6 
 

Other revenues

  76  62  14  23 
           
  

Total revenues

  4,043  3,553  490  14 
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  230  218  12  6 
           
  

Total net revenues

  3,813  3,335  478  14 
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  2,349  2,068  281  14 
 

General and administrative expense

  1,179  1,071  108  10 
           
  

Total expenses

  3,528  3,139  389  12 
           

Pretax income

 $285 $196 $89  45 %
           
integration and restructuring charges.

Our Advice & Wealth Management segment reported pretax income was $316 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a loss of $285$33 million in 2007, up from $196the prior year. Our Advice & Wealth Management segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses and integration charges, was $322 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $46 million in 2006.the prior year driven by higher asset-based fees partially offset by higher distribution expenses. Pretax margin for 2010 was 9.5% and operating pretax margin was 9.6%.

Net revenuesRevenues

Net revenues were $3.8$3.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.8 billion in the prior year, an increase of $478$539 million, or 14%19%. Operating net revenues exclude net realized gains or losses. Operating net revenues were $3.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.8 billion in the prior year, an increase of $523 million, or 19%, driven by growth in average fee-based assets, as well as increased client activity.

Management and financial advice fees increased $270$282 million, or 25%26%, in 2007 asto $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2006.$1.1 billion for the prior year driven by growth in average fee-based assets resulting from market appreciation and net inflows in wrap account assets. The increase was leddaily average S&P 500 Index increased 20% compared to the prior year. Wrap account assets increased $16.2 billion, or 20%, to $97.5 billion at December 31, 2010 compared to the prior year due to market appreciation and net inflows.


Table of Contents

Distribution fees increased $205 million, or 14%, to $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.5 billion for the prior year primarily driven by growth in average fee-based assets resulting from market appreciation and net increasesinflows in wrap account assets, of 23% from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007 and an increase in planning fees due to accelerated financial plan delivery standards. The growth in distribution fees of $184 million, or 9% from 2006, reflected an increase in cash sales and market appreciation. as well as increased client activity.

Net investment income increased $22decreased $20 million, or 6%7%, in 2007to $273 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2006 primarily due$293 million for the prior year. Operating net investment income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, decreased $36 million, or 12%, to an increase attributable$272 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a full$308 million for the prior year of activity from Ameriprise Bank partially offsetdriven by lower invested assets resulting from net outflows in certificates, as well as lower average account balances in certificate products. yields on invested assets related to certificates.

Banking and deposit interest expense increased $12decreased $66 million, or 50%, to $67 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $133 million for the prior year primarily due to lower certificate balances as a full yearresult of activitythe run-off of Ameriprise Bank and highercertificate rate promotions, as well as a decrease in crediting rates of interest paid on certificates partially offset by decreases in certificate sales and balances.products.

Expenses

Total expenses increased $389$190 million, or 12%. The7%, to $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.8 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude integration charges, increased $247 million, or 9%, to $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.8 billion for the prior year due to an increase in distribution expenses reflectspartially offset by a decrease in general and administrative expense.

Distribution expenses increased $310 million, or 19%, to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.6 billion for the prior year primarily due to growth in average fee-based assets, as well as higher commissions paid driven by increased sales volumes and higher assets under management. advisor compensation from business growth.

General and administrative expense increaseddecreased $120 million, or 10%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.2 billion for the prior year. Integration charges decreased $57 million to $7 million in 2010 compared to $64 million in the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense, which excludes integration charges, decreased $63 million, or 6%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflecting cost controls.

Asset Management

The following tables present the changes in Columbia and Threadneedle managed assets:

 
 January 1,
2010

 Net Flows
 Market
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
& Other(1)

 Foreign
Exchange

 December 31,
2010

 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Columbia Managed Assets:(2)

                

Retail Funds

 $76.9 $(5.2)$146.8(3)$ $218.5 

Institutional Funds

  62.3  (7.1) 72.0(4)   127.2 

Alternative Funds

  9.9    0.1    10.0 

Less: Eliminations

  (0.1)   (0.1)   (0.2)
  

Total Columbia Managed Assets

  149.0  (12.3) 218.8    355.5 

Threadneedle Managed Assets:

                

Retail Funds

  29.1  1.9  3.5  (1.1) 33.4 

Institutional Funds

  66.8  (2.2) 8.7  (2.4) 70.9 

Alternative Funds

  1.9  (0.2) (0.4)   1.3 
  

Total Threadneedle Managed Assets

  97.8  (0.5) 11.8  (3.5) 105.6 

Less: Sub-Advised Eliminations

  (3.6) (0.1) (0.6)   (4.3)
  

Total Managed Assets

 $243.2 $(12.9)$230.0 $(3.5)$456.8 
  
(1)
Distributions of Retail Funds are included in market appreciation/(depreciation) and other.

(2)
Prior to the Columbia Management Acquisition, the domestic managed assets of our Asset Management segment, which are now included in Columbia Managed Assets, were managed by RiverSource Investments.

(3)
Included in Market appreciation/(depreciation) and other is $118.1 billion due to higher staffingthe Columbia Management Acquisition, including $3 billion of assets that were transferred to RiverSource Sub-advised through the implementation of the Portfolio Navigator program, and vendor costsan additional $13.1 billion of Portfolio Navigator related assets sub-advised by others.

(4)
Included in Market appreciation/(depreciation) and other is $68.4 billion due to a full year of activity of Ameriprise Bank and increases in professional, consulting and technology fees, partially offset by a decline in legal and regulatory costs.

the Columbia Management Acquisition.

Table of Contents

Asset

 
 January 1,
2009

 Net Flows
 Market
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
& Other(1)

 Foreign
Exchange

 December 31,
2009

 
  
 
 (in billions)
 

Columbia Managed Assets:(2)

                

Retail Funds

 $63.9 $(0.5)$13.5 $ $76.9 

Institutional Funds

  54.7  2.6  5.0    62.3 

Alternative Funds

  9.4  (0.1) 0.6    9.9 

Less: Eliminations

  (0.1)       (0.1)
  

Total Columbia Managed Assets

  127.9  2.0  19.1    149.0 

Threadneedle Managed Assets:

                

Retail Funds

  16.3  4.9  6.1(3) 1.8  29.1 

Institutional Funds

  55.3  (1.4) 7.5  5.4  66.8 

Alternative Funds

  2.6  0.1  (1.0) 0.2  1.9 
  

Total Threadneedle Managed Assets

  74.2  3.6  12.6  7.4  97.8 

Less: Sub-Advised Eliminations

  (2.5) 0.3  (1.4)   (3.6)
  

Total Managed Assets

 $199.6 $5.9 $30.3 $7.4 $243.2 
  
(1)
Distributions of Retail Funds are included in market appreciation/(depreciation) and other.

(2)
Prior to the Columbia Management

Our Acquisition, the domestic managed assets of our Asset Management segment, provideswhich are now included in Columbia Managed Assets, were managed by RiverSource Investments.

(3)
Included in Market appreciation/(depreciation) and other are assets due to the addition of Standard Chartered Bank's World Express Funds investment advicebusiness.

Columbia assets under management were $355.5 billion at December 31, 2010 compared to $149.0 billion a year ago, driven by the Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation, partially offset by net outflows. Equity and fixed income investment products toperformance remained strong across one-, three- and five-year periods. Retail net outflows of $5.2 billion in 2010 were primarily in equity and subadvisory portfolios, reflecting industry-wide outflows in equities and lower retail sales as a result of pending fund mergers. Institutional net outflows of $7.1 billion in 2010 were primarily in lower basis point fixed income portfolios.

Threadneedle assets under management were $105.6 billion at December 31, 2010, up 8% from a year ago reflecting year-over-year market appreciation and retail net inflows, partially offset by negative foreign currency translation and institutional clients.net outflows. Total net outflows of $0.5 billion in 2010 reflected net outflows in lower basis point institutional portfolios, partially offset by retail net inflows from higher sales from European investors. Institutional net outflows in 2010 primarily reflected continued outflows in Zurich-related portfolios. Investment track records remained strong across one-, three- and five-year periods.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Asset Management segment for the years ended December 31, 2007segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2010
 2009
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,979 $ $1,979 $1,106 $ $1,106 $873  79%

Distribution fees

  358    358  216    216  142  66 

Net investment income

  17  3  14  18  (3) 21  (7) (33)

Other revenues

  15    15  8    8  7  88 
  

Total revenues

  2,369  3  2,366  1,348  (3) 1,351  1,015  75 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  1    1  2    2  (1) (50)
  

Total net revenues

  2,368  3  2,365  1,346  (3) 1,349  1,016  75 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  734    734  371    371  363  98 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  20    20  21    21  (1) (5)

General and administrative expense

  1,296  95  1,201  894  30  864  337  39 
  

Total expenses

  2,050  95  1,955  1,286  30  1,256  699  56%
  

Pretax income

 $318 $(92)$410 $60 $(33)$93 $317  NM 
  

NM Not Meaningful.

(1)
Adjustments include net realized gains or losses and 2006:integration charges.

Table of Contents

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2007 2006 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $1,362 $1,221 $141  12 %
 

Distribution fees

  322  336  (14) (4)
 

Net investment income

  48  63  (15) (24)
 

Other revenues

  50  157  (107) (68)
           
  

Total revenues

  1,782  1,777  5   
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  20  26  (6) (23)
           
  

Total net revenues

  1,762  1,751  11  1 
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  464  415  49  12 
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  33  52  (19) (37)
 

General and administrative expense

  958  1,031  (73) (7)
           
  

Total expenses

  1,455  1,498  (43) (3)
           

Pretax income

 $307 $253 $54  21 %
           

Our Asset Management segment pretax income was $307$318 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $60 million for the prior year. Our Asset Management segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses and integration charges, was $410 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $93 million for the prior year reflecting eight months of earnings from business acquired in 2007, up $54 million, or 21%, from $253 million in 2006.the Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation. Pretax margin for 2010 was 13.4% and operating pretax margin was 17.3%.

Net revenuesRevenues

Net revenues increased $11 million,$1.0 billion, or 1%76%, in 2007to $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2006. $1.3 billion for the prior year driven by an increase in asset-based management fees and distribution fees due to growth in assets from the Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation.

Management and financial advice fees increased $141$873 million, or 12%79%, driven byto $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.1 billion for the prior year primarily due to growth in assets from the Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation, and positive flows in retail funds, the impact of market appreciation on Threadneedle assets, as well as an increase in Threadneedlepartially offset by lower hedge fund performance fees. The daily average S&P 500 Index increased 20% compared to the prior year. Total Asset Management and financial advice fees in 2006 included $27 million relatedmanaged assets increased $213.7 billion, or 88%, to revenues from our defined contribution recordkeeping business that we sold in$456.8 billion at December 31, 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2006. The expenses from the sale of our defined contribution recordkeeping business areprior year primarily reflected in general and administrative expense in 2006. Distribution fees decreased slightly due to the continued trend of client movement into wrap accounts which have lower up-front fees. Net investment income declined dueColumbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation, partially offset by net outflows.

Distribution fees increased $142 million, or 66%, to a decrease in interest income and a decline in the value of seed money investments. Other revenues declined due to a decrease in revenue related to certain consolidated limited partnerships and a decrease of $41$358 million for proceeds receivedthe year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $216 million for the prior year primarily driven by growth in assets from the sale of our defined contribution recordkeeping business in 2006.Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation.

Expenses

Total expenses decreased $43increased $764 million, or 3%. The59%, to $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.3 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude integration charges, increased $699 million, or 56%, to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.3 billion for the prior year due to an increase in distribution expenses reflects higher distribution fees and marketing support costs driven by highergeneral and administrative expense. We realized integration gross expense synergies related to the Columbia Management Acquisition of approximately $75 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Distribution expenses increased $363 million, or 98%, to $734 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $371 million for the prior year primarily due to growth in assets under management in RiverSource Funds. The decline infrom the amortization of DAC was driven by decreased B share sales resulting in fewer deferred commissions to be amortized. Columbia Management Acquisition and market appreciation.

General and administrative expense increased $402 million, or 45%, to $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $894 million for the prior year. Integration charges increased $65 million to $95 million in 2010 compared to $30 million in the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense, which excludes integration charges, increased $337 million, or 39%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $864 million for the prior year primarily reflected allocated corporatedue to increased operating costs of Columbia Management, as well as higher performance based compensation partially offset by lower legal expenses and support function costs, increased as a result of Threadneedlelower hedge fund performance fee expense, professional fees and an increase in technology costs. These increases were more than offset by a decline in expense related to certain consolidated limited partnerships as well as a decrease in expense in 2007 related to our defined contribution recordkeeping business, which we sold in the second quarter of 2006.compensation.


Table of Contents


Annuities

Our Annuities segment provides variable and fixed annuity products of RiverSource Life companies to our retail clients primarily through our Advice & Wealth Management segment and to the retail clients of unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution.

The following table presents the results of operations of our Annuities segment for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2007 2006 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $510 $392 $118  30 %
 

Distribution fees

  267  213  54  25 
 

Net investment income

  1,196  1,409  (213) (15)
 

Premiums

  95  138  (43) (31)
 

Other revenues

  138  50  88  NM 
           
  

Total revenues

  2,206  2,202  4   
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

         
           
  

Total net revenues

  2,206  2,202  4   
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  194  158  36  23 
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  706  810  (104) (13)
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  329  280  49  18 
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  318  287  31  11 
 

General and administrative expense

  236  203  33  16 
           
  

Total expenses

  1,783  1,738  45  3 
           

Pretax income

 $423 $464 $(41) (9)%
           

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2010
 2009
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $546 $ $546 $438 $ $438 $108  25%

Distribution fees

  284    284  247    247  37  15 

Net investment income

  1,318  9  1,309  1,323  44  1,279  30  2 

Premiums

  150    150  104    104  46  44 

Other revenues

  202    202  153    153  49  32 
  

Total revenues

  2,500  9  2,491  2,265  44  2,221  270  12 

Banking and deposit interest expense

                 
  

Total net revenues

  2,500  9  2,491  2,265  44  2,221  270  12 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  268    268  211    211  57  27 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  762    762  759    759  3   

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  691  9  682  418  154  264  418  NM 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  (76) 16  (92) 37  (93) 130  (222) NM 

Interest and debt expense

  2    2        2  NM 

General and administrative expense

  205    205  192    192  13  7 
  

Total expenses

  1,852  25  1,827  1,617  61  1,556  271  17%
  

Pretax income

 $648 $(16)$664 $648 $(17)$665 $(1)  
  

NM Not Meaningful.

(1)
Adjustments include net realized gains or losses and the market impact on variable annuity living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization.

Our Annuities segment pretax income was $423$648 million for 2007, down $41both 2010 and 2009. Our Annuities segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses and the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization, decreased $1 million or 9%, from $464to $664 million for 2006.the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $665 million in the prior year.

Net revenuesRevenues

Net revenues wereincreased $235 million, or 10%, to $2.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.3 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues, which exclude net realized gains or losses, increased $270 million, or 12%, to $2.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.2 billion an increase of $4 million in 2007 compared to 2006. for the prior year reflecting increased management fees from higher separate account balances, increased premiums from immediate annuities with life contingencies and higher fees from variable annuity guarantees.

Management and financial advice fees relatedincreased $108 million, or 25%, to variable annuities increased in 2007, driven by positive flows and market appreciation. The increase in distribution fees was due primarily$546 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to an increase in marketing support payments driven by flows and market appreciation. These increases were partially offset by a decline in net investment income which was primarily attributable to declining average fixed account balances. The decline in premiums was attributable to lower volumes related to immediate annuities with life contingencies. The increase in other revenues was$438 million for the prior year due to the deconsolidation of a variable interest entity, resulting in a gain of $49 million. Also contributing to the increase in other revenues was an increase in our guaranteed benefit riderhigher fees on variable annuities driven by volume increases.higher separate account balances. Average variable annuities contract accumulation values increased $10.3 billion, or 25%, from the prior year due to higher equity market levels and net inflows. Variable annuity net inflows during 2010 were $1.2 billion driven by our introduction in the third quarter of a new variable annuity in the Ameriprise channel, RAVA 5, and an updated guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit rider in the Ameriprise and third-party channels.

Expenses

Total expensesDistribution fees increased $45$37 million, or 3%. The increase in distribution expenses reflected increased sales. The increase in amortization of DAC was15%, to $284 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $247 million for the prior year primarily due to growth in business volumeshigher fees on variable annuities driven by higher separate account balances.

Net investment income decreased $5 million to $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010. Operating net investment income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, increased $30 million, or 2%, to $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily driven by higher fixed annuity account balances and the recurring impact of SOP 05-1,higher investment yields, partially offset by a decrease in amortization driven by the mark-to-marketnegative impact of variable annuity guaranteed living benefit riders and the impactimplementation of DAC unlockingchanges to the Portfolio Navigator program. With these changes, assets of clients participating in 2007. General and administrative expense increased duethe Portfolio Navigator program were reallocated, pursuant to higher technology and overhead costs. The increasestheir consent. This reallocation in expense were partially offset bypart resulted in a decreaseshift of assets from interest bearing investments in interest credited to fixed accounts, driven by declining accumulation values as well as decreases in life contingent immediate annuity benefit provisions.the general account into separate accounts.


Table of Contents

Premiums increased $46 million, or 44%, to $150 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $104 million for the prior year due to higher sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies.

Other revenues increased $49 million, or 32%, to $202 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $153 million for the prior year due to higher fees from variable annuity guarantees.

ProtectionExpenses

Our Protection segment offersTotal expenses increased $235 million, or 15%, to $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.6 billion for the prior year. Operating expenses, which exclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, DSIC and DAC amortization, increased $271 million, or 17%, to $1.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.6 billion for the prior year primarily due to increases in distribution expenses and benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses partially offset by a varietydecrease in amortization of protection productsDAC.

Distribution expenses increased $57 million, or 27%, to address$268 million for the identified protectionyear ended December 31, 2010 compared to $211 million for the prior year primarily due to higher variable annuity compensation.

Interest credited to fixed accounts increased $3 million to $762 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $759 million for the prior year due to higher average fixed annuity account balances partially offset by a lower average crediting rate on interest sensitive fixed annuities. Average fixed annuities contract accumulation values increased $600 million, or 4%, to $14.5 billion for 2010 compared to the prior year. The average fixed annuity crediting rate excluding capitalized interest decreased to 3.8% in 2010 compared to 3.9% in the prior year.

Benefits, claims, losses and risk management needssettlement expenses increased $273 million, or 65%, to $691 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $418 million for the prior year. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, which exclude the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges and DSIC amortization, increased $418 million to $682 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $264 million for the prior year primarily driven by the impact of updating valuation assumptions and model changes. Operating benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2010 included an expense of $256 million from updating valuation assumptions and model changes compared to a benefit of $57 million in the prior year. The market impact to DSIC was a benefit of $3 million in 2010 compared to a benefit of $4 million in the prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to our retail clients includingimmediate annuities with life disability incomecontingencies increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher premiums. In addition, benefits, claims, losses and property-casualty insurance.settlement expenses increased as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in the second quarter of 2010.

Amortization of DAC decreased $113 million to a benefit of $76 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to an expense of $37 million in the prior year. Operating amortization of DAC, which excludes the DAC offset to the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits, decreased $222 million to a benefit of $92 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to an expense of $130 million for the prior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and model changes. Operating amortization of DAC in 2010 included a benefit of $353 million from updating valuation assumptions and model changes compared to a benefit of $61 million in the prior year. The market impact on DAC amortization in 2010 was a benefit of $21 million compared to a benefit of $23 million in the prior year. An increase in DAC amortization related to higher variable annuity gross profits was partially offset by a decrease as a result of the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program in the second quarter of 2010.

General and administrative expense increased $13 million, or 7%, to $205 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $192 million for the prior year primarily driven by additional expenses related to new product introductions and enhancements.


Table of Contents


Protection

The following table presents the results of operations of our Protection segment for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2007 2006 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $68 $56 $12  21 %
 

Distribution fees

  102  96  6  6 
 

Net investment income

  361  355  6  2 
 

Premiums

  1,002  954  48  5 
 

Other revenues

  453  431  22  5 
           
  

Total revenues

  1,986  1,892  94  5 
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  1  1     
           
  

Total net revenues

  1,985  1,891  94  5 
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  62  94  (32) (34)
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  141  145  (4) (3)
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  850  852  (2)  
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  200  133  67  50 
 

General and administrative expense

  247  233  14  6 
           
  

Total expenses

  1,500  1,457  43  3 
           

Pretax income

 $485 $434 $51  12 %
           

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2010
 2009
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating Change
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Management and financial advice fees

 $54 $ $54 $47 $ $47 $7  15%

Distribution fees

  96    96  97    97  (1) (1)

Net investment income

  429  1  428  422  27  395  33  8 

Premiums

  1,047    1,047  1,013    1,013  34  3 

Other revenues

  422    422  386    386  36  9 
  

Total revenues

  2,048  1  2,047  1,965  27  1,938  109  6 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  1    1  1    1     
  

Total net revenues

  2,047  1  2,046  1,964  27  1,937  109  6 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  32    32  22    22  10  45 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  147    147  144    144  3  2 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,059    1,059  916    916  143  16 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  183    183  159    159  24  15 

General and administrative expense

  223    223  226    226  (3) (1)
  

Total expenses

  1,644    1,644  1,467    1,467  177  12 
  

Pretax income

 $403 $1 $402 $497 $27 $470 $(68) (14)%
  
(1)
Adjustments include net realized gains or losses.

Our Protection segment pretax income was $485$403 million for 2007, up $51the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $94 million, or 12%19%, from $434$497 million in 2006.for the prior year. Our Protection segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, was $402 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $68 million, or 14%, from $470 million for the prior year.

Net revenuesRevenues

Net revenues wereincreased $83 million, or 4%, to $2.0 billion an increase of $94for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $2.0 billion for the prior year. Operating net revenues, which exclude net realized gains or losses, increased $109 million, or 5%6%, fromto $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.9 billion in 2006. This increase wasfor the resultprior year primarily due to the impact of updating valuation assumptions and model changes and an increase in autonet investment income and homepremiums.

Management and financial advice fees increased $7 million, or 15%, to $54 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $47 million for the prior year primarily due to higher management fees from VUL separate account growth due to market appreciation.

Net investment income increased $7 million, or 2%, to $429 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $422 million for the prior year. Operating net investment income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, increased $33 million, or 8%, to $428 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $395 million for the prior year primarily due to higher investment yields and increased general account assets.

Premiums increased $34 million, or 3%, to $1.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.0 billion for the prior year due to growth in Auto and Home premiums driven by higher volumes. Auto and Home policy counts an increaseincreased 9% period-over-period.

Other revenues increased $36 million, or 9%, to $422 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $386 million for the prior year primarily due to updating valuation assumptions and model changes. Other revenues in management2010 included a charge of $20 million from updating valuation assumptions and financial advice fees, driven by an increasemodel changes compared to a charge of $65 million in fees from our VUL/UL products, and an increase in other revenues which was due primarily to the deconsolidationprior year.


Table of a variable interest entity, resulting in a gain of $19 million.Contents

Expenses

Total expenses wereincreased $177 million, or 12%, to $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.5 billion an increase of $43 million, or 3%, from 2006. The increase wasfor the prior year primarily due to updating valuation assumptions and model changes and an increase in insurance claims compared to the amortizationprior year.

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses increased $143 million, or 16%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $916 million for the prior year primarily due to updating valuation assumptions and model changes and higher claims in 2010. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2010 included an expense of DAC, which was largely the result of DAC unlocking. DAC unlocking resulted in an increase of $20$44 million in amortization expense in 2007,from updating valuation assumptions and model changes compared to a decreasebenefit of $52$33 million in 2006. Additionally, in 2006, $28 million of additional DAC amortization was recognized as a result of a DAC adjustmentthe prior year. Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses related to autoour Auto and home insurance products. Also contributingHome business increased compared to the increase in expense was an increase in general and administrative expense, which wasprior year primarily due to higher business volumes and higher claims driven by $11 million in catastrophe losses from a hail storm in the Phoenix area and a $16 million reserve increase for higher auto liability claims. In addition, benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in 2010 included higher disability income and long-term care insurance claims and higher reserves for UL products with secondary guarantees compared to the prior year.

Amortization of DAC increased technology$24 million, or 15%, to $183 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $159 million in the prior year primarily due to updating valuation assumptions and overhead costs. These increases were partially offset bymodel changes. Amortization of DAC for 2010 included a decreasebenefit of $22 million from updating valuation assumptions and model changes compared to a benefit of $55 million in distribution expenses, which was due primarilythe prior year. The market impact on DAC resulted in a benefit of $10 million in 2010 compared to an increasea benefit of $3 million in capitalized expense.


Table of Contentsthe prior year.

Corporate & Other

The following table presents the results of operations of our Corporate & Other segment for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:segment:

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2007 2006 Change 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

Revenues

             
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $1 $ $1  NM 
 

Net investment income

  22  29  (7) (24)%
 

Other revenues

  7  6  1  17 
           
  

Total revenues

  30  35  (5) (14)
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  6  7  (1) (14)
           
  

Total net revenues

  24  28  (4) (14)
           

Expenses

             
 

Distribution expenses

  1    1  NM 
 

Interest and debt expense

  112  101  11  11 
 

Separation costs

  236  361  (125) (35)
 

General and administrative expense

  159  116  43  37 
           
  

Total expenses

  508  578  (70) (12)
           

Pretax loss

 $(484)$(550)$66  12 %
           

 
 Years Ended December 31,  
  
 
 
 2010
 2009
  
  
 
 
    
  
 
 
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 GAAP
 Less:
Adjustments(1)

 Operating
 Operating
Change

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                         

Net investment income (loss)

 $273 $294 $(21)$(57)$2 $(59)$38  64%

Other revenues

  153  125  28  90  28  62  (34) (55)
  

Total revenues

  426  419  7  33  30  3  4  NM 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  3    3  7  6  1  2  NM 
  

Total net revenues

  423  419  4  26  24  2  2  100 
  

Expenses

                         

Distribution expenses

  1    1  3    3  (2) (67)

Interest and debt expense

  288  181  107  127    127  (20) (16)

General and administrative expense

  185  65  120  148  13  135  (15) (11)
  

Total expenses

  474  246  228  278  13  265  (37) (14)

Pretax loss

  (51) 173  (224) (252) 11  (263) 39  15 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  163  163    15  15       
  

Pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $(214)$10 $(224)$(267)$(4)$(263)$39  15%
  

NM Not Meaningful.

(1)
Includes revenues and expenses of the CIEs, net realized gains or losses and integration and restructuring charges.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the components of the adjustments in the table above:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2010
 2009
 
 
   
 
 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 CIEs
 Other
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Adjustments

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

                   

Net investment income (loss)

 $275 $19 $294 $2 $ $2 

Other revenues

  125    125  28    28 
  

Total revenues

  400  19  419  30    30 

Banking and deposit interest expense

        6    6 
  

Total net revenues

  400  19  419  24    24 
  

Expenses

                   

Distribution expenses

             

Interest and debt expense

  181    181��      

General and administrative expense

  56  9  65  9  4  13 
  

Total expenses

  237  9  246  9  4  13 

Pretax loss

  163  10  173  15  (4) 11 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  163    163  15    15 
  

Pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $ $10 $10 $ $(4)$(4)
  
(1)
Other adjustments include net realized gains or losses and integration and restructuring charges.

Our Corporate & Other segment pretax loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial was $214 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $267 million in the prior year. Our Corporate & Other segment pretax operating loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial excludes net realized gains or losses, integration and restructuring charges and the impact of consolidating CIEs. Our Corporate & Other segment pretax operating loss attributable to Ameriprise Financial was $224 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $263 million in 2007the prior year.

Net revenues increased $397 million to $423 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $26 million for the prior year primarily reflecting revenues of CIEs. Operating net revenues, which exclude revenues of CIEs and net realized gains or losses, increased $2 million to $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Net investment income was $484$273 million an improvement of $66 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a pretax segment loss of $550$57 million in 2006.the prior year. Net investment income in 2010 primarily reflects changes in the assets and liabilities of CIEs, primarily debt and underlying syndicated loans. The improvement wasdecrease in operating net investment loss, which excludes revenues of CIEs and net realized gains or losses, reflects lower transfer priced interest income allocated to the Annuities and Protection segments for maintaining excess liquidity.

Other revenues increased $63 million, or 70%, to $153 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a decrease in separation costs of $125 million, as the separation from American Express was completed in 2007. This improvement was offset partially by an increase in revenues of CIEs. Operating other revenues, which exclude revenues of CIEs, decreased $34 million, or 55%, to $28 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, due to a $58 million gain on the repurchase of certain of our junior notes in 2009 partially offset by a $25 million benefit from the payments related to the Reserve Funds matter in 2010.

Total expenses increased $196 million, or 71%, to $474 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $278 million for the prior year primarily reflecting expenses of CIEs. Operating expenses, which exclude expenses of CIEs and integration and restructuring charges, decreased $37 million, or 14%, to $228 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $265 million for the prior year.

Interest and debt expense increased $161 million to $288 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $127 million for the prior year primarily reflecting interest expense of the CIE debt. Operating interest and debt expense, which excludes interest expense of the CIE debt, decreased $20 million, or 16%, to $107 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $127 million for the prior year primarily due to an expense of $13 million in 2009 related to the early retirement of $450 million of our senior notes due 2010.

General and administrative expense increased $37 million, or 25%, to $185 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $148 million for the prior year. Operating general and administrative expense, which wasexcludes expenses of the resultCIEs and integration and restructuring charges, decreased $15 million, or 11%, to $120 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $135 million for the prior year.


Table of increased technology and overhead costs.Contents


Fair Value Measurements

We report certain assets and liabilities at fair value; specifically, separate account assets, derivatives, embedded derivatives, properties held by our consolidated property funds, and most investments and cash equivalents. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS 157") defines fair value, provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value assumes the exchange of assets or liabilities occurs in orderly transactions. Companies are not permitted to use market prices that are the result of a forced liquidation or distressed sale. We include actual market prices, or observable inputs, in our fair value measurements to the extent available. BrokerNon-binding broker quotes are obtained when quotes from third party pricing services are not available. We validate prices obtained from third parties through a variety of means such as: price variance analysis, subsequent sales testing, stale price review, price comparison across pricing vendors and due diligence reviews of vendors. SFAS 157 does not require the use of market prices that are the result of a forced liquidation or distressed sale.as described in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Inactive Markets

Through our own experience transacting in the marketplace and through discussions with our pricing vendors, we believe that the market for non-agency residential mortgage backed securities is inactive. Indicators of inactive markets include: pricing services' reliance on brokers or discounted cash flow analyses to provide prices, an increase in the disparity between prices provided by different pricing services for the same security, unreasonably large bid-offer spreads and a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. In certain cases, this market inactivity has resulted in our applying valuation techniques that rely more on an income approach (discounted cash flows using market rates) than on a market approach (prices from pricing services). We consider market observable yields for other asset classes we consider to be of similar risk which includes nonperformance and liquidity for individual securities to set the discount rate for applying the income approach to certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities. The discount rates used for these securities at December 31, 2008 ranged from 13% to 22%.


Table of Contents

At the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2008, $539 million of prime non-agency residential mortgage backed securities were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because management believes the market for these prime quality assets is now inactive. The loss recognized on these assets during the fourth quarter of 2008 was $72 million, of which $16 million was included in net investment income and $56 million was included in other comprehensive loss.

Non-Agency Residential Mortgage Backed Securities Backed by Sub-prime, Alt-A or Prime Collateral

Sub-prime mortgage lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with weak credit profiles. Alt-A mortgage lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have credit ratings above sub-prime but may not conform to government-sponsored standards. Prime mortgage lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with good credit profiles. We have exposure to each of these types of loans predominantly through mortgage backed and asset backed securities. The slow downslowdown in the U.S. housing market, combined with relaxed underwriting standards by some originators, has recently led to higher delinquency and loss rates for some of these investments. RecentPersistent market conditions have increased the likelihood of other-than-temporary impairments for certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities. As a part of our risk management process, an internal rating system is used in conjunction with market data as the basis of analysis to assess the likelihood that we will not receive all contractual principal and interest payments for these investments. For the investments that are more at risk for impairment, we perform our own assessment of projected cash flows incorporating assumptions about default rates, prepayment speeds and loss severity and geographic concentrations to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment should be recognized. Based on this analysis, other than non-agency mortgage backed securities that had credit-related impairments recorded in 2008, all contractual payments are expected to be received.

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2008,2011, our non-agency residential mortgage backed and asset backed securities backed by sub-prime, Alt-A or prime mortgage loans by credit rating and vintage year (in millions):year:

 
 AAA AA A BBB BB & Below Total 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 
Sub-prime                                     
 2003 & prior $2 $1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $2 $1 
 2004  17  14  7  3      11  6      35  23 
 2005  86  74  13  8      7  3      106  85 
 2006  78  69  28  18          14  14  120  101 
 2007                  2  2  2  2 
 2008  10  8                  10  8 
                          
Total Sub-prime $193 $166 $48 $29 $ $ $18 $9 $16 $16 $275 $220 
                          

Alt-A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 2003 & prior $8 $7 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $8 $7 
 2004  96  74  15  11              111  85 
 2005  338  217  24  20  15  12  13  13  2  2  392  264 
 2006  111  104  29  29  26  26  35  34  8  8  209  201 
 2007  158  84  4  4  5  5  41  34  10  10  218  137 
 2008                         
                          
Total Alt-A $711 $486 $72 $64 $46 $43 $89 $81 $20 $20 $938 $694 
                          

Prime

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 2003 & prior $123 $101 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $123 $101 
 2004  160  131  37  21      2  2      199  154 
 2005  262  178  52  28  14  6          328  212 
 2006  5  4  6  2              11  6 
 2007          17  11          17  11 
 2008  19  31                  19  31 
                          
Total Prime $569 $445 $95 $51 $31 $17 $2 $2 $ $ $697 $515 
                          
Grand Total $1,473 $1,097 $215 $144 $77 $60 $109 $92 $36 $36 $1,910 $1,429 
                          

 
 AAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 BB & Below
 Total
 
 
   
 
 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Sub-prime

                                     

2003 & prior

 $5 $5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $5 $5 

2004

  20  18  2  2  5  5      14  10  41  35 

2005

  41  40  36  33  10  10      28  23  115  106 

2006

  41  40          4  4  42  29  87  73 

2007

  15  14          2  2  5  1  22  17 

2008

      6  5              6  5 

Re-Remic(1)

  10  10      3  3  27  26      40  39 
  

Total Sub-prime

 $132 $127 $44 $40 $18 $18 $33 $32 $89 $63 $316 $280 
  

Alt-A

                                     

2003 & prior

 $1 $1 $11 $12 $ $ $3 $3 $ $ $15 $16 

2004

      11  10  16  17  53  46  31  22  111  95 

2005

          1  1  9  7  262  176  272  184 

2006

                  114  74  114  74 

2007

                  168  94  168  94 

2008

                         

2009

                         

2010

  67  66                  67  66 

Re-Remic(1)

  180  178      3  3  7  7      190  188 
  

Total Alt-A

 $248 $245 $22 $22 $20 $21 $72 $63 $575 $366 $937 $717 
  

Prime

                                     

2003 & prior

 $107 $110 $43 $42 $109 $105 $10 $10 $ $ $269 $267 

2004

  17  17  56  53  23  22  30  27  62  44  188  163 

2005

      3  3  18  19  6  6  221  182  248  210 

2006

          14  15      32  31  46  46 

2007

          27  25      31  28  58  53 

Re-Remic(1)

  1,664  1,734  255  266  238  241      9  16  2,166  2,257 
  

Total Prime

 $1,788 $1,861 $357 $364 $429 $427 $46 $43 $355 $301 $2,975 $2,996 
  

Grand Total

 $2,168 $2,233 $423 $426 $467 $466 $151 $138 $1,019 $730 $4,228 $3,993 
  
(1)
Re-Remics of mortgage backed securities are prior vintages with cash flows structured into senior and subordinated bonds. Credit enhancement has been increased through the Re-Remic process on the securities we own.

Table of Contents

European Exposure

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2011, our exposure to European debt by country segregated between sovereign and non-sovereign (financial and non-financial corporate debt) exposure:

 
 Sovereign
 Financials
 Non-Financials
 Total
 
 
   
 
 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair
Value

 % of
Invested
Assets(1)

 
  
 
 (in millions, except percentage)
 

Greece

 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $  0.0%

Italy

          117  114  117  114  0.3%

Ireland

          40  39  40  39  0.1%

Portugal

                  0.0%

Spain

          134  130  134  130  0.3%
  

Subtotal

          291  283  291  283  0.7%

Other European exposure

  30  31  420  387  938  1,004  1,388  1,422  3.4%
  

Total

 $30 $31 $420 $387 $1,229 $1,287 $1,679 $1,705  4.1%
  
(1)
Invested assets include cash and cash equivalents and investments.

The non-financial corporate debt holdings in Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain are primarily in utilities/telecommunications. The non-financial corporate debt holdings in other European countries are multinational companies concentrated in utilities and non-cyclical industrials. We have no exposure to deeply subordinated instruments. We do not hedge our European exposure and we have no unfunded commitments related to our European debt holdings as of December 31, 2011.

Fair Value of Liabilities and Nonperformance Risk

SFAS 157 also requires companiesCompanies are required to measure the fair value of liabilities at the price that would be received to transfer the liability to a market participant (an exit price). Since there is not a market for our obligations of our variable annuity riders, we consider the assumptions participants in a hypothetical market would make to reflect an exit price. As a result, we adjust the valuation of variable annuity riders by updating certain contractholder assumptions, adding explicit margins to provide for profit, risk and expenses, and adjusting the rates used to discount expected cash flows to reflect a current market estimate of our nonperformance risk. The nonperformance risk adjustment is based on non-binding broker quotes for credit default swaps that are adjusted to estimate the risk of our life insurance company subsidiaries not fulfilling these liabilities. Consistent with general market conditions, this estimate resulted in a spread over the LIBOR swap curve as of December 31, 2008.2011. As our estimate of this spread widens or tightens, the liability will decrease or increase. If this nonperformance credit spread moves to a zero


Table of Contents


spread over the LIBOR swap curve, the reduction to net income would be approximately $235$226 million, net of DAC and DSIC amortization and income taxes, based on December 31, 20082011 credit spreads.

The nonperformance risk for our derivatives is managed and mitigated primarily through the use of master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements. As of December 31, 2008, any deterioration in our derivative counterparties' credit would not materially impact our financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

We maintained substantial liquidity during 2008. Atthe year ended December 31, 2008,2011. At both December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had $6.2$2.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents compared to $3.8 billion at December 31, 2007. Approximately $1.6 billion of the increase in cash and cash equivalents was from increases in collateral received from derivative counterparties as our living benefits hedge portfolio gained in value. Excluding the collateral balances, cash and cash equivalents were $4.4 billion and $3.6 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.equivalents. We have additional liquidity available through an unsecured revolving credit facility for $750up to $500 million that expires in September 2010.November 2015. Under the terms of the underlying credit agreement, we can increase this facility to $1.0 billion.$750 million upon satisfaction of certain approval requirements. Available borrowings under this facility are reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. We have had no borrowings under this credit facility and had $2 million of outstanding letters of credit at December 31, 2008.2011.

In March 2010, we issued $750 million of 5.30% senior notes due 2020. A portion of the proceeds was used to retire $340 million of debt that matured in November 2010. On April 30, 2010, we closed on the Columbia Management Acquisition and paid $866 million in the second quarter with cash on hand and assumed liabilities of $30 million. Our subsidiaries, Ameriprise Bank, FSB and RiverSource Life Insurance Company ("RiverSource Life"), are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Des Moines, which provides these subsidiaries with access to collateralized borrowings. As of December 31, 2011, we had no borrowings from the FHLB. Beginning in 2010, we entered into repurchase agreements to reduce reinvestment risk from higher levels of expected annuity net cash flows. Repurchase agreements allow us to receive cash to reinvest in longer-duration assets, while paying back the short-term debt with cash flows generated by the fixed income portfolio. The balance of repurchase agreements at December 31, 2011 was $504 million, which is collateralized with agency residential mortgage backed securities and commercial mortgage backed securities from our investment portfolio. We believe cash flows from operating activities, available cash balances and our availability of revolver borrowings will be sufficient to fund our operating liquidity needs.


The following table summarizes the ratings for Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise Financial") and certainTable of its subsidiaries as of the date of this filing:


A.M. Best
Company
Contents
Standard &
Poor's Rating
Services
Moody's
Investors
Service
Fitch Ratings
Ltd.
Claims Paying Ratings
RiverSource LifeA+AA-Aa3AA-
IDS Property Casualty Insurance CompanyAN/RN/RN/R
Credit Ratings
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.a-AA3A-

On January 29, 2009, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P") and Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") affirmed the ratings of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and RiverSource Life citing excellent capitalization and solid financial flexibility. At the same time, both S&P and Moody's revised their outlook on Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and RiverSource Life from stable to negative citing diminished earnings power resulting from the challenging equity and credit markets.

On July 10, 2008, S&P raised its counterparty credit rating on Ameriprise Financial, Inc. to 'A' from 'A-' and indicated its ratings outlook on our company as stable, citing our strong balance sheet and strong cash coverage of our stable life insurance and asset management operations, supported by an innovative financial advisory distribution channel. These positive factors are somewhat offset by sensitivity to equity-market and debt-market volatility and competitive pressure in our key segments. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'AA-' counterparty credit and financial strength ratings on our life insurance subsidiaries, RiverSource Life and RiverSource Life of NY.

Our capital transactions in 2008 and 2007 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock, dividends paid to our shareholders and the repurchase of debt.

Dividends from Subsidiaries

Ameriprise Financial is primarily a parent holding company for the operations carried out by our wholly owned subsidiaries. Because of our holding company structure, our ability to meet our cash requirements, including the payment of dividends on our common stock, substantially depends upon the receipt of dividends or return of capital from our subsidiaries, particularly our life insurance subsidiary, RiverSource Life,Life; our face-amount certificate subsidiary, Ameriprise Certificate Company ("ACC"),; AMPF Holding Corporation, which is the parent company of our retail introducing broker-dealer subsidiary, Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. ("AFSI"), and our clearing broker-dealer subsidiary, American Enterprise Investment Services Inc. ("AEIS"),; our autoAuto and homeHome insurance subsidiary, IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company ("IDS Property Casualty"), doing business as Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance, Threadneedle, RiverSource Service Corporation andInsurance; our transfer agent subsidiary, Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.; our investment advisory company, RiverSource Investments.Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC; and Threadneedle. The


Table of Contents


payment of dividends by many of our subsidiaries is restricted and certain of our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory capital requirements.

Actual capital and regulatory capital requirements for our wholly owned subsidiaries subject to regulatory capital requirements were as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 Actual Capital Regulatory Capital Requirements 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 
RiverSource Life(1)(2) $2,722 $3,017 $551 $442 
 RiverSource Life of NY(1)(2)  229  288  58  34 
IDS Property Casualty(1)(3)  436  424  124  117 
 Ameriprise Insurance Company(1)(3)  47  49  2  2 
ACC(4)(5)  243  210  264  201 
Threadneedle(6)  227  232  140  149 
Ameriprise Bank, FSB(7)  113  161  123  127 
AFSI(3)(4)  132  102  #  # 
Ameriprise Captive Insurance Company  20  16  9  7 
Ameriprise Trust Company(3)  35  60  28  36 
AEIS(3)(4)  74  56  4  5 
Securities America, Inc.(3)(4)  17  13  #  # 
RiverSource Distributors, Inc.(3)(4)  41  30  #  # 
RiverSource Fund Distributors, Inc.(3)(4)  7    1   
RiverSource Services, Inc.(3)(4)  1    #   
Ameriprise Advisor Services, Inc.(3)(4)  22    5   

 
 Actual Capital
 Regulatory Capital
Requirements

 
 
   
 
 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 December 31,
2011

 December 31,
2010

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

RiverSource Life(1)(2)

 $3,058 $3,813 $619 $652 

RiverSource Life of NY(1)(2)

  254  291  41  38 

IDS Property Casualty(1)(3)

  431  411  148  141 

Ameriprise Insurance Company(1)(3)

  41  44  2  2 

ACC(4)(5)

  164  184  151  173 

Threadneedle(6)

  218  182  170  104 

Ameriprise Bank, FSB(7)

  402  302  391  294 

AFSI(3)(4)

  115  119  2  1 

Ameriprise Captive Insurance Company(3)

  43  38  16  12 

Ameriprise Trust Company(3)

  44  41  41  40 

AEIS(3)(4)

  122  115  42  35 

Securities America, Inc.(3)(4)(8)

    2    # 

RiverSource Distributors, Inc.(3)(4)

  27  24  #  # 

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.(3)(4)

  30  27  #  # 
  
#
Amounts are less than $1 million.

(1)
Actual capital is determined on a statutory basis.

(2)
Regulatory capital requirement is based on the statutory risk-based capital filing.

(3)
Regulatory capital requirement is based on the applicable regulatory requirement, calculated as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007.2010.

(4)
Actual capital is determined on an adjusted GAAP basis.

(5)
ACC is required to hold capital in compliance with the Minnesota Department of Commerce and SEC capital requirements. As of December 31, 2008, ACC's capital dropped to 4.61% and 4.97% per the Minnesota Department of Commerce and SEC capital requirements, respectively. Ameriprise Financial promptly provided additional capital to ACC in January 2009 to bring capital back above the 5% requirement. Ameriprise Financial and ACC entered into a Capital Support Agreement on March 2, 2009, pursuant to which Ameriprise Financial agrees to commit such capital to ACC as is necessary to satisfy applicable minimum capital requirements, up to a maximum commitment of $115 million.

(6)
Actual capital and regulatory capital requirements are determined in accordance with U.K. regulatory legislation. The actual capital and the regulatory capital requirement forrequirements at December 31, 20082011 represent management's preliminary internal assessment at September 30, 2011 of the risk based requirementrequirements, as specified by FSA regulations. The actual capitalregulations and regulatory capital requirement forsubmitted to the FSA in December 31, 2007 represent expense based FSA requirements in force at that time.2011.

(7)
Ameriprise Bank is required to holdmaintain capital in compliance with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) policy regarding de novo depository institutions, which requires a Tier 1 (core) capital ratioOffice of not less than 8% during its first three yearsthe Comptroller of operations. AsCurrency ("OCC") regulations and policies. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the responsibility for the ongoing examination, supervision, and regulation of December 31, 2008, Ameriprise Bank's Tier 1 core capital dropped to 7.36%. Ameriprise Financial promptly provided additional capital tofederal savings associations, including Ameriprise Bank, transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision to the OCC effective July 21, 2011.

(8)
Securities America was sold in January 2009 to bring the Tier 1 core capital back above the 8% de novo requirement.fourth quarter of 2011.

In addition to the particular regulations restricting dividend payments and establishing subsidiary capitalization requirements, we take into account the overall health of the business, capital levels and risk management considerations in determining a dividend strategy for payments to our company from our subsidiaries, and in deciding to use cash to make capital contributions to our subsidiaries.


Table of Contents

In 2008,During the year ended December 31, 2011, the parent holding company received cash dividends or a return of capital from its subsidiaries of $1.1$1.2 billion (including $750 million from RiverSource Life) and contributed cash to its subsidiaries of $638$128 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2011, RiverSource Life paid an $850 million dividend to the parent holding company consisting of which $441 million was in support of acquisitions inhigh-quality, short-duration securities. During the fourth quarter of 2008. In 2007, subsidiaries paid cash dividends of $1.6 billion and received $40 million in contributions. In 2006,year ended December 31, 2010, the parent holding company received cash dividends or a return of capital from its subsidiaries of $670$912 million (including $500 million from RiverSource Life) and paid contributionscontributed cash to its subsidiaries of $220$73 million.


Table of Contents

The following table sets outpresents the cash dividends that could have been paid to the parent holding company, net of cash capital contributions made by the parent holding company, and the dividend capacity (amount within the limitations of the applicable regulatory authorities as further described below)below, excluding extraordinary dividends for the following subsidiaries:years ended December 31:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Cash dividends paid/(contributions made), net

          

RiverSource Life

 $775 $900 $300 

Ameriprise Bank

  (82)   (172)

AEIS

  10  108  82 

ACC

  (115) 70  70 

RiverSource Investments

  (336) 100  60 

RiverSource Service Corporation

  15  22  60 

Threadneedle

  52  50  43 

Ameriprise Trust Company

  16  12  42 

Securities America Financial Corporation

  (25) (17) (25)

AFSI

  140  100  (20)

IDS Property Casualty

  50  185  6 

Other

  1  (12) 4 
        
 

Total

 $501 $1,518 $450 
        

Dividend capacity

          

RiverSource Life(1)

 $523 $469 $328 

Ameriprise Bank

       

AEIS(2)

  74  159  114 

ACC(2)

    79  93 

RiverSource Investments

  164  279  173 

RiverSource Service Corporation

  16  26  68 

Threadneedle

  111  134  63 

Ameriprise Trust Company

  11  22  4 

Securities America Financial Corporation

  17     

AFSI(2)

  272  201  84 

IDS Property Casualty(3)

  42  52  46 

Other

  11  9  8 
        
 

Total dividend capacity

 $1,241 $1,430 $981 
        

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
  
 

RiverSource Life(1)

 $1,200 $886 $253 

AEIS(2)

      154 

ACC(3)

  70  171  87 

Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC

  295  191  89 

Columbia Management Investment Services Corporation

  5    3 

Threadneedle

  82  125  95 

Ameriprise Trust Company

  1    4 

Securities America Financial Corporation(4)

    2  15 

AFSI(2)

      78 

IDS Property Casualty(5)

  40  44  42 

Ameriprise Captive Insurance Company

  27  26  16 

RiverSource Distributors, Inc. 

  26  23  41 

AMPF Holding Corporation(2)

  334  282   

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. 

  30  27  13 
  

Total dividend capacity

 $2,110 $1,777 $890 
  
(1)
RiverSource Life dividends in excess of statutory unassigned funds require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, RiverSource Life's primary regulator, and are subject to potential disapproval. In addition, dividends whose fair market value, together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12 months, exceeds the greater of (1) the previous year's statutory net gain from operations or (2) 10% of the previous year-end statutory capital and surplus are referred to as "extraordinary dividends." Extraordinary dividends also require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, and are subject to potential disapproval. For dividends exceeding these thresholds, RiverSource Life provided notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce and received responses indicating that it did not object to the payment of these dividends.

(2)
The dividend capacity for ACC is based on capital held in excessIn 2009, AEIS and AFSI became subsidiaries of regulatory requirements.AMPF Holding Corporation. For AFSIAEIS and AEIS,AFSI the dividend capacity is based on an internal model used to determine the availability of dividends, while maintaining net capital at a level sufficiently in excess of minimum levels defined by Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

(3)
The dividend capacity for ACC is based on capital held in excess of regulatory requirements.

(4)
Securities America was sold in the fourth quarter of 2011.

(5)
The dividend capacity for IDS Property Casualty is based on the lesser of (1) 10% of the previous year-end capital and surplus or (2) the greater of (a) net income (excluding realized gains) of the previous year or (b) the aggregate net income of the previous three years excluding realized gains less any dividends paid within the first two years of the three-year period. Dividends that, together with the amount of other distributions made within the preceding 12 months, exceed this statutory limitation are referred to as "extraordinary dividends" and require advance notice to the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Wisconsin, the primary state regulator of IDS Property Casualty, and are subject to potential disapproval.

The portionfollowing table presents the cash dividends paid or return of capital to the parent holding company, net of cash capital contributions made by the parent holding company for the following subsidiaries for the years ended December 31:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

RiverSource Life(1)

 $750 $500 $ 

Ameriprise Bank, FSB

  (71) (35) (85)

ACC

  57  160  25 

Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC

  250  90   

Columbia Management Investment Services Corporation

      3 

Threadneedle

  34  48  49 

Ameriprise Trust Company

  (3) (5)  

Securities America Financial Corporation(2)

  (10)    

IDS Property Casualty

    30  85 

Ameriprise Advisor Capital, LLC

  (44) (33) (10)

AMPF Holding Corporation(3)

  140  84  (38)

Other

      2 
  

Total

 $1,103 $839 $31 
  
(1)
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2011, RiverSource Life paid an $850 million dividend to the parent holding company consisting of high-quality, short-duration securities.

(2)
Securities America was sold in the fourth quarter of 2011.

(3)
In 2009, AEIS and AFSI became subsidiaries of AMPF Holding Corporation. For AEIS and AFSI the dividend capacity is based on an internal model used to determine the availability of dividends, paid by IDS Property Casualty in 2007while maintaining net capital at a level sufficiently in excess of the dividend capacity set forth in the table above were extraordinary dividendsminimum levels defined by Securities and received approval from the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Wisconsin.Exchange Commission rules.

Table of Contents

Share Repurchases, Debt Repurchases and Dividends Paid to Shareholders and Share Repurchases

In 2008,We paid regular quarterly cash dividends to our shareholders totaling $212 million and $183 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. On December 7, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share. The dividend will be paid on February 24, 2012 to our shareholders of record at the close of business on February 10, 2012.

On May 11, 2010, we repurchased 12.7 millionannounced that our board of directors authorized an expenditure of up to $1.5 billion for the repurchase of shares atof our common stock through the date of our 2012 annual shareholders meeting. On June 15, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized an average priceadditional expenditure of $48.26 underup to $2.0 billion for the repurchase of shares of our common stock through June 28, 2013. We intend to fund share repurchase program. Since inception of therepurchases through existing working capital, future earnings and other customary financing methods. The share repurchase program in January 2006, we have purchased 39.3 million shares at an average price of $51.72. At December 31, 2008, there was approximately $1.3 billion remaining to repurchase shares under authorizations approved by our Board of Directors. The share repurchase programs dodoes not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares, and depending on market conditions and other factors, these purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. We used our existing working capital to fund theseAcquisitions under the share repurchases. In light of the current market environment, we have temporarily suspended our stock repurchase program. We may resume activity under our stock repurchase program and begin repurchasing sharesmay be made in the open market, or inthrough privately negotiated transactions from time to time without notice. We reserveor block trades or other means. During the right to suspend any such repurchases and to resume later repurchasing at any time, and expressly disclaim any obligation to maintain or lift any such suspension.

Pursuant to the Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan,year ended December 31, 2011, we reacquired 0.5repurchased a total of 27.9 million shares of our common stock in 2008 through the surrenderat an average price of restricted shares upon vesting and paid in the aggregate $24 million related to the holders' income tax obligations on the vesting date.$52.15 per share. As of December 31, 2011, we had $1.5 billion remaining under our share repurchase authorizations.

In 2008,both 2011 and 2010, we extinguished $43$14 million principal amount of our junior notes.notes due 2066. In the future, we may from time to time seek to retire or purchase additional outstanding debt through cash purchases in the open market, purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, without prior notice. Such repurchases, if any, will depend upon market conditions and other factors. The amounts involved could be material.

We paid regular quarterlyCash Flows

Cash flows of CIEs are reflected in our cash dividendsflows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. Cash held by CIEs is not available for general use by Ameriprise Financial, nor is Ameriprise Financial cash available for general use by its CIEs. As such, the operating, investing and financing cash flows of the CIEs have no impact to our shareholders totaling $143 million, $133 millionthe change in cash and $108 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. On January 28, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.17 per common share. The dividend was paid on February 20, 2009 to our shareholders of record at the close of business on February 6, 2009.equivalents.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $2.02011 increased $331 million to $2.2 billion compared to $724 million$1.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007,2010. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 included a negative impact of $188 million related to CIEs compared to a positive impact of $148 million in the prior year. In 2011, operating cash increased $738 million due to an increase of $1.3 billion. The increase was driven by $1.6 billion in additionalnet cash collateral held related to derivative instruments at December 31, 2008compared to an increase of $111 million in the prior year. Income taxes paid increased $309 million in 2011 compared to the prior year. ThisNet cash provided by operating activities in 2011 included an increase wasin cash generated from higher fee revenue, partially offset by the impact of advancing approximately $300 million to our clients to fund their critical liquidity needs following the freeze of funds in the Reserve's Primary Fund and Government Fund, as well as the costs associated with supporting RiverSource 2a-7 money market funds and an increase in taxes paid compared to the prior year period. Reduced cash inflows related to lower fee revenue were offset by lower cash outflows due to lower expenses, including the completion of separation costs in 2007 and a $100 million settlement paid in 2007.higher payments for distribution expenses.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $724 million for the year ended December 31, 20072010 was $1.8 billion compared to $801 millionnet cash used in operating activities of $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006,2009. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 included a positive impact of $148 million related to CIEs compared to a negative impact of $453 million in the prior year. In 2009, operating cash flows were reduced by $1.9 billion due to a decrease in net cash collateral held related to derivative instruments compared to an increase of $77 million.$111 million in 2010. The decreaseincrease in operating cash compared to the prior year was primarilyalso driven by a $100 million settlement paid in 2007.higher fee revenue, partially offset by higher advisor compensation.

Investing Activities

Our investing activities primarily relate to our Available-for-Sale investment portfolio. Further, this activity is significantly affected by the net outflowsflows of our investment certificate, fixed annuity and universal lifeUL products reflected in financing activities.

Net cash provided byused in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $15 million compared to $4.6$1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007, a cash flow decrease of $4.6 billion. Purchases of Available-for-Sale securities increased $1.9 billion and sales of2011 compared to $734 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Cash used to purchase Available-for-Sale securities decreased $3.2 billion$266 million compared to the prior year period, resulting in a $5.1 billion decrease toand cash provided by investing activities. We also paid cash of $563 million for acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2008, net of cash acquired. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.0 billion increase inproceeds from sales and maturities, sinking fund payments and calls of Available-for-Sale securities decreased $1.8 billion compared to the prior year period.year. We paid cash of $866 million for the Columbia Management Acquisition in 2010 and received cash of $150 million in 2011 for the sale of Securities America.

Net cash provided byused in investing activities decreased $5.6 billion to $734 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $4.6 billion2010 compared to $3.5$6.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006,2009, primarily due to a cash flow improvement of $1.1 billion. Net cash proceeds from Available-for-Sale securities increased $1.8$10.3 billion compared to the prior year period. This increasedecrease in cash wasused for purchases of Available-for-Sale securities, partially offset by neta $3.6 billion reduction in proceeds from sales and maturities, sinking fund payments and calls of Available-for-Sale securities. We also paid cash provided byof $866 million for the acquisition of bank deposits and loansColumbia Management Acquisition in 2006.2010.


Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $429 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $4.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase in cash of $4.7 billion. Cash proceeds from additions of investment certificates and banking time deposits increased $1.9 billion, primarily due to an increase in sales of investment certificates as a result of the market environment, as well as a sales promotion we began in April 2008. Net cash from policyholder and contractholder account values increased $2.9 billion from the prior year period primarily due to $2.2 billion of lower net outflows in fixed annuities as a result of the market environment and sales initiatives. Cash used for the repurchase of our common stock decreased $351 million compared to the prior year period due to fewer shares repurchased in 2008 at a lower average price. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we temporarily suspended our stock repurchase program in light of the current market environment. Cash provided by other banking deposits decreased $520 million due to lower Ameriprise Bank activity in 2008.

Net cash used in financing activities was $4.3$1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 20072011 compared to $4.1$1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006, a decrease2010. Net cash inflows related to policyholder and contractholder account values were $106 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to net cash outflows of $228 million.$1.1 billion for the prior year. Net cash outflows related to policyholder and contractholder account values in the prior year included net transfers to separate accounts of $1.3 billion primarily due to the implementation of changes to the Portfolio Navigator program. Cash outflows related to investment certificates and banking time deposits decreased $472 million due to lower maturities, withdrawals and cash surrenders compared to the prior year. Cash provided by other banking deposits increased $368 million compared to the prior year. Net cash inflows related to changes in repurchase agreements decreased $290 million compared to the prior year. Cash proceeds from issuance of debt, net of issuance costs, was $744 million in 2010 compared to nil in 2011. Cash used for the repurchase of our common stock increased $511$913 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2006. Cash proceedsthe prior year.

Net cash used in financing activities was $1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $4.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009. Net cash outflows related to policyholder and contractholder account values were $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to net cash inflows of $3.1 billion for the prior year primarily due to a decrease in fixed annuity deposits and the transfer of general account assets to separate accounts from the issuanceimplementation of debtchanges to the Portfolio Navigator program. Proceeds from sales of investment certificates and banking time deposits decreased $516 million, partially offset by a $230 million reduction in principal repayments of debt$1.4 billion compared to the prior year period. The changeprimarily due to the run-off of certificate rate promotions, partially offset by a $1.3 billion decrease in maturities, withdrawals and cash surrenders. Cash provided by other banking deposits resulted in an increase indecreased $345 million compared to the prior year. Cash received due to issuance of debt, net of repayments, increased $449 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the prior year. In 2010, net cash received related to repurchase agreements was $397 million. In 2009, we received cash of $614$869 million as a resultfrom the issuance of higher Ameriprise Bank activity in 2007.common stock. Cash used for the repurchase of common stock increased $571 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the prior year.

Contractual Commitments

The contractual obligations identified in the table below include both our on and off-balance sheet transactions that represent material expected or contractually committed future obligations. Payments due by period as of December 31, 2008 are2011 were as follows:

 
  
 Payments due in year ending 
 
 Total 2009 2010-2011 2012-2013 2014 and
Thereafter
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance Sheet:

                

Debt(1)

 $2,027 $ $800 $64 $1,163 

Insurance and annuities(2)

  47,241  2,994  4,858  4,610  34,779 

Investment certificates(3)

  4,874  4,554  320     

Deferred premium options obligations(4)

  876  134  247  198  297 

Off-Balance Sheet:

                

Lease obligations

  722  113  174  133  302 

Purchase obligations(5)

  54  23  21  10   

Interest on debt(6)

  2,338  119  190  152  1,877 
            

Total

 $58,132 $7,937 $6,610 $5,167 $38,418 
            

 
 Total
 2012
 2013-2014
 2015-2016
 2017 and
Thereafter

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance Sheet:

                

Long-term debt(1)

 $2,244 $ $ $700 $1,544 

Insurance and annuities(2)

  48,653  2,582  5,587  5,834  34,650 

Investment certificates(3)

  2,771  2,554  217     

Deferred premium options(4)

  2,531  372  673  561  925 

Affordable housing partnerships(5)

  267  168  96  1  2 

Off-Balance Sheet:

                

Lease obligations

  608  97  171  134  206 

Purchase obligations(6)

  493  154  188  85  66 

Interest on long-term debt(7)

  2,273  139  278  233  1,623 
  

Total

 $59,840 $6,066 $7,210 $7,548 $39,016 
  
(1)
See Note 1413 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our long-term debt.

(2)
These scheduled payments are represented by reserves of approximately $28.8$31.2 billion at December 31, 20082011 and are based on interest credited, mortality, morbidity, lapse, surrender and premium payment assumptions. Actual payment obligations may differ if experience varies from these assumptions. Separate account liabilities have been excluded as associated contractual obligations would be met by separate account assets.

(3)
The payments due by year are based on contractual term maturities. However, contractholders have the right to redeem the investment certificates earlier and at their discretion subject to surrender charges, if any. Redemptions are most likely to occur in periods of substantial increases in interest rates.

(4)
The fair value of these deferred premium optionscommitments included on the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets was $795 million$2.4 billion as of December 31, 2008.2011. See Note 2015 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additionalmore information about our deferred premium options.

(5)
The purchase obligationAffordable housing partnership commitments are related to investments in low income housing tax credit partnerships. Call dates for the obligations presented are either date or event specific. For date specific obligations, the Company is required to fund a specific amount on a stated date provided there are no defaults under the agreement. For event specific obligations, the Company is required to fund a specific amount of its capital commitment when properties in a fund become fully stabilized. For event specific obligations, the estimated call date of these commitments is used in the table above.
(6)
Purchase obligations include the minimum contractual amounts include expected spending by period under contracts that were in effect at December 31, 2008. Total termination payments associated with2011. Many of the purchase agreements giving rise to these purchase obligations were $41 million asinclude termination clauses that may require payment of December 31, 2008.

termination fees if the agreements are terminated by the Company without cause prior to their stated expiration; however, the table reflects the amounts to be paid assuming the contracts are not terminated.
(6)(7)
Interest on debt was estimated based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2008.2011.

Table of Contents

In addition to the contractual commitments outlined in the table above, we periodically fund the employees' defined benefit plans. We contributed $72 million and $64 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, to our pension plans. In 2012, we expect to contribute $46 million to our pension plans and $2 million to our defined benefit postretirement plans. See Note 21 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Total loan funding commitments, which are not included in the table above due to uncertainty with respect to timing of future cash flows, were $734 million$2.4 billion at December 31, 2008.2011.

For additional information relating to these contractual commitments, see Note 22 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

ThereWe provide asset management services to various collateralized debt obligations and other investment products, which are sponsored by us for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. Certain of these investment entities are considered to be variable interest entities while others are considered to be voting rights entities. We consolidate certain of these investment entities. For entities that we do not consolidate, our maximum exposure to loss is our investment in the entity, which was not material as of December 31, 2011. We have been no material changes inobligation to provide further financial or other support to these structured investments nor have we provided any support to these structured investments. See Note 4 to our off-balance sheet arrangements.Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our arrangements with structured investments.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that reflect management's plans, estimates and beliefs. Actual results could differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements. The Company has made various forward-looking statements in this report. Examples of such forward-looking statements include:

statements of the Company's plans, intentions, positioning, expectations, objectives or goals, including those relating to asset flows, mass affluent and affluent client acquisition strategy, client retention and growth of our client base, financial advisor productivity, retention, recruiting and enrollments, acquisition integration, general and administrative costs,costs; consolidated tax rate, return of capital to shareholders, and excess capital position;position and financial flexibility to capture additional growth opportunities;

other statements about future economic performance, the performance of equity markets and interest rate variations and the economic performance of the United States and of global markets; and

statements of assumptions underlying such statements.

The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "optimistic," "intend," "plan," "aim," "will," "may," "should," "could," "would," "likely""likely," "forecast," "on pace," "project" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements.

Such factors include, but are not limited to:

changes in the valuations, liquidity and volatility in the interest rate, credit default, equity market, and foreign exchange environments;

changes in and the adoption of relevant accounting standards, as well as changes in the litigation and regulatory environment, including ongoing legal proceedings and regulatory actions, the frequency and extent of legal claims threatened or initiated by clients, other persons and regulators, and developments in regulation and legislation;legislation, including the rules and regulations implemented or to be implemented in connection with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act;

investment management performance and distribution partner and consumer acceptance of the Company's products;

effects of competition in the financial services industry and changes in product distribution mix and distribution channels;

changes to the company'sCompany's reputation that may arise from employee or affiliated advisor misconduct, legal or regulatory actions, improper management of conflicts of interest or otherwise;

the Company's capital structure, including indebtedness, limitations on subsidiaries to pay dividends, and the extent, manner, terms and timing of any share or debt repurchases management may effect;effect as well as the opinions of rating organizationsagencies and other analysts and the reactions of market participants or the Company's regulators, advisors, distribution partners or customers in response to any change or prospect of change in any such opinion;

changes to the availability of liquidity and the Company's credit capacity that may arise due to shifts in market conditions, the Company's credit ratings and the overall availability of credit;

Table of Contents

risks of default, capacity constraint or repricing by issuers or guarantors of investments the Company owns or by counterparties to hedge, derivative, insurance or reinsurance arrangements;arrangements or by manufacturers of products the Company distributes, experience deviations from the Company's assumptions regarding such risks, the evaluations or the prospect of changes in evaluations of any such third parties published by rating organizationsagencies or other analysts, and the reactions of other market participants or the Company's regulators, advisors, distribution partners or customers in response to any such evaluation or prospect of changes in evaluation;

with respect to VIE pooled investments the Company has determined do not require consolidation under GAAP, the Company's assessment that it does not have the power over the VIE or hold a variable interest in these investments for which the Company has the potential to receive significant benefits or to absorb significant losses;

experience deviations from the Company's assumptions regarding morbidity, mortality and persistency in certain annuity and insurance products, or from assumptions regarding market returns assumed in valuing or unlocking DAC and DSIC or market volatility underlying our hedges onthe Company's valuation and hedging of guaranteed living benefit annuity riders; or from assumptions regarding anticipated claims and losses relating to the Company's automobile and home insurance products;

changes in capital requirements that may be indicated, required or advised by regulators or rating agencies;

the impacts of the Company's efforts to improve distribution economics and to grow third-party distribution of its products;

the Company's ability to pursue and complete strategic transactions and initiatives, including acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, joint ventures and the development of new products and services;

the Company's ability to realize the financial, operating and business fundamental benefits or to obtain regulatory approvals regarding integrationintegrations we plan for the acquisitions we have completed;completed or may pursue and contract to complete in the future, as well as the amount and timing of integration expenses;

the ability and timing to realize savings and other benefits from reengineeringre-engineering and tax planning;

changes in the capital markets and competitive environments induced or resulting from the partial or total ownership or other support by central governments of certain financial services firms or financial assets; and


Table of Contents

general economic and political factors, including consumer confidence in the economy, the ability and inclination of consumers generally to invest as well as their ability to and inclination to invest in financial instruments and products other than cash and cash equivalents, the costs of products and services the Company consumes in the conduct of its business, and applicable legislation and regulation and changes therein, including tax laws, tax treaties, fiscal and central government treasury policy, and policies regarding the financial services industry and publicly-held firms, and regulatory rulings and pronouncements.

Management cautions youthe reader that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. There may also be other risks that management is unable to predict at this time that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. Management undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

InterestMarket Risk

Our primary market risk exposures are interest rate, equity price, foreign currency exchange rate and credit risk are the market risks to which we have material exposure.risk. Equity marketprice and interest rate fluctuations can have a significant impact on our results of operations, primarily due to the effects they have on the asset management and other asset-based fees we earn, the spread income generated on our annuities, banking, brokerage client cash balances, and face amount certificate products and UL insurance products, the value of DAC and DSIC assets, associated with variable annuity and variable UL products, the values of liabilities for guaranteed benefits associated with our variable annuities and the values of derivatives held to hedge these benefits.

Changes in both the equity and fixed income markets during 2008 have affected our market risk position. These changes resulted in lower asset values against which we take asset-based management and distribution fees as well as increases in our stated liabilities for variable annuity guaranteed benefits. The guaranteed benefits associated with our variable annuities are GMWB, GMAB, GMDBguaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits ("GMWB"), guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits ("GMAB"), guaranteed minimum death benefits ("GMDB") and GMIB options.guaranteed minimum income benefits ("GMIB"). Each of thethese guaranteed benefits mentioned above guarantees payouts to the annuity holder under certain specific conditions regardless of the performance of the underlying investment assets.

We continue to utilize a hedging program which attempts to match the sensitivity of the assets with the sensitivity of the liabilities. This approach works with the premise that matched sensitivities will produce a highly effective hedging result. Our comprehensive hedging program focuses mainly on first order sensitivities of assets and liabilities; Equity Market Level (Delta), Interest Rate Level (Rho) and Volatility (Vega). Additionally, various second order sensitivities are managed. We use various index options across the term structure, interest rate swaps and swaptions, total return swaps and futures to


Table of Contents

manage the risk exposures. The exposures are measured and monitored daily, and adjustments to the hedge portfolio are made as necessary.

To evaluate interest rate and equity price risk we perform sensitivity testing which measures the impact on pretax income from the sources listed below for a 12 month period following a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates andor a hypothetical 10% decline in equity markets. Due to the market conditionsprices. The interest rate risk test assumes a sudden 100 basis point parallel shift in the second half of 2008, we also performed sensitivity testing usingyield curve, with rates then staying at those levels for the next 12 months. The equity price risk test assumes a hypothetical 20% declinesudden 10% drop in equity markets.

Equity price risk includes absoluteprices, with equity prices then staying at those levels for the next 12 months. In estimating the values of variable annuity riders, equity indexed annuities, stock market levelcertificates and the associated hedge assets, we assumed no change in implied market volatility changes. The estimates of netdespite the 10% drop in equity price risk exposure presented below assume no changes in implied market volatility.prices.

The numbers below showfollowing tables present our estimate of the impact on pretax impact ofincome from these hypothetical market moves, net of hedging,movements as of December 31, 2008. DAC and DSIC changes are shown based on the impact of projecting lower profits as a result of the market declines as well as linked specifically to the changes in our variable annuity riders. Following the table is a discussion by source of risk and the portfolio management techniques and derivative instruments we use to mitigate these risks.2011:

 
 Equity Price Exposure to Pretax Income 
Equity Price Decline 10% Before Hedge Impact Hedge Impact Net Impact 
 
 (in millions)
 

Asset-based management and distribution fees

 $(94) N/A $(94)

DAC and DSIC amortization(1)

  (160) N/A  (160)

Variable annuity riders:

          
 

GMDB and GMIB

  (67) N/A  (67)
 

GMWB

  (162) 179  17 
 

GMAB

  (38) 35  (3)
 

DAC and DSIC amortization(2)

  N/A  N/A  (5)
        

Total variable annuity riders

  (267) 214  (58)
        

Equity indexed annuities

  2  (2)  

Stock market certificates

  2  (2)  
        

Total

 $(517)$210 $(312)
        


Table of Contents




 Equity Price Exposure to Pretax Income  Equity Price Exposure to Pretax Income 
Equity Price Decline 20% Before Hedge Impact Hedge Impact Net Impact 

 (in millions)
 

Asset-based management and distribution fees

 $(187) N/A $(187)

DAC and DSIC amortization(1)

 (238) N/A (238)

Variable annuity riders:

 
Equity Price Decline 10%
 Before Hedge Impact
 Hedge Impact
 Net Impact
 

GMDB and GMIB

 (116) N/A (116)  

GMWB

 (352) 371 19  (in millions)
 

GMAB

 (81) 74 (7)

DAC and DSIC amortization(2)

 N/A N/A (2)

Asset-based management and distribution fees(1)

 $(174)$4 $(170)

DAC and DSIC amortization(2)(3)

 (137)  (137)

Variable annuity riders:

 

GMDB and GMIB(3)

 (53)  (53)

GMWB

 (148) 198 50 

GMAB

 (52) 68 16 

DAC and DSIC amortization(4)

 N/A N/A (25)
         

Total variable annuity riders

Total variable annuity riders

 (549) 445 (106) (253) 266 (12)
       

Equity indexed annuities

Equity indexed annuities

 3 (3)   1 (1)  

Stock market certificates

Stock market certificates

 3 (3)   2 (2)  
         

Total

Total

 $(968)$439 $(531) $(561)$267 $(319)
         

 

 
 Interest Rate Exposure to Pretax Income 
Interest Rate Increase 100 Basis Points Before Hedge Impact Hedge Impact Net Impact 
 
 (in millions)
 

Asset-based management and distribution fees

 $(15) N/A $(15)

Variable annuity riders:

          
 

GMWB

  342  (439) (97)
 

GMAB

  64  (51) 13 
 

DAC and DSIC amortization(2)

  N/A  N/A  51 
        

Total variable annuity riders

  406  (490) (33)
        

Fixed annuities, fixed portion of variable annuities and fixed insurance products

  (3) N/A  (3)

Flexible savings and other fixed rate savings products

  3  N/A  3 
        

Total

 $391 $(490)$(48)
        

 
 Interest Rate Exposure to Pretax Income 
Interest Rate Increase 100 Basis Points
 Before Hedge Impact
 Hedge Impact
 Net Impact
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Asset-based management and distribution fees(1)

 $(36)$ $(36)

Variable annuity riders:

          

GMWB

  544  (580) (36)

GMAB

  51  (52) (1)

DAC and DSIC amortization(4)

  N/A  N/A  10 
  

Total variable annuity riders

  595  (632) (27)

Fixed annuities, fixed portion of variable annuities

          

and fixed insurance products

  22    22 

Brokerage client cash balances

  86    86 

Flexible savings and other fixed rate savings products

  16    16 
  

Total

 $683 $(632)$61 
  

N/A Not Applicable.

(1)
Excludes incentive income which is impacted by market and fund performance during the period and cannot be readily estimated.
(2)
Market impact on DAC and DSIC amortization resulting from lower projected profits.

(2)(3)
In estimating the impact on DAC and DSIC amortization resulting from lower projected profits, we have not changed our assumed equity asset growth rates. This is a significantly more conservative estimate than if we assumed management follows its mean reversion guideline and increased near-term rates to recover the drop in equity values over a five-year period. We make this same conservative assumption in estimating the impact from GMDB and GMIB riders.
(4)
Market impact on DAC and DSIC amortization related to variable annuity riders is modeled net of hedge impact.

The above results compare to an estimated negative impactsnet impact to pretax income of $9$326 million related to a 10% equity price decline and an estimated positive net impact to pretax income of $11 million related to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates and $141 million related to a 10% equity market decline as of December 31, 2007.2010. The larger impactchange in 2008interest rate sensitivity at December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year is primarily due to a decrease in interest rates.

Net impacts shown in the above table from GMWB and GMAB riders result of market dislocation in 2008largely from differences between the liability valuation basis and changesthe hedging basis. Liabilities are valued using fair value accounting principles, with key policyholder behavior assumptions loaded to our valuation models. Theprovide risk margins and with discount rates and credit spreads we useincreased to value certainreflect a current market estimate of our investments have been negatively impacted by the current market. This has ledrisk of nonperformance specific to greater pretax loss projections related to ourthese liabilities. For variable annuity riders partially offset byintroduced prior to mid-2009, management elected to hedge based on best estimate policyholder behavior assumptions. For riders issued since mid-2009, management has been hedging on a lower impactbasis that includes risk margins related to our asset based management and distribution fees, primarily as a resultpolicyholder behavior. The nonperformance spread risk is not hedged.


Table of lower asset values. In addition, management's action to constrain the near term growth rate for equities in the DAC models results in a greater pretax loss under the above equity scenarios.Contents

Actual results could differ materially from those illustrated above as they are based on a number of estimates and assumptions. These include assuming the composition of invested assets and liabilitiesthat implied market volatility does not change when equity prices fall by 10%, that management does not increase assumed equity asset growth rates to anticipate recovery of the drop in equity values when valuing DAC, DSIC and GMDB and GMIB liability values and that the 12 month period following the hypothetical market decline, that there are no changes in implied market volatility and the100 basis point increase in interest rates producesis a parallel shift inof the yield curve. Furthermore, we have not tried to anticipate changes in client preferences for different types of assets or other changes in client behavior, nor have we tried to anticipate actions management might take to increase revenues or reduce expenses in these scenarios.

The selection of a 100 basis point interest rate increase as well as a 10% and 20% equity market declinesprice decline should not be construed as a prediction of future market events. Impacts of larger or smaller changes in interest rates or equity prices may not be proportional to those shown for a 100 basis point increase in interest rates or a 10% decline in equity prices.

Asset-Based Management and Distribution Fees

We earn asset-based management fees and distribution fees on our owned separate account assets and certain of our managed assets.under management. At December 31, 2008,2011, the value of theseour assets under management was $44.7 billion and $200 billion, respectively. We also earn distribution fees


Table of Contents


on our managed assets.$527.6 billion. These sources of revenue are subject to both interest rate and equity price risk since the value of these assets and the fees they earn fluctuate inversely with interest rates and directly with equity prices. We do not currently hedge the interest rate or equity price risk of this exposure.

DAC and DSIC Amortization

For annuity and universal lifeUL products, DAC and DSIC are amortized on the basis of estimated gross profits. Estimated gross profits are a proxy for pretax income prior to the recognition of DAC and DSIC amortization expense. When events occur that reduce or increase current period estimated gross profits, DAC and DSIC amortization expense is typically reduced or increased as well, somewhat mitigating the impact of the event on pretax income.

Variable Annuity Riders

The guaranteed benefits associated with our variable annuities are GMWB, GMAB, GMDB and GMIB options. Each of the guaranteed benefits mentioned above guarantees payouts to the annuity holder under certain specific conditions regardless of the performance of the underlying assets.

The total contract value of all variable annuity contracts has decreased from $57.2annuities at December 31, 2011 was $62.3 billion compared to $62.6 billion at December 31, 2007 to $43.3 billion at December 31, 2008.2010. These contract values include GMWB and GMAB contracts which have decreased from $13.1were $27.6 billion and $2.3$3.5 billion, respectively, at December 31, 20072011, compared to $12.7$24.7 billion and $2.0$3.5 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2008, respectively.2010. At December 31, 2008, the2011, reserves for the GMWB and GMAB were $1.5$1.4 billion and $367$237 million, respectively, compared to reserves of $136$337 million and $33$104 million, respectively, at December 31, 2007, respectively.2010. The increase in the reserves for the GMWB and GMAB reflect the changes in economic factors impacting the mark-to-market value of the guarantees.guarantees and increased volume of business. At December 31, 2008,2011, the reserve for the other variable annuity guaranteed benefits, GMDB and GMIB, was $67$14 million compared to $27$13 million at December 31, 2007.

As a means of economically hedging our obligations under GMWB and GMAB provisions, we purchase equity put and call options, enter into interest rate swaps, swaptions and trade equity futures contracts. See Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on derivative instruments.2010.

Equity Price Risk—Risk — Variable Annuity Riders

The variable annuity guaranteed benefits guarantee payouts to the annuity holder under certain specific conditions regardless of the performance of the investment assets. For this reason, when equity marketsprices decline, the returns from the separate account assets coupled with guaranteed benefit fees from annuity holders may not be sufficient to fund expected payouts. In that case, reserves must be increased with a negative impact to earnings.

The core derivative instruments with which we hedge the equity price risk of our GMWB and GMAB provisions are longer dated put and call derivatives; these core instruments are supplemented with equity futures and total return swaps. See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our derivative instruments.

Interest Rate Risk—Risk — Variable Annuity Riders

The GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with the GMWB provisions create embedded derivatives which are carried at fair value separately from the underlying host variable annuity contract. Changes in the fair value of the GMWB and GMAB liabilities are recorded through earnings with fair value calculated based on projected, discounted cash flows over the life of the contract, including projected, discounted benefits and fees. Increases in interest rates reduce the fair value of the GMWB and GMAB liabilities. The GMWB and GMAB interest rate exposure is hedged with a portfolio of longer dated put and call derivatives, interest rate swaps and swaptions. These derivatives are an alternative to the more customized equity puts we previously used. We have entered into interest rate swaps according to risk exposures along maturities, thus creating both fixed rate payor and variable rate payor terms. If interest rates were to increase, we would have to pay more to the swap counterparty, and the fair value of our equity puts would decrease, resulting in a negative impact to our pretax income.

Fixed Annuities, Fixed Portion of Variable Annuities and Fixed Insurance Products

Interest rate exposures arise primarily with respect to the fixed account portion of annuity and insurance products of RiverSource Life companies and their investment portfolios. We guarantee an interest rate to the holders of these products. Premiums and deposits collected from clients are primarily invested in fixed rate securities to fund the client credited rate with the spread between the rate earned from investments and the rate credited to clients recorded as earned income. Client liabilities and investment assets generally differ as it relates to basis, repricing or maturity characteristics. Rates credited to clients' accounts generally reset at shorter intervals than the yield on the underlying investments. Therefore, in an increasing


Table of Contents


investments. Therefore, in an increasing interest rate environment, higher interest rates are reflected in crediting rates to clients sooner than in rates earned on invested assets resulting in a reduced spread between the two rates, reduced earned income and a negative impact on pretax income. We had $26.8Of the $31.7 billion in reserves in future policy benefits and claims on our Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at December 31, 20082011, $29.5 billion related to recognize liabilities created by these products. As of December 31, 2008, we didWe do not hedge this exposure. As of December 31, 2007, we hedged part of this exposure through

Brokerage Client Cash Balances

We pay interest on certain brokerage client cash balances and have the use of swaptions. As of December 31, 2007,ability to reset these rates from time to time based on prevailing economic and business conditions. We earn revenue to fund the outstanding derivatives were not significant.interest paid from interest-earning assets or fees from off-balance sheet deposits at FDIC insured institutions, which are indexed to short-term interest rates. In general, the change in interest paid lags the change in revenues earned.

Flexible Savings and Other Fixed Rate Savings Products

We have interest rate risk from our flexible savings and other fixed rate savings products. These products are primarily investment certificates generally ranging in amounts from $1,000 to $1 million with interest crediting rate terms ranging from three to 36 months, as well as other savings products sold through Ameriprise Bank. We guarantee an interest rate to the holders of these products. Payments collected from clients are primarily invested in fixed rate securities to fund the client credited rate with the spread between the rate earned from investments and the rate credited to clients recorded as earned income. Client liabilities and investment assets generally differ as it relates to basis, repricing or maturity characteristics. Rates credited to clients generally reset at shorter intervals than the yield on underlying investments. This exposure is not currently hedged although we monitor our investment strategy and make modifications based on our changing liabilities and the expected interest rate environment. AtOf the $9.9 billion in customer deposits at December 31, 2008, we had $3.92011, $2.0 billion inrelated to reserves related tofor our fixed rate certificate products and $1.4$4.7 billion inrelated to reserves related tofor our banking products.

Equity Indexed Annuities

Our equity indexed annuity product is a single premium annuity issued with an initial term of seven years. The annuity guarantees the contractholder a minimum return of 3% on 90% of the initial premium or end of prior term accumulation value upon renewal plus a return that is linked to the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The equity-linked return is based on a participation rate initially set at between 50% and 90% of the S&P 500 Index, which is guaranteed for the initial seven-year term when the contract is held to full term. Of the $29.3 billion in future policy benefits and claims atAt December 31, 2008, $2442011, we had $60 million relatesin reserves related to the liabilities created by this product. In 2007, weequity indexed annuities. We discontinued new sales of equity indexed annuities. See Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on derivative instruments.annuities in 2007.

Equity Price Risk—Risk — Equity Indexed Annuities

The equity-linked return to investors creates equity price risk as the amount credited depends on changes in equity markets.prices. To hedge this exposure, a portion of the proceeds from the sale of equity indexed annuities is used towe purchase futures, calls and puts which generate returns to replicate what we must credit to client accounts. In conjunction with purchasing puts we also write puts. Pairing purchased puts with written puts allows us to better match the characteristics of the liability.

Interest Rate Risk—Risk — Equity Indexed Annuities

Most of the proceeds received from the sale of equity indexed annuities are invested in fixed income securities with the return on those investments intended to fund the 3% guarantee. We earn income from the difference between the return earned on invested assets and the 3% guarantee rate credited to customer accounts. The spread between return earned and amount credited is affected by changes in interest rates.

Indexed Universal Life

In 2011, we began offering IUL insurance. IUL is similar to UL in that it provides life insurance coverage and cash value that increases as a result of credited interest. Also, like UL, there is a minimum guaranteed credited rate of interest. Unlike UL the rate of credited interest above the minimum guarantee is linked to the S&P 500 Index (subject to a cap). At December 31, 2011, we had $7 million in reserves related to the index account of IUL. The equity-linked return to investors creates equity price risk as the amount credited depends on changes in equity prices. To hedge this exposure, a portion of the proceeds from the sale of IUL is used to purchase call spreads which generate returns to replicate what we must credit to client accounts. The estimate of the impact on pretax income for a hypothetical 10% equity market movement as of December 31, 2011 is not material.

Stock Market Certificates

Stock market certificates are purchased for amounts generally from $1,000 to $1 million for terms of 52 weeks which can be extended to a maximum of 20 years. For each term the certificate holder can choose to participate 100% in any percentage increase in the S&P 500 Index up to a maximum return or choose partial participation in any increase in the S&P 500 Index plus a fixed rate of interest guaranteed in advance. If partial participation is selected, the total of equity-linked return and guaranteed rate of interest cannot exceed the maximum return. Reserves for our stock market


Table of Contents

certificates are included in customer deposits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Of the $8.2 billion in customer deposits atAt December 31, 2008, $9142011, we had $737 million pertainin reserves related to stock market certificates.

Equity Price Risk—Risk — Stock Market Certificates

As with the equity indexed annuities, the equity-linked return to investors creates equity price risk exposure. We seek to minimize this exposure with purchased futures and call spreads that replicate what we must credit to client accounts. See Note 20This risk continues to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on derivative instruments.


Table of Contentsbe fully hedged.

Interest Rate Risk—Risk — Stock Market Certificates

Stock market certificates have some interest rate risk as changes in interest rates affect the fair value of the payout to be made to the certificate holder. This risk is not currently hedged.

Foreign Currency Risk

We have foreign currency risk through our net investment in foreign subsidiaries and our operations in foreign countries. We are primarily exposed to changes in British Pounds ("GBP") related to our net investment in Threadneedle, which had $438was 450 million of GBP exposure at December 31, 2008.2011. Our primary exposure related to operations in foreign countries is to the GBP and the Indian Rupee. We monitor the foreign exchange rates that we have exposure to and enter into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate risk when economically prudent. At December 31, 2008,2011, the notional value of outstanding contracts and our remaining foreign currency risk related to operations in foreign countries were not material.

Interest Rate Risk on External Debt

Interest rate risk on our external debt is not material. The stated interest rate on the $1.5$2.0 billion of our senior unsecured notes is fixed and the stated interest rate on the $457$294 million of junior notes is fixed until June 1, 2016. In 2010, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert the fixed interest rate on $1.4 billion of the senior unsecured notes to floating interest rates based on six-month LIBOR. We have floating ratehedged the debt of $6 million relatedin part to better align the interest expense on debt with the interest earned on cash equivalents held on our municipal bond inverse floater certificates which is not hedged but on which theConsolidated Balance Sheets. The net interest rate risk to pretax incomeof these items is not material. We have floating rate debt of $64 million related to certain consolidated property funds, a portion of which is hedged using interest rate swaps which effectively convert the floating rates to a fixed rate.immaterial.

Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit risk within our investment portfolio, which includes loans,including our loan portfolio, and through our derivative and reinsurance counterparties.activities. Credit risk relates to the uncertainty of an obligor's continued ability to make timely payments in accordance with the contractual terms of the financial instrument or contract. OurWe consider our total potential derivative credit exposure to each counterparty is aggregated with all of our other exposuresand its affiliates to the counterparty to determineensure compliance with establishedpre-established credit guidelines at the time we enter into a derivative transaction. We managetransaction which would potentially increase our credit risk through fundamental credit analysis, issuer and industry concentration guidelines, and diversification requirements.risk. These guidelines and oversight of credit risk are managed through oura comprehensive enterprise risk management program that includes members of senior management.

We manage the risk of adverse default experience on these investmentscredit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties by applying disciplined fundamental credit analysis and underwriting standards, prudently limiting exposures to lower-quality, higher-yielding investments, and diversifying exposures by issuer, industry, region and propertyunderlying investment type. For each counterparty or borrowing entity and its affiliates, our exposures from all types of transactions are aggregated and managed in relation to guidelines set by risk tolerance thresholds and external and internal rating quality. We remain exposed to occasional adverse cyclical economic downturns during which default rates may be significantly higher than the long-term historical average used in pricing.

Credit exposuresWe manage our credit risk related to over-the-counter derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties, maintaining collateral arrangements and through the use of master netting arrangements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty to another at each due date and upon termination. Generally, our current credit exposure on over-the-counter derivative contracts may takeis limited to a derivative counterparty's net positive fair value of derivative contracts after taking into accountconsideration the existence of netting arrangements and any collateral arrangements. Before executing a new type of structure of derivative contract, we determine the variability of the contract's potentialreceived. This exposure is monitored and managed to an acceptable threshold level.

Because exchange-traded futures are effected through regulated exchanges and positions are marked to market and credit exposures and whether such variability might reasonably be expected to creategenerally cash settled on a daily basis, we have minimal exposure to a counterpartycredit-related losses in excessthe event of established limits.nonperformance by counterparties to such derivative instruments.

Additionally, we reinsure a portion of the insurance risks associated withWe manage our life, disability income, long term care and auto and home insurance products throughcredit risk related to reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. Reinsurance is used in order to limit losses, reduce exposure to large risks and provide additional capacity for future growth. To manage exposure to losses from reinsurer insolvencies,treaties by evaluating the financial condition of reinsurers is evaluatedreinsurance counterparties prior to entering into new reinsurance treaties and on a periodic basistreaties. In addition, we regularly evaluate their financial strength during the terms of the treaties. Our insurance companies remain primarily liable as the direct insurers on all risks reinsured. As of December 31, 2008,2011, our largest reinsurance credit risk is related to a long term care coinsurance arrangement between us and atreaty with life insurance subsidiarysubsidiaries of Genworth Financial, Inc. See Note 107 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for furtheradditional information on reinsurance.


Table of Contents


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Consolidated Financial Statements:

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirms

 82
98

Consolidated Statements of Operations—Operations — Years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009

 83
100

Consolidated Balance Sheets—Sheets — December 31, 20082011 and 20072010

 84
101

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Flows — Years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009

 85
102

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity—Equity — Years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009

 87
103

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 88
104

Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statement of operations, equity, and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 2012


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2008.2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. at December 31, 2008 and 2007,2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2008,2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Ameriprise Financial, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in 20082010 the Company adopted Statementnew accounting guidance related to the consolidation of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.variable interest entities. Also, in 2009 the Company adopted new accounting guidance related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments.

As discussed in Note 3, in 200724 to the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,consolidated financial statements, the accompanying 2010 and American Institute2009 financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted to reclassify the assets, liabilities and results of Certified Public Accountants Statementoperations of Position 05-1, Accounting by Insurance Enterprisesa certain subsidiary as discontinued operations.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 28, 2011, except for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts.Note 24 (Discontinued Operations), as to which the date is February 24, 2012


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 2, 2009



Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Operations
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
 

Revenues

          
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $2,899 $3,238 $2,700 
 

Distribution fees

  1,565  1,762  1,569 
 

Net investment income

  828  2,018  2,225 
 

Premiums

  1,091  1,063  1,070 
 

Other revenues

  766  724  707 
        
  

Total revenues

  7,149  8,805  8,271 
 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  179  249  245 
        
  

Total net revenues

  6,970  8,556  8,026 
        

Expenses

          
 

Distribution expenses

 $1,948 $2,057 $1,728 
 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  790  847  955 
 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,125  1,179  1,132 
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  933  551  472 
 

Interest and debt expense

  109  112  101 
 

Separation costs

    236  361 
 

General and administrative expense

  2,436  2,558  2,480 
        

Total expenses

  7,341  7,540  7,229 
        

Pretax income (loss)

  (371) 1,016  797 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  (333) 202  166 
        

Net income (loss)

 $(38)$814 $631 
        

Earnings (loss) per common share

          
 

Basic

 $(0.17)$3.45 $2.56 
 

Diluted

  (0.17(1) 3.39  2.54 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

          
 

Basic

  222.3  236.2  246.5 
 

Diluted

  224.9  239.9  248.5 

Cash dividends paid per common share

 
$

0.64
 
$

0.56
 
$

0.44
 
(1)
Diluted shares used in this calculation represent basic shares due to the net loss. The use of actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


Consolidated Balance Sheets
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions, except share data)
 

Assets

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $6,228 $3,836 

Investments

  27,522  30,625 

Separate account assets

  44,746  61,974 

Receivables

  3,887  3,441 

Deferred acquisition costs

  4,482  4,503 

Restricted and segregated cash

  1,883  1,332 

Other assets

  6,928  3,519 
      
  

Total assets

 $95,676 $109,230 
      

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

       

Liabilities:

       

Future policy benefits and claims

 $29,293 $27,446 

Separate account liabilities

  44,746  61,974 

Customer deposits

  8,229  6,206 

Debt

  2,027  2,018 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  887  1,187 

Other liabilities

  4,316  2,589 
      
 

Total liabilities

  89,498  101,420 
      

Shareholders' Equity:

       

Common shares ($.01 par value; shares authorized, 1,250,000,000; shares issued, 256,432,623 and 255,925,436, respectively)

  3  3 

Additional paid-in capital

  4,688  4,630 

Retained earnings

  4,592  4,811 

Treasury shares, at cost (39,921,924 and 28,177,593 shares, respectively)

  (2,012) (1,467)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

       
 

Net unrealized securities losses

  (961) (168)
 

Net unrealized derivatives losses

  (8) (6)
 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  (85) (19)
 

Defined benefit plans

  (39) 26 
      

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (1,093) (167)
      

Total shareholders' equity

  6,178  7,810 
      

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $95,676 $109,230 
      
 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
 

Revenues

          

Management and financial advice fees

 $4,537 $3,784 $2,558 

Distribution fees

  1,573  1,447  1,182 

Net investment income

  2,046  2,309  1,998 

Premiums

  1,220  1,179  1,098 

Other revenues

  863  863  702 
  

Total revenues

  10,239  9,582  7,538 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  47  70  141 
  

Total net revenues

  10,192  9,512  7,397 
  

Expenses

          

Distribution expenses

  2,497  2,065  1,462 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  853  909  903 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,557  1,750  1,334 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  618  127  217 

Interest and debt expense

  317  290  127 

General and administrative expense

  2,965  2,737  2,434 
  

Total expenses

  8,807  7,878  6,477 
  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

  1,385  1,634  920 

Income tax provision

  355  350  184 
  

Income from continuing operations

  1,030  1,284  736 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (60) (24) 1 
  

Net income

  970  1,260  737 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106) 163  15 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $1,076 $1,097 $722 
  

Earnings per share attributable to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common shareholders

          

Basic

          

Income from continuing operations

 $4.71 $4.36 $2.98 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (0.25) (0.10)  
  

Net income

 $4.46 $4.26 $2.98 
  

Diluted

          

Income from continuing operations

 $4.61 $4.27 $2.95 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (0.24) (0.09)  
  

Net income

 $4.37 $4.18 $2.95 
  

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $1.15 $0.71 $0.68 

Supplemental Disclosures:

          

Net investment income:

          

Net investment income before impairment losses on securities

 $2,080 $2,346 $2,091 
  

Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities

  (76) (41) (83)

Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income

  42  4  (10)
  

Net impairment losses recognized in net investment income

  (34) (37) (93)
  

Net investment income

 $2,046 $2,309 $1,998 
  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsBalance Sheets
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

          

Net income (loss)

 $(38)$814 $631 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

          
 

Capitalization of deferred acquisition and sales inducement costs

  (735) (895) (870)
 

Amortization of deferred acquisition and sales inducement costs

  1,054  604  520 
 

Depreciation and amortization

  204  176  148 
 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

  (409) 25  24 
 

Share-based compensation

  148  143  113 
 

Net realized investment gains

  (5) (49) (52)
 

Other-than-temporary impairments and provision for loan losses

  793  (13) 4 
 

Premiums and discount amortization

  63  110  125 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

          
 

Segregated cash

  (419) 63  (54)
 

Trading securities and equity method investments, net

  (20) 18  158 
 

Future policy benefits and claims, net

  466  84  21 
 

Receivables

  (200) (288) (270)
 

Brokerage deposits

  278  (76) (14)
 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  (507) (12) 112 

Other, net

  1,329  20  205 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  2,002  724  801 
        

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

          

Available-for-Sale securities:

          
 

Proceeds from sales

  426  3,662  2,444 
 

Maturities, sinking fund payments and calls

  3,911  2,887  3,434 
 

Purchases

  (3,603) (1,684) (2,765)

Proceeds from sales and maturities of commercial mortgage loans

  319  492  512 

Funding of commercial mortgage loans

  (109) (510) (422)

Proceeds from sale of AMEX Assurance

    115   

Proceeds from sales of other investments

  52  123  150 

Purchase of other investments

  (353) (61) (146)

Purchase of land, buildings, equipment and software

  (125) (306) (187)

Change in policy loans, net

  (25) (47) (36)

Change in restricted cash

  155  (153) (17)

Acquisitions, net of cash received

  (563)   437 

Change in consumer banking loans and credit card receivables, net

  (103) 91  22 

Other, net

  33  19  62 
        

Net cash provided by investing activities

  15  4,628  3,488 
        

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

          

Investment certificates and banking time deposits:

          
 

Proceeds from additions

 $2,742 $831 $1,947 
 

Maturities, withdrawals and cash surrenders

  (1,591) (1,777) (2,897)

Change in other banking deposits

  (1) 519  (95)

Policyholder and contractholder account values:

          
 

Consideration received

  2,913  1,093  1,267 
 

Net transfer from (to) separate accounts

  91  (50) (307)
 

Surrenders and other benefits

  (2,931) (3,838) (3,688)

Deferred premium options, net

  (77) (8)  

Proceeds from issuances of debt, net of issuance costs

  81    516 

Principal repayments of debt

  (55) (54) (284)

Dividends paid to shareholders

  (143) (133) (108)

Repurchase of common shares

  (638) (989) (478)

Exercise of stock options

  9  37  20 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

  29  37  52 

Other, net

    51  2 
        

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  429  (4,281) (4,053)
        

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

  (54) 5  41 
        

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  2,392  1,076  277 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  3,836  2,760  2,483 
        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $6,228 $3,836 $2,760 
        

Supplemental Disclosures:

          
 

Interest paid on debt

 $123 $140 $131 
 

Income taxes paid, net

  185  55  219 
 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions, except share amounts)
 

Assets

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $2,781 $2,838 

Investments

  38,775  36,755 

Separate account assets

  66,780  68,330 

Receivables

  5,559  4,849 

Deferred acquisition costs

  4,402  4,619 

Restricted and segregated cash and investments

  1,793  1,814 

Other assets

  7,468  4,965 

Assets held for sale

    173 
  

Total assets before consolidated investment entities

  127,558  124,343 
  

Consolidated Investment Entities:

       

Cash

  470  472 

Investments, at fair value

  4,789  5,444 

Receivables (includes $39 and $33, respectively, at fair value)

  59  60 

Other assets, at fair value

  1,110  895 
  

Total assets of consolidated investment entities

  6,428  6,871 
  

Total assets

 $133,986 $131,214 
  

Liabilities and Equity

       

Liabilities:

       

Future policy benefits and claims

 $31,723 $30,208 

Separate account liabilities

  66,780  68,330 

Customer deposits

  9,850  8,779 

Short-term borrowings

  504  397 

Long-term debt

  2,393  2,317 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  1,048  1,112 

Other liabilities

  5,432  2,983 

Liabilities held for sale

    79 
  

Total liabilities before consolidated investment entities

  117,730  114,205 
  

Consolidated Investment Entities:

       

Debt (includes $4,712 and $5,171, respectively, at fair value)

  5,178  5,535 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  17  22 

Other liabilities (includes $85 and $154, respectively, at fair value)

  100  167 
  

Total liabilities of consolidated investment entities

  5,295  5,724 
  

Total liabilities

  123,025  119,929 
  

Equity:

       

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.:

       

Common shares ($.01 par value; shares authorized, 1,250,000,000; shares issued, 303,757,574 and 301,366,044, respectively)

  3  3 

Additional paid-in capital

  6,237  6,029 

Retained earnings

  6,983  6,190 

Appropriated retained earnings of consolidated investment entities

  428  558 

Treasury shares, at cost (81,814,591 and 54,668,152 shares, respectively)

  (4,034) (2,620)

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

  638  565 
  

Total Ameriprise Financial, Inc. shareholders' equity

  10,255  10,725 

Noncontrolling interests

  706  560 
  

Total equity

  10,961  11,285 
  

Total liabilities and equity

 $133,986 $131,214 
  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'Cash Flows
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

          

Net income

 $970 $1,260 $737 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

          

Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net

  110  110  120 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

  61  513  (24)

Share-based compensation

  145  158  182 

Net realized investment gains

  (34) (60) (163)

Other-than-temporary impairments and provision for loan losses

  43  47  132 

Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  106  (163) (15)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities before consolidated investment entities:

          

Restricted and segregated cash and investments

  (11) (186) 245 

Deferred acquisition costs

  126  (398) (403)

Other investments, net

  48  2  301 

Future policy benefits and claims, net

  (28) 383  105 

Receivables

  (260) (441) (186)

Brokerage deposits

  225  222  (94)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  (80) 195  26 

Derivatives collateral, net

  738  111  (1,914)

Other, net

  207  (54) 86 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities of consolidated investment entities, net

  (188) 148  (453)
  

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  2,178  1,847  (1,318)
  

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

          

Available-for-Sale securities:

          

Proceeds from sales

  888  1,519  5,630 

Maturities, sinking fund payments and calls

  5,206  6,404  5,855 

Purchases

  (7,236) (7,502) (17,815)

Proceeds from sales, maturities and repayments of commercial mortgage loans

  224  226  294 

Funding of commercial mortgage loans

  (238) (154) (104)

Proceeds from sales of other investments

  360  189  75 

Purchase of other investments

  (422) (102) (14)

Purchase of investments by consolidated investment entities

  (2,871) (1,935)  

Proceeds from sales, maturities and repayments of investments by consolidated investment entities

  3,399  2,005   

Purchase of land, buildings, equipment and software

  (250) (131) (83)

Acquisitions

    (866)  

Proceeds from sale of business

  150     

Change in consumer banking loans and credit card receivables, net

  (349) (372) (218)

Other, net

  (7) (15) 7 
  

Net cash used in investing activities

  (1,146) (734) (6,373)
  

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

          

Investment certificates and banking time deposits:

          

Proceeds from additions

 $873 $1,029 $2,411 

Maturities, withdrawals and cash surrenders

  (1,243) (1,871) (3,177)

Change in other banking deposits

  1,210  842  1,187 

Policyholder and contractholder account values:

          

Consideration received

  1,378  1,593  4,863 

Net transfers from (to) separate accounts

  39  (1,337) 195 

Surrenders and other benefits

  (1,311) (1,338) (1,923)

Deferred premium options, net

  (254) (182) (82)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

      869 

Issuance of debt, net of issuance costs

    744  491 

Repayments of debt

  (20) (354) (550)

Change in short-term borrowings, net

  107  397   

Dividends paid to shareholders

  (212) (183) (164)

Repurchase of common shares

  (1,495) (582) (11)

Exercise of stock options

  66  113  6 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

  90  9  12 

Borrowings by consolidated investment entities

  163  163  234 

Repayments of debt by consolidated investment entities

  (603) (287)  

Noncontrolling interests investments in subsidiaries

  155  77  231 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  (54) (171) (45)

Other, net

    (5) (2)
  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (1,111) (1,343) 4,545 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

  (1) (6) 15 
  

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(1)

  (80) (236) (3,131)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period(1)

  2,861  3,097  6,228 
  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period(1)

 $2,781 $2,861 $3,097 
  

Supplemental Disclosures:

          

Interest paid before consolidated investment entities

 $201 $231 $251 

Income taxes paid, net

  370  61  98 

Non-cash investing activity:

          

Affordable housing partnership commitments not yet remitted

  137  188   

Non-cash financing activity:

          

Dividends declared but not paid

  62     
  
(1)
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash held for sale. See Note 24 for additional information.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Equity
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

 
 Number of
Outstanding
Shares
 Common
Shares
 Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Treasury
Shares
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total 
 
 (in millions, except share data)
 

Balances at January 1, 2006

  249,875,554 $2 $4,091 $3,745 $ $(151)$7,687 

Comprehensive income:

                      
 

Net income

        631      631 
 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

                      
  

Change in net unrealized securities losses

            (58) (58)
  

Change in net unrealized derivatives losses

            (7) (7)
  

Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax

            (3) (3)
  

Minimum pension liability adjustment

            3  3 
  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

            7  7 
                      

Total comprehensive income

                    573 

Dividends paid to shareholders

        (108)     (108)

Transfer of pension obligations and assets from American Express Retirement Plan

      (5)       (5)

Repurchase of common shares

  (11,395,306)       (490)   (490)

Share-based compensation plans

  2,911,183  1  267        268 
                

Balances at December 31, 2006

  241,391,431  3  4,353  4,268  (490) (209) 7,925 

Change in accounting principles, net of tax

        (138)     (138)

Comprehensive income:

                      
 

Net income

        814      814 
 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

                      
  

Change in net unrealized securities losses

            19  19 
  

Change in net unrealized derivatives losses

            (5) (5)
  

Change in defined benefit plans

            29  29 
  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

            (1) (1)
                      

Total comprehensive income

                    856 

Dividends paid to shareholders

        (133)     (133)

Repurchase of common shares

  (16,659,635)       (977)   (977)

Share-based compensation plans

  3,016,047    223        223 

Other, net

      54        54 
                

Balances at December 31, 2007

  227,747,843  3  4,630  4,811  (1,467) (167) 7,810 

Change in accounting principles, net of tax

        (35)     (35)

Comprehensive loss:

                      
 

Net loss

        (38)     (38)
 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

                      
  

Change in net unrealized securities losses

            (793) (793)
  

Change in net unrealized derivatives losses

            (2) (2)
  

Change in defined benefit plans

            (65) (65)
  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

            (66) (66)
                      

Total comprehensive loss

                    (964)

Dividends paid to shareholders

        (143)     (143)

Repurchase of common shares

  (13,524,349)       (638)   (638)

Share-based compensation plans

  2,287,205    58  (3) 93    148 
                

Balances at December 31, 2008

  216,510,699 $3 $4,688 $4,592 $(2,012)$(1,093)$6,178 
                

 
 Ameriprise Financial, Inc.  
  
 
 
 Number of
Outstanding
Shares

 Common
Shares

 Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 Retained
Earnings

 Appropriated
Retained
Earnings of
Consolidated
Investment
Entities

 Treasury
Shares

 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 Non-
controlling
Interests

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions, except share data)
 

Balances at January 1, 2009

  216,510,699 $3 $4,688 $4,586 $ $(2,012)$(1,091)$289 $6,463 

Change in accounting principles, net of tax

        132      (132)    

Comprehensive income:

                            

Net income

        722        15  737 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                            

Change in net unrealized securities losses

              1,354    1,354 

Change in noncredit related impairments on securities and net unrealized securities losses on previously impaired securities

              49    49 

Change in net unrealized derivatives losses

              11    11 

Change in defined benefit plans

              19    19 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

              55  22  77 
                            

Total comprehensive income

                          2,247 

Issuance of common stock

  36,000,000    869            869 

Dividends to shareholders

        (164)         (164)

Noncontrolling interests investments in subsidiaries

                322  322 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

                (45) (45)

Repurchase of common shares

  (822,166)         (11)     (11)

Share-based compensation plans

  3,406,958    191            191 
  

Balances at December 31, 2009

  255,095,491  3  5,748  5,276    (2,023) 265  603  9,872 

Change in accounting principles

          473        473 

Comprehensive income:

                            

Net income

        1,097        163  1,260 

Net income reclassified to appropriated retained earnings

          85      (85)  

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                            

Change in net unrealized securities gains

              288    288 

Change in noncredit related impairments on securities and net unrealized securities losses on previously impaired securities

              17    17 

Change in net unrealized derivatives gains

              15    15 

Change in defined benefit plans

              (4)   (4)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

              (16) (27) (43)
                            

Total comprehensive income

                          1,533 

Dividends to shareholders

        (183)         (183)

Noncontrolling interests investments in subsidiaries

                77  77 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

                (171) (171)

Repurchase of common shares

  (13,924,062)         (597)     (597)

Share-based compensation plans

  5,526,463    281            281 
  

Balances at December 31, 2010

  246,697,892 $3 $6,029 $6,190 $558 $(2,620)$565 $560 $11,285 

Comprehensive income:

                            

Net income (loss)

        1,076        (106) 970 

Net loss reclassified to appropriated retained earnings

          (130)     130   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                            

Change in net unrealized securities gains

              164    164 

Change in noncredit related impairments on securities and net unrealized securities losses on previously impaired securities

              (9)   (9)

Change in net unrealized derivatives gains

              (29)   (29)

Change in defined benefit plans

              (51)   (51)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

              (2) (8) (10)
                            

Total comprehensive income

                          1,035 

Dividends to shareholders

        (274)         (274)

Noncontrolling interests investments in subsidiaries

                155  155 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

                (54) (54)

Repurchase of common shares

  (28,812,873)         (1,495)     (1,495)

Share-based compensation plans

  4,057,964    208  (9)   81    29  309 
  

Balances at December 31, 2011

  221,942,983 $3 $6,237 $6,983 $428 $(4,034)$638 $706 $10,961 
  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise Financial"), companies in which it directly or indirectly has a controlling financial interest, variable interest entities ("VIEs") in which it is the primary beneficiary and certain limited partnerships for which it is the general partner (collectively, the "Company").

Ameriprise Financial is a holding company, which primarily conducts business through its subsidiaries to provide financial planning, and products and services that are designed to be utilized as solutions for clients' cash and liquidity, asset accumulation, income, protection and estate and wealth transfer needs. The Company's foreign operations in the United Kingdomof Ameriprise Financial, Inc. are conducted primarily through its subsidiary, Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings Sàrl ("Threadneedle").

ReclassificationsThe accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Ameriprise Financial, Inc., companies in which it directly or indirectly has a controlling financial interest and variable interest entities ("VIEs") in which it is the primary beneficiary (collectively, the "Company"). The income or loss generated by consolidated entities which will not be realized by the Company's shareholders is attributed to noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Noncontrolling interests are the ownership interests in subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and are classified as equity within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company excluding noncontrolling interests is defined as "Ameriprise Financial." All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. See Note 2 and Note 4 for additional information related to VIEs.

The results of Securities America Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, "Securities America") have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the related assets and liabilities have been classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2010. See Note 24 for additional information on discontinued operations, including the sale of Securities America in the fourth quarter of 2011.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Certain reclassifications of prior yearperiod amounts have been made to conform to the current presentation. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified the changes in fair value of certain derivatives from net investment income to various expense lines where the changes in fair value of the related embedded derivatives reside. The changes in fair value of derivatives hedging variable annuity living benefits, equity indexed annuities and stock market certificates were reclassified to benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, interest credited to fixed accounts and banking and deposit interest expense, respectively.

The following table shows the impact of the reclassification made to the Company's previously reported Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 
 Year Ended
December 31, 2007
 Year Ended
December 31, 2006
 
 
 Previously
Reported
 Reclassified Previously
Reported
 Reclassified 
 
 (in millions)
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

             

Management and financial advice fees

 $3,238 $3,238 $2,700 $2,700 

Distribution fees

  1,762  1,762  1,569  1,569 

Net investment income

  2,122  2,018  2,247  2,225 

Premiums

  1,063  1,063  1,070  1,070 

Other revenues

  724  724  707  707 
          
 

Total revenues

  8,909  8,805  8,293  8,271 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  255  249  273  245 
          
 

Total net revenues

  8,654  8,556  8,020  8,026 
          

Expenses

             

Distribution expenses

  2,057  2,057  1,728  1,728 

Interest credited to fixed accounts

  850  847  968  955 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

  1,274  1,179  1,113  1,132 

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  551  551  472  472 

Interest and debt expense

  112  112  101  101 

Separation costs

  236  236  361  361 

General and administrative expense

  2,558  2,558  2,480  2,480 
          
 

Total expenses

  7,638  7,540  7,223  7,229 
          

Pretax income

  1,016  1,016  797  797 

Income tax provision

  202  202  166  166 
          

Net income

 $814 $814 $631 $631 
          

The Company has reclassified certain prior year balances inevaluated events or transactions that may have occurred after the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows related to consumer banking loans and credit card receivables. The Company previously classifiedbalance sheet date for potential recognition or disclosure through the change in these balances as an operatingdate the financial statements were issued.


Table of Contents


activity in its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company has reclassified the net of origination and principal collection of consumer banking loans and credit card receivables as an investing activity in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 95 "Statement of Cash Flows" and SFAS No. 104 "Statement of Cash Flows—Net Reporting of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and Classification of Cash Flows from Hedging Transactions."

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The Company consolidates all entities in which it holds a greater than 50% voting interest, or when certain conditions are met for VIEs and limited partnerships, except for immaterial seed money investments in mutual funds, which are accounted for as trading securities.partnerships. Entities in which the Company exercises significant influence or holds a greater than 20% but less than 50% voting interest are accounted for under the equity method. Additionally, other investments in hedge funds in which the Company holds an interest that is less than 50% are accounted for under the equity method. All other investments that are not reported at fair value as trading or Available-for-Sale securities are accounted for under the cost method where the Company owns less than a 20% voting interest and does not exercise significant influence.

The Company consolidates all VIEsA VIE is an entity that either has equity investors that lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest (including substantive voting rights, the obligation to absorb the entity's losses, or the rights to receive the entity's returns) or has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for which itthe entity to support its activities. A VIE is consideredrequired to be assessed for consolidation under two models:

If the primary beneficiary. The determination asVIE is a money market fund or is an investment company, or has the financial characteristics of an investment company, and the following is true:

(i)
the entity does not have an explicit or implicit obligation to whetherfund the investment company's losses; and

(ii)
the investment company is not a securitization entity, asset backed financing entity, or an entity isformally considered a qualifying special purpose entity,
If the entity. The Company also considers other characteristics such asVIE does not meet the ability to influencecriteria above, the decision making about the entity's activities and howVIE will be consolidated by the entity is financed. The determination asthat determines it has both:

(i)
the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance; and

(ii)
the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Table of Contents

When determining whether the Company is consideredstands to beabsorb the primary beneficiary is based onmajority of a VIE's expected losses or receive a majority of a VIE's expected returns, it analyzes the design of the VIE to identify the variable interests it holds. Then the Company quantitatively determines whether its variable interests will absorb a majority of the VIE's variability. If the Company determines it has control over the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and it will absorb a majority of the VIE's expected losses, receive a majorityvariability, the Company consolidates the VIE. The calculation of variability is based on an analysis of projected probability-weighted cash flows based on the design of the particular VIE. When determining whether the Company has the power and the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant, the Company qualitatively determines if its variable interests meet these criteria. If the Company consolidates a VIE under either scenario, it is referred to as the VIE's expected residual return or both. See Note 6 for additional information about the Company's VIEs.primary beneficiary.

The Company consolidates certain limited partnerships that are not VIEs, for which the Company is the general partner and is determined to control the limited partnership. As a general partner, the Company is presumed to control the limited partnership unless the limited partners have the ability to dissolve the partnership or have substantive participating rights.

All material intercompany transactions and balances between or among Ameriprise Financial and its subsidiaries and affiliates have been eliminated in consolidation.

Foreign Currency Translation

Net assets of foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, are translated into U.S. dollars based upon exchange rates prevailing at the end of each year. The resulting translation adjustment, along with any related hedge and tax effects, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the year.

Amounts Based on Estimates and Assumptions

Accounting estimates are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements. In part, they are based upon assumptions concerning future events. Among the more significant are those that relate to investment securities valuation and recognition of other-than-temporary impairments, valuation of deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") and the corresponding recognition of DAC amortization, derivative instruments and hedging activities, litigation and claims reserves and income taxes and the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. These accounting estimates reflect the best judgment of management and actual results could differ.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include time deposits and other highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Investments

Investments consist of the following:

Available-for-Sale Securities

Available-for-Sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains (losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of impacts to DAC, deferred sales inducement costs ("DSIC"), certain benefit reserves and income tax provision (benefit)taxes. Gains and losses are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations upon disposition of the securities.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company early adopted an accounting standard that significantly changed the Company's accounting policy regarding the timing and amount of other-than-temporary impairments for Available-for-Sale securities as follows. When the fair value of an investment is less than its amortized cost, the Company assesses whether or not: (i) it has the intent to sell the security (made a decision to sell) or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and the Company must recognize an other-than-temporary impairment for the difference between the investment's amortized cost basis and its fair value through earnings. For securities that do not meet the above criteria, and the Company does not expect to recover a security's amortized cost basis, the security is also considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these securities, the Company separates the total impairment into the credit loss component and the amount of the loss related to other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairments related to credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairments related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of adjustmentsimpacts to DAC, DSIC, certain benefit reserves and income taxes. For Available-for-Sale securities that have recognized an other-than-temporary impairment through earnings, if through subsequent evaluation there is a sustained increase in the cash flow expected, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income. Subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of Available-for-Sale securities are included in other asset and liability balances, such as DAC, to reflect the expected impactcomprehensive income (loss). The Company's Consolidated Statements of Equity present all changes in other comprehensive income (loss) associated with Available-for-Sale debt securities that have been other-than-temporarily impaired on their carrying values had the unrealized gains (losses) been realizeda separate line from fair value changes recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) from all other securities.


Table of Contents


asThe Company provides a supplemental disclosure on the face of its Consolidated Statements of Operations that presents: (i) total other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized during the respective balance sheet date. Gainsperiod and (ii) the portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses are recognized in consolidated resultsother comprehensive income (loss). The sum of operations upon dispositionthese amounts represents the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairments that were recognized in earnings during the securities. In addition,period. The portion of other-than-temporary losses are also recognized when management determines that a decline in value isother comprehensive income (loss) includes: (i) the portion of other-than-temporary which requires judgment regardingimpairment losses related to factors other than credit recognized during the amountperiod and timing(ii) reclassifications of recovery. The Company regularly reviews Available-for-Sale securities for impairments in value consideredother-than-temporary impairment losses previously determined to be other-than-temporary. The cost basis of securitiesrelated to factors other than credit that are determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired is written down tocredit-related in the current period. The amount presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as the portion of other-than-temporary losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) excludes subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value withof these securities.

For all securities that are considered temporarily impaired, the Company does not intend to sell these securities (has not made a corresponding chargedecision to net income. A write-down for impairment cansell) and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be recognized for both credit-related eventsrequired to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The Company believes that it will collect all principal and for changeinterest due on all investments that have amortized cost in excess of fair value due to changes in interest rates. Once a security is written down to fair value through net income, any subsequent recovery in value cannot be recognized in net income until the principal is returned.that are considered only temporarily impaired.

Factors the Company considers in determining whether declines in the fair value of fixed-maturityfixed maturity securities are other-than-temporary include: 1)(i) the extent to which the market value is below amortized cost; 2) our ability and intent to hold the investment for a sufficient period of time for it to recover to an amount at least equal to its carrying value; 3)(ii) the duration of time in which there has been a significant decline in value; 4)(iii) fundamental analysis of the liquidity, business prospects and overall financial condition of the issuer; and 5)(iv) market events that could impact credit ratings, economic and business climate, litigation and government actions, and similar external business factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss component for corporate debt securities considered other-than-temporarily impaired, a best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected discounted at the security's effective interest rate is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. The significant inputs to cash flow projections consider potential debt restructuring terms, projected cash flows available to pay creditors and the Company's position in the debtor's overall capital structure.

For structured investments (e.g., residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities), the Company also considers factors such as overall deal structure and ourits position within the structure, quality of underlying collateral, delinquencies and defaults, loss severities, recoveries, prepayments and cumulative loss projections and discounted cash flows in assessing potential other-than-temporary impairmentimpairments of these investments. Based upon these factors, securities that have indicators of potential other-than-temporary impairment are subject to detailed review by management. Securities for which declines are considered temporary continue to be carefully monitored by management.

See Note 18 for information regarding the fair values of assets and liabilities.

Commercial Mortgage Loans, NetOther Investments

Commercial mortgage loans, netOther investments primarily reflect principal amounts outstanding less the allowanceCompany's interests in affordable housing partnerships, trading securities, seed money investments and syndicated loans. Affordable housing partnerships and seed money investments are accounted for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is measured asunder the excess of the loan's recorded investment over (i) present value of its expected principal and interest payments discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or (ii) the fair value of collateral. Additionally, the level of the allowance for loan losses considers other factors, including historical experience, economic conditions and geographic concentrations. Management regularly evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and believes it is adequate to absorb estimated losses in the portfolio.

The Company generally stops accruing interest on commercial mortgage loans for which interest payments are delinquent more than three months. Based on management's judgment as to the ultimate collectibility of principal, interest payments received are either recognized as income or applied to the recorded investment in the loan.

Trading Securities

equity method. Trading securities primarily include common stocks and trading bonds and seed money investments.bonds. Trading securities are carried at fair value with unrealized and realized gains (losses) recorded within net investment income.

Financing Receivables

PolicyCommercial Mortgage Loans, Syndicated Loans, and Consumer Bank Loans

Commercial mortgage loans are reflected within investments at amortized cost less the allowance for loan losses. Syndicated loans represent the Company's investment in below investment grade loan syndications. Syndicated loans are reflected in investments at amortized cost less the allowance for loan losses.

The Company provides consumer lending through its banking subsidiary, Ameriprise Bank, FSB ("Ameriprise Bank"). The Company's consumer lending products primarily include home equity lines of credit, first mortgage lines of credit, credit cards and other revolving lines of credit. The loans are reflected in receivables at amortized cost less the allowance for loan losses.

Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balances of the loans as earned.

Other Loans

Other loans consist of policy loans and brokerage margin loans. Policy loans include life insurance policy, annuity and investment certificate loans. These loans and are carriedreflected within investments at the aggregate ofunpaid principal balance, plus accrued interest. When originated, the unpaid loan balances which do not exceed the cash surrender valuesvalue of the underlying products, plus accrued interest.products. As there is minimal risk of loss related to policy loans, the Company does not record an allowance for loan losses for policy loans. The Company's broker dealer subsidiaries enter into lending arrangements with clients through the normal course of business, which are primarily based on customer margin levels. These balances are reported at the unpaid principal balance within receivables. The Company monitors the market value of collateral supporting the margin loans and requests additional


Table of Contents

collateral when necessary in order to mitigate the risk of loss. As there is minimal risk of loss related to margin loans, the allowance for loan losses is immaterial.

Other InvestmentsNonaccrual Loans

Other investments reflectGenerally, loans are evaluated for or placed on nonaccrual status when either the Company'scollection of interest or principal has become 90 days past due or is otherwise considered doubtful of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest payments received on loans on nonaccrual status are generally applied to principal or in affordable housing partnershipsaccordance with the loan agreement unless the remaining principal balance has been determined to be fully collectible.

Revolving unsecured consumer lines, including credit card loans, are charged off at 180 days past due. Closed-end consumer loans, other than loans secured by one to four family properties, are charged off at 120 days past due and syndicated loans. Affordable housing partnerships are accountedgenerally not placed on nonaccrual status. Loans secured by one to four family properties are charged off when management determines the assets are uncollectible and commences foreclosure proceedings on the property, at which time the property is written down to fair value less selling costs and recorded as real estate owned in other assets. Commercial mortgage loans are evaluated for underimpairment when the equity method.loan is considered for nonaccrual status, restructured or foreclosure proceedings are initiated on the property. If it is determined that the fair value is less than the current loan balance, it is written down to fair value less selling costs. Foreclosed property is recorded as real estate owned in other assets. Syndicated loans reflect amortized cost lessare placed on nonaccrual status when management determines it will not collect all contractual principal and interest on the loan.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Management determines the adequacy of the allowance for losses.loan losses by portfolio based on the overall loan portfolio composition, recent and historical loss experience, and other pertinent factors, including when applicable, internal risk ratings, loan-to-value ("LTV") ratios, FICO scores of the borrower, debt service coverage and occupancy rates, along with economic and market conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates, which may be susceptible to significant change.

The Company determines the amount of the allowance required for certain sectors based on management's assessment of relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance is recorded for homogeneous loan categories on a pool basis, based on an analysis of product mix and risk characteristics of the portfolio, including geographic concentration, bankruptcy experiences, and historical losses, adjusted for current trends and market conditions.

While the Company attributes portions of the allowance to specific loan pools as part of the allowance estimation process, the entire allowance is available to absorb losses inherent in the total loan portfolio. The allowance is increased through provisions charged to net investment income and reduced/increased by net charge-offs/recoveries.

Impaired Loans

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans may also include loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Management evaluates for impairment all restructured loans and loans with higher impairment risk factors. The impairment recognized is measured as the excess of the loan's recorded investment over: (i) the present value of its expected principal and interest payments discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, (ii) the fair value of collateral or (iii) the loan's observable market price.

Restructured Loans

A loan is classified as a restructured loan when the Company makes certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. When the interest rate, minimum payments, and/or due dates have been modified in an attempt to make the loan more affordable to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring. Generally, performance prior to the restructuring or significant events that coincide with the restructuring are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms which may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of the restructuring or after a performance period. If the borrower's ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains on nonaccrual status.

Separate Account Assets and Liabilities

Separate account assets and liabilities are primarily funds held for the exclusive benefit of variable annuity contractholders and variable life insurance policyholders.policyholders, who assume the related investment risk. Income and losses on separate account assets accrue directly to the contractholder or policyholder and are not reported in the Company's Consolidated


Table of Contents

Statements of Operations. Separate account assets are recorded at fair value. Changes in the fair value of separate account assets are offset by changes in the related separate account liabilities. The Company receives investment management fees, mortality and expense risk fees, guarantee fees and cost of insurance charges from the related accounts.

Included in separate account liabilities are investment liabilities of Threadneedle which represent the value of the units in issue of the pooled pension funds that are offered by Threadneedle's subsidiary, Threadneedle Pensions Limited.


Table of Contents

Restricted and Segregated Cash and Investments

Total restricted cash at December 31, 20082011 and 20072010 was $99$79 million and $279$110 million, respectively, which cannot be utilized for operations. The Company's restricted cash at December 31, 20082011 and 20072010 was primarily relatedcash held by Threadneedle for the benefit of customers and cash that has been pledged to certain consolidated limited partnerships.counterparties. At both December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, amounts segregated under federal and other regulations reflect resale agreements and cash of $1.8were $1.7 billion, and $1.1 billion, respectively, segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the exclusive benefit of the Company's brokerage customers. The Company's policy is to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. Such securities are valued daily and additional collateral is obtained when appropriate.

Land, Buildings, Equipment and Software

Land, buildings, equipment and internally developed or purchased software are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization and are reflected within other assets. The Company generally uses the straight-line method of depreciation and amortization over periods ranging from three to 30 years. At December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, land, buildings, equipment and software were $824$774 million and $849$693 million, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation of $860 million and $757 million, respectively.$1.1 billion at both periods. Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009 was $169$143 million, $146$160 million and $126$176 million, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the amount of an acquired company's acquisition cost in excess of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually on the measurement date of July 1 and whenever events and circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit. In determining whether impairment has occurred, the Company uses a combination of the market approach and the discounted cash flow method, a variation of the income approach.

Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives unless they are deemed to have indefinite useful lives. The Company evaluates the definite lived intangible assets remaining useful lives annually on the measurement date of July 1 and tests for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate. For definite lived intangible assets subject to amortization, impairment to fair value is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable. Indefinite lived intangibles are also tested for impairment annually or whenever circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. Impairment is recognized by the amount carrying value exceeds fair value.

Goodwill and other intangible assets are reflected in other assets.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Freestanding derivative instruments are recorded at fair value and are reflected in other assets andor other liabilities. See Note 18 for information regarding theThe Company's policy is to not offset fair value measurement of derivative instruments.amounts recognized for derivatives and collateral arrangements executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and the resulting hedge designation, if any. The Company primarily uses derivatives as economic hedges that are not designated as accounting hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The Company occasionally designates derivatives as (1)(i) hedges of changes in the fair value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments ("fair value hedges"), (2)(ii) hedges of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ("cash flow hedges"), or (3)(iii) hedges of foreign currency exposures of net investments in foreign operations ("net investment hedges in foreign operations").

For derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in current period earnings. Changes in fair value of derivatives hedging variable annuity living benefits, equity indexed annuities and stock market certificates are included within benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses, interest credited to fixed accounts and banking and deposit interest expense, respectively. Changes in fair value of all other derivatives are a component of net investment income.

For derivative instruments that qualify as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives, as well as of the corresponding hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments, are recognized in current earnings. If a fair value hedge designation is removed or the hedge is terminated prior to maturity, previous adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged item are recognized into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item.

For derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the gain or loss on the derivative instruments are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings when the hedged


Table of Contents


item or transaction impacts earnings. The amount that is reclassified into earnings is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with the hedged instrument or transaction impact. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported currently in earnings as a component of net investment income. If a hedge designation is removed or a hedge is terminated prior to maturity, the amount previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) may be recognized into earnings over the period that the hedged item impacts earnings. For any hedge relationships that are discontinued because the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur according to the original strategy, any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recognized in earnings immediately.

For derivative instruments that qualify as net investment hedges in foreign operations, the effective portions of the change in fair value of the derivatives are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as part of the foreign currency translation adjustment. Any ineffective portions of net investment hedges are recognized in net investment income during the period of change.

Derivative instruments that are entered into for hedging purposes are designated as such at the time the Company enters into the contract. For all derivative instruments that are designated for hedging activities, the Company formally documents all of the hedging relationships between the hedge instruments and the hedged items at the inception of the relationships. Management also formally documents its risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transactions. The Company formally assesses, at inception and on a quarterly basis, whether derivatives designated as hedges are highly effective in offsetting the fair value or cash flows of hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, the Company will discontinue the application of hedge accounting.

For derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as accounting hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in current period earnings. Changes in fair value of derivatives are presented in the Consolidated


Table of Contents

Statements of Operations based on the nature and use of the instrument. Changes in fair value of derivatives used as economic hedges are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with the corresponding change in the hedged asset or liability.

For derivative instruments that qualify as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives, as well as changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments, are recognized on a net basis in current period earnings. The carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted for the change in fair value from the designated hedged risk. If a fair value hedge designation is removed or the hedge is terminated prior to maturity, previous adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged item are recognized into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item.

For derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instruments is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings when the hedged item or transaction impacts earnings. The amount that is reclassified into earnings is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with the hedged instrument or transaction impact. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in current period earnings as a component of net investment income. If a hedge designation is removed or a hedge is terminated prior to maturity, the amount previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reclassified to earnings over the period that the hedged item impacts earnings. For hedge relationships that are discontinued because the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur according to the original strategy, any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recognized in earnings immediately.

For derivative instruments that qualify as net investment hedges in foreign operations, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as part of the foreign currency translation adjustment. Any ineffective portion of the net investment hedges in foreign operations is recognized in net investment income during the period of change.

See Note 14 for information regarding the Company's fair value measurement of derivative instruments and Note 15 for the impact of derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The equity component of equity indexed annuity ("EIA"), indexed universal life ("IUL") and stock market investment certificate obligations are considered embedded derivatives. Additionally, certain annuities contain guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit ("GMAB") and guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit ("GMWB") provisions. The GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions are also considered embedded derivatives. The fair value of embedded derivatives associated with annuities and IUL is included in future policy benefits and claims, whereas the fair value of stock market investment certificate embedded derivatives is included in customer deposits. The changes in the fair value of the equity indexed annuityEIA and investment certificateIUL embedded derivatives are reflected in interest credited to fixed accounts and banking and deposit interest expense, respectively.accounts. The changes in the fair value of the GMWBstock market certificate embedded derivatives are included in banking and deposit interest expense. The changes in the fair value of the GMAB and GMWB embedded derivatives are reflected in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.

Deferred Acquisition Costs ("DAC")

DAC represent the costs of acquiring new business, principally direct sales commissions and other distribution and underwriting costs that have been deferred on the sale of annuity and insurance products and, to a lesser extent, certain mutual fund products. These costs are deferred to the extent they are recoverable from future profits or premiums. The DAC associated with insurance or annuity contracts that are significantly modified or internally replaced with another contract are accounted for as contract terminations. These transactions are anticipated in establishing amortization periods and other valuation assumptions.

Direct sales commissions and other costs deferred as DAC are amortized over time. For annuity and universal life ("UL") contracts, DAC are amortized based on projections of estimated gross profits over amortization periods equal to the approximate life of the business. For other insurance products, DAC are generally amortized as a percentage of premiums over amortization periods equal to the premium-paying period. For certain mutual fund products, DAC are generally amortized over fixed periods on a straight-line basis adjusted for redemptions.

For annuity and universal lifeUL insurance products, the assumptions made in projecting future results and calculating the DAC balance and DAC amortization expense are management's best estimates. Management is required to update these assumptions whenever it appears that, based on actual experience or other evidence, earlier estimates should be revised. When assumptions are changed, the percentage of estimated gross profits used to amortize DAC might also change. A change in the required amortization percentage is applied retrospectively; an increase in amortization percentage will result in a decrease in the DAC balance and an increase in DAC amortization expense, while a decrease in amortization percentage will result in an increase in the DAC balance and a decrease in DAC amortization expense. The impact on results of operations of changing assumptions can be either positive or negative in any particular period and is reflected in the period in which such changes are made.


Table of Contents

For other life and health insurance products, the assumptions made in calculating the DAC balance and DAC amortization expense are consistent with those used in determining the liabilities and, therefore, are intended to provide for adverse deviations in experience and are revised only if management concludes experience will be so adverse that DAC isare not recoverable. If management concludes that DAC isare not recoverable, DAC isare reduced to the amount that is recoverable based on best estimate assumptions and there is a corresponding expense recorded in consolidated resultsthe Consolidated Statements of operations.


Table of ContentsOperations.

For annuity, life and health insurance products, key assumptions underlying those long termlong-term projections include interest rates (both earning rates on invested assets and rates credited to contractholder and policyholder accounts), equity market performance, mortality and morbidity rates and the rates at which policyholders are expected to surrender their contracts, make withdrawals from their contracts and make additional deposits to their contracts. Assumptions about earned and credited interest rates are the primary factors used to project interest margins, while assumptions about equity and bond market performance are the primary factors used to project client asset value growth rates, and assumptions about surrenders, withdrawals and deposits comprise projected persistency rates. Management must also make assumptions to project maintenance expenses associated with servicing the Company's annuity and insurance businesses during the DAC amortization period.

The client asset value growth rates are the rates at which variable annuity and variable universal life ("VUL") insurance contract values invested in separate accounts are assumed to appreciate in the future. The rates used vary by equity and fixed income investments. Management reviews and, where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions with respect to client asset value growth rates on a regular basis. The Company typically uses a five-year mean reversion process as a guideline in setting near-term equity assetfund growth rates based on a long-term view of financial market performance as well as recent actual performance. The suggested near- termnear-term equity fund growth rate is reviewed quarterly to ensure consistency with management's assessment of anticipated equity market performance. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company decided to constrain near-term equity growth rates below the level suggested by mean reversion. This constraint is based on management's analysis of historical equity returns following downturns in the market. DAC amortization expense recorded in a period when client asset value growth rates exceed management's near-term estimate will typically be less than in a period when growth rates fall short of management's near-term estimate.

The Company monitors other principal DAC amortization assumptions, such as persistency, mortality, morbidity, interest margin and maintenance expense levels each quarter and, when assessed independently, each could impact the Company's DAC balances.

The analysis of DAC balances and the corresponding amortization is a dynamic process that considers all relevant factors and assumptions described previously. Unless the Company's management identifies a significant deviation over the course of the quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these DAC amortization assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.

Deferred Sales Inducement Costs ("DSIC")

DSIC consist of bonus interest credits and premium credits added to certain annuity contract and insurance policy values and are reflected in other assets.values. These benefits are capitalized to the extent they are incremental to amounts that would be credited on similar contracts without the applicable feature. The amounts capitalized are amortized using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. DSIC is recorded in other assets, and amortization of DSIC is recorded in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.

Reinsurance

The Company cedes significant amounts of insurance risk to other insurers under reinsurance agreements. Reinsurance premiumpremiums paid and benefits received are accounted for consistently with the basis used in accounting for the policies from which risk is reinsured and consistently with the terms of the reinsurance contracts. TraditionalReinsurance premiums for traditional life, long term care ("LTC"), disability income ("DI") and auto and home reinsurance premium,ceded on a coinsurance basis, net of the change in any prepaid reinsurance asset, isare reported as a reduction of premiums. Fixed and variable universal life reinsurance premium ispremiums are reported as a reduction of other revenues. In addition, for fixed and variable universal life insurance policies, the net cost of reinsurance ceded, which represents the discounted amount of the expected cash flows between the reinsurer and the Company, is recognized as an asset and amortized over the term of the reinsurance contract, in proportion to the estimated gross profits and is subject to retrospective adjustment in a manner similar to retrospective adjustment of DAC. The assumptions used to project the expected cash flows are consistent with those used for DAC asset valuation for the same contracts. Changes in the net cost of reinsurance are reflected as a component of other revenues. Reinsurance recoveries are reported as components of benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.

Insurance liabilities are reported before the effects of reinsurance. Future policy benefits and claims recoverable under reinsurance contracts are recorded within receivables.


Table of Contents

The Company also assumes life insurance and fixed annuity business from other insurers in limited circumstances. Reinsurance premiumpremiums received and benefits paid are accounted for consistently with the basis used in accounting for the policies from which risk is reinsured and consistently with the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Liabilities for assumed business are recorded within future policy benefits and claims.

See Note 107 for additional information on reinsurance.

Future Policy Benefits and Claims

Fixed Annuities and Variable Annuity Guarantees

Future policy benefits and claims related to fixed annuities and variable annuity guarantees include liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable deferred annuities, guaranteed benefits associated with variable annuities, equity indexed annuities and fixed annuities in a payout status.


Table of Contents

Liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable deferred annuities are equal to accumulation values, which are the cumulative gross deposits and credited interest less withdrawals and various charges.

The majority of the variable annuity contracts offered by the Company contain guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB") provisions. When market values of the customer's accounts decline, the death benefit payable on a contract with a GMDB may exceed the contract accumulation value. The Company also offers variable annuities with death benefit provisions that gross up the amount payable by a certain percentage of contract earnings, which are referred to as gain gross-up ("GGU") benefits. In addition, the Company offers contracts containing GMWB and GMAB provisions, and until May 2007, the Company offered contracts containing guaranteed minimum income benefit ("GMIB") provisions. As a result of the recent market decline, the amount by which guarantees exceed the accumulation value has increased significantly.

In determining the liabilities for variable annuity death benefits,GMDB, GMIB and the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB, the Company projects these benefits and contract assessments using actuarial models to simulate various equity market scenarios. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC asset valuation for the same contracts. As with DAC, management will reviewreviews and, where appropriate, adjustadjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management will reviewreviews and updateupdates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.

The variable annuity death benefitGMDB liability is determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value and recognizing the excess over the estimated meaningful life based on expected assessments (e.g., mortality and expense fees, contractual administrative charges and similar fees).

If elected by the contract owner and after a stipulated waiting period from contract issuance, a GMIB guarantees a minimum lifetime annuity based on a specified rate of contract accumulation value growth and predetermined annuity purchase rates. The GMIB liability is determined each period by estimating the expected value of annuitization benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value at the date of annuitization and recognizing the excess over the estimated meaningful life based on expected assessments.

The embedded derivatives related to GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions are recorded at fair value. See Note 1814 for information regarding the fair value measurement of embedded derivatives. The liability for the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions is determined in the same way as the liability for variable annuity death benefits.GMDB liability. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and fees relate to persistency and benefit utilization. As with DAC, management reviews, and where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year. The changes in both the fair values of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives and the liability for life contingent benefits are reflected in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.

Liabilities for equity indexed annuities are equal to the accumulation of host contract values covering guaranteed benefits and the marketfair value of embedded equity options.

Liabilities for fixed annuities in a benefit or payout status are based on future estimated payments using established industry mortality tables and interest rates, ranging from 4.6% to 9.5% at December 31, 2008, depending on year of issue, with an average rate of approximately 5.8%.rates.

Life and Health Insurance

Future policy benefits and claims related to life and health insurance include liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable universal life policies, liabilities for indexed accounts of IUL products, liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported claims, estimates of benefits payable on claims incurred but not yet reported and estimates of benefits that will become payable on term life, whole life and health insurance policies as claims are incurred in the future.


Table of Contents

Liabilities for fixed account values on fixed and variable universal life insurance are equal to accumulation values. Accumulation values are the cumulative gross deposits and credited interest less various contractual expense and mortality charges and less amounts withdrawn by policyholders.

Liabilities for indexed accounts of IUL products are equal to the accumulation of host contract values covering guaranteed benefits and the fair value of embedded equity options.

A portion of the Company's fixed and variable universal life contracts have product features that result in profits followed by losses from the insurance component of the contract. These profits followed by losses can be generated by the cost structure of the product or secondary guarantees in the contract. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges.

In determining the liability for contracts with profits followed by losses, the Company projects benefits and contract assessments using actuarial models. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC asset valuation for the same contracts. As with DAC, management reviews, and where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.

The liability for these future losses is determined by estimating the death benefits in excess of account value and recognizing the excess over the estimated meaningful life based on expected assessments (e.g. cost of insurance charges, contractual administrative charges, similar fees and investment margin). See Note 10 for information regarding the liability for contracts with secondary guarantees.

Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported life insurance claims are equal to the death benefits payable under the policies. Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported health insurance claims include any periodic or other benefit amounts due and accrued, along with estimates of the present value of obligations for continuing benefit payments. These amounts are calculated based on claim continuance tables which estimate the likelihood an individual will continue to be eligible for benefits. Present values are calculated at interest rates established when claims are incurred. Anticipated claim continuance rates are based on established industry tables, adjusted as appropriate for the Company's experience. Interest rates used with disability income claims ranged from 3.0% to 8.0% at December 31, 2008, with an average rate of 4.8%. Interest rates used with long term care claims ranged from 4.0% to 7.0% at December 31, 2008, with an average rate of 4.1%.

Liabilities for estimated benefits payable on claims that have been incurred but not yet reported are based on periodic analysis of the actual time lag between when a claim occurs and when it is reported.


Table of Contents

Liabilities for estimates of benefits that will become payable on future claims on term life, whole life and health insurance policies are based on the net level premium method, using anticipated premium payments, mortality and morbidity rates, policy persistency and interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability. Anticipated mortality and morbidity rates are based on established industry mortality and morbidity tables, with modifications based on the Company's experience. Anticipated premium payments and persistency rates vary by policy form, issue age, policy duration and certain other pricing factors. Anticipated interest rates for term and whole life ranged from 4.0% to 10.0% at December 31, 2008, depending on policy form, issue year and policy duration. Anticipated interest rates for disability income vary by plan and are 7.5% and 6.0% at policy issue grading to 5.0% over five years and 4.5% over 20 years, respectively. Anticipated discount rates for long term care vary by plan and were 5.8% at December 31, 2008 and range from 5.9% to 6.3% over 40 years.

Where applicable, benefit amounts expected to be recoverable from reinsurance companies who share in the risk are separately recorded as reinsurance recoverable within receivables.

Auto and Home Reserves

Auto and home reserves include amounts determined from loss reports on individual claims, as well as amounts based on historical loss experience for losses incurred but not yet reported. Such liabilities are necessarily based on estimates and, while management believes that the reserve amounts arewere adequate at December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts provided. The Company's methods for making such estimates and for establishing the resulting liabilityliabilities are continually reviewed, and any adjustments are reflected in consolidated results of operationsearnings in the period such adjustments are made.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company measures and recognizes the cost of share-based awards granted to employees and directors based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognizes the expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of each option is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company recognizes the cost of share-based awards granted to independent contractors on a fair value basis until the award is fully vested.

Income Taxes

The Company's provision for income taxes represents the net amount of income taxes that the Company expects to pay or to receive from various taxing jurisdictions in connection with its operations. The Company provides for income taxes based on amounts that the Company believes it will ultimately owe taking into account the recognition and measurement for


Table of Contents

uncertain tax positions. Inherent in the provision for income taxes are estimates and judgments regarding the tax treatment of certain items.

In connection with the provision for income taxes, the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect certain amounts related to deferred tax assets and liabilities, which result from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities measured for financial statement purposes versus the assets and liabilities measured for tax return purposes. Among the Company'sIncluded in deferred tax assets is aare significant deferred tax asset relating to capital losses that have been recognized for financial statement purposes but not yet for tax return purposes as well as future deductible capital losses realized for tax return purposes. Under current U.S. federal income tax law, capital losses generally must be used against capital gain income within five years of the year in which the capital losses are recognized for tax purposes.

We areThe Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of ourits deferred tax assets that management believes will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining if a valuation allowance should be established and the amount of such allowance if required. Factors used in making this determination include estimates relating to the performance of the business including the ability to generate capital gains. Consideration is given to, among other things in making this determination, a)determination: (i) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, b)carryforwards; (ii) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, c)differences; (iii) taxable income in prior carryback years,years; and d)(iv) tax planning strategies. Management may need to identify and implement appropriate planning strategies to ensure its ability to realize deferred tax assets and avoid the establishment of a valuation allowance with respect to such assets. In the opinion of management, it is currently more likely than not that the Company will not realize the full benefit of certain state net operating losses and therefore a valuation allowance of $5 million has been established as of December 31, 2011.

Sources of Revenue

The Company generates revenue from a wide range of investment and insurance products. Principal sources of revenue include management and financial advice fees, distribution fees, net investment income and premiums.

Management and Financial Advice Fees

Management and financial advice fees relate primarily to fees earned from managing mutual funds, separate account and wrap account assets and institutional investments including structured investments, as well as fees earned from providing


Table of Contents


financial advice and administrative services (including transfer agent, administration and custodial fees earned from providing services to retail mutual funds). Management and financial advice fees also include mortality and expense risk fees earned on separate account assets.

The Company's management and risk fees are generally computed as a contractual rate applied to the underlying asset values and are generally accrued daily and collected monthly. ManyA significant portion of the Company's management fees are calculated as a percentage of the fair value of its managed assets. The substantial majority of the Company's managed assets are valued by third party pricing services vendors based upon observable market data. The selection of the Company's third party pricing services vendors and the reliability of their prices are subject to certain governance procedures, such as exception reporting, subsequent transaction testing, and annual due diligence of our vendors, which includes assessing the vendor's valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions.

Several of the Company's mutual funds havehad a performance incentive adjustment ("PIA"). The PIA increasesincreased or decreasesdecreased the level of management fees received based on the specific fund's relative performance as measured against a designated external index. We discontinued the PIA earned by the Company's domestic mutual funds during 2011. The Company recognizesrecognized PIA fee revenue monthly on a 12 month rolling performance basis. The Company may also receive performance-based incentive fees from hedge funds or other structured investments that it manages. The annual performance fees for structured investments are recognized as revenue at the time the performance fee is finalized or no longer subject to adjustment. All other performance fees are based on a full contract year and are final at the end of the contract year. Any performance fees received are not subject to repayment or any other clawback provisions. Employee benefit plan and institutional investment management and administration services fees are negotiated and are also generally based on underlying asset values. The Company may receive performance-based incentive fees from structured investments and hedge funds that it manages, which are recognized as revenue at the end of the performance period. Fees from financial planning and advice services are recognized when the financial plan is delivered.

Distribution Fees

Distribution fees primarily include point-of-sale fees (such as mutual fund front-end sales loads) and asset-based fees (such as 12b-1 distribution and shareholder service fees) that are generally based on a contractual percentage of assets and recognized when earned. Distribution fees also include amounts received under marketing support arrangements for sales of mutual funds and other companies' products, such as through the Company's wrap accounts, as well as surrender charges on fixed and variable universal life insurance and annuities.


Table of Contents

Net Investment Income

Net investment income primarily includes interest income on fixed maturity securities classified as Available-for-Sale, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans, consumer loans, other investments and cash and cash equivalents; the changes in fair value of trading securities, including seed money,certain derivatives and certain derivatives;assets and liabilities of consolidated investment entities; the pro rata share of net income or loss on equity method investments; and realized gains and losses on the sale of securities and charges for other-than-temporary impairments of investments determinedrelated to be other-than-temporarily impaired.credit losses. Interest income is accrued as earned using the effective interest method, which makes an adjustment of the yield for security premiums and discounts on all performing fixed maturity securities classified as Available-for-Sale excluding structured securities, and commercial mortgage loans so that the related security or loan recognizes a constant rate of return on the outstanding balance throughout its term. For beneficial interests in structured securities, the excess cash flows attributable to a beneficial interest over the initial investment are recognized as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Realized gains and losses on securities, other than trading securities and equity method investments, are recognized using the specific identification method on a trade date basis.

Premiums

Premiums include premiums on property-casualty insurance, traditional life and health (disability income(DI and long term care)LTC) insurance and immediate annuities with a life contingent feature. Premiums on auto and home insurance are net of reinsurance premiums and are recognized ratably over the coverage period. Premiums on traditional life and health insurance are net of reinsurance ceded and are recognized as revenue when due.


3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Receivables

In January 2009,April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 99-20-1 "Amendmentsupdated the accounting standards for troubled debt restructurings. The new standard includes indicators that a lender should consider in determining whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and provides clarification for determining whether the lender has granted a concession to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20" ("FSP EITF 99-20-1"). FSP EITF 99-20-1 amendsborrower. The standard sets the impairmenteffective dates for troubled debt restructuring disclosures required by recent guidance in EITF 99-20on credit quality disclosures. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and is to be more consistent with other impairment models used for debt securities. FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effectiveapplied retrospectively to modifications occurring on or after the beginning of the annual period of adoption. For purposes of measuring impairments of receivables that are considered impaired as a result of applying the new guidance, the standard should be applied prospectively for reporting periods endingthe interim or annual period beginning on or after DecemberJune 15, 2008.2011. The adoptionCompany adopted the standard in the third quarter of FSP EITF 99-20-012011. The adoption did not have a materialany effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. See Note 6 for the required disclosures.

Fair Value

In December 2008,January 2010, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1 "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets" ("FSP 132(R)-1"). FSP 132(R)-1 requires enhanced disclosureupdated the accounting standards related to plandisclosures on fair value measurements. The standard expands the current disclosure requirements to include additional detail about significant transfers between Levels 1 and 2 within the fair value hierarchy and presents activity in the rollforward of Level 3 activity on a gross basis. The standard also clarifies existing disclosure requirements related to the level of disaggregation to be used for assets including information aboutand liabilities as well as disclosures on the inputs and valuation techniques used to determine themeasure fair value of plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1value. The standard is effective for the first fiscal year endinginterim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The Company will applyexcept for the disclosure requirements of FSP 132(R)-1 as of December 31, 2009.

In December 2008,related to the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 "Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities,"Level 3 rollforward, which isare effective for the first reporting period endinginterim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008. This FSP requires2010. The Company adopted the standard in the first quarter of 2010, except for the additional disclosuredisclosures related to transfers of financial assets and variable interest entities. Thethe Level 3 rollforward, which the Company applied the disclosure requirements of this FSP as of December 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

In November 2008, the FASB issued EITF No. 08-6 "Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations" ("EITF 08-6"), which is effective foradopted in the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. EITF 08-6 clarifies the effectsquarter of the issuance of SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141(R)") and SFAS No. 160 "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51" ("SFAS 160"). See further information on the issuance of SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 below.2011. The Company will apply EITF 08-6 to any transactions within scope occurring after December 31, 2008.

In November 2008, the FASB issued EITF No. 08-7 "Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets" ("EITF 08-7"), which is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. EITF 08-7 provides guidance on intangible assets acquired after the effective date of SFAS 141(R) that an entity does not intend to actively use but intends to hold to prevent others from using. The Company will apply EITF 08-7 to any transactions within scope occurring after December 31, 2008.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active" ("FSP 157-3"), which was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS 157") in a market that is not active and provides an example of key considerations to determine the fair value of financial assets when the market for those assets is not active. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a materialany effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. See Note 4 and Note 14 for the required disclosures.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

In June 2008,2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities" ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards with nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities and should be included inupdated the calculation of earnings per share pursuantaccounting standards related to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 isconsolidation of VIEs. The standard amends the guidance on the determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE from a quantitative model to a qualitative model and requires additional disclosures about an enterprise's involvement in VIEs. Under the new qualitative model, the primary beneficiary must have both the power to direct the activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive gains that could be potentially significant to the VIE. In February 2010, the FASB amended this guidance to defer application of the consolidation requirements for certain investment funds. The standards are effective for financial statements issued for periods beginning after December 15, 2008 with early adoption prohibited. FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires that all prior-period earnings per share data be adjusted retrospectively to conform with the FSP provisions. The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF 03-6-1 to have a material effect on its earnings per shareinterim and consolidated results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133" ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 intends to improve financialannual reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about their impact on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 requires disclosures regarding the objectives for using derivative instruments, the fair value of derivative instruments and their related gains and losses, and the accounting for derivatives and related hedged items. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,2009. The Company adopted the standards effective January 1, 2010 and as a result consolidated certain collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs"). At adoption, the Company recorded a $5.5 billion increase to assets and a $5.1 billion increase to liabilities. The difference between the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the CDOs was recorded as a cumulative effect increase of $473 million to appropriated retained earnings of consolidated investment entities. Such amounts are recorded as appropriated retained earnings as the CDO note


Table of Contents

holders, not Ameriprise Financial, ultimately will receive the benefits or absorb the losses associated with the assets and liabilities of the CDOs. Subsequent to the adoption, the net change in fair value of the assets and liabilities of the CDOs will be recorded as net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and as an adjustment to appropriated retained earnings of consolidated investment entities. See Note 4 for additional information related to the application of the amended VIE consolidation model and the required disclosures.

Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments ("OTTI")

In April 2009, the FASB updated the accounting standards for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments. The standard amends existing guidance on other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities and requires that the credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments be recorded in earnings and the noncredit portion of losses be recorded in other comprehensive income when the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its cost basis. The standard requires separate presentation of both the credit and noncredit portions of other-than-temporary impairments on the financial statements and additional disclosures. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted.permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. At the date of adoption, the portion of previously recognized other-than-temporary impairments that represent the noncredit related loss component shall be recognized as a cumulative effect of adoption with an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company adopted the standard in the first quarter of 2009 and recorded a cumulative effect increase to the opening balance of retained earnings of $132 million, net of DAC and DSIC amortization, certain benefit reserves and income taxes, and a corresponding increase to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of impacts to DAC and DSIC amortization, certain benefit reserves and income taxes. See Note 5 for the required disclosures.

Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Balance Sheet

In December 2011, the FASB updated the accounting standards to require new disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The standard requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 on a retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 161 on its disclosures. The Company's adoption of SFAS 161 will not impact its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, and goodwill acquired. SFAS 141(R) also requires an acquirer to disclose information about the financial effects of a business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective prospectively for business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company will apply the standard to any business combinations within the scope of SFAS 141(R) occurring after December 31, 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, which establishes the accounting and reporting for ownership interest in subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS 160 requires that noncontrolling (minority) interests be classified as equity (instead of as a liability) within the consolidated balance sheet, and net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest be disclosed on the face of the consolidated statement of income. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years with early adoption prohibited. The provisions of SFAS 160 are to be applied prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which are to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 160 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Comprehensive Income

In September 2006,June 2011, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an Amendmentupdated the accounting standards related to the presentation of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" ("SFAS 158"). As of December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition provisions of SFAS 158 which require an entity to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of an employer's defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The Company'sstandard requires entities to present all nonowner changes in stockholders' equity either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The standard is to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of the recognition provisions of SFAS 158 didstandard will not have a material effect onimpact the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. As of December 31, 2008,

Fair Value

In May 2011, the Company adoptedFASB updated the accounting standards related to fair value measurement provisions of SFAS 158 which require the measurement of planand disclosure requirements. The standard requires entities, for assets and benefit obligationsliabilities measured at fair value in the statement of financial position which are Level 3 fair value measurements, to be asdisclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the measurements, a description of the valuation processes in place, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs if a change in those inputs would result in a significantly different fair value measurement. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy for each class of assets and liabilities not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but for which the fair value is disclosed. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Transfers and Servicing: Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements

In April 2011, the FASB updated the accounting standards related to accounting for repurchase agreements and other similar agreements. The standard modifies the criteria for determining when these transactions would be accounted for as secured borrowings as opposed to sales. The standard is effective prospectively for new transfers and existing transactions that are modified in the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition.


Table of Contents


same dateAccounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts

In October 2010, the FASB updated the accounting standards for DAC. Under this new standard, only the following costs incurred in the acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts would be capitalizable as DAC: (i) incremental direct costs of a successful contract acquisition, (ii) portions of employees' salaries and benefits directly related to time spent performing specified acquisition activities (that is, underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection, and sales force contract selling) for a contract that has actually been acquired, (iii) other costs related to the employer's fiscal year-end statement of financial position.specified acquisition activities that would not have been incurred had the acquisition contract not occurred, and (iv) advertising costs that meet the capitalization criteria in other GAAP guidance for certain direct-response marketing. All other costs are to be expensed as incurred. The Company's adoptionCompany retrospectively adopted the standard on January 1, 2012. The cumulative effect of the measurement provisions of SFAS 158 resulted in an after-tax decrease toadoption reduced retained earnings of $5 million.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are required to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which SFAS 157 is initially applied, except for certain financial instruments as defined in SFAS 157 that require retrospective application. Any retrospective application will be recognized as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year of adoption. The Company adopted SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008 and recorded a cumulative effect reduction to the opening balance of retained earnings of $30 million, net of DAC and DSIC amortization and income taxes. This reduction to retained earnings was related to adjusting the fair value of certain derivatives the Company uses to hedge its exposure to market risk related to certain variable annuity riders. The Company initially recorded these derivatives in accordance with EITF Issue No. 02-3 "Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" ("EITF 02-3"). SFAS 157 nullifies the guidance in EITF 02-3 and requires these derivatives to be marked to the price the Company would receive to sell the derivatives to a market participant (an exit price). The adoption of SFAS 157 also resulted in adjustments to the fair value of the Company's embedded derivative liabilities associated with certain variable annuity riders. Since there is no market for these liabilities, the Company considered the assumptions participants in a hypothetical market would make to determine an exit price. As a result, the Company adjusted the valuation of these liabilities by updating certain policyholder assumptions, adding explicit margins to provide for profit, risk, and expenses, and adjusting the rate used to discount expected cash flows to reflect a current market estimate of the Company's risk of nonperformance specific to these liabilities. These adjustments resulted in an adoption impact of a $4 million increase in earnings, net of DAC and DSIC amortization and income taxes,$1.4 billion after-tax at January 1, 2008. The nonperformance risk component of the adjustment is specific to the risk of RiverSource Life Insurance Company ("RiverSource Life") and RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York ("RiverSource Life of NY") (collectively, "RiverSource Life companies") not fulfilling these liabilities. As the Company's estimate of this credit spread widens or tightens, the liability will decrease or increase.

In accordance with FSP FAS 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157" ("FSP 157-2"), the Company deferred the adoption of SFAS 157 until January 1, 2009 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. See Note 18 for additional information regarding the fair value of the Company's assets and liabilities.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and recorded a cumulative change in accounting principle resulting in an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a decrease in beginning retained earnings of $4 million.

In September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 05-1, "Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts" ("SOP 05-1"). SOP 05-1 provides clarifying guidance on accounting for DAC associated with an insurance or annuity contract that is significantly modified or is internally replaced with another contract. Prior to adoption, the Company accounted for many of these transactions as contract continuations and continued amortizing existing DAC against revenue for the new or modified contract. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SOP 05-1 resulting in these transactions being prospectively accounted for as contract terminations. Consistent with this, the Company now anticipates these transactions in establishing amortization periods and other valuation assumptions. As a result of adopting SOP 05-1, the Company recorded as a cumulative change in accounting principle $206 million, reducing DAC by $204 million, DSIC by $11 million and liabilities for future policy benefits by $9 million. The after-tax decrease to retained earnings for these changes was $134 million.2012.


4. Separation and Distribution from American Express

Ameriprise Financial was formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express Company ("American Express"). On February 1, 2005, the American Express Board of Directors announced its intention to pursue the disposition of 100% of its shareholdings in Ameriprise Financial (the "Separation") through a tax-free distribution to American Express shareholders. Effective as of the close of business on September 30, 2005, American Express completed the separation of Ameriprise

Consolidated Investment Entities

Table of Contents


Financial and the distribution of the Ameriprise Financial common shares to American Express shareholders (the "Distribution").

American Express historically provided a variety of corporate and other support services for the Company, including information technology, treasury, accounting, financial reporting, tax administration, human resources, marketing, legal and other services. Following the Distribution, American Express provided the Company with many of these services pursuant to transition services agreements for transition periods of up to two years or more, if extended by mutual agreement of the Company and American Express. The Company terminated all of these service agreements and completed its separation from American Express in 2007.

The Company incurred significant non-recurring separation costs in 2007 and 2006 as a result of the Separation. These costs were primarily associated with establishing the Ameriprise Financial brand, separating and reestablishing the Company's technology platforms and advisor and employee retention programs.

5. Acquisitions

In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company completed its all-cash acquisitions of H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc., subsequently renamed Ameriprise Advisor Services, Inc. ("AASI"), J. & W. Seligman & Co., Incorporated ("Seligman") and Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. for $329 million, $432 million and $26 million, respectively. The cost of the acquisitions included the purchase price and transaction costs. These acquisitions further expanded the Company's retail distribution and asset management businesses. The Company recorded the assets and liabilities acquired at fair value and allocated the remaining costs to goodwill and intangible assets. See Note 2 and Note 9 for additional information on goodwill and intangible assets.

In 2006, the Company's subsidiary Ameriprise Bank, FSB ("Ameriprise Bank") commenced operations and purchased consumer loans and assumed deposits of American Express Bank, FSB ("AEBFSB"), a subsidiary of American Express. Ameriprise Bank acquired $493 million of customer loans and $963 million of customer deposits and received net cash of $470 million. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. Separately, in 2006, the Company purchased $33 million of secured loans from American Express Credit Corporation for cash consideration. The Company recorded the loans purchased at fair value.

6. Variable Interest Entities

The Company provides asset management services to various CDOs and other investment products (collectively, "investment entities"), which are sponsored by the Company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. Certain of these investment entities are considered to be VIEs while others are considered to be voting rights entities ("VREs"). The Company consolidates certain of these investment entities.

The CDOs managed by the Company are considered VIEs. These CDOs are asset backed financing entities collateralized by a pool of assets, primarily syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, high-yield bonds. Multiple tranches of debt securities are issued by a CDO, offering investors various maturity and credit risk characteristics. The debt securities issued by the CDOs are non-recourse to the Company. The CDO's debt holders have recourse only to the assets of the CDO. The assets of the CDOs cannot be used by the Company. Scheduled debt payments are based on the performance of the CDO's collateral pool. The Company generally earns management fees from the CDOs based on the par value of outstanding debt and, in certain instances, may also receive performance-based fees. In the normal course of business, the Company has invested in certain CDOs, generally an insignificant portion of the unrated, junior subordinated debt.

For certain of the CDOs, the Company has determined that consolidation is required as it has power over the CDOs and holds a variable interestsinterest in the CDOs for which the Company has the potential to receive significant benefits or the potential obligation to absorb significant losses. For other CDOs managed by the Company, the Company has determined that consolidation is not required as the Company does not hold a variable interest in the CDOs.

The Company provides investment advice and related services to private, pooled investment vehicles organized as limited partnerships, limited liability companies or foreign (non-U.S.) entities. Certain of these pooled investment vehicles are considered VIEs while others are VREs. For investment management services, the Company generally earns management fees based on the market value of assets under management, and in certain instances may also receive performance-based fees. The Company provides seed money occasionally to certain of these funds. For certain of the pooled investment vehicles, the Company has determined that consolidation is required as the Company stands to absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses or receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns. For other VIE pooled investment vehicles, the Company has determined that consolidation is not required because the Company is not expected to absorb the majority of the expected losses or receive the majority of the expected residual returns. For the pooled investment vehicles which are VREs, the Company consolidates the structure when it has a controlling financial interest.

The Company also provides investment advisory, distribution and other services to the Columbia and Threadneedle mutual fund families. The Company has determined that consolidation is not required for these mutual funds.

In addition, the Company may invest in structured investments including VIEs for which it is not the sponsor. These structured investments typically invest in fixed income instruments and are managed by third parties and include asset backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, and residential mortgage backed securities. The Company includes these investments in Available-for-Sale securities. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these structures due to its relative size, position in the capital structure of these entities, and therefore, does not consolidate.the Company's lack of power over the structures. The Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investment in these entitiesstructured investments that it does not consolidate is limited to its carrying value. The Company has no obligation to provide further financial or other support to the VIEsthese structured investments nor has the Company provided any additional support to these structured investments. See Note 5 for additional information about these structured investments.


Table of Contents

The following tables present the VIEsbalances of assets and liabilities held by consolidated investment entities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Investments:

             

Corporate debt securities

 $ $314 $4 $318 

Common stocks

  75  25  13  113 

Other structured investments

    54    54 

Syndicated loans

    3,962  342  4,304 
  

Total investments

  75  4,355  359  4,789 

Receivables

    39    39 

Other assets

    2  1,108  1,110 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $75 $4,396 $1,467 $5,938 
  

Liabilities

             

Debt

 $ $ $4,712 $4,712 

Other liabilities

    85    85 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $ $85 $4,712 $4,797 
  


 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Investments:

             

Corporate debt securities

 $ $418 $6 $424 

Common stocks

  26  53  11  90 

Other structured investments

    39  22  61 

Syndicated loans

    4,867    4,867 

Trading securities

    2    2 
  

Total investments

  26  5,379  39  5,444 

Receivables

    33    33 

Other assets

    8  887  895 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $26 $5,420 $926 $6,372 
  

Liabilities

             

Debt

 $ $ $5,171 $5,171 

Other liabilities

    154    154 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $ $154 $5,171 $5,325 
  

The following tables provide a summary of changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities held by consolidated investment entities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Other
Structured
Investments

 Syndicated
Loans

 Other
Assets

 Debt
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2011

 $6 $11 $22 $ $887 $(5,171)

Total gains (losses) included in:

                   

Net income

    6(1) (1)(1) (12)(1) 13(2) (89)(1)

Other comprehensive income

          (10)  

Purchases

  3    3  208  299   

Sales

  (2) (4)   (40) (81)  

Issues

            (27)

Settlements

  (1)     (137) 1  575 

Transfers into Level 3

    29    615  7   

Transfers out of Level 3

  (2) (29) (24) (292) (8)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2011

 $4 $13 $ $342 $1,108 $(4,712)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in income relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2011

 
$

 
$

3

(1)

$

 
$

(5)

(1)

$

19

(3)

$

(64)

(1)
  

Table of Contents

(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Included in other than services it is separately compensated for through management agreements. The Company had no liabilities recorded asrevenues in the Consolidated Statements of December 31, 2008Operations.

(3)
Represents a $20 million gain included in other revenues and 2007 relateda $1 million loss included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Other
Structured
Investments

 Other
Assets

 Debt
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 $ $ $ $831 $ 

Cumulative effect of accounting change

  15    5    (4,962)

Total gains (losses) included in:

                

Net income

    4(1) 1(1) 67(2) (339)(1)

Other comprehensive income

        (35)  

Purchases, sales, issues and settlements, net

  (9)   12  24  130 

Transfers into Level 3

    7  4     
  

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $6 $11 $22 $887 $(5,171)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in income relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2010

 
$

 
$

4

(1)

$

1

(1)

$

40

(3)

$

(339)

(1)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Represents a $69 million gain included in other revenues and a $2 million loss included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)
Represents a $42 million gain included in other revenues and a $2 million loss included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Securities transferred from Level 2 to these entities.Level 3 represent securities with fair values that are now based on a single non-binding broker quote. Securities transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 represent securities with fair values that are now obtained from a third party pricing service with observable inputs.

The Company is a limited partner in affordable housing partnerships which qualifyhas elected the fair value option for government sponsored low income housing tax credit programs. In most cases, the Company has less than 50% interest infinancial assets and liabilities of the partnerships sharing in benefits and risks with other limited partners in proportion to the Company's ownership interest. In the limited cases in which the Company has a greater than 50% interest in affordable housing partnerships, it was determinedconsolidated CDOs. Management believes that the relationship withuse of the general partner is an agent relationshipfair value option better matches the changes in fair value of assets and the general partner was most closelyliabilities related to the partnership as it is the key decision makerCDOs.

For receivables, certain other assets and controls the operations. The carrying valuesother liabilities of the affordable housing partnershipsconsolidated CDOs, the carrying value approximates fair value as the nature of these assets and liabilities has historically been short term and the receivables have been collectible. The fair value of these assets and liabilities is classified as Level 2. Other liabilities consist primarily of securities purchased but not yet settled held by consolidated CDOs. The fair value of syndicated loans obtained from third party pricing services with multiple non-binding broker quotes as the underlying valuation source is classified as Level 2. The fair value of syndicated loans obtained from third party pricing services with a single non-binding broker quote as the underlying valuation source is classified as Level 3. Prices received from third party pricing services are reflectedsubjected to exception reporting that identifies loans with significant daily price movements as well as no movements. The Company reviews the exception reporting and resolves the exceptions through reaffirmation of the price or recording an appropriate fair value estimate. The Company also performs subsequent transaction testing. The Company performs annual due diligence of the third party pricing services. The Company's due diligence procedures include assessing the vendor's valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies, and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions and unobservable assumptions, if any, employed in investmentsthe valuation methodology. The Company also considers the results of its exception reporting controls and were $54 million and $88 million asany resulting price challenges that arise. Other assets consist primarily of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

For the collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs")properties held in consolidated pooled investment vehicles managed by Threadneedle. The fair value of these properties is determined using discounted cash flows and is calculated by a third party appraisal service. Inputs into the valuation of these properties include: rental cash flows, current occupancy, historical vacancy rates, tenant history and assumptions regarding how quickly the property can be occupied and at what rental rates. The Company also utilizes market comparables obtained from a third party appraisal service in developing its fair value assumptions. Management reviews the Company has evaluated its variabilitydiscounted cash flows and assumptions to ensure that the valuation was performed in lossesaccordance with applicable independence, appraisal and returns considering its investment levels, which are less than 50%valuation standards. Given the significance of the residual tranches, and the fees received from managing the structures and has determined that consolidation is not required.unobservable inputs to these measurements, these assets are classified as Level 3. The carrying valuesfair value of the CDOs are reflected in investmentsCDO's debt is valued using a discounted cash flow methodology. Inputs used to determine the expected cash flows include assumptions about default and were $50 million and $46 million asrecovery rates of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company manages $6.9 billionthe CDO's underlying assets. Given the significance of underlying collateral consisting primarily of below investment grade syndicated bank loans within the CDOs.

The Company consolidates a VIE for which it is considered the primary beneficiary. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had investments of $10 million and non-recourse debt of $6 million, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet relatedunobservable inputs to this entity.fair value measurement, the CDO debt is classified as Level 3. See also Note 14 for a description of the Company's determination of the fair value of other investments.


Table of Contents

The following table presents the fair value and unpaid principal balance of loans and debt for which the fair value option has been elected:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Syndicated loans

       

Unpaid principal balance

 $4,548 $5,107 

Excess estimated unpaid principal over fair value

  (244) (240)
  

Fair value

 $4,304 $4,867 
  

Fair value of loans more than 90 days past due

 
$

18
 
$

71
 

Fair value of loans in nonaccrual status

  18  71 

Difference between fair value and unpaid principal of loans more than 90 days past due, loans in nonaccrual status or both

  16  62 

Debt

       

Unpaid principal balance

 $5,335 $5,893 

Excess estimated unpaid principal over fair value

  (623) (722)
  

Fair value

 $4,712 $5,171 
  

Interest income from syndicated loans, bonds and structured investments is recorded based on contractual rates in net investment income. Gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of investments and gains and losses on sales of investments are recorded in net investment income. Interest expense on debt is recorded in interest and debt expense with gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of debt recorded in net investment income.

Total net gains (losses) recognized in net investment income related to changes in the fair value of financial assets and liabilities for which the fair value option was elected were $(122) million and $58 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The majority of the syndicated loans and debt have floating rates; as such, changes in their fair values are primarily attributable to changes in credit spreads.

Debt of the consolidated investment entities and the stated interest rates were as follows:

 
 Carrying Value
 Weighted Average Interest Rate
 
 
   
 
 December 31,
 December 31,
 
 
   
 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Debt of consolidated CDOs due 2012-2021

 $4,712 $5,171  0.9% 1.0%

Floating rate revolving credit borrowings due 2014

  378  329  3.2  2.9 

Floating rate revolving credit borrowings due 2015

  88  35  3.0  2.7 
  

Total

 $5,178 $5,535       
  

The debt of the consolidated CDOs has both fixed and floating interest rates, which range from 0% to 13.2%. The interest rates on the debt of consolidated investment entities are weighted average rates based on the outstanding principal and contractual interest rates. The carrying value of the debt of the consolidated CDOs represents the fair value of the aggregate debt as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. The carrying value of the floating rate revolving credit borrowings represents the outstanding principal amount of debt of certain consolidated pooled investment vehicles managed by Threadneedle. The fair value of this debt was $466 million and $364 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The consolidated pooled investment vehicles have entered into interest rate swaps and collars to manage the interest rate exposure on the floating rate revolving credit borrowings. The overall effective interest rate reflecting the impact of the derivative contracts was 5.0% and 5.5% as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, future maturities of debt were as follows:

 
 (in millions)
 
  

2012

 $ 

2013

  17 

2014

  378 

2015

  88 

2016

  1,097 

Thereafter

  4,221 
  

Total future maturities

 $5,801 
  

7.Table of Contents


5. Investments

The following is a summary of Ameriprise Financial investments:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Available-for-Sale securities, at fair value

 $22,873 $25,931 

Commercial mortgage loans, net

  2,887  3,097 

Trading securities

  501  504 

Policy loans

  729  706 

Other investments

  532  387 
      
 

Total

 $27,522 $30,625 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Available-for-Sale securities, at fair value

 $34,505 $32,619 

Commercial mortgage loans, net

  2,589  2,577 

Policy loans

  742  733 

Other investments

  939  826 
  

Total

 $38,775 $36,755 
  

Available-for-Sale SecuritiesThe following is a summary of net investment income:

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Investment income on fixed maturities

 $1,881 $1,920 $1,878 

Net realized gains

  6  33  53 

Affordable housing partnerships

  (32) (20) (25)

Other

  100  101  90 

Consolidated investment entities

  91  275  2 
  

Total net investment income

 $2,046 $2,309 $1,998 
  

Available-for-Sale securities distributed by type were as follows:

 
 December 31, 2008 
Description of Securities Amortized Cost Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
 
 (in millions)
 

Corporate debt securities

 $13,687 $86 $(1,174)$12,599 

Mortgage and other asset backed securities

  9,551  111  (736) 8,926 

State and municipal obligations

  1,024  4  (155) 873 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  257  14    271 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

  95  17  (5) 107 

Common and preferred stocks

  53  6  (22) 37 

Structured investments

  31  19    50 

Other debt

  10      10 
          
 

Total

 $24,708 $257 $(2,092)$22,873 
          

 
 December 31, 2011 
Description of Securities
 Amortized
Cost

 Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Fair Value
 Noncredit
OTTI(1)

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Corporate debt securities

 $16,380 $1,741 $(81)$18,040 $ 

Residential mortgage backed securities

  7,440  287  (331) 7,396  (139)

Commercial mortgage backed securities

  4,430  291  (2) 4,719   

Asset backed securities

  1,968  61  (44) 1,985  (15)

State and municipal obligations

  2,026  162  (58) 2,130   

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  61  10    71   

Foreign government bonds and obligations

  126  19  (1) 144   

Common stocks

  5  4    9   

Other debt obligations

  11      11   
  

Total

 $32,447 $2,575 $(517)$34,505 $(154)
  

 

 
 December 31, 2007 
Description of Securities Amortized Cost Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
 
 (in millions)
 

Corporate debt securities

 $14,158 $113 $(328)$13,943 

Mortgage and other asset backed securities

  10,517  38  (162) 10,393 

State and municipal obligations

  1,038  14  (17) 1,035 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  322  7  (1) 328 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

  97  15    112 

Common and preferred stocks

  53  6  (1) 58 

Structured investments

  46      46 

Other debt

  16      16 
          
 

Total

 $26,247 $193 $(509)$25,931 
          

 
 December 31, 2010 
Description of Securities
 Amortized
Cost

 Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Fair Value
 Noncredit
OTTI(1)

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Corporate debt securities

 $15,433 $1,231 $(58)$16,606 $ 

Residential mortgage backed securities

  7,213  368  (323) 7,258  (117)

Commercial mortgage backed securities

  4,583  293  (8) 4,868   

Asset backed securities

  1,982  78  (40) 2,020  (16)

State and municipal obligations

  1,666  21  (105) 1,582   

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  135  8    143   

Foreign government bonds and obligations

  91  17    108   

Common stocks

  6  4    10   

Other debt obligations

  24      24   
  

Total

 $31,133 $2,020 $(534)$32,619 $(133)
  
(1)
Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. Amount includes unrealized gains and losses on impaired securities subsequent to the initial impairment measurement date. These amounts are included in gross unrealized gains and losses as of the end of the period.

Table of Contents

At both December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, fixed maturity securities comprised approximately 83% and 85%89% of Ameriprise Financial investments. Rating agency designations are based on the availability of ratings from Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations ("NRSROs"), respectively, of the Company's total investments. These securities were rated byincluding Moody's andInvestors Service ("Moody's"), Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P"), except for approximately $1.2 billion and $1.4 billionFitch Ratings Ltd. ("Fitch"). The Company uses the median of available ratings from Moody's, S&P and Fitch, or, if fewer than three ratings are available, the lower rating is used. When ratings from Moody's, S&P and Fitch are unavailable, the Company may utilize ratings from other NRSROs or rate the securities atinternally. At both December 31, 20082011 and 2007, respectively, which were rated by2010, the Company's internal analysts rated $1.2 billion of securities, using criteria similar to Moody's and S&P. Ratings on investment grade securities are


Table of Contents


presented using S&P's convention and, if the two agencies' ratings differ, the lower rating is used.those used by NRSROs. A summary of fixed maturity securities by rating was as follows:

 
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 
Ratings Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Percent of
Total Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Percent of
Total Fair
Value
 
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

AAA

 $9,475 $8,988  40% $11,381 $11,277  44% 

AA

  1,698  1,571  7  2,637  2,613  10 

A

  4,689  4,396  19  4,292  4,253  16 

BBB

  7,299  6,707  29  6,150  6,069  24 

Below investment grade

  1,494  1,174  5  1,734  1,661  6 
              
 

Total fixed maturities

 $24,655 $22,836  100% $26,194 $25,873  100% 
              

 
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 
 
   
Ratings
 Amortized
Cost

 Fair Value
 Percent of
Total Fair
Value

 Amortized
Cost

 Fair Value
 Percent of
Total Fair
Value

 
  
 
 (in millions, except percentages)
 

AAA

 $11,510 $12,105  35%$12,142 $12,809  39%

AA

  1,942  2,087  6  1,843  1,899  6 

A

  5,012  5,442  16  4,449  4,670  14 

BBB

  11,818  13,050  38  10,536  11,408  35 

Below investment grade

  2,160  1,812  5  2,157  1,823  6 
  

Total fixed maturities

 $32,442 $34,496  100%$31,127 $32,609  100%
  

At December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, approximately 45%36% and 39%29%, respectively, of the securities rated AAA were GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC mortgage backed securities. No holdings of any other issuer were greater than 10% of shareholders'total equity.

The following tables provide information about Available-for-Sale securities with gross unrealized losses and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

 
 December 31, 2008 
 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
Description of Securities Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Corporate debt securities

 $6,250 $(396)$3,544 $(778)$9,794 $(1,174)

Mortgage and other asset backed securities

  1,611  (243) 2,014  (493) 3,625  (736)

State and municipal obligations

  438  (64) 295  (91) 733  (155)

U.S. government and agencies obligations

      11    11   

Foreign government bonds and obligations

  20  (5)     20  (5)

Common and preferred stocks

      27  (22) 27  (22)
              
 

Total

 $8,319 $(708)$5,891 $(1,384)$14,210 $(2,092)
              

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Less than 12 months
 12 months or more
 Total
 
 
   
Description of Securities
 Number of
Securities

 Fair Value
 Unrealized
Losses

 Number of
Securities

 Fair Value
 Unrealized
Losses

 Number of
Securities

 Fair Value
 Unrealized
Losses

 
  
 
 (in millions, except number of securities)
 

Corporate debt securities

  124 $1,647 $(40) 10 $259 $(41) 134 $1,906 $(81)

Residential mortgage backed securities

  105  1,269  (33) 141  717  (298) 246  1,986  (331)

Commercial mortgage backed securities

  14  182  (2) 5  29    19  211  (2)

Asset backed securities

  49  543  (11) 33  155  (33) 82  698  (44)

State and municipal obligations

        53  229  (58) 53  229  (58)

Foreign government bonds and obligations

  6  28  (1)       6  28  (1)
  

Total

  298 $3,669 $(87) 242 $1,389 $(430) 540 $5,058 $(517)
  

 

 
 December 31, 2007 
 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
Description of Securities Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Corporate debt securities

 $1,514 $(45)$8,159 $(283)$9,673 $(328)

Mortgage and other asset backed securities

  1,754  (73) 5,715  (89) 7,469  (162)

State and municipal obligations

  414  (15) 73  (2) 487  (17)

U.S. government and agencies obligations

      169  (1) 169  (1)

Foreign government bonds and obligations

      2    2   

Common and preferred stocks

  49  (1)     49  (1)
              
 

Total

 $3,731 $(134)$14,118 $(375)$17,849 $(509)
              


Table of Contents

In evaluating potential other-than-temporary impairments, the Company considers the extent to which amortized cost exceeds fair value and the duration of that difference. The following tables summarize the unrealized losses by ratio of fair value to amortized cost:

 
 December 31, 2008 
 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
Ratio of Fair Value
to Amortized Cost
 Number of
Securities
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Number of
Securities
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Number of
Securities
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
 
 (in millions, except number of securities)
 

95% - 100%

  328 $4,717 $(100) 105 $1,392 $(30) 433 $6,109 $(130)

90% - 95%

  169  1,980  (152) 64  1,117  (96) 233  3,097  (248)

80% - 90%

  162  974  (156) 124  1,624  (297) 286  2,598  (453)

Less than 80%

  108  648  (300) 281  1,758  (961) 389  2,406  (1,261)
                    
 

Total

  767 $8,319 $(708) 574 $5,891 $(1,384) 1,341 $14,210 $(2,092)
                    


 
 December 31, 2007 
 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
Ratio of Fair Value
to Amortized Cost
 Number of
Securities
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Number of
Securities
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Number of
Securities
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
 
 (in millions, except number of securities)
 

95% - 100%

  316 $2,774 $(39) 719 $12,682 $(208) 1,035 $15,456 $(247)

90% - 95%

  89  732  (57) 54  849  (60) 143  1,581  (117)

80% - 90%

  11  216  (32) 33  490  (70) 44  706  (102)

Less than 80%

  2  9  (6) 12  97  (37) 14  106  (43)
                    
 

Total

  418 $3,731 $(134) 818 $14,118 $(375) 1,236 $17,849 $(509)
                    
 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Less than 12 months
 12 months or more
 Total
 
 
   
Description of Securities
 Number of
Securities

 Fair Value
 Unrealized
Losses

 Number of
Securities

 Fair Value
 Unrealized
Losses

 Number of
Securities

 Fair Value
 Unrealized
Losses

 
  
 
 (in millions, except number of securities)
 

Corporate debt securities

  115 $1,859 $(46) 13 $157 $(12) 128 $2,016 $(58)

Residential mortgage backed securities

  108  782  (12) 133  712  (311) 241  1,494  (323)

Commercial mortgage backed securities

  30  498  (7) 1  23  (1) 31  521  (8)

Asset backed securities

  29  354  (8) 25  123  (32) 54  477  (40)

State and municipal obligations

  206  696  (31) 60  232  (74) 266  928  (105)
  

Total

  488 $4,189 $(104) 232 $1,247 $(430) 720 $5,436 $(534)
  

As part of the Company'sAmeriprise Financial's ongoing monitoring process, management determined that a majority of the gross unrealized losses on its Available-for-Sale securities are attributable to changesmovement in interest rates and credit spreads across sectors. spreads.


Table of Contents

The primary driver of increased unrealized losses during 2008 was the widening of credit spreads across sectors. A majorityfollowing table presents a rollforward of the unrealized lossescumulative amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008other-than-temporary impairments related to corporate debt securities and mortgage backed and asset backed securities. From an overall perspective, the gross unrealizedcredit losses were not concentrated in any individual industries or with any individual securities. The securities with a fair value to amortized cost ratio of 80-90% primarily related to the banking, communications, energy, and utility industries. The total gross unrealized loss related to the banking industry was $91 million. The securities with a fair value to amortized cost ratio of less than 80% primarily related to the consumer cyclical, communications, real estate investment trusts, consumer non-cyclical, financial, and basic industries. The total gross unrealized losses related to the consumer cyclical industry were $129 million. The largest unrealized loss associated with an individual issuer, excluding GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC mortgage backed securities, was $41 million. The securities related to this issuer have a fair value to amortized cost ratio of 54% and have been in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months. The Company believes that it will collect all principal and interest due on all investments that have amortized cost in excess of fair value. In addition, the Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until anticipated recovery which may not be until maturity.

The Company regularly reviews Available-for-Sale securities for impairments in value considered to be other-than-temporary. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Company's evaluation of potential other-than-temporary impairments.

The Company's total mortgage and asset backed exposure at December 31, 2008 was $8.9 billion, which included $5.2 billion of residential mortgage backed securities and $2.7 billion of commercial mortgage backed securities. At December 31, 2008, residential mortgage backed securities included $4.0 billion of agency-backed securities, $0.7 billion of Alt-A securities and $0.5 billion of prime, non-agency securities. With respect to the Alt-A securities, the majority are rated AAA. Nonea portion of the structures are levered, and the majority of the AAA-rated holdings are "super senior" bonds, meaning they have more collateral support or credit enhancement than required to receive a AAA rating. The prime, non-agency securities are a seasoned portfolio, almost entirely 2005 and earlier production, with the vast majority AAA-rated. With regard to asset backed securities, the Company's exposure at December 31, 2008securities' total other-than-temporary impairments was $1.0 billion, which included $0.2 billion of securities backed by subprime collateral. These securities are predominantly AAA-rated bonds backed by seasoned, traditional, first lien collateral. Holdings include both floating rate and short-duration, fixed securities. The Company has norecognized in other structured or hedge fund investments with exposure to subprime residential mortgages.comprehensive income:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Beginning balance

 $297 $263 $258 

Credit losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized

  15  15  8 

Credit losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized

  19  19  57 

Reductions for securities sold during the period (realized)

  (28)   (60)
  

Ending balance

 $303 $297 $263 
  

The change in net unrealized securities gains (losses) in other comprehensive income (loss) includes three components, net of tax: (i) unrealized gains (losses) that arose from changes in the market value of securities that were held during the period


Table of Contents


(holding gains (losses));period; (ii) (gains) losses that were previously unrealized, but have been recognized in current period net income due to sales and other-than-temporary impairments of Available-for-Sale securities (reclassificationand due to the reclassification of realized gains (losses));noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses to credit losses and (iii) other items primarily consisting of adjustments in asset and liability balances, such as DAC, DSIC, benefit reserves and annuity liabilitiesreinsurance recoverables, to reflect the expected impact on their carrying values had the unrealized gains (losses) been realized as of the respective balance sheet dates.

The following table presents the componentsa rollforward of the net unrealized securities gains (losses), net of tax, on Available-for-Sale securities included in accumulated other comprehensive loss:income (loss):

 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized securities losses at January 1

 $(168)$(187)$(129)

Holding gains (losses), net of tax of $796, $20, and $54, respectively

  (1,479) 38  (101)

Reclassification of realized losses (gains), net of tax of $265, $16, and $17, respectively

  492  (29) (33)

DAC, DSIC and annuity liabilities, net of tax of $104, $6, and $41, respectively

  194  10  76 
        
 

Net unrealized securities losses at December 31

 $(961)$(168)$(187)
        

 
 Net
Unrealized
Securities
Gains (Losses)

 Deferred
Income Tax

 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss) Related to Net
Unrealized Securities
Gains (Losses)

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1, 2009

 $(1,479)$518 $(961)

Cumulative effect of accounting change

  (203) 71  (132)(1)

Net unrealized securities gains arising during the period(3)

  2,792  (977) 1,815 

Reclassification of gains included in net income

  (70) 25  (45)

Impact of DAC, DSIC, benefit reserves and reinsurance recoverables

  (566) 199  (367)
  

Balance at December 31, 2009

  474  (164) 310(2)

Net unrealized securities gains arising during the period(3)

  828  (291) 537 

Reclassification of gains included in net income

  (28) 10  (18)

Impact of DAC, DSIC, benefit reserves and reinsurance recoverables

  (328) 114  (214)
  

Balance at December 31, 2010

  946  (331) 615(2)

Net unrealized securities gains arising during the period(3)

  572  (196) 376 

Impact of DAC, DSIC, benefit reserves and reinsurance recoverables

  (340) 119  (221)
  

Balance at December 31, 2011

 $1,178 $(408)$770(2)
  
(1)
Amount represents the cumulative effect of adopting a new accounting standard on January 1, 2009. See Note 3 for additional information on the adoption impact.

(2)
Includes $(75) million, $(66) million and $(84) million of noncredit related impairments on securities and net unrealized securities losses on previously impaired securities at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(3)
Includes other-than-temporary impairment losses on Available-for-Sale securities related to factors other than credit that were recognized in other comprehensive income during the period.

Net realized gains and losses on Available-for-Sale securities, determined using the specific identification method, recognized in earnings were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Gross realized gains

 $52 $72 $216 

Gross realized losses

  (18) (7) (53)

Other-than-temporary impairments

  (34) (37) (93)
  

Other-than-temporary impairments for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 primarily related to credit losses on non-agency residential mortgage backed securities. Other-than-temporary impairments for the year ended December 31,


Table of Contents

2009 related to credit losses on non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, corporate debt securities primarily in the financial services and gaming industries and other structured investments.

Available-for-Sale securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 20082011 were as follows:

 
 Amortized Cost Fair Value 
 
 (in millions)
 

Due within one year

 $1,727 $1,711 

Due after one year through five years

  7,989  7,450 

Due after five years through 10 years

  3,168  2,753 

Due after 10 years

  2,189  1,946 
      

  15,073  13,860 

Mortgage and other asset backed securities

  9,551  8,926 

Structured investments

  31  50 

Common and preferred stocks

  53  37 
      
 

Total

 $24,708 $22,873 
      

 
 Amortized Cost
 Fair Value
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Due within one year

 $975 $992 

Due after one year through five years

  6,544  6,783 

Due after five years through 10 years

  6,408  7,125 

Due after 10 years

  4,677  5,496 
  

  18,604  20,396 

Residential mortgage backed securities

  7,440  7,396 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

  4,430  4,719 

Asset backed securities

  1,968  1,985 

Common stocks

  5  9 
  

Total

 $32,447 $34,505 
  

The expected payments onActual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities and other asset backed securities and structured investments mayare not coincide with their contractual maturities.due at a single maturity date. As such, these securities, as well as common and preferred stocks, were not included in the maturities distribution.

Net realized gains
6. Financing Receivables

The Company's financing receivables include commercial mortgage loans, syndicated loans, consumer bank loans, policy loans and losses on Available-for-Sale securities, determined usingmargin loans. See Note 2 for information regarding the specific identification method, were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Gross realized gains from sales

 $16 $73 $66 

Gross realized losses from sales

  (11) (24) (14)

Other-than-temporary impairments

  (762) (5) (2)

The $762 million of other-than-temporary impairments in 2008 primarilyCompany's accounting policies related to credit-relatedloans and the allowance for loan losses.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables present a rollforward of the allowance for loan losses on non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, corporate debt securities primarily infor the financial servicesyears ended and gaming industriesthe ending balance of the allowance for loan losses by impairment method and asset backed and other securities. The $5 milliontype of other-than-temporary impairments in 2007 related to corporate debt securities in the publishing and home building industries. The $2 million of other-than-temporary impairments in 2006 related to a corporate bond held in a consolidated CDO which was deconsolidated in 2007.loan:

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Commercial
Mortgage
Loans

 Syndicated
Loans

 Consumer
Bank
Loans

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Beginning balance

 $38 $10 $16 $64 

Charge-offs

  (2)   (12) (14)

Recoveries

      1  1 

Provisions

  (1) (1) 11  9 
  

Ending balance

 $35 $9 $16 $60 
  

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $10 $1 $1 $12 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  25  8  15  48 
  


 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Commercial
Mortgage
Loans

 Syndicated
Loans

 Consumer
Bank
Loans

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Beginning balance

 $32 $26 $13 $71 

Charge-offs

  (2) (5) (12) (19)

Recoveries

      1  1 

Provisions

  8  (11) 14  11 
  

Ending balance

 $38 $10 $16 $64 
  

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $8 $1 $2 $11 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  30  9  14  53 
  

Table of Contents

Commercial Mortgage Loans, Net

The following is a summaryrecorded investment in financing receivables by impairment method and type of commercial mortgage loans:loan was as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Commercial mortgage loans

 $2,906 $3,115 

Less: allowance for loan losses

  (19) (18)
      

Commercial mortgage loans, net

 $2,887 $3,097 
      

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Commercial
Mortgage
Loans

 Syndicated
Loans

 Consumer
Bank
Loans

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $68 $5 $11 $84 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  2,556  359  1,369  4,284 
  

Total

 $2,624 $364 $1,380 $4,368 
  

Commercial mortgage loans are first mortgages on real estate. The Company holds

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Commercial
Mortgage
Loans

 Syndicated
Loans

 Consumer
Bank
Loans

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $75 $8 $12 $95 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  2,540  303  1,054  3,897 
  

Total

 $2,615 $311 $1,066 $3,992 
  

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the mortgage documents,Company's recorded investment in financing receivables individually evaluated for impairment for which gives it the right to take possession of the property if the borrower fails to perform according to the terms of the agreements.

The balances of and changes in thethere was no related allowance for loan losses was $13 million and $24 million, respectively. Unearned income, unamortized premiums and discounts, and net unamortized deferred fees and costs are not material to the Company's total loan balance.

Purchases and sales of loans were as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1

 $18 $40 $44 

Provision for loan losses

  1  (22)  

Foreclosures, write-offs and loan sales

      (4)
        

Balance at December 31

 $19 $18 $40 
        

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Purchases

       

Consumer bank loans

 $373 $283 

Syndicated loans

  194  59 
  

Total loans purchased

 $567 $342 
  

Sales

       

Consumer bank loans

 $209 $415 

Syndicated loans

  2  40 
  

Total loans sold

 $211 $455 
  

ConcentrationsThe Company has not acquired any loans with deteriorated credit quality as of the acquisition date.

Credit Quality Information

Nonperforming loans, which are generally loans 90 days or more past due, were $20 million and $15 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. All other loans were considered to be performing.

Commercial Mortgage Loans

The Company reviews the credit worthiness of the borrower and the performance of the underlying properties in order to determine the risk of loss on commercial mortgage loans. Based on this review, the commercial mortgage loans are assigned an internal risk rating, which management updates as necessary. Commercial mortgage loans which management has assigned its highest risk rating were 3% of total commercial mortgage loans at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. Loans with the highest risk rating represent distressed loans which the Company has identified as impaired or expects to become delinquent or enter into foreclosure within the next six months. In addition, the Company reviews the concentrations of credit risk of commercial mortgage loans by region were as follows:and property type.

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 On-Balance
Sheet
 Funding
Commitments
 On-Balance
Sheet
 Funding
Commitments
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Commercial mortgage loans by U.S. region:

             
 

Atlantic

 $924 $3 $984 $22 
 

North Central

  666  10  736  33 
 

Mountain

  340  11  369  9 
 

Pacific

  480  20  492  21 
 

South Central

  307    323  8 
 

New England

  189    211  8 
          

  2,906  44  3,115  101 

Less: allowance for loan losses

  (19)   (18)  
          
 

Total

 $2,887 $44 $3,097 $101 
          

Table of Contents

Concentrations of credit risk of commercial mortgage loans by U.S. region were as follows:

 
 Loans
 Percentage
 
 
   
 
 December 31,
 December 31,
 
 
   
 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

East North Central

 $252 $242  10% 9%

East South Central

  65  66  2  3 

Middle Atlantic

  223  215  9  8 

Mountain

  284  301  11  11 

New England

  141  156  5  6 

Pacific

  584  541  22  21 

South Atlantic

  648  625  25  24 

West North Central

  244  271  9  10 

West South Central

  183  198  7  8 
  

  2,624  2,615  100% 100%
          

Less: allowance for loan losses

  35  38       
        

Total

 $2,589 $2,577       
        

Concentrations of credit risk of commercial mortgage loans by property type were as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 On-Balance
Sheet
 Funding
Commitments
 On-Balance
Sheet
 Funding
Commitments
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Commercial mortgage loans by U.S. property type:

             
 

Office buildings

 $817 $18 $932 $12 
 

Shopping centers and retail

  896  23  897  66 
 

Apartments

  414  1  461  8 
 

Industrial buildings

  512  2  549  9 
 

Hotels and motels

  79    81   
 

Medical buildings

  41    54   
 

Other

  147    141  6 
          

  2,906  44  3,115  101 

Less: allowance for loan losses

  (19)   (18)  
          
 

Total

 $2,887 $44 $3,097 $101 
          

 
 Loans
 Percentage
 
 
   
 
 December 31,
 December 31,
 
 
   
 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Apartments

 $392 $351  15% 13%

Hotel

  51  57  2  2 

Industrial

  480  475  18  18 

Mixed Use

  42  43  2  2 

Office

  694  747  26  29 

Retail

  845  843  32  32 

Other

  120  99  5  4 
  

  2,624  2,615  100% 100%
          

Less: allowance for loan losses

  35  38       
        

Total

 $2,589 $2,577       
        

Commitments to fund commercial mortgages were madeSyndicated Loans

The Company's syndicated loan portfolio is diversified across industries and issuers. The primary credit indicator for syndicated loans is whether the loans are performing in accordance with the ordinary coursecontractual terms of business. The funding commitmentsthe syndication. Total nonperforming syndicated loans at both December 31, 20082011 and 2007 approximate fair value.2010 were $3 million.

Trading SecuritiesConsumer Bank Loans

Net recognizedThe Company considers the credit worthiness of borrowers (FICO score), collateral characteristics such as LTV and geographic concentration in determining the allowance for loan losses related to trading securities were $88 million atfor residential mortgage loans, credit cards and other consumer bank loans. At a minimum, management updates FICO scores and LTV ratios semiannually.

As of both December 31, 20082011 and net recognized gains were $3 million2010, approximately 7% of residential mortgage loans and $41 millioncredit cards and other consumer bank loans had FICO scores below 640. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately 2% and 3%, respectively, of the Company's residential mortgage loans had LTV ratios greater than 90%. The Company's most significant geographic concentration for consumer bank loans is in California representing 38% and 33% of the yearsportfolio as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No other state represents more than 10% of the total consumer bank loan portfolio.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

During the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

8. Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducement Costs

During the third quarter of 2008,2011 the Company completedrestructured 119 loans with a recorded investment of $52 million as of December 31, 2011. Of the annual detailed reviewtotal restructured loans, 11 loans were commercial mortgage loans with a recorded investment of valuation assumptions for products$51 million as of RiverSource Life companies. In addition, during the third quarter of 2008, the Company convertedDecember 31, 2011. The troubled debt restructurings did not have a material impact to a new industry standard valuation system that provides enhanced modeling capabilities.

The total pretax impacts on the Company's assets and liabilities attributable to the review of valuation assumptionsallowance for products of RiverSource Life companies and the valuation system conversion during the third quarter of 2008 and the review of the valuation assumptions for products of RiverSource Life companies during the third quarter of 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

Balance Sheet Impact Debit (Credit) DAC Other
Assets
 Other
Liabilities
 Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims
 Receivables Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

2008 period

 $(82)$(5)$5 $96 $92 $106 

2007 period

  (16) 3    (15) (2) (30)

2006 period

  38      (12) (1) 25 

The total pretax impacts on the Company's revenues and expenses attributable to the review of valuation assumptions for products of RiverSource Life companies and the valuation system conversionloan losses or income recognized for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the2011. There are no material commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans have been restructured.


Table of Contents


review of the valuation assumptions for products of RiverSource Life companies for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

Pretax Benefit (Charge) Premiums Other
Revenues
 Benefits,
Claims, Losses,
and Settlement
Expenses
 Amortization
of DAC
 Distribution
Expenses
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

2008 period

 $2 $95 $90 $(82)$1 $106 

2007 period

    (2) (12) (16)   (30)

2006 period

    (1) (12) 38    25 

The balances of and changes in DAC were as follows:

 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1

 $4,503 $4,499 $4,182 

Cumulative effect of accounting change

  36  (204)  

Capitalization of acquisition costs

  648  771  744 

Amortization, excluding impacts of valuation assumptions review and valuation system conversion

  (851) (535) (510)

Amortization, impact of valuation assumptions review and valuation system conversion

  (82) (16) 38 

Impact of change in net unrealized securities losses (gains)

  228  (12) 45 
        

Balance at December 31

 $4,482 $4,503 $4,499 
        

The balances of and changes in DSIC were as follows:

 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1

 $511 $452 $370 

Cumulative effect of accounting change

  9  (11)  

Capitalization of sales inducements

  87  124  126 

Amortization, excluding impacts of valuation assumptions review and valuation system conversion

  (115) (56) (48)

Amortization, impact of valuation assumptions review and valuation system conversion

  (6) 3   

Impact of change in net unrealized securities losses (gains)

  32  (1) 4 
        

Balance at December 31

 $518 $511 $452 
        

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 and recorded as a cumulative change in accounting principle a pretax increase of $36 million and $9 million to DAC and DSIC, respectively. See Note 3 and Note 18 for additional information regarding SFAS 157.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SOP 05-1 and recorded as a cumulative change in accounting principle a pretax reduction of $204 million and $11 million to DAC and DSIC, respectively.

9. Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill and other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are instead subject to impairment tests. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 the tests did not indicate impairment. Identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives acquired during the year ended December 31, 2008 included contracts of $9 million and trade name assets of $10 million. The gross carrying amount of these assets was $19 million as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.


Table of Contents

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill reported in the Company's four main operating segments were as follows:

 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management
 Asset
Management
 Annuities Protection Consolidated 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1, 2007(1)

 $98 $449 $46 $45 $638 

Acquisitions

    4      4 

Foreign currency translation and other adjustments

    1      1 
            

Balance at December 31, 2007(1)

  98  454  46  45  643 

Acquisitions

  200  354      554 

Foreign currency translation and other adjustments

    (106)     (106)
            

Balance at December 31, 2008

 $298 $702 $46 $45 $1,091 
            
(1)
Balances have been reclassified between segments.

Definite-lived intangible assets consisted of the following:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Carrying
Amount
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Carrying
Amount
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Customer relationships

 $89 $(16)$73 $40 $(17)$23 

Contracts

  178  (64) 114  153  (61) 92 

Other

  133  (39) 94  146  (41) 105 
              
 

Total

 $400 $(119)$281 $339 $(119)$220 
              

Definite-lived intangible assets acquired during the year ended December 31, 2008 were as follows:

 
 Amount assigned Weighted-average
Amortization Period
 
 
 (in millions)
 (in years)
 

Customer relationships

 $22  12 

Contracts

  65  13 

Other

  59  13 
      
 

Total

 $146  13 
      

The impact on net definite-lived intangible assets due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates was a decrease of $53 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and an increase of $3 million and $29 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $25 million, $27 million and $20 million, respectively. In 2008 and 2007, the Company had impairment charges of $8 million and $1 million, respectively, related to Asset Management contracts.



Table of Contents

Estimated intangible amortization expense as of December 31, 2008, for the next five years was as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

2009

 $29 

2010

  28 

2011

  26 

2012

  26 

2013

  13 

10.7. Reinsurance

Generally, the Company reinsures 90% of the death benefit liability related to almost all individual fixed and variable universal life and term life insurance products. As a result, the Company typically retains and is at risk for, at most, 10% of each policy's death benefit from the first dollar of coverage for new sales of these policies, subject to the reinsurers fulfilling their obligations. The Company began reinsuring risks at this level beginning induring 2001 (2002 for RiverSource Life of NY) for term life insurance and 2002 (2003 for RiverSource Life of NY) for individual fixed and variable universal life insurance. Policies issued prior to these dates are not subject to these same reinsurance levels. Generally, the maximum amount of life insurance risk retained by the Company is $1.5 million (increased from $750,000 during 2008) on a single life and $1.5 million on any flexible premium survivorship life policy. Risk on fixed and variable universal life policies is reinsured on a yearly renewable term basis. Risk on most term life policies starting in 2001 (2002 for RiverSource Life of NY) is reinsured on a coinsurance basis, a type of reinsurance in which the reinsurer participates proportionally in all material risks and premiums associated with a policy.

For existing long term careLTC policies, RiverSource Life (and RiverSource Life of NY for 1996 and later issues)the Company retained 50% of the risk and ceded the remaining 50% of the risk on a coinsurance basis to a subsidiarysubsidiaries of Genworth Financial, Inc. ("Genworth").

In addition, the Company assumes life insurance For RiverSource Life of NY, this reinsurance arrangement applies for 1996 and fixed annuity risk under reinsurance arrangements with unaffiliated insurance companies.later issues only.

Generally, the Company retains at most $5,000 per month of risk per life on disability incomeDI policies sold on policy forms introduced in most states in October 2007 in most states(August 2010 for RiverSource Life of NY) and reinsures the remainder of the risk on a coinsurance basis with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. The Company retains all risk for new claims on disability incomeDI contracts sold on other policy forms. The Company also retains all risk on accidental death benefit claims and substantially all risk associated with waiver of premium provisions.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, traditional life and UL insurance in force aggregated $191.2 billion and $192.0 billion, respectively, of which $136.2 billion and $134.0 billion were reinsured at the respective year ends. Life insurance in force is reported on a statutory basis.

The Company also reinsures a portion of the risks associated with its personal auto, home and homeumbrella insurance products through twothree types of reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. The Company purchases reinsurance with a limit of $4.6$5 million per loss and the Company retains $400,000$750,000 per loss. The Company purchases catastrophe reinsurance with a limit of $90 million per event and retains $10 million of loss per event with loss recovery up to $80 million per event. Those limits change in 2012 to $110 million and $20 million, respectively. The Company also cedes 90% of every personal umbrella loss with a limit of $5 million.

The effect of reinsurance on premiums was as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Direct premiums

 $1,253 $1,211 $1,194 

Reinsurance assumed

  2  2  3 

Reinsurance ceded

  (164) (150) (127)
        

Net premiums

 $1,091 $1,063 $1,070 
        

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Direct premiums

 $1,421 $1,382 $1,317 

Reinsurance ceded

  (201) (203) (219)
  

Net premiums

 $1,220 $1,179 $1,098 
  

Cost of insurance and administrative charges on universalUL and variable universal lifeVUL insurance are reflected in other revenues and were $672net of reinsurance ceded of $71 million, $519$67 million and $477$62 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively. These amounts were net of reinsurance ceded of $61

Reinsurance recovered from reinsurers was $201 million, $57$172 million and $55$174 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006, respectively. Reinsurance recovered from reinsurers was $151 million, $130 million and $129 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,2009, respectively. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve the Company from its primary obligation to policyholders.

Receivables included $1.6$2.0 billion and $1.3$1.9 billion of reinsurance recoverables as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively, including $1.2$1.5 billion and $1.0$1.4 billion recoverable from Genworth, respectively. Included in future policy benefits


Table of Contents


and claims were $689$629 million and $730$657 million related to assumed reinsurance arrangements as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively.


11.Table of Contents


8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are instead subject to impairment tests. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the tests did not indicate impairment.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill reported in the Company's main operating segments were as follows:

 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management

 Asset
Management

 Annuities
 Protection
 Consolidated
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1, 2010

 $257 $739 $46 $45 $1,087 

Acquisitions

    97      97 

Foreign currency translation

    (11)     (11)

Purchase price adjustments

  (2) (10)     (12)
  

Balance at December 31, 2010

  255  815  46  45  1,161 

Acquisitions

    6      6 

Foreign currency translation

    (2)     (2)

Purchase price adjustments

    (1)     (1)
  

Balance at December 31, 2011

 $255 $818 $46 $45 $1,164 
  

On April 30, 2010, the Company acquired the long-term asset management business of Columbia Management from Bank of America. The acquisition has enhanced the scale and performance of the Company's retail mutual fund and institutional asset management businesses. The Company recorded the assets and liabilities acquired at fair value and allocated the remaining costs to goodwill and intangible assets.

As of both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the carrying amount of indefinite-lived intangible assets included $630 million of investment management contracts and $67 million of trade names. Identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives acquired during the year ended December 31, 2010 included $615 million of investment management contracts and $57 million of trade names.

Definite-lived intangible assets consisted of the following:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
 
   
 
 Gross
Carrying
Amount

 Accumulated
Amortization

 Net
Carrying
Amount

 Gross
Carrying
Amount

 Accumulated
Amortization

 Net
Carrying
Amount

 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Customer relationships

 $145 $(69)$76 $150 $(38)$112 

Contracts

  233  (122) 111  233  (103) 130 

Other

  150  (55) 95  143  (60) 83 
  

Total

 $528 $(246)$282 $526 $(201)$325 
  

Definite-lived intangible assets acquired during the year ended December 31, 2011 were $2 million with a weighted average amortization period of 5 years. In 2011, the Company did not record any purchase price adjustments to definite-lived intangible assets. The increase (decrease) to the net carrying amount of definite-lived intangible assets due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates was nil, $(5) million and $13 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $45 million, $46 million and $32 million, respectively. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not record any impairment charges on definite-lived intangible assets.

Estimated intangible amortization expense as of December 31, 2011 for the next five years is as follows:

 
 (in millions)
 
  

2012

 $46 

2013

  45 

2014

  40 

2015

  31 

2016

  27 
  

Table of Contents


9. Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducement Costs

During the third quarter of 2011, 2010 and 2009, management reviewed and updated the DAC and DSIC valuation assumptions for the Company's products. As part of its third quarter 2010 process, management extended the projection periods used for its annuity products and revised client asset value growth rates assumed for variable annuity and VUL contracts.

The balances of and changes in DAC were as follows:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1

 $4,619 $4,334 $4,383 

Capitalization of acquisition costs

  492  525  620 

Amortization, excluding the impact of valuation assumptions review

  (567) (450) (336)

Amortization, impact of valuation assumptions review

  (51) 323  119 

Impact of change in net unrealized securities gains

  (91) (113) (452)
  

Balance at December 31

 $4,402 $4,619 $4,334 
  

The balances of and changes in DSIC, which is included in other assets, were as follows:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1

 $545 $524 $518 

Capitalization of sales inducement costs

  9  35  82 

Amortization, excluding the impact of valuation assumptions review

  (70) (49) (19)

Amortization, impact of valuation assumptions review

  (11) 52  9 

Impact of change in net unrealized securities gains

  (9) (17) (66)
  

Balance at December 31

 $464 $545 $524 
  

As described in Note 3, the Company adopted a new accounting standard on the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption had no net impact to DAC and DSIC.


10. Future Policy Benefits and Claims and Separate Account Liabilities

Future policy benefits and claims consisted of the following:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Fixed annuities

 $14,058 $14,382 

Equity indexed annuities accumulated host values

  228  253 

Equity indexed annuities embedded derivatives

  16  53 

Variable annuities fixed sub-accounts

  5,623  5,419 

Variable annuity GMWB

  1,471  136 

Variable annuity GMAB

  367  33 

Other variable annuity guarantees

  67  27 
      
 

Total annuities

  21,830  20,303 
      

Variable universal life ("VUL")/universal life ("UL") insurance

  2,526  2,568 

Other life, disability income and long term care insurance

  4,397  4,106 

Auto, home and other insurance

  368  378 

Policy claims and other policyholders' funds

  172  91 
      
 

Total

 $29,293 $27,446 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Fixed annuities

 $16,401 $16,520 

EIA accumulated host values

  58  100 

EIA embedded derivatives

  2  3 

Variable annuity fixed sub-accounts

  4,852  4,868 

Variable annuity GMWB

  1,377  337 

Variable annuity GMAB

  237  104 

Other variable annuity guarantees

  14  13 
  

Total annuities

  22,941  21,945 
  

VUL/UL insurance

  2,662  2,588 

IUL accumulated host values

  4   

IUL embedded derivatives

  3   

VUL/UL insurance additional liabilities

  220  143 

Other life, disability income and long term care insurance

  5,352  5,004 

Auto, home and other insurance

  420  394 

Policy claims and other policyholders' funds

  121  134 
  

Total

 $31,723 $30,208 
  

Table of Contents

Separate account liabilities consisted of the following:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Variable annuity variable sub-accounts

 $37,657 $51,764 

VUL insurance variable sub-accounts

  4,091  6,244 

Other insurance variable sub-accounts

  39  62 

Threadneedle investment liabilities

  2,959  3,904 
      
 

Total

 $44,746 $61,974 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Variable annuity variable sub-accounts

 $57,556 $57,862 

VUL insurance variable sub-accounts

  5,575  5,887 

Other insurance variable sub-accounts

  43  46 

Threadneedle investment liabilities

  3,606  4,535 
  

Total

 $66,780 $68,330 
  

Fixed Annuities

Fixed annuities include both deferred and payout contracts. Deferred contracts offer a guaranteed minimum rate of interest and security of the principal invested. Payout contracts guarantee a fixed income payment for life or the term of the contract. The Company generally invests the proceeds from the annuity payments in fixed rate securities. The Company may hedge the interest rate risks under these obligations were partially hedgedrelated to fixed annuities with derivative instruments designated as a cash flow hedge of the interest credited on forecasted sales.instruments. As of January 1, 2007, theDecember 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no outstanding derivatives to hedge designation was removed. See Note 20 for additional information regarding the Company's derivative instruments.these risks.

Equity Indexed Annuities

The Index 500 Annuity, the Company's equity indexed annuityEIA product, is a single premium deferred fixed annuity. The contract is issued with an initial term of seven years and interest earnings are linked to the S&P 500 Index. This annuity has a minimum interest rate guarantee of 3% on 90% of the initial premium, adjusted for any surrenders. The Company generally invests the proceeds from the annuity deposits in fixed rate securities and hedges the equity risk with derivative instruments. See Note 2015 for additional information regarding the Company's derivative instruments.


Table In 2007, the Company discontinued new sales of Contentsequity indexed annuities.

Variable Annuities

Purchasers of variable annuities can select from a variety of investment options and can elect to allocate a portion to a fixed account. A vast majority of the premiums received for variable annuity contracts are held in separate accounts where the assets are held for the exclusive benefit of those contractholders.

Most of the variable annuity contracts issued by the Company contain one or more guaranteed benefits, including GMWB, GMAB, GMDB and GGU provisions. The Company previously offered contracts with GMIB provisions. See Note 2 and Note 1211 for additional information regarding the Company's variable annuity guarantees. The Company does not currently hedge its risk under the GMDB, GGU and GMIB provisions. The total value of variable annuity contracts with GMWB riders decreased from $13.1 billion at December 31, 2007 to $12.7 billion at December 31, 2008. The total value of variable annuity contracts with GMAB riders decreased from $2.3 billion at December 31, 2007 to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2008. See Note 2015 for additional information regarding derivative instruments used to hedge risks related to GMWB and GMAB risk.provisions.

Insurance Liabilities

VUL/UL is the largest group of insurance policies written by the Company. Purchasers of VUL can select from a variety of investment options and can elect to allocate a portion to a fixed account or a separate account. A vast majority of the premiums received for VUL contracts are held in separate accounts where the assets are held for the exclusive benefit of those policyholders. In 2011, the Company began offering IUL insurance. IUL is similar to UL in that it provides life insurance coverage and cash value that increases as a result of credited interest. Also, like UL, there is a minimum guaranteed credited rate of interest. Unlike UL the rate of credited interest above the minimum guarantee is linked to the S&P 500 Index (subject to a cap). The Company also offers term and whole life insurance as well as disability products. The Company no longer offers long term careLTC products but has in force policies from prior years. Insurance liabilities include accumulation values, unpaid reported claims, incurred but not reported claims and obligations for anticipated future claims.

Portions of the Company's fixed and variable universal life contracts have product features that result in profits followed by losses from the insurance component of the contract. These profits followed by losses can be generated by the cost structure of the product or secondary guarantees in the contract. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges.


Table of Contents

Threadneedle Investment Liabilities

Threadneedle provides a range of unitized pooled pension funds, which invest in property, stocks, bonds and cash. These funds are part of the long term business fund of Threadneedle's subsidiary, Threadneedle Pensions Limited. The investments are selected by the clients and are based on the level of risk they are willing to assume. All investment performance, net of fees, is passed through to the investors. The value of the liabilities represents the value of the units in issue of the pooled pension funds.

12.
11. Variable Annuity and Insurance Guarantees

The majority of the variable annuity contracts offered by the Company contain GMDB provisions. The Company also offers variable annuities with death benefit provisions that gross up the amount payable by a certain percentage of contract earnings, which are referred to as GGU, benefits. In addition, the Company offers contracts with GMWB and GMAB provisions. The Company previously offered contracts containing GMIB provisions. See Note 2 and Note 1110 for additional information regarding the liabilities related toCompany's variable annuity guarantees.

The GMDB provisions provide a specified minimum return upon death of the contractholder. The death benefit payable is the greater of (i) the contract value less any purchase payment credits subject to recapture and less a pro-rata portion of any rider fees, or (ii) the GMDB provisions specified in the contract. The Company has three primary GMDB provisions:

Return of premium—premium — provides purchase payments minus adjusted partial surrenders.

Reset—Reset — provides that the value resets to the account value every sixth contract anniversary minus adjusted partial surrenders. This provision is often provided in combination with the return of premium provision. This provision is no longer offered.

Ratchet—Ratchet — provides that the value ratchets up to the maximum account value at specified anniversary intervals, plus subsequent purchase payments less adjusted partial surrenders.

The variable annuity contracts with GMWB riders typically have account values that are based on an underlying portfolio of mutual funds, the values of which fluctuate based on equity marketfund performance. At issue, the guaranteed amount is equal to the amount deposited but the guarantee may be increased annually to the account value (a "step-up") in the case of favorable market performance.

The Company has GMWB offered initially guarantees thatriders in force, which contain one or more of the contractholder can withdraw 7%following provisions:

Withdrawals at a specified rate per year until the amount withdrawn is equal to the guaranteed amount, regardless of the performance of the underlying funds. In 2006, the Company began offering an enhanced withdrawal benefit that gives contractholdersamount.

Withdrawals at a choice to withdraw 6%specified rate per year for the life of the contractholder ("GMWB for life") or 7%.

Withdrawals at a specified rate per year until the amount withdrawn is equal to the guaranteed amount. In 2007, the Company added a new GMWB benefit design that is available in afor joint version that promises 6% withdrawalscontractholders while either contractholder remainsis alive. In addition, once

Withdrawals based on performance of the contract.

Withdrawals based on the age withdrawals begin.

Once withdrawals begin, the contractholder's funds are moved to one of the three lessleast aggressive asset allocation models (of the five that are available prior to withdrawal).


Table

Credits are applied annually for a specified number of Contents

years to increase the guaranteed amount as long as withdrawals have not been taken.

Variable annuity contractholders age 79 or younger at contract issue can also obtain a principal-back guarantee by purchasing the optional GMAB rider for an additional charge. The GMAB rider guarantees that, regardless of market performance at the end of the 10-year waiting period, the contract value will be no less than the original investment or 80% of the highest anniversary value, adjusted for withdrawals. If the contract value is less than the guarantee at the end of the 10 year period, a lump sum will be added to the contract value to make the contract value equal to the guarantee value.

Certain universal lifeUL contracts offered by the Company provide secondary guarantee benefits. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges.


Table of Contents

The following table provides summary information related to all variable annuity guarantees for which the Company has established additional liabilities:

 
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 
Variable annuity
guarantees by
benefit type(1)
 Total
contract
value
 Contract
value in
separate
accounts
 Net
amount
at risk(2)
 Weighted
average
attained age
 Total
contract
value
 Contract
value in
separate
accounts
 Net
amount
at risk(2)
 Weighted
average
attained age
 
 
 (in millions, except age)
 

GMDB:

                         
 

Return of Premium

 $22,249 $20,153 $4,873  61 $25,804 $23,892 $26  60 
 

Six-Year Reset

  12,719  10,063  2,802  61  20,231  17,617  167  60 
 

One-Year Ratchet

  5,770  5,061  2,163  62  7,908  7,143  81  61 
 

Five-Year Ratchet

  951  888  199  59  1,211  1,163  1  58 
 

Other

  471  429  192  66  693  639  12  65 
                  
  

Total—GMDB

 $42,160 $36,594 $10,229  61 $55,847 $50,454 $287  60 
                  

GGU death benefit

 
$

699
 
$

619
 
$

65
  
63
 
$

950
 
$

873
 
$

80
  
62
 
                  

GMIB

 
$

567
 
$

511
 
$

245
  
63
 
$

927
 
$

859
 
$

18
  
62
 
                  

GMWB:

                         
 

GMWB

 $3,513 $3,409 $1,312  63 $5,104 $4,980 $22  62 
 

GMWB for life

  9,194  8,764  2,704  63  7,958  7,685  33  62 
                  
  

Total—GMWB

 $12,707 $12,173 $4,016  63 $13,062 $12,665 $55  62 
                  

GMAB

 
$

2,006
 
$

1,937
 
$

608
  
56
 
$

2,260
 
$

2,205
 
$

3
  
55
 
                  

 
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 
 
   
Variable Annuity Guarantees by
Benefit Type(1)

 Total
Contract
Value

 Contract
Value in
Separate
Accounts

 Net
Amount
at Risk(2)

 Weighted
Average
Attained
Age

 Total
Contract
Value

 Contract
Value in
Separate
Accounts

 Net
Amount
at Risk(2)

 Weighted
Average
Attained
Age

 
  
 
 (in millions, except age)
 

GMDB:

                         

Return of premium

 $40,011 $38,275 $382  63 $37,714 $36,028 $173  62 

Five/six-year reset

  11,631  9,118  350  63  13,689  11,153  312  62 

One-year ratchet

  7,233  6,777  479  64  7,741  7,242  287  63 

Five-year ratchet

  1,472  1,418  25  61  1,466  1,414  8  60 

Other

  759  732  93  68  680  649  61  67 
  

Total — GMDB

 $61,106 $56,320 $1,329  63 $61,290 $56,486 $841  62 
  

GGU death benefit

 $920 $868 $78  63 $970 $912 $79  64 

GMIB

 $463 $433 $106  65 $597 $561 $76  64 

GMWB:

                         

GMWB

 $3,887 $3,868 $236  65 $4,341 $4,317 $106  64 

GMWB for life

  23,756  23,625  863  64  20,374  20,259  129  63 
  

Total — GMWB

 $27,643 $27,493 $1,099  64 $24,715 $24,576 $235  63 
  

GMAB

 $3,516 $3,509 $63  56 $3,540 $3,523 $22  56 
  
(1)
Individual variable annuity contracts may have more than one guarantee and therefore may be included in more than one benefit type. Variable annuity contracts for which the death benefit equals the account value are not shown in this table.

(2)
Represents the current guaranteed benefit amount in excess of the current contract value. GMIB, GMWB and GMAB benefits are subject to waiting periods and payment periods specified in the contract. As a result of the recent market decline, the amount by which guarantees exceed the accumulation value has increased significantly.

Changes in additional liabilities (assets)for variable annuity and insurance guarantees were as follows:

 
 GMDB & GGU GMIB GMWB GMAB UL 
 
 (in millions)
 

Liability (asset) balance on January 1, 2007

 $26 $5 $(12)$(5)$1 

Incurred claims

  1    148  38  4 

Paid claims

  (3) (2)     (1)
            

Liability balance at December 31, 2007

  24  3  136  33  4 

Incurred claims

  58  10  1,335  334  6 

Paid claims

  (27) (1)     (3)
            

Liability balance at December 31, 2008

 $55 $12 $1,471 $367 $7 
            

 
 GMDB & GGU
 GMIB
 GMWB
 GMAB
 UL
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1, 2009

 $55 $12 $1,471 $367 $7 

Incurred claims

  12  (5) (1,267) (267) 8 

Paid claims

  (61) (1)      
  

Balance at December 31, 2009

  6  6  204  100  15 

Incurred claims

  17  3  133  4  59 

Paid claims

  (18) (1)     (6)
  

Balance at December 31, 2010

  5  8  337  104  68 

Incurred claims

  10  2  1,040  133  53 

Paid claims

  (10) (1)     (10)
  

Balance at December 31, 2011

 $5 $9 $1,377 $237 $111 
  

The liabilities for guaranteed benefits are supported by general account assets.


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the distribution of separate account balances by asset type for variable annuity contracts providing guaranteed benefits:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Mutual funds:

       
 

Equity

 $21,899 $34,540 
 

Bond

  12,135  12,549 
 

Other

  3,463  4,478 
      

Total mutual funds

 $37,497 $51,567 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Mutual funds:

       

Equity

 $30,738 $32,310 

Bond

  23,862  22,319 

Other

  1,969  2,208 
  

Total mutual funds

 $56,569 $56,837 
  

No gains or losses were recognized on assets transferred to separate accounts for the periods presented.years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.


13.Table of Contents



12. Customer Deposits

Customer deposits consisted of the following:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Fixed rate certificates

 $3,909 $2,616 

Stock market based certificates

  909  1,031 

Stock market embedded derivative reserve

  5  32 

Other

  62  78 

Less: accrued interest classified in other liabilities

  (11) (18)
      
 

Total investment certificate reserves

  4,874  3,739 
      

Brokerage deposits

  1,988  1,100 

Banking deposits

  1,367  1,367 
      
 

Total

 $8,229 $6,206 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Fixed rate certificates

 $2,004 $2,313 

Stock market certificates

  731  790 

Stock market embedded derivative reserve

  6  14 

Other

  36  43 

Less: accrued interest classified in other liabilities

  (5) (19)
  

Total investment certificate reserves

  2,772  3,141 
  

Brokerage deposits

  2,341  2,116 

Banking deposits

  4,737  3,522 
  

Total

 $9,850 $8,779 
  

Investment Certificates

The Company offers fixed rate investment certificates primarily in amounts ranging from $1,000 to $1 million with interest crediting rate terms ranging from threesix to 36 months. Investment certificates may be purchased either with a lump sum payment or installment payments. Certificate product owners are entitled to receive, at maturity, a definite sum of money. Payments from certificate owners are credited to investment certificate reserves. Investment certificate reserves generally accumulate interest at specified percentage rates. Reserves are maintained for advance payments made by certificate owners, accrued interest thereon and for additional credits in excess of minimum guaranteed rates and accrued interest thereon. On certificates allowing for the deduction of a surrender charge, the cash surrender values may be less than accumulated investment certificate reserves prior to maturity dates. Cash surrender values on certificates allowing for no surrender charge are equal to certificate reserves. The Company generally invests the proceeds from investment certificates in fixed and variable rate securities. The Company may hedge the interest rate risks under these obligations with derivative instruments. As of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, there were no outstanding derivatives to hedge these interest rate risks.

Certain investment certificate products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. The Company guarantees the principal for purchasers who hold the certificate for the full 52-week term and purchasers may participate in increases in the stock market based on the S&P 500 Index, up to a maximum return. Purchasers can choose 100% participation in the market index up to the cap or 25% participation plus fixed interest with a combined total up to the cap. Current in forcefirst term certificates have maximum returns of 6% or 7%2% to 3%. The equity component of these certificates is considered an embedded derivative and is accounted for separately. The change in fair values of the embedded derivative reserve is reflected in banking and deposit interest expense. See Note 2015 for additionadditional information about derivative instruments used to economically hedge the equity price risk related to the Company's stock market certificates.

Brokerage Deposits

Brokerage deposits are amounts payable to brokerage customers related to free credit balances, funds deposited by customers and funds accruing to customers as a result of trades or contracts. The Company pays interest on certain customer credit balances and the interest is included in banking and deposit interest expense.

Banking Deposits

Banking deposits primarily include customer deposits in money market, savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit held at Ameriprise Bank. The Company pays interest on certain customer balances and the interest is included in banking and deposit interest expense.


Table of Contents

14.
13. Debt

DebtThe balances and the stated interest rates of outstanding debt of Ameriprise Financial were as follows:

 
 Outstanding Balance
December 31,
 Stated Interest Rate
December 31,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Senior notes due 2010

 $800 $800  5.4% 5.4%

Senior notes due 2015

  700  700  5.7  5.7 

Junior subordinated notes due 2066

  457  500  7.5  7.5 

Municipal bond inverse floater certificates due 2021

  6  18  2.2  3.7 

Floating rate revolving credit borrowings due 2013

  64    3.6   
            

Total

 $2,027 $2,018       
            

 
 Outstanding Balance
 Stated Interest Rate
 
 
   
 
 December 31,
 December 31,
 
 
   
 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Senior notes due 2015

 $753(1)$728(1) 5.7% 5.7%

Senior notes due 2019

  341(1) 312(1) 7.3  7.3 

Senior notes due 2020

  805(1) 763(1) 5.3  5.3 

Senior notes due 2039

  200  200  7.8  7.8 

Junior subordinated notes due 2066

  294  308  7.5  7.5 

Municipal bond inverse floater certificates due 2021

    6    0.3 
  

Total long-term debt

  2,393  2,317       

Short-term borrowings

  504  397  0.3  0.3 
  

Total

 $2,897 $2,714       
  
(1)
Amounts include adjustments for fair value hedges on the Company's long-term debt and any unamortized discounts. See Note 15 for information on the Company's fair value hedges.

Long-term debt

On November 23, 2005, the Company issued $1.5 billion of unsecured senior notes ("senior notes") including $800 million of five-year senior notes which maturematured November 15, 2010 and $700 million of 10-year senior notes which mature November 15, 2015, and incurred debt issuance costs of $7 million. Interest payments are due semi-annually on May 15 and November 15.

In June 2005,November 2010, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements totaling $1.5 billion, which qualified as cash flow hedges related to planned debt offerings. The Company terminated the swap agreements in November 2005 when theretired $340 million of its senior notes were issued. The related gain ondue 2010. In July 2009, the swap agreementsCompany purchased $450 million aggregate principal amount of $71 million was recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income and is being amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the period in which the hedged cash flows are expected to occur. Considering the impact of the hedge credits, the effective interest rates on theits senior notes due 2010, pursuant to a cash tender offer. The tender offer consideration per $1,000 principal amount of these notes accepted for purchase was $1,000, with an early tender payment of $30. Payments for these notes pursuant to the tender offer included accrued and 2015unpaid interest from the last interest payment date to, but not including, the settlement date. The Company also purchased $10 million of these notes in the second quarter of 2009 in open market transactions.

On June 8, 2009, the Company issued $300 million of unsecured senior notes which mature June 28, 2019, and incurred debt issuance costs of $3 million. Interest payments are 4.8%due semi-annually in arrears on June 28 and 5.2%, respectively.December 28.

On March 11, 2010, the Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes which mature March 15, 2020, and incurred debt issuance costs of $6 million. Interest payments are due semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15.

On June 3, 2009, the Company issued $200 million of unsecured senior notes which mature June 15, 2039, and incurred debt issuance costs of $6 million. Interest payments are due quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15.

On May 26, 2006, the Company issued $500 million of unsecured junior subordinated notes, ("junior notes"), which mature June 1, 2066, and incurred debt issuance costs of $6 million. For the initial 10-year period, the junior notes carry a fixed interest rate of 7.5% payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1. From June 1, 2016 until the maturity date, interest on the junior notes will accrue at an annual rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus a margin equal to 290.5 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. The Company has the option to defer interest payments, subject to certain limitations. In addition, interest payments are mandatorily deferred if the Company does not meet specified capital adequacy, net income or shareholders' equity levels. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had met the specified levels.

In the fourth quarter of 2008,2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company extinguished $43$14 million, $14 million and $135 million, respectively, of its junior notes in open market transactions and recognized a gaingains (losses) of $19nil, $(1) million and $58 million, respectively, in other revenues.

TheDuring the first quarter of 2011, the Company extinguished $6 million of its municipal bond inverse floater certificates mature in 2021 and are non-recourse debt obligationsfunded through the call of a consolidated structured entity supported by a $10 million portfolio of municipal bonds.

The floating rate revolving credit borrowings at December 31, 2008 are non-recourse debt related to certain consolidated property funds. The debt is due in 2013 and will be extinguished with the cash flows from the sale of the investments held within the partnerships.

On September 30, 2005, the Company obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility for $750 million expiring in September 2010 from various third party financial institutions. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may increase the amount of this facility to $1.0 billion. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no borrowings were outstanding under this facility. Outstanding letters of credit issued against this facility were $2 million and $6 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company has agreed under this credit agreement not to pledge the shares of its principal subsidiaries and was in compliance with this covenant as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2008,2011, future maturities of Ameriprise Financial long-term debt were as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

2009

 $ 

2010

  800 

2011

   

2012

   

2013

  64 

Thereafter

  1,163 
    

Total future maturities

 $2,027 
    

 
 (in millions)
 
  

2012

 $ 

2013

   

2014

   

2015

  700 

2016

   

Thereafter

  1,544 
  

Total future maturities

 $2,244 
  

15. Related Party TransactionsShort-term borrowings

The Company may engageenters into repurchase agreements in transactions in the ordinary course of business with significant shareholders or their subsidiaries, between the Company and its directors and officers or with other companies whose directors or officers may also serveexchange for cash, which it accounts for as directors or officers for the Company or its subsidiaries.secured borrowings. The Company carries out these transactions on customary terms. Other than forhas pledged Available-for-Sale securities consisting of agency residential mortgage backed securities and commercial mortgage backed securities to collateralize its obligation under the share repurchase from Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and subsidiaries described below, the transactions have not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire") and subsidiaries owned less than 5%agreements. The fair value of the Company's common stocksecurities pledged is recorded in investments and was $521 million and $412 million at December 31, 2008, 20072011 and 2006 and 12%2010, respectively. The stated interest rate of the Company's common stock at December 31, 2005. short-term borrowings is a weighted average annualized interest rate on repurchase agreements held as of the balance sheet date.

On March 29, 2006,November 22, 2011, the Company entered into a Stock Purchasecredit agreement for $500 million expiring on November 22, 2015. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may increase the amount of this facility to $750 million upon satisfaction of certain approval requirements. Available borrowings under the agreement are reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. The Company had no borrowings outstanding under this facility and Sale Agreementoutstanding letters of credit issued against this facility were $2 million as of December 31, 2011.


14. Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; that is, an exit price. The exit price assumes the asset or liability is not exchanged subject to a forced liquidation or distressed sale.

Valuation Hierarchy

The Company categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used by the Company's valuation techniques. A level is assigned to each fair value measurement based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date.

Level 2


Prices or valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 3


Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses valuation techniques consistent with Warren E. Buffetthe market and Berkshireincome approaches to repurchase 6.4 million sharesmeasure the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The Company's market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company's income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future projected cash flows to a single discounted present value amount. When applying either approach, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs.

The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.


Table of Contents

Assets

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Actively traded money market funds are measured at their net asset value ("NAV") and classified as Level 1. The Company's remaining cash equivalents are classified as Level 2 and measured at amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization.

Investments (Trading Securities and Available-for-Sale Securities)

When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 1 securities primarily include U.S. Treasuries. Level 2 securities primarily include residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, and U.S. agency and foreign government securities. The fair value of these Level 2 securities is based on a market approach with prices obtained from third party pricing services. Observable inputs used to value these securities can include, but are not limited to reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads and non-binding broker quotes. Level 3 securities primarily include certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities and corporate bonds. The fair value of corporate bonds and certain asset backed securities classified as Level 3 is typically based on a single non-binding broker quote. The fair value of certain asset backed securities and non-agency residential mortgage backed securities is obtained from third party pricing services who use significant unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value.

Prices received from third party pricing services are subjected to exception reporting that identifies investments with significant daily price movements as well as no movements. The Company reviews the exception reporting and resolves the exceptions through reaffirmation of the price or recording an appropriate fair value estimate. The Company also performs subsequent transaction testing. The Company performs annual due diligence of third party pricing services. The Company's due diligence procedures include assessing the vendor's valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies, and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions and unobservable assumptions, if any, employed in the valuation methodology. The Company also considers the results of its exception reporting controls and any resulting price challenges that arise.

Separate Account Assets

The fair value of assets held by separate accounts is determined by the NAV of the funds in which those separate accounts are invested. The NAV represents the exit price for the separate account. Separate account assets are classified as Level 2 as they are traded in principal-to-principal markets with little publicly released pricing information.

Investments Segregated for Regulatory Purposes

When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 2 securities include agency mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, and U.S. agency and foreign government securities.

Other Assets

Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as foreign currency forwards, or derivatives that are exchange-traded are classified as Level 1 measurements. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter markets are generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The counterparties' nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative assets was immaterial at December 31, 2011 and 2010. See Note 15 for further information on the credit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale consist of cash equivalents of Securities America.


Table of Contents

Liabilities

Future Policy Benefits and Claims

The Company values the embedded derivative liability attributable to the provisions of certain variable annuity riders using internal valuation models. These models calculate fair value by discounting expected cash flows from benefits plus margins for profit, risk and expenses less embedded derivative fees. The projected cash flows used by these models include observable capital market assumptions (such as, market implied equity volatility and the LIBOR swap curve) and incorporate significant unobservable inputs related to contractholder behavior assumptions (such as withdrawals and lapse rates) and margins for risk, profit and expenses that the Company believes an exit market participant would expect. The fair value of these embedded derivatives also reflects a current estimate of the Company's common stock.nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. Given the significant unobservable inputs to this valuation, these measurements are classified as Level 3. The repurchaseembedded derivative liability attributable to these provisions is recorded in future policy benefits and claims. The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the provisions of its equity indexed annuity and indexed universal life products. The inputs to these calculations are primarily market observable and include interest rates, volatilities, and equity index levels. As a result, these measurements are classified as Level 2.

Customer Deposits

The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the provisions of its stock market certificates. The inputs to these calculations are primarily market observable and include interest rates, volatilities and equity index levels. As a result, these measurements are classified as Level 2.

Other Liabilities

Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as foreign currency forwards, or derivatives that are exchange-traded are classified as Level 1 measurements. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter markets are generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The Company's nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative liabilities was completedimmaterial at December 31, 2011 and 2010. See Note 15 for further information on March 29, 2006the credit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.

Securities sold but not yet purchased include highly liquid investments which are short-term in nature. Securities sold but not yet purchased are measured using amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization and are classified as Level 2.


Table of Contents

The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities of Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a price per sharerecurring basis:

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Cash equivalents

 $20 $2,287 $ $2,307 

Available-for-Sale securities:

             

Corporate debt securities

    16,685  1,355  18,040 

Residential mortgage backed securities

    7,198  198  7,396 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

    4,669  50  4,719 

Asset backed securities

    1,779  206  1,985 

State and municipal obligations

    2,130    2,130 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  22  49    71 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

    144    144 

Common stocks

  2  2  5  9 

Other debt obligations

    11    11 
  

Total Available-for-Sale securities

  24  32,667  1,814  34,505 

Trading securities

  1  30    31 

Separate account assets

    66,780    66,780 

Investments segregated for regulatory purposes

    293    293 

Other assets:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    1,958    1,958 

Equity derivative contracts

  274  1,077    1,351 

Credit derivative contracts

    1    1 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

    7    7 

Commodity derivative contracts

    2    2 
  

Total other assets

  274  3,045    3,319 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $319 $105,102 $1,814 $107,235 
  

Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims:

             

EIA embedded derivatives

 $ $2 $ $2 

IUL embedded derivatives

    3    3 

GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives

      1,585  1,585 
  

Total future policy benefits and claims

    5  1,585  1,590(1)

Customer deposits

    6    6 

Other liabilities:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    1,209    1,209 

Equity derivative contracts

  297  764    1,061 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  3  10    13 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other liabilities

  300  1,985    2,285 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $300 $1,996 $1,585 $3,881 
  
(1)
The Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $506 million cumulative decrease to the embedded derivative liability.

Table of Contents

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Cash equivalents

 $42 $2,481 $ $2,523 

Available-for-Sale securities:

             

Corporate debt securities

    15,281  1,325  16,606 

Residential mortgage backed securities

    3,011  4,247  7,258 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

    4,817  51  4,868 

Asset backed securities

    1,544  476  2,020 

State and municipal obligations

    1,582    1,582 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  64  79    143 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

    108    108 

Common stocks

  2  3  5  10 

Other debt obligations

    24    24 
  

Total Available-for-Sale securities

  66  26,449  6,104  32,619 

Trading securities

    43    43 

Separate account assets

    68,330    68,330 

Investments segregated for regulatory purposes

    298    298 

Other assets:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    438    438 

Equity derivative contracts

  32  420    452 

Credit derivative contracts

    4    4 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  1      1 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other assets

  33  864    897 

Assets held for sale

    15    15 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $141 $98,480 $6,104 $104,725 
  

Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims:

             

EIA embedded derivatives

 $ $3 $ $3 

GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives

      421  421 
  

Total future policy benefits and claims

    3  421  424(1)

Customer deposits

    14    14 

Other liabilities:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    379    379 

Equity derivative contracts

  18  722    740 

Credit derivative contracts

    1    1 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  1      1 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other liabilities

  19  1,104    1,123 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $19 $1,121 $421 $1,561 
  
(1)
The Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $197 million cumulative decrease to the embedded derivative liability.

Table of Contents

The following tables provide a summary of changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities of Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 Available-for-Sale Securities Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims: GMWB
and GMAB
Embedded
Derivatives

 
 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Residential
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Commercial
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Asset
Backed
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Total
 
 
   
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2011

 $1,325 $4,247 $51 $476 $5 $6,104 $(421)

Total gains (losses) included in:

                      

Net income

  7  48    8    63(1) (1,007)(2)

Other comprehensive income

  11  (110)   (18)   (117)  

Purchases

  189  556  104  118    967   

Sales

  (51) (2)       (53)  

Issues

              (149)

Settlements

  (122) (885) (4) (87)   (1,098) (8)

Transfers into Level 3

  7    1  14    22   

Transfers out of Level 3

  (11) (3,656) (102) (305)   (4,074)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2011

 $1,355 $198 $50 $206 $5 $1,814 $(1,585)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2011 included in:

                      

Net investment income

 $ $(32)$ $1 $ $(31)$ 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

              (1,035)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 
 Available-for-Sale Securities Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims: GMWB
and GMAB
Embedded
Derivatives

 
 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Residential
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities
 Asset
Backed
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Other
Structured
Investments

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 $1,252 $3,982 $72 $455 $4 $58 $5,823 $(299)

Total gains included in:

                         

Net income

  1  55  1  12      69(1) 4(2)

Other comprehensive income

  30  292  10  38  1    371   

Purchases, sales, issues and settlements, net

  17  (61) 112  (5)   (58)(3) 5  (126)

Transfers into Level 3

  25            25   

Transfers out of Level 3

    (21) (144) (24)     (189)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $1,325 $4,247 $51 $476 $5 $ $6,104 $(421)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2010 included in:

                         

Net investment income

 $ $54 $ $11 $ $ $65 $ 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

                (15)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)
Represents the elimination of Ameriprise Financial's investment in CDOs, which were consolidated due to the adoption of a new accounting standard. See Note 2 and Note 4 for additional information related to the consolidation of CDOs.

The impact to pretax income of the Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk on the fair value of its GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives was an increase of $168 million and $28 million, net of DAC and DSIC amortization, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2011 transfers out of Level 3 to Level 2 included certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and sub-prime non-agency residential mortgage backed securities classified as asset backed securities with a fair value of approximately $3.9 billion. The transfers reflect improved pricing transparency of these


Table of Contents

securities, a continuing trend of increased activity in the non-agency residential mortgage backed security market and increased observability of significant inputs to the valuation methodology. All other securities transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 represent securities with fair values that are now obtained from a third party pricing service with observable inputs. Securities transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 represent securities with fair values that are now based on a single non-binding broker quote.

The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the beginning of the quarter in which each transfer occurred.

During the reporting periods, there were no material assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

The following table provides the carrying value and the estimated fair value of financial instruments that are not reported at fair value. All other financial instruments that are reported at fair value have been included above in the table with balances of assets and liabilities Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 
 
   
 
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Financial Assets

             

Commercial mortgage loans, net

 $2,589 $2,772 $2,577 $2,671 

Policy loans

  742  715  733  808 

Receivables

  2,444  2,148  1,852  1,566 

Restricted and segregated cash

  1,500  1,500  1,516  1,516 

Assets held for sale

      18  18 

Other investments and assets

  390  388  331  338 

Financial Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims

 $15,064 $16,116 $15,328 $15,768 

Investment certificate reserves

  2,766  2,752  3,127  3,129 

Banking and brokerage customer deposits

  7,078  7,091  5,638  5,642 

Separate account liabilities

  3,950  3,950  4,930  4,930 

Debt and other liabilities

  3,180  3,412  2,722  2,919 
  

Investments

The fair value of commercial mortgage loans, except those with significant credit deterioration, is determined by discounting contractual cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for loans with similar remaining maturities and characteristics including loan-to-value ratio, occupancy rate, refinance risk, debt-service coverage, location, and property condition. For commercial mortgage loans with significant credit deterioration, fair value is determined using the same adjustments as above with an additional adjustment for the Company's estimate of the amount recoverable on the loan.

The fair value of policy loans is determined using discounted cash flows.

Receivables

The fair value of consumer bank loans is determined by discounting estimated cash flows and incorporating adjustments for prepayment, administration expenses, severity and credit loss estimates, with discount rates based on the Company's estimate of current market conditions.

Loans held for sale are measured at the lower of cost or market and fair value is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics.

Brokerage margin loans are measured at outstanding balances, which are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the sufficiency of the collateral and short term nature of these loans.

Restricted and Segregated Cash

Restricted and segregated cash is generally set aside for specific business transactions and restrictions are specific to the Company and do not transfer to third party market participants; therefore, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Amounts segregated under federal and other regulations may also reflect resale agreements and are measured at the cost at which the securities will be sold. This measurement is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between entering into the transaction and its expected realization and the reduced risk of credit loss due to pledging U.S. government-backed securities as collateral.


Table of Contents

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale reflect notes receivable of Securities America. See Note 1 and Note 24 for additional information on the Company's presentation of discontinued operations.

Other Investments and Assets

Other investments and assets primarily consist of syndicated loans. The fair value of syndicated loans is obtained from a third party pricing service.

Future Policy Benefits and Claims

The fair value of fixed annuities, in deferral status, is determined by discounting cash flows using a risk neutral discount rate with adjustments for profit margin, expense margin, early policy surrender behavior, a provision for adverse deviation from estimated early policy surrender behavior, and the Company's nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. The fair value of other liabilities including non-life contingent fixed annuities in payout status, equity indexed annuity host contracts and the fixed portion of a small number of variable annuity contracts classified as investment contracts is determined in a similar manner.

Customer Deposits

The fair value of investment certificate reserves is determined by discounting cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for assets with similar terms and characteristics, with adjustments for early withdrawal behavior, penalty fees, expense margin and the Company's nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities.

Banking and brokerage customer deposits are liabilities with no defined maturities and fair value is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.

Separate Account Liabilities

Certain separate account liabilities are classified as investment contracts and are carried at an amount equal to the March 29, 2006 closing pricerelated separate account assets. Carrying value is a reasonable estimate of $42.91.the fair value as it represents the exit value as evidenced by withdrawal transactions between contractholders and the Company. A nonperformance adjustment is not included as the related separate account assets act as collateral for these liabilities and minimize nonperformance risk.

Debt and Other Liabilities

The Company's executive officersfair value of long-term debt is based on quoted prices in active markets, when available. If quoted prices are not available fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques such as present value of cash flows.

The fair value of short-term borrowings is obtained from a third party service. A nonperformance adjustment is not included as collateral requirements for these borrowings minimize the nonperformance risk.

The fair value of future funding commitments to affordable housing partnerships is determined by discounting cash flows.


Table of Contents


15. Derivatives and directors may have transactions withHedging Activities

Derivative instruments enable the Company to manage its exposure to various market risks. The value of such instruments is derived from an underlying variable or its subsidiaries involving financialmultiple variables, including equity, foreign exchange and interest rate indices or prices. The Company primarily enters into derivative agreements for risk management purposes related to the Company's products and insurance services. All obligations arising from theseoperations.

The Company uses derivatives as economic hedges and accounting hedges. The following table presents the balance sheet location and the gross fair value of derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives:

 
  
 Asset  
 Liability 
 
  
 December 31,  
 December 31, 
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments

 Balance Sheet
Location

 Balance Sheet
Location

 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
  
 (in millions)
 

Cash flow hedges

                 

Asset-based distribution fees

 Other assets $ $10 

Other liabilities

 $ $ 

Interest on debt

 Other assets     

Other liabilities

  11   

Fair value hedges

                 

Fixed rate debt

 Other assets  157  61 

Other liabilities

     
  

Total qualifying hedges

    157  71    11   
  

Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

GMWB and GMAB

                 

Interest rate contracts

 Other assets  1,801  366 

Other liabilities

  1,198  379 

Equity contracts

 Other assets  1,314  354 

Other liabilities

  1,031  665 

Credit contracts

 Other assets  1  4 

Other liabilities

    1 

Foreign currency contracts

 Other assets  7   

Other liabilities

  10   

Embedded derivatives(1)

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  1,585  421 
  

Total GMWB and GMAB

    3,123  724    3,824  1,466 
  

Other derivatives:

                 

Interest rate

                 

Interest rate lock commitments

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

     

Equity

                 

EIA

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

     

EIA embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  2  3 

IUL

 Other assets  1   

Other liabilities

     

IUL embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  3   

Stock market certificates

 Other assets  34  89 

Other liabilities

  29  75 

Stock market certificates embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Customer deposits

  6  14 

Ameriprise Financial

                 

Franchise Advisor Deferred

                 

Compensation Plan

 Other assets  2  8 

Other liabilities

     

Seed money

 Other assets     

Other liabilities

  1   

Foreign exchange

                 

Foreign currency

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

  3  1 

Commodity

                 

Seed money

 Other assets  2   

Other liabilities

     
  

Total other

    39  100    44  93 
  

Total non-designated hedges

    3,162  824    3,868  1,559 
  

Total derivatives

   $3,319 $895   $3,879 $1,559 
  

N/A Not applicable.

(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.

See Note 14 for additional information regarding the Company's fair value measurement of derivative instruments.


Table of Contents


Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges

The following table presents a summary of the impact of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31:

 
  
 Amount of Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives Recognized in Income
 
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments

 Location of Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives Recognized in Income

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
 

GMWB and GMAB

            

Interest rate contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses $709 $95 $(435)

Equity contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  326  (370) (1,245)

Credit contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (12) (44) (65)

Foreign currency contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (2)    

Embedded derivatives(1)

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (1,165) (121) 1,533 
  

Total GMWB and GMAB

    (144) (440) (212)
  

Other derivatives:

            

Interest rate

            

Interest rate lock commitments

 Other revenues  (1)    

Equity

            

GMDB

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses    (4) (10)

EIA

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  (1) 2  4 

EIA embedded derivatives

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  1  7  7 

IUL

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  1     

IUL embedded derivatives

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  (3)    

Stock market certificates

 Banking and deposit interest expense  1  9  15 

Stock market certificates embedded derivatives

 Banking and deposit interest expense    (10) (18)

Seed money

 Net investment income  4  (5) (14)

Ameriprise Financial

            

Franchise Advisor Deferred

            

Compensation Plan

 Distribution expenses  (4) 9   

Foreign exchange

            

Seed money

 General and administrative expense  (1) 1   

Foreign currency

 Net investment income  (3) (1)  

Commodity

            

Seed money

 Net investment income  1     
  

Total other

    (5) 8  (16)
  

Total derivatives

   $(149)$(432)$(228)
  
(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.

The Company holds derivative instruments that either do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. These derivative instruments are used as economic hedges of equity, interest rate, credit and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to various products and transactions are inof the ordinary courseCompany.

The majority of the Company's businessannuity contracts contain GMDB provisions, which may result in a death benefit payable that exceeds the contract accumulation value when market values of customers' accounts decline. Certain annuity contracts contain GMWB or GMAB provisions, which guarantee the right to make limited partial withdrawals each contract year regardless of the volatility inherent in the underlying investments or guarantee a minimum accumulation value of consideration received at the beginning of the contract period, after a specified holding period, respectively. The Company economically hedges the exposure related to non-life contingent GMWB and GMAB provisions primarily using various futures, options, interest rate swaptions, interest rate swaps, variance swaps and credit default swaps. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the gross notional amount of derivative contracts for the Company's GMWB and GMAB provisions was $104.7 billion and $55.5 billion, respectively. The Company had previously entered into a limited number of derivative contracts to economically hedge equity exposure related to GMDB provisions on variable annuity contracts written in 2009. As of both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not have any outstanding hedges on its GMDB provisions.


Table of Contents

The deferred premium associated with some of the above options is paid or received semi-annually over the life of the option contract. The following is a summary of the payments the Company is scheduled to make and receive for these options:

 
 Premiums Payable
 Premiums Receivable
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

2012

 $372 $41 

2013

  349  26 

2014

  324  24 

2015

  296  22 

2016

  265  15 

2017-2026

  925  34 
  

Actual timing and payment amounts may differ due to future contract settlements, modifications or exercises of options prior to the full premium being paid or received.

EIA, IUL and stock market certificate products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. As a result of fluctuations in equity markets, the obligation incurred by the Company related to EIA, IUL and stock market certificate products will positively or negatively impact earnings over the life of these products. As a means of economically hedging its obligations under the provisions of these products, the Company enters into index options and futures contracts. The gross notional amount of these derivative contracts was $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company enters into forward contracts, futures, total return swaps and commodity swaps to manage its exposure to price risk arising from seed money investments in proprietary investment products. The gross notional amount of these contracts was $123 million and $174 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to economically hedge its exposure to certain receivables and obligations denominated in non-functional currencies. The gross notional amount of these contracts was $26 million and $21 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In 2010, the Company entered into a total return swap to economically hedge its exposure to equity price risk of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common stock granted as part of its Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan ("Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan"). In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company extended the contract through 2012. As part of the contract, the Company expects to cash settle the difference between the value of a fixed number of shares at the contract date (which may be increased from time to time) and the value of those shares over an unwind period ending on December 31, 2012. The gross notional value of this contract was $17 million and $35 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Embedded Derivatives

Certain annuities contain GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions, which are considered embedded derivatives. In addition, the equity component of the EIA, IUL and stock market certificate product obligations are also considered embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are bifurcated from their host contracts and reported on the sameConsolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. As discussed above, the Company uses derivatives to mitigate the financial statement impact of these embedded derivatives.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company has designated and accounts for the following as cash flow hedges: (i) interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate exposure on debt, (ii) interest rate lock agreements to hedge interest rate exposure on debt issuances and (iii) swaptions used to hedge the risk of increasing interest rates on forecasted fixed premium product sales. The Company previously designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges interest rate swaps to hedge certain asset-based distribution fees.

During the second quarter of 2011, the Company reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings a $27 million gain on an interest rate hedge put in place in anticipation of issuing debt between December 2010 and September 2011. The gain was reclassified due to the forecasted transaction not occurring according to the original hedge strategy. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, amounts recognized in earnings related to cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness were not material. The estimated net amount of existing pretax losses on December 31, 2011 that the Company expects to reclassify to earnings within the next twelve months is $2 million, which consists of $4 million of pretax gains to be recorded as a reduction to interest and debt expense and $6 million of pretax losses to be recorded in net investment income. The following tables present the impact of the effective portion of the


Table of Contents

Company's cash flow hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31:

 
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Interest on debt

 $(11)$16 $19 

Asset-based distribution fees

  1  20   
  

Total

 $(10)$36 $19 
  


 
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income into Income
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income into Income

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Other revenues

 $27 $ $ 

Interest and debt expense

  4  8  8 

Distribution fees

  9  11   

Net investment income

  (6) (6) (6)
  

Total

 $34 $13 $2 
  

The following is a summary of unrealized derivatives gains (losses) included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to cash flow hedges:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at January 1

 $18 $3 $(8)

Holding gains (losses)

  (10) 36  19 

Reclassification of realized gains

  (34) (13) (2)

Income tax benefit (provision)

  15  (8) (6)
  

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at December 31

 $(11)$18 $3 
  

Currently, the longest period of time over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 24 years and relates to forecasted debt interest payments.

Fair Value Hedges

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company entered into and designated as fair value hedges three interest rate swaps to convert senior notes due 2015, 2019 and 2020 from fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. The swaps have identical terms as the underlying debt being hedged so no ineffectiveness is expected to be realized. The Company recognizes gains and losses on the derivatives and the related hedged items within interest and debt expense. The following table presents the amounts recognized in effectincome related to fair value hedges for comparable transactionsthe years ended December 31:

 
  
 Amount of Gain Recognized
in Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 Location of Gain Recorded into Income
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
 

Fixed rate debt

 Interest and debt expense $41 $36 

Credit Risk

Credit risk associated with the general public. Such obligations involve normal risksCompany's derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of collectionthe applicable derivative contract. To mitigate such risk, the Company has established guidelines and dooversight of credit risk through a comprehensive enterprise risk management program that includes members of senior management. Key components of this program are to require preapproval of counterparties and the use of master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements whenever practical. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company held $802 million and $98 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents and recorded a corresponding liability in other liabilities for collateral the Company is obligated to return to counterparties. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had accepted additional collateral consisting of various securities with a fair value of $186 million and $23 million, respectively, which are not have features or terms that are unfavorable toreflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2011 and


Table of Contents

2010, the Company's subsidiaries.maximum credit exposure related to derivative assets after considering netting arrangements with counterparties and collateral arrangements was approximately $72 million and $45 million, respectively.

Certain of the Company's derivative instruments contain provisions that adjust the level of collateral the Company is required to post based on the Company's debt rating (or based on the financial strength of the Company's life insurance subsidiaries for contracts in which those subsidiaries are the counterparty). Additionally, certain of the Company's derivative contracts contain provisions that allow the counterparty to terminate the contract if the Company's debt does not maintain a specific credit rating (generally an investment grade rating) or the Company's life insurance subsidiary does not maintain a specific financial strength rating. If these termination provisions were to be triggered, the Company's counterparty could require immediate settlement of any net liability position. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments in a net liability position containing such credit risk features was $112 million and $412 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for such instruments as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $103 million and $406 million, respectively. If the credit risk features of derivative contracts that were in a net liability position at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were triggered, the additional fair value of assets needed to settle these derivative liabilities would have been $9 million and $6 million, respectively.


16. Share-Based Compensation

The Company's share-based compensation plans consist of the Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2005 ICP"), the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan (the "2008 Plan"), the Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan, and the AmendedAmeriprise Advisor Group Deferred Equity Program for Independent Financial AdvisorsCompensation Plan ("P2Employee Advisor Deferral Plan").

In accordance with the Employee Benefits Agreement ("EBA") entered into between the Company and American Express as part of the Distribution, all American Express stock options and restricted stock awards held by the Company's employees which had not vested on or before December 31, 2005 were substituted with a stock option or restricted stock award issued under the 2005 ICP. All American Express stock options and restricted stock awards held by the Company's employees that vested on or before December 31, 2005 remained American Express stock options or restricted stock awards. Current taxes payable for 2008 and 2007 were reduced by $27 million and $15 million, respectively, for tax benefits related to the American Express awards that vested on or before December 31, 2005.

The components of the Company's share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Stock options

 $40 $37 $35 

Restricted stock awards

  57  52  46 

Restricted stock units

  51  54  32 
        
 

Total

 $148 $143 $113 
        

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Stock options

 $43 $41 $53 

Restricted stock awards

  50(1) 37  59 

Restricted stock units

  52  80  70 

Liability awards

  13  40  (4)
  

Total

 $158 $198 $178 
  
(1)
Includes $19 million of expense related to the Threadneedle equity incentive plan.

For the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006, the2009, total income tax benefit recognized by the Company related to the share-based compensation expense was $52$53 million, $50$67 million and $39$63 million, respectively.


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2008,2011, there was $151$132 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards under the Company's share-based compensation plans. That costplans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan

The 2005 ICP, which was amended and approved by shareholders on April 25, 2007,28, 2010, provides for the grant of cash and equity incentive awards to directors, employees and independent contractors, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares and similar awards designed to comply with the applicable federal regulations and laws of jurisdiction. Under the 2005 ICP, a maximum of 37.9 million shares may be issued. Of this total, no more than 4.46.0 million shares may be issued after April 25, 200728, 2010 for full value awards, which are awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. Shares issued under the 2005 ICP may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

Ameriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan

The Ameriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan ("DCP") is part of the 2005 ICP and gives certain employees the choice to defer a portion of their bonus,eligible compensation, which can be invested in investment options as provided by the DCP, including the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund. The DCP is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company provides a match if the participant deferrals are invested in the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund.on certain deferrals. Participant deferrals vest immediately and the Company match vests after three years. Distributions are made in cash for which the Company has recorded a liability, or shares of the Company's common stock for the portion of the deferral invested in the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund and the related Company match, for which the Company has recorded in equity. The DCP does allow for accelerated vesting of the share-based awards in cases of death, disability and qualified retirement. Compensation expense related to the Company match is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The participant deferrals are expensed when incurred. As


Table of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the liability balance related to the DCP was $44 million and $55 million, respectively.Contents

Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan

The 2008 Plan is designed to align new employees' interests with those of the shareholders of the Company and attract and retain new employees. The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of equity incentive awards to new employees who became employees in connection with a merger or acquisition, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and other equity basedequity-based awards designed to comply with the applicable federal and foreign regulations and laws of jurisdiction. Under the 2008 Plan, a maximum of 6.0 million shares may be issued. Awards granted under the 2008 Plan may be settled in cash and/or shares of the Company's common stock or other property according to the award's terms. As of December 31, 2008, there were no awards granted under the 2008 Plan.

Stock OptionsValuation Hierarchy

Stock options granted have an exercise price not less than 100%The Company categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used by the Company's valuation techniques. A level is assigned to each fair value measurement based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the current fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date.

Level 2


Prices or valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 3


Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses valuation techniques consistent with the market and income approaches to measure the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The Company's market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company's income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future projected cash flows to a sharesingle discounted present value amount. When applying either approach, the Company maximizes the use of common stockobservable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs.

The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.


Table of Contents

Assets

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Actively traded money market funds are measured at their net asset value ("NAV") and classified as Level 1. The Company's remaining cash equivalents are classified as Level 2 and measured at amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization.

Investments (Trading Securities and Available-for-Sale Securities)

When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 1 securities primarily include U.S. Treasuries. Level 2 securities primarily include residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, and U.S. agency and foreign government securities. The fair value of these Level 2 securities is based on a market approach with prices obtained from third party pricing services. Observable inputs used to value these securities can include, but are not limited to reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads and non-binding broker quotes. Level 3 securities primarily include certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities and corporate bonds. The fair value of corporate bonds and certain asset backed securities classified as Level 3 is typically based on a single non-binding broker quote. The fair value of certain asset backed securities and non-agency residential mortgage backed securities is obtained from third party pricing services who use significant unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value.

Prices received from third party pricing services are subjected to exception reporting that identifies investments with significant daily price movements as well as no movements. The Company reviews the exception reporting and resolves the exceptions through reaffirmation of the price or recording an appropriate fair value estimate. The Company also performs subsequent transaction testing. The Company performs annual due diligence of third party pricing services. The Company's due diligence procedures include assessing the vendor's valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies, and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions and unobservable assumptions, if any, employed in the valuation methodology. The Company also considers the results of its exception reporting controls and any resulting price challenges that arise.

Separate Account Assets

The fair value of assets held by separate accounts is determined by the NAV of the funds in which those separate accounts are invested. The NAV represents the exit price for the separate account. Separate account assets are classified as Level 2 as they are traded in principal-to-principal markets with little publicly released pricing information.

Investments Segregated for Regulatory Purposes

When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 2 securities include agency mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, and U.S. agency and foreign government securities.

Other Assets

Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as foreign currency forwards, or derivatives that are exchange-traded are classified as Level 1 measurements. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter markets are generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The counterparties' nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative assets was immaterial at December 31, 2011 and 2010. See Note 15 for further information on the grant datecredit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale consist of cash equivalents of Securities America.


Table of Contents

Liabilities

Future Policy Benefits and Claims

The Company values the embedded derivative liability attributable to the provisions of certain variable annuity riders using internal valuation models. These models calculate fair value by discounting expected cash flows from benefits plus margins for profit, risk and expenses less embedded derivative fees. The projected cash flows used by these models include observable capital market assumptions (such as, market implied equity volatility and the LIBOR swap curve) and incorporate significant unobservable inputs related to contractholder behavior assumptions (such as withdrawals and lapse rates) and margins for risk, profit and expenses that the Company believes an exit market participant would expect. The fair value of these embedded derivatives also reflects a maximum termcurrent estimate of 10 years. Stock options grantedthe Company's nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. Given the significant unobservable inputs to this valuation, these measurements are classified as Level 3. The embedded derivative liability attributable to these provisions is recorded in future policy benefits and claims. The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the provisions of its equity indexed annuity and indexed universal life products. The inputs to these calculations are primarily market observable and include interest rates, volatilities, and equity index levels. As a result, these measurements are classified as Level 2.

Customer Deposits

The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the provisions of its stock market certificates. The inputs to these calculations are primarily market observable and include interest rates, volatilities and equity index levels. As a result, these measurements are classified as Level 2.

Other Liabilities

Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as foreign currency forwards, or derivatives that are exchange-traded are classified as Level 1 measurements. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter markets are generally vest ratably over threemeasured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The Company's nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative liabilities was immaterial at December 31, 2011 and 2010. See Note 15 for further information on the credit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.

Securities sold but not yet purchased include highly liquid investments which are short-term in nature. Securities sold but not yet purchased are measured using amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization and are classified as Level 2.


Table of Contents

The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities of Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Cash equivalents

 $20 $2,287 $ $2,307 

Available-for-Sale securities:

             

Corporate debt securities

    16,685  1,355  18,040 

Residential mortgage backed securities

    7,198  198  7,396 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

    4,669  50  4,719 

Asset backed securities

    1,779  206  1,985 

State and municipal obligations

    2,130    2,130 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  22  49    71 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

    144    144 

Common stocks

  2  2  5  9 

Other debt obligations

    11    11 
  

Total Available-for-Sale securities

  24  32,667  1,814  34,505 

Trading securities

  1  30    31 

Separate account assets

    66,780    66,780 

Investments segregated for regulatory purposes

    293    293 

Other assets:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    1,958    1,958 

Equity derivative contracts

  274  1,077    1,351 

Credit derivative contracts

    1    1 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

    7    7 

Commodity derivative contracts

    2    2 
  

Total other assets

  274  3,045    3,319 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $319 $105,102 $1,814 $107,235 
  

Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims:

             

EIA embedded derivatives

 $ $2 $ $2 

IUL embedded derivatives

    3    3 

GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives

      1,585  1,585 
  

Total future policy benefits and claims

    5  1,585  1,590(1)

Customer deposits

    6    6 

Other liabilities:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    1,209    1,209 

Equity derivative contracts

  297  764    1,061 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  3  10    13 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other liabilities

  300  1,985    2,285 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $300 $1,996 $1,585 $3,881 
  
(1)
The Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $506 million cumulative decrease to four years. Vestingthe embedded derivative liability.

Table of option awards may be acceleratedContents

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Cash equivalents

 $42 $2,481 $ $2,523 

Available-for-Sale securities:

             

Corporate debt securities

    15,281  1,325  16,606 

Residential mortgage backed securities

    3,011  4,247  7,258 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

    4,817  51  4,868 

Asset backed securities

    1,544  476  2,020 

State and municipal obligations

    1,582    1,582 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  64  79    143 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

    108    108 

Common stocks

  2  3  5  10 

Other debt obligations

    24    24 
  

Total Available-for-Sale securities

  66  26,449  6,104  32,619 

Trading securities

    43    43 

Separate account assets

    68,330    68,330 

Investments segregated for regulatory purposes

    298    298 

Other assets:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    438    438 

Equity derivative contracts

  32  420    452 

Credit derivative contracts

    4    4 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  1      1 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other assets

  33  864    897 

Assets held for sale

    15    15 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $141 $98,480 $6,104 $104,725 
  

Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims:

             

EIA embedded derivatives

 $ $3 $ $3 

GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives

      421  421 
  

Total future policy benefits and claims

    3  421  424(1)

Customer deposits

    14    14 

Other liabilities:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    379    379 

Equity derivative contracts

  18  722    740 

Credit derivative contracts

    1    1 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  1      1 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other liabilities

  19  1,104    1,123 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $19 $1,121 $421 $1,561 
  
(1)
The Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $197 million cumulative decrease to the embedded derivative liability.

Table of Contents

The following tables provide a summary of changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities of Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 Available-for-Sale Securities Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims: GMWB
and GMAB
Embedded
Derivatives

 
 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Residential
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Commercial
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Asset
Backed
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Total
 
 
   
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2011

 $1,325 $4,247 $51 $476 $5 $6,104 $(421)

Total gains (losses) included in:

                      

Net income

  7  48    8    63(1) (1,007)(2)

Other comprehensive income

  11  (110)   (18)   (117)  

Purchases

  189  556  104  118    967   

Sales

  (51) (2)       (53)  

Issues

              (149)

Settlements

  (122) (885) (4) (87)   (1,098) (8)

Transfers into Level 3

  7    1  14    22   

Transfers out of Level 3

  (11) (3,656) (102) (305)   (4,074)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2011

 $1,355 $198 $50 $206 $5 $1,814 $(1,585)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2011 included in:

                      

Net investment income

 $ $(32)$ $1 $ $(31)$ 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

              (1,035)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 
 Available-for-Sale Securities Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims: GMWB
and GMAB
Embedded
Derivatives

 
 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Residential
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities
 Asset
Backed
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Other
Structured
Investments

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 $1,252 $3,982 $72 $455 $4 $58 $5,823 $(299)

Total gains included in:

                         

Net income

  1  55  1  12      69(1) 4(2)

Other comprehensive income

  30  292  10  38  1    371   

Purchases, sales, issues and settlements, net

  17  (61) 112  (5)   (58)(3) 5  (126)

Transfers into Level 3

  25            25   

Transfers out of Level 3

    (21) (144) (24)     (189)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $1,325 $4,247 $51 $476 $5 $ $6,104 $(421)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2010 included in:

                         

Net investment income

 $ $54 $ $11 $ $ $65 $ 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

                (15)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)
Represents the elimination of Ameriprise Financial's investment in CDOs, which were consolidated due to the adoption of a new accounting standard. See Note 2 and Note 4 for additional information related to the consolidation of CDOs.

The impact to pretax income of the Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk on the fair value of its GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives was an increase of $168 million and $28 million, net of DAC and DSIC amortization, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2011 transfers out of Level 3 to Level 2 included certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and sub-prime non-agency residential mortgage backed securities classified as asset backed securities with a fair value of approximately $3.9 billion. The transfers reflect improved pricing transparency of these


Table of Contents

securities, a continuing trend of increased activity in the non-agency residential mortgage backed security market and increased observability of significant inputs to the valuation methodology. All other securities transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 represent securities with fair values that are now obtained from a third party pricing service with observable inputs. Securities transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 represent securities with fair values that are now based on age and lengtha single non-binding broker quote.

The Company recognizes transfers between levels of service. Stock options granted are expensedthe fair value hierarchy as of the beginning of the quarter in which each transfer occurred.

During the reporting periods, there were no material assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a straight-line basis overnonrecurring basis.

The following table provides the option vesting period based oncarrying value and the estimated fair value of financial instruments that are not reported at fair value. All other financial instruments that are reported at fair value have been included above in the awardstable with balances of assets and liabilities Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 
 
   
 
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Financial Assets

             

Commercial mortgage loans, net

 $2,589 $2,772 $2,577 $2,671 

Policy loans

  742  715  733  808 

Receivables

  2,444  2,148  1,852  1,566 

Restricted and segregated cash

  1,500  1,500  1,516  1,516 

Assets held for sale

      18  18 

Other investments and assets

  390  388  331  338 

Financial Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims

 $15,064 $16,116 $15,328 $15,768 

Investment certificate reserves

  2,766  2,752  3,127  3,129 

Banking and brokerage customer deposits

  7,078  7,091  5,638  5,642 

Separate account liabilities

  3,950  3,950  4,930  4,930 

Debt and other liabilities

  3,180  3,412  2,722  2,919 
  

Investments

The fair value of commercial mortgage loans, except those with significant credit deterioration, is determined by discounting contractual cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for loans with similar remaining maturities and characteristics including loan-to-value ratio, occupancy rate, refinance risk, debt-service coverage, location, and property condition. For commercial mortgage loans with significant credit deterioration, fair value is determined using the same adjustments as above with an additional adjustment for the Company's estimate of the amount recoverable on the dateloan.

The fair value of grantpolicy loans is determined using discounted cash flows.

Receivables

The fair value of consumer bank loans is determined by discounting estimated cash flows and incorporating adjustments for prepayment, administration expenses, severity and credit loss estimates, with discount rates based on the Company's estimate of current market conditions.

Loans held for sale are measured at the lower of cost or market and fair value is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics.

Brokerage margin loans are measured at outstanding balances, which are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the sufficiency of the collateral and short term nature of these loans.

Restricted and Segregated Cash

Restricted and segregated cash is generally set aside for specific business transactions and restrictions are specific to the Company and do not transfer to third party market participants; therefore, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Amounts segregated under federal and other regulations may also reflect resale agreements and are measured at the cost at which the securities will be sold. This measurement is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between entering into the transaction and its expected realization and the reduced risk of credit loss due to pledging U.S. government-backed securities as collateral.


Table of Contents

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale reflect notes receivable of Securities America. See Note 1 and Note 24 for additional information on the Company's presentation of discontinued operations.

Other Investments and Assets

Other investments and assets primarily consist of syndicated loans. The fair value of syndicated loans is obtained from a third party pricing service.

Future Policy Benefits and Claims

The fair value of fixed annuities, in deferral status, is determined by discounting cash flows using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The following weighted average assumptions were usedrisk neutral discount rate with adjustments for stock option grants:

 
 2008 2007 2006 

Dividend yield

  1.0% 1.0% 1.0%

Expected volatility

  27% 20% 27%

Risk-free interest rate

  3.0% 4.7% 4.5%

Expected life of stock option (years)

  5.3  4.5  4.5 

The dividend yield assumption assumes the Company's average dividend payout would continue with no changes. The expected volatilityprofit margin, expense margin, early policy surrender behavior, a provision for grants in 2008 and 2007 was based on historical volatilities experienced by a peer group of companies, the Company's implied volatilityadverse deviation from estimated early policy surrender behavior, and the Company's historical stock volatility since Distribution.nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. The expected volatilityfair value of other liabilities including non-life contingent fixed annuities in payout status, equity indexed annuity host contracts and the fixed portion of a small number of variable annuity contracts classified as investment contracts is determined in a similar manner.

Customer Deposits

The fair value of investment certificate reserves is determined by discounting cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for grants in 2006 wasassets with similar terms and characteristics, with adjustments for early withdrawal behavior, penalty fees, expense margin and the Company's nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities.

Banking and brokerage customer deposits are liabilities with no defined maturities and fair value is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.

Separate Account Liabilities

Certain separate account liabilities are classified as investment contracts and are carried at an amount equal to the related separate account assets. Carrying value is a reasonable estimate of the fair value as it represents the exit value as evidenced by withdrawal transactions between contractholders and the Company. A nonperformance adjustment is not included as the related separate account assets act as collateral for these liabilities and minimize nonperformance risk.

Debt and Other Liabilities

The fair value of long-term debt is based on historicalquoted prices in active markets, when available. If quoted prices are not available fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques such as present value of cash flows.

The fair value of short-term borrowings is obtained from a third party service. A nonperformance adjustment is not included as collateral requirements for these borrowings minimize the nonperformance risk.

The fair value of future funding commitments to affordable housing partnerships is determined by discounting cash flows.


Table of Contents


15. Derivatives and implied volatilities experienced by a peer groupHedging Activities

Derivative instruments enable the Company to manage its exposure to various market risks. The value of companiessuch instruments is derived from an underlying variable or multiple variables, including equity, foreign exchange and interest rate indices or prices. The Company primarily enters into derivative agreements for risk management purposes related to the Company's products and operations.

The Company uses derivatives as economic hedges and accounting hedges. The following table presents the balance sheet location and the limited trading experiencegross fair value of derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives:

 
  
 Asset  
 Liability 
 
  
 December 31,  
 December 31, 
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments

 Balance Sheet
Location

 Balance Sheet
Location

 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
  
 (in millions)
 

Cash flow hedges

                 

Asset-based distribution fees

 Other assets $ $10 

Other liabilities

 $ $ 

Interest on debt

 Other assets     

Other liabilities

  11   

Fair value hedges

                 

Fixed rate debt

 Other assets  157  61 

Other liabilities

     
  

Total qualifying hedges

    157  71    11   
  

Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

GMWB and GMAB

                 

Interest rate contracts

 Other assets  1,801  366 

Other liabilities

  1,198  379 

Equity contracts

 Other assets  1,314  354 

Other liabilities

  1,031  665 

Credit contracts

 Other assets  1  4 

Other liabilities

    1 

Foreign currency contracts

 Other assets  7   

Other liabilities

  10   

Embedded derivatives(1)

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  1,585  421 
  

Total GMWB and GMAB

    3,123  724    3,824  1,466 
  

Other derivatives:

                 

Interest rate

                 

Interest rate lock commitments

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

     

Equity

                 

EIA

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

     

EIA embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  2  3 

IUL

 Other assets  1   

Other liabilities

     

IUL embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  3   

Stock market certificates

 Other assets  34  89 

Other liabilities

  29  75 

Stock market certificates embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Customer deposits

  6  14 

Ameriprise Financial

                 

Franchise Advisor Deferred

                 

Compensation Plan

 Other assets  2  8 

Other liabilities

     

Seed money

 Other assets     

Other liabilities

  1   

Foreign exchange

                 

Foreign currency

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

  3  1 

Commodity

                 

Seed money

 Other assets  2   

Other liabilities

     
  

Total other

    39  100    44  93 
  

Total non-designated hedges

    3,162  824    3,868  1,559 
  

Total derivatives

   $3,319 $895   $3,879 $1,559 
  

N/A Not applicable.

(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.

See Note 14 for additional information regarding the Company's shares in that year. The risk free interest rate for periods within the expected option life isfair value measurement of derivative instruments.


Table of Contents


based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the grant date. The expected life of the option is based on experience while the Company was a part of American Express and subsequent experience after the Distribution.Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges

The weighted average grant date fair value for options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $14.00, $13.69 and $12.08, respectively.

Afollowing table presents a summary of the Company's stock option activityimpact of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2008 is presented below (shares and intrinsic value in millions):

 
 Shares Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Years)
 Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at January 1

  13.2 $38.62  7.5 $217 

Granted

  2.6  51.20     

Exercised

  (0.3) 33.46     

Forfeited

  (0.4) 38.04     
             

Outstanding at December 31

  15.1 $40.79  7.0 $2 
             

Exercisable at December 31

  8.5 $35.66  6.2 $2 

The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $5 million, $43 million and $16 million during the years ended December 31, 2008, 200731:

 
  
 Amount of Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives Recognized in Income
 
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments

 Location of Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives Recognized in Income

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
 

GMWB and GMAB

            

Interest rate contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses $709 $95 $(435)

Equity contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  326  (370) (1,245)

Credit contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (12) (44) (65)

Foreign currency contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (2)    

Embedded derivatives(1)

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (1,165) (121) 1,533 
  

Total GMWB and GMAB

    (144) (440) (212)
  

Other derivatives:

            

Interest rate

            

Interest rate lock commitments

 Other revenues  (1)    

Equity

            

GMDB

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses    (4) (10)

EIA

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  (1) 2  4 

EIA embedded derivatives

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  1  7  7 

IUL

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  1     

IUL embedded derivatives

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  (3)    

Stock market certificates

 Banking and deposit interest expense  1  9  15 

Stock market certificates embedded derivatives

 Banking and deposit interest expense    (10) (18)

Seed money

 Net investment income  4  (5) (14)

Ameriprise Financial

            

Franchise Advisor Deferred

            

Compensation Plan

 Distribution expenses  (4) 9   

Foreign exchange

            

Seed money

 General and administrative expense  (1) 1   

Foreign currency

 Net investment income  (3) (1)  

Commodity

            

Seed money

 Net investment income  1     
  

Total other

    (5) 8  (16)
  

Total derivatives

   $(149)$(432)$(228)
  
(1)
The fair values of GMWB and 2006, respectively.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards generally vest ratably over three to four years or at the end of five years. Vesting of restricted stock awards may be acceleratedGMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on agechanges in equity, interest rate and length of service. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards is based on the market price of Ameriprise Financial stock on the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Quarterly dividends are paid on restricted stock, as declared by the Company's Board of Directors, during the vesting period andcredit markets.

The Company holds derivative instruments that either do not qualify or are not subjectdesignated for hedge accounting treatment. These derivative instruments are used as economic hedges of equity, interest rate, credit and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to forfeiture.

Certain advisors receive a portion of their compensation in the form of restricted stock awards which are subject to forfeiture based on future service requirements. The Company provides a match of these restricted stock awards equal to one halfvarious products and transactions of the restricted stock awards earned for 2006 and one quarter for 2007 and 2008.Company.

A summaryThe majority of the Company's restricted stock award activity for 2008 is presented below (sharesannuity contracts contain GMDB provisions, which may result in millions):

 
 Shares Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 

Non-vested shares at January 1

  3.3 $44.49 

Granted

  1.1  49.83 

Vested

  (1.2) 41.16 

Forfeited

  (0.3) 47.20 
       

Non-vested shares at December 31

  2.9 $48.19 
       

The faira death benefit payable that exceeds the contract accumulation value when market values of customers' accounts decline. Certain annuity contracts contain GMWB or GMAB provisions, which guarantee the right to make limited partial withdrawals each contract year regardless of the volatility inherent in the underlying investments or guarantee a minimum accumulation value of restricted stock vested duringconsideration received at the years endedbeginning of the contract period, after a specified holding period, respectively. The Company economically hedges the exposure related to non-life contingent GMWB and GMAB provisions primarily using various futures, options, interest rate swaptions, interest rate swaps, variance swaps and credit default swaps. At December 31, 20082011 and 2007 was $59 million and $75 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

The 2005 ICP provides2010, the gross notional amount of derivative contracts for the grantCompany's GMWB and GMAB provisions was $104.7 billion and $55.5 billion, respectively. The Company had previously entered into a limited number of deferred share unitsderivative contracts to non-employee directorseconomically hedge equity exposure related to GMDB provisions on variable annuity contracts written in 2009. As of both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company and restricted stock units to employees. The director awards are fully vested upon issuance. The deferred share units are settled for Ameriprise Financial common stock upon the director's termination of service. The employee awards generally vest ratably over three to four years. Compensation expense for deferred share units and restricted stock units is baseddid not have any outstanding hedges on the market price of Ameriprise Financial stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units granted to employees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or accelerated basis due to retirement eligibility. Deferred share units granted to non-employee directors are expensed immediately. Restricted stock units include units awarded under the DCP.its GMDB provisions.


Table of Contents

The deferred premium associated with some of the above options is paid or received semi-annually over the life of the option contract. The following is a summary of the payments the Company is scheduled to make and receive for these options:

 
 Premiums Payable
 Premiums Receivable
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

2012

 $372 $41 

2013

  349  26 

2014

  324  24 

2015

  296  22 

2016

  265  15 

2017-2026

  925  34 
  

Actual timing and payment amounts may differ due to future contract settlements, modifications or exercises of options prior to the full premium being paid or received.

EIA, IUL and stock market certificate products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. As a result of fluctuations in equity markets, the obligation incurred by the Company related to EIA, IUL and stock market certificate products will positively or negatively impact earnings over the life of these products. As a means of economically hedging its obligations under the provisions of these products, the Company enters into index options and futures contracts. The gross notional amount of these derivative contracts was $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company enters into forward contracts, futures, total return swaps and commodity swaps to manage its exposure to price risk arising from seed money investments in proprietary investment products. The gross notional amount of these contracts was $123 million and $174 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to economically hedge its exposure to certain receivables and obligations denominated in non-functional currencies. The gross notional amount of these contracts was $26 million and $21 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In 2010, the Company entered into a total return swap to economically hedge its exposure to equity price risk of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common stock granted as part of its Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan ("Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan"). In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company extended the contract through 2012. As part of the contract, the Company expects to cash settle the difference between the value of a fixed number of shares at the contract date (which may be increased from time to time) and the value of those shares over an unwind period ending on December 31, 2012. The gross notional value of this contract was $17 million and $35 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Embedded Derivatives

Certain annuities contain GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions, which are considered embedded derivatives. In addition, the equity component of the EIA, IUL and stock market certificate product obligations are also considered embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are bifurcated from their host contracts and reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. As discussed above, the Company uses derivatives to mitigate the financial statement impact of these embedded derivatives.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company has designated and accounts for the following as cash flow hedges: (i) interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate exposure on debt, (ii) interest rate lock agreements to hedge interest rate exposure on debt issuances and (iii) swaptions used to hedge the risk of increasing interest rates on forecasted fixed premium product sales. The Company previously designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges interest rate swaps to hedge certain asset-based distribution fees.

During the second quarter of 2011, the Company reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings a $27 million gain on an interest rate hedge put in place in anticipation of issuing debt between December 2010 and September 2011. The gain was reclassified due to the forecasted transaction not occurring according to the original hedge strategy. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, amounts recognized in earnings related to cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness were not material. The estimated net amount of existing pretax losses on December 31, 2011 that the Company expects to reclassify to earnings within the next twelve months is $2 million, which consists of $4 million of pretax gains to be recorded as a reduction to interest and debt expense and $6 million of pretax losses to be recorded in net investment income. The following tables present the impact of the effective portion of the


Table of Contents

Company's cash flow hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31:

 
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Interest on debt

 $(11)$16 $19 

Asset-based distribution fees

  1  20   
  

Total

 $(10)$36 $19 
  


 
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income into Income
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income into Income

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Other revenues

 $27 $ $ 

Interest and debt expense

  4  8  8 

Distribution fees

  9  11   

Net investment income

  (6) (6) (6)
  

Total

 $34 $13 $2 
  

The following is a summary of unrealized derivatives gains (losses) included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to cash flow hedges:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at January 1

 $18 $3 $(8)

Holding gains (losses)

  (10) 36  19 

Reclassification of realized gains

  (34) (13) (2)

Income tax benefit (provision)

  15  (8) (6)
  

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at December 31

 $(11)$18 $3 
  

Currently, the longest period of time over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 24 years and relates to forecasted debt interest payments.

Fair Value Hedges

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company entered into and designated as fair value hedges three interest rate swaps to convert senior notes due 2015, 2019 and 2020 from fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. The swaps have identical terms as the underlying debt being hedged so no ineffectiveness is expected to be realized. The Company recognizes gains and losses on the derivatives and the related hedged items within interest and debt expense. The following table presents the amounts recognized in income related to fair value hedges for the years ended December 31:

 
  
 Amount of Gain Recognized
in Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 Location of Gain Recorded into Income
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
 

Fixed rate debt

 Interest and debt expense $41 $36 

Credit Risk

Credit risk associated with the Company's derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. To mitigate such risk, the Company has established guidelines and oversight of credit risk through a comprehensive enterprise risk management program that includes members of senior management. Key components of this program are to require preapproval of counterparties and the use of master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements whenever practical. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company held $802 million and $98 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents and recorded a corresponding liability in other liabilities for collateral the Company is obligated to return to counterparties. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had accepted additional collateral consisting of various securities with a fair value of $186 million and $23 million, respectively, which are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2011 and


Table of Contents

2010, the Company's maximum credit exposure related to derivative assets after considering netting arrangements with counterparties and collateral arrangements was approximately $72 million and $45 million, respectively.

Certain of the Company's derivative instruments contain provisions that adjust the level of collateral the Company is required to post based on the Company's debt rating (or based on the financial strength of the Company's life insurance subsidiaries for contracts in which those subsidiaries are the counterparty). Additionally, certain of the Company's derivative contracts contain provisions that allow the counterparty to terminate the contract if the Company's debt does not maintain a specific credit rating (generally an investment grade rating) or the Company's life insurance subsidiary does not maintain a specific financial strength rating. If these termination provisions were to be triggered, the Company's counterparty could require immediate settlement of any net liability position. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments in a net liability position containing such credit risk features was $112 million and $412 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for such instruments as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $103 million and $406 million, respectively. If the credit risk features of derivative contracts that were in a net liability position at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were triggered, the additional fair value of assets needed to settle these derivative liabilities would have been $9 million and $6 million, respectively.


16. Share-Based Compensation

The Company's share-based compensation plans consist of the Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2005 ICP"), the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan (the "2008 Plan"), the Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan, and the Ameriprise Advisor Group Deferred Compensation Plan ("Employee Advisor Deferral Plan").

The components of the Company's share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Stock options

 $43 $41 $53 

Restricted stock awards

  50(1) 37  59 

Restricted stock units

  52  80  70 

Liability awards

  13  40  (4)
  

Total

 $158 $198 $178 
  
(1)
Includes $19 million of expense related to the Threadneedle equity incentive plan.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, total income tax benefit recognized by the Company related to share-based compensation expense was $53 million, $67 million and $63 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 0.7was $132 million units outstanding of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards under the Company's share-based compensation plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan

The 2005 ICP, which was amended and approved by shareholders on April 28, 2010, provides for the grant of cash and equity incentive awards to directors, employees and independent contractors, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, including deferred share units,stock appreciation rights, performance shares and similar awards designed to comply with the applicable federal regulations and laws of jurisdiction. Under the 2005 ICP, a maximum of 37.9 million shares may be issued. Of this total, no more than 6.0 million shares may be issued after April 28, 2010 for full value awards, which approximately 0.5 million were fully vested.are awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. Shares issued under the 2005 ICP may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

Ameriprise Financial Deferred Equity Program for Independent Financial AdvisorsCompensation Plan

The P2 DeferralAmeriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan which was amended in April 2008,("DCP") gives certain advisorsemployees the choice to defer a portion of their commissionseligible compensation, which can be invested in investment options as provided by the formDCP, including the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund. The DCP is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan under section 409A of share-based awards, which are subject to forfeiture based on future service requirements.the Internal Revenue Code. The Company provides a match on the advisorcertain deferrals. Participant deferrals which participants can elect to receive in cash or shares of common stock. The P2 Deferral Plan allows for the grant of share-based awards of up to 8.5 million shares of common stock.

The number of units awarded is based on the performance measures, deferral percentagevest immediately and the market value of Ameriprise Financial common stock on the deferral date as defined by the plan. As independent financial advisorsCompany match vests after three years. Distributions are not employees of the Company, the awards are expensed based on the stock pricemade in shares of the Company's common stock up tofor the vesting date. The share-based awards generally vest ratably over four years, beginning on January 1portion of the year followingdeferral invested in the plan year inAmeriprise Financial Stock Fund and the related Company match, for which the award was made.Company has recorded in equity. The P2 Deferral Plan allowsDCP does allow for accelerated vesting of the share-based awards based on agein cases of death, disability and years as an advisor. Commissionqualified retirement. Compensation expense related to the Company match is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, share-based expense related to restricted stock units was $44 million, $52 million, and $31 million, respectively, for share-based awards under the P2 Deferral Plan.

As of December 31, 2008, there were approximately 3.7 million units outstanding under the P2 Deferral Plan, of which approximately 2.3 million were fully vested.

17. Regulatory Requirements

Restrictions on the transfer of funds exist under regulatory requirements applicable to certain of the Company's subsidiaries. At December 31, 2008, the aggregate amount of unrestricted net assets was approximately $1.3 billion.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") defines Risk-Based Capital ("RBC") requirements for insurance companies. The RBC requirements are used by the NAIC and state insurance regulators to identify companies that merit regulatory actions designed to protect policyholders. These requirements apply to both the Company's life and property casualty insurance companies. In addition, IDS Property Casualty is subject to the statutory surplus requirements of the State of Wisconsin. The Company's life and property casualty companies each met their respective minimum RBC requirements.

State insurance statutes also contain limitations as to the amount of dividends and distributions that insurers may make without providing prior notification to state regulators. For RiverSource Life, dividends in excess of statutory unassigned funds require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, RiverSource Life's primary regulator, and are subject to potential disapproval. In addition, dividends whose fair market value, together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12 months, exceeds the greater of (1) the previous year's statutory net gain from operations or (2) 10% of the previous year-end statutory capital and surplus are referred to as "extraordinary dividends." Extraordinary dividends also require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, and are subject to potential disapproval.

Ameriprise Certificate Company ("ACC") is registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). ACC markets and sells investment certificates to clients. ACC is subject to various capital requirements under the 1940 Act, laws of the State of Minnesota and understandings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the Minnesota Department of Commerce. The terms of the investment certificates issued by ACC and the provisions of the 1940 Act also require the maintenance by ACC of qualified assets. Under the provisions of its certificates and the 1940 Act, ACC was required to have qualified assets (as that term is defined in Section 28(b) of the 1940 Act) in the amount of $4.9 billion and $3.7 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ACC had qualified assets of $5.1 billion and $4.0 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ACC's capital ratio, as of December 31, 2008, had dropped to 4.61% and 4.97% per the Minnesota Department of Commerce and SEC capital requirements, respectively. Ameriprise Financial promptly provided additional capital to ACC in January 2009 to bring capital back above the 5% requirement per the Minnesota Department of Commerce and SEC capital requirements. Ameriprise Financial and ACC entered into a Capital Support Agreement on March 2, 2009, pursuant to which Ameriprise Financial agrees to commit such capital to ACC as is necessary to satisfy applicable minimum capital requirements, up to a maximum commitment of $115 million.

Threadneedle's required capital is based on the requirements specified by the United Kingdom's regulator, the Financial Services Authority, under its Capital Adequacy Requirements for asset managers.

The Company has eight broker-dealer subsidiaries, American Enterprise Investment Services, Inc. ("AEIS"), Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. ("AFSI"), Securities America, Inc. ("SAI"), RiverSource Distributors, Inc. ("RSD"), RiverSource Fund


Table of Contents


Distributors, Inc. ("RSFD"), RiverSource Services, Inc. ("RSSI"), Ameriprise Advisor Services, Inc. ("AASI")Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan

The 2008 Plan is designed to align new employees' interests with those of the shareholders of the Company and Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc.attract and retain new employees. The broker-dealers are subject2008 Plan provides for the grant of equity incentive awards to new employees who became employees in connection with a merger or acquisition, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and other equity-based awards designed to comply with the applicable federal and foreign regulations and laws of jurisdiction. Under the 2008 Plan, a maximum of 6.0 million shares may be issued. Awards granted under the 2008 Plan may be settled in cash and/or shares of the Company's common stock according to the net capital requirements of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") and the Uniform Net Capital requirements of the SEC under Rule 15c3-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. AASI is also subject to regulatory reporting requirements established by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.award's terms.

Ameriprise Trust Company is subject to capital adequacy requirements under the laws of the State of Minnesota as enforced by the Minnesota Department of Commerce.

The initial capital of Ameriprise Bank, per Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation policy, should be sufficient to provide a Tier 1 capital to assets leverage ratio of not less than 8% throughout its first three years of operation. For purposes of completing the bank's regulatory reporting, the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") requires Ameriprise Bank to maintain a Tier 1 (core) capital requirement based upon 4% of total assets adjusted per the OTS, and total risk-based capital based upon 8% of total risk-weighted assets. The OTS also requires Ameriprise Bank to maintain minimum ratios of Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets, as well as Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets and tangible capital to adjusted total assets. Under OTS regulations, Ameriprise Bank is required to have a leverage ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets of at least 4%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4%, a total risk-based ratio of at least 8% and a tangible capital ratio of at least 1.5%. As of December 31, 2008, Ameriprise Bank's Tier 1 core capital dropped to 7.36%. Ameriprise Financial promptly provided additional capital to Ameriprise Bank in January 2009 to bring the Tier 1 core capital back above the 8% FDIC requirement.

Government debt securities of $6 million and $7 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, held by the Company's life insurance subsidiaries were on deposit with various states as required by law and satisfied legal requirements.

18. Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; that is, an exit price. The exit price assumes the asset or liability is not exchanged subject to a forced liquidation or distressed sale.

Valuation Hierarchy

Under SFAS 157, theThe Company categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used by the Company's valuation techniques. A level is assigned to each fair value measurement based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date.

Level 2

 

Prices or valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 3

 

Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses valuation techniques consistent with the market and income approaches to measure the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The Company's market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company's income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future projected cash flows to a single discounted present value amount. When applying either approach, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs.

The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.


Table of Contents

Assets

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Actively traded money market funds are measured at their net asset value ("NAV") and classified as Level 1. The Company's remaining cash equivalents are classified as Level 2 and measured at amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization.

Investments (Trading Securities and Available-for-Sale Securities)

When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from nationally-recognizedthird party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of cash flows.techniques. Level 1 securities primarily include U.S. Treasuries and seed money in funds traded in active markets.Treasuries. Level 2 securities primarily include agencyresidential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, and U.S. agency and foreign government securities. The fair value of these Level 2 securities is based on a market approach with prices obtained from third party pricing services. Observable inputs used to value these securities can include, but are not limited to reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads and agency securities, and seed money and other investments in certain hedge funds.non-binding broker quotes. Level 3 securities primarily include certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities and corporate bonds.

Through the Company's own experience transacting in the marketplace The fair value of corporate bonds and through discussions with its pricing vendors, the Company believes that the market forcertain asset backed securities classified as Level 3 is typically based on a single non-binding broker quote. The fair value of certain asset backed securities and non-agency residential mortgage backed securities is inactive. Indicatorsobtained from third party pricing services who use significant unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value.

Prices received from third party pricing services are subjected to exception reporting that identifies investments with significant daily price movements as well as no movements. The Company reviews the exception reporting and resolves the exceptions through reaffirmation of inactive markets include:the price or recording an appropriate fair value estimate. The Company also performs subsequent transaction testing. The Company performs annual due diligence of third party pricing services' reliance on brokers or discounted cash flow analyses to provide prices, an increaseservices. The Company's due diligence procedures include assessing the vendor's valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies, and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions and unobservable assumptions, if any, employed in the disparity between prices provided by different pricing services for the same security, unreasonably large bid-offer spreads and a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. In certain cases, this market inactivity has resulted in the Company applying valuation techniques that rely more on an income approach (discounted cash flows using market rates) than on a market approach (prices from pricing services).methodology. The Company also considers market observable yields for other asset classes it considers to bethe results of similar risk which includes nonperformanceits exception reporting controls and liquidity for individual securities to set the discount rate for applying the income approach to certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities.

At the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2008, $539 million of prime non-agency residential mortgage backed securities were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because management believes the market for these prime quality assets is now inactive. The loss recognized on these assets during the fourth quarter of 2008 was $72 million, of which $16 million was included in net investment income and $56 million was included in other comprehensive loss.any resulting price challenges that arise.

Separate Account Assets

The fair value of assets held by separate accounts is determined by the NAV of the funds in which those separate accounts are invested. The NAV represents the exit price for the separate account. Separate account assets are classified as Level 2 as they are traded in principal-to-principal markets with little publicly released pricing information.

DerivativesInvestments Segregated for Regulatory Purposes

When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from third party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 2 securities include agency mortgage backed securities, asset backed securities, municipal and corporate bonds, and U.S. agency and foreign government securities.

Other Assets

Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as foreign exchangecurrency forwards, or derivatives that are exchanged-tradedexchange-traded are classified as Level 1 measurements. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter markets are generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include interest rate swaps and the majority of options. Derivatives that are valued using pricing models that have significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3 measurements. Structured derivatives that are used byThe counterparties' nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative assets was immaterial at December 31, 2011 and 2010. See Note 15 for further information on the Company to hedge its exposure to marketcredit risk of derivative instruments and related to certain variable annuity riders are classified as Level 3.collateral.

Consolidated Property FundsAssets Held for Sale

The Company records the fair valueAssets held for sale consist of the properties held by its consolidated property funds within other assets. The fair valuecash equivalents of these assets is determined using discounted cash flows and market comparables. Given the significance of the unobservable inputs to these measurements, the assets are classified as Level 3.Securities America.


Table of Contents

Liabilities

Embedded Derivatives


Variable Annuity Riders—Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation BenefitFuture Policy Benefits and Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit

Claims

The Company values the embedded derivative liability attributable to the provisions of certain variable annuity riders using internal valuation models. These models calculate fair value by discounting expected cash flows from benefits plus margins for profit, risk and expenses less embedded derivative fees. The projected cash flows used by these models include observable capital market assumptions (such as, market implied equity volatility and the LIBOR swap curve) and incorporate significant unobservable inputs related to contractholder behavior assumptions (such as withdrawals and lapse rates) and margins for risk, profit and expenses that the Company believes an exit market participant would expect. The fair value of these embedded derivatives also reflects a current estimate of the Company's nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. Given the significant unobservable inputs to this valuation, these measurements are classified as Level 3. The embedded derivative liability attributable to these provisions is recorded in future policy benefits and claims.


Equity Indexed Annuities and Stock Market Certificates

The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the provisions of its equity indexed annuitiesannuity and indexed universal life products. The inputs to these calculations are primarily market observable and include interest rates, volatilities, and equity index levels. As a result, these measurements are classified as Level 2.

Customer Deposits

The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the provisions of its stock market certificates. The inputs to these calculations are primarily market observable.observable and include interest rates, volatilities and equity index levels. As a result, these measurements are classified as Level 2.

Other Liabilities

Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as foreign currency forwards, or derivatives that are exchange-traded are classified as Level 1 measurements. The embeddedfair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter markets are generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The Company's nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative liability attributable toliabilities was immaterial at December 31, 2011 and 2010. See Note 15 for further information on the provisionscredit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.

Securities sold but not yet purchased include highly liquid investments which are short-term in nature. Securities sold but not yet purchased are measured using amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the Company's equity indexed annuitiesshort time between the purchase of the instrument and stock market certificates is recorded in future policy benefitsits expected realization and claims and customer deposits, respectively.are classified as Level 2.

The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 December 31, 2008 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             
 

Cash equivalents

 $504 $5,446 $ $5,950 
 

Available-for-Sale securities

  32  20,228  2,613  22,873 
 

Trading securities

  224  244  30  498 
 

Separate account assets

    44,746    44,746 
 

Other assets

  1  2,308  487  2,796 
          

Total assets at fair value

 $761 $72,972 $3,130 $76,863 
          

Liabilities

             
 

Future policy benefits and claims

 $ $16 $1,832 $1,848 
 

Customer deposits

    5    5 
 

Other liabilities

  7  673    680 
          

Total liabilities at fair value

 $7 $694 $1,832 $2,533 
          

Table of Contents

The following table providestables present the balances of assets and liabilities of Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Cash equivalents

 $20 $2,287 $ $2,307 

Available-for-Sale securities:

             

Corporate debt securities

    16,685  1,355  18,040 

Residential mortgage backed securities

    7,198  198  7,396 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

    4,669  50  4,719 

Asset backed securities

    1,779  206  1,985 

State and municipal obligations

    2,130    2,130 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  22  49    71 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

    144    144 

Common stocks

  2  2  5  9 

Other debt obligations

    11    11 
  

Total Available-for-Sale securities

  24  32,667  1,814  34,505 

Trading securities

  1  30    31 

Separate account assets

    66,780    66,780 

Investments segregated for regulatory purposes

    293    293 

Other assets:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    1,958    1,958 

Equity derivative contracts

  274  1,077    1,351 

Credit derivative contracts

    1    1 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

    7    7 

Commodity derivative contracts

    2    2 
  

Total other assets

  274  3,045    3,319 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $319 $105,102 $1,814 $107,235 
  

Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims:

             

EIA embedded derivatives

 $ $2 $ $2 

IUL embedded derivatives

    3    3 

GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives

      1,585  1,585 
  

Total future policy benefits and claims

    5  1,585  1,590(1)

Customer deposits

    6    6 

Other liabilities:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    1,209    1,209 

Equity derivative contracts

  297  764    1,061 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  3  10    13 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other liabilities

  300  1,985    2,285 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $300 $1,996 $1,585 $3,881 
  
(1)
The Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $506 million cumulative decrease to the embedded derivative liability.

Table of Contents

 
 December 31, 2010 
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Cash equivalents

 $42 $2,481 $ $2,523 

Available-for-Sale securities:

             

Corporate debt securities

    15,281  1,325  16,606 

Residential mortgage backed securities

    3,011  4,247  7,258 

Commercial mortgage backed securities

    4,817  51  4,868 

Asset backed securities

    1,544  476  2,020 

State and municipal obligations

    1,582    1,582 

U.S. government and agencies obligations

  64  79    143 

Foreign government bonds and obligations

    108    108 

Common stocks

  2  3  5  10 

Other debt obligations

    24    24 
  

Total Available-for-Sale securities

  66  26,449  6,104  32,619 

Trading securities

    43    43 

Separate account assets

    68,330    68,330 

Investments segregated for regulatory purposes

    298    298 

Other assets:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    438    438 

Equity derivative contracts

  32  420    452 

Credit derivative contracts

    4    4 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  1      1 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other assets

  33  864    897 

Assets held for sale

    15    15 
  

Total assets at fair value

 $141 $98,480 $6,104 $104,725 
  

Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims:

             

EIA embedded derivatives

 $ $3 $ $3 

GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives

      421  421 
  

Total future policy benefits and claims

    3  421  424(1)

Customer deposits

    14    14 

Other liabilities:

             

Interest rate derivative contracts

    379    379 

Equity derivative contracts

  18  722    740 

Credit derivative contracts

    1    1 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  1      1 

Other

    2    2 
  

Total other liabilities

  19  1,104    1,123 
  

Total liabilities at fair value

 $19 $1,121 $421 $1,561 
  
(1)
The Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $197 million cumulative decrease to the embedded derivative liability.

Table of Contents

The following tables provide a summary of changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities of Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis for 2008:basis:

 
 Available-
for-Sale
Securities
 Trading
Securities
 Other Assets Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims
 Other
Liabilities
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1

 $2,908 $44 $629 $(158)$ 
 

Total gains (losses) included in:

                
  

Net loss

  (466(1) (2(1) 76  (2) (1,611(3) (9(3)
  

Other comprehensive loss

  (428) (11) (106)    
 

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

  60  (1) (112) (63) 9 
 

Transfers into Level 3

  539  (4)        
            

Balance, December 31

 $2,613 $30 $487 $(1,832)$ 
            

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net loss relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31

 
$

(471

(1)

$

(2

(1)

$

57

  (5)

$

(1,608

(3)

$


  (3)

 
 Available-for-Sale Securities Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims: GMWB
and GMAB
Embedded
Derivatives

 
 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Residential
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Commercial
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Asset
Backed
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Total
 
 
   
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2011

 $1,325 $4,247 $51 $476 $5 $6,104 $(421)

Total gains (losses) included in:

                      

Net income

  7  48    8    63(1) (1,007)(2)

Other comprehensive income

  11  (110)   (18)   (117)  

Purchases

  189  556  104  118    967   

Sales

  (51) (2)       (53)  

Issues

              (149)

Settlements

  (122) (885) (4) (87)   (1,098) (8)

Transfers into Level 3

  7    1  14    22   

Transfers out of Level 3

  (11) (3,656) (102) (305)   (4,074)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2011

 $1,355 $198 $50 $206 $5 $1,814 $(1,585)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2011 included in:

                      

Net investment income

 $ $(32)$ $1 $ $(31)$ 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

              (1,035)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(2)
Represents a $148 million gain includedIncluded in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses and a $72 million loss included in other revenuesthe Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 
 Available-for-Sale Securities Future Policy
Benefits and
Claims: GMWB
and GMAB
Embedded
Derivatives

 
 
 Corporate
Debt
Securities

 Residential
Mortgage
Backed
Securities

 Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities
 Asset
Backed
Securities

 Common
Stocks

 Other
Structured
Investments

 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 $1,252 $3,982 $72 $455 $4 $58 $5,823 $(299)

Total gains included in:

                         

Net income

  1  55  1  12      69(1) 4(2)

Other comprehensive income

  30  292  10  38  1    371   

Purchases, sales, issues and settlements, net

  17  (61) 112  (5)   (58)(3) 5  (126)

Transfers into Level 3

  25            25   

Transfers out of Level 3

    (21) (144) (24)     (189)  
  

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $1,325 $4,247 $51 $476 $5 $ $6,104 $(421)
  

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2010 included in:

                         

Net investment income

 $ $54 $ $11 $ $ $65 $ 

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses

                (15)
  
(1)
Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)(2)
Included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(4)(3)
Represents primethe elimination of Ameriprise Financial's investment in CDOs, which were consolidated due to the adoption of a new accounting standard. See Note 2 and Note 4 for additional information related to the consolidation of CDOs.

The impact to pretax income of the Company's adjustment for nonperformance risk on the fair value of its GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives was an increase of $168 million and $28 million, net of DAC and DSIC amortization, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2011 transfers out of Level 3 to Level 2 included certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities previouslyand sub-prime non-agency residential mortgage backed securities classified as asset backed securities with a fair value of approximately $3.9 billion. The transfers reflect improved pricing transparency of these


Table of Contents

securities, a continuing trend of increased activity in the non-agency residential mortgage backed security market and increased observability of significant inputs to the valuation methodology. All other securities transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 forrepresent securities with fair values that are now obtained from a third party pricing service with observable inputs. Securities transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 represent securities with fair values that are now based on a single non-binding broker quote.

The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the beginning of the quarter in which management believes the market for these prime quality assets is now inactive.

(5)
Represents a $126 million gain included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses and a $69 million loss included in other revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
each transfer occurred.

During the reporting period,periods, there were no material assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

The following table provides the carrying value and the estimated fair value of financial instruments that are not reported at fair value. All other financial instruments that are reported at fair value have been included above in the table with balances of assets and liabilities Ameriprise Financial measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value 
 
 (in millions)
 

Financial Assets

             
 

Commercial mortgage loans, net

 $2,887 $2,643 $3,097 $3,076 
 

Policy loans

  729  785  705  705 
 

Receivables

  1,178  903  604  604 
 

Restricted and segregated cash

  1,883  1,883  1,332  1,332 
 

Other investments and assets

  521  419  306  304 

Financial Liabilities

             
 

Future policy benefits and claims

 $13,116 $12,418 $18,622 $18,077 
 

Investment certificate reserves

  4,869  5,010  3,739  3,732 
 

Banking and brokerage customer deposits

  3,355  3,355  2,467  2,482 
 

Separate account liabilities

  3,345  3,345  4,652  4,652 
 

Debt and other liabilities

  2,246  1,835  2,019  2,026 

 
 December 31, 2011
 December 31, 2010
 
 
   
 
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Financial Assets

             

Commercial mortgage loans, net

 $2,589 $2,772 $2,577 $2,671 

Policy loans

  742  715  733  808 

Receivables

  2,444  2,148  1,852  1,566 

Restricted and segregated cash

  1,500  1,500  1,516  1,516 

Assets held for sale

      18  18 

Other investments and assets

  390  388  331  338 

Financial Liabilities

             

Future policy benefits and claims

 $15,064 $16,116 $15,328 $15,768 

Investment certificate reserves

  2,766  2,752  3,127  3,129 

Banking and brokerage customer deposits

  7,078  7,091  5,638  5,642 

Separate account liabilities

  3,950  3,950  4,930  4,930 

Debt and other liabilities

  3,180  3,412  2,722  2,919 
  

Investments

The fair value of commercial mortgage loans, except those with significant credit deterioration, is determined by discounting contractual cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for loans with similar remaining maturities and


Table of Contents


characteristics including loan-to-value ratio, occupancy rate, refinance risk, debt-service coverage, location, and property condition. For commercial mortgage loans with significant credit deterioration, fair value is determined using the same adjustments as above with an additional adjustment for the Company's estimate of the amount recoverable on the loan.

The fair value of policy loans is determined using discounted cash flows.

Receivables

The fair value of consumer bankingbank loans is determined by discounting estimated cash flows and incorporating adjustments for prepayment, administration expenses, severity and credit loss estimates, with discount rates based on the Company's estimate of current market conditions.

Loans held for sale are measured at the lower of cost or market and fair value is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics.

Brokerage margin loans are measured at outstanding balances, which are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the sufficiency of the collateral and short term nature of these loans.

Restricted and segregated cashSegregated Cash

Restricted and segregated cash is generally set aside for specific business transactions and restrictions are specific to the Company and do not transfer to third party market participants,participants; therefore, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Amounts segregated under federal and other regulations may also reflect resale agreements and are measured at the cost at which the securities will be sold. This measurement is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between entering into the transaction and its expected realization and the reduced risk of credit loss due to pledging U.S. government-backed securities as collateral.


Table of Contents

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale reflect notes receivable of Securities America. See Note 1 and Note 24 for additional information on the Company's presentation of discontinued operations.

Other Investments and Assets

Other investments and assets primarily consist of syndicated loans. The fair value of syndicated loans is obtained from a third party pricing service.

Future policy benefitsPolicy Benefits and claimsClaims

The fair value of fixed annuities, in deferral status, is determined by discounting cash flows using a risk neutral discount rate with adjustments for profit margin, expense margin, early policy surrender behavior, a provision for adverse deviation from estimated early policy surrender behavior, and the Company's non-performancenonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. The fair value of other liabilities including non-life contingent fixed annuities in payout status, is determined by discounting cash flows using a risk neutral discount rate with adjustments for expense marginequity indexed annuity host contracts and the Company's non-performance risk specific to these liabilities. Variablefixed portion of a small number of variable annuity fixed sub-accountscontracts classified as investment contracts and equity indexed annuities fair value is determined by discounting cash flows adjusted for policyholder and contractholder behavior and the Company's non-performance risk specific to these liabilities.in a similar manner.

Customer depositsDeposits

The fair value of investment certificate reserves is determined by discounting cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for assets with similar terms and characteristics, with adjustments for early withdrawal behavior, penalty fees, expense margin and the Company's non-performancenonperformance risk specific to these liabilities.

Banking and brokerage customer deposits are liabilities with no defined maturities and fair value is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.

Separate account liabilitiesAccount Liabilities

Certain separate account liabilities are classified as investment contracts and are carried at an amount equal to the related separate account assets. Carrying value is a reasonable estimate of the fair value as it represents the exit value as evidenced by withdrawal transactions between contractholders and the Company. A non-performancenonperformance adjustment is not included as the related separate account assets act as collateral for these liabilities and minimize non-performancenonperformance risk.

Debt and other liabilitiesOther Liabilities

DebtThe fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted prices in active markets, when available. If quoted prices are not available fair values are obtained from nationally-recognizedthird party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques such as present value of cash flows.

The fair value of short-term borrowings is obtained from a third party service. A nonperformance adjustment is not included as collateral requirements for these borrowings minimize the nonperformance risk.

The fair value of future funding commitments to affordable housing partnerships is determined by discounting cash flows.


Table of Contents


15. Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Derivative instruments enable the Company to manage its exposure to various market risks. The value of such instruments is derived from an underlying variable or multiple variables, including equity, foreign exchange and interest rate indices or prices. The Company primarily enters into derivative agreements for risk management purposes related to the Company's products and operations.

The Company uses derivatives as economic hedges and accounting hedges. The following table presents the balance sheet location and the gross fair value of derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives:

 
  
 Asset  
 Liability 
 
  
 December 31,  
 December 31, 
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments

 Balance Sheet
Location

 Balance Sheet
Location

 
 2011
 2010
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
  
 (in millions)
 

Cash flow hedges

                 

Asset-based distribution fees

 Other assets $ $10 

Other liabilities

 $ $ 

Interest on debt

 Other assets     

Other liabilities

  11   

Fair value hedges

                 

Fixed rate debt

 Other assets  157  61 

Other liabilities

     
  

Total qualifying hedges

    157  71    11   
  

Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments

 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

GMWB and GMAB

                 

Interest rate contracts

 Other assets  1,801  366 

Other liabilities

  1,198  379 

Equity contracts

 Other assets  1,314  354 

Other liabilities

  1,031  665 

Credit contracts

 Other assets  1  4 

Other liabilities

    1 

Foreign currency contracts

 Other assets  7   

Other liabilities

  10   

Embedded derivatives(1)

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  1,585  421 
  

Total GMWB and GMAB

    3,123  724    3,824  1,466 
  

Other derivatives:

                 

Interest rate

                 

Interest rate lock commitments

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

     

Equity

                 

EIA

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

     

EIA embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  2  3 

IUL

 Other assets  1   

Other liabilities

     

IUL embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Future policy benefits and claims

  3   

Stock market certificates

 Other assets  34  89 

Other liabilities

  29  75 

Stock market certificates embedded derivatives

 N/A     

Customer deposits

  6  14 

Ameriprise Financial

                 

Franchise Advisor Deferred

                 

Compensation Plan

 Other assets  2  8 

Other liabilities

     

Seed money

 Other assets     

Other liabilities

  1   

Foreign exchange

                 

Foreign currency

 Other assets    1 

Other liabilities

  3  1 

Commodity

                 

Seed money

 Other assets  2   

Other liabilities

     
  

Total other

    39  100    44  93 
  

Total non-designated hedges

    3,162  824    3,868  1,559 
  

Total derivatives

   $3,319 $895   $3,879 $1,559 
  

N/A Not applicable.

(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.

See Note 14 for additional information regarding the Company's fair value measurement of derivative instruments.


Table of Contents


Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges

The following table presents a summary of the impact of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31:

 
  
 Amount of Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives Recognized in Income
 
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments

 Location of Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives Recognized in Income

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
 

GMWB and GMAB

            

Interest rate contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses $709 $95 $(435)

Equity contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  326  (370) (1,245)

Credit contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (12) (44) (65)

Foreign currency contracts

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (2)    

Embedded derivatives(1)

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses  (1,165) (121) 1,533 
  

Total GMWB and GMAB

    (144) (440) (212)
  

Other derivatives:

            

Interest rate

            

Interest rate lock commitments

 Other revenues  (1)    

Equity

            

GMDB

 Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses    (4) (10)

EIA

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  (1) 2  4 

EIA embedded derivatives

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  1  7  7 

IUL

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  1     

IUL embedded derivatives

 Interest credited to fixed accounts  (3)    

Stock market certificates

 Banking and deposit interest expense  1  9  15 

Stock market certificates embedded derivatives

 Banking and deposit interest expense    (10) (18)

Seed money

 Net investment income  4  (5) (14)

Ameriprise Financial

            

Franchise Advisor Deferred

            

Compensation Plan

 Distribution expenses  (4) 9   

Foreign exchange

            

Seed money

 General and administrative expense  (1) 1   

Foreign currency

 Net investment income  (3) (1)  

Commodity

            

Seed money

 Net investment income  1     
  

Total other

    (5) 8  (16)
  

Total derivatives

   $(149)$(432)$(228)
  
(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.

The Company holds derivative instruments that either do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. These derivative instruments are used as economic hedges of equity, interest rate, credit and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to various products and transactions of the Company.

The majority of the Company's annuity contracts contain GMDB provisions, which may result in a death benefit payable that exceeds the contract accumulation value when market values of customers' accounts decline. Certain annuity contracts contain GMWB or GMAB provisions, which guarantee the right to make limited partial withdrawals each contract year regardless of the volatility inherent in the underlying investments or guarantee a minimum accumulation value of consideration received at the beginning of the contract period, after a specified holding period, respectively. The Company economically hedges the exposure related to non-life contingent GMWB and GMAB provisions primarily using various futures, options, interest rate swaptions, interest rate swaps, variance swaps and credit default swaps. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the gross notional amount of derivative contracts for the Company's GMWB and GMAB provisions was $104.7 billion and $55.5 billion, respectively. The Company had previously entered into a limited number of derivative contracts to economically hedge equity exposure related to GMDB provisions on variable annuity contracts written in 2009. As of both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not have any outstanding hedges on its GMDB provisions.


Table of Contents

The deferred premium associated with some of the above options is paid or received semi-annually over the life of the option contract. The following is a summary of the payments the Company is scheduled to make and receive for these options:

 
 Premiums Payable
 Premiums Receivable
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

2012

 $372 $41 

2013

  349  26 

2014

  324  24 

2015

  296  22 

2016

  265  15 

2017-2026

  925  34 
  

Actual timing and payment amounts may differ due to future contract settlements, modifications or exercises of options prior to the full premium being paid or received.

EIA, IUL and stock market certificate products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. As a result of fluctuations in equity markets, the obligation incurred by the Company related to EIA, IUL and stock market certificate products will positively or negatively impact earnings over the life of these products. As a means of economically hedging its obligations under the provisions of these products, the Company enters into index options and futures contracts. The gross notional amount of these derivative contracts was $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company enters into forward contracts, futures, total return swaps and commodity swaps to manage its exposure to price risk arising from seed money investments in proprietary investment products. The gross notional amount of these contracts was $123 million and $174 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to economically hedge its exposure to certain receivables and obligations denominated in non-functional currencies. The gross notional amount of these contracts was $26 million and $21 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In 2010, the Company entered into a total return swap to economically hedge its exposure to equity price risk of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common stock granted as part of its Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan ("Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan"). In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company extended the contract through 2012. As part of the contract, the Company expects to cash settle the difference between the value of a fixed number of shares at the contract date (which may be increased from time to time) and the value of those shares over an unwind period ending on December 31, 2012. The gross notional value of this contract was $17 million and $35 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Embedded Derivatives

Certain annuities contain GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions, which are considered embedded derivatives. In addition, the equity component of the EIA, IUL and stock market certificate product obligations are also considered embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are bifurcated from their host contracts and reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. As discussed above, the Company uses derivatives to mitigate the financial statement impact of these embedded derivatives.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company has designated and accounts for the following as cash flow hedges: (i) interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate exposure on debt, (ii) interest rate lock agreements to hedge interest rate exposure on debt issuances and (iii) swaptions used to hedge the risk of increasing interest rates on forecasted fixed premium product sales. The Company previously designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges interest rate swaps to hedge certain asset-based distribution fees.

During the second quarter of 2011, the Company reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings a $27 million gain on an interest rate hedge put in place in anticipation of issuing debt between December 2010 and September 2011. The gain was reclassified due to the forecasted transaction not occurring according to the original hedge strategy. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, amounts recognized in earnings related to cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness were not material. The estimated net amount of existing pretax losses on December 31, 2011 that the Company expects to reclassify to earnings within the next twelve months is $2 million, which consists of $4 million of pretax gains to be recorded as a reduction to interest and debt expense and $6 million of pretax losses to be recorded in net investment income. The following tables present the impact of the effective portion of the


Table of Contents

Company's cash flow hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31:

 
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Interest on debt

 $(11)$16 $19 

Asset-based distribution fees

  1  20   
  

Total

 $(10)$36 $19 
  


 
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income into Income
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income into Income

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Other revenues

 $27 $ $ 

Interest and debt expense

  4  8  8 

Distribution fees

  9  11   

Net investment income

  (6) (6) (6)
  

Total

 $34 $13 $2 
  

The following is a summary of unrealized derivatives gains (losses) included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to cash flow hedges:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at January 1

 $18 $3 $(8)

Holding gains (losses)

  (10) 36  19 

Reclassification of realized gains

  (34) (13) (2)

Income tax benefit (provision)

  15  (8) (6)
  

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at December 31

 $(11)$18 $3 
  

Currently, the longest period of time over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 24 years and relates to forecasted debt interest payments.

Fair Value Hedges

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company entered into and designated as fair value hedges three interest rate swaps to convert senior notes due 2015, 2019 and 2020 from fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. The swaps have identical terms as the underlying debt being hedged so no ineffectiveness is expected to be realized. The Company recognizes gains and losses on the derivatives and the related hedged items within interest and debt expense. The following table presents the amounts recognized in income related to fair value hedges for the years ended December 31:

 
  
 Amount of Gain Recognized
in Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 Location of Gain Recorded into Income
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
  
 (in millions)
 

Fixed rate debt

 Interest and debt expense $41 $36 

Credit Risk

Credit risk associated with the Company's derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. To mitigate such risk, the Company has established guidelines and oversight of credit risk through a comprehensive enterprise risk management program that includes members of senior management. Key components of this program are to require preapproval of counterparties and the use of master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements whenever practical. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company held $802 million and $98 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents and recorded a corresponding liability in other liabilities for collateral the Company is obligated to return to counterparties. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had accepted additional collateral consisting of various securities with a fair value of $186 million and $23 million, respectively, which are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2011 and


Table of Contents

2010, the Company's maximum credit exposure related to derivative assets after considering netting arrangements with counterparties and collateral arrangements was approximately $72 million and $45 million, respectively.

Certain of the Company's derivative instruments contain provisions that adjust the level of collateral the Company is required to post based on the Company's debt rating (or based on the financial strength of the Company's life insurance subsidiaries for contracts in which those subsidiaries are the counterparty). Additionally, certain of the Company's derivative contracts contain provisions that allow the counterparty to terminate the contract if the Company's debt does not maintain a specific credit rating (generally an investment grade rating) or the Company's life insurance subsidiary does not maintain a specific financial strength rating. If these termination provisions were to be triggered, the Company's counterparty could require immediate settlement of any net liability position. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments in a net liability position containing such credit risk features was $112 million and $412 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for such instruments as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $103 million and $406 million, respectively. If the credit risk features of derivative contracts that were in a net liability position at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were triggered, the additional fair value of assets needed to settle these derivative liabilities would have been $9 million and $6 million, respectively.


16. Share-Based Compensation

The Company's share-based compensation plans consist of the Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2005 ICP"), the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan (the "2008 Plan"), the Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan, and the Ameriprise Advisor Group Deferred Compensation Plan ("Employee Advisor Deferral Plan").

The components of the Company's share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Stock options

 $43 $41 $53 

Restricted stock awards

  50(1) 37  59 

Restricted stock units

  52  80  70 

Liability awards

  13  40  (4)
  

Total

 $158 $198 $178 
  
(1)
Includes $19 million of expense related to the Threadneedle equity incentive plan.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, total income tax benefit recognized by the Company related to share-based compensation expense was $53 million, $67 million and $63 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, there was $132 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards under the Company's share-based compensation plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan

The 2005 ICP, which was amended and approved by shareholders on April 28, 2010, provides for the grant of cash and equity incentive awards to directors, employees and independent contractors, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares and similar awards designed to comply with the applicable federal regulations and laws of jurisdiction. Under the 2005 ICP, a maximum of 37.9 million shares may be issued. Of this total, no more than 6.0 million shares may be issued after April 28, 2010 for full value awards, which are awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. Shares issued under the 2005 ICP may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

Ameriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan

The Ameriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan ("DCP") gives certain employees the choice to defer a portion of their eligible compensation, which can be invested in investment options as provided by the DCP, including the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund. The DCP is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company provides a match on certain deferrals. Participant deferrals vest immediately and the Company match vests after three years. Distributions are made in shares of the Company's common stock for the portion of the deferral invested in the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund and the related Company match, for which the Company has recorded in equity. The DCP does allow for accelerated vesting of the share-based awards in cases of death, disability and qualified retirement. Compensation expense related to the Company match is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.


Table of Contents

Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan

The 2008 Plan is designed to align new employees' interests with those of the shareholders of the Company and attract and retain new employees. The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of equity incentive awards to new employees who became employees in connection with a merger or acquisition, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and other equity-based awards designed to comply with the applicable federal and foreign regulations and laws of jurisdiction. Under the 2008 Plan, a maximum of 6.0 million shares may be issued. Awards granted under the 2008 Plan may be settled in cash and/or shares of the Company's common stock according to the award's terms.

Stock Options

Stock options granted have an exercise price not less than 100% of the current fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock on the grant date and a maximum term of 10 years. Stock options granted generally vest ratably over three to four years. Vesting of option awards may be accelerated based on age and length of service. Stock options granted are expensed on a straight-line basis over the option vesting period based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The following weighted average assumptions were used for stock option grants:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  

Dividend yield

  1.3% 1.5% 2.0%

Expected volatility

  44% 50% 55%

Risk-free interest rate

  2.3% 2.3% 1.8%

Expected life of stock option (years)

  5.0  5.0  5.0 
  

The dividend yield assumption represents the Company's expected dividend yield based on its historical dividend payouts. The expected volatility is based on the Company's historical and implied volatilities. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the expected option life is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the grant date. The expected life of the option is based on the Company's past experience and other considerations.

The weighted average grant date fair value for options granted during 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $21.38, $15.89 and $8.93, respectively.

A summary of the Company's stock option activity for 2011 is presented below (shares and intrinsic value in millions):

 
 Shares
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price

 Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Years)

 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

 
  

Outstanding at January 1

  19.5 $35.96  6.7 $423 

Granted

  1.8  58.58       

Exercised

  (2.1) 30.63       

Forfeited

  (0.3) 30.75       
  

Outstanding at December 31

  18.9  38.85  5.3  241 
  

Exercisable at December 31

  12.1  40.56  5.0  132 
  

The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $58 million, $70 million and $2 million during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.


Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards generally vest ratably over three to four years or at the end of five years. Vesting of restricted stock awards may be accelerated based on age and length of service. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards is based on the market price of Ameriprise Financial stock on the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Quarterly dividends are paid on restricted stock, as declared by the Company's Board of Directors, during the vesting period and are not subject to forfeiture.

Certain advisors receive a portion of their compensation in the form of restricted stock awards which are subject to forfeiture based on future service requirements.

A summary of the Company's restricted stock award activity for 2011 is presented below (shares in millions):

 
 Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant-date Fair Value

 
  

Non-vested shares at January 1

  3.6 $31.08 

Granted

  0.5  58.68 

Vested

  (1.0) 40.36 

Forfeited

  (0.2) 32.71 
  

Non-vested shares at December 31

  2.9  32.33 
  

The fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $54 million, $42 million and $27 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

The 2005 ICP provides for the grant of deferred share units to non-employee directors of the Company and restricted stock units to employees. The director awards are fully vested upon issuance. The deferred share units are settled for Ameriprise Financial common stock upon the director's termination of service. The employee awards generally vest ratably over three to four years. Compensation expense for deferred share units and restricted stock units is based on the market price of Ameriprise Financial stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units granted to employees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or on an accelerated basis due to retirement eligibility. Deferred share units granted to non-employee directors are expensed immediately. Restricted stock units include units awarded under the DCP.

As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 1.4 million units outstanding of restricted stock units, including deferred share units, of which approximately 1.1 million units were fully vested.

Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan

The Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan, which was amended in January 2011, gives certain advisors the choice to defer a portion of their commissions into share-based awards or other investment options. The Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Prior to 2011, all deferrals were in the form of share-based awards and the Company provided a match on the advisor deferrals, which participants could elect to receive in cash or shares of common stock. The Company provided a 15% stock match for 2010 and a 25% stock match for 2009 on eligible deferrals.

The Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan allows for the grant of share-based awards of up to 8.5 million shares of common stock. The number of units awarded is based on the performance measures, deferral percentage and the market value of Ameriprise Financial common stock on the deferral date as defined by the plan. Share-based awards made during 2011 are fully vested and are not subject to forfeitures. Share-based awards made prior to 2011 generally vest ratably over four years, beginning on January 1 of the year following the plan year in which the award was made. In addition to the voluntary deferral, certain advisors are eligible for the Franchise Advisor Top Performer Stock Award or the Franchise Consultant Growth Bonus. The Franchise Advisor Top Performer Stock Award allows eligible advisors to earn additional deferred stock awards on commissions over a specified threshold. The awards vest ratably over four years. The Franchise Consultant Growth Bonus allows eligible advisors who coach other advisors the ability to earn a bonus based on the success of the advisors they coach, which can be deferred into the plan. The awards vest ratably over three years. The Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan allows for accelerated vesting of the share-based awards based on age and years as an advisor. Commission expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. However, as franchise advisors are not employees of the Company, the expense is adjusted each period based on the stock price of the Company's common stock up to the vesting date. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, expense related to share-based units awarded under the Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan was $38 million, $70 million and $60 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 5.2 million units outstanding under the Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan, of which approximately 4.4 million were fully vested.


Table of Contents


Ameriprise Advisor Group Deferred Compensation Plan

The Employee Advisor Deferral Plan, which was created in April 2009, allows for employee advisors to receive share-based bonus awards which are subject to future service requirements and forfeitures. The Employee Advisor Deferral Plan is an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Employee Advisor Deferral Plan also gives qualifying employee advisors the choice to defer a portion of their base salary or commissions beginning in 2010. This deferral can be in the form of share-based awards or other investment options. Deferrals are not subject to future service requirements or forfeitures. Under the Employee Advisor Deferral Plan, a maximum of 3.0 million shares may be issued. Awards granted under the Employee Advisor Deferral Plan may be settled in cash and/or shares of the Company's common stock according to the award's terms.

As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 0.3 million units outstanding under the Employee Advisor Deferral Plan, of which nil were fully vested.

Threadneedle Equity Incentive Plan

On an annual basis, certain key Threadneedle employees are eligible for awards under an equity incentive plan ("EIP") based on a formula tied to Threadneedle's financial performance. Awards under the EIP were first made in April 2009; prior awards were made under the equity participation plan ("EPP"). In 2011, Threadneedle's articles of incorporation were amended to create a new class of Threadneedle corporate units to be granted under a modified EIP plan. Employees who held EIP units granted prior to 2011 were given the choice to exchange their existing units at the exchange date. EIP awards may be settled in cash or Threadneedle corporate units according to the award's terms. For awards granted prior to 2011, the EIP provides for 100% vesting after three years, with a mandatory call after six years. For converted units and awards granted after February 2011, the EIP provides for 100% vesting after two and a half years, with no mandatory call date. Converted units and units granted after February 2011 have dividend rights once fully vested. The EPP provides for 50% vesting after three years and 50% vesting after four years, with required cash-out after five years. EIP and EPP awards are subject to forfeitures based on future service requirements.

The value of the awards is recognized as compensation expense evenly over the vesting periods. Generally, the expense is based on the grant date fair value of the awards as determined by an annual independent valuation of Threadneedle's fair market value; however, for awards accounted for as a liability the expense is adjusted to reflect Threadneedle's current calculated value (the change in the value of the awards is recognized immediately for vested awards and over the remaining vesting period for unvested awards). During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, cash settlements of EPP and EIP awards were $14 million, $18 million and $5 million, respectively.


17. Shareholders' Equity

The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized securities gains

 $770 $615 

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses)

  (11) 18 

Defined benefit plans

  (75) (24)

Foreign currency translation

  (46) (44)
  

Total

 $638 $565 
  

See Note 5, Note 15 and Note 21 for additional disclosures related to net unrealized securities gains, net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) and net unrealized actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit plans, respectively.

In May 2010, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the expenditure of up to $1.5 billion for the repurchase of the Company's common stock through the date of its 2012 annual meeting. In June 2011, the Company's Board of Directors authorized an additional expenditure of up to $2.0 billion for the repurchase of the Company's common stock through June 28, 2013. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company repurchased a total of 27.9 million shares and 13.1 million shares, respectively, of its common stock for an aggregate cost of $1.5 billion and $573 million, respectively. There were no share repurchases during the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had $1.5 billion remaining under the share repurchase authorization.

The Company may also reacquire shares of its common stock under its 2005 ICP related to restricted stock awards. Restricted shares that are forfeited before the vesting period has lapsed are recorded as treasury shares. In addition, the holders of restricted shares may elect to surrender a portion of their shares on the vesting date to cover their income tax obligations. These vested restricted shares reacquired by the Company and the Company's payment of the holders' income tax obligations are recorded as a treasury share purchase. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the


Table of Contents

restricted shares forfeited under the 2005 ICP and recorded as treasury shares were 0.1 million, 0.3 million and 0.3 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company reacquired 0.5 million, 0.4 million and 0.5 million shares, respectively, of its common stock through the surrender of restricted shares upon vesting and paid in the aggregate $25 million, $17 million and $11 million, respectively, related to the holders' income tax obligations on the vesting date.

In 2011, the Company reissued 1.7 million treasury shares for restricted stock award grants and issuance of shares vested under the Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan. In 2011 and 2010, the Company reacquired 0.3 million and 0.1 million shares, respectively, of its common stock with an aggregate value of $13 million and $7 million, respectively, from a total return swap used to economically hedge its Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan. See Note 15 for additional information. In 2009, the Company issued and sold 36 million shares of its common stock. The proceeds of $869 million were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's acquisition of the long-term asset management business of the Columbia Management Group.


18. Earnings per Share Attributable to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Common Shareholders

The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common shareholders are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
 

Numerator:

          

Income from continuing operations

 $1,030 $1,284 $736 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (106) 163  15 
  

Income from continuing operations attributable to Ameriprise Financial

  1,136  1,121  721 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (60) (24) 1 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $1,076 $1,097 $722 
  

Denominator:

          

Basic: Weighted-average common shares outstanding

  241.4  257.4  242.2 

Effect of potentially dilutive nonqualified stock options

          

and other share-based awards

  4.9  4.9  2.2 
  

Diluted: Weighted-average common shares outstanding

  246.3  262.3  244.4 

Earnings per share attributable to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common shareholders:

          

Basic:

          

Income from continuing operations

 $4.71 $4.36 $2.98 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (0.25) (0.10)  
  

Net income

 $4.46 $4.26 $2.98 
  

Diluted:

          

Income from continuing operations

 $4.61 $4.27 $2.95 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  (0.24) (0.09)  
  

Net income

 $4.37 $4.18 $2.95 
  


19. Regulatory Requirements

Restrictions on the transfer of funds exist under regulatory requirements applicable to certain of the Company's subsidiaries. At December 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of unrestricted net assets was approximately $1.6 billion.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") defines Risk-Based Capital ("RBC") requirements for insurance companies. The RBC requirements are used by the NAIC and state insurance regulators to identify companies that merit regulatory actions designed to protect policyholders. These requirements apply to both the Company's life and property casualty insurance companies. In addition, IDS Property Casualty is subject to the statutory surplus requirements of the State of Wisconsin. The Company's life and property casualty companies each met their respective minimum RBC requirements.

State insurance statutes also contain limitations as to the amount of dividends and distributions that insurers may make without providing prior notification to state regulators. For RiverSource Life, dividends or distributions in excess of statutory unassigned surplus, as determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the State of Minnesota, require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, RiverSource Life's primary regulator, and are subject to


Table of Contents

potential disapproval. In addition, dividends whose fair market value, together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12 months, exceeds the greater of (i) the previous year's statutory net gain from operations or (ii) 10% of the previous year-end statutory capital and surplus are referred to as "extraordinary dividends." Extraordinary dividends also require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, and are subject to potential disapproval. Government debt securities of $7 million and $6 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, held by the Company's life insurance subsidiaries were on deposit with various states as required by law and satisfied legal requirements. Statutory capital and surplus for RiverSource Life were $2.7 billion, $3.7 billion and $3.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Ameriprise Certificate Company ("ACC") is registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). ACC markets and sells investment certificates to clients. ACC is subject to various capital requirements under the 1940 Act, laws of the State of Minnesota and understandings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the Minnesota Department of Commerce. The terms of the investment certificates issued by ACC and the provisions of the 1940 Act also require the maintenance by ACC of qualified assets. Under the provisions of its certificates and the 1940 Act, ACC was required to have qualified assets (as that term is defined in Section 28(b) of the 1940 Act) in the amount of $2.8 billion and $3.1 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. ACC had qualified assets of $2.9 billion and $3.4 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Ameriprise Financial and ACC entered into a Capital Support Agreement on March 2, 2009, pursuant to which Ameriprise Financial agrees to commit such capital to ACC as is necessary to satisfy applicable minimum capital requirements, up to a maximum commitment of $115 million. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, ACC did not draw upon the Capital Support Agreement and had met all applicable capital requirements.

Threadneedle's required capital is predominantly based on the requirements specified by its regulator, the Financial Services Authority, under its Capital Adequacy Requirements for asset managers.

The Company has four broker-dealer subsidiaries, American Enterprise Investment Services Inc., Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc., RiverSource Distributors, Inc. and Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. The broker-dealers are subject to the net capital requirements of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") and the Uniform Net Capital requirements of the SEC under Rule 15c3-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Ameriprise Trust Company is subject to capital adequacy requirements under the laws of the State of Minnesota as enforced by the Minnesota Department of Commerce.

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the responsibility for ongoing examination, supervision and regulation of federal savings associations, including Ameriprise Bank, transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") to the Office of the Comptroller of Currency ("OCC") effective July 21, 2011. Ameriprise Bank is required to maintain sufficient capital in compliance with the OCC regulations and policies. Typically, the OCC requires savings banks to maintain a Tier 1 (core) capital requirement based upon 4.00% of total adjusted assets, total risk-based capital based upon 8.00% of total risk-weighted assets, as well as Tier 1 risk-based capital based upon 4.00% of total risk-weighted assets and a tangible capital ratio of at least 1.50%. Ameriprise Bank agreed with the regulators to maintain its Tier 1 capital-to-assets leverage ratio at or above 7.50%, rather than the OCC-regulated Tier 1 (core) capital requirement of 4.00% and keep its total risk-based capital ratio at or above 12.00%. As a thrift, Ameriprise Bank is also required to maintain 65.00% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments, which include mortgage and consumer-related loans and investments. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, Ameriprise Bank had met all applicable capital requirements.


20. Income Taxes

The components of income tax provision attributable to continuing operations were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Current income tax:

          

Federal

 $250 $(224)$200 

State and local

  21  13  4 

Foreign

  23  32  4 
  

Total current income tax

  294  (179) 208 
  

Deferred income tax:

          

Federal

  68  540  (13)

State and local

  1  (5) (7)

Foreign

  (8) (6) (4)
  

Total deferred income tax

  61  529  (24)
  

Total income tax provision

 $355 $350 $184 
  

Table of Contents

The geographic sources of pretax income from continuing operations were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

United States

 $1,288 $1,470 $883 

Foreign

  97  164  37 
  

Total

 $1,385 $1,634 $920 
  

The principal reasons that the aggregate income tax provision attributable to continuing operations is different from that computed by using the U.S. statutory rate of 35% were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  

Tax at U.S. statutory rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

Changes in taxes resulting from:

          

Dividend exclusion

  (8.9) (4.1) (7.6)

Tax-exempt interest income

  (1.3) (1.0) (1.3)

Tax credits

  (3.4) (2.5) (5.8)

State taxes, net of federal benefit

  1.0  0.2  (0.4)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  2.7  (3.4) (0.6)

Other, net

  0.5  (2.7) 0.7 
  

Income tax provision

  25.6% 21.5% 20.0%
  

The increase in the Company's effective tax rate in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily reflects the change in the noncontrolling interests which is included in pretax income, partially offset by a favorable audit settlement related to the dividends received deduction. The increase in the Company's effective tax rate in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily reflects an increase in pretax income relative to tax advantaged items, which was partially offset by $53 million in benefits from tax planning and the completion of certain audits.

Accumulated earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries, which totaled $89 million at December 31, 2011, are intended to be permanently reinvested outside the United States. Accordingly, U.S. federal taxes, which would have aggregated $9 million, have not been provided on those earnings.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities measured for GAAP reporting versus income tax return purposes. The significant components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which are included net within other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Deferred income tax assets:

       

Liabilities for future policy benefits and claims

 $1,615 $1,329 

Investment impairments and write-downs

  118  119 

Deferred compensation

  274  241 

Investment related

    56 

Loss carryovers and tax credit carryforwards

  134  134 

Other

  89  70 
  

Gross deferred income tax assets

  2,230  1,949 

Less: Valuation allowance

  (5)  
  

Total deferred income tax assets

  2,225  1,949 
  

Deferred income tax liabilities:

       

Deferred acquisition costs

  1,418  1,473 

Investment related

  260   

Deferred sales inducement costs

  180  191 

Net unrealized gains on Available-for-Sale securities

  396  312 

Depreciation expense

  182  138 

Intangible assets

  60  52 

Other

  71  85 
  

Gross deferred income tax liabilities

  2,567  2,251 
  

Net deferred income tax liabilities

 $(342)$(302)
  

Table of Contents

The Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of the deferred tax assets that management believes will not be realized. Included in deferred tax assets is a significant deferred tax asset relating to capital losses that have been recognized for financial statement purposes but not yet for tax return purposes. Under current U.S. federal income tax law, capital losses generally must be used against capital gain income within five years of the year in which the capital losses are recognized for tax purposes. Significant judgment is required in determining if a valuation allowance should be established, and the amount of such allowance if required. Factors used in making this determination include estimates relating to the performance of the business including the ability to generate capital gains. Consideration is given to, among other things in making this determination, (i) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, (ii) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, (iii) taxable income in prior carryback years, and (iv) tax planning strategies. Based on analysis of the Company's tax position, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the full benefit of certain state net operating losses and therefore a valuation allowance of $5 million has been established as of December 31, 2011.

Included in the Company's deferred income tax assets are tax benefits related to capital loss carryforwards of $30 million which will expire beginning December 31, 2015, tax credits of $65 million which will expire beginning December 31, 2027, and state net operating losses of $39 million which will expire beginning December 31, 2014. As a result of the Company's ability to file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return including the Company's life insurance subsidiaries, as well as the expected level of taxable income, management believes the Company's capital loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards will be utilized before they expire.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits (expense) were as follows:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at January 1

 $75 $(33)$(56)

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

  1  2  1 

Additions for tax positions of prior years

  95  57  45 

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

  (8) (42) (23)

Settlements

  21  91   
  

Balance at December 31

 $184 $75 $(33)
  

If recognized, approximately $38 million, $54 million and $81 million, net of federal tax benefits, of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively, would affect the effective tax rate.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision. The Company recognized $66 million of interest and penalties for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company recognized a net reduction of $17 million in interest and penalties for the year ended December 31, 2010 and an increase of $1 million in interest and penalties for the year ended December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had a payable of $37 million and a receivable of $29 million, respectively, related to accrued interest and penalties.

It is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months. Based on the current audit position of the Company, it is estimated that the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by $150 million to $160 million in the next 12 months.

The Company or one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") had previously completed its field examination of the 1997 through 2007 tax returns in recent years as part of the overall examination of the American Express Company consolidated returns. However, for federal income tax purposes these years except for 2007, continue to remain open as a consequence of certain issues under appeal. The IRS is currently auditing the Company's U.S. income tax returns for 2008 and 2009. The Company's or certain of its subsidiaries' state income tax returns are currently under examination by various jurisdictions for years ranging from 1999 through 2009. The Company's federal and state income tax returns remain open for the years after 2009.

It is possible there will be corporate tax reform in the next few years. While impossible to predict, corporate tax reform is likely to include a reduction in the corporate tax rate coupled with reductions in tax preferred items. Potential tax reform may also affect the U.S. tax rules regarding international operations. Any changes could have a material impact on the income tax expense and the deferred tax balances of the Company.


Table of Contents

The items comprising other comprehensive income are presented net of the following income tax provision (benefit) amounts:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized securities gains

 $77 $167 $753 

Net unrealized derivatives gains

  (15) 8  6 

Defined benefit plans

  (28) (2) 10 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  (1) (6) 15 
  

Net income tax provision

 $33 $167 $784 
  


21. Retirement Plans and Profit Sharing Arrangements

Defined Benefit Plans

Pension Plans

The Company's U.S. non-advisor employees in the United States are generally eligible to participate infor the Ameriprise Financial Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan"), a noncontributory defined benefit plan which is a qualified plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), under which the cost of retirement benefits for eligible employees in the United States is measured by length of service, compensation and other factors and is currently being funded through a trust.. Funding of retirement costs for the Retirement Plan complies with the applicable minimum funding requirements specified by ERISA.ERISA and is held in a trust. The Retirement Plan is a cash balance plan by which the employees' accrued benefits are based on notional account balances, which are maintained for each individual. Each pay period these balances are credited with an amount equal to a percentage (determined by an employee's age plus service) of eligible compensation as defined by the Retirement Plan (which includes, but is not limited to, base pay, certainperformance based incentive pay, and commissions, shift differential overtime and transition pay)overtime). Prior to March 1, 2010, the percentage ranged from 2.5% to 10% based on employees' age plus years of service. Effective March 1, 2010, the percentage ranged from 2.5% to 5% based on employees' years of service. Employees eligible for the plan at the time of the change remain under the previous schedule until the new schedule becomes more favorable. Employees' balances are also credited daily with a fixed rate of interest that is updated each January 1 and is based on the average of the daily five-year U.S. Treasury Note yields for the previous October 1 through November 30, with a minimum crediting rate of 5%. Employees have the option to receive annuity payments or a lump sum payout at vested termination, retirement, death or retirement.disability. The Retirement Plan's year-end is September 30.

In addition, the Company sponsors an unfunded non-qualifiedthe Ameriprise Financial Supplemental Retirement Plan (the "SRP"), an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan is for certain highly compensated employees to replace the benefit that cannot be provided by the Retirement Plan due to Internal Revenue ServiceIRS limits. The SRP generally parallels the Retirement Plan but offers different payment options.

Most employees outside the United States are covered by local retirement plans, some of which are funded, while other employees receive payments at the time of retirement or termination under applicable labor laws or agreements.

The components of the net periodic pensionbenefit cost for all pension plans were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Service cost

 $34 $37 $38 

Interest cost

  25  22  20 

Expected return on plan assets

  (22) (21) (18)

Amortization of prior service cost

  (2) (2) (2)

Recognized net actuarial loss

    1  1 

Other

  3  (2)  
        

Net periodic pension benefit cost

 $38 $35 $39 
        

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Service cost

 $38 $33 $32 

Interest cost

  23  23  25 

Expected return on plan assets

  (26) (23) (22)

Amortization of prior service costs

  (1) (2) (1)

Amortization of net (gain)/loss

  1     

Other

  4  3  3 
  

Net periodic benefit cost

 $39 $34 $37 
  

The prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of active participants. Actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of assets are amortized on a straight linestraight-line basis over the expected average remaining service period of active participants.


Table of Contents

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the benefit obligation and fair value of assets for the pension plans. The Retirement Plan's year-end is September 30.plans:


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2008, the Company adopted the measurement provisions of SFAS 158 which requires the measurement of plan assets and benefit obligations to be as of the same date as the Company's fiscal year-end balance sheet.

 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Benefit obligation, beginning of period

 $372 $356 

Effect of eliminating early measurement date

  7   

Service cost

  34  37 

Interest cost

  25  22 

Plan amendments

    1 

Benefits paid

  (6) (7)

Actuarial gain

  (14) (12)

Curtailments

  (1)  

Settlements

  (17) (25)

Foreign currency rate changes

  (15)  
      

Benefit obligation, end of period

 $385 $372 
      
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Benefit obligation, January 1

 $469 $421 

Service cost

  38  33 

Interest cost

  23  23 

Benefits paid

  (6) (6)

Actuarial loss

  40  23 

Settlements

  (18) (24)

Foreign currency rate changes

    (1)
  

Benefit obligation, December 31

 $546 $469 
  

 

 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period

 $309 $275 

Effect of eliminating early measurement date

  (2)  

Actual return (loss) on plan assets

  (88) 50 

Employer contributions

  21  16 

Benefits paid

  (6) (7)

Settlements

  (16) (25)

Foreign currency rate changes

  (18)  
      

Fair value of plan assets, end of period

 $200 $309 
      

 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Fair value of plan assets, January 1

 $327 $256 

Actual return on plan assets

  (12) 39 

Employer contributions

  72  64 

Benefits paid

  (6) (6)

Settlements

  (18) (24)

Foreign currency rate changes

  (1) (2)
  

Fair value of plan assets, December 31

 $362 $327 
  

The following table provides the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, which equal the funded status of the Company's pension plans:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Benefit liability

 $(190)$(77)

Benefit asset

  4  14 
      

Net amount recognized

 $(186)$(63)
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Benefit liability

 $(189)$(162)

Benefit asset

  5  20 
  

Net amount recognized

 $(184)$(142)
  

The Company complies with the minimum funding requirements in all countries.

The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (net(loss), net of tax) that arosetax, as of December 31, 2008,2011 but were not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost included an unrecognized actuarial loss of $41$87 million and an unrecognized prior service costcredit of nil.$5 million. The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (net(loss), net of tax)tax, into net periodic benefit cost in 20092012 include an actuarial loss of nil and a prior service credit of $1 million.

The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans as of December 31, 20082011 and September 30, 20072010 was $331$493 million and $292$423 million, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations that exceeded the fair value of plan assets were as follows:

 
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2007
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 $302 $31 

Fair value of plan assets

  158   


 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 $434 $376 

Fair value of plan assets

  282  248 
  

Table of Contents

The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with projected benefit obligations that exceeded the fair value of plan assets were as follows:

 
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2007
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Projected benefit obligation

 $348 $325 

Fair value of plan assets

  158  249 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Projected benefit obligation

 $470 $410 

Fair value of plan assets

  282  248 
  

Table of Contents

The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for pension plans were as follows:

 
 2008 2007 

Discount rates

  6.22% 6.17%

Rates of increase in compensation levels

  4.23  4.22 

 
 2011
 2010
 
  

Discount rates

  4.15% 4.75%

Rates of increase in compensation levels

  4.27  4.25 
  

The weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for pension plans were as follows:

 
 2008 2007 2006 

Discount rates

  6.17% 5.74% 5.46%

Rates of increase in compensation levels

  4.22  4.14  4.41 

Expected long term rates of return on assets

  8.20  8.21  8.20 

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  

Discount rates

  4.75% 5.28% 6.22%

Rates of increase in compensation levels

  4.25  4.22  4.23 

Expected long-term rates of return on assets

  8.00  8.00  8.20 
  

In developing the 2008, 2007 and 2006 expected long termlong-term rate of return on assets, assumption, management evaluated input from an external consulting firm, including their projection of asset class return expectations and long termlong-term inflation assumptions. The Company also considered the historical returns on the plans' assets. Discount rates are based on yields available on high-quality corporate bonds that would generate cash flows necessary to pay the benefits when due.

The asset allocation for the Company's pension plans at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007, and the target allocation for 2009, by asset category,plans' assets are below. Actual allocations will generally be within 5% of these targets.

 
  
 Percentage of Plan Assets 
 
 Target
Allocation
2009
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2007
 

Equity securities

  73% 66% 73%

Debt securities

  21  31  21 

Other

  6  3  6 
        

Total

  100% 100% 100%
        

The Company investsinvested in an aggregate diversified portfolio to minimize the impact of any adverse or unexpected results from a security class on the entire portfolio. Diversification is interpreted to include diversification by asset type, performance and risk characteristics and number of investments. When appropriate and consistent with the objectives of the plans, derivative instruments may be used to mitigate risk or provide further diversification, subject to the investment policies of the plans. Asset classes and ranges considered appropriate for investment of the plans' assets are determined by each plan's investment committee. The asset classes typically include domestictarget allocations are 70% equity securities, 20% debt securities and foreign equities,10% all other types of investments, except for the assets in pooled pension funds which are 82% equity securities, 14% debt securities, and 4% all other types of investments. Actual allocations will generally be within 5% of these targets. At December 31, 2011, there were no significant holdings of any single issuer and the exposure to derivative instruments was not significant.

The following tables present the Company's pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 December 31, 2011 
Asset Category
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Equity securities:

             

U.S. large cap stocks

 $75 $9 $ $84 

U.S. small cap stocks

  38  1    39 

Non-U.S. large cap stocks

  14  23    37 

Emerging markets

  10  15    25 

Debt securities:

             

U.S. investment grade bonds

  17  15    32 

U.S. high yield bonds

    11    11 

Non-U.S. investment grade bonds

    16    16 

Real estate investment trusts

      11  11 

Hedge funds

      12  12 

Pooled pension funds

    80    80 

Cash equivalents

  15      15 
  

Total

 $169 $170 $23 $362 
  

Table of Contents


 
 December 31, 2010 
Asset Category
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Equity securities:

             

U.S. large cap stocks

 $72 $3 $ $75 

U.S. small cap stocks

  33  1    34 

Non-U.S. large cap stocks

  12  18    30 

Emerging markets

  15  14    29 

Debt securities:

             

U.S. investment grade bonds

  13  9    22 

U.S. high yield bonds

    11    11 

Non-U.S. investment grade bonds

    12    12 

Real estate investment trusts

      8  8 

Hedge funds

      9  9 

Pooled pension funds

    79    79 

Cash equivalents

  18      18 
  

Total

 $163 $147 $17 $327 
  

Equity securities are managed to track the performance of common market indices for both U.S. and non-U.S. securities, primarily across large cap, small cap and emerging market equities, domesticasset classes. Debt securities are managed to track the performance of common market indices for both U.S. and foreignnon-U.S. investment grade bonds as well as a pool of U.S. high yield bonds. Real estate investment trusts are managed to track the performance of a broad population of investment grade non-agricultural income producing properties. The Company's investments in hedge funds include investments in a multi-strategy fund and high-yield bondsan off-shore fund managed to track the performance of broad fund of fund indices. Pooled pension funds are managed to return 1.5% in excess of a common index of similar pooled pension funds on a rolling three year basis. Cash equivalents consist of holdings in a money market fund that seeks to equal the return of the three month U.S. Treasury bill.

The fair value of real estate investment trusts is based primarily on the underlying cash flows of the properties within the trusts which are significant unobservable inputs and domestic real estate.classified as Level 3. The fair value of the hedge funds is based on the proportionate share of the underlying net assets of the funds, which are significant unobservable inputs and classified as Level 3. The fair value of pooled pension funds and equity securities held in collective trust funds is based on the fund's NAV and classified as Level 2 as they trade in principal-to-principal markets. Equity securities and mutual funds traded in active markets are classified as Level 1. For debt securities and cash equivalents, the valuation techniques and classifications are consistent with those used for the Company's own investments as described in Note 14.

The following table provides a summary of changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Asset Category
 Real Estate
Investment Trusts

 Hedge Funds
 
  

Balance at January 1, 2010

 $5 $ 

Actual return on plan assets:

       

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  1   

Purchases, sales, and settlements, net

  2  9 
  

Balance at December 31, 2010

  8  9 

Actual return on plan assets:

       

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  1   

Purchases

  2  11 

Sales

    (8)
  

Balance at December 31, 2011

 $11 $12 
  

The Company's retirementpension plans expect to make benefit payments to retirees as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

2009

 $45 

2010

  41 

2011

  46 

2012

  45 

2013

  47 

2014-2018

  218 

 
 (in millions)
 
  

2012

 $45 

2013

  48 

2014

  49 

2015

  51 

2016

  53 

2017-2021

  250 
  

The Company expects to contribute $36$46 million to its pension plans in 2009.


Table of Contents2012.

Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company sponsors defined benefit postretirement plans that provide health care and life insurance to retired U.S. employees. Net periodic postretirement benefit costs were $1 million in 2008nil, nil and $2 million in 20072011, 2010 and 2006.2009, respectively.


Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the defined postretirement benefit plan obligation:

 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Benefit obligation, beginning of period

 $25 $30 

Effect of eliminating early measurement date

  (1)  

Interest cost

  1  2 

Benefits paid

  (6) (7)

Participant contributions

  5  6 

Plan amendments

  2   

Actuarial (gain) loss

  2  (6)
      

Benefit obligation, end of period

 $28 $25 
      

 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Benefit obligation, January 1

 $21 $22 

Interest cost

  1  1 

Benefits paid

  (5) (5)

Participant contributions

  4  4 

Actuarial gain

  (2) (1)
  

Benefit obligation, December 31

 $19 $21 
  

The recognized liabilities for the Company's defined postretirement benefit plans are unfunded. At December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, the recognized liabilities were $28$19 million and $24$21 million, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007,respectively, which was equal to the funded status of the Company's postretirement benefit plans was equal to the net amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.plans.

The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (net(loss), net of tax) that arosetax, as of December 31, 20082011 but were not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost included an unrecognized actuarial gain of $3$7 million and an unrecognized prior service cost of nil. The estimated amount that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (net(loss), net of tax)tax, into net periodic benefit cost in 20092012 is approximately nil.$1 million.

The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for other postretirement benefits were as follows:

 
 2008 2007 

Discount rates

  6.25% 6.20%

Healthcare cost increase rates:

       
 

Following year

  8.50  9.00 
 

Decreasing to the year 2016

  5.00  5.00 

 
 2011
 2010
 
  

Discount rates

  4.15% 4.90%

Healthcare cost increase rates:

       

Following year

  7.00  7.50 

Decreasing to the year 2016

  5.00  5.00 
  

Discount rates are based on yields available on high-quality corporate bonds that would generate cash flows necessary to pay the benefits when due.

A one percentage-point change in the assumed healthcare cost trend rates would not have a material effect on the Company's postretirement benefit obligation or net periodic postretirement benefit costs.

The Company's defined benefit postretirement benefit plans expect to make benefit payments to retirees as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

2009

 $3 

2010

  3 

2011

  3 

2012

  3 

2013

  3 

2014-2018

  13 

 
 (in millions)
 
  

2012

 $2 

2013

  2 

2014

  2 

2015

  1 

2016

  1 

2017-2021

  7 
  

The Company expects to contribute $3$2 million to its defined benefit postretirement plans in 2009.2012.

The following is a summary of unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income related to the Company's defined benefit plans:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized defined benefit losses at January 1

 $(24)$(20)$(39)

Net gains (losses)

  (77) (4) 15 

Prior service cost (credit)

  (2) (2) 14 

Income tax benefit (provision)

  28  2  (10)
  

Net unrealized defined benefit losses at December 31

 $(75)$(24)$(20)
  

Table of Contents

Defined Contribution Plan

In addition to the plans described previously, certain Companythe Company's employees are generally eligible to participate in the Ameriprise Financial 401(k) Plan (the "401(k) Plan"). The 401(k) Plan allows qualifiedeligible employees to make contributions through payroll deductions up to IRS limits and invest their contributions in one or more of the 401(k) Plan investment options, which include the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund. TheEffective March 1, 2010, the Company matches 100% of the first 5% of eligible compensation an employee contributes on a pretax or Roth 401(k) basis for each annual period. Prior to March 1, 2010, the Company matched 100% of the first 3% of base salarypay an employee contributescontributed on a pre-taxpretax basis each pay period. TheEffective March 1, 2010, the Company may also makeno longer makes an annual discretionary variable match contributions, which replaced the discretionary profit sharing contributions effective January 1, 2007. The final profit sharing contribution was made in March


Table of Contents


2007 for the 2006 plan year. The variable match contributions are based primarily on the performance of the Company. In addition,match. Prior to May 2009, the Company makes a contributionalso made contributions equal to 1% of base salarypay each pay period. This contribution isperiod, which were automatically invested in the Ameriprise Financial Stock Fund, which invests primarily in the Company's common stock, and can be redirected at any time into other 401(k) Plan investment options.Fund.

Under the 401(k) Plan, employees become eligible for all contributions under the plan onduring the first pay period followingthey reach 60 days of service. Employees must be employed on the last working day of the year to receive the Company's variable match contributions. For plan years beginning in 2007, fixedFixed and variable match contributions and stock contributions vest on a five-year graded scheduleare fully vested after five years of 20% per year of service. For plan years 2006 and prior, match and stock contributions vested immediately. Profit sharing contributions for plan years 2006 and prior generally vest afterservice, vesting ratably over the first five years of service. The Company's defined contribution plan expense was $22 million, $33 million, $32 million and $34$16 million in 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, respectively.

Threadneedle Profit Sharing ArrangementsPlan

On an annual basis, Threadneedle employees are eligible for two profit sharing arrangements: (i) a profit sharing plan for all employees based on individual performance criteria, and (ii) an equity participation plan ("EPP") for certain key personnel.

Thisarrangement. The employee profit sharing plan provides for profit sharing of 30% based on an internally defined recurring pretax operating income measure for Threadneedle, which primarily includes pretax income related to investment management services and investment portfolio income excluding gains and losses on asset disposals, certain reorganization expenses, equity participation planEPP and EIP expenses and other non-recurring expenses. Compensation expense related to the employee profit sharing plan was $49$54 million, $84$52 million and $75$32 million in 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006, respectively.

The EPP is a cash award program for certain key personnel who are granted awards based on a formula tied to Threadneedle's financial performance. The EPP provides for 50% vesting after three years and 50% vesting after four years, with required cash-out after five years. All awards are settled in cash, based on a value as determined by an annual independent valuation of Threadneedle's fair market value. The value of the award is recognized as compensation expense evenly over the vesting periods. However, each year's EPP expense is adjusted to reflect Threadneedle's current valuation. Increases or decreases in the value of vested awards are recognized immediately. Increases or decreases in the value of unvested shares are recognized over the remaining vesting periods. Compensation expense related to the EPP was $15 million, $42 million and $48 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,2009, respectively.

20. Derivatives
22. Commitments, Guarantees and Hedging Activities

Derivative instruments enable the Company to manage its exposure to various market risks. The value of such instruments is derived from an underlying variable or multiple variables, including equity, foreign exchange and interest rate indices or prices. The Company does not engage in any derivative instrument trading activities other than as it relates to holdings in consolidated hedge funds. The following table presents a summary of the notional amount and the current fair value of derivative instruments:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
  
 Fair Value  
 Fair Value 
 
 Notional
Amount
 Notional
Amount
 
 
 Asset Liability Asset Liability 
 
 (in millions)
 

Interest rate swaps

 $11,445 $853 $(250)$202 $6 $(3)

Swaptions

  3,200  26    800  1   

Purchased equity options

  17,363  1,535  (79) 7,385  475  (36)

Written equity options

  3,602  22  (274) 1,023    (28)

Total return swaps

  1,749  25  (63) 54  2   

Foreign currency forward contracts

  75    (7) 966  20  (3)

Treasury futures sold(1)

  4      4     

Equity futures purchased(1)

  1      74     

Equity futures sold(1)

  608      241     
              
 

Total(2)

 $38,047 $2,461 $(673)$10,749 $504 $(70)
              
(1)
Treasury and equity futures have no recorded value as they are cash settled daily.Contingencies

(2)
The above table does not include embedded derivatives.

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of the notional amount and fair value of derivative instruments based on the risk they hedge:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
  
 Fair Value  
 Fair Value 
 
 Notional
Amount
 Notional
Amount
 
 
 Asset Liability Asset Liability 
 
 (in millions)
 

Equity indexed annuities

 $213 $3 $ $295 $43 $(1)

Stock market certificates

  1,627  24  (19) 1,868  59  (27)

GMWB and GMAB

  36,076  2,434  (644) 6,721  379  (39)

Foreign currency

        885  20   

Other(1)

  131    (10) 980  3  (3)
              
 

Total

 $38,047 $2,461 $(673)$10,749 $504 $(70)
              
(1)
Other consists primarily of equity and foreign currency instruments used as economic hedges against price and exchange rate risk from seed money investments.

See Note 18 for additional information regarding the Company's fair value measurement of derivative instruments.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company uses interest rate derivative products, primarily swaps and swaptions, to manage funding costs related to the Company's debt and fixed annuity business. The interest rate swaps are used to hedge the exposure to interest rates on the forecasted interest payments associated with debt issuances. As of January 1, 2007 the Company removed the hedge designation from its swaptions used to hedge the risk of increasing interest rates on forecasted fixed premium product sales. The designation was removed due to the hedge relationship no longer being highly effective. Accordingly, all changes in fair value of the swaptions are recorded directly to earnings. Amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be reclassified into earnings as the originally forecasted transactions occur.

The following is a summary of net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) related to cash flow hedging activity, net of tax:

 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses) at January 1

 $(6)$(1)$6 

Holding losses, net of tax of nil, nil and $2, respectively

    (1) (4)

Reclassification of realized gains, net of tax of $1, $2 and $2, respectively

  (2) (4) (3)
        

Net unrealized derivatives losses at December 31

 $(8)$(6)$(1)
        

At December 31, 2008, the Company expects to reclassify $2 million of net pretax gains on derivative instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings during the next 12 months. The $2 million net pretax gain is made up of an $8 million amortization of deferred gain related to interest rate swaps that will be recorded as a reduction to interest expense, partially offset by a $6 million amortization of deferred expense related to interest rate swaptions that will be recorded in net investment income. If a hedge designation is removed or a hedge is terminated prior to maturity, the amount previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) may be recognized into earnings over the period that the hedged item impacts earnings. As discussed above, the Company removed the hedge designation from its swaptions in 2007 and during 2008 and 2006 there were no other hedges that were terminated or the hedge designation removed. For any hedge relationships that are discontinued because the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur according to the original strategy, any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recognized in earnings immediately. No hedge relationships were discontinued during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 due to forecasted transactions no longer expected to occur according to the original hedge strategy.

Currently, the longest period of time over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 26 years and relates to forecasted debt interest payments. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, there were nil, $2 million and $4 million, respectively, in losses on derivative transactions or portions thereof that were ineffective as hedges, excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges.


Table of Contents

Hedges of Net Investment in Foreign OperationsCommitments

The Company designates foreign currency derivatives, primarily forward agreements, as hedges of net investments in certain foreign operations. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the net amount of gains (losses) related to the hedges included in foreign currency translation adjustments was $109 million, $(10) million and $(60) million, respectively, net of tax. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company terminated the hedges of net investment in foreign operations, recording a gain of $142 million reflected in other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2008, the Company did not have derivatives designated as hedges of net investment in foreign operations

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges

The Company holds derivative instruments that either do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. These derivative instruments are used as economic hedges of equity, interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to various products and transactions of the Company.

Certain annuity and investment certificate products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. As a result of fluctuations in equity markets, the amount of expenses incurred by the Company related to equity indexed annuities and stock market certificate products will positively or negatively impact earnings. As a means of economically hedging its obligations under the provisions of these products, the Company writes and purchases index options and occasionally enters into futures contracts. Additionally, certain annuity products contain GMWB or GMAB provisions, which guarantee the right to make limited partial withdrawals each contract year regardless of the volatility inherent in the underlying investments or guarantee a minimum accumulation value of considerations received at the beginning of the contract period, after a specified holding period, respectively. The Company economically hedges the exposure related to GMWB and GMAB provisions using various equity futures, equity options, swaptions and interest rate swaps. The premium associated with certain of these options is paid semi-annually over the life of the option contract. As of December 31, 2008, the remaining payments the Company is scheduled to make for these options, net of amounts receivable on written deferred premium options, were $805 million through July 31, 2023.

The Company enters into financial futures and equity swaps to manage its exposure to price risk arising from seed money investments made in proprietary mutual funds for which the related gains and losses are recorded currently in earnings. The futures contracts generally mature within four months and the related gains and losses are reported currently in earnings.

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge its exposure to certain receivables and obligations denominated in non-functional currencies. The forward contracts generally have maturities ranging from several months up to one year and gains and losses are reported in earnings. As of December 31, 2008 the fair value of the forward contracts was not significant.

Embedded Derivatives

The equity component of the equity indexed annuity and stock market investment certificate product obligations are considered embedded derivatives. Additionally, certain annuities contain GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions, which are also considered embedded derivatives. The fair value of embedded derivatives for annuity related products is included in future policy benefits and claims, whereas the fair value of the stock market investment certificate embedded derivative is included in customer deposits. The changes in fair value of the equity indexed annuity and investment certificate embedded derivatives are reflected in interest credited to fixed accounts and in banking and deposit interest expense, respectively. The changes in fair values of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives are reflected in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the total fair value of these embedded derivatives, excluding the host contract and a liability for life contingent GMWB benefits of $5 million and $2 million, respectively, was a net liability of $1.8 billion and $252 million, respectively.

The Company has also recorded derivative liabilities for the fair value of call features embedded in certain fixed-rate corporate debt investments. These liabilities were nil and $8 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The change in fair values of these calls is reflected in net investment income.

Credit Risk

Credit risk associated with the Company's derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. To mitigate such risk, counterparties are all required to be preapproved. Additionally, the Company may, from time to time, enter into master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements wherever practical. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company accepted collateral consisting primarily of cash and securities of $1.9 billion and $266 million, respectively, from counterparties. In addition, as of December 31, 2008, the Company provided collateral consisting primarily of cash and securities of $434 million and $15 million, respectively, to counterparties. As of


Table of Contents


December 31, 2008, the Company's maximum credit exposure to derivative transactions after considering netting arrangements with counterparties and collateral arrangements was approximately $88 million.

21. Income Taxes

The components of income tax provision (benefit) were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Current income tax:

          
 

Federal

 $50 $137 $84 
 

State and local

  9  (5) 19 
 

Foreign

  17  45  39 
        
  

Total current income tax

  76  177  142 
        

Deferred income tax:

          
 

Federal

  (376) 34  51 
 

State and local

  (22)   (16)
 

Foreign

  (11) (9) (11)
        
  

Total deferred income tax

  (409) 25  24 
        

Total income tax provision (benefit)

 $(333)$202 $166 
        

The geographic sources of pretax income (loss) were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

United States

 $(405)$888 $705 

Foreign

  34  128  92 
        

Total

 $(371)$1,016 $797 
        

The principal reasons that the aggregate income tax provision is different from that computed by using the U.S. statutory rate of 35% were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 

Tax at U.S. statutory rate

  35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %

Changes in taxes resulting from:

          
 

Dividend exclusion

  17.7  (5.2) (5.4)
 

Tax-exempt interest income

  3.7  (1.3) (1.5)
 

Tax credits

  13.7  (6.6) (6.4)
 

State taxes, net of federal benefit

  2.2  (0.3) 0.2 
 

Other, net

  17.4  (1.7) (1.1)
        

Income tax provision

  89.7 % 19.9 % 20.8 %
        

The Company's effective tax rate increased to 89.7% in 2008 from 19.9% in 2007, primarily due to a pretax loss in relation to a net tax benefit for 2008 compared to pretax income for 2007. The Company's effective tax rate for 2008 included $79 million in tax benefits related to changes in the status of current audits and closed audits, tax planning initiatives, and the finalization of prior year tax returns. The Company's effective tax rate for 2007 included a $16 million tax benefit related to the finalization of certain income tax audits and a $19 million tax benefit related to the Company's plan to begin repatriating earnings of certain Threadneedle entities through dividends.


Table of Contents

Accumulated earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries, which totaled $200 million at December 31, 2008, are intended to be permanently reinvested outside the United States. Accordingly, U.S. federal taxes, which would have aggregated $37 million, have not been provided on those earnings.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities measured for GAAP reporting versus income tax return purposes. The significant components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Deferred income tax assets:

       
 

Liabilities for future policy benefits and claims

 $1,744 $1,212 
 

Investment impairments and write-downs

  329  77 
 

Deferred compensation

  210  185 
 

Unearned revenues

  27  29 
 

Net unrealized losses on Available-for-Sale securities

  545  83 
 

Accrued liabilities

  64  64 
 

Investment related

    119 
 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

  222  182 
 

Other

  132  70 
      

Gross deferred income tax assets

  3,273  2,021 
      

Deferred income tax liabilities:

       
 

Deferred acquisition costs

  1,226  1,313 
 

Deferred sales inducement costs

  181  179 
 

Investment related

  616   
 

Depreciation expense

  155  171 
 

Intangible assets

  13  104 
 

Other

  78  134 
      

Gross deferred income tax liabilities

  2,269  1,901 
      

Net deferred income tax assets

 $1,004 $120 
      

The Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of the deferred tax assets that management believes will not be realized. Included in deferred tax assets is a significant deferred tax asset relating to capital losses that have been recognized for financial statement purposes but not yet for tax return purposes. Under current U.S. federal income tax law, capital losses generally must be used against capital gain income within five years of the year in which the capital losses are recognized for tax purposes. Significant judgment is required in determining if a valuation allowance should be established, and the amount of such allowance if required. Factors used in making this determination include estimates relating to the performance of the business including the ability to generate capital gains. Consideration is given to, among other things in making this determination, a) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, b) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, c) taxable income in prior carryback years, and d) tax planning strategies. Based on analysis of the Company's tax position, management believes it is more likely than not that the results of future operations and implementation of tax planning strategies will generate sufficient taxable income to enable the Company to utilize all of its deferred tax assets. Accordingly, no valuation allowance for deferred tax assets has been established as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Included in the Company's deferred income tax assets are net operating loss carryforwards of $57 million which will expire December 31, 2025 and 2026 as well as tax credit carryforwards of $165 million which will expire December 31, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48 the Company recognized a $4 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for 2008 is as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

Balance at January 1

 $164 

Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year

  (164)

Additions for tax positions of prior years

  64 

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

  (120)

Settlements

   
    

Balance at December 31

 $(56)
    

If recognized, approximately $62 million and $84 million, net of federal tax benefits, of the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, would affect the effective tax rate.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision. The Company recognized a net reduction of $25 million in interest and penalties for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company had a $13 million receivable and a $12 million liability for the payment of interest and penalties accrued at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

It is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months. However, there are a number of open audits and quantification of a range cannot be made at this time.

The Company or one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1997. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), as part of the overall examination of the American Express Company consolidated return, completed its field examination of the Company's U.S. income tax returns for 1997 through 2002 during 2008. However, for federal income tax purposes these years continue to remain open as a consequence of certain issues under appeal. The IRS continued its examination of 2003 through 2004 which is expected to be completed during 2009. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the IRS commenced an examination of the Company's U.S. income tax returns for 2005 through 2007. The Company's or certain of its subsidiaries' state income tax returns are currently under examination by various jurisdictions for years ranging from 1998 through 2006.

On September 25, 2007, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2007-61 in which it announced that it intends to issue regulations with respect to certain computational aspects of the Dividends Received Deduction ("DRD") related to separate account assets held in connection with variable contracts of life insurance companies. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended a revenue ruling issued in August 2007 that purported to change accepted industry and IRS interpretations of the statutes governing these computational questions. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other members of the public will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing and substance of any such regulations are unknown at this time, but they may result in the elimination of some or all of the separate account DRD tax benefit that the Company receives. Management believes that it is likely that any such regulations would apply prospectively only.

As a result of the Separation from American Express, the Company's life insurance subsidiaries will not be able to file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return with the other members of the Company's affiliated group until 2010.

The Company's tax allocation agreement with American Express (the "Tax Allocation Agreement"), dated as of September 30, 2005, governs the allocation of consolidated U.S. federal and applicable combined or unitary state and local income tax liabilities between American Express and the Company for tax periods prior to September 30, 2005. In addition, this Tax Allocation Agreement addresses other tax-related matters.

The items comprising other comprehensive loss are presented net of the following income tax provision (benefit) amounts:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net unrealized securities gains (losses)

 $(427)$10 $(30)

Net unrealized derivatives gains (losses)

  (1) (2) (4)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  (4) (1) 4 

Defined benefit plans

  (34) 15   
        

Net income tax provision (benefit)

 $(466)$22 $(30)
        

Table of Contents

22. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is committed to pay aggregate minimum rentals under noncancelable operating leases for office facilities and equipment in future years as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

2009

 $113 

2010

  91 

2011

  83 

2012

  71 

2013

  62 

Thereafter

  302 
    
 

Total

 $722 
    

 
 (in millions)
 
  

2012

 $97 

2013

  88 

2014

  83 

2015

  73 

2016

  61 

Thereafter

  206 
  

Total

 $608 
  

For the years ended December 31, 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 2006,2009, operating lease expense was $92$97 million, $93$103 million and $88$103 million, respectively.

The following table presents the Company's funding commitments:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Commercial mortgage loan commitments

 $44 $101 

Consumer mortgage loan commitments

  298  301 

Consumer lines of credit

  392  91 
      

Total funding commitments

 $734 $493 
      

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Commercial mortgage loan commitments

 $19 $22 

Consumer mortgage loan commitments

  730  525 

Consumer lines of credit

  1,685  1,533 

Affordable housing partnerships

  267  188 
  

Total funding commitments

 $2,701 $2,268 
  

The Company's life and annuity products all have minimum interest rate guarantees in their fixed accounts. As of December 31, 2008,2011, these guarantees range up to 5%. To the extent the yield on the Company's invested asset portfolio declines below its target spread plus the minimum guarantee, the Company's profitability would be negatively affected.

Guarantees

Owing to conditions then-prevailing in the credit markets and the isolated defaults of unaffiliated structured investment vehicles held in the portfolios of money market funds advised by its Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC subsidiary (the "2a-7 Funds"), the Company closely monitored the net asset value of the 2a-7 Funds during 2008 and


Table of Contents

through the date of this report and, as circumstances warranted from time to time, injected capital into one or more of the 2a-7 Funds. The Company has not provided a formal capital support agreement or net asset value guarantee to any of the 2a-7 Funds.

Contingencies

The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in the normal course of business in legal, regulatory and arbitration proceedings, including class actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its activities as a diversified financial services firm. These include proceedings specific to the Company as well as proceedings generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which it operates. The Company can also be subject to litigation arising out of its general business activities, such as its investments, contracts, leases and employment relationships. Uncertain economic conditions, heightened and heightenedsustained volatility in the financial markets such as those which have been experienced for over the past year,and significant financial reform legislation may increase the likelihood that clients and other persons or regulators may present or threaten legal claims or that regulators increase the scope or frequency of examinations of the Company or the financial services industry generally. Relevant to market conditions since the latter part of 2007, a large client claimed breach of certain contractual investment guidelines. Concurrent with the Company continuing to evaluate the client's claims, the parties are discussing the possibility of mediation or arbitration. No date or format has been set for any such proceeding, and the outcome of this matter remains uncertain at this time.

As with other financial services firms, the level of regulatory activity and inquiry concerning the Company's businesses remains elevated. From time to time, the Company receives requests for information from, and/or has been subject to examination or claims by, the SEC, FINRA, OTS,the Federal Reserve Bank, the OCC, the Financial Services Authority, state insurance and securities regulators, state attorneys general and various other domestic or foreign governmental and quasi-governmental authorities on behalf of themselves or clients concerning the Company's business activities and practices, and the practices of the Company's financial advisors. Pending matters about whichDuring recent periods, the Company has recently received information requests, include:exams or inquiries regarding certain matters, including: sales and product or service features of, or disclosures pertaining to, the Company's mutual funds, annuities, equity and fixed income securities, low priced securities, insurance products, brokerage services, financial plans and other advice offerings; trading practices within the Company's asset management business; supervision of the Company's financial advisors; supervisory practices in connection with financial advisors' outside business activities; salescompany procedures and information security. The Company is also responding to regulatory audits, market conduct examinations and other inquiries (including inquiries from the states of Minnesota and New York) relating to an industry-wide investigation of unclaimed property and escheatment practices and supervision associated with the sale of fixed and variable annuities; the delivery of financial plans; the suitability of particular trading strategies and data security.procedures. The number of reviews and investigations has increased in recent years with regard to many firms in the financial services industry, including Ameriprise Financial. The Company has cooperated and will continue to cooperate with the applicable regulators regarding their inquiries.

These legal and regulatory proceedings and disputes are subject to uncertainties and, as such, the Company is unable to estimatepredict the possible lossultimate resolution or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could


Table of Contents


result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief, in addition to further claims, examinations or adverse publicity that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Certain legal and regulatory proceedings are described below.

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and was later transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The plaintiffs alleged that they were investors in several of the Company's mutual funds and they purported to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940.1940 (the '40 Act). The plaintiffs alleged that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services were excessive. Plaintiffs seek an order declaring that defendants have violated the '40 Act and awarding unspecified damages including excessive fees allegedly paid plus interest and other costs. On July 6, 2007, the Courtdistrict court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment, dismissing all claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs appealed the Court'sdistrict court's decision, and the appellate argument took place on April 17, 2008. The8, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's decision, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Company filed with the United States Supreme Court a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case in light of the Supreme Court's anticipated review of a similar excessive fee case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in this case and remanded it to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. Without any further briefing or argument, on June 4, 2010, the Eighth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 8, 2010, the district court re-entered its July 2007 order granting summary judgment in favor of the Company. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit on January 10, 2011. The Eighth Circuit Court heard oral arguments of the parties on November 17, 2011. The Company is now consideringawaiting the appeal.Court's ruling.

In September 2008,November 2010, the Company's J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated subsidiary ("Seligman") received a governmental inquiry regarding an industry insider trading investigation, as previously stated by the Company commenced a lawsuit captioned Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. and Securities America Inc. v. The Reserve Fund et al. in the District Court for the District of Minnesota. The suit alleges that the management of the Reserve Fund made selective disclosures to certain institutional investors in violation of the federal securities laws and in breach of their fiduciary duty in connection with the Reserve Primary Fund's lowering its net asset value ("NAV") to $.97 on September 16, 2008.general media reporting. The Company and its affiliates had invested $228 million of its own assets and $3.4 billion of client assets incontinues to cooperate fully with that inquiry. Neither the Reserve Primary Fund. To date, approximately $0.85 per dollar NAVCompany nor Seligman has been paid to investors by the Reserve Primary Fund.

For several years, the Company has been cooperating with the SEC in connection with an inquiry into the Company's salesaccused of and revenue sharing relating to, other companies' real estate investment trust ("REIT") shares. SEC staff has recently notified the Company that it is considering recommending that the SEC bring a civil action against the Company relating to these issues, and is providing the Company with an opportunity to make a submission to the SEC as to why such an action should not be brought.

23. Guarantees

An unaffiliated third party is providing liquidity to clients of SAI registered representatives that have assets in the Reserve Primary Fund that have been blocked from redemption and frozen by the Reserve Fund since September 16, 2008. Ameriprise Financial has guaranteed the advances this third party has made to the clients of SAI registered representatives up to $15 million through April 15, 2009 or the date on which the $15 million cap is reached. Advances to SAI clients are limited to the lesser of $100,000 or 50% of the value of Reserve Primary Fund holdings, unless SAI management approves a disbursement in excess of 50%. The Company has agreed to indemnify the unaffiliated third party up to $10 million until April 15, 2015, for costs incurred as a result of an arbitration or litigation initiated against the unaffiliated third party by clients of SAI registered representatives. In the event that a client defaults in the repayment of an advance, SAI has recourse to collect from the defaulting client.

During the third quarter of 2008, a property fund limited partnership that the Company consolidates entered into a floating rate revolving credit borrowing, of which $64 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2008. A Threadneedle subsidiary guarantees the repayment of outstanding borrowings up to the value of the assets of the partnership. The debt is secured by the assets of the partnership and there is no recourse to Ameriprise Financial.any


Table of Contents

wrongdoing, and the government has confirmed that neither the Company nor any of its affiliated entities is a target of its investigation into potential insider trading.

In October 2011, a putative class action lawsuit entitled Roger Krueger, et al. vs. Ameriprise Financial, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota against the Company, certain of its present or former employees and directors, as well as certain fiduciary committees on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of the Ameriprise Financial 401(k) Plan. The alleged class period is from October 1, 2005, to the present. The action alleges that Ameriprise breached fiduciary duties under ERISA by selecting and retaining primarily proprietary mutual funds with allegedly poor performance histories, higher expenses relative to other investment options, and improper fees paid to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries. The action also alleges that the Company breached fiduciary duties under ERISA because it used its affiliate Ameriprise Trust Company as the Plan trustee and record-keeper and improperly reaped profits from the sale of the record-keeping business to Wachovia Bank, N.A. Plaintiffs allege over $20 million in damages. On January 17, 2012, all defendants filed a brief and other documents in support of their motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on February 7, 2012. An amended briefing and hearing schedule for the motion to dismiss this amended complaint will be set by the court.

24. Earnings per Common Share
23. Related Party Transactions

The computationsCompany may engage in transactions in the ordinary course of basicbusiness with significant shareholders or their subsidiaries, between the Company and diluted earnings (loss) per common shareits directors and officers or with other companies whose directors or officers may also serve as directors or officers for the Company or its subsidiaries. The Company carries out these transactions on customary terms. The transactions have not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

The Company's executive officers and directors may have transactions with the Company or its subsidiaries involving financial products and insurance services. All obligations arising from these transactions are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
 

Numerator:

          
 

Net income (loss)

 $(38)$814 $631 

Denominator:

          
 

Basic: Weighted-average common shares outstanding

  222.3  236.2  246.5 
 

Effect of potentially dilutive nonqualified stock options and other share-based awards

  2.6  3.7  2.0 
        
 

Diluted: Weighted-average common shares outstanding

  224.9  239.9  248.5 

Earnings (loss) per common share:

          
 

Basic

 $(0.17)$3.45 $2.56 
 

Diluted

 $(0.17(1)$3.39 $2.54 
(1)
Diluted shares used in this calculation represent basic shares duethe ordinary course of the Company's business and are on the same terms in effect for comparable transactions with the general public. Such obligations involve normal risks of collection and do not have features or terms that are unfavorable to the Company's subsidiaries.


24. Discontinued Operations

During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company sold Securities America to Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services, Inc. for $150 million in cash and potential future payments if Securities America reaches certain financial criteria. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations, net loss. The use of actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.

Basic weighted average common sharestax, were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 200731:

 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Total net revenues

 $382 $467 $412 

Loss from discontinued operations

 $(124)$(40)$ 

Gain on sale

  26     

Income tax benefit

  (38) (16) (1)
  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 $(60)$(24)$1 
  

Table of Contents

Assets and 2006 included 2.1 million, 1.6 million and 1.7 million, respectively, of vested, nonforfeitable restricted stock units and 3.1 million, 3.5 million and 3.7 million, respectively, of non-vested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units that are forfeitable but receive nonforfeitable dividends. Potentially dilutive securities include nonqualified stock options and other share-based awards.

25. Shareholders' Equity

The Company has a share repurchase program in place to return excess capital to shareholders. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 the Company repurchased a total of 12.7 million, 15.9 million and 10.7 million shares, respectively, of its common stock at an average price of $48.26, $59.59 and $44.12, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $1.3 billion remaining under a share repurchase authorization. In light of the current market environment, the Company has temporarily suspended its stock repurchase program.

The Company may also reacquire shares of its common stock under its 2005 ICP related to restricted stock awards. Restricted shares that are forfeited before the vesting period has lapsed are recordedliabilities classified as treasury shares. In addition, the holders of restricted shares may elect to surrender a portion of their shares on the vesting date to cover their income tax obligations. These vested restricted shares reacquired by the Company and the Company's payment of the holders' income tax obligations are recorded as a treasury share purchase. The restricted shares forfeited under the 2005 ICP and recorded as treasury shares were 0.3 million shares in each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. For the years ended December 31, 2008 2007 and 2006, the Company reacquired 0.5 million, 0.5 million and 0.4 million shares, respectively, of its common stock through the surrender of restricted shares upon vesting and paid in the aggregate $24 million, $29 million and $20 million, respectively, related to the holders' income tax obligations on the vesting date.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, the Company reissued 1.8 million treasury sharesheld for restricted stock award grants and the issuance of shares vested under the P2 Deferral Plan and the Transition and Opportunity Bonus ("T&O Bonus") program. In 2005, the Company awarded bonuses to advisors under the T&O Bonus program which were converted to 2.0 million share-based awards under the 2005 ICP. The awards had all been issuedsale as of December 31, 2008.2010 were as follows:

 
 (in millions)
 
  

Assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $23 

Receivables

  40 

Other assets

  110 
  

Total assets held for sale

 $173 
  

Liabilities:

    

Long-term debt

 $5 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  26 

Other liabilities

  48 
  

Total liabilities held for sale

 $79 
  

Included in other assets at December 31, 2010, were $48 million of goodwill and $8 million of intangible assets related to Securities America.

26.
25. Segment Information

The Company's five segments are Advice & Wealth Management, Asset Management, Annuities, Protection and Corporate & Other. Each segment records revenues and expenses as if they were each a stand-alone business using the Company's transfer pricing methodology. Transfer pricing uses rates that approximate market-based arm's length prices for specific services provided. The Company reviews the transfer pricing rates periodically and makes appropriate adjustments to ensure the transfer pricing rates that approximate arm's length market prices remain at current market levels. Costs related to shared services are allocated to segments based on their usage of the services provided.


Table of Contents

The largest source of intersegment revenues and expenses is retail distribution services, where segments are charged transfer pricing rates that approximate arm's length market prices for distribution through the Advice & Wealth Management segment. The Advice & Wealth Management segment provides distribution services for proprietaryaffiliated and non-proprietarynon-affiliated products and services. The Asset Management segment provides investment management services for the Company's owned assets and client assets, and accordingly charges investment and advisory management fees to the other segments.

All costs related to shared services are allocated to the segments based on a rate times volume or fixed basis.

The Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planning and advice, as well as full service brokerage and banking services, primarily to retail clients through the Company's financialaffiliated advisors. The Company's affiliated financial advisors utilizehave access to a diversified selection of both proprietaryaffiliated and non-proprietarynon-affiliated products to help clients meet their financial needs. A significant portion of revenues in this segment is fee-based, driven by the level of client assets, which is impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. The Company also earns net investment income on ownedinvested assets primarily from certificate and banking products. This segment earns revenues (distribution fees) for distributing non-proprietarynon-affiliated products and earns intersegment revenues (distribution fees) for distributing the Company's proprietaryaffiliated products and services provided to its retail clients. Intersegment expenses for this segment include expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment.

The Asset Management segment provides investment advice and investment products to retail and institutional clients. RiverSource InvestmentsColumbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("Columbia" or "Columbia Management") predominantly provides U.S. domestic products and services and Threadneedle predominantly provides international investment products and services. U.S. domesticColumbia retail products are primarily distributedprovided through unaffiliated third party financial institutions and through the Advice & Wealth Management segmentsegment. Institutional products and alsoservices are primarily sold through unaffiliated advisors. Internationalthe Company's institutional sales force. Threadneedle retail products are primarily distributedprovided through third parties. Retail products include mutual funds and variable product funds underlying insurance and annuity separate accounts,accounts. Institutional asset management services are designed to meet specific client objectives and may involve a range of products including those that focus on traditional asset classes, separately managed accounts, and collective funds. Asset Management products are also distributed directly to institutions through an institutional sales force. Institutional asset management products include traditional asset classes, separateindividually managed accounts, collateralized loan obligations, hedge funds, collective funds and property funds. Revenues in this segment are primarily earned as fees based on managed asset balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. ThisIn addition to the products and services provided to third party clients, management teams serving our Asset Management segment earnsprovide all intercompany asset management services. The fees for all such services are reflected within the Asset Management segment results through intersegment revenue for investment management services.transfer pricing. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by the Advice & Wealth Management, Annuities and Protection segments.


Table of Contents

The Annuities segment provides variable and fixed annuity products of RiverSource Life companies to retail clients primarily distributed throughclients. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company's variable annuity products were provided through both affiliated financialand unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company discontinued new sales of its variable annuities in non-Ameriprise channels to further strengthen the risk and toreturn characteristics of the retail clients ofbusiness. The Company's fixed annuity products are provided through affiliated advisors as well as unaffiliated advisors through third-party distribution. Revenues for the Company's variable annuity products are primarily earned as fees based on underlying account balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. Revenues for the Company's fixed annuity products are primarily earned as net investment income on invested assets supporting fixed account balances, with profitability significantly impacted by the spread between net investment income earned and interest credited on the fixed account balances. The Company also earns net investment income on ownedinvested assets supporting reserves for immediate annuities and for certain guaranteed benefits offered with variable annuities and on capital supporting the business. Intersegment revenues for this segment reflect fees paid by the Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSource Variable Series Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust I and Wanger Advisors Trust funds under the variable annuity contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by the Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment.

The Protection segment offers a variety of protection products to address the protection and risk management needs of the Company's retail clients including life, disability incomeDI and property-casualty insurance. Life and disability incomeDI products are primarily distributedprovided through the Company's brandedaffiliated advisors. The Company's property-casualty products are soldprovided direct, primarily through affinity relationships. The Company issues insurance policies through its life insurance subsidiaries and the property casualty companies. The primary sources of revenues for this segment are premiums, fees, and charges that the Company receives to assume insurance-related risk. The Company earns net investment income on ownedinvested assets supporting insurance reserves and capital supporting the business. The Company also receives fees based on the level of assets supporting variable universal lifeVUL separate account balances. This segment earns intersegment revenues from fees paid by the Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSource Variable Series Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust, Columbia Funds Variable Insurance Trust I and Wanger Advisors Trust funds under the variable universal lifeVUL contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by the Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment.

The Corporate & Other segment consists of net investment income or loss on corporate level assets, including excess capital held in RiverSource Lifethe Company's subsidiaries and other unallocated equity and other revenues from various investments as well as unallocated corporate expenses. ThisThe Corporate & Other segment also included non-recurring separation costs in 2007includes revenues and 2006 associated with the Company's separation from American Express, the lastexpenses of which was expensed in 2007.


Table of Contentsconsolidated investment entities.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those of the Company, except for the method of capital allocation and the accounting for gains (losses) from intercompany revenues and expenses, which are eliminated in consolidation. The Company evaluates the performance of each segment based on pretax income. The Company allocates certain non-recurring items, such as costs related to supporting RiverSource 2a-7 money market funds, expenses related to unaffiliated money market funds and restructuring charges for 2008, as well as separation costs for 2007 and 2006, to the Corporate segment.

The following is a summary of assets by segment:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $10,624 $8,148 

Asset Management

  5,363  6,662 

Annuities

  58,504  71,557 

Protection

  19,524  20,342 

Corporate & Other

  1,661  2,521 
      

Total assets

 $95,676 $109,230 
      

The following is a summary of segment operating results:

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2008 
 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management
 Asset
Management
 Annuities Protection Corporate
& Other
 Eliminations Consolidated 
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenue from external customers

 $2,413 $1,273 $1,513 $1,955 $(5)$ $7,149 

Intersegment revenue

  886  23  105  43  6  (1,063)  
                

Total revenues

  3,299  1,296  1,618  1,998  1  (1,063) 7,149 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  178  7    1  2  (9) 179 
                

Net revenues

  3,121  1,289  1,618  1,997  (1) (1,054) 6,970 
                

Depreciation and amortization expense

  88  92  705  340  33    1,258 

All other expenses

  3,182  1,120  1,200  1,305  330  (1,054) 6,083 
                

Total expenses

  3,270  1,212  1,905  1,645  363  (1,054) 7,341 
                

Pretax income (loss)

 $(149)$77 $(287)$352 $(364)$  (371)
                 

Income tax benefit

                    (333)
                      

Net loss

                   $(38)
                      
 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Advice & Wealth Management

 $12,293 $11,241 

Asset Management

  6,863  7,854 

Annuities

  87,266  84,836 

Protection

  18,915  18,571 

Corporate & Other

  8,649  8,539 

Assets held for sale

    173 
  

Total assets

 $133,986 $131,214 
  

Table of Contents


The following is a summary of segment results:

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2007 
 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management
 Asset
Management
 Annuities Protection Corporate
& Other
 Eliminations Consolidated 
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenue from external customers

 $2,986 $1,753 $2,101 $1,939 $26 $ $8,805 

Intersegment revenue

  1,057  29  105  47  4  (1,242)  
                

Total revenues

  4,043  1,782  2,206  1,986  30  (1,242) 8,805 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  230  20    1  6  (8) 249 
                

Net revenues

  3,813  1,762  2,206  1,985  24  (1,234) 8,556 
                

Depreciation and amortization expense

  69  90  381  206  34    780 

All other expenses

  3,459  1,365  1,402  1,294  474  (1,234) 6,760 
                

Total expenses

  3,528  1,455  1,783  1,500  508  (1,234) 7,540 
                

Pretax income (loss)

 $285 $307 $423 $485 $(484)$  1,016 
                 

Income tax provision

                    202 
                      

Net income

                   $814 
                      

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2011 
 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management

 Asset
Management

 Annuities
 Protection
 Corporate
& Other

 Eliminations
 Consolidated
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenue from external customers

 $2,825 $2,811 $2,379 $2,035 $189 $ $10,239 

Intersegment revenue

  931  92  252  38  2  (1,315)  
  

Total revenues

  3,756  2,903  2,631  2,073  191  (1,315) 10,239 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  48  3    1  (1) (4) 47 
  

Net revenues

  3,708  2,900  2,631  2,072  192  (1,311) 10,192 
  

Depreciation and amortization expense

  86  83  481  208  29    887 

All other expenses

  3,221  2,381  1,629  1,494  506  (1,311) 7,920 
  

Total expenses

  3,307  2,464  2,110  1,702  535  (1,311) 8,807 
  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision

 $401 $436 $521 $370 $(343)$ $1,385 
  

Income tax provision

                    355 
  

Income from continuing operations

                    1,030 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                    (60)
  

Net income

                    970 

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

                    (106)
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

                   $1,076 
  

 

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2006 
 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management
 Asset
Management
 Annuities Protection Corporate
& Other
 Eliminations Consolidated 
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenue from external customers

 $2,518 $1,745 $2,117 $1,858 $33 $ $8,271 

Intersegment revenue

  1,035  32  85  34  2  (1,188)  
                

Total revenues

  3,553  1,777  2,202  1,892  35  (1,188) 8,271 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  218  26    1  7  (7) 245 
                

Net revenues

  3,335  1,751  2,202  1,891  28  (1,181) 8,026 
                

Depreciation and amortization expense

  60  97  342  138  31    668 

All other expenses

  3,079  1,401  1,396  1,319  547  (1,181) 6,561 
                

Total expenses

  3,139  1,498  1,738  1,457  578  (1,181) 7,229 
                

Pretax income (loss)

 $196 $253 $464 $434 $(550)$  797 
                 

Income tax provision

                    166 
                      

Net income

                   $631 
                      

27. Restructuring Charges

The Company announced a restructuring charge of $60 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 primarily through selective reductions in employee headcount largely in areas other than in the Company's client service operations.

The following table summarizes the Company's restructuring activity for 2008:

 
 (in millions) 

Liability balance at January 1

 $ 

Restructuring charges

  60 

Less amounts paid

  (2)
    

Liability balance at December 31

 $58 
    
 
 Year Ended December 31, 2010 
 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management

 Asset
Management

 Annuities
 Protection
 Corporate
& Other

 Eliminations
 Consolidated
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenue from external customers

 $2,526 $2,294 $2,324 $2,013 $425 $ $9,582 

Intersegment revenue

  884  75  176  35  1  (1,171)  
  

Total revenues

  3,410  2,369  2,500  2,048  426  (1,171) 9,582 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  67  1    1  3  (2) 70 
  

Net revenues

  3,343  2,368  2,500  2,047  423  (1,169) 9,512 
  

Depreciation and amortization expense

  88  105  (75) 189  23    330 

All other expenses

  2,939  1,945  1,927  1,455  451  (1,169) 7,548 
  

Total expenses

  3,027  2,050  1,852  1,644  474  (1,169) 7,878 
  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision

 $316 $318 $648 $403 $(51)$ $1,634 
  

Income tax provision

                    350 
  

Income from continuing operations

                    1,284 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                    (24)
  

Net income

                    1,260 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                    163 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

                   $1,097 
  

Table of Contents

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2009 
 
 Advice &
Wealth
Management

 Asset
Management

 Annuities
 Protection
 Corporate
& Other

 Eliminations
 Consolidated
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenue from external customers

 $2,103 $1,304 $2,165 $1,935 $31 $ $7,538 

Intersegment revenue

  834  44  100  30  2  (1,010)  
  

Total revenues

  2,937  1,348  2,265  1,965  33  (1,010) 7,538 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  133  2    1  7  (2) 141 
  

Net revenues

  2,804  1,346  2,265  1,964  26  (1,008) 7,397 
  

Depreciation and amortization expense

  100  83  54  167  31    435 

All other expenses

  2,737  1,203  1,563  1,300  247  (1,008) 6,042 
  

Total expenses

  2,837  1,286  1,617  1,467  278  (1,008) 6,477 
  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision

 $(33)$60 $648 $497 $(252)$ $920 
  

Income tax provision

                    184 
  

Income from continuing operations

                    736 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

                    1 
  

Net income

                    737 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                    15 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

                   $722 
  

28.
26. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 
 2008 2007 
 
 12/31 9/30 6/30 3/31 12/31 9/30 6/30 3/31 
 
 (in millions, except per share data)
 

Net revenues(1)

 
$

1,350
 
$

1,641
 
$

1,979
 
$

2,000
 
$

2,260
 
$

2,111
 
$

2,153
 
$

2,032
 

Separation costs(2)

          28  60  63  85 

Pretax income (loss)

  (641) (162) 237  195  338  217  245  216 

Net income (loss)

 $(369)$(70)$210 $191 $255 $198 $196 $165 

Earnings (loss) per basic common share

 
$

(1.69

)

$

(0.32

)

$

0.94
 
$

0.84
 
$

1.10
 
$

0.84
 
$

0.83
 
$

0.69
 

Earnings (loss) per diluted common share

 $(1.69)(3)$(0.32)(3)$0.93 $0.82 $1.08 $0.83 $0.81 $0.68 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

                         
 

Basic

  218.5  219.1  223.2  228.4  231.4  235.4  237.4  240.7 
 

Diluted

  220.3  221.7  226.0  231.5  235.4  239.2  241.0  244.1 

Cash dividends paid per common share

 
$

0.17
 
$

0.17
 
$

0.15
 
$

0.15
 
$

0.15
 
$

0.15
 
$

0.15
 
$

0.11
 

Common share price:

                         
 

High

 $39.48 $49.76 $56.17 $57.55 $69.25 $68.00 $67.45 $63.08 
 

Low

 $11.74 $32.03 $40.60 $45.65 $53.23 $51.31 $56.96 $53.01 
(1)
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. See Note 1 for a description of the reclassifications. Revenues as previously reported were $2,086 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and $2,319 million, $2,170 million, $2,138 million and $2,027 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2007, September 30, 2007, June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively.

(2)
The Company incurred separation costs beginning with the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, when the American Express Board of Directors announced the Separation. The Company continued to incur separation costs in subsequent quarterly periods which reflect the completion of the Distribution and the costs incurred by the Company to establish itself as an independent company. As of December 31, 2007, all separation costs have been incurred.

(3)
Diluted shares used in this calculation represent basic shares due to the net loss. Using actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.

Table of Contents

Glossary of Selected Terminology

Administered Assets—Administered assets include assets for which we provide administrative services such as client assets invested in other companies' products that we offer outside of our wrap accounts. These assets include those held in clients' brokerage accounts. We do not exercise management discretion over these assets and do not earn a management fee. These assets are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Auto and Home Insurance—Personal auto and home protection products marketed directly to customers through marketing affiliates such as Costco Wholesale Corporation, Delta Loyalty Management Services, Inc. and Ford Motor Credit Company. We sell these products through our auto and home subsidiary, IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company (doing business as Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance).

Cash Sales—Cash sales are the dollar value volume indicator that captures gross new cash inflows which generate product revenue streams to our company. This includes primarily "client initiated" activity that results in an incremental increase in assets (owned, managed or administered) or premiums inforce (but doesn't need to result in time of sale revenue), or activity that doesn't increase assets or premiums inforce, but generates "fee revenue".

Deferred Acquisition Costs and Amortization—Deferred acquisition costs ("DAC") represent the costs of acquiring new protection, annuity and certain mutual fund business, principally direct sales commissions and other distribution and underwriting costs that have been deferred on the sale of annuity, life, disability income and long term care insurance and, to a lesser extent, deferred marketing and promotion expenses on auto and home insurance and deferred distribution costs on certain mutual fund products. These costs are deferred to the extent they are recoverable from future profits.

Financial Planning—Financial planning at Ameriprise is an ongoing process which is intended to help clients plan to meet their financial goals through disciplined management of their finances. The process involves collaboration between a client and an Ameriprise financial advisor to define the client's goals, develop a plan to achieve the goals, and track progress against the goals, making adjustments where necessary.

Financial Planning Penetration—The period-end number of current clients who have received a financial plan, or have entered into an agreement to receive and have paid for a financial plan, divided by the number of active retail client groups, serviced by branded financial advisors.

Life Insurance Inforce—The total amount of all life insurance death benefits currently insured by our company.

Managed External Client Assets—Managed external client assets include client assets for which we provide investment management services, such as the assets of the RiverSource family of mutual funds, assets of institutional clients and client assets held in wrap accounts (retail accounts for which we receive an advice fee based on assets held in the account). Managed external client assets also include assets managed by sub-advisors selected by us. Managed external client assets are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Managed Owned Assets—Managed owned assets include certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for which we provide investment management services and recognize management fees, such as the assets of the general account and RiverSource Variable Products funds held in the separate accounts of our life insurance subsidiaries.

Net Flows—Sales less redemptions and miscellaneous flows which may include reinvested dividends.

Owned Assets—Owned assets include certain assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for which we do not provide investment management services and do not recognize management fees, such as investments in non-proprietary funds held in the separate accounts of our life insurance subsidiaries, as well as restricted and segregated cash and receivables.

Pretax Income (Loss)—Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit).

Securities America—Securities America Financial Corporation ("SAFC") is a corporation whose sole function is to hold the stock of its operating subsidiaries, Securities America, Inc. ("SAI") and Securities America Advisors, Inc. ("SAA"). SAI is a registered broker-dealer and an insurance agency. SAA is an SEC registered investment advisor.

Separate Accounts—Represent assets and liabilities that are maintained and established primarily for the purpose of funding variable annuity and insurance products. The assets of the separate account are only available to fund the liabilities of the variable entity contractholders and others with contracts requiring premiums or other deposits to the separate account. Clients elect to invest premiums in stock, bond and/or money market funds depending on their risk tolerance. All investment performance, net of fees, is passed through to the client.

Separation Costs—Separation costs include expenses related to our separation from American Express Company. These costs are primarily associated with establishing the Ameriprise Financial brand, separating and reestablishing our technology platforms and advisor and employee retention programs. These costs ended in 2007.


Table of Contents

SOP 05-1 ("Statement of Position 05-1"), "Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts"—SOP 05-1 provides guidance on accounting for DAC associated with any insurance or annuity contract that is significantly modified or internally replaced with another contract.

Third Party Distribution—Distribution of RiverSource products, which include a variety of equity and fixed income mutual funds, annuities and insurance products, to retail clients through unaffiliated financial institutions and broker-dealers. The Third Party channel is separate from the Branded Advisor, Threadneedle, SAFC, and Institutional sales channels.

Threadneedle—Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings Sàrl is a holding company for the Threadneedle group of companies, which provide international investment management products and services.

Wrap Accounts—Wrap accounts enable our clients to purchase other securities such as mutual funds in connection with investment advisory fee-based "wrap account" programs or services. We offer clients the opportunity to select products that include proprietary and non-proprietary funds. We currently offer both discretionary and non-discretionary investment advisory wrap accounts. In a discretionary wrap account, an unaffiliated investment advisor or our investment management subsidiary, RiverSource Investments, LLC, chooses the underlying investments in the portfolio on behalf of the client. In a non-discretionary wrap account, the client chooses the underlying investments in the portfolio based, to the extent the client elects, in part or whole on the recommendations of their financial advisor. Investors in our wrap accounts generally pay an asset-based fee based on the assets held in their wrap accounts. These investors also pay any related fees or costs included in the underlying securities held in that account, such as underlying mutual fund operating expenses and Rule 12b-1 fees.

 
 2011 2010 
 
 12/31
 9/30
 6/30
 3/31
 12/31
 9/30
 6/30
 3/31
 
  
 
 (in millions, except per share data)
 

Net revenues

 $2,582 $2,455 $2,623 $2,532 $2,558 $2,334 $2,462 $2,158 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision

 $352 $247 $399 $387 $368 $446 $462 $358 

Income from continuing operations

 $285 $166 $285 $294 $280 $314 $396 $294 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  13  2  (4) (71) (26) (2) 2  2 
  

Net income

  298  168  281  223  254  312  398  296 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  45  (105) (28) (18) (26) (32) 139  82 
  

Net income attributable to Ameriprise Financial

 $253 $273 $309 $241 $280 $344 $259 $214 
  

Earnings per share attributable to Ameriprise Financial, Inc. common shareholders:

                         

Basic

                         

Income from continuing operations

 $1.04 $1.14 $1.28 $1.24 $1.21 $1.36 $0.98 $0.81 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  0.06  0.01  (0.02) (0.28) (0.10) (0.01) 0.01  0.01 
  

Net income

 $1.10 $1.15 $1.26 $0.96 $1.11 $1.35 $0.99 $0.82 
  

Diluted

                         

Income from continuing operations

 $1.02 $1.12 $1.25 $1.21 $1.18 $1.33 $0.97 $0.80 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  0.06  0.01  (0.02) (0.27) (0.10) (0.01) 0.01  0.01 
  

Net income

 $1.08 $1.13 $1.23 $0.94 $1.08 $1.32 $0.98 $0.81 
  

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

                         

Basic

  230.6  238.0  245.5  251.6  252.7  255.3  261.1  260.8 

Diluted

  234.5  242.0  251.0  257.7  258.9  259.9  265.3  265.0 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $0.51 $0.23 $0.23 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.17 

Common share price:

                         

High

 $50.85 $59.49 $63.78 $65.12 $58.17 $48.80 $49.54 $45.88 

Low

 $36.00 $38.93 $54.72 $57.29 $47.03 $34.68 $35.85 $36.14 
  

Table of Contents


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be reported in the Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in and pursuant to SEC regulations, including controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure. It should be noted that, because of inherent limitations, our company's disclosure controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met.

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level of assurance as of December 31, 2008.2011.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

TheOur management of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.reporting for the Company.

The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company's Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company's management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.2011. In making this assessment, the Company's management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework.Framework.

Based on management's assessment and those criteria, we believe that, as of December 31, 2008,2011, the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Ernst & Young LLP,PricewaterhouseCoopers, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an audit report appearing on the following page on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.2011.


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

We have audited Ameriprise Financial, Inc.'s (the Company's) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2008 consolidated financial statements of Ameriprise Financial, Inc., and our report dated March 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 2, 2009


Table of Contents


Item 9B. Other Information.

None.


PARTPart III.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The following portions of the Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference:

information included under the caption "Items to be Voted on by Shareholders—Shareholders — Item 1—1 — Election of Directors";

information included under the caption "Requirements, Including Deadlines, for Submission of Proxy Proposals, Nomination of Directors and Other Business of Shareholders";

information under the caption "Corporate Governance—Governance — Codes of Conduct";

information included under the caption "Corporate Governance—Governance — Membership on Board Committees";

information under the caption "Corporate Governance—Governance — Nominating and Governance Committee—Committee — Director Nomination Process";

information included under the caption "Corporate Governance—Governance — Audit Committee";

information included under the caption "Corporate Governance—Governance — Audit Committee Financial Experts"; and

information under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance."

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OUR COMPANYExecutive Officers of our Company

Set forth below is a list of our executive officers as of the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been filed with the SEC. None of such officers has any family relationship with any other executive officer or our principal accounting officer, and none of such officers became an officer pursuant to any arrangement or understanding with any other person. Each such officer has been elected to serve until the next annual election of officers or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each officer's age is indicated by the number in parentheses next to his or her name.

James M. Cracchiolo—Cracchiolo — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Cracchiolo (50)(53) has been our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since the Distribution in September 2005. Prior to that time, Mr. Cracchiolo was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AEFCAmerican Express Financial Corporation ("AEFC") since March 2001; President and Chief Executive Officer of AEFC since November 2000; and Group President, Global Financial Services of American Express since June 2000. He served as Chairman of American Express Bank Ltd. from September 2000 until April 2005 and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Travel Related Services International from May 1998 through July 2003. He is also currently on the board of advisors of the March of Dimes.Dimes and previously had served on the board of Tech Data Corporation.

Joseph E. Sweeney—President—Sweeney — President — Advice & Wealth Management, Products and Services

Mr. Sweeney (50) has been our President — Advice & Wealth Management, Products and Services since May 2009. Prior to that time, Mr. Sweeney served as President — Financial Planning, Products and Services

Mr. Sweeney (47) has been our President—Financial Planning, Products and Services since September 2005.Services. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Sweeney served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Banking, Brokerage and Managed Products of AEFC since April 2002. Prior thereto, he served as Senior Vice President and Head, Business Transformation, Global Financial Services of American Express from March 2001 until April 2002. Mr. Sweeney is currently on the board of directors of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

William F. Truscott—President—Truscott — CEO — U.S. Asset Management and President, Annuities

Mr. Truscott (51) has been our CEO — U.S. Asset Management and President, Annuities since May 2010. Prior to that time, Mr. Truscott had served as our President — U.S. Asset Management, Annuities and Chief Investment Officer

Mr. Truscott (48) has been since February 2008 and as our President—President — U.S. Asset Management and Chief Investment Officer since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Truscott served as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of AEFC, a position he held since he joined the company in September 2001.


Table of Contents

Walter S. Berman—Berman — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Berman (66)(69) has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Berman served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AEFC, a position he held since January 2003. From April 2001 to January 2004, Mr. Berman served as Corporate Treasurer of American Express.


Table of Contents

Kelli A. Hunter—Hunter — Executive Vice President of Human Resources

Ms. Hunter (47)(50) has been our Executive Vice President of Human Resources since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Ms. Hunter served as Executive Vice President of Human Resources of AEFC since joining our company in June 2005. Prior to joining AEFC, Ms. Hunter was Senior Vice President—President — Global Human Capital for Crown Castle International Corporation in Houston, Texas. Prior to that, she held a variety of senior level positions in human resources for Software Spectrum, Inc., Mary Kay, Inc., as well as Morgan Stanley Inc. and Bankers Trust New York Corporation.

John C. Junek—Junek — Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Mr. Junek (59)(62) has been our Executive Vice President and General Counsel since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Junek served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of AEFC since June 2000.

Glen Salow—Salow — Executive Vice President—President — Service Delivery and Technology

Mr. Salow (52)(55) has been our Executive Vice President—President — Service Delivery and Technology since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Salow was Executive Vice President of Technologies and Operations of AEFC since May 2005 and was Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of American Express from March 2000 to May 2005.

Kim M. Sharan—Sharan — President — Financial Planning and Wealth Strategies, Chief Marketing Officer

Ms. Sharan (54) has been our President — Financial Planning and Wealth Strategies, Chief Marketing Officer since June 2009. Prior to that time, Ms. Sharan served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer

Ms. Sharan (51) has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer since September 2005.Officer. Prior to the Distribution,that, Ms. Sharan served as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of AEFC since July 2004. Prior thereto, she served as Senior Vice President and Head of Strategic Planning of the Global Financial Services Division of American Express from October 2002 until July 2004. Prior to joining American Express, Ms. Sharan was Managing Director at Merrill Lynch in Tokyo, Japan, from February 2000 until September 2002.

Deirdre N. Davey—SeniorDavey McGraw — Executive Vice President—President — Corporate Communications and Community Relations

Ms. Davey (38)McGraw (41) has been our SeniorExecutive Vice President—President — Corporate Communications and Community Relations since February 2007.2010. Previously, Ms. Davey McGraw served as Senior Vice President—President — Corporate Communications and Community Relations since February 2007 and as Vice President — Corporate Communications since May 2006. Prior thereto, Ms. Davey McGraw served as Vice President—President — Business Planning and Communications for our Chairman's Office, and prior to the Distribution,that, she served as Vice President—President — Business Planning and Communications for the Group President, Global Financial Services at American Express. Ms. Davey has more than 15 years of experience in marketing, business planning and corporate communications.

John R. Woerner—President—Woerner — President — Insurance and Chief Strategy Officer

Mr. Woerner (40)(43) has been our President—President — Insurance and Chief Strategy Officer since February 2008. Prior to his current role, he was Senior Vice President—President — Strategy and Business Development since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Woerner served as Senior Vice President—President — Strategic Planning and Business Development of AEFC since March 2005. Prior to joining us,AEFC, Mr. Woerner was a Principal at McKinsey & Co., where he spent approximately ten years serving leading U.S. and European financial services firms, and co-led McKinsey's U.S. Asset Management Practice.

Donald E. Froude—President—Froude — President — The Personal Advisors Group

Mr. Froude (53)(56) has been our President—President — The Personal Advisors Group since September 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Froude served as managing director and head of U.S. distribution for Legg Mason, Inc. since 2006. Prior to that, he served as President of Intermediary Distribution for Columbia Management, a division of Bank of America, from 2004 to 2006. Prior thereto, he was president and chief executive officer of Quick & Reilly.


Table of Contents

David K. Stewart—Stewart — Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Mr. Stewart (55)(58) has been our Senior Vice President and Controller since September 2005. Prior to the Distribution,that, Mr. Stewart served as Vice President and Controller of AEFC and its subsidiaries since June 2002, when he joined American Express. Prior thereto, Mr. Stewart held various management and officer positions in accounting, financial reporting and treasury operations at Lutheran Brotherhood, now known as Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, where he was Vice President—President — Treasurer from 1997 until 2001.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance

We have adopted a set of Corporate Governance Principles and Categorical Standards of Director Independence which, together with the charters of the three standing committees of the Board of Directors (Audit; Compensation and Benefits; and Nominating and Governance) and our Code of Conduct (which constitutes the company'sCompany's code of ethics), provide the framework for the governance of our company. A complete copy of our Corporate Governance Principles and Categorical Standards of Director Independence, the charters of each of the Board committees, the Code of Conduct (which applies


Table of Contents

not only to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, but also to all other employees of our company) and the Code of Business Conduct for the Members of the Board of Directors may be found by clicking the "Corporate Governance" link found on our Investor Relations website at ir.ameriprise.com. You may also access our Investor Relations website through our main website at ameriprise.com by clicking on the "Investor Relations" link, which is located at the bottom of the page. (Information from such sites is not incorporated by reference into this report.) You may also obtain free copies of these materials by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.


Table of Contents


Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The following portions of the Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference:

information under the caption "Corporate Governance—Governance — Compensation and Benefits Committee—Committee — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation";

information included under the caption "Compensation of Executive Officers"; and

information included under the caption "Compensation of Directors."


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 
 
   
 
 Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected
in column (a)) — shares

 
  

Plan category

          

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  19,328,115(1)$39.22  8,959,697 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  6,744,057(2) 32.60  6,259,603(3)
  

Total

  26,072,172 $38.85  15,219,300 
  
(1)
Includes 1,504,579 share units subject to vesting per the terms of the applicable plan which could result in the issuance of common stock. As the terms of these share based awards do not provide for an exercise price, they have been excluded from the weighted average exercise price in column B.

(2)
Includes 5,710,093 share units subject to vesting per the terms of the applicable plans which could result in the issuance of common stock. As the terms of these share based awards do not provide for an exercise price, they have been excluded from the weighted average exercise price in column B. For additional information on the Company's equity compensation plans see Note 16 — Share-Based Compensation to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The non-shareholder approved plans consist of the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan and the Amended Franchise Advisor Deferred Equity Program.

(3)
Consists of 2,959,218 shares of common stock issuable under the terms of the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan, 2,641,960 shares of common stock issuable under the Ameriprise Advisor Group Deferred Compensation Plan, and 658,425 shares of common stock issuable under the Amended Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan.

Descriptions of our equity compensation plans can be found in Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information concerning the market for our common shares and our shareholders and certain information concerning equity compensation plans, can be found in Part II, Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Price and dividend information concerning our common shares may be found in Note 2826 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information set forth under the heading "Performance Graph" contained on page 19 of our 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. The information included under the caption "Ownership of Our Common Shares" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Table of Contents


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information under the captions "Corporate Governance—Governance — Director Independence," "Corporate Governance—Governance — Categorical Standards of Director Independence," "Corporate Governance—Governance — Independence of Committee Members" and "Certain Transactions" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information set forth under the heading "Items to be Voted on by Shareholders—Shareholders — Item 2—3 — Ratification of Audit Committee's Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants—Accountants for 2012 — Independent Registered Public Accountant Fees"; "—" — Services to Associated Organizations"; and "—Policy" —Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accountants," in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


PARTPart IV.

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)
1.    Financial Statements:

Table of Contents


SIGNATURESSignatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.

(Registrant)

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ WALTERWalter S. BERMANBerman

Walter S. Berman
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


POWER OF ATTORNEYPower of Attorney

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors and officers of Ameriprise Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby make, constitute and appoint James M. Cracchiolo, Walter S. Berman and John C. Junek, and each of them, the undersigned's true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned's name as such director and/or officer of said corporation to an Annual Report on Form 10-K or other applicable form, and all amendments thereto, to be filed by such corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with all exhibits thereto and other supporting documents, with said Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and any of them, full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and execution of the powers herein expressly granted.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012 By /s/ JAMESJames M. CRACCHIOLOCracchiolo

James M. Cracchiolo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
(Principal Executive Officer and Director)

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ WALTERWalter S. BERMANBerman

Walter S. Berman
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ DAVIDDavid K. STEWARTStewart

David K. Stewart
Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ IRA D. HALLLon R. Greenberg

Ira D. HallLon R. Greenberg
Director

Table of Contents


Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ WARRENWarren D. KNOWLTONKnowlton

Warren D. Knowlton
Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ W. WALKER LEWISWalker Lewis

W. Walker Lewis
Director

Table of Contents

Date: March 2, 2009By/s/ SIRI S. MARSHALL

Siri S. Marshall
Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ JEFFREY NODDLESiri S. Marshall

Jeffrey NoddleSiri S. Marshall
Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ RICHARD F. POWERS IIIJeffrey Noddle

Richard F. Powers IIIJeffrey Noddle
Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ H. JAY SARLESJay Sarles

H. Jay Sarles
Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ ROBERTRobert F. SHARPE, JR.Sharpe, Jr.

Robert F. Sharpe, Jr.
Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 24, 2012

 

By

 

/s/ WILLIAMWilliam H. TURNERTurner

William H. Turner
Director

Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.:

Our audit of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated February 24, 2012 appearing in this Annual Report to Shareholders of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 2012


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statementsbalance sheet of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20082010, and 2007,the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2008,2010, and have issued our report thereon dated March 2, 2009 (incorporated by referenceFebruary 28, 2011, except for Note 24 (Discontinued Operations), as to which the date is February 24, 2012 (included elsewhere in this Form 10-K)Registration Statement). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010 listed in Item 15(a) of Form 10-K.this Annual Report (Form 10-K). This schedule is the responsibility of the company'sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statement schedule, certain 2010 and 2009 amounts have been retrospectively adjusted to reclassify the assets, liabilities and results of operations of a certain subsidiary as discontinued operations.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
MarchFebruary 28, 2011, except for Note 2 2009(Discontinued Operations), as to which the date is February 24, 2012


Table of Contents


Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
(Parent Company Only)


Table of Contents

Condensed Statements of Operations

 F-3F-4

Condensed Balance Sheets

 
F-4F-5

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 
F-5F-6

Notes to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

 
F-6F-7

Table of Contents



AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Parent Company Only)

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

          
 

Management and financial advice fees

 $70 $85 $65 
 

Distribution fees

      70 
 

Net investment income

  21  27  59 
 

Other revenues

  62  9  9 
        
  

Total revenues

  153  121  203 

Banking and deposit interest expense

  2  6  7 
        
  

Total net revenues

  151  115  196 
        

Expenses

          
 

Interest and debt expense

  108  112  101 
 

Separation costs

    75  143 
 

General and administrative expense

  323  262  413 
        
  

Total expenses

  431  449  657 
        

Pretax loss before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (280) (334) (461)

Income tax benefit

  (154) (142) (179)
        

Loss before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (126) (192) (282)

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  66  1,006  913 
        

Net income (loss)

 $(60)$814 $631 
        

See Notes toSchedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant.

Registrant

TableCondensed Statements of Contents

Operations


AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Parent Company Only)

 
 December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions, except share data)
 

Assets

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $734 $1,302 

Investments

  69  346 

Receivables

  32  40 

Due from subsidiaries

  623  245 

Land, buildings, equipment, and software, net of accumulated depreciation of $580 and $487, respectively

  522  577 

Investment in subsidiaries

  6,601  7,906 

Other assets

  352  281 
      
  

Total assets

 $8,933 $10,697 
      

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

       

Liabilities:

       

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 $164 $217 

Due to subsidiaries

  179  252 

Debt

  1,957  2,000 

Other liabilities

  477  418 
      
  

Total liabilities

  2,777  2,887 
      

Shareholders' Equity:

       

Common shares ($.01 par value; shares authorized, 1,250,000,000; shares issued, 256,432,623 and 255,925,436, respectively)

  3  3 

Additional paid-in capital

  4,688  4,630 

Retained earnings

  4,570  4,811 

Treasury shares, at cost (39,921,924 and 28,177,593 shares, respectively)

  (2,012) (1,467)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, including amounts applicable to equity investments in subsidiaries:

       
 

Net unrealized securities losses

  (961) (168)
 

Net unrealized derivatives losses

  (8) (6)
 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  (85) (19)
 

Defined benefit plans

  (39) 26 
      

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (1,093) (167)
      

Total shareholders' equity

  6,156  7,810 
      

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $8,933 $10,697 
      

See Notes to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant.


Table of Contents


AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Parent Company Only)

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (in millions)
 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

          

Net income (loss)

 $(60)$814 $631 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

          
 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (66) (1,006) (913)
 

Dividends received from subsidiaries

  1,139  1,558  670 
 

Other operating activities, primarily with subsidiaries

  237  (75) 124 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  1,250  1,291  512 
        

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

          

Available-for-Sale securities:

          
 

Proceeds from sales

      23 
 

Maturities, sinking fund payments and calls

  161  104  401 
 

Purchases

  (161) (91) (347)

Proceeds from sales of other investments

  9     

Purchases of other investments

  (103)    

Purchase of land, buildings, equipment and software

  (24) (92) (153)

Contributions to subsidiaries

  (638) (40) (220)

Acquisitions

  (316)   (33)

Change in loans

  4  6  2 

Other, net

  37     
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (1,031) (113) (327)
        

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

          

Proceeds from issuances of debt, net of issuance costs

      494 

Principal repayments of debt

  (43)   (50)

Dividends paid to shareholders

  (143) (133) (108)

Repurchase of common shares

  (638) (989) (478)

Exercise of stock options

  9  37  20 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

  29  37  52 

Other, net

  (1) 53   
        

Net cash used in financing activities

  (787) (995) (70)
        

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  
(568

)
 
183
  
115
 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  1,302  1,119  1,004 
        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $734 $1,302 $1,119 
        

Supplemental Disclosures:

          

Interest paid on debt

 $121 $121 $95 

Income taxes paid (received), net

  (21) 6  118 
 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues

          

Management and financial advice fees

 $ $129 $53 

Distribution fees

  9  11   

Net investment income

  18  17  22 

Other revenues

  30  29  68 
  

Total revenues

  57  186  143 

Banking and deposit interest expense

    1  1 
  

Total net revenues

  57  185  142 
  

Expenses

          

Distribution expenses

 $5 $(9)$ 

Interest and debt expense

  95  107  127 

General and administrative expense

  223  288  271 
  

Total expenses

  323  386  398 
  

Pretax loss before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (266) (201) (256)

Income tax benefit

  (102) (120) (114)
  

Loss before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (164) (81) (142)

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries excluding discontinued operations

  1,300  1,202  863 
  

Net income from continuing operations

  1,136  1,121  721 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (60) (24) 1 
  

Net income

 $1,076 $1,097 $722 
  

See Notes to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant.


Table of Contents


AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC.Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANTCondensed Balance Sheets
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT (Parent
(Parent Company Only)

 
 December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 
  
 
 (in millions, except share data)
 

Assets

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $712 $1,316 

Investments

  846  49 

Loans to subsidiaries

  624  564 

Due from subsidiaries

  122  109 

Receivables

  46  50 

Land, buildings, equipment, and software, net of accumulated depreciation of $707 and $676, respectively

  263  272 

Investments in subsidiaries from continuing operations

  9,332  9,819 

Investments in subsidiaries held for sale

    94 

Other assets

  1,357  1,159 
  

Total assets

 $13,302 $13,432 
  

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

       

Liabilities:

       

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 $167 $178 

Due to subsidiaries

  261  354 

Debt

  2,393  2,311 

Other liabilities

  654  422 
  

Total liabilities

  3,475  3,265 
  

Shareholders' Equity:

       

Common shares ($.01 par value; shares authorized, 1,250,000,000; shares issued, 303,757,574 and 301,366,044, respectively)

  3  3 

Additional paid-in capital

  6,237  6,029 

Retained earnings

  6,983  6,190 

Treasury shares, at cost (81,814,591 and 54,668,152 shares, respectively)

  (4,034) (2,620)

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, including amounts applicable to equity investments in subsidiaries

  638  565 
  

Total shareholders' equity

  9,827  10,167 
  

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $13,302 $13,432 
  

See Notes to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant.


Table of Contents


Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Parent Company Only)

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2011
 2010
 2009
 
  
 
 (in millions)
 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

          

Net income

 $1,076 $1,097 $722 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries excluding discontinued operations

  (1,300) (1,202) (863)

Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  60  24  (1)

Dividends received from subsidiaries

  1,210  796  204 

Other operating activities, primarily with subsidiaries

  (231) 921  (90)
  

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  815  1,636  (28)
  

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

          

Available-for-Sale securities:

          

Proceeds from sales

    31  29 

Maturities, sinking fund payments and calls

  239  151  86 

Purchases

  (22) (151) (139)

Purchase of other investments

    (32)  

Purchase of land, buildings, equipment and software

  (56) (32) (29)

Contributions to subsidiaries

  (128) (73) (233)

Return of capital from subsidiaries

  22  116  60 

Acquisitions

    (866)  

Proceeds from sale of business

  150     

Repayment of loans from subsidiaries

  1,252  1,282  1,400 

Issuance of loans to subsidiaries

  (1,312) (1,463) (1,599)

Other, net

  2  34  8 
  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  147  (1,003) (417)
  

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

          

Repayments of debt

 $(14)$(354)$(550)

Dividends paid to shareholders

  (212) (183) (164)

Repurchase of common shares

  (1,495) (582) (11)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

      869 

Issuances of debt, net of issuance costs

    744  491 

Exercise of stock options

  66  113  6 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

  90  9  12 

Other, net

  (1) (2) (4)
  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (1,566) (255) 649 
  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  
(604

)
 
378
  
204
 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  1,316  938  734 
  

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $712 $1,316 $938 
  

Supplemental Disclosures:

          

Interest paid on debt

 $139 $140 $122 

Income taxes paid, net

  334  2  4 

Non-cash capital transactions to (from) subsidiaries

  (850) 14  331 

Non-cash financing activity:

          

Dividends declared but not paid

  62     
  

See Notes to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant.


Table of Contents


Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Notes to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

(Parent Company Only)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Condensed Financial Statements include the accounts of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant," "Ameriprise Financial" or "Parent Company") and, on an equity basis, its subsidiaries and affiliates. The appropriated retained earnings of consolidated investment entities are not included on the Parent Company Only Condensed Financial Statements. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and all adjustments made were of a normal, recurring nature.GAAP. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. The financial information of the Parent Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes of Ameriprise Financial. Parent Company revenues and expenses, other than compensation and benefits and debt and interest expense, are primarily related to intercompany transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified

The change in the fair value of certain derivative instruments is reflected on the Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Operations. For certain of these derivatives, the change in the hedged item is reflected on the subsidiaries' Statements of Operations. The change in fair value of derivatives used to conformhedge certain asset-based distribution fees is included in distribution fees, while the underlying distribution fee revenue is reflected in equity in earnings of subsidiaries. The change in fair value of derivatives used to the current year's presentation.

Ameriprise Financial was formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express Company ("American Express"). On February 1, 2005, the American Express Board of Directors announced its intentioneconomically hedge exposure to pursue the disposition of 100% of its shareholdings in Ameriprise Financial (the "Separation") through a tax-free distribution to American Express shareholders. Effective as of the close of business on September 30, 2005, American Express completed the separationequity price risk of Ameriprise Financial, and the distributionInc. common stock granted as part of the Ameriprise Financial common shares to American Express shareholders.Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan is included in distribution expenses, while the underlying distribution expenses are reflected in equity in earnings of subsidiaries.


2. Discontinued Operations

In the fourth quarter of 2011, Ameriprise Financial incurred significant non-recurring separation costssold Securities America for $150 million. The results of Securities America have been presented as equity in 2007income (loss) of discontinued operations for all periods presented and 2006the related investment in subsidiary has been classified as a resultheld for sale as of the Separation. The separation from American Express was completed in 2007.

In 2008, the Parent Company contributed leveraged loans of $83 million to RiverSource Life. The Parent Company recorded an investment loss of $22 million within net investment income related to the transfer of these leveraged loans, which was eliminated in consolidation.December 31, 2010.

2.
3. Debt

All of the consolidated debt of Ameriprise Financial areis borrowings of the Parent Company, except as indicated below.

At December 31, 2008,2010, the consolidated debt of Ameriprise Financial included $64 million of floating rate revolving credit borrowings related to certain consolidated property funds. The debt is due in 2013 and will be extinguished with the cash flows from the sale of the investments held within the partnerships.

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the consolidated debt of Ameriprise Financial included $6 million and $18 million, respectively, of municipal bond inverse floater certificates that are non-recourse debt obligations supported by a $10 million portfolio of a consolidated structured entity.municipal bonds. The certificates were extinguished in 2011, funded through the call of the portfolio of municipal bonds.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the debt of Ameriprise Financial included $504 million and $397 million of repurchase agreements, respectively, which are accounted for as secured borrowings.

3.
4. Guarantees, Commitments and Contingencies

The Parent Company is the guarantor for an operating leaseleases of IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company.Company and certain other subsidiaries.

All consolidated legal, regulatory and arbitration proceedings, including class actions of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are potential or current obligations of the Parent Company.

The Parent Company and ACCAmeriprise Certificate Company ("ACC") entered into a Capital Support Agreement on March 2, 2009, pursuant to which the Parent Company agrees to commit such capital to ACC as is necessary to satisfy applicable minimum capital requirements, up to a maximum commitment of $115 million.

4. Guarantees

An unaffiliated third party is providing liquidity to clients of Securities America, Inc. ("SAI") registered representatives that have assets in For the Reserve Primary Fund that have been blocked from redemption and frozen by the Reserve Fund since September 16, 2008. Ameriprise Financial has guaranteed the advances this third party has made to the clients of SAI registered representatives up to $15 million through April 15, 2009 or the date on which the $15 million cap is reached. Advances to SAI clients are limited to the lesser of $100,000 or 50% of the value of Reserve Primary Fund holdings, unless SAI management approves a disbursement in excess of 50%. The Parent Company has agreed to indemnify the unaffiliated third party up to $10 million until April 15, 2015, for costs incurred as a result of an arbitration or litigation initiated against the unaffiliated third party by clients of SAI registered representatives. In the event that a client defaults in the repayment of an advance, SAI has recourse to collect from the defaulting client.

During the third quarter of 2008, a consolidated property fund limited partnership entered into a floating rate revolving credit borrowing, of which $64 million was outstanding as ofyears ended December 31, 2008. A subsidiary of Threadneedle Asset Management Holdings Sàrl guarantees2011, 2010 and 2009, ACC did not draw upon the repayment of outstanding borrowings up to the value of the assets of the partnership. The debt is secured by the assets of the partnershipCapital Support Agreement and there is no recourse to Ameriprise Financial.had met all applicable capital requirements.


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEXExhibit Index

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have filed certain agreements as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other party or parties to such agreements and (i) may have been qualified by disclosures made to such other party or parties, (ii) were made only as of the date of such agreements or such other date(s) as may be specified in such agreements and are subject to more recent developments, which may not be fully reflected in our public disclosure, (iii) may reflect the allocation of risk among the parties to such agreements and (iv) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors. Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe our actual state of affairs at the date hereof and should not be relied upon.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The exhibit numbers followed by an asterisk (*) indicate exhibits electronically filed herewith. All other exhibit numbers indicate exhibits previously filed and are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Exhibits numbered 10.2 through 10.1710.22 are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

Exhibit
 Description
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 4, 2005)April 30, 2010).

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ameriprise Financial, Inc., as amended on November 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 ofto the AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K, file8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on February 27, 2007)April 30, 2010).

4.1

 

Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 3 to Form 10 Registration Statement, File No. 1-32525, filed on August 19, 2005).

4.2

 

Indenture dated as of October 5, 2005, between Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-128834, filed on October 5, 2005).

4.3


Indenture dated as of May 5, 2006, between Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.A to the Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR, File No. 333-133860, filed on May 5, 2006).

4.4

 

Junior Subordinated Debt Indenture, dated as of May 5, 2006, between Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.C to the Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR, File No. 333-133860, filed on May 5, 2006).

 

 

Other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the registrant are omitted pursuant to Section (b)(4)(iii)(A) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The registrant agrees to furnish copies of these instruments to the SEC upon request.

10.1

 

Tax Allocation Agreement by and between American Express and Ameriprise Financial, Inc., dated as of September 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 4, 2005).

10.2

 

Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective April 25, 200728, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit AB to the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25, 2007,28, 2010, File No. 001-32525, filed on March 9, 2007)19, 2010).

10.3*

 

Ameriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009.2012.

10.4*10.4

 

Ameriprise Financial Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective JanuaryApril 1, 2009.2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 1-32525, filed on May 4, 2010).

10.5

 

Form of Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan Master Agreement for Substitution Awards (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 Registration Statement, File No. 1-32525, filed on August 15, 2005).

10.6

 

Ameriprise Financial Form of Award Certificate—Certificate — Non-Qualified Stock Option Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 4, 2005).

10.7

 

Ameriprise Financial Form of Award Certificate—Certificate — Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 4, 2005).

10.8

 

Ameriprise Financial Form of Award Certificate—Certificate — Restricted Stock Unit Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 4, 2005).

Table of Contents


10.9


Exhibit
Description
10.9Ameriprise Financial Form of Agreement—Agreement — Cash Incentive Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 4, 2005).

10.10

 

Ameriprise Financial Long-Term Incentive Award Program Guide (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on February 29, 2008)March 2, 2009).

10.11*10.11


Ameriprise Financial Performance Cash Unit Plan Supplement to the Long Term Incentive Award Program Guide (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 1-32525, filed on May 2, 2011).

10.12


Ameriprise Financial Form of Award Certificate — Performance Cash Unit Plan Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 1-32525, filed on May 2, 2011).

10.13


Ameriprise Financial Performance Share Unit Plan Supplement to the Long-Term Incentive Award Program Guide (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 1-32525, filed on May 2, 2011).

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Description
10.14Ameriprise Financial Form of Award Certificate — Performance Share Unit Plan Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 1-32525, filed on May 2, 2011).

10.15*

 

Ameriprise Financial Deferred Share Plan for Outside Directors, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009.2012.

10.1210.16

 

CEO Security and Compensation Arrangements (incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on October 31, 2005).

10.13*10.17*

 

Ameriprise Financial Senior Executive Severance Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009.2012.

10.1410.18

 

Restricted Stock Awards in lieu of Key Executive Life Insurance Program (incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on November 18, 2005).

10.1510.19

 

Ameriprise Financial Annual Incentive Award Plan, adopted effective as of September 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 1-32525. filed on March 8, 2006).

10.1610.20

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Principal Accounting Officer and any other officers designated by the Chief Executive Officer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on March 8, 2006).

10.1710.21

 

Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-156075, filed on December 11, 2008).

10.1810.22

 

Credit Agreement, datedAmeriprise Advisor Group Deferred Compensation Plan, as of September 30, 2005, among Ameriprise Financial, Inc., the lenders listed therein, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wachovia Bank, National Associationamended and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.restated effective January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3110.18 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on March 8, 2006)February 24, 2010).

10.19*10.23


Credit Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2011, among Ameriprise Financial, Inc., the lenders party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on November 23, 2011).

10.24

 

Capital Support Agreement by and between Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and Ameriprise Certificate Company, dated as of March 2, 2009.2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 1-32525, filed on March 2, 2009).

12*

 

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

13*

 

Portions of the Ameriprise Financial, Inc. 20082011 Annual Report to Shareholders, which, except for those sections incorporated herein by reference, are furnished solely for the information of the SEC and are not to be deemed "filed."

21*

 

Subsidiaries of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

23*23.1*


Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

23.2*

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

24

 

Powers of attorney (included on Signature Page).

31.1*

 

Certification of James M. Cracchiolo pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*

 

Certification of Walter S. Berman pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32*

 

Certification of James M. Cracchiolo and Walter S. Berman pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101*


The following materials from Ameriprise Financial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.