Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)  

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122013

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-11314



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
 71-0720518
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 350
Westlake Village, California 91361
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (805) 981-8655



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common stock, $.01 Par Value

 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:NONE



          Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
    (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
  

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o    No ý



          The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $1,076,864,447$1,328,151,000 as of June 30, 201228, 2013 (the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter). For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by officers and directors of the registrant and shares of common stock held by persons who hold more than 10% of the outstanding common stock of the Registrant have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 14, 20132014 was 30,564,368.34,804,385.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

          Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.

   



CAUTIONARY STATEMENTSSTATEMENT

        This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, adopted pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not purely historical may be forward-looking. You can identify some of the forward-looking statements by their use of forward-looking words, such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "approximately," "intends," "plans," "estimates" or "anticipates," or the negative of those words or similar words. Forward- looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties regarding events, conditions and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operation, business strategy, results of operations and financial position. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those included within or contemplated by such forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the status of the economy; the status of capital markets (including prevailing interest rates) and our access to capital; the income and returns available from investments in health care related real estate;estate (including our ability to re-lease properties upon expiration of a lease term); the ability of our borrowers and lessees to meet their obligations to us; our reliance on a few major operators; competition faced by our borrowers and lessees within the health care industry; regulation of the health care industry by federal, state and local governments including(including as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010;2010); changes in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement amounts including(including due to federal and state budget constraints;constraints); compliance with and changes to regulations and payment policies within the health care industry; debt that we may incur and changes in financing terms; our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust; the relative illiquidity of our real estate investments; potential limitations on our remedies when mortgage loans default; and risks and liabilities in connection with properties owned through limited liability companies and partnerships. For a discussion of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contemplated in the forward-looking statements, please see the discussion under "Risk Factors" contained in this annual report and in other information contained in this annual report and our publicly available filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any responsibility to update or revise any of these factors or to announce publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


PART I

Item 1.    BUSINESS

General

        LTC Properties, Inc., a health care real estate investment trust (or REIT), was incorporated on May 12, 1992 in the State of Maryland and commenced operations on August 25, 1992. We invest primarily in senior housing and long term care properties through acquisitions, development, mortgage loans and other investments. We conduct and manage our business as one operating segment, rather than multiple operating segments, for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. Our primary objectives are to create, sustain and enhance stockholder equity value and provide current income for distribution to stockholders through real estate investments in senior housing and long term care properties managed by experienced operators. Our primary senior housing and long term carehealthcare property types include skilled nursing properties (or SNF), assisted living properties (or ALF), independent living properties (or ILF), memory care properties (or MC) and combinations thereof. To meet these objectives, we attempt to invest in properties that provide opportunity for additional value and current returns to our stockholders and diversify our investment portfolio by geographic location, operator, property type and form of investment.

        Skilled nursing facilities provide restorative, rehabilitative and nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at acute care hospitals. Many skilled


nursing facilities provide ancillary services that include occupational, speech, physical, respiratory and


IV therapies, as well as sub-acute care services which are paid either by the patient, the patient's family, private health insurance, or through the federal Medicare or state Medicaid programs.

        Assisted living facilities serve elderly persons who require assistance with activities of daily living, but do not require the constant supervision skilled nursing facilities provide. Services are usually available 24 hours a day and include personal supervision and assistance with eating, bathing, grooming and administering medication. The facilities provide a combination of housing, supportive services, personalized assistance and health care designed to respond to individual needs.

        Independent living facilities, also known as retirement communities or senior apartments, offer a sense of community and numerous levels of service, such as laundry, housekeeping, dining options/meal plans, exercise and wellness programs, transportation, social, cultural and recreational activities, on-site security and emergency response programs. Many offer on-site conveniences like beauty/barber shops, fitness facilities, game rooms, libraries and activity centers.

        Memory care facilities offer specialized options for seniors with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. Purpose built, free-standing memory care facilities offer an attractive alternative for private-pay residents affected by memory loss in comparison to other accommodations that typically have been provided within a secured unit of an assisted living or skilled nursing facility. These facilities offer dedicated care and specialized programming for various conditions relating to memory loss in a secured environment that is typically smaller in scale and more residential in nature than traditional assisted living facilities. Residents require a higher level of care and more assistance with activities of daily living than in assisted living facilities. Therefore, these facilities have staff available 24 hours a day to respond to the unique needs of their residents.

        We were organized to qualify, and intend to continue to qualify, as a REIT. So long as we qualify, with limited exceptions, we may deduct distributions, both preferred dividends and common dividends, to our stockholders from our taxable income. We have made distributions, and intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders, in order to eliminate any federal tax liability.

Portfolio

        Our real estate investment in senior housing and long term care properties is managed and conducted as a single operating segment for internal reporting and for internal decision-making purposes. ALF, ILF, MC, and MC propertiescombinations thereof are included in the ALF property type. Range of care properties (or ROC) consistproperty type consists of properties providing skilled nursing and any combination of assisted living, independent living and/or memory care services. Other properties (or Other) property type consists of school properties and land held-for-use. In addition to the information below, seeItem 2. Properties for more information about our portfolio.


        The following table summarizes our real estate investment portfolio as of December 31, 2012 (dollar2013 (dollar amounts in thousands)thousands):

 
  
  
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2012
  
  
 Number of 
 
  
  
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2013
  
  
 Number of 
Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Rental
Income
 Interest
Income(1)
 Percentage
of
Revenues(2)
 Number of
Properties(3)
 SNF
Beds(4)
 ALF
Units(4)
 

Skilled Nursing(5)

 $463,319611,160  49.355.3%$44,82350,046 $2,8704,881  51.252.6% 88100  10,07212,217   

Assisted Living

  392,157412,024  41.737.3% 34,18241,641  2,2841,103  39.240.9% 104106    4,7134,852 

Range of Care

  55,73246,509  5.94.2% 6,9964,904  342314  7.95.0% 119  913733  392348 

Under Development(5)(6)

  16,64221,432  1.82.0%     0.0%      

SchoolsOther(7)

  12,32613,607  1.31.2% 1,5721,575    1.71.5% 2     
                  
���

Totals

 $940,1761,104,732  100.0%$87,57398,166 $5,4966,298  100.0% 205217  10,98512,950  5,1055,200 
                  

(1)
Includes interest income from mortgage loans.
(2)
Includes rental income and interest income from mortgage loans.
(3)
We have investments in 2930 states leased or mortgaged to 4340 different operators.
(4)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(5)
Includes a newmortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.
(6)
Includes three MC development with 60 units and two new ALF developments with a total of 158168 units, a new 143-bedcombination ALF and MC development with 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
(7)
Includes two school properties and a 120-bed SNF redevelopment project.four parcels of land held-for-use.

        As of December 31, 20122013 we had $740.8$884.4 million in carrying value of net real estate investment, consisting of $701.5$718.9 million or 94.7%81.3% invested in owned and leased properties and $39.3$165.4 million or 5.3%18.7% invested in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages.

        Owned Properties.    The following table summarizes our investment in owned properties at December 31, 20122013(dollar amounts in thousands):


  
  
  
 Number of  
   
  
  
 Number of  
 
Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Number of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds(2)
 ALF
Units(2)
 Investment
per
Bed/Unit
  Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Number of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds(2)
 ALF
Units(2)
 Investment
per
Bed/Unit
 

Skilled Nursing

 $438,388 48.7% 71 8,211  $53.39  $458,759 48.9% 68 8,264  $55.51 

Assisted Living

 379,869 42.2% 96  4,502 $84.38  399,912 42.7% 98  4,641 $86.17 

Range of Care

 52,870 5.9% 10 814 318 $46.70  43,907 4.7% 8 634 274 $48.36 

Under Development(3)

 16,642 1.8%      21,432 2.3%     

Schools

 12,326 1.4% 2    

Other(4)

 13,607 1.4% 2    
                          

Totals

 $900,095 100.0% 179 9,025 4,820    $937,617 100.0% 176 8,898 4,915   
                          
             

(1)
We have investments in 2627 states leased to 3533 different operators.
(2)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(3)
Includes a newthree MC development with 60 units and two new ALF developments with a total of 158168 units, a new 143-bedcombination ALF and MC development with 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
(4)
Includes two school properties and a 120-bed SNF redevelopment project.four parcels of land held-for-use.

        Owned properties are leased pursuant to non-cancelable operating leases generally with an initial term of 10 to 15 years. Many of the leases contain renewal options. The leases provide for fixed minimum base rent during the initial and renewal periods. The majority of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and that increase is generally computed in one of four ways depending on specific provisions of each lease:

    (i)
    a specified percentage increase over the prior year's rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

    (ii)
    a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;


    (iii)
    as a percentage of facility net patient revenues in excess of base amounts or

    (iv)
    specific dollar increases.

        Each lease is a triple net lease which requires the lessee to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, capital and non-capital expenditures and other costs necessary in the operations of the facilities. Generally our leases provide for one or more of the following: security deposits, property tax impounds, and credit enhancements such as corporate or personal guarantees or letters of credit. In addition, our leases are typically structured as master leases and multiple master leases with one operator are generally cross defaulted. SeeItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—NOTE 6. Real Estate Investments for further descriptions. The following table summarizes our top ten operators for 2013 and percentage of rental revenue for our top tenthose operators for 20122013 and 2011:2012:


 Percent of
Rental Revenue
  Percent of
Rental Revenue
 
Lessee
 2012 2011  2013 2012 

Senior Care Centers, LLC

 12.0% 12.5%

Extendicare, Inc. and Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.

 12.5% 14.1% 11.2% 12.7%

Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc.

 12.3% 13.6% 11.2% 12.5%

Preferred Care, Inc.

 11.4% 12.6% 10.1% 11.6%

Senior Care Centers, LLC

 6.9% 4.3%

Juniper Communities, LLC

 6.8% 0.3%

Traditions Senior Mgmt, Inc.

 6.0% 4.8% 5.6% 6.1%

Meridian Sr. Properties Fund II, LP

 5.4% 4.7%

Carespring Healthcare Management, LLC

 5.5% 2.6%

Sunrise Senior Living

 5.3% 5.9% 4.7% 5.4%

Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.

 5.1% 5.8% 4.6% 5.2%

Emeritus Senior Living

 3.4% 3.5%

Fundamental Long Term Care Company

 3.4% 2.2% 3.4% 3.4%

        Mortgage Loans.    As part of our strategy of making long term investments in properties used in the provision of long term health care services, we provide mortgage financing on such properties based on our established investment underwriting criteria. We have also provided construction loans that by their terms converted into purchase/lease transactions or permanent financing mortgage loans upon completion of construction. The following table summarizes our investments in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages at December 31, 20122013 (dollar(dollar amounts in thousands):


  
  
  
  
 Number of  
   
  
  
  
 Number of  
 

  
  
  
  
 Average
Investment
per
Bed/Unit
   
  
  
  
 Average
Investment
per
Bed/Unit
 
Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Number
of Loans
 Number of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds(2)
 ALF
Units(2)
  Gross
Investments
 Percentage
of
Investments
 Number
of Loans
 Number of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds(2)
 ALF
Units(2)
 

Skilled Nursing(3)

 $24,931 62.2% 16 17 1,861  $13.40  $152,401 91.2% 16 32 3,953  $38.55 

Assisted Living

 12,288 30.7% 3 8  211 $58.24  12,112 7.2% 3 8  211 $57.40 

Range of Care

 2,862 7.1% 1 1 99 74 $16.54  2,602 1.6% 1 1 99 74 $15.04 
                              

Totals

 $40,081 100.0% 20 26 1,960 285    $167,115 100.0% 20 41 4,052 285   
                              
               

(1)
We have investments in 9 states that include mortgages to 12 different operators.
(2)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(3)
Includes a mortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.

        In general, with the exception of a mortgage loan secured by 15 skilled nursing properties in Michigan, the mortgage loans may not be prepaid except in the event of the sale of the collateral property to a third party that is not affiliated with the borrower, although partial prepayments (including the prepayment premium) are often permitted where a mortgage loan is secured by more than one property upon a sale of one or more, but not all, of the collateral properties to a third party which is not an affiliate of the borrower. The terms of the mortgage loans generally impose a premium


upon prepayment of the loans depending upon the period in which the prepayment occurs, whether such prepayment was permitted or required, and certain other conditions such as upon the sale of the property under a pre-existing purchase option, destruction or condemnation, or other circumstances as approved by us. On certain loans, such prepayment amount is based upon a percentage of the then outstanding balance of the loan, usually declining ratably each year. For other loans, the prepayment


premium is based on a yield maintenance formula. The mortgage loan secured by 15 skilled nursing properties in Michigan has a one-time option between November 2015 and October 2025 to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. Exclusively for the purposes of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from the portfolio of properties securing the loan. In addition to a lien on the mortgaged property, the loans are generally secured by certain non-real estate assets of the properties and contain certain other security provisions in the form of letters of credit, pledged collateral accounts, security deposits, cross-default and cross-collateralization features and certain guarantees. SeeItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further description.

Investment and Other Policies

        Objectives and Policies.    Our investment policy is to invest primarily in income-producing senior housing and long term care properties. Over the past three years (2010(2011 through 2012)2013), we acquired skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living, memory care properties and combinations thereof, plus fivetwelve parcels of land for a total of approximately $367.1$291.9 million. We also invested approximately $9.4$137.1 million in mortgage loans over the past three years. We believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations and development commitments, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and finance future investments should we determine such future investments are financially feasible. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates. We continuously evaluate the availability of cost-effective capital and believe we have sufficient liquidity for additional capital investments in 2013.2014.

        Our primary marketing and development focus is to increase the awareness of our presence at the state and localregional levels through participation in various health care associations and trade shows.associations. We believe that this targeted marketing effort has increased deal flow and continues to provide opportunities for new investments in 2013.2014. Since the competition from buyers for large transactions consisting of multiple property portfolios generally results in pricing that does not meet our investment criteria, our marketing efforts primarily focus on single property transactions or smaller multiple property portfolios that complement our historic investments and are priced with yields that are accretive to our stockholders.

        Historically our investments have consisted of:

    fee ownership of senior housing and long term care properties that are leased to providers;

    mortgage loans secured by senior housing and long term care properties; or

    participation in such investments indirectly through investments in real estate partnerships or other entities that themselves make direct investments in such loans or properties.

        In evaluating potential investments, we consider factors such as:

    type of property;

    the location;

    construction quality, condition and design of the property;


    the property's current and anticipated cash flow and its adequacy to meet operational needs and lease obligations or debt service obligations;

    the experience, reputation and solvency of the licensee providing services;

    the payor mix of private, Medicare and Medicaid patients;

    the growth, tax and regulatory environments of the communities in which the properties are located;

    the occupancy and demand for similar properties in the area surrounding the property; and

    the Medicaid reimbursement policies and plans of the state in which the property is located.

            Prior to every investment, we conduct a property site review to assess the general physical condition of the property and the potential of additional services. In addition, we review the environmental reports, site surveys and financial statements of the property before the investment is made.

            We believe skilled nursing facilities are the lowest cost provider for certain levels of acuity; therefore, playssuch facilities play a vital role in our nation's health care delivery system. Our investments include direct ownership, development and mortgages secured by skilled nursing properties. We prefer to invest in a property that has a significant market presence in its community and where state certificate of need and/or licensing procedures limit the entry of competing properties.

            We believe that assisted living, independent living and memory care facilities are an important sector in the long term care market and our investments include direct ownership, development and mortgages secured by assisted living, independent living and/or memory care properties. We have attempted to diversify our portfolio both geographically and across product levels.

            Borrowing Policies.    We may incur additional indebtedness when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. We may incur such indebtedness to make investments in additional senior housing and long term care properties or to meet the distribution requirements imposed upon REITs under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. For other short-term purposes, we may, from time to time, negotiate lines of credit, or arrange for other short-term borrowings from banks or otherwise. We may also arrange for long termlong-term borrowings through public or private offerings or from institutional investors.

            In addition, we may incur mortgage indebtedness on real estate which we have acquired through purchase, foreclosure or otherwise. We may also obtain mortgage financing for unleveraged or underleveraged properties in which we have invested or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis.

            Prohibited Investments and Activities.    Our policies, which are subject to change by our Board of Directors without stockholder approval, impose certain prohibitions and restrictions on our investment practices or activities including prohibitions against:

      investing in any junior mortgage loan unless by appraisal or other method, our Board of Directors determine that

      (a)
      the capital invested in any such loan is adequately secured on the basis of the equity of the borrower in the property underlying such investment and the ability of the borrower to repay the mortgage loan; or

      (b)
      such loan is a financing device we enter into to establish the priority of our capital investment over the capital invested by others investing with us in a real estate project;


        investing in commodities or commodity futures contracts (other than interest rate futures, when used solely for hedging purposes);

        investing more than 1% of our total assets in contracts for the sale of real estate unless such contracts are recordable in the chain of title;

        holding equity investments in unimproved, non-income producing real property, except such properties as are currently undergoing development or are presently intended to be developed within one year, together with mortgage loans on such property (other than first mortgage development loans), aggregating to more than 10% of our assets.

      Competition

              In the health care industry, we compete for real property investments with health care providers, other health care related REITs, real estate partnerships, banks, private equity funds, venture capital funds and other investors. Many of our competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources and lower cost of capital than we have available to us. Our ability to compete successfully for real property investments will be determined by numerous factors, including our ability to identify suitable acquisition targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition and the availability and our cost of capital.

              The lessees and borrowers of our properties compete on a local, regional and, in some instances, national basis with other health care providers. The ability of the lessee or borrower to compete successfully for patients or residents at our properties depends upon several factors, including the levels of care and services provided by the lessees or borrowers, the reputation of the providers, physician referral patterns, physical appearances of the properties, family preferences, financial condition of the operator and other competitive systems of health care delivery within the community, population and demographics.

      Government Regulation

              The health care industry is heavily regulated by the government. Our borrowers and lessees who operate health care facilities are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governments. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. These changes may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by both government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. The failure of any borrower of funds from us or lessee of any of our properties to comply with such laws, requirements and regulations could result in sanctions or remedies such as denials of payment for new Medicare and Medicaid admissions, civil monetary penalties, state oversight and loss of Medicare and Medicaid participation or licensure. Such action could affect our borrower's or lessee's ability to operate its facility or facilities and could adversely affect such borrower's or lessee's ability to make debt or lease payments to us.

              The properties owned by us and the manner in which they are operated are affected by changes in the reimbursement, licensing and certification policies of federal, state and local governments. Properties may also be affected by changes in accreditation standards or procedures of accrediting agencies. In addition, expansion (including the addition of new beds or services or acquisition of medical equipment) and occasionally the discontinuation of services of health care facilities are, in some states, subjected to state and regulatory approval through "certificate of need" laws and regulations.


              The ability of our borrowers and lessees to generate revenue and profit determines the underlying value of that property to us. Revenues of our borrowers and lessees of skilled nursing properties are generally derived from payments for patient care. Sources of such payments for skilled nursing facilities include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, healthmanaged care service plans, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider arrangements, and self-insured employers, as well as the patients themselves.

              A significant portion of the revenue of our skilled nursing property borrowers and lessees is derived from governmentally-funded reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Because of significant health care costs paid by such government programs, both federal and state governments have adopted and continue to consider various health care reform proposals to control health care costs. Over the years there have been fundamental changes in the Medicare program that


      resulted in reduced levels of payment for a substantial portion of health care services, including skilled nursing facility services.costs.. In many instances, revenues from Medicaid programs are already insufficient to cover the actual costs incurred in providing care to thoseMedicaid patients. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 temporarily increased federal Medicaid payments by approximately $87 billion to help support state Medicaid programs facing budget shortfalls. An additional $16.1 billion in temporary enhanced federal Medicaid assistance was included in the Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act, which President Obama signed into law in August 2010. However, enhanced funding under this federal legislation expired in June 2011. Moreover, the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured reported in October 20122013 that nearly every state implementedthe majority of states (39) reported enacting new Medicaid rate restrictions for at least one new Medicaid policy to control spendingprovider type in fiscal year 2012, with 452013, while 34 states inplan rate restrictions for fiscal year 2012 implementing provider rate cuts or freezes,2014. On the other hand, the Kaiser Commission notes that due to improving state finances, more states are enhancing rates than restricting rates overall in 2013 and 42 states planning2014. With regard to do so in fiscal year 2013. Twenty-eight states restricted nursing home rates in fiscal year 2012 (16 rate freezes and 12 cuts), while 20particular, 34 states plan to restrictincreased rates in fiscal year 2013 (17and 38 have adopted rate freezes and three rate cuts). On the other hand, 23 states increasedincreases for fiscal year 2014, compared to nursing home ratesrate restrictions being adopted in 17 states in fiscal year 20122013 and 30 plan to do so12 states in fiscal year 2013.2014. In addition, many states have been making changes to their long term care delivery systems that emphasize home and community-based long term care services, in some cases coupled with cost controls for institutional providers. According to the Kaiser Commission, 2933 states in FY 2012fiscal year 2013 and 3435 states in FY 2013fiscal year 2014 took action to expand long term care services (primarily expandingthe number of individuals serviced in home and community-based service programs), while 10 states in FY 2012 and 7 states in FY 2013 acted to restrict long term care services.programs. The federal government also has adopted policies to promote community-based alternatives to institutional services. Most recently, on January 16, 2014, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (or CMS) published a rule that provides states with new flexibility to offer home and community based-services as an optional Medicaid benefit and to draw federal matching funds. As states and the federal government continue to respond to budget pressures, future reduction in Medicaid and/or Medicare payments for skilled nursing facility services could have an adverse effect on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees which could, in turn, adversely impact the timing or level of their payments to us.

              Over the years there also have been fundamental changes in the Medicare program that resulted in reduced levels of payment for a substantial portion of health care services, including skilled nursing facility services. CMS annually updates Medicare skilled nursing facility prospective payment system rates and other policies. On August 6, 2013, CMS published its final Medicare skilled nursing facility payment rate update for fiscal year 2014, which began on October 1, 2013. CMS estimates that the final rule will increase aggregate Medicare skilled nursing facility payments by $470 million, or 1.3%, compared to fiscal year 2013 levels. Specifically, under the final rule, Medicare rates are updated to reflect a 2.3% market basket increase that is reduced by a 0.5 percentage point "multifactor productivity adjustment" mandated by the Affordable Care Act, and that is further reduced by a 0.5 percentage point forecast error correction. CMS also rebased the skilled nursing facility market basket to reflect fiscal year 2010 data and made other policy changes. There can be no assurance that any future reductions in Medicare skilled nursing facility payment rates or other policy changes would not have an adverse effect on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees which could, in turn, adversely impact the timing or level of their payments to us.

              Moreover, health care facilities continue to experience pressures from private payors attempting to control health care costs, and reimbursement from private payors has in many cases effectively been reduced to levels approaching those of government payors.

              The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (or CMS) annually updates Medicare skilled nursing facility prospective payment system rates and other policies. On July 29, 2011, CMS issued its final rule updating Medicare skilled nursing facility rates for fiscal year 2012, which began on October 1, 2011. Under the final rule, average Medicare rates were reduced by 11.1%, or $3.87 billion, compared to fiscal year 2011 levels. CMS has stated that the rate reduction was needed to recalibrate skilled nursing facility payment rates to correct what CMS characterized as an "unintended spike" in payments in fiscal year 2011, when CMS implemented the Resource Utilization Groups, version four (or RUG-IV) patient classification system. Although CMS intended implementation of RUG-IV to be budget-neutral, CMS has taken the position that claims under the updated system show a significant increase in Medicare expenditures, in part because the proportion of patients grouped in the highest-paying RUG therapy categories greatly exceeded CMS expectations. CMS applied a 12.6% recalibration reduction, which was partially offset by a 1.7% standard rate update (which represented a 2.7% market basket update reduced by a 1.0% percentage point "multifactor productivity adjustment" mandated by the Affordable Care Act). On August 2, 2012, CMS published a notice updating Medicare skilled nursing facility payment rates for fiscal year 2013, which began on October 1, 2012. The notice calls for a 1.8 percent update in rates (consisting of a 2.5% market basket update, reduced by a 0.7 percentage point multifactor productivity adjustment). CMS estimates that overall Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities in fiscal year 2013 will increase by $670 million compared to fiscal year 2012. In addition, on November 9, 2012, CMS published a final rule that, among other things, codifies provisions of section 3201 of the Middle Class Tax Extension and Job Creation Act of 2012 that require reductions in bad debt reimbursement to all providers, suppliers, and other entities eligible to receive bad debt reimbursement. The rule gradually reduces the amount Medicare skilled nursing facilities can claim as bad debt to 65% of allowable bad debt by fiscal year 2015. There can be no assurance that


      these rules or any future reductions in Medicare skilled nursing facility payment rates would not have an adverse effect on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees which could, in turn, adversely impact the timing or level of their payments to us.

      Governmental and public concern regarding health care costs may result in significant reductions in payment to health care facilities, and there can


      be no assurance that future payment rates for either governmental or private payors will be sufficient to cover cost increases in providing services to patients. Any changes in reimbursement policies which reduce reimbursement to levels that are insufficient to cover the cost of providing patient care could adversely affect revenues of our skilled nursing property borrowers and lessees and to a much lesser extent our assisted living property borrowers and lessees and thereby adversely affect those borrowers' and lessees' abilities to make their debt or lease payments to us. Failure of the borrowers or lessees to make their debt or lease payments would have a direct and material adverse impact on us.

              Various federal and state laws govern financial and other arrangements between health care providers that participate in, receive payments from, or make or receive referrals for work in connection with government funded health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. These laws, known as the fraud and abuse laws, include the federal anti-kickback statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration directly or indirectly in return for, or to induce, the referral, or arrange for the referral, of an individual to a person for the furnishing of an item or service for which payment may be made under federal health care programs. In addition, the federal physician self-referral law, commonly known as Stark II (or the Stark Law),Law, prohibits physicians and certain other types of practitioners from making referrals for certain designated health services paid in whole or in part by Medicare and Medicaid to entities with which the practitioner or a member of the practitioner's immediate family has a financial relationship, unless the financial relationship fits within an applicable exception to the Stark Law. The Stark Law also prohibits the entity receiving the referral from seeking payment under the Medicare and Medicaid programsprogram for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. If an entity is paid for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral, it may incur civil penalties of up to $15,000 per prohibited claim and may be excluded from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Many states have enacted similar fraud and abuse laws which are not necessarily limited to items and services for which payment is made by federal health care programs. Violations of these laws may result in fines, imprisonment, denial of payment for services, and exclusion from federal and/or other state-funded programs. Other federal and state laws authorize the imposition of penalties, including criminal and civil fines and exclusion from participation in federal health care programs for submitting false claims, improper billing and other offenses. Federal and state government agencies have continued rigorous enforcement of criminal and civil fraud and abuse laws in the health care arena. Our borrowers and lessees are subject to many of these laws, and some of them could in the future become the subject of a governmental enforcement action.

      Health Care Reform and Other Legislative Developments

              Congress and the state legislatures regularly consider, and in some cases adopt, legislation impacting health care providers, including long term care providers. For instance, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 enacted significant changes to the Medicare and Medicaid programs designed to modernize payment and health care delivery systems while achieving substantial budgetary savings. Among other things, the law established the Medicare prospective payment system for skilled nursing facility services to replace the cost-based reimbursement system, which resulted in significant reductions in Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities. Over the years, Congress adopted legislation to somewhat mitigate the impact of the new payment system, including a temporary payment add-on for high-acuity patients, which subsequently expired, and a temporary payment add-on for residents with AIDS that still is in effect through fiscal year 2013.2014. Other legislation enacted by Congress in recent years has reduced certain


      Medicare skilled nursing facility bad debt payments, strengthened Medicaid asset transfer restrictions for persons seeking to qualify for Medicaid long term care coverage, reduced Medicaid provider taxes that are used by many states to finance state health programs, and given states greater flexibility to expand access to home and community based services.


              In March 2010, the President signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which subsequently was amended by the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the "Affordable Care Act"). The Affordable Care Act is designed to expand access to affordable health insurance, contain health care costs, and institute a variety of health policy reforms. The provisions of the sweeping law may affect us directly, as well as impact our lessees and borrowers. While certain provisions, such as expanding the insured population, may positively impact the revenues of our lessees and borrowers, other provisions, particularly those intended to reduce federal health care spending, could have a negative impact on our lessees and borrowers. Among other things, the Affordable Care Act: reduces Medicare skilled nursing facility reimbursement by a so-called "productivity adjustment" based on economy-wide productivity gains beginning in fiscal year 2012;gains; requires the development of a value-based purchasing program for Medicare skilled nursing facility services; establishes a national voluntary pilot program to bundle Medicare payments for hospital and post-acute services that could lead to changes in the delivery of post-acute services; and provides incentives to state Medicaid programs to promote community-based care as an alternative to institutional long term care services. The Affordable Care Act also includes provisions intended to expand public disclosure about nursing home ownership and operations, institute mandatory compliance and quality assurance programs, increase penalties for noncompliance, and expand fraud and abuse enforcement and penalty provisions that could impact our operators. In addition, the Affordable Care Act impacts both us and our lessees and borrowers as employers, including new requirements related to the health insurance we offer to our respective employees. Many aspects of the Affordable Care Act are being implemented through new regulations and subregulatory guidance. We cannot predict at this time what effect, if any, the various provisions of the Affordable Care Act will have on our lessees and borrowers or our business when fully implemented. There can be no assurances, however, that the Affordable Care Act will not adversely impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our lessees and borrowers, which subsequently could materially adversely impact our revenue and operations.

              On August 2, 2011, President Obama signed into lawUnder the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011, which increasedas modified by the nation's debt ceiling while taking stepsAmerican Taxpayer Relief Act, President Obama issued a sequestration order on March 1, 2013 that mandates a 2% cut to reduce the federal deficit. Under this law, a bipartisan Joint Select CommitteeMedicare payments to providers and health plans. The cuts generally apply to Medicare fee-for-service claims with dates-of-service or dates-of-discharge on Deficit Reduction was responsible for identifying $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction, which could include cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal spending and/or revenue increases. The Committee failed to achieve consensus on deficit reduction measures. As a result, an enforcement mechanism known as sequestration was scheduled to trigger a total of $1.2 trillion in spending reductions beginning in January 2013, divided between domestic and defense spending. Under the Budget Control Act, Medicare provider payments are subject to sequestration, although the reductions are capped at 2%.after April 1, 2013. On January 2,December 26, 2013, President Obama signed into law H.J. Res. 59, the American Taxpayer ReliefBipartisan Budget Act of 2012,2013, which among other things, delaysextended the Medicare sequestration cuts for another two months in order to provide an additional opportunity foryears, through 2023, although Congress and the PresidentAdministration could enact legislation to agree onend or modify sequestration at any time, including through alternative deficit reduction options. The American Taxpayer Relief Act also made a series of changes tobudget legislation that includes alternative Medicare payment provisions.or Medicaid savings. There can be no assurances that federal spending reductions resulting from the Budget Control Actenacted or otherfuture budget control mechanisms will not have an adverse impact on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees, which subsequently could materially adversely impact our company.

              In addition, comprehensive reforms affecting the payment for and availability of health care services have been proposed at the state level and adopted by certain states. Congress and state legislatures can be expected to continue to review and assess alternative health care delivery systems


      and payment methodologies.methodologies, including potential changes in Medicare payment policy for skilled nursing facility services and other types of post-acute care. Changes in the law, new interpretations of existing laws, or changes in payment methodologies may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by the government and other third party payors.

      Environmental Matters

              Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender (such as us) may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as


      other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner or secured lender knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances and may be imposed on the owner or secured lender in connection with the activities of an operator of the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner's or secured lender's liability therefore could exceed the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, would reduce our revenues.

              Although the mortgage loans that we provide and leases covering our properties require the borrower and the lessee to indemnify us for certain environmental liabilities, the scope of such obligations may be limited and we cannot assure that any such borrower or lessee would be able to fulfill its indemnification obligations.

      Insurance

              It is our current policy, and we intend to continue this policy, that all borrowers of funds from us and lessees of any of our properties secure adequate comprehensive property and general and professional liability insurance that covers us as well as the borrower and/or lessee. Even though that is our policy, certain borrowers and lessees have been unable to obtain general and professional liability insurance in the specific amounts required by our leases or mortgages because the cost of such insurance and some insurers have stopped offering such insurance for long term care facilities. Additionally, in the past, insurance companies have filed for bankruptcy protection leaving certain of our borrowers and/or lessees without coverage for periods that were believed to be covered prior to such bankruptcies. The unavailability and associated exposure as well as increased cost of such insurance could have a material adverse effect on the lessees and borrowers, including their ability to make lease or mortgage payments. Although we contend that as a non-possessory landlord we are not generally responsible for what takes place on real estate we do not possess, claims including general and professional liability claims, may still be asserted against us which may result in costs and exposure for which insurance is not available. Certain risks may be uninsurable, not economically insurable or insurance may not be available and there can be no assurance that we, a borrower or lessee will have adequate funds to cover all contingencies. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, we could be subject to an adverse claim including claims for general or professional liability, could lose the capital that we have invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue for the properties and, in the case of debt which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Certain losses, such as losses due to floods or seismic activity if insurance is available, may be insured subject to certain limitations including large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits.


      Employees

              At December 31, 2012,2013, we employed 18 people. Our employees are not members of any labor union, and we consider our relations with our employees to be excellent.

      Taxation of our Company

              We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code (or the Code). We believe that we have been organized and have operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code commencing with our taxable year ending


      December 31, 1992. We intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but there is no assurance that we have operated or will continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified.

              If we continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on our net income that is currently distributed to our stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the "double taxation" (once at the corporate level when earned and once at stockholder level when distributed) that generally results from investment in a non-REIT corporation.

              However, we will be subject to federal income tax as follows:

              First, we will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains.

              Second, under certain circumstances, we may be subject to the alternative minimum tax, if our dividend distributions are less than our alternative minimum taxable income.

              Third, if we have (i) net income from the sale or other disposition of foreclosure property which is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or (ii) other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we may elect to be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on such income, if necessary to maintain our REIT status.

              Fourth, if we have net income from "prohibited transactions" (as defined below), such income will be subject to a 100% tax.

              Fifth, if we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test (as discussed below), but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because certain other requirements have been met, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the gross income attributable to the greater of the amount by which we fail the 75% or 95% test multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

              Sixth, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts actually distributed.

              Seventh, if we acquire an asset which meets the definition of a built-in gain asset from a corporation which is or has been a C corporation (i.e., generally a corporation subject to full corporate-level tax) in certain transactions in which the basis of the built-in gain asset in our hands is determined by reference to the basis of the asset in the hands of the C corporation, and if we subsequently recognize gain on the disposition of such asset during the ten-year period, called the recognition period, beginning on the date on which we acquired the asset, then, to the extent of the built-in gain (i.e., the excess of (a) the fair market value of such asset over (b) our adjusted basis in such asset, both determined as of the beginning of the recognition period), such gain will be subject to tax at the highest regular corporate tax rate, pursuant to IRS regulations.


              Eighth, if we have taxable REIT subsidiaries and they are required to be reported on a consolidated basis, we would be subject to corporate tax on the taxable income of the taxable REIT subsidiaries. In addition, we will also be subject to a tax of 100% on the amount of any rents from real property, deductions or excess interest paid to us by any of our taxable REIT subsidiaries that would be reduced through reapportionment under certain federal income tax principles in order to more clearly reflect income for the taxable REIT subsidiary.

              Ninth, if we fail to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests, as described below, by more than a de minimus amount, due to reasonable cause and we nonetheless maintain our REIT qualification because of specified cure provisions, we will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the


      highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets that caused us to fail such test.

              Tenth, if we fail to satisfy any provision of the Code that would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT (other than a violation of the REIT gross income tests or certain violations of the asset tests described below) and the violation is due to reasonable cause, we may retain our REIT qualification but we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.

              Finally, if we own a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit (or REMIC), we will be taxed at the highest corporate rate on the portion of any excess inclusion income that we derive from the REMIC residual interests equal to the percentage of our shares that is held in record name by "disqualified organization." A "disqualified organization" includes the United States, any state or political subdivision thereof, any foreign government or international organization, any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing, any rural electrical or telephone cooperative and any tax-exempt organization (other than a farmer's cooperative described in Section 521 of the Code) that is exempt from income taxation and from the unrelated business taxable income provisions of the Code. However, to the extent that we own a REMIC residual interest through a taxable REIT subsidiary, we will not be subject to this tax.

              Requirements for Qualification.    The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

        (1)
        which is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

        (2)
        the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;

        (3)
        which would be taxable, but for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as a domestic corporation;

        (4)
        which is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code;

        (5)
        the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;

        (6)
        during the last half of each taxable year not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (including specified entities);

        (7)
        which meets certain other tests, described below, regarding the amount of its distributions and the nature of its income and assets;

        (8)
        that elects to be a REIT, or has made such election for a previous year, and satisfies the applicable filing and administrative requirements to maintain qualifications as a REIT; and

        (9)
        that adopts a calendar year accounting period.

              The Code provides that conditions (1) to (4), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Conditions (5) and (6) do not apply until after the first taxable year for which an election is made to be taxed as a REIT. For purposes of condition (6), pension funds and certain other entities are treated as individuals, subject to a "look-through" exception.


              Pursuant to the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, in order to be able to elect to be taxed as a REIT, we must maintain certain records and request certain information from our stockholders designed to disclose the actual ownership of our stock. Based on publicly available information, we believe we have satisfied the share ownership requirements set forth in conditions (5) and (6). In addition, Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of our Charter provide for restrictions regarding the transfer and ownership of shares. These restrictions are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6). These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6).

              We have complied with, and will continue to comply with, regulatory rules to send annual letters to certain of our stockholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our stock. If despite sending the annual letters, we do not know, or after exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, whether we failed to satisfy the ownership requirement set forth in condition (6) above, we will be treated as having satisfied such condition. If we fail to comply with these regulatory rules, we will be subject to a monetary penalty. If our failure to comply was due to intentional disregard of the requirement, the penalty would be increased. However, if our failure to comply was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, no penalty would be imposed.

              Income Tests.    There presently are two gross income requirements that we must satisfy to qualify as a REIT:

        First, at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from "prohibited transactions," as defined below) for each taxable year must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including rents from real property, or from certain types of temporary investment income.

        Second, at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must be directly or indirectly derived from income that qualifies under the 75% test, and from dividends (including dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries), interest and gain from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities.

              Cancellation of indebtedness income generated by us is not taken into account in applying the 75% and 95% income tests discussed above. A "prohibited transaction" is a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Any gain realized from a prohibited transaction is subject to a 100% penalty tax.

              Rents received by us will qualify as "rents from real property" for purposes of satisfying the gross income tests for a REIT only if several conditions are met:

        The amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although rents generally will not be excluded merely because they are based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales.

        Rents received from a tenant will not qualify as rents from real property if the REIT, or an owner of 10% or more of the REIT, also directly or constructively owns 10% or more of the tenant, unless the tenant is our taxable REIT subsidiary and certain other requirements are met with respect to the real property being rented.

        If rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to the personal property will not qualify as rents from real property.

        We generally must not furnish or render services to tenants, other than through a taxable REIT subsidiary or an "independent contractor" from whom we derive no income, except that we may directly provide services that are "usually or customarily rendered" in the geographic area in

          which the property is located in connection with the rental of real property for occupancy only, or are not otherwise "rendered to the occupant for his convenience."

              For taxable years beginning after August 5, 1997, a REIT has been permitted to render a de minimus amount of impermissible services to tenants and still treat amounts received with respect to that property as rents from real property. The amount received or accrued by the REIT during the taxable year for the impermissible services with respect to a property may not exceed 1% of all amounts received or accrued by the REIT directly or indirectly from the property. If the amount received or accrued by the REIT during the taxable year for impermissible services with respect to a property exceeds 1% of the total amounts received or accrued with respect to such property, then none of the rents received or accrued from such property shall be treated as rents from real property. The amount received for any service or management operation for this purpose shall be deemed to be not less than 150% of the direct cost of the REIT in furnishing or rendering the service or providing the management or operation. Furthermore, impermissible services may be furnished to tenants by a taxable REIT subsidiary subject to certain conditions, and we may still treat rents received with respect to the property as rent from real property.

              The term "interest" generally does not include any amount if the determination of the amount depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although an amount generally will not be excluded from the term "interest" solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage of receipts or sales.

              If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the year if we are eligible for relief. These relief provisions will be generally available if our failure to meet the tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to wilful neglect and following the identification of the failure to satisfy one or both income tests, a description of each item of gross income is filed in accordance with IRS regulations.

              It is not now possible to determine the circumstances under which we may be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. If these relief provisions apply, a 100% tax is imposed on an amount equal to (a) the gross income attributable to the greater of the amount by which we failed the 75% or 95% test, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

              Asset Tests.    At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy several tests relating to the nature and diversification of our assets. At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items (including receivables arising in the ordinary course of our operations), and government securities and qualified temporary investments. Although the remaining 25% of our assets generally may be invested without restriction, we are prohibited from owning securities representing more than 10% of either the vote or value of the outstanding securities of any issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary (the "10% vote and value test"). Further, no more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (for tax years beginning prior to July 30, 2008, 20% of the total value of our assets) and no more than 5% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of any non-governmental issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary (or TRS). Each of the 10% vote and value test and the 25% and 5% asset tests must be satisfied at the end of any quarter. There are special rules which provide relief if the value related tests are not satisfied due to changes in the value of the assets of a REIT.

              Investments in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.    For taxable years beginning after December 1, 2000, REITs may own more than 10% of the voting and value of securities in a TRS. A TRS is a corporation other than a REIT in which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock, and that has made a joint election with the REIT to be treated as a TRS. A TRS also includes any corporation other than a REIT with respect to which a TRS owns securities possessing more that 35% of the total voting power


      or value of the outstanding securities of such corporation. Other than some activities relating to lodging and health care facilities, a TRS may generally engage in any business, including the provision of customary or non-customary services to tenants of its parent REIT. A TRS is subject to income tax as a regular C corporation. In addition, a TRS may be prevented from deducting interest on debt funded directly or indirectly by its parent REIT if certain tests regarding the TRS's debt to equity ratio and interest expense are not satisfied. A REIT's ownership of a TRS will not be subject to the 10% or 5% asset tests described above, and its operations will be subject to the provisions described above. At this time, we do not have any taxable REIT subsidiaries.

              REMIC.    A regular or residual interest in a REMIC will be treated as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and income derived with respect to such interest will be treated as interest on an obligation secured by a mortgage on real property, assuming that at least 95% of the assets of the REMIC are real estate assets. If less than 95% of the assets of the REMIC are real estate assets, only a proportionate share of the assets of and income derived from the REMIC will be treated as qualifying under the REIT asset and income tests. All of our historical REMIC certificates were secured by real estate assets, therefore we believe that our historic REMIC interests fully qualified for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests.

              Ownership of Interests in Partnerships, Limited Liability Companies and Qualified REIT Subsidiaries.    During the year, we ownedWe own interests in various partnerships and limited liabilities companies. In the case of a REIT which is a partner in a partnership, or a member in a limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Treasury Regulations provide that the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership or limited liability company, based on its interest in partnership capital, subject to special rules relating to the 10% REIT asset test described above. Also, the REIT will be deemed to be entitled to its proportionate share of income of that entity. The assets and items of gross income of the partnership or limited liability company retain the same character in the hands of the REIT for purposes of Section 856 of the Code, including satisfying the gross income tests and the asset tests. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of partnerships and limited liability companies taxed as partnerships, in which we are, directly or indirectly through other partnerships or limited liability companies taxed as partnerships, a partner or member, are treated as our assets and items of income for purposes of applying the REIT qualification requirements described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (including the income and asset tests previously described).

              We also own interests in a number of subsidiaries which are intended to be treated as qualified REIT subsidiaries. The Code provides that such subsidiaries will be ignored for federal income tax purposes and that all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of such subsidiaries will be treated as assets, liabilities and such items of our company. If any partnership or qualified real estate investment trust subsidiary in which we own an interest were treated as a regular corporation (and not as a partnership or qualified real estate investment trust subsidiary) for federal income tax purposes, we would likely fail to satisfy the REIT asset test prohibiting a REIT from owning greater than 10% of the voting power of the stock or value of securities of any issuer, as described above, and would therefore fail to qualify as a REIT. We believe that each of the partnerships and subsidiaries in which we own an interest will be treated for tax purposes as a partnership or qualified REIT subsidiary, respectively, although no assurance can be given that the IRS will not successfully challenge the status of any such entity.


              Annual Distribution Requirements.    In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our stockholders annually in an amount at least equal to:

        (1)
        the sum of:

        (a)
        90% of our "real estate investment trust taxable income" (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain); and

        (b)
        90% of the net income, if any (after tax), from foreclosure property; minus

        (2)
        the excess of certain items of non-cash income over 5% of our real estate investment trust taxable income.

              In addition, if we dispose of any asset we acquired from a corporation which is or has been a C corporation in a transaction in which our basis in the asset is determined by reference to the basis of the asset in the hands of that C corporation, within the ten-year period following our acquisition of such asset, we would be required to distribute at least 90% of the after-tax gain, if any, we recognized on the disposition of the asset, to the extent that gain does not exceed the excess of (a) the fair market value of the asset on the date we acquired the asset over (b) our adjusted basis in the asset on the date we acquired the asset.

              We must pay these annual distributions (1) in the taxable year to which they relate or (2) in the following year if (i) we pay these distributions during January to stockholders of record in either October, November, or December of the prior year or (ii) we elect to declare the dividend before the due date of the tax return (including extensions) and pay on or before the first regular dividend payment date after such declaration.

              Amounts distributed must not be preferential; that is, every stockholder of the class of stock with respect to which a distribution is made must be treated the same as every other stockholder of that class, and no class of stock may be treated otherwise than in accordance with its dividend rights as a class.

              To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net long term capital gain or distribute at least 90% but less than 100%, of our "real estate investment trust taxable income," as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on such amounts at regular corporate tax rates. Furthermore, if we should fail to distribute during each calendar year (or, in the case of distributions with declaration and record dates in the last three months of the calendar year, by the end of the following January) at least the sum of:

        (1)
        85% of our real estate investment trust ordinary income for such year,

        (2)
        95% of our real estate investment trust capital gain net income for such year, and

        (3)
        100% of taxable income from prior periods less 100% of distributions from prior periods

              We would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distributions over the amounts actually distributed. Any real estate investment trust taxable income and net capital gain on which this excise tax is imposed for any year is treated as an amount distributed during that year for purposes of calculating such tax.

              We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual distribution requirements and to avoid the imposition of the 4% excise tax.

              Failure to Qualify.    If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and certain relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT will not be deductible by us, nor will any distributions be required to be made. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from


      re-electing our REIT status for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to the statutory relief in all circumstances. Failure to qualify as a REIT for even one year could substantially reduce distributions to stockholders and could result in our incurring substantial indebtedness (to the extent borrowings are feasible) or liquidating substantial investments in order to pay the resulting taxes.

              State and local taxation.    We may be subject to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business or reside. The state and local tax treatment of our Company may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed above.

      Investor Information

              We make available to the public free of charge through our internet website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC). Our internet website address iswww.LTCProperties.comwww.LTCProperties.com.. We are not including the information contained on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

              Posted on our websitewww.LTCProperties.com under the "Corporate Governance" heading are our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charters, our Corporate Governance Policies, and a Code of Business Conduct Ethics and Corporate GovernanceEthics governing our directors, officers and employees. Within the time period required by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (or NYSE), we will post on our website any amendment to the Code of Business Conduct Ethics and Corporate GovernanceEthics and any waiver applicable to our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Directors. In addition, our website under the heading "SEC Filings" includes information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors.

              You may read and copy materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549.20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm Eastern Standard Time. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information we file. The address of the SEC website iswww.sec.gov.

              You also may contact our Investor Relations Department at:

      LTC Properties, Inc.
      2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 350
      Westlake Village, California 91361
      Attn: Investor Relations
      (805) 981-8655

      Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS

              The following discussion of risk factors contains "forward-looking statements" as discussed above under the heading "Cautionary Statement." These risk factors may be important to understanding any statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

              A Failure to Maintain or Increase our Dividend Could Reduce the Market Price of Our Stock.    The ability to maintain or raise our common dividend is dependent, to a large part, on growth of funds


      available for distribution. This growth in turn depends upon increased revenues from additional investments and loans, rental increases and mortgage rate increases.

              At Times, We May Have Limited Access to Capital Which Will Slow Our Growth.    A REIT is required to make dividend distributions and retains little cash flow for growth. As a result, growth for a REIT is generally through the steady investment of new capital in real estate assets. There may be times when we will have limited access to capital from the equity and/or debt markets. During such periods, virtually all of our available capital would be required to meet existing commitments and to reduce existing debt. We may not be able, during such periods, to obtain additional equity and/or debt capital or dispose of assets on favorable terms, if at all, at the time we require additional capital to acquire health care properties on a competitive basis or meet our obligations. We believe that our $7.2 million cash balance atAt December 31, 2012, our low debt levels, $124.52013, we had $6.8 million of cash on hand, $219.0 million available under our $240.0 million Unsecured Credit Agreementunsecured revolving line of credit, and $100.0$30.0 million available under the uncommitted private shelf agreement for our senior unsecured notes. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $11.5 million and, ourtherefore, have $207.5 million available under or unsecured revolving line of credit. We also have the potential ability to access the capital markets through the issuance of $64.6 million of common stock under our Amended Equity Distribution Agreement and through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities under our $167.6$800.0 million effective shelf registration, will enable usregistration. As a result, we believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations and development commitments, meet ourdebt service obligations (both principal and continue tointerest), make investments.dividend distributions and finance some future investments should we determine such future investments are financially feasible.

              Income and Returns from Health Care Facilities Can be Volatile.    The possibility that the health care properties in which we invest will not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses, will generate income and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than those anticipated or will yield returns lower than those available through investments in comparable real estate or other investments are additional risks of investing in health care related real estate. Income from properties and yields from investments in such properties may be affected by many factors, including changes in governmental regulation (such as zoning laws and government payment), general or local economic conditions (such as fluctuations in interest rates and employment conditions), the available local supply of and demand for improved real estate, a reduction in rental income as the result of an inability to maintain occupancy levels, natural disasters (such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods) or similar factors.

              We Depend on Lease Income and Mortgage Payments from Real Property.    Approximately 99%99.5% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, was derived from lease income and mortgage payments from real property. Our revenue would be adversely affected if a significant number of our borrowers or lessees were unable to meet their obligations to us or if we were unable to lease our properties or make mortgage loans on economically favorable terms. There can be no assurance that any lessee will exercise its option to renew its lease upon the expiration of the initial term orterm. There can be no assurance that if such failure to renew were to occur, or if we did not re-lease a property to a current lessee, we could lease the property to others on favorable terms.terms, at the same rent as the current rent, or on a timely basis.

              We Rely on our Operators.    Substantially all of our revenues and sources of cash flows from operations are derived from operating lease rentals and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. Our investments in mortgage loans and owned properties represent our primary source of liquidity to fund distributions and are dependent upon the performance of the operators on their lease and loan obligations and the rates earned thereon. Our financial position and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by any of our lessees or borrowers, including bankruptcies, inability to emerge from bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in business of any such operator, or in the event any such operator does not renew and/or extend its relationship with us or our borrowers when it expires.


              Our Borrowers and Lessees Face Competition in the Health Care Industry.    The long term care industry is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. Our borrowers and lessees are competing with numerous other companies providing similar long term care services or alternatives such as home health agencies, hospices, life care at home, community-based service programs, retirement communities and convalescent centers. There can be no assurance that


      our borrowers and lessees will not encounter increased competition in the future which could limit their ability to attract residents or expand their businesses and therefore affect their ability to make their debt or lease payments to us.

              The Health Care Industry is Heavily Regulated by the Government.    Our borrowers and lessees who operate health care facilities are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governments. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. These changes may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by both government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. The failure of any borrower of funds from us or lessee of any of our properties to comply with such laws, requirements and regulations could affect its ability to operate its facility or facilities and could adversely affect such borrower's or lessee's ability to make debt or lease payments to us.

              In March 2010, the President signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which subsequently was amended by the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the "Affordable Care Act"). The Affordable Care Act is designed to expand access to affordable health insurance, contain health care costs, and institute a variety of health policy reforms. The provisions of the sweeping law may affect us directly, as well as impact our lessees and borrowers. While certain provisions, such as expanding the insured population, may positively impact the revenues of our lessees and borrowers, other provisions, particularly those intended to reduce federal health care spending, could have a negative impact on our lessees and borrowers. Among other things, the Affordable Care Act: reduces Medicare skilled nursing facility reimbursement by a so-called "productivity adjustment" based on economy-wide productivity gains beginning in fiscal year 2012; requires the development of a value-based purchasing program for Medicare skilled nursing facility services; establishes a national voluntary pilot program to bundle Medicare payments for hospital and post-acute services that could lead to changes in the delivery of post-acute services; and provides incentives to state Medicaid programs to promote community-based care as an alternative to institutional long term care services. The Affordable Care Act also includes provisions intended to expand public disclosure about nursing home ownership and operations, institute mandatory compliance and quality assurance programs, increase penalties for noncompliance, and expand fraud and abuse enforcement and penalty provisions that could impact our operators. In addition, the Affordable Care Act impacts both us and our lessees and borrowers as employers, including new requirements related to the health insurance we offer to our respective employees. Many aspects of the Affordable Care Act are being implemented through new regulations and subregulatory guidance. We cannot predict at this time what effect, if any, the various provisions of the Affordable Care Act will have on our lessees and borrowers or our business. There can be no assurances, however, that the Affordable Care Act will not adversely impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our lessees and borrowers, which subsequently could materially adversely impact our revenue and operations.

              In addition, comprehensiveAdditional reforms affecting the payment for and availability of health care services have been proposed at the state level and adopted by certain states. Congress and state legislatures can be expected to continue to review and assess alternative health care delivery systems and payment methodologies. In particular,methodologies along with other cost-control measures. For instance, under the federalterms of the Budget Control Act of 2011, was scheduled to trigger a total of $1.2 trillion in spending reductions in January 2013, divided between domestic and defense spending. Medicare provider payments are subject to sequestration, although reductions are capped at 2%. On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed into lawas modified by the American Taxpayer Relief Act, President Obama issued a


      sequestration order on March 1, 2013 that mandates a 2% cut to Medicare payments to providers and health plans. The cuts generally apply to Medicare fee-for-service claims with dates-of-service or dates-of-discharge on or after April 1, 2013. Under current law, as amended by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2012, which, among other things, delays2013, sequestration for two months in order to provide an additional opportunity forwill last through fiscal year 2023, although Congress and the President to agree onAdministration could enact alternative deficit reduction options. Such alternatives also could impact the Medicare and Medicaid programs.budget legislation at any time that would end or modify sequestration. These and other changes in


      the law, new interpretations of existing laws, or changes in payment methodologies may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by the government and other third party payors.

              Federal and State Health Care Cost Containment Measures Including Reductions in Reimbursement From Third Party Payors Such as Medicare and Medicaid Could Adversely Affect Us and The Ability of Our Tenants to Make Payments to Us.    The ability of our borrowers and lessees to generate revenue and profit determines the underlying value of that property to us. Revenues of our borrowers and skilled nursing property lessees are generally derived from payments for patient care. Sources of such payments include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, health care service plans, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider arrangements, self-insured employers, as well as the patients themselves.

              The health care industry continues to face increased government and private payor pressure on health care providers to control costs. Certain of these initiatives have had the result of limiting Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for nursing facility services. In particular, the establishment of a Medicare prospective payment system for skilled nursing facility services to replace the cost-based reimbursement system significantly reduced Medicare reimbursement to skilled nursing facility providers. While Congress subsequently took steps to mitigate the impact of the prospective payment system on skilled nursing facilities, other federal legislative and regulatory policies have been adopted and may continue to be proposed that would reduce Medicare and/or Medicaid payments to nursing facilities. Moreover, states are facing increasing budget pressures in light of the current economic conditions, prompting consideration and in some cases adoption of cuts in state Medicaid payments to providers. No assurances can be given that any additional Medicare or Medicaid legislation or regulatory policies adopted by the federal government or the states would not reduce Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement to nursing facilities or result in additional costs for operators of nursing facilities.

              Congress also has given states greater flexibility to expand access to home and community based services as an alternative to nursing facility services. These provisions could further increase state funding for home and community based services, while prompting states to cut funding for nursing facilities and homes for persons with disabilities. In light of continuing state Medicaid program reforms, budget cuts, and regulatory initiatives, no assurance can be given that the implementation of such regulations and reforms will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of our lessees and/or borrowers which, in turn, could affect their ability to meet their contractual obligations to us.

              We Could Incur More Debt.    We operate with a policy of incurring debt when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. We may incur additional debt by borrowing under our Unsecured Credit Agreementunsecured revolving line of credit or the uncommitted private shelf agreement, mortgaging properties we own and/or issuing debt securities in a public offering or in a private transaction. Accordingly, we could become more highly leveraged. The degree of leverage could have important consequences to stockholders, including affecting our ability to obtain, in the future, additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes and making us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally.

              We Could Fail to Collect Amounts Due Under Our Straight-line Rent Receivable Asset.    Straight-line accounting requires us to calculate the total rent we will receive as a fixed amount over the life of the


      lease and recognize that revenue evenly over that life. In a situation where a lease calls for fixed rental increases during the life of the lease, rental income recorded in the early years of a lease is higher than the actual cash rent received which creates an asset on the consolidated balance sheet called straight-line rent receivable. At some point during the lease, depending on the rent levels and terms, this reverses and the cash rent payments received during the later years of the lease are higher than the


      rental income recognized which reduces the straight-line rent receivable balance to zero by the end of the lease. We periodically assess the collectability of the straight-line rent receivable. If during our assessment we determined that we were unlikely to collect a portion or the entire straight-line rent receivable asset, we may provide a reserve against the previously recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for a portion or up to its full value that we estimate may not be recoverable.

              Our Assets May be Subject to Impairment Charges.    We periodically but not less than quarterly evaluate our real estate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, operator performance and legal structure. If we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset which could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and a non-cash impact on funds from operations in the period in which the write-off occurs.

              A Failure to Reinvest Cash Available to Us Could Adversely Affect Our Future Revenues and Our Ability to Increase Dividends to Stockholders; There is Considerable Competition in Our Market for Attractive Investments.    From time to time, we will have cash available from (1) proceeds of sales of shares of securities, (2) proceeds from new debt issuances, (3) principal payments on our mortgages and other investments, (4) sale of properties, and (5) funds from operations. We may reinvest this cash in health care investments and in accordance with our investment policies, repay outstanding debt or invest in qualified short term or long term investments. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. The competition for attractive investments negatively affects our ability to make timely investments on acceptable terms. Delays in acquiring properties or making loans will negatively impact revenues and perhaps our ability to increase distributions to our stockholders.

              Our Failure to Qualify as a REIT Would Have Serious Adverse Consequences to Our Stockholders.    We intend to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. We believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner which would allow us to qualify as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 1992. However, it is possible that we have been organized or have operated in a manner which would not allow us to qualify as a REIT, or that our future operations could cause us to fail to qualify. Qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must pay dividends to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% (95% for taxable years ending prior to January 1, 2001) of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains). Legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

              If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost qualification. If we lose our REIT status, our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders would be


      significantly reduced for each of the years involved. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to stockholders.

              Provisions in Our Articles of Incorporation May Limit Ownership of Shares of Our Capital Stock.    In order for us to qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last


      half of each taxable year. To ensure qualification under this test, our Articles of Incorporation provide that, subject to exceptions, no person may beneficially own more than 9.8% of outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock, including our common stock. Our Board of Directors may exempt a person from the 9.8% ownership limit upon such conditions as the Board of Directors may direct. However, our Board of Directors may not grant an exemption from the 9.8% ownership limit if it would result in the termination of our status as a REIT. Shares of capital stock in excess of the 9.8% ownership limitation that lack an applicable exemption may lose rights to dividends and voting, and may be subject to redemption. As a result of the limitations on ownership set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, acquisition of any shares of capital stock that would result in our disqualification as a REIT may be limited or void. The 9.8% ownership limitation also may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our capital stock.

              Our Real Estate Investments are Relatively Illiquid.    Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, tend to limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. All of our properties are "special purpose" properties that cannot be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Health care facilities that participate in Medicare or Medicaid must meet extensive program requirements, including physical plant and operational requirements, which are revised from time to time. Such requirements may include a duty to admit Medicare and Medicaid patients, limiting the ability of the facility to increase its private pay census beyond certain limits. Medicare and Medicaid facilities are regularly inspected to determine compliance, and may be excluded from the programs—in some cases without a prior hearing—for failure to meet program requirements. Transfers of operations of nursing homes and other health care-related facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate. Thus, if the operation of any of our properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of improvements or other factors such that our lessee or borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the lease or mortgage loan, the liquidation value of the property may be substantially less than the net book value or the amount owing on any related mortgage loan, than would be the case if the property were readily adaptable to other uses. The receipt of liquidation proceeds or the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the property or the replacement of the operator with a new operator licensed to manage the facility. In addition, certain significant expenditures associated with real estate investment, such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. Should such events occur, our income and cash flows from operations would be adversely affected.

              Our Remedies May Be Limited When Mortgage Loans Default.    To the extent we invest in mortgage loans, such mortgage loans may or may not be recourse obligations of the borrower and generally will not be insured or guaranteed by governmental agencies or otherwise. In the event of a default under such obligations, we may have to foreclose on the property underlying the mortgage or protect our interest by acquiring title to a property and thereafter make substantial improvements or repairs in order to maximize the property's investment potential. Borrowers may contest enforcement of foreclosure or other remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against such enforcement and/or bring claims for lender liability in response to actions to enforce mortgage obligations. If a borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the Bankruptcy Court may impose an automatic stay that would preclude us


      from enforcing foreclosure or other remedies against the borrower. Declines in the value of the property may prevent us from realizing an amount equal to our mortgage loan upon foreclosure.

              We are Subject to Risks and Liabilities in Connection with Properties Owned Through Limited Liability Companies and Partnerships.    In prior years, we had ownership interests in limited liability companies


      and partnerships. We may make additional investments through these ventures in the future. Partnership or limited liability company investments may involve risks such as the following:

        our partners or co-members might become bankrupt (in which event we and any other remaining general partners or members would generally remain liable for the liabilities of the partnership or limited liability company);

        our partners or co-members might at any time have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals;

        our partners or co-members may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including our policy with respect to maintaining our qualification as a REIT; and

        agreements governing limited liability companies and partnerships often contain restrictions on the transfer of a member's or partner's interest or "buy-sell" or other provisions which may result in a purchase or sale of the interest at a disadvantageous time or on disadvantageous terms.

              We will, however, generally seek to maintain sufficient control of our partnerships and limited liability companies to permit us to achieve our business objectives. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in partnerships or limited liability companies. The occurrence of one or more of the events described above could have a direct and adverse impact on us.

              Risks Associated with Property Development that Can Render a Project Less Profitable or Not Profitable, and, Under Certain Circumstances, Prevent Completion of Development Activities Undertaken.    Our business includes development of senior housing and long term care properties. We currently have fivesix parcels of land under development. Ground up development presents additional risk, including but not limited to the following:

        a development opportunity may be abandoned after expending significant resources resulting in the loss of deposits or failure to recover expenses already incurred;

        the development and construction costs of a project may exceed original estimates due to increased interest rates and higher materials, transportation, labor, leasing or other costs, which could make completion of the development project less profitable;

        construction and/or permanent financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all;

        the project may not be completed on schedule, which can result in increases in construction costs and debt service expenses as a result of a variety of factors that are beyond our control, including natural disasters, labor conditions, material shortages, regulatory hurdles, civil unrest and acts of war; and

        occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not meet expected levels and could be insufficient to make the property profitable.

              These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

              Changes to the Fair Value of Contingent Consideration to be Paid in Connection with Acquisitions May Result in Significant Fluctuations to Our Results to Operations.    In connection with acquiring senior housing and long term care properties, we have an established liability of $6.7 million as of December 31, 2012 representing our estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid (i.e. earn-out). The fair value of such contingent consideration is re-evaluated on a quarterly basis


      based on changes in our estimate of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. Any changes in our estimated fair value are recognized in our results of operations. Because contingent consideration is generally based on multiples of operating results of the acquired properties during a measurement period, changes to our estimate of projected operating results of the acquired property may have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.

      Item 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

              None.


      Item 2.    PROPERTIES

              Here and throughout this Form 10-K wherever we provide details of our properties' bed/unit count, the number of beds/units applies to skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living and memory care properties only. This number is based upon unit/bed counts shown on operating licenses provided to us by lessees/borrowers or units/beds as stipulated by lease/mortgage documents. We have found during the years that these numbers often differ, usually not materially, from units/beds in operation at any point in time. The differences are caused by such things as operators converting a patient/resident room for alternative uses, such as offices or storage, or converting a multi-patient room/unit into a single patient room/unit. We monitor our properties on a routine basis through site visits and reviews of current licenses. In an instance where such change would cause a de-licensing of beds or in our opinion impact the value of the property, we would take action against the lessee/borrower to preserve the value of the property/collateral.

              Owned Properties.    The following table sets forth certain information regarding our owned properties as of December 31, 20122013 (dollars amounts in thousands):

      Location
       No. of
      SNFs
       No. of
      ALFs
       No. of
      ROCs
       No. of
      UDPs
       No. of
      Schools
       No. of
      Beds/Units
       Encumbrances Remaining
      Lease
      Term(1)
       Gross
      Investment
        No. of
      SNFs
       No. of
      ALFs
       No. of
      ROCs
       No. of
      UDPs
       No. of
      Others
       No. of
      Beds/Units
       Encumbrances Remaining
      Lease
      Term(1)
       Gross
      Investment
       

      Alabama

       2  2   459 $ 43 $18,622  2  2   459 $ 31 $18,622 

      Arizona

       5 2    983  73 41,212  5 2    983  61 41,212 

      California

       2 2    508  95 48,720  2 2    508  83 48,720 

      Colorado

       3 8 1 1  692  122 56,960  2 9 1 (2)  705  110 67,416 

      Florida

       2 9 2   983  104 60,567  5 9    1,061  99 74,969 

      Georgia

       2 1    301  26 6,600  2 1    301  14 6,600 

      Idaho

        4    148  24 9,756   4    148  12 9,756 

      Indiana

        3    140  64 9,856   3    140  52 9,856 

      Iowa

       6 1 1   579  95 17,422  6 1 1   579  83 17,422 

      Kansas

       3 4  1  384  97 22,448  3 5    461  100 30,706 

      Kentucky

          1     4,770     (3)     10,631 

      Michigan

           (5)    1,163 

      Minnesota

           1   32 3,057      1   20 3,174 

      Mississippi

        1    62  108 9,400   1    62  96 9,400 

      Nebraska

        4    158  24 9,332   4    158  12 9,332 

      New Jersey

        4   1 205  157 70,667   4   1 205  145 70,667 

      New Mexico

       7     843  91 49,644  7     843  78 50,303 

      N. Carolina

        5    210  96 13,096   5    210  84 13,096 

      Ohio

       8 11    1,002  110 110,804  2 11    772  108 98,647 

      Oklahoma

        6    219  96 12,315   6    219  84 12,315 

      Oregon

       1 3    218  31 11,927  1 3    218  19 11,927 

      Pennsylvania

        3    199  87 18,040   3    199  75 18,040 

      S. Carolina

        3 2   339  97 19,800   3 2   339  85 19,800 

      Tennessee

       2     141  70 3,075  2     141  120 4,080 

      Texas

       24 14 1 2  4,141  127 215,849  25 14 1 (4)  4,171  114 223,607 

      Virginia

       3  1   500  112 29,052  3  1   500  113 29,052 

      Washington

       1 8    431 2,635 30 27,104  1 8    431 2,035 18 27,104 
                                            

      TOTAL

       71 96 10 5 2 13,845 $2,635(2) 104 $900,095  68 98 8  2 13,813 $2,035(6) 94 $937,617 
                                            
                         

      (1)
      Weighted average remaining months in lease term as of December 31, 2012.2013.
      (2)
      Includes three MC developments with a total 168 units.
      (3)
      Includes a SNF development with 143 beds.
      (4)
      Includes a combination ALF and MC development with 81 units.

      (5)
      Includes four parcels of land held-for-use.
      (6)
      Consists of $2,635$2,035 of tax-exempt bonds secured by five assisted living properties in Washington with 188 units. As of December 31, 20122013 our gross investment in properties encumbered by these bonds was $11,280.

              The following table sets forth certain information regarding our lease expirations for our owned properties as of December 31, 20122013 (dollars amounts in thousands):

      Year
       No. of
      SNFs
       No. of
      ALFs
       No. of
      ROCs
       No. of
      Schools
       No. of
      Beds/Units
       No. of
      Operators
       Annualized
      Rental
      Income(1)
       % of Annualized
      Rental Income
      Expiring
        No. of
      SNFs
       No. of
      ALFs
       No. of
      ROCs
       No. of
      Others
       No. of
      Beds/Units
       No. of
      Operators
       Annualized
      Rental
      Income(1)
       % of Annualized
      Rental Income
      Expiring
       

      2013

       1    112 1 $453 0.5%

      2014

       2 37 2  1,861 2 12,951 13.2% 2 37 2  1,861 2 13,924 14.1%

      2015

       6 2  1 374 3 2,539 2.6%  2  1 144 2 1,184 1.2%

      2016

       3    322 2 2,129 2.2% 4    434 3 2,644 2.7%

      2017

       1   1 60 2 1,615 1.6% 1   1 60 2 1,638 1.7%

      2018

       7 9 1  1,484 6 11,383 11.6% 4 9 1  1,296 5 10,872 11.0%

      2019

       3    613 1 1,596 1.6% 3    613 1 1,621 1.6%

      2020

       1 35   1,580 2 11,626 11.8% 1 35   1,580 2 11,818 11.9%

      2021

       30 7 4  4,395 6 22,243 22.6% 31 7 4  4,425 5 22,211 22.4%

      2022

       3  1  561 2 4,054 4.1% 1    121 1 572 0.6%

      2023

       8 3 1  1,300 5 10,547 10.6%

      Thereafter

       14 6 2  2,483 10 27,881 28.2% 13 5   1,979 4 21,960 22.2%
                                        

      TOTAL

       71 96 10 2 13,845 35 $98,470 100.0% 68 98 8 2 13,813 32(2)$98,991 100.0%
                                        
                       

      (1)
      Annualized rental income is the total rent over the life of the lease recognizerecognized evenly over that life for leases in place as of December 31, 2012,2013, excluding amortization of lease inducement costs.
      (2)
      Does not include one operator of a property under development as the term of the lease will be set upon completion of the project.

              Mortgage Loans.    The following table sets forth certain information regarding our mortgage loans as of December 31, 20122013 (dollars amounts in thousands):

      Location
       No. of
      SNFs
       No. of
      ALFs
       No. of
      ROCs
       No. of
      Beds/ Units
       Interest
      Rate
       Average
      Months to
      Maturity
       Original
      Face Amount
      of Mortgage
      Loans
       Gross
      Investment
       Current
      Annual Debt
      Service(1)
        No. of
      SNFs
       No. of
      ALFs
       No. of
      ROCs
       No. of
      Beds/ Units
       Interest
      Rate
       Average
      Months to
      Maturity
       Original
      Face Amount
      of Mortgage Loans
       Gross
      Investment
       Current
      Annual Debt
      Service(1)
       

      California

         1 173 11.38% 27 $4,700 $2,862 $577    1 173 11.50% 15 $4,700 $2,602 $580 

      Florida

       3 1  310 11.00%-11.80% 23 7,850 7,235 975  3 1  310 11.13%-11.90% 11 7,850 7,111 983 

      Michigan

       15   2,092 9.53% 358 124,387 124,387 11,854 

      Missouri

       2   190 10.63%-11.10% 61 3,000 3,604 650  2   190 10.76%-11.23% 49 3,000 3,343 653 

      Oklahoma

             1,300 385(2)  

      Pennsylvania

        1  70 7.00% 24 5,100 5,100 362   1  70 7.00% 12 5,100 5,100 362 

      Texas

       9 6  1,208 10.10%-13.45% 60 22,715 16,258 2,833  9 6  1,208 10.25%-13.57% 48 23,815 15,144 2,851 

      Utah

       1   84 10.45% 83 1,400 1,302 168  1   84 10.60% 71 1,400 1,271 169 

      Washington

       1   104 13.50% 46 1,700 716 236  1   104 13.63% 34 1,700 567 237 

      Wisconsin

       1   106 9.17% 119 2,619 2,619 240  1   106 10.10% 107 2,619 7,590 755 
                                          

      TOTAL

       17 8 1 2,245   50 $50,384 $40,081 $6,041  32 8 1 4,337   279 $174,571 $167,115 $18,444 
                                          
                         

      (1)
      Includes principal and interest payments.
      (2)
      Represents a mortgage loan secured by land which was fully reserved during 2010.

      Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

              We are from time to time a party to various general and professional liability claims and lawsuits asserted against the lessees or borrowers of our properties, which in our opinion are not singularly or in the aggregate material to our results of operations or financial condition. These types of claims and lawsuits may include matters involving general or professional liability, which we believe under applicable legal principles are not our responsibility as a non-possessory landlord or mortgage holder. We believe that these matters are the responsibility of our lessees and borrowers pursuant to general legal principles and pursuant to insurance and indemnification provisions in the applicable leases or mortgages. We intend to continue to vigorously defend such claims.

      Item 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

              Not applicable



      PART II

      Item 5.    MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

      Market Information

              Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "LTC". Set forth below are the high and low reported sale prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE for each of the periods indicated.


       2012 2011  2013 2012 

       High Low High Low  High Low High Low 

      First quarter

       $32.82 $30.13 $29.48 $27.01  $40.80 $35.58 $32.82 $30.13 

      Second quarter

       $36.42 $30.96 $30.14 $26.51  $48.69 $36.12 $36.42 $30.96 

      Third quarter

       $37.93 $31.65 $28.85 $20.41  $41.84 $34.30 $37.93 $31.65 

      Fourth quarter

       $35.32 $30.48 $31.38 $23.75  $40.68 $34.88 $35.32 $30.48 

      Holders of Record

              As of December 31, 20122013 we had approximately 307281 stockholders of record of our common stock.

      Dividend Information

              We declared and paid total cash distributions on common stock as set forth below:


       Declared Paid  Declared Paid 

       2012 2011 2012 2011  2013 2012 2013 2012 

      First quarter

       $0.435 $0.42 $0.435 $0.42  $0.465 $0.435 $0.465 $0.435 

      Second quarter

       $0.435 $0.42 $0.435 $0.42  $0.465 $0.435 $0.465 $0.435 

      Third quarter

       $0.455 $0.42 $0.455 $0.42  $0.465 $0.455 $0.465 $0.455 

      Fourth quarter

       $0.465 $0.42 $0.465 $0.42  $0.510 $0.465 $0.510 $0.465 
                        

       $1.790 $1.68 $1.790 $1.68  $1.905 $1.790 $1.905 $1.790 
                        
               

              We intend to distribute to our stockholders an amount at least sufficient to satisfy the distribution requirements of a REIT. Cash flows from operating activities available for distribution to stockholders will be derived primarily from interest and rental payments from our real estate investments. All distributions will be made subject to approval of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors deem relevant. In order to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment accorded to REITs by Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, we are required to make distributions to holders of our shares equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. (See "Annual Distribution Requirements" beginning on page 16..)


      Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

              We had a BoardThe number of Directors authorized share repurchase program enabling us to repurchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our equity securities, includingCommon Stock purchased and the average prices paid per share for each month in the quarter ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

      Period
       Total Number
      of Shares
      Purchased(1)
       Average
      Price
      Paid per
      Share
       Total Number
      of Shares
      Purchased as
      Part of
      Publicly
      Announced
      Plan(2)
       Maximum
      Number of
      Shares that May
      Yet Be
      Purchased
      Under the Plan
       

      October 1 - October 31, 2013

         $     

      November 1 - November 30, 2013

         $     

      December 1 - December 31, 2013

        6,325 $36.13     
                  

      Total

        6,325         
                  

      (1)
      During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we acquired shares of common and preferred stock on the open market. During 2012, this authorization was terminatedheld by our Boardemployees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.
      (2)
      No shares were purchased as part of Directors.

      publicly announced plans or programs.

      Stock Performance Graph

              The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (or NAREIT), an organization representing U.S. REITs and publicly traded real estate companies, classifies a company with 75% or more of assets directly or indirectly in the equity ownership of real estate as an equity REIT. In 2012,2013, our equity ownership of real estate assets was more than 75%.

              This graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from December 31, 20072008 to December 31, 20122013 with the cumulative stockholder total return of (1) the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and (2) the NAREIT Equity REIT Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 20072008 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends.


      Total Return Performance


       Period Ending  Period Ending 
      Index
       12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12  12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 

      LTC Properties, Inc.

       100.00 86.30 122.46 136.48 159.37 191.91  100.00 141.90 158.14 184.67 222.38 234.75 

      NAREIT Equity

       100.00 62.27 79.70 101.99 110.45 130.39  100.00 127.99 163.78 177.36 209.39 214.56 

      S&P 500

       100.00 63.00 79.68 91.68 93.61 108.59  100.00 126.46 145.51 148.59 172.37 228.19 

              The stock performance depicted in the above graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

              The stock performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.


      Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

              The following table of selected financial information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


       2012 2011 2010 2009 2008  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 

       (In thousands, except per share amounts)
        (In thousands, except per share amounts)
       

      Operating information:

                  

      Total revenues

       $94,033 $85,165 $74,302 $69,376 $68,839  $104,974 $92,482 $83,618 $72,740 $67,808 

      Income from continuing operations

       51,311 49,542 45,595 44,248 43,080  55,405 50,306 48,620 44,851 43,538 

      Income allocated to non-controlling interests(1)

       37 191 191 296 307   37 191 191 296 

      Income allocated to participating securities

       377 342 230 139 159  383 377 342 230 139 

      Income allocated to preferred stockholders(2)

       3,273 9,078 16,045 14,515 14,401  3,273 3,273 9,078 16,045 14,515 

      Net income available to common stockholders

       47,640 39,832 29,587 29,410 28,417  54,159 47,640 39,832 29,587 29,410 

      Per share information:

        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

                  

      Basic

       $1.58 $1.37 $1.19 $1.27 $1.23  $1.56 $1.54 $1.34 $1.16 $1.24 
                            
                 

      Diluted

       $1.57 $1.37 $1.19 $1.27 $1.23  $1.56 $1.54 $1.33 $1.16 $1.24 
                 
                            

      Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

                  

      Basic

       $1.58 $1.36 $1.21 $1.27 $1.24  $1.64 $1.58 $1.36 $1.21 $1.27 
                            
                 

      Diluted

       $1.57 $1.36 $1.21 $1.27 $1.24  $1.63 $1.57 $1.36 $1.21 $1.27 
                 
                            

      Common stock distributions declared

       $1.79 $1.68 $1.58 $1.56 $1.56  $1.91 $1.79 $1.68 $1.58 $1.56 
                            
                 

      Common stock distributions paid

       $1.79 $1.68 $1.58 $1.56 $1.56  $1.91 $1.79 $1.68 $1.58 $1.56 
                 
                            

      Balance sheet information:

                  

      Total assets

       $789,592 $647,097 $561,264 $490,593 $506,053  $931,410 $789,592 $647,097 $561,264 $490,593 

      Total debt(3)

       303,935(5) 159,200(5) 91,430(5) 25,410(4) 36,753  278,835(4) 303,935(5) 159,200(5) 91,430(5) 25,410 

      (1)
      Decrease due to the conversion of 112,588 partnership units 67,294 partnership units and 22,00067,294 partnership units in 2012 2009 and 2008,2009, respectively. During 2011 and 2010, there were no partnership conversions. During 2013, we had no limited partners.
      (2)
      Income allocated to preferred stockholders includes the following(dollar amounts in thousands):

        
       2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 
       

      Preferred stock dividends

       $3,273 $5,512 $13,662 $15,141 $15,390 
       

      Preferred stock redemption charge

          3,566  2,383     
       

      Allocation of income from preferred stock buyback

              (626) (989)
                   
       

      Total income allocated to preferred stockholders

       $3,273 $9,078 $16,045 $14,515 $14,401 
                   
        
       2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 
       

      Preferred stock dividends

       $3,273 $3,273 $5,512 $13,662 $15,141 
       

      Preferred stock redemption charge

            3,566  2,383   
       

      Allocation of income from preferred stock buyback

                (626)
                   
       
       

      Total income allocated to preferred stockholders

       $3,273 $3,273 $9,078 $16,045 $14,515 
                   
       
       
                   
      (3)
      Includes bank borrowings, senior unsecured notes, mortgage loans payable and bonds payable.
      (4)
      LowerDecrease due to the sale of 4,025,000 shares of common stock resulting in net proceeds of $171,365 that were used to pay off during 2009 of three mortgage loans totaling $23.9 million secured by 11 assisted living properties partially offset by outstanding bank borrowings of $13.5 million.down debt, fund acquisitions, development and general corporate purposes.
      (5)
      Increase due to the sale of senior unsecured term notes and additional bank borrowing to fund real estate acquisitions.

      Item 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      Executive Overview

      Business

              We are a self-administered health care real estate investment trust (or REIT) that invests primarily in senior housing and long term care properties through acquisitions, development, mortgage loans and other investments. We conduct and manage our business as one operating segment, rather than multiple operating segments, for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. In 2012,2013, senior housing and long term care properties, which include skilled nursing properties, assisted living properties, independent living properties, memory care properties and combinations thereof comprised approximately 98.7%98.8% of our investment portfolio. The following table summarizes our real estate investment portfolio as of December 31, 20122013(dollar amounts in thousands):


        
        
       Twelve Months
      Ended
      December 31, 2012
        
        
       Number of   
        
       Twelve Months
      Ended
      December 31, 2013
        
        
       Number of 
      Type of Property
       Gross
      Investments
       Percentage of
      Investments
       Rental
      Income
       Interest
      Income(1)
       Percentage
      of
      Revenues(2)
       Number
      of
      Properties(3)
       SNF
      Beds(4)
       ALF
      Units(4)
        Gross
      Investments
       Percentage of
      Investments
       Rental
      Income
       Interest
      Income(1)
       Percentage
      of
      Revenues(2)
       Number
      of
      Properties(3)
       SNF
      Beds(4)
       ALF
      Units(4)
       

      Skilled Nursing(5)

       $463,319 49.3%$44,823 $2,870 51.2% 88 10,072   $611,160 55.3%$50,046 $4,881 52.6% 100 12,217  

      Assisted Living

       392,157 41.7% 34,182 2,284 39.2% 104  4,713  412,024 37.3% 41,641 1,103 40.9% 106  4,852 

      Range of Care

       55,732 5.9% 6,996 342 7.9% 11 913 392  46,509 4.2% 4,904 314 5.0% 9 733 348 

      Under Development(5)(6)

       16,642 1.8%   0.0%     21,432 2.0%   0.0%    

      Schools

       12,326 1.3% 1,572  1.7% 2   

      Other(7)

       13,607 1.2% 1,575  1.5% 2   
                                        

      Totals

       $940,176 100.0%$87,573 $5,496 100.0% 205 10,985 5,105  $1,104,732 100.0%$98,166 $6,298 100.0% 217 12,950 5,200 
                                        
                       

      (1)
      Includes interest income from mortgage loans.
      (2)
      Includes rental income and interest income from mortgage loans.
      (3)
      We have investments in 2930 states leased or mortgaged to 4340 different operators.
      (4)
      SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
      (5)
      Includes a newmortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.
      (6)
      Includes three MC development with 60 units and two new ALF developments with a total of 158168 units, a new 143-bedcombination ALF and MC development with 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
      (7)
      Includes two school properties and a 120-bed SNF redevelopment project.four parcels of land held-for-use.

              As of December 31, 20122013 we had $740.8$884.4 million in carrying value of net real estate investment, consisting of $701.5$718.9 million or 94.7%81.3% invested in owned and leased properties and $39.3$165.4 million or 5.3%18.7% invested in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages.

              For the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, rental income and interest income from mortgage loans represented 93.1%93.5% and 5.8%6.0%, respectively, of total gross revenues. In most instances, our lease structure contains fixed or estimable annual rental escalations, which are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease period. Certain leases have annual rental escalations that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index and/or changes in the gross operating revenues of the property. This revenue is not recognized until the appropriate contingencies have been resolved. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 we recorded $4.0 million, $3.3 million $3.7 million, and $3.8$3.7 million, respectively, in straight-line rental income. Also during 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 we recorded $37,000, $38,000 $46,000 and $0.8 million,$46,000, respectively, of straight-line rent receivable reserve. Assuming noDuring the fourth quarter of 2013, we wrote-off a $0.9 million straight-line rent receivable balance related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new leased investments with fixed annual rental escalations are added to our portfolio,lessee. For the year 2013 straight-line rental income forremaining leases in place at December 31, 2012 are projected to remain at the 2012 amount of $3.3 million. The straight-line rental income remains constant due to the new master lease entered into during the fourth quarter of 2012. Our cash rental income is projected to increase from $85.0 million in 2012 to $95.4 million in 2013, assuming no modification replacement or extensionreplacement of existing leases and no new leased investments are added to our portfolio.portfolio, we currently expect that straight-line rental income will decrease from $3.9 million in 2013 to $2.2 million for projected annual 2014 and, conversely, our cash


      rental income is projected to increase from $96.0 million in 2013 to $97.5 million for projected annual 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we received $85.0$96.0 million of cash rental revenue and recorded $0.7 million of lease inducement costs. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the straight-line rent receivable balance, net of


      reserves, for continuing and discontinued operations on the consolidated balance sheet was $27.0$29.8 million and $23.8$26.8 million, respectively. Many of our existing leases contain renewal options that could, in the future, renew above or below current rent rates. For the year ended December 31, 20122013, we renewed threefive leases at rates similar to existing rates by either i) amending the existing rate by 1) replacing one expiredlease to extend the term and assign the lease to a new operator, ii) combining individual leases into a master lease with no change to the term, iii) combing an individual lease into a newmaster lease and 2) combinedextending the term, iv) amending a lease to extend the term or v) combining two othermaster leases into one master lease. The operators of these renewed leases remainedlease with no change to the same.term.

              Our primary objectives are to create, sustain and enhance stockholder equity value and provide current income for distribution to stockholders through real estate investments in senior housing and long term care properties managed by experienced operators. To meet these objectives, we attempt to invest in properties that provide opportunity for additional value and current returns to our stockholders and diversify our investment portfolio by geographic location, operator, property type and form of investment. We opportunistically consider investments in health care facilities in related businesses where the business model is similar to our existing model and the opportunity provides an attractive expected return. Consistent with this strategy, we pursue, from time to time, opportunities for potential acquisitions and investments, with due diligence and negotiations often at different stages of development at any particular time.

        With respect to skilled nursing properties, we attempt to invest in properties that do not have to rely on a high percentage of private-pay patients. We prefer to invest in a property that has significant market presence in its community and where state certificate of need and/or licensing procedures limit the entry of competing properties.

        For assisted living and independent living investments we have attempted to diversify our portfolio both geographically and across product levels.

        Memory care facilities offer specialized options for seniors with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. Purpose built, free-standing memory care facilities offer an attractive alternative for private-pay residents affected by memory loss in comparison to other accommodations that typically have been provided within a secured unit of an assisted living or skilled nursing facility. These facilities offer dedicated care and specialized programming for various conditions relating to memory loss in a secured environment that is typically smaller in scale and more residential in nature than traditional assisted living facilities. Residents require a higher level of care and more assistance with activities of daily living than in assisted living facilities. Therefore, these facilities have staff available 24 hours a day to respond to the unique needs of their residents.

              Substantially all of our revenues and sources of cash flows from operations are derived from operating lease rentals and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. Our investments in owned properties and mortgage loans and owned properties represent our primary source of liquidity to fund distributions and are dependent upon the performance of the operators on their lease and loan obligations and the rates earned thereon. To the extent that the operators experience operating difficulties and are unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. To mitigate this risk, we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of health care facility and operator. Our monitoring process includes periodic review of financial statements for each facility, periodic review of operator credit, scheduled property inspections and review of covenant compliance.


              In addition to our monitoring and research efforts, we also structure our investments to help mitigate payment risk. Some operating leases and loans are credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit. In addition, operating leases are typically structured as master leases and loans are generally cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with other loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the operator and its affiliates.


              Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we anticipate making additional investments in health care related properties. New investments are generally funded from cash on hand, temporary borrowings under our unsecured revolving line of credit and internally generated cash flows. Our investments generate internal cash from rent and interest receipts and principal payments on mortgage loans receivable. Permanent financing for future investments, which replaces funds drawn under our unsecured revolving line of credit, is expected to be provided through a combination of public and private offerings of debt and equity securities and secured and unsecured debt financing. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates. Changes in the capital markets' environment may impact the availability of cost-effective capital.

              We believe our business model has enabled and will continue to enable us to maintain the integrity of our property investments, including in response to financial difficulties that may be experienced by operators. Traditionally, we have taken a conservative approach to managing our business, choosing to maintain liquidity and exercise patience until favorable investment opportunities arise.

              At December 31, 2012,2013, we had $7.2$6.8 million of cash on hand, $124.5$219.0 million available under our $240.0 million Unsecured Credit Agreement,unsecured revolving line of credit, and $100.0$30.0 million available under the uncommitted private shelf agreement. Also, ourSubsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $11.5 million and, therefore, have $207.5 million available under or unsecured revolving line of credit. We also have the potential ability to access the capital markets through the issuance of $64.6 million of common stock under our Amended Equity Distribution Agreement and through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities under our $167.6$800.0 million effective shelf registration. As a result, we believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations and development commitments, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and finance some future investments should we determine such future investments are financially feasible.

      Key Transactions

              Owned Properties.    The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2012 (dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing(1)

       $79,100 $275 $79,375  4  522 

      Assisted Living(2)

        81,987  285  82,272  5  266 

      Land(3)

        5,663  207  5,870     
                  

      Totals

       $166,750 $767 $167,517  9  788 
                  

      (1)
      Includes twoDuring 2013, we purchased a 120-bed skilled nursing property in Florida for $14.4 million. The property was included in a master lease at an incremental initial cash yield of 8.75%. The operator previously leased four properties with a total of 234 beds located in Texas and two skilled nursing596 beds/units from us. The new master lease contains all five properties with a total of 288 beds located in Ohio.716 beds/units and has a GAAP yield of 10.7%. The weighted average GAAPinitial lease term is 10 years with two 5-year renewal options and annual rent is 10.3%.
      (2)
      Includes two properties with a totalescalations of 100 units located in Colorado and three properties with a total of 166 units located in New Jersey. The weighted average GAAP rent is 8.1%2.2%.
      (3)
      We purchased four vacant parcels of land in the following states: Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky and Texas. Simultaneous with the purchase, During 2013, we entered into lease agreements and development commitments in an amount not to exceed $49,702 to fundcompleted the construction of a memory care property with 60 units and two assisted living properties with a total of 158 units and one skilled nursing property with 143 beds. Rents due under the lease will begin upon the earlier of project completion or the improvement deadline specified in the lease. The weighted average initial rent rate is 9.1%.

              The following table summarizes our investment commitments and year to date funding on our development, redevelopment, renovation and expansion projects(excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Investment
      Commitment
       2012
      Funding(2)
       Total
      Funded
       Remaining
      Commitment
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $36,094 $8,310 $9,204 $26,890  6  759 

      Assisted Living(1)

        40,927  8,242  8,242  32,685  6  458 

      Range of Care

        739  66  739    2  211 
                    

      Totals

       $77,760 $16,618(3)$18,185 $59,575  14  1,428 
                    

      (1)
      Includes the developmentopened of a 60-unit memory care property for $9,817in Colorado, a 120-bed skilled nursing property in Texas and twoa 77-unit combination assisted living and memory care combinationproperty in Kansas. The new 120-bed skilled nursing property replaces a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio.

              During 2013, we entered into development commitments totaling $19.6 million with an existing operator to fund the purchase of land and construction of two free-standing memory care properties forwith a total of $16,385,108 units in Colorado. In conjunction with such commitments, we closed on two parcels of land for an aggregate purchase price of $2.1 million which were simultaneously added to the expansionexisting master lease agreement with the operator. Rent at an initial annual rate of two assisted living properties for a total $14,600 and9.25% will commence upon the renovation of a 140-unit independent living property for $125.

      (2)
      Includes acquired land of $5,663 and excludes $134 of capital improvement funding.
      (3)
      Subsequent torespective project's completion date (but in no event later than December 31, 2012,2014) and be calculated based on the land purchase price and construction costs funded for each property plus 9.0% compounded on the land purchase price and each amount funded under the commitments. Also, during 2013, we funded $2,972entered into a pipeline agreement with this same operator whereby we have the opportunity


      to finance any senior housing development projects or acquisitions originated by the operator through May 2018 (unless earlier terminated as provided for therein) with provisions limiting, among other things, to five the number of development projects the operator may have under investment commitments.

      construction at any time. Any such projects or opportunities financed by us pursuant to the agreement will be added to the parties' master lease with the then remaining term extended by 10 years at initial lease rates estimated to range from 9.0% to 10.5% with annual escalations of 2.5%.

              Mortgage Loans.    During 2012,2013, we originatedfunded a $5.1$124.4 million two-year interest-only bridge loan.mortgage loan with a third-party operator, Prestige Healthcare, secured by 15 properties with a total of 2,092 skilled nursing beds in Michigan. The loan is secured byfor a 70-unit assisted living property in Pennsylvaniaterm of 30 years and bears interest at 7.0% increasing9.53% for five years, escalating annually thereafter by 1.5%2.25%. WePayments are interest-only for three years, after which the borrower will make interest payments along with annual principal payments of $1.0 million. The loan agreement provides for additional forward commitments of $12.0 million for capital improvements at 9.41% for the first twelve months. The loan agreement also originatedprovides, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, for additional loan proceeds of up to $40.0 million with such proceeds limited to $10.0 million per twelve months.

              The borrower has a $10.6 million mortgageone-time option between the third and constructiontwelfth years to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan securedbalance without penalty. Exclusively for the purposes of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by an operational skilled nursing propertyus into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from portfolio of properties securing the loan. If the prepayment option is exercised and timely concluded, the borrower forfeits its opportunity to access any additional loan proceeds. Additionally, under certain circumstances, including a vacant parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement facility will be constructed. The term is 10 years and interest is 9.0% increasing 25 basis points annually. The agreement gives uschange in regulatory environment, we have the rightoption to purchase the replacement facility for $13.5 million during an 18 month period beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. If the purchase option is exercised, the replacement facility will be added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option is exercised. As of December 31, 2012, we funded $2.6 million of loan proceeds and we have a remaining commitment of $8.0 million on this mortgage and construction loan. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we funded $0.9 million under this mortgage and construction loan and we have a remaining commitment of $7.1 million.properties.

              Bank Borrowings.    During 2012, we amended our Unsecured Credit Agreement increasing the commitment to $240.0 million with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $350.0 million. Additionally, the drawn pricing was decreased by 25 basis points, the undrawn pricing was decreased by 10 basis points and the maturity of the facility was extended for one additional year to May 25, 2016. The amendment also provides for a one-year extension option at our discretion, subject to customary conditions. Based on our leverage ratios during 2012, the amended facility provides for interest annually at LIBOR plus 125 basis points and the unused commitment fee was 25 basis points. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we anticipate that the annual interest will increase to LIBOR plus 150 basis points and 30 basis points for the unused commitment fee based on our leverage ratios at December 31, 2012. Financial covenants contained in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, which are measured quarterly, require us to maintain, among other things:

        (i)
        a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value not greater than 0.5 to 1.0;

        (ii)
        a ratio of secured debt to total asset value not greater than 0.35 to 1.0;

        (iii)
        a ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset pool not greater than 0.6 to 1.0; and

        (iv)
        a ratio of EBITDA, as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, to fixed charges not less than 1.50 to 1.0.

              Senior Unsecured Notes.    During the 2012,2013, we sold 12-year$70.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.99% senior unsecured notes in the aggregate amountdue November 20, 2021 to affiliates and managed accounts of $85.8 million to a group of institutional investors in a private placement transaction.Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (individually and collectively, "Prudential"). The notes bear interest at 5.0%,an annual fixed rate of 3.99% and mature on July 19, 2024in 8 years with interest-only payments in the first two years and have scheduled annual principal pay downs of $17.2 million in years 8 through 12.amortization thereafter. We used a portion of the proceeds to pay down our Unsecured Credit Agreementunsecured revolving line of credit.

              Equity.    During 2013, we sold 4,025,000 shares of common stock at a price of $44.50 per share, before fees and costs of $7.7 million, in a public offering. The net proceeds of $171.4 million were used the remaining proceedsto pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving line of credit, to fund acquisitions.acquisitions and our current development commitments and general corporate purposes.

      Key Performance Indicators, Trends and Uncertainties

              We utilize several key performance indicators to evaluate the various aspects of our business. These indicators are discussed below and relate to concentration risk and credit strength. Management uses these key performance indicators to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results in making operating decisions and for budget planning purposes.

              Concentration Risk.    We evaluate by gross investment our concentration risk in terms of asset mix, investment mix, operator mix and geographic mix. Concentration risk is valuable to understand what portion of our investments could be at risk if certain sectors were to experience downturns. Asset mix measures the portion of our investments that are real property or mortgage loans. In order to qualify as an equity REIT, at least 75 percent of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items and government securities. Investment mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our various property types. Operator mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five operators. Geographic mix measures the portion of our investment that relate to our top five states.


              The following table reflects our recent historical trends of concentration risk(gross investment, in thousands):


       Period Ended  Period Ended 

       12/31/12 9/30/12 6/30/12 3/31/12 12/31/11  12/31/13 9/30/13 6/30/13 3/31/13 12/31/12 

      Asset mix:

                  

      Real property

       $900,095 $805,759 $743,297 $740,951 $725,031  $937,617 $911,096 $913,042 $906,582 $900,095 

      Loans receivable

       40,081 49,141 50,246 53,282 54,002  167,115 41,079 39,668 40,142 40,081 

      Investment mix:

        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Skilled nursing properties(1)

       $463,319 $461,915 $402,093 $404,721 $389,458  $611,160 $470,008 $478,751 $478,311 $475,873 

      Assisted living properties(1)

       392,157 320,253 320,368 320,481 320,591  412,024 409,285 406,785 402,913 399,391 

      Range of care properties

       55,732 55,793 55,851 55,908 55,898  46,509 46,577 46,643 46,707 46,769 

      Under development(1)

       16,642 4,671 2,995 894 894  21,432 13,861 8,087 6,349 5,817 

      Schools

       12,326 12,268 12,236 12,229 12,192 

      Other(2)(5)

       13,607 12,444 12,444 12,444 12,326 

      Operator mix:

        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Prestige Healthcare(3)(5)

       $137,739 $ $ $ $ 

      Senior Care Centers, LLC(4)

       114,539 114,539 114,539 114,539 114,539 

      Extendicare & ALC

       $88,034 $88,034 $88,034 $88,034 $88,034  88,034 88,034 88,034 88,034 88,034 

      Juniper Communities, LLC

       87,088      87,088 87,088 87,088 87,088 87,088 

      Preferred Care(1)

       84,292 84,425 85,075 85,245 88,309 

      Brookdale Communities

       84,210 84,210 84,210 84,210 84,210  84,219 84,216 84,212 84,211 84,210 

      Senior Care Centers, LLC(2)

       63,698 63,698 63,698 57,198 38,500 

      Remaining operators

       532,854 534,533 472,526 479,546 479,980  593,113 578,298 578,837 572,852 566,305 

      Geographic mix:

        
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Texas

       $232,106 $229,062 $222,989 $223,245 $207,760  $238,750 $238,036 $236,100 $233,865 $232,106 

      Michigan(3)(5)

       125,550     

      Ohio

       110,804 110,804 56,804 56,804 56,804  98,647 98,647(6) 110,804 110,804 110,804 

      Florida

       82,079(7) 67,710 67,742 67,772 67,802 

      New Jersey

       70,667 12,195 12,195 12,195 12,195  70,668 70,667 70,667 70,667 70,667 

      Florida

       67,802 67,830 67,859 70,150 70,217 

      Colorado

       56,960 31,145 29,849 27,816 27,816 

      Remaining states

       401,837 403,864 403,847 404,023 404,241  489,038 477,115 467,397 463,616 458,797 

      (1)
      Preferred Care, Inc. (or Preferred Care) leases 22 skilled nursing and two rangeDuring 2013, we completed the construction of a 60-unit memory care properties under two master leases and oneproperty, a 120-bed skilled nursing property underand a separate lease agreement. In addition, they operate four skilledcombination assisted living and memory care property with 77 units. Accordingly, these properties were reclassified from "Under development" to either "Skilled nursing properties securing four mortgage loans receivable that we have with unrelated third parties. They also operate one skilled nursing facility under a sub-lease with another lessee we have which is not included inproperty" or "Assisted living property," depending on the Preferred Care operator mix.property type, for all periods presented.
      (2)
      Includes two school properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.
      (3)
      During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we funded a $124,387 mortgage loan with Prestige Healthcare secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,092 beds in Michigan.
      (4)
      During 2013, we entered into an amended and restated master lease agreement with Senior Care Centers, LLC (or Senior Care) also operatesto include four skilled nursing properties under a sub-lease with another lessee which is not include in thewere previously operated by and subleased to Senior Care but was not included in Senior Care's operator mix. Accordingly, the four skilled nursing properties were reclassified from "Remaining operators" to "Senior Care Center, LLC" operator mix for all periods presented.
      (5)
      During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we purchased four parcels of land located in Michigan. These parcels of land are located adjacent to properties securing the Prestige Healthcare mortgage loan and are managed by Prestige Healthcare.
      (6)
      Decrease due to the sale of six skilled nursing properties with a total of 230 beds.
      (7)
      During the fourth quarter of December 31, 2013, we purchased a 120-bed skilled nursing property in Florida for $14,402.

              In January 2014, we announced that we will not be renewing leases that will expire on December 31, 2014 with Extendicare and ALC covering 37 assisted living properties. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, this portfolio totaled approximately $11.0 million or 10.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. There can be no assurance that we will be able to re-lease these communities on a timely basis, if at all, or that the new rents will be the same as the current rents.


              Credit Strength.    We measure our credit strength both in terms of leverage ratios and coverage ratios. Our leverage ratios include debt to gross asset value and debt to market capitalization. The leverage ratios indicate how much of our consolidated balance sheet capitalization is related to long term obligations. Our coverage ratios include interest coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio. The coverage ratios indicate our ability to service interest and fixed charges (interest plus preferred dividends). The coverage ratios are based on adjusted earnings before gain on sale of real estate, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (or Adjusted EBITDA). Leverage ratios and coverage ratios are widely used by investors, analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and


      investment recommendations of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends for our credit strength measures:

      Balance Sheet Metrics


       Year Ended Quarter Ended  Year Ended Quarter Ended 

       12/31/12 12/31/12 9/30/12 6/30/12 3/31/12 12/31/11  12/31/13 12/31/13 9/30/13 6/30/13 3/31/13 12/31/12 

      Debt to gross asset value

       30.8% 30.8%(1) 24.8%(1) 20.3%(6) 20.9%(1) 19.3% 24.2% 24.2%(1) 17.8% 17.8%(6) 30.6%(9) 30.8%

      Debt & preferred stock to gross asset value

       34.7% 34.7%(1) 29.1%(1) 24.8%(6) 25.5%(1) 24.0% 27.6% 27.6%(1) 21.5% 21.4%(6) 34.5%(9) 34.7%

      Debt to market capitalization ratio

       21.4% 21.4%(2) 18.1%(1) 13.0%(7) 14.8%(1) 14.0% 18.0% 18.0%(2) 12.1%(4) 11.9%(7) 19.1%(10) 21.4%

      Debt & preferred stock to market capitalization ratio

       24.2% 24.2%(2) 21.3%(1) 15.9%(7) 18.0%(1) 17.4% 20.5% 20.5%(2) 14.6%(4) 14.3%(7) 21.6%(10) 24.2%

      Interest coverage ratio(9)

       8.4x 7.4x(3) 7.2x(5) 10.2x(8) 9.9x 9.9x

      Fixed charge coverage ratio(9)

       6.3x 5.7x(4) 5.6x(5) 7.3x(8) 7.1x(8) 7.0x

      Interest coverage ratio(12)

       8.1x 8.3x(3) 9.1x(5) 8.2x(8) 7.1x(11) 7.4x

      Fixed charge coverage ratio(12)

       6.3x 6.5x(3) 6.9x(5) 6.3x(8) 5.6x(11) 5.7x

      (1)
      Increase primarily due to the increase in outstanding debt due to acquisitions.
      (2)
      Increase primarily duethe sale of senior unsecured notes to the increase in bank borrowings due to acquisitionsfund investments partially offset by the increase in market capitalization.gross asset value from acquisitions, additional development and capital improvement funding.
      (3)
      Increase primarily due to the decrease in interest expense caused by recording capitalized interest on the funding of construction projects and the decrease in depreciation due to a prior quarter one-time depreciation adjustment to reclassify a property from held-for-sale to held-for use, partially offset by increased income due to rental income from acquisitions.
      (4)(2)
      Increase due to the decreaseincrease in interest expense caused by recording capitalized interest onoutstanding debt due to the fundingsale of properties under development.senior unsecured notes to fund investments.
      (5)(3)
      Decrease primarily due to the increase in interest expense resulting from the sale of senior unsecured notes.
      (4)
      Increase due to decrease in market capitalization.
      (5)
      Increase primarily due to the increased bank borrowingincome due to rental income from completed construction projects and the new senior unsecured term notes, the increasedecrease in debt issue costs and the non-cash interest related to the contingent earn-out liabilities.expense resulting from lower outstanding debt.
      (6)
      Decrease primarily due to the decrease in outstanding debt and the increase in gross asset value from additional development and capital improvement funding.
      (7)
      Decrease primarily due to the decrease in outstanding debt and the increase in market capitalization resulting from the sale of 4,025,000 shares of common stock in a public offering.
      (8)
      Increase primarily due to the decrease in interest expense due to the decrease in outstanding debt.
      (7)(9)
      Decrease primarily due to increase in gross asset value from additional development and capital improvement funding.
      (10)
      Decrease primarily due to the increase in market capitalization.
      (8)(11)
      IncreaseDecrease primarily due to additional income generatedincrease in interest expense resulting from acquisitions.increased pricing levels under our unsecured revolving line of credit.
      (9)(12)
      In calculating our interest coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios above, we use Adjusted EBITDA, which is a financial measure not derived in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP financial measure). Adjusted EBITDA is not an alternative to net income, operating income, income from continuing operations or cash flows from operating activities as calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. You should not rely on Adjusted EBITDA as a substitute for any such U.S. GAAP financial measures or consider it in isolation, for the purpose of analyzing our financial performance, financial position or cash flows. Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Adjusted EBITDA.


       Year Ended Quarter Ended  Year Ended Quarter Ended 

       12/31/12 12/31/12 9/30/12 6/30/12 3/31/12 12/31/11  12/31/13 12/31/13 9/30/13 6/30/13 3/31/13 12/31/12 

      Net income

       $51,327 $12,778 $12,504 $13,113 $12,932 $12,604  $57,815 $14,650 $17,286 $12,903 $12,976 $12,778 

      Less: Gain on sale

       (16)    (16)  

      (Less) Add: (Gain) loss on sale

       (1,605)  (2,619) 1,014   

      Add: Interest expense

       9,932 2,907 2,988 2,004 2,033 1,993  11,364 2,852 2,581 2,798 3,133 2,907 

      Add: Depreciation and amortization—continuing & discontinued operations

       22,153 5,692 5,925 5,369 5,167 5,141  24,706 6,237 6,202 6,131 6,136 5,692 
                                

      Total adjusted EBITDA

       $83,396 $21,377 $21,417 $20,486 $20,116 $19,738  $92,280 $23,739 $23,450 $22,846 $22,245 $21,377 
                   
                                

      Interest expense

       $9,932 $2,907 $2,988 $2,004 $2,033 $1,993  $11,364 $2,852 $2,581 $2,798 $3,133 $2,907 

      Interest coverage ratio

       8.4x 7.4x 7.2x 10.2x 9.9x 9.9x 8.1x 8.3x 9.1x 8.2x 7.1x 7.4x

      Interest expense

       $9,932 $2,907 $2,988 $2,004 $2,033 $1,993  $11,364 $2,852 $2,581 $2,798 $3,133 $2,907 

      Preferred stock dividends (excludes preferred stock redemption charge)

       3,273 819 818 818 818 818  3,273 819 818 818 818 819 
                                

      Total fixed charges

       $13,205 $3,726 $3,806 $2,822 $2,851 $2,811  $14,637 $3,671 $3,399 $3,616 $3,951 $3,726 
                                
                   

      Fixed charge coverage ratio

       6.3x 5.7x 5.6x 7.3x 7.1x 7.0x 6.3x 6.5x 6.9x 6.3x 5.6x 5.7x

              We evaluate our key performance indicators in conjunction with current expectations to determine if historical trends are indicative of future results. Our expected results may not be achieved and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. This may be a result of various factors, including, but not limited to

        The status of the economy;

        The status of capital markets, including prevailing interest rates;

        Compliance with and changes to regulations and payment policies within the health care industry;

        Changes in financing terms;

        Competition within the health care and senior housing industries; and

        Changes in federal, state and local legislation.

              Management regularly monitors the economic and other factors listed above. We develop strategic and tactical plans designed to improve performance and maximize our competitive position. Our ability to achieve our financial objectives is dependent upon our ability to effectively execute these plans and to appropriately respond to emerging economic and company-specific trends.


      Operating Results

      Year ended December 31, 2013 compared to year ended December 31, 2012 (in thousands)

       
       Years ended December 31,  
       
       
       2013 2012 Difference 

      Revenues:

                

      Rental income

       $98,166 $86,022 $12,144  (1)

      Interest income from mortgage loans

        6,298  5,496  802  (2)

      Interest and other income

        510  964  (454)(3)
              

      Total revenues

        104,974  92,482  12,492 
              

      Expenses:

                

      Interest expense

        11,364  9,932  1,432  (4)

      Depreciation and amortization

        24,389  21,613  2,776  (5)

      Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

        2,180  (101) 2,281  (2)

      General and administrative expenses

        11,636  10,732  904  (6)
              

      Total expenses

        49,569  42,176  7,393 
              

      Income from continuing operations

        55,405  50,306  5,099 

      Discontinued operations:

                

      Income from discontinued operations

        805  1,005  (200)(7)

      Gain on sale of assets, net

        1,605  16  1,589  (8)
              

      Net income from discontinued operations

        2,410  1,021  1,389 
              

      Net income

        57,815  51,327  6,488 

      Income allocated to non-controlling interests

          (37) 37  (9)
              

      Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

        57,815  51,290  6,525 
              

      Income allocated to participating securities

        (383) (377) (6)

      Income allocated to preferred stockholders

        (3,273) (3,273)  
              

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $54,159 $47,640 $6,519 
              
              

      (1)
      Increased due to acquisitions and completed development projects.
      (2)
      Increased primarily due to origination of a $124,387 mortgage loan and $4,971 funding under a mortgage and construction loan partially offset by normal amortization of existing mortgage loans.
      (3)
      Decreased primarily due to the redemption of the Skilled Healthcare Group Senior Subordinated Notes and a lower bankruptcy settlement distribution from Sunwest in 2013 than in 2012.
      (4)
      Increased primarily due to the sale of senior unsecured notes to fund investments.
      (5)
      Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.
      (6)
      Increased primarily due to the one-time severance and accelerated restricted stock vesting charges related to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning and higher salaries and benefits reflective of increased staffing levels.
      (7)
      Includes the financial results from properties sold during 2013 and 2012.
      (8)
      During 2013, we sold seven skilled nursing properties with a total of 277 beds for $11,001. During 2012, we sold a 140-bed skilled nursing property for $1,248.
      (9)
      Decreased due to the conversion of all 112,588 limited partnership units during 2012.

      Year ended December 31, 2012 compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (in thousands)


       Years ended December 31,  
        Years ended December 31,  
       

       2012 2011 Difference  2012 2011 Difference 

      Revenues:

              

      Rental income

       $87,573 $77,643 $9,930  (1) $86,022 $76,096 $9,926(1)

      Interest income from mortgage loans

       5,496 6,411 (915)(2) 5,496 6,411 (915)(2)

      Interest and other income

       964 1,111 (147)(3) 964 1,111 (147)(3)
                    

      Total revenues

       94,033 85,165 8,868  92,482 83,618 8,864 
                    

      Expenses:

              

      Interest expense

       9,932 6,434 3,498  (4) 9,932 6,434 3,498(4)

      Depreciation and amortization

       22,153 19,524 2,629  (5) 21,613 18,911 2,702(5)

      Acquisition costs

       608 393 215  (6)

      Recovery for doubtful accounts

       (101) (13) (88)(2)

      General and administrative expenses

       10,029 9,272 757  (7) 10,732 9,666 1,066(6)
                    

      Total expenses

       42,722 35,623 7,099  42,176 34,998 7,178 
                    

      Income from continuing operations

       51,311 49,542 1,769  50,306 48,620 1,686 

      Discontinued operations:

              

      Loss from discontinued operations

        (99) 99  (8) 1,005 823 182(7)

      Gain on sale of assets, net

       16  16  (8) 16  16(8)
                    

      Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

       16 (99) 115  1,021 823 198 
                    

      Net income

       51,327 49,443 1,884  51,327 49,443 1,884 

      Income allocated to non-controlling interests

       (37) (191) 154  (9) (37) (191) 154(9)
                    

      Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

       51,290 49,252 2,038  51,290 49,252 2,038 
                    

      Income allocated to participating securities

       (377) (342) (35)(10) (377) (342) (35)(10)

      Income allocated to preferred stockholders

       (3,273) (9,078) 5,805  (11) (3,273) (9,078) 5,805(11)
                    

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $47,640 $39,832 $7,808  $47,640 $39,832 $7,808 
                    
             

      (1)
      Increased due to acquisitions.
      (2)
      Decreased primarily due to payoffs and normal amortization of existing mortgage loans partially offset by origination of two mortgage loans totaling $7,719.
      (3)
      Decreased primarily due to the redemption of the Skilled Healthcare Group bond.Senior Subordinated Notes.
      (4)
      Increased primarily due to an increase in bank borrowing and the sale of senior unsecured notes to fund investments.
      (5)
      Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.
      (6)
      Increased primarily due to $166,750 of acquisitions during 2012 as compared to $106,135 during 2011.
      (7)
      Increased primarily due to higher expense related to vesting of restricted stock granted, increased salaries and benefits reflective of increasingincreased staffing levels, and bonuses related to the increased volume of transactions completed during 2012.
      (8)(7)
      Includes the financial results from properties sold during 2013 and 2012. No properties were sold
      (8)
      Gain on sale of a 140-bed skilled nursing property in 2011.Texas for $1,248.
      (9)
      Decreased due to the conversion of all 112,588 limited partnership units during 2012.
      (10)
      Increased due the grant of 90,500 shares of restricted common stock during 2012.
      (11)
      Decreased due to the redemption of all of our Series F preferred stock.

      Year ended December 31, 2011 compared to year ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands)

       
       Years ended December 31,  
       
       
       2011 2010 Difference 

      Revenues:

                

      Rental income

       $77,643 $64,952 $12,691(1)

      Interest income from mortgage loans

        6,411  7,482  (1,071)(2)

      Interest and other income

        1,111  1,868  (757)(3)
              

      Total revenues

        85,165  74,302  10,863 
              

      Expenses:

                

      Interest expense

        6,434  2,653  3,781(4)

      Depreciation and amortization

        19,524  15,853  3,671(5)

      Acquisition costs

        393  370  23 

      General and administrative expenses

        9,272  9,831  (559)(6)
              

      Total expenses

        35,623  28,707  6,916 
              

      Income from continuing operations

        49,542  45,595  3,947 

      Discontinued operations:

                

      Loss from discontinued operations

        (99) 148  (247)(7)

      Gain on sale of assets, net

          310  (310)(7)
              

      Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

        (99) 458  (557)
              

      Net income

        49,443  46,053  3,390 

      Income allocated to non-controlling interests

        (191) (191)  

      Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

        49,252  45,862  3,390 

      Income allocated to participating securities

        (342) (230) (112)(8)

      Income allocated to preferred stockholders

        (9,078) (16,045) 6,967(9)
              

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $39,832 $29,587 $10,245 
              

      (1)
      Increased due to acquisitions.
      (2)
      Decreased primarily due to payoffs, normal amortization of existing mortgage loans and the conversion of a mortgage loan to an owned property. During 2010, we acquired a school property via deed-in-lieu of foreclosure as a result of the borrower filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. During 2011, we leased the school to a non-for-profit corporation that provides therapeutic support and intensive home, school and center-based behavioral therapy for children, youth and families affected by Autism Spectrum Disorders.
      (3)
      Decreased primarily due to a $770 bankruptcy settlement distribution received in 2010 related to a former operator.
      (4)
      Increased primarily due to an increase in outstanding debt to fund acquisitions, and the non-cash interest expense related to earn-out liabilities which represents the accretion of the difference between the current fair value and estimated payment of the contingent earn-out liabilities.
      (5)
      Increased due to acquisitions and capital improvement investments.
      (6)
      Decreased primarily due to a provision for doubtful accounts charge in 2010 relating to two mortgage loans (one secured by a school property in Minnesota and one secured by land in Oklahoma) partially offset by higher expense related to vesting of restricted stock granted in 2010, increased salaries and benefits reflective of increasing staffing levels, and higher consulting and marketing expenses.
      (7)
      Includes the financial results from properties sold during 2012 and 2010. No properties were sold in 2011.
      (8)
      Increased due the grant of 208,591 shares of restricted common stock during 2010.
      (9)
      Decreased due to the redemption of all of our Series E and Series F preferred stock.

      Funds From Operations

              Funds from Operations (or FFO) available to common stockholders, basic FFO available to common stockholders per share and diluted FFO available to common stockholders per share are supplemental measures of a REIT's financial performance that are not defined by U.S. GAAP. Real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, but cost accounting for real estate assets


      in accordance with U.S. GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. We believe that by excluding the effect of historical cost depreciation, which may be of limited


      relevance in evaluating current performance, FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods.

              We use FFO as a supplemental performance measurement of our cash flow generated by operations. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to net income available to common stockholders.

              We calculate and report FFO in accordance with the definition and interpretive guidelines issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (or NAREIT). FFO, as defined by NAREIT, means net income available to common stockholders (computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP) excluding gains or losses on the sale of real estate and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from us; therefore, caution should be exercised when comparing our FFO to that of other REITs.

              The following table reconciles net income available to common stockholders to FFO available to common stockholders (unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):


       For the year ended December 31,  For the year ended December 31, 

       2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $47,640 $39,832 $29,587  $54,159 $47,640 $39,832 

      Add: Depreciation and amortization (including continuing and discontinued operations)

       22,153 19,623 16,109  24,706 22,153 19,623 

      Less: Gain on sale of real estate, net

       (16)  (310) (1,605) (16)  
                    

      FFO available to common stockholders

       $69,777 $59,455 $45,386  $77,260 $69,777 $59,455 
             
                    

      FFO available to common stockholders per share:

              

      Basic

       $2.31 $2.04 $1.85  $2.33 $2.31 $2.04 
                    
             

      Diluted

       $2.26 $2.01 $1.83  $2.29 $2.26 $2.01 
             
                    

      Weighted average shares used to calculate FFO per share:

              

      Basic

       30,238 29,194 24,495  33,111 30,238 29,194 
                    
             

      Diluted

       32,508 31,539 26,824  35,342 32,508 31,539 
                    
             

      Critical Accounting Policies

              Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. SeeItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a description of the significant accounting policies we followed in preparing the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. We have identified the following significant accounting policies as critical accounting policies in that they require significant judgment and estimates and have the most impact on financial reporting.

              Impairments.    Impairment losses are recorded when events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset is impaired and the estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset are less


      than its carrying amount. Management assesses the impairment of properties individually and impairment losses are calculated as the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of assets to be


      held and used, and carrying amount over the fair value less cost to sell in instances where management has determined that we will dispose of the property. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value and other estimates of fair value such as estimated discounted future cash flows.

              Also, we evaluate the carrying values of mortgage loans receivable on an individual basis. Management periodically evaluates the realizability of future cash flows from the mortgage loan receivable when events or circumstances, such as the non-receipt of principal and interest payments and/or significant deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, indicate that the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized in current period earnings and is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable and the discounted cash flows expected to be received, or if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the mortgage.

              Accounting Standards Codification No. 320,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities (or ASC 320), requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a debt security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized as impairment through earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) other-than-temporary impairment (or OTTI) related to other factors such as an entity's ability to make scheduled interest or principal payments on the debt securities, which is recognized in other comprehensive income and 2) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement. The credit loss is determined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

              Owned Properties.    We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land and buildings and, for certain of our acquisitions, in-place leases and other intangible assets. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in-place leases, the appraisers make best estimates based on the evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. These assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases. We evaluate each purchase transaction to determine whether the acquired assets meet the definition of a business. Transaction costs related to acquisitions that are not deemed to be businesses are included in the cost basis of the acquired assets, while transaction costs related to acquisitions that are deemed to be businesses are expensed as incurred.

      Mortgage Loans Receivable.    Mortgage loans receivable we originate are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Mortgage loans we acquire are recorded at fair value at the time of purchase net of any related premium or discount which is amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan. We maintain a valuation allowance based upon the expected collectability of our mortgage loans receivable. Changes in the valuation allowance are included in current period earnings.

              Revenue Recognition.    Interest income on mortgage loans is recognized using the effective interest method. We follow a policy related to mortgage interest whereby we consider a loan to be non-performing after 60 days of non-payment of amounts due and do not recognize unpaid mortgage interest income from that loan until the past due amounts have been received.


              Rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of four methods depending on specific provisions of each lease as follows:

        (i)
        a specified annual increase over the prior year's rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

        (ii)
        a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

        (iii)
        as a percentage of facility net patient revenues in excess of base amounts or

        (iv)
        specific dollar increases.

              The FASB does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. We consider the operating history of the lessee and the general condition of the industry when evaluating whether all possible contingencies have been eliminated and have historically, and expect in the future, to not include contingent rents as income until received. We


      follow a policy related to rental income whereby we consider a lease to be non-performing after 60 days of non-payment of past due amounts and do not recognize unpaid rental income from that lease until the amounts have been received.

              Rental revenues relating to non-contingent leases that contain specified rental increases over the life of the lease are recognized on the straight-line basis. Recognizing income on a straight-line basis requires us to calculate the total non-contingent rent containing specified rental increases over the life of the lease and to recognize the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-line rent receivable asset included in our consolidated balance sheet. At some point during the lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight-line rent which results in the straight-line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of the lease term. We assess the collectability of straight-line rent in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and our reserve policy. If the lessee becomes delinquent in rent owed under the terms of the lease, we may provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recoverable.

              Net loan fee income and commitment fee income are amortized over the life of the related loan. Costs associated with leases are deferred and allocated over the lease term in proportion to the recognition of rental income.

      Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Operating Activities:

              At December 31, 2012,2013, our real estate investment portfolio (before accumulated depreciation and amortization) consisted of $900.1$937.6 million invested primarily in owned long term health care properties and mortgage loans of approximately $40.1$167.1 million (prior to deducting a $0.8$1.7 million reserve). Our portfolio consists of investments in 88100 skilled nursing properties, 104106 assisted living properties, 119 range of care properties, two schools, and fivesix parcels of land under development.development and four parcels of land held-for-use. These properties are located in 2930 states. Assisted living properties include assisted living, independent living and memory care properties. Range of care properties consist of properties providing skilled nursing and any combination of assisted living, independent living and/or memory care services. For the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we had net cash provided by operating activities of $76.7$86.2 million.

              For the year ended December 31, 20122013 we recorded $3.3$4.0 million in straight-line rental income and $38,000$37,000 in straight-line rent receivable reserve. Assuming noDuring the fourth quarter of 2013, we wrote-off a $0.9 million straight-line rent receivable balance related to the transition of four assisted living


      properties to a new leased investments with fixed annual rental escalations are added to our portfolio,lessee. For the year 2013 straight-line rental income forremaining leases in place at December 31, 2012 are projected to remain at the 2012 amount of $3.3 million. The straight-line rental income remains constant due to the new master lease entered into during the fourth quarter of 2012. Our cash rental income is projected to increase from $85.0 million in 2012 to $95.4 million in 2013, assuming no modification replacement or extensionsreplacement of existing leases and no new leased investments are added to our portfolio.portfolio, we currently expect that straight-line rental income will decrease from $3.9 million in 2013 to $2.2 million for projected annual 2014 and, conversely, our cash rental income is projected to increase from $96.0 million in 2013 to $97.5 million for projected annual 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we received $85.0$96.0 million of cash rental revenue and recorded $0.7 million of amortized lease inducement cost.


      Investing Activities:

              For the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we used $158.5$164.0 million of cash for investing activities. The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 20122013(dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
        Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing(1)

       $79,100 $275 $79,375 4 522  $14,402 $58 $14,460 1 120 

      Assisted Living(2)

       81,987 285 82,272 5 266 

      Land(3)

       5,663 207 5,870   

      Land(2)

       4,638  4,638   
                            

      Totals

       $166,750 $767 $167,517 9 788  $19,040 $58 $19,098 1 120 
                            
                 

      (1)
      Includes twoA skilled nursing properties with a total of 234 bedsproperty located in Texas and two skilled nursing properties withFlorida which was added to a totalmaster lease at an incremental initial cash yield of 288 beds located in Ohio. The weighted average GAAP rent is 10.3%8.75%.
      (2)
      Includes two properties with a total of 100 units located in Colorado and three properties with a total of 166 units located in New Jersey. The weighted average GAAP rent is 8.1%.
      (3)
      We purchased fourthree vacant parcels of land in Colorado for a total of $3,475 under a pipeline agreement whereby we have the following states: Colorado, Kansas, Kentuckyopportunity to finance any senior housing development project or acquisition originated by an operator through May 2018 (unless earlier terminated as provided for therein). The land was added to an existing master lease and Texas. Simultaneous with the purchase, we entered into lease agreements and development commitments in an amount not to exceed $49,702$30,256 to fund the construction of athree memory care propertyproperties, two with 60 units and two assisted livingthe other with 48 units. We also purchased four parcels of land held-for-use in Michigan for $1,163.

              As part of an acquisition in 2011, we committed to provide a contingent payment if certain operational thresholds were met. The contingent payment was recorded at fair value, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, and we accreted the contingent liability to the settlement amount as of the payment date. The fair value of such contingent liability was re-evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. During 2013, we paid $7.0 million related to the contingent liability. Accordingly, we have no remaining contingent liability as of December 31, 2013.

              During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, a lessee exercised its option to purchase six skilled nursing properties located in Ohio with a total of 158 units and one230 beds for an all cash purchase price of $11.0 million. As a result, we recorded a $2.6 million gain on sale. Also, during 2013, we sold a 47-bed skilled nursing property with 143 beds. Rents due underin Colorado for $1,000 and recognized a loss of $1.0 million on the lease will begin upon the earlier of project completion or the improvement deadline specified in the lease. The weighted average initial rent rate is 9.1%.sale.

              During the yeartwelve months ended December 31, 2012,2013, we fundedcompleted the following under our development, redevelopment, renovation and expansion projects(excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):construction projects:

      Type of Property
       Investment
      Commitment
       2012
      Funding(2)
       Total
      Funded
       Remaining
      Commitment
       Number of
      Properties
       Number of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $36,094 $8,310 $9,204 $26,890  6  759 

      Assisted Living(1)

        40,927  8,242  8,242  32,685  6  458 

      Range of Care

        739  66  739    2  211 
                    

      Totals

       $77,760 $16,618(3)$18,185 $59,575  14  1,428 
                    
      Completed Date
       Type of Property Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       State Completed Date 2013 Funding Total Funding 

      Jul 2013

       Assisted Living(1)  60 Colorado  Jul 2013 $4,316 $9,850 

      Jul 2013

       Skilled Nursing(2)  120 Texas  Jul 2013  5,065  8,635 

      Oct 2013

       Assisted Living(3)  77 Kansas  Oct 2013  8,081  9,675 
                     

       Totals  257      $17,462 $28,160 
                     
                     

      (1)
      Includes the developmentThis new property is a Memory Care property. The funded amount includes acquired land of a 60-unit memory care property for $9,817 and two assisted living and memory care combination properties for a total of $16,385, the expansion of two assisted living properties for a total $14,600 and the renovation of a 140-unit independent living property for $125.$1,882.

      (2)
      Includes acquired land of $5,663 and excludes $134 of capital improvement funding.This new property replaces a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio.
      (3)
      Subsequent to December 31, 2012, weThe funded $2,972 under investment commitments.amount includes acquired land of $730.

              During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we soldreceived $1.9 million in regularly scheduled principal payments from our mortgage loans. Additionally, we funded a 140-bed$124.4 million mortgage loan with a third-party operator, Prestige Healthcare, secured by 15 skilled nursing property locatedproperties with a total of 2,092 beds in Texas for $1.2 million and recognized a gain, net of selling expenses, of $16,000. This property was leased under a master lease and the economic terms of this master lease did not change as a result of this sale.

              During the year ended December 2012, we originated a $5.1 million two-year interest-only bridge loan.Michigan. The loan is secured byfor a 70-unit assisted living property in Pennsylvaniaterm of 30 years and bears interest at 7.0% increasing9.53% for five years, escalating annually thereafter by 1.5%2.25%. WePayments are interest-only for three years, after which the borrower will make interest payments along with annual principal payments of $1.0 million. The loan agreement provides for additional forward commitments of $12.0 million for capital improvements at 9.41% for the first twelve months. The loan agreement also originatedprovides, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, for additional loan proceeds of up to $40.0 million with such proceeds limited to $10.0 million per twelve months.

              The borrower has a one-time option between the third and twelfth years to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. Exclusively for the purposes of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from portfolio of properties securing the loan. If the prepayment option is exercised and timely concluded, the borrower forfeits its opportunity to access any additional loan proceeds. Additionally, under certain circumstances, including a change in regulatory environment, we have the option to purchase the properties.

              During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we funded $5.0 million under a $10.6 million mortgage and construction loan. This loan is secured by an operationala currently operating skilled nursing property and a vacant parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement facility will beis being constructed. The term is 10 years and interest is 9.0% increasing 25 basis points annually. The agreement gives us the right to purchase the replacement facility for $13.5 million during an 18 month period beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. If the purchase option is exercised, the replacement facility will be added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option is exercised. As of December 31, 2012, we funded $2.6 million of loan proceeds and


      2013, we have a remaining commitment of $8.0 million on this mortgage and construction loan. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we funded $0.9$3.0 million under this mortgageloan.

              During 2013, we received $3.0 million for the early repayment of two loans with interest ranging from 8.5% to 9.0%. Also during 2013, we committed to fund three loans up to $0.4 million each with interest at 12%. Two of these loans mature in September 2017 and construction loanone matures in December 2017. We also committed to fund three pre-development loans of $0.3 million each to facilitate the site selection and pre-construction services for the future development of three memory care properties. The initial rate of each of these pre-development loans is 12%, increasing by 25 basis points per year. Each of these pre-development loans matured due to the acquisition of the land and the outstanding balance of $0.5 million was capitalized under the development projects.

              As of December 31, 2013, we have a remaining commitment of $7.1 million.

              During the year ended December 31, 2012, we received $2.6 million in regularly scheduled principal payments and we received $19.1 million plus accrued interest related to the early payoff of eleven mortgageseven loans secured by four skilled nursing properties and seven assisted living properties.

              During the year ended December 31, 2012, we received $6.5 million plus accrued interest related to Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.'s (or SHG) redemption of their outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes. The Senior Subordinated Notes had a face rate of 11.0% and an effective rate of 11.1%.

              During the year ended December 31, 2012, we funded $0.6 million under a 9.0% construction and term loan for capital improvements at one skilled nursing property we own and lease to the borrower. This loan will fully amortize to maturity in May 2018. Also during 2012, we also funded $2.3 million under an 8.5% construction and term loan for capital improvements at two range of care properties we own and lease to the borrower. This loan will fully amortize to maturity in November 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we received $0.6 million in principal payments on loan and line of credit agreements with certain operators.a total commitment of $2.4 million and a remaining commitment balance of $1.8 million. The average interest rate of these loans is 11.5%. During 2013, we received principal payments, including loan payoffs, of $3.1 million and we advanced principal of $1.0 million.

      Financing Activities:

              For the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we had net cash provided by financing activities of $84.6$77.3 million. During 2012,2013, we paid $0.6 million in scheduled principal payments on bonds payable.

              During 2012, we amended our Unsecured Credit Agreement increasing the commitment to $240.0 million with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $350.0 million. Additionally, the drawn pricing was decreased by 25 basis points, the undrawn pricing was decreased by 10 basis points and the maturity of the facility was extended for one additional year to May 25, 2016. The amendment also provides for a one-year extension option at our discretion, subject to customary conditions. Based on our leverage ratios during 2012, the amended facility provides for interest annually at LIBOR plus 125 basis points and the unused commitment fee was 25 basis points. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we anticipate that the annual interest will increase to LIBOR plus 150 basis points and 30 basis points for the unused commitment fee based on our leverage ratios at December 31, 2012. Financial covenants contained in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, which are measured quarterly, require us to maintain, among other things:

        (i)
        a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value not greater than 0.5 to 1.0;

        (ii)
        a ratio of secured debt to total asset value not greater than 0.35 to 1.0;

        (iii)
        a ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset pool not greater than 0.6 to 1.0; and

        (iv)
        a ratio of EBITDA, as calculated in the new Unsecured Credit Agreement, to fixed charges not less than 1.50 to 1.0.

      During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we borrowed $153.5$93.0 million and repaid $94.0$187.5 million under our Unsecured Credit Agreement.unsecured revolving line of credit. At December 31, 2012,2013, we had $115.5$21.0 million outstanding at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25% and $124.5$219.0 million available for borrowing. Subsequent to December 31, 2012,2013, we borrowed $2.0$11.5 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%. After this borrowing,Accordingly, we had $117.5$32.5 million outstanding and $122.5$207.5 million available for borrowing. At December 31, 2012,2013, we were in compliance with all our covenants.


              During the 2012, we sold 12-year senior unsecured notes in the aggregate amount of $85.8 million to a group of institutional investors in a private placement transaction. The notes bear interest at 5.0%, mature on July 19, 2024 and have scheduled annual principal pay downs of $17.2 million in years 8 through 12. We used a portion of the proceeds to pay down our Unsecured Credit Agreement and used the remaining proceeds to fund acquisitions. At December 31, 2012,2013, we had $185.8$255.8 million outstanding under our Senior Unsecured Notes with a weighted average interest rate of 5.2%4.85%. During 2013, we sold to affiliates and we were in compliance with allmanaged accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (or individually and collectively Prudential) $70.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.99% senior unsecured term notes fully amortizing to maturity on November 20, 2021. We used the proceeds to pay down our covenants.unsecured revolving line of credit.

              At December 31, 2012,On October 30, 2013, we haveentered into an Amendedamended and Restated Note Purchaserestated note purchase and Private Shelfprivate shelf agreement with Prudential. The shelf agreement with Prudential, which provides foras amended, conforms the possible issuance of up to an additional $100.0 million ofdefinitions and financial covenants contained therein and previously issued senior unsecured fixed-rate termpromissory notes through October 19, 2014.outstanding to Prudential and certain of its affiliates and managed accounts to those contained in our unsecured credit facility and to covenants contained in the senior unsecured notes sold in July 2012. Any notes sold by us to Prudential under the shelf agreement will be in amounts at fixed interest rates and have maturity dates (each note to have a final maturity not greater than 12 years and an average life not greater than 10 years from the date of issuance) subject to further agreement by us and Prudential.

              We haveThe shelf agreement with Prudential contains standard covenants including requirements to maintain financial ratios such as debt to asset value ratios. Under the shelf agreement, maximum total indebtedness shall not exceed 50% of total asset value as defined in the shelf agreement, as amended. Borrowings under the shelf agreement are limited by reference to the value of unencumbered assets. Under the shelf agreement, maximum unsecured debt shall not exceed 60% of the value of the unencumbered asset pool as defined in the shelf agreement.

              During 2013, we sold 4,025,000 shares of common stock at a price of $44.50 per share, before fees and costs of $7.7 million, in a public offering. The net proceeds of $171.4 million were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving line of credit, to fund acquisitions and our current development commitments and general corporate purposes. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we acquired 6,925 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

              During 2013, we terminated an equity distribution agreement which allowsallowed us to issue and sell, from time to time, up to $85.7 million in aggregate offering price of our common shares. Sales of common shares arewere made by means of ordinary brokers' transactions at market prices, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed between us and our sales agents. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we did not sellsold 126,742 shares of common stock for $4.9 million in net proceeds under our equity distribution agreement. At December 31, 2012, we had $64.6 million available under this agreement.

              We had a Board of Directors repurchase authorized program enabling us to repurchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our equity securities, including common and preferred securities. During 2012, we did not purchase shares of our equity securities and our Board of Directors terminated this repurchase authorization.

              During 2012, we amended our charter to increaseIn conjunction with the number of authorized sharessale of common stock, from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000 shares. The charter amendment was approved by our stockholders at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders held on May 22, 2012.

              During 2012, we reclassified all$0.7 million of accumulated costs associated with the authorized but unissued shares of our 8.5% Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and our 8.0% Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock as authorized but unissued and unclassified shares of our preferred stock. No shares of Series E preferred stock or Series F preferred stock were outstanding immediately priorequity distribution agreement to the reclassification.additional paid in capital.

              We paid cash dividends on our 8.5% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock totaling $3.3 million. Additionally, we declared and paid cash dividends on our common stock totaling $54.5$63.6 million. In January 2013,2014, we declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.155$0.17 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 20132014 payable on January 31, February 28 and March 28, 2013,2014, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23, February 20 and March 20, 2013,21, 2014, respectively.

              At December 31, 2012,2013, we had a 2008 Equity Participation Plan, under which 600,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for awards, including nonqualified stock option grants and restricted stock grants to officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The terms of the awards


      granted under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan are set by our compensation committee at its discretion. During 2012,2013, we granted 90,50034,400 shares of restricted common stock as follows:

      No. of Shares
       Price per
      Share
       Vesting Period
       14,000 $31.77 ratably over 5 years
       12,200 $31.77 January 10, 2016
       30,000 $31.77 June 15, 2015
       8,000 $31.87 ratably over 3 years
       6,300 $34.90 ratably over 5 years
       20,000 $34.90 December 20, 2015
      No. of Shares
       Price per
      Share
       Vesting Period
       8,400 $46.54 ratably over 3 years
       6,000 $41.83 ratably over 3 years
       20,000 $36.26 June 1, 2016
            
       34,400     
            
            

              In JanuaryAlso during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the vesting of 18,180 shares of restricted common stock were accelerated due to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we granted 20,00059,000 shares of restricted common stock at $36.26$36.81 per share. These shares all vest on June 1, 2016.ratably over a three-year period from the grant date. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, a total of 85,00022,000 stock options were exercised at a total option value of $1.9$0.5 million and a total market value on the date of exercise of $2.8$0.9 million. No stock options were issuedgranted during 2012.

              During 2012, two2013 and all stock options outstanding are vested as of our limited partners exercised their conversion rights to exchange all of their 112,588 partnership units. At our discretion, we converted 23,294 partnership units into an equal number of our common shares. The partnership conversion price was $17.00 per partnership unit. At our discretion, we elected to satisfy the conversion of 89,294 limited partnership units with cash. We paid the limited partners $2.8 million, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the redemption date plus $0.05 per share multiplied by the number of limited partnership units redeemed. The amount we paid upon redemption exceeded the book value of the limited partnership interest redeemed by $1.2 million. Accordingly, the $1.2 million excess book value of the limited partners' interest in the partnership was reclassified to stockholders' equity. We accounted for these conversions as an equity transaction because there was no change in control requiring consolidation or deconsolidation and remeasurement. At December 31, 2012, we had no shares of our common stock reserved under partnership agreements.2013.

      Available Shelf Registrations:Registration:

              On July 19, 2013, we filed a Form S-3ASR "shelf" registration statement to replace our prior shelf registration statement. Our current shelf registration statement provides us with the capacity to offer up to $400.0$800.0 million in common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt, depositary shares, or units. We may from time to time raise capital under our current shelf registration in amounts, at prices, and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of the offering. At December 31, 2012, we had availability of $167.6 million under our effective shelf registration.

      Commitments:

              WeAs part of an acquisition in 2011, we committed to provide $1.4 million in loan and line of credit agreements to certain operators. As of December 31, 2012, we had funded $20,000 under these commitments and have a remaining commitment of $1.4 million. These loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 9.0% to 12.0% and maturities ranging from 2013 to 2014.

              During 2011, we purchased four skilled nursing properties with 524-beds in Texas. As part of the purchase agreement, we paid cash at closing and committed to provide contingent earn-out paymentspayment if certain operational thresholds arewere met. The contingent earn-out payment arrangements require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $11.0 million upon the properties achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. During 2011, we paid $4.0 million related to the first contingent earn-out payment. Wewas recorded the contingent earn-out payments at fair value, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, and are accretingwe accreted the earn-outcontingent liability to the estimated settlement amount as of the payment date. ThisThe fair value measurementof such contingent liability was re-evaluated on a quarterly basis based on significant input not observablechanges in theestimates of future operating results and changes in market and thus represented a Level 3 measurement.discount rates. During 2011,2013, we paid $0.4$7.0 million related to the first contingent earn-out payment. During 2012 and 2011, we recorded non-cash interest expense of $0.4 million and $0.5 million respectively,$256,000 related to the earn-outcontingent liability. AtAccordingly, we have no remaining contingent liability as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the earn-out liability had a carrying value2013.

              As of $6.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively.

              WeDecember 31, 2013, we have a commitment to fundprovide, under certain conditions, up to $5.0 million per year through December 2014 to an existing operator for expansion of the life of a master37 properties they lease which has a maturity date of December 2014.from us. The estimated yield of this commitment is 9.5% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the five days prior to funding, minus 420 basis points. Additionally, weAs of December 31, 2013, no funds have been requested under this commitment. Excluding the $5.0 million per year commitment, the following development, redevelopment,table summarizes our investment


      renovation and expansion commitments as of December 31, 2013 and year to date funding for the year ended December 31, 2012on our ongoing development, redevelopment, renovation(excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Investment Commitment 2012 Funding(2) Total Funded Remaining Commitment Number of Properties Number of Beds/Units  Investment
      Commitment
       2013
      Funding(2)
       Commitment
      Funded
       Remaining
      Commitment
       Number of
      Properties
       Number of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $36,094 $8,310 $9,204 $26,890 6 759  $29,650 $7,221 $12,757 $16,893 6 640 

      Assisted Living(1)

       40,927 8,242 8,242 32,685 6 458  50,656 9,614 10,661 39,995 7 385 

      Range of Care

       739 66 739  2 211 
                                

      Totals

       $77,760 $16,618(3)$18,185 $59,575 14 1,428  $80,306 $16,835(3)$23,418 $56,888(3) 13 1,025 
                                
                   

      (1)
      Includes the development of a 60-unitthree memory care propertyproperties for $9,817 and twoa total of $30,256, one assisted living and memory care combination propertiesproperty for a total of $16,385,$5,800, and the expansion of twothree assisted living properties for a total $14,600 and the renovation of a 140-unit independent living property for $125.$14,600.
      (2)
      Includes acquired land of $5,663Excludes funding for completed construction projects shown above and excludes $134$260 of capital improvement funding.on three completed projects with no remaining commitments. It also includes $6 funded under the commitment as marketing expense, $3,475 of land acquired for development and the reclass of three pre-development loans with a total balance of $479. SeeInvesting Activities above for further discussion on the pre-development loans.
      (3)
      Subsequent to December 31, 2012,2013, we funded $2,972$8,828 under investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $48,060.

              We committed to fund a $10.6 million mortgage and construction loan secured by an operational skilled nursing property and a vacant parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement facility will be constructed. Interest on the loan will beis paid monthly in arrears at a rate of 9.0% increasing 25 basis points annually. The term of the loan is 10 years. The agreement gives us the right to purchase the replacement facility for $13.5 million during an 18 month period beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. If the purchase option is exercised, the replacement facility will be added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option is exercised. As of December 31, 2012,2013, we funded $2.6$7.6 million of loan proceeds and we have a remaining commitment of $8.0$3.0 million on this mortgage and construction loan. Subsequent

              We committed to provide a borrower an additional $12.0 million for capital improvements and, under certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, additional proceeds of up to $40.0 million. As of December 31, 2012,2013, there has been no funding under either of these commitments. At December 31, 2013, we had outstanding commitments of $2.4 million in loans and line of credit agreements to certain operators. As of December 31, 2013, we had funded $0.9$0.6 million under this mortgagethese commitments and construction loan and we havehad a remaining commitment of $7.1$1.8 million. These loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 10.0% to 12.25% and maturities ranging from 2014 to 2017.

      Contractual Obligations:

              We monitor our contractual obligations and commitments detailed above to ensure funds are available to meet obligations when due. The following table represents our long termlong-term contractual obligations (scheduled principal payments and amounts due at maturity) as of December 31, 2012,2013, and excludes the effects of interest (in thousands):


       Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter  Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 

      Bank borrowings

       $115,500(1)$ $ $ $115,500 $ $  $21,000(1)$ $ $21,000 $ $ $ 

      Senior unsecured notes

       185,800  4,167 29,166 16,667 14,167 121,633  255,800 4,167 29,166 26,667 26,167 28,167 141,466 

      Bonds payable

       2,635 600 635 1,400     2,035 635 1,400     
                                    

       $303,935 $600 $4,802 $30,566 $132,167 $14,167 $121,633  $278,835 $4,802 $30,566 $47,667 $26,167 $28,167 $141,466 
                                    
                     

      (1)
      At December 31, 20122013 we had $124,500$219,000 available for borrowing under our Unsecured Credit Agreement. During Januaryunsecured revolving line of credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $2,000. After this borrowing,$11,500. Accordingly, we had $117,500$32,500 outstanding and $122,500$207,500 available for borrowing.

              Assuming no additional borrowing under our Unsecured Credit Agreement,unsecured revolving line of credit, no change in the variable interest rate under our bond payable, and principal payments are paid as scheduled under our


      senior unsecured notes and bond payables, the following table represents our projected interest expense as of December 31, 20122013 (in thousands):


       Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter  Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 

      Bank borrowings

       $8,088 $2,367 $2,367 $2,367 $987 $ $  $5,133 $2,124 $2,124 $885 $ $ $ 

      Senior unsecured notes

       63,048 9,466 9,235 8,386 7,192 6,403 22,366  68,596 12,028 11,179 9,952 8,757 7,552 19,128 

      Bonds payable

       121 60 41 20     60 41 19     
                                    

       $71,257 $11,893 $11,643 $10,773 $8,179 $6,403 $22,366  $73,789 $14,193 $13,322 $10,837 $8,757 $7,552 $19,128 
                                    
                     

      Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:

              We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2012.2013.

      Liquidity:

              We have an Unsecured Credit Agreement in the amount of $240.0 million with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $350.0 million. The Unsecured Credit Agreement provides a revolving line of credit with no scheduled maturities other than the maturity date of May 25, 2016. Based on our maximum total indebtedness to total asset value ratio as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, during 2012, our pricing under the Unsecured Credit Agreement is either Prime Rate plus 0.25% or LIBOR plus 1.25% depending on our borrowing election. At the time of borrowing, we may elect the 1, 2, 3 or 6 month LIBOR rate. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we anticipate that our pricing will increase to Prime Rate plus 0.50% and LIBOR plus 1.50% based on our leverage ratios at December 31, 2012.

              At December 31, 2012,2013, we had $7.2$6.8 million of cash on hand, $124.5$219.0 million available on our $240.0 million Unsecured Credit Agreement,unsecured revolving line of credit, and $100.0$30.0 million available under the uncommitted private shelf agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $11.5 million and, therefore, have $207.5 million available under or unsecured revolving line of credit. Also, our potential ability to access the capital markets through the issuance of $64.6 million of common stock under our equity distribution agreement and through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities under our $167.6$800.0 million effective shelf registration. As a result, we believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to provide for payment of our current operating costs, debt obligations (both principal and interest) and capital commitments to our lessees and borrowers and to provide funds for distribution to the holders of our preferred stock and pay common dividends at least sufficient to maintain our REIT status. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates.


      Item 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

              You are cautioned that statements contained in this section are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with the disclosure under the heading "Cautionary Statements" and the "Risk Factors" set forth above.

              We are exposed to market risks associated with changes in interest rates as they relate to our mortgage loans receivable and debt. Interest rate risk is sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control.

              We do not utilize interest rate swaps, forward or option contracts or foreign currencies or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments nor do we engage in "off-balance sheet" transactions. The purpose of the following disclosure is to provide a framework to understand our sensitivity to hypothetical changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2012.2013.

              Our future earnings, cash flows and estimated fair values relating to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market rates of interest, such as LIBOR or term rates of U.S. Treasury Notes. Changes in interest rates generally impact the fair value, but not future earnings or cash flows, of mortgage loans receivable and fixed rate debt. Our mortgage loans receivable and debt, such as our senior unsecured notes, are primarily fixed-rate instruments. For variable rate debt, such as our revolving line of credit, changes in interest rates generally do not impact the fair value, but do affect future earnings and cash flows.

              At December 31, 2012,2013, the fair value of our mortgage loans receivable using a 6.0%an 8.4% discount rate was approximately $44.9$200.2 million. A 1% increase in such rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our mortgage loans by approximately $1.2$16.5 million while a 1% decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately $1.2$19.6 million. At December 31, 2012,2013, the fair value of our senior unsecured notes using a 3.8%3.95% discount rate for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.3%4.25% discount rate for those maturing beyond year 2020 was approximately $194.8$262.4 million. A 1% increase in such rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our senior unsecured notes by approximately $10.5$12.3 million while a 1% decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately $11.3$13.1 million. These discount rates were measured based upon management's estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us and instruments of comparable maturities.

              The estimated impact of changes in interest rates discussed above are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing costs, lending rates and current U.S. Treasury rates from which our financial instruments may be priced. We do not believe that future market rate risks related to our financial instruments will be material to our financial position or results of operations. These analyses do not consider the effects of industry specific events, changes in the real estate markets, or other overall economic activities that could increase or decrease the fair value of our financial instruments. If such events or changes were to occur, we would consider taking actions to mitigate and/or reduce any negative exposure to such changes. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our capital structure.


      Item 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


      Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
      and Financial Statement Schedules

       
       Page

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

       5453

      Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012


      54

      Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

       
      55

      Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010


      56

      Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

       
      5756

      Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

       
      5857

      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

       
      5958

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

       
      6059

      Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

       
       

      Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

       
      86

      Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

       
      87

      Schedule IV—Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

       
      92

      Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

       
      95

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

       
      96


      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of LTC Properties, Inc.

              We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LTC Properties, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012.2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

              We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

              In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of LTC Properties, Inc. at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012,2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

              We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), LTC Properties, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated February 21, 201320, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

      Los Angeles, California
      February 21, 201320, 2014



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

      (In thousands)


       December 31,
      2012
       December 31,
      2011
        December 31,
      2013
       December 31,
      2012
       

      ASSETS

            

      Real estate investments:

            

      Land

       $75,407 $57,369  $80,993 $74,702 

      Buildings and improvements

       824,688 664,758  856,624 811,867 

      Accumulated depreciation and amortization

       (198,548) (176,546) (218,700) (194,448)
                

      Net operating real estate property

       701,547 545,581  718,917 692,121 

      Properties held-for-sale, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization: 2012—$0; 2011—$1,650

        1,254 

      Properties held-for-sale, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization: 2013—$0; 2012—$4,100

        9,426 
                

      Net real estate property

       701,547 546,835  718,917 701,547 

      Mortgage loans receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2012—$782; 2011—$921

       39,299 53,081 

      Mortgage loans receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2013—$1,671; 2012—$782

       165,444 39,299 
                

      Real estate investments, net

       740,846 599,916  884,361 740,846 

      Other assets:

        
       
       
       
       

      Cash and cash equivalents

       7,191 4,408  6,778 7,191 

      Debt issue costs, net

       3,040 2,301  2,458 3,040 

      Interest receivable

       789 1,494  702 789 

      Straight-line rent receivable,(1) net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2012—$1,557; 2011—$1,519

       26,998 23,772 

      Straight-line rent receivable,(1) net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2013—$1,541; 2012—$1,513

       29,760 26,766 

      Prepaid expenses and other assets

       7,548 7,904  6,756 7,542 

      Notes receivable

       3,180 817  595 3,180 

      Marketable securities(2)

        6,485 

      Straight-line rent receivable and other assets related to properties held-for-sale, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2013—$0; 2012—$44

        238 
                

      Total assets

       $789,592 $647,097  $931,410 $789,592 
           
                

      LIABILITIES

            

      Bank borrowings

       $115,500 $56,000  $21,000 $115,500 

      Senior unsecured notes

       185,800 100,000  255,800 185,800 

      Bonds payable

       2,635 3,200  2,035 2,635 

      Accrued interest

       3,279 1,356  3,424 3,279 

      Earn-out liabilities

       6,744 6,305   6,744 

      Accrued expenses and other liabilities

       12,526 11,440  16,713 12,165 

      Accrued expenses and other liabilities related to properties held-for-sale

        86   361 
                

      Total liabilities

       326,484 178,387  298,972 326,484 

      EQUITY

        
       
       
       
       

      Stockholders' equity:

            

      Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 15,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2012—2,000; 2011—2,000

       38,500 38,500 

      Common stock: $0.01 par value; 60,000 shares authorized;(3) shares issued and outstanding: 2012—30,544; 2011—30,346

       305 303 

      Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 15,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2013—2,000; 2012—2,000

       38,500 38,500 

      Common stock: $0.01 par value; 60,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2013—34,746; 2012—30,544

       347 305 

      Capital in excess of par value

       510,236 507,343  688,654 510,236 

      Cumulative net income

       724,033 672,743  781,848 724,033 

      Accumulated other comprehensive income

       152 199  117 152 

      Cumulative distributions

       (810,125) (752,340) (877,028) (810,125)
                

      Total LTC Properties, Inc. stockholders' equity

       463,101 466,748  632,438 463,101 

      Non-controlling interests

       7 1,962  
       
      7
       
                

      Total equity

       463,108 468,710  632,438 463,108 
                

      Total liabilities and equity

       $789,592 $647,097  $931,410 $789,592 
                
           

      (1)
      On December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, we had $3,191$3,213 and $3,060$3,191 respectively, in straight-line rent receivable from a lessee that qualifies as a related party because the lessee's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.
      (2)
      At December 31, 2011, we had a $6,500 face value investment in marketable securities issued by an entity that qualifies as a related party because the entity's Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.
      (3)
      During 2012, our charter was amended to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 45,000 to 60,000 shares. The charter amendment was approved by our stockholders at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholder held on May 22, 2012.

      See accompanying notes.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

      (In thousands, except per share amounts)


       Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31, 

       2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

      Revenues:

              

      Rental income(1)

       $87,573 $77,643 $64,952  $98,166 $86,022 $76,096 

      Interest income from mortgage loans

       5,496 6,411 7,482  6,298 5,496 6,411 

      Interest and other income(2)

       964 1,111 1,868  510 964 1,111 
                    

      Total revenues

       94,033 85,165 74,302  104,974 92,482 83,618 
                    

      Expenses:

              

      Interest expense

       9,932 6,434 2,653  11,364 9,932 6,434 

      Depreciation and amortization

       22,153 19,524 15,853  24,389 21,613 18,911 

      Acquisition costs

       608 393 370 

      Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

       2,180 (101) (13)

      General and administrative expenses

       10,029 9,272 9,831  11,636 10,732 9,666 
                    

      Total expenses

       42,722 35,623 28,707  49,569 42,176 34,998 
                    

      Income from continuing operations

       51,311 49,542 45,595  55,405 50,306 48,620 

      Discontinued operations:

              

      (Loss) income from discontinued operations

        (99) 148 

      Income from discontinued operations

       805 1,005 823 

      Gain on sale of assets, net

       16  310  1,605 16  
                    

      Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

       16 (99) 458  2,410 1,021 823 
                    

      Net income

       51,327 49,443 46,053  57,815 51,327 49,443 

      Income allocated to non-controlling interests

       (37) (191) (191)  (37) (191)
             

      Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

       51,290 49,252 45,862  57,815 51,290 49,252 
                    

      Income allocated to participating securities

       (377) (342) (230) (383) (377) (342)

      Income allocated to preferred stockholders

       (3,273) (9,078) (16,045) (3,273) (3,273) (9,078)
                    

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $47,640 $39,832 $29,587  $54,159 $47,640 $39,832 
             
                    

      Basic earnings per common share:

              

      Continuing operations

       $1.58 $1.37 $1.19  $1.56 $1.54 $1.34 

      Discontinued operations

       $0.00 $0.00 $0.02  $0.07 $0.03 $0.03 
                    

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $1.58 $1.36 $1.21  $1.64 $1.58 $1.36 
             
                    

      Diluted earnings per common share:

              

      Continuing operations

       $1.57 $1.37 $1.19  $1.56 $1.54 $1.33 

      Discontinued operations

       $0.00 ($0.01)$0.02  $0.07 $0.03 $0.02 
                    

      Net income available to common stockholders

       $1.57 $1.36 $1.21  $1.63 $1.57 $1.36 
             
                    

      Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share:

              

      Basic

       30,238 29,194 24,495  33,111 30,238 29,194 

      Diluted

       30,278 29,222 24,568  33,142 30,278 29,222 

      (1)
      During 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, we received $4,479, $4,370, $4,264, and $4,160,$4,264, respectively, in rental income and recorded $22, $131 $238 and $342,$238, respectively, in straight-line rental income from a lessee that qualifies as a related party because the lessee's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.
      (2)
      During 2013, we did not recognize any interest income from related parties. During 2012 2011 and 20102011 we recognized $235, $721, and $720,$721, respectively, of interest income from an entity that qualifies as a related party because the entity's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

      NOTE: Computations of per share amounts from continuing operations, discontinued operations and net income are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not agree with the per share amounts from net income available to common stockholders.

      See accompanying notes.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

      (In thousands, except per share amounts)


       Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31, 

       2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

      Net income

       $51,327 $49,443 $46,053  $57,815 $51,327 $49,443 

      Reclassification adjustment

       (47) (65) (126) (35) (47) (65)
                    

      Comprehensive income

       51,280 49,378 45,927  57,780 51,280 49,378 

      Comprehensive income allocated to non-controlling interests

       (37) (191) (191)  (37) (191)
                    

      Comprehensive income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

       $51,243 $49,187 $45,736  $57,780 $51,243 $49,187 
                    
             

      See accompanying notes.


      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

      (In thousands)


       Shares  
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        Shares  
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
       

       Preferred
      Stock
       Common
      Stock
       Preferred
      Stock
       Common
      Stock
       Capital in
      Excess of
      Par Value
       Cumulative
      Net
      Income
       Accumulated
      OCI
       Cumulative
      Distributions
       Total
      Stockholders'
      Equity
       Non-
      controlling
      Interests
       Total
      Equity
        Preferred
      Stock
       Common
      Stock
       Preferred
      Stock
       Common
      Stock
       Capital in
      Excess of
      Par Value
       Cumulative
      Net
      Income
       Accumulated
      OCI
       Cumulative
      Distributions
       Total
      Stockholders'
      Equity
       Non-
      controlling
      Interests
       Total
      Equity
       

      Balance—December 31, 2009

       7,932 23,312 $186,801 $233 $326,163 $577,629 $390 $(638,884)$452,332 $1,981 $454,313 

      Conversion of 8.5% Series E Preferred Stock

       
      (33

      )
       
      66
       
      (823

      )
       
      1
       
      822
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

      8.5% Series E Preferred Stock full redemption

       (5)  (123)  6   (6) (123)  (123)

      8.0% Series F Preferred Stock partial redemption

       (2,358)  (58,942)  2,377   (2,377) (58,942)  (58,942)

      Reclassification adjustment

             (126)  (126)   (126)

      Stock option exercises

        12   182    182  182 

      Issue common stock

        2,746  27 67,766    67,793  67,793 

      Issue restricted stock

        209  2 (2)       

      Net income

            45,862   45,862 191 46,053 

      Vested stock options

           75    75  75 

      Vested restricted stock

           1,210    1,210  1,210 

      Non-controlling interests preferred return

                (210) (210)

      Preferred stock dividends

              (13,662) (13,662)  (13,662)

      Common stock cash distributions ($1.58 per share)

              (39,041) (39,041)  (39,041)
                             

      Balance—December 31, 2010

       5,536 26,345 126,913 263 398,599 623,491 264 (693,970) 455,560 1,962 457,522  5,536 26,345 $126,913 $263 $398,599 $623,491 $264 $(693,970)$455,560 $1,962 $457,522 
                             

      8.0% Series F Preferred Stock full redemption

       (3,536)  (88,413)  3,566   (3,566) (88,413)  (88,413) 
      (3,536

      )
       
       
      (88,413

      )
       
       
      3,566
       
       
       
      (3,566

      )
       
      (88,413

      )
       
       
      (88,413

      )

      Reclassification adjustment

             (65)  (65)  (65)       (65)  (65)  (65)

      Stock option exercises

        5   120    120  120   5   120    120  120 

      Issue common stock

        3,990  40 103,591    103,631  103,631   3,990  40 103,591    103,631  103,631 

      Issue restricted stock

        6            6          

      Net income

            49,252   49,252 191 49,443       49,252   49,252 191 49,443 

      Vested stock options

           17    17  17      17    17  17 

      Vested restricted stock

           1,450    1,450  1,450      1,450    1,450  1,450 

      Non-controlling interests preferred return

                (191) (191)          (191) (191)

      Preferred stock dividends

              (5,512) (5,512)  (5,512)        (5,512) (5,512)  (5,512)

      Common stock cash distributions ($1.68 per share)

              (49,292) (49,292)  (49,292)        (49,292) (49,292)  (49,292)
                                                    

      Balance—December 31, 2011

       2,000 30,346 38,500 303 507,343 672,743 199 (752,340) 466,748 1,962 468,710  2,000 30,346 38,500 303 507,343 672,743 199 (752,340) 466,748 1,962 468,710 
                                                    

      Reclassification adjustment

             (47)  (47)  (47)       (47)  (47)  (47)

      Stock option exercises

        85  1 1,925    1,926  1,926   85  1 1,925    1,926  1,926 

      Issue restricted stock

        90  1 (1)         90  1 (1)       

      Net income

            51,290   51,290 37 51,327       51,290   51,290 37 51,327 

      Vested stock options

           10    10  10      10    10  10 

      Vested restricted stock

           1,809    1,809  1,809      1,809    1,809  1,809 

      Non-controlling interests conversion

        23   (850)    (850) (1,914) (2,764)  23   (850)    (850) (1,914) (2,764)

      Non-controlling interests preferred return

                (78) (78)          (78) (78)

      Preferred stock dividends

              (3,273) (3,273)  (3,273)        (3,273) (3,273)  (3,273)

      Common stock cash distributions ($1.79 per share)

              (54,512) (54,512)  (54,512)        (54,512) (54,512)  (54,512)
                                                    

      Balance—December 31, 2012

       2,000 30,544 $38,500 $305 $510,236 $724,033 $152 $(810,125)$463,101 $7 $463,108  2,000 30,544 38,500 305 510,236 724,033 152 (810,125) 463,101 7 463,108 
                                                    

      Reclassification adjustment

             (35)  (35)  (35)

      Issuance of common stock

        4,152  42 175,556    175,598  175,598 

      Issued restricted stock

        35          

      Net income

            57,815   57,815  57,815 

      Vested restricted stock

           2,591    2,591  2,591 

      Stock option exercises

        22   523    523  523 

      Non-controlling interests preferred return

                (7) (7)

      Preferred stock dividends

              (3,272) (3,272)  (3,272)

      Common stock cash distributions ($1.91 per share)

              (63,631) (63,631)  (63,631)

      Other

        (7)   (252)    (252)  (252)
                             

      Balance—December 31, 2013

       2,000 34,746 $38,500 $347 $688,654 $781,848 $117 $(877,028)$632,438 $ $632,438 
                             
                             

      See accompanying notes.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

      (In thousands)


       Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 

       2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

      OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

              

      Net income

       $51,327 $49,443 $46,053  $57,815 $51,327 $49,443 

      Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

              

      Depreciation and amortization—continuing and discontinued operations

       22,153 19,623 16,109  24,706 22,153 19,623 

      Stock-based compensation expense

       1,819 1,467 1,285  2,591 1,819 1,467 

      Gain on sale of assets, net

       (16)  (310) (1,605) (16)  

      Straight-line rental income—continuing and discontinued operations(1)

       (3,264) (3,728) (3,822) (3,955) (3,264) (3,728)

      (Recovery) provisions for doubtful accounts

       (101) (13) 2,010 

      Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

       2,180 (101) (13)

      Non-cash interest related to earn-out liabilities

       439 464   256 439 464 

      Capitalized interest

       (932) (130) (45)

      Other non-cash items, net

       1,330 1,299 881  1,441 1,460 1,344 

      Decrease in interest receivable

       535 56 95  32 535 56 

      Increase in accrued interest payable

       1,923 681 573  145 1,923 681 

      Net change in other assets and liabilities

       545 1,167 2,101  3,519 545 1,167 
                    

      Net cash provided by operating activities

       76,690 70,459 64,975  86,193 76,690 70,459 
                    

      INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

              

      Investment in real estate properties, net

       (166,750) (100,294) (94,250) (19,040) (166,750) (96,294)

      Investment in real estate developments, net

       (9,957) (50)   (23,605) (9,957) (50)

      Investment in real estate capital improvements, net

       (1,132) (3,135) (5,824) (6,992) (1,132) (3,135)

      Proceeds from sale of real estate investments, net

       1,271  4,864  11,001 1,271  

      Investment in real estate mortgages

       (7,719)  (1,694) (129,358) (7,719)  

      Principal payments received on mortgage loans receivable

       21,633 5,967 8,403  1,933 21,633 5,967 

      Proceeds from redemption of marketable securities

       6,500     6,500  

      Advances under notes receivable

       (2,930) (232) (100) (1,004) (2,930) (232)

      Principal payments received on notes receivable

       569 731 1,573  3,110 569 731 
                    

      Net cash used in investing activities

       (158,515) (97,013) (87,028) (163,955) (158,515) (93,013)
                    

      FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

              

      Bank borrowings

       153,500 167,600 83,700  93,000 153,500 167,600 

      Repayment of bank borrowings

       (94,000) (149,300) (59,500) (187,500) (94,000) (149,300)

      Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes

       85,800 50,000 50,000  70,000 85,800 50,000 

      Principal payments on mortgage loan payable and bonds payable

       (565) (530) (8,180) (600) (565) (530)

      Debt issue costs

       (1,426) (2,286) (718)

      Payment of earn-out liabilities

       (7,000)  (4,000)

      Proceeds from common stock offering

        103,631 67,793  176,260  103,631 

      Stock option exercises

       1,926 120 182  523 1,926 120 

      Distributions paid to stockholders

       (57,785) (56,572) (53,902) (66,904) (57,785) (56,572)

      Redemption of preferred stock

        (88,413) (59,065)   (88,413)

      Redemption of non-controlling interests

       (2,764)     (2,764)  

      Distributions paid to non-controlling interests

       (78) (191) (210) (7) (78) (191)

      Financing costs paid

       (171) (1,426) (2,286)

      Other

       (252)   
                    

      Net cash provided by financing activities

       84,608 24,059 20,100  77,349 84,608 20,059 
                    

      Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

       2,783 (2,495) (1,953)

      (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

       (413) 2,783 (2,495)

      Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

       4,408 6,903 8,856  7,191 4,408 6,903 
                    

      Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

       $7,191 $4,408 $6,903  $6,778 $7,191 $4,408 
             
                    

      Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

              

      Interest paid

       $7,452 $5,070 $1,745  $11,398 $7,452 $5,070 

      Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

              

      SeeNote 4: Supplemental Cash Flow Information for further discussion.

              

      (1)
      During 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, we recorded $22, $131, $238, and $342,$238, respectively, in straight-line rental income from a lessee that qualifies as a related party because the lessee's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

      See accompanying notes.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      1. The Company

              LTC Properties, Inc. (or LTC), a Maryland corporation, commenced operations on August 25, 1992. LTC is a real estate investment trust (or REIT) that invests primarily in senior housing and long term care properties through property lease transactions, mortgage loans and other investments.

      2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

              Basis of Presentation.    The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LTC, our wholly-owned subsidiaries and our controlled partnership.partnership, prior to its liquidation in 2013. All intercompany investments, accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Control over the partnership iswas based on the provisions of the partnership agreement that providesprovided us with a controlling financial interest in the partnership. Under the terms of the partnership agreement, we, as the general partner, arewere responsible for the management of the partnership's assets, business and affairs. Our rights and duties in management of the partnership includeincluded making all operating decisions, setting the capital budget, executing all contracts, making all employment decisions, and handling the purchase and disposition of assets, among others. We, as the general partner, arewere responsible for the ongoing, major, and central operations of the partnership and makemade all management decisions. In addition, we, as the general partner, assumeassumed the risk for all operating losses, capital losses, and arewere entitled to substantially all capital gains (appreciation).

              The Financial Accounting Standard Board (or FASB) created a framework for evaluating whether a general partner or a group of general partners controls a limited partnership or a managing member or a group of managing members controls a limited liability company and therefore should consolidate the entity. The guidance states that the presumption of general partner or managing member control would be overcome only when the limited partners or non-managing members have certain specific rights as described in the guidance. The limited partners havehad virtually no rights and arewere precluded from taking part in the operation, management or control of the partnership. The limited partners arewere also precluded from transferring their partnership interests without the expressed permission of the general partner. However, we cancould transfer our interest without consultation or permission of the limited partners. We consolidate ourconsolidated the partnership in accordance with the guidance.

              The FASB requires the classification of non-controlling interests as a component of consolidated equity in the consolidated balance sheet subject to the provisions of the rules governing classification and measurement of redeemable securities. The guidance requires consolidated net income to be reported at the amounts attributable to both the controlling and non-controlling interests. The calculation of earnings per share will be based on income amounts attributable to the controlling interest. Also, this guidance addresses accounting and reporting for a change in control of a subsidiary.

              Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation, including changes as a result of the application of accounting guidance for properties disposed properties or classified as held-for-sale. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we sold a 47-bed skilled nursing property located in Colorado for $1,000. Additionally, we sold six skilled nursing properties with a total of 230 beds for $11,000,000. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold a 140-bed skilled nursing property located in Texas for $1,248,000 and recognized a gain, net of selling expenses, of $16,000. This property was leased under a master lease and the economic terms of this master lease did not change as a result of this sale. The gain related to the sale and depreciation of the property have been reclassified to discontinued operations for 2012 and all prior periods. During 2012, we also reclassified a 140-unit independent living property located in Texas from held-for-sale to held-for-use. Depreciation expense, which was not recognized during the held-for-sale period, was recognized through a catch-up adjustment at the date of reclassification. ThisDue to the market conditions, the timing of the ultimate disposal of this property is uncertain. These adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of our property sales.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      resulted in an increase of depreciation expense of $285,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012. Due to the market conditions, the timing of the ultimate disposal of this property is uncertain.

              The FASB addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of another entity. The guidance requires that we consolidate a "variable interest entity" if we are determined to be the primary beneficiary of the equity. The guidance also requires disclosure about "variable interest entities" that we are not required to consolidate but in which we have a significant variable interest. We believe that as of December 31, 2012,2013, we do not have investments in any entities that meet the definition of a "variable interest entity."

              Use of Estimates.    Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

              Cash Equivalents.    Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased and are stated at cost which approximates market.

              Owned Properties.    We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land and buildings and, for certain of our acquisitions, in-place leases and other intangible assets. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in-place leases, the appraisers make best estimates based on the evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. These assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases. We evaluate each purchase transaction to determine whether the acquired assets meet the definition of a business. Transaction costs related to acquisitions that are not deemed to be businesses are included in the cost basis of the acquired assets, while transaction costs related to acquisitions that are deemed to be businesses are expensed as incurred.

              We capitalize direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate asset. We capitalize construction and development costs while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. We consider a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred. For redevelopment, renovation and expansion of existing operating properties, we capitalize the cost for the construction and improvement incurred in connection with the redevelopment, renovation and expansion. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

              Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years for computers, 75 to 15 years



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      for furniture and equipment, 35 to 45 years for buildings, 10 to 20 years for building improvements and the respective lease term for acquired lease intangibles.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              Mortgage Loans Receivable.    Mortgage loans receivable we originate are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Mortgage loans we acquire are recorded at fair value at the time of purchase net of any related premium or discount which is amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan.

              Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.    We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of our receivables and is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our receivables. In determining the allowance we perform a quarterly evaluation of all receivables. If this evaluation indicates that there is a greater risk of receivable charge-offs, additional allowances are recorded in current period earnings. During the fourth quarter of 2013, we wrote-off an $878,000 straight-line rent receivable balance related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.

              Impairments.    Assets that are classified as held for use are periodically evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired or the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows. Management assesses the impairment of properties individually and impairment losses are calculated as the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value of assets as of the measurement date. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value and other estimates of fair value such as estimated discounted future cash flows.

              Also, we evaluate the carrying values of mortgage loans receivable on an individual basis. Management periodically evaluates the realizability of future cash flows from the mortgage loan receivable when events or circumstances, such as the non-receipt of principal and interest payments and/or significant deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, indicate that the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized in current period earnings and is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable and the discounted cash flows expected to be received, or if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the mortgage.

              Fair Value of Financial Instruments.    The FASB requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Accordingly, the aggregate fair market value amounts presented in the notes to these consolidated financial statements do not represent our underlying carrying value in financial instruments.

              The FASB provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The FASB emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the FASB establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices).

              The fair value guidance issued by the FASB excludes accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement. However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases.

              In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.

              The FASB requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. SeeNote 16. Fair Value Measurements for the disclosure about fair value of our financial instruments.

              Investments.    Investments in marketable debt and equity securities are categorized as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, reported in other comprehensive income until realized. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in net income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in interest and other income. Our investment in marketable debt securities is classified as held-to-maturity because we have the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity.

              ASC No. 320,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities, requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a debt security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized as impairment through earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) other-than-temporary impairment (or OTTI) related to other factors such as an entity's ability to make scheduled interest or principal payments on the debt securities, which is recognized in other comprehensive income and 2) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement. The credit loss is determined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

              Revenue Recognition.    Interest income on mortgage loans is recognized using the effective interest method. We follow a policy related to mortgage interest whereby we consider a loan to be non-performing after 60 days of non-payment of amounts due and do not recognize unpaid mortgage interest income from that loan until the past due amounts have been received.

              Rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of four methods depending on specific provisions of each lease as follows:

        (i)
        a specified annual increase over the prior year's rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

        (ii)
        a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

        (iii)
        as a percentage of facility net patient revenues in excess of base amounts or

        (iv)
        specific dollar increases.

              The FASB does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. We consider the operating history of the lessee and the general condition of the industry when evaluating whether all possible contingencies have been eliminated and have historically, and expect in the future, to not include contingent rents as income until received. We follow a policy related to rental income whereby we consider a lease to be non-performing after 60 days of non-payment of past due amounts and do not recognize unpaid rental income from that lease until the amounts have been received.

              Rental revenues relating to non-contingent leases that contain specified rental increases over the life of the lease are recognized on the straight-line basis. Recognizing income on a straight-line basis requires us to calculate the total non-contingent rent containing specified rental increases over the life of the lease and to recognize the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-line rent receivable asset included in our consolidated balance sheet. At some point during the lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight-line rent which results in the straight-line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of the lease term. We assess the collectability of straight-line rent in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and our reserve policy. If the lessee becomes delinquent in rent owed under the terms of the lease, we may provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recoverable.

              Net loan fee income and commitment fee income are amortized over the life of the related loan. Costs associated with leases are deferred and allocated over the lease term in proportion to the recognition of rental income.

              Federal Income Taxes.    LTC qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and as such, no provision for Federal income taxes has been made. A REIT is required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders and a REIT may deduct dividends in computing taxable income. If a REIT distributes 100% of its taxable income and complies with other Internal Revenue Code requirements, it will generally not be subject to Federal income taxation.

              For Federal tax purposes, depreciation is generally calculated using the straight-line method over a period of 27.5 years. Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to stockholders, use the straight-line method over 40 years. Both Federal taxable income and earnings and profits differ from net income for financial statement purposes principally due to the treatment of certain interest income, rental income, other expense items, impairment charges and the depreciable lives and basis of assets. At December 31, 2012,2013, the booktax basis of our net depreciable assets exceeds our taxbook basis by approximately $92,396,000$22,680,000 (unaudited), primarily due to additional depreciation takenan investment recorded as an acquisition for tax purposes.and a mortgage loan for GAAP.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              The FASB clarified the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The guidance utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when a company concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) is only addressed if step one has been satisfied (i.e., the position is more likely than not to be sustained). Under step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit (determined on a cumulative probability basis) that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. We currently do not have any uncertain tax positions that would not be sustained on its technical merits on a more-likely than not basis.

              We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by certain tax jurisdictions. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in our consolidated financial statements as General and administrative expenses.

              Concentrations of Credit Risks.    Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, mortgage loans receivable, marketable debt securities and operating leases on owned properties. Our financial instruments, mortgage loans receivable and operating leases, are subject to the possibility of loss of carrying value as a result of the failure of other parties to perform according to their contractual obligations or changes in market prices which may make the instrument less valuable. We obtain various collateral and other protective rights, and continually monitor these rights, in order to reduce such possibilities of loss. In addition, we provide reserves for potential losses based upon management's periodic review of our portfolio. SeeNote 3. Major Operators for further discussion of concentrations of credit risk from our tenants.

              Discontinued Operations.    Properties classified as held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet include only those properties available for immediate sale in their present condition and for which management believes that it is probable that a sale of the property will be completed within one year. Accordingly, we record reclassification adjustments to reflect properties sold subsequent to the respective consolidated balance sheet date as held-for-sale in the prior period consolidated balance sheet. Properties held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. No depreciation expense is recognized on properties held-for-sale once they have been classified as such. The operating results of real estate assets designated as held-for-sale are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income. In addition, all gains and losses from real estate sold are also included in discontinued operations. For comparative purposes, as required by the FASB accounting guidance, the prior years' operating results of sold and held-for-sale real estate assets have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the consolidated income statement for the prior years.

              Net Income Per Share.    Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period excluding common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents.

              In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the determination of whether instruments granted in share-based payments transactions are participating securities, we have applied the two-class method of computing basic earnings per share. This guidance clarifies that outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common stockholders and are considered participating securities.

              Stock-Based Compensation.    The FASB requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      We use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees. This model requires management to make certain estimates including stock volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected term. If management incorrectly estimates these variables, the results of operations could be affected. The FASB also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow. Because we qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we are generally not subject to Federal income taxation. Therefore, this reporting requirement does not have an impact on our statement of cash flows.

              Segment Disclosures.    The FASB accounting guidance regarding disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information establishes standards for the manner in which public business enterprises report information about operating segments. Our investment decisions in senior housing and long term care properties, including mortgage loans, property lease transactiontransactions and other investments, are made and resulting investments are managed as a single operating segment for internal reporting and for internal decision-making purposes. Therefore, we have concluded that we operate as a single segment.

      Impact of New Accounting Pronouncement.

              In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (or ASU 2013-02). This update requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 on January 1, 2013 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

      3. Major Operators

              We have threefour operators from each of which we derive over 10% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. Additionally, we have one operator from which we would have derived over 10% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans if we had a full year of interest income from a mortgage loan we originated during the fourth quarter of 2013.

              Senior Care Centers, LLC (or Senior Care) is a privately held company. During 2013, we entered into an amended and restated master lease agreement with Senior Care to include four skilled nursing properties which were previously operated by and subleased to Senior Care. Under the new amended and restated master lease agreement, Senior Care leases nine skilled nursing properties with a total of 1,190 beds owned by us representing approximately 11.3%, or $104,984,000, of our total assets at December 31, 2013 and 11.3% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013.

              In 2006, Extendicare Services, Inc. (or EHSI), one of our major operators, effected a reorganization whereby it completed a spin-off of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. (or ALC). ALC is now a NYSE traded public company operating assisted living centers. The remaining EHSI assets and operations were converted into a Canadian REIT (or Extendicare(Extendicare REIT) listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. On July 1,Exchange (or TSX). During 2012, Extendicare REIT converted from an income trust structure to a corporate structure under a corporation named Extendicare, Inc. (or Extendicare). Both Extendicare and ALC continue to be parties to the leases with us. On July 11, 2013,



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      ALC merged with Aid Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (or Aid Holdings), and Aid Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aid Holdings (or Aid Merger Sub). Aid Holdings and Aid Merger Sub are affiliates of TPG Capital, L.P.

              Extendicare and ALC collectively lease 37 assisted living properties with a total of 1,430 units owned by us representing approximately 6.8%5.5%, or $53,403,000,$51,299,000, of our total assets at December 31, 20122013 and 11.8%10.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized duringfor the year ended December 31, 2012.2013. The Extendicare and ALC master lease expires on December 31, 2014. In January 2014, we retained CS Capital Advisors, LLC, as our advisors, to assist in the marketing and re-leasing process of these properties.

              Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. (or Brookdale Communities) is a wholly owned subsidiary of a publicly traded company, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (or Brookdale). Brookdale Communities leases 35 assisted living properties with a total of 1,414 units owned by us representing approximately 6.8%5.5%, or $53,525,000,$51,581,000, of our total assets at December 31, 20122013 and 11.5%10.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized duringfor the year ended December 31, 2012.2013.

              Preferred Care, Inc. (or Preferred Care), through various wholly owned subsidiaries, operates 27 skilled nursing properties and two range of care properties that we own or on which we hold a mortgagemortgages secured by first trust deed.deeds. These properties consist of a total of 3,354 skilled nursing beds and 49 assisted living units. This represents approximately 6.7%5.4%, or $52,550,000,$50,132,000, of our total assets at December 31, 20122013 and 11.6%10.2% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized duringfor the year ended December 31, 2012.2013. They also operate one skilled nursing property under a sub-lease with another lessee we have which is not included in the Preferred Care rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)        Prestige Healthcare is a privately held company. In October 2013, we funded a $124,387,000 mortgage loan with Prestige Healthcare secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,092 beds. They also lease two range of care properties with a total of 118 skilled nursing beds and 93 assisted living units owned by us with an asset value of $10,967,000. Additionally, they manage four parcels of land that we own with an asset value of $1,163,000. These assets represent 14.7% or $136,517,000 of our total assets at December 31, 2013 and generated 3.1% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013 (or 11.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans for the year ended December 31, 2013 assuming we held the mortgage for the full year of 2013).

              Our financial position and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by Extendicare, ALC, Brookdale Communities, Extendicare, ALC, Preferred Care, Senior Care, Prestige Healthcare, or any of our lessees and borrowers, including any bankruptcies, inability to emerge from bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in business of any such operator, or in the event any such operator does not renew and/or extend its relationship with us or our borrowers when it expires.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      4. Supplemental Cash Flow Information


       For the year ended
      December 31,
        For the year ended
      December 31,
       

       2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

       (in thousands)
        (in thousands)
       

      Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

              

      Conversion of mortgage loans to owned properties

       $ $ $2,900 

      Acquisition of real estate investments

        5,975(1)   $ $ $5,975(1)

      Capitalized interest

       130 45 117  932 130 45 

      Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

         823 

      Redemption of non-controlling interest

       396     396  

      Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations

       1  2   1  

      (1)
      We purchased four skilled nursing properties with 524-beds in Texas for $50,841 which consists of $41,000 in cash at closing with the remainder in the form of contingent earn-out payments. The contingent earn-out payment arrangements require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $11,000 upon the properties achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio.if certain operational thresholds are met. During 2013 and 2011, we paid $7,000 and $4,000, respectively, related to the first contingent earn-out paymentpayments which hashave been included in the line itemInvestment in real estate properties, netPayment of earn-out liabilities on our consolidated statement of cash flows. SeeNote 11. Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion.

      5. Impairment

              No impairment charges on our real estate investments held and used and on our mortgage loans receivable were recorded during 2013, 2012 2011 or 2010.2011. However in past years, the long term care industry experienced significant adverse changes which resulted in operating losses by certain of our lessees and borrowers and in some instances the filing by certain lessees and borrowers for bankruptcy protection. Thus, we cannot predict what, if any, impairment charges may be needed in the future.

      6. Real Estate Investments

              Any reference to the number of properties, number of schools, number of units, number of beds, and yield on investments in real estate are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm's audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              Owned Properties.    The following table summarizes our investment in owned properties at December 31, 20122013 (dollar amounts in thousands):


        
        
        
       Number of  
         
        
        
       Number of  
       

        
        
        
       Average
      Investment
      per
      Bed/Unit
         
        
        
       Average
      Investment
      per
      Bed/Unit
       
      Type of Property
       Gross
      Investments
       Percentage
      of
      Investments
       Number
      of
      Properties(1)
       SNF
      Beds
       ALF
      Units
        Gross
      Investments
       Percentage
      of
      Investments
       Number
      of
      Properties(1)
       SNF
      Beds
       ALF
      Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $438,388 48.7% 71 8,211  $53.39  $458,759 48.9% 68 8,264  $55.51 

      Assisted Living

       379,869 42.2% 96  4,502 84.38  399,912 42.7% 98  4,641 $86.17 

      Range of Care

       52,870 5.9% 10 814 318 46.70  43,907 4.7% 8 634 274 $48.36 

      Under Development(2)

       16,642 1.8%      21,432 2.3%     

      School

       12,326 1.4% 2    

      Other(3)

       13,607 1.4% 2    
                                

      Totals

       $900,095 100.0% 179 9,025 4,820    $937,617 100.0% 176 8,898 4,915   
                                
                   

      (1)
      We have investments in 2627 states leased to 3533 different operators.
      (2)
      Includes three MC developments with a total of 168 units, a combination ALF and MC development with a total of 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
      (3)
      Includes two schools properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.


      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              Owned properties are leased pursuant to non-cancelable operating leases generally with an initial term of 10 to 15 years. Each lease is a triple net lease which requires the lessee to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, capital and non-capital expenditures and other costs necessary in the operations of the facilities. Many of the leases contain renewal options. The leases provide for fixed minimum base rent during the initial and renewal periods. The majority of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year that are generally computed in one of four ways depending on specific provisions of each lease:

        (i)
        a specified annual increase over the prior year's rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

        (ii)
        a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

        (iii)
        as a percentage of facility net patient revenues in excess of base amounts or

        (iv)
        specific dollar increases.

              We received no contingent rent income for the year ended December 31, 2013. Contingent rent income for the years ended December 31, 2012 2011 and 20102011 was not significant in relation to contractual base rent income.

              The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2013(dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing(1)

       $14,402 $58 $14,460  1  120 

      Land(2)

        4,638    4,638     
                  

      Totals

       $19,040 $58 $19,098  1  120 
                  
                  

      (1)
      A skilled nursing property located in Florida which was added to a master lease at an incremental initial cash yield of 8.75%.
      (2)
      We purchased three vacant parcels of land in Colorado for a total of $3,475 under a pipeline agreement whereby we have the opportunity to finance any senior housing development project or acquisition originated by an operator through May 2018 (unless earlier terminated as provided for therein). The land was added to an existing master lease and we entered into development commitments in an amount not to exceed $30,256 to fund the construction of three memory care properties, two with 60 units and the other with 48 units. We also purchased four parcels of land held-for-use in Michigan for $1,163.

              During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, one of our lessees exercised its option to purchase six skilled nursing properties located in Ohio with a total of 230 beds for an all cash purchase price of $11,000,000. As a result, we recorded a $2,619,000 gain on sale. Also, during 2013, we sold a 47-bed skilled nursing property in Colorado for $1,000 and recognized a loss of $1,014,000 on the sale.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we completed the following construction projects:

      Completed
      Date
       Type of Property Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       State Completed Date 2013 Funding Total Funding 

      Jul 2013

       Assisted Living(1)  60  Colorado  Jul 2013 $4,316 $9,850 

      Jul 2013

       Skilled Nursing(2)  120  Texas  Jul 2013  5,065  8,635 

      Oct 2013

       Assisted Living(3)  77  Kansas  Oct 2013  8,081  9,675(3)
                      

       Totals  257       $17,462 $28,160 
                      
                      

      (1)
      This new property is a Memory Care property. The funded amount includes acquired land of $1,882.
      (2)
      This new property replaces a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio.
      (3)
      The funded amount includes acquired land of $730.

              We have a commitment to provide, under certain conditions, up to $5,000,000 per year through December 2014 to an existing operator for expansion of the 37 properties they lease from us. The estimated yield of this commitment is 9.5% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the five days prior to funding, minus 420 basis points. As of December 31, 2013, no funds have been requested under this commitment.

              Excluding the $5,000,000 per year commitment above, the following table summarizes our investment commitments as of December 31, 2013 and year to date funding on our development, redevelopment, renovation, and expansion projects(excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Investment
      Commitment
       2013
      Funding(2)
       Commitment
      Funded
       Remaining
      Commitment
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $29,650 $7,221 $12,757 $16,893  6  640 

      Assisted Living(1)

        50,656  9,614  10,661  39,995  7  385 
                    

      Totals

       $80,306 $16,835(3)$23,418 $56,888(3) 13  1,025 
                    
                    

      (1)
      Includes the development of three memory care properties for a total of $30,256, one assisted living and memory care combination property for a total of $5,800, and the expansion of three assisted living properties for a total $14,600.
      (2)
      Excludes funding for completed construction projects shown above and $260 of capital improvement on three completed projects with no remaining commitments. It also includes $6 funded under the commitment as marketing expense, $3,475 of land acquired for development and the reclass of three pre-development loans with a total balance of $479. See Item 7. Notes Receivable for further discussion of the pre-development loans.
      (3)
      In January 2014, we funded $8,828 under investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $48,060.


      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              Our construction in progress (or CIP) activity during the year ended December 31, 2013 for our development, redevelopment, renovation, and expansion projects is as follows(dollar amounts in thousands):

      Properties
       Projects CIP
      Balance at
      12/31/2012
       Funded(1) Capitalized
      Interest
       Conversions
      out of CIP
       CIP
      Balance at
      12/31/2013
       

      Development projects:

                         

      Assisted living

        6 $4,669 $18,584 $510 $(17,429)$6,334 

      Skilled nursing

        1  31  5,551  311    5,893 
                    

      Subtotal

        7  4,700  24,135  821  (17,429) 12,227 

      Redevelopment, renovation and expansion projects:

                         

      Other

        1  6  117    (123)  

      Assisted living

        4  66  21    (79) 8 

      Skilled nursing

        5  3,516  6,730  111  (7,924) 2,433 
                    

      Subtotal

        10  3,588  6,868  111  (8,126) 2,441 
                    

      Total

        17 $8,288 $31,003 $932 $(25,555)$14,668 
                    
                    

      (1)
      Excludes $73 of capital improvement commitment funding which was capitalized directly into building and improvements and includes the reclass of three pre-development loans with a total balance of $479. See Item 7. Notes Receivable for further discussion of the pre-development loans.

              The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2012(dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
        Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing(1)

       $79,100 $275 $79,375 4 522  $79,100 $275 $79,375 4 522 

      Assisted Living(2)

       81,987 285 82,272 5 266  81,987 285 82,272 5 266 

      Land(3)

       5,663 207 5,870    5,663 207 5,870   
                            

      Totals

       $166,750 $767 $167,517 9 788  $166,750 $767 $167,517 9 788 
                            
                 

      (1)
      Includes two skilled nursing properties with a total of 234 beds located in Texas and two skilled nursing properties with a total of 288 beds located in Ohio. The weighted average GAAP rent is 10.3%.
      (2)
      Includes two properties with a total of 100 units located in Colorado and three properties with a total of 166 units located in New Jersey. The weighted average GAAP rent is 8.1%.
      (3)
      We purchased four vacant parcels of land in the following states: Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky and Texas. Simultaneous with the purchase, we entered into lease agreements and development commitments in an amount not to exceed $49,702 to fund the construction of a memory care property with 60 units and two assisted living properties with a total of 158 units and one skilled nursing property with 143 beds. Rents due under the lease will begin upon the earlier of project completion or the improvement deadline specified in the lease. The weighted average initial rent rate is 9.2%.

              The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 assume that the 2012 acquisitions of the above properties were completed as of January 1, 2011 as shown below (in thousands):

       
       For the year ended
      December 31,
       
       
       2012 2011 

      Revenues

       $104,342 $100,636 

      Net Income

       $59,100 $58,686 

              Pro forma data may not be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred as of January 1, 2011, nor does it intend to be a projection of future results.

              The following table summarizes our investment commitments and year to date funding on our development, redevelopment, renovation and expansion projects(excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Investment
      Commitment
       2012
      Funding(2)
       Total
      Funded
       Remaining
      Commitment
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $36,094 $8,310 $9,204 $26,890  6  759 

      Assisted Living(1)

        40,927  8,242  8,242  32,685  6  458 

      Range of Care

        739  66  739    2  211 
                    

      Totals

       $77,760 $16,618(3)$18,185 $59,575  14  1,428 
                    

      (1)
      Includes the development of a 60-unit memory care property for $9,817 and two assisted living and memory care combination properties for a total of $16,385, the expansion of two assisted living properties for a total $14,600 and the renovation of a 140-unit independent living property for $125.
      (2)
      Includes acquired land of $5,663 and excludes $134 of capital improvement funding.
      (3)
      In January and February of 2013, we funded $2,484 and $488, respectively, under investment commitments.


      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              In addition, we committed to fund $5,000,000 per year for the life of a master lease which has a maturity date of December 2014. The estimated yield of this commitment is 9.5% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the five days prior to funding, minus 420 basis points.

              During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold a 140-bed skilled nursing property located in Texas for $1,248,000 and recognized a gain, net of selling expenses, of $16,000. This property was leased under a master lease and the economic terms of this master lease did not change as a result of this sale.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2011(dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
        Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing(1)(2)

       $93,841 $330 $94,171 7 1,016  $93,841 $330 $94,171 7 1,016 

      Range of Care(3)

       11,450 34 11,484 2 211  11,450 34 11,484 2 211 

      Land(4)

       844 11 855    844 11 855   
                            

      Totals

       $106,135 $375 $106,510 9 1,227  $106,135 $375 $106,510 9 1,227 
                            
                 

      (1)
      Includes two skilled nursing properties with a total of 336 beds located in Texas for $25,500 and a 156-bed skilled nursing property located in California for $17,500.
      (2)
      We purchased four skilled nursing properties with 524-beds in Texas for $50,841 which consists of $41,000 in cash at closing with the remainder in the form of contingent earn-out payments. The contingent earn-out payment arrangements require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $11,000 upon the properties achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. During 2013 and 2011, we paid $7,000 and $4,000, respectively, related to the first contingent earn-out payment. SeeNote 11. Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion on the contingent earn-out.
      (3)
      We purchased two senior housing properties located in South Carolina with 118 skilled nursing beds, 40 assisted living units and 53 independent living units for $11,450.
      (4)
      We acquired a vacant parcel of land in Texas for the purpose of building a replacement skilled nursing property for a purchase price of $844.

              The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2010(dollar amounts in thousands):

      Type of Property
       Purchase
      Price
       Transaction
      Costs
       Total
      Acquisition
      Costs
       Number
      of
      Properties
       Number
      of
      Beds/Units
       

      Skilled Nursing

       $54,011(1)$140(2)$54,151  5  668 

      Assisted Living

        26,900  210  27,110  4  241 

      Range of Care

        13,339  (3) 13,339  1  230 
                  

      Totals

       $94,250 $350 $94,600  10  1,139 
                  

      (1)
      Includes three skilled nursing properties with a total of 458 beds located in Texas, a 120-bed skilled nursing property located in Florida, and a 90-bed skilled nursing property located in Virginia.
      (2)
      Includes a $125 lease inducement payment which is amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease.
      (3)
      We purchased this range of care property along with a 90-bed skilled nursing property for $22,000 and incurred $7 in transaction costs. The transaction costs for this acquisition are included in the skilled nursing property transaction costs above.

              During the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we invested $3,185,000 and $5,824,000 under agreements to develop new properties and redevelop, renovate and expand existing leased properties. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we sold a 195-bed skilled nursing property located in



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      Virginia to the lessee under a purchase option for $4,935,000. As a result, we received net cash proceeds of $4,864,000 and recognized a gain net of selling expenses of $310,000.

              Depreciation expense on buildings and improvements, including properties classified as held-for-sale, was $24,568,000, $22,002,000, $19,487,000, and $16,016,000$19,487,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and 2010.respectively.

              Future minimum base rents receivable under the remaining non-cancelable terms of operating leases excluding the four assisted living properties being transitioned to a new lessee, as previously discussed inNote 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and assuming the Extendicare and ALC master leases are not re-leased at maturity in December 2014, as previously discussed inNote 3. Major Operators, and excluding the effects of straight-line rent and extension options are as follows ((in thousands)thousands):


       Annual Cash
      Rent
        Annual Cash
      Rent
       

      2013

       $95,425 

      2014

       96,222  $97,132 

      2015

       83,163  85,132 

      2016

       82,861  85,393 

      2017

       82,529  84,688 

      2018

       81,028 

      Thereafter

       422,329  374,524 


      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

              Set forth in the table below are the components of the lossincome from discontinued operations (in thousands):


       For the year ended
      December 31,
        For the year ended
      December 31,
       

       2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

      Rental income

       $ $ $404  $1,123 $1,551 $1,547 

      Interest and other income

          
                    

      Total revenues

         404  1,123 1,551 1,547 

      Depreciation and amortization

        (99) (256) 
      (317

      )
       
      (540

      )
       
      (712

      )

      Provisions for doubtful accounts

          

      General and administrative expenses

           (1) (6) (12)
                    

      Total expenses

           (318) (546) (724)
                    

      (Loss) income from discontinued operations

        $(99)$148 

      Income from discontinued operations

       $805 $1,005 $823 
                    
             

      Mortgage Loans.The following table summarizes our investments in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages at December 31, 20122013 (dollar amounts in thousands):


        
        
        
        
       Number of  
         
        
        
        
       Number of  
       
      Type of Property
       Gross
      Investments
       Percentage
      of
      Investments
       Number
      of
      Loans
       Number
      of
      Properties(1)
       SNF
      Beds
       ALF
      Units
       Investment
      per
      Bed/Unit
        Gross
      Investments
       Percentage
      of
      Investments
       Number
      of
      Loans
       Number
      of
      Properties(1)
       SNF
      Beds
       ALF
      Units
       Investment
      per
      Bed/Unit
       

      Skilled Nursing(2)

       $24,931 62.2% 16 17 1,861  $13.40  $152,401 91.2% 16 32 3,953  $38.55 

      Assisted Living

       12,288 30.7% 3 8  211 $58.24  12,112 7.2% 3 8  211 $57.40 

      Range of Care

       2,862 7.1% 1 1 99 74 $16.54  2,602 1.6% 1 1 99 74 $15.04 
                                    

      Totals

       $40,081 100.0% 20 26 1,960 285    $167,115 100.0% 20 41 4,052 285   
                                    
                     

      (1)
      We have investments in 9 states that include mortgages to 12 different operators.
      (2)
      Includes a mortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.

              At December 31, 2012,2013, the mortgage loans had interest rates ranging from 7.0% to 13.5%13.6% and maturities ranging from 2014 to 2019.2043. In addition, thesome loans contain certain guarantees, provide for



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      certain facility fees and generally have 20-year to 25-year30-year amortization schedules. The majority of the mortgage loans provide for annual increases in the interest rate based upon a specified increase of 10 to 25 basis points. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the carrying values of the mortgage loans were $39,299,000 and $53,081,000, respectively. Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loans are as follows(in thousands):

       
       Scheduled
      Principal
       

      2013

       $1,933 

      2014

        14,244 

      2015

        4,272 

      2016

        2,195 

      2017

        6,118 

      Thereafter

        11,319 

              During the year ended December 2012,31, 2013, we originatedfunded a $5,100,000 two-year interest-only bridge loan.$124,387,000 mortgage loan with a third-party operator, Prestige Healthcare, secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,092 beds in Michigan. The loan is secured byfor a 70-unit assisted living property in Pennsylvaniaterm of 30 years and bears interest at 7.0% increasing9.53% for five years, escalating annually thereafter by 1.5%2.25%. WePayments are interest-only for three years, after which the borrower will make interest payments along with annual principal payments of $1,000,000. The loan agreement provides for additional forward commitments of $12,000,000 for capital improvements at 9.41% for the first twelve months. Beginning in the thirteenth month, the interest will be the greater of 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding or 9.0% with annual escalations of 2.25%. The loan agreement also originatedprovides, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, for additional loan proceeds of up to $40,000,000 with such proceeds limited to $10,000,000 per twelve months. The term for the additional loan proceeds will be at the greater of 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding or 9.0% with annual escalations of 2.25%.

              The borrower has a one-time option between the third and twelfth years to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. Exclusively for the purposes of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from portfolio of properties securing the loan. If the prepayment option is exercised and timely concluded, the borrower forfeits its opportunity to access any additional loan proceeds. Additionally, under certain circumstances, including a change in regulatory environment, we have the option to purchase the properties.

              During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we funded $4,971,000 and $2,619,000, respectively, under a $10,600,000 mortgage and construction loan that originated during 2012. This loan is secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and a vacant parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement facility will beis being constructed. The term is 10 years and the interest rate is 9.0% increasing 25 basis points annually. Thethe greater of 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding, but no less than 9.25% with annual escalations of 0.25%.The agreement gives us the right to purchase the replacement facility for $13,500,000 during an 18 month period beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. If the purchase option is exercised, the replacement facility will be added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option is exercised. As of December 31, 2012, we funded $2,619,000 of loan proceeds and2013, we have a remaining commitment of $7,981,000 on this mortgage and construction loan. In January and February of 2013, we funded $776,000 and $128,000, respectively,$3,010,000 under this loan. During the year ended 2012, we also originated a $5,100,000 two-year interest-only bridge loan. The loan is secured by a 70-unit assisted living property in Pennsylvania and bears interest at 7.0% increasing annually by 1.5%.

              At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the carrying values of the mortgage loans were $165,444,000 and construction$39,299,000, respectively. Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loan receivables are as follows(in thousands):

       
       Scheduled
      Principal
       

      2014

       $14,244 

      2015

        4,272 

      2016

        2,695 

      2017

        7,118 

      2018

        8,233 

      Thereafter

        130,553 
          

      Total

       $167,115 
          
          

              During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we have a remaining commitment of $7,077,000.

      received $1,933,000, $2,572,000, and $3,136,000, respectively in regularly scheduled principal payments. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we received $2,572,000 in regularly scheduled principal payments and we received $19,061,000 plus accrued interest related to the early payoff of eleven mortgage loans secured by four skilled nursing properties and seven assisted living properties.

      During the year ended December 31, 2011, we received $3,136,000 in regularly scheduled principal payments and we received $2,831,000 plus accrued interest related to the payoff of four mortgage loans secured by one assisted living property and seven skilled nursing properties.

              During the year ended December 31, 2010, we received $3,904,000 plus accrued interest related to the payoff of five mortgage loans secured by five skilled nursing properties. We invested $72,000 in a mortgage loan for capital improvements and $1,622,000 in a mortgage loan secured by a skilled nursing property to finance an expansion of the property and extend the loan maturity for an additional five years. We received $4,499,000 in regularly scheduled principal payments

              Also, during the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded a $1,235,000 provision for doubtful accounts charge for two mortgage loans (one secured by a private school property in Minnesota and one secured by land in Oklahoma). We acquired the school property via deed-in-lieu of foreclosure as a result of the borrower filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. During 2011, we leased the school to a non-for-profit corporation providing therapeutic support and intensive home, school and center-based behavioral therapy for children, youth and families affected by Autism Spectrum Disorders.



      LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

      NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      7. Notes Receivable

              During 2012,2013, we funded $663,000 under areceived $3,035,000 for the early repayment of two loans with interest rates ranging from 8.5% to 9.0% construction and term loan for capital improvements at one skilled nursing property we own and lease to the borrower. This loan will fully amortize to maturity in May 2018. During 2012, we also funded $2,267,000 under an 8.5% construction and term loan for capital improvements at two senior housing properties we own and lease to the borrower. This loan will fully amortize to maturity in November 2017.

              At December 31, 2012,. Also during 2013, we committed to provide $1,400,000fund three loans up to $400,000 each with interest at 12%. Two of these loans mature in loanSeptember 2017 and one matures in December 2017. We also committed to fund three pre-development loans of $325,000 each to facilitate the site selection and pre-construction services for the future development of three memory care properties. The initial rate of each of these pre-development loans is 12%, increasing by 25 basis points per year. Each of these pre-development loans matured due to the acquisition of the land and the outstanding balance of $479,000 was reclassified to real estate under development during 2013.

              As of December 31, 2013, we have seven loans and line of credit agreements to certain operators. Aswith a total commitment of December 31, 2012, we had funded $20,000 under these commitments$2,425,000 and have a remaining commitment balance of $1,380,000. These loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 9.0% to 12.0% and maturities ranging from 2013 to 2014.

      $1,830,000. The following table summarizes the number of loans outstanding, the weighted average interest rate of these loans is 11.5%. During 2013, 2012, and the carrying value as of December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 and notes receivablewe received principal payments, receivedincluding loan payoffs, of $3,110,000, $569,000, and $731,000, respectively, and we advanced for the years 2012, 2011,principal of $1,004,000, $2,930,000, and 2010(dollar amounts in thousands):$232,000, respectively.

       
       Number
      of Loans
       Weighted
      Average
      Interest
      Rate
       Carrying
      Value
       Principal
      Payments
      Received
       Principal
      Advanced
       

      2012

        5  8.7%$3,180 $569 $(2,930)

      2011

        6  10.0% 817  731  (232)

      2010

        5  11.9% 1,283  1,573  (100)

      8. Marketable Securities

              During the year ended December 31, 2012, Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (or SHG) redeemed all of itstheir outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes at par value plus accrued and unpaid interest.interest up to the redemption date. The SHG Senior Subordinated Notes had a face rate of 11.0% and an effective yield of 11.1%. At December 31, 2011,During 2012, we had arecognized $235,000 of interest income from our $6,500,000 face value investment in SHG Senior Subordinated Notes. One of our board members iswas the chief executive officer of SHG.SHG until his retirement on November 20, 2013. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

      9. Debt Obligations

              Bank Borrowings.    During 2012, we amended our Unsecured Credit Agreement increasing the commitment to $240,000,000 with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $350,000,000. Additionally, the drawn pricing was decreased by 25 basis points, the undrawn pricing was decreased by 10 basis points and the maturity of the facility was extended for one additional year to May 25, 2016. The amendment also provides for a one-year extension option at our discretion, subject to customary conditions. Based on our leverage ratios during 2012,at December 31, 2013, the amended facility provides for interest annually at LIBOR plus 125 basis points and the unused commitment fee was 25 basis points. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we anticipate that the annual interest will increase to LIBOR plus 150 basis points and 30 basis points for the unused commitment fee based on our leverage ratios at December 31, 2012.

              Financial covenants contained in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, which are measured quarterly, require us to maintain, among other things:

        (i)
        a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value not greater than 0.5 to 1.0;

        (ii)
        a ratio of secured debt to total asset value not greater than 0.35 to 1.0;



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

          (iii)
          a ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset pool not greater than 0.6 to 1.0; and

          (iv)
          a ratio of EBITDA, as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, to fixed charges not less than 1.50 to 1.0.

                During 20122013 we borrowed $153,500,000$93,000,000 and repaid $94,000,000$187,500,000 under our Unsecured Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2012,2013, we had $115,500,000$21,000,000 outstanding at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25% and $124,500,000$219,000,000 available for borrowing. DuringIn January 2013,2014, we borrowed $2,000,000$11,500,000 at an



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%. After this borrowing, under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we had $117,500,000have $32,500,000 outstanding and $122,500,000$207,500,000 available for borrowing. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, we were in compliance with all covenants.

                Senior Unsecured Notes.    At December 31, 2012,2013, we had $185,800,000$255,800,000 outstanding under our Senior Unsecured Notes with a weighted average interest rate of 5.2%4.85%. During 2013, we sold to affiliates and managed accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (or individually and collectively Prudential) $70,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.99% senior unsecured term notes fully amortizing to maturity on November 20, 2021. We used the proceeds to pay down our unsecured revolving line of credit.

                On October 30, 2013, we entered into an amended and restated note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential. The shelf agreement with Prudential, as amended, conforms the definitions and financial covenants contained therein and previously issued senior unsecured promissory notes outstanding to Prudential and certain of its affiliates and managed accounts to those contained in our unsecured credit facility and to covenants contained in the senior unsecured notes sold in July 2012. Any notes sold by us to Prudential under the shelf agreement will be in amounts at fixed interest rates and have maturity dates (each note to have a final maturity not greater than 12 years and an average life not greater than 10 years from the date of issuance) subject to further agreement by us and Prudential.

                The shelf agreement with Prudential contains standard covenants including requirements to maintain financial ratios such as debt to asset value ratios. Under the shelf agreement, maximum total indebtedness shall not exceed 50% of total asset value as defined in the shelf agreement, as amended. Borrowings under the shelf agreement are limited by reference to the value of unencumbered assets. Under the shelf agreement, maximum unsecured debt shall not exceed 60% of the value of the unencumbered asset pool as defined in the shelf agreement.

                During 2012, we sold 12-year senior unsecured notes in the aggregate amount of $85,800,000 to a group of institutional investors in a private placement transaction. The notes bear interest at 5.0%, mature on July 19, 2024 and have scheduled annual principal pay downs of $17,160,000 in years 8 through 12. We used a portion of the proceeds to pay down our Unsecured Credit Agreement and used the remaining proceeds to fund acquisitions.

        During 2011, we sold to affiliates and managed accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (individually and collectively "Prudential") $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.80% senior unsecured term notes fully amortizing to maturity on July 20, 2021. Additionally, we entered into an Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf agreement with Prudential which provides for the possible issuance of up to an additional $100,000,000 of senior unsecured fixed-rate term notes through October 19, 2014. Financial covenants contained in the Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf agreement are substantially the same as the financial covenants contained in our Unsecured Credit Agreement.

                During 2010, we sold to Prudential $25,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured term notes due July 14, 2015 and $25,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.74% senior unsecured term notes fully amortizing to maturity on July 14, 2019.

                Bonds Payable.    At December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 we had outstanding principal of $2,635,000$2,035,000 and $3,200,000,$2,635,000, respectively, on multifamily tax-exempt revenue bonds that are secured by five assisted living properties in Washington. These bonds bear interest at a variable rate that is reset weekly and mature during 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, the weighted average interest rate, including letter of credit fees, on the outstanding bonds was 2.2%2.9%. During 20122013 and 20112012 we paid $565,000$600,000 and $530,000,$565,000, respectively, in regularly scheduled principal payments. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the aggregate carrying value of real estate properties securing our bonds payable was $6,650,000$6,386,000 and $6,915,000,$6,650,000, respectively.



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                Scheduled Principal Payments.    The following table represents our long term contractual obligations (scheduled principal payments and amounts due at maturity) as of December 31, 2012,2013, and excludes the effects of interest (in thousands):

         
         Total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter 

        Bank borrowings

         $115,500(1)$ $ $ $115,500 $ $ 

        Senior unsecured notes

          185,800    4,167  29,166  16,667  14,167  121,633 

        Bonds payable

          2,635  600  635  1,400       
                        

         $303,935 $600 $4,802 $30,566 $132,167 $14,167 $121,633 
                        

        (1)
        At December 31, 2012 we had $124,500 available for borrowing under our Unsecured Credit Agreement. During January 2013, we borrowed $2,000 under our Unsecured Credit Agreement. After this borrowing, we had $117,500 outstanding and $122,500 available for borrowing.
         
         Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 

        Bank borrowings

         $21,000 $ $ $21,000 $ $ $ 

        Senior unsecured notes

          255,800  4,167  29,166  26,667  26,167  28,167  141,466 

        Bonds payable

          2,035  635  1,400         
                        

         $278,835 $4,802 $30,566 $47,667 $26,167 $28,167 $141,466 
                        
                        

        10. Equity

                Preferred Stock.    At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, we had 2,000,000 shares of our 8.5% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (or Series C preferred stock) outstanding. Our Series C preferred stock is convertible into 2,000,000 shares of our common stock and dividends are payable quarterly. Total shares reserved for issuance of common stock related to the conversion of Series C preferred stock were 2,000,000 shares at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.

                At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no shares of our 8.5% Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (or Series E preferred stock) outstanding. Our Series E preferred stock was convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $12.50 per share of common stock. During 2010, holders of 32,895 shares of Series E preferred stock elected to convert such shares into 65,790 shares of common stock. During 2010, we redeemed the remaining 4,921 shares of outstanding Series E preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.4191 per share, including accrued and unpaid dividends up to and including the redemption date. Accordingly, we recognized the $6,000 of original issue costs related to the Series E preferred stock as a preferred stock redemption charge which is included in the income statement line itemIncome allocated to preferred stockholders.

                At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no shares of our 8.0% Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock outstanding (or Series F preferred stocks). Our Series F preferred stocks were redeemable by us, at our option, in whole or from time to time in part, for $25.00 per share in cash plus any accrued and unpaid dividends up to the date of redemption. Dividends were cumulative from the date of original issue and were payable quarterly to stockholders of record on the first day of each quarter. During 2011, we redeemed 3,536,530 shares of our Series F preferred stock, representing all of our remaining outstanding shares. The redemption price was $25.1333 per share, including accrued and unpaid dividends. Accordingly, we recognized $3,566,000 in 2011 of original issue costs related to the Series F preferred stock as a preferred stock redemption charge which is included in the income statement line itemIncome allocated to preferred stockholders.

                During 2012, we reclassified all of the authorized but unissued shares of our Series E preferred stock and our Series F preferred stock as authorized but unissued and unclassified shares of our preferred stock. No shares of Series E preferred stock or Series F preferred stock were outstanding immediately prior to the reclassification.



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                While outstanding, the liquidation preferences of each share of preferred stock arepari passu with one another. None have any voting rights, any stated maturity, nor are they subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption.2012.

                Common Stock.    We have anDuring 2013, we sold 4,025,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a price of $44.50 per share, before fees and costs of $7,748,000. The net proceeds of $171,365,000 were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving line of credit, to fund acquisitions and our current development commitments and general corporate purposes. Also, during 2013, we acquired 6,925 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

                During 2013, we terminated the equity distribution agreement which allowsallowed us to issue and sell, from time to time, up to $85,686,000 in aggregate offering price of our common shares. Sales of common shares are made by means of ordinary brokers' transactions at market prices, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed between us and our sales agents. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we sold 126,742 shares of common stock for $4,895,000 in net proceeds under our equity distribution agreement. In conjunction with the sale of common stock, we reclassified $662,000 of accumulated costs associated with the equity distribution agreement to additional paid in capital. During 2012, and 2011, we did not sell shares of our common stock under our equity distribution agreement. At December 31, 2012, we had $64,573,000 available under this equity distribution agreement.

                During 2011, we sold 3,990,000 shares of common stock at a price of $27.25 per share, before fees and costs, in an underwritten public offering. The net proceeds of $103,631,000 were used to redeem all of our Series F preferred stock outstanding, as previously discussed, and the remaining net proceeds were used to partially repay amounts outstanding under our Unsecured Credit Agreement.

                We had a Board of Directors repurchase authorization program enabling us to repurchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our equity securities, including common and preferred stock in the open market. During 2012, our Board of Directors terminated this repurchase authorization. During 2012 and 2011, we did not purchase shares of our equity securities. At December 31, 2011, we had an open Board authorization to purchase 3,360,237 shares in total of equity securities.

                During 2012, we amended our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000 shares. The charter amendment was approved by our stockholders at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders held on May 22, 2012.

                Available Shelf Registrations.Registration.    OurOn July 19, 2013, we filed a Form S-3ASR "shelf" registration statement to replace our prior shelf registration statement. This current shelf registration statement provides us with the capacity to offer up to $400,000,000$800,000,000 in common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt, depositary shares, or units. We may from time to time raise capital under ourthis current shelf registration in amounts, at prices, and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of the offering. At December 31, 20122013 we had availability of $167,614,000$800,000,000 under our effective shelf registration.

                Non-controlling Interests.    We currently have no limited partners. During 2012, and 2011, we had one limited partnership. The limited partnership agreement allowed the limited partners to convert, on a



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        one-for-one basis, their limited partnership units into shares of common stock or the cash equivalent, at our option. Since we exercised control, we consolidated the limited partnership and we carried the non-controlling interests at cost.

                During 2012, two of our limited partners exercised their conversion rights to exchange all of their 112,588 partnership units. At our discretion, we converted 23,294 partnership units into an equal number of our common shares. The partnership conversion price was $17.00 per partnership unit. At our discretion, we elected to satisfy the conversion of 89,294 limited partnership units with cash. We paid the limited partners $2,764,000, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the redemption date plus $0.05 per share multiplied by the number of limited partnership units redeemed. The amount we paid upon redemption exceeded the book value of the limited partnership interest redeemed by $1,246,000. Accordingly, the $1,246,000 excess book value of the limited partners' interest in the partnership was reclassified to stockholders' equity. We accounted for these conversions as an equity transaction because there was no change in control requiring consolidation or deconsolidation and remeasurement. Subsequent to these partnership conversions, the assets held by the limited partnership were transferred to other subsidiaries of the Company and the limited partnership was terminated. At December 31, 2012 and 2013, we had no shares of our common stock reserved under any partnership agreements.



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                The following table represents the effect of changes in our ownership interest in the limited partnership on equity attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.(in thousands):


         Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

         2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

        Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

         $51,290 $49,252 $45,862  $57,815 $51,290 $49,252 

        Transfers from the non-controlling interest

                

        Increase in paid-in capital for limited partners conversion

         396     396  

        Decrease in paid-in capital for limited partners conversion

         (1,246)     (1,246)  
                      

        Change from net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. and transfers from non-controlling interest

         $50,440 $49,252 $45,862  $57,815 $50,440 $49,252 
                      
               

                Distributions.    We declared and paid the following cash dividends (in thousands):

         
         Year Ended
        December 31, 2012
         Year ended
        December 31, 2011
         
         
         Declared Paid Declared Paid 

        Preferred Stock

                     

        Series C

         $3,273 $3,273 $3,272 $3,272 

        Series F(1)

              2,240  4,008 
                  

        Total Preferred

          3,273  3,273  5,512  7,280 

        Common Stock(2)

          54,512  54,512  49,292  49,292 
                  

        Total

         $57,785 $57,785 $54,804 $56,572 
                  
         
         Year Ended
        December 31, 2013
         Year ended
        December 31, 2012
         
         
         Declared Paid Declared Paid 

        Preferred Stock Series C

         $3,273 $3,273 $3,273 $3,273 

        Common Stock

          63,631(1) 63,631(1) 54,512(2) 54,512(2)
                  

        Total

         $66,904 $66,904 $57,785 $57,785 
                  
                  

        (1)
        During 2011, we redeemed all of our Series F preferred stock.Represents $0.155 per share per month for January through September 2013 and $0.17 per share per month for October through December 2013
        (2)
        Represents $0.145 per share per month for January through July of 2012 and $0.155 per share per month for August through December of 2012. Represents $0.14 per share per month for the 2011.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                In January 2013,2014, we declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.155$0.17 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 20132014 payable on January 31, February 28 and March 28, 2013,31, 2014, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23, February 20 and March 20, 2013,21, 2014, respectively.

                Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.    During the years we had investments in Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (or REMIC) Certificates, we retained the non-investment grade certificates issued in the securitizations. During 2005, a loan was paid off in the last remaining REMIC pool which caused the last third party REMIC Certificate holders entitled to any principal payments to be paid off in full. After this transaction, we became the sole holder of the remaining REMIC Certificates and are therefore entitled to the entire principal outstanding of the loan pool underlying the remaining REMIC Certificates. Under the FASB accounting guidance relating to accounting for changes that result in a transferor regaining control of financial assets sold, a Special Purpose Entity (or SPE) may become non-qualified or tainted which generally results in the "repurchase" by the transferor of all the assets sold to and still held by the SPE. Since we were the sole REMIC Certificate holder entitled to principal from the underlying loan pool, we had all the risks and were entitled to all the rewards from the underlying loan pool. As required by the accounting guidance, the repurchase for



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        the transferred assets was accounted for at fair value. The accumulated other comprehensive income balance represents the fair market value adjustment offset by any previously adjusted impairment charge which is amortized to increase interest income over the remaining life of the loans that we repurchased from the REMIC pool. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, Other Equityother equity consisted of $152,000$117,000 and $199,000,$152,000, respectively, of accumulated other comprehensive income.

                Stock Based Compensation Plans.    During 2008 we adopted and our shareholders approved the 2008 Equity Participation Plan under which 600,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for awards, including nonqualified stock option grants and restricted stock grants to officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The terms of the awards granted under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan are set by our compensation committee at its discretion.

                Restricted Stock.    During 2013 and 2012, we granted 34,400 and 90,500 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, as follows:

         No. of Shares Price per
        Share
         Vesting Period
          14,000 $31.77 ratably over 5 years
          12,200 $31.77 January 10, 2016
          30,000 $31.77 June 15, 2015
          8,000 $31.87 ratably over 3 years
          6,300 $34.90 ratably over 5 years
          20,000 $34.90 December 20, 2015
        Year
         No. of Shares Price per
        Share
         Vesting Period

        2013:

                

          8,400 $46.54 ratably over 3 years

          6,000 $41.83 ratably over 3 years

          20,000 $36.26 June 1, 2016
                

          34,400     
                
                

        2012:

                

          14,000 $31.77 ratably over 5 years

          12,200 $31.77 January 10, 2016

          30,000 $31.77 June 15, 2015

          8,000 $31.87 ratably over 3 years

          6,300 $34.90 ratably over 5 years

          20,000 $34.90 December 20, 2015
                

          90,500     
                
                


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                Also during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the vesting of 18,180 shares of restricted common stock were accelerated due to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning. In January 2013,February 2014, we granted 20,00059,000 shares of restricted common stock at $36.26 per share. These shares all vest on June 1, 2016.

                During 2011, we granted 6,000 shares of restricted common stock at $28.70$36.81 per share. These shares vest ratably over a three-year period from the grant date.

        Dividends are payable on the restricted shares to the extent and on the same date as dividends are paid on all of our common stock. Restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 was as follows:


         2012 2011  2013 2012 

        Outstanding, January 1

         165,134 217,317  195,449 165,134 

        Granted

         90,500 6,000  34,400 90,500 

        Vested

         (60,185) (58,183) (64,700) (60,185)

        Canceled

              
                  

        Outstanding, December 31

         195,449 165,134  165,149 195,449 
             
                  

        Compensation expense for the year(1)

         $1,809,000 $1,450,000  $2,591,000 $1,809,000 
                  
             

        (1)
        During 2013, we recorded $457,000 of compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of 18,180 shares of restricted common stock due to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning. At December 31, 2012,2013, the total compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock granted is $5,041,000,$3,818,000, which will be recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period.

                Stock Options.    No stock options were issued during 2013 and 2012. Nonqualified stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:

         
         Shares Weighted Average
        Price
         
         
         2013 2012 2013 2012 

        Outstanding, January 1

          95,334  180,334 $23.93 $23.33 

        Granted

             $ $ 

        Exercised

          (22,000) (85,000)$23.79 $22.66 

        Canceled

             $ $ 
                    

        Outstanding, December 31

          73,334  95,334 $23.97 $23.93 
                    
                    

        Exercisable, December 31(1)

          73,334  95,334 $23.97 $23.93 
                    
                    

        (1)
        The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2013, based upon the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2013 the last trading day of 2013, amounted to approximately $838,000. Options exercisable at December 31, 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 3 years.

                The options exercised during 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

         
         Options
        Exercised
         Weighted
        Average
        Exercise
        Price
         Option
        Value
         Market
        Value(1)
         

        2013

          22,000 $23.79 $523,000 $865,000 

        2012

          85,000 $22.66 $1,926,000 $2,761,000 

        (1)
        As of the exercise dates.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                Stock Options.    No stock options were issued during 2012 and 2011. Nonqualified stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was as follows:

         
         Shares Weighted Average
        Price
         
         
         2012 2011 2012 2011 

        Outstanding, January 1

          180,334  185,334 $23.33 $23.34 

        Granted

             $ $ 

        Exercised

          (85,000) (5,000)$22.66 $23.79 

        Canceled

             $ $ 
                    

        Outstanding, December 31

          95,334  180,334 $23.93 $23.33 
                    

        Exercisable, December 31(1)

          95,334  175,334 $23.93 $23.29 
                    

        (1)
        The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2012, based upon the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2012, amounted to approximately $1,074,000. Options exercisable at December 31, 2012 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 3.9 years.

                The options exercised during 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

         
         Options
        Exercised
         Weighted
        Average
        Exercise
        Price
         Option
        Value
         Market
        Value(1)
         

        2012

          85,000 $22.66 $1,926,000 $2,761,000 

        2011

          5,000 $23.79 $119,000 $152,000 

        (1)
        As of the exercise dates.

                We use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees. This model requires management to make certain estimates including stock volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected term. If management incorrectly estimates these variables, the results of operations could be affected.

                The weighted average exercise share price of the options was $23.93$23.97 and $23.33$23.93 as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. At December 31, 2012,2013, all stock options are exercisable and no shares are scheduled to vest beyond December 31, 2012.2013.

        11.   Commitments and Contingencies

                During 2011, we purchased four skilled nursing properties with 524-beds in Texas as described inNote 6. Real Estate Investments.        As part of the purchase agreement,an acquisition in 2011, we paid cash at closing and committed to provide a contingent earn-out paymentspayment if certain operational thresholds arewere met. The contingent earn-out payment arrangements require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $11,000,000 upon the properties achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. Wewas recorded the contingent earn-out payments at fair value, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, and are accretingwe accreted the earn-outcontingent liability to the estimated settlement amount as of the payment date. ThisThe fair value measurementof such contingent liability was re-evaluated on a quarterly basis based on significant input not observablechanges in theestimates of future operating results and changes in market and thus represented a Level 3 measurement.discount rates. During 2011,2013, we paid $4,000,000$7,000,000 related to the first contingent earn-out payment.liability. Accordingly, we have no remaining contingent liability as of December 31, 2013. During 20122013 and 2011,2012, we recorded non-cash interest expense of $256,000 and $439,000, and



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        $464,000, respectively, related to the earn-outcontingent liability. At December 31, 2012, and 2011, the earn-outcontingent liability had a carrying value of $6,744,000 and $6,305,000, respectively.$6,744,000.

                At December 31, 2012,2013, we committed to provide $76,921,000had outstanding commitments totaling $80,306,000 to develop, re-develop, renovate or expand senior housing and expand five skilled nursing properties withlong term care properties. As of December 31, 2013, we have funded $23,418,000 under these commitments and we have a totalremaining commitment of 619 beds,$56,888,000. In January 2014, we funded $8,828,000 under investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a memory care property with 60 units, an independent living property with 140 units and four assisted living and memory care combination properties with a totalremaining commitment of 258 units.$48,060,000. We also have a commitment to fundprovide, under certain conditions, up to $5,000,000 per year through December 2014 to an existing operator for the lifeexpansion of the 37 properties they lease which has a maturity date of December 2014.from us. SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of these commitments.

                Additionally at December 31, 2012,2013, we had a $10,600,000 mortgage and construction commitment. As of December 31, 2012,2013, we funded $2,619,000$7,590,000 under this commitment and we have a remaining commitment of $7,981,000.$3,010,000. In 2013, we funded a $124,387,000 mortgage loan and committed to provide an additional $12,000,000 for capital improvements and, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, additional loan proceeds of up to $40,000,000. As of December 31, 2013, there has been no funding under either of these commitments. SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of thisthese mortgage and construction loan. We alsoloans.

                At December 31, 2013, we committed to provide $1,400,000$2,425,000 in loanloans and line of credit agreements to certain operators.agreements. As of December 31, 2012,2013, we had funded $20,000$595,000 under these commitments and we have a remaining commitment of $1,380,000.$1,830,000. SeeNote 7. Notes Receivables for further discussion of these commitments.

        12.   Transactions with Related Party

                We have directly entered into one transaction with Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (or SHG). One of our directors, Boyd W. Hendrickson, servesserved as Chief Executive Officer of SHG.SHG until his retirement on November 20, 2013.

                In December 2005, we purchased, on the open market, $10,000,000 face value of SHG Senior Subordinated Notes with a face rate of 11.0% and an effective yield of 11.1%. Our Board of Directors, with Mr. Hendrickson abstaining, ratified the purchase of SHG Senior Subordinated Notes. As a result



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        of an early redemption by SHG in 2007, we had a remaining investment in $6,500,000 face value of SHG Senior Subordinated Notes at December 31, 2011. During 2012, SHG redeemed all of their outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes at par value plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the redemption date. During 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, we recognized $235,000 $721,000 and $720,000$721,000 of interest income related to the SHG Senior Subordinated Notes.

                In addition, during September 2007 SHG purchased the assets of Laurel Healthcare (or Laurel). We were not a direct party to this transaction. One of the assets SHG purchased was Laurel's leasehold interests in the skilled nursing properties in New Mexico Laurel leased from us under a 15-year master lease agreement dated in February 2006. Our Board of Directors, with Mr. Hendrickson abstaining, ratified our consent to the assignment of Laurel's master lease to subsidiaries of SHG. The economic terms of the master lease agreement did not change as a result of our assignment of the master lease to subsidiaries of SHG. During 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, we received $4,479,000, $4,370,000 $4,264,000 and $4,160,000,$4,264,000, respectively, in rental income and recorded $22,000, $131,000 $238,000 and $342,000,$238,000, respectively, in straight-line rental income from subsidiaries of SHG. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the straight-line rent receivable from subsidiaries of SHG was $3,213,000 and $3,191,000, and $3,060,000, respectively.



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        13.   Distributions

                We must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income in order to continue to qualify as a REIT. This distribution requirement can be satisfied by current year distributions or, to a certain extent, by distributions in the following year.

                For federal tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are treated as ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination thereof. Distributions for 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 were cash distributions. The federal income tax classification of the per share common stock distributions are as follows (unaudited):


         Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 

         2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

        Ordinary taxable distribution

         $1.539 $1.370 $1.200  $1.534 $1.539 $1.370 

        Return of capital

         0.242 0.295 0.334  0.313 0.242 0.295 

        Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

         0.004  0.034  0.058 0.004  

        Long term capital gain

         0.005 0.015 0.012   0.005 0.015 
                      

        Total

         $1.790 $1.680 $1.580  $1.905 $1.790 $1.680 
                      
               


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        14. Net Income Per Common Share

                Basic and diluted net income per share was as follows(in thousands except per share amounts):


         For the year ended December 31,  For the year ended December 31, 

         2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

        Income from continuing operations

         $51,311 $49,542 $45,595  $55,405 $50,306 $48,620 

        Less net income allocated to non-controlling interests

         (37) (191) (191)  (37) (191)

        Less net income allocated to participating securities:

                

        Non-forfeitable dividends on participating securities

         (377) (342) (230) (381) (377) (342)

        Income allocated to participating securities

         (2)   
                      

        Total net income allocated to participating securities

         (377) (342) (230) (383) (377) (342)

        Less net income allocated to preferred stockholders:

                

        Preferred stock dividends

         (3,273) (5,512) (13,662) (3,273) (3,273) (5,512)

        Preferred stock redemption charge

          (3,566) (2,383)   (3,566)
                      

        Total net income allocated to preferred stockholders

         (3,273) (9,078) (16,045) (3,273) (3,273) (9,078)
                      

        Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders

         47,624 39,931 29,129  51,749 46,619 39,009 

        Discontinued operations:

                

        (Loss) gain from discontinued operations

          (99) 148 

        Income from discontinued operations

         805 1,005 823 

        Gain on sale of assets, net

         16  310  1,605 16  
                      

        Total net income (loss) from discontinued operations

         16 (99) 458 

        Total net income from discontinued operations

         2,410 1,021 823 
                      

        Net income available to common stockholders

         47,640 39,832 29,587  54,159 47,640 39,832 

        Effect of dilutive securities:

                

        Convertible preferred securities

           40     
                      

        Total effect of dilutive securities

           40     
                      

        Net income for diluted net income per share

         $47,640 $39,832 $29,627  $54,159 $47,640 $39,832 
               
                      

        Shares for basic net income per share

         30,238 29,194 24,495  33,111 30,238 29,194 

        Effect of dilutive securities:

                

        Stock options

         40 28 23  31 40 28 

        Convertible preferred securities

           50     
                      

        Total effect of dilutive securities

         40 28 73  31 40 28 
                      

        Shares for diluted net income per share

         30,278 29,222 24,568  33,142 30,278 29,222 
               
                      

        Basic net income per share

         $1.58 $1.36 $1.21  $1.64 $1.58 $1.36 
                      
               

        Diluted net income per share(1)

         $1.57 $1.36 $1.21  $1.63 $1.57 $1.36 
                      
               

        (1)
        For each year, the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, the participating securities and the convertible non-controlling interests have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as such inclusion would be anti-dilutive.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        15. Quarterly Financial Information


         For the quarter ended  For the quarter ended 

         March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,  March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, 

         (unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
          (unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
         

        2013

                 

        Revenues

         $25,277 $25,279 $25,825 $28,593 

        Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

         254 (701) 2,857  

        Net income available to common stockholders

         12,060 11,994 16,373 13,732 

        Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

                 

        Basic

         $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.40 

        Diluted

         $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.40 

        Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued operations:

                 

        Basic

         $0.01 $(0.02)$0.08 $0.00 

        Diluted

         $0.01 $(0.02)$0.08 $0.00 

        Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

                 

        Basic

         $0.40 $0.36 $0.47 $0.40 

        Diluted

         $0.40 $0.36 $0.47 $0.40 

        Dividends per share declared

         $0.465 $0.465 $0.465 $0.510 

        Dividend per share paid

         $0.465 $0.465 $0.465 $0.510 

        2012

          
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Revenues

         $22,641 $23,091 $23,789 $24,512  $22,251 $22,704 $23,402 $24,125 

        Net income from discontinued operations

         16     263 251 253 254 

        Net income available to common stockholders

         12,009 12,194 11,583 11,854  12,009 12,194 11,583 11,854 

        Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

                  

        Basic

        ��$0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39  $0.39 $0.40 $0.37 $0.38 

        Diluted

         $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39  $0.39 $0.39 $0.37 $0.38 

        Net loss per common share from discontinued operations:

         

        Net income per common share from discontinued operations:

                 

        Basic

         $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00  $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 

        Diluted

         $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00  $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 

        Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

                  

        Basic

         $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39  $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39 

        Diluted

         $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39  $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39 

        Dividends per share declared

         $0.435 $0.435 $0.455 $0.465  $0.435 $0.435 $0.455 $0.465 

        Dividend per share paid

         $0.435 $0.435 $0.455 $0.465  $0.435 $0.435 $0.455 $0.465 

        2011

         

        Revenues

         $20,254 $21,181 $21,431 $22,299 

        Net loss income from discontinued operations

         (25) (25) (25) (24)

        Net income available to common stockholders

         5,393 11,311 11,472 11,656 

        Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

         

        Basic

         $0.21 $0.38 $0.38 $0.39 

        Diluted

         $0.21 $0.38 $0.38 $0.39 

        Net loss per common share from discontinued operations:

         

        Basic

         $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 

        Diluted

         $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 

        Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

         

        Basic

         $0.20 $0.38 $0.38 $0.39 

        Diluted

         $0.20 $0.37 $0.38 $0.39 

        Dividends per share declared

         $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 

        Dividend per share paid

         $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 

        NOTE:
        Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year. Computations of per share amounts from continuing operations, discontinued operations and net income (loss) are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not agree with the per share amounts from net income (loss) available to common stockholders.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        16. Fair Value Measurements

                In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. We havedid not electedadopt the elective fair market value option for any of our financial assets orand financial liabilities.

                The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. We do not invest our cash in auction rate securities. The carrying value and fair value of our financial instruments as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 assuming election of the fair market value optionfor our financial assets and financial liabilities were as follows (in thousands):


         At December 31, 2012 At December 31, 2011  At December 31, 2013 At December 31, 2012 

         Carrying
        Value
         Fair Value Carrying
        Value
         Fair Value  Carrying
        Value
         Fair Value Carrying
        Value
         Fair Value 

        Mortgage loans receivable

         $39,299 $44,939(1)$53,081 $61,844(1) $165,444 $200,248(1)$39,299 $44,939(1)

        Marketable debt securities

           6,485 6,500(2)

        Bonds payable

         2,635 2,635(3) 3,200 3,200(3) 2,035 2,035(2) 2,635 2,635(2)

        Bank borrowings

         115,500 115,500(3) 56,000 56,000(3) 21,000 21,000(2) 115,500 115,500(2)

        Senior unsecured notes

         185,800 194,838(4) 100,000 101,223(4) 255,800 262,351(3) 185,800 194,838(3)

        Earn-out liabilities

         6,744 6,744(5) 6,305 6,305(5)

        Contingent liabilities

           6,744 6,744(4)

        (1)
        Our investment in mortgage loans receivable is classified as Level 3. The fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is determined using our assumption on market conditions adjusted for market and credit risk and current returns on our investments. The discount rate used to value our future cash inflows of the mortgage loans receivable at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 8.4% and 2011 was 6.0%., respectively.
        (2)
        Our investment in marketable debt securities is classified as Level 2. The fair value is measured using quoted market rates based on most recent transactions from an independent third party source. The pricing of our marketable debt securities as of December 31, 2011 was 100.0%. During 2012, these marketable debt securities were redeemed at par value. SeeNote 4. Marketable Securities for further discussion.
        (3)
        Our bonds payable and bank borrowings are at a variable interest rate. The estimated fair value of our bonds payable and bank borrowings approximated their carrying values at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 based upon prevailing market interest rates for similar debt arrangements.
        (4)(3)
        Our obligation under our senior unsecured notes is classified as Level 3 and thus the fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is measured based upon management's estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us, and instruments of comparable maturities. At December 31, 2013, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 3.95% for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.25% for those maturing beyond year 2020. At December 31, 2012, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 3.8% for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.3% for those maturing beyond year 2020. At December 31, 2011, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 4.8%.
        (5)(4)
        Our contingent obligation under the earn-out liabilities is classified as Level 3. We estimated the fair value of the contingent earn-out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk-free U.S. Treasury rate plus a company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants. At December 31, 2012, and 2011, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of the earn-out liability was 6.6% and 6.8%, respectively..

        17. Subsequent Events

                We had the following events occur subsequent to the balance sheet date.

                Real Estate—Owned Properties:    We granted 20,000 sharesfunded $8,828,000 under ongoing real estate investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of restricted common stock at $36.26 per share. These shares all vest$48,060,000. SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion on June 1, 2016. Additionally, we declaredthe commitments.

                Major Operator:    We will not be renewing the leases expiring on December 31, 2014 with Extendicare and ALC. We have begun a monthly cash dividend of $0.155 per share on our common stockformal process to re-lease the 37 assisted living properties they lease from us. SeeNote 3. Major Operator for the months of January, February and March 2013. The monthly cash dividends are payable on January 31, February 28 and March 28, 2013, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23, February 20 and March 20, 2013, respectively.further discussion.



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

                During January 2013, we borrowed $2,000,000 at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%. After this borrowing, we had $117,500,000 outstanding and $122,500,000 available for borrowing.

                Debt:    In January and February2014, we borrowed $11,500,000 under our unsecured revolving line of 2013, we funded $776,000 and $128,000, respectively, under a $10,600,000 mortgage and construction loan andcredit. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $7,077,000. We also funded $2,484,000 and $488,000 in January and February of 2013, respectively, under investment commitments. See$207,500,000 available for borrowing.

        Note 6. Real Estate Investments        Equity:    We declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.17 per share on our common stock for further discussion.the months of January, February and March 2014, payable on January 31, February 28, and March 31, 2014, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23, February 20, and March 21, 2014, respectively. Additionally, we granted 59,000 shares of restricted common stock at $36.81 per share. These shares vest ratably over a three-year period from the grant date.



        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE II

        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

        (in thousands)


          
         Additions  
          
           
         Additions  
          
         
        Account Description
         Balance at
        beginning of
        period(2)
         (Recovered)
        charged to
        costs and
        expenses
         Charged to
        other accounts
         Deductions(1) Balance at end
        of period(2)
          Balance at
        beginning of
        period(2)
         (Recovered)
        charged to
        costs and
        expenses
         Charged to
        other accounts
         Deductions(1) Balance at end
        of period(2)
         

        Year ended December 31, 2010

         

        Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables

         $704 $1,166 $ $(889)$981 

        Straight-line rent receivable allowance

         629 844   1,473 
                   

         $1,333 $2,010 $ $(889)$2,454 
                   

        Year ended December 31, 2011

                    

        Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables

         $981 $(60)$ $ $921  $981 $(60)$ $ $921 

        Straight-line rent receivable allowance

         1,473 46   1,519  1,473 46   1,519 
                              

         $2,454 $(14)$ $ $2,440  $2,454 $(14)$ $ $2,440 
                   
                              

        Year ended December 31, 2012

          
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables

         $921 $(139)$ $ $782  $921 $(139)$ $ $782 

        Straight-line rent receivable allowance

         1,519 38   1,557  1,519 38   1,557 
                              

         $2,440 $(101)$ $ $2,339  $2,440 $(101)$ $ $2,339 
                              
                   

        Year ended December 31, 2013

         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables

         $782 $1,274 $ $(385)$1,671 

        Straight-line rent receivable allowance

         1,557 906(3)  (922)(3) 1,541 
                   

         $2,339 $2,180 $ $(1,307)$3,212 
                   
                   

        (1)
        Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off.
        (2)
        Includes straight-line rent receivable allowance for properties classified as held-for-sale.
        (3)
        Includes the write-off of an $878 straight-line rent receivable balance related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE III

        REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

        (in thousands)


          
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2012
          
          
          
           
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2013
          
          
          
         

          
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
           
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
         

         Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
          Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
         

        Skilled Nursing Properties:

        Skilled Nursing Properties:

         

        Skilled Nursing Properties:

                           

        134 Alamogordo, NM

          210 2,593 319 210 2,912 3,122 751 1985 2001  $ $210 $2,593 $371 $210 $2,964 $3,174 $814 1985 2001 

        218 Albuquerque, NM

          1,696 3,891 530 1,696 4,421 6,117 1,162 2008 2005   1,696 3,891 530 1,696 4,421 6,117 1,277 2008 2005 

        219 Albuquerque, NM

          1,950 8,910 207 1,950 9,117 11,067 2,407 1982 2005   1,950 8,910 207 1,950 9,117 11,067 2,617 1982 2005 

        220 Albuquerque, NM

          2,463 7,647 9 2,463 7,656 10,119 2,028 1970 2005   2,463 7,647 9 2,463 7,656 10,119 2,201 1970 2005 

        042 Altoona, IA

          105 2,309 444 105 2,753 2,858 1,503 1973 1996   105 2,309 444 105 2,753 2,858 1,580 1973 1996 

        252 Amarillo, TX

          844  7,925 844 7,925 8,769 186 2013 2011 

        214 Aransas Pass, TX

          154 1,276 589 154 1,865 2,019 523 2008 2004   154 1,276 589 154 1,865 2,019 601 2008 2004 

        247 Arlington, TX

          1,016 13,649  1,016 13,649 14,665 917 2007 2011   1,016 13,649  1,016 13,649 14,665 1,427 2007 2011 

        171 Atlanta, GA

          175 1,282 3 175 1,285 1,460 617 1968 1999   175 1,282 3 175 1,285 1,460 648 1968 1999 

        040 Atmore, AL

          131 2,877 196 131 3,073 3,204 1,510 1974 1996   131 2,877 196 131 3,073 3,204 1,594 1974 1996 

        221 Beaumont, TX

          370 1,141 93 370 1,234 1,604 384 1950 2005   370 1,141 93 370 1,234 1,604 410 1950 2005 

        213 Beeville, TX

          186 1,197 70 186 1,267 1,453 303 1974 2004   186 1,197 70 186 1,267 1,453 340 1974 2004 

        215 Benbrook, TX

          480 2,121 102 480 2,223 2,703 651 1976 2005   480 2,121 102 480 2,223 2,703 700 1976 2005 

        007 Bradenton, FL

          330 2,720 160 330 2,880 3,210 1,723 2002 1993 

        256 Brownwood, TX

          164 6,336  164 6,336 6,500 104 2011 2012   164 6,336  164 6,336 6,500 312 2011 2012 

        189 Canyon, TX

         (2) 196 507 211 196 718 914 717 1986 2000  (2) 196 507 211 196 718 914 718 1986 2000 

        043 Carroll, IA

          47 1,033 213 47 1,246 1,293 679 1969 1996   47 1,033 213 47 1,246 1,293 714 1969 1996 

        177 Chesapeake, VA

          388 3,469 1,097 388 4,566 4,954 2,484 2007 1995   388 3,469 1,097 388 4,566 4,954 2,638 2007 1995 

        257 Cincinnati, OH

          1,890 25,110  1,890 25,110 27,000 240 2009 2012   1,890 25,110  1,890 25,110 27,000 816 2009 2012 

        125 Clovis, NM

          561 5,539 307 561 5,846 6,407 1,738 2006 2001   561 5,539 307 561 5,846 6,407 1,880 2006 2001 

        129 Clovis, NM

          598 5,902 59 598 5,961 6,559 1,801 1995 2001   598 5,902 59 598 5,961 6,559 1,945 1995 2001 

        253 Colton, CA

          2,342 15,158  2,342 15,158 17,500 501 1990 2011   2,342 15,158  2,342 15,158 17,500 931 1990 2011 

        211 Commerce City, CO

          236 3,217 167 236 3,384 3,620 1,049 1964 2004   236 3,217 167 236 3,384 3,620 1,137 1964 2004 

        212 Commerce City, CO

          161 2,160 95 161 2,255 2,416 680 1967 2004   161 2,160 95 161 2,255 2,416 736 1967 2004 

        246 Crowley, TX

          2,247 14,276  2,247 14,276 16,523 860 2007 2011   2,247 14,276  2,247 14,276 16,523 1,380 2007 2011 

        235 Daleville, VA

          279 8,382  279 8,382 8,661 783 2005 2010   279 8,382  279 8,382 8,661 1,086 2005 2010 

        258 Dayton, OH

          373 26,627  373 26,627 27,000 256 2010 2012   373 26,627  373 26,627 27,000 871 2010 2012 

        217 Del Norte, CO

          103 930 336 103 1,266 1,369 337 2006 2005 

        196 Dresden, TN

          31 1,529 123 31 1,652 1,683 618 2002 2000   31 1,529 875 31 2,404 2,435 655 2002 2000 

        185 Gardner, KS

          896 4,478 4,150 896 8,628 9,524 2,435 2011 1999   896 4,478 4,150 896 8,628 9,524 2,676 2011 1999 

        248 Granbury, TX

          836 6,693  836 6,693 7,529 680 2008 2011   836 6,693  836 6,693 7,529 1,001 2008 2011 

        044 Granger, IA

          62 1,356 221 62 1,577 1,639 815 1979 1996   62 1,356 221 62 1,577 1,639 862 1979 1996 

        205 Grapevine, TX

          431 1,449 188 431 1,637 2,068 716 1974 2002   431 1,449 188 431 1,637 2,068 752 1974 2002 

        172 Griffin, GA

          500 2,900  500 2,900 3,400 1,258 1969 1999   500 2,900  500 2,900 3,400 1,333 1969 1999 

        250 Hewitt, TX

          1,780 8,220 99 1,780 8,319 10,099 341 2008 2011   1,780 8,220 99 1,780 8,319 10,099 587 2008 2011 

        054 Houston, TX

          202 4,458 1,426 202 5,884 6,086 3,041 2007 1996   202 4,458 1,426 202 5,884 6,086 3,218 2007 1996 

        051 Houston, TX

          365 3,769 1,598 365 5,367 5,732 2,737 1968 1996   365 3,769 1,598 365 5,367 5,732 2,874 1968 1996 

        055 Houston, TX

          202 4,458 1,359 202 5,817 6,019 2,945 2008 1996   202 4,458 1,359 202 5,817 6,019 3,118 2008 1996 

        208 Jacksonville, FL

          486 1,981 30 486 2,011 2,497 720 1987 2002   486 1,981 30 486 2,011 2,497 764 1987 2002 

        045 Jefferson, IA

          86 1,883 296 86 2,179 2,265 1,105 1972 1996   86 1,883 296 86 2,179 2,265 1,169 1972 1996 

        216 Marion, OH

          119 1,156 1,142 119 2,298 2,417 639 2007 2005 

        222 Marion, OH

          48 2,466  48 2,466 2,514 597 1997 2006 

        227 Marion, OH

          210 804  210 804 1,014 804 1959 2008 

        008 Lecanto, FL

          351 2,665 2,737 351 5,402 5,753 3,040 2006 1993 

        053 Mesa, AZ

          305 6,909 1,876 305 8,785 9,090 4,164 1996 1996   305 6,909 1,876 305 8,785 9,090 4,408 1996 1996 

        226 Mesa, AZ

          1,095 2,330  1,095 2,330 3,425 564 1979 2006   1,095 2,330  1,095 2,330 3,425 637 1979 2006 

        050 Midland, TX

          33 2,285 26 33 2,311 2,344 1,195 1973 1996   33 2,285 26 33 2,311 2,344 1,256 1973 1996 

        242 Mission, TX

          1,111 16,602  1,111 16,602 17,713 973 2004 2010   1,111 16,602  1,111 16,602 17,713 1,497 2004 2010 

        041 Montgomery, AL

          242 5,327 115 242 5,442 5,684 2,740 1974 1996   242 5,327 115 242 5,442 5,684 2,888 1974 1996 

        115 Nacogdoches, TX

          100 1,738 168 100 1,906 2,006 911 1973 1997   100 1,738 168 100 1,906 2,006 960 1973 1997 

        233 Nacogdoches, TX

          394 7,456 168 394 7,624 8,018 705 1991 2010   394 7,456 268 394 7,724 8,118 950 1991 2010 

        249 Nacogdoches, TX

          1,015 11,109  1,015 11,109 12,124 848 2007 2011   1,015 11,109  1,015 11,109 12,124 1,307 2007 2011 

        046 Norwalk, IA

          47 1,033 239 47 1,272 1,319 669 1975 1996   47 1,033 239 47 1,272 1,319 710 1975 1996 

        176 Olathe, KS

          520 1,872 313 520 2,185 2,705 1,014 1968 1999   520 1,872 313 520 2,185 2,705 1,089 1968 1999 

        224 Orrville, OH

          107 1,946 108 107 2,054 2,161 551 1956 2006 

        251 Pasadena, TX

          1,155 14,345  1,155 14,345 15,500 477 2005 2011   1,155 14,345  1,155 14,345 15,500 861 2005 2011 

        210 Phoenix, AZ

          334 3,383 456 334 3,839 4,173 1,328 1982 2004   334 3,383 456 334 3,839 4,173 1,431 1982 2004 

        193 Phoenix, AZ

          300 9,703 92 300 9,795 10,095 4,090 1985 2000   300 9,703 92 300 9,795 10,095 4,342 1985 2000 

        047 Polk City, IA

          63 1,376 153 63 1,529 1,592 802 1976 1996   63 1,376 153 63 1,529 1,592 845 1976 1996 

        094 Portland, OR

          100 1,925 2,652 100 4,577 4,677 1,919 2007 1997   100 1,925 2,652 100 4,577 4,677 2,134 2007 1997 

        254 Red Oak, TX

          1,427 17,173  1,427 17,173 18,600 387 2002 2012   1,427 17,173  1,427 17,173 18,600 902 2002 2012 

        124 Richland Hills, TX

          144 1,656 427 144 2,083 2,227 931 1976 2001 

        197 Ripley, TN

          20 985 641 20 1,626 1,646 554 2007 2000 


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE III

        REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

        (in thousands)


          
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2012
          
          
          
           
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2013
          
          
          
         

          
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
           
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
         

         Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
          Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
         

        124 Richland Hills, TX

          144 1,656 427 144 2,083 2,227 876 1976 2001 

        197 Ripley, TN

          20 985 387 20 1,372 1,392 517 2007 2000 

        133 Roswell, NM

          568 5,235 449 568 5,684 6,252 1,516 1975 2001   568 5,235 1,056 568 6,291 6,859 1,644 1975 2001 

        081 Sacramento, CA

          220 2,929  220 2,929�� 3,149 1,464 1968 1997   220 2,929  220 2,929 3,149 1,541 1968 1997 

        085 Salina, KS

         (2) 100 1,153 628 100 1,781 1,881 934 1985 1997  (2) 100 1,153 628 100 1,781 1,881 981 1985 1997 

        243 Stephenville TX

          670 10,117  670 10,117 10,787 855 2009 2010   670 10,117  670 10,117 10,787 1,142 2009 2010 

        234 St. Petersburg, FL

          1,070 7,930  1,070 7,930 9,000 682 1988 2010   1,070 7,930  1,070 7,930 9,000 923 1988 2010 

        225 Tacoma, WA

          723 6,401 901 723 7,302 8,025 1,750 2009 2006   723 6,401 901 723 7,302 8,025 2,037 2009 2006 

        178 Tappahannock, VA

         (2) 375 1,327 397 375 1,724 2,099 1,303 1978 1995  (2) 375 1,327 397 375 1,724 2,099 1,342 1978 1995 

        270 Trinity, FL

          1,653 12,748  1,653 12,748 14,401 69 N/A 2013 

        192 Tucson, AZ

          276 8,924 112 276 9,036 9,312 3,768 1992 2000   276 8,924 112 276 9,036 9,312 4,000 1992 2000 

        209 Tyler, TX

          300 3,071 22 300 3,093 3,393 813 1974 2004   300 3,071 22 300 3,093 3,393 887 1974 2004 

        223 Wooster, OH

          118 1,711 2,223 118 3,934 4,052 1,171 2008 2006 
                                                

        Skilled Nursing Properties

          37,707 373,090 27,591 37,707 400,681 438,388 83,422       40,180 382,210 36,369 40,180 418,579 458,759 95,599     
                                                

        Assisted Living Properties:

        Assisted Living Properties:

         

        Assisted Living Properties:

                           

        077 Ada, OK

          100 1,650  100 1,650 1,750 684 1996 1996   100 1,650  100 1,650 1,750 725 1996 1996 

        136 Arlington, OH

          629 6,973  629 6,973 7,602 2,011 1993 2001   629 6,973  629 6,973 7,602 2,182 1993 2001 

        105 Arvada, CO

          100 2,810 276 100 3,086 3,186 1,206 1997 1997   100 2,810 280 100 3,090 3,190 1,282 1997 1997 

        063 Athens, TX

          96 1,510 1 96 1,511 1,607 662 1995 1996   96 1,510 1 96 1,511 1,607 699 1995 1996 

        260 Aurora, CO

          831 10,071  831 10,071 10,902  1999 2012   831 10,071  831 10,071 10,902 303 1999 2012 

        203 Bakersfield, CA

          834 11,986 812 834 12,798 13,632 3,968 2002 2001   834 11,986 812 834 12,798 13,632 4,367 2002 2001 

        072 Battleground, WA

          100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 1,030 1996 1996   100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 1,091 1996 1996 

        117 Beatrice, NE

          100 2,173  100 2,173 2,273 854 1997 1997   100 2,173  100 2,173 2,273 907 1997 1997 

        137 Bexley, OH

          306 4,196  306 4,196 4,502 1,211 1992 2001   306 4,196  306 4,196 4,502 1,314 1992 2001 

        106 Bullhead City, AZ

          100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 983 1997 1997   100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 1,045 1997 1997 

        111 Burley, ID

          100 2,200  100 2,200 2,300 868 1997 1997   100 2,200  100 2,200 2,300 922 1997 1997 

        112 Caldwell, ID

          100 2,200  100 2,200 2,300 868 1997 1997   100 2,200  100 2,200 2,300 922 1997 1997 

        024 Camas, WA

         (3) 100 2,175  100 2,175 2,275 926 1996 1996  (3) 100 2,175  100 2,175 2,275 979 1996 1996 

        160 Central, SC

          100 2,321  100 2,321 2,421 746 1998 1999   100 2,321  100 2,321 2,421 797 1998 1999 

        263 Chatham, NJ

          5,365 36,399  5,365 36,399 41,764  2002 2012   5,365 36,399  5,365 36,399 41,764 1,050 2002 2012 

        191 Cordele, GA

          153 1,455 132 153 1,587 1,740 659 2002 2000   153 1,455 132 153 1,587 1,740 701 2002 2000 

        240 Daytona Beach, FL

          900 3,400  900 3,400 4,300 229 1996 2010   900 3,400  900 3,400 4,300 334 1996 2010 

        156 Denison, IA

          100 2,713  100 2,713 2,813 1,009 1998 1998   100 2,713  100 2,713 2,813 1,076 1998 1998 

        057 Dodge City, KS

          84 1,666 4 84 1,670 1,754 754 1995 1995   84 1,666 4 84 1,670 1,754 794 1995 1995 

        083 Durant, OK

          100 1,769  100 1,769 1,869 717 1997 1997   100 1,769  100 1,769 1,869 761 1997 1997 

        107 Edmond, OK

          100 1,365 526 100 1,891 1,991 746 1996 1997   100 1,365 526 100 1,891 1,991 792 1996 1997 

        122 Elkhart, IN

          100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 939 1997 1997   100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 999 1997 1997 

        155 Erie, PA

          850 7,477  850 7,477 8,327 2,837 1998 1999   850 7,477  850 7,477 8,327 3,010 1998 1999 

        113 Eugene, OR

          100 2,600  100 2,600 2,700 1,022 1997 1997   100 2,600  100 2,600 2,700 1,086 1997 1997 

        100 Fremont ,OH

          100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 964 1997 1997   100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 1,023 1997 1997 

        163 Ft. Collins, CO

          100 2,961  100 2,961 3,061 1,038 1998 1999   100 2,961 2 100 2,963 3,063 1,109 1998 1999 

        170 Ft. Collins, CO

          100 3,400  100 3,400 3,500 1,168 1999 1999   100 3,400 2 100 3,402 3,502 1,252 1999 1999 

        132 Ft. Meyers, FL

          100 2,728 9 100 2,737 2,837 1,035 1998 1998   100 2,728 9 100 2,737 2,837 1,103 1998 1998 

        230 Ft. Wayne, IN

          594 3,461 731 594 4,192 4,786 421 1996 2009   594 3,461 731 594 4,192 4,786 594 1996 2009 

        229 Ft. Worth, TX

          333 4,385 985 333 5,370 5,703 1,029 2009 2008   333 4,385 1,028 333 5,413 5,746 1,280 2009 2008 

        167 Goldsboro, NC

          100 2,385 1 100 2,386 2,486 713 1998 1999   100 2,385 1 100 2,386 2,486 762 1998 1999 

        022 Grandview, WA

         (3) 100 1,940  100 1,940 2,040 840 1996 1996  (3) 100 1,940  100 1,940 2,040 888 1996 1996 

        056 Great Bend, KS

          80 1,570 21 80 1,591 1,671 782 1995 1995   80 1,570 21 80 1,591 1,671 827 1995 1995 

        102 Greeley, CO

          100 2,310 270 100 2,580 2,680 1,014 1997 1997   100 2,310 270 100 2,580 2,680 1,078 1997 1997 

        164 Greenville, NC

          100 2,478 2 100 2,480 2,580 835 1998 1999   100 2,478 2 100 2,480 2,580 891 1998 1999 

        062 Greenville, TX

          42 1,565  42 1,565 1,607 685 1995 1996   42 1,565  42 1,565 1,607 723 1995 1996 

        161 Greenwood, SC

          100 2,638  100 2,638 2,738 907 1998 1999   100 2,638  100 2,638 2,738 968 1998 1999 

        241 Gulf Breeze, FL

          720 3,780  720 3,780 4,500 275 2000 2010   720 3,780  720 3,780 4,500 402 2000 2010 

        079 Hayden, ID

          100 2,450 243 100 2,693 2,793 1,102 1996 1996   100 2,450 243 100 2,693 2,793 1,168 1996 1996 

        097 Hoquiam, WA

          100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 989 1997 1997   100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 1,050 1997 1997 

        066 Jacksonville, TX

          100 1,900  100 1,900 2,000 826 1996 1996   100 1,900  100 1,900 2,000 872 1996 1996 

        071 Kelso, WA

          100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 1,086 1996 1996   100 2,500  100 2,500 2,600 1,147 1996 1996 

        021 Kennewick. WA

         (3) 100 1,940  100 1,940 2,040 844 1996 1996  (3) 100 1,940  100 1,940 2,040 892 1996 1996 

        073 Klamath Falls, OR

          100 2,300  100 2,300 2,400 944 1996 1996   100 2,300  100 2,300 2,400 1,001 1996 1996 

        101 Lake Havasu, AZ

          100 2,420  100 2,420 2,520 1,017 1997 1997 

        190 Lakeland, FL

          519 2,312 1,626 519 3,938 4,457 1,648 2009 2000 


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE III

        REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

        (in thousands)


          
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2012
          
          
          
           
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2013
          
          
          
         

          
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
           
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
         

         Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
          Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
         

        101 Lake Havasu, AZ

          100 2,420  100 2,420 2,520 958 1997 1997 

        190 Lakeland, FL

          519 2,312 1,626 519 3,938 4,457 1,479 2009 2000 

        255 Littleton, CO

          1,882  8,249 1,882 8,249 10,131 147 2013 2012 

        148 Longmont, CO

          100 2,640  100 2,640 2,740 988 1998 1998   100 2,640  100 2,640 2,740 1,053 1998 1998 

        060 Longview, TX

          38 1,568 1 38 1,569 1,607 693 1995 1995   38 1,568 1 38 1,569 1,607 731 1995 1995 

        114 Loveland, CO

          911 11,703  911 11,703 12,614  2000 2012 

        221 Louisville, CO

          911 11,703  911 11,703 12,614 345 2000 2012 

        114 Loveland, CO

          100 2,865 270 100 3,135 3,235 1,217 1997 1997   100 2,865 270 100 3,135 3,235 1,294 1997 1997 

        068 Lufkin, TX

          100 1,950  100 1,950 2,050 840 1996 1996   100 1,950  100 1,950 2,050 888 1996 1996 

        119 Madison, IN

          100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 954 1997 1997   100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 1,013 1997 1997 

        061 Marshall, TX

          38 1,568 451 38 2,019 2,057 894 1995 1995   38 1,568 451 38 2,019 2,057 945 1995 1995 

        058 McPherson, KS

          79 1,571 4 79 1,575 1,654 774 1994 1995   79 1,571 4 79 1,575 1,654 819 1994 1995 

        239 Merritt Island, FL

          550 8,150  550 8,150 8,700 559 2004 2010   550 8,150  550 8,150 8,700 818 2004 2010 

        104 Millville, NJ

          100 2,825  100 2,825 2,925 1,114 1997 1997   100 2,825  100 2,825 2,925 1,183 1997 1997 

        231 Monroeville, PA

          526 5,334 435 526 5,769 6,295 540 1997 2009   526 5,334 435 526 5,769 6,295 743 1997 2009 

        082 Nampa, ID

          100 2,240 23 100 2,263 2,363 929 1997 1997   100 2,240 23 100 2,263 2,363 985 1997 1997 

        166 New Bern, NC

          100 2,427 1 100 2,428 2,528 739 1998 1999   100 2,427 1 100 2,428 2,528 790 1998 1999 

        118 Newark, OH

          100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 954 1997 1997   100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 1,013 1997 1997 

        123 Newport Richey, FL

          100 5,845 664 100 6,509 6,609 2,804 1995 1998   100 5,845 664 100 6,509 6,609 2,994 1995 1998 

        074 Newport, OR

          100 2,050  100 2,050 2,150 1,064 1996 1996   100 2,050  100 2,050 2,150 1,140 1996 1996 

        143 Niceville, FL

          100 2,680  100 2,680 2,780 1,003 1998 1998   100 2,680  100 2,680 2,780 1,069 1998 1998 

        095 Norfolk, NE

          100 2,123  100 2,123 2,223 848 1997 1997   100 2,123  100 2,123 2,223 900 1997 1997 

        232 Pittsburgh, PA

          470 2,615 333 470 2,948 3,418 294 1994 2009   470 2,615 333 470 2,948 3,418 411 1994 2009 

        165 Rocky Mount, NC

          100 2,494 1 100 2,495 2,595 783 1998 1999   100 2,494 1 100 2,495 2,595 837 1998 1999 

        141 Rocky River, OH

          760 6,963  760 6,963 7,723 2,587 1998 1999   760 6,963  760 6,963 7,723 2,751 1998 1999 

        059 Salina, KS

          79 1,571 4 79 1,575 1,654 774 1994 1995   79 1,571 4 79 1,575 1,654 819 1994 1995 

        084 San Antonio, TX

          100 1,900  100 1,900 2,000 769 1997 1997   100 1,900  100 1,900 2,000 815 1997 1997 

        092 San Antonio, TX

          100 2,055  100 2,055 2,155 825 1997 1997   100 2,055  100 2,055 2,155 876 1997 1997 

        149 Shelby, NC

          100 2,805 2 100 2,807 2,907 1,049 1998 1998   100 2,805 2 100 2,807 2,907 1,118 1998 1998 

        150 Spring Hill, FL

          100 2,650  100 2,650 2,750 992 1998 1998   100 2,650  100 2,650 2,750 1,057 1998 1998 

        103 Springfield, OH

          100 2,035 270 100 2,305 2,405 904 1997 1997   100 2,035 270 100 2,305 2,405 961 1997 1997 

        162 Sumter, SC

          100 2,351  100 2,351 2,451 776 1998 1999   100 2,351  100 2,351 2,451 828 1998 1999 

        140 Tallahassee, FL

          100 3,075  100 3,075 3,175 1,153 1998 1998   100 3,075  100 3,075 3,175 1,229 1998 1998 

        098 Tiffin, OH

          100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 964 1997 1997   100 2,435  100 2,435 2,535 1,023 1997 1997 

        088 Troy, OH

          100 2,435 306 100 2,741 2,841 1,090 1997 1997   100 2,435 306 100 2,741 2,841 1,157 1997 1997 

        080 Tulsa, OK

          200 1,650  200 1,650 1,850 678 1997 1997   200 1,650  200 1,650 1,850 718 1997 1997 

        093 Tulsa, OK

          100 2,395  100 2,395 2,495 958 1997 1997   100 2,395  100 2,395 2,495 1,017 1997 1997 

        238 Tupelo, MS

          1,170 8,230  1,170 8,230 9,400 595 2000 2010   1,170 8,230  1,170 8,230 9,400 870 2000 2010 

        075 Tyler, TX

          100 1,800  100 1,800 1,900 744 1996 1996   100 1,800  100 1,800 1,900 788 1996 1996 

        202 Vacaville, CA

          1,662 11,634 1,141 1,662 12,775 14,437 3,902 2002 2001   1,662 11,634 1,141 1,662 12,775 14,437 4,300 2002 2001 

        025 Vancouver, WA

         (3) 100 2,785  100 2,785 2,885 1,184 1996 1996  (3) 100 2,785  100 2,785 2,885 1,252 1996 1996 

        091 Waco, TX

          100 2,235  100 2,235 2,335 896 1997 1997   100 2,235  100 2,235 2,335 950 1997 1997 

        096 Wahoo, NE

          100 2,318  100 2,318 2,418 918 1997 1997   100 2,318  100 2,318 2,418 975 1997 1997 

        023 Walla Walla, WA

         2,635(3) 100 1,940  100 1,940 2,040 836 1996 1996  2,035(3) 100 1,940  100 1,940 2,040 884 1996 1996 

        108 Watauga, TX

          100 1,668  100 1,668 1,768 664 1996 1997   100 1,668  100 1,668 1,768 705 1996 1997 

        109 Weatherford, OK

          100 1,669 592 100 2,261 2,361 888 1996 1997   100 1,669 592 100 2,261 2,361 943 1996 1997 

        110 Wheelersburg, OH

          29 2,435  29 2,435 2,464 954 1997 1997   29 2,435  29 2,435 2,464 1,013 1997 1997 

        259 Wichita, KS

          730  9,131 730 9,131 9,861 64 2013 2012 

        076 Wichita Falls, TX

          100 1,850  100 1,850 1,950 764 1996 1996   100 1,850  100 1,850 1,950 810 1996 1996 

        120 Wichita Falls, TX

          100 2,750  100 2,750 2,850 1,079 1997 1997   100 2,750  100 2,750 2,850 1,147 1997 1997 

        264 Williamstown, NJ

          711 8,649  711 8,649 9,360  2000 2012   711 8,649  711 8,649 9,360 253 2000 2012 

        265 Williamstown, NJ

          711 6,637  711 6,637 7,348  2000 2012   711 6,637  711 6,637 7,348 215 2000 2012 

        138 Worthington, OH

           6,102   6,102 6,102 3,953 1993 2001    6,102   6,102 6,102 4,398 1993 2001 

        139 Worthington, OH

           3,402   3,402 3,402 2,233 1995 2001    3,402   3,402 3,402 2,475 1995 2001 

        099 York, NE

          100 2,318  100 2,318 2,418 918 1997 1997   100 2,318  100 2,318 2,418 975 1997 1997 
                                                

        Assisted Living Properties

         2,635 26,570 343,162 10,137 26,570 353,299 379,869 96,901      2,035 29,182 343,162 27,568 29,182 370,730 399,912 107,337     
                                                

        Range of Care Properties:

        Range of Care Properties:

         

        Range of Care Properties:

                           

        007 Bradenton, FL

          330 2,720 160 330 2,880 3,210 1,639 2002 1993 

        199 Brownsville, TX

          302 1,856 835 302 2,691 2,993 687 2009 2004   302 1,856 835 302 2,691 2,993 783 2009 2004 

        168 Des Moines, IA(3)

          115 2,096 1,433 115 3,529 3,644 1,623 1972 1999 

        168 Des Moines, IA(2)

          115 2,096 1,433 115 3,529 3,644 1,710 1972 1999 

        26A Gardendale, AL

          84 6,316 2,084 84 8,400 8,484 3,277 2009 1996   84 6,316 2,084 84 8,400 8,484 3,574 2009 1996 

        26B Gardendale, AL

          16 1,234  16 1,234 1,250 644 1988 1996 


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE III

        REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

        (in thousands)


          
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2012
          
          
          
           
          
          
          
         Gross amount at which carried at
        December 31, 2013
          
          
          
         

          
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
           
         Initial cost to company Costs
        capitalized
        subsequent
        to
        acquisition
          
          
          
         

         Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
          Encumbrances Land Building and
        improvements
         Land Building and
        improvements
         Total(1) Accum
        deprec.
         Construction/
        renovation date
         Acquisition
        date
         

        26B Gardendale, AL

          16 1,234  16 1,234 1,250 610 1988 1996 

        194 Holyoke, CO

          211 1,513 283 211 1,796 2,007 883 1963 2000   211 1,513 283 211 1,796 2,007 919 1963 2000 

        008 Lecanto, FL

          351 2,665 2,737 351 5,402 5,753 2,879 2006 1993 

        245 Newberry, SC

          439 4,639 608 439 5,247 5,686 375 1995 2011   439 4,639 608 439 5,247 5,686 621 1995 2011 

        244 Newberry, SC

          919 5,454 131 919 5,585 6,504 385 2001 2011   919 5,454 131 919 5,585 6,504 601 2001 2011 

        236 Wytheville, VA

          647 12,692  647 12,692 13,339 1,469 1996 2010   647 12,692  647 12,692 13,339 2,037 1996 2010 
                                                

        Range of Care Properties

          3,414 41,185 8,271 3,414 49,456 52,870 13,827       2,733 35,800 5,374 2,733 41,174 43,907 10,889     
                                                

        School:

         

        Other:

        Other:

                           

        Schools:

        Schools:

                           

        237 Eagan, MN

          1,110 1,789 157 1,110 1,946 3,056 220 1994 2010   1,110 1,789 275 1,110 2,064 3,174 392 1994 2010 

        159 Trenton, NJ

          100 6,000 3,170 100 9,170 9,270 4,178 1998 1998   100 6,000 3,170 100 9,170 9,270 4,483 1998 1998 
                                                

        School

          1,210 7,789 3,327 1,210 11,116 12,326 4,398     

        Schools

          1,210 7,789 3,445 1,210 11,234 12,444 4,875     
                                                

        Land:

        Land:

                           

        271 Howell, MI

          420   420  420  N/A 2013 

        273 Richmond, MI

          380   380  380  N/A 2013 

        274 Rochester Hills, MI

          290   290  290  N/A 2013 

        275 Yale, MI

          73   73  73  N/A 2013 
                             

        Land

          1,163   1,163  1,163      
                             

        Other

          2,373 7,789 3,445 2,373 11,234 13,607 4,875     
                             

        Properties Under Development:

        Properties Under Development:

                              

        252 Amarillo, TX

          844  2,747 844 2,747 3,591  N/A 2011 

        268 Littleton, CO

          1,200  2,170 1,200 2,170 3,370  N/A 2013 

        269 Aurora, CO

          850  655 850 655 1,505  N/A 2013 

        276 Westminster, CO

          1,425  1,015 1,425 1,015 2,440  N/A 2013 

        268 Coldspring, KY

          2,050 2,688 32 2,050 2,720 4,770  N/A 2012   2,050 2,688 5,893 2,050 8,581 10,631  N/A 2012 

        267 Frisco, TX

          1,000  47 1,000 47 1,047  N/A 2012   1,000  2,486 1,000 2,486 3,486  N/A 2012 

        255 Littleton, CO

          1,882  3,748 1,882 3,748 5,630  N/A 2012 

        259 Wichita, KS

          730  874 730 874 1,604  N/A 2012 
                                                

        Properties Under Development

          6,506 2,688 7,448 6,506 10,136 16,642        6,525 2,688 12,219 6,525 14,907 21,432      
                                                

         $2,635 $75,407 $767,914 $56,774 $75,407 $824,688 $900,095(4)$198,548      $2,035 $80,993 $771,649 $84,975 $80,993 $856,624 $937,617(4)$218,700     
                                                
                             

        (1)
        Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes which generally range of a life from 75 to 15 years for furniture and equipment, 35 to 45 years for buildings, 10 to 20 years for building improvements and the respective lease term for acquired lease intangibles.
        (2)
        An impairment charge totaling $4,190 was taken against 4 facilities based on the Company's estimate of the excess carrying value over the fair value of assets to be held and used, and the carrying value over the fair value less cost to sell in instances where management has determined that the company will dispose of the property.
        (3)
        Single note backed by five facilities in Washington.
        (4)
        As of December 31, 2012,2013, our aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes was $915,408.$954,795.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE III

        REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

        (in thousands)

                Activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 is as follows:


         For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 

         2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

        Reconciliation of real estate:

                

        Carrying cost:

                

        Balance at beginning of period

         $725,031 $615,666 $519,460  $900,095 $725,031 $615,666 

        Acquisitions

         166,750 106,135 94,250  19,040 166,750 106,135 

        Improvements

         11,219 3,230 5,941  32,008 11,219 3,230 

        Conversion of mortgage loans into owned properties

           2,900     

        Impairment charges

                

        Cost of real estate sold

         (2,905)  (6,885) (13,526) (2,905)  
                      

        Ending balance

         $900,095 $725,031 $615,666  $937,617 $900,095 $725,031 
               
                      

        Accumulated depreciation:

                

        Balance at beginning of period

         $178,196 $158,709 $145,180  $198,548 $178,196 $158,709 

        Depreciation Expense

         22,002 19,487 16,016  24,568 22,002 19,487 

        Conversion of mortgage loans into owned properties

                

        Impairment charges

                

        Cost of real estate sold

         (1,650)  (2,487) (4,416) (1,650)  
                      

        Ending balance

         $198,548 $178,196 $158,709  $218,700 $198,548 $178,196 
                      
               


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE IV

        MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

        (in thousands)


          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
         Principal
        Amount of
        Loans
        Subject to
        Delinquent
        Principal or
        Interest
           
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
         Principal
        Amount of
        Loans
        Subject to
        Delinquent
        Principal or
        Interest
         

         (Unaudited)
        Number of
          
          
          
          
          
         Carrying
        Amount of
        Mortgages
        December 31,
        2012
          (Unaudited)
        Number of
          
          
          
          
          
         Carrying
        Amount of
        Mortgages
        December 31,
        2013
         

          
          
          
         Current
        Monthly
        Debt
        Service
          
        Principal
        Amount of
        Loans
        Subject to
        Delinquent
        Principal or
        Interest
          
          
          
         Current
        Monthly
        Debt
        Service
          
        Principal
        Amount of
        Loans
        Subject to
        Delinquent
        Principal or
        Interest

          
         Final
        Maturity Date
         Balloon
        Amount(2)
         Face
        Amount of
        Mortgages
          
         Final
        Maturity Date
         Balloon
        Amount(2)
         Face
        Amount of
        Mortgages
        State
         Properties Units/Beds(3) Interest Rate(1) Properties Units/Beds(3) Interest Rate(1)

        FL

         3 269 11.80% 2014 $6,061 $71 $6,850 $6,278 $ 3 269 11.90% 2014 $6,061 $72 $6,850 $6,166 $

        MI

         15 2,092 9.53% 2043 97,387 988 124,387 124,387 

        TX

         6 100 10.10% 2018 5,095 66 6,800 6,231   6 100 10.25% 2018 5,095 67 6,800 6,067  

        PA

         1 70 7.00% 2014 5,100 30 5,100 5,100   1 70 7.00% 2014 5,100 30 5,100 5,100  

        TX

         1 222 10.50% 2017 2,972 40 4,000 3,586  

        MO

         1 100 11.10% 2018 1,869 40 1,500 2,877  

        CA

         1 173 11.38% 2015 2,232 48 4,700 2,862  

        WI

         1 106 9.17% 2022 (4) 20 2,619 2,619   1 106 10.10% 2022  63 2,619 7,590  

        TX

         1 117 10.50% 2017 1,634 22 2,200 1,973  

        UT

         1 84 10.45% 2019 1,006 14 1,400 1,302  

        Various

         10 1,004 10.63%-13.50% 2014-2018 935 132 15,215 6,471   15 1,700 10.60%-13.63% 2014-2019 10,648 317 27,715 16,134  
                                            

         26(5) 2,245     $26,904 $483 $50,384 $39,299 $  41(4) 4,337     $124,291 $1,537 $173,471 $165,444 $ 
                                            
                           

        (1)
        Represents current stated interest rate. Generally, the loans have 25-year amortization with principal and interest payable at varying amounts over the life to maturity with annual interest adjustments through specified fixed rate increases effective either on the first anniversary or calendar year of the loan.
        (2)
        Balloon payment is due upon maturity.
        (3)
        This number is based upon unit/bed counts shown on operating licenses provided to us by lessees/borrowers or units/beds as stipulated by lease/mortgage documents. We have found during the years that these numbers often differ, usually not materially, from units/beds in operation at any point in time. The differences are caused by such things as operators converting a patient/resident room for alternative uses, such as offices or storage, or converting a multi-patient room/unit into a single patient room/unit. We monitor our properties on a routine basis through site visits and reviews of current licenses. In an instance where such change would cause a de-licensing of beds or in our opinion impact the value of the property, we would take action against the lessee/borrower to preserve the value of the property/collateral.
        (4)
        The balloon amount for this mortgage and construction loan will be determined when the loan is fully funded.
        (5)
        Includes 20 first-lien mortgage loans as follows:

        Number of Loans
         Original loan amounts

        1312

         $   500 - $  2,000$2,000

        2

         $2,001 - $  3,000$3,000

        1

         $3,001 - $  4,000$4,000

        1

         $4,001 - $  5,000$5,000

        1

         $5,001 - $  6,000$6,000

        2

         $6,001 - $  7,000$7,000

        01

         $7,001 - $10,000+          


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SCHEDULE IV

        MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE (Continued)

        (in thousands)

          Activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 is as follows:

        Balance—December 31, 2009

         $69,883 

        New Mortgage Loans

          1,622 

        Other Additions

          72 

        Amortization of mortgage premium

          (121)

        Collections of principal

          (8,403)

        Foreclosures

          (2,900)

        Loan Loss Reserve

          108 

        Other Deductions

          (1,235)
            

        Balance—December 31, 2010

          59,026 

        New Mortgage Loans

           

        Other Additions

           

        Amortization of mortgage premium

          (38)

        Collections of principal

          (5,967)

        Foreclosures

           

        Loan Loss Reserve

          60 

        Other Deductions

           
            

        Balance—December 31, 2011

          53,081 

        New Mortgage Loans

          7,719 

        Other Additions

           

        Amortization of mortgage premium

          (7)

        Collections of principal

          (21,633)

        Foreclosures

           

        Loan Loss Reserve

          139 

        Other Deductions

           
            

        Balance—December 31, 2012

         $39,299 
            

        Balance—December 31, 2010

         $59,026 

        New mortgage loans

           

        Other additions

           

        Amortization of mortgage premium

          (38)

        Collections of principal

          (5,967)

        Foreclosures

           

        Loan loss reserve

          60 

        Other deductions

           
            

        Balance—December 31, 2011

          53,081 

        New mortgage loans

          7,719 

        Other additions

           

        Amortization of mortgage premium

          (7)

        Collections of principal

          (21,633)

        Foreclosures

           

        Loan loss reserve

          139 

        Other deductions

           
            

        Balance—December 31, 2012

          39,299 

        New mortgage loans

          124,387 

        Other additions

          4,971 

        Amortization of mortgage premium

          (6)

        Collections of principal

          (1,933)

        Foreclosures

           

        Loan loss reserve

          (1,274)

        Other deductions

           
            

        Balance—December 31, 2013

         $165,444 
            
            

        Item 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

                None.

        Item 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

                Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

        Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

                The Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon are set forth on pages 85 and 85, respectively.the following pages.

                There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

        Item 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

                None.



        MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

                Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the issuer's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

          Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

          Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

          Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

                Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

                Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (or COSO) in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

                The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, has been audited by Ernst &Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young LLP's report on our internal control over financial reporting appears on page 85.the following page.



        Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

        To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of LTC Properties, Inc.

                We have audited LTC Properties, Inc.'s (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria).The. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

                We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

                A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

                Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

                In our opinion, LTC Properties, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on the COSO criteria.

                We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of LTC Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122013 of LTC Properties, Inc. and our report dated February 21, 201320, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


         

         

        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

        Los Angeles, California
        February 21, 201320, 2014

         

         


        PART III

        Item 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

                The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20122013 fiscal year end) under the headings "Proposal 1 Election of Directors," "Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters," and "Executive Officers."

        Item 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

                The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20122013 fiscal year end) under the headings "Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Summary Compensation Table," "Director Compensation," and "Compensation Committee Report."

        Item 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

                The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20122013 fiscal year end) under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters."

        Item 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

                The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20122013 fiscal year end) under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence."

        Item 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

                The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20122013 fiscal year end) under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services."



        PART IV

        Item 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

                The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

         
         Page

        Financial Statements

          

        Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

         
        5453

        Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012


        54

        Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

         
        55

        Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010


        56

        Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

         
        5756

        Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

         
        5857

        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

         
        5958

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

         
        6059

        Financial Statement Schedules

         
         

          II.  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

         
        86

         III.  Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

         
        87

         IV.  Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

         
        92

                All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.

        Exhibits

                The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are set forth in the index to exhibits on page 99 of this annual report.


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        INDEX TO EXHIBITS

        Exhibit
        Number
         Description
        3.1 LTC Properties, Inc. Articles of Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-11314) dated September 14, 2012)

        3.2

         

        Bylaws of LTC Properties, Inc., as amended and restated August 3, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)

        10.1

         

        Credit Agreement dated as of April 18, 2011 among LTC Properties, Inc. and Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch as Administrative Agent, BMO Capital Markets, as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, and Key Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-11314) dated April 19, 2011)

        10.2

         

        First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 25, 2012 among LTC Properties, Inc. and the Guarantors party thereto and Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch as Administrative Agent, BMO Capital Markets, as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, and Key Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated (File No. 1-11314) May 30, 2012)

        10.3

         

        Second Amended and Restated Equity Distribution Agreement, dated October 26, 2010, between LTC Properties, Inc. and KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2010)
        10.4Equity Distribution Agreement, dated October 26, 2010, between LTC Properties, Inc. and BMO Capital Markets Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2010)
        10.5Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement between LTC Properties, Inc. and Prudential Investment Management, Inc. dated July 14, 2010October 30, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010)2013)
        10.6
        10.4

         
        Amendment and Modification to Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated May 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2011)
        10.7Amendment and Modification to Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated July 8, 2011 between LTC Properties, Inc. and Prudential Investment Management, Inc. dated July 8, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011)
        10.8Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated October 19, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 19, 2011)
        10.9Amendment to Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated May 25, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 30, 2012)
        10.10
        Note Purchase Agreement dated July 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)

        Exhibit
        Number
        Description
        10.11+Second Amendment to 2007 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Andre Dimitriadis, dated July 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007)
        10.12+
        10.5+

         

        Third Amendment to the 2007 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Wendy Simpson dated December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-11314) dated December 5, 2007)
        10.13+
        10.6+

         

        Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Pamela Kessler, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2007)
        10.14+
        10.7+

         

        Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Clint Malin, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2007)
        10.15+
        10.8+

         

        Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of T. Andrew Stokes, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2007)
        10.16
        10.9+

         

        Employment Agreement of Caroline L. (Wong) Chikhale, effective as of June 10, 2008

        10.10+


        Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Peter G. Lyew, effective as of December 4, 2007

        10.11


        The 2008 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2009)

        Exhibit
        Number
        Description
        10.1710.12 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2009)
        10.18
        10.13

         

        Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1010.1 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q (File No. 1-11314) for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2009)June 30, 2013)
        10.19
        10.14

         

        Form of Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 30, 2009 between LTC Properties, Inc. and its Directors and Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)

        12

         

        Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

        21

         

        List of Subsidiaries

        23.1

         

        Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm

        31.1

         

        Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        31.2

         

        Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        32

         

        Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        101

         

        The following materials from LTC Properties, Inc.'s Form Annual Report on 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2013, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements*Statements

        +
        Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which an executive officer or director of the Company participates
        *
        Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections


        LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

        SIGNATURES

                Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

          LTC PROPERTIES, INC.
        Registrant

        Dated: February 21, 201320, 2014

         

         

         

         
          By: /s/ PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER

        PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER
        Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
        Officer and Corporate Secretary
        (Principal Financial Officer)


        POWER OF ATTORNEY

                Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

        /s/ WENDY L. SIMPSON

        WENDY L. SIMPSON
         Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
        President
        and Director
        (Principal Executive Officer)
         February 21, 201320, 2014

        /s/ PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER

        PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER

         

        Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
        Officer and Corporate Secretary
        (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
        Accounting Officer)

         

        February 21, 2013

        /s/ ANDRE C. DIMITRIADIS

        ANDRE C. DIMITRIADIS


        Executive Chairman of the Board
        and Director


        February 21, 201320, 2014

        /s/ BOYD HENDRICKSON

        BOYD HENDRICKSON

         

        Director

         

        February 21, 201320, 2014

        /s/ DEVRA G. SHAPIRO

        DEVRA G. SHAPIRO

         

        Director

         

        February 21, 201320, 2014

        /s/ EDMUND C. KING

        EDMUND C. KING

         

        Director

         

        February 21, 201320, 2014

        /s/ TIMOTHY J. TRICHE

        TIMOTHY TRICHE

         

        Director

         

        February 21, 201320, 2014