Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


(Mark One)

 

 
þý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009



or
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012



or

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from                                    to                                   

Commission File Number: 0-21531

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware


05-0376157
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 05-0376157
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, RI 02908
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(401) 528-8634

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)Title of the Act:
each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

          Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þý No o

          Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þý

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þý No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes oý No o

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant'sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer þý Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer o
(Do (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller Reporting Company o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þý

          The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $667,268,501$2,172,850,421 based upon the closing price of the registrant's common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market® on January 30, 2009.27, 2012. The number of shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of September 10, 20096, 2012 was 43,236,752.49,015,833.


Table of Contents


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on January 13, 2010December 12, 2012 are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section  
 Page

Part I

    


Item 1.


 


Business


 


1

Item 1A.


 

Risk Factors


12

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments


18

Item 2.

Properties


18

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings


19

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


19

Executive Officers of the Registrant


 

20
14


Item 1A.



Risk Factors




17


Item 1B.



Unresolved Staff Comments




26


Item 2.



Properties




26


Item 3.



Legal Proceedings




27


Item 4.



Mine Safety Disclosures




27


Part II


 

 

 

 


Item 5.


 


Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


 

22
28


Item 6.


 


Selected Consolidated Financial Data


 

24
30


Item 7.


 


Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


 

25
31


Item 7A.


 


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


 

40
48


Item 8.


 


Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


 

41
49


Item 9.


 


Changes in and Disagreements withWith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


 

73
83


Item 9A.


 


Controls and Procedures


 

73
83


Item 9B.


 


Other Information


 

74
84


Part III


 

 

 

 


Item 10.


 


Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


 

75
85


Item 11.


 


Executive Compensation


 

75
85


Item 12.


 


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


 

75
85


Item 13.


 


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


 

75
86


Item 14.


 


Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services


 

76
86


Part IV


 

 

 

 


Item 15.


 


Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules


 

76
87



 


Signatures


 

77
88

Table of Contents


PART I.

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

        Unless otherwise specified, references to "United Natural Foods," "we," "us," "our" or "the Company" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report" or "Report") mean United Natural Foods, Inc. and all entities included in our consolidated financial statements. See the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Report for information regarding our financial performance.

Overview

        We believe we are athe leading national distributor based on sales of natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products in the United States.States and Canada, and that our twenty-six distribution centers, representing approximately 6.2 million square feet of warehouse space, provide us with the largest capacity of any North American-based distributor in the natural, organic and specialty products industry. We carryoffer more than 60,00065,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products, consisting of national, brand, regional brand,and private label and master distribution products,brands in six product categories: grocery and general merchandise, produce, perishables and frozen foods, nutritional supplements and sports nutrition, bulk and food servicefoodservice products and personal care items. We serve more than 17,00023,000 customer locations primarily located across the United States the majority ofand Canada which can be classified into one of the following categories: as follows:

        We were the first organic food distribution network in the United States designated as a "Certified Organic Distributor" by Quality Assurance International, Inc. ("QAI"), an organic certifying agency accredited by the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA"). This process involved a comprehensive review by QAI of our operating and purchasing systems and procedures. This certification covers all of our broadline distribution centers in the United States, except for our recently completed facilityprimarily specialty products distribution center in York, Pennsylvania, which we anticipate will be tested during October 2009, andLeicester, Massachusetts. Four of our UNFI Specialty Distribution centers.

        We have beenCanadian distribution centers are certified organic by either QAI or Ecocert Canada, while the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market, for more than 11 years. Our relationship with Whole Foods Market was expanded to cover the former Wild Oats Markets, Inc. ("Wild Oats Market") stores retained by Whole Foods Market following Whole Foods Market's merger with Wild Oats Markets in August 2007. We had served as the primary distributor of natural and organicremaining Canadian distribution center sells only Kosher foods and non-food products to Wild Oats Market prior tois therefore not certified organic.

        Since the merger. The Henry's and Sun Harvest stores divested by Whole Foods Market, and acquired by a subsidiary of Smart & Final Inc., remain our customers.

        On November 2, 2007, we acquired Distribution Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Millbrook Distribution Services, Inc. ("DHI"), which we now refer to as UNFI Specialty Distribution Services ("UNFI Specialty"). Through UNFI Specialty, we distribute specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher, gourmet, organic and natural foods), health and beauty care items and other non-food items. We believe that the acquisition of DHI accomplishes certainformation of our strategic objectives, including acceleratingpredecessor in 1976, we have grown our expansion intobusiness both organically and through acquisitions which have expanded our distribution network, product selection and customer base. Since fiscal 2002, our net sales have increased at a numbercompounded annual growth rate ("CAGR") of high-growth business segments and establishing immediate market share in the fast-growing specialty foods market. We believe that UNFI Specialty's customer base enhances our conventional supermarket business channel and that our complementary product lines present opportunities for cross-selling. See "—Our Operating Structure—Wholesale Division" for further information regarding this acquisition and our specialty distribution business.

16.1%. In recent years, our sales to existing and new customers have increased through the continued growth of the natural and organic products industry in general,general; our efforts to increase the number of conventional supermarket customers to whom we distribute products; increased market share as a result ofthrough our high-quality service and broader product selection, including specialty products, and the acquisition of, or merger with, natural organic, and specialty products distributors,product distributors; the expansion of our existing distribution centers,centers; the construction of new distribution centerscenters; the introduction of new products and the development of our own line of natural and organic branded products. Through these efforts, we believe that we have been able to broadenbroadened our geographic penetration, expandexpanded our customer base, enhanceenhanced and diversifydiversified our product selectionsselection and increaseincreased our market share.

        We also ownhave been the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market for more than fourteen years. Effective June 2010, we amended our distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market to extend the term of the agreement for an additional seven years. Under the terms of the amended agreement, we will continue to serve as the primary wholesale natural grocery distributor to Whole Foods Market in


Table of Contents

its United States regions where we were serving as the primary distributor at the time of the amendment. The amendment extended the expiration date of the agreement from September 25, 2013 to September 25, 2020. On July 28, 2010, we announced that we had entered into an asset purchase agreement under which we agreed to acquire certain assets of Whole Foods Market Distribution, Inc. ("Whole Foods Distribution"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Whole Foods Market, previously used for their self-distribution of non-perishables in their Rocky Mountain and Southwest regions, and to become the primary distributor in these regions. We closed this transaction in late September 2010 in the case of the Southwest region and early October 2010 in the case of the Rocky Mountain region. We now serve as the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market in all of its regions in the United States, and have amended our distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market effective October 11, 2010 to include these regions.

        In June 2010, we acquired certain Canadian food distribution assets (the "SDG assets") of the SunOpta Distribution Group business ("SDG") of SunOpta Inc. ("SunOpta"), through our wholly-owned subsidiary, UNFI Canada, Inc. ("UNFI Canada") for cash consideration of $65.8 million. With the acquisition, we became the largest distributor of natural, organic and specialty foods, including kosher foods, in Canada. This was a strategic acquisition as UNFI Canada provided us with an immediate platform for growth in the Canadian market. During fiscal 2012, we utilized our UNFI Canada platform to further expand in the Canadian market, including through our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of a specialty food distribution business in the Ontario market in November 2011.

        The ability to distribute specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher and gourmet) has accelerated our expansion into a number of high-growth business markets and allowed us to establish immediate market share in the fast-growing specialty foods market. We have now integrated specialty food products and natural and organic specialty non-food items into most of our broadline distribution centers across the United States and Canada. Due to our expansion into specialty foods, over the past three fiscal years we have been awarded new business with a number of conventional supermarkets that previously had not done business with us because we did not distribute specialty products. We believe that the distribution of these products enhances our conventional supermarket business channel and that our complementary product lines continue to present opportunities for cross-selling.

        On June 9, 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with L&R Distributors, Inc. ("L&R Distributors") pursuant to which we agreed to sell our conventional non-foods and general merchandise lines of business, including certain inventory related to these product lines. This divestiture was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and has allowed us to concentrate on our core business of the distribution of natural, organic, and specialty foods and non-food products. As a result of this divestiture, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $5.8 million related to land, building and equipment at our Harrison, Arkansas facility during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. During fiscal 2012, we recognized severance and other expenses related to this divestiture of approximately $5.1 million. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we sold the Harrison, Arkansas facility to a third party. See "Our Operating Structure—Wholesale Division" for further information regarding our distribution business.

        We operate 13thirteen natural products retail stores within the United States, located primarily in Florida (with two locations in Maryland and one in Massachusetts), through our subsidiary Natural Retail Group, Inc.doing business as Earth Origins Market ("NRG"Earth Origins"). We also operate one natural products retail store, Drive Organics, in Vancouver, British Columbia. We believe that our retail business serves as a natural complement to our distribution business because it enables us to develop new marketing programs and improve customer service. In addition, our subsidiary doing business as Woodstock Farms Manufacturing specializes in the international importation, roasting, packaging and distribution of nuts, dried fruit, seeds, trail mixes, granola, natural and organic snack items and confections.


Table of Contents


In addition, our United Natural Trading Co. subsidiary, which does business as Woodstock Farms, and was previously known as Hershey Imports Company, specializes in the international importation, roasting and packaging of nuts, seeds, dried fruits and snack items.

        We are a Delaware corporation based in Providence, Rhode Island, and we conduct business through our various wholly owned subsidiaries. We operated twentytwenty-six distribution centers at 20092012 fiscal year end. Weend, and we believe that our approximately 6.2 million square feet of distribution centersspace provide us with the largest capacity of any distributor in theof natural, organic and specialty products industry. We have increasedin the United States or Canada. In April 2012, we entered into a lease for a new 535,000 square foot facility in Aurora, Colorado to replace our two existing broadline distribution capacity to approximately 6.3 million square feet.

        Unless otherwise specified, references to "United Natural Foods," "we," "us," "our" or "the Company" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include our consolidated subsidiaries. We operate in one reportable segment, the wholesale segment. See the financial statementscenters and notes thereto included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Report for information regarding our financial performance.an Albert's Organics, Inc. ("Albert's") distribution center.

The Natural Products Industry

        The natural products industry encompasses a wide range of products in addition to food products (includingincluding organic foods). These other product categories includeand non-organic foods, nutritional, herbal and sports supplements;supplements, toiletries and personal care items;items, naturally-based cosmetics;cosmetics, natural/homeopathic medicines;medicines, pet products and cleaning agents. According to the June 2009 issue ofThe Natural Foods Merchandiser, a leading trade publication for the natural products industry trade publication, sales for all types of natural products rose to $68.0were $90.8 billion in 2008, an increasecalendar 2011, a growth of $8.2 billion or approximately 9.0% over 2007.9.9% from 2010. According to theThe Natural Foods MerchandiserNational Association for the Specialty Food Trade, this increasea leading specialty food industry trade publication, sales in sales, from a total dollar perspective, was driven primarily bycalendar 2011 were $75.1 billion. We believe the growth in the following categories:

        The fastest growing categories, although not necessarily the largest dollar volume categories, inrate of the natural products industry were pet products, housewares, fresh meat/seafoodhas outpaced the growth of the overall food-at-home industry as a result of the increasing demand by consumers for a healthy lifestyle, food safety and beer/wine.environmental sustainability.

Our Operating Structure

        Our operations are comprised of three principal operating divisions. These operating divisions are:

        Our broadline distribution business is organized into twothree regions—our Eastern Region, our Western Region and our Western Region.Canadian region. We distribute natural, organic and organicspecialty products in all of our product categories to


Table of Contents

customers in the Eastern and Midwestern portions of the United States through our Eastern Region and to customers in the Western and Central portions of the United States through our Western Region. Our Canadian Region distributes natural, organic and specialty products in all of our product categories to all of our customers in Canada. As of our 20092012 fiscal year end, our Eastern Region operates sevenoperated eight distribution centers, which provideprovided approximately 2.63.1 million square feet of warehouse space, our Western Region operated nine distribution centers, which provided approximately 2.5 million square feet of warehouse space and our WesternCanadian Region operates sixoperated five distribution centers, which provideprovided approximately 2.00.3 million square feet of warehouse space.

        We acquired our specialty distribution business through our acquisition of DHI on November 2, 2007. Our UNFI Specialty division operates distribution centers located in Massachusetts and Arkansas, which provide approximately 1.4 million square feet of warehouse space, serving customers throughout the United States. We have also begun the integration of UNFI Specialty and specialty products are now being sold through several of our broadline distribution centers. Through our specialty distribution division, we distribute specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher, gourmet, organic and natural foods), health and beauty care items and other non-food items.

        Through Albert's, we distribute organically grown produce and non-produce perishables, such as organic milk, dressings, eggs, juices, poultry and various other refrigerated specialty items. Albert's


Table of Contents

operates out of sixseven distribution centers providing approximately 0.2 million square feet of warehouse space, strategically located in all regions of the United States, and is designated as a "Certified Organic Distributor" by QAI.

        Through Select Nutrition, we distribute more than 14,000 health and beauty aids, vitamins, minerals and supplements from distribution centers in CaliforniaPennsylvania and Pennsylvania.California.

        Certain of our distribution centers are shared by multiple operations inwithin our wholesale division.

        We own and operate 13thirteen natural products retail stores through Earth Origins within the United States, nine of which are located primarily in Florida, (with two locations in Maryland and one in Massachusetts), through NRG.Massachusetts. We also operate a natural products retail store in Vancouver, British Columbia that is reflected within our wholesale division. We believe that our retail business serves as a natural complement to our distribution business because it enables us to develop new marketing programs and improve customer service.

        We believe our natural products retail stores have a number of advantages over their competitors, including our financial strength and marketing expertise, the purchasing power resulting from group purchasing by stores within NRGEarth Origins and the breadth of our product selection.

        We believe that we benefit from certain advantages in acting as a distributor to our natural products retail stores, including our ability to:

        Additionally, as the primary natural products distributor to our retail locations, we realize significant economies of scale and operating and buying efficiencies. As an operator of natural products retail stores, we also have the ability to test market select products prior to offering them nationally. We can then evaluate consumer reaction to the product without incurring significant inventory risk. We also are able to test new marketing and promotional programs within our stores prior to offering them to our broaderwholesale customer base.

        Our subsidiary, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, specializes in the international importation, roasting, packaging and packagingdistribution of nuts, dried fruit, seeds, dried fruitstrail mixes, granola, natural and organic snack items.items and confections. We sell these items in bulk in our own packaged


Table of Contents

snack lines, EXPRESSnacks, Woodfield Farms and Woodstock Farms, and through private label packaging arrangements we have established with large health food, supermarket and convenience store chains.chains and independent owners. We operate our manufacturing operations out of aan organic (USDA and QAI) and kosher (Circle K) certified packaging, roasting, and processing facility in New Jersey and a warehouse in Los Angeles, California.Jersey.

        Our Blue Marble Brands product lines address certain needs or preferences of customers of our wholesale division, which are not otherwise being met by other suppliers. We carry over 2015 brand names, representing over 700600 unique products. Our Blue Marble Brands products are sold through our wholesale division, through third-party distributors in the natural, organic and specialty industry and directly to retailers. Our Field Day® brand is only sold to customers in our independent natural products retailer channel (or "independent retailers"), and is meant to serve as a private label brand for independent retailers to allow them to compete with conventional supermarkets which often have their own private label store brands.


Table of Contents

Our Competitive AdvantagesStrengths

        We believe that we benefitdistinguish ourselves from a number of significant competitive advantages, includingour competitors through the following.following strengths:

        We believe that we are the largest distributor of natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products by sales in the United States and Canada, and one of the few distributors capable of meeting the natural, organic and specialty product needs of local and regional customers, as well asconventional supermarket chains, and the rapidly growing national supernatural and supermarket chains.chain. The opening of our facility in Lancaster, Texas in September 2010 marked the extension of our distribution presence to a nation-wide level. We believe we havethat our network of twenty-six distribution centers (including five in Canada) creates significant advantages over smaller and regional natural, organicdistributors. Our nationwide presence across the United States and specialty products distributors as a result of our ability to:

same day or next day on-time deliveries.

        In addition toWe believe that our scale affords us significant benefits within a highly fragmented industry including volume purchasing opportunities a critical component of being an efficient distributor is our management ofand warehouse and distribution costs.efficiencies. Our continued growth has created the needallowed us to expand our existing facilities and open new facilities as we seek to achieve maximum operating efficiencies, including by reducingreduced fuel and other transportation costs, and to assure adequate spacehas created sufficient capacity for future needs.growth. Recent efficiency improvements include the centralization of general and administrative functions, the consolidation of systems applications among physical locations and regions and the optimization of customer distribution routes, all of which reduced expenses. We have made significant capital expendituresinvestments in our people, facilities, equipment and have incurred considerable expenses in connection withtechnology to broaden our footprint and enhance the opening and expansionefficiency of distribution facilities. We opened our Sarasota, Florida warehouseoperations. Key examples in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 in order to reducelast three years include the geographic area served by our Atlanta, Georgia facility. Our 237,000 square foot distribution center in Ridgefield, Washington commenced operations in December 2007 and serves as a regional distribution hub for customers in Portland, Oregon and other Northwest markets. Our 613,000 square foot distribution center in Moreno Valley, California commenced operations in September 2008 and serves our customers in Southern California, Arizona, Southern Nevada, Southern Utah, and Hawaii. Our newly leased, 675,000 square foot distribution center in York, Pennsylvania commenced operations in January 2009, and replaces our New Oxford, Pennsylvania facility serving customers in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia. In April 2009, we successfully relocated our UNFI Specialty distribution facility in East Brunswick, New Jersey to our York, Pennsylvania distribution center, creating our first fully integrated facility offering a full assortment of natural, organic, and specialty foods. following:

        We serve more than 17,000 customer locations primarily located acrossThroughout the United States. We36 years of our, and our predecessors' operations, we have developed long-standing customer relationships, which we believe are among the strongest in our industry. In particular, we have been the primary supplier of natural and organic products to the largest


Table of Contents

supernatural chain in the United States, Whole Foods Market, for more than eleven14 years.

A key driver of our strong customer loyalty is our superior service levels, which include accurate fulfillment of orders, timely product delivery, competitive prices and a high level of product marketing support. Our average distribution in-stock service level for fiscal 2009 was approximately 98%, which we believe is the highest in our industry. Distribution service levels refer to2012, measured as the percentage of items ordered by customers that are delivered by the requested delivery date excluding manufacturers' "out of stocks."(excluding manufacturer out-of-stocks and discontinued items), was approximately 98%. We believe that our high distribution service levels are attributable to our experienced purchasing departments and sophisticated warehousing, inventory control and distribution systems. WeFurthermore, we offer next-day delivery service to a majority of our active customers and offer multiple deliveries each week to our largest customers. Wecustomers, which we believe that customer loyalty is dependent upon excellent customer service, including accurate fulfillmentdifferentiates us from many of orders, timely product delivery, competitive prices and a high level of product marketing support.our competitors.

        Our management team has extensive experience in the retail and distribution business, including the natural, organic and specialty product industries. On average, each of our eleven executive officers has over nineteen years of experience in the retail, natural products industries and has been successful in identifying, consummating and integrating multiple acquisitions. Since 2000, we have successfully completed seven acquisitions of distributors, manufacturers and suppliers, two acquisitions of retail stores and eleven acquisitions of branded product lines.or food distribution industry. In addition, we believe our executive officers and directors, andemployee base is highly motivated as our Employee Stock Ownership Trust beneficially own in the aggregateowns approximately 6.7%4.2% of our outstanding common stock. AFurthermore, a significant portion of our management-level employees' compensation is equity based or performance based, and, therefore, there is a substantial incentive to continue to generate strong growth in operating results in the future.

Our Growth Strategy

        Our growth strategy isWe seek to maintain and enhance our position as a leading national distributor towithin the natural and organic industry in the United States and Canada and to increase our market share in the specialty products industry. Since our formation, we have grown our business organically and through the acquisition of a number of distributors and suppliers, which has expanded our distribution network, product selection and customer base. For example, we acquired our Albert's, NRGEarth Origins, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, and Woodstock Farmsspecialty businesses, and during fiscal 2008,2010, we acquired DHI, the sourceassets that comprise UNFI Canada.

        Beginning in fiscal 2009, our strategic plan has focused on increasing market share, particularly in our conventional supermarket channel. This channel typically generates lower gross margins than our independent retailer channel, but also typically has lower operating expenses. Our strategic plan also includes the roll-out of a national warehouse management and procurement system upgrade, which was launched in our Lancaster, Texas distribution center in September 2010 and subsequently implemented in our Ridgefield, Washington distribution center in July 2012. We expect this system to be rolled out in all of our specialty distribution business.centers by the end of fiscal 2015. These steps and others are intended to promote operational efficiencies and further reduce our operating expenses to offset the lower gross margins associated with increased sales to the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels.

        To implement our growth strategy, we intend to continue to increaseincreasing our leading market share of the growing natural and organic products industry by expanding our customer base, increasing our share of existing customers' business and continuing to expand and further penetrate new distribution territories, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic, Southern Pennsylvania and South Central United States markets.territories. We plan to expand our presence within the specialty industry by offering new and existing customers a single wholesale distributor capable of meeting their specialty and natural and organic product needs on a national or regional basis. Key elements of our strategy include:

        As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, we served more than 17,00023,000 customer locations primarily located throughoutin the United States.States and Canada. We plan to continue expandingexpand our coverage of the highly fragmented natural and organic and specialty products industry by cultivating new customer relationships within the industry and by further developing other channels of distribution, such as traditional supermarkets, mass market outlets, institutional food service providers, international, buying clubs, hotels and gourmet stores.


Table of Contents

developing our existing channels of distribution, such as independent natural products retailers, conventional supermarkets, mass market outlets, institutional foodservice providers, buying clubs and gourmet stores. With the coordinated distribution of our specialty products with our natural and organic products, which commenced with the integration of our York, Pennsylvania facility in April 2009, we believe that we have the opportunity to continue gaining market share in the conventional supermarket channel as the result of our ability to offer an integrated and efficient distribution solution for our customers. In fiscal 2010 we gained new business from a number of conventional supermarket customers, including Giant-Landover, Shop-Rite and Kings, partially as a result of our complementary product selection. In part as a result of our product breadth, in fiscal 2011 we were awarded new business from several other conventional supermarket customers, including Giant Eagle and Safeway. We began shipping to Safeway nationally in October 2011.

        We believe that we are the primary distributor of natural and organic products to the majority of our natural products customer base, including to Whole Foods Market, our largest customer. We intend to maintain our position as the primary supplier for a majority of our customers, and to add to the number of customers for which we serve as primary supplier by offering the broadest product selection in our industry at competitive prices. With the acquisition of DHI, and the expansion of UNFI Specialty,specialty product offerings, we further believe that we have the ability to further meet our existing customers' needs for specialty foods and non-food products, as well as certain general merchandise. We believe this representsrepresenting an opportunity to accelerate our sales growth within the conventional supermarket, channel and potentially our supernatural and independent channels.

        We have launchedinvested approximately $211 million in our distribution network and infrastructure over the past five fiscal years. We achieved a number of private label or branded product linesnationwide footprint in order to provide our customersSeptember 2010 with a broader selection of product offerings. In fiscal 2009, our branded product net sales were approximately 3.1%the opening of our overall net sales.facility in Lancaster, Texas. Our Lancaster facility was the first facility to use our national supply chain platform and warehouse management system and our Ridgefield, Washington facility began using this system in July 2012. We plan to increaseimplement this system throughout our branded products business through organic growth. Wenetwork by the end of fiscal 2015 which we believe this initiative differentiates us from other distributors withinwill further enhance the efficiency of our industry, enables usnetwork. Although our distribution network services all markets in the United States and Canada, we intend to continue to selectively evaluate opportunities to build long-term brand equityor lease new facilities or to acquire distributors to better serve existing markets, such as our new lease for a 535,000 square foot facility in Aurora, Colorado which is expected to become operational in the Companysummer of 2013 and allows uswill consolidate three existing distribution centers.

        Further, we will strive to generate higher gross margins, as branded product revenues generally yield higher margins than do third party branded product revenues.continue to maintain our focus on realizing efficiencies and economies of scale in purchasing, warehousing, transportation and general and administrative functions, which, combined with incremental fixed cost leverage, should lead to continued improvements in our operating margin.

        We believe that we will be successful in expanding into the food servicefoodservice channel as well as further enhancing our presence inoutside of the international channel.United States and Canada. We will continue to seek to develop regional relationships and alliances with companies such as Aramark Corporation, the Compass Group North America, and Sodexho Inc. in the food servicefoodservice channel and seek other alliances inoutside the international channel.United States and Canada.

        As discussed under "—Our Competitive Advantages" above,Throughout our history, we have made significant capital expendituressuccessfully identified, consummated and incurred considerable expenses in connection withintegrated multiple acquisitions. Since 2000, we have successfully completed ten acquisitions of distributors, manufacturers


Table of Contents

and suppliers, two acquisitions of natural products retail stores and eleven acquisitions of branded product lines as of July 28, 2012. Subsequent to the constructionend of new, or the expansion2012 fiscal year, we completed three additional acquisitions of small distributors, which will be folded into our existing distribution facilities.operations. We willintend to continue to selectively evaluate opportunitiespursue opportunistic acquisitions to build or lease new facilities or to acquire distributors to better serve existing markets and expand into new markets. Further, we will maintainthe breadth of our focus on integrating these new or acquired facilities into our nationwide distribution network, in order to improveincrease our economies of scale in purchasing, warehousing, transportationefficiency or add additional products and general and administrative functions, which we believe will lead to continued improvements in our operating margin.capabilities.

        We believe that we provide the leading distribution solution to the natural, organic and specialty products industry through our national presence, regional responsiveness,preferences, focus on customer service and breadth of product offerings. Our service levels, which we believe to be the highest in our industry, are attributable to our experienced purchasing departments and our sophisticated warehousing, inventory control and distribution systems. See "—Our Focus on Technology" below for more information regarding our use of technology in our warehousing, inventory control and distribution systems.

        Among the benefits we provide to our customers is access, at preferred rates and terms, to the suite of products developed by Living Naturally, LLC, a leading provider of marketing promotion and


Table of Contents


electronic ordering systems to the natural and organic products industry. We have maintained a strategic alliance with Living Naturally since 2002. The products provided by Living Naturally include an intelligent electronic ordering system and turnkey retailer website services, which create new opportunities for our retailers to increase their inventory turns, reduce their costs and enhance their profits.        We also offer our customers a selection of inventory management, merchandising, marketing, promotional and event management services designed to increase sales and enhance customer satisfaction. These marketing services, which primarily are utilized by customers in our independently owned natural products retailers channel and many of which are co-sponsored with suppliers, include monthly and thematic circular programs, in-store signage and assistance in product display.

Our Customers

        We maintain long-standing customer relationships with independently-owned natural products retailers, supernatural chains and supermarket chains. In addition, we emphasize our relationships with new customers, such as national conventional supermarkets, mass market outlets and gourmet stores, which are continually increasing their natural product offerings. The following were included among our wholesale customers for fiscal 2009:2012:

        Whole Foods Market accounted for approximately 33.1%is our only customer that represented more than 10% of ourtotal net sales in fiscal 2009.2012, and accounted for approximately 36% of our net sales. In October 2006, we announced a seven-year distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market, which commenced on September 26, 2006, under which2006. In June 2010 we amended our distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market to extend the term of the agreement for an additional seven years. Under the terms of the amended agreement, we will continue to serve as the primary U.S.wholesale natural grocery distributor to Whole Foods Market in theits United States regions where we currently serve as the primary distributor. The amendment extended the expiration date of the agreement from September 25, 2013 to September 25, 2020.

        On July 28, 2010, we announced that we had entered into an asset purchase agreement under which we agreed to acquire certain assets of Whole Foods Distribution previously served. In January 2007, we expanded ourused for their self-distribution of non-perishables in their Rocky Mountain and Southwest regions, and to become the primary distributor in these regions. We closed this transaction in late September 2010 in the case of the Southwest region and early October 2010 in the case of the Rocky Mountain region. We now serve as the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market relationshipin all of its regions in the Southern Pacific region of the United States. Our relationshipStates, and have amended our distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market was further expanded in August 2007, when Whole Foods Market completed its merger with Wild Oats Markets. We had served as the primary distributoreffective October 11, 2010 to include these regions.


Table of natural and organic foods and non-food products to Wild Oats Markets prior to the merger, and we continue to serve the former Wild Oats Markets stores retained by Whole Foods Market under our distribution arrangement with Whole Foods Market. We also continue to serve as a primary distributor to the Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations previously owned by Wild Oats Markets and sold by Whole Foods Market to a subsidiary of Smart & Final Inc. on September 30, 2007. Sales to Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations were reflected in our supermarket channel beginning in fiscal 2008.Contents

        The following table lists the percentage of sales by customer type for the fiscal years ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and August 2, 2008:July 31, 2010:

 
 Percentage
of Net Sales
 
Customer Type
 2009 2008 

Independently owned natural products retailers

  42% 42%

Supernatural chains

  33% 31%

Conventional supermarkets

  20% 23%

Other

  5% 4%

 
 Percentage of Net Sales 
Customer Type
 2012 2011 2010 

Independently owned natural products retailers

  35% 37% 40%

Supernatural chains

  36% 36% 35%

Conventional supermarkets and mass market chains

  24% 22% 21%

Other

  5% 5% 4%

        We distribute natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products to customers located in the United States and Canada, as well as to customers internationally.located in other foreign countries. Our total international sales, to international customers represent less than oneincluding those by UNFI Canada, represented approximately five percent of our business.


Tablebusiness in both fiscal 2012 and 2011. We believe that our sales outside the United States, as a percentage of Contentsour total sales, will expand as we seek to grow our Canadian operations.

Our Marketing Services

        We have developedoffer a variety of supplier-sponsored marketing services designed to increase sales for our customers and suppliers, including consumer and trade marketing programs, as well as programs to support suppliers in understanding our markets. Trade and consumer marketing programs are supplier-sponsored programs which cater to a broad range of retail formats. These programs are designed to educate consumers, profile suppliers and increase sales for retailers, many of which do not have the resources necessary to conduct such marketing programs independently.

        Our consumer marketing programs include:

        Our trade marketing programs include:


Table of Contents

        Our supplier marketing programs include:

        We keep current with the latest trends in the industry. Periodically, we conduct focus group sessions with certain key retailers and suppliers in order to ascertain their needs and allow us to better service them. We also:

Our Products

        Our extensive selection of high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products enables us to provide a primary source of supply to a diverse base of customers whose product needs vary significantly. We carryoffer more than 60,00065,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products, consisting of national brand, regional brand, private label and master distribution products, in six product categories: grocery and general merchandise, produce, perishables and frozen foods, nutritional supplements and sports nutrition, bulk and food service products and personal care items. Our branded product lines address certain needs or preferences of our customers, which in certain cases are not otherwise being met by other suppliers.


Table of Contents

        We continuously evaluate potential new private branded and other products based on both existing and anticipated trends in consumer preferences and buying patterns. Our buyers regularly attend regional and national natural, organic, specialty, ethnic and gourmet product shows to review the latest products that are likely to be of interest to retailers and consumers. We also actively solicit suggestions for new products from our customers. We make the majority of our new product decisions at the regional level. We believe that our decentralized purchasing practices allow our regional buyers to react quickly to changing consumer preferences and to evaluate new products and new product categories regionally. Additionally, many of the new products that we offer are marketed on a regional basis or in our own natural products retail stores prior to being offered nationally, which enables us to evaluate local


Table of Contents

consumer reaction to the products without incurring significant inventory risk. Furthermore, by exchanging regional product sales information between our regions, we are able to make more informed and timely new product decisions in each region.

        We maintain a comprehensive quality assurance program. All of the products we sell that are represented as "organic" are required to be certified as such by an independent third-party agency. We maintain current certification affidavits on all organic commodities and produce in order to verify the authenticity of the product. All potential suppliers of organic products are required to provide such third-party certifications to us before they are approved as suppliers.

Our Suppliers

        We purchase our products from approximately 4,300more than 4,800 suppliers. The majority of our suppliers are based in the United States and Canada, but we also source products from suppliers throughout Europe, Asia, Central America, South America, Africa and Australia. We believe the reason suppliers of natural and organic products seek to distribute their products through us is because we provide access to a large and growing national customer base across the United States and Canada, distribute the majority of the suppliers' products and offer a wide variety of marketing programs to our customers to help sell the suppliers' products. Substantially all product categories that we distribute are available from a number of suppliers and, therefore, we are not dependent on any single source of supply for any product category. Our largest supplier, Hain Celestial Group, Inc. ("Hain"), accounted for approximately 7.8%6% of our total purchases in fiscal 2009.2012. However, the product categories we purchase from Hain can be purchased from a number of other suppliers. In addition, although we have exclusive distribution arrangements and vendor support programs with several suppliers, none of theseour suppliers accountsaccount for more than 10% of our total purchases.

        We have positioned ourselves as the largest purchaser of organically grown bulk products in the natural and organic products industry by centralizing our purchase of nuts, seeds, grains, flours and dried foods. As a result, we are able to negotiate purchases from suppliers on the basis of volume and other considerations that may include discounted pricing or prompt payment discounts. Furthermore, many of our purchase arrangements include the right of return to the supplier with respect to products that we aredo not able to sell in a certain period of time. As described under "—Our"Our Products" above, each region is responsible for placing its own orders and can select the products that it believes will most appeal to its customers, although each region is able to participate in our company-wide purchasing programs. Our outstanding commitments for the purchase of inventory were approximately $27.7$24.0 million as of August 1, 2009.July 28, 2012.

Our Distribution System

        We have carefully chosen the sites for our distribution centers to provide direct access to our regional markets. This proximity allows us to reduce our transportation costs relative to those of our competitors that seek to service these customers from locations that are often several hundreds of miles away. The opening of our Lancaster, Texas distribution center significantly reduced the miles driven associated with servicing the customers of that facility as many of those customers were previously serviced from our Aurora, Colorado facility. We believe that we incur lower inbound freight expense than our regional competitors, because our national presencescale allows us to buy full and partial truckloads of products. Whenever possible,When financially advantageous, we backhaul between our distribution centers and satellite, staging facilities using our own trucks.


Table of Contents


Additionally, we generally can redistribute overstocks and inventory imbalances between distribution centers if needed, which helps us ensure products are sold prior to their expiration date and more appropriately balance inventories.date.

        Products are delivered to our distribution centers primarily by our fleet of leased trucks, contract carriers and the suppliers themselves. We lease our trucks from national leasing companies such as


Table of Contents

Ryder Truck Leasing and Penske Truck Leasing, which in some cases maintain facilities on our premises for the maintenance and service of these vehicles. Other trucks are leased from regional firms that offer competitive services.

        We ship certain orders for supplements or for items that are destined for areas outside of regular delivery routes through United Parcel Service and other independent carriers. Deliveries to areas outside the continental United States and Canada are typically shipped by ocean-going containers on a weekly basis.

Our Focus on Technology

        We have made a significant investment in distribution, financial, information and warehouse management systems. We continually evaluate and upgrade our management information systems at our regional operations based on the best practices in the distribution industry in order to make the systems more efficient, cost-effective and responsive to customer needs. These systems include functionality in radio frequency inventory control, pick-to-voice systems, pick-to-light systems, computer-assisted order processing and slot locator/retrieval assignment systems. At our receiving docks, warehouse associates attach computer-generated, preprinted locator tags to inbound products. These tags contain the expiration date, locations, quantity, lot number and other information about the products in bar code format. Customer returns are processed by scanning the UPC bar codes. We also employ a management information system that enables us to lower our inbound transportation costs by making optimum use of our own fleet of trucks or by consolidating deliveries into full truckloads. Orders from multiple suppliers and multiple distribution centers are consolidated into single truckloads for efficient use of available vehicle capacity and return-haul trips. In addition, we utilize route efficiency software that assists us in developing the most efficient routes for our trucks. We will continue the roll-out of our new national supply chain platform and warehouse management system, which was first launched in our new Lancaster, Texas facility and is now being implemented distribution center by distribution center. Most recently, we launched our national supply chain platform and warehouse management system in our Ridgefield, Washington facility in July 2012. We expect to complete this roll-out by the end of fiscal 2015.

Intellectual Property

        We do not own or have the right to use any patent, trademark, trade name, license, franchise, or concession which upon loss would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Competition

        Our largest competition comes from direct distribution, whereby a customer reaches a product volume level that justifies distribution directly from the manufacturer. Our major nationalwholesale distribution competitor in both the United States and Canada is KeHE Distributors, LLC ("Kehe"), which acquired Tree of Life Distribution, Inc. (a subsidiary of Koninklijke Wessanen N.V.) ("Tree of Life"). in January 2010. In addition to its natural and organic products, Tree of LifeKehe distributes specialty food products thereby diversifying its product selection, and markets its own private label program. Kehe's subsidiary, Tree of Life has also earned QAI certification and has a European presence.certification. We also compete in the United States with over 200 smaller regional and local distributors of natural, ethnic, kosher, gourmet and other specialty foods that focus on niche or regional markets, and with national, regional and local distributors of conventional groceries and companies that distribute to their own retail facilities.

        We believe that distributors in the natural and specialty products industries primarily compete on distribution service levels, product quality, depth of inventory selection, price and quality of customer service. We believe that we currently compete effectively with respect to each of these factors.


Table of Contents

        Our natural products retail stores compete against other natural products outlets, conventional supermarkets and specialty stores. We believe that retailers of natural products compete principally on product quality and selection, price, customer service, knowledge of personnel and convenience of location. We believe that we currently compete effectively with respect to each of these factors.

Government Regulation

        Our operations and many of the products that we distribute in the United States are subject to regulation by state and local health departments, the U.S. Department of AgricultureUSDA and the United States Food and Drug Administration, which generally impose


Table of Contents


standards for product quality and sanitation and are responsible for the administration of bioterrorism legislation. OurIn the United States, our facilities generally are inspected at least once annually by state or federal authorities.

        The Surface Transportation Board and the Federal Highway Administration regulate our trucking operations. In addition, interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety requirements prescribed by the U.S.United States Department of Transportation and other relevant federal and state agencies. Such matters as weight and dimension of equipment are also subject to federal and state regulations.

        WeOur operations do not generally are not subject us to many of the federal, provincial, state and local environmental laws and regulations that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment.regulations. However, certain of our distribution facilitiescenters have above-ground storage tanks for hydrogen fuel, diesel fuel and other petroleum products, which are subject to laws regulating such storage tanks.

        We believe that we are in material compliance with all federal, provincial, state and local laws applicable to our operations.

Employees

        As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, we had approximately 6,0007,000 full and part-time employees. An aggregateemployees, 434 of approximately 6.3% of our total employees, or approximately 374 of the employees at our Auburn, Washington, Edison, New Jersey, Iowa City, Iowa and Leicester, Massachusetts facilities,whom (approximately 6.2%) are covered by collective bargaining agreements.agreements at our Edison, New Jersey, Leicester, Massachusetts, Iowa City, Iowa and Dayville, Connecticut facilities. The Edison, New Jersey, Auburn, Washington, Leicester, Massachusetts, and Iowa City, Iowa and Dayville, Connecticut agreements expire in June 2011, February 2012,2014, March 20132014, June 2014 and June 2011,July 2014, respectively. We are currently in mediation with our Auburn, Washington employees in an effort to enter into a new collective bargaining agreement. The employees in this location have authorized a work stoppage in the event we are unable to come to an agreement; however, we are unable to predict whether or not a work stoppage will occur. We have never experienced a work stoppage by our unionized employees, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.good, despite the current lack of an agreement with employees in our Auburn, Washington facility.

Seasonality

        Generally, we do not experience any material seasonality. However, our sales and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to factors such as changes in our operating expenses, management's ability to execute our operating and growth strategies, personnel changes, demand for natural products, supply shortages and general economic conditions.

Available Information

        Our internet address is http://www.unfi.com. The contents of our website are not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our internet address is included in this document as an inactive textual reference only. We make our Annual ReportsReport on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to


Table of Contents

Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics for certain employees pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. A copy of our code of conduct and ethics is posted on our website, and is available free of charge by writing to United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island, 02908, Attn: Investor Relations.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

        Our executive officers are elected on an annual basis and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our executive officers and their ages as of September 26, 2012 are listed below:

Name
AgePosition
Steven L. Spinner52President and Chief Executive Officer
Mark E. Shamber43Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Joseph J. Traficanti61Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
Sean Griffin53Senior Vice President, Group President, Supply Chain, Distribution and National Sales
Eric A. Dorne51Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Thomas A. Dziki51Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resource and Sustainability Officer
Craig H. Smith53President of the Eastern Region
Donald P. McIntyre57President of the Western Region
David A. Matthews47Senior Vice President, National Sales and President of UNFI International
Thomas Grillea56President of Select Nutrition Distributors and Earth Origins Market
Christopher P. Testa42President of Blue Marble Brands and Woodstock Farms Manufacturing

Steven L. Spinner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2008. Mr. Spinner served as the Interim President of our Eastern Region, after David Matthews became President of UNFI International in September 2010 and prior to the hiring of Craig H. Smith in December 2010. Prior to joining us in September 2008, Mr. Spinner served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer of Performance Food Group Company ("PFG") from October 2006 to May 2008, when PFG was acquired by affiliates of The Blackstone Group and Wellspring Capital Management. Mr. Spinner previously had served as PFG's President and Chief Operating Officer beginning in May 2005. Mr. Spinner served as PFG's Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—Broadline Division from February 2002 to May 2005 and as PFG's Broadline Division President from August 2001 to February 2002.

Mark E. Shamber has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since October 2006. Mr. Shamber previously served as our Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from January 2006 until October 2006, as Vice President and Corporate Controller from August 2005 to October 2006 and as our Corporate Controller from June 2003 until August 2005. From February 1995 until June 2003, Mr. Shamber served in various positions of increasing responsibility up to and including senior manager within the assurance and advisory business systems practice at the international accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP.


Table of Contents

Joseph J. Traficanti has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary since April 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Traficanti served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of PFG from November 2004 until April 2009.

Sean Griffin has served as our Senior Vice President, Group President for Supply Chain, Distribution and National Sales since June 2012, and as our Senior Vice President, National Distribution from January 2010 to June 2012. Prior to joining us, Mr. Griffin was East Region Broadline President of PFG. In this role he managed over ten divisions and $2 billion in sales. Previously he served as President of PFG—Springfield, MA from 2003 until 2008. He began his career with Sysco Corporation in 1986 and has held various leadership positions in the foodservice distribution industry with U.S. Foodservice, Alliant Foodservice and Sysco Corporation.

Eric Dorne has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since September 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dorne was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., the parent company of the A&P, Pathmark, SuperFresh, Food Emporium and Waldbaum's supermarket chains located in the Eastern United States from January 2011 to August 2011, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from August 2005 to January 2011. In his more than thirty years at The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Mr. Dorne held various executive positions including Vice President of Enterprise IT Application Management and Development, Vice President of Store Operations Systems and Director of Retail Support Services.

Thomas A. Dziki has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resource and Sustainability Officer since August 2010. Prior to August 2010, Mr. Dziki served as our Senior Vice President of Sustainable Development since January 2010, as our Vice President of Sustainable Development since June 2009, and as National Vice President of Real Estate and Construction since August 2006. Prior to that time, Mr. Dziki had served as President of Woodstock Farms Manufacturing and Select Nutrition from December 2004 until August 2006, Corporate Vice President of Special Projects from December 2003 to November 2004 and as our Manager of Special Projects from May 2002 to December 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dziki served as a private consultant to our company, our subsidiaries, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, Earth Origins, Albert's, and our predecessor company, Cornucopia Natural Foods, Inc., from 1995 to May 2002.

Craig H. Smith has served as our President of the Eastern Region since December 2010. Prior to joining us, Mr. Smith was Atlantic Region President of U.S. Foodservice, a leading broadline foodservice distributor of national, private label, and signature brand items in the United States from May 2008 to December 2010. In his seventeen years at U.S. Foodservice, Mr. Smith held various executive positions including SVP Street Sales, North Region Zone President, Detroit Market President and Boston Market President. Prior to U.S. Foodservice, Mr. Smith held several positions at food service industry manufacturer and distributor Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. from 1982 until 1993.

Donald P. McIntyre has served as our President of the Western Region since July 2012. Prior to joining us, Mr. McIntyre served as President and CEO of Claridge Foods from March 2006 to January 2012. Mr. McIntyre also held several senior positions within subsidiaries of Sara Lee Corporation, including President and CEO of Sara Lee Coffee & Tea from April 2004 to March 2006, and CFO of Sara Lee Coffee & Tea from August 2002 to March 2004.

David A. Matthews has served as our Senior Vice President, National Sales since July 2012, and President of UNFI International with responsibility for our Canadian and other international operations since September 2010. From June 2009 to September 2010 he was our President of the Eastern Region. Prior to joining us, Mr. Matthews served as President and CEO of Progressive Group Alliance ("ProGroup"), a wholly owned subsidiary of PFG from January 2007 to May 2009, as Chief Financial Officer of ProGroup from December 2004 to January 2007, and as Senior Vice President of Finance and Technology of ProGroup from July 2000 to December 2004.


Table of Contents

Thomas Grillea has served as our President of Earth Origins Market since May 2008 and President of Select Nutrition Distributors since September 2007. Mr. Grillea also served as our President of Woodstock Farms Manufacturing from May 2009 to September 2012. Mr. Grillea served as our General Manager for Select Nutrition Distributors from September 2006 to September 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. Grillea served in a management capacity for Whole Foods Market from 2004 through 2005, and in various management capacities for American Health and Diet Centers and the Vitamin Shoppe from 1998 through 2003.

Christopher P. Testa has served as our President of Woodstock Farms Manufacturing since September 2012 and President of Blue Marble Brands since August 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Testa served as Vice President of Marketing for Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages from August 2002 to May 2005 and as CEO of Wild Waters, Inc. from May 2005 to August 2009.


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

        Our business, financial condition and results of operations are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This section discusses factors that, individually or in the aggregate, we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks.

        We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties applicable to our business. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Forward-Looking Statements."

        Whole Foods Market accounted for approximately 36% of our net sales in fiscal 2012. We serve as the primary distributor of natural, organic and specialty non-perishable products to Whole Foods Market in all of its regions in the United States under the terms of our amended distribution agreement which expires on September 25, 2020. Our ability to maintain a close mutually beneficial relationship with our largest customer, Whole Foods Market is an important element to our continued growth. In October 2006, we announced a seven-year distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market, which commenced on September 26, 2006, under which we serve as the primary U.S. distributor to Whole Foods Market in the regions where we previously served. In January 2007, we expanded our Whole Foods Market relationship in the Southern Pacific region of the United States. In August 2007, Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets completed their merger, as a result of which, Wild Oats Markets became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Whole Foods Market. We service all of the stores previously owned by Wild Oats Markets and now owned by Whole Foods Market under the terms of our distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market. Excluding sales to Wild Oats Markets' former Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations (which were sold by Whole Foods Market to a subsidiary of Smart & Final Inc. on September 30, 2007), Whole Foods Market accounted for approximately 33.1% of our net sales in fiscal 2009. As a result of this concentration of our customer base, the

        The loss or cancellation of business from Whole Foods Market, including from increased distribution to their own facilities or closures of stores, previously owned by Wild Oats Markets, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, if Whole Foods Market is not able to grow its business, including as a result of a reduction in the level of discretionary spending by its customers, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

        The grocery industry is sensitive to national and regional economic conditions and the demand for the products that we distribute, particularly our specialty products, may be adversely affected from time to time by economic downturns that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending. Future economic conditions such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, inflation rates, energy and fuel costs and tax rates could reduce consumer spending or change consumer purchasing habits. Among these changes could be a reduction in the number of natural and organic products that consumers purchase where there are non-organic, (or "conventional")which we refer to as conventional, alternatives, given that many natural and organic products, and particularly natural and organic foods, often have higher retail prices than do their conventional counterparts.

        The grocery distribution industry generally is characterized by relatively high volume of sales with relatively low profit margins. The continuing consolidation of retailers in the natural products industry and the growth of supernatural chains may reduce our profit margins in the future as more customers qualify for greater volume discounts, and we experience pricing pressures from suppliers and retailers. Over the last two fiscal years, we have increased our sales to our supernatural chain and conventional supermarket customers in relation to our total sales. In addition,the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced that we had entered into a three-year distribution arrangement to supply Safeway with nonproprietary natural, organic and specialty products, which will further increase the percentage of our operating results are particularly sensitivetotal sales to conventional supermarkets. Sales to these customers within our supernatural chain and may be materially adversely affected by:conventional


Table of Contents

        We cannot assure yousupermarket channels generate a lower gross margin than do sales to our independent customers. Many of these customers, including our largest customer, have agreements with us that one or more of such factors will not materially adversely affectinclude volume discounts. As the amounts these customers purchase from us increase, the price that they pay for the products they purchase is reduced, putting downward pressure on our gross margins on these sales. To compensate for these lower gross margins, we must reduce the expenses we incur to service these customers. If we are unable to reduce our expenses, including our expenses related to servicing this lower gross margin business, our business, financial condition or results of operations.operations could be adversely impacted.

        Many of our sales are at prices that are based on our product cost plus a percentage markup. As a result, volatile food costs have a direct impact upon our profitability. Prolonged periods of product cost inflation may have a negative impact on our profit margins and results of operations to the extent that we are unable to pass on all or a portion of such product cost increases to our customers. In addition, product cost inflation may negatively impact the consumer discretionary spending trends of our customers' customers, which could adversely affect our sales. Conversely, because many of our sales are at prices that are based upon product cost plus a percentage markup, our profit levels may be negatively impacted during periods of product cost deflation even though our gross profit as a percentage of net sales may remain relatively constant. To compensate for lower gross margins, we, in turn, must reduce expenses that we incur to service our customers.

        We generally sell productsMany of our customers buy from us under purchase orders, and we generally do not have agreements with or commitments from ourthese customers for the purchase of products. We cannot assure you that our customers will maintain or increase their sales volumes or orders for the products supplied by us or that we will be able to maintain or add to our existing customer base. Decreases in our customers' sales volumes or orders for products supplied by us may have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        We operate in competitive markets and our future success will be largely dependent on our ability to provide quality products and services at competitive prices. Bidding for contracts or arrangements with customers, particularly within the supernatural chain and conventional supermarket channels, is highly competitive and distributors may market their services to a particular customer over a long period of time before they are invited to bid. Our competition comes from a variety of sources, including other distributors of natural products as well as specialty grocery and mass market grocery distributors and retail customers that have their own distribution channels. We cannot assure you that mass market grocery distributors will not increase their emphasis on natural products and more directly compete with us including through self-distribution of particular items or purchases of particular items directly from suppliers or that new competitors will not enter the market. These distributors may have been in business longer than we have, may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have and may be better established in their markets. We cannot assure you that our current or potential competitors will not provide products or services comparable or superior to those provided by us or adapt more quickly than we do to evolving industry trends or changing market requirements. It is also possible that alliances among competitors may develop and rapidly acquire significant market share or that certain of our customers will increase distribution to their own retail facilities. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Table of Contents

We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors.

        Much of our sales growth is occurring in our lower gross margin supernatural and conventional supermarket channels. In our attempt to reduce operating expenses and increase operating efficiencies, we have aggressively invested in the development and implementation of new information technology. Following the start-up inefficiencies associated with the initial implementation of our technological initiatives in our Lancaster, Texas distribution center during fiscal 2011, we revised the timeline for the broader implementation of our proposed technological developments and now expect to complete the roll-out by the end of fiscal 2015. While we currently believe this revised timeline will be met, we may not be able to implement these technological changes in the time frame that we have planned and delays in implementation could negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the costs to make these changes may exceed our estimates and will exceed the benefits during the early stages of implementation. Even if we are able to implement the changes in accordance with our revised plans, and within our current cost estimates, we may not be able to achieve the expected efficiencies and cost savings from this investment, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        Our ability to decrease costs and increase profits, as well as our ability to serve customers most effectively, depends on the reliability of our technology platform. We use software and other technology systems, among other things, to generate and select orders, to load and route trucks and to monitor and manage our business on a day-to-day basis. Any disruption to these computer systems could adversely impact our customer service, decrease the volume of our business and result in increased costs negatively affecting our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        Certain of our customers have from time to time experienced bankruptcy, insolvency and/or an inability to pay their debts to us as they come due. If our customers suffer significant financial difficulty, they may be unable to pay their debts to us timely or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. It is possible that customers may reject their contractual obligations to us under bankruptcy laws or otherwise. Significant customer bankruptcies could further adversely affect our revenues and increase our operating expenses by requiring larger provisions for bad debt. In addition, even when our contracts with these customers are not rejected, if customers are unable to meet their obligations on a timely basis, it could adversely affect our ability to collect receivables. Further, we may have to negotiate significant discounts and/or extended financing terms with these customers in such a situation, each of which could have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations andor cash flows.

        The grocery distribution industry generally is characterized by relatively high volume of sales with relatively low profit margins. The continuing consolidation of retailers in theindependently owned natural products industryretailer customers, may be impacted more severely and more quickly than larger businesses. Consequently, the growthability of supernatural chainssuch businesses to repay their obligations to us may reducedeteriorate, and in some cases this deterioration may occur quickly, which could adversely impact our profit margins in the future as more customers qualify for greater volume discounts, and we experience pricing pressures from both endsbusiness, financial condition or results of the supply chain.operations.


Table of Contents

        We continually evaluate opportunities to acquire other companies. To the extent that our future growth includes acquisitions, we cannot assure you that we will successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, consummate such potential acquisitions, integrate any acquired entities or successfully expand into new markets as a result of our acquisitions. We believe that there are risks related to acquiring companies, including overpaying for acquisitions, losing key employees of acquired companies and failing to achieve potential synergies. Additionally, our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to integrate the companies acquired in our acquisitions and mergers.

        A significant portion of our past growth has been achieved through acquisitions of, or mergers with, other distributors of natural, organic and specialty products. FutureWe also continually evaluate opportunities to acquire other companies. We believe that there are risks related to acquiring companies, including an inability to successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates or consummate such potential acquisitions. To the extent that our future growth includes acquisitions, we cannot assure you that we will not overpay for acquisitions, lose key employees of acquired companies, or fail to achieve potential synergies or expansion into new markets as a result of our acquisitions. Therefore, future acquisitions, if any, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly in periods immediately following the consummation of those transactions while the operations of the acquired business are being integrated with our operations. Achieving the benefits of acquisitions depends on timely, efficient and successful execution


Table of Contents


of a number of post-acquisition events, including, successful integration of the acquired entity. Integration requires, among other things:

        The integration process could divert the attention of management and any difficulties or problems encountered in the transition process could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the integration process may temporarily redirect resources previously focused on reducing product cost, resulting in lower gross profits in relation to sales. In addition, the process of combining companies could cause the interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of the respective businesses, which could have an adverse effect on their combined operations.

        In connection with the acquisitions of businesses in the future, if any, we may decide to consolidate the operations of any acquired business with our existing operations or make other changes with respect to the acquired business, which could result in special charges or other expenses. Our results of operations also may be adversely affected by expenses we incur in making acquisitions, by amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets with definite lives and by additional depreciation attributable to acquired assets. Any of the businesses we acquire may also have liabilities or adverse operating issues, including some that we fail to discover before the acquisition, and our indemnity for such liabilities may also be limited. Additionally, our ability to make any future acquisitions may depend upon obtaining additional financing. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms or at all. To the extent that we seek to acquire other businesses in exchange for our common stock, fluctuations in our stock price could have a material adverse effect on our ability to complete acquisitions.

        The growth in the size of our business and operations has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on our management. Our future growth may be limited by our inability to acquire new distribution facilitiescenters or expand our existing distribution facilities,centers, make acquisitions, successfully integrate acquired entities or significant new customers, implement information systems initiatives or adequately manage our personnel. Our future growth is limited in part by the size and location of our distribution centers. As we near maximum utilization of a given facility or maximize our processing capacity, operations may be constrained and inefficiencies have been and may be created, which could adversely affect our results of operations unless the facility is expanded, volume is shifted to another facility or additional processing capacity is added. Conversely, as we add additional facilities or expand existing operations or facilities, excess capacity may be created. Any excess capacity may also


Table of Contents

create inefficiencies and adversely affect our results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully expand our existing distribution facilitiescenters or open new distribution facilitiescenters in new or existing markets as needed to accommodate or facilitate growth. Even if we are able to expand our distribution network, our ability to compete effectively and to manage future growth, if any, will depend on our ability to continue to implement and improve operational, financial and management information systems on a timely basis and to expand, train, motivate and manage our work force. We cannot assure you that our existing personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support the future growth of our operations. Our inability to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Table of Contents

        We operate in competitive markets and our future success will be largely dependent on our ability to provide quality products and services at competitive prices. Our competition comes from a variety of sources, including other distributors of natural products as well as specialty grocery and mass market grocery distributors. We cannot assure you that mass market grocery distributors will not increase their emphasis on natural products and more directly compete with us or that new competitors will not enter the market. These distributors may have been in business longer than we have, may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have and may be better established in their markets. We cannot assure you that our current or potential competitors will not provide products or services comparable or superior to those provided by us or adapt more quickly than we do to evolving industry trends or changing market requirements. It is also possible that alliances among competitors may develop and rapidly acquire significant market share or that certain of our customers will increase distribution to their own retail facilities. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors.

        Increased fuel costs may have a negative impact on our results of operations. The high cost of diesel fuel can increase the price we pay for products as well as the costs we incur to deliver products to our customers. These factors, in turn, may negatively impact our net sales, margins, operating expenses and operating results. To manage this risk, we have in the past periodically entered, and may in the future periodically enter, into heating oil derivative contracts to hedge a portion of our projected diesel fuel requirements. Heating crude oil prices have a highly correlated relationship to fuel prices, making these derivatives effective in offsetting changes in the cost of diesel fuel. We are not party to any commodity swap agreements and, as a result, our exposure to volatility in the price of diesel fuel has increased relative to our exposure to volatility in prior periods in which we had outstanding heating oil derivative contracts. We do not enter into fuel hedge contracts for speculative purposes. We have in the past, and may however,in the future, periodically enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected monthly diesel fuel requirements.requirements at fixed prices. As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, we had forward diesel fuel commitments totaling approximately $6.0$16 million through July 2010.2013. Our commitments through August 2009July 2013 were entered into at prevailing rates from mid-June through mid-July 2009.during June 2012. If fuel prices decrease significantly, these forward purchases may prove ineffective and result in us paying higher than the then market costs for a portion of our diesel fuel. We also maintain a fuel surcharge program which allows us to pass some of our higher fuel costs through to our customers. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to pass a comparable proportion or any of our higher fuel costs to our customers in the future.future, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        Damage or disruption to our distribution capabilities due to weather, natural disaster, fire, terrorism, pandemic, strikes, the financial and/or operational instability of key suppliers, or other reasons could impair our ability to distribute our products. To the extent that we are unable, or it is not financially feasible, to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to manage effectively such events if they occur, there could be an adverse effect on our business financial condition or results of operations.

        WeIn May 2012, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility pursuant to which we now have a $400$500 million secured revolving credit facility which matures on November 27, 2012,May 24, 2017; of which up to $450.0 million is available to our U.S. subsidiaries and under whichup to $50.0 million is available to UNFI Canada. The borrowings of the US portion of the credit facility accrue interest, at our option, at either (i) thea base rate (the applicable prime lending rate(generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of America Business Capital as announced from time to time)prime rate, (y) the average overnight federal funds effective rate plus one-half percent (0.50%) per annum and (z) one-month LIBOR plus one percent (1%) per annum plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") for one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all


Table of Contents

affected lenders, nine months plus 0.75%an initial margin of 1.50%. The borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility for Canadian swing-line loans, Canadian over advance loans or Canadian protective advances accrue interest, at our option, at either (i) a prime rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) 0.50% over 30-day Reuters Canadian Deposit Offering Rate for bankers' acceptances, (y) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A.'s Canada branch, and (z) a bankers' acceptance equivalent rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00% plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) a bankers' acceptance equivalent rate of the rate of interest per annum equal to the annual rates applicable to Canadian Dollar bankers' acceptances on the "CDOR Page" of Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service, plus five basis points, and an initial margin of 1.50% (the "CDOR rate"). All other borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility must exclusively accrue interest under the CDOR rate plus the applicable margin.

        As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, our borrowing base, based on accounts receivable and inventory levels and described more completely below under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Revenues," was $355.7$483.7 million, with remaining availability of $137.0$341.8 million. We have aDuring fiscal 2012, we used borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit facility to pay off our term loan agreement in the principal amount of $75 million secured by certain real property. The term loan is repayable over seven years based on a fifteen-year amortization schedule. Interest on the term loan accrues at one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%. As of August 1, 2009, $56.9 million was outstandingand refinance existing indebtedness under the term loan agreement.predecessor revolving credit facility.

        In order to maintain our profit margins, we rely on strategic investment buying initiatives, such as discounted bulk purchases, which require spending significant amounts of working capital.capital up front to purchase products that we will sell over a multi-month time period. In the event


Table of Contents


that our cost of capital increases, such as during a period in which we are not in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio covenants under our revolving credit facility, and our term loan agreement, or our ability to borrow funds or raise equity capital is limited, we could suffer reduced profit margins and be unable to grow our business organically or through acquisitions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        Our debt agreements contain financial covenants and other restrictions that limit our operating flexibility, limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and competitive pressures. Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences, including:

        In addition, each of our revolving credit facility and term loan requires that we comply with various financial tests and imposes certain restrictions on us, including among other things, restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, make loans or investments or pay dividends. Failure to comply with these covenants could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Table of Contents

        Our operating results may vary significantly from period to period due to:

        Due to the foregoing factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not necessarily be meaningful and that such comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance.

        We offer more than 65,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products, which we purchase from more than 4,800 suppliers. The majority of our suppliers are based in the United States and Canada, but we also source products from suppliers throughout Europe, Asia, Central America, South America, Africa and Australia. For the most part, we do not have long-term contracts with our suppliers committing them to provide products to us. Although our purchasing volume can provide benefits when dealing with suppliers, suppliers may not provide the products needed by us in the quantities and at the prices requested. We are also subject to delays caused by interruption in production and increases in product costs based on conditions outside of our control. These conditions include work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other job actions by employees of suppliers, short-term weather conditions or more prolonged climate change, crop conditions, product recalls, water shortages, transportation interruptions, unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs, competitive demands and natural disasters or other catastrophic events (including, but not limited to food-borne illnesses). Further, increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions could also impair production capabilities, disrupt our supply chain or impact demand for our products. In the summer months of 2012, certain agricultural areas of the United States and Mexico have experienced severe drought. The impact of this drought is uncertain and could result in volatile input costs. Input costs could increase at any point in time for a large portion of the products that we sell for a prolonged period. Our inability to obtain adequate products as a result of any of the foregoing factors or otherwise could mean that we could not fulfill our obligations to customers, and customers may turn to other distributors.


Table of Contents

        Our business is highly regulated at the federal, state and local levels and our products and distribution operations require various licenses, permits and approvals. In particular:

        Our Canadian operations are similarly subject to extensive regulation, including the English and French dual labeling requirements applicable to products that we distribute in Canada. The loss or revocation of any existing licenses, permits or approvals or the failure to obtain any additional licenses, permits or approvals in new jurisdictions where we intend to do business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, as a distributor and manufacturer of natural, organic, and specialty foods, we are subject to increasing governmental scrutiny of and public awareness regarding food safety and the sale, packaging and marketing of natural and organic products. Compliance with these laws may impose a significant burden on our operations. If we were to manufacture or distribute foods that are or are perceived to be contaminated, any resulting product recalls such as the peanut-related recall in January 2009, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operationsoperations. Additionally, concern over climate change, including the impact of global warming, has led to significant United States and financial condition.international legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Increased regulation regarding greenhouse gas emissions, especially diesel engine emissions, could impose substantial costs on us. These costs include an increase in the cost of the fuel and other energy we purchase and capital costs associated with updating or replacing our vehicles prematurely. Until the timing, scope and extent of such regulation becomes known, we cannot predict its effect on our results of operations. It is reasonably possible, however, that it could impose material costs on us which we may be unable to pass on to our customers.

        Like any other distributor and processor of food, weWe face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims if the products we manufacture or sell cause injury or illness. We may be subject to liability, which could be substantial, because of actual or alleged contamination in products manufactured or sold by us, including products sold by companies before we acquired them. We have, and the companies we have acquired have had, liability insurance with respect to product liability claims. This insurance may not continue to be available at a reasonable cost or at all, and may not be adequate to cover product liability claims against us or against companies we have acquired. We generally seek contractual indemnification from manufacturers, but any such indemnification is limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party. If we or any of our acquired companies do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification available, product liability claims and costs associated with product recalls, including a loss of business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operatingfinancial condition or results and financial condition.of operations.

        Management of our business is substantially dependent upon the services of certain key management employees. Loss of the services of any officers or any other key management employee could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Table of Contents

        As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012 we had approximately 6,0007,000 full and part-time employees. An aggregateemployees, 434 of approximately 6.3% of our total employees, or approximately 374 of the employees at our Auburn, Washington, Edison, New Jersey, Iowa City, Iowa and Leicester, Massachusetts facilities,whom (approximately 6.2%) are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Theagreements at our Edison, New Jersey, Auburn, Washington, Leicester, Massachusetts, and Iowa City, Iowa and Dayville, Connecticut facilities. The Edison, New Jersey, Leicester, Massachusetts, Iowa City, Iowa and Dayville, Connecticut agreements expire in June 2011, February 2012,2014, March 20132014, June 2014 and June 2011,July 2014, respectively. We have in the past been the focus of union-organizing efforts.efforts, and it is likely that we will be the focus of similar efforts in the future.

        As we increase our employee base and broaden our distribution operations to new geographic markets, our increased visibility could result in increased or expanded union-organizing efforts. Although we have not experienced a work stoppage to date, if additional employees were to unionize or we are not successful


Table of Contents

in reaching agreement with theseour union employees when their agreements expire (like is the case currently in our Auburn, Washington location), we could be subject to work stoppages and increases in labor costs, either of which could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        Our collective bargaining agreement with our employees at our Auburn, Washington facility expired in August 2012, and to date we have been unsuccessful in negotiating a new agreement with these employees, despite employing the services of the Federal Mediation Service. If we are unable to reach an agreement with these employees, it is possible that the employees could strike as the union employees have authorized a work stoppage. In that event, it would be necessary for us to hire replacement workers to continue to meet our obligations to our customers. The costs to hire replacement workers would negatively impact the profitability of our Auburn, Washington facility, and depending on the length of time that we are required to employ replacement workers these costs could be significant.

        We are primarily self-insured for workers' compensation and automobile liability insurance. We believe that our workers' compensation and automobile insurance coverage is customary for businesses of our size and type. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe are not commercially reasonable to insure. These losses, should they occur, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the cost of workers' compensation insurance and automobile insurance fluctuates based upon our historical trends, market conditions and availability.

        Any projection of losses concerning workers' compensation and automobile insurance is subject to a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. If actual losses incurred are greater than those anticipated, our reserves may be insufficient and additional costs could be recorded in our consolidated financial statements. If we suffer a substantial loss that is not covered by our self-insurance reserves, the loss and attendant expenses could harm our business and operating results. We have purchased stop loss coverage from third parties, which limits our exposure above the amounts we have self-insured.


Table of Contents

        In recent periods,At times, there has been significant volatility in the market price of our common stock. In addition, the market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future in response to a number of factors, including the following:

        In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

        Not applicable.None.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

        We maintained twentytwenty-six distribution centers at fiscal year endJuly 28, 2012 which were utilized by our wholesale division. These facilities, including offsite storage space, consisted of an aggregate of approximately 6.36.2 million square feet of storage space, which we believe represents the largest capacity of any distributor within the United States in the natural, organic and specialty products industry.


Table of Contents

        Set forth below for each of our distribution facilitiescenters is its location and the date on which our lease will expireexpiration of leases as of July 28, 2012 for those distribution facilitiescenters that we do not own.

Location
 Lease Expiration

Atlanta, Georgia

 Owned

Auburn, California

 Owned

Auburn, Washington

 August 2019

Aurora, Colorado

October 2012
Aurora, Colorado January 2013

Aurora, Colorado

July 2015
Bridgeport, New Jersey

 Owned

Burnaby, British Columbia

October 2013
Charlotte, North CarolinaSeptember 2019
Chesterfield, New Hampshire

 Owned

Concord, Ontario

December 2014
Dayville, Connecticut

 Owned

Fontana, California

February 2012

Greenwood, Indiana

 Owned

Harrison, Arkansas

Iowa City, Iowa
 Owned

Iowa City, Iowa

Lancaster, Texas
 OwnedJuly 2020

Leicester, Massachusetts

 November 2011May 2013

Moreno Valley, California

 July 2023

Mounds View, Minnesota

 November 20112015

New Oxford, Pennsylvania

Owned
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

 January 2014

Richmond, British Columbia

August 2022
Ridgefield, Washington

 Owned

Rocklin, California

 Owned

Sarasota, Florida

 July 2017

Vernon, California

Scotstown, Quebec
 Owned

St. Laurent, Quebec

August 2012
Vernon, CaliforniaOwned
York, Pennsylvania

 May 2020

        We lease facilities to operate thirteen natural products retail stores through our Earth Origins division in Florida, Maryland and Massachusetts and one retail store through our UNFI Canada division, each with various lease expiration dates. We also lease a processing and manufacturing facility in Edison, New Jersey with a lease expiration date of March 31, 2010.2013.

        We lease office space in Santa Cruz, California, Danielson, Connecticut, Chesterfield, New Hampshire, Uniondale, New York, Richmond, Virginia, and Providence, Rhode Island, the site of our corporate headquarters. Our leases have been entered into upon terms that we believe to be reasonable and customary. We own office space in Dayville, Connecticut.

        We also lease a warehouse facility in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Our operations were moved to thisMinnesota that we acquired in connection with our acquisition of Roots & Fruits Produce Cooperative in 2005. This facility fromis currently being subleased under an agreement that expires concurrently with our Mounds View, Minnesota facility in October 2005. The lease for the Minneapolis facility will expiretermination in November 2016. We also lease offsite storage space near certain of our distribution facilities. We have also entered into a lease that expires July 2028 for a property in Aurora, Colorado.Colorado which will become our new distribution center. We expect this distribution center to become operational in the summer of 2013.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        From time to time, we are involved in routine litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. There are no pending material legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which our property is subject.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERSMINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

        There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.


Table of Contents


Executive Officers of the Registrant

        Our executive officers are elected on an annual basis and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our executive officers and their ages as of September 25, 2009 are listed below:

Name
AgePosition

Steven L. Spinner

49President and Chief Executive Officer

Mark E. Shamber

40Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Joseph J. Traficanti

58Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer

Michael Beaudry

45Senior Vice President, National Distribution

Daniel V. Atwood

51Senior Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer

John Stern

42Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Carl F. Koch III

41Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

David A. Matthews

44President of the Eastern Region

Kurt Luttecke

42President of the Western Region

Thomas A. Dziki

48Vice President of Sustainable Development

Steven L. Spinner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2008. Prior to joining the Company in September 2008, Mr. Spinner served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer of Performance Food Group Company ("PFG") from October 2006 to May 2008, when PFG was acquired by affiliates of The Blackstone Group and Wellspring Capital Management. Mr. Spinner previously had served as PFG's President and Chief Operating Officer beginning in May 2005. Mr. Spinner served as PFG's Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—Broadline Division from February 2002 to May 2005 and as PFG's Broadline Division President from August 2001 to February 2002.

Mark E. Shamber has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since October 2006. Mr. Shamber previously served as our Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from January 2006 until October 2006, as Vice President and Corporate Controller from August 2005 to October 2006 and as our Corporate Controller from June 2003 until August 2005. From February 1995 until June 2003, Mr. Shamber served in various positions of increasing responsibility up to and including senior manager within the assurance and advisory business systems practice at the international accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP.

Joseph J. Traficanti has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary since April 2009. Prior to joining UNFI, Mr. Traficanti served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of PFG from November 2004 until April 2009.

Michael Beaudry has served as Senior Vice President, National Distribution since June 2009. From January 2006 to June 2009, he was President of our Eastern Region. Mr. Beaudry served as our Vice President of Distribution from August 2003 until January 2006, Vice President of Operations, Eastern Region, from December 2002 until August 2003, as our Director of Operations from December 2001 until December 2002 and as the Warehouse/Operations Manager of our Dayville, Connecticut facility from December 1999 until December 2001. Prior to joining us, Mr. Beaudry held various management positions at Target Corporation.

Daniel V. Atwood has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer since August 2009. From December 2005 to August 2009, Mr. Atwood served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer and President of Blue Marble Brands. He was also our Secretary from January 1998 to August 2009. Mr. Atwood served as our Senior Vice President of Marketing from October 2002 until December 2005 and National Vice President of Marketing from April 2001 until October 2002.


Table of Contents


Mr. Atwood served on our Board of Directors from November 1996 until December 1997 and served on the Board of Directors of our predecessor company, Cornucopia Natural Foods, Inc., from August 1988 until October 1996. Mr. Atwood served as President of our subsidiary, NRG, from August 1995 until March 2001.

John Stern has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since January 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Stern served in various positions of increasing responsibility up to and including Chief Information Officer at Take Two Interactive Software, Inc. from October 2003 to September 2007 and Deloitte & Touche LLP from December 1999 to October 2003.

Carl F. Koch III has served as our Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer since June 2009. From December 2007 to June 2009, he was our Vice President of Human Resources. Mr. Koch previously served as Vice President of Risk and Compliance from August 2006 until December 2007, as Director of Risk Management from June 2004 until August 2006 and as the Corporate Risk Manager from June 2001 until May 2004. Prior to joining us, Mr. Koch held various management positions at Liberty Mutual Group.

David A. Matthews has served as our President of the Eastern Region since June 2009. Prior to joining UNFI, Mr. Matthews served as President and CEO of Progressive Group Alliance, Inc. ("ProGroup"), a wholly owned subsidiary of PFG from January 2007 to May 2009, as Chief Financial Officer of ProGroup from December 2004 to January 2007, and as Senior Vice President of Finance and Technology of ProGroup from July 2000 to December 2004.

Kurt Luttecke has served as our President of the Western Region since June 2009. Mr. Luttecke served as our President of UNFI's Albert's Organics division from June 2007 to June 2009. Prior to joining UNFI, Mr. Luttecke spent 16 years at Wild Oats serving as its Vice President of Perishables from 2006 to June 2007, Vice President of Meat/Seafood & Food Service Supply Chain from 2004 to 2006, Director of Perishables from 2001 to 2004, and Director of Operations from 1995 to 2001.

Thomas A. Dziki has served as Vice President of Sustainable Development since March 2007. Mr. Dziki served as our National Vice President of Real Estate and Construction from August 2006 until March 2007, President of Hershey Imports and Select Nutrition from December 2004 until August 2006, Corporate Vice President of Special Projects from December 2003 to November 2004 and as our Manager of Special Projects from May 2002 to December 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dziki served as a private consultant to our company, our subsidiaries, Hershey Imports, NRG, and Albert's Organics, and our predecessor company, Cornucopia Natural Foods, Inc., from 1995 to May 2002.Not applicable.


Table of Contents


PART II.

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market® under the symbol "UNFI." Our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market® on November 1, 1996.

        The following table provides information on shares repurchased by the Company. For the periods presented, the shares repurchased were withheld to cover certain employee tax withholding obligations on the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units.

Period
 Total Number of
Shares Repurchased
 Average Price
Paid Per Share
 Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
 Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plan
or Programs
 

May 3, 2009–June 6, 2009

         

June 7, 2009–July 4, 2009

  2,978 $25.56     

July 5, 2009–August 1, 2009

         
 

Total

  2,978 $25.56     

        The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market®:

Fiscal 2008
 High Low 

First Quarter

 $33.33 $24.10 

Second Quarter

  31.87  23.16 

Third Quarter

  25.17  15.60 

Fourth Quarter

  22.25  17.09 

Fiscal 2009
  
  
 
Fiscal 2012
 High Low 

First Quarter

 $28.70 $16.57  $42.53 $35.07 

Second Quarter

 22.75 15.46  44.68 32.83 

Third Quarter

 24.10 12.83  50.37 43.81 

Fourth Quarter

 27.52 21.86  55.86 47.98 

Fiscal 2011

   

First Quarter

 $37.48 $32.65 

Second Quarter

 39.85 34.78 

Third Quarter

 46.05 36.71 

Fourth Quarter

 45.34 39.52 

        On August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, we had approximately 9486 stockholders of record. The number of record holders may not be representative of the number of beneficial holders of our common stock because depositories, brokers or other nominees hold many shares.

        We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We anticipate that all of our earnings in the foreseeable future will be retained to finance the continued growth and development of our business, and we have no current intention to pay cash dividends. Our future dividend policy will depend on our earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, requirements of the financing agreements to which we are then a party and other factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors. OurAdditionally, the terms of our existing revolving credit facility prohibits the declaration or payment ofrestrict us from making any cash dividends to our stockholders without the written consent of the administrative agent under the facilityunless certain conditions and financial tests are met.

        We did not repurchase any shares during the term of the credit agreement and until all of our obligations under the credit agreement have been met.


Table of Contentsfourth quarter ended July 28, 2012.

Comparative Stock Performance

        The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on (i) an index of Food Service Distributors and Grocery Wholesalers and (ii) The NASDAQ Composite Index. The comparison assumes the investment of $100 on July 31, 200428, 2007 in our common stock and in each of the indices and, in each case, assumes reinvestment of all dividends. The stock price performance shown below is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

        The index of Food Service Distributors and Grocery Wholesalers (referred to below as the "Peer Group") includes Nash Finch Company, SuperValu, Inc. and SYSCO Corporation. PFG was removed from the peer groupPeer Group in 2008 following its acquisition by another company.

        This performance graph shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by


Table of Contents

reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or the Exchange Act.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among United Natural Foods, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index,
and Index of Food Distributors and Wholesalers


*
$100 Investedinvested on 7/31/0428/07 in stock or 7/31/07 in index, including reinvestment of dividends. Indexes calculated on month-end basis.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

        The selected consolidated financial data presented below are derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with and is qualified by reference to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Consolidated Statement of Income Data:(1)
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 July 28,
2007
 July 29,
2006
 July 31,
2005
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Net sales

 $3,454,900 $3,365,857 $2,754,280 $2,433,594 $2,059,568 

Cost of sales

  2,794,419  2,731,965  2,244,702  1,967,684  1,664,523 
            

Gross profit

  660,481  633,892  509,578  465,910  395,045 

Operating expenses

  550,560  541,413  415,337  385,982  322,345 

Impairment on assets held for sale

      756     

Restructuring and asset impairment charges

          170 
            

Total operating expenses

  550,560  541,413  416,093  385,982  322,515 
            

Operating income

  109,921  92,479  93,485  79,928  72,530 

Other expense (income):

                

Interest expense

  9,914  16,133  12,089  11,210  6,568 

Interest income

  (450) (768) (975) (297) (243)

Other, net

  275  (82) 156  (381) (847)
            

Total other expense

  9,739  15,283  11,270  10,532  5,478 
            

Income before income taxes

  100,182  77,196  82,215  69,396  67,052 

Provision for income taxes

  40,998  28,717  32,062  26,119  25,480 
            

Net income

 $59,184 $48,479 $50,153 $43,277 $41,572 
            

Per share data—Basic:

                

Net income

 $1.38 $1.14 $1.18 $1.04 $1.02 
            

Weighted average basic shares of common stock

  42,849  42,690  42,445  41,682  40,639 
            

Per share data—Diluted:

                

Net income

 
$

1.38
 
$

1.13
 
$

1.17
 
$

1.02
 
$

1.00
 
            

Weighted average diluted shares of common stock

  42,993  42,855  42,786  42,304  41,607 
            

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

August 1,
2009

 

August 2,
2008

 

July 28,
2007

 

July 29,
2006

 

July 31,
2005

 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Working capital

 $169,053 $110,897 $216,518 $182,931 $119,385 

Total assets

  1,058,550  1,084,483  800,898  704,551  651,258 

Total long term debt and capital leases, excluding current portion

  53,858  58,485  65,067  59,716  64,871 

Total stockholders' equity

 $544,472 $480,050 $426,795 $363,474 $295,519 

Consolidated Statement of Income Data:(1)
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 July 31,
2010
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 
 
  
  
  
  
 (53 weeks)
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Net sales

 $5,236,021 $4,530,015 $3,757,139 $3,454,900 $3,365,857 

Cost of sales

  4,320,018  3,705,205  3,060,208  2,794,419  2,731,965 
            

Gross profit

  916,003  824,810  696,931  660,481  633,892 

Operating expenses

  755,744  688,859  582,029  550,560  541,413 

Restructuring and asset impairment expense

  5,101  6,270       
            

Total operating expenses

  760,845  695,129  582,029  550,560  541,413 
            

Operating income

  155,158  129,681  114,902  109,921  92,479 

Other expense (income):

                

Interest expense

  4,734  5,000  5,845  9,914  16,133 

Interest income

  (715) (1,226) (247) (450) (768)

Other, net

  356  (528) (2,698) 275  (82)
            

Total other expense

  4,375  3,246  2,900  9,739  15,283 
            

Income before income taxes

  150,783  126,435  112,002  100,182  77,196 

Provision for income taxes

  59,441  49,762  43,681  40,998  28,717 
            

Net income

 $91,342 $76,673 $68,321 $59,184 $48,479 
            

Per share data—Basic:

                

Net income

 $1.87 $1.62 $1.58 $1.38 $1.14 
            

Weighted average basic shares of common stock

  48,766  47,459  43,184  42,849  42,690 
            

Per share data—Diluted:

                

Net income

 $1.86 $1.60 $1.57 $1.38 $1.13 
            

Weighted average diluted shares of common stock

  49,100  47,815  43,425  42,993  42,855 
            


Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 July 31,
2010
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Working capital

 $612,700 $381,071 $194,190 $169,053 $110,897 

Total assets

  1,493,946  1,400,988  1,250,799  1,058,550  1,084,483 

Total long-term debt and capital leases, excluding current portion

  635  986  48,433  53,858  58,485 

Total stockholders' equity

 $978,716 $869,667 $630,447 $544,472 $480,050 

(1)
Includes the effect of acquisitions from the date of acquisition.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. In some cases you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plans," "seek," "should," "will," and "would," or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss future expectations, contain projections of future results of operations or of financial positionpositions or state other "forward-looking" information. The

        Forward-looking statements involve inherent uncertainty and may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or actual operating results. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to:

        This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is only a summary of some of the most important factors listedand is not intended to be exhaustive. You should carefully review the risks described under "Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors," as well as any other cautionary language in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations described in these forward-looking statements. You should be aware thatas the occurrence of theany of these events described under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operationsoperation and financial position.condition.


        Any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not guaranteesTable of future performance, and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those envisaged by such forward-looking statements, possibly materially. We do not undertake to update any information in the foregoing reports until the effective date of our future reports required by applicable laws. Any projections of future results of operations should not be construed in any manner as a guarantee that such results will in fact occur. These projections are subject to change and could differ materially from final reported results. We may from time to time update these publicly announced projections, but we are not obligated to do so.Contents

Overview

        We believe we are athe leading national distributor based on sales of natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products in the United States.States and Canada and that our twenty-six distribution centers, representing approximately 6.2 million square feet of warehouse space, provide us with the largest capacity of any North American-based distributor in the natural, organic and specialty products industry. We carryoffer more than 60,00065,000 high-quality natural, organic and specialty foods and non-food products, consisting of national brand,brands, regional brand,brands, private label and master distribution products, in six product categories: grocery and general merchandise, produce, perishables and frozen foods, nutritional supplements and sports nutrition, bulk and food service products and personal care items. We serve more than 17,00023,000 customer locations primarily located across the United States and Canada, the majority of which can be classified into one of the following categories: independently owned natural products retailers;retailers, which include buying clubs; supernatural chains, which are comprisedconsist solely of large chains of natural foods supermarkets; andWhole Foods Market; conventional supermarkets. Our other distribution channelssupermarkets, which include food service, international, mass market chainschains; and buying clubs.other which includes foodservice and international customers outside of Canada.

        Our operations are comprised of three principal operating divisions. These operating divisions are:


Table of Contents

        In recent years, our sales to existing and new customers have increased through the continued growth of the natural and organic products industry in general;general, increased market share throughas a result of our high quality service and a broader product selection, including specialty products, and the acquisition of, or merger with, natural and specialty products distributors;distributors, the expansion of our existing distribution centers; the construction of new distribution centers; the introduction of new products and the development of our own line of natural and organic branded products. Through these efforts, we believe that we have been able to broaden our geographic penetration, expand our customer base, enhance and diversify our product selections and increase our market share.

        We have been the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market our largest customer, for more than 11fourteen years. In August 2007,Effective June 2010, we amended our distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets completed their merger,to extend the term of the agreement for an additional seven years. Under the terms of the amended agreement, we will continue to serve as a result of which, Wild Oats Markets became a wholly-owned subsidiary ofthe primary wholesale natural grocery distributor to Whole Foods Market. We had servedMarket in its United States regions where we were serving as the primary distributor at the time of naturalthe amendment. The amendment extended the expiration date of the agreement from September 25, 2013 to September 25, 2020. On July 28, 2010, we announced that we had entered into an asset purchase agreement under which we agreed to acquire certain assets of Whole Foods Distribution previously used for their self-distribution of non-perishables in their Rocky Mountain and organic foodsSouthwest regions and non-food products for Wild Oats Markets prior to become their primary distributor in these regions. We closed this transaction in late September 2010 in the merger,case of the Southwest region and early October 2010 in the case of the Rocky Mountain region. We now serve as the primary distributor to Whole Foods Market in all of its regions in the United States and have amended our relationshipdistribution agreement with Whole Foods Market expandedeffective


Table of Contents

October 2010 to cover the former Wild Oats Markets stores retained byinclude these regions. Whole Foods Market following the merger. On a combined basis, and excluding sales to Wild Oats Markets' former Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations (which were sold by Whole Foods Market to a subsidiary of Smart & Final Inc. on September 30, 2007, and are now included in the conventional supermarket channel), Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets accounted for approximately 33.1% and 31.0%36% of our net sales for the years ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008, respectively.July 30, 2011.

        On November 2, 2007,In June 2010, we acquired DHIthe SDG assets of SunOpta through our wholly-owned subsidiary, UNFI Canada for total cash consideration of $85.5 million, consisting$65.8 million. With the acquisition, we became the largest distributor of natural, organic and specialty foods, including kosher foods, in Canada. This was a strategic acquisition as UNFI Canada provides us with an immediate platform for growth in the Canadian market. During fiscal 2012, we utilized our UNFI Canada platform to further expand in the Canadian market, including through our purchase of substantially all of the $84.0 million purchase price and $1.5 millionassets of related transaction fees, subject to certain adjustments set fortha specialty food distribution business in the merger agreement. Our specialty distribution division operates distribution centers locatedOntario market in Massachusetts and Arkansas, with customers throughout the United States. Through our specialty distribution division's two distribution centers, which provide approximately 1.4 million square feet of warehouse space, as well as our broadline distribution centers where we have integrated specialty products, weNovember 2011.

        The ability to distribute specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher gourmet, organic and natural foods), health and beauty care items and other non-food items.

        We believe that the acquisition of DHI accomplishes several of our strategic objectives, including acceleratinggourmet) has accelerated our expansion into a number of historically high-growth business segmentsmarkets and establishingallowed us to establish immediate market share in the fast-growing specialty foods market. We have now integrated specialty food products and natural and organic specialty non-food products into most of our broadline distribution centers across the United States and Canada. Due to our expansion into specialty foods, we were awarded new business with a number of conventional supermarkets since fiscal 2010 that we previously had not done business with because we did not distribute specialty products. We believe that DHI's customer basedistribution of these products enhances our conventional supermarket business channel and that our complementary product lines continue to present opportunities for cross-selling. On June 9, 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with L&R Distributors pursuant to which we agreed to sell our conventional non-foods and general merchandise lines of business, including certain inventory related to these product lines. This divestiture was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and has allowed us to concentrate on our core business of the distribution of natural, organic, and specialty foods and non-food products.

        In order toTo maintain our market leadership and improve our operating efficiencies, we seek to continually:


Table of Contents

        Our continued growth has created the need for expansion ofallowed us to expand our existing facilities and open new facilities in an effort to achieve maximumincreasing operating efficiencies and to assure adequate space for future needs.efficiencies. We have made significant capital expenditures and incurred considerable expenses in connection with the opening and expansion of our facilities. We have increasedAt July 28, 2012, our distribution capacity tototaled approximately 6.36.2 million square feet. We openedIn September 2009, we commenced operations of a new facility in Charlotte, North Carolina serving Albert's customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Virginia. In connection with the acquisition of the SDG assets in June 2010, we acquired five distribution centers which provided nationwide presence in Canada with approximately 286,000 square feet of distribution space and the ability to serve all major markets in Canada. In September 2010, we began shipping products from our Sarasota, Florida warehousedistribution center in Lancaster, Texas, which serves customers throughout the first quarterSouthwestern United


Table of fiscal 2008Contents

States, including Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arkansas and Louisiana. In October 2010, in order to reduceconnection with the geographic area served byacquisition of the Rocky Mountain distribution business of Whole Foods Distribution, we took over the operations, including the assumption of an operating lease at a distribution center in Aurora, Colorado, augmenting our Atlanta, Georgia facility,existing Aurora, Colorado distribution center, which was at capacity, in serving customers in Colorado, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico. In April 2012, we believe will contribute to lower transportation costs. Our 237,000leased a new 535,000 square foot distribution center in Ridgefield, Washington commenced operationsAurora, Colorado which is expected to become operational in December 2007the summer of 2013 and serves as a regionalwill replace our existing two broadline distribution hub for customers in Portland, Oregon and other Northwest markets. Our 613,000 square footcenters, an Albert's distribution center in Moreno Valley, California commenced operations in September 2008 and serves our customers in Southern California, Arizona, Southern Nevada, Southern Utah, and Hawaii. Our newly leased, 675,000 square foot distribution center in York, Pennsylvania commenced operations in January 2009, and replaces our New Oxford, Pennsylvania facility serving customers in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia. In April 2009, we successfully relocated our UNFI Specialty distribution facility in East Brunswick, New Jersey to the York, Pennsylvania distribution center, creating our first fully integrated facility offering a full assortment of natural, organic, and specialty foods. Finally, in September 2009 we announced plans to open a distribution center in Texas, with operations scheduled to commence in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.an off-site storage location.

        Our net sales consist primarily of sales of natural, organic and specialty products to retailers, adjusted for customer volume discounts, returns and allowances. Net sales also consist of amounts charged by us to customers for shipping and handling and fuel surcharges. The principal components of our cost of sales include the amounts paid to manufacturers and growers for product sold, plus the cost of transportation necessary to bring the product to our distribution facilities.centers. Cost of sales also includes amounts incurred by us at our manufacturing subsidiary, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, for inbound transportation costs and depreciation for manufacturing equipment, andoffset by consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase or promotion of the suppliers' products. Our gross margin may not be comparable to other similar companies within our industry that may include all costs related to their distribution network in their costs of sales rather than as operating expenses. We include purchasing and outbound transportation expenses within our operating expenses rather than in our cost of sales. Total operating expenses include salaries and wages, employee benefits (including payments under our Employee Stock Ownership Plan), warehousing and delivery, selling, occupancy, insurance, administrative, share-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expense. Other expenses (income) include interest on our outstanding indebtedness, interest income and miscellaneous income and expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Securities and Exchange Commission has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require our most difficult, complex or subjective judgments or estimates. Based on this definition, we believe our critical accounting policies are: (i) determining our allowance for doubtful accounts, (ii) determining our reserves for the self-insured portions of our workers' compensation and automobile liabilities and (iii) valuing goodwill and intangible assets. For all financial statement periods presented, there have been no material modifications to the application of these critical accounting policies.


Table of Contents

        We analyze customer creditworthiness, accounts receivable balances, payment history, payment terms and historical bad debt levels when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts. In instances where a reserve has been recorded for a particular customer, future sales to the customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely monitored so that as agreed upon payments are received, orders are released; a failure to pay results in held or cancelled orders. Our accounts receivable balance was $179.5$305.2 million and $179.1$257.1 million, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of $7.0$6.2 million and $5.5$4.5 million, as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, respectively. Our notes receivable balances were $4.0$3.7 million and $3.8$5.0 million, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.9$0.7 million and $1.6$1.3 million, as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, respectively.


Table of Contents

        We are primarily self-insured for workers' compensation, and general and automobile liability insurance. It is our policy to record the self-insured portions of our workers' compensation and automobile liabilities based upon actuarial methods of estimating the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not yet reported. Any projection of losses concerning workers' compensation and automobile liability is subject to a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. If actual claims incurred are greater than those anticipated, our reserves may be insufficient and additional costs could be recorded in our consolidated financial statements. Accruals for workers' compensation and automobile liabilities totaled $14.7$19.5 million and $12.5$17.5 million as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, respectively.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," requires that companies        We are required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. We have elected to perform our annual tests for indications of goodwill impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. Impairment lossesWe test for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which are at or one level below the operating segment level. Beginning in fiscal 2012, the first step in our annual assessment of each of our reporting units is a qualitative assessment as allowed under ASU 2011-08,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011-08"), unless we believe it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than the carrying value. In order to qualify for an exclusion from the quantitative two-step goodwill test, the thresholds used by the Company for this determination are that a reporting unit must (1) have passed its previous two-step test with a margin of calculated fair value versus carrying value of at least 10%, (2) have had no significant changes to its working capital structure, and (3) have current year income streams which are at least 85% of prior year amounts. For reporting units which do not meet this exclusion, the quantitative goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, involves comparing each reporting unit's estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. Each reporting unit regularly prepares discrete operating forecasts and uses these forecasts as the basis for the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment. If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated potential impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined based uponin a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by measuring the excess of carrying amounts over discounted expected future cash flowsthe estimated fair value of the underlying business. For reporting units that indicate potential impairment, we determineunit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of thatgoodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, usingthere is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a discountedreporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.

        During the first quarter of the 2011 fiscal year, we performed a test for goodwill impairment as a result of the expected change in future cash flow analysisflows for certain of our branded product lines within our Blue Marble Brands reporting unit, and compare such values to the respective reporting units' carrying amounts.determined that no impairment existed. As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, our annual assessment of each of our reporting units indicated that no impairment of goodwill existed. Approximately 91% of our goodwill is within our wholesale reporting unit. Both our wholesale distribution reporting unit and our Earth Origins Market reporting unit were evaluated under the


Table of Contents

qualitative guidelines described above and did not require the quantitative two-step test. Our Blue Marble Brands and Woodstock Farms Manufacturing reporting units were subject to the two-step quantitative test, and each exceeded their carrying values by more than 10%, and were not considered at risk of failing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. We believe that these projected results are achievable, though these assumptions are based upon our current business model and may be negatively affected if we attempt to dispose of any of our brands, stores or facilities or substantially change how we market and sell our products. For all of our assessments, the weighted average cost of capital used in calculating the present value of future cash flows was 12.0%. Total goodwill as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008July 30, 2011 was $164.3$193.7 million and $170.6$191.9 million, respectively.

        Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment at least annually and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the value of the asset may be impaired. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value. There was noAs of our most recent annual impairment totest, the fair value of our indefinite lived intangible assets during 2009.was in excess of their carrying value. The fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets related to our branded product lines was more than 100% in excess of its carrying value. During fiscal 2012, our long-term plans related to the trade name of a portion of our Canadian wholesale distribution business evolved, and we decided to phase out this trade name. As a result, we will begin amortizing this trade name over a period of ten years. As the underlying business will not be changing significantly but rather we will simply be phasing out the trade name, it was not tested for impairment. The projections used in the impairment assessment for the branded product line asset group assume sales growth of approximately 10% per year, with gross margin and operating expenses which on average approximate current levels as a percentage of sales. We believe these projections are reasonable based on our historical trends and expectation of future results. Total indefinite lived intangible assets as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008July 30, 2011 were $27.4$28.2 million and $25.9$28.9 million, respectively.

        Intangible assets with finite lives are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets are estimated over the asset's useful life based on updated projections. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow model. There werehave been no indicatorsevents or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of


Table of Contents


impairment our finite-lived intangibles are not recoverable during 2009.2012. Total finite-lived intangible assets as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008July 30, 2011 were $10.9$24.3 million and $7.8$29.5 million, respectively.

        The assessment of the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets will be impacted if estimated future cash flows are not achieved.


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

        The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain income and expense items expressed as a percentage of net sales:

 
 Year ended 
 
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 July 28,
2007
 

Net sales

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of sales

  80.9% 81.2% 81.5%
        
  

Gross profit

  19.1% 18.8% 18.5%
        

Operating expenses

  15.9% 16.1% 15.1%

Impairment on assets held for sale

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
        
  

Total operating expenses

  15.9% 16.1% 15.1%
        
  

Operating income

  3.2% 2.7% 3.4%
        

Other expense (income):

          
 

Interest expense

  0.3% 0.5% 0.4%
 

Interest income

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
 

Other, net

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
        
 

Total other expense

  0.3% 0.5% 0.4%
        
 

Income before income taxes

  2.9% 2.3%* 3.0%

Provision for income taxes

  1.2% 0.9% 1.2%
        
  

Net income

  1.7% 1.4% 1.8%
        


*
Total reflects rounding

        Note: Our 2008 fiscal year included 53 weeks of operations while our 2009 and 2007 fiscal years included 52 weeks of operations.

 
 Year ended 
 
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 July 31,
2010
 

Net sales

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of sales

  82.5% 81.8% 81.5%
        

Gross profit

  17.5% 18.2% 18.5%
        

Operating expenses

  14.4% 15.2% 15.4%

Restructuring and asset impairment expenses

  0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
        

Total operating expenses

  14.5% 15.3% 15.4%
        

Operating income

  3.0% 2.9% 3.1%
        

Other expense (income):

          

Interest expense

  0.1% 0.1% 0.2%

Interest income

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Other, net

  0.0% 0.0% (0.1%)
        

Total other expense

  0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
        

Income before income taxes

  2.9% 2.8% 3.0%

Provision for income taxes

  1.1% 1.1% 1.2%
        

Net income

  1.8% 1.7% 1.8%
        

Fiscal year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 compared to fiscal year ended August 2, 2008July 30, 2011

        Our net sales for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 increased approximately 2.6%15.6%, or $89.0$706.0 million, to a record $3.5$5.2 billion for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012 from $3.4$4.5 billion for the year ended August 2, 2008, which included an extra week.July 30, 2011. This increase was primarily due to growth in our wholesale segment of $702.8 million, which includes net sales from a national conventional supermarket customer that began shipping in October 2011 and the strong performance of our UNFI Canada division. Our organic growth (sales growth excluding the impact of acquisitions) in our wholesale distribution division of $82.9 million. Our organic growth is due to the continued growth of the natural and organic products industry in general, increased market share as a result of our focus on service and value added value services, and the opening of new, and expansion of existing, distribution centers, which allow us to carry a broader selection of products, including specialty foods. We believe that the integration of our specialty business has allowed us to attract customers that we would not have been able to attract without that business as many customers seek a single source for their natural, organic and specialty products. Our net sales for the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 were also favorably impacted by moderate price inflation.

        In addition to net sales growth attributable to our organic growth, we also benefited from the inclusion of product$25.4 million in incremental net sales resulting from the three branded product companies we acquiredexpanded distribution to Whole Foods Market during fiscal 2009. We acquired UNFI Specialty on2012 following the acquisition of Whole Foods Distributions's Southwest and Rocky Mountain distribution business and expanded distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and approximately $4.2 million in sales resulting from our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of a specialty food distribution business in the Ontario market in November 2, 2007, and therefore our results for the year ended August 2, 2008 include amounts attributable to this business for only approximately nine months.2011.


Table of Contents

        On a combined basis, and excluding sales to Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations, which were divested by Whole Foods Market following its merger with Wild Oats Markets, Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets accounted for approximately 33.1% and 31.0% of ourOur net sales for the years ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008, respectively. The Henry's and Sun Harvest locations divested by Whole Foods Market remain our customers, and are classified in the conventional supermarket channel.

        The following table lists the percentage of sales by customer type for the years ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008:July 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

 
 Percentage
of Net Sales
 
Customer Type
 2009 2008 

Independently owned natural products retailers

  42% 42%

Supernatural chains

  33% 31%

Conventional supermarkets

  20% 23%

Other

  5% 4%

Customer Type
 2012
Net Sales
 % of Total
Net Sales
 2011
Net Sales
 % of Total
Net Sales
 

Independently owned natural products retailers

 $1,847  35%$1,693  37%

Supernatural chains

  1,883  36% 1,627  36%

Conventional supermarkets

  1,246  24% 991  22%

Other

  260  5% 219  5%
      ��   

Total

 $5,236  100%$4,530  100%

        Net sales to our independent retailer channel increased by approximately $154 million, or 9.1% during the year ended July 28, 2012 compared to the year ended July 30, 2011. While net sales in this channel have increased, they have grown at a slower rate than net sales in our supernatural and conventional supermarket channels, and therefore represent a lower percentage of our total net sales compared to the prior year.

        Whole Foods Market is our only supernatural chain customer, and net sales to Whole Foods Market for the year ended July 28, 2012 increased by approximately $256 million or 15.8% over the prior year and accounted for approximately 36% of our total net sales for the years ended July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011. The decreaseincrease in sales to Whole Foods Market is primarily due to the increases in same-store sales, and to a lesser extent, the expanded primary distribution agreement noted above.

        Net sales to conventional supermarkets for the year ended July 28, 2012 increased by approximately $255 million, or 25.7% from fiscal 2011 and represented approximately 24% of total net sales in fiscal 2012 compared to 22% in fiscal 2011. The increase in net sales to conventional supermarkets is primarily due to a large national customer which we began servicing during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as part of our strategy to be the sole supplier of natural, organic and specialty products to our conventional supermarket customers.

        Other net sales, which include sales to foodservice and sales from the United States to countries other than Canada, as well as sales through our retail division, manufacturing division, and our branded product lines, increased by approximately $41 million or 18.7% during the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012 over the prior fiscal year and accounted for approximately 5% of total net sales in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011.

        As we continue to aggressively pursue new customers and as economic conditions continue to stabilize, we expect net sales for fiscal 2013 to grow over fiscal 2012. We believe that the integration of our specialty business into our national platform has allowed us to attract customers that we would not have been able to attract without that business and will continue to allow us to pursue a broader array of customers as many customers seek a single source for their natural, organic and specialty products. We believe that our projected sales growth will come from both sales to new customers and an increase in the number of products that we sell to existing customers. We expect that most of this sales growth will occur in our lower gross margin supernatural and conventional supermarket channels. Although sales to these customers typically generate lower gross margins than sales to customers within our independent retailer channel, isthey also typically carry a lower average cost to serve than sales to our independent customers. We also believe that food price inflation similar to the resultlevels experienced in the second half of customer losses within UNFI Specialty that werefiscal 2012 will contribute to our projected net sales growth in process before our acquisition of DHI.fiscal 2013.

        Our gross profit increased approximately 4.2%11.1%, or $26.6$91.2 million, to $660.5$916.0 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, from $633.9$824.8 million for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. Our gross profit as a


Table of Contents

percentage of net sales was 17.5% for the year ended July 28, 2012 and 18.2% for the year ended July 30, 2011. The change in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 19.1%is primarily due to the change in the mix of net sales by channel that began during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as well as higher inventory shrink related to perishable items and improper storage of products in certain categories, and use of third parties for inbound freight during fiscal 2012, partially offset by higher fuel surcharge revenue during the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012.

        Our gross profits are generally higher on net sales to independently owned retailers and 18.8% forlower on net sales in the conventional supermarket and the supernatural channels. For the year ended August 2, 2008. GrossJuly 28, 2012 approximately $512 million of our total net sales growth of $706 million was from increased net sales in the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels. As a result, approximately 60% of our total net sales in fiscal 2012 were to the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels compared to approximately 58% in fiscal 2011. This change in sales mix from 2011 to 2012 resulted in lower gross profits as a percentage of sales during fiscal 2012. We anticipate net sales growth in the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels will continue to outpace growth in the independent and other channels.

        We expect that our growth with Whole Foods Market and our opportunities in the conventional supermarket channel will continue to generate lower gross profit percentages than our historical rates, particularly during the time period when we are on-boarding new business and incurring costs of hiring and training additional associates and increasing inventory levels before a new customer has reached expected purchasing levels. We will seek to fully offset these reductions in gross profit percentages by reducing our operating expenses as a percentage of net sales during the year ended August 1, 2009 was positively impacted by sales from UNFI Specialty, fuel surcharge revenues, and sales of our branded product lines. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the year ended August 2, 2008 was negatively impacted by missed forward buying opportunities in that period.

        We continue to expect UNFI Specialty's full service supermarket model to generate a higher gross margin over the long-termprimarily through improved efficiencies in our core distribution business; however, we also expect to incur higher operating expenses in providing those services. Under this model, we provide services typically performed by supermarket employeessupply chain and improvements to our customers, such as stocking shelves, placing sales orders and rotating out damaged and expired products. We continue to focus on increasing our branded product revenues through our Blue Marble Brands division, which we believe will allow us to generate higher gross margins over the long-term, as branded product revenues generally yield higher margins.information technology infrastructure.

        Our total operating expenses increased approximately 1.7%9.5%, or $9.1$65.7 million, to $550.6$760.8 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, from $541.4$695.1 million for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. The increase in total operating expenses for the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 was primarily due to increases in information technologyhigher sales volume, $5.1 million of severance and other restructuring expenses fixed asset depreciation, health insurance expense, and amortization expense related to certainassociated with the divestiture of our intangibles resulting from the purchaseconventional non-food and general merchandise lines of DHI, partially offset by expense control programs across all of the Company's divisions. We have been able to partially offset the effect of rising fuel prices by increasing delivery sizes, improving route designbusiness and by opening new facilities which reduce the total distance traveled to customers. We$1.6 million in start-up expenses incurred higher operatingin connection with onboarding a large national conventional supermarket customer. Operating expenses duringfor the year ended August 2, 2008 related to our branded product lines, as we built our infrastructure to support anticipated new business, andJuly 30, 2011 included $6.3 million in laborrestructuring and start-up expenses related toasset impairment charges associated with the divestiture of our new distribution facilities in Sarasota, Florida, Ridgefield, Washington, Moreno Valley, Californiaconventional non-foods and York, Pennsylvania.


Tablegeneral merchandise lines of Contentsbusiness.

        Total operating expenses for fiscal 2009 includes2012 include share-based compensation expense of $5.5$11.4 million, compared to $4.7$9.2 million in fiscal 2008.2011. Share-based compensation expense for the years ended July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011 includes approximately $1.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in expense related to performance share-based awards granted to our Chief Executive Officer related to certain financial goals for those various periods ended July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011. During fiscal 2012, $0.4 million was recognized related to a new performance-based equity compensation arrangement with a 2-year performance-based vesting component that was established for members of our executive leadership team. See Note 3 "Stock Option"Equity Plans" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        As a percentage of net sales, total operating expenses decreased to approximately 15.9%14.5% for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, from approximately 16.1%15.3% for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. The decrease in total operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to the growth in the supernatural and conventional supermarket channels which in general have lower operating expenses, higher fixed cost coverage due to higher sales, as well as expense control programs across all of our


Table of Contents

divisions. We were able to manage our fuel costs despite rising prices by locking in the price of a portion of our expected fuel usage, updating and revising existing routes to reduce miles traveled, reducing idle times and other similar measures. Our expansion into Lancaster, Texas, where our facility began servicing customers in late September 2010, has helped to further reduce our fuel costs as wella percentage of net sales as lowerwe are able to reduce the number of miles traveled to serve our customers in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arkansas and Louisiana who were previously primarily served from our facility in Denver, Colorado. These improvements in our operating expenses related to UNFI Specialty. During the year ended August 1, 2009, we incurred $7.2 millionwere offset in labor, lease termination, and start-up expenses related to our new distribution facilities in Moreno Valley, California and York, Pennsylvaniapart by higher health insurance costs, higher workers' compensation costs and the closing of our East Brunswick, New Jersey facility.above described higher share-based compensation costs. We expect that the opening of new facilitieswe will contribute efficiencies and lead to lower operating expenses related to sales over the long-term. As noted above, however, we expectbe able to continue to incurreduce our operating expenses higher thanas we historically have experienced ascontinue the roll-out of our supply chain initiatives including a resultnational warehouse management and procurement system, which was first launched in the Lancaster, Texas facility in September 2010, launched in the Ridgefield, Washington facility in July 2012 and is expected to be rolled out in all of UNFI Specialty's full service supermarket model.our distribution centers by the end of fiscal 2015.

        Operating income increased approximately 18.9%19.7%, or $17.4$25.5 million, to $109.9$155.2 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, from $92.5$129.7 million for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 3.2%3.0% for the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 compared to 2.7%2.9% for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. The increase in operating income is primarily attributable to sales growth and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales during fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.

        Other expense (income) decreased $5.5increased $1.2 million to $9.7$4.4 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, from $15.3$3.2 million for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. Interest expense for the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 decreased to $9.9$4.7 million from $16.1$5.0 million in the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011, but was negatively impacted by $0.3 million related to the settlement in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 of the interest rate swap that we entered into in July 2005 in connection with our term loan that we paid off in May 2012. The decrease in interest expense was due primarily to the decrease inlower average debt levels as we managed our inventory balances, as well asduring the decrease in interest rates.year. Interest income for the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 decreased to $0.5$0.7 million from $0.8$1.2 million in the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011, primarily as a result of lower average cash balances during the year.

        Our effective income tax rate was 40.9% and 37.2%39.4% for the years ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011. Our effective income tax rate in both fiscal years was primarily affected by state taxes in the states in which we operate.

        Reflecting the factors described in more detail above, net income increased $14.7 million to $91.3 million, or $1.86 per diluted share, for the year ended July 28, 2012, compared to $76.7 million, or $1.60 per diluted share on a lower share base, for the year ended July 30, 2011.

Fiscal year ended July 30, 2011 compared to fiscal year ended July 31, 2010

        Our net sales for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2011 increased approximately 20.6%, or $772.9 million, to a record $4.5 billion for the year ended July 30, 2011 from $3.8 billion for the year ended July 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to growth in our wholesale segment of $774.3 million, which includes the growth resulting from our entrance into the Canadian market in June 2010 and the expansion of our primary distribution agreement with Whole Foods Market in


Table of Contents

October 2010. Our organic growth is due to the continued growth of the natural products industry in general, increased market share as a result of our focus on service and value added services, and the breadth of our product selection. In addition, we believe that the integration of our specialty business has allowed us to attract customers that we would not have been able to attract without that business as many customers seek a single source for their natural, organic and specialty products. Our net sales for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2011 were also favorably impacted by moderate price inflation.

        In addition to net sales growth attributable to our organic growth, we also benefited from the inclusion of $200.7 million in sales from UNFI Canada, which includes the SDG assets acquired during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, and approximately $131.6 million in incremental sales to Whole Foods Market due to the acquisition of Whole Foods Distribution's Southwest and Rocky Mountain distribution business in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and our expanded distribution agreement in October 2010.

        Our net sales by customer type for the years ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 were as follows (in millions):

Customer Type
 2011
Net Sales
 % of Total
Net Sales
 2010
Net Sales
 % of Total
Net Sales
 

Independently owned natural products retailers

 $1,693  37%$1,506  40%

Supernatural chains

 $1,627  36%$1,317  35%

Conventional supermarkets

 $991  22%$771  21%

Other

 $219  5%$163  4%
          

Total

 $4,530  100%$3,757  100%

        Net sales to our independent retailer channel increased by approximately $187 million, or 12.4% during the year ended July 30, 2011 compared to the year ended July 31, 2010. While net sales in this channel have increased, they have grown at a slower rate than net sales in our supernatural and conventional supermarket channels, and therefore represent a lower percentage of our total net sales compared to the prior year.

        Whole Foods Market is our only supernatural chain customer, and net sales to Whole Foods Market for the year ended July 30, 2011 increased by approximately $310 million or 23.6% over the prior year and accounted for approximately 36% and 35% of our total net sales for the years ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The increase in sales to Whole Foods Market is primarily due to the increases in same-store sales, as well as the expanded primary distribution agreement noted above.

        Net sales to conventional supermarkets for the year ended July 30, 2011 increased by approximately $220 million, or 28.5% from fiscal 2010 and represented approximately 22% of total net sales in fiscal 2011 compared to 21% in fiscal 2010. The increase in net sales to conventional supermarkets is primarily due to several large new customers won during the year based on our consolidated market strategy of natural, organic and specialty from one supplier, as well as $92.5 million of net sales to conventional supermarkets by UNFI Canada.

        Other net sales, which include sales to foodservice and sales from the United States to countries other than Canada, increased by approximately $56 million or 34.3% during the fiscal year ended July 30, 2011 over the prior fiscal year and accounted for approximately 5% of total net sales in fiscal 2011 compared to 4% of total net sales for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010.

        The decrease in sales percentage to the independent channel is the result of the higher growth rate in our supernatural chain as a result of an increase in Whole Foods Market business, and in our conventional supermarkets.


Table of Contents

        Our gross profit increased approximately 18.3%, or $127.9 million, to $824.8 million for the year ended July 30, 2011, from $696.9 million for the year ended July 31, 2010. Our gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 18.2% for the year ended July 30, 2011 and 18.5% for the year ended July 31, 2010. The change in gross profit as a percentage of net sales is primarily due to the change in the mix of net sales by channel that began during the second fiscal quarter of 2010 and start up costs related to inventory issues and incremental freight and service costs incurred during the first half of fiscal 2011 in connection with the initial period of operations of our Lancaster, Texas distribution center, partially offset by higher fuel surcharge revenue during the year ended July 30, 2011.

        Our gross profits are generally higher on net sales to independently owned retailers and lower on net sales in the conventional supermarket and the supernatural channels. For the year ended July 30, 2011 approximately $530 million of our total net sales growth was from increased net sales in the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels, while net sales growth from the independent and other channels was approximately $243 million. As a result, approximately 58% of our total net sales in fiscal 2011 were to the conventional supermarket and supernatural channels compared to approximately 56% in fiscal 2010. This change in sales mix from 2010 to 2011 resulted in lower gross profits as a percentage of sales during fiscal 2011.

        Our total operating expenses increased approximately 19.4%, or $113.1 million, to $695.1 million for the year ended July 30, 2011, from $582.0 million for the year ended July 31, 2010. The increase in total operating expenses for the year ended July 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher sales volume including sales through our UNFI Canada subsidiary, $4.4 million of labor and other expenses associated with the September 2010 opening of our Lancaster, Texas facility and incremental start up inefficiencies which continued through January 2011, $0.6 million for severance payments for former executives and $6.3 million in restructuring and asset impairment charges associated with the divestiture of our conventional non-foods and general merchandise lines of business.

        Unallocated corporate expenses have increased $2.0 million during the year ended July 30, 2011 compared to the year ended July 31, 2010, primarily due to the continued development of a national platform across many functional areas including warehouse management, inbound logistics and category management.

        Total operating expenses for fiscal 2011 include share-based compensation expense of $9.2 million, compared to $8.1 million in fiscal 2010. Share-based compensation expense for the years ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 includes approximately $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in expense related to the performance share-based awards granted to our Chief Executive Officer related to certain financial goals for those various periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010. See Note 3 "Equity Plans" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        As a percentage of net sales, total operating expenses decreased to approximately 15.3% for the year ended July 30, 2011, from approximately 15.5% for the year ended July 31, 2010. The decrease in total operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to the growth in the supernatural and conventional supermarket channels which in general have lower operating expenses, as well as expense control programs across all of our divisions. We were able to manage our fuel costs despite rising prices by locking in the price of a portion of our expected fuel usage, updating and revising existing routes to reduce miles traveled, reducing idle times and other similar measures. Our expansion into Lancaster, Texas, where our new leased facility began servicing customers in late September 2010, has helped to further reduce our fuel costs as a percentage of net sales as we are able to reduce the number of miles traveled to serve our customers in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico,


Table of Contents

Arkansas and Louisiana who were previously primarily served from our facility in Denver, Colorado. These improvements in our operating expenses were offset in part by higher health insurance costs, higher workers' compensation costs and the above described higher incentive compensation costs.

        Operating income increased approximately 12.9%, or $14.8 million, to $129.7 million for the year ended July 30, 2011, from $114.9 million for the year ended July 31, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 2.9% for the year ended July 30, 2011 compared to 3.1% for the year ended July 31, 2010. The decrease in operating income is primarily attributable to the increase in total operating expenses during fiscal 2011, including the $6.3 million recognized for restructuring and asset impairment expenses, compared to fiscal 2010.

        Other expense (income) increased $0.3 million to $3.2 million for the year ended July 30, 2011, from $2.9 million for the year ended July 31, 2010. Interest expense for the year ended July 30, 2011 decreased to $5.0 million from $5.8 million in the year ended July 31, 2010. The decrease in interest expense was due primarily to lower average debt levels during the year as we used a portion of the $138.3 million in proceeds from our secondary public offering completed in October 2010 to pay down our debt balances which had increased significantly in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as we financed our purchase of the SDG assets from SunOpta with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. In connection with the expected purchase of the SDG assets, we entered into a forward contract to swap United States dollars for Canadian dollars. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we recognized a gain of $2.8 million, which was recorded in other income, upon settlement of the contract. Interest income for the year ended July 30, 2011 increased to $1.2 million from $0.2 million in the year ended July 31, 2010, primarily as a result of higher average cash balances during the year.

        Our effective income tax rate was 39.4% and 39.0% for the years ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rate for the year ended August 1, 2009 wasJuly 30, 2011 is primarily due to increases in effective state taxes. The effective income tax rate for the year ended August 2, 2008 was lower than our historical effective rate primarily due to tax credits associated with the solar panel installation projects at our Rocklin, California and Dayville, Connecticut distribution facilities. This decrease was offset by an increase in our effective income tax rate due to the acquisition of DHI.rates. Our effective income tax rate in both fiscal years was also affected by share-based compensation for incentive stock options and the timing of disqualifying dispositions of certain share-based compensation awards. Certain incentive stock option expenses are not deductible for tax purposes untilunless a disqualifying disposition occurs. A disqualifying disposition occurs when the option holder sells shares within one year of exercising an incentive stock option and within two years of original grant. We receive a tax benefit in the period that the disqualifying disposition occurs. Our effective income tax rate will continue to be effected by the tax impact related to incentive stock options and the timing of tax benefits related to disqualifying dispositions.

        Reflecting the factors described in more detail above, net income increased $8.4 million to $76.7 million, or $1.60 per diluted share, for the year ended July 30, 2011, compared to $68.3 million, or $1.57 per diluted share on a lower share base, for the year ended July 31, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        In fiscalOctober 2010, we expectcompleted a secondary public offering of our effective tax ratecommon stock. As a result, 4,427,500 shares of common stock, including shares issued to be incover the rangeunderwriters' overallotment option, were issued at a price of 40.0% to 41.0%.$33.00 per share. The net proceeds of approximately $138.3 million


Table of Contents

        Net income increased $10.7 millionwere used to $59.2 million, or $1.38 per diluted share, for the year ended August 1, 2009, compared to $48.5 million, or $1.13 per diluted share, for the year ended August 2, 2008.

Fiscal year ended August 2, 2008 compared to fiscal year ended July 28, 2007

        Our net sales increased approximately 22.2%, or $611.6 million, to $3.4 billion for the year ended August 2, 2008, from $2.8 billion for the year ended July 28, 2007. This increase was primarily due to sales from our newly acquired UNFI Specialty business of $211.4 million as well as organic growth (sales growth excluding the impact of acquisitions) in our wholesale distribution division of $389.1 million, or 14.4%. Further, approximately 2% of the increase in net sales was attributable to the extra week included in fiscal 2008. Our organic growth was due to the continued growth of the natural products industry in general, increased market share asrepay a resultportion of our focus on service and added value services, and the opening of new, and expansion of existing, distribution centers, which allowed us to carry a broader selection of products. In addition to net sales growth attributable to UNFI Specialty andoutstanding borrowings under our organic growth, we also benefited from the inclusion of sales of products we acquired from Organic Brands, LLC ("Organic Brands") and acquisitions of and other branded product lines during fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. However, these acquisitions impacted our cost of sales and gross profit more than they impacted our net sales.

        On a combined basis, and excluding sales to Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations, which were divested by Whole Foods Market following its merger with Wild Oats Markets, Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets accounted for approximately 31.0% and 34.7% of our net sales for the years ended August 2, 2008 and July 28, 2007, respectively. The Henry's and Sun Harvest locations divested by Whole Foods Market remain our customers, and are classified in the conventional supermarket channel.

        The following table lists the percentage of sales by customer type for the years ended August 2, 2008 and July 28, 2007:

 
 Percentage of Net Sales 
Customer Type
 2008 2007 

Independently owned natural products retailers

  42% 45%

Supernatural chains

  31% 35%

Conventional supermarkets

  23% 16%

Other

  4% 4%

        Sales to Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations have been reclassified from our supernatural chains channel into our conventional supermarket channel in both fiscal years 2008 and 2007 and will continue in this classification going forward. This reclassification resulted in an increase in sales in the conventional supermarket channel of 1.7% and a decrease in sales in the supernatural chains channel of 1.7% for the year ended July 28, 2007. In addition, sales by channel have been adjusted to reflect changes in customer types resulting from a review of our customer lists. As a result of this adjustment, sales to the independents sales channel increased 0.9% for the year ended July 28, 2007 and sales to the conventional supermarket sales channel decreased 0.9% for the year ended July 28, 2007. The overall decrease in sales to the independents and supernatural channels and the increase in sales to the supermarket channel was primarily due to the acquisition of DHI in November 2007, as our specialty distribution division primarily distributes to the supermarket channel.


Table of Contents

        Our gross profit increased approximately 24.4%, or $124.3 million, to $633.9 million for the year ended August 2, 2008, from $509.6 million for the year ended July 28, 2007. Our gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 18.8% for the year ended August 2, 2008 and 18.5% for the year ended July 28, 2007. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales during the year ended August 2, 2008 was positively impacted by sales from the UNFI Specialty business and sales of our branded product lines. We worked to take advantage of forward buying opportunities during the year ended August 2, 2008 in order to improve UNFI Specialty's gross margin. We continue to expect UNFI Specialty's full service supermarket model, to generate a higher gross margin over the long-term in our core distribution business; however, we also expect to incur higher operating expenses in providing those services. Under this model, we provide services typically performed by supermarket employees to our customers, such as stocking shelves, placing sales orders and rotating out damaged and expired products. We continue to focus on increasing our branded product revenues, which we believe will allow us to generate higher gross margins over the long-term, as branded product revenues generally yield higher margins.

        Gross profit as a percentage of net sales during the year ended July 28, 2007 was negatively impacted by missed forward buying opportunities, the full year effect of new customer agreements, $0.5 million of spoilage issues related to certain inventory of Albert's, and $1.9 million of incremental inventory adjustments in our broadline distribution business; partially offset by increases in rates within our fuel surcharge program, which passes to our customers the increased fuel costs associated with distributing our products to customers.

        Our total operating expenses increased approximately 30.1%, or $125.3 million, to $541.4 million for the year ended August 2, 2008, from $416.1 million for the year ended July 28, 2007. The increase in total operating expenses for the year ended August 2, 2008 was primarily due to increases in infrastructure, fuel and other distribution expenses in our wholesale division to support our sales growth of approximately $31.2 million and a $60.1 million increase in operating expenses as a result of the DHI acquisition. We were able to partially offset the effect of rising fuel prices by increasing delivery sizes, improving route design and by opening new facilities which reduced the total distance traveled to customers. We also incurred higher operating expenses during the year ended August 2, 2008 related to our branded product lines, as we built our infrastructure to support anticipated new business, and $6.3 million in labor and start-up expenses related to our new distribution facilities in Sarasota, Florida, Ridgefield, Washington, Moreno Valley, California and York, Pennsylvania.

        Total operating expenses for the year ended July 28, 2007 included a loss of $1.5 million related to the sale of one of our Auburn, California facilities, $1.1 million of incremental and redundant costs incurred in connection with the start up of our Sarasota, Florida facility, $1.0 million of costs to transition our expanded relationship with Whole Foods Market in the Southern Pacific region of the United States to our facility located in Fontana, California, an impairment charge of $0.8 million related to the reclassification of the remaining Auburn, California facility to held-for-sale and $0.5 million of increased expense related to our fuel hedging program. The last of our fuel hedges then existing expired in June 2007 and we have not entered into any fuel hedges since fiscal 2007. Total operating expenses for fiscal 2008 included share-based compensation expense of $4.7 million, compared to $4.0 million in fiscal 2007. See Note 3 "Stock Option Plans" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        As a percentage of net sales, total operating expenses increased to approximately 16.1% for the year ended August 2, 2008, from approximately 15.1% for the year ended July 28, 2007. The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was primarily attributable to our acquisition of DHI,


Table of Contents


which has higher operating expenses due to the additional in store services provided to supermarket customers, $6.3 million in labor and start-up expenses related to our new distribution facilities in Sarasota, Florida, Ridgefield, Washington, Moreno Valley, California and York, Pennsylvania as well as operating inefficiencies related to the recent opening of the Sarasota, Florida and Ridgefield, Washington facilities, and our investment in infrastructure for our branded product lines. We expect that the opening of new facilities will contribute efficiencies and lead to lower operating expenses related to sales over the long-term. As noted above, however, we expect to continue to incur operating expenses higher than we historically have experienced as a result of UNFI Specialty's full service supermarket model.

        Operating income decreased approximately 1.1%, or $1.0 million, to $92.5 million for the year ended August 2, 2008, from $93.5 million for the year ended July 28, 2007. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 2.7% for the year ended August 2, 2008 compared to 3.4% for the year ended July 28, 2007.

        Other expense (income) increased $4.0 million to $15.3 million for the year ended August 2, 2008, from $11.3 million for the year ended July 28, 2007. Interest expense for the year ended August 2, 2008 increased to $16.1 million from $12.1 million in the year ended July 28, 2007. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increase in debt levels required to fund our acquisition of DHI and three branded product companies. Debt levels also increased for the year ended August 2, 2008 compared to the year ended July 28, 2007 as a result of UNFI Specialty's working capital needs and increased inventory levels in preparation for the opening of the Sarasota, Florida and Ridgefield, Washington facilities in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2008, respectively, and capital expenditures related to the opening of our Moreno Valley, California and York, Pennsylvania facilities. Interest income for the year ended August 2, 2008 decreased to $0.8 million from $1.0 million in the year ended July 28, 2007.

        Our effective income tax rate was 37.2% and 39.0% for the years ended August 2, 2008 and July 28, 2007, respectively. The decrease in the effective income tax rate for the year ended August 2, 2008 was primarily due to anticipated tax credits associated with the solar panel installation projects at our Rocklin, California and Dayville, Connecticut distribution facilities. This decrease was offset by an increase in our effective income tax rate due to the acquisition of DHI. Our effective income tax rate was also affected by share-based compensation for incentive stock options and the timing of disqualifying dispositions of certain share-based compensation awards. Certain incentive stock option expenses are not deductible for tax purposes until a disqualifying disposition occurs. A disqualifying disposition occurs when the option holder sells shares within one year of exercising an incentive stock option. We receive a tax benefit in the period that the disqualifying disposition occurs. Our effective income tax rate will continue to be effected by the tax impact related to incentive stock options and the timing of tax benefits related to disqualifying dispositions. For fiscal 2009 we expected our effective tax rate to be in the range of 39.5% to 40.0%.

        Net income decreased $1.7 million to $48.5 million, or $1.13 per diluted share, for the year ended August 2, 2008, compared to $50.2 million, or $1.17 per diluted share, for the year ended July 28, 2007.


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resourcesrevolving credit facility.

        We finance our day to day operations and growth primarily with cash flows from operations, borrowings under our credit facility, operating leases, trade payables and bank indebtedness. In addition, from time to time, we may issue equity and debt securities to finance our operations and growth.

        On April 30, 2004, we entered into anacquisitions. We believe that our cash on hand and available credit through our amended and restated four-year $250revolving credit facility as discussed below is sufficient for our operations and planned capital expenditures over the next twelve months. We expect to generate an average of $70 million to $100 million in cash flow from operations per year for the 2013 and 2014 fiscal years. We intend to continue to utilize this cash generated from operations to pay down our debt levels, and fund working capital and capital expenditure needs. We intend to manage capital expenditures to no more than approximately 1.3% of net sales for fiscal 2013.

        In May 2012, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility, pursuant to which we now have a $500 million revolving credit facility secured by, among other things, our accounts receivable, inventorywhich matures on May 24, 2017, of which up to $450.0 million is available to the Company's U.S. subsidiaries and general intangibles, with a bank group that was led by Bank of America Business Capital as the administrative agent. Theup to $50.0 million is available to UNFI Canada. This credit facility replaced an existing $150 million revolving credit facility. The terms and conditions of our amended and restated credit facility provided us with more financial and operational flexibility, reduced costs and increased liquidity than did our prior credit facility. We amended this facility effective as of January 1, 2006, reducing the rate at which interest accrues on LIBOR borrowings from one-month LIBOR plus 0.90% to one-month LIBOR plus 0.75%.

        On November 2, 2007, we amended our $250 million revolving credit facility to temporarily increase the maximum borrowing base under the credit facility from $250 million to $270 million. We used the funds available to us as a result of this amendment to fund a portion of the purchase price for our acquisition of DHI. On November 27, 2007, we amended our $270 million revolving credit facility to increase the maximum borrowing base under the credit facility from $270 million to $400 million. This amendment also provides the Company with a one-time option, subject to approval by the lenders under the revolving credit facility, to increase the borrowing base by up to an additional $50$100 million. Interest accrues onThe borrowings underof the US portion of the credit facility accrue interest, at our option, at either the(i) a base rate (the applicable(generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of America Business Capital prime lendingrate, (y) the average overnight federal funds effective rate plus one-half percent (0.50%) per annum and (z) one-month LIBOR plus one percent (1%) per annum plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) LIBOR for one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all affected lenders, nine months plus an initial margin of 1.50%. The borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility for Canadian swing-line loans, Canadian overadvance loans or Canadian protective advances accrue interest, at our option, at either (i) a prime rate (generally defined as the highest of (x)��0.50% over 30-day Reuters Canadian Deposit Offering Rate for bankers' acceptances, (y) the prime rate of Bank of America, Business Capital, as announced from time to time)N.A.'s Canada branch, and (z) a bankers' acceptance equivalent rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00% plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or at one-month LIBOR plus 0.75%(ii) the CDOR rate, and an initial margin of 1.50%. The $400 millionAll other borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility matures on November 27, 2012.must exclusively accrue interest under the CDOR rate plus the applicable margin. The revolving credit facility supports our working capital requirements in the ordinary course of business and provides capital to grow our business organically or through acquisitions. Our borrowing base is determined as the lesser of (1) $500 million or (2) the fixed percentages of our previous fiscal month-end eligible accounts receivable and inventory levels. As of August 1, 2009, the Company'sJuly 28, 2012, our borrowing base, which was calculated based on our eligible accounts receivable and inventory levels, was $483.7 million. As of July 28, 2012, we had $115.0 million outstanding borrowings under the amendedour credit facility, totaled $200.0$24.0 million with an availabilityin letter of $137.0 million.

        In April 2003, we executed a term loan agreementcredit commitments and $2.9 million in the principal amount of $30 million secured by the real property that was released from the lienreserves which reduces our available borrowing capacity under our former $150 million revolving credit facility in accordance with an amendment to the loan and security agreement related to that facility. The $30 million term loan is repayable over seven years based on a fifteen-year amortization schedule. Interest on the term loan accrued at one-month LIBOR plus 1.50%. In December 2003, we amended this term loan agreement by increasing the principal amount from $30 million to $40 million under the existing terms and conditions. On July 29, 2005, we entered into an amended term loan agreement which further increased the principal amount of this term loan from $40 million to up to $75 million and decreased the rate at which interest accrues to one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%. In connection with the amendments to our revolving credit facility described above, effective November 2, 2007 and November 27, 2007, we amended the term loan agreement to conform certain terms and conditions to the corresponding terms and conditions under our revolving credit facility. As of August 1, 2009, $56.9on a dollar for dollar basis. Our resulting remaining availability was $341.8 million was outstanding under the term loan agreement.

        On June 4, 2008, we further amended our revolving credit facility and our term loan agreement, effective as of MayJuly 28, 2008, in order to (i) waive events of default as a result of our noncompliance at April 26, 2008 with the fixed charge coverage ratio covenants under the revolving credit facility and our term loan agreement (the "Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenants"), (ii) increase the interest rate applicable to borrowings under each of our revolving credit facility and our term loan by 0.25% during the period from June 1, 2008 through the date on which we demonstrate compliance with the applicable Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant, and (iii) exclude non-cash share based compensation expense from the calculation of EBITDA (as defined in the applicable agreement) in connection with the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio under the revolving credit facility and


Table of Contents


the term loan agreement.2012. The revolving credit facility, and our term loan agreement, as amended requireand restated, subjects us to maintain a springing minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the underlying credit agreement) of 1.51.0 to 1.0 and 1.45 to 1.0, respectively, each calculated at the end of each of our fiscal quarters on a rolling four quarter basis.basis when aggregate availability (as defined in the underlying credit agreement) is less than the greater of (i) $35.0 million and (ii) 10% of the aggregate borrowing base. We were in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenantsnot subject to fixed charge coverage ratio covenants as of the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. The principal reason for our earlier noncompliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenants was the high level of capital expenditures we made in the trailing twelve month period ended April 26, 2008. In April 2009, we furtherJuly 28, 2012.

        Our amended ourand restated revolving credit facility includes borrowing rates that are approximately 50 to 100 basis points higher than our prior revolving credit facility, depending on remaining availability. However, we do not expect our overall interest expense to increase significantly if rates remain relatively stable as we have terminated our higher fixed rate interest rate swap, which covered our term loan.


Table of Contents

        In connection with the amended and restated revolving credit facility above, we used a portion of our availability to pay off our term loan agreement, effective aswhich was maturing on July 28, 2012. At that time, our interest rate swap entered into in July 2005 was settled concurrently with a payment of February 25, 2009, in order to update certain information as a result of our stock purchase acquisitions completed$0.3 million which is reflected within interest expense during the fiscal year 2009.ended July 28, 2012.

        Our capital expenditures for the 2012 fiscal year were $31.5 million, compared to $40.8 million for fiscal 2011. The decrease was partially due to a decision to delay certain construction related projects until fiscal 2013. We believe that our capital requirements for fiscal 20102013 will be between $35$70 and $39$80 million. We willexpect to finance these requirements with cash generated from operations and the use ofborrowings under our existingrevolving credit facilities.facility. Our planned capital projects will provide both expanded facilitiesadditional warehouse space (including through the build out of our new Aurora, Colorado facility) and technology that we believe will provide us with increased efficiency and the capacity to continue to support the growth and expansion of our business.customer base. We believe that our future capital requirements after fiscal 2013 will be marginally lower than our anticipated fiscal 20102013 requirements, as a percentage of net sales, although we plan to continue to invest in technology and expand our facilities. Future investments and acquisitions will be financed through eitherour revolving credit facility, or with the issuance of equity or long-term debt, negotiated at the time of the potential acquisition.

        Net cash provided by operations was $108.3$66.2 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, an increase of $99.2$16.4 million from the $9.1$49.8 million provided by operations for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. The primary reasons for the increase in cash flows from operations for the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 were net income of $91.3 million, partially offset by an increase in inventories of $62.8 million and an increase in accounts receivable of $51.2 million due to our sales growth during the year, and in the case of accounts receivable, in part due to the longer credit terms typically granted to conventional supermarket and Canadian customers. Net cash provided by operations of $66.1 million for the year ended July 31, 2010 was primarily the result of an increase in net income, and a decreasepartially offset by changes in inventories. The decrease in inventory levels is the result of the increased focus on our balance sheet in order to pay down our debt. Net cash provided by operations was $9.1 million for the year ended August 2, 2008, as the result of net income of $48.5 million, the $58.1 million investment in inventories, and the $8.3 million decrease in accounts payable.working capital. Days in inventory was 5250 days at August 1, 2009 and 53July 28, 2012, compared to 51 days at August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. Days sales outstanding worsened slightly to 21remained at 22 days at August 1, 2009, compared to 20 days at August 2, 2008.July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011. Working capital increased by $58.2$231.6 million, or 52.5%60.8%, to $169.1$612.7 million at August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, compared to working capital of $110.9$381.1 million at August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011, primarily as a result of the refinance of our revolving credit facility which is now reflected as a long-term liability.

        Net cash used in investing activities decreased $122.1$28.2 million to $36.8$34.5 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, compared to $158.9$62.7 million for the year ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011. The decrease from the fiscal year ended August 2, 2008July 30, 2011 was primarily due to the fiscal 2008 purchase of DHI includedthe Rocky Mountain and Southwest distribution business of Whole Foods Distribution, a wholly owned subsidiary of Whole Foods Market, during the year ended July 30, 2011. Net cash used in purchasesinvesting activities was $118.7 million for the year ended July 31, 2010, primarily as a result of acquired businesses, netthe purchase of cash.the SDG assets from SunOpta, as well as capital expenditures related to our Lancaster, Texas facility including the supply chain initiatives related to warehouse management software which went live with that facility.

        Net cash used in financing activities was $86.6$32.8 million for the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, primarily due to repayments on borrowingslong-term debt of $47.4 million as we paid off our term loan with availability under notes payable.our amended and restated revolving credit facility. Net cash provided by financing activities was $158.1$16.3 million for the year ended August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, primarily due to financing related tonet proceeds from our acquisitionsecondary equity offering of DHI,$138.3 million, partially offset by repayments on long-term debt.borrowings on notes payable of $127.6 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was $56.0 million for the year ended July 31, 2010, primarily due to borrowings under notes payable of $42.6 million.

        On December 1, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of common stock from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As part of the stock repurchase program, we purchased 228,800 shares of our common stock for our treasury during the year ended July 29, 2006 at an aggregate cost of approximately $6.1 million. All shares were


Table of Contents

purchased at prevailing market prices. No such purchases were made duringsubsequent to the years ended August 2, 2008 or July 28, 2007,2006 fiscal year, and the authorization to repurchase has expired.

In August 2005,an effort to reduce the treasury share balance, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement effectivedecided in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 to issue treasury shares to satisfy certain share requirements related to exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and awards under our equity incentive plans. During the fiscal year ended July 29, 2005. This interest rate swap agreement has an initial notional amount31, 2010, we reissued 201,814 shares from treasury related to stock option exercises and the vesting of $50 millionrestricted stock units and provides for usawards. During the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012, we reissued 26,986 shares from treasury related to pay interest at a fixed rate of 4.70% while receiving interest for the same period at one-month LIBOR on the same notional principal amount. The interest rate swap agreement has a seven year term with an amortizing notional amount which adjusts down on the dates payments are due on the underlying term loan. The swap has been entered into as a hedge against LIBOR movements on current variable rate


Table of Contents


indebtedness totaling $56.9 million at one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%, thereby fixing our effective rate on the notional amount at 5.70%. One-month LIBOR was 0.28% as of August 1, 2009. The swap agreement qualifies as an "effective" hedge under SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS 133").stock option exercises.

        We may from time to time enter into commodity swap agreements to reduce price risk associated with our anticipated purchases of diesel fuel. These commodity swap agreements hedge a portion of our expected fuel usage for the periods set forth in the agreements. We monitor the commodity (NYMEX #2 Heating oil) used in our swap agreements to determine that the correlation between the commodity and diesel fuel is deemed to be "highly effective." During the fiscal years ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, we had no outstanding commodity swap agreements.

        In addition to the previously discussed interest rate and commodity swap agreements, from time-to-time we enter into fixed price fuel supply agreements. As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, we had entered into agreements which requirerequired us to purchase a total of 200,000–242,000approximately 4.3 million gallons of diesel fuel per month at prices ranging from $2.20$3.33 to $2.84$3.91 per gallon. The terms of the agreements aregallon through July 2010. During fiscal 2008 and 20072013. As of July 30, 2011, we didhad not haveentered into any fixed price fuel supply agreements.agreements requiring us to purchase diesel fuel. These fixed price fuel agreements qualified for the "normal purchase" exception under SFAS 133,ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging as physical deliveries will occur rather than net settlements, therefore the fuel purchases under these contracts will be expensed as incurred and included within operating expenses.

Commitments and Contingencies

        The following schedule summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of August 1, 2009:July 28, 2012:

 
 Payments Due by Period 
 
 Total Less than
One Year
 1–3
Years
 3–5
Years
 Thereafter 

Inventory purchase commitments

 $27,679 $27,679       

Diesel fuel purchase commitments

  6,000  6,000       

Notes payable

  200,000     $200,000   

Long-term debt

  58,878  5,020 $52,872  720 $266 

Deferred compensation

  14,346  1,045  2,430  2,398  8,473 

Long-term non-capitalized leases

  205,630  34,503  58,038  41,671  71,418 
            

Total

 $512,533 $74,247 $113,340 $244,789 $80,157 
            

 
 Payments Due by Period 
 
 Total Less than
One Year
 1–3
Years
 3–5
Years
 Thereafter 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Inventory purchase commitments

 $24,040 $24,040       

Diesel fuel purchase commitments

  15,608  15,608          

Notes payable

  115,000     $115,000   

Long-term debt

  985  350 $635     

Deferred compensation

  12,768  1,149  2,579  2,444 $6,596 

Long-term non-capitalized leases

  311,043  45,640  78,569  63,926  122,908 
            

Total

 $479,444 $86,787 $81,783 $181,370 $129,504 
            

        The notes payable, long-term debt and long-term non-capitalized lease obligations shown above exclude interest payments due. The notes payable obligations shown reflect the expiration of the credit facility, not necessarily the underlying individual borrowings. In addition, cash to be paid for income taxes is excluded from the table above.

        We had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $17.4$24.0 million at August 1, 2009.

        Assets mortgaged amounted to approximately $102.0 million at August 1, 2009.July 28, 2012.

Seasonality

        Generally, we do not experience any material seasonality. However, our sales and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to factors such as changes in our operating expenses,


Table of Contents

management's ability to execute our operating and growth strategies, personnel changes, demand for natural products, supply shortages and general economic conditions.


Table of Contents

Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

        In September 2006,May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB"("FASB") issued SFAS No. 157,Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04,Fair Value MeasurementsMeasurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("SFAS 157"ASU 2011-04"). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishesASU 2011-04 provides a framework for measuringconsistent definition of fair value and requires enhanced disclosures aboutseeks to ensure that fair value measurements underand disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This guidance changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are applied prospectively. Our adoption of ASU 2011-04 effective April 28, 2012 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2011-05"). ASU 2011-05 increases the prominence of other accounting pronouncements, but doescomprehensive income in financial statements and provides an entity the option to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. In December 2011 the FASB issued ASU 2011-12,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), whereby the effective date of those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments in the income statement are deferred to provide the FASB with more time to consider whether to present the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements for all periods presented. We intend to adopt ASU 2011-05 effective July 29, 2012, which impacts only the presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011-08"). ASU 2011-08 modifies the impairment test for goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles so that it is no longer required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the company believes, based on qualitative factors, it is more likely than not changethat the existing guidance as to whetherreporting unit's or not an instrumentindefinite lived intangible asset's fair value is carried at fairless than the carrying value. The statementASU 2011-08 is effective for fiscal years beginningthat begin after NovemberDecember 15, 2007.2011, with early adoption allowed. We have adopted ASU 2011-08 effective July 30, 2011, seeValuation of goodwill and intangible assets for further information.

        In February 2008,September 2011, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2,ASU 2011-09,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Multiemployer Plans (Topic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer's Participation in a Multiemployer Plan ("FSP 157-2"ASU 2011-09"), which delays. ASU 2011-09 requires additional disclosures about employers' participation in multiemployer pension plans including information about the plan's funded status if it is readily available. The ASU is effective date of SFAS 157 by one yearretrospectively for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3,Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Marketperiods for That Asset is Not Active ("FSP 157-3"), which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and illustrates how an entity would determine fair value when the market for a financial asset is not active. In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly ("FSP 157-4"), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 was effective for interim and annual reporting periodsfiscal years ending after JuneDecember 15, 2009, and is to be applied prospectively.2011 for public entities, with early adoption permitted. We adopted SFAS 157 and FSP 157-3ASU 2011-09 effective August 3, 2008, and we adopted FSP 157-4 effective August 1, 2009. These adoptionsJuly 28, 2012, which did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. In accordance with FSP 157-2, we have delayed the implementation of the provisions of SFAS 157 related to the fair value of goodwill, other intangible assets, and non-financial long-lived assets until our fiscal year beginning August 2, 2009. We do not expect the full adoption of SFAS 157 in accordance with FSP 157-2 to have a material effect on the disclosures that accompany our consolidated financial statements.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value, and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As of May 2, 2009, we have not elected to adopt the fair value option under SFAS 159 for any financial instruments or other items.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)"), which is a revision of SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) continues to require the purchase method of accounting for business combinations and the identification and recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill. SFAS 141(R) requires, among other things, the buyer to: (1) fair value assets and liabilities acquired as of the acquisition date (i.e., a "fair value" model rather than a "cost allocation" model); (2) expense acquisition-related costs; (3) recognize assets or liabilities assumed arising from contractual contingencies at the acquisition date using acquisition-date fair values; (4) recognize goodwill as the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest over the acquisition-date fair value of net assets acquired; (5) recognize at acquisition any contingent consideration using acquisition-date fair values (i.e., fair value earn-outs in the initial accounting for the acquisition); and (6) eliminate the recognition of liabilities for restructuring costs expected to be incurred as a result of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) also defines a "bargain" purchase as a business combination where the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the


Table of Contents


consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest. Under this circumstance, the buyer is required to recognize such excess (formerly referred to as "negative goodwill") in earnings as a gain. In addition, if the buyer determines that some or all of its previously booked deferred tax valuation allowance is no longer needed as a result of the business combination, SFAS 141(R) requires that the reduction or elimination of the valuation allowance be accounted as a reduction of income tax expense. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We will apply SFAS 141(R) to any acquisitions that are made on or after August 2, 2009.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS 160"). This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an Amendment of SFAS No. 133 ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material effect on the disclosures that accompany our consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets ("FSP 142-3"). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R). FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of FSP 142-3 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2008, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires that all earnings per share data presented for prior periods be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of the Staff Position. Early adoption is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2009, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position 107-1 and Accounting Principals Board 28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments ("FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1"). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," (SFAS 107) to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. Prior to FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only


Table of Contents


disclosed annually. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 applies to all financial instruments within the scope of SFAS 107 and requires all entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 to have a material effect on the disclosures that accompany our interim consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events ("SFAS 165"). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through we have evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 165 effective August 1, 2009. See note 1(t) to the consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

        We are exposed to interest rate fluctuations on our borrowings. As more fully described in Note 8 "Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments"Measurements" to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we usehave used interest rate swap agreements to modify variable rate obligations to fixed rate obligations.

        At August 1, 2009,During the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012, we were a party to onean interest rate swap agreement which relates to our $75 million term loan agreement and which we entered into during Augustin July 2005 (the "2005 swap"), which was set to expire in July 2012 concurrent with the maturity of our term loan. The 2005 swap was terminated in connection with our repayment of all borrowings under the term loan during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. The 2005 swap had an initial notional principal amount of $50 million and provided for us to pay interest for a seven-year period at a fixed rate of 4.70% while receiving interest for the same period at one-month LIBOR on the same notional principal amount. The 2005 swap had an amortizing notional amount which adjusted down on the dates payments were due on the underlying term loan. The 2005 swap had been entered into as a hedge against LIBOR movements on current variable rate indebtedness at one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%, thereby fixing our effective rate on the notional amount at 5.70%. We accountaccounted for the 2005 swap using hedge accounting treatment because the derivative has been determined to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair valuecash flows of the hedged items. The 2005 swap requires us to pay interest for a seven-year period at a fixed rate of 4.70% on an initial amortizing notional principal amount of $50 million, while receiving interest for the same period at one-month LIBOR on the same amortizing notional principal amount. The 2005 swap has been entered into as a hedge against LIBOR movements on current variable rate indebtedness totaling $56.9 million at LIBOR plus 1.00%, thereby fixing our effective rate on the notional amount at 5.70%.item. Under this method of accounting, at August 1, 2009, we had recorded a liability of $2.7$1.3 million representing the fair value of the 2005 swap.swap as of July 30, 2011. There was no liability recorded as of July 28, 2012 due to the settlement of the swap in conjunction with the payoff of the underlying term loan in May 2012. We do not enter into derivative agreements for trading purposes.

        At August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, we had long-term floating rate debt under our amended and restated revolving credit facility of $115.0 million and long-term fixed rate debt of $1.0 million, representing 99% and 1%, respectively, of our long-term borrowings. At July 30, 2011, we had long-term floating rate debt of $56.9$47.1 million and long-term fixed rate debt of $2.0$1.3 million, representing approximately 97% and 3%, respectively, of our long-term debt. At August 2, 2008, we had long-term floating rate debt of $61.2 million and long-term fixed rate debt of $2.3 million, representing 96% and 4%, respectively, of our long-term debt.borrowings. Holding other swap terms and debt levels constant, a 25 basis point decrease in interest rates would change the unrealized fair market value of the fixed rate debt by approximately $14,000$3,000 and $19,000$6,000 at August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, respectively.


Table of Contents

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

        The financial statements listed below are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

United Natural Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
 Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 4250

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
4452

Consolidated Statements of Income

 
4553

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

 
4654

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
4755

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
4856

Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
United Natural Foods, Inc.:Inc:

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Natural Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended August 1, 2009.July 28, 2012. We also have audited the Company'sUnited Natural Foods, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company'sUnited Natural Foods, Inc.'s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Table of Contents

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyUnited Natural Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of America.accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Providence, Rhode Island
September 29, 200926, 2012


Table of Contents



UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 
 
 (In thousands, except per
share data)

 

ASSETS

       

Current assets:

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $10,269 $25,333 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $6,984 and $5,535, respectively

  179,455  179,063 

Notes receivable, trade, net of allowance of $380 and $130, respectively

  1,799  1,412 

Inventories

  366,611  394,364 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  16,423  13,307 

Deferred income taxes

  18,074  14,221 
      

Total current assets

  592,631  627,700 

Property & equipment, net

  
242,051
  
234,115
 

Goodwill

  
164,333
  
170,609
 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $3,806 and $1,671, respectively

  38,358  33,689 

Notes receivable, trade, net of allowance of $1,512 and $1,423, respectively

  2,176  2,349 

Other

  19,001  16,021 
      

Total assets

 $1,058,550 $1,084,483 
      

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

       

Current liabilities:

       

Notes payable

 $200,000 $288,050 

Accounts payable

  155,211  160,418 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  63,347  63,308 

Current portion of long-term debt

  5,020  5,027 
      

Total current liabilities

  423,578  516,803 

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

  
53,858
  
58,485
 

Deferred income taxes

  12,297  9,058 

Other long-term liabilities

  24,345  20,087 
      

Total liabilities

  514,078  604,433 
      

Commitments and contingencies

       

Stockholders' equity:

       

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 5,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

     

Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 100,000 shares; 43,237 issued and 43,008 outstanding shares at August 1, 2009; 43,100 issued and 42,871 outstanding shares at August 2, 2008

  432  431 

Additional paid-in capital

  175,182  169,238 

Treasury stock

  (6,092) (6,092)

Unallocated shares of Employee Stock Ownership Plan

  (877) (1,040)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (1,623) (753)

Retained earnings

  377,450  318,266 
      

Total stockholders' equity

  544,472  480,050 
      

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $1,058,550 $1,084,483 
      

 
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 

ASSETS

       

Current assets:

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $16,122 $16,867 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $6,249 and $4,545, respectively

  305,177  257,116 

Inventories

  578,555  514,506 

Deferred income taxes

  25,353  22,023 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  21,654  33,980 
      

Total current assets

  946,861  844,492 

Property & equipment, net

  278,455  285,151 

Goodwill

  193,741  191,943 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $10,809 and $8,143, respectively

  52,496  58,336 

Other long-term assets

  22,393  21,066 
      

Total assets

 $1,493,946 $1,400,988 
      

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

       

Current liabilities:

       

Accounts payable

 $242,179 $217,074 

Notes payable

    115,000 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  91,632  83,900 

Current portion of long-term debt

  350  47,447 
      

Total current liabilities

  334,161  463,421 

Notes payable

  115,000   

Deferred income taxes

  36,260  38,551 

Other long-term liabilities

  29,174  28,363 

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

  635  986 
      

Total liabilities

  515,230  531,321 
      

Commitments and contingencies

       

Stockholders' equity:

       

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 5,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

     

Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 100,000 shares; 49,011 issued and outstanding shares at July 28, 2012; 48,520 issued and 48,493 outstanding shares at July 30, 2011

  490  485 

Additional paid-in capital

  364,598  345,036 

Treasury stock

    (708)

Unallocated shares of Employee Stock Ownership Plan

  (89) (542)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  1,896  4,862 

Retained earnings

  611,821  520,534 
      

Total stockholders' equity

  978,716  869,667 
      

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $1,493,946 $1,400,988 
      

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 
 Fiscal year ended 
 
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 July 28,
2007
 
 
 (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Net sales

 $3,454,900 $3,365,857 $2,754,280 

Cost of sales (Note 1)

  2,794,419  2,731,965  2,244,702 
        
  

Gross profit

  660,481  633,892  509,578 
        

Operating expenses

  
550,560
  
541,413
  
415,337
 

Impairment on assets held for sale

      756 
        
  

Total operating expenses

  550,560  541,413  416,093 
        
  

Operating income

  
109,921
  
92,479
  
93,485
 
        

Other expense (income):

          
 

Interest expense

  9,914  16,133  12,089 
 

Interest income

  (450) (768) (975)
 

Other, net

  275  (82) 156 
        
  

Total other expense

  9,739  15,283  11,270 
        

Income before income taxes

  
100,182
  
77,196
  
82,215
 
 

Provision for income taxes

  40,998  28,717  32,062 
        

Net income

 $59,184 $48,479 $50,153 
        

Basic per share data:

          

Net income

 $1.38 $1.14 $1.18 
        

Weighted average basic shares of common stock

  42,849  42,690  42,445 
        

Diluted per share data:

          

Net income

 $1.38 $1.13 $1.17 
        

Weighted average diluted shares of common stock

  42,993  42,855  42,786 
        

Seeaccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYINCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

 
 Common Stock Treasury Stock  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid in
Capital
 Unallocated
Shares of
ESOP
 Retained
Earnings
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 
 
 Shares Amount Shares Amount 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Balances at July 29, 2006

  42,477 $425  229 $(6,092)$149,840 $(1,380)$1,047 $219,634 $363,474 
                    

Allocation of shares to ESOP

                 177        177 

Issuance of common stock and restricted stock, net

  574  6        7,121           7,127 

Share-based compensation

              3,994           3,994 

Tax benefit associated with stock plans

              2,518           2,518 

Fair value of swap agreements, net of tax

                    (648)    (648)

Net income

                       50,153  50,153 
                          

Total comprehensive income

                          49,505 
                    

Balances at July 28, 2007

  43,051  431  229  (6,092) 163,473  (1,203) 399  269,787  426,795 
                    

Allocation of shares to ESOP

                 163        163 

Issuance of common stock and restricted stock, net

  49          920           920 

Share-based compensation

              4,674           4,674 

Tax benefit associated with stock plans

              171           171 

Fair value of swap agreement, net of tax

                    (1,152)    (1,152)

Net income

                       48,479  48,479 
                          

Total comprehensive income

                          47,327 
                    

Balances at August 2, 2008

  43,100  431  229  (6,092) 169,238  (1,040) (753) 318,266  480,050 

Allocation of shares to ESOP

                 163        163 

Issuance of common stock and restricted stock, net

  137  1        1,038           1,039 

Share-based compensation

              5,504           5,504 

Tax expense associated with stock plans

              (598)          (598)

Fair value of swap agreement, net of tax

                    (870)    (870)

Net income

                       59,184  59,184 
                          

Total comprehensive income

                          58,314 
                    

Balances at August 1, 2009

  43,237 $432  229 $(6,092)$175,182 $(877)$(1,623)$377,450 $544,472 
                    

 
 Fiscal year ended 
 
 July 28, 2012 July 30, 2011 July 31, 2010 

Net sales

 $5,236,021 $4,530,015 $3,757,139 

Cost of sales

  4,320,018  3,705,205  3,060,208 
        

Gross profit

  916,003  824,810  696,931 
        

Operating expenses

  
755,744
  
688,859
  
582,029
 

Restructuring and asset impairment expenses

  5,101  6,270   
        

Total operating expenses

  760,845  695,129  582,029 
        

Operating income

  
155,158
  
129,681
  
114,902
 
        

Other expense (income):

          

Interest expense

  4,734  5,000  5,845 

Interest income

  (715) (1,226) (247)

Other, net

  356  (528) (2,698)
        

Total other expense

  4,375  3,246  2,900 
        

Income before income taxes

  
150,783
  
126,435
  
112,002
 

Provision for income taxes

  59,441  49,762  43,681 
        

Net income

 $91,342 $76,673 $68,321 
        

Basic per share data:

          

Net income

 $1.87 $1.62 $1.58 
        

Weighted average basic shares of common stock

  48,766  47,459  43,184 
        

Diluted per share data:

          

Net income

 $1.86 $1.60 $1.57 
        

Weighted average diluted shares of common stock

  49,100  47,815  43,425 
        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 
 Year Ended 
 
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 July 28,
2007
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

          

Net income

 $59,184 $48,479 $50,153 
 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activites:

          
  

Depreciation and amortization

  27,029  22,544  18,376 
  

Loss on disposals of property and equipment

  262  158  1,997 
  

Impairment on assets held for sale

      756 
  

Deferred income tax expense

  239  2,257  1,707 
  

Provision for doubtful accounts

  4,759  2,707  1,528 
  

Share-based compensation

  5,504  4,674  3,994 
  

Gain on forgiveness of loan

    (157)  
 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired companies:

          
  

Accounts receivable

  (3,950) (8,339) (10,216)
  

Inventories

  30,398  (58,112) (52,975)
  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  (2,729) (6,434) (5,772)
  

Notes receivable, trade

  (652) 713  (469)
  

Accounts payable

  (13,836) (8,319) 27,739 
  

Accrued expenses

  2,115  8,958  (1,308)
        
 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  108,323  9,129  35,510 
        

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

          
 

Capital expenditures

  (32,353) (51,083) (46,804)
 

Purchases of acquired businesses, net of cash acquired

  (4,495) (107,812) (9,303)
 

Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment

  98    5,452 
 

Other investing activities

      (1,010)
        
 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (36,750) (158,895) (51,665)
        

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

          
 

Net (repayments) borrowings under notes payable

  (88,050) 168,050  (5,005)
 

Proceeds from borrowing of long-term debt

      10,000 
 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  1,038  920  7,127 
 

Repayments of long-term debt

  (4,634) (8,332) (6,216)
 

Tax benefit from equity awards

  234  171  2,518 
 

Increase (decrease) in bank overdraft

  8,494  (1,435) 4,691 
 

Principal payments of capital lease obligations

      (4)
 

Payments on life insurance policy loans

  (3,072)    
 

Capitalized debt issuance costs

  (647) (1,285)  
        
 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

  (86,637) 158,089  13,111 
        

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  (15,064) 8,323  (3,044)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  25,333  17,010  20,054 
        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $10,269 $25,333 $17,010 
        

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

          
 

Cash paid during the period for:

          
 

Interest, net of amounts capitalized

 $9,094 $16,469 $11,877 
        
 

Federal and state income taxes, net of refunds

 $43,978 $27,618 $28,607 
        

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:

          
  

Fair value of assets acquired

 $ $ $8,498 
  

Cash paid for assets

      (5,498)
        
  

Liabilities incurred (see Note 2)

 $ $ $3,000 
        

 
 Common Stock Treasury Stock  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid in
Capital
 Unallocated
Shares of
ESOP
 Retained
Earnings
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 
(In thousands)
 Shares Amount Shares Amount 

Balances at August 1, 2009

  43,237  432  229  (6,092) 175,182  (877) (1,623) 377,450  544,472 
                    

Allocation of shares to ESOP

                 164        164 

Stock option exercises and restricted stock vestings, net

  321  3  (202) 5,384  3,666        (1,910) 7,143 

Share-based compensation

              8,057           8,057 

Tax benefit associated with stock plans

              1,822           1,822 

Fair value of swap agreement, net of tax

                    128     128 

Foreign currency translation

                    340     340 

Net income

                       68,321  68,321 
                          

Total comprehensive income

                          68,789 
                    

Balances at July 31, 2010

  43,558 $435  27 $(708)$188,727 $(713)$(1,155)$443,861 $630,447 
                    

Allocation of shares to ESOP

                 171        171 

Issuance of common stock pursuant to secondary offering, net of direct offering costs

  4,428  44        138,257           138,301 

Stock option exercises and restricted stock vestings, net

  534  6        7,348           7,354 

Share-based compensation

              9,159           9,159 

Tax benefit associated with stock plans

              1,545           1,545 

Fair value of swap agreements, net of tax

                    732     732 

Foreign currency translation

                    5,285     5,285 

Net income

                       76,673  76,673 
                          

Total comprehensive income

                          82,690 
                    

Balances at July 30, 2011

  48,520 $485  27 $(708)$345,036 $(542)$4,862 $520,534 $869,667 
                    

Allocation of shares to ESOP

                 453        453 

Stock option exercises and restricted stock vestings, net

  491  5  (27) 708  5,386        (55) 6,044 

Share-based compensation

              11,372           11,372 

Tax benefit associated with stock plans

              2,804           2,804 

Fair value of swap agreements, net of tax

                    763     763 

Foreign currency translation

                    (3,729)    (3,729)

Net income

                       91,342  91,342 
                          

Total comprehensive income

                          88,376 
                    

Balances at July 28, 2012

  49,011 $490   $ $364,598 $(89)$1,896 $611,821 $978,716 
                    

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
 Years Ended 
(In thousands)
 July 28, 2012 July 30, 2011 July 31, 2010 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

          

Net income

 $91,342 $76,673 $68,321 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activites:

          

Depreciation and amortization

  39,560  35,296  27,483 

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

  (6,115) 15,520  5,061 

Share-based compensation

  11,372  9,159  8,057 

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

  (2,804) (1,545) (1,822)

(Gain) loss on disposals of property and equipment

  (313) (42) 229 

Impairment on long-term assets

    5,790   

Impairment on indefinite lived intangibles

    200   

Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange

  (468) 318  (61)

Realized gain on hedge related to Canadian acquisition

      (2,814)

Provision for doubtful accounts

  3,532  635  1,149 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired companies:

          

Accounts receivable

  (51,193) (39,791) (21,599)

Inventories

  (62,822) (66,283) (55,803)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  15,050  (12,283) (3,284)

Accounts payable

  16,095  9,583  32,491 

Accrued expenses

  13,008  16,614  8,724 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  66,244  49,844  66,132 
        

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

          

Capital expenditures

  (31,492) (40,778) (55,109)

Purchases of acquired businesses, net of cash acquired

  (3,297) (22,061) (66,556)

Cash proceeds from hedge related to Canadian acquisition

      2,814 

Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment

  332  96  180 
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (34,457) (62,743) (118,671)
        

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

          

Net proceeds from common stock issuance

    138,301   

Net (repayments) borrowings under notes payable

    (127,570) 42,570 

Repayments of long-term debt

  (47,447) (5,033) (5,412)

Increase in bank overdraft

  8,673  1,739  9,982 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  7,571  10,162  8,481 

Payment of employee restricted stock tax withholdings

  (1,526) (2,808) (1,338)

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

  2,804  1,545  1,822 

Capitalized debt issuance costs

  (2,905)   (68)
        

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (32,830) 16,336  56,037 
        

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  298  (372) 35 
        

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  (745) 3,065  3,533 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  16,867  13,802  10,269 
        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $16,122 $16,867 $13,802 
        

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

          

Cash paid during the period for:

          

Interest, net of amounts capitalized

 $4,734 $4,752 $4,465 
        

Federal and state income taxes, net of refunds

 $52,666 $42,018 $35,538 
        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        United Natural Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") is a leading national distributor and retailer of natural, organic and specialty products. The Company sells its products primarily throughout the United States.States and Canada.

        The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.

        The fiscal year of the Company ends on the Saturday closest to July 31. As such, fiscal 2009, 2008,Fiscal 2012, 2011 and fiscal 20072010 ended on August 1, 2009, August 2, 2008July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011, and July 28, 2007,31, 2010, respectively. Fiscal 2008 was a 53 week year,Each of these fiscal years contained 52 weeks, and fiscal 2009 and 2007 were 52 week years. Oureach of the Company's interim quarters consistconsisted of 13 weeks, except for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, which consisted of 14 weeks.

        Net sales consistconsists primarily of sales of natural, organic and specialty products to retailers, adjusted for customer volume discounts, returns and allowances. Net sales also includes amounts charged by the Company to customers for shipping and handling, and fuel surcharges. The principal components of cost of sales include the amount paid to manufacturers and growers for product sold, plus the cost of transportation necessary to bring the product to the Company's distribution facilities.centers. Cost of sales also includes amounts incurred by the Company's manufacturing subsidiary, United Natural Trading Co., which does business as Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, for inbound transportation costs and depreciation for manufacturing equipment andoffset by consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase or promotion of the suppliers' products. Operating expenses include salaries and wages, employee benefits (including payments under the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan), warehousing and delivery, selling, occupancy, insurance, administrative, share-based compensation and amortization expense. Operating expenses also includesinclude depreciation expense related to the wholesale and retail divisions. Other expense (income) includeincludes interest on outstanding indebtedness, interest income and miscellaneous income and expenses. In fiscal 2010, other expense (income) includes the gain recorded by the Company upon settlement of a forward contract entered into by the Company to swap United States dollars for Canadian dollars.

        Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

        Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Allowances received from suppliers are recorded as reductions in cost of sales upon the sale of the related products.

        Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment under capital leases is stated at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease or the fair value of the asset. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis, over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, when applicable, the life of the lease, whichever is shorter. Applicable interest charges incurred during


Table of Contents


the construction of new facilities ismay be capitalized as one of the elements of cost and is amortized over


Table of Contents

the assets' estimated useful lives. There was no interest capitalized during the year ended July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011. Interest capitalized for each of the yearsyear ended August 1, 2009, August 2, 2008 and July 28, 200731, 2010 was $0.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively.less than $0.1 million.

        Property and equipment consisted of the following at August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008:July 30, 2011:

 
 Original
Estimated
Useful Lives
(Years)
 2009 2008 
 
 (In thousands, except years)
 

Land

    $14,920 $14,910 

Buildings and improvements

  20-40  160,947  160,317 

Leasehold improvements

  5-20  53,820  22,681 

Warehouse equipment

  3-30  83,000  72,153 

Office equipment

  3-10  50,831  47,436 

Motor vehicles

  3-7  4,668  4,773 

Construction in progress

     10,356  27,807 
         

     378,542  350,077 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     136,491  115,962 
         
 

Net property and equipment

    $242,051 $234,115 
         

 
 Original
Estimated
Useful Lives
(Years)
 2012 2011 
 
 (In thousands, except years)
 

Land

    $13,311 $13,241 

Buildings and improvements

  20-40  160,940  158,790 

Leasehold improvements

  5-20  85,648  77,605 

Warehouse equipment

  3-30  104,310  88,643 

Office equipment

  3-10  68,674  58,643 

Computer software

  3-7  50,998  40,986 

Motor vehicles

  3-7  4,562  4,182 

Construction in progress

     12,072  15,428 
         

     500,515  457,518 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     222,060  172,367 
         

Net property and equipment

    $278,455 $285,151 
         

        Depreciation expense amounted to $35.2 million, $31.1 million and $25.0 million for the fiscal years ended July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

        The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

        In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48 and in subsequent periods. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on July 29, 2007 and there was no material effect on the consolidated financial statements. As a result, the Company did not record any cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of FIN 48. The Company's policy to includeincludes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense did not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48.expense.

        Management reviews long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets are estimated over the assets' useful lives based on updated projections. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow model.


Table of Contents

        Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the following lives:

Customer relationships

 5-8 years

Non-compete agreements

2-47-10 years

Trademarks and tradenames

 5-274-10 years

        Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. The recoverabilityCompany is required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce


Table of Contents

the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. During the first quarter of the 2011 fiscal year, the Company performed a test for goodwill impairment as a result of the expected change in future cash flows for certain of its branded product lines, and determined that no impairment existed. The Company has elected to perform its annual tests for indications of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assetsimpairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.

        In accordance with ASU 2011-08, the Company is assessed annually, orallowed to perform a qualitative assessment unless it believes it is more frequently as needed when events or changes have occurredlikely than not that would suggest an impairment ofa reporting unit's fair value is less than the carrying value. GoodwillThe thresholds used by the Company for this determination in fiscal 2012 were for any reporting units that (1) have passed their previous two-step test with a margin of calculated fair value versus carrying value of at least 10%, (2) have had no significant changes to their working capital structure, and (3) have current year income streams which are at least 85% of prior year amounts. The Company's wholesale distribution reporting unit and its Earth Origins Market reporting unit met this threshold. As each reporting unit's net income has not decreased more than 15% and their working capital intensity has not increased significantly, no quantitative testing is assessedrequired. For the remaining reporting units, the Company tests for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level based on future expected cash flows. The Company's reporting units are at or one level below the operating segment level. Approximately 91% of the Company's goodwill is within its wholesale reporting unit. For those reporting units that did not meet the threshold above, or that had significant changes to their cash flow profiles, the Company has performed a two-step goodwill impairment analysis. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, involves comparing each reporting unit's estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. Each reporting unit regularly prepares discrete operating forecasts and uses these forecasts as the basis for the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment. If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated potential impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by determining whethermeasuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the applicableindividual assets, liabilities and identifiable. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting units exceed theirunit, there is no impairment. If the carrying values. Forvalue of goodwill assigned to a reporting units that indicate potential impairment, the goodwill impairment is measured based onunit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit and related residual goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill, exceeds the implied value, an impairment charge is recorded.recorded for the excess.

        Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment at least annually and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the value of the asset may be impaired. Impairment of other indefinite lived intangible assets is measured as the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value. The evaluation of fair value requires the use of projections, estimates and assumptions as to the future performance of the operations in performing a discounted cash flow analysis, as well as assumptions regarding sales and earnings multiples that would be applied in comparable acquisitions. As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, the Company's annual assessment of goodwill for each of its reporting units and its indefinite lived intangible assets indicated that no impairment existed.


Table of Contents

        The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and the amount allocated by reportable segment for the years presented are as follows (in thousands):

 
 Wholesale Other Total 

Goodwill as of July 28, 2007

  64,032  15,871  79,903 

Goodwill arising from business combinations

  90,088  618  90,706 

Goodwill as of August 2, 2008

  154,120  16,489  170,609 

Goodwill adjustment for final DHI valuation

  (7,150) 0  (7,150)

Goodwill arising from business combinations

  0  874  874 
        

Goodwill as of August 1, 2009

 $146,970 $17,363 $164,333 
        

 
 Wholesale Other Total 

Goodwill as of July 31, 2010

 $169,594 $17,331 $186,925 

Goodwill adjustment for restructuring activities, net of tax of $179

  (726)   (726)

Goodwill adjustment for prior year business combinations

  1,210    1,210 

Goodwill arising from fiscal 2011 business combinations

  2,743    2,743 

Change in foreign exchange rates

  1,791    1,791 
        

Goodwill as of July 30, 2011

 $174,612 $17,331 $191,943 

Goodwill adjustment for prior year business combinations

  2,857  200  3,057 

Change in foreign exchange rates

  (1,259)   (1,259)
        

Goodwill as of July 28, 2012

 $176,210 $17,531 $193,741 
        

        The following table presents detailsthe detail of the Company's other intangible assets (in thousands):

 
 August 1, 2009 August 2, 2008 
 
 Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 

Amortized intangible assets:

                   

Customer relationships

 $10,730 $2,347 $8,383 $5,070 $760 $4,310 

Non-compete agreements

  1,780  1,332  448  2,132  863  1,269 

Trademarks and tradenames

  2,233  127  2,106  2,233  48  2,185 
              

Total amortized intangible assets

  14,743  3,806  10,937  9,435  1,671  7,764 

Unamortized intangible assets:

                   

Trademarks and tradenames

  27,421    27,421  25,925    25,925 
              

Total

 $42,164 $3,806 $38,358 $35,360 $1,671 $33,689 
              


 
 July 28, 2012 July 30, 2011 
 
 Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 

Amortizing intangible assets:

                   

Customer relationships

 $32,120 $10,286 $21,834 $35,390 $7,856 $27,534 

Trademarks and tradenames

  3,030  523  2,507  2,233  287  1,946 
              

Total amortizing intangible assets

  35,150  10,809  24,341  37,623  8,143  29,480 

Indefinite lived intangible assets:

                   

Trademarks and tradenames

  28,155    28,155  28,856    28,856 
              

Total

 $63,305 $10,809 $52,496 $66,479 $8,143 $58,336 
              

Table of Contents

        Amortization expense was $2.4$4.3 million, $1.5$3.5 million and $0.1$1.9 million for the years ended August 1, 2009, August 2, 2008,July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and July 28, 2007,31, 2010, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense for the next five fiscal years on finite lived intangible assets outstandingexisting as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 is shown below:

Fiscal Year:
 (In thousands) 

2010

 $1,784 

2011

  1,505 

2012

  1,421 

2013

  1,421 

2014

  1,421 
    

 $7,552 
    

Fiscal Year:
 (In thousands) 

2013

 $4,022 

2014

  3,909 

2015

  3,909 

2016

  2,688 

2017

  2,102 

2018 and thereafter

  7,711 
    

 $24,341 
    

        The Company records revenue upon delivery of products. Revenues are recorded net of applicable sales discounts and estimated sales returns. Sales incentives provided to customers are accounted for as reductions in revenue as the related revenue is recorded. The Company's sales are primarily withto customers located throughout the United States.States and Canada.


Table of Contents

        Whole Foods Market Inc. ("Whole Foods Market") was the Company's largest customer in each fiscal 2009.year presented. Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets, Inc. ("Wild Oats Markets") were the Company's largest two customers in fiscal 2008 and 2007. In August 2007, Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets completed their previously-announced merger, as a result of which, Wild Oats Markets became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Whole Foods Market. Whole Foods Market sold all thirty-five of Wild Oats Markets' Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations to a subsidiary of Smart & Final Inc. on September 30, 2007. On a combined basis and excluding sales to Henry's and Sun Harvest store locations, Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Markets accounted for approximately 33.1%36%, 31.0%36%, and 34.7%35% of ourthe Company's net sales for the years ended August 1, 2009, August 2, 2008July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and July 28, 2007, respectively.31, 2010. There were no other customers that individually generated 10% or more of the Company's net sales.

        The Company analyzes customer creditworthiness, accounts receivable balances, payment history, payment terms and historical bad debt levels when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. In instances where a reserve has been recorded for a particular customer, future sales to the customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely monitored so that as agreed upon payments are received, orders are released; a failure to pay results in held or cancelled orders.

        The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

        The carryingfollowing estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Refer to footnote (8),Fair Value Measurements, for additional information regarding the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of notes receivablepayable and long-term debt are based on the instruments' interest rate, terms, maturity date and collateral, if any, in comparison to the Company's incremental borrowing rate for similar financial instruments.

        The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates


Table of Contents


presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

 
 August 1, 2009 August 2, 2008 
 
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

 $10,269 $10,269 $25,333 $25,333 

Accounts receivable

  179,455  179,455  179,063  179,063 

Notes receivable

  3,975  3,975  3,761  3,761 

Liabilities:

             

Notes payable

  200,000  200,000  288,050  288,050 

Long term debt, including current portion

  58,878  59,015  63,512  63,765 

Swap agreements:

             
 

Interest rate swap

  (2,717) (2,717) (1,199) (1,199)

 
 July 28, 2012 July 30, 2011 
 
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

 $16,122 $16,122 $16,867 $16,867 

Accounts receivable

  305,177  305,177  257,116  257,116 

Notes receivable

  3,703  3,703  2,826  2,826 

Liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

  242,179  242,179  217,074  217,074 

Notes payable

  115,000  115,000  115,000  115,000 

Long-term debt, including current portion

  985  988  48,433  48,424 

Swap agreements:

             

Interest rate swap

      (1,259) (1,259)

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported therein. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be based on amounts that differ from those estimates.

        The Company issues trade notes receivable to certain customers under two basic circumstances; inventory purchases for initial store openings and overdue accounts receivable. Notes issued in connection with store openings are generally receivable over a period not to exceed twelve months. Notes issued in connection with overdue accounts receivable may extend for periods greater than one year. All notes are issued at a market interest rate and contain certain guarantees and collateral assignments in favor of the Company.


Table of Contents

        The Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123 (revised 2004),ASC 718,Share-Based PaymentStock Compensation ("SFAS 123(R)"ASC 718"), effective August 1, 2005. SFAS 123(R)ASC 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation in net income. The Company has three share-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 3. Share-based compensation consists of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units. Stock options are granted to employees and directors at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company's stock at the dates of grant. Generally, stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees vest ratably over four years from the grant date. The performance units granteddate and grants to its Board of Directors vest ratably over two years with one third vesting immediately. Beginning in fiscal 2008, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer vest at the end of fiscal 2010has been granted performance shares and performance units which have vested in accordance with the terms of Mr. Spinner'sthe related Performance Share and Performance Unit agreement.agreements. During fiscal 2012, the Company granted performance-based stock units to its executive officers that will vest if the Company achieves certain performance metrics as of and for the year ended August 3, 2013. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.

        SFAS 123(R)ASC 718 also requires that compensation expense be recognized for only thatthe portion of stock basedshare-based awards that are expected to vest. Therefore, we apply estimated forfeiture rates that are derived from historical employee and director termination activity to reduce the amount of compensation expense recognized. If the actual forfeitures differ from the estimate, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.


Table of Contents

        The Company receives an income tax deduction for grants of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units when they vest and for non-qualified stock options exercised by employees equal to the excess of the fair market value of ourits common stock on the vesting or exercise date of exercise over the optionexercised price. Excess tax benefits (tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized) are classifiedpresented as a cash flowinflow provided by financing activities in the accompanying Consolidated Statementconsolidated statement of Cash Flows in accordance with SFAS 123(R).cash flows.

        Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adding the dilutive potential common shares to the weighted average number of common shares that were outstanding during the period. For purposes of the diluted earnings per share calculation, outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units and performance-based awards, if applicable, are considered common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented follows:

 
 Years ended 
 
 August 1, 2009 August 2, 2008 July 28, 2007 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

  42,849  42,690  42,445 

Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents based upon the treasury stock method

  144  165  341 
        

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  42,993  42,855  42,786 
        

Potential anti-dilutive common shares excluded from the computation above

  1,436  1,052  441 
        

 
 Fiscal years ended 
 
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 July 31,
2010
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

  48,766  47,459  43,184 

Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents based upon the treasury stock method

  334  356  241 
        

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  49,100  47,815  43,425 
        

Potential anti-dilutive share-based payment awards excluded from the computation above

  88  99  791 
        

Table of Contents

        Comprehensive income (loss) is reported in accordance with SFAS No. 130,ASC 200,Reporting Comprehensive Income, and includes net income and the change in other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive lossincome (loss) is comprised of the net change in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.hedges, as well as foreign currency translation related to the translation of UNFI Canada from the functional currency of Canadian dollars to U.S. dollar reporting currency. For all periods presented, we displaythe Company displays comprehensive income (loss) and its components as part of the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity.

        The Company is exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates, fuel costs, and fuel costs.with the creation and operation of UNFI Canada, foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses derivatives principally in the management of interest rate and fuel price exposure. However, during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, the Company entered into a forward contract to exchange United States dollars for Canadian dollars in anticipation of the Canadian dollars needed to fund the acquisition of the Canadian food distribution assets of SunOpta, Inc. The Company does not utilize derivatives that contain leverage features. OnFor derivative transactions accounted for as hedges, on the date on which the Company enters into athe derivative transaction, the derivativeexposure is designated as a hedge of the identified exposure.identified. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In this documentation, the Company specifically identifies the asset, liability, firm commitment, forecasted transaction, or net investment that has been designated as the hedged item and states how the hedging instrument is expected to reduce the risks related to the hedged item. The Company measures effectiveness of its hedging relationships both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis as needed.


Table As of ContentsJuly 28, 2012, the Company was not a party to any derivative financial instruments.

        The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in net sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight are generally recorded in cost of sales, whereas shipping and handling costs for selecting, quality assurance, and outbound freighttransportation are recorded in operating expenses. Outbound shipping and handling costs, which exclude employee benefit expenses which are not allocated, totaled $295.5 million, $266.7 million and $222.0 million for the fiscal years ended July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

        The Company is primarily self-insured for workers' compensation, and general and automobile liability insurance. It is the Company's policy to record the self-insured portion of workers' compensation and automobile liabilities based upon actuarial methods to estimate the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not yet reported. Any projection of losses concerning workers' compensation and automobile liability is subject to a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns.

        The Company records lease paymentsexpense via the straight-line method and, formethod. For leases with step rent provisions whereby the rental payments increase over the life of the lease, and for leases where the Company receives rent-free periods, the Company recognizes expense based on a straight-line basis based on the total minimum lease payments on a straight-line basisto be made over the expected lease term.

        The Company evaluated events occurring between the end of its most recent fiscal year and September 30, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.

        In September 2006,May 2011, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements under other accounting pronouncements, but does not change the existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2,Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 ("FSP 157-2") which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 by one year for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3,Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active ("FSP 157-3"), which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and illustrates how an entity would determine fair value when the market for a financial asset is not active. In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly ("FSP 157-4"), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157-4 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and isMeasurement (Topic 820): Amendments to be applied prospectively. The Company adopted SFAS 157 and FSP 157-3 effective August 3, 2008, and adopted FSP 157-4 effective August 1, 2009. These adoptions did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. In accordance with FSP 157-2, the Company has delayed the implementation of the provisions of SFAS 157 related to the fair value of goodwill, other intangible assets, and non-financial long-lived assets until its 2010 fiscal year. The Company does not expect the full adoption of SFAS 157 in accordance with FSP 157-2 will have a material effect on the disclosures that accompany its consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 5 for further discussion regarding the adoption of SFAS 157.Achieve Common Fair


Table of Contents

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option forMeasurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesReporting Standards ("SFAS 159"("ASU 2011-04"). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured atASU 2011-04 provides a consistent definition of fair value and establishes presentationseeks to ensure that fair value measurements and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisonsare similar between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assetsU.S. GAAP and liabilities. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which theIFRS. This guidance changes certain fair value option has been electedmeasurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The amendments in this ASU are reported in earnings. The statement is effective for interim and annual fiscal yearsperiods beginning after November 15, 2007. As of May 2, 2009, the Company has not elected to adopt the fair value option under SFAS 159 for any financial instruments or other items.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations ("SFAS 141(R)"), which is a revision of SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) continues to require the purchase method of accounting for business combinations and the identification and recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill. SFAS 141(R) requires, among other things, the buyer to: (1) account for the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired as of the acquisition date (i.e., a "fair value" model rather than a "cost allocation" model); (2) expense acquisition-related costs; (3) recognize assets or liabilities assumed arising from contractual contingencies at the acquisition date using acquisition-date fair values; (4) recognize goodwill as the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest over the acquisition-date fair value of net assets acquired; (5) recognize at acquisition any contingent consideration using acquisition-date fair values (i.e., fair value earn-outs in the initial accounting for the acquisition); and (6) eliminate the recognition of liabilities for restructuring costs expected to be incurred as a result of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) also defines a "bargain" purchase as a business combination where the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest. Under this circumstance, the buyer is required to recognize such excess (formerly referred to as "negative goodwill") in earnings as a gain. In addition, if the buyer determines that some or all of its previously booked deferred tax valuation allowance is no longer needed as a result of the business combination, SFAS 141(R) requires that the reduction or elimination of the valuation allowance be accounted as a reduction of income tax expense. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008.2011 and are applied prospectively. The Company will apply SFAS 141(R) to any acquisitions that are made on or after August 2, 2009.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 ("SFAS 160"). This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect theCompany's adoption of SFAS 160 toASU 2011-04 effective April 28, 2012 did not have a material effectimpact on itsthe Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In March 2008,June 2011, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,ASU 2011-05,Disclosures about Derivative InstrumentsComprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2011-05"). ASU 2011-05 increases the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements and Hedging Activities-an Amendment of SFAS No. 133 ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures regarding how: (a)provides an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instrumentsthe option to present the components of net income and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133; and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity'scomprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2008 and2011, with early adoption permitted. In December 2011 the FASB issued ASU 2011-12,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), whereby the effective date of those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments in the income statement are deferred to provide the FASB with more time to consider whether to present the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements for all periods presented. The Company intends to adopt ASU 2011-05 effective July 29, 2012, which impacts only the presentation of the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011-08"). ASU 2011-08 modifies the impairment test for goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles so that it is no longer required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless it believes it is more likely than not that the reporting unit's fair value is less than the carrying value. ASU 2011-08 is effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of SFAS 161Company adopted ASU 2011-08 effective July 30, 2011, which did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-09,Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Multiemployer Plans (Topic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer's Participation in a Multiemployer Plan ("ASU 2011-09"). ASU 2011-09 requires additional disclosures that accompany itsabout employers' participation in multiemployer pension plans including information about the plan's funded status if it is readily available. The ASU is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011 for public entities, with early adoption permitted. An entity is required to apply the ASU retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company adopted ASU 2011-09 effective July 28, 2012, which did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents

        In April 2008, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets ("FSP 142-3"). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R). FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP 142-3 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2008, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires that all earnings per share data presented for prior periods be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of the Staff Position. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2009, the FASB staff issued FASB Staff Position 107-1 and Accounting Principals Board 28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments ("FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1"). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments ("SFAS 107"), to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. Prior to FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed annually. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 applies to all financial instruments within the scope of SFAS 107 and requires all entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 will have a material effect on the disclosures that accompany its interim consolidated financial statements.

        In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events ("SFAS 165"). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through we have evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS effective August 1, 2009. See note 1(t) to the consolidated financial statements.

(2)   ACQUISITIONS

        On November 2, 2007,        Canadian expansion.    During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, UNFI Canada, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of a private specialty food distribution business located in Ontario, Canada. Total cash consideration paid in connection with this acquisition was $3.0 million. In addition, the asset purchase agreement provides for potential earn-outs of up to $1.95 million from November 2011 through November 2014. This acquisition was financed through borrowings under the Company's then existing revolving credit facility. The fair value assigned to an identifiable intangible asset acquired was determined by using an income approach. The identifiable intangible asset recorded based on the provisional valuation includes a customer list of $0.8 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of approximately 9.7 years. Significant assumptions utilized in the income approach were based on company-specific information and projections, which are not observable in the market and are considered Level 3 measurements as defined by authoritative guidance. The Company is still completing the final valuation of the acquired intangible and therefore the Company's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period. Acquisition costs related to this purchase are insignificant, and have been expensed as incurred and are included within "Operating Expenses" in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Net sales resulting from the acquisition have been included in the Company's results since November 15, 2011, however, neither these sales nor the increase in total assets related to this acquisition were significant compared to the Company's consolidated amounts.

        Whole Foods Distribution.    During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company finalized its valuation of the customer relationship intangible asset related to the first quarter fiscal 2011 acquisition of the Rocky Mountain and Southwest distribution business of Whole Foods Market Distribution, Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Millbrook Distribution Services, Inc. (DHI)("Whole Foods Distribution"), a distributorwholly owned subsidiary of specialty food items (including ethnic, kosher, gourmet, organicWhole Foods Market, Inc., whereby the Company (i) acquired inventory at Whole Foods Distribution's Aurora, Colorado and natural foods), healthAustin, Texas distribution centers; (ii) acquired substantially all of Whole Foods Distribution's assets, other than the inventory, at the Aurora, Colorado distribution center; (iii) assumed Whole Foods Distribution's obligations under the existing lease agreement related to the Aurora, Colorado distribution center; and beauty care items(iv) hired substantially all of Whole Foods Distribution's employees working at the Aurora, Colorado distribution center. Incremental net sales resulting from the transaction totaled approximately $25.4 million and other non-food items from distribution centers located in Massachusetts, New Jersey,$131.6 million for the years ended July 28, 2012 and Arkansas, to customers throughout the United States.July 30, 2011, respectively. The Company believes thatdoes not record the expenses for this business separately from the rest of its broadline distribution business, and therefore it is impracticable for the Company to provide complete financial results for this business.

        The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the acquisition and the amounts of DHI accomplishes certain strategic objectives, including acceleratingassets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the expansion into a number of historically high-growth business channels and establishing immediate market share in the fast-growing specialty foods market.acquisition date:

 
 (In thousands) 

Inventory

 $6,911 

Property & equipment

  1,500 

Customer relationships and other intangible assets

  7,900 

Goodwill

  5,600 
    

Total assets

 $21,911 

Liabilities

   
    

Cash consideration paid

 $21,911 
    

Table of Contents

The Company also believes that the acquisition of DHI provides valuable strategic opportunities enabling        SunOpta Distribution Group.    On June 11, 2010, the Company to further leverageacquired the Canadian food distribution assets of the SunOpta Distribution Group business ("SDG") of SunOpta, through its existing and future relationships in the supermarket business channel and that DHI's complementary product lines present opportunities for cross-selling which will further grow the Company's wholesale distribution business. These factors contributed to the purchase price that resulted in goodwill, as further noted below. Of the total amount of goodwill recorded, approximately $9.3 million is deductible for tax purposes.

wholly-owned subsidiary, UNFI Canada. Total cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was $85.5 million, comprised of $84.0 million of purchase price and $1.5 million of related transaction fees incurred, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the merger agreement. Prior to the acquisition and during the three months ended October 27, 2007, the Company entered into a note receivable from DHI in the amount of $5.0 million, which was assumed by the Company as part of the purchase price.$65.8 million. This acquisition was financed through borrowings under the Company's then existing revolving credit facility, whichfacility.

        The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the acquisition and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date:

 
 (In thousands) 

Total current assets

 $34,604 

Property & equipment

  7,512 

Customer relationships and other intangible assets

  12,443 

Goodwill

  24,603 
    

Total assets

 $79,162 

Liabilities

  13,385 
    

Cash consideration paid

 $65,777 
    

        The translation of the consideration paid and the asset allocations above from the functional currency of Canadian dollars to US dollars were performed utilizing the June 11, 2010 spot rate of $0.9673. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was amended in November 2007 to increasedetermined primarily by using an income approach. Identifiable intangible assets include customer relationships of $11.6 million and the Company's maximum borrowing base thereunder. See Note 6 forAux Milles tradename of approximately $0.8 million. The customer relationships intangible asset is being amortized on a descriptionstraight-line basis over an estimated useful life of these amendments.

10.1 years. During the year ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, the tradename was converted from indefinite lived to being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 10 years as the Company completed the final purchase price allocation forhas changed its acquisition of DHI with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm's independent appraisalexpectations regarding future use of the fair valuetradename. Significant assumptions utilized in the income approach were based on company-specific information and projections, which are not observable in the market and are therefore considered Level 3 measurements as defined by authoritative guidance. With this acquisition, the Company became the largest distributor of certain assets acquired. As a resultnatural, organic and specialty foods, including kosher foods, in Canada with an immediate platform for further growth in the Canadian market. The goodwill of $24.6 million represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including expansion of the final purchase price allocation, duringCompany's sales into the year ended August 1, 2009,Canadian market and expanded vendor relationships. Of the total amount of goodwill decreased byrecorded, approximately $7.2$19.0 million primarily due to an adjustment of $5.6 millionis deductible for tax purposes.

        Acquisition costs related to the valuationestablishment of certain intangibles, as well as adjustments to certain deferred tax assets and liabilities. The following table presents the final allocation of fair values of assets and liabilities recorded in connection with the DHI acquisition:

 
 (In thousands) 

Total current assets

 $42,727 

Property & equipment

  12,516 

Customer relationships and other intangible assets

  11,610 

Goodwill

  82,938 

Other assets

  3,524 
    

  153,315 

Liabilities

  67,797 
    

Cash consideration paid

 $85,518 
    

        The Company has undertaken certain restructuring activities at DHI. These activities, which include reductions in staffingUNFI Canada and the eliminationsubsequent purchase of a facility,SDG were accountedapproximately $1.0 million during fiscal 2010, and were expensed as incurred and are included within "Operating Expenses" in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Net sales for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 95-3, "RecognitionUNFI Canada, excluding the net sales resulting from the Canadian acquisition during fiscal 2012, totaled $233.5 million and $200.7 million for the years ended July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011, respectively. Total assets of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination". The costUNFI Canada were approximately $94.7 million and $93.8 million as of these actions was charged to the cost of the acquisitionJuly 28, 2012 and a corresponding liability of $7.6 million was included in other long-term liabilities.July 30, 2011, respectively.

        DuringThe Company recorded an increase of $0.1 million to its intangible assets during the yearyears ended August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012 and July 30, 2011 in recognition of ongoing contingent consideration payments in the Company acquired substantially allform of royalties ranging between 2-4% of net sales (as defined in the applicable purchase agreement) related to two of its acquisitions of assets and liabilities of three branded product companies which the Company includesduring fiscal 2009. The acquisition of assets of a third branded product company during fiscal 2009 requires ongoing contingent consideration payments in the "other" category. See Note 14 "Business Segments" forform of earn-outs over a descriptionperiod of five years from the Company's reportable segment and the "other" category. The total cash consideration paid for these product lines was approximately $4.5 million, including approximately $0.5 millionacquisition date of holdbacks currently held in escrow. Approximately $0.9 million in goodwill was recorded in connection with the acquisitions. The cash paid was financed by borrowings under the Company's existing revolving credit facility.

        During the year ended August 2, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of three branded product companies and one retail store outside of the wholesale segment.


Table of Contents


The total cash consideration paidNovember 2008. These earn-outs are based on tiers of net sales for these branded product companiesthe trailing twelve months, and this retail store was approximately $22.2 million, in addition to approximately $1.1 million of holdbacks recorded in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. No goodwill was recorded in connection with the branded product company acquisitions. Goodwill of $0.6$0.2 million was recorded in connection with the retail store acquisition. Other intangible assets in the amount of $20.5 million were acquiredpaid during the year ended August 2, 2008, which included $19.9 million in trademarks and tradenames and $0.6 million in non-compete agreements. The cash paid was financed by borrowings under the Company's existing revolving credit facility.

        On April 2, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of Organic Brands, LLC ("Organic Brands") for cash consideration of approximately $5.5 million and notes payable totaling $3.0 million. The cash portion of the purchase price was financed by borrowings against the Company's line of credit. The operating results of Organic Brands have been included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company beginning with the acquisition date. The acquisition resulted in goodwill of $1.8 million, all of which is deductible for tax purposes. Such goodwill was assigned to the Company's manufacturing division. Other intangible assets acquired were $5.0 million.

        During the year ended July 28, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets related to additional product lines outside of the wholesale segment. The total cash consideration paid for these product lines was approximately $3.8 million in addition to approximately $0.2 million of holdbacks recorded in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. The cash paid was financed by borrowings against the Company's line of credit. The consolidated financial statements of the Company have included operating results of each of these product lines since the respective acquisition dates. Resulting goodwill of $0.1 million is deductible for tax purposes. Other intangible assets acquired were $3.4 million.2012.

        Results of operations of the acquired companies have been included in the Company's consolidated statements of income since the respective dates of acquisition. The following table presents the Company's unaudited pro forma results of operations assuming that the acquisitions made during fiscal 2008 had occurred as of the beginning of fiscal 2007 (in thousands). The following pro forma results do not include any cost savings that may result from the combination of the acquired companies and the Company.

 
 Year Ended 
 
 August 2,
2008
 July 28,
2007
 

Net Sales

 $3,438,903 $3,098,821 

Income before Income taxes

  68,070  74,085 

Net Income

  42,748  45,302 

Earnings per common share

       
 

Basic

 $1.00 $1.06 
 

Diluted

 $1.00 $1.06 

(3)   STOCK OPTIONEQUITY PLANS

        Effective August 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized subsequent to fiscal 2005 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted through August 1, 2005, but for which the requisite service period had not been completed as of August 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted


Table of Contents


subsequent to August 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).

        The Company recognized total share-based compensation expense of $5.5$11.4 million or $0.08 per diluted share, for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. The Company recognizedJuly 28, 2012, compared to share-based compensation expense of $4.7$9.2 million or $0.07 per diluted share,and $8.1 million for the yearfiscal years ended August 2, 2008.July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $4.0related to performance-based share awards, including the two-year long-term incentive plan created during fiscal 2012, was $2.1 million, or $0.06 per diluted share,$0.7 million and $1.0 million for the yearfiscal years ended July 28, 2007.2012, July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

        As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, there was $11.8$14.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding share-based compensation arrangements (including stock optionoptions, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted share awards)shares and units). This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.52.6 years.

        For stock options, the fair value of each grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield and expected life. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock price. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The model incorporates exercise and post-vesting forfeiture assumptions based on an analysis of historical data. The expected term is derived from historical information and other factors. The fair value of restricted stock andawards, restricted stock units, isand performance share units are determined based on the number of shares or units, as applicable, granted and the quoted price of the Company's common stock as of the grant date.

        The following summary presents the weighted average assumptions used for stock options granted in fiscal 2009, 20082012, 2011 and 2007:2010:

 
 Year ended 
 
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 July 28,
2007
 

Expected volatility

  39.0% 32.7% 34.6%

Dividend yield

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Risk free interest rate

  2.1% 3.1% 4.5%

Expected term (in years)

  3.0  3.0  3.0 

 
 Year ended 
 
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 July 31,
2010
 

Expected volatility

  39.3% 44.7% 45.2%

Dividend yield

  0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Risk free interest rate

  0.4% 0.9% 1.4%

Expected term (in years)

  3.0  3.0  3.0 

        AsThe Company has three equity incentive plans that provided for the issuance of August 1, 2009,stock options: the Company had two stock option plans:1996 Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Plan"), the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002 Plan"), and effective with an amendment approved by the 1996 Stock OptionCompany's stockholders during the 2010 Annual Meeting, the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Plan") (collectively, the "Plans"). The Plans provide for grants of stock options to employees, officers, directors and others. TheseStock options granted are intended to either qualify as incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or be "non-statutory stock options." Beginning with the Company's fiscal 2010 grants, non-qualified stock options are being granted in place of incentive stock options to decrease the variability in income taxes due to the timing of tax benefits from disqualifying dispositions. Vesting requirements for awards under the Plans are at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors, or Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and are typicallyDirectors. Typically options granted to employees vest ratably over four years, while options granted to non-employee directors vest one third immediately with gradedthe remainder vesting for employees andratably over two years with graded vesting for non-employee directors.years. The maximum term of all incentive stock options granted under the Plans and non-statutory stock options granted under the 2002 Stock IncentivePlan and the 2004 Plan, is ten years. The maximum term for non-statutory stock options granted under the 1996 Stock Option Plan iswas at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors, and all grants to date have had a term of


Table of Contents

ten years. There were 7,800,000 shares authorized for grant under the Plans.1996 Plan and 2002 Plan. There were 1,054,267 remaining shares authorized for grant under the 2004 Plan as of December 16, 2010, the effective date when the 2004 Plan was amended to allow for the award of stock options. These shares may be used to issue stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance based awards. As of August 1, 2009, 257,829July 28, 2012, 49,047 and 655,574 shares were available for grant under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. ThePlan and 2004 Plan, respectively, and the authorization for new grants under the 1996 Plan has expired. During fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2012, the Company has a policy ofissued shares from treasury in addition to issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.


Table of Contentsexercises and restricted stock vestings.

        The following summary presents the weighted-average remaining contractual term of options outstanding at August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 by range of exercise prices.

Exercise Price Range
 Number of
Shares
Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Number of
Shares
Exercisable
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

$11.00 - $18.00

  156,922 $12.42  3.1  154,922 $12.41 

$18.01 - $24.00

  190,575 $18.70  4.4  189,575 $18.68 

$24.01 - $30.00

  698,190 $26.64  7.0  408,003 $27.39 

$30.01 - $37.00

  249,690 $36.21  7.1  137,340 $36.06 
               

  1,295,377 $25.59  6.2  889,840 $24.27 
               

Exercise Price Range
 Number of
Options
Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Number of
Shares
Exercisable
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

$12.00 - $24.00

  8,050 $16.56  2.7  7,300 $16.59 

$24.01 - $32.00

  196,464 $25.64  5.6  115,959 $26.33 

$32.01 - $40.00

  231,138 $36.21  7.6  87,006 $36.06 

$40.01 - $48.00

  5,180 $44.47  9.2  1,516 $44.80 
               

  440,832 $31.24  6.6  211,781 $30.12 
               

        The following summary presents information regarding outstanding stock options as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and changes during the fiscal year then ended with regard to options under the Plans:

 
 Number
of Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

  1,297,190 $25.22      

Granted

  212,750 $24.53      

Exercised

  (106,563)$14.77      

Forfeited

  (45,000)$30.53      

Cancelled

  (63,000)$29.08      
            

Outstanding at end of year

  1,295,377 $25.59 6.2 years $33,154,000 
          

Exercisable at end of year

  889,840 $24.27 5.2 years $21,592,000 
          

 
 Number
of Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

  664,048 $28.40      

Granted

  93,800 $38.07      

Exercised

  (277,977)$27.24      

Forfeited

  (35,289)$27.83      

Cancelled

  (3,750)$28.16      
            

Outstanding at end of year

  440,832 $31.24 6.6 years $10,306,862 
          

Exercisable at end of year

  211,781 $30.12 5.0 years $5,188,171 
          

        The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended August 1, 2009, August 2, 2008,July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011, and July 28, 200731, 2010 was $7.05, $7.34$10.27, $10.64 and $10.48,$7.73, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years ended August 1, 2009, August 2, 2008,July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011, and July 28, 2007,31, 2010, was $1.2$5.2 million, $0.5$3.9 million and $7.7$4.6 million, respectively.

        At August 1, 2009, the Company also had the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Plan"). The 2004 Plan aswas amended during fiscal 2009 providesto provide for the issuance of up to 2,500,000 equity-based compensation awards, other thanand during fiscal 2011 was further amended to provide for the issuance of stock options such asin addition to restricted shares and units, performance shares and units, bonus shares and stock appreciation rights. Vesting requirements for restricted share and unitthe awards under the 2004 Plan are at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee thereof, and are typically four years with graded vestingequal annual installments for employees and two yearsthree equal annual installments with gradedone third vesting immediately for non-employee directors. The performance units granted to the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer vest at the endupon hire during fiscal 2009 vested as of fiscalJuly 31, 2010, those granted during March 2011 vested as of July 30, 2011 and those granted during September 2011 vested


Table of Contents

as of July 28, 2012, each in accordance with the terms of Mr. Spinner'sthe related Performance Unit agreement.and Performance Share agreements. At August 1, 2009, 1,681,845July 28, 2012, a total of 655,574 shares were available for grant under the 2004 Plan.


Table of Contents

        The following summary presents information regarding restricted sharestock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares and unit awardsperformance units under the 2004 Plan as of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and changes during the fiscal year then ended with regard to restricted share and unit awards under the 2004 Plan:ended:

 
 Number
of Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Outstanding at August 2, 2008

  329,871 $29.94 

Granted

  359,205 $24.34 

Vested

  (128,799)$29.78 

Forfeited

  (45,991)$28.36 
      

Outstanding at August 1, 2009

  514,286 $26.35 
      

 
 Number
of Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Outstanding at July 30, 2011

  702,143 $29.57 

Granted

  484,361 $38.42 

Vested

  (303,465)$30.19 

Forfeited

  (139,048)$32.14 
      

Outstanding at July 28, 2012

  743,991 $34.59 
      

        The total intrinsic value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units vested was $14.2 million, $9.1 million and $6.2 million during the fiscal years ended July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The total intrinsic value of performance share awards and performance units vested was $1.7 million, $0.7 million and $1.0 million during the fiscal years ended July 28, 2012, July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

        During the year ended July 28, 2012, 25,000 performance shares and 12,500 performance units were granted (in each case subject to the issuance of an additional 25,000 shares and 12,500 units if the Company's performance exceeded specified targeted levels) to the Company's President and CEO, the vesting of which was contingent on the attainment of specific levels of earnings before interest and taxes and return on invested capital. The per share grant-date fair value of restrictedthese grants was $37.82. Effective July 28, 2012, an additional 6,610 units were granted and a total of 44,110 performance shares and units vested duringwith a corresponding intrinsic value and fair value of $1.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

        During the year ended August 1, 2009July 28, 2012, the Company created a new performance-based equity compensation arrangement with a 2-year performance-based vesting component that was $2.4 million. The totalestablished for members of the Company's executive leadership team. Under this arrangement, the executives are eligible for performance-based stock units equal to a grant-date fair value of restricted sharesapproximately 33% of the sum of 125% of their annual base salary and 50% of their cash-based performance award for fiscal 2012. Similar to the performance awards granted to the Company's President and CEO, if the Company's performance exceeds specified targeted levels, the grants may be increased up to an additional 100%. These performance-based stock units vested duringvest at the end of fiscal 2013 if the Company's performance as measured by its return on invested capital and increases in its stock price relative to a selected group of distributors meets or exceeds targeted levels.

        During the year ended August 2, 2008July 30, 2011, 25,000 performance shares and 12,500 performance units were granted (in each case subject to the issuance of an additional 25,000 shares and 12,500 units if the Company's performance exceeded specified targeted levels) to the Company's President and CEO, the vesting of which was $2.6contingent on the attainment of specific levels of earnings before interest and taxes and return on invested capital. The per share grant-date fair value of these grants was $42.03. Effective July 30, 2011, 18,924 performance shares vested with a corresponding intrinsic value and fair value of $0.8 million. The remainder of the performance shares were forfeited, and no shares were issued for the performance units.

        During the year ended July 31, 2010, 175 units, in addition to the 50,000 units granted during fiscal 2009, were granted to the Company's President and CEO in connection with the related Performance Unit Agreement awarded on November 5, 2008. The grant-date fair value of these grants was $19.99. Effective July 31, 2010, 50,175 units vested, with a corresponding intrinsic value and fair value of $1.0 million and $1.7 million respectively.


Table of Contents

(4)   ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE

        Accounts and notes receivableThe allowance for doubtful accounts consistand notes receivable consists of the following:

 
 Year ended
August 1, 2009
 Year ended
August 2, 2008
 Year ended
July 28, 2007
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Balance at beginning of year

 $7,088 $5,981 $8,433 

Additions charged to costs and expenses

  4,759  2,707  1,528 

Deductions

  (2,971) (2,765) (3,980)

Charged to Other Accounts(a)

    1,165   
        

Balance at end of year

 $8,876 $7,088 $5,981 
        

 
 Fiscal year
ended
July 28, 2012
 Fiscal year
ended
July 30, 2011
 Fiscal year
ended
July 31, 2010
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Balance at beginning of year

 $5,854 $7,692 $8,876 

Additions charged to costs and expenses

  3,532  635  1,149 

Deductions

  (2,430) (2,473) (3,399)

Charged to Other Accounts(a)

  0  0  1,066 
        

Balance at end of year

 $6,956 $5,854 $7,692 
        

(a)
Relates to acquisitionsacquisitions.

        The Company analyzes the details of specific transactions, overall customer creditworthiness, current accounts receivable aging, payment history, and any available industry information when determining whether to charge off an account. In instances where a balance has been charged off, future sales to the customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely monitored so that as agreed-upon payments are received, orders are released; a failure to pay results in held or cancelled orders.

(5)   ASSETS HELD FOR SALERESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

        In November 2005,June 2011, the Company transitioned all remainingentered into an asset purchase agreement with L&R Distributors, Inc. ("L&R Distributors"), a leading national distributor of non-food products and general merchandise, to divest the Company's conventional non-foods and general merchandise lines of business. The Company entered the conventional non-foods and general merchandise businesses, which includes cosmetics, seasonal products, conventional health & beauty products and hard goods, as part of its acquisition of Distribution Holdings, Inc. in November 2007. This strategic transaction will allow the Company to concentrate on its core business of the distribution of natural, organic, and specialty foods and products.

        In connection with this divestiture, the Company planned to cease operations at one of its two Auburn, California facilities to a new facility in Rocklin, California. As a result, the Company reclassified $7.4 million of long-lived assets related to the Auburn facility that were previously included in propertyHarrison, Arkansas distribution center and equipment as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet. In June 2006, the Company sold a portion of these long-lived assets for less than $0.1 million, resulting in a loss of $0.5 million, which was recorded in operating expenses induring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. In January 2007,2011, the Company sold the remainingrecognized a non-cash impairment charge on long-lived assets for $5.4including land, building and equipment of $5.8 million. In addition, the Company incurred $0.5 million resulting in a loss of $1.5 million, which was recorded in operating expenses induring the secondfourth quarter of fiscal 2007.

        In2011 to transition the year ended July 28, 2007,specialty food line of business into the Company transitioned its remaining Auburn, California operations to its Rocklin, California facility, determined to sellCompany's other distribution centers. Upon the second Auburn, California facility and related assets and recorded an impairment lossclosure of $0.8 million with respect to that facility. The impairment loss was recognized based on management's estimatethe Harrison, Arkansas distribution center during the first quarter of fairfiscal 2012, the carrying value of the facility, less costs of disposal. As a result, the Company$2.6 million in long-term property and equipment was reclassified to assets held for sale, $5.9sale. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recognized $5.1 million of long-lived assets, netin severance and other expenses related to the completion of the $0.8 million impairment loss, that were previously included in propertydivestiture. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the land, buildings and equipment in accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. During the year ended August 2, 2008, the Company decided not to sell the second Auburn, California facility and related assets duewas sold to a need for additional warehouse spacethird party, resulting in northern California. This


Table of Contents


resulted in the recording of catch up depreciation of $0.2 million during the year ended August 2, 2008 and the reclassification of $5.9 million of assets held for sale to property and equipment, net.a nominal gain.

(6)   NOTES PAYABLE

        On April 30, 2004,In May 2012, the Company entered into an amended and restated four-year $250 millionits revolving credit facility, pursuant to which the Company has a $500 million secured by, among other things,revolving credit facility which now matures on May 24, 2017, of which up to $450.0 million is available to the Company's accounts receivable, inventoryU.S. subsidiaries and general intangibles, with a bank group that was led by Bank of America Business Capital as the administrative agent (the "amended credit facility"). The amendedup to $50.0 million is available to UNFI Canada. This credit facility increased the amount available for borrowing from $150 million to $250 million. On November 2, 2007, the Company amended the amended credit facility to temporarily increase the maximum borrowing base from $250 million to $270 million. On November 27, 2007, the Company again amended the amended credit facility to increase the maximum borrowing base under the credit facility from $270 million to $400 million. The November 27, 2007 amendment also provided the Company withprovides a one-time option, subject to approval by the lenders under the revolving credit facility, to increase the borrowing base by up to an additional $50$100 million. Interest accrues onThe borrowings underof the amendedUS portion of the credit facility accrue interest, at the Company's option, at either the(i) a base rate (the applicable prime lending rate(generally defined as the highest of (x) the Bank of America Business Capital as announced from time to time) (3.25% at August 1, 2009prime rate, (y) the average overnight federal funds effective rate plus one-half percent (0.50%)


Table of Contents

per annum and 5.00% at August 2, 2008)(z) one-month LIBOR plus one percent (1%) per annum) plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or at(ii) the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") for one, two, three or six months or, if approved by all affected lenders, nine months plus 0.75%an initial margin of 1.50%. The amendedborrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility matures on November 27, 2012. The weighted averagefor Canadian swing-line loans, Canadian overadvance loans or Canadian protective advances accrue interest, at the Company's option, at either (i) a prime rate (generally defined as the highest of (x) 0.50% over 30-day Reuters Canadian Deposit Offering Rate for bankers' acceptances, (y) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A.'s Canada branch, and (z) a bankers' acceptance equivalent rate for a one month interest period plus 1.00%) plus an initial margin of 0.50%, or (ii) a bankers' acceptance equivalent rate of the rate of interest per annum equal to the annual rates applicable to Canadian Dollar bankers' acceptances on the amended"CDOR Page" of Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service, plus five basis points (the "CDOR rate"), and an initial margin of 1.50%. All other borrowings on the Canadian portion of the credit facility was 1.05% as of August 1, 2009.must exclusively accrue interest under the CDOR rate plus the applicable margin. An annual commitment fee in the amount of 0.125% is payable monthly based on0.30% if the average daily unused portionbalance of amounts actually used (other than swing-line loans) is less than 40% of the amended credit facility.aggregate commitments, or 0.25% if such average daily balance is 40% or more of the aggregate commitments.

        As of August 1, 2009,July 28, 2012, the Company's borrowing base, based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory levels, was $483.7 million. As of July 28, 2012, the Company had $115.0 million outstanding under the Company's credit facility, $24.0 million in letter of credit commitments and $2.9 million in reserves which generally reduces the Company's available borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility on a dollar for dollar basis. The Company's resulting remaining availability was $341.8 million as of July 28, 2012. During fiscal 2012, the Company used borrowings under the amendedrevolving credit facility totaled $200.0 million with an availability of $137.0 million.to pay off its term loan.

        On June 4, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment, which was effective as of May 28, 2008, to the amendedThe revolving credit facility, in order to (i) waive events of default as a result of the Company's noncompliance at April 26, 2008 with the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant under amended credit facility (the "Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant"), (ii) increase the interest rate applicable to borrowings under the amended credit facility by 0.25% during the period from June 1, 2008 through the date on which the Company demonstrates compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant, and (iii) exclude non-cash share based compensation expense from the calculation of EBITDA (as defined under the amended credit facility) in connection with the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio under the amended credit facility. The amended credit facility requiresrestated, subjects the Company to maintain a springing minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the underlying credit agreement) of 1.51.0 to 1.0 calculated at the end of each of the Company'sits fiscal quarters on a rolling four quarter basis with which the Company was in compliance in fiscal 2009. The principal reason for the Company's earlier noncompliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant was the Company's high level of capital expenditureswhen aggregate availability (as defined in the trailing twelve month period ending April 26, 2008.

underlying credit agreement) is less than the greater of (i) $35.0 million and (ii) 10% of the aggregate borrowing base. The Company was in compliance with all restrictivenot subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenants at August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008.as of the fiscal year ended July 28, 2012.

        The amended credit facility also providesallows for the banklenders thereunder to syndicate the credit facility to other banks and lending institutions. The Company has pledged the majority of its accounts receivable and inventory for its obligations under the amended and restated credit facility.


Table of Contents

(7)   LONG-TERM DEBT

        TheDuring the year ended July 28, 2012, the Company entered into a $30 millionused the availability under its amended and restated revolving credit facility to pay off its term loan agreement with a financial institution effective April 30, 2003. The term loan was repayable over seven years based on a fifteen year amortization schedule. Interestwhich accrued interest at 30 day LIBOR plus 1.50%. The Company has pledged certain real property as collateral for its obligations under the term loan agreement. In1.0% and was to mature in July 2005, the Company amended the term loan agreement with the financial institution, increasing the principal amount available up to $75 million, decreasing the interest rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 1.0%, and extending the maturity date to July 2012. In connection with the amendments to the amended credit facility described in Note 6, effective November 2, 2007 and November 27, 2007, the Company amended its term loan agreement to conform certain terms and conditions to the corresponding terms and conditions under the amended credit facility.


        On June 4, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment, which was effective asTable of May 28, 2008, to the term loan agreement in order to (i) waive events of default as a result of the Company's noncompliance at April 26, 2008 with the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant under the term loan agreement (the "Term Loan Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant"), (ii) increase the interest rate applicable to borrowings under the Company's term loan by 0.25% during the period from June 1, 2008 through the date on which the Company demonstrates compliance with the Term Loan Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant, and (iii) exclude non-cash share based compensation expense from the calculation of EBITDA (as defined in the term loan agreement) in connection with the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio under the term loan agreement. The term loan agreement, as amended, requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.45 to 1.0, calculated at the end of each of the Company's fiscal quarters on a rolling four quarter basis. The principal reason for the Company's noncompliance with the Term Loan Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant was the Company's high level of capital expenditures in the trailing twelve month period ending April 26, 2008.Contents

        As of August 1, 2009July 28, 2012 and August 2, 2008,July 30, 2011, the Company's long-term debt consisted of the following:

 
 August 1,
2009
 August 2,
2008
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Term loan payable to bank, secured by real estate, due monthly, and maturing in July 2012, at an interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.00% (1.28% at August 1, 2009 and 3.46% at August 2, 2008)

 $56,926 $61,244 

Real estate and equipment term loans payable to bank, secured by building and other assets, due monthly and maturing at June 1, 2015, at an interest rate of 8.60%

  1,075  1,208 

Term loan for employee stock ownership plan, secured by common stock of the Company, due monthly and maturing at May 1, 2015, at an interest rate of 10.00%

  877  1,040 

Other

  0  20 
      

 $58,878 $63,512 
 

Less: current installments

  5,020  5,027 
      
 

Long-term debt, excluding current installments

 $53,858 $58,485 
      

        Certain of the Company's long-term debt agreements contain restrictive covenants. The Company was in compliance with all of its restrictive covenants, including the Term Loan Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant, at August 1, 2009.


Table of Contents

 
 July 28,
2012
 July 30,
2011
 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Term loan payable to bank, secured by real estate, due monthly, and maturing in July 2012, at an interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.00% (1.19% at July 30, 2011)

   $47,111 

Real estate and equipment term loans payable to bank, secured by building and other assets, due monthly and maturing in June 2015, at an interest rate of 8.60%

  598  771 

Term loan for employee stock ownership plan, secured by common stock of the Company, due monthly and maturing in May 2015, at an interest rate of 1.33%

  387  551 
      

 $985 $48,433 

Less: current installments

  350  47,447 
      

Long-term debt, excluding current installments

 $635 $986 
      

        Aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter are as follows at August 1, 2009:July 28, 2012:

Year
 (In thousands) 

2010

 $5,020 

2011

  5,033 

2012

  47,839 

2013

  351 

2014

  369 

2015 and thereafter

  266 
    

 $58,878 
    

Year
 (In thousands) 

2013

 $350 

2014

  371 

2015

  264 

2016

   

2017

   

2018 and thereafter

   
    

 $985 
    

(8)   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

        As of August 3, 2008,2, 2009, the Company had fully adopted SFAS No. 157,ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("SFAS 157"ASC 820"), for financial assets and liabilities and for non-financial assets and liabilities that we recognizeare recognized or disclosedisclosed at fair value on at least an annual basis. SFAS 157ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. SFAS 157ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. SFAS 157ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:


Table of Contents