Table of ContentsUNITED STATES

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K



ýxANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: January 29, 2011

OR


For the fiscal year ended: January 31, 2009

or

o¨


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-51300

ZUMIEZ INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington
91-1040022
(State or other jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) 91-1040022
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

6300 Merrill Creek Parkway, Suite B,
Everett, Washington
98203
(Address of principal executive offices)
 

98203
(Zip Code)

Registrant's(425) 551-1500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(425) 551-1500code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:Common Stock

Name of each exchange on which registered:The NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  o¨    No  ýx

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  o¨    No  ýx

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last ninety days.    Yes  ýx    No  o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant'sRegistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.10–K.    o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"” “accelerated filer” and "smaller“smaller reporting company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filero Accelerated filerý¨  Non-acceleratedAccelerated filero
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 x
Non-accelerated filer¨  Smaller reporting companyo¨

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o¨ No ýx

As of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter, August 2, 2008,July 30, 2010, the aggregate market value of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $292,158,083$386,823,680 using the closing sales price on that day of $14.90.$18.30.

         As ofAt March 23, 2009,15, 2011, there were 29,933,90530,989,173 shares outstanding of the Registrant's common stock outstanding.


stock.

Table of Contents


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required by Part III of this report is incorporated by reference from the Registrant'sRegistrant’s definitive proxy statement, relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held May 27, 2009,25, 2011, which definitive proxy statement will be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.



ZUMIEZ INC.

FORM 10-K

PART I.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

 

Item 1.

Business

1

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

10

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

22

Item 2.

Properties

22

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

23

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

23

PART II

Item 5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

24

Item 6.

Selected Financial Information

26

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

28

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

40

Item 8.

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

40

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

41

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

41

Item 9B.

Other Information

41

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

42

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

42

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

42

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

42

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

42

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statements

42

Signatures

44

Exhibit 21.1

Exhibit 23.1

Exhibit 31.1

Exhibit 31.2

Exhibit 32.1


ZUMIEZ INC.

FORM 10-K

PART I.

This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our expectations for future events and future financial performance. Generally, the words "anticipate," "expect," "intend"“anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “plans,” “believes,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. Factors which could affect our financial results are described in Item 1A below and in Item 7 of Part II of this Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

Comment regarding ourWe use a fiscal calendar widely used by the retail industry that results in a fiscal year end: The Company's fiscal year is based onconsisting of a 52/52- or 53-week yearperiod ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. This change first became effective forEach fiscal year 2003, whichconsists of four 13-week quarters, with an extra week added to the fourth quarter every five or six years. Fiscal 2010 was the 52-week period ending January 29, 2011. Fiscal 2009 was the 52-week period ended onJanuary 30, 2010. Fiscal 2008 was the 52-week period ended January 31, 2004.2009.

"Zumiez," the "Company," "we," "us," "our"“Company,” “we,” “us,” “its,” “our” and similar references refer to Zumiez Inc. and ourits wholly-owned subsidiary Zumiez Nevada, LLC.subsidiaries.

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Item 1.    BUSINESS

        We areZumiez Inc., a mall basedWashington corporation, is a leading specialty retailer of action sports related apparel, footwear, equipment and accessories operating under the Zumiez brand name. As ofAt January 31, 200929, 2011, we operated 343400 stores primarily located in shopping malls, giving us a presence in 3137 states. We were founded in 1978 by Thomas D. Campion, our Chairman. Our current Chief Executive Officer, Richard M. Brooks joined us as Chief Financial Officer in 1993. Our stores cater to young men and women between the ages of 12 and 24 who seek popular brands representing a lifestyle centered on activities that include skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, BMXbicycle motocross (or “BMX”) and motocross. We support the action sports lifestyle and promote our brand through a multi-faceted marketing approach that is designed to integrate our brand image with our customers'customers’ activities and interests. This approach, combined with our differentiated merchandising strategy, store design, comprehensive training programs and passionate employees, allows us to provide an experience for our customers that we believe is consistent with their attitudes, fashion tastes and identities and is otherwise unavailable in most malls. In addition, we operate a website that sells merchandise online and provides content and a community for our target customers. The Company was formed in August 1978.

Our stores bring the look and feel of an independent specialty shop to the mall by emphasizing the action sports lifestyle through a distinctive store environment and high-energy sales personnel. We seek to staff our stores with store associates who are knowledgeable users of our products, which we believe provides our customers with enhanced customer service and supplements our ability to identify and react quickly to emerging trends and fashions. We design our stores to appeal to teenagers and young adults and to serve as a destination for our customers. Most of our stores, which average approximately


Table of Contents


2,900 square feet, feature couches and action sports oriented video game stations that are intended to encourage our customers to shop for longer periods of time and to interact with each other and our store associates. To increase customer traffic, we generally locate our stores near busy areas of the mall such as food courts, movie theaters, music or game stores and other popular teen retailers. We believe that our distinctive store concept and compelling store economics will provide continued opportunities for growth in both new and existing markets.


We believe that our customers desire merchandise and fashion that is rooted in the action sports lifestyle and reflects their individuality. We strive to keep our merchandising mix fresh by continuously introducing new brands and styles and categories of product. Our focus on a diverse collection of brands allows us to quickly adjust to changing fashion trends. We believe that our strategic mix of both apparel and hardgoods, including skateboards, snowboards, bindings, components and other equipment, allows us to strengthen the potential of the brands we sell and helps to affirm our credibility with our customers. In addition, we supplement our stores with a select offering of private label apparel and products as a value proposition that we believe complements our overall merchandise selection.

Over our 30-year32-year history, we have developed a corporate culture based on a passion for the action sports lifestyle. Our management philosophy emphasizes an integrated combination of results measurement, training and incentive programs, all designed to drive sales productivity at the individual store associate level. We empower our store managers to make store-level business decisions and consistently reward their success. We seek to enhance the productivity of our employees and encourage their advancement by offering comprehensive in-store, regional and national training programs, which we refer to collectively as "Zumiez“Zumiez University." We have:

Competitive Strengths

We believe that the following competitive strengths differentiate us from our competitors and are critical to our continuing success.

Attractive Lifestyle Retailing Concept.Concept. We target a large population of 12 to 24 year olds, many of whom we believe are attracted to the action sports lifestyle and desire to promote their personal independence and style through the apparel, shoes and accessories they wear and the equipment they use. We believe that action sports areis a permanent and growing aspect of youth culture, reaching not only consumers that actually participate in action sports, but also those who seek brands and styles that fit a desired action sports image. We believe we have developed a brand image that our customers view as consistent with their attitudes, fashion tastes and identity that should allow us to benefit in our market.

Differentiated Merchandising Strategy. We have created a highly differentiated retailing concept by offering an extensive selection of current and relevant action sports brands encompassing apparel, footwear, equipment and accessories. The breadth of merchandise offered at our stores exceeds that offered by many other action sports specialty stores and includes some brands and products that are


Table of Contents


available within many malls only at our stores. The action sports lifestyle includes activities that are popular at different times throughout the year, providing us the opportunity to shift our merchandise selection seasonally. Many of our customers desire to update their wardrobes and equipment as fashion trends evolve or the action sports season dictates. We believe that our ability to quickly recognize changing brand and style preferences and transition our merchandise offerings allows us to continually provide a compelling offering to our customers.

Deep-rooted Corporate Culture. Our culture and brand image enable us to successfully attract and retain high quality employees who are passionate and knowledgeable about the products we sell. We place great emphasis on customer service and satisfaction, and we have made this a defining feature of our corporate culture. To preserve

our culture, we strive to promote store managers from within and they are given extensive responsibility for most aspects of store level management. We provide these managers with the knowledge and tools to succeed through our comprehensive training programs and the flexibility to manage their stores to meet localized customer demand. Our store leadership at the district manager level and above have all been promoted from within the Zumiez system and their leadership provides unique value and insight to our store managers and sales associates.

Distinctive Store Experience. We strive to provide a convenient shopping environment that is appealing and clearly communicates our distinct brand image. Our stores are designed to reflect an "organized chaos"“organized chaos” that we believe is consistent with many teenagers'teenagers’ and young adults'adults’ lifestyles. We seek to attract knowledgeable store associates who identify with the action sports lifestyle and are able to offer superior customer service, advice and product expertise. To further enhance our customers'customers’ experience, most of our stores feature areas with couches and action sports oriented video game stations that are intended to encourage our customers to shop for longer periods of time, to interact with each other and our store associates in a familiar and comfortable setting and to visit our stores more frequently. We believe that our distinctive store environment enhances our image as a leading source for apparel and equipment for the action sports lifestyle.

Disciplined Operating Philosophy. We have an experienced senior management team. Our management team has built a strong operating foundation based on sound retail principles that underlie our unique culture. Our philosophy emphasizes an integrated combination of results measurement, training and incentive programs, all designed to drive sales productivity down to the individual store associate level. Our comprehensive training programs are designed to provide our home office staff, managers and store associates with enhanced product knowledge, selling skills and operational expertise. We believe that our merchandising team'steam’s immersion in the actionsaction sports lifestyle, supplemented with feedback from our customers, store associates, store leadership and managers, allows us to consistently identify and react to emerging fashion trends. We believe that this, combined with our inventory planning and allocation processes and systems, helps us mitigatebetter manage markdown and fashion risk.

High-Impact, Integrated Marketing Approach. We seek to build relationships with our customers through a multi-faceted marketing approach that is designed to integrate our brand image with the action sports lifestyle. Our marketing efforts focus on reaching our customers in their environment and feature extensive grassroots marketing events, such as the Zumiez Couch Tour, which is a series of interactive sports, music and lifestyle events held at various locations throughout the United States. Our marketing efforts also incorporate local sporting and music event promotions, advertising in magazines popular with our target market, interactive contest sponsorships that actively involve our customers with our brands and products.products and various social network channels such as Facebook and Twitter. Events and activities such as these provide opportunities for our customers to develop a strong identity with our culture and brand. We believe that our immersion in the action sports lifestyle allows us to build credibility with our customers and gather valuable feedback on evolving customer preferences.


Table of Contents

Growth Strategy

We intend to expand our presence as a leading action sports lifestyle retailer by:

Opening New Store Locations. We believe that the action sports lifestyle has national appeal that provides store expansion opportunities throughout the country.country and internationally. Since the end of fiscal 2004January 28, 2006 through the year ended January 31, 2009 (fiscal 2008)29, 2011, we have opened or acquired 205233 new stores consisting of 35 new stores in fiscal 2005, 42 new62 stores in fiscal 2006, and 50 new stores in fiscal 2007, and 58 stores in fiscal 2008. We also acquired 100% of the ownership of 202008, 36 stores (17 in Texas, 2fiscal 2009 and 27 stores in Oklahoma and 1 in California) from Action Concepts Fast Forward, Ltd. (a limited partnership) ("Fast Forward"), an apparel and accessory retail sales company.fiscal 2010. We have successfully opened stores in diverse markets throughout the United States, which we believe demonstrates the portability and growth potential of our concept. We plan to open approximately 37 stores in fiscal 2009, including stores in our existing markets and in new markets, toTo take advantage of what we believe to be a compelling economic store model. Unlike previous years,model, we plan to open approximately 44 stores in fiscal 2011, including stores in our existing markets, in new markets domestically and the planned opening of our first international stores in Canada. The number of anticipated store openings may increase or decrease due to market conditions.

Continuing to Generate Sales Growth through Improved Store Level Productivity.Productivity and Continued Ecommerce Sales Growth. We seek to maximize our comparable store sales, including sales from our ecommerce site, and net sales per square foot by maintaining consistent store-level execution and offering our customers a broad and relevant selection of action sports brands and products. We also intendseek to continue to expandgrow our ecommerce sales with a continued focus on enhancing and integrating the unique Zumiez brand awareness in an effort to maintain high levelsexperience through this channel. In fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, ecommerce sales represented 4.7%, 2.5% and 1.7% of customer traffic.our total net sales.

Enhancing our Brand Awareness through Continued Marketing and Promotion. We believe that a key component of our success is the brand exposure that we receive from our marketing events, promotions and activities that embody the action sports lifestyle. These are designed to assist us in increasing brand awareness in our existing markets and expanding into new markets by strengthening our connection with our target customer base. We believe that our marketing efforts have also been successful in generating and promoting interest in our product offerings. In addition, we use our ecommerce presence, designed to convey our passion for the action sports lifestyle, to increase our brand awareness. We plan to continue to expand our integrated marketing efforts by promoting more events and activities in our existing and new markets.

The Action Sports Market

We believe that action sports are a permanent and growing aspect of youth culture, reaching not only consumers that actually participate in action sports, but also those who seek brands and styles that fit a desired action sports image. We believe that teens enjoy shopping in malls and purchasing clothing and fashion-related merchandise.benefit from branded vendors’ marketing.

Merchandising and Purchasing

        Merchandising.Our goal is to be viewed by our customers, both young men and young women, as the definitive source of merchandise for the action sports lifestyle. We believe that the breadth of merchandise offered at our stores, which includes apparel, footwear, equipment and accessories, exceeds that offered by many other action sports specialty stores at a single location, and makes our stores a single-stop purchase destination for our target customers. Our apparel offerings include tops, bottoms, outerwear and accessories such as caps, bags and backpacks, belts, jewelry and sunglasses. Our footwear offerings primarily consist of action sports related athletic shoes and sandals. Our equipment offerings, or hardgoods, include skateboards, snowboards and ancillary gear such as boots and bindings. We also offer a selection of other items, such as miscellaneous novelties and DVDs.

We seek to identify action sports oriented fashion trends as they develop and to respond in a timely manner with a relevant in-store product assortment. We strive to keep our merchandising mix


Table of Contents


fresh by continuously introducing new brands or styles in response to the evolving desires of our customers. We also take advantage of the change in action sports seasons during the year to maintain an updated product selection. Our merchandise mix may vary by region, reflecting the specific action sports preferences and seasons in different parts of the country.

We believe that offering an extensive selection of current and relevant brands used and sometimes developed by professional action sports athletes is integral to our overall success. No single brand, including private label, accounted for more than 6.6%6.5%, 7.1% and 6.9% of our net sales in fiscal 20072010, 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively.2008. We believe that our strategic mix of both apparel and hardgoods, including skateboards, snowboards, bindings, components and other equipment, allows us to strengthen the potential of the brands we sell and affirms our credibility with our customers.

We believe that our ability to maintain an image consistent with the action sports lifestyle is important to our key vendors. Given our scale and market position, we believe that many of our key vendors view us as an important retail partner. This position helps ensure our ability to procure a relevant product assortment and quickly respond to the changing fashion interests of our customers. Additionally, we believe we are presented with a greater variety of products and styles by some of our vendors, as well as certain specially designed items that are only distributed to our stores.

We supplement our merchandise assortment with a select offering of private label products across many of our apparel product categories. Our private label products complement the

branded products we sell, and some of our private label brands allow us to cater to the more value-oriented customer. For fiscal 2006, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2008 our private label merchandise represented approximately, 14.3%18.0%, 15.4%15.7% and 15.0% respectively, of our net sales.

        Purchasing.    Our merchandising staff consists of a general merchandising manager, planning staff and a staff of buyers and assistant buyers. Our purchasing approach focuses on quality, speed and cost in order to provide timely delivery of merchandise to our stores. We have developed a disciplined approach to buying and a dynamic inventory planning and allocation process to support our merchandise strategy. We utilize a broad vendor base that allows us to shift our merchandise purchases as required to react quickly to changing market conditions. We manage the purchasing and allocation process by reviewing branded merchandise lines from new and existing vendors, identifying emerging fashion trends and selecting branded merchandise styles in quantities, colors and sizes to meet inventory levels established by management. We also coordinate inventory levels in connection with individual store sales strength, our promotions and seasonality. Our management information systems provide us with current inventory levels at each store and for our companyCompany as a whole, as well as current selling history within each store by merchandise classification and by style. We purchase most of our branded merchandise from domestic vendors.

Our merchandising staff remains in tune with the action sports culture by participating in action sports, attending relevant events and concerts, watching action sports related programming and reading action sports publications. In order to identify evolving trends and fashion preferences, our staff spends considerable time analyzing sales data by category and brand down to the stock keeping unit, or "SKU"“SKU” (an identification used for inventory tracking purposes) level, gathering feedback from our stores and customers, shopping in key markets and soliciting input from our vendors. As part of our feedback collection process, our merchandise team receives merchandise requests from both customers and store associates and meets with our store managers two to three times per year to discuss current customer trends.

We source our private label merchandise from foreign manufacturers around the world. We have cultivated our private brand sources with a view towards high quality merchandise, production reliability and consistency of fit. We believe that our knowledge of fabric and production costs combined with a flexible sourcing base enables us to source high-quality private label goods at favorable costs.


Table of Contents

Distribution and Fulfillment

Timely and efficient distribution of merchandise to our stores is an important component of our overall business strategy. We process the vast majority of our merchandise throughDuring fiscal 2010, we relocated our distribution center infrom Everett, Washington.Washington to Corona, California to reduce distribution costs, expand capacity and increase speed of merchandise delivery to our customers. At thisour Corona, California facility, merchandise is inspected, allocated to stores, ticketed when necessary and boxed for distribution to our stores or segregated in our ecommerce fulfillment area for delivery to our ecommerce customers.stores. A significant percentage of our merchandise is currently pre-ticketed by our vendors, which allows us to ship merchandise more quickly, reduces labor costs and enhances our inventory management. We continue to work with our vendors to increase the percentage of pre-ticketed merchandise.merchandise as well as other value added services. Each store is typically shipped merchandise five times a week, providing our stores with a steady flow of new merchandise. We currently use United Parcel Service to ship the majority of our merchandise to our stores. We believe our current distribution infrastructure is sufficient to accommodate our expected store growth and expanded product offerings over the next several years.


Table of Contents

Stores

        As ofStore Locations.At January 31, 200929, 2011, we operated 343400 stores with an average of approximately 2,900 square feet per store in 3137 states. All of our stores are leased and substantially all are located in shopping malls of different types. All references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to square footage of our stores refers to gross square footage, including retail selling, storage and back-office space.

The following store list shows the number of stores we operated in each state as ofat January 31, 2009:29, 2011:

State
 Number of
Stores
 Percent of
Total Stores
 

Alaska

  3  0.9% 

Arizona

  12  3.5% 

California

  69  20.1% 

Colorado

  17  5.0% 

Connecticut

  6  1.7% 

Delaware

  1  0.3% 

Florida

  16  4.7% 

Hawaii

  1  0.3% 

Iowa

  1  0.3% 

Idaho

  6  1.7% 

Illinois

  14  4.1% 

Indiana

  6  1.7% 

Maine

  2  0.6% 

Maryland

  7  2.0% 

Minnesota

  11  3.2% 

Montana

  4  1.2% 

New Jersey

  15  4.4% 

Nevada

  8  2.3% 

New Mexico

  5  1.5% 

New York

  31  9.0% 

Oklahoma

  2  0.6% 

Oregon

  12  3.5% 

Pennsylvania

  14  4.1% 

Rhode Island

  1  0.3% 

South Dakota

  1  0.3% 

Texas

  31  9.0% 

Utah

  12  3.5% 

Virginia

  2  0.6% 

Washington

  23  6.7% 

Wisconsin

  8  2.3% 

Wyoming

  2  0.6% 
      
 

Total Number of Stores

  343  100.0% 
      

 As of January 31, 2009 approximately 78.1%

State

  Number of
Stores
   Percent of
Total Stores
 

Alaska

   3     0.7

Arizona

   13     3.3

California

   75     18.7

Colorado

   18     4.5

Connecticut

   8     2.0

Delaware

   2     0.5

Florida

   16     4.0

Hawaii

   1     0.2

Iowa

   2     0.5

Idaho

   6     1.5

Illinois

   16     4.0

Indiana

   7     1.8

Kansas

   3     0.7

Maine

   1     0.2

Maryland

   8     2.0

Massachusetts

   7     1.8

Michigan

   2     0.5

Minnesota

   11     2.8

Missouri

   2     0.5

Montana

   4     1.0

New Jersey

   16     4.0

New Hampshire

   3     0.7

Nevada

   8     2.0

New Mexico

   5     1.3

New York

   30     7.5

North Carolina

   2     0.5

Oklahoma

   3     0.7

Oregon

   12     3.0

Pennsylvania

   16     4.0

Rhode Island

   1     0.2

South Dakota

   2     0.5

Texas

   41     10.3

Utah

   12     3.0

Virginia

   5     1.3

Washington

   24     6.0

Wisconsin

   13     3.3

Wyoming

   2     0.5
          

Total Number of Stores

   400     100.0
          

Approximately 63% of our stores hadhave been opened or remodeled within the previous five fiscal years. The following table shows the number of stores (excluding temporary stores that we operate from time to time for special events) opened and closed in each of our last five fiscal


Table of Contents


years including 20 stores acquired in the fiscal 2006 Fast Forward acquisition (we closed one Fast Forward store in fiscal 2006):acquisition:

Fiscal Year Stores
Opened
 Stores
Acquired
 Stores
Closed
 Total Number
of Stores
End of Year
 
 2004  27      140 
 2005  35    1  174 
 2006  42  20  1  235 
 2007  50      285 
 2008  58      343 

Fiscal Year  Stores
Opened
  Stores
Acquired
  Stores
Closed
  

Total Number of
Stores End of Year

2010  27  —    4  400
2009  36  —    2  377
2008  58  —    —    343
2007  50  —    —    285
2006  42  20  1  235

Store Design and Environment.We design our stores to create a distinctive and engaging shopping environment that we believe resonates with our customers and it reflects an "organized chaos"“organized chaos” that is consistent with many teenagers'teenagers’ and young adults'adults’ lifestyles. Our stores feature an industrial look with concrete floors and open ceilings, dense merchandise displays, action sports focused posters and signage and popular music, all of which are consistent with the look and feel of an independent action sports specialty shop. Most of our stores have couches and action sports oriented video game stations that are intended to encourage our customers to shop for longer periods of time, to interact with each other and our store associates and to visit our stores more frequently. Our stores are constructed and finished to allow us to efficiently shift merchandise displays throughout the year as the action sports season dictates. To further enhance our customers' experience, we seek to attract enthusiastic store associates who are knowledgeable about our products and are able to offer superior customer service and expertise. We believe that our store atmosphere enhances our image as a leading provider of action sports lifestyle merchandise.

        As ofAt January 31, 200929, 2011, our stores averaged approximately 2,900 square feet. In recent years we have been opening newAll references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to square footage of our stores that averaged approximately 3,000refers to gross square feet, slightly larger than our historical average size. These larger stores were intended to allow us to offer an expanded merchandise selection while maintaining our distinctive store environment.footage, including retail selling, storage and back-office space. In fiscal 2009,2011, we plan on opening new stores with average square footage closersimilar to the 2,900 square foot average of our stores currently open.this average. New storesstores’ size is determined by our expected sales volume; for instance, if we project higher sales, we generally try to build larger stores and, conversely, if we believe stores will be lower volume stores we generally try to build smaller stores.

Expansion Opportunities and Site Selection.    Since the end of fiscal 2004, we have opened 205 stores, including 20 acquired in fiscal 2006 through the Fast Forward acquisition, to enhance our position in existing markets, to enter into new markets, to build our brand awareness and to capitalize on our successful store model. We plan to open approximately 37 new stores in fiscal 2009 and to continue to open a significant number of new stores in future years. Unlike previous years, the number of anticipated store openings in fiscal 2009 may increase or decrease due to market conditions. We have opened or acquired, on average, approximately twenty-five percent new stores over each of the last five years. As we look to fiscal 2009 and beyond, we will likely slow this rate of growth until we see the macroeconomic environment improve. We plan to open new stores in both existing and new markets.

In selecting a location for a new store, we target high-traffic mall space with suitable demographics and favorable lease terms. We seek locations near busy areas of the mall such as food courts, movie theaters, music or game stores and other popular teen retailers. We generally locate our stores in malls in which other teen-oriented retailers have performed well. We also focus on evaluating the market and mall-specific competitive environment for potential new store locations. We seek to diversify our store locations regionally and by caliber of mall. We have currently identified a significant number of potential sites for new stores in malls with appropriate market characteristics.


Table of Contents

We have successfully and consistently implemented our store concept across a variety of mall classifications and geographic locations. Our 5036 new stores opened duringin fiscal 2007,2009 generated average net sales of approximately $1.0$0.9 million per store in fiscal 2010 during their first full year of operation. On average, our net capital investment to open the 50 newIn fiscal 2010, we opened 27 stores in fiscal 2007 was approximately $330,000 per store, which includes capital expenditures, net of landlord contributions. We opened 58 new stores in fiscal 2008 with an average net capital investment of approximately $311,000$0.2 million per store which includes capital expenditures, net of landlord contributions.by negotiating favorable terms with our construction contractors and obtaining tenant improvement allowances from landlords. In addition to capital investments, we make working capital investments between $0.1 million and $0.2 million per store consisting primarily of merchandise inventory. However, our capital investment net of landlord contributions, to open new stores and net sales generated by new stores vary significantly and depend on a number of factors, including manager and sales associate competency and tenure, the geographic location, type of mall, sales volume of the mall and sizesquare footage of those stores. Accordingly, net sales and other operating results for stores that we open or have opened subsequent to the end of fiscal 2008,2010, as well as our net capital investment to open those stores, may differ substantially from net sales and other operating results and our net capital investment for the stores we opened in prior years.

Store Management, Operations and Training. We believe that our success is dependent in part on our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate qualified employees at all levels of our organization. We have developed a corporate culture that we believe empowers the individual store managers to make store-level business decisions and consistently rewards their success. We are committed to improving the skills and careers of our workforce and providing advancement opportunities for employees, as evidenced by a significant number of our store managers that began their careers with us as store associates.

Our store operations are currently organized into divisions, regions and districts. Each division is managed by a divisional manager, responsible for approximately one third of our stores. Each region is managed by a regional manager, responsible for approximately 50 stores. We employ one district sales manager per district, responsible for the sales and operations of approximately 910 stores. Each of our stores is typically staffed with one store manager, one or more assistant managers and two or more store associates, depending on the season.season and sales volume of the store. The number of store associates we employ generally increases during peak selling seasons, particularly the back-to-school and the winter holiday seasons, and will increase to the extent that we open new stores.

We believe we provide our managers with the knowledge and tools to succeed through our comprehensive training programs and the flexibility to manage their stores to meet customer demands. While general guidelines for our merchandise assortments, store layouts and in-store visuals are provided by our home office, we give our store managers and district managers substantial discretion to tailor their stores to the individual market and empower them to make store-level business decisions. We design group training programs for our managers, such as our "Zumiez“Zumiez Managers Retreat," and "Rocktember,"“Rocktober,” to improve both operational expertise and supervisory skills. Our comprehensive training programs are offered at the store, regional and national levels. Our programs allow managers from all geographic locations to interact with each other and exchange ideas to better operate stores. Our regional,store, district, and storeregional managers are compensated in part based on the sales volume of the store or stores they manage.

Our store associates generally have an interest in the action sports lifestyle and are knowledgeable about our products. Through our training, evaluation and incentive programs, we seek to enhance the productivity of our store associates. Our store associates receive extensive training from their managers to improve their product expertise and selling skills. We evaluate our store associates weekly on measures such as sales per hour, itemsunits per transaction and dollars per transaction to ensure consistent productivity, to reward top performers and to identify potential training opportunities. We provide sales incentives for store associates such as sales-based commissions in addition to hourly wages and our annual "Zumiez 100K"“Zumiez 100K” event, which recognizes outstanding sales performance in a resort setting that combines recreation and education. These and other incentive programs are designed to promote a


Table of Contents


competitive, yet fun, corporate culture that is consistent with the action sports lifestyle we seek to promote.

        Ecommerce Operations.    Our website provides current information on our upcoming events and promotions, store locations and merchandise selection. We also sell products directly through our website, although ecommerce sales currently comprise a small portion of our overall net sales. In fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008 ecommerce sales represented 0.8%, 1.1% and 1.5% of our total net sales. With respect to the freight component of our ecommerce sales, we arrange and pay the freight for our customers and bill them for this service unless the customer chooses to have their product shipped to one of our stores, in which case shipping is free. Such amounts billed are included in revenue and the related freight cost is charged to cost of goods sold.

Marketing and Advertising

We seek to reach our target customer audience through a multi-faceted marketing approach that is designed to integrate our brand image with the action sports lifestyle. Our marketing efforts focus on reaching our customers in their environment, and feature extensive grassroots marketing events, such as the Zumiez Couch Tour, which give our customers an opportunity to experience and participate in the action sports lifestyle.

        Our marketing efforts also incorporate local sporting and music event promotions, advertising in magazines popular with our target market such as Transworld Snowboarding and Transworld Skateboarding, interactive contest sponsorships that actively involve our customers with our brands and products. We believe that our immersion in the action sports lifestyle allows us to build credibility with our target audience and gather valuable feedback on evolving customer preferences.

Our grassroots marketing events are built around the demographics of our customer base and offer an opportunity for our customers to develop a strong identity with our brand and culture. For example, the Zumiez Couch Tour is a series of entertainment events that includes skateboarding demonstrations from top professionals, autograph sessions, competitions and live music, and has featured some of today'stoday’s most popular teenage personalities in action sports and music. The Zumiez Couch Tour provides a high-impact platform where customers can interact with some of their favorite action sports athletes and vendors can showcase new products. In 2008fiscal 2010, our Zumiez Couch Tour completed a twelve citytwelve-city tour across the United States.

        Advertising expense was approximately, $651,000 $748,000

Our marketing efforts also incorporate local sporting and $763,000music event promotions, advertising in fiscal 2006, 2007magazines popular with our target market, interactive contest sponsorships that actively involve our customers with our brands and 2008, respectively.products and various social network channels such as Facebook and Twitter. We believe that our immersion in the action sports lifestyle allows us to build credibility with our target audience and gather valuable feedback on evolving customer preferences.

Management Information Systems

Our management information systems provide integration of store, merchandising, distribution, financial and human resources functions. The systems include applications related to point-of-sale, inventory management, supply chain, planning, sourcing, merchandising and financial reporting. We use software licensed from ANT USA for merchandise planningcontinue to invest in technology to align our systems with our business requirements and software licensed from Epicor CRS, that is used for SKU and classification inventory tracking, purchase order management, merchandise distribution, automated ticket making and sales audit functions. Our financial systems are licensed from SAGE and are used for general ledger, accounts payable, payroll, budgeting, financial reporting and asset management.

        Sales are updated daily into support our merchandising reporting systems by polling sales information from each store's point-of-sale, or "POS," terminals. Our POS system consists of registers providing processing of retail transactions, price look-up, time and attendance and e-mail. Sales information, inventory tracking and payroll hours are uploaded to our central host system. The host system downloads price changes, performs system maintenance and provides software updates to the stores through automated nightly two-way electronic communication with each store. We evaluate information


Table of Contents


obtained through nightly polling to implement merchandising decisions, including product purchasing/reorders, markdowns and allocation of merchandise on a daily basis.

        In addition to our home office staff, each of our regional and district managers can access relevant business information, including current and historical sales by store, district and region, transaction information and payroll data.continuing growth.

Competition

The teenage and young adult retail apparel, hardgoods and accessories industry is highly competitive. We compete with other retailers for vendors, teenage and young adult customers, suitable store locations and qualified store associates and management personnel. In the softgoods markets, which includes apparel, accessories and footwear, we currently compete with other teenage-focused retailers such as Abercrombie & Fitch, Co., Aeropostale, Inc.,American Apparel, American Eagle Outfitters, Inc., Anchor Blue Clothing Company,Boathouse, CCS, Forever 21, Inc., Hollister, Co., Hot Topic, Inc., Old Navy, Inc., Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc., The Buckle, Inc., The Wet Seal, Inc. andTillys, Urban Outfitters Inc.and West 49. In addition, in the softgoods markets we compete with independent specialty shops, department stores and direct marketers that sell similar lines of merchandise and target customers through catalogs and ecommerce. In the hardgoods markets, which includes skateboards, snowboards, bindings, components and other equipment, we compete directly or indirectly with the following categories of companies: other specialty retailers that compete with us across a significant portion of our merchandising categories, such as local snowboard and skate shops; large-format sporting goods stores and chains, such as Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, Dick'sDick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., Sport Chalet Inc. and The Sports Authority Inc., and ecommerce retailers.

Competition in our sector is based on, among other things, merchandise offerings, store location, price and the ability to identify with the customer. We believe that we compete favorably with many of our competitors based on our differentiated merchandising strategy, compelling store environment and deep-rooted culture. However, some of our competitors are larger than we are and have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. See "Item“Item 1A Risk Factors." We may be unable to compete favorably in the highly competitive retail industry, and if we lose customers to our competitors, our sales could decrease."

Seasonality

Historically, our operations have been seasonal, with the largest portion of net sales and net income occurring in the third and fourth fiscal quarters, reflecting increased demand during the back-to-school and yearendwinter holiday selling seasons. During fiscal 2008,2010, approximately 58%61% of our net sales and 76% of our net income occurred in the third and fourth quarters.quarters, similar to previous years. As a result of this seasonality, any factors negatively affecting us during the last half of the year, including unfavorable economic conditions, adverse weather or our ability to acquire seasonal merchandise inventory, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the entire year. Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate based upon such factors as the timing of certain holiday seasons, the popularity of seasonal merchandise offered, the timing and amount of markdowns, store remodels and closings, competitive influences and the number and timing of new store openings.

Trademarks

        "Zumiez," "Free World," "Alab," "Tricycle," "Alibi," "Fast Forward,"The “Zumiez” trademark and "Empyre"certain other trademarks, have been registered, or are among our trademarks registeredthe subject of pending trademark applications, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.Office and with the registries of certain foreign countries. We regard our trademarks as valuable and intend to maintain such marks and any related registrations. We currently have trademarks pending for the"Rälik," "Aperture," "Couch Tour,"registrations and "Zumiez Couch Tour" marks. We are not aware of any claims of infringement or other challenges to our right to use our marks in


Table of Contents


the United States. We vigorously protect our trademarks. We also own numerous domain names, which have been registered with Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

Employees

        As ofAt January 31, 200929, 2011, we employed approximately 1,6501,380 full-time and approximately 2,0003,460 part-time employees, of which approximately 350440 were employed at our home office, distribution center and ecommerce fulfillment center and approximately 3,3004,400 at our store locations. However, the number of part-time employees fluctuates depending on our seasonal needs and, in fiscal 2008,2010, varied from between approximately 1,8003,000 and 3,4005,400 part-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we believe generally that our relationship with our employees is good.

Available Information

Our principal website address iswww.zumiez.com. www.zumiez.com. We make available, free of charge, our proxy statement, annual report to shareholders, annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC athttp://ir.zumiez.com.ir.zumiez.com. Information available on our website is not incorporated by reference in and is not deemed a part of this Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

Item 1A.RISK FACTORS

Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. The following risk factors, issues and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating our future prospects. In particular, keep these risk factors in mind when you read "forward-looking"“forward-looking” statements elsewhere in this report. Forward- lookingForward-looking statements relate to our expectations for future events and time periods. Generally, the words "anticipate," "believe," "expect," "intend"“anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Any of the following risks could harm our business, operating results or financial condition and could result in a complete loss of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we currently think are immaterial may also harm our business and financial condition in the future.

Significant fluctuations and volatility in the price of cotton, foreign labor costs and other raw materials used in the production of our merchandise may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

Increases in the cost of cotton, foreign labor costs or other raw materials used in the production of our merchandise can result in higher costs in the price we pay for this merchandise. The costs for cotton are affected by weather, consumer demand, speculation on the commodities market and other factors that are generally unpredictable and beyond our control. Our gross profit and earnings per share could be adversely affected to the extent that the selling prices of our products do not increase proportionately with the increases in the costs of cotton or other materials. Increasing labor costs and oil-related product costs, such as manufacturing and transportation costs, could also adversely impact gross profit. Additionally, significant changes in the relationship between carrier capacity and shipper demand could increase transportation costs, which could also adversely impact gross profit.

We are aware of increasing cotton, oil and other input costs that affect our cost of goods sold. We are working with our vendors and private label manufacturers to manage these cost increases. Our current expectation is that increases in product cost will be higher in the second half of 2011 versus the first half. While we believe we have strategies in place to mitigate the increase in cost, there can be no assurance our efforts will be successful and our gross profit margins may decline.

Most of our merchandise is produced by foreign manufacturers; therefore, the availability and costs of these products may be negatively affected by risks associated with international trade and other international conditions.

Most of our merchandise is produced by manufacturers around the world. Some of these facilities are located in regions that may be affected by natural disasters, political instability or other conditions that could cause a disruption in trade. Trade restrictions such as increased tariffs or quotas, or both, could also affect the importation of merchandise generally and increase the cost and reduce the supply of merchandise available to us. Any reduction in merchandise available to us or any increase in its cost due to tariffs, quotas or local issues that disrupt trade could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Although the prices charged by vendors for the merchandise we purchase are primarily denominated in United States dollars, a continued decline in the relative value of the United States dollar to foreign currencies could lead to increased merchandise costs, which could negatively affect our competitive position and our results of operation.

Our ability to attract customers to our stores depends heavily on the success of the shopping malls in which our stores are located; any decrease in customer traffic in those malls could cause our sales to be less than expected.

In order to generate customer traffic we depend heavily on locating our stores in prominent locations within successful shopping malls. Sales at these stores are derived, in part, from the volume of traffic in those malls. Our stores benefit from the ability of a mall’s other tenants to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of our stores and the continuing popularity of malls as shopping destinations. Our sales volume and mall traffic generally may be adversely affected by, among other things, economic downturns in a particular area, competition from ecommerce retailers, non-mall retailers and other malls, increases in gasoline prices and the closing or decline in popularity of other stores in the malls in which we are located. An uncertain economic outlook could curtail new shopping mall development, decrease shopping mall traffic, reduce the number of hours that shopping mall operators keep their shopping malls open or force them to cease operations entirely. A reduction in mall traffic as a result of these or any other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our growth strategy depends on our ability to open and operate a significant number of new stores each year, which could strain our resources and cause the performance of our existing stores to suffer.

Our growth largely depends on our ability to open and operate new stores successfully. However, our ability to open new stores is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including the current deterioration of the macroeconomic environment, and we may be unable to open new stores as planned, and any failure to successfully open and operate new stores would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and on the market price of our common stock.operations. We intend to continue to open new stores in future years while remodeling a portion of our existing store base annually. In addition, our proposed expansion will place increased demands on our operational, managerial and administrative resources. These increased demands could cause us to operate our business less effectively, which in turn could cause deterioration in the financial performance of our individual stores and our overall business. To the extent our new store openings are in markets where we already have stores, we may experience reduced net sales in existing stores in those markets. In addition, successful execution of our growth strategy may require that we obtain additional financing, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain that financing on acceptable terms or at all.

        Unlike previous years, the number of anticipated store openings in fiscal 2009 may increase or decrease due to market conditions. We have opened or acquired, on average, approximately twenty-five percent new stores over the last five years. As we look to fiscal 2009 and beyond, we will likely slow this rate of growth until we see the macroeconomic environment improve.

If we fail to effectively execute our expansion strategy, we may not be able to successfully open new store locations in a timely manner, if at all, which could have an adverse affect on our net sales and results of operations.

Our ability to open and operate new stores successfully depends on many factors, including, among others, our ability to:

In addition, many of our planned new stores are to be opened in regions of the United States or international locations in which we currently have few, or no, stores. The expansion into these markets may present competitive,


Table of Contents


merchandising and distribution challenges that are different from those currently encountered in our existing markets. Any of these challenges could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

        BeginningThe expansion of our store base to Canada may present increased risks due to our limited familiarity with that market.

In fiscal 2011, we plan to open store locations in September 2007, we sawCanada. The Canadian market may have different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our same store sales start to declineexisting markets. As a result, new stores in California, Nevada and Arizona. Our new store sales in these states, and Florida, were also negatively affected by the deteriorating macroeconomic environment in those states. Those trends continued into fiscal 2008 and beginning in September 2008,that market may be less successful than our stores in the entire western halfUnited States. Additionally, consumers in the Canadian market may not be familiar with our brand, and we may need to build brand awareness in that market. Furthermore, we have limited experience with the legal and regulatory environments and market practices outside of the United States began experiencing same store sales declines. Sales fromand cannot guarantee that we will be able penetrate or successfully operate in the Canadian market. We may also incur additional costs in complying with applicable Canadian laws and regulations as they pertain to both our stores in Floridaproducts and the western half of the United States accounted for approximately 60% or our total net sales in fiscal 2008.operations.

Our business is dependent upon our being able to anticipate, identify and respond to changing fashion trends, customer preferences and other fashion-related factors; failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on us.

Customer tastes and fashion trends in the action sports lifestyle market are volatile and tend to change rapidly. Our success depends on our ability to effectively anticipate, identify and respond to changing fashion tastes and consumer preferences, and to translate market trends into appropriate, saleable product offerings in a timely manner. If we are unable to successfully anticipate, identify or respond to changing styles or trends and misjudge the market for our products or any new product lines, our sales may be lower than predicted and we may be faced with a substantial amount of unsold inventory or missed opportunities. In response to such a situation, we may be forced to rely on markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of excess or slow-moving inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our ability to attract customers to our stores depends heavily onThe current uncertainty surrounding the success of the shopping mallsUnited States economy coupled with cyclical economic trends in which our stores are located; any decrease in customer traffic in those malls could cause our sales to be less than expected.

        In order to generate customer traffic we depend heavily on locating our stores in prominent locations within successful shopping malls. Sales at these stores are derived, in part, from the volume of traffic in those malls. Our stores benefit from the ability of a mall's other tenants to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of our stores and the continuing popularity of malls as shopping destinations. Our sales volume and mall traffic generally may be adversely affected by, among other things, economic downturns in a particular area, competition from ecommerce retailers, non-mall retailers and other malls, increases in gasoline prices and the closing or decline in popularity of other stores in the malls in which we are located. A reduction in mall traffic as a result of these or any other factorsaction sports retailing could have a material adverse effect on our business,results of operations.

The action sports retail industry historically has been subject to substantial cyclicality. As economic conditions in the United States change, the trends in discretionary consumer spending become unpredictable and discretionary consumer spending could be reduced due to uncertainties about the future. When discretionary

consumer spending is reduced, purchases of action sports apparel and related products may decline. The current uncertainty in the United States economy and increased government debt spending may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.position.

Because of this cycle, we believe the “value” message has become more important to consumers. As a retailer that sells approximately 82% branded merchandise, this trend may negatively affect our business, as we generally will have to charge more than vertically integrated private label retailers.

Our sales and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis, leaving our operating results particularly susceptible to changes in back-to-school and winter holiday shopping patterns.

Our sales and profitability are typically disproportionately higher in the third and fourth fiscal quarters of each fiscal year due to increased sales during the back-to-school and winter holiday shopping seasons. Sales during these periods cannot be used as an accurate indicator of annual results. Our sales in the first and second fiscal quarters are typically lower than in our third and fourth fiscal quarters due, in part, to the traditional retail slowdown immediately following the winter holiday season. As a result of this seasonality, any factors negatively affecting us during the last half of the year, including unfavorable economic conditions, adverse weather or our ability to acquire seasonal merchandise inventory, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the entire year. In addition, in order to prepare for the back-to-school and winter holiday shopping seasons, we must order and keep in stock significantly more merchandise than we carry during other times of the year. Any unanticipated decrease in demand for our products during these peak shopping seasons could


Table of Contents


require us to sell excess inventory at a substantial markdown, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our quarterly results of operations are volatile and may decline.

Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated significantly in the past and can be expected to continue to fluctuate significantly in the future. As discussed above, our sales and operating results are typically lower in the first and second quarters of our fiscal year due, in part, to the traditional retail slowdown immediately following the winter holiday season. Our quarterly results of operations are affected by a variety of other factors, including:

Failure to successfully integrate any businesses or stores that we acquire could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial performance.

We may from time to time acquire other retail stores, individually or in groups, or businesses. We may experience difficulties in assimilating any stores or businesses we may acquire and any such acquisitions may also result in the diversion of our capital and our management'smanagement’s attention from other business issues and opportunities. We may not be able to successfully integrate any stores or businesses that we may acquire, including their facilities, personnel, financial systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures. If we fail to successfully integrate acquisitions or if such acquisitions fail to provide the benefits that we expect to receive, we could experience increased costs and other operating inefficiencies, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial performance.

Our business is susceptible to weather conditions that are out of our control including the potential risks of unpredictable weather patterns, including any weather patterns associated with naturally occurring global warming,climate change, and the resultant unseasonable weather could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our business is susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures (including any weather patterns associated with global warming)warming and cooling) during the winter season or cool weather during the summer season could render a portion of our inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions. These prolonged unseasonable weather conditions, particularly in regions of the United States where we have a concentration of stores, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.


Table of Contents


We may be unable to compete favorably in the highly competitive retail industry, and if we lose customers to our competitors, our sales could decrease.

The teenage and young adult retail apparel, hardgoods and accessories industry is highly competitive. We compete with other retailers for vendors, teenage and young adult customers, suitable store locations, qualified store associates and management personnel. In the softgoods market, which includes apparel, accessories and footwear, we currently compete with other teenage-focused retailers. In addition, in the softgoods market we compete with independent specialty shops, department stores and direct marketers that sell similar lines of merchandise and target customers through catalogs and ecommerce. In the hardgoods market, which includes skateboards, snowboards, bindings, components and other equipment, we compete directly or indirectly with the following categories of companies: other specialty retailers that compete with us across a significant portion of our merchandising categories, such as local snowboard and skate shops;shops, large-format sporting goods stores and chains and ecommerce retailers.

Some of our competitors are larger than we are and have substantially greater financial, marketing, including advanced ecommerce marketing capabilities, and other resources than we do. Direct competition with these and other retailers may increase significantly in the future, which could require us, among other things, to lower our prices and could result in the loss of our customers. Current and increased competition could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we fail to maintain good relationships with vendors or if a vendor is otherwise unable or unwilling to supply us with adequate quantities of their products at acceptable prices, our business and financial performance could suffer.

Our business is dependent on continued good relations with our vendors. In particular, we believe that we generally are able to obtain attractive pricing and other terms from vendors because we are perceived as a desirable customer, and deterioration in our relationship with our vendors would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not have any contractual relationships with our vendors, other than normal course of business purchase orders and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that our vendors will provide us with an

adequate supply or quality of products or acceptable pricing. Our vendors could discontinue selling to us or raise the prices they charge at any time. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire desired merchandise in sufficient quantities on terms acceptable to us in the future. Also,In addition, certain of our vendors'vendors sell their products directly to the retail market and therefore compete with us directly and other vendors may decide to do so in the future. There can be no assurance that such vendors will not decide to discontinue supplying their products to us, supply us only less popular or lower quality items, raise the prices they charge us or focus on selling their products directly. In addition, a number of our vendors are smaller, less capitalized companies and are more likely to be impacted by unfavorable general economic and market conditions than larger and better capitalized companies. These smaller vendors may not have sufficient liquidity during economic downturns to properly fund their businesses and their ability to supply their products to us could be negatively impacted. Any inability to acquire suitable merchandise at acceptable prices, or the loss of one or more key vendors, would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the talent required for our business, our financial performance could suffer.

Our performance depends largely on the efforts and abilities of our senior management, including our Co-Founder and Chairman, Thomas D. Campion, our Chief Executive Officer, Richard M. Brooks, our Chief Financial Officer, Trevor S. Lang, our President and General Merchandising Manager, Lynn K. Kilbourne, our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, Trevor S. Lang and our Executive Vice President of Stores, Ford K. Wright. None of our employees except Mr. Brooks, has anhave employment agreementagreements with us and we do not plan to obtain key person life


Table of Contents


insurance covering any of our employees. If we lose the services of one or more of our key executives, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our growth objectives. As our business grows, we will need to attract and retain additional qualified management personnel in a timely manner and we may not be able to do so.

Our failure to meet our staffing needs could adversely affect our ability to implement our growth strategy and could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including divisional managers, regional managers, district managers, store managers and store associates, who understand and appreciate our corporate culture based on a passion for the action sports lifestyle and are able to adequately represent this culture to our customers. Qualified individuals of the requisite caliber, skills and number needed to fill these positions may be in short supply in some areas, and the employee turnover rate in the retail industry is high. Competition for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages to attract a sufficient number of suitable employees. If we are unable to hire and retain store managers and store associates capable of consistently providing a high level of customer service, as demonstrated by their enthusiasm for our culture and knowledge of our merchandise, our ability to open new stores may be impaired and the performance of our existing and new stores could be materially adversely affected. We are also dependent upon temporary personnel to adequately staff our stores, distribution center and distributionecommerce fulfillment center particularly during busy periods such as the back-to-school and winter holiday seasons. There can be no assurance that we will receive adequate assistance from our temporary personnel, or that there will be sufficient sources of temporary personnel. Although none of our employees is currently covered by collective bargaining agreements, we cannot guarantee that our employees will not elect to be represented by labor unions in the future, which could increase our labor costs and could subject us to the risk of work stoppages and strikes. Any such failure to meet our staffing needs, any material increases in employee turnover rates, any increases in labor costs or any work stoppages, or interruptions or strikes could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Our operations, including our sole distribution center, are concentrated in the western United States, which makes us susceptible to adverse conditions in this region.

Our home office and sole distributionecommerce fulfillment center are located in a single facilityWashington, our sole distribution center is located in Washington,California and a substantial number of our stores are located in the western half of the United States.

We also have a substantial number of stores in the New York/New Jersey region and Texas. As a result, our business may be more susceptible to regional factors than the operations of more geographically diversified competitors. These factors include, among others, economic and weather conditions, demographic and population changes and fashion tastes. In addition, we rely on a single distribution center in Everett, Washington to receive, store and distribute the vast majority of our merchandise to all of our stores and to fulfill our ecommerce sales.stores. As a result, a natural disaster or other catastrophic event, such as an earthquake affecting western Washington, in particular, or the West Coast, in general, could significantly disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


TableWe have relocated our sole distribution center previously located in Everett, Washington to Corona, California to receive, store and distribute the vast majority of Contentsour merchandise to all of our retail stores. As a result, events may occur subsequent to the relocation that could significantly disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are required to make substantial rental payments under our operating leases and any failure to make these lease payments when due would likely have a material adverse effect on our business and growth plans.

We do not own any of our retail stores or our combined home office and distributionecommerce fulfillment center, but instead we lease all of these facilities under operating leases. Payments under these operating leases account for a significant portion of our operating expenses and has historically been our third largest expense behind cost of sales and our employee related costs. For example, total rental expense, including additional rental payments (or "percentage rent"“percentage rent”) based on sales of some of the stores, common area maintenance charges and real estate taxes, under operating leases was $31.9$61.8 million, $43.5$58.0 million and $52.9 million for the fiscal 2006, 2007,2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively. As of2008. At January 31, 200929, 2011, we were a party to operating leases requiring future minimum lease payments aggregating approximately $191.8$227.8 million through fiscal year 20132015 and approximately $134.7$120.0 million thereafter. In addition, substantially all of our store leases provide for additional rental payments based on sales of the respective stores, as well as common area maintenance charges, and require that we pay real estate taxes, none of which is included in the amount of future minimum lease payments.taxes. These amounts generally escalate each year. We expect that any new stores we open will also be leased by us under operating leases, which will further increase our operating lease expenses.

Our substantial operating lease obligations could have significant negative consequences, including:

We depend on cash flow from operations to pay our lease expenses and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities, and sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from borrowings under bank loans or from other sources, we may not be able to service our operating lease expenses, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or to fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which would have a material adverse effect on us.our business.

The terms of our revolving credit facility impose operating and financial restrictions on us that may impair our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions. This impairment could have a significant adverse impact on our business.

We have a $25 million revolvingrenewed and amended our secured credit facilityagreement with Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A., maturingon June 10, 2009, and the prior facility agreement was terminated. The credit agreement provides us with a secured revolving credit facility until September 1, 2011 of up to $25.0 million. The secured revolving credit facility

provides for the issuance of a standby letter of credit in August 2009,an amount not to exceed $5.0 million outstanding at any time and with a term not to exceed 365 days. The commercial line of credit provides for the issuance of a commercial letter of credit in an amount not to exceed $10.0 million and with terms not to exceed 120 days. The amount of borrowings available at any time under our secured revolving credit facility is reduced by the amount of standby and commercial letters of credit outstanding at that time. There were no outstanding borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility at January 29, 2011 or January 30, 2010. We had open commercial letters of credit outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility of $0.5 million and $0.6 million at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. The secured revolving credit facility bears interest at the Daily One Month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%. The credit agreement contains a number of significant restrictions and covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things, (1) incur additional indebtedness,debt, (2) enter into certain transactions and (3) undergo a change in ownership. In addition, all of our personal property, including our inventory, equipmentownership and fixtures, secure our obligations under the revolving credit agreement. Our(3) enter into certain transactions. The credit agreement also contains financial covenants that require us to meet certain specified financial tests and ratios, including, a minimummaximum net loss not to exceed $10.0 million after taxes on a trailing four-quarter basis provided, that, there shall be added to net income after taxes greater than $1.00all charges for any trailing twelve month period, a minimum total liabilities divided by tangible net worthimpairment of goodwill and store assets not greater than 1.15to exceed $5.0 million in aggregate, and a minimum quick asset ratio not less than 1.0. Our two most restrictiveof 1.25. The quick ratio is defined as our cash and near cash equivalents plus certain defined receivables divided by the outstanding borrowings. All of our personal property, including, among other things, our inventory, equipment and fixtures, has been pledged to secure our obligations under the credit agreement. We must also provide financial information and statements to our lender. We were in compliance with all such covenants are our quick asset ratio that essentially precludes us from borrowing to the extent we were to have no cash, marketable securities or accounts receivable and our net income covenant that requires us make at least $1.00 in net income after taxes for any trailing twelve month period. Our ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control.


Table of ContentsJanuary 29, 2011.

A breach of any of these restrictive covenants or our inability to comply with the required financial tests and ratios could result in a default under the credit agreement. If a default occurs, the lender may elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable. If we are unable to repay outstanding borrowings when due, whether at their maturity or if declared due and payable by the lender following a default, the lender has the right to proceed against the collateral granted to it to secure the indebtedness. As a result, any breach of these covenants or failure to comply with these tests and ratios could have a material adverse effect on us. There can be no assurance that we will not breach the covenants or fail to comply with the tests and ratios in our credit agreement or any other debt agreements we may enter into in the future and, if a breach occurs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain necessary waivers or amendments from the lenders.

The restrictions contained in our credit agreement could: (1) limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans; and (2) adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, strategic acquisitions, investments or other capital needs or to engage in other business activities that would be in our interest.

Our business could suffer if our ability to acquire financing is reduced or eliminated.

In the current economic environment, we cannot be assured that our borrowing relationship with our lender will continue or that our lender will remain able to support its commitments to us in the future. If our lender fails to do so, then we may not be able to secure alternative financing on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Our business could suffer as a result of small parcel delivery services such as United Parcel Service or Federal Express being unable to distribute our merchandise.

We rely upon small parcel delivery services for our product shipments, including shipments to, from and between our stores. Accordingly, we are subject to risks, including employee strikes and inclement weather, which may affect their ability to meet our shipping needs. Among other things, any circumstances that require us to use other delivery services for all or a portion of our shipments could result in increased costs and delayed deliveries and could harm our business materially. In addition, although we have contracts with small parcel delivery services, we and the service providers have the right to terminate these contracts upon 3030-90 days written notice. Although the contracts with these small parcel delivery services provide certain discounts from

the shipment rates in effect at the time of shipment, the contracts do not limit their ability to raise the shipment rates at any time. Accordingly, we are subject to the risk that small parcel delivery services may increase the rates they charge, that they may terminate their contracts with us, that they may decrease the rate discounts provided to us when an existing contract is renewed or that we may be unable to agree on the terms of a new contract with them, any of which could materially adversely affect our operating results.

Our business could suffer if a manufacturer fails to use acceptable labor practices.

We do not control our vendors or the manufacturers that produce the products we buy from them, nor do we control the labor practices of our vendors and these manufacturers. The violation of labor or other laws by any of our vendors or these manufacturers, or the divergence of the labor practices followed by any of our vendors or these manufacturers from those generally accepted as ethical in the United States, could interrupt, or otherwise disrupt, the shipment of finished products to us or damage our reputation. Any of these, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In that regard, most of the products sold in our stores are manufactured overseas, primarily in Asia and Central America, which may increase the risk that the labor practices followed by the manufacturers of these products may differ from those considered acceptable in the United States.

Additionally, our products are subject to regulation of and regulatory standards set by various governmental authorities with respect to quality and safety. Regulations and standards in this area are currently in place. These regulations and standards may change from time to time. Our inability to comply on a timely basis with regulatory requirements could result in significant fines or penalties, which could adversely affect our reputation and sales. Issues with the quality and safety of merchandise we sell in our stores, regardless of our culpability, or customer concerns about such issues, could result in damage to our reputation, lost sales, uninsured product liability claims or losses, merchandise recalls and increased costs.

Our failure to adequately anticipate a correct mix of private label merchandise may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Sales from private label merchandise accounted for 15.0%18% of our net sales in fiscal 2008.2010 and generally carries higher gross margins than our other merchandise. We may take steps to increase the percentage of net sales of private label merchandise in the future, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve increases in private label merchandise sales


Table of Contents


as a percentage of net sales. Because our private label merchandise generally carries higher gross margins than other merchandise, ourOur failure to anticipate, identify and react in a timely manner to fashion trends with our private label merchandise, would likely have a material adverse effect on our comparable store sales, financial condition and results of operations.

Most of our merchandise is produced by foreign manufacturers, therefore the availability and costs of these products may be negatively affected by risks associated with international trade and other international conditions.

        Most of our merchandise is produced by manufacturers around the world. Some of these facilities are located in regions that may be affected by natural disasters, political instability or other conditions that could cause a disruption in trade. Trade restrictions such as increased tariffs or quotas, or both, could also affect the importation of merchandise generally and increase the cost and reduce the supply of merchandise available to us. Any reduction in merchandise available to us or any increase in its cost due to tariffs, quotas or local issues that disrupt trade could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Although the prices charged by vendors for the merchandise we purchase are all denominated in United States dollars, a continued decline in the relative value of the United States dollar to foreign currencies could lead to increased merchandise costs, which could negatively affect our competitive position and our results of operation.

If our information systems hardware or software fails to function effectively or does not scale to keep pace with our planned growth, our operations could be disrupted and our financial results could be harmed.

Over the past several years, we have made improvements to our infrastructure and existing hardware and software systems, as well as implemented new systems. If these or any other information systems and software do not work effectively, this could adversely impact the promptness and accuracy of our transaction processing, financial accounting and reporting and our ability to manage our business and properly forecast operating results and cash requirements. To manage the anticipated growth of our operations and personnel, we may need to continue to improve our operational and financial systems, transaction processing, procedures and controls, and in doing so could incur substantial additional expenses that could impact our financial results.

Our inability or failure to protect our intellectual property or our infringement of other'sother’s intellectual property could have a negative impact on our operating results.

We believe that our trademarks and domain names are valuable assets that are critical to our success. The unauthorized use or other misappropriation of our trademarks or domain names could diminish the value of the

Zumiez brand, our store concept, our private label brands or our goodwill and cause a decline in our net sales. Although we have secured or are in the process of securing protection for our trademarks and domain names in a number of countries outside of the United States, there are certain countries where we do not currently have or where we do not currently intend to apply for protection for certain trademarks or at all. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our trademarks may not be sufficient or effective. Therefore, we may not be able to prevent other persons from using our trademarks or domain names outside of the United States, which also could adversely affect our business. We are also subject to the risk that we may infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties. Any infringement or other intellectual property claim made against us, whether or not it has merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product delays or require us to pay royalties or license fees. As a result, any such claim could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.


Table of Contents


The effects of war or acts of terrorism could adversely affect our business.

Substantially all of our stores are located in shopping malls. Any threat of terrorist attacks or actual terrorist events, particularly in public areas, could lead to lower customer traffic in shopping malls. In addition, local authorities or mall management could close shopping malls in response to security concerns. Mall closures, as well as lower customer traffic due to security concerns, would likely result in decreased sales. Additionally, the escalation of the armed conflicts in the Middle East, or the threat, escalation or commencement of war or other armed conflict elsewhere, could significantly diminish consumer spending, and result in decreased sales for us. Decreased sales would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, and may result in substantial costs and could divert management'smanagement’s attention.

We are involved, from time to time, in litigation incidental to our business including complaints filed by investors. This litigation could result in substantial costs, and could divert management'smanagement’s attention and resources, which could harm our business. Risks associated with legal liability are often difficult to assess or quantify, and their existence and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time. While we maintain director and officer insurance for litigation surrounding investor lawsuits, the amount of insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover a claim and the continued availability of this insurance cannot be assured. As a result,We also maintain other forms of insurance that have historically been adequate to address lawsuits; however, there can be no assurance that the actual outcome of pending or future litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our operations expose us to the risk of litigation, which could lead to significant potential liability and costs that could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We employ a substantial number of full-time and part-time employees, a majority of whom are employed at our store locations. As a result, we are subject to a large number of federal and state laws and regulations relating to employment. This creates a risk of potential claims that we have violated laws related to discrimination and harassment, health and safety, wage and hour laws, criminal activity, personal injury and other claims. We are also subject to other types of claims in the ordinary course of our business. Some or all of these claims may give rise to litigation, which could be time-consuming for our management team, costly and harmful to our business.

In addition, we are exposed to the risk of class action litigation. The costs of defense and the risk of loss in connection with class action suits are greater than in single-party litigation claims. Due to the costs of defending against such litigation, the size of judgments that may be awarded against us, and the loss of significant management time devoted to such litigation, we cannot assure you that such litigation will not disrupt our business or impact our financial results.

Our failure to comply with federal, state or local laws, or changes in these laws, could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial performance.

Our business is subject to a wide array of laws and regulations. Changes in the regulations, the imposition of additional regulations, or the enactment of any new legislation including those related to health care, taxes, environmental issues and trade, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Recent federal health care legislation could increase our expenses.

We are self-insured with respect to our health care coverage and do not purchase third party insurance for the health insurance benefits provided to employees with the exception of pre-defined stop loss, which helps limit the cost of large claims. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Act”) and the Health Care Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the “Reconciliation Act”) were signed into law. The Act, as modified by the Reconciliation Act, includes a large number of health care provisions to take effect over four years, including expanded dependent coverage, incentives for businesses to provide health care benefits, a prohibition on the denial of coverage and denial of claims on pre-existing conditions, a prohibition on limits on essential benefits and other expansions of health care benefits and coverage. The costs of these provisions are expected to be funded by a variety of taxes and fees. Some of the taxes and fees, as well as certain health care changes required by these acts, are expected to result, directly or indirectly, in increased health care costs for us. For example, the prohibition on limits on essential benefits (whereas we currently cap health-related benefits) could result in increased costs to us. At this time, we cannot quantify the impact, if any, that the legislation may have on us due to the changing regulatory environment around this legislation and due to the government’s requirement to issue future unknown regulatory rules. There is no assurance that we will be able to absorb and/or pass through the costs of such legislation in a manner that will not adversely impact our results of operations.

Our ecommerce operations subject us to numerous risks that could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Although ecommerce sales constitute a small, but increasing portion of our overall sales, our ecommerce operations subject us to certain risks that could have an adverse effect on our operational results, including:


Table of Contents

In addition, risks beyond our control, such as governmental regulation of the ecommerce, entry of our vendors in the ecommerce business in competition with us, online security breaches and general economic conditions specific to the ecommerce and online commerce could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We have incurred and will continue to incur significant expenses as a result of being a public company, which will negatively impact our financial performance.

We completed our initial public offering in May 2005 and we have incurred and willcould continue to incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses as a result of being a public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rulesRules and regulations implemented by Congress, the SEC and Thethe NASDAQ Global Select Market hashave required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. Compliance with these laws rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as discussed in the following risk factor, have caused and will continue tocould cause us to incur significant costs and expenses, including legal and accounting costs, and have made and will continue tocould make some compliance activities more time-consuming and costly. These laws,negatively impact our financial performance. Additionally, these rules and regulations have mademay make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we have been required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage.insurance. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as officers. As a result of the foregoing, we have incurred and we expect to incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and certain other expenses on an ongoing basis, which will negatively impact our financial performance and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to maintain adequate financial and management processes and controls could lead to errors in our financial reporting and could harm our ability to manage our expenses.

Reporting obligations as a public company and our anticipated growth are likely to place a considerable strain on our financial and management systems, processes and controls, as well as on our personnel. In addition, we are required to document and test our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 so that our management can certify as to the effectiveness of our internal controls and our independent registered public accounting firm can render an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis. This process requires us to document our internal controls over financial reporting and to potentially make significant changes thereto, if applicable. As a result, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses to test our financial controls and systems, and we have been and in the future may be required to improve our financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures, to incur substantial expenses to make such improvements and to hire additional personnel. If our management is ever unable to certify the effectiveness of our internal controls or if our independent registered public accounting firm cannot render an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, or if material weaknesses in our internal controls are ever identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of public confidence, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our stock price. In addition, if we do not maintain adequate financial and management personnel, processes and controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis, which could cause a decline in our stock price and adversely affect our ability to raise capital.

Changes to accounting rules or regulations could significantly affect our financial results.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). New accounting rules or regulations and changes to existing accounting rules or regulations have occurred and may occur in the future. Future changes to accounting rules or regulations, such as changes to lease accounting guidance or a requirement to convert to international financial reporting standards, could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition through increased cost of compliance.

The security of our databases that contain personal information of our retail customers could be breached, which could subject us to adverse publicity, litigation and expenses. In addition, if we are unable to comply with security standards created by the credit card industry, our operations could be adversely affected.

Database privacy, network security and identity theft are matters of growing public concern. In an attempt to prevent unauthorized access to our network and databases containing confidential, third-


Table of Contents


partythird-party information, we have installed privacy protection systems, devices and activity monitoring on our network. Nevertheless, if unauthorized parties gain access to our networks or databases, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify our private and sensitive third-party information. In such circumstances, we could be held liable to our customers or other parties or be subject to regulatory or other actions for breaching privacy rules. This could result in costly investigations and litigation, civil or criminal penalties and adverse publicity that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and reputation. Further, if we are unable to comply with the security standards established by banks and the credit card industry, we may be subject to fines, restrictions and expulsion from card acceptance programs, which could adversely affect our retail operations.

The current uncertainty surrounding the United States economy coupled with cyclical economic trends in action sports retailing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

        The action sports retail industry historically has been subject to substantial cyclicality. As economic conditions in the United States change, the trends in discretionary consumer spending become unpredictable and discretionary consumer spending could be reduced due to uncertainties about the future. When discretionary consumer spending is reduced, purchases of action sports apparel and related products may decline. A recession in the general economy or continued uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may fail to meet analyst expectations, which could cause the price of our stock to decline.

Our common stock is traded publicly and various securities analysts follow our financial results and issue reports on us. These reports include information about our historical financial results as well as the analysts'analysts’ estimates of our future performance. The analysts'analysts’ estimates are based upon their own independent opinions and are oftencan be different from our estimates or expectations. If our operating results are below the estimates or expectations of public market analysts and investors, our stock price could decline. In December 2007, a

securities class action litigation and associated derivative lawsuits was brought against us and such actions are frequently brought against other companies following a decline in the market price of their securities. These lawsuits were dismissed with prejudice in March 2009. If our stock price is volatile, we may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Any litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management'smanagement’s attention and resources that are needed to successfully run our business.

The trading pricevalue of our investment in marketable securitiesinvestments may fluctuate.

We have our excess cash primarily invested in diversified high credit money market accounts, US treasuries, certificates of deposit,state and local municipal bondssecurities, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Agency securities and auction rate securities. Thevariable-rate demand notes. These investments have historically been considered very safe investments with very minimal default rates. However,At January 29, 2011, we had $114.6 million of investments in state and local government securities and variable-rate demand notes, excluding our auction rate security. These securities are not guaranteed by the recentUnited States government and are subject to additional credit risk based upon each local municipality’s tax revenues and financial stability. As a result, we may experience a reduction in value or loss of liquidity of our investments, which may have a negative adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

The uncertainties in the credit markets have prevented us and other investors from liquidating holdings of auction rate securities in recent auctions for these securities because the amount of securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. We reduced our holdings of auction rate securities during fiscal 2007 through the auction process. As ofAt January 31, 2009,29, 2011, we had $1.8$0.9 million, net of $0.2$0.1 million temporary impairment, invested in an auction rate securitiessecurity that are classified asis included in long-term marketable securitiesinvestments on ourthe consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended January 31, 2009, we incurred a temporary impairment charge on these investments of approximately $0.2 million recorded in other comprehensive income. If market liquidity issues continue, weWe may incur additional impairment charges on these investments.this investment in the future.

In addition, we made a $2.0 million equity investment in a manufacturer and expect the value of this investment to increase. However, we do not have control over this investment and it may encounter unanticipated operating issues or negative financial performance that could adversely impact the value of our investment.

A decline in the market price of our stock and performance of our Companyperformance may trigger an impairment of the goodwill recorded on ourthe consolidated balance sheet.sheets.

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives mustis required to be tested for impairment at least once a yearannually or more frequently if management believes indicators of impairment exist. The Company


Table of Contents


evaluates the recoverability of goodwill annually based on a two-step impairment test. The first step compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. Any reduction in the carrying value of our goodwill as a result of our impairment analysis could result in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge to our statement of operations. A goodwill impairment charge could have a significant impact on earnings and potentially result in a violation of our financial covenants, thereby limiting our ability to secure short termshort-term financing.

Changes to estimates related to our property and equipment,fixed assets, or operating results that are lower than our current estimates at certain store locations, may cause us to incur non-cash impairment charges.

We make certain estimates and projections in connection with impairment analyses for certain of our store locations and other property and equipment in accordance with "Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." For example, we review for impairment all stores for which current cash flows from operations are either negative or nominal. Recoverability of store assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount is higher, impairment loss is measured by the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows.equipment. These calculations require us to make a number of estimates and projections of future results. If these estimates or projections change or prove incorrect, we may be and have been, required to record impairment charges on certain store locations and other property and equipment. If these impairment charges are significant, our operating results would be adversely affected and our bank covenants may be violated.

Our business could suffer if our ability to acquire financing is reduced or eliminated.

        In the current economic environment, we cannot be assured that our borrowing relationship with our lender will continue or that our lender will remain able to support its commitments to us in the future. If our lender fails to do so, then we may not be able to secure alternative financing on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Item 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 None.

Item 2.    PROPERTIES
PROPERTIES

All of our stores, primarily located in shopping malls and encompassing approximately 1,174,000 total square feet at January 29, 2011, are occupied under operating leases.

        In early February 2005, we completed our move from the 49,000 square foot combined home office and distribution center that we occupied since 1994 to a new

We lease an 87,350 square foot combined home office and distributionecommerce fulfillment center both in Everett, Washington. This lease expires in 2017.

In October, 2006fiscal 2010, we entered intoacquired a new lease agreement whereby168,450 square foot building in Corona, California that serves as our warehouse and distribution facility. Additionally, in fiscal 2010, we agreed to expand our existing lease of 87,350acquired approximately 253,500 square feet of land in Lynnwood, Washington, which we plan to use as the location of our new home office and distribution center space by 37,350 square feet, bringing the aggregate square footage leased to 124,700 square feet effective January 1, 2007. The new lease agreement terminated and replaced the original February 2005 lease with the landlord. The new lease agreement provides for an initial lease term of 126 months within which we have an option to extend the lease term for an additional period of five years.starting in 2012.

 All of our stores, encompassing approximately 1,005,000 total square feet as of January 31, 2009 are occupied under operating leases. The store leases range for a term of five to ten years and we are generally responsible for payment of property taxes and utilities, common area maintenance and marketing fees.


Table of Contents

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to our business. We believe that the outcome of current litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

See Note 109 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in Part IV Item 8 of Part II15 of this Form 10-K (listed under "Litigation"“Litigation” under Commitments and Contingencies).

Item 4.(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

Item 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II

 No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter ended January 31, 2009.


PART II

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Item 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

a)    Market Information

Our common stock has traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "ZUMZ." As of“ZUMZ.” At January 31, 200929, 2011, there were 29,533,06730,834,713 shares of common stock issued. We began trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market on May 6, 2005. Accordingly, no information prior to this date is available.outstanding. The following table sets forth the April 20, 2006 stock split adjusted high and low last reported sales prices for our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2010

  High   Low 

First Fiscal Quarter (January 31, 2010—May 1, 2010)

  $22.53    $12.54  

Second Fiscal Quarter (May 2, 2010—July 31, 2010)

  $19.79    $14.98  

Third Fiscal Quarter (August 1, 2010—October 30, 2010)

  $26.45    $14.44  

Fourth Fiscal Quarter (October 31, 2010—January 29, 2011)

  $33.13    $22.24  

Fiscal 2009

  High   Low 

First Fiscal Quarter (February 1, 2009—May 2, 2009)

  $13.07    $5.70  

Second Fiscal Quarter (May 3, 2009—August 1, 2009)

  $12.86    $7.27  

Third Fiscal Quarter (August 2, 2009—October 31, 2009)

  $17.43    $9.25  

Fourth Fiscal Quarter (November 1, 2009—January 30, 2010)

  $15.74    $10.68  

Performance Measurement Comparison

The following graph shows a comparison for total cumulative returns for Zumiez Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index and the fiscal years ended February 2, 2008NASDAQ Retail Trade Index during the period commencing on January 28, 2006 and ending on January 31, 2009.29, 2011. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on January 28, 2006 in each Zumiez, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index, and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends, if any. The comparison in the following graph and table is required by the SEC and is not intended to be a forecast or to be indicative of future Company common stock performance.

Fiscal 2007
 High Low 

First Fiscal Quarter (February 4, 2007—May 5, 2007)

 $42.00 $31.57 

Second Fiscal Quarter (May 6, 2007—August 4, 2007)

 $41.80 $35.77 

Third Fiscal Quarter (August 5, 2007—November 3, 2007)

 $51.25 $37.96 

Fourth Fiscal Quarter (November 4, 2007—February 2, 2008)

 $39.45 $15.59 

   1/28/06   2/3/07   2/2/08   1/31/09   1/30/10   1/29/11 

Zumiez Inc.

   100.00     136.16     81.02     28.91     51.47     90.20  

NASDAQ Composite

   100.00     109.00     107.45     66.46     97.13     123.13  

NASDAQ Retail Trade

   100.00     103.41     111.20     75.42     127.28     168.13  


Fiscal 2008
 High Low 

First Fiscal Quarter (February 3, 2008—May 3, 2008)

 $22.76 $13.84 

Second Fiscal Quarter (May 4, 2008—August 2, 2008)

 $22.33 $12.29 

Third Fiscal Quarter (August 3, 2008—November 1, 2008)

 $18.25 $8.72 

Fourth Fiscal Quarter (November 2, 2008—January 31, 2009)

 $9.72 $6.12 

b)    Holders of the Corporation'sCorporation’s Capital Stock

We had approximately 182356 shareholders of record as of March 19, 2009.7, 2011.

c)     Dividends

No cash dividends have been declared on our common stock to date nor have any decisions been made to pay a dividend in the foreseeable future. Payment of dividends is evaluated on a periodic basis and if a dividend were paid, it would be subject to covenants of our lending facility, which may have the effect of restricting our ability to pay dividends.

d)    Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


Table of Contents

e)     Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period

  Total Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
   Average Price
Paid per Share
   Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly

Announced Plans or
Programs
   Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under

the Plans or
Programs
 

October 31, 2010—November 27, 2010

   —      $—       —       —    

November 28, 2010—January 1, 2011

   134    $29.32     —       —    

January 2, 2011—January 29, 2011

   77    $22.31     —       —    
              

Total

   211       —       —    
              

(1)During the thirteen weeks ended January 29, 2011, 211 shares were either forfeited or purchased by us in order to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock. These shares were not acquired pursuant to any publicly announced purchase plan or program.

Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following selected consolidated financial information has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, and Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere herein.

 Each fiscal year consists of four 13-week quarters, with an extra week added to the fourth quarter every five or six years. Our fiscal years ended, January 29, 2005, January 28, 2006, and February 2, 2008 and January 31, 2009 each consisted of 52 weeks. Our fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 consisted of 53 weeks. In this document, we refer to the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 as "fiscal 2004", to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 as "fiscal 2005", to the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 as "fiscal 2006", the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008 as "fiscal 2007" and the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 as "fiscal 2008".

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
   January 31,
2009
   February 2,
2008
   February 3,
2007 (1)
 
   (in thousands, except per share data) 

Statement of Operations Data:

         

Net sales

  $478,849   $407,603    $408,669    $381,416    $298,177  

Cost of goods sold

   308,452    272,865     274,134     244,429     189,959  
                        

Gross profit

   170,397    134,738     134,535     136,987     108,218  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   133,030    122,003     109,927     98,042     75,774  
                        

Operating profit

   37,367    12,735     24,608     38,945     32,444  

Interest income, net

   1,496    1,176     2,059     1,722     1,178  

Other (expense) income, net

   (8  96     36     3     (16
                        

Earnings before income taxes

   38,855    14,007     26,703     40,670     33,606  

Provision for income taxes

   14,652    4,876     9,499     15,344     12,750  
                        

Net income

  $24,203   $9,131    $17,204    $25,326    $20,856  
                        

Earnings per share:

         

Basic

  $0.81   $0.31    $0.59    $0.89    $0.76  
                        

Diluted

  $0.79   $0.30    $0.58    $0.86    $0.73  
                        

Weighted average shares outstanding:

         

Basic

   29,971    29,499     29,127     28,609     27,543  

Diluted

   30,794    30,133     29,694     29,322     28,703  

(1)The fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 consisted of 53 weeks.

        The selected statement of operations data for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008 and the selected balance sheet data as of February 2, 2008 and January 31, 2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this document. The selected consolidated statement of operations data for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005 are derived from our audited financial statements not included in this document.

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 January 29,
2005
 January 28,
2006
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 
 
 (in thousands, except share and per share data)
 

Statement of Operations Data:

                

Net sales

 $153,583 $205,589 $298,177 $381,416 $408,669 

Cost of goods sold

  103,297  133,047  189,959  244,429  274,134 
            

Gross profit

  50,286  72,542  108,218  136,987  134,535 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  38,277  52,494  75,774  98,042  109,927 
            

Operating profit

  12,009  20,048  32,444  38,945  24,608 

Interest income (expense)

  (250) 648  1,178  1,722  2,059 

Other income (expense)

  8  (1) (16) 3  36 
            

Earnings before income taxes

  11,767  20,695  33,606  40,670  26,703 

Provision for income taxes

  4,500  7,844  12,750  15,344  9,499 
            

Net income

 $7,267 $12,851 $20,856 $25,326 $17,204 
            

Net income per share:

                

Basic (1)

 $0.32 $0.50 $0.76 $0.89 $0.59 
            

Diluted (1)

 $0.28 $0.47 $0.73 $0.86 $0.58 
            

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                

Basic (1)

  22,610,522  25,879,675  27,542,891  28,608,818  29,126,889 

Diluted (1)

  25,877,716  27,376,684  28,703,037  29,322,337  29,694,112 

(1)
Fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005 have been restated to reflect the 2 for 1 stock split that occurred in fiscal 2006 in the form of a share dividend.

Table of Contents


 Fiscal Year Ended 

 January 29,
2005
 January 28,
2006
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
   January 29,
2011
   January 30,
2010
   January 31,
2009
   February 2,
2008
   February 3,
2007
 

 (in thousands)
   (in thousands) 

Balance Sheet Data:

           

Cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities

 $1,026 $43,001 $51,977 $76,532 $78,582   $128,801    $108,051    $78,582    $76,532    $51,977  

Working capital

 4,756 47,357 54,929 92,161 112,092 

Working capital (1)

   155,400     133,927     112,092     92,161     54,929  

Total assets

 54,811 114,411 167,294 216,095 233,349    301,631     260,265     233,349     216,095     167,294  

Total long term obligations

 5,576 9,129 12,910 18,097 24,177 

Total shareholders' equity

 25,799 73,684 104,812 154,602 177,951 

Total long-term liabilities

   29,435     27,802     24,177     18,097     12,910  

Total shareholders’ equity

   226,735     192,676     177,951     154,602     104,812  

 

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 January 29,
2005
 January 28,
2006
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 
 
 (in thousands, except square footage & sales per square foot)
 

Other Financial Data:

                

Gross margin percentage (1)

  32.7% 35.3% 36.3% 35.9% 32.9%

Capital expenditures

 $12,754 $16,453 $22,160 $30,722 $28,349 

Depreciation and Amortization

 $5,857 $7,535 $10,499 $14,762 $19,470 

Store Data:

                

Number of stores open at end of period

  140  174  235  285  343 

Comparable store sales increase (decrease) (2) (3)

  9.6% 14.2% 14.5% 9.2% (6.5%)

Net sales per store (4)

 $1,183 $1,299 $1,389 $1,405 $1,240 

Total square footage at end of period (5)

  371,864  475,646  667,337  829,021  1,004,868 

Average square footage per store at end of period (6)

  2,656  2,718  2,840  2,909  2,930 

Net sales per square foot (7) (8)

 $452 $483 $499 $488 $424 

(1)
Gross margin percentage represents gross profit divided by net sales.

(2)
Comparable store sales percentage changes are calculated by comparing comparable store sales for the applicable fiscal year to comparable store sales for the prior fiscal year. Comparable store sales are based on net sales, and stores are considered comparable beginning on the first anniversary of their first day of operation. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—General" for more information about how we compute comparable store sales. Comparable stores sales for fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005 consisted of 52 weeks and February 3, 2004 consisted of 53 weeks, resulting in an extra week of sales in fiscal 2006.

(3)
Comparable store sales, and net sales per store include our in-store sales and our ecommerce sales. Fiscal 2006 included an extra week of sales due to the addition of a 53rd week.

(4)
Net sales per store represents net sales for the period divided by the average number of stores open during the period. For purposes of this calculation, the average number of stores open during the period is equal to the sum of the number of stores open as of the end of each month during the period divided by the number of months in the period. Fiscal 2006 included an extra week of sales due to the addition of a 53rd week.

(5)
Total square footage at end of period includes retail selling, storage and back office space.

(6)
Average square footage per store at end of period is calculated on the basis of the total square footage at end of period, including retail selling, storage and back office space, of all stores open

(1)Working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. The fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 has been restated to account for the reclassification of certain assets from current assets to long-term assets. Reclassification of these assets from current assets to long-term assets is immaterial for prior periods.

Table of Contents

(7)
Net sales per square foot represents net sales, excluding ecommerce sales, for the period divided by the average square footage of stores open during the period. For purposes of this calculation, the average square footage of stores open during the period is equal to the sum of the total square footage of the stores open as of the end of each month during the period divided by the number of months in the period. This calculation excludes our ecommerce sales.

(8)
The fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 28, 2006, February 3, 2007 and February 2, 2008 have been restated to exclude sales related to our ecommerce sales.
(1)The fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 consisted of 53 weeks.

(2)Gross margin represents gross profit divided by net sales.

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
  January 31,
2009
  February 2,
2008
  February 3,
2007 (1)
 

Store Data:

      

Number of stores open at end of period

   400    377    343    285    235  

Comparable store sales increase (decrease) (2)

   11.9  (10.0%)   (6.5%)   9.2  14.5

Net sales per store (3) (in thousands)

  $1,162   $1,081   $1,240   $1,405   $1,389  

Total square footage at end of period (4) (in thousands)

   1,174    1,107    1,005    829    667  

Average square footage per store at end of period (5)

   2,935    2,937    2,930    2,909    2,840  

Net sales per square foot (6)

  $396   $367   $424   $488   $499  

(1)The fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 consisted of 53 weeks.

(2)Comparable store sales percentage changes are calculated by comparing comparable store sales for the applicable fiscal year to comparable store sales for the prior fiscal year. Comparable store sales are based on net sales, and stores are considered comparable beginning on the first anniversary of their first day of operation. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—General” for more information about how we compute comparable store sales. Comparable store sales include our ecommerce sales.

(3)Net sales per store represents net sales for the period divided by the average number of stores open during the period. For purposes of this calculation, the average number of stores open during the period is equal to the sum of the number of stores open as of the end of each month during the period divided by the number of months in the period. Net sales per store excludes ecommerce sales.

(4)Total square footage at end of period includes retail selling, storage and back office space.

(5)Average square footage per store at the end of a period is calculated based on the total store square footage at end of period, including retail selling, storage and back office space, of all stores open at the end of the period.

(6)Net sales per square foot represents net sales, excluding ecommerce sales, for the period divided by the average square footage of stores open during the period. For purposes of this calculation, the average square footage of stores open during the period is equal to the sum of the total square footage of the stores open as of the end of each month during the period divided by the number of months in the period.

Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Item 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed in "Item“Item 1A Risk Factors".Factors.” See the cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements set forth at the beginning of Part I of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a mall based specialty retailer of action sports related apparel, footwear, equipment and accessories operating under the Zumiez brand name. As ofAt January 31, 200929, 2011, we operated 343400 stores primarily located in shopping malls, giving us a presence in 3137 states. Our stores cater to young men and women between the ages of 12 and 24 who seek popular brands representing a lifestyle centered on activities that include skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, BMX and motocross. We support the action sports lifestyle and promote our brand through a multi-faceted marketing approach that is designed to integrate our brand image with our customers'customers’ activities and interests. This approach, combined with our differentiated merchandising strategy, store design, comprehensive training programs and passionate employees, allows us to provide an experience for our customers that we believe is consistent with their attitudes, fashion tastes and identities and is otherwise unavailable in most malls. Accordingly, our success is largely dependent upon our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to the fashion tastes of our customers and to provide merchandise that satisfies customer demands.

        Fiscal 2008 wasZumiez’ financial results in fiscal 2010 meaningfully exceeded our own projections and these results were significant, particularly when viewing against the teen retail landscape in what remained a difficult year for Zumiez. Whiletenuous consumer environment. In addition, while accomplishing these results, we made strategic investments that we believe will reap long-term benefits focused on enhancing the first half of the year was challenging, the second half of the year saw a marked deterioration in the U.S. economy that negatively impactedcustomer experience across multiple sales channels, and on our people and infrastructure aimed at improving decision making and product speed to market. The table below show net sales, operating profit and financial results. Historically, we have made the majority of our profits in the second half of the year due to the seasonal nature of our business, so as the recession became more severe in the second half of fiscal 2008, our salesmargin and profits were proportionally worse. As the economy worsened, we saw declines in traffic in our stores and more promotional activity from our competitors. Through the first six months of fiscal 2008, our same store sales decreased 1.3% and our diluted earnings per share declined $0.02 or 12.5%.growth for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010  % Change 

Net sales (in thousands)

  $478,849   $407,603    17

Operating profit (in thousands)

  $37,367   $12,735    193

Operating margin

   7.8  3.1 

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.79   $0.30    163

Our sales results were primarily driven by an increase in transactions, which is a testament to our differentiated product offering and the unique customer experience our store associates provide. The second half ofstrong sales results we realized in fiscal 2008, the six months ended January 31, 2009, our same store sales declined 10.0%2010 translated to a significant increase in operating income, operating margin and our diluted earnings per share declined $0.26 or 37.1%.compared to fiscal 2009 due to our unique business model and focus on managing our cost structure.


Table of Contents

        We expectWhile the upcomingmomentum we have seen throughout fiscal year to be very challenging2010 would suggest that discretionary spending is increasing, unemployment, debt and believe ithousing remain concerns and the economy is difficult to predict the effects the unprecedented global financial and economic crises willstill in recovery. In addition, other challenges have surfaced as we look out into fiscal 2011, most notably increases in production costs that may have an impact on our financial performance. As mentioned aboveability to maintain product margins. Considering these factors, our results worsened as fiscal 2008 progressedcurrent outlook is cautiously optimistic, and we believe our results will continue to be below those obtained in fiscal 2008 for at least the first six months of fiscal 2009. We are planning ourthe business conservatively for fiscal 2009, which includes lower purchases2011.

For the year, we expect total sales to increase driven by an increase in comparable store sales, the opening of inventory based on anticipated continued soft sales demand, lower capital expenditures due to fewerapproximately 44 new stores, including our first stores in Canada, and controlled selling, generalincreased sales from our ecommerce channel. If we achieve our sales projections, we expect earnings will increase in fiscal 2011. We will make further investments in people and administrative expenditures. Our current forecast projects sustainedinfrastructure in fiscal 2011, building on the progress we have made through fiscal 2010, primarily focused on the development of our multi-channel sales strategies, expansion into Canada and continued progress on our product assortment planning and supply chain solutions and a capital investment related to building a new home office, planned to opening in the spring of 2011. We expect our cash, short-term investments and working capital similar to previous years, adequate cashincrease, and investments, nodo not anticipate any borrowings on our credit facility and positive cash flow from operations. We believe our earnings will be below fiscal 2008 if our same store sales decline.

        Our net salesfacility. Inventory levels per square foot are expected to grow due to increased from approximately $117.9 million in fiscal 2003 to approximately $408.7 million in fiscal 2008, a compound annual growth rate of 28.2%. Net sales for fiscal 2008 increased by $27.3 million, or 7.1%, over net sales for fiscal 2007. Over the past five fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 we increased our store base from 113 to 343 and our comparable store net sales increased an average of 7.9% per fiscal year. As of January 31, 2009 we operated 343 stores that averaged approximately 2,900 square feet per store.

        We intend to expand our presence as a leading action sports lifestyle retailer by opening new stores and continuing to generate sales growth through improved store level productivity. We have successfully and consistently implemented our store concept across a variety of mall classifications and geographic locations, and our strategy is to continue to open stores in both new and existing markets. We plan to open approximately 37 new stores in fiscal 2009production costs and to continue to open a significant number of new stores in future years. Unlike previous years, the number of anticipated store openings in fiscal 2009 may increase or decrease due to market conditions. We have opened or acquired, on average, approximately twenty-five percent new stores over each of the last five years. As we look to fiscal 2009 and beyond, we will likely slow this rate of growth until we see the macroeconomic environment improve. Through our merchandising and marketing efforts, we have historically been successful in increasing the level of netsupport sales in our existing stores and we will seek to continue such increases going forward.growth.

        We believe that we have developed an economically compelling store model. Our new stores opened during fiscal 2007, generated average net sales of approximately $1.0 million during their first full year of operations. On average, our net capital investment to open these stores, was approximately $330,000 per store, which includes capital expenditures, net of landlord contributions. However, net sales and other operating results for stores that we open or have opened subsequent to the end of fiscal 2007, as well as our net capital investment to open those stores, may differ substantially from net sales and other operating results and our net capital investment for stores we opened in fiscal 2007. See "Business—Stores." However our capital investment, net of landlord contributions, to open new stores and net sales generated by new stores vary significantly and depend on a number of factors, including the geographic location, type of mall and size of those stores. Accordingly, net sales and other operating results for stores that we open or have opened subsequent to the end of fiscal 2008, as well as our net capital investment to open those stores, may differ substantially from net sales and other operating results and our net capital investment for the stores we opened in prior years. We opened 58 new stores in fiscal 2008 with an average net capital investment of approximately $311,000 per store, which includes capital expenditures, net of landlord contributions. In addition to capital investments, we make working capital investments consisting primarily of merchandise inventory.

        In any given period, our overall gross margin may be impacted by changes in the margins of the various products we offer as well as changes in the relative mix of revenues from the different categories of apparel and hardgood products that we sell. Over the past five fiscal years, our annual


Table of Contents


gross margin as a percentage of our net sales has ranged from a low of 32.7% to a high of 36.3%. A number of other factors may positively or negatively impact our gross margins and results of operations, including, but not limited to:

General

Net sales constitute gross sales net of returns.actual and estimated returns and deductions for promotions. Net sales include our in-store sales and our ecommerce sales, which includes ecommerce shipping revenuerevenue. Ecommerce sales were 4.7%, 2.5% and accordingly, information in this report with respect to comparable store sales, includes our ecommerce sales. For fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2007, ecommerce sales represented approximately 1%1.7% of our net sales and 1.5% oftotal net sales for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008. We record the saleSales of gift cards as a current liabilityare deferred and recognize a salerecognized when a customer redeems a gift card.cards are redeemed. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered ("(“gift card breakage"breakage”). Gift card breakage is recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data.

We report "comparable“comparable store sales"sales” based on net sales, and stores are included in our comparable store sales beginning on the first anniversary of theirthe first day of operation.operation of a new store. Our comparable store sales also include our ecommerce sales. Changes in our comparable store sales between two periods are based on net sales of stores which were in operation during both of the two periods being compared and, if a store is included in the calculation of comparable store sales for only a portion of one of the two periods being compared, then that store is included in the calculation for only the comparable portion of the other period. When additionalAny change in square footage is added to a store that is included inof an existing comparable store, sales,including remodels, does not eliminate that store remainsfrom inclusion in the calculation of comparable store sales. There may be variations in the way in which some of our competitors and other apparel retailers calculate comparable or same store sales. As a result, data herein regarding our comparable store sales may not be comparable to similar data made available by our competitors or other retailers.

Cost of goods sold consists of thebranded merchandise costs and our private label merchandise costs including design, sourcing, importing and inbound freight costs. Our cost of merchandisegoods sold to customers, inbound shipping costs, ecommerce shipping costs,also includes shrinkage and buying, occupancy, distribution costs, depreciation on leasehold improvements at the distribution center, buying and merchandising costs and store occupancywarehousing costs. This may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their cost of goods sold. We receive cash consideration from vendors, which have been reported as a reduction cost of goods sold if the inventory has sold, as a reduction of the carrying value of the inventory if the inventory is still on hand, or a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense if the amounts are reimbursements of specific, incremental and identifiable costs of selling the vendors’ products.

With respect to the freight component of our ecommerce sales, we arrange and pay the freight for our customers and bill them for this service, unless our customers have their product shipped to one of our stores or we have free shipping promotions to our customers, in which case we do not bill our customers. Such amounts billed are included in net sales and the related freight cost is charged to cost of goods sold.

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of store personnel wages and benefits, administrative staff and infrastructure expenses, outbound freight, store supplies, depreciation on leasehold improvementsfixed assets at our home office and stores, facility expenses and training, advertising and marketing costs. Credit card fees, insurance, public company expenses, Sarbanes Oxley compliancelegal expenses stock based compensation and other miscellaneous operating costs are also included in selling, general and


Table of Contents


administrative expenses. This may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their selling, general and administrative expenses. We expect that our selling, general and administrative expenses will, as described below, increase in future periods due in part to increased expenses associated with opening new stores.

        Our success is largely dependent upon our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to the fashion tastes of our customers and to provide merchandise that satisfies customer demands. Any inability to provide appropriate merchandise in sufficient quantities in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Key Performance Indicators

Our management evaluates the following items, which we consider key performance indicators, in assessing our performance:

Comparable store sales.    Comparable As previously described in detail under the caption “General,” comparable store sales provide a measure of sales growth for stores open at least one year over the comparable prior year period.

        Our management considersWe consider comparable store sales to be an important indicator of our current performance. Comparable store sales results are important to achieve leveraging of our costs, including store payroll, store supplies and rent. Comparable store sales also have a direct impact on our total net sales, cash and working capital.

Gross profit.profit. Gross profit measures whether we are optimizing the price and inventory levels of our merchandise. Gross profit is the difference between net sales and cost of sales. Cost of sales consists of branded merchandise costs, and our private label merchandise including design, sourcing, importing and inbound freight costs. Our cost of sales also includes markdowns, shrinkage, certain promotional costs and buying, store occupancy and warehousing costs.goods sold. Any inability to obtain acceptable levels of initial markups or any significant increase in our use of markdowns could have an adverse effect on our gross profit and results of operations.

Operating income.profit.We view operating incomeprofit as a key indicator of our success. The key drivers of operating incomeprofit are comparable store sales, gross profit, our ability to control selling, general and administrative expenses and our level of capital expenditures affecting depreciation expense.

Store productivity.    Store productivity, including net sales per average square foot, average unit retail price, the number of transactions per store, the number of units sold per store and the number of units per transaction, is evaluated by our management in assessing our operational performance. In addition, weWe review our storesstores’ operating incomeprofit as a measure of their profitability.


TableCritical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. In connection with the preparation of Contentsour consolidated financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part IV Item 15, “Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statements,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Description

Judgments and Uncertainties

Effect If Actual Results Differ
From Assumptions

Valuation of Merchandise Inventories

We value our inventory at the lower of cost or fair market value through the establishment of write-down and inventory loss reserves.

Our write-down reserve represents the excess of the carrying value over the amount we expect to realize from the ultimate sales or other disposal of the inventory. Write-downs establish a new cost basis for our inventory. Subsequent changes in facts or circumstances do not result in the restoration of previously recorded write-downs or an increase in that newly established cost basis.

Our inventory loss reserve represents anticipated physical inventory losses (“shrinkage reserve”) that have occurred since the last physical inventory dates. Each quarter, we reserve for anticipated physical inventory losses on an aggregate basis.

Our write-down reserve contains uncertainties because the calculation requires management to make assumptions based on the current rate of sales, the age of inventory, the profitability of the inventory and other factors.

Our inventory loss reserve contains uncertainties because the calculation requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding a number of factors, including historical percentages that can be affected by changes in merchandise mix and changes in actual shrinkage trends.

We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to calculate our write-down and inventory loss reserves in the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our inventory reserves. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

A 10% decrease in ultimate sales price at January 29, 2011 would have affected net income by $0.1 million in fiscal 2010.

A 10% difference in actual physical inventory shrinkage reserved at January 29, 2011 would have affected net income by $0.3 million in fiscal 2010.

Fixed Assets

We review the carrying value of our fixed assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such asset may not be recoverable.

Recoverability of assets to be held and used is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by comparing projected individual store discounted cash flow to the asset carrying values. Declines in projected store cash flow could result in the impairment of assets.

The actual economic lives of our fixed assets may be different from our estimated useful lives, thereby resulting in a different carrying value. These evaluations could result in a change in the depreciable lives of these assets and therefore our depreciation expense in future periods.

Our impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including forecasting future sales, gross profit and operating expenses and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.

Our fixed assets accounting methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make estimates with respect to the useful lives of our fixed assets that we believe are reasonable.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-lived asset impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Although management believes that the current useful lives estimates assigned to our fixed assets are reasonable, factors could cause us to change our estimates, thus affecting the future calculation of depreciation.

Description

Judgments and Uncertainties

Effect If Actual Results Differ
From Assumptions

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized upon purchase at our retail store locations. For orders placed through our website, revenue is recognized upon estimated delivery to the customer. Revenue is recorded net of estimated and actual sales returns and deductions for promotions.

Revenue is not recorded on the sale of gift cards. A current liability is recorded upon sale, and revenue is recognized when the gift card is redeemed for merchandise. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered (“gift card breakage”). Gift card breakage is recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data.

Our revenue recognition accounting methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions regarding future sales returns and the amount and timing of gift cards projected to be redeemed by gift card recipients. Our estimate of the amount and timing of sales returns and gift cards to be redeemed is based primarily on historical transaction experience.

We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to measure sales returns or recognize revenue for our gift card program in the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to recognize revenue. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

A 10% change in our sales return reserve at January 29, 2011 would have affected net income by less than $0.1 million in fiscal 2010.

A 10% change in our unredeemed gift card breakage life at January 29, 2011 would have affected net income by $0.2 million in fiscal 2010.

Stock-Based Compensation

We maintain the Zumiez Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan under which non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to employees and non-employee directors.

In determining the fair value of our stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires management to apply judgment and make assumptions to determine the fair value of our awards.

We determine the fair value of our restricted stock awards based on the closing market price of our stock on the grant date.

The calculation of stock-based compensation requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the inputs to the Black-Scholes option pricing model, future employee turnover rates and future employee stock option exercise behaviors. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material.

A 10% change in our stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2010 would have affected net income by $0.3 million in fiscal 2010.

Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing the financial statements, income taxes are estimated for each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included on the consolidated balance sheets.Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations.

Although management believes that the income tax related judgments and estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

Upon income tax audit, any unfavorable tax settlement generally would require use of our cash and may result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement may be recognized as a reduction in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.

Description

Judgments and Uncertainties

Effect If Actual Results Differ
From Assumptions

Accounting for Contingencies
We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits, insurance, regulatory and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. We accrue a liability if the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount is estimable. If the likelihood of an adverse outcome is only reasonably possible (as opposed to probable), or if an estimate is not determinable, we provide disclosure of a material claim or contingency in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Significant judgment is required in evaluating our claims and contingencies, including determining the probability that a liability has been incurred and whether such liability is reasonably estimable. The estimated accruals for claims and contingencies are made based on the best information available, which can be highly subjective.Although management believes that the contingencies related judgments and estimates are reasonable, our accrual for claims and contingencies could fluctuate as additional information becomes known, thereby creating variability in our results of operations from period to period. Additionally, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.
Goodwill

We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change to suggest that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We complete our impairment evaluation by performing internal valuation analyses, considering other publicly available market information, and where appropriate, by use of an independent valuation firm.

We test goodwill for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of net assets to the fair value of the related operations. If the fair value is determined to be less than carrying value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of impairment. We estimate fair value using discounted cash flows.

Forecasts of future cash flow are based on our best estimate of future net sales and operating expenses. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate economic factors and the profitability of future business operations.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to test for impairment losses on goodwill. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.

A 10% decrease in the fair value of the Company at January 29, 2011 would have no impact on the carrying value of goodwill.

Results of Operations

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected items in the consolidated statements of operations as a percent of net sales:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Net sales

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of goods sold

  63.7% 64.1% 67.1%
        

Gross margin

  36.3% 35.9% 32.9%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  25.4% 25.7% 26.9%
        

Operating profit

  10.9% 10.2% 6.0%

Interest income (expense)

  0.4% 0.4% 0.5%
        

Earnings before income taxes

  11.3% 10.6% 6.5%

Provision for income taxes

  4.3% 4.0% 2.3%
        

Net income

  7.0% 6.6% 4.2%
        

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
  January 31,
2009
 

Net sales

   100.0  100.0  100.0

Cost of goods sold

   64.4  66.9  67.1
             

Gross profit

   35.6  33.1  32.9

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   27.8  30.0  26.9
             

Operating profit

   7.8  3.1  6.0

Interest and other income, net

   0.3  0.3  0.5
             

Earnings before income taxes

   8.1  3.4  6.5

Provision for income taxes

   3.0  1.2  2.3
             

Net income

   5.1  2.2  4.2
             

Fiscal (2008) Year Ended January 31,2010 Results Compared With Fiscal 2009 Compared

Net Income

Net income for fiscal 2010 was $24.2 million, or $0.79 per diluted share, compared with Fiscal (2007) Year Ended February 2, 2008net income of $9.1 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, for fiscal 2009. Our effective income tax rate for fiscal 2010 was 37.7% compared to 34.8% for fiscal 2009.

Net Sales

Net sales increased to $408.7were $478.8 million for fiscal 2008 from $381.42010 compared to $407.6 million for fiscal 2007,2009, an increase of $27.3$71.2 million or 7.1%17.5%. The increase reflected a comparable store sales increase of 11.9% for fiscal 2010 as well as the net addition of 23 stores (27 new stores offset by four store closures) in fiscal 2010.

Geographically, our best performing region for comparable store sales was the South, increasing 12%. Our stores west of Texas, which accounted for 50% of our comparable store sales, increased by 9%, our stores in the Northeast and Midwest increased by 8% combined and the remaining increase in comparable store sales is due to increases in our ecommerce sales. The increase in comparable stores sales was primarily driven by an increase in comparable store transactions, partially offset by a decline in dollars per transaction. Comparable store sales increases in men’s apparel, accessories, footwear, boy’s apparel and junior’s apparel were partially offset by comparable store sales decreases in hardgoods. For information as to how we define comparable stores, see “General” above.

Gross Profit

Gross profit was $170.4 million for fiscal 2010 compared to $134.7 million for fiscal 2009, an increase of $35.7 million, or 26.5%. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased 250 basis points for fiscal 2010 to 35.6% from 33.1% for fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily due to product margin improvement of 140 basis points and a 140 basis points decrease in store occupancy costs, partially offset by a 40 basis points increase due to distribution costs primarily associated with the exit costs and other charges of $2.4 million related to the relocation of our distribution center.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $133.0 million for fiscal 2010 compared to $122.0 million for fiscal 2009, an increase of $11.0 million, or 9.0%. SG&A expenses as a percent of sales decreased by 6.5%220 basis points for fiscal 2010 to 27.8% compared to 30.0% for fiscal 2009. The primary contributors to this decrease were 110 basis points due to store operating expense efficiencies gained by growing expenses at a slower rate than sales growth, the effect of the change in accounting estimate for the depreciable lives of our leasehold improvements of 90 basis points (as further explained in Note 2 in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), 60 basis points due to impairment charges of $2.5 million on 21 stores in fiscal 2009 and a 30 basis points impact of a litigation settlement charge of $1.3 million incurred fiscal 2009, partially offset by a 70 basis points impact of a litigation settlement charge of $2.1 million incurred in fiscal 2010.

Exit or Disposal Activities

On March 2, 2010, we acquired a 168,450 square foot building in Corona, California for $11.8 million and we have relocated our distribution facility from Everett, Washington to this facility. We believe that we will be more effective distributing our products through a distribution center located in Corona, California due to the majority of our vendors being located in Southern California. Cumulatively, during fiscal 2010, we have recorded $0.9 million of employee benefit costs (severance and performance bonuses), $0.6 million of lease termination costs, $0.3 million of loss on disposal of long-lived assets and $0.8 million of other costs to exit the

facility, partially offset by the $0.2 million benefit related to deferred rent liability. These amounts are included in cost of goods sold in our consolidated statements of operations. We do not expect to incur material additional costs related to the relocation.

Fiscal 2009 Results Compared With Fiscal 2008

Net Income

Net income in fiscal 2009 was $9.1 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, compared with $17.2 million, or $0.58 per diluted share, in fiscal 2008, a decrease of 46.9%. The decrease in net income was driven by the deleveraging effect of increased selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) on a decrease in net sales, partially offset by an improvement in gross profit as a percent of sales. Our effective income tax rate in fiscal 2009 was 34.8% compared to 35.6% in fiscal 2008.

Net Sales

Net sales in fiscal 2009 decreased 0.3% to $407.6 million. The decrease reflected a comparable store sales decline of 10.0% in the 52 week52-week period ended January 31,30, 2010, mostly offset by the net addition of 34 new stores in fiscal 2009 compared toand a full year of sales from the 52 week period ended February 2,58 stores opened in fiscal 2008.

Geographically our stores west of Texas, which account for 58%54% of our comparable store sales, declined by 11%. This decrease12.4%, while our comparable store sales in the Northeast, Midwest and South decreased 9.0% combined. The decline in comparable store sales was primarily due to lower netdriven by a decrease in comparable store transactions and all merchandise categories experienced comparable store sales of men's and women's apparel, snow and skate hardgoods and accessories, partially offset by an increase in net sales ofdeclines except footwear. For information as to how we define comparable stores, see "General"“General” above.

        The increase in total net sales was due to an increase in net sales from non-comparable stores of approximately $52.2 million partially offset by a decline in comparable store sales of approximately $24.9 million. The increase in non-comparable store net sales was primarily due to the opening of 58 new stores in fiscal 2008.

Gross Profit

Gross profit forwas $134.7 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $134.5 million in fiscal 2008, was $134.5 million compared with $137.0 million for fiscal 2007, a decreasean increase of $2.5$0.2 million or 1.8%0.2%. As a percentagepercent of net sales, gross profit decreased 3 fullincreased 0.2 percentage points in fiscal 2009 to 33.1% from 32.9% in fiscal 2008 from 35.9% in fiscal 2007.2008. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net salesincrease was driven primarily by store occupancy costs growing at a faster rate than sales (worth 1.4 percentage points), and lower product margins of 1.6 percentage points primarily due to apparelproduct margin improvement of 140 basis points and 20 basis points from supply chain efficiencies, largely offset by a store occupancy increase of 140 basis points. Store occupancy is largely a fixed cost for which is about 50% of our sales.we have a minimal ability to lower. Store occupancy costs increased as a percent to sales primarily due to a 10.0% same store sales decline.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative, or "SGSG&A" expenses was $122.0 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $109.9 million in fiscal 2008, were $109.9 million compared with $98.0 million in fiscal 2007, an increase of $11.9$12.1 million or 12.1%11.0%. This increase was primarily the result of costs associated with operating new stores as well as increases in infrastructure and administrative staff to support our growth partially offset by a decrease in stock-based and incentive compensation expenses. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expensesas a percent of sales increased


Table of Contents


1.2 percentage by 310 basis points in fiscal 2009 to 30.0% compared to 26.9% in fiscal 2008 from 25.7% in fiscal 2007.2008. The primary contributors to this increase in SG&Awere a 180 basis points increase for expenses asassociated with the opening of 36 new stores, 40 basis points related to impairment charges on 21 stores, and legal settlement costs contributing 30 basis points. New stores generally open with lower revenues than stores that have been open greater than one year, but a percentagemajority of net sales was primarily attributable to additional new store depreciation and store wages and benefits relative to the growth in net sales and increased shipping cost tooperating costs are not meaningfully lower than stores somewhat offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation and incentive compensation expenses.

Operating Profit

greater than one year old. As a result, of the above factors, operating profit decreased to $24.6 million for fiscal 2008, compared with $38.9 million in fiscal 2007 a decrease of $14.3 million or 36.8%. As a percentage of net sales, operating profit was 6.0% in fiscal 2008 compared with 10.2% in fiscal 2007.

Provision for Income Taxes

        Provision for income taxes was $9.5 million for fiscal 2008 compared with $15.3 million for fiscal 2007. The effective tax rate was 35.6% for fiscal 2008 and 37.7% for fiscal 2007. The lower effective tax rate was primarily duethese stores contribute to higher interest income from tax exempt municipal bonds.

Net Income

        Net income decreased to $17.2 million, in fiscal 2008 from $25.3 million in fiscal 2007 a decrease of $8.1 million, or 32.1%. As a percentage of net sales, net income was 4.2% in fiscal 2008 compared with 6.6% in fiscal 2007.

Fiscal (2007) Year Ended February 2, 2008 Compared with Fiscal (2006) Year Ended February 3, 2007

Net Sales

        Net sales increased to $381.4 million for fiscal 2007 from $298.2 million for fiscal 2006, an increase of $83.2 million, or 27.9%.

        Comparable store net sales increased by 9.2% in the 52 week period ended February 2, 2008 compared to the 52 week period ended February 3, 2007. This increase in comparable store sales was primarily due to higher net sales of men's and women's apparel, and skate hardgoods. For information as to how we define comparable stores, see "General" above.

        The increase in total net sales was due to an increase in comparable store net sales of approximately $23.6 million and an increase in net sales from non-comparable stores of approximately $59.6 million. The increase in non-comparable store net sales was primarily due to the opening of 50 new stores in fiscal 2007.

Gross Profit

        Gross profit for fiscal 2007 was $137.0 million compared with $108.2 million for fiscal 2006, an increase of $28.8 million, or 26.6%. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 35.9% in fiscal 2007 from 36.3% in fiscal 2006. The decrease in gross profitSG&A as a percentage of net sales was due primarilypercent to higher shrinkage, store occupancy costs, and distribution costs partially offset by higher product margins due to improved product management.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative, or "SG&A," expenses in fiscal 2007 were $98.0 million compared with $75.8 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $22.2 million, or 29.4%. This increase was primarily the result of costs associated with operating new stores as well as increases in infrastructure and administrative staff to support our growth. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses increased to 25.7% in fiscal 2007 from 25.4% in fiscal 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of


Table of Contents


net sales was primarily attributable to the increased stock based compensation of $2.5 million and increased depreciation expense of $3.9 million, partially offset by lower growth in store wages and benefits relative to the growth in net sales and lower incentive compensation expense.

Operating Profit

        As a result of the above factors, operating profit increased to $38.9 million for fiscal 2007, compared with $32.4 million in fiscal 2006 an increase of $6.5 million or 20.0%. As a percentage of net sales, operating profit was 10.2% in fiscal 2007 compared with 10.9% in fiscal 2006.

Provision for Income Taxes

        Provision for income taxes was $15.3 million for fiscal 2007 compared with $12.8 million for fiscal 2006. The effective tax rate was 37.7% for fiscal 2007 and 37.9% for fiscal 2006. The lower effective tax rate was due to higher interest income from tax exempt municipal bonds.

Net Income

        Net income increased to $25.3 million, in fiscal 2007 from $20.9 million in fiscal 2006 an increase of $4.4 million, or 21.4%. As a percentage of net sales, net income was 6.6% in fiscal 2007 compared with 7.0% in fiscal 2006.sales.

Seasonality and Quarterly Results

As is the case with many retailers of apparel and related merchandise, our business is subject to seasonal influences. As a result, we have historically experienced, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal and quarterly fluctuations in our net sales and operating results. Our net sales and operating results are typically lower in the first and second quarters of our fiscal year, while the back-to-school and winter holiday periods in our third and back-to-school periodsfourth fiscal quarters historically have accounted for the largest percentage of our annual net sales. Quarterly

results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing of store openings and the relative proportion of our new stores to mature stores, fashion trends and changes in consumer preferences, calendar shifts of holiday or seasonal periods, changes in merchandise mix, timing of promotional events, general economic conditions, competition and weather conditions.


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated.last two recent fiscal years. The unaudited quarterly information has been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein and includes all adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the information shown. This information should be read in conjunction with theour audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.thereto. The operating results for any fiscal quarter are not indicative of the operating results for a full fiscal year or for any future period and there can be no assurance that any trend reflected in such results will continue in the future.

 
 Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2008 Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2009 
 
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 
 
 (in thousands, except per share data)
 

Net sales

 $68,791 $81,974 $104,045 $126,606 $78,702 $92,258 $112,245 $125,464 

Gross profit (1)

 $21,721 $28,191 $38,508 $48,567 $24,560 $30,103 $39,263 $40,609 

Operating profit

 $2,183 $4,702 $12,722 $19,338 $1,626 $3,912 $10,384 $8,686 

Net income

 $1,617 $3,118 $8,149 $12,442 $1,362 $2,727 $6,818 $6,297 

Basic net income per share

 $0.06 $0.11 $0.28 $0.43 $0.05 $0.09 $0.23 $0.22 

Dilute net income per share

 $0.06 $0.11 $0.28 $0.42 $0.05 $0.09 $0.23 $0.21 

Number of stores open end of period

  254  266  283  285  306  324  340  343 

Comparable store sales increase (decrease)

  11.3% 11.6% 13.2% 4.0% (0.8%) (1.7%) (5.8%) (13.4%)

(1)
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the reclassification of shipping costs in Significant Accounting Policies for "Cost of Goods Sold" reclassification of shipping costs.

 Comparable store sales percentage changes are calculated by comparing comparable store sales for the applicable fiscal quarter to comparable store sales for the same fiscal quarter in the prior fiscal year. Comparable store sales are based on net sales and stores are considered comparable beginning on the first anniversary of the first day of operations. See "General" above for more information about how we compute comparable store sales.

   Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2011 
   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 
   (in thousands, except stores and per share data) 

Net sales

  $89,096   $97,702   $135,859   $156,192  

Gross profit

  $25,752   $30,716   $53,048   $60,881  

Operating profit (loss)

  $(3,254 $(2,368 $18,975   $24,014  

Net income (loss)

  $(1,900 $(1,214 $12,312   $15,005  

Basic earnings (loss) per share

  $(0.06 $(0.04 $0.41   $0.50  

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

  $(0.06 $(0.04 $0.40   $0.49  

Number of stores open at the end of the period

   381    393    400    400  

Comparable store sales increase

   9.1  9.3  14.4  13.0

   Fiscal Year Ended January 30, 2010 
   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 
   (in thousands, except stores and per share data) 

Net sales

  $76,808   $85,170   $113,192   $132,433  

Gross profit

  $21,900   $24,644   $40,099   $48,095  

Operating profit (loss)

  $(3,438 $(5,226 $8,357   $13,042  

Net income (loss)

  $(1,658 $(3,085 $5,073   $8,801  

Basic earnings (loss) per share

  $(0.06 $(0.10 $0.17   $0.30  

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

  $(0.06 $(0.10 $0.17   $0.29  

Number of stores open at the end of the period

   358    369    378    377  

Comparable store sales decrease

   (15.3%)   (18.8%)   (8.0%)   (1.7%) 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary uses of cash are for operational expenditures, capital investments, inventory purchases, store remodeling, store fixtures and ongoing infrastructure improvements such as technology enhancements and distribution capabilities. Historically, our main sources of liquidity have been cash flows from operations.

The significant components of our working capital are inventory and liquid assets such as cash, cash equivalents, current marketable securities and receivables, reduced by short-term debt, accounts payable and accrued expenses. Our working capital position benefits from the fact that we generally collect cash from sales to customers the same day or within several days of the related sale, while we typically have longer payment terms with our vendors.

        As ofAt January 31, 2009,29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, we held twoone $1.0 million Auction Rate Securitiespar value auction rate security valued at $1.8$0.9 million, net of approximately $0.2a $0.1 million temporary impairment charge. One of these $1.0 million securities failed to sell at its scheduled auction in March 2008. In May 2008, the remainingThe $1.0 million security failed to sell at its

scheduled auction. Theauction in March 2009 and March 2010. In March 2010, the interest ratesrate for these securitiesthe security reset to a prescribed "failure" tax-free rate of 6.55% and 3.20%, respectively.0.68% from 1.16%. We previously held another $1.0 million auction rate security that was redeemed at par in May 2009. We currently do not intend to hold these securitiesthe security beyond theirthe next auction date and will try to sell these securitiesthis security when theirthe auction dates comedate comes up in March 2009 and May 2009.2011. However, the uncertainties in the credit markets this fiscal year


Table of Contents


have prevented us and other investors from liquidating holdings of auction rate securities in recent auctions for these securities because the amount of securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. If the March 2009 and May 2009 auctions fail,2011 auction fails, we plan to hold these securitiesthe security until the next auction date and the securitiessecurity coupon rate will reset to a prescribed "failure"“failure” rate. Unsuccessful auctionsAn unsuccessful auction could result in our holding securitiesthe security beyond theirthe next scheduled auction reset dates if a secondary market does not develop;date; therefore, limiting the short-term liquidity of these investments. Thesethe investment. The security has been classified as available-for-sale marketable securities have been reclassified from "current" to "long term" assetsand included in long-term investments on ourthe consolidated balance sheetsheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010.

At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities were $128.8 million and $108.1 million. Working capital, the excess of current assets over current liabilities, was $155.4 million at the end of fiscal 2010, up 16% from $133.9 million at the end of fiscal 2009. The increase in cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities and working capital in fiscal 2010 were due primarily to the increased cash flow from operations driven primarily by an increase in net income, partially offset by the costs of opening 27 stores in fiscal 2010 and the purchase of our distribution center in Corona, California.

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years (in thousands):

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
  January 31,
2009
 

Total cash provided by (used in)

    

Operating activities

  $48,692   $45,116   $38,337  

Investing activities

   (44,011  (78,065  (11,943

Financing activities

   5,108    1,460    (5,282
             

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  $9,789   $(31,489 $21,112  
             

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $3.6 million from $45.1 million in fiscal 2009 to $48.7 million in fiscal 2010. Our operating cash flows result primarily from cash received from our customers, offset by cash payments we make for inventory, employee compensation, store occupancy expenses and other operational expenditures. Cash received from our customers generally corresponds to our net sales. Because our customers primarily use credit cards or cash to buy from us, our receivables from customers settle quickly. Changes to our operating cash flows have historically been driven primarily by changes in operating income and changes to the components of working capital, as well as changes to non-cash items such as deferred taxes, depreciation, amortization and accretion and excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $6.8 million from $38.3 million in fiscal 2008 to $45.1 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily due to changes in working capital, partially offset by a decrease in net income in fiscal 2009 compared to 2008.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $44.0 million in fiscal 2010 primarily related to capital expenditures of $29.4 million for new store openings, existing store renovations and the purchase of our new distribution center in Corona, California and by net purchases of marketable securities of $14.7 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $78.1 million in fiscal 2009 primarily related to capital expenditures for new

store openings and existing store renovations of $16.6 million and by net purchases of marketable securities of $61.5 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $11.9 million in fiscal 2008 primarily related to capital expenditures for new store openings and existing store renovations of $28.3 million partially offset by net sales of marketable securities of $16.4 million.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2010 was $5.1 million related to proceeds from stock option exercise and the associated tax benefits. Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2009 was $1.5 million related to proceeds from stock option exercise and the associated tax benefits. Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2008 was $5.3 million primarily related to short-term use of bank funds partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercise and associated tax benefits.

Sources of Liquidity

Our most significant sources of liquidity continue to be funds generated by operating activities, available cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities. We expect these sources of liquidity and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our foreseeable cash requirements for operations and planned capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. Beyond this time frame, if cash flows from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility are not sufficient to meet our capital requirements, then we will be required to obtain additional equity or debt financing in the future. However, there can be no assurance that equity or debt financing will be available to us when we need it or, if available, that the terms will be satisfactory to us and not dilutive to our then-current shareholders.

We renewed and amended our secured credit agreement with Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A., on June 10, 2009, and the prior facility agreement was terminated. The credit agreement provides us with a secured revolving credit facility until September 1, 2011 of up to $25.0 million. The secured revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of a standby letter of credit in an amount not to exceed $5.0 million outstanding at any time and with a term not to exceed 365 days. The commercial line of credit provides for the issuance of a commercial letter of credit in an amount not to exceed $10.0 million and with terms not to exceed 120 days. The amount of borrowings available at any time under our secured revolving credit facility is reduced by the amount of standby and commercial letters of credit outstanding at that time. There were no outstanding borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility at January 31, 2009.29, 2011 or January 30, 2010. We had open commercial letters of credit outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility of $0.5 million and $0.6 million at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. The secured revolving credit facility bears interest at the Daily One Month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions and covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things, (1) incur additional debt, (2) undergo a change in ownership and (3) enter into certain transactions. The credit agreement also contains financial covenants that require us to meet certain specified financial tests and ratios, including, a maximum net loss not to exceed $10.0 million after taxes on a trailing four-quarter basis provided, that, there shall be added to net income all charges for impairment of goodwill and store assets not to exceed $5.0 million in aggregate, and a minimum quick ratio of 1.25. The quick ratio is defined as our cash and near cash equivalents plus certain defined receivables divided by the outstanding borrowings. All of our personal property, including, among other things, our inventory, equipment and fixtures, has been pledged to secure our obligations under the credit agreement. We must also provide financial information and statements to our lender. We were in compliance with all such covenants at January 29, 2011.

Capital Expenditures

Our capital requirements include construction and fixture costs related to the opening of new stores and for remodeling expenditures for existing stores. Future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the pace of new store openings, the availability of suitable locations for new stores and the nature of arrangements negotiated with landlords. In that regard, our net investment to open a new store has varied significantly in the past due to a number of factors, including the geographic location and size of the new store, and is likely to vary significantly in the future.

During fiscal 2010, we spent $29.4 million on capital expenditures, related to investment in 27 new stores and 3 remodeled stores at a cost of $10.0 million, the acquisition and build-out costs of our new distribution center in Corona, California of $12.9 million, the acquisition costs of $3.2 million for land in Lynnwood, Washington, which we plan to use as the location of our new home office and $3.3 million in information technology projects and other improvements.

During fiscal 2009, we spent $16.6 million on capital expenditures, related to investment in 36 new stores and 7 remodeled stores at a cost of $14.8 million and $1.8 million in information technology projects and other improvements.

During fiscal 2008, we spent $28.3 million on capital expenditures, related to investment in 58 new stores and 8 remodeled stores at a cost of $27.1 million and $1.2 million in information technology projects and other improvements.

In upcoming fiscal 2011, we expect to spend approximately $23.0$32 million to $24.0$34 million on capital expenditures, a majority of which will relate to leasehold improvements and fixtures for the 3744 new stores we plan to open in fiscal 2009,2011 and a smaller amount will relate to equipment, systems and improvements forconstruction of our distribution center and support infrastructure. However, therenew home office building in Lynnwood, Washington. There can be no assurance that the number of stores that we actually open in fiscal 20092011 will not be different from the number of stores we plan to open, or that actual fiscal 20092011 capital expenditures will not differ from this expected amount.

        We expect cash flows from operations and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our foreseeable cash requirements for operations and planned capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. Beyond this time frame, if cash flows from operations, and borrowings under our revolving credit facility are not sufficient to meet our capital requirements, then we will be required to obtain additional equity or debt financing in the future. There can be no assurance that equity or debt financing will be available to us when we need it or, if available, that the terms will be satisfactory to us and not dilutive to our then-current shareholders.

        Net cash provided by operating activities increased by 4.0 million from $38.3 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $34.3 million in fiscal 2007. The increase was primarily due to the change in the effect of the tax benefit from stock option exercises from 2007 to 2008, partially offset by a decrease in net income. Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2007 was $34.3 million compared to $34.2 million for fiscal 2006. The change was primarily due to an increase in net income, offset by an increase in inventory needed to support 50 new stores and a decrease in trade accounts payable due to the timing of inventory receipts and associated payment in the fourth quarter. In addition, fiscal 2006 cash flow provided by operating activities benefited due to parts of Washington being declared a federal disaster area due to severe weather in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. In accordance with the Presidential Disaster Area tax relief, we deferred our federal income tax payment of $2.5 million from January 2007 to February 2007. This positively impacted fiscal 2006's cash flow provided by operations and negatively impacted fiscal 2007's cash flow provided by operations.

        Net cash used in investing activities was $11.9 million in fiscal 2008 primarily related to capital expenditures for new store openings and existing store renovations of $28.3 million partially offset by net sales of marketable securities of $16.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $51.2 million in fiscal 2007 primarily related to capital expenditures for new store openings and existing store renovations of $30.7 million and net purchases of marketable securities of $20.5 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $44.4 million in fiscal 2006, primarily related to capital expenditures for new store openings and existing store renovations of $22.2, the acquisition of the Fast Forward stores for $16.5 million and net purchases of marketable securities of $5.7 million.


Table of Contents

        Net cash used by financing activities in fiscal 2008 was $5.3 million primarily related to short term use of bank funds partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercise and associated tax benefits. Net cash provided by financing activities in the fiscal 2007 was $20.7 million, primarily related to proceeds from stock option exercise and associated tax benefits. Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2006 was $13.6 million, primarily related to proceeds from stock option exercise and the associated tax benefit and short term use of bank funds.

        We have a credit agreement with Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A. The credit agreement provides us with a secured revolving credit facility until August 30, 2009 of up to $25.0 million. The secured revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of standby commercial letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $5.0 million outstanding at any time and with a term not to exceed 365 days, although the amount of borrowings available at any time under our secured revolving credit facility is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit outstanding at that time. There were no outstanding borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility at January 31, 2009 or February 2, 2008. The Company had open letters of credit outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility of $0.3 million at January 31, 2009 and approximately $0.5 million at February 2, 2008. The secured revolving credit facility bears interest at floating rates based on the lower of the prime rate (3.25% at January 31, 2009) minus 0.50% or the LIBOR rate (2.00% at January 31, 2009), plus 1% for advances over $500,000 for a minimum of 30 days and a maximum of 180 days. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions and covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things, (1) incur additional debt, (2) undergo a change in ownership and (3) enter into certain transactions. The credit agreement also contains financial covenants that require us to meet certain specified financial tests and ratios, including, a minimum net income after taxes of $1.00 for any trailing twelve month period, a maximum total liabilities divided by tangible net worth of 1.15 and a minimum quick asset ratio of 1.0. Our two most restrictive covenants are our quick asset ratio that essentially precludes us from borrowing to the extent we were to have no cash, marketable securities or accounts receivable and our net income covenant that requires us make at least $1.00 in net income after taxes for any trailing twelve month period. All of our personal property, including, among other things, our inventory, equipment and fixtures, has been pledged to secure our obligations under the credit agreement. We must also provide financial information and statements to our lender. We were in compliance with all such covenants at January 31, 2009.

        It is our intention to enter into a new credit agreement with a financially sound banking institution prior to the expiration of the existing agreement Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

There waswere no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in our contractual obligations during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009. Our operating lease obligations are not recognized as liabilities in the financial statements.29, 2011. The following table summarizes the total amount of future payments due under certain of our contractual obligations and the amount of those payments due in future periods as ofat January 31, 200929, 2011 (in thousands):

Contractual Obligations
 Total Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than
5 Years
 

Operating Lease Obligations

 $326,488 $38,020 $79,394 $74,342 $134,732 

Purchase Obligations

  40,922  40,922       

Letters of Credit

  338  338       
            

 $367,748 $79,280 $79,394 $74,342 $134,732 
            

 

   Total   Fiscal
2011
   Fiscal 2012 and
Fiscal 2013
   Fiscal 2014 and
Fiscal 2015
   Thereafter 

Operating Lease Obligations

  $347,801    $46,721    $93,763    $87,304    $120,013  

Purchase Obligations

   76,474     76,474     —       —       —    
                         

Total

  $424,275    $123,195    $93,763    $87,304    $120,013  
                         

We occupy our retail stores and combined home office and distributionecommerce fulfillment center under operating leases generally with terms of five to ten years. SomeAt January 29, 2011, we were committed to property owners for operating lease obligations for $347.8 million. A majority of our leases haveprovide for ongoing co-tenancy requirements or early cancellation clauses


Table of Contents


which that would further lower rental rates, or permit lease terminations, or both, in the leaseevent that co-tenants cease to be terminated by usoperate for specific periods or if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods. Some leases contain renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years under substantiallyMost of the same terms and conditions as the original leases. In addition to future minimum lease payments, substantially all of our store leases provide for additional rental payments (or "percentage rent") if sales at the respective stores exceed specified levels, as well as therequire payment of common area maintenance chargesa specified minimum rent and real estate taxes.a contingent rent based on a percentage of the store’s net sales in excess of a specified threshold. Amounts in the above table do not include percentage rent, common area maintenance charges or real estate taxes. Most of our lease agreements have defined escalating rent provisions, which we have straight-lined over the term of the lease, including any lease renewals deemed to be probable. For certain locations, we receive cash tenant allowancestaxes unless these costs are fixed and we have reported these amounts as a deferred liability that is amortized to rent expense over the term of the lease, including any lease renewals deemed to be probable. Rent expense, including common area maintenance and other occupancy costs, was $31.9 million, $43.5 million and $52.9 million for fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. determinable.

At January 31, 2009,29, 2011, we had outstanding purchase orders to acquire merchandise from vendors for approximately $40.0 million.$76.5 million, including $0.5 million of letters of credit outstanding. We have an option to cancel these commitments with no notice prior to shipment. At January 31, 2009,shipment, except for private label purchase orders in which we had approximately $0.3 million of letters of credit outstanding.are obligated to repay certain contractual amounts upon cancellation.

Off-Balance Sheet Obligations

        Our only off-balance sheet contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of January 31, 2009 related to operating lease obligations and letters of credit. We have excluded these items from our balance sheet in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles "GAAP." We presently dodid not have any non-cancelable purchase commitments. Atoff-balance sheet arrangements at January 31, 2009 we had outstanding purchase orders to acquire merchandise from vendors for approximately $40.0 million. These purchases are expected to be financed by cash flows from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We have an option to cancel these commitments with no notice prior to shipment. At January 31, 2009 we had approximately $0.3 million of letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit facility.29, 2011.

Impact of Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our net sales or operating results for the past three fiscal years. There can be no assurance that our business will not be affected by inflation in the future.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See discussion in Item 7A—"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        In preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information disclosed by us, including information about contingencies, risk, and financial condition. We believe, given current facts and circumstances that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, adhere to GAAP, and are consistently applied. Inherent in the nature of an estimate or assumption is the fact that actual results may differ from estimates and estimates may vary as new facts and circumstances arise. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, we make routine estimates and judgments in determining the net realizable value of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets, prepaid assets, goodwill and certain liabilities. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of our significant accounting policies. We believe our most critical accounting estimates and assumptions are in the following areas:


Table of Contents

        Revenue recognition and sales returns reserve.    We recognize revenue upon purchase by customers at our retail store locations or upon shipment for orders placed through our website as both title and risk of loss have transferred. Revenue is not recorded on purchase of gift cards. A current liability is recorded upon purchase, and revenue is recognized when the gift card is redeemed for merchandise.

        Revenue is recorded net of estimated and actual sales returns and deductions for coupon redemptions and other promotions. The Company records the sale of gift cards as a current liability and recognizes revenue when a customer redeems a gift card. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered ("gift card breakage"). Gift card breakage is recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data. We offer a return policy of 30 days and the estimated sales return reserve is based on projected merchandise returns determined through the use of historical average return percentages. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our sales return reserve. However, if the actual rate of sales returns increases significantly, our operating results could be adversely affected.

        Valuation of merchandise inventories.    We carry our merchandise inventories at the lower of cost or market. Merchandise inventories may include items that have been written down to our best estimate of their net realizable value. Our decisions to write-down our merchandise inventories are based on our current rate of sale, the age of the inventory and other factors. Actual final sales prices to our customers may be higher or lower than our estimated sales prices and could result in a fluctuation in gross margin. These write-downs may have a material adverse impact on earnings, depending on the extent and amount of inventory affected.

        We estimate an inventory shrinkage reserve for anticipated losses for the period. Shrinkage refers to a reduction in inventory due to shoplifting, employee theft and paperwork errors. The estimate for the shrinkage reserve is calculated based on historical percentages and can be affected by changes in merchandise mix and changes in actual shrinkage trends. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our inventory shrinkage reserve. However, if actual physical inventory losses differ significantly from our estimate, our operating results could be adversely affected.

        Impairment of Leasehold Improvements and Equipment.    We review leasehold improvements and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by comparing projected individual store discounted cash flow to the asset carrying values. Declines in projected store cash flow could result in the impairment of assets. In fiscal 2008 we took a charge for leasehold improvement impairment of $812,000 based on projected performance of five stores. If our sales and margins decline in fiscal 2009 and beyond additional impairment charges could occur. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculated leasehold improvements and equipment impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions, our operating results could be adversely affected.

        Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments.    We will record an investment impairment charge at the point we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other-than-temporary. In determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, we review information about the underlying investment that is publicly available such as analyst reports, applicable industry data and other pertinent information, and assess our ability to hold the security for the foreseeable future. The investment would be written down to its current market value at the time


Table of Contents


the impairment is deemed to have occurred. Future adverse changes in market conditions, continued poor operating results of underlying investments or other factors could result in further losses that may not be reflected in an investment's current carrying value, possibly requiring an additional impairment charge in the future. Any other-than-temporary impairment charge could materially affect our results of operations.

        Lease Accounting.    The Company occupies its retail stores and combined home office and distribution center under operating leases generally with terms of five to ten years. Some of these leases have early cancellation clauses, which permit the lease to be terminated if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods. Some leases contain renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years under substantially the same terms and conditions as the original leases. Most of the store leases require payment of a specified minimum rent, plus a contingent rent based on a percentage of the store's net sales in excess of a specified threshold. Most of the lease agreements have defined escalating rent provisions, which are straight-lined over the term of the related lease, including any lease renewals deemed to be probable. The Company straight-lines and recognizes its rent expense over the term of the lease, plus the construction period prior to occupancy of the retail location, using a mid-month convention. For certain locations, the Company receives cash tenant allowances and has reported these amounts as a deferred liability which is amortized to rent expense over the term of the lease.

        Income Taxes.    As part of the process of preparing the financial statements, income taxes are estimated for each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We calculate income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes ("SFAS No. 109"), which requires the use of the asset and liability method and involves estimating actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the balance sheet. The likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income is assessed, recognizing that future taxable income may give rise to new deferred tax assets. To the extent that future recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance would be established. To the extent that a valuation allowance is established or increased, an expense will be included within the tax provision in the income statement.

        Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. Based on our history of operating earnings, no valuation allowance has been recorded as of January 31, 2009. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates, or these estimates are adjusted in future periods, a valuation allowance may need to be established, which could impact our financial position and results of operations.

        The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing in the financial statements tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, including a decision whether to file or not to file in a particular jurisdiction. Under FIN 48, a tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is "more likely than not" that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. Provisions for income taxes are based on numerous factors that are subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service and the tax authorities in the various jurisdictions in which we do business.

        Stock-based compensation.    Effective January 29, 2006, we adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123(R)"), under provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin N0. 107 ("SAB 107") using the modified prospective method of transition. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the estimated fair value of share-based awards granted under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.


Table of Contents

        To determine the fair value of our share-based issuances, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires management to apply judgment and make assumptions to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees will retain their vested stock options before exercising them (the "expected term"), the estimated volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term and an estimate of the number of options that will ultimately be forfeited.

        We calculate a weighted-average expected term using the "simplified method" under the provisions of SAB 107. The "simplified method" calculates the expected term as the average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the options. We use a historical volatility as we believe that this is representative of future stock price trends. Estimated forfeitures are calculated based on historical experience. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the estimate of the fair value of our share-based payments and the related amount recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

        We recorded $4.4 million of total stock-based compensation expense for the year ended January 31, 2009 of which $0.5 was attributable to the Board of Directors as required by the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). The stock-based compensation expense is calculated on an accelerated method for stock options and a straight-line basis for restricted stock over the vesting periods of the related equity grant. This charge had no impact on our reported cash flows.

        At January 31, 2009 there was $8.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards of which $0.2 was attributable to the Board of Directors. This cost is expected to be recognized on a weighted-average basis over a period of approximately three to eight years.

        We account for unvested stock-based employee compensation arrangements granted prior to our initial public offering on the intrinsic value method as allowed by SFAS 123(R).

        Goodwill.    We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change to suggest that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We test goodwill for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of net assets to the fair value of the related operations. If the fair value is determined to be less than carrying value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of impairment. We estimate fair value using discounted cash flows of reporting units. Forecasts of future cash flow are based on our best estimate of future net sales and operating expenses. In this process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated and compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value represents the amount of goodwill impairment. Changes in these forecasts could significantly change the amount of impairment recorded, if any.

        The financial and credit market volatility directly impacts our fair value measurement through our weighted average cost of capital that we use to determine our discount rate and through our stock price that we use to determine our market capitalization. During times of volatility, significant judgment must be applied to determine whether credit or stock price changes are a short-term swing or a longer-term trend.

Recently IssuedRecent Accounting Pronouncements

        In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FSP No. SFAS 157-2, which delays the effective dateSee Item 15 of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," for nonfinancial assetsPart IV, “Exhibits and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other than those meeting the definition of a financial asset or financial liability as defined in paragraph 6 of SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." This FASB Staff Position defers the effective date of Statement 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within


Table of Contents


those fiscal years for items within the scope of FSP No. SFAS 157-2. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FSP No. SFAS 157-2 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No, 141(R)"), which replaces SFAS No. 141,"Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141"). SFAS No. 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting but SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects. Acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; non-controlling interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date; in-process research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141(R) would also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements." SFAS No. 160 amendsStatements—Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and requires (i) classification of non-controlling interests, commonly referred to as minority interests, within stockholders' equity, (ii) net income to include the net income attributable to the non-controlling interest and (iii) enhanced disclosure of activity related to non-controlling interests. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 142-3,Determination of the Useful Lives of Intangible Assets ("FSP 142-3"), which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R) and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP No. 142-3 to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally AcceptedPolicies—Recent Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." This statement will not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. SFAS 157-3 ("FSP 157-3"), "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active." FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of


Table of Contents


SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP157-3 is effective immediately, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The Company has adopted FSP 157-3 effective with the financial statements ended November 1, 2008. The adoption of FSP 157-3 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31. 2009.Pronouncements.”

Risk Factors, Issues and Uncertainties

Please refer to the information set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” above for a discussion of risk factors, issues and uncertainties that our business faces.

Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Item 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are susceptible to market value fluctuations with regard to our short-term investments. However, due to the relatively short maturity period of those investments and our intention and ability to hold those investments until maturity, the risk of material market value fluctuations is not expected to be significant.

During different times of the year, due to the seasonality of our business, we may borrow under our revolving credit facility. To the extent we borrow under our revolving credit facility, which bears interestsinterest at floating rates based either on the primeDaily One Month LIBOR rate or LIBOR,plus 1.00%, we are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. At January 31, 200929, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility. At January 29, 2011, we had $0.5 million of open commercial letters of credit outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility. We are not a party to any derivative financial instruments. Fluctuations in interest rates did not have a material effect on the results of operations in fiscal 2008.2010.

Interest Rate Risk

Our earnings are affected by changes in market interest rates as a result of our short-term and long-term investments, which are primarily invested in tax-exemptstate and local municipal securities, U.S. treasuries, municipal bonds, taxable agency bonds,Treasury securities, U.S. Agency securities and auction rate securities,variable-rate demand notes, which have long-term contractual maturitiesnominal maturity dates but feature variable interest rates that reset at short-term intervals. We also invest in long-term agency bonds. If our current portfolio average yield rate decreasesdecreased by 10% in fiscal 2009,2010, our net income before taxes will decreasewould have decreased by approximately $0.2$0.1 million. Our current expectation is that our investment yields will be lowerremain low in 20092011 due to historically low interest rates. These amounts areThis amount is determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical yield rates on our cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investment balances. These analyses doThis analysis does not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall investments that could happen in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our investments structure.

Item 8.CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Item 8.    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Information with respect to this item is set forth in "Index“Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements," under "Part“Part IV, Item 15"15” of this report.

Item 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

 None.


Table of Contents


Item 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"(“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"(“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)). Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of January 31, 200929, 2011 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) during the quarter ended January 31, 200929, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The effectiveness of Zumiez Inc. internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 200929, 2011 has been audited by Moss Adams LLP, the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.

        Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is included in this Form 10-K under Part III,IV, Item 15, "Exhibits“Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statements."

Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Item 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
PART III

 None.


PART III

Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Item 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding our directors and nominees for directorship is presented under the headings "Election“Election of Directors," in our definitive proxy statement for use in connection with our 20092011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Proxy Statement"“Proxy Statement”) that will be filed within 120 days after our fiscal year ended January 31, 200929, 2011 and is incorporated herein by this reference thereto. Information concerning our executive officers is set forth under the heading "Executive Officers"“Executive Officers” in our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto. Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our code of conduct and ethics and certain information related to the Company'sCompany’s Audit Committee and Governance Committee is set forth under the heading "Corporate Governance"“Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information regarding the compensation of our directors and executive officers and certain information related to the Company'sCompany’s Compensation Committee is set forth under the headings "Executive“Executive Compensation," "Director” “Director Compensation," "Compensation” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Compensation” “Report of the Compensation Committee Report"of the Board of Directors” and "Compensation“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation"Participation” in our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by this reference thereto.

Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Item 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth under the headings "Security“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management"Management” and "Equity“Equity Compensation Plan Information"Information” in our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by this reference thereto.


Table of Contents


Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Item 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is presented under the heading "Corporate Governance"“Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by this reference thereto.

Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Item 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information concerning principal accounting fees and services is presented under the heading "Fees“Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2008Years 2010 and 2007"2009” in our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by this reference thereto.


PART IV

Item 15.EXHIBITS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 15.    EXHIBITS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Zumiez Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

This process includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company'sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

The Company'sCompany’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009. Management's29, 2011. Management’s assessment was based on criteria described in theInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"(“COSO”). Based on that assessment, the Company'sCompany’s management concluded that the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2009.29, 2011.

The effectiveness of Zumiez Inc. internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 200929, 2011 has been audited by Moss Adams LLP, the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ZUMIEZ INC.

 ZUMIEZ INC.



/s/ RICHARDS/ RICHARD M. BROOKS, Jr.
BROOKS


Signature


3/23/09

Date

 By:3/15/11

Signature

 Date

By:   Richard M. Brooks Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

 



/s/ TREVORTREVOR S. LANG
LANG


Signature


3/23/09

Date

 By:3/15/11

Signature

 Date

By:   Trevor S. Lang, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ THOMASS/ THOMAS D. CAMPION
CAMPION

3/15/11/S/ WILLIAM M. BARNUM, JR.3/15/11

Signature

Date

Signature

Date

Thomas D. Campion, Chairman

 3/23/09

Date

/s/ DAVID DEMATTEI

Signature
David DeMattei, Director

 

3/23/09

Date

/s/ GERALD F. RYLES

Signature
Gerald F. Ryles, Director

 

3/23/09

Date

/s/ WILLIAM M. BARNUM, JR.

Signature

William M. Barnum, Jr., Director


 

3/23/09

Date

/s/ JIM WEBER

Signature
Jim Weber, Director


3/23/09

Date

/s/ MATTHEWS/ MATTHEW L. HYDE
HYDE

3/15/11/S/ JAMES M. WEBER3/15/11

Signature

Date

Signature

Date

Matthew L. Hyde, Director

James M. Weber, Director

/S/ GERALD F. RYLES
 

3/15/11
/S/ SARAH G. MCCOY3/23/09

15/11

Signature

Date

Signature

Date

Gerald F. Ryles, Director

Sarah G. McCoy, Director


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To theThe Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Zumiez Inc.

We have audited Zumiez Inc.'s’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009,29, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("the COSO criteria").Commission. The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control.control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also includesincluded performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Zumiez Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009, in all material respects,29, 2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO criteria.Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Zumiez Inc. as of January 31, 200929, 2011 and February 2, 2008,January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the periodsthree fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 200729, 2011, and our report dated March 20, 200915, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 20, 200915, 2011


Table of Contents


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended February 3, 2007, February 2, 2008, and January 31, 2009


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To theThe Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Zumiez Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Zumiez Inc. (the “Company”) as of January 31, 200929, 2011 and February 2, 2008January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the periodsthree fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007.29, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Zumiez Inc. as of January 31, 200929, 2011 and February 2, 2008January 30, 2010 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the periodsthree fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 200729, 2011, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        As discussed in Notes 2 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, on February 3, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements."

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Zumiez Inc.'s’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009,29, 2011 based on criteria established inInternal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 20, 200915, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion.opinion thereon.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 20, 200915, 2011


ZUMIEZ INC.

Table of Contents


ZUMIEZ INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)

 
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Assets

       

Current assets

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $11,945 $33,057 

Marketable securities

  64,587  45,525 

Receivables

  4,775  4,555 

Inventory

  48,721  51,974 

Prepaid expenses and other

  4,440  5,614 

Deferred tax assets

  1,089  2,588 
      
 

Total current assets

  135,557  143,313 

Leasehold improvements and equipment, net

  
65,937
  
73,932
 

Goodwill and other intangibles

  13,154  13,236 

Marketable securities—long term

    1,767 

Deferred tax assets

  1,447  1,101 
      
 

Total long-term assets

  80,538  90,036 
 

Total assets

 
$

216,095
 
$

233,349
 
      

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

       

Current liabilities

       

Trade accounts payable

 $19,672 $15,909 

Book overdraft

  7,384   

Accrued payroll and payroll taxes

  5,097  4,739 

Income taxes payable

  47  238 

Current portion of deferred rent and tenant allowances

  2,136  2,735 

Other accrued liabilities

  9,060  7,600 
      
 

Total current liabilities

  43,396  31,221 

Long-term deferred rent and tenant allowances, less current portion

  
18,097
  
24,177
 
      
 

Total liabilities

  61,493  55,398 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

       

Shareholders' equity

       

Preferred stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding

     

Common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 29,002,852 shares issued and outstanding at February 2, 2008, 29,533,067 shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2009

  69,297  75,789 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  464  117 

Retained earnings

  84,841  102,045 
      
 

Total shareholders' equity

  154,602  177,951 
 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 
$

216,095
 
$

233,349
 
      

See acccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


Table of Contents


ZUMIEZ INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
thousands)

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Net sales

 $298,177 $381,416 $408,669 

Cost of goods sold

  189,959  244,429  274,134 
        

Gross profit

  108,218  136,987  134,535 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  
75,774
  
98,042
  
109,927
 
        

Operating profit

  32,444  38,945  24,608 

Interest income, net

  
1,178
  
1,722
  
2,059
 

Other income (expense)

  (16) 3  36 
        

Earnings before income taxes

  33,606  40,670  26,703 

Provision for income taxes

  
12,750
  
15,344
  
9,499
 
        

Net income

 $20,856 $25,326 $17,204 
        

Basic net income per share

 $0.76 $0.89 $0.59 
        

Diluted net income per share

 $0.73 $0.86 $0.58 
        

Weighted average shares used in computation of earnings per share:

          
 

Basic

  
27,542,891
  
28,608,818
  
29,126,889
 
 

Diluted

  
28,703,037
  
29,322,337
  
29,694,112
 

   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
 

Assets

   

Current assets

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $11,357   $1,568  

Marketable securities

   117,444    106,483  

Receivables

   6,129    5,600  

Inventories

   56,303    50,916  

Prepaid expenses and other

   7,210    6,102  

Deferred tax assets

   2,418    3,045  
         

Total current assets

   200,861    173,714  

Fixed assets, net

   78,248    66,008  

Goodwill and other intangibles

   13,154    13,186  

Long-term deferred tax assets

   5,703    5,537  

Long-term investments

   2,766    872  

Long-term other assets

   899    948  
         

Total long-term assets

   100,770    86,551  
         

Total assets

  $301,631   $260,265  
         

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

   

Current liabilities

   

Trade accounts payable

  $16,371   $16,817  

Accrued payroll and payroll taxes

   7,580    6,593  

Income taxes payable

   4,108    4,006  

Deferred rent and tenant allowances

   3,719    3,248  

Other liabilities

   13,683    9,123  
         

Total current liabilities

   45,461    39,787  

Long-term deferred rent and tenant allowances

   27,629    26,375  

Long-term other liabilities

   1,806    1,427  
         

Total long-term liabilities

   29,435    27,802  
         

Total liabilities

   74,896    67,589  
         

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

   

Shareholders’ equity

   

Preferred stock, no par value, 20,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding

   —      —    

Common stock, no par value, 50,000 shares authorized; 30,835 shares issued and outstanding at January 29, 2011 and 30,251 shares issued and outstanding at January 30, 2010

   91,373    81,399  

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

   (17  101  

Retained earnings

   135,379    111,176  
         

Total shareholders’ equity

   226,735    192,676  
         

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $301,631   $260,265  
         

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


ZUMIEZ INC.

Table of Contents


ZUMIEZ INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
OPERATIONS

(In thousands)
thousands, except per share amounts)

 
 Common Stock  
 Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
  
  
 
 
 Employee
Stock
Options
 Retained
Earnings
  
 
 
 Shares Amount Total 

Balance at January 28, 2006

  27,259 $34,770 $260 $(5)$38,659 $73,684 
              

Exercise of common stock options, including tax benefit of $6,822

  622  8,228        8,228 

Stock based compensation

    2,313  (260)     2,053 

Unrealized (losses), net

        (9)   (9)

Net income

          20,856  20,856 
              

Balance at February 3, 2007

  27,881  45,311    (14) 59,515  104,812 
              

Exercise of common stock options, including tax benefit of $16,527

  1,122  19,417        19,417 

Stock based compensation

    4,569        4,569 

Unrealized gains, net

        478    478 

Net income

          25,326  25,326 
              

Balance at February 2, 2008

  29,003  69,297    464  84,841  154,602 
              

Exercise of common stock options, including tax benefit of $1,173

  530  2,102        2,102 

Stock based compensation

    4,390        4,390 

Unrealized (losses), net of tax of $213

        (347)   (347)

Net income

          17,204  17,204 
              

Balance at January 31, 2009

  29,533 $75,789 $ $117 $102,045 $177,951 
              

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
   January 31,
2009
 

Net sales

  $478,849   $407,603    $408,669  

Cost of goods sold

   308,452    272,865     274,134  
              

Gross profit

   170,397    134,738     134,535  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   133,030    122,003     109,927  
              

Operating profit

   37,367    12,735     24,608  

Interest income, net

   1,496    1,176     2,059  

Other (expense) income, net

   (8  96     36  
              

Earnings before income taxes

   38,855    14,007     26,703  

Provision for income taxes

   14,652    4,876     9,499  
              

Net income

  $24,203   $9,131    $17,204  
              

Basic earnings per share

  $0.81   $0.31    $0.59  
              

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.79   $0.30    $0.58  
              

Weighted average shares used in computation of earnings per share:

     

Basic

   29,971    29,499     29,127  

Diluted

   30,794    30,133     29,694  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


Table of ContentsZUMIEZ INC.


ZUMIEZ INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net income

 $20,856 $25,326 $17,204 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

          

Depreciation and amortization

  10,499  14,762  19,470 

Deferred tax expense

  (1,306) (1,826) (1,221)

Stock-based compensation expense

  2,053  4,569  4,390 

Loss on disposal of assets

  132  119  271 

Impairment of long-lived asets

      812 

Loss (Gain) from sales of marketable securities, net

  17  (2) (36)

Excess tax benefit from stock options

  (6,822) (16,527) (1,173)
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

          
  

Receivables

  (1,309) 448  220 
  

Inventory

  (198) (6,564) (3,253)
  

Prepaid expenses and other

  (2,713) (847) (1,174)
  

Trade accounts payable

  (3,371) (4,492) (3,763)
  

Accrued payroll and payroll taxes

  330  313  (358)
  

Income taxes payable

  10,112  9,976  1,364 
  

Other accrued liabilities

  1,506  2,244  (1,460)
  

Deferred rent and tenant allowances

  4,409  6,787  7,044 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  34,195  34,286  38,337 
        

Cash flows from investing activities:

          

Additions to leasehold improvements and equipment

  (22,160) (30,722) (28,349)

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

  (16,542)    

Purchases of marketable securities

  (157,433) (143,957) (82,607)

Sales and maturities of marketable securities

  151,785  123,459  99,013 
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (44,350) (51,220) (11,943)
        

Cash flows from financing activities:

          

Change in book overdraft

  6,083  1,301  (7,384)

Payments on revolving credit facility

  (732)    

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  1,406  2,890  929 

Excess tax benefit from stock options

  6,822  16,527  1,173 
        

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  13,579  20,718  (5,282)
        

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  3,424  3,784  21,112 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  4,737  8,161  11,945 
        

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 $8,161 $11,945 $33,057 
        

Supplemental disclosure on cash flow information:

          
 

Cash paid during the period for interest

 $ $4 $11 
 

Cash paid during the period for income taxes

  4,027  7,324  9,422 
 

Non-cash operating activity—dispositon of gift card breakage liability

    303   
 

Non-cash investing activity—acquisition costs in other accrued liabilities

    250   

   Common Stock   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
  Retained     
   Shares   Amount   Income (Loss)  Earnings   Total 

Balance at February 2, 2008

   29,003    $69,297    $464   $84,841    $154,602  
                        

Net income

   —       —       —      17,204     17,204  

Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax of $213

   —       —       (347  —       (347
            

Comprehensive income

          16,857  
            

Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation, including tax benefit of $1,173

   530     2,102     —      —       2,102  

Stock-based compensation expense

   —       4,390     —      —       4,390  
                        

Balance at January 31, 2009

   29,533     75,789     117    102,045     177,951  
                        

Net income

   —       —       —      9,131     9,131  

Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax of $7

   —       —       (16  —       (16
            

Comprehensive income

          9,115  
            

Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation, including tax benefit of $707

   718     1,461     —      —       1,461  

Stock-based compensation expense

   —       4,149     —      —       4,149  
                        

Balance at January 30, 2010

   30,251     81,399     101    111,176     192,676  
                        

Net income

   —       —       —      24,203     24,203  

Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax of $76

   —       —       (118  —       (118
            

Comprehensive income

          24,085  
            

Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation, including tax benefit of $3,248

   584     5,108     —      —       5,108  

Stock-based compensation expense

   —       4,866     —      —       4,866  
                        

Balance at January 29, 2011

   30,835     91,373     (17  135,379     226,735  
                        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


ZUMIEZ INC.

Table of ContentsCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29,
2011
  January 30,
2010
  January 31,
2009
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

  $24,203   $9,131   $17,204  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

   17,923    22,092    19,470  

Deferred taxes

   537    (4,886  (1,221

Stock-based compensation expense

   4,866    4,149    4,390  

Loss on disposal of assets

   283    141    271  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   (3,248  (707  (1,173

Impairment of long-lived assets

   105    2,538    812  

Other

   70    (36  (36

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Receivables

   (92  (319  220  

Inventories

   (5,387  1,058    (3,253

Prepaid expenses and other

   (1,137  (656  (1,174

Trade accounts payable

   (446  908    (3,763

Accrued payroll and payroll taxes

   987    1,854    (358

Income taxes payable

   3,350    4,475    1,364  

Deferred rent and tenant allowances

   1,838    3,917    6,814  

Other liabilities

   4,840    1,457    (1,230
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   48,692    45,116    38,337  
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Additions to fixed assets

   (29,361  (16,548  (28,349

Purchases of marketable securities and other investments

   (179,611  (128,963  (82,607

Sales and maturities of marketable securities and other investments

   164,961    67,446    99,013  
             

Net cash used in investing activities

   (44,011  (78,065  (11,943
             

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Change in book overdraft

   —      —      (7,384

Proceeds from exercise of stock-based compensation

   1,860    753    929  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   3,248    707    1,173  
             

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   5,108    1,460    (5,282
             

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   9,789    (31,489  21,112  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

   1,568    33,057    11,945  
             

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  $11,357   $1,568   $33,057  
             

Supplemental disclosure on cash flow information:

    

Cash paid during the period for interest

  $54   $10   $10  

Cash paid during the period for income taxes

   10,789    5,288    9,422  

Non-cash investing activity—refundable use tax in fixed assets

   359    (1,506  —    

Non-cash investing activity—asset retirement obligations in fixed assets

   129    1,095    —    

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.    Nature and Ownership of Business and Basis of Presentation

Nature of BusinessBusiness—Zumiez Inc. (the "Company"“Company,” “we,” “us,” “its” and “our”) is a leading specialty retailer of action sports related apparel, footwear, equipment and accessories operating under the Zumiez brand name. As ofAt January 31, 2009 the Company29, 2011, we operated 343400 stores primarily located in shopping malls, giving the Companyus a presence in 3137 states. The Company'sOur stores cater to young men and women between the ages of 12 and 24 who seek popular brands representing a lifestyle centered on activities that include skateboarding, surfing, snowboarding, bicycle motocross (or "BMX"“BMX”) and motocross. The Company supportsWe support the action sports lifestyle and promotes itspromote our brand through a multi-faceted marketing approach that is designed to integrate itsour brand image with its customers'our customers’ activities and interests. In addition, the Company operateswe operate a website whichthat sells merchandise online and provides content and a community for itsour target customers. The Company based in Everett, WA, was formed in August 1978, its home office and ecommerce fulfillment center are located in Everett, Washington and its distribution center is located in Corona, California. The Company operates within one reportable segment. We account for our business operation as one reportable segment based on the similar nature of products sold, production, merchandising and distribution processes involved, target customers and economic characteristics.

Fiscal Year—The Company usesYear—We use a fiscal calendar widely used by the retail industry that resultresults in a fiscal year consisting of a 52- or 53- week53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. Each fiscal year consists of four 13-week quarters, with an extra week added to the fourth quarter every five or six years. Fiscal 2007 and fiscal2010 was the 52-week period ending January 29, 2011. Fiscal 2009 was the 52-week period ended January 30, 2010. Fiscal 2008 werewas the 52-week periodsperiod ended February 2, 2008 and January 31, 2009 respectively. Fiscal 2006 was a 53-week period ended February 3, 2007.2009.

        Stock Split—On March 15, 2006 the Company's Board of Directors approved a two for one stock split of the Company's common stock that was effected by a share dividend and became effective April 19, 2006. All reference to shares in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes, including but not limited to the number of shares and per share amounts, unless otherwise noted, have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis. Previously awarded stock options in the Company's common stock have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

Basis of PresentationPresentation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"(“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Zumiez Inc. and its subsidiary, Zumiez Nevada, LLC.wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

        Revision toReclassification of Previously Issued Financial Statements of Cash FlowsPriorCertain prior period amounts have been reclassified to fiscal 2007conform to the Company classified tenant allowances received from landlords ascurrent period presentation. These reclassifications do not have a reduction of leasehold improvements and equipment in the cash flows from investing activities section ofmaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements. We have reclassified $21.4 million on the consolidated statements ofbalance sheet at January 30, 2010 from cash flows. The appropriate classification isequivalents to include tenant allowances in deferred rent,short-term marketable securities related to variable-rate demand notes and municipal bonds, which is included inhave an embedded put option that allows the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. While these reclassified securities are considered highly liquid, we believe they are more appropriately classified as short-term marketable securities. This reclassification increased net cash provided by operating activities. For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 we corrected the classification of tenant allowances in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The effect of this adjustment was to increase cash used in investing activities and to increase net cash flow provided by operating activities by $4.3$21.4 million for fiscal 2006. There was no impact on the net increase in cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company has determined these adjustments were not material and has properly classified tenant allowances in the statementstatements of cash flows for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007.January 30, 2010. We have also reclassified $0.9 million on the consolidated balance sheets at January 30, 2010 related to long-term assets from receivables and prepaid expenses and other to long-term other assets. There was no impact on the consolidated statements of cash flows from this reclassification.

2.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of EstimatesEstimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates can also affect supplemental information disclosed by the Company,us, including information about contingencies, risk and financial condition. In preparing the financial statements, the Company makes routine estimates and judgments in determining the net realizable value of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets, and accrued liabilities. Some of the more significant estimates include the allowance for sales returns, the reserve for inventory valuation estimates, medical and dental insurance reserve and the expected useful lives of fixed assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.these estimates and assumptions.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—We disclose the estimated fair value of certain assets and liabilities as financial instruments. Financial instruments are generally defined as cash, evidence of ownership interest in an

entity or a contractual obligation that both conveys to one entity a right to receive cash or other financial instruments from another entity and imposes on the other entity the obligation to deliver cash or other financial instruments to the first entity. Our financial instruments, other than those presented in “Note 10. Fair Value Measurements,” include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and other liabilities. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and other liabilities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Cash and Cash EquivalentsWe consider all highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Concentration of Risk—The Company maintains itsRisk—We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in accounts with major financial institutions, in the United States of America, in the form of demand deposits, certificates of deposits and money market accounts.accounts and state and local municipal securities. Deposits in this bankthese financial institutions may exceed the amountsamount of federal deposit insurance provided on such deposits. The Company hasWe have not experienced any losses on itsour deposits of cash and cash equivalents. The Company's accounts receivable are substantially comprised of credit card purchases from customers and are typically settled within two to three days.

        Restricted CashMarketable Securities—At January 31, 2009 the Company had no restricted cash. At February 2, 2008 the Company had $250,000 of restricted cash held in escrow related to the fiscal 2006 acquisition of twenty stores from Fast Forward.

        Marketable Securities—At29, 2011 and January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008,30, 2010, marketable securities, classified as available for sale,available-for-sale, were $47.3$118.3 million and $64.6$107.4 million, respectively, and consisted primarily of state and local municipal securities, U.S. treasury reservesTreasury securities, U.S. Agency securities and U.S. agency debt instrumentsvariable-rate demand notes with original maturities over 90 days. Variable-rate demand notes are considered highly liquid. Although the variable-rate demand notes have long-term nominal maturity dates, the interest rates generally reset weekly. Despite the long-term nature of the underlying securities of the variable-rate demand notes, we have the ability to quickly liquidate these securities, which have an embedded put option that allows the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest.

Generally accepted accounting principles require recording an investment impairment charge at the point we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other-than-temporary. In determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, we review information about the underlying investment that is publicly available such as analyst reports, applicable industry data and other pertinent information and assess our intent to hold the security and whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell any investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The investment would be written down to its current market value at the time the impairment is deemed to have occurred. Future adverse changes in market conditions, continued poor operating results of underlying investments or other factors could result in further losses that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, possibly requiring an additional impairment charge in the future.

Inventories—Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The cost of merchandise inventories are based upon an average cost methodology. Merchandise inventories may include items that have been written down to our best estimate of their net realizable value. Our decisions to write-down our merchandise inventories are based on their current rate of sale, the age of the inventory, the profitability of the inventory and other factors. Actual final sales prices to customers may be higher or lower than our estimated sales prices and could result in a fluctuation in gross profit. Historically, any additional write-downs have not been significant. We have reserved for inventory at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 in the amounts of $3.2 million and $2.8 million. The inventory reserve includes inventory whose estimated market value is below cost and an estimate for inventory shrinkage. We estimate an inventory shrinkage reserve for anticipated losses for the period. Shrinkage refers to a reduction in inventory due to shoplifting, employee theft and other matters. The inventory related to these reserves is not marked up in subsequent periods.

Fixed Assets—Fixed assets primarily consist of land, buildings, leasehold improvements, fixtures, computer equipment, software and store equipment. Fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation utilizing the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. The useful lives of our major classes of fixed assets are as follows:

Leasehold improvements

Lesser of 10 years or the term of the lease

Fixtures

3 to 7 years

Computer equipment, software, store equipment & other

3 to 5 years

Buildings and improvements

15 to 39 years

The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of is removed from the accounts and the related gain or loss is reported in the consolidated statements of operations.

In accordance with our fixed asset policy, we review the estimated useful lives of our fixed assets on an ongoing basis. This review indicated that the actual lives of leasehold improvements were longer than the estimated useful lives used for depreciation purposes in our consolidated financial statements. As a result, effective January 31, 2010, we changed our estimate of the useful lives of our leasehold improvements to the lesser of 10 years or the term of the lease to better reflect the estimated periods during which these assets will remain in service. The useful lives of leasehold improvements were previously estimated to be the lesser of 7 years or the term of the lease. For the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, the effect of this change in estimate was to reduce depreciation expense by $4.2 million, increase net income by $2.7 million and increase basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.09.

Asset Retirement Obligations An asset retirement obligation (ARO) represents a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset that is incurred upon the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of that long-lived asset. Our AROs are primarily associated with leasehold improvements that, at the end of a lease, we are contractually obligated to remove in order to comply with certain lease agreements. The ARO is recorded in other liabilities and long-term other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and will be subsequently adjusted for changes in fair value. The associated estimated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over its useful life.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets—We review the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment annually, or as indicators of impairment are present. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset or group of assets. Generally, fair value will be determined using accepted valuation techniques, such as the present value of expected future cash flows. During the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, two stores were determined to be impaired, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $0.1 million. During the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, 21 stores were determined to be impaired, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $2.5 million. These non-cash impairment charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—We evaluate the recoverability of goodwill annually based on a two-step impairment test. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. Additional impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis if we encounter events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that, more likely than not, the carrying amount of goodwill has been impaired.

Equity Method InvestmentsWe hold a 14.3% interest in a manufacturer of apparel and hard goods, which we acquired for $2.0 million on May 11, 2010. We have elected to apply fair value accounting for this investment, which would otherwise be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We have elected fair value accounting, as we believe the terms of the contract are more properly reflected through the fair value

method. The investment balance is reported in long-term investments on the consolidated balance sheets, with the corresponding changes in the fair value recorded in other income (expense), net on the consolidated statements of operations.

The investment agreement allows for a put option, where Zumiez has an option to sell its interest back to the investee for the greater of the initial purchase price of $2.0 million or the fair value of the investment. This put option is allowed any time following the fifth anniversary of the initial investment, but prior to the seventh anniversary of the initial investment. Additionally, the investment agreement allows for a call option, where the investee has an option to repurchase the interest from Zumiez for the fair value of the investment. This call option is allowed any time on or after the seventh anniversary of the initial investment. We have elected to apply fair value accounting for the put and call options. The put option has a nominal value and the call option has no fair value, given that the investment would be repurchased at its fair value if the call option were exercised.

Deferred Rent, Rent Expense and Tenant Allowances—We occupy our retail stores and combined home office and ecommerce fulfillment center under operating leases generally with terms of five to ten years. A majority of our leases provide for ongoing co-tenancy requirements or early cancellation clauses that would further lower rental rates, or permit lease terminations, or both, in the event that co-tenants cease to operate for specific periods or if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods. Most of the store leases require payment of a specified minimum rent and a contingent rent based on a percentage of the store’s net sales in excess of a specified threshold. Most of the lease agreements have defined escalating rent provisions, which are straight-lined over the term of the related lease, including any lease renewals deemed to be probable. We recognize rent expense over the term of the lease, plus the construction period prior to occupancy of the retail location. For certain locations, we receive tenant allowances and report these amounts as a liability, which is amortized to rent expense over the term of the lease.

Claims and ContingenciesWe are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits, insurance, regulatory and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. We accrue a liability if the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount is estimable. If the likelihood of an adverse outcome is only reasonably possible (as opposed to probable), or if an estimate is not determinable, we provide disclosure of a material claim or contingency in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition—Sales are recognized upon purchase at our retail store locations. For orders placed through our website, revenue is recognized upon estimated delivery to the customer. Taxes collected from our customers are recorded on a net basis. We record the sale of gift cards as a current liability and recognize revenue when a customer redeems a gift card. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered (“gift card breakage”). Gift card breakage is recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data. We report shipping revenues within net sales. Revenue is recorded net of estimated and actual sales returns and deductions for promotions. We accrue for estimated sales returns by customers based on historical sales return results. The allowance for sales returns at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 was $0.7 million and $0.3 million. The Company offers a return policy of 30 days.

We present our net sales by category as a percentage of net sales in the following table. “Accessories and Other” includes all other merchandise (e.g., hardgoods, accessories, footwear, etc.). The percentage of net sales for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 was as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010  January 31, 2009 

Men’s Apparel

   32.5  31.2  30.6

Junior’s Apparel

   10.1  11.2  14.2

Accessories and Other

   57.4  57.6  55.2
             

Total

   100.0  100.0  100.0
             

Cost of Goods Sold—Cost of goods sold consists of branded merchandise costs and our private label merchandise costs including design, sourcing, importing and inbound freight costs. Our cost of goods sold also includes shrinkage and buying, occupancy, distribution and warehousing costs. This may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their cost of goods sold. We receive cash consideration from vendors, which have been recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold if the inventory has sold, as a reduction of the carrying value of the inventory if the inventory is still on hand, or a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense if the amounts are reimbursements of specific, incremental and identifiable costs of selling the vendors’ products.

With respect to the freight component of our ecommerce sales, we arrange and pay the freight for our customers and bill them for this service, unless our customers have their product shipped to one of our stores or we have free shipping promotions to our customers, in which case we do not bill our customers. Such amounts billed are included in net sales and the related freight cost is charged to cost of goods sold. For fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, we incurred shipping costs related to ecommerce sales of $2.6 million, $1.2 million and $0.8 million.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense—Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of store personnel wages and benefits, administrative staff and infrastructure expenses, outbound freight, store supplies, depreciation on fixed assets at the home office and stores, facility expenses and training, advertising and marketing costs. Credit card fees, insurance, public company expenses, legal expenses and other miscellaneous operating costs are also included in selling, general and administrative expenses. This may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their selling, general and administrative expenses.

Advertising—We expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses are net of sponsorships and vendor reimbursements. Advertising expense was $1.3 million, $0.8 million and $0.8 million for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010, and January 31, 2009.

Stock-Based Compensation—We account for stock-based compensation by which the estimated fair value of stock-based awards granted is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized using an accelerated method for stock options and a straight-line basis for restricted stock. We estimate forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical experience and expected future activity.

The fair value of restricted stock awards is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock option grants are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method based on the following subjective assumptions:

Volatility—This is a measure of the amount by which a stock price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. We use actual daily historical changes in the market value of our stock since becoming a public company in May 2005. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense.

Risk-free interest rate—This is the U.S. Treasury rate as of the grant date having a term equal to the expected term of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.

Expected term—The expected term was calculated using the simplified method outlined by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment (SAB 107). Under this method, the expected term is equal to the sum of the weighted average vesting term plus the original contractual term divided by two. We have elected this method as we have concluded that we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time our equity shares have been publicly traded.

Dividend yield—We do not have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used for stock option grants issued during the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010  January 31, 2009 

Dividend yield

   0.0  0.0  0.0

Volatility rate

   67.5  66.8  55.4

Expected life (in years):

    

Expected lives—four years

   6.50    6.25    6.25  

Expected lives—five years

   6.50    6.50    6.50  

Expected lives—eight years

   —      —      7.25  

Risk-free interest rate

   2.4  1.7  2.8

Income Taxes—Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Valuation allowances may be established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We did not have a valuation allowance recorded at January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009.

We recognize tax benefits from an uncertain position only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions may be classified in the financial statements as either income taxes or interest and another expense classification. The Company has elected to classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. We did not have unrealized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions recorded at January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009.

Earnings per Share—Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock is applicable only in periods of net income. Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalent outstanding during the period. Common share equivalents included in the computation represent shares issuable upon assumed exercise of outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan funds held to acquire stock and non-vested restricted stock. Potentially anti-dilutive securities not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share are options to purchase common stock where the option exercise price is greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the period reported.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements—In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. The guidance requires a revised approach to identifying a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and requires additional disclosures about an entity’s involvement in variable interest entities. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We adopted the new requirements in the three months ended May 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about fair value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. In addition, the guidance clarifies certain existing disclosure requirements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the additional Level 3 reconciliation disclosures, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted the new requirements in the three months ended May 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements in the three months ended May 1, 2010.

In July 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. For disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period, the guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. For disclosures required about activity that occurs during a reporting period, the guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We adopted the new requirements in the three months ended January 29, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

3.    Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

The following tables summarize the estimated fair market value of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and the gross unrealized holding gains and losses at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 (in thousands):

   January 29, 2011 
   Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
 

Cash and cash equivalents:

       

Cash

  $7,160    $—      $—     $7,160  

Money market funds

   928     —       —      928  

State and local government securities

   3,269     —       —      3,269  
                   

Total cash and cash equivalents

   11,357     —       —      11,357  
                   

Marketable securities:

       

Treasury and agency securities

   6,043     26     —      6,069  

State and local government securities

   103,110     125     (195  103,040  

Variable-rate demand notes

   9,205     —       —      9,205  
                   

Total marketable securities

  $118,358    $151    $(195 $118,314  
                   

Less: Long-term marketable securities (1)

        (870
          

Total current marketable securities

       $117,444  
          

   January 30, 2010 
   Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
 

Cash and cash equivalents:

       

Cash

  $1,081    $—      $—     $1,081  

Money market funds

   487     —       —      487  
                   

Total cash and cash equivalents

   1,568     —       —      1,568  
                   

Marketable securities:

       

Treasury and agency securities

   15,268     48     —      15,316  

State and local government securities

   70,538     255     (136  70,657  

Variable-rate demand notes

   21,382     —       —      21,382  
                   

Total marketable securities

  $107,188    $303    $(136 $107,355  
                   

Less: Long-term marketable securities (1)

        (872
          

Total current marketable securities

       $106,483  
          

(1)At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, we held one $1.0 million par value auction rate security valued at $0.9 million net of a $0.1 million temporary impairment charge, classified as available-for-sale marketable securities and included in long-term investments on the consolidated balance sheets.

All of our available-for-sale securities, excluding our auction rate security, have an effective maturity date of two years or less and may be liquidated, at our discretion, prior to maturity. For the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale marketable securities were not material. We use the specific identification method to determine any realized gains or losses from the sale of our marketable securities classified as available-for-sale.

The following tables summarize the gross unrealized holding losses and fair value for investments in an unrealized loss position at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position (in thousands):

   January 29, 2011 
   Less Than Twelve Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 
   Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
 

Marketable securities:

          

Treasury and agency securities

  $—      $—     $—      $—     $—      $—    

State and local government securities

   42,761     (62  1,907     (133  44,668     (195

Variable-rate demand notes

   —       —      —       —      —       —    
                            

Total marketable securities

  $42,761    $(62 $1,907    $(133 $44,668    $(195
                            
   January 30, 2010 
   Less Than Twelve Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 
   Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
 

Marketable securities:

          

Treasury and agency securities

  $—      $—     $—      $—     $—      $—    

State and local government securities

   8,389     (8  872     (128  9,261     (136

Variable-rate demand notes

   —       —      —       —      —       —    
                            

Total marketable securities

  $8,389    $(8 $872    $(128 $9,261    $(136
                            

We did not record a realized loss for other-than-temporary impairments during the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009. At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, we had $1.8$0.9 million invested, net of temporary impairment charge of $0.2$0.1 million, in an auction rate securities which aresecurity that is classified as long term available-for-sale marketable securities in long-term investments on ourthe consolidated balance sheet.

sheets. Auction rate securities are generally long-term debt instruments that provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals. This mechanism generally allows existing investors to rollover their holdings and to continue to own their respective securities or liquidate their holdings by selling their securities at par value. Prior to February 3, 2008, we invested in these securities for short periods of time as part of our cash management program. However, the uncertainties in the credit markets that began in early 2008 have prevented us and other investors from liquidating holdings of auction rate securities in recent auctions for these securities because the amount of securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. Should the auctionsauction continue to fail, we anticipatedo not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we havewill be required to sell the ability to hold these securities untilinvestment before the liquidity in the market improves. These investments areAdditionally, the investment is fully collateralized by the United States government and are insured against loss of principal and interest by a bond insurer whose credit rating is Baa1 by Moody's Investors Services.U. S. government. Although we are uncertain as to when the liquidity issues relating to these investmentsthis investment will improve, we consider these issues to be onlythe issue temporary. It is possible that further declinesAs a result of the temporary decline in fair value may occur, and those declines, if any, would be recognizedfor our auction rate security, we have recorded an unrealized loss of $0.1 million, which is included in ouraccumulated other comprehensive (loss) income on the consolidated balance sheet as "accumulated other comprehensive income." If we deem these losses to be other than temporary we will realize these loses in our statement of operations.sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact, if any, on the fair market value of the investments.investment. It is possible that further declines in fair value may occur, and those declines, if any, would be recognized in accordance with GAAP, and if it is later determined that the fair value of this security is other-than-temporarily impaired, we will record a loss in the consolidated statements of operations. Due to our belief that the market for this investment may take in excess of twelve months to fully recover, we have classified it as a noncurrent asset in long-term investments on the consolidated balance sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010.


Table of Contents4.    Receivables


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        ReceivablesAt January 31, 200929, 2011 and February 2, 2008,January 30, 2010, receivables include, tenant allowances receivable, credit cards receivable, interest receivable, employee receivables and other.on the consolidated balance sheets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Tenant allowances receivable

 $1,334 $901 

Credit cards receivable

  2,108  1,884 

Interest receivable

  557  418 

Employee receivables

  257  410 

Vendor credits

  324  483 

Other receivables

  175  459 
      

 $4,755 $4,555 
      

 The company does

   January 29, 2011   January 30, 2010 

Credit cards receivable

  $2,468    $2,161  

Interest receivable

   1,220     894  

Refundable use tax

   1,053     1,506  

Tenant allowances receivable

   704     575  

Other receivables

   684     464  
          
  $6,129    $5,600  
          

We do not extend credit to itsour customers except through independent third-party credit cards, which are generally collected in several business days. The refundable use tax amounts in the table of $1.1 million and $1.5 million at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 represents an overpayment of use tax on construction costs to build and remodel stores that is expected to be collected or credited from state jurisdictions.

        Merchandise Inventories5.    Fixed Assets—Merchandise inventories are valued at

At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, fixed assets on the lower of cost or market. The cost of merchandise inventories are based upon an average cost methodology. Merchandise inventories may include items that have been written down to the Company's best estimate of their net realizable value. The Company's decisions to write-down its merchandise inventories are based on its current rate of sale, the ageconsolidated balance sheets consist of the inventoryfollowing (in thousands):

   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010 

Leasehold improvements

  $93,011   $88,892  

Fixtures

   49,738    46,219  

Computer equipment, software, store equipment and other

   15,586    11,807  

Land, building and building improvements

   14,890    —    
         

Fixed assets, at cost

   173,225    146,918  

Less: accumulated depreciation

   (94,977  (80,910
         

Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation

  $78,248   $66,008  
         

In March 2010, we acquired a 168,450 square foot building in Corona, California for $11.8 million and other factors. Actual final sales pricesrelocated our distribution center from Everett, Washington to customers may be higherthis facility in the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. Refer to “Note 16. Exit or lower than the Company's estimated sales pricesDisposal Activities” for discussion of our exit activity related to this relocation.

Depreciation expense on fixed assets was $16.4 million, $20.3 million, and could result in a fluctuation in gross profit. Historically, any additional write-downs have not been significant to the Company. We have reserved$18.8 million for inventory as offiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 20092009.

6.    Goodwill and February 2, 2008 inOther Intangible Assets

We recorded $13.2 million of goodwill as the amounts of approximately $3.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The inventory reserve includes inventory whose estimated market value is below cost and an estimate for inventory shrinkage. The inventory related to these reserves is not marked up in subsequent periods.

        Leasehold Improvements and Equipment—Leasehold improvements and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation utilizing the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful lives. The useful lives of our major classes of assets are as follows:

Leasehold improvements

Lesser of 7 years or the term of the lease

Fixtures

3 to 7 years

Computer equipment, software, store equipment & other

3 - 5 years

        The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of is removed from the accounts and the related gain or loss is reported in the consolidated statement of operations.

        Valuation of Long-Lived Assets—The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Measurementexcess of the impairment loss is based onpurchase price of $15.5 million over the fair value of the asset or groupnet amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition of assets. Generally, fair valueAction Concepts Fast Forward, Ltd. in 2006. We will be determined using accepted valuation techniques, such as the present value of expected future cash flows.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, management performed a review of the carrying value of long-lived assets conductedcontinue to assess, in accordance with SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of long-Lived Assets." The review revealed that five stores were underperformingour goodwill policy as stated in fiscal 2008. Accordingly, a non-cash impairment charge of $812,000 was included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the 2008 fiscal year.

        Fair Value of Financial Instruments—Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instrument" ("SFAS No. 107"), requires management to disclose the estimated fair value of certain assets and liabilities as financial instruments. Financial instruments are generally defined by SFAS No. 107 as cash, evidence of ownership interest in an entity, or a contractual obligation that both conveys to one entity a right to receive cash or other financial instruments from another entity and imposes on the other entity the obligation to deliver cash or other financial instruments to the first entity. At January 31, 2009 and FebruaryNote 2, 2008 the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and other accrued liabilities approximated fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying value of marketable securities, excluding auction rate securities described below, approximate the fair value because these financial instruments have floating interest rates which reflect current market conditions.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements." defines fair value, establishes framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In October 2008, the FASB, issued FSP No. SFAS 157-3 ("FSP 157-3"), "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. "FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," in a market thatwhether goodwill is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. Contractual maturities of investments underlying our available-for-sale securities at January 31, 2009 included $1.8 million in auction rate securities, net of $0.2 million temporary impairment. Based on current market conditions, auctions related to these securities may be unsuccessful at the scheduled auctions in fiscal 2009. Unsuccessful auctions could result in our holding securities beyond their next scheduled auction reset dates if a secondary market does not develop; therefore, limiting the short-term liquidity of these investments.

        Deferred Rent, Rent Expense and Tenant Allowances—The Company occupies its retail stores and combined home office and distribution center under operating leases generally with terms of five to ten years. Some of these leases have early cancellation clauses, which permit the lease to be terminated if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods. Some leases contain renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years under substantially the same terms and conditions as the original leases. Most of the store leases require payment of a specified minimum rent, plus a contingent rent based on a percentage of the store's net sales in excess of a specified threshold. Most of the lease agreements have defined escalating rent provisions, which are straight-lined over the term of the related lease, including any lease renewals deemed to be probable. The Company straight-lines and recognizes its rent expense over the term of the lease, plus the construction period prior to occupancy of the retail location, using a mid-month convention. For certain locations, the Company receives cash tenant allowances and has reported these amounts as a deferred liability which is amortized to rent expense over the term of the lease. Also included in rent expense are payments of real estate taxes, insurance and certain common area and maintenance costs in addition to the future minimum operating lease payments. All other pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142"), the Company does not amortize goodwill derived from purchase business combinations. The Company evaluates the recoverability of goodwill annually based on a two-step impairment test. The first step compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. Additional impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis if the Company encounters events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that, more likely than not, the book value of goodwill has been impaired. There was no impairment of goodwill in the 2008, 2007 and 2006 fiscal years.

        Other Accrued Liabilities—At January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 other liabilities consisted of the following:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Accrued Payables

 $3,475 $2,564 

Gift cards payable

  3,033  3,061 

Accrued sales tax

  1,793  1,425 

Other current liabilities

  759  550 
      

 $9,060 $7,600 
      

        Income Taxes—The provision for income taxes includes both current and deferred tax expenses. Current tax expense is the amount associated with current operating results. The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances may be established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

        Comprehensive Income—Comprehensive income represents all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $17.3 million, $ 25.8 million and $20.8 million, respectively comprised of net income plus or (minus) net unrealized gains or (losses) on our available-for-sale securities.

        Revenue Recognition—Sales are recognized upon purchase at the Company's retail store locations or upon shipment for orders placed through the Company's website as both title and risk of loss have transferred. Taxes collected from the Company's customers are and have been recorded on a net basis. The Company records the sale of gift cards as a current liability and recognizes revenue when a customer redeems a gift card. The amount of the gift card liability is determined taking into account our estimate of the portion of gift cards that will not be redeemed or recovered ("gift card breakage"). Gift card breakage is recognized as revenue after 24 months, at which time the likelihood of redemption is considered remote based on our historical redemption data. The Company reports shipping revenues and costs within sales and cost of goods sold, respectively. The Company accrues for estimated sales returns by customers based on historical sales return results. The allowance for sales returns as of January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was approximately $282,000,


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


$279,000 and $275,000, respectively. The Company offers a return policy of 30 days. The Company has the right to assess gift card dormancy fees in certain states, but has historically not done so.

        The Company entered into an agreement with an independent third party that assumed the unredeemed liability for gift cards that had not yet reached the statutory term for unclaimed property. As a result of the agreement, certain third-party claims on unredeemed gift cards for the State of Delaware have been removed, thus allowing the company to recognize additional revenue of approximately $303,000 in fiscal 2007.

        The Company operates exclusively in the retail apparel industry in which the Company distributes, designs and produces clothing, accessories and related products catering to the teenage/young adult demographic through primarily mall-based retail stores. The Company has identified one operating segment as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS No. 131"). The company accounts for its business operation as one reportable segment based on the similar nature of products sold, production, merchandising and distribution processes involved, target customers, and economic characteristics.

        The Company presents its merchandise assortment as a percentage of net sales for the following categories: "Men's," which includes men's apparel; "Women's," which includes women's apparel; and "Accessories and Other," which includes all other merchandise (e.g., hardgoods, accessories, footwear, etc.). The percentage of net sales for each of the aforementioned categories for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008 was as follows:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Men's

  31.9% 32.4% 30.6%

Women's

  15.4% 15.4% 14.2%

Accessories and Other

  52.7% 52.2% 55.2%
        
 

Total

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
        

        Cost of Goods Sold—Cost of sales consists of branded merchandise costs, and our private label merchandise including design, sourcing, importing and inbound freight costs. Our cost of sales also includes markdowns, shrinkage, certain promotional costs and buying, occupancy and warehousing costs. This may not be comparable to the way in which the Company's competitors or other retailers compute their cost of goods sold. In fiscal 2006 the Company reported shipping costs on ecommerce sales in selling, general and administrative expense. During 2007 the Company reclassified these costs to costs of goods sold. For fiscal 2006 the company reclassified approximately $349,000 of these costs from selling, general and administrative expense to cost of goods sold to conform to fiscal 2007 presentation. The Company does receive insignificant amounts of cash consideration from vendors which have been reported as a reduction of expenses or inventory on hand as the amounts are reimbursements of specific, incremental and identifiable costs of selling the vendors' products.

        With respect to the freight component of our ecommerce sales, we arrange and pay the freight for our customers and bill them for this service. Such amounts billed are included in revenue and the related freight cost is charged to cost of goods sold. For fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the Company incurred shipping costs related to ecommerce sales of approximately $799,000, $534,000 and $349,000 respectively.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Selling, General and Administrative Expense—Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of store personnel wages and benefits, administrative staff and infrastructure expenses, store supplies, depreciation on leasehold improvements at the home office and stores, facility expenses, training, and advertising and marketing costs. Credit card fees, insurance and other miscellaneous operating costs are also included in selling, general and administrative expenses. This may not be comparable to the way in which the Company's competitors or other retailers compute their selling, general and administrative expenses.

        Advertising—The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses are net of sponsorships. Advertising expense was approximately $763,000, $748,000 and $651,000 in fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively.

        Stock Compensation—The Company maintains several stock incentive plans under which non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options and restricted stock have been granted to employees and non-employee directors. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123(R)"). Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the estimated fair value of share-based awards granted under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

        The fair value of stock option grants are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants issued during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007.

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Dividend yield

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Volatility rate

  35.0% 53.4% 55.4%

Average expected life (in year):

          

Expected lives—Eight years

  6.38  6.38  7.25 

Expected lives—Five years

  6.00  6.00  6.50 

Average risk-free interest rate

  4.77% 4.55% 2.77%

Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 200829, 2011, January 30, 2010 and February 3, 2007 (in thousands except weighted-average exercise price):

 
 Stock Options Grant Date
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at January 28, 2006

  2,812 $1.95 

Granted

  517 $27.91 

Exercised

  (611)$1.37 

Forfeited

  (43)$23.13 
      

Outstanding at February 3, 2007

  2,675 $6.76 

Granted

  515 $36.54 

Exercised

  (1,095)$2.05 

Forfeited

  (137)$17.55 
      

Outstanding at February 2, 2008

  1,958 $16.29 

Granted

  160 $14.25 

Exercised

  (211)$2.46 

Forfeited

  (114)$28.20 
      

Outstanding at January 31, 2009

  1,793 $17.13 
      

Exercisable at January 31, 2009

  712 $11.37 
      

        During the fiscal year ended January 31, 20092009.

In 2008, we acquired the Company granted 160,000 stock options with a Black-Scholes weighted average fair valueassets of $7.89 and a weighted average exercise price of $14.25.an Island Snow store from Kodama Incorporated located in Honolulu, Hawaii. In connection with these grants of stock options,the purchase, the Company recognized approximately $509,400 in stock-based compensation expense during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009.

        The following table summarizes the Company's restricted stock activity for the year ended January 31, 2009, and February 2, 2008 (in thousands except weighted-average exercise price):

 
 Restricted
Stock
 Grant Date
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 Intrinsic
Value (1)
 

Outstanding February 3, 2007

     $ 

Granted

  16 $37.19   
        

Outstanding at February 2, 2008

  16 $37.19  320,640 
        

Granted

  333 $14.52   

Vested

  (5)$37.54   

Forfeited

  (59)$14.05   
        

Outstanding at January 31, 2009

  285 $15.49 $2,034,053 
        

(1)
Intrinsic value for restricted stock awards is defined as the market value on the last business day of the fiscal year. The market value was $20.04 at February 2, 2008 and $7.15 at January 31, 2009.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company granted approximately 333,000 shares of restricted stock withentered into a weighted average fair market value on the date of grant of $14.52 per share. In connection with these grants, the Company recognized approximately $828,000 in stock-based compensation expense during the year ended January 31, 2009 of which approximately $155,000 was attributable to the Board of Directors.

        During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company issued 40,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock based upon predetermined earnings milestones. The performance-based milestones were not met, the restricted stock did not vest, and any compensation expense we had recognized to date was reversed.

        The Company recorded approximately $4.4 million, $4.6 million and $2.1 million of total stock-based compensation expense for the years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, of which approximately $0.5 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively, was attributable to the Board of Directors. The stock-based compensation expense is calculated on an accelerated method for stock options and a straight-line basis for restricted stock over the vesting periods of the related equity grant. This charge had no impact on the Company's reported cash flows. For the years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the Company recorded approximately $0.2 million each year, respectively, in stock based compensation expense pursuant to APB 25. At January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, there was approximately $8.6 million and $9.2 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and restricted stock grants of which approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million respectively, was attributable to the Board of Directors. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately three to eight years.

        Net Income per Share—Basic net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period. Common share equivalents included in the computation represent shares issuable upon assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and non-vested restricted stock. Potentially anti-dilutive securities not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share include options to purchase common stock where the option exercise price is greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock during the period reported. Total anti-dilutive common stock options not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share were approximately 814,000, 130,000 and 40,000 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively.

        Merchandise Risk—The Company's success is largely dependent upon its ability to gauge the fashion tastes of its customers and provide merchandise that satisfies customer demand. Any inability to provide appropriate merchandise in sufficient quantities in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.

    Recent accounting pronouncements

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141No. (R),") which replaces SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141"). SFAS No. 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of SFAS 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting but SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects. Acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; non-controlling interests will be valued at fair


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

value at the acquisition date; in-process research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinationsnoncompetition agreement for which the acquisition date is on or afterCompany paid $0.1 million and recorded an intangible asset. Under this agreement, Kodama Incorporated agreed not to compete with Zumiez for a period of two years. We amortized the beginningnon-compete agreement over the term of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxesagreement and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141(R) would also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements." SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and requires (i) classification of non-controlling interests, commonly referred to as minority interests, within stockholders' equity, (ii) net income to include the net income attributable to the non-controlling interest and (iii) enhanced disclosure of activity related to non-controlling interests. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

        In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FSP No. SFAS 157-2, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other than those meeting the definition of a financial asset or financial liability as defined in paragraph 6 of SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." This FASB Staff Position defers the effective date of Statement 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of FSP No. SFAS 157-2. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FSP No. SFAS 157-2 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 142-3,Determination of the Useful Lives of Intangible Assets ("FSP 142-3"), which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognizedJanuary 29, 2011, this intangible asset under FASB No. 142,has been fully amortized.

7.    Other LiabilitiesGoodwill

At January 29, 2011 and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R) andJanuary 30, 2010, other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP No. 142-3 to have a material effectliabilities on the consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS 162 is


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approvalbalance sheets consisted of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The adoption of this statement will not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In October 2008, the FASB, issued FSP No. SFAS 157-3 ("FSP 157-3"), "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active." FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP157-3 is effective immediately, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The Company has adopted FSP 157-3 effective with the financial statements ended November 1, 2008. The adoption of FSP 157-3 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

3. Cash and Cash Equivalentsfollowing (in thousands):

 The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

   January 29, 2011   January 30, 2010 

Accrued sales tax

  $3,906    $1,497  

Unredeemed gift cards

   3,260     2,930  

Accrued payables

   3,092     2,695  

Accrued legal

   2,211     1,512  

Other current liabilities

   1,214     489  
          
  $13,683    $9,123  
          

        The following table summarizes the fair market value of our cash and marketable securities, which are recorded as cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, our short-term investments and our long-term investments:

 
 January 31, 2009 
 
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Unrealized
Gains
 Unrealized
Losses
 

Cash and cash equivalents:

          
 

Cash

 $33,057 $ $ 
        

Total cash and cash equivalents

  33,057     
        

Investments with a maturity dates less than twelve months:

          
 

Treasury and agency securities

  8,389  38   
 

State and local government securities

  21,384  92   
        

Total maturities less than twelve months

  29,773  130   
        

Investments with a maturity date greater than twelve months:

          
 

State and local government securities (a)

  17,519  157  (170)
        

Total maturities greater than twelve months

  17,519  157  (170)
        

Total

 $80,349 $287 $(170)
        

Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. Cash and Cash Equivalents (Continued)


 
 Less Than 12 Months Greater Than or Equal to
12 Months
 
 
 Net Unrealized
Gains
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Net Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)
 Estimated
Fair Value
 

January 31, 2009

             
 

Treasury and agency securities

 $38 $8,389 $ $ 
 

State and local government securities (a)

  92  21,384  (13) 17,519 
          

Total

  130  29,773  (13) 17,519 
          

February 2, 2008

             
 

State and local government securities

  233  47,788  231  16,799 
          

Total

 $233 $47,788 $231 $16,799 
          
(a)
There is approximately $1.8 million of marketable securities, net of $0.2 million unrealized holding loss, that have been in a continuous loss position for longer than twelve months as of January 31, 2009.

4. Leasehold Improvements and Equipment

        Leasehold improvements and equipment consist of the following:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Leasehold improvements

 $68,669 $82,167 

Fixtures

  35,674  43,983 

Computer equipment, software, store equipment and other

  10,125  11,857 
      

Leasehold improvements and equipment, at cost

  114,468  138,007 

Less accumulated depreciation

  (48,531) (64,075)
      

Leasehold improvements and equipment, net

 $65,937 $73,932 
      

        Depreciation expense on leasehold improvements and equipment was $18.8 million, $14.6 million, and $10.4 million for fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. Fair Value Measurements

        Effective February 3, 2008 (the first day of our 2008 fiscal year), the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"), as clarified by FSP FAS No. 157-3 "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active," for financial assets and financial liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements as follows:

    Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

    Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable;

    Level 3—Inputs that are unobservable.

        In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active" ("FSP 157-3"). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 to financial assets for which an active market does not exist. Specifically, FSP 157-3 addresses the following SFAS No. 157 application issues:

    How the reporting entity's own assumptions (that is, expected cash flows and appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates) should be considered when measuring fair value when relevant observable inputs do not exist.

    How available observable inputs in a market that is not active should be considered when measuring fair value.

    How the use of market quotes (for example, broker quotes or pricing services for the same or similar financial assets) should be considered when assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable inputs available to measure fair value

        The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at January 31, 2009, as required by SFAS 157:

 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Marketable securities

 $ $45,525 $1,767 

        The $1.8 million in Level 3 marketable securities represents two $1.0 million auction rate securities net of temporary impairment charge of $0.2 million. One of these $1.0 million securities failed to sell at its scheduled auction in March 2008. The interest rate of this security reset to a tax-free rate of 6.55%. In May 2008, the remaining $1.0 million security failed to sell at its scheduled auction. The interest rate of this security was reset to a tax-free rate of 3.20%. The next scheduled auction for these securities is in fiscal 2009. Based on market conditions, the Company changed its valuation methodology for auction rate securities to a valuation method based on numerous assumptions including assessments of the underlying structure of each security, expected cash flows, credit ratings, liquidity and other relevant factors during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Accordingly, these securities are classified as Level 3 within SFAS 157's valuation hierarchy since the Company's initial adoption of SFAS 157 at February 3, 2008. These assumptions, assessments and the interpretations of relevant market data are subject to uncertainties, are difficult to predict and require significant judgment. The use of different assumptions, applying different judgment to inherently subjective matters and changes in future market conditions could result in significantly different estimates of fair value.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

        As a result of the temporary declines in fair value for the Company's auction rate securities, which the Company attributes to current liquidity issues rather than credit issues, it has recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $0.2 million to accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2009. The Company believes the current illiquid conditions are temporary in nature and that it has the ability to hold the auction rate securities until liquidity returns to the market. If it is later determined that the fair value of these securities is other than temporarily impaired, the Company will record a loss in the consolidated statement of operations. Due to the Company's belief that the market for these investments may take in excess of twelve months to fully recover, the Company has classified them as noncurrent assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2009.

        The $45.5 million in Level 2 marketable securities includes high credit money market accounts, US treasuries, US government agency securities, certificates of deposit, and municipal bonds traded in the over-the-counter market. Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities or determined using inputs that use as their basis readily observable market data that are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, including third-party pricing services, brokers, and market transactions.

        The following table presents the changes in the Level 3 fair-value category for the year ended January 31, 2009. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments may also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly.

 
 February 2,
2008
 Transfers in
and/or out of
Level 3
 Total unrealized
loss included in
Accumulated
Comprehensive
Income
 January 31,
2009
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Marketable securities

 $ $2,000 $(233)$1,767 

6.8.    Revolving Credit Facility

        We have aOn June 10, 2009, we renewed and amended our secured credit agreement with Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A., and the prior facility agreement was terminated. The credit agreement provides us with a secured revolving credit facility until August 30, 2009September 1, 2011 of up to $25.0 million. This facility replaces our $20.0 million secured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., which terminated effective August 31, 2006. The secured revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of a standby commercial lettersletter of credit in an amount not to exceed $5.0 million outstanding at any time and with a term not to exceed 365 days, althoughdays. The commercial line of credit provides for the issuance of a commercial letter of credit in an amount not to exceed $10.0 million and with terms not to exceed 120 days. The amount of borrowings available at any time under our secured revolving credit facility is reduced by the amount of standby and commercial letters of credit outstanding at that time. There were no outstanding borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility at January 31, 200929, 2011 or February 2, 2008. The CompanyJanuary 30, 2010. We had open commercial letters of credit outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility of approximately $0.3$0.5 million at January 31, 200929, 2011 and approximately $0.5$0.6 million at February 2, 2008.January 30, 2010. The secured revolving credit facility bears interest at floating rates based on the lower of the prime rate (3.25% at January 31, 2009) minus 0.50% or theDaily One Month LIBOR rate (2.00% at January 31, 2009), plus 1.00% for advances over $500,000 for a minimum of 30 days and a maximum of 180 days.. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions and covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things, (1) incur additional debt, (2) undergo


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6. Revolving Credit Facility (Continued)


a change in ownership and (3) enter into certain transactions. The credit agreement also contains financial covenants that require us to meet certain specified financial tests and ratios, including, minimuma maximum net loss not to exceed $10.0 million after taxes on a trailing four-quarter basis provided, that, there shall be added to net income after taxes, maximum total liabilitiesall charges for impairment of goodwill and store assets not to exceed $5.0 million in aggregate, and a minimum quick ratio of 1.25. The quick ratio is defined as our cash and near cash equivalents plus certain defined receivables divided by tangible net worth and minimum quick asset ratio.the outstanding borrowings. All of our personal property, including, among other things, our inventory, equipment and fixtures, has been pledged to secure our obligations under the credit agreement. We must also provide financial information and statements to our lender. We were in compliance with all such covenants at January 31, 2009.29, 2011.

7. Income Taxes

        During fiscal 2007, we adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48. FIN No. 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present,9.    Commitments and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. FIN No. 48 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is "more likely than not" that the position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. Interest recognized in accordance with this Interpretation may be classified in the financial statements as either income taxes or interest expense, based on the accounting policy election of the enterprise. The Company has elected to classify any interest expense recognized under this Interpretation as income taxes. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company's U.S. federal income tax returns are no longer subject to examination for years before fiscal 2006.

        The components of deferred income taxes are:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Deferred tax assets

       
 

Deferred rent

 $7,808 $9,942 
 

Inventory

  2,131  2,133 
 

Employee benefits, including stock based compensation

  2,742  4,424 
 

Other

  456  394 
      

Total deferred tax assets

  13,137  16,893 
      

Deferred tax liabilities;

       
 

Property and equipment

  (8,016) (11,642)
 

Goodwill

  (773) (1,069)
 

Prepaid expenses

  (1,812) (421)
 

Other

    (72)
      

Total deferrred tax liabilities

  (10,601) (13,204)
      
 

Net deferred tax asset

 $2,536 $3,689 
      

Table of ContentsContingencies


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)Leases—

7. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The componentsWe are committed under operating leases for all of our retail store locations and our combined home office and ecommerce fulfillment center generally with terms of five to ten years. Total rent expense, base rent expense and contingent and other rent expense for the provision (benefit) for income taxes are:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Current

          
 

Federal

 $11,870 $14,554 $9,164 
 

State

  2,195  2,616  1,556 
        
  

Total current

  14,065  17,170  10,720 
        

Deferred

          
 

Federal

  (1,110) (1,550) (1,147)
 

State

  (205) (276) (74)
        
  

Total deferred

  (1,315) (1,826) (1,221)
        
  

Provision for income taxes

 $12,750 $15,344 $9,499 
        

        The reconciliation of the income tax provision at the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company's effective income tax ratefiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands). Included in other rent expense are payments of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs.

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011   January 30, 2010   January 31, 2009 

Base rent expense

  $37,140    $35,208    $31,772  

Contingent and other rent expense

   24,660     22,774     21,101  
               

Total rent expense

  $61,800    $57,982    $52,873  
               

At January 29, 2011, we were committed to property owners for operating lease obligations for $347.8 million. A majority of our leases provide for ongoing co-tenancy requirements or early cancellation clauses that would further lower rental rates, or permit lease terminations, or both, in the event that co-tenants cease to operate for specific periods or if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods. Most of the store leases require payment of a specified minimum rent and a contingent rent based on a percentage of the store’s net sales in excess of a specified threshold. Amounts in the table below do not include percentage rent, common area maintenance charges or real estate taxes unless these costs are fixed and determinable. Future minimum commitments on all leases at January 29, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

   Operating Lease
Obligations
 

Fiscal 2011

  $46,721  

Fiscal 2012

   47,013  

Fiscal 2013

   46,750  

Fiscal 2014

   44,975  

Fiscal 2015

   42,329  

Thereafter

   120,013  
     

Total

  $347,801  
     

Purchase CommitmentsAt January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, we had outstanding purchase orders to acquire merchandise from vendors of $76.5 million and $47.6 million, including $0.5 million and $0.6 million of letters of credit outstanding. We have an option to cancel these commitments with no notice prior to shipment, except for private label purchase orders in which we are obligated to repay certain contractual amounts upon cancellation.

Litigation—We are involved from time to time in claims, proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We have made accruals with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in our consolidated financial statements. For some matters, the amount of liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonable estimated and therefore accruals have not been made. We may enter into discussions regarding settlement of these matters, and may enter into settlement agreements, if we believe settlement is in the best interest of the Company’s shareholders.

On March 5, 2008, a former employee commenced an action against the Company in California state court (Evan Johnson v. Zumiez, Inc., et al.,Case No. RG08374968, Alameda County Superior Court, filed March 5, 2008) alleging that we failed to pay all overtime wages owing to him and other employees in California, failed to provide meal breaks as required by California law, failed to provide employees with proper itemized wage statements (pay stubs) as required by California law, and failed to pay terminated employees waiting time penalties under California Labor Code section 203. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement on March 16, 2010, and issued an order granting final approval on July 23, 2010. No class members objected to the settlement and only four class members opted out of the settlement. The total amount of the negotiated settlement is $1.4 million. This entire amount was paid out in settlement awards to the class members, attorneys’ fees and costs, claims administration fees and other payments required by the settlement, with no reversion of unclaimed funds to the Company. This accrued charge was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended:ended January 30, 2010, and was paid out on August 10, 2010.

A putative class action,Chandra Berg et al. v. Zumiez Inc., was filed against the Company in the Los Angeles Superior Court under case number BC408410 on February 25, 2009. The Complaint alleged causes of action for failure to pay overtime wages to present and former store managers in California, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks to store managers, failure to reimburse retail employees for clothing required by the Company’s dress code, failure to reimburse retail employees for business expenses, failure to provide store

managers with accurate itemized wage statements, failure to pay terminated store managers all wages due at the time of termination, unfair business practices and declaratory relief. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on April 2, 2010 which added an additional plaintiff/class representative and a new cause of action for penalties for alleged Labor Code violations under the Private Attorneys General Act. We filed an answer to the First Amended Complaint and conducted discovery. On February 8, 2010, we attended a mediation wherein no settlement was reached. Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification, and we filed our opposition to class certification. Plaintiffs’ reply papers were filed on August 2, 2010. On September 1, 2010, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement to settle. The settlement agreement is $2.1 million, which includes settlement awards to class members, incentive payments to the two plaintiffs, attorneys’ fees and costs and claims administration costs. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement on November 3, 2010, and granted final approval of the settlement on February 23, 2011. The claims administrator will now distribute the settlement funds pursuant to the Court’s order and the settlement agreement. The accrued charge of $2.1 million was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 and was paid out on March 10, 2011.

Insurance Reserves—We are responsible for medical and dental insurance claims up to a specified aggregate amount. We maintain a reserve for estimated medical and dental insurance claims based on historical claims experience and other estimated assumptions. The insurance reserve at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 was $0.4 million and $0.3 million.

10.    Fair Value Measurements

We apply the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Expected U.S. federal income taxes at statutory rates

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State and local income taxes, net of federal effect

  3.8  3.7  3.6 

Permanent differences

  (0.7) (1.1) (1.9)

Other

  (0.2) 0.1  (1.1)
        
 

Effective Tax Rate

  37.9% 37.7% 35.6%
        

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable; and

Level 3—Inputs that are unobservable.

We follow the guidelines for assessing fair value measurements consistent with GAAP that requires an assessment of whether certain factors exist to indicate that the market for an instrument is not active at the measurement date. If, after evaluating those factors, the evidence indicates the market is not active, a company must determine whether recent quoted transaction prices are associated with distressed transactions.

The following tables summarize assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 (in thousands):

   January 29, 2011 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 

Cash equivalents:

      

Money market funds

  $928    $—      $—    

State and local government securities

   —       3,269     —    

Marketable securities:

      

Treasury and agency securities

   —       6,069     —    

State and local government securities

   —       102,170     —    

Variable-rate demand notes

   —       9,205     —    

Long-term investments:

      

State and local government securities

   —       —       870  

Equity method investment

   —       —       1,896  
               

Total assets

  $928    $120,713    $2,766  
               

   January 30, 2010 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 

Cash equivalents:

      

Money market funds

  $487    $—      $—    

Marketable securities:

      

Treasury and agency securities

   —       15,316     —    

State and local government securities

   —       69,785     —    

Variable-rate demand notes

   —       21,382     —    

Long-term investments:

      

State and local government securities

   —       —       872  
               

Total assets

  $487    $106,483    $872  
               

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of hierarchy levels as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.

The Level 2 marketable securities primarily include state and local municipal securities, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Agency securities and variable-rate demand notes. Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities or determined using inputs that use readily observable market data that are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, including third-party pricing services, brokers and market transactions.

The Level 3 state and local government securities at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 represents a $1.0 million par value auction rate security, net of temporary impairment charge of $0.1 million. Our valuation method for the auction rate security is based on numerous assumptions including assessments of the underlying security, expected cash flows, credit ratings, liquidity and other relevant factors. The equity method investment is valued using comparative market multiples adjusted by an estimated discount factor. The assumptions, assessments and the interpretations of relevant market data are subject to uncertainties and are difficult to predict and require significant judgment. The use of different assumptions, applying different judgment to inherently subjective matters and changes in future market conditions could result in significantly different estimates of fair value.

The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 (in thousands):

   State and Local
Government
Securities
  Equity
Investment
 

Balance at January 31, 2009

  $1,767   $—    
         

Sales

   (1,000  —    

Unrealized gain included in accumulated other comprehensive income

   105    —    
         

Balance at January 30, 2010

   872    —    
         

Purchases

   —      2,000  

Unrealized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income

   (2  —    

Unrealized loss included in other income (expense), net

   —      (104
         

Balance at January 29, 2011

  $870   $1,896  
         

The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 (in thousands):

Long-Lived Assets Held and Used

  Fair Value (as of
period end)
   Using Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3
Measurements)
   Net Loss (for
the fiscal year
ended)
 

January 29, 2011

  $117    $117    $105  

January 30, 2010

  $30    $30    $2,538  

During the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, in accordance with the accounting for impairments of long-lived assets classified as held and used, two stores with a net fixed asset carrying amount of $0.2 million were written down to their fair value of $0.1 million, resulting in a net impairment charge of $0.1 million. During the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, 21 stores with a net fixed asset carrying amount of $2.6 million were written down to their fair value of less than $0.1 million, resulting in a net impairment charge of $2.5 million. These non-cash impairment charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow model at a store level. Store impairment expense was recorded net of the remaining tenant allowance. The estimation of future cash flows from operating activities requires significant judgments of factors that include future sales, gross profit and operating expenses. If our actual sales, gross profit or operating expenses differ from our estimates, the carrying value of certain store assets may prove unrecoverable and we may incur additional impairment charges in the future.

8.11.    Equity Awards

        During fiscal 1997 the Company adopted the 1993 Stock Option Plan (the "1993 Plan") to provide for the grantingGeneral Description of nonqualified stock options to executive officers and key employees of the Company as determined by a committee of the Company's board of directors, the 1993 Plan Committee (the "Committee").

        The date of grant, option price, vesting period and other terms specific to options granted under the 1993 Plan are determined by the Committee. All stock options granted under the 1993 Plan vest over a fixed period and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. No additional awards may be granted under the 1993 Plan. Prior to fiscal 2004, the option price for all options granted was equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant.

Equity Awards Plans—During fiscal 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the "2004 Plan"“2004 Plan”) to provide for the granting of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to executive officers and key employees of the Company as determined by the 2004 Plan Committee of the Company'sCompany’s board of directors. The terms of the 2004 Plan are generally the same as the 1993 Plan. The Company has


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8. Equity Awards (Continued)


authorized 7,365,586 split adjusted shares of common stock for issuance under the 2004 Plan. The Company does not plan on making any new stock option grants under the 2004 Plan.

The Company adopted the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan"“2005 Plan”) on January 24, 2005 and the Company'sCompany’s shareholders approved it on April 27, 2005. Unless sooner terminated by the Board, the 2005 Plan will terminate on the day before the tenth anniversary of the date that the 2005 Plan was approved by the Company'sCompany’s shareholders. The 2005 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock bonuses, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights, which may be granted to the Company'sCompany’s employees (including officers), directors and consultants.

The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2005 Plan will not exceed 5,850,000 plus (1) the number of shares that are subject to awards under the 2005 Plan, the 1993 Plan or the 2004 Plan that have been forfeited or repurchased by us or that have otherwise expired or terminated, (2) at our option, the number of shares that were reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan but that were not subject to a grant under such plan at the completion of the Company'sCompany’s initial public offering in May 2005, and (3) an annual increase on the first business day of each fiscal year such that the total number of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan shall equal 15% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on such business day; provided, that with respect to such annual increase, the board may designate a lesser number of additional shares or no additional shares during such fiscal year. In no event, however, will the aggregate number of shares available for award under the 2005 Plan exceed 8,775,000 split adjusted shares. As a result of this limitation on the aggregate number of shares available for award under the 2005 Plan, and the 6,614,594 split adjusted shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock that were reserved for issuance under our 2004 Plan but that were not subject to grants under that plan at the completion of the initial public offering, up to 2,925,000 split adjusted shares, may currently be added to the shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2005 Plan pursuant to clause (2) of the first sentence of this paragraph; however, the Company does not currently intend to add any of those shares to the 2005 Plan.

        During fiscal 2004 the Company issued

Stock Options—On July 21, 2009, we completed an offer to exchange certain employee stock options issued under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (“Exchange Offer”). Certain previously granted stock options were exchanged for new, lower-priced stock options granted on a one and one half-for-one basis (1.5:1). An aggregate of 460,700 previously granted stock options were exchanged for an aggregate of 307,138 new stock options granted pursuant to certain employeesthe Exchange Offer with exercise prices below the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. In accordance with the requirements of APB 25, the Company has recorded stock-based compensation for the difference between thean exercise price of $8.64 per share. The new stock option grants will vest annually over a four-year period beginning on the stock options and the fair market valuefirst anniversary of the Company's stock at the grant date. During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recordeddate granted. The Exchange Offer resulted in a nominal increase in stock-based compensation of approximately $0.2 million each year, respectively, related to these options. Stock-based compensation expense is currently recognized overexpense.

The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the vesting period of the awards, generally five to eight years. Excluding the impact of the adoption of FAS 123R, future compensation expense to be recognized through fiscal 2013 associated with these grants will be $0.2 million.

        There were 160,000, 515,000 and 517,600 stock options granted during fiscal years 2008, 2007ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and 2006, respectively. In addition the Company issued 332,783 shares of restricted stock in fiscal 2008 and 16,000 shares of restricted stock in fiscal 2007. As of January 31, 2009 (in thousands except weighted-average exercise price and February 2, 2008 there were 1,247,658 and 914,100 options to purchase shares of common stock and restricted stock issued and outstanding under the 2005 Plan.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

8. Equity Awards (Continued)weighted-average remaining contractual life):

 

   Stock Options  Grant Date
Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price
   Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in Years)
   Intrinsic
Value (1)
 

Outstanding at February 2, 2008

   1,958   $16.29      
          

Granted

   160   $14.25      

Exercised

   (211 $2.46      

Forfeited

   (114 $28.20      
          

Outstanding at January 31, 2009

   1,793   $17.13      
          

Granted

   528   $8.03      

Exercised

   (258 $1.64      

Forfeited

   (568 $29.50      
          

Outstanding at January 30, 2010

   1,495   $11.88      
          

Granted (2)

   58   $19.13      

Exercised

   (392 $3.70      

Forfeited (3)

   (43 $18.68      
          

Outstanding at January 29, 2011

   1,118   $14.86     6.06    $11,512  
          

Exercisable at January 29, 2011

   466   $19.43     5.43    $3,800  
          

Vested or expected to vest at January 29, 2011 (4)

   1,051   $15.04     6.01    $10,735  
          

(1)Intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the market price of the Company’s common stock on the last business day of the fiscal year and the weighted average exercise price of in-the-money options outstanding at the end of the fiscal year. The market value per share was $22.31 at January 29, 2011.
(2)Includes 307,138 stock options issued pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
(3)Includes 460,700 stock options exchanged in the Exchange Offer.
(4)Includes outstanding vested options as well as outstanding, non-vested options after a forfeiture rate is applied.

The following table summarizes additional information related to stock option activity for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011   January 30, 2010   January 31, 2009 

Weighted-average fair value per share of stock options granted

  $12.24    $4.44    $7.89  

Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in thousands)

  $7,909    $2,489    $3,410  

Vest-date fair value of stock options vested (in thousands)

  $2,094    $1,400    $3,046  

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable options at January 31, 2009:

 
 Options Outstanding Options
Exercisable
 
Exercise Price
 Number of
Options
 Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 Number of
Options
 

$            1.09

  152,144  0.3  152,144 

$            1.78

  311,094  2.6  203,500 

$            3.87

  366,940  5.6  140,208 

$14.00-18.50

  160,000  9.1   

$24.89-27.31

  305,900  7.1  84,567 

$30.52-33.59

  50,000  7.4  33,335 

$35.85-39.05

  432,275  8.2  96,290 

$41.15-41.86

  15,000  8.6  1,875 
         
 

Total

  1,793,353     711,919 
         

9. Related Party Transactions29, 2011:

 

   Options Outstanding   Options
Exercisable
 

Exercise Price

  Number of
Options
(in thousands)
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   Number of
Options
(in thousands)
 
$                 1.78           33     0.6     33  
                3.87           164     3.6     81  
                6.88           202     8.1     42  
                8.64           250     5.7     34  
    14.00-19.23           192     7.7     62  
    27.31-33.59           120     5.2     99  
$     35.85-38.19           157     6.3     115  
            

Total

   1,118       466  
            

Restricted Stock—The Company committed charitable contributions to Zumiez Foundation of approximately $368,000 in fiscal 2008, $581,000 in fiscal 2007 and $537,000 in fiscal 2006. The Company has accrued charitable contributions payable to Zumiez Foundationfollowing table summarizes our restricted stock activity for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 of approximately $250,000, $738,000 and $485,000, respectively. Zumiez Foundation is a charitable based nonprofit organization focused on meeting the various needs of the under-privileged in communities where the Company has retail stores. The Company's Chairman of the Board is also the President of Zumiez Foundation.

10. Commitments and Contingencies(in thousands except weighted-average fair value):

 Leases

   Restricted Stock  Grant Date
Weighted-
Average Fair
Value
   Intrinsic Value (1) 

Outstanding at February 2, 2008

   16   $37.19    
        

Granted

   333   $14.52    

Vested

   (5 $37.54    

Forfeited

   (59 $14.05    
        

Outstanding at January 31, 2009

   285   $15.49    
        

Granted

   450   $7.17    

Vested

   (81 $16.17    

Forfeited

   (32 $9.80    
        

Outstanding at January 30, 2010

   622   $9.67    
        

Granted

   196   $19.19    

Vested

   (195 $10.11    

Forfeited

   (31 $11.99    
        

Outstanding at January 29, 2011

   592   $12.55    $13,213  
        

(1)Intrinsic value for restricted stock is defined as the market value of the outstanding restricted stock on the last business day of the fiscal year. The market value per share was $22.31 at January 29, 2011.

The Company is committed under operating leases for all of its retail store locations. In additionfollowing table summarizes additional information related to minimum future lease payments, substantially all store leases provide for additional rental payments based on sales, as well as common area maintenance charges. In September 2006 the Company entered into a lease agreement for a combined home office and distribution center and an additional 37,000 square feet of warehouse space. This lease agreement terminated and replaced the original fiscal 2004 lease with the Landlord. The new lease agreement provides for an initial lease term of 126 months within which we have an option to extend the lease term for an additional period of five years. For leases that have fixed escalation clauses, minimum rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company expenses escalated percentage rent payments in the period they become known.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        Total rent expense, base rent and contingent rentrestricted stock activity for the threefiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2,200829, 2011, January 30, 2010 and February 3, 2007 (in thousands) are as follows:

 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Base Rent Expense

 $17,692 $24,931 $31,772 

Contingent and Other Rent Expense

  14,205  18,548  21,101 
        
 

Total Rent Expense

 $31,897 $43,479 $52,873 
        

        Future minimum commitments (in thousands) on all leases at January 31, 2009 are as follows:2009:

 
 Retail Stores Home Office Total 

Fiscal 2009

 $37,245 $775 $38,020 

Fiscal 2010

  39,365  795  40,160 

Fiscal 2011

  38,418  816  39,234 

Fiscal 2012

  36,690  847  37,537 

Fiscal 2013

  35,936  869  36,805 

Thereafter

  131,587  3,145  134,732 
        

 $319,241 $7,247 $326,488 
        

 

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011   January 30, 2010   January 31, 2009 

Vest-date fair value of restricted stock vested (in thousands)

  $3,734    $674    $73  

Purchase Commitments—The Company had outstanding purchase orders to acquire merchandise from vendors for approximately $40.0Stock-Based Compensation—We recorded $4.9 million, $4.1 million and $59.6$4.4 million atof total stock-based compensation expense for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 20092009.

At January 29, 2011, there was $6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and February 2, 2008, respectively. These purchases are expected to be financed by cash flows from operations, cash reserves and, if needed, the Company's revolving credit facility. The Companyrestricted stock grants. This cost has an option to cancel such commitments with no notice prior to shipment.

Litigation—On December 10, 2007, a putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated there under. A substantially similar complaint was filed in the same court on December 14, 2007. These cases, which were subsequently consolidated, purport to be brought on behalf of a class of purchasers of the Company's stock during the period March 14, 2007 to November 7, 2007. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on May 5, 2008, extending the class period to January 4, 2008, and alleging that the defendants violated the federal securities laws during thisweighted-average recognition period of time by, among other things, making misrepresentations about the Company's projected financial results in order to artificially inflate the Company's stock price. Plaintiffs are seeking compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, interest, and an award of attorneys' fees and costs.1.1 years.

 On July 21, 2008, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Plaintiffs opposed that motion on September 19, 2008 and defendants filed their reply on October 20, 2008. The motion is fully briefed and oral argument has been requested but not scheduled.

12.Employee Benefit Plans

        In addition, on December 20, 2007, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington (Snohomish County), allegedly on behalf of and for the benefit of the Company, against certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers. The Company


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)


was named as a nominal defendant. The derivative complaint is based on the same allegations of fact as in the securities class action, and claims that the defendant directors and officers breached fiduciary duties, abused their control, engaged in gross mismanagement, wasted corporate assets, unjustly enriched themselves, and engaged in insider trading. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, restitution, disgorgement of profits, equitable and injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses. Because the complaint is derivative in nature it does not seek monetary damages from the Company. However, the Company may be required throughout the pendency of the action to advance the legal fees and costs incurred by the defendant directors and officers. Under the terms of its corporate bylaws and related indemnity agreements, the Company is obligated to indemnify all current and former officers and directors involved in civil, criminal, or investigative matters, in connection with their service. The Company is also obligated to advance fees and expenses, but only if the involved officer or director acted in "good faith." There is no limit on the indemnification payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions. At this time, the Company does not believe that any potential fees or expense arising from officer and director indemnification will be material.

        On April 28, 2008, Zumiez moved to dismiss the derivative complaint for failure to make a demand on Zumiez's Board of Directors. Plaintiff filed his response on June 27, 2008. Before Zumiez was to file its reply, it agreed with the plaintiff to stay the derivative action pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss in the federal securities action. On August 3, 2008 the court overseeing the derivative litigation approved the stay.

        The Company is unable to predict the outcome of these cases. A court determination in any of these actions against the Company could result in significant liability and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition.

        On March 5, 2008, a former employee commenced an action against the Company in California state court (Evan Johnson v. Zumiez, Inc., et al., Case No. RG08374968, Alameda County Superior Court) alleging that the Company failed to pay all overtime wages owing to him and other employees, failed to provide meal breaks as required by California law, failed to provide employees with proper itemized wage statements (pay stubs) as required by California law, and failed to pay terminated employees waiting time penalties under California Labor Code section 203. On April 28, 2008, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint which adds an additional claim that employees under age 18 worked more hours than permitted by the Labor Code; the first amended complaint also seeks to recover penalties under the Private Attorney General Act for alleged violation of various Labor Code sections. The Company filed an answer to the first amended complaint on May 20, 2008, denying the allegations of the complaint and asserting affirmative defenses. The parties are engaged in discovery. The suit was filed as a putative class action, but no motion requesting certification of the case as a class action has been filed. No trial date has been set. At this early stage of the case, it is not possible to estimate the amount or range of potential loss with any degree of certainty.

Insurance Reserves—The Company is responsible for medical and dental insurance claims up to a specified aggregate amount. The Company maintains a reserve for estimated medical and dental insurance claims based on historical claims experience and other estimated assumptions.

Employment Agreement—The Company has an employment agreement in place with a key employee. The agreement provides that if the Company terminates the employee's employment without cause or if he terminates his employment for good reason, the employee could be entitled to continue to receive his base salary for a time period not to exceed eighteen months.


Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

11. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

        In connection with the acquisition of Action Concepts Fast Forward, Ltd., on June 24, 2006 the Company recorded goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations." The Company had $250,000 of cash held in escrow that was payable to Action Concepts Fast Forward, Ltd as of February 2, 2008 and no restricted cash held for the year ended January 31, 2009. The Company recorded $13.2 million of goodwill as the excess of the purchase price of $15.5 million over the fair value of the net amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," the Company will continue to assess, in accordance with our "goodwill" policy as stated in Note 2, whether goodwill is impaired.

        On September 16, 2008 the Company acquired the assets of an Island Snow store from Kodama Incorporated located in Honolulu, Hawaii. In connection with the purchase, the Company entered into a noncompetition agreement for which the Company paid $100,000, and recorded an intangible asset in accordance with SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations." Under this agreement, Kodama Incorporated agreed not to compete with Zumiez for a period of two years. The Company will amortize the non-compete agreement over the term of the agreement.

12. Employee Benefit Plans

The Zumiez Investment Plan (Z.I.P.) is a qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees that have been with the Company for a year, work an average of thirty hours a week and are twenty-one or older are eligible to participate in the Z.I.P. The Company'sOur 401(k) matching and profit-sharing contributions are discretionary and are determined annually by the Company. The Company contributed $250,000management. We committed $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million to the plan for each of the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007.2009.

        The Company offersWe offer an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"“ESPP”) for eligible employees to purchase the Company'sCompany’s common stock at a 15% discount of the lesser of fair market value of the stock on the first business day or the last business day of the offering period. The ESPP provides for six month offering periods commencing on October 1 and April 1 of each year. Employees can contribute up to 15% of their pay but may not exceed $25,000 of aggregate stock value in a calendar year. The maximum number of shares an employee may purchase during an offering period is 2,000 shares. Employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP if they work at least 20 hours a week and at least five months in a calendar year.

13. Net Income per Share, Basic

13.Income Taxes

The components of deferred income taxes at January 29, 2011 and DilutedJanuary 30, 2010 are (in thousands):

 Basic net

   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Deferred rent

  $12,172   $11,496  

Employee benefits, including stock based compensation

   6,001    5,547  

Accrued liabilities

   1,783    1,158  

Inventory

   897    1,945  

Other

   333    167  
         

Total deferred tax assets

   21,186    20,313  
         

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Property and equipment

   (10,986  (9,973

Goodwill and other intangibles

   (1,714  (1,422

Other

   (365  (336
         

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (13,065  (11,731
         

Net deferred tax asset

  $8,121   $8,582  
         

The components of the provision for income per sharetaxes for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 are (in thousands):

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010  January 31, 2009 

Current:

    

Federal

  $11,813   $7,760   $9,164  

State

   2,324    2,002    1,556  
             

Total current

   14,137    9,762    10,720  
             

Deferred:

    

Federal

   662    (3,872  (1,147

State

   (147  (1,014  (74
             

Total deferred

   515    (4,886  (1,221
             

Provision for income taxes

  $14,652   $4,876   $9,499  
             

The reconciliation of the income tax provision at the U.S. federal statutory rate to our effective income tax rate is based onas follows for the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted netfiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010  January 31, 2009 

Expected U.S. federal income taxes at statutory rates

   35.0  35.0  35.0

State and local income taxes, net of federal effect

   3.4    4.6    3.6  

Tax exempt interest

   (1.2  (2.9  (1.9

Other

   0.5    (1.9  (1.1
             

Effective tax rate

   37.7  34.8  35.6
             

The Company files income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period. Common share equivalents includedtax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns are no longer subject to examination for years before fiscal 2007.

14.Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income represents all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011  January 30, 2010  January 31, 2009 

Net income

  $24,203   $9,131   $17,204  

Net change in unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments, net of tax of $76, $7 and $213

   (118  (16  (347
             

Comprehensive income

  $24,085   $9,115   $16,857  
             

15.Earnings per Share, Basic and Diluted

The following table sets forth the computation represent shares issuable upon assumed exercise of outstanding stock options, employee stock option funds held to acquire stockbasic and non-vested restricted stock. Potentially anti-dilutive securities not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share includes options to purchase common stock where the option exercise price is greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock during the period reported. (in thousands, except per share amounts):

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   January 29, 2011   January 30, 2010   January 31, 2009 

Net income

  $24,203    $9,131    $17,204  

Weighted average common shares for basic earnings per share

   29,971     29,499     29,127  

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock

   823     634     567  
               

Weighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share

  $30,794    $30,133    $29,694  
               

Basic earnings per share

  $0.81    $0.31    $0.59  
               

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.79    $0.30    $0.58  
               

Total anti-dilutive common stock options not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share were 814,175, 130,000,0.3 million, 0.4 million and 40,0000.8 million for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, February2009.

16.Exit or Disposal Activities

On March 2, 2008,2010, we acquired a 168,450 square foot building in Corona, California for $11.8 million and February 3, 2007, respectively.we have relocated our distribution facility from Everett, Washington to this facility. We believe that we will be more effective distributing our products through a distribution center located in Corona, California due to the majority of our vendors being located in Southern California. In July 2010, we entered into an amendment of the lease for our combined home office, ecommerce fulfillment center and the exited distribution facility in Everett, Washington, which terminated our lease commitments for a portion of the leased space in exchange for additional charges to be paid over the life of the remaining lease period. The lease termination costs recorded reflect the present value of these future charges.


In conjunction with the closure of the Everett, Washington distribution facility, during the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, we have recorded $0.9 million of employee benefit costs (severance and performance bonuses), $0.6 million of lease termination costs and $0.8 million of other costs to exit the facility. Additionally, we incurred a $0.3 million charge on disposal of long-lived assets and we recognized a $0.2 million benefit related to deferred rent liability. These amounts are included in cost of goods sold on the consolidated statements of operations. We do not expect to incur material additional costs related to the relocation.

Exit or disposal provisions recorded during the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 as a result of this relocation are as follows (in thousands):

   January 30, 2010   Additions   Payments  Adjustments (1)  January 29, 2011 (2) 

Employee benefit costs

  $—      $882    $(876 $9   $15  

Lease termination costs

   —       1,051     (305  (453  293  

Other exit costs

   —       806     (806  —      —    
                       

Total

  $—      $2,739    $(1,987 $(444 $308  
                       

(1)The lease termination cost adjustment primarily represents the difference between the calculated lease termination cost as a result of the amended lease and our initial estimate of lease termination costs recorded on the cease use date.
(2)The exit or disposal provisions are included in accrued payroll and payroll taxes, other liabilities and long-term other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

17.Related Party Transactions

We committed charitable contributions to Zumiez Foundation of $0.6 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million for fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009. We have accrued charitable contributions payable to Zumiez Foundation at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 of $0.6 million and $0.2 million. Zumiez Foundation is a charitable based nonprofit organization focused on meeting the various needs of the under-privileged in communities where we have retail stores. The Company’s Chairman of the Board is also the President of Zumiez Foundation.

Table of Contents


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. Net Income per Share, Basic and Diluted (Continued)EXHIBIT INDEX

 The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):

 
 Fiscal Year ended 
 
 February 3,
2007
 February 2,
2008
 January 31,
2009
 

Net income

 $20,856 $25,326 $17,204 

Weighted average common shares for basic net income per share

  27,542,891  28,608,818  29,126,889 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock

  1,160,146  713,519  567,223 
        

Weighted average common shares for diluted net income per share

  28,703,037  29,322,337  29,694,112 
        

Basic net income per share

 $0.76 $0.89 $0.59 
        

Diluted net income per share

 $0.73 $0.86 $0.58 
        

        Options to purchase 814,175 shares of common stock with a weighted average value of $32.54 per share were outstanding at the end of fiscal 2008 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise price was greater than the $14.53 average market price for the Company's common shares.

14. Subsequent Event—Pending Litigation

        A putative class action,Chandra Berg v. Zumiez Inc., was filed against the Company in the Los Angeles Superior Court under case number BC408410 on February 25, 2009. The action alleges causes of action for failure to pay overtime wages to present and former store managers in California, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks to store managers, failure to reimburse retail employees for clothing required by the Company's dress code, failure to reimburse retail employees for business expenses, failure to provide store managers with accurate itemized wage statements, failure to pay terminated store managers all wages due at the time of termination, unfair business practices and declaratory relief. The case has not yet been served on the Company.


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1  Articles of Incorporation. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


3.2
  

Bylaws. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 20082008]


4.1
  

Form of Common Stock Certificate of Zumiez Inc. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.1
  

Business Loan Agreement dated May 29, 2003 between Bank of America, N.A. and Zumiez Inc., as modified by Loan Modification Agreement dated September 30, 2004. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.2
  

Lease Agreement between Merrill Creek Holdings, LLC and Zumiez Inc. dated August 2, 2004. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.3


Executive Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2002 between Zumiez Inc. and Richard M. Brooks. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]

10.4

10.4


Carrier Agreement between United Parcel Service Inc. and Zumiez Inc. dated July 4, 2005. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company'sCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005 as filed on September 13, 2005]


10.5


Zumiez Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]

10.6

10.6


Zumiez Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.7
  

Zumiez Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.8
  

Zumiez Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.9
  

Form of Indemnity Agreement between Zumiez Inc. and each of its officers and directors. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.10
  

Limited Liability Company Agreement of Zumiez Holdings LLC. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-122865)]


10.11
  

Modification dated May 11, 2005 to Business Loan Agreement dated May 29, 2003 between Bank of America, N.A. and Zumiez Inc., as modified by Loan Modification Agreement dated September 30, 2004. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company'sCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005 as filed on September 13, 2005]


10.12
  

Equity Purchase Agreement with Gerald R. Anderson, Brandon C. Batton, AC Fast Forward LLC and AC Fast Forward Mgt., LLC dated May 16, 2006. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company'sCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 29, 2006 as filed on September 12, 2006]

Table of Contents

10.13  Lease Agreement between Merrill Creek Holdings, LLC and Zumiez Inc. dated October 2, 2006. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2006]


10.14
10.15
  

Zumiez Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 27, 2009. [Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.15 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on June 1, 2009]
10.16Credit Agreement, including Revolving Line of Credit Note, with Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A. dated September 1, 2006.June 10, 2009. [Incorporated by reference tofrom Exhibit 10.1410.16 to the Company's Quarterly ReportForm 8-K filed by the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2006 as filed on December 8, 2006]June 11, 2009]


21.1
10.17
  

Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions with Railroad Street Land Holdings, LLC dated February 18, 2010. [incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.17 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 22, 2010]


21.1Subsidiaries of the Company. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2005 (file No. 333-129101)]


23.1
  

Consent of Moss Adams LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


31.1
  

Certification of the ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


31.2
  

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 20022002.


32.1
  

Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 13501350.

Copies of Exhibits may be obtained upon request directed to the attention of our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, 6300 Merrill Creek Parkway, Suite B, Everett, WA 98203, and are available at the SEC'sSEC’s website found at www.sec.gov.