Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

(Mark One)


ý


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20132015


or


o



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from                      to                   

Commission file number 001-33288

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

06-118540006
-
1185400
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


1020 West Park Avenue, Kokomo, Indiana

(Address of principal executive offices)



46904-901346904
-
9013
(Zip Code)

         Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code(765) 456-6000

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $.001 per share

NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownwell-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
o Yes     ý No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.o Yes     ý No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.ý Yes     o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-TS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).ý Yes     o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-KS-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.10ý-K. ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-acceleratednon-accelerated filer. (See definition of "accelerated“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer"filer” in Rule 12b-212b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):

Large accelerated filero

Accelerated filerý

Non-acceleratedNon-accelerated filero

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller Reporting Companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-212b-2 of the Act).o Yesý No

 

As of March 31, 2013,2015, the aggregate market value of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock held by non-affiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant was $571,693,391$412,153,976 based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 12,332,592

12,446,000 shares of Haynes International, Inc. common stock were outstanding as of November 20, 2013.18, 2015.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant'sregistrant’s Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held February 24, 2014March 1, 2016 have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.



TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page No.

Part I


Item 1.



Business





3

Page No.


Part I


Item 1A.



Risk Factors





17


Item 1.


Business

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

17 

Item 1B.



Unresolved Staff Comments



28 


27


Item 2.



Properties


Properties




27
28 


Item 3.



Legal Proceedings



29 


28


Item 4.



Mine Safety Disclosures



30 


29


Part II








Item 5.



Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



31 


30


Item 6.



Selected Financial Data



32 


32


Item 7.



Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations



34 


34


Item 7A.



Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk



50 


52


Item 8.



Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



51 


53


Item 9.



Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure



83 


92


Item 9A.



Controls and Procedures



83 


92


Item 9B.



Other Information



84 


93


Part III








Item 10.



Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance



85 


94


Item 11.



Executive Compensation



85 


94


Item 12.



Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters



85 


94


Item 13.



Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence



85 


94


Item 14.



Principal Accountant Fees and Services



86 


95


Part IV








Item 15.



Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules



87 


96

Signatures


Signatures



88 


97


Index to Exhibits



89 


99

1


This Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements"“forward‑looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding market and industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position, made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K are forward-looking.forward‑looking. In many cases, you can identify forward-lookingforward‑looking statements by terminology, such as "may"“may”, "should"“should”, "expects"“expects”, "intends"“intends”, "plans"“plans”, "anticipates"“anticipates”, "believes"“believes”, "estimates"“estimates”, "predicts"“predicts”, "potential"“potential” or "continue"“continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. The forward-lookingforward‑looking information may include, among other information, statements concerning the Company'sCompany’s outlook for fiscal year 20142016 and beyond, overall volume and pricing trends, cost reduction strategies and their anticipated results, market and industry trends, capital expenditures and dividends. There may also be other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-lookingforward‑looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those risk factors set forth in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company'sCompany’s control.

The Company has based these forward-lookingforward‑looking statements on its current expectations and projections about future events. Although the Company believes that the assumptions on which the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements contained herein are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. As a result, the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements based upon those assumptions also could be incorrect. Risks and uncertainties may affect the accuracy of forward-lookingforward‑looking statements.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-lookingforward‑looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

3


Part I


Part I

Item 1.  Business
Busines
s

Overview

Haynes International, Inc. ("Haynes"(“Haynes” or "the Company"“the Company”) is one of the world'sworld’s largest producers of high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloys in flat product form such as sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company is focused on developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing technologically advanced, high-performancehigh‑performance alloys, which are sold primarily in the aerospace, chemical processing and land-basedland‑based gas turbine industries. The Company'sCompany’s products consist of high-temperaturehigh‑temperature resistant alloys, or HTA products, and corrosion-resistantcorrosion‑resistant alloys, or CRA products. HTA products are used by manufacturers of equipment that is subjected to extremely high temperatures, such as jet engines for the aerospace market, gas turbine engines used for power generation and waste incineration, and industrial heating equipment. CRA products are used in applications that require resistance to very corrosive media found in chemical processing, power plant emissions control and hazardous waste treatment. Management believes Haynes is one of the principal producers of high-performancehigh‑performance alloy flat products in sheet, coil and plate forms, and sales of these forms, in the aggregate, represented approximately 61%60% of net product revenues in fiscal 2013.2015. The Company also produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars, and in slab, bar, billet and wire forms.

The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Arcadia, Louisiana; and Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Kokomo facility specializes in flat products, the Arcadia facility specializes in tubular products, and the Mountain Home facility specializes in wire products. The Company'sCompany’s products are sold primarily through its direct sales organization, which includes 1314 service and/or sales centers in the United States, Europe and Asia. All of these centers are Company-operated.Company‑operated. In fiscal 2013,2015, approximately 77% of the Company'sCompany’s net revenue was generated by its direct sales organization, and the remaining 23% was generated by a network of independent distributors and sales agents whothat supplement its direct sales


Table of Contents

efforts primarily in the United States, Europe and Asia, some of whom have been associated with the Company for over 30 years.

Available Information

The address of the Company'sCompany’s website iswww.haynesintl.com. The Company provides a link to its reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on its website as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The filings available on the Company'sCompany’s website date back to February 3, 2011. For all filings made prior to that date, the Company'sCompany’s website includes a link to the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, where such filings are available. Information contained or referenced on the Company'sCompany’s website is not incorporated by reference and does not form a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K. For a statement of the Company'sCompany’s profits and losses and total assets, please see the financial statements of the Company included in Item 88. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

Business Strategy

The Company'sCompany’s goal is to grow its business by increasing revenues, profitability and increase revenues and profitabilitycash flow while continuing to be its customers'customers’ provider of choice for high-performancehigh‑performance alloys. The Company pursues this goal by taking advantage of its diverse product offeringsexpert technical abilities in delivering innovative products and applications combined with its niche manufacturing and value-added service capabilities to penetrate end markets, provide value-added services, deliver innovative productsmarkets.

·

Increase revenues by inventing new alloys and applications and lowering costs through strategic investment in manufacturing facilities.

    Increase revenues by providing value-added processing services.  The Company believes that its network of service and sales centers throughout North America, Europe and Asia distinguishes it from its competitors, many of whom operate only mills. The Company's service and sales centers enable it to develop close customer relationships through direct interaction with customers and to respond to customer orders quickly, while providing value-added services such as laser, plasma and water jet processing. These services allow the Company's customers to minimize their processing costs and outsource non-core activities. In addition, the Company's rapid response time and enhanced processing services for products shipped from its service and sales centers often enable the Company to obtain a selling price advantage. The Company is planning to spend approximately $24 million over the course of fiscal 2014 and 2015 to enhance and restructure its service center operations.

    Increase revenue by developing new products and new applications for existing alloys and expanding into new markets.  The Company believes that it is the industry leader in developing new alloys designed to meet its customers’ specialized and demanding requirements. The Company continues to work closely with customers and end users of its products to identify, develop, manufacture and test new high‑performance alloys. Since fiscal 2003, the Company’s technical programs have yielded eight new proprietary alloys, an accomplishment that the Company believes distinguishes it from its competitors. The Company expects continued emphasis on product innovation to yield similar future results.

Developing new applications for existing alloys is also a key strength and expanding into new markets.strategy of the Company.  The Company believes that it is the industry leader in developing new alloys designedleverages its technical expertise to meet its customers' specialized and demanding requirements. The Company continues to work closely with customers and end users offind unique applications for its products to identify, develop, manufactureespecially proprietary and test new high-performance alloys. Since fiscal 2000,specialty alloys that can yield higher margins. 

4


Developing additional markets is a key strategy of the Company's technical programs have yielded eight new proprietary alloys; an accomplishment that the Company believes distinguishes it from its competitors. The Company expects continued emphasis on product innovation to yield similar future results.


last leveraged buy‑out ultimately forced the Company into bankruptcy in March 2004, from which it emerged five months later in August 2004.

Table of Contents

Company History

The Company began operations for its tubular facility in 1912 asArcadia, Louisiana over 30 years ago. This facility and the Haynes Stellite Works, which was purchased by Union Carbide and Carbon CorporationCompany’s tubular product business have grown with additional investment over time. The Company operated service centers in 1920. In 1972, the operations were sold to Cabot Corporation. In 1987, Haynes was incorporated as a stand-alone corporation in Delaware, and in 1989 Haynes was sold by Cabot Corporation to Morgan Lewis Githens & Ahn Inc., a private investment firm. The Blackstone Group, a private investment firm, purchased Haynes from Morgan Lewis Githens & Ahn Inc. in 1997. On March 29, 2004, Haynes and its U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates as of that date filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On August 31, 2004, Haynes emerged from bankruptcy pursuant tothat include value-added operations with laser, water-jet and plasma cutting.  In addition the Company

5


has expanded globally with service center locations in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, China and other sales offices in France, Japan, Singapore, India and Italy. The Company also acquired a court-approved plan of reorganization.

        In November 2005, Haynes acquired certain assets of the Branford Wire Company, including a facility that manufactured both stainless steel and high‑temperature alloy wire and high-performance alloy wire.company located in Mountain Home, North Carolina in 2005. The Company primarily produces high-performancehigh‑performance alloy wire at that facility.  Most recently, in January 2015, the Haynes Wire Company acquired assets in Mountain Home, North Carolina.Laporte, Indiana enabling coil stretching, leveling, slitting and cut-to-length operations.  The Laporte operation also includes a toll processing business. 

        OnIn March 23, 2007, the Company completed ana public equity offering which resulted in the issuance of 1,200,000 shares of its common stock. Simultaneouslyand simultaneously the Company listed its common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market. The Company began paying a dividend in fiscal 2010.2010 and raised the dividend at the beginning of fiscal 2012.

Products

The global specialty alloy market consists of three primary sectors: stainless steel, general purpose nickel alloys and high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloys. The Company believes that the high-performancehigh‑performance alloy sector represents less than 10% of the total alloy market. The Company competes primarily in the high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloy sectors, which includes HTA products and CRA products. In fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, HTA products accounted for approximately 76%74%, 73%75% and 74%76% of the Company'sCompany’s net revenues, respectively; and sales of the Company'sCompany’s CRA products accounted for approximately 24%26%, 27%25% and 26%24% of the Company'sCompany’s net revenues, respectively. These percentages are based on data which include revenue associated with sales by the Company to its foreign subsidiaries, but exclude revenue associated with sales by foreign subsidiaries to their customers. Management believes,


Table of Contents

however, that the effect of including revenue data associated with sales by its foreign subsidiaries would not materially change the percentages presented in this section.

        High-temperatureHigh‑temperature Resistant Alloys.  HTA products are used primarily in manufacturing components for the hot sections of gas turbine engines. Stringent safety and performance standards in the aerospace industry result in development lead times typically as long as eight to ten years in the introduction of new aerospace-relatedaerospace‑related market applications for HTA products. However, once a particular new alloy is shown to possess the properties required for a specific application in the aerospace market, it tends to remain in use for extended periods. HTA products are also used in gas turbine engines produced for use in applications such as naval and commercial vessels, electric power generation, power sources for offshore drilling platforms, gas pipeline booster stations and emergency standby power generators. The following table

6


sets forth information with respect to the Company'sCompany’s significant high-temperaturehigh‑temperature resistant alloys, applications and features (new HTA development is discussed below under "Patents“Patents and Trademarks"Trademarks”):

Alloy and Year Introduced

End Markets and Applications(1)

Features

HAYNES® HR-160 HR‑160® alloy (1990)(2)

Waste incineration/CPI-boilerCPI‑boiler tube shields

Good resistance to sulfidation at high temperatures

HAYNES 242® alloy (1990)(2)

Aero-seal

Aero‑seal rings

High strength, low expansion and good fabricability

HAYNES HR-120HR‑120® alloy (1990)(2)

LBGT-cooling

LBGT‑cooling shrouds

Good strength-to-coststrength‑to‑cost ratio as compared to competing alloys

HAYNES 230® alloy (1984)(2)

Aero/LBGT-ducting,LBGT‑ducting, combustors

Excellent combination of strength, stability, oxidation resistanceoxidation-resistance and fabricability

HAYNES 214® alloy (1981)(2)

Aero-honeycomb

Aero‑honeycomb seals

Excellent combination of oxidation resistance and fabricatingfabricability among nickel-basednickel‑based alloys

HAYNES 188 alloy (1968)(2)

Aero-burner

Aero‑burner cans, after-burnerafter‑burner components

High strength, oxidation resistant cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloy

HAYNES 625 alloy (1964)

Aero/CPI-ducting,CPI‑ducting, tanks, vessels, weld overlays

Good fabricability and general corrosion resistance

HAYNES 617 alloy (1999)

Aero/LBGT—ducting, combustors

Good combination of strength, stability, oxidation resistance and fabricability

HAYNES 263 alloy (1960)

Aero/LBGT-componentsLBGT‑components for gas turbine hot gas exhaust pan

Good ductility and high strength at temperatures up to 1600°F

HAYNES 718 alloy (1955)

Aero-ducting,

Aero‑ducting, vanes, nozzles

Weldable, high strengthhigh-strength alloy with good fabricability

HASTELLOY® X alloy (1954)

Aero/LBGT-burnerLBGT‑burner cans, transition ducts

Good high temperaturehigh-temperature strength at relatively low cost

HAYNES 25 alloy (1950)(2)

Aero-gas

Aero‑gas turbine parts, bearings, and various industrial applications

Excellent strength, good oxidation resistance to 1800°F

HAYNES 282® alloy (2004)(3)

Aero /LBGT components

Excellent high temperature strength, weldability and fabricability


(1)

“Aero” refers to the aerospace industry; “LBGT” refers to the land‑based gas turbine industry; “CPI” refers to the chemical processing industry.

(1)
"Aero" refers to the aerospace industry; "LBGT" refers to the land-based gas turbine industry; "CPI" refers to the chemical processing industry.

(2)
Represents a product which the Company believes has limited or no significant competition.

(3)
Patent filing date.

(2)

Represents a product which the Company believes has limited competition.

(3)

Patent filing date.

        Corrosion-resistantCorrosion‑resistant Alloys.  CRA products are used in a variety of applications, such as chemical processing, power plant emissions control, hazardous waste treatment, sour gas production and pharmaceutical vessels. Historically, the chemical processing market has represented the largest end-user


Table of Contents

end‑user sector for CRA products. Due to maintenance, safety and environmental considerations, the Company believes this market continues to represent an area of potential long-termlong‑term growth. Unlike aerospace applications within the HTA product market, the development of new market applications for CRA products generally does not require long lead times. The following table sets forth information with respect to certain

7


of the Company'sCompany’s significant corrosion-resistantcorrosion‑resistant alloys, applications and features (new CRA development is discussed below under "Patents“Patents and Trademarks"Trademarks”):

Alloy and Year Introduced

End Markets and Applications(1)

Features

HASTELLOY C-2000C‑2000® alloy (1995)(2)

CPI-tanks,

CPI‑tanks, mixers, piping

Versatile alloy with good resistance to uniform corrosion

HASTELLOY B-3B‑3® alloy (1994)(2)

CPI-acetic

CPI‑acetic acid plants

Better fabrication characteristics compared to other nickel-molybdenumnickel‑molybdenum alloys

HASTELLOY D-205D‑205® alloy (1993)(2)

CPI-plate

CPI‑plate heat exchangers

Corrosion resistance to hot concentrated sulfuric acid

ULTIMET® alloy (1990)(2)

CPI-pumps,

CPI‑pumps, valves

Wear and corrosion resistant nickel-basednickel‑based alloy

HASTELLOY C-22C‑22® alloy (1985)

CPI/FGD-tanks,FGD‑tanks, mixers, piping

Resistance to localized corrosion and pitting

HASTELLOY G-30G‑30® alloy (1985)(2)

CPI-tanks,

CPI‑tanks, mixers, piping

Lower cost alloy

Alloy with good corrosion resistance in phosphoric acid

HASTELLOY G-35G‑35® alloy (2004)(2)

CPI-tanks,

CPI‑tanks, heat exchangers, piping

Improved corrosion resistance to phosphoric acid with excellent resistance to corrosion in highly oxidizing media

HASTELLOY C-276C‑276 alloy (1968)

CPI/FGD/oil and gas tanks, mixers, piping

Broad resistance to many environments

HASTELLOY C-22HSC‑22HS® alloy (2003)(3)

Oil & Gas/Marine tubular, shafts, fasteners

Combines very high strength with excellent corrosion resistance and toughness


(1)

“CPI” refers to the chemical processing industry; “FGD” refers to the flue gas desulfurization industry.

(1)
"CPI" refers to the chemical processing industry; "FGD" refers to the flue gas desulphurization industry.

(2)
Represents a patented product or a product which the Company believes has limited or no significant competition.

(3)
Patent filing date.

(2)

Represents a patented product or a product which the Company believes has limited or no significant competition.

(3)

Patent filing date.

Patents and Trademarks

The Company currently maintains a total of approximately 1719 published U.S. patents and applications and approximately 195200 foreign counterpart patents and applications targeted at countries with significant or potential markets for the patented products and continues to develop, manufacture and test high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloys. Since fiscal 2000,2003, the Company'sCompany’s technical programs have yielded eight new proprietary alloys, four of which are currently commercially available and four of which are being scaled-upscaled‑up to be brought to market. The alloys being commercialized saw significant further advancement in the process during fiscal 2013.2015. HAYNES 282 alloy, which management believes will have significant commercial potential for the Company in the long term, is the subject of a U.S. patent issued in 2011. HAYNES 282 alloy has excellent formability, fabricability and forgeability. The commercial launch of HAYNES 282 alloy occurred in October 2005 and, since that time, there have been a significant number of customer tests and evaluations of this product for the hot sections of gas turbines in the aerospace and land-basedland‑based gas turbine markets, as well as for automotive and other high-temperaturehigh‑temperature applications. The alloy has also been specified into a major aerospace engine component. The Company will continue to actively promote HAYNES 282 alloy through customer engineering visits and technical presentations and papers.


Table of Contents

        ForIn the chemical processing industry, HASTELLOY G-35 alloy hascustomers have found extensive applications for HASTELLOY G‑35 alloy particularly in wet phosphoric acid production. Management expects demand for this alloy will continue to grow. Commercialization of HASTELLOY C-22HSC‑22HS alloy also continued in fiscal 2013.2015. The Company continues to provide customers with samples of this alloy and makingmake technical presentations. Testing and evaluation of thethis alloy is ongoing with special emphasis on applications for the oil and gas market. TwoTo date, two major orders werehave been received and shipped for HASTELLOY C-22HSC‑22HS alloy for oil and gas applications. One of those orders wasapplications, one shipped in fiscal 2011 and the second shipped in fiscal 2012.

8


The Company believes that theits alloys (particularly HAYNES 282 alloy) are being commercialized rapidly when compared to historical trends for other proprietary alloys introduced by the Company. In addition to HAYNES 282 alloy, HASTELLOY G-35G‑35 alloy and HASTELLOY C-22HSC‑22HS alloy, commercialization is also ongoing for HASTELLOY HYBRID-BC1HYBRID‑BC1® alloy. This alloy is a CRA product with potential applications in the chemical processing industry that has demonstrated resistance to hydrochloric and sulfuric acid.

In addition to the commercialization of the above alloys, the Company continues to develop applications for new alloys not yet ready to begin the commercialization process. Two new high-temperaturehigh‑temperature alloys, HAYNES NS-163NS‑163® alloy (U.S. patent granted in 2011) and HAYNES HR-224HR‑224® alloy (U.S. patent application filed in 2008 and granted in 2013), are in the scale-upscale‑up phase. Both of these new materials are believed to have significant, medium to long-termlong‑term commercial potential. HAYNES NS-163NS‑163 alloy is a new alloy with extraordinary high-temperaturehigh‑temperature strength in sheet form, which has applications in the aerospace, land-basedland‑based gas turbine and automotive markets. Data generation and fabrication trials continued through 2013,2015, with test marketing initiated in early 2009. HAYNES HR-224HR‑224 alloy is an HTA product with superior resistance to oxidation. Scale upScale-up of this alloy is continuing and test marketing was initiated in fiscal 2010. A U.S. patent application was filed in fiscal 2012 and granted in 2013 for HAYNES 244TM alloy. This alloy has potential in aerospace and land-basedland‑based gas turbines. It combines high strength to 1400 degrees Fahrenheit with a low coefficient of thermal expansion. Scale-upScale‑up of this alloy began in fiscal 2011 and is ongoing. Most recently, HAYNES HR-235HR‑235TM was introduced in fiscal 2013. This alloy has excellent resistance to metal dusting in carbonaceous high temperature environments. Potential uses include applications in petrochemical production and syngas plants. Scale upScale-up of this alloy is well underway and material is currently being evaluated by certain key customers.

Patents or other proprietary rights are an important element of the Company'sCompany’s business. The Company'sCompany’s strategy is to file patent applications in the U.S. and any other country that represents an important potential commercial market to the Company. In addition, the Company seeks to protect technology which is important to the development of the Company'sCompany’s business. The Company also relies upon trade secret rights to protect its technologies and its development of new applications and alloys. The Company protects its trade secrets in part through confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with its customers. Trademarks on the names of many of the Company'sCompany’s alloys have also been applied for or granted in the U.S. and certain foreign countries.

While the Company believes its patents are important to its competitive position, significant barriers to entry continue to exist beyond the expiration of any patent period. These barriers to entry include the unique equipment required to produce this material and the exacting process required to achieve the desired metallurgical properties. These processing requirements include such items as specific annealing temperature, processing speeds and reduction per rolling pass. Management believes that the current alloy development program and these barriers to entry reduce the impact of patent expirations on the Company.

End Markets

The global specialty alloy market consists of stainless steels, general purpose nickel alloys and high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloys. Of this total market, the Company primarily competes in the high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloy sector. The high-performance alloy marketsector, which demands diverse specialty alloys suitable for use in precision manufacturing. Given the technologically advanced nature of the products, strict requirements of the end users and higher-growthhigher‑growth end markets, the Company


Table of Contents

believes the high-performancehigh‑performance alloy sector provides greater growth potential, higher profit margins and greater opportunities for service, product and price differentiation thanas compared to the stainless steels and general purpose nickel alloys.alloys markets. While stainless steel and general purpose nickel alloy isalloys are generally sold in bulk through third-partythird‑party distributors, the Company'sCompany’s products are sold in smaller-sizedsmaller‑sized orders which are customized and typically handled on a direct-to-customerdirect‑to‑customer basis.

Aerospace.  The Company has manufactured HTA products for the aerospace market since the late 1930s, and has developed numerous proprietary alloys for this market. Customers in the aerospace market tend to be the most demanding with respect to meeting specifications within very precise tolerances and achieving new product performance standards. Stringent safety standards and continuous efforts to reduce equipment weight and develop more fuel efficientfuel-efficient designs require close coordination between the Company and its customers in the selection and development of HTA products. As a result, sales to aerospace customers tend to be made through the Company'sCompany’s direct sales force. Demand for

9


the Company'sCompany’s products in the aerospace market is based on the new and replacement market for jet engines and the maintenance needs of operators of commercial and military aircraft. The Company specializes in the static parts included in the hot sections of the jet engine. The hot sections are subjected to substantial wear and tear and accordingly require periodic maintenance, repair and overhaul. The Company views the maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) business as an area of continuing long-termlong‑term growth.

Chemical Processing.  The chemical processing market represents a large base of customers with diverse CRA applications driven by demand for key end useend-use markets such as automobiles, housing, health care, agriculture and metals production. CRA products supplied by the Company have been used in the chemical processing market since the early 1930s. Demand for the Company'sCompany’s products in this market is driven by the level of MRO and expansion requirements of existing chemical processing facilities, as well as the construction of new facilities. The North America expansion of manufacturing of natural gas liquids willin North America is expected to be a driver of demand in this market. TheIn addition, the Company believes the extensive worldwide network of Company-ownedCompany‑owned service and sales centers, as well as its network of independent distributors and sales agents who supplement the Company'sCompany’s direct sales efforts outside of the U.S., provide a competitive advantage in marketing its CRA products in the chemical processing market.

        Land-basedLand‑based Gas Turbines.  Demand for the Company'sCompany’s products in thisthe land‑based gas turbines market is driven by the construction of cogeneration facilities such as base load for electric utilities or as backup sources to fossil fuel-firedfuel‑fired utilities during times of peak demand. Demand for the Company'sCompany’s alloys in the land-basedland‑based gas turbine markets has also been driven by concerns regarding lowering emissions from generating facilities powered by fossil fuels. Land-basedLand‑based gas turbine generating facilities have gained acceptance as clean, low-costlow‑cost alternatives to fossil fuel-firedfuel‑fired electric generating facilities. Land-basedLand‑based gas turbines are also used in power barges with mobility and as temporary base-load-generatingbase‑load‑generating units for countries that have numerous islands and a large coastline. Demand is also generated by mechanical drive units used for oil and gas production and pipeline transportation, as well as microturbines that are used as back up sources of power generation for hospitals and shopping malls.

Other Markets.  Other markets toin which the Company sells its HTA products and CRA products include flue-gas desulphurizationflue‑gas desulfurization (FGD), oil and gas, waste incineration, industrial heat treating, automotive, instrumentation, biopharmaceuticals, solar and nuclear fuel. The FGD market has been driven by both legislated and self-imposedself‑imposed standards for lowering emissions from fossil fuel-firedfuel‑fired electric generating facilities. This market is expected to soften in the U.S. if the trend to switch from coal to natural gas for power plants continues. The Company also sells its products for use in the oil and gas market, primarily in connection with sour gas production. In addition, incineration of municipal, biological, industrial and hazardous waste products typically produces very corrosive conditions that demand high-performancehigh‑performance alloys. The Company continues to look for opportunities to introduce and expand the use of its alloys in emerging technologies such as solar and nuclear fuel applications. Markets capable of providing growth are


Table of Contents

being driven by increasing performance, reliability and service life requirements for products used in these markets which could provide further applications for the Company'sCompany’s products.

Sales and Marketing and Distribution

The Company sells its products primarily through its direct sales organization, which operates from 1617 total locations in the U.S., Europe and Asia, 1314 of which are service and/or sales centers. All of the Company'sCompany’s service and/or sales centers are operated either directly by the Company or through its wholly-ownedwholly‑owned subsidiaries. Approximately 77% of the Company'sCompany’s net revenues in fiscal 20132015 were generated by the Company'sCompany’s direct sales organization. The remaining 23% of the Company'sCompany’s fiscal 20132015 net revenues was generated by a network of independent distributors and sales agents who supplement the Company'sCompany’s direct sales in the U.S., Europe and Asia, some of whom have been associated with the Company for over 30 years. Going forward, the Company expects its direct sales force to continue to generate approximately 80% of its total net revenues.

Providing technical assistance to customers is an important part of the Company'sCompany’s marketing strategy. The Company provides performance analyses of its products and those of its competitors for its customers. These analyses enable the Company to evaluate the performance of its products and to make recommendations as to the use of those products in appropriate applications, enabling the products to be included as part of the technical specifications used in the production of customers'customers’ products. The Company'sCompany’s market development professionals are assisted by its engineering and technology staff in directing the sales force to new opportunities. Management believes the Company'sCompany’s combination of

10


direct sales, technical marketing, engineering and customer support provides an advantage over other manufacturers in the high-performancehigh‑performance alloy industry. This activity allows the Company to obtain direct insight into customers'customers’ alloy needs and to develop proprietary alloys that provide solutions to customers'customers’ problems.

The Company continues to focus on growing its business in foreign markets. In recent years, the Company opened a service and sales center in China and sales centers in Singapore, India, Italy and Japan.

While the Company is making concentrated efforts to expand foreign sales, the majority of its revenue continues to be provided by sales to U.S. customers. The Company'sCompany’s domestic expansion effort includes, but is not limited to capital investment in increased capacity, the continued expansion of ancillary product forms, the continued development of new high-performancehigh‑performance alloys, the addition of equipment in U.S. service and sales centers to improve the Company'sCompany’s ability to provide a product closer to the form required by the customer and the continued effort, through the technical expertise of the Company, to find solutions to customer challenges.

The following table sets forth the approximate percentage of the Company'sCompany’s fiscal 20132015 net revenues generated through each of the Company'sCompany’s distribution channels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

From

    

From

    

 

 

 

Domestic

 

Foreign

 

 

 


 From
Domestic
Locations
 From
Foreign
Locations
 Total 

 

Locations

 

Locations

 

Total

 

Company mill direct/service and sales centers

 55% 22% 77%

 

55

%  

22

%  

77

%  

Independent distributors/sales agents

 22% 1% 23%

 

22

%  

1

%  

23

%  

       

Total

 77% 23% 100%

 

77

%  

23

%  

100

%  

       

 

The Company'sCompany’s top twenty customers accounted for approximately 38%34%, 36%34% and 34%40% of the Company'sCompany’s net revenues in fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. No customer or group of affiliated customers of the Company accounted for more than 10% of the Company'sCompany’s net revenues in fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 or 2013.2015.

Net revenues and net income in fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 20132015 were generated primarily by the Company'sCompany’s U.S. operations. Sales to domestic customers comprised approximately 64%56%, 60%57% and 56%59% of


Table of Contents

the Company'sCompany’s net revenues in fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. In addition, the majority of the Company'sCompany’s operating costs are incurred in the U.S., as all of its manufacturing facilities are located in the U.S. It is expected that net revenues and net income will continue to be highly dependent on the Company'sCompany’s domestic sales and manufacturing facilities in the U.S.

The Company'sCompany’s foreign and export sales were approximately $198.0$214.7 million, $233.0$193.8 million and $214.7$199.9 million for fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. Additional information concerning foreign operations and export sales is set forth in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

Manufacturing Process

        High-performanceHigh‑performance alloys require a lengthier, more complex production process and are more difficult to manufacture than lower-performancelower‑performance alloys, such as stainless steel. The alloying elements in high-performancehigh‑performance alloys must be highly refined during melting, and the manufacturing process must be tightly controlled to produce precise chemical properties. The resulting alloyed material is more difficult to process because, by design, it is more resistant to deformation. Consequently, high-performancehigh‑performance alloys require that a greater force be applied when hot or cold working and are less susceptible to reduction or thinning when rolling or forging. This results in more cycles of rolling, annealing and pickling compared to a lower-performancelower‑performance alloy to achieve proper dimensions. Certain alloys may undergo 40 or more distinct stages of melting, remelting, annealing, hot reduction, cold reduction, pickling and testing before they achieve the specifications required by a customer. This longer production cycle contributes to slower inventory turns. The Company manufactures its high-performancehigh‑performance alloys in various forms, including sheet, coil, plate, billet/ingot, tubular, wire and other forms. The Company also preforms value-addedperforms value‑added cutting services to supply certain customers with product cut to their specification.

At the Kokomo, Indiana facility, the manufacturing process begins with raw materials being combined, melted and refined in a precise manner to produce the chemical composition specified for each high-performancehigh‑performance alloy. The Company'sCompany’s primary melt facility utilizes two different melting processes. The argon oxygen decarburization process utilizes gas controls to remove carbon and other undesirable elements, thereby allowing more tightly-controlled tightly‑controlled

11


chemistries, which in turn produce more consistent properties in the high-performancehigh‑performance alloys. The other primary melt method utilizes vacuum induction melting which involves the melting of raw materials through electromagnetic induction while under vacuum conditions to produce the desired tightly-controlledtightly‑controlled chemistry. The control systems allow for statistical process control monitoring in real-timereal time to improve product quality. For most high-performancehigh‑performance alloys, this molten material is cast into electrodes and additionally refined through electroslag remelting. The resulting ingots are then forged or rolled to an intermediate shape and size depending upon the intended final product form. Intermediate shapes destined for flat products are then sent through a series of hot and cold rolling, annealing, pickling, stretching and picklingshearing operations before being cut to final size.

The Company has a four-highfour‑high Steckel rolling mill for use in hot rolling high-performancehigh‑performance alloys, created specifically for that purpose. The four-highfour‑high Steckel rolling mill was installed in 1982 and is one of the most powerful four-highfour‑high Steckel rolling mills in the world. The mill is capable of generating approximately 12.0 million pounds of separating force and rolling a plate up to 72 inches wide. The mill includes integrated computer controls (with automatic gauge control and programmed rolling schedules), two coiling Steckel furnaces and sixseven heating furnaces. Computer-controlledComputer‑controlled rolling schedules for each of the hundreds of combinations of product shapes and sizes the Company produces allow the mill to roll numerous widths and gauges to exact specifications without stoppages or changeovers.

The Company also operates a three-highthree‑high hot rolling mill and a two-hightwo‑high hot rolling mill, each of which is capable of custom processing much smaller quantities of material than the four-highfour‑high Steckel rolling mill. These mills provide the Company with significant flexibility in running smaller batches of varied products in response to customer requirements. The Company believes the flexibility provided by the three-highthree‑high and


Table of Contents

two-high two‑high mills provides the Company with an advantage over its major competitors in obtaining smaller specialty orders.

The Arcadia, Louisiana facility uses feedstock produced at the Kokomo facility to fabricate welded and seamless alloy pipe and tubing and purchases extruded tube hollows to produce seamless titanium tubing. The manufacturing processes at Arcadia require cold pilger mills, weld mills, draw benches, annealing furnaces and pickling facilities. The Company recently completed a capital investment project that added capacity in the above‑mentioned processes.

The Mountain Home, North Carolina facility primarily manufactures finished high-performancehigh‑performance alloy wire. Finished wire products are also warehoused at this facility.

Backlog

The Company defines backlog to include firm commitments from customers for delivery of product at established prices. Approximately 30% of the orders in the backlog at any given time include prices that are subject to adjustment based on changes in raw material costs. Historically, approximately 75% of the Company'sCompany’s backlog orders have shipped within six months and approximately 90% have shipped within 12 months. The backlog figures do not typically reflect that portion of the Company'sCompany’s business conducted at its service and sales centers on a spot or "just-in-time"“just‑in‑time” basis. For additional discussion of backlog, see Item 7. Management'sManagement��s Discussion and Analysis of Financial ConditionsCondition and Results of Operations contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.


Consolidated Backlog at Fiscal Quarter End

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 


  
 (in millions)
 

 

(in millions)

 

1st quarter

 $199.7 $110.4 $167.0 $261.8 $211.7 

    

$

167.0

    

$

261.8

    

$

211.7

    

$

180.2

    

$

215.5

 

2nd quarter

 153.0 124.6 241.7 264.2 207.0 

 

 

241.7

 

 

264.2

 

 

207.0

 

 

202.3

 

 

220.4

 

3rd quarter

 113.4 130.9 288.6 241.2 189.6 

 

 

288.6

 

 

241.2

 

 

189.6

 

 

204.7

 

 

192.9

 

4th quarter

 106.7 148.0 273.4 222.9 166.6 

 

 

273.4

 

 

222.9

 

 

166.6

 

 

221.3

 

 

185.8

 

Raw Materials

Raw materials represented 50%44% of cost of sales in fiscal 2013.2015. Nickel, a major component of many of the Company'sCompany’s products, accounted for approximately 60%55% of raw material costs, or approximately 30%24% of total cost of sales

12


in fiscal 2013.2015. Other raw materials include cobalt, chromium, molybdenum and tungsten. Melt materials consist of virgin raw material, purchased scrap and internally produced scrap.

The average nickel price per pound for cash buyers for the 30-day30‑day period ended on September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, as reported by the London Metals Exchange, was $9.25, $7.81$6.25, $8.20 and $6.25,$4.49 respectively. Prices for certain other raw materials which are significant in the manufacture of the Company'sCompany’s products, such as molybdenum and cobalt, and chromium, were also lower in fiscal 20132015 compared to fiscal 2014, while the price for chrome was higher in fiscal 2015 than in fiscal 2012.2014.

Although alternative sources of supply are available, the Company currently purchases nickel through an exclusive arrangement with a single supplier to ensure consistent quality and supply. The Company purchases raw materials through various arrangements including fixed-termfixed‑term contracts and spot purchases, which involve a variety of pricing mechanisms. In cases where the Company prices its products at the time of order placement, the Company attempts to establish selling prices with reference to known costs of materials, thereby reducing the risk associated with changes in the cost of raw materials. However, to the extent that the price of nickel fluctuates rapidly, there may be a favorable or unfavorable effect on the Company'sCompany’s gross profit margins. The Company periodically purchases material forward with certain suppliers.suppliers in connection with fixed price agreements with customers. In the event the Company enters into a forward purchase which is not matched to one or more customer contracts with fixed raw material prices or if a customer fails to meet the expected volume levels


Table of Contents

or the consumption schedule deviates from the expected schedule, a rapid or prolonged decrease in the price of raw materials could adversely affect the Company'sCompany’s operating results.

The Company values inventory utilizing the first-in, first-out ("FIFO"first‑in, first‑out (“FIFO”) inventory costing methodology. Under the FIFO inventory costing method, the cost of materials included in cost of sales may be different than the current market price at the time of sale of finished product due to the length of time from the acquisition of the raw material to the sale of the finished product. In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation method normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to last-in,last‑in, first out method. Conversely, in a period of rising raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation method normally results in lower costs of sales.

Research and Technical Support

The Company'sCompany’s technology facilities are located at the Kokomo headquarters and consist of 19,000 square feet of offices and laboratories, as well as an additional 90,000 square feet of paved storage area. The Company has six fully equipped technology testing laboratories, including a mechanical test lab, a metallographic lab, an electron microscopy lab, a corrosion lab, a high temperaturehigh-temperature lab and a welding lab. These facilities also contain a reduced scale, fully equipped melt shop and process lab. As of September 30, 2013,2015, the technology, engineering and technological testing staff consisted of 2625 persons, 12 of whom have engineering or science degrees, including 6 with doctoral degrees, with the majority of degrees in the field of metallurgical engineering or materials science.

Research and technical support costs primarily relate to efforts to develop new proprietary alloys and new applications for existing alloys. The Company spent approximately $3.3$3.5 million, $3.3$3.6 million and $3.5$3.6 million for research and technical support activities for fiscal 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively.

During fiscal 2013,2015, research and development projects were focused on new alloy development, new product form development, supportive data generation and new alloy concept validation, relating to products for the aerospace, land-basedland‑based gas turbine, chemical processing and oil and gas industries. In addition, significant projects were conducted to generate technical data in support of major market application opportunities in areas such as renewable energy, fuel cell systems, biotechnology (including toxic waste incineration and pharmaceutical manufacturing), and power generation.

Competition

The high-performancehigh‑performance alloy market is a highly competitive market in which eight to ten major producers participate in various product forms. The Company'sCompany’s primary competitors in flat rolled products include Special Metals Corporation, a subsidiary of Precision Cast Parts, Allegheny Technologies, Inc. and Outokumpu-VDM.VDM. The Company faces strong competition from domestic and foreign manufacturers of both high-performancehigh‑performance alloys (similar to those the Company produces) and other competing metals. The Company may face additional competition in the future to the extent new materials are developed, such as plastics or ceramics, that may be substituted for the Company'sCompany’s products. The Company

13


also believes that it will face increased competition from non-U.S.non‑U.S. entities in the next five to ten years, especially from competitors located in Eastern Europe and Asia. Additionally, in recent years the Company'sCompany’s domestic business has benefited frombeen challenged by a weakstrong U.S. dollar, which makes the goods of foreign competitors moreless expensive to import into the U.S. InU.S and makes the event thatCompany’s products more expensive to export outside the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen, the Company may face increased competition in the U.S. from foreign competitors.

        During fiscal 2013,In recent years, the Company experienced strong price competition from competitors who produce both stainless steel and high-performancehigh‑performance alloys due primarily to weakness in both markets.the stainless steel market. Increased competition has requiredrequires the Company to continually price its products competitively, which has contributed topressures the reduction in the Company'sCompany’s gross profit margin and net income.  When demand begins to improve, price competition in the high-performance alloy industry should begin to ease. The Company


Table of Contents

continues to respond to this competition by increasing emphasis on service centers, offering value-addedvalue‑added services, improving its cost structure and striving to improve delivery-timesdelivery times and reliability.

Employees

As of September 30, 2013,2015, the Company employed approximately 1,043 full-time1,147 full‑time employees worldwide. All eligible hourly employees at the Kokomo, Indiana and Arcadia, Louisiana plants, and the Lebanon, Indiana service center (approximately 593(594 in the aggregate) are covered by two collective bargaining agreements. Management believes that current relations with the union are satisfactory.

On December 21, 2012, the Company entered into a new collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America which covers eligible hourly employees at the Company'sCompany’s Arcadia, Louisiana plant. This agreement will expire in December 2015.

On July 1, 2013, the Company entered into a new five-year collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America, which will expire in June 2018. The agreement covers eligible hourly employees at the Kokomo, Indiana plant and the Lebanon, Indiana service center. This agreement will expire in June 2018.

Management believes that current relations with the union are satisfactory.

Environmental Matters

The Company'sCompany’s facilities and operations are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the environment and the storage, handling, use, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. In the U.S., such laws include, without limitation, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. As environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, it is likely the Company will be subject to increasingly stringent environmental standards in the future, particularly under air quality and water quality laws and standards related to climate change issues, such as a reporting of greenhouse gas emissions. Violations of these laws and regulations can result in the imposition of substantial penalties and can require facility improvements. Expenses related to environmental compliance were approximately $2.6$2.8 million for fiscal 20132015 and are currently expected to be approximately $2.9$2.5 million for fiscal 2014.2016. Although there can be no assurance, based upon current information available to the Company, the Company does not currently expect that costs of environmental contingencies, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. The Company'sCompany’s facilities are subject to periodic inspection by various regulatory authorities, who from time to time have issued findings of violations of governing laws, regulations and permits. In the past five years, the Company has paid administrative fines, none of which have had a material effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition, for alleged violations relating to environmental matters, requirements relating to its Title V Air Permit and alleged violations of record keeping and notification requirements relating to industrial waste water discharge. Capital expenditures of approximately $0.5 million were made for pollution control improvements during fiscal 2013,2015, with additional expenditures of approximately $1.0 million for similar improvements planned for fiscal 2014.2016.

The Company has received permits from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, or IDEM, to close and to provide post-closurepost‑closure monitoring and care for certain areas at the Kokomo facility previously used for the storage and disposal of wastes, some of which are classified as hazardous under applicable regulations. Closure certification was received in fiscal 1988 for the South Landfill at the Kokomo facility, and post-closurepost‑closure monitoring and

14


care are permitted and ongoing there. Closure certification was received in fiscal 1999 for the North Landfill at the Kokomo facility, and post-closurepost‑closure monitoring and care are permitted and ongoing there. In fiscal 2007, IDEM issued a single post-closurepost‑closure permit applicable to both the North and South Landfills, which contains monitoring and post-closurepost‑closure care requirements and whichrequirements.  That permit was reviewedrenewed in fiscal 2012. In addition, IDEM required that a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, Facility Investigation, or RFI, be conducted in order to further


Table of Contents

evaluate one additional area of concern and one additional solid waste management unit. The RFI commenced in fiscal 2008 and is ongoing. Based on preliminary results, theThe Company has determinedbelieves that some additional testing and further source remediation areis necessary.

The Company has also received permits from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, or NCDENR, to close and provide post-closurepost‑closure monitoring and care for the hazardous waste lagoon at its Mountain Home, North Carolina facility. The lagoon area has been closed and is currently undergoing post-closurepost‑closure monitoring and care.

The Company is required to monitor groundwater and to continue post-closurepost‑closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, the Company is aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater, and additional corrective action by the Company could be required.

The Company is unable to estimate the costs of any further corrective action at these sites, if required. Accordingly, the Company cannot assure that the costs of any future corrective action at these or any other current or former sites would not have a material effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Additionally, it is possible that the Company could be required to undertake other corrective action commitments for any other solid waste management unit or other conditions existing or determined to exist at its facilities. As a condition of the post-closurepost‑closure permits, the Company must provide and maintain assurances to IDEM and NCDENR of the Company'sCompany’s capability to satisfy post-closurepost‑closure groundwater monitoring requirements, including possible future corrective action as necessary. The Company provides these required assurances through a statutory financial assurance test as provided by Indiana and North Carolina law.

The Company may also incur liability for alleged environmental damages associated with the off-siteoff‑site transportation and disposal of hazardous substances. The Company'sCompany’s operations generate hazardous substances, and, while a large percentage of these substances are reclaimed or recycled, the Company also accumulates hazardous substances at each of its facilities for subsequent transportation and disposal off-siteoff‑site by third parties. Generators of hazardous substances which are transported to disposal sites where environmental problems are alleged to exist are subject to claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA, and state counterparts. CERCLA imposes strict, joint and several liabilities for investigatory and cleanup costs upon hazardous substance generators, site owners and operators and other potentially responsible parties. The Company is currently named as a potentially responsible party at one site. The Company may have generated hazardous substances disposed of at other sites potentially subject to CERCLA or equivalent state law remedial action. Thus, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be named as a potentially responsible party at other sites in the future or that the costs associated with those sites would not have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

On August 3, 2012, the Company received an information request from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, relating to the Company'sCompany’s compliance with laws relating to air quality. The Company has responded to the request, and there has been no further action by the EPA.


15


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the persons who served as executive officers of the Company as of September 30, 2013.2015. Except as indicated in the following paragraphs, the principal occupations of these persons have not changed during the past five years.

Name

Age

Position with Haynes International, Inc.

Mark M. Comerford

53
51

President and Chief Executive Officer; Director

Daniel W. Maudlin

49
47

Vice President—Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Venkat R. Ishwar

Janice W. Gunst

43
61

Vice President—Marketing & Technology
Marlin C. Losch53Vice President—Sales & Distribution
Jean C. Neel54Vice President—Corporate Affairs
Scott R. Pinkham46Vice President—Manufacturing
Gregory M. Spalding57Vice President—Tube & Wire Products
David S. Van Bibber42Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Janice C. Wilken41

Vice President—General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

Venkat R. Ishwar

63

Vice President—Marketing & Technology

Marlin C. Losch

55

Vice President—Sales & Distribution

Jean C. Neel

56

Vice President—Corporate Affairs

Scott R. Pinkham

48

Vice President—Manufacturing

Gregory M. Spalding

59

Vice President—Tube & Wire Products

David S. Van Bibber

44

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Jeffrey L. Young

58
56

Vice President & Chief Information Officer

 

Mr. Comerford was elected President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company in October 2008. Before joining the Company, Mr. Comerford was President of Brush International, Inc. and Brush Engineered Materials Alloys Division, each affiliated with Materion Corporation, formerly known as Brush Engineered Material, Inc., a company that manufactures high performance materials, from 2004 to 2008.

Mr. Maudlin has served as the Vice President-FinancePresident‑Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December 2012. Prior to that, he was Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company from September 2004 to December 2012.

Ms. Gunst has served as Vice President—General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company since August 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Gunst was a partner at Ice Miller LLP from 2005 to 2011.

Dr. Ishwar has served as Vice President—Marketing & Technology of the Company since January 2010. Dr. Ishwar was Senior Vice President of Forgital USA, a manufacturer of mechanical components, between July 2008 and December 2009. Prior to that, he was Director of Marketing and Business Development at the Company from 2005 to July 2008.

Mr. Losch has served as Vice President—Sales & Distribution of the Company since January 2010. Prior to that, he served as Vice President—North American Sales of the Company beginning in February 2006. Mr. Losch was Midwest Regional Manager of the Company from 2001 to 2006.

Ms. Neel has served as Vice President—Corporate Affairs of the Company since April 2000.

Mr. Pinkham has served as Vice President—Manufacturing of the Company since March 2008. Prior to that, he served as Vice President—Manufacturing Planning of the Company from 2004 to 2008.

Mr. Spalding has served as Vice President—Tube & Wire Products of the Company since May 2009. Prior to that, he served as Vice President, Haynes Wire & Chief Operating Officer of Haynes Wire from 2006 to May 2009, and Vice President—North American Sales since he joined the Company in July 1999.2009.

Mr. Van Bibber has served as Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company since December 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Van Bibber was Director of Finance at Belden, Inc. from 2009 to 2012 and Director of Finance at Zimmer, Inc. from 2006 to 2009.

        Ms. Wilken has served as Vice President—General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since August 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Wilken was a partner at Ice Miller LLP from 2005 to 2011.

Mr. Young has served as Vice President & Chief Information Officer of the Company since November 2005.


16


Table of Contents


Item 1A.  Risk Factors
Factor
s

Risks Related to Our Business

Our revenues may fluctuate widely based upon changes in demand for our customers'customers’ products.

Demand for our products is dependent upon and derived from the level of demand for the machinery, parts and equipment produced by our customers, which are principally manufacturers and fabricators of machinery, parts and equipment for highly specialized applications. Historically, certain of the markets in which we compete have experienced unpredictable, wide demand fluctuations. Because of the comparatively high level of fixed costs associated with our manufacturing processes, significant declines in those markets have had a disproportionately adverse impact on our operating results.

Since we became an independent company in 1987, we have, in several instances, experienced substantial year-to-yearyear‑to‑year declines in net revenues, primarily as a result of decreases in demand in the industries to which our products are sold. In fiscal 2002, 2003, 2009, 2010 and 2013, our net revenues, when compared to the immediately preceding year, declined by approximately 10.3%, 21.2%, 31.1%, 13.0% and 16.7%, respectively. We may experience similar fluctuations in our net revenues in the future. Additionally, demand is likely to continue to be subject to substantial year-to-yearyear‑to‑year fluctuations as a consequence of industry cyclicality, as well as other factors such as global economic uncertainty, and such fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.business.

Profitability in the high-performancehigh‑performance alloy industry is highly sensitive to changes in sales volumes.

The high-performancehigh‑performance alloy industry is characterized by high capital investment and high fixed costs. The cost of raw materials is the primary variable cost in the manufacture of our high-performancehigh‑performance alloys and, in fiscal 2013,2015, represented approximately 50.0%44% of our total cost of sales. Other manufacturing costs, such as labor, energy, maintenance and supplies, often thought of as variable, have a significant fixed element. Profitability is, therefore, very sensitive to changes in volume, and relatively small changes in volume can result in significant variations in earnings. Our ability to effectively utilize our manufacturing assets depends greatly upon continuing demand in our end-markets,end markets, successfully increasing our market share and continued acceptance of our new products into the marketplace. Any failure to effectively utilize our manufacturing assets may negatively impact our gross margin and net income.business.

We are subject to risks associated with global economic and political uncertainties.

We are susceptible to macroeconomic downturns in the United States and abroad that may affect the general economic climate and our performance and the demand of our customers. The continuing turmoil in the global economy has had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on our business and our financial condition. In addition to the impact that the global financial crisis has already had, we may face significant challenges if conditions in the global economy do not improve or if conditions worsen.

In addition, we are subject to various domestic and international risks and uncertainties, including changing social conditions and uncertainties relating to the current and future political climate. Changes in governmental policies (particularly those that would limit or reduce defense spending) could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and may reduce our customers'customers’ demand for our products and/or depress pricing of those products used in the defense industry or which have other military applications, resulting in a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of operations, revenues and cash flows. Furthermore, any actual armed hostilities and any future terrorist attacks in the U.S. or abroad could also have an adverse impact on the U.S. economy, global financial markets and our business. The effects may include, among other things, a decrease in demand in the aerospace industry due to reduced air travel, as well as reduced demand in the other industries we serve. Depending upon the severity, scope and duration of these effects, the impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flowsbusiness could be material.


Table of Contents

We operate in cyclical markets.

A significant portion of our revenues are derived from the highly cyclical aerospace, power generation and chemical processing markets. Our sales to the aerospace industry constituted 40.8%44.1% of our total sales in fiscal 2013.2015. Our land-based

17


Table of Contents

land‑based gas turbine and chemical processing sales constituted 21.2%15.3% and 25.7%22.9%, respectively, of our total sales in fiscal 2013.2015.

The commercial aerospace industry is historically driven by demand from commercial airlines for new aircraft. The U.S. and international commercial aviation industries continue to face challenges arising from the global economic climate, competitive pressures and fuel costs. Demand for commercial aircraft is influenced by industry profitability, trends in airline passenger traffic, the state of U.S. and world economies, the ability of aircraft purchasers to obtain required financing and numerous other factors, including the effects of terrorism and health and safety concerns. The military aerospace cycle is highly dependent on U.S. and foreign government funding; however, it is also driven by the effects of terrorism, a changing global political environment, U.S. foreign policy, the retirement of older aircraft and technological improvements to new engines that increase reliability. Accordingly, the timing, duration and severitymagnitude of cyclical upturns and downturns cannot be forecastforecasted with certainty. Downturns or reductions in demand for our products sold into the aerospace market could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The land-basedland‑based gas turbine market is also cyclical in nature. Demand for power generation products is global and is affected by the state of the U.S. and world economies, the availability of financing to power generation project sponsors and the political environments of numerous countries. The availability of fuels and related prices also have a large impact on demand. Reductions in demand for our products sold into the land-basedland‑based gas turbine industry may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We also sell products into the chemical processing industry, which is also cyclical in nature. Customer demand for our products in this market may fluctuate widely depending on U.S. and world economic conditions, the availability of financing, and the general economic strength of the end use customers in this market. Cyclical declines or sustained weakness in this market could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The competitive nature of our business results in pressure for price concessions to our customers and increased pressure to reduce our costs.

We are subject to substantial competition in all of the markets we serve, and we expect this competition to continue. As a result, we have made significant price concessions to our customers in the aerospace, chemical processing and power generation markets from time to time, and we expect customer pressure for further price concessions to continue. Maintenance of our market share will depend, in part, on our ability to sustain a cost structure that enables us to be cost‑competitive. If we are unable to adjust our costs relative to our pricing, our profitability will suffer. Our effectiveness in managing our cost structure will be a key determinant of future profitability and competitiveness.

Reductions in government expenditures or changes in spending priorities could adversely affect our military aerospace business.

The budget for the U.S. Department of Defense may be reduced from current levels. In addition to debt reduction efforts already authorized, it is possible that the U.S. government could reduce or further delay its spending on, or reprioritize its spending away from, the military aerospace industry. On November 23, 2011, the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (commonly referred to as the "Super Committee" which was established as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the "Budget Act")) failed to recommend legislation that would reduce net U.S. government spending by at least $1.2 trillion over the next 10 years, which failure to act triggered directed automatic across-the-board cuts, known as sequestrations, beginning on January 2, 2013. Then, on January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 ("ATRA") was signed into law. ATRA delayed the sequestrations created by the Budget Act for two months, until March 1, 2013. On March 1, 2013, with no deal reached, President Obama signed an order putting the sequestrations into effect. The sequestrations are automatic reductions of discretionary appropriations for U.S. defense programs, which would make up the shortfall necessary to achieve the $1.2 trillion target. On October 1, 2013, as

Sequestration remains a result of Congress's inability to enact legislation appropriating funds for fiscal year 2014, the U.S. government entered a shutdown. Then, on October 16, 2013, Congress agreed on a proposal to fund the government through January 15, 2014 at sequestration levelslong‑term concern, and suspend the debt limit until February 7, 2014. Ultimately, the U.S. government may be unable to timely complete its budget process or fully agree upon spending priorities and the U.S. government may be forced to enter another shutdown or further extend the sequestrations. While we are unable to predict the outcome of the


Tablefuture budget deliberations. Sequestration, or other budgetary cuts in lieu of Contents

budget deliberations, actions of Congress or the impact of any resulting reductions in defense appropriations, reductions in U.S. defense spending or changes in spending priorities, particularly with respect to the military aerospace industry,sequestration, could negatively affect our revenues, financial condition and results of operations.business.

Aerospace demand is primarily dependent on two manufacturers.

A significant portion of our aerospace products are sold to fabricators and are ultimately used in the production of new commercial aircraft. There are only two primary manufacturers of large commercial aircraft in the world, The Boeing Company and Airbus. A significant portion of our aerospace sales are dependent on the number of new aircraft built by these two manufacturers, which is in turn dependent on a number of factors over which we have little or no control. Those factors include demand for new aircraft from around the globe, success of new commercial and military aircraft programs and factors that impact manufacturing capabilities, such as the availability of raw materials and manufactured components, U.S. and world economic conditions, changes in the regulatory environment and labor relations between the

18


Table of Contents

aircraft manufacturers and their work forces. A significant interruption or slow downslowdown in the number of new aircraft built by the aircraft manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our operations are dependent on production levels at our Kokomo facility.

Our principal assets are located at our primary integrated production facility in Kokomo, Indiana and at our production facilities in Arcadia, Louisiana and in Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Arcadia and Mountain Home plants as well as all of the domestic and foreign service centers rely to a significant extent upon feedstock produced at the Kokomo facility. Any production failures, shutdowns or other significant problems at the Kokomo facility could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We maintain property damage insurance to provide for reconstruction of damaged equipment, as well as business interruption insurance to mitigate losses resulting from any production shutdown caused by an insured loss. Although we believe that our insurance is adequate to cover any such losses, that may not be the case. One or more significant uninsured losses at our Kokomo facility may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.business.

In addition, from time to time we schedule planned outages on the equipment at our Kokomo facility for maintenance and upgrades. These projects are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including a variety of market, operational and labor relatedlabor-related factors, many of which may be beyond our control. Should a planned shut-downshut down on a significant piece of equipment last substantially longer than originally planned, there could be a material adverse effect on our operating results.business.

Our production may be interrupted due to equipment failures or other events affecting our factories.

Our manufacturing processes depend on certain sophisticated and high‑value equipment, for which there may be only limited or no production alternatives and some of which has been in operation for a long period of time. Failures of this equipment could result in production delays, revenue loss and significant repair costs. In addition, our factories rely on the availability of electrical power and natural gas, transportation for raw materials and finished products and employee access to our workplace that are subject to interruption in the event of severe weather conditions or other natural or manmade events. While we maintain backup resources to the extent practicable, a severe or prolonged equipment outage, failure or other interruptive event affecting areas where we have significant manufacturing operations may result in loss of manufacturing or shipping days, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Natural or manmade events that interrupt significant manufacturing operations of our customers also could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A default under our agreements with Titanium Metals Corporation could require us to make significant payments and could disrupt our operations.

We are party to a Conversion Services Agreement and an Access and Security Agreement with Titanium Metals Corporation (TIMET) that provide for the performance of certain titanium conversion services through November 2026. TIMET was acquired by Precision Castparts Corp. which owns Special Metals Corporation, a direct competitor of ours. Events of default under the Conversion Services Agreement include (a) a change in control in which the successor does not assume the agreement, (b) a violation by the Company of certain non-competenon‑compete obligations relating to the manufacture and conversion of titanium and (c) failure to meet agreed-uponagreed‑upon delivery and quality requirements. If an event of default under the Conversion Services Agreement occurs, TIMET could require us to repay the unearned portion of the $50.0 million fee paid to us by TIMET when the agreement was signed, plus liquidated damages of $25.0 million. Our obligations to pay these amounts to TIMET are secured by a security interest in our four-highfour‑high Steckel rolling mill, through which we process a substantial amount of our products. In addition, the Access and Security Agreement with TIMET includes, among other terms, an access right that would allow TIMET to use certain of our operating assets, including the four-highfour‑high mill, to perform titanium conversion services in the event of our bankruptcy or the acceleration of our indebtedness. Exercise by


Table of Contents

TIMET of its rights under its security interest following a default and non-paymentnon‑payment of the amounts provided in the Conversion Services Agreement or exercise of the access rights under the Access and Security Agreement could cause significant disruption in our Kokomo operations which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and resultsbusiness.

19


Table of operations.Contents

During periods of lower demand in other alloy markets, some of our competitors may use their available capacity to produce higher volumes of high-performancehigh‑performance alloys, which leads to increased competition in the high-performancehigh‑performance alloy market.

We have experienced increased competition from competitors who produce both stainless steel and high-performancehigh‑performance alloys. Due to continued under-utilizationunder‑utilization of capacity in the stainless steel market, we believe these competitors increased their production levels and sales activity in high-performancehigh‑performance alloys to keep capacity in their mills as full as possible, while offering very competitive prices and delivery times. If the stainless market does not improve, continued competition from stainless steel producers could negatively impact our average selling price and reduce our gross profit margin.

In addition, as a result of the competition in our markets, we have made significant price concessions to our customers from time to time, and we expect customer pressure for further price concessions to continue. Maintenance of our market share will depend, in part, on our ability to sustain a cost structure that enables us to be cost-competitive.cost‑competitive. If we are unable to adjust our costs relative to our pricing, our profitability will suffer. Our effectiveness in managing our cost structure will be a key determinant of future profitability and competitiveness.

Periods of reduced demand and excess supply as well as the availability of substitute lower-cost materials can adversely affect our ability to price and sell our products at the profitability levels we require to be successful.

Additional worldwide capacity and reduced demand for our products could significantly impact future worldwide pricing which would adversely impact our business. In addition, continued availability of lower-cost, substitute materials may also cause significant fluctuations in future results as our customers opt for a lower-cost alternative.

We change prices on our products as we deem necessary. In addition to the above general competitive impact, other market conditions and various economic factors beyond our control can adversely affect the timing of our pricing actions. The effects of any pricing actions may be delayed due to long manufacturing lead times or the terms of existing contracts. There is no guarantee that the pricing actions we implement will be effective in maintaining our profit margin levels.

Rapid fluctuations in the price of nickel may materially adversely affect our operating results.business.

To the extent that we are unable to adjust to rapid fluctuations in the price of nickel, there may be a negative effect on our gross profit margins. In fiscal 2013,2015, nickel, a major component of many of our products, accounted for approximately 60%55% of our raw material costs, or approximately 30%24% of our total costscost of sales. We enter into several different types of sales contracts with our customers, some of which allow us to pass on increases in nickel prices to our customers. In other cases, we fix the nickel component of our prices for a period of time through the life of a long-termlong‑term contract. In yet other cases, we price our products at the time of order, which allows us to establish prices with reference to known costs of our nickel inventory, but which does not allow us to offset an unexpected rise in the price of nickel. We may not be able to successfully offset rapid increases in the price of nickel or other raw materials in the future. In the event that raw material price increases occur that we are unable to pass on to our customers, our cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Alternatively, our results of operations may also be negatively impacted if both customer demand and nickel prices rapidly fall at the same time. Because we value most of our inventory utilizing the first-in, first-outfirst‑in, first‑out inventory costing methodology, a rapid decrease in raw material costs has a negative effect on our operating results. In those circumstances, we recognize higher material cost in cost of sales relative to lower raw material market prices that drive the sales price.

In addition, we periodically enter into forward purchase agreements for our nickel supply. If we enter into a forward purchase agreement which is not matched to one or more customer contracts with fixed nickel prices, a rapid or prolonged decrease in the price of nickel could adversely impact our operating results.business.

Our business is dependent on a number of raw materials that are subject to volatility in price and availability.

We use a number of raw materials in our products which are found in only a few parts of the world and are available from a limited number of suppliers. The availability and costs of these materials may be influenced by private or

20


Table of Contents

government cartels, changes in world politics, additional regulation, labor relations between the materials producers and their work force, unstable governments in exporting nations, inflation, general


Table of Contents

economic conditions and export quotas imposed by governments in nations with rare earth element supplies. The ability of key material suppliers to meet quality and delivery requirements or to provide materials on price and other terms acceptable to us can also impact our ability to meet commitments to customers. Future shortages or price fluctuations in raw materials could result in decreased sales as well as margins, or otherwise adversely affect our business. The enactment of new or increased import duties on raw materials imported by us could also increase the costs to us of obtaining the raw materials and might adversely affect our business.

If suppliers increase the price of critical raw materials, we may not have alternative sources of supply. In some cases, we have entered into exclusive supply agreements with respect to raw materials, which could adversely affect our results of operationsbusiness if the exclusive supplier cannot meet quality and delivery requirements to provide materials on price and other terms acceptable to us. In addition, to the extent that we have quoted prices to customers and accepted customer orders for products prior to purchasing necessary raw materials, or have existing fixed-pricefixed‑price contracts, we may be unable to raise the price of products to cover all or part of the increased cost of the raw materials.

The manufacturemanufacturing of somethe majority of our products is a complex process and requires long lead times. As a result, weWe may experience delays or shortages in the supply of raw materials. If we are unable to obtain adequate and timely deliveries of required raw materials, we may be unable to timely manufacture sufficient quantities of products. This could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs, delay new product introductions or suffer harm to our reputation.

We value our inventory using the FIFO method, which could put pressure on our margins.

The cost of our inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Under the FIFO inventory costing method, the cost of materials included in cost of sales may be different than the current market price at the time of sale of finished product due to the length of time from the acquisition of raw material to the sale of the finished product.  In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first-out method.  This could result in compression of the gross margin on our product sales. 

Failure to successfully develop, commercialize, market and sell new applications and new products could adversely affect our business.

We believe that our proprietary alloys and metallurgical manufacturing expertise provide us with a competitive advantage over other high-performancehigh‑performance alloy producers. Our ability to maintain this competitive advantage depends on our ability to continue to offer products that have equal or better performance characteristics than competing products at competitive prices. Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to address the increasingly demanding needs of our customers by enhancing the properties of our existing alloys, by timely developing new applications for our existing products, and by timely developing, commercializing, marketing and selling new products. If we are not successful in these efforts, or if our new products and product enhancements do not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market acceptance, our revenues, cash flows and results of operationsbusiness could be negatively affected.

We are subject to risks relating to our cybersecurity measures.measures and to misappropriation of information generally.

We have put in place a number of systems, processes and practices designed to protect against intentional or unintentional misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operations. These include, for example, the appropriate encryption of information.network access. Despite such efforts, we are subject to breaches of security systems which may result in unauthorized access, misappropriation, corruption or disruption of the information we are trying to protect, in which case we could suffer material harm. Access to our proprietary information regarding new alloy formulations would allow our competitors to use that information in the development of competing products. Current employees have, and former employees may have, access to a significant amount of information regarding our operations which could be disclosed to our competitors or otherwise used to harm us. In addition, our systems could be subject to sabotage by employees or third parties, which could slow or stop production or otherwise adversely affect our operations.business. Any misappropriation or corruption of our systems and information or disruption of our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.


21


Table of Contents

An interruption in energy services may cause manufacturing curtailments or shutdowns.

We rely upon third parties for our supply of energy resources consumed in the manufacture of our products. The prices for and availability of electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions. These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control. Disruptions in the supply of energy resources could temporarily impair our ability to manufacture products for customers. Further, increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, has and may continue to adversely affect our profitability.business. To the extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.business.

We may be adversely affected by environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, costs and other liabilities.

We are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the environment, the storage, handling, use, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the health and safety of our employees. Under these laws and regulations, we may be held liable for all costs arising out of any release of hazardous substances on, under or from any of our current or former properties or any off-siteoff‑site location to which we sent or arranged to be sent wastes for disposal or treatment, and such costs may be material. We could also be held liable for any and all consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or other hazardous substances that may be attributable to our products or other environmental damage. In addition, some of these laws and regulations require our facilities to operate under permits that are subject to renewal or modification. These laws, regulations and permits can require expensive pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment. Violations of these laws, regulations or permits can also result in the imposition of substantial penalties, permit revocations and/or facility shutdowns.

We have received permits from the environmental regulatory authorities in Indiana and North Carolina to close and to provide post-closurepost‑closure monitoring and care for certain areas of our Kokomo and Mountain Home facilities that were used for the storage and disposal of wastes, some of which are classified as hazardous under applicable regulations. We are required to monitor groundwater and to continue post-closurepost‑closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, we are aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater and additional corrective action could be required. Additionally, it is possible that we could be required to undertake other corrective action for any other solid waste management unit or other conditions existing or determined to exist at our facilities. We are unable to estimate the costs of any further corrective action, if required. However, the costs of future corrective action at these or any other current or former sites could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.business.

We may also incur liability for alleged environmental damages associated with the off-siteoff‑site transportation and disposal of hazardous substances. Our operations generate hazardous substances, many of which we accumulate at our facilities for subsequent transportation and disposal off-site or recycling by third parties.parties off‑site. Generators of hazardous substances which are transported to disposal sites where environmental problems are alleged to exist are subject to liability under CERCLA and state counterparts. In addition, we may have generated hazardous substances disposed of at sites which are subject to CERCLA or equivalent state law remedial action. We have been named as a potentially responsible party at two sites.one site. CERCLA imposes strict, joint and several liabilities for investigatory and cleanup costs upon hazardous substance generators, site owners and operators and other potentially responsible parties regardless of fault. If we are named as a potentially responsible party at other sites in the future, the costs associated with those future sites could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.


Table of Contentsbusiness.

Environmental laws are complex, change frequently and have tended to become increasingly stringent over time. While we have budgeted for future capital and operating expenditures to comply with environmental laws, changes in any environmental law may increase our costs of compliance and liabilities arising from any past or future releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances and may materially adversely affect our business, resultsbusiness. See “Business—Environmental Matters.”

22


Table of operations or financial condition. See "Business—Environmental Matters."Contents

Pending legislation or regulation of greenhouse gases, if enacted or adopted in an onerous form, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Political and scientific debates related to the impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases on the global climate are prevalent. Regulation or some form of legislation aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions is currently being considered in the United States as well as globally. As a high-performancehigh‑performance alloy manufacturer, we will be affected, both directly and indirectly, if proposed climate change legislation, such as use of a "cap“cap and trade"trade” system, is enacted which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.business.

We are subject to increasing levels of federal regulation.Government regulation is increasing.

In recent years, the United States Congress has adopted several significant pieces of legislation, such as the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, that affect our operations.operation as well as those of other publicly traded companies. We may be subject to significant fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these laws or their implementing regulations, and the increasingly stringent regulations could require us to make additional unforeseen expenditures. Any such fines, penalties or expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.business.

New regulationsRegulations related to conflict minerals could adversely impact our business.

The Dodd‑Frank Act and related SEC has promulgated final rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act regardingrequire disclosure of the use of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, known as conflict minerals, in products manufactured by public companies. These new rules require due diligencea reasonable country of origin inquiry to determine whether such minerals originated from the Democratic Republic of Congo (the "DRC"“DRC”) or an adjoining country and, under some circumstances, whether such minerals helped finance the armed conflict in the DRC. The first conflictConflict minerals reportdisclosures are required by the new rules is due by May 31, 2014 and annually thereafter.to be filed annually. There will beare costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including costs to determine the origin of conflict minerals used in our products. There is also uncertainty relating to the requirements of the regulations as a result of ongoing litigation challenging the constitutionality of portions of the regulations. In addition, the implementation of these rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in our products. Also, we may face disqualification as a supplier for customers and reputational challenges if the due diligence procedures we implement do not enable us to verify the origins forsatisfy all conflict minerals or to determine that such minerals are DRC conflict-free.concerned stakeholders.

Our business is affected by federal rules, regulations and orders applicable to some of our customers who are government contractors.

A number of our products are manufactured and sold underto customers who are parties to U.S. government contracts or subcontracts. Consequently, we are directly and indirectly subject to various federal rules, regulations and orders applicable to government contractors. From time to time, we are also subject to government inquiries and investigations of our business practices due to our participation in government programs. These inquiries and investigations are costly and consuming of internal resources. Violations of applicable government rules and regulations could result in civil liability, in cancellation or suspension of existing contracts or in ineligibility for future contracts or subcontracts funded in whole or in part with federal funds, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Table of Contents

We could be required to make additional contributions to our defined benefit pension plans as a result of adverse changes in interest rates and the capital markets.

Our estimates of liabilities and expenses for pension benefits incorporate significant assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future estimated liability, the long-termlong‑term rate of return on plan assets and several assumptions relating to the employee workforce (salary increases, retirement age and mortality). We currently expect that we will be required to make future minimum contributions to our defined benefit pension plans. A decline in the value of plan investments in the future, an increase in costs or liabilities or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern pension plan funding could materially change the timing and amount of required pension funding. A requirement to fund any deficit created in the future could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.business.

23


Table of Contents

If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled and experienced personnel, our ability to effectively manage and expand our business will be harmed.

Our success largely depends on the skills, experience and efforts of our officers and other key employees who may terminate their employment at any time. The loss of any of our senior management team could harm our business. The announcement of the loss of one of our key employees could negatively affect our stock price. Our ability to retain our skilled workforce and our success in attracting and hiring new skilled employees will be a critical factor in determining whether we will be successful in the future. We face challenges in hiring, training, managing and retaining employees in certain areas including metallurgical researchers, equipment technicians and sales and marketing staff. If we are unable to recruit, hire and retain skilled employees, our new product and alloy development and commercialization could be delayed and our marketing and sales efforts could be hindered, which would adversely impact our competitiveness and financial results.business.

The risks inherent in our international operations may adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

We anticipate that we will continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from operations in international markets. As we continue to expand internationally, we will need to hire, train and retain qualified personnel for our direct sales efforts and retain distributors and train their personnel in countries where language, cultural or regulatory impediments may exist. Distributors, regulators or other government agencies may not continue to accept our products, services and business practices. In addition, we purchase raw materials on the international market. The sale and shipment of our products and services across international borders, as well as the purchase of raw materials from international sources, subject us to the trade regulations of various jurisdictions. Compliance with such regulations is costly. Any failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could impact us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our shipping, sales and service activities. Our international sales operations expose us and our representatives, agents and distributors to risks inherent in operating in foreign jurisdictions any one or more of which may adversely affect our business, and financial results, including:


·

our ability to obtain, and the costs associated with obtaining, U.S. export licenses and other required export or import licenses or approvals;

·

changes in duties and tariffs, taxes, trade restrictions, license obligations and other non‑tariff barriers to trade;

·

burdens of complying with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations;

·

business practices or laws favoring local companies;

·

fluctuations in foreign currencies;

·

restrictive trade policies of foreign governments;

·

longer payment cycles and difficulties collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;

·

difficulties in enforcing or defending agreements and intellectual property rights; and

·

foreign political or economic conditions.

Table of Contents

Any material decrease in our international revenues or inability to expand our international operations as a result of these or other factors would adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.business.

Export sales could present risks to our business.

Export sales account for a significant percentage of our revenues, and we believe this will continue to be the case in the future. Risks associated with export sales include: political and economic instability, including weak conditions in the world’s economies; accounts receivable collection; export controls; changes in legal and regulatory requirements;

24


Table of Contents

policy changes affecting the markets for our products; changes in tax laws and tariffs; trade duties; and exchange rate fluctuations (which may affect sales to international customers and the value of profits earned on export sales when converted into dollars). Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our business.

Although a collective bargaining agreement isagreements are in place for certain employees, union or labor disputes could still disrupt the manufacturing process.

Our operations rely heavily on our skilled employees. Any labor shortage, disruption or stoppage caused by any deterioration in employee relations or difficulties in the renegotiation of labor contracts could reduce our operating margins and income. Approximately 57%52% percent of our U.S. employees are affiliated with unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements. In fiscal 2013, the Company entered into two new collective bargaining agreements with the United Steel Workers of America which coverscover eligible hourly employees at the Company'sCompany’s Arcadia, Louisiana, Kokomo, Indiana and Lebanon, Indiana facilities. Failure to negotiate new labor agreements when required could result in a work stoppage at one or more of our facilities. Although we believe that our labor relations have generally been satisfactory, it is possible that we could become subject to additional work rules imposed by agreements with labor unions, or that work stoppages or other labor disturbances could occur in the future, any of which could reduce our operating margins and income and place us at a disadvantage relative to non-unionnon‑union competitors.

Product liability and product warranty risks could adversely affect our operating results.

We produce many critical products for commercial and military aircraft and for land-basedland‑based gas turbines. Failure of our products could give rise to substantial product liability and other damage claims. We maintain insurance addressing this risk, but there can be no assurance that the insurance coverage will be adequate or will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us.

Additionally, we manufacture our products to strict contractually-establishedcontractually‑established specifications using complex manufacturing processes. If we fail to meet the contractual requirements for a part,product, we may be subject to warranty costs to repair or replace the product itself and additional costs related to customers’ damages or the investigation and inspection of non-complyingnon‑complying products. These costs are generally not insured.

Our business subjects us to risk of litigation claims, as a routine matter, and this risk increases the potential for a loss that might not be covered by insurance.

Litigation claims may relate to the conduct of our business, including claims pertaining to product liability, commercial disputes, employment actions, employee benefits, compliance with domestic and federal laws and personal injury. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, we might not prevail on claims made against us in the lawsuits that we currently face, and additional claims may be made against us in the future. The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to us. The resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or resultsbusiness.

Our insurance may not provide enough coverage.

We maintain various forms of operations forinsurance, including insurance covering claims related to our properties and risks associated with our operations. Our existing property and liability insurance coverages contain exclusions and limitations on coverage. From time-to-time, in connection with renewals of insurance, we have experienced additional exclusions and limitations on coverage, larger self-insured retentions and deductibles and significantly higher premiums. As a result, in the future, our insurance coverage may not cover claims to the extent that period.


Tableit has in the past and the costs that we incur to procure insurance may increase significantly, either of Contentswhich could have an adverse effect on our business.

We depend on our Information Technology (IT) infrastructure to support the current and future information requirements of our operations.

Management relies on IT infrastructure, including hardware, network, software, people and process,processes, to provide useful information to support assessments and conclusions about operating performance. We are in the process of implementing an IT system change. If we do not successfully or timely implement the new system or it does not operate as envisioned, our business could be harmed. Our inability to produce relevant or reliable measures of operating performance in an efficient, cost-effectivecost‑effective and well-controlledwell‑controlled fashion may have significant negative impacts on our future operations.

25


Table of Contents

business.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

We rely on a combination of confidentiality, invention assignment and other types of agreements and trade secret, trademark and patent law to establish, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. Our efforts in regard to these measures may be inadequate, however, to prevent others from misappropriating our intellectual property rights. In addition, laws in some non-U.S. countries affecting intellectual property are uncertain in their application, which can affect the scope or enforceability of our intellectual property rights. Any of these events or factors could diminish or cause us to lose the competitive advantages associated with our intellectual property, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Any significant delay or problems in the expansion of our operations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are in the process of undertakinghave undertaken significant capital projects in order to enhance, expand and/or upgrade our facilities and operational capabilities. Our ability to achieve the anticipated increased revenues or otherwise realize acceptable returns on these investments or other strategic capital projects that we may undertake is subject to a number of risks, many of which are beyond our control, including the ability of management to ensure the necessary resources are in place to properly execute these projects on time and in accordance with planned costs, the ability of key suppliers to deliver the necessary equipment according to schedule and our ability to implement these projectprojects with minimal impactsimpact to our existing operations. In addition, the cost to implement any given strategic capital project ultimately may prove to be greater than originally anticipated. If we are not able to achieve the anticipated results from the implementation of any of our strategic capital projects, or if we incur unanticipated implementation costs or delays, our results of operations and financial positionbusiness may be materially adversely affected.

We consider acquisition, joint ventures and other business combination opportunities, as well as possible business unit dispositions, as part of our overall business strategy, which opportunities and dispositions involve uncertainties and potential risks that we cannot predict or anticipate fully.

We intend to continue to strategically position our businesses in order to improve our ability to compete. Strategies we employ to accomplish this may include seeking new or expanding existing specialty market niches for our products, expanding our global presence, acquiring businesses complementary to existing strengths and continually evaluating the performance and strategic fit of our existing business units. From time to time, management of the Company holds discussions with management of other companies to explore acquisitions, joint ventures, and other business combination opportunities as well as possible business unit dispositions. As a result, the relative makeup of our business is subject to change. Acquisitions, joint ventures and other business combinations involve various inherent risks, such as: assessing accurately the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent and other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition or other transaction candidates; the potential loss of key personnel of an acquired business; our ability to achieve identified financial and operating synergies anticipated to result from an acquisition or other transaction; and unanticipated changes in business and economic conditions affecting an acquisition or other transaction. International acquisitions could be affected by many factors, including, without limitation, export controls, exchange rate fluctuations, domestic and foreign political conditions and deterioration in domestic and foreign economic conditions.

A global recession or disruption in global financial markets could adversely affect us.

A global recession or disruption in the global financial markets presents risks and uncertainties that we cannot predict. During the recent recession, we saw a decline in demand for our products due to global economic conditions. During recessionary economic conditions or financial market disruptions, we face risks that may include:

declines26


Table of Contents

·

increases in corporate tax rates to finance government spending programs.

Political and social turmoil could adversely affect our business.

The war on terrorism, as well as political and social turmoil, could put pressure on economic conditions in revenuesthe United States and profitabilityworldwide. These political, social and economic conditions could make it difficult for us, our suppliers and our customers to forecast accurately and plan future business activities, and could adversely affect the financial condition of our suppliers and customers and affect customer decisions as to the amount and timing of purchases from reducedus. As a result, our business could be materially adversely affected.

The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets may not be recoverable.

Goodwill and other intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. We review these assets at least annually for impairment. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or delayed orders by our customers;

supply problems associated with any financial constraints faced by our suppliers;

restrictionsregulations and a variety of other factors. Any future impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our accessbusiness.

Healthcare legislation has and may continue to credit sources;

reductionsimpact our business.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively the “Acts”), signed into law in 2010, have increased our annual employee healthcare cost obligations and are expected to continue to increase our annual employee healthcare cost obligations going forward. We cannot predict the effect that this legislation, or any future state or federal healthcare legislation or regulation, will ultimately have on our business. However, depending on how and when all of the provisions of the Acts are implemented, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our working capital requirements may negatively affect our liquidity and capital resources.

Our working capital requirements can vary significantly, depending in part on the timing of our delivery obligations under various customer contracts and the payment terms with our customers and suppliers. If our working capital needs exceed our cash flows from operations, we would look to our banking group orcash balances and availability for borrowings under our existing credit facility to our committed credit availability due to combinations or failuressatisfy those needs, as well as potential sources of financial institutions;additional capital, which may not be available on satisfactory terms and

increases in corporate tax rates to finance government spending programs.
adequate amounts, if at all.

Risks Related to Shares of Our Common Stock

Our stock price is subject to fluctuations that may not be related to our performance as a result of being traded on a public exchange which may not be related to our performance.exchange.

The stock market can be highly volatile. The market price of our common stock is likely to be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their stock, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. The price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those listeddescribed elsewhere in this "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” section and others such as:those listed below:


·

fluctuations in the market price of nickel, raw materials or energy;

·

market conditions in the end markets into which our customers sell their products, principally aerospace, power generation and chemical processing;

·

announcements of technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;

·

the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to us;

·

announcements by us of acquisitions, alliances, joint development efforts or corporate partnerships in the high‑temperature resistant alloy and corrosion‑resistant alloy markets;

·

market conditions in the technology, manufacturing or other growth sectors; and

27


Table of Contents

·

rumors relating to us or our competitors.

Payment of dividends will depend on our future financial condition and performance.

Although our Board of Directors currently intends to continue the payment of regular quarterly cash dividends on shares of our common stock, the timing and amount of future dividends will depend on the Board'sBoard’s assessment of our operations, financial condition, projected liabilities, our compliance with contractual restrictions in our credit agreement, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to declare dividends at the same or similar rates.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-lawsby‑laws could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could deter or prevent a change in control.

Some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws,by‑laws, as well as Delaware statutes, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control. These provisions, including those regulating the nomination of directors, may make it more difficult for other persons, without the approval of our Board of Directors, to launch takeover attempts that a stockholder might consider to be in his or her best interest. These provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments
Comment
s

There are no unresolved comments by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2.  Properties
Propertie
s

Manufacturing Facilities.  The Company owns manufacturing facilities in the following locations:

·

Kokomo, Indiana—manufactures and sells all product forms, other than tubular and wire goods;

·

Arcadia, Louisiana—manufactures and sells welded and seamless tubular goods; and

·

Mountain Home, North Carolina—manufactures and sells high‑performance alloy wire.

The Kokomo plant, the Company'sCompany’s primary production facility, is located on approximately 180 acres of industrial property and includes over 1.0 million square feet of building space. There are three sites consisting of (1) a headquarters and research laboratory; (2) primary and secondary melting, annealing furnaces, forge press and several smaller hot mills; and (3) the Company's four-highCompany’s four‑high Steckel rolling mill and sheet product cold working equipment, including twoone cold strip mills.mill and two bright anneal furnaces. All alloys and product forms other than tubular and wire goods are produced in Kokomo.

The Arcadia plant is located on approximately 42 acres of land, and includes 202,500 square feet of buildings on a single site. Arcadia uses feedstock produced in Kokomo to fabricate welded and seamless high-performance alloy pipe and tubing and purchases extruded tube hollows to produce seamless titanium tubing.


Table of Contents

Manufacturing processes at Arcadia require cold pilger mills, weld mills, draw benches, annealing furnaces and pickling facilities.

The Mountain Home plant is located on approximately 29 acres of land, and includes approximately 100,000 square feet of building space. The Mountain Home facility is primarily used to manufacture finished high-performancehigh‑performance alloy wire. Finished wire products are also warehoused at this facility.

The owned facilities located in the United States are subject to a mortgage which secures the Company'sCompany’s obligations under its U.S. revolving credit facility with a group of lenders led by Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC. For more information, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

Service and Sales Centers.  The service and sales centers, which stock and sell all product forms, contain equipment capable of precision laser and water jet processing services to cut and shape products to customers'customers’ precise specifications.  The Company owns service and sales centers in the following locations:

Openshaw, England28

Lenzburg, Switzerland


 

Table of Contents

The Openshaw plant, located near Manchester, England, consists of approximately 75 acres of land and over 200,00085,000 square feet of buildings on a single site.

In addition, the Company leases service and sales centers, which stock and sell all product forms, in the following locations:

·

La Mirada, California

·

Houston, Texas

·

Lebanon, Indiana

·

Shanghai, China

·

Windsor, Connecticut

Sales Centers.  The Company leases sales centers, which sell all product forms, in the following locations:

·

Paris, France

·

Zurich, Switzerland

·

Singapore

·

Milan, Italy

·

Chennai, India

·

Tokyo, Japan

On January 1, 2015, the company entered into a capital lease agreement for the building that houses the assets and operations of LaPorte Custom Metal Processing (LCMP).  The capital asset and obligation are recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments.  The asset is included in Property, plant and equipment, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is depreciated over the 20 year lease term.  The long term component of the capital lease obligation is included in Long term obligations  (See Note 18. Capital Lease Obligation).

 

All owned and leased service and sales centers not described in detail above are single site locations and are less than 100,000 square feet. The Company is modifying its facilities to meet its current and future business needs. The Company plans to spend approximately $24$7 million over the course of fiscal 20142016 and 20152017 to restructure, consolidate and enhance capabilities at its service center operations.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
Proceeding
s

The Company is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations. Future developments and increasingly stringent regulations could require the Company to make additional unforeseen expenditures for these matters. The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a


Table of Contents

plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations. Such litigation includes, without limitations, federal and state EEOC administrative and judicial actions, litigation of commercial matters and litigation and administrative actions relating to environmental matters. For more information, see "Item“Item 1. Business—Environmental Matters." Litigation and administrative actions may result in substantial costs and may divert management'smanagement’s attention and resources, and the level of future expenditures for legal matters cannot be determined with any degree of certainty. Nonetheless, based on the facts presently known, management does not expect expenditures for pending legal proceedings to have a material effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company is currently, and has in the past been, subject to claims involving personal injuries allegedly relating to its products.products or processes. For example, the Company is presently involved in two actions involving welding rod-relatedrod‑related injuries, which were filed in California state court against numerous manufacturers, including the Company, in May 2006 and February 2007, respectively, alleging that the welding-relatedwelding‑related products of the defendant manufacturers harmed the

29


Table of Contents

users of such products through the inhalation of welding fumes containing manganese. The Company is also involved in three actions alleging that asbestos at the facilities of the defendant manufactures harmed the plaintiffs who worked in the facilities. The Company believes that it has defenses to these allegations and that, if the Company were found liable, the cases would not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
Disclosure
s

Not Applicable.applicable.


30


Table of Contents

Part II


Part II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Securities
.

The Company'sCompany’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market ("NASDAQ"(“NASDAQ”) and traded under the symbol "HAYN"“HAYN”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for the Company'sCompany’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ.NASDAQ as well as dividends declared.

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2013:
 High Low Dividend 

September 30, 2013

 $49.47 $44.23 $0.22 

June 30, 2013

 $54.95 $45.93 $0.22 

March 31, 2013

 $55.94 $50.00 $0.22 

December 31, 2012

 $54.13 $46.35 $0.22 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2012:

          

September 30, 2012

 
$

57.50
 
$

45.77
 
$

0.22
 

June 30, 2012

 $64.61 $46.00 $0.22 

March 31, 2012

 $65.47 $56.16 $0.22 

December 31, 2011

 $63.67 $39.90 $0.22 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

High

    

Low

    

Dividend

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended September 30, 2015

 

$

50.04

 

$

35.38

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended June 30, 2015

 

$

51.70

 

$

42.47

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended March 31, 2015

 

$

47.84

 

$

38.68

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended December 31, 2014

 

$

49.10

 

$

40.22

 

$

0.22

 

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended September 30, 2014

 

$

57.99

 

$

45.99

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended June 30, 2014

 

$

59.14

 

$

50.81

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended March 31, 2014

 

$

54.40

 

$

49.29

 

$

0.22

 

Quarter ended December 31, 2013

 

$

55.24

 

$

45.88

 

$

0.22

 

 

The range of the Company'sCompany’s closing common stock price on NASDAQ from October 1, 20122014 to September 30, 20132015 was $44.23$35.38 to $55.94.$59.70. The closing price of the common stock was $45.25$37.84 on September 30, 2013.2015.

As of November 1, 2013,2015, there were approximately 4448 holders of record of the Company'sCompany’s common stock.

Payment of dividends is permitted under the Company'sCompany’s existing financing agreement, although the U.S. revolving credit facility requires (i) prior notice to the agent, (ii) a fixed charge coverage ratio average for the previous twelve months which must be not less than 1.0 to 1.0, (applicable only for dividends greater than $20.0 million in any fiscal year) and (iii) that the Company have at least $18.0 million in availability, after payment, on the date the dividend payment is made. While it is the Company'sCompany’s intention to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends for fiscal 20142016 and beyond, any decision to pay future cash dividends will be made by the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings, financial condition and other factors.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table provides information as of September 30, 2013 regarding shares of the Company's common stock issuable pursuant to its stock option and restricted stock plans:

Plan Category
 Number of
securities to
be issued upon
exercise
of outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities
remaining available
for future
issuance under
equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in the
second column)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

  291,664 $45.36  481,228(2)

(1)
For a description of the Company's equity compensation plans, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

(2)
Includes (i) options to purchase 237,478 shares of common stock and (ii) 243,750 shares of restricted stock.

Table of Contents

Cumulative Total Stockholder Return

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company'sCompany’s common stock to the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index, S&P MidCap 400 Index, and Peer Group for each of the last five fiscal years ended September 30. The cumulative total return assumes an investment of $100 on September 30, 20082010 and the reinvestment of any dividends during the period. The Russell 2000 is a broad-basedbroad‑based index that includes smaller market capitalization stocks. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is the most widely used index for mid-sizedmid‑sized companies. Management believes that the S&P MidCap 400 is representative of companies with similar market and economic characteristics to Haynes. Furthermore, we also believe the Russell 2000 Index is representative of the Company'sCompany’s current market capitalization status and this index is also provided on a comparable basis. The companies included in the Peer Group Index are: Allegheny Technologies, Inc., RTI International Metals, Inc., Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., A. M. Castle & Co. and Carpenter Technology Corp. Management believes that the companies included in the Peer Group, taken as a whole, provide a meaningful comparison in terms of competition, product offerings and other relevant factors. The total stockholder return for the peer group is weighted according to the respective issuer'sissuer’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period.

31


Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Among Haynes, The Russell 2000 Index, The S&P MidCap 400

Index and our Peer Group


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

    

2010

    

2011

    

2012

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Haynes International, Inc.

 100.00 67.95 74.57 94.29 114.98 101.62 

 

100.00

 

126.43

 

154.21

 

136.24

 

140.84

 

118.25

 

Russell 2000

 100.00 88.92 100.81 97.24 128.25 166.77 

 

100.00

 

96.47

 

127.25

 

165.50

 

172.01

 

174.15

 

S&P MidCap 400

 100.00 95.01 111.91 110.48 141.99 181.29 

 

100.00

 

98.72

 

126.90

 

162.02

 

181.17

 

183.70

 

Peer Group

 100.00 95.41 129.27 118.42 118.72 128.02 

 

100.00

 

93.78

 

93.78

 

98.55

 

97.23

 

47.35

 

Table of Contents

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
Dat
a

This information should be read in conjunction with "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

32


Table of Contents

Amounts below are in thousands, except backlog, which is in millions, share and per share information and average nickel price.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Statement of Operations Data:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Net revenues

 

$

542,896

 

$

579,561

 

$

482,746

 

$

455,410

 

$

487,635

 

Cost of sales

 

 

449,116

 

 

458,721

 

 

409,120

 

 

408,112

 

 

393,971

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

41,215

 

 

40,661

 

 

38,165

 

 

38,693

 

 

42,572

 

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,259

 

 

3,285

 

 

3,505

 

 

3,556

 

 

3,598

 

Operating income

 

 

49,306

 

 

76,894

 

 

31,956

 

 

5,049

 

 

47,494

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

 

(92)

 

 

(101)

 

 

(42)

 

 

(71)

 

 

318

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

18,270

 

 

26,813

 

 

10,421

 

 

1,369

 

 

16,690

 

Net income

 

$

31,128

 

$

50,182

 

$

21,577

 

$

3,751

 

$

30,486

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.55

 

$

4.09

 

$

1.75

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

Diluted

 

$

2.54

 

$

4.07

 

$

1.74

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.80

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,067,555

 

 

12,147,179

 

 

12,223,838

 

 

12,291,881

 

 

12,331,805

 

Diluted

 

 

12,149,866

 

 

12,216,031

 

 

12,265,630

 

 

12,321,700

 

 

12,344,209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Balance Sheet Data:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Working capital

 

$

318,761

 

$

350,032

 

$

347,210

 

$

322,591

 

$

332,015

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

110,678

 

 

124,652

 

 

152,764

 

 

174,083

 

 

185,351

 

Total assets

 

 

596,569

 

 

626,926

 

 

597,582

 

 

610,771

 

 

638,191

 

Total debt

 

 

1,348

 

 

980

 

 

767

 

 

745

 

 

4,574

 

Long-term portion of debt

 

 

1,348

 

 

980

 

 

767

 

 

745

 

 

4,574

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits(1)

 

 

215,432

 

 

236,552

 

 

167,177

 

 

177,797

 

 

217,837

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

272,853

 

 

301,098

 

 

355,803

 

 

346,730

 

 

341,989

 

Cash dividends paid

 

 

9,758

 

 

10,803

 

 

10,849

 

 

10,906

 

 

10,952

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2011

    

2012

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Consolidated Backlog at Fiscal Quarter End(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st quarter

 

$

167.0

 

$

261.8

 

$

211.7

 

$

180.2

 

$

215.5

 

2nd quarter

 

 

241.7

 

 

264.2

 

 

207.0

 

 

202.3

 

 

220.4

 

3rd quarter

 

 

288.6

 

 

241.2

 

 

189.6

 

 

204.7

 

 

192.9

 

4th quarter

 

 

273.4

 

 

222.9

 

 

166.6

 

 

221.3

 

 

185.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Average nickel price per pound(3)

    

$

9.25

    

$

7.81

    

$

6.25

    

$

8.20

    

$

4.49

 


(1)

Significant increases in the pension and postretirement benefits liability occurred in fiscal 2012 primarily due to reductions in the discount rate used to value the future liability and in fiscal 2015 primarily related to a change to a new mortality table. This has been reflected actuarially as an increase in the Pension and Postretirement Benefits Liability and an increase in the accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss account. On a prospective basis, if interest rates were to rise, this would cause a decrease in the liability and accumulated other comprehensive loss. Prior to fiscal 2009, many actions were taken to reduce this liability such as: i) effective second quarter of fiscal 2007, capping the Company’s contributions to the retiree health care costs at $5,000 annually (resulting in a $46,300 liability reduction), ii) effective first quarter of fiscal 2008, freezing the pension benefit accruals for all non‑union employees in the U.S. (resulting in an $8,191 liability reduction), and iii) closing the pension plans to new entrants for both non‑union employees (effective 12/31/2005) and union employees (effective 6/30/2007).

33

 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Statement of Operations Data:

                

Net revenues

 $438,633 $381,543 $542,896 $579,561 $482,746 

Cost of sales

  416,150  327,712  449,116  458,721  409,120 

Selling, general and administrative expense

  36,207  35,470  41,215  40,661  38,165 

Research and technical expense

  3,120  2,828  3,259  3,285  3,505 

Impairment of goodwill(1)

  43,737         

Operating income (loss)

  (60,581) 15,533  49,306  76,894  31,956 

Interest expense (income), net

  509  (59) (92) (101) (42)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

  (8,768) 6,717  18,270  26,813  10,421 
            

Net income (loss)

 $(52,322)$8,875 $31,128 $50,182 $21,577 

Net income (loss) per share:

                

Basic

 $(4.36)$0.74 $2.55 $4.09 $1.75 

Diluted

 $(4.36)$0.73 $2.54 $4.07 $1.74 

Dividends declared per common share

 $0.00 $0.80 $0.80 $0.88 $0.88 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                

Basic

  12,004,498  12,049,779  12,067,555  12,147,179  12,223,838 

Diluted

  12,004,498  12,159,529  12,149,866  12,216,031  12,265,630 

 

 
 September 30, 
 
 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Working capital

 $307,091 $300,199 $318,761 $350,032 $347,210 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  105,820  107,043  110,678  124,652  152,764 

Total assets

  544,150  551,543  596,569  626,926  597,582 

Total debt

  1,592  1,433  1,348  980  767 

Long-term portion of debt

  1,482  1,324  1,348  980  767 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits(2)

  181,077  193,560  215,432  236,552  167,177 

Stockholders' equity

  278,799  265,849  272,853  301,098  355,803 

Cash dividends paid

    9,707  9,758  10,803  10,849 


 
 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Consolidated Backlog at Fiscal Quarter End(3):

                

1st quarter

 $199.7 $110.4 $167.0 $261.8 $211.7 

2nd quarter

  153.0  124.6  241.7  264.2  207.0 

3rd quarter

  113.4  130.9  288.6  241.2  189.6 

4th quarter

  106.7  148.0  273.4  222.9  166.6 


 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Average nickel price per pound(4)

 $7.93 $10.26 $9.25 $7.81 $6.25 

(1)
A non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $43.7 million was recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

(2)
Significant increases in the pension and postretirement benefits liability occurred in fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 primarily due to reductions in the discount rate used to value the future liability. This has been reflected actuarially as an increase in the Pension and Postretirement Benefits Liability and an increase in the accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss account. In fiscal 2013, the discount rate increased, causing a reduction in the

Table of Contents

    liability. On a prospective basis, if interest rates were to continue to rise, this would cause a decrease in the liability and accumulated other comprehensive loss. Prior to fiscal 2009, many actions were taken to reduce this liability such as: i) effective second quarter of fiscal 2007, capping the Company's contributions to the retiree health care costs at $5,000 annually (resulting in a $46,300 liability reduction), ii) effective first quarter of fiscal 2008, freezing the pension benefit accruals for all non-union employees in the U.S. (resulting in an $8,191 liability reduction), and iii) closing the pension plans to new entrants for both non-union employees (effective 12/31/2005) and union employees (effective 6/30/2007).

(3)
The Company defines backlog to include firm commitments from customers for delivery of product at established prices. Approximately 30% of the orders in the backlog at any given time include prices that are subject to adjustment based on changes in raw material costs. Historically, approximately 75% of the backlog orders have shipped within six months and approximately 90% have shipped within 12 months. The backlog figures do not typically reflect that portion of the business conducted at service and sales centers on a spot or "just-in-time" basis.

(4)
Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

(2)

The Company defines backlog to include firm commitments from customers for delivery of product at established prices. Approximately 30% of the orders in the backlog at any given time include prices that are subject to adjustment based on changes in raw material costs. Historically, approximately 75% of the backlog orders have shipped within six months and approximately 90% have shipped within 12 months. The backlog figures do not typically reflect that portion of the business conducted at service and sales centers on a spot or “just‑in‑time” basis.

(3)

Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Operation
s

 

Please refer to page 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for a cautionary statement regarding forward-lookingforward‑looking information.

Overview of Business

The Company is one of the world'sworld’s largest producers of high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloys in flat product form, such as sheet, coil and plate forms.plate. The Company is focused on developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing technologically advanced, high-performancehigh‑performance alloys, which are used primarily in the aerospace, chemical processing and land-basedland‑based gas turbine industries. The global specialty alloy market consists of three primary sectors: stainless steel, general purpose nickel alloys and high-performance nickel-high‑performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloys. The Company competes primarily in the high-performance nickel-high‑ performance nickel‑ and cobalt-basedcobalt‑based alloy sector, which includes high-temperaturehigh‑ temperature resistant alloys, or HTA products, and corrosion-resistantcorrosion‑resistant alloys, or CRA products. The Company believes it is one of the principal producers of high-performancehigh‑performance alloy flat products in sheet, coil and plate forms. The Company also produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars and in bar, billet and wire forms.

The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Arcadia, Louisiana; and Mountain Home, North Carolina. The Kokomo facility specializes in flat products, the Arcadia facility specializes in tubular products and the Mountain Home facility specializes in high-performance wire products. The Company distributes its products primarily through its direct sales organization, which includes 1314 service and/or sales centers in the United States, Europe and Asia. All of these centers are Company-operated.


Table of ContentsCompany‑operated.

Overview of Markets

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 Amount % of
Total
 

Net Revenues
(dollars in millions)

                               

Aerospace

 $160.0  36.5%$138.4  36.3%$203.5  37.5%$229.9  39.7%$197.1  40.8%

Chemical processing

  109.7  25.0  87.7  23.0  150.0  27.6  134.6  23.2  124.1  25.7 

Land-based gas turbines

  97.7  22.3  74.2  19.4  98.2  18.1  119.2  20.5  102.0  21.2 

Other markets

  59.4  13.5  68.1  17.8  76.7  14.1  81.6  14.1  48.9  10.1 
                      

Total product

  426.8  97.3  368.4  96.5  528.4  97.3  565.3  97.5  472.1  97.8 

Other revenue(1)

  11.8  2.7  13.1  3.5  14.5  2.7  14.3  2.5  10.6  2.2 
                      

Net revenues

 $438.6  100.0%$381.5  100.0%$542.9  100.0%$579.6  100.0%$482.7  100.0%
                      

U.S. 

 $258.9  59.0%$231.6  60.7%$344.9  63.5%$346.7  59.8%$268.0  55.5%

Foreign

 $179.7  41.0%$149.9  39.3%$198.0  36.5%$232.9  40.2%$214.7  44.5%

Shipments by Market (millions of pounds)

                               

Aerospace

  5.9  32.2% 6.0  33.7% 8.1  34.3% 8.9  38.1% 8.1  38.5%

Chemical processing

  4.5  24.5  4.2  23.6  7.0  29.7  5.3  22.6  5.2  24.8 

Land-based gas turbines

  5.5  29.6  4.6  25.8  5.5  23.3  6.5  27.8  6.1  29.1 

Other markets

  2.5  13.7  3.0  16.9  3.0  12.7  2.7  11.5  1.6  7.6 
                      

Total Shipments

  18.5  100.0% 17.8  100.0% 23.6  100.0% 23.4  100.0% 21.0  100.0%
                      

Average Selling Price Per Pound

                               

Aerospace

 $26.90    $23.16    $25.07    $25.73    $24.31    

Chemical processing

  24.20     20.84     21.53     25.49     23.79    

Land-based gas turbines

  17.88     16.15     17.71     18.28     16.66    

Other markets

  23.39     22.37     25.56     30.78     30.69    

Total product(2)

  23.09     20.67     22.36     24.17     22.44    

Total average selling price

  23.73     21.41     22.97     24.78     22.94    

34


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Amount

 

Total

 

Net Revenues

    

 

    

    

    

    

 

    

    

    

    

 

    

    

    

    

 

    

    

    

    

 

    

    

    

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

203.5

 

37.5

%  

$

229.9

 

39.7

%  

$

197.1

 

40.8

%  

$

195.2

 

42.9

%  

$

215.1

 

44.1

%  

Chemical processing

 

 

150

 

27.6

 

 

134.6

 

23.2

 

 

124.1

 

25.7

 

 

113.4

 

24.9

 

 

111.6

 

22.9

 

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

98.2

 

18.1

 

 

119.2

 

20.5

 

 

102.0

 

21.2

 

 

86.7

 

19.0

 

 

74.4

 

15.3

 

Other markets

 

 

76.7

 

14.1

 

 

81.6

 

14.1

 

 

48.9

 

10.1

 

 

44.4

 

9.8

 

 

59.8

 

12.2

 

Total product

 

 

528.4

 

97.3

 

 

565.3

 

97.5

 

 

472.1

 

97.8

 

 

439.7

 

96.6

 

 

460.9

 

94.5

 

Other revenue(1)

 

 

14.5

 

2.7

 

 

14.3

 

2.5

 

 

10.6

 

2.2

 

 

15.7

 

3.4

 

 

26.7

 

5.5

 

Net revenues

 

$

542.9

 

100.0

%  

$

579.6

 

100.0

%  

$

482.7

 

100.0

%  

$

455.4

 

100.0

%  

$

487.6

 

100.0

%  

U.S.

 

$

344.9

 

63.5

%  

$

346.7

 

59.8

%  

$

268.0

 

55.5

%  

$

261.6

 

57.4

%  

$

287.7

 

59.0

%  

Foreign

 

$

198.0

 

36.5

%  

$

232.9

 

40.2

%  

$

214.7

 

44.5

%  

$

193.8

 

42.6

%  

$

199.9

 

41.0

%  

Shipments by Market (millions of pounds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

8.1

 

34.3

%  

 

8.9

 

38.1

%  

 

8.1

 

38.5

%  

 

8.8

 

40.7

%  

 

9.2

 

45.3

%  

Chemical processing

 

 

7.0

 

29.7

 

 

5.3

 

22.6

 

 

5.2

 

24.8

 

 

5.2

 

24.2

 

 

4.3

 

21.2

 

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

5.5

 

23.3

 

 

6.5

 

27.8

 

 

6.1

 

29.1

 

 

5.9

 

27.2

 

 

4.7

 

23.2

 

Other markets

 

 

3.0

 

12.7

 

 

2.7

 

11.5

 

 

1.6

 

7.6

 

 

1.7

 

7.9

 

 

2.1

 

10.3

 

Total Shipments

 

 

23.6

 

100

%  

 

23.4

 

100

%  

 

21.0

 

100

%  

 

21.7

 

100

%  

 

20.3

 

100.0

%  

Average Selling Price Per Pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

25.07

 

 

 

$

25.73

 

 

 

$

24.31

 

 

 

$

22.10

 

 

 

$

23.27

 

 

 

Chemical processing

 

 

21.53

 

 

 

 

25.49

 

 

 

 

23.79

 

 

 

 

21.63

 

 

 

 

25.97

 

 

 

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

17.71

 

 

 

 

18.28

 

 

 

 

16.66

 

 

 

 

14.74

 

 

 

 

15.99

 

 

 

Other markets

 

 

25.56

 

 

 

 

30.78

 

 

 

 

30.69

 

 

 

 

26.11

 

 

 

 

28.98

 

 

 

Total product(2)

 

 

22.36

 

 

 

 

24.17

 

 

 

 

22.44

 

 

 

 

20.30

 

 

 

 

22.75

 

 

 

Total average selling price

 

 

22.97

 

 

 

 

24.78

 

 

 

 

22.94

 

 

 

 

21.02

 

 

 

 

24.07

 

 

 


(1)

Other revenue consists of toll conversion, royalty income, scrap sales and revenue recognized from the TIMET agreement (see Note 15 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Other revenue does not have associated shipment pounds.

(1)
Other revenue consists of toll conversion, royalty income, scrap sales and revenue recognized from the TIMET agreement (see Note 15 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(2)
Total product price per pound excludes "Other Revenue".

(2)

Total product price per pound excludes “Other Revenue”.

Aerospace sales forimproved over fiscal 2015 after decreasing in fiscal 2013 decreased from fiscal 2012, which was the Company's best year for aerospace sales volume. Throughoutand 2014.  The declines in fiscal 2013 and 2014 were due to aerospace demand wasbeing negatively impacted by customer destocking within the supply-chain and by falling raw material market prices which caused customers to delay ordering.supply chain. This period of low demand is considered temporary, but is expectedbegan to persist throughrecover in the early portionlatter half of fiscal 2014.2014, and the recovery continued into fiscal 2015. Demand for aerospace products is expected to begin to increase commensurateincreasing in line with the forecasted increase in commercial aircraft builds. Both Boeing and Airbus have reported sizeable backlog increases along with forecasted increases in production schedules and continued emphasis on accelerating production. Demand for more fuel-efficientfuel‑efficient engines with fewer emissions is driving new engine builds. Management also anticipates that the maintenance, repair and overhaul business will continue at a steady to increasing pace due to required maintenance schedules for the rising number of engines in use year-over-year.year‑over‑year.

Sales to the chemical processing industry decreased year-over-year.have declined over fiscal 2013, 2014 and 2015. The project-orientedproject‑oriented nature of this market can create inconsistent sales levels. Sales to this market in fiscal 2015 included some high-value special application projects with high average selling price per pound, but overall volumes were lower in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year. Demand for large project large-volume, project‑based orders has been at relatively low levels during fiscal 20122013, 2014 and 2013.2015. The main driver of demand in this market is capital expenditure spending in the chemical processing sector driven by end end‑user demand for housing, automotive, energy and agricultural products. The chemical processing market is sensitive to fiscal policies as well as world economic conditions and GDP growth. IncreasedPotential for increased sales to the chemical processing industry in fiscal 20142016 will be dependent on improvement in global spending in the chemical processing sector. An additional driver of demand in this market is the increase in North American production of natural gas liquids and the further downstream processing of those chemicals that may utilize equipment that requires high-performancehigh‑performance alloys.


Table of Contents

Sales to the land-basedland‑based gas turbine market peaked in fiscal 2012 and have decreased over fiscal 2013, decreased compared to2014 and 2015. However, fiscal 2012 which wasand 2013 were two of the Company'sCompany’s best yearyears for land-basedland‑based gas turbine sales volume. Subject to global economic conditions, management believes that long-termlong‑term demand in this market will improveincrease due to

35


Table of Contents

higher activity in power generation oil and gas production and alternative power systems. Land-basedLand‑based gas turbines are favored in electric generating facilities due to low capital cost at installation, fewer emissions than the traditional fossil fuel-firedfuel‑fired facilities and favorable domestic natural gas prices provided by availability of unconventional (shale) gas supplies. As governmental policy shifts away from coal-firedcoal‑fired facilities, demand for land-basedland‑based gas turbines is expected to increase.

Sales into the other markets category decreasedincreased in fiscal 2015 after decreasing in fiscal 2013 comparedand 2014. Sales to fiscal 2012 partly due to a shipment of an oil and gas project orderthis market in fiscal 2012 which did not repeat in fiscal 2013.2015 included some high-value special application projects with high average selling price per pound.  The industries in this category focus on upgrading overall product quality, improving product performance through increased efficiency, prolonging product life and lowering long-termlong‑term costs. Companies in these industries are looking to achieve these goals through the use of "advanced materials"“advanced materials” which supports the increased use of high-performancehigh‑performance alloys in an expanding number of applications. In addition to supporting and expanding the traditional businesses of oil and gas, flue-gas desulphurization,flue‑gas desulfurization in China, automotive and heat treating, the Company expects increased levels of activity overall in non-traditionalnon‑traditional markets such as fuel cells and silicon feed-stock productionalternative energy applications.

Acquisition

On January 7, 2015, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Leveltek Processing, LLC located in LaPorte, Indiana for $14.6 million in cash.  The acquisition of the LaPorte assets provides the Company control of a significant portion of the sheet stretching, leveling, slitting and cut-to-length operations that were previously an outsourced function. Acquisition costs incurred were not significant. The acquired business is being operated by LaPorte Custom Metals Processing, LLC (LCMP), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The goodwill recognized in connection with the Leveltek-LaPorte assets consists of the value associated with the addition of the stretching and leveling capabilities as well as increased capacity in slitting and cut-to-length operations to meet customer demand.  The complementary capabilities are expected to lead to operating cost synergies as well as expand the Company’s commercial offerings.

Summary of Capital Spending

        In fiscal 2012, the Company began to increase the amount of capital spending from historical levels in order to increase capacity commensurate with the anticipated expansion of the markets the Company services over the intermediate and long-term and also to improve customer service in the form of accelerated delivery times and expanded value-added products and services. Even though the markets in which the Company participates are currently experiencing a period of lower demand, management continues to believe in the long-term growth potential of the aerospace, land-based gas turbine and chemical processing markets. Therefore, the Company is continuing to implement its strategy regarding the previously announcedThe Company’s strategic capital investment projects that were announced in line with plans to meet the expected long-term growth requirements of those target markets.

        In fiscal 2012 the Company announced plans to invest approximately $61.0 million at twohave been completed and resulted in expansions of its U.S. manufacturing facilities. This includes plans to invest approximately $37.0 million to expand by an estimated 60% the specialty titaniumflat product capacity in Kokomo, Indiana and high-performance nickel alloy tubular production capacity in Arcadia, Louisiana.  These investments have already begun contributing to profitability, and management expects continued benefits as utilization ramps up on this new capacity, particularly in aerospace tubing. The Company had a record level of its Arcadia, Louisiana facility. In addition,production for sheet and coil products in fiscal 2015. While the project spend was substantially incurred in prior years, approximately $3.3 million of this project spend occurred in fiscal 2015.

The Company is also implementing a global information technology system. This upgrade is expected to provide the Company plans to invest approximately $24.0 million to expand bywith an estimated 20% itsintegrated global system, enhanced analytical capability and improved capabilities in capacity to produce specialty high-performance alloy flat products at the Company's Kokomo, Indiana facility. Both of these projects have commenced,planning, inventory management and are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2014. These capital investments in Arcadia and Kokomo are expected to improve the Company's ability to service its customers' increasing demand for specialty products and also continue to improve product quality, improve operating efficiencies and enhance working capital management for all of the Company's products produced at these locations.

        The Company also previously announced plans to upgrade the Company's information systems so that all the Company's locations will be on a global centralized information technology system.customer service. To date, the Company has spent $8.0$12.8 million on the project and expects to spend approximately $3.0$1.7 million in fiscal 20142016 for a total project spend of approximately $11.0$14.5 million. The system is currently in use at the U.S. and European service centers whileand has been implemented in the Company expects the domestic services centers to be completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2014.U.S. for general ledger, accounts payable and receivable, purchasing and sales.   The systems upgrade for the main manufacturing operating system is expected to be completedimplemented during the third quarterfirst and second quarters of fiscal 2014. In addition2016.

While the acquisition of the LaPorte operations of Leveltek has expanded the Company’s service center capabilities to enhanced analysis capability,include stretching, slitting and cut-to-length operations, the Company expects this system to lead to improvements in capacity planning, cost analysis and reduction, inventory management and customer service.


Table of Contents

        The Company'soverall evaluation of itsthe Company’s global service center and distribution function continues. The evaluation has included an analysis of the equipment required, the number and geographic locations of these service centers, the services provided and the cost structure, with the objective of enhancing the distribution organization. The Company is pursuing the purchase of coil processing capability with stretch levelingorganization and cut-to-length capability. The enhanced capabilities are expected to result in increased revenue, enhancement of working capital management and a reduced cost structure, which is expected to improve return on assets at the service centers. Spending on the service and distribution center projects is estimated at approximately $24.0 million throughout fiscal 2014 and 2015 and includes additional cutting equipment such as laser and water jet cutting equipment.capabilities.

Capital spending and acquisitions in fiscal 20132015 was $41.6 million. The$33.1 million, and the forecast for capital spending in fiscal 20142016 is approximately $57.0$35.0 million. The $57.0$35.0 million of planned capital spending includes $19.0$16.6 million to increase sheet manufacturing capacity in the Kokomo operations which is expected to help the Company to keep pace with the anticipated growth in the aerospace market.  During fiscal 2015, the Company was capacity constrained on sheet production and hit record sheet/coil production levels.  The Company expects increasing demand for thin gauge flat products primarily associated with the aerospace market. In order to respond to this expected demand, planned capital spending for fiscal 2016 includes investments in the heat treating area as well as the cold rolling area.  The remaining $18.4 million of planned spending is earmarked for the tubular capacity expansion, $14.0 million forcompletion of the processing and service center upgrades, $7.0 million formanufacturing phase of the Kokomo flat product project, $3.0 million for the informationIT systems upgrade project

36


Table of Contents

($1.7 million) and continued upgrades throughout our manufacturing facilities ($16.7 million) which is considered a maintenance level of spending.

Volumes, Competition and Pricing

Business conditions improved in the remaining $14.0 million for additional enhancementsfirst half of fiscal 2015 but became increasingly challenging in the third and upgradesfourth quarters of the current facilities and equipment. The processing and service center project capital spend are expected to carry over into fiscal 2015 with approximately $10.0 million of spend in that year.

        The actualfalling nickel prices and planned capital investments of approximately $124.0 million over the three year-period of fiscal 2012 through 2014 are expectedcontinued headwinds related to allow the Company to increase capacity, enhance product quality, reduce costsforeign currency and improve working capital management. These significant investments are necessitated by expected intermediate and long-term increasing customerlower oil & gas demand for volume and quality improvements.

Dividends Declared

        On November 21, 2013, the Company announced that the Board of Directors declaredcreating a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company's common stock. The dividend is payable December 16, 2013 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 2, 2013. The aggregate cash payout based on current shares outstanding will be approximately $2.7 million, or approximately $10.8 million on an annualized basis.

Gross Profit Margin Trend Performance

        The following tables show net revenue, gross profit margin and gross profit margin percentage for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013.

 
 Trend of Gross Profit Margin and
Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2012
 
 
 Quarter Ended 
(dollars in thousands)
 December 31,
2011
 March 31,
2012
 June 30,
2012
 September 30,
2012
 

Net Revenues

 $128,851 $158,882 $141,574 $150,254 

Gross Profit Margin

 $23,491 $34,535 $32,389 $30,425 

Gross Profit Margin %

  18.2% 21.7% 22.9% 20.2%


 
 Trend of Gross Profit Margin and
Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2013
 
 
 Quarter Ended 
(dollars in thousands)
 December 31,
2012
 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2013
 September 30,
2013
 

Net Revenues

 $114,300 $129,201 $123,587 $115,658 

Gross Profit Margin

 $18,774 $20,084 $18,605 $16,163 

Gross Profit Margin %

  16.4% 15.5% 15.1% 14.0%

Table of Contents

        The gross profit margin percentage decreased during each quarter of fiscal 2013. The quarter-to-quarter compression is primarily due to lower average selling prices resulting from price competition in the marketplace and the impact of declining raw material prices on demand as well as higher-cost inventory charged to cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin and gross profit margin percentage for fiscal 2013 were also impacted by the effect of a fixed pricing agreement with the Company's nickel supplier pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase a portion of its nickel supply at a fixed price that has been and may continue to be greater than the market price of nickel. The impact of the contract on the Company's gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year was 0.4 percentage points. While not material to the fiscal year results, the contract had a greater impact as the market price of nickel continued to drop through the second half of fiscal 2013. In the fourth quarter, the Company entered into an amendment with the supplier that allowed the Company to purchase lower volumes of the higher-priced nickel but extended the duration of the purchase commitment through fiscal 2015 in order to minimize the near term impact and provide a longer period in which the market price of nickel could increase. If the market price of nickel remains low and sales volumes do not increase, thespillover impact on the Company'sCompany’s chemical processing business.  Overall volume in fiscal 2015 of 20.3 million pounds was lower as compared to fiscal 2014.  However, favorable product mix due to the specialty application projects that included proprietary alloys favorably impacted the Company’s average selling price per pound and contributed to higher gross profit margin percentage is expected to be unfavorable in future periods as a resultpercentage of net revenues.  These specialty application projects provided an offset to the sluggishness in the highly competitive commodity-based side of the fixed price contract, which impact is estimated at approximately 1.0 percentage point, or higher, ifchemical processing market in fiscal 2015. Last year, the market price of nickel declines further.

Volumes, Competition and Pricing

        The Company continues to experience reduced demand, reduced selling price due to nickel market prices and increased price competition in the marketplace relative to fiscal 2012, particularly in commodity-type alloys in mill-direct project business. The intense competitive environment continues to requirein that business required the Company to aggressively price orders, across all markets, which has unfavorably impactedimpacting the Company'sCompany’s gross profit margin and net income. In addition, sales volumes below mill capacities in the industry have reduced mill-direct lead times for our products. The decline in mill-direct lead times has, in turn, resulted in downward pressure on prices for service center transactional business, which typically commands a higher price due to faster product availability.

        In addition to the negative effects of price competition, volumesincome in fiscal 2013 are lower than those2014. These circumstances contributed to an average selling price improvement for product sales of $2.45 per pound sold in fiscal 2012. Management believes the reduction in volume in the aerospace and land-based gas turbine markets is attributable to destocking in the supply chain as customers consume excess inventory. Volume reductions in the chemical processing2015, a 12.1% improvement over fiscal 2014.1

The market are primarily attributable to lower large project releases. The year-to-year reduction in volume in the "other" markets is due to a large tubular oil and gas project produced and shipped in fiscal 2012 that did not repeat in fiscal 2013. Management believes the decline in the price of nickel and customer uncertainty regardinghas been declining dramatically. The average price as reported by the strength ofLondon Metals Exchange for the economy have also been contributors30 days ending September 30, 2015 was $4.49 per pound which is a 45% decline to the decline in overall volumes.

        Decliningsame period at the end of fiscal 2014 of $8.20 per pound. Falling nickel prices can cause customerscreate compression on gross margins due to delay orders for the Company's products because the Company generally passes thepressure on selling prices from lower nickel prices, combined with higher cost of sales as we sell off the higher cost inventory acquired in a prior period with higher nickel on to customersprices.  This compression occurred in the price of its products. As nickel prices decline, customers may delay ordering in orderthird and fourth quarter and will likely continue to receive a lower price in the future. The reduced volumes processed through the mill have resulted in reduced absorption of fixed costs and additional margin compression. The Company has implemented cost reduction measures and continues to carefully review discretionary spending in order to mitigate thenegatively impact of these factors on gross margin.margins into fiscal 2016.

 

The Company values inventory utilizing the first-in, first-out ("FIFO"(“FIFO”) inventory costing methodology. Under the FIFO inventory costing method, the cost of materials included in cost of sales may be different than the current market price at the time of sale of finished product due to the length of time from the acquisition of the raw material to the sale of the finished product. In a period of decreasing raw material costs, the FIFO inventory valuation normally results in higher costs of sales as compared to the last-in, first out method.  Conversely,In addition, falling nickel can cause customers to delay orders for the Company’s products in order to receive a periodlower price in the future. 

Gross Profit Margin Trend Performance

The following tables show net revenue, gross profit margin and gross profit margin percentage for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trend of Gross Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2014

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 

$

93,700

 

$

115,350

 

$

126,293

 

$

120,067

Gross Profit Margin

 

 

5,250

 

 

9,064

 

 

14,061

 

 

18,923

Gross Profit Margin %

 

 

5.6%

 

 

7.9%

 

 

11.1%

 

 

15.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trend of Gross Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin Percentage for Fiscal 2015

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 

$

110,676

 

$

138,688

 

$

121,270

 

$

117,001

Gross Profit Margin

 

 

20,271

 

$

27,837

 

$

24,151

 

$

21,405

Gross Profit Margin %

 

 

18.3%

 

 

20.1%

 

 

19.9%

 

 

18.3%

1

Average selling price per pound for product sales differs from aggregate selling price per pound, as reported in previous filings, due to the exclusion of other revenue not associated with pounds shipped. As an example, revenue generated from LCMP from toll conversion is not included in calculating average selling price per pound for product sales.

During the third and fourth quarters of rising raw material costs,fiscal 2015, gross margin slightly declined sequentially but still represented a recovery from the FIFO inventory valuation normally resultsprior year. Gross margin was 18.3% in lower coststhe fourth quarter of sales.fiscal 2015 compared to a 15.8% gross


37


Table of Contents

margin percentage in the same period last year.  As mentioned above, a stronger mix of high-value specialty and proprietary alloys in high-value product forms contributed to this improvement. The compression in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2015 primarily relates to falling nickel prices.

Working Capital

Controllable working capital, which includes accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses, was $273.4$277.5 million at September 30, 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $37.8$6.2 million or 12.1%2.3% from $311.2$271.3 million at September 30, 2012.2014. This decreaseincrease of $37.8$6.2 million includes a reductiondecrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9.2 million and an increase in accounts receivable of $3.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in inventory of $31.1 million due to careful attention to reducing melting and production schedules to match customer demand.$6.2 million.

GuidanceDividends Declared

        First quarter results are typically impacted by lower production days due to holidays and planned maintenance outages. Planned outages related to the capital expansion projects in both Kokomo and Arcadia as well as other extended maintenance-related projects are expected to impact first quarter results. In addition,On November 19, 2015, the Company has continuedannounced that the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The dividend is payable December 15, 2015 to see order entry, pricing and backlog decline with lower demand, which resulted in managing inventories down.stockholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 2015. The Company remains committed to preparing for the anticipated long-term growth opportunities in its core markets. However, in the short term, management expects revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 toaggregate cash payout based on current shares outstanding will be lower than revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and, the Company expects to incur a net loss in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.approximately $2.7 million, or approximately $11.0 million on an annualized basis.

Backlog

Set forth below is selected data relating to the Company'sCompany’s backlog, the 30-day30‑day average nickel price per pound as reported by the London Metals Exchange, as well as a breakdown of net revenues, shipmentspounds shipped and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown. TheseThis data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the remainder of the "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 


 Quarter Ended Quarter Ended 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 


 December 31,
2011
 March 31,
2012
 June 30,
2012
 September 30,
2012
 December 31,
2012
 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2013
 September 30,
2013
 

  

2013

  

2014

  

2014

  

2014

  

2014

  

2015

  

2015

  

2015

 

Backlog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

Dollars (in thousands)

 $261,811 $264,245 $241,151 $222,870 $211,726 $206,994 $189,628 $166,589 

 

$

180,150

 

$

202,283

 

$

204,680

 

$

221,322

 

$

215,529

 

$

220,406

 

$

192,894

 

$

185,784

 

Pounds (in thousands)

 8,547 8,853 7,951 6,866 6,905 7,362 6,185 5,371 

 

 

5,875

 

 

7,520

 

 

8,240

 

 

7,835

 

 

8,032

 

 

7,335

 

 

6,492

 

 

6,598

 

Average selling price per pound

 $30.63 $29.85 $30.33 $32.46 $30.66 $28.12 $30.66 $31.02 

 

$

30.66

 

$

26.90

 

$

24.84

 

$

28.25

 

$

26.83

 

$

30.05

 

$

29.71

 

$

28.16

 

Average nickel price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

London Metals Exchange(1)

 $8.23 $8.49 $7.50 $7.81 $7.90 $7.59 $6.47 $6.25 

 

$

6.31

 

$

7.10

 

$

8.42

 

$

8.20

 

$

7.22

 

$

6.23

 

$

5.80

 

$

4.49

 


(1)
Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

(1)

Represents the average price for a cash buyer as reported by the London Metals Exchange for the 30 days ending on the last day of the period presented.

Backlog was $166.6$185.8 million at September 30, 2013,2015, a decrease of approximately $23.0$7.1 million, or 12.1%3.7%, from $189.6$192.9 million at June 30, 2013.2015. The backlog dollars decreased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 due to a 5.2% decrease in backlog average selling price partially offset by a 1.6% increase in backlog pounds.

On a year-to-dateyear‑to‑date basis, the backlog has declineddecreased by $56.3$35.5 million, or 25.3% primarily16.1%, from $221.3 million at September 30, 2014. The backlog dollars decreased during fiscal 2015 due to a 1.5 million pound reduction15.8% decrease in backlog pounds. The reductionpounds combined with a 0.3% decrease in backlog average selling price.

Management believes that the decline in the backlog duringis due to the continued shipping of some major projects in fiscal year resulted from2015 and reduced order entry activity, as compared to sales, in each quarterlevels over the past few quarters driven presumably by the falling price of fiscal 2013. Backlog for aerospace, land-based gas turbinenickel, impacting both volume and other markets declined in fiscal 2013. Backlog for the chemical processing market remained flat at a low level.average selling price per pound. 

        Management believes that destocking continues in the supply chain causing lower order entry volumes. Management also believes that customers continue to exercise caution in making purchases due to the decreasing cost of nickel. The effect of these factors was greater in the aerospace and land-based gas turbine markets than in its other markets in fiscal 2013. The Company's pounds shipped to the aerospace and land-based gas turbine markets in fiscal 2012 represented a record level of shipments.


38


Table of Contents

Quarterly Market Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

December 31, 

 

March 31, 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

    

2013

 

2014

 

2014

 

2014

 

2014

 

2015

 

2015

 

2015

Net revenues (in thousands)

 

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

 

    

Aerospace

 

$

39,951

 

$

47,257

 

$

54,177

 

$

53,776

 

$

43,255

 

$

60,320

 

$

56,484

 

$

55,003

Chemical processing

 

 

23,073

 

 

30,436

 

 

30,570

 

 

29,330

 

 

30,753

 

 

35,575

 

 

24,159

 

 

21,112

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

18,145

 

 

21,756

 

 

24,989

 

 

21,853

 

 

17,533

 

 

19,858

 

 

17,616

 

 

19,449

Other markets

 

 

9,403

 

 

11,389

 

 

12,626

 

 

10,993

 

 

14,100

 

 

16,566

 

 

14,496

 

 

14,632

Total product revenue

 

 

90,572

 

 

110,838

 

 

122,362

 

 

115,952

 

 

105,641

 

 

132,319

 

 

112,755

 

 

110,196

Other revenue

 

 

3,128

 

 

4,512

 

 

3,931

 

 

4,115

 

 

5,035

 

 

6,369

 

 

8,515

 

 

6,805

Net revenues

 

$

93,700

 

$

115,350

 

$

126,293

 

$

120,067

 

$

110,676

 

$

138,688

 

$

121,270

 

$

117,001

Shipments by markets (in thousands of pounds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

1,630

 

 

2,226

 

 

2,577

 

 

2,399

 

 

1,809

 

 

2,687

 

 

2,439

 

 

2,308

Chemical processing

 

 

1,121

 

 

1,528

 

 

1,369

 

 

1,224

 

 

1,182

 

 

1,351

 

 

852

 

 

913

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

1,206

 

 

1,515

 

 

1,641

 

 

1,524

 

 

1,084

 

 

1,218

 

 

1,028

 

 

1,327

Other markets

 

 

362

 

 

423

 

 

470

 

 

446

 

 

447

 

 

680

 

 

466

 

 

470

Total shipments

 

 

4,319

 

 

5,692

 

 

6,057

 

 

5,593

 

 

4,522

 

 

5,936

 

 

4,785

 

 

5,018

Average selling price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

24.51

 

$

21.23

 

$

21.02

 

$

22.42

 

$

23.91

 

$

22.45

 

$

23.16

 

$

23.83

Chemical processing

 

 

20.58

 

 

19.92

 

 

22.33

 

 

23.96

 

 

26.02

 

 

26.33

 

 

28.36

 

 

23.12

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

15.05

 

 

14.36

 

 

15.23

 

 

14.34

 

 

16.17

 

 

16.30

 

 

17.14

 

 

14.66

Other markets

 

 

25.98

 

 

26.92

 

 

26.86

 

 

24.65

 

 

31.54

 

 

24.36

 

 

31.11

 

 

31.13

Total average selling price (product only; excluding other revenue)

 

 

20.97

 

 

19.47

 

 

20.20

 

 

20.73

 

 

23.36

 

 

22.29

 

 

23.56

 

 

21.96

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 

 

21.69

 

 

20.27

 

 

20.85

 

 

21.47

 

 

24.48

 

 

23.36

 

 

25.34

 

 

23.32

39

 
 Quarter Ended Quarter Ended 
 
 December 31,
2011
 March 31,
2012
 June 30, 2012 September 30,
2012
 December 31,
2012
 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2013
 September 30,
2013
 

Net revenues (in thousands)

                         

Aerospace

 $52,726 $61,901 $55,908 $59,378 $52,272 $49,319 $51,015 $44,498 

Chemical processing

  29,688  37,833  32,565  34,553  26,287  33,895  31,824  32,084 

Land-based gas turbines

  30,104  32,167  27,971  28,940  22,628  30,248  24,199  24,982 

Other markets

  12,721  23,082  21,280  24,477  10,618  12,034  14,677  11,591 
                  

Total product revenue

  125,239  154,983  137,724  147,348  111,805  125,496  121,715  113,155 

Other revenue

  3,612  3,899  3,850  2,906  2,495  3,705  1,872  2,503 
                  

Net revenues

 $128,851 $158,882 $141,574 $150,254 $114,300 $129,201 $123,587 $115,658 
                  

Shipments by markets (in thousands of pounds)

                         

Aerospace

  1,970  2,421  2,175  2,368  2,116  1,981  2,077  1,933 

Chemical processing

  1,121  1,500  1,304  1,358  986  1,429  1,386  1,414 

Land-based gas turbines

  1,585  1,771  1,559  1,605  1,261  1,809  1,599  1,458 

Other markets

  456  782  673  739  322  362  478  432 
                  

Total shipments

  5,132  6,474  5,711  6,070  4,685  5,581  5,540  5,237 
                  

Average selling price per pound

                         

Aerospace

 $26.76 $25.57 $25.70 $25.08 $24.70 $24.90 $24,56 $23.02 

Chemical processing

  26.48  25.22  24.97  25.44  26.66  23.72  22.96  22.69 

Land-based gas turbines

  18.99  18.16  17.94  18.03  17.94  16.72  15.13  17.13 

Other markets

  27.90  29.52  31.62  33.12  32.98  33.24  30.71  26.83 

Total average selling price (product only; excluding other revenue)

  24.40  23.94  24.12  24.27  23.86  22.49  21.97  21.61 

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

  25.11  24.54  24.79  24.75  24.40  23.15  22.31  22.08 


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Year Ended September 30, 20132015 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 20122014

($ in thousands)thousands, except per share figures)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 

 

Change

 

 

 

2014

    

2015

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues

    

$

455,410

    

100.0

%  

$

487,635

    

100.0

%  

$

32,225

    

7.1

%

Cost of sales

 

 

408,112

 

89.6

%  

 

393,971

 

80.8

%  

 

(14,141)

 

(3.5)

%

Gross profit

 

 

47,298

 

10.4

%  

 

93,664

 

19.2

%  

 

46,366

 

98.0

%

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

38,693

 

8.5

%  

 

42,572

 

8.7

%  

 

3,879

 

10.0

%

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,556

 

0.8

%  

 

3,598

 

0.7

%  

 

42

 

1.2

%

Operating income (loss)

 

 

5,049

 

1.1

%  

 

47,494

 

9.7

%  

 

42,445

 

840.7

%

Interest income

 

 

(139)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(94)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

45

 

(32.4)

%

Interest expense

 

 

68

 

0.0

%  

 

412

 

0.1

%  

 

344

 

505.9

%

Income before income taxes

 

 

5,120

 

1.1

%  

 

47,176

 

9.7

%  

 

42,056

 

821.4

%

Provision for income taxes

 

 

1,369

 

0.3

%  

 

16,690

 

3.4

%  

 

15,321

 

1,119.1

%

Net income (loss)

 

$

3,751

 

0.8

%  

$

30,486

 

6.3

%  

$

26,735

 

712.7

%

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.30

 

 

 

$

2.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

$

0.30

 

 

 

$

2.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,291,881

 

 

 

 

12,331,805

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

 

12,321,700

 

 

 

 

12,344,209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 
 Year Ended September 30, Change 
 
 2012 2013 Amount % 

Net revenues

 $579,561  100.0%$482,746  100.0%$(96,815) (16.7)%

Cost of sales

  458,721  79.1% 409,120  84.7% (49,601) (10.8)%
              

Gross profit

  120,840  20.9% 73,626  15.3% (47,214) (39.1)%

Selling, general and administrative expense

  40,661  7.0% 38,165  7.9% (2,496) (6.1)%

Research and technical expense

  3,285  0.6% 3,505  0.7% 220  6.7%
              

Operating income

  76,894  13.3% 31,956  6.7% (44,938) (58.4)%

Interest income

  (188) 0.0% (114) 0.0% 74  (39.4)%

Interest expense

  87  0.0% 72  0.0% (15) (17.2)%
              

Income before income taxes

  76,995  13.3% 31,998  6.7% (44,997) (58.4)%

Provision for income taxes

  26,813  4.6% 10,421  2.2% (16,392) (61.1)%
              

Net income

 $50,182  8.7%$21,577  4.5%$(28,605) (57.0)%
              

Net income per share:

                   

Basic

 $4.09    $1.75          

Diluted

 $4.07    $1.74          

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                   

Basic

  12,147,179     12,223,838          

Diluted

  12,216,031     12,265,630          

 

Table of Contents

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.


Table of Contents

By market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Year Ended September 30, Change 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 


 2012 2013 Amount % 

    

2014

    

2015

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues(dollars in thousands)

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 $229,913 $197,104 $(32,809) (14.3)%

 

$

195,161

 

$

215,062

 

$

19,901

 

10.2

%

Chemical processing

 134,639 124,090 (10,549) (7.8)%

 

 

113,409

 

 

111,599

 

 

(1,810)

 

(1.6)

%

Land-based gas turbines

 119,182 102,057 (17,125) (14.4)%

 

 

86,743

 

 

74,456

 

 

(12,287)

 

(14.2)

%

Other markets

 81,560 48,920 (32,640) (40.0)%

 

 

44,411

 

 

59,794

 

 

15,383

 

34.6

%

         

Total product revenue

 565,294 472,171 (93,123) (16.5)%

 

 

439,724

 

 

460,911

 

 

21,187

 

4.8

%

Other revenue

 14,267 10,575 (3,692) (25.9)%

 

 

15,686

 

 

26,724

 

 

11,038

 

70.4

%

         

Net revenues

 $579,561 $482,746 $(96,815) (16.7)%

 

$

455,410

 

$

487,635

 

$

32,225

 

7.1

%

         

Pounds by market(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 8,934 8,107 (827) (9.3)%

 

 

8,832

 

 

9,243

 

 

411

 

4.7

%

Chemical processing

 5,283 5,215 (68) (1.3)%

 

 

5,242

 

 

4,298

 

 

(944)

 

(18.0)

%

Land-based gas turbines

 6,520 6,127 (393) (6.0)%

 

 

5,886

 

 

4,657

 

 

(1,229)

 

(20.9)

%

Other markets

 2,650 1,594 (1,056) (39.8)%

 

 

1,701

 

 

2,063

 

 

362

 

21.3

%

         

Total shipments

 23,387 21,043 (2,344) (10.0)%

 

 

21,661

 

 

20,261

 

 

(1,400)

 

(6.5)

%

         

Average selling price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 $25.73 $24.31 $(1.42) (5.5)%

 

$

22.10

 

$

23.27

 

$

1.17

 

5.3

%

Chemical processing

 25.49 23.79 (1.70) (6.7)%

 

 

21.63

 

 

25.97

 

 

4.34

 

20.0

%

Land-based gas turbines

 18.28 16.66 (1.62) (8.9)%

 

 

14.74

 

 

15.99

 

 

1.25

 

8.5

%

Other markets

 30.78 30.69 (0.09) (0.3)%

 

 

26.11

 

 

28.98

 

 

2.87

 

11.0

%

Total product (excluding other revenue)

 24.17 22.44 (1.73) (7.2)%

 

 

20.30

 

 

22.75

 

 

2.45

 

12.1

%

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 $24.78 $22.94 $(1.84) (7.4)%

 

$

21.02

 

$

24.07

 

$

3.05

 

14.5

%

Net Revenues.  Net revenues were $482.7$487.6 million in fiscal 2013,2015, an increase of 7.1% from $455.4 million in fiscal 2014, due to an increase in average selling price per pound partially offset by a decrease in volume. The average product selling price was $22.75 per pound in fiscal 2015, an increase of 12.1%, or $2.45, from $20.30 per pound in fiscal 2014. Volume was 20.3 million pounds in fiscal 2015, a decrease of 16.7%6.5% from $579.621.7 million pounds in fiscal 2014 with reductions primarily in the chemical processing and land-based gas turbines markets. Average product selling price increased due to a combination of the following factors: a change to a higher-value product mix, which represented approximately $2.79 per pound of an increase; increased customer demand due to the end of supply chain destocking, representing approximately $0.49 per pound of an increase, partially offset by lower raw material market prices, which represented a decrease of approximately $0.83 per pound.

Sales to the aerospace market were $215.1 million in fiscal 2012,2015, an increase of 10.2% from $195.2 million in fiscal 2014, due to a 4.7% increase in volume combined with a 5.3%, or $1.17, increase in the average selling price per pound. The increase in volume reflects the better flow of inventory in the aerospace supply chain which was more reflective of end-use demand than in prior periods.  The average selling price per pound increased primarily due to the impact of a large, lower-priced ingot project that shipped in fiscal 2014, which represented approximately $0.94 of an increase, combined with a change to a higher-value product mix, which represented approximately $1.06 of an increase.  Lower raw material market prices represented approximately $0.83 of a decrease in the average selling price. 

Sales to the chemical processing market were $111.6 million in fiscal 2015, a decrease of 1.6% from $113.4 million in fiscal 2014, due to an 18.0% decrease in volume, partially offset by a 20.0%, or $4.34, increase in the average selling price per pound. The increase in the average selling price reflects a higher-value product mix, which increased average selling price by approximately $3.79 per pound, along with increased pricing, which represented an increase of approximately $1.56 per pound, partially offset by lower raw material market prices, which represented a decrease of approximately $1.01 per pound.

Sales to the land‑based gas turbine market were $74.5 million in fiscal 2015, a decrease of 14.2% from

41


Table of Contents

$86.7 million in fiscal 2014, due to a 20.9% decrease in volume partially offset by an increase of 8.5%, or $1.25, in the average selling price per pound. The decrease in volume is due primarily due to lower levels of transactional business resulting from falling nickel prices and sporadic demand.  The increase in average selling price per pound reflects a change to a higher-value product mix, which represented approximately $0.65, increased pricing, which represented an increase of approximately $1.30 per pound, slightly offset by lower raw material market prices, which represented a decrease of approximately $0.70 per pound.

Sales to other markets were $59.8 million in fiscal 2015, an increase of 34.6% from $44.4 million in fiscal 2014, due to an 11.0%, or $2.87, increase in average selling price per pound combined with lowera 21.3% increase in volume. The totalincrease in volume is due to specialty application project orders shipped in fiscal 2015, which reflects the project-oriented nature of these markets.  The increase in the average selling price was $22.94reflects a change in product mix resulting from the increase of sales of higher‑value forms and alloys, which represented an increase of approximately $4.60 per pound, in fiscal 2013,and continued price competition, which represented a decrease of 7.4%, or $1.84, from $24.78approximately $1.00 per pound, in fiscal 2012. Volume was 21.0 million pounds in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 10.0% from 23.4 million pounds in fiscal 2012. Volume declined primarily due to destocking in the aerospace and land-based gas turbine markets, a decline in activity in the project-oriented other markets, uncertain economic conditions and declining raw material prices causing customers to delay ordering. Average selling price decreased due tocombined with lower raw material market prices, which represented a decrease of approximately $1.01$0.73 per pound.

Other Revenue.  Other revenue was $26.7 million in fiscal 2015, an increase of 70.4% from $15.7 million in fiscal 2014. The increase in other revenue is primarily attributable to increased conversion services, in part from the acquisition of the Leveltek-LaPorte operations.

Cost of Sales.  Cost of sales was $394.0 million, or 80.8% of net revenues, in fiscal 2015 compared to $408.1 million, or 89.6% of net revenues, in fiscal 2014. Cost of sales in fiscal 2015 decreased by $14.1 million as compared to fiscal 2014 primarily due to lower volume, partially offset by a higher-value product mix sold.

Gross Profit.  As a result of the above factors, gross margin was $93.7 million for fiscal 2015, an increase of $46.4 million from $47.3 million in fiscal 2014. Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue increased to 19.2% in fiscal 2015 as compared to 10.4% in fiscal 2014.  The increase in gross profit as a percentage of net revenue is primarily attributable to increased average selling prices and increased volumes of higher-value products, including proprietary and specialty alloy products related to specialty application projects in fiscal 2015. 

Selling, General and Administrative Expense.  Selling, general and administrative expense was $42.6 million for fiscal 2015, an increase of $3.9 million, or 10.0%, from $38.7 million in fiscal 2014. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 8.7% for fiscal 2015, compared to 8.5% for fiscal 2014.  Higher incentive compensation and commissions as compared to the prior year were partially offset by foreign currency gains.  

Research and Technical Expense.  Research and technical expense was $3.6 million, or 0.7% of revenue, for fiscal 2015, compared to $3.6 million, or 0.8% of net revenue, in fiscal 2014.

Operating Income.  As a result of the above factors, operating income in fiscal 2015 was $47.5 million, compared to operating income of $5.0 million in fiscal 2014.

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense was $16.7 million in fiscal 2015, an increase of $15.3 million from $1.4 million in fiscal 2014, due primarily to higher pretax income generated in fiscal 2015. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2015 was 35.4%, compared to 26.7% in fiscal 2014. During fiscal 2015, the Company’s effective tax rate was higher than fiscal 2014, primarily due to a lower proportion of taxable earnings in foreign jurisdictions with a lower tax rate.  Furthermore, the tax rate was higher in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 due to a change in the Indiana tax law that was enacted in May 2015, which decreased the deferred tax asset and increased tax expense by $1.2 million.   This change in tax law is expected to have a favorable impact on the Company’s tax rate beginning in fiscal 2017. 

Net Income.  As a result of the above factors, net income in fiscal 2015 was $30.5 million, an increase of $26.7 million from net income of $3.8 million in fiscal 2014.

42


Table of Contents

Year Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2013

($ in thousands, except per share figures)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 

 

Change

 

 

 

2013

    

2014

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues

    

$

482,746

    

100.0

%  

$

455,410

    

100.0

%  

$

(27,336)

    

(5.7)

%

Cost of sales

 

 

409,120

 

84.7

%  

 

408,112

 

89.6

%  

 

(1,008)

 

(0.2)

%

Gross profit

 

 

73,626

 

15.3

%  

 

47,298

 

10.4

%  

 

(26,328)

 

(35.8)

%

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

38,165

 

7.9

%  

 

38,693

 

8.5

%  

 

528

 

1.4

%

Research and technical expense

 

 

3,505

 

0.7

%  

 

3,556

 

0.8

%  

 

51

 

1.5

%

Operating income

 

 

31,956

 

6.7

%  

 

5,049

 

1.1

%  

 

(26,907)

 

(84.2)

%

Interest income

 

 

(114)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(139)

 

(0.0)

%  

 

(25)

 

21.9

%

Interest expense

 

 

72

 

0.0

%  

 

68

 

0.0

%  

 

(4)

 

(5.6)

%

Income before income taxes

 

 

31,998

 

6.7

%  

 

5,120

 

1.1

%  

 

(26,878)

 

(84.0)

%

Provision for income taxes

 

 

10,421

 

2.2

%  

 

1,369

 

0.3

%  

 

(9,052)

 

(86.9)

%

Net income

 

$

21,577

 

4.5

%  

$

3,751

 

0.8

%  

$

(17,826)

 

(82.6)

%

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.75

 

 

 

$

0.30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

$

1.74

 

 

 

$

0.30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

12,223,838

 

 

 

 

12,291,881

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

 

12,265,630

 

 

 

 

12,321,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by the Company for the periods shown.

By market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

Amount

    

%

 

Net revenues (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

197,104

 

$

195,161

 

$

(1,943)

 

(1.0)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

124,090

 

 

113,409

 

 

(10,681)

 

(8.6)

%

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

102,057

 

 

86,743

 

 

(15,314)

 

(15.0)

%

Other markets

 

 

48,920

 

 

44,411

 

 

(4,509)

 

(9.2)

%

Total product revenue

 

 

472,171

 

 

439,724

 

 

(32,447)

 

(6.9)

%

Other revenue

 

 

10,575

 

 

15,686

 

 

5,111

 

48.3

%

Net revenues

 

$

482,746

 

$

455,410

 

$

(27,336)

 

(5.7)

%

Pounds by market (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

 

8,107

 

 

8,832

 

 

725

 

8.9

%

Chemical processing

 

 

5,215

 

 

5,242

 

 

27

 

0.5

%

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

6,127

 

 

5,886

 

 

(241)

 

(3.9)

%

Other markets

 

 

1,594

 

 

1,701

 

 

107

 

6.7

%

Total shipments

 

 

21,043

 

 

21,661

 

 

618

 

2.9

%

Average selling price per pound

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace

 

$

24.31

 

$

22.10

 

$

(2.21)

 

(9.1)

%

Chemical processing

 

 

23.79

 

 

21.63

 

 

(2.16)

 

(9.1)

%

Land-based gas turbines

 

 

16.66

 

 

14.74

 

 

(1.92)

 

(11.5)

%

Other markets

 

 

30.69

 

 

26.11

 

 

(4.58)

 

(14.9)

%

Total product (excluding other revenue)

 

 

22.44

 

 

20.30

 

 

(2.14)

 

(9.5)

%

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 

$

22.94

 

$

21.02

 

$

(1.92)

 

(8.4)

%

Net Revenues.  Net revenues were $455.4 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of 5.7% from $482.7 million in fiscal 2013, due to a decrease in average product selling price per pound partially offset by an increase in volume.  The average

43


Table of Contents

product selling price was $20.30 per pound in fiscal 2014, a decrease of 9.5%, or $2.14, from $22.44 per pound in fiscal 2013. Volume was 21.7 million pounds in fiscal 2014, an increase of 2.9% from 21.0 million pounds in fiscal 2013.  The increase in volume is due primarily to a project that shipped in fiscal 2014 of lower-priced product in ingot form.  Average product selling price decreased due to a combination of the decrease; lower volume of conversion sales,following factors: a change to a lower-value product mix, which represented approximately $0.12$0.82 per pound of the decrease; a higher level of price competition and reduced customer demand due to supply chain destocking decliningand fluctuating nickel prices, and uncertain economic conditions, which forced usthe Company to reduce prices in order to be competitive, representing approximately $0.71$1.53 per pound of the decrease.decrease; partially offset higher raw material market prices, which represented an increase of approximately $0.19 per pound.

Sales to the aerospace market were $195.2 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of 1.0% from $197.1 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 14.3% from $229.9 million in fiscal 2012, due to a 9.3% decreasean 8.9% increase in volume combined withoffset by a 5.5%9.1%, or $1.42,$2.21, decrease in the average selling price per pound.  The decreaseincrease in volume is due primarily to destockinga project that shipped in fiscal 2014 of inventory within the supply chain and customers delaying orders as the price of nickel declined and economic conditions remained uncertain.lower-priced product in ingot form. The average selling price per pound decline primarily reflects the decline in raw material market prices, which represented approximately $0.99 per pound of the decrease and continued price competition, which represented approximately $0.26$1.25 of the decrease, and the impact of the large ingot project, which represented approximately $0.95 of the decrease.

Sales to the chemical processing market were $113.4 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of 8.6% from $124.1 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 7.8% from $134.6 million in fiscal 2012, due to a 1.3% decrease in volume combined with a 6.7%9.1%, or $1.70,$2.16, decrease in the average selling price per pound.pound, partially offset by a 0.5% increase in volume.  The decrease in the average selling price reflects continued price


Table of Contents

competition (which is most significant in this market), which represented a decrease of approximately $2.05$2.43 per pound, of the decrease; lowerpartially offset by higher raw material market prices, which represented an increase of approximately $1.09 of the decrease; partially offset by$0.21 per pound, along with a higher value product mix, resulting from shipping a higher percentage of sheet and plate products, which increased average selling price by approximately $1.44$0.07 per pound.

Sales to the land-based gas turbine market were $86.7 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of 15.0% from $102.1 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 14.4% from $119.2 million in fiscal 2012, due to a 6.0%3.9% decrease in volume combined with a decrease of 8.9%11.5%, or $1.62,$1.92, in the average selling price per pound. The decrease in volume is due primarily to lower activity of new builds by original equipment manufacturers.reduced customer demand and customers’ maintaining reduced inventory levels within the supply chain.  The decrease in average selling price per pound reflected lowerreflects continued price competition, which represented a decrease of approximately $1.56 per pound, slightly offset by higher raw material market prices, which represented an increase of approximately $0.96$0.18 per pound ofpound.  Additionally, the decrease. The change in average selling price due towas impacted by a change in product mix, which representedrepresenting a decrease of approximately $0.53$0.54 per pound, ofresulting from the decrease resulted from the increase ofin sales of lower-valuehigher-value forms and alloys and forms, predominately slab, as a percentage of pounds sold in this market.

Sales to other markets were $44.4 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of 9.2% from $48.9 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 40.0% from $81.6 million in fiscal 2012, due to a 0.3%14.9%, or $0.09,$4.58, decrease in average selling price per pound combined withpartially offset by a 39.8% decrease6.7% increase in volume.  The decrease in volume andthe average selling price is primarily attributable to one particular tubular oil & gas projectreflects a change in product mix resulting from the decrease of sales of higher-value forms and alloys, which represented a decrease of approximately $3.63 per pound, and continued price competition, which represented a decrease of approximately $1.16 per pound, partially offset by higher raw material market prices, which represented an increase of approximately $0.21 per pound.

Other Revenue.Other revenue was $15.7 million in fiscal 2012, representing approximately 0.52014, an increase of 48.3% from $10.6 million pounds and $18.5 million of net revenues, which was not repeated in fiscal 2013.  The other markets are project-oriented in general, and it is uncertain whether a similar project will repeat itself in the future.

        Other Revenue.    Other revenue was $10.6 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 25.9% from $14.3 million in fiscal 2012. The decreaseincrease in other revenue is primarily attributable to approximately $2.6 million of reducedincreased conversion and miscellaneous sales.

Cost of Sales.Cost of sales was $408.1 million, or 89.6% of net revenues, in fiscal 2014 compared to $409.1 million, or 84.7% of net revenues, in fiscal 2013 compared to $458.7 million, or 79.1% of net revenues, in fiscal 2012.2013. Cost of sales in fiscal 20132014 decreased by $49.6$1.0 million as compared to fiscal 20122013 primarily due to lower volume. When volume decreases, the cost of sales as percentage of net revenues increases due to reduced absorption of manufacturing costs.a lower-value product mix.

        GrossGross Profit.As a result of the above factors, gross margin was $73.6$47.3 million for fiscal 2013,2014, a decrease of $47.2$26.3 million from $120.8$73.6 million in fiscal 2012.2013.  Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 10.4% in fiscal 2014 as compared to 15.3% in fiscal 2013 as compared to 20.9% in fiscal 2012. Items2013.  The main items impacting the gross margin percentage compression includewas pricing competition and the impact of high cost raw material flowing through cost of sales, which we estimateis estimated to have negatively impacted gross profit margin percentage by 3.1over 7.0 percentage points.  The remaining 2.5Partially offsetting this compression was a nearly 2.0 percentage point compression is theexpansion as a result of other factors, including higher-cost inventoryprimarily better volumes and price increases in costthe latter half of sales relative to lower raw material market prices that drive the sales price and unfavorable absorption of fixed costs.year. 

Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense was $38.2$38.7 million for fiscal 2013, a decrease2014, an increase of $2.5$0.5 million, or 6.1%1.4%, from $40.7$38.2 million in fiscal 2012. Selling, general and administrative expense reductions were primarily due to reduced costs for incentive compensation programs.2013.  Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to 8.5% for fiscal 2014, compared to 7.9% for fiscal 2013 compared to 7.0% for fiscal 2012primarily due to decreased revenues.

44


Table of Contents

Research and Technical Expense.Research and technical expense was $3.6 million, or 0.8% of revenue, for fiscal 2014, an increase of $0.1 million, or 1.5%, from $3.5 million, or 0.7% of revenue, for fiscal 2013, an increase of $0.2 million, or 6.7%, from $3.3 million, or 0.6% of net revenues, in fiscal 2012.2013.

Operating Income.As a result of the above factors, operating income in fiscal 20132014 was $32.0$5.0 million, compared to operating income of $77.0$32.0 million in fiscal 2012.2013.

Income Taxes.Income tax expense was $1.4 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of $9.1 million from an expense of $10.4 million in fiscal 2013, a decrease of $16.4 million from an expense of $26.8 million in fiscal 2012, due primarily to lower pretax income generated in fiscal 2013.2014.  The effective tax rate for fiscal 20132014 was 32.6%26.7%, compared to 34.8%32.6% in fiscal 2012.2013. During fiscal 2013,2014, the Company'sCompany’s effective tax rate was lower than fiscal 2013, primarily due to an increased proportion of taxable earnings in foreign jurisdictions with a lower tax rate and the reversal of certain tax reserves no longer required.


rate.

Table of Contents

Net Income.As a result of the above factors, net income in fiscal 2013,2014 was $21.6$3.8 million, a decrease of $28.6$17.8 million from net income of $50.2$21.6 million in fiscal 2012.2013.

Year Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2011

($ in thousands)

 
 Year Ended September 30, Change 
 
 2011 2012 Amount % 

Net revenues

 $542,896  100.0%$579,561  100.0%$36,665  6.8%

Cost of sales

  449,116  82.7% 458,721  79.1% 9,605  2.1%
              

Gross profit

  93,780  17.3% 120,840  20.9% 27,060  28.9%

Selling, general and administrative expense

  41,215  7.6% 40,661  7.0% (554) (1.3)%

Research and technical expense

  3,259  0.6% 3,285  0.6% 26  0.8%
              

Operating income

  49,306  9.1% 76,894  13.3% 27,588  56.0%

Interest income

  (248) 0.0% (188) 0.0% 60  (24.2)%

Interest expense

  156  0.0% 87  0.0% (69) (44.2)%
              

Income before income taxes

  49,398  9.1% 76,995  13.3% 27,597  55.9%

Provision for income taxes

  18,270  3.4% 26,813  4.6% 8,543  46.8%
              

Net income

 $31,128  5.7%$50,182  8.7%$19,054  61.2%
              

Net income per share:

                   

Basic

 $2.55    $4.09          

Diluted

 $2.54    $4.07          

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                   

Basic

  12,067,555     12,147,179          

Diluted

  12,149,866     12,216,031          

        The following table includes a breakdown of net revenues, shipments and average selling prices to the markets served by Haynes for the periods shown.


Table of Contents

By market

 
 Year Ended
September 30,
 Change 
 
 2011 2012 Amount % 

Net revenues(dollars in thousands)

             

Aerospace

 $203,561 $229,913 $26,352  12.9%

Chemical processing

  149,973  134,639  (15,334) (10.2)%

Land-based gas turbines

  98,224  119,182  20,958  21.3%

Other markets

  76,667  81,560  4,893  6.4%
          

Total product revenue

  528,425  565,294  36,869  7.0%

Other revenue

  14,471  14,267  (204) (1.4)%
          

Net revenues

 $542,896 $579,561 $36,665  6.8%
          

Pounds by market(in thousands)

             

Aerospace

  8,120  8,934  814  10.0%

Chemical processing

  6,965  5,283  (1,682) (24.1)%

Land-based gas turbines

  5,546  6,520  974  17.6%

Other markets

  2,999  2,650  (349) (11.6)%
          

Total shipments

  23,630  23,387  (243) (1.0)%
          

Average selling price per pound

             

Aerospace

 $25.07 $25.73 $0.66  2.6%

Chemical processing

  21.53  25.49  3.96  18.4%

Land-based gas turbines

  17.71  18.28  0.57  3.2%

Other markets

  25.56  30.78  5.22  20.4%

Total product (excluding other revenue)

  22.36  24.17  1.81  8.1%

Total average selling price (including other revenue)

 $22.97 $24.78  1.81  7.9%

        Net Revenues.    Net revenues were $579.6 million in fiscal 2012, an increase of 6.8% from $542.9 million in fiscal 2011, due to increase in average selling price per pound partially offset by lower volume. The total average selling price was $24.78 per pound in fiscal 2012, an increase of 7.9% from $22.97 per pound in fiscal 2011. Volume was 23.4 million pounds in fiscal 2012, a decrease of 1.0% from 23.6 million pounds in fiscal 2011. Average selling price increased due to improved product mix supported by continued customer demand, while volume remained essentially unchanged year over year. The Company's consolidated backlog was $222.9 million at September 30, 2012, a decrease of 18.5% from $273.4 million at September 30, 2011. This decrease reflects a 24.0% decrease in backlog pounds partially offset by a 7.3% increase in backlog average selling price.

 Sales to the aerospace market were $229.9 million in fiscal 2012, an increase of 12.9% from $203.6 million in fiscal 2011, due to a 10.0% increase in volume combined with a 2.6% increase in the average selling price per pound. The increase in volume and average selling price per pound is due to increased customer demand in the aerospace market as evidenced by the production schedules for new commercial aircraft production. The requirement for more fuel-efficient engines in the commercial airline industry continues to drive demand in this market.

        Sales to the chemical processing market were $134.6 million in fiscal 2012, a decrease of 10.2% from $150.0 million in fiscal 2011, due to a 24.1% decrease in volume partially offset by an 18.4% increase in the average selling price per pound. The decrease in volume relates to a large project that shipped in fiscal 2011 that was not repeated in fiscal 2012, which represented approximately 1.9 million pounds and $29.4 million. The increase in the average selling price is attributable to a higher value product mix shipped into the chemical processing market, which represented approximately $3.13 of the increase.


Table of Contents

        Sales to the land-based gas turbine market were $119.2 million in fiscal 2012, an increase of 21.3% from $98.2 million in fiscal 2011, due to a 17.6% increase in volume combined with an increase of 3.2% in the average selling price per pound. The increases in both volume and average selling price are due to increased customer demand in the land-based gas turbine market, especially from the original equipment manufacturers.

        Sales to other markets were $81.6 million in fiscal 2012, an increase of 6.4% from $76.7 million in fiscal 2011, due to a 20.4% increase in average selling price per pound partially offset by an 11.6% decrease in volume. The decrease in volume is due to the project-oriented nature of these markets. The increase in average selling price reflects a change to a mix of higher value alloy and forms sold into the other market category, primarily from increased sales of tubular products.

        Other Revenue.    Other revenue was $14.3 million in fiscal 2012, a decrease of 1.4% from $14.5 million in fiscal 2011.

        Cost of Sales.    Cost of sales was $458.7 million, or 79.1% of net revenues, in fiscal 2012 compared to $449.1 million, or 82.7% of net revenues, in fiscal 2011. Cost of sales in fiscal 2012 increased by $9.6 million as compared to fiscal 2011 primarily due to a higher cost product mix.

        Gross Profit.    As a result of the above factors, gross margin was $120.8 million for fiscal 2012, an increase of $27.1 million from $93.8 in fiscal 2011. Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue increased to 20.9% in fiscal 2012 as compared to 17.3% in fiscal 2011. The improvement in gross margin percentage is due to a higher value product mix resulting in increased average selling prices, cost reduction projects and the benefits gained from completed capital expenditure projects.

        Selling, General and Administrative Expense.    Selling, general and administrative expense was $40.7 million for fiscal 2012, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 1.3%, from $41.2 million in fiscal 2011 due to reduced international sales expenses, primarily from transition of the French service center into a sales office. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 7.0% for fiscal 2012, compared to 7.6% for fiscal 2011, due to increased revenues and decreased expenses.

        Research and Technical Expense.    Research and technical expense was $3.3 million, or 0.6% of revenue, for fiscal 2012, flat from the $3.3 million, or 0.6% of net revenues, in fiscal 2011.

        Operating Income.    As a result of the above factors, operating income in fiscal 2012 was $77.0 million compared to operating income of $49.3 million in fiscal 2011.

        Income Taxes.    Income tax expense was $26.8 million in fiscal 2012, an increase of $8.5 million from an expense of $18.3 million in fiscal 2011, due primarily to higher pretax income generated in fiscal 2012. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2012 was 34.8%, compared to 37.0% in fiscal 2011. The prior year effective tax rate was higher due to Indiana enacting a corporate income tax rate decrease from 8.5% to 6.5%, causing additional income tax expense of $0.7 million reflecting our estimate of the decrease in the deferred tax asset due to the lower tax rate.

        Net Income.    As a result of the above factors, net income in fiscal 2012, was $50.2 million, an increase of $19.1 million from net income of $31.1 million in fiscal 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

    Comparative cash flow analysis

During fiscal 2013,2015, the Company'sCompany’s primary sources of cash were cash on-handon‑hand and cash from operations, as detailed below. At September 30, 2013,2015, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $68.3$49.0 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $46.7$45.9 million at September 30, 2012.


Table of Contents

2014. As of September 30, 20132015, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $9.0$8.8 million that was held by foreign subsidiaries in various currencies. AllSubstantially all of this amount is readily convertible to U.S. dollars and can be repatriated topermanently reinvested in the corporate parent as payment owed for product and/or services. The Company would not need to accrue or pay taxes if repatriated.foreign subsidiaries. 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $73.4$48.4 million in fiscal 20132015 compared to $20.8$26.9 million in fiscal 2012.2014. Net income of $21.6$30.5 million in fiscal 20132015 was $28.6$26.7 million lowerhigher than the $50.2$3.8 million reported in fiscal 2012. Cash2014.  Additional factors in the comparison of net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2014 and 2015 includes cash generated from lower inventories was $31.5$4.1 million compared to fiscal 2014 cash used of $22.3 million, a change of $26.3 million.  Additionally, cash used from higher accounts receivable was $5.0 million as compared to fiscal 20122014 cash usedgenerated from lower accounts receivable of $12.3$9.9 million, a change of $43.8$14.9 million and cash used from lower accounts payable was $8.7 million as compared to fiscal 2014 cash generated from higher accounts payable of $15.7 million, a change of $24.4 million. 

Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2015 of $33.1 million was lower than cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2014 of $39.7 million by $6.5 million as a result of lower additions to property, plant and equipment of $21.2 million offset by the acquisition of the Leveltek – LaPorte assets of $14.6 million. 

Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2015 of $11.4 million included $11.0 million of dividend payments and approximately $0.3 million of stock re-purchases made to satisfy employment withholding taxes in relation to the vesting of restricted stock granted to officers and directors.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $26.9 million in fiscal 2014 compared to $73.4 million in fiscal 2013. Net income of $3.8 million in fiscal 2014 was $17.8 million lower than the $21.6 million reported in fiscal 2013.  Cash used from higher inventories was $22.3 million as compared to fiscal 2013 cash generated of $31.5 million, a change of $53.8 million.  Additionally, cash generated from lower accounts receivable was $18.6$9.9 million compared to cash usedgenerated by accounts receivable of $12.7$18.6 million in fiscal 2012,2013, a change of $31.3$8.7 million.  Cash generated from accounts payable and accrued expenses of $15.7 million compared to cash used in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $12.2 million was $5.1 million lower thanin fiscal 2013, a change of $27.9 million.  Additionally, the cash used in accounts payableaccrued pension and postretirement benefits of $6.1 million was $14.1 million less than the cash used in accrued expensespension and postretirement benefits in fiscal 2012. 2013 of $20.2 million. This reduction of $14.1 million is primarily a result of the Company’s evaluation of its alternatives for cash deployment in fiscal 2014.  Given the business conditions in fiscal 2014, the Company elected to minimize funding for a majority of the fiscal year because it had met its funding requirements for that time. 

45


Table of Contents

Net cash used in investing activities was $39.7 million in fiscal 2014 compared to $41.6 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $25.9 million in fiscal 2012 as a result of higherlower capital expenditures.expenditures in fiscal 2014.  Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 20132014 of $10.4$9.6 million included $10.8 million of dividend payments, partially offset by proceeds and excess tax deductionsfrom exercise of stock options. 

Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2014 of $9.6 million included $10.8 million of dividend payments, partially offset by proceeds from exercises of stock options.

The Company'sCompany’s sources of liquidity for fiscal 20142016 are expected to consist primarily of cash generated from operations, cash on-handon‑hand and, if needed, borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility. The U.S. revolving credit facility provides for borrowings in a maximum amount of $120.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves. At September 30, 2013,2015, the Company had cash of $68.3$49.0 million, an outstanding balance of zero on the U.S. revolving credit facility and access to a total of approximately $120.0 million under the U.S. revolving credit facility, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves.reserves that could limit the Company’s borrowing to approximately $105.0 million. Management believes that the resources described above will be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures and working capital requirements over the next twelve months.

The Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC ("(“Wells Fargo"), successor by merger to Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central) ("Wachovia"Fargo”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the "Amended Agreement"“Amended Agreement”) with certain other lenders with an effective date of July 14, 2011. The maximum revolving loan amount under the Amended Agreement is $120.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves.reserves that could limit the Company’s borrowing to approximately $105.0 million. The Amended Agreement permits an increase in the maximum revolving loan amount from $120.0 million up to an aggregate amount of $170.0 million at the request of the borrowers.Company. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility bear interest at the Company'sCompany’s option at either Wells Fargo's "prime rate"Fargo’s “prime rate”, plus up to 0.75% per annum, or the adjusted Eurodollar rate used by the lender, plus up to 2.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013,2015, the U.S. revolving credit facility had an outstanding balance of zero. In addition, the Company must pay monthly in arrears a commitment fee of 0.25% per annum on the unused amount of the U.S. revolving credit facility total commitment. For letters of credit, the Company must pay 1.5% per annum on the daily outstanding balance of all issued letters of credit, plus customary fees for issuance, amendments and processing. The Company is subject to certain covenants as to fixed charge coverage ratios and other customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of indebtedness, the granting of liens and the sale of assets. The covenant pertaining to fixed charge coverage ratios is only effective in the event the amount of excess availability under the revolver is less than 12.5% of the maximum credit revolving amount. The Company is permitted to pay dividends and repurchase common stock if certain financial metrics are met (which do not apply in the case of dividends less than $20.0 million in the aggregate in a year and repurchases in connection with the vesting of shares of restricted stock). As of September 30, 2013,2015, the most recent required measurement date under the Amended Agreement, management believes the Company was in compliance with those covenants.all applicable financial covenants under the Amended Agreement. The U.S. revolving credit facility matures on July 14, 2016. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the U.S. assets of the Company, including the equity interests in its U.S. subsidiaries, but excluding the


Table of Contents

four-high four‑high Steckel rolling mill and related assets, which are pledged to Titanium Metals Corporation to secure the performance of the Company'sCompany’s obligations under a Conversion Services Agreement with TIMET (see discussion of TIMET at Note 15 in the Company'sCompany’s to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K)10‑K). The U.S. revolving credit facility is also secured by a pledge of a 65% equity interest in each of the Company'sCompany’s direct foreign subsidiaries.

    Future uses of liquidity

The Company'sCompany’s primary uses of cash over the next twelve months are expected to consist of expenditures related to:

    ·

    Funding operations;

    ·

    Capital spending (detailed above);

Funding operations;46

Capital spending (detailed below); and

Dividends to stockholders.


 

Table of Contents

·

Dividends to stockholders; and

·

Pension and postretirement plan contributions.

Capital investment in fiscal 20132015 including the acquisition of the Leveltek - Laporte assets was $41.6$33.1 million, and the plan for capital spending in fiscal 20142016 is $57.0$35.0 million. See "Summary“Summary of Capital Spending"Spending” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for additional discussion of actual and planned capital spending.

The following table sets forth the Company'sCompany’s contractual obligations for the periods indicated, as of September 30, 2013:2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

1 year

 

1-3 Years

 

3-5 Years

 

5 years

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Credit facility fees(1)

    

$

267

    

$

267

    

$

 —

    

$

    

$

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

7,141

 

 

2,851

 

 

3,321

 

 

963

 

 

6

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

10,921

 

 

567

 

 

1,138

 

 

1,116

 

 

8,100

 

Raw material contracts (primarily nickel)

 

 

23,988

 

 

23,732

 

 

256

 

 

 

 

 

Capital projects and other commitments

 

 

32,092

 

 

32,092

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Pension plan(2)

 

 

109,088

 

 

6,000

 

 

15,563

 

 

16,489

 

 

71,036

 

Non-qualified pension plans

 

 

857

 

 

95

 

 

190

 

 

190

 

 

382

 

Other postretirement benefits(3)

 

 

49,870

 

 

4,870

 

 

10,000

 

 

10,000

 

 

25,000

 

Environmental post-closure monitoring

 

 

844

 

 

89

 

 

161

 

 

175

 

 

419

 

Total

 

$

235,068

 

$

70,563

 

$

30,629

 

$

28,933

 

$

104,943

 


 
 Payments Due by Period 
Contractual Obligations
 Total Less than
1 year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than
5 years
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Credit facility fees(1)

 $947 $340 $607 $ $ 

Operating lease obligations

  9,092  3,119  3,284  2,136  553 

Capital lease obligations

  192  33  66  66  27 

Raw material contracts (primarily nickel)

  50,566  31,031  19,535     

Mill supplies contracts

  717  717       

Capital projects

  36,713  36,713       

External product conversion source

  2,900  600  1,200  1,100   

Pension plan(2)

  64,214    16,340  16,208  31,666 

Non-qualified pension plans

  825  95  190  190  350 

Other postretirement benefits(3)

  49,823  4,823  10,000  10,000  25,000 

Environmental post-closure monitoring

  1,077  79  169  163  666 
            

Total

 $217,066 $77,550 $51,391 $29,863 $58,262 
            

(1)

As of September 30, 2015, the revolver balance was zero, therefore no interest is due. However, the Company is obligated to the Bank for unused line fees and quarterly management fees.

(1)
As of September 30, 2013, the revolver balance was zero, therefore no interest is due. However, the Company is obligated to the Bank for unused line fees and quarterly management fees.

(2)
The Company has a funding obligation to contribute $64,214 to the domestic pension plan. These payments will be tax deductible. All benefit payments under the domestic pension plan will come from the plan and not the Company.

(3)
Represents expected other postretirement benefits based upon anticipated timing of payments.

(2)

The Company has a funding obligation to contribute $109,088 to the domestic pension plan. These payments will be tax deductible. All benefit payments under the domestic pension plan will come from the plan and not the Company.


(3)

Represents expected other postretirement benefits based upon anticipated timing of payments.

Table of Contents

Inflation or Deflation

While neither inflation nor deflation has had, nor does the Company expect them to have, a material impact on operating results, there can be no assurance that the Company'sCompany’s business will not be affected by inflation or deflation in the future. Historically, the Company has had the ability to pass on to customers both increases in consumable costs and material costs because of the value-addedvalue‑added contribution the material makes to the final product. Raw material comprises the most significant portion of the product costs. Nickel, cobalt and molybdenum, the primary raw materials used to manufacture the Company'sCompany’s products, all have experienced significant fluctuations in price. In the future, the Company may not be able to successfully offset rapid increases in the price of nickel or other raw materials. In the event of raw material price declines, the Company'sCompany’s customers may delay order patternsplacement, resulting in lower volumes. In the event that raw material price increases occur that the Company is unable to pass on to its customers itsoccur, the Company’s cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

47


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-goingon‑going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, income taxes, asset impairments, retirement benefits, matters related to product liability and other lawsuits and environmental matters. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, pension asset mix and, in some cases, actuarial techniques, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of this process form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The Company routinely reevaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company'sCompany’s accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K. The Company has identified certain critical accounting policies, which are described below. The following listing of policies is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company'sCompany’s accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management'smanagement’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management'smanagement’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Revenue is recognized when collectability is reasonably assured and when title passes to the customer which is generally at the time of shipment (F.O.B. shipping point or at a foreign port for certain export customers). Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a component of net revenues in the periods in which the related sales are recognized. Management determines this allowance based on historical experience. Should returns increase above historical experience, additional allowances may be required. Additionally, the Company recognizes revenue attributable to an up-frontup‑front fee received from Titanium Metals Corporation ("TIMET"(“TIMET”) as a result of a twenty-yeartwenty‑year agreement, entered into on November, 17,


Table of Contents

2006 to provide conversion services to TIMET. See Note 15 Deferred Revenue for a description of accounting treatment relating to this up-frontup‑front fee.

The Company has defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering most of its current and former employees. Significant elements in determining the assets or liabilities and related income or expense for these plans are the expected return on plan assets (if any), the discount rate used to value future payment streams, expected trends in health care costs, and other actuarial assumptions. Annually, the Company evaluates the significant assumptions to be used to value its pension and postretirement plan assets and liabilities based on current market conditions and expectations of future costs. If actual results are less favorable than those projected by management, additional expense may be required in future periods.

The selection of the Plan'sPlan’s assumption for the expected long-termlong‑term rate of return on plan assets is based upon the Plan'sPlan’s target allocation of 60% equities and 40% bonds, and the expected rate of return for each equity/bond asset class. Based upon the target allocation and each asset class'sclass’s expected return, the Plan'sPlan’s return on assets assumption of 7.50% is reasonable, and is unchanged from last year'syear’s assumption. The return on assets is based on fair value of the plan assets and their investment allocation at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company also realizes that historical performance is no guarantee of future performance.

48


In the short term, substantial decreases in plan assets will result in higher plan funding contribution levels and higher pension expenses. A decrease of 25 basis points in the expected long-termlong‑term rate of return on plan assets would result in an increase in annual pension expense of about $473,000.$457,000. To the extent that the actual return on plan assets during the year exceeds or falls short of the assumed long-termlong‑term rate of return, an asset gain or loss is created. GainsFor funding purposes, gains and losses are generally amortized over a 7-year7‑year period. As an example, each $1.0 million in asset loss created by unfavorable investment performance results in seven annual payments (contributions) of approximately $170,000 depending upon the precise effective interest rate in the valuation and the timing of the contribution.

Decreases in discount rates used to value future payment streams will result in higher liabilities for pension and postretirement plans. A decrease of 25 basis points would result in $8.3$10.1 million higher liability for the U.S. pension plan and $3.8$4.8 million higher liability for the postretirement plan. This increase in liability would also increase the accumulated other comprehensive loss that would be amortized as higher pension and postretirement expense over an amortization period of approximately 8.57.4 and 10.58.5 years, respectively.

In accordance with the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014, released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014, the Company applied the new mortality assumptions which were used in the determination of the projected benefit obligation as of September 30, 2015.  These new assumptions reflected a mortality improvement that was the primary determinant in realizing actuarial losses of $21.9 million and $5.1 million in pension and postretirement plans, respectively.  These losses result in increases in the accrued pension liability, the accrued post-retirement liability, and corresponding increases in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Salaried employees hired after December 31, 2005 and hourly employees hired after June 30, 2007 are not covered by the pension plan; however, they are eligible for an enhanced matching program of the defined contribution plan (401(k)). Effective December 31, 2007, the U.S. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for all non-unionnon‑union employees in the U.S. Effective September 30, 2009, the U.K. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for employees in the plan.

The Company reviews long-livedlong‑lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-livedlong‑lived assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company reviews for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicated that the carrying amount may be impaired.


Table of Contents

On February 23, 2009, the Company adopted a restricted stock plan that reserved 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance. Grants of restricted stock are grants of shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock subject to transfer restrictions, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may set vesting requirements based on the achievement of specific performance goals or the passage of time.

Restricted shares are subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates prior to the vesting perioddate or if theany applicable performance goal is not met. The Company will assess, on an ongoing basis, the probability of whether the performance criteria will be achieved. The Company will recognize compensation expense over the performance period if it is deemed probable that the goal will be achieved. The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s restricted stock is determined based upon the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock on the grant date. The plan provides for the adjustment of the number of shares covered by an outstanding grant and the maximum number of shares for which restricted stock may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event.

The Company has two stock option plans that authorize the granting of non-qualifiednon‑ qualified stock options to certain key

49


employees and non-employeenon‑employee directors for the purchase of a maximum of 1,500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. The original option plan was adopted in August 2004 pursuant to the plan of reorganization and provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. In January 2007, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors adopted a second option plan that provides for options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. Each plan provides for the adjustment of the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, options granted under the option plans are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant and vest 331/3% per year over three years from the grant date. The amount of compensation cost recognized in the financial statements is measured based upon the grant date fair value. The fair value of the option grants is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-ScholesBlack‑Scholes option pricing model with assumptions on dividend yield, risk-freerisk‑free interest rate, expected volatilities, expected forfeiture rate and expected lives of the options.

The Company accounts for deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company assesses prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income.

        On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted guidance prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. It also provides guidance related to reversal of tax positions, balance sheet classification, interest and penalties, interim period accounting, disclosure and transition.


Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2.—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding New Accounting Standards.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Ris
k

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. The Company is exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and the price of raw materialmaterials, particularly nickel.

Changes in interest rates affect the Company'sCompany’s interest expense on variable rate debt. All of the Company'sCompany’s revolver availability is at a variable rate at September 30, 20122014 and 2013.2015. The Company'sCompany’s outstanding variable rate debt was zero at September 30, 20122014 and 2013.2015. The Company has not entered into any derivative instruments to hedge the effects of changes in interest rates.

The foreign currency exchange risk exists primarily because the Company’s foreign subsidiaries maintain receivables and payables denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. The foreign subsidiaries manage their own foreign currency exchange risk. The U.S. operations transact their foreign sales in U.S. dollars, thereby avoiding fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Any exposure aggregating more than $500,000 requires approval from the Company'sCompany’s Vice President of Finance. The Company is not currently party to any currency contracts.

Fluctuations in the price of nickel, the Company'sCompany’s most significant raw material, subject the Company to commodity price risk. The Company manages its exposure to this market risk through internally established policies and procedures, including negotiating raw material escalators within product sales agreements and continually monitoring and revising customer quote amounts to reflect the fluctuations in market prices for nickel. The Company does not presently use derivative instruments to manage this market risk but may in the future. The Company monitors its underlying market risk exposure from a rapid change in nickel prices on an ongoing basis and believes that it can modify or adapt its strategies as necessary. The Company periodically purchases raw material forward with certain suppliers. However, there is a risk that the Company may not be able to successfully offset a rapid increase or decrease in the cost of raw material in the future.


50


Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Dat
a

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Haynes International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 20132015 and 20122014 and for the years ended September 30, 2013,2015, September 30, 20122014 and September 30, 20112013


Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


54
52 

Consolidated Balance Sheets


56
53 

Consolidated Statements of Operations


57
54 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)


58
55 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity


59
56 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


60
57 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


61
58 


51


REPOR
REPORTT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Haynes International, Inc.

Kokomo, IN

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Haynes International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 20132015 and 2012,2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2013.2015. We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013,2015, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Haynes International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2013


Table of Contents

2015 and 2012,2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2013,2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013,2015, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Indianapolis, IN

November 21, 201319, 2015


52


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SHEET
S

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30, 

    

September 30, 

 


 September 30,
2012
 September 30,
2013
 

 

2014

 

2015

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $46,740 $68,326 

 

$

45,871

 

$

49,045

 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,249 and $1,199 respectively

 100,631 82,562 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $861 and $869 respectively

 

 

72,439

 

 

75,593

 

Inventories

 263,236 232,157 

 

 

254,027

 

 

247,836

 

Income taxes receivable

 4,153 4,433 

 

 

3,235

 

 

3,699

 

Deferred income taxes

 9,933 6,018 

 

 

6,297

 

 

6,295

 

Other current assets

 1,532 2,408 

 

 

2,964

 

 

2,974

 

     

Total current assets

 426,225 395,904 

 

 

384,833

 

 

385,442

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 124,652 152,764 

 

 

174,083

 

 

185,351

 

Deferred income taxes—long term portion

 68,255 41,301 

 

 

44,639

 

 

53,958

 

Prepayments and deferred charges

 1,777 2,282 

 

 

2,031

 

 

1,877

 

Goodwill

 

 

 —

 

 

4,789

 

Other intangible assets, net

 6,017 5,601 

 

 

5,185

 

 

6,774

 

     

Total assets

 $626,926 $597,852 

 

$

610,771

 

$

638,191

 

     

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 $37,471 $27,600 

 

$

41,957

 

$

29,386

 

Accrued expenses

 15,157 13,676 

 

 

13,213

 

 

16,576

 

Revolving credit facility

   

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 21,065 4,918 

 

 

4,572

 

 

4,965

 

Deferred revenue—current portion

 2,500 2,500 

 

 

2,500

 

 

2,500

 

     

Total current liabilities

 76,193 48,694 

 

 

62,242

 

 

53,427

 

Long-term obligations (less current portion)

 980 767 

 

 

745

 

 

4,574

 

Deferred revenue (less current portion)

 32,829 30,329 

 

 

27,829

 

 

25,329

 

Non-current income taxes payable

 339  

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 215,487 162,259 
     

Accrued pension benefits

 

 

72,315

 

 

107,208

 

Accrued postretirement benefits

 

 

100,910

 

 

105,664

 

Total liabilities

 325,828 242,049 

 

 

264,041

 

 

296,202

 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)

   

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stockholders' equity:

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized, 12,287,790 and 12,342,585 shares issued and 12,287,790 and 12,332,592 outstanding at September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2013, respectively)

 12 12 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized, 12,434,748 and 12,467,498 shares issued and 12,418,471 and 12,446,000 outstanding at September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2015, respectively)

 

 

12

 

 

12

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value (20,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding)

   

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Additional paid-in capital

 236,751 238,941 

 

 

242,387

 

 

244,488

 

Accumulated earnings

 163,426 174,154 

 

 

166,999

 

 

186,533

 

Treasury stock, 0 shares at September 30, 2012 and 9,993 shares at September 30, 2013

  (505)

Treasury stock, 16,277 shares at September 30, 2014 and 21,498 shares at September 30, 2015

 

 

(840)

 

 

(1,091)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 (99,091) (56,799)

 

 

(61,828)

 

 

(87,953)

 

     

Total stockholders' equity

 301,098 355,803 
     

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $626,926 $597,852 
     

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

346,730

 

 

341,989

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

610,771

 

$

638,191

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


53


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

OPERATION
S

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 


 Year Ended
September 30,
2011
 Year Ended
September 30,
2012
 Year Ended
September 30,
2013
 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Net revenues

 $542,896 $579,561 $482,746 

$

482,746

 

$

455,410

 

$

487,635

 

Cost of sales

 449,116 458,721 409,120 

 

409,120

 

 

408,112

 

 

393,971

 

       

Gross profit

 93,780 120,840 73,626 

 

73,626

 

 

47,298

 

 

93,664

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 41,215 40,661 38,165 

 

38,165

 

 

38,693

 

 

42,572

 

Research and technical expense

 3,259 3,285 3,505 

 

3,505

 

 

3,556

 

 

3,598

 

       

Operating income

 49,306 76,894 31,956 

 

31,956

 

 

5,049

 

 

47,494

 

Interest income

 (248) (188) (114)

 

(114)

 

 

(139)

 

 

(94)

 

Interest expense

 156 87 72 

 

72

 

 

68

 

 

412

 

       

Income before income taxes

 49,398 76,995 31,998 

 

31,998

 

 

5,120

 

 

47,176

 

Provision for income taxes

 18,270 26,813 10,421 

 

10,421

 

 

1,369

 

 

16,690

 

       

Net income

 $31,128 $50,182 $21,577 

$

21,577

 

$

3,751

 

$

30,486

 

       

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 $2.55 $4.09 $1.75 

$

1.75

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

Diluted

 $2.54 $4.07 $1.74 

$

1.74

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

Dividends declared per common share

 $0.80 $0.88 $0.88 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.88

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


54


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(LOSS
)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 


 Year Ended
September 30,
2011
 Year Ended
September 30,
2012
 Year Ended
September 30,
2013
 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Net income

 $31,128 $50,182 $21,577 

 

$

21,577

 

$

3,751

 

$

30,486

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement

 (17,656) (16,741) 41,280 

 

 

41,280

 

 

(4,038)

 

 

(21,958)

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 645 698 1,012 

 

 

1,012

 

 

(991)

 

 

(4,167)

 

       

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 (17,011) (16,043) 42,292 

 

 

42,292

 

 

(5,029)

 

 

(26,125)

 

       

Comprehensive income

 $14,117 $34,139 $63,869 
       

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

63,869

 

$

(1,278)

 

$

4,361

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


55


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUIT
Y

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Common Stock  
  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 


 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accumulated
Earnings
 Treasury
Stock
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 


 Shares ParAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Treasury

 

Comprehensive

 

Stockholders’

 

Balance September 30, 2010

 12,144,079 $12 $229,197 $102,677 $ $(66,037)$265,849
              

Net income

       31,128     31,128 

Dividends paid ($0.80 per share)

       (9,758)     (9,758)

Other comprehensive loss

           (17,011) (17,011)

Exercise of stock options

 28,400   872       872 

Tax impact of forfeited vested options

     (10)       (10)

Tax impact of dividends on restricted stock

     31       31 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 31,700             

Stock compensation

     1,752       1,752 
               

Balance September 30, 2011

 12,204,179 $12 $231,842 $124,047 $ $(83,048)$272,853 
               

Net income

       50,182     50,182 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

       (10,803)     (10,803)

Other comprehensive loss

           (16,043) (16,043)

Exercise of stock options

 77,611   2,782       2,782 

Tax impact of dividends on restricted stock

     48       48 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 6,000             

Stock compensation

     2,079       2,079 
               

    

Shares

    

Par

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Stock

    

Income (Loss)

    

Equity

 

Balance September 30, 2012

 12,287,790 $12 $236,751 $163,426 $ $(99,091)$301,098 

 

12,287,790

 

$

12

 

$

236,751

 

$

163,426

 

$

 —

 

$

(99,091)

 

$

301,098

 

               

Net income

       21,577     21,577 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,577

 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

       (10,849)     (10,849)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,849)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,849)

 

Other comprehensive income

           42,292 42,292 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,292

 

 

42,292

 

Exercise of stock options

 30,545   1,092       1,092 

 

30,545

 

 

 

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,092

 

Tax impact of forfeited vested options

     (185)       (185)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(185)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(185)

 

Tax impact of dividends on restricted stock

     29       29 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 24,250            

 

24,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 (9,993)       (505)   (505)

 

(9,993)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(505)

 

 

 

 

 

(505)

 

Stock compensation

     1,254       1,254 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,254

 

               

Balance September 30, 2013

 12,332,592 $12 $238,941 $174,154 $(505)$(56,799)$355,803 

 

12,332,592

 

$

12

 

$

238,941

 

$

174,154

 

$

(505)

 

$

(56,799)

 

$

355,803

 

               

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,751

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,751

 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,906)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,906)

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,029)

 

 

(5,029)

 

Exercise of stock options

 

54,913

 

 

 

 

 

1,519

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,519

 

Tax impact of dividends on restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

158

 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

37,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(6,284)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(335)

 

 

 

 

 

(335)

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,769

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,769

 

Balance September 30, 2014

 

12,418,471

 

$

12

 

$

242,387

 

$

166,999

 

$

(840)

 

$

(61,828)

 

$

346,730

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,486

 

Dividends paid ($0.88 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,952)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,952)

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(26,125)

 

 

(26,125)

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Tax impact of forfeited vested options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28)

 

Tax impact of vesting and dividends on restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55)

 

Issue restricted stock (less forfeitures)

 

32,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(5,221)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(251)

 

 

 

 

 

(251)

 

Stock compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,184

 

Balance September 30, 2015

 

12,446,000

 

$

12

 

$

244,488

 

$

186,533

 

$

(1,091)

 

$

(87,953)

 

$

341,989

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


56


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FLOW
S

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 


 Year Ended
September 30,
2011
 Year Ended
September 30,
2012
 Year Ended
September 30,
2013
 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 $31,128 $50,182 $21,577 

 

$

21,577

 

$

3,751

 

$

30,486

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 11,528 12,520 13,744 

 

 

13,744

 

 

15,861

 

 

18,997

 

Amortization

 561 423 416 

 

 

416

 

 

416

 

 

511

 

Pension and post-retirement expense—U.S. and U.K.

 11,936 15,590 16,173 

Pension and post-retirement expense - U.S. and U.K.

 

 

16,173

 

 

10,293

 

 

12,592

 

Change in long-term obligations

  (245) (153)

 

 

(153)

 

 

(22)

 

 

(498)

 

Stock compensation expense

 1,752 2,079 1,254 

 

 

1,254

 

 

1,769

 

 

2,184

 

Excess tax benefit from option exercises

 (166) (1,147) (494)

Excess tax benefit (expense) from option exercises

 

 

(494)

 

 

(614)

 

 

55

 

Deferred revenue

 (2,500) (2,500) (2,500)

 

 

(2,500)

 

 

(2,500)

 

 

(2,500)

 

Deferred income taxes

 9,044 5,658 6,171 

 

 

6,171

 

 

(1,954)

 

 

2,810

 

Loss on disposition of property

 145 203 418 

 

 

418

 

 

500

 

 

399

 

Change in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 (24,806) (12,700) 18,630 

 

 

18,630

 

 

9,893

 

 

(5,011)

 

Inventories

 (17,859) (12,326) 31,507 

 

 

31,507

 

 

(22,275)

 

 

4,073

 

Other assets

 805 1,309 (1,324)

 

 

(1,324)

 

 

(336)

 

 

117

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 17,966 (17,242) (12,165)

 

 

(12,165)

 

 

15,722

 

 

(8,685)

 

Income taxes

 (1,540) (5) 341 

 

 

341

 

 

2,522

 

 

(99)

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 (18,390) (21,018) (20,191)

 

 

(20,191)

 

 

(6,080)

 

 

(7,036)

 

       

Net cash provided by operating activities

 19,604 20,781 73,404 

 

 

73,404

 

 

26,946

 

 

48,395

 

       

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 (14,445) (25,937) (41,550)

 

 

(41,550)

 

 

(39,694)

 

 

(18,546)

 

Change in restricted cash

 110   
       

Acquisition of Leveltek - LaPorte assets

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(14,600)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 (14,335) (25,937) (41,550)

 

 

(41,550)

 

 

(39,694)

 

 

(33,146)

 

       

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid

 (9,758) (10,803) (10,849)

 

 

(10,849)

 

 

(10,906)

 

 

(10,952)

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 706 1,635 598 

 

 

598

 

 

1,063

 

 

 —

 

Payment for purchase of treasury stock

   (505)

 

 

(505)

 

 

(335)

 

 

(251)

 

Excess tax benefit from option exercises

 166 1,147 494 

 

 

494

 

 

614

 

 

(55)

 

Payment for debt issuance cost

 (330)   

Payments on long-term obligations

 (85) (123) (100)
       

Payments on long-term obligation

 

 

(100)

 

 

 —

 

 

(173)

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 (9,301) (8,144) (10,362)

 

 

(10,362)

 

 

(9,564)

 

 

(11,431)

 

       

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 126 (22) 94 

 

 

94

 

 

(143)

 

 

(644)

 

       

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:

 (3,906) (13,322) 21,586 

 

 

21,586

 

 

(22,455)

 

 

3,174

 

Cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of period

 63,968 60,062 46,740 

 

 

46,740

 

 

68,326

 

 

45,871

 

       

End of period

 $60,062 $46,740 $68,326 

 

$

68,326

 

$

45,871

 

$

49,045

 

       

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during period for:

 

Interest (net of capitalized interest)

 $33 $22 $7 

 

$

7

 

$

3

 

$

347

 

       

Income taxes paid, net

 $10,736 $21,341 $3,578 
       

Income taxes paid (net of refunds)

 

$

3,578

 

$

811

 

$

14,017

 

Capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid

 $1,539 $2,360 $2,890 

 

$

2,890

 

$

1,293

 

$

1,741

 

       

Capital lease obligation incurred

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,500

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


57


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STATEMENT
S

(in thousands, except share and per share data and as otherwise noted)

Note 1  Background and Organization

Description of Business

Haynes International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company” or "Haynes"“Haynes”) develops, manufactures, markets and distributes technologically advanced, high-performance alloys primarily for use in the aerospace, land-based gas turbine and chemical processing industries. The Company'sCompany’s products are high-temperature resistant alloys ("HTA"(“HTA”) and corrosion-resistant alloys ("CRA"(“CRA”). The Company'sCompany’s HTA products are used by manufacturers of equipment that is subjected to extremely high temperatures, such as jet engines for the aerospace industry, gas turbine engines for power generation, waste incineration and industrial heating equipment. The Company'sCompany’s CRA products are used in applications that require resistance to extreme corrosion, such as chemical processing, power plant emissions control and hazardous waste treatment. The Company produces its high-performance alloys primarily in sheet, coil and plate forms. In addition, the Company produces its products as seamless and welded tubulars, and in slab, bar, billets and wire forms.

High-performance alloys are characterized by highly engineered often proprietary, metallurgical formulations primarily of nickel, cobalt and other metals with complex physical properties. The complexity of the manufacturing process for high-performance alloys is reflected in the Company'sCompany’s relatively high average selling price per pound, compared to the average selling price of other metals, such as carbon steel sheet, stainless steel sheet and aluminum. The high-performance alloy industry has significant barriers to entry such as the combination of (i) demanding end-user specifications, (ii) a multi-stage manufacturing process and (iii) the technical sales, marketing and manufacturing expertise required to develop new applications.

Note 2  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

A.Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Haynes International, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated. The Company has manufacturing facilities in Kokomo, Indiana; Mountain Home, North Carolina; and Arcadia, Louisiana with distribution service centers in Lebanon, Indiana; LaPorte, Indiana; LaMirada, California; Houston, Texas; Windsor, Connecticut; Openshaw, England; Lenzburg, Switzerland; Shanghai, China; and sales offices in Paris, France; Zurich, Switzerland; Singapore; Milan, Italy; Chennai, India; and Tokyo, Japan.

B.Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments, including investments with original maturities of three months or less at acquisition, to be cash equivalents, the carrying value of which approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these investments.

C.Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company markets its products to a diverse customer base, both in the United States of America and overseas. Trade credit is extended based upon evaluation of each customer'scustomer’s ability to perform its obligation, which is updated periodically. The Company purchases credit insurance for certain foreign trade receivables.


58


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

D.Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when collectability is reasonably assured and when title passes to the customer, which is generally at the time of shipment with freight terms of FOBfree on board (FOB) shipping point or at a foreign port for certain export customers. Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a component of net sales in the periods in which the related sales are recognized. The Company determines this allowance based on historical experience. Additionally, the Company recognizes revenue attributable to an up-front fee received from Titanium Metals Corporation ("TIMET")(TIMET) as a result of a twenty-year agreement, entered into on November, 17, 2006 to provide conversion services to TIMET. See Note 15 Deferred Revenue for a description of accounting treatment relating to this up-front fee.

E.Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost of inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO")(FIFO) method. The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market or scrap value, if applicable, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions.

F.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company has goodwill, patents, trademarks, customer relationships and other intangibles. As the patents and customer relationships have a definite life, they are amortized over lives ranging from two to fourteensixteen years. The Company reviews patents and customer relationships for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a patentan asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the patent asset isassets are measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.

        As theGoodwill and trademarks have an indefinite life, the Company tests them(indefinite lived) are tested for impairment at least annually as of January 31 for Goodwill and August 31 for trademarks (the annual impairment testing date).dates), or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. If the carrying value of the trademarks exceeds the fair value (determined by calculating a fair valueusing an income approach, based upon a discounted cash flow of an assumed royalty rate), impairment of the trademark may exist resulting in a charge to earnings to the extent of the impairment. The impairment test for goodwill is performed using a two-step approach.  The first step is the estimation of the fair value of the reporting unit, which is compared to its respective carrying value.  If step one indicates that impairment potentially exists, the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment, if any.  Goodwill impairment exists when the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.  No impairment was recognized in the years ended September 30, 20122014 or 20132015 because the fair value exceeded the carrying values. The

On January 7, 2015, the Company hasacquired the assets and operations of Leveltek Processing, LLC in LaPorte, Indiana for $14.6 million in cash (See Note 19, Acquisition).  In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $4,789 and customer relationships intangible assets of $2,100.  As the customer relationships have a non-compete agreement withdefinite life, the Company amortizes them over a remaining lifeperiod of 2 years.


Tablesixteen years under an accelerated method and tests them for impairment at least annually as of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)August 31 (the annual impairment testing date). 

 

The following represents the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the period ended September 30, 2015.

Goodwill at September 30, 2014

$

 —

Goodwill acquired - Leveltek-LaPorte Assets

4,789

Adjustments

 —

Goodwill at September 30, 2015

$

4,789

Amortization of the patents, non-competes, customer relationships and other intangibles was $561, $423$416, $416 and $416$511 for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. The following represents a summary of intangible assets at September 30, 20122014 and 2013:2015:

59

September 30, 2012
 Gross
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Carrying
Amount
 

Patents

 $8,667 $(6,891)$1,776 

Trademarks

  3,800    3,800 

Non-compete

  1,090  (900) 190 

Other

  330  (79) 251 
        

 $13,887 $(7,870)$6,017 
        

Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Gross

    

Accumulated

    

Carrying

 

September 30, 2014

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

Patents

 

$

4,030

 

$

(2,813)

 

$

1,217

 

Trademarks

 

 

3,800

 

 

 —

 

 

3,800

 

Non-compete

 

 

500

 

 

(452)

 

 

48

 

Other

 

 

330

 

 

(210)

 

 

120

 

 

 

$

8,660

 

$

(3,475)

 

$

5,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2013
 Gross
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Carrying
Amount
 

    

Gross

    

Accumulated

    

Carrying

 

September 30, 2015

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

Patents

 $4,030 $(2,533)$1,497 

 

$

4,030

 

$

(3,091)

 

$

939

 

Trademarks

 3,800  3,800 

 

 

3,800

 

 

 —

 

 

3,800

 

Non-compete

 500 (381) 119 

Customer relationships

 

 

2,100

 

 

(119)

 

 

1,981

 

Other

 330 (145) 185 

 

 

330

 

 

(276)

 

 

54

 

       

 

$

10,260

 

$

(3,486)

 

$

6,774

 

 $8,660 $(3,059)$5,601 
       

 

 

 

 

 

Estimate of Aggregate Amortization Expense:

    

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

489

 

2017

 

431

 

2018

 

427

 

2019

 

246

 

2020

 

140

 

Thereafter

 

1,242

 

Estimate of Aggregate Amortization Expense:
Year Ended September 30,
  
 

2014

  416 

2015

  393 

2016

  332 

2017

  279 

2018

  279 

Thereafter

  102 

G.Property, Plant and Equipment

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost with depreciation calculated primarily by using the straight-line method based on estimated economic useful lives which are generally as follows:

Building and improvements

40 years

Machinery and equipment

5-14 years

Office equipment and computer software

3-10 years

Land improvements

20 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building and improvements

 

 

 

40

 years

 

Machinery and equipment

 

5

14

 years

 

Office equipment and computer software

 

3

10

 years

 

Land improvements

 

 

 

20

 years

 

 

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs and minor renewals are charged to expense; major renewals are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale of assets, the cost of the disposed assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to operations.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The Company records capitalized interest for long-term construction projects to capture the cost of capital committed prior to the placed in service date as a part of the historical cost of acquiring the asset. Interest is not capitalized when balance on the revolver is zero.

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. There was no triggering event during the years ended September 30, 20122014 or 20132015 and thus no impairment was recognized.

60


H.Environmental Remediation

When it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset of the Company has been impaired, a loss is recognized assuming the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The measurement of environmental liabilities by the Company is based on currently available facts, present laws and regulations and current technology. Such estimates take into consideration the expected costs of post-closure monitoring based on historical experience.

I.Pension and Postretirement Benefits

The Company has defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering most of its current and former employees. Significant elements in determining the assets or liabilities and related income or expense for these plans are the expected return on plan assets, the discount rate used to value future payment streams, expected trends in health care costs, and other actuarial assumptions. Annually, the Company evaluates the significant assumptions to be used to value its pension and postretirement plan assets and liabilities based on current market conditions and expectations of future costs. If actual results are less favorable than those projected by management, additional expense may be required in future periods. Salaried employees hired after December 31, 2005 and hourly employees hired after June 30, 2007 are not covered by the pension plan; however, they are eligible for an enhanced matching program of the defined contribution plan (401(k)). Effective December 31, 2007, the U.S. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for all non-union employees in the U.S. Effective September 30, 2009, the U.K. pension plan was amended to freeze benefits for employees in the plan. Effective January 1, 2007 a plan amendment of the postretirement medical plan caps the Company'sCompany’s liability related to retiree health care costs at $5,000 annually.

J.Foreign Currency Exchange

The Company'sCompany’s foreign operating entities'entities’ financial statements are denominated in the functional currencies of each respective country, which are the local currencies. All assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of the year, and revenues and expenses are translated at the weighted average rate for the year. Translation gains or losses are recorded as a separate component of comprehensive income (loss) and transaction gains and losses are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

K.Research and Technical Costs

Research and technical costs related to the development of new products and processes are expensed as incurred. Research and technical costs for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 20132015 were $3,259, $3,285$3,505, $3,556 and $3,505,$3,598, respectively.

L.Income Taxes

The Company accounts for deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of whether or not a valuation allowance is needed is based upon an evaluation of both positive and negative evidence. In its evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance, the Company utilizes prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The ultimate amount of deferred tax assets realized could be different from those recorded, as influenced by potential changes in enacted tax laws and the availability of future taxable income. The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) it is determined whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.

61


M.Stock Based Compensation

Restricted Stock Plan

On February 23, 2009, the Company adopted a restricted stock plan that reserved 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance. Grants of restricted stock are shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock subject to transfer restrictions, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may set restrictions on certain grants based on the achievement of specific performance goals and vesting of grants to participants will also be time-based.

Restricted stock grants are subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates prior to the end of the vesting period or if the performance goals are not met, if applicable. The Company will assess, on an ongoing basis, the probability of whether the performance criteria will be achieved. The Company will recognize compensation expense over the performance period if it is deemed probable that the goals will be achieved. The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s restricted stock is determined based upon the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock on the grant date. The plan provides for the adjustment of the number of shares covered by an outstanding grant and the maximum number of shares for which restricted stock may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event.

Stock Option Plans

The Company has two stock option plans that authorize the granting of non-qualified stock options to certain key employees and non-employee directors for the purchase of a maximum of 1,500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. The original option plan was adopted in August 2004 pursuant to the plan


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

of reorganization and provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. In January 2007, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors adopted a second option plan that provides for options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. Each plan provides for the adjustment of the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, options granted under the option plans are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant and vest 331/3% per year over three years from the grant date. The amount of compensation cost recognized in the financial statement is measured based upon the grant date fair value. The fair value of the option grants is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with assumptions on dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, expected volatilities, expected forfeiture rate and expected lives of the options.

N.Financial Instruments and Concentrations of Risk

The Company may periodically enter into forward currency exchange contracts to minimize the variability in the Company'sCompany’s operating results arising from foreign exchange rate movements. The Company does not engage in foreign currency speculation. At September 30, 20122014 and 2013,2015, the Company had no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. At September 30, 2013,2015, and periodically throughout the year, the Company has maintained cash balances in excess of federally insured limits. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

During 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, the Company did not have sales to any group of affiliated customers that were greater than 10% of net revenues. The Company generally does not require collateral with the exception of letters of credit with certain foreign sales. Credit losses have been within management'smanagement’s expectations. In addition, the Company purchases credit insurance for certain foreign trade receivables. The Company does not believe it is significantly vulnerable to the risk of near-term severe impact from business concentrations with respect to customers, suppliers, products, markets or geographic areas.

62


O.Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, income taxes, asset impairment, retirement benefits, and environmental matters. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, pension asset mix and in some cases, actuarial techniques, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The Company


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

routinely reevaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

P.Earnings Per Share

The Company accounts for earnings per share using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation that determines net income per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to participation rights in undistributed earnings. Non-vested restricted stock awards that include non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities. Per share amounts are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each period. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.

63


Basic and diluted net income per share were computed as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended September 30,

 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Numerator: Basic and Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

21,577

 

$

3,751

 

$

30,486

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(10,849)

 

 

(10,906)

 

 

(10,952)

 

Undistributed income (loss)

 

 

10,728

 

 

(7,155)

 

 

19,534

 

Percentage allocated to common shares

 

 

99.1

%

 

99.2

%

 

99.1

%

Undistributed income (loss) allocated to common shares

 

 

10,637

 

 

(7,098)

 

 

19,358

 

Dividends paid on common shares outstanding

 

 

10,754

 

 

10,819

 

 

10,853

 

Net income available to common shares

 

 

21,391

 

 

3,721

 

 

30,211

 

Denominator: Basic and Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

12,223,838

 

 

12,291,881

 

 

12,331,805

 

Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares

 

 

41,792

 

 

29,819

 

 

12,404

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted

 

 

12,265,630

 

 

12,321,700

 

 

12,344,209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income per share

 

$

1.75

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

Diluted net income per share

 

$

1.74

 

$

0.30

 

$

2.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of stock option shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

 

 

170,623

 

 

180,435

 

 

289,130

 

Number of restrictive stock shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

 

 

106,575

 

 

98,463

 

 

111,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Percentage allocated to common shares - weighted average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares outstanding

 

 

12,223,838

 

 

12,291,881

 

 

12,331,805

 

Unvested participating shares

 

 

106,575

 

 

98,463

 

 

112,275

 

 

 

 

12,330,413

 

 

12,390,344

 

 

12,444,080

 

 
 Years ended September 30, 
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
 2011 2012 2013 

Numerator:

          

Net income

 $31,128 $50,182 $21,577 

Less amount allocable to participating securities

  (320) (454) (186)
        

Net income available for basic shareholders

  30,808  49,728  21,391 

Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares

  (2) 2   
        

Net income available for diluted common shares

 $30,806 $49,730 $21,391 
        

Denominator:

          

Weighted average shares—Basic

  12,067,555  12,147,179  12,223,838 

Adjustment for dilutive potential common shares          

  82,311  68,852  41,792 
        

Weighted average shares—Diluted

  12,149,866  12,216,031  12,265,630 
        

Basic net income per share

 $2.55 $4.09 $1.75 

Diluted net income per share

 $2.54 $4.07 $1.74 

Number of stock option shares excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive

  130,195  98,630  170,623 

Q.Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-02,ASU 2014-09, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeRevenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The standard revisesobjective of the guidanceupdate is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for providing information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income.those goods or services. It becameis effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect, if any, on its financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).  The objective of the update is to set forth the definition of a derivative instrument and specify how to account for such instruments, including derivatives embedded in hybrid instruments.  In addition, this update establishes when reporting entities, in certain limited, well-defined circumstances, may apply hedge accounting to a relationship involving a designated hedging instrument and hedged exposure.  It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period.  This update is not expected to result in a material impact to the consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures. 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330).  The objective of this update was to simplify the measurement of inventory valuation at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation.  It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012.2017.  The Company adopted this accounting standardadoption of these changes is not expected to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

64


In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Interest – Imputation of interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.  In August 2015, the FASB clarified ASU 2015-15 to address presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements.  This amendment allows for the reporting entity to defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortize the debt issuance costs over the term of the line-of-credit agreement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on January 1, 2013, and the line-of-credit arrangement, including interim periods within that reporting period.  This update is not expected to result in a material impact to the consolidated financial statements was not material. See Note 17 for disclosure of amounts reclassified out of accumulated comprehensive income.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 2    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)or the related disclosures.

R.Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in equity that result from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. See Note 17 for a breakdown of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss net of tax effects.

Note 3  Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost of inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO"(“FIFO”) method. The following is a summary of the major classes of inventories:

 

 

 

 

 

 


 September 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

September 30, 


 2012 2013 

    

2014

    

2015

Raw materials

 $27,654 $25,647 

Raw Materials

 

$

25,050

 

$

27,152

Work-in-process

 129,642 108,708 

 

 

144,285

 

 

117,601

Finished goods

 104,875 97,150 

Finished Goods

 

 

83,674

 

 

101,731

Other

 1,065 652 

 

 

1,018

 

 

1,352
     

 

$

254,027

 

$

247,836

 $263,236 $232,157 
     

Note 4  Property, Plant and Equipment

The following is a summary of the major classes of property, plant and equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 September 30, 

 

September 30,

 


 2012 2013 

    

2014

    

2015

 

Land and land improvements

 $6,415 $6,856 

 

$

6,785

 

$

6,992

 

Buildings

 17,178 19,034 

 

 

24,750

 

 

36,326

 

Machinery and equipment

 154,670 179,407 

 

 

213,834

 

 

251,701

 

Construction in process

 17,355 31,472 

 

 

27,635

 

 

7,400

 

     

 

 

273,004

 

 

302,419

 

 195,618 236,769 

Less accumulated depreciation

 (70,966) (84,005)

 

 

(98,921)

 

 

(117,068)

 

     

 

$

174,083

 

$

185,351

 

 $124,652 $152,764 
     

 

The Company has $903$368 of assets under a capital lease for equipment related to the service center operation in Shanghai, China.China and $4,331 of assets under capital lease for a building at the La Porte, Indiana service center. 


65



HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 5  Accrued Expenses

The following is a summary of the major classes of accrued expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 September 30, 

 

September 30,

 


 2012 2013 

    

2014

    

2015

 

Employee compensation

 $8,355 $6,415 

 

$

6,750

 

$

10,935

 

Advance payments from customers

 1,868 1,094 

Taxes, other than income taxes

 2,566 3,005 

 

 

2,631

 

 

2,815

 

Utilities

 

 

1,165

 

 

971

 

Professional Fees

 

 

696

 

 

583

 

Capital lease obligation, current

 

 

 —

 

 

468

 

Other

 2,368 3,162 

 

 

1,971

 

 

804

 

     

 

$

13,213

 

$

16,576

 

 $15,157 $13,676 
     

Note 6  Income Taxes

The components of income before provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Income before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

23,555

 

$

(360)

 

$

36,327

 

Foreign

 

 

8,443

 

 

5,480

 

 

10,849

 

Total

 

$

31,998

 

$

5,120

 

$

47,176

 

Provision for income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

$

2,125

 

$

427

 

$

11,207

 

Foreign

 

 

1,419

 

 

1,012

 

 

1,690

 

State

 

 

85

 

 

541

 

 

686

 

Total

 

 

3,629

 

 

1,980

 

 

13,583

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

 

5,907

 

 

(983)

 

 

(79)

 

Foreign

 

 

623

 

 

302

 

 

690

 

State

 

 

262

 

 

70

 

 

2,368

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

128

 

Total

 

 

6,792

 

 

(611)

 

 

3,107

 

Total provision for income taxes

 

$

10,421

 

$

1,369

 

$

16,690

 

66

 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2011 2012 2013 

Income before income taxes:

          

U.S. 

 $44,244 $67,968 $23,555 

Foreign

  5,154  9,027  8,443 
        

Total

 $49,398 $76,995 $31,998 
        

Provision for income taxes:

          

Current:

          

U.S. Federal

 $5,952 $15,836 $2,125 

Foreign

  2,145  1,712  1,419 

State

  825  2,079  85 
        

Total

  8,922  19,627  3,629 
        

Deferred:

          

U.S. Federal

  7,411  6,314  5,907 

Foreign

  (685) 585  623 

State

  2,308  601  262 

Valuation allowance

  314  (314) 0 
        

Total

  9,348  7,186  6,792 
        

Total provision for income taxes

 $18,270 $26,813 $10,421 
        


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 6    Income Taxes (Continued)

The provision for income taxes applicable to results of operations differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Year Ended September 30, 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 


 2011 2012 2013 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Statutory federal tax rate

 35% 35% 35%

 

 

35

%  

 

35

%  

 

35

%  

Tax provision for income taxes at the statutory rate

 $17,289 $26,949 $11,199 

 

$

11,199

 

$

1,792

 

$

16,512

 

Foreign tax rate differentials

 (342) (864) (913)

 

 

(913)

 

 

(605)

 

 

(1,417)

 

Provision for state taxes, net of federal taxes

 1,289 1,578 473 

 

 

473

 

 

230

 

 

818

 

U.S. tax on distributed and undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries

  335 354 

 

 

354

 

 

173

 

 

419

 

Manufacturer's deduction

 (910) (1,715) (217)

Manufacturer’s deduction

 

 

(217)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,213)

 

Tax credits

 (713)  (78)

 

 

(78)

 

 

(91)

 

 

(240)

 

State tax rate reduction impact on deferred tax asset

 1,228 89 (182)

State tax rate change impact on deferred tax asset

 

 

(182)

 

 

157

 

 

1,565

 

Change in Valuation Allowance

 314 (314)  

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

128

 

Other, net

 115 755 (215)

 

 

(215)

 

 

(287)

 

 

118

 

       

Provision for income taxes at effective tax rate

 $18,270 $26,813 $10,421 

 

$

10,421

 

$

1,369

 

$

16,690

 

       

Effective tax rate

 37.0% 34.8% 32.6%

 

 

32.6

%  

 

26.7

%  

 

35.4

%  

 

During fiscal 2011,2013, the Company's effective tax rate was higher, primarily due to the revaluation of the Company's deferred tax assets at a lower blended state income tax rate, offset by additional tax credits.

        During fiscal 2012, the Company'sCompany’s effective tax rate was lower primarily due to increased proportion of profitability in foreign jurisdictions andthan the increased Manufacturer's deduction (due to increased U.S. profitability).

        During fiscal 2013, the Company's effective taxstatutory rate, was lower, primarily due to increased proportion of profitability in foreign jurisdictions and the reversal of certain tax reserves no longer required.


TableDuring fiscal 2014, the Company’s effective tax rate was lower than the statutory rate, primarily due to a higher proportion of Contentsincome in lower tax jurisdictions.  The Company generated a taxable loss in the United States, which will be carried back to earlier years.  


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
During fiscal 2015, the Company’s effective tax rate was higher than the statutory rate, primarily due to a change in the Indiana tax law that was enacted in May, 2015, which decreased the deferred tax asset and increased tax expense. 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 6    Income Taxes (Continued)

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2014

    

2015

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement benefits

 

$

63,124

 

$

77,076

 

TIMET Agreement

 

 

11,200

 

 

10,024

 

Inventories

 

 

2,662

 

 

3,771

 

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

 

1,606

 

 

2,027

 

Accrued expenses and other

 

 

2,093

 

 

2,085

 

Tax attributes

 

 

1,385

 

 

778

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 —

 

 

(128)

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

$

82,070

 

$

95,633

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

(29,789)

 

$

(34,109)

 

Intangible and other

 

 

(1,345)

 

 

(1,271)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

$

(31,134)

 

$

(35,380)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 

$

50,936

 

$

60,253

 

Current deferred tax assets

 

$

6,297

 

$

6,295

 

Long-term deferred tax asset

 

$

44,639

 

$

53,958

 

As of September 30, 2015, the Company has state tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $24, tax credits of $778 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $483. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has state tax net operating loss of approximately $5,013, tax credits of $606 and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $1,259.

67

 
 September 30, 
 
 2012 2013 

Deferred tax assets:

       

Pension and postretirement benefits

 $83,379 $58,148 

TIMET Agreement

  13,071  12,167 

Inventories

  2,996  2,095 

Accrued compensation and benefits

  4,055  3,076 

Accrued expenses and other

  1,772  527 

Tax attributes

  740  946 
      

Total deferred tax assets

 $106,013 $76,959 
      

Deferred tax liabilities:

       

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $(25,665)$(26,931)

Intangible and other

  (2,160) (2,709)
      

 $(27,825)$(29,640)

Valuation Allowance

     
      

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 $78,188 $47,319 
      

Current deferred tax assets

 $9,933 $6,018 
      

Long-term deferred tax asset

 $68,255 $41,301 
      

 

The Company has tax attributes of $740 and $946 for the fiscal years 2012 and 2013, respectively, which include foreign and state operating loss carryforwards. During fiscal year 2012, the Company reversednot recorded a valuation allowance against $314 of foreign losses. Some tax attributes expire beginning in 2024 and others have nothe loss carryforwards because management believes that it is more likely than not that net operating loss carryforwards will be realized prior to their expiration.

Undistributed earnings of certain of our foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $52,343$55,037 at September 30, 2013.2015. The Company considers those earnings reinvested indefinitely and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. income taxes has been provided. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 6    Income Taxes (Continued)

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

October 1, 2012 To

    

October 1, 2013 To

    

October 1, 2014 To

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 


 October 1, 2009 To
September 30,
2011
 October 1, 2010 To
September 30,
2012
 October 1, 2011 To
September 30,
2013
 

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Balance at beginning of period

 $264 $264 $264 

 

$

264

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Gross Increases—current period tax positions

    

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross Decreases—current period tax positions

    

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross Increases—tax positions in prior periods

    

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross Decreases—tax positions in prior periods

    

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross Decreases—settlements with taxing authorities

    

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross Decreases—lapse of statute of limitations

   (264)

 

 

(264)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

       

Balance at end of period

 $264 $264 $ 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

       

 

During fiscal year 2013, the Company recognized the tax benefits previously unrecognized due to the statute of limitations. This tax benefit was recorded in income tax expense and affected the income statement by $236. During fiscal 2013, the Company recognized a reversal of accrued interest expense related to the unrecognized tax benefits totaling $75.

As of September 30, 2013,2015, the Company is open to examination in the U.S. federal income tax jurisdiction for the 20102011 through 20132015 tax years and in various foreign jurisdictions from 20082009 through 2013.2015. The Company is also open to examination in various states in the U.S., none of which were individually material.

Note 7  Debt

The Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC ("(“Wells Fargo"), successor by merger to Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation (Central) ("Wachovia"Fargo”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the "Amended Agreement"“Amended Agreement”) with certain other lenders with an effective date of July 14, 2011. The maximum revolving loan amount under the Amended Agreement is $120.0 million, subject to a borrowing base formula and certain reserves.reserves that could limit the Company’s borrowing to approximately $105.0 million. The Amended Agreement permits an increase in the maximum revolving loan amount from $120.0 million up to an aggregate amount of $170.0 million at the request of the borrowers.Company. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility bear interest at the Company'sCompany’s option at either Wells Fargo's "prime rate"Fargo’s “prime rate”, plus up to 0.75% per annum, or the adjusted Eurodollar rate used by the lender, plus up to 2.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013,2015, the U.S. revolving credit facility had an outstanding balance of zero. In addition, the Company must pay monthly in arrears a commitment fee of 0.25% per annum on the unused amount of the U.S. revolving credit facility total commitment. For letters of credit, the Company must pay 1.5% per annum on the daily outstanding balance of all issued letters of credit, plus customary fees for issuance, amendments and processing. The Company is subject to certain covenants as to fixed charge coverage ratios and other customary covenants, including covenants restricting the incurrence of indebtedness, the granting of liens and the sale of assets. The covenant pertaining to fixed charge coverage ratios is only effective in the event the amount of excess availability under the revolver is less than 12.5% of the maximum credit revolving amount.  The Company is permitted to pay dividends and repurchase common stock if certain


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 7    Debt (Continued)

financial metrics are met (which do not apply in the case of dividends less than $20.0 million in the aggregate in a year and repurchases in connection with the vesting of shares of restricted stock). As of September 30, 2013,2015, the most recent required measurement date under the Amended Agreement, management believes that the Company was in compliance with those covenants.all applicable financial covenants under the Amended Agreement. The U.S. revolving credit facility matures on July 14, 2016. Borrowings under the U.S. revolving credit facility

68


are collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the U.S. assets of the Company, including the equity interests in its U.S. subsidiaries, but excluding the four-high Steckel rolling mill and related assets, which are pledged to Titanium Metals Corporation to secure the performance of the Company'sCompany’s obligations under a Conversion Services Agreement with TIMET (see discussion of TIMET at Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The U.S. revolving credit facility is also secured by a pledge of a 65% equity interest in each of the Company'sCompany’s direct foreign subsidiaries.

        In April 2008, the Company's U.K. subsidiary (Haynes International Ltd.) put in place a facility with a multi-currency overdraft facility. The overdraft facility has a limit of 2,000 pounds sterling ($3,237). Haynes International Ltd. is required to pay interest on overdrafts in an amount equal to the Bank's Sterling Base Rate (in accordance with the terms facility), plus 2.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2013, the overdraft facility had an outstanding balance of zero.

        At September 30, 2013, the Company had access to approximately $120,000 under its credit agreement (based on borrowing base and certain reserves). The Company's UKCompany’s U.K. subsidiary (Haynes International Ltd.) has an overdraft facility of 2,000 pounds sterling ($3,237)($3,026), all of which was available on September 30, 2013.2015. The Company'sCompany’s French subsidiary (Haynes International, S.A.R.L.) has an overdraft banking facility of 1,200 Euro ($1,621)($1,344), all of which was available on September 30, 2013.2015. The Company'sCompany’s Swiss subsidiary (Haynes International AG) had an overdraft banking facility of 500 Swiss Francs ($553)($514), all of which was available on September 30, 2013.2015.

Note 8  Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan (401(k)) for substantially all U.S. employees. The Company contributes an amount equal to 50% of an employee'semployee’s contribution to the plan up to a maximum contribution of 3% of the employee'semployee’s salary, except for all salaried employees and certain hourly employees (those hired after June 30, 2007 that are not eligible for the U.S. pension plan). The Company contributes an amount equal to 60% of an employee'semployee’s contribution to the plan up to a maximum contribution of 6% of the employee'semployee’s salary for these groups. Expenses associated with this plan for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 20132015 totaled $1,237, $1,374$1,416, $1,436 and $1,416,$1,598, respectively.

The Company sponsors certain profit sharing plans for the benefit of employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. There were no contributions to these plans for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013.


2015.

Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company has non-contributory defined benefit pension plans which cover most employees in the U.S. and certain foreign subsidiaries. In the U.S. salaried employees hired after December 31, 2005 and hourly employees hired after June 30, 2007 are not covered by the pension plan; however, they are eligible for an enhanced matching program of the defined contribution plan (401(k)). On October 3, 2007,In fiscal 2008, the Company made amendments to the U.S. pension plan was amended effective December 31, 2007 to freezewhich included the freezing of benefit accruals for all non-union employees in the U.S. and effective January 1, 2008,while increasing the pension multiplier used to calculate the employee's monthly benefit was increased from 1.4% to 1.6%. In addition, the Company will make enhanced matching contributions to its 401K plan equal to 60% of the non-union and union plan participant's salary deferrals, up to 6% of compensation. As a result of freezing the benefit accruals for all non-union employees in the U.S. in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company recognized a reduction of the projected benefit obligation of $8,191, an increase to other comprehensive income (before tax) of $4,532 and a curtailment gain (before tax) of $3,659. The impact of the multiplier increase will be charged to pension expense over the estimated remaining lives of the participants.  Effective September 30, 2009, the U.K. pension plan was amended to freeze benefit accruals for members of its plan. As of September 30, 2009, the company recognized a reduction of the projected benefit obligation of $392, an increase to other comprehensive income (before tax) of $392 and zero impact on the statement of operations.

Benefits provided under the Company'sCompany’s domestic defined benefit pension plan are based on years of service and the employee'semployee’s final compensation. The Company'sCompany’s funding policy is to contribute annually an amount deductible for federal income tax purposes based upon an actuarial cost method using actuarial and economic assumptions designed to achieve adequate funding of benefit obligations.

The Company has non-qualified pensions for former executives of the Company. Non-qualified pension plan expense (income) for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 20132015 was $12, $84 $110 and $12,$140, respectively. Accrued liabilities in the amount of $909$813 and $825$858 for these benefits are included in accrued pension and postretirement benefits liability at September 30, 20122014 and 2013,2015, respectively.

In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Substantially all domestic employees become eligible for these benefits, if they reach normal retirement age while working for the Company. During March 2006, the Company communicated to employees and plan participants a negative plan amendment that caps the Company'sCompany’s liability related to total retiree health care costs at $5,000 annually effective January 1, 2007. An updated actuarial valuation was performed at March 31, 2006, which reduced the accumulated postretirement benefit liability due to this plan amendment by $46,313 that will bewas amortized as a reduction to expense over an eight year period. This amortization period began in April 2006 thus reducing the amount of expense

69


Table of Contents

recognized for the second half of fiscal 2006 and the respective future periods.periods and, as of September 30, 2015 is fully amortized.

The Company made contributions of $15,900$1,250 and $15,000$1,500 to fund its domestic Company-sponsored pension plan for the year ended September 30, 20122014 and 2013,2015, respectively. The Company'sCompany’s U.K. subsidiary made contributions of $970$975 and $909 for the years ended September 30, 20122014 and 2013,2015, respectively, to the U.K. pension plan.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)

The Company uses a September 30 measurement date for its plans. The status of employee pension benefit plans and other postretirement benefit plans are summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

 

Postretirement

 

 

 

Pension Plans

 

 

Health Care Benefits

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2014

    

2015

    

    

2014

    

2015

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

273,693

 

$

288,559

 

 

$

98,772

 

$

105,387

 

Service cost

 

 

3,971

 

 

3,898

 

 

 

267

 

 

337

 

Interest cost

 

 

11,989

 

 

11,203

 

 

 

4,578

 

 

4,385

 

Actuarial losses

 

 

12,143

 

 

21,861

 

 

 

5,614

 

 

5,097

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(13,237)

 

 

(13,578)

 

 

 

(3,844)

 

 

(4,672)

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

288,559

 

$

311,943

 

 

$

105,387

 

$

110,534

 

Change in Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

206,113

 

$

216,962

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Actual return on assets

 

 

21,861

 

 

(295)

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Employer contributions

 

 

2,225

 

 

2,409

 

 

 

3,844

 

 

4,672

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(13,237)

 

 

(13,578)

 

 

 

(3,844)

 

 

(4,672)

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

216,962

 

$

205,498

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Funded Status of Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unfunded status

 

$

(71,597)

 

$

(106,445)

 

 

$

(105,387)

 

$

(110,534)

 

 
 Defined Benefit
Pension Plans
 Postretirement
Health Care Benefits
 
 
 Year Ended
September 30,
 Year Ended
September 30,
 
 
 2012 2013 2012 2013 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

             

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 $261,953 $303,445 $101,515 $114,209 

Service cost

  4,001  4,881  291  387 

Interest cost

  11,623  10,839  4,581  4,330 

Actuarial losses

  38,147  (32,627) 11,974  (16,018)

Benefits paid

  (12,279) (12,845) (4,152) (4,136)
          

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

 $303,445 $273,693 $114,209  98,772 
          

Change in Plan Assets:

             

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 $148,931 $182,011 $ $ 

Actual return on assets

  28,489  20,977     

Employer contributions

  16,870  15,970  4,152  4,136 

Benefits paid

  (12,279) (12,845) (4,152) (4,136)
          

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 $182,011 $206,113 $ $ 
          

Funded Status of Plan:

             

Unfunded status

 $(121,434)$(67,580)$(114,209)$(98,772)
          

Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

Postretirement

 

Non-Qualified

 

All Plans

 


 Defined Benefit
Pension Plans
 Postretirement
Health Care Benefits
 Non-Qualified
Pension Plans
 All Plans
Combined
 

 

Pension Plans

 

Health Care Benefits

 

Pension Plans

 

Combined

 


 September 30, September 30, September 30, September 30, 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 


 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

    

2014

    

2015

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 $(15,970)$ $(5,000)$(4,823)$(95)$(95)$(21,065)$(4,918)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(4,477)

 

$

(4,870)

 

$

(95)

 

$

(95)

 

$

(4,572)

 

$

(4,965)

 

Non-current

 (105,464) (67,580) (109,209) (93,949) (814) (730) (215,487) (162,259)
                 

Non-current

 

 

(71,597)

 

 

(106,445)

 

 

(100,910)

 

 

(105,664)

 

 

(718)

 

 

(763)

 

 

(173,225)

 

 

(212,872)

 

Accrued pension and postretirement benefits

 $(121,434)$(67,580)$(114,209)$(98,772)$(909)$(825)$(236,552)$(167,177)

 

$

(71,597)

 

$

(106,445)

 

$

(105,387)

 

$

(110,534)

 

$

(813)

 

$

(858)

 

$

(177,797)

 

$

(217,837)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (gain) loss

 114,542 63,939 48,632 28,897   163,174 92,836 

Net loss

 

 

64,641

 

 

97,268

 

 

32,514

 

 

35,177

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

97,155

 

 

132,445

 

Prior service cost

 6,252 5,444 (8,684) (2,895)   (2,432) 2,549 

 

 

4,636

 

 

3,828

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,636

 

 

3,828

 

                 

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 $120,794 $69,383 $39,948 $26,002 $ $ $160,742 $95,385 

 

$

69,277

 

$

101,096

 

$

32,514

 

$

35,177

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

101,791

 

$

136,273

 

Amounts expected to be recognized from AOCI into the statement of operations in the following year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of net loss

 $10,189 $4,612 $3,717 $1,996 $ $ $13,906 $6,608 

 

$

4,645

 

$

8,838

 

$

2,434

 

$

2,825

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

7,079

 

$

11,663

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 808 808 (5,789) (2,895)   (4,981) (2,087)

 

 

808

 

 

808

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

808

 

 

808

 

                 

 

$

5,453

 

$

9,646

 

$

2,434

 

$

2,825

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

7,887

 

$

12,471

 

 $10,997 $5,420 $(2,072)$(899)$ $ $8,925 $4,521 
                 

 

The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $281,623$276,009 and $257,284$299,039 at September 30, 20122014 and 2013,2015, respectively.

The cost of the Company'sCompany’s postretirement benefits are accrued over the years employees provide service to the date of their full eligibility for such benefits. The Company'sCompany’s policy is to fund the cost of claims on an annual basis.

70


Table of Contents

The components of net periodic pension cost and postretirement health care benefit cost are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Service cost

 

$

4,881

 

$

3,971

 

$

3,898

 

Interest cost

 

 

10,839

 

 

11,989

 

 

11,203

 

Expected return on assets

 

 

(13,189)

 

 

(15,033)

 

 

(15,117)

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

808

 

 

808

 

 

808

 

Recognized actuarial loss

 

 

10,189

 

 

4,612

 

 

4,645

 

Net periodic cost

 

$

13,528

 

$

6,347

 

$

5,437

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement

 

 

 

Health Care Benefits

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Service cost

 

$

387

 

$

267

 

$

337

 

Interest cost

 

 

4,330

 

 

4,578

 

 

4,385

 

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost

 

 

(5,789)

 

 

(2,895)

 

 

 —

 

Recognized actuarial loss

 

 

3,717

 

 

1,996

 

 

2,433

 

Net periodic cost

 

$

2,645

 

$

3,946

 

$

7,155

 

 
 Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2011 2012 2013 

Service cost

 $3,612 $4,001 $4,881 

Interest cost

  11,383  11,623  10,839 

Expected return on assets

  (12,023) (11,755) (13,189)

Amortization of prior service cost

  808  808  808 

Recognized actuarial loss

  6,285  9,031  10,189 
        

Net periodic cost

 $10,065 $13,708 $13,528 
        

Table of Contents

Assumptions


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)


 
 Postretirement
Health Care Benefits
 
 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2011 2012 2013 

Service cost

 $266 $291 $387 

Interest cost

  4,688  4,581  4,330 

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost

  (5,789) (5,789) (5,789)

Recognized actuarial loss

  2,706  2,799  3,717 
        

Net periodic cost

 $1,871 $1,882 $2,645 
        

Assumptions

A 6.0% (6.5%-2012)5.0% (5.5%-2014) annual rate of increase for the costs of covered health care benefits for ages under 65 and a 5.0%  (5.5%-2012)(5.0%-2014) annual rate of increase for ages over 65 were assumed for 2013, gradually decreasing2015, and remaining at 5.0% for boththe under 65 and over 65 age groups to 5.0% (5.0%-2012) by the year 2016. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have no effect on the following effectstotal of service and interest cost components of pension expense in 2013:fiscal 2015 or on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of September 30, 2015.

 
 1-Percentage Point
Increase
 1-Percentage Point
Decrease
 

Effect on total of service and interest cost components

 $0 $0 

Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation

  0  0 

 

The effect on total of service and interest cost components and the effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is zero due to the plan amendment that caps the Company costs at $5,000 on an undiscounted basis per year.

The actuarial present value of the projected pension benefit obligation and postretirement health care benefit obligation for the plans at September 30, 20122014 and 20132015 were determined based on the following assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30,

    

September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2015

 

Discount rate (postretirement health care)

 

4.25

%  

4.25

%  

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)

 

4.00

%  

4.00

%  

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

 

3.90

%  

3.70

%  

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

 

3.50

%  

3.50

%  

71

 
 September 30,
2012
 September 30,
2013
 

Discount rate (postretirement health care)

  3.875% 4.750%

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)

  3.625% 4.500%

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

  4.100% 4.300%

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

  3.500% 3.500%


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)

The net periodic pension and postretirement health care benefit costs for the plans were determined using the following assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

 

Pension and

 

 

Postretirement Health

 

 

Care Plans

 


 Defined Benefit
Pension and
Postretirement Health
Care Plans
 

 

Year Ended

 


 Year Ended
September 30,
 

 

September 30,

 


 2011 2012 2013 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Discount rate (postretirement health care plan)

 4.875% 4.625% 3.875%

 

3.875

%  

4.750

%  

4.250

%  

Discount rate (U.S. pension plan)

 4.875% 4.500% 3.625%

 

3.625

%  

4.500

%  

4.000

%  

Discount rate (U.K. pension plan)

 5.000% 5.200% 4.100%

 

4.100

%  

4.300

%  

3.900

%  

Expected return on plan assets (U.S. pension plan)

 8.500% 8.000% 7.500%

 

7.500

%  

7.500

%  

7.500

%  

Expected return on plan assets (U.K. pension plan)

 5.900% 5.900% 4.200%

 

4.200

%  

4.800

%  

4.400

%  

Rate of compensation increase (U.S. pension plan only)

 3.500% 3.500% 3.500%

 

3.500

%  

3.500

%  

3.500

%  

 

In accordance with the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014, released by the Society of Actuaries in October 2014, the Company applied the new mortality assumptions which were used in the determination of the projected benefit obligation as of September 30, 2015.  These new assumptions reflected a mortality improvement that was the primary determinant in realizing actuarial losses of $21.9 million and $5.1 million in pension and postretirement plans, respectively.  These losses result in increases in the accrued pension liability, the accrued post-retirement liability, and corresponding increases in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Plan Assets and Investment Strategy

Our pension plan assets by level within the fair value hierarchy at September 30, 20122014 and 2013,2015, are presented in the table below. Our pension plan assets were accounted for at fair value. For more information on a description of the fair value hierarchy, see Note 16.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

 

    

Level 1

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Active

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

Total

 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. common stock mutual funds

 

$

41,968

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

41,968

 

Common /collective funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

 

 

 —

 

 

79,231

 

 

 —

 

 

79,231

 

U.S. common stock

 

 

 —

 

 

67,733

 

 

 —

 

 

67,733

 

International equity

 

 

 —

 

 

8,398

 

 

 —

 

 

8,398

 

Total U.S.

 

$

41,968

 

$

155,362

 

$

 —

 

$

197,330

 

U.K. Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

 —

 

$

8,329

 

$

 —

 

$

8,329

 

Bonds

 

 

 —

 

 

9,021

 

 

 —

 

 

9,021

 

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

2,282

 

 

 —

 

 

2,282

 

Total U.K.

 

$

 —

 

$

19,632

 

$

 —

 

$

19,632

 

Total pension plan assets

 

$

41,968

 

$

174,994

 

$

 —

 

$

216,962

 

72

 
 September 30, 2012 
 
 Level 1
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 Level 2
Other
Observable
Inputs
 Level 3
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 Total 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

             

U.S. common stock mutual funds

 $30,238 $ $ $30,238 

Common /collective funds

             

Bonds

    62,554    62,554 

Short-term money market

    6,762    6,762 

U.S. common stock

    59,678    59,678 

International equity

    7,053    7,053 
          

Total U.S. 

 $30,238 $136,047 $ $166,285 

U.K. Plan Assets:

             

Equities

 $6,322 $ $ $6,322 

Bonds

  7,297      7,297 

Other

  2,107      2,107 
          

Total U.K. 

 $15,726 $ $ $15,726 
          

Total pension plan assets

 $45,964 $136,047 $ $182,011 
          


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

    

Level 1

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Active

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 


 September 30, 2013 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 


 Level 1
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
 Level 2
Other
Observable
Inputs
 Level 3
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 Total 

 

Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

Total

 

U.S. Pension Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. common stock mutual funds

 $38,575 $ $ $38,575 

 

$

62,011

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

62,011

 

Common /collective funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

  74,378  74,378 

 

 

 —

 

 

78,064

 

 

 —

 

 

78,064

 

Short-term money market

  2,590  2,590 

U.S. common stock

  64,592  64,592 

 

 

 —

 

 

37,323

 

 

 —

 

 

37,323

 

International equity

  8,307  8,307 

 

 

9,040

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,040

 

         

Total U.S.

 $38,575 $149,867 $ $188,442 

 

$

71,051

 

$

115,387

 

$

 —

 

$

186,438

 

U.K. Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 $ $7,695 $ $7,695 

 

$

 —

 

$

8,539

 

$

 —

 

$

8,539

 

Bonds

  7,111  7,111 

 

 

 —

 

 

3,071

 

 

 —

 

 

3,071

 

Other

  2,865  2,865 

 

 

 —

 

 

7,450

 

 

 —

 

 

7,450

 

         

Total U.K.

 $ $17,671 $ $17,671 

 

$

 —

 

$

19,060

 

$

 —

 

$

19,060

 

         

Total pension plan assets

 $38,575 $167,538 $ $206,113 

 

$

71,051

 

$

134,447

 

$

 —

 

$

205,498

 

         

 

The primary financial objectives of the Plan'sPlans are to minimize cash contributions over the long term and preserve capital while maintaining a high degree of liquidity. A secondary financial objective is, where possible, to avoid significant downside risk in the short run. The objective is based on a long-term investment horizon so that interim fluctuations should be viewed with appropriate perspective.

The selection of the Plan'sU.S. Plan’s assumption for the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based upon the Plan'sPlan’s target allocation of 60% equities and 40% bonds, and the expected rate of return for each equity/bond asset class. Based upon the target allocation and each asset class'sclass’s expected return, the Plan'sPlan’s return on assets assumption ofis 7.50% is reasonable,, and it remains unchanged from last year'syear’s assumption. The Company also realizes that historical performance is no guarantee of future performance.

In determining the expected rate of return on plan assets, the Company takes into account the plan'sPlan’s allocation at September 30, 20132015 of 59%60% equities, 40% fixed income and 1%0% other. The Company assumes an approximately 3.00% to 4.00% equity risk premium above the broad bond market yields of 5.00% to 7.00%. Note that over very long historical periods the realized risk premium has been higher. The Company believes that its assumption of ana 7.5% long-term rate of return on plan assets is comparable to other companies, given the target allocation of the plan assets; however, there exists the potential for the use of a lower rate in the future.

It is the policy of the U.S. pension plan to invest assets with an allocation to equities as shown below. The balance of the assets are maintained in fixed income investments, and in cash holdings, to the extent permitted by the plan documents.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 8    Pension Plan and Retirement Benefits (Continued)

Asset classes as a percent of total assets:

Asset Class
Target(1)

Equity

60%

Asset Class

Fixed IncomeTarget(1)

40%

Equity

60

%

Fixed Income

40

%

Real Estate and Other

 —

0

%


(1)
From time to time the Company may adjust the target allocation by an amount not to exceed 10%.

(1)

From time to time the Company may adjust the target allocation by an amount not to exceed 10%.

The U.K. pension plan assets use a similar strategy and investment objective.

73


Table of Contents

Contributions and Benefit Payments

The Company has not yet determined the amounts to contribute to its domestic pension plans, domestic other postretirement benefit plans, and the U.K. pension plan in fiscal 2014.2016.

Pension and postretirement health care benefits, (whichwhich include expected future service)service, are expected to be paid out of the respective plans as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Postretirement

 

Fiscal Year Ending September 30
 Pension Postretirement
Health Care
 

 

Pension

 

Health Care

 

2014

 $13,355 $4,823 

2015

 13,833 5,000 

2016

 14,108 5,000 

 

$

14,458

 

$

4,870

 

2017

 14,586 5,000 

 

 

14,879

 

 

5,000

 

2018

 14,900 5,000 

 

 

15,148

 

 

5,000

 

2019-2023 (in total)

 83,714 25,000 

2019

 

 

15,572

 

 

5,000

 

2020

 

 

15,934

 

 

5,000

 

2021 - 2025 (in total)

 

 

89,488

 

 

25,000

 

Note 9  Commitments

The Company leases certain transportation vehicles, warehouse facilities, office space and machinery and equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable leases, most of which expire within 10 years and may be renewed by the Company. Rent expense under such arrangements totaled $3,607, $3,347$3,693, $3,518 and $3,693$3,403 for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively. Rent expense does not include income from sub-lease rentals totaling $112, $145$129, $147 and $129$105 for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 9    Commitments (Continued)

2013, 2015, respectively. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at September 30, 2013,2015, are as follows:

 

 

 

 


 Operating 

    

Operating

 

2014

 $3,119 

2015

 1,892 

2016

 1,392 

 

$

2,852

 

2017

 1,223 

 

 

2,027

 

2018

 913 

 

 

1,293

 

2019 and thereafter

 553 

2019

 

 

846

 

2020

 

 

117

 

2021 and thereafter

 

 

6

 

   

 

$

7,141

 

 $9,092 
   

 

Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases have not been reduced by minimum sub-lease rentals of $67$35 due in the future.

Note 10  Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company is regularly involved in litigation, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant, relating to its business and operations, including environmental, commercial, employment and in federal and/or state Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) administrative actions. Future expenditures for environmental, employment, intellectual property and other legal matters cannot be determined with any degree of certainty; however, based on the facts presently known, management does not believe that such costs will have a material effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company is currently, and has in the past been, subject to claims involving personal injuries allegedly relating to its products.products and processes. For example, the Company is presently involved in two actions involving welding rod-related injuries, which were filed in California state court against numerous manufacturers, including the Company, in May 2006 and February 2007, respectively, alleging that the welding-related products of the defendant manufacturers harmed the users of such products through the inhalation of welding fumes containing manganese. The Company (together with a number of other manufacturer defendants) is also involved in three actions alleging that asbestos in its facilities harmed

74


Table of Contents

the plaintiffs. The Company believes that it has defenses to these allegations and that, if the Company were to be found liable, the cases would not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The Company has received permits from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, or IDEM, to close and to provide post-closure monitoring and care for certain areas at the Kokomo facility previously used for the storage and disposal of wastes, some of which are classified as hazardous under applicable regulations. Closure certification was received in fiscal 1988 for the South Landfill at the Kokomo facility, and post-closure monitoring and care is ongoing there. Closure certification was received in fiscal 1999 for the North Landfill at the Kokomo facility, and post-closure monitoring and care are permitted and ongoing there. In fiscal 2007, IDEM issued a single post-closure permit applicable to both the North and South Landfills, which contains monitoring and post-closure care requirements. In addition, IDEM required that a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, Facility Investigation, or RFI and which was reviewedrenewed in 2012, be conducted in order to further evaluate one additional area of concern and one additional solid waste management unit. The RFI commenced in fiscal 2008 and is ongoing.


Table of Contents The Company believes that some additional testing is necessary.


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 10    Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies (Continued)

The Company has also received permits from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, or NCDENR, to close and provide post-closure monitoring and care for the hazardous waste lagoon at its Mountain Home, North Carolina facility. The lagoon area has been closed and is currently undergoing post-closure monitoring and care. The Company is required to monitor groundwater and to continue post-closure maintenance of the former disposal areas at each site. As a result, the Company is aware of elevated levels of certain contaminants in the groundwater, and additional corrective action by the Company could be required.

On August 3, 2012, the Company received an information request from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, relating to the Company'sCompany’s compliance with laws relating to air quality. The Company has responded to the request, and there has been no further action by the EPA.

As of September 30, 2013,2015, the Company has accrued $846$749 for post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities.activities, of which $662 is included in long-term obligations as it is not due within one year.  Accruals for these costs are calculated by estimating the cost to monitor and maintain each post-closure site and multiplying that amount by the number of years remaining in the post-closure monitoring.

        Long-term obligations consistExpected maturities of the following (in thousands):

 
 September 30, 
 
 2012 2013 

Environmental post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities

 $1,071 $846 

Less amounts due within one year

  (91) (79)
      

 $980 $767 
      

        Maturities ofpost-closure monitoring and maintenance activities (discounted) included in long-term obligations (discounted) are as follows at September 30, 2013:2015. 

 

 

 

 

2016

$

 —

 

2017

 

73

 

2018

 

77

 

2019

 

58

 

2020

 

49

 

2021 and thereafter

 

405

 

 

$

662

 

Year Ending
  
 

2014

 $ 

2015

  74 

2016

  83 

2017

  70 

2018

  72 

2019 and thereafter

  468 
    

 $767 
    

Note 11  Stock-basedStock-based Compensation

Restricted Stock Plan

On February 23, 2009, the Company adopted a restricted stock plan that reserved 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance. SharesGrants of restricted stock are grants of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to transfer restrictions, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may set restrictions on certain grantsvesting requirements based on the achievement of specific performance goals and vestingor the passage of grants to participants will also be time-based.time.


75


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 11    Stock-based Compensation (Continued)

Restricted stock grantsshares are subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates prior to the vesting perioddate or if theany applicable performance goal isgoals are not met, if applicable.met. The Company will assess, on an ongoing basis, the probability of whether the performance criteria will be achieved. The Company will recognize compensation expense over the performance period if it is deemed probable that the goalgoals will be achieved. The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s restricted stock is determined based upon the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date. The plan provides for the adjustment of the number of shares covered by an outstanding grant and the maximum number of shares for which restricted stock may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Holders of outstanding shares of restricted stock are entitled to receive dividends on, and to vote, shares of common stock.

On November 20, 2012, November 26, 2012 and December 10, 2012,25, 2014  the Company granted 31,950, 3,000 and 1,10041,700 shares respectively, of restricted stock to certain key employees and non-employee directors. The shares of restricted stock granted to employees will vest on the third anniversary of their grant date, provided that (a) the recipient is still an employee withof the Company and (b) the Company has met a three yearthree-year net income performance goal, if applicable. The shares of restricted stock granted to non-employee directors will vest on the earlier of (a) the thirdfirst anniversary of the date of grant or (b) the failure of such non-employee director to be re-elected at an annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company as a result of such non-employee director being excluded from the nominations for any reason other than cause. The fair value of the grants were $47.96, $47.62 and $48.39, respectively,$46.72 per share, the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the day of the applicable grant.

The following table summarizes the activity under the restricted stock plan for the year ended September 30, 2013:2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Number of
Shares
 Weighted
Average Fair
Value At
Grant Date
 

    

 

    

Weighted

 

Unvested at September 30, 2012

 111,000 $42.32 

 

 

 

Average Fair

 

 

Number of

 

Value At

 

 

Shares

 

Grant Date

 

Unvested at September 30, 2014

 

97,150

 

$

51.96

 

Granted

 36,050 $47.94 

 

41,700

 

$

46.72

 

Forfeited / Canceled

 (11,800)$42.23 

 

(8,950)

 

$

55.54

 

Vested

 (38,500)$34.00 

 

(18,450)

 

$

55.84

 

     

Unvested at September 30, 2013

 96,750 $47.74 
     

Unvested at September 30, 2015

 

111,450

 

$

49.07

 

Expected to vest

 77,250 $46.82 

 

88,250

 

$

48.70

 

     

 

Compensation expense related to restricted stock for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 20132015 was $992, $1,518$832, $1,295, and $832,$1,650, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 20132015 was $1,379, which is$1,900, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.081.15 years. During fiscal 2013,2015, the Company repurchased 9,9935,221 shares of stock from employees at an average purchase price of $50.51$48.04 to satisfy required withholdingemployee-owed taxes of restrictedon stock—based compensation.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 11    Stock-based Compensation (Continued)

Stock Option Plans

The Company has two stock option plans that authorize the granting of non-qualified stock options to certain key employees and non-employee directors for the purchase of a maximum of 1,500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. The original option plan was adopted in August 2004 pursuant to the plan of reorganization and provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. In January 2007, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors adopted a second option plan that provides for options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. Each plan provides for the adjustment of the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted in the event of a stock split, extraordinary dividend or distribution or similar recapitalization event. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, options granted under the option plans are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant and vest 331/3% per year over three years from the grant date. The amount of compensation cost recognized in the financial statements is measured based upon the grant date fair value.

The fair value of option grants was estimated as of the date of the grant. The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rates, expected forfeitures and dividend yields. The volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company's Company’s

76


Table of Contents

common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected term of the stock option granted. The Company uses historical volatility because management believes such volatility is representative of prospective trends. The expected term of an award is based on historical exercise data. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the awards. The expected forfeiture rate is based upon historical experience. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company'sCompany’s history and expectations regarding dividend payouts at the time of the grant. Valuation of future grants under the Black-Scholes model will include a dividend yield. The following assumptions were used for grants in the first quarter of fiscal 2013:2015:

Grant Date
 Fair
Value
 Dividend
Yield
 Risk-free
Interest Rate
 Expected
Volatility
 Expected
Life

November 20, 2012

 $13.92  1.83% 0.32% 47%3 years

December 10, 2012

 $14.12  1.82% 0.33% 47%3 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Fair

    

Dividend

    

Risk-free

    

Expected

    

Expected

 

Grant Date

 

Value

 

Yield

 

Interest Rate

 

Volatility

 

Life

 

November 25, 2014

 

$

8.17

 

1.90

%  

0.96

%  

28

%  

3

years

 

 

On November 20, 2012 and December 10, 2012,25, 2014, the Company granted 35,600 and 1,80081,100 options respectively, at an exercise price of $47.96 and $48.39, respectively,$46.72, the fair market value of the Company'sCompany’s common stock onthe day immediately preceding the day of the grant.  During fiscal 2013, 30,545No options were exercised and 33,967during fiscal 2015, however 4,500 options were forfeited/canceled.forfeited.

The stock-based employee compensation expense for stock options for the years ended September 30, 2011, 20122013, 2014 and 20132015 was $760, $561$424, $474 and $424,$534, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 20132015 was $522,$678, to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.121.24 years.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 11    Stock-based Compensation (Continued)

The following table summarizes the activity under the stock option plans for the year ended September 30, 2013:2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

 

 

Number of

 

Value

 

Exercise

 

Contractual

 

 

 

Shares

 

(000s)

 

Prices

 

Life

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2014

 

282,001

 

 

 

 

$

51.61

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

81,100

 

 

 

 

$

46.72

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 —

 

 

 

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

Canceled

 

(4,500)

 

 

 

 

$

62.41

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2015

 

358,601

 

$

358

 

$

50.37

 

5.50

yrs.

 

Vested or expected to vest

 

337,516

 

$

358

 

$

50.50

 

5.35

yrs.

 

Exercisable at September 30, 2015

 

234,867

 

$

358

 

$

51.45

 

3.80

yrs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Remaining

    

Outstanding

    

Exercisable

 

 

 

Exercise Price

 

Contractual

 

Number of

 

Number of

 

Grant Date

 

Per Share

 

Life in Years

 

Shares

 

Shares

 

March 31, 2006

 

 

31.00

 

0.50

 

10,000

 

10,000

 

March 30, 2007

 

 

72.93

 

1.50

 

45,500

 

45,500

 

March 31, 2008

 

 

54.00

 

2.50

 

55,500

 

55,500

 

October 1, 2008

 

 

46.83

 

3.00

 

20,000

 

20,000

 

March 31, 2009

 

 

17.82

 

3.50

 

12,084

 

12,084

 

January 8, 2010

 

 

34.00

 

4.25

 

12,400

 

12,400

 

November 24, 2010

 

 

40.26

 

5.17

 

19,667

 

19,667

 

November 25, 2011

 

 

55.88

 

6.17

 

19,700

 

19,700

 

November 20, 2012

 

 

47.96

 

7.17

 

35,600

 

23,734

 

December 10, 2012

 

 

48.39

 

7.17

 

1,800

 

1,200

 

November 26, 2013

 

 

52.78

 

8.17

 

45,250

 

15,082

 

November 25, 2014

 

 

46.72

 

9.17

 

81,100

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

358,601

 

234,867

 

77

 
 Number of
Shares
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(000s)
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Prices
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 

Outstanding at September 30, 2012

  318,776    $44.05    

Granted

  37,400    $47.98    

Exercised

  (30,545)   $19.57    

Canceled

  (33,967)   $59.11    
             

Outstanding at September 30, 2013

  291,664 $2,134 $45.36  5.17 yrs. 
             

Vested or expected to vest

  283,214 $2,120 $45.30  5.08 yrs. 

Exercisable at September 30, 2013

  233,962 $2,098 $44.51  4.30 yrs. 

 

Grant Date
 Exercise Price
Per Share
 Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
 Outstanding
Number of
Shares
 Exercisable
Number of
Shares
 

August 31, 2004

 $12.80  0.92  32,207  32,207 

March 31, 2006

  31.00  2.50  10,000  10,000 

March 30, 2007

  72.93  3.50  47,500  47,500 

March 31, 2008

  54.00  4.50  58,000  58,000 

October 1, 2008

  46.83  5.00  20,000  20,000 

March 31, 2009

  17.82  5.50  20,089  20,089 

January 8, 2010

  34.00  6.25  25,801  25,801 

November 24, 2010

  40.26  7.17  20,967  13,800 

November 25, 2011

  55.88  8.17  19,700  6,565 

November 20, 2012

  47.96  9.17  35,600   

December 10, 2012

  48.39  9.17  1,800   
            

        291,664  233,962 
            

Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 12  Quarterly Data (unaudited)

The unaudited quarterly results of operations of the Company for years ended September 30, 20122014 and 20132015 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 2012 

 

2014

 


 Quarter Ended 

 

Quarter Ended

 


 December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

 

Net revenues

 $128,851 $158,882 $141,574 $150,254 

 

$

93,700

 

$

115,350

 

$

126,293

 

$

120,067

 

Gross profit

 23,491 34,535 32,389 30,425 

Gross Profit

 

 

5,250

 

 

9,064

 

 

14,061

 

 

18,923

 

Net income

 8,443 15,151 13,732 12,856 

 

 

(3,492)

 

 

(1,223)

 

 

2,096

 

 

6,370

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 $0.69 $1.24 $1.12 $1.05 

 

$

(0.29)

 

$

(0.10)

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.51

 

Diluted

 $0.68 $1.23 $1.11 $1.04 

 

$

($0.29)

 

$

(0.10)

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 2013 

 

2015


 Quarter Ended 

 

Quarter Ended


 December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30 

    

December 31

    

March 31

    

June 30

    

September 30

Net revenues

 $114,300 $129,201 $123,587 $115,658 

 

$

110,676

 

$

138,688

 

$

121,270

 

$

117,001

Gross profit

 18,774 20,084 18,605 16,163 

Gross Profit

 

 

20,271

 

 

27,837

 

 

24,151

 

 

21,405

Net income

 5,835 6,436 5,297 4,009 

 

 

6,381

 

 

11,719

 

 

6,602

 

 

5,784

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 $0.47 $0.52 $0.43 $0.33 

 

 

$
0.51

 

 

$
0.94

 

 

$
0.53

 

 

$
0.46

Diluted

 $0.47 $0.52 $0.43 $0.32 

 

 

$
0.51

 

 

$
0.94

 

 

$
0.53

 

 

$
0.46

Note 13  Segment Reporting

The Company operates in one business segment: the design, manufacture, marketing and distribution of technologically advanced, high-performance alloys for use in the aerospace, land-based gas turbine, chemical processing and other industries. The Company has operations in the United States, Europe and China, which are summarized below.

78


Table of Contents

Sales between geographic areas are made at negotiated selling prices.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 13    Segment Reporting (Continued)

Revenues from external customers are attributed to the geographic areas presented based on the destination of product shipments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Year Ended September 30, 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 


 2011 2012 2013 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

 

Net Revenue by Geography:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 $344,983 $346,750 $268,054 

 

$

268,054

 

$

261,631

 

$

287,722

 

Europe

 105,725 121,781 110,389 

 

 

110,389

 

 

101,824

 

 

110,659

 

China

 40,934 48,183 39,475 

 

 

39,475

 

 

36,596

 

 

28,140

 

Other

 51,254 62,847 64,828 

 

 

64,828

 

 

55,359

 

 

61,114

 

       

Net Revenues

 $542,896 $579,561 $482,746 

 

$

482,746

 

$

455,410

 

$

487,635

 

       

Net Revenue by Product Group:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High-temperature resistant alloys

 $412,601 $423,080 $357,232 

 

$

357,232

 

$

341,557

 

$

370,603

 

Corrosive-resistant alloys

 130,295 156,481 125,514 

 

 

125,514

 

 

113,853

 

 

117,032

 

       

Net revenues

 $542,896 $579,561 $482,746 

 

$

482,746

 

$

455,410

 

$

487,635

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 September 30, 

 

September 30,

 


 2012 2013 

    

2014

    

2015

 

Long-lived Assets by Geography:

 

Long-lived Assets by Geography:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 $120,218 $146,940 

 

$

166,542

 

$

177,243

 

Europe

 3,759 5,221 

 

 

7,021

 

 

7,692

 

China

 675 603 

 

 

520

 

 

416

 

     

Total long-lived assets

 $124,652 $152,764 

 

$

174,083

 

$

185,351

 

     

Note 14  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 
 Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 Charges
(credits) to
Expense
 Deductions(1) Balance at
End of
Period
 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivables:

             

September 30, 2013

  1,249  (34) (16) 1,199 

September 30, 2012

  1,129  235  (115) 1,249 

September 30, 2011

  1,116  54  (41) 1,129 

(1)
Uncollectible accounts written off net of recoveries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Balance at

    

Charges

    

 

    

Balance at

 

 

 

Beginning

 

(credits) to

 

 

 

End of

 

 

 

of Period

 

Expense

 

Deductions(1)

 

Period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

861

 

317

 

(309)

 

869

 

September 30, 2014

 

1,199

 

8

 

(346)

 

861

 

September 30, 2013

 

1,249

 

(34)

 

(16)

 

1,199

 


(1)

Uncollectible accounts written off net of recoveries.

Note 15 Deferred Revenue

On November 17, 2006, the Company entered into a twenty-year agreement to provide conversion services to Titanium Metals Corporation ("TIMET")(TIMET) for up to ten million pounds of titanium metal annually. TIMET paid the Company a $50,000 up-front fee and will also pay the Company for its processing services during the term of the agreement (20 years) at prices established by the terms of the


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 15    Deferred Revenue (Continued)

agreement. TIMET may exercise an option to have ten million additional pounds of titanium converted annually, provided that it offers to loan up to $12,000 to the Company for certain capital expenditures which may be required to expand capacity. In addition to the volume commitment, the Company has granted TIMET a first priority security interest in its four-high Steckel rolling mill, along with rights of access if the Company enters into bankruptcy or defaults on any financing arrangements. The Company has agreed not to manufacture titanium products (other than cold reduced titanium tubing). The Company has also agreed not to provide titanium hot-rolling conversion services to any entity other than TIMET for the term of the Conversion Services Agreement. The agreement contains certain default provisions which could result in contract termination and damages, including liquidated damages of $25.0 million and the Company being required to return the unearned portion of the up-front fee. The Company considered each provision and the likelihood of the occurrence of a default that would result in liquidated damages. Based on the nature of the events that could trigger the liquidated damages clause, and the availability of the cure periods set forth in

79


Table of Contents

the agreement, the Company determined and continues to believe that none of these circumstances are reasonably likely to occur. Therefore, events resulting in liquidated damages have not been factored in as a reduction to the amount of revenue recognized over the life of the contract. The cash received of $50,000 is recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the 20-year term of the agreement. If an event of default occurred and was not cured within any applicable grace period, the Company would recognize the impact of the liquidated damages in the period of default and re-evaluate revenue recognition under the contract for future periods. The portion of the up-front fee not recognized in income is shown as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet.

Note 16  Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value:

·

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

·

Level 2—Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and

·

Level 3—Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

When available, the Company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure fair value and classifies such items within Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally-developed models that use, where possible, current market-based or independently-sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates. Items valued using internally-generated models are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. If quoted market prices are not available, the valuation model used depends on the specific asset or liability being valued. A portion of the Company'sCompany’s pension plan assets are in a common collective trust that is considered within Level 2. To determine the fair value of these assets, the Company uses the quoted market prices of the underlying assets of the common collective trust. (See Note 8.)


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 16    Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The following table represents the Company'sCompany’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 20122014 and 2013:2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2014 Fair Value Measurements

 


 September 30, 2012 Fair Value Measurements
at Reporting Date Using:
 

 

at Reporting Date Using:

 


 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and money market funds

 $46,740 $ $ $46,740 

 

$

45,871

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

45,871

 

Pension plan assets

 45,964 136,047  182,011 

 

 

41,968

 

 

174,994

 

 

 —

 

 

216,962

 

         

Total fair value

 $92,704 $136,047 $ $228,751 

 

$

87,839

 

$

174,994

 

$

 —

 

$

262,833

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2015 Fair Value Measurements

 


 September 30, 2013 Fair Value Measurements
at Reporting Date Using:
 

 

at Reporting Date Using:

 


 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and money market funds

 $68,326 $ $ $68,326 

 

$

49,045

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

49,045

 

Pension plan assets

 38,575 167,538  206,113 

 

 

71,051

 

 

134,447

 

 

 —

 

 

205,498

 

         

Total fair value

 $106,901 167,538 $ $274,439 

 

$

120,096

 

 

134,447

 

$

 —

 

$

254,543

 

         

 

The Company hashad no Level 3 assets as of September 30, 20122014 or 2013.2015.

80


Table of Contents

Note 17. Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component

Comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in equity that result from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) items, including pension and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax when applicable.


Table of Contents


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share data and otherwise noted)

Note 17. Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Changes in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

    

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

    

    

Pre-tax

    

Tax

    

Net

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

21,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,751

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

30,486

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain (loss) arising during period

 

$

74,282

 

$

(27,201)

 

 

47,081

 

 

$

(1,886)

 

$

698

 

 

(1,188)

 

 

$

(26,515)

 

$

9,595

 

 

(16,920)

 

Less: amortization of prior service cost

 

 

4,981

 

 

(1,743)

 

 

3,238

 

 

 

2,087

 

 

(773)

 

 

1,314

 

 

 

(808)

 

 

298

 

 

(510)

 

Less: amortization of gain (loss)

 

 

(13,906)

 

 

4,867

 

 

(9,039)

 

 

 

(6,608)

 

 

2,444

 

 

(4,164)

 

 

 

(7,160)

 

 

2,632

 

 

(4,528)

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

1,012

 

 

 —

 

 

1,012

 

 

 

(991)

 

 

 —

 

 

(991)

 

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,167)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

66,369

 

$

(24,077)

 

 

42,292

 

 

$

(7,398)

 

$

2,369

 

 

(5,029)

 

 

$

(38,650)

 

$

12,525

 

 

(26,125)

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

63,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(1,278)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,361

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component (Continued)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 2014

 

    

Pension

    

Postretirement

    

Foreign

    

 

 

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Exchange

 

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2013

 

$

(42,798)

 

$

(15,964)

 

$

1,963

 

$

(56,799)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

 

 

(3,418)

 

 

(3,470)

 

 

(991)

 

 

(7,879)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items (a)

 

 

808

 

 

(2,895)

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,087)

Actuarial losses (a)

 

 

4,613

 

 

1,996

 

 

 —

 

 

6,609

Tax expense or (benefit)

 

 

(2,005)

 

 

333

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,672)

Net current-period other comprehensive loss

 

 

(2)

 

 

(4,036)

 

 

(991)

 

 

(5,029)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2014

 

$

(42,800)

 

$

(20,000)

 

$

972

 

$

(61,828)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended September 30, 2015

 

    

Pension

    

Postretirement

    

Foreign

    

 

 

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Exchange

 

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2014

 

$

(42,800)

 

$

(20,000)

 

$

972

 

$

(61,828)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

 

 

(23,688)

 

 

(3,308)

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

(31,163)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items (a)

 

 

808

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

808

Actuarial losses (a)

 

 

4,726

 

 

2,434

 

 

 —

 

 

7,160

Tax benefit

 

 

(2,031)

 

 

(899)

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,930)

Net current-period other comprehensive loss

 

 

(20,185)

 

 

(1,773)

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

(26,125)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of September 30, 2015

 

$

(62,985)

 

$

(21,773)

 

$

(3,195)

 

$

(87,953)

(a)

These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic

81

 
 Year Ended September 30, 
 
 2011  
 2012  
 2013 
 
 Pre-tax Tax Net  
 Pre-tax Tax Net  
 Pre-tax Tax Net 

Net income

       $31,128         $50,182         $21,577 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

                                

Pension and postretirement:

                                

Net gain (loss) arising during period

 $(24,316)$10,670  (13,646)  $(19,688)$7,399  (12,289)  $74,282 $(27,201) 47,081 

Less: amortization of prior service cost

  4,981  (1,743) 3,238    4,981  (1,743) 3,238    4,981  (1,743) 3,238 

Less: amortization of gain (loss)

  (8,991) 1,743  (7,248)   (11,830) 4,140  (7,690)   (13,906) 4,867  (9,039)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  645    645    698    698    1,012    1,012 
                        

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 $(27,681)$10,670  (17,011)  $(25,839)$9,796  (16,043)  $66,369 $(24,077) 42,292 
                        

Total comprehensive income (loss)

       $14,117         $34,139         $63,869 
                              

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 
 Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2012 
 
 Pension
Plan
 Postretirement
Plan
 Foreign
Exchange
 Total 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 31, 2011

 $(67,822)$(15,479)$253 $(83,048)
          

Other comprehensive income (loss) before classifications

  (13,836) (7,356) 698  (20,494)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  6,395  (1,944)   4,451 
          

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

  (7,441) (9,300) 698  (16,043)
          

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2012

 $(75,263)$(24,779)$951 $(99,091)
          

Table of Contents

pension cost.


HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Note 18.   Capital Lease Obligation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(On January 1, 2015, the company entered into a capital lease agreement for the building that houses the assets and operations of LaPorte Custom Metal Processing (LCMP).  The capital asset and obligation are recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments.  The asset is included in thousands, except shareProperty, plant and per share dataequipment, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and otherwise noted)is depreciated over the 20 year lease term.  The long term component of the capital lease obligation is included in Long term obligations. 

As of September 30, 2015, future minimum lease rental payments applicable to the capital lease were as follows. 

 

 

 

 

2016

$

468

 

2017

 

534

 

2018

 

538

 

2019

 

545

 

2020

 

550

 

Thereafter

 

8,122

 

Total minimum capital lease payments

 

10,757

 

Less amounts representing interest

 

(6,377)

 

Present value of net minimum capital lease payments

 

4,380

 

Less current obligation

 

(468)

 

Total long term capital lease obligation

$

3,912

 

The capital lease obligation is included in Long-term obligations (less current portion) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

    

2014

    

2015

Future capital lease rental payments

 

$

 —

 

$

4,380

Environmental post-closure monitoring and maintenance activities

 

 

823

 

 

749

Less amounts due within one year

 

 

(78)

 

 

(555)

Long-term obligations (less current portion)

 

$

745

 

$

4,574

Note 17. Comprehensive Income (Loss)19. Acquisition

On January 7, 2015, the Company acquired the assets and Changesoperations of Leveltek Processing, LLC located in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)LaPorte, Indiana for $14.6 million in cash.  The acquisition of the LaPorte assets provides the Company control of the sheet stretching, leveling, slitting and cut-to-length operations that were previously an outsourced function. Acquisition costs incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 were not significant. The acquired business is being operated by Component (Continued)LaPorte Custom Metal Processing, LLC (LCMP), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.


82

 
 Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2013 
 
 Pension
Plan
 Postretirement
Plan
 Foreign
Exchange
 Total 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2012

 $(75,263)$(24,779)$951 $(99,091)
          

Other comprehensive income (loss) before classifications

  25,317  10,162  1,012  36,491 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  7,148  (1,347)   5,801 
          

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

  32,465  8,815  1,012  42,292 
          

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2013

 $(42,798)$(15,964)$1,963 $(56,799)
          

 Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 
 Twelve Months Ended
September 30, 2012
 Twelve Months Ended
September 30, 2013
 
 
 Pension
Plan
 Post-
retirement
Plan
 Total Pension
Plan
 Post-
retirement
Plan
 Total 

Amortization of Pension and Postretirement Plan items

                   

Prior Service Costs(a)

 $(808)$5,789 $4,981 $(808)$5,789 $4,981 

Actuarial (losses)(a)

  (9,031) (2,799) (11,830) (10,189) (3,717) (13,906)
              

Total before tax

  (9,839) 2,990  (6,849) (10,997) 2,072  (8,925)

Tax (expense) or benefit

  3,444  (1,046) 2,398  3,849  (725) 3,124 
              

Total reclassification for the period

 $(6,395)$1,944 $(4,451)$(7,148)$1,347 $(5,801)
              

(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the purchase price allocation in connection with the LCMP acquisition.  The determination of fair value for acquired assets includes the use of Level 3 inputs, such as the condition and utilization of the property, plant and equipment acquired, management’s projected financial results for LCMP, and the discount rate used to determine the present value of anticipated future cash flows.

Purchase Price

Allocation

Property, plant and equipment, net

7,563

Customer relationships

2,100

Inventory

148

Total identifiable net assets

9,811

Goodwill

4,789

Total purchase price

14,600

The goodwill recognized in connection with the Leveltek-LaPorte assets consists of the value associated with the addition of the stretching and leveling capabilities as well as increased capacity in slitting and cut-to-length operations to meet customer demand and is tax deductible.  The complementary capabilities are expected to lead to operating cost synergies as well as expand the Company’s commercial offerings.

83


Table of Contents

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Disclosur
e

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
Procedure
s

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company'sCompany’s management, including its principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b)13a‑15(b) of the Exchange Act the Company has performed, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company'sCompany’s management, including the Company'sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013.2015.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        DuringAs of the year ended September 30, 2013, we began2015, the Company has completed its third year of a multi-year phased implementation of a new global enterprise resource planning system to be used as ourits accounting system. As of September 30, 2013,2015, the accounting function for all financially significant legal entities representing approximately 20% of the Company's revenues hadhas been fully deployed on the new system. The deployment ofsystem except for the system to remaining legal entitiesinventory production modules. This is expected to be completed in multiple phases through fiscal year 2014.2016. The transition to the new information system includes a significant effort in the testing of the system prior to deployment, training of associates who will be usinguse the system and updating of the Company'sCompany’s internal control process and procedures that will be impacted by the deployment. During each phase of the deployment, the Company will testtests the results from the system and perform an appropriate level of monitoring of the system'ssystem’s results. As a result of the deployment of the system, management has updated and continues to update the systems of internal control over the impacted areas.

Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f)13a‑15(f) and 15d-15(f)15d‑15(f)) for the Company. With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of The Treadway Commission (1992)(2013). Based on the Company'sCompany’s assessment, management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2013,2015, the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

        The internal controls over financial reporting that were assessed for fiscal year 2013 were:


Table of Contents

    Antifraud programs and controls;

    Controls including IT general controls, on which other controls are dependent; and

    Controls over significant non-routine and non-systematic transactions, such as accounts involving judgments and estimates. Company level controls, including (1) the control environmental and (2) controls over the period-end financial reporting process (e.g., controls over procedures used to enter transaction totals into the general ledger; to initiate, authorize, record, and process journal entries in the general ledger; and to record recurring and nonrecurring adjustments to the financial statements).

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company'sCompany’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20132015 has been audited by Deloitte and& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its attestation report which is included herein.

Mark M. Comerford

President & Chief Executive Officer

November 21, 201319, 2015

Daniel W. Maudlin

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

November 21, 201319, 2015

Item 9B.    Other Information

 None.


84


Table of Contents

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

85


Table of Contents

Part III


Part III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Governanc
e

The information included under the caption "Business—“Business—Executive Officers of the Company"Company” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,10‑K, and under the captions "Election“Election of Directors"Directors”, "Section“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance"Compliance”, "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Code of Ethics"Ethics”, "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Committee and Director Nominations"Nominations”, "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Board Committee Structure"Structure”, "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Family Relationships"Relationships” and "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Independence of the Board of Directors and Committee Members"Members” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the meeting of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders on February 24, 2014March 1, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation
Compensatio
n

The information included under the captions "Executive Compensation"“Executive Compensation”, "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation"Participation” and "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Director Compensation Program"Program” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the meeting of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders on February 24, 2014March 1, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Matter
s

The information contained under the captions "Security“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners"Owners” and "Security“Security Ownership of Management"Management” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the meeting of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders on February 24, 2014March 1, 2016 and "Market“Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Equity Compensation Plan Information"Information” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. For additional information regarding the Company'sCompany’s stock option plans, please see Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of September 30, 2015 regarding shares of the Company’s common stock issuable pursuant to its stock option and restricted stock plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Number of securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

remaining available

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for future

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

issuance under

 

 

 

securities to

 

 

 

 

equity

 

 

 

be issued upon

 

Weighted-average

 

compensation

 

 

 

exercise

 

exercise price of

 

plans (excluding

 

 

 

of outstanding

 

outstanding

 

securities reflected

 

 

 

options,

 

options,

 

in the

 

Plan Category

 

warrants and rights

 

warrants and rights

 

second column)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

 

358,601

 

$

50.37

 

295,399

(2)


(1)

For a description of the Company’s equity compensation plans, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

(2)

Includes (i) options to purchase 100,151 shares of common stock and (ii) 195,248 shares of restricted stock.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Independenc
e

        The Company's policy is to require that all conflict of interest transactions between the Company and any of its directors, officers or 10% beneficial owners (collectively, "Insiders") and all transactions where any Insider has a direct or indirect financial interest, including related party transactions required to be reported under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, must be reviewed and approved or ratified by the Board of Directors. The material terms of any such transaction, including the nature and extent of the Insider's interest therein, must be disclosed to the Board of Directors. The Board will then review the terms of the proposed transaction to determine whether the terms of the proposed transaction are fair to the Company and are no less favorable to the Company than those that would be available from an independent third party. Following the Board's review and discussion, the proposed transaction will be approved or ratified only if it receives the affirmative votes of a majority of the directors who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the proposed transaction, even though the disinterested directors represent less than a quorum. Common or interested directors may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting of the Board of Directors which authorizes the contract or transaction.

        There are no transactions since the beginning of fiscal 2013, or any currently proposed transaction in which the Company is or was a participant in which any "related person", within the meaning of Section 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, had or will have a material interest. The information contained under the caption "Corporate“Corporate Governance—Independence of Board of Directors and Committee Members"Members” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the meeting of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders

86


Table of Contents

on February 24, 2014March 1, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.


Table of Contents


Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Service
s

The information included under the caption "Ratification“Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm"Firm” in the Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the meeting of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders on February 24, 2014March 1, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.


87


Part IV


Part IV

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule
s

(a)

Documents filed as part of this Report.

1.

1.
Financial Statements:

      The Financial Statements are set forth under Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

    2.

    Financial Statement Schedules:

      Financial Statement Schedules are omitted as they are not required, are not applicable or the information is shown in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

Exhibits. See Index to Exhibits, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(c)

Financial Statement Schedules: None


88


SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Haynes International, Inc.

By:

By:

/s/ MARK M. COMERFORD


Mark M. Comerford

Mark M. Comerford

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 21, 201319, 2015

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
Title
Date





Signature

Title

Date

/s/ MARK M. COMERFORD


Mark M. Comerford

Mark M. Comerford

President and Chief Executive Officer; Director (Principal Executive Officer)

November 21, 201319, 2015


/s/ DANIEL W. MAUDLIN


Daniel W. Maudlin

Daniel W. Maudlin



Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



November 21, 201319, 2015


/s/ DAVID S. VAN BIBBER


David S. Van Bibber

David S. Van Bibber



Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)



November 21, 201319, 2015


/s/ JOHN C. COREY


John C. Corey

John C. Corey



Chairman of the Board, Director



November 21, 201319, 2015


/s/ PAUL J. BOHAN

Paul J. Bohan



Director



November 21, 2013


/s/ DONALD C. CAMPION


Donald C. Campion

Donald C. Campion



Director



November 21, 201319, 2015


/s/ ROBERT H. GETZ


Robert H. Getz

Robert H. Getz



Director



November 21, 201319, 2015

/s/ Timothy J. McCarthy

Timothy J. McCarthy

Director

November 19, 2015

/s/ Michael L. Shor

Michael L. Shor

Director

November 19, 2015

/s/ William P. Wall

William P. Wall

Director

November 19, 2015


89


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Signature
Title
Date





/s/ TIMOTHY J. MCCARTHY
Exhibit



Timothy J. McCarthyNumber

DirectorNovember 21, 2013

Description 


/s/ MICHAEL L. SHOR

Michael L. Shor
3.1 


Director


November 21, 2013

/s/ WILLIAM P. WALL

William P. Wall


Director


November 21, 2013

Table of Contents


INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1

Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

3.2 

3.2

Amended and Restated By-lawsBy‑laws of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

4.1 

4.1

Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Haynes International, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009).

4.2 

4.2

Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 hereof).

4.3 

4.3

Amended and Restated By-lawsBy‑laws of Haynes International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 hereof).

10.1 

10.1

Form of Termination Benefits Agreements by and between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its employees, conformed to give effect to all amendments thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the year ended September 30, 2011).

10.2 

10.2

Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and among Haynes International, Inc., Haynes Wire Company, the Lenders (as defined therein), Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as agent for the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K8‑K filed July 20, 2011).

10.3 

10.3

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its directors named in the schedule to the Exhibit (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

10.4 

10.4

Conversion Services Agreement by and between the Company and Titanium Metals Corporation, dated November 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

10.5 

10.5

Access and Security Agreement by and between the Company and Titanium Metals Corporation, dated November 17, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

10.6 

10.6

Haynes International, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors on January 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

10.7 

10.7

Form of Non-QualifiedNon‑Qualified Stock Option Agreement to be used in conjunction with grants made pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

10.8 

10.8

Second Amended and Restated Haynes International, Inc. Stock Option Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors on January 22, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).


Table of Contents


Exhibit
Number
Description
10.9 

10.9

Form of Non-QualifiedNon‑Qualified Stock Option Agreements between Haynes International, Inc. and certain of its executive officers and directors named in the schedule to the Exhibit pursuant to the Haynes International, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Haynes International, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1,S‑1, Registration No. 333-140194)333‑140194).

10.10 

10.10

Executive Employment Agreement by and between Haynes International, Inc. and Mark Comerford dated September 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Haynes International, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008).

90


Exhibit
Number

Description 

10.11

Non-Qualified

Non‑Qualified Stock Option Agreement by and between Haynes International, Inc. and Mark Comerford, dated October 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Haynes International, Inc. Form 8-K8‑K filed October 7, 2008).

10.12 

10.12

Amendment No. 1 to Executive Employment Agreement by and between Haynes International, Inc. and Mark Comerford, dated August 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 8-K8‑K filed August 7, 2009).

10.13 

10.13

Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Haynes International, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009).

10.14 

10.14

Summary of 20112015 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the Haynes International, Inc. Form 8-K filed November 24, 2010)December 2, 2014).

10.15 

10.15

Amendment No.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10-Q10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011).

10.16 

10.16

Amendment No. 2 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10-Q10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013).

10.17 

10.17

Amendment No. 3 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014).

10.18 

Amendment No. 4 to the Haynes International, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Haynes International, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014).

10.19 

Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and among Haynes International, Inc., Haynes Wire Company, the Lenders (as defined therein), Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as agent for the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Haynes International, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K8‑K filed September 20, 2013).

21.1**

21.1**

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1**

23.1**

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

31.1**

31.1**

Rule 13a-14(a)13a‑14(a)/15d-4(a)15d‑4(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2**

31.2**

Rule 13a-14(a)13a‑14(a)/15d-14(a)15d‑14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1**

32.1**

Section 1350 Certifications

101**

101**

The following materials from the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20122015 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (11) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss); (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) related notes.


**

Filed herewith


91