Use these links to rapidly review the document

Table of Contentscontents
Table of Contents
PART IV

Table of Contents




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)  

ýx


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 20152017

Or

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number 1-4423



HP INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
94-1081436
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
94-1081436
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)

1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California


94304
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
94304
(Zip code)

Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code:(650) 857-1501

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ýx No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ýx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ýx No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ýx No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "smaller reporting company"“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerýx
 
Accelerated filero
 
Non-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ýx

The aggregate market value of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was $59,551,395,919$31,655,134,100 based on the last sale price of common stock on April 30, 2015.

2017.

The number of shares of HP Inc. common stock outstanding as of November 30, 20152017 was 1,791,848,3661,645,228,387 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION10-K PART
Portions of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s proxy statement related to its 20152017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after Registrant'sRegistrant’s fiscal year end of October 31, 20152017 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. III



Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2015
2017


Table of Contents



Page

PART I

   

Item 1.

 

Business

Page
 
PART I 
Item 1.
Item 1A.

Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 

Risk Factors

18PART II 

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

37

Item 2.

Properties

38

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

39

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

39

PART II


Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A.
Item 9B.
 182PART III 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

182

Item 9B.

Other Information

182

PART III


Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 184PART IV 

PART IV


Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 16.

In this report on Form 10-K, for all periods presented, "we"“we”, "us"“us”, "our"“our”, "company"“company”, "HP"“HP” and "HP“HP Inc." refer to HP Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company).


and its consolidated subsidiaries.



Table of Contents


Forward-Looking Statements

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including "Management's“Business” in Item 1 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” in Item 7, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks or uncertainties ever materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, the results of HP Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries ("HP"(“HP”) may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to any projections of net revenue, margins, expenses, effective tax rates, net earnings, net earnings per share, cash flows, benefit plan funding, deferred tax assets,taxes, share repurchases, foreign currency exchange rates or other financial items; any projections of the amount, timing or impact of cost savings or restructuring and other charges; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including, but not limited to, our sustainability goals, the execution of restructuring plans and any resulting cost savings, net revenue or profitability improvements; any statements concerning the expected development, performance, market share or competitive performance relating to products or services; any statements regarding current or future macroeconomic trends or events and the impact of those trends and events on HP and its financial performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief;belief, including with respect to the timing and expected benefits of acquisitions and other business combination and investment transactions; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Risks, uncertainties and assumptions include the need to address the many challenges facing HP'sHP’s businesses; the competitive pressures faced by HP'sHP’s businesses; risks associated with executing HP's strategy, including the planned separation transaction;HP’s strategy; the impact of macroeconomic and geopolitical trends and events; the need to manage third-party suppliers and the distribution of HP'sHP’s products and the delivery of HP'sHP’s services effectively; the protection of HP'sHP’s intellectual property assets, including intellectual property licensed from third parties; risks associated with HP'sHP’s international operations; the development and transition of new products and services and the enhancement of existing products and services to meet customer needs and respond to emerging technological trends; the execution and performance of contracts by HP and its suppliers, customers, clients and partners; the hiring and retention of key employees; integration and other risks associated with business combination and investment transactions; the results of the restructuring plans, including estimates and assumptions related to the cost (including any possible disruption of HP’s business) and the anticipated benefits of the restructuring plans; the resolution of pending investigations, claims and disputes; and other risks that are described herein, including but not limited to the items discussed in "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of this report and that are otherwise described or updated from time to time in HP'sHP’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports.(“the SEC”). HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.




PART I

ITEM 1. Business.

Business Overview

We are a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, software, solutions and servicesservices. We sell to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses ("SMBs"(“SMBs”) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors.

HP was incorporated in 1947 under the laws of the state of California as the successor to a partnership founded in 1939 by William R. Hewlett and David Packard. Effective in May 1998, we changed our state of incorporation from California to Delaware.

HP Inc. Separation Transaction

On November 1, 2015, (the "Distribution Date"), Hewlett-Packard Companywe completed the separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company ("(“Hewlett Packard Enterprise"Enterprise”), Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany’s former enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses (the "Separation"“Separation”). In connection with the Separation, Hewlett-Packard Company changed its name to HP Inc. Accordingly, references to the "company" in this report refer to Hewlett-Packard Company with respect to events occurring on or prior to October 31, 2015,(“HP”).
At Separation, we and to HP Inc. with respect to events occurring after October 31, 2015.

        On November 1, 2015, each of our stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 21, 2015 (the "Record Date") received one share of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stockentered into a separation and distribution agreement as well as various other agreements that provide a framework for every one share of our common stock held as of the Record Date.

        Hewlett Packard Enterprise is nowrelationships between the parties going forward, including, among others, a tax matters agreement, an independent public company trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "HPE". After the Separation, we do not beneficially own any shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stockemployee matters agreement, a transition service agreement, a real estate matters agreement, a master commercial agreement and beginning November 1, 2015, we no longer consolidate Hewlett Packard Enterprise within our financial results or reflect the financial results of Hewlett Packard Enterprise within our continuing results of operations.

        The historical results of operations and the financial position of Hewlett Packard Enterprise are included in the consolidated financial statements of HP Inc. for each of the fiscal years included in this report and will be reported as discontinued operations beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

an information technology service agreement.

HP Products and Services; Segment Information

        Our offerings span the following:

We offer one of the IT industry's broadest portfolios of products and services that bring together infrastructure, software, and services through innovation to enable our customers to create value and solve business problems. As consumers and enterprises shift the way technology is created, delivered,


Table of Contents

consumed and paidhave three segments for they are demanding a foundation that will support much greater agility, lower cost, facilitate quicker time-to-market, and provide a higher degree of accessibility by end-users to that technology. We design our solutions to provide that foundation, particularly in the areas of security, cloud, mobility and big data, by leveraging the breadth of our offerings and the strengths and capabilities of our individual business units.

        Our operations are organized into seven business segments: Personal Systems; Printing; the Enterprise Group ("EG"); Enterprise Services ("ES"); Software; HP Financial Services ("HPFS"); and Corporate Investments. As a result of the Separation, effective November 1, 2015 EG, ES, Software, HPFS and certain parts of Corporate Investments are no longer reported in the continuing results of HP Inc.financial reporting purposes: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments. The Personal Systems segment offers Commercial and Consumer personal computers (“PCs”), Workstations, thin clients, Commercial tablets and mobility devices, retail point-of-sale (“POS”) systems, displays and other related accessories, software, support and services for the remaining parts ofcommercial and consumer markets. The Printing segment provides Consumer and Commercial printer hardware, Supplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Corporate Investments segments will beincludes HP Inc.'s reportable segments.

Labs and certain business incubation projects.

In each of the past three fiscal years, notebook personal computers ("PCs"),PCs, printing supplies infrastructure technology outsourcing services,and desktop PCs and industry standard servers ("ISS") each accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net revenue.

        The Personal Systems segment and the Printing segment are structured beneath a broader Printing and Personal Systems Group ("PPS"). While PPS is not a reportable segment, we may provide financial data aggregating the Personal Systems and Printing segments to provide a supplementary view of its business.

A summary of our net revenue, earnings from operations and assets for our segments along with a description of our fiscal 2015 organizational realignments can be found in Note 2, “Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. A discussion of factors potentially affecting our operations is set forth in "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Printing and

Personal Systems Group

        The mission of PPS is to leverage the respective strengths of the Personal Systems segment and the Printing segment by creating a unified business that is customer-focused and poised to capitalize on rapidly shifting industry trends. Each of the business segments within PPS is described in detail below.

Personal Systems provides commercialCommercial and Consumer PCs, consumer PCs, workstations,Workstations, thin client PCs,clients, Commercial tablets and mobility devices, retail point-of-sale ("POS")POS systems, calculatorsdisplays and other related accessories, software, support and services for the commercial and consumer markets. We group commercialCommercial notebooks, commercialCommercial desktops, commercialCommercial services, Commercial tablets workstationsand mobility devices, Commercial detachables, Workstations, retail POS systems and thin clients into commercial clients and consumerConsumer notebooks, Consumer desktops, Consumer services and consumer desktopsConsumer detachables into consumer clients when describing performance in these markets. Both commercialCommercial and consumerConsumer PCs and Commercial tablets and mobility devices are based predominately on Microsoft Windows operating systems and use processors from Intel Corporation ("Intel"(“Intel”) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ("AMD"(“AMD”). Personal Systems also maintains a multi-operating system, multi-architecture strategy using the Google Chrome and Android operating systems among others for notebooks and tablets, respectively.

tablets.

        Commercial PCs.Commercial PCs are optimized for use by customers including enterprise and SMB customers, and forwith a focus on robust designs, security, serviceability, connectivity, reliability and manageability in networked environments. Commercial PCs include the HP ProBook and HP EliteBook lines of notebooks, convertibles, and hybrids (detachable tablets),detachables, the HP Pro and HP Elite lines of business desktops and all-in-ones, retail POS systems, HP Thin Clients, HP ElitePadPro Tablet PCs and HP Pro Tablet PCs.Chromebook. Commercial PCs also include workstations that are designed and optimized for high-performance and demanding application environments including Z desktop workstations, Z all-in-ones and Z mobile workstations. Additionally, we offer a range of services and solutions to enterprise and SMB customers to help them manage the lifecycle of their PC and mobility installed base.


Table of Contentscontents



Consumer PCs.PCs Consumer PCsare notebooks, desktops and hybrids that are optimized for consumer usage, focusing on multi-media consumption, online browsing and light productivity and include the HP Spectre, HP ENVY,Envy, HP Pavilion, HP Chromebook, Omen by HP, Split and HP Slate series of multi-media consumer notebooks, hybrids and desktops, including the TouchSmart line of touch-enabled notebooks and all-in-one desktops.

Personal Systems groups its global business capabilities into Notebooks, Desktops, Workstations and Other when reporting business performance.
Printing

Printing provides consumerConsumer and commercialCommercial printer hardware, supplies, media, softwareSupplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Printing is also focused on imaging solutions in the commercial markets. These solutions range from managed print services to areas such as industrial applications, outdoor signage and the graphic arts business. HP groups LaserJet, large formatOur global business capabilities within Printing are described below:
Office Printing Solutions delivers HP’s office printers, and commercial inkjet printers into Commercial Hardware and consumer and SMB inkjet printers into Consumer Hardware when describing performance in these markets.

        LaserJet and Enterprise Solutions.    LaserJet and Enterprise Solutions delivers LaserJet and enterprise products,Supplies, services, and solutions to the SMBSMBs and enterprise segments including LaserJet printerslarge enterprises. HP goes to market through its extensive channel network and supplies (toner), Officejet Pro X inkjet enterprisedirectly with HP sales. Ongoing key initiatives include design and deployment of A3 products and supplies, multi-function devices, scanners, web-connected hardware, managed services,solutions for the copier and enterprise softwaremultifunction printer market, printer security solutions, such as Web Jetadmin. Managed Print Services providesPageWide solutions and award-winning JetIntelligence LaserJet products.

Home Printing Solutions delivers innovative printing equipment, supplies, support, workflow optimizationproducts and security featuressolutions for SMBthe home and enterprisehome business or small office customers around the world, utilizing proprietary HP toolsboth HP’s Ink and fleet management solutions, as well as third-party software.

        Inkjet and Printing Solutions.    Inkjet and Printing Solutions deliver consumer and SMB inkjet solutions (hardware, ink supplies, media, and web-connected hardware and services) and include single-function and all-in-one inkjet printers. Ongoing initiatives and programs, such as Ink in the Office and Ink Advantage, and newer initiatives,Laser technologies. Initiatives such as Instant Ink are intendedand Continuous Ink Supply System provide business model innovation to provide innovative printing solutions to consumersbenefit and SMBs. Our Ink in the Office initiative is focused on providing high value inkjet printing solutions to SMBs through our Officejet Premium and Officejet Pro inkjet portfolios. Our Ink Advantage program aims to provide savings on the overall cost of printing in emerging markets. Instant Ink is an ink replacement service that allows customers to payexpand HP’s existing customer base, while new innovations like Sprocket drive print relevance for a monthly fee to print a specified number of pages per month.mobile generation.

        Graphics Solutions.Graphics Solutions deliver large format printers (Designjet, Large Format Productionoffers large-format, commercial and Scitex Industrial), specialty printing, digital pressindustrial solutions (Indigo and Inkjet Webpress), supplies and services to print service providers and design and rendering customers. The solutions cover a wide range of printing applications such as technical design, photos, sign and display, direct mail, marketing collateral, labels and packaging and publishing.

        Software and Web Services.    Software and Web Services delivers a suite of offerings, including document storage, entertainment services, web-connected printing, and PC back-up and related services.

        Marketing Optimization.    Marketing Optimization focuses on delivering solutions and software that help businesses engage audiences, reach new customer segments and markets and deliver compelling content across channels. The group provides solutions for augmented reality, contact center analytics, customer communications management and digital experience management.

Enterprise Group

        EG provides a broadconverters through the largest portfolio of enterprise technology solutions to address customer needs in building the foundation for the next generation of applications, web servicesprinters and user experiences—which are only as rich, impactfulpresses (HP DesignJet, HP Latex, HP Scitex, HP Indigo and world-changing as the infrastructure platforms that they sit on. EG technology addresses a wide range of customer challenges, including supporting new types of applications, new approaches to IT operations, and new demands and uses for insight, and managing new threats and risks. EG technology also allows customers to capitalize on a wide range of trends and

HP PageWide Web Presses).

Table of Contents3D Printing

opportunities, from servicing new segments and buying behaviors to inventing new consumption models and creating new revenue streams. EG technology delivers customer outcomes through its innovative, industry leading portfolio across servers, storage, networking, management software, converged infrastructure solutions, and technology services. In today's rapidly changing technology landscape, customers face twin challenges when it comes to their infrastructure foundation: they must optimize their "traditional IT" to support existing applications, and they must simultaneously invest in "cloud-first, mobile-first" infrastructure that will support the next generation of applications, web services and user experiences. The EG portfolio delivers products and services across servers, storage and networking to reduce cost and continue high performance operations for traditional IT loads. For tomorrow's cloud-first, mobile first workloads, the EG portfolio provides products and services across converged solutions engineered for the world's most important workloads in cloud, mobility, infrastructure-as-a-service, and big data; HP OneView as the industry's only unified display software-defined infrastructure management solution; HP Helion cloud portfolio delivering a broad offering of hybrid cloud solutions, cloud services and cloud software; and technology services to advise customers on the right path to transforming their enterprises for tomorrow's digital era.

        Industry Standard Servers.    ISS offers a range of products from entry-level servers through premium ProLiant servers, which run primarily Windows, Linux and virtualization platforms from software providers such as Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and VMware, Inc. ("VMware"), and open source software from other major vendors while leveraging x86 processors from Intel and AMD. The business spans a range of server product lines, including microservers, towers, traditional rack, density-optimized rack and blades, solutions for large, distributed computing companies who buy and deploy nodes at a massive scale. ISS also offers HP Moonshot servers operating on ARM, AMD and Intel Atom-based processors which offer reduced cost, space, energy and complexity compared to traditional servers.

        Business Critical Systems.    Business Critical Systems delivers our mission-critical systems through a portfolio of HP Integrity servers based on the Intel Itanium processor that run the HP-UX and OpenVMS operating systems, as well as HP Integrity NonStop solutions and mission-critical x86 ProLiant servers.

        Storage.    Our storage offerings include platforms for enterprise and SMB environments. Our flagship product is the 3PAR StoreServ Storage Platform, which isHP’s Multi-Jet Fusion 3D Printing Solution designed for virtualization, cloudprototyping and IT-as-a-service. Traditional Storage solutions include tape, storage networkingproduction of functional parts and legacy external disk products such as EVAfunctions on an open platform facilitating the development of new 3D printing materials.

Printing groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
Commercial Hardware consists of Office Printing Solutions, Graphics Solutions and XP. Converged Storage solutions include 3PAR StoreServ, StoreOnce3D Printing, excluding supplies;
Consumer Hardware includes Home Printing Solutions, excluding supplies; and StoreVirtual products. These offerings enable customers to optimize their existing storage systems, build new virtualization solutions and facilitate their transition to cloud computing.

        Networking.Supplies Our networking offerings include switches, routers, wireless local area network ("WLAN") and network management products that deliver open, scalable, secure, agile and consistent solutions that span the data center, campus and branch environments and deliver software-defined networking and unified communications capabilities. Our unified wired and wireless networking offerings include WLAN access points, controllers and switches. Our networking solutions are based on our FlexNetwork architecture, which is designed to enable simplified server virtualization, unified communications and business application delivery for the enterprise. Software-defined networking provides an end-to-end solution to automate the network from data center to campus and branch.

        Technology Services.    Technology Services provides Support and Consulting services. Support services offerings span various levels of customer support needs and include: HP Foundation Care, our portfolio of reactive hardware and software support services; HP Proactive Care, which combines remote support technology for real time monitoring with rapid access to our technical experts; HP Datacenter Care, comprehensive, flexible end-to-end support that enables customers to build, operate or consume IT in private or hybrid cloud environments; and Lifecycle Event services, which are event


Table of Contents

based services, offering our technology expertise and advice for each phase of the technology life cycle. These services are available in the form of service contracts, pre-packaged offerings (HP Care Pack services) or on a customized basis. Consulting services are focused on cloud, mobility and big data and provide IT organizations with advice, design, implementation, migration and optimization of EG's platforms: servers, storage, networking and converged infrastructure.

Enterprise Services

        ES provides technology consulting, outsourcing and support services across infrastructure, applications and business process domains in traditional and Strategic Enterprise Services offerings which includes analytics and data management, security and cloud services. ES leverages our investments in our consulting and support professionals, infrastructure technology, applications, standardized methodologies and global supply and delivery capabilities. ES also creates opportunities for us to market additional hardware and software by offering solutions that leverage our other products and services in order to meet our clients' needs.

        Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing.    The Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing group delivers comprehensive services that streamline and help optimize our clients' technology infrastructure to efficiently enhance performance, reduce costs, mitigate risk and enable business optimization. These services encompass the management of data centers, IT security, cloud computing, workplace technology, networks, unified communications and enterprise service management. We also offercomprises a set of managed services that provide a cross-section of our broader infrastructure serviceshighly innovative advanced consumable products, ranging from Ink and Laser print cartridges; and media to graphics supplies and 3D printing supplies, for smaller, discrete engagements.

        Applicationrecurring use in Consumer and Business Services.Commercial Hardware.    The Application and Business Services portfolio helps our clients develop, revitalize and manage their applications and information assets. Our complete application lifecycle approach encompasses application development, testing, modernization, system integration, maintenance and management for both packaged and custom-built applications and cloud offerings. Our Application and Business Services portfolio also includes intellectual property-based industry solutions, along with technologies and related services, all of which help our clients better manage their critical industry processes for customer relationship management, finance and administration, human resources, payroll and document processing.

Software

        Software portfolio provides big data analytics and applications, enterprise security, application testing and delivery management and IT Operations Management solutions for businesses and other enterprises of all sizes. Our Software offerings include licenses, support, professional services and software-as-a-service ("SaaS"). Our global business capabilities within Software are described below.

        Big Data.    Big Data group provides a full suite of software designed to help organizations capture, store, explore, analyze, protect and share information and insights within and outside their organizations to improve business outcomes, while also enabling them to manage risks and meet legal obligations. Our Big Data suite includes HP Vertica, the leading analytics database technology for machine, structured and semi-structured data; HP IDOL, a unique analytics tool for human information; as well as solutions for archiving, data protection, eDiscovery, information governance and enterprise content management.

        Our big data platform, Haven, brings these unique assets together for processing and understanding machine and sensor data, business data and unstructured human information. A growing ecosystem of customers, partners and developers use this platform to build big data driven analytic applications. Our Software segment also leverages Haven's unique analytic assets to deliver purpose-built solutions for a variety of markets, including application testing and delivery, big data analytics and applications, IT Operations Management, and enterprise security. These solutions are designed for businesses and enterprises of all sizes, and are available via on-premise, as well as via SaaS and hybrid delivery models. Software's Haven big data platform and purpose-built applications are augmented by our support and professional services offerings in order to provide an end-to-end solution to customers.


Table of Contents

        Application Delivery Management.    The Application Delivery Management group provides software that enables organizations to deliver high-performance applications, accelerating the application delivery lifecycle and automating the testing processes to ensure the quality and scalability of desktop, web, mobile and cloud-based applications.

        Enterprise Security.    Enterprise Security software is designed to disrupt fraud, hackers and cyber criminals by testing and scanning software and websites for security vulnerabilities, improving network defenses and security, implementing security controls, safeguarding data at rest, in motion and in use (regardless of where software and data reside), and providing security intelligence, analytics, and information management to identify threats and manage risk.

        IT Operations Management.    The IT Operations Management group provides the software required to automate routine IT tasks and to pinpoint IT problems as they occur, helping enterprises to reduce operational costs and improve the reliability of applications running in a traditional, cloud or hybrid environment.

HP Financial Services

        HPFS provides flexible investment solutions for our customers, such as leasing, financing, IT consumption and utility programs and asset management services that facilitate unique technology deployment models and the acquisition of complete IT solutions, including hardware, software and services from HP and others. In order to provide flexible services and capabilities that support the entire IT lifecycle, HPFS partners with our customers globally to help build investment strategies that enhance their business agility and support their business transformation. HPFS offers a wide selection of investment solution capabilities for large enterprise customers and channel partners, along with an array of financial options to SMBs and educational and governmental entities.

Corporate Investments

Corporate Investments includes HP Labs and certain enterprise-related business incubation projects and venture focused minority investments, among others.

projects.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

We manage our business and report our financial results based on the business segments described above. Our customers are organized by consumer and commercial groups, and purchases of HP products, solutions and services may be fulfilled directly by HP or indirectly through a variety of partners, including:

retailers that sell our products to the public through their own physical or Internet stores;

resellers that sell our products and services, frequently with their own value-added products or services, to targeted customer groups;

distribution partners that supply our solutions to resellers;

original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") that integrate our products and services with their own products
system integrators and services, and sell the integrated solution;

independent software vendors that provide their clients with specialized software products and often assist us in selling our products and services to clients purchasing their products;

systems integrators that provide expertise in designing and implementing custom IT solutions and often partner with us to extend their expertise or influence the sale of our products and services; and

Table of Contents

    other advisory firms that provide various levels of management and IT consulting, including some systems integration work, and typically partner with us on client solutions that require our unique products and services.

The mix of our business conducted by direct sales or channel sales differs substantially by business and region. We believe that customer buying patterns and different regional market conditions require us to tailor our sales, marketing and distribution efforts accordingly. We are focused on driving the depth and breadth of our coverage, in addition to identifying efficiencies and productivity gains, in both our direct and indirect businesses. While each of our key business segments manages the execution of its own go-to-market and distribution strategy, our business segments also collaborate to ensureaccomplish strategic and process alignment where appropriate. For example, we typically assign an account manager to manage relationships across our business with large enterprise customers. The account manager is supported by a team of specialists with product and services expertise. For other customers and for consumers, PPSwe typically managesmanage direct online sales as well as


channel relationships with retailers, while our business segments collaborate to manage relationships with commercial resellers targeting SMBs where appropriate.

Manufacturing and Materials

We utilize a significant number of outsourced manufacturers ("OMs"(“OMs”) around the world to manufacture HP-designed products. The use of OMs is intended to generate cost efficiencies and reduce time to market for HP-designed products. We use multiple OMs to maintain flexibility in our supply chain and manufacturing processes. In some circumstances, third-party OEMssuppliers produce products that we purchase and resell under the HP brand. In addition to our use of OMs, we currently manufacture a limited number of finished products from components and subassemblies that we acquire from a wide range of vendors.

We utilize two primary methods of fulfilling demand for products: building products to order and configuring products to order. We build products to order to maximize manufacturing and logistics efficiencies by producing high volumes of basic product configurations. Alternatively, configuring products to order enables units to match a customer'scustomer’s particular hardware and software customization requirements. Our inventory management and distribution practices in both building products to order and configuring products to order seek to minimize inventory holding periods by taking delivery of the inventory and manufacturing shortly before the sale or distribution of products to our customers.

We purchase materials, supplies and product subassemblies from a substantial number of vendors. For most of our products, we have existing alternate sources of supply or such alternate sources of supply are readily available. However, we do relyhave relied on sole sources for laser printer engines, LaserJet supplies, certain customized parts and parts for products with short life cycles (although some of these sources have operations in multiple locations, inmitigating the eventeffect of a disruption). For instance, we source majority of our A4 and a portion of A3 portfolio laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges from Canon. Any decision by either party not to renew our agreement with Canon or to limit or reduce the scope of the agreement could adversely affect our net revenue from LaserJet products; however, we have a long-standing business relationship with Canon and anticipate renewal of this agreement.
We are dependent upon Intel and AMD as suppliers of x86 processors and Microsoft for various software products; however, weproducts. We believe that disruptions with these suppliers would result inhave industry-wide dislocationsramifications, and therefore would not disproportionately disadvantage us relative to our competitors. See "Risk“Risk Factors—We depend on third-party suppliers, and our financial results could suffer if we fail to manage our suppliers effectively," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Like other participants in the ITinformation technology (“IT”) industry, we ordinarily acquire materials and components through a combination of blanket and scheduled purchase orders to support our demand requirements for periods averaging 90 to 120 days. From time to time, we may experience significant price volatility or supply constraints for certain components that are not available from multiple sources. Frequently, we are able to obtain scarce components for somewhat higher prices on the open market, which may have an impact on our gross margin but does not generally disrupt production. We also may acquire component inventory in anticipation of supply constraints or enter into longer-term pricing


Table of Contents

commitments with vendors to improve the priority, price and availability of supplies. See "Risk“Risk Factors—We depend on third-party suppliers, and our financial results could suffer if we fail to manage our suppliers effectively," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Sustainability also plays an important role in the manufacturing and sourcing of materials and components for our products. We strive to make our products in an ethical and sustainable manner. We have committed to building an efficient, resilient and sustainable supplier network, and we collaborate with our suppliers to improve their labor practices and working conditions, and to reduce the environmental impact of their operations. These actions, together with our broader sustainability program, help us in our effort to meet customer sustainability requirements and comply with regulations, for example, regarding supplier labor practices and conflict minerals disclosures. For more information on our sustainability goals, programs, and performance, we refer you to our annual sustainability report, available on our website (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
International

Our products and services are available worldwide. We believe this geographic diversity allows us to meet both consumer and enterprise customers’ demand on a worldwide basis for both consumer and enterprise customers, draws on business and technical expertise from a worldwide workforce,workforce. This provides stability to our operations, provides revenue streams that may offset geographic economic trends and offers us an opportunity to access new markets for maturing products. In addition, we believe that future growth is dependent in part on our ability to develop products and sales models that target developing countries. In this regard, we believe that our broad geographic presence as well as our focus in diversity and inclusion, gives us a solid base on which to build such future growth.



A summary of our domestic and international net revenue and net property, plant and equipment is set forth in Note 2, “Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. Approximately 64%63% of our overall net revenue in fiscal 2015year 2017 came from outside the United States ("U.S.").

States.

For a discussion of risks attendant to HP'sHP’s international operations, see "Risk“Risk Factors—Due to the international nature of our business, political or economic changes or other factors could harm our business and financial performance," in Item 1A, "Quantitative“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk," in Item 7A and Note 11, “Borrowings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Research and Development

Innovation across products, services, business models and processes is a key element of our culture. Our development efforts are focused on designing and developing products, services and solutions that anticipate customers'customers’ changing needs and desires, and emerging technological trends. Our efforts also are focused on identifying the areas where we believe we can make a unique contribution and the areas where partnering with other leading technology companies will leverage our cost structure and maximize our customers'customers’ experiences.

HP Labs, together with the various research and development groups within our business segments, areis responsible for our research and development efforts. HP Labs is part of our Corporate Investments segment.

Expenditures for research and development were $3.5$1.2 billion in each of fiscal 2015, $3.4 billion in fiscal 2014years 2017, 2016 and $3.1 billion in fiscal 2013.2015. We anticipate that we will continue to have significant research and development expenditures in the future to support the design and development of innovative, high-quality products and services to maintain and enhance our competitive position.

For a discussion of risks attendant to our research and development activities, see "Risk“Risk Factors—If we cannot successfully execute our go-to-market strategy and continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products and services, our business and financial performance may suffer," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Patents

Our general policy has been to seek patent protection for those inventions likely to be incorporated into our products and services or where obtaining such proprietary rights will improve our competitive position. At October 31, 2015,2017, our worldwide patent portfolio included over 33,000 patents, which represents a slight decrease over the number of patents in our portfolio at the end of fiscal 2014. As a result of the Separation, approximately 15,000 patents were transferred to Hewlett Packard Enterprise beginning November 1, 2015.

18,000 patents.

Table of Contents

Patents generally have a term of twenty years from the date they are filed. As our patent portfolio has been built over time, the remaining terms of the individual patents across our patent portfolio vary. We believe that our patents and patent applications are important for maintaining the competitive differentiation of our products and services, enhancing our freedom of action to sell our products and services in markets in which we choose to participate, and maximizing our return on research and development investments. No single patent is in itself essential to HP as a whole or to any of HP'sHP’s business segments.

In addition to developing our patent portfolio, we license intellectual property ("IP"(“IP”) from third parties as we deem appropriate. We have also granted and continue to grant to others licenses, and other rights, under our patents when we consider these arrangements to be in our interest. These license arrangements include a number of cross-licenses with third parties.

For a discussion of risks attendant to IP rights, see "Risk“Risk Factors—Our financial performance may suffer if we cannot continue to develop, license or enforce the intellectual property rights on which our businesses depend," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Backlog

We believe that backlog is not a meaningful indicator of future business prospects due to our diverse products and services portfolio, including the large volume of products delivered from finished goods or channel partner inventories and the shortening of some product life cycles. Therefore, we believe that backlog information is not material to an understanding of our overall business.

Seasonality

General economic conditions have an impact on our business and financial results. From time to time, the markets in which we sell our products and services experience weak economic conditions that may negatively affect sales. We experience some seasonal trends in the sale of our products and services. For example, European sales are often weaker in the summer months and consumer sales are often stronger in the fourth calendar quarter. Demand during the spring and early summer months also may be adversely impacted by market anticipation of seasonal trends. See "Risk“Risk Factors—Our uneven sales cycle makes planning and inventory management difficult and future financial results less predictable," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.



Competition

We encounter strong competition in all areas of our business activity. We compete primarily on the basis of technology, performance, price, quality, reliability, brand, reputation, distribution, range of products and services, ease of use of our products, account relationships, customer training, service and support, security, availability of application software and internet infrastructure offerings.

offerings, and our sustainability performance.

The markets for each of our key business segments are characterized by strong competition among major corporations with long-established positions and a large number of new and rapidly growing firms. Most product life cycles are short, and to remain competitive we must develop new products and services, periodically enhance our existing products and services and compete effectively on the basis of the factors listed above. In addition, we compete with many of our current and potential partners, including OEMs that design, manufacture and often market their products under their own brand names. Our successful management of these competitive partner relationships will be critical to our future success. Moreover, we anticipate that we will have to continue to adjust prices on many of our products and services to stay competitive.

We have a broad technology portfolio spanning personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing-related products and services, enterprise IT infrastructure products and solutions,


Table of Contents

multi-vendor customer services and IT management software and solutions.services. We are the leader or among the leaders in each of our key business segments.

The competitive environmentsenvironment in which each key segment operates areis described below:

Personal Systems.The markets in which Personal Systems operates are highly competitive and are characterized by price competition. The decline in the PC market and the ongoing shift among customersunit decline has moderated while market revenue has improved due to mobility products has further intensified competition in the PC market.higher average selling prices. Our primary competitors are Lenovo Group Limited, ("Lenovo"), Dell Inc. ("Dell"), Acer Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., Apple Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung"). In particular regions, we also experience competition from local companies and from generically-branded or "white box"“white box” manufacturers. Our competitive advantages include our broad product portfolio, our innovation and research and development capabilities including security features, our design, our brand and procurement leverage, our ability to cross-sell our portfolio of offerings, our extensive service and support offerings and the accessibility of our products through a broad-based distribution strategy from retail and commercial channels to direct sales.


        Printing.Printing. The markets for printer hardware and associated supplies are highly competitive. Printing'sPrinting’s key customer segments each face competitive market pressures in pricing and the introduction of new products. Our primary competitors include Canon U.S.A., Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Xerox Corporation Ltd., Seiko Epson Corporation, The Ricoh Company Ltd., Samsung and Brother Industries, Ltd. In addition, independent suppliers offer refill and remanufactured alternatives for HP original inkjet and toner supplies, which are often available for lower prices but generally offer lower print quality and reliability. Other competitors also have developed and marketed new compatible cartridges for HP'sHP’s laser and inkjet products, particularly outside of the U.S.United States where IP protection is inadequate or ineffective. Our competitive advantages include our comprehensive high quality solutions for the home, office and publishing environments, our innovation and research and development capabilities including security features, our brand, and the accessibility of our products through a broad-based distribution strategy from retail and commercial channels to direct sales.

        Enterprise Group.    EG operates in the highly competitive enterprise technology infrastructure market that is characterized by rapid and ongoing technological innovation and price competition. Our primary competitors include technology vendors such as International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), Dell, EMC Corporation ("EMC"), Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), Lenovo, Oracle Corporation ("Oracle"), Fujitsu Limited ("Fujitsu"), Inspur Co. Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., NetApp, Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Juniper Networks, Inc., Arista Networks, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc., Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., VMware, Microsoft, Google Inc., Rackspace Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc. ("Amazon"). In certain regions, we also experience competition from local companies and from generically-branded or "white-box" manufacturers. Our strategy is to deliver superior products, high-value technology support services and differentiated integrated solutions that combine our infrastructure, software and services capabilities. Our competitive advantages include our broad end-to-end solutions portfolio, supported by our strong IP portfolio and research and development capabilities, coupled with our global reach and partner ecosystem.

        Enterprise Services.    ES competes in the IT services, consulting and integration, infrastructure technology outsourcing, business process outsourcing and application services markets. Our primary competitors include IBM Global Services, Computer Sciences Corporation, systems integration firms such as Accenture plc and offshore companies such as Fujitsu and India-based competitors Wipro Limited, Infosys Limited and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. We also compete with other traditional hardware providers, such as Dell, which are increasingly offering services to support their products, new players in emerging areas like cloud such as Amazon, and smaller local players. Many of our competitors offer a wide range of global services, and some of our competitors enjoy significant brand recognition. ES teams with many companies to offer services, and those arrangements allow us to


Table of Contents

extend our reach and augment our capabilities. Our competitive advantages include our deep technology expertise, especially in complex multi-country, multi-vendor and/or multi-language environments, our differentiated intellectual property, our strong track record of collaboration with clients and partners, and the combination of our expertise in infrastructure management with skilled global resources on platforms from SAP AG ("SAP"), Oracle and Microsoft, among others.

        Software.    The markets in which our Software segment operates are characterized by rapidly changing customer requirements and technologies. We design and develop enterprise IT management software in competition with IBM, CA Technologies, Inc., VMware, BMC Software, Inc. and others. Our big data solutions, which include data analytics, information governance and digital marketing offerings incorporating both structured and unstructured data, compete with products from companies like Adobe Systems Inc., IBM, EMC, Open Text Corporation, Oracle and Symantec Corporation. We also deliver enterprise security/risk intelligence solutions that compete with products from EMC, IBM, Cisco and Intel. As customers are becoming increasingly comfortable with newer delivery mechanisms such as SaaS, we are facing competition from smaller, less traditional competitors, particularly for customers with smaller IT organizations. Our differentiation lies in the breadth and depth of our software, our collaboration with EG and ES to provide comprehensive IT solutions and services portfolio and the scope of our market coverage.

        HP Financial Services.    In our financing business, our competitors are captive financing companies, mainly IBM Global Financing, as well as banks and other financial institutions in our financing business. We believe our competitive advantage in this business over banks and other financial institutions is our ability to deliver flexible investment solutions and expertise that help customers and other partners create unique technology deployments based on specific business needs.

For a discussion of risks attendant to these competitive factors, see "Risk“Risk Factors—We operate in an intensely competitive industry and competitive pressures could harm our business and financial performance," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

reference


Sustainability
Our approach to sustainability covers a broad range of sustainability issues across three pillars: environment, society and integrity. We prioritize issues to address based on their relative importance to our culture, business success and sustainable development.
Environment

. We are focused on reinventing the way that products are designed, manufactured, used and recovered as we shift our business model and operations toward a low carbon and circular economy that promotes greater energy efficiency, resource productivity and waste reduction. Working with our supply chain partners, we strive to reduce the environmental impact of our products at every stage of the value chain.

Society. We are using our technology, innovation and scale to promote a more just and inclusive society. We strive to empower workers and provide protections for the people who make our products. Our agreements with our suppliers require that workers receive fair treatment, safe working conditions and freely chosen employment.  We work to enforce these requirements with suppliers through proactive engagement and training, and corrective action plans when needed. Working with business and nonprofit partners, we deploy our technology, capital and resources to advance quality learning outcomes and digital inclusion.


Integrity. We are committed to acting with integrity, fairness and accountability, which we believe are fundamental to an inclusive society and a thriving business. We also expect ethical behavior by our employees, partners and suppliers, and we have structures, programs, and processes in place to safeguard human rights across our value chain.
Goals. Our current long-term sustainability goals are:
Climate change
Use 100% renewable electricity in our global operations, with an interim goal of 40% by 2020;
Consistent with a science-based reduction target, reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions in our global operations by 25% by 2025, compared to 2015;
Reduce first-tier production supplier and product transport-related GHG emissions intensity (which refers to the portion of first-tier production and product transportation suppliers’ reported GHG emissions attributable to HP divided by HP’s annual net revenue) by 10% by 2025, compared to 2015;
Reduce the GHG intensity of HP’s product portfolio (which refers to tonnes CO2e/net revenue arising from the use of more than 95% of HP product units shipped each year) by 25% by 2020, compared to 2010.
Natural Resources
Achieve zero deforestation associated with HP brand paper and paper-based product packaging (which includes the box that comes with the product and all paper inside the box) by 2020;
Recycle 1.2 million tonnes of hardware and supplies by 2025, since the beginning of 2016; and
Reduce potable water consumption in global operations by 15% by 2025, compared to 2015;
Society
Develop skills and improve well-being of 500,000 factory workers by 2025, since the beginning of 2015;
Double factory participation in our supply chain sustainability programs by 2025, compared to 2015;and
Enable better learning outcomes for 100 million people by 2025, since the beginning of 2015.
Integrity
Maintain greater than 99% completion rate of Standards of Business Conduct training among active HP employees and the Board of Directors.
For more information on our sustainability goals, programs, and performance, we refer you to our annual sustainability report, available on our website (which is not incorporated by reference herein).
Environment
Our operations are subject to regulation under various federal, state, local and foreign laws concerning the environment, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, and third-party damage or personal injury claims, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws.

Many of our products are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws governing chemical substances in products and their safe use, including laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of chemical substances and laws restricting the presence of certain substances in electronics products. SomeMost of our products also are or may in the future be, subject to requirements applicable to their energy consumption. In addition, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of our products, and their safe use,use.
We proactively evaluate and their energy efficiency, includingat times replace materials in our products and supply chain, taking into account, among other things, published lists of substances of concern, new and upcoming legal requirements, relatingcustomer preferences and scientific analysis that indicates a potential impact to climate change. human health or the environment.
We are also subject to legislation in an increasing number of jurisdictions that makes producers of electrical goods, including computers and printers, financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products (sometimes referred to as "product“product take-back legislation"legislation”). We intend for our products to be easily reused and recycled, and we provide many of our customers with reuse and recycling programs.
In the event our products become non-compliant with these laws, our products could be restricted from entering certain jurisdictions and we could face other sanctions, including fines.



Our operations, and ultimately our products, are expected to become increasingly subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and international treaties relating to climate change.


Table We strive to continually improve the energy and carbon efficiency of Contents

our operations and product portfolio and deliver more cost-effective and less greenhouse gas-intensive technology solutions to our customers. As these and other new laws, regulations, treaties and similar initiatives and programs are adopted and implemented throughout the world, we will be required to comply or potentially face market access limitations or other sanctions, including fines. However, weWe believe that technology will be fundamental to finding solutions to achieve compliance with and manage those requirements, and we are collaborating with industry, business groups and governments to find and promote ways that HP technology can be used to address climate change and to facilitate compliance with related laws, regulations and treaties.

We are committed to maintaining compliancecomplying with all environmental laws applicable to our operations, products and services and to reducing our environmental impact across all aspects of our business. We meet this commitment with aour sustainability policy, our comprehensive environmental, health and safety policy, strict environmental management of our operations and worldwide environmental programs and services.

A liability for environmental remediation and other environmental costs is accrued when we consider it probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Environmental costs and accruals are presently not material to our operations, cash flows or financial position. Although there is no assurance that existing or future environmental laws applicable to our operations or products will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, cash flows or financial condition, we do not currently anticipate material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities.

For a discussion of risks attendant to these environmental factors, see "Risk“Risk Factors—Our business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that could result in costs or other sanctions that adversely affect our business and results of operations," in Item 1A, which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, for a discussion of our environmental contingencies see Note 1614, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is also incorporated herein by reference.

Executive Officers

The following are our current executive officers:

Rob Binns; age 47; Head of Global Treasury and Investor Relations

        Mr. Binns has served as Head of Global Treasury and Investor Relations since November 2015. Mr. Binns joined Hewlett-Packard Company in 2006 as Finance Director for HP Software in the Europe, Middle East and Africa regions following the acquisition of Mercury Interactive. Since then, Mr. Binns has held a number of finance and business roles within HP Software, including Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations. Previously, Mr. Binns was Vice President of Investor Relations. Most recently, Mr. Binns was the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for HP Software responsible for driving all finance activities.

Ron Coughlin; age 49;51; President, Personal Systems

Mr. Coughlin has served as President, Personal Systems since November 2015. Mr. Coughlin joined Hewlett-Packard Company from PepsiCo in June 2007 as the senior vice president of the Imaging and Printing Group Worldwide Strategy and Marketing team. In 2010, Mr. Coughlin transitioned to lead the LaserJet and Enterprise Solutions global business unit at Hewlett-Packard Company and later ran Consumer Personal Systems at Hewlett-Packard Company.

Jon Flaxman; age 58;60; Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Flaxman has served as Chief Operating Officer since November 2015. Previously, Mr. Flaxman served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany’s Printing


Table of Contents

and Personal Systems Group. Prior to suchthat role, he was Senior Vice President of Finance for Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany’s Imaging and Printing Group for four years. From March 2007 to November 2008, Mr. Flaxman was Chief Administrative Officer and Executive Vice President of Hewlett-Packard Company. Mr. Flaxman joined Hewlett-Packard Company in 1981.

Tracy S. Keogh; age 54;56; Chief Human Resources Officer

Ms. Keogh has served as Chief Human Resources Officer since November 2015. Previously, Ms. Keogh served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources of Hewlett-Packard Company from April 2011 to November 2015. Prior to joining Hewlett-Packard Company, Ms. Keogh served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources at Hewitt Associates, a provider of human resources consulting services, from May 2007 until March 2011.

Catherine A. Lesjak; age 56;58; Chief Financial Officer

Ms. Lesjak has served as Chief Financial Officer since November 2015. Previously, Ms. Lesjak served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hewlett-Packard Company from 2007 to November 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Lesjak also served as Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany’s interim Chief Executive Officer from August 2010 until November 2010. She also serves as a director of SunPower Corporation.

Enrique Lores; age 50;52; President, Printing, Solutions and Services

Mr. Lores has served as President, Printing, Solutions and Services since November 2015. Throughout his 26-year tenure with Hewlett-Packard Company, Mr. Lores held leadership positions across the organization, most recently leading the


Separation Management Office for HP Inc. Previously, Mr. Lores was the Senior Vice President and General Manager for Business Personal Systems. Before his Business Personal Systems role, Mr. Lores was Senior Vice President of Customer Support and Services.

Marie Myers; age 47;49; Global Controller and Head of Finance Services

Ms. Myers has served as Global Controller and Head of Finance Services since November 2015. Prior to that from October 2014 to October 2015, Ms. Myers was Finance Lead for HP Inc. in the Separation Management Office at Hewlett-Packard Company and held other key leadership roles at Hewlett-Packard Company, including:including Vice President for PPSPrinting and Personal Systems, HQ and Strategy Finance from May 2012 to October 2015 and Vice President of Finance for PSGPersonal Systems Group, Americas from March 2010 to May 2012.

Kim Rivera; age 47;49; Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel

Ms. Rivera has served as Chief Legal Officer, and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since November 2015. Prior to joining us, at DaVita Health Care Partners she served as the Chief Legal Officer from July 2011 to October 2015, asand Corporate Secretary at DaVita Health Care Partners where she was employed from January 2010 to December 2013 and as Vice President and General Counsel from January 2010 to July 2011.2015. From February 2006 to November 2009, she served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel at The Clorox Company. Prior to that, Ms. Rivera served as Vice President Law and Chief Litigation Counsel to Rockwell Automation as well as General Counsel for its Automation Controls and Information Group.

Dion J. Weisler; age 48;50; President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Weisler has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2015. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President of the Printing and Personal Systems Group of Hewlett-Packard Company from June 2013 to November 2015 and as Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Printing and Personal Systems, Asia Pacific and Japan from January 2012 to June 2013. Prior to joining


Table of Contents

Hewlett-Packard Company, he was Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Product and Mobile Internet Digital Home Groups at Lenovo Group Ltd., a technology company, from January 2008 to December 2011.

Employees

We had approximately 287,00049,000 employees worldwide as of October 31, 2015.

2017.

Available Information

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available on our website at http://www.hp.com/investor/home, as soon as reasonably practicable after HP electronically files such reports with, or furnishes those reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. HP'sHP’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board of Directors'Directors’ committee charters (including the charters of the Audit Committee, Finance, Investment and InvestmentTechnology Committee, HR and Compensation Committee, Technology Committee, and Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee) and code of ethics entitled "Standards“Standards of Business Conduct"Conduct” (none of which are incorporated by reference herein) are also available at that same location on our website. Stockholders may request free copies of these documents from:

HP Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
1501 Page Mill Road,
Palo Alto, CA 94304
http://www.hp.com/investor/informationrequest

Additional Information

Microsoft® and Windows® are U.S.-registeredeither registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Intel®, Itanium® , Intel®AtomTM, and Intel® Itanium® are trademarks is a trademark of Intel Corporation in the United States andand/or other countries. AMD is a trademark of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ARM®Google is a registered trademark of ARM Limited. UNIX® is a registered trademarkGoogle Inc. All other trademarks are the property of The Open Group.

their respective owners.

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be important for understanding any statement in this Form 10-K or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation"Operation” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8, "Financial“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"Data” of this Form 10-K.



Because of the following factors, as well as other variables affecting our results of operations, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

Risks related to our business

If we are unsuccessful at addressing our business challenges, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected and our ability to invest in and grow our business could be limited.

        We are in the process of addressing

Our business faces many challenges facing our business.we must address. One set of challenges relates to dynamic and accelerating market trends, such as the declinewhich may include declines in the PC market, the growth of multi-architecture devices running competing operating systems and movement to continuous ink supply systems.markets in which we operate. A second set of challenges relates to changes in the competitive landscape. Our major competitors are expanding their product and service offerings with integrated products and solutions; our business-specificprimary competitors are exerting increased competitive pressure in targeted areas and are entering new markets; our emerging competitors are introducing new technologies and business models; and our alliance partners in some businesses are increasingly becoming our competitors in others. A third set of challenges relates to business model changes and our go-to-market execution. For example, we may fail to develop innovative products and services, maintain the manufacturing quality of our products, manage our distribution network or successfully market new products and services, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

In addition, we are facing a series of significant macroeconomic challenges, including weakness across many geographic regions, particularly in Centralemerging markets and Eastern Europe, and Russia, and certain countries and businesses in Asia. We may experience delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our efforts to address these challenges and higher than expected or unanticipated execution costs. In addition, we are vulnerable to increased risks associated with our efforts to address these challenges given our large and diverse portfolio of businesses,the markets in which we compete, the broad range of geographic regions in which we and our customers and partners operate, and the ongoing integration of acquired businesses. If we do not succeed in these efforts, or if these efforts are more costly or time-consuming than expected, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected, which could limit our ability to invest in and grow our business.

We operate in an intensely competitive industry and competitive pressures could harm our business and financial performance.

We encounter aggressive competition from numerous and varied competitors in all areas of our business, and our competitors have targeted and are expected to continue targeting our key market segments. We compete primarily on the basis of our technology, innovation, performance, price, quality, reliability, brand, reputation, distribution, range of products and services, ease of use of our products, account relationships, customer training, service and support and security. If our products, services, support and cost structure do not enable us to compete successfully, based on any of those criteria, our results of operations and business prospects could be harmed.

We have a large portfolio of products and must allocate our financial, personnel and other resources across all of our products while competing with companies that have smaller portfolios or


Table of Contents

specialize in one or more of our product lines. As a result, we may invest less in certain areas of our business than our competitors do, and our competitors may have greater financial, technical and marketing resources available to them compared to the resources allocated to our products and services that compete against their products.

Companies with whom we have alliances in certain areas may be or may become our competitors in other areas. In addition, companies with whom we have alliances also may acquire or form alliances with our competitors, which could reduce their business with us. If we are unable to effectively manage these complicated relationships with alliance partners, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We face aggressive price competition and may have to continue lowering the prices of many of our products and services to stay competitive, while at the same time trying to maintain or improve our revenue and gross margin. In addition, competitors who have a greater presence in some of the lower-cost markets in which we compete, or who can obtain better pricing, more favorable contractual terms and conditions, or more favorable allocations of products and components during periods of limited supply, may be able to offer lower prices than we are able to offer. Our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by these and other industry-wide pricing pressures.

Industry consolidation may also affect competition by creating larger, more homogeneous and potentially stronger competitors in the markets in which we operate. Additionally, our competitors may affect our business by entering into exclusive arrangements with our existing or potential customers or suppliers.

Because our business model is based on providing innovative and high-quality products, we may spend a proportionately greater amount of our revenues on research and development than some of our competitors. If we cannot proportionately decrease our cost structure (apart from research and development expenses) on a timely basis in response to competitive price


pressures, our gross margin and, therefore, our profitability could be adversely affected. In addition, if our pricing and other facets of our offerings are not sufficiently competitive, or if there is an adverse reaction to our product decisions, we may lose market share in certain areas, which could adversely affect our financial performance and business prospects.

Even if we are able to maintain or increase market share for a particular product, its financial performance could decline because the product is in a maturing industry or market segment or contains technology that is becoming obsolete. Financial performance could decline due to increased competition from other types of products. For example, growing demand for an increasing array of mobile computing devices has reduced demand for some of our existing hardware products. In addition, refill and remanufactured alternatives for some of our LaserJet toner and inkjet cartridges compete with our printing supplies business.

If we cannot successfully execute our go-to-market strategy and continue to develop, manufacture and market innovative products services and solutions,services, our business and financial performance may suffer.

Our strategy is focused on leveraging our existing portfolio of products services and solutionsservices to meet the demands of a continually changing technological landscape and to offset certain areas of industry decline. To successfully execute this strategy, we must emphasize the aspects of our core business where demand remains strong, identify and capitalize on natural areas of growth, and innovate and develop new products and services that will enable us to expand beyond our existing technology categories. Any failure to successfully execute this strategy, including any failure to invest sufficiently in strategic growth areas, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.


Table of Contents

The process of developing new high-technology products services and solutionsservices and enhancing existing hardwareproducts and software products, services and solutions is complex, costly and uncertain, and any failure by us to anticipate customers'customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends accurately could significantly harm our market share, results of operations and financial condition. For example, to offset industry declines in some of our businesses, we must successfully grow in adjacencies such as copier printers, maintain our strong position in graphics, develop and introduce 3D printers and execute on our strategy to grow commercial mobility by providing specialized products and services to address the needs of our customers. We must make long-term investments, develop or obtainacquire and appropriately protect appropriate intellectual property, and commit significant research and development and other resources before knowing whether our predictions will accurately reflect customer demand for our products and services. Any failure to accurately predict technological and business trends, control research and development costs or execute our innovation strategy could harm our business and financial performance. Our research and development initiatives may not be successful in whole or in part, including research and development projects which we have prioritized with respect to funding and/or personnel.

Our industry is subject to rapid and substantial innovation and technological change. Even if we successfully develop new products and technologies, future products and technologies may eventually supplant ours if we are unable to keep pace with technological advances and end-user requirements and preferences and timely enhance our existing products and technologies or develop new ones. Our competitors may also create products that replace ours. As a result, any of our products and technologies may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical.
After we develop a product, we must be able to manufacture appropriate volumes quickly while also managing costs and preserving margins. To accomplish this, we must accurately forecast volumes, mixes of products and configurations that meet customer requirements, and we may not succeed at doing so within a given product'sproduct’s lifecycle or at all. Any delay in the development, production or marketing of a new product, service or solution could result in us not being among the first to market, which could further harm our competitive position.

If we cannot continue to produce quality products and services, our reputation, business and financial performance may suffer.

In the course of conducting our business, we must adequately address quality issues associated with our products and services, including defects in our engineering, design and manufacturing processes and unsatisfactory performance under service contracts, as well as defects in third-party components included in our products and unsatisfactory performance or even malicious acts by third-party contractors or subcontractors or their employees. In order to address quality issues, we work extensively with our customers and suppliers and engage in product testing to determine the causes of problems and to develop and implement appropriate solutions. However, the products and services that we offer are complex, and our regular testing and quality control efforts may not be effective in controlling or detecting all quality issues or errors, particularly with respect to faulty components manufactured by third-parties. If we are unable to determine the cause or find an appropriate solution to address quality issues with our products, we may delay shipment to customers, which would delay revenue recognition and receipt of customer payments and could adversely affect our net revenue, cash flows and profitability. In addition, after products are delivered, quality issues may require us to repair or replace such products. Addressing quality issues can be expensive and may result in additional warranty, repair, replacement and other costs, adversely affecting our financial performance. If new or existing customers have difficulty operating our products or are dissatisfied with our services, our results of operations could be adversely affected, and we could face possible claims if we fail to meet our customers' customers’


expectations. In addition, quality issues can impair our relationships with new or existing customers and adversely affect our brand and reputation, which could, in turn, adversely affect our results of operations.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

rates, which could adversely impact our results.

Currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including the euro, the British pound, Chinese yuan (renminbi) and the Japanese yen, can have an impact on our results as expressed in U.S. dollars. In particular, the economic uncertainties relating to European sovereign and other debt obligations and the related European financial restructuring efforts may cause the value of the euro to fluctuate.


Table of Contents

In addition, the United Kingdom’s June 2016 vote to leave the European Union (commonly known as “Brexit”) caused significant volatility in currency exchange rates, especially between the U.S. dollar and the British pound. Global economic events and uncertainty may cause currencies to fluctuate and currency volatility contributes to variations in our sales of products and services in impacted jurisdictions. For example, in the event that one or more European countries were to replace the euro with another currency, our sales into such countries, or into Europe generally, would likely be adversely affected until stable exchange rates are established. Accordingly, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, such as the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro or the British pound or the weakness of the Japanese yen, could adversely affect our net revenue growth in future periods. In addition, currency variations can adversely affect margins on sales of our products in countries outside of the United States and margins on sales of products that include components obtained from suppliers located outside of the United States.

From time to time, we may use forward contracts and options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks. The effectiveness of our hedges depends on our ability to accurately forecast future cash flows, which is particularly difficult during periods of uncertain demand for our products and services and highly volatile exchange rates. We may incur significant losses from our hedging activities due to factors such as demand volatility and currency variations.volatility. In addition, certain or all of our hedging activities may be ineffective may expire and not be renewed or may not offset any or more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from currency variations. Losses associated with hedging activities also may impact our revenue, financial condition and, to a lesser extent, our cost of sales.

Recent global, regional and local economic weakness and uncertainty could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Our business and financial performance depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions and the demand for technology products and services in the markets in which we compete. Recent economic weakness and uncertainty in various markets throughout the world have resulted, and may result in the future, in decreased net revenue, gross margin, earnings or growth rates and in increased expenses and difficulty in managing inventory levels. For example, until recently we are continuing to experienceexperienced the impacts of macroeconomic weakness across many geographic regions, particularly in the Europe, the Middle East and Africa region, China and certain other high-growth markets.markets, and we may experience similar impacts in these or other regions in the future. Ongoing U.S. federal government spending limits may continue to reduce demand for our products and services from organizations that receive funding from the U.S. government, and could negatively affect macroeconomic conditions in the United States, which could further reduce demand for our products and services. The continuing uncertainty surrounding the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union may negatively impact markets and cause weaker macroeconomic conditions.
Economic weakness and uncertainty may adversely affect demand for our products and services, may result in increased expenses due to higher allowances for doubtful accounts and potential goodwill and asset impairment charges, and may make it more difficult for us to make accurate forecasts of revenue, gross margin, cash flows and expenses.

We also have experienced, and may experience in the future, gross margin declines in certain businesses, reflecting the effect of items such as competitive pricing pressures and increases in component and manufacturing costs resulting from higher labor and material costs borne by our manufacturers and suppliers that, as a result of competitive pricing pressures or other factors, we are unable to pass on to our customers. In addition, our business may be disrupted if we are unable to obtain equipment, parts or components from our suppliers—and our suppliers from their suppliers—due to the insolvency of key suppliers or the inability of key suppliers to obtain credit.

Economic weakness and uncertainty could cause our expenses to vary materially from our expectations. Any financial turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets or any significant financial services institution failures could negatively impact our treasury operations, as the financial condition of such parties may deteriorate rapidly and without notice in times of market volatility and disruption. Poor financial performance of asset markets combined with lower interest rates and the adverse effects of fluctuating currency exchange rates could lead to higher pension and post-retirement benefit expenses. Interest and other expenses could vary materially from expectations depending on


Table of Contents

changes in interest rates, borrowing costs, currency exchange rates, costs of hedging activities and the fair value of derivative instruments. Economic downturns also may lead to future restructuring actions and associated expenses.



The net revenue and profitability of our operations have historically varied, which makes our future financial results less predictable.

Our net revenue, gross margin and profit vary among our diverse products and services, customer groups and geographic markets and therefore will likely be different in future periods than our current results. Our net revenue depends on the overall demand for our products and services. Delays or reductions in hardware and related services spending by our customers or potential customers could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services, which could result in a significant decline in net revenue. In addition, net revenue declines in some of our businesses may affect net revenue in our other businesses as we may lose cross-selling opportunities. Overall gross margins and profitability in any given period are dependent partially on the product, service, customer and geographic mix reflected in that period'speriod’s net revenue. Competition, lawsuits, investigations, increases in component and manufacturing costs that we are unable to pass on to our customers, component supply disruptions and other risks affecting those businesses therefore may have a significant impact on our overall gross margin and profitability. In addition, newer geographic markets may be relatively less profitable due to our investments associated with entering those markets and local pricing pressures, and we may have difficulty establishing and maintaining the operating infrastructure necessary to support the high growth rate associated with some of those markets. Market trends, industry shifts, competitive pressures, commoditization of products, increased component or shipping costs, regulatory impacts and other factors may result in reductions in revenue or pressure on gross margins in a given period, which may lead to adjustments to our operations. Moreover, our efforts to address the challenges facing our business could increase the level of variability in our financial results because the rate at which we are able to realize the benefits from those efforts may vary from period to period.

If we fail to manage the distribution of our products and services properly, our business and financial performance could suffer.

We use a variety of distribution methods to sell our products and services around the world, including third-party resellers and distributors and both direct and indirect sales to enterprise accounts and consumers. Successfully managing the interaction of our direct and indirect channel efforts to reach various potential customer segments for our products and services is a complex process. Moreover, since each distribution method has distinct risks and gross margins, our failure to implement the most advantageous balance in the delivery model for our products and services could adversely affect our net revenue and gross margins and therefore our profitability.

Our financial results could be materially adversely affected due to distribution channel conflicts or if the financial conditions of our channel partners were to weaken. Our results of operations may be adversely affected by any conflicts that might arise between our various distribution channels or the loss or deterioration of any alliance or distribution arrangement or the loss of retail shelf space. Moreover, some of our wholesale and retail distributors may have insufficient financial resources and may not be able to withstand changes in business conditions, including economic weakness, industry consolidation and market trends. Many of our significant distributors operate on narrow margins and have been negatively affected by business pressures in the past. Considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral or credit insurance are outstanding with our distribution and retail channel partners. RevenueNet revenue from indirect sales could suffer, and we could experience disruptions in distribution, if our distributors'distributors’ financial conditions, abilities to borrow funds in the credit markets or operations weaken.


Table of Contents

Our inventory management is complex, as we continue to sell a significant mix of products through distributors. We must manage both owned and channel inventory effectively, particularly with respect to sales to distributors, which involves forecasting demand and pricing challenges. Distributors may increase orders during periods of product shortages, cancel orders if their inventory is too high or delay orders in anticipation of new products. Distributors also may adjust their orders in response to the supply of our products and the products of our competitors and seasonal fluctuations in end-user demand. Our reliance upon indirect distribution methods may reduce our visibility into demand and pricing trends and issues, and therefore make forecasting more difficult. If we have excess or obsolete inventory, we may have to reduce our prices and write down inventory. Moreover, our use of indirect distribution channels may limit our willingness or ability to adjust prices quickly and otherwise to respond to pricing changes by competitors. We also may have limited ability to estimate future product rebate redemptions in order to price our products effectively.

We depend on third-party suppliers, and our financial results could suffer if we fail to manage our suppliers effectively.

Our operations depend on our ability to anticipate our needs for components, products and services, as well as our suppliers'suppliers’ ability to deliver sufficient quantities of quality components, products and services at reasonable prices and in time for us to meet critical schedules for the delivery of our own products and services. Given the wide variety of systems, products and services that we offer, the large number of our suppliers and contract manufacturers that are located around the world, and the long lead times required to manufacture, assemble and deliver certain components and products, problems could arise in production, planning and inventory management that could seriously harm our business. In addition, our ongoing efforts to optimize the efficiency of our supply chain could cause supply disruptions and be more expensive, time-consuming and resource intensiveresource-intensive than expected. Furthermore, certain of our suppliers may decide to discontinue conducting business with us.


Other supplier problems that we could face include component shortages, excess supply, risks related to the terms of our contracts with suppliers, risks associated with contingent workers, risks related to supply chain working conditions and materials sourcing and risks related to our relationships with single sourcesingle-source suppliers, each of which is described below.

Component shortages.  We may experience a shortage of, or a delay in receiving, certain components as a result of strong demand, capacity constraints, supplier financial weaknesses, the inability of suppliers to borrow funds in the credit markets, disputes with suppliers (some of whom are also our customers), disruptions in the operations of component suppliers, other problems experienced by suppliers or problems faced during the transition to new suppliers. For example, our PC business relies heavily upon OMs to manufacture its products and is therefore dependent upon the continuing operations of those OMs to fulfill demand for our PC products. We represent a substantial portion of the business of some of these OMs, and any changes to the nature or volume of our business transactions with a particular OM could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of the OM and lead to shortages or delays in receiving products from that OM. If shortages or delays persist, the price of certain components may increase, we may be exposed to quality issues or the components may not be available at all. We may not be able to secure enough components at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build products or provide services in a timely manner in the quantities needed or according to our specifications. Accordingly, our business and financial performance could suffer if we lose time-sensitive sales, incur additional freight costs or are unable to pass on price increases to our customers. If we cannot adequately address supply issues, we might have to reengineerre-engineer some product or service offerings, which could result in further costs and delays.


Excess supply.  In order to secure components for our products or services, at times we may make advance payments to suppliers or enter into non-cancelable commitments with vendors. In addition, we may purchase components strategically in advance of demand to take advantage of

Table of Contents

      favorable pricing or to address concerns about the availability of future components. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, a temporary oversupply could result in excess or obsolete components, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Contractual terms.  As a result of binding long-term price or purchase commitments with vendors, we may be obligated to purchase components or services at prices that are higher than those available in the current market and be limited in our ability to respond to changing market conditions. If we commit to purchasing components or services for prices in excess of the then-current market price, we may be at a disadvantage to competitors who have access to components or services at lower prices, our gross margin could suffer, and we could incur additional charges relating to inventory obsolescence. In addition, many of our competitors obtain products or components from the same OMs and suppliers that we utilize. Our competitors may obtain better pricing, more favorable contractual terms and conditions, and more favorable allocations of products and components during periods of limited supply, and our ability to engage in relationships with certain OMs and suppliers could be limited. The practice employed by our PC business of purchasing product components and transferring those components to its OMs may create large supplier receivables with the OMs that, depending on the financial condition of the OMs, may create collectability risks. In addition, certain of our OMs and suppliers may decide to discontinue conducting business with us. Any of these developments could adversely affect our future results of operations and financial condition.


Contingent workers.  We also rely on third-party suppliers for the provision of contingent workers, and our failure to manage our use of such workers effectively could adversely affect our results of operations. We have been exposed to various legal claims relating to the status of contingent workers in the past and could face similar claims in the future. We may be subject to shortages, oversupply or fixed contractual terms relating to contingent workers. Our ability to manage the size of, and costs associated with, the contingent workforce may be subject to additional constraints imposed by local laws.


Working conditions and materials sourcing.
We work with our suppliers to improve their labor practices and working conditions, such as by including requirements in our agreements with our suppliers that working conditions in our supply chain must be safe, that workers receive fair treatment, safe working conditions and freely chosen employment, that materials are responsibly sourced and that business operations are conducted in an environmentally responsible and ethical way. Brand perception and customer loyalty could be adversely impacted by a supplier’s improper practices or failure to comply with the above-mentioned requirements or those included in our Supplier Code of Conduct, General Specification for the Environment and other related provisions and requirements of our procurement contracts, including supplier audits, reporting of smelters, wood fiber certification (for HP brand paper and product packaging) and GHG emissions, water and waste data.
Single-source suppliers.  We obtain a significant number of components from single sources due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. For example, we rely on Canon for certain laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges. We also rely on Intel to provide us with a sufficient supply of processors for many of our PCs and workstations, and we rely on AMD to provide us with a sufficient supply of processors for other


products. Some of those processors are customized for our products. New products that we introduce may utilize custom components obtained from only one source initially until we have evaluated whether there is a need for additional suppliers. Replacing a single-source supplier could delay production of some products as replacement suppliers may be subject to capacity constraints or other output limitations. For some components, such as customized components and some of the processors that we obtain from Intel, or the laser printer engines and toner cartridges that we obtain from Canon, alternative sources either may not exist or may be unable to produce the quantities of those components necessary to satisfy our production requirements. In addition, we sometimes purchase components from single-source suppliers under short-term agreements that contain favorable pricing and other terms but that may be unilaterally modified or terminated by the supplier with limited notice and with little or no penalty. The performance of such single-source suppliers under those agreements (and the renewal or extension of those agreements upon similar terms) may affect the quality, quantity and price of our components. The loss of a single-source supplier, the deterioration of our relationship with a single-source supplier, or any unilateral modification to the contractual terms under which we are supplied components by a single sourcesingle-source supplier could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Table of Contents

Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Our worldwide operations could be disrupted by earthquakes, telecommunications failures, power or water shortages, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions (whether as a result of climate change or otherwise), medical epidemics or pandemics and other natural or manmade disasters or catastrophic events, for which we are predominantly self-insured. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could result in significant losses, seriously harm our revenue, profitability and financial condition, adversely affect our competitive position, increase our costs and expenses, and require substantial expenditures and recovery time in order to fully resume operations. Our corporate headquarters and a portion of our research and development activities are located in California, and other critical business operations and some of our suppliers are located in California and Asia, near major earthquake faults known for seismic activity. The manufacture of product components, the final assembly of our products and other critical operations are concentrated in certain geographic locations. We also rely on major logistics hubs primarily in Asia to manufacture and distribute our products, and primarily in the southwestern United States to import products into the Americas region. Our operations could be adversely affected if manufacturing, logistics or other operations in these locations are disrupted for any reason, including natural disasters, IT system failures, military actionssuch as those listed above or other economic, business, labor, environmental, public health, regulatory or political issues. The ultimate impact on us, our significant suppliers and our general infrastructure of being located near locations more vulnerable to the occurrence of the aforementioned business disruptions, such as near major earthquake faults, and being consolidated in certain geographical areas is unknown and remains uncertain.

Our uneven sales cycle makes planning and inventory management difficult and future financial results less predictable.

Our quarterly sales often have reflected a pattern in which a disproportionate percentage of each quarter'squarter’s total sales occurs towards the end of the quarter. This uneven sales pattern makes predicting net revenue, earnings, cash flow from operations and working capital for each financial period difficult, increases the risk of unanticipated variations in our quarterly results and financial condition and places pressure on our inventory management and logistics systems. If predicted demand is substantially greater than orders, there may be excess inventory. Alternatively, if orders substantially exceed predicted demand, we may not be able to fulfill all of the orders received in each quarter and such orders may be cancelled.canceled. Depending on when they occur in a quarter, developments such as a systems failure, component pricing movements, component shortages or global logistics disruptions could adversely impact our inventory levels and results of operations in a manner that is disproportionate to the number of days in the quarter affected.

We experience some seasonal trends in the sale of our products that also may produce variations in our quarterly results and financial condition. For example, sales to governments (particularly sales to the U.S. government) are often stronger in the third calendar quarter, and many customers whose fiscal year is the calendar year spend their remaining capital budget authorizations in the fourth calendar quarter prior to new budget constraints in the first calendar quarter of the following year. Consumer sales are often higher in the fourth calendar quarter compared to other quarters due in part to seasonal holiday demand. European sales are often weaker during the summer months. Demand during the spring and early summer also may be adversely impacted by market anticipation of seasonal trends. Moreover, to the extent that we introduce new products in anticipation of seasonal demand trends, our discounting of existing products may adversely affect our gross margin prior to or shortly after such product launches. Typically, our third fiscal quarter is our weakest and our fourth fiscal quarter is our strongest. Many of the factors that create and affect seasonal trends are beyond our control.


Table of Contentscontents



Due to the international nature of our business, political or economic changes, uncertainty or other factors could harm our business and financial performance.

        Sales outside the United States made up approximately 64%

Approximately 63% of our net revenue for fiscal 2015.year 2017 came from outside the United States. In addition, a portion of our business activity is being conducted in emerging markets. Our future business and financial performance could suffer due to a variety of international factors, including:

ongoing instability or changes in a country'scountry’s or region'sregion’s economic, regulatory or political conditions, including inflation, recession, interest rate fluctuations and actual or anticipated military or political conflicts;

conflicts or any other change resulting from Brexit;
longer collection cycles and financial instability among customers;

customers, the imposition by governments of additional taxes, tariffs or other restrictions on foreign trade or changes in restrictions on trade between the United States and other countries;
trade regulations and procedures and actions affecting production, shipping, pricing and marketing of products, including policies adopted by the United States or other countries that may champion or otherwise favor domestic companies and technologies over foreign competitors;

local labor conditions and regulations, including local labor issues faced by specific suppliers and OEMs;

managing a geographically dispersed workforce;

changes or uncertainty in the international, national or local regulatory and legal environments;

differing technology standards or customer requirements;

import, export or other business licensing requirements or requirements relating to making foreign direct investments, which could increase our cost of doing business in certain jurisdictions, prevent us from shipping products to particular countries or markets, affect our ability to obtain favorable terms for components, increase our operating costs or lead to penalties or restrictions;

stringent privacy and data protection policies in some foreign countries;
difficulties associated with repatriating earnings generated or held abroad in a tax-efficient manner and changes in tax laws; and

fluctuations in freight costs, limitations on shipping and receiving capacity, and other disruptions in the transportation and shipping infrastructure at important geographic points of exit and entry for our products and shipments.

The factors described above also could disrupt our product and component manufacturing and key suppliers located outside of the United States. For example, we rely on manufacturers in Taiwan for the production of notebook computers and other suppliers in Asia for product assembly and manufacture.

In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, there are companies that engage in business practices prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the "FCPA"“FCPA”). Although we implement policies, procedures and training designed to facilitate compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors and agents, as well as those of the companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, may take actions in violation of our policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.


Table of Contents

Any failure by us to identify, manage and complete acquisitions, divestitures and other significant transactions successfully could harm our financial results, business and prospects.

As part of our business strategy, we may acquire companies or businesses, divest businesses or assets, enter into strategic alliances and joint ventures and make investments to further our business (collectively, "business“business combination and investment transactions"transactions”). Risks associated with business combination and investment transactions include the following, any of which could adversely affect our revenue, gross margin, profitability and financial results:

Managing business combination and investment transactions requires varying levels of management resources, which may divert our attention from other business operations.

We may not fully realize all of the anticipated benefits of any particular business combination and investment transaction, and the timeframe for realizing the benefits of a particular business combination and investment transaction may depend partially upon the actions of employees, advisors, suppliers, other third-parties or market trends.

Certain prior business combination and investment transactions entered into by Hewlett-Packard Company resulted, and in the future any such transactions by us may result, in significant costs and expenses, including
Table of contents


those related to severance pay, early retirement costs, employee benefit costs, goodwill and asset impairment charges, charges from the elimination of duplicative facilities and contracts, asset impairment charges, inventory adjustments, assumed litigation and other liabilities, legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, and required payments to executive officers and key employees under retention plans.

Any increased or unexpected costs, unanticipated delays or failure to meet contractual obligations could make business combination and investment transactions less profitable or unprofitable.

Our ability to conduct due diligence with respect to business combination and investment transactions, and our ability to evaluate the results of such due diligence, is dependent upon the veracity and completeness of statements and disclosures made or actions taken by third-parties or their representatives.

The pricing and other terms of our contracts for business combination and investment transactions require us to make estimates and assumptions at the time we enter into these contracts, and, during the course of our due diligence, we may not identify all of the factors necessary to estimate accurately our costs, timing and other matters or we may incur costs if a business combination is not consummated.

In order to complete a business combination and investment transaction, we may issue common stock, potentially creating dilution for our existing stockholders.

We may borrow to finance business combination and investment transactions, and the amount and terms of any potential future acquisition-related or other borrowings, as well as other factors, could affect our liquidity and financial condition.

Our effective tax rate on an ongoing basis is uncertain, and business combination and investment transactions could adversely impact our effective tax rate.

An
Any announced business combination and investment transaction may not close on the expected timeframe or at all, which may cause our financial results to differ from expectations in a given quarter.

Business combination and investment transactions may lead to litigation, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

We have incurred and will incur additional depreciation and amortization expense over the useful lives of certain assets acquired in connection with business combination and investment transactions, and, to the extent that the value of goodwill or intangible assets acquired in connection with a business combination and investment transaction becomes impaired, we may be required to incur additional material charges relating to the impairment of those assets. If there are future decreases in our stock price or significant changes in the business climate or results of operations of our reporting units, we may incur additional charges, which may include goodwill impairment or intangible asset charges.

As part of our business strategy, we regularly evaluate the potential disposition of assets and businesses that may no longer help us meet our objectives. When we decide to sell assets or a business, we may encounter difficulty in finding buyers or alternative exit strategies on acceptable terms in a timely manner, which could delay the achievement of our strategic objectives. We may also dispose of a business at a price or on terms that are less desirable than we had anticipated. In addition, we may experience greater dis-synergies than expected, and the impact of the divestiture on our revenue growth may be larger than projected. After reaching an agreement with a buyer or seller for the acquisition or disposition of a business, we are subject to satisfaction of pre-closing conditions as well as to necessary regulatory and governmental approvals on acceptable terms, which, if not satisfied or obtained, may prevent us from completing the transaction. DispositionsSuch regulatory and governmental approvals may also involve continued financial involvementbe required in diverse jurisdictions around the world, including jurisdictions with opaque regulatory frameworks, and any delays in the divested business,timing of such as through continuing equity ownership, guarantees, indemnitiesapprovals could materially delay the transaction or other financial obligations. Under these arrangements, performance by the divested businesses or other conditions outside of our control could affect our future financial results.

prevent it from closing.

Integrating acquisitions may be difficult and time-consuming. Any failure by us to integrate acquired companies, products or services into our overall business in a timely manner could harm our financial results, business and prospects.

In order to pursue our strategy successfully, we must identify candidates for and successfully complete business combination and investment transactions, some of which (such as our acquisition of Samsung’s printer business) may be large or complex, and manage post-closing issues such as the integration of acquired businesses, products, services or employees. Integration issues are often time-consuming and expensive and, without proper planning and implementation, could significantly disrupt our business and the acquired business. The challenges involved in integration include:

successfully combining product and service offerings and entering or expanding into markets in which we are not experienced or are developing expertise;
Table of contents


convincing both our customers and distributors and those of the acquired business that the transaction will not diminish client service standards or business focus;

persuading both our customers and distributors and those of the acquired business not to defer purchasing decisions or switch to other suppliers (which could result in our incurring additional obligations in order to address customer uncertainty), minimizing sales force attrition and expanding and coordinating sales, marketing and distribution efforts;

consolidating and rationalizing corporate IT infrastructure, which may include multiple legacy systems from various acquisitions and integrating software code and business processes;

minimizing the diversion of management attention from ongoing business concerns;

Table of Contents

We may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of our restructuring plan and our restructuring may adversely affect our business.

We announced a restructuring plan in September 2015October 2016 to realign our cost structure due to the changing nature of our business and to achieve operating efficiencies that we expect to reduce costs. WeImplementation of the restructuring plan may be costly and disruptive to our business, and we may not be able to obtain the cost savings and benefits that were initially anticipated in connection with our restructuring. Additionally, as a result of our restructuring, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge and/or inefficiency during transitional periods. Reorganization and restructuring can require a significant amount of management and other employees'employees’ time and focus, which may divert attention from operating and growing our business. If we fail to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of restructuring, it could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For more information about our October 2016 restructuring plan, including details regarding the plan announced in September 2015, see Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

Our financial performance may suffer if we cannot continue to develop, license or enforce the intellectual property rights on which our businesses depend.

We rely upon patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws in the United States, similar laws in other countries, and agreements with our employees, customers, suppliers and other parties, to establish and maintain intellectual property (“IP”) rights in the products and services we sell, provide or otherwise use in our operations. However, any of our intellectual property rights could be challenged, invalidated, infringed or circumvented, or such intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or to otherwise provide competitive advantages, either of which could result in costly product redesign efforts, discontinuance of certain product offerings or other harm to our competitive position. For example, our enforcement of inkjet printer supplies IP against infringers may be successfully challenged or our IP may be successfully circumvented. Further, the laws of certain countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Therefore, in certain jurisdictions we may be unable to protect our proprietary technology adequately against unauthorized third-party copying or use; this, too, could adversely affect our ability to sell products or services and our competitive position.

Our products and services depend in part on intellectual property and technology licensed from third parties.

Some of our business and some of our products rely on key technologies developed or licensed by third-parties.third parties. We may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third-partiesthird parties at all or on reasonable terms, or such third-partiesthird parties may demand cross-licenses to our intellectual property. For example, some of our software offerings are developed using software components or other intellectual property licensed from third parties, including through both proprietary and open source licenses. These third-party softwareThird-party components may become obsolete,


Table of Contents

defective or incompatible with future versions of our products, or our relationship with the third party may deteriorate, or our agreements with the third party may expire or be terminated. We may face legal or business disputes with licensors that may threaten or lead to the disruption of inbound licensing relationships. In order to remain in compliance with the terms of our licenses, we must carefully monitor and manage our use of third-party software components, including both proprietary and open source license terms that may require the licensing or public disclosure of our intellectual property without compensation or on undesirable terms. Additionally, some of these licenses may not be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable or that allow our product offerings to remain competitive. Our inability to obtain licenses or rights on favorable terms could have a material effect on our business, including our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, it is possible that as a

Table of contents


consequence of a merger or acquisition, third-partiesthird parties may obtain licenses to some of our intellectual property rights or our business may be subject to certain restrictions that were not in place prior to such transaction. Because the availability and cost of licenses from third parties depends upon the willingness of third parties to deal with us on the terms we request, there is a risk that third parties who license to our competitors will either refuse to license to us at all, or refuse to license to us on terms equally favorable to those granted to our competitors. Consequently, we may lose a competitive advantage with respect to these intellectual property rights or we may be required to enter into costly arrangements in order to terminate or limit these rights.

Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement are commonplace in the ITour industry and successful third-party claims may limit or disrupt our ability to sell our products and services.

        Third-parties

Third parties also may claim that we or customers indemnified by us are infringing upon their intellectual property rights. For example, patent assertion entities may purchase intellectual property assets for the purpose of asserting claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies such as HP Inc.us and our customers. If we cannot or do not license allegedly infringed intellectual property at all or on reasonable terms, or if we are required to substitute similar technology from another source, our operations could be adversely affected. Even if we believe that intellectual property claims are without merit, they can be time-consuming and costly to defend against and may divert management'smanagement’s attention and resources away from our business. Claims of intellectual property infringement also might require us to redesign affected products, enter into costly settlement or license agreements, pay costly damage awards, or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from importing, marketing or selling certain of our products. Even if we have an agreement to indemnify us against such costs, the indemnifying party may be unable or unwilling to uphold its contractual obligations to us.

Further, our results of operations and cash flows have been and could continue to be affected in certain periods and on an ongoing basis by the imposition, accrual and payment of copyright levies or similar fees. In certain countries (primarily in Europe), proceedings are ongoing or have been concluded involving our company in which groups representing copyright owners have sought or are seeking to impose upon and collect from HP Inc.us levies upon equipment (such as PCs, MFDs and printers) alleged to be copying devices under applicable laws. Other such groups have also sought to modify existing levy schemes to increase the amount of the levies that can be collected from us. Other countries that have not imposed levies on these types of devices are expected to extend existing levy schemes, and countries that do not currently have levy schemes may decide to impose copyright levies on these types of devices. The total amount of the copyright levies will depend on the types of products determined to be subject to the levy, the number of units of those products sold during the period covered by the levy, and the per unit fee for each type of product, all of which are affected by several factors, including the outcome of ongoing litigation involving us and other industry participants and possible action by the legislative bodies in the applicable countries, and could be substantial. Consequently, the ultimate impact of these copyright levies or similar fees, and our ability to recover such amounts through increased prices, remains uncertain.


Table of Contents

The allocation of intellectual property rights between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company ("Hewlett Packard Enterprise") and HP Inc. as part of the Separation, and the shared use of certain intellectual property rights following the Separation, could adversely impact our reputation, our ability to enforce certain intellectual property rights that are important to us and our competitive position.

In connection with the Separation, Hewlett-Packard Company allocated to each of Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. the intellectual property assets relevant to their respective businesses. The terms of the Separation include cross-licenses and other arrangements to provide for certain ongoing use of intellectual property in the existing operations of both businesses. For example, through a joint brand holding structure, both Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. will retain the ability to make ongoing use of certain variations of the legacy Hewlett-Packard and HP branding, respectively. There is a risk that the joint brand holding structure may impair the enforcement of HP Inc.'sHP’s trademark rights against third parties that infringe them. Furthermore, as a result of this shared use of the legacy branding there is a risk that conduct or events adversely affecting the reputation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise could also adversely affect the reputation of HP Inc.HP. In addition, as a result of the allocation of intellectual property as part of the Separation, HP Inc. willwe no longer have ownership ofown intellectual property allocated to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and our resulting intellectual property ownership position could adversely affect our position and options relating to patent enforcement, patent licensing and cross-licensing, our ability to sell our products or services, our competitive position in the industry and our ability to enter new product markets.

Our business and financial performance could suffer if we do not manage the risks associated with our services businessbusinesses properly.

The risks that accompany our services businessbusinesses differ from those of our other businesses and includebusinesses. For example, the following:

Table of contents


products attached to services we provide, our retirement or lack of support for our services, our clients selecting alternative technologies to replace us, the prices for those services.cost of our services as compared to the cost of services offered by our competitors, general market conditions or other reasons. We may not be able to replace the revenue and earnings from any such lost clients or reductions in services. In addition,While our contracts may allow a client to terminate the contractservices agreements typically include penalties for convenience, and weearly termination, these penalties may not be able to fully recovercover our investments in such circumstances.

Thethese businesses in the event a client terminates a services agreement early or reduces the scope of the agreement. Our clients could also delay or terminate implementations or use of our services, or choose not to invest in additional services from us in the future. In addition, the pricing and other terms of some of our serviceservices agreements require us to make estimates and assumptions at the time we enter into these contracts that could differ from actual results. Any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of these engagements, including delays caused by factors outside our control, could make these agreements less profitable or unprofitable, which could have an adverse effect on the profitproduct margin of our services business.

Some of our service agreements require significant investment in As a result, we may not generate the early stages that is expected to be recovered through billings over the life of the agreement. These agreementsrevenues we may involve the development and deployment of new technologies. Varying degrees of performance risk exist in each agreement with these characteristics, and some or all elements of service delivery under these agreements are dependent upon successful completion of the development and deployment phases. Any failure to perform satisfactorily under these agreements may expose us to legal liability, result in the loss of customers and harm our reputation, which could harm the financial performance ofhave anticipated from our services business.

Table of Contents

at all.

Failure to comply with our customer contracts or government contracting regulations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our contracts with our customers may include unique and specialized performance requirements. In particular, our contracts with federal, state, provincial and local governmental customers are subject to various procurement regulations, contract provisions and other requirements relating to their formation, administration and performance. Any failure by us to comply with the specific provisions in our customer contracts or any violation of government contracting regulations could result in the imposition of various civil and criminal penalties, which may include termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments and, in the case of our government contracts, fines and suspension from future government contracting. Such failures could also cause reputational damage to our business. In addition, Hewlett-Packard Company has in the past been, and we may in the future be, subject to qui tam litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the government relating to our government contracts, which could include claims for treble damages. Further, any negative publicity related to our customer contracts or any proceedings surrounding them, regardless of its accuracy, may damage our business by affecting our ability to compete for new contracts. If our customer contracts are terminated, if we are suspended or disbarred from government work, or if our ability to compete for new contracts is adversely affected, our financial performance could suffer.

Hewlett-Packard Company's

Our stock price has historically fluctuated and our stock price may continue to fluctuate, which may make future prices of HP Inc.'sour stock difficult to predict.

Our stock price, like that of other technology companies, can be volatile. Some of the factors that could affect our stock price are:

speculation, coverage or sentiment in the media or the investment community about, or actual changes in, our business, strategic position, market share, organizational structure, operations, financial condition, financial reporting and results, effectiveness of cost-cutting efforts, value or liquidity of our investments, exposure to market volatility, prospects, business combination or investment transactions, future stock price performance, board of directors, executive team, our competitors or our industry in general;

the announcement of new, planned or contemplated products, services, technological innovations, acquisitions, divestitures or other significant transactions by us or our competitors;

quarterly increases or decreases in net revenue, gross margin, earnings or cash flows, changes in estimates by the investment community or our financial outlook and variations between actual and estimated financial results;

announcements of actual and anticipated financial results by our competitors and other companies in the IT industry;

Table of Contents

General or industry specificindustry-specific market conditions or stock market performance or domestic or international macroeconomic and geopolitical factors unrelated to our performance also may affect the price of our stock. For these reasons, investors should not rely on recent or historical trends to predict future stock prices, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Additional volatility in the price of our securities could result in the filing of securities class action litigation matters, which could result in substantial costs and the diversion of management time and resources.

Failure to maintain our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity, capital position, borrowing costs and access to capital markets.

Our credit risk is evaluated by the major independent rating agencies. Prior to the Separation, Fitch Ratings, Moody'sMoody’s Investor Service and Standard & Poor'sPoor’s Rating Services had downgraded Hewlett-Packard Company's ratings in the past.Company’s ratings. Past
Table of contents


downgrades have increased the cost of borrowing under our credit facilities, have reduced market capacity for our commercial paper, and may require the posting of additional collateral under some of our derivative contracts. We cannot assure yoube assured that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings, and any additional actual or anticipated changes or downgrades in our credit ratings, including any announcement that our ratings are under further review for a downgrade, may further impact us in a similar manner and may have a negative impact on our liquidity, capital position and access to capital markets.

We make estimates and assumptions in connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements, and any changes to those estimates and assumptions could adversely affect our results of operations.

In connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements, we use certain estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors. Our most critical accounting estimates are described in the section entitled "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” in Item 7 of this report. In addition, as discussed in Note 1614 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we make certain estimates, including decisions related to provisions for legal proceedings and other contingencies. While we believe that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances, they are subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could adversely affect our results of operations.

Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions, the adoption of new tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities could affect our financial performance.

We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and numerousvarious foreign jurisdictions. Our tax liabilities are affected by the amounts we charge in intercompany transactions for inventory, services, licenses, funding and other items. We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with ourthese intercompany charges, cross-jurisdictional transfer pricingtransactions or other matters, and may assess additional taxes or adjust taxable income on our tax returns as a result. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, we cannot assure you that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax expense and therefore could have a material impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows. In addition, our effective tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by changes to our operating structure, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities or changes in tax laws and the discovery of


Table of Contents

new information in the course of our tax return preparation process.laws. In particular, if circumstances change such that we are unable to indefinitely reinvest our foreign earnings outside the United States, future income tax expense and payments may differ significantly from historical amounts and could materially adversely affect our results of operations. The carrying value of deferredresults. In addition, various tax assets, which are predominantly inlegislation has been introduced or is being considered, including potential tax reform within the United States, is dependent on our ability to generate future taxable income in the United States. In addition, there are proposals for tax legislation that have been introduced or that are being considered that could have a significant adverse effect onsignificantly impact our tax rate, the carrying value of deferred tax assets, or our deferred tax liabilities. For example, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the “OECD”) has recently recommended changes to numerous long-standing international tax principles. If countries amend their tax laws to adopt certain parts of the OECD guidelines, this may increase tax uncertainty and may adversely impact our tax liabilities. Any of these changes could affect our financial performance.

In order to be successful, we must attract, retain, train, motivate, develop and transition key employees, and failure to do so could seriously harm us.

In order to be successful, we must attract, be able to hire, retain, train, motivate, develop and transition qualified executives and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, development, sales, marketing and IT support positions. Identifying, developing internally or hiring externally, training and retaining qualified executives, engineers skilled solutions providers in the IT support business and qualified sales representatives are critical to our future, and competition for experienced employees in the IT industry can be intense. In order to attract and retain executives and other key employees in a competitive marketplace, we must provide a competitive compensation package, including cash- and equity-based compensation. Our equity-based incentive awards may contain conditions relating to our stock price performance and our long-term financial performance that make the future value of those awards uncertain. If the anticipated value of such equity-based incentive awards does not materialize, if our equity-based compensation otherwise ceases to be viewed as a valuable benefit, if our total compensation package is not viewed as being competitive, or if we do not obtain the stockholder approval needed to continue granting equity-based incentive awards in the amounts we believe are necessary, our ability to attract, retain and motivate executives and key employees could be weakened. Our failure to successfully hire executives and key employees or the loss of any executives and key employees could have a significant impact on our operations. Further, changes in our management team may be disruptive to our business, and any failure to successfully transition and assimilate key new hires or promoted employees could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Table of contents


System security risks, data protection breaches, cyberattacks and systems integration issues could disrupt our internal operations or services provided to customers, and any such disruption could reduce our revenue, increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our stock price.

Experienced computer programmers and hackers, including state-sponsored organizations or nation-states, may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of third parties, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, ransomware and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products.products, or attempt to fraudulently induce our employees, customers, or others to disclose passwords or other sensitive information or unwittingly provide access to our systems or data. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third-parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including "bugs"“bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, including bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and other security vulnerabilities, could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, cessation of service and loss of existing or potential customers that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions.

Media or other reports of perceived security vulnerabilities in our network security, even if nothing has actually been attempted or occurred, could also adversely impact our brand and reputation and materially affect our business. While we have developed and implemented security measures and internal controls designed to protect against cyber and other security problems, such measures cannot provide absolute security and may not be successful in preventing future security breaches. In the past, we have experienced data security incidents resulting from unauthorized use of our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our operations; however, there is no assurance that such impacts will not be material in the future.

We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our business and our customers. Breaches of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data


Table of Contents

about us, our clients or our customers, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, could expose us, our customers or the individuals affected to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our brand and reputation or otherwise harm our business. We also could lose existing or potential customers or incur significant expenses in connection with our customers'customers’ system failures or any actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products and services. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of implementing further data protection measures could be significant.

Portions of our IT infrastructure also may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with systems integration or migration work that takes place from time to time. We may not be successful in implementing new systems and transitioning data, which could cause business disruptions and be more expensive, time-consuming, disruptive and resource intensive. Such disruptions could adversely impact our ability to fulfill orders and respond to customer requests and interrupt other processes. Delayed sales, lower margins or lost customers resulting from these disruptions could reduce our revenue, increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our stock price.

Terrorist acts, conflicts, wars and geopolitical uncertainties may seriously harm our business and revenue, costs and expenses and financial condition and stock price.

Terrorist acts, conflicts or wars (wherever located around the world) may cause damage or disruption to our business, our employees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers or adversely affect our ability to manage logistics, operate our transportation and communication systems or conduct certain other critical business operations. The potential for future attacks, the national and international responses to attacks or perceived threats to national security, and other actual or potential conflicts or wars have created many economic and political uncertainties. In addition, as a major multinational company with headquarters and significant operations located in the United States, actions against or by the United States may impact our business or employees. Although it is impossible to predict the occurrences or consequences of any such events, if they occur, they could result in a decrease in demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible to provide services or deliver products to our customers or to receive components from our suppliers, create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain and result in the need to impose employee travel restrictions. We are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts, conflicts and wars.

Table of contents


Our business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that could result in costs or other sanctions that adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations. For example, we are subject to laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites, the content of our products and the recycling, treatment and disposal of our products, including batteries. In particular, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of our products, their safe use, the energy consumption associated with those products, climate change laws and regulations, and product take-back legislation. If we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if our products become non-compliant with environmental laws, we could incur substantial costs or face other sanctions, which may include restrictions on our products entering certain jurisdictions. Our potential exposure includes fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage, personal injury claims and clean-up costs. Further, liability under some environmental laws relating to contaminated sites can be imposed


Table of Contents

retroactively, on a joint and several basis, and without any finding of noncompliance or fault. The amount and timing of costs to comply with environmental laws are difficult to predict.

Some anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

We have provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws each of which could have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an acquisition of HP Inc. deemed undesirable by our Board of Directors. These include provisions:

authorizing blank check preferred stock, which we could issue with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock;

limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers;

specifying that our stockholders may take action only at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and otherwise in accordance with our bylaws and limiting the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings;

requiring advance notice of proposals by our stockholders for business to be conducted at stockholder meetings and for nominations of candidates for election to our Board of Directors; and

controlling the procedures for conduct of our Board of Directors and stockholder meetings and election, appointment and removal of our directors.

These provisions, alone or together, could deter or delay hostile takeovers, proxy contests and changes in control or our management. As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some stockholders from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of substantially all of our outstanding common stock.

Any provision of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control of HP Inc. could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our stock and also could affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our stock.

Risks Related to the Separation

The separation of Hewlett-Packard Company into two independent publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies is subject to various risks and uncertainties and may not achieve some or all of the anticipated benefits.

On November 1, 2015, we completed the Separation of our enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses from itsour personal systems and printing businesses. The process of completing the Separation has involved significant costs and expenses. Uncertainty related to the Separation may lead customers and other parties with which we currently do business or may do business in the future to terminate or attempt to negotiate changes in our existing business relationships, or cause them to consider entering into business relationships with parties other than us. These disruptions could have a material and adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may not realize some or all of the anticipated strategic, financial, operational, marketing or other benefits from the separation.Separation. As an independent publicly-tradedpublicly traded company we are a smaller, less diversified company with a narrower business focus and may be more vulnerable to changing market conditions, which could materially and adversely affect itsour business, financial condition and results of operations.

We continue to review our acquisitions, dispositions, and other transactions, including those related to the Separation, in light of the economic and legislative environment.

Table of Contentscontents



The Separation could result in substantial tax liability.

We obtained an opinion of outside counsel that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Separation qualified, for both the company and our stockholders, as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Sections 368(d)(1)(D) and 355 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In addition, we obtained a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS"“IRS”) and opinions of outside counsel regarding certain matters impacting the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Separation for the company and certain related transactions as transactions that are generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The opinions of outside counsel and the IRS private letter ruling were based, among other things, on various factual assumptions we have authorized and representations we have made to outside counsel and the IRS. If any of these assumptions or representations are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, reliance on the opinions and IRS private letter ruling may be affected. An opinion of outside counsel represents their legal judgementjudgment but is not binding on the IRS or any court. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions reflected in the opinions or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we incurred certain tax costs in connection with the Separation, including non-U.S. tax expenses resulting from the Separation in multiple non-U.S. jurisdictions that do not legally provide for tax-free Separation, which may be material. If the Separation or certain internal transactions undertaken in anticipation of the Separation are determined to be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we and/or our stockholders that are subject to U.S. federal income tax and/or Hewlett Packard Enterprise could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities.

We or Hewlett Packard Enterprise or HP Inc. may fail to perform under the transaction agreements executed as part of the Separation.

In connection with the Separation, we and Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. entered into several agreements, including among others a transition services agreement, a separation and distribution agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, a real estate matters agreement and a commercial agreement and an IT service agreement. The transition services agreement provides for the performance of certain services by each company for the benefit of the other for a transition period after the Separation. The separation and distribution agreement, tax matters agreement, employee matters agreement and real estate matters agreement determine the allocation of assets and liabilities between the companies following the Separation for those respective areas and include any necessary indemnifications related to liabilities and obligations. The commercial agreement establishes a bilateral relationship between Hewlett Packard Enterprise has spun off or separated certain of its businesses since the Separation, and us forsome of its obligations under these and other agreements have transferred to the purchase and sale of commercially available products and services for internal use, incorporation and bundling in OEM products and services, resale to customers and use in the provision of managed services to customers, as well as joint customer pursuits and joint development activities. The IT service agreement provides for the performance by one of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's subsidiaries of certain application development and maintenance and IT infrastructure services for us.successor entities. We will rely on Hewlett Packard Enterprise or its successor entities to satisfy itstheir performance and payment obligations under these agreements. If Hewlett Packard Enterprise isor its successor entities has separated are unable to satisfy itstheir obligations under these agreements, we could incur operational difficulties or losses that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Properties.

As of October 31, 2015,2017, we owned or leased approximately 7020.3 million square feet of space worldwide, a summary of which is provided below.

 
 Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2015
 
 
 Owned Leased Total 
 
 (square feet in millions)
 

Administration and support

  11  23  34 

(Percentage)

  32% 68% 100%

Core data centers, manufacturing plants, research and development facilities and warehouse operations

  14  16  30 

(Percentage)

  47% 53% 100%

Total(1)

  25  39  64 

(Percentage)

  39% 61% 100%

(1)
Excludes 6 million square feet of vacated space, of which 2 million square feet is leased to third parties.

        In connection with the Separation, as of November 1, 2015, we transferred a total of approximately 51 million square feet of space worldwide to Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Of that, Hewlett Packard Enterprise owned approximately 21 million square feet and leased approximately 30 million square feet of space.

 Fiscal year ended October 31, 2017
 Owned
Leased
Total
 (square feet in millions)
Administration and support3.6

5.2

8.8
(Percentage)40%
60%
100%
Core data centers, manufacturing plants, research and development facilities and warehouse operations2.0

6.0

8.0
(Percentage)25%
75%
100%
Total(1)
5.6

11.2

16.8
(Percentage)33%
67%
100%
(1)
Excludes 3.5 million square feet of vacated space, of which 1.9 million square feet is leased to third parties.
We believe that our existing properties are in good condition and are suitable for the conduct of our business. Because of the interrelationEach of our segments a majority of our segments use substantially allPersonal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments, uses each of the properties at least in part, and we retain the flexibility to use each of the properties in whole or in part for each of the segments.

Principal Executive Offices



Our principal executive offices, including our global headquarters, are located at 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.

States.

Headquarters of Geographic Operations

The locations of our geographic headquarters are as follows:

Americas
Europe, Middle East, Africa
Asia Pacific
Houston,Palo Alto, United States
Mississauga, Canada
 Geneva, Switzerland Singapore
Tokyo, Japan

Table of Contents

Product Development Services and Manufacturing

The locations of our major product development, manufacturing, data centers and HP Labs facilities are as follows:

Americas

Brazil—Sao Paulo

Canada—Markham, Mississauga

Puerto Rico—Aguadilla

United StatesAlpharetta, Andover, Auburn Hills, Austin, Cincinnati, Boise, Charlotte, Colorado Springs, Corvallis, Des Moines, Fort Collins, Hockley, Houston, Indianapolis, Nashville, Palo Alto, Plano, Rancho Cordova, Roseville, San Diego, Sandston, Suwanee, TulsaBoise, Vancouver
 
Europe, Middle East, Africa

France—Grenoble

Ireland—Dublin

Israel—Kiryat-Gat, Nes Ziona,Rehovot, Netanya

Germany—Frankfurt

Spain—Barcelona

United Kingdom—Billingham, Erskine, Norwich, Sunderland

Asia Pacific
China—
Shanghai
 
Malaysia—
India—PenangBangalore, Udham Singh Nagar
 
Japan—Tokyo

Singapore—Singapore

Taiwan—Taipei

 

Technology office (HP Labs)
HP Labs

Israel—Haifa

United Kingdom—Bristol

  
United States—Palo Alto

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.

Information with respect to this item may be found in Note 1614, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.




PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Information regarding the market prices of HP common stock and the markets for that stock may be found in the "Quarterly Summary"“Quarterly Summary” in Item 8 and on the cover page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, respectively, which are incorporated herein by reference. We have declared and paid cash dividends each fiscal year since 1965. Dividends declared and paid per share by fiscal quarter in 20152017 and 20142016 were as follows:


 2015 2014 2017 2016

 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1

Dividends declared

  $0.35  $0.32  $0.32  $0.29 
 $0.26
 
 $0.27
 
 $0.25
 
 $0.25

Dividends paid

 $0.18 $0.18 $0.16 $0.16 $0.16 $0.16 $0.15 $0.15 $0.13
 $0.13
 $0.14
 $0.13
 $0.12
 $0.12
 $0.12
 $0.12

Additional information concerning dividends may be found in "Selected“Selected Financial Data"Data” in Item 6 and Note 1412, “Stockholders’ Deficit” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.

As of November 30, 2015,2017, there were approximately 71,91063,697 stockholders of record.

        In connection with the Separation, on November 1, 2015, we completed the distribution of the outstanding common stock of Hewlett Packard Enterprise to our stockholders as of the close of business on October 21, 2015, the record date for the distribution. Our stockholders received one share of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock for every one share of our common stock held at the close of business on the record date. We distributed a total of approximately 1.8 billion shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock to our stockholders.


Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

        On October 9, 2015, Hewlett Packard Enterprise completed the offering of senior unsecured notes in aggregate principal amount of $14.6 billion (the "Notes") through private placement to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and to certain non-U.S. persons in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes issued by Hewlett Packard Enterprise have not been registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws.

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities in fiscal 2015.

year 2017.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Fourth Quarter of Fiscal 2015
 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 Average
Price Paid
per Share
 Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased under the
Plans or Programs
 
 
 In thousands, except per share amounts
 

Month #1
(August 2015)

  3,429 $28.90  3,429 $2,235,197 

Month #2
(September 2015)

  
3,641
 
$

27.11
  
3,641
 
$

2,136,497
 

Month #3
(October 2015)

  
3,732
 
$

27.70
  
3,732
 
$

2,033,098
 

Total

  
10,802
 
$

27.88
  
10,802
    
 Total Number of Shares Purchased 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
 In thousands, except per share amounts
Period      
August 20172,443
 $19.10
2,443
 $2,914,759
September 20175,871
 $19.50
5,871
 $2,800,269
October 201716,110
 $21.09
16,110
 $2,460,466
Total24,424
 
24,424
  

TableOn October 10, 2016, the Board authorized $3.0 billion for future repurchases of Contents

        On July 21, 2011, HP's BoardHP’s outstanding shares of Directors authorized a $10.0 billion share repurchase program. HP may choose to repurchase shares when sufficient liquidity exists and the shares are trading at a discount relative to estimated intrinsic value.common stock. This program, which does not have a specific expiration date, authorizes repurchases in the open market or in private transactions. HP intends to use repurchases from time to time to offset the dilution created by shares issued under employee stock plans and to repurchase shares opportunistically. All share repurchases settled in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015year 2017 were open market transactions. As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP had approximately $2.5 billion remaining authorizationunder repurchase authorization.

Table of $2.0 billion for future share repurchases.

contents



Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return

The graph below shows the cumulative total stockholder return assuming the investment of $100 at the market close on October 31, 20102012 (and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter) in each of HP common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the S&P Information Technology Index. The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not indicative of, or intended to forecast, future performance of our common stock.


 10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 

Hewlett-Packard Company

 100.00 64.10 34.14 61.77 92.71 71.13 
10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/16 10/17
HP Inc.(1)
$100.00
 $180.94
 $271.55
 $208.35
 $256.47
 $393.13

S&P 500 Index

 100.00 108.08 124.51 158.33 185.66 195.3 $100.00
 $127.17
 $149.11
 $156.86
 $163.91
 $202.64

S&P Information Technology Index

 100.00 108.76 120.42 144.39 181.5 201.82 $100.00
 $119.90
 $150.71
 $167.58
 $185.72
 $258.08
(1) Historical stock prices of HP Inc. prior to the Separation, which occurred on November 1, 2015, have been adjusted to reflect the impact of the Separation. The adjustment was established using the conversion ratio based on the market value of stock on the Separation close at October 31, 2015.

Table of Contentscontents




ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.

The information set forth below includes the results of Hewlett Packard Enterprise which separated from HP on November 1, 2015 and is not annecessarily indicative of results of future continuing operations. The information set forth belowoperations and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, "Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,"Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, "Financial“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,"Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are incorporated herein by reference, in order to understand further the factors that may affect the comparability of the financial data presented below.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Selected Financial Data

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 
 
 In millions, except per share amounts
 

Net revenue

 $103,355 $111,454 $112,298 $120,357 $127,245 

Earnings (loss) from operations(1)

 $5,471 $7,185 $7,131 $(11,057)$9,677 

Net earnings (loss)(1)

 $4,554 $5,013 $5,113 $(12,650)$7,074 

Net earnings (loss) per share

                

Basic

 $2.51 $2.66 $2.64 $(6.41)$3.38 

Diluted

 $2.48 $2.62 $2.62 $(6.41)$3.32 

Cash dividends declared per share

 $0.67 $0.61 $0.55 $0.50 $0.40 

At year-end:

                

Total assets(2)

 $106,882 $103,206 $105,676 $108,768 $129,517 

Long-term debt

 $21,780 $16,039 $16,608 $21,789 $22,551 

Total debt(3)

 $24,665 $19,525 $22,587 $28,436 $30,634 

(1)
Earnings (loss) from operations and net earnings (loss) include the following items:

 
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 
 
 In millions
 

Amortization of intangible assets

 $931 $1,000 $1,373 $1,784 $1,607 

Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets

        18,035  885 

Wind down of webOS device business

        (36) 755 

Wind down of non-strategic businesses

        108   

Restructuring charges

  1,017  1,619  990  2,266  645 

Separation costs

  1,259         

Defined benefit plan settlement charges

  168         

Impairment of data center assets

  136         

Acquisition and other related charges

  90  11  22  45  182 

Total charges before taxes

 $3,601 $2,630 $2,385 $22,202 $4,074 

Total charges, net of taxes

 $2,737 $2,132 $1,825 $20,685 $3,130 
(2)
Total assets decreased in fiscal 2012 due primarily to goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges associated with the Autonomy reporting unit within the Software segment, a goodwill impairment charge associated with the ES segment and an intangible asset impairment charge associated with the "Compaq" trade name within the Personal Systems segment.

(3)
Total debt increased in fiscal 2015 due primarily to the Separation and business acquisitions. In fiscal 2014 and 2013, total debt decreased due to maturities.
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 In millions, except per share amounts
Net revenue$52,056
 $48,238
 $51,463
 $56,651
 $55,273
Earnings from continuing operations(1) 
$3,519
 $3,549
 $3,920
 $4,256
 $3,516
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations net of taxes$
 $(170) $836
 $2,089
 $2,653
Net earnings(1) 
$2,526
 $2,496
 $4,554
 $5,013
 $5,113
Net earnings per share: 
  
  
  
  
Basic 
  
  
  
  
Continuing operations$1.50
 $1.54
 $2.05
 $1.55
 $1.27
Discontinued operations
 (0.10) 0.46
 1.11
 1.37
Total basic net earnings per share$1.50
 $1.44
 $2.51
 $2.66
 $2.64
Diluted 
  
  
  
  
Continuing operations$1.48
 $1.53
 $2.02
 $1.53
 $1.26
Discontinued operations
 (0.10) 0.46
 1.09
 1.36
Total diluted net earnings per share$1.48
 $1.43
 $2.48
 $2.62
 $2.62



 

 

 

 

Cash dividends declared per share$0.53
 $0.50
 $0.67
 $0.61
 $0.55
At year-end: 
  
  
  
  
Total assets(2)(4)
$32,913
 $28,987
 $106,853
 $103,158
 $105,629
Long-term debt(3)(4)
$6,747
 $6,735
 $6,648
 $15,515
 $15,949
Total debt(3)(4) 
$7,819
 $6,813
 $8,842
 $18,109
 $20,884

(1)
Earnings from continuing operations and net earnings include the following items:

 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 In millions
Restructuring and other charges$362
 $205
 $63
 $176
 $168
Acquisition-related charges125
 7
 1
 
 
Amortization of intangible assets1
 16
 102
 129
 198
Defined benefit plan settlement charges (credits)5

179

(57)



Total charges before taxes$493

$407

$109

$305

$366
Total charges, net of taxes$367

$293

$113

$238

$260

(2)
Total assets, for all periods prior to fiscal year 2016, include the total assets of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. For further information on discontinued operations, see Note 17, “Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


(3)
The decrease in Long-term debt and Total debt in fiscal year 2015 was due to the early extinguishment of debt as a result of the Separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. For further information on HP Inc. separation transaction, see “HP Inc. Separation Transaction” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)
Effective November 1, 2016, HP adopted ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which amended the presentation of debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liability re-classed from other non-current assets. The change has been adopted including the prior periods for consistency with the current period. For further information, see Note 11, “Borrowings” in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations


ITEM 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("(“MD&A"&A”) is organized as follows:

HP Inc. Separation Transaction.A discussion of the separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany, HP Inc.’s former enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses.


Overview.A discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company to provide context for the remainder of this MD&A. The overview analysis compares fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.A discussion of accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results.


Results of Operations. An analysis of our continuing financial results comparing fiscal 2015year 2017 to fiscal 2014year 2016 and fiscal 2014year 2016 to fiscal 2013.year 2015. A discussion of the results of continuing operations at the consolidated level is followed by a more detailed discussion of the results of operations by segment.


Liquidity and Capital Resources.An analysis of changes in our cash flows and a discussion of our liquidity and continuing financial condition and liquidity.condition.


Contractual and Other Obligations.An overview of contractual obligations, retirement and post-retirement benefit plan funding, restructuringcontributions, cost-saving plans, separation costs, uncertain tax positions and off-balance sheet arrangements.arrangements of our continuing operations.

        We intend the

The discussion of our financial condition and results of our continuing operations that follows to provideprovides information that will assist the reader in understanding our Consolidated Financial Statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect our Consolidated Financial Statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.


HP Inc. Separation Transaction

On November 1, 2015, (the "Distribution Date"), we completed the separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“Hewlett Packard Enterprise”), Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany’s former enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses (the "Separation"“Separation”). In connection with the Separation, Hewlett-Packard Company changed its name to HP Inc.

        On November 1, 2015, each of our stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 21, 2015 (the "Record Date" (“HP”) received one share of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock for every one share of our common stock held as of the Record Date. We distributed a total of approximately 1.8 billion shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock to our stockholders.

        Hewlett Packard Enterprise is now an independent public company trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "HPE". After the Separation, we do not beneficially own any shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        The process of completing the Separation was highly complex and involved significant costs and expenses. Accordingly, we incurred separation costs and foreign tax expenses associated with separating into two companies. In fiscal 2015, we recorded nonrecurring separation costs and net foreign tax expenses of $1.6 billion, which were primarily related to third-party consulting, contractor fees and other incremental costs directly associated with the separation process. We expect total separation charges and net foreign tax expenses to be approximately $180 million in fiscal 2016. Additionally, the separation into two independent companies is expected to result in total dis-synergies of approximately $400 million to $450 million annually, which costs are primarily associated with corporate functions such as finance, legal, IT, real estate and human resources. Such dis-synergies are expected to be divided approximately equally between HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

        We recorded a deferred tax asset on these costs and expenses as they were incurred through fiscal 2015. We expect a portion of these deferred tax assets associated with separation costs and expenses will be eliminated, given that some will be non-deductible, at the time the Separation is executed. Furthermore, we concluded on the legal form of the Separation and in May 2015 announced that Hewlett Packard Enterprise will be the spinnee company in the United States ("U.S."). Accordingly, we implemented certain internal reorganizations of, and transactions among, our wholly-owned subsidiaries and operating activities in preparation for the legal form of separation. As a result, we recognized gross incremental foreign tax expenses related to the separation of foreign legal entities of approximately $300 million and foreign tax credits of approximately $100 million in fiscal 2015 with additional tax credit amounts expected over several years. As of October 31, 2015, we also expect separation-related capital expenditures of approximately $30 million in fiscal 2016.

In connection with the Separation, we and Hewlett Packard Enterprise have entered into a separation and distribution agreement as well as various other agreements that provide a framework for the relationships between the partiesHP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise going forward, including among others a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, a transition service agreement, a real estate matters agreement and a master commercial agreementagreement.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and an information technology service agreement. In the fourth quarterAnalysis of fiscal 2015, we transferred substantially all
Financial Condition and Results of the assets, liabilities and operations of enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses to Hewlett Packard Enterprise in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2015.

        The historical results of operations and the financial position of Hewlett Packard EnterpriseOperations (Continued)




OVERVIEW
 We are included in the consolidated financial statements of HP Inc. for each of the fiscal years included in this report and will be reported as discontinued operations beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Beginning November 1, 2015, we no longer consolidate Hewlett Packard Enterprise within our financial results or reflect the financial results of Hewlett Packard Enterprise within our continuing results of operations.

OVERVIEW

        As of October 31, 2015, we were a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, software, solutions, and servicesservices. We sell to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses ("SMBs"(“SMBs”) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health, and education sectors. Our offerings span the following:


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        As of October 31, 2015, we had sevenWe have three segments for financial reporting purposes: Personal Systems, Printing the Enterprise Group ("EG"), Enterprise Services ("ES"), Software, HP Financial Services ("HPFS") and Corporate Investments. Effective November 1, 2015, we report three segments as part of continuing operations:The Personal Systems Printingsegment offers Commercial and Corporate Investments.

        The following provides an overview of our key financial metrics by segment for fiscal 2015:

 
  
 Printing and Personal
Systems Group
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 HP
Consolidated
 Personal
Systems
 Printing Total Enterprise
Group
 Enterprise
Services
 Software HPFS Corporate
Investments(3)
 
 
 Dollars in millions, except per share amounts
  
 

Net revenue(1)

 $103,355 $31,469 $21,232 $52,701 $27,907 $19,806 $3,458 $3,216 $27 

Year-over-year change %

  (7.3)% (8.3)% (8.5)% (8.4)% 0.7% (11.6)% (6.6)% (8.1)% (91.1)%

Earnings from operations(2)

 $5,471 $1,064 $3,865 $4,929 $3,981 $1,051 $760 $349 $(565)

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

  5.3% 3.4% 18.2% 9.4% 14.3% 5.3% 22.0% 10.9% NM 

Year-over-year change percentage points

  (1.1)pts (0.3)pts 0.0pts (0.2)pts (0.1)pts 1.7pts (0.4)pts (0.2)pts NM 

(1)
HP consolidated net revenue excludes intersegment net revenueConsumer personal computers (“PCs”), Workstations, thin clients, Commercial tablets and other.

(2)
Segment earnings from operations exclude corporate and unallocated costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, acquisitionmobility devices, retail point-of-sale systems, displays and other related charges, separation costs, defined benefit plan settlement chargesaccessories, software, support and impairment of data center assets.

(3)
"NM" represents not meaningful.

services for the commercial and consumer markets. The Printing segment provides Consumer and Commercial printer hardware, Supplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Corporate Investments include HP consolidated net revenue declined 7.3% (decreased 2.1% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The leading contributors to the net revenue decline were unfavorable currency impacts across all major segments, key account runoffLabs and soft demand in Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing ("ITO") in ES, lower desktop sales incertain business incubation projects.

In Personal Systems, our strategic focus is on profitable growth through hyper market segmentation with respect to enhanced innovation in multi-operating systems, multi-architecture, geography, customer segments and lower salesother key attributes. Additionally, we are investing in premium and mobility form factors such as convertible notebooks, detachable notebooks and mobility devices in order to meet customer preference for mobile, thinner and lighter devices. The beginning of printersa market shift to contractual solutions includes an increased focus on Device as a Service. We believe that we are well positioned due to our competitive product lineup.
In Printing, our strategic focus is on business printing, a shift to contractual solutions and supplies. Partially offsetting these declines was growth within the EG segment from sales of ISS servers. Gross margin was 24.0% ($24.8 billion) and 23.9% ($26.6 billion) for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The 0.1 percentage point increase in gross margin was due primarily to service delivery efficiencies and improvements in underperforming contracts in ES. Partially offsetting the gross margin increase was the impact from a higher mix of ISS products in EG, competitive pricing pressures in Printing and the impact from the sale of intellectual property ("IP")Graphics, as well as expanding our footprint in the prior-year period.3D printing marketplace. Business printing includes delivering solutions to SMBs and enterprise customers, such as multi-function and PageWide printers, including our JetIntelligence lineup of LaserJet printers. The shift to contractual solutions includes an increased focus on Managed Print Services and Instant Ink, which presents strong after-market supplies opportunities. In the Graphics space, we are focused on innovations such as our Indigo and Latex product offerings. We plan to continue to focus on shifting the mix in the installed base to higher value units and expanding our innovative Ink, Laser, Graphics and 3D printing programs. We continue to experience gross margin pressures resulting from a competitive pricing environment acrossexecute on our hardware portfolio. HP's operating margin decreased by 1.1 percentage pointskey initiatives of focusing on high-value products targeted at high usage categories and introducing new revenue delivery models. Our focus is on placing higher value printer units which offer strong annuity of toner and ink, the design and deployment of A3 products and solutions, accelerating growth in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 due primarily to separation costs, pension plan settlement charges, data center impairmentsGraphic solutions and the impact from the sale of IP in the prior-year period. Partially offsetting these

3D printing.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

declines was the gross margin increase, lower selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses and lower restructuring charges.

        As of October 31, 2015, cash and cash equivalents and short- and long-term investments were $17.7 billion, representing an increase of approximately $2.2 billion from the October 31, 2014 balance of $15.5 billion. The increase in cash and cash equivalents and short- and long-term investments in fiscal 2015 was primarily due to the following factors: cash received from operating cash flows of $6.5 billion and cash received for net issuances and repayments of debt of $5.0 billion; partially offset by investments in property, plant and equipment and business acquisitions net of divestitures of $3.2 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, cash utilization for share repurchases of common stock of $2.9 billion and dividend payments to stockholders of $1.2 billion.

We continue to experience challenges that are representative of trends and uncertainties that may affect our business and results of operations. One set of challenges relates to dynamic and accelerating market trends, such as the decline in theflat PC market. Certain of our legacy hardware businesses face challenges as customers migrate to cloud-based offeringsdevice and reduce their purchases of hardware products.home printing markets. A second set of challenges relates to changes in the competitive landscape. Our majorprimary competitors are expanding their product and service offerings with integrated products and solutions, our business-specific competitors are exerting increased competitive pressure in targeted areas and are entering new markets, our emerging competitors are introducing new technologies and business models, and our alliance partners in some businesses are increasingly becoming our competitors in others. A third set of challenges relates to business model changes and our go-to-market execution.

        The macroeconomic weakness we have experienced has moderated in some geographic regions but remains an overall challenge. A discussion of some of these challenges at the segment level is set forth below.

In Personal Systems, we are witnessing soft demandface challenges with continued increases in the Personal Computer ("PC") market as customers hold onto their PCs longer, thereby extending PC refresh cycles. Demand for PCs is being impacted by weaker macroeconomic conditions and currency devaluationscommodity costs, especially in certain Asian and European markets. Additionally, industry wide, PC channels in some regions are working through excess channel inventory, which is impacting sell in. As such, we see continued market headwinds for the next several quarters. However, we are optimistic and see opportunity in the market long term given our strength in Commercialmemory, and the launchuncertainty of Windows 10, combined with Intel's Skylake processor family transition, which may represent a catalyst for demand through introduction of breakthrough form factors. In Personal Systems, we are maintaining our strategic focus on profitable growth through improved market segmentation with respectthe PC market’s ability to enhanced innovation in multi-operating systems, multi-architecture, geography, customer segments and other key attributes. Additionally, HP is investing significantly in premium and mobility form factors such as convertible notebooks, detachable notebooks, and commercial tablets in order to meet customer preference for mobile, thinner and lighter devices.

absorb price increases driven by higher commodity costs.
In Printing, we are experiencing the impactseeing signs of the growth in mobility andstabilization of demand challenges in consumer and commercial markets. Wemarkets, but are alsostill experiencing an overall competitive pricing environmentenvironment. We obtained a number of components from single sources due to aggressive pricingtechnology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. For instance, we source majority of our A4 and a portion of A3 portfolio of laser printer engines and laser toner cartridges from Canon. Any decision by either party to not renew our Japanese competitors, givenagreement with Canon or to limit or reduce the weaknessscope of the Japanese yen. To be successfulagreement could adversely affect our net revenue from LaserJet products; however, we have a long-standing business relationship with Canon and anticipate renewal of this agreement.
Our business and financial performance also depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions. Accordingly, we face global macroeconomic challenges such as the June 23, 2016 referendum by British voters to exit the European Union (commonly known as “Brexit”), uncertainty in addressingthe markets and weaker macroeconomic conditions. The impact of these and other global macroeconomic challenges we need to continue to execute on our key initiatives of focusing on products targetedbusiness cannot be known at high usage categories and introducing new revenue delivery models to consumer customers. In the consumer market, our Ink in the Office products are driving unit volume due to our OfficeJet Pro product lines. The Ink in the Office

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

time.

To address these challenges, we continue to pursue innovation with a view towards developing new products and services aligned with generating market demand industry trends and meeting the needs of our customers and partners. In addition, we need to continue to improve our operations, with a particular focus on enhancing our end-to-end processes and efficiencies. We also need to continue to optimize our sales coverage models, align our sales incentives with our strategic goals, improve channel execution, strengthen our capabilities in our areas of strategic focus, and develop and capitalize on market opportunities.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)




We typically experience higher net revenues in our first and fourth quarters compared to other quarters in our fiscal year due in part to seasonal holiday demand. Historical seasonal patterns should not be considered reliable indicators of our future net revenues or financial performance.
For a further discussion of trends, uncertainties and other factors that could impact our continuing operating results, see the section entitled "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” in Item 1A which is incorporated herein by reference.

in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

General

The Consolidated Financial Statements of HP are prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"(“GAAP”), which require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying amount of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of HP'sHP’s Board of Directors. Management believes that the accounting estimates employed and the resulting amounts are reasonable; however, actual results may differ from these estimates. Making estimates and judgments about future events is inherently unpredictable and is subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1, “Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably possible could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect the significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services are rendered, the sales price or fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, as well as when other revenue recognition principles are met, including industry-specific revenue recognition guidance.

We enter into contracts to sell our products and services, and while many of our sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions, there are agreements we enter into which contain non-standard terms and conditions. Further, many of our arrangements include multiple elements. As a result, significant contract interpretation may be required to determine the appropriate accounting, including the identification of deliverables considered to be separate units of accounting, the allocation of the transaction price among elements in the arrangement and the timing of revenue recognition for each of those elements.

We recognize revenue for delivered elements as separate units of accounting when the delivered elements have standalone value to the customer. For elements with no standalone value, we recognize revenue consistent with the pattern of the undelivered elements.delivery of the final deliverable. If the arrangement includes a customer-negotiated refund or return right or other contingency relative to the delivered items and the delivery and performance of the undelivered items is considered probable and substantially within our control, the delivered element constitutes a separate unit of accounting. In arrangements with


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

combined units of accounting, changes in the allocation of the transaction price among elements may impact the timing of revenue recognition for the contract but will not change the total revenue recognized for the contract.

We establish the selling prices used for each deliverable based on vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE"(“VSOE”) of selling price, if available, third-party evidence ("TPE"(“TPE”), if VSOE of selling price is not available, or estimated selling price ("ESP"(“ESP”), if neither VSOE of selling price nor TPE is available. We establish VSOE of selling price using the price charged for a deliverable when sold separately and, in rare instances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. We

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



evaluate TPE of selling price is established by evaluatingreviewing largely similar and interchangeable competitor products or services in standalone sales to similarly situated customers. ESP is established based on management'smanagement’s judgment considering internal factors such as margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product life cycle. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies and industry technology life cycles. We may modify or develop new go-to-market practices in the future, which may result in changes in selling prices, impacting both VSOE of selling price and ESP. In most arrangements with multiple elements, the transaction price is allocated to the individual units of accounting at inception of the arrangement based on their relative selling price. However, the aforementioned factors may result in a different allocation of the transaction price to deliverables in multiple element arrangements entered into in future periods. This may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for identical arrangements executed in future periods, but will not change the total revenue recognized for any given arrangement.

We reduce revenue for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings, including price protection, rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns. Future market conditions and product transitions may require us to take actions to increase customer incentive offerings, possibly resulting in an incremental reduction of revenue at the time the incentive is offered. For certain incentive programs, we estimate the number of customers expected to redeem the incentive based on historical experience and the specific terms and conditions of the incentive.

For hardware products, we recognize revenue generated from direct sales to end customers and indirect sales to channel partners (including resellers, distributors and value-added solution providers) when the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. For indirect sales to channel partners, we recognize revenue at the time of delivery when the channel partner has economic substance apart from HP and HP has completed its obligations related to the sale.

        For the various software products we sell (e.g., big data analytics and applications, application delivery management, enterprise security and IT Operations Management), we assess whether the software products were sold on a standalone basis or with hardware products. If the software sold with a hardware product is not essential to the functionality of the hardware product and is more-than-incidental, we treat it as a software deliverable.

        We recognize revenue from the sale of perpetual software licenses at inception of the license term, assuming all revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Term-based software license revenue is generally recognized ratably over the term of the license. We use the residual method to allocate revenue to software licenses at inception of the arrangement when VSOE of fair value for all undelivered elements, such as post-contract customer support, exists and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Revenue from maintenance and unspecified upgrades or updates provided


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

on a when-and-if-available basis is recognized ratably over the period during which such items are delivered.

        For hosting or SaaS arrangements, we recognize revenue as the service is delivered, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contractual period of performance. In hosting arrangements, we consider the rights provided to the customer (e.g. whether the customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty and the feasibility of the customer to operate or contract with another vendor to operate the software) in determining whether the arrangement includes the sale of a software license. In hosting arrangements where software licenses are sold, license revenue is generally recognized according to whether perpetual or term licenses are sold, when all other revenue recognition criteria are satisfied.

We recognize revenue from fixed-price support or maintenance contracts including extended warranty contracts and software post-contract customer support agreements, ratably over the contract period. For certain fixed-price contracts, such as consulting arrangements, we recognize revenue as work progresses using a proportional performance method. We estimate the total expected labor costs in order to determine the amount of revenue earned to date. We apply a proportional performance method because reasonably dependable estimates of the labor costs applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. On fixed-price contracts for design and build projects (to design, develop and construct software infrastructure and systems), we recognize revenue as work progresses using the percentage-of-completion method. We use the cost-to-cost method to measure progress toward completion as determined by the percentage of costs incurred to date compared to the total estimated costs of the project. Total project costs are subject to revision throughout the life of a fixed-price contract. Provisions for estimated losses on fixed-price contracts are recognized in the period when such losses become known and are recorded as a component of cost of sales. In circumstances when reasonable and reliable cost estimates for a project cannot be made we recognize revenue using the completed contract method.

        Outsourcing services revenue is generally recognized in the period when the service is provided and the amount earned is not contingent on the occurrence of any future event. We recognize revenue using an objective measure of output for per unit-priced contracts. Revenue for fixed-price outsourcing contracts with periodic billings is recognized on a straight-line basis if the service is provided evenly over the contract term. Provisions for estimated losses on outsourcing arrangements are recognized in the period when such losses become probable and estimable and are recorded as a component of cost of sales.

Warranty

We accrue the estimated cost of product warranties at the time we recognize revenue. We evaluate our warranty obligations on a product group basis. Our standard product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for a specified period of time. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers, we base our estimated warranty obligation on contractual warranty terms, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, current period product shipments and ongoing product failure rates, as well as specific product class failure outside of our baseline experience. Warranty terms generally range from 90 days to three years for parts, labor and labor,onsite services, depending upon the product. Over the last three fiscal years, the annual warranty expense and actual warranty costs have averaged approximately 2.5%2.0% and 2.7%2.3% of annual net product revenue, respectively.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion

Restructuring and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Restructuring

Other Charges

We have engaged in restructuring actions which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction and enhanced early retirement programs, fair value of assets made redundant or obsolete, and the fair value of lease cancellation and other exit costs. We accrue for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The rates used in determining severance accruals are based on existing plans, historical experiences and negotiated settlements. Other charges include non-recurring costs that are distinct from ongoing operational costs such as information technology costs incurred in connection with the Separation. For a full description of our restructuring actions, refer to our discussions of restructuring in "Results“Results of Operations"Operations” below and in Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefits

Our pension and other post-retirement benefit costs and obligations depend on various assumptions. Our major assumptions relate primarily to discount rates, mortality rates, expected increases in compensation levels and the expected long-term return on plan assets. The discount rate assumption is based on current investment yields of high-quality fixed-income securities with maturities similar to the expected benefits payment period. Mortality rates help predict the expected life of plan participants and are based on a historical demographic study of the plan. The expected increase in the compensation levels assumption reflects our long-term actual experience and future expectations. The expected long-term return on plan assets is

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



determined based on asset allocations, historical portfolio results, historical asset correlations and management'smanagement’s expected returns for each asset class. We evaluate our expected return assumptions annually including reviewing current capital market assumptions to assess the reasonableness of the expected long-term return on plan assets. We update the expected long-term return on assets when we observe a sufficient level of evidence that would suggest the long-term expected return has changed. In any fiscal year, significant differences may arise between the actual return and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Historically, differences between the actual return and expected long-term return on plan assets have resulted from changes in target or actual asset allocation, short-term performance relative to expected long-term performance, and to a lesser extent, differences between target and actual investment allocations, the timing of benefit payments compared to expectations, and the use of derivatives intended to effect asset allocation changes or hedge certain investment or liability exposures. For the recognition of net periodic benefit cost, the calculation of the expected long-term return on plan assets uses the fair value of plan assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year unless updated as a result of interim remeasurement.

re-measurement.

Our major assumptions vary by plan, and the weighted-average rates used are set forth in Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. The following table provides the impact changesa change of 25 basis points in each of the weighted-average assumptions of the discount rates, the


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

rate, expected increase in compensation levels and the expected long-term return on plan assets would have had on our net periodic benefit cost for fiscal 2015:

year 2017: 


 Change in
percentage points
 Change in
Net Periodic
Benefit Cost
in millions
 
Change in Net Periodic
Benefit Cost
in millions

Assumptions:

      

Discount rate

 (25)$88 $7

Expected increase in compensation levels

 25 $17 $2

Expected long-term return on plan assets

 (25)$75 $28

Taxes on Earnings

We calculate our current and deferred tax provisions based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the final positions reflected in our income tax returns. We adjust our current and deferred tax provisions based on income tax returns which are generally filed in the third or fourth quarters of the subsequent fiscal year.

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse.

We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that we are more likely than not to realize. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, we consider future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event we were to determine that it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all or part of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would increase the valuation allowance and recognize a corresponding charge to earnings or other comprehensive income in the period in which we make such a determination. Likewise, if we later determine that we are more likely than not to realize the deferred tax assets, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously recognized valuation allowance. In order for us to realize our deferred tax assets, we must be able to generate sufficient taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the deferred tax assets are located.

Our effective tax rate includes the impact of certain undistributed foreign earnings for which we have not provided U.S.United States federal taxes because we plan to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside the U.S.United States. We plan distributions of foreign earnings based on projected cash flow needs as well as the working capital and long-term investment requirements of our foreign subsidiaries and our domestic operations. Based on these assumptions, we estimate the amount we expect to indefinitely invest outside the U.S.United States and the amounts we expect to distribute to the U.S.United States and provide the U.S.United States federal taxes due on amounts expected to be distributed to the U.S.United States. Further, as a result of certain employment actions and capital investments we have undertaken, income from manufacturing activities in certain jurisdictions is subject to reduced tax rates and, in some cases, is wholly exempt from taxes for fiscal years through 2026.2027. Material changes in our

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we do business could impact how future earnings are repatriated to the U.S.,United States, and our related future effective tax rate.

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S.United States and approximately 10558 other countries, and we are subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of these jurisdictions. We believe that positions


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

taken on our tax returns are fully supported, but tax authorities may challenge these positions, which may not be fully sustained on examination by the relevant tax authorities. Accordingly, our income tax provision includes amounts intended to satisfy assessments that may result from these challenges. Determining the income tax provision for these potential assessments and recording the related effects requires management judgments and estimates. The amounts ultimately paid on resolution of an audit could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax provision and, therefore, could have a material impact on our income tax provision, net income and cash flows. Our accrual for uncertain tax positions is attributable primarily to uncertainties concerning the tax treatment of our international operations, including the allocation of income among different jurisdictions, intercompany transactions and related interest. For a further discussion on taxes on earnings, refer to Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Inventory

We state our inventory at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. We make adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value at the product group level for estimated excess or obsolescence. Factors influencing these adjustments include changes in demand, technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, physical deterioration and quality issues.

Business Combinations

        We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired, including in-process research and development ("IPR&D"), liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. IPR&D is initially capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter. When the IPR&D project is complete, it is reclassified as an amortizable purchased intangible asset and is amortized over its estimated useful life. If an IPR&D project is abandoned, we will record a charge for the value of the related intangible asset to the Consolidated Statement of Earnings in the period it is abandoned. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the acquiree is recorded as goodwill.

        When determining the fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, which includes consideration of future growth rates and margins, attrition rates, future changes in technology and brand awareness, loyalty and position, and discount rates. Fair value estimates are based on the assumptions management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Amounts recorded in a business combination may change during the measurement period, which is a period not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, as additional information about conditions existing at the acquisition date becomes available.

Goodwill

We review goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. While we are permittedWe can opt to conductperform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary totest a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or perform a two-step quantitative goodwillimpairment test. Based on a qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test for our annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we performed a quantitative test for all of our reporting units. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the

will be performed.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

reporting unit level. As of October 31, 2015, our reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 2, except for ES, which includes two reporting units: MphasiS Limited; and the remainder of ES.

In the first step of the goodwillquantitative impairment test, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount. We estimateamount with the fair value of our reporting units using a weighting of fair values derived most significantly from the income approach, and to a lesser extent, the market approach. Under the income approach, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. CashWe base cash flow projections are based on management'smanagement’s estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. TheWe base the discount rate used is based on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit'sunit’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. Under the market approach, we estimate fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics similar toas the reporting unit. We weight the fair value derived from the market approach depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach. For the MphasiS Limited reporting unit, we utilized the quoted market price in an active market to estimate fair value.

        In order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair value of our reporting units, we compare the aggregate reporting unit fair value to HP's market capitalization and calculate an implied control premium (the excess of the sum of the reporting units' fair value over HP's market capitalization). We evaluate the control premium by comparing it to observable control premiums from recent comparable transactions. If the implied control premium is not believed to be reasonable in light of these recent transactions, we reevaluate reporting unit fair values, which may result in an adjustment to the discount rate and/or other assumptions. This reevaluation could result in a change to the estimated fair value for certain or all of our reporting units.

        Estimating the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions and the determination of appropriate comparable publicly-traded companies. In addition, we make certain judgments and assumptions in allocating shared assets and liabilities to individual reporting units to determine the carrying amount of each reporting unit.

If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required.impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then we performgoodwill is impaired and the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In the second step, the reporting unit's assets, including any unrecognized intangible assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests are measured at fair value in a hypothetical analysis to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting unit in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair valueexcess of the reporting unit's goodwillunit’s carrying value over the fair value is less than its carrying amount, the difference is recordedrecognized as an impairment loss.

Our annual goodwill impairment analysis, which we performed using the qualitative assessment option as of the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, didyear 2017, resulted in a conclusion that it was more likely than not result in any impairment charges. The excess of fair value over carrying amount for our reporting units ranged from 19% to approximately 2,600% of carrying amounts. The Software reporting unit hasthat the lowest excess of fair value over carrying amount at 19%.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the estimated fair value of our reporting units inexceeded their respective carrying values. As a result, we concluded that the first step of the goodwill impairment test we applied a hypothetical 10% decrease to the fair value of each reporting unit. This hypothetical 10% decrease resulted in an excess of fair value over carrying amount for our reporting units ranging from 7% to approximately 2,400% of the carrying amounts with the Software reporting unit having the lowest excess of fair value over carrying amount of 7%. The fair value of the Software reporting unit is estimated using equal weighting of both the income and market approaches. Our Software business is facing multiple challenges including the market shift to SaaS and go-to-market execution challenges. If we arewas not successful in addressing these challenges, our projected revenue growth rates could decline resulting in a decrease in the fair value of the Software reporting unit. The fair value of the Software reporting unit could also be negatively impacted by declines in market multiples of revenue for comparable publicly-traded companies, changes in management's business strategy or significant and sustained declines in our stock price, which could result in an indicator of impairment.

necessary.

Intangible Assets

        We review intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of our finite-lived intangible assets is assessed based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount, the finite-lived intangible assets are considered to be impaired. The amount of the impairment loss, if any, is measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value. We estimate the fair value of finite-lived intangible assets by using an income approach or, when available and appropriate, using a market approach.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

We use derivative instruments to manage a variety of risks, including risks related to foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We use forwards, swaps and at times, options to hedge certain foreign currency and interest rate exposures. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes. As of October 31, 2015,2017, the gross notional value of our derivative portfolio was $52.6$25 billion. Assets and liabilities related to derivative instruments are measured at fair value, and were $1.1 billion$121 million and $0.5 billion,$372 million, respectively as of October 31, 2015.

2017.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



Fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In the absence of active markets for the identical assets or liabilities, such measurements involve developing assumptions based on market observable data and, in the absence of such data, internal information that is consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction that occurs at the measurement date. The determination of fair value often involves significant judgments about assumptions such as determining an appropriate discount rate that factors in both risk and liquidity premiums, identifying the similarities and differences in market transactions, weighting those differences accordingly and then making the appropriate adjustments to those market transactions to reflect the risks specific to the asset or liability being valued. We generally use industry standard valuation models to measure the fair value of our derivative positions. When prices in active markets are not available for the identical asset or liability, we use industry standard valuation models to measure fair value. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to present value using market-based


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

observable inputs, including interest rate curves, HP and counterparty credit risk, foreign currency exchange rates, and forward and spot prices.

For a further discussion on fair value measurements and derivative instruments, refer to Note 119, “Fair Value” and Note 12,10, “Financial Instruments”, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Loss Contingencies

We are involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings including those consisting of IP,intellectual property (“IP”), commercial, securities, employment, employee benefits and environmental matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine both the probability of having incurred a liability and the estimated amount of the liability. We review these matters at least quarterly and adjust these liabilities to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other updated information and events, pertaining to a particular case. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, we share responsibility with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain matters, as discussed in Note 14, “Litigation and Contingencies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify us in whole or in part with respect to certain matters. Based on our experience, we believe that any damage amounts claimed in the specific litigation and contingencies matters further discussed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference,14, “Litigation and Contingencies”, are not a meaningful indicator of HP'sHP’s potential liability. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, we believe we have valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against us. Nevertheless, cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies. We believe we have recorded adequate provisions for any such matters and, as of October 31, 2015,2017, it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in our financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

For a summary of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our consolidated financial statements see Note 1, “Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue from our international operations has historically represented, and we expect will continue to represent, a majority of our overall net revenue. As a result, our net revenue growth has been impacted, and we expect it will continue to be impacted, by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In order to provide a framework for assessing performance excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, we presentsupplement the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue with the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue on a constant currency basis, which assumes noexcludes the change inof foreign currency exchange ratesfluctuations and hedging activities from the prior-year period and doesn'tdoes not adjust for any repricing or demand impacts from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This information is provided so that net revenue can be viewed with and without the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which is consistent with how management evaluates our net revenue results and trends. Thistrends, as management does not believe that the excluded items are reflective of ongoing operating results. The constant currency disclosure ismeasures are provided in addition to, and not as a substitute for, the year-over-year percentage change in net revenue on a GAAP basis. Other companies may calculate and define similarly labeled items differently, which may limit the usefulness of this measure for comparative purposes.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)




Results of operations in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Net revenue

 $103,355  100.0%$111,454  100.0%$112,298  100.0%

Cost of sales(1)

  78,596  76.0% 84,839  76.1% 86,380  76.9%

Gross profit

  24,759  24.0% 26,615  23.9% 25,918  23.1%

Research and development

  3,502  3.4% 3,447  3.1% 3,135  2.8%

Selling, general and administrative

  12,185  11.8% 13,353  12.0% 13,267  11.8%

Amortization of intangible assets

  931  0.9% 1,000  0.9% 1,373  1.2%

Restructuring charges

  1,017  1.0% 1,619  1.5% 990  0.9%

Acquisition and other related charges

  90  0.1% 11  0.0% 22  0.0%

Separation costs

  1,259  1.2%        

Defined benefit plan settlement charges

  168  0.2%        

Impairment of data center assets

  136  0.1%        

Earnings from operations

  5,471  5.3% 7,185  6.4% 7,131  6.4%

Interest and other, net

  (739) (0.7)% (628) (0.6)% (621) (0.6)%

Earnings before taxes

  4,732  4.6% 6,557  5.8% 6,510  5.8%

Provision for taxes

  (178) (0.2)% (1,544) (1.3)% (1,397) (1.2)%

Net earnings

 $4,554  4.4%$5,013  4.5%$5,113  4.6%

(1)
Cost of products, cost of services and financing interest.

 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 Dollars in millions
Net revenue$52,056
 100.0 % $48,238
 100.0 % $51,463
 100.0 %
Cost of revenue42,478
 81.6 % 39,240
 81.3 % 41,524
 80.7 %
Gross profit9,578
 18.4 % 8,998
 18.7 % 9,939
 19.3 %
Research and development1,190
 2.3 % 1,209
 2.5 % 1,191
 2.3 %
Selling, general and administrative4,376
 8.4 % 3,833
 8.0 % 4,719
 9.2 %
Restructuring and other charges362
 0.7 % 205
 0.4 % 63
 0.1 %
Acquisition-related charges125
 0.2 % 7
 0.0%
 1
 0.0%
Amortization of intangible assets1
 0.0%
 16
 0.0%
 102
 0.2 %
Defined benefit plan settlement charges (credits)5
 0.0%
 179
 0.4 % (57) (0.1)%
Earnings from continuing operations3,519
 6.8 % 3,549
 7.4 % 3,920
 7.6 %
Interest and other, net(243) (0.5)% 212
 0.4 % (388) (0.7)%
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes3,276
 6.3 % 3,761
 7.8 % 3,532
 6.9 %
(Provision for) benefit from taxes(750) (1.4)% (1,095) (2.3)% 186
 0.3 %
Net earnings from continuing operations2,526
 4.9 % 2,666
 5.5 % 3,718
 7.2 %
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes
 

 (170) 

 836
 

Net earnings$2,526
 

 $2,496
 

 $4,554
 

Net Revenue

In fiscal 2015,year 2017, total HP net revenue declined 7.3% (decreased 2.1%increased 7.9% (increased 8.7% on a constant currency basis) as compared with fiscal year 2016. Net revenue from the United States increased 7.1% to fiscal 2014. U.S. net revenue decreased 2.9% to $37.7$19.3 billion and net revenue from outside of the U.S. decreased 9.6%United States increased 8.4% to $65.7$32.8 billion. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by growth in Notebooks, Desktops and Supplies revenue, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
In fiscal 2014,year 2016, total HP net revenue declined 0.8%decreased 6.3% (decreased 0.4%2.0% on a constant currency basis) as compared with fiscal year 2015. Net revenue from the United States increased 1.7% to fiscal 2013. U.S. net revenue decreased 3.7% to $38.8$18.0 billion, while net revenue from outside of the U.S. increased 0.9%United States decreased 10.4% to $72.6$30.2 billion.

The primary factors contributing to the net revenue decline were unfavorable foreign currency impacts, weak market demand, competitive pricing pressures and the change in the Supplies sales model. The net revenue decline was driven by decline in supplies, commercial and consumer printers, commercial and consumer desktops and consumer notebooks, partially offset by growth in commercial notebooks.
A more detailed discussion of the factors contributing to the changes in segment net revenue is included under “Segment Information” below. 

Table

Gross Margin

 Our gross margin was 18.4% for fiscal year 2017 compared with 18.7% for fiscal year 2016. The primary factors impacting the gross margin decrease were lower Personal System gross margin driven by higher commodity costs, unfavorable foreign currency impacts and higher mix of Contents

Personal Systems revenue, partially offset by productivity improvements in Printing.

 Our gross margin was 18.7% for fiscal year 2016 compared with 19.3% for fiscal year 2015. The decline in gross margin performance was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by operational improvements.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        The components of the weighted net revenue change by segment were as follows:



 
 For the fiscal
years ended
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 Percentage Points
 

Personal Systems

  (2.6) 1.8 

Enterprise Services

  (2.3) (1.5)

Printing

  (1.8) (0.8)

HP Financial Services

  (0.3) (0.1)

Corporate Investments/Other

  (0.3) 0.1 

Software

  (0.2) (0.1)

Enterprise Group

  0.2  (0.2)

Total HP

  (7.3) (0.8)

Fiscal 2015 compared with Fiscal 2014

        For fiscal 2015, total net revenue decreased 7.3 percentage points. From a segment perspective, the primary factors contributing to the change in net revenue are summarized as follows:

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        For fiscal 2014, total net revenue decreased 0.8 percentage points. From a segment perspective, the primary factors contributing to the change in net revenue are summarized as follows:


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

A more detailed discussion of the factors contributing to the changes in segment revenuegross margins is included under "Segment Information"“Segment Information” below.

Gross Margin

Fiscal 2015 compared with Fiscal 2014

        HP's gross margin increased by 0.1 percentage points for

Operating Expenses
Research and Development (“R&D”)
R&D expense decreased 2% in fiscal year 20152017 compared withto fiscal 2014. From a segment perspective, the primary factors impacting gross margin performance are summarized as follows:

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        HP's gross margin increased by 0.8 percentage points for fiscal year 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. From a segment perspective, the primary factors impacting gross margin performance are summarized as follows:

A3 products in fiscal year 2016, partially offset by continuing investment in Printing.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        A more detailed discussion of segment gross margins and operating margins is included under "Segment Information" below.

Operating Expenses

R&D expense increased 2% in fiscal 2015year 2016 as compared to fiscal 2014year 2015 primarily due primarily to expenses from the acquisition of Arubaincremental investments in A3 and increases in Technology Services, cloud and HP Labs,3D printing, partially offset by favorable foreign currency impacts.

        R&D

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
SG&A expense increased 10%14% in fiscal 2014year 2017 as compared to fiscal 2013 with increases across eachyear 2016, primarily due to a gain from the divestiture of our segments as we made investmentsmarketing optimization assets in our strategic focus areas of cloud, security, big datafiscal year 2016 and mobility.

an increase in field selling costs.

SG&A expense decreased 9%19% in fiscal 2015year 2016 as compared to fiscal 2014year 2015 primarily due primarily to gains from the divestiture of certain software assets to Open Text Corporation, lower corporate governance and other overhead costs related to the pre-Separation combined entity, our cost-saving initiatives and favorable foreign currency impacts and declines in go-to-market costs as a result of lower commissions and productivity initiatives.

        SG&A expense increased 1% in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 due primarily to higher compensation costs, litigation expenses and higher selling costs from investments in the areas of cloud, networking and storage,impacts. These effects were partially offset by gainsthe gain from salesthe divestiture of real estate and lower program spendingSnapfish in marketing.


Amortization of Intangible Assets

Amortization expense decreased by $15 million and $86 million in fiscal 2015year 2017 and in fiscal 2014year 2016 respectively, year-over-year, primarily due primarily to certain intangible assets associated withfrom prior acquisitions reaching the end of their respective amortization periods, partially offsetperiods.

Restructuring and other Charges
Restructuring and other charges increased by amortization expense from intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Aruba$157 million in fiscal 2015.


Restructuring Charges

        Restructuringand other charges decreased 37%increased by $142 million in fiscal 2015year 2016 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due primarily to lowerseverance pay and infrastructure related charges from the multi-yearour restructuring plan initially announced in May 2012September 2015 (the "2012 Plan"“Fiscal 2015 Plan”).

        On September 14, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan (the "2015 Plan") in connection with the Separation which will be implemented through fiscal 2018. As a result, HP recognized $391 million of charges related to the 2015 Plan during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        Restructuring charges increased in fiscal 2014 due primarily to higher charges in connection with the 2012 Plan and from increases to the 2012 Plan announced in fiscal 2014. During fiscal 2014, HP increased the total for positions expected to be eliminated under the 2012 Plan from 34,000 to 55,000 positions. In fiscal 2015, HP recognized restructuring charges of $640 million in connection with the 2012 Plan.

        Acquisition and other related charges increased for fiscal 2015, due primarily to the acquisition of Aruba resulting in a non-cash inventory fair value adjustment charge and professional services and legal fees associated with the acquisition.

        Separation costs for fiscal 2015 were primarily comprised of third-party consulting, contractor fees and other related costs.

        Defined benefit plan settlement charges for fiscal 2015 were related to U.S. defined benefit plan settlement expense and net periodic benefit cost resulting from the voluntary lump sum program announced in January 2015.

        Impairment of data center assets for fiscal 2015 was related to our exit from several ES data centers.

Interest and Other, Net

Interest and other, net expense increased by $111$455 million in fiscal 2015.year 2017 compared to the prior-year period. The increase was primarily due to lower tax indemnification income in connection with $167fiscal year 2017 from Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain tax liabilities that HP is jointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by Hewlett Packard Enterprise under the tax matters agreement.

Interest and other, net expense decreased by $600 million of early debt settlement costsin fiscal year 2016 compared to the prior-year period. The decrease was primarily due to higher tax indemnification income in fiscal year 2016 from Hewlett Packard Enterprise under the tax matters agreement and higherlower foreign currency transaction losses, partially offset by lower interest expense due to lower weighted average interest rates and a decrease in miscellaneous other expenses.

        Interest and other, net expense increased by $7 million in fiscal 2014. The increase was due primarily to higher currency transaction losses partially offset by lower interest expense from a lower average debt balance.

income.

Provision for Taxes

Our effective tax rates were 3.8%22.9%, 23.5%29.1% and 21.5%(5.3)% in fiscal 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to favorable tax rates associated with certain earnings from our operations in lower tax jurisdictions throughout the world. The jurisdictions with favorable tax rates that had the most significant impact on HP'sour effective tax rate in the periods presented were Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, Malaysia Ireland and Netherlands. HP plansIreland. We plan to reinvest certain earnings of these jurisdictions indefinitely outside the U.S.United States and therefore hashave not provided

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



U.S. taxes on those indefinitely reinvested earnings.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion In addition to the above factors, the overall tax rates in fiscal year 2017 were impacted by adjustments to valuation allowances and Analysis of
Financial Conditionstate income taxes, and Results of Operations (Continued)

the overall tax rates in fiscal year 2016 were impacted by adjustments to valuation allowances and uncertain tax positions.

For a reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% and further explanation of our provision for taxes, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.


In fiscal year 2017, we recorded $72 million of net income tax benefit related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. These amounts primarily include tax benefits of $84 million related to restructuring and other charges, $12 million related to U.S. federal provision to return adjustments, $45 million related to Samsung acquisition-related charges, and $13 million of other net tax benefits. In addition, we recorded tax charges of $11 million related to changes in state valuation allowances, $22 million of state provision to return adjustments, and $49 million related to uncertain tax positions.
In fiscal year 2016, we recorded $301 million of net income tax charges related to discrete items in the provision for taxes for continuing operations. These amounts primarily include uncertain tax position charges of $525 million related to pre-separation tax matters. In addition, we recorded $62 million of net tax benefits on restructuring charges, $52 million of net tax benefits related to the release of foreign valuation allowances and $41 million of net tax benefits arising from the retroactive research and development credit provided by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 signed into law in December 2015 and $70 million of other tax benefit.

In fiscal year 2015, we recorded $1.6$1.2 billion of net income tax benefits related to discrete items unique toin the year.provision for taxes for continuing operations. These amounts included $1.8$1.7 billion of tax benefitbenefits due to a release of valuation allowances pertaining to certain U.S. deferred tax assets, and $486 million tax charge to record valuation allowances on certain foreign deferred tax assets, both related to legal entities within the ES business, $394 million of tax charges for adjustments to uncertain tax positions and the settlement of tax audit matters, inclusive of $449 million of tax charges related to uncertain tax positions on pension transfers, and $3$70 million of tax charges for various provisionbenefits related to return adjustmentsstate tax impacts, and other adjustments. In addition, we recorded $639$6 million of net tax benefits on restructuring, separation-related and other charges and a tax benefit of $47 million arising from the retroactive research and development credit resulting from the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014, which was signed into law in December 2014.

        We recorded gross deferred tax assets of $12.5 billion, $14.0 billion and $13.6 billion at October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 which were reduced by valuation allowances of $9.9 billion, $11.9 billion and $11.4 billion respectively. Total valuation allowances decreased by $2 billion in fiscal 2015 associated with the release of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in the U.S., and increased by $525 million in fiscal 2014, associated primarily with foreign net operating losses.

        In fiscal 2014, we recorded $53 million of net income tax charges related to items unique to the year.

        In fiscal 2013, we recorded $471 million of net income tax charges related to items unique to the year. These amounts included $214 million of net increases to valuation allowances, $406 million of tax charges for adjustments to uncertain tax positions and the settlement of tax audit matters and $47 million of tax charges for various prior period adjustments.other items. In addition, we recorded $146$33 million of tax benefits from adjustments to prior year foreign income tax accrualscharges on restructuring and a tax benefit of $50 million arising from the retroactive research and development credit resulting from the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which was signed into law in January 2013.

pension-related costs.

Segment Information

A description of the products and services for each segment can be found in Note 2, “Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. Future changes to this organizational structure may result in changes to the segments disclosed.

        Effective at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal 2015, we implemented an organizational change to align our segment financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. This organizational change resulted in the transfer of third-party multi-vendor support arrangements from the TS business unit within the EG segment to the ITO business unit within the ES segment. We have reflected this change to our segment information retrospectively to the earliest period presented, which has resulted in the removal of intersegment revenue from the TS business unit within the EG segment and the related corporate intersegment revenue eliminations, and the transfer of operating profit from the TS business unit within the EG segment to the ITO business unit within the ES segment.

        In connection with the Separation, effective at the beginning of its fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we implemented an organizational change which resulted in the transfer of marketing optimization solutions business from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Printing segment. We have reflected this change to our segment information in prior reporting periods on an as-if basis, which resulted in the transfer of net revenue from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. This change also resulted in the transfer of operating profit from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. In addition, this change resulted in the reclassification of $512 million of goodwill from the Software segment to the Printing segment.

        These changes had no impact on our previously reported consolidated net revenue, earnings from operations, net earnings or net earnings per share.

Printing and

Personal Systems Group

        The Personal Systems segment and the Printing segment are structured beneath a broader Printing and Personal Systems Group ("PPS"). We describe the results of the business segments within PPS below.

Personal Systems


 For the fiscal years ended October 31 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015

 Dollars in millions
 Dollars in millions

Net revenue

 $31,469 $34,303 $32,179 $33,374
 $29,987
 $31,520

Earnings from operations

 $1,064 $1,270 $980 $1,213
 $1,150
 $1,022

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

 3.4% 3.7% 3.0%3.6% 3.8% 3.2%

The components of net revenue and the weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:

 
  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 
 
 Net Revenue 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 Dollars in millions
  
 

Desktop PCs

 $10,941 $13,197  (6.6)

Notebook PCs

  17,271  17,540  (0.8)

Workstations

  2,018  2,218  (0.6)

Other

  1,239  1,348  (0.3)

Total Personal Systems

 $31,469 $34,303  (8.3)


 
  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 
 
 Net Revenue 
 
 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
  
 

Desktop PCs

 $13,197 $12,844  1.1 

Notebook PCs

  17,540  16,029  4.7 

Workstations

  2,218  2,147  0.2 

Other

  1,348  1,159  0.6 

Total Personal Systems

 $34,303 $32,179  6.6 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)




 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 Net Revenue
Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage Points
 2017
2016
 Dollars in millions
 
Notebooks$19,782

$16,982

9.4
Desktops10,298

9,956

1.1
Workstations2,042

1,870

0.6
Other1,252

1,179

0.2
Total Personal Systems$33,374

$29,987

11.3
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 Net Revenue Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage Points
 2016 2015 
 Dollars in millions  
Notebooks$16,982

$17,271

(0.9)
Desktops9,956

10,941

(3.1)
Workstations1,870

2,018

(0.5)
Other1,179

1,290

(0.4)
Total Personal Systems$29,987

$31,520

(4.9)
Fiscal 2015Year 2017 compared with Fiscal 2014Year 2016


Personal Systems net revenue decreased 8.3% (decreased 3.1%increased 11.3% (increased 12.3% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2015.year 2017. The net revenue declineincrease was primarily due to growth in Personal Systems was due primarily toNotebooks, Desktops and Workstations partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts, particularly in EMEA, and weakening market demand. Personal Systemsimpacts. The net revenue decreasedincrease was driven by a 6.7% increase in unit volume combined with a 4.3% increase in average selling prices (“ASPs”) as compared to fiscal year 2016. The increase in unit volume was primarily due to growth in Notebooks and Workstations. The increase in ASPs was primarily due to favorable pricing partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Consumer revenue increased 16% in fiscal year 2017, driven by growth in Notebooks and Desktops as a result of a 5% decline in average selling prices ("ASPs") and a 3% decline in unit volume. The decline in ASPs was due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts, a shift in consumer PCs to low end products and a lower mix of commercial PCs within Personal Systems. Thehigher unit volume decline was due primarily to a unit volume declinecombined with higher ASPs. Commercial revenue increased 9% in desktops, partially offsetfiscal year 2017, driven by a unit volume growth in notebooks, both consumerNotebooks and commercial.

Workstations. Net revenue for commercial clients decreased 8% due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts, a declineincreased 16% in commercial desktops as a result of weak market demand and higher net revenue in the prior-year period resulting from the replacement of the Windows XP operating system. Net revenue for consumer clients decreased 8% due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts and a decline in consumer desktops. Net revenue declined 17% in Desktop PCs, 2% in Notebook PCs,Notebooks, 9% in Workstations and 8%3% in Other. The net revenue declineDesktops in Other was due primarily to a decline in consumer tablets, the sale of IP in the prior-year period, and unfavorable currency impacts, the effects of which were partially offset by increased sales of extended warranties.

fiscal year 2017.


Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.30.2 percentage points forin fiscal 2015 as a result ofyear 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in gross margin combined with an increasepartially offset by a decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue.expenses. The declinedecrease in gross margin was primarily due primarily to an increase in commodity cost and unfavorable foreign currency impacts and a lower mix of commercial products, partially offset by favorable component costs and operational cost improvements.higher ASPs. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue increaseddecreased primarily due primarily to the size of the net revenue decline, higher administrative expenses as a result of lower bad debt recoveries as compared to the prior-year period and higher R&D investments in commercial, mobility and immersive computing products, the effects of which were partially offset by a decline in field selling costs as a result of favorable currency impacts and operational cost improvements.

operating expense management.


Fiscal 2014Year 2016 compared with Fiscal 2013

Year 2015

Personal Systemssystems net revenue increased 6.6% (increased 7.2%decreased 4.9% (decreased 0.9% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2014. While the Personal Systems business continued to be challenged by the market shift towards mobility products, the pace of the PC marketyear 2016. The net revenue decline slowed with signs of stabilization driven by growth in commercial PCs, the effects of which were partially offset by weakness in consumer PCs. The revenue increase in Personal Systems was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts and weak market demand. Personal Systems net revenue decreased as a result of a 3.5% decline in unit volume along with a 1% decline in ASPs as compared to the prior-year period. The unit volume decline was primarily due to an overall decline in desktops and consumer notebooks, partially offset by unit volume growth in commercial PCs, particularly notebooks, along with growth in consumer notebooks. Personal Systems experienced revenue growth across all regions led by double digit revenue growth in EMEA, which experienced improved demand. The revenue increase was driven by an 8.2% increase in unit volume, the effects of which were partially offset by a 1.5% decline in ASPs. The unit volume increase was primarily led by growth in commercial notebooks as well as strength in commercial desktops, consumer notebooks and thin client products. The decline in ASPs was primarily due primarily to a competitive pricing environment and unfavorable currency impacts,in the effects of which werecommercial segment partially offset by afavorable pricing in the consumer segment and favorable mix of commercial PCs.

        Net revenue for commercial clients increased 10% due primarily to the benefits from the delayed installed base refresh cycle, the effects of customers migrating from the Windows XP operating system and growthshift in all product categories partly driven by new product introductions, including the HP Elite

consumer high-end premium products.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

products.




Consumer and commercial revenue both decreased by 5%, primarily due to weak market demand, partially offset by an increase in commercial notebooks and PC services. Net revenue for consumer clients remained flatdeclined 2% in Notebooks, 9% in Desktops, 7% in Workstations and 9% in Other as growth in consumer notebooks, partly driven by our new product lineup including Chromebooks and hybrid products, was offset by a decline in consumer desktops. For fiscal 2014, net revenue for Notebook PCs increased 9%, Desktop PCs increased 3%, Workstations increased 3% and Other net revenue increased 16%.compared to the prior-year period. The net revenue increasedecline in Other was primarily due to the sale of IPlower sales in consumer tablets and Personal Systems options partially offset by revenue growth in mobility products, primarily consumer tablets which were introduced in the second half of fiscal 2013.

PC services.


Personal Systems earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased 0.7by 0.6 percentage points forin fiscal 2014.year 2016. The increase was driven by an increaseprimarily due to growth in gross margin driven by favorable commodity costs combined with product mix and a decline in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The increase in gross margin was due primarily to operational cost improvements, a favorable commercial mix and the sale of IP,PC services, the effects of which were partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.impacts in revenue. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased dueincreased by 0.1 percentage point primarily to our cost structure optimization efforts, the effects of which were partially offset by increased research and development investments for commercial, mobility and immersive computing products, as well as higher administrative expenses driven by lower bad debt recoveries as compared to fiscal 2013.

an increase in field selling cost.



Printing


 For the fiscal years ended October 31 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015

 Dollars in millions
 Dollars in millions

Net revenue

 $21,232 $23,211 $24,128 $18,801
 $18,260
 $21,232

Earnings from operations

 $3,865 $4,229 $3,953 $3,161
 $3,128
 $3,765

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

 18.2% 18.2% 16.4%16.8% 17.1% 17.7%

The components of the net revenue and weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:


 For the fiscal years ended October 31 

  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 Net Revenue Net Revenue Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage Points

 2015 2014 2017 2016 

 Dollars in millions
  
 Dollars in millions  

Supplies

 $13,979 $14,917 (4.0)$12,416
 $11,875
 3.0

Commercial Hardware

 5,378 5,949 (2.5)3,973
 4,035
 (0.3)

Consumer Hardware

 1,875 2,345 (2.0)2,412
 2,350
 0.3

Total Printing

 $21,232 $23,211 (8.5)$18,801
 $18,260
 3.0

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



 For the fiscal years ended October 31 

  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 Net Revenue Net Revenue Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage Points

 2014 2013 2016 2015 

 Dollars in millions
  
 Dollars in millions  

Supplies

 $14,917 $15,716 (3.3)$11,875
 $13,979
 (9.9)
Commercial Hardware4,035
 4,350
 (1.5)

Consumer Hardware

 2,345 2,436 (0.4)2,350
 2,903
 (2.6)

Commercial Hardware

 5,949 5,976 (0.1)

Total Printing

 $23,211 $24,128 (3.8)$18,260
 $21,232
 (14.0)

Fiscal 2015Year 2017 compared with Fiscal 2014

Year 2016

Printing net revenue decreased 8.5% (decreased 5.1%increased 3.0% (increased 3.5% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal 2015.year 2017. The decline in net revenue was due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts, decline in Supplies, weak market demand and competitive pricing pressures, the effects of which were partially offset by growth in graphics products. From a regional perspective, Printing experienced a net revenue decline across all regions, primarily in EMEA and particularly in Russia as a result of challenges in those markets.

        Net revenue for Supplies decreased 6% due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts and demand weakness in toner and ink, partially offset by growth in graphics supplies. The demand weakness in toner was particularly in EMEA, led by a net revenue decline in Russia. Printer unit volumes declined 7% while average revenue per unit ("ARU") decreased 7%. Printer unit volume declined due primarily to a decline in LaserJet and home printer units, the effects of which were partially offset by growth in graphics printer units. The ARU for printers decreased due primarily to a highly competitive pricing environment and unfavorable currency impacts on Inkjet and LaserJet printers. Net revenue for Commercial Hardware decreased 10% driven by a 7% decline in printer unit volume and a 4% decline in ARU, partially offset by a net revenue increase in other peripheral solutions. In Commercial Hardware, the decline in unit volume was due primarily to an overall decline in LaserJet printer units, partially offset by growth in graphics printer units. The ARU decline in Commercial Hardware was due primarily to a competitive pricing environment and unfavorable currency impacts. Net revenue for Consumer Hardware decreased 20% driven by a 13% decline in ARU and a 7% decline in unit volume. The ARU decline in Consumer Hardware was due primarily to a competitive pricing environment and unfavorable currency impacts. The unit volume decline in Consumer Hardware was due primarily to lower sales of home and SMB printer units.

        Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue remained flat for fiscal 2015 due to a decline in gross margin, offset by lower operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The decline in gross margin was due primarily to a competitive pricing environment in hardware and unfavorable currency impacts, the effects of which were partially offset by a favorable mix of ink and graphics supplies and favorable currency impacts from the Japanese yen. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased due primarily to our cost saving initiatives, lower marketing expenses, the impact of the divestiture of our photo printing service Snapfish and favorable currency impacts.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        In fiscal 2014, Printing experienced a decline in revenue and an increase in operating profit as we continued to push our print strategies, which includes driving high value printer unit placements and expanding our graphics products and managed print services portfolio. Printing net revenue decreased 3.8% (decreased 3.3% on a constant currency basis) for fiscal 2014. The decline in net revenue was primarily driven by a declinethe increase in Supplies the effects of which were partially offset by growth in graphics products and managed print services.

revenue. Net revenue for Supplies decreased 5% driven by demand weakness in toner and ink, and a reduction in channel inventoryincreased 4.6% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to the change in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014,Supplies sales model in the effects of which wereprior-year period and better discount management, partially offset by growth in graphics supplies.unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Printer unit volume remained flatincreased 3.4% while ARUASPs decreased 1%.0.9% as compared to the prior-year period. The increase in Printer unit volume was flat due primarily to our continued efforts to target high value areas of the market, which resulted in a decline in home printer units and low value LaserJet printer units, the effects of which were offset by increased units in SMB, multifunction laser and graphics printers. The decline in ARU was due primarily to increased discounting driven by competitive pricing pressures. Net revenue for Commercial Hardware was flat as a 3% increase in printer unit volume was offset by a 3% decline in printer ARU. The unit volume in Commercial Hardware increased due primarily to growth in our multifunction laser printers and graphics printers. The ARU decline in Commercial Hardware was due primarily to a decline in LaserJet and graphics printers driven by a competitive pricing environment. Net revenue for Consumer Hardware decreased 4% driven by a 1% decline in printer unit volume and a 1% decline in ARU, along with a decline in other peripheral printing solutions. The unit volume declineincreases in Consumer Hardware wasand larger opportunity to place incremental units with positive net present value. Printer ASPs decreased primarily due to lower sales of home printers, the effects of which were partially offset by growth in SMB printers. The ARU decline in Consumer Hardware was due primarily to increased discounting for SMB printers due to a competitive pricing environment, the effects of which were partially offset by a favorable mix of high value home printers.

        Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 1.8 percentage points for fiscal 2014 as an increase in gross margin more than offset an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The gross margin increase was due to favorableunfavorable foreign currency impacts primarily driven by the Japanese yen, continued cost structure improvements and a favorable mix from a higher proportion of graphics and ink supplies, the effects of which were partially offset by a competitive pricing environment. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue increased due primarily to higher R&D expenses as a result of our investments in enterprise products and 3-D printing, the effects of which were partially offset by reduced marketing expenses.

Enterprise Group

impacts.
 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Net revenue

 $27,907 $27,723 $28,003 

Earnings from operations

 $3,981 $3,995 $4,245 

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

  14.3% 14.4% 15.2%

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

        The components





Net revenue for Commercial Hardware decreased 2% as compared to the prior-year period, driven by a decline in other printing solutions largely due to the divestiture of marketing optimization assets in the netprior-year period, partially offset by revenue and weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 
 
 Net Revenue 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 Dollars in millions
  
 

Technology Services

 $7,662 $8,375  (2.6)

Storage

  3,180  3,316  (0.5)

Business Critical Systems

  807  929  (0.4)

Networking

  2,846  2,629  0.8 

Industry Standard Servers

  13,412  12,474  3.4 

Total Enterprise Group

 $27,907 $27,723  0.7 


 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 
 
 Net Revenue 
 
 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
  
 

Technology Services

 $8,375 $8,710  (1.2)

Storage

  3,316  3,475  (0.6)

Business Critical Systems

  929  1,190  (0.9)

Networking

  2,629  2,526  0.4 

Industry Standard Servers

  12,474  12,102  1.3 

Total Enterprise Group

 $27,723 $28,803  (1.0)

        EG net revenue increased 0.7% (increased 6.3% on a constant currency basis)from 3D printing in fiscal 2015.year 2017. ASPs decreased by 0.1% while unit volume increased by 2.0%. The increaseunit volume increased primarily due to a larger opportunity to place incremental units with positive net present value. The decrease in EG net revenueASPs was primarily due primarily to growth in ISS and from our acquisition of Aruba in May 2015,unfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset primarily by unfavorable currency impacts led by the euro and a net revenue decline in TS. However, we continued to experience challenges due to market trends, including the transition to cloud computing, as well as product and technology transitions, along with a highly competitive pricing environment.

        ISS net revenue increased 8% as a result of higher average unit prices ("AUPs) and unit volume growth. The increase in AUP's was across the server portfolio, primarily driven by higher option attach rates for memory, processors and hard drives and a mix shift to high-end new generation HP ProLiant servers.higher-end printers. Net revenue for Consumer Hardware increased 3% as compared to the prior-year period due to a 4% increase in printer unit volume, partially offset by 0.4% decrease in ASPs. The unit volume growthincrease was driven by the Home business. The decrease in ASPs was primarily due to shipment increases in rack and density optimized server products. Networking net revenue increased 8% due primarily to revenue from Aruba, which resulted in higher revenue from wireless local area network ("WLAN") products, the effect of which wasunfavorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by competitive pricing pressures, particularly in the China market. Storage net revenue decreased 4% as a result of a decline in traditional storage products, the effect of which was partially offset by growth in Converged Storage solutions from the 3PAR StoreServ products,

better discount management.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

particularly All-flash arrays, and StoreOnce. BCS net revenue decreased 13% largely as a result of contraction in the overall UNIX market. TS net revenue decreased 9% due primarily to a reduction in support for BCS and traditional storage products along with lower revenue from consulting services, the effects of which were partially offset by growth in HP Data Center Care and HP Proactive Care support solutions.

        In fiscal 2015, EG

Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.10.3 percentage pointpoints for the fiscal year 2017 as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to an increase in operating expenses, partially offset by an improved gross margin. The gross margin increased due to operational improvements, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Operating expenses increased primarily due to a decreasegain from the divestiture of marketing optimization assets in gross margin partially offset by a decreasethe prior-year period and an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The decrease in gross margin was due primarily to a higher revenue mix of ISS products, unfavorable currency impacts and competitive pricing, the effects of which were partially offset by improved cost management, improved pricing in Storage and a higher gross margin contribution in Networking from Aruba. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was due primarily to favorable currency impacts, partially offset by expenses during the period from Aruba.

marketing investments.


Fiscal 2014Year 2016 compared with Fiscal 2013

        EGYear 2015

Printing net revenue decreased 1.0%14.0% (decreased 0.6%9.3% on a constant currency basis) infor fiscal 2014. In EG, we continued to experience revenue challenges due to market trends, including the transition to cloud computing, as well as product and technology transitions, along with a highly competitive pricing environment.year 2016. The decline in EG net revenue was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts, weakness in demand, impact from the change in the Supplies sales model and competitive pricing pressures. These factors resulted in a net revenue declinesdecline across Supplies and Consumer and Commercial Hardware. Net revenue for Supplies decreased 15% as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency impacts, demand weakness combined with a competitive pricing environment and impact of the change in TS, BCSthe Supplies sales model. Printer unit volume decreased 12% and StorageASPs increased by 2% as compared to the prior-year period. Printer unit volume decreased due to weakness in demand, our pricing discipline and focus on placing positive NPV units. Printer ASPs increased primarily due to a favorable mix shift to high-value printers, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Net revenue for Commercial Hardware decreased 7% for fiscal year 2016 as compared to the prior-year period primarily driven by an 8% decline in unit volume and a decrease in other peripheral printing solutions. The unit volume in Commercial Hardware declined primarily due to a unit volume decline in LaserJet printers. The ASPs in Commercial Hardware increased by 2% primarily due to a mix shift to high-value printer sales offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Printer unit volume in Consumer Hardware declined 12%, combined with a decline in other printing solutions largely driven by the divestiture of Snapfish in the prior-year period and a 2% decline in ASPs, resulted in a 19% decline in Consumer Hardware net revenue growthfor fiscal year 2016 as compared to the prior-year period. The unit volume decline in ISS and Networking.

        TS net revenue decreased 4%Consumer Hardware was primarily due primarily to a continued reduction in support for BCS, traditional storage products and lower support in networking services, partially offset by growth in support solutions for Converged Storage solutions and ISS. BCS net revenue decreased 22% as a result of ongoing pressures from the overall UNIX market contraction. Storage net revenue decreased by 5% as we continue to experience multiple challenges including product transitions from traditional storage products which include our tape, storage networking and legacy external disk products, to converged solutions, which include our 3PAR StoreServ, StoreOnce, and StoreVirtual products, other challenges include market weakness in high-end converged solutionsdemand, our pricing discipline and sales execution challenges, the effects of which were partially offset by revenue growthour continued efforts to place positive NPV units. The ASPs in our Converged Storage solutions. Networking net revenue increased 4%Consumer Hardware decreased primarily due to higher switching product revenue as a result of growth in our data center products, partially offset by lower revenue from WLAN products. ISS net revenue increased by 3% due primarily to higher volume and higher average unit prices in rack and blade server products driven by higher option attach rates for memory, processors and hard drives.

        EGunfavorable foreign currency impacts.

Printing earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.80.6% percentage points infor fiscal 2014year 2016 as compared to the prior-year period due to a decrease in gross margin coupled with an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The gross margin decline was due primarily to a higher mix of ISS products, a lower mix of BCS products and competitive pricing pressure in ISS and Networking, partially offset by supply chain cost optimization and improved cost management in TS. The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was driven by higher R&D investments in storage, networking and ISS, partially offset by continued cost savings associated with our ongoing restructuring efforts.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Enterprise Services

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Net revenue

 $19,806 $22,398 $24,061 

Earnings from operations

 $1,051 $816 $693 

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

  5.3% 3.6% 2.9%

        The components of the net revenue and weighted net revenue change by business unit were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 
 
 Net Revenue 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 Dollars in millions
  
 

Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing

 $12,107 $14,038  (8.6)

Application and Business Services

  7,699  8,360  (3.0)

Total Enterprise Services

 $19,806 $22,398  (11.6)


 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
  
  
 Weighted
Net Revenue
Change
Percentage
Points
 
 
 Net Revenue 
 
 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
  
 

Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing

 $14,038 $15,223  (4.9)

Application and Business Services

  8,360  8,838  (2.0)

Total Enterprise Services

 $22,398 $24,061  (6.9)

        ES net revenue decreased 11.6% (decreased 5.7% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2015. Performance in ES remained challenged by the impact of several large contracts winding down. The net revenue decrease in ES was due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts, revenue runoff in key accounts and weak growth in new and existing accounts, partially offset by growth in our SES portfolio which includes analytics and data management, security and cloud services. Net revenue in ITO decreased by 14% in fiscal 2015 due to unfavorable currency impacts, revenue runoff in key accounts and weak growth in new and existing accounts, particularly in EMEA in the first half of fiscal 2015, partially offset by growth in SES revenue in the second half of fiscal 2015. Net revenue in Application and Business Services ("ABS") declined by 8% in fiscal 2015, due to unfavorable currency impacts and weak growth in new and existing accounts particularly in the first half of fiscal 2015, partially offset by growth in SES net revenue in the second half of fiscal 2015.

        ES earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased 1.7 percentage points in fiscal 2015. The increase in operating margin was due to an increase in gross margin and a decrease in


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. Gross margin increased due primarily to service delivery efficiencies and improving profit performance in underperforming contracts. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was primarily driven by lower field selling costs, which was due to favorable currency impacts and our sales transformation initiatives.

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        ES net revenue decreased 6.9% (decreased 6.8% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2014. Performance in ES remained challenged by the impact of several large contracts winding down and lower public sector spending in EMEA, particularly in the United Kingdom, and several other countries in EMEA. The net revenue decrease in ES was due primarily to revenue runoff in key accounts, weak growth in new and existing accounts, particularly in EMEA, and contractual price declines. These effects were partially offset by net revenue growth in our SES portfolio, which includes information management and analytics, security and cloud services. Net revenue in Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing ("ITO") decreased by 8% in fiscal 2014 due to revenue runoff in key accounts, weak growth in new and existing accounts, particularly in EMEA, and contractual price declines in ongoing contracts partially offset by growth in cloud and security revenue and favorable currency impacts. Net revenue in ABS decreased by 5% in fiscal 2014, due to revenue runoff in a key account, weak growth in new and existing accounts, particularly in EMEA, and unfavorable currency impacts, partially offset by growth in information management and analytics and cloud revenue.

        ES earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased 0.7 percentage points in fiscal 2014. The increase in operating margin was due to an increase in gross margin, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses as a percentagethe gains from the divestiture of net revenue. Grosscertain software assets. The gross margin increaseddecline was primarily due primarily to our continued focus on service delivery efficiencies, improving profit performance in under-performing contractsunfavorable foreign currency impacts and labor savings as a result of restructuring,supplies mix, partially offset by unfavorable impacts from revenue runoff in key accountsoperational improvements and weak growth in new and existing accounts. The increase in operatinga favorable mix of printers. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue wasdecreased primarily driven by the size of the revenue decline and higher administrative expenses and field selling costs. The increase in administrative expenses was due to the prior-year period containing higher bad debt recoveriesgains from the divestiture of certain software assets to Open Text Corporation and insurance recoveries. The increase in selling costs was the result of expanding the sales force coverage as we transition from a reactive sales model to a more proactive approach.

Software

cost-saving initiatives.
 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Net revenue

 $3,458 $3,701 $3,789 

Earnings from operations

 $760 $828 $848 

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

  22.0% 22.4% 22.4%

Fiscal 2015 compared with Fiscal 2014

        Software net revenue decreased 6.6% (decreased 2.7% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2015. Revenue growth in Software is being challenged by the overall market shift to SaaS solutions and related go-to-market sales execution challenges. Additionally, these challenges are impacting growth in



Table of Contents

Corporate Investments

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

license and support revenue. In fiscal 2015, net revenue growth was negatively impacted by foreign currency fluctuations across all regions, led primarily by weakness in the euro.

        In fiscal 2015, net revenue from licenses, professional services, SaaS and support decreased by 13%, 8%, 3% and 3%, respectively.

The decrease in license revenue was due primarily to the market shift to SaaS solutions and sales execution challenges and, as a result, we experienced lower revenue in IT Operations Management. Professional services net revenue decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts, our continued focus on higher-margin engagements, and, as a result, we experienced a net revenue decrease in big data solutions, partially offset by net revenue growth in security products. SaaS net revenue decreased due primarily to sales execution challenges, which resulted in lower revenue from big data solutions, partially offset by net revenue growth in IT Operations Management. The decrease in support revenue was due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts and past declines in license revenue, partially offset by growth in revenue for security products.

        In fiscal 2015, Software earningsloss from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.4 percentage pointsin Corporate Investments for the fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in gross margin and an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The decrease in gross margin was due primarily to a lower mix of license revenue. The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was due to the size of the revenue decline. During the period, operating expense declined due primarily to favorable currency impacts and lower SG&A expenses as a result of lower field selling costs driven by expense management.

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        Software net revenue decreased 2.3% (decreased 2.2% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2014. Revenue growth in Software was challenged by the overall market and customer shift to SaaS solutions, which is impacting growth in license and support revenue. In fiscal 2014, net revenue from licenses, support and professional services decreased by 3%, 2% and 6% respectively, while SaaS net revenue increased by 5%.

        The decline in license net revenue was due to the market and customer shift to SaaS solutions, which resulted in lower revenue from IT/cloud management and information management products, partially offset by strength in some of our key focus areas of big data analytics and security. The decrease in support net revenue was due to past declines in license revenue. Professional services net revenue decreased as we continued our focus on higher-margin engagements. These declines were partially offset by higher SaaS revenue due to improving demand for our SaaS solutions in IT/cloud management products and security products.

        In fiscal 2014, Software earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue remained flat in percentage points. There was an increase in gross margin, the effect of which was offset by an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The increase in gross margin was due to the shift to more profitable contracts and improved workforce utilization in professional services. The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was due primarily to investments in R&D partially offset by lower SG&A expenses due to cost savings associated with our ongoing restructuring efforts and improved operational expense management.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

HP Financial Services

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Net revenue

 $3,216 $3,498 $3,629 

Earnings from operations

 $349 $389 $399 

Earnings from operations as a % of net revenue

  10.9% 11.1% 11.0%

Fiscal 2015 compared with Fiscal 2014

        HPFS net revenue decreased by 8.1% (decreased 1.5% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2015 due primarily to unfavorable currency impacts led by weakness in the euro and lower asset management activity in customer buyouts.

        HPFS earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 0.2 percentage points in fiscal 2015 due primarily to decrease in gross margin while operating expense as a percentage of net revenue was flat in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The decrease in gross margin was due to unfavorable currency impacts, lower margins in customer buyouts, and lower portfolio margin due to competitive pricing, the effects of which were partially offset by higher margins from asset recovery services. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was flat as a result of lower SG&A expenses due primarily to lower field selling costs the effects of which were offset by size of the revenue decline.

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        HPFS net revenue decreased by 3.6% (decreased 3.3% on a constant currency basis) in fiscal 2014 due primarily to lower portfolio revenue from lower average portfolio assets and lower asset management activity, primarily in customer buyouts.

        HPFS earnings from operations as a percentage of net revenue increased by 0.1 percentage points in fiscal 2014. The increase was due primarily to an increase in gross margin, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue. The increase in gross margin was the result of a higher portfolio margin, primarily from lower bad debt expense and a lower cost of funds and improved margins in remarketing sales. The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue was due primarily to higher go-to-market investments.

Financing Volume

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Total financing volume

 $6,504 $6,425 $5,603 

        New financing volume, which represent the amount of financing provided to customers for equipment and related software and services, including intercompany activity, increased 1.2% in fiscal 2015 and 14.7% in fiscal 2014, respectively. The increase in both fiscal 2015 and 2014 was driven by higher financing associated with product sales and related services offerings. The increase in fiscal 2015 was partially offset by unfavorable currency impacts led by weakness in the euro.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Portfolio Assets and Ratios

        The HPFS business model is asset intensive and uses certain internal metrics to measure its performance against other financial services companies, including a segment balance sheet that is derived from our internal management reporting system. The accounting policies used to derive HPFS amounts are substantially the same as those used by HP. However, intercompany loans and certain accounts that are reflected in the segment balances are eliminated in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

        The portfolio assets and ratios derived from the segment balance sheet for HPFS were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Financing receivables, gross

 $6,689 $6,670 

Net equipment under operating leases

  2,710  2,595 

Capitalized profit on intercompany equipment transactions(1)

  873  783 

Intercompany leases(1)

  2,195  2,199 

Gross portfolio assets

  12,467  12,247 

Allowance for doubtful accounts(2)

  95  111 

Operating lease equipment reserve

  58  68 

Total reserves

  153  179 

Net portfolio assets

 $12,314 $12,068 

Reserve coverage

  1.2% 1.5%

Debt-to-equity ratio(3)

  7.0x  7.0x 

(1)
Intercompany activity is eliminated in consolidation.

(2)
Allowance for doubtful accounts for financing receivables includes both the short- and long-term portions.

(3)
Debt attributable to HPFS consists of intercompany equity that is treated as debt for segment reporting purposes, intercompany debt, and borrowing- and funding-related activity associated with HPFS and its subsidiaries. Debt attributable to HPFS totaled $10.7 billion at both October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014. HPFS equity at both October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014 was $1.5 billion. We believe the HPFS debt-to-equity ratio is comparable to that of other similar financing companies.

        At October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, HPFS cash and cash equivalents and short term investments were $589 million and $952 million, respectively.

        Net portfolio assets at October 31, 2015 increased 2% from October 31, 2014. The increase generally resulted from new financing volume partially offset by portfolio runoff and unfavorable currency impacts.

        HPFS recorded net bad debt expense and operating lease equipment reserves of $46 million, $40 million, and $50 million in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Corporate Investments

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Dollars in millions
 

Net revenue

 $27 $302 $24 

Loss from operations

 $(565)$(199)$(316)

Loss from operations as a % of net revenue(1)

  NM  (66.0)% NM 

(1)
"NM" represents not meaningful.

Fiscal 2015 compared with Fiscal 2014

        The revenue decrease for fiscal 2015 was due primarily to the sale of IP related to the Palm acquisition in the prior-year period.

        The increase in the loss from operations for fiscal 2015 was due primarily to the sale of IP in the prior-year period and higher expenses from enterprise-related business incubation activitiesprojects and HP Labs.

Fiscal 2014 compared with Fiscal 2013

        The revenue increase for fiscal 2014 was due primarily to the sale of IP related to the Palm acquisition.

        The decrease in the loss from operations for fiscal 2014 was due primarily to the sale of IP, the benefits of which were partially offset by higher expenses associated with enterprise-related business incubation activities, corporate strategy, HP Labs and global alliances.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We use cash generated by operations as our primary source of liquidity. We believe that internally generated cash flows are generally sufficient to support our operating businesses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, restructuring activities, principal and interest payment ofmaturing debt, income tax payments and the payment of stockholder dividends, in addition to investments and share repurchases. We are

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



able to supplement this short-term liquidity, if necessary, with broad access to capital markets and credit facilities made available by various domestic and foreign financial institutions. OurWhile our access to capital markets may be constrained and our cost of borrowing may increase under certain business, market and economic conditions; however,conditions, our access to a variety of funding sources to meet our liquidity needs is designed to facilitate continued access to capital resources under all such conditions. Our liquidity is subject to various risks including the risks identified in the section entitled "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” in Item 1A and market risks identified in the section entitled "Quantitative“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk"Risk” in Item 7A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Our cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the world, with substantially allthe majority of those amounts held outside of the U.S.United States. We utilize a variety of planning and financing strategies in an effort to ensure that our worldwide cash is available when and where it is needed. Our cash position remains strong, and we expect that our cash balances, anticipated cash flow generated from operations and access to capital markets will be sufficient to cover our expected near-term cash outlays.


TableOn November 1, 2017, HP made a cash payment of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis$1.1 billion to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in connection with the acquisition of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

its printer business.

Amounts held outside of the U.S.United States are generally utilized to support non-U.S. liquidity needs, although a portion of those amounts may from time to time be subject to short-term intercompany loans into the U.S.United States. Most of the amounts held outside of the U.S.United States could be repatriated to the U.S.United States but, under current law, some would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. Repatriation of some foreign earnings is restricted by local law. Except for foreign earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S.,United States, we have provided for the U.S. federal tax liability on these earnings for financial statement purposes. Repatriation could result in additional income tax payments in future years. Where local restrictions prevent an efficient intercompany transfer of funds, our intent is that cash balances would remain outside of the U.S.United States and we would meet liquidity needs through ongoing cash flows, external borrowings, or both. We do not expect restrictions or potential taxes incurred on repatriation of amounts held outside ofrepatriated to the U.S.United States to have a material effect on our overall liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

        In connection with the Separation, we reviewed our capital structure during fiscal 2015 to ensure that each company, HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, would be well capitalized after the Separation. In October 2015, prior to the Separation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise completed its offering of $14.6 billion senior unsecured notes and we redeemed and paid $6.6 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes as a result of early extinguishment of debt. In connection with our ongoing operations and in part due to the Separation, we repaid a short-term loan of $3.5 billion, issued $18.2 billion and repaid $18.4 billion of commercial paper in fiscal 2015. On November 4, 2015, we incrementally redeemed and paid $2.1 billion U.S. Dollar Global Notes as part of the final settlement of the debt redemption issued as a part of the Separation.

Liquidity

Our cash and cash equivalents, marketable debt securities and total debt and available borrowing resourcesfor continuing operations were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In billions
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $17.4 $15.1 $12.2 

Total debt

 $24.7 $19.5 $22.6 

Available borrowing resources(1)

 $19.0 $17.8 $17.8 

(1)
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In billions
Cash and cash equivalents$7.0
 $6.3
 $7.6
Marketable debt securities(1)
$1.1
 $
 $
Total debt$7.8
 $6.8
 $8.8
(1)
Includes highly liquid U.S. treasury notes, U.S. agency securities, non-U.S. government bonds, corporate debt securities, money market and other funds. We classify these investments within Other current assets in Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations.
Our historical statements of cash flows represent the combined cash flows and key cash flow metrics of HP prior to the Separation and have not been revised to reflect the effect of the Separation. For morefurther information on our available borrowing resources,discontinued operations, see Note 13 to17, “Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Our key cash flow metrics were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $6,490 $12,333 $11,608 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (5,534) (2,792) (2,803)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  1,344  (6,571) (7,943)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 $2,300 $2,970 $862 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
   In millions  
Net cash provided by operating activities$3,677
 $3,252
 $7,026
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,717) 48
 (5,534)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,251) (14,445) 808
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$709
 $(11,145) $2,300

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)




Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $0.4 billion for fiscal year 2017 as compared to fiscal year 2016.The increase was primarily due to higher cash generated from working capital management activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $5.8$3.8 billion for fiscal 2015year 2016 as compared to fiscal 2014. The decrease was due primarily to lower cash generated from working capital management activities, payments for separation costs, lower cash receipts from contract manufacturers and financing receivables, loweryear 2015, since the net earnings in the current period, unfavorable currency impacts, as well as higher cash payments for prepaids and employee benefits. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $0.7 billion for fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013, due primarily to improvements in working capital management.

        Our key working capital metrics were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 

Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable

  47  44  49 

Days of supply in inventory

  30  27  24 

Days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable

  (74) (67) (56)

Cash conversion cycle

  3  4  17 

        Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable ("DSO") measures the average number of days our receivables are outstanding. DSO is calculated by dividing ending accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, by a 90-day average of net revenue. For fiscalyear 2015 the increase in DSO was due primarily to lower usage of cash discounts by our customers and longer standard payment terms for Aruba. For fiscal 2014, the decrease in DSO was due primarily toincluded the impact of currency anddiscontinued operations, which is not included in the expansion of our factoring programs.

        Days of supply in inventory ("DOS") measures the average number of days from procurement to sale of our product. DOS is calculatednet cash provided by dividing ending inventory byoperating activities for fiscal year 2016, as a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal 2015, the increase in DOS was due to higher inventory balance to support future sales levels. For fiscal 2014, the increase in DOS was due to a higher inventory balance in Personal Systems due in part to strategic and advanced buys.

        Days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable ("DPO") measures the average number of days our accounts payable balances are outstanding. DPO is calculated by dividing ending accounts payable by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal 2015, the increase in DPO was primarily the result of purchasing linearity and an extension of payment terms withthe Separation.

Working Capital Metrics
Management utilizes current cash conversion cycle information to manage our product suppliers. For fiscal 2014,working capital level. The table below presents the increase in DPO was primarily the result of an extension of payment terms with our product suppliers.

cash conversion cycle: 

 As of October 31
 2017
2016
2015
Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”)29

30

35
Days of supply in inventory (“DOS”)46

39

39
Days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable (“DPO”)(105)
(98)
(93)
Cash conversion cycle(30)
(29)
(19)
The cash conversion cycle is the sum of days of DSO and DOS less DPO. Items which may cause the cash conversion cycle in a particular period to differ from a long-term sustainable rate include, but are not limited to, changes in business mix, changes in payment terms, extent of receivables factoring, seasonal trends and the timing of revenue recognition and inventory purchases within the period.

DSO measures the average number of days our receivables are outstanding. DSO is calculated by dividing ending accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, by a 90-day average of net revenue. For fiscal year 2017, the decrease in DSO compared to fiscal year 2016 was primarily due to strong collections. For fiscal year 2016, the decrease in DSO compared to fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to favorable revenue linearity and strong collections, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
DOS measures the average number of days from procurement to sale of our product. DOS is calculated by dividing ending inventory by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal year 2017, the DOS was higher primarily due to leveraging our balance sheet, particularly through higher strategic buys and sea shipments to better assure supply of commodities in short supply. For fiscal year 2016, the DOS was flat compared to fiscal year 2015 due to strong inventory management offset by higher inventory balance to support future sales levels.
DPO measures the average number of days our accounts payable balances are outstanding. DPO is calculated by dividing ending accounts payable by a 90-day average of cost of goods sold. For fiscal year 2017, the DPO was higher primarily due to increased inventory purchases and an extension of payment terms with our product suppliers. For fiscal year 2016, the increase in DPO compared to fiscal year 2015 was primarily the result of an extension of payment terms with our product suppliers and increased strategic inventory purchases. 
Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by approximately $2.7$1.8 billion for fiscal 2015year 2017 as compared to fiscal 2014,year 2016, primarily due primarily to the acquisitionnet investment activity of Aruba. $1.1 billion, classified as available-for-sale investments within Other current assets, collateral of $0.2 billion related to our derivatives and proceeds from a business divestiture of $0.5 billion in fiscal year 2016.
Net cash used in investing activities


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

was flat decreased by $5.6 billion for fiscal 2014year 2016 as compared to fiscal 2013,year 2015, due primarily to highercapital expenditures and payments made in connection with business acquisitions, net of cash utilization for purchases of property, plant and equipment offset by cash generated from sales of available-for-sale securities.

Financing Activities

        Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 billionacquired, in fiscal 2015 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $6.6 billion in fiscal 2014. The change was due primarily to proceeds from the issuance of senior unsecured notes in Octoberyear 2015 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in principal amount of $14.6 billion and higher proceeds from issuance of commercial paper, partially offset by the repayment as a result of early debt extinguishment of $6.6 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes and higher repayment of commercial paper as compared to fiscal 2014. discontinued operations.

Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by approximately $1.4$13.2 billion forin fiscal 2014 asyear 2017 compared to fiscal 2013 due primarilyyear 2016, as the net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year 2016 included the cash transfer of $10.4 billion to proceeds fromHewlett Packard Enterprise in connection with the issuanceSeparation and the redemption of $2.1 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes, and fiscal year 2017 included a higher outstanding of commercial paper of $0.9 billion.
Net cash used in January 2014, partially offsetfinancing activities increased by higher debt repayments$15.2 billion in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015, primarily due to the cash transfer of $10.4 billion to Hewlett Packard Enterprise in connection with the Separation, the redemption of $2.1 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes and cash utilization of $2.0 billion for repurchases of common stock. For more information on our share repurchase programs, see Item 5stock and Note 13 to the Consolidated dividends. 

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Statements in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)




Capital Resources

Debt Levels


 As of October 31 As of October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015

 Dollars in millions
 Dollars in millions

Short-term debt

 $2,885 $3,486 $5,979 $1,072
 $78
 $2,194

Long-term debt

 $21,780 $16,039 $16,608 $6,747
 $6,735
 $6,648

Debt-to-equity ratio

 0.88x 0.72x 0.82x (2.29)x
 (1.75)x
 0.31x

Weighted-average interest rate

 3.4% 2.7% 3.0%4.0% 4.2% 3.7%

We maintain debt levels that we establish through consideration of a number of factors, including cash flow expectations, cash requirements for operations, investment plans (including acquisitions), share repurchase activities, our cost of capital and targeted capital structure.

Short-term debt decreased by $601 million and long-term debt increased by approximately $5.7$1.0 billion for fiscal 2015year 2017 as compared to fiscal 2014.year 2016. The net increase in total debt was primarily due primarily to issuance of senior unsecured notes in October 2015 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in principal amount of $14.6 billion which includes of $14.0 billion fixed rate notes and $600 million of floating rate notes, partially offset by the payment as a result of early debt extinguishment of $6.6 billion in connection with the Separation, maturities of $2.5 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes and repayment of $3.5 billion of short-term loan. We also issued $18.2 billion and repaid $18.4 billionhigher outstanding of commercial paper in fiscal 2015. On November 4, 2015, we paidof $0.9 billion.
Short-term debt decreased by $2.1 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes as part of the final settlement of the debt redemption issued as a part of the Separation.

        Short-term debt and long-term debt decreasedincreased by approximately $2.5$0.1 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively, for fiscal 2014year 2016 as compared to fiscal 2013.year 2015. The net decrease in total debt was primarily due primarily to maturitiesthe redemption of debt. During fiscal 2014, we issued $2.0$2.1 billion of fixed rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes under the 2012 Shelf Registration Statement which mature in 2019 and repaid $4.9 billion of U.S. Dollar Global Notes. We also issued $11.6 billion and repaid $11.5 billion of commercial paper in fiscal 2014.

November 2015.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Our debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as the carrying amount of debt divided by total stockholders'stockholders’ (deficit) equity. Our debt-to-equity ratio increased by 0.16x0.54x in fiscal 2015,year 2017 compared to fiscal year 2016, due to an increase in total debt balances of $5.1 billion partially offset by an increase in stockholders' equity by $1.0 billion at the end of fiscal 2015. billion.

Our debt-to-equity ratio decreased by 0.10x2.06x in fiscal 2014,year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015, primarily due to a decrease in total debt balancesnegative equity resulting from the transfer of $3.1net assets of $32.5 billion partially offset by a decrease in stockholders' equity by $0.5to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the redemption of $2.1 billion atof fixed-rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes due to the endSeparation.
During fiscal year 2017 and 2016, we generated operating cash flow of fiscal 2014.

$3.7 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively.

Our weighted-average interest rate reflects the effective interest rate on our borrowings prevailing during the period and reflects the effect of interest rate swaps. For more information on our interest rate swaps, see Note 1310, “Financial Instruments” in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.
Available Borrowing Resources

We had the following resources available to obtain short or long-term financing:
 As of October 31, 2017
 In millions
2016 Shelf Registration StatementUnspecified
Uncommitted lines of credit$846
As of October 31, 2017, we maintain a senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $4.0 billion, which will be available until April 2, 2019 and is primarily to support the issuance of commercial paper. Funds borrowed under this revolving credit facility may also be used for general corporate purposes.
We increased our issuance authorization under our commercial paper program from $4.0 billion to $6.0 billion in November 2017. In December 2017, we also entered into a revolving credit facility with certain institutional lenders that provides us with $1.5 billion of available borrowings until November 30, 2018.
For more information on our borrowings, see Note 11, “Borrowings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Available Borrowing Resources

        We had the following resources available to obtain short- or long-term financing if we need additional liquidity:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 
 
 In millions
 

Commercial paper programs

 $16,461 

Uncommitted lines of credit

 $2,524 

        For more information on our available borrowings resources, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Credit Ratings

Our credit risk is evaluated by major independent rating agencies based upon publicly available information as well as information obtained in our ongoing discussions with them. While we do not have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity of a material amount of our debt, previous downgrades have increased the cost of borrowing under our credit facilities, have reduced market capacity for our commercial paper and have required the posting of additional collateral under some of our derivative contracts. In addition, any further downgrade to our credit ratings by any rating agencies may further impact us in a similar manner, and, depending on the extent of any such downgrade, could have a negative impact on

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



our liquidity and capital position. We can rely onaccess alternative sources of funding, including drawdowns under our credit facilities, if necessary, to offset potential reductions in the market capacity for our commercial paper.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)




CONTRACTUAL AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

        The

Our contractual and other obligations for HP (including Hewlett Packard Enterprise) as of October 31, 2015,2017, were as follows:

 
  
 Payments Due by Period 
 
 Total 1 Year or
Less
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than
5 Years
 
 
 In millions
 

Principal payments on debt(1)

 $24,538 $2,860 $5,635 $3,409 $12,634 

Interest payments on debt(2)

  8,445  721  1,344  1,147  5,233 

Operating lease obligations(3)

  2,791  603  870  527  791 

Purchase obligations(4)

  2,654  1,126  944  451  133 

Capital lease obligations

  104  28  51  8  17 

Total(5)(6)(7)(8)

 $38,532 $5,338 $8,844 $5,542 $18,808 

(1)
   Payments Due by Period
 Total 
1 Year or
Less
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years
 In millions
Principal payments on debt(1)
$7,507
 $984
 $414
 $4,899
 $1,210
Interest payments on debt(2)
2,518
 286
 549
 323
 1,360
Purchase obligations(3)
1,208
 728
 405
 73
 2
Operating lease obligations(4)
1,057
 248
 301
 156
 352
Capital lease obligations(5)
374
 102
 190
 73
 9
Total(6)(7)(8)
$12,664
 $2,348
 $1,859
 $5,524
 $2,933
(1)
Amounts represent the principal cash payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt and do not include any fair value adjustments, discounts or premiums.
(2)
Amounts represent the expected interest payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt. We have outstanding interest rate swap agreements accounted for as fair value hedges that have the economic effect of changing fixed interest rates associated with some of our U.S. Dollar Global Notes to variable interest rates. The impact of our outstanding interest rate swaps at October 31, 2017 was factored into the calculation of the future interest payments on debt.
(3)
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. These purchase obligations are related principally to inventory and other items. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Purchase obligations also exclude open purchase orders that are routine arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business as they are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way. Even though open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust terms based on our business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services.
(4)
Amounts represent the operating lease obligations, net of total sublease income of $174 million.
(5)
Amounts represent the capital lease obligations, including total capital lease interest obligations of $45 million.
(6)
Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Contributions. In fiscal year 2018, we anticipate making contributions of approximately $24 million to non-U.S. pension plans, $33 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified pension plan participants and $7 million to cover benefit claims for our short-term and long-term debt and do not include any fair value adjustments, discounts or premiums. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects the total future principal payments on debt to be approximately $8.7 billion.

(2)
Amounts represent the expected interest payments relating to our short-term and long-term debt. We have outstanding interest rate swap agreements accounted for as fair value hedges that have the economic effect of changing fixed interest rates associated with some of our U.S. Dollar Global Notes to variable interest rates. The impact of our outstanding interest rate swaps at October 31, 2015 was factored into the calculation of the future interest payments on debt. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects the total future interest payments on debt to be approximately $2.9 billion.

(3)
Amounts represent the operating lease obligations net of total sublease income of $77 million. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects the total remaining future minimum operating lease commitments to be approximately $367 million, net of sublease income of $118 million.

(4)
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. These purchase obligations are related principally to inventory and other items. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Purchase obligations also exclude open purchase orders that are routine arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business as they are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way. Even though open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust terms based on our business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects the total remaining future unconditional purchase obligations to be approximately $915 million.

(5)
Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Contributions.    As of October 31, 2015, HP (including Hewlett Packard Enterprise) expects to contribute approximately $384 million to its non-U.S. pension plans, approximately $37 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and approximately $46 million to cover benefit claims for HP's post-retirement benefit plans in fiscal 2016. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects to contribute approximately

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

    $18 million to its non-U.S. pension plans, approximately $36 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and approximately $43 million to cover benefit claims for HP's post-retirement benefit plans. Our policy is to fund our pension plans so that we meet at least the minimum contribution requirements, as established by local government, funding and taxing authorities. Expected contributions and payments to our pension and post-retirement benefit plans are excluded from the contractual obligations table because they do not represent contractual cash outflows as they are dependent on numerous factors which may result in a wide range of outcomes. For more information on our retirement and post-retirement benefit plans, see Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(7)
Cost Savings Plans. We expect to make future cash payments of between $173 million and $323 million in connection with our cost savings plans through fiscal year 2021. These payments have been excluded from the contractual obligations table, because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these payments. For more information on our restructuring activities that are part of our cost improvements, see Note 3, “Restructuring and Other Charges”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(8)
Uncertain Tax Positions. As of October 31, 2017, we had approximately $2.1 billion of recorded liabilities and related interest and penalties pertaining to uncertain tax positions. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlement with the tax authorities might occur due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters. Payments of these obligations would result from settlements with taxing authorities. For more information on our uncertain tax positions,

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)



see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(6)
Restructuring Plans.    As of October 31, 2015, HP (including Hewlett Packard Enterprise) expects future cash payments of approximately $3.2 billion in connection with our approved restructuring plans which includes $1.3 billion expected to be paid in fiscal 2016 with the remaining approximately $1.9 billion cash payments to be made through fiscal 2025. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects future cash payments of approximately $280 million in connection with our approved restructuring plans which includes $90 million expected to be paid in fiscal 2016 with the remaining approximately $190 million cash payments to be made through fiscal 2025. Payments for restructuring have been excluded from the contractual obligations table, because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these payments. For more information on our restructuring activities, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.


(7)
Separation Costs.    As of October 31, 2015, HP (including Hewlett Packard Enterprise) expects future cash payments of approximately $750 million in connection with our separation charges and net foreign tax payments, which are expected to be paid in fiscal 2016, with subsequent tax credit amounts expected over later years. As of October 31, 2015, we also expect separation-related capital expenditures of approximately $60 million in fiscal 2016. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects future cash payments of approximately $180 million in connection with our separation charges and net foreign tax payments, which are expected to be paid in fiscal 2016, with subsequent tax credit amounts expected over later years. As of October 31, 2015, HP Inc. also expects separation-related capital expenditures of approximately $30 million in fiscal 2016. Payments for separation costs have been excluded from the contractual obligations table, because they do not represent contractual cash outflows and there is uncertainty as to the timing of these payments.

(8)
Uncertain Tax Positions.    As of October 31, 2015, we had approximately $3.7 billion of recorded liabilities and related interest and penalties pertaining to uncertain tax positions. These liabilities and related interest and penalties include $15 million expected to be paid within one year. For the remaining amount, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlement with the tax authorities might occur due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters. Payments of these obligations would result from settlements with taxing authorities. For more information on our uncertain tax positions, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As part of our ongoing business, we have not participated in transactions that generate material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

We have third-party short-term financing arrangements intended to facilitate the working capital requirements of certain customers. The total aggregate maximum capacity of the financing arrangements was $3.3 billion as of October 31, 2015, including an aggregate maximum capacity of $1.4 billion in non-recourse financing arrangements and an aggregate maximum capacity of $1.9 billion in partial-recourse facilities. For more information on our third-party revolving short-term financing arrangements, see Note 7 “Supplementary Financial Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference.




ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks that could impact our financial position and results of operations. Our risk management strategy with respect to these market risks may include the use of derivative financial instruments. We use derivative contracts only to manage existing underlying exposures. Accordingly, we do not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. Our risks, risk management strategy and a sensitivity analysis estimating the effects of changes in fair value for each of these exposures isare outlined below.

Actual gains and losses in the future may differ materially from the sensitivity analyses based on changes in the timing and amount of foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate movements and our actual exposures and derivatives in place at the time of the change, as well as the effectiveness of the derivative to hedge the related exposure.

Foreign currency exchange rate risk

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales, anticipated purchases and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We transact business in approximately 7944 currencies worldwide, of which the most significant foreign currencies to our operations for fiscal 2015year 2017 were the euro, Chinese yuan renminbi, the British pound Chinese yuan renminbi and the Japanese yen.Indian rupee. For most currencies, we are a net receiver of the foreign currency and therefore benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. Even where we are a net receiver of the foreign currency, a weaker U.S. dollar may adversely affect certain expense figures, if taken alone.

We use a combination of forward contracts and at times, options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in our forecasted net revenue and, to a lesser extent in cost of sales and intercompany loans denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.sales. In addition, when debt is denominated in a foreign currency, we may use swaps to exchange the foreign currency principal and interest obligations for U.S. dollar-denominated amounts to manage the exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consisting primarily of forward contracts to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. Alternatively, we may choose not to hedge the risk associated with our foreign currency exposures, primarily if such exposure acts as a natural hedge for offsetting amounts denominated in the same currency or if the currency is too difficult or too expensive to hedge.

We have performed sensitivity analyses for continuing operations as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, with all other variables held constant. The analyses cover all of our foreign currency derivative contracts offset by underlying exposures. The foreign currency exchange rates we used in performing the sensitivity analysis were based on market rates in effect at October 31, 20152017 and 2014.2016. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would result in a foreign exchange fair value loss of $72$64 million and $62$41 million at October 31, 20152017 and October 31, 2014,2016, respectively.

Interest rate risk

We also are exposed to interest rate risk related to debt we have issued and our investment portfolio and financing receivables.

portfolio.

We issue long-term debt in either U.S. dollars or foreign currencies based on market conditions at the time of financing. We often use interest rate and/or currency swaps to modify the market risk exposures in connection with the debt to achieve U.S. dollar LIBOR-based floating interest expense.


Table of Contents

The swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed for floating interest payments. However, we may choose not to swap fixed for floating interest payments or may terminate a previously executed swap if we believe a larger proportion of fixed-rate debt would be beneficial.

In order to hedge the fair value of certain fixed-rate investments, we may enter into interest rate swaps that convert fixed interest returns into variable interest returns. We may use cash flow hedges to hedge the variability of LIBOR-based interest income received on certain variable-rate investments. We may also enter into interest rate swaps that convert variable rate interest returns into fixed-rate interest returns.

We have performed sensitivity analyses as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, using a modeling technique that measures the change in the fair values arising from a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the levels of interest rates across the entire yield curve, with all other variables held constant. The analyses cover our debt, investments financing receivables and interest rate swaps. The analyses use actual or approximate maturities for the debt, investments financing receivables and interest rate swaps. The discount rates used were based on the market interest rates in effect at October 31, 20152017 and 2014.2016. The sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates would resulthave resulted in a loss in the fair values of our debt investments and financing receivables,investments, net of interest rate swaps, of $119$61 million at October 31, 20152017 and $80$51 million at October 31, 2014.


2016.



ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


Table of Contents


Page
Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity

(Deficit)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2: Segment Information

Note 3: Restructuring

and Other Charges

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings

Note 7: Balance Sheet Details

Supplementary Financial Information

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases

Goodwill

Note 9: Acquisitions and Divestitures

Fair Value

Note 10: Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Financial Instruments

Note 11: Fair Value

Borrowings

Note 12: Financial Instruments

Stockholders’ Deficit

Note 13: Borrowings


158

Note 14: Stockholders' Equity


163

Note 15: Net Earnings Per Share

Note 16:14: Litigation and Contingencies

Note 17:15: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of HP Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HP Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders'stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2015.2017. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of HP Inc. and subsidiaries at October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2015,2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), HP Inc.'s and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated December 16, 201514, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
December 16, 2015


14, 2017



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of HP Inc.

We have audited HP Inc.'s and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). HP Inc.'s and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, HP Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HP Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders'stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 20152017 and our report dated December 16, 201514, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
December 16, 2015


14, 2017


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        HP's

HP’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for HP. HP'sHP’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. HP'sHP’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of HP; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of HP are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of HP; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of HP'sHP’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        HP's

HP’s management assessed the effectiveness of HP'sHP’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2017, utilizing the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on the assessment by HP'sHP’s management, we determined that HP'sHP’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2015.2017. The effectiveness of HP'sHP’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 20152017 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, HP'sHP’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on page 8654 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ DION J. WEISLER

/s/ CATHERINE A. LESJAK
Dion J. Weisler
President and Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 201514, 2017
 /s/ CATHERINE A. LESJAK

Catherine A. Lesjak
Chief Financial Officer
December 16, 201514, 2017


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions, except per share amounts
 

Net revenue:

          

Products

 $69,032 $73,726 $72,398 

Services

  33,962  37,327  39,453 

Financing income

  361  401  447 

Total net revenue

  103,355  111,454  112,298 

Costs and expenses:

          

Cost of products

  53,081  56,469  55,632 

Cost of services

  25,275  28,093  30,436 

Financing interest

  240  277  312 

Research and development

  3,502  3,447  3,135 

Selling, general and administrative

  12,185  13,353  13,267 

Amortization of intangible assets

  931  1,000  1,373 

Restructuring charges

  1,017  1,619  990 

Acquisition and other related charges

  90  11  22 

Separation costs

  1,259     

Defined benefit plan settlement charges

  168     

Impairment of data center assets

  136     

Total operating expenses

  97,884  104,269  105,167 

Earnings from operations

  5,471  7,185  7,131 

Interest and other, net

  (739) (628) (621)

Earnings before taxes

  4,732  6,557  6,510 

Provision for taxes

  (178) (1,544) (1,397)

Net earnings

 $4,554 $5,013 $5,113 

Net earnings per share:

          

Basic

 $2.51 $2.66 $2.64 

Diluted

 $2.48 $2.62 $2.62 

Weighted average shares used to compute net earnings per share:

          

Basic

  1,814  1,882  1,934 

Diluted

  1,836  1,912  1,950 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions, except per share amounts
Net revenue$52,056
 $48,238
 $51,463
Costs and expenses: 
  
  
Cost of revenue42,478
 39,240
 41,524
Research and development1,190
 1,209
 1,191
Selling, general and administrative4,376
 3,833
 4,719
Restructuring and other charges362
 205
 63
Acquisition-related charges125
 7
 1
Amortization of intangible assets1
 16
 102
Defined benefit plan settlement charges (credits)5
 179
 (57)
Total costs and expenses48,537
 44,689
 47,543
Earnings from continuing operations3,519
 3,549
 3,920
Interest and other, net(243) 212
 (388)
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes3,276
 3,761
 3,532
(Provision for) benefit from taxes(750) (1,095) 186
Net earnings from continuing operations2,526
 2,666
 3,718
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations
 (170) 836
Net earnings$2,526
 $2,496
 $4,554
Net earnings per share: 
  
  
Basic 
  
  
Continuing operations$1.50
 $1.54
 $2.05
Discontinued operations
 (0.10) 0.46
Total basic net earnings per share$1.50
 $1.44
 $2.51
Diluted 
  
  
Continuing operations$1.48
 $1.53
 $2.02
Discontinued operations
 (0.10) 0.46
Total diluted net earnings per share$1.48
 $1.43
 $2.48
Weighted-average shares used to compute net earnings per share: 
  
  
Basic1,688
 1,730
 1,814
Diluted1,702
 1,743
 1,836


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 
 For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Net earnings

 $4,554 $5,013 $5,113 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes:

          

Change in unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities:

          

Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period

  (17) 7  52 

Gains reclassified into earnings

    (1) (49)

  (17) 6  3 

Change in unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges:

          

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

  1,091  337  (243)

(Gains) losses reclassified into earnings

  (1,312) 151  106 

  (221) 488  (137)

Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:

          

(Losses) gains arising during the period

  (548) (2,756) 1,953 

Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit

  443  259  326 

Curtailments, settlements and other

  115  51  25 

  10  (2,446) 2,304 

Change in cumulative translation adjustment

  (207) (85) (150)

Other comprehensive (loss) income before taxes

  (435) (2,037) 2,020 

Benefit (provision) for taxes

  14  (66) (239)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes

  (421) (2,103) 1,781 

Comprehensive income

 $4,133 $2,910 $6,894 

For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017
2016
2015
 In millions
Net earnings$2,526

$2,496

$4,554
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes: 

 

 
Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale securities: 

 

 
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period4

1

(17)









Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: 

 

 
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period(651)
199

1,091
Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings199

63

(1,312)
 (452)
262

(221)
Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: 

 

 
Gains (losses) arising during the period455

(759)
(548)
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit74

51

443
Curtailments, settlements and other3

183

115
 532

(525)
10
Change in cumulative translation adjustment



(207)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes84

(262)
(435)
(Provision for) benefit from taxes(64)
45

14
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes20

(217)
(421)
Comprehensive income$2,546

$2,279

$4,133


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions, except
par value

 

ASSETS

       

Current assets:

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $17,433 $15,133 

Accounts receivable

  13,363  13,832 

Financing receivables

  2,918  2,946 

Inventory

  6,485  6,415 

Other current assets

  11,588  11,819 

Total current assets

  51,787  50,145 

Property, plant and equipment

  11,090  11,340 

Long-term financing receivables and other assets

  9,050  8,454 

Goodwill

  32,941  31,139 

Intangible assets

  2,014  2,128 

Total assets

 $106,882 $103,206 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

       

Current liabilities:

       

Notes payable and short-term borrowings

 $2,885 $3,486 

Accounts payable

  15,956  15,903 

Employee compensation and benefits

  3,608  4,209 

Taxes on earnings

  830  1,017 

Deferred revenue

  6,199  6,143 

Accrued restructuring

  689  898 

Other accrued liabilities

  12,024  12,079 

Total current liabilities

  42,191  43,735 

Long-term debt

  21,780  16,039 

Other liabilities

  14,760  16,305 

Commitments and contingencies

       

Stockholders' equity:

       

HP stockholders' equity

       

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value (300 shares authorized; none issued)

     

Common stock, $0.01 par value (9,600 shares authorized; 1,804 and 1,839 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively)

  18  18 

Additional paid-in capital

  1,963  3,430 

Retained earnings

  32,089  29,164 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (6,302) (5,881)

Total HP stockholders' equity

  27,768  26,731 

Non-controlling interests

  383  396 

Total stockholders' equity

  28,151  27,127 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $106,882 $103,206 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions, except par value
ASSETS 
  
Current assets: 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$6,997
 $6,288
Accounts receivable4,414
 4,114
Inventory5,786
 4,484
Other current assets5,121
 3,582
Total current assets22,318
 18,468
Property, plant and equipment1,878
 1,736
Goodwill5,622
 5,622
Other non-current assets3,095
 3,161
Total assets$32,913
 $28,987
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT 
  
Current liabilities: 
  
Notes payable and short-term borrowings$1,072
 $78
Accounts payable13,279
 11,103
Employee compensation and benefits894
 759
Taxes on earnings214
 231
Deferred revenue1,012
 919
Other accrued liabilities5,941
 5,718
Total current liabilities22,412
 18,808
Long-term debt6,747
 6,735
Other non-current liabilities7,162
 7,333
Commitments and contingencies

 

Stockholders’ deficit:

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value (300 shares authorized; none issued)
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value (9,600 shares authorized; 1,650 and 1,712 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2017, and 2016 respectively)16
 17
Additional paid in capital380
 1,030
Retained deficit(2,386) (3,498)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,418) (1,438)
Total stockholders’ deficit(3,408) (3,889)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit$32,913
 $28,987


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


 For the fiscal years ended October 31 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015

 In millions
 In millions

Cash flows from operating activities:

        
  
  

Net earnings

 $4,554 $5,013 $5,113 $2,526
 $2,496
 $4,554

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

        
  
  

Depreciation and amortization

 4,061 4,334 4,611 354
 332
 4,061

Stock-based compensation expense

 709 560 500 224
 182
 709

Provision for doubtful accounts

 71 55 61 

Provision for inventory

 305 211 275 

Restructuring charges

 1,017 1,619 990 
Restructuring and other charges362
 200
 1,017

Deferred taxes on earnings

 (700) (34) (410)238
 401
 (700)

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 (145) (58) (2)

Other, net

 1,031 81 443 134
 (32) 1,426

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

       

  
  

Accounts receivable

 572 2,017 530 (453) 565
 572

Financing receivables

 (65) 420 484 

Inventory

 (330) (580) (4)(1,346) (291) (330)

Accounts payable

 31 1,912 541 2,161
 928
 31

Taxes on earnings

 (137) 310 417 73
 106
 (137)

Restructuring

 (1,243) (1,506) (904)
Restructuring and other(233) (157) (1,243)

Other assets and liabilities

 (3,241) (2,021) (1,037)(363) (1,478) (2,934)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 6,490 12,333 11,608 3,677
 3,252
 7,026

Cash flows from investing activities:

        
  
  

Investment in property, plant and equipment

 (3,603) (3,853) (3,199)(402) (433) (3,603)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 424 843 653 69
 6
 424

Purchases of available-for-sale securities and other investments

 (259) (1,086) (1,243)(1,919) (126) (259)

Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities and other investments

 302 1,347 1,153 535
 133
 302

Payments made in connection with business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 (2,644) (49) (167)
 (7) (2,644)

Proceeds from business divestitures, net

 246 6  
 475
 246

Net cash used in investing activities

 (5,534) (2,792) (2,803)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,717) 48
 (5,534)

Cash flows from financing activities:

��        
  
  

Short-term borrowings with original maturities less than 90 days, net

 74 148 (154)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities less than 90 days, net202
 97
 74
Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days887
 
 6,023

Proceeds from debt, net of issuance costs

 20,758 2,875 279 5
 4
 14,735
Payment of short term borrowings with original maturities greater than 90 days(3) 
 (6,296)

Payment of debt

 (15,867) (6,037) (5,721)(84) (2,188) (9,571)

Settlement of cash flow hedges

 (4)   (9) 4
 (4)

Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans

 371 297 288 
Net transfer of cash and cash equivalents to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
 (10,375) 
Net proceeds (payments) related to stock-based award activities57
 32
 (20)

Repurchase of common stock

 (2,883) (2,728) (1,532)(1,412) (1,161) (2,883)

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

 145 58 2 

Cash dividends paid

 (1,250) (1,184) (1,105)(894) (858) (1,250)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 1,344 (6,571) (7,943)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 2,300 2,970 862 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,251) (14,445) 808
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents709
 (11,145) 2,300

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 15,133 12,163 11,301 6,288
 17,433
 15,133

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $17,433 $15,133 $12,163 $6,997
 $6,288
 $17,433

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:

        
  
  

Income taxes paid, net of refunds

 $1,012 $1,267 $1,391 $438
 $587
 $1,012

Interest expense paid

 532 678 837 $322

$318

$532

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:

       
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:


 

 
Net assets transferred to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company$

$22,144

$

Purchase of assets under capital leases

 $70 $113 $3 $200
 $185
 $70

Stock awards assumed in business acquisitions

 31   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.




HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)


 Common Stock  
  
  
  
  
  
 

  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  
  
  
 Common Stock Additional
Paid-in Capital
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss
 Total HP
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
 Non- controlling
Interests of
Discontinued Operations
  Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

 Number
of Shares
 Par
Value
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Total HP
Stockholders'
Equity
 Non-
controlling
Interests
 Total Number of Shares Par Value Retained Earnings (Deficit) 

 In millions, except number of shares in thousands
 In millions, except number of shares in thousands

Balance October 31, 2012

 1,962,838 $20 $6,454 $21,521 $(5,559)$22,436 $397 $22,833 

Net earnings

       5,113   5,113   5,113 

Other comprehensive income, net of taxes

         1,781 1,781   1,781 

Comprehensive income

           6,894   6,894 

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other

 22,950   210 (2)   208   208 

Repurchases of common stock

 (77,905) (1) (1,550) 5   (1,546)   (1,546)

Tax deficiency from employee stock plans

     (149)     (149)   (149)

Cash dividends declared

       (1,074)   (1,074)   (1,074)

Stock-based compensation expense

     500     500   500 

Changes in non-controlling interest

             (10) (10)

Balance October 31, 2013

 1,907,883 $19 $5,465 $25,563 $(3,778)$27,269 $387 $27,656 

Net earnings

       5,013   5,013   5,013 

Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes

         (2,103) (2,103)   (2,103)

Comprehensive income

           2,910   2,910 

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other

 23,785   142 1   143   143 

Repurchases of common stock

 (92,380) (1) (2,694) (262)   (2,957)   (2,957)

Tax deficiency from employee stock plans

     (43)     (43)   (43)

Cash dividends declared

       (1,151)   (1,151)   (1,151)

Stock-based compensation expense

     560     560   560 

Changes in non-controlling interest

             9 9 

Balance October 31, 2014

 1,839,288 $18 $3,430 $29,164 $(5,881)$26,731 $396 $27,127 1,839,288
 $18
 $3,430
 $29,164
 $(5,881) $26,731
 $396
 $27,127

Net earnings

       4,554   4,554   4,554  
  
  
 4,554
  
 4,554
  
 4,554

Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes

         (421) (421)   (421) 
  
  
  
 (421) (421)  
 (421)

Comprehensive income

           4,133   4,133  
  
  
  
  
 4,133
  
 4,133

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other

 39,834   (34) 1   (33)   (33)39,834
  
 (34) 1
  
 (33)  
 (33)

Repurchases of common stock

 (75,403)   (2,237) (411)   (2,648)   (2,648)(75,403)  
 (2,237) (411)  
 (2,648)  
 (2,648)

Assumption of equity awards in connection with acquisitions

     31     31   31  
  
 31
 

  
 31
  
 31

Tax benefit from employee stock plans

     64     64   64  
  
 64
  
  
 64
  
 64

Cash dividends declared

       (1,219)   (1,219)   (1,219) 
  
  
 (1,219)  
 (1,219)  
 (1,219)

Stock-based compensation expense

     709     709   709  
  
 709
  
  
 709
  
 709

Changes in non-controlling interest

             (13) (13) 
  
  
  
  
  
 (13) (13)

Balance October 31, 2015

 1,803,719 $18 $1,963 $32,089 $(6,302)$27,768 $383 $28,151 1,803,719
 $18
 $1,963
 $32,089
 $(6,302) $27,768
 $383
 $28,151
Separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise 
  
  
 (37,225) 5,081
 (32,144) (383) (32,527)
Net earnings 
  
  
 2,496
 

 2,496
 

 2,496
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes 
  
  
 

 (217) (217) 

 (217)
Comprehensive income 
  
  
  
  
 2,279
 

 2,279
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other8,227
 

 29
 

 

 29
 

 29
Repurchases of common stock(99,855) (1) (1,144) 

 

 (1,145) 

 (1,145)
Cash dividends declared

 

 

 (858) 

 (858) 

 (858)
Stock-based compensation expense

 

 182
 

 

 182
 

 182
Balance October 31, 20161,712,091
 $17
 $1,030
 $(3,498) $(1,438) $(3,889) $
 $(3,889)
Net earnings

 

 

 2,526
 

 2,526
 

 2,526
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes

 

 

 

 20
 20
 

 20
Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 2,546
 

 2,546
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock plans and other18,532
 

 52
 

 

 52
 

 52
Repurchases of common stock(81,043) (1) (926) (520) 

 (1,447) 

 (1,447)
Cash dividends declared

 

 

 (894) 

 (894) 

 (894)
Stock-based compensation expense

 

 224
 

 

 224
 

 224
Balance October 31, 2017$1,649,580
 $16
 $380
 $(2,386) $(1,418) $(3,408) $
 $(3,408)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Overview

On November 1, 2015, (the "Distribution Date"), Hewlett-Packard Company completed the separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company ("(“Hewlett Packard Enterprise"Enterprise”), Hewlett-Packard Company'sCompany’s former enterprise technology infrastructure, software, services and financing businesses (the "Separation"“Separation”). In connection with the Separation, Hewlett-Packard Company changed its name to HP Inc. ("HP"(“HP”).

        On November 1, 2015, each of HP stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 21, 2015 (the "Record Date") received one share of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock for every one share of HP's common stock held as of the Record Date. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is now an independent public company trading on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "HPE". After the Separation, HP does not beneficially own any shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock and beginning November 1, 2015, HP no longer consolidates Hewlett Packard Enterprise within its financial results or reflect the financial results of Hewlett Packard Enterprise within its continuing results of operations.

In connection with the Separation, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise have entered into a separation and distribution agreement as well as various other agreements that provide a framework for the relationships between the parties, going forward, including among others a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, a transition service agreement, a real estate matters agreement, a master commercial agreement and an information technology service agreement. These agreements provide for the allocation between HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise of assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after the Separation and govern certain relationship between HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise after the Separation. For more information on the impacts of these agreements, see Note 3 "Restructuring", Note 4, "Retirement“Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans"Plans”, Note 5, "Stock-Based Compensation"“Stock-Based Compensation”, Note 6, "Taxes“Taxes on Earnings"Earnings”, Note 13 "Borrowings"7, “Supplementary Financial Information”, Note 16 "Litigation14, “Litigation and Contingencies"Contingencies” and Note 17 "Guarantees,15, “Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties"Warranties”.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of HP and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are prepared in conformity with United States ("(“U.S.") generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"(“GAAP”). HP has eliminatedFor all intercompany accounts and transactions. The historicalthe periods prior to the Separation, the financial results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of Hewlett Packard Enterprise are includedpresented as net earnings from discontinued operations in the consolidated financialConsolidated Statements of Earnings. The historical statements of HP for eachcomprehensive income and cash flows and the balances related to stockholders’ deficit have not been revised to reflect the effect of the fiscal years included in this report and will be reported asSeparation. For further information on discontinued operations, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

see Note 17, “Discontinued Operations”.

Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of HP and its subsidiaries and affiliates in which HP has a controlling financial interest or is the primary beneficiary. HP accounts for investments in companies over which HP has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not hold a controlling interest under the equity method,All intercompany balances and HP records its proportionate share of income or losses in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. HP presents non-controlling interests as a separate component within Total stockholder's equity in the Consolidated

transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Balance Sheets. Net earnings attributable to the non-controlling interests are eliminated within Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and are not presented separately as they were not material for any period presented.

Reclassifications

HP has made certain segment andchanges to the alignment of its business unit realignmentsunits in order to optimizealign its operating structure. Reclassifications of certain prior-year segment and business unit financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. HP made these changes to its business unit information have been made to conform to the current-year presentation. None of thein prior reporting periods on an as-is basis. The reporting changes impacts HP'shad no impact on previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from continuing operations, net earnings or net earnings per share ("EPS"(“EPS”). See Note 2, “Segment Information”, for a further discussion of HP's segment reorganization.

HP’s business unit realignments.

HP has reclassified certain prior-year amounts to conform to the current-year presentation including the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” and ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”.
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in HP'sHP’s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation

HP predominately uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. dollars are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities and at historical exchange rates for nonmonetary assets and liabilities. Net revenue, costs and expenses denominated in non-U.S. dollars are recorded in U.S. dollars at monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period. HP includes gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries designate
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2017, the local currencyFinancial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued guidance, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment. The updated guidance eliminates Step 2 of the impairment test, which requires entities to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 using a prospective approach. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP has early adopted this guidance in
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 in connection with its annual goodwill impairment test. The implementation of this guidance did not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for share-based payments, including the accounting for income taxes and forfeitures, as their functional currency, andwell as the classifications on the statements of cash flows. HP recordsearly adopted the translationamendments in the first quarter of their assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars atfiscal year 2017. Beginning November 1, 2016, stock-based compensation excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies are reflected in the balance sheet date as translation adjustments and includes themConsolidated Statements of Earnings as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive lossthe provision for taxes, whereas they previously were recognized as additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ deficit in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounting Pronouncements

HP has elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur to determine the stock-based compensation expense. Additionally, the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows now present excess tax benefits as an operating activity rather than as a financing activity, while the payment of withholding taxes on the settlement of stock-based compensation awards is presented as a financing activity rather than as an operating activity, with prior periods adjusted accordingly. This adoption resulted in a change to both cash flow from operating and investing activities of $22 million and $536 million for the years ended October 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively. See Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”, for additional impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In NovemberMay 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing disclosures for investments measured at net asset value (“NAV”) issued an accounting standards updateper share (or its equivalent), as a practical expedient for income taxes,fair value. This amendment removes the requirement to categorize these investments within the fair value hierarchy. The amendment also removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the NAV as a practical expedient. HP adopted the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. Other than the change in presentation of certain pension-related assets that use NAV as a practical expedient, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The new accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods therein. Earlyretrospective application, the adoption is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of interim or annual reporting periods. HP is currently assessing the impact of this adoptionnew guidance did not have an impact on itsthe Consolidated Financial Statements, and plans to adopt for its interim and annual reporting period beginning November 1, 2015.

Statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued guidance, which amended the existing accounting standards for intangible assets. The amendments provide explicit guidance to customers in determining the accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement, whereinarrangement. HP adopted the arrangements that do not convey a software license to the customer are accounted for as service contracts. HP is required to adopt the guidance prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2017; however early adoption is permitted as is retrospective application. HP is currently evaluatingyear 2017. The implementation of this guidance did not have an impact on the impact of these amendments on its Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In April 2015, the FASB issued guidance, which amended the existing accounting standards for imputationthe presentation of interest.debt issuance costs. The amendments require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. HP adopted the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The adoption resulted in the reclassification of unamortized debt issuance costs related to HP’s U.S. Dollar Global Notes from “Other non-current assets” to “Long-term debt” within the Consolidated Balance Sheets of $23 million as of October 31, 2016.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for derivatives and hedging. The amendment improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better represent the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and made certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Earlyyear 2020. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance, which amended the existing accounting standards for business combinations. The amendments clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be applied retrospectively withaccounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. HP is required to adopt the adjusted balance sheetguidance in the first quarter of each individual period presented, in order to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance.fiscal year 2019. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of these amendmentsthis guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which addresses the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows.  The guidance requires entities to present the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows.  HP is required to adopt the guidance retrospectively in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. Earlier adoption is permitted.  HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting for Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The guidance requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers, other
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

than inventory, when the transfer occurs. It also requires modified retrospective transition with a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.    
In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which requires credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, not based on incurred losses. Further, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses limited to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 using a modified retrospective approach. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance, which amends the existing accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance primarily addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. HP is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. Earlier adoption is permitted. HP is currently evaluating the timing and the impact of this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance, which amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The amendments (Topic 606) are based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update for a one-year deferral of the effective date, with an option of applying the standard on the original effective date, which for HP is the first quarter of fiscal 2018. In accordance with this deferral, HP is required to adopt these amendments in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented (“full retrospective method”) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application.application (“modified retrospective method”). HP is continuing to evaluate the impact of these amendments and the transition alternatives on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In April 2014, the FASB issued guidance which changes the criteria for identifying a discontinued operation. The guidance limits the definition of a discontinued operation to the disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. HP is required to adopt the guidancenew revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

2019 and intends to apply the modified retrospective method. Based on the initial assessment, it is anticipated that the adoption will not have a material impact on the amount or timing of revenue recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. We continue to make progress on assessing the overall impact of adoption of the standard on our business processes, systems and controls.

Revenue Recognition

General

HP recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services are rendered, the sales price or fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Additionally, HP recognizes hardware revenue on sales to channel partners, including resellers, distributors or value-added solution providers at the time of delivery when the channel partners have economic substance apart from HP, and HP has completed its obligations related to the sale. HP generally recognizes revenue for its standalone software sales to channel partners on receipt of evidence that the software has been sold to a specific end user. HP limits the amount of revenue recognized for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to customer-specified refund or return rights.

HP reduces revenue for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings, including price protection, rebates, promotions, other volume-based incentives and expected returns, at the later of the date of revenue recognition or the date the sales incentive is offered. Future market conditions and product transitions may require HP to take actions to increase customer incentive offerings, possibly resulting in an incremental reduction of revenue at the time the incentive is offered. For certain


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

incentive programs, HP estimates the number of customers expected to redeem the incentive based on historical experience and the specific terms and conditions of the incentive.

In instances when revenue is derived from sales of third-party vendor products or services, HP records revenue on a gross basis when HP is a principal to the transaction and on a net basis when HP is acting as an agent between the customer and the vendor. HP considers several factors to determine whether it is acting as a principal or an agent, most notably whether HP is the primary obligor to the customer, has established its own pricing and has inventory and credit risks.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

HP reports revenue net of any taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities, with the collected taxes recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority.

Multiple element arrangements

When a sales arrangement contains multiple elements or deliverables, such as hardware and software products, and/or services, HP allocates revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE"(“VSOE”) of selling price, if available, third-party evidence ("TPE"(“TPE”) if VSOE of selling price is not available, or estimated selling price ("ESP"(“ESP”) if neither VSOE of selling price nor TPE is available. HP establishes VSOE of selling price using the price charged for a deliverable when sold separately and, in rare instances, using the price established by management having the relevant authority. HP establishesevaluates TPE of selling price by evaluatingreviewing largely similar and interchangeable competitor products or services in standalone sales to similarly situated customers. HP establishes ESP based on management judgment considering internal factors such as margin objectives, pricing practices and controls, customer segment pricing strategies and the product life cycle.life-cycle. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies and technology industry life cycles.
In most arrangements with multiple elements, HP allocates the transaction price to the individual units of accounting at the inception of the arrangement based on their relative selling price.

        In multiple element arrangements that include software HP limits the amount of revenue recognized for delivered elements to the amount that is more-than-incidental, HP allocates the transaction price to the individual units of accounting for the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using the relative selling price of each of the deliverables in the arrangement basednot contingent on the selling price hierarchy. If the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable, the transaction price allocatedfuture delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to the group of software deliverables is then allocated to each component software deliverable.

customer-specified refund or return rights.

HP evaluates each deliverable in an arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. A deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value to the customer. For elementsdeliverables with no standalone value, HP recognizes revenue consistent with the pattern of delivery of the undelivered elements.final deliverable. If the arrangement includes a customer-negotiated refund or return right or other contingency relative to the delivered items, and the delivery and performance of the undelivered items is considered probable and substantially within HP'sHP’s control, the delivered element constitutes a separate unit of accounting. In arrangements with combined units of accounting, changes in the allocation of the transaction price among elements may impact the timing of revenue recognition for the contract but will not change the total revenue recognized for the contract.


Net revenue

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    Product revenue

    Hardware

Under HP'sHP’s standard terms and conditions of sale, HP transfers title and risk of loss to the customer at the time product is delivered to the customer and recognizes revenue accordingly, unless customer acceptance is uncertain or significant obligations to the customer remain. HP reduces revenue for estimated customer returns, price protection, rebates and other programs offered under sales agreements established by HP with its distributors and resellers. HP records revenue from the sale of equipment under sales-type leases as product revenue at the inception of the lease. HP accrues the estimated cost of post-sale obligations, including standard product warranties, based on historical experience at the time HP recognizes revenue.

    Software

        HP recognizes revenue from perpetual software licenses at the inception of the license term, assuming all revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Term-based software license revenue is generally recognized ratably over the term of the license. HP uses the residual method to allocate revenue to software licenses at inception of the arrangement when VSOE of fair value for all undelivered elements, such as post-contract customer support, exists and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. HP recognizes revenue from maintenance and unspecified upgrades or updates provided on a when-and- if-available basis ratably over the period during which such items are delivered.

        HP recognizes revenue for hosting or software-as-a-service ("SaaS") arrangements as the service is delivered, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contractual period of performance. In hosting arrangements, HP considers the rights provided to the customer (e.g. whether the customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty and the feasibility of the customer to operate or contract with another vendor to operate the software) in determining whether the arrangement includes the sale of a software license. In hosting arrangements where software licenses are sold, license revenue is generally recognized according to whether perpetual or term licenses are sold, when all other revenue recognition criteria are satisfied.

Services revenue

HP recognizes revenue from fixed-price support or maintenance contracts including extended warranty contracts and software post-contract customer support agreements, ratably over the contract period and recognizes the costs associated with these contracts as incurred. For time and material contracts, HP recognizes revenue as services are rendered and recognizes costs as they are incurred.

        HP recognizes revenue from certain fixed-price contracts, such as consulting arrangements, as work progresses over the contract period on a proportional performance basis, as determined by the percentage of labor costs incurred to date compared to the total estimated labor costs of a contract. HP recognizes revenue on fixed-price contracts for design and build projects (to design, develop and construct software and systems) using the percentage-of-completion method. HP uses the cost-to-cost method to measure progress toward completion as determined by the percentage of cost incurred to date compared to the total estimated costs of the project. Estimates of total project costs for fixed-price


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

contracts are regularly revised during the life of a contract. Provisions for estimated losses on fixed-priced contracts are recognized in the period when such losses become known. If reasonable and reliable cost estimates for a project cannot be made, HP uses the completed contract method and recognizes revenue and costs upon service completion.

        HP generally recognizes outsourcing services revenue in the period when the service is provided and the amount earned is not contingent on the occurrence of any future event. HP recognizes revenue using an objective measure of output for unit-priced contracts. Revenue for fixed-price outsourcing contracts with periodic billings is recognized on a straight-line basis if the service is provided evenly during the contract term. Provisions for estimated losses on outsourcing arrangements are recognized in the period when such losses become probable and estimable.

        HP recognizes revenue from operating leases on a straight-line basis as service revenue over the rental period.

    Financing income

        Sales-type and direct-financing leases produce financing income, which HP recognizes at consistent rates of return over the lease term.

    Deferred revenue and deferred costs

HP records amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. HP records revenue that is earned and recognized in excess of amounts invoiced on services contracts as trade receivables.

Deferred revenue represents amounts invoiced in advance for product support contracts software customer support contracts, outsourcing startup services work, consulting and integration projects, product sales or leasing income.

        HP recognizes costs associated with outsourcing contracts as incurred, unless such costs are considered direct and incremental to the startup phase of the contract, in which case HP defers these costs during the startup phase and subsequently amortizes such costs over the period that outsourcing services are provided, once those services commence. HP amortizes deferred contract costs on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the contract unless facts and circumstances of the contract indicate a shorter period is more appropriate. Based on actual and projected contract financial performance indicators, HP analyzes the recoverability of deferred contract costs using the undiscounted estimated cash flows of the contract over its remaining term. If such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of deferred contract costs and long-lived assets directly associated with the contract, the deferred contract costs are first impaired. If a cash flow deficiency remains after reducing the carrying amount of the deferred contract costs to zero, HP evaluates any remaining long-lived assets related to that contract for impairment.

sales.

Shipping and Handling

HP includes costs related to shipping and handling in Cost of products.

revenue.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

HP determines stock-based compensation expense based on the measurement date fair value of the award. HP recognizes compensation cost only for those awards expected to meet the service and performance vesting conditions on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. HP determines compensation costs at the aggregate grant level for service-based awards and at the individual vesting tranche level for awards with performance and/or market conditions. HP estimates the forfeiture rate based on its historical experience.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Retirement and Post-Retirement Plans

HP has various defined benefit, other contributory and noncontributorynon-contributory retirement and post-retirement plans. HP generally amortizes unrecognized actuarial gains and losses on a straight-line basis over the average remaining estimated service life of participants. In somelimited cases, HP amortizes actuarial gains and losses using the corridor approach. See Note 4, “Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans” for a full description of these plans and the accounting and funding policies.

Advertising

Costs to produce advertising are expensed as incurred during production. Costs to communicate advertising are expensed when the advertising is first run. Such costs totaled approximately $859$544 million in fiscal 2015, $834year 2017, $586 million in fiscal 2014year 2016 and $867$635 million in fiscal 2013.

year 2015.

Restructuring

and Other Charges

HP records charges associated with management-approved restructuring plans to reorganize one or more of HP'sHP’s business segments, to remove duplicative headcount and infrastructure associated with business acquisitions or to simplify business processes and accelerate innovation. Restructuring charges can include severance costs to eliminate a specified number of employees, infrastructure charges to vacate facilities and consolidate operations, and contract cancellation costs. HP records restructuring charges based on estimated employee terminations and site closure and consolidation plans. HP accrues for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The rates used in determining severance accruals are based on existing plans, historical experiences and negotiated settlements.

Other charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of Separation, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs. These costs primarily relate to information technology costs such as advisory, consulting and non-recurring labor costs.

Taxes on Earnings

HP recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year the differences are expected to reverse. HP records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

HP records accruals for uncertain tax positions when HP believes that it is not more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. HP makes adjustments to these accruals when facts and circumstances change, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of adjustments for uncertain tax positions, as well as any related interest and penalties.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Accounts Receivable

HP establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts receivable. HP records a specific reserve for individual accounts when HP becomes aware of specific customer circumstances, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing or deterioration in the customer'scustomer’s operating results or financial position. If there are additional changes in circumstances related to the specific customer, HP further adjusts estimates of the recoverability of receivables. HP maintains bad debt reserves for all other customers based on a variety of factors, including the use of third-party credit risk models that generate quantitative measures of default probabilities based on market factors, the financial condition of customers, the length of time receivables are past due, trends in the weighted-average risk rating for the portfolio, macroeconomic conditions, information derived from competitive benchmarking, significant one-time events and historical experience. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable.

HP has third-party short-term financing arrangements intended to facilitate the working capital requirements of certain customers. These financing arrangements, which in certain cases provide for partial recourse, result in the transfer of HP'sHP’s trade receivables to a third party. HP reflects amounts transferred to, but not yet collected from, the third party in accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For arrangements involving an element of recourse, the fair value of the recourse obligation is measured using market data from similar transactions and reported as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Concentrations of Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject HP to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables from trade customers and contract manufacturers financing receivables and derivatives.

HP maintains cash and cash equivalents, investments, derivatives and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are located in many different geographic regions, and HP'sHP’s policy is designed
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

to limit exposure from any particular institution. As part of its risk management processes, HP performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions. HP has not sustained material credit losses from instruments held at these financial institutions. HP utilizes derivative contracts to protect against the effects of foreign currency and interest rate exposures. Such contracts involve the risk of non-performance by the counterparty, which could result in a material loss.

The likelihood of which HP deems to be remote.

HP sells a significant portion of its products through third-party distributors and resellers and, as a result, maintains individually significant receivable balances with these parties. If the financial condition or operations of these distributors'distributors’ and resellers'resellers’ aggregated business deteriorates substantially, HP'sHP’s operating results could be adversely affected. The ten largest distributor and reseller receivable balances, which were concentrated primarily in North America and Europe, collectively represented 18% and 20%approximately 34% of gross accounts receivable as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014, respectively.2016. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of gross accounts receivable.receivable as of October 31, 2017 or 2016. Credit risk with respect to other accounts receivable and financing receivables is generally diversified due to the large number of entities comprising HP'sHP’s customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic regions. HP performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of its third-party distributors,


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

resellers and other customers and may require collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances.

HP utilizes outsourced contract manufacturers around the world to manufacture HP-designed products. HP may purchase product components from suppliers and sell those components to its contractoutsourced manufacturers thereby creating receivable balances from contractthe outsourced manufacturers. The three largest contractoutsourced manufacturer receivable balances collectively represented 60%70% and 65%78% of HP'sHP’s supplier receivables from contract manufacturers of $1.0 billion$951 million and $774 million as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. HP includes the supplier receivables from contract manufacturers in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis. HP'sHP’s credit risk associated with these receivables is mitigated wholly or in part, by the amount HP owes to these outsourced contract manufacturers, as HP generally has the legal right to offset its payables to contractthe outsourced manufacturers against these receivables. HP does not reflect the sale of these components in net revenue and does not recognize any profit on these component sales until the related products are sold by HP, at which time any profit is recognized as a reduction to cost of sales.

revenue. 

HP obtains a significant number of components from single source suppliers due to technology, availability, price, quality or other considerations. The loss of a single source supplier, the deterioration of HP'sHP’s relationship with a single source supplier, or any unilateral modification to the contractual terms under which HP is supplied components by a single source supplier could adversely affect HP'sHP’s net revenue and gross margins.

Upon completion of the Separation on November 1, 2015, HP recorded net income tax indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain income tax liabilities that HP is jointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by Hewlett Packard Enterprise under the tax matters agreement (“TMA”). The actual amount that Hewlett Packard Enterprise may be obligated to pay HP could vary depending on the outcome of certain unresolved tax matters, which may not be resolved for several years. The net receivable as of October 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively.
Inventory

HP values inventory at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard cost which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Adjustments, if required, to reduce the cost of inventory to its netmarket (net realizable valuevalue) are made, if required, for estimated excess, obsolete or obsolescence.

impaired balances.

Property, Plant and Equipment

HP states property, plant and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. HP capitalizes additions and improvements and expenses maintenance and repairs as incurred. Depreciation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are five to 40 years for buildings and improvements and three to 15 years for machinery and equipment. HP depreciates leasehold improvements over the life of the lease or the asset, whichever is shorter. HP depreciates equipment held for lease over the initial term of the lease to the equipment'sequipment’s estimated residual value. The estimated useful lives of assets used solely to support a customer services contract generally do not exceed the term of the customer contract. On retirement or disposition, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets with any gain or loss recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

        HP capitalizes certain internal and external costs incurred to acquire or create internal use software, principally related to software coding, designing system interfaces and installation and testing of the software. HP amortizes capitalized internal use software costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the software, generally from three to five years.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Business Combinations

HP includes the results of operations of acquired businesses in HP'sHP’s consolidated results prospectively from the date of acquisition.acquisition date. HP allocates the fair value of purchase consideration to the assets acquired, including in-process research and development ("IPR&D"), liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquired entity generally based on their fair values at the acquisition date. IPR&D is initially capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter. When the IPR&D project is complete, it is reclassified as an amortizable purchased intangible asset and is amortized over its estimated useful life. If an IPR&D project is abandoned, HP will record a charge for the value of the related intangible asset to HP's Consolidated Statement of Earnings in the period it is abandoned. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair value of these assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the acquired entity is recorded as goodwill. The primary items that generate goodwill include the value of the synergies between the
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

acquired company and HP and the value of the acquired assembled workforce, neither of which qualifies for recognition as an intangible asset. Acquisition-related expenses and post-acquisition restructuring costscharges are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.

These charges include, direct expenses such as third-party professional and legal fees, and integration-related costs.

Goodwill

HP reviews goodwill for impairment annually during its fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. While HP is permittedcan opt to conductperform a qualitative assessment to determine whether ittest a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment or HP can directly perform the quantitative impairment test. Based on the qualitative assessment, if HP determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is necessarymore likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to performbe less than its carrying amount, a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test for its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, HP performed a quantitative test for all of its reporting units. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. As of October 31, 2015, HP's reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 2, except for Enterprise Services ("ES"), which consists of two reporting units: MphasiS Limited and the remainder of ES.

will be performed.

In the first step of thequantitative impairment test, HP compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount. HP estimatesamount with the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of fair values derived most significantly from the income approach, and to a lesser extent, the market approach. Under the income approach, HP estimates the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. HP bases cash flow projections on management'smanagement’s estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. HP bases the discount rate on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit'sunit’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. Under the market approach, HP estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. HP weights the fair value derived from the market approach depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, HP estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach. For the MphasiS Limited reporting unit, HP utilized the quoted market price in an active market to estimate fair value.

In order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair value of HP'sHP’s reporting units, HP compares the aggregate reporting unit fair value to HP'sHP’s market capitalization on an overall basis and calculates an


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

implied control premium (the excess of the sum of the reporting units'units’ fair value over HP'sHP’s market capitalization)capitalization on an overall basis). HP evaluates the control premium by comparing it to observable control premiums from recent comparable transactions. If the implied control premium is determined to not believed to be reasonable in light of these recent transactions, HP reevaluatesre-evaluates its reporting unit fair values, which may result in an adjustment to the discount rate and/or other assumptions. This reevaluationre-evaluation could result in a change to the estimated fair value for certain or all reporting units.

If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required.impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then HP performsgoodwill is impaired and the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In the second step, HP measures the reporting unit's assets, including any unrecognized intangible assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests at fair value in a hypothetical analysis to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting unit in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair valueexcess of the reporting unit's goodwillunit’s carrying value over the fair value is less than its carrying amount, the difference is recordedrecognized as an impairment loss.

Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

        HP reviews intangible assets with finite lives and long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. HP assesses the recoverability of assets based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount, the asset is impaired. HP measures the amount of impairment loss, if any, as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value using an income approach or, when available and appropriate, using a market approach. HP amortizes intangible assets with finite lives using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, ranging from one to ten years.

Debt and Marketable Equity Securities Investments

HP determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates the classifications at each balance sheet date. Debt and marketable equity securities are generally considered available-for-saleavailable-for-sale. All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Marketable debt securities with maturities of twelve months or less are classified as short-term investments and marketable debt securities with maturities greater than twelve months are classified based on their availability for use in current operations.  Marketable equity securities, including mutual funds, are classified as either short-term or long-term based on the nature of each security and its availability for use in current operations.
Debt and marketable equity securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses foron available-for-sale securities are calculated based on the specific identification method and included in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. HP monitors its investment portfolio for potential impairment on a quarterly basis. When the carrying amount of an investment in debt securities exceeds its fair value and the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary (i.e., when HP does not intend to sell the debt securities and it is not more likely than not that HP will be required to sell the debt securities prior to anticipated recovery of its amortized cost basis), HP records an impairment charge to Interest and other, net in the amount of the credit loss and the balance,remaining amount, if any, is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Derivatives

HP uses derivative instruments, primarily forwards, swaps, and at times, options, to hedge certain foreign currency and interest rate exposures. HP also may use other derivative instruments not


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

designated as hedges, such as forwards used to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures. HP does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. See Note 1210, “Financial Instruments” for a full description of HP'sHP’s derivative financial instrument activities and related accounting policies.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 1: Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Loss Contingencies

HP is involved in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. HP records a liability for contingencies when it believes it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. See Note 1614, “Litigation and Contingencies” for a full description of HP'sHP’s loss contingencies and related accounting policies.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


Note 2: Segment Information

HP is a leading global provider of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, software, solutions and servicesservices. HP sells to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses ("SMBs"(“SMBs”) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors. HP's offerings span the following:

    personal computing and other access devices;

    imaging- and printing-related products and services;

    enterprise information technology ("IT") infrastructure, including enterprise server and storage technology, networking products and solutions, and technology support and maintenance;

    multi-vendor customer services, including technology consulting, outsourcing and support services across infrastructure, applications and business process domains; and

    software products and solutions, including application testing and delivery, big data analytics, enterprise security, information governance and IT Operations Management.

        HP's

HP’s operations are organized into seventhree segments for financial reporting purposes: Personal Systems, Printing the Enterprise Group ("EG"), Enterprise Services ("ES"), Software, HP Financial Services ("HPFS") and Corporate Investments. HP'sHP’s organizational structure is based on a number of factors that managementthe chief operating decision maker uses to evaluate, view and run its business operations, which include, but are not limited to, customer base and homogeneity of products and technology. The segments are based on this organizational structure and information reviewed by HP's managementHP’s chief operating decision maker to evaluate segment results.

The Personal Systems segment andchief operating decision maker uses several metrics to evaluate the Printing segment are structured beneath a broader Printing and Personal Systems Group ("PPS"). While PPS is not a reportable segment, HP may provide financial data aggregating the Personal Systems and the Printing segments in order to provide a supplementary view of its business.

        As a resultperformance of the Separation, beginning November 1, 2015, HP will report three segments as partoverall business, including earnings from operations, and uses these results to allocate resources to each of continuing operations: Personal Systems, Printing and Corporate Investments.

the segments.

A summary description of each segment follows.

is as follows:

        ThePrinting and Personal Systems Group's mission is to leverage the respective strengths of the Personal Systems business and the Printing business by creating a unified organization that is


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)

customer-focused and poised to capitalize on rapidly shifting industry trends. Each of the segments within PPS is described below.

Personal Systems provides commercialCommercial and Consumer personal computers ("PCs"(“PCs”), consumer PCs, workstations,Workstations, thin clients, Commercial tablets and mobility devices, retail point-of-sale systems, calculatorsdisplays and other related accessories, software, support and services for the commercial and consumer markets. HP groups commercialCommercial notebooks, commercialCommercial desktops, commercialCommercial services, commercialCommercial tablets workstationsand mobility devices, Commercial detachables, Workstations, retail point-of-sale systems and thin clients into commercialCommercial clients and consumerConsumer notebooks, consumerConsumer desktops, consumerConsumer services and consumer tabletsConsumer detachables into consumerConsumer clients when describing performance in these markets. Described below are HP'sHP’s global business capabilities within Personal Systems.Systems:

Commercial PCs are optimized for use by customers, including enterprise and SMB customers,SMBs, with a focus on robust designs, security, serviceability, connectivity, reliability and manageability in networked environments. Additionally, HP offers a range of services and solutions to enterprise and SMBs to help them manage the lifecycle of their PC and mobility installed base.


Consumer PCs are notebooks, desktops,Notebooks, Desktops, and hybrids that are optimized for consumer usage, focusing on multi-media consumption, online browsing, gaming and light productivity.

Personal Systems groups its global business capabilities into Notebooks, Desktops, Workstations and Other when reporting business performance.
Printing provides consumerConsumer and commercialCommercial printer hardware, supplies, media, softwareSupplies, solutions and services, as well as scanning devices. Printing is also focused on imaging solutions in the commercial markets. HP groups LaserJet, large format printers and commercial inkjet printers into Commercial Hardware and consumer inkjet printers into Consumer Hardware when describing performance in these markets. Described below are HP'sHP’s global business capabilities within Printing.

LaserJet and EnterpriseOffice Printing Solutions deliver HP's LaserJet and enterprise products,delivers HP’s office printers, supplies, services and solutions to SMBs and large enterprises. Managed Print Services providesHP goes to market through its extensive channel network and directly with HP sales. Ongoing key initiatives include design and deployment of A3 products and solutions for the copier and multifunction printer market, printer security solutions, PageWide solutions and award-winning JetIntelligence Laserjet products.
Home Printing Solutions delivers innovative printing equipment, supplies, support, workflow optimizationproducts and security servicessolutions for SMBsthe home and enterprisehome business or small office customers around the world, utilizing proprietary HP toolsboth HP’s Ink and fleet management solutions as well as third-party software.

Inkjet and Printing Solutions deliver HP's consumer and SMB inkjet solutions (hardware, supplies, media, and web-connected hardware and services). Ongoing initiatives and programs such as Ink in the Office and Ink Advantage and newer initiativesLaser technologies. Initiatives such as Instant Ink and Continuous Ink Supply System provide innovative printing solutionsbusiness model innovation to consumersbenefit and SMBs.expand HP’s existing customer base, while new innovations like Sprocket drive print relevance for a mobile generation.


Graphics Solutions deliver large format printers (Designjet, Large Format Production,offers large-format, commercial and Scitex Industrial), specialty printing, digital pressindustrial solutions (Indigo and Inkjet Webpress), supplies and services to print service providers and designpackaging converters through the largest portfolio of printers and rendering customers.presses (HP DesignJet, HP Latex, HP Scitex, HP Indigo and HP PageWide Web Presses).
3D Printing

Softwaredelivers HP’s Multi-Jet Fusion 3D Printing Solution designed for prototyping and Web Services delivers a suiteproduction of solutionsfunctional parts and services, including photo storage and web-connectedfunctioning on an open platform facilitating the development of new 3D printing services.materials.

Marketing Optimization focuses on delivering solutions that help businesses engage audiences, reach new customer segments and markets and deliver compelling content across channels. The group provides solutions for augmented reality, contact center analytics, customer communications management and digital experience management.

        TheEnterprise Group provides servers, storage, networking and technology services that, when combined with HP's cloud solutions, enable customers to manage applications across public cloud, virtual private cloud, private cloud and traditional IT environments. Described below are HP's business units and capabilities within EG.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)


Printing groups its global business capabilities into the following business units when reporting business performance:
Commercial Hardware

    Industry Standard Serversconsists of Office Printing Solutions, Graphics Solutions and 3D Printing, excluding supplies;
Consumer Hardware includes Home Printing Solutions, excluding supplies; and
Supplies offerscomprises a rangeset of highly innovative consumable products, ranging from entry-level servers through premium ProLiant servers, which run primarily Windows, LinuxInk and virtualization platforms from software providers such as Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft")Laser print cartridges; and VMware, Inc. ("VMware")media to graphics supplies and open sourced software from other major vendors while leveraging x86 processors from Intel Corporation ("Intel")3D printing supplies, for recurring use in Consumer and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ("AMD").Commercial Hardware.



Business Critical Systems offers HP Integrity servers based on the Intel® Itanium® and x86 processors, HP Integrity NonStop solutions and mission-critical x86 ProLiant servers.

Storage offers traditional storage and Converged Storage solutions. Traditional storage includes tape, storage networking and legacy external disk products such as EVA and XP. Converged Storage solutions include 3PAR StoreServ, StoreOnce and StoreVirtual products.

Networking offers wireless local area network, mobility and security software, switches, routers and network management products that span data centers, campus and branch environments and deliver software-defined networking and unified communications capabilities.

Technology Services provides support services and technology consulting to integrate and optimize EG's hardware platforms for the new style of IT. These services are available in the form of service contracts, pre-packaged offerings or on a customized basis.

Enterprise Services provides technology consulting, outsourcing and support services across infrastructure, applications and business process domains. ES is comprised of the Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing ("ITO") and the Application and Business Services ("ABS") business units.

    Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing delivers comprehensive services that encompass the management of data centers, IT security, cloud computing, workplace technology, networks, unified communications and enterprise service management.

    Application and Business Services helps clients develop, revitalize and manage their applications and information assets.

Software provides big data analytics and applications, enterprise security, application testing and delivery management and IT Operations Management solutions for businesses and other enterprises of all sizes. These software offerings include licenses, support, professional services and software-as-a-service.

HP Financial Services provides flexible investment solutions, such as leasing, financing, IT consumption and utility programs and asset management services, for customers to enable the creation of unique technology deployment models and acquire complete IT solutions, including hardware, software and services from HP and others. Providing flexible services and capabilities that support the entire IT lifecycle, HPFS partners with customers globally to help build investment strategies that enhance their business agility and support their business transformation. HPFS offers a wide selection of investment solution capabilities for large enterprise customers and channel partners, along with an array of financial options to SMBs and educational and governmental entities.

Corporate Investments includes HP Labs and certain enterprise-related business incubation projects and venture focused minority investments among others.projects.


Table of Contents


The accounting policies HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notesuses to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)

Segment Policy

derive segment results are substantially the same as those used by HP in preparing these financial statements. HP derives the results of the business segments directly from its internal management reporting system. The accounting policies HP uses to derive segment results are substantially the same as those the consolidated company uses. Management measures the performance of each segment based on several metrics, including earnings from operations. Management uses these results, in part, to evaluate the performance of, and to allocate resources to, each of the segments.

Segment net revenue includes revenues from sales to external customers and intersegmentcertain revenues that reflect transactions betweenrelated to Managed Print Services arrangements, which are eliminated for the segments on an arm's-length basis. Intersegment revenues primarily consistpurposes of sales of hardware and software that are sourced internally and, in the majority of the cases, are financed as operating leases by HPFS. HP'sreporting HP’s consolidated net revenue is derived and reported after the elimination of intersegment revenues from such arrangements.

        HP periodically engages in intercompany advanced royalty payment and licensing arrangements that may result in advance payments between subsidiaries. Revenues from these intercompany arrangements are deferred and recognized as earned over the term of the arrangement by the HP legal entities involved in such transactions; however, these advanced payments are eliminated from revenues as reported by HP and its business segments. As disclosed in Note 6, during fiscal 2015, HP executed an intercompany advanced royalty payment arrangement resulting in advanced payments of $8.8 billion, while during fiscal 2014 HP executed a multi-year intercompany licensing arrangement and intercompany advanced royalty payment arrangement which resulted in combined advanced payments of $11.5 billion. In these transactions, the payments were received in the U.S. from a foreign consolidated affiliate, with a deferral of intercompany revenues over the term of the arrangements, approximately 5 years and 15 years, respectively. The impact of these intercompany arrangements is eliminated from both HP consolidated and segment revenues.

        Financing interest in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings reflects interest expense on debt attributable to HPFS. Debt attributable to HPFS consists of intercompany equity that is treated as debt for segment reporting purposes, intercompany debt, and borrowing- and funding-related activity associated with HPFS and its subsidiaries.

revenue.


HP does not allocate to its segments certain operating expenses, which it manages at the corporate level.level, to its segments. These unallocated costsamounts include certain corporate governance costs and market-related retirement credits, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other charges, acquisition-related charges, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, acquisition and other related charges, separation costs, defined benefit plan settlement charges and impairment of data center assets.

Segmentnet revenue eliminations, primarily related to Managed Print Services.


Business Unit Realignment


Effective at the beginning of theits first quarter of fiscal 2015,year 2017, HP implemented an organizational change to align its segmentbusiness unit financial reporting more closely with its current business structure. This organizational change resulted in the transfer of third-party multi-vendor support arrangementsa portion of LaserJet printers from the Technology Services ("TS") business unitCommercial to Consumer within the EG segment to the ITO business unit within the ESPrinting segment. HP has reflected this change to its segment information retrospectively to the earliest period presented, which has resulted in the removal of intersegment revenue from the TS business unit within the EG segment and the related corporate intersegment revenue eliminations, and the transfer of operating profit from the TS business unit within the EG segment to the ITO business unit within the ES segment.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)

        In connection with the Separation, effective at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, HP implemented an organizational change which resulted in the transfer of marketing optimization solutions business from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. HP has reflected this change to its segment information in prior reporting periods on an as-ifas-is basis which resulted in the transfer of net revenue from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. This change also resulted in the transfer of operating profit from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. In addition, this changethat resulted in the reclassification of $512 millionrevenues between the Commercial and Consumer business units of goodwill from the Software segment to the Printing segment.

        These changesPrinting. The reporting change had no impact on HP'sto previously reported segment net revenue, consolidated net revenue, earnings from continuing operations, net earnings or net EPS.

earnings per share.

Segment Operating Results

from Continuing Operations

 
 Printing and
Personal Systems
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 Personal
Systems
 Printing Enterprise
Group
 Enterprise
Services
 Software HP Financial
Services
 Corporate
Investments
 Total 
 
 In millions
 

2015

                         

Net revenue

 $30,438 $20,938 $26,670 $19,009 $3,142 $3,131 $27 $103,355 

Intersegment net revenue and other

  1,031  294  1,237  797  316  85    3,760 

Total segment net revenue

 $31,469 $21,232 $27,907 $19,806 $3,458 $3,216 $27 $107,115 

Earnings (loss) from operations

 $1,064 $3,865 $3,981 $1,051 $760 $349 $(565)$10,505 

2014

                         

Net revenue

 $33,304 $22,951 $26,809 $21,297 $3,375 $3,416 $302 $111,454 

Intersegment net revenue and other

  999  260  914  1,101  326  82    3,682 

Total segment net revenue

 $34,303 $23,211 $27,723 $22,398 $3,701 $3,498 $302 $115,136 

Earnings (loss) from operations

 $1,270 $4,229 $3,995 $816 $828 $389 $(199)$11,328 

2013

                         

Net revenue

 $31,232 $23,917 $27,045 $23,041 $3,469 $3,570 $24 $112,298 

Intersegment net revenue and other

  947  211  958  1,020  320  59    3,515 

Total segment net revenue

 $32,179 $24,128 $28,003 $24,061 $3,789 $3,629 $24 $115,813 

Earnings (loss) from operations

 $980 $3,953 $4,245 $693 $848 $399 $(316)$10,802 
 Personal
Systems
 Printing Corporate
Investments
 Total
Segments
 
Eliminations
and Other
 Total
 In millions
2017 
  
  
  
  
  
Net revenue$33,374
 $18,801
 $8
 $52,183
 $(127) $52,056
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations$1,213
 $3,161
 $(87) $4,287
  
  
2016 
  
  
  
  
  
Net revenue$29,987
 $18,260
 $7
 $48,254
 $(16)
(1) 
$48,238
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations$1,150
 $3,128
 $(98) $4,180
  
  
2015 
  
  
  
  
  
Net revenue$31,520
 $21,232
 $20
 $52,772
 $(1,309) $51,463
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations$1,022
 $3,765
 $(43) $4,744
  
  
(1)    For the fiscal year 2016, the amount includes the recognition of revenue previously deferred in relation to sales to the
pre-Separation finance entity.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)

The reconciliation of segment operating results to HP consolidated results was as follows:

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)


 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Net Revenue:

          

Total segments

 $107,115 $115,136 $115,813 

Elimination of intersegment net revenue and other

  (3,760) (3,682) (3,515)

Total HP consolidated net revenue

 $103,355 $111,454 $112,298 

Earnings before taxes:

          

Total segment earnings from operations

 $10,505 $11,328 $10,802 

Corporate and unallocated costs and eliminations

  (724) (953) (786)

Stock-based compensation expense

  (709) (560) (500)

Amortization of intangible assets

  (931) (1,000) (1,373)

Restructuring charges

  (1,017) (1,619) (990)

Acquisition and other related charges

  (90) (11) (22)

Separation costs

  (1,259)    

Defined benefit plan settlement charges

  (168)    

Impairment of data center assets

  (136)    

Interest and other, net

  (739) (628) (621)

Total HP consolidated earnings before taxes

 $4,732 $6,557 $6,510 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
   In millions  
Net revenue: 
  
  
Total segments$52,183
 $48,254
 $52,772
Net revenue eliminations and other(127) (16) (1,309)
Total net revenue$52,056
 $48,238
 $51,463
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes:

  
  
Total segment earnings from operations$4,287
 $4,180
 $4,744
Corporate and unallocated costs and eliminations(51) (42) (503)
Stock-based compensation expense(224) (182) (212)
Restructuring and other charges(362) (205) (63)
Acquisition-related charges(125) (7) (1)
Amortization of intangible assets(1) (16) (102)
Defined benefit plan settlement (charges) credits(5) (179) 57
Interest and other, net(243) 212
 (388)
Total earnings from continuing operations before taxes$3,276
 $3,761
 $3,532


Segment Assets

HP allocates assets to its business segments based on the segments primarily benefiting from the assets. Total assets by segment and the reconciliation of segment assets to HP consolidated assets were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Personal Systems

 $9,534 $12,104 

Printing

  8,994  10,666 

Printing and Personal Systems Group

  18,528  22,770 

Enterprise Group(1)

  33,499  27,236 

Enterprise Services

  14,354  13,472 

Software

  11,226  10,972 

HP Financial Services

  13,093  13,529 

Corporate Investments

  56  34 

Corporate and unallocated assets

  16,126  15,193 

Total HP consolidated assets

 $106,882 $103,206 

(1)
In connection with the acquisition of Aruba Networks, Inc. ("Aruba") in fiscal 2015, HP recorded approximately $1.8 billion of goodwill, $643 million of intangible assets and $153 million of IPR&D. HP reports the financial results of Aruba's business in the Networking business unit within the EG segment.

 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Personal Systems$12,156
 $10,686
Printing10,548
 9,959
Corporate Investments3
 1
Corporate and unallocated assets10,206
 8,341
Total assets$32,913
 $28,987

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)

Major Customers

No single customer represented 10% or more of HP's totalHP’s net revenue in any fiscal year presented.


Geographic Information

Net revenue by country is based upon the sales location that predominately represents the customer location. For each of the fiscal years of 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, other than the U.S.,United States, no country represented more than 10% of HP'sHP net revenue.

Net revenue by country in which HP operates was as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

U.S. 

 $37,679 $38,805 $40,284 

Other countries

  65,676  72,649  72,014 

Total net revenue

 $103,355 $111,454 $112,298 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
   In millions  
United States$19,321
 $18,042
 $17,746
Other countries32,735
 30,196
 33,717
Total net revenue$52,056
 $48,238
 $51,463

        As of October 31, 2015, the U.S. and Netherlands each represented more than 10% of net assets. As of October 31, 2014, the U.S., Netherlands and Ireland each represented 10% or more of net assets.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)


Net property, plant and equipment by country in which HP operates was as follows:

follows
 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

U.S. 

 $5,501 $5,668 

United Kingdom. 

  955  1,053 

Other countries

  4,634  4,619 

Total net property, plant and equipment

 $11,090 $11,340 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
United States$866
 $737
Singapore372
 314
Other countries640
 685
Total net property, plant and equipment$1,878
 $1,736

Table

No single country other than those represented above exceeds 10% or more of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2: Segment Information (Continued)

HP’s total net property, plant and equipment in any fiscal year presented.

Net revenue by segment and business unit was as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Notebooks

 $17,271 $17,540 $16,029 

Desktops

  10,941  13,197  12,844 

Workstations

  2,018  2,218  2,147 

Other

  1,239  1,348  1,159 

Personal Systems

  31,469  34,303  32,179 

Supplies

  13,979  14,917  15,716 

Commercial Hardware

  5,378  5,949  5,976 

Consumer Hardware

  1,875  2,345  2,436 

Printing

  21,232  23,211  24,128 

Total Printing and Personal Systems Group

  52,701  57,514  56,307 

Industry Standard Servers

  13,412  12,474  12,102 

Technology Services

  7,662  8,375  8,710 

Storage

  3,180  3,316  3,475 

Networking

  2,846  2,629  2,526 

Business Critical Systems

  807  929  1,190 

Enterprise Group

  27,907  27,723  28,003 

Infrastructure Technology Outsourcing

  12,107  14,038  15,223 

Application and Business Services

  7,699  8,360  8,838 

Enterprise Services

  19,806  22,398  24,061 

Software

  3,458  3,701  3,789 

HP Financial Services

  3,216  3,498  3,629 

Corporate Investments

  27  302  24 

Total segment net revenue

  107,115  115,136  115,813 

Eliminations of intersegment net revenue and other

  (3,760) (3,682) (3,515)

Total net revenue

 $103,355 $111,454 $112,298 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
   In millions  
Notebooks$19,782
 $16,982
 $17,271
Desktops10,298
 9,956
 10,941
Workstations2,042
 1,870
 2,018
Other1,252
 1,179
 1,290
Personal Systems33,374
 29,987
 31,520
Supplies12,416
 11,875
 13,979
Commercial Hardware3,973
 4,035
 4,350
Consumer Hardware2,412
 2,350
 2,903
Printing18,801
 18,260
 21,232
Corporate Investments8
 7
 20
Total segment net revenue52,183
 48,254
 52,772
Net revenue eliminations and other(127) (16) (1,309)
Total net revenue$52,056
 $48,238
 $51,463

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)



Note 3: Restructuring and Other Charges

Summary of Restructuring Plans

        HP's


HP’s restructuring activities in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 summarized by plan were as follows:

 
  
 Fiscal 2015  
 As of October 31,
2015
 
 
 Balance,
October 31,
2014
 Charges Cash
Payments
 Other
Adjustments
and Non-Cash
Settlements
 Balance,
October 31,
2015
 Total
Costs
Incurred
to Date
 Total
Expected
Costs to Be
Incurred
 
 
 In millions
 

Fiscal 2015 Plan

                      

Severance

 $ $390 $ $ $390 $390 $2,355 

Infrastructure and other

    1  (1)     1  506 

Total 2015 Plan

    391  (1)   390  391  2,861 

Fiscal 2012 Plan

                      

Severance and EER

  955  566  (1,101) (78) 342  4,959  4,959 

Infrastructure and other

  98  74  (120) (4) 48  589  589 

Total 2012 Plan

  1,053  640  (1,221) (82) 390  5,548  5,548 

Other Plans:

                      

Severance

  7  (4) (1) (1) 1  2,625  2,625 

Infrastructure

  54  (10) (20)   24  1,424  1,424 

Total Other Plans

  61  (14) (21) (1) 25  4,049  4,049 

Total restructuring plans

 $1,114 $1,017 $(1,243)$(83)$805 $9,988 $12,458 

Reflected in Consolidated Balance Sheets:

                      

Accrued restructuring

 $898          $689       

Other liabilities

 $216          $116       
 Fiscal 2017 Plan Fiscal 2015 Plan Fiscal 2012 Plan 
 Severance 
Infrastructure and other(1)
 
Severance and PRP(2)
 Infrastructure and other 
Severance and EER(3)
 Infrastructure and other Total
 In millions
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2014$
 $
 $
 $
 $218
 $7
 $225
Charges
 
 39
 
 23
 1
 63
Cash payments
 
 
 
 (216) (4) (220)
Non-cash and other adjustments
 
 
 
 (4) (1) (5)
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2015
 
 39
 
 21
 3
 63
Charges24
 
 117
 27
 7
 
 175
Cash payments
 
 (122) (4) (30) (1) (157)
Non-cash and other adjustments
 
 (13) (19) 9
 
 (23)
Accrued balance as of October 31, 201624
 
 21
 4
 7
 2
 58
Charges117
 94
 15
 
 1
 
 227
Cash payments(68) (23) (36) (2) (5) 
 (134)
Non-cash and other adjustments3
 (52) 6
 
 
 
 (43)
Accrued balance as of October 31, 2017$76
 $19
 $6
 $2
 $3
 $2
 $108
Total costs incurred to date as of October 31, 2017$141
 $94
 $171
 $27
 $1,075
 $44
 $1,552
Reflected in Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other accrued liabilities$76
 $19
 $6
 $2
 $3
 $1
 $107
Other non-current liabilities$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
 $1

(1)
Infrastructure and other includes asset impairment charges of $52 million in fiscal year 2017 associated with the consolidation of manufacturing into global hubs.
(2)
PRP represents Phased Retirement Program.
(3)
EER represents Enhanced Early Retirement.


Fiscal 2017 Plan

On October 10, 2016, HP’s Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2017 Plan”) which it expects will be implemented through fiscal year 2019. HP estimates that it will incur aggregate pre-tax charges between $350 million and $500 million relating to labor and non-labor actions. HP estimates that approximately half of the expected cumulative pre-tax costs will relate to severance and the remaining will relate to infrastructure, non-labor actions and other charges, as described below. HP expects between 3,000 and 4,000 employees to exit by the end of fiscal year 2019.
Fiscal 2015 Restructuring Plan

In connection with the Separation, on September 14, 2015, HP'sHP’s Board of Directors approved a cost saving and investment proposal which includes a restructuringsavings plan (the "2015 Plan"“Fiscal 2015 Plan”) which will be implemented through fiscal 2018. As part of theincluded labor and non-labor actions. The Fiscal 2015 Plan was considered substantially complete as of October 31, 2016 and HP expects up to approximately 33,300does not expect any further activity associated with this plan. Approximately 3,000 employees to exit the companyexited by the end of 2018. These workforce reductions are primarilyfiscal year 2016.
Fiscal 2012 Plan
HP initiated a restructuring plan in fiscal year 2012 (the “Fiscal 2012 Plan”), which included severance and infrastructure costs. The Fiscal 2012 Plan was considered substantially complete as of October 31, 2016 and HP does not expect any further activity associated with the ES segment. The changes to the workforce will vary by country, based on local legal requirements and consultations with employee works councils and other employee representatives, as appropriate. HP estimates that it will incur aggregate pre-tax charges through fiscal 2018 of approximately $2.9 billion in connection with the 2015 Plan, of which the estimated cost for HP Inc. is approximately $280 million. Total estimated charges as a result of workforce reductions are approximately $2.4 billion and total estimated charges for real estate consolidation are approximately $506 million.

this plan.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3: Restructuring and Other Charges (Continued)

Fiscal 2012 Restructuring Plan

        On May 23, 2012,



Other charges
Other charges include non-recurring costs, including those as a result of the Separation, and are distinct from ongoing operational costs. These costs primarily relate to information technology costs such as advisory, consulting and non-recurring labor costs. HP adopted a multi-year restructuring plan (the "2012 Plan") designed to simplify business processes, accelerate innovationincurred $135 million and deliver better results for customers, employees and stockholders. As$30 million of October 31, 2015 HP eliminated 55,800 positions in connection with the 2012 Plan, with a portion of those employees exiting the company as part of voluntary enhanced early retirement ("EER") programs in the U.S. and in certain other countries. HP recognized $5.5 billion in total aggregate charges in connection with the 2012 Plan, with $4.9 billion related to workforce reductions, including the EER programs,fiscal year 2017 and $589 million related to infrastructure, including data center and real estate consolidation and2016, respectively. There were no other items. The severance and infrastructure related cash payments associated with the 2012 Plan are expected to be paid out through fiscal 2021. As of October 31, 2015, the 2012 Plan is considered completed. HP does not expect any additional charges to this plan.

Other Plans

        Restructuring plans initiated by HPincurred in fiscal 2008 and 2010 were substantially completed as of October 31,year 2015. Severance and infrastructure related cash payments associated with the other plans are expected to be paid out through fiscal 2019.


Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit PlansPlan
Separation Related Activities

In advance of the Separation, HP underwent a plan-by-plan analysis and determined which plans would be assigned to either HP or Hewlett Packard Enterprise. While some pension plans transitioned in their entirety to Hewlett Packard Enterprise or remain in their entirety with HP, other plans were split into two identical plans resulting in both companies splitting the plan’s assets and liabilities. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the plans were legally separated and the amounts attributable to Hewlett Packard Enterprise were transferred and reported as discontinued operations in fiscal year 2015.

The Hewlett-Packard Company 401(k) Plan, now known as the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan, remained with HP. A new 401(k) Plan was created for the employees of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Balances for Hewlett Packard Enterprise employees were transferred to the new plan post-Separation.

Defined Benefit Plans

HP sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans worldwide. The most significant defined benefit plans areplan, the HP Inc. Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) is in the U.S. The HP Pension Plan ("Pension Plan") includes the former HP Retirement Plan and the former HP Company Cash Account Pension Plan ("Cash Account Pension Plan"). Under the HP Retirement Plan, benefits are based on pay and years of service, and under the Cash Account Pension Plan, benefits are accrued pursuant to a formula based on a percentage of pay plus interest. The Pension Plan was frozen effective January 1, 2008. The Cash Account Pension Plan was merged into the Pension Plan in 2005 for certain funding and investment purposes. Effective October 30, 2009, the Electronic Data Systems Corporation ("EDS") U.S. qualified pension plan was merged into the Pension Plan. The EDS plan was frozen effective January 1, 2009.

United States.

HP reduces the benefit payable to certain U.S. employees under the Pension Plan for service before 1993, if any, by any amounts due to the employee under HP'sHP’s frozen defined contribution Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan ("DPSP"(“DPSP”). HP closedAt October 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of plan assets of the DPSP to new participants in 1993.was $580 million and $606 million, respectively. The DPSP obligations are equal to the plan assets and are recognized as an offset to the Pension Plan when HP


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

calculates its defined benefit pension cost and obligations. The fair value of plan assetsPension Plan and projected benefit obligations for the U.S. defined benefit plans combined with the DPSP were as follows:

both remain entirely with HP post-Separation.
 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 Plan Assets Projected
Benefit
Obligation
 Plan Assets Projected
Benefit
Obligation
 
 
 In millions
 

U.S. defined benefit plans

 $11,077 $12,716 $11,979 $13,756 

DPSP

  742  742  828  828 

Total

 $11,819 $13,458 $12,807 $14,584 

Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

HP sponsors retiree health and welfare benefit plans, of which the most significant are in the U.S.United States. Under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan, certain pre-2003 retirees and grandfathered participants with continuous service to HP since 2002 are eligible to receive partially-subsidized medical coverage based on years of service at retirement. Former grandfathered employees of Digital Equipment Corporation also receive partially-subsidized medical benefits that are not service-based. HP'sHP’s share of the premium cost is capped for all subsidized medical coverage provided under the HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan. HP currently leverages the employer group waiver plan process to provide HP Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan post-65 prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D, thereby giving HP access to federal subsidies to help pay for retiree benefits.

Certain employees not grandfathered for partially subsidized medical coverage under the above programs, as well asand employees hired after 2002 but before August 2008, are eligible for credits under the HP Retirement Medical Savings Account Plan ("RMSA") upon attaining age 45.Inc. Retiree Welfare Benefits Plan. Credits offered after September 2008 are provided in the form of matching credits on employee contributions made to a voluntary employee beneficiary association. Uponassociation upon attaining age 45 or as part of early retirement programs. On retirement, former employees may use these credits for the reimbursement of certain eligible medical expenses, including premiums required for coverage.

Defined Contribution Plans

HP offers various defined contribution plans for U.S. and non-U.S. employees. Total defined contribution expense was $542$103 million in fiscal 2015, $573year 2017, $100 million in fiscal 2014year 2016 and $603$92 million in fiscal 2013.

year 2015.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan (Continued)


U.S. employees are automatically enrolled in the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan when they meet eligibility requirements, unless they decline participation. The quarterly employer matching contributions in the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan areis 100% of an employee'semployee’s contributions, up to a maximum of 4% of eligible compensation.

Starting January 2017, the funding of employer matching contributions are made annually in the month following the end of the calendar year.  Prior to January 2017, the funding of employer matching contributions were made quarterly, sometime after the end of the calendar quarter.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

    Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Expense

        HP's net

The components of HP’s pension and post-retirement benefit (credit) cost recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings waswere as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 
 
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 In millions
 

Service cost

 $1 $1 $1 $326 $308 $337 $5 $5 $6 

Interest cost

  566  569  560  622  737  676  29  32  31 

Expected return on plan assets

  (818) (811) (845) (1,166) (1,140) (1,007) (39) (34) (34)

Amortization and deferrals:

                            

Actuarial loss (gain)

  54  15  77  441  318  341  (11) (10) 2 

Prior service benefit

        (21) (23) (27) (20) (41) (67)

Net periodic benefit (credit) cost

  (197) (226) (207) 202  200  320  (36) (48) (62)

Curtailment gain

          (7) (3)     (7)

Settlement loss

  114  1  12  4  12  18       

Special termination benefits

        25  50  31  1  32  (5)

Net benefit (credit) cost

 $(83)$(225)$(195)$231 $255 $366 $(35)$(16)$(74)
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 In millions
Service cost$
 $
 $1
 $48
 $47
 $208
 $1
 $1
 $5
Interest cost469
 543
 556
 18
 20
 289
 18
 20
 28
Expected return on plan assets(677) (732) (849) (31) (36) (601) (26) (33) (39)
Amortization and deferrals:   
  
    
  
    
  
Actuarial loss (gain)73
 55
 52
 40
 28
 213
 (17) (12) (11)
Prior service credit
 
 
 (3) (3) (15) (19) (17) (19)
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost(135) (134) (240) 72
 56
 94
 (43) (41) (36)
Curtailment gain
 
 
 
 (1) 
 
 
 
Settlement loss (gain)3
 180
 (79) 2
 3
 
 
 
 
Special termination benefits
 
 
 
 
 7
 
 4
 1
Plan expense allocation(1)

 
 
 
 
 25
 
 
 28
Total benefit (credit) cost from continuing operations$(132) $46
 $(319) $74
 $58
 $126
 $(43) $(37) $(7)
Summary of total benefit (credit) cost: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Continuing operations$(132) $46
 $(319) $74
 $58
 $126
 $(43) $(37) $(7)
Discontinued operations
 
 236
 
 
 105
 
 
 (28)
Total benefit (credit) cost$(132) $46
 $(83) $74
 $58
 $231
 $(43) $(37) $(35)


    (1)
    Plan expense allocation relates to the employees of HP covered under Hewlett Packard Enterprise plans or employees of Hewlett Packard Enterprise covered under HP plans.
    Lump sum program

        In January 2015,

During fiscal year 2016, HP offered certain terminated vested participants of the U.S. HP Pension Plan the option of receiving their pension benefit in a one-time voluntary lump sum withinduring a specific window. Approximately 16,000 plan participants elected to receive their benefits and as a result the pension plan trust paid $977 million in lump sum payments to these participants in fiscal year 2016. As a result of the lump sum program, HP recognized a settlement expense of approximately $177 million in October 2016. The resulting re-measurement coincided with annual year end plan re-measurement and no additional net periodic pension cost was incurred in fiscal year 2016.

In January 2015, HP offered certain terminated vested participants of the Pension Plan the option of receiving their pension benefit in a one-time voluntary lump sum during a specified window. Approximately 50% of the eligible participants elected to receive their benefits and as a result the pension plan trust paid $826 million in lump sum payments to these participants in fiscal year 2015. As a result of the lump sum program, HP recognized a settlement expensecredit of approximately $96$79 million andin fiscal year 2015. As a remeasurementresult of the U.S. HP Pension Plan was required. The remeasurement also resulted in ansettlement, additional net periodic benefit cost of $45$20 million forwas recorded in fiscal year 2015, which offset the actuarial gain from the settlement and was recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings along with theas Defined benefit plan settlement expense.

        During fiscal 2015, certain events, primarily the Separationcredits. 

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and settlement as a result of the lump sum program, required multiple pension plans to be remeasured during the year. Thus, the assumptions used to calculate the net benefit (credit) cost for the remaining portion of the fiscal year after remeasurement were re-determined based on then current market conditions.

Post-Retirement Benefit Plan (Continued)




The weighted-average assumptions used to calculate netthe total periodic benefit (credit) cost were as follows:


 For the fiscal years ended October 31 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015

 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans

Discount rate

 4.4% 4.9% 4.1% 3.0% 3.9% 3.8% 3.6% 3.9% 3.0%4.0% 4.4% 4.4% 1.6% 2.3% 3.0% 3.4% 3.6% 3.6%

Expected increase in compensation levels

 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4%    2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.7% 2.5% 2.4% 
 
 

Expected long-term return on plan assets

 7.2% 7.7% 7.8% 6.9% 7.0% 7.2% 9.0% 8.9% 9.0%6.9% 6.9% 7.2% 4.4% 5.6% 6.9% 7.3% 8.0% 9.0%

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

    Funded Status

The funded status of the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans was as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 
 
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 In millions
 

Change in fair value of plan assets:

                   

Fair value—beginning of year

 $11,979 $10,866 $17,570 $16,083 $458 $396 

Acquisition/addition of plans

  (1)   5  8     

Actual return on plan assets

  506  1,648  1,059  1,814  45  83 

Employer contributions

  29  27  619  1,019  39  92 

Participant contributions

      55  64  57  54 

Benefits paid

  (322) (558) (570) (568) (125) (167)

Settlement

  (1,114) (4) (17) (49)    

Currency impact

      (1,244) (801)    

Fair value—end of year

  11,077  11,979  17,477  17,570  474  458 

Change in benefit obligation:

                   

Projected benefit obligation—beginning of year

  13,756  11,866  21,220  19,152  840  867 

Acquisition/addition of plans

  (1)   1  10     

Service cost

  1  1  326  308  5  5 

Interest cost

  566  569  622  737  29  32 

Participant contributions

      55  64  57  54 

Actuarial (gain) loss

  (170) 1,882  457  2,500  (59) 22 

Benefits paid

  (322) (558) (570) (568) (126) (167)

Plan amendments

      (89)      

Curtailment

        (49)    

Settlement

  (1,114) (4) (17) (49)    

Special termination benefits

      25  50  1  32 

Currency impact

      (1,509) (935) (10) (5)

Projected benefit obligation—end of year

  12,716  13,756  20,521  21,220  737  840 

Funded status at end of year

 $(1,639)$(1,777)$(3,044)$(3,650)$(263)$(382)

Accumulated benefit obligation

 $12,715 $13,755 $19,695 $20,207       

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit PlansPlan (Continued)



 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 In millions
Change in fair value of plan assets: 
  
  
  
  
  
Fair value of assets — beginning of year$10,176
 $11,077
 $692
 $853
 $390
 $434
Actual return on plan assets1,223
 736
 86
 (14) 26
 11
Employer contributions33
 32
 27
 20
 9
 18
Participant contributions
 
 10
 10
 53
 48
Benefits paid(583) (339) (14) (15) (127) (121)
Settlement(11) (1,330) (6) (9) 
 
Currency impact
 
 20
 4
 
 
  Transfers to Hewlett Packard Enterprise
 
 
 (157) 
 
Fair value of assets — end of year$10,838
 $10,176
 $815
 $692
 $351
 $390
Change in benefits obligation 
  
  
  
  
  
Projected benefit obligation — beginning of year$12,144
 $12,709
 $1,120
 $1,082
 $535
 $597
Acquisition/addition of plans
 
 
 (2) 
 
Service cost
 
 48
 47
 1
 1
Interest cost469
 543
 18
 20
 18
 20
Participant contributions
 
 10
 10
 53
 48
Actuarial loss (gain)247
 561
 (77) 120
 (17) 16
Benefits paid(583) (339) (14) (15) (127) (121)
Plan amendments
 
 (3) 
 
 (30)
Curtailment
 
 
 (1) 
 
Settlement(11) (1,330) (6) (9) 
 
Special termination benefits
 
 
 
 
 4
Currency impact
 
 36
 (4) 
 
  Transfers to Hewlett Packard Enterprise
 
 
 (128) 
 
Projected benefit obligation — end of year$12,266
 $12,144
 $1,132
 $1,120
 $463
 $535
Funded status at end of year$(1,428) $(1,968) $(317) $(428) $(112) $(145)
Accumulated benefit obligation$12,266
 $12,144
 $1,014
 $1,013
 
 
 The weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the projected benefit obligations were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 
 
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 

Discount rate

  4.4% 4.4% 3.0% 3.2% 3.8% 3.6%

Expected increase in compensation levels

  2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 2.5%    

        For the U.S. defined benefit plans, HP adopted a new mortality table in fiscal 2014 to better reflect expected lifetimes of its U.S. plan participants. The table used is based on a historical demographic study of the plans and increased the projected benefit obligation by approximately $870 million for the yearfiscal years ended October 31, 2014. The increase in the projected benefit obligation in fiscal 2014 was recognized2017 and 2016 were as a part of the net actuarial loss as included in the other comprehensive loss which is being amortized over the remaining estimated life of plan participants.

follows:

 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
Discount rate3.8% 4.0% 2.0% 1.6% 3.5% 3.4%
Expected increase in compensation levels2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.7% 
 
The net amounts recognizedof non-current assets and current and non-current liabilities for HP'sHP’s defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans in HP'srecognized on HP’s Consolidated Balance SheetsSheet were as follows:

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan (Continued)


 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 
 
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 In millions
 

Noncurrent assets

 $ $ $532 $421 $ $ 

Current liabilities

  (37) (35) (42) (43) (46) (47)

Noncurrent liabilities

  (1,602) (1,742) (3,534) (4,028) (217) (335)

Funded status at end of year

 $(1,639)$(1,777)$(3,044)$(3,650)$(263)$(382)
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
     In millions      
Non-current assets$
 $
 $18
 $17
 $7
 $
Current liabilities(33) (33) (5) (5) (7) (9)
Non-current liabilities(1,395) (1,935) (330) (440) (112) (136)
Funded status at end of year$(1,428) $(1,968) $(317) $(428) $(112) $(145)

The following table summarizes the pretaxpre-tax net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service benefit recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans:

plans.

 
 As of October 31, 2015 
 
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 In millions
 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 $1,379 $5,161 $(173)

Prior service benefit

    (242) (99)

Total recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 $1,379 $4,919 $(272)
 As of October 31, 2017
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
   In millions  
Net actuarial loss (gain)$1,327
 $279
 $(106)
Prior service benefit
 (20) (93)
Total recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss$1,327
 $259
 $(199)

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

The following table summarizes theHP’s pre-tax net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service benefit that are expected to be amortized from accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive loss (income) and recognized as components of HP Inc.'s net periodic benefit cost (credit) cost during the next fiscal year.

 
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 In millions
 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 $55 $25 $(12)

Prior service benefit

    (3) (17)

Total expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit (credit) cost

 $55 $22 $(29)
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
   In millions  
Net actuarial loss (gain)$59
 $27
 $(17)
Prior service benefit
 (5) (18)
Total expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit)$59
 $22
 $(35)

Defined benefit plans with projected benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets were as follows:


 As of October 31 As of October 31

 2015 2014 2015 2014 2017 2016 2017 2016

 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans

 In millions
 In millions

Aggregate fair value of plan assets

 $11,077 $11,979 $8,928 $12,701 $10,838
 $10,176
 $750
 $626

Aggregate projected benefit obligation

 $12,716 $13,756 $12,504 $16,774 $12,266
 $12,144
 $1,085
 $1,070

Defined benefit plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets were as follows:


 As of October 31 As of October 31

 2015 2014 2015 2014 2017 2016 2017 2016

 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans

 In millions
 In millions

Aggregate fair value of plan assets

 $11,077 $11,979 $8,858 $12,578 $10,838
 $10,176
 $554
 $619

Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation

 $12,715 $13,755 $11,804 $15,797 $12,266
 $12,144
 $777
 $960

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit PlansPlan (Continued)



Fair Value of Plan Assets

Effective November 1, 2016, HP retrospectively adopted ASU 2015-07 "Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)," which removed the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the NAV per share as a practical expedient.

The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by asset category within the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2015.

 
 As of October 31, 2015 
 
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Post-Retirement Benefit Plans 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 In millions
 

Asset Category:

                                     

Equity securities

                                     

U.S. 

 $1,833 $47 $ $1,880 $2,851 $76 $ $2,927 $ $1 $ $1 

Non-U.S. 

  1,322  13    1,335  4,085  494  83  4,662         

Debt securities

                                     

Corporate

    3,238  31  3,269    3,352    3,352    28    28 

Government(1)

    1,756    1,756    1,534    1,534    39    39 

Alternative Investments

                                     

Private Equity(2)

      1,170  1,170    1  70  71      253  253 

Hybrids(3)

            2,670  30  2,700         

Hedge Funds(4)

    388  260  648  28  125  250  403         

Real Estate Funds

          464  49  571  1,084         

Insurance Group Annuity Contracts

            46  73  119         

Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(5)

    756    756    7    7    59    59 

Registered Investment Companies(6)

  38  176    214    1    1  92  3    95 

Cash and Cash Equivalents(7)

  38  203    241  493      493  4  3    7 

Other(8)

  (224) 32    (192) 68  14  42  124  (8)     (8)

Total

 $3,007 $6,609 $1,461 $11,077 $7,989 $8,369 $1,119 $17,477 $88 $133 $253 $474 

2017. Refer to Note 9, “Fair Value” for details on fair value hierarchy.
(1)
Includes debt issued
 As of October 31, 2017
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
 Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
 In millions
Asset Category:








 










 










 
Equity securities(1)
$3,174

$40

$

$3,214

$124

$6

$

$130

$

$

$

$
Debt securities(2)



































Corporate

3,379



3,379



152



152



25



25
Government

2,513



2,513



84



84



41



41
Real Estate Funds







2

51



53








Insurance Group Annuity Contracts









7



7








Common Collective Trusts + 103-12s









7



7








Registered Investment Companies(3)
89





89









54





54
Cash and Cash Equivalents(4)
8

64



72

33





33



2



2
Other(5)
(172)
(561)


(733)
5

9

1

15

(12)




(12)
Net plan assets subject to leveling$3,099

$5,435

$

$8,534

$164

$316

$1

$481

$42

$68

$

$110




































Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient:






















Alternative Investments(6)









1,444










13










198
Common Contractual Funds(7)






13







286








Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(8)









732





















39
Registered Investment Companies(3)






115







35







4
Investments at Fair Value





$10,838







$815







$351
The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by national, stateasset category within the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2016.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and local governments and agencies.Post-Retirement Benefit Plan (Continued)


(2)
 As of October 31, 2016
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Total
 In millions
Asset Category:

 

 


 
 

 

 

  
 

 

 


 
Equity securities(1)
$1,716
 $59
 $

$1,775
 $106
 $15
 $
 $121
 $
 $1
 $

$1
Debt securities(2)


 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Corporate
 3,132
 

3,132
 
 125
 
 125
 
 26
 

26
Government
 1,782
 

1,782
 
 63
 
 63
 
 42
 

42
Real Estate Funds
 
 


 1
 43
 
 44
 
 
 


Insurance Group Annuity Contracts
 
 


 
 6
 1
 7
 
 
 


Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investments Entities
 
 


 
 7
 
 7
 
 
 


Registered Investment Companies(3)
20
 
 

20
 
 
 
 
 54
 
 

54
Cash and Cash Equivalents(4)
4
 52
 

56
 18
 
 
 18
 
 5
 

5
Other(5)
(169) (23) 

(192) 7
 16
 
 23
 (12) 
 

(12)
Net plan assets subject to leveling$1,571
 $5,002
 $

$6,573
 $132
 $275
 $1
 $408
 $42
 $74
 $

$116



 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Investments using NAV as a Practical Expedient:
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Alternative Investments(6)


 

 


1,027
 

 

 

 13
 

 

 


219
Common Contractual Funds(7)


 

 


1,834
 

 

 

 241
 

 

 



Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(8)


 

 


639
 

 

 

 
 

 

 


51
Registered Investment Companies(3)


 

 


103
 

 

 

 30
 

 

 


4
Investments at Fair Value

 

 


$10,176
 

 

 

 $692
 

 

 


$390

(1)
Investments in publicly-traded equity securities are valued using the closing price on the measurement date as reported on the stock exchange on which the individual securities are traded.

(2)
The fair value of corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions. For corporate and government debt securities traded on active exchanges, fair value is based on observable quoted prices. Also included in this category is debt issued by national, state and local governments and agencies.

(3)
Includes publicly and privately traded Registered Investment Entities.

(4)
Includes cash and cash equivalents such as short-term marketable securities. Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds, which are valued based on NAV. Other assets were classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input (e.g., quoted prices and observable inputs) that is significant to the fair value measure in its entirety.

(5)
Includes reverse repurchase agreements, unsettled transactions, international insured contracts, and derivative instruments. Such unsettled transactions relate primarily to fixed income securities are settled in the first quarter of the next fiscal year. 2017 is the only year we have reverse repurchase agreements.

(6)
Alternative Investments primarily include private equities and hedge funds. The valuation of alternative investments, such as limited partnerships and joint ventures, may require significant management judgment. For alternative investments, valuation is based on NAV as reported by the Asset Manager and adjusted for cash flows, if necessary. In making such an assessment, a variety of factors are reviewed by management, including but not limited to the timeliness of NAV as reported by the asset manager and changes in general economic and market conditions subsequent to the last NAV reported by the asset manager.

Private equities include limited partnerships such as equity, buyout, venture capital, real estate and other similar funds
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan (Continued)


that invest in the U.S.United States and internationally where foreign currencies are hedged.


(3)
Includes a fund that invests in both private and public equities primarily in the U.S. and the United Kingdom, as well as emerging markets across all sectors. The fund also holds fixed income and derivative instruments to hedge interest rate and inflation risk. In addition, the fund includes units in transferable securities, collective investment schemes, money market
Hedge funds cash and deposits.

(4)
Includesinclude limited partnerships that invest both long and short primarily in common stocks and credit, relative value, event drivenevent-driven equity, distressed debt and macro strategies. Management of the hedge funds has the ability to shift investments from value to growth strategies, from small to large capitalization stocks and bonds, and from a net long position to a net short position.

(5)
Department of Labor 103-12 IE (Investment Entity) designation is for plan assets held by two or more unrelated employee benefit plans which includes limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships.

(6)
Includes publicly and privately traded Registered Investment Entities.

(7)
Includes cash and cash equivalents such as short-term marketable securities.

(8)
Includes primarily unsettled transactions, international insured contracts and derivative instruments. Such unsettled transactions relate primarily to fixed income securities to be settled in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

Table of Contents

(7)
The Common Contractual Fund is an investment arrangement in which institutional investors pool their assets. Units may be acquired in different sub-funds focused on equities, fixed income, alternative investments and emerging markets. Each sub-fund is invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective and units are issued in relation to each sub-fund. While the sub-funds are not publicly traded, the custodian strikes a net asset value either once or twice a month, depending on the sub-fund. These assets are valued using NAV as a practical expedient.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

        Changes in fair value measurements of Level 3 investments for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 were as follows:

(8)
Department of Labor 103-12 IE (Investment Entity) designation is for plan assets held by two or more unrelated employee benefit plans which includes limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships. Common collective trusts, interests in 103-12 entities and registered investment companies are valued using NAV as a practical expedient.

 
 For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 
 
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 Debt
Securities
 Alternative
Investments
  
 Equity Alternative
Investments
  
  
  
  
 Alternative
Investments
  
 
 
 Corporate
Debt
 Private
Equity
 Hybrids Hedge
Funds
 Total Non U.S.
Equities
 Private
Equity
 Hybrids Hedge
Funds
 Real
Estate
 Insurance
Group
Annuities
 Other Total Private
Equity
 Hybrids Total 
 
 In millions
 

Beginning balance at October 31, 2014

 $7 $1,284 $3 $263 $1,557 $80 $51 $43 $285 $543 $79 $2 $1,083 $271 $1 $272 

Actual return on plan assets:

                                                 

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date

    (25)   (3) (28) (18) (1)     13  (6) 3  (9) (2)   (2)

Relating to assets sold during the period

    145  (1)   144    7  (22)         (15) 46    46 

Purchases, sales, and settlements (net)

  24  (234) (2)   (212)   13    48  14  (2)   73  (62) (1) (63)

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

            21    9  (83) 1  2  37  (13)      

Ending balance at October 31, 2015

 $31 $1,170 $ $260 $1,461 $83 $70 $30 $250 $571 $73 $42 $1,119 $253 $ $253 
Plan Asset Allocations

        The table below sets forth the fair value of plan assets by asset category within

Refer to the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 2014.

 
 As of October 31, 2014 
 
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Post-Retirement Benefit Plans 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 In millions
 

Asset Category:

                                     

Equity securities

                                     

U.S. 

 $1,787 $ $ $1,787 $2,935 $30 $ $2,965 $ $ $ $ 

Non-U.S. 

  1,268      1,268  4,050  742  80  4,872         

Debt securities

                                     

Corporate

    3,283  7  3,290    2,935    2,935    20    20 

Government(1)

    2,204    2,204    1,787    1,787    22    22 

Alternative Investments

                                     

Private Equity(2)

      1,284  1,284    2  51  53      271  271 

Hybrids(3)

      3  3  114  2,466  43  2,623      1  1 

Hedge Funds(4)

    346  263  609    103  285  388         

Real Estate Funds

          220  277  543  1,040         

Insurance Group Annuity Contracts

            44  79  123         

Common Collective Trusts and 103-12 Investment Entities(5)

    854    854            55    55 

Registered Investment Companies(6)

  68  314    382          86  1    87 

Cash and Cash Equivalents(7)

  161  66    227  573      573    6    6 

Other(8)

  (24) 95    71  79  130  2  211  (4)     (4)

Total

 $3,260 $7,162 $1,557 $11,979 $7,971 $8,516 $1,083 $17,570 $82 $104 $272 $458 

(1)
Includes debt issued by national, state and local governments and agencies.

(2)
Includes limited partnerships such as equity, buyout, venture capital, real estate and other similar funds that invest intable above for actual assets allocations across the U.S. and internationally where foreign currencies are hedged.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

(3)
Includes a fund that invests in both private and public equities primarily in the U.S. and the United Kingdom, as well as emerging markets across all sectors. The fund also holds fixed income and derivative instruments to hedge interest rate and inflation risk. In addition, the fund includes units in transferable securities, collective investment schemes, money market funds, cash and deposits.

(4)
Includes limited partnerships that invest both long and short primarily in common stocks and credit, relative value, event driven equity, distressed debt and macro strategies. Management of the hedge funds has the ability to shift investments from value to growth strategies, from small to large capitalization stocks and bonds, and from a net long position to a net short position.

(5)
Department of Labor 103-12 IE (Investment Entity) designation is for plan assets held by two or more unrelated employee benefit plans which includes limited partnerships and venture capital partnerships.

(6)
Includes publicly and privately traded Registered Investment Entities.

(7)
Includes cash and cash equivalents such as short-term marketable securities.

(8)
Includes international insured contracts, derivative instruments and unsettled transactions.

        Changes in fair value measurements of Level 3 investments for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 
 
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 Debt
Securities
 Alternative
Investments
  
 Equity Alternative
Investments
  
  
  
  
 Alternative
Investments
  
 
 
 Corporate
Debt
 Private
Equity
 Hybrids Hedge
Funds
 Total Non U.S.
Equities
 Private
Equity
 Hybrids Hedge
Funds
 Real
Estate
 Insurance
Group
Annuities
 Other Total Private
Equity
 Hybrids Total 
 
 In millions
 

Beginning balance at October 31, 2013

 $ $1,250 $2 $113 $1,365 $77 $48 $ $204 $325 $81 $2 $737 $234 $1 $235 

Actual return on plan assets:

                                                 

Relating to assets still held at the reporting date               

    92  1  10  103  3  2    14  46  (8)   57  51    51 

Relating to assets sold during the period

    169      169    2    (1)       1  21    21 

Purchases, sales, and settlements (net)

  7  (227)   140  (80)   (1) 43  68  108  (2)   216  (35)   (35)

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

                    64  8    72       

Ending balance at October 31, 2014

 $7 $1,284 $3 $263 $1,557 $80 $51 $43 $285 $543 $79 $2 $1,083 $271 $1 $272 

        The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used to measure plan assets at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used during the reporting period.

        Investments in publicly-traded equity securities are valued using the closing price on the measurement date as reported on the stock exchange on which the individual securities are traded. For corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities, fair value is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions. For corporate and government debt securities traded on active exchanges, fair value is based on observable quoted prices. The valuation of alternative investments, such as limited partnerships and joint ventures, may require significant management judgment. For alternative investments, valuation is based on net asset value ("NAV") as reported by the Asset Manager and adjusted for cash flows, if necessary. In making such an assessment, a variety of factors


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

are reviewed by management, including, but not limited to, the timeliness of NAV as reported by the asset manager and changes in general economic and market conditions subsequent to the last NAV reported by the asset manager. Depending on the amount of management judgment, the lack of near-term liquidity, and the absence of quoted market prices, these assets are classified in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Further, depending on how quickly HP can redeem its hedge fund investments, and the extent of any adjustments to NAV, hedge funds are classified in either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Common collective trusts, interests in 103-12 entities and registered investment companies are valued at NAV. The valuation for some of these assets requires judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, and these assets are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Cash and cash equivalents includes money market funds, which are valued based on NAV. Other assets, including insurance group annuity contracts, were classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input (e.g., quoted prices and observable inputs) that is significant to the fair value measure in its entirety.

    Plan Asset Allocations

plans. The weighted-average target and actual asset allocations across the benefit plans atrepresented in the respective measurement datesfair value tables above were as follows:

 
 U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
  
 Plan Assets  
 Plan Assets  
 Plan Assets 
 
 2015
Target
Allocation
 2015
Target
Allocation
 2015
Target
Allocation
 
Asset Category
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 

Public equity securities

     34.2% 31.3%    45.7% 46.8%    10.7% 10.2%

Private/other equity securities

     16.4% 15.8%    15.9% 15.2%    53.4% 58.6%

Real estate and other

     (1.7)% 0.6%    6.9% 7.1%    (1.8)%  

Equity-related investments

  53.5% 48.9% 47.7% 66.4% 68.5% 69.1% 66.1% 62.3% 68.8%

Debt securities

  46.1% 47.5% 49.2% 33.4% 28.7% 27.6% 32.0% 33.2% 27.5%

Cash

  0.4% 3.6% 3.1% 0.2% 2.8% 3.3% 1.9% 4.5% 3.7%

Total

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

 2017 Target Allocation
Asset Category U.S. Defined Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
Equity-related investments 40.2% 40.6% 69.2%
Debt securities 59.8% 39.3% 18.8%
Real estate 
 6.3% 2.0%
Cash and cash equivalents 
 3.8% 10.0%
Other 
 10.0% 
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

    Investment Policy

        HP's

HP’s investment strategy is to seek a competitive rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk depending on the funded status of each plan and the timing of expected benefit payments. The majority of the plans'plans’ investment managers employ active investment management strategies with the goal of outperforming the broad markets in which they invest. Risk management practices include diversification across asset classes and investment styles and periodic rebalancing toward asset allocation targets. A number of the plans'plans’ investment managers are authorized to utilize derivatives for investment or liability exposures, and HP may utilize derivatives to effectaffect asset allocation changes or to hedge certain investment or liability exposures.

The target asset allocation selected for each U.S. plan reflects a risk/return profile HP believes is appropriate relative to each plan'splan’s liability structure and return goals. HP conducts periodic asset-liability studies for U.S. plans in order to model various potential asset allocations in comparison to each plan'splan’s forecasted liabilities and liquidity needs. HP invests a portion of the U.S. defined benefit


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

plan assets and post-retirement benefit plan assets in private market securities such as private equity funds to provide diversification and a higher expected return on assets.

Outside the U.S.,United States, asset allocation decisions are typically made by an independent board of trustees for the specific plan. As in the U.S.,United States, investment objectives are designed to generate returns that will enable the plan to meet its future obligations. In some countries, local regulations may restrict asset allocations, typically leading to a higher percentage of investment in fixed income securities than would otherwise be deployed. HP reviews the investment strategy
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan (Continued)


and provides a recommended list of investment managers for each country plan, with final decisions on asset allocation and investment managers made by the board of trustees for the specific plan.


Basis for Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets reflects the expected returns for each major asset class in which the plan invests and the weight of each asset class in the target mix. Expected asset returns reflect the current yield on government bonds, risk premiums for each asset class and expected real returns which considers each country'scountry’s specific inflation outlook. Because HP'sHP’s investment policy is to employ primarily active investment managers who seek to outperform the broader market, the expected returns are adjusted to reflect the expected additional returns net of fees.

Future Contributions and Funding Policy

        As of October 31, 2015,

In fiscal year 2018, HP (including Hewlett Packard Enterprise) expects to contribute approximately $384$24 million to its non-U.S. pension plans, and approximately $37$33 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and approximately $46$7 million to cover benefit claims for HP'sHP’s post-retirement benefit plans in fiscal 2016. Subsequent to the Separation, HP Inc. expects to contribute approximately $18 million to its non-U.S. pension plans, approximately $36 million to cover benefit payments to U.S. non-qualified plan participants and approximately $43 million to cover benefit claims for HP's post-retirement benefit plans in fiscal 2016. HP'splans. HP’s policy is to fund its pension plans so that it makes at least the minimum contribution required by local government, funding and taxing authorities.

Estimated Future Benefits Payments

As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP Inc. estimates that the future benefits payments for the retirement and post-retirement plans are as follows:

Fiscal year
 U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit Plans
 Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
  
U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Defined
Benefit Plans
 
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans

 In millions
  In millions

2016

 $879 $22 $82 

2017

 636 24 71 

2018

 645 26 58  $823
 $28
 $54

2019

 670 28 54  664
 30
 45

2020

 705 29 51  676
 27
 41

Next five fiscal years to October 31, 2025

 3,785 188 197 
2021 695
 30
 38
2022 720
 33
 35
Next five fiscal years to October 31, 2027 3,690
 210
 162

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4: Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (Continued)

    Separation related activities

        In advance of the Separation, HP underwent a plan-by-plan analysis in which it was determined if each plan would be assigned to HP Inc. or Hewlett Packard Enterprise. While some pension plans transitioned in their entirety to Hewlett Packard Enterprise or remain in their entirety with HP Inc., other plans were split into two identical plans resulting in both companies splitting the plan's assets and liabilities. As a result of these plan separations, HP Inc. will retain defined benefit plan assets of approximately $11,930 million, of which approximately $11,077 million pertain to the U.S. defined benefit plans. The projected benefit obligation for these defined benefit plans as of October 31, 2015 was $13,792 million, of which $12,709 million pertains to the U.S. defined benefit plans. The net funded status of these plans represents a net obligation which is recognized on HP Inc.'s Consolidated Balance Sheets for approximately $1,862 million of which $1,632 million pertains to the U.S. defined benefit plans. In addition, HP Inc. will retain post-retirement benefit plan assets of approximately $434 million. The projected benefit obligation for these post-retirement benefit plans as of October 31, 2015 was approximately $598 million. The net funded status of these plans represents a net obligation which is recognized on HP Inc.'s Consolidated Balance Sheets for approximately $164 million.

        The current Hewlett-Packard Company 401(k) Plan ("HP 401(k) Plan") will remain with HP Inc. A new 401(k) Plan was created for the employees of Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the respective balances were transferred after the Separation.




Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation

        HP's

HP’s stock-based compensation plans include incentive compensation plans and an employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP"(“ESPP”).

Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Related Income Tax Benefits

for Continuing Operations

Stock-based compensation expense and the resulting tax benefits for continuing operations were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years
ended October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Stock-based compensation expense

 $709 $560 $500 

Income tax benefit

  (208) (179) (158)

Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 $501 $381 $342 
 
For the fiscal years
ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Stock-based compensation expense$224
 $182
 $212
Income tax benefit(71) (63) (62)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax$153
 $119
 $150

In connection with the Separation and in accordance with the employee matters agreement, HP has made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of stock-based compensation awards with the intention of preserving the intrinsic value of the awards prior to the Separation. Exercisable and non-exercisable stock options have been converted to similar awards of the entity where the employee is working post-separation. Restricted stock unit awards and performance-contingent awards have been adjusted to provide holders with restricted stock units awards and performance-contingent awards in the company that employs such employee following the Separation. The pre-tax stock-based compensation expense due to the adjustments was $2 million in fiscal year 2016. All outstanding restricted stock units and stock options for employees transferred to Hewlett Packard Enterprise were canceled in connection with the Separation. The restricted stock units activity and stock options activity for fiscal year 2015 in the table below include discontinued operations, as the awards were not cancelled until the Separation became effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016.

In connection with the Separation, the Board of Directors approved amendments to certain outstanding long-term incentive awards on July 29, 2015. The amendments provided for the accelerated vesting on September 17, 2015 of certain stock-based awards that were otherwise scheduled to vest between September 18, 2015 and December 31, 2015. The pre-tax stock-based compensation expense due to the acceleration for continuing operations was approximately $76$23 million in fiscal year 2015.

Cash received from option exercises and purchases under the Hewlett-Packard Company 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2011 ESPP"“2011 ESPP”) was $0.4 billion$118 million in fiscal 2015, $0.3 billionyear 2017, $48 million in fiscal 2014year 2016 and $0.3 billion$206 million in fiscal 2013.year 2015. The benefit realized for the tax deduction from option exercises in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 was $75$15 million, $51$9 million and $13$30 million, respectively.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans

        HP's

HP’s stock-based incentive compensation plans include equity plans adopted in 2004 and 2000, as amended ("(“principal equity plans"plans”), as well as various equity plans assumed through acquisitions under which stock-based awards are outstanding. Stock-based awards granted fromunder the principal equity plans include restricted stock awards, stock options and performance-based awards. Employees meeting certain employment qualifications are eligible to receive stock-based awards.

Restricted stock awards are non-vested stock awards that may include grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards and cash-settled awards are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the lapse of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest one to three years from the date of grant. During the vesting period, ownership of the restricted stock cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same dividend and voting rights as common stock and is considered to be issued and outstanding upon grant. The dividends paid on restricted stock are non-forfeitable. Restricted stock units do not have the voting rights of common stock, and the shares underlying restricted stock units are not considered issued and outstanding upon grant. However, shares underlying restricted stock units are included in the calculation of diluted net EPS.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)


Restricted stock units have forfeitable dividend equivalent rights equal to the dividend paid on common stock. HP expenses the fair value of restricted stock awards ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse.

The majority of restricted stock units issued by HP contain only service vesting conditions. However, starting in fiscal year 2014, HP began granting performance-adjusted restricted stock units that vest only on the satisfaction of both service and market conditions prior to the expiration of the awards.

Stock options granted under the principal equity plans are generally non-qualified stock options, but the principal equity plans permit some options granted to qualify as incentive stock options under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Stock options generally vest over three to four years from the date of grant. The exercise price of a stock option is equal to the closing price of HP'sHP’s stock on the option grant date. The majority of stock options issued by HP contain only service vesting conditions. However, starting in fiscal year 2011, HP began granting performance-contingent stock options that vest only on the satisfaction of both service and market conditions prior to the expiration of the awards.

        In connection with


Restricted Stock Units
HP uses the Separation and in accordance withclosing stock price on the Employee Matters Agreement, HP will make certain adjustmentsgrant date to estimate the exercise price and number of share-based compensation awards with the intention of preserving the intrinsicfair value of service-based restricted stock units. HP estimates the awards prior to the separation. Exercisable and non-exercisable stock options will be converted to similar awardsfair value of the entity where the employee is working post-separation. Restricted stock unit awards and performance-contingent awards will be adjusted to provide holders restricted stock units subject to performance-adjusted vesting conditions using a combination of the closing stock price on the grant date and performance-contingent awardsthe Monte Carlo simulation model. The weighted-average fair value and the assumptions used to measure the fair value of restricted stock units subject to performance-adjusted vesting conditions in the company that employs such employee following the separation.

Monte Carlo simulation model were as follows:
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
Weighted-average fair value(1)
$20
 $13
 $47
Expected volatility(2)
30.5% 32.5% 33.6%
Risk-free interest rate(3)
1.4% 1.2% 1.0%
Expected performance period in years(4)
2.9
 2.9
 2.9

Table
(1)
The weighted-average fair value was based on performance-adjusted restricted stock units granted during the period.


(2)
The expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility derived from HP’s common stock.

(3)
The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.

(4)
The expected performance period was estimated based on the length of the remaining performance period from the grant date.

A summary of Contents


restricted stock units activity is as follows:

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

Restricted Stock Awards

        A summary of restricted stock awards activity is as follows:



 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 
 
 In thousands
  
 In thousands
  
 In thousands
  
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

  40,808 $24  32,262 $21  25,532 $31 

Granted and assumed through acquisition

  26,991 $35  26,036 $28  20,707 $15 

Vested

  (34,177)$26  (14,253)$24  (10,966)$33 

Forfeited

  (3,905)$29  (3,237)$22  (3,011)$24 

Outstanding at end of year

  29,717 $32  40,808 $24  32,262 $21 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 In thousands   In thousands   In thousands  
Outstanding at beginning of year28,710
 $13
 29,717
 $32
 40,808
 $24
Granted15,858
 $16
 29,286
 $10
 26,991
(1) 
$35
Vested(11,915) $14
 (4,161) $13
 (34,177) $26
Awards canceled due to Separation
 $
 (23,926) $32
 
 $
Forfeited(831) $14
 (2,206) $14
 (3,905) $29
Outstanding at end of year31,822
 $14
 28,710
 $13
 29,717
 $32

        In fiscal 2015, HP assumed approximately 8 million shares of restricted stock units through acquisition with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $33 per share.


(1)
In fiscal year 2015, HP assumed approximately 8 million shares of restricted stock units through acquisition with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $33 per share.
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock awardsunits vested in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 was $593$162 million, $234$54 million and $247$889 million, respectively, net of taxes.respectively. As of October 31, 2015,2017, total unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock awardsunits for continuing operations was $652$205 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.51.3 years.


Stock Options

HP utilizes the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula to estimate the fair value of stock options subject to service-based vesting conditions. HP estimates the fair value of stock options subject to performance-contingent vesting conditions using a combination of a Monte Carlo simulation model and a lattice model as these awards contain market conditions. The weighted-average fair value and the assumptions used to measure fair value were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 

Weighted-average fair value(1)

  $8  $7  $4 

Expected volatility(2)

  26.8% 33.1% 41.7%

Risk-free interest rate(3)

  1.7% 1.8% 1.1%

Expected dividend yield(4)

  1.8% 2.1% 3.6%

Expected term in years(5)

  5.9  5.7  5.9 

(1)
The weighted-average fair value was based on stock options granted during the period.
 
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 2017 2016 2015
Weighted-average fair value(1)
$4
 $4
 $8
Expected volatility(2)
28.0% 36.2% 26.8%
Risk-free interest rate(3)
1.9% 1.8% 1.7%
Expected dividend yield(4)
2.8% 3.5% 1.8%
Expected term in years(5)
5.5
 6.0
 5.9

Table of Contents

(1)
The weighted-average fair value was based on stock options granted during the period.


(2)
For all awards granted in fiscal year 2017 and 2016, expected volatility was estimated using the leverage-adjusted average of the term-matching volatilities of peer companies due to the lack of volume of forward traded options, which precluded the use of implied volatility. For all awards granted in fiscal year 2015, expected volatility was estimated using the implied volatility derived from options traded on HP’s common stock.

(3)
The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

(2)
For all awards granted in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2013, expected volatility was estimated using the implied volatility derived from options traded on HP's common stock. For awards granted in fiscal 2014, expected volatility for awards subject to service-based vesting was estimated using the implied volatility derived from options traded on HP's common stock, whereas for performance- contingent awards, expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility of HP's common stock.

(3)
The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on the yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues.
(4)
The expected dividend yield represents a constant dividend yield applied for the duration of the expected term of the award.


(4)
The expected dividend yield represents a constant dividend yield applied for the duration of the expected term of the award.

(5)
For awards subject to service-based vesting, the expected term was estimated using historical exercise and post-vesting termination patterns; and for performance-contingent awards, the expected term represents an output from the lattice model.

(5)
For awards subject to service-based vesting, due to the lack of historical exercise and post-vesting termination patterns of the post-Separation employee base, the expected term was estimated using a simplified method for all awards granted in fiscal year 2017 and 2016 and the expected term was estimated using historical exercise and post-vesting termination patterns for all awards granted in fiscal year 2015; and for performance-contingent awards, the expected term represents an output from the lattice model.
A summary of stock optionoptions activity is as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
 
 In thousands
  
 In years
 In millions
 In thousands
  
 In years
 In millions
 In thousands
  
 In years
 In millions
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

  57,853 $27        84,042 $27        87,296 $29       

Granted and assumed through acquisitions

  9,086 $36        9,575 $28        25,785 $15       

Exercised

  (12,845)$19        (11,145)$18        (10,063)$19       

Forfeited/cancelled/expired

  (17,816)$40        (24,619)$31        (18,976)$25       

Outstanding at end of year

  36,278 $26  5.1 $153  57,853 $27  4.3 $629  84,042 $27  3.9 $303 

Vested and expected to vest at end of year

  34,973 $26  5.0 $152  54,166 $27  4.1 $571  80,004 $27  3.7 $274 

Exercisable at end of year

  25,630 $24  4.4 $146  30,459 $33  2.3 $197  49,825 $33  1.8 $58 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 In
thousands
   In years In
millions
 In
thousands
   In years In
millions
 In
thousands
   In years In
millions
Outstanding at beginning of year28,218
 $12
    
 36,278
 $26
    
 57,853
 $27
    
Granted and assumed through acquisition104
 $19
   ��
 25,425
 $6
    
 9,086
 $36
    
Exercised(9,407) $11
    
 (4,714) $8
    
 (12,845) $19
    
Awards canceled due to Separation
 $
     (26,252) $26
     
 $
    
Forfeited/canceled/expired(848) $17
    
 (2,519) $17
    
 (17,816) $40
    
Outstanding at end of year18,067
 $13
 4.2 $152
 28,218
 $12
 5.0 $73
 36,278
 $26
 5.1 $153
Vested and expected to vest17,692
 $13
 4.1 $149
 26,850
 $12
 4.9 $71
 34,973
 $26
 5.0 $152
Exercisable10,898
 $12
 3.1 $102
 15,418
 $11
 3.7 $62
 25,630
 $24
 4.4 $146

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value that option holders would have received had all option holders exercised their options on the last trading day of fiscal 2015, 2014years 2017, 2016 and 2013.2015. The aggregate intrinsic value is the difference between HP'sHP’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal year and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 was $214$77 million, $151$26 million and $36$214 million, respectively. The total grant date fair value of options vested in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 was $59$19 million, $53$11 million and $64$131 million, respectively, net of taxes.

respectively.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)



The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable stock options:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 
 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise Prices
 Shares
Outstanding
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Shares
Exercisable
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
 
 In thousands
 In years
  
 In thousands
  
 

$0-$9.99

  221  3.9 $6  205 $7 

$10-$19.99

  9,863  4.5 $14  9,398 $14 

$20-$29.99

  15,775  4.9 $26  11,635 $25 

$30-$39.99

  8,858  6.7 $37  2,831 $37 

$40-$49.99

  1,322  1.3 $45  1,322 $45 

$50-$59.99

  239  2.3 $52  239 $52 

  36,278  5.1 $26  25,630 $24 
  As of October 31, 2017
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices Shares
Outstanding
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Shares
Exercisable
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  In thousands In years In thousands
$0-$9.99 1,226
 2.4 $7
 1,226
 $7
$10-$19.99 16,634
 4.3 $14
 9,465
 $13
$20-$29.99 207
 1.0 $23
 207
 $23
  18,067
 4.2 $13
 10,898
 $12

As of October 31, 2015,2017, total unrecognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for continuing operations was $46$5.7 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 1.90.8 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

HP sponsors the 2011 ESPP, pursuant to which eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of base compensation, subject to certain income limits, to purchase shares of HP'sHP’s common stock.

Pursuant to the terms of the 2011 ESPP, employees purchase stock under the 2011 ESPP at a price equal to 95% of HP'sHP’s closing stock price on the purchase date. No stock-based compensation expense was recorded in connection with those purchases because the criteria of a non-compensatory plan were met.

Shares Reserved

Shares available for future grant and shares reserved for future issuance under the stock-based incentive compensation plans and the 2011 ESPP were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In thousands
 

Shares available for future grant

  215,949  246,852  300,984 

Shares reserved for future issuance

  276,481  344,848  417,642 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In thousands
Shares available for future grant419,071
 453,865
 215,949
Shares reserved for future issuance468,531
 510,176
 276,481

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)




Note 6: Taxes on Earnings

Provision for Taxes

The domestic and foreign components of earnings (loss)from continuing operations before taxes were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years
ended October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

U.S. 

 $373 $2,565 $2,618 

Non-U.S. 

  4,359  3,992  3,892 

 $4,732 $6,557 $6,510 
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
U.S.$(14) $468
 $216
Non-U.S.3,290
 3,293
 3,316
 $3,276
 $3,761
 $3,532

The provision for (benefit from) taxes on earnings from continuing operations was as follows:


 For the fiscal years
ended October 31
 For the fiscal years ended October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015

 In millions
 In millions

U.S. federal taxes:

        
  
  

Current

 $(324)$381 $475 $189
 $439
 $(2,206)

Deferred

 (1,237) 210 (666)197
 470
 1,069

Non-U.S. taxes:

        
  
  

Current

 993 984 1,275 302
 288
 431

Deferred

 678 (42) 89 4
 (123) 76

State taxes:

        
  
  

Current

 210 212 57 20
 (35) 362

Deferred

 (142) (201) 167 38
 56
 82

 $178 $1,544 $1,397 $750
 $1,095
 $(186)

The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and HP'sHP’s effective tax rate were as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years
ended October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 

U.S. federal statutory income tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

  (4.6)% 0.4% 0.1%

Lower rates in other jurisdictions, net

  (16.2)% (12.9)% (24.5)%

Valuation allowances

  (23.4)% 1.7% 3.8%

Uncertain tax positions

  10.1% (2.3)% 4.1%

Other, net

  2.9% 1.6% 3.0%

  3.8% 23.5% 21.5%
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate from continuing operations35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State income taxes from continuing operations, net of federal tax benefit1.4 % 1.1 % (6.1)%
Lower rates in other jurisdictions, net(13.2)% (9.3)% (1.2)%
Research and development (“R&D”) credit(0.5)% (2.4)% (0.2)%
Valuation allowances(1.9)% (1.2)% (48.0)%
Uncertain tax positions0.4 % 11.7 % 11.1 %
Indemnification related items(0.3)% (4.1)%  %
Other, net2.0 % (1.7)% 4.1 %
 22.9 % 29.1 % (5.3)%

The jurisdictions with favorable tax rates that have the most significant effective tax rate impact in the periods presented include Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, Malaysia Ireland and Netherlands.Ireland. To


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)

the extent that HP plans to reinvest earnings of these jurisdictions indefinitely outside the United States, U.S. taxes have not been provided on those indefinitely reinvested earnings.


In fiscal year 2017, HP recorded $72 million of net income tax benefits related to discrete items in the provision for taxes. These amounts primarily include tax benefits of $84 million related to restructuring and other charges, $12 million related to U.S. federal provision to return adjustments, $45 million related to Samsung acquisition-related charges, and $13 million of other net tax benefits. In addition, HP recorded tax charges of $11 million related to changes in state valuation allowances, $22 million of state provision to return adjustments, and $49 million related to uncertain tax positions.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)


In fiscal year 2016, HP recorded $301 million of net income tax charges related to discrete items in the provision for taxes for continuing operations. These amounts primarily include uncertain tax positions charges of $525 million related to pre-separation tax matters. In addition, HP recorded $62 million of net tax benefits on restructuring and other charges, $52 million of net tax benefits related to the release of foreign valuation allowances and $41 million of net tax benefits arising from the retroactive research and development credit provided by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 signed into law in December 2015 and $70 million of other tax benefit.
In fiscal year 2015, HP recorded $1.6$1.2 billion of net income tax benefits related to discrete items unique toin the year.provision for taxes for continuing operations. These amounts included $1.8$1.7 billion of tax benefitbenefits due to a release of valuation allowances pertaining to certain U.S. deferred tax assets, and $486 million tax charge to record valuation allowances on certain foreign deferred tax assets, both related to legal entities within the ES business, $394 million of tax charges for adjustments to uncertain tax positions and the settlement of tax audit matters, inclusive of $449 million of tax charges related to uncertain tax positions on pension transfers, and $3$70 million of tax charges for various provisionbenefits related to return adjustmentsstate tax impacts, and other adjustments. In addition, HP recorded $639$6 million of net tax benefits on restructuring, separation-related, and other charges and a tax benefit of $47 million arising from the retroactive research and development credit resulting from the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014, which was signed into law in December 2014.

        In fiscal 2014, HP recorded $53 million of net income tax charges related to items unique to the year.

        In fiscal 2013, HP recorded $471 million of net income tax charges related to items unique to the year. These amounts included $214 million of net increases to valuation allowances, $406 million of tax charges for adjustments to uncertain tax positions and the settlement of tax audit matters and $47 million of tax charges for various prior period adjustments.other items. In addition, HP recorded $146$33 million of income tax charges on restructuring and pension-related costs.

In fiscal year 2017, in addition to the discrete items mentioned above, HP recorded excess tax benefits from adjustmentsof $19 million on stock options, restricted stock and performance share units, which are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as a component of the provision for income taxes as a result of the early adoption of ASU 2016-09 -“Improvements to prior year foreign income tax accruals and a tax benefitEmployee Share- Based Payment Accounting”. See Note 1, “Basis of $50 million arising fromPresentation”, for more details regarding the retroactive research and development credit resulting from the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which was signed into law in January 2013.

guidance.

As a result of certain employment actions and capital investments HP has undertaken, income from manufacturing and services in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates, and in some cases is wholly exempt from taxes, through 2026.2027. The gross income tax benefits attributable to these actions and investments were estimated to be $581$471 million ($0.320.28 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2015, $1.2 billion ($0.61 diluted net EPS) in fiscal 2014, $8272017, $341 million ($0.420.20 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2013.2016 and $322 million ($0.18 diluted net EPS) in fiscal year 2015. The gross income tax benefits were offset partially by accruals of U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings, among other factors.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)

Uncertain Tax Positions

A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Balance at beginning of year

 $4,128 $3,484 $2,573 

Increases:

          

For current year's tax positions

  1,942  304  290 

For prior years' tax positions

  4,673  593  997 

Decreases:

          

For prior years' tax positions

  (655) (125) (146)

Statute of limitations expirations

  (21) (46) (11)

Settlements with taxing authorities

  (90) (82) (219)

Balance at end of year

 $9,977 $4,128 $3,484 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Balance at beginning of year$10,858
 $6,546
 $1,545
Increases:   
  
For current year’s tax positions52
 468
 2,102
For prior years’ tax positions85
 4,004
 5,208
Decreases:   
  
For prior years’ tax positions(181) (62) (2,063)
Statute of limitations expirations(1) 
 (46)
Settlements with taxing authorities(5) (98) (200)
Balance at end of year$10,808
 $10,858
 $6,546

        Up to $3.0 billion, $2.2 billion and $1.9 billion

As of HP's unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, would affect HP's effective tax rate if realized. The $5.8 billion increase in2017, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year endedwas $10.8 billion, of which up to $3.9 billion would affect HP’s effective tax rate if realized. As of October 31, 2015 primarily relates2016 the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $10.9 billion of which up to the timing of intercompany royalty income recognition which does not$3.9 billion would affect HP'sHP’s effective tax rate.

rate if realized. HP continues to record its tax liabilities related to uncertain tax positions and certain liabilities for which it has joint and several liability with Hewlett Packard Enterprise. HP recognizes interest income from favorable settlements and interest expense and penalties accrued on unrecognized tax benefits in Provisionthe provision for taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. As of October 31, 2017, HP had accrued $357 million and $254$257 million for interest and penalties as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

penalties.

HP engages in continuous discussion and negotiation with taxing authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions. HP does not expectexpects to complete resolution of any U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") audit cyclecertain tax years with various tax authorities within the next 12 months. However, itIt is reasonablyalso possible that certainother federal, foreign and state tax issues may be concluded inwithin the next 12 months, including issues involving transfer pricing and other matters. Accordingly,months. HP believes it is reasonably possible that its existing unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced by an amount up to $144 million$2.7 billion within the next 12 months.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)


HP is subject to income tax in the U.S.United States and approximately 10558 other countries and is subject to routine corporate income tax audits in many of these jurisdictions. In addition, HP is subject to numerous ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. The IRS is conducting an audit of HP'sHP’s 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 20142015 income tax returns. HP has received from the IRS Notices of Deficiency for its fiscal 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2005 tax years, and Revenue Agent Reports ("RAR"(“RAR”) for its fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007 and 2008 tax years. The proposed IRS adjustments for these tax years would, if sustained, reduce the benefits of tax refund claims HP has filed for net operating loss carrybacks to earlier fiscal years and tax credit carryforwards to subsequent years by approximately $445$377 million. In addition, HP expects the IRS to issue an RAR for 2009 through 2011 relating to certain tax positions taken on the filed tax returns, including matters related to the U.S. taxation of certain intercompany loans. While the RAR may be material in amount, HP


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)

believes it has valid positions supporting its tax returns and, if necessary, it will vigorously defend such matters.

        HP has filed petitions with the U.S. Tax Court regarding certain proposed IRS adjustments regarding tax years 1999 through 2003 and is continuing to contest additional adjustments proposed by the IRS for other tax years.

The U.S. Tax Court ruled in May 2012 against HP regarding one ofrelated to certain tax attributes claimed by HP for the IRS adjustments for whichtax years 1999 through 2003. HP has filedappealed the U.S. Tax Court determination by filing a formal Notice of Appeal.Appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This case was argued before the Ninth Circuit in November 2016. The Ninth Circuit Court proceedings are expected to beginof Appeals issued its opinion in fiscal 2016.

        Pre-acquisition tax years of HP's U.S. group of subsidiaries providing enterprise services through 2004 have been audited byNovember 2017 affirming the IRS, and all proposed adjustments have been resolved. RARs have been received for tax years 2005, 2006, 2007 and the short period ended August 26, 2008, proposing total tax deficiencies of $274 million.Tax Court determinations. HP is contesting certain of these issues.

        The IRS began an audit in fiscal 2013 of the 2010 income tax return for HP's U.S. group of subsidiaries providing enterprise services, and has issued an RAR for the short period ended October 31, 2008 and the period ending October 31, 2009 proposing a total tax deficiency of $62 million. HP is contesting certain of these issues.

currently assessing whether or not to further appeal.

With respect to major state and foreign tax jurisdictions, HP is no longer subject to tax authority examinations for years prior to 1999. HP is subject to aNo material tax deficiencies have been assessed in major state or foreign tax audit concerning an intercompany transaction for fiscal 2009. The relevant taxing authority has proposed an assessmentjurisdictions as of approximately $733 million. HP is contesting this proposed assessment.

the reporting period.

HP believes it has provided adequate reserves for all tax deficiencies or reductions in tax benefits that could result from federal, state and foreign tax audits. HP regularly assesses the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of HP'sHP’s tax provision. HP adjusts its uncertain tax positions to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular audit. However, income tax audits are inherently unpredictable and there can be no assurance that HP will accurately predict the outcome of these audits. The amounts ultimately paid on resolution of an audit could be materially different from the amounts previously included in the Provision for taxes and therefore the resolution of one or more of these uncertainties in any particular period could have a material impact on net income or cash flows.

HP has not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on $47.2$21.7 billion of undistributed earnings from non-U.S. operations as of October 31, 20152017 because HP intends to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the U.S. If HP were to distribute these earnings, foreign tax credits may become available under current law to reduce the resulting U.S. income tax liability. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable. HP will remit non-indefinitely reinvested earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries for which deferred U.S. federal and withholding taxes have been provided where excess cash has accumulated and HP determines that it is advantageous for business operations, tax or cash management reasons.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)

Deferred Income Taxes

The significant components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)



 As of October 31 

 2015 2014 As of October 31

 Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
 Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
 2017 2016

 In millions
 Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities
 Deferred
Tax
Assets
 Deferred
Tax
Liabilities

Loss carryforwards

 $8,749 $ $9,476 $ 

Credit carryforwards

 453  2,377  
In millions
Loss and credit carryforwards$9,914
 $
 $8,725
 $

Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries

  8,450  7,828 
 (5,554) 
 (5,179)

Inventory valuation

 120 7 152 8 7
 (34) 
 (12)

Intercompany transactions—profit in inventory

 147  136  

Intercompany transactions—excluding inventory

 6,952  4,403  1,901
 
 2,560
 

Fixed assets

 377 64 383 74 256
 (8) 274
 

Warranty

 549  616  219
 
 248
 

Employee and retiree benefits

 1,872 31 2,790 57 519
 (3) 592
 

Accounts receivable allowance

 136 1 107 1 103
 
 117
 

Intangible assets

 74 546 212 596 16
 (209) 23
 (213)

Restructuring

 239  354  
Restructuring and other13
 
 17
 

Deferred revenue

 1,235 5 1,143 12 231
 
 206
 

Other

 2,215 1,486 1,573 1,145 372
 (4) 399
 (99)

Gross deferred tax assets and liabilities

 23,118 10,590 23,722 9,721 13,551
 (5,812) 13,161
 (5,503)

Valuation allowances

 (9,878)  (11,915)  (8,807) 
 (8,520) 

Net deferred tax assets and liabilities

 $13,240 $10,590 $11,807 $9,721 $4,744
 $(5,812) $4,641
 $(5,503)

        Current and long-term


 Long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Current deferred tax assets

 $2,242 $2,754 

Current deferred tax liabilities

  (168) (284)

Long-term deferred tax assets

  871  740��

Long-term deferred tax liabilities

  (295) (1,124)

Net deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities

 $2,650 $2,086 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Long-term deferred tax assets$342
 $254
Long-term deferred tax liabilities(1,410) (1,116)
Total$(1,068) $(862)

        Excess tax benefits of $64 million were recorded resulting from the exercise of employee stock options and other employee stock programs in fiscal 2015. Tax deficits of approximately $43 million and $149 million were recorded as a result of employee stock program activity and exercise of employee stock options, as a decrease in stockholders' equity in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively.

HP periodically engages in intercompany advanced royalty payment and licensing arrangements that may result in advance payments between subsidiaries in different tax jurisdictions. When the local


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)

tax treatment of the intercompany licensing arrangements differs from U.S. GAAP treatment, deferred taxes are recognized. During fiscal year 2017, fiscal year 2016 and fiscal year 2015, HP executed an intercompany advanced royalty payment arrangementarrangements resulting in advanced payments of $8.8$26 million, $1.2 billion, while during fiscal 2014, HP executed a multi-year intercompany licensing arrangement and an intercompany advanced royalty payment arrangement which resulted in combined advanced payments of $11.5$3.8 billion, respectively, the result of which was the recognition of zero net U.S. deferred tax assets in fiscal 2015year 2017, 2016 and $1.7 billion in fiscal 2014.2015. In these transactions, the payments were received in the U.S.United States from a foreign consolidated affiliate, with a deferral of intercompany revenues over the term of the arrangements, which is approximately 12 months for fiscal year 2017, 18 months for fiscal year 2016 and 5 years and 15 years, respectively.for fiscal year 2015. Intercompany royalty revenue and the amortization expense related to the licensing rights areis eliminated in consolidation.

        Separation costs are expenses associated with HP's plan to separate into two independent publicly-traded companies. HP recorded a deferred tax asset on these costs and expenses as they were incurred through fiscal 2015. HP expects a portion of these deferred tax assets associated with separation costs and expenses will be non-deductible expenses, at the time the Separation is executed. Furthermore, HP has also concluded on the legal form of the Separation and in May 2015 announced that Hewlett Packard Enterprise will be the spinnee in the U.S. Accordingly, during the second half of fiscal 2015, HP implemented certain internal reorganizations of, and transactions among, its wholly owned subsidiaries and operating activities in preparation for the legal form of Separation. As a result, HP recorded adjustments to certain deferred and prepaid tax assets as well as income tax liabilities reflecting the impact of separation related activities.


As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP had $971$678 million, $6.1$2.5 billion and $26.8$28.1 billion of federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards, respectively. Amounts included in each of these respective totalsstate and foreign net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2023, 2016year 2018 and 2016, respectively.amounts included in federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2024. HP also has capital loss carryforwards of approximately $26$8 million, which will expire in fiscal 2020.2021, and charitable contributions of $30 million, which will expire in 2022. HP has provided a valuation allowance of $106$93 million and $8.2$8.5 billion for deferred tax assets related to the state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards, respectively.

respectively, that HP does not expect to realize.

As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP had recorded deferred tax assets for various tax credit carryforwards as follows:

 
 Carryforward Valuation
Allowance
 Initial
Year of
Expiration
 
 
 In millions
  
 

U.S. foreign tax credits

 $46 $  2021 

U.S. R&D and other credits

  47    2017 

Tax credits in state and foreign jurisdictions

  360  (223) 2016 

Balance at end of year

 $453 $(223)   

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6: Taxes on Earnings (Continued)



 Carryforward Valuation
Allowance
 Initial
Year of
Expiration
 In millions
U.S. foreign tax credits$1,050
 $
 2022
U.S. R&D and other credits920
 
 2018
Tax credits in state and foreign jurisdictions288
 (115) 2021
Balance at end of year$2,258
 $(115)  
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance

The deferred tax asset valuation allowance and changes were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Balance at beginning of year

 $11,915 $11,390 $10,223 

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (1,657) 184  1,644 

Other comprehensive income, currency translation and charges to other accounts

  (380) 341  (477)

Balance at end of year

 $9,878 $11,915 $11,390 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Balance at beginning of year$8,520
 $7,114
 $8,231
Income tax expense (benefit)297
 1,421
 (2,183)
Other comprehensive income, currency translation and charges to other accounts(10) (15) 1,066
Balance at end of year$8,807
 $8,520
 $7,114

Gross deferred tax assets at October 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015, were reduced by valuation allowances of $9.9$8.8 billion, $11.9$8.5 billion and $11.4$7.1 billion, respectively. Total valuation allowance increased by $0.3 billion in fiscal year 2017, and increased by $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2016, both years associated primarily with foreign net operating losses, and decreased by $2$1.1 billion in fiscal 2015, associated with the reversalrelease of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in the U.S., and increased by $525 million in fiscal 2014, associated primarily with foreign net operating losses.

United States.

Tax Matters Agreement and Other Income Tax Matters

In connection with the Separation, HP entered into a Tax Matters Agreement (the "Tax Matters Agreement"the tax matters agreement (“TMA”) with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, effective on November 1, 2015, that governs the rights and obligations of HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain pre-Separation tax liabilities. The Tax Matters AgreementTMA provides that HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise will share certain pre-Separation income tax liabilities that arise from adjustments made by tax authorities to HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise's U.S. and certain non-U.S. income tax returns.liabilities. In certain jurisdictions, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise have joint and several liability for past income tax liabilities and accordingly, HP could be legally liable under applicable tax law for such liabilities and required to make additional tax payments.

In addition, if the distribution of Hewlett Packard Enterprise'sEnterprise’s common shares to the HP stockholders is determined to be taxable, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP would share the tax liability equally, unless the taxability of the distribution is the direct result of action taken by either Hewlett Packard Enterprise or HP subsequent to the distribution, in which case the party causing the distribution to be taxable would be responsible for any taxes imposed on the distribution.

Upon completion of the Separation on November 1, 2015, HP recorded a net payable toincome tax indemnification receivables from Hewlett Packard Enterprise of $390 million for certain income tax liabilities that Hewlett Packard EnterpriseHP is jointjointly and severally liable for, but for which it is indemnified by HPHewlett Packard Enterprise under the Tax Matters Agreement.TMA. The actual amount that HPHewlett Packard Enterprise may be obligated to pay HP could vary depending upon the outcome of certain unresolved tax matters, which may not be resolved for several years.

The net receivable as of October 31, 2017 and October 31, 2016 was $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively.

Table of Contents


Note 7: Supplementary Financial Information
Accounts Receivable
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7: Balance Sheet DetailsSupplementary Financial Information (Continued)

        Balance sheet details were as follows:

Accounts Receivable, Net


 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Accounts receivable

 $13,552 $14,064 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  (189) (232)

 $13,363 $13,832 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Accounts receivable$4,515
 $4,221
Allowance for doubtful accounts(101) (107)
 $4,414
 $4,114

The allowance for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable and changes were as follows:


 As of October 31 As of October 31

 2015 2014 2013 2017 2016 2015

 In millions
 In millions

Balance at beginning of year

 $232 $332 $464 $107
 $80
 $106

Provision for doubtful accounts

 46 25 23 30
 65
 19

Deductions, net of recoveries

 (89) (125) (155)(36) (38) (45)

Balance at end of year

 $189 $232 $332 $101
 $107
 $80

HP has third-party arrangements, consisting of revolving short-term financing, arrangements intendedwhich provide liquidity to certain partners in order to facilitate thetheir working capital requirementsrequirements. These financing arrangements, which in certain circumstances may contain partial recourse, result in a transfer of certain customers.HP’s receivables and risk, to the third-party. As these transfers qualify as true sales under the applicable accounting guidance, the receivables are derecognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon transfer, and HP receives a payment for the receivables from the third-party within a mutually agreed upon time period. For arrangements involving an element of recourse, the recourse obligation is measured using market data from the similar transactions and reported as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum, utilizedrecourse obligations as of October 31, 2017 and available program capacity2016 were not material. The costs associated with the sales of trade receivables for fiscal year 2017 and 2016 were not material.
The following is a summary of the activity under these short-term financing arrangements was as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Non-recourse arrangements:

       

Maximum program capacity

 $1,427 $1,083 

Utilized capacity(1)(2)

  (568) (613)

Available capacity

 $859 $470 

Partial-recourse arrangements:

       

Maximum program capacity

 $1,860 $1,877 

Utilized capacity(1)(2)

  (1,381) (1,500)

Available capacity

 $479 $377 

Total arrangements:

       

Maximum program capacity

 $3,287 $2,960 

Utilized capacity(1)(2)

  (1,949) (2,113)

Available capacity

 $1,338 $847 

arrangements:
 As of October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Balance at beginning of year (1)
$149
 $93
 $271
Trade receivables sold9,553
 8,222
 6,512
Cash receipts(9,562) (8,160) (6,671)
Foreign currency and other7
 (6) (19)
Balance at end of year (1)
$147
 $149
 $93

(1)
Utilized capacity represents the receivables sold toAmounts outstanding from third parties but not collected fromreported in Accounts Receivable in the customer by the third parties.
Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Table of Contents


Inventory
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Finished goods$3,857
 $3,103
Purchased parts and fabricated assemblies1,929
 1,381
 $5,786
 $4,484
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7: Balance Sheet DetailsSupplementary Financial Information (Continued)

(2)
HP reflects the amounts transferred to, but not yet collected from, third parties in Accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts, included in the utilized capacity are as follows:



Other Current Assets
 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Non-recourse arrangements

 $21 $78 

Partial-recourse arrangements

  140  381 

Total arrangements

 $161 $459 

        The activity related to HP's revolving short-term financing arrangements was as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Balance at beginning of year(1)

 $459 $172 $228 

Trade receivables sold(2)

  10,733  9,627  4,241 

Cash receipts(2)

  (10,998) (9,306) (4,305)

Foreign currency and other

  (33) (34) 8 

Balance at end of year(1)

 $161 $459 $172 

 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Value-added taxes receivable$857
 $795
Available-for-sale investments (1)
1,149
 
Supplier and other receivables1,891
 1,700
Prepaid and other current assets1,224
 1,087
 $5,121
 $3,582
(1)
Beginning
(1)
See Note 9, “Fair Value” and Note 10, “Financial Instruments” for detailed information.

Property, Plant and ending balance represents amounts for trade receivables sold but not yet collected.

(2)
In fiscal 2014, HP revised the presentation for the trade receivables sold and the cash received under the short-term financing arrangements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 in order to present comparable information with that period.
Equipment, Net

Inventory

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Finished goods

 $4,337 $3,973 

Purchased parts and fabricated assemblies

  2,148  2,442 

 $6,485 $6,415 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements$2,082
 $2,421
Machinery and equipment, including equipment held for lease3,876
 3,663
 5,958
 6,084
Accumulated depreciation(4,080) (4,348)
 $1,878
 $1,736
Depreciation expense was $353 million, $316 million and $302 million in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Other Non-Current Assets
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Tax indemnifications receivable(1)
$1,695
 $1,591
Deferred tax assets342
 254
Other(2)
1,058
 1,316
 $3,095
 $3,161

Table of Contents

(1)
In connection with the TMA discussed under Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”.
(2)
Includes available-for-sale investments of $61 million and $55 million at October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7: Balance Sheet DetailsSupplementary Financial Information (Continued)

Other Current Assets

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Deferred tax assets—short-term

 $2,242 $2,754 

Value-added taxes receivable

  2,481  2,169 

Supplier and other receivables

  2,749  2,378 

Prepaid and other current assets

  4,116  4,518 

 $11,588 $11,819 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Land

 $537 $540 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

  9,172  9,048 

Machinery and equipment, including equipment held for lease

  16,766  16,664 

  26,475  26,252 

Accumulated depreciation

  (15,385) (14,912)

 $11,090 $11,340 

        Depreciation expense was $3.1 billion, $3.3 billion and $3.2 billion in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The change in gross property, plant and equipment was due primarily to purchases of $3.7 billion, which were partially offset by sales and retirements totaling $2.9 billion and unfavorable currency impacts of $0.5 billion. Accumulated depreciation associated with the assets sold and retired in fiscal 2015 was $2.5 billion.

Long-Term Financing Receivables and Other Assets

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Financing receivables, net

 $3,676 $3,613 

Deferred tax assets

  871  740 

Deferred costs

  742  755 

Other

  3,761  3,346 

 $9,050 $8,454 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7: Balance Sheet Details (Continued)

Other Accrued Liabilities

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Accrued taxes—other

 $2,371 $2,269 

Warranty

  1,147  1,325 

Sales and marketing programs

  3,089  2,986 

Other

  5,417  5,499 

 $12,024 $12,079 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Other accrued taxes$895
 $755
Warranty660
 729
Sales and marketing programs2,441
 2,312
Other1,945
 1,922
 $5,941
 $5,718


Other Non-Current Liabilities

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Pension, post-retirement, and post-employment liabilities

 $5,630 $6,379 

Deferred revenue—long-term

  4,373  3,931 

Deferred tax liability—long-term

  295  1,124 

Tax liability—long-term

  2,593  2,861 

Other long-term liabilities

  1,869  2,010 

 $14,760 $16,305 
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
Pension, post-retirement, and post-employment liabilities$1,999
 $2,705
Deferred tax liability1,410
 1,116
Tax liability2,005
 1,910
Deferred revenue921
 865
Other827
 737
 $7,162
 $7,333


Interest and other, net
 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Interest expense on borrowings$(309) $(273) $(167)
Tax indemnifications(1)
47
 472
 
Foreign exchange loss(70) (76) (304)
Other, net89
 89
 83
 $(243) $212
 $(388)
(1)
In connection with the TMA discussed under Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”.

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases

        Financing receivables represent sales-type and direct-financing leases of HP and third-party products. These receivables typically have terms ranging from two to five years and are usually


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases (Continued)

collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets. Financing receivables also include billed receivables from operating leases. The components of financing receivables were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Minimum lease payments receivable

 $7,000 $6,982 

Unguaranteed residual value

  217  235 

Unearned income

  (528) (547)

Financing receivables, gross

  6,689  6,670 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  (95) (111)

Financing receivables, net

  6,594  6,559 

Less: current portion(1)

  (2,918) (2,946)

Amounts due after one year, net(1)

 $3,676 $3,613 

Goodwill
(1)
HP includes the current portion in Financing receivables and amounts due after one year, net in Long-term financing receivables and other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        As of October 31, 2015, scheduled maturities of HP's minimum lease payments receivable were as follows:

Fiscal year
 In millions 

2016

 $3,176 

2017

  1,922 

2018

  1,144 

2019

  526 

2020

  194 

Thereafter

  38 

Total

 $7,000 

    Credit Quality Indicators

        Due to the homogenous nature of its leasing transactions, HP manages its financing receivables on an aggregate basis when assessing and monitoring credit risk. Credit risk is generally diversified due to the large number of entities comprising HP's customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic regions. HP evaluates the credit quality of an obligor at lease inception and monitors that credit quality over the term of a transaction. HP assigns risk ratings to each lease based on the creditworthiness of the obligor and other variables that augment or mitigate the inherent credit risk of a particular transaction. Such variables include the underlying value and liquidity of the collateral, the essential use of the equipment, the term of the lease, and the inclusion of credit enhancements, such as guarantees, letters of credit or security deposits. HP classifies accounts as high risk when it considers the financing receivable to be impaired or when management believes there is a significant near-term risk of impairment.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases (Continued)

        The credit risk profile of gross financing receivables, based on internally assigned ratings, was as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Risk Rating:

       

Low

 $3,458 $3,536 

Moderate

  3,158  3,022 

High

  73  112 

Total

 $6,689 $6,670 

    Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        The allowance for doubtful accounts for financing receivables is comprised of a general reserve and a specific reserve. HP maintains general reserve percentages on a regional basis and bases such percentages on several factors, including consideration of historical credit losses and portfolio delinquencies, trends in the overall weighted-average risk rating of the portfolio, current economic conditions and information derived from competitive benchmarking. HP excludes accounts evaluated as part of the specific reserve from the general reserve analysis. HP establishes a specific reserve for financing receivables with identified exposures, such as customer defaults, bankruptcy or other events, that make it unlikely HP will recover its investment. For individually evaluated receivables, HP determines the expected cash flow for the receivable, which includes consideration of estimated proceeds from disposition of the collateral, and calculates an estimate of the potential loss and the probability of loss. For those accounts where a loss is considered probable, HP records a specific reserve. HP generally writes off a receivable or records a specific reserve when a receivable becomes 180 days past due, or sooner if HP determines that the receivable is not collectible.

        The allowance for doubtful accounts related to financing receivables and changes were as follows:

 
 As of October 31 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Balance at beginning of year

 $111 $131 $149 

Provision for doubtful accounts

  25  30  38 

Deductions, net of recoveries

  (41) (50) (56)

Balance at end of year

 $95 $111 $131 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases (Continued)

        The gross financing receivables and related allowance evaluated for loss were as follows:

 
 As of
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Gross financing receivables collectively evaluated for loss

 $6,433 $6,378 

Gross financing receivables individually evaluated for loss

  256  292 

Total

 $6,689 $6,670 

Allowance for financing receivables collectively evaluated for loss

 $82 $92 

Allowance for financing receivables individually evaluated for loss

  13  19 

Total

 $95 $111 

Non-Accrual and Past-Due Financing Receivables

        HP considers a financing receivable to be past due when the minimum payment is not received by the contractually specified due date. HP generally places financing receivables on non-accrual status, which is suspension of interest accrual, and considers such receivables to be non-performing at the earlier of the time at which full payment of principal and interest becomes doubtful or the receivable becomes 90 days past due. Subsequently, HP may recognize revenue on non-accrual financing receivables as payments are received, which is on a cash basis, if HP deems the recorded financing receivable to be fully collectible; however, if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of the recorded financing receivable, all cash receipts are applied to the carrying amount of the financing receivable, which is the cost recovery method. In certain circumstances, such as when HP deems a delinquency to be of an administrative nature, financing receivables may accrue interest after becoming 90 days past due. The non-accrual status of a financing receivable may not impact a customer's risk rating. After all of a customer's delinquent principal and interest balances are settled, HP may return the related financing receivable to accrual status.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the aging and non-accrual status of gross financing receivables:

 
 As of
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Billed(1):

       

Current 1-30 days

 $358 $243 

Past due 31-60 days

  52  46 

Past due 61-90 days

  14  12 

Past due >90 days

  57  49 

Unbilled sales-type and direct-financing lease receivables

  6,208  6,320 

Total gross financing receivables

 $6,689 $6,670 

Gross financing receivables on non-accrual status(2)

 $154 $130 

Gross financing receivables 90 days past due and still accruing interest(2)

 $102 $162 

(1)
Includes billed operating lease receivables and billed sales-type and direct-financing lease receivables.

(2)
Includes billed operating lease receivables and billed and unbilled sales-type and direct-financing lease receivables.

    Operating Leases

        Operating lease assets included in machinery and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:

 
 As of
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 In millions
 

Equipment leased to customers

 $4,077 $3,977 

Accumulated depreciation

  (1,367) (1,382)

 $2,710 $2,595 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8: Financing Receivables and Operating Leases (Continued)

        As of October 31, 2015, minimum future rentals on non-cancelable operating leases related to leased equipment were as follows:

Fiscal year
 In millions 

2016

 $1,439 

2017

  973 

2018

  508 

2019

  200 

2020

  70 

Thereafter

  17 

Total

 $3,207 

Note 9: Acquisitions and Divestitures

    Acquisitions

        In fiscal 2015, HP completed five acquisitions. The purchase price allocation for these acquisitions as set forth in the table below reflects various preliminary fair value estimates and analyses, including preliminary work performed by third-party valuation specialists, which are subject to change within the measurement period as valuations are finalized. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to the fair values of certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired, the valuation of intangible assets acquired, certain legal matters, income and non-income based taxes, and residual goodwill. HP expects to continue to obtain information to assist it in determining the fair value of the net assets acquired at the acquisition date during the measurement period. Measurement period adjustments that HP determines to be material will be applied retrospectively to the period of acquisition in HP's Consolidated Financial Statements and, depending on the nature of the adjustments, other periods subsequent to the period of acquisition could also be affected.

        Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to HP's consolidated results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate. Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, is not deductible for tax purposes.

        The following table presents the aggregate purchase price allocation, including those items that are still preliminary allocations, for HP's acquisitions in fiscal 2015:

 
 In millions 

Goodwill

 $1,987 

Amortizable intangible assets

  704 

In-process research and development

  159 

Net assets assumed

  221 

Total fair value of consideration

 $3,071 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9: Acquisitions and Divestitures (Continued)

    Acquisition of Aruba

        HP's largest acquisition in fiscal 2015 was the acquisition of Aruba, which was completed in May 2015. Aruba is a leading provider of next-generation network access solutions for the mobile enterprise. HP reported the financial results of Aruba's business in the Networking business unit within the EG segment. The acquisition date fair value of consideration of $2.8 billion consisted of cash paid for outstanding common stock, vested in-the-money stock awards and the estimated fair value of earned unvested stock awards assumed by HP. In connection with this acquisition, HP recorded approximately $1.8 billion of goodwill, $643 million of intangible assets and $153 million of IPR&D. HP is amortizing the intangible assets on a straight-line basis over an estimated weighted-average life of six years.

    Acquisitions in prior year

        In fiscal 2014, HP completed two acquisitions with a combined purchase price of $55 million, of which $12 million was recorded as goodwill and $25 million was recorded as intangible assets related to these acquisitions.

    Divestitures

        In fiscal 2015, HP completed five divestitures which resulted in $246 million of proceeds. These divestitures included HP's sale of its web-based photo sharing and photo printing service, Snapfish. Snapfish was previously reported within the Consumer Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. Additionally, HP completed the sales of its LiveVault and iManage businesses, which were previously reported within the Software segment. The gains associated with these divestitures were included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

        In May 2015, HP and Tsinghua Holdings jointly announced a partnership that will bring together the Chinese enterprise technology assets of Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Tsinghua University to create a Chinese provider of technology infrastructure. Under the definitive agreement, Tsinghua Holdings' subsidiary, Unisplendour Corporation, will purchase 51% of a new business called H3C, comprising Hewlett Packard Enterprise's current H3C Technologies and China-based server, storage and technology services businesses, for approximately $2.3 billion. Hewlett Packard Enterprise China will maintain 100% ownership of its existing China-based ES, Aruba, Software and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Helion Cloud businesses. Once the transaction closes, the new H3C will be the exclusive provider for Hewlett Packard Enterprise's server, storage and networking portfolio, as well as Hewlett Packard Enterprise's exclusive hardware support services provider in China, customized for that market. The transaction will be a part of Hewlett Packard Enterprise as a result of the Separation and is expected to close during the first quarter of fiscal 2016, subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions.

        In October 2015, HP signed a definitive agreement to sell the TippingPoint business to Trend Micro International for approximately $300 million. TippingPoint is a provider of next-generation intrusion prevention systems and related network security solutions. The results of TippingPoint were recorded within the Software segment. The transaction will be a part of Hewlett Packard Enterprise as a result of the Separation and is expected to close during the first quarter of fiscal 2016, subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10: Goodwill and Intangible Assets

    Goodwill

Goodwill allocated to HP'sHP’s reportable segments and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:

 
 Personal
Systems
 Printing Enterprise
Group
 Enterprise
Services(3)
 Software HP
Financial
Services
 Corporate
Investments
 Total 
 
 In millions
 

Balance at October 31, 2013(1)(2)

 $2,588 $3,103 $16,864 $97 $8,328 $144 $ $31,124 

Goodwill acquired during the period

          12      12 

Goodwill adjustments

      3          3 

Balance at October 31, 2014(1)(2)

 $2,588 $3,103 $16,867 $97 $8,340 $144 $ $31,139 

Goodwill acquired during the period

      1,891    96      1,987 

Goodwill adjustments

    (11) (46) (5) (123)     (185)

Balance at October 31, 2015(1)

 $2,588 $3,092 $18,712 $92 $8,313 $144 $ $32,941 

(1)
Goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $14.5 billion. Of that amount, $8.0 billion relatesHP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the ES segment, $5.7 billion relates to Software, and the remaining $0.8 billion relates to Corporate Investments.Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


(2)
In connection with the Separation, effective at the beginning of its fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, HP implemented an organizational change which resulted in the transfer of the marketing optimization solutions business from the Software segment to the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. As a result, HP reclassified $512 million of goodwill related to the marketing optimization solutions business from the Software segment to the Printing segment. The reclassification has been reflected retrospectively for all periods presented above.

 Personal
Systems
 Printing Total
 In millions
Balance at October 31, 2015(1)
$2,588
 $3,092
 $5,680
Acquisitions5
 
 5
Dispositions(2)

 (63) (63)
Balance at October 31, 2016(1)
2,593
 3,029
 5,622
Acquisitions
 
 
Dispositions
 
 
Balance at October 31, 2017(1)
$2,593
 $3,029
 $5,622

(3)
Goodwill relates to the MphasiS Limited reporting unit.

        In fiscal 2015, HP recorded approximately $2.0 billion of goodwill related to acquisitions based on its preliminary fair value estimates of the assets acquired. Goodwill adjustments primarily relate to the allocation of goodwill to the LiveVault, Snapfish and iManage businesses, which were sold during the period.

    Goodwill Impairments

(1)
Goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $0.8 billion related to Corporate Investments.


(2)
Divestiture of technology assets, including licensing and distribution rights, for certain software offerings to Open Text Corporation. See Note 18, “Divestitures”.

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. As of October 31, 2015,2017, our reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 2, except for ES, which includes two reporting units: MphasiS Limited; and the remainder of ES. Based on the results of its annual impairment tests, HP determined that no impairment of goodwill existed as of August 1, 2015.“Segment Information.” There were no goodwill impairments in fiscal 2014years 2017 and 2013.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10: Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)

        However, future goodwill impairment tests could result in a charge to net earnings.2016. HP will continue to evaluate goodwill on an annual basis as of the beginning of its fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment.

    Intangible Assets

        HP's intangible assets are composed of:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 As of October 31, 2014 
 
 Gross Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated
Impairment
Loss
 Net Gross Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated
Impairment
Loss
 Net 
 
 In millions
 

Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements

 $5,311 $(3,674)$(856)$781 $5,289 $(3,228)$(856)$1,205 

Developed and core technology and patents

  4,312  (1,165) (2,138) 1,009  4,266  (1,301) (2,138) 827 

Trade name and trade marks

  1,458  (57) (1,336) 65  1,693  (261) (1,336) 96 

In-process research and development

  159      159         

Total intangible assets

 $11,240 $(4,896)$(4,330)$2,014 $11,248 $(4,790)$(4,330)$2,128 

        In fiscal 2015, the decrease in gross intangible assets was due primarily to $936 million of intangible assets that became fully amortized, partially offset by intangible assets and IPR&D resulting from HP's acquisitions, primarily the acquisition of Aruba. Fully amortized intangible assets have been eliminated from gross intangible assets and accumulated amortization during the period.

        In fiscal 2014, $855 million of intangible assets became fully amortized and have been eliminated from gross intangible assets and accumulated amortization. HP also eliminated gross intangible assets and accumulated amortization related to the sale of a portfolio of intellectual property ("IP") in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

        The weighted-average useful lives of intangible assets as of October 31, 2015 are as follows:

Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Weighted-Average
Useful Lives

In years

Customer contracts, customer lists and distribution agreements

8

Developed and core technology and patents

7

Trade name and trade marks

7

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10: Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)

        As of October 31, 2015, estimated future amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets was as follows:

Fiscal year
 In millions 

2016

 $773 

2017

  353 

2018

  253 

2019

  213 

2020

  181 

Thereafter

  82 

Total

 $1,855 

Note 11:9: Fair Value


 Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Fair Value Hierarchy

HP uses valuation techniques that are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are developed using market data such as publicly available information and reflect the assumptions market participants would use, while unobservable inputs are developed using the best information available about the assumptions market participants would use. Assets and liabilities are classified in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to observable inputs and lowest priority to unobservable inputs.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 11:9: Fair Value (Continued)



The following table presents HP'sHP’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 As of October 31, 2014 
 
 Fair Value
Measured Using
  
 Fair Value
Measured Using
  
 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 In millions
 

Assets

                         

Cash Equivalents and Investments:

                         

Time deposits

 $ $3,584 $ $3,584 $ $2,865 $ $2,865 

Money market funds

  8,895      8,895  9,857      9,857 

Mutual funds

    246    246    244    244 

Marketable equity securities

  52  10    62  14  5    19 

Foreign bonds

  8  347    355  9  367    376 

Other debt securities

    2  40  42    1  46  47 

Derivative Instruments:

                         

Interest rate contracts

    38    38    105    105 

Foreign exchange contracts

    1,029  2  1,031    862  6  868 

Other derivatives

    8    8    7    7 

Total assets

 $8,955 $5,264 $42 $14,261 $9,880 $4,456 $52 $14,388 

Liabilities

                         

Derivative Instruments:

                         

Interest rate contracts

 $ $55 $ $55 $ $55 $ $55 

Foreign exchange contracts

    439  2  441    348  2  350 

Total liabilities

 $ $494 $2 $496 $ $403 $2 $405 
 As of October 31, 2017 As of October 31, 2016
 
Fair Value
Measured Using
   
Fair Value
Measured Using
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
 In millions
Assets: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Cash Equivalents: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Corporate debt$
 $1,390
 $
 $1,390
 $
 $2,092
 $
 $2,092
Financial institution instruments
 6
 
 6
 
 
 
 
Government debt(1)
3,902
 100
 
 4,002
 2,568
 
 
 2,568
Available-for-Sale Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt
 629
 
 629
 
 
 
 
Financial institution instruments
 78
 
 78
 
 2
 
 2
Government debt(1)

 442
 
 442
 
 
 
 
Mutual funds49
 
 
 49
 44
 
 
 44
Marketable equity securities6
 6
 
 12
 5
 4
 
 9
Derivative Instruments:

 

 

  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 48
 
 48
Foreign currency contracts
 110
 10
 120
 
 266
 11
 277
Other derivatives
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Total Assets$3,957
 $2,762
 $10
 $6,729
 $2,617
 $2,412
 $11
 $5,040
Liabilities: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Derivative Instruments: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts$
 $12
 $
 $12
 $
 $
 $
 $
Foreign currency contracts
 358
 2
 360
 
 94
 1
 95
Other derivatives
 
 
 
 
 2
 
 2
Total Liabilities$
 $370
 $2
 $372
 $
 $96
 $1
 $97

(1) Government debt includes instruments such as U.S. treasury notes, U.S agency securities and non-U.S. government bonds. Government debt Money market funds in active markets are included in Level 1.

There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during fiscal 2015years 2017 and 2014.

    2016.

Valuation Techniques

Cash Equivalents and Investments:  HP holds time deposits, money market funds, mutual funds, other debt securities primarily consisting of corporate and foreign government notes and bonds, and common stock and equivalents. HP values cash equivalents and equity investments using quoted market prices, alternative pricing sources, including NAV, or models utilizing market observable inputs. The fair value of debt investments was based on quoted market prices or model-driven valuations using inputs primarily derived from or corroborated by observable market data, and, in certain instances, valuation models that utilize assumptions which cannot be corroborated with observable market data.

Derivative Instruments:  HP uses forward contracts, interest rate and total return swaps and at times, option contracts to hedge certain foreign currency and interest rate exposures. HP uses industry standard valuation models to measure fair value. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rate curves, HP and counterparty credit risk, foreign currencyexchange rates, and forward and spot prices for currencies and interest rates. See Note 1210, “Financial Instruments” for a further discussion of HP'sHP’s use of derivative instruments.


Table of Contents


Other Fair Value Disclosures
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 11:9: Fair Value (Continued)

    Other Fair Value Disclosures



Short- and Long-Term Debt:  HP estimates the fair value of its debt primarily using an expected present value technique, which is based on observable market inputs using interest rates currently available to companies of similar credit standing for similar terms and remaining maturities, and considering its own credit risk. The portion of HP'sHP’s debt that is hedged is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as an amount equal to the debt'sdebt’s carrying amount and a fair value adjustment representing changes in the fair value of the hedged debt obligations arising from movements in benchmark interest rates. The estimated fair value of HP's short- and long-term debt approximated its carrying amount of $24.7 billion at October 31, 2015. The estimated fair value of HP'sHP’s short- and long-term debt was $19.9$8.1 billion at October 31, 2014,2017 compared to its carrying amount of $19.5$7.8 billion at that date. The estimated fair value of HP’s short- and long-term debt was $7.1 billion as compared to its carrying value of $6.8 billion at October 31, 2016. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, short- and long-term debt would be classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other Financial Instruments:  For the balance of HP'sHP’s financial instruments, primarily accounts receivable, accounts payable and financial liabilities included in other accrued liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, these other financial instruments would be classified in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Non-Marketable Equity Investments and Non-Financial Assets: Elements within HP'sHP’s non-marketable equity investments and non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, goodwill and property, plant and equipment, are recorded at fair value in the period an impairment charge is recognized. If measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, these would generally be classified inwithin Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In fiscal 2015, HP determined that it would exit certain data centers. HP conducted an analysis of the respective asset group to determine if the carrying value is greater than the fair value. As a result of this assessment, HP recorded a $136 million impairment charge to Impairment of data center assets on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)




Note 12:10: Financial Instruments

Cash Equivalents and Available-for-Sale Investments

        Cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments were as follows:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 As of October 31, 2014 
 
 Cost Gross
Unrealized
Gain
 Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair
Value
 Cost Gross
Unrealized
Gain
 Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair
Value
 
 
 In millions
 

Cash Equivalents:

                         

Time deposits

 $3,478 $ $ $3,478 $2,720 $ $ $2,720 

Money market funds

  8,895      8,895  9,857      9,857 

Mutual funds

  173      173  110      110 

Total cash equivalents

  12,546      12,546  12,687      12,687 

Available-for-Sale Investments:

                         

Debt securities:

                         

Time deposits

  106      106  145      145 

Foreign bonds

  276  79    355  286  90    376 

Other debt securities

  55    (13) 42  61    (14) 47 

Total debt securities

  437  79  (13) 503  492  90  (14) 568 

Equity securities:

                         

Mutual funds

  73      73  134      134 

Equity securities in public companies

  58  9  (9) 58  8  7    15 

Total equity securities

  131  9  (9) 131  142  7    149 

Total available-for-sale investments

  568  88  (22) 634  634  97  (14) 717 

Total cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments

 $13,114 $88 $(22)$13,180 $13,321 $97 $(14)$13,404 
 As of October 31, 2017 As of October 31, 2016
 Cost 
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
 
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 Cost 
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
 
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 In millions
Cash Equivalents: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Corporate debt$1,390
 $
 $
 $1,390
 $2,092
 $
 $
 $2,092
Financial institution instruments6
 
 
 6
 
 
 
 
Government debt4,002
 
 
 4,002
 2,568
 
 
 2,568
Total cash equivalents5,398
 
 
 5,398
 4,660
 
 
 4,660
Available-for-Sale Investments: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Corporate debt(1)
629
 
 
 629
 
 
 
 
Financial institution instruments(1)
78
 
 
 78
 2
 
 
 2
Government debt(1)
443
 
 (1) 442
 
 
 
 
Marketable equity securities
5
 7
 
 12
 6
 3
 
 9
Mutual funds39
 10
 
 49
 35
 9
 
 44
Total available-for-sale investments1,194
 17
 (1) 1,210
 43
 12
 
 55
Total cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments$6,592
 $17
 $(1) $6,608
 $4,703
 $12
 $
 $4,715


(1)
HP classifies its marketable debt securities as available-for-sale investments within Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, including those with maturity dates beyond one year, based on their highly liquid nature and availability for use in current operations.
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered cash equivalents. As of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the carrying amount of cash equivalents approximated fair value due to the short period of time to maturity. Interest income related to cash, cash equivalents and debt securities was approximately $129$66 million in fiscal 2015, $136year 2017, $24 million in fiscal 2014year 2016, and $148$75 million in fiscal 2013. Time deposits were primarily issued by institutions outside the U.S. as of October 31, 2015 and 2014.year 2015. The estimated fair value of the available-for-sale investments may not be representative of values that will be realized in the future.

        The gross unrealized loss as of October 31, 2015 and 2014 was due primarily to decline in the fair value of a debt security of $13 million and $14 million, respectively, that has been in a continuous loss position for more than twelve months. HP does not intend to sell this debt security, and it is not likely that HP will be required to sell this debt security prior to the recovery of the amortized cost.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12: Financial Instruments (Continued)

Contractual maturities of investments in available-for-sale debt securities were as follows:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
 
 In millions
 

Due in one year

 $104 $104 

Due in one to five years

  14  14 

Due in more than five years

  319  385 

 $437 $503 
 As of October 31, 2017
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
 In millions
Due in one year or less$538
 $538
Due in one to five years612
 611
 $1,150
 $1,149

Equity securities in privately held companies include cost basis and equity method investments and are included in Long-term financing receivables and otherOther non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounted to $58$37 million and $97$16 million atas of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

Derivative Instruments

HP is a global company exposedINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)


HP uses derivatives to offset business exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and interest rate changes in the normal course of its business.risk on expected future cash flows and on certain existing assets and liabilities. As part of its risk management strategy, HP uses derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts, interest rate swaps, total return swaps and, at times, option contracts to hedge certain foreign currency, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, equity exposures. HP's objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings or protecting the fair value of assets and liabilities. HP does not have any leveraged derivatives and does not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. HP may designate its derivative contracts as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges or hedgeshedges. HP classifies cash flows from its designated derivative contracts with the activities that correspond to the underlying hedged items on the Consolidated Statements of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation ("net investment hedges"). Additionally, forCash Flows. For derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, HP categorizes those economic hedges as other derivatives. HP recognizes all derivative instruments at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. HP classifies cash flows from its derivative programs with the activities that correspond to the underlying hedged items in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

As a result of its use of derivative instruments, HP is exposed to the risk that its counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate counterparty credit risk, HP has a policy of only entering into derivative contracts with carefully selected major financial institutions based on their credit ratings and other factors, and HP maintains dollar risk limits that correspond to each financial institution's credit rating and other factors. HP's established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk include reviewing and establishing limits for credit exposure and periodically reassessing the creditworthiness of its counterparties. Master netting agreements further mitigate credit exposure to counterparties by permitting HP to net amounts due from HP to counterparty against amounts due to HP from the same counterparty under certain conditions.

To further mitigatelimit credit exposure to counterparties,risk, HP has collateral security agreements that allow HP to hold collateral from, or require HP to post collateral to, counterparties when aggregate derivative fair values exceed contractually established thresholds which are generally based on the credit ratings of HP and its counterparties. If HP'sHP’s or the counterparty'scounterparty’s credit rating falls below a specified credit rating, either party has the right to request full collateralization of the derivatives'derivatives’ net liability


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12: Financial Instruments (Continued)

position. Collateral is generally posted within two business days. The fair value of derivatives with credit contingent features in a net liability position was $173$258 million and $38$2 million atas of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively, all of which were fully collateralized within two business days.

Under HP'sHP’s derivative contracts, the counterparty can terminate all outstanding trades following a covered change of control event affecting HP that results in the surviving entity being rated below a specified credit rating. This credit contingent provision did not affect HP'sHP’s financial position or cash flows as of October 31, 20152017 and 2014.

    2016.

Fair Value Hedges

HP issues long-term debt primarily in U.S. dollars based on market conditions at the time of financing. HP may enterenters into fair value hedges, such as interest rate swaps, to reduce the exposure of its debt portfolio to changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates by achieving a primarily U.S. dollar London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"(“LIBOR”)-based floating interest expense. The swap transactions generally involve principal and interest obligations for U.S. dollar-denominated amounts. Alternatively, HP may choose not to swap fixed for floating interest payments or may terminate a previously executed swap if it believes a larger proportion of fixed-rate debt would be beneficial.

        When investing in fixed-rate instruments, HP may enter into interest rate swaps that convert the fixed interest payments into variable interest payments and may designate these swaps as fair value hedges.

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, HP recognizes the change in fair value of the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item, in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of change.

Cash Flow Hedges

HP uses forward contracts and at times, option contracts designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in its forecasted net revenue and, to a lesser extent, cost of sales,revenue, operating expenses, and intercompany loans denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. HP'sHP’s foreign currency cash flow hedges mature generally within twelve months; however, hedges related to longer termlonger-term procurement arrangements extend several years and forward contracts associated with sales-type and direct-financing leases and intercompany loans extend for the duration of the lease or loan term, which typically range from two to five years.

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, HP initially records changes in fair value for the effective portion of the derivative instrument in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders' equitystockholders’ deficit in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and subsequently reclassifies these amounts into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. HP reports the effective portion of its cash flow hedges in the same financial statement line item as changes in the fair value of the hedged item.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12: Financial Instruments (Continued)

HP usesused forward contracts designated as net investment hedges to hedge net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency iswas the local currency. As part of the Separation, HP recordsdisposed of all these foreign subsidiaries and no longer utilizes net investment hedges. HP recorded the effective portion of such derivative instruments together with changes in the fair value of the hedged items in Cumulative translation adjustment as a separate component of stockholders' equity in thestockholders’ deficit.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheets.

    Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10: Financial Instruments (Continued)


Other Derivatives

Other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consist primarily of forward contracts used to hedge foreign currency-denominated balance sheet exposures. HP also uses total return swaps and, to a lesser extent, interest rate swaps, based on equity or fixed income indices, to hedge its executive deferred compensation plan liability.

For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, HP recognizes changes in fair value of the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item, in Interest and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period of change.

Hedge Effectiveness

For interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges, HP measures hedge effectiveness by offsetting the change in fair value of the hedged item with the change in fair value of the derivative. For foreign currency options and forward contracts designated as cash flow or net investment hedges, HP measures hedge effectiveness by comparing the cumulative change in fair value of the hedge contract with the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged item, both of which are based on forward rates. HP recognizes any ineffective portion of the hedge in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the same period in which ineffectiveness occurs. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in the period they arise.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12: Financial Instruments (Continued)

The gross notional and fair value of derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets was as follows:


 As of October 31, 2015 As of October 31, 2014 As of October 31, 2017 As of October 31, 2016

 Outstanding
Gross
Notional
 Other
Current
Assets
 Long-Term
Financing
Receivables
and Other
Assets
 Other
Accrued
Liabilities
 Long-Term
Other
Liabilities
 Outstanding
Gross
Notional
 Other
Current
Assets
 Long-Term
Financing
Receivables
and Other
Assets
 Other
Accrued
Liabilities
 Long-Term
Other
Liabilities
 
Outstanding
Gross
Notional
 
Other
Current
Assets
 
Other
Non-Current
Assets
 
Other
Accrued
Liabilities
 
Other
Non-Current
Liabilities
 
Outstanding
Gross
Notional
 
Other
Current
Assets
 
Other
Non-Current
Assets
 
Other
Accrued
Liabilities
 
Other
Non-Current
Liabilities

 In millions
 In millions

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

                      
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Fair value hedges:

                      
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Interest rate contracts

 $12,675 $1 $37 $ $55 $10,800 $3 $102 $ $55 $2,500
 $
 $
 $
 $12
 $2,000
 $
 $48
 $
 $

Cash flow hedges:

                      
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Foreign currency contracts

 19,551 467 216 193 87 20,196 539 124 131 94 16,149
 92
 12
 245
 100
 11,852
 203
 63
 52
 12

Net investment hedges:

                     

Foreign currency contracts

 1,860 114 66 7 4 1,952 44 47 10 8 

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

 34,086 582 319 200 146 32,948 586 273 141 157 18,649
 92
 12
 245
 112
 13,852
 203
 111
 52
 12

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

                      
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Foreign currency contracts

 18,238 79 89 87 63 21,384 82 32 82 25 5,801
 16
 
 15
 
 3,934
 11
 
 31
 

Other derivatives

 300 8    361 6 1   123
 1
 
 
 
 150
 
 
 2
 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

 18,538 87 89 87 63 21,745 88 33 82 25 5,924
 17
 
 15
 
 4,084
 11
 
 33
 

Total derivatives

 $52,624 $669 $408 $287 $209 $54,693 $674 $306 $223 $182 $24,573
 $109
 $12
 $260
 $112
 $17,936
 $214
 $111
 $85
 $12

HP recognizes all derivative instruments on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. HP does not offset the fair value of its derivative instruments against the fair value of cash collateral posted under its collateral security agreements. As of October 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, information related to the potential effect of HP'sHP’s master netting agreements and collateral security agreements was as follows:

 
 As of October 31, 2015 
 
 In the Consolidated Balance Sheets  
 
 
 (vi) = (iii)–(iv)–(v)
 
 
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii) = (i)–(ii)
 (iv)
 (v)
 
 
  
  
  
 Gross Amounts
Not Offset
  
 
 
 Gross
Amount
Recognized
 Gross
Amount
Offset
 Net Amount
Presented
 Derivatives Financial
Collateral
 Net Amount 
 
 In millions
 

Derivative assets

 $1,077 $ $1,077 $315 $640(1)$122 

Derivative liabilities

 $496 $ $496 $315 $19(2)$162 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12:10: Financial Instruments (Continued)


 
 As of October 31, 2014 
 
 In the Consolidated Balance Sheets  
 
 
 (vi) = (iii)–(iv)–(v)
 
 
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii) = (i)–(ii)
 (iv)
 (v)
 
 
  
  
  
 Gross Amounts
Not Offset
  
 
 
 Gross
Amount
Recognized
 Gross
Amount
Offset
 Net Amount
Presented
 Derivatives Financial
Collateral
 Net Amount 
 
 In millions
 

Derivative assets

 $980 $ $980 $361 $452(1)$167 

Derivative liabilities

 $405 $ $405 $361 $29(2)$15 

(1)
Represents the cash collateral posted by counterparties as of the respective reporting date for HP's asset position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date.

(2)
Represents the collateral posted by HP through re-use of counterparty cash collateral as of the respective reporting date for HP's liability position, net of derivative amounts that could be offset, as of, generally, two business days prior to the respective reporting date.

The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items in a fair value hedging relationship for fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 was as follows:


 (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative Instruments and Related Hedged Items  (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative Instruments and Related Hedged Items
Derivative Instrument
 Location 2015 2014 2013 Hedged Item Location 2015 2014 2013  Location 2017 2016 2015 Hedged Item Location 2017 2016 2015

  
 In millions
  
  
 In millions
    In millions     In millions

Interest rate contracts

 Interest and other, net $(67)$1 $(270)Fixed-rate debt Interest and other, net $67 $(1)$270  Interest and other, net $(60) $10
 $(12) Fixed-rate debt Interest and other, net $60
 $(10) $12


The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments in cash flow and net investment hedging relationships for fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 was as follows:

 
 Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI
on Derivatives
(Effective Portion)
 Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI
Into Earnings (Effective Portion)
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 Location 2015 2014 2013 
 
  
 In millions
  
 In millions
 

Cash flow hedges:

                     

Foreign currency contracts

 $1,067 $593 $(53)Net revenue $1,271 $(21)$48 

Foreign currency contracts

  (176) (203) (192)Cost of products  (150) (71) (165)

Foreign currency contracts

  (3) 7  (19)Other operating expenses  (7) (9) 1 

Foreign currency contracts

  203  (60) 21 Interest and other, net  198  (50) 10 

Total currency hedges

 $1,091 $337 $(243)  $1,312 $(151)$(106)

Net investment hedges:

                     

Foreign currency contracts

 $228 $57 $38 Interest and other, net $ $ $ 

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12:10: Financial Instruments (Continued)



(Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI
on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
(Loss) Gain Reclassified from Accumulated OCI
Into Earnings (Effective Portion)
 2017
2016
2015


2017
2016
2015
 In millions
 
In millions
Cash flow hedges: 

 

 

 
 

 

 
Foreign currency contracts$(651)
$199

$610

Net revenue
$(156)
$20

$995
  

 

 

Cost of revenue
(35)
(84)
(156)
  

 

 

Other operating expenses
1

1

(3)
  

 

 

Interest and other, net
(9)


(4)
Continuing Operations(651)
199

610

Loss (earnings) from continuing operations
(199)
(63)
832
Discontinued Operations



481

Earnings from discontinued operations




480
Total$(651)
$199

$1,091

Total
$(199)
$(63)
$1,312
Net investment hedges: 

 

 

 
 

 

 
Foreign currency contracts 

 

 



 

 

 
Continuing Operations$

$

$











Discontinued Operations



228











Total$

$

$228











As of October 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, no portion of the hedging instruments'instruments’ gain or loss was excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for fair value, cash flow or net investment hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness for fair value, cash flow and net investment hedges was not material for fiscal 2015, 2014years 2017, 2016 and 2013.

2015.

As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP expects to reclassify an estimated net Accumulated other comprehensive gainincome of approximately $26$159 million, net of taxes, to earnings in the next twelve months along with the earnings effects of the related forecasted transactions associated with cash flow hedges.

The pre-tax effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2015, 2014years 2017, 2016 and 20132015 was as follows:

 
 Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives 
 
 Location 2015 2014 2013 
 
  
 In millions
 

Foreign currency contracts

 Interest and other, net $304 $106 $156 

Other derivatives

 Interest and other, net      11 

Interest rate contracts

 Interest and other, net      3 

Total

   $304 $106 $170 

Note 13: Borrowings

        Notes payable and short-term borrowings, including the current portion of long-term debt, were as follows:

 
 2015 2014 
 
 As of October 31 
 
 Amount
Outstanding(1)
 Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
 Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
 
 
 In millions
  
 In millions
  
 

Current portion of long-term debt

 $2,321  3.2%$2,655  2.2%

Commercial paper(2)

  39  0.3% 298  0.5%

Notes payable to banks, lines of credit and other(2)

  525  3.1% 533  4.0%

 $2,885    $3,486    

(1)
Out of current portion of long-term debt, $2.1 billion U.S. Dollar Global Notes was redeemed and repaid on November 4, 2015.

(2)
Commercial paper balance of $39 million and $298 million and Notes payable to banks, lines of credit and other includes $374 million and $404 million at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of borrowing- and funding-related activity associated with HPFS and its subsidiaries.
 (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivatives
 Location 2017 2016 2015
   In millions
Foreign currency contractsInterest and other, net $(32) $(34) $293
Other derivativesInterest and other, net 3
 (6) (1)
Total  $(29) $(40) $292

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)




Note 13:11: Borrowings (Continued)

    Long-Term Debt

Notes Payable and Short-Term Borrowings
 
 As of 
 
 October 31,
2015
 October 31,
2014
 
 
 In millions
 

U.S. Dollar Global Notes(1)

       

2006 Shelf Registration Statement:

       

$500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.694% in February 2007 at 5.4%, due March 2017, paid November 2015

 $162 $500 

$750 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.932% in March 2008 at 5.5%, due March 2018, paid November 2015

  283  750 

2009 Shelf Registration Statement:

       

$1,100 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.887% in September 2010 at 2.125%, paid September 2015

    1,100 

$650 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.911% in December 2010 at 2.2%, due December 2015, paid November 2015

  309  650 

$1,350 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.827% in December 2010 at 3.75%, due December 2020            

  648  1,349 

$1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.958% in May 2011 at 2.65%, due June 2016, paid November 2015

  346  1,000 

$1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.799% in May 2011 at 4.3%, due June 2021

  1,248  1,248 

$750 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.977% in September 2011 at 2.35%, paid March 2015

    750 

$1,300 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.784% in September 2011 at 3.0%, due September 2016, paid November 2015

  390  1,298 

$1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.816% in September 2011 at 4.375%, due September 2021

  999  999 

$1,200 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.863% in September 2011 at 6.0%, due September 2041

  1,199  1,199 

$650 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.946% in December 2011 at 2.625%, paid December 2014            

    650 

$850 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.790% in December 2011 at 3.3%, due December 2016, paid November 2015

  220  849 

$1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.707% in December 2011 at 4.65%, due December 2021            

  1,497  1,496 

$1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.985% in March 2012 at 2.6%, due September 2017, paid November 2015

  436  1,500 

$500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.771% in March 2012 at 4.05%, due September 2022

  499  499 

2012 Shelf Registration Statement:

       

$750 issued at par in January 2014 at three-month USD LIBOR plus 0.94%, due January 2019

  102  750 

$1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.954% in January 2014 at 2.75%, due January 2019

  300  1,250 

  8,638  17,837 

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Senior Notes

       

$2,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.944% in October 2015 at 2.4%, due October 2017

  2,249   

$2,650 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.872% in October 2015 at 2.8%, due October 2018

  2,647   

$3,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.972% in October 2015 at 3.6%, due October 2020

  2,999   

$1,350 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.802% in October 2015 at 4.4%, due October 2022

  1,347   

$2,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.725% in October 2015 at 4.9%, due October 2025

  2,493   

$750 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.942% in October 2015 at 6.2%, due October 2035            

  749   

$1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.932% in October 2015 at 6.3%, due October 2045

  1,499   

$350 issued at par in October 2015 at three-month USD LIBOR plus 1.74%, due October 2017

  350   

$250 issued at par in October 2015 at three-month USD LIBOR plus 1.93%, due October 2018

  250   

  14,583   
 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
 
Amount
Outstanding
 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
 In millions   In millions  
Commercial paper$943
 1.8% $
 %
Current portion of long-term debt96
 3.5% 51
 4.1%
Notes payable to banks, lines of credit and other33
 1.5% 27
 2.0%
 $1,072
  
 $78
  

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13: Borrowings (Continued)

 
 As of 
 
 October 31,
2015
 October 31,
2014
 
 
 In millions
 

EDS Senior Notes(1)

       

$300 issued October 1999 at 7.45%, due October 2029

  313  313 

Other, including capital lease obligations, at 0.00%-8.30%, due in calendar years 2015-2024(2)

  519  424 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged debt

  48  120 

Less: current portion

  (2,321) (2,655)

Total long-term debt

 $21,780 $16,039 

Long-Term Debt
(1)
HP may redeem some or all of the fixed-rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes and EDS Senior Notes at any time in accordance with the terms thereof. The U.S. Dollar Global Notes and EDS Senior Notes are senior unsecured debt.

 As of October 31
 2017 2016
 In millions
U.S. Dollar Global Notes(1)
 
  
2009 Shelf Registration Statement: 
  
$1,350 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.827% in December 2010 at 3.75%, due December 2020$648
 $648
$1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.799% in May 2011 at 4.3%, due June 20211,249
 1,248
$1,000 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.816% in September 2011 at 4.375%, due September 2021999
 999
$1,500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.707% in December 2011 at 4.65%, due December 20211,498
 1,498
$500 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.771% in March 2012 at 4.05%, due September 2022499
 499
$1,200 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.863% in September 2011 at 6.0%, due September 20411,199
 1,199
2012 Shelf Registration Statement: 
  
$750 issued at par in January 2014 at three-month USD LIBOR plus 0.94%, due January 2019102
 102
$1,250 issued at discount to par at a price of 99.954% in January 2014 at 2.75%, due January 2019300
 300
 6,494
 6,493
Other, including capital lease obligations, at 0.51%-8.49%, due in calendar years 2018-2025360
 244
Fair value adjustment related to hedged debt8
 72
Less: Unamortized debt issuance cost(2)
(19) (23)
Less: current portion of long-term debt(96) (51)
Total long-term debt$6,747
 $6,735
(1)
HP may redeem some or all of the fixed-rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes at any time in accordance with the terms thereof.    The U.S. Dollar Global Notes are senior unsecured debt.
(2)
Other, including capital lease obligations includes $196 million and $123 million Effective November 1, 2016, HP adopted ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which amended the presentation of debt issuance costs as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of borrowing- and funding-related activity associated with HPFS and its subsidiaries that are collateralized by receivables and underlying assets associated with the related capital and operating leases. For both the periods presented,a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liability.

In December 2016, HP filed a shelf registration statement with the assets approximatedSEC to enable the carryingcompany to offer for sale, from time to time, in one or more offerings, an unspecified amount of the borrowing.debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants.

As disclosed in Note 12,10, “Financial Instruments”, HP uses interest rate swaps to mitigate some of the exposure of its debt portfolio to changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates by achieving a primarily U.S. dollar LIBOR-based
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 11: Borrowings (Continued)


floating interest expense. Interest rates shown in the table of long-term debt have not been adjusted to reflect the impact of any interest rate swaps.


As of October 31, 2015,2017, aggregate future maturities of debt at face value (excluding aunamortized debt issuance cost of $19 million and discounts on debt issuance of $6 million less fair value adjustment related to hedged debt of $48 million, a premium on debt issuance of $13 million and a discount on debt issuance of $25$8 million), including capital lease obligations were as follows:

Fiscal year
 Aggregate future
maturities of debt
outstanding including
capital lease
obligations
 In millions

 In millions
 

2016

 $2,885 

2017

 2,653 

2018

 3,029 $1,072

2019

 411 505

2020

 3,003 77
20212,949
20222,014

Thereafter

 12,648 1,219

Total

 $24,629 $7,836

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13: Borrowings (Continued)

        Interest expense on borrowings recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings during the fiscal years was as follows:

Expense
 Location 2015 2014 2013 
 
  
 In millions
 

Financing interest

 Financing interest $240 $277 $312 

Interest expense

 Interest and other, net  327  344  426 

Total interest expense

   $567 $621 $738 
���
Commercial Paper

On October 9, 2015, Hewlett Packard Enterprise completed the offering and pricing of nine series of senior unsecured notes (the "Notes") in an aggregate principal amount of $14.6 billion which includes $14.0 billion of fixed rate notes and $600 million of floating rate notes. The interest on fixed rate notes are payable semiannually and the interest on floating-rate notes are payable quarterly. The issuance costs of $54 million are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized to Interest expense over the term of the Notes. The Notes were initially guaranteed by HP. The guarantee was automatically and unconditionally released upon the completion of the Separation on November 1, 2015.

        Concurrent with2015, HP’s Board of Directors authorized HP to borrow up to a total outstanding principal balance of $4.0 billion or the equivalent in foreign currencies for the use and benefit of HP and HP’s subsidiaries, by the issuance of the Notes, Hewlett Packard Enterprise entered into interest rate swaps to reduce the exposure of $9.5 billion of aggregate principal amount of fixed rate senior notes to changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates by achieving LIBOR-based floating interest expense.

    Extinguishment of Debt

        On September 30, 2015, HP commenced cash tender offers ("the Tender Offers") to purchase up to $8.85 billion outstanding debt securities in two separate offers, for (i) any and all of its outstanding 2.20% notes due December 2015, 2.65% notes due June 2016, 3.00% notes due September 2016, 3.30% notes due December 2016, 5.40% notes due March 2017, 2.60% notes due September 2017 and 5.50% notes due March 2018 and (ii) up to $2.3 billion in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 2.75% notes due January 2019, Floating Rate notes due January 2019, 3.75% notes due December 2020, 4.30% notes due June 2021, 4.375% notes due September 2021, 4.650% notes due December 2021, 4.050% notes due September 2022 and 6.00% notes due September 2041. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, HP redeemed and repaid $6.6 billion and this early extinguishment of debt resulted in a loss of $167 million, net of realized gains from fair value hedges, which was recorded as "Interest and other, net" on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. On November 4, 2015, HP incrementally redeemed and repaid a total of $2.1 billion fixed-rate U.S. Dollar Global Notes which resulted in a loss of $66 million, net of realized gains from fair value hedges.

    Commercial Paper

        HP's Board of Directors has authorized the issuance of up to $16.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of commercial paper by HP. HP's subsidiaries are authorized to issue up to an additional $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amountor through the execution of commercial paper.promissory notes, loan agreements, letters of credit, agreements for lines of credit or overdraft facilities. As of October 31, 2017, HP maintainsmaintained two commercial paper


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13: Borrowings (Continued)

programs, and a wholly-owned subsidiary maintains a third program. HP's programs. HP’s U.S. program provides for the issuance of U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $16.0$4.0 billion. HP'sHP’s euro commercial paper program provides for the issuance of commercial paper outside of the U.S.United States denominated in U.S. dollars, euros or British pounds up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $3.0$4.0 billion or the equivalent in those alternative currencies. The combined aggregate principal amount of commercial paper outstanding under those programs at any one time cannot exceed the $16.0$4.0 billion authorized by HP'sHP’s Board of Directors. The

Credit Facility
As of October 31, 2017, HP subsidiary's euro Commercial Paper/Certificate of Deposit Programme provides for the issuance of commercial paper in various currencies of upmaintained a $4.0 billion senior unsecured committed revolving credit facility to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $500 million.

        On November 1, 2015, HP's Board of Directors authorized to borrow for the use and benefit of HP and HP's subsidiaries, bysupport the issuance of commercial paper or throughfor general corporate purposes. Commitments under the execution of promissory notes, loan agreements, letters of credit, agreements for lines of credit or overdraft facilities. The total outstanding principal balance of such commercial paper issued by shall not exceed $4.0 billion or the equivalent in foreign currencies.

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise Commercial Paper and Credit Agreements

        Hewlett Packard Enterprise's Board of Directors has authorized the issuance of up to $4.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of commercial paper. Hewlett Packard Enterprise maintains two commercial paper programs: (i) a U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper program under which, Hewlett Packard Enterprise is permitted to have issued and outstanding up to $4.0 billion unsecured commercial paper notes (the "U.S. Commercial Paper Program"), and (ii) a euro-commercial paper program under which, Hewlett Packard Enterprise is permitted to have issued and outstanding up to $3 billion unsecured commercial paper notes issued outside the U.S., (the "euro Commercial Paper Program"). The combined aggregate principal amount of commercial paper outstanding under those programs at any one time cannot exceed $4.0 billion. The Hewlett Packard Enterprise's subsidiaries has been authorized to issue up to an additional $500 million in aggregate principal amount of commercial paper. The Hewlett Packard Enterprise subsidiary's euro Commercial Paper / Certificate of Deposit Program, which provides for the issuance of commercial paper in various currencies of up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $500 million.

    Credit Agreements

        As of October 31, 2015, HP maintained senior unsecured committed credit facilities primarily to support the issuance of commercial paper. HP had a $3.0 billion five-yearrevolving credit facility that would have expired in March 2017 and a $4.5 billion five-year credit facility that would have expired inwill be available until April 2, 2019. Both facilities supported the U.S. commercial paper program and the euro commercial paper program. Commitment fees, interest rates and other terms of borrowing under the credit facilities variedvary based on HP'sHP’s external credit ratings. HP's ability to have an outstanding U.S. commercial paper balance that exceeded the $7.5 billion supported by these credit facilitiesAs of October 31, 2017, HP was subject to a number of factors, including liquidity conditions and business performance. In addition, the $3.0 billion five-year credit facility had been amended in September 2012 to permit borrowings in euros and British pounds,compliance with the amountsfinancial covenants in the credit agreement governing the revolving credit facility.

Available Borrowing Resources
As of October 31, 2017, HP’s and HP’s subsidiaries had available borrowing resources of $846 million from uncommitted lines of credit in euros and British pounds being limitedaddition to the U.S. dollar equivalent of $2.2 billion and $300 million, respectively.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13: Borrowings (Continued)

        On November 1, 2015, the $3.0 billion five-year credit facility was cancelled and HP amended the $4.5 billion five-year credit facility to asenior unsecured committed revolving credit facility providing for a senior, unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $4.0 billion. Commitments under the revolving credit facility will be available until the period ending on April 2, 2019. Funds to be borrowed under this revolving credit facility may be used for general corporate purposes.

    Term Loan Agreement

        On April 30, 2015, HP entered into a credit agreement that provides for a senior unsecured delayed, multiple draw term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $5.0 billion. Funds borrowed under this agreement were used for general corporate purposes, including to pay expenses associated with HP's proposed plan to separate into two independent publicly traded companies and matters related to the acquisition of Aruba. In fiscal 2015, HP borrowed and repaid $3.5 billion under this credit agreement. Along with the repayment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, this term loan agreement has terminated upon the Separation.

    Available Borrowing Resources

        HP's and HP's subsidiaries' resources available to obtain short-or long-term financing were as follows:

 
 As of
October 31,
2015
 
 
 In millions
 

Commercial paper programs(1)

 $16,461 

Uncommitted lines of credit

 $2,524 

discussed above.
(1)
The extent to which HP is able to utilize the commercial paper programs as sources of liquidity at any given time is subject to a number of factors, including market demand for HP securities and commercial paper, HP's financial performance, HP's credit ratings and market conditions generally.

Note 14: Stockholders' Equity12: Stockholders’ Deficit

Dividends

The stockholders of HP common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by HP'sHP’s Board of Directors. Dividends declared were $0.53 per share of common stock in fiscal year 2017, $0.50 per share of common stock in fiscal year 2016 and $0.67 per share of common sharestock in fiscal 2015, $0.61 per common share in fiscal 2014 and $0.55 per common share in fiscal 2013.

    year 2015.

Share Repurchase Program

        HP's

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)


HP’s share repurchase program authorizes both open market and private repurchase transactions. In fiscal year 2017, HP executed share repurchases of 80 million shares, which include 1.5 million shares settled in November 2017. In fiscal year 2017, HP settled total shares for $1.4 billion.

In fiscal year 2016, HP executed share repurchases of 100 million shares. In fiscal year 2016, HP settled total shares for $1.2 billion. In fiscal year 2015, HP executed share repurchases of 75 million shares which included 0.5 million shares settled in November, 2015. In fiscal 2015, HPand settled total shares for $2.9 billion. In fiscal 2014, HP executed share repurchases of 92 million shares and settled total shares for $2.7 billion. In fiscal 2013, HP executed share repurchases of 77 million shares and settled total shares for $1.5 billion.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14: Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

The shares repurchased in fiscal 2015, 2014years 2017, 2016 and 20132015 were all open market repurchase transactions. As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP had remaining authorization of $2.0approximately $2.5 billion for future share repurchases under the $10.0$3.0 billion repurchase authorization approved by HP'sHP’s Board of Directors on July 21, 2011.


Taxes related to Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Income

 
 For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Tax benefit (provision) on change in unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities:

          

Tax benefit (provision) on unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period

 $2 $(1)$(14)

  2  (1) (14)

Tax benefit (provision) on change in unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges:

          

Tax (provision) benefit on unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

  (294) (174) 97 

Tax provision (benefit) on (gains) losses reclassified into earnings

  368  (18) (49)

  74  (192) 48 

Tax benefit (provision) on change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:

          

Tax benefit (provision) on (losses) gains arising during the period

  5  181  (258)

Tax benefit on amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit

  (18) (18) (35)

Tax benefit (provision) on curtailments, settlements and other

  24  (9) (5)

  11  154  (298)

Tax (provision) benefit on change in cumulative translation adjustment

  (73) (27) 25 

Tax benefit (provision) on other comprehensive (loss) income

 $14 $(66)$(239)
 
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Tax effect on change in unrealized components of available-for-sale securities: 
  
  
Tax (provision) benefit on unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period$(1) $(3) $2
 

 

 

Tax effect on change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges:   
  
Tax benefit (provision) on unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period42
 32
 (294)
Tax (benefit) provision benefit on losses (gains) reclassified into earnings(16) (1) 368
 26
 31
 74
Tax effect on change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:   
  
Tax (provision) benefit on gains (losses) arising during the period(140) 242
 5
Tax provision on amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit(21) (12) (18)
Tax benefit (provision) on curtailments, settlements and other72
 (213) 24
 (89) 17
 11
Tax provision on change in cumulative translation adjustment
 
 (73)
Tax (provision) benefit on other comprehensive income (loss)$(64) $45
 $14

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14: Stockholders' Equity12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)



Changes and reclassifications related to Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income,income, net of taxes

 
 For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions
 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes:

          

Change in unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities:

          

Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period

 $(15)$6 $38 

Gains reclassified into earnings

    (1) (49)

  (15) 5  (11)

Change in unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges:

          

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

  797  163  (146)

(Gains) losses reclassified into earnings(1)

  (944) 133  57 

  (147) 296  (89)

Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans:

          

(Losses) gains arising during the period

  (543) (2,575) 1,695 

Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit(2)

  425  241  291 

Curtailments, settlements and other

  139  42  20 

  21  (2,292) 2,006 

Change in cumulative translation adjustment

  (280) (112) (125)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes

 $(421)$(2,103)$1,781 

(1)
Reclassification of pre-tax (gains) losses on cash flow hedges into the Consolidated Statements of Earnings was as follows:

 
  
 2015 2014 2013 
 
  
 In millions
 
 

 

Net revenue

 $(1,271)$21 $(48)
 

 

Cost of products

  150  71  165 
 

 

Other operating expenses

  7  9  (1)
 

 

Interest and other, net

  (198) 50  (10)
 

   $(1,312)$151 $106 
 For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 2017
2016
2015
 In millions
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes: 

 

 
Change in unrealized components of available-for-sale securities: 

 

 
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period$3

$(2)
$(15)









Change in unrealized components of cash flow hedges: 

 

 
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period(609)
231

797
Losses (gains) reclassified into earnings(1)
183

62

(944)
 (426)
293

(147)
Change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans: 

 

 
Gains (Losses) arising during the period315

(517)
(543)
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service benefit(2)
53

39

425
Curtailments, settlements and other75

(30)
139
 443

(508)
21
Change in cumulative translation adjustment



(280)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes$20

$(217)
$(421)
(1)
Reclassification of pre-tax losses (gains) on cash flow hedges into the Consolidated Statements of Earnings was as follows:  
 
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Net revenue$156
 $(20) $(995)
Cost of revenue35
 84
 156
Other operating expenses(1) (1) 3
Interest and other, net9
 
 4
Loss (earnings) from continuing operations199
 63
 (832)
Earnings from discontinued operations
 
 (480)
Total$199
 $63
 $(1,312)
(2)
These components are included in the computation of net pension and post-retirement benefit (credit) costcharges in Note 4.
4,
“Retirement and Post-Retirement Benefit Plans”.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14: Stockholders' Equity12: Stockholders’ Deficit (Continued)



The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes as of October 31, 20152017 and changes during fiscal year 20152017 were as follows:

 
 Net unrealized
gain on
available-for-sale
securities
 Net unrealized
gain (loss) on cash
flow hedges
 Unrealized
components
of defined
benefit plans
 Cumulative
translation
adjustment
 Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 
 
 In millions
 

Balance at beginning of period

 $81 $108 $(5,376)$(694)$(5,881)

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications

  (15) 797  (404) (280) 98 

Reclassifications of (gains) losses into earnings

    (944) 425    (519)

Balance at end of period

 $66 $(39)$(5,355)$(974)$(6,302)
 Net unrealized
gain on
available-for-sale
securities

Net unrealized
gain (loss) on 
cash flow 
hedges

Unrealized
components
of defined
benefit plans

Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 In millions
Balance at beginning of period$9

$186

$(1,633)
$(1,438)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications3

(609)
390

(216)
Reclassifications of loss into earnings

183

53

236
Balance at end of period$12

$(240)
$(1,190)
$(1,418)


Note 15: Net13: Earnings Per Share

HP calculates basic net EPS using net earnings and the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net EPS includes any dilutive effect of restricted stock awards,units, stock options, performance-based awards and shares purchased under the 2011 ESPP.

        The reconciliationsemployee stock purchase plan.

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominatorsnumber of each of theshares used for basic and diluted net EPS calculations wereis as follows:

 
 For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 In millions, except per share
amounts

 

Numerator:

          

Net earnings(1)

 $4,554 $5,013 $5,113 

Denominator:

          

Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net EPS

  1,814  1,882  1,934 

Dilutive effect of employee stock plans

  22  30  16 

Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net EPS

  1,836  1,912  1,950 

Net earnings per share:

          

Basic

 $2.51 $2.66 $2.64 

Diluted

 $2.48 $2.62 $2.62 

Anti-dilutive weighted-average options(2)

  23  26  52 

(1)
HP considers restricted stock awards that provide the holder with a non-forfeitable right to receive dividends to be participating securities. As of October 31, 2015, there were no restricted stock

 
For the fiscal years ended
October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions, except per share amounts
Numerator: 
  
  
Net earnings from continuing operations$2,526
 $2,666
 $3,718
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations
 (170) 836
Net earnings$2,526
 $2,496
 $4,554
Denominator: 
  
  
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic net EPS1,688
 1,730
 1,814
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans14
 13
 22
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net EPS1,702
 1,743
 1,836
Basic net earnings per share: 
  
  
Continuing operations$1.50
 $1.54
 $2.05
Discontinued operations
 (0.10) 0.46
Basic net earnings per share$1.50
 $1.44
 $2.51
Diluted net earnings per share: 
  
  
Continuing operations$1.48
 $1.53
 $2.02
Discontinued operations
 (0.10) 0.46
Diluted net earnings per share$1.48
 $1.43
 $2.48
Anti-dilutive weighted-average options(1)
1
 13
 23

Table of Contents


(1)
HP excludes stock options and restricted stock units where the assumed proceeds exceed the average market price from the calculation of diluted net EPS, because their effect would be anti-dilutive. The assumed proceeds of a stock option include the sum of its exercise price, and average unrecognized compensation cost. The assumed proceeds of a restricted stock unit represent unrecognized compensation cost.

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)




Note 15: Net Earnings Per Share (Continued)

(2)
HP excludes options and restricted stock units where the assumed proceeds exceed the average market price from the calculation of diluted net EPS, because their effect would be anti-dilutive. The assumed proceeds of an option include the sum of its exercise price, average unrecognized compensation cost and excess tax benefits. The assumed proceeds of a restricted stock unit include the sum of its average unrecognized compensation cost and excess tax benefits.

Note 16:14: Litigation and Contingencies

HP is involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those identified below, consisting of IP, commercial, securities, employment, employee benefits and environmental matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. HP accrues a liability when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. HP believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any such matters and, as of October 31, 2015,2017, it was not reasonably possible that a material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in HP'sHP’s financial statements. HP reviews these matters at least quarterly and adjusts its accruals to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, HP shares responsibility with Hewlett Packard Enterprise for certain matters, as indicated below, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has agreed to indemnify HP in whole or in part with respect to certain matters. Based on its experience, HP believes that any damage amounts claimed in the specific matters discussed below are not a meaningful indicator of HP'sHP’s potential liability. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, HP believes it has valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against it. Nevertheless, cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies.

        Under the separation and distribution agreement, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise agreed to cooperate with each other in managing litigation and environmental matters related to both companies' businesses. The separation and distribution agreement also included provisions that assign to each company responsibility for managing pending and future litigation and environmental matters related to the general corporate matters of HP arising prior to the Separation.

Litigation, Proceedings and Investigations

Copyright Levies.  As described below, proceedingsProceedings are ongoing or have been concluded involving HP in certain European Union ("EU") member countries, including litigation in Germany, Belgium and Austria,other countries, seeking to impose or modify levies upon equipment (such as multi-functionmultifunction devices ("MFDs"(“MFDs”), PCs and printers) andPCs), alleging that these devices enable producingthe production of private copies of copyrighted materials. Descriptions of some of the ongoing proceedings are included below. The levies are generally based upon the number of products sold and the per-product amounts of the levies, which vary. Some EU memberEuropean countries that do not yet have levies on digital devices are expected to implement similar legislation to enable them to extend existing levy schemes, while some other EU memberEuropean countries have phased out levies or are expected to limit the scope of levy schemes and applicability in the digital hardware environment, particularly with respect to sales to business users. HP, other companies and various industry associations have opposed the extension of levies to the digital environment and have advocated alternative models of compensation to rights holders.

        VerwertungsGesellschaft Wort ("VG Wort"), a collection agency representing certain copyright holders, instituted legal proceedings against HP in the Stuttgart Civil Court seeking to impose levies on


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

printers. On December 22, 2004, the court held that HP is liable for payments regarding all printers using ASCII code sold in Germany but did not determine the amount payable per unit. HP appealed this decision in January 2005 to the Stuttgart Court of Appeals. On May 11, 2005, the Stuttgart Court of Appeals issued a decision confirming that levies are due. On June 6, 2005, HP filed an appeal to the German Federal Supreme Court in Karlsruhe. On December 6, 2007, the German Federal Supreme Court issued a judgment that printers are not subject to levies under existing law. VG Wort appealed the decision by filing a claim with the German Federal Constitutional Court challenging the ruling that printers are not subject to levies. On September 21, 2010, the Constitutional Court published a decision holding that the German Federal Supreme Court erred by not referring questions on interpretation of German copyright law to the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") and therefore revoked the German Federal Supreme Court decision and remitted the matter to it. On July 21, 2011, the German Federal Supreme Court stayed the proceedings and referred several questions to the CJEU with regard to the interpretation of the European Copyright Directive. On June 27, 2013, the CJEU issued its decision responding to those questions. The German Federal Supreme Court subsequently scheduled a joint hearing on this matter with other cases relating to reprographic levies on printers and PCs that was held on October 31, 2013. The German Federal Supreme Court issued a decision on July 3, 2014 partially granting the claim of VG Wort. The German Federal Supreme Court decision provides that levies are due where the printer is used with a PC to make permitted reprographic copies in a single process under the control of the same person, but no levies are due on a printer for reprographic copies made with a "scanner-PC-printer" product chain. The case has been remitted to the Stuttgart Civil Court to assess the amount to be paid per printer unit. The industry association BITKOM and VG Wort signed a settlement agreement defining the levies due on printers sold in Germany from 2001-2007. HP opted to join the settlement agreement on August 10, 2015 and paid €68.2 million (approximately $72.0 million) in levies, excluding value added taxes, due as a result of such settlement by November 30, 2015.

        In September 2003, VG Wort filed a lawsuit against Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH ("Fujitsu") in the Munich Civil Court in Munich, Germany seeking to impose levies on PCs. This is an industry test case in Germany, and HP has agreed not to object to the delay if VG Wort sues HP for such levies on PCs following a final decision against Fujitsu. On December 23, 2004, the Munich Civil Court held that PCs are subject to a levy and that Fujitsu must pay €12 plus compound interest for each PC sold in Germany since March 2001. Fujitsu appealed this decision in January 2005 to the Munich Court of Appeals. On December 15, 2005, the Munich Court of Appeals affirmed the Munich Civil Court decision. Fujitsu filed an appeal with the German Federal Supreme Court in February 2006. On October 2, 2008, the German Federal Supreme Court issued a judgment that PCs were not photocopiers within the meaning of the German copyright law that was in effect until December 31, 2007 and, therefore, were not subject to the levies on photocopiers established by that law. VG Wort subsequently filed a claim with the German Federal Constitutional Court challenging that ruling. In January 2011, the Constitutional Court published a decision holding that the German Federal Supreme Court decision was inconsistent with the German Constitution and revoking the German Federal Supreme Court decision. The Constitutional Court also remitted the matter to the German Federal Supreme Court for further action. On July 21, 2011, the German Federal Supreme Court stayed the proceedings and referred several questions to the CJEU with regard to the interpretation of the European Copyright Directive. On June 27, 2013, the CJEU issued its decision responding to those questions. The German Federal Supreme Court subsequently scheduled a joint hearing on that matter with other cases relating to reprographic levies on printers that was held on October 31, 2013. The


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

German Federal Supreme Court issued a decision on July 3, 2014 partially granting the claim of VG Wort. The German Federal Supreme Court decision provides that levies are due for audio-visual copying of standing text and pictures using a PC as the last device in a single reproduction process under the control of the same person, but no levies are due on a PC for reprographic copies made using a "PC-printer" or a "scanner-PC-printer" chain. The case has been remitted to the Munich Court of Appeals to assess the amount to be paid per PC unit.

Reprobel, a cooperative society with the authority to collect and distribute the remuneration for reprography to Belgian copyright holders, requested by extra-judicialextrajudicial means that HP amend certain copyright levy declarations submitted for inkjet MFDs sold in Belgium from January 2005 to December 2009 to enable it to collect copyright levies calculated based on the generally higher copying speed when the MFDs are operated in draft print mode rather than when operated in normal print mode. In March 2010, HP filed a lawsuit against Reprobel in the French-speaking chambers of the Court of First Instance of Brussels seeking a declaratory judgment that no copyright levies are payable on sales of MFDs in Belgium or, alternatively, that copyright levies payable on such MFDs must be assessed based on the copying speed when operated in the normal print mode set by default in the device. On November 16, 2012, the court issued a decision holding that Belgium law is not in conformity with EUEuropean Union (“EU”) law in a number of respects and ordered that, by November 2013, Reprobel substantiate that the amounts claimed by Reprobel are commensurate with the harm resulting from legitimate copying under the reprographic exception. HP subsequently appealed that court decision to the Courts of Appeal in Brussels seeking to confirm that the Belgian law is not in conformity with EU law and that, if Belgian law is interpreted in a manner consistent with EU law, no payments by HP are required or, alternatively, the payments already made by HP are sufficient to comply with its obligations under Belgian law. On October 23, 2013, the Court of Appeal in Brussels stayed the proceedings and referred several questions to the CJEUCourt of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) relating to whether the Belgian reprographic copyright levies system is in conformity with EU law. The case was heard by the CJEU on January 29, 2015 and on November 12, 2015, the CJEU published its judgment providing that a national legislation such as the Belgian one at issue in the main proceedings is incompatible with EU law inon multiple legal points, as argued by HP. The Court of Appeal issued an appealable decision on May 12, 2017 providing that Belgian reprographic copyright levies are due notwithstanding the lack of Brussels now hasconformity of the system with EU law in certain aspects. Applicable levies are to rulebe calculated based on the litigation between HP and Reprobel following the answers providedobjective speed of each MFD as established by an expert appointed by the CJEU.

Court of Appeal.

Based on industry opposition to the extension of levies to digital products, HP'sHP’s assessments of the merits of various proceedings and HP'sHP’s estimates of the number of units impacted and the amounts of the levies, HP has accrued amounts that it believes are adequate to address the matters described above. However, the ultimate resolution of these matters and the associated financial impact on HP, including the number of units impacted and the amount of levies imposed, remains uncertain.

Memjet Technology Ltd. v. HP.    On August 11, 2015, Memjet Technology Ltd. ("Memjet") filed a lawsuit against HP in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of California. The complaint alleges that HP infringes eight Memjet patents. The products accused of infringement are those that use the HP PageWide Technology, including the OfficeJet Pro X series, OfficeJet Enterprise X series, HP PageWide XL, wide scan printers, and printers using 4.25-inch thermal inkjet printheads, such as HP Web Presses and Photo Kiosks. On October 2, 2015, HP answered Memjet's complaint and asserted a counter-claim against Memjet for infringement of four HP patents. The products accused of infringement include various Memjet OEM printers that incorporate Memjet's printheads and print engines. On November 20, 2015, HP asserted three additional patents against Memjet. The patents

ongoing disputes.

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16:14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)


Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corporation

asserted by both parties generally relate to inkjet printhead and print system technology. Both Memjet's and HP's respective complaints seek injunctive relief and monetary damages from the other party for alleged patent infringement.. On November 16, 2015, Memjet was granted anex partepreliminary injunction in Germany (State Court Munich), against HP Deutschland GmbH's sale and offers for sale of HP PageWide XL printers. Memjet's injunction request alleges that HP infringes a Memjet European patent. On December 4, 2015,June 15, 2011, HP filed an opposition and an application to suspend enforcementsuit against Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) in California Superior Court in Santa Clara County in connection with Oracle’s March 2011 announcement that it was discontinuing software support for HP’s Itanium-based line of mission critical servers. HP asserted, among other things, that Oracle’s actions breached the contract that was signed by the parties as part of the preliminary injunction pending a court hearing and decision. On December 9, 2015,settlement of the court denied HP's applicationlitigation relating to suspend enforcement priorOracle’s hiring of Mark Hurd. The matter eventually progressed to a hearing. A hearing is scheduled for January 7, 2016.

Fair Labor Standards Act Litigation.trial, which was bifurcated into two phases. HP is involvedprevailed in several lawsuitsthe first phase of the trial, in which the plaintiffs are seeking unpaid overtime compensation and other damages basedcourt ruled that the contract at issue required Oracle to continue to offer its software products on allegations that various employees of Electronic Data Systems Corporation ("EDS") orHP’s Itanium-based servers for as long as HP have been misclassified as exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (" FLSA") and/or in violationdecided to sell such servers. The second phase of the trial was then postponed by Oracle’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Oracle’s “anti-SLAPP” motion, in which Oracle argued that HP’s damages claim infringed on Oracle’s First Amendment rights. On August 27, 2015, the California Labor CodeCourt of Appeals rejected Oracle’s appeal. The matter was remanded to the trial court for the second phase of the trial, which began on May 23, 2016 and was submitted to the jury on June 29, 2016. On June 30, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of HP, awarding HP approximately $3.0 billion in damages, which included approximately$1.7 billion for past lost profits and $1.3 billion for future lost profits. On October 20, 2016, the court entered judgment for HP for this amount with interest accruing until the judgment is paid. Oracle’s motion for new trial was denied on December 19, 2016, and Oracle filed its notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment on January 17, 2017. On February 2, 2017, HP filed a notice of cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest. The schedule for appellate briefing and argument has not yet been established. HP expects that the appeals process could take several years to complete. Litigation is unpredictable, and there can be no assurance that HP will recover damages, or other state laws. Those matters includethat any award of damages will be for the following:


Forsyth, et al. vs. HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company. This is a purported class and collective action filed on January 10, 2013August 18, 2016 in the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, against HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise alleging that certain technical support employees allegedly involvedthe defendants violated the Federal Age Discrimination in installing, maintaining and/or supporting computer software and/or hardware for HP were misclassified as exempt employeesEmployment Act (“ADEA”), the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, California public policy and the California Business and Professions Code by terminating older workers and replacing them with younger workers. Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide collective class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiff hasADEA comprised of all U.S. residents employed by defendants who had their employment terminated pursuant to a workforce reduction (“WFR”) plan on or after May 23, 2012 and who were 40 years of age or older. Plaintiffs also alleged that HP violatedseek to represent a Rule 23 class under California law comprised of all persons 40 years or older employed by among other things, allegedly improperly classifying these employeesdefendants in the state of California and terminated pursuant to a WFR plan on or after May 23, 2012. Following a partial motion to dismiss, a motion to strike and a motion to compel arbitration that the defendants filed in November 2016, the plaintiffs amended their complaint.  New plaintiffs were added, but the plaintiffs agreed that the class period for the nationwide collective action should be shortened and now starts on December 9, 2014. On January 30, 2017, the defendants filed another partial motion to dismiss and motions to compel arbitration as exempt.to several of the plaintiffs.  On February 13, 2014,March 20, 2017, the courtdefendants filed additional motions to compel arbitration as to a number of the opt-in plaintiffs. On September 20, 2017, the Court granted the plaintiff's motion for conditional class certification. On May 7, 2015,motions to compel arbitration as to the plaintiffs and opt-ins who signed WFR release agreements (17 individuals), and also stayed the entire case until the arbitrations are completed. The plaintiffs filed a motion to certify a Rule 23 state class of certain Technical Solutions Consultants in California, Massachusetts, and Colorado that they claim were improperly classified as exempt from overtime under state law. On July 30, 2015, the court dismissed the Technology Consultant and certain Field Technical Support Consultant opt-ins from the conditionally certified FLSA collective action. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has been assigned responsibility for this litigation.reconsideration, which is still pending.


India Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Proceedings.  On April 30 and May 10, 2010, the India Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (the "DRI"“DRI”) issued show cause notices to Hewlett-Packard India Sales Private Ltd ("Limited (“HP India"India”), a subsidiary of HP, seven HP India employees and one former HP India employee alleging that HP India underpaid customs duties while importing products and spare parts into India and seeking to recover an aggregate of approximately $370 million, plus penalties. Prior to the issuance of the show cause notices, HP India deposited approximately $16 million with the DRI


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

and agreed to post a provisional bond in exchange for the DRI'sDRI’s agreement to not seize HP India products and spare parts and to not interrupt the transaction of business by HP India.

On April 11, 2012, the Bangalore Commissioner of Customs issued an order on the products-related show cause notice affirming certain duties and penalties against HP India and the named individuals of approximately $386 million, of which HP India had already deposited $9 million. On December 11, 2012, HP India voluntarily deposited an additional $10 million in connection with the products-related show cause notice. The differential duty demand is subject to interest. On April 20, 2012, the Commissioner issued an order on the parts-related show cause notice affirming certain duties and penalties against HP India and certain of the named individuals of approximately $17 million, of which HP India had already deposited $7 million. After
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)


the order, HP India deposited an additional $3 million in connection with the parts-related show cause notice so as to avoid certain penalties.

HP India filed appeals of the Commissioner'sCommissioner’s orders before the Customs Tribunal along with applications for waiver of the pre-deposit of remaining demand amounts as a condition for hearing the appeals. The Customs Department has also filed cross-appeals before the Customs Tribunal. On January 24, 2013, the Customs Tribunal ordered HP India to deposit an additional $24 million against the products order, which HP India deposited in March 2013. The Customs Tribunal did not order any additional deposit to be made under the parts order. In December 2013, HP India filed applications before the Customs Tribunal seeking early hearing of the appeals as well as an extension of the stay of deposit as to HP India and the individuals already granted until final disposition of the appeals. On February 7, 2014, the application for extension of the stay of deposit was granted by the Customs Tribunal until disposal of the appeals. On October 27, 2014, the Customs Tribunal commenced hearings on the cross-appeals of the Commissioner'sCommissioner’s orders. The Customs Tribunal rejected HP India'sIndia’s request to remand the matter to the Commissioner on procedural grounds. The hearings scheduled to reconvene on April 6, 2015 and again on November 3, 2015 and April 11, 2016 were cancelled at the request of the Customs Tribunal. A new hearing datePursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has not been set.

agreed to indemnify HP in part, based on the extent to which any liability arises from the products and spare parts of Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s businesses.

Russia GPO and Other Anti-Corruption Investigations.  The German Public Prosecutor'sProsecutor’s Office ("(“German PPO"PPO”) has been conducting an investigation into allegations that current and former employees of HP engaged in bribery, embezzlement and tax evasion relating to a transaction between Hewlett-Packard ISE GmbH in Germany, a former subsidiary of HP, and the General Prosecutor'sProsecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. The approximately €35$35 million transaction, which was referred to as the Russia GPO deal, spanned the years 2001 to 2006 and was for the delivery and installation of an IT network. The German PPO issued an indictment of four individuals, including one current and two former HP employees, on charges including bribery, breach of trust and tax evasion. The German PPO also requested that HP be made an associated party to the case, and, if that request is granted, HP would participate in any portion of the court proceedings that could ultimately bear on the question of whether HP should be subject to potential disgorgement of profits based on the conduct of the indicted current and former employees. TheOn August 29, 2017, the Regional Court of Leipzig will determine whetherdecided not to admit the matter should be admitted to trial. If affirmed, this ruling will result in the termination of the prosecution. The Polish Central Anti-Corruption BureauGerman PPO has appealed this decision. The appeal is also investigating potential corruptcurrently pending with the Higher Regional Court in Dresden.
Class Actions re Authentication of Supplies. Five purported consumer class actions by a former employee of Hewlett-Packard Polska Sp. z o.o., a former indirect subsidiary of HP, in connection with certain public-sector transactions in Poland. HP is cooperating with these investigating agencies.

        On December 2, 2014, plaintiffs Petroleos Mexicanos and Pemex Exploracionwere filed a complaint against HP, arising out of the supplies authentication protocol in certain OfficeJet printers. This authentication protocol rejects some third-party ink cartridges that use non-HP security chips. Two of the cases were dismissed, and HP Mexicothe remaining cases have been consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,


Table captioned In re HP Printer Firmware Update Litigation. The remaining plaintiffs’ operative consolidated complaint was filed on March 22, 2017, alleging eleven causes of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigationaction: (1) unfair and Contingencies (Continued)

allegingunlawful business practices in violation of the Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq.; (2) fraudulent business practices in violation of the Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq.; (3) violations of the Racketeer InfluencedFalse Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500, et seq.; (4) violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq.; (5) violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices ‒ Consumer Protection Act, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 17.01, et seq.; (6) violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 19.86.010, et seq.; (7) violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, New Jersey Statutes Ann. 56:8-1, et seq.; (8) violations of the Computer Fraud and Corrupt OrganizationsAbuse Act, (RICO Act), fraudulent concealment, tortious interference, and18 U.S.C. § 1030, et seq.; (9) violations of the California Unfair Competition LawComputer Data Access and Fraud Act, Cal. Penal Code § 502; (10) Trespass to Chattels; and (11) Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations and/or Prospective Economic Advantage. The plaintiffs seek to certify a primary class of all persons in connection with alleged improper payments providedthe United States who purchased or owned the OfficeJet printers in question, and they alternatively seek to Pemex officials by third-parties retained bycertify subclasses of all such printer purchasers or owners in California, Texas, Washington, and/or New Jersey. On April 21, 2017, HP Mexico. These allegations arise from the same subject-matter as a previously disclosed 2014 Non-Prosecution Agreement between HP Mexico and the DOJ and a simultaneous cease-and-desist order against HP issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). On February 9, 2015, HP and HP Mexico filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. Onconsolidated complaint. The court held a hearing on July 13, 2015, the court granted the14, 2017. HP’s motion to dismiss and gave the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. The plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint on July 31, 2015. On August 21, 2015, HP and HP Mexico filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. On November 3, 2015, the parties settled the matter for no payment and the court dismissed this case with prejudice on November 4, 2015.

ECT Proceedings.remains pending.    In January 2011, the postal service of Brazil, Empresa Brasileira de Correios e Telégrafos ("ECT"), notified an HP subsidiary in Brazil ("HP Brazil") that it had initiated administrative proceedings to consider whether to suspend HP Brazil's right to bid and contract with ECT related to alleged improprieties in the bidding and contracting processes whereby employees of HP Brazil and employees of several other companies allegedly coordinated their bids and fixed results for three ECT contracts in 2007 and 2008. In late July 2011, ECT notified HP Brazil it had decided to apply the penalties against HP Brazil and suspend HP Brazil's right to bid and contract with ECT for five years, based upon the evidence before it. In August 2011, HP Brazil appealed ECT's decision. In April 2013, ECT rejected HP Brazil's appeal, and the administrative proceedings were closed with the penalties against HP Brazil remaining in place. In parallel, in September 2011, HP Brazil filed a civil action against ECT seeking to have ECT's decision revoked. HP Brazil also requested an injunction suspending the application of the penalties until a final ruling on the merits of the case. The court of first instance has not issued a decision on the merits of the case, but it has denied HP Brazil's request for injunctive relief. HP Brazil appealed the denial of its request for injunctive relief to the intermediate appellate court, which issued a preliminary ruling denying the request for injunctive relief but reducing the length of the sanctions from five to two years. HP Brazil appealed that decision and, in December 2011, obtained a ruling staying enforcement of ECT's sanctions until a final ruling on the merits of the case. HP expects the decision to be issued in 2016 and any subsequent appeal on the merits to last several years. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has been assigned responsibility for this litigation.

Cisco Systems.    On August 21, 2015, Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco Systems") and Cisco Systems Capital Corporation ("Cisco Capital") filed an action in Santa Clara County Superior Court for declaratory judgment and breach of contract against HP in connection with a dispute arising out of a third-party's termination of a services contract with HP. As part of that third-party services contract, HP separately contracted with Cisco on an agreement to utilize Cisco products and services. HP prepaid the entire amount due Cisco through a financing arrangement with Cisco Capital. Following the termination of HP services contract with the third-party, HP no longer required Cisco's products and services, and, accordingly, exercised its contractual termination rights under the agreement with Cisco, and requested that Cisco apply the appropriate credit toward the remaining balance owed Cisco Capital. This lawsuit relates to the calculation of that credit under the agreement between Cisco and HP. Cisco contends that after the credit is applied, HP still owes Cisco Capital approximately $58 million. HP contends that under a proper reading of the agreement, HP owes nothing to Cisco


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16:14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

Capital, and that Cisco owes significant amounts to HP. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has been assigned responsibility for this litigation.

Stockholder Litigation.    As described below, HP is involved in various stockholder litigation matters commenced against certain current and former HP executive officers and/or certain current and former members of HP's Board of Directors in which the plaintiffs are seeking to recover damages related to HP's allegedly inflated stock price, certain compensation paid by HP to the defendants, other damages and/or injunctive relief:


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

Autonomy-Related Legal Matters

Investigations.  As a result of the findings of an ongoing investigation, HP has provided information to the U.K. Serious Fraud Office, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ"(“DOJ”) and the SEC related to the accounting improprieties, disclosure failures and misrepresentations at Autonomy that occurred prior to and in connection with HP'sHP’s acquisition of Autonomy. On November 21, 2012, DOJ representatives advised HP that they had opened an investigation relating to Autonomy. On February 6, 2013, representatives of the U.K. Serious Fraud Office advised HP that they had also opened an investigation relating to Autonomy. On January 19, 2015, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office notified HP that it was closing its investigation and had decided to cede jurisdiction of the investigation to the U.S. authorities. On November 14, 2016, the DOJ announced that a federal grand jury indicted Sushovan Hussain, the former CFO of Autonomy, on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and multiple counts of wire fraud.  The indictment alleges that Hussain engaged in a scheme to defraud purchasers and sellers of securities of Autonomy and HP about the true performance of Autonomy’s business, its financial condition, and its prospects for growth.  Trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on February 26, 2018. On November 15, 2016, the SEC announced that Stouffer Egan, the former CEO of Autonomy’s U.S.-based operations, settled charges relating to his participation in an accounting scheme to meet internal sales targets and analyst revenue expectations.  HP is cooperatingcontinuing to cooperate with the DOJ and the SEC, whose investigations are ongoing.ongoing enforcement actions.

Litigation.  As described below, HP is involved in various stockholder litigation relating to, among other things, its October 2011 acquisition of Autonomy and its November 20, 2012 announcement that it recorded a non-cash charge for the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets within its SoftwareHewlett Packard Enterprise’s software segment of approximately $8.8 billion in the fourth quarter of its 2012 fiscal year and HP'sHP’s statements that, based on HP'sHP’s findings from an ongoing investigation, the majority of this impairment charge related to accounting improprieties, misrepresentations to the market and disclosure failures at Autonomy that occurred prior to and in connection with HP'sHP’s acquisition of Autonomy and the impact of those improprieties, failures and misrepresentations on the expected future financial performance of the Autonomy business over the long term. This stockholder litigation was commenced against, among others, certain current and former HP executive officers, certain current and former members of HP'sHP’s Board of Directors and certain advisors to HP. The plaintiffs in these litigation matters are seeking to recover certain compensation paid by HP to the defendants and/or other damages. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise share equally the cost and any damages arising from these litigation matters. These matters include the following:

In re HP Securities Litigation consists of two consolidated putative class actions filed on November 26 and 30, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

enriched and violated Sections 25402 and 25403 of the California Corporations Code. On May 3, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint alleging, among other things, that the defendants concealed material information and made false statements related to HP'sHP’s acquisition of Autonomy and Autonomy'sAutonomy’s Intelligent Data Operating Layer technology and thereby violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, breached their fiduciary duties, engaged in "abuse“abuse of control"control” over HP, corporate waste and were unjustly enriched. The litigation was stayed until June 2014. The lead plaintiff filed a stipulation of proposed settlement on June 30, 2014. The court declined to grant preliminary approval to this settlement, and, on December 19, 2014, also declined to grant preliminary approval to a revised version of the settlement. On January 22, 2015, the lead plaintiff moved for preliminary approval of a further revised version of the settlement. On March 13, 2015, the court issued an order granting preliminary approval to the settlement. On July 24, 2015, the court held a hearing to

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

Cook matter was dismissed on August 19, 2015.

Autonomy Corporation Limited v. Michael Lynch and Sushovan Hussain. On April 17, 2015, four HP subsidiaries (Autonomy Corporation Limited, Hewlett Packard Vision BV, Autonomy Systems, Limited, and Autonomy, Inc.)
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)


initiated civil proceedings in the U.K. High Court of Justice against two members of Autonomy'sAutonomy’s former management, Michael Lynch and Sushovan Hussain. The Particulars of Claim seek damages in excess of $5 billion from Messrs. Lynch and Hussain for breach of their fiduciary duties by causing Autonomy group companies to engage in improper transactions and accounting practices. On October 1, 2015, Messrs. Lynch and Hussain filed their defenses. Mr. Lynch also filed a counterclaim against Autonomy Corporation Limited seeking $160 million in damages, among other things, for alleged misstatements regarding Lynch. The HPHewlett Packard Enterprise subsidiary claimants will have an opportunity to file a responsefiled their replies to the defenses and the asserted counterclaim.counter-claim on March 11, 2016. The parties are actively engaged in the disclosure process. A six-month trial is scheduled to begin on January 28, 2019.


In re HP ERISA Litigation consists of three consolidated putative class actions filed beginning on December 6, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging, among other things, that from August 18, 2011 to November 22, 2012, the defendants breached their fiduciary obligations to HP'sHP’s 401(k) Plan and its participants and thereby violated

Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)

Environmental

        HP's

HP’s operations and products are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, including laws addressing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, the content of HP'sHP’s products and the recycling, treatment and disposal of those products. In particular, HP faces increasing complexity in its product design and procurement operations as it adjusts to new and future requirements relating to the chemical and materials composition of its products, their safe use, and the energy consumption associated with those products, including requirements relating to climate change. HP is also subject to legislation in an increasing number of jurisdictions that makes producers of electrical goods, including computers and printers, financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products (sometimes referred to as "product“product take-back legislation"legislation”). HP could incur substantial costs, its products could be restricted from entering certain jurisdictions, and it could face other sanctions, if it were to violate or become liable under environmental laws or if its products become non-compliantnoncompliant with environmental laws. HP'sHP’s potential exposure includes fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims and clean-up costs. The amount and timing of costs to comply with environmental laws are difficult to predict.

HP is party to, or otherwise involved in, proceedings brought by U.S. or state environmental agencies under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"(“CERCLA”), known as "Superfund,"“Superfund,” or state laws similar to CERCLA, and may become a party to, or otherwise involved in, proceedings brought by private parties for contribution towards clean-up costs. HP is also conducting environmental investigations or remediations at several current or
former operating sites pursuant to administrative orders or consent agreements with state environmental agencies.

The separation and distribution agreement includes provisions that provide for the allocation of environmental liabilities between HP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise including certain remediation obligations; responsibilities arising from the chemical and materials composition of their respective products, their safe use and their energy consumption; obligations under product take back legislation that addresses the collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of products; and other environmental matters. HP will generally be responsible for environmental liabilities related to the properties and other assets, including products, allocated to HP under the separation and distribution agreement and other ancillary agreements. Under these agreements, HP will indemnify Hewlett Packard Enterprise for liabilities for specified ongoing remediation projects, subject to certain limitations, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a payment obligation for a specified portion of the cost of those remediation projects. In addition, HP will share with Hewlett Packard Enterprise other environmental liabilities as set forth in the separation and distribution agreement. HP is indemnified in whole or in part by Hewlett Packard Enterprise for liabilities
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 14: Litigation and Contingencies (Continued)


arising from the assets assigned to Hewlett Packard Enterprise and for certain environmental matters as detailed in the separation and distribution agreement.
Note 17:15: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties

Guarantees

In the ordinary course of business, HP may issue performance guarantees to certain of its clients, customers and other parties pursuant to which HP has guaranteed the performance obligations of third parties. Some of those guarantees may be backed by standby letters of credit or surety bonds. In general, HP would be obligated to perform over the term of the guarantee in the event a specified


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 17: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties (Continued)

triggering event occurs as defined by the guarantee. HP believes the likelihood of having to perform under a material guarantee is remote.

        HP has entered into service contracts with certain of its clients that are supported by financing arrangements. If a service contract is terminated as a result of HP's non-performance under the contract or failure to comply with the terms of the financing arrangement, HP could, under certain circumstances, be required to acquire certain assets related to the service contract. HP believes the likelihood of having to acquire a material amount of assets under these arrangements is remote.


Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of business, HP enters into contractual arrangements under which HP may agree to indemnify a third party to such arrangement from any losses incurred relating to the services they perform on behalf of HP or for losses arising from certain events as defined within the particular contract, which may include, for example, litigation or claims relating to past performance. HP also provides indemnifications to certain vendors and customers against claims of IP infringement made by third parties arising from the vendors'vendors’ and customers'customers’ use of HP'sHP’s software products and services and certain other matters. Some indemnifications may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, payments made related to these indemnifications have been immaterial.

Cross-Indemnifications with Hewlett Packard Enterprise
 Under the separation and distribution agreement, HP agreed to indemnify Hewlett Packard Enterprise, each of its subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, among other matters, the liabilities allocated to HP as part of the Separation. Hewlett Packard Enterprise similarly agreed to indemnify HP, each of its subsidiaries and each of their respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from, among other matters, the liabilities allocated to Hewlett Packard Enterprise as part of the Separation. HP expects Hewlett Packard Enterprise to fully perform under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement.

  For information on the cross-indemnifications related to the tax matter agreements and litigations effective upon the Separation on November 1, 2015, see Note 6, "Taxes“Taxes on Earnings"Earnings” and Note 16 "Litigation14, “Litigation and Contingencies"Contingencies”, respectively.

Warranties

HP accrues the estimated cost of product warranties at the time it recognizes revenue. HP engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its component suppliers; however, contractual warranty terms, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, current period product shipments and ongoing product failure rates, as well as specific product class failures outside of HP'sHP’s baseline experience, affect the estimated warranty obligation.


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 17: Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties (Continued)

        HP's

HP’s aggregate product warranty liabilities and changes were as follows:


 As of October 31 As of October 31

 2015 2014 2017 2016

 In millions
 In millions

Balance at beginning of year

 $1,956 $2,031 $980
 $1,184

Accruals for warranties issued

 1,507 1,840 925
 966

Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)

 (32) 12 (8) (23)

Settlements made (in cash or in kind)

 (1,723) (1,927)(999) (1,147)

Balance at end of year

 $1,708 $1,956 $898
 $980

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)



Note 18:16: Commitments

Lease Commitments

HP leases certain real and personal property under non-cancelable operating leases. Certain leases require HP to pay property taxes, insurance and routine maintenance and include renewal options and escalation clauses. Rent expense from continuing operations was approximately $1.0$0.2 billion in each of fiscal 2015, 2014years 2017, 2016 and 2013.

        Property under capital leases was comprised primarily of equipment and furniture. Capital lease assets included in Property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $207 million and $229 million as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Accumulated depreciation on the property under capital leases was $187 million and $207 million as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

2015.

As of October 31, 2015,2017, future minimum operating lease commitments were as follows:

Fiscal year
 In millions 

2016

 $624 

2017

  517 

2018

  379 

2019

  310 

2020

  237 

Thereafter

  801 

Less: Sublease rental income

  (77)

Total(1)

 $2,791 

(1)
Subsequent to the Separation, HP expects the total remaining future minimum operating lease commitments to be approximately $367 million.

Fiscal yearIn millions
2018$288
2019213
2020147
202199
202283
Thereafter401
Less: Sublease rental income(174)
Total$1,057
Unconditional Purchase Obligations

As of October 31, 2015,2017, HP had unconditional purchase obligations of approximately $2.7 billion.$1,208 million. These unconditional purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on HP and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the approximate


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 18: Commitments (Continued)

timing of the transaction. These unconditional purchase obligations are primarily related principally to inventory and service support and other items.support. Unconditional purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.

As of October 31, 2015, future2017, unconditional purchase obligations were as follows:

Fiscal year
 In millions 

2016

 $1,126 

2017

  473 

2018

  471 

2019

  342 

2020

  109 

Thereafter

  133 

Total(1)

 $2,654 

(1)
Subsequent to
Fiscal yearIn millions
2018$728
2019289
2020116
202152
202221
Thereafter2
Total$1,208

Note 17: Discontinued Operations

 On November 1, 2015, HP completed the Separation of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. After the Separation, HP expectsdoes not beneficially own any shares of Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock.
The following table presents the total remaining future unconditional purchase obligations to be approximately $915 million.financial results of HP’s discontinued operations:

Table of Contents

HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


 For the fiscal years ended October 31
 2017 2016 2015
 In millions
Net revenue$
 $
 $51,892
Cost of revenue(1)

 
 37,072
Expenses(2)

 201
 13,269
Interest and other, net(3)(4)
(47) (208) 351
Earnings from discontinued operations before taxes$47
 $7
 $1,200
Provision for taxes(4)
(47) (177) (364)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations$
 $(170) $836

(1)
Cost of products, cost of services and financing interest.

(2)
Expenses for fiscal year 2016 were primarily related to separation costs.

(3)
In fiscal year 2015, allocation of interest to Hewlett Packard Enterprise was based on using the average effective interest rate of the debt assumed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the debt repaid as part of the Separation. In fiscal year 2015, Interest and other, net also includes loss from the early extinguishment of debt in connection with the review of HP’s capital structure and the Separation.

(4)
In connection with the TMA, Interest and other, net for fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2016 includes changes in the tax indemnifications amounts of $47 million and $208 million, respectively. Provision for taxes for fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2016 includes the tax impact relating to the above described changes of $47 million and $201 million, respectively. For more information on tax indemnifications and the TMA, see Note 6, “Taxes on Earnings”.

The following table presents the significant non-cash items and capital expenditures of HP’s discontinued operations:
cFor the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015
 In millions
Depreciation and amortization$3,657
Purchases of property, plant and equipment$3,020


Note 18: Divestitures
During fiscal year 2016, HP entered into agreements to divest certain technology assets, including licensing and distribution rights, for certain software offerings to Open Text Corporation, an enterprise information management company for $475 million. These divestitures were substantially completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016. The technology assets sold were previously reported within the Commercial Hardware business unit within the Printing segment. The total gain recognized from the divestitures was $401 million. The gains associated with these divestitures were included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 19: Subsequent Events
On November 1, 2017, HP made a cash payment of $1.1 billion to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in connection with the acquisition of its printer business. The cash payment is subject to adjustment and is expected to be final during fiscal year 2018.



HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Quarterly Summary
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per share amounts)

 
 For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal 2015
 
 
 January 31 April 30 July 31 October 31 

Net revenue

 $26,839 $25,453 $25,349 $25,714 

Cost of sales(1)

  20,571  19,345  19,317  19,363 

Research and development

  825  850  893  934 

Selling, general and administrative

  3,071  3,063  2,962  3,089 

Amortization of intangible assets

  222  221  242  246 

Restructuring charges

  146  255  25  591 

Acquisition and other related charges

  4  19  47  20 

Separation costs

  80  269  401  509 

Defined benefit plan settlement charges

      114  54 

Impairment of data center assets

      136   

Total costs and expenses

  24,919  24,022  24,137  24,806 

Earnings from operations

  1,920  1,431  1,212  908 

Interest and other, net

  (174) (139) (108) (318)

Earnings before taxes

  1,746  1,292  1,104  590 

Provision for taxes

  (380) (281) (250) 733 

Net earnings

 $1,366 $1,011 $854 $1,323 

Net earnings per share:(2)

             

Basic

 $0.75 $0.56 $0.47 $0.73 

Diluted

 $0.73 $0.55 $0.47 $0.73 

Cash dividends paid per share

 $0.16 $0.16 $0.18 $0.18 

Range of per share stock prices on the New York Stock Exchange

             

Low

 $35.77 $31.00 $29.52 $24.30 

High

 $41.10 $38.86 $35.60 $30.78 


 
 For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal 2014
 
 
 January 31 April 30 July 31 October 31 

Net revenue

 $28,154 $27,309 $27,585 $28,406 

Cost of sales(1)

  21,736  20,704  20,974  21,425 

Research and development

  811  873  887  876 

Selling, general and administrative

  3,210  3,391  3,388  3,364 

Amortization of intangible assets

  283  264  227  226 

Restructuring charges

  114  252  649  604 

Acquisition and other related charges

  3  3  2  3 

Total costs and expenses

  26,157  25,487  26,127  26,498 

Earnings from operations

  1,997  1,822  1,458  1,908 

Interest and other, net

  (163) (174) (145) (146)

Earnings before taxes

  1,834  1,648  1,313  1,762 

Provision for taxes

  (409) (375) (328) (432)

Net earnings

 $1,425 $1,273 $985 $1,330 

Net earnings per share:(2)

             

Basic

 $0.75 $0.67 $0.53 $0.71 

Diluted

 $0.74��$0.66 $0.52 $0.70 

Cash dividends paid per share

 $0.15 $0.15 $0.16 $0.16 

Range of per share stock prices on the New York Stock Exchange

             

Low

 $24.50 $27.89 $31.21 $31.62 

High

 $30.13 $33.90 $36.21 $38.25 


For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal year 2017
 January 31
April 30
July 31
October 31
Net revenue$12,684

$12,385

$13,060

$13,927
Cost of revenue10,436

10,002

10,633

11,407
Research and development296

314

289

291
Selling, general and administrative1,017

1,087

1,096

1,176
 Restructuring and other charges
63

140

46

113
Acquisition-related charges16
 20
 40
 49
Amortization of intangible assets

1




Defined benefit plan settlement charges
 3
 1
 1
Total costs and expenses11,828

11,567

12,105

13,037
Earnings from operations856

818

955

890
Interest and other, net(81)
(64)
(56)
(42)
Earnings before taxes775

754

899

848
Provision for taxes(164)
(195)
(203)
(188)
Net earnings$611

$559

$696

$660
Net earnings per share:(1)











Basic$0.36

$0.33

$0.41

$0.40
Diluted$0.36

$0.33

$0.41

$0.39
Cash dividends paid per share$0.13

$0.14

$0.13

$0.13
Range of per share stock prices on the New York Stock Exchange










Low$14.12

$14.84

$17.10

$18.36
High$16.25

$18.83

$19.58

$22.31
(1)
Cost of products, cost of services and financing interest.

(2)
Net EPS for each quarter is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during that quarter, while EPS for the fiscal year is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the year. Thus the sum of the EPS for each of the four quarters may not equal the EPS for the fiscal year.

Table of Contentscontents



 
For the three-month fiscal periods
ended in fiscal year 2016
 January 31 April 30 July 31 October 31
Net revenue$12,246
 $11,588
 $11,892
 $12,512
  Cost of revenue9,961
 9,338
 9,720
 10,221
Research and development292
 301
 298
 318
Selling, general and administrative1,037
 1,002
 719
 1,075
Restructuring and other charges20
 100
 36
 49
Acquisition-related charges
 
 
 7
Amortization of intangible assets8
 6
 2
 
Defined benefit plan settlement charges
 
 
 179
Total costs and expenses11,318
 10,747
 10,775
 11,849
Earnings from continuing operations928
 841
 1,117
 663
Interest and other, net(94) (5) (36) 347
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes834
 836
 1,081
 1,010
Provision for taxes(184) (176) (238) (497)
Net earnings from continuing operations650
 660
 843
 513
Net loss from discontinued operations(58) (31) (60) (21)
Net earnings$592
 $629
 $783
 $492
Net loss per share:(1)
 
  
  
  
Basic       
Continuing operations$0.37
 $0.38
 $0.49
 $0.30
Discontinued operations(0.04) (0.01) (0.03) (0.01)
Total basic net earnings per share$0.33
 $0.37
 $0.46
 $0.29
Diluted       
Continuing operations$0.36
 $0.38
 $0.49
 $0.30
Discontinued operations(0.03) (0.02) (0.04) (0.02)
Total diluted net earnings per share$0.33
 $0.36
 $0.45
 $0.28
Cash dividends paid per share$0.12
 $0.12
 $0.12
 $0.12
Range of per share stock prices on the New York Stock Exchange 
  
  
  
Low$9.24
 $8.91
 $11.31
 $13.55
High$14.82
 $12.96
 $14.27
 $15.88

(1)
Net EPS for each quarter is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during that quarter, while EPS for the fiscal year is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the year. Hence, the sum of the EPS for each of the four quarters may not equal the EPS for the fiscal year.
Table of contents


ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report (the "Evaluation Date"“Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to HP, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to HP'sHP’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

        During the fourth qurter of fiscal 2015, under

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we completedconducted an evaluation of any changes in our preparations and implementation for a series of changes to our information technology environment, which includes ourinternal control over financial reporting systems, to support(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the separateExchange Act) that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial reporting requirements for HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. There were no other changesofficer concluded that there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during fiscal 2015year 2017 that havehas materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

See Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on our internal control over financial reporting in Item 8, which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9B. Other Information.

None.




PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The names of the executive officers of HP and their ages, titles and biographies as of the date hereof are incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 1, above.

The following information is included in HP'sHP’s Proxy Statement related to its 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after HP'sHP’s fiscal year end of October 31, 20152017 (the "Proxy Statement"“Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference:

Information regarding directors of HP who are standing for reelection and any persons nominated to become directors of HP is set forth under "Proposals to be Voted On—“Corporate Governance—Management Proposal No. 1—1 Election of Directors."

Information regarding HP'sHP’s Audit Committee and designated "audit“audit committee financial experts"experts” is set forth under "Board Structure“Corporate Governance—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—Board Committees and Committee Composition—Audit Committee."

Information on HP'sHP’s code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, also known as the "Standards“Standards of Business Conduct,"Conduct”, is set forth under “Corporate Governance—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—Code of Conduct” and information on HP'sHP’s Corporate Governance Guidelines is set forth under "Corporate“—Corporate Governance PrinciplesHighlights”, “—Director Nominees and Board Matters."

Director Nominees’ Experience and Qualifications” and “—Director Independence.”
Information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance is set forth under "Section“Ownership of Our Stock—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance."

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.

The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:

Information regarding HP'sHP’s compensation of its named executive officers is set forth under "Executive“Executive Compensation."

Information regarding HP'sHP’s compensation of its directors is set forth under "Director“Corporate Governance—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines."

The report of HP'sHP’s HR and Compensation Committee is set forth under "HR“Executive Compensation—Management Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation—HR and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation."

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and executive officers is set forth under "Common“Ownership of Our Stock—Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."

Information regarding HP'sHP’s equity compensation plans, including both stockholder approved plans and non-stockholder approved plans, is set forth in the section entitled "Equity“Executive Compensation—Management Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information."

Table of Contents

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The following information is included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference:

Information regarding transactions with related persons is set forth under "Transactions with“Corporate Governance—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—Fiscal 2016 Related Persons."

Person Transactions.”
Information regarding director independence is set forth under "Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters—“Corporate Governance—Management Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors—Director Independence."

Table of contents


ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Information regarding principal accounting fees and services is set forth under "Principal“Audit Matters—Management Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Principal Accounting Fees and Services"Services” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.




PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.

    (a)
    The following documents are filed as part of this report:

    1.
    All Financial Statements:

The following financial statements are filed as part of this report under Item 8—"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Quarterly Summary

2.Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules are omitted as the required information is not applicable or the information is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8 above.

3.
Exhibits:

        A list of exhibits filed or furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (or incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed or furnished by HP) is provided in the accompanying Exhibit Index. HP will furnish copies of exhibits for a reasonable fee (covering the expense of furnishing copies) upon request. Stockholders may request exhibits copies by contacting:

        HP Inc.
        Attn: Investor Relations
        1501 Page Mill Road
        Palo Alto, CA 94304







HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)
Filing Date
2(a)8-K001-044232.1
November 5, 2015
2(b)8-K001-044232.2
November 5, 2015
2(c)8-K001-044232.3
November 5, 2015
2(d)8-K001-044232.4
November 5, 2015
2(e)8-K001-044232.5
November 5, 2015
2(f)8-K001-044232.6
November 5, 2015
2(g)8-K001-044232.7
November 5, 2015
3(a)10-Q001-044233(a)
June 12, 1998
3(b)10-Q001-044233(b)
March 16, 2001
3(c)8-K001-044233.2
October 22, 2015
3(d)8-K001-044233.1
April 7, 2016
3(e)8-K001-044233.2
July 26, 2017
4(a)S-3333-1343274.1
December 15, 2016
4(b)S-3333-307864.2
December 15, 2016
4(c)Form of Registrant’s 3.750% Global Note due December 1, 2020 and form of related Officers’ Certificate.8-K001-04423
4.2 and 4.3

December 2, 2010
4(d)Form of Registrant’s 4.300% Global Note due June 1, 2021 and form of related Officers’ Certificate.8-K001-04423
4.5 and 4.6

June 1, 2011
4(e)Form of Registrant’s 4.375% Global Note due September 15, 2021 and 6.000% Global Note due September 15, 2041 and form of related Officers’ Certificate.8-K001-04423
4.4, 4.5 and 4.6

September 19, 2011
4(f)Form of Registrant’s 4.650% Global Note due December 9, 2021 and related Officers’ Certificate.8-K001-04423
4.3 and 4.4

December 12, 2011
4(g)Form of Registrant’s 4.050% Global Note due September 15, 2022 and related Officers’ Certificate.8-K001-04423
4.2 and 4.3

March 12, 2012
4(h)Form of Registrant’s 2.750% Global Note due January 14, 2019 and Floating Rate Global Note due January 14, 2019 and related Officers’ Certificate.8-K001-04423
4.1, 4.2 and 4.3

January 14, 2014
4(i)8-A/A001-044234.1
June 23, 2006
9None.
10(a)S-8333-1142534.1
April 7, 2004
10(b)8-K001-0442310.2
September 21, 2006
10(c)8-K001-0442399.3
November 23, 2005


Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)
Filing Date
10(d)10-K001-0442310(h)
December 14, 2011
10(e)10-Q001-0442310(u)(u)
June 13, 2002
10(f)10-Q001-0442310(v)(v)
June 13, 2002
10(g)8-K001-0442310.2
March 22, 2005
10(h)8-K001-0442310.2
January 24, 2008
10(i)10-Q001-0442310(o)(o)
March 10, 2008
10(j)10-Q001-0442310(p)(p)
March 10, 2008
10(k)10-Q001-0442310(t)(t)
June 6, 2008
10(l)10-Q001-0442310(u)(u)
June 6, 2008
10(m)10-K001-0442310(y)(y)
December 18, 2008
10(n)10-Q001-0442310(b)(b)(b)
March 10, 2009
10(o)10-K001-0442310(i)(i)(i)
December 15, 2010
10(p)10-K001-0442310(j)(j)(j)
December 15, 2010
10(q)10-K001-0442310(k)(k)(k)
December 15, 2010
10(r)8-K001-0442310.2
March 21, 2013
10(s)10-Q001-0442310(u)(u)
March 11, 2014
10(t)10-Q001-0442310(v)(v)
March 11, 2014
10(u)10-Q001-0442310(w)(w)
March 11, 2014
10(v)10-Q001-0442310(x)(x)
March 11, 2014
10(w)10-Q001-0442310(y)(y)
March 11, 2014
10(x)10-Q001-0442310(z)(z)
March 11, 2014
10(y)10-Q001-0442310(a)(a)(a)
March 11, 2014
10(z)10-Q001-0442310(b)(b)(b)
March 11, 2014
10(a)(a)10-Q001-0442310(c)(c)(c)
March 11, 2015
10(b)(b)10-Q001-0442310(d)(d)(d)
March 11, 2015
10(c)(c)10-Q001-0442310(e)(e)(e)
March 11, 2015
10(d)(d)10-Q001-0442310(f)(f)(f)
March 11, 2015
10(e)(e)10-Q001-0442310(g)(g)(g)
March 11, 2015
10(f)(f)10-Q001-0442310(h)(h)(h)
March 11, 2015
10(g)(g)10-Q001-0442310(i)(i)(i)
March 11, 2015
10(h)(h)10-Q001-0442310(b)(b)(b)
June 8, 2015


Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)
Filing Date
10(i)(i)10-Q001-0442310(c)(c)(c)
June 8, 2015
10(j)(j)8-K001-0442310.1
November 5, 2015
10(k)(k)10-K001-0442310(e)(e)(e)
December 16, 2015
10(l)(l)10-K001-0442310(f)(f)(f)
December 16, 2015
10(m)(m)10-K001-0442310(g)(g)(g)
December 16, 2015
10(n)(n)
10(o)(o)10-Q001-0442310(o)(o)
March 3, 2016
10(p)(p)10-Q001-0442310(p)(p)
March 3, 2016
10(q)(q)10-Q001-0442310(q)(q)
March 3, 2016
10(r)(r)10-Q001-0442310(r)(r)
March 3, 2016
10(s)(s)10-Q001-0442310(s)(s)
March 3, 2016
10(t)(t)10-Q001-0442310(t)(t)
March 3, 2016
10(u)(u)10-K001-0442310(u)(u)
December 15, 2016
10(v)(v)10-Q001-0442310(v)(v)
March 2, 2017
10(w)(w)10-Q001-0442310(w)(w)
March 2, 2017
10(x)(x)10-Q001-0442310(x)(x)
March 2, 2017
10(y)(y)10-Q001-0442310(y)(y)
March 2, 2017
10(z)(z)10-Q001-0442310(z)(z)
March 2, 2017
10(a)(a)(a)10-Q001-0442310(a)(a)(a)
March 2, 2017
11None.
12
13None.
14None.
15None.
18None.
21
22None.
23
24Power of Attorney (included on the signature page).


Exhibit
Number
Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)
Filing Date
31.1
31.2
32
101.INSXBRL Instance Document.†
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.†
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.†
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.†
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.†
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.†

* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
** Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Registration S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request.
† Filed herewith.
†† Furnished herewith.

The registrant agrees to furnish to the Commission supplementally upon request a copy of (1) any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed herewith as to which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and (2) any omitted schedules to any material plan of acquisition, disposition or reorganization set forth above.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: December 16, 201514, 2017HP INC.

 

By:

By:


/s/ CATHERINE A. LESJAK

Catherine A. Lesjak
Chief Financial Officer






POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Catherine A. Lesjak, Kim Rivera and Ruairidh Ross, or any of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact, for such person in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact, or substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitle(s)Date





/s/ DION J. WEISLER


Dion J. Weisler

 

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Title(s)
 December 16, 2015Date

/s/ CATHERINE A. LESJAK


Catherine A. Lesjak

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

December 16, 2015

/s/ MARIE E. MYERS


Marie E. Myers

Global Controller and Head of
Finance Services
(Principal Accounting Officer)

December 16, 2015

/s/ SHUMEET BANERJI


Shumeet Banerji

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ CARL BASS


Carl Bass

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ ROBERT R. BENNETT


Robert R. Bennett

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ CHARLES V. BERGH


Charles V. Bergh

Director

December 16, 2015


Table of Contents

SignatureTitle(s)Date





/s/ STACY BROWN-PHILPOT


Stacy Brown-Philpot

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ STEPHANIE BURNS


Stephanie Burns

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ MARY ANNE CITRINO


Mary Anne Citrino

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ RAJIV L. GUPTA


Rajiv L. Gupta

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ STACEY MOBLEY


Stacey Mobley

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ SUBRA SURESH


Subra Suresh

Director

December 16, 2015

/s/ MARGARET C. WHITMAN


Margaret C. Whitman

Director

December 16, 2015


Table of Contents


HP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
2(a)Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 2, 2015, among the Registrant, Aspen Acquisition Sub, Inc. and Aruba Networks, Inc.**8-K001-044232.1March 2, 2015

2(b)


Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2015, by and among Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and the Other Parties Thereto.**


8-K


001-04423


2.1


November 5, 2015

2(c)


Transition Services Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.**


8-K


001-04423


2.2


November 5, 2015

2(d)


Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2015, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.**


8-K


001-04423


2.3


November 5, 2015

2(e)


Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2015, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.**


8-K


001-04423


2.4


November 5, 2015

2(f)


Real Estate Matters Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2015, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.**


8-K


001-04423


2.5


November 5, 2015

2(g)


Master Commercial Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.**


8-K


001-04423


2.6


November 5, 2015

2(h)


Information Technology Service Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, by and between Hewlett-Packard Company and HP Enterprise Services, LLC.**


8-K


001-04423


2.7


November 5, 2015

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
3(a)Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation.10-Q001-044233(a)June 12, 1998

3(b)


Registrant's Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation.


10-Q


001-04423


3(b)


March 16, 2001

3(c)


Registrant's Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Redeemable Preferred Stock


8-K


001-04423


3.1


October 22, 2015

3(d)


Registrant's Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation.


8-K


001-04423


3.2


October 22, 2015

3(e)


Registrant's Amended and Restated Bylaws.


8-K


001-04423


3.3


October 22, 2015

4(a)


Senior Indenture between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (formerly known as Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association), as Trustee, dated June 1, 2000.


S-3


333-134327


4.9


June 7, 2006

4(b)


Form of Subordinated Indenture.


S-3


333-30786


4.2


March 17, 2000

4(c)


Form of Registrant's 3.750% Global Note due December 1, 2020 and form of related Officers' Certificate.


8-K


001-04423


4.2 and 4.3


December 2, 2010

4(d)


Form of Registrant's 4.300% Global Note due June 1, 2021 and form of related Officers' Certificate.


8-K


001-04423


4.5 and 4.6


June 1, 2011

4(e)


Form of Registrant's 4.375% Global Note due September 15, 2021 and 6.000% Global Note due September 15, 2041 and form of related Officers' Certificate.


8-K


001-04423


4.4, 4.5 and 4.6


September 19, 2011

4(f)


Form of Registrant's 4.650% Global Note due December 9, 2021 and related Officers' Certificate.


8-K


001-04423


4.3 and 4.4


December 12, 2011

4(g)


Form of Registrant's 4.050% Global Note due September 15, 2022 and related Officers' Certificate.


8-K


001-04423


4.2 and 4.3


March 12, 2012

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
4(h)Form of Registrant's 2.750% Global Note due January 14, 2019 and Floating Rate Global Note due January 14, 2019 and related Officers' Certificate.8-K001-044234.1, 4.2 and 4.3January 14, 2014

4(i)


Specimen certificate for the Registrant's common stock.


8-A/A


001-04423


4.1


June 23, 2006

4(j)


Senior Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee.


8-K


001-04423


4.1


October 13, 2015

4(k)


First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 2.450% notes due 2017.


8-K


001-04423


4.2


October 13, 2015

4(l)


Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 2.850% notes due 2018.


8-K


001-04423


4.3


October 13, 2015

4(m)


Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 3.600% notes due 2020.


8-K


001-04423


4.4


October 13, 2015

4(n)


Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 4.400% notes due 2022.


8-K


001-04423


4.5


October 13, 2015

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
4(o)Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 4.900% notes due 2025.8-K001-044234.6October 13, 2015

4(p)


Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 6.200% notes due 2035.


8-K


001-04423


4.7


October 13, 2015

4(q)


Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's 6.350% notes due 2045.


8-K


001-04423


4.8


October 13, 2015

4(r)


Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's floating rate notes due 2017.


8-K


001-04423


4.9


October 13, 2015

4(s)


Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's floating rate notes due 2018.


8-K


001-04423


4.10


October 13, 2015

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
4(t)Guarantee Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2015, between Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, in favor of the holders of the Notes.8-K001-044234.11October 13, 2015

4(u)


Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2015, among Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett-Packard Company, and the representatives of the initial purchasers of the Notes.


8-K


001-04423


4.12


October 13, 2015

10(a)


Registrant's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.*


S-8


333-114253


4.1


April 7, 2004

10(b)


Registrant's 2000 Stock Plan, amended and restated effective September 17, 2008.*


10-K


001-04423


10(b)


December 18, 2008

10(c)


Registrant's Excess Benefit Retirement Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2006.*


8-K


001-04423


10.2


September 21, 2006

10(d)


Hewlett-Packard Company Cash Account Restoration Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2005.*


8-K


001-04423


99.3


November 23, 2005

10(e)


Registrant's 2005 Pay-for-Results Plan, as amended.*


10-K


001-04423


10(h)


December 14, 2011

10(f)


Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


8-K


001-04423


10.1


September 21, 2006

10(g)


First Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(q)


June 8, 2007

10(h)


Registrant's Executive Severance Agreement.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(u)(u)


June 13, 2002

10(i)


Registrant's Executive Officers Severance Agreement.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(v)(v)


June 13, 2002

10(j)


Form letter regarding severance offset for restricted stock and restricted units.*


8-K


001-04423


10.2


March 22, 2005

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
10(k)Second Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*10-K001-0442310(l)(l)December 18, 2007

10(l)


Form of Agreement Regarding Confidential Information and Proprietary Developments (California).*


8-K


001-04423


10.2


January 24, 2008

10(m)


Form of Agreement Regarding Confidential Information and Proprietary Developments (Texas).*


10-Q


001-04423


10(o)(o)


March 10, 2008

10(n)


Form of Stock Option Agreement for Registrant's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(c)(c)


March 10, 2008

10(o)


Form of Option Agreement for Registrant's 2000 Stock Plan.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(t)(t)


June 6, 2008

10(p)


Form of Common Stock Payment Agreement for Registrant's 2000 Stock Plan.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(u)(u)


June 6, 2008

10(q)


Third Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-K


001-04423


10(v)(v)


December 18, 2008

10(r)


Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of non-qualified stock options.*


10-K


001-04423


10(y)(y)


December 18, 2008

10(s)


First Amendment to the Hewlett-Packard Company Excess Benefit Retirement Plan.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(b)(b)(b)


March 10, 2009

10(t)


Fourth Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(c)(c)(c)


June 5, 2009

10(u)


Fifth Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(d)(d)(d)


September 4, 2009

10(v)


Amended and Restated Hewlett-Packard Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.*


8-K


001-04423


10.2


March 23, 2010

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
10(w)Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of non-qualified stock options.*10-K001-0442310(i)(i)(i)December 15, 2010

10(x)


Form of Agreement Regarding Confidential Information and Proprietary Developments (California—new hires).*


10-K


001-04423


10(j)(j)(j)


December 15, 2010

10(y)


Form of Agreement Regarding Confidential Information and Proprietary Developments (California—current employees).*


10-K


001-04423


10(k)(k)(k)


December 15, 2010

10(z)


First Amendment to the Registrant's Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2004.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(o)(o)(o)


September 9, 2011

10(a)(a)


Sixth Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(p)(p)(p)


September 9, 2011

10(b)(b)


Employment offer letter, dated September 27, 2011, between the Registrant and Margaret C. Whitman.*


8-K


001-04423


10.2


September 29, 2011

10(c)(c)


Seventh Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-K


001-04423


10(c)(c)(c)


December 14, 2011

10(d)(d)


Registrant's Severance Plan for Executive Officers, as amended and restated September 18, 2013.*


10-K


001-04423


10(q)(q)


December 30, 2013

10(e)(e)


Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement, dated March 16, 2012, between the Registrant and Margaret C. Whitman.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(h)(h)(h)


June 8, 2012

10(f)(f)


Second Amended and Restated Hewlett-Packard Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended effective February 28, 2013.*


8-K


001-04423


10.2


March 21, 2013

10(g)(g)


Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement, dated April 22, 2013, between the Registrant and John M. Hinshaw.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(t)(t)


June 6, 2013

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
10(h)(h)Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of restricted stock units.*10-Q001-0442310(u)(u)March 11, 2014

10(i)(i)


Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of foreign stock appreciation rights.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(v)(v)


March 11, 2014

10(j)(j)


Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for long-term cash awards.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(w)(w)


March 11, 2014

10(k)(k)


Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of non-qualified stock options.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(x)(x)


March 11, 2014

10(l)(l)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of performance-adjusted restricted stock units.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(y)(y)


March 11, 2014

10(m)(m)


Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of restricted stock.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(z)(z)


March 11, 2014

10(n)(n)


Form of Stock Notification and Award Agreement for awards of performance-contingent non-qualified stock options.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(a)(a)(a)


March 11, 2014

10(o)(o)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of performance-contingent non-qualified stock options.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(b)(b)(b)


March 11, 2014

10(p)(p)


Eighth Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(c)(c)(c)


March 11, 2014

10(q)(q)


Ninth Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(d)(d)(d)


March 11, 2014

10(r)(r)


Tenth Amendment to the Registrant's 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006.*


10-K


001-0442


10(c)(c)(c)


December 17, 2014

10(s)(s)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of restricted stock units.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(c)(c)(c)


March 11, 2015

10(t)(t)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of foreign stock appreciation rights.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(d)(d)(d)


March 11, 2015

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
10(u)(u)Form of Grant Agreement for grants of long-term cash awards.*10-Q001-0442310(c)(c)(c)March 11, 2015

10(v)(v)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of non-qualified stock options.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(f)(f)(f)


March 11, 2015

10(w)(w)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of performance-adjusted restricted stock units.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(g)(g)(g)


March 11, 2015

10(x)(x)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of restricted stock awards.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(h)(h)(h)


March 11, 2015

10(y)(y)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of performance-contingent non-qualified stock options.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(i)(i)(i)


March 11, 2015

10(z)(z)


Registrant's Severance Plan for Executive Officers, as amended and restated November 19, 2014.*


10-Q


001-04423


10(j)(j)(j)


March 11, 2015

10(a)(a)(a)


Voting Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2015, among the Registrant and the listed stockholders of Aruba Networks, Inc.


8-K


001-04423


10.1


March 2, 2015

10(b)(b)(b)


Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2015, among the Registrant, the lenders named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.


10-Q


001-04423


10(b)(b)(b)


June 8, 2015

10(c)(c)(c)


Amendment, dated as of June 1, 2015, to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2015, among the Registrant, the lenders named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.


10-Q


001-04423


10(c)(c)(c)


June 8, 2015

10(d)(d)(d)


Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2014, as Amended and Restated as of November 1, 2015, among the Registrant, the lenders named therein and Citibank, N.A., as administrative processing agent and co-administrative agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-administrative agent.


8-K


001-04423


10.1


November 5, 2015

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
10(e)(e)(e)Form of Grant Agreement for grants of foreign stock appreciation rights.*‡     

10(f)(f)(f)/s/ DION J. WEISLER

 

Form of Grant Agreement for grants of performance-contingent non-qualified stock options.*‡









10(g)(g)(g)


Form of Grant Agreement for grants of non-qualified stock options.*‡









9


None.









11


None.









12


Statements of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.‡









13-14


None.









15


None.









18


None.









21


Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of November 1, 2015.‡









22


None.









23


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.‡









24


Power of Attorney (included on the signature page).









31.1


Certification of
President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.‡









31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.‡









32


Certification of Chief
(Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†








Officer)

Table of Contents



Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit(s)Filing Date
101.INS XBRL Instance Document.‡December 14, 2017
Dion J. Weisler

   
     

101.SCH/s/ CATHERINE A. LESJAK

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.‡
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 







December 14, 2017

101.CALCatherine A. Lesjak

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.‡

 







 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.‡

 







 

101.LAB/s/ MARIE E. MYERS

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.‡
Global Controller and Head of
Finance Services
(Principal Accounting Officer)

 







December 14, 2017

101.PREMarie E. Myers

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.‡

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ AIDA ALVAREZ
DirectorDecember 14, 2017
Aida Alvarez
/s/ SHUMEET BANERJIDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Shumeet Banerji
/s/ ROBERT R. BENNETTDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Robert R. Bennett
/s/ CHARLES V. BERGHDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Charles V. Bergh
/s/ STACY BROWN-PHILPOTDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Stacy Brown-Philpot
/s/ STEPHANIE BURNSDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Stephanie Burns
/s/ MARY ANNE CITRINODirectorDecember 14, 2017
Mary Anne Citrino
/s/ STACEY MOBLEYDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Stacey Mobley
/s/ SUBRA SURESHDirectorDecember 14, 2017
Subra Suresh
 

*
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

**
Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2)
Filed herewith.

Furnished herewith.
contents

        The registrant agrees to furnish to the Commission supplementally upon request a copy of (1) any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed herewith as to which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and (2) any omitted schedules to any material plan of acquisition, disposition or reorganization set forth above.



ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.


130