Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013




ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

Commission file number 001-33961

HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
 20-0953973
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

303 Lippincott Centre, Marlton, NJ
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

08053
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(856) 810-6200

        Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange

        Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:None



        Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o    No ý

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "accelerated filer," "large accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer ý Non-Accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 20132014 was approximately $67,710,000.$170,206,000. As of March 6, 2014,2015, there were 40,168,59150,373,757 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

        Portions of the proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Hill International, Inc. are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

   


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Form 10-K

PART I.I.

 

    

Item 1.

 

Business

  
4
 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  
1213
 

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  
2321
 

Item 2.

 

Properties

  
2321
 

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  
2422
 

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

  
2523
 


Part II.II.


 







 

Item 5.

 

Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  
2624
 

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  
2726
 

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  
2928
 

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  
45
 

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  
46
 

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  
9493
 

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  
9493
 

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

  
9594
 


Part III.III.


 







 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  
9695
 

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

  
9695
 

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  
9695
 

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  
9796
 

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  
9796
 


Part IV.IV.


 







 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  
9897
 

Table of Contents

PART I

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"). We may also make forward-looking statements in other reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), in materials delivered to stockholders and in press releases. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Although we believe that the expectations, estimates and assumptions reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as "may," "will," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "future," "intend," "plan," "could," "should," "potential" or "continue" or the negative or other variations thereof, as well as other statements regarding matters that are not historical fact.

        Those forward-looking statements may concern, among other things:

        Important factors that could cause our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in our forward-looking statements include:

        Other factors that may affect our businesses, financial position or results of operations include:

        We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. In accordance with the Reform Act, Item 1A of this Report entitled "Risk Factors" contains cautionary statements that accompany those forward-looking statements. You should carefully review such cautionary statements as


Table of Contents

they identify certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements and from historical trends. Those cautionary statements are not exclusive and are in addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in materials incorporated therein by reference.

Item 1.    Business.

General

        Hill International, Inc., with 4,1004,600 professionals in 100 offices worldwide, provides program management, project management, construction management, construction claims and other consulting services primarily to the buildings, transportation, environmental, energy and industrial markets. According to the June 16, 2014 edition ofEngineering News-Record magazine, recently ranked Hill asis the ninth largest construction management firm and tentheleventh largest program management firm headquartered in the United States. The terms "Hill", the "Company", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Hill International, Inc.

        We compete for business based on a variety of factors such as technical capability, global resources, price, reputation and past experience, including client requirements for substantial experience in similar projects and claims work. We have developed significant long-standing relationships, which bring us repeat business and would be very difficult to replicate. We believe we have an excellent reputation for developingattracting and rewarding employees which allows us to attract and retain superiorretaining professionals. In addition, we believe there are high barriers to entry for new competitors especially in the project management market.

Our Growth Strategy

        Our growth strategy is to increase our revenue through organic growth and expand our geographic reach and service offerings through strategic acquisitions. We seek to achieve these objectives throughemphasizes the following strategies:key elements:




Table of Contents


Table of Contents

Reporting Segments

        We primarily operate through two reporting segments: the Project Management Group and the Construction Claims Group. Our total revenue consists of two components: consulting fee revenue ("CFR") and reimbursable expenses. Reimbursable expenses are reflected in equal amounts in both total revenue and total direct expenses. Because these revenue/costs are subject to significant fluctuation from year to year, we measure the performance of many of our key operating metrics as a percentage of CFR, as we believe that this is a better and more consistent measure of operating performance than total revenue. Throughout this report we have used CFR as the denominator in many of our ratios. The following table sets forth the amount and percentage of CFR from our operations in each reporting segment for each of the past three fiscal years (dollars in thousands):

Consulting Fee Revenue ("CFR")


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Project Management

 $392,602 76.7%$312,232 74.8%$290,787 72.8% $427,515 74.2%$392,602 76.7%$312,232 74.8%

Construction Claims

 119,483 23.3 105,366 25.2 108,467 27.2  148,290 25.8 119,483 23.3 105,366 25.2 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

Project Management

        Our Project Management Group provides fee-based or "agency" construction management services to our clients, leveraging our construction expertise to identify potential trouble, difficulties and sources of delay on a construction project before they develop into costly problems. Our services include programexperienced professionals are capable of managing all phases of the construction process from concept through completion, including cost and budget controls, scheduling, estimating, expediting, inspection, contract administration and management project management, construction management, project management oversight, troubled project turnaround, staff augmentation, estimatingof contractors, subcontractors and cost management, project labor agreement consulting, commissioning, labor compliance and other services.suppliers.

        Our clients are typically billed a negotiated multiple of the actual direct cost of each consultantprofessional assigned to a project and we are reimbursed for our out-of-pocket expenses. We believe our fee-based consulting has significant advantages over traditional general contractors. Specifically, because we do not assume project completion risk, our fee-based model eliminates many of the risks typically associated with providing "at risk" construction services.

        We have managed all phases of the construction process on behalf of project owners and developers, from concept through completion. Specific activities that we undertake as part of these services include: planning, scheduling, estimating, budgeting, design review, constructability analyses, value engineering, regulatory compliance, development of project procedures, procurement, project reporting, expediting, inspection, quality assurance/quality control, safety oversight, contract administration, change order processing, claims management, and on-site management of contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.

Construction Claims

        Our Construction Claims Group advises clients in order to assist them in preventing or resolving claims and disputes based upon schedule delays, cost overruns and other problems on major construction projects worldwide.


Table of Contents

        We may be retained as a claims consultant at the onset of a project, during the course of a project or upon the completion of a project. We assist owners or contractors in adversarial situations as well as in situations where an amicable resolution is sought. Specific activities that we undertake as part of these services include claims preparation, analysis and review, litigation support, cost/damages


Table of Contents

assessment, delay/disruption analysis, adjudication, risk assessment, lender advisory, expert witness testimony and other services.

        Clients are typically billed based on an hourly rate for each consultant assigned to the project, and we are reimbursed for our out-of-pocket expenses. Our claims consulting clients include participants on all sides of a construction project, including owners, contractors, subcontractors, architects, engineers, attorneys, lenders and insurance companies.

Global Business

        We operate worldwide and currently have approximatelyover 100 offices in nearlyover 40 countries. The following table sets forth the amount and percentage of our CFR by geographic region for each of the past three fiscal years (dollars in thousands):

Consulting Fee Revenue by Geographic Region:


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

U.S./Canada

 $121,291 23.7%$117,593 28.2%$115,378 28.9% $125,691 21.8%$121,291 23.7%$117,593 28.2%

Latin America

 49,188 9.6 51,820 12.4 48,188 12.1  40,844 7.1 49,188 9.6 51,820 12.4 

Europe

 75,398 14.7 84,267 20.2 90,049 22.5  79,009 13.7 75,398 14.7 84,267 20.2 

Middle East

 219,315 42.8 134,037 32.1 108,720 27.2  270,924 47.1 219,315 42.8 134,037 32.1 

Africa

 22,744 4.4 13,591 3.3 17,451 4.4  23,849 4.1 22,744 4.4 13,591 3.3 

Asia/Pacific

 24,149 4.8 16,290 3.8 19,468 4.9  35,488 6.2 24,149 4.8 16,290 3.8 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

U.S.

 $117,740 23.0%$114,368 27.4%$112,098 28.1% $122,096 21.2%$117,740 23.0%$114,368 27.4%

Non-U.S.

 394,345 77.0 303,230 72.6 287,156 71.9  453,709 78.8 394,345 77.0 303,230 72.6 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

Growth Organically and Through Acquisitions

        Over the years, our business has expanded through organic growth and the acquisition of a number of project management and claims consulting businesses. Over the past 1617 years, we have completed 2223 acquisitions of project management and claims consulting businesses.

        We believe that our industry includes a number of small regional companies in a highly fragmented market. We believe that we have significant experience and expertise in identifying, negotiating, completing and integrating acquisitions and view the acquisition of these smaller competitors as a key part of our growth strategy. Through our acquisitions, we gained entry into the United Kingdom, Spain, Mexico, Poland, Australia, Brazil and South Africa and expanded our presence in the United States. These transactions have enabled us to accelerate our growth, strengthen our geographic diversity and compete more effectively.


Table of Contents

Clients

        Our clients consist primarily of the United States and other national governments, state and local governments, and the private sector. The following table sets forth our breakdown of CFR attributable to these categories of clients for each of the past three fiscal years (dollars in thousands):

Consulting Fee Revenue By Client Type:


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

U.S. federal government

 $14,958 2.9%$12,877 3.1%$11,667 2.9% $13,250 2.3%$14,958 2.9%$12,877 3.1%

U.S. state, regional and local governments

 69,477 13.6 61,790 14.8 64,734 16.2  74,921 13.0 69,477 13.6 61,790 14.8 

Foreign governments

 181,066 35.3 96,242 23.0 85,756 21.5  219,605 38.1 181,066 35.3 96,242 23.0 

Private sector

 246,584 48.2 246,689 59.1 237,097 59.4  268,029 46.6 246,584 48.2 246,689 59.1 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

        The following table sets forth the percentage of our consulting fee revenue contributed by each of our five largest clients for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011:2012:


 For the Years Ended
December 31,
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Largest Client

 10.0% 3.6% 3.2% 11.0% 10.0% 3.6%

2nd largest client

 3.4% 2.6% 2.3% 3.4% 3.4% 2.6%

3rd largest client

 2.3% 2.2% 2.1% 2.6% 2.3% 2.2%

4th largest client

 1.6% 2.1% 2.0% 2.6% 1.6% 2.1%

5th largest client

 1.6% 2.0% 1.9% 2.5% 1.6% 2.0%
       

Top 5 largest clients

 18.9% 12.5% 11.5% 22.1% 18.9% 12.5%
       
       

Business Development

        The process for acquiring business from each of our categories of clients is principally the same, by participating in a competitive request-for-proposal ("RFP") process, with the primary difference among clients being that the process for public sector clients is significantly more formal and complex than for private sector clients as a result of government procurement rules and regulations that govern the public-sector process.

        Although a significant factor in our business development consists of our standing in our industry, including existing relationships and reputation based on performance on completed projects, our marketing department undertakes a variety of activities in order to expand our exposure to potential new clients. These activities include media relations, advertising, promotions, market sector initiatives and maintaining our website and related web marketing. Media relations include placing articles that feature us and our personnel in trade publications and other media outlets. Our promotions include arranging speaking engagements for our personnel, participation in trade shows and other promotional activities. Market sector initiatives are designed to broaden our exposure to specific sectors of the construction industry, such as, for example, participating in or organizing industry seminars.

        For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, CFR from U.S. and foreign government contracts represented approximately 51.8%53.4% of our total CFR. Doing business with governments is complex and requires the ability to comply with intricate regulations and satisfy periodic audits. We believe that the ability to understand these requirements and to successfully conduct business with government agencies is a barrier to entry for smaller, less experienced competitors. Most government contracts, including


Table of Contents

those with foreign governments, are subject to termination by the government, to government audits and to continued appropriations.

        We are required from time to time to obtain various permits, licenses and approvals in order to conduct our business in many of the jurisdictions where we operate. Our businesses of providing project management and construction claims services are not subject to significant regulation by state, federal or foreign governments.

Contracts

        The price provisions of our contracts can be grouped into three broad categories: cost-plus, time and materials, and fixed-price. Cost-plus contracts provide for reimbursement of our costs and overhead plus a predetermined fee. Under some cost-plus contracts, our fee may be based partially on quality, schedule and other performance factors. We also enter into contracts whereby we bill our clients monthly at hourly billing rates. The hourly billing rates are determined by contract terms. For governmental clients, the hourly rates are generally calculated as salary costs plus overhead costs plus a negotiated profit percentage. For commercial clients, the hourly rate can be taken from a standard fee schedule by staff classification or it can be at a discount from this schedule. In some cases, primarily for foreign work, a monthly rate is negotiated rather than an hourly rate. This monthly rate is a build-up of staffing costs plus overhead and profit. We account for these contracts on a time-and-materials method, recognizing revenue as costs are incurred. Fixed-price contracts are accounted for using the "percentage-of-completion" method, wherein revenue is recognized as costs are incurred.

Backlog

        We believe a strong indicator of our future performance is our backlog of uncompleted projects under contract or awarded. Our backlog represents management's estimate of the amount of contracts and awards in hand that we expect to result in future consulting fee revenue.fees. Project Management backlog is evaluated by management on a project-by-project basis and is reported for each period shown based upon the binding nature of the underlying contract, commitment or letter of intent, and other factors, including the economic, financial and regulatory viability of the project and the likelihood of the contract being extended, renewed or cancelled. Construction Claims backlog is based largely on management's estimates of future revenue based on known construction claims assignments. Because a significant number of construction claims may be awarded and completed within the same period, our actual construction claims revenue has historically exceeded backlog by a significant amount.

        Our backlog is important to us in anticipating and planning for our operational needs. Backlog is not a measure defined in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and our methodology for determining backlog may not be comparable to the methodology used by other companies in determining their backlog.

        At December 31, 2013,2014, our backlog was a record $1,027,000,000, surpassing $1,000,000,000 for the first time in the Company's history,$1,080,000,000, compared to approximately $923,000,000$1,027,000,000 at December 31, 2012.2013. At December 31, 2013,2014, backlog attributable to futureuncompleted work in Libya amounted to approximately $44,000,000. We estimate that approximately $394,000,000,$470,000,000, or 38.4%43.5% of the backlog at December 31, 2013,2014, will be recognized during our 20142015 fiscal year.

        Although backlog reflects business that we consider to be firm, cancellations or scope adjustments may occur. Further, substantially all of our contracts with our clients may be terminated at will, in which case the client would only be obligated to us for services provided through the termination date. Historically, the impact of terminations and modifications on our realization of revenue from our backlog has not been significant, however, there can be no assurance that such changes will not be significant in the future. Furthermore, reductions of our backlog as a result of contract terminations and modifications may be offset by additions to the backlog.


Table of Contents

        We adjust backlog to reflect project cancellations, deferrals and revisions in scope and cost (both upward and downward) known at the reporting date. Future contract modifications or cancellations, however, may increase or reduce backlog and future revenue.


 Total Backlog 12-Month Backlog  Total Backlog 12-Month Backlog 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

As of December 31, 2014:

         

Project Management

 $1,034,000 95.7%$424,000 90.2%

Construction Claims

 46,000 4.3 46,000 9.8 

Total

 $1,080,000 100.0%$470,000 100.0%

As of September 30, 2014:

         

Project Management

 $1,026,000 95.6%$410,000 89.7%

Construction Claims

 47,000 4.4 47,000 10.3 

Total

 $1,073,000 100.0%$457,000 100.0%

As of December 31, 2013:

                  

Project Management

 $984,000 95.8% 351,000 89.1% $984,000 95.8%$351,000 89.1%

Construction Claims

 43,000 4.2 43,000 10.9  43,000 4.2 43,000 10.9 
         

Total

 $1,027,000 100.0%$394,000 100.0% $1,027,000 100.0%$394,000 100.0%
         
         

As of September 30, 2013:

         

Project Management

 $911,000 95.8%$342,000 89.5%

Construction Claims

 40,000 4.2 40,000 10.5 
         

Total

 $951,000 100.0%$382,000 100.0%
         
         

As of December 31, 2012:

         

Project Management

 $884,000 95.8%$343,000 89.8%

Construction Claims

 39,000 4.2 39,000 10.2 
         

Total

 $923,000 100.0%$382,000 100.0%
         
         

Competition

        The project management and claims consulting industries are highly competitive. We compete for contracts, primarily on the basis of technical capability, with numerous entities, including design or engineering firms, general contractors, other "pure" construction management companies, other claims consulting firms, the "Big Four" and other accounting firms, management consulting firms and other entities. Compared to us, many of these competitors are larger, well-established companies that have broader geographic scope and greater financial and other resources. During 2013,2014, some of our largest project management competitors included: AECOM Technology Corp.;, ARCADIS N.V.;, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.;, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.;, Parsons Corp.; and Turner Construction Co.; and URS Corp. Some of our largest claims consulting competitors last year included: Driver Group, Ltd., Exponent, Inc.;, Navigant Consulting, Inc. and Systech Group, Ltd.

Insurance

        We maintain insurance covering professional liability, as well as for claims involving bodily injury and property damage. We have historically enjoyed a favorable loss ratio in all lines of insurance and our management considers our present limits of liability, deductibles and reserves to be adequate. We endeavor to reduce or eliminate risk through the use of quality assurance/control, risk management, workplace safety and similar methods to eliminate or reduce the risk of losses on a project. Although our actual rates have decreased, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience increases in the dollar amount of our insurance premiums because of the increase in our revenue.

Management

        We are led by an experienced management team with significant experience in the construction industry. Additional information about our executive officers follows.


Table of Contents

Executive Officers

Name
 Age Position

Irvin E. Richter

69Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

David L. Richter

  4748 President and Chief Executive Officer

Raouf S. Ghali

53Chief Operating Officer Director

Thomas J. Spearing III

  4748 Regional President (Americas), Project Management Group (Americas)

Raouf S. GhaliMohammed Al Rais

  5261 Regional President (Middle East), Project Management Group (International)

Frederic Z. Samelian

  6667 President, Construction Claims Group

John Fanelli III

  5960 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Ronald F. Emma

  6263 Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

William H. Dengler, Jr. 

  4748 Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Catherine H. Emma

  5455 Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

Michael J. Petrisko

50Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

        IRVIN E. RICHTER has been Chairman of ourOn January 27, 2014, the Board of Directors since 1985 and he has beenapproved a leadership succession plan that provided for the transition of the Chief Executive Officer and a memberposition as of our Board of Directors since he foundedDecember 31, 2014 from Irvin E. Richter to David L. Richter. Irvin E. Richter has remained with the company in 1976. Mr. Richter is a Fellow of the Construction Management Association of America ("CMAA") and a member of the World Presidents' Organization. He is the author of several books includingHandbook of Construction Law & Claims andInternational Construction Claims: Avoiding and Resolving Disputes. He serves or has served on a number of Boards of Directors, including Rutgers University, Temple University Hospital and the CMAA. Mr. Richter holds a B.A. in government from Wesleyan University and a J.D. from Rutgers University School of Law at Camden, and he has been named a Distinguished Alumnus at both schools.Company as Chairman.

        DAVID L. RICHTER has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2014. Prior to his current position, he was our President and Chief Operating Officer sincefrom March 2004 to December 2014, and he has been a member of our Board of Directors since 1998. Prior to his current position, heBefore that, Mr. Richter was President of our Project Management Group from 2001 to 2004. Before that, Mr. Richter was2004, Senior Vice President and General Counsel from 1999 to 2001 and Vice President and General Counsel from 1995 to 1999. Prior to joining us, he was an attorney with the New York City law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP from 1992 to 1995. Mr. Richter is a Fellow of the CMAAConstruction Management Association of America (CMAA) and a member of the YoungWorld Presidents' Organization, the Construction Industry Round Table and the American Society of Civil Engineers. He is a former member of the Board of Trustees of the Southern New Jersey Development Council and the Board of Directors of the CMAA. Mr. Richter earned his B.S. in management, his B.S.E. in civil engineering and his J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania, and he is currently pursuing his M.Sc. in major program management from Oxford University.the University of Oxford. Mr. Richter is a son of Irvin E. Richter.

        RAOUF S. GHALI has been our Chief Operating Officer since January 2015. Prior to that, he was President of our Project Management Group (International) from January 2005 to January 2015, Senior Vice President in charge of project management operations in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East from 2001 to 2004, and Vice President from 1993 to 2001. Prior to joining us, he worked for Walt Disney Imagineering from 1988 to 1993. Mr. Ghali earned both a B.S. in business administration and economics and an M.S. in business organizational management from the University of LaVerne.

THOMAS J. SPEARING III has been Regional President (Americas) of our Project Management Group since January 2015. Prior to that, he was President of our Project Management Group (Americas) sincefrom April 2009. He was2009 to January 2015 and Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer from September 2007 to March 2009. Prior to joining Hill, Mr. Spearing worked for more than ten years with STV Group, Inc., most recently as Principal-in-Charge of its western region. Before that, Mr. Spearing was a Vice President of business development with Hill. Mr. Spearing earned his B.B.A. in computer and information science from Temple University, his B.S. in construction management and his B.S. in civil engineering from Spring Garden College, and his M.S. in management from Rosemont College. He is active in several industry, community and charitable organizations. He is founding co-chair of Pennsylvanians for Transportation Solutions (Pen Trans), is a Women's Transportation Seminar board member, and is a member of the MarchLegacy Foundation and Co-Chair of Dimes Transportation and Construction Committee and the Transit Builders' Trust. In addition, he has served in various leadership roles with the American Public Transit Association, including serving as chair, vice chair and secretary of its capital projects subcommittee.Capital Projects Subcommittee. Mr. Spearing also is active in the Southern New Jersey Development Council, the AEC Business Builders Forum, and the CMAA, among others.

RAOUF S. GHALI has been President of our Project Management Group (International) since January 2005. He was Senior Vice President in charge of project management operations in Europe,


Table of Contents

North AfricaMOHAMMED AL RAIS has been Regional President (Middle East) with Hill's Project Management Group since January 2015. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Managing Director (Middle East) of our Project Management Group from April 2010 to January 2015 and Vice President from 2006 to 2010. Mr. Al Rais has over 38 years of experience in the management of construction projects throughout the Middle East, North Africa, the United Kingdom and Canada. He earned his B.Sc. in city and regional planning from June 2001 to December 2004. During this time he was involved on somethe University of the mega projects asEngineering and Technology in Pakistan and his M.Sc. in project executive including Palm Island Jumeirah, Grand Egyptian Museum, National Latvian Library and several others. Mr. Ghali was a Vice President with us from 1993 to 2001. Prior to joining us, he worked for Walt Disney Imagineering from 1988 to 1993. Mr. Ghali earned both a B.S. in business administration and economics and an M.S. in business organizational management from the University of LaVerne.Reading in the United Kingdom. Mr. Al Rais is a member of the Association for Project Management in the U.K., the Canadian Business Council, the Society of Engineers in the U.A.E., the Chartered Management Institute and the Chartered Institute of Building.

        FREDERIC Z. SAMELIAN has been President of our Construction Claims Group since January 2005. He was a Senior Vice President with us from March 2003 until Decemberto 2004. Before that, Mr. Samelian was President of Conex International, Inc., a construction dispute resolution firm, from 2002 to 2003 and from 2000 to 2001, an Executive Director with Greyhawk North America, Inc., a construction management and consulting firm, from 2001 to 2002, and a Director with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1998 to 2000. Before that, he had worked with Hill from 1983 to August 1998. He served as Hill's President and Chief Operating Officer from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Samelian has a B.A. in international affairs from George Washington University and an M.B.A. from Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville. He is a Project Management Professional certified by the Project Management Institute and he is a licensed General Building Contractor in California and Nevada. Mr. Samelian is also a Member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) and is a CIArb Accredited Mediator. Mr. Samelian is also a licensed real estate salesperson in Nevada.

        JOHN FANELLI III has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2006. Before that, Mr. Fanelli was Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of CDI Corp. from June 2005 until Juneto 2006, and he was Vice President and Corporate Controller of CDI Corporation (a subsidiary of CDI Corp.) from October 2003 until Juneto 2006. CDI Corp. is a New York Stock Exchange-traded professional services and outsourcing firm based in Philadelphia with expertise in engineering, technical services and information technology. During 2003, Mr. Fanelli was a financial consultant to Berwind Corporation, an investment management company based in Philadelphia which owns a diversified portfolio of manufacturing and service businesses and real estate. Before that, Mr. Fanelli was employed for 18 years by Hunt Corporation, then a New York Stock Exchange-traded manufacturer and marketer of office products. At Hunt, he served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from 1995 until 2003, and before that as Director of Budgeting, Financial Analysis and Control, from 1985 to 1995. Before that, Mr. Fanelli was employed with Coopers & Lybrand for eight years in various accounting and auditing positions. Mr. Fanelli earned his B.S. in accounting from LaSalle University and he is a Certified Public Accountant in Pennsylvania.

        RONALD F. EMMA has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since January 2007. Mr. Emma had been Senior Vice President of Finance from August 1999 to January 2007. Before that, he was Vice President of Finance. Mr. Emma has been with Hill since 1980. Before joining Hill, he was Assistant Controller of General Energy Resources, Inc., a mechanical contracting firm, and prior to that was a Staff Accountant with the accounting firm of Haskins & Sells. Mr. Emma has a B.S. in accounting from St. Joseph's University and he is a Certified Public Accountant in New Jersey.

        WILLIAM H. DENGLER, JR. has been our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since March 2007. Mr. Dengler was previously Vice President and General Counsel from January 2002 to March 2007, and Corporate Counsel from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Dengler also serves as corporate secretary to Hill and its subsidiaries. Prior to joining Hill, Mr. Dengler served as Assistant Counsel to former New Jersey Governors Donald DiFrancesco and Christine Todd Whitman from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Dengler earned his B.A. in political science from Western Maryland College and his J.D. from Rutgers University


Table of Contents

School of Law at Camden. He is licensed to practice law in New Jersey, as well as before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.


Table of Contents

        CATHERINE H. EMMA has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since January 2007. Ms. Emma had been Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from August 2005 to January 2007. Before that, she served as Vice President of Human Resources and Administration. Ms. Emma has been with Hill since 1982. She is certified by the Society for Human Resource Management as a Professional in Human Resources (PHR) and has heldholds professional memberships with Tri-State Human Resources and the Society for Human Resource Management and the BNAManagement. Ms. Emma previously participated in BNA's Human Resources Personnel Policies Forum. Ms. Emma is the wife of Ronald F. Emma.

MICHAEL J. PETRISKO has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since June 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Petrisko was Vice President and Chief Information Officer for STV Group, an architecture, engineering and construction management firm, from June 2012 through June 2014. Before that, Mr. Petrisko was Hill's Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from January 2009 through June 2012, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2007 to 2008. Before that, Mr. Petrisko was Director of Global IT Operations for AECOM Technology Corp. from 2005 to 2007 and Vice President and Chief Information Officer for DMJM Harris, Inc., a subsidiary of AECOM Technology Corp., a global architecture, engineering and construction management firm, from 2002 to 2005. From 1999 to 2002, he was Director of Technical Services for Foster Wheeler Corp., an engineering and construction services firm. Mr. Petrisko studied management information technology at Thomas Edison State College and he is a member of the New Jersey Society of Information Management and a member of the CMAA.

Employees

        At February 28, 2014,2015, we had 4,1114,558 personnel. Of these individuals 3,3453,656 worked in our Project Management Group, 650793 worked in our Construction Claims Group and 116109 worked in our Corporate Group. Our personnel included 3,3833,784 full-time employees, 249248 part-time employees and 479526 independent contractors. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and we have not experienced any strikes or work stoppages. We consider our relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.

Access to Company Information

        We electronically file our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains periodic reports, proxy statements, information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

        We make available, free of charge, through our website or by responding to requests addressed to our Legal Department, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed by us with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. These reports are available as soon as practicable after such material is filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our primary website is www.hillintl.com. We post the charters for our audit, compensation and governance and nominating committees, corporate governance principles and code of ethics in the "Investor Relations" section of our website. The information contained on our website, or on other websites linked to our website, is not part of this document.


Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

        Our business involves a number of risks, some of which are beyond our control. The risks and uncertainties described below could individually or collectively have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, profitability or prospects. While these are not the only risks and uncertainties we face, we believe that the more significant risks and uncertainties are as follows:

Risks Affecting the Business

Acts of terrorism, political, governmental and social upheaval and threats of armed conflicts in or around various areas in which we operate could limit or disrupt markets and our operations, including disruptions resulting from the evacuation of personnel, cancellation of contracts or the loss of personnel.

        Acts of terrorism, political, governmental and social upheaval and threats of armed conflicts in or around various areas in which we operate could limit or disrupt markets and our operations, including disruptions resulting from the evacuation of personnel, cancellation of contracts or the loss of personnel, and may affect timing and collectibility of our accounts receivable. Such events may cause


Table of Contents

further disruption to financial and commercial markets and may generate greater political and economic instability in some of the geographic areas in which we operate. In addition, any possible reprisals as a consequence of the wars and ongoing military action in the Middle East and Africa, such as acts of terrorism in the United States or elsewhere, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.

If our clients delay in paying or fail to pay amounts owed to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

        Accounts receivable represent the largest asset on our balance sheet. While we take steps to evaluate and manage the credit risks relating to our clients, economic downturns or other events can adversely affect the markets we serve and our clients ability to pay, which could reduce our ability to collect all amounts due from clients. In addition, the political unrest in countries in which we operate has impacted and may in the future impact our collections on accounts receivable. If our clients delay in paying or fail to pay us a significant amount of our outstanding receivables, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition.

        For example, due to the political unrest which commenced in Libya in February 2011, we suspended our operations in and demobilized substantially all of our personnel from Libya. We have open but inactive contractssubstantial non-current accounts receivable related to our prior work in Libya. During 2013 and early 2014, we received paymentsPlease refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for a broader discussion of approximately $9,200,000 from our client, the Libyan Organization for the Development of Administrative Centres ("ODAC"), for work performed prior to March 2011. The remaining accounts receivable balance with ODAC is now $50,800,000. Since the end of the Libyan civil unrest in October 2011, the Company has sought to recover its receivable from ODAC through ongoing negotiations rather than pursue its legal rights for payment under the contracts. The Company believes that this course of action provides the best likelihood for recovery as it could result in completion of and payment on the existing contracts as well as the potential for the award of new contracts. There is at present no agreement, understanding or timetable for further payments of Hill's accounts receivable from ODAC or a return to work on Hill's existing contracts. However, management believes that these payments, along with letters of credit of approximately $14,000,000 posted in our favor by ODAC, were made in good faith and are a positive indication that ODAC intends to satisfy its obligations to Hill. However, the Company cannot predict with certainty when, or if, the remaining accounts receivable will be paid by the Libyan authorities or when work will resume there. In the event that we do not realize any further payments, there could be a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position.matter.

Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect our business, liquidity and financial results.

        The markets that we serve are cyclical and subject to fluctuation based on general global economic conditions and other factors. Unfavorable global economic conditions, including disruption of financial markets in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, could adversely affect our business and results of operations, primarily by limiting our access to credit and disrupting our clients' businesses. The reduction in financial institutions' willingness or ability to lend has increased the cost of capital and reduced the availability of credit. Although we currently believe that the financial institutions with which we do business will be able to fulfill their commitments to us, there is no assurance that those institutions will be able or willing to continue to do so, which could have a material adverse impact on our business. The current European debt crisis and related European restructuring efforts may cause the value of European currencies, including the Euro and British pound sterling, to deteriorate, thus reducing the purchasing power of European clients and reducing the translated amounts of U.S. dollar revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2013, 14.7%2014, 13.7% of our consulting fee revenue was attributable to European clients. In addition, continuation or worsening ofany negative change in general market conditions in the United States, Europe or other national economies important to our businesses may adversely affect our


Table of Contents

clients' level of spending, ability to obtain financing, and ability to make timely payments to us for our


Table of Contents

services, which could require us to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, negatively impact our days sales outstanding and adversely affect our results of operations.

We cannot be certain that we will be able to raise capital or obtain debt financing to meet required capital needs.

        We are currently party to a revolving credit agreement to assist in funding working capital needs. This agreement provides for a maximum total outstanding debt (that is, borrowings plus letters of credit) amounting to $65,000,000. The Company is required to comply with certain financial covenants with respect to leverage ratios and a fixed charge ratio as well as other covenants. If our operating results and financial liquidity are not as positive as we expect, that could cause us to be in violation of these covenants.

        In addition, our current revolving credit agreement may not provide us with sufficient credit to meet all of the future financial needs of our business. We may be unable to increase availability under our current revolving credit agreement or obtain alternative debt or equity financing on terms that would be acceptable to us, or at all.

We may be unable to win new contract awards if we cannot provide clients with letters of credit, bonds or other forms of guarantees.

        In certain international regions, primarily the Middle East, it is industry practice for clients to require letters of credit, bonds, bank guarantees or other forms of guarantees. These letters of credit, bonds or guarantees indemnify our clients if we fail to perform our obligations under our contracts. We currently have relationships with various domestic and international banking institutions to assist us in providing clients with letters of credit or guarantees. Because of current overallIn the event there are limitations in worldwide banking capacity, we may find it difficult to find sufficient bonding capacity to meet our future bonding needs. Failure to provide credit enhancements on terms required by a client may result in our inability to compete or win a project.

International operations and doing business with foreign governments expose us to legal, political, operational and economic risks in different countries and currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our financial results.

        Our international operations contributed 77.0%78.8%, 72.6%77.0% and 71.9%72.6% of our consulting fee revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. There are risks inherent in doing business internationally, including:


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

        Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

We operate in many different jurisdictions and we could be adversely affected by any violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or similar worldwide and local anti-corruption laws.

        The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 and similar worldwide and local anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our internal policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. The policies also are applicable to agents through which we do business in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, we cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures always will protect us from improper or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. Our continued expansion outside the U.S., including in developing countries, could increase the risk of such violations in the future. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business, subject us to fines, penalties and restrictions and otherwise result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. All of our recently acquired businesses are subject to our internal policies. However, because our internal policies are more restrictive than some local laws or customs where we operate, we may be at an increased risk for violations while we train our new employees to comply with our internal policies and procedures.

Our business sometimes requires our employees to travel to and work in high security risk countries, which may result in employee injury, repatriation costs or other unforeseen costs.

        Many of our employees often travel to and work in high security risk countries around the world that are undergoing or that may undergo political, social and economic upheavals resulting in war, civil unrest, criminal activity or acts of terrorism. For example, we have had and expect to have significant projects in the Middle East and Africa, including in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Oman. As a result, we may be subject to costs related to employee injury, repatriation or other unforeseen circumstances. Further, circumstances in these countries could make it difficult or impossible to attract and retain qualified employees. Our inability to attract and retain qualified employees to work in these counties could have a material adverse effect on our operations.


Table of Contents

Our business is sensitive to oil and gas prices, and fluctuations in oil and gas prices may negatively affect our business.

        Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. In 2013,2014, approximately 47.2%51.2% of our consulting fee revenue was derived from our operations in major oil and gas producing countries in the Middle East and Africa. A significant drop in oil or gas prices could lead to a slowdown in construction in these regions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition orand cash flows.

We depend on government contracts for a significant portion of our consulting fee revenue. Our inability to win profitable government contracts could harm our operations and adversely affect our net earnings.

        In 2013,2014, U.S. federal government contracts and U.S. state, regional and local government contracts contributed approximately 2.9%2.3% and 13.6%13.0%, respectively, of our consulting fee revenue, and foreign government contracts contributed approximately 35.3%38.1% of our consulting fee revenue. Our inability to win profitable government contracts could harm our operations and adversely affect our net earnings.


Table of Contents

Government contracts are typically awarded through a heavily regulated procurement process. Some government contracts are awarded to multiple competitors, causing increases in overall competition and pricing pressure. In turn, the competition and pricing pressure may require us to make sustained post-award efforts to reduce costs under these contracts. If we are not successful in reducing the amount of costs, our profitability on these contracts may be negatively impacted. Also, some of our federal government contracts require U.S. government security clearances. If we or certain of our personnel were to lose these security clearances, our ability to continue performance of these contracts or to win new contracts requiring such clearances may be negatively impacted.

We depend on long-term government contracts, many of which are funded on an annual basis. If appropriations are not made in subsequent years of a multiple-year contract, we will not realize all of our potential revenue and profit from that project.

        A significant portion of our consulting fee revenue is derived from contracts with federal, state, regional, local and foreign governments. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, approximately 53.4%, 51.8% and 2011, approximately 51.8%, 40.9% and 40.6%, respectively, of our consulting fee revenue were derived from such contracts.

        Most government contracts are subject to the continuing availability of legislative appropriation. Legislatures typically appropriate funds for a given program on a year-by-year basis, even though contract performance may take more than one year. As a result, at the beginning of a program, the related contract is only partially funded, and additional funding is normally committed only as appropriations are made in each subsequent fiscal year. These appropriations and the timing of payment of appropriated amounts may be influenced by, among other things, the state of the economy, budgetary and other political issues affecting the particular government and its appropriations process, competing priorities for appropriation, the timing and amount of tax receipts and the overall level of government expenditures. If appropriations are not made in subsequent years on government contracts, then we will not realize all of our potential revenue and profit from those contracts.

We depend on contracts that may be terminated by our clients on short notice, which may adversely impact our ability to recognize all of our potential revenue and profit from the project.projects.

        Substantially all of our contracts are subject to termination by the client either at its convenience or upon our default. If one of our clients terminates a contract at its convenience, then we typically are able to recover only costs incurred or committed, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to termination, which could prevent us from recognizing all of our potential revenue and profit


Table of Contents

from that contract. If one of our clients terminates the contract due to our default, we could be liable for excess costs incurred by the client in re-procuring services from another source, as well as other costs.

Our business is subject to numerous laws, regulations and restrictions, and failure to comply with these laws, regulations and restrictions could subject us to fines, penalties, suspension or debarment.

        Our contracts and operations are subject to various laws and regulations. Prime contracts with various agencies of the U.S. federal government, and subcontracts with other prime contractors, are subject to numerous procurement regulations, including the Federal Acquisition Regulations and the False Claims Act. We could be subject to fines, penalties or debarment, or suspended from receiving additional contracts with all U.S. government agencies if any one agency finds that we are not in compliance with the appropriate regulations. Although a small percentage of our business is from U.S. federal government contracts, suspension or debarment from business with the U.S. federal government could impact other public-sector clients and have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

        Our international business subjects us to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to economic sanctions and other trade controls, technology transfer restrictions, repatriation of earnings, exchange controls, the FCPA and the anti-boycott provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Act. Changes in regulations or political environments may affect our ability to conduct business in foreign markets including investment, procurement and repatriation of earnings. Failure by us or our sales representatives or consultants to comply with these laws and regulations could result in certain liabilities and could possibly result in suspension or debarment from government contracts, which could have other repercussions and thus could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Our contracts with governmental agencies are subject to audit, which could result in adjustments to reimbursable contract costs or, if we are charged with wrongdoing, possible temporary or permanent suspension from participating in government programs.

        Our books and records are subject to audit by the various governmental agencies we serve and by their representatives. These audits can result in adjustments to reimbursable contract costs and allocated overhead. In addition, if as a result of an audit, we or one of our subsidiaries is charged with wrongdoing or the government agency determines that we or one of our subsidiaries is otherwise no longer eligible for federal contracts, then we or, as applicable, that subsidiary, could be temporarily suspended or, in the event of convictions or civil judgments, could be prohibited from bidding on and receiving future government contracts for a period of time. Furthermore, as a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to an increased risk of investigations, criminal prosecution, civil fraud, whistleblower lawsuits and other legal actions and liabilities, the results of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.


Table of Contents

We submit change orders to our clients for work we perform beyond the scope of some of our contracts. If our clients do not approve these change orders, our net earnings could be adversely impacted.

        We typically submit change orders under some of our contracts for payment for work performed beyond the initial contractual requirements. The clients may not approve or may contest these change orders and we cannot assure you that these claims will be approved in whole, in part or at all. If these claims are not approved, our net earnings could be adversely impacted.


Table of Contents

Because our backlog of uncompleted projects under contract or awarded is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations, including the amount, if any, of future appropriations by the applicable contracting governmental agency, it may not be indicative of our future revenue and profits.

        At December 31, 2013,2014, our backlog of uncompleted projects under contract or awarded was approximately $1.027$1.080 billion. The inability to obtain financing or governmental approvals, changes in economic or market conditions or other unforeseen events, such as terrorist acts or natural disasters, could lead to us not realizing any revenue under some or all of these contracts. We cannot assure you that the backlog attributed to any of our uncompleted projects under contract will be realized as revenue or, if realized, will result in profits.

        Many projects may remain in our backlog for an extended period of time because of the size or long-term nature of the contract. In addition, from time to time projects are scaled back or cancelled. These types of backlog reductions adversely affect the revenue and profit that we ultimately receive. Included in our backlog is the maximum amount of all indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity ("ID/IQ"), or task order, contracts, or a lesser amount if we do not reasonably expect to be issued task orders for the maximum amount of such contracts. A significant amount of our backlog is derived from ID/IQ contracts and we cannot provide any assurance that we will in fact be awarded the maximum amount of such contracts.

Our dependence on subcontractors, partners and specialists could adversely affect our business.

        We rely on third-party subcontractors as well as third-party strategic partners and specialists to complete our projects. To the extent that we cannot engage such subcontractors, partners or specialists or cannot engage them on a competitive basis, our ability to complete a project in a timely fashion or at a profit may be impaired. If we are unable to engage appropriate strategic partners or specialists in some instances, we could lose the ability to win some contracts. In addition, if a subcontractor or specialist is unable to deliver its services according to the negotiated terms for any reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition or over-commitment of its resources, we may be required to purchase the services from another source at a higher price. This may reduce the profit to be realized or result in a loss on a project for which the services were needed.

If our partners fail to perform their contractual obligations on a project, we could be exposed to legal liability, loss of reputation or reduced profits.

        We sometimes enter into joint venture agreements and other contractual arrangements with outside partners to jointly bid on and execute a particular project. The success of these joint projects depends on the satisfactory performance of the contractual obligations of our partners. If any of our partners fails to satisfactorily perform its contractual obligations, we may be required to make additional investments and provide additional services to complete the project. If we are unable to adequately address our partner's performance issues, then our client could terminate the joint project, exposing us to legal liability, loss of reputation or reduced profits.

Our services expose us to significant risks of liability and our insurance policies may not provide adequate coverage.

        Our services involve significant risks of professional and other liabilities that may substantially exceed the fees that we derive from our services. In addition, we sometimes contractually assume liability under indemnification agreements. We cannot predict the magnitude of potential liabilities from the operation of our business.

        We currently maintain comprehensive general liability, umbrella and professional liability insurance policies. Professional liability policies are "claims made" policies. Thus, only claims made during the term of the policy are covered. Additionally, our insurance policies may not protect us against potential


Table of Contents

liability due to various exclusions and retentions. Partially or completely uninsured claims, if successful and of significant magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The project management and construction claims businesses are highly competitive and if we fail to compete effectively, we may miss new business opportunities or lose existing clients and our revenues and profitability may decline.

        The project management and construction claims industries are highly competitive. We compete for contracts, primarily on the basis of technical capability, with numerous entities, including design or engineering firms, general contractors, other "pure" construction management companies, other claims consulting firms, the "Big Four" and other accounting firms, management consulting firms and other entities. Compared to us, many of these competitors are larger, well-established companies that have broader geographic scope and greater financial and other resources. If we cannot compete effectively with our competitors, or if the costs of competing, including the costs of retaining and hiring professionals, become too expensive, our revenue growth and financial results may differ materially from our expectations.

We have acquired and may continue to acquire businesses as strategic opportunities arise and may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of those acquisitions, or if we are unable to take advantage of strategic acquisition situations, our ability to expand our business may be slowed or curtailed.

        Over the past 1617 years, we have acquired 2223 businesses and our strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our operations with additional acquisitions as strategic opportunities arise. If the competition for acquisitions increases, or if the cost of acquiring businesses or assets becomes too expensive, the number of suitable acquisition opportunities may decline, the cost of making an acquisition may increase or we may be forced to agree to less advantageous acquisition terms for the companies that we are able to acquire. Alternatively, at the time an acquisition opportunity presents itself, internal and external pressures (including, but not limited to, borrowing capacity under our credit facilities or the availability of alternative financing), may cause us to be unable to pursue or complete an acquisition. Our ability to grow our business, particularly through acquisitions, may depend on our ability to raise capital by selling equity or debt securities or obtaining additional debt financing. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing when we need it or on terms acceptable to us. Some of the financial, business and operational risks associated with acquisitions include:


Table of Contents

        In addition, managing the growth of our operations will require us to continually increase and improve our operational, financial and human resources management and our internal systems and controls. If we are unable to manage growth effectively or to successfully integrate acquisitions or if we are unable to grow our business, that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may be required to write-off all or a portion of the carrying value of intangibles and goodwill of companies we have acquired.

        At December 31, 2013, we had $24,964,000 of intangible assets and $85,853,000 of goodwill which represent 5.6% and 19.1% of our total assets. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to test the carrying value of our intangible assets, including goodwill, for impairment at least annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets may not be recoverable, include a sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a significant non-cash impairment charge in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets is determined, negatively impacting our results of operations and financial condition.

Our effective tax rate may increase or decrease.increase.

        We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe that our tax estimates and tax positions are reasonable, they could be materially affected by many factors including the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation, the introduction of new tax accounting standards, legislation, regulations, and related interpretations, our global mix of earnings, the realizability of deferred tax assets and changes in uncertain tax positions. A significant increase in our effective tax rate could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to operate and our operating results.

        As a global company, we are heavily reliant on computer, information and communications technology and related systems in order to properly operate. From time to time, we experience system interruptions and delays. In the event we are unable to regularly deploy software and hardware,


Table of Contents

effectively upgrade our systems and network infrastructure, and take other steps to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our systems, the operation of such systems could be interrupted or delayed, or our data security could be breached. In addition, our computer and communications systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war or terrorism, acts of God, computer viruses, physical or electronic security breaches. Any of these or other events could cause system interruptions, delays, and loss of critical data including private data. While we have taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or loss or data security breach will not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

If our internal controls prove to be ineffective, it could impact our business and operating results.

     ��  Our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of the inherent limitations of internal controls or otherwise, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only


Table of Contents

reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations.

Our use of accounting estimates involves judgment and could impact our financial results.

        The application of generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions about certain items and future events that directly affect our reported financial condition. Our most critical accounting estimates are described in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", under "Critical Accounting Policies." In addition, as discussed in Note 14, "Commitments and Contingencies," we make certain estimates including decisions related to legal proceedings and reserves. These estimates and assumptions involve the use of judgment. As a result, actual financial results may differ.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The market price for our common stock could be volatile and could decline, resulting in a substantial or complete loss of your investment.

        The stock markets, including the New York Stock Exchange on which our common stock is listed, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. As a result, the market price of our common stock could be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. The price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including:

Future sales of our common and preferred stock may depress the price of our common stock.

        As of March 6, 2014,2015, there were 40,168,59150,373,757 shares of our common stock outstanding. An additional 6,574,1568,327,626 shares of our common stock may be issued upon the exercise of options held by employees, management and directors. We also have the authority to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock upon terms that are determined by our Board of Directors and additional options to purchase 1,366,8441,088,974 shares of our common stock without stockholder approval. In addition, in 2011, we registeredhave a registration statement on file with the SEC for the potential issuance of 20,000,000 common shares and 8,000,000 common shares. These shareswhich may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, or used in future acquisitions, respectively, subject to the restrictions of our Secured Credit Agreement. During 2013, we issued


TableFacilities and another registration statement on file with the SEC for the potential issuance of Contents

1,389,769an additional 20,000,000 common shares of our common stockwhich may be used in connection with twofuture acquisitions. Sales of a substantial number of these shares in the public market, or factors relating to the terms we may determine for our preferred stock, options or warrants, could decrease the market price of our common stock. In addition, the perception that such sales might occur may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Future issuances or sales of our common stock could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Because we have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

        We may retain future earnings, if any, for future operations, expansion and debt repayment and have no current plans to pay any cash dividends. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends may be limited by covenants of any existing and future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur, including our revolving credit agreement.Secured Credit Facilities. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We are able to issue shares of preferred stock with greater rights than our common stock.

        Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue one or more series of preferred stock from time to time without any action on the part of our stockholders. Our Board of Directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends and other terms. If we issue preferred stock in the future that has a preference over our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or other terms, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our common stock, the rights of holders of our common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.


Table of Contents

Provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law could discourage potential acquisition proposals, could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company that our stockholders may consider favorable and could adversely affect the market value of our common stock.

        Provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law could discourage potential acquisition proposals, could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company that our stockholders may consider favorable and could adversely affect the market value of our common stock. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions that:


Table of Contents

        These provisions may make it more difficult for stockholders to take specific corporate actions and could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company.

        In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law imposes certain restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between the Company and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. This provision is applicable to Hill and may have an anti-takeover effect that may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in the stockholder's best interest. In general, Section 203 could delay for three years and impose conditions upon "business combinations" between an "interested shareholder" and Hill, unless prior approval by our Board of Directors is given. The term "business combination" is defined broadly to include mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in financial benefit to a stockholder. An "interested shareholder," in general, would be a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years, did own, 15% or more of a corporation's voting stock.

A small group of stockholders own a large quantity of our common stock, thereby potentially exerting significant influence over the Company.

        As of December 31, 2013,2014, Irvin E. Richter, David L. Richter and other members of the Richter family beneficially owned approximately 33%22% of our common stock. This concentration of ownership could significantly influence matters requiring stockholder approval and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other business combinations that might otherwise be beneficial to our other stockholders. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may impact the market price of


Table of Contents

our common stock. In addition, the interest of our significant stockholders may not always coincide with the interest of the Company's other stockholders. In deciding how to vote on such matters, they may be influenced by interests that conflict with our other stockholders.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments.

        None.

Item 2.    Properties.

        Our executive and operating offices are located at 303 Lippincott Centre, Marlton, New Jersey 08053.08053, however in the near future, we intend to complete our move of such offices to One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, 17th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. We lease all of our office space and do not own any real property. The telephone number at our executive office is (856) 810-6200. In addition to our executive offices, we have approximately 100 operating leases for office facilities throughout the world. Due to acquisition and growth we may have more than one operating lease in the cities in which we are located. Additional space may be required as our business expands geographically, but we believe we will be able to obtain suitable space as needed.


Table of Contents

        As of February 28, 2014,2015, our principal worldwide office locations and the geographic regions in which we reflect their operations are:

U.S./Canada
Albuquerque, NM
Atlanta, GA
Austin, TX
Bensalem, PA
Boston, MA
Broadview Heights, OH
Columbus, OH
Danbury, CT
Fresno, CA
Granite Bay, CA
Hartford, CT
Houston, TX
Irvine, CA
Irving, TX
Jacksonville, FL
Las Vegas, NV
Lemont Furnace, PA
Los Angeles, CA
Marlton, NJ
Miami, FL
Montgomeryville, PA
New Orleans, LA
New York, NY
Ontario, CA
Orlando, FL
Perrysburg, OH
Philadelphia, PA
Phoenix, AZ
Pittsburgh, PA
Providence, RI
San Diego, CA
San Francisco, CA
Seattle, WA
 Spokane, WA
Tampa, FL
Toronto, Canada
Washington, DC

Europe
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Ankara, Turkey
Athens, Greece
Baku, Azerbaijan
Barcelona, Spain
Belgrade, Serbia
Birmingham, UK
Bristol, UK
Bucharest, Romania
Daresbury, UK
Dusseldorf, Germany
Edinburgh, Scotland
Istanbul, Turkey
Leeds, UK
London, UK
Madrid, Spain
Montreal, France
Munich, Germany
Pristina, Kosovo
Riga, Latvia
Teesside, UK
Warsaw, Poland

Latin America
Bogota, Colombia
Mexico City, Mexico
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Santiago, Chile
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Trinidad and Tobago
 Middle East
Albuquerque, NMAmsterdam, NetherlandsAbu Dhabi, UAE
Atlanta, GAAnkara, TurkeyAqaba, Jordan
Austin, TXAstana City, KazakhstanBaghdad, Iraq
Bensalem, PAAthens, GreeceDoha, Qatar
Boston, MABaku, AzerbaijanDubai, UAE
Broadview Heights, OHBarcelona, SpainErbil, Kurdistan
Columbus, OHBelgrade, SerbiaJeddah, Saudi Arabia
East Hartford, CTBirmingham, UKKabul, Afghanistan
Fresno, CABristol, UKManama, Bahrain
Granite Bay, CABucharest, RomaniaMuscat, Oman
Houston, TXCumbria, UKRiyadh, Saudi Arabia
Irvine, CADaresbury, UKSharq, Kuwait

Irving, TXDundee, UK
Jacksonville, FLDusseldorf, GermanyAfrica
Las Vegas, NVEdinburgh, ScotlandAlgiers, Algeria
Lemont Furnace, PAGeneva, SwitzerlandCairo, Egypt
Los Angeles, CAGlasgow, UKCape Town, South Africa
Marlton, NJHamburg, GermanyCasablanca, Morocco
Miami, FLIstanbul, TurkeyJohannesburg, South Africa
Mission Viejo, CALondon, UKPretoria, South Africa
New Orleans, LALuxembourgTripoli, Libya

New York, NYMadrid, Spain
Ontario, CAMunich, GermanyAsia/Pacific
Orlando, FLPristina, KosovoBeijing, China
Perrysburg, OHRiga, LatviaBrisbane, Australia
Danang
Philadelphia, PATeesside, UKDa Nang City, Vietnam
Phoenix, AZWarsaw, PolandGurgaon, India
Pittsburgh, PAHong Kong, China
Providence, RILatin America/Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
San Diego, CAthe CarribbeanManila, Philippines
San Francisco, CABogota, ColombiaMelbourne, Australia
Seattle, WAMexico City, MexicoPerth, Australia
Spokane, WARio de Janeiro, BrazilShanghai, China
Tampa, FLSantiago, ChileSingapore
Toronto, CanadaSao Paulo, BrazilSydney, Australia
Washington, DCTrinidad and Tobago

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

General Litigation

        M.A. Angeliades, Inc. ("Plaintiff") has filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of New York against the Company and the New York City Department of Design and Construction ("DDC") regarding payment of approximately $8,771,000 for work performed as a subcontractor to the Company plus interest and other costs. The Company has accrued approximately $2,340,000, including interest of $448,000, based on invoices received from Plaintiff who has refused to providenot provided certain invoices for the additional work that Plaintiff claims to have performed. Until such time as the Company obtains invoices for the additional work and is able to provide those invoices to DDC for reimbursement or


Table of Contents

there is a full resolution of the litigation, it has no intention of paying Plaintiff. The Company believes that its position is defensible, however, there can be no assurance that it will receive a favorable verdict should this case proceed to trial.


Table of Contents

        From time to time, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions which arise in the normal course of business. As such the Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of the provision required for these commitments and contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful analysis of each matter. The provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes in circumstances. Changes in the provision could increase or decrease the Company's earnings in the period the changes are made. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures.

        Not applicable.


Table of Contents


PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

        Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the trading symbol "HIL." The following table includes the range of high and low trading prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE for the periods presented.


 Price Range  Price Range 

 High Low  High Low 

2014

     

Fourth Quarter

 $4.07 $2.83 

Third Quarter

 6.39 3.61 

Second Quarter

 7.57 4.89 

First Quarter

 5.73 3.82 

2013

      
 
 
 
 

Fourth Quarter

 $3.95 $3.22  $3.95 $3.22 

Third Quarter

 3.30 2.61  3.30 2.61 

Second Quarter

 3.32 2.52  3.32 2.52 

First Quarter

 4.06 2.71  4.06 2.71 

2012

 
 
 
 
 

Fourth Quarter

 $4.48 $2.80 

Third Quarter

 4.44 2.96 

Second Quarter

 4.00 2.74 

First Quarter

 6.69 3.93 

Stockholders

        As of December 31, 2013,2014, there were 9482 holders of record of our common stock. However, a single record stockholder account may represent multiple beneficial owners, including owners of shares in street name accounts. We believe there are approximately 5,000 beneficial owners of our common stock.

Dividends

        We have not paid any dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends in the future will be contingent upon our earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition of our business. Our Secured Credit AgreementFacilities currently precludeslimits the payment of dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

        The table setting forth this information is included in Part III—Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

        None.


Table of Contents

Performance Graph

        The performance graph and table below compare the cumulative total return of our common stock for the period December 31, 20082009 to December 31, 20132014 with the comparable cumulative total returns of the Russell 2000 Index (of which the Company is a component stock) and a peer group which consists of the following tennine companies: AECOM Technology Corp. (ACM), Exponent, Inc. (EXPO), Fluor Corporation (FLR), ICF International, Inc. (ICFI), Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (JEC), KBR, Inc. (KBR), Navigant Consulting, Inc. (NCI), Tutor Perini Corp. (TPC), and Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Our peer group previously included URS Corp., however, due to their acquisition by AECOM in October 2014, they are no longer trading and have been removed from this list.


Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
December 2014

 
 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 

Hill International, Inc. 

 $100.00 $103.69 $82.37 $58.65 $63.30 $61.54 

Russell 2000 Index

  100.00  126.81  121.52  141.42  196.32  205.93 

Peer Group

  100.00  129.46  107.01  120.54  161.34  125.37 

Table of Contents

and URS Corp. (URS). In October 2013, Michael Baker Corp. (BKR) ceased to be a publicly-traded company and was replaced by KBR, Inc. (KBR) for purposes of determining our peer group.

 
 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Hill International, Inc. 

 $100.00 $88.64 $91.90 $73.01 $51.99 $56.11 

Russell 2000 Index

  100.00  127.09  161.17  154.44  179.75  249.53 

New Peer Group

  100.00  97.54  121.38  100.56  113.44  152.23 

Old Peer Group

  100.00  94.91  112.93  91.66  104.30  145.12 

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

        The following is selected financial data from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements for each of the last five years. This data should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements (and related notes) appearing elsewhere in this report and with


Table of Contents

Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". The data presented below is in thousands, except for earnings (loss) per share data.


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009  2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 

Income Statement Data:

                      

Consulting fee revenue

 $512,085 $417,598 $399,254 $382,099 $364,010  $575,805 $512,085 $417,598 $399,254 $382,099 

Reimbursable expenses

 64,596 63,183 102,202 69,659 57,772  64,476 64,596 63,183 102,202 69,659 
           

Total revenue

 576,681 480,781 501,456 451,758 421,782  640,281 576,681 480,781 501,456 451,758 
           

Cost of services

 296,055 239,572 227,991 213,349 209,052  328,795 296,055 239,572 227,991 213,349 

Reimbursable expenses

 64,596 63,183 102,202 69,659 57,772  64,476 64,596 63,183 102,202 69,659 
           

Total direct expenses

 360,651 302,755 330,193 283,008 266,824  393,271 360,651 302,755 330,193 283,008 
           

Gross profit

 216,030 178,026 171,263 168,750 154,958  247,010 216,030 178,026 171,263 168,750 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 183,572 172,779 175,312 151,634 136,683  
217,730
 
183,572
 
172,779
 
175,312
 
151,634
 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   (190) (1,503) (8,222)    (190) (1,503)
           

Operating profit (loss)

 32,458 5,247 (3,859) 18,619 26,497  29,280 32,458 5,247 (3,859) 18,619 

Interest and related financing fees, net

 22,864 18,150 7,262 3,144 1,737  30,485 22,864 18,150 7,262 3,144 
           

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 9,594 (12,903) (11,121) 15,475 24,760 

(Loss) earnings before income taxes

 (1,205) 9,594 (12,903) (11,121) 15,475 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 6,043 13,442 (6,186) 481 4,577  8,411 6,043 13,442 (6,186) 481 
           

Net earnings (loss)

 3,551 (26,345) (4,935) 14,994 20,183 

Net (loss) earnings

 (9,616) 3,551 (26,345) (4,935) 14,994 

Less: net earnings—noncontrolling interests

 1,922 1,872 1,082 778 713  1,263 1,922 1,872 1,082 778 
           

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Hill International, Inc.

 $1,629 $(28,217)$(6,017)$14,216 $19,470 
           

Net (loss) earnings attributable to Hill International, Inc.

 $(10,879)$1,629 $(28,217)$(6,017)$14,216 
           

Basic earnings (loss) per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $0.04 $(0.73)$(0.16)$0.36 $0.49 
           

Basic (loss) earnings per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $(0.25)$0.04 $(0.73)$(0.16)$0.36 
           

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding

 39,098 38,500 38,414 39,258 39,659  44,370 39,098 38,500 38,414 39,258 
           
           

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $0.04 $(0.73)$(0.16)$0.36 $0.49 
           

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $(0.25)$0.04 $(0.73)$(0.16)$0.36 
           

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 39,322 38,500 38,414 39,824 40,124  44,370 39,322 38,500 38,414 39,824 
           
           

Table of Contents


 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $30,124 $30,381 $16,716 $17,924 $39,406 

Accounts receivable, net

  194,256  232,011  211,176  197,906  180,856 

Current assets

  257,099  297,893  257,270  231,833  237,466 

Accounts receivable, Libya(1)

  49,659         

Total assets

  464,984  449,102  421,673  407,512  370,851 

Current liabilities

  137,935  151,515  150,135  108,800  104,465 

Total debt

  128,236  133,261  109,456  94,759  74,959 

Stockholders' equity:

                

Hill International, Inc. share of equity

 $154,112 $131,144 $127,546 $154,136 $161,091 

Noncontrolling interests

  8,674  11,887  13,557  18,258  7,005 

Total equity

 $162,786 $143,031 $141,103 $172,394 $168,096 

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $30,381 $16,716 $17,924 $39,406 $30,923 

Accounts receivable, net

  232,011  211,176  197,906  180,856  130,900 

Current assets

  297,893  257,270  231,833  237,466  183,602 

Total assets

  449,102  421,673  407,512  370,851  291,539 

Current liabilities

  151,515  150,135  108,800  104,465  82,657 

Total debt

  133,261  109,456  94,759  74,959  28,244 

Stockholders' equity:

                

Hill International, Inc. share of equity

 $131,144 $127,546 $154,136 $161,091 $155,635 

Noncontrolling interests

  11,887  13,557  18,258  7,005  4,005 
            

Total equity

 $143,031 $141,103 $172,394 $168,096 $159,640 
            
            
(1)
See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for more information.

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

        Our revenue consists of two components: consulting fee revenue ("CFR") and reimbursable expenses. Reimbursable expenses are reflected in equal amounts in both total revenue and total direct expenses. Because these pass-through revenue/costs are subject to significant fluctuation from year to year, we measure the performance of many of our key operating metrics as a percentage of CFR, as we believe that this is a better and more consistent measure of operating performance than total revenue.

        CFR increased $94,487,000,$63,720,000, or 22.6%12.4%, to $512,085,000$575,805,000 in 2013.2014. CFR for the Project Management segment increased $80,370,000$34,913,000, or 8.9%, principally due to increased work in the Middle East, primarily in Oman, Qatar, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.the United Arab Emirates. CFR for the Construction Claims segment increased by $14,117,000$28,807,000, or 24.1%, due primarily to increased work in the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Asia/Pacific.

        Cost of services increased $56,483,000,$32,740,000, or 23.6%11.1%, to $296,055,000$328,795,000 in 20132014 primarily as a result of an increase in employees and other direct expenses related to the additional work in the Middle East.East and Asia/Pacific.

        Gross profit increased $38,004,000,$30,980,000, or 21.3%14.3%, to $216,030,000$247,010,000 in 20132014 due to the increases in CFR. Gross profit as a percent of CFR remained relatively constant atincreased to 42.9% in 2014 from 42.2% in 2013.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $10,793,000,$34,158,000, or 6.2%18.6%, principally due to the unapplied portion of salaries for new staff required forhired to support the increase in CFR.CFR and an increase in indirect salaries in support of that growth. As a percentage of CFR, selling, general and administrative expenses decreasedincreased to 37.8% in 2014 compared to 35.8% in 2013 compared to 41.4% in 2012.2013.

        Operating profit was $29,280,000 in 2014 compared to $32,458,000 in 2013 compared to $5,247,000 in 2012.2013. The increasedecrease in operating profit was primarily due to a combination of increased CFR, loweran increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of CFR resulting from ongoing cost-cutting initiatives and higher utilization rates for professional staff.expenses.

        Income tax expense was $8,411,000 for 2014 compared to $6,043,000 for 2013 compared to $13,442,000 for 2012.2013. The change is primarilyincrease in expense results from increased pretax profits from foreign operations, the resultmix of an increase of $17,707,000tax rates in the valuation allowance againstthose jurisdictions and no offsetting tax benefits arising from the Company's U.S. deferred tax asset in 2012.net operating losses which management believes the Company will not be able to utilize.

        Net incomeloss attributable to Hill was ($10,879,000) in 2014 compared to net earnings of $1,629,000 in 20132013. Diluted loss per common share was ($0.25) in 2014 based upon 44,370,000 diluted common shares outstanding compared to a net loss of ($28,217,000) in 2012. Diluted income per diluted common share wasof $0.04 in 2013 based upon 39,322,000 diluted common shares outstanding compared to a net loss per diluted common share of ($0.73) in 2012 based upon 38,500,000 diluted common shares outstanding.

        We haveThe Company has open but inactive contracts in Libya. During 2013 and early 2014, we received payments of approximately $9,200,000 from our client,with the Libyan Organization for the Development ofand Administrative Centres ("ODAC"),. Due to the civil unrest which commenced in Libya in February 2011, the Company suspended its operations in and demobilized substantially all of its personnel from Libya. From that time until 2013, there was no activity on the contracts and the Company did not receive any payments for the work performed prior to March 2011. During late 2013 and early 2014, Hill received payments of approximately $9,900,000 from ODAC who also posted a letter of credit of approximately $14,000,000 in Hill's favor which expired on June 30, 2014. Management believed that this progress was a positive indication that ODAC intended to fulfill its obligations to Hill.

        In June 2014, a new parliament, the Council of Representatives ("CoR"), was elected and is the internationally recognized government of Libya. Subsequently, fighting broke out between forces loyal to the outgoing General National Congress ("GNC") and the new CoR. The remaining accounts receivable balance with ODAC is now $50,800,000. Since the endGNC reconvened, selected a Prime Minister and seized control of the Libyan civil unrestcapital city of Tripoli. The GNC controls Libya's ministries, central bank and state oil company. In September 2014, the United Nations began talks to reconcile the two factions, but management is not aware that any progress has been made as of


Table of Contents

February 2015. It is our understanding that, government agencies such as ODAC have not been delegated any authority to make payments other than payroll.

        Management has continued its dialogue with representatives of ODAC and understands that ODAC has obtained approval to facilitate immediate payment to Hill once the political situation normalizes. Additionally, in October 2011, theearly 2014, Hill submitted new contracts for additional work upon ODAC's request.

        The Company has sought to recovercurrently believes that recovery of its receivable from ODAC through ongoing negotiationscontinued communications, rather than pursuelegal action, remains appropriate, however, the Company continues to explore its legal rights for payment underoptions, including discussions with outside legal counsel. In the contracts. Theevent that the military and political environment changes significantly in Libya and its surrounding geopolitical regions or there are indications that the Company's continued efforts to negotiate amicably with ODAC are determined have been unsuccessful, the Company will evaluate its options to pursue legal claims and/or assess the carrying amount of this receivable, which could have a significant adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and consolidated financial position.

        Currently, management believes that this courseit has good relationships with the ODAC authorities. However due to the lack of action provides the best likelihood for recovery as it could result in completion of and payment on the existing contracts as well as the potential for the award of new contracts. There is at present noa written agreement understanding or timetable for further payments of Hill's accounts receivable from ODAC or a return to work on Hill's existing contracts. However,contracts, management believes that these payments, along with letters of credit of approximately $14,000,000 posted in our favor by ODAC, were made in good faith and are a positive indication that ODAC intends to satisfy its obligations to Hill. However, the Company cannot predict with certainty when, or if,has reclassified the remaining accounts receivable will be paid byamounting to $49,659,000 to a non-current asset to reflect the Libyan authorities or when work will resume there.uncertainty surrounding the timing of the collection of the receivable. Additionally, management has reclassified from current to other liabilities the accruals for certain taxes and agency fees related to the ODAC contracts amounting to approximately $9,280,000.

        Despite continuing global economic uncertaintyIn 2014, we received $38,042,000 from a secondary offering of our common stock and current limits$120,000,000 from proceeds of a new term loan, the proceeds of which were used to pay down and terminate our 2009 Credit Agreement of $25,500,000 and 2012 Term Loan of $100,000,000. We also entered into new revolving credit facilities. For further information regarding our new term loan, new revolving credit facilities, 2009 Credit Agreement, 2012 Term Loan, please see Note 9 to our consolidated financial credit, westatements.

        We remain optimistic about maintaining our current growth strategy to pursue new business development


Table of Contents

opportunities, continue to take advantage of organic growth opportunities, continue to pursue acquisitions and strengthen our professional resources. Among other things, our optimism stems from the growth of our backlog at December 31, 2013.2014. Our total backlog is a record $1,027,000,000,$1,080,000,000, an increase of $76,000,000$7,000,000 from September 30, 20132014 and $104,000,000$53,000,000 from December 31, 2012.2013. Our 12-month backlog is also a record $394,000,000,$470,000,000, an increase of $12,000,000$13,000,000 from September 30, 20132014 and $12,000,000$76,000,000 from December 31, 2012.2013. These increases are primarily related to significant new work in Iraqthe Middle East and Saudi Arabia.


Non-GAAP Financial Measures

        Regulation G, conditions for use of Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("Non-GAAP") financial measures, and other SEC regulations define and prescribe the conditions for use of certain Non-GAAP financial information. Generally, a Non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's performance, financial position or cash flow that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. We believe earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), in addition to operating profit, net earnings and other GAAP measures, is a useful indicator of our financial and operating performance and our ability to generate cash flows from operations that are available for taxes and capital expenditures. This measure, however, should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute or superior to, operating profit, cash flows, or other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table is a reconciliation of EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation S-K for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):United States.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Hill

 $1,629 $(28,217)$(6,017)

Interest

  22,864  18,150  7,262 

Income taxes

  6,043  13,442  (6,186)

Depreciation and amortization

  10,756  12,430  15,640 
        

EBITDA

 $41,292 $15,805 $10,699 
        
        

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require us to make subjective decisions, assessments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the judgment increases, such judgments become even more subjective. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable and appropriate, actual results may be materially different than estimated.

        We generate revenue primarily from providing professional services to our clients. Revenue is generally recognized upon the performance of services. In providing these services, we may incur reimbursable expenses, which consist of amounts paid to subcontractors and other third parties as well


Table of Contents

as travel and other job related expenses that are contractually reimbursable from clients. We will include reimbursable expenses in computing and reporting our total contract revenue as long as we remain responsible to the client for the fulfillment of the contract and for the overall acceptability of all services provided.


Table of Contents

        We earn our revenue from cost-plus, fixed-price and time-and-materials contracts. If estimated total costs on any contract indicate a loss, we charge the entire estimated loss to operations in the period the loss becomes known. The cumulative effect of revisions to revenue, estimated costs to complete contracts, including penalties, incentive awards, change orders, claims, anticipated losses, and other effects are recorded in the accounting period in which the events indicating a loss are known and the loss can be reasonably estimated. Such revisions could occur at any time and the effects may be material. The majority of our contracts are for work where we bill the client monthly at hourly billing rates. The hourly billing rates are determined by contract terms. For governmental clients, the hourly rates are generally calculated as either (i) a negotiated multiplier of our direct labor costs or (ii) as direct labor costs plus overhead costs plus a negotiated profit percentage. For commercial clients, the hourly rates are generally taken from a standard fee schedule by staff classification or they can be at a negotiated discount from this schedule. In some cases, primarily for foreign work, a fixed monthly staff rate is negotiated rather than an hourly rate. This monthly rate is determined based upon a buildup of direct labor costs plus overhead and profit. We account for these contracts on a time-and-expenses method, recognizing revenue as costs are incurred.

        We account for fixed-price contracts on the "percentage-of-completion" method, wherein revenue is recognized as costs are incurred. Under the percentage-of-completion method for revenue recognition, we estimate the progress towards completion to determine the amount of revenue and profit to be recognized. We generally utilize a cost-to-cost approach in applying the percentage-of-completion method, where revenue is earned in proportion to total costs incurred divided by total costs expected to be incurred.

        Under the percentage-of-completion method, recognition of profit is dependent upon the accuracy of estimates. We have a history of making reasonably dependable estimates of contract revenue, the extent of progress towards completion and contract completion costs on our long-term construction management contracts. However, due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is possible that actual completion costs may vary from estimates.

        We make ongoing estimates relating to the collectibility of our accounts receivable and maintain an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our clients to make required payments. Estimates used in determining accounts receivable allowances are based on specific client account reviews and historical experience of credit losses. We also apply judgment including assessments about changes in economic conditions, concentration of receivables among clients and industries, recent write-off trends, rates of bankruptcy, and credit quality of specific clients. Unanticipated changes in the financial condition of clients, the resolution of various disputes, or significant changes in the economy could impact the reserves required. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $9,530,000$11,142,129 and $10,268,000,$9,530,000, respectively.

        Goodwill is tested annually for impairment in our third fiscal quarter or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that there may be an impairment. We have determined that we have two reporting units, the Project Management unit and the Construction Claims unit. We made that determination based on the similarity of the services provided, the methodologies in delivering our services and the similarity of the client base in each of these units. To determine the fair value of our


Table of Contents

reporting units, we use the market approach and the income approach, weighting the results of each approach.

        Under the market approach, we determine fair value using the public company method and the quoted price method. We utilized a control premium of 30% to arrive at the preliminary fair value for


Table of Contents

each reporting unit, and we applied a weighting of 20% to the preliminary fair value determined by using the public company method. The quoted price method is based upon the market value of the transactions of minority interests in the publicly-traded shares of the Company. We utilized a control premium of 30% to arrive at the preliminary fair value for each reporting unit, and we applied a weighting of 50% to the preliminary fair value determined using the quoted price method.

        Our calculation under the income approach utilizes our internal forecasts. In the income approach (that is, the discounted cash flow method), the projected cash flows reflect the cash flows subsequent to the sale of the reporting unit pursuant to the guidance in ASC 350 and ASC 820. Consistent with applicable literature, we include in projected cash flows any expected improvements in cash flows or other changes that, in our view, a market participant would consider and be willing to pay for (but we exclude any buyer- or entity-specific synergies). The projections are developed by us and are based upon cash flows that maximize reporting unit value by taking into account improvements that controlling-interest holders can make, but minority interest holders cannot make. These improvements include: increasing revenues, reducing operating costs, or reducing non-operating costs such as taxes. The owners of the enterprise may also increase enterprise value by reducing risk; for example, by diversifying the business, improving access to capital, increasing the certainty of cash flows, or optimizing the capital structure.

        We considered the factors listed above when developing the cash flows to support the income approach. Recognizing that due to elements of control incorporated into our reporting units' forecasts, we applied no control premium to our conclusion of value indicated by the discounted cash flows. In determining fair value, we applied a weighting of 30% to the preliminary fair value determined using the income approach.

        With regard to weighting the conclusions rendered by the approaches utilized, we believe that the quoted price method provides the most reliable indication of value (that is, a Level 1 input); therefore, we placed the greatest emphasis upon this method assigning a 50% weighting. We also determined that the value using the discounted cash flow method (to which we assigned a 30% weighting) provided a more reliable indication of value than the public company method (to which we assigned a 20% weighting) with the relative levels of reliability contributing to the weighting accorded to each approach.

        Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgments including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for each reporting unit, the period over which cash flows will occur, and determination of the weighted average cost of capital, among other things. Based on the valuation as of July 1, 2013,2014, the fair values of the Project Management unit and the Construction Claims unit substantially exceeded their carrying values. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect our determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. Changes in future market conditions, our business strategy, or other factors could impact upon the future values of Hill's reporting units, which could result in future impairment charges.

        We amortize other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives and review the long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Determining whether impairment has occurred typically requires various estimates and assumptions, including determining which cash flows are directly related to the potentially impaired asset, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, their amount and the asset's residual value, if any. In turn, measurement of an impairment loss requires a determination of fair


Table of Contents

value, which is based on the best information available. We use internal discounted cash flow estimates, quoted market prices when available and independent appraisals, as appropriate, to determine fair value. We derive the required cash flow estimates from our historical experience and our internal business plans and apply an appropriate discount rate.


Table of Contents

        We make judgments and interpretations based on enacted tax laws, published tax guidance, as well as estimates of future earnings. These judgments and interpretations affect the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and the valuation allowance. We evaluate the deferred tax assets to determine on the basis of objective factors whether the net assets will be realized through future years' taxable income. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates and assessments, additional valuation allowances may be required.

        We will recognize a tax benefit in the financial statements for an uncertain tax position only if management's assessment is that the position is "more likely than not" (i.e., a likelihood greater than 50 percent) to be allowed by the tax jurisdiction based solely on the technical merits of the position. The term "tax position" refers to a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax return that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities for interim or annual periods.

        We recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards. These awards have included stock options and restricted stock grants. While fair value may be readily determinable for awards of stock, market quotes are not available for long-term, nontransferable stock options because these instruments are not traded. We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of options. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including but not limited to stock price volatility, expected life and stock option exercise behavior.

        Estimates are inherent in the assessment of our exposure to insurance claims that fall below policy deductibles and to litigation and other legal claims and contingencies, as well as in determining our liabilities for incurred but not reported insurance claims. Significant judgments by us and reliance on third-party experts are utilized in determining probable and/or reasonably estimable amounts to be recorded or disclosed in our financial statements. The results of any changes in accounting estimates are reflected in the financial statements of the period in which the changes are determined. We do not believe that material changes to these estimates are reasonably likely to occur.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2013

Consulting Fee Revenue ("CFR")

 
 2014 2013 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 

Project Management

 $427,515  74.2%$392,602  76.7%$34,913  8.9%

Construction Claims

  148,290  25.8  119,483  23.3  28,807  24.1 

Total

 $575,805  100.0%$512,085  100.0%$63,720  12.4%

        The increase in CFR included an organic increase of 10.8% primarily in the Middle East and an increase of 1.6% due to the acquisitions of Binnington Copeland & Associates (Pty.) Ltd ("BCA") in May 2013, Collaborative Partners, Inc. ("CPI") in December 2013 and Angus Octan Scotland Ltd. d/b/a Cadogans in October 2014.


Table of Contents

        The increase in Project Management CFR included an organic increase of 7.4% and an increase of 1.5% from the acquisition of CPI. The increase in CFR consisted of a $32,861,000 increase in foreign projects and an increase of $2,052,000 in domestic projects. The increase in foreign Project Management CFR included an increase from new work of $14,049,000 in Oman, $10,788,000 in Qatar and $8,760,000 in Iraq. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $10,062,000 in Brazil primarily due to an economic slowdown in 2014 and a decrease of $4,079,000 in Azerbaijan. The increase in domestic Project Management CFR was due primarily to an increase of $5,868,000 due to the acquisition of CPI, partially offset by a decrease in our Southern U.S. region.

        The increase in Construction Claims CFR was comprised of an organic increase of 21.8% and an increase of 2.3% from the acquisitions of BCA and Cadogans. The organic increase was primarily due to increases in Asia/Pacific, the United Kingdom and the Middle East.

Reimbursable Expenses

 
 2014 2013 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 

Project Management

 $58,927  91.4%$59,915  92.8%$(988) (1.6)%

Construction Claims

  5,549  8.6  4,681  7.2  868  18.5 

Total

 $64,476  100.0%$64,596  100.0%$(120) (0.2)%

        Reimbursable expenses consist of amounts paid to subcontractors and other third parties, and travel and other job-related expenses that are contractually reimbursable from clients. These items are reflected as separate line items in both our total revenue and total direct expenses captions in our consolidated statements of operations. The decrease in Project Management reimbursable expense is primarily due to lower use of subcontractors in our Northeast U.S. region, partially offset by increased subcontractors in Oman and the Western U.S. region. The increase in Construction Claims reimbursable expenses was due primarily to increases in the United Kingdom due to increased use of subcontractors plus increases in other reimbursable expenses associated with the higher work volume.

Cost of Services

 
 2014 2013 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $262,846  79.9% 61.5%$244,003  82.4% 62.2%$18,843  7.7%

Construction Claims

  65,949  20.1  44.5  52,052  17.6  43.6  13,897  26.7 

Total

 $328,795  100.0% 57.1%$296,055  100.0% 57.8%$32,740  11.1%

        Cost of services consists of labor expenses for time charged directly to contracts and non-reimbursable job-related travel and out-of-pocket expenses. The increase in Project Management cost of services is primarily due to an increase in the Middle East in support of increased work there and to a lesser degree to the CPI acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in Brazil.

        The increase in the cost of services for Construction Claims was due primarily to increases in direct costs in the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Asia/Pacific in support of the increased CFR.


Table of Contents

Gross Profit

 
 2014 2013 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $164,669  66.7% 38.5%$148,599  68.8% 37.8%$16,070  10.8%

Construction Claims

  82,341  33.3  55.5  67,431  31.2  56.4  14,910  22.1 

Total

 $247,010  100.0% 42.9%$216,030  100.0% 42.2%$30,980  14.3%

        The increase in Project Management gross profit included an increase of $15,463,000 from international operations, primarily due to increases from the Middle East, principally Oman, Qatar and Iraq, partially offset by decreases in Brazil and Azerbaijan.

        The increase in Construction Claims gross profit was driven by increases in the United Kingdom, the Middle East, South Africa and Asia/Pacific.

        The overall gross profit percentage increased slightly due to higher margins achieved on new work in the Middle East, primarily Oman and Qatar for Project Management.

Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses

 
 2014 2013 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

SG&A Expenses

 $217,730  37.8%$183,572  35.8%$34,158  18.6%

        The significant components of the change in SG&A are as follows:


Table of Contents

        Also, 2013 SG&A had been reduced by $3,693,000 resulting from the elimination in 2013 of a reserve for potential employment tax liabilities for a foreign subsidiary which was later indemnified by the former shareholders of the subsidiary.

Operating Profit:

 
 2014 2013 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $48,516  11.3%$48,682  12.4%$(166) (0.3)%

Construction Claims

  10,996  7.4  12,171  10.2  (1,175) (9.7)

Corporate

  (30,232)    (28,395)    (1,837) 6.5 

Total

 $29,280  5.1%$32,458  6.3%$(3,178) (9.8)%

        The decrease in Project Management operating profit included decreases in Brazil and Europe, partially offset by increases in the Middle East, primarily Oman, Qatar and Iraq.

        The decrease in Construction Claims operating profit was primarily due to decreases in the Middle East and the United Kingdom, partially offset by an increase in Asia/Pacific.

        Corporate expenses increased $1,837,000 which was primarily due to salary increases and information technology costs in support of growing operations overseas. Corporate expenses increased by 6.5% compared to an increase of 12.4% in CFR. Corporate expenses represented 5.3% of CFR in 2014 compared to 5.5% in 2013.

Interest and related financing fees, net

        Interest and related financing fees increased $7,621,000 to $30,485,000 in 2014 as compared with $22,864,000 in 2013, primarily due to $9,338,000 of accelerated interest paid upon the early payoff and termination of the 2012 Term Loan and the write off of $1,482,000 of deferred financing fees related to the early payoff and termination of the Company's 2009 Credit Facility and 2012 Term Loan in September 2014.

Income Taxes

        In 2014, the income tax expense was $8,411,000 compared to an income tax expense of $6,043,000 in 2013. The effective income tax expense rates for 2014 and 2013 were (697.9%) and 63.0%, respectively. The increase in expense results from increased pretax profits from foreign operations, the mix of tax rates in those jurisdictions and no offsetting tax benefits arising from the Company's U.S. net operating losses which management believes the Company will not be able to utilize. The difference in the Company's 2014 effective tax rate compared to the 2013 rate is primarily related to a significant increase in the U.S. pretax loss in 2014 primarily due to the recognition of an additional $10,820,000 of interest expense related to the refinancing and early termination of the Company's former senior credit facility and term loan during the third quarter of 2014. In both years, the Company's effective tax rate is significantly higher than it otherwise would be primarily as a result of not being able to record an income tax benefit related to the U.S. net operating loss plus increases caused by various foreign withholding taxes.

        In 2014, several items materially affected the Company's effective tax rate. The Company realized a net benefit of $2,379,000 primarily from the reversal of prior year's uncertain tax positions based on management's assessment that these items were effectively settled with the appropriate foreign tax authorities. An income tax expense of $552,000 resulted from adjustments to agree the 2013 book amount to the actual amounts reported on the tax returns in foreign jurisdictions.


Table of Contents

        Several items materially affected the Company's effective tax rate during 2013. The Company realized a net benefit of $2,314,000 primarily from the reversal of prior year's uncertain tax position based on management's assessment that these items were effectively settle with the appropriate foreign tax authorities. An income tax expense of $386,000 resulted from adjustments to agree the 2012 book amount to the actual amounts reported on the tax returns, primarily in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the Company recognized higher foreign withholding taxes in 2013 which were partially offset by the true-up of income tax accounts in foreign jurisdictions.

Net (Loss) Earnings Attributable to Hill

        Net loss attributable to Hill International, Inc. for 2014 was ($10,879,000), or ($0.25) per diluted common share based on 44,370,000 diluted common shares outstanding, as compared to net earnings for 2013 of $1,629,000, or $0.04 per diluted common share based upon 39,322,000 diluted common shares outstanding.


Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2012

Consulting Fee Revenue ("CFR")


 2013 2012 Change  2013 2012 Change 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Project Management

 $392,602 76.7%$312,232 74.8%$80,370 25.7% $392,602 76.7%$312,232 74.8%$80,370 25.7%

Construction Claims

 119,483 23.3 105,366 25.2 14,117 13.4  119,483 23.3 105,366 25.2 14,117 13.4 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$94,487 22.6% $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$94,487 22.6%
             
             

        The increase in CFR for 2013 over 2012 was substantially all organic and was primarily due to increased work in the Middle East.

        During 2013, Project Management CFR consisted of a $76,032,000 increase in foreign projects and an increase of $4,338,000 in domestic projects. The increase in foreign Project Management CFR included an increase of $47,826,000 in Oman, $12,321,000 in Qatar, $7,634,000 in Saudi Arabia, $5,478,000 in Iraq and $5,194,000 in Afghanistan. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $8,930,000 in Spain. The increase in domestic Project Management CFR was due primarily to increasesa higher volume of work in our Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions.


Table of Contents

        The increase in Construction Claims CFR was comprised of an organic increase of 11.0% and a 2.4% increase from the acquisition of Binnington Copeland & Associates ("BCA")BCA in May 2013. The organic increase was primarily due to increases in the Middle East and Asia/Pacific, partially offset by a decrease in the United Kingdom.


Reimbursable Expenses


 2013 2012 Change  2013 2012 Change 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

Project Management

 $59,915 92.8%$60,049 95.0%$(134) (0.2)% $59,915 92.8%$60,049 95.0%$(134) (0.2)%

Construction Claims

 4,681 7.2 3,134 5.0 1,547 49.4  4,681 7.2 3,134 5.0 1,547 49.4 
             

Total

 $64,596 100.0%$63,183 100.0%$1,413 2.2% $64,596 100.0%$63,183 100.0%$1,413 2.2%
             
             

Table of Contents

        Reimbursable expenses consist of amounts paid to subcontractors and other third parties, and travel and other job-related expenses that are contractually reimbursable from clients. These items are reflected as separate line items in both our revenue and cost of services captions in our consolidated statements of operations. The increase in Construction Claims reimbursable expenses was due primarily to increases in the Middle East and Asia/Pacific due to subcontractors and other reimbursable expenses associated with the increased work volume.


Cost of Services


 2013 2012 Change  2013 2012 Change 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
   
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $244,003 82.4% 62.2%$192,592 80.4% 61.7%$51,411 26.7% $244,003 82.4% 62.2%$192,592 80.4% 61.7%$51,411 26.7%

Construction Claims

 52,052 17.6 43.6 46,980 19.6 44.6 5,072 10.8  52,052 17.6 43.6 46,980 19.6 44.6 5,072 10.8 
                 

Total

 $296,055 100.0% 57.8%$239,572 100.0% 57.4%$56,483 23.6% $296,055 100.0% 57.8%$239,572 100.0% 57.4%$56,483 23.6%
                 
                 

        Cost of services consists of labor expenses for time charged directly to contracts and non-reimbursable job-related travel and out-of-pocket expenses.

        The increase in Project Management cost of services is primarily due to increases in the Middle East in support of increased work.

        The increase in the cost of services for Construction Claims was due primarily to increases in direct costcosts in the Middle East, Asia/Pacific and South Africa (due to the BCA acquisition), and Asia/Pacific, partially offset by decreasesa decrease in the United Kingdom.


Gross Profit


 2013 2012 Change  2013 2012 Change 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
   
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $148,599 68.8% 37.8%$119,640 67.2% 38.3%$28,959 24.2% $148,599 68.8% 37.8%$119,640 67.2% 38.3%$28,959 24.2%

Construction Claims

 67,431 31.2 56.4 58,386 32.8 55.4 9,045 15.5  67,431 31.2 56.4 58,386 32.8 55.4 9,045 15.5 
                 

Total

 $216,030 100.0% 42.2%$178,026 100.0% 42.6%$38,004 21.3% $216,030 100.0% 42.2%$178,026 100.0% 42.6%$38,004 21.3%
                 
                 

Table of Contents

        The increase in Project Management gross profit included an increase of $26,421,000 from international operations, primarily due to increases from the Middle East, principally Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Afghanistan.

        The increase in Construction Claims gross profit was driven by an increase of $4,245,000 in the Middle East, $3,430,000 in Asia/Pacific and $1,571,000 in South Africa and $3,430,000 in Asia/Pacific, partially offset by a decrease of $1,357,000 in the United Kingdom.

        The overall gross profit percentage declined slightly due to an increase in the mix of work towards the Project Management group which generally has lower gross margin percentages than the Construction Claims group.


Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses


 2013 2012 Change  2013 2012 Change 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

  
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
   
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

SG&A Expenses

 $183,572 35.8%$172,779 41.4%$10,793 6.2% $183,572 35.8%$172,779 41.4%$10,793 6.2%
             
             

        As a percentage of CFR, SG&A expense decreased to 35.8% in 2013 compared to 41.4% in 2012.

        The significant components of the change in SG&A are as follows:


Table of Contents


Operating Profit:


 2013 2012 Change  2013 2012 Change 

 (dollars in thousands)
  (dollars in thousands)
 

  
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
   
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $48,682 12.4%$23,273 7.5%$25,409 109.2% $48,682 12.4%$23,273 7.5%$25,409 109.2%

Construction Claims

 12,171 10.2 8,071 7.7 4,100 50.8  12,171 10.2 8,071 7.7 4,100 50.8 

Corporate

 (28,395)   (26,097)   (2,298) 8.8  (28,395)   (26,097)   (2,298) 8.8 
             

Total

 $32,458 6.3%$5,247 1.3%$27,211 518.6% $32,458 6.3%$5,247 1.3%$27,211 518.6%
             
             

        The increase in Project Management operating profit included an increase of $24,094,000 in the Middle East, primarily Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Afghanistan.


Table of Contents

        The increase in Construction Claims operating profit was primarily due to increases of $2,023,000 in the Middle East and $3,304,000 in Asia/Pacific, partially offset by a decrease of $1,020,000 in the United Kingdom.

        Corporate expenses increased $2,298,000 primarily due to increases in indirect labor, stockshare-based compensation, travel cost, information technology and depreciation in support of expanded operations overseas.


Interest and related financing fees, net

        Interest and related financing fees increased $4,714,000 to $22,864,000 in 2013 as compared with $18,150,000 in 2012, primarily due to higher levels of debt outstanding and higher interest rates. Included in interest expense in 2013 is a non-cash charge of $7,954,000$7,955,000 compared to $1,520,000 in 2012 attributable to the accretion of the Term Loan.


Income Taxes

        In 2013, the income tax expense was $6,043,000 compared to an income tax expense of $13,442,000 in 2012. The effective income tax expense rates for 2013 and 2012 were 63.0% and (104.2%), respectively. The increase in the Company's effective tax rate during the year was primarily a result of recording a valuation allowance on the net U.S. deferred tax asset of $17,700,000 in 2012 with a consolidated pre-tax loss. In 2013, the Company required an increase in the valuation allowance related to the increase in the net U.S. deferred tax asset while generating consolidated pre-tax income.

        The valuation allowance primarily relates to the U.S. federal and state net operating losses of $63,365,000 and $66,472,000, respectively. The losses were generated in fiscal years 2010 through 2013. The primary reason for recording the valuation allowance was due to management's belief that it is more likely than not that the Company will not be able to utilize its U.S. deferred tax assets in the foreseeable future.

        In 2013, several items materially affected the Company's effective tax rate. The Company realized a net benefit of $2,314,000 primarily from the reversal of prior year's uncertain tax positions based on management's assessment that these items were effectively settled with the appropriate foreign tax authorities. An income tax expense of $386,000 resulted from adjustments to agree the 2012 book amount to the actual amounts reported on the tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the Company recognized higher foreign withholding taxes in 2013 which were partially offset by the true up of income tax accounts in foreign jurisdictions.


Table of Contents

        Several items materially affected the Company's effective tax rate during 2012. The Company realized a benefit from the reversal of prior year's uncertain tax position amounting to $350,000 due to the expiration of the statute of limitations upon filing of certain income tax returns in a foreign jurisdiction. An income tax benefit of $666,000 resulted from adjustments to agree the 2011 book amount to the actual amounts reported on the tax returns, primarily in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the Company recognized an income tax expense related to withholding tax in the amount of $573,000 primarily related to foreign operations and an income tax expense of $804,000 related to potential prior year tax assessments of certain foreign subsidiaries.


Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Hill

        The net earnings attributable to Hill International, Inc. for 2013 waswere $1,629,000, or $0.04 per diluted common share, based on 39,322,000 diluted common shares outstanding, as compared to a net loss for 2012 of ($28,217,000), or ($0.73) per diluted common share based upon 38,500,000 diluted common shares outstanding.


Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2011

Consulting Fee Revenue ("CFR")

 
 2012 2011 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 

Project Management

 $312,232  74.8%$290,787  72.8%$21,445  7.4%

Construction Claims

  105,366  25.2  108,467  27.2  (3,101) (2.9)
               

Total

 $417,598  100.0%$399,254  100.0%$18,344  4.6%
               
               

        The increase in CFR for 2012 over 2011 was comprised of an organic increase of 2.7% primarily due to increased work in the Middle East and an increase of 1.9% from the acquisition of Engineering S.A. in Brazil.

        During 2012, Project Management CFR included an organic increase of 4.7% primarily from the Middle East plus an increase of 2.7% due to the acquisition of Engineering S.A. The increase in Project Management CFR consisted of a $19,677,000 increase in foreign projects and an increase of $1,768,000 in domestic projects. The increase in foreign Project Management CFR included an increase of $16,815,000 in Saudi Arabia, $4,638,000 in Egypt and $4,339,000 in Afghanistan. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $8,208,000 in Libya where work was suspended in February 2011 due to political unrest and $4,327,000 in Spain. The increase in domestic Project Management CFR was due primarily to increases in our Mid-Atlantic and Western regions.

        The decrease in Construction Claims CFR was all organic and primarily resulted from decreases in Australia, Europe and the Middle East where several large assignments were completed, partially offset by increases in the United Kingdom and the United States.


Reimbursable Expenses

 
 2012 2011 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 

Project Management

 $60,049  95.0%$98,928  96.8%$(38,879) (39.3)%

Construction Claims

  3,134  5.0  3,274  3.2  (140) (4.3)
               

Total

 $63,183  100.0%$102,202  100.0%$(39,019) (38.2)%
               
               

Table of Contents

        Reimbursable expenses consistNon-GAAP Financial Measures

        Item 10(e) of amounts paid to subcontractorsRegulation S-K, "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Commission Filings," and other third parties,SEC regulations define and travelprescribe the conditions for use of certain financial information that is not recognized by generally accepted accounting principles. Generally, a Non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company's performance, financial position or cash flow that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. We believe earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), in addition to operating profit, net earnings and other job-related expensesGAAP measures, is a useful indicator of our financial and operating performance and our ability to generate cash flows from operations that are contractually reimbursable from clients. These items are reflectedavailable for taxes and capital expenditures. This measure, however, should be considered in addition to, and not as separate line itemsa substitute or superior to, operating profit, cash flows, or other measures of financial performance prepared in both our revenueaccordance with GAAP. The following table is a reconciliation of EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation S-K for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and cost of services captions in our consolidated statements of operations. The decrease in Project Management reimbursable expenses was due primarily to decreased use of subcontractors of $41,260,000 primarily in our Northeast region.


Cost of Services
2012 (in thousands):


 2012 2011 Change  Years Ended December 31, 

 (dollars in thousands)
  2014 2013 2012 

  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $192,592 80.4% 61.7%$178,336 78.2% 61.3%$14,256 8.0%

Construction Claims

 46,980 19.6 44.6 49,655 21.8 45.8 (2,675) (5.4)
                 

Net (loss) earnings attributable to Hill

 $(10,879)$1,629 $(28,217)

Interest

 30,485 22,864 18,150 

Income taxes

 8,411 6,043 13,442 

Depreciation and amortization

 9,823 10,756 12,430 

Total

 $239,572 100.0% 57.4%$227,991 100.0% 57.1%$11,581 5.1%
                 

EBITDA

 $37,840 $41,292 $15,805 
                 

        Cost of services consists of labor expenses for time charged directly to contracts and non-reimbursable job-related travel and out-of-pocket expenses. The increase in Project Management cost of services is primarily due to increases in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Egypt and our U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Western regions in support of the increased revenue in those areas and due to the acquisition of Engineering S.A., partially offset by decreases in Libya and Spain.

        The decrease in the cost of services for Construction Claims was due primarily to decreases in direct cost in Australia, the Middle East and Europe, partially offset by increases in the United Kingdom and the United States.


Gross Profit

 
 2012 2011 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management

 $119,640  67.2% 38.3%$112,451  65.7% 38.7%$7,189  6.4%

Construction Claims

  58,386  32.8  55.4  58,812  34.3  54.2  (426) (0.7)
                     

Total

 $178,026  100.0% 42.6%$171,263  100.0% 42.9%$6,763  3.9%
                     
                     

        The increase in Project Management gross profit included an increase of $5,971,000 from international operations including increases of $8,885,000 from the Middle East, primarily Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan, $3,197,000 from Brazil and $2,926,000 from Egypt, partially offset by decreases of $4,636,000 from Libya and $3,061,000 from Spain.

        The decrease in Construction Claims gross profit was driven by a decrease of $2,412,000 from Australia where some large assignments were completed, partially offset by an increase in $1,801,000 from the United Kingdom.


Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses

 
 2012 2011 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

SG&A Expenses

 $172,779  41.4%$175,312  43.9%$(2,533) (1.4)%
               
               

Table of Contents

        The decrease in SG&A included decreases of $7,523,000, partially offset by an increase of $4,990,000 from Engineering S.A. which was acquired in February 2011.

        The significant components of the change in SG&A are as follows:


Operating Profit (Loss):

 
 2012 2011 Change 
 
 (dollars in thousands)
 
 
  
 % of
CFR
  
 % of
CFR
  
  
 

Project Management before

                   

equity in earnings of affiliates

 $23,273  7.5%$17,673  6.0%$5,600  31.7%

Equity in earnings of affiliates

      190  0.1  (190) (100.0)
               

Total Project Management

  23,273  7.5  17,863  6.1  5,410  30.3 

Construction Claims

  8,071  7.7  9,488  8.7  (1,417) (14.9)

Corporate

  (26,097)    (31,210)    5,113  (16.4)
                 

Total

 $5,247  1.3%$(3,859) (1.0)%$9,106  N.M.%
                 
                 

        The increase in Project Management operating profit primarily included an increase of $7,381,000 in the Middle East, primarily Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan, $5,204,000 in the United States and $1,875,000 in Egypt. The increases were partially offset by a decrease in operating profit of $4,869,000 in Libya and $2,956,000 in Romania.

        The decrease in Construction Claims operating profit was primarily due to a decrease of $3,626,000 in Australia and $1,417,000 in the Middle East, partially offset by an increase of $2,735,000 in the United Kingdom.

        Corporate expenses decreased $5,113,000 primarily due to decreases of $1,675,000 in indirect labor and travel expenses as a result of cost-cutting initiatives, a reserve of $1,600,000 in 2011 related to a Saudi Arabian joint venture and a decrease of $1,004,000 in legal fees.


Table of Contents


Interest and related financing fees, net

        Interest and related financing fees, net increased $10,888,000 to $18,150,000 in 2012 as compared with $7,262,000 in 2011, primarily due to higher levels of debt outstanding and higher interest rates, including forbearance agreement fees, default fees, amended Credit Agreement fees, refinancing fees and related legal and advisory fees amounting to $10,775,000 for 2012 compared to $1,076,000 in 2011.


Income Taxes

        In 2012, the income tax expense was $13,442,000 compared to an income tax benefit of ($6,186,000) in 2011. The effective income tax expense rates for 2012 and 2011 were (104.2%) and 55.6%, respectively. The change in the Company's effective tax rate during the year was primarily a result of recording a valuation allowance on the net U.S. deferred tax asset of $17,700,000.

        The valuation allowance primarily relates to the U.S. federal and state net operating losses of $38,400,000 and $41,600,000, respectively. The losses were generated in fiscal years 2010 through 2012. The primary reason for recording the valuation allowance was due to the inability of the Company's majority owned subsidiary, HillStone International, LLC to finalize the contracts that were projected to commence in 2012. In 2011 the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $6,932,000 related to net operating losses from U.S. operations.

        In addition, several items materially affected the Company's effective tax rate during 2012. The Company realized a benefit from the reversal of prior year's uncertain tax position amounting to $350,000 due to the expiration of the statute of limitations upon filing of certain income tax returns in a foreign jurisdiction. An income tax benefit of $666,000 resulted from adjustments to agree the 2011 book amount to the actual amounts reported on the tax returns, primarily in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the Company recognized an income tax expense related to withholding tax in the amount of $573,000 primarily related to foreign operations and an income tax expense of $804,000 related to potential prior year tax assessments of certain foreign subsidiaries.

        In 2011, four items materially affected the Company's effective tax rate. The Company realized substantial benefits from the reversal of a prior year's uncertain tax position amounting to $1,515,000 due to the expiration of the statute of limitations upon the filing of certain income tax returns and the favorable resolution of a Kazakhstan withholding tax issue. An income tax benefit of $347,000 resulted from adjustments to agree the 2010 book amount to the actual amounts reported on the tax returns, primarily related to foreign operations. In addition, a tax benefit was recognized in the amount of $18,000 representing the tax effect on unrealized foreign exchange losses generated in the United Kingdom which are included as a deduction on the local tax returns. These benefits were offset by an increase in the reserves for uncertain tax positions of $609,000, related primarily to uncertain tax positions of foreign operations. Excluding these items our effective tax rate would have been 44.5% in 2011.


Net Loss Attributable to Hill

        The net loss attributable to Hill International, Inc. for 2012 was ($28,217,000), or ($0.73) per diluted common share based on 38,500,000 diluted common shares outstanding, as compared to a net loss for 2011 of ($6,017,000), or ($0.16) per diluted common share based upon 38,414,000 diluted common shares outstanding.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

        As a result of the worldwide financial situation in recent years as well as the political unrest in Libya, we have had to rely more heavily on borrowings under our various credit facilities to provide funding for our operations. On May 23, 2013, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to our


Table of Contents

Credit Agreement which permitted the Company to enter into an agreement with Qatar National Bank for the issuance of letters of credit ("LCs") not to exceed $17,000,000, increased the limit on LCs available to the Company's foreign subsidiaries who are not loan parties from $4,000,000 to $11,800,000 and permits the Company to provide up to $20,000,000 as cash collateral for letters of credit and performance bonds. On the same day in May 2013, the Company entered into a First Amendment to the Term Loan Agreement. The First Amendment contains identical provisions as those in the Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of our recent refinancing, credit facilities and Term Loan.term loan. At December 31, 2013,2014, our primary sources of liquidity consisted of $30,381,000$30,124,000 of cash and cash equivalents, of which $2,573,000$11,000 was on deposit in the U.S. and $27,808,000$30,113,000 was on deposit in foreign locations, and $15,552,000$22,025,000 of available borrowing capacity under our various credit facilities. Approximately $14,000,000We estimate that approximately $16,252,000 of the cash on deposit in foreign locations is required for working capital needs in those countries and the currency limitations related to Libyan dinars. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to support the reasonably anticipated cash needs of our operations over the next year. Significanttwelve months. Also, significant unforeseen events, such as termination or cancellation of major contracts and/or acts of terrorism or political unrest in or around the various areas in which we operate, could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations. If market opportunities exist, we may choose to undertake financing actions to further enhance our liquidity, which could include our ability to borrow additional funds under our credit agreements, obtaining new bank debt or raising funds through capital market transactions; however, our ability to borrow additional funds or obtain letterstransactions. See "Sources of credit is limited by the terms of our Credit Agreement.Additional Capital" for further information.


Uncertainties With Respect to Operations in Libya

        We have open but inactive contracts in Libya.with the Libyan Organization for the Development and Administrative Centres ("ODAC"). Due to the politicalcivil unrest which commenced in Libya in February 2011, we suspended our operations in and demobilized substantially all of our personnel from Libya.

        During From that time until 2013, there was no activity on the past several months, the Company's accounts receivable related tocontracts and we did not receive any payments for the work performed prior to March 2011 pursuant to contracts with the Libyan government was reduced by approximately $3,100,000. The reduction consisted of a cash payment by the Libyan Organization for the Development of Administrative Centres ("ODAC") of approximately 3,000,000 Libyan dinars ("LYD") ($2,400,000) that was made directly to Hill2011. During late 2013 and a cash payment of approximately LYD 800,000 ($700,000) that was made by ODAC to the Libyan tax authorities on Hill's behalf. At December 31, 2013, the remaining accounts receivable outstanding amounted to approximately $57,000,000.

        During Februaryearly 2014, the Companywe received additional payments of approximately $6,100,000 consisting$9,900,000 from ODAC who also posted a letter of credit of approximately 200,000 pounds sterling ($300,000), approximately LYD 2,100,000 ($1,700,000) and $4,100,000$14,000,000 in U.S. dollars.

        In connection with the work performed in Libya, our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 included the following amounts; we have also reflected the February 2014 collections:

 
 2014 2013 2012 2011 

Consulting fee revenue

 $ $ $ $8,206,000 

Gross profit

 $ $ $ $4,576,000 

Collections received during the year

 $6,100,000 $3,100,000 $ $7,748,000 

        The LYD 3,000,000 cash payment made in 2013 directly to Hill is not freely convertible into other currencies. As a result, this cash remains in Hill's Libyan bank account. Since the end of the Libyan civil unrest in October 2011, the Company has sought to recover its receivable from ODAC through ongoing negotiations rather than pursue its legal rights for payment under the contracts. The Company believesfavor which expired on June 30, 2014. We believed that this course of action provides the best likelihood for recovery as it could result in completion of and payment on the existing contracts as well as the potential for the award of newprogress was a positive indication that ODAC intended to fulfill its obligations to us.


Table of Contents

contracts. There        In June 2014, a new parliament, the Council of Representatives ("CoR"), was elected and is at present no agreement,the internationally recognized government of Libya. Subsequently, fighting broke out between forces loyal to the outgoing General National Congress ("GNC") and the new CoR. The GNC reconvened, selected a Prime Minister and seized control of the capital city of Tripoli. The GNC controls Libya's ministries, central bank and state oil company. In September 2014, the United Nations began talks to reconcile the two factions, but we are not aware that any progress has been made as of early March 2015. It is our understanding or timetablethat government agencies such as ODAC have not been delegated any authority to make payments other than payroll.

        We have continued our dialogue with representatives of ODAC and understand that ODAC has obtained approval to facilitate immediate payment to us once the political situation normalizes. Additionally, in early 2014, we submitted new contracts for further paymentsadditional work upon ODAC's request.

        We currently believe that recovery of Hill's accountsthe receivable from ODAC or a returnthrough continued communications, rather than legal action, remains appropriate, however, we continue to work on Hill's existing contracts. However, management believes that these payments, alongexplore our legal options, including discussions with letters of credit of approximately $14,000,000 posted in our favor by ODAC, were made in good faith and are a positive indication that ODAC intends to satisfy its obligations to Hill. However, the Company cannot predict with certainty when, or if, the remaining accounts receivable will be paid by the Libyan authorities or when work will resume there.outside legal counsel. In the event that the military and political environment changes significantly in Libya and its surrounding geopolitical regions or there are indications that our continued efforts to negotiate amicably with ODAC are determined to have been unsuccessful, we do not realize any further payments, therewill evaluate our options to pursue legal claims and/or assess the carrying amount of this receivable, which could behave a significant adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and consolidated financial position. See Note 4

        Currently, we believe that we have good relationships with the ODAC authorities. However due to the consolidated financial statements.lack of a written agreement or timetable for further payments of the accounts receivable from ODAC or a return to work on our existing contracts, we have reclassified the remaining accounts receivable amounting to $49,659,000 to a non-current asset to reflect the uncertainty surrounding the timing of the collection of the receivable. Additionally, we have reclassified from current to other liabilities the accruals for certain taxes and agency fees related to the ODAC contracts amounting to approximately $9,280,000.


Additional Capital Requirements

        On February 28, 2011, ourOur subsidiary, Hill International (Spain), S.A. ("Hill Spain"), acquiredowns an indirect 60%72% interest in Engineering S.A. ("ESA"), a firm located in Brazil, for cash amounting to 22,200,000 Brazilian Reais ("BR") (approximately $13,392,000 on that date). Minimum additional payments were paid on April 30, 2012 and 2013 in the amount of BR6,624,000 (approximately $3,508,000) and BR11,372,000 (approximately $5,095,000). Under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay BR5,000,000 (approximately $3,016,000) in addition to the minimum payments.

Brazil. ESA's shareholders entered into an agreement whereby the minority shareholders have a right to compel ("ESA Put Option") Hill Spain to purchase any or all of their shares during the period from February 28, 2014 to February 28, 2021. Hill Spain also has the right to compel ("ESA Call Option") the minority shareholders to sell any or all of their shares during the same time period. The purchase price for such shares shall be seven times the earnings before interest and taxes for ESA's most recently ended fiscal year, net of any financial debt plus excess cash multiplied by a percentage which the shares to be purchased bear to the total number of shares outstanding at the time of purchase, but in the event the ESA Call Option is exercised by Hill Spain, the purchase price shall be increased by five percent. The ESA Put Option and the ESA Call Option must be made within three months after the audited financial statements of ESA have been completed.

        On October 31, 2014, our subsidiary Hill International (UK) Ltd. acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Angus Octan Scotland Ltd., which included its subsidiary companies Cadogan Consultants Ltd., Cadogan Consult Ltd. and Cadogan International Ltd. (collectively, "Cadogans"). Total consideration for the acquisition was £2,719,000 (approximately $4,350,000 at the date of acquisition). Cash payments of £2,000,000 ($3,200,000) were made during 2014. The remaining payouts consist of a cash payment of £519,000 ($830,000) to be paid on October 31, 2015 plus a potential earn out based upon Cadogans' average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization


Table of Contents

("EBITDA") for the two-year period ending on October 31, 2016 (which amount shall not be less than £0 nor more than £200,000).

Sources of Additional Capital

        We have an effective registration statement on Form S-3 on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") which registeredSEC to register 20,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance and sale by us at various times in the future. The proceeds, if any, will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, subject to the restrictions of our amendedSecured Credit Agreement.Facilities. We cannot predict the amount of proceeds from those future sales, if any, or whether there will be a market for our common stock at the time of any such offering or offerings to the public.

        In addition, we have an effective registration statement on Form S-4 on file with the SEC which registered 8,000,000to register 20,000,000 shares of our common stock, for use in future acquisitions.which includes 6,438,923 shares of our common stock registered under a previous Form S-4. During 2013, we issued 1,389,769 shares in connection with our acquisitions of BCA and CPI. During 2014, we issued 171,308 shares in connection with certain additional consideration for CPI. We willexpect to issue additional shares of our common stock in connection with certain additional consideration and contingent consideration for those two companies. However, weBCA and CPI. We cannot predict whether, in the future, we will offer these shares to potential sellers of businesses or assets we might consider acquiring or whether these shares will be acceptable as consideration by any potential sellers.

        At December 31, 2014, we had $11,939,000 of available borrowing capacity under our domestic credit agreement and $10,086,000 of available borrowing capacity under our various foreign credit agreements.

        We also have relationships with other foreign banks for the issuance of letters of credit, letters of guarantee and performance bonds in a variety of foreign currencies. At December 31, 2014, we had approximately $53,644,000 of availability under these relationships.

We cannot provide any assurance that any other sources of financing will be available, or if available, that the financing will be on terms acceptable to us.


Cash Flow Activity During the Year Ended December 31, 2013
2014

        For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, our cash and cash equivalents increaseddecreased by $13,665,000$257,000 to $30,381,000.$30,124,000. This compares to a net decreaseincrease in cash and cash equivalents of $1,208,000$13,665,000 during the


Table of Contents

prior year. Cash provided by operations was $21,433,000,$6,305,000, cash used in investing activities was $14,826,000($11,978,000) and cash provided by financing activities was $15,961,000.$9,398,000. We also experienced a decrease in cash of $8,903,000$3,982,000 from the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Operating Activities

        Our operations generated cash of $21,433,000$6,305,000 in 2013.2014. This compares to cash generated of $21,433,000 in 2013 and cash used of ($6,471,000) in 2012 and ($10,470,000) in 2011.2012. We had a net incomeloss in 2014 amounting to ($9,616,000), net earnings of $3,551,000 in 2013 amounting to $3,551,000,and a net loss of ($26,345,000) in 2012 and a net loss of ($4,935,000) in 2011.2012. Depreciation and amortization was $9,823,000 in 2014 compared to $10,756,000 in 2013 compared toand $12,430,000 in 2012 and $15,640,000 in 2011;2012; the decrease in this category is due to the full amortization of the shorter-lived intangible assets of companies which we acquired over the last several years. We had deferred tax benefit of ($2,171,000)2,241,000) in 20132014 primarily due to several minor temporary differences in foreign jurisdictions.

        Cash held in restricted accounts as collateral for the issuance of performance and advance payment bonds and letters of credit at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $16,007,000 and 2012 were $18,506,000, and $21,226,000, respectively.


Table of Contents

        AverageExcluding the ODAC receivable, average days sales outstanding ("DSO") at December 31, 20132014 was 12686 days compared to 13091 days at December 31, 20122013 and 13490 days at December 31, 2011.2012. DSO is a measure of our ability to collect our accounts receivable and is calculated by dividing the total of the period-end billed accounts receivable balance by average daily revenue (i.e., revenue for the quarter divided by 90 days). The decrease in DSO in 20132014 was because the increase in our revenue, due to the ramp-up on new work in the Middle East, outpaced the growth in our accounts receivable. The overall level of DSO continues to be affected by the receivable due from the Libyan Organization for the Development of Administrative Centres ("ODAC") which was approximately $57,000,000 at December 31, 2013. This situation has hadto a detrimental effect on our operating cash flows over the last two years, and we have had to rely on borrowings under our Credit Agreement and Term Loan to support our operations. Excluding the ODAC receivable, the DSO would have been 91 days at December 31, 2013, 90 days at December 31, 2012 and 93 days at December 31, 2011.more favorable collection experience. Also, the age of our receivables is adversely affected by the timing of payments from our clients in Europe, Africa (other than Libya) and the Middle East, which have historically been slower than payments from clients in other geographic regions of the Company's operations.

        Although we continually monitor our accounts receivable, we manage our operating cash flows by managing the working capital accounts in total, rather than by individual elements. The primary elements of our working capital are accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and deferred revenue. Accounts receivable consist of billing to our clients for our consulting fees and other job-related costs. Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of prepayments for various selling, general and administrative costs, such as insurance, rent, maintenance, etc. Accounts payable consist of obligations to third parties relating primarily to costs incurred for specific engagements, including pass-through costs such as subcontractor costs. Deferred revenue consists of payments received from clients in advance of work performed.

        From year to year, the components of our working capital accounts may reflect significant changes. The changes are due primarily to the timing of cash receipts and payments with our working capital accounts combined with increases in our receivables and payables relative to the increase in our overall business, as well as our acquisition activity.

Investing Activities

        Net cash used in investing activities was $14,826,000.($11,978,000). We used $12,062,000 to pay the liability for the Hill Spain equity interest and $3,764,000($5,721,000) to purchase computers, office equipment, furniture and


Table fixtures to support the growth in our business. We used ($3,556,000) to acquire an additional 12% interest in ESA. We used ($2,701,000) for the acquisition of Contents

fixtures. We received $964,000 from our acquisitionsCadogans, net of Binnington Copeland & Associates and Collaborative Partners, Inc. which were$499,000 acquired using shares of our common stock.in the transaction.

Financing Activities

        Net cash provided by financing activities was $9,398,000. During the year, we made net payments on our revolving credit agreements amounting to $14,133,000. We received $21,084,000$38,042,000 from borrowings undera follow-on offering of our common stock and $120,000,000 from proceeds of a new term loan, the proceeds of which were used to pay down and terminate our 2009 Credit Agreement.Agreement in the amount of $25,500,000 and 2012 Term Loan in the amount of $100,000,000. In connection with our new term loan and revolving credit agreements, we paid ($10,065,000) for financing fees and expenses. For further information regarding our Secured Credit Facilities, including our new Term Loan and Revolving Credit Agreements, our 2009 Credit Agreement and our 2012 Term Loan, please see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements. We also received $158,000$1,229,000 from the exercise of stock options and purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We made payments on notes payable related to the acquisition of Engineering S.A. amounted to $5,095,000. Payments on other notes payable amounted to $167,000. Due to banks decreased $19,000 due to a lower level of payments which were disbursed but not immediately funded by the bank.


RecentNew Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncement

        In February 2013,On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASUAccounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-2,2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends the Comprehensive Income Topic of the ASC. The ASU requires companies to report either on the income statement or disclose in the footnotes to the financial statement the effects on earnings from items that are reclassified out of the category of shareholder equity called accumulated other comprehensive income. The adjustments will consist of amounts from the fiscal period covered by the financial statements. Companies will also have to make cross references to other disclosures requiredreplace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue for other line items usedthe transfer of goods or services equal to adjust earnings.the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. The FASB wants this requirement applied to amounts that are initially transferred to another balance sheet item before being entered as an adjustment to earnings.


Table of Contents

ASU requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. The ASU waswill be effective for interim and annual periods commencing after December 15, 2012.2016 and allows for both retrospective and prospective methods of adoption. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company adoptedis in the process of determining the method of adoptions and assessing the impact of this ASU effective January 1, 2013. Adoption of the ASU did not affect the Company'son its consolidated results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.statements.


Quarterly Fluctuations

        Our operating results vary from period to period as a result of the timing of projects and assignments. We do not believe that our business is seasonal.


Inflation

        Although we are subject to fluctuations in the local currencies of the counties in which we operate, we do not believe that inflation will have a significant effect on our results of operations or our financial position.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

(in thousands)
 Total(4) 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 - 2018 2019 and later  Total(1) 2015 2016 - 2017 2018 - 2019 2020 and
later
 

Performance and advance

           

payment bonds(1)

 $47,698 $20,646 $21,156 $1,722 $4,174 

Performance bonds(2)

 $34,492 $13,058 $13,857 $1,498 $6,079 

Advance payment bonds(2)

 21,895 6,947 10,904  4,044 

Bid bonds(2)(3)

 6,528 6,528     6,799 6,251  548  

Letters of credit(3)(4)

 17,207 17,207     16,836 16,836    
           

 $71,433 $44,381 $21,156 $1,722 $4,174 
            $80,022 $43,092 $24,761 $2,046 $10,123 
           

(1)
At December 31, 2014, the Company had provided cash collateral amounting to $16,007,000 for certain of these items. That collateral is reflected in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding these arrangements.

(2)
Represents guarantee of service performance bonds issued through international banks required under certain international contracts.

(2)(3)
Represents bid bonds issued through international banks as part of the bidding process for new work to demonstrate our financial strength. These bonds are usually outstanding for short periods.

(3)(4)
Represents letters of credit issued through a domestic bank in support for certain performance, advance payments and bid bonds.

Table of Contents

(4)
At December 31, 2013, the Company had provided cash collateral amounting to $18,506,000 for certain of these items. That collateral is reflected in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.


Contractual Obligations

(in thousands)
 Total 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 - 2018 2019 and later  Total 2015 2016 - 2017 2018 - 2019 2020 and
later
 

Long-term debt obligations

 $133,259 18,974 114,222 63    $128,236 6,361 5,774 2,401 113,700 

Interest expense on notes payable(1)

 29,463 13,766 15,693 4   55,158 9,860 19,200 18,980 7,118 

Operating lease obligations(2)

 36,568 10,577 13,013 7,257 5,721  55,494 12,422 16,808 10,994 15,270 
           

 $199,290 $43,317 $142,928 $7,324 $5,721 
            $238,888 $28,643 $41,782 $32,375 $136,088 
           

(1)
Estimated using the interest rates in effect at December 31, 2013.2014.


Table of Contents

(2)
Represents future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable leases which comprise the majority of the operating lease obligations presented above.leases. The Company expects to fund these commitments with existing cash and cash flow from operations.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        We are exposed to risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates.

Foreign Exchange Rates

        We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk resulting from our operations outside of the U.S. which are denominated in British pounds sterling, Euros, U.A.E. dirhams, Qatari riyal, Omani Rial,rial, Saudi Riyal,riyal, Brazilian Reais,reais, Libyan dinars, Polish Zloty,zloty, Australian dollars as well as other currencies. We do not comprehensively hedge our exposure to currency rate changes; however, we limit exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in most of our contracts through provisions that require client payments to be in currencies corresponding to the currency in which costs are incurred. As a result, we currently do not hedge foreign currency cash flows for contract work performed, although we may do so in the future. The functional currency of our significant foreign operations is the local currency.

Interest Rates

        All of our borrowings under our revolving credit facilities bear interest at variable rates. If market interest rates had changed by 100 basis points, interest expense and our cash flows would have changed by $465,000 and $281,000, respectively.$825,000 each.


Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)


 December 31,
2013
 December 31,
2012
  December 31,
2014
 December 31,
2013
 

Assets

          

Cash and cash equivalents

 $30,381 $16,716  $30,124 $30,381 

Cash—restricted

 15,766 12,091  8,851 15,766 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,530 and $10,268

 232,011 211,176 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $11,142 and $9,530

 194,256 232,011 

Accounts receivable—affiliates

 492 1,260  3,993 492 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 13,078 10,395  15,854 13,078 

Income taxes receivable

 4,460 3,445  2,833 4,460 

Deferred income tax assets

 1,705 2,187  1,188 1,705 
     

Total current assets

 297,893 257,270  257,099 297,893 

Property and equipment, net

 10,613 11,268  11,643 10,613 

Cash—restricted, net of current portion

 2,740 9,135  7,156 2,740 

Accounts receivable—Libya

 49,659  

Retainage receivable

 1,212 3,946  3,300 1,212 

Acquired intangibles, net

 24,964 28,248  19,282 24,964 

Goodwill

 85,853 84,007  80,437 85,853 

Investments

 5,984 8,275  5,083 5,984 

Deferred income tax assets

 13,882 14,426  15,426 13,882 

Other assets

 5,961 5,098  15,899 5,961 
     

Total assets

 $449,102 $421,673  $464,984 $449,102 
     
     

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

          

Due to banks

 $2 $21  $ $2 

Current maturities of notes payable and long-term debt

 18,974 21,769  6,361 18,974 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 92,270 90,306  92,068 92,270 

Income taxes payable

 9,442 6,955  8,689 9,442 

Deferred revenue

 18,203 17,156  20,542 18,203 

Deferred income taxes

 369 101  279 369 

Other current liabilities

 12,255 13,827  9,996 12,255 
     

Total current liabilities

 151,515 150,135  137,935 151,515 

Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current maturities

 114,285 87,666  121,875 114,285 

Retainage payable

 1,017 4,163  2,448 1,017 

Deferred income taxes

 16,732 17,675  14,654 16,732 

Deferred revenue

 16,261 9,652  12,193 16,261 

Other liabilities

 6,261 11,279  13,093 6,261 
     

Total liabilities

 306,071 280,570  302,198 306,071 
     

Commitments and contingencies

          

Stockholders' equity:

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, none issued

      

Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 46,598 shares and 45,097 shares issued at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

 5 5 

Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 56,920 shares and 46,598 shares issued at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

 6 5 

Additional paid-in capital

 136,899 129,913  179,912 136,899 

Retained earnings

 47,038 45,409  36,159 47,038 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 (25,032) (20,015) (33,661) (25,032)
     

 158,910 155,312  182,416 158,910 

Less treasury stock of 6,434 shares at both December 31, 2013 and 2012, at cost

 (27,766) (27,766)
     

Less treasury stock of 6,546 shares at December 31, 2014 and 6,434 shares at December 31, 2013, at cost

 (28,304) (27,766)

Hill International, Inc. share of equity

 131,144 127,546  154,112 131,144 

Noncontrolling interests

 11,887 13,557  8,674 11,887 
     

Total equity

 143,031 141,103  162,786 143,031 
     

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $449,102 $421,673  $464,984 $449,102 
     
     

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Consulting fee revenue

 $512,085 $417,598 $399,254  $575,805 $512,085 $417,598 

Reimbursable expenses

 64,596 63,183 102,202  64,476 64,596 63,183 
       

Total revenue

 576,681 480,781 501,456  640,281 576,681 480,781 
       

Cost of services

 296,055 239,572 227,991  328,795 296,055 239,572 

Reimbursable expenses

 64,596 63,183 102,202  64,476 64,596 63,183 
       

Total direct expenses

 360,651 302,755 330,193  393,271 360,651 302,755 
       

Gross profit

 216,030 178,026 171,263  247,010 216,030 178,026 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 
183,572
 
172,779
 
175,312
  
217,730
 
183,572
 
172,779
 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   (190)
       
���

Operating profit (loss)

 32,458 5,247 (3,859)

Operating profit

 29,280 32,458 5,247 

Interest and related financing fees, net

 
22,864
 
18,150
 
7,262
  
30,485
 
22,864
 
18,150
 
       

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 9,594 (12,903) (11,121)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 6,043 13,442 (6,186)
       

(Loss) earnings before income taxes

 (1,205) 9,594 (12,903)

Income tax expense

 8,411 6,043 13,442 

Net earnings (loss)

 3,551 (26,345) (4,935)

Net (loss) earnings

 (9,616) 3,551 (26,345)

Less: net earnings—noncontrolling interests

 1,922 1,872 1,082  1,263 1,922 1,872 
       

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Hill International, Inc.

 $1,629 $(28,217)$(6,017)
       

Net (loss) earnings attributable to Hill International, Inc.

 $(10,879)$1,629 $(28,217)
       

Basic earnings (loss) per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $0.04 $(0.73)$(0.16)
       

Basic (loss) earnings per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $(0.25)$0.04 $(0.73)
       

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding

 39,098 38,500 38,414  44,370 39,098 38,500 
       
       

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $0.04 $(0.73)$(0.16)
       

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share—Hill International, Inc.

 $(0.25)$0.04 $(0.73)
       

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 39,322 38,500 38,414  44,370 39,322 38,500 
       
       

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) EARNINGS

(in thousands)


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Net earnings (loss)

 $3,551 $(26,345)$(4,935)

Net (loss) earnings

 $(9,616)$3,551 $(26,345)

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

 (7,733) (2,267) (5,158) (10,406) (7,733) (2,267)

Other, net

 218 (392) (395) 123 218 (392)
       

Comprehensive loss

 (3,964) (29,004) (10,488) (19,899) (3,964) (29,004)

Comprehensive earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 (576) 332 (127)
       

Comprehensive (loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

 (391) (576) 332 

Comprehensive loss attributable to Hill International, Inc.

 $(3,388)$(29,336)$(10,361) $(19,508)$(3,388)$(29,336)
       
       

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents

HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011
2012

(in thousands)


 Common Stock  
  
  
  
  
 Shares Held in
Escrow
  
  
  
  Common Stock  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
 Treasury Stock Hill
Share of
Stockholders'
Equity
  
  
 

  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
 Treasury Stock Hill
Share of
Stockholders'
Equity
  
  
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Non-
controlling
Interests
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 

 Shares
Issued
  
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
  Shares Held in
Escrow
 Shares Amount Amount Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
Hill
Share of
Stockholders'
Equity

 Amount Amount Shares Non-
controlling
Interests
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 

Balance—December 31, 2010

 44,686 4 123,762 79,643 (14,552) 6,434 (27,766 161,091 

Net (loss) earnings

    (6,017)      (6,017) 1,082 (4,935)

Other comprehensive loss

     (4,344)     (4,344) (1,209) (5,553)

Issuance of restricted stock

 62  976       976  976 

Stock issued to Board of Directors

 24  150       150  150 

Stock-based compensation expense

   1,941       1,941  1,941 

Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan

 149  545       545  545 

Exercise of stock options

 16  39       39  39 

Tax effect of restricted stock

   (245)       (245)  (245)

Increase due to business combination

           11,380 11,380 

Transfer of shares held in escrow

        (13)     
                         

Balance—December 31, 2011

 44,937 4 127,168 73,626 (18,896) 6,434 (27,766)   154,136 18,258 172,394  44,937 $4 $127,168 $73,626 $(18,896) 6,434 $(27,766)$154,136 $18,258 $172,394 

Net (loss) earnings

    (28,217)      (28,217) 1,872 (26,345)    (28,217)    (28,217) 1,872 (26,345)

Other comprehensive loss

     (1,119)     (1,119) (1,540) (2,659)     (1,119)   (1,119) (1,540) (2,659)

Issuance of restricted stock

 61 1 179       180  180  61 1 179     180  180 

Stock issued to Board of Directors

 52  150       150  150  52  150     150  150 

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,126       2,126  2,126    2,126     2,126  2,126 

Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan

 37  105       105  105  37  105     105  105 

Exercise of stock options

 10  24       24  24  10  24     24  24 

Tax effect of restricted stock

   161       161  161    161     161  161 

Payment of dividends to noncontrolling interests

           (1,439) (1,439)         (1,439) (1,439)

Acquisition of additional interest in subsidiary

           (3,594) (3,594)         (3,594) (3,594)
                         

Balance—December 31, 2012

 45,097 5 129,913 45,409 (20,015) 6,434 (27,766)   127,546 13,557 141,103  45,097 5 129,913 45,409 (20,015) 6,434 (27,766) 127,546 13,557 141,103 

Net earnings (loss)

    1,629      1,629 1,922 3,551     1,629    1,629 1,922 3,551 

Other comprehensive loss

     (5,017)     (5,017) (2,498) (7,515)     (5,017)   (5,017) (2,498) (7,515)

Stock issued to Board of Directors

 52  150       150  150  52  150     150  150 

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,811       2,811  2,811    2,811     2,811  2,811 

Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan

 51  138       138  138  51  138     138  138 

Exercise of stock options

 8  20       20  20  8  20     20  20 

Tax effect of restricted stock

   (583)       (583)  (583)   (583)     (583)  (583)

Stock issued for acquisition of businesses

 1,390  4,450       4,450  4,450  1,390  4,450     4,450  4,450 

Acquisition of additional interest in subsidiary

           (1,094) (1,094)         (1,094) (1,094)
                         

Balance—December 31, 2013

 46,598 $5 $136,899 $47,038 $(25,032) 6,434 $(27,766)  $ $131,144 $11,887 $143,031  46,598 5 136,899 47,038 (25,032) 6,434 (27,766) 131,144 11,887 143,031 
                         

Net (loss) earnings

    (10,879)    (10,879) 1,263 (9,616)

Other comprehensive loss

     (8,629)   (8,629) (1,654) (10,283)

Sale of common stock

 9,547 1 38,041     38,042  38,042 

Stock issued to Board of Directors

 27  175     175  175 

Stock-based compensation expense

   3,327     3,327  3,327 

Cancelation of restricted stock

 (2)  (8)     (8)  (8)

Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan

 55  197     197  197 

Exercise of stock options

 324  1,032     1,032  1,032 

Cashless exercise of stock options

 200  538   112 (538)    

Stock issued for acquisition of CPI

 171  618     618  618 

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

         (173) (173)

Acquisition of additional interest in subsidiary

   (907)     (907) (2,649) (3,556)

Balance—December 31, 2014

 56,920 $6 $179,912 $36,159 $(33,661) 6,546 $(28,304)$154,112 $8,674 $162,786 
                         

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Cash flows from operating activities:

              

Net earnings (loss)

 $3,551 $(26,345)$(4,935)

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:

       

Net (loss) earnings

 $(9,616)$3,551 $(26,345)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

       

Depreciation and amortization

 10,756 12,430 15,640  9,823 10,756 12,430 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   (190)

Provision for bad debts

 3,928 3,209 3,178  5,323 3,928 3,209 

Interest accretion on term loan

 7,955 1,520   15,526 7,955 1,520 

Deferred tax provision (benefit)

 (2,171) 5,256 (11,629)

Deferred tax (benefit) provision

 (2,241) (2,171) 5,256 

Stock based compensation

 2,961 2,276 2,091  3,494 2,961 2,276 

Issuance of restricted stock

  180 976    180 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions in 2013 and 2011):

       

Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions in 2014 and 2013):

       

Restricted cash

 3,822 (10,499) (1,801) 286 3,822 (10,499)

Accounts receivable

 (11,899) (11,638) (18,722) (25,498) (11,899) (11,638)

Accounts receivable—affiliate

 768 570 1,400  (3,501) 768 570 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 (2,116) (1,515) 541  (3,832) (2,116) (1,515)

Income taxes receivable

 (744) (1,665) (561) 1,216 (744) (1,665)

Retainage receivable

 2,734 488 (1,332) (2,088) 2,734 488 

Other assets

 109 5,144 3,266  (449) 109 5,144 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 (3,387) 11,944 281  9,857 (3,387) 11,944 

Income taxes payable

 1,688 2,596 1,406  47 1,688 2,596 

Deferred revenue

 5,476 1,741 2,985  2,427 5,476 1,741 

Other current liabilities

 4,923 (428) (3,130) (2,921) 4,923 (428)

Retainage payable

 (3,151) (1,352) 1,814  1,440 (3,151) (1,352)

Other liabilities

 (3,770) (383) (1,748) 7,012 (3,770) (383)
       

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 21,433 (6,471) (10,470) 6,305 21,433 (6,471)
       

Cash flows from investing activities:

              

Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired

   (13,154)

Purchase of business, net of cash acquired

 (2,701)   

Purchase of additional interest in Engineering S.A.

 (3,556)   

Cash received in stock-based acquisitions

 964     964  

Payments for additional equity interests in Hill Spain

 (12,062)  (1,615)  (12,062)  

Payments for purchase of property and equipment

 (3,764) (2,377) (4,883) (5,721) (3,764) (2,377)

Distributions from affiliate

 36 156 265   36 156 

Contribution to affiliate

   (949)

Sale of investment

  3,149     3,149 
       

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 (14,826) 928 (20,336) (11,978) (14,826) 928 
       

Cash flows from financing activities:

              

Due to bank

 (19) (1,278) (3,604) (2) (19) (1,278)

Proceeds from secondary public offering of common stock

 38,042   

Proceeds from term loan borrowing

 120,000  75,000 

Payoff and termination of term loan

 (100,000)   

Payoff and termination of revolving credit facility

 (25,500)   

Payment of financing fees

 (10,065)   

Payment on Engineering S.A. note payable

 (5,095)     (5,095)  

Payments on notes payable

 (167) (3,669) (6,257)  (167) (3,669)

Net (payments) borrowings on revolving loans

 (14,133) 21,084 (56,497)

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

  (1,439)   (173)  (1,439)

Payments of deferred loan cost

  (3,329)  

Net borrowings on revolving loans

 21,084 (56,497) 18,526 

Term loan borrowing

  75,000  

Payment of deferred loan cost

   (3,329)

Proceeds from stock issued under employee stock purchase plan

 138 105 545  197 138 105 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 20 24 39  1,032 20 24 
       

Net cash provided by financing activities

 15,961 8,917 9,249  9,398 15,961 8,917 
       

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 (8,903) (4,582) 75  (3,982) (8,903) (4,582)
       

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 13,665 (1,208) (21,482)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 (257) 13,665 (1,208)

Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of year

 16,716 17,924 39,406  30,381 16,716 17,924 
       

Cash and cash equivalents—end of year

 $30,381 $16,716 $17,924  $30,124 $30,381 $16,716 
       
       

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—The Company

        Hill International, Inc. ("Hill" or the "Company") is a professional services firm that provides program management, project management, construction management, construction claims and other consulting services primarily to the buildings, transportation, environmental, energy and industrial markets worldwide. Hill's clients include the U.S. federal government, U.S. state and local governments, foreign governments and the private sector. The Company is organized into two key operating divisions: the Project Management Group and the Construction Claims Group.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)
Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Hill International, Inc. and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(b)
Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The estimates affecting the consolidated financial statements that are particularly significant include revenue recognition, allocation of purchase price to acquired intangibles and goodwill, recoverability of long-lived assets, income taxes, allowance for doubtful accounts and commitments and contingencies.

(c)
Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions

        Assets and liabilities of all foreign operations are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and the statements of operations are translated at the average rates of exchange for the year. Gains or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements are accumulated in a separate component of stockholders' equity entitled accumulated other comprehensive loss until the entity is sold or substantially liquidated.

        Gains or losses from foreign currency transactions (transactions denominated in a currency other than the entity's local currency) are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

(d)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The fair value of financial instruments, which primarily consists of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and due to bank, approximates carrying value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The carrying value of our various credit facilities approximates fair value as the interest rate is variable. The term loan approximates fair value as the Company recently entered into that agreement.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(e)
Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and investments in money market funds and investment grade securities held with high quality financial institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

(f)
Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash represents cash collateral required to be maintained in foreign bank accounts to serve as collateral for letters of credit, bonds or guarantees on several projects. The cash will remain restricted until the respective project has been completed, which typically is greater than one year.

(g)
Concentrations of Credit Risk

        Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash investments and accounts receivable.

        The Company maintains its cash accounts with high quality financial institutions. Although the Company currently believes that the financial institutions, with which it does business, will be able to fulfill their commitments to it, there is no assurance that those institutions will be able to continue to do so.

        The Company provides professional services, under contractual arrangements, to domestic and foreign governmental units, institutions and the private sector. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its clients and does not require collateral beyond customary retainers.

        At December 31, 2013,2014, the accounts receivable related to the work performed prior to March 2011 under contracts in Libya, amounted to approximately $57,000,000. The Company believes that$49,659,000. See Note 4 to the amounts due will be collected, however, if future events preclude us from doing so, there could be a significant adverse impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations and consolidated financial position.statements for further information.

        The following tables show the number of the Company's clients which contributed 10% or more of revenue and accounts receivable, respectively:

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 20142013 20122011 

Number of 10% clients

  1    1 

Percentage of total revenue

  10%N/A  N/A 15%

 


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

Number of 10% clients

 1 1  1 1 

Percentage of accounts receivable

 25% 26% 20% 25%

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        The following provides information with respect to total revenue from contracts with U.S. federal government agencies:


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended
December 31,
 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Percentage of total revenue

 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
       
       

(h)
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        The allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate prepared by management based on identification of the collectibility of specific accounts and the overall condition of the receivable portfolios. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, the Company specifically analyzes trade receivables, including retainage receivable, historical bad debts, client credits, client concentrations, client credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in client payment terms. If the financial condition of clients were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would be able to realize more of its receivables in the future than previously estimated, an adjustment to the allowance would increase earnings in the period such determination was made. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjustments are recorded as deemed necessary.

(i)
Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

 
 Method Estimated Useful Life

Furniture and equipment

 Straight-line 10 years

Leasehold improvements

 Straight-line Shorter of estimated useful life or lease term

Computer equipment and software

 Straight-line 3 to 5 years

Automobiles

 Straight-line 5 years

        The Company capitalizes costs associated with internally developed and/or purchased software systems that have reached the application development stage and meet recoverability tests. Capitalized costs include external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining internal-use software, payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees who are directly associated with and devote time to the internal-use software project. Capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases no later than the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended purpose. Costs for general and administrative, overhead, maintenance and training, as well as the cost of software that does not add functionality to existing systems, are expensed as incurred.

        Upon retirement or other disposition of these assets, the cost and related depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is reflected in results of operations. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(j)
Retainage Receivable

        Retainage receivable represents balances billed but not paid by clients pursuant to retainage provisions in the construction management contracts and will be due upon completion of specific tasks or the completion of the contract. The current portion of retainage receivable is included in accounts receivable and the long-term portion of retainage receivable is included in retainage receivable in the consolidated balance sheets.

(k)
Long-Lived Assets

        Acquired intangible assets consist of contract rights, client related intangibles and trade names arising from the Company's acquisitions. Contract rights represent the fair value of contracts in progress and backlog of an acquired entity. For intangible assets purchased in a business combination, the estimated fair values of the assets are used to establish the cost bases. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach are used to measure fair value. These assets are amortized over their estimated lives which range from three to fifteen years.

        The Company reviews long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flow discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

(l)
Goodwill

        Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and other related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized over their useful lives. For intangible assets purchased in a business combination, the estimated fair values of the assets are used to establish the cost bases. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach the income approach and the costincome approach are used to measure fair value.

        Goodwill is tested annually for impairment in its fiscal third quarter. The Company has determined that it has two reporting units, the Project Management unit and the Construction Claims unit. The Company made that determination based on the similarity of the services provided, the methodologies in delivering our services and the similarity of the client base in each of these units. Goodwill is assessed for impairment using a two-step approach. In the first step of the impairment test, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which the goodwill resides to its carrying value. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired and the Company must perform a second more detailed assessment. The second step, if necessary, involves allocating the reporting unit's fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgments including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for the businesses, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of the Company's weighted average cost of capital. The Company's changes in estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or conclusions on goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. The Company performed its annual impairment test effective July 1, 20132014 and noted no impairment for either of its reporting units. In the future, the Company will continue to perform the annual test during its fiscal third quarter unless events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred before that time.

(m)
Investments

Hill International (Spain), S.A.

        The Company's subsidiary, Hill International (Spain), S.A. ("Hill Spain"), has the following cost-basis investments:

Other

        The Company will, in the ordinary course, form joint ventures for specific projects. These joint ventures typically require limited or no investment and simply provide a pass-through for the Company's billings. Any distributions in excess of the Company's billings are accounted for as income when received.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(n)
Due to Bank

        Under the Company's cash-management system, certain cash accounts reflect credit balances to the extent checks were disbursed but not immediately funded at the bank. The Company manages this process daily and ensures all checks are funded when presented.

(o)
Deferred Revenue

        In certain instances the Company may collect advance payments from clients for future services. Upon receipt, the payments are reflected as deferred revenue in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. As the services are performed, the Company reduces the balance and recognizes revenue.

(p)
Deferred Rent

        Rent expenses for operating leases which include scheduled rent increases is determined by expensing the total amount of rent due over the life of the operating lease on a straight-line basis. The difference between the rent paid under the terms of the lease and the rent expensed on a straight-line basis is recorded as a liability. The deferred rent at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $2,968,000 and 2012 was $3,043,000, and $2,792,000, respectively, and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

(q)
Income Taxes

        The Company estimates income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating its actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company assesses the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent it believes recovery is not likely, the Company establishes a valuation allowance. To the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance in a period, it must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statements of earnings. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely to be realized in future years. If the Company determines in the future that it is more likely that the deferred tax assets subject to the valuation allowance will be realized, then the previously provided valuation allowance will be adjusted.

        The Company recognizes a tax benefit in the financial statements for an uncertain tax position only if management's assessment is that the position is "more likely than not" (i.e., a likelihood greater than 50 percent) to be allowed by the tax jurisdiction based solely on the technical merits of the position. The term "tax position" refers to a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax return that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities for interim or annual periods.

(r)
Revenue Recognition

        The Company generates revenue primarily from providing professional services to its clients. Revenue is generally recognized upon the performance of services. In providing these services, the Company may incur reimbursable expenses, which consist principally of amounts paid to subcontractors and other third parties and travel and other job related expenses that are contractually reimbursable


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

from clients. The Company has determined that it will include reimbursable expenses in computing and reporting its total revenue as long as the Company remains responsible to the client for the fulfillment of the contract and for the overall acceptability of all services provided.

        The Company earns its revenue from time-and-materials, cost-plus and fixed-price contracts. If estimated total costs on any contract indicate a loss, the Company charges the entire estimated loss to operations in the period the loss becomes known. The cumulative effect of revisions to revenue, estimated costs to complete contracts, including penalties, incentive awards, change orders, claims, anticipated losses, and others are recorded in the accounting period in which the events indicating a loss are known and the loss can be reasonably estimated. Such revisions could occur at any time and the effects may be material.

Time-and-Materials Contracts

        Under its time-and-materials contracts, the Company negotiates hourly billing rates and charges its clients based on the actual time that the Company spends on a project. In addition, clients reimburse the Company for its actual out-of-pocket costs of materials and other direct incidental expenditures that the Company incurs in connection with its performance under the contract. Its profit margins on time-and-materials contracts fluctuate based on actual labor and overhead costs that the Company directly charges or allocates to contracts compared with negotiated billing rates. Revenue on these contracts are recognized based on the actual number of hours the Company spends on the projects plus any actual out-of-pocket costs of materials and other direct incidental expenditures that the Company incurs on the projects. Its time-and-materials contracts generally include annual billing rate adjustment provisions.

Cost-Plus Contracts

        The Company has two major types of cost-plus contracts:

        Under cost-plus fixed fee contracts, the Company charges its clients for its costs, including both direct and indirect costs, plus a fixed negotiated fee. In negotiating a cost-plus fixed fee contract, the Company estimates all recoverable direct and indirect costs and then adds a fixed profit component. The total estimated cost plus the negotiated fee represents the total contract value. The Company recognizes revenue based on the actual labor costs, based on hours of labor effort, plus non-labor costs the Company incurs, plus the portion of the fixed fee the Company has earned to date. The Company invoices for its services as revenue is recognized or in accordance with agreed-upon billing schedules. Aggregate revenue from cost-plus fixed fee contracts may vary based on the actual number of labor hours worked and other actual contract costs incurred. However, if actual labor hours and other contract costs exceed the original estimate agreed to by its client, the Company generally must obtain a change order, contract modification, or successfully prevail in a claim in order to receive additional revenue relating to the additional costs (see "Change Orders and Claims").

        Under its cost-plus fixed rate contracts, the Company charges clients for its costs plus negotiated rates based on its indirect costs. In negotiating a cost-plus fixed rate contract, the Company estimates


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

all recoverable direct and indirect costs and then adds a profit component, which is a percentage of total recoverable costs to arrive at a total dollar estimate for the project. The Company recognizes revenue based on the actual total number of labor hours and other costs the Company expends at the cost plus the fixed rate the Company negotiated. Similar to cost-plus fixed fee contracts, aggregate revenue from cost-plus fixed rate contracts may vary and the Company generally must obtain a change order, contract modification, or successfully prevail in a claim in order to receive additional revenue relating to any additional costs that exceed the original contract estimate (see "Change Orders and Claims").

        Labor costs and subcontractor services are the principal components of its direct costs on cost-plus contracts, although some include materials and other direct costs. Some of these contracts include a provision that the total actual costs plus the fee will not exceed a guaranteed price negotiated with the client. Others include rate ceilings that limit the reimbursement for general and administrative costs, overhead costs and materials handling costs. The accounting for these contracts appropriately reflects such guaranteed price or rate ceilings.

Firm Fixed-Price ("FFP") Contracts

        The Company's FFP contracts have historically accounted for most of its fixed-price contracts. Under FFP contracts, the Company's clients pay an agreed amount negotiated in advance for a specified scope of work. The Company recognizes revenue on FFP contracts using the percentage-of-completion method (recognizing revenue as costs are incurred). Profit margins the Company recognizes in all periods prior to completion of the project on any FFP contract depend on the accuracy of the Company's estimates of approximate revenue and expenses and will increase to the extent that its current estimates of aggregate actual costs are below amounts previously estimated. Conversely, if the Company's current estimated costs exceed prior estimates, its profit margins will decrease and the Company may realize a loss on a project. In order to increase aggregate revenue on the contract, the Company generally must obtain a change order, contract modification, or successfully prevail in a claim in order to receive payment for the additional costs (see "Change Orders and Claims").

Change Orders and Claims

        Change orders are modifications of an original contract that effectively change the provisions of the contract without adding new provisions. Either the Company or its client may initiate change orders. They may include changes in specifications or design, manner of performance, facilities, equipment, materials, sites and period of completion of the work. Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price that the Company seeks to collect from its clients or others for client-caused delays, errors in specifications and designs, contract terminations, change orders that are either in dispute or are unapproved as to both scope and price, or other causes of unanticipated additional contract costs.

        Change orders and claims occur when changes are experienced once contract performance is underway. Change orders are sometimes documented and terms of such change orders are agreed with the client before the work is performed. Sometimes circumstances require that work progresses before agreement is reached with the client. Costs related to change orders and claims are recognized when they are incurred. Change orders and claims are included in total estimated contract revenue when it is


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

probable that the change order or claim will result in a bona fide addition to contract value that can be reliably estimated. No profit is recognized on claims until final settlement occurs; unapproved change orders are evaluated as claims. This can lead to a situation where costs are recognized in one period and revenue is recognized when client agreement is obtained or claims resolution occurs, which can be in subsequent periods.

        The Company has contracts with the U.S. government that contain provisions requiring compliance with the U.S. Federal Acquisition Regulations ("FAR"). These regulations are generally applicable to all of its federal government contracts and are partially or fully incorporated in many local and state agency contracts. They limit the recovery of certain specified indirect costs on contracts subject to the FAR. Cost-plus contracts covered by the FAR provide for upward or downward adjustments if actual recoverable costs differ from the estimate billed under forward pricing arrangements. Most of its federal government contracts are subject to termination at the convenience of the client. Contracts typically provide for reimbursement of costs incurred and payment of fees earned through the date of such termination.

        Federal government contracts which are subject to the FAR and some state and local governmental agencies require audits, which are performed for the most part by the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA"). The DCAA audits the Company's overhead rates, cost proposals, incurred government contract costs, and internal control systems. During the course of its audits, the DCAA may question incurred costs if it believes the Company has accounted for such costs in a manner inconsistent with the requirements of the FAR or Cost Accounting Standards and recommend that its U.S. government corporate administrative contracting officer disallow such costs. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant disallowed costs as a result of such audits. However, the Company can provide no assurance that the DCAA audits will not result in material disallowances of incurred costs in the future.

(s)
Share-Based Compensation

        The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the estimated fair value of options to purchase the Company's common stock. The compensation expense, less estimated forfeitures, is being recognized over the service period on a straight-line basis. The Company's policy is to use newly issued shares to satisfy the exercise of stock options.

(t)
Advertising Costs

        Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to the following (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31, 
2014 2013 2012 
$599 $396 $325 
 
 Years Ended December 31,  
 
 2013 2012 2011  
  $396 $325 $461  
         
         

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(u)
Earnings per Share

        Basic earnings per common share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share incorporates the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Dilutive stock options increased average common shares outstanding by approximately 225,000 shares for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, stock options were anti-dilutive.

        Options to purchase 3,521,000 shares, 5,364,000 shares 4,492,000 shares and 2,385,0004,492,000 shares of the Company's common stock were not included in the calculation of common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive.

(v)   Recent
New Accounting PronouncementsPronouncement

        In February 2013,On May 28, 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASUAccounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-2,2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends the Comprehensive Income Topicwill replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the ASC.ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. The ASU requires companies to report either onadditional disclosure about the income statement or disclosenature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. The ASU will be effective for interim and annual periods commencing after December 15, 2016 and allows for both retrospective and prospective methods of adoption. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is in the footnotes toprocess of determining the financial statementmethod of adoption and assessing the effects on earnings from items that are reclassified outimpact of the category of shareholder equity called accumulated other comprehensive income. The adjustments will consist of amounts from the fiscal period covered by the financial statements. Companies will also have to make cross references to other disclosures required in U.S. GAAP for other line items used to adjust earnings. The FASB wants this requirement applied to amounts that are initially transferred to another balance sheet item before being entered as an adjustment to earnings. The Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2013. The ASU did not affect the Company'sits consolidated results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.statements.

Note 3—Acquisitions

        Our recent acquisition activity is detailed below. The Company's consolidated financial statements include the operating results of these businesses from their respective dates of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to the Company's consolidated results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate.

        The Company expenses all acquisition-related costs plus any anticipated restructuring costs for which it is not obligated at the acquisition date, rather than including such costs as a component of the purchase consideration. During 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, the Company expensed $263,000, $455,000 $84,000 and $164,000,$84,000, respectively, of acquisition-related costs.

Angus Octan Scotland Ltd.

        On October 31, 2014, our subsidiary Hill International (UK) Ltd. acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Angus Octan Scotland Ltd., which included its subsidiary companies Cadogan Consultants Ltd., Cadogan Consult Ltd. and Cadogan International Ltd. (collectively, "Cadogans"). Cadogans, with 27 professionals, has offices in Glasgow and Dundee. The acquisition expanded Hill's construction claims business and provided additional resources in the energy and industrial sectors. Total consideration for the acquisition was £2,719,000 (approximately $4,350,000 at the date of acquisition). The consideration consists of cash payments of £1,000,000 ($1,600,000) at closing, £600,000 ($960,000) on November 25, 2014, £400,000 ($640,000) on December 23, 2014, £519,000 ($830,000) to be paid on October 31, 2015 and an earn-out based upon the average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") for the two-year period ending on October 31, 2016 (which amount shall not be less than £0 nor more than £200,000). Two of the selling shareholders may receive an earn-out in five annual installments of up to £100,000 each ($160,000), which will be charged to earnings, provided that Cadogans' EBITDA for each of the years ending October 31, 2015, 2016, 2017,


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

2018 and 2019 is equal to or greater than £396,000 ($633,000). The Company accrued the potential additional consideration of £719,000 ($1,150,000), of which £519,000 is included in other current liabilities and £200,000 is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014. The Company acquired intangible assets and goodwill amounting to £1,353,000 (approximately $2,165,000 on the date of acquisition) and £541,000 (approximately $865,000), respectively. The acquired intangible assets have a weighted average life of 8.9 years. The acquired intangible assets consist of a client relationship intangible of £1,181,000 ($1,890,000) with a ten-year life, a trade name intangible of £82,000 ($131,000) with a two-year life and a contract intangible of £90,000 ($144,000) with a six-month life. Goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, has been allocated to the Construction Claims operating segment.

Collaborative Partners, Inc.

        On December 23, 2013, Hill acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Collaborative Partners, Inc. ("CPI"), a firm that provides project management, strategic planning and regulatory services for healthcare, life sciences, educational, commercial and residential construction projects throughout New England. CPI, which has 20about 30 professionals, has offices in Boston, Massachusetts and Providence, Rhode Island. The acquisition expands the Company's project management business in the New England region of the United States. At closing, the sellers received $2,450,000 in the form of 678,670 shares of the Company's common stock priced at $3.61 per share. On March 7, 2014, the


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

sellers received 171,308 shares of common stock with a value of $618,000 representing CPI's common equity in excess of $600,000. On December 23, 2014, the sellers willwere to receive, subject to potential offset, an additional $350,000 ("holdback") in shares of common stock; the number of shares will bewas determined based on the average closing price of the common stock for the ten trading days ending on December 18, 2014. The Agreement also providesprovided that (1) should the price of the Company's common stock not increase by 50% to $5.42 on December 23, 2014, the Company will issue additional shares to the sellers representing the difference between $5.42 and the price on December 23, 2014 and (2) the sellers are entitled to receive additional shares of the Company's common stock for (i) 50% of the operating profit of CPI in excess of $1,000,000 for the first 12-month period after closing, but in no event more than $500,000, and (ii) 5% of the net revenue backlog in excess of $10,000,000 on the date 60 days after closing. The Company has estimated and accrued $2,697,000 for the potential additional consideration which iswas included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013. TheIn April 2014, the portion of the liability attributable to the change in the common stock price will be remeasured at each reporting datewas waived by the sellers and any change in the liability will be reflectedwas eliminated by a credit of $1,225,000 to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company acquired intangible assets and goodwill amounting to $1,516,000 and $3,049,000, respectively. The acquired intangible assets haveoperations for the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, a weighted average lifeportion of 5.3 years. The acquired intangible assets consist of a client relationship intangible of $509,000 with a ten-year life and a contract intangible of $1,007,000 with a three-year life. Goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, has been allocatedthe liability attributable to the Project Managementholdback in shares was not paid and $215,000 was credited to selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014. In the first quarter of 2015, the Company will settle the amounts due for the holdback, the excess operating segment.profit and backlog by issuing 148,460 shares of its common stock valued at approximately $530,000.

Binnington Copeland & Associates (Pty.) Ltd.

        On May 30, 2013, Hill International N.V., the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Binnington Copeland & Associates (Pty.) Ltd. and BCA Training (Pty.) Ltd. (together "BCA"). BCA, with 34 professionals, has offices in Johannesburg and


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

Cape Town, South Africa. The acquisition provides the Company's claims business access to Africa's large infrastructure and mining projects and allows for expansion into the rest of sub-Saharan Africa. Consideration consisted of $2,000,000 plus a potential earn-out, both payable in shares of the Company's common stock. The purchase price is payable as follows: $1,072,400 (the "Closing Date Payment") on the closing date, $927,600 (the "Second Tranche Payment") on July 31, 2013 and an earn-out (the "Third Tranche Payment") to be determined in the third quarter of 2014. The Company issued 379,655 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of the Closing Date Payment; the number of shares was determined by dividing the Closing Date Payment by the average closing price of our common stock for the thirty trading days ending on May 17, 2013. On July 31, 2013, the Company issued 331,444 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of the Second Tranche Payment. The number of shares was determined by dividing the Second Tranche Payment by the average closing price of our common stock for the thirty trading days ending on July 19, 2013. The shares issuable in satisfaction of the Third Tranche Payment will be determined by dividing the Third Tranche Payment by the average closing price of our common stock for the thirty trading days ending on July 21, 2014. The actual amount of the Third Tranche Payment will be determined by comparing the average net profit before taxes for the two-year periods ending July 31, 2014 to the net profit before taxes for the year ended July 31, 2012, and multiplying the excess, if any, by 2.205. TheBCA's average net profit before taxes for the two years ended July 31, 2014 was not sufficient to earn any of the Third Tranche Payment ispayment, which had been estimated to be approximately $902,000. The Company reflected$902,000 at the date of acquisition. Since no amount is due to the selling shareholders, the liability for the Third Tranche Payment in other current liabilitieshas been eliminated by a credit of $893,000 to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated balance sheet atstatements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company acquired intangible assets and goodwill amounting to 13,143,000 South African Rand (ZAR) (approximately $1,312,000 on the acquisition date) and ZAR 12,873,000 ($1,285,000), respectively. The acquired


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

intangible assets have a weighted average life of 8.2 years. The acquired intangible assets consist of a client relationship intangible of ZAR 10,546,000 ($1,053,000) with a ten-year life, a contract intangible of ZAR 1,863,000 ($186,000) with an 8-month life and a trade name intangible of ZAR 734,000 ($73,000) with a two-year life. Goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, has been allocated to the Construction Claims operating segment.2014.

Engineering S.A.

        On February 28, 2011, the Company's subsidiary, Hill Spain, indirectly acquired 60% of the outstanding common stock of Engineering S.A., one of the largest project management firms in Brazil with approximately 400 professionals. It has main offices in Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo and an additional office in Parauapebas. Engineering S.A. provides project management, construction management and engineering consulting services throughout Brazil. Total consideration will not exceed 42,000,000 Brazilian Reais ("BR") (approximately $25,336,000 at the date of acquisition) consisting of an initial cash payment of BR22,200,000 (approximately $13,392,000) plus minimum additional payments of BR7,400,000 (approximately $4,464,000) due on each of April 30, 2012 and 2013 and a potential additional payment of BR5,000,000 ($3,016,000). The Company acquired intangible assets and goodwill amounting to BR24,540,000 ($14,783,000) and BR46,339,000 ($27,987,000), respectively. The acquired intangible assets have a weighted average life of 7.7 years. The acquired intangible assets consist of a client relationship intangible of BR13,942,000 ($8,399,000) with a ten-year life, a contract intangible of BR8,385,000 ($5,051,000) with a two-year life and a trade name intangible of BR2,213,000 ($1,333,000) with a fifteen-year life. Goodwill, which is deductible for income tax purposes, has been allocated to the Project Management operating segment. Also, ESA's shareholders entered into an agreement whereby the minority shareholders have a right to compel ("ESA Put Option") Hill Spain to purchase any or all of their shares during the period from February 28, 2014 to February 28, 2021. Hill Spain also has the right to compel ("ESA Call Option") the minority shareholders to sell any or all of their shares during the same time period. The purchase price for such shares shall be seven times the earnings before interest and taxes for ESA's most recently ended fiscal year, net of any financial debt plus excess cash multiplied by a percentage which the shares to be purchased bear to the total number


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

of shares outstanding at the time of purchase, but in the event the ESA Call Option is exercised by Hill Spain, the purchase price shall be increased by five percent. The ESA Put Option and the ESA Call Option must be made within three months after the audited financial statements of ESA have been completed. In April 2014, two of the minority shareholders exercised their ESA Put Option whereby Hill Spain paid approximately 7,838,000 Brazilian Reais (approximately $3,556,000) in October 2014. After the transaction, Hill Spain owns approximately 72% of ESA. In accordance with the guidance in ASC 810-10-45-23, underChanges in the Parent's Ownership Interest in a Subsidiary When There Is No Change in Control, the Company has accounted for this transaction as an equity transaction. Accordingly, Hill Spain reduced noncontrolling interests by 5,839,000 Brazilian Reais (approximately $2,649,000), and reduced additional paid in capital by approximately 1,999,000 Brazilian Reais (approximately $907,000) which represents the excess of the fair value over the amount of the adjustment to noncontrolling interests.

        The Company estimated the fair value of the potential additional payments to total approximately BR17,200,000 (approximately $10,376,000) and has discounted these amounts using an interest rate of 4.72%, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Company's Credit Agreementcredit agreement at the acquisition date. The Company paid the first installment amounting to 6,624,000 BRL (approximately $3,508,000 on April 30, 2012 and paid the second installment amounting to 11,372,000 BRL (approximately $5,095,000) on July 23, 2013.

Gerens Management Group, S.A.

        On February 15, 2008, the Company's subsidiary, Hill International N.V. (formerly Hill International S.A.), acquired 60% of the outstanding capital stock of Gerens Management Group, S.A., whose name was subsequently changed to Hill International (Spain), S.A. ("Hill Spain"). In connection with the acquisition, Hill Spain's shareholders entered into an agreement whereby the minority


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

shareholders have a right to compel ("Gerens Put Option") Hill International N.V. to purchase any or all of their shares during the period from March 31, 2010 to March 31, 2020. Hill International N.V. also has the right to compel the minority shareholders to sell any or all of their shares during the period from March 31, 2011 to March 31, 2021. The purchase price for such shares shall be the greater of (a) €18,000,000 ($23,808,000 as of December 31, 2012) increased by the General Price Index (capped at 3.5% per annum) or (b) ten times Hill Spain's earnings before interest and income taxes for the prior fiscal year, multiplied by a percentage which the shares to be purchased bear to the total number of shares outstanding at the time of purchase. Such amount may be adjusted for increases in equity subsequent to the acquisition date, and can be paid in cash or shares of our common stock at the option of the sellers.

        During late 2011 through late 2012, ten minority shareholders, who owned approximately 23.9% of the outstanding common stock of Hill Spain, exercised their Gerens Put Options. TheOn January 3, 2013, the Company accruedpaid for the liability ofadditional interest by paying approximately €7,166,000 (approximately $9,477,000) which is included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012. The balance includesincluding interest of approximately €115,000 (approximately $152,000) which has beenwas charged to interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012. The aggregate consideration plus interest was paid on January 3, 2013. In connection with the transactions, the Company reduced noncontrolling interests by €2,717,000 (approximately $3,594,000), increased goodwill by €1,300,000 (approximately $1,720,000) and increased intangible assets by €4,334,000 (approximately $5,580,000) during 2012.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3—Acquisitions (Continued)

        During 2013, the remaining minority shareholders, who owned approximately 6.8% of the outstanding common stock of Hill Spain, exercised their Gerens Put Options. The Company now owns 100% of Hill Spain. The aggregate consideration plus interest was paid on December 4, 2013 in the amount of €2,031,000 (approximately $2,793,000). The balance includesincluded interest of approximately €42,000 (approximately $56,000). In connection with the transactions, the Company reduced noncontrolling interests by €828,000 (approximately $1,094,000), increased goodwill by €348,000 (approximately $460,000) and increased intangible assets by approximately €1,161,000 (approximately $1,534,000).

Note 4—Accounts Receivable

        The components of accounts receivable are as follows:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Billed

 $206,469 $181,075  $159,959 $206,469 

Retainage, current portion

 10,215 5,022  12,700 10,215 

Unbilled

 24,857 35,347  32,739 24,857 
     

 241,541 221,444  205,398 241,541 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 (9,530) (10,268) (11,142) (9,530)
     

Total

 $232,011 $211,176  $194,256 $232,011 
     
     

        Unbilled receivables primarily represent revenue earned on contracts, which the Company is contractually precluded from billing until predetermined future dates.

        Included in billed receivables are $1,562,000 and $2,030,000 of the amounts due from various branches of the U.S. federal government and $100,773,000 and $99,643,000 of receivables from foreign governments at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

        Bad debt expense of $5,323,000, $3,928,000 and $3,209,000 is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

        The Company has open but inactive contracts with the Libyan Organization for the Development and Administrative Centres ("ODAC"). Due to the civil unrest which commenced in Libya in February 2011, the Company suspended its operations in and demobilized substantially all of its personnel from Libya. From that time until 2013, there was no activity on the contracts and the Company did not receive any payments for the work performed prior to March 2011. During late 2013 and early 2014, Hill received payments of approximately $9,900,000 from ODAC who also posted a letter of credit of approximately $14,000,000 in Hill's favor which expired on June 30, 2014. Management believed that this progress was a positive indication that ODAC intended to fulfill its obligations to Hill.

        In June 2014, a new parliament, the Council of Representatives ("CoR"), was elected and is the internationally recognized government of Libya. Subsequently, fighting broke out between forces loyal to the outgoing General National Congress ("GNC") and the new CoR. The GNC reconvened, selected a Prime Minister and seized control of the capital city of Tripoli. The GNC controls Libya's ministries, central bank and state oil company. In September 2014, the United Nations began talks to


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 4—Accounts Receivable (Continued)

        Unbilled receivables primarily represent revenue earned on contracts, whichreconcile the Companytwo factions, but management is contractually precluded from billing until predetermined future dates.not aware that any progress has been made as of February 2015. It is our understanding that, government agencies such as ODAC have not been delegated any authority to make payments other than payroll.

        Included in billed receivables are $2,030,000Management has continued its dialogue with representatives of ODAC and $2,066,000 of the amounts due from various branches of the U.S. federal government and $99,643,000 and $84,773,000 of receivables from foreign governments at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

        Bad debt expense of $3,928,000, $3,209,000 and $3,178,000 is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

        Through December 31, 2013, accounts receivable relatedunderstands that ODAC has obtained approval to work performed by Hill prior to March 2011 pursuant to contracts with the Libyan government were reduced by approximately $3,100,000. The reduction consisted of a cashfacilitate immediate payment by the Libyan Organization for the Development of Administrative Centres ("ODAC") of approximately 3,000,000 Libyan dinars ("LYD") ($2,400,000) that was made directly to Hill and a cash payment of approximately LYD 800,000 ($700,000) that was made by ODAC to Libyan tax authorities on Hill's behalf. The LYD 3,000,000 cash payment made directly toonce the political situation normalizes. Additionally, in early 2014, Hill is not freely convertible into other currencies. As a result, this cash remains in Hill's Libyan bank account. At December 31, 2013, the remaining accounts receivable outstanding related to Hill'ssubmitted new contracts for additional work in Libya amounted to approximately $57,000,000.upon ODAC's request.

        During February 2014, theThe Company received additional paymentscurrently believes that recovery of approximately $6,100,000 consisting of approximately 200,000 pounds sterling ($300,000), approximately LYD 2,100,000 ($1,700,000) and $4,100,000 in U.S. dollars.

        Since the end of the Libyan civil unrest in October 2011, the Company has sought to recover its receivable from ODAC through ongoing negotiationscontinued communications, rather than pursuelegal action, remains appropriate, however, the Company continues to explore its legal rights for payment underoptions, including discussions with outside legal counsel. In the contracts. Theevent that the military and political environment changes significantly in Libya and its surrounding geopolitical regions or there are indications that the Company's continued efforts to negotiate amicably with ODAC are determined have been unsuccessful, the Company will evaluate its options to pursue legal claims and/or assess the carrying amount of this receivable, which could have a significant adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and consolidated financial position.

        Currently, management believes that this courseit has good relationships with the ODAC authorities. However due to the lack of action provides the best likelihood for recovery as it could result in completion of and payment on the existing contracts as well as the potential for the award of new contracts. There is at present noa written agreement understanding or timetable for further payments of Hill's accounts receivable from ODAC or a return to work on Hill's existing contracts. However,contracts, management believes that these payments, along with letters of credit of approximately $14,000,000 posted in our favor by ODAC, were made in good faith and are a positive indication that ODAC intends to satisfy its obligations to Hill. However, the Company cannot predict with certainty when, or if,has reclassified the remaining accounts receivable will be paid byamounting to $49,659,000 to a non-current asset to reflect the Libyan authorities or when work will resume there. Inuncertainty surrounding the event thattiming of the Company does not realize any further payments, there could be a significant adverse impact on its consolidated resultscollection of operationsthe receivable. Additionally, management has reclassified from current to other liabilities the accruals for certain taxes and consolidated financial position.agency fees related to the ODAC contracts amounting to approximately $9,280,000.

Note 5—Property and Equipment

 
 December 31, 
 
 2014 2013 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Furniture and equipment

 $12,163 $11,190 

Leasehold improvements

  4,196  3,965 

Automobiles

  1,696  1,576 

Computer equipment and software

  24,088  22,656 

  42,143  39,387 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (30,500) (28,774)

Property and equipment, net

 $11,643 $10,613 

        Information with respect to depreciation expense is as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2014 2013 2012 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Total depreciation expense

 $3,643 $4,166 $4,394 

Portion charged to cost of services

 $1,293 $1,227 $1,350 

Portion charged to selling, general and administrative expense

 $2,350 $2,939 $3,044 

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 5—Property and Equipment

 
 December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Furniture and equipment

 $11,190 $10,495 

Leasehold improvements

  3,965  3,491 

Automobiles

  1,576  1,648 

Computer equipment and software

  22,656  21,791 
      

  39,387  37,425 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (28,774) (26,157)
      

Property and equipment, net

 $10,613 $11,268 
      
      

        Information with respect to depreciation expense is as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Total expense

 $4,166 $4,394 $5,048 
        
        

Portion charged to cost of services

 $1,227 $1,350 $1,331 
        
        

Portion charged to selling, general

          

and administrative expense

 $2,939 $3,044 $3,717 
        
        

Note 6—Intangible Assets

        The following table summarizes the Company's acquired intangible assets:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
  Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Client relationships

 $37,501 $18,238 $36,506 $14,175  $36,412 $20,758 $37,501 $18,238 

Acquired contract rights

 11,874 8,541 10,449 6,931  11,387 9,717 11,874 8,541 

Trade names

 3,266 898 3,042 643  3,023 1,065 3,266 898 
         

Total

 $52,641 $27,677 $49,997 $21,749  $50,822 $31,540 $52,641 $27,677 
         
         

Intangible assets, net

 $24,964   $28,248    $19,282   $24,964   
         
         

        Amortization expense related to intangible assets was as follows:

Years Ended December 31, 
2014 2013 2012 
(in thousands)
 
$6,180 $6,590 $8,036 
 
 Years Ended December 31,  
 
 2013 2012 2011  
 
 (in thousands)
  

 $6,590 $8,036 $10,592  
         
         

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6—Intangible Assets (Continued)

        The following table presents the estimated amortization expense based on our present intangible assets for the next five years:

Years Ending December 31,
 Estimated
Amortization
Expense
  Estimated
Amortization
Expense
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

2014

 $6,134 

2015

 5,588  $5,485 

2016

 4,122  4,014 

2017

 3,078  3,005 

2018

 2,021  2,041 

2019

 1,760 

Note 7—Goodwill

        The addition to goodwill in 2012 is due to the impact of deferred income taxes on the intangibles assets acquired in the purchase of an additional equity interest in Hill Spain.

        The addition to goodwill in 2013 is due to the acquisitions of BCA ($1,285,000) and CPI ($3,049,000) and the impact of deferred income taxes on the intangible assets acquired in the purchase of an additional equity interest in Hill Spain ($460,000).

        The addition to goodwill in 2014 is due to the acquisition of Cadogans ($865,000).


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 7—Goodwill (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the changes in the Company's carrying value of goodwill during 20132014 and 2012:2013:


 Project
Management
 Construction
Claims
 Total  Project
Management
 Construction
Claims
 Total 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 $56,896 $26,045 $82,941 

Additions

 1,720  1,720 

Translation adjustments

 (1,385) 731 (654)
       

Balance, December 31, 2012

 57,231 26,776 84,007  $57,231 $26,776 $84,007 

Additions

 3,509 1,285 4,794  3,509 1,285 4,794 

Translation adjustments

 (2,292) (656) (2,948) (2,292) (656) (2,948)
       

Balance, December 31, 2013

 $58,448 $27,405 $85,853  58,448 27,405 85,853 
       

Additions

  865 865 

Translation adjustments

 (4,779) (1,502) (6,281)

Balance, December 31, 2014

 $53,669 $26,768 $80,437 
       

Note 8—Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

        Below are the components of accounts payable and accrued expenses:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Accounts payable

 $25,349 $24,486  $32,701 $25,349 

Accrued payroll and related expenses

 35,732 33,750  39,845 35,732 

Accrued subcontractor fees

 6,212 8,253  3,930 6,212 

Accrued agency fees

 17,623 16,239  6,920 17,623 

Accrued legal and professional fees

 1,239 3,303  968 1,239 

Other accrued expenses

 6,115 4,275  7,704 6,115 
     

 $92,270 $90,306 
      $92,068 $92,270 
     

        Approximately $9,280,000 of agency fees and other accrued expenses related to the ODAC contracts have been reclassified to other liabilities as of December 31, 2014. See Note 4 for further information.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

        Outstanding debt obligations are as follows:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Term Loan (for more information, see below.)

 $84,474 $76,520 

Revolving credit loan payable under Credit Agreement. The weighted average interest rate of all borrowings was 5.32% and 7.78% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. (For more information, see below.)

 39,000 22,300 

Borrowings under revolving credit facilities with a consortium of banks in Spain. (For more information, see below.)

 7,670 5,021 

Payment due for the Engineering S.A. acquisition

  5,327 

Borrowings under unsecured credit facility with Caja Badajoz (For more information, see below.)

 2,047  

2014 Term Loan Facility

 $119,700 $ 

2012 Term Loan Payable

  84,474 

2009 Revolving credit loan payable under the Credit Agreement (the weighted average interest rate of all borrowings was 5.32% at December 31, 2013

  39,000 

2014 Domestic Revolving Credit Facility

 200   

2014 International Revolving Credit Facility

 2,554   

Borrowings under revolving credit facilities with a consortium of banks in Spain

 5,037 7,670 

Borrowings under unsecured credit facility with Ibercaja Bank in Spain

 745 2,047 

Other notes payable

 68 267   68 
     

 133,259 109,435  128,236 133,259 

Less current maturities

 18,974 21,769  6,361 18,974 
     

Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current maturities

 $114,285 $87,666  $121,875 $114,285 
     
     


Revolving Credit Agreement
Refinancing

        TheOn June 12, 2014, the Company and its subsidiary Hill International N.V. (the "Subsidiary") entered into a Credit Agreement, dated June 30, 2009,Commitment Letter with Société Générale (the "Credit Agreement""Agent"), and SG Americas Securities, LLC, (the "Arranger") pursuant to which the Arranger and the Agent committed to provide secured debt facilities to the Company in an aggregate principal amount of $165,000,000 which would be used to payoff and terminate the Company's then-existing senior credit facility with a bank group led by Bank of America, N.A., and its then-existing second lien term loan with funds managed by Tennenbaum Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank N.A.Partners, LLC.

        Effective as of September 26, 2014 (the "Lenders""Closing Date"), and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "Agent").

        During 2011 and through the first quarter of 2012, the Company was in violation of certain financial covenants and subsequently entered into a series of waivers, forbearance agreements and amendments to the Credit Agreement. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company, entered into a second amendment to the Credit Agreement (the "Second Amendment"), dated March 6, 2012credit agreement with the Agent as administrative agent and Lenders. The Company incurred fees relatedcollateral agent, TD Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as documentation agent, (collectively, the "U.S. Lenders") consisting of a term loan facility of $120,000,000 (the "Term Loan Facility") and a $30,000,000 U.S. dollar-denominated facility available to the Second AmendmentCompany (the "U.S. Revolver," together with the Term Loan Facility, the "U.S. Credit Facilities") and a credit agreement with the Agent as administrative agent and collateral agent, (the "International Lender") providing a $15,000,000 Euro-denominated facility available to the Subsidiary (the "International Revolver" and together with the U.S. Revolver, the "Revolving Credit Facilities" and, together with the U.S. Credit Facilities, the "Secured Credit Facilities"). The U.S. Revolver and the International Revolver include sub-limits for letters of credit amounting to approximately $2,075,000 which were charged to interest expense$25,000,000 and related financing fees, net.$10,000,000, respectively.

        During the second quarter of 2012, the Company was in violation, under the Second Amendment, of certain financialThe Secured Credit Facilities contain customary default provisions, representations and warranties, and affirmative and negative covenants, and the covenant regarding restricted payments due to the payment of dividends by certain of the Company's subsidiaries to their noncontrolling interest parties.

        On October 18, 2012,require the Company entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the "Third Amendment"), pursuant to which the Agent and the Lenders agreed to waive the defaults noted above and the parties thereto, agreed, among other things, as follows:


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        The Company is required to comply with certain financial and reporting covenants. The financial covenants consist of a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated fixed charge ratioMaximum Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio and a senior leverage ratio.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        Consolidated funded indebtedness is the sum of the outstanding principal amount of all obligations for borrowed money, the par value of the term loan, all direct obligations arising under letters of credit under the Credit Agreement, all obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes, loan agreements, capital leases and guarantees of indebtedness of persons other than the Company or its subsidiaries.

        Consolidated EBITDA is an amount equalaggregate) to consolidated net income for the most recently completed four fiscal quarters plus (a) the following to the extent deducted in calculating such consolidated net income: consolidatedearnings before interest, charges, the provision for federal, state, local and foreign income taxes, payable, depreciation, and amortization expense, non-cash charges and (v) any deductions attributable to minority interests of third parties in non-wholly owned subsidiaries, except to the extent of cash dividends declared or paid to such minority interests minus (b) the following to the extent included in calculating such consolidated net income: federal, state, local and foreign income tax credits, all gains from investments recorded using the equity method, except to the extent of cash dividends or distributions received by the Company in respect of such investments and all non-cash items increasing consolidated net income for the most recently completed measurement period.

        The following tables set forth the requirements for the consolidated leverage ratio, consolidated fixed charge ratio and the senior leverage ratio.

Consolidated Leverage RatioConsolidated Fixed Charge RatioSenior Leverage Ratio
Period ending
Not to exceedPeriod endingNot less thanPeriod endingNot to exceed

December 31, 2013

6.00 to 1.00December 31, 20131.05 to 1.00December 31, 20132.25 to 1.00

Each quarter in 2014

5.75 to 1.00March 31, 20141.15 to 1.00Subsequent quarters2.25 to 1.00

Each quarter in 2015

5.50 to 1.00June 30, 20141.25 to 1.00

Subsequent quarters1.35 to 1.00

        The following table presents the Company's actual ratios at December 31, 2013:


Consolidated
Leverage Ratio
Consolidated Fixed
Charge Ratio
Senior
Leverage Ratio

4.19 to 1.002.03 to 1.001.67 to 1.00

        The Third Amendment also contains other covenants and certain restrictions relating to limitations on the ability of the Company or its subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, on the ability of the Company or its subsidiaries to make investments (including restrictions on the ability of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries to make loans to or investments in the Company's foreign subsidiaries) and acquisitions, on the ability of the Company to accumulate cash, declare or pay cash dividends to its stockholders, and on the ability of the Company's subsidiaries to declare or pay certain cash dividends. At December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of the loan covenants.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

amortization and share-based compensation for the trailing twelve months. The Excess Account Concentration covenant permits the U. S. Lenders and the International Lender to increase the interest rates by 2.0% if, as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, either (a) the accounts receivable from any country not listed as a Permitted Country as defined in the Secured Credit Facilities (other than the United Arab Emirates) that are more than 120 days old (relative to the invoice date) constitute more than 10% of the total outstanding accounts receivable or (b) accounts receivable from any individual client located in the United Arab Emirates that are more than 120 days old (relative to the invoice date) constitute more than 14% of the total outstanding accounts receivable; provided that, in each case, the accounts receivable due from clients located in Libya that exist as of the Closing Date shall be excluded for all purposes of this covenant. The interest rate will be reset as soon as the accounts receivable over 120 days decline below the 10% or 14% levels. At December 31, 2014, no client's accounts receivable exceeded the proscribed limits.

        The following tables set forth the Maximum Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio requirements for all reporting periods and the Company's actual ratio at December 31, 2014:

Period ending
 Not to exceed Actual 

December 31, 2014

  3.50  3.10 

March 31, 2015

  3.50    

June 30, 2015

  3.50    

September 30, 2015

  3.25    

December 31, 2015

  3.25    

March 31, 2016

  3.00    

June 30, 2016

  3.00    

September 30, 2016

  2.75    

December 31, 2016

  2.75    

March 31, 2017

  2.50    

June 30, 2017

  2.50    

September 30, 2017

  2.25    

December 31, 2017

  2.25    

March 31, 2018

  2.00    

June 30, 2018

  2.00    

September 30, 2018

  2.00    

December 31, 2018

  2.00    

Thereafter

  1.75    

        The U.S. Credit Facilities are guaranteed by certain U.S. subsidiaries of the Company, and the International Revolver is guaranteed by the Company and certain of the Company's U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries.

        In connection with the Third Amendment,Refinancing, the Company agreed to pay: (i) an amendment fee of 1.00% of the Lenders' aggregate commitments as of October 18, 2012, payable in two parts: 0.50%, or $325,000, on October 18, 2012 and 0.50%, or $325,000, on March 31, 2014, however the latter payment will be waived in the event that prior to March 31, 2014 the Company has paid in full all Obligations (as defined in the Credit Agreement) under the Credit Agreement (other than certain contingent obligations) and all commitments have been terminated under the Credit Agreement; (ii)wrote off deferred financing fees of $1,215,000; (iii) an arrangement fee of $100,000; and (iv) accrued default interest of $1,059,000. The Company also paid approximately $1,150,000 to the Agent as reimbursement for its out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with the Third Amendment. These costs amounting to approximately $4,174,000 in the aggregate were paid at closing and charged$1,482,000 by a charge to interest expense and related financing fees, net.

        On May 23, 2013 the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, the lenders agreed to : (a) permit the Company to enter into an Agreement with Qatar National Bank for the issuance of letters of credit ("LCs") not to exceed $17,000,000, (b) increase the limit on LCs available to the Company's foreign subsidiaries who are not loan parties from $4,000,000 to $11,800,000 and (c) permit the Company to provide up to $20,000,000 as cash collateral for letters of credit and performance bonds. The Company paid an amendment fee of $150,000 to the Agent and reimbursed the Agent for its out-of-pocket cost amounting to approximately $372,000. These amounts are included in interest expense and related financing fees, net in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

Term Loan Facility

        At December 31, 2013,The Company used the Company had $17,207,000 in outstanding letters of credit. Due to conditionsproceeds from the Term Loan Facility:

        The interest rate on the Term Loan AgreementFacility will be, at the Company's option, either:

        The "Base Rate" is a per annum rate equal to the highest of (A) the prime rate, (B) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, or (C) the LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.0% per annum. Upon a default, the applicable rate of interest under the Secured Credit Facilities may increase by 2.0%. The LIBOR on the Term Loan Facilities (including when determining the Base Rate) shall in no event be less than 1.0% per annum.

        The Company has the right to prepay the Term Loan Facility in full or in part at any time without premium or penalty; provided, however that upon the occurrence of prepayments relating to certain repricing transactions within the first year following closing, a 1.0% prepayment premium will be payable. The Company is required to make mandatory prepayments of the Term Loan Facility, without premium or penalty, (i) with net proceeds of any issuance or incurrence of indebtedness by the Company after the closing, (ii) with net proceeds from certain asset sales outside the ordinary course of business, and (iii) with 50% of the Third Amendment. Obligationsexcess cash flow (as defined in the agreement) for each fiscal year of the Borrowers commencing with the first full fiscal year ending after closing (which percentage would be reduced to 25% if the Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio is equal to or less than 2.25 to 1.00 or reduced to 0% if the Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio is equal to or less than 1.50 to 1.00).

        The Term Loan Agreement) underFacility is generally secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all assets of the Company and certain of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries other than accounts receivable, cash proceeds thereof and certain bank accounts, as to which the Term Loan Facility is secured by a second-priority security interest.

        The Term Loan Facility has a term of six years, requires repayment of 0.25% of the original principal amount on a quarterly basis commencing on December 31, 2014 and ending on September 30, 2020, and was fully funded at closing. Any amounts repaid on the Term Loan Facility will not be available to be re-borrowed.

        The Company incurred fees and expenses related to the Term Loan Facility aggregating $7,066,000 which has been deferred and the unamortized balance is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014. The deferred fees are being amortized to interest and related financing fees, net over a six-year period which commenced on October 1, 2014.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

Revolving Credit Facilities

        The Company is required to use the proceeds from the Revolving Credit Facilities:

        The interest rate on borrowings under the U.S. Revolver will be, at the Company's option from time to time, either the LIBOR for the relevant interest period plus 3.75% per annum or the Base Rate plus 2.75% per annum.

        The interest rate on borrowings under the International Revolver will be the European Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or "EURIBOR," for the relevant interest period (or at a substitute rate to be determined to the extent EURIBOR is not available) plus 4.00% per annum.

        The Company will pay a commitment fee calculated at 0.50% annually on the average daily unused portion of the U.S. Revolver, and the Subsidiary will pay a commitment fee calculated at 0.75% annually on the average daily unused portion of the International Revolver.

        The ability to borrow under each of the U.S. Revolver and the International Revolver is subject to a "borrowing base," calculated using a formula based upon approximately 85% of receivables that meet or satisfy certain criteria ("Eligible Receivables") and that are subject to a perfected security interest held by either the U.S. Lenders or the International Lender, plus, in the case of the International Revolver only, 10% of Eligible Receivables that are not subject to a perfected security interest held by the International Lender, subject to certain exceptions and restrictions.

        The Company or the Subsidiary, as applicable, will be required to make mandatory prepayments under their respective Revolving Credit Facilities to the extent that the aggregate outstanding amount thereunder exceeds the then-applicable borrowing base, which payments will be made without penalty or premium. At December 31, 2014, the domestic borrowing base was $28,975,000 and the international borrowing base was $15,000,000.

        Generally, the obligations of the Company under the U.S. Revolver are secured by a first-priority security interest in the above-referenced accounts receivable, cash proceeds and bank accounts of the Company and certain of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries, and a second-priority security interest in substantially all other assets of the Company and such subsidiaries. The obligations of the Subsidiary under the International Revolver would generally be secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all accounts receivable, cash proceeds thereof and certain bank accounts of the Subsidiary and certain of the Company's non-U.S. subsidiaries, and a second-priority security interest in substantially all other assets of the Company and certain of the Company's U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries.

        The Revolving Credit Facilities have a term of five years and require payment of interest only during the term. Under the Revolving Credit Facilities, outstanding loans may be repaid in whole or in


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

part at any time, without premium or penalty, subject to certain customary limitations, and will be available to be re-borrowed from time to time.

        The Company incurred fees and expenses related to the Revolving Credit Facilities aggregating $2,300,000 which has been deferred and the unamortized balance is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014. The deferred fees are being amortized to interest expense and related financing fees, net over a five-year period which commenced on October 1, 2014.

        At December 31, 2014, the Company had $16,836,000 of outstanding letters of credit and $11,939,000 of available borrowing capacity under the U.S. Revolver.

        At December 31, 2014, the Company had $6,722,000 of outstanding letters of credit and $10,086,000 of available borrowing capacity under the International Revolver and its other foreign credit agreements (See "Other Debt Arrangements" below for more information).

2012 Term Loan Agreement

        The Company entered into a Term Loan Agreement areon October 18, 2012, which was amended from time to time. Borrowings under the 2012 Term Loan Agreement were collateralized by a second lien (subject to the first/prior lien of the Agent under the Credit Agreement and to other Permitted Liens (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement)) on substantially all of the Company's assets, including, without limitation, accounts receivable, equipment, securities, financial assets and the proceeds of the foregoing, as well as by a pledge of 65% of the outstanding capital stock of ourits wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, Hill International N.V., and of certain of ourits other foreign subsidiaries. The maturity date of the Term Loan iswas scheduled for October 18, 2016.

        The Company paid interest on amounts outstanding at a rate per annum equal to 7.50%.

        Also, contemporaneous with its entry into the 2012 Term Loan Agreement, the Company entered into a Fee Letter. The Fee Letter required the Company to pay to the Lenders an exit fee (the "Exit Fee"), which fee was earned in full on the Closing Date and was due and payable on September 26, 2014, the date the 2012 Term Loan was paid in full (the "Exit Date"). The Exit Fee meant the amount, if any, when paid to the Term Loan Lenders on the Exit Date, that would result in the internal annual rate of return to the Term Loan Lenders on the Exit Date being equal to, but no greater than, 20%; provided that in no event would the Exit Fee amount be less than $0 or greater than $11,790,000. The IRR was to be calculated as the rate of return earned by the Term Loan Lenders on their initial investment in the 2012 Term Loan (calculated as the principal amount of the Term Loan less the Closing Fee of $25,000,000, or $75,000,000) through the Exit Date taking into account the payment by the Company to the Term Loan Lenders of all principal, interest and other payments to the Term Loan Lenders pursuant to the 2012 Term Loan Agreement. There was no Exit Fee payable upon the payoff and termination of the Term Loan.

        On August 6, 2014, the Company made a mandatory principal prepayment of $9,522,000 from funds received in the equity offering. On September 26, 2014, the Company paid $90,478,000 (including accelerated principal of $9,338,000 which was charged to interest expense and related financing fees, net for the year ended December 31, 2014), plus interest of $1,659,000, to payoff and terminate the Term Loan.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        Among other things, the Term Loan Agreement:

        At December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of the Term Loan covenants.

        In connection with the Term Loan Agreement, the Company agreed, under certain conditions, to allow certain Term Loan Lenders to appoint two non-voting observers to the Company's board of directors.

        The Company will pay interest on amounts outstanding from time to time under the Term Loan at a rate per annum equal to 7.50%; provided, however, such rate may be increased to 9.50% per annum if fixed price contracts (as defined under the Term Loan Agreement) or certain accounts receivable of the Company and its subsidiaries exceed percentages specified in the Term Loan Agreement.

        Also, contemporaneous with its entry into the Term Loan Agreement, the Company entered into a Fee Letter.Credit Agreement, dated June 30, 2009 (the "2009 Revolving Credit Agreement"), with Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The Fee Letter requiresPrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank N.A. (the "Lenders"), and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent which was amended from time to time.

        The maturity date of the 2009 Revolving Credit Agreement was scheduled for March 31, 2015. On September 26, 2014, the Company to pay to the Lenders an exit fee (the "Exit Fee"), which fee shall be earned in full on the Closing Date and due and payable on the date the Term Loan is paid in full (the "Exit Date"). "Exit Fee" means the amount, if any, when paid to the Term Loan Lenders on the Exit Date, that will result$25,500,000 (including $9,522,000 from funds received in the internal annual rateequity offering, plus interest of return (the "IRR")$420,000, to payoff and terminate the Term Loan Lenders (the "IRR") on the Exit Date being equal to, but no greater than, 20%;provided, that in no event shall the Exit Fee Amount be less than $0 or greater than $11,790,000. The IRR is to be calculated as the rate of return earned by the Term Loan Lenders on their initial investment in the Term Loan (to be calculated as the principal amount of the Term Loan less the Closing Fee of $25,000,000) through the Exit Date taking into account the payment by the Company to the Term Loan Lenders of all principal, interest and other payments to the Term Loan Lenders pursuant to the Term Loan2009 Revolving Credit Agreement.

        Additionally, the Company is required to make the following mandatory prepayments/payments and/or commitment reductions in respect of the Company's indebtedness under the Credit Agreement and under the Term Loan Agreement:


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        None of the payments received in 2013 from ODAC in connection with the "Net Libya Receivable" referred to above are payable under the Credit Agreement or the Term Loan because the amount was paid in Libyan dinars which is not a readily convertible currency. In addition, there were no sales of assets nor excess cash-flow (as defined in the "Third Amendment") generated in 2013.

        In connection with the Term Loan Agreement, the Company incurred approximately $609,000 of costs which were charged to interest expense and related financing costs, net in 2012. In addition, the Company incurred costs of approximately $2,975,000 in connection with establishing the Term Loan. Such costs have been deferred and will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the Term Loan.


Other Debt Arrangements

        The Company's subsidiary, Hill Spain,International (Spain) S.A. ("Hill Spain"), maintains a revolving credit facility with 12six banks (the "Financing Entities") in Spain providingwhich initially provided for total borrowings with interest at 6.50%, of up to €5,640,000 (approximately $7,788,000)with interest at 6.50% on outstanding borrowings. The original available amount was reduced to approximately 75.0% at December 31, 2013. As of2014 and will be reduced to 50.0% at December 31, 20132015. Additionally, the availability is reduced by €15,000 on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2014, the total facility was approximately €4,170,000 (approximately $5,071,000) and 2012, total borrowings outstanding were €5,554,000 and €3,796,000€4,142,000 (approximately $7,670,000 and $5,021,000, respectively)$5,037,000). The amount being financed ("Credit Contracts") by each Financing Entity is between €156,000varies from €284,000 (approximately $215,000)$346,000) and €689,000€1,319,000 (approximately $952,000)$1,604,000). The facility expires on December 17, 2016. The maximum available amount will be reduced to 75.0% at December 31, 2014 and to 50.0% at December 31, 2015. To guarantee Hill Spain's obligations resulting from the Credit Contracts, Hill Spain provided a guarantee in favor of each one of the Financing Entities which,and, additionally, and solely in the case of unremedied failure to make payment, and at the request of each of the Financing Entities, shall grant a first ranking pledge over a given percentage of corporate shares of Hill International Brasil Participacoes Ltda. for the principal, interest, fees, expenses or any other amount owed by virtue of the Credit Contracts, coinciding with the percentage of credit of each Financing Entityentity with respect to the total outstanding borrowings under this facility. The facility expires on December 17, 2016.

        Hill Spain also maintains an unsecured credit facility with the Caja Badajoz bankIbercaja Bank in Spain for €1,500,000€700,000 (approximately $2,071,000) as of$851,000) at December 31, 2013.2014. The availability will be reduced by €175,000 on a quarterly basis commencing on March 31, 2015. The interest rate at December 31, 2013 is 5.75%. The rate at December 31, 20122014 was the three-month EURIBOR rate of 0.54% plus 3.00% (or 3.54%) but no less than 5.00%6.75%. At December 31, 2013, €1,483,0002014, this facility had total borrowings outstanding of €613,000 (approximately $2,047,000) was outstanding. At$745,000). The facility expires on December 31, 2012 there were no borrowings outstanding. This facility was subsequently reduced to €1,000,000 on January 16, 2014 with an expiration date of December 23, 2014.2015.

        The Company also maintains a credit facility with the National Bank of Abu Dhabi which provides for total borrowings of up to AED 11,500,000 (approximately $3,131,000)$3,131,000 at December 31, 20132014) collateralized by certain overseas receivables. The interest rate is the one-month Emirates InterBank Offer Rate plus 3.00% (or 4.23% and 4.30%4.48% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively)2014) but no less than 5.50%. ThereAt December 31, 2014, there were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2013 or 2012.outstanding. This facility also allows for up to AED 150,000,000127,033,000 (approximately $40,839,000$34,589,000 at December 31, 2013)2014) in Letters of Guarantee of which AED 111,795,000 and AED 130,171,000116,506,000 (approximately $30,437,000 and $35,440,000, respectively)$31,741,000) were utilized at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.2014. This facility is being renewed on a month-to-month basis. The Company is in the process of negotiating a new credit facility.

        Engineering S.A. maintains three unsecured revolving credit facilities with two banks in Brazil aggregating 2,900,000 Brazilian Reais (approximately $1,091,000 at December 31, 2014), with a


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9—Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        The Company also maintains a revolving credit facility with Egnatia Bank for up to €1,000,000 (approximately $1,381,000weighted average interest rate of 3.99% per month at December 31, 2013), with interest rates of 0.23% and 1.19% plus Egnatia Bank's prime rate of 5.00% (or 5.23% and 6.19% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively), collateralized by certain assets of the Company.2014. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2013 or 2012. The facility also allows for letters of guarantee up to €4,500,000 (approximately $6,214,000) at December 31, 2013, of which €2,030,000 (approximately $2,804,000) and €1,388,000 (approximately $1,836,000) had been utilized at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The facility has an expiration date of April 30, 2014. The Company plans to renew this facility prior to the expiration date.

        Engineering S.A maintains three unsecured revolving credit facilities with two banks in Brazil aggregating 2,900,000 Brazilian Reais (BRL) (approximately $1,228,000) at December 31, 2013, with a weighted average monthly interest rate of 3.22% and 3.00% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding on any of these facilities which are renewed automatically every three months.

        A revolvingThe Company also maintains relationships with other foreign banks for the issuance of letters of credit, facility with Barclays Bank PLC for up to £550,000 (approximately $907,000) at December 31, 2013, with interestletters of 2.00% plus the Bankguarantee and performance bonds in a variety of England rate of 0.50% (or 2.50%) at December 31, 2013, collateralized by cross guarantees of several of the United Kingdom companies. Aggregate of all debt owing to the bank will be, at all times, covered 3 times by the aggregate value of the UK accounts receivable less than 90 days old and excluding any receivables which are due from any associate, subsidiary or overseas client.foreign currencies. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no borrowings2014, the maximum U.S. dollar equivalent of the commitments was $69,270,000 of which $24,723,000 is outstanding. This facility is on demand with no fixed expiration date. It is subject to an annual review on September 12, 2014.

        At December 31, 2013, the Company had $6,759,000 of available borrowing capacity under its foreign credit agreements.

        In connection with the acquisition of Engineering S.A., the Company incurred indebtedness to the sellers amounting to 17,200,000 Brazilian Reais (approximately $10,376,000 at the date of acquisition) and discounted that amount using an interest rate of 4.72%, the Company's weighted average interest rate at that time. The Company paid the first installment amounting to BR 6,624,000 (approximately $3,508,000) on April 30, 2012 and paid the second installment amounting to 11,372,000 BRL (approximately $5,095,000) on July 23, 2013.

        Scheduled maturities of long term debt are as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,
  
 

2014

 $18,974(1)

2015

  25,993 

2016

  88,229 

2017

  63 
    

Total debt

 $133,259 
    
    

(1)
Current maturities for 2014 include collections anticipated from Libya amounting to $14,933 which must be paid to the lenders under the terms of the Credit Agreement and Term Loan.
Years Ending December 31,
  
 

2015

 $6,361 

2016

  4,575 

2017

  1,200 

2018

  1,200 

2019

  1,200 

Thereafter

  113,700 

Total debt

 $128,236 

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 10—Supplemental Cash Flow Information

        At December 31, 2012, the Company included in other current liabilities €7,166,000 (approximately $9,477,000) related to its acquisition of an additional 23.9% interest in Hill Spain.

        The Company issues shares of its common stock to its non-employee directors as partial compensation for services on the Company's Board through the next annual stockholders meeting. Under its 2007 Restricted Stock Grant Plan, the Company issued shares of restricted common stock to certain executives. See Note 1211 for further information with respect to these plans.this plan.

        Other non-cash activity is provided in the following table:


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Interest and related financing fees paid

 $13,372 $16,952 $5,953  $22,753 $13,372 $16,952 
       
       

Income taxes paid

 $8,601 $4,443 $4,129  $11,903 $8,601 $4,443 
       
       

Increase in intangible assets and goodwill in connection with acquisitions of BCA and CPI

 $7,161 $ $ 
       

Reduction of noncontrolling interest in connection with acquisitions of an additional interest in Engineering S.A.

 (2,649)   
       

Increase in deferred income taxes in connection with the acquisition of noncontrolling interests in Hill Spain

 $460 $1,720 $3,499 
       

Increase in additional paid in capital from issuance of shares of common stock related to purchase of CPI

 618   
       

Common stock issued for acquisitions of BCA and CPI

 $4,450 $ $ 
       

Increase in additional paid in capital from issuance of shares of common stock form cashless exercise of stock options

 538   
       

Increase in intangible assets and goodwill in connection with acquisitions of Cadogans in 2014 and BCA and CPI in 2013

 $3,998 $7,161 $ 

Increase in deferred income taxes in connection with the acquisition of noncontrolling interests in Hill Spain

 $ $460 $1,720 

Common stock issued for acquisitions of BCA and CPI

 $ $4,450 $ 

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation

2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Plan

        The 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Plan covers 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Only the Company's Non-Employee Directors are eligible to receive grants under the plan. Information with respect to the plan's activity follows (in thousands):


 Years Ended
December 31,
  Years Ended
December 31,
 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Shares issued

 52 52 24  26 52 52 

Compensation expense

 $150 $150 $150  $175 $150 $150 

2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

        The Employee Stock Purchase Plan covers 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Eligible employees may purchase shares at 85% of the fair market value on the date of purchase. Information with respect to the plan's activity follows (in thousands):


 Years Ended
December 31,
  Years Ended
December 31,
 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Shares purchased

 51 37 149  55 51 37 

Aggregate purchase price

 $162 $105 $545  $197 $162 $105 

Compensation expense

 $24 $19 $96  $35 $24 $19 

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

2007 Restricted Stock Grant Plan

        The 2007 Restricted Stock Grant Plan covered 340,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Awards aggregating 335,000 shares were approved by the Compensation Committee on February 28, 2007. The shares vested annually over a five-year period commencing on February 28, 2008. Through December 31, 2013, the Company has issued 319,000317,000 shares of its common stock. Under the terms of the plan, no further grants may be made. Information with respect to the plan follows (in thousands):


 Years Ended
December 31,
  Years Ended
December 31,
 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Shares issued

  61 62 

Shares issued (canceled)

 (2)  61 

Compensation expense

 $ $180 $976  $(8)$ $180 

2006 Employee Stock Option Plan

        The 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended, covers 8,000,00010,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Under its terms, directors, officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to receive non-qualified and incentive stock options. Options granted to non-employee directors vest immediately and have a five year contractual term. Options granted to officers and employees vest over five years and have a seven-year contractual term. Generally, each option has an exercise price equal to the closing quoted market price of a share of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. For grants of incentive stock options, if the grantee owns, or is deemed to own, 10%


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

or more of the total voting power of the Company, then the exercise price shall be 110% of the closing quoted market price on the date of grant and the option will have a five-year contractual term. Options that are forfeited or expire are available for future grants. At December 31, 2013,2014, a total of 1,366,8442,057,474 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under the plan. On January 2, 2015, the Company issued options to purchase 500,000 shares of its common stock to the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. The options have an exercise price of $3.91 per share, vest over five years, have a seven-year contractual life and have a fair value of $1,010,000. On January 27, 2015 the Company issued options to purchase 525,000 shares of its common stock to various executives. The options have an exercise price of $4.04 per share, vest over five years, have a seven-year contractual life and have a fair value of $1,087,000.

        The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to estimate the fair value of the options. The following table summarizes the fair value of options granted during 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 and the assumptions used to estimate the fair value:


 December 31, December 31,

 2013 2012 2011 2014 2013 2012

Average expected life (years)

 4.29 3.66 4.05 4.59 4.29 3.66

Forfeiture range

 0 - 5.0% 0% 0 - 10.5% 0 - 5.0% 0 - 5.0% 0%

Weighted average forfeiture rate

 0.9% 0% 1.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0%

Dividends

 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Volatility range

 67.8 - 73.5% 70.8 - 78.4% 44.6 - 67.5% 61.5 - 65.5% 67.8 - 73.5% 70.8 - 78.4%

Weighted average volatility

 71.7% 77.5% 52.6% 62.9% 71.7% 77.5%

Range of risk-free interest rates

 0.50 - 1.36% 0.36 - 0.86% 0.91 - 2.37% 0.86 - 1.74% 0.50 - 1.36% 0.36 - 0.86%

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

 0.77% 0.80% 1.57% 1.67% 0.77% 0.8%

Weighted average fair value at grant date

 $1.95 $2.52 $2.58 $2.28 $1.95 $2.52

        The expected term of the options is estimated based on the "simplified method" as permitted by SAB No. 110. Expected volatility was calculated using the average historical volatility of similar public companies through June 30, 2011 and of the Company thereafter. The risk-free interest rate is based


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

on U.S. Treasury yields for securities in effect at the time of grants with terms approximating the term of the grants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model are highly subjective, particularly as to stock price volatility of the underlying stock, which can materially affect the resulting valuation.

        A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

 
 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

(in thousands, except exercise price and remaining life data)

             

Outstanding, December 31, 2010

  2,708  4.50       

Granted

  1,264  6.96       

Exercised

  (16) 2.45       

Expired

  (76) 6.00       

Forfeited

  (59) 4.51       
             

Outstanding, December 31, 2011

  3,821  5.29       

Granted

  994  5.17       

Exercised

  (10) 2.45       

Expired

  (117) 7.48       

Forfeited

  (44) 4.94       
             

Outstanding, December 31, 2012

  4,644 $5.22       

Granted

  2,076  3.80       

Exercised

  (8) 2.45       

Expired

  (101) 12.42       

Forfeited

  (37) 4.02       
             

Outstanding, December 31, 2013

  6,574  4.67  3.03 $ 
          
          

Exercisable, December 31, 2013

  3,033 $5.31  1.87 $ 
          
          

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

(in thousands, except exercise price and remaining life data)
 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding, December 31, 2011

  3,821  5.29       

Granted

  994  5.17       

Exercised

  (10) 2.45       

Expired

  (117) 7.48       

Forfeited

  (44) 4.94       

Outstanding, December 31, 2012

  4,644  5.22       

Granted

  2,076  3.80       

Exercised

  (8) 2.45       

Expired

  (101) 12.42       

Forfeited

  (37) 4.02       

Outstanding, December 31, 2013

  6,574 $4.67       

Granted

  1,849  4.57       

Exercised

  (524) 3.00       

Expired

  (496) 7.66       

Forfeited

  (44) 4.37       

Outstanding, December 31, 2014

  7,359  4.57  3.19 $ 

Exercisable, December 31, 2014

  3,302 $5.23  1.72 $ 

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise prices and the closing stock price on December 31, 2013.2014. At December 31, 2013,2014, the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options was $4.67$4.57 and the closing stock price was $3.95.$3.84.

        For various price ranges, weighted average characteristics of outstanding stock options at December 31, 2013 are as follows:

 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
Exercise Prices
 Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2013
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Number
Exercisable at
December 31,
2013
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

$2.45

  726,000  2.19 $2.45  577,000 $2.45 

2.70

  200,000  0.18  2.70  200,000  2.70 

2.85

  113,635  3.45  2.85  113,635  2.85 

2.89

  116,280  4.43  2.89  116,280  2.89 

3.12

  10,000  6.60  3.12     

3.67

  925,000  6.06  3.67     

3.89

  5,000  4.39  3.89  2,000  3.89 

4.04

  1,000,000  4.06  4.04     

4.12

  104,895  0.44  4.12  104,895  4.12 

4.19

  25,000  2.13  4.19  20,000  4.19 

4.25

  106,085  2.42  4.25  106,085  4.25 

4.37

  10,000  2.34  4.37  8,000  4.37 

4.92

  5,000  2.59  4.92  4,000  4.92 

5.29

  10,000  4.25  5.29  4,000  5.29 

5.31

  20,000  3.07  5.31  12,000  5.31 

5.47

  880,200  3.18  5.47  220,050  5.47 

5.73

  10,000  4.84  5.73  4,000  5.73 

5.83

  265,000  3.25  4.84  159,000  5.83 

6.31

  266,725  3.96  6.31  143,725  6.31 

6.32

  10,000  1.84  6.32  10,000  6.32 

6.41

  320,000  1.24  6.41  240,000  6.41 

6.50

  5,000  4.13  6.50  2,000  6.50 

7.32

  907,336  2.07  7.32  453,668  7.32 

7.43

  40,000  0.71  7.43  40,000  7.43 

7.57

  9,000  0.35  7.57  9,000  7.57 

7.67

  424,000  0.16  7.67  424,000  7.67 

11.10

  20,000  1.08  11.10  20,000  11.10 

12.82

  30,000  1.12  12.82  30,000  12.82 

16.79

  10,000  1.59  16.79  10,000  16.79 
               

  6,574,156  3.03 $4.67  3,033,338 $5.31 
            
            

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        For various price ranges, weighted average characteristics of outstanding stock options at December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
Exercise
Prices
 Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2014
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Number
Exercisable at
December 31,
2014
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
$2.45  559,489  1.17 $2.45  559,489 $2.45 
 2.85  90,908  2.45  2.85  90,908  2.85 
 2.89  116,280  3.43  2.89  116,280  2.89 
 3.12  10,000  5.60  3.12  2,000  3.12 
 3.67  888,000  5.06  3.67  172,000  3.67 
 3.89  3,000  4.39  3.89  3,000  3.89 
 3.95  500,000  6.01  3.95     
 4.04  1,000,000  3.06  4.04  250,000  4.04 
 4.19  25,000  1.13  4.19  25,000  4.19 
 4.25  84,868  0.42  4.25  84,868  4.25 
 4.35  500,000  4.01  4.35     
 4.37  10,000  1.34  4.37  10,000  4.37 
 4.92  5,000  1.59  4.92  5,000  4.92 
 4.95  775,000  6.19  4.95     
 5.31  20,000  2.07  5.31  16,000  5.31 
 5.47  880,200  2.18  5.47  440,100  5.47 
 5.73  8,000  3.84  5.73  4,000  5.73 
 5.83  265,000  2.25  5.83  212,000  5.83 
 6.31  261,725  2.95  6.31  181,725  6.31 
 6.32  10,000  0.84  6.32  10,000  6.32 
 6.41  320,000  0.24  6.41  320,000  6.41 
 6.50  3,000  0.12  6.50  3,000  6.50 
 6.61  63,870  4.45  6.61  63,870  6.61 
 7.32  907,336  1.07  7.32  680,502  7.32 
 11.10  20,000  0.08  11.10  20,000  11.10 
 12.82  22,500  0.12  12.82  22,500  12.82 
 16.79  10,000  0.59  16.79  10,000  16.79 
    7,359,176  3.19 $4.57  3,302,242 $5.23 

In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, the Company recorded share-based compensation related to stock options of approximately $3,292,000, $2,787,000 $2,107,000 and $1,845,000,$2,107,000, respectively, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 11—Share-Based Compensation (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the Company's non-vested stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011:2012:

(in thousands, except weighted average
grant date fair value)

 Options Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
  Options Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 

Non-vested options at December 31, 2010

 1,786 1.87 

Granted

 1,264 2.58 

Vested

 (577) 2.08 

Forfeited

 (59) 1.94 
     

Non-vested options at December 31, 2011

 2,414 2.23  2,414 2.23 

Granted

 994 2.52  994 2.52 

Vested

 (881) 2.12  (881) 2.12 

Forfeited

 (44) 2.15  (44) 2.15 
     

Non-vested options at December 31, 2012

 2,483 2.39  2,483 2.39 

Granted

 2,076 1.95  2,076 1.95 

Vested

 (981) 2.14  (981) 2.14 

Forfeited

 (37) 2.17  (37) 2.17 
     

Non-vested options at December 31, 2013

 3,541 $2.20  3,541 2.20 
     

Granted

 1,849 2.28 

Vested

 (1,289) 2.19 

Forfeited

 (44) 2.33 

Non-vested options at December 31, 2014

 4,057 $2.24 
     

        At December 31, 2013,2014, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options was $5,432,000$6,153,000 and will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average service period of 1.861.96 years.

Note 12—Stockholders' Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

        Under its stock repurchase program, the Company is authorized to purchase shares of its common stock up to a total purchase price of $60,000,000. To date, the Company has purchased 5,834,369 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $24,438,000, or an average of approximately $4.19 per share. Under the terms of its Secured Credit AgreementFacilities (see Note 9), the Company may make additional purchases up to an aggregate of $2,000,000$3,000,000 as long as immediately before and after giving effect to the purchase, the Company shall have satisfied the Minimum Liquidity Requirement (see Note 9) and no event of default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time.

Other

        On March 7, 2014, the Company issued 171,308 shares of its common stock aggregating $618,000 to the former shareholders of Collaborative Partners, Inc. as payment for equity in excess of that required under the acquisition agreement.

        In March 2014, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer exercised 200,000 options with an exercise price of $2.70 through the Company on a cashless basis. The Company withheld 112,788 shares as payment for the options and placed those shares in treasury stock. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer received 87,212 shares from this transaction.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 12—Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

        On August 6, 2014, in connection with the Refinancing (See Note 9), the Company sold 9,546,629 shares of its common stock in an underwritten equity offering and received net proceeds aggregating approximately $38,078,000, of which two mandatory prepayments of $9,522,402 were used to pay down the 2012 Term Loan Agreement and the 2009 Revolving Credit Agreement.

        We have an effective registration statement on Form S-3 on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") which registered 20,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance and sale by us at various times in the future. The proceeds, if any, will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, subject to the restrictions of our amendedSecured Credit Agreement.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 12—Stockholders' Equity (Continued)Facilities.

        In addition, we have an effective registration statement on Form S-4 on file with the SEC which registered 8,000,00020,000,000 shares of our common stock, which includes 6,438,923 shares of our common stock registered under a previous Form S-4, for use in future acquisitions. During 2013, we issued 1,389,769 shares in connection with our acquisitions of BCA and CPI. During 2014, we issued 171,308 shares in connection with certain additional consideration for CPI. We expect to issue additional shares of our common stock in connection with certain additional consideration and contingent consideration for those two companies.

Note 13—Income Taxes

        The effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were (697.9%), 63.0% and 2011 were 63.0%, (104.2%) and 55.6%, respectively. The difference in the Company's 2014 effective tax rate compared to the 2013 rate is primarily related to a significant increase in the U.S. pretax loss in 2014 primarily due to the recognition of an additional $10,820,000 of interest expense related to the refinancing and early termination of the Company's former senior credit facility and term loan during the third quarter of 2014. For all the years presented, the Company's effective tax rate is significantly higher than it otherwise would be primarily as a result of not being able to record an income tax benefit related to the U.S. net operating loss and various foreign withholding taxes. This was partially offset in 2013 and 2014 by approximately $2,500,000 of reversal for uncertain tax positions based on management's assessment that those items were effectively settled with a foreign jurisdiction.

        The difference in the Company's 2013 effective tax rate over 2012 was primarily the result of not recording an income tax benefit related to the 2013 U.S. net operating loss which management believes the Company will not be able to utilize. In addition, the Company recognized higher income tax expense related to withholding taxes on certain foreign operations. These items were partially offset by the $2,473,000 reversal for uncertain tax positions based on management's assessment that those items were effectively settled with a foreign jurisdiction.

        The components of earnings (loss) before income taxes by United States and foreign jurisdictions were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

United States

 $(26,460)$(19,172)$(24,438)

Foreign jurisdictions

  36,054  6,269  13,317 
        

 $9,594 $(12,903)$(11,121)
        
        

        Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following:


 Current Deferred Total  Years Ended December 31, 

 (in thousands)
  2014 2013 2012 

Year ended December 31, 2013:

       

U.S. federal

 $ $ $ 

State and local

    

 (in thousands)
 

United States

 $(39,635)$(26,460)$(19,172)

Foreign jurisdictions

 7,245 (1,202) 6,043  38,430 36,054 6,269 
       

 $7,245 $(1,202)$6,043 
        $(1,205)$9,594 $(12,903)
       

Year ended December 31, 2012:

       

U.S. federal

 $285 $10,586 $10,871 

State and local

 (12) (1,684) (1,696)

Foreign jurisdictions

 7,913 (3,646) 4,267 
       

 $8,186 $5,256 $13,442 
       
       

Year ended December 31, 2011:

       

U.S. federal

 $171 $(6,084)$(5,913)

State and local

 289 (1,560) (1,271)

Foreign jurisdictions

 5,157 (4,159) 998 
       

 $5,617 $(11,803)$(6,186)
       
       

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13—Income Taxes (Continued)

        Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following:

 
 Current Deferred Total 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Year ended December 31, 2014:

          

U.S. federal

 $ $ $ 

State and local

       

Foreign jurisdictions

  10,036  (1,625) 8,411 

 $10,036 $(1,625)$8,411 

Year ended December 31, 2013:

          

U.S. federal

 $ $ $ 

State and local

       

Foreign jurisdictions

  7,245  (1,202) 6,043 

 $7,245 $(1,202)$6,043 

Year ended December 31, 2012:

          

U.S. federal

 $285 $10,586 $10,871 

State and local

  (12) (1,684) (1,696)

Foreign jurisdictions

  7,913  (3,646) 4,267 

 $8,186 $5,256 $13,442 

        The increase in the expense for 2014 over 2013 results from increased pretax profits from foreign operations, the mix of tax rates in those jurisdictions and no offsetting tax benefits arising from the Company's U.S. net operating losses which management believes the Company will not be able to utilize.

        The differences between income taxes based on the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate and the Company's effective income tax rate are provided in the following reconciliation.


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Statutory federal income tax

 $3,262 $(4,387)$(3,781) $(410)$3,262 $(4,387)

Foreign tax benefit for earnings taxed at lower rates

 (3,907) 1,837 (4,236) (2,285) (3,907) 1,837 

Reversal of foreign net operating loss carry forward

   5,544 

Change in the valuation allowance

 10,783 18,258 (3,894) 15,409 10,783 18,258 

Net liability (reductions) additions for uncertain tax positions

 (2,314) (350) (906) (2,379) (2,314) (350)

Settlement of tax audits

   437 

Excess compensation

 204 170 170  646 204 170 

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 (1,476) (1,065) (790) (2,076) (1,476) (1,065)

Stock options

 230 (356) 570  224 230 (356)

Minority interest

   353 

Deferred tax adjustment

  (497) 27    (497)

Purchase accounting reversal

 (490)   

Reversal of interest allocations to foreign entities

 (1,014)     (1,014)  

Other

 275 (168) 320  (228) 275 (168)
       

Total

 $6,043 $13,442 $(6,186) $8,411 $6,043 $13,442 
       
       

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13—Income Taxes (Continued)

        The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Deferred tax assets:

          

Net operating loss carry forward—U.S. operations

 $25,185 $15,340  $40,065 $25,185 

Amortization of intangibles

 6,657 7,626  7,329 6,657 

Net operating loss carry forward—foreign operations

 6,389 5,590  8,558 6,389 

Compensated absences

 2,574 2,358  2,458 2,574 

Foreign income taxes on currency translation

 1,007  

Share based compensation

 2,087 1,984  3,026 2,087 

Labor contingencies

 71 1,438 

Allowance for uncollectible accounts

 933 1,360  1,003 933 

Bonus accrual

 1,373 998  1,087 1,373 

Deferred income

 19 714  485 19 

Foreign tax credit

 956 668  982 956 

Marketable securities

 244 422 

Other

 356 536  875 671 
     

Total gross deferred tax assets

 46,844 39,034  66,875 46,844 

Valuation allowances

 (31,257) (22,421) (49,254) (31,257)
     

Net deferred tax assets

 15,587 16,613  17,621 15,587 
     

Deferred tax liabilities:

          

Intangible assets

 (14,013) (15,468) (13,205) (14,013)

Depreciation

 (1,512) (1,471) (1,297) (1,512)

Prepaid expenses

 (632) (689) (1,159) (632)

Change in tax method

 (369) (101) (279) (369)

Foreign income taxes on currency translations

 (575) (47)  (575)
     

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

 (17,101) (17,776) (15,940) (17,101)
     

Net deferred tax liabilities

 $(1,514)$(1,163)
     

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 $1,681 $(1,514)
     

Amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets:

          

Current deferred tax assets

 $1,705 $2,187  $1,188 $1,705 

Non-current deferred tax assets

 13,882 14,426  15,426 13,882 

Current deferred tax liabilities

 (369) (101) (279) (369)

Non-current deferred tax liabilities

 (16,732) (17,675) (14,654) (16,732)
     

 $(1,514)$(1,163)
      $1,681 $(1,514)
     

        In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. Management evaluates the need for valuation allowances on the deferred tax assets according to the provisions of ASC 740,Income Taxes. They consider both positive and negative evidence. In making this


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13—Income Taxes (Continued)

provisions of ASC 740,Income Taxes. They consider both positive and negative evidence. In making this determination, management assesses all of the evidence available at the time including recent earnings, internally-prepared income projections, and historical financial performance.

        At December 31, 2012, due to recurring net operating losses in the United States, management determined that it was more likely than not that the Company would not be able to utilize its U.S.-related deferred tax assets. As a consequence, theThe Company continues to generate U.S. net operating losses and has recorded aadditional valuation allowance of $17,707,000 at that time. In 2013, the Company recorded an additional U.S. deferred tax assetallowances of $9,062,000 primarily related to a U.S.-based net operating loss of $24,902,000. Consequently, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowanceand $15,319,000 at December 31, 2013 of $9,062,000.and 2014, respectively. As a result, the U.S. deferred tax assets, net of U.S. basedU.S.-based deferred tax liabilities, are fully reserved at December 31, 2013 are fully reserved. The total valuation allowance related to the U.S. deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013 is $26,769,000.2014. Cumulative U.S. federal and state net operating losses at December 31, 20132014 are $63,365,000$101,071,000 and $66,472,000,$104,076,000, respectively.

        At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, there were approximately $24,013,000$33,933,000 and $20,337,000,$24,013,000, respectively, of gross foreign net operating loss carry forwards. The majority of these net operating loss carry forwards have an unlimited carry forward period. A valuation allowance of $4,489,000$7,167,000 and $4,714,000$4,489,000 was recorded at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, related to the foreign net operating losses in certain jurisdictions. It is anticipated that these losses will not be utilized due to continuing losses in these jurisdictions.

        The Company has made no provision for U.S. taxes on $119,416,000$147,997,000 of cumulative earnings of foreign subsidiaries as those earnings are intended to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time.time and are not intended to be distributed to the U.S. Upon distribution of these earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject to U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. It is not practical, however, to estimate the amount of taxes that may be payable on the eventual repatriation of these earnings.

        In 2013, deferred tax assets and additional paid in capital were reduced by $583,000 and in 2012, deferred tax assets and additional paid in capital were increased by $161,000 to record the differential between book expense and tax expense related to the vesting of restricted stock.

        The Company will recognize a tax benefit in the financial statements for an uncertain tax position only if management's assessment is that the position is "more likely than not" (i.e., a likelihood greater than 50 percent) to be allowed by the tax jurisdiction based solely on the technical merits of the position. The term "tax position" refers to a position in a previously filed tax return or a position expected to be taken in a future tax return that is reflected in measuring current or deferred income tax assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.

        The following table indicates the changes to the Company's uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 including interest and penalties:

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2014 2013 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Balance, beginning of year

 $2,933 $5,033 

Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years

  (2,683) (2,473)

Additions based on tax positions related to prior years

  725  373 

Balance, end of year

 $975 $2,933 

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13—Income Taxes (Continued)

        The following table indicates the changes to the Company's uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 including interest and penalties:

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2013 2012 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Balance, beginning of year

 $5,033 $5,383 

Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations

    (378)

Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years

  (2,473)  

Additions based on tax positions related to prior years

  373  28 
      

Balance, end of year

 $2,933 $5,033 
      
      

        The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company generally is no longer subject to U.S. federal,or state or foreign examinations by tax authorities for taxtaxable years prior to 2010.2011. However, net operating losses utilized for prior years in subsequent year's tax returns are subject to examination until three years after the filing of subsequent year's tax return. The statute of limitations expiration in foreign jurisdictions for corporate tax returns generally ranges between two and five years depending on the jurisdiction.

        The Company's policy is to record income tax related interest and penalties in income tax expense. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Company has accrued $172,000$520,000 and $100,000,$172,000, respectively, related to potential interest and penalties.

        The Company's income tax returns are based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examinations by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. While the Company believes it has appropriate support for the positions taken on its tax returns, the Company regularly assesses the potential outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of its provision for income taxes. As part of its assessment of potential adjustments to its tax returns, the Company increases its current tax liability to the extent an adjustment would result in a cash tax payment or decreases its deferred tax assets to the extent an adjustment would not result in a cash tax payment. The Company continually assesses the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjusts the income tax provision, the current tax liability and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.

Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies

General Litigation

        M.A. Angeliades, Inc. ("Plaintiff") has filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of New York against the Company and the New York City Department of Design and Construction ("DDC") regarding payment of approximately $8,771,000 for work performed as a subcontractor to the Company plus interest and other costs. The Company has accrued approximately $2,340,000, including interest of $448,000, based on invoices received from Plaintiff who has refused to provide invoices for the additional work that Plaintiff claims to have performed. Until such time as the Company obtains invoices for the additional work and is able to provide those invoices to DDC for reimbursement or there is a full resolution of the litigation, it has no intention of paying Plaintiff. The Company believes that its position is defensible, however, there can be no assurance that it will receive a favorable verdict should this case proceed to trial.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        From time to time, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions which arise in the normal course of business. As such the Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of the provision required for these commitments and contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful analysis of each matter. The provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes in circumstances. Changes in the provision could increase or decrease the Company's earnings in the period the changes are made. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        The Company enters into agreements with banks for the banks to issue bonds to clients or potential clients for three separate purposes as follows:

        The maximum potential future payment under these arrangements at December 31, 20132014 was $71,433,000.$80,022,000.

        Cash held in restricted accounts as collateral for the issuance of performance and advance payment bonds and letters of credit at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $16,007,000 and 2012 were $18,506,000, and $21,226,000, respectively.

Acquisition-related

        On February 28, 2011, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Hill Spain acquired an indirect 60% interest in Engineering S.A. ("ESA"), a firm located in Brazil, for cash amounting to 22,200,000 Brazilian Reais ("BR") (approximately $11,757,000). Minimum additional payments were made on April 30, 2012 in the amount of BR 6,624,000 (approximately $3,508,000 on that date) and on July 23, 2013 in the amount of BR 11,372,000 (approximately $5,095,000). Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to pay BR 5,000,000 (approximately $2,468,000 at December 31, 2012) in


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

addition to the minimum payments. Also, ESA's shareholders entered into an agreement whereby the minority shareholders have a right to compel ("ESA Put Option") Hill Spain to purchase any or all of their shares during the period from February 28, 2014 to February 28, 2021. Hill Spain also has the right to compel ("ESA Call Option") the minority shareholders to sell any or all of their shares during the same time period. The purchase price for such shares shall be seven times the earnings before interest and taxes for ESA's most recently ended fiscal year, net of any financial debt plus excess cash multiplied by a percentage which the shares to be purchased bear to the total number of shares outstanding at the time of purchase, but in the event the ESA Call Option is exercised by Hill Spain, the purchase price shall be increased by five percent. The ESA Put Option and the ESA Call Option


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14—Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

must be made within three months after the audited financial statements of ESA have been completed.

        The Company is committed to issue shares of its common stock to the former shareholders of BCA in satisfaction of the Third Tranche Payment, the amount of which will be determined in mid-2014. See Note 3.

        The Company is committed to issue shares of its common stock to the former shareholders of CPI for certain contingent consideration. The number of shares will be determined at various times during 2014. See Note 3.

        The Company is committed to pay additional consideration for the purchase of Cadogans in the amount of £519,000 to be paid in cash on October 31, 2015 and an earn out based upon the average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the two-year period ending on October 31, 2016 (which amount shall not be less than £0 nor more than £200,000). See Note 3.

Other

        On December 31, 2012, the Company identified a potential employment tax liability related to certain foreign subsidiaries' treatment of certain individuals as independent contractors rather than as employees. On June 24, 2013, the Company received an indemnification from the selling shareholders for periods prior to 2013. Accordingly, the Company has reversed the accrual established in 2012 and has reflected approximately $3,600,000 as a credit to selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. In consideration for the indemnification, the Company reversed the 2013 first quarter write-down of the liabilities for the second installment obligation of approximately 1,950,000 BRL (approximately $873,000). In addition, the Company believes, based upon certain professional advice that it is remote that a future liability will be established for the potential employment taxes relating to certain foreign independent contractors and, therefore, has made no accrual for such potential liability.

Note 15—Operating Leases

        The Company has numerous operating leases which have various expiration dates through September 28, 2022.April 30, 2027. Rent expense was approximately $13,902,000, $12,408,000 $12,538,000 and $13,329,000$12,538,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings. The Company is required to pay property taxes, utilities and other costs related to several of its leased office facilities.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 15—Operating Leases (Continued)

        At December 31, 2013,2014, approximate future minimum payments under these leases that have remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,
  
   
 

2014

 10,577 

2015

 7,555  12,422 

2016

 5,458  9,143 

2017

 4,243  7,665 

2018

 3,014  6,097 

2019

 4,897 

Thereafter

 5,721  15,270 
   

Total

 $36,568  $55,494 
   
   

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 16—Benefit Plans

        The Company maintains a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan") for qualified employees. The terms of the 401(k) Plan define qualified employees as those over 21 years of age. Through April 30, 2012, the Company matched 50% of the employee contributions up to 6% of employee compensation. Effective May 1, 2012, the Company suspended its matching contribution. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company matches 50% of employee contributions up to 2% of employee compensation up to a maximum $2,550. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, the Company recognized expense amounting to $801,000, $734,000 $666,000 and $1,828,000,$666,000, respectively, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Note 17—Business Segment Information

        The Company's business segments reflect how executive management makes resource decisions and assesses its performance. The Company bases these decisions on the type of services provided (Project Management and Construction Claims) and secondarily by their geography (U.S./Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia/Pacific).

        The Project Management business segment provides extensive construction and project management services to construction owners worldwide. Such services include program management, project management, construction management, project management oversight, troubled project turnaround, staff augmentation, project labor agreement consulting, commissioning, estimating and cost management, and labor compliance services.

        The Construction Claims business segment provides such services as claims consulting, management consulting, litigation support, expert witness testimony, cost/damages assessment, delay/disruption analysis, adjudication, lender advisory, risk management, forensic accounting, fraud investigation and Project Neutral services to clients worldwide.

        The Company evaluates the performance of its segments primarily on operating profit before corporate overhead allocations and income taxes.


Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 17—Business Segment Information (Continued)

        The following tables reflect the required disclosures for the Company's reportable segments (in thousands):

Consulting Fee Revenue ("CFR")


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Project Management

 $392,602 76.7%$312,232 74.8%$290,787 72.8% $427,515 74.2%$392,602 76.7%$312,232 74.8%

Construction Claims

 119,483 23.3 105,366 25.2 108,467 27.2  148,290 25.8 119,483 23.3 105,366 25.2 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

Total Revenue:

 
 2013 2012 2011 

Project Management

 $452,517  78.5%$372,281  77.4%$389,715  77.7%

Construction Claims

  124,164  21.5  108,500  22.6  111,741  22.3 
              

Total

 $576,681  100.0%$480,781  100.0%$501,456  100.0%
              
              

Operating Profit (Loss):

 
 2013 2012 2011 

Project Management before equity in earnings of affiliates

 $48,682 $23,273 $17,673 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

      190 
        

Total Project Management

  48,682  23,273  17,863 

Construction Claims

  12,171  8,071  9,488 

Corporate

  (28,395) (26,097) (31,210)
        

Total

 $32,458 $5,247 $(3,859)
        
        

Depreciation and Amortization Expense:


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

Project Management

 $7,677 $9,172 $11,935  $486,442 76.0%$452,517 78.5%$372,281 77.4%

Construction Claims

 2,852 2,998 3,345  153,839 24.0 124,164 21.5 108,500 22.6 
       

Subtotal segments

 10,529 12,170 15,280 

Corporate

 227 260 360 
       

Total

 $10,756 $12,430 $15,640  $640,281 100.0%$576,681 100.0%$480,781 100.0%
       
       

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 17—Business Segment Information (Continued)

Operating Profit:

 
 2014 2013 2012 

Project Management

 $48,516 $48,682 $23,273 

Construction Claims

  10,996  12,171  8,071 

Corporate

  (30,232) (28,395) (26,097)

Total

 $29,280 $32,458 $5,247 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense:

 
 2014 2013 2012 

Project Management

 $6,888 $7,677 $9,172 

Construction Claims

  2,719  2,852  2,998 

Subtotal segments

  9,607  10,529  12,170 

Corporate

  216  227  260 

Total

 $9,823 $10,756 $12,430 

Consulting Fee Revenue by Geographic Region:


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

U.S./Canada

 $121,291 23.7%$117,593 28.2%$115,378 28.9% $125,691 21.8%$121,291 23.7%$117,593 28.2%

Latin America

 49,188 9.6 51,820 12.4 48,188 12.1  40,844 7.1 49,188 9.6 51,820 12.4 

Europe

 75,398 14.7 84,267 20.2 90,049 22.5  79,009 13.7 75,398 14.7 84,267 20.2 

Middle East

 219,315 42.8 134,037 32.1 108,720 27.2  270,924 47.1 219,315 42.8 134,037 32.1 

Africa

 22,744 4.4 13,591 3.3 17,451 4.4  23,849 4.1 22,744 4.4 13,591 3.3 

Asia/Pacific

 24,149 4.8 16,290 3.8 19,468 4.9  35,488 6.2 24,149 4.8 16,290 3.8 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

U.S.

 $117,740 23.0%$114,368 27.4%$112,098 28.1% $122,096 21.2%$117,740 23.0%$114,368 27.4%

Non-U.S.

 394,345 77.0 303,230 72.6 287,156 71.9  453,709 78.8 394,345 77.0 303,230 72.6 
             

Total

 $512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%$399,254 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

        For the year ended December 31, 2014, consulting fee revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $73,329,000 representing 12.7% of the total and Oman's consulting fee revenue amounted to $66,896,000 representing 11.6% of the total. No other country except for the United States accounted for over 10% of consolidated consulting fee revenue.

        For the year ended December 31, 2013, consulting fee revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $66,918,000 representing 13.1% of the total and Oman's consulting fee revenue amounted to $51,053,000 representing 10.0% of the total. ExceptNo other country except for the United States no other country accounted for over 10% of consolidated consulting fee revenue.

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, consulting fee revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $61,729,000 representing 14.8% of the total and Brazil's consulting fee revenue amounted to $45,663,000 representing 10.9% of the total. Except for the United States, no other country accounted for over 10% of consolidated consulting fee revenue.

        For the year ended December 31, 2011, consulting fee revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $66,147,000 representing 16.6% of the total and Brazil's consulting fee revenue amounted to $42,688,000 representing 10.7% of the total. Except for the United States, no other country accounted for over 10% of consolidated consulting fee revenue.

Total Revenue by Geographic Region:

 
 2013 2012 2011 

U.S./Canada

 $171,012  29.7%$167,682  34.9%$207,906  41.5%

Latin America

  49,546  8.6  52,046  10.8  48,547  9.7 

Europe

  80,062  13.9  90,624  18.8  95,227  19.0 

Middle East

  224,716  39.0  138,731  28.9  110,683  22.1 

Africa

  26,186  4.5  15,303  3.2  19,349  3.8 

Asia/Pacific

  25,159  4.3  16,395  3.4  19,744  3.9 
              

Total

 $576,681  100.0%$480,781  100.0%$501,456  100.0%
              
              

U.S. 

 $167,314  29.0%$164,347  34.2%$204,629  40.8%

Non-U.S. 

  409,367  71.0  316,434  65.8  296,827  59.2 
              

Total

 $576,681  100.0%$480,781  100.0%$501,456  100.0%
              
              

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 17—Business Segment Information (Continued)

to $45,663,000 representing 10.9% of the total. No other country except for the United States accounted for over 10% of consolidated consulting fee revenue.

Total Revenue by Geographic Region:

 
 2014 2013 2012 

U.S./Canada

 $170,550  26.6%$171,012  29.7%$167,682  34.9%

Latin America

  41,106  6.4  49,546  8.6  52,046  10.8 

Europe

  84,335  13.2  80,062  13.9  90,624  18.8 

Middle East

  280,502  43.8  224,716  39.0  138,731  28.9 

Africa

  27,474  4.3  26,186  4.5  15,303  3.2 

Asia/Pacific

  36,314  5.7  25,159  4.3  16,395  3.4 

Total

 $640,281  100.0%$576,681  100.0%$480,781  100.0%

U.S. 

 $166,893  26.1%$167,314  29.0%$164,347  34.2%

Non-U.S. 

  473,388  73.9  409,367  71.0  316,434  65.8 

Total

 $640,281  100.0%$576,681  100.0%$480,781  100.0%

        For the year ended December 31, 2014, total revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $74,708,000 representing 11.7% of the total and Oman's total revenue amounted to $70,798,000 representing 11.8% of the total. No other country except for the United States accounted for over 10% of consolidated total revenue.

        For the year ended December 31, 2013, total revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $68,158,000 representing 11.8% of the total. ExceptNo other country except for the United States no other country accounted for over 10% of consolidated total revenue.

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, total revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $63,072,000 representing 13.1% of total revenue. ExceptNo other country except for the United States no other country accounted for accounted for over 10% of consolidated total revenue.

        For the year ended December 31, 2011, total revenue for the United Arab Emirates amounted to $67,537,000 representing 13.5% of the total. Except for the United States, no other country accounted for accounted for over 10% of consolidated total revenue.

Consulting Fee Revenue By Client Type:

 
 2013 2012 2011 

U.S. federal government

 $14,958  2.9%$12,877  3.1%$11,667  2.9%

U.S. state, regional and local governments

  69,477  13.6  61,790  14.8  64,734  16.2 

Foreign governments

  181,066  35.3  96,242  23.0  85,756  21.5 

Private sector

  246,584  48.2  246,689  59.1  237,097  59.4 
              

Total

 $512,085  100.0%$417,598  100.0%$399,254  100.0%
              
              

Total Revenue By Client Type:


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

U.S. federal government

 $17,499 3.0%$15,429 3.2%$13,885 2.8% $13,250 2.3%$14,958 2.9%$12,877 3.1%

U.S. state, regional and local governments

 100,157 17.4 82,898 17.2 150,818 30.1  74,921 13.0 69,477 13.6 61,790 14.8 

Foreign governments

 188,981 32.8 102,136 21.2 91,375 18.2  219,605 38.1 181,066 35.3 96,242 23.0 

Private sector

 270,044 46.8 280,318 58.4 245,378 48.9  268,029 46.6 246,584 48.2 246,689 59.1 
             

Total

 $576,681 100.0%$480,781 100.0%$501,456 100.0% $575,805 100.0%$512,085 100.0%$417,598 100.0%
             
             

Table of Contents


HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 17—Business Segment Information (Continued)

Total Revenue By Client Type:

 
 2014 2013 2012 

U.S. federal government

 $16,459  2.6%$17,499  3.0%$15,429  3.2%

U.S. state, regional and local governments

  104,866  16.4  100,157  17.4  82,898  17.2 

Foreign governments

  232,715  36.3  188,981  32.8  102,136  21.2 

Private sector

  286,241  44.7  270,044  46.8  280,318  58.4 

Total

 $640,281  100.0%$576,681  100.0%$480,781  100.0%
���

Total Assets by Geographic Region:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

U.S./Canada

 $104,729 $115,621  $113,481 $104,729 

Latin America

 37,506 42,088  33,757 37,506 

Europe

 102,871 110,013  98,106 102,871 

Middle East

 108,654 81,185  130,969 108,654 

Africa

 79,043 66,772  68,834 79,043 

Asia/Pacific

 16,299 5,994  19,837 16,299 
     

Total

 $449,102 $421,673  $464,984 $449,102 

U.S.

 $111,588 $103,017 

Non-U.S.

 353,396 346,085 
      $464,984 $449,102 
     

U.S.

 $103,017 $114,035 

Non-U.S.

 346,085 307,638 
     

 $449,102 $421,673 
     
     

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net by Geographic Location:


 December 31,  December 31, 

 2013 2012  2014 2013 

U.S./Canada

 $3,837 $4,700  $3,358 $3,837 

Latin America

 1,351 1,278  1,101 1,351 

Europe

 2,575 2,334  2,191 2,575 

Middle East

 2,167 2,344  3,428 2,167 

Africa

 182 191  901 182 

Asia/Pacific

 501 421  664 501 
     

Total

 $10,613 $11,268  $11,643 $10,613 
     
     

U.S.

 $3,837 $4,697  $3,358 $3,837 

Non-U.S.

 6,776 6,571  8,285 6,776 
     

Total

 $10,613 $11,268  $11,643 $10,613 
     
     

Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.2014. The financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20132014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in the 19922013Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"), and our report dated March 14, 201413, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

        As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has significant accounts receivable from its operations in Libya. Since the end of the civil unrest in this country, the Company continues its collection efforts and is attempting to reestablish itits operations. Due to these circumstances, if the Company is unable to collect these outstanding accounts receivable, the Company's financial condition could be significantly impacted.

        In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to above, we also audited Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.2014. In our opinion, this financial schedule, when considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information stated therein.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP


Iselin, New Jersey
March 14, 201413, 2015


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

        We have audited Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries' (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in the 19922013Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion, Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in the 19922013Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013,2014, and our report dated March 14, 201413, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

Iselin, New Jersey
March 14, 201413, 2015


Table of Contents


Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

        The following is a summary of certain quarterly financial information for fiscal years 20132014 and 2012:2013:

(in thousands, except per share data)
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Total  First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Total 

Year Ended December 31, 2014

           

Consulting fee revenue

 $137,249 $144,515 $145,324 $148,717 $575,805 

Total revenue

 150,013 159,639 161,491 169,138 640,281 

Gross profit

 58,659 61,269 62,649 64,433 247,010 

Operating profit

 6,000 8,655 11,297 3,328 29,280 

Net earnings (loss)

 293 2,016 (8,615) (3,310) (9,616)

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Hill

 53 1,518 ��(8,966) (3,484) (10,879)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

 $0.00 $0.04 $(0.19)$(0.07)$(0.25)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 $0.00 $0.04 $(0.19)$(0.07)$(0.25)

Year Ended December 31, 2013

            
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Consulting fee revenue

 $122,556 $128,427 $130,181 $130,921 $512,085  $122,556 $128,427 $130,181 $130,921 $512,085 

Total revenue

 136,073 148,464 147,194 144,950 576,681  136,073 148,464 147,194 144,950 576,681 

Gross profit

 49,858 53,070 54,447 58,655 216,030  49,858 53,070 54,447 58,655 216,030 

Operating profit

 7,399 9,840 8,252 6,967 32,458  7,399 9,840 8,252 6,967 32,458 

Net earnings

 38 1,271 2,942 (700) 3,551 

Net earnings (loss)

 38 1,271 2,942 (700) 3,551 

Net (loss) earnings attributable to Hill

 (380) 719 2,556 (1,266) 1,629  (380) 719 2,556 (1,266) 1,629 

Basic (loss) earnings per common share

 $(0.01)$0.02 $0.06 $(0.03)$0.04  $(0.01)$0.02 $0.06 $(0.03)$0.04 

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share

 $(0.01)$0.02 $0.06 $(0.03)$0.04  $(0.01)$0.02 $0.06 $(0.03)$0.04 

Year Ended December 31, 2012

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Consulting fee revenue

 $99,197 $104,069 $103,565 $110,767 $417,598 

Total revenue

 115,813 119,428 119,887 125,653 480,781 

Gross profit

 40,735 44,268 45,106 47,917 178,026 

Operating (loss) profit

 (2,737) 3,197 5,090 (303) 5,247 

Net (loss) earnings

 (6,537) 518 1,442 (21,768) (26,345)

Net (loss) earnings attributable to Hill

 (6,736) (324) 1,304 (22,461) (28,217)

Basic (loss) earnings per common share

 $(0.17)$(0.01)$0.03 $(0.58)$(0.73)

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share

 $(0.17)$(0.01)$0.03 $(0.58)$(0.73)

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

        None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures.

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

        The management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")), as of December 31, 2013.2014. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of that date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the quarter ended December 31, 2013,2014, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

        A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if


Table of Contents

any, within the company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. However, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

(b)

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

        The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance of the reliability of financial reporting and of the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and disposition of assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of its management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on its financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures included in such controls may deteriorate.

        The Company's management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.2014. In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013). These criteria are in the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. The Company's assessment included extensive documenting, evaluating and testing the design and operating effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting.

        Based on the Company's processes and assessment, as described above, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective.

        EisnerAmper LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements in thethis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, has issued an audita report concerning the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that year, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(c)

Changes in Internal Control.

        There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the Company's fourth quarter ended December 31, 2013,2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information.

        Not applicable.


Table of Contents


Part III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

        The information in our 20142015 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year, regarding directors and executive officers appearing under the headings "Proposal 1: Election of Directors" and "Other Matters—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" is incorporated by reference in this section. The information under the heading "Executive Officers" in Part��Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K is also incorporated by reference in this section. In addition, the information under the heading "Corporate Governance" in our 20142015 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference in this section.

        We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. This code of ethics is available on our website atwww.hillintl.com,, or may be obtained free of charge by making a written request addressed to our Legal Department. We will disclose on our website amendments to, and, if any are granted, waivers of, our code of ethics for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation.

        The information appearing in our 20142015 Proxy Statement under the headings "Director Compensation," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Report of the Compensation Committee", and "Executive Compensation" is incorporated by reference in this section.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

        The information appearing in our 20142015 Proxy Statement under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" is incorporated by reference in this section.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 20132014 for common shares of the Company that may be issued under our 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan, our 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and our 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Plan. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further information related to these plans.


 Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
A
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
B
 Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column A)
C
  Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
A
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
B
 Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column A)
C
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 6,574,156 $4.67 2,967,168(1) 7,359,176 $4.67 3,576,852(1)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

        
       

Total

 6,574,156 $4.67 2,967,168  7,359,176 $4.67 3,576,852 
       
       

(1)
Includes 1,366,844As of December 31, 2014, the Company had 2,057,474 shares which remainremaining available for future issuance under our 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1,430,3341,375,863 shares which remainremaining available for future issuance under our 2008

Table of Contents

(2)
In January 2015, the Company granted 1,025,000 options to purchase shares of its common stock, decreasing the number of shares remaining available for future issuance under our 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan to 1,032,074 as of January 27, 2015.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services.


Table of Contents


PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)
Documents filed as part of this report:


Financial statements:


The consolidated balance sheets of the Registrant as of December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013,2014, the footnotes thereto, and the report of EisnerAmper LLP, independent auditors, are filed herewith.




Financial statement schedule:


Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.2012.

Table of Contents

(b)
Exhibits


Exhibit Index

Exhibit No. Description
 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 5, 2005, by and among Arpeggio Acquisition Corporation, Hill International, Inc. and certain stockholders of Hill International, Inc., as amended.(1)

 

3.1

 

3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Arpeggio Acquisition Corporation.(2)

 

3.2

 

3.2Amended and Restated By-laws of Hill International, Inc.(3)

 

3.3

 

3.3Certificate of First Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Hill International, Inc.(4)

 

4.1

 

4.1Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(5)

 

10.1

10.1*
Hill International, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan (as amended through June 11, 2012).(6)

 

10.2

10.2*
Employment Agreement between the Company and Irvin E. Richter.(7)

 

10.3

10.3*
Employment Agreement between the Company and David L. Richter.(8)

 

10.4

10.4*
Employment Agreement between the Company and IrwinIrvin E. Richter, dated as of December 31, 2014.(9)

 

10.5

10.5*
Employment Agreement between the Company and David L. Richter, dated as of December 31, 2014.(10)

 

10.6

 

10.6Contract for Construction Management/Build Services dated February 11, 2004 between Hill International, Inc. and City of New York, Department of Design and Construction.(11)

 

10.7

 

10.7U.S. Credit Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2014, among Hill International, Inc., as borrower, Société Générale, as administrative agent, collateral agent and lender, the other lenders party thereto, and certain subsidiaries of the Company.(12)
10.8U.S. Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2014, among Hill International, Inc., Société Générale, as administrative agent and collateral agent and certain subsidiaries of the Company.(13)
10.9International Credit Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2014, among Hill International N.V., as borrower, Hill International, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries party thereto, and Société Générale, as administrative agent, collateral agent and letter of credit issuer, and the lenders party thereto.(14)
10.10International Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2014, among Hill International N.V., as borrower, Hill International, Inc., and the lenders party thereto in favor of Société Générale, as administrative agent.(15)
10.11Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2014, by and among Société Générale, as collateral agent, and the loan parties thereto.(16)
10.12Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009 among Hill International, Inc., as the borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The Private Bank and Trust Company and PNC Bank N.A.(12)(17)


Table of Contents

Exhibit No. Description
 10.810.13 Forbearance Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, by and among Hill International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank N.A., as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent for the Secured Parties (as defined in the Credit Agreement).(13)(18)

 

10.9

 

10.14First Amendment to Forbearance Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2011, by and among Hill International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank National Association, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (as defined in the Forbearance Agreement).(14)(19)

 

10.10

 

10.15Second Amendment to Forbearance Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2011, by and among Hill International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank National Association, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (as defined in the Forbearance Agreement).(15)(20)

 

10.11

 

10.16Forbearance and First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2011, by and among Hill International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank National Association, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (as defined in the Forbearance Agreement).(16)(21)

 

10.12

 

10.17Limited Waiver and Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated March 6, 2012 between Hill International, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The Private Bank and Trust Company, PNC Bank N.A., as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (as defined in the Credit Agreement).(17)(22)

 

10.13

 

10.18Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, by and among Hill International, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank National Association, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent.(18)(23)

 

10.14

 

10.19Second Amendment to Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, made by Hill International Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent.(19)(24)

 

10.15

 

10.20Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2013, by and among Hill International, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Capital One, N.A., The PrivateBank and Trust Company, PNC Bank National Association, as Lenders, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent.(20)(25)

 

10.16

 

10.21Credit Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, by and among Hill International, Inc., as Borrower, each lender from time to time party thereto, as Lenders, and Obsidian Agency Services, Inc., as administrative agent.(21)(26)

 

10.17

 

10.22Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, made by Hill International, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries party thereto in favor of Obsidian Agency Services, Inc. as administrative agent.(22)(27)

 

10.18

 

10.23Note, dated as of October 18, 2012, issued by Hill International, Inc. in favor of Tennenbaum Opportunities Fund VI, LLC for $28,000,000.(23)(28)

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.Description
 10.19
10.24 Note, dated as of October 18, 2012, issued by Hill International, Inc. in favor of Tennenbaum Opportunities Partners V, LLC for $46,666,667.(24)(29)

 

10.20

 

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.Description
10.25Note, dated as of October 18, 2012, issued by Hill International, Inc. in favor of Special Value Expansion Fund, LLC for $8,000,000.(25)(30)

 

10.21

 

10.26Note, dated as of October 18, 2012, issued by Hill International, Inc. in favor of Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC for $17,333,333.(26)(31)

 

10.22

 

10.27Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, made by Hill International, Inc. in favor of Obsidian Agency Services, Inc.(27)(32)

 

10.23

 

10.28Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, by and between Bank of America, N.A. and Obsidian Agency Services, Inc.(28)(33)

 

10.24

 

10.29Letter, dated as of October 18, 2012, from Hill International, Inc. to Obsidian Agency Services, Inc., as Administrative Agent regarding Fee Letter.(29)(34)

 

10.25

 

10.30First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2013, by and among Hill International, Inc., as Borrower, Special Opportunities Fund, LLC, Special Value Expansion Fund, LLC, Tennenbaum Opportunities Partners V, LP and Tennenbaum Opportunities Fund VI, LLC, as Lenders, and Obsidian Agency Services, Inc., as administrative agent.(30)(35)

 

10.26

10.31*
Hill International, Inc. 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Grant Plan, as amended.(31)(36)

 

10.27

10.32*
Hill International, Inc. 2007 Restricted Stock Grant Plan.(32)(37)

 

10.28

10.33*
Hill International, Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.(33)(38)

 

14

 

14Code of Ethics.(34)(39)

 

21

 

21Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

 

23.1

 

23.1Consent of EisnerAmper LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

31.1

 

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.2

 

31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.1

 

32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.2

 

32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

101.INS

 

101.INSXBRL Instance Document.

 

101.SCH

 

101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

 

101.PRE

 

101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

101.CAL

 

101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

 

101.LAB

 

101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.Description
 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

(1) Included as Annex A of the Definitive Proxy Statement (No. 000-50781) filed on June 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

 

(2)Included as Annex B of the Definitive Proxy Statement (No. 000-50781) filed on June 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents


(3)

 

(3)Included as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4)

 

(4)Included as Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed on March ,18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5)

 

(5)Included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-114816) filed on April 23, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.

(6)

 

(6)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(7)

 

(7)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(8)

 

(8)Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(9)

 

(9)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(10)

 

(10)Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(11)

 

(11)Included as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(12)

 

(12)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(13)Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(14)Included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(15)Included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(16)Included as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
(17)Included as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

(13)

 

(18)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(14)

 

(19)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(15)

 

(20)Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(16)

 

(21)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(17)

 

(22)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(18)

 

Table of Contents

(23)Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(19)

 

(24)Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents

(20)
(25) Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(21)

 

(26)Included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(22)

 

(27)Included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(23)

 

(28)Included as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(24)

 

(29)Included as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(25)

 

(30)Included as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(26)

 

(31)Included as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(27)

 

(32)Included as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(28)

 

(33)Included as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(29)

 

(34)Included as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(30)

 

(35)Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(31)*

 

(36)*Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(32)*

 

(37)*Included as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-141814), filed on April 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(33)*

 

(38)*Included as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-152145), filed on July 3, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

(34)

 

(39)Included as Exhibit 14 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 filed on August 11, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.

*

 

*Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan.

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  Hill International, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ IRVIN E.DAVID L. RICHTER

Irvin E.David L. Richter
ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Date: March 14, 201413, 2015

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dated indicated.

By: /s/ IRVIN E. RICHTER

Irvin E. Richter
Chairman Chief Executive Officer and Director
 By: /s/ GARY F. MAZZUCCO

Gary F. Mazzucco
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 13, 2015 Date: March 14, 2014
Date: March 14, 201413, 2015

By:

 

/s/ DAVID L. RICHTER

David L. Richter
President, Chief OperatingExecutive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

 

By:

 

/s/ BRIAN W. CLYMER

Brian W. Clymer
Director
Date: March 14, 201413, 2015 Date: March 14, 201413, 2015

By:

 

/s/ JOHN FANELLI III

John Fanelli III
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

 

By:

 

/s/ ALAN S. FELLHEIMER

Alan S. Fellheimer
Director
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date: March 13, 2015 Date: March 14, 2014
Date: March 14, 201413, 2015

By:

 

/s/ CAMILLE S. ANDREWS

Camille S. Andrews
Director

 

By:

 

/s/ STEVEN M. KRAMER

Steven M. Kramer
Director
Date: March 14, 201413, 2015 Date: March 14, 201413, 2015

By:

 

/s/ RONALD F. EMMA

Ronald F. Emma
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 
Date: March 14, 201413, 2015    

Table of Contents


Schedule II

Hill International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(Allowance for Uncollectible Receivables)


 Balance at
Beginning of
Fiscal Year
 Additions
Charged to
Earnings
 Other—
Allowance
Acquired in
Business
Combinations
 Uncollectible
Receivables
Written off,
Net of
Recoveries
 Balance at
End of
Fiscal Year
  Balance at
Beginning of
Fiscal Year
 Additions
Charged to
Earnings
 Other—
Allowance
Acquired in
Business
Combinations
 Uncollectible
Receivables
Written off,
Net of
Recoveries
 Balance at
End of
Fiscal Year
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

 $10,268 $3,928 $90 $(4,756)$9,530 
           

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

 $9,530 $5,323 $161 $(3,872)$11,142 
           

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

 $9,181 $3,209 $ $(2,122)$10,268 
           

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

 $10,268 $3,928 $90 $(4,756)$9,530 
           

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

 $9,457 $3,178 $75 $(3,529)$9,181 
           

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

 $9,181 $3,209 $ $(2,122)$10,268