Use these links to rapidly review the document

STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC. Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ýx


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
OR

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

OR

o¨


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                .


For the transition period from                  to                 .

Commission file number 1-34907

STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
27-3099608
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

One Federal Street, 23rd Floor
Boston, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices)


02110
(Zip Code)

(617) 574-4777
(Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
9.0%
6.625% Series AB Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value

 New York Stock Exchange
6.625%6.875% Series BC Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ýx  No o¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o¨  No ýx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ýx  No o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ýx  No o¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-acceleratednon‑accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"” “accelerated filer” and "smaller“smaller reporting company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:

Large accelerated filer ýx
Accelerated filer o¨
Non-accelerated filer o
¨
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o¨  No ýx

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $836.9$1,618 million based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange as of June 28, 2013.

30, 2016.

Number of shares of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 24, 2014: 45,101,276

           Number of shares of 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as of February 24, 2014: 2,760,000

14, 2017: 82,051,501

Number of shares of 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as of February 24, 2014:14, 2017: 2,800,000

Number of shares of 6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as of February 14, 2017: 3,000,000

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant'sregistrant’s definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the registrant'sregistrant’s fiscal year are incorporated by reference into Part II, Item 5 and Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 hereof as noted therein.


Table of Contents


STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.

Table of Contents


STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.

Table of Contents 
 

PART I.

 

Item 1.

 
PART II.

Business

2 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

8

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

29

Item 2.

Properties

29

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

38

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

38

PART II.


Item 5.

Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Item 7.

Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial ConditionsCondition and Results of Operations

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

67

Item 9B.

Other Information

68

PART III.


Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  

PART IV.


Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules



PART I.
Table
Introduction

As used herein, except where the context otherwise requires, “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us,” refer to STAG Industrial, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, including our operating partnership, STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Operating Partnership”).

Revision of Contents

Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements


In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we identified an error in the estimated useful life of a building acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014. As a result of the error, depreciation expense had been overstated and thereby rental property, net and equity were understated. We concluded that the amounts were not material to any of our previously issued consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, we revised these balances in our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. For more information on this revision, see Note 2 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report, including the information incorporated by reference, contains "forward-looking statements"“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act”)). You can identify forward-lookingforward‑looking statements by the use of words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "plans," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will,"“anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will,” and variations of such words or similar expressions. Forward-lookingForward‑looking statements in this report include, among others, statements about our future financial condition, results of operations, capitalization rates on future acquisitions, our business strategy and objectives, including our acquisition strategy, occupancy and leasing rates and trends, and expected liquidity needs and sources (including capital expenditures and the ability to obtain financing or raise capital). Our forward-looking statements reflect our current views about our plans, intentions, expectations, strategies and prospects, which are based on the information currently available to us and on assumptions we have made. Although we believe that our plans, intentions, expectations, strategies and prospects as reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that our plans, intentions, expectations, strategies or prospects will be attained or achieved and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-lookingforward‑looking statements. Furthermore, actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements and may be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation:


the factors included in this report, including those set forth under the headings "Business," "Risk“Business,” “Risk Factors," and "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;"

our ability to raise equity capital on attractive terms;

the competitive environment in which we operate;


real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets;


decreased rental rates or increasingincreased vacancy rates;


potential defaults (including bankruptcies or insolvency) on or non-renewal of leases by tenants;


potential bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants;

acquisition risks, including our ability to identify and complete accretive acquisitions and/or failure of such acquisitions to perform in accordance with projections;


the timing of acquisitions and dispositions;


potential natural disasters and other potentially catastrophic events such as hurricanes;acts of war and/or terrorism;


international, national, regional and local economic conditions;


the general level of interest rates;rates and currencies;


potential changes in the law or governmental regulations that affect us and interpretations of those laws and regulations, including changes in real estate and zoning laws or real estate investment trust ("REIT"(“REIT”) or corporate income tax laws, and potential increases in real property tax rates;


financing risks, including the risks that our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest and we may be unable to refinance our existing debt upon maturity or obtain new financing on attractive terms or at all;

credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the interest rate swaps and revolving and unfunded debt;

lack of or insufficient amounts of insurance;

our failure to complete acquisitions;

our failure to successfully integrate acquired buildings;

Table of Contents

    our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT;

    our ability to retain key personnel; 

litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and


possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by us.


Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I.


Item 1.  Business

As used herein "our company," "we," "our" and "us," refer“total annualized base rental revenue” refers to STAG Industrial, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships except where the context otherwise requires. The combined financial information presented for periods on or prior to April 19, 2011 relate solely to the STAG Predecessor Group or our "predecessor business", our "predecessor" for accounting purposes. The combined financial statements for the periods after April 20, 2011 include the financial information of our company, STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. (our "operating partnership") and our subsidiaries.

Overview

        STAG Industrial, Inc. is an industrial real estate company focused on the acquisition, ownership and management of single-tenant net-leased industrial buildings throughout the United States. We were incorporated in Maryland on July 21, 2010 to continue and grow the single-tenant industrial business conducted by our predecessor business. We completed our initial public offering on April 20, 2011.

        As of December 31, 2013, we owned 209 buildings in 34 states with approximately 38.1 million rentable square feet, consisting of 142 warehouse/distribution properties, 47 light manufacturing properties and 20 flex/office properties. We also owned one vacant land parcel adjacent to one of our buildings. As of December 31, 2013, our buildings were 95.6% leased to 191 tenants, with no single tenant accounting for more than 2.8% of our total annualized rent and no single industry accounting for more than 12.6% of our total annualized rent. As used herein, the definition of annualized rent is the contractual monthly base rent as of December 31, 20132016 (which differs from rent calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP")) multiplied by 12. If a tenant is in a free rent period as of December 31, 2013,2016, the annualized rent is calculated based on the first contractual monthly base rent amount multiplied by 12.

Overview
We ownare a REIT focused on the acquisition, ownership, and operation of single-tenant, industrial properties throughout the United States. We seek to (i) identify properties for acquisition that offer relative value across all locations, industrial property types, and tenants through the principled application of our interestsproprietary risk assessment model, (ii) operate our properties in an efficient, cost-effective manner, and (iii) capitalize our business appropriately given the characteristics of our assets. We are a Maryland corporation and our common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “STAG.”

We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and generally are not subject to federal income tax to the extent we currently distribute our income to our stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT.  We remain subject to state and local taxes on our income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.

As of December 31, 2016, we owned 314 buildings in 37 states with approximately 60.9 million rentable square feet, consisting of 243 warehouse/distribution buildings, 54 light manufacturing buildings, 16 flex/office buildings, and one building in redevelopment. As of December 31, 2016, our buildings were approximately 94.7% leased to 275 tenants, with no single tenant accounting for more than approximately 3.1% of our total annualized base rental revenue and no single industry accounting for more than approximately 13.6% of our total annualized base rental revenue. We intend to maintain a diversified mix of tenants to limit our exposure to any single tenant.
The industrial property market in the United States is a large and fragmented market that we believe offers sustainable acquisition opportunities throughout all phases of the economic cycle. Based on this estimate, our current share of our target market is less than 1%. We have a fully-integrated acquisition, leasing and asset management platform, and our senior management team has a significant amount of single-tenant, industrial real estate experience.

Our mission is to continue to be a disciplined, relative value investor and a leading owner and operator of single-tenant, industrial properties in the United States.  We seek to deliver attractive stockholder returns in all market environments by providing a covered dividend combined with accretive growth.
We are structured as an umbrella partnership REIT, also known as an UPREIT, and own all of our properties and conduct substantially all of our business through our operating partnership. We serve as the sole member of the sole general partner of,Operating Partnership, which we control and own approximately 86.65% of the outstanding limited partnership interests in, our operating partnership asmanage. As of December 31, 2013. The remaining 13.35% limited partnership interests in2016, we owned approximately 95.7% of the common equity of our operating partnership are owned by certain ofOperating Partnership, and our current and former executive officers, directors, certain ofsenior employees and their affiliates, and other outside investors. On April 20, 2011, we closed onthird parties who contributed properties to us in exchange for common equity in our Operating Partnership, owned the remaining 4.3%.  We completed our initial public offering ("IPO") of common stock (“IPO”) and completed ourrelated formation transactions, (the "formation transactions").

pursuant to which we succeeded to the business of our predecessor, on April 20, 2011.

Table of Contents

        We target the acquisition of individual Class B, single-tenant industrial properties predominantly in secondary markets throughout the United States with purchase prices ranging from $5 million to $50 million.

Our Investment Thesis
We believe due to observed market inefficiencies, that our focus on owning and expandingoperating a portfolio of suchindividually-acquired, single-tenant industrial properties throughout the United States will, when compared to other real estate portfolios, generate returns for our stockholders that are attractive in light of the associated risks associatedfor the following reasons:
Buyers tend to price an individual, single-tenant, industrial property according to the binary nature of its cash flows:  with only one potential tenant, any one property is either generating revenue or not.  Furthermore, tenants typically cover operating expenses at a property and when a property is not generating revenue, we, as owners, are responsible for paying these returns because we believe:

    expenses.  We believe the market prices these properties based upon a higher risk profile due to the single-tenant nature of these properties and therefore applies a lower value relative to a diversified cash flowing investment.
The acquisition and contribution of these single-tenant properties to an aggregated portfolio of these individual binary risk cash flows creates diversification, thereby lowering risk and creating value.
Industrial properties generally require less capital expenditure than other commercial property types and single-tenant properties generally require less expenditure for leasing, operating and capital costs per property than multi-tenant properties.

Investment yields on single-tenant individual property acquisitions are typically greater than investment yields on portfolio acquisitions. With appropriate asset diversification, individual asset risk can be mitigated across an aggregated portfolio.

Class B industrial properties tend to have higher current returns and lower volatility than Class A industrial properties.

Secondary markets generally have less occupancy and rental rate volatility than primary markets.

Other institutional, industrial real estate buyers tend to focus on larger properties and portfolios in a select few primary markets, resulting inmarkets. In contrast, we focus on smaller, individual properties across many markets; as a result, our typical competitors beingare local investors who often do not have readythe same access to debt or equity capital.capital as us. In our fragmented, predominantly non-institutional environment, a sophisticated, institutional platform with access to capital has execution and operational advantages.


TenantsWhile we invest in our target properties tend to manage their properties directly, which allows us to grow our portfolio without substantially increasing the size of our asset management infrastructure.

For a description of what we consider to be Class A and Class B properties, see "Item 2. Properties" below.

        Reflecting the market inefficiencies we have observed, our target properties are generally leased to:

    investment grade credit tenants on shorter term leases (less than four to six years);

    sub-investment grade credit tenants on longer term leases (greater than four to six years); or

    a variable combination of the above.

        We believe the market inefficiently prices our target properties because investors typically either underestimate the probability of tenant retention beyond the primary lease term or overestimate the expected cost of tenant default. Further, we believe our relationships with a national network of commercial real estate brokers and our underwriting processes, utilizingin all locations, our proprietary risk assessment model allow us to acquire properties at a discount to their intrinsic values, where intrinsic values are determined bytypically identifies the properties' future cash flows. best relative value in primary and secondary markets. We elected to be taxeddefine our Operating Portfolio as a REITincluding all warehouse and light manufacturing assets and excluding non-core flex/office assets and assets under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2011redevelopment. Our Operating Portfolio also excludes billboard, parking lot and intend to continue to qualify as REIT. So long as we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes to the extent we currently distribute our income to our stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Competitive Strengths

        We believe that our investment strategy and operating model distinguish us from other owners, operators and acquirers of industrial real estate in a number of ways, including:

    Proven Growth Profile:cell tower leases.   Since January 1, 2013, we have acquired 39 buildings representing approximately 9.0 million square feet for a total cost of approximately $346 million. Since

Table of Contents

      January 1, 2012, we have acquired 109 buildings representing approximately 21.9 million square feet for a total cost of approximately $773 million. Since the closing of our IPO offering on April 20, 2011, we have acquired 124 buildings representing approximately 25.3 million square feet for a total cost of approximately $898 million.

    Established Intermediary Relationships:  We believe we have developed a reputation as a credible and active buyer of single-tenant industrial real estate, which provides us access to significant acquisition opportunities that may not be available to our competitors.

    Scalable Platform:  Our focus on net lease properties ensures that our current staff of 44 employees as of December 31, 2013 (with incremental additions of employees) is sufficient to support our continued growth.

    Expertise in Underwriting Single-Tenant Properties:  We have developed a proprietary underwriting process that integrates real estate and corporate credit analysis to project the future cash flows of potential acquisitions. We believe that our expertise and procedures in assessing tenant retention and vacancy costs are advantages in identifying, underwriting and closing on attractive acquisition opportunities.

    Stable and Predictable Cash Flows:  Our portfolio is diversified by tenant, industry and geography, which tends to reduce risk and earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2013, no single tenant accounted2016, our Operating Portfolio investments in primary, secondary, and tertiary markets are summarized in the table below.
    Square Footage   
Total Annualized 
Base Rental Revenue
Operating Portfolio Market Type 
Number of 
Buildings
 Amount %   Occupancy 
Amount
(in thousands)
 %  
Primary (greater than 200 million net rentable square feet) 68
 14,445,533
 24.2% 95.4% $58,532
 26.1%
Secondary (25 million to 200 million net rentable square feet) 184
 38,126,550
 64.0% 96.1% 141,730
 63.2%
Tertiary (less than 25 million net rentable square feet) 45
 7,028,220
 11.8% 93.7% 24,066
 10.7%
Total/weighted average 297
 59,600,303
 100.0% 95.7% $224,328
 100.0%


We have found, and the charts below indicate, that primary and secondary markets have similar occupancy and rent growth experiences. Furthermore, secondary industrial property markets generally provide similar rent volatility and equivalent occupancy, compared to primary industrial property markets. The charts below, based on data provided by CB Richard Ellis—Econometric Advisors (“CBRE-EA”), show the quarter-over-quarter (“Q-o-Q”) percentage changes in warehouse rent and occupancy for more than 2.8% of our total annualized rent; no single industry represented more than 12.6% of our total annualized rent;primary and no single state was the site for properties generating more than 8.9% of our total annualized rent. Cash flow consistency across our portfolio is enhanced by our weighted (by rental revenue per square foot) average in-place remaining lease term of approximately 4.8 years as of December 31, 2013, low costs for tenant improvements and leasing commissions and low capital expenditures.

Experienced Management Team:  The five senior members of our management team have significant real estate industry experience, averaging approximately 27 years, with four members having previous public REIT or public real estate company experience.

secondary markets.

Our Strategies


Our primary business objectives are to own and operate a balanced and diversified portfolio of binary risk investments (individual single-tenant industrial propertiesproperties) that maximizesmaximize cash flows available for distribution to our stockholders, and to enhance stockholder value over time by achieving sustainable long-term growth in fundsdistributable cash flow from operations per share through the following strategies:

    Investment Strategy

        Our primary investment strategy is to acquire individual Class B, single-tenant industrial properties predominantly in secondary markets throughout the United States through third-party purchases and structured sale-leasebacks featuring high initial yields and strong ongoing cash-on-cash returns. Where appropriate potential returns present themselves, we also may acquire assets in primary markets.

    Growth Strategy

strategies.


External Growth through Acquisitions:    Our target acquisitions are predominantly in the $5 million to $50 million range. The competition for our target assets is primarily local investors who are not likely to have ready access to debt or equity capital. Strategy

We focus our acquisition activities (assuming our market opportunity remains attractive) on our core property types: warehouse/distribution facilities and light manufacturing facilities. From time to time, if an attractive opportunity presents itself, we may consider portfolio acquisitions. As of December 31, 2013, we were evaluating approximately $728 million of specific potential acquisitions that we have identified as warranting further investment consideration after an initial review.


Table of Contents

        Internal Growth through Asset Management:    Our asset management team utilizes our tenant relationships and leasing expertise to maintain occupancy and increase rental rates. It also collaborates with our internal credit function to actively monitor the credit profile of each of our tenants on an ongoing basis. The team's efforts have resulted in our achieving a tenant retention rate of 59% for those tenants whose leases were scheduled to expire in 2013 and 84% for those tenants whose leases were scheduled to expire in 2012. The 2013 non-renewal total is dwarfed by the approximately 1.4 million square feet of new leases executed by us for previously vacant space. As of December 31, 2013, our portfolio had approximately 1.7 million square feet, or 4.4% of our total rentable square feet, available for lease, compared to 1.4 million square feet or 4.9% as of December 31, 2012.

We blend fundamental real estate analysis with corporate credit analysis in our proprietary model to make a probabilistic assessment of future cash flows that will be realized inflows. We focus on quality real estate, long-term ownership, and the present value of estimated future periods.cash flows.
Our underwriting strategy involves our asset management and leasing, credit, capital markets and legal departments. For each asset, our analysis focuses on:

Real Estate.Asset Management and Leasing.  We evaluate the physical real estate within the context of the market (and submarket) in which it is located and the prospect for re-tenanting the building if it becomes vacant by estimating the following:

current and future market rent for this building in this location;

downtime to re-lease and related carrying costs;

cost (tenant improvements, leasing commissions and required capital expenditures) to achieve the occupancy and the projected market rent within the projected downtime;
the fungibility of the property with other properties in the market and

the flexibility of the property for other uses, including single-tenant or multi-tenant reuse.reuse; and
renewal probability, which we determine by the tenant’s use of the property and the degree to which the property is central to the tenant’s ongoing operations, the tenant’s potential cost to relocate, the supply/demand dynamic in the relevant submarket and the availability of suitable alternative properties.
Credit.    

Deal Parameters.  We evaluate the tenant and landlord obligations contained within the existing or proposed lease and other transaction documents.

Tenant Credit.We apply fundamental credit analysis to evaluate the tenant'stenant’s credit profile by focusing on the tenant'stenant’s current and historical financial status, general business plan, operating risks, capital sources, industry trends, and earnings expectations. We also analyze Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”) filings, press releases, management calls, rating agency reports, macroeconomic variables, analyst reports, and other public information.market signals. In the case of a private, non-ratednon‑rated firm, we will generally obtain financial information from the tenant, and calculate common measures of credit strength such as debt-to-EBITDA and coverage ratios.ratios, evaluate qualitative factors including but not limited to competition and customer/supplier concentration, obtain third party references, and conduct tenant interviews. For publicly rated firms, we use our own internal underwriting model, as well as the credit information issued by Moody'sMoody’s Investor Services, Standard & Poor's,Poor’s, Fitch Ratings, and Fitch Ratings.other ratings agencies. Using this data and publicly available bond default studies of comparable tenant credits, we estimate the probability of future rent loss due to tenant default.

Tenant Retention.  We assessdefault, as well as the tenant's usepossibility of the property and the degree to which the property is central to the tenant's ongoing operations, the tenant's potential cost to relocate, the supply/demand dynamica reorganization or liquidation in the relevant submarketcase of a tenant default or bankruptcy event.
Capital Markets.  We evaluate the leverage levels, credit spreads, and costs associated with the availabilitycapital used to fund the proposed acquisition.  In addition, we estimate future inflation rates and interest rates.
Legal.  We evaluate transaction documents, the tenant and landlord obligations contained within the existing or proposed leases, and other legal issues associated with the building, such as zoning, encroachments and environmental conditions.
For our portfolio as a whole, we use risk management guidelines to ensure diversification by tenant, industry, lease term and geography.
Real Estate Operation Strategy
We establish direct, long-term relationships with our tenants and use our in-house expertise in asset management and leasing to oversee all operational aspects of suitable alternative properties.our portfolio.  We believealso engage and actively manage high-quality third parties for localized leasing, property management, and construction services. Our asset management team utilizes our direct tenant relationships and leasing expertise to strive to achieve better than market levels of occupancy and rental rates. We utilize third party real estate brokers for the execution of new and renewal leases. The team also collaborates with our internal credit function to monitor the credit profile

of each of our tenants through financial statement review, tenant management calls, and press releases. The team’s efforts have resulted in our achieving an Operating Portfolio tenant retention tendsrate of approximately 69.8% for those tenants whose leases expired during the period from January 1, 2014 to be greaterDecember 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, our portfolio had approximately 5.3% of our total rentable square feet available for properties that are criticallease, compared to the tenants' businesses.

Financing Strategy


Our main focus is to preserve a flexible capital structure.structure and maintain a relatively low-leveraged balance sheet designed to allow us to capitalize on market opportunities throughout the economic cycle. We will utilizeseek tomaintain a conservative balance sheet and we achieve this by capitalizing new acquisitions with approximately 60% equity and 40% debt, and by managing our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in our respective loan agreements, to sub 45%. As of December 31, 2016, our ratio of net debt to real estate cost basis was approximately 41.0% and our ratio of total long-term indebtedness to enterprise value was approximately 32.6%. For purposes of these ratios, we define:
“net debt” as our total long-term indebtedness outstanding, less cash and cash equivalents on hand;
“long-term indebtedness” as the principal balance on our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes and mortgage notes;
“real estate cost basis” as the book value of rental property and deferred leasing intangibles, exclusive of the related accumulated depreciation and amortization; and
“enterprise value” as the market value of our common stock (based on the period-end closing price on the NYSE multiplied by our common stock and units) plus the liquidation value of our preferred stock plus the amounts outstanding under our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes.
We raise capital markets through secondary equity offerings, including but not limited to "atdiscrete marketed offerings and ongoing “at the market" equitymarket” (“ATM”) offerings, while also obtaining primarilyand through unsecured debt whichofferings such as bank borrowings and private placement issuances. We believe unsecured indebtedness is generally more efficient and less restrictive operationally than secured debt givenindebtedness. We continue to utilize our granular acquisition strategy.


TableATM program as our primary source of Contents

equity capital when required and available. As a supplement to the ATM activity, we have also executed marketed overnight equity offerings. From time to time, we issue common units of limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership to acquire properties from owners who desire a tax-deferred transaction.

Regulation

General

Our properties are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to common areas and fire and safety requirements. We believe that we and/or our tenants, as applicable, have the necessary permits and approvals to operate each of our properties.

Americans with Disabilities Act

Our properties must comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (the "ADA"“ADA”) to the extent that such properties are "public accommodations"“public accommodations” as defined under the ADA. Under the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA may require removal of structural barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. Although we believe that the properties in our portfolio in the aggregate substantially comply with current requirements of the ADA, and we have not received any notice for correction from any regulatory agency, we have not conducted a comprehensive audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine whether we are in compliance and therefore we may own properties that are not in compliance with the ADA.

ADA compliance is dependent upon the tenant'stenant’s specific use of the property, and as the use of a property changes or improvements to existing spaces are made, we will take steps to ensure compliance. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in additional costs to attain compliance, imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages or attorney'sattorney’s fees to private litigants. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our properties and to make alterations to achieve compliance as necessary.


Environmental Matters

Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws. Under these laws, courts and government agencies have the authority to require us, as owner of a contaminated property, to clean up the property, even if we did not know of or were not responsible for the contamination. These laws also apply to persons who owned a property at the time it became contaminated, and therefore it is possible we could incur these costs even after we sell some of our properties. In addition to the costs of cleanup, environmental contamination can affect the value of a property and, therefore, an owner'sowner’s ability to borrow using the property as collateral or to sell the property. Under applicable environmental laws, courts and government agencies also have the authority to require that a person who sent waste to a waste disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, pay for the clean-up of that facility if it becomes contaminated and threatens human health or the environment. We invest in properties historically used for industrial, light manufacturing and commercial purposes. Certain of our properties are on or are adjacent to or near other properties upon which others, including former owners or tenants of our properties have engaged, or may in the future engage, in activities that may generate or release petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances.

Environmental laws in the United States also require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos. According to Phase I environmental assessments prepared at the time of acquisition, 17Some of our buildings are known to have asbestos containing materials. No immediate action was recommended to address these instancesmaterials, and as a result, we do not currently plan to take


Table of Contents

any actions to address these instances. Additionally, 31 of our buildings are suspected of having asbestos containing materialsothers, due to the age of the building and observed conditions. Noconditions, are suspected of having asbestos containing materials.  We do not believe these conditions will materially and adversely affect us.  In most or all instances, no immediate action was recommended to address these instances and, as a result, we do not currently plan to take any actions to address these instances. In the event of a building renovation or demolition, a comprehensive asbestos inspection would be performed to determine proper handling and disposal of any asbestos containing materials.

conditions.

Furthermore, various court decisions have established that third parties may recover damages for injury caused by property contamination. For instance, a person exposed to asbestos at one of our properties may seek to recover damages if he or she suffers injury from the asbestos. Lastly, some of these environmental laws restrict the use of a property or place conditions on various activities. An example would be laws that require a business using chemicals to manage them carefully and to notify local officials that the chemicals are being used.

We could be responsible for any of the costs discussed above. The costs to clean up a contaminated property, to defend against a claim, or to comply with environmental laws could be material and could adversely affect the funds available for distribution to our shareholders.stockholders. All of our properties were subject to a Phase I or similar environmental assessment by independent environmental consultants at the time of acquisition. We generally expect to continue to obtain a Phase I or similar environmental assessment by independent environmental consultants on each property prior to acquiring it. However, these environmental assessments may not reveal all environmental costs that might have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, results of operations or liquidity and may not identify all potential environmental liabilities.

At the time of acquisition, we add each property to our portfolio environmental insurance policy that provides coverage for potential environmental liabilities, subject to the policy'spolicy’s coverage conditions and limitations.

We can make no assurances that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose material environmental liabilities on us, or the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by tenants, the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of our properties (such as releases from underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us.

Insurance

We carry comprehensive general liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under a blanket insurance policy. In addition, we maintain a portfolio environmental insurance policy that provides coverage for potential environmental liabilities, subject to the policy'spolicy’s coverage conditions and limitations. Generally, we do not carry insurance for certain losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by floods (unless the property is located in a flood plain), earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and standard industry practice; however, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover all of our losses. We carry employment practices liability insurance that covers us against claims by employees, former employeeemployees or potential employees for various employment related matters including wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment in the workplace, hostile work environment, and retaliation, subject to the policy'spolicy’s coverage conditions and limitations. We also carry comprehensive cyber liability insurance coverage that covers us against claims related to certain first party and third party losses including data restoration costs, crisis management expenses, credit monitoring costs, failure to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures, invasion of customer'scustomer’s privacy and negligence, subject to the policy'spolicy’s coverage conditions and limitations.

We also carry directors and officers insurance. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and standard industry practice; however, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses.

Table of Contents

Competition


In acquiring our target properties, we compete primarily with local individuals or local operators due to the smaller, single asset (versus portfolio) focus of our acquisition strategy. From time to time we compete with other public industrial property sector REITs, single-tenant REITs, income oriented non-traded REITs, and private real estate fund managers and local real estate investors and developers.funds. Local real estate investors and developers historically have represented our predominant competition for deals butand they typically do not have readythe same access to credit.capital that we do as a publicly traded institution. We also face significant competition from owners and managers of competing properties in leasing our properties to prospective tenants and in re-leasing space to existing tenants.


Operating Segments

We manage our operations on an aggregated, single segment basis for purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions, and accordingly, have only one reporting and operating segment. See Note 2 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under “Segment Reporting.”

Employees


As of December 31, 2013,2016, we employed 4468 full-time employees. We believe that our relationships with our employees are good. None of our employees are represented by a labor union.


Our Corporate Structure

We were incorporated in Maryland on July 21, 2010, and our Operating Partnership was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on December 21, 2009.

We are structured as an UPREIT; our publicly-traded entity, STAG Industrial, Inc., is the REIT in the UPREIT structure, and our Operating Partnership is the umbrella partnership. We own a majority, but not all, of the Operating Partnership. We also wholly own the sole general partner (the manager) of the Operating Partnership. Substantially all of our assets are held in, and substantially all of our operations are conducted through, the Operating Partnership. Shares of our common stock are listed and traded on the NYSE. The limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, which we sometimes refer to as “units,” are not and cannot be publicly traded, although they may provide liquidity through an exchange feature described below. Our UPREIT structure allows us to acquire a property from an owner on a tax-deferred basis by issuing units in exchange for the property.

The common units of limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership correlate on a one-for-one economic basis to the shares of common stock in the REIT. Each common unit receives the same distribution as a share of our common stock, the value of each common unit is tied to the value of a share of our common stock and each common unit, after one year, generally may be redeemed (that is, exchanged) for cash in an amount equivalent to the value of a share of common stock or, if we choose, for a share of common stock on a one-for-one basis.


The following is a simplified diagram of our UPREIT structure at December 31, 2016.

Additional Information

        Effective January 27, 2014, our

Our principal executive offices are located at One Federal Street, 23rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. Prior to January 27, 2014, our principal executive offices were located at 99 High Street, 28th23rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. Our telephone number is (617) 574-4777.
Our website is www.stagindustrial.com. The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this report or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

How to Obtain Our SEC Filings

        All reports we file with the SEC are available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the public reference room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to any of those reports that we file with the SEC are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable through our website at www.stagindustrial.com. Also posted on our website, and available in print upon request, are charters of each committee of the board of directors, our code of business conduct and ethics and our corporate governance guidelines. Within the time period required by the SEC, we will post on our website any amendment to the code of business conduct and ethics and any waiver applicable to any executive officer, director or senior financial officer. The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this report or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

All reports, proxy and information statements and other information we file with the SEC are also available free through the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the public reference room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we may currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following or other risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows, and distributions, as well as the market prices for our securities, could be materially adversely affected.


Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

Our investments are concentrated in the industrial real estate sector, and our businesswe would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector.

As of December 31, 2013, all2016, most of our 209314 buildings were industrial properties, including 142243 warehouse/distribution facilities, 4754 light manufacturing facilities, and 2016 flex/office facilities.facilities, and one building in redevelopment. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in the industrial real estate sector to a greater extent than if our properties were more diversified across other sectors of the real estate industry.


Table of Contents

Adverse economic conditions will negatively affectharm our returns and profitability.

Our operating results may be affected by market and economic challenges including the current global economic credit environment and economic uncertainties, which may result from a continued or exacerbated general economic slowdown experienced by the nation as a whole or by the local economies where our properties may be located or our tenants may conduct business, or by the real estate industry, including the following:

poor economic conditions may result in tenant defaults under leases;

leases and extended vacancies at our properties;
re-leasing may require concessions or reduced rental rates under the new leases due to reduced demand;

adverse capital and credit market conditions may restrict our operating activities; and

constricted access to credit may result in tenant defaults, non-renewals under leases or inability of potential buyers to acquire properties held for sale.

Also, to the extent we purchase real estate in an unstable market, we are subject to the risk that if the real estate market ceases to attract the same level of capital investment in the future that it attracts at the time of our purchases, or the number of companies seeking to acquire properties decreases, the value of our investments may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paypaid for these investments. The length and severity of any economic slowdown or downturn cannot be predicted. Our operations could be negatively affected to the extent that an economic slowdown or downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.

Substantial international, national and local government deficits and the weakened financial condition of these governments may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

affect us.

The values of, and the cash flows from, the properties we own may be affected by developments in global, national and local economies. As a result of the recent global economic crisis and the significant government interventions, federal, state and local governments have incurred record deficits and assumed or guaranteed liabilities of private financial institutions or other private entities. These increased budget deficits and the weakened financial condition of federal, state and local governments may lead to reduced governmental spending, tax increases, public sector job losses, increased interest rates, currency devaluations, defaults on debt obligations or other adverse economic events, which may directly or indirectly adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There can be no assurance that the global market disruptions, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and financial institutions, will improve, nor can there be any assurance that future assistance packages will be available or, even if provided, will be sufficient to stabilize the affected countries and markets. Risks and ongoing concerns about the global economic crisis could have a detrimental impact on economic recovery, financial markets and institutions and the availability of debt financing, which may directly or indirectly adversely affect our business,us.
In addition, on June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a referendum in which a majority of voters voted to exit the European Union, known as Brexit. Negotiations will determine the future terms of the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union, including, among other things, the terms of trade between the United Kingdom and the European Union. The effects of Brexit will depend on any agreements the United Kingdom makes to retain access to European Union markets either during a transitional period or more permanently. Brexit could adversely affect European and global economic or market conditions and could contribute to instability in global financial conditionmarkets. Any of these effects of Brexit, and results of operations.

others we cannot anticipate, may adversely affect us.


Events or occurrences that affect areas in which our properties are geographically concentrated may impact financial results.

In addition to general, regional, national and international economic conditions, our operating performance is impacted by the economic conditions of the specific markets in which we have concentrations of properties. We have holdings in the following states, which, as of December 31, 2013, accounted2016, were the three largest when accounting for the percentage of our total annualized rent indicated: base

rental revenue: Illinois (8.9%) (8.2%, spread over 2 CBSA's); North Carolina (8.7%); Ohio (8.3%); Michigan (7.2%) (7.5%, spread over 9 CBSA's); and Indiana (6.9%South Carolina (7.4%, spread over 6 CBSA's). We define Core Based Statistical Area ("CBSA"). as a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget that consists of one or more counties (or equivalents) anchored by an urban center of at least 10,000 people plus adjacent counties that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Our operating performance could be adversely affected if conditions become less favorable in any of the states or regions in which we have a concentration of properties.


Table of Contents

We are subject to industry concentrations that make us susceptible to adverse events with respect to certain industries.

We are subject to certain industry concentrations with respect to our properties, including the following, which, as of December 31, 2013, accounted2016, were the three largest when accounting for the percentage of our total annualized rent indicated: base rental revenue: Automotive (12.5%); Containers & Packaging (11.1% (13.6%); Industrial Equipment, Components &Component and Metals (10.6%(11.3%); and Air Freight and Logistics (9.3%); and Food and Beverages (7.7%(11.2%). Such industries are subject to specific risks that could result in downturns within the industries. Any downturn in one or more of these industries, or in any other industry in which we may have a significant concentration now or in the future, could adversely affect our tenants who are involved in such industries. If any of these tenants is unable to withstand such downturn or is otherwise unable to compete effectively in its business, it may be forced to declare bankruptcy, fail to meet its rental obligations, seek rental concessions or be unable to enter into new leases, which could materially and adversely affect us.

We are subject to risks involved in single-tenant leases, and the default

Default by one or more of our tenants could materially and adversely affect us.

Any of our tenants may experience a downturn in its business at any time that may significantly weaken its financial condition or cause its failure. As a result, such a tenant may decline to extend or renew its lease upon expiration, fail to make rental payments when due or declare bankruptcy. The default, financial distress or bankruptcy of a single tenant could cause interruptions in the receipt of rental revenue and/or result in a vacancy, which is, in the case of a single-tenant property, likely to result in the complete reduction in the operating cash flows generated by the property leased to that tenant and may decrease the value of that property. In addition, a majority of our leases generally require the tenant to pay all or substantially all of the operating expenses normally associated with the ownership of the property, such as utilities, real estate taxes, insurance and routine maintenance. Following a vacancy at a single-tenant property, we will be responsible for all of the operating costs at such property until it can be re-let, if at all.

If our tenants are unable to obtain financing necessary to continue to operate their businesses and pay us rent, we could be materially and adversely affected.

Many of our tenants rely on external sources of financing to operate their businesses. The U.S. financial and credit markets may continue to experience liquidity disruptions, resulting in the unavailability of financing for many businesses. If our tenants are unable to obtain financing necessary to continue to operate their businesses, they may be unable to meet their rent obligations to us or enter into new leases with us or be forced to declare bankruptcy and reject our leases, which could materially and adversely affect us.

We depend on key personnel,personnel; the loss of their full service could adversely affect us.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain key personnel including, but not limited to, our executive officers, whose continued service is not guaranteed, and each of whom would be difficult to replace. While we have entered into employment contracts with our executive officers, they may nevertheless cease to provide services to us at any time. If any of our key personnel were to cease employment with us, our operating results could suffer. Our ability to retain our management group or to attract suitable replacements should any members of the management group leave is dependent on the competitive nature of the employment market. The loss of services from key members of the management group or a limitation in their availability could adversely impact our financial condition and cash flows. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets. WeAs of December 31, 2016, we have not obtained and do not expect to obtain key man life insurance on any of our key personnel except for Mr. Benjamin S. Butcher, the founder of our

personnel.

Table of Contents

predecessor business and our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman. The policy has limits in the amount of $5.0 million and covers us in the event of Mr. Butcher's death.

We also believe that, as we expand, our future success depends, in large part, upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, investment, financing, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel.

Our growth will depend upon future acquisitions of properties, and we may be unable to consummate acquisitions on advantageous terms or acquisitions may not perform as we expect.

We acquire and intend to continue to acquire primarily generic warehouse/distribution properties and light manufacturing properties. The acquisition of properties entails various risks, including the risks that our investments may not perform as we expect. Further, we face competition for attractive investment opportunities from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including both publicly-traded REITs and private institutional investment funds, and these competitors may have greater financial resources than we and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire properties. This competition will increase as investments in real estate become increasingly attractive relative to other forms of investment. As a result of competition, we may be unable to acquire additional

properties for the purchase price we desire. In addition, we expect to finance future acquisitions through a combination of secured and unsecured borrowings, proceeds from equity or debt offerings by us or our operating partnershipOperating Partnership or its subsidiaries and proceeds from property contributions and divestitures which may not be available and which could adversely affect our cash flows. Any of the above risks could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay distributions on, and the market price of, our securities.

We may be unable to source "limited marketing" deal flow in the future, which could adversely affect our ability to locate and acquire additional properties at attractive prices.

        A key component of our growth strategy is to continue to acquire additional industrial real estate assets. Many of the acquisitions we sourced, based on total purchase price, were acquired before they were widely marketed by real estate brokers, or "limited marketing" transactions. Properties that are acquired by "limited marketing" transactions are typically more attractive to us as a purchaser because of the absence of a formal sales process, which could lead to higher prices. If we cannot obtain "limited marketing" deal flow in the future, our ability to locate and acquire additional properties at attractive prices could be somewhat adversely affected.

The cash available for distribution to stockholders may not be sufficient to pay dividends at expected levels, nor can we assure you of our ability to make distributions in the future.

Distributions will be authorized and determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion from time to time and will depend upon a number of factors, including:

cash available for distribution;

our results of operations;

our financial condition, especially in relation to the anticipated future capital needs of our properties;

the distribution requirements for REITs under the Code;

our operating expenses; and

other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

Table of Contents

Consequently, we may not continue our current level of distributions to stockholders, and our distribution levels may fluctuate.

In addition, some of our distributions may include a return of capital. To the extent that we make distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions would generally be considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes to the extent of the holder'sholder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the effect of reducing the holder'sholder’s adjusted tax basis in its investment. To the extent that distributions exceed the adjusted tax basis of a holder'sholder’s shares, they will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such stock. If we borrow to fund distributions, our future interest costs would increase, thereby reducing our earnings and cash available for distribution from what they otherwise would have been.

We have owned our properties for a limited time, and we may not be aware of characteristics or deficiencies involving any one or all of them.

The majority of our properties have been under management for less than five years. In addition, sincein the completion of our initial public offering,past five years, we have acquired an additional 124264 buildings totaling approximately 25.353.8 million rentable square feet. These properties may have characteristics or deficiencies unknown to us that could affect their valuation or revenue potential and such properties may not ultimately perform up to our expectations. We cannot assure you that the operating performance of the properties will not decline under our management.

We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems.

We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet,internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed to not be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.risk entirely. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems; result in misstated financial reports, violations of loan covenants and/or missed reporting deadlines; result in our inability to properly monitor our compliance with the rules and regulations regarding our qualification as a REIT; result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, which others could use to compete against us or for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes; require significant

management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result; subject us to claims for breach of contract, damages, credits, penalties or termination of leases or other agreements; or damage our reputation among our tenants and investors generally.


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure

Certain of our officers and directors have duties to Fund II, which may create conflicts of interest and may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.

        Certain of our executive officers and one of our directors also serve as officers or on the board of managers of STAG Investments II, LLC ("Fund II"), a private equity real estate fund that continues to operate as a private, fully invested fund. Our officers and director may have conflicting duties because they have a duty to both us and to Fund II, which retained ownership of certain of its properties and continues as a private, fully-invested fund until liquidated. Prior to the completion of the formation transactions, Fund II was fully invested and, as a result, will not be making any additional investments in income properties. However, some Fund II properties may be competitive with our current or future properties. It is possible that the officers' and board members' fiduciary duty to Fund II, including, without limitation, their interests in Fund II, will conflict with what will be in the best interests of our company.

Our fiduciary duties as sole member of the general partner of our operating partnership could create conflicts of interest, which may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.

        We, as the sole member of the general partner of our operating partnership, have fiduciary duties to the other limited partners in our operating partnership, the discharge of which may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. The limited partners of our operating partnership have agreed that, in the event of a conflict in the fiduciary duties owed by us to our stockholders and, in our capacity as indirect general partner of our operating partnership, to such limited partners, we are under no obligation to give priority to the interests of such limited partners. In addition, those persons holding common units will have the right to vote on certain amendments to the operating partnership agreement (which require approval by a majority in interest of the limited partners, including us) and individually to approve certain amendments that would adversely affect their rights. These voting rights may be exercised in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders. For example, we are unable to modify the rights of limited partners to receive distributions as set forth in the operating partnership agreement in a manner that adversely affects their rights without their consent, even though such modification might be in the best interest of our stockholders.

        In addition, conflicts may arise when the interests of our stockholders and the limited partners of our operating partnership diverge, particularly in circumstances in which there may be an adverse tax consequence to the limited partners. Tax consequences to holders of common units upon a sale or refinancing of our properties may cause the interests of our senior management to differ from your own. As a result of unrealized built-in gain attributable to contributed property at the time of contribution, some holders of common units, including our principals, may suffer different and more adverse tax consequences than holders of our securities upon the sale or refinancing of the properties owned by our operating partnership, including disproportionately greater allocations of items of taxable income and gain upon a realization event. As those holders will not receive a correspondingly greater distribution of cash proceeds, they may have different objectives regarding the appropriate pricing, timing and other material terms of any sale or refinancing of certain properties, or whether to sell or refinance such properties at all.

        We may experience conflicts of interest with several members of our senior management team and board who have or may become limited partners in our operating partnership through the receipt of common units or long-term incentive plan units in our operating partnership ("LTIP units") granted under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.


Table of Contents

Our growth depends on external sources of capital, which are outside of our control which mayand affect our ability to seize strategic opportunities, satisfy debt obligations and make distributions to our stockholders.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are generally required under the Code to distribute annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income, including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any necessary acquisition financing, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we may rely on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all. Any additional debt we incur will increase our leverage. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on:

general market conditions;

the market'smarket’s perception of our growth potential;

our current debt levels;

our current and expected future earnings;

our cash flow and cash dividends; and

the market price per share of our common stock.

If we cannot obtain capital from third-party sources, we may not be able to acquire properties when strategic opportunities exist, meet the capital and operating needs of our existing properties or satisfy our debt service obligations. Further, in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements and maintain our REIT status and to avoid the payment of income and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These short-term borrowing needs could result from differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves, certain restrictions on distributions under loan documents or required debt or amortization payments.

To the extent that capital is not available to acquire properties, profits may not be realized or their realization may be delayed, which could result in an earnings stream that is less predictable than some of our competitors and result in us not meeting our projected earnings and distributable cash flow levels in a particular reporting period. Failure to meet our projected earnings and distributable cash flow levels in a particular reporting period could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and on the market price of our stock.

STAG Predecessor Group and STAG Industrial, Inc.

We have experienced historical net losses and accumulated deficits after depreciation and amortization and we may experience future losses.

        STAG Industrial, Inc.

We had historical net losses attributable to common stockholders for the years ended December 31, 20132015 and December 31, 20122014 of $4.2approximately $38.6 million and $12.8$14.9 million, and for the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 of $6.8 million, respectively. STAG Predecessor Group had historical net losses of $0.2 million for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011. We would have been profitable had the net losses excluded the non-cash impacts of depreciation and amortization. STAG Predecessor Group had historical accumulated deficits after effects of depreciation and amortization of $14.0 million as of April 19, 2011. There can be no assurance that we will not incur net losses in the future after excluding the effects of depreciation and amortization, which could adversely affect our ability to service our indebtedness and our ability to pay dividends or make distributions, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of our stock.

Certain of our officers and the chairman of our board of directors have duties to Fund II, which may create conflicts of interest and may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.
Certain of our executive officers and the chairman of our board of directors also serve as officers or on the board of managers of STAG Investments II, LLC (“Fund II”), a private equity real estate fund that continues to operate as a private, fully invested fund. Our officers and the chairman of our board of directors may have conflicting duties because they have a duty to both us and to Fund II, which retained ownership of certain of its properties. While Fund II is pursuing an orderly liquidation and will not be making any additional investments, some of its existing properties may be competitive with our properties. It is possible that the officers’ and the chairman of our board of directors' fiduciary duty to Fund II, including, without limitation, their interests in Fund II, will conflict with what will be in the best interests of our company.

Table

Our fiduciary duties as sole member of Contents

the general partner of our Operating Partnership could create conflicts of interest, which may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.

We, as the sole member of the general partner of our Operating Partnership, have fiduciary duties to the other limited partners in our Operating Partnership, the discharge of which may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. The limited partners of our Operating Partnership have agreed that, in the event of a conflict in the fiduciary duties owed by us to our stockholders and, in our capacity as indirect general partner of our Operating Partnership, to such limited partners, we are under no obligation to give priority to the interests of such limited partners. In addition, those persons holding common units will have the right to vote on certain amendments to the Operating Partnership agreement (which require approval by a majority interest of the limited partners, including us) and individually to approve certain amendments that would adversely affect their rights. These voting rights may be exercised in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders. For example, we are unable to modify the rights of limited partners to receive distributions as set forth in the Operating Partnership agreement in a manner that adversely affects their rights without their consent, even though such modification might be in the best interest of our stockholders.
In addition, conflicts may arise when the interests of our stockholders and the limited partners of our Operating Partnership diverge, particularly in circumstances in which there may be an adverse tax consequence to the limited partners. Tax consequences to holders of common units upon a sale or refinancing of our properties may cause the interests of our senior management to differ from your own. As a result of unrealized built-in gain attributable to contributed property at the time of contribution, some holders of common units, including our principals, may suffer different and more adverse tax consequences than holders of our securities upon the sale or refinancing of the properties owned by our Operating Partnership, including disproportionately greater allocations of items of taxable income and gain upon a realization event. As those holders will not receive a correspondingly greater distribution of cash proceeds, they may have different objectives regarding the appropriate pricing, timing and other material terms of any sale or refinancing of certain properties, or whether to sell or refinance such properties at all.
We may experience conflicts of interest with several members of our senior management team and board who have or may become limited partners in our Operating Partnership through the receipt of common units or long-term incentive plan units in our Operating Partnership (“LTIP units”) granted under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”).
We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements for which our accounting, internal audit and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared and we may not be able to accurately report our financial results.

We are subject to reporting and other obligations under the Exchange Act, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. We may need to upgrade our systems or create new systems; implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures; expand our internal audit function; and hire additional accounting, internal audit and finance staff. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and price of our securities.

Our charter, the partnership agreement of our operating partnershipOperating Partnership and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay or prevent a change of control transaction.

Our charter contains 9.8% ownership limits.  Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to limit any person to actual or constructive ownership of no more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our capital stock and no more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock. In addition, the articles supplementary for our 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "series A preferred stock") and our 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "series“Series B preferred stock"Preferred Stock”), and our 6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) provide that generally no person may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Code, either more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock or series B preferred stock.Series C Preferred Stock. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from the ownership limits. However, our board of directors may not grant an exemption from the ownership limits to any proposed transferee whose ownership, direct or indirect, of more than 9.8% of the value or number of our outstanding shares of our common stock, our series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock or our series B preferred stockSeries C Preferred Stock could jeopardize our status as a REIT. The ownership limits contained in our charter and the restrictions on ownership of our common stock may delay or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Our board of directors may create and issue a class or series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.  Subject to the rights of holders of series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock and series B preferred stockSeries C Preferred Stock to approve the classification or issuance of any class or series of stock ranking senior to the series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock or our series B preferred stock,Series C Preferred Stock, our board of directors is empowered

under our charter to amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our common stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue, to designate and issue from time to time one or more classes or series of preferred stock and to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock without stockholder approval. Subject to the rights of holders of series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock and the series B preferred stockSeries C Preferred Stock discussed above, our board of directors may determine the relative rights, preferences and privileges of any class or series of preferred stock issued. The issuance of preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control transaction that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Certain provisions in the partnership agreement for our operating partnershipOperating Partnership may delay or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us.  Provisions in the partnership agreement for our operating partnership may delay or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions of us or changes in our control. These


Table of Contents

provisionsOperating Partnership could discourage third parties from making proposals involving an unsolicited acquisition of us or change of our control, although some stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable. These provisions include, among others:

redemption rights of qualifying parties;

transfer restrictions on our common units;

the ability of the general partner in some cases to amend the partnership agreement without the consent of the limited partners; and

the right of the limited partners to consent to transfers of the general partnership interest and mergers under specified circumstances.

Any potential change of control transaction may be further limited as a result of provisions of the partnership unit designation for the LTIP units, which require us to preserve the rights of LTIP unit holders and may restrict us from amending the partnership agreement for our operating partnershipOperating Partnership in a manner that would have an adverse effect on the rights of LTIP unit holders.

Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control.  Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law ("MGCL"(“MGCL”) may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or impeding a change of control under circumstances that might be in the best interest of our stockholders, including:

business combination"combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an "interested stockholder"“interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose special appraisal rights and special stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

"
control share"share” provisions that provide that "control shares"“control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a "control“control share acquisition"acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of "control shares"“control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.

We have elected to opt out of these provisions of the MGCL, in the case of the business combination provisions of the MGCL, by resolution of our board of directors, and in the case of the control share provisions of the MGCL, pursuant to a provision in our bylaws. Only upon the approval of our stockholders, our board of directors may by resolution elect to repeal the foregoing opt-outs from the business combination provisions of the MGCL and we may, only upon the approval of our stockholders, by amendment to our bylaws, opt in to the control share provisions of the MGCL in the future.

Additionally, Title 8, Subtitle 3 of the MGCL, permits our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or our bylaws, to implement takeover defenses, some of which (for example, a classified board) we do not currently have. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company under circumstances that might be in the best interest of our stockholders.


Table of Contents

Our charter, bylaws, the partnership agreement for our operating partnershipOperating Partnership and Maryland law also contain other provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might be in the best interest of our stockholders.


Under their employment agreements, our executive officers have the right to terminate their employment and, under certain conditions, receive severance, which may adversely affect us.

The employment agreements with our executive officers provide that each executive may terminate his or her employment and, under certain conditions, receive severance based on two or three times (depending on the officer) the annual total of salary and bonus and immediate vesting of all outstanding equity-based awards. In the case of certain terminations, they would not be restricted from competing with us after their departure.

Compensation awards to our management may not be tied to or correspond with our improved financial results or the sharestock price, of our common stock, which may adversely affect us.

The compensation committee of our board of directors is responsible for overseeing our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including our executive compensation plans and our incentive compensation and equity-based compensation plans. Our compensation committee has significant discretion in structuring compensation packages and may make compensation decisions based on any number of factors. As a result, compensation awards may not be tied to or correspond with improved financial results at our company or the share price of our common stock.

Our board of directors can take many actions without stockholder approval.

Our board of directors has overall authority to oversee our operations and determine our major corporate policies. This authority includes significant flexibility. For example, our board of directors can do the following:

amend or revise at any time and from time to time our investment, financing, borrowing and dividend policies and our policies with respect to all other activities, including growth, debt, capitalization and operations;

amend our policies with respect to conflicts of interest provided that such changes are consistent with applicable legal requirements;

within the limits provided in our charter, prevent the ownership, transfer and/or accumulation of shares in order to protect our status as a REIT or for any other reason deemed to be in the best interests of us and our stockholders;

issue additional shares without obtaining stockholder approval, which could dilute the ownership of our then-currentexisting stockholders;

amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series, without obtaining stockholder approval;

subject to the rights of holders of our series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock and of our series B preferred stock,Series C Preferred Stock, classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock, set the preferences, rights and other terms of such classified or reclassified shares, without obtaining stockholder approval;

make certain amendments to our equity incentive plan;
employ and compensate affiliates;

direct our resources toward investments that do not ultimately appreciate over time;

change creditworthiness standards with respect to third-party tenants; and

Table of Contents

Any of these actions could increase our operating expenses, impact our ability to make distributions or reduce the value of our assets without giving you, as a stockholder, the right to vote.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.

Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter eliminates our directors'directors’ and officers'officers’ liability to us and our stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. Our bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law for liability actually incurred in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party, except to the

extent that the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was either committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services, or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers.

The number of shares of our common stock available for future sale, including by our affiliates and other continuingor investors in our Operating Partnership, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and future sales by us of shares of our common stock may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market, or upon exchange of common units or exercise of any options, or the perception that such sales might occur could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The exchange of common units for common stock, the exercise of any stock options or the vesting of any restricted stock granted under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, the issuance of our common stock or common units in connection with property, portfolio or business acquisitions and other issuances of our common stock or common units could have an adverse effect on the market price of the shares of our common stock. Also, continuing investors in our initial public offering and the related formation transactions that hold common units are parties to an agreement that provides for registration rights. These registration rights required us to file a "shelf" registration statement covering all shares of our common stock for which their common units may be redeemed or exchanged pursuant to the partnership agreement of our operating partnership. A shelf registration statement covering these shares has been filed and is currently effective. The existence of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan or upon exchange of common units may adversely affect the terms upon which we may be able to obtain additional capital through the sale of equity securities. We also have filed a registration statement with the SEC allowing us to offer, from time to time, an indefinite amount of equity securities (including common or preferred stock) on an as-needed basis and subject to our ability to affect offerings on satisfactory terms based on prevailing conditions. In addition, our board of directors authorized us to issue shares of common stock in our “at-the-market” offering program. Our ability to execute our business strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including issuances of common and preferred stock. No prediction can be made about the effect that future distributions or sales of our common stock will have on the market price of our common shares. In addition, future sales by us of our common stock may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common stock upon liquidation, or equity securities, which would dilute our existing stockholders and may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of distributions, may adversely affect the market price of our securities.

Our common stock is ranked junior to our series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock and series B preferred stock.Series C Preferred Stock. Our outstanding series A preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock and series B preferred stockSeries C Preferred Stock also has or will have a preference upon our dissolution, liquidation or winding up in respect of assets available for distribution to our stockholders. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other


Table of Contents

protections against dilution. In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes and classes of preferred or common stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our securities or both. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our securities and diluting their proportionate ownership.

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above the price at which they traded when you acquired them. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect the market price of our common stock or result in fluctuations in the market price or trading volume of our common stock include:

actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;

changes in our operations or earnings estimates or publication of research reports about us or the industry;

changes in our dividend policy;

increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our shares to demand a higher yield;

changes in market valuations of similar companies;

adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur in the future;


our ability to comply with applicable financial covenants in our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and other loan agreements;

additions or departures of key management personnel;

actions by institutional stockholders;

the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in this report;

speculation in the press or investment community; and

general U.S. and worldwide market and economic conditions.

Table of Contents

General Real Estate Risks

Our performance and value are subject to general economic conditions and risks associated with our real estate assets.

The investment returns available from equity investments in real estate depend on the amount of income earned and capital appreciation generated by the properties, as well as the expenses incurred in connection with the properties. If our properties do not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, then our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected. In addition, there are significant expenditures associated with an investment in real estate (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs) that generally do not decline when circumstances reduce the income from the property. Income from and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by:

changes in general or local economic climate;

the attractiveness of our properties to potential tenants;

changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;

bankruptcies, financial difficulties or lease defaults by our tenants;

changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive or otherwise reduce returns to stockholders;

changes in operating costs and expenses and our ability to control rents;

changes in or increased costs of compliance with governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws, and our potential liability thereunder;

our ability to provide adequate maintenance and insurance;

changes in the cost or availability of insurance, including coverage for mold or asbestos;

unanticipated changes in costs associated with known adverse environmental conditions or retained liabilities for such conditions;

periods of high interest rates and tight money supply;

tenant turnover;

general overbuilding or excess supply in the market; and

disruptions in the global supply chain caused by political, regulatory or other factors including terrorism.

In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or public perception that any of these events may occur, would result in a general decrease in rents or an increased occurrence of defaults under existing leases, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Future terrorist attacks may result in declining economic activity, which could reduce the demand for, and the value of, our properties. To the extent that future attacks impact our tenants, their businesses similarly could be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to honor their existing leases.

For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties.


Table of Contents

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.

We compete with other owners, operators and developers of real estate, some of which own properties similar to ours in the same markets and submarkets in which our properties are located. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants'tenants’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition, cash flows, cash available for distribution, trading price of our securities and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected.

A significant portion of our properties have leases that expire in the next three years and we may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, and the value of our securities.

expire.

Our results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, and the value of our securities would be adversely affected if we are unable to lease, on economically favorable terms, a significant amount of space in our operating properties. As of December 31, 2013,2016, leases with respect to 33.0%approximately 44.8% (excluding month to month leases, which comprises an additional 0.4%) of our total annualized rentbase rental revenue will expire before December 31, 2016.2019. We cannot assure you that expiring leases will be renewed or that our properties will be re-leased at base rental rates equal to or above the current average basemarket rental rates. In addition, the number of vacant or partially vacant industrial properties in a market or submarket could adversely affect our ability to re-leasere‑lease the space at attractive rental rates.

A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to sell or re-lease, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, and the value of our securities.

re-lease.

A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. In addition, certain of the properties we acquire may have some level of vacancy at the time of closing. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant. We may have difficulty obtaining a new tenant for any vacant space we have in our properties. If the vacancy continues for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenue resulting in less cash available to be distributed to stockholders. In addition, the resale value of a property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

We may not have funding for future tenant improvements, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, and the value of our securities.

improvements.

When a tenant at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that, in order to attract one or more new tenants, we will be required to expend funds to construct new tenant improvements in the vacated space. Except with respect to our current reserves for capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, we cannot assure you that we will have adequate sources of funding available to us for such purposes in the future.

Bankruptcy laws will limit our remedies if a tenant becomes bankrupt and rejects the lease and we may be unable to collect balances due on our leases.

If a tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, that could diminish the income we receive from that tenant's leases.tenant’s lease. Our tenants may experience downturns in their operating results due to adverse changes to their business or economic conditions, and those tenants that are highly leveraged may have a higher possibility of filing for bankruptcy or insolvency. We may not be able to evict a tenant solely because of


Table of Contents

its bankruptcy. On the other hand, a bankruptcy court might authorize the tenant to terminate its leaseslease with us. If that happens, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid future rent would be an unsecured prepetition claim subject to statutory limitations, and therefore such amounts received in bankruptcy are likely to be substantially less than the remaining rent we otherwise were owed under the leases.lease. In addition, any claim we have for unpaid past rent could be substantially less than the amount owed. If the lease for such a property is rejected in bankruptcy, our revenue would be reduced and could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions to stockholders.

Real estate investments are not as liquid as other types of assets, which may reduce economic returns to investors.

investments.

Real estate investments are not as liquid as other types of investments, and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to react promptly to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, significant expenditures associated with real estate investments, such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investments. In addition, we intend to comply with the safe harbor rules relating to the number of properties that can be disposed of in a year, the tax bases and the costs of improvements made to these properties, and other items that enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. Thus, our ability at any time to sell assets or contribute assets to property funds or other entities in which we have an ownership interest may be restricted. This lack of liquidity may limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions and, as a result, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and our ability to pay distributions on, and the market price of, our securities.

conditions.


Acquired properties may be located in new markets where we may face risks associated with investing in an unfamiliar market.

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, properties in markets that are new to us. When we acquire properties located in these markets, we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, forging new business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local government and permitting procedures.

Uninsured losses relating to real property may adversely affect your returns.

We attempt to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. However, there are certain losses, including losses from floods, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots, that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so. In addition, changes in the cost or availability of insurance could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by the amount of any such uninsured loss, and we could experience a significant loss of capital invested and potential revenue in these properties and could potentially remain obligated under any recourse debt associated with the property. Moreover, we, as the indirect general partner of our operating partnership,Operating Partnership, generally will be liable for all of our operating partnership'sOperating Partnership’s unsatisfied recourse obligations, including any obligations incurred by our operating partnershipOperating Partnership as the general partner of joint ventures. Any such losses could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay distributions on, and the market price of, our securities. In addition, we may have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct the damaged property, and we cannot assure you that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants.


Table of Contents

Contingent or unknown liabilities could adversely affect our financial condition.

As part of the formation transactions related to our IPO, we assumed existing liabilities of contributed operating companies and liabilities in connection with contributed properties, some of which may be unknown or unquantifiable. Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions beyond the scope of our environmental insurance coverage, claims of tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the entities prior to our initial public offering,IPO, tax liabilities, and accrued but unpaid liabilities whether incurred in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. In addition, we may in the future acquire properties, or may have previously owned properties, subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based on ownership of any of these entities or properties, then we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flows.

Environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-upclean‑up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, natural resources or property damage or other costs, including investigation and clean-upclean‑up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated. A property owner who violates environmental laws may be subject to sanctions which may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, private parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be exposed to such costs. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

Environmental laws in the United StatesU.S. also require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos. Some of our properties contain asbestos-containingasbestos‑containing building materials.

We invest in properties historically used for industrial, light manufacturing and commercial purposes. Some of these properties contain, or may have contained, underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous or toxic substances. All of these operations create a potential for the release of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. Some of our properties are adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain underground storage tanks

used to store petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain of our properties are on or are adjacent to or near other properties upon which


Table of Contents

others, including former owners or tenants of our properties, have engaged, or may in the future engage, in activities that may release petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances.

From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions where we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are quantifiable and that the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjustedrisk‑adjusted return. In such an instance, we underwrite the costs of environmental investigation, clean-upclean‑up and monitoring into the cost. Further, in connection with property dispositions, we may agree to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.

        Preliminary assessments

Before acquiring a property, we typically obtain a preliminary assessment of environmental conditions at athe property that meetmeets certain specifications, are often referred to as "Phase“Phase I environmental site assessments"assessment” or "Phase“Phase I environmental assessments." They areassessment.” It is intended to discover and evaluate information regarding the environmental condition of the surveyed property and surrounding properties. A Phase I environmental assessmentsassessment generally includeincludes an historical review, a public records review, an investigation of the surveyed site and surrounding properties, and preparation and issuance of a written report, but dodoes not include soil sampling or subsurface investigations and typically dodoes not include an asbestos survey. Material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns may arise after the environmental assessment has been completed. Moreover, there can be no assurance that:

future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability; or

the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of our properties (such as releases from underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us.

Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other similar regulations could result in substantial costs.

Under the ADA, places of public accommodation must meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. If we are required to make unanticipated expenditures to comply with the ADA, including removing access barriers, then our cash flows and the amounts available for distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected. While we believe that our properties are currently in material compliance with these regulatory requirements, the requirements may change or new requirements may be imposed that could require significant unanticipated expenditures by us that will affect our cash flows and results of operations.

Fourexpenditures.

Some of our properties are subject to a ground lease that exposes us to the loss of such property upon breach or termination of the ground lease and may limit our ability to sell the property.

We own four of oursome properties through a leasehold interestinterests in the land underlying the building and we may acquire additional buildings in the future that are subject to similar ground leases. As lessee under a ground lease, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the property upon expiration, or an earlier breach by us, of the ground lease, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, and the trading price of our securities.

lease.

In the future, our ground leases may contain certain provisions that may limit our ability to sell certain of our properties. In addition, in the future, in order to assign or transfer our rights and obligations under certain of our ground leases, we may be required to obtain the consent of the landlord which, in turn, could adversely impact the price realized from any such sale.

We also own one propertyproperties that benefitsbenefit from payment in lieu of tax ("PILOT"(“PILOT”) programs or similar programs and to facilitate such tax treatment our ownership in this property is structured as a leasehold interest with the


Table of Contents

relevant municipality serving as lessor. With respect to such arrangements, we have the right to purchase the fee interest in the property for a nominal purchase price, so the risk factors set forth above for traditional ground leases are mitigated by our ability to convert such leasehold interests to fee interests. In the event of such a conversion of our ownership interests, however, any preferential tax treatment offered by the PILOT programs will be lost.

We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, including as a result of uncertain market conditions, which could adversely affect the return on your investment.

conditions.

We expect to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our investment objectives. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which you will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.


Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.

If we sell properties and provide financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows.

If we decide to sell any of our properties, we presently intend to use our best efforts to sell them for cash. However, in some instances we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. If we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could negatively impact our cash distributions to stockholders and result in litigation and related expenses. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of the proceeds of sales to our stockholders, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon a sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of.

Risks Related to Our Debt Financings

Our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to make required payments on our debt.

Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness that we may incur, and we are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flows will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness, that such refinancing would be on terms as favorable as the terms of the maturing indebtedness or that we will be able to otherwise obtain funds by selling assets or raising equity to make required payments on maturing indebtedness.

  ��     

In particular, loans obtained to fund property acquisitions may be secured by first mortgages on such properties. If we are unable to make our debt service payments as required, a lender could foreclose on the property or properties securing its debt. This could cause us to lose part or all of our investment, which in turn could cause the value of our stock to decrease and negatively impact our ability to pay distributions.investment. Certain of our existing and secured future indebtedness is, and future secured indebtedness may be, cross-collateralized and, consequently, a default on this indebtedness could cause us to lose part or all of our investment in multiple properties.


Table of Contents

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had total outstanding debt of approximately $556.1 million,$1.0 billion, including $130.5$28.0 million of debt subject to variable interest rates (excluding amounts outstanding under our unsecured term loans that were hedged to fix rates), and we expect that we will incur additional indebtedness in the future. Interest we pay reduces our cash available for distributions. Since we have incurred and may continue to incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates raise our interest costs, which reduces our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, the amount of our distributable cash flows and our financial condition would be adversely affected, and we may lose the property securing such indebtedness. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidatesell one or more of our investments in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.

Covenants in our mortgage loans, our unsecured credit facility, and unsecured term loans, unsecured notes and mortgage notes and any future debt instruments could limit our flexibility, prevent us from paying distributions, and adversely affect our financial condition or our status as a REIT.

The terms of certain of our mortgage loansnotes require us to comply with loan-to-collateral-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios and, in the case of an event of default, limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries that are borrowers under our mortgage loansnotes to make distributions to us or our other subsidiaries. In addition, our unsecured credit facility, and unsecured term loans and unsecured notes require us to comply with loan-to-collateral-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, leverage ratios, recourse indebtedness thresholds, fixed charge coverage ratios and tangible net worth thresholds and limits. Our existing loan covenants may reduce flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness even if we have satisfied our payment obligations. In addition, upon a default, our unsecured credit facility, and unsecured term loans and unsecured notes, will limit, among other things, our ability to pay dividends, even if we are otherwise in compliance with our financial covenants. Other indebtedness that we may incur in the future may contain financial or other covenants more restrictive than those in our mortgage loans, unsecured credit facility, and unsecured term loans.

        Asloans, unsecured notes and mortgage notes.

In addition, as of December 31, 2013,2016, we had certain secured loans that are cross-collateralized by multiple properties. If we default on any of these loans we may then be required to repay such indebtedness, together with applicable prepayment charges, to avoid foreclosure on all cross-collateralized properties within the applicable pool. Moreover, our unsecured credit facility, and unsecured term loans and unsecured notes contain, and future secured corporate creditborrowing facilities may contain, certain cross-default provisions which are triggered in the event that our other material indebtedness is in default. These cross-default provisions may require us

to repay or restructure the facilities in addition to any mortgage or other debt that is in default. If our properties were foreclosed upon, or if we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, the amount of our distributable cash flows and our financial conditionwe would be adversely affected.

We are a holding company and conduct all of our operations through our operating partnership.Operating Partnership. We do not have, apart from our ownership of our operating partnership,Operating Partnership, any independent operations. As a result, we will rely on distributions from our operating partnershipOperating Partnership to pay any dividends we might declare on our securities. We will also rely on distributions from our operating partnershipOperating Partnership to meet our debt service and other obligations, including our obligations to make distributions required to maintain our REIT status. The ability of subsidiaries of our operating partnershipOperating Partnership to make distributions to our operating partnership,Operating Partnership, and the ability of our operating partnershipOperating Partnership to make distributions to us in turn, will depend on their operating results and on the terms of any loans that encumber the properties owned by them. Such loans may contain lockbox arrangements, reserve requirements, financial


Table of Contents

covenants and other provisions that restrict the distribution of funds. In the event of a default under these loans, the defaulting subsidiary would be prohibited from distributing cash. For example, our subsidiaries are party to mortgage loansnotes that prohibit, in the event of default, their distribution of any cash to a related party, including our operating partnership.Operating Partnership. As a result, a default under any of these loans by the borrower subsidiaries could cause us to have insufficient cash to make the distributions required to maintain our REIT status.

If we enter into financing

Financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations it may adversely affect our ability to make distributions.

        Someus.

Most of our financing arrangements require us to make a lump-sum or "balloon"“balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and, may depend upon our abilityin the event that we do not have sufficient funds to obtain additional financing or our abilityrepay the debt at maturity of these loans, we will need to sellrefinance this debt. If the property. Atcredit environment is constrained at the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the existing financing on acceptable terms as favorable asand may be forced to choose from a number of unfavorable options. These options include agreeing to otherwise unfavorable financing terms on one or more of our unencumbered assets, selling one or more properties on disadvantageous terms or defaulting on the original loan or selland permitting the property at a price sufficientlender to make the balloon payment.foreclose. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

If mortgage debt or unsecured debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance or refinance our properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make.

properties.

If mortgage debt or unsecured debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance the purchase of properties. In addition, we run the risk of being unable to refinance mortgage debt or unsecured debt when the loans come due or of being unable to refinance such debt on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance such debt, our net income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance such debt at appropriate times, which may require us to sell properties on terms that are not advantageous to us or could result in the foreclosure of any mortgaged properties. If anyIn addition, we locked in our fixed-rate debt at a point in time when we were able to obtain favorable interest rates, principal amortization and other terms. When we refinance our debt, prevailing interest rates and other factors may result in paying a greater amount of these events occur,debt service, which will adversely affect our cash flows would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduceflow, and, consequently, our cash available for distribution to you and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.

stockholders.

Our hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with interest rates and could reduce the overall returns on your investment.

We use various derivative financial instruments to provide a level of protection against interest rate risks, but no hedging strategy can protect us completely. These instruments involve risks, such as the risk that the counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes and that a court could rule that such agreements are not legally enforceable. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% or 95% REIT income tests. In addition, the nature and timing of hedging transactions may influence the effectiveness of our hedging strategies. Poorly designed strategies or improperly executed transactions could actually increase our risk and losses. Moreover, hedging strategies involve transaction and other costs. We cannot assure you that our hedging strategy and the derivatives that we use will adequately offset the risk of interest rate volatility or that our hedging transactions will not result in losses that may reduce the overall return on your investment.


Table of Contents

U.S. Federal Income Tax Risks

Failure to qualify as a REIT would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution.

Our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet requirements regarding our organization and ownership, distributions of our income, the nature and diversification of our income and assets and other tests imposed by the Code. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year after electing REIT status, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, dividends to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends-paiddividends‑paid deduction and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.

Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income or property. For example:

To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders (which is determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain). To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on the undistributed income.

We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.

If we have net income from the sale of foreclosure property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifyingnon‑qualifying income from foreclosure property, we must pay a tax on that income at the highest corporate income tax rate.

If we sell an asset, other than foreclosure property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, our gain would be subject to the 100% "prohibited transaction"“prohibited transaction” tax unless such sale were made by our taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"(“TRS”) or if we qualify for a safe harbor from tax.

We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code.

REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.

From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to stockholders. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds, sell investments at disadvantageous prices, make taxable distributions of our stock or debt securities or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce the value of our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.


Table of Contents

To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to forego otherwise attractive opportunities, which may delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce our stockholders'stockholders’ overall return.

To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy certain tests on an ongoing basis concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, nature of our assets and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at times when it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits and the value of our stockholders'stockholders’ investment.

Recharacterization of sale-leasebacksale‑leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

In certain circumstances, we expect to purchase real properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. While we intend to structure any such sale-leasebacksale‑leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a "true lease"“true lease” for tax purposes, thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes, we cannot assure you that the

Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"(“IRS”) will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leasebacksale‑leaseback transaction is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leasebacksale‑leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification "asset tests"“asset tests” or "income tests"“income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes affecting REITs that could have a negative effect on us.

changes.

The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could adversely affect our stockholders or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our stockholders or us. New legislation, Treasury Regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

qualification, or may reduce the relative attractiveness of an investment in a REIT compared to a corporation not qualified as a REIT.

Item 1B.  UnresolvedStaff Comments

None.

Item 2.  Properties

Our target properties fit into two general categories:

Warehouse/Distribution—properties generally 200,000 to 1,000,000 square feet in size with ceiling heights between 22 feet and 36 feet and used to store and ship various materials and products.

Light Manufacturing—properties generally 75,000 to 250,000 square feet in size with ceiling heights between 16 feet and 22 feet and used to manufacture all types of goods and products.

        We target Class B properties,

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we acquired 47 buildings consisting of approximately 10.3 million square feet for approximately $471.8 million. These acquisitions had a weighted average remaining lease term of approximately 6.5 years as compared to Class A properties. The distinction between Class A industrial and Class B industrial properties is subjective. However, we consider Class A and Class B industrial properties to be as follows:

footage.

Table of Contents

Our definition of Class A and Class B may be different from those used by other companies.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we owned the properties listed below. Except as otherwise noted
State City 
Number of
Buildings
 
Asset Type(1)
 
CBSA(2)
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
Alabama           
  Montgomery 1 Warehouse / Distribution Montgomery, AL 332,000
 
  Phenix City 1 Warehouse / Distribution Columbus, GA-AL 117,568
 
Arkansas           
  Rogers 1 Warehouse / Distribution Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 400,000
 
Arizona           
  Phoenix 1 Warehouse / Distribution Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 102,747
 
California           
  Camarillo 2 Warehouse / Distribution Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 732,606
 
  Visalia 1 Warehouse / Distribution Visalia-Porterville, CA 635,281
 
Colorado           
  Golden 1 Warehouse / Distribution Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 227,500
 
  Grand Junction 1 Warehouse / Distribution Grand Junction, CO 82,800
 
  Longmont 1 Warehouse / Distribution Boulder, CO 159,611
 
Connecticut           
  Avon 1 Light Manufacturing Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 78,400
 
  East Windsor 2 Warehouse / Distribution Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 271,111
 
  North Haven 3 Warehouse / Distribution New Haven-Milford, CT 824,727
 
Delaware           
  Newark 2 Flex / Office Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 52,665
 
  New Castle 1 Warehouse / Distribution Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 485,987
 
Florida           
  Daytona Beach 1 Light Manufacturing Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 142,857
 
  Ocala 1 Warehouse / Distribution Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 619,466
 
  Orlando 1 Light Manufacturing Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 215,900
 
  Orlando 1 Warehouse / Distribution Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 155,000
 
  Pensacola 1 Flex / Office Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 30,620
 
Georgia           
  Calhoun 1 Warehouse / Distribution Calhoun, GA 151,200
 
  Dallas 1 Warehouse / Distribution Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 92,807
 
  Forest Park 2 Warehouse / Distribution Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 799,200
 
  LaGrange 1 Warehouse / Distribution LaGrange, GA 219,891
 
  Norcross 1 Warehouse / Distribution Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 152,036
 
  Savannah 1 Warehouse / Distribution Savannah, GA 504,200
 
  Shannon 1 Warehouse / Distribution Rome, GA 568,516
 
  Smyrna 1 Warehouse / Distribution Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 102,000
 
  Statham 1 Warehouse / Distribution Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 225,680
 
Idaho           
  Idaho Falls 1 Warehouse / Distribution Idaho Falls, ID 90,300
 
  Pocatello 1 Flex / Office Pocatello, ID 43,353
 
Illinois           
  Belvidere 9 Warehouse / Distribution Rockford, IL 1,133,018
 
  DeKalb 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 146,740
 
  Gurnee 2 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 562,500
 
  Harvard 1 Light Manufacturing Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 126,304
 
   Itasca 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 202,000
 
  Libertyville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 251,961
 
  Libertyville 1 Flex / Office Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 35,141
 
  Machesney Park 1 Warehouse / Distribution Rockford, IL 80,000
 

State City 
Number of
Buildings
 
Asset Type(1)
 
CBSA(2)
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
  Montgomery 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 584,301
 
  Sauk Village 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 375,785
 
  South Holland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 202,902
 
  West Chicago 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 249,470
 
  West Chicago 5 Light Manufacturing Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 305,874
 
  Wood Dale 1 Light Manufacturing Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 137,607
 
  Woodstock 1 Light Manufacturing Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 129,803
 
Indiana           
  Albion 7 Light Manufacturing Kendallville, IN 261,013
 
  Elkhart 2 Warehouse / Distribution Elkhart-Goshen, IN 170,100
 
  Kendallville 1 Light Manufacturing Kendallville, IN 58,500
 
  Fort Wayne 1 Warehouse / Distribution Fort Wayne, IN 108,800
 
  Franklin 1 Warehouse / Distribution Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 703,496
 
  Goshen 1 Warehouse / Distribution Elkhart-Goshen, IN 366,000
 
  Lafayette 3 Warehouse / Distribution Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN 466,400
 
  Marion 1 Warehouse / Distribution Marion, IN 249,600
 
  Portage 1 Warehouse / Distribution Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 212,000
 
  South Bend 1 Warehouse / Distribution South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 225,000
 
Iowa           
  Marion 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cedar Rapids, IA 95,500
 
  Sergeant Bluff 1 Flex / Office Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 148,131
 
Kansas           
  Lenexa 2 Warehouse / Distribution Kansas City, MO-KS 276,219
 
  Olathe 1 Warehouse / Distribution Kansas City, MO-KS 496,373
 
  Wichita 3 Warehouse / Distribution Wichita, KS 248,550
 
Kentucky           
  Bardstown 1 Warehouse / Distribution Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 102,318
 
  Danville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Danville, KY 757,047
 
  Erlanger 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 108,620
 
  Hebron 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 109,000
 
  Louisville 2 Warehouse / Distribution Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 497,820
 
Louisiana           
  Shreveport 1 Warehouse / Distribution Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 420,259
 
Maine           
  Belfast 5 Flex / Office  318,979
(3)
  Biddeford 2 Warehouse / Distribution Portland-South Portland, ME 265,126
 
  Gardiner 1 Warehouse / Distribution Augusta-Waterville, ME 265,000
 
  Lewiston 1 Flex / Office Lewiston-Auburn, ME 60,000
 
  Portland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Portland-South Portland, ME 100,600
 
Maryland           
  Hampstead 1 Warehouse / Distribution Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD 1,035,249
 
  Sparks 2 Flex / Office Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD 34,800
 
Massachusetts           
  Chicopee 1 Warehouse / Distribution Springfield, MA 217,000
 
  Malden 2 Light Manufacturing Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 109,943
 
  Norton 1 Warehouse / Distribution Providence-Warwick, RI-MA 200,000
 
  Stoughton 2 Warehouse / Distribution Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 258,213
 
  Westborough 1 Warehouse / Distribution Worcester, MA-CT 121,700
 
Michigan           
  Chesterfield 4 Warehouse / Distribution Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 478,803
 
  Grand Rapids 1 Warehouse / Distribution Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 301,317
 

State City 
Number of
Buildings
 
Asset Type(1)
 
CBSA(2)
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
  Holland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 195,000
 
  Holland 1 Light Manufacturing Holland, MI 177,062
 
  Kentwood 1 Light Manufacturing Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 85,157
 
  Lansing 4 Warehouse / Distribution Lansing-East Lansing, MI 770,425
 
  Marshall 1 Light Manufacturing Battle Creek, MI 57,025
 
  Novi 2 Warehouse / Distribution Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 245,860
 
  Plymouth 1 Warehouse / Distribution Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 125,214
 
  Sterling Heights 1 Warehouse / Distribution Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 108,000
 
  Walker 1 Warehouse / Distribution Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 210,000
 
  Warren 1 Warehouse / Distribution Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 268,000
 
Minnesota           
  Brooklyn Park 1 Warehouse / Distribution Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 200,720
 
  Carlos 1 Light Manufacturing Alexandria, MN 196,270
 
  New Hope 1 Light Manufacturing Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 107,348
 
  Rogers 1 Warehouse / Distribution Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 386,724
 
  Savage 1 Warehouse / Distribution Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 244,050
 
Missouri           
  Earth City 1 Warehouse / Distribution St. Louis, MO-IL 116,783
 
  Hazlewood 1 Warehouse / Distribution St. Louis, MO-IL 305,550
 
  Kansas City 1 Warehouse / Distribution Kansas City, MO-KS 226,576
 
  O'Fallon 1 Warehouse / Distribution St. Louis, MO-IL 77,000
 
Nevada           
  Reno 1 Light Manufacturing Reno, NV 87,264
 
New Hampshire           
  Londonderry 1 Warehouse / Distribution Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 125,060
 
  Nashua 1 Warehouse / Distribution Manchester-Nashua, NH 337,391
 
New Jersey           
  Burlington 2 Warehouse / Distribution Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 1,552,121
 
  Lopatcong 1 Warehouse / Distribution Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 87,500
 
  Piscataway 1 Warehouse / Distribution New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 228,000
 
New York           
  Buffalo 1 Warehouse / Distribution Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 117,000
 
  Cheektowaga 1 Warehouse / Distribution Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 121,760
 
  Farmington 1 Warehouse / Distribution Rochester, NY 149,657
 
  Gloversville 3 Warehouse / Distribution Gloversville, NY 211,554
 
  Johnstown 3 Warehouse / Distribution Gloversville, NY 169,602
 
  Johnstown 1 Light Manufacturing Gloversville, NY 42,325
 
North Carolina           
  Charlotte 4 Warehouse / Distribution Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 884,276
 
  Charlotte 1 Light Manufacturing Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 104,852
 
  Durham 1 Warehouse / Distribution Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 80,600
 
  Huntersville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 185,570
 
  Lexington 1 Warehouse / Distribution Winston-Salem, NC 201,800
 
  Mebane 2 Warehouse / Distribution Burlington, NC 606,840
 
  Mebane 1 Light Manufacturing Burlington, NC 202,691
 
  Mooresville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 300,000
 
  Mountain Home 1 Warehouse / Distribution Asheville, NC 146,014
 
  Newton 1 Warehouse / Distribution Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 187,200
 
  Pineville 1 Light Manufacturing Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 75,400
 
  Rural Hall 1 Warehouse / Distribution Winston-Salem, NC 250,000
 

State City 
Number of
Buildings
 
Asset Type(1)
 
CBSA(2)
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
  Smithfield 1 Warehouse / Distribution Raleigh, NC 191,450
 
  Winston-Salem 1 Warehouse / Distribution Winston-Salem, NC 385,000
 
Ohio           
  Boardman 1 Warehouse / Distribution Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 175,900
 
  Boardman 1 Light Manufacturing Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 95,000
 
  Cincinnati 1 Flex / Office Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 114,532
 
  Columbus 1 Warehouse / Distribution Columbus, OH 186,000
 
  Dayton 1 Warehouse / Distribution Dayton, OH 205,761
 
  Fairborn 1 Warehouse / Distribution Dayton, OH 258,680
 
  Fairfield 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 206,448
 
  Gahanna 1 Warehouse / Distribution Columbus, OH 383,000
 
  Grove City 1 Warehouse / Distribution Columbus, OH 175,512
 
  Hamilton 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 245,000
 
  Macedonia 1 Warehouse / Distribution Akron, OH 201,519
 
  Mason 1 Light Manufacturing Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 116,200
 
  North Jackson 1 Warehouse / Distribution Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 209,835
 
  North Jackson 1 Redevelopment Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 307,315
 
  Oakwood Village 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cleveland-Elyria, OH 75,000
 
  Salem 1 Light Manufacturing Salem, OH 271,000
 
  Seville 2 Warehouse / Distribution Cleveland-Elyria, OH 345,000
 
  Springfield 1 Warehouse / Distribution Springfield, OH 350,500
 
  Streetsboro 1 Warehouse / Distribution Akron, OH 343,416
 
  Strongsville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cleveland-Elyria, OH 161,984
 
  Toledo 1 Warehouse / Distribution Toledo, OH 177,500
 
  Twinsburg 1 Warehouse / Distribution Akron, OH 150,974
 
  West Chester 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 269,868
 
Oklahoma           
  Oklahoma City 2 Warehouse / Distribution Oklahoma City, OK 303,740
 
  Catoosa 1 Light Manufacturing Tulsa, OK 100,100
 
  Tulsa 1 Warehouse / Distribution Tulsa, OK 175,000
 
Oregon           
  Salem 2 Light Manufacturing Salem, OR 155,900
 
Pennsylvania           
  Allentown 1 Warehouse / Distribution Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 289,900
 
  Elizabethtown 1 Warehouse / Distribution Lancaster, PA 206,236
 
  Lancaster 1 Warehouse / Distribution Lancaster, PA 240,529
 
  Langhorne 1 Warehouse / Distribution Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 102,000
 
  Langhorne 2 Light Manufacturing Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 287,647
 
  Mechanicsburg 3 Warehouse / Distribution Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 747,054
 
  Muhlenberg Townsh 1 Warehouse / Distribution Reading, PA 394,289
 
  New Kingston 1 Warehouse / Distribution Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 330,000
 
  O'Hara Township 1 Warehouse / Distribution Pittsburgh, PA 887,084
 
  Reading 1 Warehouse / Distribution Reading, PA 248,000
 
  Williamsport 1 Warehouse / Distribution Williamsport, PA 250,000
 
South Carolina           
  Columbia 1 Light Manufacturing Columbia, SC 185,600
 
  Duncan 2 Warehouse / Distribution Spartanburg, SC 787,380
 
  Edgefield 1 Light Manufacturing Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 126,190
 
  Fountain Inn 1 Warehouse / Distribution Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 168,087
 

State City 
Number of
Buildings
 
Asset Type(1)
 
CBSA(2)
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
  Graniteville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 450,000
 
  Greenville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 157,500
 
  Greenwood 2 Light Manufacturing Greenwood, SC 175,055
 
  Greer 4 Warehouse / Distribution Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 290,000
 
  Laurens 1 Warehouse / Distribution Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 125,000
 
  Piedmont 3 Warehouse / Distribution Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 400,000
 
  Rock Hill 1 Warehouse / Distribution Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 315,520
 
  Simpsonville 2 Warehouse / Distribution Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 411,994
 
  Spartanburg 6 Warehouse / Distribution Spartanburg, SC 1,209,260
 
  Ware Shoals 1 Light Manufacturing Greenwood, SC 20,514
 
  West Columbia 3 Warehouse / Distribution Columbia, SC 569,532
 
South Dakota           
  Rapid City 1 Flex / Office Rapid City, SD 132,365
 
Tennessee           
  Chattanooga 3 Warehouse / Distribution Chattanooga, TN-GA 646,200
 
  Cleveland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Cleveland, TN 151,704
 
  Clinton 1 Warehouse / Distribution Knoxville, TN 166,000
 
  Jackson 1 Warehouse / Distribution Jackson, TN 235,855
 
  Jefferson City 1 Warehouse / Distribution Morristown, TN 486,109
 
  Knoxville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Knoxville, TN 108,400
 
  Loudon 1 Warehouse / Distribution Knoxville, TN 104,000
 
  Madison 1 Warehouse / Distribution Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 418,406
 
  Mascot 1 Warehouse / Distribution Knoxville, TN 130,560
 
  Mascot 1 Light Manufacturing Knoxville, TN 130,560
 
  Murfreesboro 1 Warehouse / Distribution Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 102,505
 
  Nashville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 150,000
 
  Portland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 414,043
 
  Vonore 1 Warehouse / Distribution Knoxville, TN 342,700
 
Texas           
  Arlington 2 Warehouse / Distribution Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 290,132
 
  Cedar Hill 1 Warehouse / Distribution Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 420,000
 
  El Paso 6 Warehouse / Distribution El Paso, TX 1,404,198
 
  Fort Worth 1 Warehouse / Distribution Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 101,500
 
  Garland 1 Light Manufacturing Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 253,900
 
  Garland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 164,914
 
  Houston 2 Warehouse / Distribution Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 352,834
 
  Houston 2 Light Manufacturing Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 408,599
 
  San Antonio 1 Warehouse / Distribution San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 247,861
 
  Waco 1 Warehouse / Distribution Waco, TX 66,400
 
Virginia           
  Buena Vista 1 Light Manufacturing  172,759
(3)
  Chester 1 Warehouse / Distribution Richmond, VA 100,000
 
  Harrisonburg 1 Warehouse / Distribution Harrisonburg, VA 357,673
 
  Independence 1 Warehouse / Distribution  120,000
(3)
Wisconsin           
  Appleton 1 Light Manufacturing Appleton, WI 113,379
 
  Chippewa Falls 2 Light Manufacturing Eau Claire, WI 97,400
 
  De Pere 1 Warehouse / Distribution Green Bay, WI 200,000
 
  DeForest 1 Warehouse / Distribution Madison, WI 254,431
 
  East Troy 1 Warehouse / Distribution Whitewater-Elkhorn, WI 149,624
 
  Germantown 1 Warehouse / Distribution Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 202,500
 

State City 
Number of
Buildings
 
Asset Type(1)
 
CBSA(2)
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
  Hartland 1 Warehouse / Distribution Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 121,050
 
  Janesville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Janesville-Beloit, WI 700,000
 
  Kenosha 1 Light Manufacturing Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI 175,052
 
  Mayville 1 Light Manufacturing Beaver Dam, WI 339,179
 
  Milwaukee 2 Warehouse / Distribution Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 117,564
 
  New Berlin 1 Warehouse / Distribution Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 205,063
 
  Sun Prairie 1 Warehouse / Distribution Madison, WI 427,000
 
  West Allis 4 Warehouse / Distribution Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 241,977
 
  Yorkville 1 Warehouse / Distribution Racine, WI 98,151
 
Total   314     60,878,204
 
(1)Flex / Office are properties that are generally 50,000 to 200,000 square feet in size and used for office space, light manufacturing, research and development and warehousing.
(2)We define Core Based Statistical Area ("CBSA") as a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget that consists of one or more counties (or equivalents) anchored by an urban center of at least 10,000 people plus adjacent counties that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting.
(3)These properties do not have a CBSA.

As of December 31, 2016, 46 of our 314 buildings were encumbered by mortgage indebtedness totaling $164.3 million (excluding unamortized deferred financing fees, debt issuance costs, and fair market value premiums). See Note 4 in the footnotes, we own fee simple interests in all ofaccompanying Notes to the properties.

State
 City Number of
Buildings
 Asset Type(12) Total Rentable
Square Feet
 

Alabama

           

 Phenix City(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  117,568 

Arkansas

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Rogers(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  400,000 

Colorado

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Golden(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  227,500 

Connecticut

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Avon(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  78,400 

 East Windsor(11)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  145,000 

Delaware

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Newark(3)  1 Flex / Office  28,653 

 Newark(3)  1 Flex / Office  24,012 

Florida

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Daytona Beach  1 Light Manufacturing  142,857 

 Ocala(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  619,466 

 Orlando(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  215,900 

 Orlando(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  155,000 

 Pensacola(3)  1 Flex / Office  30,620 

 Pensacola(3)  1 Flex / Office  7,409 

 Tavares(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  148,298 

Georgia

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Atlanta(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  407,981 

 Conyers(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  226,256 

 Dallas(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  92,807 

 LaGrange(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  249,716 

 Shannon  1 Warehouse / Distribution  568,516 

 Smyrna(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  102,000 

 Statham(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  225,680 

Idaho

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Idaho Falls(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  90,300 

 Pocatello(3)  1 Flex / Office  43,353 

Illinois

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  105,000 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  105,000 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  70,000 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  176,960 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  105,000 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  100,000 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  90,000 

 Belvidere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  255,000 

 Dekalb(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  146,740 

 Gurnee(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  223,760 
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Schedule III for additional information.

Table of Contents

State
 City Number of
Buildings
 Asset Type(12) Total Rentable
Square Feet
 

 Harvard  1 Light Manufacturing  126,304 

 Montgomery(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  584,301 

 Mt. Prospect(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  87,380 

 Sauk Village  1 Warehouse / Distribution  375,785 

 South Holland  1 Warehouse / Distribution  202,902 

 Woodstock(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  129,803 

Indiana

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Albion(3)  7 Light Manufacturing  261,013 

 Elkhart(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  18,000 

 Elkhart(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  152,100 

 Franklin(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  703,496 

 Goshen(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  366,000 

 Kendallville(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  58,500 

 Lafayette(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  71,400 

 Lafayette(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  120,000 

 Lafayette(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  275,000 

 Marion(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  249,600 

 Mishawaka(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  308,884 

 Portage(2)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  212,000 

 South Bend(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  225,000 

Iowa

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Marion(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  95,500 

 Sergeant Bluff(3)  1 Flex / Office  148,131 

Kansas

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Kansas City(9)  1 Light Manufacturing  56,580 

 Parsons(9)  1 Light Manufacturing  120,000 

 Wichita(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  80,850 

 Wichita(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  120,000 

 Wichita(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  44,760 

 Wichita(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  47,700 

Kentucky

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Danville(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  757,047 

 Georgetown(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  97,500 

 Louisville(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  191,820 

 Louisville(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  306,000 

 Bardstown(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  102,318 

Maine

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Belfast(3)  5 Flex / Office  318,979 

 Lewiston(3)  1 Flex / Office  60,000 

 Portland(10)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  100,600 

Maryland

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Hampstead(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  1,035,249 

 Sparks  2 Flex / Office  34,800 

Massachusetts

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Chicopee(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  217,000 

 Malden(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  46,129 

 Malden(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  63,814 

 Norton(6)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  200,000 

Michigan

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Auburn Hills  1 Warehouse / Distribution  87,932 

 Chesterfield(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  68,300 

 Chesterfield(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  49,612 

Table of Contents

State
 City Number of
Buildings
 Asset Type(12) Total Rentable
Square Feet
 

 Chesterfield(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  49,849 

 Chesterfield(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  311,042 

 Holland(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  307,576 

 Holland(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  195,000 

 Holland(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  198,822 

 Kentwood(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  85,157 

 Lansing(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  231,000 

 Lansing(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  129,325 

 Lansing(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  250,100 

 Lansing  1 Warehouse / Distribution  160,000 

 Marshall(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  57,025 

 Novi(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  120,800 

 Southfield(3)(13)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  113,000 

 Sterling Heights(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  108,000 

 Walker(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  210,000 

Minnesota

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Alexandria(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  172,170 

 New Hope(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  107,348 

 Rogers(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  386,724 

Mississippi

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Jackson(3)  1 Flex / Office  11,600 

 Jackson(3)  1 Flex / Office  39,909 

Missouri

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 St. Louis(5)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  305,550 

 Kansas City(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  226,576 

 O'Fallon(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  77,000 

 Hazelwood  1 Warehouse / Distribution  249,441 

New Hampshire

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Londonderry(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  125,060 

New Jersey

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Lopatcong(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  87,500 

 Piscataway(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  228,000 

New York

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Buffalo(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  117,000 

 Cheektowaga(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  121,760 

 Farmington(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  149,657 

 Gloversville(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  50,000 

 Gloversville(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  101,589 

 Gloversville(9)  1 Flex / Office  26,529 

 Gloversville(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  59,965 

 Johnstown(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  52,500 

 Johnstown(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  60,000 

 Johnstown(9)  1 Light Manufacturing  42,325 

 Johnstown(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  57,102 

North Carolina

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Charlotte(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  491,025 

 Charlotte(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  465,323 

 Huntersville(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  185,570 

 Jefferson(3)  2 Light Manufacturing  103,577 

 Lexington(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  201,800 

 Mebane(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  223,340 

 Mebane(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  202,691 

Table of Contents

State
 City Number of
Buildings
 Asset Type(12) Total Rentable
Square Feet
 

 Mebane  1 Warehouse / Distribution  383,500 

 Mooresville(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  300,000 

 Newton(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  187,200 

 Pineville(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  75,400 

 Rural Hall(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  250,000 

 Smithfield(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  191,450 

Ohio

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Bellevue(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  181,838 

 Boardman(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  175,900 

 Boardman(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  95,000 

 Canton  1 Warehouse / Distribution  448,000 

 Cincinnati(8)  1 Flex / Office  114,532 

 Dayton  1 Flex / Office  113,000 

 Gahanna(7)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  383,000 

 Salem(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  251,000 

 North Jackson(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  307,315 

 North Jackson(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  209,835 

 Seville(3)  2 Warehouse / Distribution  345,000 

 Springfield(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  350,500 

 Streetsboro(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  343,416 

 Toledo(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  177,500 

 Twinsburg(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  120,774 

Oklahoma

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Catoosa(2)(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  100,100 

Oregon

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Gresham(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  420,690 

 Salem(4)  1 Light Manufacturing  108,000 

 Salem(4)  1 Light Manufacturing  47,900 

Pennsylvania

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Muhlenberg Township(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  394,289 

 O'Hara Township(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  887,084 

 Warrendale(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  148,065 

 Williamsport(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  250,000 

South Carolina

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Duncan(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  474,000 

 Duncan(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  313,380 

 Edgefield(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  126,190 

 Greenwood(9)  1 Light Manufacturing  104,955 

 Greenwood(9)  1 Light Manufacturing  70,100 

 Orangeburg(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  319,000 

 Simpsonville(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  204,952 

 Simpsonville(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  207,042 

 Spartanburg(3)  4 Warehouse / Distribution  409,600 

 Ware Shoals(9)  1 Light Manufacturing  20,514 

 West Columbia(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  273,280 

South Dakota

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Rapid City(3)  1 Flex / Office  137,000 

Tennessee

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Cleveland(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  151,704 

 Jackson  1 Warehouse / Distribution  250,000 

 Madison(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  418,406 

 Mascot  1 Light Manufacturing  130,560 

Table of Contents

State
 City Number of
Buildings
 Asset Type(12) Total Rentable
Square Feet
 

 Nashville(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  150,000 

 Portland(3)(1)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  414,043 

 Vonore(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  342,700 

Texas

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Arlington(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  94,132 

 Arlington(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  196,000 

 El Paso(2)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  269,245 

 Fort Worth(4)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  101,500 

 Houston(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  201,574 

 Round Rock  1 Light Manufacturing  79,180 

 Waco(2)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  66,400 

Virginia

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Buena Vista(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  172,759 

 Lexington(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  15,085 

 Fairfield(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  75,221 

 Harrisonburg(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  357,673 

 Independence(9)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  120,000 

Wisconsin

 

 

  
 
 

 

  
 
 

 Appleton  1 Light Manufacturing  145,519 

 Chippewa Falls  1 Light Manufacturing  77,700 

 Chippewa Falls  1 Light Manufacturing  19,700 

 De Pere(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  200,000 

 Janesville  1 Warehouse / Distribution  700,000 

 Mayville(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  339,179 

 Milwaukee(3)  2 Warehouse / Distribution  117,564 

 Milwaukee(3)  1 Light Manufacturing  270,000 

 New Berlin(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  205,063 

 Sun Prairie(3)  1 Warehouse / Distribution  427,000 
          

    209    38,086,376 
          
          

(1)
Subject to a PILOT agreement.

(2)
Subject to ground lease.

(3)
This property is part of the borrowing base for our unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans as of February 26, 2014.

(4)
The acquisition loan facilities with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company ("CIGNA") are collateralized by this property.

(5)
The Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. loan is collateralized by this property.

(6)
The Webster Bank, N.A. loan is collateralized by this property.

(7)
The Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) loan is collateralized by this property.

(8)
The parking lot utilized by the tenant adjacent to the property is subject to a ground lease.

(9)
The Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. loan is collateralized by this property.

(10)
The Webster Bank, N.A. loan is collateralized by this property.

(11)
The Webster Bank, N.A. loan is collateralized by this property.

(12)
Flex / Office are properties that are generally 50,000 to 200,000 square feet in size and used for office space, light manufacturing, research and development and warehousing.

(13)
This property includes a vacant land parcel adjacent to the building.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information relating to diversification by propertybuilding type in our portfolio based on total annualized rent as of December 31, 2013.

Property Type
 Total
Number
of
Buildings
 Occupancy(1) Total
Occupied
Square
Feet
 Percentage of
Total
Occupied
Square
Feet
 Total
Annualized
Rent
 Annualized
Rent
Per Leased
Square Foot
 Percentage of
Total
Annualized
Rent
 

Warehouse/Distribution

  142  95.9% 30,600,349  84.0%$111,454,981 $3.64  80.2%

Light Manufacturing

  47  95.9% 4,827,541  13.3% 17,426,002  3.61  12.5%

Flex/Office

  20  87.2% 992,636  2.7% 10,156,590  10.23  7.3%
                

Total/Weighted Average

  209  95.6% 36,420,526  100.0%$139,037,573 $3.82  100.0%
                
                

2016.
(1)
Calculated as the average economic occupancy weighted by each property's rentable square footage. As used herein, economic occupancy includes all square footage where an existing lease is in place whether or not such square footage is physically occupied.

    Square Footage   Total Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Building Type Number of Buildings Square Feet % 
Occupancy Rate(1)
 
Amount
(in thousands)
 %
Warehouse/Distribution 243
 53,674,674
 88.2% 95.6% $201,208
 87.0%
Light Manufacturing 54
 5,925,629
 9.7% 96.3% 23,120
 10.0%
Total Operating Portfolio 297
 59,600,303
 97.9% 95.7% $224,328
 97.0%
             
Redevelopment 1
 307,315
 0.5% 
 
 
Flex/Office 16
 970,586
 1.6% 62.6% 6,994
 3.0%
Total/weighted average 
 314
 60,878,204
 100.0% 94.7% $231,322
 100.0%
(1)We define Occupancy Rate as the percentage of total leasable square footage for which the lease term has commenced as of the close of the reporting period.
Geographic Diversification

        The following table sets forth information relating to geographic diversification by state in our portfolio based on total annualized rent as of December 31, 2013.

 
 Total
Number
of
Buildings
 Occupancy(1) Total
Occupied
Square
Feet
 Percentage of
Total
Occupied
Square
Feet
 Total
Annualized
Rent
 Annualized
Rent
Per Leased
Square Foot
 Percentage of
Total
Annualized
Rent
 

Illinois

  16  97.9% 2,823,935  7.6%$12,354,820 $4.38  8.9%

North Carolina

  14  100.0% 3,260,876  8.6% 12,083,896 $3.71  8.7%

Ohio

  16  93.1% 3,368,162  9.5% 11,584,014 $3.44  8.3%

Michigan

  18  90.5% 2,473,474  7.2% 9,992,712 $4.04  7.2%

Indiana

  19  100.0% 3,020,993  7.9% 9,558,624 $3.16  6.9%

Wisconsin

  11  96.8% 2,421,860  6.6% 7,988,442 $3.30  5.7%

South Carolina

  14  100.0% 2,523,013  6.6% 7,566,354 $3.00  5.4%

Pennsylvania

  4  100.0% 1,679,438  4.4% 6,853,299 $4.08  4.9%

Tennessee

  7  92.6% 1,719,315  4.9% 5,729,015 $3.33  4.1%

Florida

  7  100.0% 1,319,550  3.5% 5,621,339 $4.26  4.0%

All Others

  83  92.6% 11,809,910  33.2% 49,705,058 $4.21  35.9%
                

  209  95.6% 36,420,526  100.0% 139,037,573 $3.82  100.0%
                
                

(1)
Calculated as the average economic occupancy weighted by each property's rentable square footage.

Table of Contents

    Industry Diversification

        The following table sets forth information relating to tenant diversification by industry in our portfolio based on total annualized rent as of December 31, 2013.

Industry
 Total
Number
of
Leases(1)
 Total Leased
Square Feet
 Percentage of
Leased Square
Feet
 Total
Annualized
Rent
 Percentage of
Total
Annualized
Rent
 

Automotive

  31  4,412,530  12.1%$17,388,493  12.5%

Containers & Packaging

  18  4,278,904  11.7% 15,458,583  11.1%

Industrial Equipment, Component & Metals

  29  3,589,712  9.9% 14,704,932  10.6%

Air Freight & Logistics

  19  3,547,099  9.8% 12,905,517  9.3%

Food & Beverages

  12  2,929,147  8.0% 10,689,402  7.7%

Retail

  12  2,551,756  7.0% 7,993,510  5.7%

Business Services

  10  1,369,823  3.8% 7,889,170  5.7%

Office Supplies

  10  2,020,973  5.5% 6,827,580  4.9%

Building Materials

  12  1,660,481  4.6% 6,043,035  4.3%

Aerospace & Defense

  14  1,387,700  3.8% 5,826,731  4.2%

Household Durables

  7  1,698,530  4.7% 5,636,987  4.1%

Personal Products

  6  1,664,466  4.6% 5,566,635  4.0%

Healthcare

  9  1,123,204  3.1% 4,837,802  3.5%

Finance

  3  429,045  1.2% 3,634,612  2.6%

Technology

  6  805,769  2.2% 2,909,443  2.1%

Media & Entertainment

  3  1,016,876  2.8% 2,572,954  1.9%

Non-Profit/Government

  6  196,413  0.5% 1,863,148  1.3%

Education

  3  69,862  0.2% 572,549  0.4%

Recreational Goods

  2  121,776  0.3% 258,471  0.2%

Other

  10  1,546,460  4.2% 5,458,019  3.9%
            

Total/Weighted Average

  222  36,420,526  100.0%$139,037,573  100.0%
            
            

(1)
A single lease may cover space in more than one building.

Tenants

        Our portfolio of properties has a stable and diversified tenant base. As of December 31, 2013, our properties were 95.6% leased to 191 tenants in a variety of industries, with no single tenant accounting for more than 2.8% and no single industry accounting for more than 12.6% of our total annualized rent. Our 10 largest tenants account for approximately 16.7% of our annualized rent. We intend to continue to maintain a diversified mix of tenants to limit our exposure to any single tenant or industry. As of December 31, 2013, 57% of our tenants (or parents thereof) were publicly rated and 30% were investment grade rated based on annualized rent.


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information about the 10ten largest states in our portfolio based on total annualized base rental revenue as of December 31, 2016.

Top Ten States Number of CBSA's % of Total Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Illinois 2
 8.2%
Ohio 9
 7.5%
South Carolina 6
 7.4%
Pennsylvania 7
 6.9%
Texas 5
 6.0%
North Carolina 7
 5.8%
Michigan 5
 5.4%
Wisconsin 10
 5.3%
New Jersey 3
 4.9%
Tennessee 6
 4.9%
Total 60
 62.3%


Industry Diversification

The following table sets forth information about the ten largest tenant industries in our portfolio based on total annualized base rental revenue as of December 31, 2016.
Top Ten Tenant Industries
% of Total
Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Automotive13.6%
Ind Equip, Component & Metals11.3%
Air Freight & Logistics11.2%
Containers & Packaging9.6%
Food & Beverages8.7%
Retail7.2%
Personal Products6.6%
Household Durables5.3%
Business Services5.2%
Non-Profit/Government3.6%
Total82.3%

Tenant Diversification

As of December 31, 2016, our buildings were leased to 275 tenants. The following table sets forth information about the ten largest tenants in our portfolio based on total annualized rentbase rental revenue as of December 31, 2013.

2016.

Tenants
 Number
of
Leases
 Total Leased
Square Feet
 Percentage of
Total
Leased Square
Feet
 Total
Annualized
Rent
 Percentage of
Total
Annualized
Rent
 

Solo Cup Company

  1  1,035,249  2.8%$3,809,716  2.7%

International Paper Company

  2  573,323  1.6% 2,952,291  2.1%

Bank of America, N.A. 

  1  318,979  0.9% 2,404,538  1.8%

Spencer Gifts, LLC

  1  491,025  1.4% 2,122,404  1.5%

Jacobson Warehouse Company LLC

  2  578,687  1.6% 2,119,712  1.5%

Closetmaid Corporation

  2  619,466  1.7% 2,053,400  1.5%

Stream International Inc. 

  1  148,131  0.4% 1,999,769  1.5%

Armacell, LLC

  3  518,838  1.4% 1,989,527  1.4%

American Beverage Corp

  1  613,200  1.7% 1,876,392  1.3%

Archway Marketing Serv., Inc

  1  386,724  1.1% 1,857,989  1.4%
            

Total

  15  5,283,622  14.6%$23,185,738  16.7%
            
            
Top Ten Tenants 
Number of
Leases
 
% of Total
Annualized Base
Rental Revenue
General Service Administration 1 3.1%
XPO Logistics Supply Chain Inc. 4 2.2%
Deckers Outdoor Corporation 2 1.8%
Solo Cup Company 1 1.7%
Generation Brands, LLC 1 1.1%
Exel Logistics 3 1.1%
Perrigo Holland 2 1.0%
American Tire Distributors Inc. 4 1.0%
Spencer Gifts, LLC 1 1.0%
Armacell, LLC 3 0.9%
Total 22 14.9%

As of December 31, 2013,2016, our weighted average in-placein place remaining lease term was approximately 4.84.2 years. For the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, we have achieved approximately a 59%69.5% tenant retention rate for those tenants whose leases were scheduled to expire in 2013.2016. The following table sets forth a summary schedule of lease expirations for leases in place as of December 31, 2013,2016, plus available space, for each of the 10ten calendar years beginning with 20132017 and thereafter in our portfolio (dollars in thousands, except per square foot data).portfolio. The information set forth in the table assumes that tenants exercise no renewal options, and nopurchase options, or early termination rights.

Year Lease of Expiration
 Number of
Leases
Expiring
 Total
Rentable
Square Feet
 Expiring
Percentage of
Total
Square Feet
 Total
Annualized
Rent
 Percentage of
Total
Annualized
Rent
 Total
Annualized
Rent per
Leased Square
Foot
 

Available

  0  1,665,850             

MTM(1)

  4  71,825  0.2%$196,440  0.1%$2.73 

2014(2)

  27  2,892,847  7.6% 11,594,411  8.3%$4.01 

2015

  30  5,013,856  13.2% 15,388,346  11.1%$3.07 

2016

  35  4,634,298  12.2% 18,719,464  13.5%$4.04 

2017

  30  5,188,090  13.6% 20,341,351  14.6%$3.92 

2018

  31  4,970,706  13.0% 18,838,839  13.5%$3.79 

2019

  9  1,834,492  4.8% 8,837,917  6.4%$4.82 

2020

  8  2,478,222  6.5% 9,122,651  6.6%$3.68 

2021

  14  2,892,038  7.6% 12,871,530  9.3%$4.45 

2022

  9  1,238,920  3.2% 4,710,967  3.4%$3.80 

Thereafter

  25  5,205,232  13.7% 18,415,657  13.2%$3.54 
              

Total/Weighted Average

  222  38,086,376  95.6%$139,037,573  100.0%$3.82 
              
              

(1)
Month-to-month leases.

(2)
Four leases containing 190,971 square feet expired on December 31, 2013. These leases are considered occupied on December 31, 2013; therefore, the expirations will not factor into period ending occupancy until 2014.
Lease Expiration Year 
Number of
Leases
Expiring
 
Total Rentable
Square Feet
 
% of Total
Occupied
Square Feet
 
Total Annualized
Base Rental Revenue
(in thousands)
 
% of Total Annualized
Base Rental Revenue
Available  3,254,516
 
 
 
Month-to-month leases 7 281,824
 0.5% $885
 0.4%
2017 45 5,393,284
 9.4% 22,956
 9.9%
2018 65 11,038,428
 19.2% 43,394
 18.8%
2019 52 9,642,460
 16.7% 37,175
 16.1%
2020 34 7,931,114
 13.8% 33,024
 14.3%
2021 39 6,468,139
 11.2% 27,361
 11.8%
2022 24 3,331,130
 5.8% 13,737
 5.9%
2023 12 2,537,340
 4.4% 9,005
 3.9%
2024 9 2,152,791
 3.7% 7,709
 3.3%
2025 11 1,788,742
 3.1% 7,550
 3.3%
2026 13 2,930,441
 5.1% 10,728
 4.6%
Thereafter 19 4,127,995
 7.1% 17,798
 7.7%
Total/weighted average 330 60,878,204
 100.0% $231,322
 100.0%

Table of Contents

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are a party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to any legal proceedings which,that, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if determined adversely to our company.

Item 4.  Mine SafetyDisclosures

Not applicable.



PART II.

Item 5.  Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Information about our equity compensation plans and other related stockholder matters is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20142017 Annual Stockholders' Meeting.

Meeting of Stockholders.

Market Information

Our common stock has been listed on the NYSE since April 15, 2011, and is traded under the symbol "STAG."“STAG.” The closing share price for our common stock on February 24, 2014,14, 2017, as reported by the NYSE, was $22.98.$23.94. For the year ended December 31, 2016, our total stockholder return was 38.0%, assuming an investment in our common stock on December 31, 2015 and that all dividends were reinvested. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices in dollars on the NYSE for our common stock as well as the dividends declared per share of common stock.

 
 High Low Dividends per
common share(1)
 

Quarter ended December 31, 2013

 $22.45 $19.28 $0.30(2)

Quarter ended September 30, 2013

 $22.32 $18.76 $0.30 

Quarter ended June 30, 2013

 $24.35 $19.30 $0.30 

Quarter ended March 31, 2013

 $22.19 $17.97 $0.30 

Quarter ended December 31, 2012

 $19.07 $16.01 $0.27 

Quarter ended September 30, 2012

 $16.50 $14.04 $0.27 

Quarter ended June 30, 2012

 $15.07 $12.34 $0.27 

Quarter ended March 31, 2012

 $14.17 $11.44 $0.26 

(1)
On December 18, 2013, our board of directors approved a 5% increase in our annual common stock dividend from the 2013 annual rate of $1.20 per share to $1.26 per share commencing with the payment of the January 2014 common stock dividend to be paid in February 2014.
Quarter ended High Low 
Dividends Per
Common Share(1)
December 31, 2016 $24.41
 $21.21
 $0.347499
September 30, 2016 $25.51
 $22.68
 $0.347499
June 30, 2016 $23.83
 $19.42
 $0.347499
March 31, 2016 $20.54
 $14.97
 $0.347499
December 31, 2015 $21.13
 $18.01
 $0.345000
September 30, 2015 $21.29
 $16.66
 $0.345000
June 30, 2015 $23.81
 $19.89
 $0.337500
March 31, 2015 $27.61
 $22.28
 $0.337500
(1)On November 2, 2016, our board of directors declared the common stock dividend for the months ending January 31, 2017, February 28, 2017 and March 31, 2017 at a monthly rate of $0.116667 per share of common stock. On February 15, 2017, our board of directors declared the common stock dividend for the months ending April 30, 2017, May 31, 2017, and June 30, 2017, at a monthly rate of $0.116667 per share of common stock.


(2)
On September 24, 2013, our board of directors declared dividends for each month of the fourth quarter of $0.10 per share, which equates to $0.30 per share on a quarterly basis.

Holders of Our Common Stock


As of February 24, 2014,14, 2017, we had approximately 4165 stockholders of record. This figure does not reflect the beneficial ownership of shares held in the nominee name.


Table of Contents

Dividends


To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our taxable net income (not including net capital gains). We had adopted a policy of paying regular quarterly dividends on our common stock, and we had adopted a policy of paying regular quarterly distributions on the common units of our operating partnership. On August 15, 2013, our board of directors voted to increase the frequency of the payment of dividends on our common stock and common units from quarterly to monthly commencing with the fourth quarter of 2013. Cash distributions have been paid on our common stock and common units since our initial public offering. Dividends are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and depend on actual and anticipated cash from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and other factors our board of directors may consider relevant.


Common Units and Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

        During the year ended December 31, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 2,186 shares of common stock in connection with the redemption of 2,186 common units of limited partnership held by certain limited partners of our operating partnership. The shares of common stock issued upon redemption of common units of limited partnership interest were registered with the SEC on our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-181291), which was declared effective on May 18, 2012.

        On June 19, 2013, in connection with our acquisition of eight buildings, our operating partnership issued 555,758 common units. The issuance of the common units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We relied on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the common units. Common units may be redeemed for cash or, at our election, our common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment, as provided in the operating partnership agreement.


None.

Performance Graph

The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor'sPoor’s 500 Index and the MSCI US REIT Index, and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Industrial Index. The MSCI US REIT Index represents performance of publicly traded REITs while the FTSE NAREIT Equity Industrial Index represents only the performance of our peers, publicly traded industrialpublicly-traded REITs. Stockholders' returnsReturns over the indicated period are based on historical data and should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns. The graph covers the period from April 15,December 31, 2011 to December 31, 20132016 and assumedassumes that $100 was invested in STAG Industrial, Inc.our common stock and in each index on April 15,December 31, 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested.


Table of Contents

        The actual returns shown on the graph above are as follows:

Index
 4/15/2011 6/30/2011 9/30/2011 12/30/2011 3/30/2012 6/29/2012 9/28/2012 12/31/2012 3/28/2013 6/28/2013 9/30/2013 12/31/2013 

STAG Industrial, Inc. 

 $100.00 $95.82 $81.79 $94.05 $116.65 $124.13 $140.79 $157.97 $189.63 $180.53 $184.73 $189.88 

S&P 500

 $100.00 $100.89 $86.89 $97.16 $109.39 $106.38 $113.14 $112.71 $124.67 $128.29 $135.02 $149.22 

MSCI US REIT Index

 $100.00 $104.01 $88.90 $102.48 $113.48 $117.74 $117.74 $120.69 $130.43 $128.37 $124.51 $123.67 

FTSE NAREIT Equity Industrial Index

 $100.00 $100.86 $71.96 $85.83 $106.74 $102.82 $108.43 $113.46 $126.68 $120.36 $121.94 $121.87 

This performance graph shall not be deemed "filed"“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.


Table of Contents

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data


The following sets forth selected financial and operating data for our company on a historical consolidated basis. The following data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and Notes thereto and "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The company'sOur selected historical Consolidated Balance Sheet information as of December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, and the company'sour selected historical Consolidated Statement of Operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, have been derived from the audited financial statements of STAG Industrial, Inc. The selected historical Combined Balance Sheet information as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, andCertain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the selected historical Combined Statements of Operations data for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, has been derived from the audited Combined Financial Statements of the


Table of Contents

STAG Predecessor Group.current year presentation. The results of operations for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect discontinued operations:

operations.

 
  
  
  
 STAG Predecessor Group 
 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. 
 
  
 Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  
  
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31,
2011
 Period from
January 1, 2011 to
April 19,
2011
 
 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 
 
 2010 2009 

Statement of Operations Data:

                   

Revenue

                   

Total revenue

 $133,893 $84,052 $41,116 $7,707 $25,919 $27,356 
              

Expenses

                   

Property

  24,010  12,841  7,180  2,067  6,122  7,213 

General and administrative

  17,840  14,549  8,365  484  874  981 

Property acquisition costs

  3,427  4,218  1,088       

Depreciation and amortization

  67,556  42,427  21,325  2,345  8,931  9,640 

Loss on impairment

    622         

Other expenses

  621  339  294       
              

Total expenses

  113,454  74,996  38,252  4,896  15,927  17,834 
              

Other income (expense)

                   

Interest income

  13  19  28  1  16  66 

Interest expense

  (20,319) (16,110) (11,829) (3,825) (12,817) (12,913)

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps

    215  2,179  762  (282) (1,720)

Formation transaction costs

      (3,674)      

Offering costs

  (27) (68) (78)      

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    (929)        
              

Total other income (expense)

  (20,333) (16,873) (13,374) (3,062) (13,083) (14,567)
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 $106 $(7,817)$(10,510)$(251)$(3,091)$(5,045)
              

Total Income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations

  4,796  (2,382) 1,283  22  145  (515)
              

Net income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)$(229)$(2,946)$(5,560)
              
              

Less: preferred stock dividends

  9,495  6,210  1,018          

Less: amount allocated to unvested restricted stockholders

  262  122            
                 
                 

Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends

  (620) (3,720) (3,396)         
                 
                 

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $(4,235)$(12,811)$(6,849)         
                 
                 

Net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to the common stockholders

 $(0.20)$(0.44)$(0.49)         
                 
                 

Income (loss) per share from discontinued operation attributable to common stockholders

  0.10  (0.07) 0.05          
                 
                 

Net loss per share attributable to the common stockholders

 $(0.10)$(0.51)$(0.44)         
                 
                 

Balance Sheet Data (End of Period):

                   

Rental property, before accumulated depreciation

 $1,079,046 $816,227 $502,258 $ $210,186 $210,009 

Rental property, after accumulated depreciation

  1,007,393  770,052  472,254    190,925  195,383 

Total assets

  1,270,281  1,005,124  624,514    211,004  220,116 

Total debt

  556,091  479,215  296,779    207,550  212,132 

Total liabilities

  595,717  515,664  314,605    219,340  221,637 

Total equity (deficit)

  674,564  489,460  309,909    (8,336) (1,521)

Other Data:

                   

Dividend declared per common share

 $1.20 $1.07 $0.7257 $ $ $ 

Cash flow provided by operating activities

 $82,687 $48,011 $14,666 $2,359 $9,334 $8,365 

Cash flow used in investing activities

  (325,231) (417,203) (114,458) (581) (2,088) (2,040)

Cash flow (used in) provided by financing activities

  230,228  371,700  116,013  (3,070) (8,451) (6,921)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 
2015(1)
 
2014(1)
 2013 2012
Statements of Operations Data:          
Revenue          
Total revenue $250,243
 $218,633
 $173,816
 $133,893
 $84,052
Expenses          
Property 48,904
 42,627
 33,388
 24,010
 12,841
General and administrative 33,395
 28,750
 26,396
 17,867
 14,617
Property acquisition costs 4,567
 4,757
 4,390
 3,427
 4,218
Depreciation and amortization 125,444
 110,421
 87,703
 67,556
 42,427
Loss on impairments 16,845
 29,272
 2,840
 
 622
Other expenses 1,149
 1,048
 803
 621
 339
Total expenses 230,304
 216,875
 155,520
 113,481
 75,064
Other income (expense)          
Interest income 10
 9
 15
 13
 19
Interest expense (42,923) (36,098) (25,109) (20,319) (16,110)
Gain on interest rate swaps 
 
 
 
 215
Loss on extinguishment of debt (3,261) 
 (686) 
 (929)
Gain on the sales of rental property, net 61,823
 4,986
 2,799
 
 
Total other income (expense) 15,649
 (31,103) (22,981) (20,306) (16,805)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations $35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685) $106
 $(7,817)
Total income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations 
 
 
 4,796
 (2,382)
Net income (loss) $35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685) $4,902
 $(10,199)
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends 1,069
 (1,962) (992) (620) (3,720)
Less: preferred stock dividends 13,897
 10,848
 10,848
 9,495
 6,210
Less: amount allocated to participating securities 384
 385
 345
 262
 122
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $20,238
 $(38,616) $(14,886) $(4,235) $(12,811)
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to the common stockholders — basic and diluted $0.29
 $(0.58) $(0.28) $(0.20) $(0.44)
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operation attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted 
 
 
 0.10
 (0.07)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $0.29
 $(0.58) $(0.28) $(0.10) $(0.51)
Balance Sheets Data (December 31):          
Rental property, before accumulated depreciation and amortization $2,541,705
 $2,188,642
 $1,809,895
 $1,389,214
 $1,059,715
Rental property, after accumulated depreciation and amortization $2,116,836
 $1,839,967
 $1,558,434
 $1,222,360
 $957,607
Total assets $2,186,156
 $1,901,782
 $1,623,802
 $1,266,460
 $1,003,342
Total debt $1,036,139
 $980,248
 $680,478
 $552,270
 $477,433
Total liabilities $1,119,230
 $1,043,925
 $731,924
 $591,896
 $513,882
Total equity $1,066,926
 $857,857
 $891,878
 $674,564
 $489,460
Other Data:          
Dividend declared per common share $1.389996
 $1.365
 $1.29
 $1.20
 $1.07
Cash flow provided by operating activities $135,423
 $121,707
 $96,676
 $82,687
 $48,011
Cash flow used in investing activities $(347,112) $(372,038) $(421,713) $(325,231) $(417,203)
Cash flow provided by financing activities $211,870
 $238,464
 $342,225
 $230,228
 $371,700
(1)These amounts are revised as shown in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysisof Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. The combined financial information presented for periods on or prior to April 19, 2011 relate solely to the STAG Predecessor Group. The consolidated financial statements for the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013 include the financial information of our company, our operating partnership and our subsidiaries. Where the "company" is referenced in comparisons of financial results between the year ended December 31, 2012 and any quarter or period ended in 2011, the financial information for such quarter or period prior to April 19, 2011 relates solely to the STAG Predecessor Group, notwithstanding "company" being the reference.


Overview


We are a fully-integrated, full-service real estate companyREIT focused on the acquisition, ownership, and managementoperation of single-tenant, industrial properties throughout the United States.

        As of December 31, 2013, we owned 209 buildings in 34 states with approximately 38.1 million rentable square feet, consisting of 142 warehouse/distributionU.S. We seek to (i) identify properties 47 light manufacturing propertiesthat offer relative value across all locations, industrial property types, and 20 flex/office properties. We also owned one vacant land parcel adjacent to onetenants through the principled application of our buildings. Ourproprietary risk assessment model, (ii) operate our properties were 95.6% leased to 191 tenants, with no single tenant accounting for more than 2.8%in an efficient, cost-effective manner, and (iii) capitalize our business appropriately given the characteristics of our total annualized rent and no single industry accounting for more than 12.6% of our total annualized rent.

assets. We were formed asare a Maryland corporation on July 21, 2010 and our operating partnership, of which we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, STAG Industrial GP, LLC, arecommon stock is publicly traded on the sole general partner, was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on December 21, 2009. On April 20, 2011, we completedNYSE under the formation transactions and became a public company. At December 31, 2013, we owned an 86.65% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. symbol “STAG.”


We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, and generally are not subject to federal income tax to the extent we currently distribute our income to our stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

 We remain subject to state and local taxes on our income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.


Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating results, qualification tests in the federal income tax laws. Those tests involve the percentage of income that we earn from specified sources, the percentage of our assets that falls within specified categories, the diversity of our capital stock ownership and the percentage of our earnings that we distribute.

As of December 31, 2016, we owned 314 buildings in 37 states with approximately 60.9 million rentable square feet, consisting of 243 warehouse/distribution buildings, 54 light manufacturing buildings, 16 flex/office buildings, and one building in redevelopment. As of December 31, 2016, our buildings were approximately 94.7% leased to 275 tenants, with no single tenant accounting for more than approximately 3.1% of our total annualized base rental revenue and no single industry accounting for more than approximately 13.6% of our total annualized base rental revenue.

We own our interests in all of our properties and conduct substantially all of our business through our Operating Partnership. We are the sole member of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2016, we owned approximately 95.7% of the common equity of our Operating Partnership, and our current and former executive officers, directors, senior employees and their affiliates, and third parties who contributed properties to us in exchange for common equity in our Operating Partnership, owned the remaining 4.3%. We completed our IPO and related formation transactions, pursuant to which we succeeded to the business of our predecessor, on April 20, 2011.

Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations


Our ability to increase revenues or cash flow will depend in part on our (i) external growth, specifically acquisition activity and (ii) internal growth, specifically occupancy and rental rates on our portfolio.  A variety of other factors, including those noted below, also affect our future results of operations.

Outlook


The outlook for our business remains positive, albeit on a moderated basis in light of continued slow economic growth, some uncertainty regarding the new U.S. presidential administration and its policy initiatives, and continued asset appreciation. The federal funds target rate was raised 25 basis points in December; however, the target rate remains very low, in a range of 0.50% to 0.75%. This range aligns with the Central Bank’s consistent commentary that future rate hikes would be gradual and rates will likely remain historically low for an extended period of time. At the same time, its most recent commentary suggests increasing comfort with hiking rates again in the near future. If interest rates were to rise further as a result of Federal Reserve policy action (short-term interest rates) or changes in market expectations and capital flows (long-term interest rates), we believe strengthening economic conditions are likely to accompany these changes. This strengthening of economic conditions combined with the currently favorable industrial supply/demand environment should translate to a net positive result for our business. Specifically, our existing portfolio should benefit from rising rental rates and our acquisition activity should benefit from higher yields. Furthermore, we believe certain characteristics of our business should position us well in a rising interest rate environment, including the fact that we have minimal floating rate debt exposure (taking into account our hedging activities) and that many of our competitors for the assets we purchase tend to be smaller local investors who are likely to be more heavily impacted by interest rate increases.


The results of the U.S. presidential election was largely unanticipated by the media, and it remains unclear what impact new policies will have on the economy. The positive capital market moves since the election appear to indicate net favorable expectations on key areas, including corporate tax, healthcare, regulation, infrastructure, and trade. Other notable items with economic impacts include the continued relative strength of the U.S. dollar versus competing currencies (including the euro and pound), the continuation of relatively low oil prices, and Brexit. A strong U.S. dollar can harm U.S. exporters and U.S. multi-nationals; however, it can also benefit foreign multi-nationals positively, which support U.S. subsidiaries and operate U.S. industrial properties. Oil price declines over the past two years and the lack of a sustained rebound in price have put significant pressure on oil and gas exploration and production companies, resulting in many oil and gas sector bankruptcies, while simultaneously benefiting many industries (e.g. automotive, freight) and consumers’ disposable incomes. In June, the passing of the U.K.’s referendum to separate itself from the European Union, known as Brexit, was a major surprise to the markets. The process to renegotiate financial and economic relationships and the resulting outcomes will take many years to unfold. Right now, the decline in value of the pound is a short-term benefit to U.K. exporters. The long-term impacts on the U.S. and global economy are unclear. We believe our direct exposure to the U.K. market is limited. Of our tenants that do have direct exposure to the U.K., we believe they are well-diversified businesses. We will continue to monitor these trends for short-term and long-term impacts to us.

Several economic indicators and other factors provide insight into the U.S. economic environment and industrial demand. Presently, we believe the key factors include gross domestic product ("GDP") growth rate, unemployment rate, non-farm payrolls, Conference Board consumer confidence index, manufacturing-purchasing manager index (“ISM”), the 10-year Treasury yield, U.S. total vehicle sales, and durable goods new orders. Below are recent trends in each of these factors.
Economic Indicators(1)
December 31, 2016September 31, 2016June 30, 2016March 31, 2016December 31, 2015
GDP Growth Rate
(2)
3.5%1.4%0.8%0.9%
Unemployment Rate4.7%4.9%4.9%5.0%5.0%
Change in Non-Farm Employment (in thousands)156.0208.0271.0186.0271.0
Consumer Confidence Index113.3104.197.496.196.3
ISM(3)
54.7%51.5%53.2%51.8%48.0%
10-year Treasury Yield2.45%1.60%1.49%1.78%2.27%
Seasonally Adjusted Annualized Rate US Total Vehicle Sales  (in thousands)18,68018,05917,16117,03217,830
Manufacturing New Orders: Durable Goods  (in millions)227,108228,204219,055228,499223,402
(1)Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Conference Board, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Census Bureau, and Institute for Supply Management.  Each statistic is the latest revision available at the time of publishing this report.
(2)This statistic was not available at the time of publishing this report.
(3)ISM is a composite index based on a survey of over 300 purchasing and supply executives from across the country who respond to a monthly questionnaire about changes in production, new orders, new export orders, imports, employment, inventories, prices, lead-times, and timelines of supplier deliveries in their companies.  When the index is over 50, it indicates expansion, while a reading below 50 signals contraction.

Currently, the GDP growth rate, growing non-farm employment, strong U.S. total vehicle sales, ISM level, consumer confidence, and low interest rates are positive fundamental signs for industrial demand. Expanding job count and the ongoing low unemployment rate suggests consumers will be spending more money on goods in the foreseeable future. The strengthening U.S. dollar means that U.S. consumers may be purchasing a relatively larger amount of imported goods and that U.S. companies are likely to lower their rate of exports. This is likely to be a net positive for industrial real estate demand as imports tend to lead to greater net absorption than do exports. At the end of December 2016, the consumer confidence index reached a 13-year high and the ISM level reached its highest level in two years. On the negative side, the 2016 speculative grade corporate default rate surpassed its long-term average and reached 5.1%, significantly driven by oil and gas and mining industry defaults. We expect default rates to be stable in the coming year behind positive economic growth. However, we believe improving commodity markets and capital markets stability will be important in supporting this outlook. We also note that while automotive sales closed the year strong, they have moderated their growth in recent months and we are seeing many large multinational companies experience weak organic growth, commonly due to negative currency effects and commodity price deflation. We believe the combination of these observations signal some caution in underlying economic strength; however, we still expect an increase in industrial activity and more demand for industrial space in the foreseeable future given the job growth, low-interest rate environment, and GDP growth.

Several industrial specific trends contribute to the expected demand increase, including:

an increasing attractiveness of the U.S. as a manufacturing and distribution location because of the size of the U.S. consumer market, an increase in overseas labor costs and the overall cost of supplying and shipping goods (i.e. the shortening and fattening of the supply chain);
the overall quality of the transportation infrastructure in the U.S.; and
the rise of e-commerce (as compared to the traditional retail store distribution model) and the concomitant demand by e-commerce industry participants for well-located, functional distribution space.

Furthermore, the lack of material speculative development generally acrossin most of our markets and the country and specificallybroader failure of supply to keep pace with demand in many of our markets may improve occupancy levels and rental rates in our owned portfolio. In addition, our acquisition activity is expected to enhance our overall financial performance. The continuation of low interest rates combined with the availability of attractively priced properties should allow us to deploy our capital on an attractive "spread investing" basis. In general, the economic environment for our tenants appears to be improving due in particular to the increasing availability of financing accessible by mid-sized companies. Additionally, based on variousWe believe, however, that industrial supply, more so than other real estate publications,property types, has historically had a short lead time and can appear quickly. We have started to see a notable pick-up in development activity in a growing number of the outlookmore active industrial markets, but this has yet to take firm hold on a broader scale. We will continue to monitor the supply and demand fundamentals for the industrial real estate sector is positive asand assess its impact on our business.

Conditions in Our Markets

The buildings in our portfolio are located in markets throughout the United States economy continues to improveStates. Positive or negative changes in economic or other conditions, new supply, adverse weather conditions and as retailersnatural disasters and manufacturers have made the shortening of the supply chain their top priority for the foreseeable future.

    other factors in these markets may affect our overall performance.


Rental Revenue

Income


We receive income primarily in the form of rental income from rental revenue fromthe tenants who occupy our properties.buildings. The amount of rental revenueincome generated by the propertiesbuildings in our portfolio depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease currently available space.rental rates. As of December 31, 2013,2016, our properties wereOperating Portfolio was approximately 95.6% leased. The amount of rental revenue generated95.7% leased and our lease rates as defined by us also dependsGAAP on our ability to maintain or increase rental rates at our properties.new and renewal leases together grew approximately 7.3% and 7.2% during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Future economic


Table of Contents

downturns or regional downturns affecting our submarkets that impair our ability to renew or re-lease space and the ability of our tenants to fulfill their lease commitments, as in the case of tenant bankruptcies, could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase rental rates at our properties.

buildings. Our ability to lease our properties and the attendant rental rate is dependent upon, among other things, (i) the overall economy, (ii) the supply/demand dynamic in our markets, (iii) the quality of our properties, including age, clear height, and configuration, and (iv) our tenants’ ability to meet their contractual obligations to us.



The following table provides a summary of our Operating Portfolio leases executed during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Certain leases entered into by us contain tenant concessions. Anyrental concessions; any such rental concessions are accounted for on a straight linestraight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Operating Portfolio Square Feet 
Cash
Basis Rent Per
Square Foot
(1)
 
GAAP Basis Rent Per
Square Foot
(2)
 
Total Turnover Costs Per
Square
Foot
(3)
 
Cash
Rent Change
(1)
 
GAAP Rent Change(2)
 
Weighted Average Lease
Term
(4)
(years)
 
Rental Concessions per Square Foot(5)
        
Year ended December 31, 2016                
New Leases(6)
 749,275
 $3.90
 $4.16
 $2.25
 (0.5)% 4.0% 8.2
 $0.42
Renewal Leases(7)
 4,817,462
 4.02
 4.14
 0.56
 1.4 % 7.4% 4.8
 0.15
Total/weighted average 5,566,737
 $4.00
 $4.14
 $0.79
 1.3 % 7.3% 5.3
 $0.18
Temporary Leases(8)
 1,329,245
              
Total leasing activity��6,895,982
              
Year ended December 31, 2015                
New Leases(6)
 1,393,810
 $3.40
 $3.28
 $1.85
 10.8 % 18.3% 7.9
 $0.44
Renewal Leases(7)
 2,921,673
 3.89
 4.04
 0.60
 (0.8)% 4.7% 4.1
 0.06
Total/weighted average 4,315,483
 $3.73
 $3.87
 $1.01
 1.4 % 7.2% 5.4
 $0.18
Temporary Leases(8)
 1,234,600
              
Total leasing activity 5,550,083
              
(1)
We define Cash Basis Rent Change as the percentage change in base rent (excluding straight-line rent adjustments and above/below market lease amortization as required by GAAP) of the Comparable Lease. We define a Comparable Lease as a lease with a similar lease structure as compared to the previous in-place lease, excluding new leases for space that was not occupied under our ownership, leases on space with downtime in excess of two years, leases with materially different lease structures, leases associated with known vacates at the time of acquisition, and leases with credit-related modifications.
(2)We define GAAP Rent Change as the percentage change in the average base rent over the contractual lease term (excluding above/below market lease amortization) of the Comparable Lease.
(3)We define Turnover Costs as the costs for improvements of vacant and renewal spaces, as well as the commissions for leasing transactions. Turnover Costs per square foot represent the total turnover costs expected to be incurred on the leases signed during the period and do not reflect actual expenditures for the period.
(4)We define Weighted Average Lease Term as the contractual lease term in years as of the lease start date weighted by square footage.
(5)Represents the total concession (free rent) for the entire lease term.
(6)We define a New Lease as any lease that is signed for an initial term equal to or greater than twelve months for any vacant space; this includes a new tenant or an existing tenant that is expanding into new (additional) space.
(7)We define a Renewal Lease as a lease signed by an existing tenant to extend the term for twelve months or more, including (i) a renewal of the same space as the current lease at lease expiration, (ii) a renewal of only a portion of the current space at lease expiration and (iii) an early renewal or workout, which ultimately does extend the original term for twelve months or more.
(8)We define a Temporary Lease or a License Agreement as any lease that is signed for an initial term of less than twelve months; this includes short-term new leases and short-term renewal leases.

Property Operating Expenses

Our property operating expenses generally consist of utilities, real estate taxes, management fees, insurance and site repair and maintenance costs. For the majority of our tenants, our property operating expenses are controlled, in part, by the triple net provisions in tenant leases. In our triple net leases, the tenant is responsible for all aspects of and costs related to the building and its operation during the lease term, including utilities, taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. However, we also have modified gross leases and gross leases in our building portfolio. The terms of those leases vary and on some occasions we may absorb building related expenses of our tenants. In our modified gross leases, we are responsible for some building related expenses during the lease term, but the cost of most of the expenses is passed through to the tenant for reimbursement to us. In our gross leases, we are responsible for all costs related to the building and its operation during the lease term. Our overall performance will be affected by the extent to which we are able to pass-through property operating expenses to our tenants.

Scheduled Lease Expirations


Our ability to re-lease space subject to expiring leases will impact our results of operations and is affected by economic and competitive conditions in our markets and by the desirability of our individual buildings. Leases that comprise approximately 9.9% of our total annualized base rental revenue will expire during the period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, excluding month to month leases. We assume, based upon internal renewal probability estimates that some of our tenants will renew and others will vacate and the associated space will be re-let subject to downtime assumptions. Assuming we do not dispose of any of these buildings, we expect that the rental rates on the respective new leases will generally be lower than the rates under existing leases expiring during the period January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, thereby resulting in lower revenue from the same space.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had approximately 1.73.3 million rentable square feet of currently available space in our buildings. Of the 2.8approximately 5.2 million square feet of leases that have expired during the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, we have renewed 1.6

approximately 3.6 million square feet ofsubject to leases, resulting in a 59%69.5% Operating Portfolio tenant retention rate as offor the year ended December 31, 2013.2016.  As of December 31, 2013,2016, for the period January 1, 2014 through2017 to December 31, 2014, one2017, none of our top ten tenantsleases, based on December 31, 20132016 total annualized base rental revenue, had their only lease expire in 2014. will be expiring.  

Tenant Retention

The following table provides a summary of our Operating Portfolio tenant signed a new leaseretention for fivethe years to retain 47% of the space effective at the existing lease expiration. The base rent will remain flat on a per square foot basis. Subsequent toended December 31, 2013, the tenant executed the first amendment to the lease, which allows the tenant to holdover in the entire space through April 30,2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014.

    Conditions in Our Markets

        The properties in our portfolio are located in markets throughout the United States. Positive or negative changes in economic or other conditions, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters in these markets may affect our overall performance.

    Rental Expenses

        Our rental expenses generally consist of utilities, real estate taxes, management fees, insurance and site repair and maintenance costs. For the majority of our tenants, our rental expenses are controlled, in part, by the triple net provisions in tenant leases. In our triple net leases, the tenant is responsible for all aspects of and costs related to the property and its operation during the lease term, including utilities, taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. However, we also have modified gross leases and gross leases in our property portfolio. The terms of those leases vary and on some occasions we may absorb property related expenses of our tenants. In our modified gross leases, we are responsible for some property related expenses during the lease term, but the cost of most of the expenses is passed through to the tenant for reimbursement to us. In our gross leases, we are responsible for all aspects of and costs related to the property and its operation during the lease term. Our overall performance will be impacted by the extent to which we are able to pass-through rental expenses to our tenants.

Operating Portfolio Tenant Retention 
Retention %(1)
 Weighted Average Lease Term (years) Expiring Square Feet 
Renewal Square Feet(2)
 Cash Rent Change GAAP Rent Change
Year ended December 31, 2016 69.5% 4.7
 5,210,736
 3,620,369
 3.0% 8.2%
Year ended December 31, 2015 69.5% 2.8
 4,895,033
 3,401,317
 4.5% 8.9%
Year ended December 31, 2014 70.8% 3.5
 3,295,096
 2,331,698
 5.8% 8.5%
Total/weighted average 69.8% 3.7
 13,400,865
 9,353,384
 4.2% 8.5%
(1)We define Retention as the percentage determined by taking Renewal Lease square footage commencing in the period divided by square footage of leases expiring in the period. Neither the Renewal Leases nor leases expiring include Temporary Leases or License Agreements. Retention excludes leases associated with known vacates at the time of acquisition, leases with credit-related modifications, and early terminations.
(2)We define Renewal Square Feet as the square footage of renewal leases commencing during the period, irrespective of the date signed.

Critical Accounting Policies


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.


Table of Contents

Real Estate

Rental Property and Deferred LeaseLeasing Intangibles

        Real estate investments are


Rental property is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The cost of real estate includes the purchase price of the property and leasehold improvements. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Significant renovations and betterments that extend the economic useful lives of assets are capitalized.

We capitalize costs directly related to the development, pre-development, redevelopment or improvement of rental property. Real estate taxes, compensation costs of development personnel, insurance, interest, and other directly related costs during construction periods are capitalized as incurred and depreciated commencing with the date the property is substantially completed. Such costs begin to be capitalized to the development projects from the point we are undergoing the necessary activities to get the development project ready for its intended use and cease when the development projects are substantially completed and held available for occupancy. Interest is capitalized based on actual capital expenditures from the period when development or redevelopment commences until the asset is ready for its intended use, at the weighted average borrowing rate of our unsecured indebtedness during the period.

For properties classified as held for sale, we cease depreciating and amortizing the rental property and value the rental property at the lower of depreciated and amortized cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. We present those properties classified as held for sale with any qualifying assets and liabilities associated with those properties as held for sale in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We allocate the purchase price of business combinations of properties based upon the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings, tenant improvements, mortgage debt assumed, and deferred leasing intangibles, which includes in-place leases, above market and below market leases, and tenant relationships. The portion of the purchase price that is allocated to above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease term plus the term of any bargain renewal options. The above and below market lease values are amortized into rental income over the remaining term plus the terms of bargain renewal options or assumed exercise of early termination options of the respective leases. The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and its overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships,

which are included as components of deferred leasing intangibles, are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships or assumed exercise of early termination options for in-place lease intangibles) as increases to depreciation and amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of above and below market leases is accelerated into rental income and the in-place lease value and tenant relationships are accelerated into depreciation or amortization expense over the shortened lease term.

The purchase price allocated to deferred leasing intangible assets are included in rental property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the purchase price allocated to deferred leasing intangible liabilities are included in deferred leasing intangibles on our Consolidated Balance Sheets under the liabilities section.

In determining the fair value of the debt assumed, we discount the spread between the future contractual interest payments and hypothetical future interest payments on mortgage debt based on a current market rate. The associated fair market value debt adjustment is amortized through interest expense over the life of the debt on a basis which approximates the effective interest method.

Using information available at the time of acquisition, we allocate the total consideration to tangible assets and liabilities and identified intangible assets and liabilities, as discussed above. We may adjust the preliminary purchase price allocations after obtaining more information about asset valuations and liabilities assumed.

We evaluate the carrying value of all tangible and intangible real estate assets held for use for possible impairment when an event or change in circumstance has occurred that indicates their carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes estimating and reviewing anticipated future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the asset and the ultimate sale of the asset. If such cash flows are less than the asset'sasset’s carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent by which the asset'sasset’s carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Estimating future cash flows is highly subjective and such estimates could differ from actual results.

        For properties considered held for sale, we cease depreciating the properties


Depreciation and value the properties at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. We classify properties as held for sale when all criteria within the FASB's Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") 360,Property, Plant and Equipment are met.

        We present qualifying assets and liabilities and the results of operations that have been sold, or otherwise qualify as "held for sale," as discontinued operations in all periods presented if the property operations are expected to be eliminated and we will not have significant continuing involvement following the sale. The components of the property's net income (loss) are reflected as discontinued operations include operating results, depreciation and interest expense (if the property is subject to a secured loan).

        Expenditures for tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing commissions are capitalized and amortized or depreciated over the shorter of their useful lives or the terms of each specific lease. Depreciationamortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:

lives.

BuildingsBuilding40 yearsYears
Building and land improvements5 -Up to 20 years
Tenant improvementsShorter of useful life or terms of related lease
Above and below market leases and other deferred leasing intangiblesTerms of the related lease plus terms of bargain renewal options or assumed exercise of early termination options
Tenant relationshipsTerms of the related lease plus estimated renewal period
Assumed debt fair value premium/discountTerms of the related loan

        We evaluate acquisitions to determine if the acquisition represents an asset acquisition or business combination, and we account for all business combinations in accordance with ASC 805,Business Combinations. Upon acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price


Goodwill

The excess of the property based upon the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings, tenant improvements and intangible assets including in-place leases, above market and below market leases and tenant relationships, as well as the fair value of debt assumed. We allocate the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assetscost of an acquired property by valuingbusiness over the propertynet of the amounts assigned to assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as if it were vacant. Acquired abovegoodwill. Our goodwill of $4.9 million represents amounts allocated to the assembled workforce from the acquired management company, and below market leases are valued basedis presented in prepaid expenses and other assets on the present valueaccompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Goodwill has an indeterminate life and is not amortized, but is tested for impairment on an annual basis at December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. We take a qualitative approach to consider whether an impairment of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equalgoodwill exists prior to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below market fixed rate renewal options for below market leases that are considered bargain renewal options. The above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the below market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options that are considered bargain renewal options of the respective leases.


Table of Contents

        The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and our overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of deferred leasing intangibles, are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of leasing commissions, above and below market leases, the in-place lease value and tenant relationships are immediately written off.

        Inquantitatively determining the fair value of the debt assumed, we discount the spread between the future contractual interest payments and hypothetical future interest payments on mortgage debt based on a current market rate. The associated fair market value debt adjustment is amortized through interest expense over the lifereporting unit in step one of the debt.

        Using information available at the time of acquisition, we allocate the total considerationimpairment test. We have not recorded any impairments to tangible assets and liabilities and identified intangible assets and liabilities. We may adjust the preliminary purchase price allocations after obtaining more information about asset valuations and liabilities assumed.

goodwill through December 31, 2016.



Use of Derivative Financial Instruments


We record all derivatives on the balance sheetaccompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. We may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting

accounting.


In accordance with the FASB's fair value measurement guidance, we made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of our derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting arrangements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. Credit risk is the risk of failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the contract. We minimize the credit risk in anthe interest rate swapswaps by entering into transactions with various high-quality counterparties. Our exposure to credit risk at any point is generally limited to amounts recorded as assets or liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant accounts receivable, interest rate swaps, accounts payable, accrued expenses, unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes and mortgage notes. The fair values of the cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their carrying or contract values because of the short term maturity of these instruments. See Note 4 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the fair values of our debt. See Note 5 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the fair values of our interest rate swaps.

We adopted the fair value measurement provisions for itsour financial instruments recorded at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.


Table


We grant equity-based compensation awards to our employees and directors in the form of Contents

restricted shares of common stock, LTIP units, outperformance programs, and performance units. See Notes 6, 7 and 8 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of restricted shares of common stock, LTIP units, and the outperformance programs and performance units, respectively. We measure equity-based compensation expense based on the fair value of the awards on the grant date and recognize the expense ratably over the vesting period, and forfeitures are recognized in the period in which they occur.


Revenue Recognition


All current leases are classified as operating leases and rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease (and expected bargain renewal terms or assumed exercise of early termination options) when collectability is reasonably assured. Differences between rental revenue earned and amounts due under the lease are charged or credited, as applicable, to accrued rental revenue. Additional rents from expense reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses are recognized in the period in which the related expenses are incurred.


Early lease termination fees are recorded in rental income on a straight-line basis from the notification date of such termination to the then remaining (not the original) lease term, if any, or upon collection if collection is not reasonably assured.


We earn revenue from asset management fees, which are included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in other income. We recognize revenue from asset management fees when the related fees are earned and are realized or realizable.



By the terms of their leases, certain tenants are obligated to pay directly the costs of their properties'properties’ insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses and these costs are not reflected in our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. To the extent any tenant responsible for these costs under its respective lease defaults on its lease or it is deemed probable that the tenant will fail to pay for such costs, we would record a liability for such obligation. We do not recognize recovery revenue related to leases where the tenant will pay expenses directly for real estate taxes, insurance, ground lease payments, and certain other expenses.


Results of Operations


Our results of operations are largely driven by our levels of occupancy as well as the rental rates we receive from tenants. From a rental rate standpoint, we have historically achieved overall rental increases in our tenant rollovers on a cash basis and GAAP basis.

The following discussion of our results of operationsour same store net operating income (“NOI”) should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements. For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the Consolidated and Combinedreasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see “Non-GAAP Financial Statements and the accompanying footnotes.Measures” below. We consider our same store (as defined below) portfolio to consist of only those industrial buildings owned and operated at the beginning and at the end of both of the applicable periods presented.  Same store results are considered to be useful to investors in evaluating our performance because they provide information relating to changes in building-levelproperty level operating performance without taking into account the effects of acquisitions or dispositions.

 However, because we have generally acquired 100% occupied properties and have grown the portfolio significantly every year since our initial public offering, our same store results do not represent a market portfolio with market occupancy. Because we have above market same store occupancy, our same store results may look unfavorable at times as we trend to market levels. We encourage the reader to not only look at our same store results, but also our total portfolio results, due to historic and future growth.


Comparison of the year ended December 31, 20132016 to the year ended December 31, 20122015


Our results of operations are affected by the acquisition and disposition activity during the 20132016 and 20122015 periods as described below.  On January 1, 2012, we owned 105 buildings including 57 warehouse/distribution buildings, 28 light manufacturing buildings and 20 flex/office buildings. Subsequent to January 1, 2012, we sold five buildings for which the results of operations are included in income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations and are not considered partThe following discussion of our same store portfolio. Therefore, there are 100portfolio excludes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and those classified as held for sale on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. On December 31, 2016 we owned 204 industrial buildings consisting of 40,957,663 square feet, which represents approximately 67.3% of our total portfolio, that are considered our same store portfolio in the analysis below. Same store occupancy decreased 0.7%approximately 1.1% to 93.0%95.3% as of December 31, 20132016 compared to 93.7%96.4% as of December 31, 2012. The results of operations from acquisitions relates to the 109 buildings acquired after January 1, 2012 for an aggregate cost of approximately $767.2 million.

2015. 


The following table summarizes selected operating information for our same store portfolio and our total portfolio for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 20122015 (dollars in thousands). This table includes a reconciliation from our same store portfolio to our total portfolio by


Table of Contents

also providing information for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 20122015 with respect to the buildings acquired and disposed of after January 1, 2012.

 
 Same Store Portfolio Acquisitions Total Portfolio 
 
 Year ended
December 31,
  
  
 Year ended
December 31,
 Year ended
December 31,
  
  
 
 
 2013 2012 Change % Change 2013 2012 2013 2012 Change % Change 

Revenue

                               

Operating revenue

                               

Rental income

 $57,664 $59,270 $(1,606) -2.7%$58,680 $14,707 $116,344 $73,977 $42,367  57.3%

Tenant recoveries

  9,354  7,419  1,935  26.1% 6,995  1,344  16,349  8,763  7,586  86.6%

Other income(1)

  283  92  191  207.6% 24  24  307  116  191  164.7%
                      

Total operating revenue

  67,301  66,781  520  0.8% 65,699  16,075  133,000  82,856  50,144  60.5%
                      

Expenses

                               

Operating expenses

                               

Property

  7,250  5,333  1,917  35.9% 3,384  650  10,634  5,983  4,651  77.7%

Real estate taxes and insurance

  6,265  5,491  774  14.1% 7,111  1,367  13,376  6,858  6,518  95.0%
                      

Total operating expenses

  13,515  10,824  2,691  24.9% 10,495  2,017  24,010  12,841  11,169  87.0%
                      

Net operating income(2)

 $53,786 $55,957 $(2,171) -3.9%$55,204 $14,058 $108,990 $70,015 $38,975  55.7%

Other expenses (income)

                               

General and administrative

                    17,840  14,549  3,291  22.6%

Asset management fees income

                    (893) (1,196) 303  -25.3%

Property acquisition costs

                    3,427  4,218  (791) -18.8%

Depreciation and amortization

                    67,556  42,427  25,129  59.2%

Loss on impairment

                      622  (622) 0.0%

Other expenses

                    621  339  282  83.2%
                            

Total other expenses (income)

                    88,551  60,959  27,592  45.3%
                            

Total expenses

                    112,561  73,800  38,761  52.5%
                            

Other income (expense)

                               

Interest income

                    13  19  (6) -31.6%

Interest expense

                    (20,319) (16,110) (4,209) 26.1%

Gain on interest rate swaps

                      215  (215) 0.0%

Offering costs

                    (27) (68) 41  0.0%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

                      (929) 929  -100.0%
                            

Total other income (expense)

                    (20,333) (16,873) (3,460) 20.5%
                            

Discontinued operations

                               

Income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations

                    (509) 1,337  (1,846) -138.1%

Loss on impairment attributable to discontinued operations                          

                      (3,941) 3,941  -100.0%

Gain on sales of real estate

                    5,305  222  5,083  0.0%
                            

Total income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations

                    4,796  (2,382) 7,178  -301.3%
                            

Net income (loss)

                   $4,902 $(10,199)$15,101  148.1%
                            

Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends

                    (620) (3,720) 3,100  -83.3%
                            

Net income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc

                   $5,522 $(6,479)$12,001  -185.2%
                            
                            

2015 and our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and those classified as held for sale.
(1)
Other income excludes asset management fee income, which is included below in Other expenses (income) for purposes of calculating net operating income.

(2)
Net operating income excludes the results of discontinued operations
 Same Store Portfolio Acquisitions/Dispositions 
Other (1)
 Total Portfolio
 Year ended December 31, Change Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31, Change
 2016 2015 $ % 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 $ %
Revenue                       
Operating revenue                       
Rental income$148,670
 $147,322
 $1,348
 0.9 % $56,743
 $29,746
 $7,328
 $9,395
 $212,741
 $186,463
 $26,278
 14.1 %
Tenant recoveries24,317
 23,317
 1,000
 4.3 % 10,282
 5,754
 2,508
 2,595
 37,107
 31,666
 5,441
 17.2 %
Other income102
 84
 18
 21.4 % 71
 25
 222
 395
 395
 504
 (109) (21.6)%
Total operating revenue173,089
 170,723
 2,366
 1.4 % 67,096
 35,525
 10,058
 12,385
 250,243
 218,633
 31,610
 14.5 %
Expenses                     
  
Property30,036
 30,280
 (244) (0.8)% 13,920
 8,235
 4,948
 4,112
 48,904
 42,627
 6,277
 14.7 %
Net operating income (2)
$143,053
 $140,443
 $2,610
 1.9 % $53,176
 $27,290
 $5,110
 $8,273
 201,339
 176,006
 25,333
 14.4 %
Other expenses                       
General and administrative               33,395
 28,750
 4,645
 16.2 %
Property acquisition costs               4,567
 4,757
 (190) (4.0)%
Depreciation and amortization               125,444
 110,421
 15,023
 13.6 %
Loss on impairments               16,845
 29,272
 (12,427) (42.5)%
Other expenses               1,149
 1,048
 101
 9.6 %
Total other expenses               181,400
 174,248
 7,152
 4.1 %
Total expenses               230,304
 216,875
 13,429
 6.2 %
Other income (expense)                       
Interest income                10
 9
 1
 11.1 %
Interest expense                (42,923) (36,098) (6,825) 18.9 %
Loss on extinguishment of debt               (3,261) 
 (3,261) 100.0 %
Gain on the sales of rental property, net               61,823
 4,986
 56,837
 1,139.9 %
Total other income (expense)               15,649
 (31,103) 46,752
 150.3 %
Net income (loss)                $35,588
 $(29,345) $64,933
 221.3 %
(1)Includes flex/office buildings, and redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale, which are excluded from the same store portfolio. Also includes corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income, which are separated for purposes of calculating NOI.
(2)Excluding corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income, NOI for the total portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $201.1 million and $175.4 million, respectively. Corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income are included in rental income and other income, respectively, in the table above. For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

Net income (loss) for our total portfolio increased by $64.9 million or 221.3% to a net income position of $35.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to a net loss position of $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. For a detailed discussionreconciliation of our same store portfolio to net operating income including(loss), see the reasons management believes net operating income is useful to investors, see "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below.table on the previous page.


    Same Store Total Operating Revenue


Same store operating revenue consists primarily of rental income from our properties, lease termination fees and tenant reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses.


Table of Contents

        Same store(i) rental income consisting of base rent, termination income, straight-line rent and above and below market lease amortization decreasedfrom our properties, and (ii) tenant reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses (“tenant recoveries”).


For a detailed reconciliation of our same store portfolio to net income (loss), see the table on the previous page.

Same store rental income increased by $1.6$1.3 million or 2.7%0.9% to $57.7$148.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, compared to $59.3$147.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. Approximately $3.7 million of the increase was attributable to rental increases due to new leases and renewals of existing tenants. Same store rental income decreased primarilyalso increased approximately $0.4 million due to a net decrease in the amortization of net above market leases and approximately $0.1 million due to the recognition of a straight-line termination fee at our Golden, CO property, as a resultdiscussed in Note 2 of vacancies and downtime in between leases resulting in a decrease of revenue of approximately $2.5 million. This decrease wasthe accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partially offset by an approximately $1.0$3.0 million decrease due to a reduction of lease expansionsbase rent due to tenants downsizing their spaces and renewals at higher rental rates. There was also a decrease in net above market lease amortization of $0.2 million. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2012, we had termination income of approximately $0.3 million and there was no termination income within income from continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2013.

vacancies.


Same store tenant recoveries increased by $1.9$1.0 million or 26.1%4.3% to $9.4$24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, compared to $7.4$23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The2015. This increase wasis primarily attributablerelated to onean increase of the properties where a single tenant occupied the building during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the tenant paid the utility expenses andapproximately $2.1 million related to increases of real estate taxes directlylevied by the related taxing authority, occupancy in previously vacant buildings, as well as changes to lease terms where we began paying the third parties; therefore, the expenses were not directly paid by us. The tenant vacated during the fourth quarter of 2012 and the same building was occupied by multiple tenants during the year ended December 31, 2013 with leases that require us to pay the utility and real estate taxes and operating expenses on behalf of tenants that had previously paid its taxes and to be reimbursed by the tenant, resulting in an increase of $1.3 million. The remaining net increase was primarily attributable to $0.6 million of increases in real estate tax income related to increased real estate tax rates, changes in leases where tenants paidoperating expenses directly to third parties and now the expenses are being paid by us and recovered from the tenant during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, and therespective vendors. These increases were partially offset by tenanta decrease of approximately $1.1 million related to decreases of real estate taxes levied by the related taxing authority and vacancies.

        Same store other income increased by $0.2 million or 207.6% to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This was primarily as a result of the reimbursement of makes ready repair costs from tenants that vacated and settlements received in 2013 from prior tenants for reimbursement of damages under the lease agreement.


Same Store Operating Expenses


Same store operating expenses consist primarily of property operating expenses and real estate taxes and insurance.


For a detailed reconciliation of our same store portfolio to net income (loss), see the table on the previous page.

Total same store expenses increaseddecreased by $2.7$0.2 million or 24.9%0.8% to $13.5$30.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, compared to $10.8$30.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was2015. This decrease is primarily related to a decrease of approximately $0.1 million in snow removal expenses attributable to a more mild winter in 2016 as compared to 2015, as well as a decrease of approximately $0.3 million in general repairs and maintenance expenses. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in utilities andof approximately $0.2 million related to increases of real estate taxes of $1.1 million related to one of the properties where a single tenant occupied the building during the year ended December 31, 2012 and the tenant paid the utility expenses directly to the third parties; therefore, the expenses were not directly paid by us. The tenant vacated during the fourth quarter of 2012 and the same building was occupied by multiple tenants during the year ended December 31, 2013 with leases that require us to pay the utility and real estate tax expenses and to be reimbursedlevied by the tenants. Additionally, there was an increase of $0.8 million related taxing authority and changes to repair and maintenance work completed in preparation of a new tenant at one building. Real estate taxes and utility expenses had a net increase $0.4 million across several properties primarily due to net increases in utility usage as well as utility rates and real estate tax rates. Real estate taxes increased by $0.4 million across several properties primarily due to changes in leaseslease terms where prior tenants paidwe began paying the real estate taxes on behalf of tenants that had previously paid its taxes directly to the taxing authority.

Acquisitionsand utilities directlyDispositionsNet Operating Income

For a detailed reconciliation of our acquisitions and dispositions portfolio to net income (loss), see the table on the previous page.

Subsequent to January 1, 2015, we acquired 96 buildings consisting of approximately 19.0 million square feet, and sold 30 buildings consisting of approximately 5.0 million square feet. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the buildings acquired after January 1, 2015 contributed approximately $46.4 million and $14.6 million to NOI, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the buildings sold after January 1, 2015 contributed approximately $6.8 million and $12.7 million to NOI, respectively. Refer to Note 3 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding buildings acquired or sold.

Other Net Operating Income

Our other assets include our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale. It also includes corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income, which are directly paid by us.

    separated for purposes of calculating NOI for the total portfolio.


For a detailed reconciliation of our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale to net income (loss), see the table on the previous page.

At December 31, 2016 we owned 15 flex/office buildings consisting of approximately 0.9 million square feet and one redevelopment building consisting of approximately 0.3 million square feet that are not included in our same store or acquisitions and dispositions portfolios. These building contributed approximately $4.9 million and $7.7 million to NOI for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Additionally, we earned $0, $0.2 million, $0.2 million, and $0.4 million in corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Total Other Expenses (Income)


Total other expenses (income) consist of general and administrative expense, asset management fee income, property acquisition costs, depreciation and amortization, loss on impairments, and other expenses. General and administrative expense includes non-cash compensation expense related restricted stock, LTIP units, and the OPP. The unrecognized non-cash compensation expense associated with these awards was


Table of Contents

$8.0 million as of December 31, 2013 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.3 years.

Total other expenses (income) increased $27.6$7.2 million or 45.3%4.1% for the year ended December 31, 20132016 to $88.6$181.4 million compared to $61.0$174.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. The increase was primarily related to an increase of $25.1$15.0 million in depreciation and amortization as a result of the buildings acquired, net of buildings disposed, which increased the depreciable asset base. TheApproximately $4.6 million of the increase was also attributablerelates to a $3.3 millionan increase in general and administrative expenses, primarily related to compensation expense of approximately $3.1 million related to the increase in payroll and otherseverance costs related to an increased number of a former executive officer during the year ended December 31, 2016, as well as the 2016 equity grants for employees and increased sizeindependent directors. These increases are partially offset by a decrease of approximately $12.4 million in loss on impairments recorded due to the Company.

    impairment of 12 buildings for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the impairment of 14 buildings for the year ended December 31, 2015.


Total Other Income (Expense)


Total other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest expense, and loss on extinguishment of debt.debt, and gain on the sales of rental property. Interest expense includes interest paid and accruedincurred during the period as well as adjustments related to amortization of financing fees and debt issuance costs and amortization of fair market value adjustments associated with the assumption of debt.


Total other expenseincome (expense) increased $3.5$46.8 million or 20.5%,150.3% to $20.3a net other income of $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016 compared to $16.9a net other expense of $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The2015. This increase wasis primarily attributable to a $4.2 millionthe result of an increase in interest expense primarily as a resultthe gain on the sales of rental property of approximately $56.8 million due to the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan entered into on February 14, 2013 and the Banksales of America unsecured term (each as defined inIndebtedness Outstanding below) loan entered into on September 10, 2012, which24 buildings, whereas there were not outstanding for the majority of 2012. Additionally,six buildings sold during the year ended December 31, 2012, we had2015. This was partially offset by a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million and a partially offsetting gain on an interest rate swap of $0.2 million that matured during 2012.

    Total Income (Loss) Attributable to Discontinued Operations

        The total income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations reflects the results of operations related to the sale of five buildings located in Creedmoor, NC, Pittsburgh, PA, Youngstown, OH and Great Bend, KS (two buildings) during 2013 and 2012. The total income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations increased by $7.2 million, which was primarily a result of the gain on sales associated with the Pittsburgh, PA and Creedmoor, NC buildings in the amount of $0.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively, that were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013. The gain on sales was partially offset by net loss attributable to discontinued operations in the amount of $0.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we had a loss attributable to discontinued operations of $2.4 million, which was primarily the result of a $3.9 million loss on impairment that was incurred on the two Great Bend, KS properties prior to the disposal in the fourth quarter of 2012 offset by $1.3 million of income from discontinued operations and a gain on sale of approximately $0.2 million from the Youngstown, OH building.

    Total Net Income (Loss)

        The total net income (loss) increased by $15.1 million, or 148.1%, to net income of $4.9$3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, whereas there was no loss on extinguishment of debt during the year ended December 31, 2015. This was also partially offset by an increase in interest expense of approximately $6.8 million related to the increase in total average debt outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.


Comparison of year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2014

Our results of operations are affected by the acquisition and disposition activity during the 2015 and 2014 periods as described below.  The following discussion of our same store portfolio excludes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and those classified as held for sale on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. On December 31, 2015 we owned 179 industrial buildings consisting of 35,600,752 square feet, which represented approximately 65.1% of our total portfolio, that are considered our same store portfolio in the analysis below. Same store occupancy remained flat at 95.2% as of December 31, 2015 compared to 95.2% as of December 31, 2014. 

The following table summarizes selected operating information for our same store portfolio and our total portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands). This table includes a reconciliation from our same store portfolio to our total portfolio by also providing information for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 with respect to the buildings acquired and disposed of after January 1, 2014 and our flex/office buildings.

 Same Store Portfolio Acquisitions/Dispositions 
Other (1)
 Total Portfolio
 Year ended December 31, Change Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31, Change
 2015 2014 $ % 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 $ %
Revenue                                                  
Operating revenue 
  
  
  
  
  
      
  
    
Rental income$123,257
 $122,439
 $818
 0.7 % $54,048
 $18,121
 $9,158
 $8,910
 $186,463
 $149,470
 $36,993
 24.7 %
Tenant recoveries17,948
 18,493
 (545) (2.9)% 11,133
 2,919
 2,585
 2,195
 31,666
 23,607
 8,059
 34.1 %
Other income92
 104
 (12) (11.5)% 27
 32
 385
 603
 504
 $739
 (235) (31.8)%
Total operating revenue141,297
 141,036
 261
 0.2 % 65,208
 21,072
 12,128
 11,708
 218,633
 173,816
 44,817
 25.8 %
Expenses                     
  
Property25,942
 25,734
 208
 0.8 % 11,968
 3,681
 4,717
 3,973
 42,627
 33,388
 9,239
 27.7 %
Net operating income (2)
$115,355
 $115,302
 $53
  % $53,240
 $17,391
 $7,411
 $7,735
 $176,006
 $140,428
 $35,578
 25.3 %
Other expenses (income) 
  
  
  
  
  
          
  
General and administrative 
  
  
  
  
  
     28,750
 26,396
 2,354
 8.9 %
Property acquisition costs 
  
  
  
  
  
     4,757
 4,390
 367
 8.4 %
Depreciation and amortization  
  
  
  
  
     110,421
 87,703
 22,718
 25.9 %
Loss on impairments 
  
  
  
  
  
     29,272
 2,840
 26,432
 930.7 %
Other expenses 
  
  
  
  
  
     1,048
 803
 245
 30.5 %
Total other expenses 
  
  
  
  
  
     174,248
 122,132
 52,116
 42.7 %
Total expenses 
  
  
  
  
  
     216,875
 155,520
 61,355
 39.5 %
Other income (expense) 
  
  
  
  
  
          
  
Interest income 
  
  
  
  
  
     9
 15
 (6) (40.0)%
Interest expense 
  
  
  
  
  
     (36,098) (25,109) (10,989) 43.8 %
Loss on extinguishment of debt  
  
  
  
  
     
 (686) 686
 (100.0)%
Gain on the sales of rental property, net  
  
  
  
  
     4,986
 2,799
 2,187
 78.1 %
Total other income (expense)  
  
  
  
  
     (31,103) (22,981) (8,122) 35.3 %
Net loss 
  
  
  
  
  
     $(29,345) $(4,685) $(24,660) 526.4 %
(1)Includes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale, which are excluded from the same store portfolio. Also includes corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income, which are separated for purposes of calculating NOI.
(2)Excluding corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income, NOI for the total portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $175.4 million and $139.8 million, respectively. Corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income are included in rental income and other income, respectively, in the table above. For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.


Net loss for our total portfolio increased by $24.7 million or 526.4% to net loss of $10.2$29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase is attributable2015, compared to alla net loss of the aforementioned factors.

Comparison of year ended December 31, 2012 to$4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011

        Within the following results of operations, the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consists of STAG Predecessor Group's operations for the period January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011 and our operations for the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2012.Because we did not exist before April 20, 2011, and because, as2014. For a resultdetailed reconciliation of our formation transactions, our company is substantially different from STAG Predecessor Group, we believe this comparison is not meaningful to an analysis of our operations; therefore, a same store analysis is not prepared forportfolio to net loss, see the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

table on the previous page.

Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

Same Store Total Operating Revenue
 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
  
 
 
 2012 2011 Change % Change 

Revenue

             

Rental income

 $73,977 $42,238 $31,739  75.1%

Tenant recoveries

  8,763  5,671  3,092  54.5%

Other income

  1,312  914  398  43.5%
          

Total revenue

  84,052  48,823  35,229  72.2%
          

Expenses

             

Property

  5,983  4,777  1,206  25.2%

General and administrative

  14,549  8,687  5,862  67.5%

Real estate taxes and insurance

  6,858  4,470  2,388  53.4%

Asset management fees

    162  (162) -100.0%

Property acquisition costs

  4,218  1,088  3,130  287.7%

Depreciation and amortization

  42,427  23,670  18,757  79.2%

Loss on impairment

  622    622  100.0%

Other expenses

  339  294  45  15.3%
          

Total expenses

  74,996  43,148  31,848  73.8%
          

Other income (expense)

             

Interest income

  19  29  (10) -34.5%

Interest expense

  (16,110) (15,654) (456) 2.9%

Gain on interest rate swaps

  215  2,941  (2,726) -92.7%

Formation transactions costs

    (3,674) 3,674  -1 

Offering costs

  (68) (78) 10  -12.8%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (929)   (929) 100.0%
          

Total other income (expense)

  (16,873) (16,436) (437) 2.7%
          

Discontinued operations

             

Income attributable to discontinued operations

  1,337  976  361  37.0%

Loss on impairment attributable to discontinued operations

  (3,941)   (3,941) 100.0%

Gain on sale of real estate

  222  329  (107) -32.5%
          

Total income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations

  (2,382) 1,305  (3,687) -282.5%
          

Net loss

  (10,199) (9,456) (743) 7.9%
          

Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends

  (3,720) (3,396) (324) 9.5%
          

Net loss attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc

 $(6,479)$(6,060)$(419) 6.9%
          
          

    Revenue

        Total

Same store operating revenue consists primarily of (i) rental income consisting of base rent, termination income, straight-line rent and above and below market lease amortization from our properties, lease termination fees,and (ii) tenant reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses and asset management fees.

        Total revenue(“tenant recoveries”).


For a detailed reconciliation of our same store portfolio to net loss, see the table on the previous page.

Same store rental income increased by $35.2$0.8 million or 72.2%,0.7% to $84.1$123.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015, compared to $48.8$122.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The2014. Approximately $3.0 million of the increase was


Table of Contents

primarily attributable to additional revenue from the properties contributedrental increases due to us as partnew leases, and renewals and expansions of the formation transactionsexisting tenants. These increases were partially offset by an approximately $1.9 million decrease due to a reduction of base rent due to tenants downsizing their spaces and the acquisitions of 85 buildings since the formation transactions. Of the $35.2 million increase in revenue, $31.7 million relates to basevacancies. Same store rental income $3.1also decreased approximately $0.3 million relates to tenant recoveries, and $0.4 million relatesrelated to an increase in other income, including asset management fee income.

    Expenses

        Total expenses increasedamortization of net above market leases.


Same store tenant recoveries decreased by $31.8$0.5 million or 73.8%,2.9% to $75.0$17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015, compared to $43.1$18.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to one building where during the year ended December 31, 2014, the tenant’s lease terms changed and we began paying real estate taxes for the tenant who had previously been paying the expense to the taxing authority directly. The real estate taxes were payable in arrears, and as such the expense and related recovery recorded for the year ended December 31, 2014 include 24 months of real estate taxes, which attributes to approximately $0.6 million of the decrease in recoveries during the year ended December 31, 2015, in which 12 months of real estate tax recoveries are recorded. Approximately $0.3 million of the decrease is attributable to vacancies, where the tenants had previously been reimbursing us for the related expenses. Approximately $0.4 million of the decrease related to a property where the tenant reimbursed us for deferred repair and maintenance that was necessary upon vacating the space at lease expiration for the year ended December 31, 2014, which did not recur during the year ended December 31, 2015. These decreases were partially offset due to increases in occupancies resulting in an increase in recoveries of $0.4 million, as well as a $0.4 million increase in tenant recoveries related to increases of real estate taxes levied by the related taxing authority.

Same Store Operating Expenses

Same store operating expenses consist primarily of property operating expenses and real estate taxes and insurance.

For a detailed reconciliation of our same store portfolio to net loss, see the table on the previous page.

Total same store expenses increased by $0.2 million or 0.8% to $25.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $25.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase is primarily due to an increase of approximately $0.7 million due to increased occupancy and increased utility usage and other repairs and maintenance costs at multiple properties, and $0.6 million due to an increase of real estate taxes levied by the related taxing authority. Same store expenses increased approximately $0.3 million in real estate taxes due to vacancies or to changes in lease terms where we began paying the real estate taxes on behalf of a tenant that previously paid its taxes directly. Same store expenses also increased by approximately $0.1 million for bad debt expense recognized for one of our tenants. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $0.6 million that is primarily attributable to one building where during the year ended December 31, 2014, the tenant’s lease terms changed and we began paying real estate taxes for the tenant who had previously been paying the expense to taxing authority directly. The real estate taxes were payable in arrears, and as such the expense recorded by us for the year ended December 31, 2014 include 24 months of real estate taxes, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, in which 12 months of real estate taxes are recorded. As discussed in "Same Store Total Operating Revenue" above, we received reimbursement from the tenant for the full $0.6 million. Approximately $0.3 million of the decrease in tenant recoverable expenses related to changes in lease terms where tenants began paying expenses directly to third parties; therefore, the expenses and related recoveries are no longer recognized by us. Approximately $0.4 million of the decrease related to a property where we performed deferred repair and maintenance for a tenant that was necessary upon vacating the space at lease expiration for the year ended December 31, 2014, which did not recur during the year ended December 31, 2015. Same store expenses also decreased by $0.2 million due to real estate taxes that were reduced or abated by the taxing authority.

Acquisitionsand DispositionsNet Operating Income

For a detailed reconciliation of our acquisitions and dispositions portfolio to net loss, see the table on the previous page.

Subsequent to January 1, 2014, we acquired 92 buildings consisting of approximately 18.0 million square feet, and sold 10 buildings consisting of approximately 1.2 million square feet. For the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the buildings acquired after January 1, 2014 contributed approximately $51.1 million and $12.7 million to NOI, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the buildings sold after January 1, 2014 contributed approximately $2.1 million and $4.7 million to NOI, respectively. Refer to Note 3 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding buildings acquired or sold.

Other Net Operating Income

Our other assets include our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale. It also includes corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income, which are separated for purposes of calculating NOI for the total portfolio.

For a detailed reconciliation of our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale to net loss, see the table on the previous page.

At December 31, 2015 we owned 20 flex/office buildings consisting of approximately 1.1 million square feet that are not included in our same store or acquisitions and dispositions portfolios. These buildings contributed approximately $6.8 million and $7.1 million to NOI for year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Additionally, we earned $0.2 million, $17,000, $0.4 million, and $0.6 million in corporate sublease rental income and asset management fee income for the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Total Other Expenses

Total other expenses consist of general and administrative expense, property acquisition costs, depreciation and amortization, and loss on impairments and other expenses.

Total other expenses increased $52.1 million or 42.7% for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $174.2 million compared to $122.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily attributablerelated to additional expense from the properties contributed to us as partan increase of the formation transactions and the acquisitions of 85 buildings since the formation transactions. General and administrative expenses increased $5.9$22.7 million due to the inclusion of salary and other compensation costs following the formation transactions and other administrative costs of being a public company. Additionally,in depreciation and amortization increased $18.8 million as a result of the properties acquired in the formation transactions and 85 buildings acquired, since the formation transactionsnet of buildings disposed, which increased the depreciable asset base.

    The increase was also attributable to an increase of $26.4 million in loss on impairments recorded due to the impairment of 14 buildings for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the impairment of one building for the year ended December 31, 2014 (as discussed in Note 3 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Approximately $2.4 million of the increase relates to an increase in general and administrative expenses, primarily related to non-cash compensation expense related to the 2015 equity grants for employees and independent directors, and other costs attributable to an increased number of employees (54 employees at December 31, 2014 compared to 68 employees at December 31, 2015), primarily salaries and payroll taxes, of approximately $6.3 million. This increase is offset by $3.9 million of severance costs that occurred in 2014 that did not occur in 2015 related to two executives (as discussed in Note 7 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Property acquisition costs also increased by approximately $0.4 million due to six more acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, and other expenses increased by approximately $0.2 million due to increased state income taxes due to additional properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2015.


Total Other Income (Expense)


Total other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest expense, and loss on extinguishment of debt.debt, and gain on the sales of rental property. Interest expense includes interest paid and accruedincurred during the period as well as adjustments related to amortization of financing fees and debt issuance costs and amortization of fair market value adjustments associated with the assumption of debt.


Total other expense increased $0.4$8.1 million or 2.7%,35.3% to $16.9$31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015 compared to $16.4$23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014. The increase in other expense was primarily a result ofattributable to an $11.0 million increase in interest expense related to an overall increase in the gain onweighted average interest rate swaps decreased by $2.7 million from $2.9 millionand an increase in total average debt outstanding for the year ended December 31, 20112015 compared to $0.2 million for year ended December 31, 2012 due to the expiration of the related interest rate swap on January 31, 2012. Additionally, the loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 20122014. The increases were a result of the issuance of unsecured notes and unsecured term loans during 2015; refer to Note 4 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details.


Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this report, we disclose and discuss funds from operations (“FFO”) and NOI, which meet the definition of “non-GAAP financial measures” as set forth in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. As a result, we are required to include in this report a statement of why management believes that presentation of these measures provides useful information to investors.

Funds From Operations

FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, and we believe that to understand our performance further, FFO should be compared with our reported net income or net loss in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements included in this report.

We calculate FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). FFO represents GAAP net income (loss), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating buildings, impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, real estate related to write-offdepreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing feescosts and fair market value of debt adjustment) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because it is a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs. FFO may be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.

However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in connectionthe value of our buildings that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our buildings, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. In addition, other REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the pay-offNAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ FFO. FFO should not be used as a measure of the Wells Fargo Master Loanour liquidity, and the terminationis not indicative of the secured credit facility (as defined below) contributedfunds available for our cash needs, including our ability to the increase in total other expenses. pay dividends.

The increase was partially offset by the decrease in formation transaction costsfollowing table sets forth a reconciliation of $3.7 million, which was a one-time expense associated with the initial public offering of the company in 2011.

    Total income (loss)our FFO attributable to discontinued operations

        Totalcommon stockholders and unit holders for the periods presented to net income (loss) attributable, the nearest GAAP equivalent.

  Year ended December 31,
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to FFO (in thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Net income (loss) $35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)
Rental property depreciation and amortization 125,182
 110,241
 87,502
Loss on impairments 16,845
 29,272
 2,840
Gain on the sales of rental property, net (61,823) (4,986) (2,799)
FFO $115,792
 $105,182
 $82,858
Preferred stock dividends (13,897) (10,848) (10,848)
Amount allocated to participating securities (384) (385) (345)
FFO attributable to common stockholders and unit holders $101,511
 $93,949
 $71,665

Net Operating Income

We consider NOI to discontinuedbe an appropriate supplemental performance measure to net income because we believe it helps investors and management understand the core operations reflects theof our buildings. NOI is defined as rental revenue, including reimbursements, less property expenses and real estate taxes and insurance. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance since it excludes expenses which could materially impact our results of operations and gain on saleoperations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate related to the salecompanies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of properties located in Creedmoor, NC, Pittsburgh, PA, Amesbury, MA, Youngstown, OH and Great Bend, KS. The total income attributable to discontinued operations decreased by $3.7 million primarily due to the loss on impairment of $3.9 million that was recognized prior to the sale of Great Bend, KS, which closed on November 30, 2012. The property and intangibles were tested for impairment as of September 30, 2012 utilizing a probability weighted recovery analysis of certain scenarios, and it was determined that the carrying value of the property and intangibles were not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly as of September 30, 2012, the property and intangibles were written down to their estimated fair value based on pricing obtained from third party market participants.

    Total Net Loss

        Net loss increased by $0.4 million, or 6.9%, to $6.5 millionour NOI for the year ended December 31, 2012 comparedperiods presented to $6.1 million fornet income (loss), the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is primarily attributable

nearest GAAP equivalent.

Table of Contents

to the operations of the properties contributed to us as part of the formation transactions and the acquisitions of 85 buildings since the formation transactions resulting in greater depreciation and amortization. The increase is also attributable to the aforementioned factors above.

  Year ended December 31,
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to NOI (in thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Net income (loss) $35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)
Asset management fee income (210) (379) (598)
General and administrative 33,395
 28,750
 26,396
Property acquisition costs 4,567
 4,757
 4,390
Depreciation and amortization 125,444
 110,421
 87,703
Interest income (10) (9) (15)
Interest expense 42,923
 36,098
 25,109
Loss on impairments 16,845
 29,272
 2,840
Loss on extinguishment of debt 3,261
 
 686
Other expenses 1,149
 1,048
 803
Gain on the sales of rental property, net (61,823) (4,986) (2,799)
Corporate sublease rental income 
 (187) (17)
Net operating income  $201,129
 $175,440
 $139,813
Cash Flows

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 20132016 to the year ended December 31, 2012

2015

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands).

2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
  
 
 
 2013 2012 Change % Change 

Cash provided by operating activities

  82,687 $48,011 $34,676  72.2%

Cash used in investing activities

  (325, 231) (417,203) 91,972  22.0%

Cash provided by financing activities

  230,228  371,700  (141,472) (38.1)%
  Year ended December 31, Change
Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) 2016 2015 $ %  
Net cash provided by operating activities $135,423
 $121,707
 $13,716
 11.3 %
Net cash used in investing activities $347,112
 $372,038
 $(24,926) (6.7)%
Net cash provided by financing activities $211,870
 $238,464
 $(26,594) (11.2)%

        Net cash provided by operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $34.7$13.7 million to $82.7$135.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, compared to $48.0$121.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to incremental operating cash flows from property acquisitions completed after December 31, 2015, and operating performance at existing properties. These increases were partially offset by the increase inloss of cash revenue net of expenses due in large part toflows from property dispositions that occurred during the acquisition activity. We had net income of $4.9 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2013 compared to a net loss of $10.2 million for the year ended2016 and December 31, 2012, but after adjusting the net loss2015, fluctuations in working capital due to reconciletiming of payments and rental receipts, and a higher cash interest paid due to net cash provided by operating activities (excluding changesan increase in assets and liabilities) the increase is $34.4 million. This is primarily a result of adding back depreciation and amortization of $70.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $43.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

        Net cash used in investing activities.our total average indebtedness outstanding.


Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $92.0$24.9 million to $325.2$347.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, compared to $417.2$372.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. The change iswas primarily attributablerelated to the acquisitionsale of 3924 buildings with an aggregate purchase price of $331.8 million (net of $11.5 million funded by the issuance of common units) during the year ended December 31, 20132016 for net proceeds of approximately $152.1 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 where we sold six buildings for net proceeds of approximately $22.2 million. This was partially offset by an increase in cash paid for the acquisition of 7047 buildings with an aggregate purchase price of $423.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

        Net2016 of approximately $467.3 million, compared to the acquisition of 49 buildings during the year ended December 31, 2015 of approximately $377.8 million. Additionally, we had a an increase in cash provided by financing activities.paid for additions of land and building improvements of approximately $14.2 million, primarily due to a tenant improvements project and the expansion of a building.

Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $141.5$26.6 million to $230.2$211.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016, compared to $371.7$238.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. The change is attributableprimarily due to the proceedsa decrease in cash inflow from our unsecured notes of $70.0$220.0 million from the saleissuance of the series B preferred stock during the year endedunsecured notes on February 20, 2015 and December 31, 2013 and a decrease of $73.2 million in proceeds from sales of common stock in comparison to prior periods.15, 2015. The change is also the resultattributable to an increase of a net inflowrepayment of $77.0 million from mortgage notes payableof $49.9 million, an increase of $5.7 million in offering costs related to the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock on March 17, 2016 and borrowings undernew at-the-market common stock offering programs on May 13, 2016 and November 8, 2016, the unsecured term loansredemption of the 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) on November 2, 2016 of $69.0 million, and unsecured credit facility (each as defined below) during the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to a net inflow of $182.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. Additionally, the change is also attributable to an increase in dividends and distributions paid of $37.2$11.5 million as a result of the increased number of shares and units outstanding as well as a $0.31$0.029163 increase in the dividend paid per share and unit paid forduring the year ended December 31, 20132016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The remaining2015. These decreases were offset by the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock for proceeds of $75.0 million, an increase is due to a decrease of $2.2net cash inflow of $47.0 million for paymentfrom our unsecured credit facility, and an increase in proceeds from sales of loan fees and costs and a decreasecommon stock of $2.4$207.8 million of offering costs forduring the year ended December 31, 20132016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.

2015.

TableComparison of Contents

    Comparison ofthe year ended December 31, 20122015 to the year ended December 31, 20112014

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012 and2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 (inclusive of STAG Predecessor Group from the period January 1, 2011 to April, 19, 2011 and STAG Industrial, Inc. from the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011) (dollars in thousands).Because we did not exist before April 20, 2011, and because, as a result of our formation transactions, our company is substantially different from STAG Predecessor Group, we believe this comparison is not meaningful to an analysis of our operations:

2014.

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
  
 
 
 2012 2011 Change % Change 

Cash provided by operating activities

 $48,011 $17,025 $30,986  182.0%

Cash used in investing activities

  (417,203) (115,039) (302,164) 262.7%

Cash provided by financing activities

  371,700  112,943  258,757  229.1%
  Year ended December 31, Change
Cash Flows (dollars in thousands) 2015 2014 $ %
Net cash provided by operating activities $121,707
 $96,676
 $25,031
 25.9 %
Net cash used in investing activities $372,038
 $421,713
 $(49,675) (11.8)%
Net cash provided by financing activities $238,464
 $342,225
 $(103,761) (30.3)%

        Net cash provided by operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $31.0$25.0 million to $48.0$121.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015, compared to $17.0$96.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to incremental operating cash flows from property acquisitions completed after December 31, 2014, and operating performance at existing properties. These increases were partially offset by the net changes in current assets and liabilities due in large part to the formation transactions and the acquisitionloss of 70 propertiescash flows from property dispositions that occurred during the yearyears ended December 31, 2012.

        Net2015 and December 31, 2014, fluctuations in working capital due to timing of payments and rental receipts, and a higher cash usedinterest paid due to an increase in investing activities.the our total average indebtedness outstanding and an overall increase in our weighted average interest rate.


Net cash used in investing activities increaseddecreased by $302.2$49.7 million to $417.2$372.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015, compared to $115.0$421.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014.  The change is primarily attributable to additionsthe acquisition of 70 properties49 buildings for a total cash consideration of $377.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

        Net2015 compared to the acquisition of 43 buildings for a total cash provided by financing activities.consideration of $420.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. The decreased cash consideration for the 2015 acquisitions is due to $26.3 million of the acquisition consideration being in the form of assumed mortgages notes, $22.9 million in the form of issuances of common units of limited partnership, and $0.3 million of contingent consideration.

Net cash provided by financing activities increased $258.8decreased $103.8 million to $371.7$238.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015, compared to $112.9$342.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The change2014.  This is primarily attributabledue to thea decrease in net proceedscash inflow from our unsecured credit facility of $125.5 million, a decrease in proceeds of sale of common stock the unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loan (as defined below), and the CMBS Loan (as defined below).

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

        As of December 31, 2013, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements other than those disclosed in the table under "—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations" below.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        On January 22, 2013, we completed an underwritten public offering of 6,284,152 shares of common stock (including 819,672 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' option) at a public offering price of $18.30 per share. We received net proceeds of $110.1 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $115.0 million net of the underwriters discount of $4.9 million. We also incurred direct offering costs of $0.2 million. The underwriters' discount of $4.9$241.8 million, and direct offering costs of $0.2 million are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet includedan increase in this report. We used the proceeds to fully pay down the then outstanding balance on our $200.0 million unsecured corporate revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A ("Bank of America") as administrative agent ("unsecured credit facility").

        On April 16, 2013, we completed an underwritten public offering of 2,800,000 shares (including 300,000 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' option) of 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price to the public of $25.00 per share. We received net proceeds of $67.8 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $70.0 million net of the underwriter discount of $2.2 million. We also incurred direct offering costs of $0.2 million. The


Table of Contents

underwriters' discount of $2.2 million and direct offering costs of $0.2 million are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet included in this report. Dividends on the series B preferred stock are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of March, June, September and December of each year. The series B preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock and on parity with our series A preferred stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company. The series B preferred stock has no stated maturity date and is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. Generally, we are not permitted to redeem the series B preferred stock prior to April 16, 2018, except in limited circumstances relating to our ability to qualify as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary for the series B preferred stock). We used the net proceeds to pay off the outstanding amount due under the unsecured credit facility and to fund acquisitions.

        During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we sold 2,672,692 and 298,000 shares of common stock, respectively, under our "at the market" program ("ATM") that commenced on December 14, 2012. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we received net proceeds of $53.9 million and $5.3 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $54.7 million and $5.4 million, net of the sales agents' fees of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, there was approximately $14.9 million of common stock available to be sold under the ATM.

        As partial consideration for eight buildings acquired on June 19, 2013, we granted 555,758 common units in the operating partnership with a fair value of approximately $11.5 million. The issuance of the common units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We relied on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the common units. The remaining purchase price of approximately $40.1 million was paid in cash.

        Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures directly associated with our buildings, including:

    interest expense and scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness,

    funding of property acquisitions under contract,

    general and administrative expenses, and

    capital expenditures for tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

        In addition, we require funds for future dividends and distributions to be paid to our common and preferred stockholders and common unit holders in our operating partnership. On August 15, 2013 our board of directors voted to increase the frequency$21.3 million as a result of the paymentincreased number of our common stockshares and units outstanding as well as an $0.08 increase in the dividend from quarterly to monthly. On September 24, 2013 our board of directors declared dividends on our common stock for each month of the fourth quarter of $0.10paid per share which equates to $0.30 per share on a quarterly basis. The table below sets forth the dividends and distributions that have been


Table of Contents

declared by our board of directors on our common stock and common units during the year ended December 31, 2013:

Amount Declared During 2013
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid

Month Ended December 31

 September 24, 2013 $0.10 January 15, 2014

Month Ended November 30

 September 24, 2013  0.10 December 16, 2013

Month Ended October 31

 September 24, 2013  0.10 November 15, 2013

Quarter Ended September 30

 August 2, 2013  0.30 October 15, 2013

Quarter Ended June 30

 May 6, 2013  0.30 July 15, 2013

Quarter Ended March 31

 March 1, 2013  0.30 April 15, 2013
       

Total 2013

   $1.20  

        On December 18, 2013, our board of directors approved a 5% increase in our annual common stock dividend from the 2013 annual rate of $1.20 per share2015 compared to $1.26 per share commencing with the payment of the January 2014 common stock dividend to be paid in February 2014.

        We pay quarterly cumulative dividends on the series A preferred stock at a rate of 9.0% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share (equivalent to the fixed annual rate of $2.25 per share). The table below sets forth the dividends that have been declared by our board of directors on the series A preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2013:

Amount Declared During Quarter Ended 2013
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid

December 31

 November 1, 2013 $0.5625 December 31, 2013

September 30

 August 2, 2013  0.5625 September 30, 2013

June 30

 May 6, 2013  0.5625 July 1, 2013

March 31

 March 1, 2013  0.5625 April 1, 2013
       

Total 2013

   $2.25  

        We pay quarterly cumulative dividends on the series B preferred stock at2014. Additionally, repayments of mortgage notes increased by $16.1 million primarily as a rate of 6.625% per annumresult of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share (equivalent toimmediate repayment of the fixed annual ratemortgage notes that were assumed in connection with the acquisition of $1.66 per share). The table below sets forth the dividends that have been declaredBurlington, NJ and Laurens, SC properties. These decreases were offset by an increase of proceeds of $40.0 million from our boardunsecured notes as a result of directorsthe issuance of the $100 million 4.32% Series D 10-year unsecured notes and the $20 million 4.42% Series E 12-year unsecured notes on February 20, 2015 and the series B preferred stock during$100 million 3.98% Series F 7-year unsecured notes on December 15, 2015. Additionally, we had an increase of net cash inflow of $250.0 million from our unsecured term loans for the year ended December 31, 2013:

2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.
Amount Declared During Quarter Ended 2013
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid

December 31

 November 1, 2013 $0.4140625 December 31, 2013

September 30

 August 2, 2013  0.4140625 September 30, 2013

June 30 (prorated for April 16, 2013 to June 30, 2013)

 May 6, 2013  0.3450500 July 1, 2013
       

Total 2013

   $1.1731750  
Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe that our liquidity needs will be satisfied through cash flows generated by operations, disposition proceeds, and financing activities. Rental revenue,Operating cash flow is primarily rental income, expense recoveries from tenants, and other income from operations areand is our principal sourcessource of cashfunds that we use to pay operating expenses, debt service, recurring capital expenditures and the minimum distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification. We look to the capital markets (common equity, preferred equity, and debt) to primarily fund our acquisition activity. We seek to increase cash flows from our buildingsproperties by maintaining quality standards for our buildings that promote high occupancy rates and permit increases in rental rates while reducing tenant turnover and controlling operating expenses. We believe that our revenue, together with proceeds from building sales and debt and equity financings, will continue to provide funds for our short-term and medium-term liquidity needs.


Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures directly associated with our buildings, including interest expense, interest rate swap payments, scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, funding of property acquisitions under contract, general and administrative expenses, and capital expenditures for tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

Our long-term liquidity needs, in addition to recurring short-term liquidity needs as discussed above, consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for acquisitions, non-recurring capital expenditures, and scheduled debt maturities. We intend to satisfy our long-term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations, long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, the


Table of Contents

issuance of equity or debt securities, building other borrowings, property


dispositions, joint venture transactions, or, in connection with acquisitions of certain additional buildings, the issuance of common units in the operating partnership.

    Operating Partnership.

As of December 31, 2016, we had total immediate liquidity of approximately $430.7 million, comprised of $12.2 million of cash and cash equivalents and $418.5 million of immediate availability on our unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans.
In addition, we require funds for future dividends to be paid to our common and preferred stockholders and common unit holders in our Operating Partnership. The table below sets forth the dividends attributable to our common stock that were declared or paid during the year ended December 31, 2016. These distributions on our common stock are voluntary (at the discretion of our board of directors), to the extent in excess of distribution requirements in order to maintain our REIT status for federal income tax purposes, and the excess portion may be reduced or stopped if needed to fund other liquidity requirements or for other reasons.
Month Ended 2016 Declaration Date Record Date Per Share Payment Date
December 31 August 1, 2016 December 30, 2016 $0.115833
 January 17, 2017
November 30 August 1, 2016 November 30, 2016 0.115833
 December 15, 2016
October 31 August 1, 2016 October 31, 2016 0.115833
 November 15, 2016
September 30 May 2, 2016 September 30, 2016 0.115833
 October 17, 2016
August 31 May 2, 2016 August 31, 2016 0.115833
 September 15, 2016
July 31 May 2, 2016 July 29, 2016 0.115833
 August 15, 2016
June 30 February 22, 2016 June 30, 2016 0.115833
 July 15, 2016
May 31 February 22, 2016 May 31, 2016 0.115833
 June 15, 2016
April 30 February 22, 2016 April 29, 2016 0.115833
 May 16, 2016
March 31 October 22, 2015 March 31, 2016 0.115833
 April 15, 2016
February 29 October 22, 2015 February 29, 2016 0.115833
 March 15, 2016
January 31 October 22, 2015 January 29, 2016 0.115833
 February 16, 2016
Total     $1.389996
  
On November 2, 2016, our board of directors declared the common stock dividend for the months ending January 31, 2017, February 28, 2017 and March 31, 2017 at a monthly rate of $0.116667 per share of common stock. On February 15, 2017, our board of directors declared the common stock dividend for the months ending April 30, 2017, May 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 at a monthly rate of $0.116667 per share of common stock.

We paid quarterly cumulative dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, and the Series C Preferred Stock (collectively, the "Preferred Stock Issuances") at a rate equivalent to the fixed annual rate of $2.25, $1.65625, and $1.71875 per share, respectively. The table below sets forth the dividends on the Preferred Stock Issuances during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Quarter Ended 2016 Declaration Date Series A
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Series B
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Series C
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Payment Date
December 31 November 2, 2016
(1) 
$0.19375
(1) 
$0.4140625
 $0.4296875
 December 30, 2016
September 30 August 1, 2016 0.56250
 0.4140625
 0.4296875
 September 30, 2016
June 30 May 2, 2016 0.56250
 0.4140625
 0.4965300
(2) 
June 30, 2016
March 31 February 22, 2016 0.56250
 0.4140625
 
 March 31, 2016
Total   $1.88125
 $1.6562500
 $1.3559050
  
(1)
On September 26, 2016 our board of directors approved the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock. OnNovember 2, 2016, we redeemed all of the Series A Preferred Stock, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the redemption date, without interest.
(2)
Dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock were accrued and cumulative from and including the issuance date of March 17, 2016 to the first payment date on June 30, 2016.

On February 15, 2017, our board of directors declared the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock dividend for the quarter ending March 31, 2017 at a quarterly rate of $0.4140625 per share and $0.4296875 per share, respectively.


Indebtedness Outstanding

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

Loan
 Principal Fixed/Floating Rate(1) Current Maturity

Sun Life(2)

 $3,817 Fixed  6.05%Jun-1-2016

Webster Bank(3)

  5,834 Fixed  4.22%Aug-4-2016

Bank of America unsecured credit facility(4)

  80,500 Variable  LIBOR + 1.45%Sept-10-2016

Union Fidelity(5)

  6,551 Fixed  5.81%Apr-30-2017

Webster Bank(6)

  3,121 Fixed  3.66%May-29-2017

Webster Bank(7)

  3,360 Fixed  3.64%May-31-2017

Bank of America unsecured term loan(8)

  150,000 Variable  LIBOR + 1.40%Sept-10-2017

CIGNA-1 facility(9)

  58,874 Fixed  6.50%Feb-1-2018

CIGNA-2 facility(10)

  59,990 Fixed  5.75%Feb-1-2018

CIGNA-3 facility(11)

  16,879 Fixed  5.88%Oct-1-2019

Wells Fargo unsecured term loan(12)

  100,000 Variable  LIBOR + 2.15%Feb-14-2020

Wells Fargo CMBS Loan(13)

  67,165 Fixed  4.31%Dec-1-2022
         

 $556,091    3.64%(14) 
         
         

2016.
(1)
Loan Principal outstanding as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands)    
Interest 
Rate
(1)
    Current Maturity 
Prepayment Terms (2) 
Unsecured credit facility:        
Unsecured Credit Facility (3)
 $28,000
  
L + 1.15%
 Dec-18-2019 i
Total unsecured credit facility 28,000
  
 
    
         
Unsecured term loans:  
  
 
    
Unsecured Term Loan C 150,000
 L + 1.30%
 Sep-29-2020 i
Unsecured Term Loan B 150,000
  
L + 1.30%
 Mar-21-2021 i
Unsecured Term Loan A 150,000
 L + 1.30%
 Mar-31-2022 i
Total unsecured term loans 450,000
      
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (3,392)      
Total carrying value unsecured term loans 446,608
  
 
    
         
Unsecured notes:  
  
 
    
Series F Unsecured Notes 100,000
 3.98% Jan-05-2023 ii
Series A Unsecured Notes 50,000
  
4.98% Oct-1-2024 ii
Series D Unsecured Notes 100,000
  
4.32% Feb-20-2025 ii
Series B Unsecured Notes 50,000
  
4.98% Jul-1-2026 ii
Series C Unsecured Notes 80,000
  
4.42% Dec-30-2026 ii
Series E Unsecured Notes 20,000
  
4.42% Feb-20-2027 ii
Total unsecured notes 400,000
      
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (2,034)      
Total carrying value unsecured notes 397,966
  
 
    
         
Mortgage notes (secured debt):  
  
    
Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. 5,384
 5.81% Apr-30-2017 iv
Webster Bank, National Association 2,853
 3.66% May-29-2017 iii
Webster Bank, National Association 3,073
 3.64% May-31-2017 iii
Wells Fargo, National Association 4,043
 5.90% Aug-1-2017 v
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -1 Facility 35,320
 6.50% Feb-1-2018 vi
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -2 Facility 36,892
  
5.75% Feb-1-2018 vi
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -3 Facility 16,141
  
5.88% Feb-1-2018 vi
Wells Fargo, National Association CMBS Loan 56,608
  
4.31% Dec-1-2022 vii
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans 4,012
 4.78% Dec-15-2023 iii
Total mortgage notes 164,326
  
 
    
Total unamortized fair market value premiums 112
  
    
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (873)      
Total carrying value mortgage notes 163,565
  
 
    
Total / weighted average interest rate (4)
 $1,036,139
  
3.75%    
(1)Current interest rate as of December 31, 2016.  At December 31, 2016 , the one-month LIBOR (“L”) was 0.77167%.  The current interest rate is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees incurred in obtaining debt or the unamortized fair market value premiums.
(2)Prepayment terms consist of (i) pre-payable with no penalty; (ii) pre-payable with penalty; (iii) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date; (iv) pre-payable without penalty two months prior to the maturity date; (v) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date; however, can be defeased; (vi) pre-payable without penalty six months prior to the maturity date; and (vii) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date; however, can be defeased beginning January 1, 2016. 
(3)The capacity of the unsecured credit facility is currently $450.0 million.
(4)The weighted average interest rate was calculated using the fixed interest rate swapped on the current notional amount of $450.0 million of debt, and is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums.

The aggregate undrawn nominal commitments on the unsecured credit facility as of December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2013, the one-month LIBOR rate2016 was 0.1677%.

(2)
This loan with Sun Life Assurance Companyapproximately $418.5 million, including issued letters of Canada (U.S.) ("Sun Life") was assumed on October 14, 2011credit. Our actual borrowing capacity at any given point in connection with the acquisition of the building located in Gahanna, OH. The propertytime may be less and is collateral for this loan. Principal outstanding under this loan includes an unamortized fair market value premium of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2013, which is not included in the calculation of the weighted average interest rate.

(3)
This loan with Webster Bank, National Association ("Webster Bank") was entered into on August 4, 2011 in connection with the acquisition of the building located in Norton, MA. The property is collateral for this loan.

(4)
The spread over LIBOR for the Bank of America unsecured credit facility isrestricted to a maximum amount based on the our consolidated leverage. The spread was 1.45% as of December 31, 2013. The borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2013 was $119.3 million, assuming current leverage levels.

(5)
This loan with Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. ("Union Fidelity") was assumed on July 28, 2011 in connection with the acquisition of the St. Louis, MO building. The property is collateral for this loan. The principal outstanding includes an unamortized fair market value premium of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2013, which is not included in the calculation of the weighted average interest rate.

(6)
This loan with Webster Bank was entered into on May 29, 2012 in connection with the acquisition of the building located in Portland, ME. The property is collateral for this loan.

(7)
This loan with Webster Bank was entered into on May 31, 2012 in connection with the acquisition of a building located in East Windsor, CT. The property is collateral for this loan.
debt covenant compliance.

Table of Contents

(8)
The Bank of America unsecured term loan ("Bank of America unsecured term loan") was entered into on September 10, 2012 and subsequently amended on October 7, 2013. The spread over LIBOR is based on our consolidated leverage ratio. The spread was 1.40% as of December 31, 2013. We swapped LIBOR for a fixed rate for $100.0 million of the $150.0 million capacity on the Bank of America unsecured term loan. The swaps were effective beginning on October 10, 2012. For further details refer to "Interest Rate Risk below."

(9)
The Connecticut General Life Insurance Company ("CIGNA"(“CIGNA”) credit1 facility, was originally entered into in July 2010 (the "CIGNA-1 facility")CIGNA 2 facility and has various buildings servingCIGNA 3 facility contain provisions that cross default the loans and cross collateralize the 17 properties held as collateral under each loan. In addition, each of the CIGNA 1 facility, CIGNA 2 facility and has no remaining borrowing capacity.

(10)
The CIGNA credit3 facility was originally entered into in October 2010 (the "CIGNA-2 facility") has various buildings servingrequire a 62.5% loan to value (including all acquisition costs) and a debt service coverage ratio of 1.5x, each measured at acquisition, but not as collateral. As of December 31, 2013, we have approximately $2.9 million of borrowing capacity under the CIGNA-2 facility, subject to customary terms and conditions, including underwriting.continuing covenants.


(11)
The CIGNA credit facility was originally entered into in July 2011 (the "CIGNA-3 facility") and has various buildings serving as collateral. As of December 31, 2013, we have approximately $47.9 million of borrowing capacity under the CIGNA-3 facility, subject to customary terms and conditions, including underwriting.

(12)
The Wells Fargo, Bank, National Association ("CMBS loan agreement is a commercial mortgage backed security that provides for a secured loan. There are 24 properties that are collateral for the CMBS loan. Wells Fargo") unsecured termFargo, National Association had the right to securitize any portion or the entire CMBS loan was entered intoin a single asset securitization or a pooled loan securitization, which it completed on February 14, 2013, with a borrowing capacity of up to $150 million (the "Wells Fargo unsecured term loan"). BorrowingsDecember 19, 2012. The Operating Partnership guarantees the obligations under the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan bear interest at a floating rate equal to the one-month LIBOR plus a spread based onCMBS loan.
The chart below details our consolidated leverage ratio. The spread was 2.15% and the borrowing capacity was $50.0 milliondebt capital structure as of December 31, 2013, assuming current leverage levels. We swapped LIBOR for a fixed rate for $125.0 million of the $150.0 million capacity on the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan. The interest rate swaps for $25.0 million of the $125.0 million swapped became effective subsequent to December 31, 2013 on February 3, 2014. For further details refer to "Interest Rate Risk" below.2016.
Debt Capital Structure December 31, 2016
Total principal outstanding (in thousands) $1,042,326
Weighted average duration (years) 5.6
% Secured debt 15.8%
% Debt maturing next 12 months 1.5%
Net Debt to Real Estate Cost Basis (1)
 41.0%
(1)
We define Net Debt as our amounts outstanding under our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes, less cash and cash equivalents. We define Real Estate Cost Basis as the book value of rental property and deferred leasing intangibles, exclusive of the related accumulated depreciation and amortization.


(13)
This loan with Wells Fargo was entered into on November 8, 2012 ("CMBS loan") and is a non-recourse loan with 28 buildings serving as collateral.

(14)
The weighted average interest rate was calculated using the swapped rate for the $200.0 million of the $250.0 million outstanding on the Bank of America unsecured term loan and the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan (collectively, the "unsecured term loans").

We regularly pursue new financing opportunities to ensure an appropriate balance sheet position. As a result of these dedicated efforts, we are confident in our ability to meet future debt maturities and building acquisition funding needs. We believe that our current balance sheet is in an adequate position at the date of this filing, despite possible volatility in the credit markets.


Our interest rate exposure as it relates to interest expense payments on our floating rate debt is managed through our use of interest rate swaps, which fix the rate of our long term floating rate debt. For a detailed discussion on our use of interest rate swaps, see “Interest Rate Risk” below.

Unsecured Credit Facility, Unsecured Term Loans and Unsecured Notes
The CIGNA-1unsecured credit facility CIGNA-2provides for a facility fee payable by us to the lenders at a rate per annum of 0.2% to 0.35%, depending on our leverage levels, of the aggregate commitments (currently $450.0 million).  The facility fee is due and CIGNA-3payable quarterly.
Covenants: Our ability to borrow, maintain borrowings and avoid default under the unsecured credit facility, contain provisions that cross-default the unsecured term loans, and cross-collateralize the 21 properties held as collateral under each loan. In addition, eachunsecured notes is subject to our ongoing compliance with a number of the CIGNA-1 facility, CIGNA-2 facility and CIGNA-3 facility require financial covenants, including:
a 62.5% loan to value (including all acquisition costs) and maximum consolidated leverage ratio of not greater than 0.60:1.00;
a maximum secured leverage ratio of not greater than 0.40:1.00;
a maximum unencumbered leverage ratio of not greater than 0.60:1.00;
a maximum secured recourse debt servicelevel of not greater than 0.075:1.00;
a minimum fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.50:1.00;
a minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio of 1.5x, each measured at acquisition, but not less than 1.75:1.00; and
a minimum tangible net worth covenant test.
The respective note purchase agreements additionally contain a financial covenant that requires us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 1.50:1.00. 
Pursuant to the terms of our unsecured debt agreements, we may not pay distributions that exceed the minimum amount required for us to qualify and maintain our status as continuing covenants.

        The CMBS loan agreementa REIT if a default or event of default occurs and is a commercial mortgage-backed security that provides for a secured loan. Therecontinuing.

Our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes are 28 properties located in eight states that are collateral for the CMBS loan. Wells Fargo had the right to securitize any portion or the entire CMBS loan in a single asset securitization or a pooled loan securitization, which it completed on December 19, 2012. The operating partnership guarantees the obligations under the CMBS loan.


Table of Contents

        Our debt is subject to certainongoing compliance with a number of financial and other covenants. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in the credit agreement and loan agreements.

    Unsecured Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loans

        Unsecured Credit Facility and Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan:    On September 10, 2012, we closed a credit agreement ("credit agreement") for an unsecured corporate revolving credit facility with Bank of America as administrative agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated as lead arranger ("unsecured credit facility"). The unsecured credit facility provides for a senior unsecured revolving credit facility of up to $200.0 million, with a sublimit of $10.0 million for swing line loans and $10.0 million for letters of credit. Additionally, the unsecured credit facility has an accordion feature that allows us to request an increase in its borrowing capacity to $300.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The unsecured credit facility will mature on September 10, 2016, subject to a one-year extension option which we may exercise at our election, pursuant to certain terms and conditions, including the payment of an extension fee, contained in the credit agreement. Proceeds from the unsecured credit facility have been and will be used for building acquisitions, working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. We currently do not intend to use this facility to repay our existing debt obligations upon maturity. The credit agreement also provides for the $150.0 million, five-year Bank of America unsecured term loan with a maturity date of September 10, 2017.

        The amount available for us to borrow under the unsecured credit facility is based on (a) the lesser of (i) 60.0% of the Borrowing Base Values (as defined in the credit agreement) of our buildings that form the borrowing base for the facility, and (ii) the amount that would create a debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.6 based on a 30-year amortization period, less (b) any other unsecured indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) then outstanding.

        Amounts outstanding under the unsecured credit facility and the Bank of America unsecured term loan bear interest at a floating rate equal to, at our election, the one-month Eurodollar Rate or the Base Rate (each as defined in the credit agreement) plus a spread, that depends upon our consolidated leverage ratio. At December 31, 2013, the spread over LIBOR on the unsecured credit facility was 1.45% and the spread over LIBOR on the Bank of America unsecured term loan was 1.40%. The floating rate interest on $100.0 million of the $150.0 million unsecured term loan was fixed utilizing seven interest rate swaps with rates ranging from 0.727% to 0.7975%. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (See "Interest Rate Risk" below for further details).

        On October 7, 2013, the unsecured credit facility and the Bank of America unsecured term loan were amended to reduce the spreads on the one-month Eurodollar Rate and the Base Rate and to reduce the unused fee rates. The amendment was considered a modification of terms; therefore, no deferred financing fees were expensed as a loss on extinguishment of debt. The following table


Table of Contents

compares the original terms to the amended terms of the unsecured credit facility and the Bank of America unsecured term loan.


Original TermsAmended Terms
Applicable Rates
Unsecured Credit Facility
and Unsecured Term Loan
Unsecured
Credit Facility
Unsecured
Term Loan

Eurodollar Rate(1):

one month-LIBOR + 165.0 bps - 225.0 bpsone month-LIBOR + 145.0 bps - 205.0 bpsone month-LIBOR + 140.0 bps - 200.0 bps

Base Rate(1):

Base rate + 65.0 bps - 125.0 bpsBase rate + 45.0 bps - 105.0 bpsBase rate + 40.0 bps - 100.0 bps

Unused Fees:

<50%, 35.0 bps; > 50%, 25.0 bps<50%, 25.0 bps; > 50%, 20.0 bps

(1)
The spread over the applicable rate is based on our consolidated leverage ratio.

        Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan:    On February 14, 2013, we entered into a seven-year term loan agreement ("loan agreement") with Wells Fargo Bank and certain other lenders. The loan agreement provides for the Wells Fargo unsecured loan in the original principal amount of up to $150.0 million. Additionally, the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan has a feature that allows us to request an increase in total commitments of up to $250.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement, the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan will mature on February 14, 2020.

        The amount available for us to borrow under the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan is based on (a) the lesser of (i) 60% of the Borrowing Base Values (as defined in the loan agreement) of our buildings that form the borrowing base of the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan, and (ii) the amount that would create a debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.6 based on a 30-year amortization period, less (b) any other unsecured indebtedness (as defined in the loan agreement) then outstanding.

        Borrowings under the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan bear interest at a floating rate equal to, at our election, the Eurodollar Rate or the Base Rate (each as defined in the loan agreement) plus a spread. The spread depends upon our consolidated leverage ratio and ranges from 2.15% to 2.70% for Eurodollar Rate based borrowings and from 1.15% to 1.70% for Base Rate based borrowings.

        As of December 31, 2013, the spread over LIBOR on the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan was 2.15% and the floating rate interest on the entire outstanding principal balance was fixed utilizing three interest rate swaps with rates from 1.33% to 1.703%. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (See "Interest Rate Risk" below for further details). We also pay customary fees and expense reimbursements, including an unused fee equal to 0.35% of the unused portion of the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan, which is paid monthly in arrears. The Wells Fargo unsecured term loan has the following prepayment fees:

If prepayment occurs:
Prepayment Fee:

On or before the first anniversary of the closing date

3% of the principal amount of loan prepaid.

After the first anniversary of the closing date but on or before the second anniversary of the closing date

2% of the principal amount of loan prepaid.

After the second anniversary of the closing date but on or before the third anniversary of the closing date

1% of the principal amount of loan prepaid.

Thereafter

0

Table of Contents

        Financial Covenants:    Our ability to borrow under the unsecured credit facility and the unsecured term loans is subject to our ongoing compliance with a number of customary financial covenants, including:

    a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of not greater than 0.60:1.00;

    a maximum secured leverage ratio of not greater than 0.45:1.00;

    a maximum unencumbered leverage ratio of not greater than 0.60:100;

    a maximum secured recourse debt ratio of not greater than 7.5%;

    a minimum fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.50 to 1.00;

    a minimum tangible net worth covenant test; and

    various thresholds on company level investments.

        The unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans contain financial and operating covenants and restrictions. We were in compliance with all such restrictions and financial covenants as of December 31, 2013. In the event of a default related to the financing and operating covenants, our dividend distributions are limited to the minimum amount necessary for us to maintain our status as a REIT.

Events of Default:  TheOur unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans contain customary events of default, including but not limited to non-payment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, defaults in the compliance with the covenants contained in the documents evidencing the unsecured credit facility and the unsecured term loans, cross- defaultscross-defaults to other material debt and bankruptcy or other insolvency events.


Borrower and Guarantors:    The companyOperating Partnership is the borrower under the unsecured credit facility, the unsecured term loans and is the issuer of the unsecured notes.  STAG Industrial, Inc. and certain of ourits subsidiaries guarantee the obligations under theour unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans.

    debt agreements.

Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013,2016, specifically our obligations under long-termlong‑term debt agreements and ground lease agreements (dollars in thousands):

 
 Payments by Period 
Contractual Obligations(1)(2)
 Total 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 - 2018 Thereafter 

Principal payments(3)

 $555,803 $4,447 $98,465 $278,883 $174,008 

Interest payments—fixed rate debt(4)(5)

  94,116  18,509  36,186  24,691  14,730 

Operating leases and ground leases(4)

  15,177  1,134  2,634  2,163  9,246 

Other(4)(6)

  525  150  300  75   
            

Total

 $665,621 $24,240 $137,585 $305,812 $197,984 
            
            

agreements.
(1)
From time-to-time
  Payments by Period
Contractual Obligations (in thousands)(1)(2)
 Total 2017 2018-2019 2020-2021 Thereafter
Principal payments(3)
 $1,042,326
 $18,737
 $118,504
 $304,109
 $600,976
Interest payments—Fixed rate debt (4)
 166,940
 25,984
 40,858
 40,080
 60,018
Interest payments —Variable rate debt (4)(5)
 62,739
 13,098
 28,193
 20,075
 1,373
Property lease (4)
 4,945
 1,064
 2,368
 1,513
 
Ground leases (4)
 8,203
 363
 748
 756
 6,336
Other(4)(6)
 75
 75
 
 
 
Total $1,285,228
 $59,321
 $190,671
 $366,533
 $668,703
(1)From time to time in the normal course of our business, we enter into various contracts with third parties that may obligate us to make payments, such as maintenance agreements at our buildings. Such contracts, in the aggregate, do not represent material obligations, are typically short-term and cancellable within 90 days and are not included in the table above.
(2)The terms of the loan agreements for each of the CIGNA facilities also stipulate that general reserve escrows be funded monthly in an amount equal to eight basis points of the principal of the loans outstanding at the time. Additionally, the Wells Fargo, National Association CMBS loan calls for a monthly leasing escrow payment of approximately $0.1 million and the balance of the reserve is capped at $2.1 million. The cap was met at December 31, 2016 and the balance at December 31, 2016 was approximately $2.2 million. The funding of these reserves is not included in the table above.
(3)The total payments do not include unamortized deferred financing fees, debt issuance costs, or fair market value premiums associated with certain loans.
(4)This is not included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets included in this report.
(5)Amounts include interest rate payments on the $450.0 million current notional amount of our interest rate swaps, as discussed below.
(6)Amounts relate to a credit monitoring fee paid to the affiliates of Columbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, Inc.

Equity

Preferred Stock

On March 17, 2016, we completed an underwritten public offering of 3,000,000 shares of the 6.875% Series C Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price to the public of $25.00 per share. OnNovember 2, 2016, we redeemed all of the Series A Preferred Stock. The table below sets forth our outstanding preferred stock issuances as of December 31, 2016.
Preferred Stock Issuances Issuance Date Number of Shares Price and Liquidation Value Per Share Interest Rate
Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 
 April 16, 2013 2,800,000
 $25.00
 6.625%
Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 
 March 17, 2016 3,000,000
 $25.00
 6.875%

The Preferred Stock Issuances rank on parity with each other and rank senior to our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The Preferred Stock Issuances have no stated maturity date and are not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. Generally, we are not permitted to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock prior to April 16, 2018 and March 17, 2021, respectively, except in limited circumstances relating to our ability to qualify as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of control.

Common Stock

The following sets forth our ATM common stock offering program as of December 31, 2016. We may from time to time sell common stock through sales agents under the program.
ATM Stock Offering Program (in thousands) Date Maximum Aggregate Offering Price
(in thousands)
 Aggregate Common Stock Available as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands)
2016 $228 million ATM November 8, 2016 $228,218
 $117,331

The table below sets forth the activity for the ATM common stock offering programs during the three months and year ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands, except share data).
  Three months ended December 31, 2016
ATM Stock Offering Program Shares
Sold
 Weighted Average Price Per Share Gross
Proceeds
 Sales
Agents’ Fee
 Net
Proceeds
2016 $228 million ATM 4,763,838
 $23.28
 $110,887
 $1,550
 $109,337
2016 $200 million ATM(1)
 3,124,700
 $22.74
 71,069
 918
 70,151
Total/weighted average 7,888,538
 $23.07
 $181,956
 $2,468
 $179,488
(1)This program ended before December 31, 2016.
  Year ended December 31, 2016
ATM Stock Offering Program Shares
Sold
 Weighted Average Price Per Share Gross
Proceeds
 Sales
Agents’ Fee
 Net
Proceeds
2016 $228 million ATM 4,763,838
 $23.28
 $110,887
 $1,550
 $109,337
2016 $200 million ATM(1)
 7,326,200
 $23.45
 171,782
 2,429
 169,353
Total/weighted average 12,090,038
 $23.38
 $282,669
 $3,979
 $278,690
(1)This program ended before December 31, 2016.

Noncontrolling Interest

We own our interests in all of our properties and conduct substantially all of our business through our Operating Partnership. We are the sole member of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2016, we enter into various contracts withowned approximately 95.7% of the common units of our Operating Partnership, and our current and former executive officers, directors, senior employees and their affiliates, and third parties that may obligatewho contributed properties to us to make payments, such as maintenance agreements atin exchange for common units in our buildings. Such contracts,Operating Partnership, owned the remaining 4.3%.

Non-cash Compensation Expense

We recorded approximately $7.8 million in general and administrative expenses in the aggregate, do not represent material obligations, are typically short-termaccompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the amortization of our equity incentive plan, excluding severance costs and cancellable within 90 days and are not included inboard of directors' compensation. The following table summarizes the table above.

(2)
The termsexpected amortization of our unrecognized compensation expense over the loan agreements for eachnext five years related to all existing equity awards as of the CIGNA-1 facility, CIGNA-2 facility and CIGNA-3 facility also stipulate that general reserve escrows be funded monthly in an amount equal to eight basis points of the principal of the loans outstanding at the time. Additionally, the CMBS Loan calls for a monthly leasing escrow payment of approximately $0.1 million and the
December 31, 2016.
Year Future Amortization of Non-cash Compensation Expense (in thousands)
2017 $6,902
2018 $3,215
2019 $1,646
2020 $340
2021 $113

Table of Contents

    balance of the reserve is capped at $2.1 million. The funding of these reserves is not included in the table above.

(3)
The total payments do not include approximately $0.3 million of unamortized fair market value premium associated with two loans assumed (the Sun Life loan and the Union Fidelity loan).

(4)
Not included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets included in this report.

(5)
Amounts include interest rate payments on the $225.0 million of the $250.0 million unsecured term loans that have been swapped to a fixed rate.

(6)
Amounts relate to a fee paid to the affiliates of Columbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, Inc. ("Columbus Nova"). We entered into on agreement with Columbus Nova to source sale leaseback transactions for potential acquisition.

Interest Rate Risk

        ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, requires us


We use interest rate swaps to fix the rate of our variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2016, all of our outstanding variable rate debt, with the exception of our unsecured credit facility, was fixed with interest rate swaps.

We recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value and the changes in fair value must be reflected as income or expense. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive loss,income (loss), which is a component of equity. The ineffective portion of a derivative'sderivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

        On September 14, 2012, we commenced Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value and the changes in fair value must be reflected as income or expense.


We have established criteria for suitable counterparties in relation to various specific types of risk. We only use counterparties that have a programcredit rating of utilizing designated derivatives to hedge the variable cash flows associated with a portion of the Bank of America unsecured term loan. We entered into sevenno lower than investment grade at swap inception from Moody’s Investor Services, Standard & Poor’s, or Fitch Ratings or other nationally recognized rating agencies.


The following table details our outstanding interest rate swap agreements for notional amounts varying from $10.0 million to $25.0 million with a total notional amount of $100.0 million with an effective date of October 10, 2012. The swaps convert the one-month LIBOR rate on $100.0 million of the $150.0 million Bank of America unsecured term loan due on September 10, 2017, from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread of 1.40% to 2.00% (spreads as of December 31, 2013) based on our consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate ranging from 0.727% and 0.7975% plus a spread of 1.40% to 2.00% (potential spreads as of December 31, 2013) based on our consolidated leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2013,2016.
Interest Rate
Derivative Counterparty
 Trade Date     Effective Date Notional Amount
(in thousands)
 Fair Value
(in thousands)
 Pay Fixed Interest Rate Receive Variable Interest Rate Maturity Date
PNC Bank, N.A. Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Bank of America, N.A. Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
UBS AG Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Royal Bank of Canada Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
RJ Capital Services, Inc. Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $5
 0.7975% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Bank of America, N.A. Sep-20-2012 Oct-10-2012 $25,000
 $21
 0.7525% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
RJ Capital Services, Inc. Sep-24-2012 Oct-10-2012 $25,000
 $26
 0.7270% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Regions Bank Mar-01-2013 Mar-01-2013 $25,000
 $131
 1.3300% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
Capital One, N.A. Jun-13-2013 Jul-01-2013 $50,000
 $(274) 1.6810% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
Capital One, N.A. Jun-13-2013 Aug-01-2013 $25,000
 $(154) 1.7030% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
Regions Bank Sep-30-2013 Feb-03-2014 $25,000
 $(378) 1.9925% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $25,000
 $217
 1.3830% One-month L Sep-29-2020
PNC Bank, N.A. Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $50,000
 $421
 1.3906% One-month L Sep-29-2020
Regions Bank Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $35,000
 $292
 1.3858% One-month L Sep-29-2020
U.S. Bank, N.A. Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $25,000
 $207
 1.3950% One-month L Sep-29-2020
Capital One, N.A. Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $15,000
 $123
 1.3950% One-month L Sep-29-2020
Royal Bank of Canada Jan-08-2015 Mar-20-2015 $25,000
 $(16) 1.7090% One-month L Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Jan-08-2015 Mar-20-2015 $25,000
 $(18) 1.7105% One-month L Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Jan-08-2015 Sep-10-2017 $100,000
 $(1,240) 2.2255% One-month L Mar-21-2021
Wells Fargo, N.A. Jan-08-2015 Mar-20-2015 $25,000
 $4
 1.8280% One-month L Mar-31-2022
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Jan-08-2015 Feb-14-2020 $25,000
 $(50) 2.4535% One-month L Mar-31-2022
Regions Bank Jan-08-2015 Feb-14-2020 $50,000
 $(133) 2.4750% One-month L Mar-31-2022
Capital One, N.A. Jan-08-2015 Feb-14-2020 $50,000
 $(175) 2.5300% One-month L Mar-31-2022

The swaps outlined in the spread on the Bank of America unsecured term loan was 1.40%.

        On March 1, 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for notional amount of $25.0 million with an effective date of March 1, 2013 that converts the one-month LIBOR rate on the then $25.0 million outstanding balance of the $150.0 million Wells Fargo unsecured term loan from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread of 2.15% to 2.70% based on our consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate of 1.33% plus a spread of 2.15% to 2.70% based on our consolidated leverage ratio. This swap was designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk.

        On June 13, 2013, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements for notional amounts of $50.0 million and $25.0 million with effective dates of July 1, 2013 and August 1, 2013 that convert the one-month LIBOR rate on the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread of 2.15% to 2.70% based on our consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate of 1.681% and 1.703%, respectively, plus a spread of 2.15% to 2.70% based on our consolidated leverage ratio. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

        On September 30, 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $25.0 million with an effective date of February 3, 2014 that will fix the one-month LIBOR rate on a future draw on the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan. The swap converts the one-month LIBOR rate from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread of 2.15% to 2.70% based on our consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate of 1.9925% plus a spread of 2.15% to 2.70% based on our consolidated


Table of Contents

leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2013, the spread on the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan was 2.15%.

        The aforementioned 11 swapsabove table were all designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, and all are valued as levelLevel 2 financial instruments. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the fair values of all13 of the 23 of our interest rate swaps were in an asset position of $3.9 million. As of December 31, 2012, theapproximately $1.5 million and 10 interest rate swaps were in a liability position of $0.5 million. The increase in value was dueapproximately $2.5 million, excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to rising interest rates in addition to the four aforementioned swaps that were entered into during the year ended December 31, 2013.

these agreements.


As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had $330.5 million of debt with interest at a variable rate. Of the $330.5$478.0 million of variable rate debt, interest on $200.0 milliondebt. As of the $250.0 million unsecured term loans has been fixed with swaps as discussed above. The remaining $130.5 millionDecember 31, 2016, all of our outstanding variable rate debt, is related to the Bankwith exception of America unsecured term loan and Bank of Americaour unsecured credit facility, which was priced at one-month LIBOR plus 1.40% and one-month LIBOR plus 1.45%, respectively, as of December 31, 2013.fixed with interest rate swaps.  To the extent interest rates continue to increase, interest costs on our variablefloating rate debt alsonot fixed with interest rate swaps will increase, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt and our ability to make distributions to our security holders. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements and other interest rate hedging contracts, including swaps, caps and floors. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts third-partiesthird parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.


Inflation

        The


Our business could be impacted in multiple ways due to inflation. We believe, however, that we are well positioned to be able to manage our business in an inflationary environment. Specifically, our weighted average lease term is approximately 4.2 years and, on average, approximately 10-20% of our leases will roll annually over the next few years. We expect that this lease roll will allows us to capture inflationary increases in rent on a relatively efficient basis. In addition, we have long term liabilities averaging approximately 5.6 years when excluding our unsecured credit facility. Our variable rate debt has been fully swapped to fixed rates through maturity with the exception of the unsecured credit facility. Therefore, as rents rise and increase our operating cash flow, this positive impact will flow more directly to the bottom line without the offset of higher in place debt costs. Lastly, while inflation will likely lead to increases in the operating costs of our portfolio, such as real estate taxes, utility expenses, and other operating expenses, the majority of our leases isare either triple net leases or otherwise provide for tenant reimbursement for costs related to real estate taxes and operatingthese expenses. In addition, most ofTherefore, the leases provide for fixed rent increases. We believe thatincreased costs in an inflationary increases mayenvironment would generally be partially offset by the contractual rent increases and tenant payment of taxes and expenses described above. We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact onpassed through to our historical financial position or results of operations.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

        In this report, we disclose and discuss funds from operations ("FFO") and net operating income ("NOI"), which meet the definition of "non-GAAP financial measure" as set forth in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. As a result we are required to include in this report a statement of why management believes that presentation of these measures provide useful information to investors.

    Funds From Operations

        FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, and we believe that to understand our performance further, FFO should be compared with our reported net income or net loss in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in this report.

        We calculate FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"). FFO represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating buildings, impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and fair market value of debt adjustment) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

        Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from building dispositions, it provides a

tenant. 

Table

As of Contents

performance measure that, when compared year over year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.

        However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our buildings that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary maintain the operating performance of our buildings, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. Other equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs' FFO. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, and is not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends.

        The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our FFO attributable to common stockholders and unit holders for the periods presented to net income (loss), the nearest GAAP equivalent (in thousands):

 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. STAG
Predecessor
Group
 
 
 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 Year ended
December 31,
2012
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31, 2011
 Period from
January 1, 2011 to
April 19, 2011
 

Net Income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)$(229)

Depreciation and amortization

  70,597  43,473  22,794  2,459 

Loss on impairment

    4,563     

Gain on sales of real estate

  (5,305) (222) (329)  
          

FFO

 $70,194 $37,615 $13,238 $2,230 
          

Preferred stock dividends

  (9,495) (6,210) (1,018)  

Amount allocated to unvested restricted stockholders

  (262) (122)    
          
          

FFO attributable to common stockholders and unit holders

 $60,437 $31,283 $12,220 $2,230 
          
          

    Net Operating Income

        We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure to net income because we believe it helps investors and management understand the core operations of our buildings. NOI is defined as rental revenue, including reimbursements, less property expenses and real estate taxes and insurance, which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, interest expense, interest income, gain on interest rate swaps, asset management fee income, property acquisition costs, and other expenses. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance since it excludes expenses which could materially impact our results of operations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our NOI for the periods presented to net loss, the nearest GAAP equivalent (in thousands):

 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. STAG
Predecessor
Group
 
 
 Year
ended
December 31, 2013
 Year
ended
December 31, 2012
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31, 2011
 Period from
January 1, 2011 to
April 19, 2011
 

Net income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)$(229)

Asset management fee income

  (893) (1,196) (877)  

General and administrative

  17,840  14,549  8,365  501 

Property acquisition costs

  3,427  4,218  1,088   

Depreciation and amortization

  70,597  43,473  22,794  2,459 

Interest income

  (13) (19) (28) (1)

Interest expense

  20,319  16,269  12,289  4,136 

Gain on interest rate swaps

    (215) (2,179) (762)

Offering costs

  27  68  78   

Loss on impairment

    4,563     

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    929     

Other expenses

  621  339  294   

Gain on sales of real estate

  (5,305) (222) (329)  
          

Net Operating Income(1)

 $111,522 $72,557 $32,268 $6,104 
          
          

(1)
Includes the results of discontinued operations. For the years ended December 31, 20132016, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements. See the table under “Liquidity and 2012, excluding the results of discontinued operations, NOI was approximately $109.0 million and $70.0 million, respectively.
Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations” above for information regarding certain off-balance sheet arrangements.


Item 7A.  Quantitativeand Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. The primary market risk we are exposed to is interest rate risk.  We have used derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings, primarily through interest rate swaps.


As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had $80.5$478.0 million of outstanding undervariable rate debt, all of which, with the exception of $28.0 million of our unsecured credit facility, and $250.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the unsecured term loans bearing interest at a variable rate. Of the $250.0 million outstanding on the unsecured term loans, $200.00 million is subject towas fixed with interest rate swaps. The remaining $50.0 million is related to the Bank of America unsecured term loan, which was priced at one-month LIBOR plus 1.40% as of December 31, 2013. To the extent we undertake additional variable rate indebtedness, if interest rates increase, then so will the interest costs on our unhedged variable rate debt, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt and our ability to make distributions to our security holders. Further, rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures or significantly increase our future interest expense. From time to time, we enter into interest rate swap agreements and other interest rate hedging contracts, including swaps, caps and floors. While these agreements are intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that the other parties to the agreements will not perform, we could incur significant costs associated with the settlement of the agreements, the agreements will be unenforceable and the underlying transactions will fail to qualify as highly-effective cash flow hedges under guidance included in ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging.GAAP. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts third-partiesthird parties are willing


Table of Contents

to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. If interest rates increased by 100 basispoints and assuming we had an outstanding balance of $80.5$28.0 million on the unsecured credit facility and $50.0 million on the unsecured term loans (the portion of outstanding amounts at December 31, 20132016 not fixed by interest rate swaps) for the full year ended December 31, 2013,2016, our interest expense would have increased by $1.3approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

2016.


As of December 31, 2013,2016, approximately $425.3$564.3 million of our consolidated borrowings bore interest at fixed rates (including $200.0(excluding $450.0 million of swapped interest rates under the unsecured term loan)rates), as shown in the future principal debt payment table below (dollars in thousands):

 
 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total Fair Value 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 

Debt

                         

Fixed rate(1)

 $4,447 $4,688 $13,277 $115,506 $113,377 $174,008 $425,303 $425,079 

Average interest rate on fixed rate debt

  5.26% 5.27% 5.03% 2.53% 6.09% 4.13% 4.27%   

Variable rate

      80,500  50,000      130,500  130,500 
                  

Total debt

 $4,447 $4,688 $93,777 $165,506 $113,377 $174,008 $555,803 $555,579 
                  
                  

(1)
Amounts include variable interest rate payments on the $200.0 million of the $250.0 million unsecured term loans that have been swapped to a fixed rate.

        As of December 31, 2013, we were party to the interest rate swaps shown in the table below (dollars in thousands) with a total fair value asset of $3.9 million.

Interest Rate Derivative
 Trade Date Notional
Amount
 Fixed
Interest Rate
 Variable
Interest Rate
 Maturity Date

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7975%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-20-2012 $25,000(1) 0.7525%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-24-2012 $25,000(1) 0.727%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 March-1-2013 $25,000(2) 1.33%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

Interest rate swap

 June-13-2013 $25,000(2) 1.703%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

Interest rate swap

 June-13-2013 $50,000(2) 1.681%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

Interest rate swap

 Sept-30-2013 $25,000(2) 1.9925%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

(1)
Fixes the interest rate of the Bank of America unsecured term loan

(2)
Fixes the interest rate of the Wells Fargo unsecured term loan
Debt2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total Fair Value
Fixed rate 
$18,737
 $88,578
 $1,926
 $2,006
 $2,103
 $450,976
 $564,326
 $565,190
Average interest rate on fixed rate debt5.03% 6.04% 4.34% 4.34% 4.34% 4.42% 4.69% 
Variable rate(1)

 
 28,000
 150,000
 150,000
 150,000
 478,000
 478,000
Total debt$18,737
 $88,578

$29,926
 $152,006
 $152,103
 $600,976
 $1,042,326
 $1,043,190

        We record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of the swap depends heavily on the current market fixed rate, the corresponding term structures of variable rates and the expectation of changes in future variable rates. As expectations of future variable rates increase, the market value of the interest rate swap increases. As of December 31, 2013, all of our interest rate swaps were effectively hedged; therefore, the changes in the fair value of derivatives was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and will be subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we did not record any hedge ineffectiveness related to the hedged derivatives.

        No assurance can be given that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

(1)Variable interest rate debt includes the $450.0 million variable rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate.

Table of Contents

        Interest risk amounts are our management's estimates and were determined by considering the effect of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

Item 8.  Financial Statementsand Supplementary Data


The required response under this Item is submitted in a separate section of this report. See Index to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements on page F-1.


In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we identified an error in the estimated useful life of a building acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014. As a result of the error, depreciation expense had been overstated and thereby rental property, net and equity were understated. We concluded that the amounts were not material to any of our previously issued consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, we revised these balances in the Consolidated Financial Statements submitted in a separate section of this report as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Other periods that have been revised, including the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and the three months ended March 31, 2016 will appear in future filings and are included below (unaudited, in thousands, except for per share data). Additionally, the tables below reflect our selected quarterly information for the three months ended December 31, 2015, September 30, 2015, June 30, 2015, and March 31, 2015, and the effects of this revision on those periods (unaudited, in thousands, except for per share data). Selected quarterly information for the three months ended December 31, 2016 is also presented (unaudited, in thousands, except for per share data).
Selected Interim Financial Information Three months ended December 31, 2016
Total revenue $66,534
Net income $33,067
Net income attributable to common stockholders $28,608
Net income per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $0.38
Effect of Revision As of and For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Consolidated Balance Sheet, September 30, 2016      
Total equity $933,942
 $4,071
 $938,013
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Three Months Ended September 30, 2016      
Total revenue $62,595
 $
 $62,595
Depreciation and amortization $32,020
 $(531) $31,489
Total expenses $53,138
 $(531) $52,607
Net income (loss) $(401) $531
 $130
Net income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $(185) $505
 $320
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(4,281) $505
 $(3,776)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.06) $0.01
 $(0.05)
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016      
Total revenue $183,709
 $
 $183,709
Depreciation and amortization $93,318
 $(1,593) $91,725
Total expenses $170,564
 $(1,593) $168,971
Net income $928
 $1,593
 $2,521
Net income attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $1,433
 $1,512
 $2,945
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(9,770) $1,512
 $(8,258)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.14) $0.02
 $(0.12)
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Three Months Ended September 30, 2016      
Comprehensive income $2,462
 $531
 $2,993
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016      
Comprehensive loss $(13,100) $1,593
 $(11,507)

Effect of Revision As of and For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Consolidated Balance Sheet, June 30, 2016      
Total equity $860,398
 $3,540
 $863,938
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Three Months Ended June 30, 2016      
Total revenue $60,242
 $
 $60,242
Depreciation and amortization $31,018
 $(531) $30,487
Total expenses $62,660
 $(531) $62,129
Net loss $(10,472) $531
 $(9,941)
Net loss attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $(9,727) $504
 $(9,223)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(13,823) $504
 $(13,319)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.20) $
 $(0.20)
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Six Months Ended June 30, 2016      
Total revenue $121,114
 $
 $121,114
Depreciation and amortization $61,298
 $(1,062) $60,236
Total expenses $117,426
 $(1,062) $116,364
Net income $1,329
 $1,062
 $2,391
Net income attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $1,616
 $1,007
 $2,623
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(5,492) $1,007
 $(4,485)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.08) $0.01
 $(0.07)
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Three Months Ended June 30, 2016      
Comprehensive loss $(15,540) $531
 $(15,009)
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Six Months Ended June 30, 2016      
Comprehensive loss $(15,562) $1,062
 $(14,500)
Effect of Revision As of and For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Consolidated Balance Sheet, March 31, 2016      
Total equity $903,510
 $3,009
 $906,519
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Three Months Ended March 31, 2016      
Total revenue $60,872
 $
 $60,872
Depreciation and amortization $30,280
 $(531) $29,749
Total expenses $54,766
 $(531) $54,235
Net income $11,801
 $531
 $12,332
Net income attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $11,346
 $504
 $11,850
Net income attributable to common stockholders $8,334
 $504
 $8,838
Net income per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $0.12
 $0.01
 $0.13
       
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Three Months Ended March 31, 2016      
Comprehensive income (loss) $(22) $531
 $509
Effect of Revision For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2015 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Total revenue $58,887
 $
 $58,887
Net loss $(20,134) $531
 $(19,603)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(21,827) $505
 $(21,322)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.32) $0.01
 $(0.31)
Effect of Revision For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Total revenue $55,921
 $
 $55,921
Net loss $(4,680) $531
 $(4,149)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(7,128) $505
 $(6,623)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.11) $0.01
 $(0.10)

Effect of Revision For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Total revenue $52,836
 $
 $52,836
Net loss $(5,228) $531
 $(4,697)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(7,638) $505
 $(7,133)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.12) $0.01
 $(0.11)
Effect of Revision For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Total revenue $50,989
 $
 $50,989
Net loss $(1,427) $531
 $(896)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(4,042) $506
 $(3,536)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.06) $
 $(0.06)

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreementswith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we have evaluated, under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2013.2016. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures for the periods covered by this report were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by our companyCompany in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management's


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 1992.Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.2016.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

10‑K.

Changes in Internal Controls

There was no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 20132016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Table of Contents


Item 9B.  Other Information

        As of the quarter ended December 31, 2013, all items required to be disclosed under Form 8-K were reported under Form 8-K.

Additional Material Federal Income Tax Considerations

        The following is a summary of additional material federal income tax considerations with respect to the ownership of our stock. This summary supplements and should be read together with the discussions under "Material Federal Income Tax Considerations" in the prospectus dated May 16, 2012 and filed as part of a registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-181290) and in the prospectus dated May 8, 2013 and filed as part of a registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-188465).

    Recent Legislation

        Pursuant to recently enacted legislation, as of January 1, 2013, (1) the maximum tax rate on "qualified dividend income" received by U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates is 20%, (2) the maximum tax rate on long-term capital gain applicable to U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates is 20%, and (3) the highest marginal individual income tax rate is 39.6%. Pursuant to such legislation, the backup withholding rate remains at 28%. We urge you to consult your tax advisors regarding the impact of this legislation on the purchase, ownership and sale of our stock.

    Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders

        For payments after June 30, 2014, a U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate will be imposed on dividends paid on our stock received by U.S. stockholders who own their stock through foreign accounts or foreign intermediaries if certain disclosure requirements related to U.S. accounts or ownership are not satisfied. In addition, if those disclosure requirements are not satisfied, a U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate will be imposed on proceeds from the sale of our stock received after December 31, 2016 by U.S. stockholders who own their stock through foreign accounts or foreign intermediaries. We will not pay any additional amounts in respect of any amounts withheld.

    Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders

        For payments after June 30, 2014, a U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate will be imposed on dividends paid on our stock received by certain non-U.S. stockholders if they held our stock through foreign entities that fail to meet certain disclosure requirements related to U.S. persons that either have accounts with such entities or own equity interests in such entities. In addition, if those disclosure requirements are not satisfied, a U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate will be imposed on proceeds from the sale of our stock received after December 31, 2016 by certain non-U.S. stockholders. If payment of withholding taxes is required, non-U.S. stockholders that are otherwise eligible for an exemption from, or reduction of, U.S. withholding taxes with respect of such dividends and proceeds will be required to seek a refund from the Internal Revenue Service to obtain the benefit or such exemption or reduction. We will not pay any additional amounts in respect of any amounts withheld.

None.

PART III.

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by Item 10 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 11.  Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 11 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownershipof Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by Item 12 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationshipsand Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by Item 13 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal AccountantFees and Services

The information required by Item 14 will be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


Table of Contents

PART IV.

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

    1.
    Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements


1.Consolidated Financial Statements

The financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements on page F-1 are filed as a part of this report.

2.
Financial Statement Schedules


2.Financial Statement Schedules

The financial statement schedules required by this Item isare filed with this report and is listed in the accompanying Index to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements on page F-1. All other financial statement schedules are not applicable.

3.
Exhibits


3.Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit Number
Number
Description of Document
3.1

Articles of Amendment and Restatement of STAG Industrial, Inc. (including all articles of amendment and articles supplementary)(13) (1)

3.2

3.2


Amended and Restated Bylaws of STAG Industrial, Inc.(4) (2)

4.1

4.1


Form of Common Stock Certificate of STAG Industrial, Inc.(1) (3)

4.2

4.2


Form of Certificate for the 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of STAG Industrial, Inc.(9)


4.3


Form of Certificate for the 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of STAG Industrial, Inc.(14) (4)

4.3

10.1

Form of Certificate for the 6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of STAG Industrial, Inc. (5)
10.1

Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.(5) (6)

10.2

10.2


First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.(8) (7)

10.3

10.3


Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.(15) (8)

10.4

10.4
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. (9)
10.5

2011 Equity Incentive Plan(3)Plan (10)*

10.6

10.5


Amendment to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan(16)Plan, dated as of May 6, 2013 (11)*

10.7

10.6


Second Amendment to the 2011 Outperformance Program(7)Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of February 20, 2015 (12)*

10.8

10.7

2015 Outperformance Program (13)*
10.9

Form of LTIP Unit Agreement(3)Agreement (10)*


Exhibit Number
10.8
Description of Document
10.10
Form of Performance Award Agreement (1)*
10.11

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Benjamin S. Butcher, dated April 20, 2011(5)May 4, 2015 (14)*

10.12

10.9


Executive Employment Agreement with Gregory W. Sullivan,William R. Crooker, dated April 20, 2011(5)February 25, 2016 (11)*

10.13

10.10


Executive Employment Agreement with Stephen C. Mecke, dated April 20, 2011(5)2011 (6)*

10.14

10.11


Executive Employment Agreement with Kathryn Arnone,Jeffrey M. Sullivan, dated April 20, 2011(5)October 27, 2014 (6)*

10.15

10.12


Executive Employment Agreement with David G. King, dated April 20, 2011(5)2011 (6)*

10.16

10.13
Executive Employment Agreement with Peter S. Fearey, dated February 25, 2016 (1)*
10.17

Form of Indemnification Agreement between STAG Industrial, Inc. and its directors and officers(2)officers (17)*

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description of Document
10.1810.14

Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 20, 2011, by and among STAG Industrial, Inc., STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. and the persons named therein(5)therein (6)

10.19

10.15


Voting Agreement Termination Agreement, by and among STAG Industrial, Inc., STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. and the persons named therein(17)


10.16


Master Loan Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2010, by and among STAG GI Investments Holdings, LLC and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company(1)


10.17


Master Loan Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2010, by and among STAG GI Investments Holdings, LLC and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company(6)


10.18


Master Loan Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2011, by and among STAG GI Investments Holdings, LLC and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company(6)


10.19


Services Agreement between STAG Industrial Management, LLC and STAG Manager II, LLC, as amended (18)

10.20

10.20


Services Agreement between STAG Industrial Management, LLC and STAG Manager III, LLC(5)


10.21


Credit Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2012, by andDecember 18, 2014, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, of America, N.A.National Association, and the other lenders party thereto(10)thereto (19)

10.21

10.22


First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2013, by andSeptember 29, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, of America, N.A.National Association, and the other lenders party thereto(18)thereto (20)

10.22

10.23


Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2013, byAmended and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto(19)


10.24


Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2012, among STAG Industrial Holdings, LLC and the sellers identified therein, as amended(10)


10.25


Loan Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2012, by and among Borrowers (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lender(11)


10.26


Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2013,December 20, 2016, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Securities, LLCBank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto(12)thereto (21)

10.23

12.1

Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2016, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto (21)
10.24

Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2015, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto (20)
10.25

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2014, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (22)
10.26

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2014, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the noteholders named therein (19)
10.27

Second Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the noteholders named therein (23)
10.28

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2014, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (19)
10.29

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the noteholders named therein (23)
10.30

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (23)
12.1

Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges and earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

21.1

21.1


Subsidiaries of STAG Industrial, Inc.

23.1

23.1


Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

24.1

24.1


Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

31.1

31.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description of Document
101

The following materials from STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132016 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (vi) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity, (v) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes to these consolidated and combined financial statements.

*Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(1)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 3, 2016.

(2)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on April 8, 2011.
(3)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on September 24, 2010.
(4)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on April 11, 2013.
(5)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016.
(6)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 21, 2011.
(7)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 2, 2011.
(8)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2013.
(9)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2016.
(10)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on April 5, 2011.
(11)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 6, 2013.
(12)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015.
(13)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 15, 2015.
(14)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015.
(15)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2014.
(16)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 31, 2014.
(17)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on February 16, 2011.
(18)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2014.
(19)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 19, 2014.
(20)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 1, 2015.
(21)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 27, 2016.
(22)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 22, 2014.
(23)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2015.

*
Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(1)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on
Item 16. Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 2010.

(2)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2011.

(3)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2011.

(4)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2011.

(5)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2011.

(6)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2011.

(7)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2011.

(8)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2011.

(9)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-177131) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2011.

(10)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2012.

(11)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2012.

(12)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2013.

(13)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2013.

(14)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2013.

(15)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2013.

(16)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2013.
10-K Summary

Table of Contents

(17)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2013.

(18)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013.

(19)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on October 10, 2013.
None.

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.

Dated: February 26, 201416, 2017

 



 

 

 

By:


/s/ BENJAMIN S. BUTCHER

Benjamin S. Butcher
By:
Benjamin S. Butcher
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of STAG Industrial, Inc., hereby severally constitute Benjamin S. Butcher and Gregory W. Sullivan,William R. Crooker, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable STAG Industrial, Inc. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and dates indicated.

Signature
Title
Date


Signature



Title
February 16, 2017/s/ BENJAMIN S. BUTCHER

Benjamin S. Butcher
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (principal
(principal executive officer) and President
Benjamin S. Butcher
 February 26, 2014

February 16, 2017
/s/ VIRGIS W. COLBERT

Virgis W. Colbert


Director


February 26, 2014

Virgis W. Colbert
February 16, 2017/s/ JEFFREY D. FURBER

Jeffrey D. Furber


Director


February 26, 2014

Jeffrey D. Furber
February 16, 2017/s/ LARRY T. GUILLEMETTE

Larry T. Guillemette


Director


February 26, 2014

 Larry T. Guillemette
February 16, 2017/s/ FRANCIS X. JACOBY III

Francis X. Jacoby III


Director


February 26, 2014

Table of Contents

Signature
Title
Date





Francis X. Jacoby III
February 16, 2017/s/ CHRISTOPHER P. MARR

Christopher P. Marr
Director
Christopher P. Marr
 
February 16, 2017/s/ Hans S. WegerDirector
Hans S. Weger
 February 26, 2014

February 16, 2017
/s/ HANS S. WEGER

Hans S. WegerWilliam R. Crooker


Director


February 26, 2014

/s/ GREGORY W. SULLIVAN

Gregory W. Sullivan


Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)


February 26, 2014William R. Crooker

Table of Contents


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 for STAG Industrial, Inc. 

 F-4 

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations for STAG Industrial, Inc. for the Years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2012 and the Period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and STAG Predecessor Group for the Period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011

2014
 F-5 

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2012 and the Period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and STAG Predecessor Group for the Period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011

2014
 F-6 

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity for STAG Industrial, Inc. for the Years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2012 and the Period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and STAG Predecessor Group for the Period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011

2014
 F-7 

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for STAG Industrial, Inc. for the Years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2012 and the Period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and STAG Predecessor Group for the Period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011

2014
 F-8 

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements

 F-9 

Financial Statement Schedule—Schedule II

 F-54 

Financial Statement Schedule—Schedule III


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of STAG Industrial, Inc.

:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of STAG Industrial, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the twothree years in the period ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 20112016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedules, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits (which were integrated audits in 2013 and 2012).audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.


A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 26, 2014

16, 2017

Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of STAG Industrial, Inc.

        In our opinion, the accompanying combined statements of operations, comprehensive loss, owner's deficit and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011 present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of STAG Predecessor Group for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011 listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related combined financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 9, 2012, except for the Combined Statements of Comprehensive Loss and the effects of discontinued operations described in Note 3 to the combined financial statements, as to which the date is February 26, 2014


Table of Contents


Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.  Financial Statements


STAG Industrial, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

 
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 

Assets

       

Rental Property:

       

Land

 $134,399 $104,656 

Buildings

  871,422  654,518 

Tenant improvements

  36,994  34,900 

Building and land improvements

  36,231  22,153 

Less: accumulated depreciation

  (71,653) (46,175)
      

Total rental property, net

  1,007,393  770,052 

Cash and cash equivalents

  6,690  19,006 

Restricted cash

  6,806  5,497 

Tenant accounts receivable, net

  13,790  9,351 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  2,594  1,556 

Interest rate swaps

  3,924   

Deferred financing fees, net

  5,467  4,704 

Leasing commissions, net

  3,542  1,674 

Goodwill

  4,923  4,923 

Due from related parties

  185  806 

Deferred leasing intangibles, net

  214,967  187,555 
      

Total assets

 $1,270,281 $1,005,124 
      
      

Liabilities and Equity

       

Liabilities:

       

Mortgage notes payable

 $225,591 $229,915 

Unsecured credit facility

  80,500  99,300 

Unsecured term loans

  250,000  150,000 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

  18,574  12,111 

Interest rate swaps

    480 

Tenant prepaid rent and security deposits

  8,972  5,686 

Dividends and distributions payable

  5,166  11,301 

Deferred leasing intangibles, net

  6,914  6,871 
      

Total liabilities

  595,717  515,664 
      

Commitments and contingencies

       

Equity:

       

Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized,

       

Series A, 2,760,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

  69,000  69,000 

Series B, 2,800,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013

  70,000   

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 44,764,377 and 35,698,582 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

  447  357 

Additional paid-in capital

  577,039  419,643 

Common stock dividends in excess of earnings

  (116,877) (61,024)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  3,440  (371)
      

Total stockholders' equity

  603,049  427,605 

Noncontrolling interest

  71,515  61,855 
      

Total equity

  674,564  489,460 
      

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,270,281 $1,005,124 
      
      
 December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Assets 
 
Rental Property: 
 
Land$272,162

$228,919
Buildings and improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $187,413 and $147,917, respectively1,550,141

1,334,776
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $237,456 and $200,758, respectively294,533

276,272
Total rental property, net2,116,836

1,839,967
Cash and cash equivalents12,192

12,011
Restricted cash9,613

8,395
Tenant accounts receivable, net25,223

21,478
Prepaid expenses and other assets20,821

18,064
Interest rate swaps1,471

1,867
Total assets$2,186,156

$1,901,782
Liabilities and Equity   
Liabilities:   
Unsecured credit facility$28,000

$56,000
Unsecured term loans, net446,608

296,618
Unsecured notes, net397,966

397,720
Mortgage notes, net163,565

229,910
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities35,389

25,662
Interest rate swaps2,438

3,766
Tenant prepaid rent and security deposits15,195

14,628
Dividends and distributions payable9,728

8,234
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $10,450 and $8,536, respectively20,341

11,387
Total liabilities1,119,230

1,043,925
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)


Equity: 
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 15,000,000 shares authorized, 
 
Series A, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2,760,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015

69,000
Series B, 2,800,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 201570,000

70,000
Series C, 3,000,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 201575,000
 
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 80,352,304 and 68,077,333 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively804
 681
Additional paid-in capital1,293,706

1,017,397
Common stock dividends in excess of earnings(410,978)
(332,271)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,496)
(2,350)
Total stockholders’ equity1,027,036

822,457
Noncontrolling interest39,890

35,400
Total equity1,066,926

857,857
Total liabilities and equity$2,186,156

$1,901,782

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share data)

 
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Predecessor Group
 
 
 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 Year ended
December 31,
2012
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31, 2011
 Period from
January 1, 2011 to
April 19, 2011
 

Revenue

             

Rental income

 $116,344 $73,977 $35,749 $6,489 

Tenant recoveries

  16,349  8,763  4,453  1,218 

Other income

  1,200  1,312  914   
          

Total revenue

  133,893  84,052  41,116  7,707 
          

Expenses

             

Property

  10,634  5,983  3,583  1,194 

General and administrative

  17,840  14,549  8,365  322 

Real estate taxes and insurance

  13,376  6,858  3,597  873 

Asset management fees

        162 

Property acquisition costs

  3,427  4,218  1,088   

Depreciation and amortization

  67,556  42,427  21,325  2,345 

Loss on impairment

    622     

Other expenses

  621  339  294   
          

Total expenses

  113,454  74,996  38,252  4,896 
          

Other income (expense)

             

Interest income

  13  19  28  1 

Interest expense

  (20,319) (16,110) (11,829) (3,825)

Gain on interest rate swaps

    215  2,179  762 

Formation transaction costs

      (3,674)  

Offering costs

  (27) (68) (78)  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    (929)    
          

Total other income (expense)

  (20,333) (16,873) (13,374) (3,062)
          

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 $106 $(7,817)$(10,510)$(251)
          

Discontinued operations

             

Income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations

  (509) 1,337  954  22 

Loss on impairment attributable to discontinued operations

    (3,941)    

Gain on sales of real estate

  5,305  222  329   
          
��

Total income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations

  4,796  (2,382) 1,283  22 
          

Net income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)$(229)
          

Less: loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends

  (620) (3,720) (3,396)   
           

Net income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. 

 $5,522 $(6,479)$(5,831)   
           

Less: preferred stock dividends

  9,495  6,210  1,018    

Less: amount allocated to unvested restricted stockholders

  262  122      
           

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(4,235)$(12,811)$(6,849)   
           

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted

  42,364,125  25,046,664  15,630,910    
           

Loss per share—basic and diluted

             

Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders

 $(0.20)$(0.44)$(0.49)   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders

 $0.10 $(0.07)$0.05    
           

Loss per share—basic and diluted

 $(0.10)$(0.51)$(0.44)   
           
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Revenue    
     
     
Rental income$212,741

$186,463
 $149,470
Tenant recoveries37,107

31,666
 23,607
Other income395

504
 739
Total revenue250,243
 218,633
 173,816
Expenses 

 
  
Property48,904

42,627
 33,388
General and administrative33,395

28,750
 26,396
Property acquisition costs4,567

4,757
 4,390
Depreciation and amortization125,444

110,421
 87,703
Loss on impairments16,845

29,272
 2,840
Other expenses1,149

1,048
 803
Total expenses230,304
 216,875
 155,520
Other income (expense) 

 
  
Interest income10

9
 15
Interest expense(42,923)
(36,098) (25,109)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(3,261)

 (686)
Gain on the sales of rental property, net61,823

4,986
 2,799
Total other income (expense)15,649
 (31,103) (22,981)
Net income (loss)$35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends1,069

(1,962) (992)
Net income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.$34,519
 $(27,383) $(3,693)
Less: preferred stock dividends13,897

10,848
 10,848
Less: amount allocated to participating securities384

385
 345
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$20,238
 $(38,616) $(14,886)
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic70,637,185

66,307,972
 54,086,345
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted70,852,548
 66,307,972
 54,086,345
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted 

 
  
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — basic$0.29

$(0.58) $(0.28)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — diluted$0.29
 $(0.58) $(0.28)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands)


 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Predecessor Group
 Year ended December 31,

 Year ended
December 31, 2013
 Year ended
December 31, 2012
 Period from April 20,
2011 to December 31,
2011
 Period from January 1,
2011 to April 19, 2011
 2016 2015 2014

Net income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)$(229)$35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

              

Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps

 4,405 (480)   
         
Income (loss) on interest rate swaps898
 (1,956) (4,197)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 4,405 (480)   898
 (1,956) (4,197)
         

Comprehensive income (loss)

 9,307 (10,679) (9,227) (229)36,486
 (31,301) (8,882)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends

 620 3,720 3,396  
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends(1,069) 1,962
 992

Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 (594) 109   (44) 95
 268
         

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.

 $9,333 $(6,850)$(5,831)$(229)
         
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.$35,373
 $(29,244) $(7,622)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Table of Contents

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity

(in thousands, except share data)

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Noncontrolling
Interest—Unit
holders in
Operating
Partnership
  
 
 
  
 Common Shares  
 Common Stock
Dividends
in excess of
Earnings
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
  
 
 
 Preferred
Stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Predecessor's
Owner's
Deficit
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
  
 
 
 Shares Amount Total Equity 

Period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011

                               

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $   $ $ $ $(8,336)$ $(8,336)$ $(8,336)

Contributions

            4,420    4,420    4,420 

Distributions

            (9,900)   (9,900)   (9,900)

Net loss

            (229)   (229)   (229)
                      

Balance, April 19, 2011 (STAG Predecessor Group)

 $   $ $ $ $(14,045)$ $(14,045)$ $(14,045)
                      

Period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011

                               

Balance, April 20, 2011

 $  110 $ $2 $ $(14,045)$ $(14,043)$ $(14,043)

Proceeds from sale of common stock

    15,812,500  158  205,405        205,563    205,563 

Offering costs

        (19,537)       (19,537)   (19,537)

Issuance of restricted stock

    80,809  1  (1)            

Issuance of common stock

    8,251                 

Dividends and distributions, net

  (1,018)       (11,536)     (12,554) (5,654) (18,208)

Non-cash compensation

        342        342  351  693 

Issuance of units for acquisition of properties

                  95,670  95,670 

Issuance of Series A preferred stock

  69,000              69,000    69,000 

Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest

        (6,290)       (6,290) 6,290   

Redemption of initial capitalization of STAG Industrial, Inc. 

    (110)   (2)       (2)   (2)

Exchange of owners' equity for units

            14,045    14,045  (14,045)  

Net income (loss)

  1,018        (6,849)     (5,831) (3,396) (9,227)
                      

Balance, December 31, 2011 (STAG Industrial, Inc.)

 $69,000  15,901,560 $159 $179,919 $(18,385)$ $ $230,693 $79,216 $309,909 
                      

Proceeds from sale of common stock

    17,835,500  179  242,768        242,947    242,947 

Offering costs

        (11,136)       (11,136)   (11,136)

Issuance of restricted stock

    87,025  1  (1)            

Issuance of common stock

    12,666                 

Dividends and distributions, net

  (6,210)       (29,950)     (36,160) (7,587) (43,747)

Non-cash compensation

        993        993  948  1,941 

Issuance of units for acquisition fee

                  225  225 

Conversion of operating partnership units to common stock

    1,861,831  18  18,597        18,615  (18,615)  

Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest

        (11,497)       (11,497) 11,497   

Other comprehensive loss

              (371) (371) (109) (480)

Net income (loss)

  6,210        (12,689)     (6,479) (3,720) (10,199)
                      

Balance, December 31, 2012 (STAG Industrial, Inc.)

 $69,000  35,698,582 $357 $419,643 $(61,024)$ $(371)$427,605 $61,855 $489,460 
                      

Proceeds from sales of common stock

    8,956,844  89  169,658        169,747    169,747 

Issuance of Series B preferred stock

  70,000              70,000    70,000 

Offering costs

        (8,713)       (8,713)   (8,713)

Issuance of restricted stock, net

    96,287  1  (1)            

Issuance of common stock

    10,478                 

Dividends and distributions, net

  (9,495)       (51,880)     (61,375) (8,330) (69,705)

Non-cash compensation

        1,360        1,360  1,609  2,969 

Issuance of units for acquisition of properties

                  11,499  11,499 

Conversion of operating partnership units to common stock

    2,186    23        23  (23)  

Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest

        (4,931)       (4,931) 4,931   

Other comprehensive income

              3,811  3,811  594  4,405 

Net income (loss)

  9,495        (3,973)     5,522  (620) 4,902 
                      

Balance, December 31, 2013 (STAG Industrial, Inc.)

 $139,000  44,764,377 $447 $577,039 $(116,877)$ $3,440 $603,049 $71,515 $674,564 
                      
 Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Common Stock Dividends in excess of Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive income (loss) Total Stockholders' Equity Noncontrolling Interest - Unit holders in Operating Partnership Total Equity
  Shares Amount      
Balance, December 31, 2013$139,000
 44,764,377
 $447
 $577,039
 $(116,877) $3,440
 $603,049
 $71,515
 $674,564
Proceeds from sales of common stock
 14,406,376
 144
 316,548
 
 
 316,692
 
 316,692
Offering costs
 
 
 (8,899) 
 
 (8,899) 
 (8,899)
Issuance of restricted stock, net
 101,412
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock
 13,446
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of equity pursuant to outperformance program
 43,657
 1
 (1,491) 
 
 (1,490) 1,015
 (475)
Dividends and distributions, net(10,848) 
 
 
 (71,491) 
 (82,339) (4,361) (86,700)
Non-cash compensation
 
 
 1,924
 
 
 1,924
 5,355
 7,279
Redemption of common units to common stock
 5,105,584
 51
 54,681
 
 
 54,732
 (54,732) 
Redemption of common units for cash
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,701) (1,701)
Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 (11,550) 
 
 (11,550) 11,550
 
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 (3,929) (3,929) (268) (4,197)
Net loss10,848
 
 
 
 (14,541) 
 (3,693) (992) (4,685)
Balance, December 31, 2014$139,000
 64,434,852
 $644
 $928,251
 $(202,909) $(489) $864,497
 $27,381
 $891,878
Proceeds from sales of common stock
 3,456,403
 35
 74,857
 
 
 74,892
 
 74,892
Offering costs
 
 
 (1,229) 
 
 (1,229) 
 (1,229)
Issuance of restricted stock, net
 79,384
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock
 15,870
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and distributions, net(10,848) 
 
 
 (91,131) 
 (101,979) (4,772) (106,751)
Non-cash compensation
 
 
 2,805
 
 
 2,805
 4,774
 7,579
Redemption of common units to common stock
 90,824
 1
 1,002
 
 
 1,003
 (1,003) 
Redemption of common units for cash
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (64) (64)
Issuance of units
 
 
 
 
 
 
 22,853
 22,853
Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 11,712
 
 
 11,712
 (11,712) 
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 (1,861) (1,861) (95) (1,956)
Net loss10,848
 
 
 
 (38,231) 
 (27,383) (1,962) (29,345)
Balance, December 31, 2015$139,000
 68,077,333
 $681
 $1,017,397
 $(332,271) $(2,350) $822,457
 $35,400
 $857,857
Proceeds from sales of common stock
 12,090,038
 121
 282,548
 
 
 282,669
 
 282,669
Issuance of series C preferred stock75,000
 
 
 
 
 
 75,000
 
 75,000
Offering costs
 
 
 (6,928) 
 
 (6,928) 
 (6,928)
Issuance of restricted stock, net
 99,968
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock
 16,473
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends and distributions, net(13,897) 
 
 
 (99,329) 
 (113,226) (5,707) (118,933)
Non-cash compensation
 
 
 3,691
 
 
 3,691
 6,084
 9,775
Redemption of series A preferred stock(69,000) 
 
 
 
 
 (69,000) 
 (69,000)
Redemption of common units to common stock
 68,492
 1
 616
 
 
 617
 (617) 
Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 (3,617) 
 
 (3,617) 3,617
 
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 854
 854
 44
 898
Net income13,897
 
 
 
 20,622
 
 34,519
 1,069
 35,588
Balance, December 31, 2016$145,000
 80,352,304
 $804
 $1,293,706
 $(410,978) $(1,496) $1,027,036
 $39,890
 $1,066,926

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Inc
.

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
 STAG
Predecessor
Group
 
 
 Year ended
December 31, 2013
 Year ended
December 31, 2012
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31, 2011
 Period from
January 1, 2011
to April 19, 2011
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

             

Net income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)$(229)

Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

             

Depreciation and amortization

  70,597  43,473  22,794  2,459 

Loss on impairment

    4,563     

Non-cash portion of interest expense

  1,081  957  737  31 

Intangible amortization in rental income, net

  6,544  4,837  2,776  (2)

Straight-line rent adjustments, net

  (2,941) (2,796) (1,036) (16)

Gain on interest rate swaps

    (215) (2,179) (762)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    929     

Gain on sales of real estate

  (5,305) (222) (329)  

Non-cash compensation expense

  2,970  1,936  693   

Issuance of units for acquisition fee

    225     

Change in assets and liabilities:

             

Tenant accounts receivable, net

  (1,515) (1,497) (695) 88 

Leasing commissions, net

  (2,456) (1,020) (877) (24)

Restricted cash

  (201) (137) (124)  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  (939) (799) (207) (87)

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

  6,043  6,174  1,503  106 

Tenant prepaid rent and security deposits

  3,286  2,208  783  169 

Due from related parties

  621  (406)   (141)

Due to related parties

      54  767 
          

Total adjustments

  77,785  58,210  23,893  2,588 
          

Net cash provided by operating activities

  82,687  48,011  14,666  2,359 
          

Cash flows from investing activities:

             

Additions of land and building improvements

  (261,208) (325,820) (80,191) (39)

Proceeds from sales of rental property, net

  14,181  7,221�� 4,507   

Restricted cash

  (1,108) 1,251  (1,561) (542)

Cash paid for contributed assets, net

      (2,159)  

Cash paid for deal deposits, net

  (150) 550  (130)  

Additions to lease intangibles

  (76,946) (100,405) (34,924)  
          

Net cash used in investing activities

  (325,231) (417,203) (114,458) (581)
          

Cash flows from financing activities:

             

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock at initial public offering

      205,563   

Offering cost related to issuance of common stock

      (17,042)  

Redemption of initial capitalization of STAG Industrial, Inc. shares

      (2)  

Proceeds from sale of Series A Preferred stock

      69,000    

Proceeds from sale of Series B Preferred stock

  70,000       

Offering costs related to issuance of preferred stock

      (2,495)  

Proceeds from notes payable to related parties

        789 

Repayment of notes payable to related parties

      (10,366)  

Proceeds from credit facility

    124,300  34,500   

Repayment of credit facility

    (124,300) (34,500)  

Proceeds from unsecured credit facility

  158,500  215,300     

Repayment of unsecured credit facility

  (177,300) (116,000)    

Proceeds from unsecured term loans

  100,000  150,000     

Proceeds from mortgage notes payable

    78,067  48,339   

Repayment of mortgage notes payable

  (4,219) (144,753) (160,645) (1,180)

Termination of swap contracts

      (894)  

Payment of loan fees and costs

  (1,949) (4,119) (3,397)  

Dividends and distributions

  (75,838) (38,606) (12,048) (2,679)

Proceeds from sales of common stock

  169,747  242,947     

Offering costs

  (8,713) (11,136)    
          

Net cash provided by (unsed in) financing activities

  230,228  371,700  116,013  (3,070)
          

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (12,316) 2,508  16,221  (1,292)

Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period

  19,006  16,498  277  1,567 
          

Cash and cash equivalents—end of period

 $6,690 $19,006 $16,498 $275 
          
          
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:              
Net income (loss)$35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization125,444
 110,421
 87,703
Loss on impairments16,845
 29,272
 2,840
Non-cash portion of interest expense1,632
 1,262
 1,337
Intangible amortization in rental income, net6,213
 8,526
 6,253
Straight-line rent adjustments, net(1,817) (3,134) (3,347)
Dividends on forfeited equity compensation3
 25
 128
Loss on extinguishment of debt3,261
 
 686
Gain on the sales of rental property, net(61,823) (4,986) (2,799)
Non-cash compensation expense9,729
 7,578
 7,314
Change in assets and liabilities:     
Tenant accounts receivable, net(1,435) (1,334) 435
Restricted cash(365) (40) (127)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(4,580) (3,155) (2,588)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities6,161
 3,469
 1,018
Tenant prepaid rent and security deposits567
 3,148
 2,508
Total adjustments99,835
 151,052
 101,361
Net cash provided by operating activities135,423
 121,707
 96,676
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Acquisitions of land and buildings and improvements(377,559) (291,949) (333,983)
Additions of land and building and improvements(30,485) (16,329) (11,891)
Acquisitions of other assets(158) (565) 
Proceeds from sales of rental property, net152,079
 22,163
 12,980
Restricted cash(853) (1,449) 27
Acquisition deposits, net(560) 1,420
 (2,020)
Acquisitions of deferred leasing intangibles(89,576) (85,329) (86,826)
Net cash used in investing activities(347,112) (372,038) (421,713)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from sale of series C preferred stock75,000
 
 
Redemption of series A preferred stock(69,000) 
 
Redemption of common units for cash
 (64) (1,701)
Proceeds from unsecured credit facility513,000
 300,750
 426,500
Repayment of unsecured credit facility(541,000) (375,750) (376,000)
Proceeds from unsecured term loans150,000
 150,000
 200,000
Repayment of unsecured term loans
 
 (300,000)
Proceeds from unsecured notes
 220,000
 180,000
Repayment of mortgage notes(70,444) (20,571) (4,463)
Settlement of forward swap contracts
 
 (358)
Payment of loan fees and costs(715) (3,672) (4,431)
Payment of loan prepayment fees and costs(3,278) 
 
Dividends and distributions(117,441) (105,892) (84,640)
Proceeds from sales of common stock282,669
 74,892
 316,692
Offering costs(6,921) (1,229) (8,899)
Withholding taxes for settlement of outperformance program
 
 (475)
Net cash provided by financing activities211,870
 238,464
 342,225
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents181
 (11,867) 17,188
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period12,011
 23,878
 6,690
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period$12,192

$12,011
 $23,878
Supplemental disclosure:     
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest$39,367
 $32,440
 $22,675
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities     
Issuance of units for acquisitions of land and building and improvements and deferred lease intangibles$
 $22,853
 $
Contingent consideration for acquisition of land and building and improvements$
 $(216) $
Contingent consideration for acquisition of deferred leasing intangibles$
 $(84) $
Contingent consideration liability acquired$
 $300
 $
Additions to building and other capital improvements$(1,175) $(565) $
Transfer of other assets to building and other capital improvements$
 $565
 $
Acquisitions of land and buildings and improvements$(3,572) $(38,339) $(3,743)
Acquisitions of deferred leasing intangibles$(1,008) $(11,199) $(593)
Partial disposal of building due to involuntary conversion of building$779
 $
 $
Investing other receivables due to involuntary conversion of building$(779) $
 $
Change in additions of land, building, and improvements included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities$(1,455) $(182) $(1,716)
Additions to building and other capital improvements from non-cash compensation$(18) $
 $
Assumption of mortgage notes$4,037
 $26,267
 $4,198
Fair market value adjustment to mortgage notes acquired$75
 $418
 $138
Change in loan fees, costs, and offering costs included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities$26
 $24
 $(84)
Dividends and distributions declared but not paid$9,728
 $8,234
 $7,355

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements

1. OrganizationandDescription of Business


STAG Industrial, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) is a fully-integrated, full-servicean industrial real estate operating company focused on the acquisition ownership and managementoperation of single-tenant, industrial properties throughout the United States. The Company was formed as a Maryland corporation on July 21, 2010 and has elected to be taxedtreated and intends to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"(“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"“Code”) commencing with its 2011 tax year..  The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT, commonly called an UPREIT, and owns substantially all of its assets and conducts substantially all of its business through its operating partnership, STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"“Operating Partnership”). The Company intends to continue to qualify as a REIT. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company owned an 86.65%a 95.7% and 85.29%95.1%, respectively, limited partnershipcommon equity interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership.  As used herein, the "Company"“Company” refers to STAG Industrial, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, including the Operating Partnership, except where context otherwise requires.


As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company owned 209314 buildings in 3437 states with approximately 38.160.9 million rentable square feet (square feet unaudited herein and throughout Notes), consisting of 142243 warehouse/distribution buildings, 4754 light manufacturing buildings, and 2016 flex/office buildings.buildings, and one building in redevelopment. The Company also owned one vacant land parcel adjacent to one of the Company's buildings. The Company's propertiesCompany’s buildings were 95.6%approximately 94.7% leased to 191275 tenants as of December 31, 2013.

        The Company's "predecessor" for accounting purposes is STAG Predecessor Group (or "Predecessor"), which is not a legal entity, but a collection of the real estate entities that were owned by STAG Investments III, LLC prior to the Company's initial public offering in April 2011 (the "IPO"). The financial information contained in this report that relates to the time periods on or prior to April 19, 2011 is the Predecessor's financial information; the financial information contained in this report for any time period on or after April 20, 2011 is the Company's financial information.The Company did not have any operating activity before April 20, 2011 and, as a result of the Company's IPO and related Formation Transactions (as defined below), is substantially different from STAG Predecessor Group.

        On April 20, 2011, concurrent with the IPO, the members of limited liability companies affiliated with the Company (collectively, the "Participants") that held direct or indirect interests in their real estate properties elected to take limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership ("Common Units") in exchange for the contribution of their properties to the Company.

        On April 20, 2011, in connection with the IPO, the following formation transactions ("Formation Transactions") were completed:

    The Company issued 13,750,000 shares of its common stock for $13.00 per share.

    The Company acquired certain assets and related debt of STAG Predecessor Group and of the Participants. In exchange for such assets and related debt, STAG Predecessor Group and the Participants were issued a total of 7,590,000 Common Units of the Operating Partnership, with an aggregate value of approximately $98.7 million.

    The Company closed a loan agreement for a secured corporate revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") of up to $100 million with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated as lead arranger.
2016.

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

1. Organization and Description of Business (Continued)

    The net proceeds of the IPO, together with borrowings in the amount of approximately $11.0 million under the Credit Facility, repaid approximately $164.7 million in certain outstanding indebtedness (including $2.5 million of direct costs associated with the obtaining and retiring of indebtedness and the termination of interest rate swaps) and $0.3 million to pay transfer taxes and other fees.

        At the time of the Formation Transactions, there were three vacant properties owned by STAG Investments III, LLC ("Fund III") and not contributed to the Company in the Formation Transactions (the "Option Properties"). Upon approval of the Company's independent directors, the Company had the right to acquire any of the Option Properties individually for a period of up to three months after notification that the property has stabilized, defined as 85% or greater occupancy pursuant to leases at least two years in remaining duration. The right to acquire any of the Option Properties would have expired 5 years from the date of the Formation Transactions. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Fund III sold the Option Properties to independent buyers. As of December 31, 2013, there were no remaining Option Properties owned by Fund III.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Presentation


The Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership and their subsidiaries. The equity interests ofInterests in the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company are referred to as “Noncontrolling Common Units.” These Noncontrolling Common Units are held by other limited partners in the Operating Partnership are reflectedform of common units ("Other Common Units") and long term incentive plan units (“LTIP units”) issued pursuant to the STAG Industrial, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as noncontrolling interest. The combined financial statements of STAG Predecessor Group include the accounts of STAG Predecessor Group and all entities in which STAG Predecessor Group had a controlling interest.amended (the “2011 Plan”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation and combination of entities. The financial statements of the Company are presented on a consolidated basis for all periods presentedpresented.


F-8

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements

In connection with the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company identified an error in the estimated useful life of a building acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014. As a result of the error, depreciation expense had been overstated and comprisethereby rental property, net and equity were understated. The Company concluded that the amounts were not material to any of its previously issued consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Company revised these balances in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 as outlined below. These adjustments do not impact the Company’s cash balances for any of the reporting periods. The effects of this revision to the consolidated historicalfinancial statements are as follows (in thousands, except for per share data).
Effect of Revision As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Consolidated Balance Sheet, December 31, 2015      
Building and improvements, net of accumulated depreciation $1,332,298
 $2,478
 $1,334,776
Total assets(1)
 $1,899,304
 $2,478
 $1,901,782
Total equity $855,379
 $2,478
 $857,857
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Year Ended December 31, 2015      
Depreciation and amortization $112,545
 $(2,124) $110,421
Total expenses $218,999
 $(2,124) $216,875
Net loss $(31,469) $2,124
 $(29,345)
Net loss attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $(29,403) $2,020
 $(27,383)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(40,636) $2,020
 $(38,616)
Loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.61) $0.03
 $(0.58)
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Year Ended December 31, 2015      
Comprehensive loss $(33,425) $2,124
 $(31,301)
(1)The as previously reported balance for total assets has been retrospectively adjusted to include the effect of the change in accounting principle for the adoption of ASU 2015-03, as discussed in "New Accounting Pronouncements" below.
Effect of Revision As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Consolidated Balance Sheet, December 31, 2014      
Total assets(1)
 $1,623,448
 $354
 $1,623,802
Total equity $891,524
 $354
 $891,878
       
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Year Ended December 31, 2014      
Depreciation and amortization $88,057
 $(354) $87,703
Total expenses $155,874
 $(354) $155,520
Net loss $(5,039) $354
 $(4,685)
Net loss attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc. $(4,025) $332
 $(3,693)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(15,218) $332
 $(14,886)
Loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted $(0.28) $
 $(0.28)
       
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Year Ended December 31, 2014      
Comprehensive loss $(9,236) $354
 $(8,882)
(1)The as previously reported balance for total assets has been retrospectively adjusted to include the effect of the change in accounting principle for the adoption of ASU 2015-03, as discussed in "New Accounting Pronouncements" below.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January of 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new standard removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. This standard is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


F-9

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


In January of 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The new standard provides a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired or disposed of is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those periods, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-01, it is expected that the majority of the Company's acquisitions will be accounted for as asset acquisitions, whereas under the current guidance the majority of the Company's acquisitions have been accounted for as business combinations. The most significant difference between the two accounting models that will impact the Company's consolidated financial statements is that in an asset acquisition, property acquisition costs are generally a component of the consideration transferred to acquire a group of assets and are capitalized as a component of the cost of the assets, whereas in a business combination, property acquisition costs are expensed and not included as part of the consideration transferred. The Company plans to adopt this standard effective January 1, 2018.

In November of 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.The new standard requires that the statement of cash flows explain the changes during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-18, the Company will reconcile both cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in the accompanying Statements of Cash Flows, whereas under the current guidance the Company explains the changes during the period for cash and cash equivalents only.

In August of 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides clarified guidance on the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt this standard effective July 1, 2016, and the effects of this standard were applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. The effect of the change in accounting principle was an increase in net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and a corresponding increase in net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 related to the payment of loan prepayment fees and costs.

In March of 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718), which addresses certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, forfeitures, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt this standard effective January 1, 2016. As a result, the Company's policy is to recognize forfeitures in the period which they occur, whereas the former guidance required the Company to estimate expected forfeitures. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In February of 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). Topic 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, Topic 840, Leases. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 is expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company has certain operating and land lease arrangements for which it is the lessee, which will result in the recording of a right of use asset and the related lease liability. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations, and expects to adopt the standard effective January 1, 2019.


F-10

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


In January of 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). The amendments in ASU 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The standard primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for the annual periods beginning after December 31, 2017 and for annual periods and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all financial statements of fiscal years and interim periods that have not yet been issued. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April of 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability. In August of 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (Subtopic 835-30), which clarified that debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements may be presented as an asset and amortized over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2016. As a result, debt issuance costs related to the debt liabilities that are not line-of-credit arrangements are included as a direct deduction from the related debt liability and those related to line-of-credit arrangements continue to be included as an asset within prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effects of this standard were applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. The effect of the change in accounting principle was the reduction of unsecured term loans by approximately $3.4 million, unsecured notes by approximately $2.3 million, and mortgage notes by approximately $1.3 million and a corresponding reduction of prepaid expenses and other assets by approximately $6.9 million as of December 31, 2015.

In February of 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to Consolidation Analysis (Topic 810), which amends the current consolidation model. On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted this standard, modifying the analysis it must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The guidance does not amend the existing disclosure requirements for variable interest entities or voting interest model entities. The guidance, however, modified the requirements to qualify under the voting interest model. Under the revised guidance, the Operating Partnership will be a variable interest entity of the Company. As the Operating Partnership is already consolidated in the financial statements of the transferred collectionCompany, the identification of real estate entities and holdings, uponthis entity as a variable interest entity had no impact on the IPO. The combined financial information presented for periods on or prior to April 19, 2011 relate solely to STAG Predecessor Group. Theconsolidated financial statements of the Company. There were no other legal entities qualifying under the scope of the revised guidance that were consolidated as a result of the adoption. In addition, there were no voting interest entities under prior existing guidance determined to be variable interest entities under the revised guidance.

In August of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide certain disclosures when it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending December 31, 2016 and for annual periods after April 19, 2011 includeand interim periods thereafter with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this standard effective for the annual period ended December 31, 2016 and this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial informationstatements.

In May of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers(Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. While lease contracts with customers, which constitute a vast majority of the Company,Company's revenues, are a specific scope exception, certain of the Operating PartnershipCompany's revenue streams may be impacted by the new guidance. Once the new guidance setting forth principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and their subsidiaries.Wheredisclosure of leases (ASU 2016-02, as discussed above) goes into effect, the "Company" is referenced in comparisonsnew revenue standard may apply to executory costs and other components of financial results for any date priorrevenue due under leases that are deemed to be non-lease components (such as common area maintenance and including April 19, 2011,provision of utilities), even when the financial informationrevenue for such period relates solely to STAG Predecessor Group, notwithstanding "Company" beingactivities is not separately stipulated in the reference.lease. In that case, revenue from these items previously recognized on a straight-line basis under current lease guidance would be recognized under the new revenue guidance as the related services are delivered. As a result, while the total revenue recognized over time would not differ under the new guidance, the recognition pattern would be different. The Company is in the process of evaluating the significance of the difference in the recognition pattern that would result from this change. In adopting ASU 2014-09, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. The Company has not decided which method of adoption it will use. Additionally, this guidance requires improved disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for


F-11

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows—Supplemental Disclosures

        The following table provides supplemental disclosures related to the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):

 
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
Year ended
December 31,
2013
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
Year ended
December 31,
2012
 STAG
Industrial, Inc.
Period from
April 20, 2011
to
December 31,
2011
 STAG
Predecessor
Group
Period from
January 1, 2011
to
April 19, 2011
 

Supplemental cash flow information

             

Cash paid for interest

 $19,272 $15,044 $11,445 $2,433 
          
          

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities

             

Acquisition of tangible assets

 $ $ $(215,890)$ 
          
          

Acquisition of goodwill upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $(4,923)$ 
          
          

Acquisition of intangible assets upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $(83,442)$ 
          
          

Assumption of mortgage notes payable

 $ $ $(201,789)$ 
          
          

Fair market value adjustment to mortgage notes payable acquired

 $ $ $(675)$ 
          
          

Assumption of related party notes payable upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $4,466 $ 
          
          

Acquisition of intangible liabilities upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $1,066 $ 
          
          

Acquisition of interest rate swaps upon Formation Transactions included in the purchase price allocation

 $ $ $420 $ 
          
          

Acquisition of other liabilities upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $171 $ 
          
          

Issuance of units for acquisition of net assets upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $95,670 $ 
          
          

Disposition of accrued lender fees upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $ $4,420 
          
          

Assumption of bridge loan for Option Properties upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $ $(4,750)
          
          

Assumption of note payable to related party for Option Properties upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $ $(727)
          
          

Assumption of interest rate swaps to related party for Option Properties upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $ $(352)
          
          

Non-cash investing activities included in additions of land and building improvements

 $(11,934)$(440)$(440)$ 
          
          

Issuance of units for acquisitions of properties

 $11,499 $ $ $ 
          
          

Write-off of fully depreciated tenant improvements

 $1,254 $576 $ $ 
          
          

Write-off of accumulated depreciation

 $1,254 $576 $ $ 
          
          

Dividends and distributions declared but not paid

 $5,166 $11,301 $6,160 $ 
          
          

Accrued distribution upon Formation Transactions

 $ $ $ $(1,392)
          
          

Table


the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently in the process of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc.evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations, and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

expects that it will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018.


Use of Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAPgenerally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Real Estate


Rental Property and Deferred LeaseLeasing Intangibles

        Real estate investments are


Rental property is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The cost of real estate includes the purchase price of the property and leasehold improvements. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Significant renovations and betterments that extend the economic useful lives of assets are capitalized.


The Company capitalizes costs directly and indirectly related to the development, pre-development, redevelopment, or improvement of rental property. Real estate taxes, compensation costs of development personnel, insurance, interest, and other directly related costs during construction periods are capitalized as incurred and depreciated commencing with the date the property is substantially completed. Such costs begin to be capitalized to the development projects from the point the Company is undergoing the necessary activities to get the development project ready for its intended use and cease when the development projects are substantially completed and held available for occupancy. Interest is capitalized based on actual capital expenditures from the period when development or redevelopment commences until the asset is ready for its intended use, at the weighted average borrowing rate of the Company's unsecured indebtedness during the period.

For properties classified as held for sale, the Company ceases depreciating and amortizing the rental property and values the rental property at the lower of depreciated and amortized cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. The Company presents those properties classified as held for sale with any qualifying assets and liabilities associated with those properties as held for sale in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company allocates the purchase price of business combinations of properties based upon the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings, tenant improvements, mortgage debt assumed, and deferred leasing intangibles, which includes in-place leases, above market and below market leases, and tenant relationships. The portion of the purchase price that is allocated to above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease term plus the term of any bargain renewal options. The above and below market lease values are amortized into rental income over the remaining term plus the terms of bargain renewal options or assumed exercise of early termination options of the respective leases. The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on the Company's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and its overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of deferred leasing intangibles, are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships or assumed exercise of early termination options for in-place lease intangibles) as increases or decreases to depreciation and amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of above and below market leases is accelerated into rental income and the in-place lease value and tenant relationships are accelerated into depreciation or amortization expense over the shortened lease term.

The purchase price allocated to deferred leasing intangible assets are included in rental property on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and the purchase price allocated to deferred leasing intangible liabilities are included in deferred leasing intangibles on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets under the liabilities section.

In determining the fair value of the debt assumed, the Company discounts the spread between the future contractual interest payments and hypothetical future interest payments on mortgage debt based on a current market rate. The associated fair market value debt adjustment is amortized through interest expense over the life of the debt on a basis which approximates the effective interest method.


F-12

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Using information available at the time of acquisition, the Company allocates the total consideration to tangible assets and liabilities and identified intangible assets and liabilities. The Company may adjust the preliminary purchase price allocations after obtaining more information about asset valuations and liabilities assumed.

The Company evaluates the carrying value of all tangible and intangible real estaterental property assets held for use for possible impairment when an event or change in circumstance has occurred that indicates their carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes estimating and reviewing anticipated future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the asset and the ultimate sale of the asset. If such cash flows are less than the asset'sasset’s carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent by which the asset'sasset’s carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Estimating future cash flows is highly subjective and such estimates could differ from actual results.

        For properties considered held for sale, the Company ceases depreciating the properties


Depreciation and values the properties at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. The Company classifies properties as held for sale when all criteria within the FASB's Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") 360,Property, Plant and Equipment are met.

        The Company presents qualifying assets and liabilities and the results of operations that have been sold, or otherwise qualify as "held for sale," as discontinued operations in all periods presented if the property operations are expected to be eliminated and the Company will not have significant continuing involvement following the sale. The components of the property's net income (loss) are reflected as discontinued operations include operating results, depreciation and interest expense (if the property is subject to a secured loan).

        Expenditures for tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing commissions are capitalized and amortized or depreciated over the shorter of their useful lives or the terms of each specific lease. Depreciationamortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:

lives.

Buildings

Building40 yearsYears

Building and land improvements

5 -Up to 20 years

Tenant improvements

Shorter of useful life or terms of related lease
Above and below market leases and other deferred leasing intangiblesTerms of the related lease plus terms of bargain renewal options or assumed exercise of early termination options
Tenant relationshipsTerms of the related lease plus estimated renewal period
Assumed debt fair value premium/discountTerms of the related loan


Fully depreciated or amortized assets or liabilities and the associated accumulated depreciation or amortization are written-off. The Company evaluates acquisitions to determine if the acquisition represents an asset acquisition or business combination, and the Company accounts for all business combinations in accordance with ASC 805,Business Combinations. Upon acquisition of a property, the Company allocates the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings,wrote-off tenant improvements, and intangible assets including in-place leases, above market and below market leases and tenant relationships, as well as the fair value of debt assumed.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The Company allocates the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Acquired above and below market leases are valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below market fixed rate renewal options for below market leases that are considered bargain renewal options. The above market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the below market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below market fixed rate renewal options that are considered bargain renewal options of the respective leases.

        The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationships based on the Company's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and its overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of in-place lease intangibles and tenant relationships, which are included as components of deferred leasing intangibles, are amortized over the remaining lease term (and expected renewal periods of the respective lease for tenant relationships) as adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of leasing commissions, above and below market leases, the in-place lease value and tenant relationships are immediately written off.

        In determining the fair value of the debt assumed, the Company discounts the spread between the future contractual interest payments and hypothetical future interest payments on mortgage debt based on a current market rate. The associated fair market value debt adjustment is amortized through interest expense over the life of the debt.

        Using information available at the time of acquisition, the Company allocates the total consideration to tangible assets and liabilities and identified intangible assets, and liabilities. The Company may adjustdeferred leasing intangible liabilities of $2.6 million, $17.9 million, $0, respectively, for the preliminary purchase price allocations after obtaining more information about asset valuationsyear ended December 31, 2016 and liabilities assumed.

$1.2 million, $10.3 million, $0.8 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2015.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents in United States banking institutions that may exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. While the Company monitors the cash balances in its operating accounts, these cash balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or are subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. To date, the Company has experienced no loss or lack of access to cash in its operating accounts.

accounts, and mitigates this risk by using nationally recognized banking institutions.


Restricted Cash


Restricted cash may include tenant security deposits and cash held in escrow for real estate taxes and capital improvements as required in various mortgage loan agreements. Restricted cash also may include amounts held by the Company'sCompany’s transfer agent for preferred stock dividends that are distributed subsequent to period end.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Tenant Accounts Receivable, net


Tenant accounts receivable, net on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets includes both tenant accounts receivable, net and accrued rental income, net. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant accounts receivable that is estimated to be uncollectible. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $19 thousandapproximately $0.2 million and $0,$0.1 million, respectively.


The Company accrues rental revenueincome earned, but not yet receivable, in accordance with GAAP. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had accrued rental revenueincome of $9.3approximately $18.4 million and $6.4$16.1 million, respectively. The Company maintains an allowance for estimated losses that may result from those revenues. If a tenant fails to make contractual payments beyond any allowance, the Company may recognize additional bad debt expense in future periods equal to the amount of unpaid rent and accrued rental revenue. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had an allowance on accrued rental revenueincome of $0 and $0, respectively.


As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had a total of approximately $4.9$9.0 million and $4.8$6.1 million, respectively, of total lease security deposits available in the form of existing letters of credit, which are not reflected on the Company'saccompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets;Sheets. As of December 31, 2016 and $3.0December 31, 2015, the Company had approximately $5.4 million and $2.0$4.1 million, respectively, of lease security deposits available in cash.

cash, which are included in cash and cash equivalents on the


F-13

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of lease security deposits available in cash, which are included in restricted cash on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. These funds may be used to settle tenant accounts receivables in the event of a default under the related lease. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company's total liability associated with these lease security deposits was approximately $5.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively, which is included in tenant prepaid rent and security deposits on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Deferred Costs


Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs include costs incurred in obtaining debt that are capitalized.capitalized and are presented as a direct deduction from the carry amount of the associated debt liability that is not a line-of-credit arrangement on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements are presented as an asset in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs are amortized tothrough interest expense over the life of the respective loans on a basis which approximates the effective interest method. Any unamortized amounts upon early repayment of debt are written off in the period of repayment. For the year ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, period April 20, 2011 through December 31, 2011 and the period January 1, 2011 through April 19, 2011 amortizationrepayment as a loss on extinguishment of debt. Fully amortized deferred financing fees included in interest expense was $1.2 million, $1.1 million, $0.8 million, and $31 thousand, respectively. Fully amortized deferred chargesdebt issuance costs are removed from the books upon maturity of the underlying debt.


Leasing commissions include commissions, compensation costs of leasing personnel, and other direct and incremental costs incurred to obtain new tenant leases as well as to renew existing tenant leases, whichand are presented in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Leasing commission are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the related leases (and bargain renewal terms or assumed exercise of early termination options) using the straight-line method. If a lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial term, any unamortized costs related to the lease are written off toaccelerated into amortization expense. Changes in leasing commissions are presented in the cash flows from operating activities section of the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows.


Goodwill


The excess of the cost of an acquired business over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill of the Company of $4.9 million represents amounts allocated to the assembled workforce from the acquired management company.company, and is presented in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company'sCompany’s goodwill has an indeterminate life and is not amortized, but is tested for impairment on an annual basis at December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company takes a qualitative approach to consider


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

whether an impairment of goodwill exists prior to quantitatively determining the fair value of the reporting unit in step one of the impairment test.

The Company has recorded no impairments to goodwill through December 31, 2016.


Use of Derivative Financial Instruments

        The Company follows ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging for disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why the Company uses derivative instruments, (b) how the Company accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the Company's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Further, qualitative disclosures are required that explain the Company's objectives and strategies for using derivatives, as well as quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.


The Company records all derivatives on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.


In accordance with the FASB's fair value measurement guidance, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting arrangements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. Credit risk is the risk of failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the contract. The Company minimizes the credit risk in anthe interest rate swapswaps by entering into transactions with various high-quality counterparties. The Company'sCompany’s exposure to credit risk at any point is generally limited to amounts recorded as assets or liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.


F-14

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)



Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant accounts receivable, interest rate swaps, accounts payable, other accrued expenses, Unsecured Credit Facility (defined in Note 5), Unsecured Term Loans (defined in Note 5)unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes and mortgage notes payable.notes. The fair values of the cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued expenses approximate their carrying or contract values because of the short term maturity of these instruments. See Note 4 for the fair values of the Company’s debt. See Note 5 for the fair values of the Company's debt. See Note 6 for the fair values of the Company'sCompany’s interest rate swaps.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The Company adopted the fair value measurement provisions for its financial instruments recorded at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.


Offering Costs


Underwriting commissions and direct offering costs have been reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Indirect costs associated with equity offerings are expensed as incurred and included in Formation Transaction costsgeneral and offering costsadministrative expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Dividends


Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to stockholders, will differ from income reported for financial reporting purposes due to the differences for federal income tax purposes in the treatment of gains on the sale of real property, revenue and expense recognition, compensation expense, and in the estimated useful lives and basis used to compute depreciation. DuringIn addition, the Company's distributions include a return of capital. To the extent that the Company makes distributions in excess of its current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions would generally be considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes to the extent of the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares. A return of capital is not taxable, but it has the effect of reducing the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its investment.

The Company paid approximately $5.2 million ($1.88125 per share), $6.2 million ($2.25 per share) and $6.2 million ($2.25 per share) of the 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") dividends for the years ended December 31, 2013,2016, December 31, 2012,2015, and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, $6.2 million ($2.25 per share of Series A Preferred Stock), $6.2 million ($2.25 per share of Series A Preferred Stock) and $1.0 million ($0.36875 per share of Series A Preferred Stock) of Series A Preferred Stock dividends were paid,2014, respectively, that were treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. During

The Company paid approximately $4.6 million ($1.65625 per share), $4.6 million ($1.65625 per share) and $4.6 million ($1.65625 per share) of the year6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock") dividends for the years ended December 31, 2013, $3.3 million ($1.173175 per share of Series B Preferred Stock) of Series B Preferred Stock dividends were paid2016 and December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, that were treated as ordinary income for tax purposes.

The Company paid approximately $4.1 million ($1.355905 per share) of the 6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock") dividends for the year ended December 31, 2016 that were treated as ordinary income for tax purposes

The tax treatment of common dividends per share for federal income tax purposes is as follows:

 
 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 Year ended
December 31,
2012
 Period from
April 20,
2011 to
December 31,
2011
 
 
 Per Share % Per Share % Per Share % 

Ordinary income

 $0.9723  71.0%$0.6340  59.8%$0.3471  74.5%

Return of capital

  0.3703  27.0% 0.4260  40.2% 0.1186  25.5%

Unrecaptured section 1250 capital gain

  0.0137  1.0%        

Other capital gain

  0.0137  1.0%        
              

Total(1)

 $1.37  100%$1.06  100%$0.4657  100%
              
              

follows.
(1)
The fourth quarter 2012 common stock dividend of $0.27 per share was included in the stockholder's 2013 tax year. The December 2013 monthly common stock dividend of $0.10 per share will be included in the stockholder's 2014 tax year.
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 Per Share % Per Share % Per Share %
Ordinary income$0.944038
 68.0% $0.777244
 57.2% $0.843245
 65.9%
Return of capital0.445125
 32.0% 0.582756
 42.8% 0.436755
 34.1%
Total (1)
$1.389163
 100.0% $1.36000
 100.0% $1.280000
 100.0%
(1)The December 2014 monthly common stock dividend of $0.11 per share was included in the stockholder’s 2015 tax year. The December 2015 monthly common stock dividend of $0.115 per share was included in the stockholder’s 2016 tax year. The December 2016 monthly common stock dividend of $0.115833 per share will be included in the stockholder’s 2017 tax year.


F-15

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)



Revenue Recognition


All current leases are classified as operating leases and rental revenueincome is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease (and expected bargain renewal terms or assumed exercise of early termination options) when collectability is reasonably assured. Differences between rental revenueincome earned and amounts due under the lease are charged or credited, as applicable, to accrued rental revenue.income. Additional rents from expense reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses are recognized in the period in which the related expenses are incurred.


The Company earns revenue from asset management fees, which are included on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations in other income. The Company recognizes revenue from asset management fees when the related fees are earned and are realized or realizable.

Tenant Recoveries

By the terms of their leases, certain tenants are obligated to pay directly the costs of their properties’ insurance, real estate taxes, ground lease payments, and certain other expenses, and these costs are not reflected on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does not recognize recovery revenue related to leases where the tenant has assumed the cost for real estate taxes, insurance, ground lease payments and certain other expenses. To the extent any tenant is responsible for these costs under its respective lease defaults on its lease or it is deemed probable that the tenant will fail to pay for such costs, the Company will record a liability for such obligation. The Company estimates that real estate taxes, which are the responsibility of these certain tenants, were approximately $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, and $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. These amounts would have been the maximum real estate tax expense of the Company, excluding any penalties or interest, had the tenants not met their contractual obligations for these periods.

Termination Income

Early lease termination fees are recorded in rental income on a straight-line basis from the notification date of such termination to the then remaining (not the original) lease term, if any, or upon collection if collection is not reasonably assured.

On July 8, 2011,December 21, 2016, the Company entered into atenant at the Golden, CO property exercised its early lease termination agreement withoption per the tenantterms of two facilities, one located in Youngstown, OH and the other in Bardstown, KY.lease agreement. The agreementoption provided that the Youngstown, OHtenant's lease terminatedterminate effective JulyDecember 31, 20112017 and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of $2.0approximately $0.9 million. Of theThe termination fee paid, $0.2 million wasis being recognized on a replenishmentstraight-line basis from December 21, 2016 through the relinquishment of a security deposit at the Bardstown, KY property, $45 thousand was applied to the outstanding accounts receivable, and the remaining amountspace on December 31, 2017. The termination fee income of approximately $1.8$0.1 million was recognized as termination income and is included in rental income duringon the period April 20, 2011 toaccompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. 2016.

On October 18, 2013,20, 2015, the tenant at the Dayton, OH property exercised its early lease termination option per the terms of the lease agreement. The option provided that the tenant's lease terminate effective October 31, 2016 and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of approximately $0.2 million. The termination fee was being recognized on a straight-line basis from October 20, 2015 through the relinquishment of the space on October 31, 2016. On August 29, 2016, the Company sold the Dayton, OH property to an unaffiliated third party and recognized the remaining unamortized termination fee. The termination fee income of approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million is included in rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

On October 19, 2015, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement with the tenant located at the Creedmoor, NCSouthfield, MI building. The agreement provided that the tenant'stenant’s lease terminated effective October 31, 201319, 2015 and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of $2.5approximately $0.9 million. The full termination incomefee is included in rental income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations as the property was sold on October 31, 2013 to an unaffiliated third party.

        The Company earns revenue from asset management fees, which are included on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in other income. The Company recognizes revenue from asset management fees when the related fees are earned and are realized or realizable.

        By the terms of their leases, certain tenants are obligated to pay directly the costs of their properties' insurance, real estate taxes, ground lease payments, and certain other expenses and these costs are not reflected on the Company's Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. To the extent any tenant responsible for these costs under its respective lease defaults on its lease or it is deemed probable that the tenant will fail to pay for such costs, the Company would record a liability for such obligation. The Company estimates that real estate taxes, which are the responsibility of these certain tenants, was approximately $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, $6.92015.


On December 17, 2014, the Company entered into the first amendment to the lease with the tenant located at the Belfast, ME buildings. The terms of the amendment renewed 90,051 square feet of the premise and early terminated the remaining 228,928 square feet effective November 30, 2015. The tenant was required to pay a termination fee for the returned premise on or before October 31, 2015 in the amount of approximately $2.1 million, and the Company received the termination fee payment in full on September 23, 2015. This termination fee along with the reimbursement of certain miscellaneous costs per the lease amendment was being recorded on a straight-line basis from December 17, 2014 through the relinquishment of the space on November 30, 2015. On May 18, 2015, the Company entered into a second lease amendment with the tenant. The terms of the second lease amendment accelerated the termination of 35,295 square feet of the previously terminated square feet to April 30, 2015. The

F-16

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Company recognized the termination fee associated with the 35,295 square feet through the shortened lease life of April 30, 2015. The Company recognized the remaining termination fee over the shortened lease life of the remaining 193,633 square feet through November 30, 2015. The termination fee of approximately $2.0 million and $0.1 million are included in rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

On October 29, 2014, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement with the tenant located at the Tavares, FL building. The agreement provided that the tenant’s lease terminated effective December 30, 2014 and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of approximately $2.4 million including reimbursement of costs related to the sale of the property, which is included in rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2012, $0.5 million for the period January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, $3.5 million for the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011. This would have been the maximum liability of the Company had the tenants not met their contractual obligations. The Company does not recognize recovery revenue related to leases where the tenant has assumed the cost for real estate taxes, insurance, ground lease payments and certain other expenses.

2014.


Gain on the Sales of Real Estate

        Gain on sale of real estate is recognized pursuant to the provisions included in ASC 360-20,Real Estate Sales. Rental Property, net


The specific timing of the salerecognition of gain on the sales of rental property, net is measured against various criteria in ASC 360-20 related to the terms of the transaction and continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance associated with the properties. If the sales criteria for the full accrual method are not met,


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

the Company defers some or all of the gain recognition and accounts for the continued operations of the property by applying the finance, leasing, profit sharing, deposit, installment or cost recovery methods, as appropriate, until the sales criteria are met.


Incentive and Equity-Based Employee Compensation Plans


The Company grants equity-based compensation awards to its employees and directors typically in the form of restricted shares of common stock, long-term incentive planLTIP units, in the Operating Partnership ("LTIP units")outperformance programs, and an outperformance program.performance units. See Notes 6, 7 8 and 148 for further discussion of restricted shares of common stock, LTIP units, and the outperformance program,programs and performance units, respectively. The Company accounts for its equity-based employee compensation in accordance with ASC 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation. The Company measures equity-based compensation expense based on the fair value of the awards on the grant date and recognizes the expense ratably over the vesting period.

Income Taxes

        Prior to the IPO, the Predecessor was comprised primarily of limited partnershipsperiod, and limited liability companies. Under applicable federal and state income tax rules, the allocated share of net income or loss from the limited partnerships and limited liability companies was reportableforfeitures are recognized in the income tax returns of the respective partners and members.

period in which they occur.


Taxes

Federal Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and intends to continue to qualify as a REIT. The Company is generally not subject to corporate level income tax on the earnings distributed currently to its stockholders that it derives from its REIT qualifying activities. As a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and meet the various other requirements imposed by the Code relating to such matters as operating results, asset holdings, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. The Company is generally not subject to corporate level income tax on the earnings distributed currently to its stockholders that it derives from its REIT qualifying activities. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and is unable to avail itself of certain savings provisions set forth in the Code, all of the Company's taxable income would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax.


The Company will not be required to make distributions with respect to income derived from the activities conducted through subsidiaries that the Company elects to treat as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"(“TRS”) for federal income tax purposes.purposes, nor will it have to comply with income, assets, or ownership restrictions inside of the TRS. Certain activities that the Company undertakes must or should be conducted by a TRS, such as performing non-customary services for its tenants and holding assets that it cannot hold directly. A TRS is subject to federal and state income taxes. On June 24, 2016, the Operating Partnership, through its wholly owned subsidiary, transferred a vacant land parcel located in Burlington, NJ to the Company's TRS. On August 25, 2015, the Company's TRS acquired two vacant land parcels in connection with the Libertyville, IL acquisition. The Company's TRS recognized a net loss of approximately $0.1 million and $25,000, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, which has been included on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The TRS did not have any activity during the year ended December 31, 2014.


F-17

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The following table reconciles net income (loss) to taxable income for the years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 20122014.
 Year ended December 31,
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Taxable Income (in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Net income (loss)$35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)
Book/tax differences from depreciation and amortization66,763
 60,959
 49,672
Above/below market lease amortization6,213
 8,526
 6,253
Loss on impairments16,845
 29,272
 2,840
Book/tax difference on termination income678
 (1,815) 1,994
Book/tax difference on property acquisition costs4,498
 4,400
 4,279
Loss on extinguishment of debt(17) 
 686
Book/tax difference on accrued bonus payment1,170
 (337) 941
Book/tax difference on bad debt expense83
 2
 104
Book/tax difference on non-cash compensation7,188
 4,662
 4,706
Book/tax difference on gain on the sales of rental property, net(53,580) (10,653) (4,695)
Straight-line rent adjustments, net(2,495) (3,405) (3,255)
Book/tax difference on non-cash portion of interest expense1,631
 1,266
 979
Book/tax difference on prepaid rent of Sec. 467 leases(274) 1,887
 
Other book/tax differences, net284
 180
 78
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(4,069) (3,011) (3,414)
Taxable income subject to distribution requirement(1)
$80,506
 $62,588
 $56,483
(1)The Company distributed in excess of 100% of its taxable income to its stockholders during the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

State and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011.

Local Income, Excise, and Franchise Tax


The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to certain state and local income, excise and franchise taxes. Taxes in the amount of $0.6$1.0 million, $0.3$0.9 million and $0.3$0.6 million have been recorded in other expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013,2016, December 31, 20122015 and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011.

2014, respectively.


Uncertain Tax Positions

Tax benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained based solely on its technical merits, with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. The Company currently hasmeasurement of a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position that meets the “more likely than not” threshold is based on a cumulative probability model under which the largest amount of tax benefit recognized is the amount with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority having full knowledge of all the relevant information. As of December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no liabilities for uncertain tax positions.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        The following table reconciles net income (loss) to taxable income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

 
 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 Year ended
December 31,
2012
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31, 2011
 

Net income (loss)

 $4,902 $(10,199)$(9,227)

Book/Tax differences from depreciation and amortization

  46,389  24,048  12,625 

Above/Below market lease amortization

  6,544  4,837  2,776 

Loss on impairments

    4,563   

Formation Transaction costs

      3,169 

Offering costs

  27  68  78 

Book/Tax difference on property acquisition costs

  3,427  4,218  1,088 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    565   

Accrued non-recurring IPO bonus payment

    (1,000) 1,000 

Accrued bonus payment

  440  3,731   

Book/Tax difference on bad debt expense

  19  317  526 

Book/Tax difference on non-cash compensation

  1,846  1,375  560 

Book/Tax difference on gain on sales of real estate

  (3,915) (4,554) (1,231)

Straight-line rent adjustments, net

  (2,941) (2,796) (1,036)

Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps

    (215) (2,805)

Book/tax difference on non-cash portion of interest expense

  (106) (159)  

Other book/tax differences, net

  28  63  (73)

Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

  (7,785) (5,940) (1,768)
        

Taxable income subject to distribution requirement(1)

 $48,875 $18,922 $5,682 

(1)
The Company distributed in excess of 100% of its taxable income to its stockholders during the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively.

Earnings Per Share


The Company uses the two-class method of computing earnings per common share, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur from shares issuable in connection with awards under incentive and equity-based compensation plans.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Segment Reporting


The Company manages its operations on an aggregated, single segment basis for purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions and, accordingly, has only one reporting and operating segment.


F-18

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)



Concentrations of Credit Risk

Concentrations of credit risk relevant to the Company may arise when a number of financing arrangements, including revolving credit facilities or derivatives, are entered into with the same lenders or counterparties, and have similar economic features that would cause their inability to meet contractual obligations. The Company mitigates the concentration of credit risk as it relates to financing arrangements by entering into loan syndications with multiple, reputable financial institutions and diversifying its debt counterparties. The Company also reduces exposure by diversifying its derivatives across multiple counterparties who meet established credit and capital guidelines.

Concentration of credit risk may also arise when the Company enters into leases with multiple tenants concentrated in the same industry, or into a significant lease or multiple leases with a single tenant, or tenants are located in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their inability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected. The Company regularly monitors its tenant base to assess potential concentrations of credit risk through financial statement review, tenant management calls, and press releases. Management believes the current credit risk portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risk.

3. Real Estate

Rental Property


The following table summarizes the components of rental property, net as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Rental Property, net (in thousands) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Land $272,162

$228,919
Buildings, net of accumulated depreciation of $125,971 and $101,819, respectively 1,408,406

1,234,838
Tenant improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $28,388 and $26,283, respectively 24,974

23,586
Building and land improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $33,054 and $19,815, respectively 107,463

74,694
Construction in progress 9,298
 1,658
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $237,456 and $200,758, respectively 294,533

276,272
Total rental property, net $2,116,836

$1,839,967


F-19

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Acquisitions

The following tables summarize the acquisitions of the Company during the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012:

Year ended December 31, 2013

Property Location
 Date
Acquired
 Square
Feet
 Buildings 

Orangeburg, SC

  2/7/2013  319,000  1 

Golden, CO

  2/27/2013  227,500  1 

Columbia, SC

  2/28/2013  273,280  1 

DeKalb, IL

  3/15/2013  146,740  1 

Ocala, FL

  3/26/2013  619,466  1 

Londonderry, NH

  3/28/2013  125,060  1 

Marion, IA

  3/28/2013  95,500  1 

Mishawaka, IN

  4/5/2013  308,884  1 

Southfield, MI(1)

  4/9/2013  113,000  1 

Houston, TX

  4/9/2013  201,574  1 

Idaho Falls, ID

  4/11/2013  90,300  1 

Mt. Prospect, IL

  5/14/2013  87,380  1 

Williamsport, PA

  5/31/2013  250,000  1 

Belvidere, IL

  6/19/2013  1,006,960  8 

Kentwood, MI

  6/26/2013  85,157  1 

Marshall, MI

  6/26/2013  57,025  1 

Nashville, TN

  7/18/2013  150,000  1 

Catoosa, OK

  7/31/2013  100,100  1 

New Berlin, WI

  8/16/2013  205,063  1 

Hampstead, MD

  8/21/2013  1,035,249  1 

New Hope, MN

  9/20/2013  107,348  1 

Springfield, OH

  9/26/2013  350,500  1 

Orlando, FL

  10/8/2013  215,900  1 

North Jackson, OH

  11/6/2013  209,835  1 

Mebane, NC

  11/14/2013  383,500  1 

Shannon, GA

  11/26/2013  568,516  1 

Lansing, MI

  12/11/2013  160,000  1 

Harvard, IL

  12/17/2013  126,304  1 

Sauk Village, IL

  12/17/2013  375,785  1 

South Holland, IL

  12/17/2013  202,902  1 

Mascot, TN

  12/19/2013  130,560  1 

Janesville, WI

  12/27/2013  700,000  1 

Total

     9,028,388  39 
         
         

2015.
(1)
The Company also owns a 5.4 acre vacant land parcel adjacent to this building.
Year ended December 31, 2016
Location of Property Square Feet Buildings 
Purchase Price
(in thousands)
Biddeford, ME 265,126
 2
 $12,452
Fairfield, OH 206,448
 1
 5,330
Mascot, TN 130,560
 1
 4,500
Erlanger, KY 108,620
 1
 5,600
Three months ended March 31, 2016 710,754
 5
 27,882
West Chicago, IL 249,470
 1
 8,663
Visalia, CA 635,281
 1
 27,921
Norcross, GA 152,036
 1
 5,508
Reading, PA 248,000
 1
 9,594
Charlotte, NC 104,852
 1
 6,517
Three months ended June 30, 2016 1,389,639
 5
 58,203
Columbia, SC 185,600
 1
 7,300
Graniteville, SC 450,000
 1
 15,675
Fountain Inn, SC 168,087
 1
 7,025
Langhorne, PA 217,000
 2
 11,250
Warren, MI 268,000
 1
 18,700
New Castle, DE 485,987
 1
 27,500
Westborough, MA 121,700
 1
 7,885
Cedar Hill, TX 420,000
 1
 19,100
Forest Park, GA 799,200
 2
 24,915
Rock Hill, SC 315,520
 1
 9,850
Gardiner, ME 265,000
 1
 16,800
Three months ended September 30, 2016 3,696,094
 13
 166,000
Langhorne, PA 172,647
 1
 9,500
Grove City, OH 175,512
 1
 5,400
Olathe, KS 496,373
 1
 23,194
Houston, TX 223,599
 1
 13,444
Itasca, IL 202,000
 1
 20,641
Kenosha, WI 175,052
 1
 5,975
Oklahoma City, OK 80,400
 1
 3,400
San Antonio, TX 247,861
 1
 12,050
Wood Dale, IL 137,607
 1
 8,565
Hartland, WI 121,050
 1
 7,400
Earth City, MO 116,783
 1
 5,450
Spartanburg, SC 572,038
 1
 20,762
West Columbia, SC 119,852
 1
 5,725
West Chicago, IL 305,874
 5
 10,400
DeForest, WI 254,431
 1
 7,800
Montgomery, AL 332,000
 1
 8,750
West Chester, OH 269,868
 1
 11,150
West Columbia, SC 176,400
 1
 11,850
Brooklyn Park, MN 200,720
 1
 20,532
East Windsor, CT 126,111
 1
 7,725
Three months ended December 31, 2016 4,506,178
 24
 219,713
Year ended December 31, 2016 10,302,665
 47
 $471,798

F-20

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate (Continued)

Year ended December 31, 2012

Property Location
 Date
Acquired
 Square
Feet
 Buildings 

East Windsor, CT

  3/1/2012  145,000  1 

South Bend, IN

  3/8/2012  225,000  1 

Lansing, MI

  3/21/2012  129,325  1 

Portland, ME

  3/27/2012  100,600  1 

Portland, TN

  3/30/2012  414,043  1 

Spartanburg, SC

  4/5/2012  409,600  4 

Franklin, IN

  4/17/2012  703,496  1 

Muhlenberg Township, PA

  5/24/2012  394,289  1 

Avon, CT

  6/15/2012  78,400  1 

Orlando, FL

  6/15/2012  155,000  1 

Pineville, NC

  6/15/2012  75,400  1 

Buffalo, NY

  6/15/2012  117,000  1 

Edgefield, SC

  6/15/2012  126,190  1 

Arlington, TX

  6/15/2012  196,000  1 

Bellevue, OH

  7/18/2012  181,838  1 

Atlanta, GA

  8/1/2012  407,981  1 

Huntersville, NC

  8/6/2012  185,570  1 

Simpsonville, SC

  8/23/2012  204,952  1 

Simpsonville, SC

  8/23/2012  207,042  1 

Dallas, GA

  9/4/2012  92,807  1 

Mebane, NC

  9/4/2012  223,340  1 

Mebane, NC

  9/4/2012  202,691  1 

De Pere, WI

  9/13/2012  200,000  1 

Duncan, SC

  9/21/2012  474,000  1 

Duncan, SC

  9/21/2012  313,380  1 

Buena Vista, VA

  9/27/2012  172,759  1 

Gurnee, IL

  9/28/2012  223,760  1 

Auburn Hills, MI

  10/9/2012  87,932  1 

El Paso, TX

  10/9/2012  269,245  1 

Gloversville, NY

  10/9/2012  50,000  1 

Gloversville, NY

  10/9/2012  101,589  1 

Gloversville, NY

  10/9/2012  26,529  1 

Gloversville, NY

  10/9/2012  59,965  1 

Greenwood, SC

  10/9/2012  104,955  1 

Greenwood, SC

  10/9/2012  70,100  1 

Holland, MI

  10/9/2012  195,000  1 

Independence, VA

  10/9/2012  120,000  1 

Jackson, TN

  10/9/2012  250,000  1 

Johnstown, NY

  10/9/2012  52,500  1 

Johnstown, NY

  10/9/2012  60,000  1 

Johnstown, NY

  10/9/2012  42,325  1 


Year ended December 31, 2015
Location of Property Square Feet Buildings 
Purchase Price
(in thousands)
Burlington, NJ 503,490
 1
 $34,883
Greenville, SC 157,500
 1
 4,800
North Haven, CT 824,727
 3
 57,400
Three months ended March 31, 2015 1,485,717
 5
 97,083
Plymouth, MI 125,214
 1
 6,000
Oakwood Village, OH 75,000
 1
 4,398
Stoughton, MA 250,213
 2
 10,675
Oklahoma City, OK 223,340
 1
 12,135
Clinton, TN 166,000
 1
 5,000
Knoxville, TN 108,400
 1
 4,750
Fairborn, OH 258,680
 1
 9,100
El Paso, TX 126,456
 1
 9,700
Phoenix, AZ 102,747
 1
 9,500
Charlotte, NC 123,333
 1
 7,500
Machesney Park, IL 80,000
 1
 5,050
Three months ended June 30, 2015 1,639,383
 12
 83,808
Macedonia, OH 201,519
 1
 12,192
Novi, MI 125,060
 1
 8,716
Grand Junction, CO 82,800
 1
 5,254
Tulsa, OK 175,000
 1
 13,000
Chattanooga, TN 646,200
 3
 21,160
Libertyville, IL 287,102
 2
 11,121
Greer, SC 290,000
 4
 9,025
Piedmont, SC 400,000
 3
 12,000
Belvidere, IL 100,000
 1
 5,938
Conyers, GA 201,403
 1
 9,880
Three months ended September 30, 2015 2,509,084
 18
 108,286
Durham, NC 80,600
 1
 4,200
Charlotte, NC 124,680
 1
 5,423
Shreveport, LA 420,259
 1
 11,000
Dayton, OH 205,761
 1
 8,803
West Allis, WI 241,977
 4
 9,900
Loudon, TN 104,000
 1
 5,375
Garland, TX 164,914
 1
 7,600
Laurens, SC 125,000
 1
 5,535
Lancaster, PA 240,529
 1
 9,350
Grand Rapids, MI 301,317
 1
 9,400
Burlington, NJ 1,048,631
 1
 61,500
Three months ended December 31, 2015 3,057,668
 14
 138,086
Year ended December 31, 2015 8,691,852
 49
 $427,263

F-21

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate (Continued)

Property Location
 Date
Acquired
 Square
Feet
 Buildings 

Johnstown, NY

  10/9/2012  57,102  1 

Kansas City, KS

  10/9/2012  56,580  1 

Lafayette, IN

  10/9/2012  71,400  1 

Lafayette, IN

  10/9/2012  120,000  1 

Lafayette, IN

  10/9/2012  275,000  1 

Lansing, MI

  10/9/2012  250,100  1 

Marion, IN

  10/9/2012  249,600  1 

Novi, MI

  10/9/2012  120,800  1 

O'Hara, PA

  10/9/2012  887,084  1 

Parsons, KS

  10/9/2012  120,000  1 

Phenix City, AL

  10/9/2012  117,568  1 

Portage, IN

  10/9/2012  212,000  1 

Ware Shoals, SC

  10/9/2012  20,514  1 

Wichita, KS

  10/9/2012  80,850  1 

Wichita, KS

  10/9/2012  120,000  1 

Wichita, KS

  10/9/2012  44,760  1 

Wichita, KS

  10/9/2012  47,700  1 

Chicopee, MA

  10/26/2012  217,000  1 

Sterling Heights, MI

  10/31/2012  108,000  1 

Harrisonburg, VA

  11/29/2012  357,673  1 

Toledo, OH

  12/13/2012  177,500  1 

Woodstock, IL

  12/14/2012  129,803  1 

Kansas City, MO

  12/19/2012  226,576  1 

Smyrna, GA

  12/20/2012  102,000  1 

Montgomery, IL

  12/20/2012  584,301  1 

Statham, GA

  12/21/2012  225,680  1 
         

Total

     12,829,194  70 
         
         

        On October 9, 2012, the Company acquired 31 industrial properties from STAG Investments Holdings II, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of STAG Investments II, LLC (the "Fund"), which are related parties of the Company through common management. On October 31, 2012 and April 5, 2013, the Company acquired two additional industrial properties from the Fund. The Company and its Predecessor served as the asset manager of the Fund for all periods presented. Together, the acquisition of the 33 industrial properties (collectively referred to as the "STAG II Acquisitions") represented a significant acquisition of the Company.


The following table (in thousands) summarizes the allocation of the consideration paid at the date of acquisition during the yearyears ended December 31, 20132016 and the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, respectively, for the acquired


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate (Continued)

assets and liabilities in connection with the acquisitions of buildings at the date of acquisition identified in the table above (in thousands):

tables above.

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 Weighted Average
Amortization
Period (years)
Lease Intangibles
 Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 Weighted Average
Amortization
Period (years)
Lease Intangibles
 

Land

 $31,310  N/A $34,991  N/A 

Buildings

  223,420  N/A  269,616  N/A 

Tenant improvements

  2,526  N/A  10,624  N/A 

Cash escrow for capital additions

    N/A  785  N/A 

Above market leases

  8,219  5.8  16,728  10.0 

Below market leases

  (2,538) 7.2  (5,962) 6.5 

In-place leases

  50,005  5.8  63,397  6.6 

Tenant relationships

  21,257  8.2  26,241  8.2 

Building and land improvements

  9,133  N/A  7,488  N/A 
            

Net assets acquired

 $343,332    $423,908    
            
            
  Year ended December 31, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
Acquired Assets and Liabilities Purchase price (in thousands) Weighted average amortization period (years) of intangibles at acquisition Purchase price (in thousands) Weighted average amortization period (years) of intangibles at acquisition
Land $59,630
 N/A $45,117
 N/A
Buildings 283,758
 N/A 256,970
 N/A
Tenant improvements 8,670
 N/A 7,705
 N/A
Building and land improvements 29,073
 N/A 20,712
 N/A
Deferred leasing intangibles - In-place leases 62,533
 8.2 58,109
 5.6
Deferred leasing intangibles - Tenant relationships 30,446
 10.4 31,390
 8.0
Deferred leasing intangibles - Above market leases 10,576
 9.2 11,135
 7.3
Deferred leasing intangibles - Below market leases (12,971) 8.5 (4,022) 5.2
Above market assumed debt adjustment (75) 7.2 (418) 1.4
Other assets 158
 N/A 565
 N/A
Total purchase price 471,798
   427,263
  
Less: Mortgage notes assumed (4,037)   (26,267)  
Less: Contingent consideration 
   (300)
(1) 
Net assets acquired $467,761
   $400,696
  

(1)In connection with the acquisition of the property located in West Allis, WI, the Company withheld $0.3 million that was otherwise due and payable to the seller. Under the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company will pay the full amount to the seller by December 4, 2020, subject to the performance of the tenant under the in-place lease agreement.

On September 29, 2016, the Company assumed a mortgage note of approximately $4.0 million in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Rock Hill, SC. On September 29, 2015, the Company assumed a mortgage note of approximately $5.7 million in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Conyers, GA. On June 25, 2015, the Company assumed a mortgage note of approximately $4.9 million in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Charlotte, NC. For a discussion of the method used to determine the fair value of the mortgage notes, see Note 4.

On January 22, 2015, the Company acquired a property located in Burlington, NJ for approximately $34.9 million. As partial consideration for eight buildingsthe property acquired, on June 19, 2013, the Company (i) granted 555,758812,676 Other Common Units in the Operating Partnership with a fair value of approximately $11.5$21.9 million, based on the Company's NYSE closing stock price on June 19, 2013.(ii) paid approximately $1.2 million in cash, (iii) and assumed an approximately $11.8 million mortgage note. The issuance of the Common Units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company relied on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the Common Units. The remaining purchase price of approximately $40.1 millionmortgage note was paid in cash.

full immediately subsequent to the acquisition. On December 11, 2015, the Company acquired a property located in Laurens, SC for approximately $5.5 million. As consideration for the property acquired, the Company (i) granted 51,607 Other Common Units with a fair value of approximately $1.0 million, (ii) paid approximately $0.6 million in cash, (iii) and assumed an approximately $3.9 million mortgage note. The Company has includedmortgage note was paid in full immediately subsequent to the acquisition. For a discussion of the method used to determine the fair value of the Other Common Units issued, see Note 7.


The table below sets forth the results of operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for the properties acquired properties onduring the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition. The properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2013 contributed $16.7 million
Results of Operations (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015
Revenue $13,105
 $17,879
Property acquisition costs $4,386
 $4,382
Net loss $3,560
 $3,052

F-22

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to total revenue and $0.4 million to net income (including property acquisition costs of $3.0 million related to the acquisition of 39 buildings during the year ended December 31, 2013) during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)



The following tables set forth pro forma information for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively.December 31, 2015. The below pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the acquisitions outlined above occurred on


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate (Continued)

the first day of the applicable reporting period, nor do they purport to predict the results of operations of future periods. The pro forma information has not been adjusted for property sales.

Pro Forma
 Year ended
December 31, 2013
(in thousands,
except share data)(1)
 

Total revenue

 $154,866 

Net income(2)

 $11,780 

Net income attributable to common stockholders

 $1,715 

Weighted average shares outstanding

  42,364,125 

Net income per share attributable to common stockholders

 $0.04 


Pro Forma
 Year ended
December 31, 2012
(in thousands,
except share data)(3)
 

Total revenue

 $152,962 

Net loss(2)

 $(12,286)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(14,424)

Weighted average shares outstanding

  25,046,664 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders

 $(0.58)

Pro Forma (in thousands) (1)
 Year ended December 31, 2016 
Total revenue $277,811
 
Net income $46,139
(2) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders $30,269
 
(1)
Pro Forma (in thousands) (3)
 Year ended December 31, 2015 
Total revenue $282,235
 
Net loss $42,617
(2) 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $53,850
 
(1)The unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2016 is presented as if the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016 had occurred at January 1, 2015, the beginning of the reporting period prior to acquisition.
(2)The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 excludes approximately $4.4 million of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closed during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 was adjusted to include these acquisition costs. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 excludes approximately $4.4 million of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closed during the year ended December 31, 2015.
(3)The unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2015 is presented as if the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016 and the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2015 had occurred at January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2014, respectively, the beginning of the reporting period prior to acquisition.

Dispositions

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold 24 buildings comprised of approximately 4.2 million square feet with a net book value of approximately $90.3 million to third parties. These buildings contributed approximately $11.2 million to revenue (exclusive of termination income and acceleration of straight line rent) and approximately $1.3 million to net income (exclusive of termination income, acceleration of straight line rent, loss on impairments, loss on extinguishment of debt, and gain on the sales of rental property, net) for the year ended December 31, 2013 is presented as if2016. Net proceeds from the sales of rental property were approximately $152.1 million and the Company recognized a gain on the sales of rental property, net of approximately $61.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. All of the dispositions were accounted for under the full accrual method.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company sold six buildings comprised of approximately 0.8 million square feet with a net book value of approximately $17.2 million to third parties. These buildings contributed approximately $2.0 million to revenue (exclusive of termination income and acceleration of straight line rent and above market rent) and approximately $0.8 million to net income (exclusive of loss on impairments, gain on the sales of rental property, net, termination income, and acceleration of straight line rent and lease intangibles) for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net proceeds from the sales of rental property were approximately $22.2 million and the Company recognized a gain on the sales of rental property, net of approximately $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. All of the dispositions were accounted for under the full accrual method.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company sold four buildings comprised of approximately 0.4 million square feet with a net book value of approximately $10.2 million to third parties. These buildings contributed approximately $1.2 million to revenue (exclusive of termination income and acceleration of straight line rent and above market rent) and approximately $0.2 million to net income (exclusive of gain on the sales of rental property, net, loss on impairments, termination income and acceleration of straight line rent and above market rent) for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net proceeds from the sales of rental property were approximately $13.0 million and the Company recognized a gain on the sales of rental property, net of approximately $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. All of the dispositions were accounted for under the full accrual method.






F-23

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Loss on Impairments

The Company regularly reviews its portfolio and identifies properties acquiredfor potential disposition. The Company reviews its current properties for disposition to realize value created in the portfolio and enhance the quality of the portfolio by disposing of underperforming assets. As a result of this regular review, several properties were tested for impairment due to the change in the Company's estimated hold period of those properties.

The following table summarizes the Company's loss on impairments for assets held and used during the year ended December 31, 2013 had occurred at January 1, 2012,2016.
Property Location Buildings 
Event or Change in Circumstance Leading to Impairment Evaluation(1)
 Valuation technique utilized to estimate fair value 
Fair Value(2)
 Loss on Impairments
(in thousands)
Fairfield, VA 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Executed purchase and sale agreement 

 

Jackson, MS 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Executed purchase and sale agreement 

 

Jackson, MS 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Executed purchase and sale agreement 

 

Mishawaka, IN 1 Market leasing conditions(3)Discounted cash flows(4)

 

Newark, DE 1 Market leasing conditions Discounted cash flows(4)

 

Seville, OH 2 Market leasing conditions Discounted cash flows(4)

 

Sparks, MD 2 Change in estimated hold period Discounted cash flows(4)

 

Three months ended June 30, 2016   $10,598
 $11,231
Boardman, OH 1 Change in estimated hold period Discounted cash flows(5)

 

Holland, MI 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Discounted cash flows(5)

 

Pensacola, FL 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Discounted cash flows(5)

 

Three months ended December 31, 2016   $4,360
 $5,614
Year ended December 31, 2016   $14,958
 $16,845
(1)The Company tested the asset group for impairment utilizing a probability weighted recovery analysis of certain scenarios, and it was determined that the carrying value of the property and intangibles were not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows.
(2)The estimated fair value of the property is based on Level 3 inputs and is a non-recurring fair value measurement.
(3)This property was sold during the year ended December 31, 2016.
(4)Level 3 inputs used to determine fair value for the properties impaired for the three months ended June 30, 2016: discount rates ranged from 8.5% to 13.0% and exit capitalization rates ranged from 8.5% to 12.0%.
(5)Level 3 inputs used to determine fair value for the properties impaired for the three months ended December 31, 2016: discount rate of 12.0% and exit capitalization rates ranging from 10.0% to 12.0%.


F-24

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The following table summarizes the beginning of the reporting period prior to acquisition.

(2)
The net incomeCompany's loss on impairments for the year ended December 31, 2013 excludes $3.0 million of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closedassets held and used during the year ended December 31, 2013, and the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was adjusted to include these acquisition costs. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 excludes $3.6 million of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closed during the year ended December 31, 2012.2015.
Property Location Buildings 
Event or Change in Circumstance Leading to Impairment Evaluation(1)
 Valuation technique utilized to estimate fair value 
Fair Value(2)
 Loss on Impairments
(in thousands)
Hazelwood, MO 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Executed purchase and sale agreement 

 

Three months ended June 30, 2015   $4,400
 $2,645
Canton, OH 1 Change in estimated hold period(4)Discounted cash flows(5)

 

Jefferson, NC 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Market transactions for comparable properties 

 

Milwaukee, WI 1 Change in estimated hold period(3)Market transactions for comparable properties 

 

Three months ended September 30, 2015   6,515
 5,733
Canton, OH 1 Change in estimated hold period(6)Market transactions for comparable properties(7)

 

Cincinnati, OH 1 Change in estimated hold period Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Dayton, OH 1 Change in estimated hold period(6)Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Gloversville, NY 1 Change in estimated hold period(6)Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Jackson, MS 1 Change in estimated hold period(6)Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Jackson, MS 1 Change in estimated hold period(6)Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Rapid City, SD 1 Change in estimated hold period Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Sergeant Bluff, IA 1 Change in estimated hold period Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Sparks, MD 2 Change in estimated hold period Discounted cash flows(8)

 

Three months ended December 31, 2015   22,238
 20,894
Year ended December 31, 2015   $33,153
 $29,272
(1)The Company tested the asset group for impairment utilizing a probability weighted recovery analysis of certain scenarios, and it was determined that the carrying value of the property and intangibles were not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows.
(2)The estimated fair value of the property is based on Level 3 inputs and is a non-recurring fair value measurement.
(3)This property was sold during the year ended December 31, 2015.
(4)The letter of intent for the property included various contingencies, and was terminated subsequent to September 30, 2015.
(5)
Level 3 inputs used to determine fair value: discount rate of 9.0% and exit capitalization rate of 12.0%
(6)This property was sold during the year ended December 31, 2016.
(7)The future cash flows of the existing building were not estimated to generate a net positive cash flow. Accordingly, the property was valued at its highest and best use as a vacant/developable land parcel. Market transactions for comparable properties were utilized to estimate a land value. Estimated fair market value of the property represents the land value, less estimated expense of demolition of the building, plus estimated salvage value.
(8)Level 3 inputs used to determine fair value for the properties impaired for the three months ended December 31, 2015: discount rates ranged from 8.5% to 16.0% and exit capitalization rates ranged from 8.0% to 14.0%.


(3)
The unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2012 is presented as if the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2013 and the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2012 had occurred at January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2011, respectively, the beginning of the reporting period prior to acquisition.

On October 31, 2013, the Company sold a 243,048 square feet warehouse and distribution building located in Creedmoor, NC. The carrying value of the building prior to sale was $4.5 million. The sales price was $9.5 million and the Company received net proceeds of $9.3 million. A gain on sale of real estate of $4.8 million was recognized at closing under the full accrual method of gain recognition. On October 18, 2013,29, 2014, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement with the tenant located at Creedmoor, NC.the Tavares, FL property. The agreement provided that the tenant'stenant’s lease terminated effective October 31, 2013termination was contingent upon the sale of the property and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of $2.5 million. The building contributed $0.7approximately $2.4 million, (exclusiveincluding reimbursement of termination income and acceleration of straight line rent and above market rent), $0.9 million and $0.6 millioncosts related to total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2013,


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate (Continued)

December 31, 2012, and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively. The results of operations (inclusivesale of the property. The tenant’s termination, income) and the gain on sale are included in income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        On June 12, 2013,which was effective December 30, 2014, triggered the Company sold a 53,183 square feet flex/office building located in Pittsburgh, PA. The carrying value ofto test the building prior to sale was $4.4 million. The sales price was $5.1 million and the Company received net proceeds of $4.8 million. A gain on sale of real estate of $0.5 million was recognized at closing under the full accrual method of gain recognition. The building contributed $0.3 million, $0.5 million, and $0.4 million, to total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively. The results of operations and the gain on sale are included in income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

property for impairment. The Company tested the property located in Great Bend, KSasset group for impairment as of September 30, 2012 utilizing a probability weighted recovery analysis of certain scenarios, and it was determined that the carrying value of the property wasand intangibles were not recoverable from the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly, the property was written down to its estimated fair value resultingof approximately $2.5 million based on pricing obtained from third party market participants and the Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $2.8 million. This loss was recorded in a loss on impairmentimpairments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of $3.9 million (of which $0.7 million related to lease intangibles)Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. Subsequent to the impairment loss being recognized, on November 30, 2012, the Company sold the building for a sales price of $4.0 million in an arm's length transaction.December 31, 2014. The carryingfair value of the property prioris based on Level 3 inputs and this is a non-recurring fair value measurement.



F-25

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to saleConsolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Involuntary Conversion

On September 1, 2016 the Company had an involuntary conversion event, and the Company recorded an estimated loss on involuntary conversion of approximately $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company's insurance policy provides coverage for these losses, and accordingly the loss on involuntary conversion was $4.0 million. fully offset by the expected insurance proceeds. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining proceeds receivable from the insurance company are estimated to be approximately $1.4 million, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Deferred Leasing Intangibles

The Company receivedfollowing table summarizes the deferred leasing intangibles on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Deferred Leasing Intangibles (in thousands) Gross Accumulated Amortization Net Gross Accumulated Amortization Net
Above market leases $70,668
 $(32,868) $37,800
 $69,815
 $(31,554) $38,261
Other intangible lease assets 461,321
 (204,588) 256,733
 407,215
 (169,204) 238,011
Total deferred leasing intangible assets $531,989
 $(237,456) $294,533
 $477,030
 $(200,758) $276,272
             
Below market leases $30,791
 $(10,450) $20,341
 $19,923
 $(8,536) $11,387
Total deferred leasing intangible liabilities $30,791
 $(10,450) $20,341
 $19,923
 $(8,536) $11,387

The following table sets forth the amortization expense and the net proceedsdecrease to rental income for the amortization of $4.0 million. There was a gain of $3 thousand recognized at closing under the full accrual method of gain recognition. The property contributed $0 million, $1.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.4 million to total revenuedeferred leasing intangibles during the years ended December 31, 2013,2016, December 31, 2012, the period from April 20, 2011 to2015 and December 31, 2011 and the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, respectively. The loss on impairment, results of operations and the gain on sale are included in income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.

        On April 20, 2012, the Company sold a vacant warehouse and distribution facility located in Youngstown, OH containing 153,708 net rentable square feet. The carrying value of the property prior to sale was $3.0 million. The sales price was $3.4 million and the Company received net proceeds of $3.2 million. The property contributed $0, $0, $2.0 million and $0.2 million to total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, respectively. At closing, the Company recognized a gain on sale of real estate in the amount of $0.2 million under the full accrual method of gain recognition. The results of operations and the gain on sale are included in income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.

        On December 22, 2011, the Company sold a vacant flex/office property located in Amesbury, MA containing approximately 78,000 net rentable square feet. The carrying value of the property prior to sale was $4.2 million. The sales price was approximately $4.8 million and the Company received net proceeds of $4.5 million. At closing, the Company recognized a gain on sale of real estate in the amount of $0.3 million under the full accrual method of gain recognition. The property contributed $0, $0, $0 and $0 to total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19,

2014.

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate (Continued)

2011, respectively. The results of operations and the gain on sale are included in income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations on the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations.

4. Deferred Leasing Intangibles

        Deferred leasing intangibles included in total assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 December 31,
2013
 December 31,
2012
 

In-place leases

 $142,518 $108,363 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  (49,756) (28,289)
      

In-place leases, net

  92,762  80,074 
      

Above market leases

  57,283  50,699 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  (17,232) (10,362)
      

Above market leases, net

  40,051  40,337 
      

Tenant relationships

  77,260  61,050 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  (18,693) (11,298)
      

Tenant relationships, net

  58,567  49,752 
      

Leasing commissions

  33,107  23,376 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  (9,520) (5,984)
      

Leasing commissions, net

  23,587  17,392 
      

Total deferred leasing intangibles, net

 $214,967 $187,555 
      
      

        Deferred leasing intangibles included in total liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 December 31,
2013
 December 31,
2012
 

Below market leases

 $11,434 $9,878 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  (4,520) (3,007)
      

Total deferred leasing intangibles, net

 $6,914 $6,871 
      
      
  Year ended December 31,
Deferred Leasing Intangibles Amortization (in thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Net decrease to rental income related to above and below market lease amortization $6,213
 $8,526
 $6,254
Amortization expense related to other intangible lease assets $66,291
 $60,834
 $50,319

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

4. Deferred Leasing Intangibles (Continued)

        Amortization expense, inclusive of results from discontinued operations, related to in-place leases, leasing commissions and tenant relationships of deferred leasing intangibles was $42.5 million, $25.0 million, $12.9 million and $0.7 million for

The following table sets forth the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, for the periods from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, respectively. Rental income, inclusive of results from discontinued operations, related to net amortization of above and below market leases increased (decreased) rental income by $(6.5) million, $(4.8) million, $(2.8) million and $2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, respectively.

        Amortization related to deferred leasing intangibles over the next five years is as follows (in thousands):

of December 31, 2016.

 
 Estimated Net Amortization
of In-Place Leases,
Leasing Commissions and
Tenant Relationships
 Net Decrease to Rental
Income Related to
Above and Below
Market Leases
 

2014

 $41,754 $5,980 

2015

  33,004  6,201 

2016

  26,818  5,600 

2017

  21,011  4,240 

2018

  15,217  3,256 
Year Amortization Expense Related to Other Intangible Lease Assets (in thousands) Net Decrease to Rental Income Related to Above and Below Market Lease Amortization (in thousands)
2017 $63,474
 $4,514
2018 $50,375
 $3,383
2019 $38,258
 $2,813
2020 $29,681
 $2,402
2021 $20,915
 $1,288

        On June 11, 2012, the Company received notice from a tenant that the tenant was exercising an option in its lease to downsize its space from approximately 190,000 to 60,000 rentable square feet effective March 31, 2013. After determining the undiscounted future cash flows were not recoverable, the Company calculated the fair value of the lease intangibles. Using the remaining contractual lease payments for the reduced space and discounting the cash flows at a risk adjusted return for a market participant of 11.4%, it was determined that the fair value of the lease intangibles was $0.4 million, resulting in a noncash impairment loss of $0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, which is reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value calculation of the lease intangibles of $0.4 million was performed using Level 3 inputs, and this is a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

        As discussed in Note 3 above, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $0.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 related to lease intangibles at its property located in Great Bend, KS. The fair value calculation of the lease intangibles was performed using Level 3 inputs, and this is a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

5. Debt

        Payments on mortgage notes are generally due in monthly installments of principal amortization and interest. Payments on the Unsecured Term Loans and the Unsecured Credit Facility (each defined below) are generally due in monthly installments of interest.


F-26

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

5.



4. Debt (Continued)


The following table sets forth a summary of the Company'sCompany’s outstanding indebtedness, including mortgage notes payable and borrowings under the Company's Unsecured Term LoansCompany’s unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes and Unsecured Credit Facilitymortgage notes as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Loan
 Interest
Rate(1)
 Principal
outstanding as of
December 31, 2013
 Principal
outstanding as of
December 31, 2012
 Current
Maturity
 

Sun Life(2)

  6.05% $3,817 $4,079  Jun-1-2016 

Webster Bank(3)

  4.22%  5,834  5,984  Aug-4-2016 

Bank of America Unsecured Credit Facility(4)

  LIBOR + 1.45%  80,500  99,300  Sept-10-2016 

Union Fidelity(5)

  5.81%  6,551  6,898  Apr-30-2017 

Webster Bank(6)

  3.66%  3,121  3,203  May-29-2017 

Webster Bank(7)

  3.64%  3,360  3,450  May-31-2017 

Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan(8)

  LIBOR + 1.40%  150,000  150,000  Sept-10-2017 

CIGNA-1 Facility(9)

  6.50%  58,874  59,645  Feb-1-2018 

CIGNA-2 Facility(10)

  5.75%  59,990  60,863  Feb-1-2018 

CIGNA-3 Facility(11)

  5.88%  16,879  17,097  Oct-1-2019 

Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan(12)

  LIBOR + 2.15%  100,000    Feb-14-2020 

Wells Fargo CMBS Loan(13)

  4.31%  67,165  68,696  Dec-1-2022 
            

    $556,091 $479,215    
            
            

2015.
(1)
Loan Principal outstanding as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands)    Principal outstanding as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands) 
Interest 
Rate
(1)
    Current Maturity 
Prepayment Terms (2) 
Unsecured credit facility:          
Unsecured Credit Facility (3)
 $28,000
  
$56,000
 L + 1.15%
 Dec-18-2019 i
Total unsecured credit facility 28,000
  
56,000
  
    
           
Unsecured term loans:  
  
   
    
Unsecured Term Loan C 150,000
 
 L + 1.30%
 Sep-29-2020 i
Unsecured Term Loan B 150,000
  
150,000
 L + 1.30%
 Mar-21-2021 i
Unsecured Term Loan A 150,000
 150,000
 L + 1.30%
 Mar-31-2022 i
Total unsecured term loans 450,000
 300,000
      
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (3,392) (3,382)      
Total carrying value unsecured term loans 446,608
  
296,618
  
    
           
Unsecured notes:  
  
   
    
Series F Unsecured Notes 100,000
 100,000
 3.98% Jan-05-2023 ii
Series A Unsecured Notes 50,000
  
50,000
 4.98% Oct-1-2024 ii
Series D Unsecured Notes 100,000
  
100,000
 4.32% Feb-20-2025 ii
Series B Unsecured Notes 50,000
  
50,000
 4.98% Jul-1-2026 ii
Series C Unsecured Notes 80,000
  
80,000
 4.42% Dec-30-2026 ii
Series E Unsecured Notes 20,000
  
20,000
 4.42% Feb-20-2027 ii
Total unsecured notes 400,000
 400,000
      
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (2,034) (2,280)      
Total carrying value unsecured notes 397,966
  
397,720
  
 
    
           
Mortgage notes (secured debt):  
    
    
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) 
 3,229
 6.05% Jun-1-2016 iii
Webster Bank, National Association 
 5,513
 4.22% Aug-4-2016 iii
National Life Insurance Company 
 4,775
 5.75% Aug-10-2016 iii
Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. 5,384
 5,754
 5.81% Apr-30-2017 iv
Principal Life Insurance Company 
 5,676
 5.73% May-05-2017 iii
Webster Bank, National Association 2,853
 2,945
 3.66% May-29-2017 iii
Webster Bank, National Association 3,073
 3,172
 3.64% May-31-2017 iii
Wells Fargo, National Association 4,043
 4,115
 5.90% Aug-1-2017 v
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -1 Facility 35,320
 57,171
 6.50% Feb-1-2018 vi
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -2 Facility 36,892
  
58,085
 5.75% Feb-1-2018 vi
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -3 Facility 16,141
  
16,401
 5.88% Feb-1-2018 vi
Wells Fargo, National Association CMBS Loan 56,608
  
63,897
 4.31% Dec-1-2022 vii
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans 4,012
 
 4.78% Dec-15-2023 iii
Total mortgage notes 164,326
  
230,733
  
    
Total unamortized fair market value premiums 112
 447
  
    
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (873) (1,270)      
Total carrying value mortgage notes 163,565
  
229,910
  
    
Total / weighted average interest rate (4)
 $1,036,139
  
$980,248
 3.75%    
(1)Current interest rate as of December 31, 2016.  At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the one-month LIBOR (“L”) was 0.77167% and 0.42950%, respectively. The current interest rate is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums.
(2)Prepayment terms consist of (i) pre-payable with no penalty; (ii) pre-payable with penalty; (iii) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date; (iv) pre-payable without penalty two months prior to the maturity date; (v) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date; however, can be defeased; (vi) pre-payable without penalty six months prior to the maturity date; and (vii) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date; however, can be defeased beginning January 1, 2016. 
(3)The capacity of the unsecured credit facility is currently $450.0 million.
(4)The weighted average interest rate was calculated using the fixed interest rate swapped on the current notional amount of $450.0 million of debt, and is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums.

The aggregate undrawn nominal commitments on the unsecured credit facility as of December 31, 2013. At2016 was approximately $418.5 million, including issued letters of credit. The Company's actual borrowing capacity at any given point in time may be less and is

F-27

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


restricted to a maximum amount based on the Company's debt covenant compliance. Total accrued interest for the Company's indebtedness was approximately $5.7 million and $3.8 million as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, respectively, and is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the one-monthaccompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were approximately $2.3 million and $3.0 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization included as a direct deduction from the related debt liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were approximately $6.3 million and $6.9 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, amortization of deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs included in interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations was approximately $1.9 million, $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Also included in interest expense is approximately $1.0 million, $0.7 million, and $0.1 million of facility fees related to the Company's unsecured credit facility for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

2016 Debt Activity

On December 29, 2016, the Company drew the unsecured term loan with Wells Fargo, National Association and other lenders ("Unsecured Term Loan C") in the amount of $150.0 million. The Company incurred approximately $0.3 million and $26,000 in unused fees related to the Unsecured Term Loan C for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

On December 20, 2016, the Company amended and restated the unsecured term loans with Wells Fargo, National Association and other lenders ("Unsecured Term Loan A" and "Unsecured Term Loan B"). The transaction reduced the spread over the applicable rate, which is based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement, with no changes to maturity dates or other material terms of the loan. The spread over the LIBOR for the Unsecured Term Loan A was reduced from 1.65% to 1.30%, and the spread over the LIBOR for the Unsecured Term Loan B was reduced from 1.70% to 1.30%, assuming the most recently reported consolidated leverage ratios.

On December 8, 2016, the mortgage note held with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (Facility 2) was partially paid in the amount of approximately $3.6 million in connection with the sale of the Georgetown, KY property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The prepayment fees and associated unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.1 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the mortgage note held with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (Facility 2) was partially paid in the amount of approximately $6.2 million in connection with the sale of the Conyers, GA property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The prepayment fees and associated unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.2 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the mortgage note held with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (Facility 1) was partially paid in the amount of approximately $21.0 million in connection with the sale of the Charlotte, NC property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The prepayment fees and associated unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.9 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the mortgage note held with Principal Life Insurance Company, for which the property located in Conyers, GA served as collateral for the mortgage note, was paid in full. The prepayment fees and associated unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.1 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On September 29, 2016, the Company assumed a mortgage note held with Thrivent Financial for Lutherans of approximately $4.0 million in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Rock Hill, SC, which serves as collateral for the debt. The debt matures on December 15, 2023 and bears interest at 4.78% per annum. The assumed debt was recorded at fair value and a fair value premium of approximately $0.1 million was recorded. The fair value of debt was determined by discounting the future

F-28

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


cash flows using the then current rate of approximately 4.45% at which loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for loans with similar remaining maturities, similar terms, and similar loan-to-value ratios. The fair value of the debt is based on Level 3 inputs and is a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

On June 22, 2016, the mortgage note held with Wells Fargo, National Association (CMBS loan) was 0.1677%partially defeased in the amount of approximately $1.5 million in connection with the sale of the Gloversville, NY property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The associated defeasance fees and 0.2087%, respectively.unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.3 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On May 18, 2016, the mortgage note held with National Life Insurance Company, for which the property located in Charlotte, NC served as collateral, was paid in full.

(2)
This loan
On May 5, 2016, the mortgage note held with Webster Bank, National Association, for which the property located in Norton, MA served as collateral, was paid in full.

On April 26, 2016, the mortgage note held with Wells Fargo, National Association (CMBS loan) was partially defeased in the
amount of approximately $1.7 million in connection with the sale of the Parsons, KS property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The associated defeasance fees and unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.2 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On April 26, 2016, the mortgage note held with Wells Fargo, National Association (CMBS loan) was partially defeased in the
amount of approximately $1.8 million in connection with the sale of the Kansas City, KS property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The associated defeasance fees and unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.3 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On March 17, 2016, the mortgage note held with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (Facility 2) was partially paid in the amount of approximately $10.5 million in connection with the sale of the Gresham, OR property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The prepayment fees and associated unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.9 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On March 3, 2016, the mortgage note held with Wells Fargo, National Association (CMBS loan) was partially defeased in the amount of approximately $1.2 million in connection with the sale of the Wichita, KS property, which had served as partial collateral for the mortgage note. The associated defeasance fees and unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $0.2 million were written off to loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

On March 1, 2016 the mortgage note held with Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) ("Sun Life"), for which the property located in Gahanna, OH served as collateral, was paid in full.

2015 Debt Activity

On January 22, 2015, the Company assumed on October 14, 2011a mortgage note of approximately $11.8 million in connection with the acquisition of the building locatedBurlington, NJ property. The mortgage note was paid in Gahanna, OH. The property is collateral for this loan. The principal outstanding includes an unamortized fair market value premiumfull immediately subsequent to the acquisition.

On February 20, 2015, the Company issued $100 million of $0.2its 4.32% Series D 10-year unsecured notes ("Series D Unsecured Notes") and $20 million and $0.2of its 4.42% Series E 12-year unsecured notes ("Series E Unsecured Notes").

On June 25, 2015, the Company assumed a mortgage note with National Life Insurance Company of approximately $4.9 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(3)
This loan with Webster Bank, National Association ("Webster Bank") was entered into on August 4, 2011 in connection with the acquisition of the buildingproperty located in Norton, MA. The property isCharlotte, NC, which serves as collateral for this loan.

(4)
the debt. The spread over LIBORdebt matures on August 10, 2016 and bears interest at 5.75% per annum. The assumed debt was recorded at fair value and a fair value premium of approximately $0.1 million was recorded. The fair value of debt was determined by discounting the future cash flows using the then current rate of approximately 3.05% at which loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for this Bankloans with

F-29

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


similar remaining maturities, similar terms, and similar loan-to-value ratios. The fair value of America") unsecured revolving credit facility ("Unsecured Credit Facility")the debt is based on Level 3 inputs and is a non-recurring fair value measurement.

On September 29, 2015, the Company's consolidated leverage. The spread was 1.45% and 1.65% as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company paid unused fees of $0.6 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2013 was $119.3 million, assuming current leverage levels.

(5)
This loanassumed a mortgage note with Union FidelityPrincipal Life Insurance Co. ("Union Fidelity") was assumed on July 28, 2011Company of approximately $5.7 million in connection with the acquisition of the St. Louis, MO building. The property islocated in Conyers, GA, which serves as collateral for this

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc.the debt. The debt matures on May 5, 2017 and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidatedbears interest at 5.73% per annum. The assumed debt was recorded at fair value and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

5. Debt (Continued)

    loan. The principal outstanding includes an unamortizeda fair market value premium of $0.1approximately $0.3 million was recorded. The fair value of debt was determined by discounting the future cash flows using the then current rate of approximately 2.64% at which loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for loans with similar remaining maturities, similar terms, and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(6)
This loan with Webster Bank was entered into on May 29, 2012 in connection with the acquisitionsimilar loan-to-value ratios. The fair value of the building located in Portland, ME. The property is collateral for this loan.

(7)
This loan with Webster Bank was entered into on May 31, 2012 in connection with the acquisition of the building located in East Windsor, CT. The property is collateral for this loan.

(8)
This Bank of America unsecured term loan ("Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan") was entered into on September 10, 2012 and subsequently amended on October 7, 2013. The spread over LIBORdebt is based on Level 3 inputs and is a non-recurring fair value measurement.

On September 29, 2015, the Company's consolidated leverage ratio.Company entered into an amendment to the current unsecured credit facility with Wells Fargo, N.A. ("Unsecured Credit Facility") to increase the capacity thereunder to $450.0 million. Additionally, the accordion feature that allows the Company to request an increase in the aggregate commitments (subject to satisfaction of conditions and lender consent) was increased, such that if the accordion were exercised in full, total capacity would be $800.0 million. The spread was 1.40% and 1.65% asmaterial terms of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.the agreement, including the financial covenants, were unchanged. The Company swappedincurred approximately $1.0 million in deferred financing fees, which are amortized over the one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate for $100.0 millionremaining term of the Unsecured Credit Facility.

On September 29, 2015, the Company closed the $150.0 million outstanding on the Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan. The net settlements of the swaps commenced on the effective date of the swaps, October 10, 2012 (see Note 6 for further details). There was no remaining borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2013.

(9)
This Connecticut General Life Insurance Company ("CIGNA") credit facility originally was entered into in July 2010 (the "CIGNA-1 Facility"), which loan has various buildings serving as collateral and has no remaining borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2013.

(10)
This CIGNA credit facility originally was entered into in October 2010 (the "CIGNA-2 Facility"), which loan has various buildings serving as collateral and has a remaining borrowing capacity of approximately $2.9 million as of December 31, 2013, subject to customary terms and conditions, including underwriting.

(11)
This CIGNA credit facility originally was entered into on July 8, 2011 ("CIGNA-3 Facility"), which loan has various buildings serving as collateral. The CIGNA-3 Facility and has a remaining borrowing capacity of approximately $47.9 million as of December 31, 2013, subject to customary terms and conditions, including underwriting.

(12)
This Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo") unsecured term loan ("Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan") was entered into on February 14, 2013. The spread over LIBOR is based on the Company's consolidated leverage. The spread was 2.15% as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the Company swapped one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate on $125.0 million of the $150.0 million capacity on the unsecured term loan (see Note 6 for further details). The borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2013 was $50.0 million, assuming current leverage levels, and was drawn down by the Company on January 30, 2014.

(13)
This Wells Fargo loan ("CMBS Loan") was entered into on November 8, 2012 and is a non-recourse loan with 28 buildings serving as collateral.

2013 Debt Activity

        On February 14, 2013, the Company closed a $150.0 million unsecured term loan with Wells Fargo Bank with a maturity date of February 14, 2020. Borrowings under the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan bear interest at a floating rate equal toC with the one-month LIBOR plus a spread that will range from 2.15% and 2.70%, based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. The spread was 2.15% as of December 31, 2013. The Wells Fargo following terms.

Applicable TermsUnsecured Term Loan C
Maturity Date:Sep-29-2020
Eurodollar Rate(1):
L + 130.0 bps - 190.0 bps
Base Rate(1):
Base rate + 30.0 bps - 90.0 bps
Unused Fees(2):
17.5 bps
Annual Fee:$50,000
(1)The spread over the applicable rate is currently based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement.
(2)The unused fees began to accrue on November 29, 2015 and were due and payable monthly until all commitments were drawn.

The Unsecured Term Loan C has an accordion feature that allows the


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

5. Debt (Continued)

Company to increase its borrowing capacity to $250.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.conditions and lender consents. The Company incurred $1.4$1.0 million in deferred financing fees associated with the closing of the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan C, which will beare amortized over its sevenfive year term. The agreement includes a delayed draw feature that allowed the Company also incurred an annual feeto draw up to six advances of $50 thousand to be amortized over one year. The Wells Fargoat least $25.0 million each. As noted above, the Company drew the full $150.0 million of the Unsecured Term Loan has an unused commitmentC on December 29, 2016. The Company and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership are guarantors of the Unsecured Term Loan C. The agreement also contains financial covenants substantially similar to the financial covenants in the Unsecured Credit Facility.


On December 1, 2015, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (“NPA”) for a $100.0 million private placement by the Operating Partnership of $100.0 million senior unsecured notes (“Series F Unsecured Notes”).  Pursuant to the NPA, borrowings under the Series F Unsecured Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.98%. The Series F Unsecured Notes were issued on December 15, 2015. Upon all the funds being drawn, the Company paid a placement fee equal to 0.35%0.50% of its unused portion,the principal amount of the securities purchased by investors. The Company and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership are guarantors of the Series F Unsecured Note and the obligations under the Series F Unsecured Notes rank pari passu to the Company’s unsecured senior indebtedness, which is paid monthly in arrears. Duringincludes the period February 14, 2013 to December 31, 2013, the Company incurred an unused commitment fee of $0.3 million that was included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        On October 7, 2013, theWells Fargo Unsecured Credit Facility and the Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan were amended to reduce the spreads on the one-month Eurodollar Rate and the Base Rate (each as defined in the credit agreement) and to reduce the unused fee rates. Upon the execution of the amendment, theunsecured term loans. The Company incurred $0.3 million and $0.2approximately $0.6 million in deferred financing fees associated with the Series F Unsecured Notes, which will beare amortized over the then remaining three and fourseven year term.


On December 1, 2015, the Company amended the terms of the Unsecured Credit FacilityNPAs entered into on April 16, 2014 and BankDecember 18, 2014. The second amendment to the April 16, 2014 NPA and the first amendment to the December 18, 2014 NPA amended certain provisions to conform them to the provisions in the NPA entered into on December 1, 2015.

On December 11, 2015, the Company assumed a mortgage note of Americaapproximately $3.9 million in connection with the acquisition of the Laurens, SC property. The mortgage note was paid in full immediately subsequent to the acquisition.

On December 16, 2015, the Company drew the Unsecured Term Loan respectively. The amendment was considered a modification of terms; therefore, no deferred financing fees were expensed as a loss on extinguishment of debt. The following table compares the original terms to the amended terms of the Unsecured Credit Facility and the Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan.


Original TermsAmended Terms
Applicable Rates
Unsecured Credit Facility
and Unsecured Term Loan
Unsecured
Credit Facility
Unsecured
Term Loan

Eurodollar Rate(1):

one month-LIBOR + 165.0 bps - 225.0 bpsone month-LIBOR + 145.0 bps - 205.0 bpsone month-LIBOR + 140.0 bps - 200.0 bps

Base Rate(1):

Base rate + 65.0 bps - 125.0 bpsBase rate + 45.0 bps - 105.0 bpsBase rate + 40.0 bps - 100.0 bps

Unused Fees:

<50%, 35.0 bps; > 50%, 25.0 bps<50%, 25.0 bps; > 50%, 20.0 bps

(1)
The spread over the applicable rate is based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio.

2012 Debt Activity

        On June 27, 2012, the Company paid down the principal outstanding on the Bank of America, N.A. loanB in the amount of $8.1 million, which had an interest rate of 7.05%. The early extinguishment of the loan resulted in a gain of $18 thousand as a result of the acceleration of an unamortized fair market value premium. There were no pre-payment penalties associated with the loan.

        On September 10, 2012, the Company paid off the remaining balance under, and terminated, the Credit Facility, which was a secured facility, with proceeds from the Unsecured Credit Facility. The early extinguishment of the Credit Facility resulted in a loss of $0.5 million as a result of the acceleration of the unamortized deferred financing fees. There were no pre-payment penalties associated with the loan.

        On September 10, 2012, contemporaneously with the termination of the Credit Facility, the Company closed on a credit agreement for the Unsecured Credit Facility of up to $200.0 million with a

$150.0 million.


F-30

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

5. Debt (Continued)

sublimit of $10.0 million for swing line loans and $10.0 million for letters of credit and the $150.0 million Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated as lead arranger. The Unsecured Credit Facility has an accordion feature that allows the Company to increase its borrowing capacity to $300.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Proceeds from the Unsecured Credit Facility and the Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan have been used for property acquisitions, working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes.

        On September 10, 2012, the Company paid down the remaining principal outstanding on the Wells Fargo Master Loan in the amount of $18.7 million. The Company previously made a prepayment of $105.0 million on August 15, 2012 with proceeds from its common stock offering that was completed on August 15, 2012. The early extinguishment of the Wells Fargo Master Loan resulted in a loss of $0.4 million as a result of the acceleration of the unamortized deferred financing fees. There were no pre-payment penalties associated with the loan.

        On November 8, 2012, certain of the Company's subsidiaries entered into a non-recourse secured loan facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The loan agreement is a commercial mortgage backed security that provides for a secured loan in the original principal amount of approximately $68.8 million.



Financial Covenant Considerations

The Company'sCompany’s ability to borrow under the Unsecured Credit Facility, the Bank of America Unsecured Term Loanunsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, and the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan (together, the Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan and the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loanunsecured notes are the "Unsecured Term Loans") is subject to its ongoing compliance with a number of customary financial covenants, including:

a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of not greater than 0.60:1.00;

a maximum secured leverage ratio of not greater than 0.45:0.40:1.00;

a maximum unencumbered leverage ratio of not greater than 0.60:100;

1.00;
a maximum secured recourse debt ratiolevel of not greater than 7.5%;

0.075:1.00;
a minimum fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.50 to 1.50:1.00;

a minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio of not less than 1.75:1.00; and
a minimum tangible net worth covenant test; and

various thresholds on Company level investments.

test.

The Credit Facility and Term Loans contain financial and operating covenants and restrictions.unsecured notes are also subject to a minimum interest coverage ratio of not less than 1.50:1.00.  The Company was in compliance with all such applicable restrictions and financial covenants as of December 31, 2013.2016 and December 31, 2015.  In the event of a default related tounder the financing and operating covenants,unsecured credit facility or the Company'sunsecured term loans, the Company’s dividend distributions are limited to the minimum amount necessary for the Company to maintain its status as a REIT.

Each of the Sun Life loan, the Webster Bank loans, the Union Fidelity loan, the CIGNA-1 Facility, the CIGNA-2 Facility, the CIGNA-3 Facility and the CMBS Loan haveCompany’s mortgage notes has specific properties and assignments of rents fromand leases on the properties, that are collateral for these loans. The acquisition costs of these properties were financed by the loans and by collateral assignments of the specific leases


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

5. Debt (Continued)

and rents. These debt facilities contain certain financial and other covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such applicable restrictions and financial covenants as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012.2015. The real estate net book value of the properties that are collateral for the Company's debt arrangementsCompany’s mortgage notes was $262.7approximately $229.9 million and $269.1$268.8 million at December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, respectively, and is limited to senior, property levelproperty-level secured debt financing arrangements. The 2117 properties held as collateral for the CIGNA-1, CIGNA-2, and CIGNA-3 facilities with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company are cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized among the respective facilities.

Fair Value of Debt

The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s debt wasis determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for loans with similar remaining maturities, similar terms, and similar loan-to-value ratios. The discount rates ranged from 1.57%approximately 1.92% to 5.24%4.85% and 1.86%1.58% to 4.64%4.82% at December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, respectively, and were applied to each individual debt instrument. The applicable fair value guidance establishes a three tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s debt is based on Level 3 inputs. The following table presents the aggregate carrying valueprincipal outstanding of the Company'sCompany’s debt and the corresponding estimate of fair value as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 20122015 (in thousands):

.

 
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 
 
 Carrying
Amount
 Fair
Value
 Carrying
Amount
 Fair
Value
 

Mortgage notes payable

 $225,591 $228,996 $229,915 $242,175 

Unsecured Credit Facility

 $80,500 $80,500 $99,300 $99,300 

Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan

 $150,000 $148,781 $150,000 $150,000 

Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan

 $100,000 $97,302 $ $ 
  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
  Principal Outstanding Fair Value Principal Outstanding Fair Value
Unsecured credit facility $28,000
 $28,000
 $56,000
 $56,000
Unsecured term loans 450,000
 450,000
 300,000
 303,457
Unsecured notes 400,000
 399,091
 400,000
 392,054
Mortgage notes 164,326
 166,099
 230,733
 237,327
Total principal amount 1,042,326
 $1,043,190
 986,733
 $988,838
Add: Total unamortized fair market value premiums 112
   447
  
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (6,299)   (6,932)  
Total carrying value $1,036,139
   $980,248
  


F-31

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Future Principal Payments of Debt

The following table reflects the Company'sCompany’s aggregate future principal payments of the Company'sCompany’s debt at December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

2016.

2014

 $4,447 

2015

  4,688 

2016

  93,777 

2017

  165,506 

2018

  113,377 

Thereafter

  174,008 
    

Total aggregate principal payments

 $555,803 

Unamortized balance of historical fair value adjustments

  288 
    

Total carrying value of debt

 $556,091 
    
    
Year 
Future Principal Payments of Debt
(in thousands)
2017 $18,737
2018 88,578
2019 29,926
2020 152,006
2021 152,103
Thereafter 600,976
Total aggregate principal payments 1,042,326
Total unamortized fair market value premiums 112
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs (6,299)
Total carrying value $1,036,139

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

6.

5. Use of Derivative Financial Instruments


Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives


The Company'sCompany’s use of derivative instruments is limited to the utilization of interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk exposuresexposure on existing and future liabilities and not for speculative purposes. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/orand related costs associated with the Company'sCompany’s operating and financial structure,structure.

The following table details the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps as well as to hedge specific transactions.

of December 31, 2016.

Interest Rate
Derivative Counterparty
 Trade Date     Effective Date Notional Amount
(in thousands)
 Fair Value
(in thousands)
 Pay Fixed Interest Rate Receive Variable Interest Rate Maturity Date
PNC Bank, N.A. Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Bank of America, N.A. Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
UBS AG Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Royal Bank of Canada Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $6
 0.7945% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
RJ Capital Services, Inc. Sep-14-2012 Oct-10-2012 $10,000
 $5
 0.7975% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Bank of America, N.A. Sep-20-2012 Oct-10-2012 $25,000
 $21
 0.7525% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
RJ Capital Services, Inc. Sep-24-2012 Oct-10-2012 $25,000
 $26
 0.7270% One-month L Sep-10-2017 
Regions Bank Mar-01-2013 Mar-01-2013 $25,000
 $131
 1.3300% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
Capital One, N.A. Jun-13-2013 Jul-01-2013 $50,000
 $(274) 1.6810% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
Capital One, N.A. Jun-13-2013 Aug-01-2013 $25,000
 $(154) 1.7030% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
Regions Bank Sep-30-2013 Feb-03-2014 $25,000
 $(378) 1.9925% One-month L Feb-14-2020 
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $25,000
 $217
 1.3830% One-month L Sep-29-2020
PNC Bank, N.A. Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $50,000
 $421
 1.3906% One-month L Sep-29-2020
Regions Bank Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $35,000
 $292
 1.3858% One-month L Sep-29-2020
U.S. Bank, N.A. Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $25,000
 $207
 1.3950% One-month L Sep-29-2020
Capital One, N.A. Oct-14-2015 Sep-29-2016 $15,000
 $123
 1.3950% One-month L Sep-29-2020
Royal Bank of Canada Jan-08-2015 Mar-20-2015 $25,000
 $(16) 1.7090% One-month L Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Jan-08-2015 Mar-20-2015 $25,000
 $(18) 1.7105% One-month L Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Jan-08-2015 Sep-10-2017 $100,000
 $(1,240) 2.2255% One-month L Mar-21-2021
Wells Fargo, N.A. Jan-08-2015 Mar-20-2015 $25,000
 $4
 1.8280% One-month L Mar-31-2022
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Jan-08-2015 Feb-14-2020 $25,000
 $(50) 2.4535% One-month L Mar-31-2022
Regions Bank Jan-08-2015 Feb-14-2020 $50,000
 $(133) 2.4750% One-month L Mar-31-2022
Capital One, N.A. Jan-08-2015 Feb-14-2020 $50,000
 $(175) 2.5300% One-month L Mar-31-2022

On September 14, 2012,October 24, 2014, the Company commenced a program of enteringentered into seventwo forward starting interest rate swap agreements for a total notional amounts totaling $100amount of $170.0 million to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash flows associated with an effective datethe potential issuance of October 10, 2012 that effectively convert the one-month LIBOR rate on $100.0 million of the $150.0 million Bank of America Unsecured Term Loan, from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. Theselong-term debt.  The forward starting swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

        On March 1, 2013,risk and were terminated on November 21, 2014. The Company paid a termination payment of approximately $0.4 million to the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for notional amount of $25.0 million with an effective date of March 1, 2013 that converts the one-month LIBOR rate on the $25.0 million then outstanding balance of the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate of 1.33% plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. This swap was designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk.

        On June 13, 2013, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements for notional amounts of $50.0 million and $25.0 million with effective dates of July 1, 2013 and August 1, 2013 that convert the one-month LIBOR rate on the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate of 1.681% and 1.703%, respectively, plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

        On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $25.0 million with an effective date of February 3, 2014 that converts the one-month LIBOR rate on the Wells Fargo Unsecured Term Loan from a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio to a fixed rate of 1.9925% plus a spread based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. This swap was designated as cash flow hedge of interest rate risk.counterparties. The $25.0 million notional amount was drawn on January 30, 2014.

forward starting

F-32

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

6. Use of Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

        The following table details the Company's outstanding



interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2013 (collectively,effectively removed the "Unsecured Term Loan Swaps") (in thousands):

Interest Rate Derivative
 Trade Date Notional
Amount
 Fixed
Interest Rate
 Variable
Interest Rate
 Maturity Date

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7945%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-14-2012 $10,000(1) 0.7975%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-20-2012 $25,000(1) 0.7525%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 Sept-24-2012 $25,000(1) 0.727%One-month LIBOR September 10, 2017

Interest rate swap

 March-1-2013 $25,000(2) 1.33%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

Interest rate swap

 June-13-2013 $25,000(2) 1.703%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

Interest rate swap

 June-13-2013 $50,000(2) 1.681%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

Interest rate swap

 Sept-30-2013 $25,000(2) 1.9925%One-month LIBOR February 14, 2020

(1)
Fixesexposure to the interest ratevariability in future cash flows of the BankSeries D Unsecured Notes, and the $80 million series C 12-year unsecured notes ("Series C Unsecured Notes") and Series E Unsecured Notes at 2.452% and 2.615%, respectively. The settlement value of America Unsecured Term Loan

(2)
Fixesapproximately $0.4 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be amortized through interest rateexpense over the life of the Wells Fargorespective unsecured notes. The Series C Unsecured Term Loan

        STAG Predecessor Group entered into an interest rate swap ("Wells Fargo Master Loan Swap") with a notional amount of $141.0 millionNotes were issued on December 30, 2014 and the Series D Unsecured Notes and the Series E Unsecured Notes were issued on February 20, 2015 (refer to hedge against interest rate risk on its then outstanding variable rate loan with Wells Fargo, which was part of the debt contributed to the Company in its Formation Transactions and subsequently paid down on September 10, 2012. The Wells Fargo Master Loan Swap was not designated as a hedgeNote 4 for accounting purposes and it expired on January 31, 2012.

further details).


The fair value of the interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 20122015 was as follows (in thousands):

 
 Balance Sheet
Location(1)
 Notional
Amount
December 31,
2013
 Fair Value
December 31,
2013
 Notional
Amount
December 31,
2012
 Fair Value
December 31,
2012
 

Unsecured Term Loan Swaps

 Interest Rate Swaps-Asset (Liability) $225,000 $3,924 $100,000 $(480)

follows.
(1)
The individual interest rate swaps' assets and liabilities are not netted on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Balance Sheet Line Item (in thousands) Notional Amount December 31, 2016 Fair Value December 31, 2016 Notional Amount December 31, 2015 Fair Value December 31, 2015
Interest rate swaps-Asset $300,000
 $1,471
 $275,000
 $1,867
Interest rate swaps-Liability $375,000
 $(2,438) $400,000
 $(3,766)

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk


The Company'sCompany’s objectives in using interest rate swaps are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements.  The Company uses interest rate swaps to fix the rate of its long term variable rate debt. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.


The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualified as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss and is subsequently


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Noteswill be reclassified to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

6. Use of Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

reclassified into earningsinterest expense in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.earnings on the Company’s variable rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. Duringearnings into interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a gain of $0.1 million of hedge ineffectiveness in interest expense due to short-term, partial mismatches in notional amounts. For the years ended December 31, 20132015 and December 31, 20122014, the Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness.

        Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)ineffectiveness related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company's variable-rate debt. hedged derivatives.


The Company estimates that an additional $2.3approximately $2.4 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss as an increase to interest expense over the next 12 months.


The table below details the location in the financial statements of the gain or loss recognized on interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015, and 2012, respectivelyDecember 31, 2014, (in thousands):

.
 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. 
 
 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 Year ended
December 31,
2012
 

Amount of income (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on interest rate swaps (effective portion)

 $3,032 $(608)
      
      

Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into income (loss) as interest expense (effective portion)

 $1,373 $128 
      
      

Amount of loss recognized in income on swaps (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)

 $ $ 
      
      
  Year ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Amount of loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on interest rate swaps (effective portion) $2,244
 $5,387
 $6,705
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income (loss) as interest expense (effective portion) $3,142
 $3,431
 $2,508
Amount of gain recognized in interest expense (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) $66
 $
 $

        For the Wells Fargo Master Loan Swap, which was not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and expired on January 31, 2012, the Company recognized gains relating to the change in fair market value of the interest rate swap of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, $2.2 million for the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, and $0.8 for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, which is included in gain on interest rate swaps on the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.

        The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the interest rate swaps. The Company minimizes this risk exposure by limiting counterparties to major banks and investment brokers who meet established credit and capital guidelines.


Credit-risk-related Contingent Features


The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company's default on the indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, the fair values of all13 of the Company's23 of the Company’s interest rate swaps were in an asset position of $4.2approximately $1.5 million and 10 interest rate swaps were in a liability position of approximately $2.5 million, excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements. Accrued interest expense was $0.2 million as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements.  The adjustment for nonperformance risk included in the fair value of the Company'sCompany’s net asset position and net liability position was $0.3approximately $13,000 and $0.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013.

2016. Accrued interest expense for the Company's interest rate swaps was approximately $40,000 as of December 31, 2016 and is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.  As of December 31, 2016, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements.  If the Company

F-33

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

6. Use



had breached any of Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

its provisions at December 31, 2016, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreement of the interest rate swaps in a liability position plus accrued interest for approximately $2.6 million.


Fair Value of Interest Rate Swaps


The Company’s valuation of the interest rate swaps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined by using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. As

The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.  In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties.  However, as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company appliedhas assessed the provisionssignificance of this standard to the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps.

derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives.  As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.


The following sets forth the Company'sCompany’s financial instruments that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

2015. 

 
  
 Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2013 Using:
 
 
 December 31,
2013
 Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets:

             

Interest Rate Swaps

 $3,924 $ $3,924 $ 
    Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2016 Using
Balance Sheet Line Item (in thousands) Fair Value December 31, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Interest rate swaps-Asset $1,471
 $
 $1,471
 $
Interest rate swaps-Liability $(2,438) $
 $(2,438) $


 
  
 Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2012 Using:
 
 
 December 31,
2012
 Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Liabilities:

             

Interest Rate Swaps

 $(480)$ $(480)$ 
    Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2015 Using
Balance Sheet Line Item (in thousands) Fair Value December 31, 2015 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Interest rate swaps-Asset $1,867
 $
 $1,867
 $
Interest rate swaps-Liability $(3,766) $
 $(3,766) $

7.


F-34

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


6. Equity


Preferred Stock


Pursuant to its charter, the Company is authorized to issue 10,000,00015,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
On November 2, 2011,March 17, 2016, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 2,760,0003,000,000 shares (including 360,000 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' overallotment option) of 9.0% Series A Cumulative RedeemableC Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, (the "Series A Preferred Stock"), at a price to the public of $25.00 per share. OnNovember 2, 2016, the Company redeemed all of the Series A Preferred Stock. The table below sets forth the Company’s outstanding preferred stock issuances as of December 31, 2016.
Preferred Stock Issuances Issuance Date Number of Shares Price and Liquidation Value Per Share Interest Rate
Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 
 April 16, 2013 2,800,000
 $25.00
 6.625%
Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 
 March 17, 2016 3,000,000
 $25.00
 6.875%

Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, and Series CPreferred Stock (collectively, the "Preferred Stock Issuances") are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of March, June, September, and December of each year. The Series A Preferred Stock ranksIssuances rank on parity with each other and rank senior to the Company'sCompany’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The Series A Preferred Stock hasIssuances have no stated maturity date and is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. Generally, the Company is not permitted to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to November 2, 2016, except in limited circumstances


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Equity (Continued)

relating to the Company's ability to qualify as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary for the Series A Preferred Stock).

        On April 16, 2013, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 2,800,000 shares (including 300,000 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' overallotment option) of 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the "Series B Preferred Stock"), at a price to the public of $25.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of $67.8 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $70.0 million net of the underwriters discount of $2.2 million. The Company also incurred direct offering costs of $0.2 million. The underwriters' discount of $2.2 million and $0.2 million of direct offering costs incurred are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Company. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of March, June, September and December of each year. The Series B Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company's common stock and on parity with the Company's Series A Preferred Stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The Series B Preferred Stock has no stated maturity date and is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. Generally, the Company is not permitted to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock prior to April 16, 2018 and March 17, 2021, respectively, except in limited circumstances relating to the Company'sCompany’s ability to qualify as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary for the Series B Preferred Stock). control.


The Company used the net proceeds to pay off the then outstanding amount due under the Unsecured Credit Facility and to fund acquisitions.

        The tabletables below setsset forth the dividends that have been declared byattributable to the Company's board of directors on the Series A Preferred Stock Issuances during the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012, respectively:

2015.

Amount Declared During Quarter Ended 2013
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid
Quarter Ended 2016 Declaration Date Series A
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Series B
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Series C
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Payment Date

December 31

 November 1, 2013 $0.5625 December 31, 2013 November 2, 2016
(1) 
$0.19375
(1) 
$0.4140625
 $0.4296875
 December 30, 2016

September 30

 August 2, 2013 0.5625 September 30, 2013 August 1, 2016 0.56250
 0.4140625
 0.4296875
 September 30, 2016

June 30

 May 6, 2013 0.5625 July 1, 2013 May 2, 2016 0.56250
 0.4140625
 0.4965300
(2) 
June 30, 2016

March 31

 March 1, 2013 0.5625 April 1, 2013 February 22, 2016 0.56250
 0.4140625
 
 March 31, 2016
      

Total 2013

   $2.25  
Total   $1.88125
 $1.6562500
 $1.3559050
  


(1)On September 26, 2016 the board of directors approved the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock. On November 2, 2016 the Company redeemed all of the Series A Preferred Stock, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the redemption date, without interest.
(2)Dividends for the Series C Preferred Stock were accrued and cumulative from and including March 17, 2016 to the first payment date on June 30, 2016.

Amount Declared During Quarter Ended 2012
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid
Quarter Ended 2015 Declaration Date Series A
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Series B
Preferred Stock Per Share
 Payment Date

December 31

 November 2, 2012 $0.5625 December 31, 2012 October 22, 2015 $0.5625
 $0.4140625
 December 31, 2015

September 30

 August 2, 2012 0.5625 October 1, 2012 July 21, 2015  0.5625
 0.4140625
 September 30, 2015

June 30

 May 15, 2012 0.5625 July 2, 2012 May 4, 2015 0.5625
 0.4140625
 June 30, 2015

March 31

 March 6, 2012 0.5625 April 2, 2012 February 20, 2015 0.5625
 0.4140625
 March 31, 2015 
      

Total 2012

   $2.25  
Total   $2.2500
 $1.6562500
 

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Equity (Continued)

        The table below sets forth

On February 15, 2017, the dividends that have been declared by the Company'sCompany’s board of directors ondeclared the Series B Preferred Stock duringand the year ended DecemberSeries C Preferred Stock dividend for the quarter ending March 31, 2013:

Amount Declared During Quarter Ended 2013
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid

December 31

 November 1, 2013 $0.4140625 December 31, 2013

September 30

 August 2, 2013  0.4140625 September 30, 2013

June 30 (prorated for April 16, 2013 to June 30, 2013)

 May 6, 2013  0.3450500 July 1, 2013
       

Total 2013

   $1.1731750  

Common Stock

        On April 20, 2011, the Company completed the IPO of its common stock. The IPO resulted in the sale of 13,750,000 shares of the Company's common stock2017 at a pricequarterly rate of $13.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of $166.3 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $178.8 million, net of underwriting fees of $12.5 million. On May 13, 2011, the underwriters of the Company's IPO exercised their option to purchase an additional 2,062,500 shares of common stock at $13.00$0.4140625 per share generating an additional $26.8 million of gross proceeds and $24.9 million of net proceeds after the underwriters' discount and offering costs. The total gross proceeds to the Company from the IPO and the exercise of the overallotment option was approximately $205.6 million. The Company incurred Formation Transaction costs and offering costs of $6.2 million, of which $3.7 million was expensed and the remaining $2.5 million was deducted from the gross proceeds of the IPO. Total underwriters' discounts, commissions and offering costs of $16.9 million are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company.

        On May 29, 2012, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 8,337,500 of shares common stock at a public offering price of $12.88$0.4296875 per share, inclusive of 1,087,500 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' overallotment option. The Company received net proceeds of $102.8 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $107.4 million, net of underwriting discounts of $4.6 million. The Company also incurred direct offering costs of $0.5 million. The underwriters' discount of $4.6 million and $0.5 million of direct offering costs incurred are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company. The Company also incurred $0.1 million of indirect offering costs, which are included in offering costs on the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.

        On August 15, 2012, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 9,200,000 of shares common stock at a public offering price of $14.15 per share, inclusive of 1,200,000 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' option. The Company received net proceeds of $124.6 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $130.2 million, net of the underwriters' discount of $5.5 million. The Company also incurred direct offering costs of $0.2 million. The underwriters' discount of $5.5 million and $0.2 million of direct offering costs incurred are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company.

respectively.


F-35

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Equity (Continued)

        On December 14, 2012,



Common Stock

The following sets forth the Company announced that it had established an "at the market"Company’s at-the market ("ATM") common stock offering program through which it may sell from time to time up to an aggregate of $75.0 million of its common stock through sales agents. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company sold 2,672,692 and 298,000 shares of common stock, respectively, under its ATM. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company received net proceeds of $53.9 million and $5.3 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $54.7 million and $5.4 million, net of the sales agents' fees of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The Company used the net proceeds for acquisitions and general corporate purposes. Asprograms as of December 31, 2013, there was approximately $14.9 million of2016.
ATM Stock Offering Program (in thousands) Date Maximum Aggregate Offering Price
(in thousands)
 Aggregate Common Stock Available as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands)
2016 $228 million ATM November 8, 2016 $228,218
 $117,331

The tables below set forth the activity for the ATM common stock available to be sold under the ATM.

        On January 22, 2013, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 6,284,152 shares of common stock (including 819,672 shares issued pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters' option) at a public offering price of $18.30 per share. The Company received net proceeds of $110.1 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $115.0 million net of the underwriters discount of $4.9 million. The Company also incurred direct offering costs of $0.2 million. The underwriters' discount of $4.9 million and $0.2 million of direct offering costs incurred are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Company. The Company used the proceeds to fully pay down the then outstanding balance on the Unsecured Credit Facility.

        On August 15, 2013, the Company's board of directors voted to increase the frequency of the payment of the Company's common stock dividend from quarterly to monthly. On September 24, 2013, the Company's board of directors declared dividends on the Company's common stock for each month of the fourth quarter of $0.10 per share, which equates to $0.30 per share on a quarterly basis.

        The table below sets forth the dividends that have been declared by the Company's board of directors on its common stockprograms during the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012, respectively:

2015 (in thousands, except share data).

Amount Declared During 2013
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid

Month ended December 31

 September 24, 2013 $0.10 January 15, 2014

Month ended November 30

 September 24, 2013  0.10 December 16, 2013

Month ended October 31

 September 24, 2013  0.10 November 15, 2013

Quarter ended September 30

 August 2, 2013  0.30 October 15, 2013

Quarter ended June 30

 May 6, 2013  0.30 July 15, 2013

Quarter ended March 31

 March 1, 2013  0.30 April 15, 2013
       

Total 2013

   $1.20  
  Year ended December 31, 2016
ATM Stock Offering Program Shares
Sold
 Weighted Average Price Per Share Gross
Proceeds
 Sales
Agents’ Fee
 Net
Proceeds
2016 $228 million ATM 4,763,838
 $23.28
 $110,887
 $1,550
 $109,337
2016 $200 million ATM(1)
 7,326,200
 $23.45
 171,782
 2,429
 169,353
Total/weighted average 12,090,038
 $23.38
 $282,669
 $3,979
 $278,690


(1)This program ended before December 31, 2016.

Amount Declared During Quarter Ended 2012
 Declaration Date Per Share Date Paid

December 31

 November 2, 2012 $0.27 January 15, 2013

September 30

 August 2, 2012  0.27 October 15, 2012

June 30

 May 15, 2012  0.27 July 13, 2012

March 31

 March 6, 2012  0.26 April 13, 2012
       

Total 2012

   $1.07  
  Year ended December 31, 2015
ATM Stock Offering Program Shares
Sold
 Weighted Average Price Per Share Gross
Proceeds
 Sales
Agents’ Fee
 Net
Proceeds
2014 $200 million ATM(1)
 2,661,403
 $21.63
 $57,571
 $864
 $56,707
2014 $150 million ATM(1)
 795,000
 $21.79
 17,321
 260
 17,061
Total/weighted average 3,456,403
 $21.67
 $74,892
 $1,124
 $73,768
(1)This program ended before December 31, 2016.


F-36

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Equity (Continued)



Dividends

The tables below set forth the dividends attributable to the common stock that were declared or paid during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Month Ended 2016 Declaration Date Record Date Per Share Payment Date
December 31 August 1, 2016 December 30, 2016 $0.115833
 January 17, 2017
November 30 August 1, 2016 November 30, 2016 0.115833
 December 15, 2016
October 31 August 1, 2016 October 31, 2016 0.115833
 November 15, 2016
September 30 May 2, 2016 September 30, 2016 0.115833
 October 17, 2016
August 31 May 2, 2016 August 31, 2016 0.115833
 September 15, 2016
July 31 May 2, 2016 July 29, 2016 0.115833
 August 15, 2016
June 30 February 22, 2016 June 30, 2016 0.115833
 July 15, 2016
May 31 February 22, 2016 May 31, 2016 0.115833
 June 15, 2016
April 30 February 22, 2016 April 29, 2016 0.115833
 May 16, 2016
March 31 October 22, 2015 March 31, 2016 0.115833
 April 15, 2016
February 29 October 22, 2015 February 29, 2016 0.115833
 March 15, 2016
January 31 October 22, 2015 January 29, 2016 0.115833
 February 16, 2016
Total     $1.389996
  
Month Ended 2015 Declaration Date Record Date Per Share Payment Date
December 31 July 21, 2015 December 31, 2015 $0.1150
 January 15, 2016
November 30 July 21, 2015 November 30, 2015 0.1150
 December 15, 2015
October 31 July 21, 2015 October 30, 2015 0.1150
 November 16, 2015
September 30 May 4, 2015 September 30, 2015 0.1150
 October 15, 2015
August 31 May 4, 2015 August 31, 2015 0.1150
 September 15, 2015
July 31 May 4, 2015 July 31, 2015 0.1150
 August 17, 2015
June 30 February 20, 2015 June 30, 2015 0.1125
 July 15, 2015
May 31 February 20, 2015 May 29, 2015 0.1125
 June 15, 2015
April 30 February 20, 2015 April 30, 2015 0.1125
 May 15, 2015
March 31 October 30, 2014 March 31, 2015 0.1125
 April 15, 2015
February 28 October 30, 2014 February 27, 2015 0.1125
 March 16, 2015
January 31 October 30, 2014 January 31, 2015 0.1125
 February 17, 2015
Total     $1.3650
  

On December 18, 2013,November 2, 2016, the Company'sCompany’s board of directors approved a 5% increase indeclared the Company's annual common stock dividend fromfor the 2013 annualmonths ending January 31, 2017, February 28, 2017 and March 31, 2017 at a monthly rate of $1.20$0.116667 per share to $1.26 per share commencing withof common stock. On February 15, 2017, the paymentCompany’s board of directors declared the January 2014 common stock dividend to be paid in February 2014.

        Allfor the months ending April 30, 2017, May 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 at a monthly rate of the Company's independent directors elected to receive shares$0.116667 per share of common stock in lieustock.


F-37


Restricted Stock-Based Compensation

Pursuant to the independent directors pursuant to the STAG Industrial, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2011 Plan"). The number of shares of common stock granted is calculated based on the trailing 10-day average common stock price ending on the third business day preceding the grant date. The fair value of the shares of the common stock granted is calculated based on the closing stock price per the NYSE on the grant date multiplied by the number of shares of common stock granted. The table below sets forth the grants of common stock for the members' service during quarters ended in 2013 and 2012 as below:

Service During Quarter Ended 2013
 Grant Date Shares Fair Value 

December 31

 January 15, 2014  2,554 $52,000 

September 30

 October 15, 2013  2,607  53,000 

June 30

 July 15, 2013  2,602  53,000 

March 31

 April 15, 2013  2,418  52,000 
        

Total 2013

    10,181 $210,000 


Service During Quarter Ended 2012
 Grant Date Shares Fair Value 

December 31

 January 15, 2013  2,851 $54,000 

September 30

 October 15, 2012  2,876  49,000 

June 30

 July 13, 2012  3,108  46,000 

March 31

 April 13, 2012  3,776  50,000 
        

Total 2012

    12,611 $199,000 

Restricted Stock-Based Compensation

        Concurrently with the closing of the IPO, the Company granted a total of 80,809grants restricted shares of common stock with a fair value of $1.0 million ($12.21 per share) to certain employees of the Company pursuant to the 2011 Plan.Company. The restricted shares of restricted common stock are subject to time-based vesting and will vest,vesting. Restricted shares of common stock granted on January 8, 2016, subject to the recipient'srecipient’s continued employment, will vest in fivefour equal installments on January 1 of each anniversaryyear beginning in 2017. Refer to Note 14 for details on restricted shares of the date of grant.common stock granted on January 6, 2017. Holders of restricted shares of common stock have voting rights and rights to receive dividends. Restricted shares of common stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of and isare subject to a risk of forfeiture prior to the expiration of the applicable vesting period. The restricted stock fair value onfollowing table summarizes activity related to the date of grant is amortized on a straight-line basis as non-cash compensation expense over the service period during which term the stock fully vests.

        On January 3, 2012, the Company granted 87,025Company’s unvested restricted shares of time-based restricted common stock to certain employees of the Company pursuant to the 2011 Plan, with a fair value of $1.0 million ($11.89 per share).


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Equity (Continued)

        On January 3, 2013, the Company granted 106,268 shares of time-based restricted common stock to certain employees of the Company pursuant to the 2011 Plan, with a fair value of $1.9 million ($18.11 per share).

        During the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, 32,012, 16,161 and 0 restricted shares vested with fair values of $0.6 million, $0.2 million and $0, respectively. The Company recognizes non-cash compensation expense ratably over the vesting period, and accordingly, the Company recognized $0.8 million and $0.4 million in non-cash compensation expense related to restricted shares for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Unrecognized2015.

Unvested Restricted Shares of Common Stock Shares    
Balance at December 31, 2014 263,916
 
Granted 94,290
(1)
Vested (72,185) 
Forfeited (14,906) 
Balance at December 31, 2015 271,115
 
Granted 101,289
(2)
Vested (98,746) 
Forfeited (1,321) 
Balance at December 31, 2016 272,337
 
(1)The grant date fair value per share was $26.17.
(2)The grant date fair value per share was $17.98.

The unrecognized compensation expense associated with the Company’s restricted shares of common stock at December 31, 2016 was approximately $3.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years.
The following table summarizes the fair value at vesting date for the remaining liferestricted shares of these awards was $2.5 million and $1.5 million as ofcommon stock vested during the years ended December 31, 20132016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2012, respectively. As2014.  
  Year ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Vested restricted shares of common stock 98,746
 72,185
 51,885
Fair value of vested restricted shares of common stock (in thousands) $1,813
 $1,751
 $1,123

7. Noncontrolling Interest

The Company is structured as an UPREIT, and owns substantially all of its assets and conducts substantially all of its business through its Operating Partnership. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership and their subsidiaries. The table below summarizes the activity for noncontrolling interest in the Company for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012, there were 11,540 and 1,559 forfeitures of shares of restricted common stock, respectively.

8. Noncontrolling Interest

        Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership are interests in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company. As of December 31, 2013, noncontrolling interests consisted of 6,299,186 Common Units and 599,464 LTIP units, which in total represented an approximately 13.35% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2012, noncontrolling interests consisted of 5,743,958 Common Units and 413,551 LTIP units, which in total represented an approximately 14.71% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. 2015.

 LTIP Units 
Other
Common Units
 
Total
Noncontrolling Common Units
 Noncontrolling Interest
Balance at December 31, 20141,307,036
 1,124,813
 2,431,849
 3.6%
Granted/Issued323,069
 864,283
 1,187,352
 N/A
Forfeitures
 
 
 N/A
Conversions from LTIP units to Other Common Units(20,000) 20,000
 
 N/A
Redemptions from Other Common Units to common stock
 (90,824) (90,824) N/A
Redemption of Other Common Units for cash
 (2,400) (2,400) N/A
Balance at December 31, 20151,610,105
 1,915,872
 3,525,977
 4.9%
Granted/Issued176,396
 
 176,396
 N/A
Forfeitures
 
 
 N/A
Conversions from LTIP units to Other Common Units(209,985) 209,985
 
 N/A
Redemptions from Other Common Units to common stock
 (68,492) (68,492) N/A
Balance at December 31, 20161,576,516
 2,057,365
 3,633,881
 4.3%

The Company adjusts the carrying value of noncontrolling interest to reflect its share of the book value of the Operating Partnership when there has been a change in the Company'sCompany’s ownership of the Operating Partnership. Such adjustments are recorded to additional paid-in capital as a rebalancing of noncontrolling interest on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Equity.

Common


F-38

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


LTIP Units

        The


LTIP units are granted to certain executive officers and senior employees of the Company as part of their compensation, and to independent directors for their service. LTIP units are valued by reference to the value of the Company’s common stock and are subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation committee of the board of directors may determine, including continued employment or service. LTIP units granted on January 6, 2016 to independent directors, subject to the recipient’s continued service, will vest on January 1, 2017. LTIP units granted on January 8, 2016 to certain senior executive officers and senior employees, subject to the recipient’s continued employment, will vest quarterly over four years, with the first vesting date being March 31, 2016. LTIP units granted on February 22, 2016 to certain senior executive officers, subject to the recipient’s continued employment, will vest quarterly over four years, with the first vesting date being March 31, 2016. Refer to Note 14 for details on the LTIP units granted on January 6, 2017.Vested LTIP units can be converted to Other Common Units issuedon a one-for-one basis once a material equity transaction has occurred that results in the accretion of the member’s capital account to the economic equivalent of an Other Common Unit. All LTIP units, whether vested or not, will receive the same monthly per unit distributions as Other Common Units, which equal per share dividends on common stock. 

On January 25, 2016, the Company and Geoffrey G. Jervis, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, agreed that Mr. Jervis’s employment with the Company would terminate effective February 25, 2016. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the executive employment agreement and LTIP unit agreements between the Company and Mr. Jervis, and the Company’s 2015 Outperformance Program ("OPP"), Mr. Jervis received a lump sum cash payment, the continuation of certain insurance benefits, immediate vesting of outstanding LTIP units, and eligibility to receive a pro-rated award payment under the OPP. Accordingly, the Company accelerated the expense recognition of Mr. Jervis's unvested LTIP units in the amount of approximately $1.6 million, which is included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, the unrecognized compensation expense associated with Mr. Jervis's participation in the OPP after February 25, 2016 will not be recognized. The Company also incurred approximately $1.5 million related to the lump sum cash payment and continuation of certain insurance benefits, which is included in general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2016 on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On May 4, 2015, the Company and the Operating Partnership and Benjamin S. Butcher, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, entered into an amended and restated employment agreement.  The amended and restated agreement is for an initial term of three years. The agreement automatically extends for successive one year terms unless, not fewer than 60 days before the term’s end, either party provides a notice of non-renewal to the other party. In connection with the amended and restated agreement, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted Mr. Butcher a retention award of 100,000 LTIP units that vest one-half on the third anniversary of the grant and one-sixth on the fourth, fifth and sixth anniversaries.

On September 8, 2014, the Company executed an employment agreement, effective October 27, 2014, with Jeffrey M. Sullivan to serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary for a term of three years commencing on January 1, 2015.  During the period October 27, 2014 to December 31, 2014, Mr. Sullivan acted as a special legal advisor to the Company.  On October 27, 2014, pursuant to the 2011 Plan, the Company awarded an initial LTIP unit grant equal in value to approximately $0.1 million, which equated to 4,006 LTIP units that will vest over five years in equal installments on a quarterly basis beginning on December 31, 2014.  Additionally on October 27, 2014, pursuant to the 2011 Plan, Mr. Sullivan was granted LTIP units equal in value to $0.6 million, which equated to 26,596 LTIP units, which will vest at the end of the initial term of the employment agreement on December 31, 2017. 
On September 8, 2014, Kathryn Arnone, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, informed the board of directors of her decision to resign from the Company effective December 31, 2014. On December 15, 2014, Ms. Arnone informed the board of directors that she was resigning immediately. In connection with her resignation, and pursuant to the terms of the LTIP unit agreements (which terms provide for acceleration of vesting in the case of employment termination due to illness), her outstanding unvested LTIP units vested immediately upon her resignation. The Company accelerated the expense recognition of Ms. Arnone’s unvested LTIP units in the amount of approximately $0.9 million, which is included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On May 12, 2014, the Company executed an employment agreement with Geoffrey G. Jervis to serve as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer for a term of three years.  On July 1, 2014, pursuant to the 2011 Plan, the Company awarded an initial LTIP unit grant equal in value to approximately $0.3 million, which equated to 14,850 LTIP units that will vest over five years in equal installments on a quarterly basis beginning on September 30, 2014.  Additionally on July 1,

F-39

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


2014, pursuant to the 2011 Plan, Mr. Jervis was granted LTIP units equal in value to $1.2 million, which equated to 52,106 LTIP units, which will vest at the end of a three years term, running concurrently with the initial term of the employment agreement, which ends on June 30, 2017. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company and Mr. Jervis agreed that Mr. Jervis’s employment with the Company would terminate effective February 25, 2016; as discussed above.
On February 7, 2014, Gregory W. Sullivan, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, notified the Company of his intention not to renew his contract at its expiration on April 20, 2014 and he tendered his resignation from his position on April 21, 2014.  On April 21, 2014, Mr. Sullivan and the Company executed a consulting agreement, which had an effective date of April 29, 2014, pursuant to which Mr. Sullivan would act as a senior financial advisor to the Company for one year.  The consulting agreement modified the vesting terms of Mr. Sullivan’s LTIP units previously granted to him as well as the vesting provisions of his share of the Company’s 2011 Outperformance Program (“2011 OPP”) (refer to Note 12 for further details on the 2011 OPP) that was measured on September 19, 2014.  At the time of Mr. Sullivan’s contract expiration, he had 82,804 unvested LTIP units and a 14% allocation of the Formation Transactions2011 OPP. The modification to the terms of Mr. Sullivan’s LTIP units and his share of the previously unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 OPP were considered a Type III modification, with non-substantive services, in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, his unvested LTIP units and his share of the previously unrecognized compensation expense associated with 2011 OPP were valued on the effective date of the consulting agreement for approximately $2.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and these amounts were expensed upon the effective date of the consulting agreement and included in general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2014 on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.  The Company expensed dividends in the amount of approximately $0.1 million previously paid to Mr. Sullivan on the unvested LTIP units and this amount is also included in general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2014 on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.  Additionally the Company incurred approximately $0.7 million of general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2014 related to his salary, bonus and other benefits that will be received over the term of the consulting agreement.

The LTIP units issued under the 2011 Plan were valued using the Monte Carlo lattice binomial option-pricing model at the grant date. The fair value of the LTIP units are based on Level 3 inputs and are non-recurring fair value measurements. The table below sets forth the assumptions used in valuing such LTIP units for an issuance pricethe years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
LTIP Units Assumptions
Grant date February 22, 2016 January 8, 2016 January 6, 2016 May 4, 2015 January 12, 2015 October 27, 2014 July 1, 2014 January 2, 2014
Expected term (years) 10
 10
 10
 10
 10
 10
 10
 10
Expected volatility 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20% 40% 40%
Expected dividend yield 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0%
Risk-free interest rate 1.01% 1.28% 1.36% 0.66% 0.62% 0.48% 0.79% 0.79%
Fair value of LTIP units at issuance (in thousands) $277
 $2,254
 $390
 $2,038
 $5,450
 $690
 $1,542
 $4,329
LTIP units at issuance 18,386
 135,546
 22,464
 100,000
 223,069
 30,602
 66,956
 224,424
Fair value unit price per LTIP unit at issuance $15.07
 $16.63
 $17.36
 $20.38
 $24.43
 $22.56
 $23.03
 $19.29

The following table summarizes activity related to the Company’s unvested LTIP units for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Unvested LTIP UnitsLTIP Units
Balance at December 31, 2014448,887
Granted323,069
Vested(237,046)
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2015534,910
Granted176,396
Vested(307,883)
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2016403,423

The unrecognized compensation expense associated with the Company’s LTIP units at December 31, 2016 was approximately $6.6 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of $13.00 perapproximately 2.5 years.


F-40

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The following table summarizes the fair value at vesting date for the LTIP units vested during years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014.
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Vested LTIP units307,883
 237,046
 639,445
Fair value of vested LTIP units (in thousands)$6,393
 $4,853
 $14,063

Other Common Unit.Units

Other Common Units and shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock have essentially the same economic characteristics in that Other Common Units directly, and shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock indirectly, through the Company’s interest in the Operating Partnership, share equally in the total net income or loss distributions of the Operating Partnership. InvestorsSubject to certain restrictions, investors who own Other Common Units have the right to cause the Operating Partnership to redeem any or all of their Other Common Units for cash equal to the then-current market value of one share of the Company'sCompany’s common stock, or, at the Company'sCompany’s election, shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis. AllThe value of a share of common stock is calculated as the average common stock closing price on the NYSE for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the redemption notice date. Each Other Common UnitsUnit will receive the same monthly distribution as the pera share dividends onof common stock. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 2,186 and 1,861,831 Common Units were redeemed

As partial consideration for a property acquired on a one-for-one basis for shares of common stock, respectively.

        On June 15, 2012,January 22, 2015, the Company acquired six industrial properties for which it paid an acquisition fee in the form of 15,789granted 812,676 Other Common Units in the Operating Partnership with a fair value of approximately $0.2$21.9 million which is included in property acquisition costsbased on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The issuance of the Common Units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

8. Noncontrolling Interest (Continued)

amended. The Company reliedCompany’s NYSE closing stock price on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the Common Units.

January 22, 2015. As partial consideration for eight buildingsanother property acquired on June 19, 2013,December 11, 2015, the Company granted 555,75851,607 Other Common Units in the Operating Partnership with a fair value of approximately $11.5$1.0 million based on the Company'sCompany’s NYSE closing stock price on June 19, 2013.December 11, 2015. The number of Other Common Units granted was calculated based on the trailing 10-day average common stock closing price ending on the business day that immediately preceded the grant date. The fair value of the shares of the Other Common Units granted was calculated based on the closing stock price per the NYSE on the grant date multiplied by the number of Other Common Units granted. The issuance of the Other Common Units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company relied on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the Other Common Units.

LTIP Units

        Pursuant to the 2011 Plan, the Company may grant LTIP units in the Operating Partnership. LTIP units, which the Company grants either as free-standing awards or together with other awards under the 2011 Plan, are valued by reference to the value of the Company's common stock, and are subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation committee may determine, including continued employment or service, computation of financial metrics and achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives. Vested LTIP units can be converted to Common Units in the Operating Partnership on a one-for-one basis once a material equity transaction has occurred that results in the accretion of the member's capital account to the economic equivalent of the Common Unit. As of December 31, 2013, all of the outstanding LTIP units have met the aforementioned criteria and holders have the ability to convert the LTIP units to Common Units. All LTIP units, whether vested or not, will receive the same monthly per unit distributions as Common Units, which equal per share dividends on common stock.

        Concurrently with the closing of the IPO, pursuant to the 2011 Plan, the Company granted a total of 159,046 LTIP units to certain executive officers pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements and a total of 41,395 LTIP units to its non-employee independent directors. These LTIP units vest quarterly over five years, with the first vesting date having commenced on June 30, 2011. On January 3, 2012, the Company granted a total of 196,260 LTIP units to certain executive officers and 22,380 LTIP units to its non-employee, independent directors pursuant to the 2011 Plan. The fair value of the LTIP units was approximately $2.3 million and $2.5 million at the April 20, 2011 and January 3, 2012 grant dates, respectively, which was determined by a lattice binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation using a volatility factor of 55% and 50%, a risk-free interest rate of 2.10% and 3.40%, an expected annual dividend yield of 6.0% and 6.5% and terms of 10 years, respectively.

        On January 3, 2013, the Company granted a total of 173,044 LTIP units to certain executive officers and 14,525 LTIP units to its non-employee, independent directors pursuant to the 2011 Plan. The fair value of the LTIP units was approximately $3.3 million, which was determined by a lattice binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation using a volatility factor of 45%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.97%, an expected annual dividend yield of 6.0% and a term of 10 years.

        During the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, 119,852, 82,440 and 30,066 LTIP units vested with fair values of $2.4 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2013, 1,656 LTIP units were redeemed for Common Units. During the year ended December 31, 2013, there were no forfeitures of LTIP units. On May 7, 2012, the Company's non-employee director, Edward F. Lange, did


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

8. Noncontrolling Interest (Continued)

not stand for re-election. Consequently, he forfeited 10,875 unvested LTIP units and the Company expensed the dividends previously paid to Mr. Lange on the unvested LTIP units in the amount of $8 thousand. On July 17, 2012, the Board of Directors elected Christopher P. Marr to serve as a director of the Company, Chairman of the Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Company's Compensation Committee, effective August 2, 2012. On August 2, 2012 the Company granted Mr. Marr 5,345 LTIP units with a fair value of $0.1 million.

        The Company recognized $1.6 million, $0.9 million in non-cash compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012, and $0.3 million for the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011. The Company recognized zero non-cash compensation expense for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011. Unrecognized compensation expense was $5.2 million, $3.5 million and $2.0 million related to the LTIP units at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and is included in additional paid-in capital on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Equity.

9. Future Minimum Rents

        The Company's properties are leased to tenants under triple net, modified, and gross leases. Minimum lease payments receivable, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses, under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2013 are approximately as follows (in thousands):

2014

 $134,391 

2015

  121,243 

2016

  106,356 

2017

  85,455 

2018

  66,355 

Thereafter

  211,117 

        No single tenant represented more than 10% of the Company's total rental income for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, the periods from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011.

10. Earnings Per Share

        A participating security is defined by GAAP as an unvested stock-based payment award containing non-forfeitable rights to dividends and must be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities as these stock-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends irrespective of whether the awards ultimately vest or expire. During the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, there were 218,934, 155,488 and 80,809, respectively, unvested shares of restricted stock on a weighted average basis that were considered participating securities, which were not dilutive. For purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share, awards under the 2011 Outperformance Program (the "OPP") (to be discussed in Note 14) are considered contingently issuable shares. Because the OPP awards require the Company to outperform absolute and relative return thresholds, unless such thresholds have been met by the end of the applicable reporting period, the Company excludes the awards from the basic and diluted earnings


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

10. Earnings Per Share (Continued)

per share calculation. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the absolute and relative return thresholds were met; however, the OPP awards have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2011, the absolute and relative return thresholds were not met. In no event will the 2011 OPP awards be earned and paid out unless the absolute and relative prefomance thesholds are met on September 20, 2014

        The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively (in thousands, except share data).

 
 Year ended
December 31, 2013
 

Numerator

    

Net income from continuing operations

 $106 

Less: preferred stock dividends

  9,495 

Less: amount allocable to unvested restricted stockholders

  262 

Less: noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends allocable to continuing operations

  (1,267)
    

Loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders

 $(8,384)
    
    

Income attributable to discontinued operations

 $4,796 

Less: noncontrolling interest allocable to discontinued operations

  647 
    

Income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders

 $4,149 
    
    

Denominator

    

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted

  42,364,125 
    

Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders

 $(0.20)

Income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders

  0.10 
    

Loss per share—basic and diluted

 $(0.10)
    
    

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

10. Earnings Per Share (Continued)


 
 Year ended
December 31, 2012
 

Numerator

    

Net loss from continuing operations

 $(7,817)

Less: preferred stock dividends

  6,210 

Less: amount allocable to unvested restricted stockholders

  122 

Less: noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends allocable to continuing operations

  (3,180)
    

Loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders

 $(10,969)
    
    

Loss attributable to discontinued operations

 $(2,382)

Less: noncontrolling interest allocable to discontinued operations

  (540)
    

Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders

 $(1,842)
    
    

Denominator

    

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted

  25,046,664 
    

Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders

 $(0.44)

Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders

  (0.07)
    

Loss per share—basic and diluted

 $(0.51)
    
    


 
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31, 2011
 

Numerator

    

Net loss from continuing operations

 $(10,510)

Less: preferred stock dividends

  1,018 

Less: Amount allocable to unvested restricted stockholders

   

Less: noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends allocable to continuing operations

  (3,821)
    

Loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders

 $(7,707)
    
    

Income attributable to discontinued operations

 $1,283 

Less: noncontrolling interest allocable to discontinued operations

  425 
    

Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders

 $858 
    
    

Denominator

    

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted

  15,630,910 
    

Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders

 $(0.49)

Income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders

  0.05 
    

Loss per common share—basic and diluted

 $(0.44)
    
    

        Earnings (loss) per share are not presented for the period January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011 as the IPO did not close until April 20, 2011.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

11. Commitments and Contingencies

        The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance subject to deductible requirements. Management believes that the ultimate settlement of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows

        On April 18, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with affiliates of Columbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, Inc. ("Columbus Nova") to source sale leaseback transactions for potential acquisitions by the Company. The agreement called for various fees to be paid to Columbus Nova for its services including acquisition fees and a one-time incentive fee if certain performance thresholds are met. On June 15, 2012, the Company acquired six industrial properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $30.0 million directly from Columbus Nova that are subject to the one-time incentive fee. To the extent the Company has received a 10% internal rate of return on its invested equity on May 31, 2017, Columbus Nova will earn 20% of the returns exceeding the 10% internal rate of return. The returns will be calculated based on distributions from June 15, 2012 through May 31, 2017 and a hypothetical liquidation of the ending value of the properties owned at May 31, 2017 to be valued by third party appraisers. The fee, if any, will be paid in common stock or cash at the Company's discretion and subject to certain conditions. The fair value of the incentive fee will be measured at each balance sheet date and, to the extent there is value in the incentive fee, it will be recognized as a liability. The hypothetical liquidation of the ending value of the properties was determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. The estimated cash flows used are based on the Company plans for the property and views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider items such as market capitalization rates, discount rates, current and future rental rates, estimated operating and capital expenditures, and estimated downtime. These estimates are prepared using known data at comparable Company owned properties as well market data obtained from third party sources such as real estate leasing and brokerage firms. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, the fair value of the incentive fee was zero. The fair value was calculated using the following key Level 3 inputs: discount rate of approximately 9.5%, exit capitalization rate of 9.0%, and market rent and expense growth rates of 1% to 3%.

Ground and Operating Lease Agreements

        The Company is the lessee for five separate ground leases. The Company incurred ground rent expense of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, $0.1 million and $0 for the periods April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, respectively. One ground lease expires in December 2023 and one ground lease expires in April 2048 both with options to extend.

        On October 9, 2012, the Company acquired two adjacent buildings that are subject to one non-cancelable operating ground lease agreement which commenced on May 1, 1994 and has a forty year term expiring April 30, 2034. The ground lease provides for monthly minimum rent and future rent increases. For the year ended December 31, 2013 and the period from October 9, 2012 to December 31, 2012, the Company expensed ground lease payments under this operating lease in the amount of $0.1 million and $33 thousand, respectively. Rent adjustments are every five years on the basis of increases in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") or fair market value pursuant to certain clauses in the lease agreement.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

11. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        On July 31, 2013, the Company acquired one building that is subject to a non-cancelable operating ground lease agreement which commenced on July 1, 2013 and is set to expire on June 30, 2033, with options to extend. The ground lease provides for monthly ground rent and future rent increases. Rent adjustments are every five years on the basis of increases in the CPI pursuant to certain clauses in the lease agreement. The Company incurred rent expense of $20 thousand for the period from July 31, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The terms of the remaining ground lease is discussed further below.

        The Company is also the lessee for three operating leases that expire in May 2014, May 2016 and March 2021, and the Company incurred rent expense of $0.5 million, $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, for the periods April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011, respectively.

        Future minimum rental payments under the terms of the fixed non-cancelable ground leases and operating leases under which the Company is the lessee as of December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

2014(1)

 $1,134 

2015(1)

  1,433 

2016(1)

  1,201 

2017(1)

  1,029 

2018(1)

  1,134 

Thereafter(1)

  9,246 
(1)
Future minimum rent payments do not include estimates of CPI rent changes required by the lease agreements. Therefore, actual minimum rental payments may differ than those presented.

        On October 9, 2012, the Company acquired one building that is subject to a non-cancelable operating ground lease agreement which commenced on October 28, 1996 and is set to expire on December 31, 2038. The ground lease provides for monthly ground rent and future rent increases. Rent adjustments are every five years on the basis of increases in the CPI pursuant to certain clauses in the lease agreement. The tenant in the building is obligated to pay directly to the land owner their obligations under their lease related to the ground lease payments assumed by the tenant. To the extent the tenant fails to make the ground lease payments, the Company would recognize the expense for the obligation. The Company estimates that the ground lease payments, which are the responsibility of the tenant, were approximately $0.1 million and $33 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the period from October 9, 2012 to December 31, 2012. As the future payments are not fixed and payment is the responsibility of the tenant, the amounts were not included in the table above.

12. Concentrations of Credit Risk

        Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants related to the Company's investments or rental operations are engaged in similar business activities, are located in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their inability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected. The Company regularly monitors its tenant base to assess potential concentrations of credit risk. Management believes the current credit risk portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risk. No single tenant accounted for more than 10% of rental income for the years ended


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

12. Concentrations of Credit Risk (Continued)

December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period ended from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011. No tenant accounted for more than 10% of the Predecessor's related income for the period from January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011. Recent developments in the general economy and the global credit markets have had a significant adverse effect on companies in numerous industries. The Company has tenants concentrated in various industries that may be experiencing adverse effects from the current economic conditions and the Company could be adversely affected if such tenants default on their leases. The Company has tenants concentrated in three industries, Automotive, Containers & Packaging, and Industrial Equipment, Component and Metals.

13. Employee Benefit Plans

        Effective April 20, 2011, the Company adopted a 401(k) Defined Contribution Savings Plan (the "Plan") for its employees. Under the Plan, as amended, employees, as defined, are eligible to participate in the Plan after they have completed three months of service. The Company provides a discretionary match of 50% of the employee's contributions annually up to 6.0% of the employee's annual salary. The Company's aggregate matching contribution for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and for the period April 20, 2011 through December 31, 2011was $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $46 thousand, respectively. The Company's contribution is subject to a three-year vesting schedule.

14.8. Equity Incentive Plan


On April 1, 2011, the Company adopted, and the Company'sCompany’s stockholders approved, the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan provides for the issuance of equity-based awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock awards and other awards based on shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock, such as LTIP units in the Operating Partnership, that may be made by the Company directly to the executive officers, directors, employees and other individuals providing bona fide services to or for the Company.


Subject to certain adjustments identified within the 2011 Plan, the aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock that were available for issuance under awards granted was 1,755,187 shares. At their annual meeting on May 6, 2013, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the 2011 Plan that increased the number of shares ofCompany’s common stock that may be awarded under the 2011 Plan by 1,887,274 shares to an aggregate ofis 3,642,461 shares (7.5% of the shares of common stock and common units (including LTIP units) issued and outstanding as of March 27, 2013).shares. Under the 2011 Plan, each LTIP unit awarded will be equivalent to an award of one share of common stock reserved under the 2011 Plan, thereby reducing the number of shares of common stock available for other equity awards on a one-for-one basis.

        Each stock option and stock appreciation right granted under the 2011 Plan will have a term of no longer than 10 years, and will have an exercise price that is no less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant of the award. Stock appreciation rights confer on the participant the right to receive cash, common stock or other property, as determined by the 2011 Plan administrator, equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the stock appreciation right. The other terms of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted by the Company will be determined by the 2011 Plan administrator.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

14. Equity Incentive Plan (Continued)

The 2011 Plan may be terminated, amended, modified or suspended at any time by the board of directors, subject to stockholder approval as required by law or stock exchange rules. The 2011 Plan expires on March 31, 2021.


On September 20, 2011, the compensation committee of the Company'sCompany’s board of directors approved the 2011 OPP under the 2011 Plan to provide key employees of the Company or its affiliates with incentives to contribute to the growth and financial success of the Company. On September 19, 2014, the Company’s three year measurement period pursuant to the 2011 OPP concluded.  It was determined that the Company’s total stockholder return exceeded the threshold percentage and return hurdle and the maximum pool amount of $10.0 million was awarded to the participants. The compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of 397,590 vested LTIP units and 43,657 vested shares of common stock to participants of the 2011 OPP.

On March 8, 2016, the Company granted performance units, approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors, under the 2011 Plan to provide certain key employees of the Company with incentives designed to align those key employees' interests more closely with those of the stockholders.


F-41

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The ultimate value of the performance units depends on the Company’s total stockholder return ("TSR") over a three-year period commencing January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2018 (the "measuring period"). At the end of the measuring period, the performance units convert into shares of common stock, or, at the Company's election and with the award recipient's consent, LTIP units or other securities, at a rate depending on the Company’s TSR over the measuring period as compared to three different benchmarks and on the absolute amount of the Company’s TSR. A recipient of performance units may receive as few as zero shares or as many as 250% of the number of target units, plus deemed dividends. The target amount of the performance units is nominally allocated as: (i) 25% to the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of an industry peer group; (ii) 25% to the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of a size-based peer group; and (iii) 50% to the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of the companies in the MSCI US REIT index.

No dividends are paid to the recipient during the measuring period. At the end of the measuring period, if the Company’s TSR is such that the recipient earns shares of common stock or, at the Company's election and with the award recipient's consent, LTIP units or other securities (“Award Shares”), the recipient will receive additional Award Shares relating to dividends deemed to have been paid and reinvested on the Award Shares. The Company, in the discretion of the compensation committee of the board of directors, may pay the cash value of the deemed dividends instead of issuing additional Award Shares. The number of Award Shares is determined at the end of the measuring period, and one-half of the Award Shares and all dividend shares vest immediately. The other one-half of the Award Shares will be restricted (subject to forfeiture) and vest one year after the end of the measuring period.

The fair value of the performance units at the date of grant was approximately $2.6 million, as determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation using a weighted average volatility factor of 23.0%, a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.0849%, and a weighted average expected dividend yield of 6.0%. The performance unit equity compensation expense is recognized into earnings ratably from the grant date over the respective vesting periods. Refer to Note 14 for details on performance units granted on January 6, 2017.

On January 12, 2015, the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company approved the 2015 Outperformance Program (the “2015 OPP”) under the 2011 Plan, to provide certain key employees of the Company or its affiliates with incentives to contribute to the growth and financial success of the Company. The OPP utilizes total stockholder return over a three-year measurement period as the performance measurement.

Company and its affiliates.


Recipients of awards under the 2015 OPP will share in an outperformance pool if the Company'sCompany’s total stockholder return, including both share appreciation and dividends, exceeds an absolute hurdle over a three-yearthree year measurement period from September 20, 2011January 1, 2015 to September 20, 2014January 1, 2018 (the "measurement period"“measurement period”), based on a beginning value of $12.50$24.49 per share of the Company'sCompany’s common stock, as well as a relative hurdle based on the MSCI US REIT Index. The aggregate reward that all recipients collectively can earn, as measured by the outperformance pool, is capped at $10.0 million.

Provided the Company'sCompany’s increase in cumulative absolute total stockholder return over the three-year measurement period is equal toequals or greater thanexceeds 25% (the "threshold percentage"“threshold percentage”), the outperformance pool will consistconsists of 10% of the excess total stockholder return above a relativean absolute total stockholder return hurdle. The hurdle is equal to the total return of the MSCI US REIT Index plus five percentage points over the measurement period. No awards will be granted


The aggregate reward for all recipients collectively is capped at the lesser of (i) 0.24% of the product of the total number of shares of common stock and Noncontrolling Common Units outstanding on January 1, 2018 and the average common stock price of the Company for the 20 trading days ending immediately prior to January 1, 2018, and (ii) $15.4 million.

Each participant’s award under the OPP if the Company's absolute total stockholder return is below the threshold percentage. If the Company's total stockholder return is equal to or in excess of the threshold percentage and greater than the relative total stockholder return hurdle, then the award recipients will be entitled to the payments described below.

        Each participant's award under the2015 OPP is designated as a specified percentage of the aggregate outperformance pool. AssumingIf the applicable absolutethreshold percentage and relative total stockholder return thresholds arehurdle were achieved at the end of the measurement period, the outperformance pool will be calculated and then allocated amongto the award recipients in accordance with each individual's percentage.recipients. The award2015 OPP provides that awards will be paid in the form of fully vested shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock, unlessor, at the compensation committee elects,Company's election and with the award recipient'srecipient’s consent, to issue the award recipient other securities or to make a cash payment to the award recipient equal to the award recipient's share of the outperformance pool. cash.


The number of shares of common stock earned by each award recipient will be determined at the end of the measurement period by dividing the recipient's share of the outperformance pool by the closing price of the Company's common stock on the valuation date. On September 26, 2011, the compensation committee awarded 100% of the interests in the OPP to key employees of the Company.

        The awards provided to the employees will vest 100% at the end of the measurement period provided that the award recipient is a service provider to the Company. To the extent the employee is terminated without cause, the awards will have vested based on the number of days during the measurement period that they are considered a service provider to the Company.

        The2015 OPP awards were valued at approximately $1.2$1.6 million utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the probability of the performance conditions being satisfied. The Monte Carlo simulation used a statistical formula underlying the Black-Scholes and binomial formulas and such simulation was


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

14. Equity Incentive Plan (Continued)

run approximately 100,000500,000 times. For each simulation, the payoff is calculated at the settlement date, which is then discounted to the award date at a risk-free interest rate. The average of the values over all simulations is the expected value of the award on the award date. Assumptions used in the valuations included (i) factors associated with the underlying performance of the Company'sCompany’s stock price and total stockholder return over the term of the performance awards including total stock return volatility and risk-free interest and (ii) factors associated with the relative performance of the Company'sCompany’s stock price and total stockholder return when compared to the MSCI US REIT Index. The valuation was performed in a risk-neutral framework, so no assumption was made with respect to an equity risk premium. The fair value of the 2015 OPP awards was estimated on the date of grant using the following assumptions in the Monte-Monte Carlo valuation: expected price volatility for the Company and the MSCI


F-42

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


US REIT Index of 55%20% and 59.3%13.6%, respectively, and a risk free rate of 0.3423%0.9814%. The expense associated with the value of the 2015 OPP awards will be amortized on a straight-line basisratably over the measurement period. The Company recognized $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.1 million in compensation expense associated with the OPP during the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively.

        The Company issued 106,268, 87,025 and 80,809 shares of restricted stock and 187,569, 223,985 and 200,441 of LTIP units during the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively. Dividends paid on both vested and unvested shares of restricted stock are charged directly to common stock dividends in excess of earnings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Non-cash compensation expense associated with shares issued to directors, restricted stock, LTIP units, and the OPP was approximately $3.0 million, $1.9 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and the period April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011, respectively.


The unrecognized compensation expense associated with the LTIP units, the restricted stock,2015 OPP and the OPP awards was $5.2 million, $2.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively,performance units at December 31, 20132016 was approximately $0.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.3 years. 1.0 year and 2.4 years, respectively.

Equity Non-cash Compensation Expense

The unrecognized compensation expense associated withfollowing table summarizes the amount recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the amortization of restricted shares of common stock, LTIP units, the restricted stock,2015 OPP, the 2011 OPP, performance units, and the OPP awards was $3.5 million, $1.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, atCompany’s board of directors’ compensation.
  Year ended December 31, 
Non-cash compensation expense (in thousands) 2016    2015 2014 
Restricted stock $2,157
  $1,932
 $1,164
 
LTIP units 6,089
(1) 
4,774
 5,353
(2) 
Outperformance programs 465
 523
 456
(3) 
Performance units 672
 
 
 
Board of directors compensation (4)
 346
 349
 341
 
Total non-cash compensation expense $9,729
 $7,578
 $7,314
 
(1)Inclusive of approximately $1.6 million of non-cash compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2016 associated with the severance cost of an executive officer as discussed Note 7.
(2)Inclusive of approximately $2.0 million of non-cash compensation during the year ended December 31, 2014 associated with the accounting for a consulting agreement with a former executive officer discussed in Note 7. Inclusive of approximately $0.9 million of non-cash compensation during the year ended December 31, 2014 associated with the accounting for a former executive officer's acceleration of LTIP units discussed in Note 7. 
(3)Inclusive of approximately $0.2 million of non-cash compensation during the year ended December 31, 2014 associated with the accounting for a consulting agreement with a former executive officer discussed in Note 7.
(4)All of the Company’s independent directors elected to receive shares of common stock in lieu of cash for their service during the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014. The number of shares of common stock granted is calculated based on the trailing 10 days average common stock price ending on the third business day preceding the grant date.

At December 31, 2012 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.5 years. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012, there were 214,389 and 150,114 of unvested restricted stock and 368,760 and 301,043 of LTIP units outstanding, respectively.

        At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012,2015, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2011 Plan was 2,778,779were 1,156,578 and 1,175,362,1,449,415, respectively. This doesThe number of shares available for issuance under the 2011 Plan do not include an allocation for the performance units or the 2015 OPP as the awards were not determinable as of December 31, 20132016 or December 31, 2015.


9. Earnings Per Share

The Company uses the two-class method of computing earnings per common share, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities as these stock-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, unless and until a forfeiture occurs, and these awards must be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. During the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2012. Additionally,2014, there were 276,367; 280,839; and 268,894, respectively, unvested shares of restricted stock on a weighted average basis that were considered participating securities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were 92,251 and 123,112 of unvested shares of restricted stock and performance units, respectively, on a weighted average basis that were dilutive. There were no dilutive shares during the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were 70,149 and 110,048 shares of unvested restricted common stock on a weighted average basis, respectively, that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been no shares or units issuedantidilutive for those periods.


F-43

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
  Year ended December 31,
Earnings Per Share (in thousands, except share data) 2016 2015 2014
Numerator      
Net income (loss) $35,588
 $(29,345) $(4,685)
Less: preferred stock dividends 13,897
 10,848
 10,848
Less: amount allocated to participating securities 384
 385
 345
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends 1,069
 (1,962) (992)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $20,238
 $(38,616) $(14,886)
Denominator  
    
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic 70,637,185
 66,307,972
 54,086,345
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted 70,852,548
 66,307,972
 54,086,345
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted      
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — basic $0.29
 $(0.58) $(0.28)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — diluted $0.29
 $(0.58) $(0.28)

10. Future Minimum Rents

The Company’s properties are leased to tenants under the OPPtriple net, modified, and gross leases. Minimum contractual lease payments receivable, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses, under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2013.

15. Related-Party Transactions

2016 are approximately as follows.

Year Future Minimum Rents (in thousands)
2017 $223,309
2018 $187,615
2019 $149,273
2020 $120,461
2021 $87,797
Thereafter $301,177

11. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance subject to deductible requirements. Management believes that the ultimate settlement of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On June 6, 2007, STAG Predecessor GroupApril 18, 2012, the Company entered into a loan guaranteean agreement with an affiliateaffiliates of NED CreditColumbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, Inc. ("Columbus Nova") to source sale leaseback transactions for potential acquisitions by the Company. The loan guarantee wasagreement called for various fees to be paid to Columbus Nova for its services including acquisition fees, credit monitoring fees, and a one-time incentive fee if certain performance thresholds are met. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Anglo Irish bridge loan dated August 11, 2006 and amended on June 6, 2007, which was paid in full at the IPO. STAG Predecessor Group agreed to pay the guarantor an annual fee for the guarantor's provisionfair value of the guaranty in an amount equalincentive fee was zero. The fair value was calculated using the following key Level 3 inputs: discount rate of 8.0% to nine percent (9.0%) per annum12.0% and 9.5% as of the outstanding balanceDecember 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and exit capitalization rate of the bridge loan. STAG Predecessor Group expensed $0.97.0% to 12.0% and 9.8% as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The Company has letters of credit of approximately $3.5 million in such guarantee fees, which are included in interest expense on the Consolidatedrelated to development projects and Combined Statementsits corporate office lease as of Operations, for the period January 1, 2011 to

December 31, 2016.


F-44

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

15.



Ground and Operating Lease Agreements

Future minimum rental payments under the terms of the fixed non-cancelable ground leases and operating leases, including any bargain renewal terms, under which the Company is the lessee as of December 31, 2016 are as follows.
Year 
Future Minimum Rental Payments (1)
(in thousands)
2017 $1,427
2018 $1,539
2019 $1,577
2020 $1,588
2021 $681
Thereafter $6,336
(1)Future minimum rental payments do not include estimates of CPI rent changes required by certain lease agreements. Therefore, actual minimum rental payments may differ than those presented.

12. Employee Benefit Plans

Effective April 20, 2011, the Company adopted a 401(k) Defined Contribution Savings Plan (the “Plan”) for its employees. Under the Plan, as amended, employees, as defined, are eligible to participate in the Plan after they have completed three months of service. The Company provides a discretionary match of 50% of the employee’s contributions annually up to 6.0% of the employee’s annual compensation, subject to a cap imposed by federal tax law. The Company’s aggregate matching contribution for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was approximately $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The Company’s contribution is subject to a three year vesting schedule, such that employees who have been with the Company for three years are fully vested in past and future contributions.

13. Related-Party Transactions (Continued)


The Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) on April 19, 2011. Subsequent to20, 2011, represented the Formation Transactions,roll-up of the substantial majority of the assets of several private, externally-advised real estate funds investing in single-tenant industrial real estate in the United States, including the fund identified below as Fund III. The roll-up included the affiliated management companies that advised the funds and excluded the assets of another affiliated real estate fund that also invested in industrial real estate; including the fund identified below as Fund II. In connection with the IPO, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was not responsible for bridge loan guarantee fees.

        Prior to the IPO, STAG Predecessor Group was obligated to pay asset management fees to an affiliate, STAG Capital Partners, LLC (the "Management Company") in consideration of the Management Company's agreement that it provide reasonable and customary advisory and asset management services to STAG Predecessor Group. STAG Predecessor Group expensed $0.2 million in such asset management fees for the period January 1, 2011 to April 19, 2011. Subsequent to the Formation Transactions, the Company no longer incurs asset management fees to the Management Company.

        As part of the Formation Transactions, the Company formed a new management company, STAG Industrial Management, LLC (the "Manager"“Manager”), which is a subsidiary ofentered into service agreements with the Company. funds that participated in the IPO and remained in existence and the fund that did not participate in the IPO.


The Manager is performing certain asset management services for STAG Investments II, LLC ("(“Fund II"II”), a private, fully-invested fund that is an affiliate of the Company and owned 44seven buildings with approximately 7.42.2 million rentable square feet as of December 31, 2013.2016. The Manager is paid an annual asset management fee based on the equity investment in the Fund II assets, which is 1.25% of the equity investment. In June 2013, Fund II and the Company amended the Service Agreementservice agreement to exclude disposition services from the asset management services to be performed by the Company and results in a concomitant reduction in the asset management fee. The Company recognized asset management fee income of $0.8approximately $0.2 million, $1.1$0.4 million and $0.9$0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013,2016, December 31, 20122015 and for the period from April 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011,2014, respectively, which is included in other income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had a receivable in the amount of $0.2approximately $48,000 and $0.1 million, and $0.5 millionrespectively, related to the asset management fee income included within due from related partiesprepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, which was subsequently received on February 7, 2014 and January 17, 2013, respectively.

        While most of the real estate assets of Fund III comprise the assets of theSheets.


The Company’s “predecessor” for accounting purposes is STAG Predecessor Group, which is not a legal entity, but a collection of real estate entities that were owned by STAG Investments III, LLC (“Fund III”) prior to the Company’s IPO. At the time of the formation transactions in connection with the IPO, three vacant properties owned by Fund III retained ownership ofwere not contributed to the Option Properties.Company (the “Option Properties”). The Manager had entered into a services agreement with Fund III pursuant to which it would manage the Option Properties for an annual fee of $30 thousand$30,000 per property, and would provide the limited administrative services (including preparation of reports for the Fund III lender and investors, bookkeeping, tax and accounting services) that Fund III will require, for an annual fee of $20 thousand.$20,000. As the last remaining Option Property was sold in 2013, the Manager will only receivereceived the annual fee of $20 thousand$20,000 until Fund III'sIII’s liquidation.

        STAG Investments IV, LLC ("Fund IV"), as part of the STAG Contribution Group, contributed all of its real estate assets to the Company. The Manager had entered into a services agreement with Fund IV pursuant to which it would provide the limited administrative services (including preparation of reports for the Fund IV investors, bookkeeping, taxIII ceased operations and accounting services) that Fund IV would require until its liquidation for an annual fee of $20 thousand. Fund IV was liquidated on September 10, 2012December 31, 2014 and, as a result, the Manager no longer receives an annual fee.

        On October 9, 2012, the Company acquired 31 industrial properties representing 4.3 million square feet for a purchase price of $127.6 million from STAG Investments Holdings II, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fund II, which are related parties of the Company through common management. A special committee of independent members of the Board was formed to address conflicts arising from the common management. The special committee engaged its independent counsel and broker to



F-45

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

15. Related-Party Transactions (Continued)

manage the acquisition. On October 31, 2012, the Company acquired one additional industrial property from the Fund for a purchase price of $5.0 million. On April 5, 2013, the Company acquired an additional industrial property from the Fund for the purchase price of $6.2 million. The acquisitions were funded using draws from the Unsecured Credit Facility. The Manager and its predecessor, the Management Company, served as the asset manager of Fund II for all periods presented. At December 31, 2012, the due from related parties on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets included $0.2 million due from the Fund related to a true-up of final settlement statement pro-rations, and the amount was subsequently received on February 27, 2013.

16. Selected Interim Financial Information (unaudited)

        The tables below reflect the Company's selected quarterly information for the quarters ended December 31, 2013, September 30, 2013, June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, March 31, 2012.


 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. 
 
 Quarter ended
December 31,
2013
 Quarter ended
September 30,
2013
 Quarter ended
June 30,
2013
 Quarter ended
March 31,
2013
 

Total revenue

 $37,418 $34,644 $31,842 $29,988 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $1,126 $265 $(738)$(547)

Net income (loss) attributable to the common stockholders

 $2,098 $(2,147)$(2,410)$(1,775)

Income (loss) per share—basic and diluted

 $0.05 $(0.05)$(0.06)$(0.04)


 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. 
 
 Quarter ended
December 31,
2012
 Quarter ended
September 30,
2012
 Quarter ended
June 30,
2012
 Quarter ended
March 31,
2012
 

Total revenue

 $26,877 $20,878 $19,116 $17,181 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(2,973)$(1,371)$(2,028)$(1,445)

Net income (loss) attributable to the common stockholders

 $(3,372)$(5,262)$(2,235)$(1,942)

Income (loss) per share—basic and diluted

 $(0.10)$(0.18)$(0.11)$(0.12)

        Total revenue and income (loss) from continuing operations presented in the tables above will not agree to previously filed financial statements on Forms 10-Q due to the reclassification of amounts from continuing operations to discontinued operations for property sales. Refer to Note 3 for the details of properties sold.

17.14. Subsequent Events


GAAP requires an entity to disclose certain events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued ("(“subsequent events"events”) as well as the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.. There are two types of subsequent events. The first type consists of events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements ("(“recognized subsequent events"events”). No significant recognized subsequent events

were noted.

Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Continued)

17. Subsequent Events (Continued)

were noted.

The second type consists of events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose subsequent to that date ("(“non-recognized subsequent events"events”).

The following non-recognized subsequent events are noted:

noted.


On January 1, 2014, Virgis W. Colbert's appointment to the board of directors became effective.

        On January 2, 2014,6, 2017, the Company granted a total of 203,691 LTIP units to certain senior executive officers, 20,733 LTIP units to non-employee, independent directors, and 103,14975,001 restricted shares of common stock to certain employees of the Company pursuant to the 2011 Plan.

The restricted shares of common stock granted will vest in four equal installments on January 1 of each year beginning in 2018. The fair value of the restricted shares of common stock at the date of grant was $24.41 per share.


On February 7, 2014, Gregory W. Sullivan, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, notifiedJanuary 6, 2017, the Company that hegranted 16,836 LTIP units to non-employee, independent directors, and 109,403 LTIP units to certain executive officers and senior employees pursuant to the 2011 Plan. The LTIP units granted to non-employee, independent directors will vest on January 1, 2018. The LTIP units granted to certain executive officers and senior employees will vest quarterly over four years, with the first vesting date being March 31, 2017. The fair value of the LTIP units at the date of grant was not renewing his employment contract at it expirationapproximately $2.9 million, as determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on April 20, 2014a Monte Carlo simulation using an expected term of ten years, a weighted average volatility factor of 23.0%, a weighted average expected dividend yield of 6.0%, and that he resigned froma weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.61%. The fair value of the LTIP units are based on Level 3 inputs and are non-recurring fair value measurements.

On January 6, 2017, the Company effective April 21, 2014.granted performance units to certain executive officers and senior employees pursuant to the 2011 Plan. The Company intends to engage Mr. Sullivan as a senior financial advisor for one year to ensure a smooth transitionterms of the chief financial officer.

January 6, 2017 performance units grant is substantially the same as the March 8, 2016 performance units grant as discussed in Note 8, except that the measuring period commences on January 1, 2017 and ends on December 31, 2019. The fair value of the performance units at the date of grant was approximately $2.9 million, as determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation using a weighted average volatility factor of 23.0%, a weighted average expected dividend yield of 6.0%, and a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.61%. The fair value of the performance units are based on Level 3 inputs and are non-recurring fair value measurements.

Table of Contents

STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group
Schedule 2—II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
December 31, 2013
2016
(in thousands)

Allowance for Doubtful Receivables and
Accrued Rent Reserves

 
 STAG Industrial, Inc. 
 
 Beginning
of Period
 Costs and
Expenses
 Amounts
Written Off
 Balance at
End of Period
 

12/31/2013

 $ $19 $ $19 
          

12/31/2012

 $931 $(105)$(826)$ 
          
 STAG Industrial, Inc.
 Beginning of Period Costs and Expenses Amounts Written Off Balance at End of Period
December 31, 2016$106
 $125
 $(43) $188
December 31, 2015$104
 $190
 $(188) $106
December 31, 2014$19
 $104
 $(19) $104

Table of Contents

STAG Industrial, Inc.
Schedule 3—III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2013
2016
(in thousands)

   Initial Cost to STAG Industrial, Inc.   Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2016   
City/State
 Encumbrances(1) Building and
Tenant
Improvements
(initial cost)
 Land Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
and
Valuation
Provision
 Building
Improvements
and
Equipment
 Land Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 Acq Date Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
  
Encumbrances (1)
 
Building & Improvements (2)
 Land Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition and Valuation Provision Building & Improvements Land Total 
Accumulated Depreciation (3)
 Acq Date

Albion, IN

  93 67  93 67 160 (17) 2006 (2) $
 93
 67
 $
 $93
 $67
 $160
 $(24) 2006

Albion, IN

  932 103  932 103 1,035 (169) 2006 (2) 
 932
 103
 
 932
 $103
 $1,035
 (246) 2006

Albion, IN

  1,107 55  1,107 55 1,162 (201) 2006 (2) 
 1,107
 55
 
 1,107
 $55
 $1,162
 (292) 2006

Albion, IN

  970 332  970 332 1,302 (176) 2006 (2) 
 970
 332
 
 970
 $332
 $1,302
 (256) 2006

Albion, IN

  1,397 52  1,397 52 1,449 (253) 2006 (2) 
 1,397
 52
 
 1,397
 $52
 $1,449
 (368) 2006

Albion, IN

  1,528 126  1,528 126 1,654 (277) 2006 (2) 
 1,528
 126
 
 1,528
 $126
 $1,654
 (403) 2006

Kendallville, IN

  1,510 142  1,510 142 1,652 (273) 2006 (2) 
 1,510
 142
 
 1,510
 $142
 $1,652
 (398) 2006

Albion, IN

  710 187  710 187 897 (129) 2006 (2) 
 710
 187
 
 710
 $187
 $897
 (187) 2006

Alexandria, MN

  4,568 960 151 4,719 960 5,679 (398) 2011 (2) 
 5,855
 960
 151
 6,006
 $960
 $6,966
 (900) 2011
Allentown, PA 
 7,336
 1,962
 783
 8,119
 $1,962
 $10,081
 (865) 2014

Appleton, WI

  3,916 495 191 4,107 495 4,602 (693) 2007 (2) 
 3,765
 495
 360
 4,125
 $495
 $4,620
 (1,030) 2007

Arlington, TX

  2,455 413 (45) 2,410 413 2,823 (394) 2007 (2) 
 2,374
 413
 304
 2,678
 $413
 $3,091
 (589) 2007

Arlington, TX

  6,151 1,246  6,151 1,246 7,397 (289) 2012 (2) 
 6,151
 1,246
 
 6,151
 $1,246
 $7,397
 (837) 2012

Atlanta, GA

  7,437 917 298 7,735 917 8,652 (318) 2012 (2)

Auburn Hills, MI

  2,246 224 (4) 2,242 224 2,466 (77) 2012 (2)

Avon, CT

  2,750 336  2,750 336 3,086 (127) 2012 (2) 
 2,750
 336
 
 2,750
 $336
 $3,086
 (369) 2012

Belfast, ME

  10,728 1,883 383 11,111 1,883 12,994 (921) 2011 (2) 
 10,331
 1,883
 487
 10,818
 $1,883
 $12,701
 (1,641) 2011

Bellevue, OH

  3,621 381  3,621 381 4,002 (181) 2012 (2)

Belvidere, IL

  3,956 733  3,956 733 4,689 (78) 2013 (2) 
 4,176
 442
 
 4,176
 $442
 $4,618
 (224) 2015

Belvidere, IL

  3,436 1,310  3,436 1,310 4,746 (91) 2013 (2) 
 3,956
 733
 
 3,956
 $733
 $4,689
 (428) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  2,310 538  2,310 538 2,848 (51) 2013 (2) 
 3,436
 1,310
 
 3,436
 $1,310
 $4,746
 (514) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  6,899 670  6,899 670 7,569 (116) 2013 (2) 
 3,517
 538
 114
 3,631
 $538
 $4,169
 (325) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  4,321 668  4,321 668 4,989 (91) 2013 (2) 
 6,899
 670
 
 6,899
 $670
 $7,569
 (690) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  3,730 866  3,730 866 4,596 (73) 2013 (2) 
 4,321
 668
 
 4,321
 $668
 $4,989
 (493) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  2,808 586  2,808 586 3,394 (67) 2013 (2) 
 3,730
 866
 
 3,730
 $866
 $4,596
 (450) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  8,340 1,542  8,340 1,542 9,882 (192) 2013 (2) 
 2,808
 586
 22
 2,830
 $586
 $3,416
 (375) 2013

Belvidere, IL

  71 216  71 216 287 (12) 2013 (2) 
 8,340
 1,542
 552
 8,892
 $1,542
 $10,434
 (1,043) 2013
Belvidere, IL 
 71
 216
 
 71
 $216
 $287
 (71) 2013
Biddeford, ME 
 8,164
 1,369
 3,916
 12,080
 $1,369
 $13,449
 (179) 2016

Boardman, OH

  3,482 282 593 4,075 282 4,357 (648) 2007 (2) 
 3,473
 282
 773
 4,246
 $282
 $4,528
 (1,033) 2007

Boardman, OH

  1,979 192 359 2,338 192 2,530 (329) 2007 (2) 
 841
 49
 149
 990
 $49
 $1,039
 (531) 2007
Brooklyn Park, MN 
 11,988
 1,926
 
 11,988
 $1,926
 $13,914
 (33) 2016

Buena Vista, VA

  2,500 534  2,500 534 3,034 (114) 2012 (2) 
 2,500
 534
 635
 3,135
 $534
 $3,669
 (417) 2012

Buffalo, NY

  2,924 146  2,924 146 3,070 (129) 2012 (2) 
 2,924
 146
 
 2,924
 $146
 $3,070
 (373) 2012

Canton, OH

  5,078 586 128 5,206 586 5,792 (981) 2007 (2)
Burlington, NJ 
 42,652
 5,135
 55
 42,707
 $5,135
 $47,842
 (1,980) 2015
Burlington, NJ 
 19,577
 4,030
 1,231
 20,808
 $4,030
 $24,838
 (1,268) 2015
Calhoun, GA 
 2,764
 388
 
 2,764
 $388
 $3,152
 (216) 2014
Camarillo, CA 
 10,785
 7,242
 237
 11,022
 $7,242
 $18,264
 (943) 2014
Camarillo, CA 
 19,857
 7,989
 25
 19,882
 $7,989
 $27,871
 (1,589) 2014

Catoosa, OK

  3,937   3,937  3,937 (64) 2013 (2) 
 3,937
 
 
 3,937
 $
 $3,937
 (450) 2013
Cedar Hill, TX 
 11,971
 4,066
 
 11,971
 $4,066
 $16,037
 (222) 2016

Charlotte, NC

 (12,541) 10,239 3,535 525 10,764 3,535 14,299 (994) 2011 (2) (10,291) 9,461
 3,535
 1,197
 10,658
 $3,535
 $14,193
 (2,199) 2011

Charlotte, NC

 (15,830) 12,818 2,734 161 12,979 2,734 15,713 (1,277) 2011 (2) 
 2,443
 805
 4
 2,447
 $805
 $3,252
 (244) 2014
Charlotte, NC 
 3,554
 386
 19
 3,573
 $386
 $3,959
 (341) 2014
Charlotte, NC 
 3,961
 515
 
 3,961
 $515
 $4,476
 (157) 2015
Charlotte, NC 
 4,445
 678
 
 4,445
 $678
 $5,123
 (112) 2016
Chattanooga, TN 
 2,321
 187
 
 2,321
 $187
 $2,508
 (155) 2015
Chattanooga, TN 
 4,730
 380
 13
 4,743
 $380
 $5,123
 (316) 2015
Chattanooga, TN 
 8,459
 424
 
 8,459
 $424
 $8,883
 (645) 2015

Cheektowaga, NY

  2,757 216 395 3,152 216 3,368 (293) 2011 (2) 
 2,757
 216
 793
 3,550
 $216
 $3,766
 (599) 2011

Chesterfield, MI

  1,169 207 62 1,231 207 1,438 (301) 2007 (2) 
 1,169
 207
 62
 1,231
 $207
 $1,438
 (390) 2007

Chesterfield, MI

  798 150 15 813 150 963 (133) 2007 (2) 
 798
 150
 89
 887
 $150
 $1,037
 (206) 2007

Chesterfield, MI

  802 151 131 933 151 1,084 (154) 2007 (2) 
 802
 151
 224
 1,026
 $151
 $1,177
 (261) 2007

Chesterfield, MI

  5,304 942 972 6,276 942 7,218 (1,293) 2007 (2) 
 5,304
 942
 1,952
 7,256
 $942
 $8,198
 (1,821) 2007
Chester, VA 
 3,402
 775
 
 3,402
 $775
 $4,177
 (448) 2014

Chicopee, MA

  5,867 504  5,867 504 6,371 (243) 2012 (2) 
 5,867
 504
 
 5,867
 $504
 $6,371
 (825) 2012

Chippewa Falls, WI

  2,303 133  2,303 133 2,436 (142) 2011 (2)

Chippewa Falls, WI

  544 44  544 44 588 (33) 2011 (2)

Cincinnati, OH

  5,172 384 1,751 6,923 384 7,307 (1,142) 2007 (2)

Cleveland, TN

 (2,964) 3,161 554 84 3,245 554 3,799 (260) 2011 (2)

West Columbia, SC

  6,988 715 102 7,090 715 7,805 (179) 2013 (2)

Conyers, GA

 (3,928) 4,142 969 80 4,222 969 5,191 (331) 2011 (2)

Dallas, GA

  1,712 475  1,712 475 2,187 (78) 2012 (2)

LaGrange, GA

  3,175 240 41 3,216 240 3,456 (354) 2011 (2)

Danville, KY

  11,814 965 997 12,811 965 13,776 (1,122) 2011 (2)

Daytona Beach, FL

  875 1,237 740 1,615 1,237 2,852 (315) 2007 (2)

Dayton, OH

  3,650 391 624 4,274 391 4,665 (510) 2007 (2)

DeKalb, IL

  4,568 489  4,568 489 5,057 (115) 2013 (2)

De Pere, WI

  6,144 525  6,144 525 6,669 (265) 2012 (2)

Duncan, SC

  11,352 1,002 44 11,396 1,002 12,398 (519) 2012 (2)

Duncan, SC

  6,928 709  6,928 709 7,637 (359) 2012 (2)

Edgefield, SC

  938 220  938 220 1,158 (52) 2012 (2)

Elkhart, IN

  210 25 14 224 25 249 (45) 2007 (2)

Elkhart, IN

  3,567 422 161 3,728 422 4,150 (628) 2007 (2)

El Paso, TX

  3,096  373 3,469  3,469 (137) 2012 (2)

East Windsor, CT

 (3,360) 4,713 348 447 5,160 348 5,508 (403) 2012 (2)

Lexington, VA

  445 59  445 59 504 (77) 2007 (2)

Fairfield, VA

  2,274 295 177 2,451 295 2,746 (463) 2007 (2)

Farmington, NY

  5,342 410 12 5,354 410 5,764 (908) 2007 (2)

Franklin, IN

  12,042 2,479  12,042 2,479 14,521 (713) 2012 (2)

Table of Contents

City/State
 Encumbrances(1) Building and
Tenant
Improvements
(initial cost)
 Land Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
and
Valuation
Provision
 Building
Improvements
and
Equipment
 Land Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 Acq Date Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 

Fort Worth, TX

  (2,271) 2,965  389    2,965  389  3,354  (257) 2011  (2)

Gahanna, OH

  (3,649) 4,191  1,265  1,158  5,349  1,265  6,614  (365) 2011  (2)

Georgetown, KY

  (2,437) 2,183  875    2,183  875  3,058  (199) 2011  (2)

Gloversville, NY

  (813) 1,317  117  (18) 1,299  117  1,416  (50) 2012  (2)

Gloversville, NY

  (1,314) 2,613  151    2,613  151  2,764  (123) 2012  (2)

Gloversville, NY

  (1,189) 1,790  130    1,790  130  1,920  (97) 2012  (2)

Gloversville, NY

  (939) 1,514  154    1,514  154  1,668  (70) 2012  (2)

Golden, CO

    6,164  742    6,164  742  6,906  (154) 2013  (2)

Goshen, IN

  (6,366) 6,509  1,442  201  6,710  1,442  8,152  (566) 2011  (2)

Greenwood, SC

  (1,689) 1,848  166    1,848  166  2,014  (75) 2012  (2)

Greenwood, SC

  (1,439) 1,232  169    1,232  169  1,401  (58) 2012  (2)

Gresham, OR

  (9,241) 8,740  1,730  365  9,105  1,730  10,835  (715) 2011  (2)

Gurnee, IL

    4,902  1,337    4,902  1,337  6,239  (312) 2012  (2)

Hampstead, MD

    34,969  780    34,969  780  35,749  (438) 2013  (2)

Harrisonburg, VA

    11,179  1,455    11,179  1,455  12,634  (355) 2012  (2)

Harvard, IL

    2,980  1,157    2,980  1,157  4,137  (17) 2013  (2)

St. Louis, MO

  (6,432) 5,815  1,382    5,815  1,382  7,197  (582) 2011  (2)

Holland, MI

    5,235  489  428  5,663  489  6,152  (969) 2007  (2)

Holland, MI

  (3,492) 3,475  279  60  3,535  279  3,814  (166) 2012  (2)

Holland, MI

    4,046  497  (218) 3,828  497  4,325  (592) 2007  (2)

Houston, TX

    7,790  2,255    7,790  2,255  10,045  (177) 2013  (2)

Huntersville, NC

    3,270  1,061  35  3,305  1,061  4,366  (170) 2012  (2)

Idaho Falls, ID

    2,735  356    2,735  356  3,091  (82) 2013  (2)

Independence, VA

  (1,571) 2,212  226    2,212  226  2,438  (153) 2012  (2)

Jackson, MS

    926  218    926  218  1,144  (161) 2007  (2)

Jackson, MS

    3,142  750  565  3,707  750  4,457  (612) 2007  (2)

Jackson, TN

    2,374  230  142  2,516  230  2,746  (88) 2012  (2)

Janesville, WI

    17,493  828    17,493  828  18,321  (59) 2013  (2)

Jefferson, NC

    2,875  119    2,875  119  2,994  (482) 2007  (2)

Johnstown, NY

  (813) 1,304  178    1,304  178  1,482  (54) 2012  (2)

Johnstown, NY

  (1,189) 1,595  216  (3) 1,592  216  1,808  (54) 2012  (2)

Johnstown, NY

  (970) 978  198    978  198  1,176  (54) 2012  (2)

Johnstown, NY

  (1,815) 1,467  140    1,467  140  1,607  (61) 2012  (2)

Kansas City, MO

    5,581  703    5,581  703  6,284  (168) 2012  (2)

Kansas City, KS

  (1,283) 1,125  527    1,125  527  1,652  (62) 2012  (2)

Kentwood, MI

    2,478  407    2,478  407  2,885  (55) 2013  (2)

Lafayette, IN

  (1,345) 2,280  295  (47) 2,233  295  2,528  (78) 2012  (2)

Lafayette, IN

  (2,284) 3,554  410    3,554  410  3,964  (221) 2012  (2)

Lafayette, IN

  (4,693) 8,135  906  26  8,161  906  9,067  (427) 2012  (2)

Lansing, MI

  (8,735) 8,164  501    8,164  501  8,665  (637) 2011  (2)

Lansing, MI

    4,077  580    4,077  580  4,657  (214) 2012  (2)

Lansing, MI

  (6,257) 7,162  429    7,162  429  7,591  (275) 2012  (2)

Lansing, MI

    5,209  907    5,209  907  6,116  (17) 2013  (2)

Lewiston, ME

    5,515  173  360  5,875  173  6,048  (1,057) 2007  (2)

Lexington, NC

    3,968  232  135  4,103  232  4,335  (340) 2011  (2)

Londonderry, NH

    6,683  730    6,683  730  7,413  (167) 2013  (2)

Louisville, KY

  (3,508) 3,875  386  520  4,395  386  4,781  (380) 2011  (2)

Louisville, KY

  (5,596) 6,182  616  632  6,814  616  7,430  (590) 2011  (2)

Madison, TN

  (6,844) 6,159  1,655  892  7,051  1,655  8,706  (737) 2011  (2)

Malden, MA

    2,817  366    2,817  366  3,183  (475) 2007  (2)

Malden, MA

    3,961  507    3,961  507  4,468  (668) 2007  (2)

Marion, IA

    2,257  691  46  2,303  691  2,994  (68) 2013  (2)

Marion, IN

  (3,191) 3,010  243    3,010  243  3,253  (169) 2012  (2)

Marshall, MI

    1,051  199    1,051  199  1,250  (36) 2013  (2)

Mascot, TN

    3,452  385    3,452  385  3,837  (14) 2013  (2)

Salem, OH

    6,849  858    6,849  858  7,707  (1,127) 2006  (2)

Mayville, WI

    4,118  547  330  4,448  547  4,995  (742) 2007  (2)

Mebane, NC

    4,570  481    4,570  481  5,051  (174) 2012  (2)

Mebane, NC

    4,148  443    4,148  443  4,591  (169) 2012  (2)

Mebane, NC

    4,999  358    4,999  358  5,357  (31) 2013  (2)

Milwaukee, WI

    4,090  456    4,090  456  4,546  (663) 2007  (2)

Milwaukee, WI

    5,283  1,048  368  5,651  1,048  6,699  (1,125) 2007  (2)

Mishawaka, IN

    3,108  800  24  3,132  800  3,932  (92) 2013  (2)

Montgomery, IL

    12,543  2,190  62  12,605  2,190  14,795  (424) 2012  (2)

Mooresville, NC

  (7,085) 7,411  701  216  7,627  701  8,328  (625) 2011  (2)

Mt. Prospect, IL

    2,988  726    2,988  726  3,714  (77) 2013  (2)

Nashville, TN

    3,601  547    3,601  547  4,148  (56) 2013  (2)

Newark, DE

    1,478  197  137  1,615  197  1,812  (333) 2007  (2)

Newark, DE

    2,479  330  36  2,515  330  2,845  (431) 2007  (2)

New Berlin, WI

    6,500  1,068  98  6,598  1,068  7,666  (102) 2013  (2)

New Hope, MN

    1,970  1,919    1,970  1,919  3,889  (34) 2013  (2)

Lopatcong, NJ

    1,400  1,554  184  1,584  1,554  3,138  (228) 2011  (2)

Piscataway, NJ

    5,655  640  164  5,819  640  6,459  (698) 2011  (2)

Newton, NC

    4,367  732  86  4,453  732  5,185  (542) 2011  (2)
    Initial Cost to STAG Industrial, Inc.   Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2016    
City/State 
Encumbrances (1)
 
Building & Improvements (2)
 Land Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition and Valuation Provision Building & Improvements Land Total 
Accumulated Depreciation (3)
 Acq Date
Chippewa Falls, WI 
 2,303
 133
 
 2,303
 $133
 $2,436
 (347) 2011
Chippewa Falls, WI 
 544
 44
 
 544
 44
 588
 (80) 2011
Cincinnati, OH 
 3,637
 238
 1,412
 5,049
 238
 5,287
 (1,785) 2007
Cleveland, TN (2,464) 3,161
 554
 84
 3,245
 554
 3,799
 (543) 2011
Clinton, TN 
 3,302
 403
 
 3,302
 403
 3,705
 (307) 2015
Columbus, OH 
 3,123
 489
 167
 3,290
 489
 3,779
 (433) 2014
Columbia, SC 
 5,171
 783
 
 5,171
 783
 5,954
 (122) 2016
West Columbia, SC 
 6,988
 715
 401
 7,389
 715
 8,104
 (792) 2013
Dallas, GA 
 1,712
 475
 
 1,712
 475
 2,187
 (252) 2012
LaGrange, GA 
 3,175
 240
 331
 3,506
 240
 3,746
 (619) 2011
Danville, KY 
 11,814
 965
 3,644
 15,458
 965
 16,423
 (2,273) 2011
Daytona Beach, FL 
 875
 1,237
 1,704
 2,579
 1,237
 3,816
 (630) 2007
Dayton, OH 
 5,896
 331
 375
 6,271
 331
 6,602
 (319) 2015
DeForest, WI 
 5,402
 1,131
 
 5,402
 1,131
 6,533
 (20) 2016
DeKalb, IL 
 4,568
 489
 
 4,568
 489
 5,057
 (530) 2013
De Pere, WI 
 6,144
 525
 
 6,144
 525
 6,669
 (861) 2012
Duncan, SC 
 11,258
 1,002
 726
 11,984
 1,002
 12,986
 (1,635) 2012
Duncan, SC 
 6,739
 709
 71
 6,810
 709
 7,519
 (833) 2012
Durham, SC 
 2,700
 753
 31
 2,731
 753
 3,484
 (161) 2015
Earth City, MO 
 2,806
 1,123
 
 2,806
 1,123
 3,929
 (25) 2016
Edgefield, SC 
 938
 220
 750
 1,688
 220
 1,908
 (255) 2012
Elizabethtown, PA 
 5,363
 1,000
 
 5,363
 1,000
 6,363
 (414) 2014
Elkhart, IN 
 210
 25
 143
 353
 25
 378
 (58) 2007
Elkhart, IN 
 3,567
 422
 452
 4,019
 422
 4,441
 (931) 2007
El Paso, TX 
 9,099
 1,248
 
 9,099
 1,248
 10,347
 (733) 2014
El Paso, TX 
 7,905
 1,124
 
 7,905
 1,124
 9,029
 (767) 2014
El Paso, TX 
 14,159
 1,854
 91
 14,250
 1,854
 16,104
 (1,205) 2014
El Paso, TX 
 9,897
 1,581
 
 9,897
 1,581
 11,478
 (767) 2014
El Paso, TX 
 5,893
 1,136
 
 5,893
 1,136
 7,029
 (340) 2015
El Paso, TX 
 3,096
 
 1,006
 4,102
 
 4,102
 (567) 2012
Erlanger, KY 
 3,826
 635
 6
 3,832
 635
 4,467
 (132) 2016
East Troy, WI 
 4,962
 304
 
 4,962
 304
 5,266
 (382) 2014
East Windsor, CT 
 5,711
 400
 
 5,711
 400
 6,111
 (22) 2016
East Windsor, CT (3,073) 4,713
 348
 528
 5,241
 348
 5,589
 (1,088) 2012
Fairborn, OH 
 5,650
 867
 
 5,650
 867
 6,517
 (477) 2015
Fairfield, OH 
 2,842
 948
 
 2,842
 948
 3,790
 (142) 2016
Farmington, NY 
 5,342
 410
 20
 5,362
 410
 5,772
 (1,312) 2007
Forest Park, GA 
 9,527
 1,733
 35
 9,562
 1,733
 11,295
 (142) 2016
Forest Park, GA 
 8,189
 1,715
 
 8,189
 1,715
 9,904
 (106) 2016
Fort Wayne, IN 
 3,142
 112
 
 3,142
 112
 3,254
 (245) 2014
Franklin, IN 
 12,042
 2,479
 13
 12,055
 2,479
 14,534
 (1,940) 2012
Fort Worth, TX (1,889) 2,965
 389
 709
 3,674
 389
 4,063
 (563) 2011
Gahanna, OH 
 4,191
 1,265
 1,258
 5,449
 1,265
 6,714
 (1,055) 2011
Gardiner, ME 
 8,983
 948
 
 8,983
 948
 9,931
 (141) 2016
Garland, TX 
 5,425
 1,344
 294
 5,719
 1,344
 7,063
 (644) 2014
Garland, TX 
 6,058
 1,542
 536
 6,594
 1,542
 8,136
 (296) 2015
Germantown, WI 
 6,035
 1,186
 
 6,035
 1,186
 7,221
 (660) 2014
Gloversville, NY (736) 1,299
 117
 
 1,299
 117
 1,416
 (169) 2012
Gloversville, NY (1,189) 2,613
 151
 
 2,613
 151
 2,764
 (359) 2012
Gloversville, NY (849) 1,514
 154
 13
 1,527
 154
 1,681
 (220) 2012
Golden, CO 
 6,164
 742
 67
 6,231
 742
 6,973
 (669) 2013
Goshen, IN (5,224) 6,509
 1,442
 415
 6,924
 1,442
 8,366
 (1,186) 2011
Grand Junction, CO 
 4,002
 314
 
 4,002
 314
 4,316
 (196) 2015
Grand Rapids, MI 
 7,532
 169
 5
 7,537
 169
 7,706
 (383) 2015
Graniteville, SC 
 8,389
 1,629
 
 8,389
 1,629
 10,018
 (228) 2016
Greenwood, SC (1,529) 1,848
 166
 
 1,848
 166
 2,014
 (236) 2012
Greenwood, SC (1,302) 1,232
 169
 4
 1,236
 169
 1,405
 (198) 2012
Greenville, SC 
 3,379
 309
 
 3,379
 309
 3,688
 (220) 2015
Greer, SC 
 1,434
 129
 144
 1,578
 129
 1,707
 (78) 2015

Table of Contents

City/State
 Encumbrances(1) Building and
Tenant
Improvements
(initial cost)
 Land Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
and
Valuation
Provision
 Building
Improvements
and
Equipment
 Land Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 Acq Date Depreciable
Lives
(Years)
 

North Jackson, OH

    4,427  1,528    4,427  1,528  5,955  (25) 2013  (2)

North Jackson, OH

  (7,775) 6,439  486    6,439  486  6,925  (591) 2011  (2)

Norton, MA

  (5,834) 6,740  2,839    6,740  2,839  9,579  (532) 2011  (2)

Novi, MI

  (3,066) 3,879  252    3,879  252  4,131  (198) 2012  (2)

Ocala, FL

    13,296  731    13,296  731  14,027  (295) 2013  (2)

O'Fallon, MO

  (3,210) 2,676  1,242  69  2,745  1,242  3,987  (239) 2011  (2)

O'Hara, PA

  (17,583) 18,875  1,435  574  19,449  1,435  20,884  (787) 2012  (2)

Orangeburg, SC

    2,653  362    2,653  362  3,015  (100) 2013  (2)

Orlando, FL

    4,839  1,339    4,839  1,339  6,178  (45) 2013  (2)

Orlando, FL

    1,996  721    1,996  721  2,717  (101) 2012  (2)

Parsons, KS

  (1,189) 1,053  108    1,053  108  1,161  (50) 2012  (2)

Pensacola, FL

    4,705  282  68  4,773  282  5,055  (807) 2007  (2)

Pensacola, FL

    206  42  83  289  42  331  (51) 2007  (2)

Phenix City, AL

  (1,752) 1,493  276    1,493  276  1,769  (85) 2012  (2)

Pineville, NC

    1,380  392    1,380  392  1,772  (79) 2012  (2)

Warrendale, PA

    6,437  778  430  6,867  778  7,645  (536) 2011  (2)

Pocatello, ID

    3,472  399  135  3,607  399  4,006  (785) 2007  (2)

Portage, IN

    5,416      5,416    5,416  (180) 2012  (2)

Portland, TN

    8,353  1,662    8,353  1,662  10,015  (526) 2012  (2)

Portland, ME

  (3,120) 3,727  891    3,727  891  4,618  (192) 2012  (2)

Rapid City, SD

    11,957  2,306  524  12,481  2,306  14,787  (2,724) 2007  (2)

Muhlenberg TWP, PA

    14,064  843  13  14,077  843  14,920  (706) 2012  (2)

Rogers, MN

  (12,050) 11,787  1,671  238  12,025  1,671  13,696  (1,429) 2011  (2)

Rogers, AR

    8,280  1,072  99  8,379  1,072  9,451  (569) 2011  (2)

Round Rock, TX

    3,399  394  (54) 3,345  394  3,739  (551) 2007  (2)

Rural Hall, NC

    5,664  439  137  5,801  439  6,240  (677) 2011  (2)

Salem, OR

  (3,340) 3,150  599  161  3,311  599  3,910  (312) 2011  (2)

Salem, OR

  (1,501) 1,471  266  119  1,590  266  1,856  (209) 2011  (2)

Sauk Village, IL

    5,516  877    5,516  877  6,393  (21) 2013  (2)

Sergeant Bluff, IA

    11,675  736  36  11,711  736  12,447  (2,886) 2007  (2)

Seville, OH

    6,662  1,170  229  6,891  1,170  8,061  (538) 2011  (2)

Shannon, GA

    12,969  393    12,969  393  13,362  (61) 2013  (2)

South Holland, IL

    3,900  714    3,900  714  4,614  (18) 2013  (2)

Simpsonville, SC

    3,003  957  30  3,033  957  3,990  (158) 2012  (2)

Simpsonville, SC

    3,418  470    3,418  470  3,888  (161) 2012  (2)

Smithfield, NC

    4,671  613    4,671  613  5,284  (295) 2011  (2)

Smyrna, GA

    3,286  264    3,286  264  3,550  (129) 2012  (2)

South Bend, IN

    4,834  411    4,834  411  5,245  (253) 2012  (2)

Southfield, MI

    4,196  562    4,196  562  4,758  (103) 2013  (2)

Southfield, MI

      354      354  354    2013  (2)

Sparks, MD

    3,577  790  (146) 3,431  790  4,221  (536) 2007  (2)

Spartanburg, SC

    6,471  493    6,471  493  6,964  (591) 2012  (2)

Springfield, OH

    6,432  574    6,432  574  7,006  (76) 2013  (2)

Statham, GA

    6,242  588    6,242  588  6,830  (236) 2012  (2)

Sterling Heights, MI

  (1,689) 4,197  513  55  4,252  513  4,765  (153) 2012  (2)

Hazelwood, MO

    5,436  1,959  455  5,891  1,959  7,850  (935) 2006  (2)

Streetsboro, OH

  (6,694) 5,481  2,161  214  5,695  2,161  7,856  (796) 2011  (2)

Sun Prairie, WI

    6,176  2,360  (76) 6,100  2,360  8,460  (431) 2011  (2)

Tavares, FL

    6,339  722    6,339  722  7,061  (1,386) 2006  (2)

Toledo, OH

    6,831  213    6,831  213  7,044  (259) 2012  (2)

Twinsburg, OH

    6,497  590    6,497  590  7,087  (1,014) 2007  (2)

Vonore, TN

  (9,392) 8,243  2,355  85  8,328  2,355  10,683  (916) 2011  (2)

Waco, TX

    1,448    30  1,478    1,478  (107) 2011  (2)

Walker, MI

  (4,434) 4,872  855  118  4,990  855  5,845  (452) 2011  (2)

Ware Shoals, SC

  (282) 197  133    197  133  330  (10) 2012  (2)

Wichita, KS

  (1,689) 1,835  88    1,835  88  1,923  (82) 2012  (2)

Wichita, KS

  (1,846) 1,931  107    1,931  107  2,038  (135) 2012  (2)

Wichita, KS

  (939) 904  140    904  140  1,044  (42) 2012  (2)

Wichita, KS

  (845) 869  76    869  76  945  (59) 2012  (2)

Williamsport, PA

    9,059  688    9,059  688  9,747  (209) 2013  (2)

Woodstock, IL

    3,796  496    3,796  496  4,292  (138) 2012  (2)

Bardstown, KY

    2,399  381    2,399  381  2,780  (424) 2007  (2)

Total

  (225,303)(1) 924,075  134,399  20,572  944,647  134,399  1,079,046  (71,653)      

(1)
Balance excludes the unamortized balance of historical fair value adjustments of $288.

(2)
Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives:
    Initial Cost to STAG Industrial, Inc.   Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2016    
City/State 
Encumbrances (1)
 
Building & Improvements (2)
 Land Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition and Valuation Provision Building & Improvements Land Total 
Accumulated Depreciation (3)
 Acq Date
Greer, SC 
 1,748
 128
 39
 1,787
 128
 1,915
 (95) 2015
Greer, SC 
 471
 153
 10
 481
 153
 634
 (31) 2015
Greer, SC 
 3,016
 306
 99
 3,115
 306
 3,421
 (180) 2015
Fountain Inn, SC 
 4,438
 719
 
 4,438
 719
 5,157
 (152) 2016
Grove City, OH 
 3,974
 730
 
 3,974
 730
 4,704
 (60) 2016
Gurnee, IL 
 11,380
 1,716
 19
 11,399
 1,716
 13,115
 (845) 2014
Gurnee, IL 
 4,902
 1,337
 468
 5,370
 1,337
 6,707
 (935) 2012
Hampstead, MD 
 34,969
 780
 
 34,969
 780
 35,749
 (3,588) 2013
Harrisonburg, VA 
 11,179
 1,455
 144
 11,323
 1,455
 12,778
 (1,285) 2012
Hartland, WI 
 4,634
 1,526
 
 4,634
 1,526
 6,160
 (36) 2016
Harvard, IL 
 2,980
 1,157
 
 2,980
 1,157
 4,137
 (637) 2013
Hazelwood, MO (5,384) 5,815
 1,382
 1,207
 7,022
 1,382
 8,404
 (1,292) 2011
Hebron, KY 
 4,601
 370
 
 4,601
 370
 4,971
 (446) 2014
Holland, MI (3,159) 3,475
 279
 60
 3,535
 279
 3,814
 (580) 2012
Holland, MI 
 2,176
 224
 229
 2,405
 224
 2,629
 (925) 2007
Houston, TX 
 7,790
 2,255
 9
 7,799
 2,255
 10,054
 (886) 2013
Houston, TX 
 4,906
 1,428
 17
 4,923
 1,428
 6,351
 (594) 2014
Houston, TX 
 5,019
 565
 750
 5,769
 565
 6,334
 (671) 2014
Houston, TX 
 8,448
 2,546
 
 8,448
 2,546
 10,994
 (53) 2016
Huntersville, NC 
 3,123
 1,061
 39
 3,162
 1,061
 4,223
 (390) 2012
Idaho Falls, ID 
 2,735
 356
 
 2,735
 356
 3,091
 (380) 2013
Independence, VA (1,421) 2,212
 226
 83
 2,295
 226
 2,521
 (415) 2012
Itasca, IL 
 12,216
 2,428
 
 12,216
 2,428
 14,644
 (95) 2016
Jackson, TN 
 2,374
 230
 213
 2,587
 230
 2,817
 (374) 2012
Janesville, WI 
 17,477
 828
 245
 17,722
 828
 18,550
 (2,115) 2013
Jefferson City, TN 
 8,494
 1,350
 
 8,494
 1,350
 9,844
 (1,365) 2014
Johnstown, NY (736) 1,304
 178
 
 1,304
 178
 1,482
 (184) 2012
Johnstown, NY (1,076) 1,592
 216
 
 1,592
 216
 1,808
 (185) 2012
Johnstown, NY (878) 978
 151
 
 978
 151
 1,129
 (171) 2012
Johnstown, NY (1,642) 1,467
 140
 
 1,467
 140
 1,607
 (208) 2012
Kansas City, MO 
 5,539
 703
 92
 5,631
 703
 6,334
 (584) 2012
Kenosha, WI 
 3,991
 797
 
 3,991
 797
 4,788
 (36) 2016
Kentwood, MI 
 2,478
 407
 
 2,478
 407
 2,885
 (309) 2013
Knoxville, TN 
 3,201
 447
 
 3,201
 447
 3,648
 (263) 2015
Lafayette, IN (1,217) 2,205
 295
 36
 2,241
 295
 2,536
 (267) 2012
Lafayette, IN (2,067) 3,554
 410
 38
 3,592
 410
 4,002
 (540) 2012
Lafayette, IN (4,246) 8,135
 906
 252
 8,387
 906
 9,293
 (1,182) 2012
Lancaster, PA 
 5,480
 1,520
 
 5,480
 1,520
 7,000
 (527) 2015
Langhorne, PA 
 3,868
 1,370
 
 3,868
 1,370
 5,238
 (86) 2016
Langhorne, PA 
 3,105
 1,308
 
 3,105
 1,308
 4,413
 (84) 2016
Langhorne, PA 
 6,372
 1,884
 
 6,372
 1,884
 8,256
 (61) 2016
Lansing, MI (7,263) 8,164
 501
 
 8,164
 501
 8,665
 (1,353) 2011
Lansing, MI 
 4,077
 580
 
 4,077
 580
 4,657
 (564) 2012
Lansing, MI (5,662) 7,162
 429
 
 7,162
 429
 7,591
 (936) 2012
Lansing, MI 
 5,209
 907
 
 5,209
 907
 6,116
 (619) 2013
Laurens, SC 
 4,254
 151
 
 4,254
 151
 4,405
 (181) 2015
Lenexa, KS 
 7,610
 2,368
 
 7,610
 2,368
 9,978
 (938) 2014
Lewiston, ME 
 5,515
 173
 1,318
 6,833
 173
 7,006
 (1,769) 2007
Lexington, NC 
 3,968
 232
 633
 4,601
 232
 4,833
 (717) 2011
Libertyville, IL 
 6,455
 421
 80
 6,535
 421
 6,956
 (377) 2015
Libertyville, IL 
 770
 143
 9
 779
 143
 922
 (155) 2015
Londonderry, NH 
 6,683
 730
 
 6,683
 730
 7,413
 (767) 2013
Longmont, CO 
 9,647
 1,529
 350
 9,997
 1,529
 11,526
 (859) 2014
Loudon, TN 
 3,751
 170
 
 3,751
 170
 3,921
 (181) 2015
Louisville, KY (3,354) 3,875
 386
 520
 4,395
 386
 4,781
 (866) 2011
Louisville, KY (5,351) 6,182
 616
 632
 6,814
 616
 7,430
 (1,336) 2011
Macedonia, OH 
 8,195
 1,690
 10
 8,205
 1,690
 9,895
 (487) 2015
Machesney Park, IL 
 3,742
 300
 
 3,742
 300
 4,042
 (261) 2015
Madison, TN (5,688) 6,159
 1,655
 1,681
 7,840
 1,655
 9,495
 (1,488) 2011


    Initial Cost to STAG Industrial, Inc.   Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2016    
City/State 
Encumbrances (1)
 
Building & Improvements (2)
 Land Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition and Valuation Provision Building & Improvements Land Total 
Accumulated Depreciation (3)
 Acq Date
Malden, MA 
 2,817
 366
 
 2,817
 366
 3,183
 (691) 2007
Malden, MA 
 3,961
 507
 
 3,961
 507
 4,468
 (972) 2007
Marion, IA 
 2,257
 691
 49
 2,306
 691
 2,997
 (338) 2013
Marion, IN (2,887) 2,934
 243
 563
 3,497
 243
 3,740
 (391) 2012
Marshall, MI 
 1,051
 199
 
 1,051
 199
 1,250
 (181) 2013
Mascot, TN 
 3,228
 284
 
 3,228
 284
 3,512
 (178) 2016
Mascot, TN 
 3,452
 385
 65
 3,517
 385
 3,902
 (525) 2013
Salem, OH 
 7,674
 858
 252
 7,926
 858
 8,784
 (1,761) 2006
Mason, OH 
 4,730
 673
 
 4,730
 673
 5,403
 (476) 2014
Mayville, WI 
 4,118
 547
 330
 4,448
 547
 4,995
 (1,142) 2007
Mebane, NC 
 4,570
 481
 457
 5,027
 481
 5,508
 (596) 2012
Mebane, NC 
 4,148
 443
 
 4,148
 443
 4,591
 (548) 2012
Mebane, NC 
 4,999
 358
 
 4,999
 358
 5,357
 (577) 2013
Mechanicsburg, PA 
 5,172
 1,482
 635
 5,807
 1,482
 7,289
 (648) 2014
Mechanicsburg, PA 
 7,144
 1,800
 
 7,144
 1,800
 8,944
 (654) 2014
New Kingston, PA 
 8,687
 2,041
 
 8,687
 2,041
 10,728
 (786) 2014
Mechanicsburg, PA 
 8,008
 1,452
 
 8,008
 1,452
 9,460
 (719) 2014
Milwaukee, WI 
 4,090
 456
 46
 4,136
 456
 4,592
 (978) 2007
Montgomery, AL 
 7,523
 418
 
 7,523
 418
 7,941
 (25) 2016
Montgomery, IL 
 12,485
 2,190
 1,755
 14,240
 2,190
 16,430
 (1,573) 2012
Mooresville, NC (5,888) 7,411
 701
 216
 7,627
 701
 8,328
 (1,312) 2011
Mountain Home, NC 
 2,472
 523
 
 2,472
 523
 2,995
 (230) 2014
Murfreesboro, TN 
 2,863
 722
 
 2,863
 722
 3,585
 (338) 2014
Nashua, NH 
 8,682
 1,431
 
 8,682
 1,431
 10,113
 (942) 2014
Nashville, TN 
 3,601
 547
 
 3,601
 547
 4,148
 (391) 2013
Newark, DE 
 1,478
 197
 392
 1,870
 197
 2,067
 (480) 2007
Newark, DE 
 1,891
 232
 194
 2,085
 232
 2,317
 (612) 2007
New Berlin, WI 
 6,500
 1,068
 141
 6,641
 1,068
 7,709
 (886) 2013
New Castle, DE 
 17,767
 2,616
 
 17,767
 2,616
 20,383
 (338) 2016
New Hope, MN 
 1,970
 1,919
 
 1,970
 1,919
 3,889
 (345) 2013
Lopatcong, NJ 
 9,154
 1,554
 193
 9,347
 1,554
 10,901
 (476) 2011
Piscataway, NJ 
 5,655
 640
 620
 6,275
 640
 6,915
 (1,480) 2011
Newton, NC 
 3,814
 732
 86
 3,900
 732
 4,632
 (573) 2011
North Haven, CT 
 39,911
 4,086
 1,384
 41,295
 4,086
 45,381
 (3,132) 2015
North Jackson, OH 
 4,427
 1,528
 
 4,427
 1,528
 5,955
 (469) 2013
North Jackson, OH (7,435) 5,795
 486
 170
 5,965
 486
 6,451
 (734) 2011
Norcorss, GA 
 2,586
 1,589
 
 2,586
 1,589
 4,175
 (132) 2016
Norton, MA 
 6,740
 2,839
 
 6,740
 2,839
 9,579
 (1,192) 2011
Novi, MI (2,774) 3,879
 252
 
 3,879
 252
 4,131
 (659) 2012
Novi, MI 
 6,035
 626
 
 6,035
 626
 6,661
 (310) 2015
Oakwood Village, OH 
 3,091
 343
 
 3,091
 343
 3,434
 (254) 2015
Ocala, FL 
 13,296
 731
 952
 14,248
 731
 14,979
 (1,409) 2013
O'Fallon, MO (2,634) 2,676
 1,242
 266
 2,942
 1,242
 4,184
 (500) 2011
O'Hara, PA (15,909) 18,875
 1,435
 4,999
 23,874
 1,435
 25,309
 (3,036) 2012
Oklahoma City, OK 
 2,211
 746
 
 2,211
 746
 2,957
 (23) 2016
Oklahoma City, OK 
 9,199
 1,614
 1,354
 10,553
 1,614
 12,167
 (488) 2015
Olathe, KS 
 20,763
 2,431
 
 20,763
 2,431
 23,194
 (195) 2016
Orlando, FL 
 4,839
 1,339
 
 4,839
 1,339
 6,178
 (588) 2013
Orlando, FL 
 1,996
 721
 
 1,996
 721
 2,717
 (292) 2012
Pensacola, FL 
 2,989
 145
 111
 3,100
 145
 3,245
 (1,215) 2007
Phenix City, AL (1,585) 1,493
 276
 140
 1,633
 276
 1,909
 (249) 2012
Phoenix, AZ 
 5,770
 1,653
 
 5,770
 1,653
 7,423
 (340) 2015
Piedmont, SC 
 4,152
 231
 
 4,152
 231
 4,383
 (216) 2015
Piedmont, SC 
 2,127
 158
 
 2,127
 158
 2,285
 (115) 2015
Piedmont, SC 
 2,302
 204
 
 2,302
 204
 2,506
 (195) 2015
Pineville, NC 
 1,380
 392
 
 1,380
 392
 1,772
 (227) 2012
Plymouth, MI 
 4,670
 365
 
 4,670
 365
 5,035
 (339) 2015
Pocatello, ID 
 3,472
 399
 135
 3,607
 399
 4,006
 (1,064) 2007
Portage, IN 
 5,416
 
 
 5,416
 
 5,416
 (613) 2012

    Initial Cost to STAG Industrial, Inc.   Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2016    
City/State 
Encumbrances (1)
 
Building & Improvements (2)
 Land Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition and Valuation Provision Building & Improvements Land Total 
Accumulated Depreciation (3)
 Acq Date
Portland, TN 
 8,353
 1,662
 66
 8,419
 1,662
 10,081
 (1,387) 2012
Portland, ME (2,853) 3,727
 891
 
 3,727
 891
 4,618
 (507) 2012
Rapid City, SD 
 10,662
 2,071
 836
 11,498
 2,071
 13,569
 (3,477) 2007
Reading, PA 
 5,401
 1,708
 67
 5,468
 1,708
 7,176
 (176) 2016
Muhlenberg TWP, PA 
 14,064
 843
 132
 14,196
 843
 15,039
 (1,982) 2012
Reno, NV 
 3,461
 1,372
 
 3,461
 1,372
 4,833
 (357) 2014
Rock Hill, SC (4,012) 6,297
 1,411
 
 6,297
 1,411
 7,708
 (114) 2016
Rogers, MN (10,014) 11,787
 1,671
 238
 12,025
 1,671
 13,696
 (2,925) 2011
Rogers, AR 
 8,280
 1,072
 99
 8,379
 1,072
 9,451
 (1,391) 2011
Rural Hall, NC 
 5,664
 439
 147
 5,811
 439
 6,250
 (1,103) 2011
Salem, OR (2,741) 3,150
 599
 640
 3,790
 599
 4,389
 (603) 2011
Salem, OR (1,231) 1,452
 266
 433
 1,885
 266
 2,151
 (340) 2011
San Antonio, TX 
 10,395
 1,568
 
 10,395
 1,568
 11,963
 (61) 2016
Sauk Village, IL 
 5,405
 877
 64
 5,469
 877
 6,346
 (621) 2013
Savage, MN 
 3,996
 3,194
 493
 4,489
 3,194
 7,683
 (662) 2014
Savannah, GA 
 13,219
 439
 
 13,219
 439
 13,658
 (1,193) 2014
Sergeant Bluff, IA 
 6,188
 247
 273
 6,461
 247
 6,708
 (3,667) 2007
Seville, OH 
 4,536
 766
 171
 4,707
 766
 5,473
 (949) 2011
Shannon, GA 
 12,969
 393
 
 12,969
 393
 13,362
 (1,150) 2013
South Holland, IL 
 3,900
 714
 
 3,900
 714
 4,614
 (652) 2013
Shreveport, LA 
 6,265
 1,804
 136
 6,401
 1,804
 8,205
 (460) 2015
Simpsonville, SC 
 2,960
 957
 117
 3,077
 957
 4,034
 (442) 2012
Simpsonville, SC 
 3,418
 470
 127
 3,545
 470
 4,015
 (462) 2012
Smithfield, NC 
 4,694
 613
 12
 4,706
 613
 5,319
 (706) 2011
Smyrna, GA 
 3,286
 264
 
 3,286
 264
 3,550
 (485) 2012
South Bend, IN 
 4,834
 411
 
 4,834
 411
 5,245
 (666) 2012
Sparks, MD 
 1,945
 358
 65
 2,010
 358
 2,368
 (751) 2007
Spartanburg, SC 
 15,100
 1,867
 
 15,100
 1,867
 16,967
 (122) 2016
Spartanburg, SC 
 3,694
 342
 
 3,694
 342
 4,036
 (370) 2014
Spartanburg, SC 
 5,797
 493
 294
 6,091
 493
 6,584
 (728) 2012
Springfield, OH 
 6,432
 574
 
 6,432
 574
 7,006
 (745) 2013
Statham, GA 
 6,130
 588
 200
 6,330
 588
 6,918
 (747) 2012
Sterling Heights, MI (1,529) 4,197
 513
 415
 4,612
 513
 5,125
 (548) 2012
Stoughton, MA 
 2,613
 2,256
 824
 3,437
 2,256
 5,693
 (606) 2015
Stoughton, MA 
 1,216
 538
 
 1,216
 538
 1,754
 (174) 2015
Streetsboro, OH (5,493) 5,481
 2,161
 214
 5,695
 2,161
 7,856
 (1,340) 2011
Strongsville, OH 
 5,853
 491
 23
 5,876
 491
 6,367
 (573) 2014
Sun Prairie, WI 
 5,809
 2,360
 2,377
 8,186
 2,360
 10,546
 (1,176) 2011
Toledo, OH 
 6,831
 213
 
 6,831
 213
 7,044
 (976) 2012
Burlington, NJ 
 
 3,267
 167
 167
 3,267
 3,434
 
 2015
Libertyville, IL 
 
 369
 2
 2
 369
 371
 
 2015
Libertyville, IL 
 
 397
 2
 2
 397
 399
 
 2015
Tulsa, OK 
 8,242
 966
 
 8,242
 966
 9,208
 (405) 2015
Twinsburg, OH 
 8,027
 590
 
 8,027
 590
 8,617
 (1,590) 2007
Visalia, CA 
 21,839
 4,346
 
 21,839
 4,346
 26,185
 (646) 2016
Vonore, TN (7,707) 8,243
 2,355
 85
 8,328
 2,355
 10,683
 (1,571) 2011
Waco, TX 
 1,394
 
 274
 1,668
 
 1,668
 (244) 2011
West Allis, WI 
 1,905
 462
 
 1,905
 462
 2,367
 (97) 2015
West Allis, WI 
 1,860
 444
 
 1,860
 444
 2,304
 (91) 2015
West Allis, WI 
 929
 252
 
 929
 252
 1,181
 (48) 2015
West Allis, WI 
 1,039
 251
 
 1,039
 251
 1,290
 (51) 2015
Walker, MI (3,685) 4,872
 855
 118
 4,990
 855
 5,845
 (949) 2011
Ware Shoals, SC (251) 197
 133
 
 197
 133
 330
 (29) 2012
Warren, MI 
 14,473
 1,290
 
 14,473
 1,290
 15,763
 (234) 2016
West Chester, OH 
 8,868
 936
 
 8,868
 936
 9,804
 (27) 2016
West Chicago, IL 
 2,036
 768
 
 2,036
 768
 2,804
 (8) 2016
West Chicago, IL 
 674
 382
 
 674
 382
 1,056
 (6) 2016
West Chicago, IL 
 768
 450
 
 768
 450
 1,218
 (5) 2016
West Chicago, IL 
 895
 369
 
 895
 369
 1,264
 (6) 2016

    Initial Cost to STAG Industrial, Inc.   Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2016    
City/State 
Encumbrances (1)
 
Building & Improvements (2)
 Land Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition and Valuation Provision Building & Improvements Land Total 
Accumulated Depreciation (3)
 Acq Date
West Chicago, IL 
 904
 216
 
 904
 216
 1,120
 (4) 2016
West Chicago, IL 
 6,247
 915
 59
 6,306
 915
 7,221
 (225) 2016
West Columbia, SC 
 9,570
 488
 
 9,570
 488
 10,058
 (29) 2016
West Columbia, SC 
 4,646
 551
 
 4,646
 551
 5,197
 (33) 2016
Westborough, MA 
 5,808
 661
 
 5,808
 661
 6,469
 (68) 2016
Hamilton, OH 
 8,585
 1,046
 
 8,585
 1,046
 9,631
 (1,290) 2014
Wichita, KS (1,529) 1,815
 88
 11
 1,826
 88
 1,914
 (214) 2012
Wichita, KS (1,671) 1,839
 107
 57
 1,896
 107
 2,003
 (257) 2012
Wichita, KS (764) 833
 76
 131
 964
 76
 1,040
 (109) 2012
Williamsport, PA 
 9,059
 688
 
 9,059
 688
 9,747
 (1,150) 2013
Winston-Salem, NC 
 11,054
 610
 16
 11,070
 610
 11,680
 (949) 2014
Wood Dale, IL 
 5,042
 1,226
 
 5,042
 1,226
 6,268
 (30) 2016
Woodstock, IL 
 3,796
 496
 
 3,796
 496
 4,292
 (520) 2012
Yorkville, WI (4,044) 4,915
 416
 
 4,915
 416
 5,331
 (339) 2014
Bardstown, KY 
 2,398
 379
 
 2,398
 379
 2,777
 (617) 2007
Total $(164,326) $1,673,800
 $272,162
 $63,754
 $1,737,554
 $272,162
 $2,009,716
 $(187,413)  
(1)Balance excludes the unamortized balance of fair market value premiums of approximately $0.1 million and unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of approximately $6.3 million.
(2)The initial costs of building and improvements is the acquisition costs less asset impairment write-downs and disposals of building and tenant improvements.
(3)Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method based on the following lives:

Buildings

Building
 40 yearsYears

Building and land improvements

 5 -Up to 20 years

Tenant improvements

 Shorter of useful life or terms of related lease


As of December 31, 2013,2016, the aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes of investments in real estate was approximately $1.4$2.6 billion.


Table of Contents


STAG Industrial, Inc. and STAG Predecessor Group

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2013

(in thousands)

        A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation is as follows:


 STAG Industrial, Inc. STAG
Predecessor
Group
  Year ended December 31,

 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 Year ended
December 31,
2012
 Period from
April 20, 2011 to
December 31,
2011
 Period from
January 1, 2011 to
April 19,
2011
  2016 2015 2014

Real Estate:

           
  
  

Balance at beginning of period

 $816,227 $502,258 $210,225 $210,186  $1,711,612
 $1,415,965
 $1,079,046

Additions during period

           
  
  

Other acquisitions

 266,389 322,719 292,426   381,131
 330,504
 337,726

Improvements, etc.

 6,757 3,541 4,513 39  33,133
 16,851
 13,608

Other additions

      
 
 

Deductions during period

           
  
  

Cost of real estate sold

 (9,073) (8,309) (4,544)   (97,342) (21,443) (10,539)

Write-off of tenant improvements

 (1,254) (576) (362)   (2,585) (1,205) (1,036)

Asset Impairments

  (3,406)   
         
Asset impairments and involuntary conversion (16,233) (29,060) (2,840)

Balance at the end of the period

 $1,079,046 $816,227 $502,258 $210,225  $2,009,716
 $1,711,612
 $1,415,965
         
         

Accumulated Depreciation:

           
  
  

Balance at beginning of period

 $46,175 $30,004 $20,959 $19,261  $147,917
 $105,435
 $71,653

Additions during period

           
  
  

Depreciation and amortization expense

 27,492 18,174 9,618 1,698  57,391
 48,186
 36,356

Other additions

      
 
 

Deductions during period

           
  
  

Disposals

 (2,014) (1,885) (573)   (17,895) (5,704) (2,574)

Other reductions

  (118)   
         

Balance at the end of the period

 $71,653 $46,175 $30,004 $20,959  $187,413
 $147,917
 $105,435
         
         

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit NumberDescription of Document
3.13.1
 Articles of Amendment and Restatement of STAG Industrial, Inc. (including all articles of amendment and articles supplementary)(13) (1)

3.2

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of STAG Industrial, Inc.(4) (2)

4.1

4.1

 

Form of Common Stock Certificate of STAG Industrial, Inc.(1) (3)

4.2

4.2

 

Form of Certificate for the 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of STAG Industrial, Inc.(9)


4.3


Form of Certificate for the 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of STAG Industrial, Inc.(14) (4)

4.3

Form of Certificate for the 6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of STAG Industrial, Inc. (5)
10.1

Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.(5) (6)

10.2

10.2

 

First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.(8) (7)

10.3

10.3

 

Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.(15) (8)

10.4

10.4
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. (9)
10.5

2011 Equity Incentive Plan(3)Plan (10)*

10.6

10.5

 

Amendment to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan(16)Plan, dated as of May 6, 2013 (11)*

10.7

10.6

 

Second Amendment to the 2011 Outperformance Program(7)Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of February 20, 2015 (12)*

10.8

10.7
2015 Outperformance Program (13)*
10.9

Form of LTIP Unit Agreement(3)Agreement (10)*

10.10

10.8
Form of Performance Award Agreement (1)*
10.11

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Benjamin S. Butcher, dated April 20, 2011(5)May 4, 2015 (14)*

10.12

10.9

 

Executive Employment Agreement with Gregory W. Sullivan,William R. Crooker, dated April 20, 2011(5)February 25, 2016 (11)*

10.13

10.10

 

Executive Employment Agreement with Stephen C. Mecke, dated April 20, 2011(5)2011 (6)*

10.14

10.11

 

Executive Employment Agreement with Kathryn Arnone,Jeffrey M. Sullivan, dated April 20, 2011(5)October 27, 2014 (6)*

10.15

10.12

 

Executive Employment Agreement with David G. King, dated April 20, 2011(5)2011 (6)*

10.16

10.13
Executive Employment Agreement with Peter S. Fearey, dated February 25, 2016 (1)*
10.17

Form of Indemnification Agreement between STAG Industrial, Inc. and its directors and officers(2)officers (17)*

10.18

10.14

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 20, 2011, by and among STAG Industrial, Inc., STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. and the persons named therein(5)therein (6)

10.19

10.15

 

Voting Agreement Termination Agreement, by and among STAG Industrial, Inc., STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. and the persons named therein(17)


10.16


Master Loan Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2010, by and among STAG GI Investments Holdings, LLC and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company(1)


10.17


Master Loan Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2010, by and among STAG GI Investments Holdings, LLC and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company(6)


10.18


Master Loan Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2011, by and among STAG GI Investments Holdings, LLC and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company(6)


10.19


Services Agreement between STAG Industrial Management, LLC and STAG Manager II, LLC, as amended

Table of Contents

(18)
Exhibit NumberDescription of Document
10.2010.20
 Services Agreement between STAG Industrial Management, LLC and STAG Manager III, LLC(5)


10.21


Credit Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2012, by andDecember 18, 2014, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, of America, N.A.National Association, and the other lenders party thereto(10)thereto (19)

10.21

10.22

 

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2013, by andSeptember 29, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, of America, N.A.National Association, and the other lenders party thereto(18)thereto (20)

10.22

10.23

 

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2013, byAmended and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto(19)


10.24


Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2012, among STAG Industrial Holdings, LLC and the sellers identified therein, as amended(10)


10.25


Loan Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2012, by and among Borrowers (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Lender(11)


10.26


Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2013,December 20, 2016, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Securities, LLCBank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto(12)thereto (21)

10.23

12.1
Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2016, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto (21)
10.24
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2015, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto (20)
10.25
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2014, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (22)
10.26
First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2014, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the noteholders named therein (19)



Exhibit NumberDescription of Document
10.27
Second Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the noteholders named therein (23)
10.28
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2014, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (19)
10.29
First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the noteholders named therein (23)
10.30
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (23)
12.10
Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges and earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

21.10

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of STAG Industrial, Inc.

23.10

23.1

 

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

24.10

24.1

 

Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

31.10

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.0

101

 

The following materials from STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132016 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (vi) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Equity, (v) the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes to these consolidated and combined financial statements.

*Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(1)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 3, 2016.
(2)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on April 8, 2011.
(3)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on September 24, 2010.
(4)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on April 11, 2013.
(5)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016.
(6)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 21, 2011.
(7)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 2, 2011.
(8)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2013.
(9)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2016.
(10)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on April 5, 2011.
(11)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 6, 2013.
(12)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015.
(13)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 15, 2015.
(14)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015.
(15)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2014.
(16)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 31, 2014.
(17)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the SEC on February 16, 2011.
(18)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2014.
(19)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 19, 2014.
(20)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 1, 2015.

*
Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(1)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 2010.

(2)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2011.

(3)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2011.

(4)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-168368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2011.
(21)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 27, 2016.
(22)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 22, 2014.
(23)Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2015.

(5)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2011.

(6)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2011.

(7)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2011.

(8)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2011.

(9)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A (File No. 333-177131) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2011.

(10)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2012.

(11)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2012.

(12)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2013.

(13)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2013.

(14)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2013.

(15)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2013.

(16)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2013.

(17)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2013.

(18)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013.

(19)
Incorporated by reference to STAG Industrial, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on October 10, 2013.