Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)  

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20152017

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                    to                               

Commission File Number 1-15839

ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 95-4803544
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3100 Ocean Park Boulevard, Santa Monica, CA
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

90405
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(310) 255-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $.000001 per share The NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filerý Accelerated Filero Non-accelerated Filero
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller Reporting Companyo

Emerging Growth Company o

         If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý

         The aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 20152017 (based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQ)Nasdaq) was $13,345,675,247.$42,587,342,045.

         The number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding at February 22, 201620, 2018 was 734,998,115.758,631,663.

         Documents Incorporated by Reference

         Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which is expected to be held on June 2, 2016,26, 2018, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report.

   


Table of Contents


ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Table of Contents

 
  
 Page No.
PART I.  32

 Cautionary Statement 32

Item 1.

 Business 2 

Item 1A.

 Risk Factors 1512

Item 1B.

 Unresolved Staff Comments 4032

Item 2.

 Properties 4032

Item 3.

 Legal Proceedings 4032

Item 4.

 Mine Safety Disclosures 4133
PART II.  4234

Item 5.

 Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 4234

Item 6.

 Selected Financial Data 4537

Item 7.

 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 4638

Item 7A.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 8379

Item 8.

 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 8681

Item 9.

 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 8681

Item 9A.

 Controls and Procedures 8681

Item 9B.

 Other Information 8782
PART III.  8883

Item 10.

 Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 8883

Item 11.

 Executive Compensation 8883

Item 12.

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 8883

Item 13.

 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 8883

Item 14.

 Principal Accounting Fees and Services 8883
PART IV.  8984

Item 15.

 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule 8984
SIGNATURES

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary 9084
Exhibit Index E-1
SIGNATURESE-8

Table of Contents


PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains, or incorporates by reference, certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements consist of any statement other than a recitation of historical facts and include, but are not limited to: (1) projections of revenues, expenses, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, cash flow, or other financial items; (2) statements of our plans and objectives, including those relatingrelated to product releases;releases of products or services; (3) statements of future financial or operating performance; (4) statements relating toperformance, including the acquisition of King Digital Entertainment plc and expected impact of that transaction, including without limitation, the expected impact on Activision Blizzard's future financial results;tax items thereon; and (5)(4) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Activision Blizzard, Inc. generally uses words such as "outlook," "forecast," "will," "could," "should," "would," "to be," "plan," "plans," "believes," "may," "might," "expects," "intends," "intends as," "anticipates," "estimate," "future," "positioned," "potential," "project," "remain," "scheduled," "set to," "subject to," "upcoming" and other similar expressions to help identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks, reflect management's current expectations, estimates and projections about our business, and are inherently uncertain and difficult to predict. Our

The company cautions that a number of important factors could cause Activision Blizzard, Inc.'s actual future results couldand other future circumstances to differ materially from expectations statedthose expressed in any forward-looking statements. Some of the risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those stated in forward-looking statements can be found in "Risk Factors" included in Part I, Item 1A of this Report.Annual Report on Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based upon information available to us as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although these forward-looking statements are believed to be true when made, they may ultimately prove to be incorrect. These statements are not guarantees of our future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.

        Activision Blizzard Inc.'s names, abbreviations thereof, logos, and product and service designators are all either the registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names of Activision Blizzard. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. All dollar amounts referred to in, or contemplated by, this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to United States ("U.S.") dollars, unless otherwise explicitly stated to the contrary.

Item 1.    BUSINESS

Overview

        Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a worldwideleading global developer and publisher of online,interactive entertainment content and services. We develop and distribute content and services on video game consoles, personal computercomputers ("PC"), video game console, handheld,and mobile devices. We also operate esports events and tabletleagues and create film and television content based on our games. The terms "Activision Blizzard," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" are used to refer collectively to Activision Blizzard, Inc. and its subsidiaries. We currently offer games that operate on

        The Company was originally incorporated in California in 1979 and was reincorporated in Delaware in December 1992. In connection with the Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"2008 business combination (the "Business Combination") Xbox One ("Xbox One")by and Xbox 360 ("Xbox 360"among the Company (then known as Activision, Inc.), Nintendo Co. Ltd.Vivendi S.A. ("Nintendo") Wii U ("Wii U") and Wii ("Wii"Vivendi"), and Sony ComputerVivendi Games, Inc. ("Vivendi Games"), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi, we were renamed Activision Blizzard, Inc.

        The common stock of Activision Blizzard is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the ticker symbol "ATVI."


Table of Contents

The King Acquisition

        On February 23, 2016 (the "King Closing Date"), we acquired King Digital Entertainment, a leading interactive mobile entertainment company ("King"), by purchasing all of its outstanding shares (the "King Acquisition"). We made this acquisition because we believed that the addition of King's highly complementary mobile business positioned us as a global leader in interactive entertainment across mobile, console, and PC platforms, and aligned us for future growth. The aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion was funded with $3.6 billion of existing cash and $2.2 billion of cash from new debt issued by the Company. King's results of operations since the King Closing Date are included in our consolidated financial statements.

Our Strategy and Vision

        Our objective is to continue to be a worldwide leader in the development, publishing, and distribution of high-quality interactive entertainment content and services, as well as related media, that deliver engaging entertainment experiences on a year-round basis. In pursuit of this objective we focus on three strategic pillars: expanding audience reach; driving deep consumer engagement; and providing more opportunities for player investment.

        Expanding audience reach.    Building on our strong established franchises and creating new franchises through compelling new content is at the core of our business. We endeavor to reach as many consumers as possible either through: (1) the purchase of our content and services; (2) engagement in our free-to-play games, which allow consumers to play games with no up-front cost but provide for player investment through sales of downloadable content or via microtransactions; or (3) engagement in other types of media based on our franchises, such as esports and film and television content.

        Driving deep consumer engagement.    Our high-quality entertainment content not only expands our audience reach, but it also drives deep engagement with our franchises. We design our games, as well as related media, to provide a depth of content that keeps consumers engaged for a long period of time following a game's release, delivering more value to our players and additional growth opportunities for our franchises.

        Providing more opportunities for player investment.    Increasingly, our consumers are connected to our games online through consoles, PCs, and mobile devices. This allows us to offer additional digital player investment opportunities directly to our consumers on a year-round basis. In addition to purchasing full games or subscriptions, players can invest in certain of our games and franchises by purchasing incremental "in-game" content (including larger downloadable content or smaller content, via microtransactions). These digital revenue streams tend to be recurring and have relatively higher profit margins. Further, if executed properly, additional player investment can increase engagement as it provides more frequent and incremental content for our players. In addition, we believe there is an opportunity for advertising within certain of our franchises, as well as opportunities to drive new forms of player investment through esports, film and television, and consumer products. We are in the early stages of developing these new revenue streams.

        Our strategy is ultimately aimed at creating shareholder value and enhancing returns. We strive to increase profitability, cash flows, and return on capital—and to do so while keeping our company a great place to work for our employees.

Reportable Segments

        As part of the continued implementation of our esports strategy, we instituted changes to our internal organization and reporting structure such that the Major League Gaming ("MLG") business now operates as a division of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. ("Sony"Blizzard") PlayStation 4 ("PS4"). As such, commencing with the


Table of Contents

second quarter of 2017, MLG, which was previously a separate operating segment, is now a component of the Blizzard operating segment. MLG is responsible for the operations of the Overwatch League™, along with other esports events, and PlayStation 3 ("PS3") console systems (Xbox One, Wii U, and PS4 are collectively referredwill also continue to serve as "next-generation"; Xbox 360, Wii, and PS3 are collectively referred toa multi-platform network for other Activision Blizzard esports content.

        Based upon our organizational structure, we conduct our business through three reportable segments as "prior-generation"); the PC; the Nintendo 3DS, Nintendo Dual Screen and Sony PlayStation Vita handheld game systems; and mobile and tablet devices.follows:

(i)    Activision Publishing, Inc.—Through

        Activision Publishing, Inc. ("Activision"), we areis a leading internationalglobal developer and publisher of interactive software products and content.entertainment content, particularly for the console platform. Activision primarily delivers content through retail and digital channels, including full-game and in-game sales, as well as by licensing software to third-party or related-party companies that distribute Activision products. Activision develops, markets, and sells products through retail channels or digital downloads, which are principally based on our internally developed intellectual properties, as well as some licensed properties. ActivisionWe have also established a long-term alliance with Bungie to publish its game universe, Destiny.

        Activision's key product franchises include: Call of Duty®, a first-person shooter for the console and PC platforms, and Destiny, an online universe of first-person action gameplay (which we call a "shared-world shooter") for the console and PC platforms. Call of Duty, Activision's leading franchise, has been the number one console franchise globally for eight of the last nine years, based on data from The NPD Group, GfK Chart-Track, and GSD, and our internal estimates.

(ii)   Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.

        Blizzard is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive software products and entertainment content, particularly for the PC platform. Blizzard primarily delivers content through retail and digital channels, including subscriptions, full-game, and in-game sales, as well as by licensing software to third-party or related-party companies that distribute Blizzard products. Blizzard also maintains a broad rangeproprietary online gaming service, Blizzard Battle.net®, which facilitates digital distribution of gamers, ranging from childrenBlizzard content, along with Activision'sDestiny 2 PC content, online social connectivity, and the creation of user-generated content. As noted above, Blizzard also includes the activities of our MLG business, which is responsible for the operations of the Overwatch League, along with other esports events, and will also continue to adults,serve as a multi-platform network for other Activision Blizzard esports content.

        Blizzard's key product franchises include: World of Warcraft®, a subscription-based massive multi-player online role-playing game ("MMORPG") for PC; StarCraft®, a real-time strategy PC franchise; Diablo®, an action role-playing franchise for the PC and from core gamers to mass-market consumers to "value" buyers seeking budget-priced software,console platforms; Hearthstone®, an online collectible card franchise for the PC and mobile platforms; Heroes of the Storm®, a free-to-play team brawler for PC; and Overwatch®, a team-based first-person shooter for the PC and console platforms. World of Warcraft, which was initially launched in a variety of geographies. Activision continues to focus its effortsNovember 2004, is the leading subscription-based MMORPG in the areas we believe haveworld.

(iii)  King Digital Entertainment

        King is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment content and services, particularly on mobile platforms, such as Google Inc.'s ("Google") Android and Apple Inc.'s ("Apple") iOS. King also distributes its content and services on the most opportunity for growth and higher profitability, while reducing investments in areas we believe have less profit potential andPC platform, primarily via Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook"). King's games are free to play, however, players can acquire in-game items, either with virtual currency the players purchase or directly using real currency.


Table of Contents

limited growth opportunities. To that end, investments        King's key product franchises, all of which are focused on proven intellectual properties to develop deep, high-quality content that offers engaging online gaming experiences. One of Activision's leading franchises is Call of Duty®for the mobile and PC platforms, include: Candy Crush™, which launched in 2003,features "match three" games; Farm Heroes™, which also features "match three" games; and has beenBubble Witch™, which features "bubble shooter" games. King had two of the best-selling Western interactive franchise since its launch. In 2015, Activision released the latest installmenttop 10 highest-grossing titles in the franchise,Call of Duty: Black Ops III, which,U.S. mobile app stores for the last 17 quarters in a row, according to The NPD Group, GfK Chart-Track,App Annie Intelligence and Activision Blizzard internal estimates was the #1 best-selling console game globally in 2015. Activision is currently developing, distributing, and selling additional digital content for the global community ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III players, along with content forApple App Store and the other Call of Duty titles, in addition to developing future releases and sequels.

        Another leading franchise for Activision is Skylanders®, which launched in 2011 with the release ofSkylanders Spyro's Adventure. Games in the Skylanders franchise combine the use of physical toys with digital interactive experiences to deliver innovative gameplay to our audience. In September 2015, we releasedSkylanders SuperChargers, which introduced vehicles-to-life—an entirely new way for fans to experience the magic of Skylanders.

        While focusing on proven intellectual properties is one of Activision's priorities, we also continue to make strategic investments in developing new intellectual properties that we believe have the potential for long-term growth and success. For example, on September 15, 2015, we releasedThe Taken King, the third and largest expansion toDestiny, the game universe created by Bungie under our long-term alliance with them. We also introduced microtransactions withinDestiny in October 2015 and expect to release additional content to our global community of Destiny players in 2016.Google Play Store combined.

        BlizzardOther—Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. ("Blizzard") is a leader in online PC gaming, including the subscription-based massively multi-player online role-playing game ("MMORPG") category in terms of both subscriber base and revenues generated through its World of Warcraft® franchise. Blizzard also develops, markets, and sells role-playing action and strategy games for the PC, console, mobile and tablet platforms, including games in the multiple-award winning Diablo®, StarCraft®, Hearthstone®: Heroes of Warcraft™ and Heroes of the Storm™ franchises. In addition, Blizzard maintains a proprietary online gaming service, Battle.net®, which facilitates the creation of user-generated content, digital distribution and online social connectivity across all Blizzard games. Blizzard distributes its products and generates revenues worldwide through various means, including: subscriptions; sales of prepaid subscription cards; in-game purchases and services; retail sales of physical "boxed" products; online download sales of PC products; purchases and downloads via third-party console, mobile and tablet platforms; and licensing of software to third-party or related party companies that distribute Blizzard products.

        Blizzard has released five expansion packs to the epic World of Warcraft franchise since 2004, with the most recent release,World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor®, having been released in November 2014, and the next expansion,World of Warcraft: Legion™, to be released in the summer of 2016. ForHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, in addition to bringing the game to iOS and Android smartphones in April 2015, three new content releases,Blackrock Mountain, The Grand Tournament™, andThe League of Explorers™, were introduced in 2015 and have continued to drive performance.

        Blizzard continues to invest in new opportunities, both by leveraging its internally developed intellectual property, such as the release ofHeroes of the Storm in 2015, as well as developing new intellectual property with the upcoming team-based first person shooter,Overwatch™, which is expected to be released commercially in the spring of 2016.

        OtherWe also engage in other business opportunitiesbusinesses that do not represent reportable segments, including:


Table of Contents

        Revenues associatedProducts

        We develop interactive entertainment content and services, principally for console, PC, and mobile devices, and we market and sell our games through retail and digital distribution channels. Our products span various genres, including first-person shooter, action/adventure, role-playing, strategy, and "match three," among others. We primarily offer the following products and services:

        Providing additional opportunities for player investment outside of full-game purchases has allowed us to shift from our historical seasonality to a more consistently recurring and Destiny franchises combined accountedyear-round revenue model. In addition, if executed properly, it allows us to increase player engagement as it provides more frequent and incremental content for 71%, 72%,our players.

Product Development and 80% of our consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

The Business Combination and Share RepurchaseSupport

        Activision, Inc. was originally incorporated in California in 1979We focus on developing enduring franchises backed by well-designed, high-quality games with regular content updates. We build interactive entertainment content with the potential for broad reach, sustainable engagement and was reincorporated in Delaware in December 1992.

        Activision Blizzardyear-round player investment. It is our experience that enduring franchises then serve as the resultbasis for sequels, prequels and related new products and content that can be released over an extended period of time. We believe that the 2008 business combination ("Business Combination") bydevelopment and amongdistribution of products and content based on proven franchises enhances predictability of revenues and the Company (then known as Activision, Inc.), Sego Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiaryprobability of Activision, Inc., Vivendi S.A. ("Vivendi"), VGAC LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiaryhigh unit volume sales and operating profits. We intend to continue development of Vivendi, and Vivendi Games, Inc. ("Vivendi Games"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of VGAC LLC. As a result of the consummation of the Business Combination, Activision, Inc. was renamed Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Vivendi became a majority shareholder of Activision Blizzard. Activision Blizzard is a public company traded on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol "ATVI."

        On October 11, 2013, we repurchased approximately 429 million shares of our common stock, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") we entered into with Vivendi and ASAC II LP ("ASAC"), an exempted limited partnership established under the laws of the Cayman Islands, acting by its general partner, ASAC II LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, we acquired all of the capital stock of Amber Holding Subsidiary Co., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi ("New VH"), which was the direct owner of approximately 429 million shares of our common stock, for a cash payment of $5.83 billion, or $13.60 per share, before taking into account the benefit to the Company of certain tax attributes of New VH assumedowned franchises in the transaction (collectively, the "Purchase Transaction"). Refer to Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the financing of the Purchase Transaction.

        Immediately following the completion of the Purchase Transaction, ASAC purchased from Vivendi 172 million shares of our common stock, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, for a cash payment of $2.34 billion, or $13.60 per share (the "Private Sale"). Robert A. Kotick, our Chief Executive Officer, and Brian G. Kelly, Chairman of our Board of Directors, are affiliates of ASAC II LLC.

        On May 28, 2014, Vivendi sold approximately 41 million shares, or approximately 50% of its then-current holdings, of our common stock in a registered public offering. Vivendi received proceeds of approximately $850 million from that sale; we did not receive any proceeds.

        As of December 31, 2015, we had 734 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding. At that date, (i) Vivendi held 41 million shares, or approximately 6% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) ASAC held 172 million shares, or approximately 23% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and (iii) our other stockholders held approximately 71% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.future.


Table of Contents

        On January 13, 2016, Vivendi soldWe develop and produce our titles using a model in which a group of creative, technical, and production professionals, including designers, producers, programmers, artists, and sound engineers, in coordination with our marketing, finance, analytics, sales, and other professionals, has responsibility for the entire development and production process, including the supervision and coordination of internal and, where appropriate, external resources. We believe this model allows us to deploy the best resources for a given task, by supplementing our internal expertise with top-quality external resources on an as-needed basis.

        While most of the content for our franchises is developed by internal studios, we periodically engage independent third-party developers to create content on our behalf. From time to time, we also acquire the license rights to publish and/or distribute software products that are, or will be, independently created by third-party developers. Since 2010, Activision has been in a long-term exclusive relationship with Bungie, the developer of game franchises including Halo, Myth, and Marathon, to publish games in the Destiny franchise. During the term of the agreement, Activision has exclusive, worldwide rights to publish and distribute on multiple platforms all future Bungie games based on Destiny.

        We provide various forms of their remaining sharesproduct support. Central technology and development teams review, assess, and provide support to products throughout the development process. Quality assurance personnel are also involved throughout the development and production of published content. We subject all such content to extensive testing before public release to ensure compatibility with appropriate hardware systems and configurations and to minimize the number of bugs and other defects found in the products. To support our content, we generally provide 24-hour game support to players through various means, primarily online and by telephone.

Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

        Many of our common stock. We did notproducts contain software that enables us to connect with our gamers directly. This provides a significant marketing tool that allows us to communicate and market directly to our customers, including through customized advertising and in-game messaging based on customer preferences and trends. Our marketing efforts also include activities on Facebook, Twitter, Twitch, YouTube and other online social networks, other online advertising, other public relations activity, print and broadcast advertising, coordinated in-store and industry promotions (including merchandising and point of purchase displays), participation in cooperative advertising programs, direct response vehicles, and product sampling through demonstration software distributed through the Internet or the digital online services provided by our partners. From time to time, we also receive any proceedsmarketing support from the sale.

The King Acquisition

        On November 2, 2015, wehardware manufacturers, producers of consumer products related to a game, and King Digital Entertainment plc, a leading interactive entertainment company for the mobile world incorporated under the laws of Ireland ("King"), entered into a Transaction Agreement (the "Transaction Agreement") under the terms of which we would acquire King (the "King Acquisition") and King would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. On February 23, 2016 we completed the King Acquisition under the terms of the Transaction Agreement. We transferred $5.9 billionretailers in consideration to the existing King shareholders and share-based award holders.

        The Company made this acquisition because it believes that the addition of King's highly-complementary mobile business will position the Companyconnection with their own promotional efforts, as a global leader in interactive entertainment across mobile, console and PC platforms, and positions the company for future growth. The combined company has a world-class interactive entertainment portfolio of top-performing franchises.

        As the closing of the King Acquisition occurred subsequent to December 31, 2015, our financial resultswell as of, and for the year ended December 31, 2015, do not contain the results of King.

Our Strategyco-marketing from promotional partners.

        Our objective isphysical products are available for sale in outlets around the world. These products are sold primarily on a direct basis to continue to be a worldwide leader in the development, publishing,mass-market retailers (e.g., Target, Wal-Mart), consumer electronics stores (e.g., Best Buy), discount warehouses, game specialty stores (e.g., GameStop), and other stores (e.g., Amazon) or through third-party distribution of high-quality interactive entertainment software, online content and services that deliver year-round, highly satisfying and engaging entertainment experiences.licensing arrangements.

        Continue to Improve Profitability.    We continually strive to manage risk and increase our operating efficiency with the goal of increased profitability. We believe the key factors affecting our future profitability will be the success of proven franchises and genres, cost discipline, and our ability to benefit from the continued growth of online and digital revenue opportunities.

        Create Shareholder Value.    We continue to focus on enhancing shareholder returns through profitable operations and strong cash flows. As a result, we expect to continue to achieve long-term growth and to deliver returns to our shareholders.

        Grow Through Continued Strategic Acquisitions and Alliances.    We intend to continue to evaluate the expansion of our resources, the geographic reach        Most of our products and content are also available in a digital format, which allows consumers to purchase and download the content at their convenience directly to their console, PC, or mobile device through our intellectual properties library through acquisitions, strategic relationships,platform partners, including Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"), Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. ("Sony"), Apple, Google, Nintendo Co., Ltd. ("Nintendo"), and key licensing transactions. We will also continueFacebook. Blizzard utilizes its proprietary online gaming service, Blizzard Battle.net, to invest in, and build on, existing alliances and relationships.distribute most of Blizzard's content directly to PC consumers.

        In addition we will continue to evaluate opportunitiesserving as a distribution platform, Blizzard Battle.net offers players communications features, social networking, player matching and digital content delivery and is designed to increase our proven development expertise through the acquisition of, or investment in, selected experienced software development firms.

        Focus on Delivery of Digital Content and Online Services.    We continue to shift towards digital delivery of content and to establish and develop direct and long-term relationships with our gamers. We will also continue to support, maintain and enhance the online communities for our games and franchises. We believe that focusing our efforts on online product innovations, such as additional online content, services and social connectivity, provides lasting value to our global communities of players. In addition, we continue to expand into new business models for the digital delivery of content, including offering free-to-play games with monetization through in-game microtransactions along with increased in-game microtransactions within our purchased software products. We are also focused on increasing our presence on new digital platforms, such as mobile and tablet devices.allow people


Table of Contents

        Extend the Reachto connect regardless of which of our Existing Franchises.games on Blizzard Battle.net they are playing. It attracts millions of active players, making it one of the largest online game-related services in the world.

Manufacturing

        We prepare master program copies for our products on each release platform. With respect to products for Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo consoles, our disk duplication, packaging, printing, manufacturing, warehousing, assembly and shipping are performed by third-party subcontractors or distribution facilities owned by us.

        Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo generally specify or control the manufacturing and assembly of finished products and license their hardware technologies to us for which we pay an applicable royalty per unit once the manufacturer fills the product order, even if the units do not ultimately sell. We deliver the master materials to the licensor or its approved replicator, who then manufactures the finished goods and delivers them to us for distribution under our label.

Significant Customers and Top Franchises

Customers    We are focused on identifying

        While the Company does sell directly to end consumers in certain instances, such as sales through Blizzard's proprietary online gaming service platform, Blizzard Battle.net, in other instances our customers may be platform providers, such as Sony, Microsoft, Google, and investing in business opportunities that extend our existing franchises into adjacent entertainment verticals, deepen audience engagement by celebrating our players, deliver high production values to our communities,Apple, or retailers, such as Wal-Mart and provide greater opportunities for player investment. This includes investments in our Media Networks and Studios businesses. Our Media Networks business acquired Major League Gaming Inc. ("MLG") which provides an immediate expansionGameStop, who act as distributors of our reach acrosscontent to end consumers. For the rapidly-growing eSports ecosystem by adding proven live streaming capabilitiesyear ended December 31, 2017, we had three customers—Apple, Sony, and technologies. Competitive gamingGoogle—who accounted for 16%, 14%, and 10%, respectively, of net revenues. For the spectator opportunities connected to organized gaming competitions could provide opportunitiesyear ended December 31, 2016, we had two customers—Sony and Apple—who each accounted for shareholders13% of net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had two customers—Sony and great rewardsMicrosoft—who accounted for 12% and recognition10%, respectively, of net revenues.

        We had three customers—Sony, Microsoft, and Apple—who accounted for 17%, 14%, and 10%, respectively, of consolidated gross receivables at December 31, 2017. We had three customers—Sony, Microsoft, and Wal-Mart—who accounted for 17%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, of consolidated gross receivables at December 31, 2016.

Top Franchises

        For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, our hundreds of millions of players. Our Studios business is focused on producing an animated Skylanders television series which we expect to release in the fall of 2016 and has begun work on developing a robust cinematic universe based on the top four franchises—Call of Duty, franchise.Candy Crush, World of Warcraft, and Overwatch—collectively accounted for 66% and 69% of our net revenues, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our top four franchises—Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, Destiny, and Hearthstone—collectively accounted for 75% of our net revenues.

Competition

        We compete for the leisure time and discretionary spending of consumers with other interactive entertainment companies, as well as with providers of different forms of entertainment, such as motion pictures,film, television, social networking, online casual entertainment, music and other consumer products.

        The interactive entertainment industry is intensely competitive and new interactive entertainment software products and platforms are regularly introduced. Our competitors vary in size from small companies with limited resources to large corporations who may have greater financial, marketing, and product development resources than we have. Due to their different focuses and allocation of resources, certain of our competitors may spend more money and time on developing and testing products, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, pay higher fees for licenses, and pay more to third-party software developers than we do. In addition, competitors with large product lines and popular titles typically have greater leverage with retailers, distributors, and other customers who may be willing to promote titles with less consumer appeal in return for access to such competitor's most popular titles. We believe that the main competitive factors in the interactive entertainment industry include: product features, game quality, and playability; brand name recognition; compatibility of products with popular platforms; access to distribution channels; online capability and functionality; ease of use; price; marketing support; and quality of customer service.


Table of Contents

        We compete primarily with other publishers of PC, online, mobile, and video game console, PC, and mobile interactive entertainment software. In addition to third-party software competitors, integrated video game console hardware and software companies, such as Microsoft, Nintendo,Sony, and Sony,Nintendo, compete directly with us in the development of software titles for their respective platforms. A number of software publishers have developed and commercialized, or are currently developing, online games for use by consumers over the Internet. Further, we compete with publishers of mobile games, who may be narrowly focused on publishing games for mobile and tablet devices. Lastly, with our Skylanders franchise and its toys and accessories, we compete indirectly with companies who sell toys to our target consumers for this franchise. We expect new competitors to continue to emerge in the "toys to life", MMORPG, free-to-play and other microtransaction-based game categories. Notably in 2015, the toys to life category became more competitive with a new entrant competing directly with us and other incumbents.consumers.

Employees

        At December 31, 2015, we had approximately 7,300 total full-time and part-time employees. At December 31, 2015, approximately 110 of our full-time employees were subject to fixed-term employment agreements with us. These agreements generally commit the employee and the Company to employment terms of between one and five years from the commencement of the agreement. Most


Table of Contents

of our employees who are subject to these agreements are executive officers or key members of the product development, sales, or marketing divisions. These individuals perform services for us as executives, directors, producers, associate producers, computer programmers, game designers, sales directors, or marketing product managers. In our experience, entering into employment agreements with these employees reduces our turnover during the development, production and distribution phases of our entertainment software products and allows us to plan more effectively for future development and marketing activities. Some employees outside of the United States ("U.S.") are also party to employment agreements that do not specify a fixed term.

        The majority of our employees in France, Germany, Spain, and Italy are subject to collective agreements as a part of normal business practices in those countries. In addition, certain employees in those countries are subject to collective bargaining agreements. To date, we have not experienced any labor-related work stoppages.

Intellectual Property

        Like other interactive entertainment companies, our business is significantly dependent on the creation, acquisition, use and protection of intellectual property. Some of this intellectual property is in the form of copyrighted software code, patented technology, and other technology and trade secrets that we use to develop and run our games and to make them run properly.games. Other intellectual property is in the form of copyrighted audio-visual elements that consumers can see, hear and interact with when they are playing our games.

        We develop somea majority of our products frombased on wholly-owned intellectual properties, that we create within our own studios. We also acquire the rights to include proprietary intellectual property in our products through acquisitions.such as Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, and Candy Crush, among others. In addition,other cases, we obtain intellectual property through licenses and service agreements. These agreements, typically limitsuch as for our use of the licensed rights in products for specific time periods. In addition,Destiny franchise. Further, our products that play on game consoles as well as handheld,and mobile and tablet platforms include technology that is owned by the console or wireless device manufacturer,platform provider and is licensed non-exclusively to us for use.use in the relevant product. We also license technology from providers other than console manufacturers.manufacturers in developing our content and services. While we may have renewal rights for some licenses, our business is dependent on our ability to continue to obtain the intellectual property rights from the owners of these rights on reasonable terms and at reasonable rates.

        We actively engage in enforcement and other activities to protect our intellectual property. We typically own the copyright to the software code in our products. Moreover, we own or license the brand or title name trademark under which our products are marketed. We register copyrights, trademarks and patents in the U.S. and in other countries as appropriate.

        We often distribute our PC products using copy protection technology or other technological protection measures to prevent piracy and the use of unauthorized copies of our products. In addition, console manufacturers typically incorporate technological protections and other security measures in their consoles in an effort to prevent the use of unlicensed products. We are actively engaged in enforcement of our copyright, trademark, patent, and trade secret rights against potential infringers of those rights along with other protective activities, to protect against unauthorized copying and piracy, including monitoring online channels for distribution of pirated copies and participating in various enforcement initiatives, education programs and legislative activity around the world. For our PC products, we use technological protection measures to prevent piracy and the use of unauthorized copies of our products. For other platforms, the platform providers typically incorporate technological protections and other security measures in their platforms to prevent the use of unlicensed products on those platforms.

Significant CustomersExecutive Officers

        Our executive officers and their biographical summaries are provided below:

Name
AgePosition

Robert A. Kotick

54Chief Executive Officer of Activision Blizzard

Collister Johnson

41President and Chief Operating Officer of Activision Blizzard

Dennis Durkin

47Chief Corporate Officer of Activision Blizzard

Spencer Neumann

48Chief Financial Officer of Activision Blizzard

Eric Hirshberg

49President and Chief Executive Officer of Activision

Michael Morhaime

50President and Chief Executive Officer of Blizzard

Brian Stolz

42Chief People Officer of Activision Blizzard

Christopher Walther

51Chief Legal Officer of Activision Blizzard

Riccardo Zacconi

50Chief Executive Officer of King

Robert A. Kotick, Chief Executive Officer of Activision Blizzard

        We had two customers, SonyRobert A. Kotick has been a director of Activision Blizzard since February 1991, following his purchase of a significant interest in the Company, which was then on the verge of insolvency. Mr. Kotick was our Chairman and Microsoft, who accounted for 12% and 10% of our consolidated net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively. We did not have any single customer that accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013. We had three customers, Sony, Microsoft, and Wal-Mart, who accounted for 18%, 13%,Chief Executive Officer from February 1991 until July 2008, when


Table of Contents

he became our President and 11%Chief Executive Officer in connection with the Business Combination. Mr Kotick served as our President from July 2008 until June 2017, when Mr. Johnson began serving as our President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Kotick remains the Chief Executive Officer of consolidated gross receivables at December 31, 2015, respectively, and 13%, 17%, and 11% of consolidated gross receivables at December 31, 2014, respectively.

Reportable Segments

        We have two reportable operating segments: (i) Activision Publishing, Inc. and its subsidiaries—publishing interactive entertainment software products and downloadable content, and (ii) Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries—publishing real-time strategy games, role-playing games and online subscription-based games in the MMORPG category. Previously, we reported "Distribution" asBlizzard. Mr. Kotick is also a reportable segment. In the current period, this was no longer deemed a separate reportable segment and is included in "Other" along with our recently announced Media Networks and Studios businesses.

        See Note 13member of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for certain additional information regarding operating segments and geographical performance.

Activision—Business Overview

Strategy

        Create, Acquire and Maintain Strong Franchises.    Activision focuses on development and publishing activities, principally for products and content that are, or have the potential to become, franchises with sustainable mass consumer appeal and recognition and year-round engagement. It is our experience that these products and content can then serve as the basis for sequels, prequels and related new products and content that can be released over an extended periodboard of time. We believe that the publishing and distributiondirectors of products and content based on proven franchises enhances predictability of revenuesThe Coca-Cola Company, a multinational beverage corporation, and the probabilityboards of high unit volume salestrustees for The Center for Early Education and operating profits. Our successful intellectual properties includethe Harvard-Westlake School. He is also vice chairman of the board and chairman of the committee of trustees of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. In addition, Mr. Kotick is the founder and co-chairman of the Call of Duty Endowment, a nonprofit, public benefit corporation that seeks to help organizations that provide job placement and Skylanders franchises,training services for veterans.

Collister Johnson, President and we intendChief Operating Officer of Activision Blizzard

        Collister "Coddy" Johnson has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since June 2017. Prior to continuethat, he served as the chief operating officer and co-founder of Altschool, a public benefit, education technology company, from April 2016 until May 2017. Prior to joining Altschool, he held a number of positions of increasing responsibility at the Company from 2008 to 2016, serving as the chief financial officer and head of operations of Activision, one of our principal operating units, chief operating officer of Activision studios, and senior vice president and chief of staff to our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Johnson holds a B.A. degree in ethics, politics and economics from Yale University and an M.B.A. degree from Stanford University.

Dennis Durkin, Chief Corporate Officer of Activision Blizzard

        Dennis Durkin became our Chief Corporate Officer in June 2017. Prior to this, Mr. Durkin served as our Chief Financial Officer since joining the Company in March 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Durkin held a number of positions of increasing responsibility at Microsoft Corporation, a computing hardware and software manufacturer, most recently serving as the corporate vice president and chief operating and financial officer of Microsoft Corporation's interactive entertainment business, which included the Xbox console business. Prior to joining Microsoft Corporation's interactive entertainment business in 2006, Mr. Durkin worked on Microsoft Corporation's corporate development and strategy team, including two years where he was based in London, England, driving pan-European activity. Before joining Microsoft Corporation, Mr. Durkin was a financial analyst at Alex. Brown and Company. Mr. Durkin holds a B.A. degree in government from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard University.

Spencer Neumann, Chief Financial Officer of owned franchisesActivision Blizzard

        Spencer Neumann has served as our Chief Financial Officer since May 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Neumann held a number of positions of increasing responsibility at The Walt Disney Company, most recently serving as the chief financial officer and executive vice president of Global Guest Experience of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, from 2012 until May 2017. From 2005 to 2012, Mr.��Neumann worked at the private equity firms of Providence Equity Partners and Summit Partners. Prior to that, Mr. Neumann held several other roles with Disney, which he initially joined in the future. We also have an exclusive long-term alliance with Bungie, the developer1992, including executive vice president of the successful Destiny franchise.ABC Television Network from 2001 to 2004 and chief financial officer of the Walt Disney Internet Group from 1999 to 2001. He is also a member of the national board of directors of Make-A-Wish America. Mr. Neumann holds a B.A. degree in economics from Harvard University and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard University.

        Execute Disciplined Product SelectionEric Hirshberg, President and Development Processes.    The successChief Executive Officer of our publishing business depends, in significant part, on our ability to develop high-quality content that will generate significant demand among our global communities. Our publishing units have implemented a formal control process for the selection, development, production and quality assurance of that content. We apply this process, which we refer to as the "Greenlight Process," to all of our products and content, whether they are externally or internally developed. The Greenlight Process includes regular in-depth reviews at important stages of development by a team that includes many of our highest-ranking operating managers and enables coordination among our sales, marketing and development staff at each step in the process.

        We develop our content and products using a combination of our internal development resources and external development resources acting under contract with us. We typically select our external developers based on their track records and expertise in producing products in the same category. One developer will often produce the same game for multiple platforms and will produce sequels to the original game. We believe that selecting and using development resources in this manner allows us to leverage the particular expertise of our internal and external development resources, which we believe enhances the quality of our products and accelerates the timing of releases.

        Focused Content and Product Offerings, Diversity in Platforms and Geographies.    We believe Activision has aligned its product offerings and cost structure to position the business for long-term growth. Through our online-enabled products and content, we believe we are best positioned to take advantage of retail and digital distribution channels that allow us to deliver content to a broad range of gamers, ranging from children to adults and from core gamers to mass-market consumers and to "value" buyers seeking budget-priced software, in a variety of geographies. Presently, the majority of products that we develop, publish and distribute operate on the PS4, PS3, Xbox One, Xbox 360, Wii U, and Wii console systems, and the PC.


Table of Contents

Products

        In recent years, Activision has been best known for its success in the first-person action category from its internally-developed intellectual property, Call of Duty. Our latest release,Call of Duty: Black Ops III, was released on November 6, 2015, and was the #1 best-selling console game globally for 2015, according to The NPD Group, GfK Chart-Track, and our internal estimates.

        On September 20, 2015, Activision launchedSkylanders SuperChargers, the fifth title in our Skylanders franchise, an internally-developed intellectual property that combines the use of physical toys with video games to deliver innovative gameplay experiences to our audience. Specifically, the games in the Skylanders franchise involve "smart toys" consisting of action figures and accessories and an electronic "portal" which, when used with a figure or accessory, allows a player to store and access information about his or her performance in the game. We sell the toys and accessories both bundled with the software for the titles and on a stand-alone basis.Skylanders SuperChargers continues with the innovative "toys to life" concept with the new "vehicles to life" concept which includes online multiplayer and racing gameplay.

        On September 9, 2014, Activision released Bungie'sDestiny, an online universe of first-person action gameplay which we have called the world's first "shared-world shooter". On May 19, 2015, Activision releasedHouse of Wolves, the second expansion toDestiny, and on September 15, 2015, Activision releasedThe Taken King, the third and largest expansion toDestiny.

        Eric Hirshberg became the President and Chief Executive Officer of Activision also develops products spanning other genres, including first-person action, action/adventure, role-playing, simulationin September 2010. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hirshberg served in positions of increasing responsibility with Deutsch LA, a marketing and strategy.

Product Developmentadvertising agency, most recently serving as its co-chief executive officer and Support

        Activision develops and produces titles using a model in which a core group of creative, production and technical professionals, in coordination with our marketing, finance and other departments, has responsibility for the entire development and production process, including the supervision and coordination of internal and external resources. This team assembles the necessary creative elements to complete and release content through, where appropriate, outside programmers, artists, animators, scriptwriters, musicians and songwriters, sound effects and special effects experts, and sound and video studios.

        Activision believes that this model allows us to supplement internal expertise with top-quality external resources on an as-needed basis.

        In addition, Activision periodically engages independent third-party developers to create content on Activision's behalf. We may either own or have rights to commercially exploit these products. In other circumstances, a third-party developer may retain ownership of the intellectual property and/or technology included in the product, or reserve certain exploitation rights with respect thereto. Activision typically selects these independent third-party developers based on their expertise in developing products in a specific category for specific platforms. Each of our third-party developers is under contract with us, either for a single or multiple titles. From time to time, Activision also acquires the license rights to publish and/or distribute software products that are, or will be, independently created by third-party developers. In such cases, the agreements with these developers typically provide us with exclusive publishing and/or distribution rights for a specific period of time, often for specified platforms and territories. In either case, Activision often has the ability to publish and/or distribute sequels, conversions, enhancements, and add-ons to the product initially being produced by the independent developer and Activision frequently has the right to engage the services of the original developer with regard to further product development.

        In consideration for the services that external third-party developers provide, the developers can sometimes receive a royalty, which is generally based on net sales or operating income of the developed products. Typically, developers also receive an advance, which Activision recoups from the royaltiesits chief


Table of Contents

otherwise payablecreative officer. Prior to working at Deutsch LA, Mr. Hirshberg worked at Fattal & Collins, a marketing and advertising agency. Mr. Hirshberg holds a B.F.A. degree from the developers. The advance generally is paidUniversity of California at Los Angeles.

Michael Morhaime, President and Chief Executive Officer of Blizzard

        Michael Morhaime became Chief Executive Officer of Blizzard and an executive officer of Activision Blizzard in "milestone" stages. The payment at each stage is tied to the completion and delivery of a detailed performance milestone. Working with external developers allows us to reduce our fixed development costs, share development risks with the third-party developers, take advantage of the third-party developers' expertiseJuly 2008 in connection with certain categoriesthe Business Combination. Mr. Morhaime co-founded Blizzard in February 1991, and transitioned to the role of products or certain platforms, and gain access to proprietary development technologies.

        InBlizzard's President in April 2010, Activision entered into1998. Mr. Morhaime served on the executive committee of Vivendi Games from January 1999, when Blizzard became a long-term exclusive relationship with Bungie,subsidiary of Vivendi Games, until the developer of game franchises includingHalo, Myth andMarathon, to bring Bungie's next big action game universe,Destiny, to market. During the termconsummation of the agreement, Activision has exclusive, worldwide rights to publish and distribute all future Bungie games based onDestiny on multiple platforms.

        Activision provides various formsBusiness Combination, when Blizzard became a subsidiary of product support to both our internally and externally developed content. Activision's central technology and development teams review, assess and provide support to products throughout their milestone development phases. Quality assurance personnel are also involved throughout the development and productionCompany. Mr. Morhaime holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of published content. Activision subjects all such content to extensive testing before release to ensure compatibility with all appropriate hardware systems and configurations and to minimize the number of bugs and other defects found in the products. To support our content, Activision generally provides 24-hour online access to customer service representatives, as well as live telephone operators who answer the help lines during regular business hours.California at Los Angeles.

Marketing, Sales, and DistributionBrian Stolz, Chief People Officer of Activision Blizzard

        ManyBrian Stolz became our Chief People Officer in May 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Stolz served as senior vice president of the neurology, dental, and generics businesses of Valeant Pharmaceuticals, a pharmaceutical company. Before that, Mr. Stolz served as Valeant's executive vice president of administration and its chief human capital officer. Prior to joining Valeant, Mr. Stolz held positions as a principal at ghSMART, a leadership consulting and advisory firm, and as an associate principal at McKinsey & Co., a strategy consulting firm. Mr. Stolz holds a B.S. degree in finance from Georgetown University and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard University.

Christopher Walther, Chief Legal Officer of Activision Blizzard

        Christopher Walther became our products contain software that enables customersChief Legal Officer in November 2009 and served as our Secretary from February 2010 until February 2011. Prior to "electronically register" withjoining us, online, which allows usMr. Walther held a number of positions of increasing responsibility within the legal department of The Procter & Gamble Company from 1992 to connect with our gamers directly. This provides2009, including serving as the general counsel for Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa, general counsel for Northeast Asia and, most recently, as general counsel for Western Europe. Mr. Walther also led Procter & Gamble's corporate and securities and mergers and acquisitions practices. Before joining Procter & Gamble, Mr. Walther served as a significant marketing toollaw clerk for direct advertising with our customers and customizationSenior Judge Harry W. Wellford of in-game advertising based on customer preferences and trends. Additionally, Activision's marketing efforts include activitiesthe United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Since 2012, Mr. Walther has served on the Internet (includingboard of directors of the Alliance for Children's Rights. Mr. Walther has also served as our representative on Facebook, Twitter, YouTubethe board of directors of the Entertainment Software Association since 2013. Mr. Walther holds a B.A. degree in history and other online social networksSpanish from Centre College and websites), public relations, printa J.D. degree from the University of Kentucky College of Law.

Riccardo Zacconi, Chief Executive Officer of King

        Riccardo Zacconi serves as the Chief Executive Officer of King and broadcast advertising, coordinated in-store and industry promotions (including merchandising and pointbecame an executive officer of purchase displays), participationActivision Blizzard in cooperative advertising programs, direct response vehicles, and product sampling through demonstration software distributed through the Internet or the digital online services provided by Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony. From time to time, we also receive marketing support from hardware manufacturers, mass appeal consumer products related to a game, and retailersFebruary 2016 in connection with their own promotional efforts.

        We believethe King Acquisition. Mr. Zacconi co-founded King in March 2003, and has served as its chief executive officer since its founding. Prior to founding King, Mr. Zacconi served as vice president of European sales and marketing at uDate.com, an online dating service, from 2002 until that our strong proven franchises generatecompany's acquisition later that year. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Zacconi served as entrepreneur in residence at Benchmark Capital Partners, a loyalventure capital firm. Prior to joining Benchmark Capital, he was managing director for Spray Network, an online messaging portal based in Hamburg, Germany, from 1999 until its sale in 2000. Prior to 1999, Mr. Zacconi served in various investment and devoted customer base that continues to engageconsulting positions of increasing responsibility with our franchisesThe Boston Consulting Group and purchase additional content asLEK Consulting, both of which are management consulting firms. Mr. Zacconi holds a result of their dedication to a franchise and satisfactionB.A. degree in economics from previous content purchases. We therefore market this additional content, including sequels, expansion packs and downloadable content, toward the established customer base as well as to broader audiences. In addition, we believe that we derive benefits for our licensed properties from the marketing and promotional activities undertaken by the underlying intellectual property owners,LUISS University in addition to our own marketing efforts.

        North American Retail Sales and Distribution.    Our products are available for sale or rental in thousands of retail outlets in North America. Our North American retail customers include, among others, Amazon, Best Buy, GameStop, Target, Toys "R" Us and Wal-Mart.

        In the U.S. and Canada, our products are primarily sold on a direct basis to mass-market retailers, consumer electronics stores, discount warehouses and game specialty stores, as well to consumers through direct digital purchases. We believe that a direct relationship with retailers results in more effective inventory management, merchandising and communications than would be possible through indirect relationships. We have implemented electronic data interchange linkages with many of our


Table of Contents

retailers to facilitate the placing and shipping of orders. We also sell our products to a limited number of distributors.

        International Retail Sales and Distribution.    Our products are sold internationally on a direct-to-retail basis, through third-party distribution and licensing arrangements, and through our wholly-owned European distribution subsidiaries. We conduct our international publishing activities through offices in Australia, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom ("U.K."). We often seek to maximize our worldwide revenues and profits by releasing high-quality foreign language releases concurrently with English language releases and by continuing to expand the number of direct selling relationships we maintain with key retailers in major territories.

        Digital Distribution.    Online and digital distribution channels are continuing to grow and comprise a significant part of our business. Most of our products and content are sold in a digital format, which allows consumers to purchase and download the content at their convenience directly to their PC, console system, or handheld, mobile or tablet device. We partner with digital distributors to utilize this growing method of distribution. We also make downloadable content and in-game microtransactions available to our customers to enhance their gaming experience through the digital online services mainly provided by Microsoft and Sony. In addition, we are exploring new business models involving digital distribution, including offering free-to-play games with monetization through in-game microtransactions.

Manufacturing

        Activision prepares a set of master program copies, documentation and packaging materials for our products for each hardware platform on which the product will be released. With respect to products for use on the Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony systems, our disk duplication, packaging, printing, manufacturing, warehousing, assembly and shipping are performed by third-party subcontractors and Activision-owned distribution facilities.

        To maintain protection over their hardware technologies, Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony generally specify or control the manufacturing and assembly of finished products and license their hardware technologies to us. We deliver the master materials to the licensor or its approved replicator, which then manufactures finished goods and delivers them to us for distribution under our label. At the time our product unit orders are filled by the manufacturer, we become responsible for the costs of manufacturing and the applicable per unit royalty on such units, even if the units do not ultimately sell.

Blizzard—Business Overview

Strategy

Maintain and Build upon Our Leadership Position in the Subscription-Based MMORPG Category and PC Online Categories. Currently, Blizzard operates five franchises, with a sixth slated for release in the spring of 2016. Our games are available in many countries and regions including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Europe (including Russia), Mexico, New Zealand, South Korea, Southeast Asia, the U.S., and the regions of Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Blizzard plans to maintain and build upon our leadership position in online gaming by regularly providing new content, game features and online services to further enhance the loyalty of our subscriber base, as well as to expand our global game footprint to new geographies.

        Blizzard's strategy encompasses a careful and long-held approach to growing its community and deepening its engagement with high-quality content.Italy.


Table of Contents

ProductsEmployees

        World of Warcraft, the leading subscription-based MMORPGAt December 31, 2017, we had approximately 9,800 total full-time and #1 PC franchise by lifetime revenues, was initially launched in November 2004.World of Warcraft is available in multiple languages and has earned awards and praise from publications around the world. Since the first release ofWorld of Warcraft, Blizzard has launched five expansion packs in all regions in which the game is supported. The most recent expansion,World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, which was released in November 2014. We expect the next expansion,World of Warcraft: Legion, to be released in the summer of 2016.

        In July 2010, Blizzard launched the real-time strategy PC game,StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty®, simultaneously around the world. The first game in the StarCraft franchise was released in 1998 and was an early leader in global eSports and remains so today. In November 2015, Blizzard released the second expansion pack,StarCraft II: Legacy of the Void™, completing the StarCraft II trilogy.

        In May 2012, Blizzard released the action role-playing gameDiablo III for the PC at retail and through digital distribution. The first Diablo game was released in 1996. In subsequent years, Blizzard released an expansion pack for the game,Reaper of Souls™, that was also made available on next-generation and prior-generation consoles. In June 2015,Diablo III and its expansion were released for PC in China.

        Blizzard commercially launchedHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, an online collectible card game, in March 2014. Later in 2014, additional content for the game was released, and versions of the game for iOS, Android, and Windows tablet devices became available. In April 2015,Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft was released for iOS and Android smartphones. Three new content releases were also introduced in 2015, with the most recent being the game's third adventure pack,The League of Explorers, in November 2015.Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft was Blizzard's first free-to play game.

        In June 2015, Blizzard releasedHeroes of the Storm, a new online hero brawler.Heroes of the Storm brings together a diverse cast of iconic characters from Blizzard's realms of science fiction and fantasy, including the Warcraft®, StarCraft, and Diablo universes. The game is free to play, while individual heroes, skins, and other items can be purchased (or earned) in-game.

        Additionally, Blizzard maintains an online gaming service, Battle.net. Battle.net facilitates digital distribution and online social connectivity across all Blizzard games.

Product Development and Support

        As a development studio and the creator and publisher of the World of Warcraft, Diablo, StarCraft, Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, and Heroes of the Storm franchises, Blizzard focuses on creating well-designed, high-quality games. Product development is handled internally by a strong core group of talented designers, producers, programmers, artists, and sound engineers. To maintain player engagement and attract new players, Blizzard continues to develop new expansions and patches to upgrade its games. In addition to its headquarters in Irvine, California, Blizzard maintains offices in or around Austin, Texas; San Francisco, California; Paris, France; Cork, Ireland; Seoul, South Korea; Singapore; Shanghai, China; and Taipei, Taiwan to provide 24/7 game support to players ofWorld of Warcraft and other Blizzard games in their native language, enhance online community management, and tailor marketing initiatives to specific regions.

Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

        Blizzard distributes its products and generates revenues worldwide through various means, including: subscriptions; sales of prepaid subscription cards; add-on services and products such as card packs, heroes, realm transfers, faction changes, character level boost, character customizations and skin, and other cosmetic and functional items; retail sales of physical "boxed" products; online download sales of PC products; purchases and downloads via third-party console, mobile and tablet platforms; and licensing of software to third-party or related party companies that distribute World of Warcraft,


Table of Contents

Diablo, StarCraft, Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, and Heroes of the Storm products. Manypart-time employees. At December 31, 2017, approximately 175 of our services and products are digitally enabled, which allows usfull-time employees were subject to take advantage of these rapidly growing channels and to reinforce Blizzard's long-term relationshipsfixed-term employment agreements with its gamers. In addition, Blizzard operates the online gaming service, Battle.net, which attracts millions of active players, making it one of the largest online game-related services in the world. The service offers players communications features, social networking, player matching and digital content delivery and is designed to allow people to connect regardless of what Blizzard game they are playing.

Other—Business Overview

Media Networks

        Media Networks is a new division devoted to eSports and builds on our competitive gaming efforts by creating ways to deliver the best-in-class fan experience across games, platforms and geographies with a long-term strategy of monetization through advertising, sponsorships, tournaments, and premium content. On December 22, 2015, we acquired the business of Major League Gaming, Inc. to expand our reach across the rapidly-growing eSports ecosystem by adding proven live streaming capabilities and technologies to the Media Networks division. See Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain additional information regarding the acquisition of MLG.

Studiosus.

        The launch in 2015majority of our filmemployees in France, Germany, Spain, and television studiosItaly are subject to collective agreements as a part of normal business is an important steppractices in implementing our strategy of expanding the platforms through whichthose countries. In addition, certain employees in those countries are subject to collective bargaining agreements. To date, we offer our compelling intellectual property to existing fans and new audiences around the world. This includes an animated Skylanders television series which is already in production and expected to be released in the fall of 2016. In the longer term we are working on developing a robust cinematic universe based on the Call of Duty franchise.have not experienced any labor-related work stoppages.

Distribution

        Through our Distribution business we distribute interactive entertainment hardware and software products in Europe through our European distribution subsidiaries: Centresoft, in the U.K., and NBG, in Germany. These subsidiaries act as wholesalers in the distribution of products and also provide packaging, logistical and sales services. They provide services to our publishing operations and to various third-party publishers, including Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony. Centresoft is Sony's preferred distributor of PlayStation products to the independent retail sector of the U.K.

Additional Financial Information

        See Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 13 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain additional information regarding operating segments and geographic areas. See the Critical Accounting Policies section under Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a discussion of our practices with regard to several working capital items, such as rights of returns, and inventory practices.return. See the Management's"Management's Overview of Business TrendsTrends" under Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a discussion of the impact of seasonality on our business. See Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for information regarding product development expense during the past three years.


Table of ContentsAvailable Information

Available Information

        Our website, located athttp: https://www.activisionblizzard.com, allows free-of-charge access free-of-charge to our Annual Reportannual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to those reportsdocuments filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The information found on our website is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this or any other report that we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

        The        Our SEC filings are also available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's website at https://www.sec.gov. Additionally, the public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 (information20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is availablemay be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330). The SEC also maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330.


http://www.sec.gov.Table of Contents

Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS

        We wish to caution the reader that the following important risk factors, and those risk factors described elsewhere in this report or in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those stated in forward-looking statements contained in this document and elsewhere. These risks are not presented in order of importance or probability of occurrence. Further, the risks described below are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. Any of these risks may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, profitability, cash flows, liquidity, or stock price.

WeIf we do not consistently deliver popular, high-quality content in a timely manner, or if consumers prefer competing products, our business may not realize the anticipated benefits from the King Acquisition.be negatively impacted.

        On February 23, 2016,Consumer preferences for games are usually cyclical and difficult to predict, and even the most successful content remains popular for only limited periods of time, unless refreshed with new content or otherwise enhanced. In order to remain competitive, we completedmust continuously develop new products or enhancements to our existing products. These products or enhancements may not be well-received by consumers, even if well-reviewed and of high quality. Further, competitors may develop content that imitates or competes with our best-selling games, potentially taking sales away from them or reducing our ability to charge the King Acquisition. The acquisitionsame prices we have historically charged for our products. These competing products may take a larger share of consumer spending than anticipated, which could cause product sales to fall below expectations. If we do not continue to develop consistently high-quality and integrationwell-received games, if our marketing fails to resonate with our consumers, if consumers lose interest in a genre of games we produce, if the King business exposesuse of cross-promotion within our mobile games to retain consumers becomes less effective, or if our competitors develop more successful products or offer competitive products at lower prices, our revenues and profit margins could decline. Further, a failure by us to develop a numberhigh-quality product, or our development of legal, financial, accounting, tax, managerial, operationala product that is otherwise not well-received, could potentially result in additional expenditures to respond to consumer demands, harm our reputation, and increase the likelihood that our future products will not be well-received. The increased importance of downloadable content to our business amplifies these risks, as downloadable content for poorly-received games typically generates lower-than-expected sales. In addition, our own best-selling products could compete with our other risksgames, reducing sales for those other games.

        Additionally, consumer expectations regarding the quality, performance and challenges. Anyintegrity of our products and services are high. Consumers may be critical of our brands, games, services and/or business practices for a wide variety of reasons, and such negative reactions may not be foreseeable or within our control to manage effectively. For example, if our games or services, such as our proprietary online gaming service, do not function as consumers expect, whether because they fail to function as advertised or otherwise, our sales may suffer. The risk that this may occur is particularly pronounced with respect to our games with online features because they involve ongoing consumer expectations, which we may not be able to consistently satisfy. Our games with online features are also frequently updated, increasing the risk that a game may contain significant "bugs." If any of these risks or challenges could adversely affect our financial position, profitabilityissues occur, consumers may stop playing the game and stock price. Such risks and challenges include, but are not limitedmay be less likely to return to the following:game as often in the future, which may negatively impact our business.

    King

            Further, delays in product releases or disruptions following the commercial release of one or more new products could underperform relative tonegatively impact our expectationsbusiness on our revenues and the price that we paid for it.

    Kingreputation and could cause our financial results of operations to differ from our own or the investment community's expectations in any given period, or over the longer-term.

    The tax consequences of the King Acquisition, or the tax treatment of King's operations going forward, could give rise to incremental tax liabilities that are difficult to predict.

    Earnings charges relating to the King Acquisition could adversely impact our operating results in any given period, and the impact may be substantiallymaterially different from periodexpectations. If we fail to period.

    The integration of King could create demands onrelease our management, operational resources and financial and internal control systems thatproducts in a timely manner, or if we are unable to effectively handle.

    We could experience difficulty in integrating King's personnel, operationscontinue to extend the life of existing games by adding features and financial and other systems and retaining key employees.

    By acquiring King wefunctionality that will encourage continued engagement with the game, our business may have assumed unknown liabilities or internal control deficiencies, and the liabilities that we assumed as a result of the King Acquisition may prove greater than anticipated. The liabilities we assumed include those with respect to King's ongoing legal proceedings, including purported securities class action lawsuits relating to King's initial public offering in March 2014, and those with respect to King's tax liabilities in various jurisdictions. Any of these liabilities or deficiencies may increase our expenses, adversely affect our financial position or cause us to fail to meet our public financial reporting obligations.
be negatively impacted.


Table of Contents

            Additionally, the amount of lead time and cost involved in the development of high-quality products is increasing, and the longer the lead time involved in developing a product and the greater the allocation of financial resources to such product, the more critical it is that we accurately predict consumer demand for such product. If our future products do not achieve expected consumer acceptance or generate sufficient revenues upon introduction, we may not be able to recover the substantial up-front development and marketing costs associated with those products.

    We depend on a relatively small number of franchises for a significant portion of our revenues and profits.

            We follow a franchise model and a significant portion of our revenues has historically been derived from products based on a relatively small number of popular franchises. These products are responsible for a disproportionately high percentage of our profits. For example, revenues associated with the Call of Duty, Candy Crush, World of Warcraft, and Overwatch franchises, collectively, accounted for approximately 66% of our net revenues—and a significantly higher percentage of our operating income—for 2017. We expect that a relatively limited number of popular franchises will continue to produce a disproportionately high percentage of our revenues and profits. Due to this dependence on a limited number of franchises, the failure to achieve anticipated results by one or more products based on these franchises could negatively impact our business. Additionally, if the popularity of a franchise declines, we may have to write off the unrecovered portion of the underlying intellectual property assets, which could negatively impact our business.

    We may be unable to effectively manage the continued growth in the scope and complexity of our business, including our expansion into new business models that are untested and into adjacent business opportunities with large, established competitors.

            We have experienced significant growth in the scope and complexity of our business, including through the acquisition of King and the development of our MLG, Studios and consumer products businesses, and remain ambitious as to the future growth in the scope and complexity of our business. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to manage this expanded business and our aspirations for continued expansion. We have dedicated resources both to new business models that are largely untested, as is the case with esports, and to adjacent business opportunities in which very large competitors have an established presence, as is the case with our Studios and consumer products businesses. We do not know to what extent our future expansions will be successful. Further, even if successful, the growth of our business could create significant challenges for our management, operational, and financial resources, and could increase existing strain on, and divert focus from, our core businesses. If not managed effectively, this growth could result in the over-extension of our operating infrastructure, and our management systems, information technology systems, and internal controls and procedures may not be adequate to support this growth. Failure to adequately manage our growth in any of these ways may cause damage to our brand or otherwise negatively impact our business. Further, any failure by these new businesses may damage our reputation or otherwise negatively impact our core business of interactive software products and entertainment content.

    The increasing importance of free-to-play games to our business exposes us to the risks of that business model, including the dependence on a relatively small number of consumers for a significant portion of revenues and profits from any given game.

    As a result of, among other things, the King Acquisition, we have recordedare more dependent on our ability to develop, enhance and monetize free-to-play games, such as the games in our Candy Crush franchise andHearthstone. As such, we are increasingly exposed to the risks of the free-to-play business model. For example, we may invest in the development of new free-to-play interactive entertainment products that do not achieve significant goodwillcommercial success, in which case our revenues from those products likely will be lower than anticipated and we may not recover our development costs. Further, if: (1) we


    Table of Contents

    are unable to continue to offer free-to-play games that encourage consumers to purchase our virtual currency and subsequently use it to buy our virtual items; (2) we fail to offer monetization features that appeal to these consumers; (3) these consumers do not continue to play our free-to-play games or purchase virtual items at the same rate; (4) our platform providers make it more difficult or expensive for players to purchase our virtual currency; or (5) we cannot encourage significant additional consumers to purchase virtual items in our free-to-play games, our business may be negatively impacted.

            Furthermore, as there are relatively low barriers to entry to developing mobile or online free-to-play or other casual games, we expect new competitors to enter the market and existing competitors to allocate more resources to developing and marketing competing games and applications. We compete, or may compete, with a vast number of small companies and individuals who are able to create and launch casual games and other definite lived intangible assetscontent using relatively limited resources and with relatively limited start-up time or expertise. Competition for the attention of consumers on mobile devices is intense, as the number of applications on mobile devices has been increasing dramatically, which, in turn, has required increased marketing to garner consumer awareness and attention. This increased competition could negatively impact our balance sheet. business. In addition, a continuing industry shift to free-to-play games could result in a deprioritization of our other products by traditional retailers and distributors.

    Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and if we do not adapt to, and appropriately allocate our resources among, emerging technologies and business models, our business may be negatively impacted.

            Technology changes rapidly in the interactive entertainment industry. We must continually anticipate and adapt our products, distribution channels and business models to emerging technologies and delivery platforms in order to stay competitive. Forecasting our revenues and profitability for these new products, distribution channels and business models is inherently uncertain and volatile, and if we invest in the development of interactive entertainment products or distribution channels incorporating a new technology or for a new platform that does not achieve significant commercial success, whether because of competition or otherwise, we may not recover the often substantial "up front" costs of developing and marketing those products and distribution channels, or recover the opportunity cost of diverting management and financial resources away from other products or distribution channels. Further, our competitors may adapt to an emerging technology or business model more quickly or effectively than we do, creating products that are technologically superior to ours, more appealing to consumers, or both.

            If, on the other hand, we elect not to pursue the development of products incorporating a new technology or for new platforms, or otherwise elect not to pursue new business models, that achieve significant commercial success, it may have adverse consequences. It may take significant time and resources to shift product development resources to that technology, platform or business model, as the case may be, and may be more difficult to compete against existing products incorporating that technology or for that platform or against companies using that business model.

    The increasing importance of digital sales to our business exposes us to the risks of that business model, including greater competition.

            The proportion of our revenues derived from digital content delivery, as compared to traditional retail sales, continues to increase. The increased importance of digital content delivery in our industry increases our potential competition, as the minimum capital needed to produce and publish a digitally delivered game, particularly a new game for mobile platforms, may be significantly less than that needed to produce and publish one that is purchased through retail distribution and is played on a game console or PC. Also, while digitally-distributed products generally have higher profit margins than retail sales, the risk profile for us, as the publisher, may be increased as business shifts to digital distribution, since the volume of initial orders from retailers for physical discs could be reduced.


    Table of Contents

    Further, the providers of the platforms through which we digitally distribute content are also publishers of their own content distributed on those platforms, and, therefore, a platform provider may give priority to its own products or those of our competitors.

    Competition within, and to, the interactive entertainment industry is intense, and competitors may succeed in reducing our sales.

            Within the interactive entertainment industry, we compete with other publishers of interactive entertainment software, both within and outside the United States. Our competitors include very large corporations with significantly greater financial, marketing and product development resources than we have. Our larger competitors may be able to leverage their greater financial, technical, personnel and other resources to provide larger budgets for development and marketing and make higher offers to licensors and developers for commercially desirable properties, as well as adopt more aggressive pricing policies to develop more commercially successful video game products than we do. In addition, competitors with large product lines and popular games typically have greater leverage with retailers, distributors and other customers, who may be willing to promote products with less consumer appeal in return for access to those competitors' more popular games.

            Additionally, we compete with other forms of entertainment and leisure activities. As our business continues to expand in complexity and scope, we have increased exposure to additional competitors, including those with access to large existing user bases and control over distribution channels. Further, it is difficult to predict and prepare for rapid changes in consumer demand that could materially alter public preferences for different forms of entertainment and leisure activities. Failure to adequately identify and adapt to these competitive pressures could negatively impact our business.

    If we are unable to sustain traditional pricing levels for our products, our business may be negatively impacted.

            If we are unable to sustain traditional pricing levels for our console or PC titles or the associated downloadable content, whether due to competitive pressure, because retailers or other third parties elect to price these products at a lower price, or otherwise, it could have a negative impact on our business. Further, our decisions around the development of new game content are grounded in assumptions about eventual pricing levels. If there is price compression in the market after these decisions are made, it could have a negative impact on our business.

    If we do not continue to attract and retain skilled personnel, we will be unable to effectively conduct our business.

            Our employees are our greatest asset. As such, our success depends to a significant extent on our ability to identify, attract, hire, retain, and utilize the abilities of qualified personnel, particularly personnel with the specialized skills needed to create and sell the high-quality, well-received content upon which our business is substantially dependent. Our industry is generally characterized by a high level of employee mobility, competitive compensation programs, and aggressive recruiting among competitors for employees with technical, marketing, sales, engineering, product development, creative, and/or management skills. We may have difficulties in attracting and retaining skilled personnel or may incur significant costs in order to do so. If we are unable to attract additional qualified employees or retain and utilize the services of key personnel, it could have a negative impact on our business.


    Table of Contents

    We rely on external developers to develop some of our software products.

            We rely on external software developers to develop some of our software products. Because we depend on these developers, we are subject to the following risks:

      continuing strong demand for top-tier developers' resources, combined with the recognition they receive in connection with their work, may cause developers who worked for us in the past either to work for a competitor in the future or to renegotiate agreements with us on terms less favorable to us;

      limited financial resources and business expertise and inability to retain skilled personnel may force developers out of business prior to completing products for us or require us to fund additional costs;

      a competitor may acquire the business of one or more key developers or sign them to exclusive development arrangements and, in either case, we would not be able to realizecontinue to engage such developers' services for our products, except for any period of time for which the valuedeveloper is contractually obligated to complete development for us; and

      reliance on external developers reduces our visibility into, and control over, development schedules and operational outcomes compared to those when utilizing internal development resources.

            Increased competition for skilled third-party software developers also has compelled us to agree to make significant advance payments on royalties to game developers. If the products subject to these arrangements do not generate sufficient revenues to recover these royalty advances, we would have to write off unrecovered portions of these assets,payments, which could negatively impact our business. Typically, we may be requiredpay developers a royalty based on a percentage of net revenues from product sales, less agreed upon deductions, but from time to incur charges relatingtime, we have agreed to pay developers fixed per unit product royalties after royalty advances are fully recouped. To the impairmentextent that sales prices of these assets.

products on which we have agreed to pay a fixed per unit royalty are marked down, it could negatively impact our business.

We engage in strategic transactions and may encounter difficulties in integrating acquired businesses or otherwise realizing the anticipated benefits of the transactions.

        As part of our business strategy, from time to time, we acquire, make investments in, or enter into strategic alliances and joint ventures with, complementary businesses. These transactions may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including: (A)(1) in the case of an acquisition, (i) the potential for the acquired business to underperform relative to our expectations and the acquisition price, (ii) the potential for the acquired business to cause our financial results to differ from expectations in any given period, or over the longer-term, (iii) unexpected tax consequences from the acquisition, or the tax treatment of the acquired business's operations going forward, giving rise to incremental tax liabilities that are difficult to predict, (iv) difficulty in integrating the acquired business, its operations and operationsits employees in an efficient and effective manner, (ii)(v) any unknown liabilities or internal control deficiencies assumed as part of the acquisition, and (iii)(vi) the potential loss of key employees of the acquired businesses, and, (B)(2) in the case of an investment, alliance or joint venture, (i) our ability to cooperate with our partner, (ii) our partner having economic, business or legal interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours, and (iii) the potential that our partner may be unable to meet its economic or other obligations, which wouldmay require us to fulfill those obligations alone. If any such transaction involves an entity outside of the United States, it may also subject us to the risks and uncertainties of international trade, including the risk that our operations outside the United States could be conducted by our employees, contractors, third-party partners, representatives or agents in ways that violate anti-bribery laws. Further, any such transaction may involve the risk that our senior management's attention will be excessively diverted from our other operations, the risk that our industry does not evolve as anticipated and that any intellectual property or personnel skills acquired do not prove to be those needed for our future


Table of Contents

success, and the risk that our strategic objectives, cost savings or other anticipated benefits are otherwise not achieved.

We depend on a relatively small number of franchises for a significant portion of our revenues and profits.

        A significant portion of our revenues has historically been derived from products based on a relatively small number of popular franchises and these products are responsible for a disproportionately high percentage of our profits. For example, revenues associated with the Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, Skylanders, and Destiny franchises accounted for approximately 71% of our net revenues, and a significantly higher percentage of our operating income, for 2015. Similarly, King's top two franchises—Candy Crush and Farm Heroes—accounted for a substantial majority of King's revenues in 2015. We expect that a relatively limited number of popular franchises will continue to produce a disproportionately high percentage of our revenues and profits. Due to this dependence on a limited number of franchises, the failure to achieve anticipated results by one or more products based on these franchises could negatively impact our business.

If we do not consistently deliver high-quality content, or if consumers prefer competing products, our sales could suffer.

        While many new products are regularly introduced in our industry, only a relatively small number of games account for a significant portion of revenues, and an even greater portion of profit. It is difficult to produce high-quality content and to predict, prior to production and distribution, what games will be well-received, even if they are well-reviewed and of high-quality. Competitors often develop content that imitates or competes with our best-selling games, and take sales away from them or reduce our ability to charge the same prices we have historically charged for our products. Products published by our competitors may take a larger share of consumer spending than anticipated, which could cause our product sales to fall below expectations. Consumers may lose interest in a genre of games we produce. If we do not continue to develop consistently high- quality and well-received games, or if our competitors develop more successful products or offer competitive products at lower prices, our revenues, margins and profitability could decline. The increased importance of downloadable content to our business amplifies these risks, as downloadable content for poorly-received games


Table of Contents

typically generates lower-than-expected sales. In addition, our own best-selling products could compete with our other games, reducing sales for those other games. Further, a failure by us to develop a high-quality product, or our development of a product that is otherwise not well-received, could harm our reputation and increase the likelihood that our future products will not be well-received.

We have taken on significantOur debt which could adversely affect our business.

        Prior to the Purchase Transaction,As of December 31, 2017, the Company maintained extremely low levels of debt. In connection with the Purchase Transaction, we entered into a credit agreement for a $2.5 billion secured term loan facility and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility. The credit agreement was amended in connection with the King Acquisition (as amended from time to time, the "Credit Agreement") to, among other things, provide for an incremental $2.3 billion secured term loan facility. In addition, in connection with the Purchase Transaction, we issued, at par, $1.5 billion of 5.625% unsecured senior notes due September 2021 (the "2021 Notes") and $750 million of 6.125% unsecured senior notes due September 2023 (the "2023 Notes" and, together with the 2021 Notes, the "Notes"). As of the date hereof, the Company hashad approximately $5.9$4.4 billion of long-term debt outstanding. The increasedOur debt burden could have important consequences, including: increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry; requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations tofor the payment of principal of, and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flow to fund our operations, growth strategy, working capital, capital expenditures, future business opportunities, and other general corporate purposes; exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates with respect to any borrowings that are at variablefloating rates of interest; restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures; limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, research and development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions; and placing us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors who are less highly leveraged. In addition, a significant portion of our cash and investments are held outside the United States, and we may not be able to service our debt without undergoing the costs of repatriating those funds.

The agreements governing our debt contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to operate our business.

        Agreements governing our indebtedness, including the indenture governing the Notesour credit agreement and the Credit Agreement,indentures governing our notes, impose operating and financial restrictions on our activities. These restrictions require us to comply with or maintain certain financial tests and ratios. In addition, the indentureunder certain circumstances, our credit agreement and credit agreementindentures may limit or prohibit our ability to, among other things:

    incur additional debt and guarantees;

    pay distributions or dividends and repurchase stock;

    make other restricted payments, including without limitation, certain restricted investments;

    create liens;

    enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries;

    engage in transactions with affiliates; and

    enter into mergers, consolidations or sales of substantially all of our assets.

activities. In addition, we are required to maintain a maximum total net debt ratio calculated pursuant to a financial maintenance covenant under the Credit Agreement.


Table of Contents

        These restrictions on our ability to operate our business could seriously harm our business by, among other things, limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition and other corporate opportunities.

credit agreement. Further, various risks, uncertainties and events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with these covenants. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in our financing agreements could result in a default under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. Such a default would permit lenders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt.agreements. Under these circumstances, we might not have sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all of our obligations, including our obligations under the indenture governing the Notesour credit agreement or the Credit Agreement.indentures governing our notes. In addition, the limitations imposed by financing agreements on our ability to incur additional debt and to take other actions might significantly impair our ability to obtain other financing. We cannot assure youThere can be no assurances that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements or that we will be able to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

We may not be able to borrow funds under our revolving credit facility if we are not able to meet the conditions to borrowing under that facility.

        We view our revolving credit facility as a source of available liquidity. This facility contains various conditions, covenants and representations with which we must be in compliance in order to borrow funds. We have not borrowed under the revolving credit facility to date, but if we wish to do so, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance with these conditions, covenants and representations at such time.

We may be unable to effectively manage the growth in scope and complexity of our business.

        We have experienced significant growth in the scope and complexity of our business, including through the development of our Media Networks and Studios businesses. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to manage this expanded business. The growth of our business could create significant challenges for our management, operational, and financial resources, and could increase existing strain on, and divert focus from, our core businesses.

        In addition, the growth of these new businesses may require significant capital expenditures and allocation of valuable management and employee resources. If not managed effectively, this growth could result in the over-extension of our operating infrastructure, and our management systems, information technology systems, and internal controls and procedures may not be adequate to support this growth. Failure to adequately manage our growth in any of these ways may cause damage to our brand or otherwise negatively impact our business.

Our financial performance is partly driven by our success in the subscription-based massively multiplayer online role-playing game category, and we may be negatively impacted if consumer preferences trend away from subscription-based games.

        A portion of our revenues is generated by subscription fees paid by consumers who playWorld of Warcraft. If consumer demand forWorld of Warcraft declines or if new technologies, play patterns or genres are developed that replace MMORPGs or consumer preferences trend away from subscription-based MMORPGs in favor of free-to-play MMORPGs, it may negatively impact our business.

Sales of titles in certain of our franchises may be affected by the availability of toys and hardware peripherals, increasing our exposure to imbalances between projected and actual demand.

        Titles in our Skylanders franchise involve "smart toys," consisting of action figures and accessories, along with an electronic "portal," which, when used with a figure or accessory, allows a player to store and access information about his or her performance in the game. Similarly, titles in our Guitar Hero


Table of Contents

franchise use guitar-shaped controllers and other hardware peripherals. We sell the action figures and accessories for Skylanders both bundled with the software for the title and on a stand-alone basis. Consumers may not want to buy the related software if they cannot also buy the "smart toys" or accessories. If we underestimate demand or otherwise are unable to produce sufficient quantities of toys or accessories of an acceptable quality or allocate too few toys or accessories to geographic markets where demand exceeds supply, we will forego revenues. This may also create greater opportunities for competitors to develop competitive product offerings. In addition, if we overestimate demand and make too many toys or accessories, or allocate too many toys or accessories to geographic markets where there is insufficient demand, we may incur unrecoverable manufacturing costs for unsold units as well as for unsold game software. Similarly, if we overestimate demand for our Guitar Hero games, we may incur unrecoverable manufacturing costs for unsold games. In any case, unsound hardware manufacturing or allocation decisions may negatively impact our business.

The "smart toys," accessories and hardware peripherals related to certain of our franchises, expose us to hardware manufacturing and shipping risks, including availability of sufficient third-party manufacturing capacity and increases in manufacturing and shipping costs.

        The majority of the manufacturers of the "smart toys" involved in our Skylanders franchise and the hardware peripherals used in our Guitar Hero games are third parties located in China. Anythinglegal proceedings that impacts our ability to import these products or the ability of those manufacturers to produce or otherwise supply us with hardware meeting our quality and safety standards or increases the manufacturers' costs of production may adversely impact our ability to supply that hardware to the market and the prices we must pay for that hardware. Examples of such impacts include: the utilization of any such manufacturer's capacity by another company, changes in safety, environmental or other regulations applicable to the hardware and the manufacturing thereof, natural or manmade disasters that disrupt manufacturing, transportation or communications, labor shortages, civil unrest or issues generally negatively impacting international companies operating in China, increases in the price of petroleum or other raw materials, increases in fuel prices and other shipping costs, and increases in local labor costs in China. Moreover, the failure of those manufacturers to consistently deliver Skylanders action figures or portals and/or Guitar Hero hardware peripherals meeting the quality and safety standards we require could negatively impact our business.

The increasing importance of free-to-play games to our business exposes us to the risks of that business model, including the dependence on a relatively small number of consumers for a significant portion of revenues and profits from any game

        As a result of the King Acquisition, we will be more dependent on our ability to develop, enhance and monetize free-to-play games. These games are available for download to consumers for free, and only generate revenue if consumers use in-game virtual currency to purchase, for example, entertainment time, game boosters, and access to additional content. A relatively small portion of our player network accounts for a large portion of our revenues from our free-to-play games, such as those in our Candy Crush franchise. If we are unable to continue to offer games that encourage these consumers to purchase our virtual currency and subsequently use it to buy our virtual items, if we fail to offer monetization features that appeal to these consumers, if these consumers do not continue to play our games or to purchase virtual items at the same rate, or if we cannot encourage significant additional consumers to purchase virtual items in our games, it could negatively impact our business. Also, if our platform providers make it more difficult or expensive for players to purchase, or we otherwise fail to sell, our virtual currency, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Transitions in console platforms could adversely affect the market for interactive entertainment software.

        When new console platforms are announced or introduced into the market, consumers typically reduce their purchases of game console entertainment software products for prior console platforms in


Table of Contents

anticipation of purchasing a new platform and products for that platform. During these periods, sales of the game console entertainment software products we publish may decline until new platforms achieve wide consumer acceptance. Platform transitions may have a comparable impact on sales of downloadable content, amplifying the impact on our revenues. This decline may not be offset by increased sales of products for the new console platforms. Conversely, actions we take to curtail the reduction of purchases of products for prior console platforms during the transition may harm sales of products we publish for prior-generation platforms. In addition, as console hardware moves through its life cycle, hardware manufacturers typically enact price reductions and decreasing prices may put downward pressure on software prices. During platform transitions, we may simultaneously incur costs both in continuing to develop and market new titles for prior-generation video game platforms, which may not sell at premium prices, and also in developing products for next -generation platforms, which may not generate immediate or near term revenues. As a result, our business and operating results may be more volatile and difficult to predict during platform transitions than during other times.

Our business is highly dependent on the success, timely release and availability of new video game platforms and on the continued availability of, and support for, existing video game platforms, as well as our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms.

        We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the sale of products for play on video game platforms manufactured by third parties, such as Sony's PS4 and PS3, Microsoft's Xbox One and Xbox 360, and Nintendo's Wii U and Wii. For example, sales of products for consoles accounted for 51% of our consolidated net revenues in 2015. The success of our business is driven in large part by our ability to accurately predict which platforms will be successful in the marketplace, our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms, the availability of an adequate supply of these video game platforms and the continued support for these platforms by their manufacturers. We must make product development decisions and commit significant resources well in advance of the anticipated introduction of a new platform.

We must make significant expenditures to develop products for new platforms that may not be successful.

        We must make substantial product development and other investments in a particular platform well in advance of introduction of the platform and may be required to realign our product portfolio and development efforts in response to market changes. Furthermore, development costs for new console platforms are greater than those costs for the then-current console platforms. If increased costs are not offset by higher revenues and other cost efficiencies, our business could be negatively impacted. If the platforms for which we develop new software products or modify existing products do not attain significant market penetration, we may not be able to recover our development costs, which could be significant.

Platform licensors frequently control the manufacturing of, and have broad approval rights over, interactive entertainment products.

        Generally, when we develop interactive entertainment software products for hardware platforms offered by Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo, the products are manufactured exclusively by that hardware manufacturer or their approved replicator. The agreements with these manufacturers include certain provisions, such as approval rights over all software products and related promotional materials and the ability to change the fee they charge for the manufacturing of products, which allow them substantial influence over the cost and the release schedule of such interactive entertainment software products. In addition, because each of the manufacturers is also a publisher of games for its own hardware platforms and manufactures products for all of its other licensees, a manufacturer may give priority to its own products or those of our competitors in the event of insufficient manufacturing capacity. Accordingly, Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo could cause unanticipated delays in the release of our products as well as increases to projected development, manufacturing, marketing or distribution costs, any of which could negatively impact our business.


Table of Contents

        In addition, platform licensors control our ability to provide online game capabilities for console platform products and, in large part, establish the financial terms and/or pricing on which these products and services are offered to consumers. Currently, Sony provides online capabilities for the PS4 and PS3, Microsoft provides online capabilities for the Xbox One and Xbox 360, and Nintendo provides online capabilities for the Wii U and Wii. In each case, compatibility code and/or the consent of the licensor are required for us to include online capabilities in its console products. The failure or refusal of licensors to approve our products could negatively impact our business.

We must negotiate with platform licensors to agree upon the royalty rates and other fees that must be paid to publish games for their platforms or distribute content on their networks, and therefore they can have significant influence on our costs.

        We pay a licensing fee to the hardware manufacturer for each copy of a product manufactured for that manufacturer's game platform. The platform license agreements we enter into with those manufacturers specify the fee and/or price that we must pay in order to publish games for that platform. Similarly, the platform licensors control the retail pricing for games and additional content purchased over their networks. The control that platform licensors have over the fee structures and/or pricing for their platforms and online networks could impact the volume of purchases of our products made over their network and our profitability. It is also possible that platform licensors will not renew our existing licenses and/or will decline to distribute our digital content on their networks. Any increase in fee structures and/or pricing, or nonrenewal of licenses, could have a negative impact on our business, particularly for Activision, as the publishing of products for console systems is the largest portion of Activision's business.

        Outside of fee arrangements, our agreement with any manufacturer typically gives it significant control over other aspects of the distribution of our products and services that we develop for that manufacturer's game platform. If the manufacturer establishes terms that restrict our offerings on its platform, or significantly impact the financial terms on which these products or services are offered to our customers, we may be unable to distribute our products or be forced to do so on a materially worse financial or business terms.

We rely on third-party platforms to distribute our free-to-play games and collect payments. If we are unable to maintain a good relationship with such platform providers, if their terms and conditions, methods of distribution, payment practices or pricing changed to our detriment, or if we violate, or if a platform provider believes that we have violated, the terms and conditions of its platform, our business may be negatively impacted.

        Following the King Acquisition, we expect to derive significant revenues from the distribution of our free-to-play games on third-party platforms such as the Apple App Store, the Google Play Store, and Facebook, and most of the virtual currency we sell is purchased using the payments processing systems of these platform providers. These platforms also serve as significant online distribution platforms for our games. We are subject to their standard terms and conditions for application developers, which govern the promotion, distribution and operation of games and other applications on their platforms. If we violate, or if a platform provider believes that we have violated, its terms and conditions, the particular platform provider may discontinue or limit our access to that platform, which would harm our business. Our business would also be harmed if: their platforms decline in popularity; they modify their current discovery mechanisms, communication channels available to developers, respective terms of service or other policies, including fees; they are required to change how they label free-to-play games or take payment for in-app purchases, or change how the personal information of consumers is made available to developers; or they develop their own competitive offerings.


Table of Contents

If we do not continue to attract and retain skilled personnel, we will be unable to effectively conduct our business.

        OneFrom time to time, we are involved in claims, suits, government investigations, audits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our most essential assets is our employeesbusiness, including actions with respect to intellectual property, competition and as such, our success depends to a significant extent on our ability to identify, hire, retainantitrust matters, privacy matters, tax matters, labor and utilize the abilities of qualified personnel, particularly personnel with the specialized skills needed to createemployment matters, unclaimed property matters, compliance and sell the high-quality, well- received content upon which our business is substantially dependent. The software industry is characterized by a high level of employee mobility and aggressive recruiting among competitors for employees with technical, marketing, sales, engineering, product development, creative and/or management skills. We may have difficulties in attracting and retaining skilled personnel or may incur significant costs in order to do so. If we are unable to attract additional qualified employees or retain and utilize the services of key personnel, it could have a negative impact on our business.

Our reputation with consumers is critical to our success. Negative consumer perceptions about our brands, games, services and/or business practices may damage our business and any costs incurred in addressing consumer concerns may increase our operating expenses.

        Individual consumers form our ultimate customer base, and consumer expectations regarding the quality, performance and integrity of our products and services are high. Consumers may be critical of our brands, games, services and/or business practices for a wide variety of reasons. These negative consumer reactions may not be foreseeable or within our control to manage effectively. Actions we take to address consumer concerns may be costly and, in any case, may not be successful.commercial claims. In addition, negative consumer sentiment about our business practices may result in inquiries or investigations from


Table of Contents

regulatory agencies and consumer groups, as well as litigation, which, regardless of their outcome, may be damaging to our reputation.

        Claims, suits, government investigations, audits and proceedings are inherently difficult to predict and their results are subject to significant uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. Regardless of the outcome, such legal proceedings can have a materially adverse impact on us due to legal costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could result in reputational harm, substantial settlements, judgments, fines or penalties, criminal sanctions, consent decrees or orders preventing us from offering certain features, functionalities, products or services, requiring us to change our development process or other business practices.

        There is also inherent uncertainty in determining reserves for these matters. There is significant judgment required in the analysis of these matters, including assessing the probability of potential outcomes and determining whether a potential exposure can be reasonably estimated. In making these determinations, we, in consultation with outside counsel, examine the relevant facts and circumstances on a quarterly basis assuming, as applicable, a combination of settlement and litigated outcomes and strategies. Further, it may take time to develop factors on which reasonable judgments and estimates can be based. If we fail to establish appropriate reserves, our business could be negatively impacted.

Issues with the toys, accessories or hardware peripherals utilized in certain of our games may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities.

        We may experience issues with toys, accessories or peripherals that may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities. Any of these activities could result in increased governmental scrutiny, harm to our reputation, reduced demand by consumers for our products, decreased willingness by our customers to purchase, or by our partners to provide marketing support for, those products, denial or increased cost for insurance coverage, or additional safety and testing requirements, any of which could negatively impact our business.

Lawsuits have been filed, and may continue to be filed, against publishers of interactive entertainment software products.

        In prior years, lawsuits have been filed against numerous interactive entertainment companies, including against us, by the families of victims of violence, alleging that interactive entertainment products influence the behavior of the perpetrators of such violence. These lawsuits have been dismissed, but similar additional lawsuits could be filed in the future. Although our general liability insurance carrier has agreed to defend lawsuits of this nature with respect to the prior lawsuits, it is uncertain whether insurance carriers would do so in the future, or if such insurance carriers would cover all or any amounts for which we might be liable if such future lawsuits are not decided in our favor. Further, any such lawsuit could result in increased governmental scrutiny, harm to our reputation, reduced demand by consumers for our products, or decreased willingness by our customers to purchase, or by our partners to provide marketing support for, those products. Such results could divert development and management resources, increase legal fees and other costs and have other negative impacts on our business.

We are exposed to seasonality in the sale of our products.

        The interactive entertainment industry is somewhat seasonal, with the highest levels of consumer demand occurring during the year-end holiday buying season in the fourth quarter of the calendar year. As a negativeresult, our sales have historically been highest during the second half of the year, particularly for


Table of Contents

our Activision segment. Receivables and credit risk are likewise higher during the second half of the year, as retailers increase their purchases of our products in anticipation of the holiday season. Delays in development, approvals or manufacturing could affect the timing of the release of products, causing us to miss key selling periods such as the year-end holiday buying season, which could negatively impact our business.

Our business may be harmed if our distributors, retailers, development and licensing partners, or other third parties with whom we do business act in ways that put our brand at risk.

        In many cases, our business partners are given access to sensitive and proprietary information or control over our intellectual property in order to provide services and support to our team. These third parties may misappropriate our information or intellectual property and engage in unauthorized use of it or otherwise act in a way that places our brand at risk. The failure of these third parties to provide adequate services and technologies, the failure of third parties to adequately maintain or update their services and technologies or the misappropriation or misuse of this information or intellectual property could result in a disruption to our business operations or an adverse effect on our reputation, and may negatively impact our business.

We use open source software in connection with certain of our games and services, which may pose particular risks to our proprietary software, products, and services in a manner that could have a negative impact on our business.

        We use open source software in connection with certain of our games and the services we offer. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute open source software as part of their software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software or make available any derivative works of the open source code on unfavorable terms or at no cost. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our use of the open source software. Were it determined that our use was not in compliance with a particular license, we may be required to release our proprietary source code, pay damages for breach of contract, re-engineer our games or products, discontinue distribution in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis, or take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our game development efforts, any of which could harm our business.

If our games and services do not function as consumers expect, it may have a negative impact on our business.

        If our games and services do not function as consumers expect, whether because they fail to function as advertised or otherwise, our sales may suffer. The risk that this may occur is particularly pronounced with respect to our games with online features because they involve ongoing consumer expectations, which we may not be able to successfully satisfy. Our games with online features are also frequently updated, increasing the risk that a game may contain significant "bugs." Further, these games are reliant on third-party servers and platform providers, increasing the risk that a particular game may be unavailable when consumers attempt to access it or that navigation through a game may be slower than consumers expect. If any of these issues occur, consumers may stop playing the game


Table of Contents

and may be less likely to return to the game as often in the future. If our games and services do not function as consumers expect, it may negatively impact our business.

The future success of our business depends on our ability to release popular products in a timely manner.

        The life of any given console, handheld or mobile game product is relatively short and generally involves a relatively high level of sales during the first few months after the product's introduction, followed by a rapid decline in sales. Because revenues associated with an initial product launch generally constitute a high percentage of the total revenues associated with the life of a product, delays in product releases or disruptions following the commercial release of one or more new products could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and reputation and could cause our results of operations to be materially different from expectations. It is therefore important for us to continue to develop many high-quality new products that are popularly received and to release those products in a timely manner, as well as to continue to extend the life of existing games by adding features and functionality that will encourage continued engagement with the game. If we are unable to continue to do so, it may negatively impact our business.

If we are unable to sustain traditional pricing levels for our products, our business could suffer materially.

        If we are unable to sustain traditional pricing levels for our console or PC titles or the associated downloadable content, whether due to competitive pressure, because retailers elect to price these products at a lower price or otherwise, it could have a negative impact on our business. Further, we make provisions for retail inventory price protection based upon certain assumed lowest prices and if competitive pressures force us to lower our prices below those levels, it could similarly have a negative impact on our business.

If we fail to successfully manage our new product development, or if we fail to anticipate the issues associated with that development, it may negatively impact our business.

        Our business models are evolving and we believe that our growth will depend, in part, upon our ability to successfully develop and sell new types of products, and to otherwise expand the methods by which we reach our consumers, including via digital distribution. Developing new products and distribution channels requires substantial up- front expenditures. Further, forecasting our revenues and profitability for these new business models is inherently uncertain and volatile. If such products or distribution channels do not achieve expected acceptance or generate sufficient revenues upon introduction, whether because of competition or otherwise, we may not recover the cost of our investments in developing and marketing those products and distribution channels, or recover the opportunity cost of diverting management and financial resources away from other products or distribution channels. In addition, expanding our business models will add complexity to our business and require us to effectively adapt our business and management processes to address the unique challenges and different requirements of any new areas in which we operate, which we may not be able to do, for lack of institutional expertise or otherwise.

Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and if we do not adapt to, and appropriately allocate our new resources among, emerging technologies and business models, our business may be negatively impacted.

        Technology changes rapidly in the interactive entertainment industry. We must continually anticipate and adapt our products to emerging technologies, delivery platforms and business models in order to stay competitive. When we choose to incorporate a new technology into a product or to develop a product for a new platform, operating system or media format, we often are required to make a substantial investment prior to the introduction of the product. If we invest in the development of interactive entertainment products incorporating a new technology or for a new platform that does


Table of Contents

not achieve significant commercial success, our revenues from those products likely will be lower than we anticipated and may not cover our development costs. Further, our competitors may adapt to an emerging technology or business model more quickly or effectively than we do, creating products that are technologically superior to ours, more appealing to consumers, or both. If, on the other hand, we elect not to pursue the development of products incorporating a new technology or for new platforms, or otherwise elect not to pursue a new business model, that achieves significant commercial success, it may have adverse consequences. It may take significant time and resources to shift product development resources to that technology, platform or business model, as the case may be, and may be more difficult to compete against existing products incorporating that technology or for that platform or against companies using that business model. For example, digital content delivery is increasingly important in our industry, requiring us to develop or acquire the expertise in such delivery method needed to remain competitive. Any failure to successfully adapt to, and appropriately allocate resources among, emerging technologies could negatively impact our business.

The increasing importance of digital sales to our business exposes us to the risks of that business model, including greater competition.

        The proportion of our revenues derived from digital content delivery, as compared to traditional retail sales, continues to increase. The increased importance of digital content delivery in our industry increases our potential competition, as the minimum capital needed to produce and publish a digitally delivered game, particularly a new game for mobile platforms, may be significantly less than that needed to produce and publish one that is purchased through retail distribution and is played on a game console. Shifting to digital delivery of our products also requires us to dedicate capital to developing and implementing alternative marketing strategies, which we may not do successfully. If any of this occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, a continuing shift to digital delivery could result in a deprioritization of our products by traditional retailers and distributors, giving rise to the same material adverse effects.

The increasing prevalence of free-to-play games exposes us to risks from that business model.

        We expect that the portion of the total revenues of the interactive entertainment industry, and of our revenues, generated by free-to-play entertainment products, which are monetized through in-game microtransactions rather than an up-front fee, will continue to increase, including as a result of the King Acquisition. We may invest in the development of free-to-play interactive entertainment products that do not achieve significant commercial success, in which case our revenues from those products likely will be lower than anticipated and we may not recover our development costs. Even if our free-to-play games are initially well-received, we may not be able to generate or sustain consumer engagement sufficient to generate significant revenues, if any, through in-game microtransactions. In addition, a continuing shift to free-to-play games could result in a deprioritization of our products by traditional retailers and distributors. Furthermore, as there are relatively low barriers to entry to developing free-to-play games, we expect new competitors to enter the market and existing competitors to allocate more resources to develop and market competing games.

If we are unable to successfully develop or market owned intellectual property, we may publish fewer successful games and our revenues may decline.

        Some of our products are based on intellectual property that we have developed internally or acquired from third parties. Consumers have historically preferred content which is part of an established franchise to content based on new intellectual property. If a new intellectual property does not gain consumer acceptance, whether because we are unable to successfully create consumer appeal and brand recognition or for other reasons, our business could be negatively impacted. Further, if the popularity of our owned intellectual property declines, we may have to write off the unrecovered


Table of Contents

portion of the underlying intellectual property assets, and revenues and operating income from these intellectual properties may decline quickly, either of which could negatively impact our business.

Competition within, and to, the interactive entertainment industry is intense, and competitors may succeed in reducing our sales.

        Within the interactive entertainment industry, we compete with other publishers of interactive entertainment software, both within the United States and, increasingly, in international jurisdictions. Our competitors include very large corporations with significantly greater financial, marketing and product development resources than we have. For example, integrated video game console hardware and software companies such as Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo, compete directly with us in the development of content for their respective platforms. A relatively small number of franchises account for a significant portion of revenues, and an even greater portion of profit, in the interactive entertainment industry, and the availability of significant financial resources is a major competitive factor in the production of high-quality products and in the marketing of products that are ultimately well-received. Our larger competitors may be able to leverage their greater financial, technical, personnel and other resources to finance larger budgets for development and marketing and make higher offers to licensors and developers for commercially desirable properties as well as adopt more aggressive pricing policies to develop more commercially successful video game products than we do. In addition, competitors with large product lines and popular games typically have greater leverage with retailers, distributors and other customers, who may be willing to promote products with less consumer appeal in return for access to those competitors' more popular games.

        Increased consumer acceptance and availability of interactive entertainment developed for use by consumers on handheld, mobile and tablet devices or social networking sites or other online games, consumer acceptance and availability of technology which allows users to play games on televisions without consoles, or technological advances in online game software or the Internet could result in a decline in sales of our platform-based software.

        Furthermore, as there are relatively low barriers to entry to developing mobile or online free-to-play or other casual games, we expect new competitors to enter the market and existing competitors to allocate more resources to develop and market competing games and applications. We compete, or will compete, with a vast number of small companies and individuals who are able to create and launch casual games and other content using relatively limited resources and with relatively limited start-up time or expertise. Competition for the attention of consumers on mobile devices is intense, as the number of applications on mobile devices has been increasing dramatically. This increased competition could negatively impact our business.

        Additionally, we compete with other forms of entertainment and leisure activities. For example, the overall growth in the use of the Internet and online services such as social networking sites by consumers may pose a competitive threat if consumers and potential consumers spend less of their available time using interactive entertainment software and more of their available time using the Internet, including those online services. Further, it is difficult to predict and prepare for rapid changes in consumer demand that could materially alter public preferences for different forms of entertainment and leisure activities. Failure to adequately identify and adapt to the competitive pressures described herein could negatively impact our business.

The development of high-quality products requires substantial up-front expenditures, and we may not be able to recover those costs for our future products.

        Consumer preferences for games are usually cyclical and difficult to predict, and even the most successful content remains popular for only limited periods of time, unless refreshed with new content or otherwise enhanced. In order to remain competitive, we must continuously develop new products or


Table of Contents

enhancements to existing products. The amount of lead time and cost involved in the development of high-quality products is increasing, and the longer the lead time involved in developing a product and the greater the allocation of financial resources to such product, the more critical it is that we accurately predict consumer demand for such product. If our future products do not achieve expected consumer acceptance or generate sufficient revenues upon introduction, we may not be able to recover the substantial development and marketing costs associated with those products.

We may overestimate demand for a product, incurring unrecoverable manufacturing costs.

        We pay a licensing fee to the console hardware manufacturer for each physical copy of a product manufactured for that manufacturer's game platform, regardless of whether that product is sold. If we overestimate demand and make too many physical "boxed" copies of any title, we will incur unrecoverable manufacturing costs for unsold units.

We are exposed to seasonality in the sale of our products.

        The interactive entertainment industry is highly seasonal, with the highest levels of consumer demand occurring during the year-end holiday buying season in the fourth quarter of the year. As a result, our sales have historically been highest during the second half of the year, particularly for our Activision segment. Receivables and credit risk are likewise higher during the second half of the year, as retailers increase their purchases of our products in anticipation of the holiday season. Delays in development, licensor approvals or manufacturing can affect the timing of the release of products, causing us to miss key selling periods such as the year-end holiday buying season.

If our proprietary online gaming service, Battle.net, does not function properly, our business may be negatively impacted.

        If Blizzard's proprietary online gaming service, Battle.net, does not function as anticipated, Blizzard's games may be completely unavailable or Blizzard may be prevented from delivering content digitally, which could result in a loss of sales for Blizzard's games. Further, any disruption in Battle.net's services could negatively impact our business.

We depend on servers to operate our games with online features, as well as Battle.net, our digital service with online features. If we were to lose server functionality, for any reason, our business may be negatively impacted.

        Our business relies on the continuous operation of servers which are owned and operated by third parties. Although we strive to maintain more than sufficient server capacity, and provide for active redundancy in the event of limited hardware failure, any broad-based catastrophic server malfunction, a significant service-disrupting attack or intrusion by hackers that circumvents security measures, a failure of disaster recovery service or the failure of a company on which we are relying for server capacity to provide that capacity for whatever reason would likely interrupt the availability or operation of Blizzard's games, and/or degrade or interrupt the functionality of other games of ours with online features, and could result in the loss of sales for, or in, such games (including subscription-based sales forWorld of Warcraft). This risk is particularly pronounced with respect to the mobile games published by King, which rely on a small number of third-party owned data centers located in Stockholm, Sweden. An extended interruption of service could negatively impact our business.

        We must project our future server needs and make advance purchases of servers or server capacity to accommodate expected business demands. If we underestimate the amount of server capacity our business requires or if our business were to grow more quickly than expected, our consumers may experience service problems, such as slow or interrupted gaming access. Insufficient server capacity


Table of Contents

could negatively impact our business. Conversely, if we overestimate the amount of server capacity required by our business, we may incur additional operating costs.

If any of the networks operated by third parties on which we sell digital content for our console games or the online third-party platforms on which we distribute our free-to-play games are unavailable for a prolonged period of time, our business could be negatively impacted.

        We rely on the networks operated by third parties, such as the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live, for the sale and digital delivery of downloadable console-game content. Similarly, we rely on the continued operation of the Apple App Store, the Google Play Store, and Facebook for the sale of virtual currency for our free-to-play games. In the event the efficient operation and functionality of these third-party networks or platforms is interrupted for a prolonged period of time, it could have a negative impact on our business.

We may not accurately predict the amount of Internet bandwidth or computational resources necessary to sustain our online gaming businesses.

        Our business is dependent on the availability of sufficient Internet bandwidth and computational resources. If the price of either such resource increases, we may not be able to increase our prices or subscriber levels to compensate for such costs. Because of the importance of our online business to our revenues and results of operations, our ability to access adequate bandwidth and online computational resources to support our business is critical.

        To secure access to such resources, we have entered into arrangements with several providers to secure future capacity, some of which involve long-term contracts. If the price of such resources were to decrease, our contractual commitments to pay higher prices could affect our ability to compete with other publishers of interactive software products paying lower prices. Further, because we purchase additional capacity based on anticipated growth, our capacity is sometimes larger than necessary to sustain our existing needs. If our projected online business growth is delayed or does not occur, we will incur larger expenses for such resources than necessary. Conversely, if we underestimate the amount of bandwidth that our online business requires, and our purchased capacity is insufficient to meet demand, our business may be negatively impacted.

We may be involved in legal proceedings that may result in material adverse outcomes.

        From time to time, we are involved in claims, suits, government investigations, audits and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of our business, including actions with respect to intellectual property, competition and antitrust matters, privacy matters, tax matters, labor and employment matters, unclaimed property matters, compliance and commercial claims. Such claims, suits, government investigations, audits and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty. Regardless of the outcome, such legal proceedings can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could result in substantial settlements, judgments, fines or penalties, criminal sanctions, consent decrees or orders preventing us from offering certain features, functionalities, products or services, requiring us to change our development process or other business practices.

We may be subject to intellectual property claims.

        As the number of interactive entertainment software products increases and the features and content of these products continue to overlap, software developers have increasingly become subject to infringement claims. Further, many of our products are highly realistic and feature materials that are based on real worldreal-world things or people, which may also be the subject of claims of infringement of the intellectual property


Table of Contents

infringement claims of others, including right of publicity, trademark, and unfair competition claims. In addition, our products often utilize complex, cutting-edge technology that may become subject to emerging intellectual property rightsclaims of others. Although we take steps to avoid knowingly violating the intellectual property rights of others, it is possible that third parties may still may claim infringement, particularly since there are an increasing number ofmany companies that focus their efforts exclusively on enforcing their patent rights.

        From time to time, we receive communications from third parties regarding such claims. Existing or future infringement claims against us, whether validmeritorious or not, may be time consuming, distracting to management and expensive to defend. Further, intellectual property litigation or claims could force us to do one or more of the following:

    cease selling, incorporating, supporting or using products or services that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;



    Table of Contents

      obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property, which, if available at all, may not be available on commercially favorable terms;

      redesign the affected interactive entertainment software products, which could result in additional costs, delay introduction and possibly reduce commercial appeal of the affected products; or

      pay damages to the holder of the infringed intellectual property for past infringements.

    Issues with the toys, accessories or hardware peripherals utilized in certain of our games may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities.

            We may experience issues with Skylanders toys and accessories or Guitar Hero hardware peripherals that may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities. Any of these activities could result in increased governmental scrutiny, harm to our reputation, reduced demand by consumers for our products, decreased willingness by our customers to purchase or by our partners to provide marketing support for those products, denial or increased cost for insurance coverage, or additional safety and testing requirements. Such results could divert development and management resources and increase legal fees and other costs, and otherwise could negatively impact our business.

    Our products may be subject to legal claims.

            In prior years, lawsuits have been filed against numerous interactive entertainment companies, including against Activision Blizzard, by the families of victims of violence, alleging that interactive entertainment products influence the behavior of the perpetrators of such violence. These lawsuits have been dismissed, but similar additional lawsuits may be filed in the future. Although our general liability insurance carrier has agreed to defend lawsuits of this nature with respect to the prior lawsuits, it is uncertain whether insurance carriers would do so in the future, or if such insurance carriers would cover all or any amounts for which we might be liable if such future lawsuits are not decided in our favor. Further, any such lawsuit could result in increased governmental scrutiny, harm to our reputation, reduced demand by consumers for our products, or decreased willingness by our customers to purchase or by our partners to provide marketing support for those products. Such results could divert development and management resources, increase legal fees and other costs and have other negative impacts on our business.


    Table of Contents

    Our products are subject to the threat of piracy and unauthorized copying, and inadequate intellectual property laws and other protections could prevent us from enforcing or defending our proprietary technologies. We may also face legal risks arising out of user-generateduser-generated content. Further, cheating, throughthe use of unauthorized "cheating""cheat" programs andor the use of other unauthorized software modifications by users could impact multiplayer gameplay or lead to reductions in microtransactions in our games.

            We regard our software as proprietary and rely on a variety of methods, including a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws and employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements, to protect our proprietary rights. We own or license various copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets. The process of registering and protecting these rights in various jurisdictions is expensive and time-consuming. Further, we are aware that some unauthorized copying occurs, and if a significantly greater amount of unauthorized copying of our software products were to occur, it could negatively impact our business.

            PolicingPiracy is a persistent problem for us, and policing the unauthorized sale, distribution and use of our products is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and software piracy (including online piracy) is a persistent problem for us.time-consuming. Further, the laws of some countries in which our products are, or may be, distributed either do not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, or are poorly enforced. Legal protection of our rights may be ineffective in such countries. In addition, though we take steps to make the unauthorized sale, distribution and use of our products more difficult and to otherwise enforce and police our rights, as do the manufacturers of consoles and the operators of other platforms on which many of our games are played, our efforts and the efforts of the console manufacturers and platform operators may not be successful in controlling the piracy of our products in all instances. Technology designed to circumvent the protection measures used by console manufacturers and platform operators or by us in our products, the increasing availability of broadband access to the Internet, the refusal of Internet service providers to remove infringing content in certain instances and the ability to download pirated copies of games from various Internet sites and peer-to-peer networks and Internet cafes using pirated copies of our products all have contributed tocould result in an expansion in piracy.

            In addition, unrelated third parties have developed, and may continue to develop, "cheating" programs or other unauthorized software tools and modifications that enable consumers to cheat in games such as those in our Candy Crush franchise, which could negatively impact the volume of microtransactions or purchases of downloadable content. In addition, vulnerabilities in the design of our applications and of the platforms upon which they run could be discovered after their release, which may result in lost revenue opportunities. This may lead to lost revenues from paying consumers or increased cost of developing technological measures to respond to these, either of which could negatively impact our business.

            We also cannot be certain that existing intellectual property laws will provide adequate protection for our products in connection with emerging technologies.

    We relyDue to our reliance on external developersthird-party platforms, platform providers are frequently able to develop some ofinfluence our software products.products and costs.

            We rely on externalGenerally, when we develop interactive entertainment software developers to develop some of our software products. Because we depend on these developers, weproducts for hardware platforms offered by Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo, the physical products are subject to the following risks:

      continuing strong demand for top-tier developers' resources, combined with the recognition they receive in connection withreplicated exclusively by that hardware manufacturer or their work, may cause developers who worked for us in the past either to work for a competitor in the future or to renegotiateapproved replicator. The agreements with us on terms less favorable to us;

      limited financial resources and business expertise and inability to retain skilled personnel may force developers out of business prior to completing products or require us to fund additional costs;
    these manufacturers include


    Table of Contents

      certain provisions, such as approval rights over all software products and related promotional materials and the ability to change the fee they charge for the manufacturing of products, which allow the hardware manufacturers substantial influence over the cost and the release schedule of such interactive entertainment software products. In addition, because each of the manufacturers is also a competitorpublisher of games for its own hardware platforms and manufactures products for all of its other licensees, a manufacturer may acquiregive priority to its own products or those of our competitors. Accordingly, Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo could cause unanticipated delays in the businessesrelease of key developers or sign them to exclusive development arrangements and, in either case, we would not be able to continue to engage such developers' services for our products, except foras well as increases to projected development, manufacturing, marketing or distribution costs, any period of time for which those developers are contractually obligated to complete development for us; and

      reliance on external developers reduces our visibility into, and control over, development schedules and operational outcomes compared to those when utilizing internal development resources.

            Increased competition for skilled third-party software developers also has compelled us to agree to make significant advance payments on royalties to game developers. If the products subject to these arrangements do not generate sufficient revenues to recover these royalty advances, we would have to write-off unrecovered portions of these payments, which could negatively impact our business. Typically,

            The platform providers also control the networks over which consumers purchase digital products and services for their platforms and through which we pay developers a royalty basedprovide online game capabilities for our console platform products. The control that the platform providers have over the fee structures and/or retail pricing for products and services for their platforms and online networks could impact the volume of purchases of our products made over their networks and our profitability. With respect to certain downloadable content and microtransactions, the networks provided by these platform providers are the exclusive means of selling and distributing this content. Further, increased competition for limited premium "digital shelf space" has placed the platform providers in an increasingly better position to negotiate favorable terms of sale. If the platform provider establishes terms that restrict our offerings on a percentageits platform, or significantly impact the financial terms on which these products or services are offered to our customers, or does not renew our license or approve the inclusion of netonline capabilities in our console products, our business could be negatively impacted.

            We also derive significant revenues from product sales, less agreed upon deductions, but from timethe distribution of free-to-play games on third-party mobile and web platforms such as the Apple App Store, the Google Play Store, and Facebook, and most of the virtual currency we sell is purchased using the payment processing systems of these platform providers. These platforms also serve as significant online distribution platforms for our games. If these platforms modify their current discovery mechanisms, communication channels available to time, we have agreeddevelopers, operating systems, terms of service or other policies (including fees), or they develop their own competitive offerings, our business could be negatively impacted. Further, if these platform providers are required to paychange how they label free-to-play games or take payment for in-app purchases or change how the personal information of consumers is made available to developers, fixed per unit product royalties after royalty advances are fully recouped. To the extent that sales prices of products on which we have agreed to pay a fixed per unit royalty are marked down, itour business could be negatively impact our business.impacted.

    Our sales may decline substantially without warningbusiness is highly dependent on the success and in a brief periodavailability of time becausevideo game platforms manufactured by third parties, as well as our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms.

            We derive a substantial portion of our sales are made to a relatively small number of key customers and because we do not have long-term contracts forrevenues from the sale of products for play on video game platforms manufactured by third parties, such as Sony's PS4, Microsoft's Xbox One, and Nintendo's Wii U and Switch. For example, sales of products for consoles accounted for 34% of our products.consolidated net revenues in 2017. The success of our console business is driven in large part by our ability to accurately predict which platforms will be successful in the marketplace and our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms. We also rely on the availability of an adequate supply of these video game consoles and the continued support for these consoles by their manufacturers. We must make product development decisions and commit significant resources well in advance of the anticipated introduction of a new platform, and development costs for new console platforms may be greater than those costs for the then-current console platforms. If increased costs are not offset by higher revenues and other cost efficiencies, our business could be negatively impacted. If the platforms for which we develop new software products or modify existing products do not attain significant market acceptance, we may not be able to recover our development costs, which could be significant.


    Table of Contents

    The importance of retail sales to our business exposes us to the risks of that business model.

            In the United States and Canada, our "boxed" products are often sold on a direct basis to mass-market retailers, consumer electronics stores, discount warehouses and game specialty stores. Our "boxed" products are sold internationally on a direct-to-retail basis, through third-party distribution and licensing arrangements, and through our wholly-owned European distribution subsidiaries. Our sales are made primarily on a purchase order basis without long-term agreements or other forms of commitments, and our retail customers and distributors have generally been reducing the levels of inventory they are willing to carry. The loss of, or significant reduction in sales to, any of Activision's principal retail customers or distributors could have adverse consequences. TheIn addition, having such a large portion of our retail total net revenues concentrated in a few customers reduces our negotiating leverage with these customers.

            Further, the concentration of sales in a small number of large customers also makes us more vulnerable to collection risk if one or more of these large customers becomes unable to pay for our products or seeks protection under the bankruptcy laws. In addition, having such a large portion of our total net revenues concentrated in a few customers reduces our negotiating leverage with these customers.

    Our business may be harmed if our distributors, retailers, development and licensing partners, or other parties with whom we do business become unable to honor their existing financial obligations to us or seek protection under the bankruptcy laws.

            Some of our business partners are highly-leveraged or small businesses that may be particularly vulnerable to difficult economic conditions. As a result of current economic conditions in some parts of the world, we are subject to heightened counterparty risks, including the risks that our business partners may default on their obligations to us or seek protection under the bankruptcy laws.

            For example, retailersRetailers and distributors in the interactive entertainment industry have from time to time experienced significant fluctuations in their businesses and a number of them have failed. We typically make sales to most retailers and some distributors on unsecured credit, with terms that vary depending upon the customer's credit history, solvency, credit limits and sales history, as well as prevailing terms with similarly situated customers and whether sufficient credit insurance can be obtained. Challenging economic conditions may impair the ability of our customers to pay for products they have purchased and, as a result, our reserves for doubtful accounts and write-off of accounts receivable could increase and, even if increased, may turn out to be insufficient. Moreover, even in


    Table of Contents

    cases where we have insolvency risk insurance to protect against a customer's bankruptcy, insolvency or liquidation, this insurance typically contains a significant deductible and co-payment obligation, and does not cover all instances of non-payment. Further, the insolvency or business failure of other types of business partners could result in disruptions to the manufacturing or distribution of our products or the cancellation of contractual arrangements that we consider to be favorable. A payment default by, or the insolvency or business failure of, a significant business partner could negatively impact our business.

    Our business may be harmed if our distributors, retailers, development and licensing partners, or other parties with whom we do business act in ways that place our brand at risk.

            The actions        Moreover, the importance of our business partners may put our business and our reputation at risk. In many cases, these third parties are given access to sensitive and proprietary information in order to provide services and support our team. These third parties may misappropriate our information and engage in unauthorized use of it. The failure of these third parties to provide adequate services and technologies, or the failure of third parties to adequately maintain or update their services and technologies, could result in a disruptionretail sales to our business operations,exposes us to the risk of product returns and price protection with respect to our distributors and retailers. In some cases, return policies allow distributors and retailers to return defective, shelf-worn, damaged and certain other products in accordance with terms granted. Price protection, when granted and applicable, allows these distributors and retailers a credit against amounts owed with respect to merchandise unsold by them. We may permit product returns from, or grant price protection to, distributors and retail customers who meet certain conditions. These conditions may include compliance with applicable payment terms, delivery of weekly inventory and sales information and consistent participation in the launches of premium title releases. We may also consider other factors, including the facilitation of slow-moving inventory and other industry factors. Activision also offers a 90-day limited warranty to end users that Activision products will be free from manufacturing defects. Although we maintain a reserve for returns and price protection, and although we may place limits on product returns and price protection, we could be forced to accept substantial product returns and provide substantial price protection to maintain our relationships with retailers and our access to distribution channels. We face similar issues and risks, including exposure to risk of chargebacks, with respect to end users to whom we sell products directly, whether through our proprietary online gaming service or otherwise.

            Further, retailers typically have a limited amount of shelf space and promotional resources, and there is intense competition for high-quality retail shelf space and promotional support from retailers. Competition for shelf space may intensify and may negativelyrequire us to increase our marketing expenditures. Retailers with limited shelf space typically devote the most and highest quality shelf space to those products expected to be best sellers. We cannot be certain that our new products will consistently achieve such "best seller" status. Due to increased competition for limited shelf space, retailers and distributors are in an increasingly better position to negotiate favorable terms of sale, including price discounts, price protection, marketing and display fees and product return policies. Our products


    Table of Contents

    constitute a relatively small percentage of most retailers' sales volume. We cannot be certain that retailers will continue to purchase our products or provide those products with adequate levels of shelf space and promotional support on acceptable terms.

            Additionally, we make provisions for retail inventory price protection based upon certain assumed lowest prices and if competitive pressures force us to lower our prices below those levels, it could similarly have a negative impact on our business. Further, because we pay a licensing fee to the console hardware manufacturer for each physical copy of a product manufactured for that manufacturer's game platform regardless of whether that product is actually sold, if we overestimate demand and make too many physical "boxed" copies of any title, we will incur unrecoverable manufacturing costs for unsold units.

    Our business isWe are a global company and are subject to the risks and uncertainties of international trade.conducting business outside the U.S.

            We conduct business throughout the world, and we derive a substantial amount of our revenues and profits from international trade, particularly from Europe, Asia and Australia. WeMoving forward, we expect that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenues and profits in the future and, moreover, that sales in emerging markets in Asia and elsewhere will be an increasingly important part of our international sales.

    As such, we are, and may be increasingly, subject to risks inherent in foreign trade generally, as well as risks inherent in doing business in emerging markets, including increased tariffs and duties, compliance with economic sanctions, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, shipping delays, increases in transportation costs, international political, regulatory and economic developments, unexpected changes to laws, regulatory requirements and enforcement on us and our platform partners and differing local business practices, all of which may impact operatingprofit margins or make it more difficult, if not impossible, for us to conduct business in foreign markets.

            A deterioration in relations between either us or the United States and any country in which we have significant operations or sales, or the implementation of government regulations in such a country, including China in particular, could result in the adoption or expansion of trade restrictions, including economic sanctions, that could have a material adverse effectnegative impact on our business. For instance, to operate in China, all games must have regulatory approval. A decision by the Chinese government to revoke its approval for any of our games or to decline to approve any products we desire to sell in China in the future could have a material adverse effectnegative impact on our business. Additionally, in the past, legislation has been implemented in China that has required modifications to our software. The future implementation of similar laws or regulations in China or any other country in which we have operations or sales may restrict or prohibit the sale of our products or may require engineering modifications to our products that are not cost-effective, if even feasible at all, or could degrade the consumer experience to the point where consumers cease to purchase such products. Further, the enforcement of regulation of mobile and other games with an online element in China remains uncertain, and further changes, either in the regulations or their enforcement, could have a materialnegative impact on our business in China.

            We are also subject to risks that our operations outside the United States could be conducted by our employees, contractors, third-party partners, representatives or agents in ways that violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Anti-Bribery Act or other similar anti-bribery laws, as well as the 2017 U.K. Criminal Finances Act or other similar financial crime laws. While we have policies and procedures, as well as training for our employees, intended to secure compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors, third-party partners, representatives or agents may take actions


    Table of Contents

    that violate our policies. Moreover, it may be more difficult to oversee the conduct of any such persons who are not our employees, potentially exposing us to greater risk from their actions.

            Additionally, in June 2016, voters in the United Kingdom approved an advisory referendum to withdraw from the European Union (the "E.U."), commonly referred to as "Brexit." The United


    Table of Contents

    Kingdom commenced withdrawal proceedings with the E.U. in March 2017. These proceedings have created political and economic uncertainty, particularly in the United Kingdom and the E.U., and this uncertainty may persist for years. The uncertainty surrounding the terms of the United Kingdom's withdrawal and its consequences could adversely impact consumer and investor confidence and the level of sales of discretionary items, including our products. Any of these effects could negatively impact our business.

            In addition, cultural differences may affect consumer preferences and limit the international popularity of games that are popular in the U.S, or require us to modify the content of the games or the method by which we charge our customers for the games in order to be successful. If we do not correctly assess consumer preferences in the countries in which we sell our products, or if the other risks discussed herein come to fruition, it could negatively impact our business.

    Changes in tax rates or exposure to additional tax liabilities could have a material adverse effect onnegatively impact our business.

            We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in various other jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes, and inIn the ordinary course of business there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate income tax determination is uncertain. We areSignificant judgment is required to estimate future taxes.in determining our worldwide income tax provision. Although we currently believe our income tax estimates are reasonable, the estimation process is inherently uncertain,ultimate outcomes may have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

            Our income tax liability and such estimates are not binding on tax authorities. Further, our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including changes in our business, including the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in tax elections, andlaws or tax rulings, changes in applicableinterpretations of existing laws, or developments in tax laws. Additionally,examinations or investigations. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations or require us to change the manner in which we operate our business. The tax determinationsregimes we are regularly subject to audit byor operate under are unsettled and may be subject to significant change. The E.U. and its member states, and a number of other countries are actively pursuing fundamental changes to the tax laws applicable to multinational companies like us. Furthermore, tax authorities and developments in those audits could adversely affectmay choose to examine or investigate our tax reporting or tax liability, including under transfer pricing or permanent establishment theories. These proceedings may lead to adjustments or proposed adjustments to our income taxes or provisions for uncertain tax provision. Should the ultimate tax liability exceed estimates, our income tax provision and net income could be materially adversely affected.positions.

            We earn a significant amount of our operating income,On December 22, 2017, tax reform legislation known as the Tax Cuts and hold a significant portion of our cash and investments, outsideJobs Act (the "U.S. Tax Reform Act") was enacted in the United States. WhileThe U.S. Tax Reform Act introduces significant changes to U.S. income tax law that will have a meaningful impact on our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outsidefinancial position and effective tax rate. Accounting for the income tax effects of the United States,U.S. Tax Reform Act requires complex new calculations to be performed and significant judgments in interpreting the legislation. Additional guidance may be issued on how the provisions of the U.S. Tax Reform Act will be applied or otherwise administered that is different from our interpretation. Due to the timing of enactment and the complexity in determining the income tax effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, we made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. We may make adjustments to the provisional amounts as we collect and prepare the data necessary to finalize our calculations, interpret the U.S. Tax Reform Act and any repatriationadditional guidance issued, and consider the effects of funds currently held in foreign jurisdictions would likelyany additional actions we may take as a result in higherof the U.S. Tax Reform Act. These adjustments could materially affect our financial position and results of operations as well as our effective tax ratesrate in the period in which these adjustments are made.

            In late 2017, we received a Notice of Reassessment from the French Tax Authority ("FTA") related to transfer pricing concerning intercompany transactions involving one of our French subsidiaries for the Company.2011 through 2013 tax years. We disagree with the proposed assessment and intend to vigorously


    Table of Contents

    contest it. We plan to pursue all remedies available to us to successfully resolve this matter, including administrative remedies with the FTA, and judicial remedies, if necessary. While we believe our tax provisions at December 31, 2017 are appropriate, until such time as this matter is ultimately resolved we could be subject to significant additional tax liabilities. In addition there have been proposals to change U.S.the risk of additional tax laws that would significantly impact how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings. Althoughfor years 2011 through 2013, if litigation regarding this matter were adversely determined and/or if the FTA were to seek adjustments of a similar nature for subsequent years, we cannot predict whether, or in what form, this proposed legislation will pass, if enacted it could negatively impact our business.be subject to significant additional tax liabilities.

            We are also required to pay taxes other than income taxes, such as payroll, sales, use, value-added, net worth, property, and goods and services taxes, in both the United States and various other jurisdictions. Tax authorities regularly examine these non-income taxes. The outcomes from these examinations, changes in the business, changes in applicable tax rules or other tax matters may have a material adverse effectnegative impact on our business.

    Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a material adverse effect oncould negatively impact our business.

            We transact business in various currencies other than the U.S. dollar and have significant international sales and expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, subjecting us to currency exchange rate risks. A substantial portion of our international sales and expenses are denominated in local currencies, including the euro,euros, British pound,pounds, Australian dollar,dollars, South Korean won, Chinese renminbi,yuan, and Swedish krona, and Korean won, which could fluctuate against the U.S. dollar. Since we have significant international sales, but incur the majority of our costs in the United States, the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, may have an asymmetric and disproportional impact on our business. We have, in the past, utilized currency derivative contracts to hedge certain foreign exchange exposures with hedge maturities of generally less than 12 months, and managed these exposures with natural offsets. However, there can be no assurance that we will continue our hedging programs, or that we will be successful in managing exposure to currency exchange rate risks whether or not we do so.


    Table of Contents

    Our reported financial results could be adversely affected by changes in financial accounting standards or by the application of existing or future accounting standards to our business as it evolves.

            Our reported financial results are impacted by the accounting policies promulgated by the SEC and national accounting standards bodies and the methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies. Policies affecting revenue recognition have and could further significantly affect the way we report revenues related to our products and services. We recognize a majority of the revenues from bundled sales (i.e., packaged goods video games that include an online service component) on a deferred basis over an estimated service period for such games. In addition, we defer the costs of sales of those products. We expect that an increasing number of our games will be online-enabled in the future and that we could be required to recognize the related revenues over a period of time rather than at the time of sale. Further, as we increase our downloadable content and add new features to our online services, our estimate of the service period may change and we could be required to recognize revenues, and defer related costs, over a shorter or longer period of time. As we enhance, expand and diversify our business and product offerings, the application of existing or future financial accounting standards, particularly those relating to the way we account for revenues and taxes, could have an adverse effect on our reported net revenues, net income and earnings per share under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in any given period.

    Certain of our key operating metrics are subject to inherent challenges in measurement, and real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business.

            We track certain key operating metrics using internal tools, which have certain limitations. In addition, we rely on data received from third parties, including third-party platforms, to track certain performance indicators. We only have a limited ability to verify data from bothscrutiny regarding the appropriateness of these sources.

            Our methodologies for tracking metrics may also change over time, which could result in changes to the metrics we report.their content. If we undercount or overcount performance duefail to the internal tools we use or issues with the data received from third parties,receive our target ratings for certain titles, or if our internal tools contain errors, the data we report may not be accurate or comparable with prior periods. In addition, limitations, changes or errors with respectretailers refuse to how we measure data may affect our understanding of certain details of our business, which could affect our longer term strategies. If our performance metrics are not accurate representations of our financial or operational performance, if we discover material inaccuracies in our metrics, or if we can no longer calculate any of our key performance metrics with a sufficient degree of accuracy and cannot find an adequate replacement for the metric, our business could be negatively impacted.

    We may permit our customerssell such titles due to return products and to receive pricing concessions which could negatively impact our business.

            We are exposed to the risk of product returns and price protection with respect to our distributors and retailers. In some cases, return policies allow distributors and retailers to return defective, shelf-worn, damaged and certain other products in accordance with terms granted. Price protection, when granted and applicable, allows these distributors and retailers a credit against amounts owed with respect to merchandise unsold by them. We may permit product returns from, or grant price protection to, our customers under certain conditions. These conditions may include compliance with applicable payment terms, delivery of weekly inventory and sales information and consistent participation in the launches of premium title releases. We may also consider other factors, including the facilitation of slow-moving inventory and other industry factors. When we offer price protection, it may be offered with respect to a particular product to all of our distributors and retailer customers who meet the applicable conditions. Activision also offers a 90-day limited warranty to its consumer end users that Activision products will be free from manufacturing defects. Although we maintain a reserve for returns and price protection, and although we may place limits on product returns and price protection, we


    Table of Contents

    could be forced to accept substantial product returns and provide substantial price protection to maintain our relationships with retailers and our access to distribution channels. We face similar issues and risks, including exposure to risk of chargebacks, with respect to consumer end users to whom we sell products directly, whether through Battle.net or otherwise.

    We may face difficulty obtaining access to the retail shelf space necessary to market and sell our products effectively.

            Retailers typically have a limited amount of shelf space and promotional resources, and there is intense competition among consumer interactive entertainment software products for high-quality retail shelf space and promotional support from retailers. To the extent that the number of products and platforms increase, competition for shelf space may intensify and may require us to increase our marketing expenditures. Those issues are exacerbated to the extent any of our products involve physical goods in addition to software and, as such, require additional shelf space, like the titles in our Skylanders franchise, which include both action figures and accessories, as well as an electronic "portal", and the title in our Guitar Hero franchise, which includes a "life sized" guitar-shaped controller. Retailers with limited shelf space typically devote the most and highest quality shelf space to those products expectedwhat they perceive to be best sellers. We cannot be certain that our new products will consistently achieve such "best seller" status. Due to increased competition for limited shelf space, retailers and distributors are in an increasingly better position to negotiate favorable terms of sale, including price discounts, price protection, marketing and display fees and product return policies. Our products constitute a relatively small percentage of most retailers' sales volume. We cannot be certain that retailers will continue to purchase our products or provide those products with adequate levels of shelf space and promotional support on acceptable terms.

    If our marketing and advertising efforts fail to resonate with our consumers, our business could be negatively impacted.

            Our products are marketed worldwide through a diverse spectrum of advertising and promotional programs. Our ability to sell our products and services is dependent in part upon the success of these programs. If the marketing for our products and services fails to resonate with our consumers, particularly during the critical holiday season or during other key selling periods, or advertising rates or other media placement costs increase, or if the use of cost-effective cross-promotion within our mobile games to retain consumers becomes less effective, these factorsobjectionable content, it could have a negative impact on our business.

    Increased sales of used interactive entertainment products could lower our sales.

            Certain of our larger customers sell used interactive entertainment products, which are generally priced lower than new interactive entertainment productsOur console and do not result in any revenues to the publisher of the games. Sales of used interactive entertainment products could negatively affect our sales of new products.

    OurPC games are subject to ratings includingby the rating systems of the Entertainment Software Rating Board in the U.S. and similar agencies in international jurisdictions. Our failure to obtain our target ratings for our products could negatively impact our business.

            The Entertainment Software Rating Board (the "ESRB") is, a self-regulatory body based in the United StatesU.S. that provides U.S. and Canadian consumers of interactive entertainment software with ratings information, including information on the content in such software, such as violence, nudity or sexual content, contained in software products. The ESRB rating categories are "Early Childhood" (i.e.,along with an assessment of the suitability of the content is intended for young children), "Everyone" (i.e., content is generally suitable for all ages), "Everyone 10+" (i.e., content is generally suitable for ages 10 and up), "Teen" (i.e., content is generally


    Table of Contents

    suitable for ages 13 and up), "Mature" (i.e., content is generally suitable for ages 17 and up) and "Adults Only" (i.e., content is suitable for adults ages 18 and up). Our console and PC games are subject to ratings by the ESRB and some of our most significant titles have received a "Mature" rating, inherently limiting the target audience.certain age groups. Certain countries other than the United Statescountries have also established content rating systems as prerequisites for product sales in those countries. CertainIn addition, certain stores use other ratings systems, such as Apple's Appuse of its proprietary "App Rating SystemSystem" and Google Play's use of the International Age Rating Coalition (IARC) rating system. If we are unable to obtain the ratings we have targeted for our products, it could have a negative impact on our business. In some instances, a companywe may be required to modify itsour products to comply with the requirements of the rating systems, which could delay or disrupt the release of any given product, or may prevent its sale altogether in certain territories. Further, if an agency re-rates one of our games is "re-rated" for any reason, a ratings organization could require corrective actions, which could include a recall, retailers could refuse to sell it and demand that we accept the return of any unsold or returned copies or consumers could demand a refund for copies previously purchased. If we are unable to obtain the ratings we have targeted for our products, it could have a negative impact on our business.

    Additional content-related policies adopted by retailers could negatively affect sales of our products.

            RetailersAdditionally, retailers may decline to sell interactive entertainment software containing what they judge to be graphic violence or sexually explicit material or other content that they deem inappropriate for their businesses, whether because a product received a certain rating by the ESRB or other content rating system, or otherwise. If retailers decline to sell our products based upon their opinion that they contain objectionable themes, graphic violence or sexually explicit material or other generally


    Table of Contents

    objectionable content, we might be required to modify particular titles or forfeit the revenue opportunity of selling such titles with that retailer.

    Our business, products, and distribution are subject to increasing regulation in key territories. If we do not successfully respond to these regulations, our business could be materially adversely affected.

            Legislation is continually being introduced, and litigation and regulatory enforcement actions are taking place, that may affect the way in which we, and other industry participants, may offer content and features, and distribute and advertise our products. Many foreign countries, such as China and Germany, have laws that permit governmental entities to restrict or prohibit marketing or distribution of interactive entertainment software products because of the content therein (and similar legislation has been introduced at one time or another at the federal and state levels in the United States).        Further, the growth and development of electronic commerce and virtual items and currency may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on or limitations on operations of companies such as ours conducting business through the Internet and mobile devices. We are also subject to laws and regulations related to protection of minors, consumer privacy, advertising, taxation, payments, intellectual property, distribution, and antitrust, among others. Furthermore, existing laws or new laws regarding the marketing of in-app purchases, regulation of currency, banking institutions, unclaimed property, and money laundering may be interpreted to cover virtual currency or goods. The adoption and enforcement of legislation which restricts the marketing, content, business model, or sales of our products in countries in which we do business may harm the sales of our products, as the products we are able to offer to our customers and the size of the potential market for our products may be limited. We may be required to modify certain product development processes or products or alter our marketing strategies to comply with such regulations, which could be costly or delay the release of our products. The laws and regulations affecting our products vary by territory and may be inconsistent with one another, imposing conflicting or uncertain restrictions. Failure to comply with any applicable legislation may also result in government-imposed fines or other penalties, as well as harm to our reputation. Moreover, the public dialogue concerning interactive entertainment may have an adverse impact on our reputation and consumers' willingness to purchase our products. The King Acquisition has significantly increased our user population, and may


    Table of Contents

    subject us to laws and regulations in additional jurisdictions and exacerbate the potential adverse impact on our business.

            Although we have structured and operate our skill tournaments with applicable laws in mind, including any applicable laws relating to gambling, and believe that playing these games does not constitute gambling, our skill tournaments could in the future become subject to gambling-related rules and regulations and expose us to civil and criminal penalties. We also sometimes offer consumers of our online and casual games various types of contests and promotional opportunities. We are subject to laws in a number of jurisdictions concerning the operation and offering of such activities and games, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. If these were to occur, we might be required to seek licenses, authorizations, or approvals from relevant regulators, the granting of which may be dependent on us meeting certain capital and other requirements, and we may be subject to additional regulation and oversight, such as reporting to regulators, all of which could significantly increase our operating costs. Changes in current laws or regulations or the imposition of new laws and regulations in the United States, Europe, or elsewhere regarding these activities may lessen the growth of casual game services and impair our business.

    The laws and regulations concerning data privacy are continually evolving. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could harm our business.

            Consumers can play certain of our games online using third-party platforms and networks and on mobile devices. We collect and store significant amounts of information about our consumers of these games—both personally identifying and non-personally identifying information. We are subject to laws from a variety of jurisdictions regarding privacy and the protection of this information. For example, the European Union (the "E.U.") has traditionally taken a broader view than the United States and certain other jurisdictions as to what is considered personal information and has imposed greater obligations under data privacy regulations. The U.S. Children's Online Privacy Protection Act ("COPPA") also regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information from children under 13 years of age. Failure to comply with COPPA may increase our costs, subject us to expensive and distracting government investigations, and result in substantial fines.

            Data privacy protection laws are rapidly changing and likely will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, which could impact our approach to operating and marketing our games. For example, the Court of Justice of the European Union's recent decision to invalidate the E.U.-U.S. Safe Harbor regime that legitimized the transfer of personal data from the E.U. to the U.S. was a material change to laws on data privacy applicable to our business. The European Commission and the U.S. government have recently agreed to a new framework for transatlantic data flows known as the "E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield," which is intended to replace the Safe Harbor regime, but the details of how this will operate in practice and the compliance implications for our business are not yet clear. The U.S. government, including the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce, is continuing to review the need for greater regulation over the collection of personal information and information about consumer behavior on the Internet and on mobile devices, and the E.U. has proposed reforms to its existing data protection legal framework. Various government and consumer agencies worldwide have also called for new regulation and changes in industry practices. In addition, in some cases, we are dependent upon our platform providers to solicit, collect and provide us with information regarding our consumers that is necessary for compliance with these various types of regulations.

            Player interaction with our games is subject to our privacy policy, end user license agreements, and terms of service. If we fail to comply with our posted privacy policy, EULAs, or terms of service, or if we fail to comply with existing privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations, it could result in proceedings or litigation against us by governmental authorities or others, which could result in fines or judgments against us, damage our reputation, impact our financial condition and harm our business. If


    Table of Contents

    regulators, the media, or consumers raise any concerns about our privacy and data protection or consumer protection practices, even if unfounded, this could also result in fines or judgments against us, damage our reputation, negatively impact our financial condition, and damage our business.

    We may not be able to maintain our distribution relationships with key vendors and customers.

            We have subsidiaries that distribute interactive entertainment software and hardware products and provide related services in Germany and the United Kingdom, respectively, and via export in other European countries for a variety of entertainment software publishers, many of which are our competitors, and hardware manufacturers. From time to time, these subsidiaries also maintain exclusive relationships to serve certain retail customers. These services are generally performed subject to limited-term arrangements. Although we expect to use reasonable efforts to retain these vendors and retail customer relationships, we may not be successful in this regard. The cancellation or non-renewal of one or more of these arrangements could negatively impact our business.

    Credit card or other fraud could have a material adverse effect on our business.

            A substantial portion of the subscription revenues generated byWorld of Warcraft, as well as revenues generated from other sales through Battle.net, are paid by subscribers using credit cards. At times, there may be attempts to use fraudulently obtained credit card numbers to pay for our products and services. Additionally, the credit card numbers and other sensitive or personally identifiable information ofWorld of Warcraft's subscribers and Battle.net account holders are maintained in a proprietary database that may be subject to malicious intrusion by hackers or otherwise compromised internally or externally. As fraudulent schemes become more sophisticated, it may become more difficult and more costly for us to detect credit card or other fraud and we may be required to incur costs to implement additional security measures to protect subscriber information. An increase in credit card or other fraud could have adverse consequences. In addition, we may be subject to legal claims or legal proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, if there is loss, disclosure or misappropriation of or access to our customers' credit card or other sensitive or personally identifiable information.

    Data breaches involving the source code for our products or customer, consumer or employee data stored by us, or by a third party operating on our behalf, could negatively impact our business.

            In the course of our day-to-day business, we and third parties operating on our behalf create, store and/or use commercially sensitive information, such as the source code and game assets for our interactive entertainment software products and confidential information with respect to our customers, consumers and employees. A malicious intrusion by hackers or other breach of the systems on which such source code and assets, account information (including personally identifiable information) and other sensitive data is stored could lead to piracy of our software, fraudulent activity, disclosure or misappropriation of, or access to, our customers', consumers' or employees' personally identifiable information or our own sensitive business data. A data intrusion into a server for a game with online features or for Battle.net could also disrupt the operation of such game or platform. If we are subject to data security breaches, or a security-related incident which materially disrupts the availability of our products and services, we may have a loss in sales or subscriptions or be forced to pay damages or incur other costs, including from the implementation of additional security measures, or suffer reputational damage. Moreover, even if there were a public perception that our data protection measures are inadequate, whether or not the case, it could result in reputational damage and potential harm to our business relationships or the public perception of our business model. In addition, we may be subject to legal claims or proceedings in connection with data security breaches, including regulatory investigations and actions.


    Table of Contents

    We rely on complex information technology systems and networks to operate our business. Any significant system or network disruption could negatively impact our business.

            We rely on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of complex information technology systems and networks, some of which are within Activision Blizzard and some of which are managed and/or hosted by third-party providers. All information technology systems and networks are potentially vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, including but not limited to cyber- attacks, malicious software, security breach, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. We may also face sophisticated attacks, referred to as advanced persistent threats, which are cyber-attacks aimed at compromising our intellectual property and other commercially-sensitive information, such as the source code and game assets for our software or confidential customer or employee information, which remain undetected for prolonged periods of time. Information technology system or network failure or security breach could negatively impact our business continuity, operations and financial results. These risks extend to the networks and e-commerce sites of console platform providers and other partners who sell and host our content online. We may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions or security breaches.

    Our results of operations or reputation may be harmed as a result of offensive consumer-created content.

            We are subject to risks associated with the collaborative online features in our games which allow consumers to post narrative comments, in real time, that are visible to other consumers. From time to time, objectionable and offensive consumer content may be posted to a gaming or other site with online chat features or game forums which allow consumers to post comments. We may be subject to lawsuits, governmental regulation or restrictions, and consumer backlash (including decreased sales and harmed reputation), as a result of consumers posting offensive content. We may also be subject to consumer backlash from comments made in response to postings we make on social media sites such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.

    If one or more of our titles were found to contain objectionable undisclosed content, our business may be negatively impacted.

            Throughoutthroughout the history of the interactive entertainment industry, many interactive software products have included hidden content and/or hidden gameplay features, some of which have been accessible through the use of in-game codes or other technological means, that are intended to enhance the gameplay experience. In some cases, such undisclosed content or features have been considered to be objectionable. While publishers are required to disclose pertinent hidden content during the ESRB ratings process, in a few cases, publishers have failed to disclose hidden content, and the ESRB has required the recall of the game, changed the rating or associated content descriptors originally assigned to the product, required the publisher to change the game or game packaging and/or imposed fines on the publisher. Retailers have on occasion reacted to the discovery of such undisclosed content by removing these games from their shelves, refusing to sell them and demanding that their publishers accept them as product returns. Likewise, some interactive entertainment software consumers have reacted to the revelation of undisclosed content by refusing to purchase such games, demanding refunds for games they have already purchased, refraining from buying other games published by the company whose game contained the objectionable material, and, on at least one occasion, filing a lawsuit against the publisher of the product containing such content.

            We have implemented preventive measures designed to reduce the possibility of objectionable undisclosed content from appearing in the interactive software products we publish. Nonetheless, these preventive measures are subject to human error, circumvention, overriding and reasonable resource constraints. If an interactive software product we publish is found to contain undisclosed content, we could be subject to any of these consequences.

    Our business, products, and distribution are subject to increasing regulation in key territories. If we do not successfully respond to these regulations, our business could be negatively impacted.

            Legislation is continually being introduced, and litigation and regulatory enforcement actions are taking place, that may affect the way in which we, and other industry participants, may offer content and features, and distribute and advertise our products. The video game industry continues to evolve, and new and innovative business opportunities are often subject to new attempts at regulation. Many foreign countries, such as China and Germany, have laws that permit governmental entities to restrict or prohibit marketing or distribution of interactive entertainment software products because of the content therein (and similar legislation has been introduced at one time or another at the federal and state levels in the United States). Further, the growth and development of electronic commerce and virtual items and currency may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens or limitations on operations of companies such as ours conducting business through the Internet and mobile devices. We are subject to laws and regulations related to protection of minors, consumer privacy, accessibility, advertising, taxation, payments, intellectual property, distribution, and antitrust, among others. Also, existing laws or new laws regarding the marketing of in-app purchases, regulation of currency, banking institutions, virtual currencies, unclaimed property, and money laundering may be interpreted to cover virtual currency or goods. Furthermore, the growth and development of electronic commerce and virtual items and currency may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens or limitations on operations of companies such as ours conducting business through the Internet and mobile devices. The adoption and enforcement of legislation that restricts the marketing, content, business model, or sales of our products in countries in which we do business may harm the sales of our products, as the products we are able to offer to our customers and the size of the potential market for our products may be limited. We may be required to modify certain product development processes or products or alter our marketing strategies to comply with regulations, which could be costly or delay the release of our products. The laws and regulations affecting our products vary by territory and may be inconsistent with one another,


    Table of Contents

    imposing conflicting or uncertain restrictions. Failure to comply with any applicable legislation may also result in government-imposed fines or other penalties, as well as harm to our reputation. Moreover, the public dialogue concerning interactive entertainment may have an adverse impact on our reputation and consumers' willingness to purchase our products. Because the King Acquisition has significantly increased our user population, it may subject us to laws and regulations in additional jurisdictions and exacerbate the potential adverse impact on our business.

            Although we have structured and operate our skill tournaments with applicable laws in mind, including any applicable laws relating to gambling, and believe that playing these games does not constitute gambling, our skill tournaments could in the future become subject to gambling-related rules and regulations and expose us to civil and criminal penalties. We also sometimes offer consumers of our online and casual games various types of contests and promotional opportunities. We are subject to laws in a number of jurisdictions concerning the operation and offering of such activities and games, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. Further, some of our online games and other services include random digital item mechanics, which may become subject to regulations in various jurisdictions. If these were to occur, we might be required to seek licenses, authorizations, or approvals from relevant regulators, the granting of which may be dependent on us meeting certain capital and other requirements, and we may be subject to additional regulation and oversight, such as reporting to regulators, all of which could significantly increase our operating costs. Changes in current laws or regulations or the imposition of new laws and regulations in the United States, Europe, or elsewhere regarding these activities may lessen the growth of casual game services and impair our business.

    Change in government regulations relating to the Internet could negatively impact our business.

            We rely on our consumers' access to significant levels of Internet bandwidth for the sale and digital delivery of our content and the functionality of our games with online features. Changes in laws or regulations that adversely affect the growth, popularity or use of the Internet, including laws impacting "net neutrality," could decrease the demand for our products and services or increase our cost of doing business. Although certain jurisdictions have implemented laws and regulations intended to prevent Internet service providers from discriminating against particular types of legal traffic on their networks, other jurisdictions may lack such laws and regulations or repeal existing laws or regulations. For example, on December 14, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission voted to repeal net neutrality regulations in the U.S. Given uncertainty around these rules, including changing interpretations, amendments, or repeal, coupled with the potentially significant political and economic power of local Internet service providers and the relatively significant level of Internet bandwidth access our products and services require, we could experience discriminatory or anti-competitive practices that could impede our growth, cause us to incur additional expenses, or otherwise negatively impact our business.

    The laws and regulations concerning data privacy are continually evolving. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could harm our business.

            Consumers play certain of our games online using third-party platforms and networks, through online social platforms, and on mobile devices. We collect and store information about our consumers of these games—both personally identifying and non-personally identifying information. We are subject to laws from a variety of jurisdictions regarding privacy and the protection of this information. For example, the E.U. has traditionally taken a broader view than the United States and certain other jurisdictions as to what is considered personal information and has imposed greater obligations under data privacy regulations. The U.S. Children's Online Privacy Protection Act ("COPPA") also regulates the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information from children under 13 years of age. Failure


    Table of Contents

    to comply with COPPA may increase our costs, subject us to expensive and distracting government investigations, and result in substantial fines.

            Data privacy protection laws are rapidly changing and likely will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, which could impact our approach to operating and marketing our games. For example, the E.U.'s General Data Protection Regulation (the "GDPR"), which will come into effect in May 2018, imposes a range of new compliance obligations for us and other companies with European users, and increases financial penalties for noncompliance significantly. Regulators have not yet issued clear guidance for many of these new compliance obligations. The U.S. government, including the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce, is continuing to review the need for greater regulation over the collection of personal information and information about consumer behavior on the Internet and on mobile devices, and the E.U. has proposed reforms to its existing data protection legal framework, including the GDPR. Various government and consumer agencies worldwide have also called for new regulation and changes in industry practices. In addition, in some cases, we are dependent upon our platform providers to solicit, collect and provide us with information regarding our consumers that is necessary for compliance with these various types of regulations.

            Player interaction with our games is subject to our privacy policies, end user license agreements ("EULAs"), and terms of service. If we fail to comply with our posted privacy policies, EULAs, or terms of service, or if we fail to comply with existing privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations, it could result in proceedings or litigation against us by governmental authorities or others, which could result in fines or judgments against us, damage our reputation, impact our financial condition and harm our business. If regulators, the media, or consumers raise any concerns about our privacy and data protection or consumer protection practices, even if unfounded, this could also result in fines or judgments against us, damage our reputation, negatively impact our financial condition, and damage our business.

    We depend on servers to operate our games with online features and our proprietary online gaming service. If we were to lose server functionality for any reason, our business may not be ablenegatively impacted.

            Our business relies on the continuous operation of servers, some of which are owned and operated by third parties. Although we strive to adequately adjustmaintain more than sufficient server capacity, and provide for active redundancy in the event of limited hardware failure, any broad-based catastrophic server malfunction, a significant service-disrupting attack or intrusion by hackers that circumvents security measures, a failure of disaster recovery service or the failure of a company on which we are relying for server capacity to provide that capacity for whatever reason would likely degrade or interrupt the functionality of our cost structuregames with online features, and could prevent the operation of such games altogether, any of which could result in the loss of sales for, or in, such games. This risk is particularly pronounced with respect to the mobile games published by King, which rely on a timely fashionsmall number of third-party owned data centers located in responseone city, or with respect to a sudden decrease in demand.the functioning of our proprietary online gaming service, Blizzard Battle.net, the disruption of which could prevent Blizzard from delivering content digitally or render all of Blizzard's games, as well asDestiny 2 PC content, unavailable.

            We also rely on networks operated by third parties, such as the PlayStation Network, Xbox Live and Steam, for the sale and digital delivery of downloadable console and PC game content and the functionality of our games with online features. Similarly, we rely on the continued operation of the Apple App Store, the Google Play Store, and Facebook for the sale of virtual currency for our free-to-play games. An extended interruption to any of these services could adversely affect our ability to sell and distribute our digital products and operate our games with online features, negatively impacting our business.


    Table of Contents

            Further, insufficient server capacity could also negatively impact our business. Conversely, if we overestimate the amount of server capacity required by our business, we may incur additional operating costs.

    We rely on complex information technology systems and networks to operate our business. Any significant data breach or system or network disruption could negatively impact our business.

            In the eventcourse of our day-to-day business, we and third parties operating on our behalf create, store, and/or use commercially sensitive information, such as the source code and game assets for our interactive entertainment software products and confidential information with respect to our customers, consumers, and employees. A malicious intrusion by hackers or other breach of the systems on which such source code and assets, account information (including personally identifiable information) and other sensitive data (including credit card information maintained in a significant decline in demandproprietary database) is stored could lead to piracy of our software, fraudulent activity, disclosure or misappropriation of, or access to, our customers', consumers' or employees' personally identifiable information or our own sensitive business data. We have implemented programs intended to secure our data and systems and prevent unauthorized access to, or loss of, sensitive data. However, because these attacks may remain undetected for oneprolonged periods of time and the techniques used by criminal hackers and other third parties to breach systems change frequently, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or moreimplement adequate preventative measures. A data intrusion into a server for a game with online features or for our proprietary online gaming service could also disrupt the operation of such game or platform. If we are subject to data security breaches, or a security-related incident that materially disrupts the availability of our products and services, we may have a loss in sales or subscriptions or be forced to pay damages or incur other costs, including from the implementation of additional security measures, or suffer reputational damage. Additionally, while we maintain insurance policies, they may be insufficient to reimburse us for all losses or all types of claims that may be caused by data breaches or system or network disruptions. Moreover, if there were a public perception that our data protection measures are inadequate, whether or not be able to reduce personnel or make other changesthe case, it could result in reputational damage and potential harm to our business relationships or the public perception of our business model. In addition, such data security breaches may subject us to legal claims or proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, especially if there is loss, disclosure, or misappropriation of, or access to, our customers' credit card or other sensitive or personally identifiable information.

    Our reported financial results could be significantly impacted by changes in financial accounting standards or by the application of existing or future accounting standards to our business as it evolves.

            Our reported financial results are impacted by the accounting policies promulgated by the SEC and national accounting standards bodies and the methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies. Policies affecting revenue recognition have affected, and could further significantly affect, the way we report revenues related to our products and services. We recognize a majority of the revenues from bundled sales (i.e., video games that include an online service component) on a deferred basis over an estimated service period for such games. In addition, we defer the cost structure without disruptingof revenues of those products. Further, as we increase our operations or incurring costs. Further,downloadable content and add new features to our online services, our estimate of the service period may change and we may notcould be ablerequired to implement such actions in a timely manner, if at all, to offset an immediate shortfall inrecognize revenues, and profit. Moreover, cost-reduction actions may decreasedefer related costs, over a shorter or longer period of time. As we enhance, expand and diversify our employee moralebusiness and resultproduct offerings, the application of existing or future financial accounting standards, particularly those relating to the way we account for revenues and taxes, could have a significant impact on our reported net revenues, net income and earnings per share under accounting principles generally accepted in the failure to execute upon our business plan due to the lossUnited States in any given period.


    Table of employees or impact our ability to retain or recruit key employees. In addition, any such action may involve the risk that our senior management's attention will be excessively diverted from our other operations.Contents

    Provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware state law could delay or prevent a change of control.

            Our Amended and Restated Bylaws contain a provision regulating the ability of shareholders to bring matters for action before annual and special meetings. The regulations on shareholder action could make it more difficult for any person seeking to acquire control of the Company to obtain shareholder approval of actions that would support this effort. In addition, our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of so-called "blank check" preferred stock. This ability of our Board of Directors to issue and fix the rights and preferences of preferred stock could effectively dilute the interests of any person seeking control or otherwise make it more difficult to obtain control.

    We have a number of large shareholders who may sell a large volume of our stock, which could causeHistorically, our stock price to decrease.has been highly volatile.

            We have a numberThe trading price of large shareholders,our common stock has been, and could continue to be, subject to wide fluctuations in response to many factors, including ASAC. The salefor example, but without limitation:

      quarter-to-quarter variations in the results of a substantial numberour operations;

      the announcement of sharesnew products;

      the announcement of lower prices on competing products;

      product development or release schedules;

      general conditions in the computer, software, entertainment, media or electronics industries, or in the worldwide economy;

      announcements of developments in the overall worldwide market for interactive entertainment, including announcements of industry sales data;

      the timing of the introduction of new platforms and delays in the actual release of new platforms;

      hardware manufacturers' announcements of price changes for hardware platforms;

      consumer acceptance of hardware platforms;

      consumer spending trends;

      the outcome of lawsuits or regulatory investigations in which we are, or may become, involved;

      changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by analysts;

      sales or acquisitions of common stock by ASACour directors or any other large shareholder within a short period of time could causeexecutive management; and

      investor perceptions and expectations regarding our stock price to decrease,products, plans and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of sharesstrategic position, and those of our common stock.

      competitors and customers.

    Catastrophic events may disrupt our business.

            Our corporate headquarters and our primary corporate disaster center are located in the Los Angeles, California area and our primary corporate disaster recovery data center is in Las Vegas, Nevada, each of which is near a major earthquake fault. A major earthquake or other catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business or information technology systems, or otherwise prevents us from conducting our normal business operations, could require significant expenditures to resume operations and have a material adverse effect onnegatively impact our business. While we maintain insurance coverage for some of these events, the potential liabilities associated with such events could exceed the insurance coverage we maintain. Further, our system redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities.


    Table of Contents

    Any such event could also limit the ability of retailers, distributors or our other customers to sell or distribute our products.

    If general economic conditions decline, demand for our products could decline.

            Purchases of our products and services involve discretionary spending on the part of consumers. Consumers are generally more willing to make discretionary purchases, including purchases of products and services like ours, during periods in which favorable economic conditions prevail. As a result, our products are sensitive to general economic conditions and economic cycles. A reduction or shift in domestic or international consumer spending could result in an increase in our selling and promotional expenses, in an effort to offset that reduction, and could have a material adverse effect onnegatively impact our business.


    Table of Contents

    The uncertainty of worldwide economic conditions makes budgeting and forecasting very difficult.

            We are unable to predict worldwide economic conditions, and all of the effects those conditions may have on our business. In particular, the uncertainty of future worldwide economic conditions subjects our forecasts to heightened risks and uncertainties.

    Item 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

            None.

    Item 2.    PROPERTIES

            Our principal corporate and administrative offices are located at 3100 Ocean Park Boulevard, Santa Monica, California. Other significant leased facilities include: our Blizzard offices located in Irvine, California and our North America distribution warehouse located in Fresno, California.

    The following is a summary of the principal leased offices we maintained as of December 31, 2015:

    2017:

    Type of Leased Facility
     Americas EMEA(1) Asia Total 
     
     Square footage of leased properties
     

    Corporate Offices

      152,431  1,147    153,578 

    Activision Product Development & Publishing Facilities (Activision segment)

      724,122  48,343  25,838  798,303 

    Blizzard Product Development & Publishing Facilities (Blizzard segment)

      904,773  99,922  102,898  1,107,593 

    King Product Development & Publishing Facilities (King segment)

      83,885  401,469  4,189  489,543 

    Distribution and Other Facilities

      23,557  101,583    125,140 

    Sales offices

      12,267  34,747  8,055  55,069 

    Total

      1,901,035  687,211  140,980  2,729,226 

    Type of Leased Facility
     North America Europe Asia Total 
     
     Square footage of leased properties
     

    Corporate Offices

      139,085  14,390    153,475 

    Activision Product Development & Publishing Facilities (Activision segment)

      852,623  58,414  24,614  935,651 

    Blizzard Product Development & Publishing Facilities (Blizzard segment)

      420,301  123,139  87,253  630,693 

    Distribution and Other Facilities

      86,731  165,759    252,490 

    Sales offices

      13,345  48,313  7,837  69,495 

    Total

      1,512,085  410,015  119,704  2,041,804 
    (1)
    Consists of the Europe, Middle East, and Africa geographic regions.

            In total, we lease 64 facilitieshave approximately 100 facility leases in the following 1720 countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malta, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

            The only facilities currently owned by the Company are two European warehouses utilized by the Distribution segment, one located in Burglengenfeld, Germany and the other in Venlo, the Netherlands.

            We anticipate no difficulty in extending the leases of our facilities or obtaining comparable facilities in suitable locations, as needed, and we consider our facilities to be adequate for our current needs. The only facilities currently owned by the Company are two European warehouses utilized by the Distribution segment, located in Burglengenfeld, Germany and Venlo, the Netherlands.

    Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

            We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims. SEC regulations govern disclosure of legal proceedings        As further described in periodic reports and Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 450 governs the disclosure of loss contingencies and accrual of loss contingencies in respect of litigation and other claims. We record an accrual for a potential loss when it is probable that a loss will occur and the amountNote 15 of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Whennotes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, on December 28, 2017, we received a Notice of Reassessment from the reasonable estimate of the potential loss is within a range of amounts, the minimum of the range of potential loss is accrued, unless a higher amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range. Moreover, even if an accrual is not required, we provide additional disclosureFTA related to litigationtransfer pricing concerning intercompany transactions involving one of our French subsidiaries for the 2011 through 2013 tax years. The total assessment, including penalties and other claims when itinterest, was approximately €571 million ($680 million). We disagree with the proposed assessment and intend to vigorously contest it. We plan to pursue all remedies available to us to successfully resolve this matter, including administrative remedies with the FTA, and judicial remedies, if necessary. While we believe our tax provisions at December 31, 2017 are appropriate, until such time as this matter is reasonably possible (i.e., more than remote) that the outcomes of such litigation and other claims include potential material adverse impacts on us.

            The outcomes of legal proceedings and other claims areultimately resolved we could be subject to significant uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. There is significant judgment required in the analysis of these matters, including the probability determination and whether a potential exposure can be reasonably estimated.additional tax liabilities. In making these determinations, we, in consultation with outside counsel, examine the


    Table of Contents

    relevant facts and circumstances on a quarterly basis assuming, as applicable, a combination of settlement and litigated outcomes and strategies. Moreover, legal matters are inherently unpredictable and the timing of development of factors on which reasonable judgments and estimates can be based can be slow. As such, there can be no assurance that the final outcome of any legal matter will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, profitability, cash flows or liquidity.

    Purchase Transaction Matters

            In prior periods, the Company reported on litigation relatedaddition to the Purchase Transaction. Duringrisk of additional tax for years 2011 through 2013, if litigation regarding this matter were adversely determined and/or if the period ended June 30, 2015, the casesFTA were resolved and dismissed with prejudice. As partto seek adjustments of the resolution of the claims,a similar nature for subsequent years, we received a settlement payment of $202 million in July 2015 from Vivendi, ASAC, and our insurers. We recorded the settlement within "Shareholders' equity" in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.

    Other Matterscould be subject to significant additional tax liabilities.

            In addition, we are party to routine claims, suits, investigations, audits, and other proceedings arising from the ordinary course of business, including with respect to intellectual property rights,


    Table of Contents

    contractual claims, labor and employment matters, regulatory matters, tax matters, unclaimed property matters, compliance matters, and collection matters. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, such routine claims and lawsuits are not significant and we do not expect them to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

    Item 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

      Not applicable


    Table of Contents


    PART II

    Item 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

    Market Information and Holders

            Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQNasdaq National Market under the symbol "ATVI."

    The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported sale prices for our common stock. At February 22, 2016,20, 2018, there were 1,7521,663 holders of record of our common stock.

     
     High Low 

    2014

           

    First Quarter Ended March 31, 2014

     $21.50 $16.55 

    Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2014

      22.40  18.82 

    Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2014

      24.18  20.65 

    Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2014

      21.98  17.73 
     
     High Low 

    2017

           

    First Quarter Ended March 31, 2017

     $50.40 $36.18 

    Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2017

      61.58  48.41 

    Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2017

      66.58  55.86 

    Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2017

      67.40  57.29 

     

     
     High Low 

    2015

           

    First Quarter Ended March 31, 2015

     $23.69 $18.43 

    Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2015

      26.09  22.28 

    Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2015

      32.50  24.04 

    Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2015

      39.93  30.25 
     
     High Low 

    2016

           

    First Quarter Ended March 31, 2016

     $38.09 $26.49 

    Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2016

      39.99  33.03 

    Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2016

      45.12  39.28 

    Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2016

      45.55  35.12 

    Table of Contents

    Stock Performance Graph

            This performance graph shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Activision Blizzard, Inc. under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933.

            The graph below matches the cumulative five-year total return of holders of our common stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index, the S&P 500, and the RDG Technology Composite index. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on December 31, 2010, and tracks each such investment through December 31, 2015.


    COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*RETURN

    Amongamong Activision Blizzard, Inc., the NASDAQNasdaq Composite Index, the S&P 500 Index,
    and the RDG Technology Composite Index


    *
    $100        The following graph and table compare the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock, the Nasdaq Composite Index, the S&P 500 Index, and the RDG Technology Composite Index. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested on 12/31/10 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
    Fiscal year ending December 31.

     
     12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 

    Activision Blizzard, Inc

     $100.00 $100.54 $87.91 $149.54 $170.59 $331.08 

    NASDAQ Composite

      100.00  100.53  116.92  166.19  188.78  199.95 

    S&P 500

      100.00  102.11  118.45  156.82  178.29  180.75 

    RDG Technology Composite

      100.00  100.56  115.30  152.75  177.73  181.32 

    31, 2012, and that dividends were reinvested daily. The stock price performance included in thison the following graph and table is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

    Cash Dividends

            On February 2, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.26 per common share, payable on May 11, 2016, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2016.

            On February 3, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.23 per common share, payable on May 13, 2015, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2015. On May 13, 2015, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $167 million to such shareholders, and

    Fiscal year ending December 31:
     12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 

    Activision Blizzard, Inc. 

     $100.00 $170.11 $194.06 $376.61 $354.16 $624.78 

    Nasdaq Composite

      100.00  141.63  162.09  173.33  187.19  242.29 

    S&P 500

      100.00  132.39  150.51  152.59  170.84  208.14 

    RDG Technology Composite

      100.00  132.51  155.05  161.00  181.12  247.79 

    Table of Contents

    on May 29, 2015, we made relatedCash Dividends

            We have paid a dividend equivalent paymentsannually since 2010. Below is a summary of $3 million to certain holders of restricted stock rights.

            On February 6, 2014, ourcash dividends paid over the past three fiscal years, along with the dividend most recently declared by the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per common share, payable onthat will be paid in May 14, 2014, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 2014. On May 14, 2014, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $143 million to such shareholders, and on May 30, 2014, we made related dividend equivalent payments of $4 million to holders of restricted stock units.2018:

    Year
     Per Share
    Amount
     Record
    Date
     Dividend
    Payment
    Date
     

    2018

     $0.34  3/30/2018  5/9/2018 

    2017

     $0.30  3/30/2017  5/10/2017 

    2016

     $0.26  3/30/2016  5/11/2016 

    2015

     $0.23  3/30/2015  5/13/2015 

            Future dividends will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, cash requirements, anticipated future prospects, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Further, agreements governing certain of our indebtedness, including the indenture governing the Notes and the Credit Agreement, as described in Note 11 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, may, under certain circumstances, limit our ability to pay distributions or dividends with certain exceptions.dividends. There can be no assurances that dividends will be declared in the future.

    10b5-1 Stock Trading Plans

            The Company's directors and employees may, at a time they are not aware of material non-public information, enter into plans ("Rule 10b5-1 Plans") to purchase or sell shares of our common stock that satisfy the requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1. 10b5-1 ("Rule 10b5-1 permits tradingPlans"). Rule 10b5-1 Plans permit persons whose ability to purchase or sell our common stock may otherwise be substantially restricted (by quarterly and special stock-trading blackouts and by their possession from time to time of material nonpublic information) to trade on a pre-arranged, "automatic-pilot" basis,basis.

            Trading under Rule 10b5-1 Plans is subject to certain conditions, including that the person for whom the plan is created (or anyone else aware of material non-public information acting on such person's behalf) not exercise any subsequent influence regarding the amount, price and dates of transactions under the plan. In addition, any such plan of the Company's directors and employees is requiredCompany requires Rule 10b5-1 Plans to be established and maintained in accordance with the Company's "Policy on Establishing and Maintaining 10b5-1 Trading Plans."

            Rule 10b5-1 Plans permit persons whose ability to purchase or sell our common stock may otherwise be substantially restricted (by quarterly and special stock-trading blackouts and by their possession from time to time of material nonpublic information) to engage in pre-arranged trading.        Trades under a Rule 10b5-1 Plan by our directors and employees are not necessarily indicative of their respective opinions of our current or potential future performance at the time of the trade. Trades by our directors and executive officers pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 Plan will be disclosed publicly through Form 144 and Form 4 filings with the SEC, in accordance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.

    Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

            On February 3, 2015,2, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant tounder which we are authorized to repurchase up to $750 million$1 billion of the Company'sour common stock during the two-year period from February 9, 201513, 2017 through February 8, 2017. No repurchases12, 2019. As of the date hereof, we have been madenot repurchased any shares under this authorizedprogram and the determination as to if and when we make any such stock repurchase program.

            On October 11, 2013, we repurchased 428,676,471 shares of our common stock, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement we entered intorepurchases will be dependent on July 25, 2013, with Vivendimarket conditions and ASAC II LP, an exempted limited partnership established under the laws of the Cayman Islands, acting by its general partner, ASAC II LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, we acquired all of the capital stock of Amber Holding Subsidiary Co., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi, which was the direct owner of 428,676,471 shares of our common stock, for a cash payment of $5.83 billion, or $13.60 per share, before taking into account the benefit to the Company of certain tax attributes of New VH assumed in the transaction. The repurchased shares were recorded in "Treasury Stock" in our consolidated balance sheet.other factors.


    Table of Contents

    Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

            The following table summarizes certain selected consolidated financial data, which should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data presented below at and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 20152017 is derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements and include the operations of King commencing on the King Acquisition Date. All amounts set forth in the following tables are in millions, except per share data.


     For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 

     2015 2014 2013 2012 2011  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 

    Statement of Operations Data:

                          

    Net Revenues

     $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 $4,856 $4,755 

    Net revenues

     $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 

    Net income(1)

     892 835 1,010 1,149 1,085  273 966 892 835 1,010 

    Basic net income per share

     1.21 1.14 0.96 1.01 0.93  0.36 1.30 1.21 1.14 0.96 

    Diluted net income per share

     1.19 1.13 0.95 1.01 0.92  0.36 1.28 1.19 1.13 0.95 

    Cash dividends declared per share(1)

     0.23 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.165  0.30 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.19 

    Operating cash flows

     
    $

    2,213
     
    $

    2,155
     
    $

    1,259
     
    $

    1,331
     
    $

    1,293
     

    Balance Sheet Data:

                
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Total assets(2)

     $15,251 $14,642 $13,953 $14,181 $13,228 

    Total debt, net(3)

     4,079 4,324 4,693   

    Cash and investments(2)

     $4,775 $3,271 $1,840 $4,867 $4,452 

    Total assets

     18,668 17,452 15,246 14,637 13,947 

    Long-term debt, net(3)

     4,390 4,887 4,074 4,319 4,687 

    Long-term debt, gross

     4,440 4,940 4,119 4,369 4,744 

    Net debt(4)

      1,669 2,279  292 

    (1)
    On February 3, 2015, our BoardNet income includes the impact of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.23 per share, payable on May 13, 2015,significant discrete tax-related impacts, including incremental income tax expense due to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2015. On February 6, 2014, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per share, payable on May 14, 2014, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 2014. On February 7, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per share, payable on May 15, 2013, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 20, 2013. On February 9, 2012, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.18 per share, payable on May 16, 2012, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2012. On February 9, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.165 per share, payable on May 11, 2011, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2011.

    (2)
    As of December 31, 2015, we early adopted ASU No. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, and retroactively applied to all prior periods presented in accordance with the requirements of the new standard. As a result of this retroactive application of the new standard, total assets as of December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011, were reduced by $104 million, $59 million, $19 million, and $49 million, respectively. Refer toU.S. Tax Reform Act. See further discussion in Note 2115 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K.

    (2)
    Cash and investments consists of cash and cash equivalents along with short-term and long-term investments. We had short-term investments of $62 million and did not have any long-term investments as of December 31, 2017. We had short-term and long-term investments of $13 million and $13 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2016, $8 million and $9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2015, $10 million and $9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014, and $33 million and $9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. Cash and investments as of December 31, 2015 excludes $3,561 million of cash placed in escrow for additional information regarding recent accounting pronouncements andthe King Acquisition.

    (3)
    For discussion on our early adoptiondebt obligations, see Note 11 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this new standard.Annual Report on Form 10-K.

    (3)(4)
    In connection with the Purchase Transaction, on September 19, 2013, we issued $1.5 billion of 5.625% unsecured senior notes due September 2021 (the "2021 Notes"),Net debt is defined as long-term debt, gross less cash and $750 million of 6.125% unsecured senior notes due September 2023 (the "2023 Notes", and together with the 2021 Notes, the "Notes"). On October 11, 2013, we entered into a $2.5 billion secured term loan facility (the "Term Loan"), maturing in October 2020. The carrying values of the Notes and Term Loan are presented net of unamortized debt discount fees.investments.

    Table of Contents

    Item 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

    Business Overview

            Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment. The terms "Activision Blizzard," the "Company," "we," "us,"entertainment content and "our" are used to refer collectively to Activision Blizzard, Inc.services. We develop and its subsidiaries.distribute content and services on video game consoles, PC, and mobile devices. We also operate esports events and leagues and create film and television content based on our games.

    The Business Combination and Share Repurchase

            Activision, Inc. was originally incorporated in California in 1979 and was reincorporated in Delaware in December 1992.

            Activision Blizzard is the result of the 2008 business combination ("Business Combination") by and among the Company (then known as Activision, Inc.), Sego Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision, Inc., Vivendi S.A. ("Vivendi"), VGAC LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi, and Vivendi Games, Inc. ("Vivendi Games"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of VGAC LLC. As a result of the consummation of the Business Combination, Activision, Inc. was renamed Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Vivendi became a majority shareholder of Activision Blizzard. Activision Blizzard is a public company traded on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol "ATVI."

            On October 11, 2013, we repurchased approximately 429 million shares of our common stock, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") we entered into with Vivendi and ASAC II LP ("ASAC"), an exempted limited partnership established under the laws of the Cayman Islands, acting by its general partner, ASAC II LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, we acquired all of the capital stock of Amber Holding Subsidiary Co., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi ("New VH"), which was the direct owner of approximately 429 million shares of our common stock, for a cash payment of $5.83 billion, or $13.60 per share, before taking into account the benefit to the Company of certain tax attributes of New VH assumed in the transaction (collectively, the "Purchase Transaction"). Refer to Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the financing of the Purchase Transaction.

            Immediately following the completion of the Purchase Transaction, ASAC purchased from Vivendi 172 million shares of our common stock, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, for a cash payment of $2.34 billion, or $13.60 per share (the "Private Sale"). Robert A. Kotick, our Chief Executive Officer, and Brian G. Kelly, Chairman of our Board of Directors, are affiliates of ASAC II LLC.

            On May 28, 2014, Vivendi sold approximately 41 million shares, or approximately 50% of its then-current holdings, of our common stock in a registered public offering. Vivendi received proceeds of approximately $850 million from that sale; we did not receive any proceeds.

            As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately 734 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding. At that date, (i) Vivendi held 41 million shares, or approximately 6% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) ASAC held 172 million shares, or approximately 23% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and (iii) our other stockholders held approximately 71% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

            On January 13, 2016, Vivendi sold all of their remaining shares of our common stock. We did not receive any proceeds.


    Table of Contents

    The King Acquisition

            On November 2, 2015, we and King Digital Entertainment plc, a leading interactive entertainment company for the mobile world incorporated under the laws of Ireland ("King"), entered into a Transaction Agreement (the "Transaction Agreement") under the terms of which we would acquire King (the "King Acquisition") and King would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.        On February 23, 2016, we completed the King Acquisition under the termsfor an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.8 billion, as further described in Note 20 of the Transaction Agreement. We transferred $5.9 billion in considerationnotes to the existingconsolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements include the operations of King shareholderscommencing on February 23, 2016.

    Reportable Segments

            As part of the continued implementation of our esports strategy, we instituted changes to our internal organization and share-based award holders.

            The Company made this acquisition because it believesreporting structure such that the addition of King's highly-complementary mobileMLG business will position the Companynow operates as a global leader in interactive entertainment across mobile, console, and PC platforms, and positionsdivision of Blizzard. As such, commencing with the company for future growth. The combined company hassecond quarter of 2017, MLG, which was previously a world-class interactive entertainment portfolio of top-performing franchises.

            As the closingseparate operating segment, is now a component of the King Acquisition occurred subsequent to December 31, 2015, our financial results as of, andBlizzard operating segment. MLG is responsible for the year ended December 31, 2015, do not containoperations of the results of King.

    Reportable SegmentsOverwatch League, along with other esports events, and will also continue to serve as a multi-platform network for other Activision Blizzard esports content.

            Based upon our organizational structure, we conduct our business through twothree reportable operating segments,segments: Activision, Publishing, Inc.Blizzard, and Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. Previously, we reported "Distribution" as a reportable segment. In the current period, this was no longer deemed a separate reportable segment and is included in "Other", along with our recently announced media networks and film and television studio businesses.King.

    (i)    Activision Publishing, Inc.

            Activision Publishing, Inc. ("Activision") is a leading internationalglobal developer and publisher of interactive software products and content.entertainment content, particularly for the console platform. Activision primarily delivers content to a broad range of gamers, ranging from children to adults, and from core gamers to mass-market consumers to "value" buyers seeking budget-priced software, in a variety of geographies. Activision develops games based on internally-developed properties, including games in the Call of Duty® and Skylanders® franchises, and to a lesser extent, based on licensed intellectual properties. Additionally, we have established a long-term alliance with Bungie to publish its game universe,Destiny. Activision sells games through both retail and digital online channels.channels, including full-game and in-game sales, as well as by licensing software to third-party or related-party companies that distribute Activision currently offers games that operate on the Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") Xbox One ("Xbox One") and Xbox 360 ("Xbox 360"), Nintendo Co. Ltd. ("Nintendo") Wii U ("Wii U") and Wii ("Wii"), and Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. ("Sony") PlayStation 4 ("PS4") and PlayStation 3 ("PS3") console systems (Xbox One, Wii U, and PS4 are collectively referred to as "next-generation"; Xbox 360, Wii, and PS3 are collectively referred to as "prior-generation"); the personal computer ("PC"); the Nintendo 3DS, Nintendo Dual Screen, and Sony PlayStation Vita handheld game systems; and mobile and tablet devices.

    (ii) Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.

            Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. ("Blizzard") is a leader in online PC gaming, including the subscription-based massively multi-player online role-playing game ("MMORPG") category in terms of both subscriber base and revenues generated through its World of Warcraft® franchise. Blizzard alsoproducts. Activision develops, markets, and sells role-playing actionproducts based on our internally developed intellectual properties, as well as some licensed properties.

    (ii)   Blizzard

            Blizzard is a leading global developer and strategy gamespublisher of interactive software products and entertainment content, particularly for the PC console, mobileplatform. Blizzard primarily delivers content through retail and tablet platforms,digital channels, including games in the multiple-award winning Diablo®, StarCraft®, Hearthstone®: Heroes of Warcraft™subscriptions, full-game, and Heroes of the Storm™ franchises. In addition,in-game sales, as well as by licensing software to third-party or related-party companies that distribute Blizzard products. Blizzard also maintains a proprietary online gaming service, Battle.net®,Blizzard Battle.net, which facilitates digital distribution of Blizzard content, along with Activision'sDestiny 2 content, online social connectivity, and the creation of user-generated content. As noted above, Blizzard also includes the activities of our MLG business, which is responsible for the operations of the Overwatch League, along with other esports events, and will also continue to serve as a multi-platform network for other Activision Blizzard esports content.

    (iii)  King

            King is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment content digital distribution and online social connectivity across all Blizzard games. Blizzardservices, particularly on mobile platforms, such as Google's Android and Apple's iOS. King also distributes its


    Table of Contents

    productscontent and generates revenues worldwide through various means, including: subscriptions; sales of prepaid subscription cards;services on the PC platform, primarily via Facebook. King's games are free to play, however, players can acquire in-game purchases and services; retail sales of physical "boxed" products; online download sales of PC products; purchases and downloads via third-party console, mobile and tablet platforms; and licensing of software to third-partyitems, either with virtual currency the players purchase or related party companies that distribute Blizzard products.directly using real currency.

    (iii) Other

            We also engage in other business opportunitiesbusinesses that include:do not represent reportable segments, including:

      The Activision Blizzard Media Networks ("Media Networks")the Studios business, announced in 2015 which builds on our efforts in competitive gaming and the growing eSports industry.

      The Activision Blizzard Studios ("Studios") business announced in 2015 which is devoted to creating original film and television content based on the company'sour extensive library of iconicglobally recognized intellectual properties; and globally-recognized intellectual properties.

      The Activision Blizzardthe Distribution ("Distribution") business, which consists of operations in Europe that provide warehousing, logistical,logistics, and sales distribution services to third-party publishers of interactive entertainment software, our own publishing operations, and manufacturers of interactive entertainment hardware.

    Business Results and Highlights

            In 2015, Activision Blizzard's Financial Results

            The Company's 2017 financial highlights include:

      consolidated net revenues were $4.7increased 6% to $7.0 billion and consolidated operating income wasdecreased 7% to $1.3 billion, as compared to consolidated net revenues of $4.4$6.6 billion and consolidated operating income of $1.2$1.4 billion in 2014. We generated 2016;

      revenues from digital online channels increased 13% to $5.5 billion, or 78% of consolidated net revenues, as compared to $4.9 billion, or 74% of consolidated net revenues, in 2016;

      operating margin was 18.7%, as compared to 21.4% in 2016;

      cash flows from operating activities of approximately $1.2$2.21 billion, in 2015,an increase of 3%, as compared to $1.3$2.16 billion in 2014.

              Consolidated net income was $892 million in 2015, as compared to $835 million in 2014. Our diluted earnings per common share was $1.19 in 2015, as compared to $1.13 in 2014.

      Product Release Highlights

              Games and digital downloadable content released, among others, during the year ended December 31, 2015 included:

        Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Havoc (digital downloadable content)2016;

        Callconsolidated net income decreased 72% to $273 million, as compared to $966 million in 2016, primarily driven by the impact of Duty: Advanced Warfare Ascendance (digital downloadable content)significant discrete tax-related impacts, including incremental income tax expense due to the impacts from the U.S. Tax Reform Act, as discussed in "Consolidated Results" below;

        Callconsolidated net income included $113 million of Duty: Advanced Warfare Supremacy (digital downloadable content)excess tax benefits from share-based payments, as compared to $81 million in 2016; and

        Calldiluted earnings per common share decreased 72% to $0.36, as compared to $1.28 in 2016, primarily driven by incremental income tax expense due to the impacts from the U.S. Tax Reform Act.

              Since certain of Duty: Advanced Warfare Reckoning (digital downloadable content)

      Callour games are hosted online or include online functionality that represents an essential component of Duty: Black Ops III

      Destiny Expansion II: Housegameplay and, as a result, a more-than-inconsequential separate deliverable, we initially defer the software-related revenues from the sale of Wolves

      Destiny Expansion III: The Taken King

      Guitar Hero® Live

      Hearthstone: Heroesthese games and recognize the attributable revenues over the relevant estimated service periods, which are generally less than a year. Net revenues and operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017, include a net effect of Warcraft—Blackrock Mountain™

      Hearthstone: Heroes$139 million and $71 million, respectively, from the deferrals of Warcraft—The Grand Tournament™

      Hearthstone: Heroesnet revenues and related cost of Warcraft—League of Explorers™

      Heroes of the Storm
    revenues.


    Table of Contents

    Release Highlights

            Games and downloadable content that were released during 2017, include:

      Skylanders SuperChargers

      StarCraft II: Legacy of the Void

            In addition to the above, we released additionalActivision's four downloadable content within our various franchises throughout 2015 that provided additional monetization opportunities, such as "supply drops" inpacks forCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareInfinite Warfare™; and various customization microtransactions withinDestiny.

            On October 27, 2015, Blizzard began the closed beta test forOverwatch™, its upcoming team-based first-person shooter.

            On February 2, 2016, Activision releasedCall of Duty: Black Ops III Awakening, the firstone downloadable content pack forCall of Duty: Modern Warfare® Remastered;

    Activision'sCall of Duty: Black Ops III Zombies Chronicles, a downloadable content pack of remastered zombies maps fromCall of Duty: World at War, Call of Duty: Black Ops, andCall of Duty: Black Ops II;

    Activision'sCrash Bandicoot™ N. Sane Trilogy, a remastered version of the first three Crash Bandicoot games for Playstation 4;

    Activision'sDestiny 2, the sequel toDestiny, onandCurse of Osiris, the PS4,first expansion toDestiny 2;

    Activision'sCall of Duty: WWII;

    Blizzard's latest expansions toHearthstone—Journey to Un'Goro™,Knights of the Frozen Throne™, andKobolds and Catacombs™;

    Blizzard'sRise of the Necromancer™, a downloadable content pack forDiablo III; and

    King'sBubble Witch 3 Saga™.

            We also completed the sale of 12 teams for the Overwatch League, the first major global professional esports league with an expected release date to other platforms of March 3, 2016.city-based teams. The first preseason matches occurred in December 2017 and the inaugural regular season started in January 2018.

    International OperationsSales

            International sales are a fundamental part of our business. Net revenues from international sales accounted for approximately 48%, 50%, and 47% of our total consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. In addition to our United States ("U.S.") operations, we maintain significant operations in Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom ("U.K."). An important element of our international strategy is to develop content that is specifically directed toward local cultures and customs. Net revenues from international sales accounted for approximately 55%, 55%, and 52% of our total consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The majority of our net revenues from foreign countries are generated by consumers in Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Our international business is subject to risks typical of an international business, including, but not limited to, foreign currency exchange rate volatility and changes in local economies. Accordingly, our future results could be materially and adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in local economies.economies

    Operating Metrics

            The following operating metrics are key performance indicators that we use to evaluate our business.

    Monthly Active Users

            We monitor monthly active users ("MAUs") as a key measure of the overall size of our user base. MAUs are the number of individuals who accessed a particular game in a given month. We calculate average MAUs in a period by adding the total number of MAUs in each of the months in a given period and dividing that total by the number of months in the period. An individual who accesses two of our games would be counted as two users. In addition, due to technical limitations, for Activision and King, an individual who accesses the same game on two platforms or devices in the relevant period would be counted as two users. For Blizzard, an individual who accesses the same game on two platforms or devices in the relevant period would generally be counted as a single user.


    Table of Contents

            The number of MAUs for a given period can be significantly impacted by the timing of new content releases, since new releases may cause a temporary surge in MAUs. Accordingly, although we believe that overall trending in the number of MAUs can be a meaningful performance metric, period-to-period fluctuations may not be indicative of longer-term trends. The following table details our average MAUs on a sequential quarterly basis for each of our reportable segments (amounts in millions):

     
     December 31,
    2017
     September 30,
    2017
     June 30,
    2017
     March 31,
    2017
     December 31,
    2016
     September 30,
    2016
     

    Activision

      55  49  47  48  51  46 

    Blizzard

      40  42  46  41  41  42 

    King

      290  293  314  342  355  394 

    Total

      385  384  407  431  447  482 

            Average MAUs for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 were comparable to the quarter ended September 30, 2017. The decrease in King's and Blizzard's average MAUs is partially offset by an increase in Activision's average MAUs driven by the Call of Duty franchise due to the launch ofCall of Duty: WWII in November 2017.

            Average MAUs decreased by 62 million, or 14%, for the quarter ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in King's average MAUs is due to decreases across King's franchises that are largely attributable to less engaged users leaving the network and maturity of titles.

    Net Bookings

            We monitor net bookings as a key operating metric in evaluating the performance of our business. Net bookings is defined as the net amount of products and services sold digitally or sold-in physically in the period, and includes license fees, merchandise, and publisher incentives, among others. Net bookings were as follows (amounts in millions):

     
     For the years ended
    December 31,
      
      
     
     
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     
     
     2017 2016 2015 

    Net bookings

     $7,156 $6,599 $4,621 $557 $1,978 

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in net bookings for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      higher net bookings from King titles, as 2017 includes King net bookings for the full year, while 2016 only included King net bookings for the partial period following the King Closing Date, as well as higher net bookings from the Candy Crush franchise, due to in-game events and features;

      higher net bookings from the Destiny franchise, driven by the release ofDestiny 2 in September 2017;

      higher net bookings fromCall of Duty: WWII, which was released in November 2017, as compared toCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare (which, when referred to herein, is inclusive ofCall of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered), the comparable 2016 title;

      higher net bookings from the continued strength ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared to prior catalog releases, driven by the downloadable content pack,Zombies Chronicles, which was released in May 2017, and the continued strength of microtransactions; and

    Table of Contents

      net bookings fromCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, which was released in June 2017.

            The increase was partially offset by:

      lower net bookings fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title;

      lower net bookings fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016;

      lower net bookings fromWorld of Warcraft, driven by the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Legion™ in August 2016, with no comparable release in 2017; and

      lower net bookings from the Skylanders® franchise, due to the release ofSkylanders Imaginators in October 2016, with no comparable release in 2017.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in net bookings for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      new net bookings from King titles following the King Closing Date, primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise;

      net bookings fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016;

      higher net bookings from digital content associated withCall of Duty: Black Ops III, which was released in November 2015, as compared toCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, the comparable 2014 title; and

      higher net bookings fromWorld of Warcraft, driven by the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Legion in August 2016, with no comparable release in 2015.

            The increase was partially offset by:

      lower net bookings fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, which was released in November 2016, as compared toCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title;

      lower net bookings from the Destiny franchise, as there were two expansion packs in 2015—House of Wolves andThe Taken King—but only one in 2016—Rise of Iron;

      lower net bookings fromSkylanders Imaginators, which was released in October 2016, as compared toSkylanders Superchargers, the comparable 2015 title, as well as lower net bookings from standalone toys and accessories from the Skylanders franchise in 2016; and

      lower net bookings fromGuitar Hero® Live, which was released in 2015, with no comparable release in 2016.

    Management's Overview of Business Trends

    Digital Revenues

            We provide our products through both retailInteractive Entertainment and digital distribution channels. Many of our video games that are available through retailers as physical "boxed" software products are also available digitally (from our websites and from websites and digital distribution channels owned by third parties). In addition, we offer players digital downloadable content as add-ons to our products (e.g.Mobile Gaming Growth, new multi-player content packs or in-game microtransactions), generally for a one-time fee. We also offer subscription-based services and other value-added services forWorld of Warcraft, all of which are digitally delivered and hosted by Battle.net.

            We currently define sales via digital online channels as revenues from digitally distributed subscriptions, licensing royalties, value-added services, downloadable content, microtransactions, and products. This definition may differ from that used by our competitors or other companies.

            According to Activision Blizzard internal estimates, digital gaming revenues forOur business participates in the global interactive entertainment industry in 2015, increased by approximately 20% as compared to 2014. The primary driversindustry. Games have become an increasingly popular form of the increase in digital gaming revenues were increases in microtransactions and consumer purchases of full games via digital channels. In addition to increasing microtransactions within free-to-play games, the increase includes microtransactions within purchased game software, as publishers offer increasingly new opportunities for monetization within their games to extend and enlarge the monetization cycle. Digital revenues are an important part of our business,entertainment, and we continueestimate the total industry has grown, on average, 18% over the last three years. The industry continues to focusbenefit from additional players entering the market as interactive entertainment becomes more common place across age groups and as more developing regions gain access to this form of entertainment.

            Further, the wide adoption of smart phones globally and the free-to-play business model on those platforms has increased the total addressable market for gaming significantly by introducing gaming to new age groups and develop products, such as downloadable content, that cannew regions and allowing gaming to occur more widely outside the home. Mobile gaming is now estimated to be delivered via digital channels. The amount of our digital revenues in any period may fluctuate depending, in part, on the timinglarger than console and nature of our specific product releases. Our sales of digital downloadable content are driven in part by sales of,PC gaming and engagement by players in, our retail products. As such, lower revenues in ourcontinues to grow at a


    Table of Contents

    retail distribution channelssignificant rate. King is a leading developer of mobile and free-to-play games and our other business units have mobile efforts underway that present the opportunity for us to expand the reach of, and drive additional player investment from, our franchises.

    Opportunities to Expand Franchises Outside of Games

            Our fans spend significant time investing in one year may impact our revenuesfranchises through digital online channels in the subsequent year.

            For the year ended December 31, 2015, net revenues through digital online channels increased by $605 million, as compared to 2014, and represented 54%purchases of our total consolidated net revenues,game content, whether through purchases of full games or downloadable content or via microtransactions. Given the passion our players have for our franchises, we believe there are emerging opportunities to drive additional engagement and investment in our franchises outside of games. These opportunities include esports, film and television, and consumer products. Our efforts to build these adjacent opportunities are still relatively nascent, but we view them as comparedpotentially significant sources of future revenues.

            As part of our efforts to 43% in 2014. On a non-GAAP basis (which excludestake advantage of the impactesports opportunity, during 2017 we completed the sale of deferred revenues), net revenues through digital online channels12 teams for the year endedOverwatch League. The Overwatch League is the first major global professional esports league with city-based teams. The first preseason matches occurred in December 31, 2015 increased by $430 million, as compared to 2014,2017 and represented 57% of our total non-GAAP net revenues, as compared to 46%the inaugural regular season started in 2014.

            Please refer to the reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures later in this document for further discussions of retail and digital online channels.January 2018.

    Console Platform Transition

            In November 2013, Sony released the PS4 and Microsoft released the Xbox One, their respective next-generation game consoles and entertainment systems. According to The NPD Group and GfK Chart-Track in North America and Europe, as of December 31, 2015, the combined installed base of PS4 and Xbox One hardware was approximately 43 million units, representing growth of approximately 82% over the combined installed base of approximately 24 million units as of December 31, 2014. While the combined installed base of PS3 and Xbox 360 hardware was approximately 124 million units as of December 31, 2015, at the comparable point in their release cycle, the prior-generation platforms had only 28 million units installed.

            When new console platforms are announced or introduced into the market, consumers reduce their purchases of game console software products for prior-generation console platforms in anticipation of new platforms becoming available. During these periods, sales of the game console software products we publish slow or even decline until the new platforms introduced achieve wide consumer acceptance, which we believe had largely occurred with respect to the next-generation platforms by the end of 2015. We believe that for 2016, the sales impact from the console transition will not be a meaningful driver of the business.

            During platform transitions, we simultaneously incur costs to develop and market new titles for prior-generation video game platforms and to develop and market products for next-generation platforms. We continually monitor console hardware sales and manage our product delivery on each of the prior- and next-generation platforms in a manner we believe to be most effective to maximize our revenue opportunities and achieve the desired return on our investments in product development.

    Concentration of Top TitlesSales Among the Most Popular Franchises

            The concentration of retail revenues among key titles has continued as a trend in the overall interactive softwareentertainment industry. According to The NPD Group, the top 10 titles accounted for 33%36% of the retail sales in the U.S. interactive entertainment industry in 2015.2017. Similarly, a significant portion of our revenues has historically been derived from video games based on a few popular franchises and these video games arewere responsible for a disproportionately high percentage of our profits. For example, the Call of Duty, Candy Crush, World of Warcraft, Skylanders, and DestinyOverwatch franchises, combinedcollectively, accounted for 71%, 72%, and 80%66% of our consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, revenues—and a significantly higher percentage of our operating income. As a result, successful competition against theseincome—for 2017.

            The top titles can significantly impact our performance. Notably in 2015, the toysindustry are also becoming more consistent as players and revenues concentrate more heavily in established franchises. Of the top 10 console franchises in 2017, all 10 are from established franchises. Similarly, according to life category became more competitive with a new entrant competing directly with usU.S rankings for the Apple App Store and other incumbents.Google Play store per App Annie Intelligence as of December 2017, the top 10 mobile games have an average tenure of 22 months.

            WeIn addition to investing in and developing sequels and content for our top titles, we are continually exploring additional investmentsways to expand those franchises. Further, while there is no guarantee of success, we invest in existingnew properties in an effort to develop future top franchises. In 2014, we releasedHearthstone and future franchises. DuringDestiny, in 2015, we releasedHeroes of the Storm, as well asCall of Duty Onlineand in China. In the fourth quarter of 2015,


    Table of Contents

    2016, we releasedOverwatch into closed beta with an anticipated game release. Additionally, to diversify our portfolio of key franchises and increase our presence in spring of 2016. There is no guarantee these investments will result in an established franchise.

            Additionally,the mobile market, on February 23, 2016, we completed the King Acquisition, diversifying our portfolio of key franchises.Acquisition.

            Overall, we do expect that a limited number of popular franchises will continue to produce a disproportionately high percentage of our, and the industry's, revenues and profits in the near future. Accordingly, our ability to maintain our top franchises and our ability to successfully compete against our competitors' top franchises can significantly impact our performance.


    SeasonalityTable of Contents

    Recurring Revenue Business Models and Seasonality

            Increased consumer online connectivity has allowed us to offer players new investment opportunities and to shift our business further towards a more consistently recurring and year-round model. Offering downloadable content and microtransactions, in addition to full games, allows our players to access and invest in new content throughout the year. This incremental content not only provides additional high-margin revenues, it can also increase player engagement. Also, mobile games, and free-to-play games more broadly, are generally less seasonal.

            While our business is transitioning to a year-round engagement model, the interactive entertainment industry remains highlysomewhat seasonal. We have historically experienced our highest sales volume, particularly for Activision, in the year-end holiday buying season, which occurs in the fourth quarter. We deferFollowing the recognitionacquisition of King, which focuses on free-to-play games which are generally less seasonal, and as we otherwise make the shift to a significant amountyear-round model, less of our net revenues relatedare generated during the fourth quarter. For our reportable segments—Activision, Blizzard, and King—the percentage of our revenue represented by the fourth quarter in each of 2017 and 2016 was 36%, as compared to our software titles containing online functionality that constitutes a more-than-inconsequential separate service deliverable, over an extended period of time (46% in 2015.

    Expected Upcoming Releases

            We expect to releasei.e.,World of Warcraft: Battle for Azeroth typically less than a year). As a result, the quarter in which we generate the highest sales volume may be different than the quarter in which we recognize the highest amountand our latest Call of net revenues. Our results can also vary based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, title release date, consumer demand, market conditions and shipment schedules.

    Outlook

            For 2016, our results will include the operations of King, beginning on February 23, 2016, the date the King Acquisition closed. Our earnings under accounting principles generally acceptedDuty game in the United Statessecond half of America ("GAAP") are expected to be down versus prior-year, as the expected results will be impacted by additional accounting charges associated with the King Acquisition, which include, among other things, integration and acquisition-related costs, the amortization of intangible assets resulting from purchase price accounting adjustments, and the related tax impact from the King Acquisition. The majority of these GAAP accounting charges will not impact the economics or operating cash flows of our business, although they will have a material impact on our 2016 GAAP results.

            For Activision,2018. In addition, we expect to deliver multipleongoing content for our various franchises, including expansion packs forHearthstone andDestiny 2, in-game events forOverwatch, and map packs toforCall of Duty: Black Ops III,WWII along with additional in-game content, during 2016. For the Destiny franchise, Activision expects to deliver a new expansion in 2016 with the full-game Destiny sequel to come in 2017. Also in the fourth quarter, as well as releases of 2016, Activision plansremastered versions of titles from our library of IP. We also expect to release at least two new Call of Dutymobile titles during 2018, including a social casino game from King.

            We will also continue to invest in new opportunities, including new titles across our platforms, and Skylanders games. Blizzard planscontinue to releaseOverwatch in the spring of 2016, as well asWorld of Warcraft: Legion™ in the summer of 2016. In addition,Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraftbuild on our advertising andHeroes of the Storm will have ongoing content updates throughout the year. esports initiatives.


    Table of Contents

    Consolidated Statements of Operations Data

            The following table sets forth consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated in dollars and as a percentage of total net revenues, except for cost of revenues, which are presented as a percentage of associated revenues (amounts in millions):

     
     For the Years Ended December 31, 
     
     2017 2016 2015 

    Net revenues

                       

    Product sales

     $2,110  30%$2,196  33%$2,447  52%

    Subscription, licensing, and other revenues

      4,907  70  4,412  67  2,217  48 

    Total net revenues

      7,017  100  6,608  100  4,664  100 

    Costs and expenses

                       

    Cost of revenues—product sales:

                       

    Product costs

      733  35  741  34  872  36 

    Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses

      300  14  331  15  370  15 

    Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other:

                       

    Game operations and distribution costs

      
    984
      
    20
      
    851
      
    19
      
    274
      
    12
     

    Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses

      484  10  471  11  69  3 

    Product development

      1,069  15  958  14  646  14 

    Sales and marketing

      1,378  20  1,210  18  734  16 

    General and administrative

      760  11  634  10  380  8 

    Total costs and expenses

      5,708  81  5,196  79  3,345  72 

    Operating income

      1,309  19  1,412  21  1,319  28 

    Interest and other expense (income), net

      146  2  214  3  198  4 

    Loss on extinguishment of debt(1)

      12    92  1     

    Income before income tax expense

      1,151  16  1,106  17  1,121  24 

    Income tax expense

      878  13  140  2  229  5 

    Net income

     $273  4%$966  15%$892  19%

    (1)
    Represents the loss on extinguishment of debt we recognized associated with our refinancing activities. The 2017 loss on extinguishment is comprised of a $12 million write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs associated with refinancing activities on our tranche of term loans "A" and the 2016 loss on extinguishment was comprised of a premium payment of $63 million and a write-off of unamortized discount and financing costs of $29 million associated with the extinguishment of certain term loan and senior note facilities through our refinancing activities.

    Consolidated Net Revenues

            The following table summarizes our consolidated net revenues and the increase/(decrease) in deferred revenues recognized (amounts in millions):

     
     For the Years Ended December 31, 
     
     2015 2014 2013 

    Net revenues:

                       

    Product sales

     $2,447  52%$2,786  63%$3,201  70%

    Subscription, licensing, and other revenues

      2,217  48  1,622  37  1,382  30 

    Total net revenues

      4,664  100  4,408  100  4,583  100 

    Costs and expenses:

                       

    Cost of sales—product costs

      921  20  999  23  1,053  23 

    Cost of sales—online

      224  5  232  5  204  4 

    Cost of sales—software royalties and amortization

      412  9  260  6  187  4 

    Cost of sales—intellectual property licenses

      28    34  1  87  2 

    Product development

      646  14  571  13  584  13 

    Sales and marketing

      734  16  712  16  606  13 

    General and administrative

      380  8  417  9  490  11 

    Total costs and expenses

      3,345  72  3,225  73  3,211  70 

    Operating income

      1,319  28  1,183  27  1,372  30 

    Interest and other expense, net

      198  4  202  5  53  1 

    Income before income tax expense

      1,121  24  981  22  1,319  29 

    Income tax expense

      229  5  146  3  309  7 

    Net income

     $892  19%$835  19%$1,010  22%
     
     For the Years Ended December 31, 
     
     2017 2016 2015 Increase/
    (decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase/
    (decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     % Change
    2017 v 2016
     % Change
    2016 v 2015
     

    Consolidated net revenues

     $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 $409 $1,944  6% 42%

    Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues

      (139) 9  43  (148) (34)      

    Table of Contents

    Consolidated net revenues

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in consolidated net revenues for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      higher revenues from King titles, as 2017 includes King revenues for the full year, while 2016 only included King revenues for the partial period following the King Closing Date, as well as higher revenues from the Candy Crush franchise, due to in-game events and features;

      higher revenues recognized from the continued strength ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared to prior catalog releases, driven by the downloadable content pack,Zombies Chronicles, which was released in May 2017, and the continued strength of microtransactions;

      revenues fromCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, which was released in June 2017; and

      higher revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: WWII, which was released in November 2017, as compared toCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, the comparable 2016 title.

            The increase was partially offset by:

      lower revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title; and

      lower revenues from the Skylanders franchise, due to the release ofSkylanders Imaginators in October 2016, with no comparable release in 2017.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in consolidated net revenues for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      new revenues from King titles following the King Closing Date, primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise;

      revenues recognized fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016; and

      higher revenues recognized in 2016 fromCall of Duty: Black Ops III, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015 and was the third game in our successful Black Ops series, as compared to revenues recognized in 2015 fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014, including, in each case, the associated digital content.

            The increase was partially offset by:

      lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise, asDestiny debuted in September 2014 but had no comparable full-game release in 2015;

      lower revenues fromSkylanders Imaginators, which was released in October 2016, as compared toSkylanders Superchargers, the comparable 2015 title, as well as lower revenues from standalone toys and accessories from the Skylanders franchise in 2016; and

      lower revenues recognized from the Diablo franchise due to the timing of releases.

    Table of Contents

    Change in Deferred Revenues Recognized

      2017 vs. 2016

            The decrease in net deferred revenues recognized for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      a net deferral of revenues for the Destiny franchise, primarily due toDestiny 2, which was released in September 2017, as compared to net deferred revenues recognized in the comparable prior period; and

      a higher net deferral of revenues from the Call of Duty franchise, primarily due to the stronger performance ofCall of Duty: WWII in the fourth quarter of 2017, as compared toCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare in the fourth quarter of 2016.

            The decrease was partially offset by:

      net deferred revenues recognized fromOverwatch in 2017, as compared to a net deferral of revenues in 2016 due to the release ofOverwatch in May 2016; and

      net deferred revenues recognized fromWorld of Warcraft in 2017, as compared to a net deferral of revenues in 2016 due to the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Legion in August 2016.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The decrease in net deferred revenues recognized for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      deferrals of revenues associated with the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Legion in August 2016, as compared to the recognition of deferred revenues in 2015 from the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor® in November 2014; and

      deferrals of revenues associated withOverwatch.

            The decrease was partially offset by lower deferrals of revenues associated with the Call of Duty franchise, driven by lower revenue deferrals fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2016, as compared toCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title.

    Foreign Exchange Impact

            Changes in foreign exchange rates had a positive impact of $42 million, a negative impact of $81 million, and a negative impact of $373 million on Activision Blizzard's consolidated net revenues in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the previous year. The changes are primarily due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and the British pound.

    Operating Segment Results

            Currently, we have three reportable segments. Our operating segments are consistent with our internal organizational structure, the manner in which our operations are reviewed and managed by our Chief Executive Officer, who is our Chief Operating Decision Makerchief operating decision maker ("CODM"), the manner in which we assess operating performance and allocate resources, and the availability of separate financial information. Currently, we have two reportable operating segments (see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Previously, we reported "Distribution" as a reportable segment. In the current period, this was no longer deemed a reportable segment and is included in "Other" along with our recently announced Media Networks and Studios businesses. We do not aggregate operating segments.

    The CODM reviews segment performance exclusive ofof: the impact of the change in deferred revenues and related cost of salesrevenues with respect to certain of our online-enabled games, stock-basedgames; share-based compensation expense,expense; amortization of intangible assets as a result of purchase price accounting, andaccounting; fees and other expenses (including legal fees, costs, expenses, and accruals) related to acquisitions, associated integration activities, and the Purchase Transaction.financings; certain restructuring costs; and certain other non-cash charges. The CODM does not review any information regarding total assets on an operating segment basis, and accordingly, no disclosure is made with respect thereto.


    Table of Contents

            Our operating segments are also consistent with our internal organization structure, the way we assess operating performance and allocate resources, and the availability of separate financial information. We do not aggregate operating segments. As discussed in the "Business Overview" above, commencing with the second quarter of 2017, we made changes to our operating segments which reflect the changes in our organization and reporting structure. Our MLG business, which was previously included in the non-reportable "Other segments," is now presented within the Blizzard reportable segment. Prior period amounts have been revised to reflect this change. This change had no impact on consolidated net revenues or operating income.

            Information on the reportable segments net revenues and segment operating segmentsincome are presented below (amounts in millions):

     
     For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Increase / (decrease) 2017 v 2016 
     
     Activision Blizzard King Total Activision Blizzard King Total 

    Segment Revenues

                             

    Net revenues from external customers

     $2,628 $2,120 $1,998 $6,746 $408 $(319)$412 $501 

    Intersegment net revenues(1)

        19    19    19    19 

    Segment net revenues

     $2,628 $2,139 $1,998 $6,765 $408 $(300)$412 $520 

    Segment operating income

     
    $

    1,005
     
    $

    712
     
    $

    700
     
    $

    2,417
     
    $

    217
     
    $

    (283

    )

    $

    163
     
    $

    97
     


     
     For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Increase / (decrease) 2016 v 2015 
     
     Activision Blizzard King Total Activision Blizzard King Total 

    Segment Revenues

                             

    Net revenues from external customers

     $2,220 $2,439 $1,586 $6,245 $(480)$874 $1,586 $1,980 

    Intersegment net revenues(1)

                     

    Segment net revenues

     $2,220 $2,439 $1,586 $6,245 $(480)$874 $1,586 $1,980 

    Segment operating income

     
    $

    788
     
    $

    995
     
    $

    537
     
    $

    2,320
     
    $

    (80

    )

    $

    434
     
    $

    537
     
    $

    891
     


     
     For the Year Ended December 31, 2015  
      
      
      
     
     
     Activision Blizzard King Total  
      
      
      
     

    Segment Revenues

                             

    Net revenues from external customers

     $2,700 $1,565 $ $4,265             

    Intersegment net revenues(1)

                         

    Segment net revenues

     $2,700 $1,565 $ $4,265             

    Segment operating income

     
    $

    868
     
    $

    561
     
    $

     
    $

    1,429
      
     
      
     
      
     
      
     
     

    (1)
    Intersegment revenues reflect licensing and reconciliationsservice fees charged between segments.

    Table of Contents

            Reconciliations of total segment net revenues and total segment operating income to consolidated net revenues from external customers and consolidated income before income


    Table of Contents

    tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 are presented in the table below (amounts in millions):

     
     For the Years Ended December 31, 
     
     2015 2014 2013 Increase/
    (decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase/
    (decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Segment net revenues:

                    

    Activision

     $2,700 $2,686 $2,895 $14 $(209)

    Blizzard

      1,565  1,720  1,124  (155) 596 

    Other(1)

      356  407  323  (51) 84 

    Segments net revenues total

      4,621  4,813  4,342  (192) 471 

    Reconciliation to consolidated net revenues:

                    

    Net effect from deferral of net revenues

      43  (405) 241  448  (646)

    Consolidated net revenues

     $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 $256 $(175)

    Segment income from operations:

                    

    Activision

      868  762  971  106  (209)

    Blizzard

      561  756  376  (195) 380 

    Other(1)

      37  9  8  28  1 

    Segments income from operations total

      1,466  1,527  1,355  (61) 172 

    Reconciliation to consolidated operating income and consolidated income before income tax expense:

                    

    Net effect from deferral of net revenues and related cost of sales

      (39) (215) 229  176  (444)

    Stock-based compensation expense

      (92) (104) (110) 12  6 

    Amortization of intangible assets

      (11) (12) (23) 1  11 

    Fees and other expenses related to acquisitions and the Purchase Transaction

      (5) (13) (79) 8  66 

    Consolidated operating income

      1,319  1,183  1,372  136  (189)

    Interest and other expense, net

      198  202  53  (4) 149 

    Consolidated income before income tax expense

     $1,121 $981 $1,319 $140 $(338)
     
     For the Years Ended
    December 31,
     
     
     2017 2016 2015 

    Reconciliation to consolidated net revenues:

              

    Segment net revenues

     $6,765 $6,245 $4,265 

    Revenues from other segments(1)

      410  354  356 

    Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues(2)

      (139) 9  43 

    Elimination of intersegment revenues(3)

      (19)    

    Consolidated net revenues

     $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 

    Reconciliation to consolidated income before income tax expense:

              

    Segment operating income

     $2,417 $2,320 $1,429 

    Operating (loss) income from other segments(1)

      (19) 14  37 

    Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues and related cost of revenues(2)

      (71) (10) (39)

    Share-based compensation expense

      (178) (159) (92)

    Amortization of intangible assets(4)

      (757) (706) (11)

    Fees and other expenses related to the King Acquisition(5)

      (15) (47) (5)

    Restructuring costs(6)

      (15)    

    Other non-cash charges(7)

      (14)    

    Discrete tax-related items(8)

      (39)    

    Consolidated operating income

      1,309  1,412  1,319 

    Interest and other expense (income), net

      146  214  198 

    Loss on extinguishment of debt

      12  92   

    Consolidated income before income tax expense

     $1,151 $1,106 $1,121 

    (1)
    Other includesIncludes other income and expenses from operating segments managed outside the reportable segments, including our Media Networks, Studios and Distribution businesses. Other alsoAlso includes unallocated corporate income and expenses.

            For a better understanding of the differences in presentation between our segment results and the consolidated results, the following explains the nature of each reconciling item.

    Net Effect from Deferral of Net Revenues and Related Cost of Sales

    (2)
    We have determined that some of our titles' online functionality represents an essential component of gameplay and, as a result, represents a more-than-inconsequential separate deliverable. As such, we are required to recognize revenues from these titles over the estimated service periods, which are generally less than one year.twelve months. The related costscost of salesrevenues are deferred and recognized when the related revenues are recognized. In the operating segment results table, we presentreflect the amountnet effect from the deferrals of net revenues and (recognition) of deferred revenues, along with the related costscost of sales separately for each period as a resultrevenues, on certain of this accounting treatment.


    Table of Contents

    Stock-Based Compensation Expense

            We expense our stock-based awards using the grant date fair value over the vesting periods of the stock awards. In the case of liability awards, the liability is subject to revaluation based on the stock price at the end of the relevant period. Included within this stock-based compensation are the net effects of capitalization, deferral,online enabled products.

    (3)
    Intersegment revenues reflect licensing and amortization.

    Amortization of Intangible Assets

    service fees charged between segments.

    (4)
    We amortize intangible assets over their estimated useful lives based on the pattern of consumption of the underlying economic benefits. The amountamounts presented in the table representsrepresent the effect of the amortization of intangible assets as well as other purchase price accounting adjustments, where applicable, in our consolidated statements of operations.

    Fees and Other Expenses Related to Acquisitions and the Purchase Transaction

            We incurred

    (5)
    Reflects fees and other expenses such as legal, banking and professional services fees, related to the Purchase Transaction, the King Acquisition, and other business acquisitions, inclusive of related debt financings. Such expenses are not reviewed byfinancings and integration costs.

    (6)
    Reflects restructuring charges, primarily severance costs.

    (7)
    Reflects a non-cash accounting charge to reclassify certain cumulative translation gains (losses) into earnings due to the CODM as partsubstantial liquidation of segment performance.certain of our foreign entities.

    (8)
    Reflects the impact of other unusual or unique tax-related items and activities.

    Table of Contents

    Segment Net Revenues

    Activision

      Activision2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in Activision's net revenues increased slightly for 2015,2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to to:

      higher revenues from the Destiny franchise, driven by the release ofDestiny 2 in September 2017, with no comparable release in 2016;

      higher revenues fromCall of Duty franchise, specificallyDuty: WWII, which was released in November 2017, as compared toCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, the comparable 2016 title;

      higher revenues from from the continued strength ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared to prior catalog releases, driven by the downloadable content pack,Zombies Chronicles, which was released in May 2017, and the fourth quartercontinued strength of 2015, as compared tomicrotransactions; and

      revenues fromCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, which was released in June 2017.

            The increase was partially offset by:

      lower revenues fromCall of Duty: AdvancedInfinite Warfare including its associated digital content, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title; and

      lower revenues from the Skylanders franchise, due to the release ofSkylanders Imaginators in October 2016, with no comparable release in 2017.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The decrease in Activision's net revenues for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      lower revenues fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014, and the strong digital content performance, including expansion packs and supply drops for2016, as compared toCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareBlack Ops III. Additionally, revenue increased due, the comparable 2015 title, which was the third game in our successful Black Ops series;

      lower revenues from the Destiny franchise, as there were two expansion packs in 2015—House of Wolves andThe Taken King—but only one in 2016—Rise of Iron;

      lower revenues fromSkylanders Imaginators, which was released in October 2016, as compared toSkylanders Superchargers, the comparable 2015 title, as well as lower revenues from standalone Skylanders toys and accessories in 2016; and

      lower revenues fromGuitar Hero Live, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015 with no comparable release in the prior-year. These increases were2016.

            The decrease was partially offset by higher revenues from digital content associated withCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared toCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, the comparable 2014 title.

    Blizzard

      2017 vs. 2016

            The decrease in Blizzard's net revenues for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      lower revenues fromSkylanders SuperChargersOverwatch, which was released in the current year, as compared toSkylanders Trap Team, the comparable prior-year title, lower revenues from the Destiny franchise asDestiny debuted in September 2014 with no comparable full-game release in 2015, and lower revenues fromThe Amazing Spider-Man 2, which was released during the prior-year with no corresponding release during 2015.

              Activision's net revenues decreased for 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily due to lower revenues from the Call of Duty and Skylanders franchises, partially offset by higher revenues from the release ofDestiny and its first expansion pack,The Dark Below, in 2014.

      Blizzard

              Blizzard's net revenues decreased for 2015, as compared to 2014, primarily due to the timing of game releases; most notablyDiablo III: Reaper of Souls™, which was released in March 2014 on the PC,Diablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition™, which was released in August 2014 on consoles,May 2016; andWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor®

      , which was released in November 2014, along with the overall lower revenues fromWorld of Warcraft, driven by the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Legion in August 2016, with no comparable release in 2017.

    Table of Contents

            The decrease was partially offset by:

      revenues recognized from franchise sales of city-based teams for the Overwatch League; and

      higher revenues fromDiablo III, primarily due to the release ofRise of the Necromancer, a smaller subscriber base. These decreasesdownloadable content pack forDiablo III that was released in June 2017.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in Blizzard's net revenues for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      revenues fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016; and

      higher revenues fromWorld of Warcraft, driven by the release ofWorld of Warcraft: Legion in August 2016, with no comparable release in 2015.

    King

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in King's net revenues for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      2017 including King revenues for the full year, while 2016 only included King revenues for the partial period following the King Closing Date; and

      higher revenues from the Candy Crush franchise, due to in-game events and features.

      2016 vs. 2015

            King's 2016 net revenues represent the net revenues from the King Closing Date through December 31, 2016. The revenues were primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise, which included the release ofCandy Crush Jelly Saga™ in January 2016.

    Segment Income from Operations

    Activision

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in Activision's operating income for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to higher revenues, as discussed above, and lower costs associated with the Skylanders franchise, as there was not a new title released in 2017.

            The increase was partially offset by higher revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, which had multiple content releases throughoutsales and marketing spend on the year, along with revenues fromHeroes of the Storm andStarcraft II: Legacy of the Void, which were released in 2015. In addition to already having been released on PC, iPad, and Android tablets in the prior-year,Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft was released on iPhone and Android smartphones in April 2015, which contributedDestiny franchise due to the current period revenue performance.release ofDestiny 2.

              Blizzard's net revenues increased2016 vs. 2015

            The decrease in Activision's operating income for 2014,2016, as compared to 2013,2015, was primarily due to lower revenues, fromas discussed above. This was partially offset by:

      lower sales and marketing spend onDiablo III: Reaper of Souls,Guitar Hero Live which was released in March 2014 onand the PC,Destiny franchise given the timing of game launches; andDiablo III: Reaper of

      the relative increase in revenues coming from the digital online channel, which typically has a higher profit margin.

    Table of Contents

    Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition,Blizzard

      which was released2017 vs. 2016

            The decrease in August 2014 on certain consoles, revenue from value-added services as a result of the launch of theWorld of Warcraft paid character boost, revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, which was released in November 2014, and revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, which was commercially released in 2014,Blizzard's operating income for 2017, as compared to revenues in 2013 fromStarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm®, which2016, was released in March 2013, and fromDiablo III on consoles, which was released in September 2013.

    Segment Income from Operations

    Activision

            Activision's operating income increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, primarily due to an increased percentage of revenues coming from the higher margin online digital channels, and lower sales and marketing spending on the Destiny franchise because of the September 2014 launch ofDestiny with no comparable full-game release in the current year. This is partially offset by operating losses fromGuitar Hero Live, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015, with no comparable release in the prior-year, and lower revenues fromSkylanders SuperChargers as compared toSkylanders Trap Team.

            Activision's operating income decreased in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily due to lower revenues, as describeddiscussed above, relativelyalong with higher cost of sales—software royalties and amortization, and higher sales and marketing activities from the release ofDestiny; partially offset by lower cost of sales—product development costs as a result of lower revenues, and lower general and administrative costs, primarily resulting from lower legal-related expenses (including legal-related accruals, settlements and fees).

    Blizzard

            Blizzard's operating income decreased in 2015, as compared to 2014, primarily due to lower revenues, as described above; higher costs of sales—product costs fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft related to commissions on mobile purchases with the launch on iPhone and Android smartphones in April 2015; higher sales and marketing spending for its releases, includingHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft andHeroes of the Storm; lower capitalization of software development costs;costs due to the timing of game development cycles.

            The decrease was partially offset by lower sales and higher costmarketing costs and software amortization forOverwatch andWorld of sales—software royalties and amortization.Warcraft: Legion, due to their respective launches in 2016, with no comparable releases in 2017.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in Blizzard's operating income increased in 2014,for 2016, as compared to 2013,2015, was primarily due to higher revenues, as described above,revenues. This was partially offset by higher cost of sales—product costs, higher product development costs and higherby:

      new sales and marketing activitiesspending to support a Overwatch; and

      higher numberpersonnel costs due to segment performance bonuses and increased headcount to support the business growth.

    King

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in King's operating income for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      2017 including King's results of titles released in 2014.operations for the full year, while 2016 only included King's results of operations for the partial period following the King Closing Date; and

      higher revenues from the Candy Crush franchise, as discussed above.

      2016 vs. 2015

            King's operating income for the year ended December 31, 2016 represents the operating income from the King Closing Date through December 31, 2016.

    Foreign Exchange Impact

            Changes in foreign exchange rates had a positive impact of $85 million, a negative impact of $364$30 million, and a negative impact of $338 million on Activision Blizzard'sreportable segment net revenues for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, as compared to the same periodperiods in the previous year. The changes are primarily due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and British pound.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

            The analysis of revenues by distribution channel is presented both on a GAAP (including the impact from the change in deferred revenues) and non-GAAP (excluding the impact from the change in deferred revenues) basis. We use this non-GAAP measure internally when evaluating our operating performance, when planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods, and when assessing the performance of our management team. We believe this is appropriate because this non-GAAP measure enables an analysis of performance based on the timing of actual transactions with our customers, which is consistent with the way the Company is measured by investment analysts and industry data


    Table of Contents

    sources, and facilitates comparison of operating performance between periods. In addition, excluding the impact from the change in deferred net revenue provides a much more timely indication of trends in our sales and other operating results. While we believe that this non-GAAP measure is useful in evaluating our business, this information should be considered as supplemental in nature and is not meant to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or as more important than, the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, this non-GAAP financial measure may not be the same as any non-GAAP measure presented by another company. This non-GAAP financial measure has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the items associated with our GAAP revenues. We compensate for the limitations resulting from the exclusion of the change in deferred revenues by considering the impact of that item separately and by considering our GAAP, as well as non-GAAP, revenues.

    Consolidated Results of Operations—Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013

    Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNet Revenues by Distribution Channel

            The following table provides reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAPdetails our consolidated net revenues by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (amounts in millions):


     For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 

     2015 2014 2013 Increase/
    (decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase/
    (decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     % Change
    2015 v 2014
     % Change
    2014 v 2013
      2017 2016 2015 Increase/
    (decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase/
    (decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     % Change
    2017 v 2016
     % Change
    2016 v 2015
     

    GAAP net revenues by distribution channel

                   

    Net revenues by distribution channel

                   

    Digital online channels(1)

     $5,479 $4,865 $2,502 $614 $2,363 13% 94%

    Retail channels

     $1,806 $2,104 $2,701 $(298)$(597) (14)% (22)% 1,033 1,386 1,806 (353) (420) (25) (23)

    Digital online channels(1)

     2,502 1,897 1,559 605 338 32 22 

    Total Activision and Blizzard

     4,308 4,001 4,260 307 (259) 8 (6)

    Other(2)

     356 407 323 (51) 84 (13) 26  505 357 356 148 1 41  

    Total consolidated GAAP net revenues

     4,664 4,408 4,583 256 (175) 6 (4)

    Change in deferred net revenues(3)

                   

    Retail channels

     (169) 104 (247) (273) 351     

    Digital online channels(1)

     126 301 6 (175) 295     

    Total changes in deferred net revenues

     (43) 405 (241) (448) 646     

    Non-GAAP net revenues by distribution channel

                   

    Retail channels

     1,637 2,208 2,454 (571) (246) (26) (10)

    Digital online channels(1)

     2,628 2,198 1,565 430 633 20 40 

    Total Activision and Blizzard

     4,265 4,406 4,019 (141) 387 (3) 10 

    Other(2)

     356 407 323 (51) 84 (13) 26 

    Total non-GAAP net revenues(4)

     $4,621 $4,813 $4,342 $(192)$471 (4)% 11%

    Total consolidated net revenues

     $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 $409 $1,944 6% 42%

    (1)
    We defineNet revenues from digital"Digital online channels aschannels" include revenues from digitally distributeddigitally-distributed subscriptions, licensing royalties, value-added services, downloadable content, microtransactions, and products.

    (2)
    Net revenues from Other"Other" include revenues from our Media NetworksStudios and StudiosDistribution businesses, along withas well as revenues that were historically shown as "Distribution."from MLG and the Overwatch League.

    Digital Online Channel Net Revenues

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in net revenues from digital online channels for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      higher revenues from King titles, as 2017 includes King revenues for the full year, while 2016 only included King revenues for the partial period following the King Closing Date, as well as higher revenues from the Candy Crush franchise due to in-game events and features; and

      higher revenues recognized from the continued strength ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared to prior catalog releases, driven by the downloadable content pack,Zombies Chronicles, which was released in May 2017, and the continued strength of microtransactions.

            The increase was partially offset by lower revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, which was released in November 2016, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in net revenues from digital online channels for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      new revenues from King titles following the King Closing Date, primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise;

      revenues recognized fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016; and

      higher revenues recognized in 2016 from digital content associated withCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared to revenues recognized in 2015 from digital content associated withCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, the comparable 2015 title.

    Table of Contents

    (3)
    We have determined that some of our titles' online functionality represents an essential component of gameplay and as a result, represents a more-than inconsequential separate deliverable. As such, we recognize revenues attributed to these titles over the estimated service periods, which are generally less than one year. In the table above, we present the amount of net revenues for each period as a result of this accounting treatment.

    (4)
    Total non-GAAP net revenues presented, also represents our total segment net revenues.

    Retail Channel Net Revenues

      2017 vs. 2016

            The decrease in GAAP net revenues from retail channels for 2015,2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to lower revenues fromto:

      Skylanders SuperChargers, which was released in the current year, as compared toSkylanders Trap Team, the comparable prior-year title, lower revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: AdvancedInfinite Warfare, which was released in November 2016, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title; and

      lower revenues from the Skylanders franchise, due to the release ofSkylanders Imaginators in October 2016, with no comparable release in 2017.

            The decrease was partially offset by:

      revenues fromCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, which was released in June 2017; and

      higher revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: WWII, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014,November 2017, as compared toCall of Duty: GhostsInfinite Warfare, the comparable 2016 title.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The decrease in net revenues from retail channels for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise, asDestiny debuted in September 2014 but had no comparable full-game release in 2015;

      lower revenues fromSkylanders Imaginators, which was released in October 2016, as compared toSkylanders Superchargers, the comparable 2015 title, as well as lower revenues from standalone Skylanders toys and accessories in 2016; and

      lower revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2013, and lower revenues recognized fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls andDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, which were released in March 2014 on PC and in August 2014 on consoles, respectively. The decreases were partially offset by higher revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise and revenues fromGuitar Hero Live, which was released in October 2015.

              The decrease in GAAP net revenues from retail channels for 2014, as compared to 2013, was primarily due to lower revenues from the Call of Duty and Skylanders franchises. The decreases were partially offset by revenues fromDestiny, which was released in September 2014, and revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014 on the PC, andDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, which was released in August 2014 on certain consoles.

              The decrease in non-GAAP net revenues from retail channels for 2015, as compared to 2014, was primarily due to lower revenues fromDestiny, which launched in September 2014 with no comparable full-game release in the current year, fromSkylanders SuperChargers, which was released in the current year,2016, as compared toSkylanders Trap Team, the comparable prior-year title, and from the Diablo franchise due to timingCall of title releases. This was partially offset by revenues fromGuitar Hero LiveDuty: Black Ops III, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015, with no comparable release2015.

            The decrease was partially offset by:

      revenues recognized fromOverwatch, which was released in the prior-year,May 2016; and

      higher revenues recognized in 2016 fromCall of Duty: Black Ops III, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015, as compared to revenues recognized in 2015 fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014.

              The decrease in non-GAAP net revenues from retail channels for 2014, as compared to 2013, was primarily due to lower revenues from the Call of Duty and Skylanders franchises. The decreases were partially offset by revenues fromDestiny, which was released in September 2014, and revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014 on the PC andDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, which was released in August 2014 on certain consoles, as compared to revenues from the September 2013 release ofDiablo III on the PS3 and Xbox 360.

      Digital Channel Net Revenues

              The increase in GAAP net revenues from digital online channels for 2015, as compared to 2014, was primarily due to: higher revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise; higher revenues recognized fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft; higher revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare and its digital content released during the current period, as compared toCall of Duty: Ghosts and its digital content released during the prior period, including revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare's new digital content known as "supply drops;" and revenues recognized fromHeroes of the Storm, which was released in June 2015 with no comparable release during the prior periods. The increases were partially offset by lower revenues from the Diablo franchise due to the timing of title releases.


    Table of Contents

            The increase in GAAP net revenues from digital online channels for 2014, as compared to 2013, was primarily due to higher revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, value-added services revenues from the launch of theWorld of Warcraft paid character boost, revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014 on the PC, andDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, which was released in August 2014 on certain consoles, and the release ofDestiny and its first expansion pack,The Dark Below, and higher digital download revenues fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare. The increases were partially offset by lower revenues recognized fromStarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm, which was released in March 2013, lower revenues recognized fromWorld of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria®, which was released in September 2012, and lower downloadable content revenues from the Call of Duty franchise.

            The increase in non-GAAP net revenues from digital online channels for 2015, as compared to 2014, was primarily due to: revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft; revenues fromDestiny and its associated expansion packs, includingThe Taken King which was released in September 2015; higher revenues from the Call of Duty franchise, specifically fromCall of Duty: Black Ops III, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015, as compared toCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014, and from the strong digital content performance, including expansion packs and supply drops, ofCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare; and revenues fromHeroes of the Storm, which was released in June 2015 with no comparable release during the prior periods. These increases were partially offset by lower revenues fromWorld of Warcraft, primarily due to a decline in the subscriber base and the launch ofWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor in November 2014 with no comparable release in the current year, and lower revenues recognized from the Diablo franchise due to the timing of title releases.

            The increase in non-GAAP net revenues from digital online channels for 2014, as compared to 2013, was primarily due to revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, value-added services revenues from the launch of theWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor paid character boost, revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014 on the PC, andDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, which was released in August 2014 on certain consoles, revenues from the release ofDestiny and its first expansion pack,The Dark Below, and higher digital downloads ofCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare. The increases were partially offset by lower downloadable content revenues from the Call of Duty franchise.

    Consolidated Results

    Net Revenues by Geographic Region

            The following table details our consolidated net revenues by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (amounts in millions):


     For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 

     2015 2014 2013 Increase/
    (decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase/
    (decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     % Change
    2015 v 2014
     % Change
    2014 v 2013
      2017 2016 2015 Increase/
    (decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase/
    (decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     % Change
    2017 v 2016
     % Change
    2016 v 2015
     

    Geographic region net revenues:

                                  

    North America

     $2,409 $2,190 $2,414 $219 $(224) 10% (9)%

    Europe

     1,741 1,824 1,826 (83) (2) (5)  

    Americas

     $3,607 $3,423 $2,409 $184 $1,014 5% 42%

    EMEA(1)

     2,464 2,221 1,741 243 480 11 28 

    Asia Pacific

     514 394 343 120 51 30 15  946 964 514 (18) 450 (2) 88 

    Consolidated net revenues

     $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 $256 $(175) 6 (4) $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 $409 $1,944 6 42 

    (1)
    Consists of the Europe, Middle East, and Africa geographic regions.

    Americas

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in net revenues in the Americas region for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to:

      higher revenues from King titles, as 2017 includes King's revenues for the full year, while 2016 only included King's revenues for the partial period following the King Closing Date, as well as higher revenues from the Candy Crush franchise due to in-game events and features;

      higher revenues recognized from the continued strength ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, as compared to prior catalog releases, driven by the downloadable content pack,Zombies Chronicles, which was released in May 2017, and the continued strength of microtransactions; and

      revenues fromCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, which was released in June 2017.

            The increase was partially offset by lower revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, which was released in November 2016, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, the comparable 2015 title.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in net revenues in the Americas region for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      new revenues from King titles following the King Closing Date, primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise;

      revenues recognized fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016; and

      higher revenues recognized in 2016 fromCall of Duty: Black Ops III, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015, as compared to revenues recognized in 2015 fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014, including, in each case, the associated digital content.

    Table of Contents

            The increase/(decrease) in deferred revenues recognized by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013increase was as follows (amounts in millions):partially offset by:

     
     For the Years Ended December 31, 
     
     2015 2014 2013 Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Increase/(decrease) in deferred revenues recognized by geographic region:

                    

    North America

     $55 $(206)$108 $261 $(314)

    Europe

      20  (153) 107  173  (260)

    Asia Pacific

      (32) (46) 26  14  (72)

    Total impact on consolidated net revenues

     $43 $(405)$241 $448 $(646)

      Consolidated Net Revenues

              Consolidated net revenues in the North America region increased in 2015 as compared to 2014, primarily due to higherlower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise, asDestiny debuted in September 2014 but had no comparable full-game release in 2015; and

      lower revenues fromSkylanders Imaginators, which was released in October 2016, as compared toSkylanders Superchargers, the comparable 2015 title, as well as lower revenues from standalone toys and accessories from the Skylanders franchise in 2016.

    EMEA

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in net revenues in the EMEA region for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to the same drivers and partially offsetting factors as those for the Americas region discussed above, as well as higher revenues from our Distribution business, primarily due to higher sales during the holiday season.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in net revenues in the EMEA region for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to the same drivers and partially offsetting factors as the Americas region, as discussed above.

    Asia Pacific

      2017 vs. 2016

            The slight decrease in net revenues in the Asia Pacific region for 2017, as compared 2016, was primarily due to slightly lower revenues recognized fromOverwatch andHearthstone, mostly offset by higher revenues from King titles andCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in net revenues in the Asia Pacific region for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      new revenues from King titles following the King Closing Date, primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise;

      revenues recognized fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016; and

      higher revenues recognized fromHearthstone: Heroes of WarcraftHearthstone., and revenues recognized fromHeroes of the Storm andGuitar Hero Live, which were both released in 2015 with no comparable releases during the prior periods.

            The increases wereincrease was partially offset by lower revenues fromSkylanders SuperChargers, as compared toSkylanders Trap Team, and lower revenues recognized from the Diablo franchise due to the timing of title releases.

            Consolidated net revenues in the Europe region decreased in 2015 as compared to 2014, primarily due to lower revenues recognized from the Diablo and Call of Duty franchises, lower revenues fromSkylanders SuperChargers, as compared toSkylanders Trap Team, and lower revenues from our Distribution business. These were partially offset by higher revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise, higher revenues recognized fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, and revenues recognized fromHeroes of the Storm.

            Consolidated net revenues in the Asia Pacific region increased in 2015 as compared to 2014, primarily due to higher revenues recognized fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, Call of Duty Online, andHeroes of the Storm, which launched in China in 2015 with no comparable prior-year titles. The increases were partially offset by lower revenues from the Diablo franchise.

            Consolidated net revenues in all regions decreased in 2014 as compared to 2013, except for the Asia Pacific region. As previously discussed, the decrease in the Company's consolidated net revenues in 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013, was mainly due to lower revenues from the Call of Duty and Skylanders franchises, lower revenues recognized fromStarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm, which was released in March 2013, and lower revenues recognized fromWorld of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria, which was released in September 2012. The decreases were partially offset by the launch ofDestiny and its first expansion pack,The Dark Below, revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, value-added services revenues from the launch of theWorld of Warcraft paid character boost, revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, and revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014 on the PC, andDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, which was released in August 2014 on certain consoles. All of the above factors impact our year-over-year comparisons for North America and Europe. Further, in the Europe region, the decreases were partially offset by the increase in Distribution segment revenues. In the Asia Pacific region, the higher mix of Blizzard segment operations, as compared to Publishing segment operations, resulted in a year-over-year increase in revenues.


    Table of Contents

    Deferred Revenues Recognized

            In all regions, the increase in deferred revenues recognized in 2015, as compared to 2014, was primarily due to lower deferrals of revenue fromDestiny, fromWorld of Warcraft, primarily associated withWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor and value-added services, and from the Diablo franchise. These were partially offset by increased deferrals of revenue from the Call of Duty franchise and deferral of revenues forStarCraft II: Legacy of the Void andGuitar Hero Live, which were released in 2015 with no comparable prior-year releases. Additionally, in the Asia Pacific region there was an increase deferral of revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft.

            In all regions, the decrease in deferred revenues recognized in 2014, as compared to 2013, was primarily attributed to the higher deferral of revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, which was released in November 2014, as compared to the recognition of revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria, which was released in September 2012, deferral of revenues fromDestiny and its first expansion packThe Dark Below, both of which were released in 2014, and the deferral of revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, which was also released in 2014.

    Foreign Exchange Impact

            Changes in foreign exchange rates had a negative impact of $373 million, a negative impact of $2 million, and a positive impact of $33 million on Activision Blizzard's consolidated net revenues in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the previous year. The changes are primarily due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and British pound.

            For the year ended December 31, 2014, given that a significant portion of the Company's GAAP net consolidated revenues is generated in the first half of the fiscal year due to the impact of deferrals, where the euro and British pound strengthened against the U.S dollar as compared to the same period in 2013, the negative impact from the significant weakening of the euro and British pound relative to U.S. dollar in the later stages of 2014 was largely offset in the Company's consolidated net revenues for the full year 2014.

    Net Revenues by Platform

            The following tables detail our net revenues by platform and as a percentage of total consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (amounts in millions):

     
     Year
    Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    total(4)
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year
    Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    total(4)
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year
    Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    total(4)
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2015 v
    2014
     Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2014 v
    2013
     

    Platform net revenues:

                             

    Online(1)

     $851  18%$867  20%$912  20%$(16)$(45)

    PC

      648  14  551  13  340  7  97  211 

    Next-generation (PS4, Xbox One, Wii U)

      1,492  32  720  16  92  2  772  628 

    Prior-generation (PS3, Xbox 360, Wii)           

      899  19  1,430  32  2,287  50  (531) (857)

    Total Console

      2,391  51  2,150  49  2,379  52  241  (229)

    Mobile and ancillary(2)

      418  9  433  10  629  14  (15) (196)

    Total Activision Blizzard

      4,308  92  4,001  91  4,260  93  307  (259)

    Other(3)

      356  8  407  9  323  7  (51) 84 

    Total consolidated net revenues

     $4,664  100%$4,408  100%$4,583  100%$256 $(175)

    Table of Contents

            The increase / (decrease) in deferred revenues recognized by platform for years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was as follows (amounts in millions):


     For the Years Ended December 31,  Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    total(3)
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    total(3)
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    total(3)
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

     2015 2014 2013 Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase/
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Increase/(decrease) in deferred revenues recognized by platform:

               

    Online(1)

     $138 $(168)$107 $306 $(275)

    Platform net revenues:

                     

    Console

     $2,389 34%$2,453 37%$2,391 51%$(64)$62 

    PC

     (82) (41) 22 (41) (63) 2,042 29 2,124 32 1,499 32 (82) 625 

    Next-generation (PS4, Xbox One, Wii U)

     (252) (477) (213) 225 (264)

    Prior-generation (PS3, Xbox 360, Wii)

     274 295 324 (21) (29)

    Mobile and ancillary(1)

     2,081 30 1,674 25 418 9 407 1,256 

    Other(2)

     505 7 357 5 356 8 148 1 

    Total console

     22 (182) 111 204 (293)

    Mobile and ancillary(2)

     (35) (14) 1 (21) (15)

    Total impact on consolidated net revenues

     $43 $(405)$241 $448 $(646)

    Total consolidated net revenues

     $7,017 100%$6,608 100%$4,664 100%$409 $1,944 

    (1)
    Revenues from online consists ofNet revenues from allWorld of Warcraftproducts, including subscriptions, boxed products, expansion packs, licensing royalties,"Mobile and value-added services.

    (2)
    Revenues from mobile and ancillary includesancillary" include revenues from handheld, mobile and tablet devices, as well as non-platform specificnon-platform-specific game-related revenues, such as standalone sales of toys and accessories products from our Skylanders franchise and other physical merchandise and accessories.

    (3)(2)
    Net revenues from Other"Other" include revenues from our Media NetworksStudios and StudiosDistribution businesses, along withas well as revenues that were historically shown as "Distribution."from MLG and the Overwatch League.

    (4)(3)
    The percentages of total are presented as calculated. Therefore, the sum of these percentages, as presented, may differ due to the impact of rounding.

    Console Net Revenues

      2017 vs. 2016

            The decrease in net revenues from online decreased slightly in 2015,console for 2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to lower revenues recognized fromWorldCall of WarcraftDuty: Infinite Warfare, which was released November 2016, as compared to the performance ofCall of Duty: Black Ops III, subscriber levels. This wasthe comparable 2015 title. The decrease is partially offset by revenueby:

      higher revenues recognized from the expansioncontinued strength ofWorldCall of Warcraft: WarlordsDuty: Black Ops III, as compared to prior catalog releases, driven by the downloadable content pack,Zombies Chronicles, which was released in May 2017, and the continued strength of Draenormicrotransactions;

      revenues fromCrash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, which was released in June 2017; and

      higher revenues recognized fromCall of Duty: WWII, which was released in November 2014, and from associated value-added services including a paid character boost.2017, as compared toCall of Duty: Infinite Warfare, the comparable 2016 title.

      2016 vs. 2015

            Net        The increase in net revenues from online decreased in 2014,console for 2016, as compared to 2013,2015, was primarily due to the deferral ofto:

      higher revenues recognized in 2016 fromWorldCall of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, as compared to the recognition of revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Mists of PandariaDuty: Black Ops III, which was released in September 2012, and lower subscription revenues fromWorldthe fourth quarter of Warcraft. The decrease was partially offset by the strong performance of value-added services revenues driven by the launch of theWorld of Warcraft paid character boost.

              Net revenues from PC increased in 2015, as compared to revenues recognized in 2015 fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014, primarily due to higher including, in each case, the associated digital content; and

      revenues recognized fromHearthstone: Heroes of WarcraftOverwatch and revenues recognized from, which was released in May 2016.

    Heroes of the Storm. This        The increase was partially offset by lower revenues recognized in 2015 from the Destiny franchise, asDiablo III: Reaper of SoulsDestiny, due to the title releasing debuted in MarchSeptember 2014 andbut had no comparable titlefull-game release in 2015.

            Net revenues from PC increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily due to revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft, which had no comparable title in 2013, and higher revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014, as compared to revenues from the release ofStarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm, which was released in March 2013.

            Net revenues from next-generation consoles increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, and increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, in each case primarily due to increased consumer adoption of the PS4


    Table of Contents

    and Xbox One and an increasePC Net Revenues

      2017 vs. 2016

            The decrease in the number of titles released for the next-generation console platforms. Since the introduction of the PS4 and Xbox One in the fourth quarter of 2013, we have released the following titles, among others, on next-generation consoles:Call of Duty: Ghosts andSkylanders SWAP Force™ in the fourth quarter of 2013;The Amazing Spider-Man™ 2 andTransformers™: Rise of the Dark Spark in the second quarter of 2014;Diablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition andDestiny in the third quarter of 2014, andCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare andSkylanders Trap Team in the fourth quarter of 2014. In 2015, we have released multiple expansions or map packs forDestiny andCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare on the next-generation consoles along with major new titles includingCall of Duty: Black Ops III,Skylanders SuperChargers, andGuitar Hero Live.

            Netnet revenues from prior-generation consoles decreased in 2015,PC for 2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to to:

      lower revenues from the Call of Duty and Skylanders franchises and from the transition of players from prior-generation to next-generation platforms. The decreases were partially offset by higher revenues recognized from the Destiny franchiseWorld of Warcraft franchise; and

      lower revenues recognized fromGuitar Hero Live.

              Net revenues from prior-generation consoles decreased in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily due to lower revenues from the Call of Duty and Skylanders franchises. The decreases were partially offset by revenues fromDestinyOverwatch, the recognition of previously deferred revenues fromDiablo III for the PS3 and the Xbox 360, which was released in September 2013, andMay 2016.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in net revenues from the release ofPC for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      revenues recognized fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil EditionOverwatch., which was released in May 2016; and

      revenues from King titles following the King Closing Date.

    Mobile and Ancillary Net Revenues

              Net2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in net revenues from mobile and ancillary decreased slightly in 2015,for 2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to higher revenues from King titles, as 2017 includes King's revenues for the full year, while 2016 only included King's revenues for the partial period following the King Closing Date, as well as higher revenues from the Candy Crush franchise due to in-game events and features.

            The increase was partially offset by lower revenues from sales of standalone toys and accessories from the Skylanders franchise.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The decrease was partially offset by higher revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft on iOS and Android devices.

            Netincrease in net revenues from mobile and ancillary decreased in 2014,for 2016, as compared to 2013,2015, was primarily due toto:

      new revenues from King titles following the King Closing Date, which were primarily driven by the Candy Crush franchise; and

      higher revenues recognized fromHearthstone, which was released on iPhone and Android smartphones in April 2015.

            The increase was partially offset by lower revenues from sales of standalone toys and accessories from the Skylanders franchise and from handheld titles. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in mobile and tablet platform revenues from the release ofHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft on the iPad and Android tablets in 2014.

            Deferred revenues recognized for online increased in 2015, as compared to 2014, primarily due to the recognition of deferred revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor and from value-added services revenues forWorld of Warcraft, including paid character boosts.

            Deferred revenues recognized for online decreased in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily due to the deferral of revenues fromWorld of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor, the deferral of value-added services revenues primarily from the launch of theWorld of Warcraft paid character boost, and lower revenues recognized fromWorld of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria, which was released in September 2012.

            Deferred revenues recognized for PC decreased in 2015, as compared to 2014, primarily due to deferral of revenues fromStarCraft II: Legacy of the Void, which was released in November 2015, fromHeroes of the Storm, and fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft. This was partially offset by the recognition of deferred revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls following its release in March 2014.

            The decrease in deferred revenues recognized for PC in 2014, as compared to 2013, was due to the deferral of revenues fromHearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft and the higher deferral of revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls, which was released in March 2014, as compared to revenues deferred fromStarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm, which was released in March 2013.

            The increase in deferred revenues recognized for next-generation consoles in 2015, as compared to 2014, was primarily due to the recognition of deferred revenues onDestiny, which was released in September 2014, without a comparable release in the 2015, and revenues recognized from the Diablo franchise due to the timing of title releases. These increases were partially offset by revenues deferred from the Call of Duty franchise and from the release ofGuitar Hero Live in the current year.franchise.


    Table of Contents

            The decrease in deferred revenues recognized for next-generation consoles in 2014, as compared to 2013, was due to the higher deferral of revenues fromCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in November 2014, as compared to revenues deferred fromCall of Duty: Ghosts, which was released in November 2013, and the deferral of revenues fromDestiny, which was released in September 2014. As discussed above, the PS4 and Xbox One were introduced in the fourth quarter of 2013 and we have since released several titles, which were available on next-generation consoles for the full year in 2014, as compared to a partial year in 2013.

            The decrease in deferred revenues recognized for prior-generation consoles in 2015, as compared to 2014, was due to lower deferred revenues recognized from the Call of Duty franchise and the deferral of revenues from the releaseGuitar Hero Live in 2015. These were partially offset by recognition of deferred revenues from the Destiny franchise.

            The decrease in deferred revenues recognized for prior-generation consoles in 2014, as compared to 2013, was due to the deferral of revenues from the launch ofDestiny, partially offset by lower deferral of revenues from the Call of Duty franchise and lower deferral of revenues fromDiablo III: Reaper of Souls—Ultimate Evil Edition, as compared to the deferral of revenues fromDiablo III on PS3 and Xbox 360, which was released in 2013.

    Costs and Expenses

    Cost of SalesRevenues

            The following tables detail the components of cost of salesrevenues in dollars and as a percentage of total consolidatedassociated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (amounts in millions):


     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
      Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    associated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    associated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    associated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    Cost of revenues—product sales:

                     

    Product costs

     $921 20%$999 23%$1,053 23%$(78)$(54) $733 35%$741 34%$872 36%$(8)$(131)

    Online

     224 5 232 5 204 4 (8) 28 

    Software royalties and amortization

     412 9 260 6 187 4 152 73 

    Intellectual property licenses

     28  34 1 87 2 (6) (53)

    Software royalties, amortization, intellectual property licenses

     300 14 331 15 370 15 (31) (39)

    Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues:

                     

    Game operations and distribution costs

     984 20 851 19 274 12 133 577 

    Software royalties, amortization, intellectual property licenses

     484 10 471 11 69 3 13 402 

    Total cost of sales

     $1,585 34%$1,525 35%$1,531 33%$60 $(6)

    Total cost of revenues

     $2,501 36%$2,394 36%$1,585 34%$107 $809 

            Total costCost of Revenues—Product Sales:

      2017 vs. 2016

            Product costs for 2017, were comparable to 2016, primarily due to lower product costs from the Skylanders franchise as there was no new release in 2017, offset by higher product costs resulting from the increased revenues of our relatively lower-margin Distribution business.

            The decrease in software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses related to product sales of $1,585 million increased in 2015,for 2017, as compared to total cost of sales of $1,525 million2016, was primarily due to:

      lower software amortization associated withGuitar Hero Live, which was released in 2014,October 2015;

      lower software amortization fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016; and

      lower software amortization from the Skylanders franchise as there was no new release in 2017.

            The decrease was partially offset by higher software amortization associated with the Destiny franchise, primarily due to higher revenuesthe release ofDestiny 2 in 2015. Cost of sales-productSeptember 2017.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The decrease in product costs decreasedfor 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to to:

      lower product costs associated with the Skylanders franchise; and

      the relative increase in revenues coming from the digital online channel, which hastypically have relatively lower product costs, along with decreasedcosts.

            The decrease in software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses related to product costssales for 2016, as a result of the decreased revenues from our relatively lower-margin Distribution business. Cost of sales-software royalties and amortization increasedcompared to 2015, was primarily due to higherlower software amortization from the Destiny franchise, and from software costs associated with new Blizzard product releases.

            Total costasDestiny was released in the third quarter of sales of $1,525 million decreased2014, but had no comparable full-game release in 2014, as compared to total cost of sales of $1,531 million in 2013, primarily due to lower revenues in 2014 and the relative increase in revenues coming from the digital online channel, which has relatively lower product costs, as compared to retail revenues. Cost of sales—product costs decreased primarily due to lower retail product sales, partially offset by increased product costs as a result of increased revenues from our relatively lower-margin Distribution business. Cost of sales—online increased primarily due to higher online revenues and related support costs. Cost of sales—software royalties and amortization increased primarily due to higher software amortization for introduction of new franchises and new product releases during the year. Cost of sales—intellectual property licenses decreased primarily due to the write-down of2015.


    Table of Contents

            This decrease was partially offset by:

      software amortization fromOverwatch, which was released in May 2016 with no comparable 2015 title; and

      higher software amortization associated withCall of Duty: Black Ops III, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2015, as compared toCall of Duty: Advanced Warfare, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Cost of Revenues—Subscription, Licensing, and Other Revenues:

      2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in game operations and distribution costs for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to platform provider fees associated with the increase in revenues from King.

            Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses related to subscription, licensing, and other revenues for 2017 were comparable to 2016.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in 2013,game operations and distribution costs for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      increased online costs and platform provider fees associated with no comparable write-downsrevenues from King titles included following the King Closing Date; and

      increased expenditures to support our growing online activity across our existing and new titles.

            The increase in 2014, lowersoftware royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses related to subscription, licensing, and other revenues for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to a full year-to-date period amortization of ourinternally-developed franchise intangible assets and a reductionacquired in the numberKing Acquisition, while the comparable prior period only included the partial period of titles released by our value business in 2014, which are normally based on licensed properties.amortization of internally-developed franchise intangible assets following the King Closing Date.

    Product Development (amounts in millions)

     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Product development

     $646  14%$571  13%$584  13%$75 $(13)
     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    Product development

     $1,069  15%$958  14%$646  14%$111 $312 

      2017 vs 2016

            For 2015,The increase in product development costs increased,for 2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to increased costs to support our future title releases and increasedto:

      higher Blizzard product development costs primarily associated with higher payrollresulting from lower capitalization of software development costs and bonusesdue to studio personnel.

              For 2014,the timing of game development cycles; and

      increased product development costs decreased,for King, as 2017 includes King's costs for a full year, while 2016 only included King's costs for the partial period following the King Closing Date.

      2016 vs 2015

            The increase in product development costs for 2016, as compared to 2013,2015, was primarily due to lower stock-based compensation expensesto:

      product development costs associated with employees involved inKing's titles for the period following the King Closing Date; and

    Table of Contents

      increased product development as a result of fewer shares grantedcosts for Activision and fewer sharesBlizzard's current and options vested during the year.

      upcoming releases.

    Sales and Marketing (amounts in millions)

     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Sales and marketing

     $734  16%$712  16%$606  13%$22 $106 
     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    Sales and marketing

     $1,378  20%$1,210  18%$734  16%$168 $476 

              Sales2017 vs. 2016

            The increase in sales and marketing expenses increased in 2015,for 2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to increased spending onto:

            The increase was partially offset by lower media spending onsales and marketing costs for the World of Warcraft, Destiny, and Diablo franchises due to the timing ofSkylanders franchise as there was no new title releases.release in 2017.

            Sales        The increase in sales and marketing expenses increased in 2014,for 2016, as compared to 2013,2015, was primarily due to increased spending on to:

            The increase was partially offset by lower media spendingsales and marketing expenditures onGuitar Hero Live and the CallDestiny franchise given the timing of Duty and Skylanders franchises.game launches.

    General and Administrative (amounts in millions)

     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    General and administrative

     $380  8%$417  9%$490  11%$(37)$(73)
     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    General and administrative

     $760  11%$634  10%$380  8%$126 $254 

            GeneralThe increase in general and administrative expenses decreased in 2015,for 2017, as compared to 2014,2016, was primarily due to:


    Table of Contents

      restructuring charges, primarily severance costs, incurred in 2017 with no comparable activity in 2016; and

      higher foreign currency transaction losses.

            The increase is partially offset by lower transaction costs as 2016 included the King Acquisition.

      2016 vs. 2015

            The increase in general and administrative expenses for 2016, as compared to 2015, was primarily due to:

      King's general and administrative costs, which are included from the King Closing Date;

      higher Blizzard personnel costs due to segment performance bonuses and increased headcount to support the growth of the Blizzard business;

      higher professional and transaction-related fees due to the King Acquisition, which closed on February 23, 2016; and

      lower foreign currency transaction and derivative contract gains.

    Interest and Other Expense (Income), Net (amounts in millions)

     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Interest and other expense, net

     $198  4%$202  5%$53  1%$(4)$149 
     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    consolidated
    net revenues
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    Interest and other expense (income), net

     $146  2%$214  3%$198  4%$(68)$16 

      2017 vs. 2016

            InterestThe decrease in interest and other expense, net, for 2017, as compared to 2016, was primarily due to our lower total outstanding debt and lower interest rates on our current debt instruments as a result of our refinancing activities in 2016 and 2017. See further discussion below under "Liquidity and Capital Resources."

      2016 vs. 2015 was comparable to 2014.

            InterestThe increase in interest and other expense, net, was $202 million in 2014,for 2016, as compared to $53 million in 2013, reflecting a full year of2015, was primarily due to interest expense associated with the new $2.3 billion tranche of term loans "A" that were incurred fromin connection with the NotesKing Acquisition. This increase was partially offset by lower interest expense related to our prior term loan because of voluntary prepayments on the principal we made throughout 2016, with the prior term loan being fully extinguished in September 2016. See further discussion below under "Liquidity and the Term Loan, which were issued and drawn, respectively, in October 2013. Interest expense for 2013 reflects interest from the period in which the Notes and the Term Loan were issued and drawn, respectively, to the end of the year.Capital Resources."

    Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (amounts in millions)

     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    Pretax
    income
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2014
     % of
    Pretax
    income
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2013
     % of
    Pretax
    income
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
     

    Income tax expense

     $229  20%$146  15%$309  23%$83 $(163)
     
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2017
     % of
    Pretax
    income
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2016
     % of
    Pretax
    income
     Year Ended
    December 31,
    2015
     % of
    Pretax
    income
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    Income tax expense

     $878  76%$140  13%$229  20%$738 $(89)

            For the yearyears ended December 2015, 201431, 2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, the Company's income before income tax expense was $1,121 million, $981 million,$1.15 billion, $1.11 billion, and $1,319 million,$1.12 billion, respectively, and our income tax expense was $878 million (or a 76% effective tax rate), $140 million (or a 13% effective tax rate), and $229 million (or a 20% effective tax rate), $146 million (or a 15% effective tax rate), and $309 million (or a 23% effective tax rate), respectively. Overall, ourOur full year 2017 effective tax rate differs from of 76% is higher than


    Table of Contents

    the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, primarily due to the one-time tax expense related to the U.S. Tax Reform Act (discussed further below) and changes in the Company's liability for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by earnings taxed at relatively lower rates in foreign jurisdictions, recognition of the Californiaexcess tax benefits from shared-based payments, and research and development ("R&D") credits,credits.

            On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Tax Reform Act was enacted. The U.S. Tax Reform Act, among other things, reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018 and recognitionimplemented a modified territorial tax system that imposes a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries ("Transition Tax").

            On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on how to account for the effects of the retroactive reinstatementU.S. Tax Reform Act under ASC 740. SAB 118 enables companies to record a provisional amount for the effects of the federal R&D tax credit, partially offset by changesU.S. Tax Reform Act based on a reasonable estimate, subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year, until accounting is complete.

            We recorded a provisional amount for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act based on a reasonable estimate in the Company's liabilityfourth quarter of 2017 resulting in a charge of $636 million. This includes current tax expense of $555 million related to the Transition Tax, which is payable over eight years, and deferred tax expense of $81 million related to the remeasurement of deferred taxes resulting from the U.S. corporate income tax rate reduction. Accounting for uncertainthe income tax positions.effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act requires complex new calculations to be performed and significant judgments in interpreting the legislation. Additional guidance may be issued on how the provisions of the U.S. Tax Reform Act will be applied or otherwise administered that is different from our interpretation. We may make adjustments to the provisional amounts as we collect and prepare the data necessary to finalize our calculations, interpret the U.S. Tax Reform Act and any additional guidance issued, and consider the effects of any additional actions we may take as a result of the U.S. Tax Reform Act.

            We continue to analyze the prospective effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, including new provisions impacting certain foreign income, such as global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") of foreign subsidiaries, base erosion anti-abuse tax ("BEAT"), and foreign-derived intangible income ("FDII"), potential limitations on interest expense deductions, and changes to the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, among other provisions of the U.S. Tax Reform Act.

            In 20152017 and 2014,2016, our U.S. income before income tax expense was $355$185 million and $325$228 million, respectively, and comprised 32%16% and 33%21%, respectively, of our consolidated income before income tax expense. In 20152017 and 2014, the2016, our foreign income before income tax expense was $766$966 million and $656$878 million, respectively, and comprised 68%84% and 67%79%, respectively, of our consolidated income before income tax expense.

            In 20152017, 2016 and 2014,2015, earnings taxed at lower rates in foreign jurisdictions, as compared to domestic earnings taxed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, lowered our effective tax rate by 20%24 percentage points, 22 percentage points, and 25%,20 percentage points, respectively. The decrease in the foreign rate differential is due to changes in foreign temporary differences, as compared to the prior-year.

            In 2014 and 2013, earnings taxed at lower rates in foreign jurisdictions, as compared to domestic earnings taxed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, lowered our effective tax rate by 25% and 13%, respectively. The primary increase in the foreign rate differential is due to the proportionaloverall increase over the prior-year's earnings in foreign jurisdictionsincome, which is taxed at relatively lower rates. In addition, the 2014 foreign tax provision resultedrates in a benefit dueproportion to changes in foreign temporary differences, as compared to the prior-year.

            Vivendi Games results for the period January 1, 2008 through July 9, 2008 are included in the consolidated federal and certain foreign state and local income tax returns filed by Vivendi or its affiliates while Vivendi Games results for the period from July 10, 2008 through December 31, 2008 are included in the consolidated federal and certain foreign, state and local income tax returns filed by Activision Blizzard. Vivendi Games tax year 2008 remains open to examination by the major taxing


    Table of Contents

    authorities. In addition, Vivendi Games' tax return for the 2008 tax year is before the appeals function of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and is under examination by several state taxing authorities.

            Activision Blizzard's tax years 2008 through 2014 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The IRS is currently examining the Company's federal tax returns for the 2008 through 2011 tax years. During the second quarter of 2015, the Company transitioned the review of its transfer pricing methodology from the advanced pricing agreement review process to the IRS examination team. Their review could result in a different allocation of profits and losses under the Company's transfer pricing agreements. Such allocation could have a positive or negative impact on our provision for the period in which such a determination is reached and the relevant periods thereafter. The Company also has several state and non-U.S. audits pending.

            The final resolution of the Company's global tax disputes is uncertain. There is significant judgment required in the analysis of disputes, including the probability determination and estimation of the potential exposure. Based on current information, in the opinion of the Company's management, the ultimate resolution of these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, an unfavorable resolution of the Company's global tax disputes could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations in the period in which the matters are ultimately resolved.U.S. income.

            The overall effective income tax rate in future periods will depend on a variety of factors, such as changes in the mix of income by tax jurisdiction, applicable accounting rules, applicable tax laws and regulations, and rulings and interpretations thereof, developments in tax audits and other matters, and variations in the estimated and actual level of annual pre-tax income or loss. Further, the effective tax rate could fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis and could be adversely affected by the extent that income (loss) before income tax expenses (benefit) is lower than anticipated in foreign regions, where taxes are levied at relatively lower statutory rates, and/or higher than anticipated in the United States, where taxes are levied at relatively higher statutory rates.


    Table of Contents

            A more detailedOn December 28, 2017, we received a Notice of Reassessment from the FTA related to transfer pricing concerning intercompany transactions involving one of our French subsidiaries for the 2011 through 2013 tax years. The total assessment, including penalties and interest, was approximately €571 million ($680 million). We disagree with the proposed assessment and intend to vigorously contest it. We plan to pursue all remedies available to us to successfully resolve this matter, including administrative remedies with the FTA, and judicial remedies, if necessary. While we believe our tax provisions at December 31, 2017 are appropriate, until such time as this matter is ultimately resolved we could be subject to significant additional tax liabilities. In addition to the risk of additional tax for years 2011 through 2013, if litigation regarding this matter were adversely determined and/or if the FTA were to seek adjustments of a similar nature for subsequent years, we could be subject to significant additional tax liabilities.

            Further analysis of the differences between the U.S. federal statutory rate and the consolidated effective tax rate, as well as other information about our income taxes, is provided in Note 15 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

    Foreign Exchange Impact

            Changes in foreign exchange rates had a negativepositive impact of $242$27 million, a positive impact of $10 million, and a negative impact of $8 million, and a positive impact of $20$242 million on Activision Blizzard's consolidated operating income in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The change ischanges are primarily due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and British pound and its impact on our foreign operating income.

            For the year ended December 31, 2014, given that the majority of the Company's GAAP net consolidated operating income is generated in the first half of the fiscal year due to the impact of deferrals, where the euro and British pound strengthened against the U.S dollar as compared to the same period in 2013, the negative impact from the significant weakening of the euro and British pound relative to U.S. dollar in the later stages of 2014 was largely offset in on the Company's consolidated operating income for the full year 2014.


    Table of Contents

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

            We believe our ability to generate cash flows from operating activities is one of our fundamental financial strengths. In the near term, we expect our business and financial condition to remain strong and to continue to generate significant operating cash flows, which, in combination with our existing balance of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $4.8 billion, our access to capital, and the availability of our $250 million revolving credit facility, we believe will be sufficient to finance our operational and financing requirements for the next 12 months. Our primary sources of liquidity, which are available to us to fund cash outflows such as our anticipated dividend payments, share repurchases, and scheduled debt maturities, include our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash flows provided by operating activities.

            As of December 31, 2017, the amount of cash and cash equivalents held outside of the U.S. by our foreign subsidiaries was $3.0 billion, as compared to $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2016. Following the enactment of the U.S. Tax Reform Act and the current period expense on unrepatriated earnings, we no longer consider these available cash balances, which primarily relate to undistributed earnings of our most significant foreign subsidiaries, to be indefinitely reinvested.

            Our cash provided from operating activities is somewhat impacted by seasonality. Working capital needs are impacted by weekly sales, which are generally highest in the fourth quarter due to seasonal and holiday-related sales patterns. On a continuing basis, we consider various transactions to increase shareholder value and enhance our business results, including acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, share repurchases, and other structural changes. These transactions may result in future cash proceeds or payments.


    Table of Contents

    Sources of Liquidity (amounts in millions)


     For the Years Ended
    December 31,
      For the Years Ended
    December 31,
     

     2015 2014 Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
      2017 2016 Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     

    Cash and cash equivalents

     $1,823 $4,848 $(3,025) $4,713 $3,245 $1,468 

    Short-term investments

     8 10 (2) 62 13 49 

     $1,831 $4,858 $(3,027) $4,775 $3,258 $1,517 

    Percentage of total assets

     12% 33%    26% 19%   

     


     For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 

     2015 2014 2013 Increase
    (Decrease)
    2015 v 2014
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2014 v 2013
      2017 2016 2015 Increase
    (Decrease)
    2017 v 2016
     Increase
    (Decrease)
    2016 v 2015
     

    Cash flows provided by operating activities

     $1,192 $1,292 $1,264 $(100)$28 

    Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

     (3,716) (84) 308 (3,632) (392)

    Cash flows used in financing activities

     (135) (374) (1,223) 239 849 

    Net cash provided by operating activities

     $2,213 $2,155 $1,259 $58 $896 

    Net cash used in investing activities

     (197) (1,177) (3,716) 980 2,539 

    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (624) 500 (202) (1,124) 702 

    Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

     (366) (396) 102 30 (498) 76 (56) (366) 132 310 
    ���

    Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     $(3,025)$438 $451 $(3,463)$(13)

    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     $1,468 $1,422 $(3,025)$46 $4,447 

    Net Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

            The primary driversdriver of net cash flows provided byassociated with our operating activities typically includeis the collection of customer receivables generated byfrom the sale of our products and digital and subscription revenues,services. These collections are typically partially offset byby: payments to vendors for the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of our products,products; payments for customer service support for our players,consumers; payments to third-party developers and intellectual property holders,holders; payments for interest on our debt,debt; payments for software development,development; payments for tax liabilities,liabilities; and payments to our workforce.

      2017 vs 2016

            Cash flowsNet cash provided by operating activities were lower for 2015,2017 was $2.21 billion, as compared to 2014,$2.16 billion for 2016. The increase was primarily due to:

      increased earnings after excluding the effects of charges due to impacts from the U.S. Tax Reform Act, which did not result in current year cash outflows, and other non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation expenses;

      a full year of King operating cash flows; and

      changes in our working capital due to the timing of collections and payments.

            Net cash provided by operating assets and liabilities, drivenactivities for 2017 included $145 million of interest paid on our outstanding debt, as compared to $209 million paid in 2016.

      2016 vs 2015

            Net cash provided by the prior-yearoperating activities for 2016 was $2.2 billion, as compared to $1.3 billion for 2015. The increase was primarily due to:

      new operating cash flows benefiting from a substantial increase in revenues which were deferred. These are partially offsetcontributed by a King following the King Closing Date; and

    Table of Contents

      higher net income in 20152016, as compared to 2014 and2015, along with larger adjustments to net income for non-cash charges, includingprimarily associated with the amortization of capitalized software development costs.

      the acquired intangibles in the King Acquisition, higher stock compensation expense due to converted equity awards for King personnel in the King Acquisition, and other non-cash or non-operating costs associated with our debt-related activities during the year.

            Cash flowsNet cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20152016 included approximately $193$209 million of interest paid for the Notes and Term Loan,on our outstanding debt, as compared to $201$193 million paid in 2014.

            Cash flows provided by operating activities were slightly higher for 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily due to a more favorable impact from changes in our working capital accounts, mainly related to cash flows from revenues which were deferred.2015.

    Net Cash Flows (Used in) Provided byUsed in Investing Activities

            The primary drivers of net cash flows (used in) provided byassociated with investing activities typically include the net effect ofcapital expenditures, purchases and sales/maturitiessales of short-term investments, capital expenditures, and changes in restricted cash balances.balances, and cash used for acquisitions.


            Cash flowsNet cash used in investing activities were $3.7 billion in 2015,for 2017 was $197 million, as compared to $1.2 billion for 2016. The decrease in the cash flowsused was primarily due to cash used for the King Acquisition in 2016, with no comparable transaction in 2017. The decrease was partially offset by purchases of available-for-sale investments, net of proceeds from maturities, of $55 million in 2017, with no comparable transaction in 2016.

      2016 vs 2015

            Net cash used in investing activities for 2016 was $1.2 billion, as compared to $3.7 billion for 2015. The lower amount of $84 million in 2014. Increased cash flows used in investing activities werein 2016 was primarily due to a 2015 cash outflow of $3.6 billion for cash depositedplaced into escrow to facilitate the King Acquisition. In 2016, when we acquired King, the cash in escrow became a cash inflow. As a result, in 2016 we had a $2.2 billion cash outflow for the King Acquisition andin excess of the cash used to acquire Major League Gamingalready in the fourth quarterescrow, net of 2015.

            Cash flows used in investing activities were $84 million in 2014, as compared to$1.15 billion of cash flows provided by investing activities of $308 million in 2013. Lower cash flowsacquired from investing activities were primarily due to lower proceeds from the maturity of investments and a higher investment in capital expenditures. In 2014, proceeds from maturities were $21 million, the majority of which consisted of U.S. treasury and other government agency securities. Further, capital expenditures during 2014, primarily related to property and equipment, were $107 million.King.

    Net Cash Flows Used inProvided by (Used in) Financing Activities

            The primary drivers of net cash flows used inassociated with financing activities typically include the proceeds from, and repayments of, our long-term debt and transactions involving our common stock, such asincluding the issuance of shares of common stock to employees upon the repurchaseexercise of our common stock andoptions, as well as the payment of dividends.

      2017 vs 2016

            CashNet cash used in financing activities for 2017 was $624 million, as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $500 million for 2016. The changes were primarily attributed to our debt financing activities. For 2017, we had net debt repayments of $500 million, as compared to approximately $700 million of net debt proceeds, inclusive of a premium payment, for 2016. The cash flows used in financing activities for 2017, were partially offset by:

      higher proceeds from stock option exercises in 2017 of $178 million, as compared to $106 million for 2016; and

      lower tax payments made for net share settlements on restricted stock units in 2017 of $56 million, as compared to $115 million in 2016.

    Table of Contents

      2016 vs 2015

            Net cash provided by financing activities for 2016 was $500 million, as compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $135$202 million for 2015. The difference was primarily due to $6.9 billion of proceeds received from the following debt issuances in 2016:

      issuance of a $2.3 billion tranche of term loans "A" on February 23, 2016 to fund the King Acquisition;

      issuance of an additional $250 million tranche of term loans "A" on March 31, 2016;

      issuance of a new unsecured $2.9 billion tranche of term loans "A" in connection with the fifth amendment to our credit agreement on August 23, 2016;

      issuance of $650 million of 2.3% unsecured senior notes due September 2021 on September 19, 2016; and

      issuance of $850 million of 3.4% unsecured senior notes due September 2026 on September 19, 2016.

            These issuances were lowerpartially offset by:

      repayments of $1.9 billion to extinguish our term loan outstanding at December 31, 2015 (the "Original Term Loan");

      repayments of $2.5 billion in 2015,connection with the refinancing of our tranche of term loans "A" that were provided in the first quarter of 2016;

      repayments of $185 million on our new tranche of term loans "A" that were provided on August 23, 2016, which included $167 million of voluntary prepayments, as compared to $374the $250 million partial repayment of our Original Term Loan in 2015;

      a cash payment to redeem all $1.5 billion of our outstanding 5.625% unsecured senior notes due September 2021, as well as the associated $63 million premium; and

      higher cash dividend payments made during 2016, as compared to 2015.

            Net cash used in 2014, primarily due tofinancing activities for 2015 also included proceeds of $202 million of proceeds received in the settlement of the litigation related to the Purchase Transaction, and the lower partial repaymentOctober 11, 2013 repurchase of our Term Loan in 2015 of $250approximately 429 million as compared to the $375 million partial repayment of our Term Loan in 2014. These were partially offset by lower proceeds from stock options exercised by our employees and the higher cash dividend payment made during 2015, as compared to 2014.

            Cash flows used in financing activities of $374 million were lower in 2014, as compared to $1,223 million used in 2013, primarily due to the lack of share repurchases in 2014, offset by the $375 million partial repayment of our Term Loan. We also paid $147 million in dividends and related dividend equivalents and $66 million for taxes in connection with the vesting of employees' restricted stock rights. Cash flows from financing activities for 2014 reflected proceeds of $175 million from the issuance of shares of our common stock to employees(the "Purchase Transaction"). There were no such proceeds received in connection with stock option exercises.2016.

    Effect of Foreign Exchange Rate Changes

            Changes in foreign exchange rates had a negativepositive impact of $366$76 million, a negative impact of $396$56 million, and a positivenegative impact of $102$366 million on our cash and cash equivalents for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively. The change is primarily due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euroEuro and British pound.

    Other Liquidity and Capital ResourcesDebt

            Our primary sourcesAs of liquidity are typically cash and cash equivalents, investments, and cash flows provided by operating activities. In addition, asDecember 31, 2016, our total outstanding debt was $4.9 billion, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 2.92%. As a result of the activities described below, we have availabilityour total outstanding debt as of $250 million, subject to certain restrictions, under a secured revolving credit facility. With our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1.8 billion at December 31, 2015,2017, was $4.4 billion, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 3.58%.

            On February 3, 2017, we entered into a sixth amendment (the "Sixth Amendment") to our credit agreement, which was originally executed on October 11, 2013 (as amended thereafter and expected cash flowsfrom time to time, the "Credit Agreement"). The Sixth Amendment: (1) provided by operating activities, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet daily operationsfor a new tranche of term loans "A" in the foreseeable future. We also believe that we have sufficient working capitalan aggregate principal amount of $0.8$2.55 billion at December 31, 2015, to finance our operational(the "2017 TLA") and financing requirements for at least the next twelve months, including: purchases(2) released each of inventory and equipment; the development, production, marketing and sale of new products; provision of customer service for our players; acquisition of intellectual property rights for future products from third parties; funding of dividends; and payments related to debt obligations.


    Table of Contents

            As of December 31, 2015,our subsidiary guarantors from their respective guarantees provided under the amount of cash and cash equivalents held outsideCredit Agreement. All proceeds of the U.S. by our foreign subsidiaries was $0.5 billion, as compared2017 TLA, together with additional cash on hand of $139 million, were used to $3.6 billion as of December 31, 2014. The decrease is due tofully retire the requirementsterm loans then outstanding (the "2016 TLA") under the TransactionCredit Agreement, for the King Acquisition, which required us to deposit $3.6 billion in cash to be held in an escrow account until the earlier of (i) the completionincluding all accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The terms of the King Acquisition, or (ii)2017 TLA, other than the terminationabsence of the Transaction Agreement. The cash was not accessible tosubsidiary guarantees, are generally the Company for operating cash needssame as its use was administratively restricted for use in the consummationterms of the King Acquisition. At December 31, 2015, we recorded the balance2016 TLA. The fees incurred as a result of the escrow account as a non-current asset, "Cash in escrow," in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            If the cash and cash equivalents held outside of the U.S. is needed in the future for our operations in the U.S., we would accrue and pay the required U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and our current plans doSixth Amendment were not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations.

    Debtmaterial. The 2017 TLA will mature on August 23, 2021.

            On September 19, 2013,May 26, 2017, in a public underwritten offering, we issued at par, $1.5 billionthree series of 5.625%unsecured senior notes—$400 million of 2.6% unsecured senior notes due September 2021 (the "2021 Notes") and $750June 2022, $400 million of 6.125%3.4% unsecured senior notes due September 2023 (the "2023 Notes"June 2027, and $400 million of 4.5% unsecured senior notes due June 2047. The proceeds from these unsecured senior notes, together with cash on hand, were used to make a prepayment of $1.2 billion on our 2017 TLA.

            During the 2021 Notes,year ended December 31, 2017, we reduced our total outstanding long-term debt by $500 million. This included $139 million of cash used to retire the "Notes"). Interest2016 TLA, as discussed above, along with a prepayment on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 152017 TLA of each year, commencing on March 15, 2014. As of December 31, 2015, the Notes had a carrying value of $2.2 billion.

            We may redeem the 2021 Notes on or after September 15, 2016 and the 2023 Notes on or after September 15, 2018, in whole or in part on any one or more occasions, at specified redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest. At any time prior to September 15, 2016, with respect to the 2021 Notes, and at any time prior to September 15, 2018, with respect to the 2023 Notes, we may also redeem some or all of the Notes by paying a "make-whole premium", plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, upon the occurrence of one or more qualified equity offerings, we may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the 2021 Notes and 2023 Notes outstanding with the net cash proceeds from such offerings.$361 million. The Notes are repayable, in whole or in part and at the option of the holders, upon the occurrence of a change in control and a ratings downgrade, at a purchase price equal to 101% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

            On October 11, 2013, in connection and simultaneously with the Purchase Transaction, we entered into a credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") for a $2.5 billion secured term loan facility maturing in October 2020 (the "Term Loan"), and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver" and, together with the Term Loan, the "Credit Facilities"). A portion of the Revolver can be used to issue letters of credit of up to $50 million, subject to the availability of the Revolver. To date, we have not drawn on the Revolver.

            As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding balance of our Term Loan was $1.9 billion. Borrowings under the Term Loan and Revolver bear interest at an annual rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at our option, (A) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the interest rate in effect determined by the administrative agent as its "prime rate," (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (c) the London InterBank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, or (B) LIBOR. Further, LIBOR borrowings under the Term Loan will be subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.75%. At December 31, 2015, the Term Loan bore interest at 3.25%. In certain circumstances, our interest rate under the Credit Facilities will increase.

            In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal balances under the Credit Facilities, we are required to pay the lenders a commitment fee on unused commitments under the Revolver. We are also required to pay customary letter of credit fees and agency fees.


    Table of Contents

            The Credit Agreement required quarterly principal repayments of 0.25% of the Term Loan's original principal amount, with the balance due on the maturity date. On February 11, 2014, weprepayment made a voluntary principal repayment of $375 million on our Term Loan. This repayment2017 TLA satisfied the remaining required quarterly principal repayments for the entire term of the Credit Agreement.

            A summary of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2017, is as follows (amounts in millions):

     
     December 31, 2017 
     
     Gross
    Carrying
    Amount
     Unamortized
    Discount and Deferred
    Financing Costs
     Net
    Carrying
    Amount
     

    2017 TLA

     $990 $(8)$982 

    2021 Notes

      650  (4) 646 

    2022 Notes

      400  (4) 396 

    2023 Notes

      750  (9) 741 

    2026 Notes

      850  (9) 841 

    2027 Notes

      400  (6) 394 

    2047 Notes

      400  (10) 390 

    Total debt

     $4,440 $(50)$4,390 

            A summary of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2016, is as follows (amounts in millions):

     
     December 31, 2016 
     
     Gross
    Carrying
    Amount
     Unamortized
    Discount and Deferred
    Financing Costs
     Net
    Carrying
    Amount
     

    2016 TLA

     $2,690 $(27)$2,663 

    2021 Notes

      650  (5) 645 

    2023 Notes

      750  (11) 739 

    2026 Notes

      850  (10) 840 

    Total long-term debt

     $4,940 $(53)$4,887 

            On February 11, 2015,1, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized repayments of up to $1.8 billion of the company's outstanding debt during 2018. As of the date hereof, we have not made anany additional voluntary principalrepayments on our outstanding debt and the determination as to if and when we make any such repayment this time in the amount of $250 million, which reduced the balance due on the maturity date. The 2015 repayment reduced the Term Loan's outstanding principal balance to $1.9 billion and based on this reduced balance, we expect our contractual interest payments in the future will be reduced by approximately $8 million annually, baseddependent on the interest rate of 3.25% at December 31, 2015. Amounts borrowed under the Term Loanmarket conditions and repaid may not be re-borrowed.other factors.

            Agreements governing our indebtedness, including the indenture governing the Notes and the Credit Agreement, impose operating and financial restrictions on our activities under certain conditions. These restrictions require usRefer to comply with or maintain certain financial tests and ratios. In addition, the indenture and the Credit Agreement limit or prohibit our ability to, among other things: incur additional debt or make additional guarantees; pay distributions or dividends and repurchase stock; make other restricted payments, including without limitation, certain restricted investments; create liens; enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries; engage in transactions with affiliates; and enter into mergers, consolidations or sales of substantially all of our assets.

            In addition, if, in the future, we borrow under the Revolver, as described in Note 11 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K we may be required, during certain periods where outstanding revolving loans exceed a certain threshold, to maintain a maximum senior secured net leverage ratio calculated pursuant to a financial maintenance covenant under the Credit Agreement.

            The Company was in compliancefor disclosures regarding terms and activities associated with the terms of the Notes and Credit Facilities as of December 31, 2015.

    Amendments to Credit Agreement

            Tranche A Term Loan    In conjunction with the King Acquisition, the Company entered into three Amendments to the Credit Agreement (the "Amendments"). The Amendments, among other things, provide for incremental term loans in the form of Tranche A Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.3 billion, the proceeds of which were to be issued upon successful closing to fund the King Acquisition.

            On February 23, 2016, we successfully completed the King Acquisition and the Tranche A Term Loans funded. The Tranche A Term Loans are scheduled to mature on October 11, 2020 and bear interest, at the Company's option, at either (a) a base rate equal to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate, plus 0.5%, (ii) the prime commercial lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. and (iii) the LIBOR for an interest period of one month beginning on such day plus 1.00%, or (b) LIBOR, in each case, plus an applicable interest margin. LIBOR is subject to a floor of 0% and the base rate is subject to an effective floor of 1.00%. The applicable interest margin for Tranche A Term Loans ranges from 1.50% to 2.25% for LIBOR borrowings and from 0.50% to 1.25% for base rate borrowings and is determined by reference to a pricing grid based on the Company's Consolidated Total Net Debt Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement).

            The Amendments require quarterly principal payments of 0.625% of the stated principal amount of the Tranche A Term Loans, with increases to 1.250% starting on June 30, 2019 and 3.125% starting on June 30, 2020, with the remaining balance payable on the Tranche A Term Loans' scheduled maturity date of October 11, 2020. Voluntary prepayments of the Tranche A Term Loans are permitted at any time, in minimum principal amounts, without premium or penalty.our debt obligations.


    Table of Contents

            The Tranche A Term Loans are subject to a financial maintenance covenant requiring the Company to maintain a maximum Consolidated Total Net Debt Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 4.00 to 1.00, which will decrease to 3.50 to 1.00 (I) after the sixth full fiscal quarter after the Tranche A Term Loans are made or (II) if the Collateral Suspension occurs prior to the date falling 18 months after the Tranche A Term Loans are made, on the later of (x) the last day of the fourth full fiscal quarter after the Tranche A Term Loans are made and (y) the last day of the fiscal quarter in which the Collateral Suspension occurs.

            The Tranche A Term Loans are secured by the same collateral and guaranteed by the same guarantors that secure and guarantee the existing Term Loans. The other terms of the Tranche A Term Loans are also generally the same as the terms of the existing Term Loan.

            Revolving Credit FacilityDividends    As part of the Amendments, upon the closing of the King Acquisition, the Company's existing revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement (as in effect prior to the closing of the King Acquisition) in an aggregate principal amount of $250 million was replaced with a new revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement in the same aggregate principal amount (the "2015 Revolving Credit Facility").

            Borrowings under the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed by the Company and are available for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Up to $50 million of the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility may be used for letters of credit.

            The 2015 Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on October 11, 2020. Borrowings under the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company's option, under the same terms as the Tranche A Term Loans. Additionally, the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility is subject to the same financial maintenance covenant and is secured by the same collateral and guaranteed by the same guarantors that secure and guarantee the Tranche A Term Loans. The other terms of the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility are generally the same as the terms of the Revolver.

    Debt Repayments

            On February 2, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized repayments of up to $1.5 billion of our outstanding debt during 2016. On February 25, 2016, we made a voluntary principal repayment of $500 million on our Term Loan, reducing the aggregate term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement, which includes the $2.3 billion of Tranche A Term Loans, to $3.7 billion.

    Dividends

            On February 2, 2016,1, 2018, our Board of Directors declaredapproved a cash dividend of $0.26$0.34 per common share, payable on May 11, 2016,9, 2018, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2016.2018.

            On February 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.30 per common share and we made an aggregate cash dividend payment on May 10, 2017 of $226 million to shareholders.

    Capital Expenditures

            We made capital expenditures of $111$155 million in 2015,2017, as compared to $107$136 million in 2014.2016. In 2016,2018, we anticipate total capital expenditures of approximately $155 million. Capital expenditures are expected to bemillion, primarily for leasehold improvements, computer hardware, and software purchases.

    Commitments

            In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements with third parties for non-cancelable operating lease agreements for our offices, for the development of products, and for rights to intellectual property. Under these agreements, we commit to provide specified payments to a lessor, developer or intellectual property holder, as the case may be, based upon contractual arrangements. The payments to third-party developers are generally conditioned upon the achievement by the developers of contractually specified development milestones. Further, these payments to third-


    Table of Contents

    party developers and intellectual property holders typically are deemed to be advances and are recoupable against future royalties earned by the developer or intellectual property holder based on the sale of the related game. Additionally, in connection with certain intellectual property rights acquisitions and development agreements, we commit to spend specified amounts for marketing support for the related game(s) which is to be developed or in which the intellectual property will be utilized. Assuming all contractual provisions are met, the total future minimum commitments for these and other contractual arrangements in place at December 31, 2015 are scheduled to be paid as follows (amounts in millions):

     
     Contractual Obligations(1) 
     
     Facility and
    equipment leases
     Developer
    and IP
     Marketing Long-term debt
    obligations(2)
     Total 

    For the Year Ending December 31,

                    

    2016

     $35 $190 $28 $192 $445 

    2017

      32  5  53  192  282 

    2018

      30    15  192  237 

    2019

      27      192  219 

    2020

      19      2,045  2,064 

    Thereafter

      35  2    2,472  2,509 

    Total

     $178 $197 $96 $5,285 $5,756 

    (1)
    We have omitted uncertain income tax liabilities from this table due to the inherent uncertainty regarding the timing of potential issue resolution. Specifically, either the underlying positions have not been fully developed enough under audit to quantify at this time or the years relating to the issues for certain jurisdictions are not currently under audit. At December 31, 2015, we had $471 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $453 million was included in "Other liabilities" and $18 million was included in "Accrued expenses and other liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheet.

    (2)
    Long-term debt obligations represent our obligations related to the contractual principal repayments and interest payments under the Term Loan and the Notes as of December 31, 2015. There was no outstanding balance under our Revolver as of December 31, 2015. The Notes are subject to fixed interest rates and we have calculated the interest obligation based on the applicable rates and payment dates for the Notes. The Term Loan bears a variable interest rate and interest is payable on a quarterly basis. We have calculated the expected interest obligation based on the outstanding principal balance and interest rate applicable at December 31, 2015.        Refer to Note 1119 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information ondisclosures regarding our debt obligations. On February 11, 2015, we made a voluntary partial repayment of $250 million to the Term Loan. The 2015 repayment reduced our contractual interest payments, as shown in the table above, by approximately $8 million annually, through the October 2020 maturity date, based on the interest rate of 3.25% at December 31, 2015. On February 25, 2016, we made a voluntary principal repayment of $500 million on our Term Loan.
    commitments.

    Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

            At December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, Activision Blizzard had no significant relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial parties, often referred to as "structured finance" or "special purpose" entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes, that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future


    Table of Contents

    effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operation,operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

    Financial Disclosure

            We maintain internal control over financial reporting, which generally includes those controls relating to the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). We also are focused on our "disclosure controls and procedures," which as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), are generally those controls and procedures designed to ensure that financial and non-financial information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with the SEC is reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is communicated to management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

            Our Disclosure Committee, which operates under the Board of Directors approved Disclosure Committee Charter and Disclosure Controls & Procedures Policy, includes senior management representatives and assists executive management in its oversight of the accuracy and timeliness of our disclosures, as well as in implementing and evaluating our overall disclosure process. As part of our disclosure process, senior finance and operational representatives from all of our corporate divisions and business units prepare quarterly reports regarding their current-quarter operational performance, future trends, subsequent events, internal controls, changes in internal controls and other accounting and disclosure relevant information. These quarterly reports are reviewed by certain key corporate finance executives. These corporate finance representatives also conduct quarterly interviews on a rotating basis with the preparers of selected quarterly reports. The results of the quarterly reports and related interviews are reviewed by the Disclosure Committee. Finance representatives also conduct interviews with our senior management team, our legal counsel and other appropriate personnel involved in the disclosure process, as appropriate. Additionally, senior finance and operational representatives provide internal certifications regarding the accuracy of information they provide that is utilized in the preparation of our periodic public reports filed with the SEC. Financial results and other financial information also are reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. As required by applicable regulatory requirements, the principal executive and financial officers review and make various certifications regarding the accuracy of our periodic public reports filed with the SEC, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting. With the assistance of the Disclosure Committee, we will continue to assess and monitor, and make refinements to, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting.

    Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

            The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations are discussed throughout Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. The policies, estimates, and assumptions discussed below are considered by management to be critical because they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and because their application places the most significant demands on management's judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimates and assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies, estimates, and assumptions are described in the following paragraphs.


    Table of Contents

    Revenue Recognition including Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables

            We recognize revenues when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product or service has been provided to the customer, the collection of our fees is reasonably assured, and the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable. Certain products are sold to customers with a "street date" (which is the earliest date these products may be sold by retailers). For these products, we recognize revenues on the later of the street date or the date the product is sold to the customer.


    Table of Contents

      Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables

       ��    Certain of our revenue arrangements have multiple deliverables, which we account for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 605 and Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-13.605. These revenue arrangements include product sales consisting of both software, service (such as ongoing hosting arrangements), and hardware deliverables (such as peripherals or other ancillary collectors' items sold together with physical "boxed" software) and our sales ofWorld of Warcraft boxed products, expansion packs and value-added services, each of which is considered with the related subscription services for these purposes..

            Under ASC Topic 605 and ASU 2009-13, whenWhen a revenue arrangement contains multiple elements, such as hardware and software products, licenses and/or services, we allocate revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor-specific-objective-evidencevendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") if it is available, third-party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available, or best estimated selling price ("BESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In multiple element arrangements where more-than-incidental software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. IfFurther, if the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable, the arrangement consideration allocated to the software deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue.

            As noted above, when neither VSOE nor TPE is available for a deliverable, we use BESP. We did not have significant revenue arrangements that requirerequired using BESP for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016, and 2013.2015. The inputs we use to determine the selling price of our significant deliverables include the actual price charged by the Company for a deliverabledeliverables that the Company sells separately which(which represents the VSOE,VSOE) and the wholesale prices of the same or similar products whichfor deliverables not sold separately (which represents TPE.TPE).

      Product Sales

            For productProduct sales which include the saleconsists of sales of our games, including physical products and digital full-game downloads, we considerdownloads. We recognize revenues from the product or service to have been provided to the customer upon the transfersale of our products after both (1) title and risk of loss have been transferred to our customers for physical products, orand (2) all performance obligations have been completed. With respect to digital full-game downloads, this is when the product is available for download or is activated for gameplay, for digital full-game downloads.gameplay. Revenues from product sales are recognized after deducting the estimated allowance for returns and price protection.

      Product with Online Functionality or Online Hosted Arrangements

            For our software products with online functionality or that are a part of aan online hosted service arrangement, we evaluate whether that online functionality constitutes a more-than-inconsequential separate deliverable in addition to the software product. This evaluation is performed for each software product or product add-on (including digital downloadable content), when it is released. Determining whether the online functionality for a particular gameproduct constitutes a more-than-inconsequential deliverable is subjective and requires management's judgment. When we determine that the online functionality constitutes a more-than-inconsequential separate service deliverable in addition to the product, which is principally because of the online functionality's importance to gameplay, we consider our performance obligation for this title to extend beyond the sale of the game. In addition, VSOE of fair value does not exist for the online functionality of some products, as we do not separately charge for this component of every title.component. As a result, we initially defer all of the software-related revenues from the sale of any such title (including digital downloadable content) and recognize the revenues ratably over the estimated service period of the title.period. In addition, we initially defer the costscost of salesrevenues for the title and recognize the costscost of revenues as the related revenues are recognized. The cost of revenues that are initially deferred include


    Table of Contents

    of sales as the related revenues are recognized. The costs of sales include manufacturingproduct and distribution costs, software royalties and amortization, and intellectual property licenses and excludesexclude intangible asset amortization.

            For our software products with online functionality that are considered to be incidental to the overall product offering and are inconsequential deliverables, we recognize the related revenues when the revenue recognition criteria described above have been met.

            For ourWorld of Warcraft boxed products, expansion packs and value-added services, we recognize revenues in each case with the related subscription service revenues ratably over the estimated service period, beginning upon the activation of the software and delivery of the related services. For revenues associated with the sales of subscriptions, the revenues are deferred until the subscription service is activated by the consumer and are then recognized ratably over the subscription period. Revenues attributed to the sale ofWorld of Warcraft boxed software and related expansion packs are classified as "Product sales," whereas revenues attributable to subscriptions and other value-added services are classified as "Subscription, licensing, and other revenues."

      Microtransaction Revenues

            CertainMicrotransaction revenues are derived from the sale of our games are offered to players on a free-to-play basis. Players can purchase virtual goods or microtransactions,and currencies to our players to enhance their gameplay experience. Proceeds from the sales of virtual goods and currencies are initially recorded in deferred revenues. Proceeds from the sales of virtual currencies are recognized as revenues when a player uses the virtual goods purchased with the virtual currency. Proceeds from the sales of virtual goods directly are also recognized as revenues when a player uses the virtual goods. We categorize our virtual goods as either consumable or durable. Consumable virtual goods represent goods that can be consumed by a specific player action; accordingly, we recognize revenues from the sale of consumable virtual goods as the goods are consumed. Durable virtual goods represent virtual goods that are accessible to the player over an extended period of time. Wetime; accordingly, we recognize revenues from the sale of durable virtual goods ratably over the period of time the goods are available to the player, which is generally the estimated service period of the game.period.

      Estimated Service Period

            We determine the estimated service period for players of our games with consideration of various data points, including the weighted-average number of days between players' first and last date played online, the average total hours played, the average number of days in which player activity stabilizes, and the weighted-average number of days between players' first purchase date and last date played online. We also consider known online trends, and the service periods of our previously released games, and disclosedthe service periods forof our competitors' games that are similar in nature.nature to ours, to the extent they are publicly available. Determining the estimated service period is subjective and requires management's judgment. Future usage patterns may differ from historical usage patterns and therefore the estimated service period may change in the future. The estimated service periods for players of our current games isare generally less than twelve months.

      Principal Agent Considerations

            We evaluate sales of our products and content via third party digital storefronts, such as Microsoft's Xbox Games Store, Sony's PSN, the Apple App Store, and the Google Play Store, to determine whether revenues should be reported gross or net of fees retained by the storefront. Key indicators that we evaluate in determining gross versus net treatment include, but are not limited to, the following:

      the party responsible for delivery/fulfillment of the product or service to the consumer;

      the party responsible for consumer billing, fee collection, and refunds;

      Table of Contents

        the storefront and terms of sale that govern the consumer's purchase of the product or service; and

        the party that sets the pricing with the consumer and has credit risk.

              Based on evaluation of the above indicators, we report revenues on a gross basis for sales arrangements via Apple App Store and Google Play Store, and we report revenues on a net basis (i.e., net of fees retained by the storefront) for sales arrangements via Microsoft's Xbox Games Store and Sony PSN.

      Allowances for Returns and Price Protection Doubtful Accounts and Inventory Obsolescence

              We closely monitor and analyze the historical performance of our various titles, the performance of products released by other publishers, market conditions, and the anticipated timing of other releases to assess future demand of current and upcoming titles. Initial volumes shipped upon title launch and subsequent reorders are evaluated with the goal of ensuring that quantities are sufficient to meet the demand from the retail markets, but at the same time are controlled to prevent excess inventory in the channel. We benchmark units to be shipped to our customers using historical and industry data.

              We may permit product returns from, or grant price protection to, our customers under certain conditions. In general, price protection refers to the circumstances in which we elect to decrease, on a short- or longer-term basis, the wholesale price of a product by a certain amount and, when granted and applicable, allow customers a credit against amounts owed by such customers to us with respect to open and/or future invoices. The conditions our customers must meet to be granted the right to return products or receive price protection credits include, among other things, compliance with applicable trading and payment terms achievement of sell-through performance targets in certain instances, and consistent return of inventory and delivery of sell-through reports to us. We may also consider other factors, including achievement of sell-through performance targets in certain instances, the facilitation of slow-moving inventory, and other market factors.


      Table of Contents

              Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the allowance for returns and price protection in any accounting period based on estimates ofrespect to potential future product returns and price protection related to current period product revenues.revenues must be made and used when establishing the allowance for returns and price protection in any accounting period. We estimate the amount of future returns and price protection for current period product revenues utilizing historical experience and information regarding inventory levels and the demand and acceptance of our products by the end consumer. The following factors are used to estimate the amount of future returns and price protection for a particular title: historical performance of titles in similar genres; historical performance of the hardware platform; historical performance of the franchise; console hardware life cycle; sales force and retail customer feedback; industry pricing; future pricing assumptions; weeks of on-hand retail channel inventory; absolute quantity of on-hand retail channel inventory; our warehouse on-hand inventory levels; the title's recent sell-through history (if available); marketing trade programs; and the performance of competing titles. The relative importance of these factors varies among titles depending upon, among other items,things, genre, platform, seasonality, and sales strategy.

              Based upon historical experience, we believe that our estimates are reasonable. However, actual returns and price protection could vary materially from our allowance estimates due to a number of reasons, including, among others: a lack of consumer acceptance of a title, the release in the same period of a similarly themed title by a competitor, or technological obsolescence due to the emergence of new hardware platforms. MaterialThere may be material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenues for any period if factors or market conditions change or if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimatesmatters resolve in a manner that is inconsistent with management's assumptions utilized in determining the allowances for returns and price protection. For example, a 1% change in our December 31, 20152017 allowance for sales returns, price protection, and other allowances would have impacted net revenues by approximately $3 million.


              Similarly, management must make estimates as to the collectabilityTable of our accounts receivable. In estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze the age of current outstanding account balances, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, and changes in our customers' payment terms and their economic condition, as well as whether we can obtain sufficient credit insurance. Any significant changes in any of these criteria would affect management's estimates in establishing our allowance for doubtful accounts.

              We regularly review inventory quantities on-hand and in the retail channels. We write down inventory based on excess or obsolete inventories determined primarily by future anticipated demand for our products. Inventory write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and net realizable value, based upon assumptions about future demand, which are inherently difficult to assess and dependent on market conditions. At the point of loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established basis.Contents

      Software Development Costs and Intellectual Property Licenses

              Software development costs include payments made to independent software developers under development agreements, as well as direct costs incurred for internally developed products. Software development costs are capitalized once the technological feasibility of a product is established and such costs are determined to be recoverable. Technological feasibility of a product encompassesrequires both technical design documentation and game design documentation, or the completed and tested product design and a working model. Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in the assessment of when technological feasibility is established.established and the evaluation is performed on a product-by-product basis. For products where proven technology exists, this may occur early in the development cycle. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Software development costs related to online hosted service revenue arrangements are capitalized after the preliminary project phase is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Prior to a product's release,


      Table of Contents

      if and when we believe capitalized costs are not recoverable, we expense the amounts as part of "Cost of sales—revenues—software royalties, amortization, and amortization.intellectual property licenses." Capitalized costs for products that are cancelled or are expected to be abandoned are charged to "Product development expense"development" in the period of cancellation. Amounts related to software development which are not capitalized are charged immediately to "Product development expense.development."

              Commencing upon a product's release, capitalized software development costs are amortized to "Cost of sales—revenues—software royalties, amortization, and amortization"intellectual property licenses" based on the ratio of current revenues to total projected revenues for the specific product, generally resulting in an amortization period of six months or less, or over the estimated useful life, generallyto approximately one to two years.

              Intellectual property license costs represent license fees paid to intellectual property rights holders for use of their trademarks, copyrights, software, technology, music or other intellectual property or proprietary rights in the development of our products. Depending upon the agreement with the rights holder, we may obtain the right to use the intellectual property in multiple products over a number of years, or alternatively, for a single product. Prior to a product's release, if and when we believe capitalized costs are not recoverable, we expense the amounts as part of "Cost of sales—intellectual property licenses." Capitalized intellectual property costs for products that are cancelled or are expected to be abandoned are charged to "Product development expense" in the period of cancellation.

              Commencing upon a product's release, capitalized intellectual property license costs are amortized to "Cost of sales—intellectual property licenses" based on the ratio of current revenues for the specific product to total projected revenues for all products in which the licensed property will be utilized. As intellectual property license contracts may extend for multiple years and can be used in multiple products to be released over a period beyond one year, the amortization of capitalized intellectual property license costs relating to such contracts may extend beyond one year.

              We evaluate the future recoverability of capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses on a quarterly basis. For products that have been released in prior periods, the primary evaluation criterion is the actual performance of the title performance.to which the costs relate. For products that are scheduled to be released in future periods, recoverability is evaluated based on the expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate or in which the licensed trademark or copyright is to be used.relate. Criteria used to evaluate expected product performance include: historical performance of comparable products developed with comparable technology; market performance of comparable titles; orders for the product prior to its release; general market conditions; and, for any sequel product, estimated performance based on the performance of the product on which the sequel is based. Further, as many of our capitalized intellectual property licenses extend for multiple products over multiple years, we also assess the recoverability of capitalized intellectual property license costs based on certain qualitative factors, such as the success of other products and/or entertainment vehicles utilizing the intellectual property, whether there are any future planned theatrical releases or television series based on the intellectual property, and the rights holder's continued promotion and exploitation of the intellectual property.

              Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in assessing the recoverability of capitalized costs. In evaluating the recoverability of capitalized costs, the assessment of expected product performance utilizes forecasted sales amounts and estimates of additional costs to be incurred. If revised forecasted or actual product sales are less than the originally forecasted amounts utilized in the initial recoverability analysis, the net realizable value may be lower than originally estimated in any given quarter, which could result in an impairment charge. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of expenses for any period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimatesmatters resolve in evaluating these qualitative factors.


      Table of Contentsa manner that is inconsistent with management's expectations.

      Income Taxes

              We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities due to a change in tax rates is


      Table of Contents

      recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We evaluate deferred tax assets each period for recoverability. For those assets that do not meet the threshold of "more likely than not" that they will be realized in the future, a valuation allowance is recorded.

              Management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets. In the event that all or part of the net deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to tax expenses in the period such determination is made. The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of ASC Topic 740 and other complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with management's expectations could have a material impact on our business and results of operations in an interim period in which the uncertainties are ultimately resolved.

              Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest and penalties.

              Our provision for income taxes is subject to volatility and could be adversely impacted byby: (1) earnings being lower than anticipated in foreign regions where taxes are levied at relatively lower statutory rates and/or higher than anticipated in the United States where taxes are levied at relatively higher statutory rates; by(2) changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; by expiration of, or lapses in, the R&D tax credit laws; by(3) tax effects of nondeductible compensation; by(4) tax costs related to intercompany realignments; by(5) differences between amounts included in our tax filings and the estimate of such amounts included in our tax expenses; by(6) changes in accounting principles; or by(7) changes in tax laws, and regulations, administrative practices, principles or interpretations, including possible U.S.fundamental changes to the taxation of earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, the deductibility of expenses attributabletax laws applicable to foreign income, or the foreign tax credit rules.multinational corporations. Significant judgment is required to determine the recognition and measurement attributes prescribed in the accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes. The accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes applies to all income tax positions, including the potential recovery of previously paid taxes, which if settled unfavorably could adversely impact our provision for income taxes. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the IRS and are regularly subject to audit by other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.

              As further described in "Consolidated Results" above, on December 22, 2017, the U.S. Tax Reform Act was enacted. The U.S. Tax Reform Act, among other things, reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018 and implemented a modified territorial tax system that imposes a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries.

              On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on how to account for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act under ASC 740. SAB 118 enables companies to record a provisional amount for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act based on a reasonable estimate, subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year, until accounting is complete.

              We continue to analyze the prospective effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, including new provisions impacting certain foreign income, such as GILTI, BEAT, and FDII, potential limitations on


      Table of Contents

      interest expense deductions, and changes to the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, among other provisions of the U.S. Tax Reform Act. The Company has elected to account for the U.S. Tax Reform Act provisions related to GILTI as period costs if and when incurred pursuant to the FASB Staff Q&A guidance issued in January 2018.

      Fair Value Estimates

              The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP often requires us to determine the fair value of a particular item to fairly present in our Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements. Without an independent market or another representative transaction, determining the fair value of a particular item requires us to make several assumptions that are inherently difficult to predict and can have a material impact on the conclusion of the appropriate accounting.

              There are various valuation techniques used to estimate fair value. These includeinclude: (1) the market approach, where market transactions for identical or comparable assets or liabilities are used to determine the fair value,value; (2) the income approach, which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, future cash flows or future earnings) to a single present amount,amount; and (3) the cost approach, which is based on the amount that would be required to replace an asset. For many of our fair value estimates, including our estimates of the fair value of acquired intangible assets, we use the income approach. Using the income approach requires the use of financial models, which require us to make various estimates including, but not limited toto: (1) the potential future cash flows for the asset, liability or equity instrument being measured,measured; (2) the timing of receipt or payment of those future cash flows,flows; (3) the time value of money associated with the delayed receipt or payment of such cash flows,flows; and (4) the inherent risk associated with the cash flows (that is, the risk premium). Determining these cash flow estimates is inherently difficult and subjective, and, if any of the estimates used to determine the fair value using the income approach turns out to be inaccurate, our financial results may be negatively impacted. Furthermore, relatively small changes in many of these estimates can have a significant impact on the estimated fair value resulting from the financial models or the related accounting conclusion reached. For example, a relatively small change in the estimated fair value of an asset may change a conclusion as to whether an asset is impaired. While we are required to make certain fair value assessments associated with the accounting for several types of transactions, the following areas are the most sensitive to the assessments:

              Business Combinations.    We must estimate the fair value of assetsAssets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.combination are recorded based on their estimated fair value. Our assessment of the estimated fair value of each of these can have a material effect on our reported results as intangible assets are amortized over various estimated useful lives. Furthermore, a change in the estimated fair value of an asset or liability often has a direct impact on the amount towe recognize as goodwill, which is an asset that is not amortized. Often determining the fair value of these assets and liabilities assumed requires an assessment of the expected use of the asset, the expected cost to extinguish the liability or our expectations related to the timing and the successful completion of development of an acquired in-process technology. Such estimates are inherently difficult and subjective and can have a material impact on our financial statements.

              Assessment of Impairment of Definite-lived Intangible and Other Long-lived Assets.    Management evaluatesWe evaluate the recoverability of our identifiable amortizable intangible assets and other long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Subtopic 360-10, which generally requires the assessment of these assets for recoverability when events or circumstances (referred to as a "triggering event") indicate a potential impairment exists. We consideredconsider certain events and circumstances in determining whether a triggering event has occurred that could indicate the carrying value of identifiable definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets, other than indefinite-lived intangible assets, may not be recoverable, including, but not limited to: (1) significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results; (2) significant changes in the use of the assets; (3) significant negative industry or economic trends; (4) a significant decline in our stock price for a


      Table of Contents

      sustained period of time; and (5) changes in our business strategy. In determining whetherIf it is determined that a triggering event has occurred, we determine if an impairment exists webased on an estimate of the undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use and ultimate disposition of these assets.the asset group. If an impairment is indicated based on a comparison of the assets' carrying values and the undiscounted cash flows are lower than the carrying values of the related asset group, an impairment exists and the impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the group's assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.asset group. We did not record an impairment charge to any of our definite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016, and 2013.2015.


      Table        Assessment of ContentsImpairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets.

              Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") literature related    We are required to the accounting fortest goodwill and other intangibles withinindefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis and, if current events or circumstances require, on an interim basis. ASC Topic 350 provides companies an option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value before performing a quantitative two-step approach to testing goodwill for impairment. We perform our impairment test for each reporting unit.unit as part of our annual impairment test performed as of December 31. Our reporting units are determined bybased on the components of our operating segments that constitute a business for which both (1) discrete financial information is available and (2) segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component.guidance within ASC Topic 350 requires that the impairment test be performed at least annually by applying a fair-value-based test. The qualitative assessment is optional.Subtopic 350-20. The first step of the quantitative test measures for impairment by applying fair-value-basedfair value-based tests at the reporting unit level. The second step (if necessary) measures the amount of impairment by applying fair-value-basedfair value-based tests to the individual assets and liabilities within each reporting unit.

              To determine the fair values of the reporting units used in the first step, we use a discounted cash flow approach. Each step requires us to make judgments and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include long-term growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates based on our weighted average cost of capital, and future economic and market conditions. These estimates and assumptions have tomust be made for each reporting unit evaluated for impairment. Our estimates for market growth, our market share and costs are based on historical data, various internal estimates and certain external sources, and are based on assumptions that are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying business. If future forecasts are revised, they may indicate or require future impairment charges. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.

              The fair value of our reporting units is determined using an income approach based on discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of our significant reporting units, units—namely Activision, Blizzard, and King—we assumed a discount raterates ranging from 8.5% to 11.5% and terminal growth rates of approximately 10.0%. The0.0% to 4.0%, depending on the reporting unit and its specific characteristics and risk profiles. Based on our quantitative evaluation, we determined the estimated fair value of bothall of the Activision and Blizzard reporting units exceeded their carrying values as of December 31, 2015. However, changes2017. Changes in our assumptions underlying our estimates of fair value, which will be a function of our future financial performance and changes in economic conditions, could result in future impairment charges.charges

              We test our acquired trade names for possible impairment by using a discounted cash flow model to estimate fair value. We have determinedAt December 31, 2017 and 2016, we concluded that no impairment hashad occurred at December 31, 2015 and 2014 based upon a set of assumptions regarding discounted future cash flows, which represent our best estimate of future performance at this time.that no impairment was reasonably likely to occur. In determining the fair value of ourthese trade names, we assumed a discount rate of 10.0%8.5%, and royalty saving rates of approximately 1.5%—2.0%. A one percentage point increase in the discount rate would not yield an impairment charge to our trade names. Changes in our assumptions underlying our estimates of fair value, which will be a function of our future financial performance and changes in economic conditions, could result in future impairment charges.

      Stock-Based CompensationShare-Based Payments

              We account for stock-based compensationshare-based payments in accordance with ASC TopicSubtopic 718-10Compensation-Stock Compensation, and ASC Subtopic 505-50,Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Stock-based505-50. Share-based compensation expense for a given grant is recognized duringover the requisite service periodsperiod (that is, the period for which the employee is being compensated) and is based on the


      Table of Contents

      value of stock-basedshare-based payment awards after a reduction for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

              We generally estimate the value of stock-based payment awards on the measurement datestock options using a binomial-lattice model. Our determination of fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant


      Table of Contents

      using an option-pricing modelThis estimate is affected by our stock price, as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables, include, but are not limited to,including our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

              We generally determine the fair value of restricted stock rights (including restricted stock units restricted stock awards and performance shares) based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.grant, reduced by the present value of the estimated future dividends during the vesting period in which the restricted stock units holder will not participate. Certain restricted stock rightsunits granted to our employees and senior management vest based on the achievement of pre-established performance or market conditions. We estimate the fair value ofFor performance-based restricted stock rights at the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Eachunits, each quarter we update our assessment of the probability that the specified performance criteria will be achieved. We amortize the fair values of performance-based restricted stock rightsunits over the requisite service period, adjustedadjusting for estimated forfeitures for each separately vesting tranche of the award. WeFor market-based restricted stock units, we estimate the fair value of market-based restricted stock rights at the date of grant using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology and amortize those fair values over the requisite service period, adjustedadjusting for estimated forfeitures for each separately vesting tranche of the award. The Monte Carlo methodology that we use to estimate the fair value of market-based restricted stock rightsunits at the date of grant incorporates into the valuation the possibility that the market condition may not be satisfied. Provided that the requisite service is rendered, the total fair value of the market-based restricted stock rightsunits at the date of grant must be recognized as compensation expense even if the market condition is not achieved. However, the number of shares that ultimately vest can vary significantly with the performance of the specified market criteria.

              For a detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 of the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

      Revenue recognition

              In May 2014,        Below are the FASBrecently issued new accounting guidance relatedpronouncements that were most significant to revenue recognition. The new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminate all industry-specific guidance. The new revenue recognition standard providesour accounting policy activities for fiscal 2017. For a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue upon the transferdetailed discussion of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance will be effective beginning January 1, 2018 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment asrecently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 21 of the date of adoption. We are evaluating the adoption method as well as the impactnotes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this newAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

      Recently adopted accounting guidance on our financial statements.

      Stock-based compensationpronouncements

              In June 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to stock compensation. The new standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented as


      Table of Contents

      an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

      Consolidations

              In February 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to consolidations. The new standard amends certain requirements for determining whether a variable interest entity must be consolidated. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

      Debt Issuance Costs

              In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. The new standard requires an entity to present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The new guidance will be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

      Internal-Use Software

              In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to internal-use software. The new standard relates to a customer's accounting for fees paid in cloud computing arrangements. The amendment provides guidance for customers to determine whether such arrangements include software licenses. If a cloud arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

      Inventory

              In July 2015, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new guidance related to the measurement of inventory which requires inventory within the scope of the guidance to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We adopted this new standard as of January 1, 2017, and applied it prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

      Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

      Revenue recognition

              In May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. The new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminate all industry-specific


      Table of Contents

      guidance, providing a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for us beginning with the first quarter of 2018. We are adopting the accounting standard using the modified retrospective method, which recognizes the cumulative effect upon adoption as an adjustment to retained earnings at the adoption date. We will report our adoption in our Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2018.

              The most significant impacts of the new revenue recognition standard are expected to be:

        The accounting for our sales of our games with significant online functionality for which we do not have VSOE for unspecified future updates and ongoing online services provided.  Under the current accounting standards, VSOE for undelivered elements is required. This requirement will be eliminated under the new standard. Accordingly, we will be required to recognize as revenue a portion of the sales price upon delivery of the software, as compared to the current requirement of recognizing the entire sales price ratably over an estimated service period. We expect this difference to primarily impact revenues from our Call of Duty franchise, where we expect that approximately 20% of the sales price will be recognized as revenue upon delivery of the games to our customers. Many of our other franchises, such as Destiny, Overwatch, World of Warcraft, and Candy Crush, are online hosted arrangements, and we do not expect any significant impact on the accounting for our sales of these games; and

        The accounting for certain of our software licensing arrangements.  While the impacts of the new standard may differ on a contract-by-contract basis (the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the standard will depend on contract-specific terms), we generally expect earlier revenue recognition for these arrangements under the new revenue standard.

              We estimate that the cumulative effect of adopting this standard will result in an adjustment to retained earnings at the adoption date of approximately $60 million to $100 million, inclusive of the associated tax impacts. Additionally, we expect that the new disclosure requirements will require us to design and implement additional internal controls over financial reporting, and we are in process of adjusting our processes and internal controls in preparation for adopting the new standard.

      Leases

              In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to the accounting for leases. The new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic. The new standard, among other things, requires a lessee to classify a lease as either an operating or financing lease, and lessees will need to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for their leases. The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. The asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment for initial direct costs, lease incentives received, and any prepaid lease payments. Operating leases will result in a straight-line expense pattern, while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented, with certain transition practical expedients available to provide relief in adopting the new standard. We are evaluating the impact of this new accounting guidance on our financial statements. Currently, we do not plan to early adopt this new standard but we do expect to elect and apply the available transition practical expedients upon adoption.


      Table of Contents

      Statement of Cash Flows-Restricted Cash

              In November 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to the classification of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The new standard requires that a statement of cash flows explain any change during the period in total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash. Therefore, restricted cash will be included with "Cash and cash equivalents" when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 20162018, and should be applied prospectively.retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

              We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

      Business Combinations

              In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16,Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, providing new guidance related to business combinations. The new standard requires that the cumulative We expect there will be a significant impact of a measurement period adjustment, including the impact on prior periods, made to provisional amounts recorded at the acquisition date as a result of the business combination, be recognized in the reporting period the adjustment is identified. The standard also requires separate presentation on the face of the income statement, or disclosure in the notes, of the portion of the amount recorded in current period earnings by line item. Prior to the issuanceconsolidated statements of cash flows for 2016, as this period includes, as an investing activity, the standard, such adjustments to provisional amounts were recognized retrospectively. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and should be applied prospectively to


      Table$3.6 billion movement in restricted cash resulting from the transfer of Contents

      measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this new accounting guidance could have a material impact on our financial statements in future periods upon occurrence of a measurement period adjustment.

      Deferred Taxes

              In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, providing new guidance to simplify the presentation of deferred taxes. The new standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as non-current on the balance sheet. The issuance of the new standard eliminates the requirement to perform the jurisdiction analysis based on the classifications of the underlying assets and liabilities, and as a result, each jurisdiction will only have one net non-current deferred tax asset or liability. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

              As ofcash into escrow at December 31, 2015, we early adopted ASU No. 2015-17to facilitate the King Acquisition and applied retrospectively to all periods presented. As a result, we reclassified $368 millionthe subsequent release of deferred tax assets from current "Deferred income taxes, net" resultingthat cash in non-current net deferred tax assets and liabilities of $264 million and $10 million, respectively,2016 in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014. The adoption ofconnection with the King Acquisition. Under this new guidance didstandard, the restricted cash balance will be included in the beginning and ending total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balances and, hence, would not impact our compliance with debt covenant requirements.be included as an investing activity in the statement of cash flows.

      Item 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

              Market risk is the potential loss arising from fluctuations in market rates and prices. Our market risk exposures primarily include fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.

      Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

              We transact business in many different foreign currencies and may be exposed to financial market risk resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Revenues and related expenses generated from our international operations are generally denominated in their respective local currencies. Primary currencies include euros,Euros, British pounds, Australian dollars, South Korean won, Chinese yuan, and Swedish krona. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency-denominated transactions resultswill result in reduced revenues, operating expenses, net income, and cash flows from our international operations. Similarly, our revenues, operating expenses, net income, and cash flows will increase for our international operations if the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies. Since we have significant international sales, but incur the majority of our costs in the United States, the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, may have an asymmetric and disproportional impact on our business. We monitor currency volatility throughout the year.

              To mitigate our foreign currency risk resulting from our foreign currency-denominated monetary assets, liabilities, and earnings and our foreign currency risk related to functional currency-equivalent cash flows resulting from our intercompany transactions, we periodically enter into currency derivative contracts, principally forward contracts. These forward contracts generally have a maturity of less than one year. The counterparties for our currency derivative contracts are large and reputable commercial or investment banks.

              We assess the nature of these derivatives under FASB ASC Topic 815 to determine whether such derivatives should be designated as hedging instruments. The fair value of foreign currency contracts are estimated based on the prevailing exchange rates of the various hedged currencies as of the end of the period. We report the fair value of these contracts within "Other current assets," "Accrued expense and other liabilities," "Other assets," or "Other liabilities," as applicable, in our Consolidated Balance


      Table of Contents

      Sheets based on the prevailing exchange rates of the various hedged currencies as of the end of the relevant period.

              We do not hold or purchase any foreign currency forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

      Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Not Designated as Hedges

              For a detailed discussion of our accounting policies for our foreign currency forward contracts, entered into to mitigate risk from foreign currency-denominated monetary assets, liabilities, and earnings that are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815, changes in the estimated fair value of these derivatives are recorded within "General and administrative expenses" and "Interest and other expense, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, consistent with the naturesee Note 2 of the underlying transactions.

              At December 31, 2015, the gross notional amountnotes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedges was approximately $489 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we reclassified $8 million of unrealized gains out of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and into earnings due to dedesignating $250 million notional euro to U.S. dollar cash flow hedges when it was determined the hedged transaction would not occur. As a result of the dedesignation, we entered into offsetting foreign currency forward contracts. The dedesignated and offsetting foreign currency forward contracts remain outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

              The fair value of these foreign currency forward currency contracts was $11 million as of December 31, 2015, and recorded in "Other current assets" in our consolidated balance sheet.

              At December 31, 2014, outstanding foreign currency forward contracts not designated as a hedge were not material.

              For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, pre-tax net gains associated with these forward contracts were recorded in "General and administrative expenses" and were not material.

      Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Designated as Hedges

              For foreign currency forward contracts that we entered into to hedge forecasted intercompany cash flows that are subject to foreign currency risk, and which have been designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with ASC 815, we assess the effectiveness of these cash flow hedges at inception andthis Annual Report on an ongoing basis and determine if the hedges are effective at providing offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. The Company records the effective portion of changes in the estimated fair value of these derivatives in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and subsequently reclassifies the related amount of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings within "General and administrative expenses" when the hedged item impacts earnings. Cash flows from these foreign currency forward contracts are classified in the same category as the cash flows associated with the hedged item in the consolidated statements of cash flows. We measures hedge ineffectiveness, if any, and if it is determined that a derivative has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge accounting for the derivative.

              The gross notional amount of all outstanding foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges was approximately $381 million at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges. These foreign currency forward contracts have remaining maturities of 12 months or less. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no ineffectiveness relating to these hedges. At December 31, 2015, $4 million of net unrealized losses related to these contracts are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months.Form 10-K.


      Table of Contents

      Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Designated as Hedges ("Cash Flow Hedges")

              At December 31, 2017, the gross notional amount of outstanding Cash Flow Hedges was approximately $521 million. The fair value of these contracts, all of which have remaining maturities of 12 months or less, was $5 million of net unrealized losses. Additionally, at December 31, 2017, we had approximately $10 million of net realized but unrecognized losses recorded within "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" associated with contracts that had settled but were deferred and will be amortized into earnings, along with the associated hedged revenues. Such amounts will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months.

              At December 31, 2016, the gross notional amount of outstanding Cash Flow Hedges was approximately $346 million. The fair value of these contracts was $22 million of net unrealized gains.

              During the yearyears ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, there was no ineffectiveness relating to our Cash Flow Hedges. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the amount of pre-tax net realized gains of $6 million and $8 million, respectively, associated with these contracts that were reclassified out of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)"loss" and into "General and administrative expense" due to maturity of these contracts.earnings was not material.

              In the absence of the hedging activities described above, for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, a hypothetical adverse foreign currency exchange rate movement of 10% would have resulted in potential declines of our net income of approximately $121$134 million. This sensitivity analysis assumes a parallel adverse shift of all foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar; however, all foreign currency exchange rates do not always move in such manner and actual results may differ materially.

      Interest Rate Risk

              Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio and variable rate debt under the Credit Facilities.our credit agreement. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016, a hypothetical interest rate change on our variable rate debt of one percent (100 basis points) would changehave changed interest expense on an annual basis by approximately $19 million. Because we have a 0.75% LIBOR floor in our Term Loan, our interest expense will only increase if the underlying interest rate increases to a level that exceeds the LIBOR floor.$10 million and $27 million, respectively. This estimate does not include a change in interest income from our investment portfolio that may result from such a hypothetical interest rate change nor does it include the effects of other actions that we may take in the future to mitigate this risk or any changes in our financial structure. Refer to Note 11 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for disclosures regarding terms and interest rates associated with our debt obligations.

              Our investment portfolio consists primarily of money market funds and government securities with high credit quality and short average maturities. Because short-term securities mature relatively quickly and must be reinvested at the then-current market rates, interest income on a portfolio consisting of cash, cash equivalents, or short-term securities is more subject to market fluctuations than a portfolio of longer termlonger-term securities. Conversely, the fair value of such a portfolio is less sensitive to market fluctuations than a portfolio of longer-term securities. At December 31, 2015,2017, our $1.82$4.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents werewas comprised primarily of money market funds. At December 31, 2015, our $8 million of short-term investments included $8 million of restricted cash. We also had $9 million in auction rate securities at fair value classified as long-term investments at December 31, 2015.

              The Company has determined that, based on the composition of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2015,2017, there was no material interest rate risk exposure to the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity as of that date.


      Table of Contents

      Item 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

       F-1

      Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20152017 and 20142016

       F-2
      F-3

      Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015

       F-3
      F-4

      Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015

       F-4
      F-5

      Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015

       F-5
      F-6

      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015

       F-6
      F-7

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

       F-7
      F-8

      Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts at December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015

       F-55
      F-60

              Other financial statement schedules are omitted because the information called for is not applicable or is shown either in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.

      Item 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

              None.

      Item 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

      Definition and Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

              Our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"))Act) are designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i)is: (1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii)(2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports. Inherent limitations to any system of disclosure controls and procedures include, but are not limited to, the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of such controls by one or more persons. In addition, we have designed our system of controls based on certain assumptions, which we believe are reasonable, about the likelihood of future events, and our system of controls may therefore not achieve its desired objectives under all possible future events.

      Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

              Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures at December 31, 2015,2017, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, at December 31, 2015,2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i)(1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, and (ii)(2) accumulated and communicated to our


      Table of Contents

      management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.


      Table of Contents

      Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

              Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.Act). Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness, as of December 31, 2015,2017, of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.2017.

              Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

              The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152017 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

              There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

      Item 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

              None.


      Table of Contents


      PART III

      Item 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

              The information required by this Item, other than the information regarding executive officers, which is included in Item 1 of this report, is incorporated by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders entitled "Proposal 1—Election of Directors," "Executive Officers," "Section"Beneficial Ownership Matters—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," "Corporate Governance Matters—Code of Conduct," and "Corporate Governance Matters—Board of Directors and Committees—Board Committees" to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

      Item 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

              The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders entitled "Executive Compensation" and "Director"Proposal 2—Director Compensation" to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

      Item 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

              The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders entitled "Equity Compensation Plan Information" and "Beneficial Ownership Matters" to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

      Item 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

              The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders entitled "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Corporate Governance Matters—Board of Directors and Committees" to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

      Item 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

              The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders entitled "Audit-Related Matters" to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.


      Table of Contents


      PART IV

      Item 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

      (a) 1 Financial Statements See Item 8.—Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule on page [89]81 herein.

       

       

      2

       

      Financial Statement Schedule The following financial statement schedule of Activision Blizzard for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015 is filed as part of this report on page F-60 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Activision Blizzard:

      Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

       

       

       

       

      Other financial statement schedules are omitted because the information called for is not applicable or is shown either in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.

       

       

      3

       

      The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits immediately following the financial statements are filed as part of, or hereby incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      Item 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY

              Not applicable.


      Table of Contents


      SIGNATURE

              Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Activision Blizzard, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

      Date: February 29, 2016

      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.

      By:


      /s/ ROBERT A. KOTICK

      Robert A. Kotick
      Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Activision Blizzard, Inc.
      (Principal Executive Officer)



      POWER OF ATTORNEY

              Each individual whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert A. Kotick, and Dennis Durkin and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of substitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his, her or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done or by virtue hereof.

              Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

      By:/s/ ROBERT A. KOTICK

      (Robert A. Kotick)
      Director, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive OfficerFebruary 29, 2016

      By:


      /s/ DENNIS DURKIN


      (Dennis Durkin)



      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ STEPHEN WEREB


      (Stephen Wereb)



      Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ ROBERT J. CORTI


      (Robert J. Corti)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      Table of Contents

      By:

      /s/ BRIAN G. KELLY


      (Brian G. Kelly)

      Chairman and Director

      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ HENDRIK J. HARTONG III


      (Hendrik J. Hartong III)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ BARRY MEYER


      (Barry Meyer)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ ROBERT J. MORGADO


      (Robert J. Morgado)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ PETER NOLAN


      (Peter Nolan)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ CASEY WASSERMAN


      (Casey Wasserman)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      By:


      /s/ ELAINE P. WYNN


      (Elaine P. Wynn)



      Director



      February 29, 2016


      Table of Contents


      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

              To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Activision Blizzard, Inc.:

              In our opinion,Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

              We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Activision Blizzard, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of changes in shareholders' equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(2), (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

              In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Activision Blizzard, Inc. and its subsidiaries atthe Company as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20152017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ofCOSO.

      Change in Accounting Principle

              As discussed in Note 2 to the Treadway Commission (COSO).consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for income taxes related to share-based payments in 2016.

      Basis for Opinions

              The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on thesethe Company's consolidated financial statements on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

              We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

              Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and


      Table of Contents

      evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

      Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

              A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

              Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

      Los Angeles, California
      February 29, 201627, 2018

      We have served as the Company's auditor since 2008.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

      (Amounts in millions, except share data)


       At December 31,
      2015
       At December 31,
      2014
        At December 31,
      2017
       At December 31,
      2016
       

      Assets

                

      Current assets:

                

      Cash and cash equivalents

       $1,823 $4,848  $4,713 $3,245 

      Short-term investments

       8 10 

      Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $343 and $383 at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

       679 659 

      Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $279 and $261, at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively

       918 732 

      Inventories, net

       128 123  46 49 

      Software development

       336 452  367 412 

      Intellectual property licenses

       30 5 

      Other current assets

       383 444  476 392 

      Total current assets

       3,387 6,541  6,520 4,830 

      Cash in escrow

       3,561  

      Long-term investments

       9 9 

      Software development

       80 20  86 54 

      Intellectual property licenses

        18 

      Property and equipment, net

       189 157  294 258 

      Deferred income taxes, net

       275 264  459 283 

      Other assets

       173 85  440 401 

      Intangible assets, net

       49 29  1,106 1,858 

      Trademark and trade names

       433 433 

      Goodwill

       7,095 7,086  9,763 9,768 

      Total assets

       $15,251 $14,642  $18,668 $17,452 

      Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

                

      Current liabilities:

                

      Accounts payable

       $284 $325  $323 $222 

      Deferred revenues

       1,702 1,797  1,929 1,628 

      Accrued expenses and other liabilities

       625 592  1,411 806 

      Total current liabilities

       2,611 2,714  3,663 2,656 

      Long-term debt, net

       4,079 4,324  4,390 4,887 

      Deferred income taxes, net

       10 10  21 44 

      Other liabilities

       483 361  1,132 746 

      Total liabilities

       7,183 7,409  9,206 8,333 

      Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)

                

      Shareholders' equity:

       
       
       
       
        
       
       
       
       

      Common stock, $0.000001 par value, 2,400,000,000 shares authorized, 1,163,179,140 and 1,150,605,926 shares issued at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

         

      Common stock, $0.000001 par value, 2,400,000,000 shares authorized, 1,186,181,666 and 1,174,163,069 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively

         

      Additional paid-in capital

       10,242 9,924  10,747 10,442 

      Less: Treasury stock, at cost, 428,676,471 shares at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014

       (5,637) (5,762)

      Less: Treasury stock, at cost, 428,676,471 shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

       (5,563) (5,563)

      Retained earnings

       4,096 3,374  4,916 4,869 

      Accumulated other comprehensive loss

       (633) (303) (638) (629)

      Total shareholders' equity

       8,068 7,233  9,462 9,119 

      Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

       $15,251 $14,642  $18,668 $17,452 

         

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

      (Amounts in millions, except per share data)


       For the Years Ended
      December 31,
        For the Years Ended
      December 31,
       

       2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

      Net revenues

                    

      Product sales

       $2,447 $2,786 $3,201  $2,110 $2,196 $2,447 

      Subscription, licensing, and other revenues

       2,217 1,622 1,382  4,907 4,412 2,217 

      Total net revenues

       4,664 4,408 4,583  7,017 6,608 4,664 

      Costs and expenses

       
       
       
       
       
       
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Cost of sales—product costs

       921 999 1,053 

      Cost of sales—online

       224 232 204 

      Cost of sales—software royalties and amortization

       412 260 187 

      Cost of sales—intellectual property licenses

       28 34 87 

      Cost of revenues—product sales:

             

      Product costs

       733 741 872 

      Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses

       300 331 370 

      Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues:

             

      Game operations and distribution costs

       984 851 274 

      Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses

       484 471 69 

      Product development

       646 571 584  1,069 958 646 

      Sales and marketing

       734 712 606  1,378 1,210 734 

      General and administrative

       380 417 490  760 634 380 

      Total costs and expenses

       3,345 3,225 3,211  5,708 5,196 3,345 

      Operating income

       
      1,319
       
      1,183
       
      1,372
        
      1,309
       
      1,412
       
      1,319
       

      Interest and other expense, net

       
      198
       
      202
       
      53
       

      Interest and other expense (income), net

       
      146
       
      214
       
      198
       

      Loss on extinguishment of debt

       12 92  

      Income before income tax expense

       
      1,121
       
      981
       
      1,319
        
      1,151
       
      1,106
       
      1,121
       

      Income tax expense

       
      229
       
      146
       
      309
        
      878
       
      140
       
      229
       

      Net income

       
      $

      892
       
      $

      835
       
      $

      1,010
        $273 $966 $892 

      Earnings per common share

       
       
       
       
       
       
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Basic

       $1.21 $1.14 $0.96  $0.36 $1.30 $1.21 

      Diluted

       $1.19 $1.13 $0.95  $0.36 $1.28 $1.19 

      Weighted-average number of shares outstanding

       
       
       
       
       
       
        
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Basic

       728 716 1,024  754 740 728 

      Diluted

       739 726 1,035  766 754 739 

      Dividends per common share

       
      $

      0.23
       
      $

      0.20
       
      $

      0.19
        
      $

      0.30
       
      $

      0.26
       
      $

      0.23
       

         

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

      (Amounts in millions)


       For the Years Ended
      December 31,
        For the Years Ended
      December 31,
       

       2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

      Net income

       $892 $835 $1,010  $273 $966 $892 

      Other comprehensive income (loss):

              
       
       
       
       
       
       

      Foreign currency translation adjustment

       (326) (371) 93 

      Unrealized losses on forward contracts designated as hedges, net of tax

       (4)   

      Unrealized gains on investments, net of tax

         1 

      Foreign currency translation adjustments

       36 (29) (326)

      Unrealized gains (losses) on forward contracts designated as hedges, net of tax

       (44) 33 (4)

      Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax

       (1)   

      Other comprehensive income (loss)

       $(330)$(371)$94 

      Total other comprehensive income (loss)

       $(9)$4 $(330)

      Comprehensive income

       
      $

      562
       
      $

      464
       
      $

      1,104
        $264 $970 $562 

         

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

      For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013

      2015

      (Amounts and shares in millions, except per share data)


       Common Stock Treasury Stock  
        
       Accumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income (Loss)
        
        Common Stock Treasury Stock  
        
       Accumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income (Loss)
        
       

       Additional
      Paid-In
      Capital
       Retained
      Earnings
       Total
      Shareholders'
      Equity
        Additional
      Paid-In
      Capital
       Retained
      Earnings
       Total
      Shareholders'
      Equity
       

       Shares Amount Shares AmountAccumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income (Loss)
       Shares Amount Shares AmountAccumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income (Loss)

      Balance at December 31, 2012

       1,112 $  $ $9,450 $1,893 $(26)$11,317

      Components of comprehensive income:

                      

      Net income

            1,010  1,010 

      Other comprehensive income (loss)

             94 94 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock options

       16    158   158 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock rights

       8        

      Restricted stock surrendered for employees' tax liability

       (4)    (49)   (49)

      Tax benefit associated with employee stock awards

           11   11 

      Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock rights

           112   112 

      Dividends ($0.19 per common share)

            (217)  (217)

      Shares repurchased (see Note 17)

         (429) (5,830)    (5,830)

      Indemnity on tax attributes assumed in connection with the Purchase Transaction (see Note 15)

          16    16 

      Balance at December 31, 2013

       1,132 $ (429)$(5,814)$9,682 $2,686 $68 $6,622 

      Components of comprehensive income:

                       

      Net income

            835  835 

      Other comprehensive income (loss)

             (371) (371)

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock options

       14    172   172 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock rights

       7        

      Restricted stock surrendered for employees' tax liability

       (2)    (66)   (66)

      Tax benefit associated with employee stock awards

           30   30 

      Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock rights

           106   106 

      Dividends ($0.20 per common share)

            (147)  (147)

      Indemnity on tax attributes assumed in connection with the Purchase Transaction (see Note 15)

          52    52 

      Balance at December 31, 2014

       1,151 $ (429)$(5,762)$9,924 $3,374 $(303)$7,233  1,151 $ (429)$(5,762)$9,924 $3,374 $(303)$7,233 

      Components of comprehensive income:

                                        

      Net income

            892  892       892  892 

      Other comprehensive income (loss)

             (330) (330)       (330) (330)

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock options

       8    106   106  8    106   106 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock rights

       7        

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock units

       7        

      Restricted stock surrendered for employees' tax liability

       (3)    (83)   (83) (3)    (83)   (83)

      Tax benefit associated with employee stock awards

           65   65      65   65 

      Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock rights

           95   95 

      Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock units

           95   95 

      Dividends ($0.23 per common share)

            (170)  (170)      (170)  (170)

      Indemnity on tax attributes assumed in connection with the Purchase Transaction (see Note 15)

          58    58     58    58 

      Shareholder settlement in connection with the Purchase Transaction (see Note 19)

          67 135   202     67 135   202 

      Balance at December 31, 2015

       1,163 $ (429)$(5,637)$10,242 $4,096 $(633)$8,068  1,163 $ (429)$(5,637)$10,242 $4,096 $(633)$8,068 

      Components of comprehensive income:

                       

      Net income

            966  966 

      Other comprehensive income (loss)

             4 4 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock options

       7    105   105 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock units

       7        

      Restricted stock surrendered for employees' tax liability

       (3)    (116)   (116)

      Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock units

           135   135 

      Share-based compensation assumed in acquisition (see Note 20)

               76     76 

      Dividends ($0.26 per common share)

            (193)  (193)

      Indemnity on tax attributes assumed in connection with the Purchase Transaction (see Note 15)

          74    74 

      Balance at December 31, 2016

       1,174 $ (429)$(5,563)$10,442 $4,869 $(629)$9,119 

      Components of comprehensive income:

                       

      Net income

            273  273 

      Other comprehensive income (loss)

             (9) (9)

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock options

       11    178   178 

      Issuance of common stock pursuant to restricted stock units

       2        

      Restricted stock surrendered for employees' tax liability

       (1)    (54)   (54)

      Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and restricted stock units

           181   181 

      Dividends ($0.30 per common share)

            (226)  (226)

      Balance at December 31, 2017

       1,186 $ (429)$(5,563)$10,747 $4,916 $(638)$9,462 

         

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

      (Amounts in millions)


       For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended
      December 31,
       

       2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

      Cash flows from operating activities:

                    

      Net income

       $892 $835 $1,010  $273 $966 $892 

      Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                    

      Deferred income taxes

       (27) (44) 161  (181) (9) (27)

      Provision for inventories

       43 39 33  33 42 43 

      Depreciation and amortization

       95 90 108  888 829 95 

      Loss on disposal of property and equipment

        1  

      Amortization of capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses(1)

       399 256 207  311 321 399 

      Amortization of debt discount and debt financing costs

       7 7 1 

      Stock-based compensation expense(2)

       92 104 108 

      Excess tax benefits from stock awards

       (67) (39) (29)

      Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

             

      Premium payment for early redemption of note

        63  

      Amortization of debt discount, financing costs, and non-cash write-off due to extinguishment of debts

       24 50 7 

      Share-based compensation expense(2)

       176 147 92 

      Other

       28 4  

      Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from business acquisitions:

             

      Accounts receivable, net

       (40) (177) 198  (165) 84 (40)

      Inventories

       (54) (2) 6  (26) 32 (54)

      Software development and intellectual property licenses

       (350) (349) (268) (301) (362) (350)

      Other assets

       21 18 (67) (97) (10) 21 

      Deferred revenues

       (27) 475 (275) 220 (35) (27)

      Accounts payable

       (25) (12) 7  85 (50) (25)

      Accrued expenses and other liabilities

       233 90 64  945 83 233 

      Net cash provided by operating activities

       1,192 1,292 1,264  2,213 2,155 1,259 

      Cash flows from investing activities:

                    

      Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments

       145 21 304  80  145 

      Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments

         98 

      Purchases of available-for-sale investments

       (145)  (26) (135)  (145)

      Acquisition of business (see Note 23)

       (46)   

      Cash in escrow (see Note 24)

       (3,561)   

      Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired (see Note 20)

        (4,588) (46)

      Release (deposit) of cash in escrow

        3,561 (3,561)

      Capital expenditures

       (111) (107) (74) (155) (136) (111)

      Decrease in restricted cash

       2 2 6 

      Other investing activities

       13 (14) 2 

      Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

       (3,716) (84) 308 

      Net cash used in investing activities

       (197) (1,177) (3,716)

      Cash flows from financing activities:

                    

      Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees

       106 175 158  178 106 106 

      Tax payment related to net share settlements on restricted stock rights

       (83) (66) (49)

      Excess tax benefits from stock awards

       67 39 29 

      Repurchase of common stock

         (5,830)

      Tax payment related to net share settlements on restricted stock units

       (56) (115) (83)

      Dividends paid

       (170) (147) (216) (226) (195) (170)

      Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

         4,750 

      Proceeds from debt issuances, net of discounts

       3,741 6,878  

      Repayment of long-term debt

       (250) (375) (6) (4,251) (6,104) (250)

      Payment of debt financing costs

       (7)  (59)

      Proceeds received from shareholder settlement

       202   

      Premium payment for early redemption of note

        (63)  

      Proceeds received from shareholder settlement (see Note 19)

         202 

      Other financing activities

       (10) (7) (7)

      Net cash used in financing activities

       (135) (374) (1,223)

      Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

       (624) 500 (202)

      Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

       (366) (396) 102  76 (56) (366)

      Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

       (3,025) 438 451 

      Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

       1,468 1,422 (3,025)

      Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

       4,848 4,410 3,959  3,245 1,823 4,848 

      Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

       $1,823 $4,848 $4,410  $4,713 $3,245 $1,823 

      (1)
      Excludes deferral and amortization of stock-basedshare-based compensation expense.

      (2)
      Includes the net effects of capitalization, deferral, and amortization of stock-basedshare-based compensation expense.

         

      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

      1. Description of Business

              Activision Blizzard, Inc. ("Activision Blizzard") is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment.entertainment content and services. We develop and distribute content and services on video game consoles, personal computers ("PC"), and mobile devices. We also operate esports events and leagues and create film and television content based on our games. The terms "Activision Blizzard," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" are used to refer collectively to Activision Blizzard, Inc. and its subsidiaries. We currently offer games for video game consoles, personal computers ("PC"),

              The Company was originally incorporated in California in 1979 and handheld, mobile and tablet devices. We maintain significant operationswas reincorporated in the United States ("U.S."), Canada, the United Kingdom ("U.K."), France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, Australia, South Korea and China.

      The King Acquisition

              On November 2, 2015, we and King Digital Entertainment plc, a leading interactive entertainment company for the mobile world incorporated under the laws of Ireland ("King"), entered into a Transaction Agreement (the "Transaction Agreement") under the terms of which we would acquire King (the "King Acquisition") and King would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. On February 23, 2016 we completed the King Acquisition as further describedDelaware in Note 24 below.

              As the closing of the King Acquisition occurred subsequent to December 31, 2015, our financial results as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 do not contain the results of King.

      The Business Combination and Share Repurchase

              Activision Blizzard is the result of1992. In connection with the 2008 business combination ("Business Combination") by and among the Company (then known as Activision, Inc., Sego Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision, Inc.), Vivendi S.A. ("Vivendi"), VGAC LLC, aand Vivendi Games, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi, and Vivendi Games, Inc. ("Vivendi Games"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of VGAC LLC. As a result of the consummation of the Business Combination, Activision, Inc. waswe were renamed Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Vivendi became a majority shareholder of Activision.

              The common stock of Activision Blizzard is traded on The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market under the ticker symbol "ATVI."

      The King Acquisition

              On October 11, 2013,February 23, 2016 (the "King Closing Date"), we repurchased approximately 429 millionacquired King Digital Entertainment, a leading interactive mobile entertainment company ("King"), by purchasing all of its outstanding shares (the "King Acquisition"), as further described in Note 20. Our consolidated financial statements include the operations of King commencing on the King Closing Date.

      Our Segments

              As part of the continued implementation of our common stock, pursuantesports strategy, we instituted changes to our internal organization and reporting structure such that the Major League Gaming ("MLG") business now operates as a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agreement"division of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. ("Blizzard") we entered into. As such, commencing with Vivendi and ASAC II LP ("ASAC"), an exempted limited partnership established under the lawssecond quarter of 2017, MLG, which was previously a separate operating segment, is now a component of the Cayman Islands, acting by its general partner, ASAC II LLC. Pursuant toBlizzard operating segment. MLG is responsible for the termsoperations of the Stock Purchase Agreement,Overwatch League™, along with other esports events, and will also continue to serve as a multi-platform network for other Activision Blizzard esports content.

              Based upon our organizational structure, we acquired allconduct our business through three reportable operating segments as follows:

      (i) Activision Publishing, Inc.

              Activision Publishing, Inc. ("Activision") is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive software products and entertainment content, particularly for the capital stockconsole platform. Activision primarily delivers content through retail and digital channels, including full-game and in-game sales, as well as by licensing software to third-party or related-party companies that distribute Activision products. Activision develops, markets, and sells products based on our internally developed intellectual properties, as well as some licensed properties. We have also established a long-term alliance with Bungie to publish its game universe, Destiny.

              Activision's key product franchises include: Call of Amber Holding Subsidiary Co.Duty®, a Delaware corporationfirst-person shooter for the console and wholly-owned subsidiaryPC platforms, and Destiny, an online universe of Vivendi ("New VH"first-person action gameplay (which we call a "shared-world shooter"), which was for the direct owner of approximately 429 million shares of our common stock, for a cash payment of $5.83 billion, or $13.60 per share, before taking into account the benefit to the Company of certain tax attributes of New VH assumed in the transaction (collectively, the "Purchase Transaction"). Refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the financing of the Purchase Transaction

              Immediately following the completion of the Purchase Transaction, ASAC purchased from Vivendi 172 million shares of Activision Blizzard's common stock, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, for a cash payment of $2.34 billion, or $13.60 per share (the "Private Sale"). Robert A. Kotick, our Chief Executive Officer,console and Brian G. Kelly, Chairman of our Board of Directors, are affiliates of ASAC II LLC.PC platforms.


      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

      1. Description of Business (Continued)

              On May 28, 2014, Vivendi sold approximately 41 million shares, or approximately 50% of its then-current holdings, of our common stock in a registered public offering. Vivendi received proceeds of approximately $850 million from that sale; we did not receive any proceeds.

              As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately 734 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding. At that date, (i) Vivendi held 41 million shares, or approximately 6% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) ASAC held 172 million shares, or approximately 23% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and (iii) our other stockholders held approximately 71% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

              On January 13, 2016, Vivendi sold all of their remaining shares of our common stock. We did not receive any proceeds.

              Based upon our organizational structure, we conduct our business through two reportable operating segments, Activision Publishing, Inc. and Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. Previously, we reported "Distribution" as a reportable segment. In the current period, this was no longer deemed a separate reportable segment and is included in "Other", along with our recently announced media networks and film and television studio businesses.

      (i) Activision Publishing, Inc.

              Activision Publishing, Inc. ("Activision")Blizzard is a leading internationalglobal developer and publisher of interactive software products and content. Activisionentertainment content, particularly for the PC platform. Blizzard primarily delivers content to a broad range of gamers, ranging from children to adults, and from core gamers to mass-market consumers to "value" buyers seeking budget-priced software, in a variety of geographies. Activision develops games based on internally-developed properties, including games in the Call of Duty® and Skylanders® franchises, and to a lesser extent, based on licensed intellectual properties. Additionally, we have established a long-term alliance with Bungie to publish its game universe,Destiny®. Activision sells games through both retail and digital online channels. Activision currently offers gameschannels, including subscriptions, full-game, and in-game sales, as well as by licensing software to third-party or related-party companies that operate on the Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") Xbox One ("Xbox One") and Xbox 360 ("Xbox 360"), Nintendo Co. Ltd. ("Nintendo") Wii U ("Wii U") and Wii ("Wii"), and Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. ("Sony") PlayStation 4 ("PS4") and PlayStation 3 ("PS3") console systems (Xbox One, Wii U, and PS4 are collectively referred to as "next-generation"; Xbox 360, Wii, and PS3 are collectively referred to as "prior-generation"); the PC; the Nintendo 3DS, Nintendo Dual Screen, and Sony PlayStation Vita handheld game systems; and mobile and tablet devices.

      (ii)distribute Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.

      products. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. ("Blizzard") is a leader in online PC gaming, including the subscription-based massively multi-player online role-playing game ("MMORPG") category in terms of both subscriber base and revenues generated through its World of Warcraft® franchise. Blizzard also develops, markets, and sells role-playing action and strategy games for the PC, console, mobile and tablet platforms, including games in the multiple-award winning Diablo®, StarCraft®, Hearthstone®: Heroes of Warcraft™ and Heroes of the Storm™ franchises. In addition, Blizzard maintains a proprietary online gaming service, Blizzard Battle.net®, which facilitates digital distribution of Blizzard content, along with Activision'sDestiny 2 PC content, online social connectivity, and the creation of user-generated content. As noted above, Blizzard also includes the activities of our MLG business, which is responsible for the operations of the Overwatch League, along with other esports events, and will also continue to serve as a multi-platform network for other Activision Blizzard esports content.

              Blizzard's key product franchises include: World of Warcraft®, a subscription-based massive multi-player online role-playing game for PC; StarCraft®, a real-time strategy PC franchise; Diablo®, an action role-playing franchise for the PC and console platforms; Hearthstone®, an online collectible card franchise for the PC and mobile platforms; Heroes of the Storm®, a free-to-play team brawler for PC; and Overwatch®, a team-based first-person shooter for the PC and console platforms.

      (iii) King Digital Entertainment

              King Digital Entertainment ("King") is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment content digital distribution and online social connectivity across all Blizzard games. Blizzardservices, particularly on mobile platforms, such as Google Inc.'s ("Google") Android and Apple Inc.'s ("Apple") iOS. King also distributes its productscontent and generates revenues worldwide through various means,services on the PC platform, primarily via Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook"). King's games are free to play, however, players can acquire in-game items, either with virtual currency the players purchase or directly using real currency.

              King's key product franchises, all of which are for the mobile and PC platforms, include: Candy Crush™, which features "match three" games; Farm Heroes™, which also features "match three" games; and Bubble Witch™, which features "bubble shooter" games.

      Other

              We also engage in other businesses that do not represent reportable segments, including: subscriptions;

        the Activision Blizzard Studios ("Studios") business, which is devoted to creating original film and television content based on our library of globally recognized intellectual properties, and which, in October 2017, released the second season of the animated TV seriesSkylandersAcademy on Netflix; and

        the Activision Blizzard Distribution ("Distribution") business, which consists of operations in Europe that provide warehousing, logistics, and sales distribution services to third-party publishers of prepaid subscription cards; in-game purchasesinteractive entertainment software, our own publishing operations, and services; retail salesmanufacturers of physical "boxed" products;

        interactive entertainment hardware.

      Table of Contents


      ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

      1. Description of Business (Continued)

      online download sales of PC products; purchases and downloads via third-party console, mobile and tablet platforms; and licensing of software to third-party or related party companies that distribute Blizzard products.

      (iii) Other

              We also engage in other business opportunities including:

        The Activision Blizzard Media Networks ("Media Networks") business, announced in 2015 which builds on our efforts in competitive gaming and the growing eSports industry;

        The Activision Blizzard Studios ("Studios") business, announced in 2015 which is devoted to creating original film and television content based on the company's extensive library of iconic and globally-recognized intellectual properties; and

        The Activision Blizzard Distribution ("Distribution") business, which consists of operations in Europe that provide warehousing, logistical, and sales distribution services to third-party publishers of interactive entertainment software, our own publishing operations, and manufacturers of interactive entertainment hardware.

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

        Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

                The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

                Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year amounts to conform to the current period presentation.

                The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued, to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosures.

        Cash and Cash Equivalents

                We consider all money market funds and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be "Cash and cash equivalents."

        Investment Securities

                Investments designated as available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices for such securities, if available, or is estimated on the basis of quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics. Unrealized gains and losses of the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Company's available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a component of "Other comprehensive income (loss)."

                Investments with original maturities greater than 90 days and remaining maturities of less than one year are normally classified within "Short-term investments."Other current assets." In addition, investments with maturities beyond one year may be classified within "Short-term investments""Other current assets" if they are highly liquid in nature and represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations.

                The specific identification method is used to determine the cost of securities disposed of, with realized gains and losses reflected in "Interest and other investment income (expense)expense (income), net" in our consolidated statements of operations.

        Cash in Escrow

                As part of the King Acquisition, we were required to deposit $3.56 billion in cash to be held in an escrow account until the earlier of (i)(1) the completion of the King Acquisition, or (ii)(2) the termination of the Transaction Agreement.transaction agreement. The cash was not accessible to the Company for operating cash needs as its use had been administratively restricted for use in the consummation of the King Acquisition. At December 31, 2015, we recorded the balance of the escrow account as a non-current asset, "Cash in escrow," in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Financial Instruments

                The carrying amounts of "Cash and cash equivalents," "Accounts receivable, net of allowances," "Accounts payable," and "Accrued expenses"expenses and other liabilities" approximate fair value due to the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        short-term nature of these accounts. Our investments in U.S. treasuries, government agency securities, and corporate bonds, if any, are carried at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices for such securities, if available, or is estimated on the basis of quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics.

                The Company transacts business in various foreign currencies and has significant international sales and expenses denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting us to foreign currency risk. To mitigate our foreign currency risk resulting from our foreign currency-denominated monetary assets, liabilities and earnings and our foreign currency risk related to functional currency-equivalent cash flows resulting from our intercompany transactions, we periodically enter into currency derivative contracts, principally forward contracts. These forward contracts generally have a maturity of less than one year. The counterparties for our currency derivative contracts are large and reputable commercial or investment banks.

                We assess the nature of these derivatives under Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815 to determine whether such derivatives should be designated as hedging instruments. The fair value of foreign currency contracts are estimated based on the prevailing exchange rates of the various hedged currencies as of the end of the period. We report the fair value of these contracts within "Other current assets," "Accrued expense and other liabilities," "Other assets," or "Other liabilities," as applicable, in our Consolidated Balance Sheetsconsolidated balance sheets based on the prevailing exchange rates of the various hedged currencies as of the end of the relevant period.

                We do not hold or purchase any foreign currency forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

                For foreign currency forward contracts entered into to mitigate risk from foreign currency-denominated monetary assets, liabilities, and earnings thatwhich are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815, changes in the estimated fair value of these derivatives are recorded within "General and administrative expenses" and "Interest and other expense, net" in our Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Operations,operations, consistent with the nature of the underlying transactions.

                For foreign currency forward contracts that we entered into to hedge forecasted intercompany cash flows that are subject to foreign currency risk and which have been designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with ASC 815, we assess the effectiveness of these cash flow hedges at inception and on an ongoing basis and determine if the hedges are effective at providing offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. The Company records the effective portion of changes in the estimated fair value of these derivatives in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)"loss" and subsequently reclassifies the related amount of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings within "General and administrative expenses"administrative" or "Net revenues" when the hedged item impacts earnings. The Company measuresearnings, consistent with the nature and timing of the underlying transactions. Cash flows from these foreign currency forward contracts are classified in the same category as the cash flows associated with the hedged item in the consolidated statements of cash flows. We measure hedge ineffectiveness, if any, and if it is determined that a derivative has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge accounting for the derivative.

        Concentration of Credit Risk

                Our concentration of credit risk relates to depositors holding the Company's cash and cash equivalents and customers with significant accounts receivable balances.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

                Our cash and cash equivalents are invested primarily in money market funds consisting of short-term, high-quality debt instruments issued by governments and governmental organizations, financial institutions and industrial companies.

                Our customer base includes retailers and distributors, including mass-market retailers, first party digital storefronts, consumer electronics stores, discount warehouses, and game specialty stores in the U.S. and other countries worldwide. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain allowances for potential credit losses. We generally do not require collateral or other security from our customers. We

                For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had three customers—Apple, Sony Interactive Entertainment, Inc. ("Sony"), and Google—who accounted for 16%, 14%, and 10%, respectively, of net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had two customers, customers—Sony and Apple—who each accounted for 13% of net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had two customers—Sony and Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft")—who accounted for 12% and 10%, respectively, of net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015. We did not have any single customer that accounted for 10% or more of net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013.revenues.

                We had three customers, customers—Sony, Microsoft, and Wal-Mart, Apple—who accounted for 18%17%, 13%14%, and 11%10%, respectively, of consolidated gross receivables at December 31, 2015, respectively,2017. We had three customers—Sony, Microsoft, and 13%,Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.—who accounted for 17%, 10%, and 11%10%, respectively, of consolidated gross receivables at December 31, 2014, respectively.2016.

        Software Development Costs and Intellectual Property Licenses

                Software development costs include payments made to independent software developers under development agreements, as well as direct costs incurred for internally developed products. Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is established and such costs are determined to be recoverable. Technological feasibility of a product encompassesrequires both technical design documentation and game design documentation, or the completed and tested product design and a working model. Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in the assessment of when technological feasibility is established.established and the evaluation is performed on a product-by-product basis. For products where proven technology exists, this may occur early in the development cycle. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Software development costs related to online hosted service revenue arrangements


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        are capitalized after the preliminary project phase is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Prior to a product's release, if and when we believe capitalized costs are not recoverable, we expense the amounts as part of "Cost of sales—revenues—software royalties, amortization, and amortization.intellectual property licenses." Capitalized costs for products that are canceled or are expected to be abandoned are charged to "Product development expense"development" in the period of cancellation. Amounts related to software development which are not capitalized are charged immediately to "Product development expense.development."

                Commencing upon a product's release, capitalized software development costs are amortized to "Cost of sales—revenues—software royalties, amortization, and amortization"intellectual property licenses" based on the ratio of current revenues to total projected revenues for the specific product, generally resulting in an amortization period of six months or less, or over the estimated useful life, generallyto approximately one to two years.

                Intellectual property license costs represent license fees paid to intellectual property rights holders for use of their trademarks, copyrights, software, technology, music or other intellectual property or proprietary rights in the development of our products. Depending upon the agreement with the rights


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        holder, we may obtain the right to use the intellectual property in multiple products over a number of years, or alternatively, for a single product. Prior to a product's release, if and when we believe capitalized costs are not recoverable, we expense the amounts as part of "Cost of sales—revenues—software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses." Capitalized intellectual property costs for products that are canceled or are expected to be abandoned are charged to "Product development expense"development" in the period of cancellation.

                Commencing upon a product's release, capitalized intellectual property license costs are amortized to "Cost of sales—revenues—software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses" based on the ratio of current revenues for the specific product to total projected revenues for all products in which the licensed property will be utilized. As intellectual property license contracts may extend for multiple years and can be used in multiple products to be released over a period beyond one year, the amortization of capitalized intellectual property license costs relating to such contracts may extend beyond one year.

                We evaluate the future recoverability of capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses on a quarterly basis. For products that have been released in prior periods, the primary evaluation criterion is the actual performance of the title performance.to which the costs relate. For products that are scheduled to be released in future periods, recoverability is evaluated based on the expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate or in which the licensed trademark or copyright is to be used. Criteria used to evaluate expected product performance include: historical performance of comparable products developed with comparable technology; market performance of comparable titles; orders for the product prior to its release; general market conditions; and, for any sequel product, estimated performance based on the performance of the product on which the sequel is based. Further, as many of our capitalized intellectual property licenses extend for multiple products over multiple years, we also assess the recoverability of capitalized intellectual property license costs based on certain qualitative factors, such as the success of other products and/or entertainment vehicles utilizing the intellectual property, whether there are any future planned theatrical releases or television series based on the intellectual property, and the rights holder's continued promotion and exploitation of the intellectual property.

                Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in assessing the recoverability of capitalized costs. In evaluating the recoverability of capitalized costs, the assessment of expected product performance utilizes forecasted sales amounts and estimates of additional costs to be incurred.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        If revised forecasted or actual product sales are less than the originally forecasted amounts utilized in the initial recoverability analysis, the net realizable value may be lower than originally estimated in any given quarter, which could result in an impairment charge. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of expenses for any period if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimatesmatters resolve in evaluating these qualitative factors.a manner that is inconsistent with management's expectations.

        Inventories

                Inventories consist of materials (including manufacturing royalties paid to console manufacturers), labor, and freight-in and are stated at the lower of cost (weighted-average method) or net realizable value. Inventories are relieved on a weighted-average cost method.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Allowance for Inventory Obsolescence

                We regularly review inventory quantities on-hand and in the retail channels. We write down inventory based on excess or obsolete inventories determined primarily by future anticipated demand for our products. Inventory write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and net realizable value, based upon assumptions about future demand, which are inherently difficult to assess and dependent on market conditions. At the point of a loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established basis.

        Long-Lived Assets

                Property and Equipment.    Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life (i.e.(i.e., 25 to 33 years for buildings, and 2 to 5 years for computer equipment, office furniture and other equipment) of the asset. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation thereon are removed and any resulting gains or losses are included in the consolidated statements of operations. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated life of the asset, not to exceed the length of the lease. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

                Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Assets.    We account for goodwill in accordance with ASC Topic 350. Under ASC Topic 350, goodwill is considered to have an indefinite life, and is carried at cost. Acquired trade names are assessed as indefinite lived assets if there is no foreseeable limits on the periods of time over which they are expected to contribute cash flows. Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are not amortized, but are subject to an annual impairment test, as well as between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We perform our annual impairment testing at December 31st.31.

                Our annual goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. We have determined our reporting units based on the guidance within ASC Subtopic 350-20. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, our reporting units are the same as our operating segments. We test goodwill for possible impairment by first determining the fair value of the related reporting unit and comparing this value to the recorded net assets of the reporting unit, including goodwill. The fair value of our reporting units is determined using an income approach based on discounted cash flow models. In the event the recorded net assets of the reporting unit exceed the estimated fair value of such assets, we perform a second step to measure the amount of the impairment, which is equal to the amount by which the recorded goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill after assessing the fair value of each of the assets and liabilities within the reporting unit. We have determined that no impairment has occurred at December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 based upon a set of assumptions regarding discounted future cash flows, which represent our best estimate of future performance at this time.

                We test indefinite livedindefinite-lived acquired trade names for possible impairment by using a discounted cash flow model to estimate fair value. We have determined that no impairment has occurred at December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 based upon a set of assumptions regarding discounted future cash flows, which represent our best estimate of future performance at this time.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

                Changes in our assumptions underlying our estimates of fair value, which will be a function of our future financial performance and changes in economic conditions, could result in future impairment charges.

                Amortizable Intangible and Other Long-lived Assets.    Intangible assets subject to amortization are carried at cost less accumulated amortization, and amortized over the estimated useful life in proportion to the economic benefits received.

                Management evaluatesWe evaluate the recoverability of our identifiabledefinite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Subtopic 360-10, which generally requires the assessment of these assets for recoverability when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment exists. We considered certain events and circumstances in determining whether the carrying value of identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets, other than indefinite-lived intangible assets, may not be recoverable including, but not limited to: significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results; significant changes in the use of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends; a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time; and changes in our business strategy. If we determine that the carrying value may not be recoverable, we estimate the undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use and ultimate disposition of these assetsthe asset group to determine whether an impairment exists. If an impairment is indicated based on a comparison of the assets'asset groups' carrying values and the undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. We did not record an impairment charge to our definite-lived intangible assets exceeds the fair valueas of the assets. We have determined that there are no events or circumstances that indicate a potential impairment exists at December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013.2015.

        Revenue Recognition

                We recognize revenues when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product or service has been provided to the customer, the collection of our fees is reasonably assured and the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable. Certain products are sold to customers with a "street date" (which is the earliest date these products may be sold by retailers). For these products, we recognize revenues on the later of the street date or the date the product is sold to the customer. Revenues are recorded net of taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are both imposed on and concurrent with the specific revenue-producing transaction between us and our customer, such as sales and value-added taxes.

          Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables

                Certain of our revenue arrangements have multiple deliverables, which we account for in accordance with ASC Topic 605 and Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-13.605. These revenue arrangements include product sales consisting of both software, service (such as ongoing hosting arrangements), and hardware deliverables (such as peripherals or other ancillary collectors' items sold together with physical "boxed" software) and our sales ofWorld of Warcraft boxed products, expansion packs and value-added services, each of which is considered with the related subscription services for these purposes..

                Under ASC Topic 605 and ASU 2009-13, whenWhen a revenue arrangement contains multiple elements, such as hardware and software products, licenses and/or services, we allocate revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor-specific-objective-evidencevendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") if it is available, third-party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available,


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        or best estimated selling price ("BESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In multiple element arrangements where more-than-incidental software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. IfFurther, if the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable, the arrangement consideration allocated to the software deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue.

                As noted above, when neither VSOE nor TPE is available for a deliverable, we use BESP. We did not have significant revenue arrangements that requirerequired using BESP for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013.2015. The inputs we use to determine the selling price of our significant deliverables include the actual price charged by the Company for a deliverabledeliverables that the Company sells separately which(which represents the VSOE,VSOE) and the wholesale prices of the same or similar products whichfor deliverables not sold separately (which represents TPE.TPE).

          Product Sales

                Product sales representconsist of sales of our games, including physical products and digital full-game downloads. We recognize revenues from the sale of our products upon the transfer ofafter both (1) title and risk of loss have been transferred to our customers and once(2) all performance obligations have been completed. With respect to digital full-game downloads, we recognize revenuesthis is when the product is available for download or is activated for gameplay. Revenues from product sales are recognized after deducting the estimated allowance for returns and price protection. Sales incentives and other consideration given by us to our customers, such as rebates and product placement fees, are considered adjustments of the selling price of our products and are reflected as reductions to revenues. Sales incentives and other consideration that represent costs incurred by us for assets or services received, such as the appearance of our products in a customer's national circular ad, are reflected as sales and marketing expenses when the benefit from the sales incentive is separable from sales to the same customer and we can reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit.

          Products with Online Functionality or Online Hosted Service Arrangements

                For our software products with online functionality or that are part of aan online hosted service arrangement, we evaluate whether that online functionality constitutes a more-than-inconsequential separate deliverable in addition to the software product. This evaluation is performed for each software product or product add-on (including digital downloadable content), when it is released. Determining whether the online functionality for a particular gameproduct constitutes a more-than-inconsequential deliverable is subjective and requires management's judgment. When we determine that the online functionality constitutes a more-than-inconsequential separate service deliverable in addition to the product, which is principally because of the online functionality's importance to gameplay, we consider our performance obligation for this title to extend beyond the sale of the game. In addition, VSOE of fair value does not exist for the online functionality of some products, as we do not separately charge for this component of every title.component. As a result, we initially defer all of the software-related revenues from the sale of any such title (including digital downloadable content) and recognize the revenues ratably over the estimated service period of the title.period. In addition, we initially defer the costscost of salesrevenues for the title and recognize the costs of sales as the related revenues are recognized. The costscost of salesrevenues that are initially deferred include manufacturingproduct and distribution costs, software royalties and amortization, and intellectual property licenses and exclude intangible asset amortization.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

                For our software products with online functionality that we consider to be incidental to the overall product offering and are inconsequential deliverables, we recognize the related revenues when the revenue recognition criteria described above have been met.

                For ourWorld of Warcraft boxed products, expansion packs and value-added services, we recognize revenues in each case with the related subscription service revenues ratably over the estimated service period, beginning upon the activation of the software and delivery of the related services. Revenues attributed to the sale ofWorld of Warcraft boxed software and related expansion packs are classified as "Product sales," whereas revenues attributable to subscriptions and other value-added services are classified as "Subscription, licensing, and other revenues."

          Subscription Revenues

                Subscription revenues are mostly derived fromWorld of Warcraft.World of Warcraft is a game that is playable through Blizzard's servers and is generally sold on a subscription-only basis.

                ForWorld of Warcraft, after the first month of free usage that is included with theWorld of Warcraft boxed software, theWorld of Warcraft end user may enter into a subscription agreement for additional future access. Revenues associated with the sales of subscriptions via boxed software and prepaid subscription cards, as well as prepaid subscriptions sales, are deferred until the subscription service is activated by the consumer and are then recognized ratably over the subscription period. Value-added service revenues associated with subscriptions are recognized ratably over the estimated service periods.

          Licensing Revenues

                Third-partyIn certain countries, we utilize third-party licensees in Russia, China and Taiwanto distribute and host certain Blizzardour games in their respective countries underaccordance with license agreements, for which theythe licensees pay the Company a royalty. We recognize these royalties as revenues based on the end users' activation of the underlying prepaid time, if all other performance obligations have been completed, or based on usage by the end user and over the estimated service period when we have continuing service obligations. We recognize any upfront licensing fees received over the term of the contracts.agreements.

                With respect to license agreements that provide customers the right to make multiple copies in exchange for guaranteed amounts, revenues are generally recognized upon delivery of a master copy.copy if all other performance obligations have been completed or over the estimated service period when we have continuing service obligations. Per copy royalties on sales that exceed the guarantee are recognized as earned. In addition, persuasive evidence of an arrangement must exist and collection of the related receivable must be probable.

          Other Revenues

                Other revenues primarily include revenues from digital downloadable content (e.g., multi-player content packs), microtransactions and the licensing of intellectual property other than software to third-parties.

                Microtransaction revenues are derived from the sale of virtual goods and currencies to our players to enhance their gameplay experience. Proceeds from the sales of virtual goods and currencies are initially recorded in deferred revenues. Proceeds from the sales of virtual currencies are recognized as revenues when a player uses the virtual goods purchased with the virtual currency. Proceeds from the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        sales of virtual goods directly are also recognized as revenues when a player uses the virtual goods. We categorize our virtual goods as either consumable or durable. Consumable virtual goods represent goods that can be consumed by a specific player action; accordingly, we recognize revenues from the sale of consumable virtual goods as the goods are consumed. Durable virtual goods represent


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        goods that are accessible to the player over an extended period of time. Wetime; accordingly, we recognize revenues from the sale of durable virtual goods ratably over the period of time the goods are available to the player, which is generally the estimated service period of the game.period.

                Revenues from the licensing of intellectual property other than software to third-parties are recorded upon the receipt of licensee statements, or upon the receipt of cash, provided the license period has begun and all performance obligations have been completed.

          Estimated Service Period

                We determine the estimated service period for players of our games with consideration of various data points, including the weighted average number of days between players' first and last days played online, the average total hours played, the average number of days in which player activity stabilizes, and the weighted-average number of days between players' first purchase date and last date played online. We also consider known online trends, and the service periods of our previously released games, and disclosedthe service periods forof our competitors' games that are similar in nature.nature to ours, to the extent they are publicly available. Determining the estimated service period is subjective and requires management's judgment. Future usage patterns may differ from historical usage patterns and therefore the estimated service period may change in the future. The estimated service periods for players of our current games isare generally less than 12 months.

          Principal Agent Considerations

                We evaluate sales of our products and content via third party digital storefronts, such as Microsoft's Xbox Games Store, Sony's PSN, the Apple App Store, and the Google Play Store, to determine whether revenues should be reported gross or net of fees retained by the storefront. Key indicators that we evaluate in determining gross versus net treatment include but are not limited to the following:

          the party responsible for delivery/fulfillment of the product or service to the consumer;

          the party responsible for consumer billing, fee collection, and refunds;

          the storefront and terms of sale that govern the consumer's purchase of the product or service; and

          the party that sets the pricing with the consumer and has credit risk.

                Based on evaluation of the above indicators, we report revenues on a gross basis for sales arrangements via Apple App Store and Google Play Store, and we report revenues on a net basis (i.e. net of fees retained by the storefront) for sales arrangements via Microsoft's Xbox Games Store and Sony PSN.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Allowances for Returns, Price Protection, and Doubtful Accounts and Inventory Obsolescence

                We closely monitor and analyze the historical performance of our various titles, the performance of products released by other publishers, market conditions, and the anticipated timing of other releases to assess future demand of current and upcoming titles. Initial volumes shipped upon title launch and subsequent reorders are evaluated with the goal of ensuring that quantities are sufficient to meet the demand from the retail markets, but at the same time are controlled to prevent excess inventory in the channel. We benchmark units to be shipped to our customers using historical and industry data.

                We may permit product returns from, or grant price protection to, our customers under certain conditions. In general, price protection refers to the circumstances in which we elect to decrease, on a short- or longer-term basis, the wholesale price of a product by a certain amount and, when granted and applicable, allow customers a credit against amounts owed by such customers to us with respect to open and/or future invoices. The conditions our customers must meet to be granted the right to return products or receive price protection credits include, among other things, compliance with applicable trading and payment terms achievement of sell-through performance targets in certain instances, and consistent return of inventory and delivery of sell-through reports to us. We may also consider other factors, including achievement of sell-through performance targets in certain instances, the facilitation of slow-moving inventory, and other market factors.

                Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the allowance for returns and price protection in any accounting period based on estimates ofrespect to potential future product returns and price protection related to current period product revenues.revenues must be made and used when establishing the allowance for returns and price protection in any accounting period. We estimate the amount of future returns and price protection for current period product revenues utilizing historical experience and information regarding inventory levels and the demand and acceptance of our products by the end consumer. The following factors are used to estimate the amount of future returns and price protection for a particular title: historical performance of titles in similar genres; historical performance of the hardware platform; historical performance of the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        franchise; console hardware life cycle; sales force and retail customer feedback; industry pricing; future pricing assumptions; weeks of on-hand retail channel inventory; absolute quantity of on-hand retail channel inventory; our warehouse on-hand inventory levels; the title's recent sell-through history (if available); marketing trade programs; and the performance of competing titles. The relative importance of these factors varies among titles depending upon, among other items,things, genre, platform, seasonality, and sales strategy.

                Based upon historical experience, we believe that our estimates are reasonable. However, actual returns and price protection could vary materially from our allowance estimates due to a number of reasons, including, among others: a lack of consumer acceptance of a title, the release in the same period of a similarly themed title by a competitor, or technological obsolescence due to the emergence of new hardware platforms. MaterialThere may be material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenues for any period if factors or market conditions change or if management makes different judgments or utilizes different estimatesmatters resolve in a manner that is inconsistent with management's assumptions utilized in determining the allowances for returns and price protection.

                Similarly, management must make estimates as to the collectability of our accounts receivable. In estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze the age of current outstanding account balances, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, and changes in our customers' payment terms and their economic condition, as well as whether


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        we can obtain sufficient credit insurance. Any significant changes in any of these criteria would affect management's estimates in establishing our allowance for doubtful accounts.

                We regularly review inventory quantities on-hand and in the retail channels. We write down inventory based on excess or obsolete inventories determined primarily by future anticipated demand for our products. Inventory write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and net realizable value, based upon assumptions about future demand, which are inherently difficult to assess and dependent on market conditions. At the point of a loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established basis.

        Shipping and Handling

                Shipping and handling costs, which consist primarily of packaging and transportation charges incurred to move finished goods to customers, are included in "Cost of sales—revenues—product costs."

        Cost of Revenues

                Our cost of revenues consist of the following:

        Cost of revenues—product sales:

          (1)
          "Product costs"—includes the manufacturing costs of goods produced and sold. These generally include product costs, manufacturing royalties, net of volume discounts, personnel-related costs, warehousing, and distribution costs. We generally recognize volume discounts when they are earned (typically in connection with the achievement of unit-based milestones).

          (2)
          "Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses"—includes the amortization of capitalized software costs and royalties attributable to product sales revenues. These are costs capitalized on the balance sheet until the respective games are released, at which time the capitalized costs are amortized. Also included is amortization of intangible assets recognized in purchase accounting attributable to product sales revenues.

        Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues:

          (1)
          "Game operations and distribution costs"—includes costs to operate our games, such as customer service, internet bandwidth and server costs, platform provider fee, and payment provider fees.

          (2)
          "Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses"—includes the amortization of capitalized software costs and royalties attributable to subscription, licensing and other revenues. These are costs capitalized on the balance sheet until the respective games are released, at which time the capitalized costs are amortized. Also included is amortization of intangible assets recognized in purchase accounting attributable to subscription, licensing and other revenues.

        Advertising Expenses

                We expense advertising as incurred, except for production costs associated with media advertising, which are deferred and charged to expense when the related advertisement is run for the first time. Advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 2014, and 2013 were $523$708 million, $495$641 million, and $401$523 million, respectively, and are included in "Sales and marketing expense"marketing" in the consolidated statements of operations.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Income Taxes

                We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which thethose temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities ofdue to a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We evaluate deferred tax assets each period for recoverability. For those assets that do not meet the threshold of "more likely than not" that they will be realized in the future, a valuation allowance is recorded.

                We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in "Income tax expense."

                On December 22, 2017, tax reform legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "U.S. Tax Reform Act") was enacted in the United States. The U.S. Tax Reform Act, among other things, reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018 and implemented a modified territorial tax system that imposes a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries ("Transition Tax").

                On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on how to account for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act under ASC 740. SAB 118 enables companies to record a provisional amount for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act based on a reasonable estimate, subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year, until accounting is complete.

                We continue to analyze the prospective effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, including new provisions impacting certain foreign income, such as global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") of foreign subsidiaries, base erosion anti-abuse tax ("BEAT"), and foreign-derived intangible income ("FDII"), potential limitations on interest expense deductions, and changes to the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, among other provisions of the U.S. Tax Reform Act. The Company has elected to account for the U.S. Tax Reform Act provisions related to GILTI as period costs if and when incurred pursuant to the FASB Staff Q&A guidance issued in January 2018.

                In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance to simplify accounting for share-based payments. The new standard, amongst other things:

          requires that all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recorded as an income tax expense or benefit in the consolidated statement of operations and that the tax effects of exercised or vested awards be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur;

          requires excess tax benefits from share-based payments to be reported as operating activities on the statement of cash flows; and

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

          permits an accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate, as currently required, or account for forfeitures when they occur.

                We elected to early adopt this new standard in the third quarter of 2016, which required us to reflect any adjustments as of January 1, 2016. As part of the adoption, we made certain elections, including the following:

          to apply the presentation requirements for our consolidated statement of cash flows related to excess tax benefits retrospectively to all periods presented; and

          to continue to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate.

                As a result of the adoption, we recognized excess tax benefits of $113 million and $81 million as a reduction to income tax expense in our consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For periods prior to 2016, such excess tax benefits were recorded to shareholders equity.

        Foreign Currency Translation

                All assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries who have a functional currency other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected as a component of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)"loss" in shareholders' equity.

        Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

                "Basic (loss) earnings (loss) per common share" is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented. "Diluted earnings (loss) per common share" is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, increased by the weighted-average number of common stock equivalents. Common stock equivalents are calculated using the treasury stock method and represent incremental shares issuable upon exercise of our outstanding options. However, potential common shares are not included in the denominator of the diluted earnings (loss) per common share calculation when inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive, such as in a period in which a net loss is recorded.

                When we determine whether instruments granted in stock-basedshare-based payment transactions are participating securities, unvested stock-basedshare-based awards which include the right to receive non-forfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents are considered to participate with common stock in undistributed earnings. With participating securities, we are required to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share amounts under the two-class method. The two-class method excludes from the earnings (loss) per common share calculation any dividends paid or owed to participating securities and any undistributed earnings considered to be attributable to participating securities.

        Stock-Based Compensation

                We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718-10,Compensation-Stock Compensation, and ASC Subtopic 505-50,Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized during the requisite service period (that is, the period for which the employee is being compensated) and is based on the value of stock-based payment awards after a reduction for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Share-Based Payments

                We account for share-based payments in accordance with ASC Subtopic 718-10 and ASC Subtopic 505-50. Share-based compensation expense for a given grant is recognized over the requisite service period (that is, the period for which the employee is being compensated) and is based on the value of share-based payment awards after a reduction for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

                We generally estimate the value of stock-based payment awards on the measurement datestock options using a binomial-lattice model. Our determination of fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing modelThis estimate is affected by our stock price, as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables, include, but are not limited to,including our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.

                We generally determine the fair value of restricted stock rights (including restricted stock units restricted stock awards and performance shares) based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.grant, reduced by the present value of the estimated future dividends during the vesting period in which the restricted stock units holder will not participate. Certain restricted stock rightsunits granted to our employees and senior management vest based on the achievement of pre-established performance or market conditions. We estimate the fair value ofFor performance-based restricted stock rights at the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Eachunits, each quarter we update our assessment of the probability that the specified performance criteria will be achieved. We amortize the fair values of performance-based restricted stock rightsunits over the requisite service period, adjustedadjusting for estimated forfeitures for each separately vesting tranche of the award. WeFor market-based restricted stock units, we estimate the fair value of market-based restricted stock rights at the date of grant using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology and amortize those fair values over the requisite service period, adjustedadjusting for estimated forfeitures for each separately vesting tranche of the award. The Monte Carlo methodology that we use to estimate the fair value of market-based restricted stock rightsunits at the date of grant incorporates into the valuation the possibility that the market condition may not be satisfied. Provided that the requisite service is rendered, the total fair value of the market-based restricted stock rightsunits at the date of grant must be recognized as compensation expense even if the market condition is not achieved. However, the number of shares that ultimately vest can vary significantly with the performance of the specified market criteria.

        3. Cash        For share-based compensation grants that are liability classified, we update our grant date valuation at each reporting period and Cash Equivalentsrecognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment for changes in the value related to the requisite service already rendered.

        Loss Contingencies

                The following table summarizesASC Topic 450 governs the componentsdisclosure of our cashloss contingencies and cash equivalents with original maturitiesaccrual of three months or less atloss contingencies in respect of litigation and other claims. We record an accrual for a potential loss when it is probable that a loss will occur and the dateamount of purchase (amounts in millions):the loss can be reasonably estimated. When the reasonable estimate of the potential loss is within a range of amounts, the minimum of the range of potential loss is accrued, unless a higher amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range. Moreover, even if an accrual is not required, we provide additional disclosure related to litigation and other claims when it is reasonably possible (i.e., more than remote) that the outcomes of such litigation and other claims include potential material adverse impacts on us.

         
         At December 31, 
         
         2015 2014 

        Cash

         $176 $333 

        Foreign government treasury bills

          34  40 

        Money market funds

          1,613  4,475 

        Cash and cash equivalents

         $1,823 $4,848 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        3. Cash and Cash Equivalents

                The following table summarizes the components of our cash and cash equivalents (amounts in millions):

         
         At December 31, 
         
         2017 2016 

        Cash

         $269 $286 

        Foreign government treasury bills

          39  38 

        Money market funds

          4,405  2,921 

        Cash and cash equivalents

         $4,713 $3,245 

        4. Inventories, Net

                Our inventories, net consist of the following (amounts in millions):


         At
        December 31,
          At
        December 31,
         

         2015 2014  2017 2016 

        Finished goods

         $101 $112  $45 $40 

        Purchased parts and components

         27 11  1 9 

        Inventories, net

         $128 $123  $46 $49 

                InventoryAt December 31, 2017 and 2016, inventory reserves were $54$36 million and $52$45 million, at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

        5. Software Development and Intellectual Property Licenses

                The following table summarizes the components of our capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses (amounts in millions):


         At
        December 31,
        2015
         At
        December 31,
        2014
          At
        December 31,
         

        Internally developed software costs

         $266 $262 

         2017 2016 

        Internally-developed software costs

         $270 $277 

        Payments made to third-party software developers

         150 210  183 189 

        Total software development costs

         $416 $472  $453 $466 

        Intellectual property licenses

         $30 $23 

                As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, capitalized intellectual property licenses were not material.

                Amortization write-offsof capitalized software development costs and intellectual property was the following (amounts in millions):

         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Amortization of capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses

         $314 $335 $410 

                Write-offs and impairments of capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses are comprised ofwere not material for the following (amounts in millions):years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.

         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2015 2014 2013 

        Amortization of capitalized software development costs and intellectual property licenses

         $410 $272 $195 

        Write-offs and impairments

          4    29 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        6. Property and Equipment, Net

                Property and equipment, net was comprised of the following (amounts in millions):


         At December 31,  At December 31, 

         2015 2014  2017 2016 

        Land

         $1 $1  $1 $1 

        Buildings

         4 4  4 4 

        Leasehold improvements

         109 104  224 162 

        Computer equipment

         431 347  658 560 

        Office furniture and other equipment

         52 45  92 78 

        Total cost of property and equipment

         597 501  979 805 

        Less accumulated depreciation

         (408) (344) (685) (547)

        Property and equipment, net

         $189 $157  $294 $258 

                Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 2014, and 2013 was $82$130 million, $76$121 million, and $84$82 million, respectively.

                Rental expense was $39$71 million, $38$65 million and $35$39 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively.

        7. Intangible Assets, Net

                Intangible assets, net consist of the following (amounts in millions):


         At December 31, 2015  At December 31, 2017 

         Estimated
        useful
        lives
         Gross
        carrying
        amount
         Accumulated
        amortization
         Net
        carrying
        amount
          Estimated
        useful
        lives
         Gross
        carrying
        amount
         Accumulated
        amortization
         Net
        carrying
        amount
         

        Acquired definite-lived intangible assets:

                      

        License agreements and other

         1 - 10 years $116 $(93)$23 

        Internally-developed franchises

         11 years 309 (298) 11  3 - 11 years $1,154 $(869)$285 

        Developed software

         5 years 15  15  2 - 5 years 601 (301) 300 

        Customer base

         2 years 617 (573) 44 

        Trade names

         7 - 10 years 54 (16) 38 

        Other

         1 - 15 years 19 (13) 6 

        Total definite-lived intangible assets

         $440 $(391)$49  $2,445 $(1,772)$673 

        Acquired indefinite-lived intangible assets:

                      

        Activision trademark

         Indefinite     386  Indefinite     386 

        Acquired trade names

         Indefinite     47  Indefinite     47 

        Total indefinite-lived intangible assets

             $433      $433 

        Total intangible assets, net

             $1,106 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        7. Intangible Assets, Net (Continued)



         At December 31, 2014  At December 31, 2016 

         Estimated
        useful
        lives
         Gross
        carrying
        amount
         Accumulated
        amortization
         Net
        carrying
        amount
          Estimated
        useful
        lives
         Gross
        carrying
        amount
         Accumulated
        amortization
         Net
        carrying
        amount
         

        Acquired definite-lived intangible assets:

                      

        License agreements and other

         3 - 10 years $98 $(92)$6 

        Internally-developed franchises

         11 years 309 (286) 23  3 - 11 years 1,154 (583) 571 

        Developed software

         3 - 5 years 595 (145) 450 

        Customer base

         2 years 617 (266) 351 

        Trade names

         7 - 10 years 54 (8) 46 

        Other

         1 - 8 years 18 (11) 7 

        Total definite-lived intangible assets

         $407 $(378)$29  $2,438 $(1,013)$1,425 

        Acquired indefinite-lived intangible assets:

                      

        Activision trademark

         Indefinite     386  Indefinite     386 

        Acquired trade names

         Indefinite     47  Indefinite     47 

        Total indefinite-lived intangible assets

             $433      $433 

        Total intangible assets, net

             $1,858 

                Amortization expense of intangible assets was $13$759 million, $13$708 million, and $24$13 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively.

                At December 31, 2015,2017, future amortization of definite-lived intangible assets is estimated as follows (amounts in millions):

        2016

         $17 

        2017

         12 

        2018

         7  $369 

        2019

         5  209 

        2020

         4  72 

        2021

         12 

        2022

         7 

        Thereafter

         4  4 

        Total

         $49  $673 

                We did not record any impairment charges against our intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016, and 2013.2015.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        8. Goodwill

                The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (amounts in millions):


         Activision Blizzard Other Total  Activision Blizzard(1) King Total 

        Balance at December 31, 2013

         $6,914 $178 $ $7,092 

        Tax benefit credited to goodwill

         (5)   (5)

        Foreign exchange

         (1)   (1)

        Balance at December 31, 2015

         $6,905 $190 $ $7,095 

        Additions through acquisition

           2,675 2,675 

        Other

         (2)   (2)

        Balance at December 31, 2014

         $6,908 $178 $ $7,086 

        Balance at December 31, 2016

         $6,903 $190 $2,675 $9,768 

        Additions through acquisition

           12 12 

        Tax benefit credited to goodwill

         (2)   (2)

        Foreign exchange

         (1)   (1)

        Other

         (5)   (5)

        Balance at December 31, 2015

         $6,905 $178 $12 $7,095 

        Balance at December 31, 2017

         $6,898 $190 $2,675 $9,763 

                The tax benefit credited to goodwill represents the tax deduction resulting from the exercise of stock options that were outstanding and vested at the consummation


        (1)
        As a result of the Business Combination andchange in our operating segments discussed in Note 1, goodwill of $12 million previously reported within the "Other segments" is now included in the purchase price of"Blizzard" reportable segment. The prior period balance has been revised to reflect this change.

                For 2016, the Company, to the extent that the tax deduction did not exceed the fair value of those options. Conversely, to the extent that the tax deduction did exceed the fair value of those options, the tax benefit is credited to additional paid-in capital. The addition to goodwill through acquisition is attributed to the acquisition of the business of Major League Gaming ("MLG")King Acquisition (see Note 23)20).

        At December 31, 20152017, 2016, and 2014,2015, there were no accumulated impairment losses.

        9. Other Current Assets and Current Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

                Included in "Other current assets" of our consolidated balance sheets are deferred cost of sales—product costs of $216 million and $257 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

                Included in "Accrued expenses and other liabilities" of our consolidated balance sheets are accrued payroll-related costs of $246$441 million and $267$393 million at December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

                Included in "Other liabilities" of our consolidated balance sheets are income tax payable of $473 million and $49 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

        10. Fair Value Measurements

                FASB literature regarding fair value measurements for financial and non-financialcertain assets and liabilities establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of "observable inputs" and minimize the use of "unobservable inputs." The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

          Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

          Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and

          Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        10. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

            discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

        Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis

                The table below segregates all of our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date, generally including money market funds, treasury bills, available-for-sale and derivative financial instruments, and other investments (amounts in millions):


          
         Fair Value Measurements at
        December 31, 2015 Using
          
          
         Fair Value Measurements at
        December 31, 2017 Using
          

          
         Quoted
        Prices in
        Active
        Markets for
        Identical
        Assets
          
          
          
          
         Quoted
        Prices in
        Active
        Markets for
        Identical
        Assets
          
          
          

          
         Significant
        Other
        Observable
        Inputs
          
          
          
         Significant
        Other
        Observable
        Inputs
          
          

          
         Significant
        Unobservable
        Inputs
          
          
         Significant
        Unobservable
        Inputs
          

         As of
        December 31,
        2015
         Balance Sheet
        Classification
         As of
        December 31,
        2017
         Balance Sheet
        Classification

         (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

        Financial Assets:

                          

        Recurring fair value measurements:

                          

        Money market funds

         $1,613 $1,613 $ $ Cash and cash equivalents $4,405 $4,405 $ $ Cash and cash equivalents

        Foreign government treasury bills

         34 34   Cash and cash equivalents 39 39   Cash and cash equivalents

        Foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedges

         11  11  Other current assets

        Auction rate securities ("ARS")

         9   9 Long-term investments

        U.S. treasuries and government agency securities

         55 55   Other current assets

        Total recurring fair value measurements

         $1,667 $1,647 $11 $9  $4,499 $4,499 $ $ 

        Financial Liabilities:

                          

        Foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges

         $(4)$ $(4)$ Accrued expenses and other liabilities $(5)$ $(5)$ Accrued expenses and other liabilities

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        10. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)



          
         Fair Value Measurements at
        December 31, 2014 Using
          
          
         Fair Value Measurements at
        December 31, 2016 Using
          

          
         Quoted
        Prices in
        Active
        Markets for
        Identical
        Assets
          
          
          
          
         Quoted
        Prices in
        Active
        Markets for
        Identical
        Assets
          
          
          

          
         Significant
        Other
        Observable
        Inputs
          
          
          
         Significant
        Other
        Observable
        Inputs
          
          

          
         Significant
        Unobservable
        Inputs
          
          
         Significant
        Unobservable
        Inputs
          

         As of
        December 31,
        2014
         Balance Sheet
        Classification
         As of
        December 31,
        2016
         Balance Sheet
        Classification

         (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

        Financial Assets:

                          

        Recurring fair value measurements:

                          

        Money market funds

         $4,475 $4,475 $ $ Cash and cash equivalents $2,921 $2,921 $ $ Cash and cash equivalents

        Foreign government treasury bills

         40 40   Cash and cash equivalents 38 38   Cash and cash equivalents

        ARS

         9   9 Long-term investments

        Foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges

         22  22  Other current assets

        Auction rate securities

         9   9 Other assets

        Total recurring fair value measurements

         $4,524 $4,515 $ $9  $2,990 $2,959 $22 $9 

                ARS represented the only level 3 investment held by the Company. The fair value of these investments has been unchanged for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013.

        Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

        Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Not Designated as Hedges

                At December 31, 2015, the gross notional amount of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedges was approximately $489 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we reclassified $8 million of unrealized gains out of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and into earnings due to dedesignating $250 million notional euro to U.S. dollar cash flow hedges when it was determined the hedged transaction would not occur. As a result of the dedesignation, we entered into offsetting foreign currency forward contracts. The dedesignated and offsetting foreign currency forward contracts remain outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

                The fair value of these foreign currency forward currency contracts was $11 million as of December 31, 2015, and recorded in "Other current assets" in our consolidated balance sheet.

                At December 31, 2014, outstanding foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedges were not material.

                For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, pre-tax net gains associated with these forward contracts were recorded in "General and administrative expenses" and were not material.

        Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Designated as Hedges ("Cash Flow Hedges")

                For foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted intercompany cash flows that are subject to foreign currency risk and which we designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with ASC Topic 815, we assessAt December 31, 2017, the effectivenessgross notional amount of these cash flow hedges at inception and on an


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        10. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

        ongoing basis to determine if the hedges are effective at providing offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. We record the effective portion of changes in the estimatedoutstanding Cash Flow Hedges was approximately $521 million. The fair value of these derivatives in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and subsequently reclassify the related amountcontracts, all of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings within "General and administrative expense" when the hedged item impacts earnings. Cash flows from these foreign currency forward contracts are classified in the same category as the cash flows associated with the hedged item in the consolidated statements of cash flows. We measure hedge ineffectiveness, if any, and if it is determined that a derivative has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, we will discontinue hedge accounting for the derivative.

                The gross notional amount of all outstanding foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges was approximately $381 million at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges. These foreign currency forward contractswhich have remaining maturities of 12 months or less. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, thereless, was no ineffectiveness relating to these hedges. At December 31, 2015, $4$5 million of net unrealized losses. Additionally, at December 31, 2017, we had approximately $10 million of net realized but unrecognized losses related to theserecorded within "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" associated with contracts are expected tothat had settled but were deferred and will be amortized into earnings, along with the associated hedged revenues. Such amounts will be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve12 months.

                At December 31, 2016, the gross notional amount of outstanding Cash Flow Hedges was approximately $346 million. The fair value of these contracts was $22 million of net unrealized gains.

                During the yearyears ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, there was no ineffectiveness relating to our Cash Flow Hedges. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the amount of pre-tax net realized gains of $6 million and $8 million, respectively, associated with these contracts that were reclassified out of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and into "General and administrative expense" due to maturity of these contracts.earnings was not material.

        Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis

                We measure the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis, generally annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        10. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

                For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, there were no impairment charges related to assets that are measured on a non-recurring basis.

        11. Debt

        Credit Facilities

                OnAt December 31, 2016, we had outstanding term loans "A" of approximately $2.7 billion (the "2016 TLA") and $250 million available under a revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") pursuant to a credit agreement executed on October 11, 2013 in connection(as amended thereafter and simultaneously withfrom time to time, the Purchase Transaction,"Credit Agreement").

                On February 3, 2017, we entered into a credit agreementsixth amendment (the "Credit Agreement""Sixth Amendment") to the Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment: (1) provided for a $2.5new tranche of term loans "A" in an aggregate principal amount of $2.55 billion secured term loan facility maturing in October 2020 (the "Term Loan"), and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver""2017 TLA" and, together with the Term Loan,Revolver, the "Credit Facilities"). A portion and (2) released each of our subsidiary guarantors from their respective guarantees provided under the Credit Agreement. All proceeds of the Revolver can be2017 TLA, together with additional cash on hand of $139 million, were used to issue letters of credit of up to $50 million, subject tofully retire the availability2016 TLA, including all accrued and unpaid interest thereon. The terms of the Revolver. To date, we have not drawn2017 TLA, other than the absence of the subsidiary guarantees, are generally the same as the terms of the 2016 TLA. The 2017 TLA will mature on the Revolver.August 23, 2021.

                Borrowings under the Term Loan2017 TLA and the Revolver will bear interest, payable on a quarterly basis, at an annual rate equal to an applicable margin plus,the Company's option, at our option, (A)either (1) a base rate determined by referenceequal to the highest of (a) the interest rate in effect determined by the administrative agent as its "prime rate," (b)(i) the federal funds rate, plus 0.5%, (ii) the prime commercial lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. and (c)(iii) the London InterBankInterbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") for an interest period of one month beginning on such day plus 1.00%, or (B) LIBOR.(2) LIBOR, borrowings under the Term Loanin each case, plus an applicable interest margin. LIBOR will be subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.75%0% and the base rate will be subject to an effective floor of 1.00%. The applicable interest margin for borrowings under the 2017 TLA and Revolver will range from 1.125% to 2.00% for LIBOR borrowings and from 0.125% to 1.00% for base rate borrowings and will be determined by reference to a pricing grid based on the Company's credit ratings. At December 31, 2015,2017, the 2017 TLA bore interest at 2.73%.

                Borrowings under the Revolver may be borrowed, repaid, and re-borrowed by the Company, and are available for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Up to $50 million of the Revolver may be used for letters of credit. To date, we have not drawn on the Revolver.

                During the year ended December 31, 2017, we reduced our total outstanding term loan balances by $1.7 billion. This included $139 million of cash used to retire the 2016 TLA, as discussed above, along with prepayments on the 2017 TLA of $361 million made on February 15, 2017, and $1.2 billion made on May 26, 2017. The May prepayment was made using proceeds from a concurrent issuance of $1.2 billion in notes, as discussed further below. As part of that refinancing, we wrote-off unamortized discount and deferred financing costs of $12 million, which is included in "Loss on extinguishment of debt" in the consolidated statement of operations. The prepayments made on our 2017 TLA have satisfied the remaining required quarterly principal repayments for the entire term of the Credit FacilitiesAgreement. As a result of these prepayments, at December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance of our 2017 TLA was $990 million.

                The Company is subject to a financial covenant requiring the Company's Consolidated Total Net Debt Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) not to exceed 3.50:1.00. The Credit Agreement contains other covenants that are customary for issuers with similar credit ratings. A violation of any of


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        11. Debt (Continued)

        bore interest at 3.25%. In certain circumstances, our applicable interest rate under the Credit Facilities would increase.

                In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal balances under the Credit Facilities, we are required to pay the lenders a commitment fee on unused commitments under the Revolver. Commitment fees are recorded within "Interest and other investment income (expense), net" on the consolidated statement of operations. We are also required to pay customary letter of credit fees, if any, and agency fees.

                The terms of the Credit Agreement required quarterly principal repayments of 0.25% of the Term Loan's original principal amount, with the balance due on the maturity date. On February 11, 2014, we made a voluntary repayment of $375 million on our Term Loan. This repayment satisfied the required quarterly principal repayments for the entire term of the Credit Agreement. On February 11, 2015, we made an additional voluntary repayment of $250 million on our Term Loan.

                The Credit Facilities are guaranteed by certain of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries, whose assets represent approximately 67% of our consolidated assets. The Credit Agreement contains customary covenants that place restrictions in certain circumstances on, among other things, the incurrence of debt, granting of liens, payment of dividends, sales of assets and mergers and acquisitions. If our obligations under the Revolver exceed 15% of the total facility amount as of the end of any fiscal quarter (subject to certain exclusions for letters of credit), we are also subject to certain financial covenants. A violation of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the Credit Agreement. Upon the occurrence of suchan event of default or certain other customary events of default, payment of any outstanding amounts under the Credit Agreement may be accelerated, and the lenders' commitments to extend credit under the Credit Agreement may be terminated. In addition, an event of default under the Credit Agreement could, under certain circumstances, permit the holders of other outstanding unsecured debt, including the debt holders described below, to accelerate the repayment of such obligations. The Company was in compliance with the terms of the Credit Facilities as of December 31, 2015.2017.

                On February 1, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized repayments of up to $1.8 billion of the company's outstanding debt during 2018. As of the date hereof, we have not made any additional repayments on our outstanding debt and the determination as to if and when we make any such repayment will be dependent on market conditions and other factors.

        Amendments to Credit Agreement

                In conjunction with the King Acquisition, the Company entered into three Amendments to the Credit Agreement (the "Amendments"). The Amendments, among other things, provide for incremental term loans in the form of Tranche A Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.3 billion, the proceeds of which were to be issued upon successful closing to fund the King Acquisition. On February 23, 2016, we successfully completed the King Acquisition. Refer to Note 24 for additional information regarding the closing of the King Acquisition and impact on our debt obligations.

        Unsecured Senior Notes

                On September 19, 2013,At December 31, 2016, we issued, at par, $1.5 billion of 5.625%had the following unsecured senior notes due September 2021 (the "2021 Notes") and $750outstanding:

          $750 million of 6.125% unsecured senior notes due September 2023 that we issued on September 19, 2013 (the "2023 Notes" and, together with the 2021 Notes, the "Notes"), in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers made in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.amended (the "Securities Act"); and

          $650 million of 2.3% unsecured senior notes due September 2021 (the "Unregistered 2021 Notes") and $850 million of 3.4% unsecured senior notes due September 2026 (the "Unregistered 2026 Notes") that we issued on September 19, 2016, in a private offering made in accordance with Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act.

                In connection with the issuance of the Unregistered 2021 Notes and the Unregistered 2026 Notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"), among the Company, and the representatives of the initial purchasers of the Unregistered 2021 Notes and the Unregistered 2026 Notes. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, we were required to use commercially reasonable efforts to, within one year of the issue date of the Unregistered 2021 Notes and the Unregistered 2026 Notes, among other things, (1) file a registration statement with respect to an offer to exchange each series of the Unregistered 2021 Notes and the Unregistered 2026 Notes for new notes that were substantially identical in all material respects (except for the provisions relating to the transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) (the "Exchange Offer"), and (2) cause that registration statement (the "Exchange Offer Registration Statement") to be declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act. The Exchange Offer Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on April 28, 2017, and we completed the Exchange Offer on June 1, 2017, such that all the Unregistered 2021 Notes and Unregistered 2026 Notes were exchanged for registered 2021 notes (the "2021 Notes") and registered 2026 notes (the "2026 Notes"), respectively.

                In addition, on May 26, 2017, in a public underwritten offering, we issued $400 million of 2.6% unsecured senior notes due June 2022 (the "2022 Notes"), $400 million of 3.4% unsecured senior notes due June 2027 (the "2027 Notes"), and $400 million of 4.5% unsecured senior notes due June 2047 (the "2047 Notes", and together with the 2021 Notes, the 2022 Notes, the 2023 Notes, the 2026 Notes, and the 2027 Notes, the "Notes"), which were outstanding at December 31, 2017.

                We may redeem the 2023 Notes on or after September 15, 2018, in whole or in part on any one or more occasions, at specified redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we may


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        11. Debt (Continued)

        redeem some or all of the 2023 Notes prior to September 15, 2018, at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus a "make-whole premium" and accrued and unpaid interest. Further, upon the occurrence of one or more qualified equity offerings, we may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes outstanding with the net cash proceeds from such offerings.

                We may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes, the 2022 Notes, the 2026 Notes, the 2027 Notes, and the 2047 Notes prior to August 15, 2021, May 15, 2022, June 15, 2026, March 15, 2027, and December 15, 2046, respectively, and in each case at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus a "make-whole" premium and accrued and unpaid interest. Any redemption of all or a portion of the applicable class of note after the applicable date would be at 100% of aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.

                Upon the occurrence of certain change of control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase the Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These repurchase requirements are considered clearly and closely related to the Notes and are not accounted for separately upon issuance.

                The Notes are general senior obligations of the Company and rankpari passu in right of payment to all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, including the Credit Facilities described above. The Notes are guaranteed on a senior basis by the Guarantors. The Notes and related guarantees are not secured and are effectively subordinated to any of the Company's existing andor future indebtedness that is secured, including the Credit Facilities.secured.

                The 2023 Notes contain customary covenants that place restrictions in certain circumstances on, among other things, the incurrence of debt, granting of liens, payment of dividends, sales of assets, and mergerscertain merger and acquisitions.consolidation transactions. The Notes, with the exception of the 2023 Notes, contain customary covenants that place restrictions in certain circumstances on, among other things, the incurrence of secured debt, entry into sale or leaseback transactions, and certain merger or consolidation transactions. The Company was in compliance with the terms of the Notes as of December 31, 2015.2017.

                Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year. Asyear for the 2021 Notes, the 2023 Notes, and 2026 Notes, and payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of December 31, 2015each year for the 2022 Notes, the 2027 Notes, and 2014, we had2047 Notes. Accrued interest payable of $38 million, related to the Notes,is recorded within "Accrued expenses and other liabilities" in our consolidated balance sheet.

                We may redeem the 2021 Notes on or after September 15,sheets. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had accrued interest payable of $28 million and the 2023 Notes on or after September 15, 2018, in whole or in part on any one or more occasions, at specified redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest. At any time prior to September 15, 2016, with respect to the 2021 Notes, and at any time prior to September 15, 2018, with respect to the 2023 Notes, we may also redeem some or all of the Notes by paying a "make-whole premium", plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the occurrence of one or more qualified equity offerings, we may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the 2021 Notes and 2023 Notes outstanding with the net cash proceeds from such offerings. The Notes are repayable, in whole or in part and at the option of the holders, upon the occurrence of a change in control and a ratings downgrade, at a purchase price equal to 101% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These redemption options are considered clearly and closely$25 million, respectively, related to the NotesNotes.

        Interest expense and are not accounted for separately upon issuance.financing costs

                Fees and discounts associated with the closingissuance of the Term Loan and the Notesour debt instruments are recorded as debt discount, which reduce thereduces their respective carrying value of the Term Loanvalues, and the Notes. The debt discount is amortized over thetheir respective terms of the Term Loan and the Notes.terms. Amortization expense related to the debt discount is recorded within "Interest and other expense (income), net" in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

                In connection with the May 2017 note issuances, we incurred approximately $20 million of discounts and financing costs that were capitalized and recorded within "Long-term debt, net" in our consolidated balance sheet.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        11. Debt (Continued)

                For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015: interest expense was $150 million, $197 million, and $193 million, respectively; amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing costs was $12 million, $20 million, and $7 million, respectively; and commitment fees for the Revolver were not material.

        A summary of our outstanding debt is as follows (amounts in millions):


         December 31, 2015  At December 31, 2017 

         Gross Carrying
        Amount
         Unamortized
        Discount
         Net Carrying
        Amount
          Gross Carrying
        Amount
         Unamortized
        Discount and
        Deferred
        Financing Costs
         Net Carrying
        Amount
         

        Term Loan

         $1,869 $(9)$1,860 

        2017 TLA

         $990 $(8)$982 

        2021 Notes

         1,500 (20) 1,480  650 (4) 646 

        2022 Notes

         400 (4) 396 

        2023 Notes

         750 (11) 739  750 (9) 741 

        2026 Notes

         850 (9) 841 

        2027 Notes

         400 (6) 394 

        2047 Notes

         400 (10) 390 

        Total long-term debt

         $4,119 $(40)$4,079  $4,440 $(50)$4,390 


         
         At December 31, 2016 
         
         Gross Carrying
        Amount
         Unamortized
        Discount and
        Deferred
        Financing Costs
         Net Carrying
        Amount
         

        2016 TLA

         $2,690 $(27)$2,663 

        2021 Notes

          650  (5) 645 

        2023 Notes

          750  (11) 739 

        2026 Notes

          850  (10) 840 

        Total long-term debt

         $4,940 $(53)$4,887 

                As of December 31, 2017 the scheduled maturities and contractual principal repayments of our debt for each of the five succeeding years are as follows (amounts in millions):

        For the year ending December 31,

            

        2018

         $ 

        2019

           

        2020

           

        2021

          1,640 

        2022

          400 

        Thereafter

          2,400 

        Total

         $4,440 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        11. Debt (Continued)

         
         December 31, 2014 
         
         Gross Carrying
        Amount
         Unamortized
        Discount
         Net Carrying
        Amount
         

        Term Loan

         $2,119 $(10)$2,109 

        2021 Notes

          1,500  (23) 1,477 

        2023 Notes

          750  (12) 738 

        Total long-term debt

         $4,369 $(45)$4,324 

                ForWith the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, interest expense was $193 million and $201 million, respectively, amortizationexception of the 2023 Notes and the 2047 Notes, using Level 2 inputs (i.e., observable market prices in less-than-active markets), the carrying values of our debt discount for the Credit Facilities and Notes was $6 million and $6 million, respectively, and commitment fees for the Revolver were not material.

                Asinstruments approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2015, the scheduled maturities and contractual principal repayments of our debt for each of the five succeeding years are as follows (amounts in millions):

        For the year ending December 31,

            

        2016

         $ 

        2017

           

        2018

           

        2019

           

        2020

          1,869 

        Thereafter

          2,250 

        Total

         $4,119 

                As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying value of the Term Loan approximates the fair value, based on Level 2 inputs (observable market prices in less than active markets),2017, as the interest rate is variable over the selected interest period and isrates are similar to current rates at which we can borrow funds. Basedfunds over the selected interest periods. At December 31, 2017, based on Level 2 inputs, the fair values of the 2023 Notes and the 2047 Notes were $795 million and $421 million, respectively.

                At December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the 2016 TLA approximated its fair value, based on Level 2 inputs. At December 31, 2016, based on Level 2 inputs, the fair values of the 2021 Notes, and 2023 Notes, and 2026 Notes were $1,571$635 million, $818 million, and $795$808 million, respectively,respectively.

        12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

                The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 
         
         Foreign currency
        translation
        adjustments
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on available-for-
        sale securities
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on forward
        contracts
         Total 

        Balance at December 31, 2016

         $(659)$1 $29 $(629)

        Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

          20  (1) (45) (26)

        Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings

          16    1  17 

        Balance at December 31, 2017

         $(623)$ $(15)$(638)


         
         For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 
         
         Foreign currency
        translation
        adjustments
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on available-for-
        sale securities
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on forward
        contracts
         Total 

        Balance at December 31, 2015

         $(630)$1 $(4)$(633)

        Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

          (29)   37  8 

        Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings

              (4) (4)

        Balance at December 31, 2016

         $(659)$1 $29 $(629)

                Income taxes were not provided for foreign currency translation items, as these are considered indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries. Due to the U.S. Tax Reform Act, we are re-evaluating our indefinite reinvestment assertions, but we have not yet completed this evaluation. In accordance with SAB 118, we intend to complete this evaluation during the measurement period of December 31, 2015up to one year and $1,586 million and $810 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014.will record adjustments, if any, during those respective periods.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

                The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 2015 and 2014, were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 
         
         Foreign currency
        translation
        adjustments
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on available-for-
        sale securities
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on forward
        contracts
         Total 

        Balance at December 31, 2014

         $(304)$1 $ $(303)

        Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

          (326) 1  10  (315)

        Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

            (1) (14) (15)

        Balance at December 31, 2015

         $(630)$1 $(4)$(633)


         
         For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 
         
         Foreign currency
        translation
        adjustments
         Unrealized gain
        on available-for-
        sale securities
         Unrealized gain
        (loss)
        on forward
        contracts
         Total 

        Balance at December 31, 2013

         $67 $1 $ $68 

        Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

          (371)   8  (363)

        Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

              (8) (8)

        Balance at December 31, 2014

         $(304)$1 $ $(303)

                Income taxes were not provided for foreign currency translation items as these are considered indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.

        13. Operating Segments and Geographic Region

                Currently, we have three reportable segments. Our operating segments are consistent with our internal organizational structure, the manner in which our operations are reviewed and managed by our Chief Executive Officer, who is our Chief Operating Decision Makerchief operating decision maker ("CODM"), the manner in which we assess operating performance and allocate resources, and the availability of separate financial information. Currently, we have two reportable operating segments (see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Previously, we reported "Distribution" as a reportable segment. In the current period, this was no longer deemed a reportable segment and is included in "Other," along with our recently announced Media Networks and Studios businesses. We do not aggregate operating segments.

        The CODM reviews segment performance exclusive ofof: the impact of the change in deferred revenues and related cost of salesrevenues with respect to certain of our online-enabled games, stock-basedgames; share-based compensation expense,expense; amortization of intangible assets as a result of purchase price accounting, andaccounting; fees and other expenses (including legal fees, costs, expenses, and accruals) related to acquisitions, associated integration activities, and the Purchase Transaction.financings; certain restructuring costs; and certain other non-cash charges. The CODM does not review any information regarding total assets on an operating segment basis, and accordingly, no disclosure is made with respect thereto.

                Our operating segments are also consistent with our internal organization structure, the way we assess operating performance and allocate resources, and the availability of separate financial information. We do not aggregate operating segments. As discussed in Note 1, commencing with the second quarter of 2017, we made changes to our operating segments which reflect the changes in our organization and reporting structure. Our MLG business, which was previously included in the non-reportable "Other segments," is now presented within the "Blizzard" reportable segment. Prior period amounts have been revised to reflect this change. The change had no impact on consolidated net revenues or operating income.

                Information on the reportable segments net revenues and segment operating income are presented below (amounts in millions):

         
         Year Ended December 31, 2017 
         
         Activision Blizzard King Total 

        Segment Revenues

                     

        Net revenues from external customers

         $2,628 $2,120 $1,998 $6,746 

        Intersegment net revenues(1)

            19    19 

        Segment net revenues

         $2,628 $2,139 $1,998 $6,765 

        Segment operating income

         $1,005 $712 $700 $2,417 


         
         Year Ended December 31, 2016 
         
         Activision Blizzard King Total 

        Segment Revenues

                     

        Net revenues from external customers

         $2,220 $2,439 $1,586 $6,245 

        Intersegment net revenues(1)

                 

        Segment net revenues

         $2,220 $2,439 $1,586 $6,245 

        Segment operating income

         $788 $995 $537 $2,320 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        13. Operating Segments and Geographic Region (Continued)

        the operating segments

         
         Year Ended December 31, 2015 
         
         Activision Blizzard King Total 

        Segment Revenues

                     

        Net revenues from external customers

         $2,700 $1,565 $ $4,265 

        Intersegment net revenues(1)

                 

        Segment net revenues

         $2,700 $1,565 $ $4,265 

        Segment operating income

         $868 $561 $ $1,429 

        (1)
        Intersegment revenues reflect licensing and reconciliationsservice fees charged between segments.

                Reconciliations of total segment net revenues and total segment operating income to consolidated net revenues from external customers and consolidated income before income tax expense forare presented in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presentedtable below (amounts in millions):


         Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 

         2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

         Net revenues Income from
        operations before income
        tax expense
         

        Activision

         $2,700 $2,686 $2,895 $868 $762 $971 

        Blizzard

         1,565 1,720 1,124 561 756 376 

        Other(1)

         356 407 323 37 9 8 

        Reconciliation to consolidated net revenues:

               

        Segment net revenues

         $6,765 $6,245 $4,265 

        Revenues from other segments(1)

         410 354 356 

        Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues

         (139) 9 43 

        Elimination of intersegment revenues(2)

         (19)   

        Segments total

         4,621 4,813 4,342 1,466 1,527 1,355 

        Reconciliation to consolidated net revenues / consolidated income before income tax expense:

         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Net effect from deferral of net revenues and related cost of sales

         43 (405) 241 (39) (215) 229 

        Stock-based compensation expense

            (92) (104) (110)

        Amortization of intangible assets

            (11) (12) (23)

        Fees and other expenses related to acquisitions and the Purchase Transaction(2)

            (5) (13) (79)

        Consolidated net revenues / operating income

         $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 $1,319 $1,183 $1,372 

        Consolidated net revenues

         $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 

        Interest and other expense, net

               198 202 53 

        Reconciliation to consolidated income before income tax expense:

               

        Segment operating income

         $2,417 $2,320 $1,429 

        Operating (loss) income from other segments(1)

         (19) 14 37 

        Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues and related cost of revenues

         (71) (10) (39)

        Share-based compensation expense

         (178) (159) (92)

        Amortization of intangible assets

         (757) (706) (11)

        Fees and other expenses related to the King Acquisition(3)

         (15) (47) (5)

        Restructuring costs(4)

         (15)   

        Other non-cash charges(5)

         (14)   

        Discrete tax-related items(6)

         (39)   

        Consolidated operating income

         1,309 1,412 1,319 

        Interest and other expense (income), net

         146 214 198 

        Loss on extinguishment of debt

         12 92  

        Consolidated income before income tax expense

               $1,121 $981 $1,319  $1,151 $1,106 $1,121 

        (1)
        Other includesIncludes other income and expenses from operating segments managed outside the reportable segments, including our Media Networks, Studios and Distribution businesses. Other alsoAlso includes unallocated corporate income and expenses.

        (2)
        ReflectsIntersegment revenues reflect licensing and service fees and other expenses related to the Purchase Transaction and the King Acquisition, inclusive of related debt financings.

                Geographic information presented below for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 is based on the location of the selling entity. Net revenues from external customers by geographic region were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         Years ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2015 2014 2013 

        Net revenues by geographic region:

                  

        North America

         $2,409 $2,190 $2,414 

        Europe

          1,741  1,824  1,826 

        Asia Pacific

          514  394  343 

        Total consolidated net revenues

         $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 

                The Company's net revenues in the U.S. were 48%, 48%, and 51% of consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The Company's net revenues in the U.K. were 14%, 16%, and 14% of consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The Company's net revenues in France were 14% and 12% of


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        13. Operating Segments and Geographic Region (Continued)

        consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No other country's net revenues exceeded 10% of consolidated net revenues.

                Net revenues by platform were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2015 2014 2013 

        Net revenues by platform:

                  

        Console

         $2,391 $2,150 $2,379 

        Online(1)

          851  867  912 

        PC

          648  551  340 

        Mobile and ancillary(2)

          418  433  629 

        Total Activision Blizzard net revenues

          4,308  4,001  4,260 

        Other(3)

          356  407  323 

        Total consolidated net revenues

         $4,664 $4,408 $4,583 

        (1)
        Revenues from online consist of revenues from allWorld of Warcraft products, including subscriptions, boxed products, expansion packs, licensing royalties, and value-added services.

        (2)
        Revenues from Mobile and ancillary include revenues from handheld, mobile and tablet devices, as well as non-platform specific game related revenues such as standalone sales of toys and accessories products from the Skylanders franchise and other physical merchandise and accessories.

        (3)
        Net revenues from Other include revenues from our Media Networks and Studios businesses, along with revenues that were historically shown as "Distribution."

                Long-lived assets by geographic region at December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2015 2014 2013 

        Long-lived assets* by geographic region:

                  

        North America

         $138 $122 $102 

        Europe

          42  29  29 

        Asia Pacific

          9  6  7 

        Total long-lived assets by geographic region

         $189 $157 $138 

        *
        The only long-lived assets that we classify by region are our long-term tangible fixed assets, which only include property, plant and equipment assets; all other long-term assets are not allocated by location.charged between segments.

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        13. Operating Segments and Geographic Region (Continued)

        (3)
        Reflects fees and other expenses, such as legal, banking, and professional services fees, related to the King Acquisition and associated integration activities, inclusive of related debt financings.

        (4)
        Reflects restructuring charges, primarily severance costs.

        (5)
        Reflects a non-cash accounting charge to reclassify certain cumulative translation gains (losses) into earnings due to the substantial liquidation of certain of our foreign entities.

        (6)
        Reflects the impact of other unusual or unique tax-related items and activities.

                Net revenues by distribution channels were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         Years Ended December 31, 
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Net revenues by distribution channel:

                  

        Digital online channels(1)

         $5,479 $4,865 $2,502 

        Retail channels

          1,033  1,386  1,806 

        Other(2)

          505  357  356 

        Total consolidated net revenues

         $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 

        (1)
        Include revenues from digitally-distributed subscriptions, licensing royalties, value-added services, downloadable content, microtransactions, and products.

        (2)
        Include revenues from our Studios and Distribution businesses, as well as revenues from MLG and the Overwatch League.

                Geographic information presented below is based on the location of the paying customer. Net revenues by geographic region were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         Years Ended December 31, 
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Net revenues by geographic region:

                  

        Americas

         $3,607 $3,423 $2,409 

        EMEA(1)

          2,464  2,221  1,741 

        Asia Pacific

          946  964  514 

        Total consolidated net revenues

         $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 

        (1)
        Consists of the Europe, Middle East, and Africa geographic regions.

                The Company's net revenues in the U.S. were 45%, 45%, and 48% of consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Company's net revenues in the United Kingdom ("U.K.") were 12%, 11%, and 14% of consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. No other country's net revenues exceeded 10% of consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, or 2015.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        13. Operating Segments and Geographic Region (Continued)

                Net revenues by platform were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         Years Ended December 31, 
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Net revenues by platform:

                  

        Console

         $2,389 $2,453 $2,391 

        PC

          2,042  2,124  1,499 

        Mobile and ancillary(1)

          2,081  1,674  418 

        Other(2)

          505  357  356 

        Total consolidated net revenues

         $7,017 $6,608 $4,664 

        (1)
        Net revenues from "Mobile and ancillary" include revenues from mobile devices, as well as non-platform specific game-related revenues, such as standalone sales of toys and accessories from our Skylanders® franchise and other physical merchandise and accessories.

        (2)
        Net revenues from "Other" include revenues from our Studios and Distribution businesses, as well as revenues from MLG and the Overwatch League.

                Long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         At December 31, 
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Long-lived assets* by geographic region:

                  

        Americas

         $197 $154 $138 

        EMEA

          75  87  42 

        Asia Pacific

          22  17  9 

        Total long-lived assets by geographic region

         $294 $258 $189 

        *
        The only long-lived assets that we classify by region are our long-term tangible fixed assets, which consist of property, plant, and equipment assets; all other long-term assets are not allocated by location.

                For information regarding significant customers, see "Concentration of Credit Risk" in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.2.

        14. Stock-Based CompensationShare-Based Payments

        Activision Blizzard Equity Incentive Plans

                On June 5, 2014, our shareholders approved the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (the "2014 Plan") andbecame effective. Under the 2014 Plan, became effective. The 2014 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is authorized to provide stock-basedshare-based compensation in the form of stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other performance- or value-based awards structured by the Compensation Committee within parameters set forth in the 2014 Plan. Upon the effective date of the 2014 Plan, including customwe ceased making awards that are denominated or payableunder our prior equity incentive plans


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Share-Based Payments (Continued)

        (collectively, the "Prior Plans"), although such plans will remain in valued in whole or in part by referenceeffect and continue to or otherwise based on or related to, shares of our common stock, or factors that may influence the value of our common stock or that are valued based on our performance or the performance of any of our subsidiaries or business units or other factors designated by the Compensation Committee, as well as incentive bonuses, for the purpose of providing incentives and rewards for superior performance to the directors, officers, employees of, and consultants to, Activision Blizzard and its subsidiaries.govern outstanding awards.

                While the Compensation Committee has broad discretion to create equity incentives, our stock-basedshare-based compensation program for the most part currently utilizes a combination of options and restricted stock units. OptionsThe majority of our options have time-based vesting schedules, generally vesting annually over a period of three to five years, and all options expire ten years from the grant date. Restricted stock units either have time-based vesting schedules, generally vesting in their entirety on an anniversary of the date of grant, or vesting annually over a period of three to five years, or vest only if certain performance measures are met. In addition, under the terms of the 2014 Plan, the exercise price for the options must be equal to or greater than the closing price per share of our common stock on the date the award is granted, as reported on NASDAQ.

                UponNasdaq. Restricted stock units have time-based vesting schedules, generally vesting in their entirety on an anniversary of the effective date of grant, or vest annually over a period of three to five years, and may also be contingent on the 2014 Plan, we ceased making awards under the following equity incentive plans (collectively, the "Prior Plans"), although such plans will remain in effect and continue to govern outstanding awards: (i) Activision, Inc. 1998 Incentive Plan, as amended; (ii) Activision, Inc. 1999 Incentive Plan, as amended; (iii) Activision, Inc. 2001 Incentive Plan, as amended; (iv) Activision, Inc. 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended; (v) Activision, Inc. 2002 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended; (vi) Activision, Inc. 2002 Studio Employee Retention Incentive Plan, as amended; (vii) Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended; (viii) Activision, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan; and (ix) Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan.achievement of specified performance measures.

                As of the date it was approved by our shareholders, there were 46 million shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan. The number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan has been, and may be further, increased from time to time by: (i)(1) the number of shares relating to awards outstanding under any Prior Plan that: (a)(i) expire, or are forfeited, terminated or canceled, without the issuance of shares; (b)(ii) are settled in cash in lieu of shares; or (c)(iii) are exchanged, prior to the issuance of shares of our common stock, for awards not involving our common stock; (ii)(2) if the exercise price of any option outstanding under any Prior PlanPlans is, or the tax withholding requirements with respect to any award outstanding under any Prior PlanPlans are, satisfied by withholding shares otherwise then deliverable in respect of the award or the actual or constructive transfer to the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        Company of shares already owned, the number of shares equal to the withheld or transferred shares; and (iii)(3) if a share appreciation right is exercised and settled in shares, a number of shares equal to the difference between the total number of shares with respect to which the award is exercised and the number of shares actually issued or transferred. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had approximately 4030 million shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2014 Plan. Shares issued in connection with awards made under the 2014 Plan are generally issued as new stock issuances.

                Additionally, in connection with the King Acquisition, a majority of the outstanding options and awards with respect to King shares that were unvested as of the King Closing Date were converted into equivalent options and awards with respect to shares of the Company's common stock (see Note 20 for further discussion). As part of the conversion, we assumed King's equity incentive plan (the "King Plan") and amended the King Plan to convert it to a plan with respect to shares of the Company's common stock for the King shares assumed. No future shares can be granted from the King Plan, but it continues to govern outstanding awards.

        Fair Value Valuation Assumptions

        Method and Assumptions on Valuation of Stock Options

                Our employeeThe fair value of stock options have features that differentiate them from exchange-traded options. These features include lack of transferability, early exercise, vesting restrictions, pre- and post-vesting termination provisions, blackout dates, and time-varying inputs. Agranted are principally estimated using a binomial-lattice model was selected because it is better able to explicitly address these features than closed-form models such as the Black-Scholes model, and is able to reflect expected future changes in model inputs, including changes in volatility, during the option's contractual term.

                We have estimated expected future changes in model inputs during the option's contractual term.model. The inputs required byin our binomial-lattice model include expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, risk-adjusted stock return, dividend yield, contractual term, and vesting schedule, as well as measures of employees' forfeiture,cancellations, exercise, and post-vesting termination behavior. Statistical methods wereare used to estimate employee rank-specific termination rates. These termination rates, in turn, were used


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Share-Based Payments (Continued)

                The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions, weighted average grant date fair value, and the range of expected stock price volatilities:

         
         Employee and Director
        Options
         
         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Expected life (in years)

          7.01  6.86  6.26 

        Volatility

          35.00% 35.31% 36.13%

        Risk free interest rate

          2.14% 1.56% 1.90%

        Dividend yield

          0.50% 0.67% 0.72%

        Weighted-average grant date fair value

         $21.11 $12.83 $9.87 

        Stock price volatility range:

                  

        Low

          28.19% 29.20% 26.96%

        High

          35.00% 36.00% 37.00%

          Expected life

                The expected life of employee stock options is a derived output of the binomial-lattice model and represents the number ofweighted-average period the stock options that are expected to vest and post-vesting termination behavior. Employee rank-specific estimatesremain outstanding. A binomial-lattice model can be viewed as assuming that employees will exercise their options when the stock price equals or exceeds an exercise multiple, of Expected Time-To-Exercise ("ETTE") were used to reflectwhich the multiple is based on historical employee exercise behavior. ETTE was estimated by using statistical procedures to first estimate the conditional probability of exercise occurring during each time period, conditional on the option surviving to that time period and then using those probabilities to estimate ETTE. The model was calibrated by adjusting parameters controlling exercise and post-vesting termination behavior so that the measures output by the model matched values of these measures that were estimated from historical data.behaviors.

                  The following tables present the weighted-average assumptions and the weighted-average fair value at grant date using the binomial-lattice model:Volatility

           
           Employee and
          Director Options
           
           
           For the Years
          Ended December 31,
           
           
           2015 2014 2013 

          Expected life (in years)

            6.26  5.97  6.44 

          Risk free interest rate

            1.90% 1.82% 1.86%

          Volatility

            36.13% 37.09% 39.00%

          Dividend yield

            0.72% 0.98% 1.08%

          Weighted-average fair value at grant date

           $9.87 $5.87 $4.97 

                To estimate volatility for the binomial-lattice model, we use methods that consider the implied volatility method based upon the volatilities forof exchange-traded options on our stock to estimate short-term volatility, the historical method (annualized standard deviationvolatility of the instantaneous returns on Activision Blizzard's stock)our common shares during the option's contractual term to estimate long-term volatility, and a statistical model to estimate the transition or "mean reversion" from short-term volatility to long-term volatility.

          Risk-free interest rate

                As is the case for volatility, the risk-free interest rate is assumed to change during the option's contractual term. The risk-free interest rate, which is based on U.S. Treasury yield curves, reflects the expected movement in the interest rate from one time period to the next ("forward rate").

          Dividend yield

                The expected dividend yield assumption is based on our historical and expected future amount of dividend payouts.

                Share-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and therefore has been reduced for estimated forfeitures in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant based on historical experience and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Stock-Based CompensationShare-Based Payments (Continued)

        long-term volatility. Based on these methods, for optionsValuation of Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs")

                The fair value of the Company's RSU awards granted duringis principally based upon the year ended December 31, 2015,closing price of the expectedCompany's stock price volatility ranged from 26.96% to 37.00%.

                As is the case for volatility, the risk-free rate is assumed to change during the option's contractual term. Consistent with the calculation required by a binomial-lattice model, the risk-free rate reflects the expected movement in the interest rate from one time period to the next ("forward rate") as opposed to the interest rate from the grant date to the given time period ("spot rate"). The expected dividend yield assumption for options granted during the year ended December 31, 2015 is based on the Company's historical and expected future amountdate of dividend payouts.

                The expected lifegrant reduced by the present value of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options aredividends expected to remain outstanding and is an output from the binomial-lattice model. The expected life of employeebe paid on our common stock options depends on all of the underlying assumptions and calibration of our model. A binomial-lattice model can be viewed as assuming that employees will exercise their options when the stock price equals or exceeds an exercise multiples, of which the multiple is based on historical employee exercise behaviors.

                As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 is based on awards ultimately expectedprior to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience.vesting.

        Accuracy of Fair Value Estimates

                We developed the assumptions used in the binomial-lattice model,models above, including model inputs and measures of employees' exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. Our ability to accurately estimate the fair value of stock-basedshare-based payment awards at the grant date depends upon the accuracy of the model and our ability to accurately forecast model inputs as long as ten10 years into the future. These inputs include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility, risk-free rate, dividend yield, and employee termination rates. Although the fair value of employee stock options is determined using an option-pricing model, the estimates that are produced by this model may not be indicative of the fair value observed between a willing buyer and a willing seller. Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine if this is the case, as markets do not currently exist that permit the active trading of employee stock option and other stock-basedshare-based instruments.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        Stock Option ActivitiesActivity

                Stock option activities foractivity is as follows:

         
         Number of
        Shares
        (in thousands)
         Weighted-
        average
        exercise price
         Weighted-
        average
        remaining
        contractual
        term (in years)
         Aggregate
        intrinsic value
        (in millions)
         

        Outstanding stock options at December 31, 2016

          31,485 $26.79       

        Granted

          2,579  59.89       

        Exercised

          (10,861) 16.44       

        Forfeited

          (2,650) 41.32       

        Expired

          (9) 16.41       

        Outstanding stock options at December 31, 2017

          20,544 $34.54  7.07 $591 

        Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017

          16,077 $31.79  7.26 $507 

        Exercisable at December 31, 2017

          6,747 $21.36  5.79 $283 

                For options assumed in the year endedKing Acquisition, 0.4 million of the options are based on performance conditions which do not have an accounting grant date as of December 31, 2015 are2017, as follows (amounts in millions, except numberthere is not a mutual understanding between the Company and the employee of shares, which are in thousands, and per share amounts):the performance terms.

         
         Shares Weighted-average
        exercise price
         Weighted-average
        remaining
        contractual term
         Aggregate
        intrinsic value
         

        Outstanding stock options at December 31, 2014

          29,486 $14.50       

        Granted

          4,133  32.55       

        Exercised

          (8,356) 13.08       

        Forfeited

          (928) 18.44       

        Expired

          (6) 8.73       

        Outstanding stock options at December 31, 2015

          24,329 $17.90  5.98 $506 

        Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2015

          23,448 $17.57  5.86 $496 

        Exercisable at December 31, 2015

          15,270 $13.51  4.19 $385 

                The aggregate intrinsic valuevalues in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (i.e. the difference between our closing stock price on the last trading day of the period and the exercise price, times the number of shares for options where the exerciseclosing stock price is belowgreater than the closing stockexercise price) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Share-Based Payments (Continued)

        that date. This amount changes based on the market value of our stock. The total intrinsic value of options actually exercised was $125$372 million, $117$161 million, and $104$125 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively. The total grant date fair value of options vested was $19$47 million, $19$40 million, and $29$19 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively.

                At December 31, 2015, $432017, $80 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.531.27 years.

        Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards ActivitiesRSU Activity

                We grant restricted stock units,RSUs, which represent the right to receive shares of our common stock, and restricted stock awards, which are issued and outstanding upon grant but subject to the risk of forfeiture (collectively referred to as "restricted stock rights").stock. Vesting for restricted stock rightsRSUs is contingent upon the holders' continued employment with us and may be subject to other conditions (which may include the satisfaction of a performance measure). Also, certain of our performance-vesting restricted stock rightsperformance-based RSUs include a range of shares that may be released at vesting which are above or below the targeted number of restricted stock rightsRSUs based on actual performance relative to the grant date performance measure. If the vesting conditions are not met, unvested restricted stock rightsRSUs will be forfeited. Holders of restricted stock are restricted from selling the shares until they vest. Upon vesting of restricted stock rights,the RSUs, we may withhold shares otherwise deliverable to satisfy minimum tax withholding requirements.

                The following table summarizes our restricted stock rightsRSU activity with performance-based RSUs presented at the maximum potential shares that could be earned and issued at vesting (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):

         
         Number of
        shares
         Weighted-
        Average Grant
        Date Fair Value
         

        Unvested RSUs at December 31, 2016

          11,977 $17.44 

        Granted

          3,298  63.75 

        Vested

          (2,233) 29.50 

        Forfeited

          (1,221) 26.41 

        Unvested RSUs at December 31, 2017

          11,821 $27.20 

                Certain of our performance-based RSUs did not have an accounting grant date as of December 31, 2017, as there is not a mutual understanding between the Company and the employee of the performance terms. Generally, these performance terms relate to operating income performance for future years where the performance goals have not yet been set. As of December 31, 2017, there were 4.4 million performance-based RSUs outstanding for which the accounting grant date has not been set, of which 1.9 million were 2017 grants. Accordingly, no grant date fair value was established and the weighted average grant date fair value calculated above for 2017 grants excludes these RSUs.

                At December 31, 2017, approximately $111 million of total unrecognized compensation cost was related to RSUs and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.44 years. Of the total unrecognized compensation cost, $102 million was related to performance-based RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.54 years. The total grant date fair value of vested RSUs was $64 million, $123 million and $93 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, with performance-vesting restricted stock right grants presented at the maximumrespectively.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Stock-Based CompensationShare-Based Payments (Continued)

        potential shares that could be earned and issued at vesting (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):

         
         Restricted Stock
        Rights
         Weighted-
        Average Grant
        Date Fair Value
         

        Unvested restricted stock rights balance at December 31, 2014

          17,967 $11.85 

        Granted*

          2,330  29.31 

        Vested

          (7,146) 12.80 

        Forfeited

          (1,221) 15.23 

        Unvested restricted stock rights balance at December 31, 2015

          11,930 $12.74 

        *
        1.7 million of the performance-vesting restricted stock rights granted at maximum potential shares did not have an accounting grant date as there is not a mutual understanding between the Company and the employee of the performance terms. Accordingly, no grant date fair value was established and the weighted averaged grant date fair value calculated above excludes these shares.

                At December 31, 2015, approximately $39 million of total unrecognized compensation cost was related to restricted stock rights and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.14 years. Of the total unrecognized compensation cost, $17 million was related to performance-vesting restricted stock rights, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.28 years. The total grant date fair value of vested restricted stock rights was $93 million, $92 million and $57 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

                The income tax benefit from stock option exercises and restricted stock rightsRSU vestings was $109$160 million, $89$134 million, and $77$109 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively.

                Certain of our performance-vesting restricted stock rights do not have an accounting grant date as of December 31, 2015, as there is not a mutual understanding between the Company and the employee of the performance terms. Generally, these performance terms relate to revenue and operating income performance for future years where the performance goals have not yet been set. As of December 31, 2015, there were 3.4 million performance-vesting restricted stock rights for which the accounting grant date has not been set.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        14. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        Stock-BasedShare-Based Compensation Expense

                The following table sets forth the total stock-basedshare-based compensation expense included in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 (amounts in millions):

         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2015 2014 2013 

        Cost of sales—online

         $ $1 $ 

        Cost of sales—software royalties and amortization

          15  17  17 

        Product development

          25  22  33 

        Sales and marketing

          9  8  7 

        General and administrative

          43  56  53 

        Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes

          92  104  110 

        Income tax benefit

          (27) (38) (40)

        Total stock-based compensation expense, net of income tax benefit

         $65 $66 $70 

                The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in our consolidated balance sheets as a component of "Software development" (amounts in millions):

         
         Software
        Development
         

        Balance at December 31, 2012

         $19 

        Stock-based compensation expense capitalized and deferred during period

          34 

        Amortization of capitalized and deferred stock-based compensation expense

          (31)

        Balance at December 31, 2013

         $22 

        Stock-based compensation expense capitalized and deferred during period

          27 

        Amortization of capitalized and deferred stock-based compensation expense

          (23)

        Balance at December 31, 2014

         $26 

        Stock-based compensation expense capitalized and deferred during period

          36 

        Amortization of capitalized and deferred stock-based compensation expense

          (34)

        Balance at December 31, 2015

         $28 
         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Cost of revenues—product sales: Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses

         $10 $20 $12 

        Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues: Game Operations and Distribution Costs

          1  2   

        Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues: Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses

          3  2  3 

        Product development

          57  47  25 

        Sales and marketing

          15  15  9 

        General and administrative

          92  73  43 

        Share-based compensation expense before income taxes

          178  159  92 

        Income tax benefit

          (34) (42) (27)

        Total share-based compensation expense, net of income tax benefit

         $144 $117 $65 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes

                Domestic and foreign income (loss) before income taxes and details of the income tax expense (benefit) are as follows (amounts in millions):


         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
          For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         

         2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

        Income before income tax expense:

                      

        Domestic

         $355 $325 $626  $185 $228 $355 

        Foreign

         766 656 693  966 878 766 

         $1,121 $981 $1,319  $1,151 $1,106 $1,121 

        Income tax expense (benefit):

                      

        Current:

                      

        Federal

         $169 $146 $110  $696 $(15)$169 

        State

         31 12 7  26 16 31 

        Foreign

         40 38 31  335 150 40 

        Total current

         240 196 148  1,057 151 240 

        Deferred:

                      

        Federal

         1 26 134  (111) 40 1 

        State

         (21) (18) (12) (32) (13) (21)

        Foreign

         9 (58) 39  (36) (38) 9 

        Total deferred

         (11) (50) 161  (179) (11) (11)

        Income tax expense

         $229 $146 $309  $878 $140 $229 

                For the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017 and 2013, income2016, excess tax benefits attributable to equity-basedshare-based compensation transactions exceededare recognized to the amountsextent that tax deduction on share-based compensation exceeds the corresponding compensation cost recorded based on grant date fair value. Accordingly, $65 million, $30the financial statement. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recognized $113 million and $11$81 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits from share-based payments as a reduction to income tax expense due to our adoption of a new accounting standard in 2016. For periods prior to 2016, such excess tax benefits were creditedrecorded to shareholder's equity, respectively, in these years.shareholders' equity.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)

                The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and the income tax expense (benefit) at the effective tax rate for each of the years are as follows (amounts in millions):


         For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 

         2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

        Federal income tax provision at statutory rate

         $392 35%$343 35%$462 35% $403 35%$387 35%$392 35%

        State taxes, net of federal benefit

         5  5  6   4  9 1 5  

        Research and development credits

         (26) (2) (24) (2) (49) (4) (26) (2) (36) (3) (26) (2)

        Foreign rate differential

         (228) (20) (245) (25) (174) (13) (271) (24) (239) (22) (228) (20)

        Change in tax reserves

         136 12 128 13 89 7  291 25 210 19 136 12 

        Net operating loss tax attribute assumed from the Purchase Transaction

         (63) (6) (52) (5) (16) (1) (36) (3) (114) (10) (63) (6)

        Excess tax benefits related to share-based payments

         (113) (10) (81) (7)   

        U.S. Tax Reform Act

         636 55     

        Other

         13 1 (9) (1) (9) (1) (10)  4  13 1 

        Income tax expense

         $229 20%$146 15%$309 23% $878 76%$140 13%$229 20%

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)

                The Company's tax rate is affected by the tax rates in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, the relative amount of income earned by jurisdiction, and the jurisdictions with a statutory tax rate less than the U.S. rate of 35%.

                ForOn December 22, 2017, the year ended December, 2015, 2014 and 2013,U.S. Tax Reform Act was enacted. The U.S. Tax Reform Act, among other things, reduced the Company's income beforeU.S. corporate income tax expense was $1,121 million, $981 million,rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018 and $1,319 million, respectively, and our incomeimplemented a modified territorial tax system that imposes a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries ("Transition Tax").

                On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on how to account for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act under ASC 740. SAB 118 enables companies to record a provisional amount for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act based on a reasonable estimate, subject to adjustment during a measurement period of up to one year, until accounting is complete.

                We recorded a provisional amount for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act based on a reasonable estimate in the fourth quarter of 2017 resulting in a charge of $636 million. This includes current tax expense was $229of $555 million (or a 20% effectiverelated to the Transition Tax, which is payable over eight years, and deferred tax rate), $146expense of $81 million (or a 15% effective tax rate), and $309 million (or a 23% effective tax rate), respectively. Overall, our effective tax rate differsrelated to the remeasurement of deferred taxes resulting from the U.S. statutorycorporate income tax rate of 35%, primarily due to earnings taxed at relatively lower rates in foreign jurisdictions, recognitionreduction. Accounting for the income tax effects of the California researchU.S. Tax Reform Act requires complex new calculations to be performed and development ("R&D") credits, and recognitionsignificant judgments in interpreting the legislation. Additional guidance may be issued on how the provisions of the retroactive reinstatementU.S. Tax Reform Act will be applied or otherwise administered that is different from our interpretation. We may make adjustments to the provisional amounts as we collect and prepare the data necessary to finalize our calculations, interpret the U.S. Tax Reform Act and any additional guidance issued, and consider the effects of any additional actions we may take as a result of the federal R&D tax credit, partially offset byU.S. Tax Reform Act.

                We continue to analyze the prospective effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, including new provisions impacting certain foreign income, such as GILTI, BEAT, and FDII, potential limitations on interest expense deductions, and changes into the Company's liability for uncertain tax positions.provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, among other provisions of the U.S. Tax Reform Act.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)

                In 2013, in connection with the October 11, 2013 repurchase of approximately 429 million shares of our common stock ("Purchase Transaction,Transaction"), we assumed certain tax attributes, of New VH, which generally consistconsisting of New VH's net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards of approximately $760 million, which represent a potential future tax benefit of approximately $266 million. The utilization of such NOL carryforwards will be subject to certain annual limitations and will begin to expire in 2021. The Company also obtained indemnification from Vivendi against losses attributable to the disallowance of claimed utilization of such NOL carryforwards of up to $200 million in unrealized tax benefits in the aggregate, limited to taxable years ending on or prior to December 31, 2016. No benefit for these tax attributes or indemnification was recorded upon the close of the Purchase Transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we utilized $180 million and $148 million, respectively, of the NOL, which resulted in benefits of $63 million and $52 million, respectively. The benefits for the year ended December 31, 2015, were reduced by $5 million for return to provision adjustments recorded. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had utilized approximately $760 million of the original NOL and 2014, a corresponding reserve of $58 million and $52 million, respectively, were established. As of December 31, 2015,had recorded an indemnification asset of $125$200 million has been recorded in "Other Assets", and, correspondingly,assets." Correspondingly, the same amount has beenwas recorded as a reduction to the consideration paid for the shares repurchased in "Treasury Stock" (see Note 1stock." In each of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details aboutyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, we utilized $103 million, $326 million, and $180 million of the share repurchase).


        TableNOL and recognized a corresponding reserve of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)$36 million, $114 million, and $63 million in each of those years ended, respectively.

                Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The components of the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (amounts in millions):


         As of
        December 31,
          As of December 31, 

         2015 2014  2017 2016 

        Deferred tax assets:

                  

        Allowance for sales returns and price protection

         $66 $74  $47 $64 

        Inventory reserve

         11 9  5 9 

        Accrued expenses

         40 38  26 25 

        Deferred revenue

         288 291  245 233 

        Tax credit carryforwards

         58 50  60 48 

        Net operating loss carryforwards

         10 10  11 10 

        Stock-based compensation

         54 69 

        Transaction costs

         9 9 

        Share-based compensation

         59 61 

        Acquired intangibles

         149 111 

        State taxes

         22 24 

        Other

         19 13  39 28 

        Deferred tax assets

         555 563  663 613 

        Valuation allowance

              

        Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

         555 563  663 613 

        Deferred tax liabilities:

                  

        Intangibles

         (166) (169)

        Acquired intangibles

         (146) (219)

        Prepaid royalties

         (30) (22) (19) (60)

        Capitalized software development expenses

         (81) (84) (55) (91)

        State taxes

         (7) (34)

        Other

         (6)   (5) (4)

        Deferred tax liabilities

         (290) (309) (225) (374)

        Net deferred tax assets

         $265 $254  $438 $239 

                As of December 31, 2015,2017, we havehad gross tax credit carryforwards of $40 million and $119$152 million for federal and state purposes, respectively, which begin to expire in fiscal 2025.purposes. The tax credit carryforwards are presented in "Deferred tax assets" net of unrealized tax benefits that


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)

        would apply upon the realization of uncertain tax positions. Through ourIn addition, we had foreign operations, we have approximately $36 million in NOL carryforwards of $33 million at December 31, 2015,2017, attributed mainly to losses in France and Ireland, the majority of which can be carried forward indefinitely.

                We evaluate our deferred tax assets, including net operating losses and tax credits, to determine if a valuation allowance is required. We assess whether a valuation allowance should be established or released based on the consideration of all available evidence using a "more-likely-than-not" standard. Realization of the U.S. deferred tax assets is dependent upon the continued generation of sufficient taxable income. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the net carrying value of the U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized. At December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, there are no valuation allowances on deferred tax assets.

                As of December 31, 2017, we no longer consider the available cash balances related to undistributed earnings of our most significant foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested. As a result of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, we continue to assess and may change our intentions related to the indefinite reinvestment assertion. Any impact resulting from such a change in this assertion during the SAB 118 measurement period will be recorded as an adjustment to the provisional amount recorded for the effects of the U.S. Tax Reform Act in the period in which such determination is made.

                Activision Blizzard's tax years 2009 through 2016 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The IRS is currently examining the Company's federal tax returns for the 2009 through 2011 tax years, and during February 2018, the Company was notified that our tax returns for 2012 through 2016 tax years will be subject to examination. The Company also has several state and non-U.S. audits pending. In addition, as part of purchase price accounting for the King Acquisition, the Company assumed $74 million of uncertain tax positions primarily related to the transfer pricing on King tax years occurring prior to the King Acquisition. The Company is currently in negotiations with the relevant jurisdictions and taxing authorities with respect to King's transfer pricing, which could result in a different allocation of profits and losses between the relevant jurisdictions.

                On December 28, 2017, we received a Notice of Reassessment from the French Tax Authority ("FTA") related to transfer pricing concerning intercompany transactions involving one of our French subsidiaries for the 2011 through 2013 tax years. The total assessment, including penalties and interest, was approximately €571 million ($680 million). We disagree with the proposed assessment and intend to vigorously contest it. We plan to pursue all remedies available to us to successfully resolve this matter, including administrative remedies with the FTA, and judicial remedies, if necessary. While we believe our tax provisions at December 31, 2017 are appropriate, until such time as this matter is ultimately resolved we could be subject to significant additional tax liabilities. In addition to the risk of additional tax for years 2011 through 2013, if litigation regarding this matter were adversely determined and/or if the FTA were to seek adjustments of a similar nature for subsequent years, we could be subject to significant additional tax liabilities.

                In addition, certain of our subsidiaries are under examination or investigation or may be subject to examination or investigation by tax authorities in various jurisdictions. These proceedings may lead to adjustments or proposed adjustments to our taxes or provisions for uncertain tax positions. Such proceedings may have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations in the period or periods in which the matters are resolved or in which appropriate tax provisions are taken into account in our financial statements. If we were to receive a


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)

                Cumulative undistributed earningsmaterially adverse assessment from a taxing jurisdiction, we would plan to vigorously contest it and consider all of foreign subsidiaries for which no deferred taxes have been provided approximated $4,084 million at December 31, 2015. Deferred income taxes on these earnings have not been provided as these amounts are considered to be permanent in duration. Determinationour options, including the pursuit of the unrecognized deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings is not practicable because of the complexity of the hypothetical calculation. In the event of a distribution of these earnings to the U.S. in the form of a dividend, we may be subject to both foreign withholding taxes and U.S. income taxes net of allowable foreign tax credits.

                Vivendi Games results for the period January 1, 2008 through July 9, 2008 are included in the consolidated federal and certain foreign state and local income tax returns filed by Vivendi or its affiliates while Vivendi Games results for the period from July 10, 2008 through December 31, 2008 are included in the consolidated federal and certain foreign, state and local income tax returns filed by Activision Blizzard. Vivendi Games tax year 2008 remains open to examination by the major taxing authorities. In addition, Vivendi Games' tax return for the 2008 tax year is before the appeals function of the IRS and is under examination by several state taxing authorities.

                Activision Blizzard's tax years 2008 through 2014 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The IRS is currently examining the Company's federal tax returns for the 2008 through 2011 tax years. During the second quarter of 2015, the Company transitioned the review of its transfer pricing methodology from the advanced pricing agreement review process to the IRS examination team. Their review could result in a different allocation of profits and losses under the Company's transfer pricing agreements. Such allocation could have a positive or negative impact on our provision for the period in which such a determination is reached and the relevant periods thereafter. The Company also has several state and non-U.S. audits pending.judicial remedies.

                As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had approximately $552$1,138 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $529$1,114 million would affect our effective tax rate, if recognized. A reconciliation of total gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 is as follows (amounts in millions):


         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
          For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         

         2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

        Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1

         $419 $294 $207  $846 $552 $419 

        Gross increase for tax positions of prior-years

         8 2 1  66 89 8 

        Gross decrease for tax positions of prior-years

         (11)     (17) (11)

        Gross increase for tax positions of current year

         136 125 91  229 240 136 

        Settlement with taxing authorities

          (2)   (1) (18)  

        Lapse of statute of limitations

           (5) (2)   

        Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31

         $552 $419 $294  $1,138 $846 $552 

                We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in "Income tax expense".        As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, we had approximately $41$121 million and $18$71 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. For the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, we recorded $10$28 million, $5$17 million, and $2$10 million, respectively, of interest expense related to uncertain tax positions.

                The final resolution of the Company's global tax disputes is uncertain. There is significant judgment required in the analysis of disputes, including the probability determination and estimation of the potential exposure. Based on current information, in the opinion of the Company's management, the ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations, except as noted above.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        15. Income Taxes (Continued)

                Based on the current status with the IRS, there is insufficient information to identify any significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months. However, the Company may recognize a benefit of up to approximately $18 million related to the settlement of tax audits and/or the expiration of statutes of limitations in the next twelve months.

                Although the final resolution of the Company's global tax disputes, audits, or any particular issue with the applicable taxing authority is uncertain, based on current information, in the opinion of the Company's management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, any settlement or resolution of the Company's global tax disputes, audits, or any particular issue with the applicable taxing authority could have a material favorable or unfavorable effect on our business and results of operations in the period in which the matters are ultimately resolved.

        16. Computation of Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Common Share

                The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (amounts in millions, except per share data):


         For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         

         2015 2014 2013  2017 2016 2015 

        Numerator:

                      

        Consolidated net income

         $892 $835 $1,010  $273 $966 $892 

        Less: Distributed earnings to unvested stock-based awards that participate in earnings

         (4) (4) (5)

        Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to unvested stock-based awards that participate in earnings

         (7) (14) (18)

        Less: Distributed earnings to unvested share-based awards that participate in earnings

          (2) (4)

        Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to unvested share-based awards that participate in earnings

          (2) (7)

        Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share—income available to common shareholders

         $881 $817 $987  $273 $962 $881 

        Denominator:

                      

        Denominator for basic earnings per common share—weighted-average common shares outstanding

         728 716 1,024  754 740 728 

        Effect of potential dilutive common shares under the treasury stock method: Employee stock options

         11 10 11 

        Effect of dilutive stock options and awards under the treasury stock method

         12 14 11 

        Denominator for diluted earnings per common share—weighted-average common shares outstanding plus dilutive effect of employee stock options

         739 726 1,035 

        Denominator for diluted earnings per common share—weighted-average common shares outstanding plus dilutive common shares under the treasury stock method

         766 754 739 

        Basic earnings per common share

         $1.21 $1.14 $0.96  $0.36 $1.30 $1.21 

        Diluted earnings per common share

         $1.19 $1.13 $0.95  $0.36 $1.28 $1.19 

                Certain of our unvested restricted stock rights (including certain restricted stock units restricted stock awards, and performance shares) metmeet the definition of participating securities as they participate in earnings based on their rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Therefore, we are required to use the two-class method in our computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share. For the years ended December 31, 20152017, 2016, and 2014,2015, on a weighted-average basis, we had outstanding unvested restricted stock rights with respect to 8units of less than 1 million, 3 million, and 158 million shares of common stock, respectively, that are participating in earnings, respectively.earnings.


        Table        The vesting of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        16. Computation of Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Common Share (Continued)

                Certaincertain of our employee-related restricted stock rightsunits and options are contingently issuablecontingent upon the satisfaction of pre-defined performance measures. TheseThe shares underlying these equity awards are included in the weighted-average dilutive common shares only if the performance measures are met as of the end of the reporting period. Approximately 7 million, 8 million, and 3 million shares are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, as their respective performance measures havehad not been met. Approximately 4 million shares are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2014 as their respective performance measures have notyet been met.

                Potential common shares are not included in the denominator of the diluted earnings per common share calculation when the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive, such as in a period in which a net loss is recorded.anti-dilutive. Therefore, options to acquire 1 million, 25 million, and 51 million shares of common stock were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.


                See Note 1Table of the Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the Purchase Transaction which reduced outstanding shares in 2014 as compared to 2013.(Continued)

        17. Capital Transactions

        Stock Purchase Agreement

                On October 11, 2013, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we completed the Purchase Transaction, repurchasing approximately 429 million shares of our common stock for a cash payment of $5.83 billion, pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement (refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financing details of the Purchase Transaction). The repurchased shares were recorded in "Treasury Stock" in our consolidated balance sheet.

        Repurchase Programs

                On February 3, 2015,2, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we mayare authorized to repurchase up to $750 million$1 billion of our common stock during the two-year period from February 9, 201513, 2017 through February 8, 2017. During12, 2019. As of the year ended December 31, 2015, there were nodate hereof, we have not repurchased any shares under this program and the determination as to if and when we make any such stock repurchases pursuant to this stock repurchase program.will be dependent on market conditions and other factors.

        DividendDividends

                On February 2, 2016,1, 2018, our Board of Directors declaredDirector approved a cash dividend of $0.26$0.34 per common share,share. Such dividend is payable on May 11, 2016,9, 2018, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2016.2018.

                On February 3, 2015,2, 2017, our Board of Directors declaredapproved a cash dividend of $0.23$0.30 per common share, payable onshare. On May 13, 2015,10, 2017, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $226 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2015.2017. On May 26, 2017, we made related dividend equivalent payments of less than $1 million to certain holders of restricted stock units.

                On February 2, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.26 per common share. On May 11, 2016, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $192 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2016. On May 27, 2016, we made related dividend equivalent payments of $3 million to certain holders of restricted stock units.

                On February 3, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.23 per common share. On May 13, 2015, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $167 million to such shareholders andof record at the close of business on March 30,2015. On May 29, 2015, we made related dividend equivalent payments of $3 million to certain holders of restricted stock rights.units.

        18. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

                On February 6, 2014, our BoardSupplemental cash flow information is as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2017 2016 2015 

        Supplemental cash flow information:

                  

        Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds

         $176 $121 $20 

        Cash paid for interest

          145  209  193 

                For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had non-cash purchase price consideration of Directors declared a$89 million related to vested and unvested stock options and awards that were assumed and replaced with Activision Blizzard equity or deferred cash dividend of $0.20 per common share, payable on May 14, 2014,awards in the King Acquisition. Refer to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 2014. OnNote 20 for further discussion.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        17. Capital Transactions (Continued)

        May 14, 2014, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $143 million to such shareholders, and on May 30, 2014, we made related dividend equivalent payments of $4 million to the holders of restricted stock rights.

                On February 7, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per common share, payable on May 15, 2013, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 20, 2013. On May 15, 2013, we made an aggregate cash dividend payment of $212 million to such shareholders, and on May 31, 2013, we made related dividend equivalent payments of $4 million to the holders of restricted stock rights.

        18. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

                Supplemental cash flow information is as follows (amounts in millions):

         
         For the Years Ended
        December 31,
         
         
         2015 2014 2013 

        Supplemental cash flow information:

                  

        Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds

         $20 $34 $138 

        Cash paid for interest

          193  201  19 

        19. Commitments and Contingencies

        Letters of Credit

                As described in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, a portion of our Revolver can be used to issue letters of credit of up to $50 million, subject to the availability of the Revolver. At December 31, 2015, we did not have any letters of credit issued under the Revolver.

                We maintain two irrevocable standby letters of credit, which are required by one of our inventory manufacturers so that we can qualify for certain payment terms on our inventory purchases. Our standby letters of credit were for $8 millionCommitments and 3 million euros ($3 million) at December 31, 2015, and $10 million and 1 million euros ($1 million) at December 31, 2014. For the standby letter of credit denominated in U.S. dollars, under the terms of the arrangements, we are required to maintain a compensating balance on deposit with a bank, restricted as to use, of not less than the sum of the available amount of the letter of credit plus the aggregate amount of any drawings under the letter of credit that have been honored thereunder, but not reimbursed. Both letters of credit were undrawn at December 31, 2015 and 2014.

        CommitmentsObligations

                In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements with third parties for non-cancelable operating lease agreements for our offices, for the development of products and for the rights to intellectual property. Under these agreements, we commit to provide specified payments to a lessor, developer or intellectual property holder, as the case may be, based upon contractual arrangements. The payments to third-party developers are generally conditioned upon the achievement by the developers of contractually specified development milestones. Further, these payments to third-party developers and intellectual property holders typically are deemed to be advances and, as such, are


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        19. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        recoupable against future royalties earned by the developer or intellectual property holder based on sales of the related game. Additionally, in connection with certain intellectual property rights, acquisitions and development agreements, we commit to spend specified amounts for marketing support for the game(s) which is (are) to be developed or in which the intellectual property will be utilized. Assuming all contractual provisions are met, the total future minimum commitments for these and other contractual arrangements in place at December 31, 20152017 are scheduled to be paid as follows (amounts in millions):


         Contractual Obligations(1)  Contractual Obligations(1) 

         Facility and
        Equipment
        Leases
         Developer and
        Intellectual
        Properties
         Marketing Total  Facility and
        Equipment
        Leases
         Developer and
        Intellectual
        Properties
         Marketing Long-Term
        Debt
        Obligations(2)
         Total 

        For the years ending December 31,

                            

        2016

         $35 $190 $28 $253 

        2017

         32 5 53 90 

        2018

         30  15 45  $81 $202 $19 $159 $461 

        2019

         27   27  70 2  159 231 

        2020

         19   19  61 1  159 221 

        2021

         48   1,790 1,838 

        2022

         41   512 553 

        Thereafter

         35 2  37  88   3,064 3,152 

        Total

         $178 $197 $96 $471  $389 $205 $19 $5,843 $6,456 

        (1)
        We have omitted uncertain income tax liabilities from this table due to the inherent uncertainty regarding the timing of the potential issue resolution.resolution of the underlying matters. Specifically, either (a) the underlying positions have not been fully developed under audit to quantify at this time or, (b) the years relating to the issuesmatters for certain jurisdictions are not currently under audit. At December 31, 2015,2017, we had $471$455 million and $495 million of net unrecognized tax benefits of which $453 million was included in "Other liabilities" and $18 million was included in "Accrued expenses and other liabilities" and "Other liabilities," respectively, in our consolidated balance sheet.

        Additionally, as a result of the U.S. Tax Reform Act, we recorded a liability at December 31, 2017, of $467 million which reflects our estimated Transition Tax net payments. This provisional amount is subject to change as we collect and prepare the data necessary to finalize our calculations, interpret the U.S. Tax Reform Act and any additional guidance issued. The Transition Tax liability is payable over up to eight years and is not reflected in our Contractual Obligations table above. We expect to pay $77 million of the Transition Tax during 2018.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        19. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        (2)
        Long-term debt obligations represent our obligations related to the contractual principal repayments and interest payments under the 2017 TLA and the Notes as of December 31, 2017. There was no outstanding balance under our Revolver as of December 31, 2017. The Notes are subject to fixed interest rates and we have calculated the interest obligation based on the applicable rates and payment dates. The 2017 TLA bears a variable interest rate and interest is payable at least quarterly. We have calculated the expected interest obligation based on the outstanding principal balance and interest rate applicable at December 31, 2017. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on our debt obligations.

        Legal Proceedings

                We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims. SEC regulations govern disclosure        As described in Note 15, on December 28, 2017, we received a Notice of legal proceedings in periodic reports and FASB ASC Topic 450 governsReassessment from the disclosure of loss contingencies and accrual of loss contingencies in respect of litigation and other claims. We record an accrual for a potential loss when it is probable that a loss will occur and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. When the reasonable estimate of the potential loss is within a range of amounts, the minimum of the range of potential loss is accrued, unless a higher amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range. Moreover, even if an accrual is not required, we provide additional disclosureFTA related to litigationtransfer pricing concerning intercompany transactions involving one of our French subsidiaries for the 2011 through 2013 tax years. The total assessment, including penalties and other claims when itinterest, was approximately €571 million ($680 million). We disagree with the proposed assessment and intend to vigorously contest it. We plan to pursue all remedies available to us to successfully resolve this matter, including administrative remedies with the FTA, and judicial remedies, if necessary. While we believe our tax provisions at December 31, 2017 are appropriate, until such time as this matter is reasonably possible (i.e., more than remote) that the outcomes of such litigation and other claims include potential material adverse impacts on us.

                The outcomes of legal proceedings and other claims areultimately resolved we could be subject to significant uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. There is significant judgment required in the analysis of these matters, including the probability determination and whether a potential exposure can be reasonably estimated.additional tax liabilities. In making these determinations, we, in consultation with outside counsel, examine the


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        19. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        relevant facts and circumstances on a quarterly basis assuming, as applicable, a combination of settlement and litigated outcomes and strategies. Moreover, legal matters are inherently unpredictable and the timing of development of factors on which reasonable judgments and estimates can be based can be slow. As such, there can be no assurance that the final outcome of any legal matter will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, profitability, cash flows or liquidity.

        Purchase Transaction Matters

                In prior periods, the Company reported on litigation relatedaddition to the Purchase Transaction. Duringrisk of additional tax for years 2011 through 2013, if litigation regarding this matter were adversely determined and/or if the period ended June 30, 2015, the casesFTA were resolved and dismissed with prejudice. As partto seek adjustments of the resolution of the claims,a similar nature for subsequent years, we received a settlement payment of $202 million in July 2015 from Vivendi, ASAC, and our insurers. We recorded the settlement within "Shareholders' equity" in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.

        Other Matterscould be subject to significant additional tax liabilities.

                In addition, we are party to routine claims, suits, investigations, audits, and other proceedings arising from the ordinary course of business, including with respect to intellectual property rights, contractual claims, labor and employment matters, regulatory matters, tax matters, unclaimed property matters, compliance matters, and collection matters. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, such routine claims and lawsuits are not significant and we do not expect them to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

        20. Related Party TransactionsPurchase Transaction Matters

        Transactions        In prior periods, the Company reported on litigation related to the Purchase Transaction. During the period ended June 30, 2015, the cases were resolved and dismissed with Vivendi and Its Affiliates

        prejudice. As part of the Business Combination in 2008, we entered into various transactions and agreements, including cash management services agreements, a tax sharing agreement and an investor agreement, with Vivendi and its subsidiaries. In connection with the consummationresolution of the Purchase Transaction,claims, we terminatedreceived a settlement payment of $202 million in July 2015 from Vivendi, ASAC LP, and our insurers. We recorded the cash management arrangements with Vivendi and amendedsettlement within "Shareholders' equity" in our investor agreement with Vivendi. We are also partyconsolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.

        Letters of Credit

                As described in Note 11, a portion of our Revolver can be used to a numberissue letters of agreements with subsidiaries and other affiliatescredit of Vivendi, including music licensing and distribution arrangements and promotional arrangements, none of which were impacted by the Purchase Transaction. None of these services, transactions, and agreements with Vivendi and its affiliates were material, either individually or in the aggregate,up to $50 million, subject to the consolidated financial statements as a whole. As discussed in Note 1availability of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, on May 28, 2014, Vivendi sold 41 million shares, reducing its ownership interest below 10%, and is no longer considered a related party. Subsequent toRevolver. At December 31, 2015, Vivendi sold their remaining shares2017, we did not have any letters of our common stock.

        Transactions with ASAC's Affiliates

                Pursuant tocredit issued or outstanding under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company and each of Mr. Kotick, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Kelly, the Company's Chairman of the board of directors, entered into a waiver and acknowledgement letters (together, the "Waivers"), which provide, among other things, (i) that the Purchase Transaction, Private Sale, any public offerings by Vivendi and restructurings by Vivendi and its subsidiaries contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement and otherRevolver.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        20. Related Party Transactions (Continued)Acquisitions

        transaction documents, shall not (or shall be deemed not to) constituteKing Digital Entertainment

                On February 23, 2016, we completed the King Acquisition, purchasing all of its outstanding shares. As a "changeresult, King became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Activision Blizzard. King is a leading global developer and publisher of interactive entertainment content and services, particularly on mobile platforms, such as Android and iOS, and on online and social platforms, such as Facebook and the king.com websites. King's results of operations since the King Closing Date are included in control" (or similar term) under their respective employment arrangements, including their employment agreements withour consolidated financial statements.

                We made this acquisition because we believed that the addition of King's highly-complementary mobile business positioned the Company as a global leader in interactive entertainment across console, PC, and mobile platforms, and aligned us for future growth.

                The aggregate purchase price of the Company's 2008 Incentive Plan or any award agreements in respectKing Acquisition was approximately $5.8 billion, which was paid on the King Closing Date and funded primarily with $3.6 billion of awards granted thereunder, or any Other Benefit Plansexisting cash and Arrangements (as defined$2.2 billion of cash from new debt issued by the Company. We identified and recorded assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values at the King Closing Date, and allocated the remaining value of approximately $2.7 billion to goodwill.

                The final purchase price allocation was as follows (in millions):

         
         February 23,
        2016
         Estimated
        useful lives

        Tangible assets and liabilities assumed:

             

        Cash and cash equivalents

         $1,151  

        Accounts receivable

          162  

        Other current assets

          72  

        Property and equipment

          57 2 - 7 years

        Deferred income tax assets, net

          27  

        Other assets

          47  

        Accounts payable

          (9) 

        Accrued expenses and other liabilities

          (272) 

        Other liabilities

          (110) 

        Deferred income tax liabilities, net

          (52) 

        Intangible assets

             

        Internally-developed franchises

          845 3 - 5 years

        Customer base

          609 2 years

        Developed software

          580 3 - 4 years

        Trade name

          46 7 years

        Goodwill

          2,675  

        Total purchase price

         $5,828  

                During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred $38 million of expenses related to the King Acquisition, which are included within "General and administrative" in the Waivers), (ii) (A) that the sharesconsolidated statements of our common stock acquired by ASAC and held or controlled by the ASAC Investors (as defined in the Waivers) in connection with the Transactions (as defined in the Waivers) will not be included in or count toward, (B) that the ASAC Investors will not be deemed to be a group for purposes of, and (C) any changes in the composition in the Board of Directors of the Company, in connection with or during the one-year period following the consummation of the Transactions will not contribute towards, a determination that a "change in control" or similar term has occurred with respect to Messrs. Kotick and Kelly's employment arrangements with the Company, and (iii) for the waiver by Messrs. Kotick and Kelly of their rights to change in control payments or benefits under their employment agreements with the Company, the Company's 2008 Incentive Plan or any award agreements in respect of awards granted thereunder, and any Other Benefit Plans and Arrangements (in each case, with respect to all current and future grants, awards, benefits or entitlements) in connection with or as a consequence of the Transactions.

                Also pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, on October 11, 2013, we, ASAC and, for the limited purposes set forth therein, Messrs. Kotick and Kelly entered into the Stockholders Agreement. The Stockholders Agreement contains various agreements among the parties regarding voting rights, transfer rights, and a standstill agreement, among other things.operations. In connection with the settlementdebt financing that occurred on the King Closing Date, we incurred $38 million of the litigation related to the Purchase Transaction, the parties to the Stockholders Agreement amendeddiscounts and financing costs that agreement on May 28, 2015.

        21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        Revenue recognition

                In May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. This new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topicwere capitalized and eliminate all industry-specific guidance. The new revenue recognition standard provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance will be effective beginning January 1, 2018 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are evaluating the adoption method as well as the impact of this new accounting guidancerecorded within "Long-term debt, net" on our financial statements.

        Stock-based compensation

                In June 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to stock compensation.consolidated balance sheet. The new standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair valueamortization of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The new standard is effective forthese capitalized


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements20. Acquisitions (Continued)

        fiscal years beginning aftercosts was not material to our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 15, 201531, 2016.

          Share-Based Compensation

                In connection with the King Acquisition, a majority of the outstanding King options and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to allother equity awards outstandingthat were unvested as of the King Closing Date were converted into equivalent options and awards with respect to shares of the Company's common stock, using an equity award exchange ratio calculated in accordance with the transaction agreement. As a result, replacement options and other equity awards of 10 million and 3 million, respectively, were issued. The portion of the fair value related to pre-combination services of $76 million was included in the purchase price, while the remaining fair value will be recognized over the remaining service periods. As of December 31, 2016, the future expense for the converted King unvested stock options and equity awards was approximately $40 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average service period of approximately 1.6 years.

                The remaining portion of outstanding unvested awards that were assumed were replaced with deferred cash awards. The cash proceeds were placed in an escrow-like account with the cash releases to occur based on the awards' original vesting schedule upon future service being rendered. The cash associated with these awards is recorded in "Other current assets" and "Other assets" in our consolidated balance sheet. The portion of the fair value related to pre-combination services of $22 million was included in the purchase price while the remaining fair value of approximately $9 million will be recognized over the remaining service periods.

          Identifiable Intangible Assets Acquired and Goodwill

                The internally-developed franchises, customer base, developed software, and trade name intangible assets from the acquisition of King will be amortized to "Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues—Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses," "Sales and marketing," "Cost of revenues—subscription, licensing, and other revenues—Software royalties, amortization, and intellectual property licenses," and "General and administrative," respectively. The intangible assets will be amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits received.

                The $2.7 billion of goodwill recognized is primarily attributable to the benefits the Company expects to derive from accelerated expansion as an interactive entertainment provider in the mobile sector, future franchises, and technology, as well as the management team's proven ability to create future games and franchises. Approximately $620 million of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes in the U.S.

          King Net Revenue and Earnings

                The amount of net revenue and earnings attributable to King in the Company's consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2016, the period of the King Acquisition, are included in the table below. The amounts presented represent the net revenues and earnings after


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        20. Acquisitions (Continued)

        adjustments for purchase price accounting, inclusive of amortization of intangible assets, share-based payments, and deferrals of revenues and related cost of revenues.

        (in millions)
         For the Year
        Ended
        December 31, 2016
         

        Net revenues

         $1,523 

        Net loss

         $(230)

          Pro Forma Financial Information

                The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the Company and King, on a pro forma basis, as though the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015. The 2016 pro forma financial information presented includes the effects of adjustments related to amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, employee compensation from replacement equity awards issued in the King Acquisition and the profit sharing bonus plan established as part of the King Acquisition, and interest expense from the new debt issued in connection with the King Acquisition, among other adjustments. We also adjusted for Activision Blizzard and King non-recurring acquisition-related costs of approximately $74 million incurred for the year ended December 31, 2016. The 2015 pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2015 were adjusted to include these charges.

                The unaudited pro forma financial information as presented below is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the King Acquisition, and any borrowings undertaken to finance the King Acquisition, had taken place at the beginning of the earliest annual period presented, as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

        Consolidations

                In February 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to consolidations. The new standard amends certain requirements for determining whether a variable interest entity must be consolidated. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

        Debt Issuance Costs

                In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. The new standard requires an entity to present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continuenor does it intend to be reported as interest expense. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The new guidance will be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The adoptiona projection of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements.future results.

         
         For the Year
        Ended
        December 31,
         
        (in millions)
         2016 2015 

        Net revenues

         $6,888 $6,677 

        Net income

         $1,005 $639 

        Basic earnings per common share

         $1.35 $0.87 

        Diluted earnings per common share

         $1.32 $0.85 

        21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        Internal-Use Software

                In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to internal-use software. The new standard relates to a customer'sRecently adopted accounting for fees paid in cloud computing arrangements. The amendment provides guidance for customers to determine whether such arrangements include software licenses. If a cloud arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses and account for the non-software element as a service contract. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.pronouncements

        Inventory

                In July 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to the measurement of inventory which requires inventory within the scope of the guidance to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. TheWe adopted this new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016as of January 1, 2017, and should be applied it prospectively. EarlyThe adoption is permitted. We are evaluating theof this guidance did not have a material impact if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

        Business CombinationsRecent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

        Revenue recognition

                In September 2015,May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16,new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. The new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminate all industry-specific guidance, providing a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for us beginning with the first quarter of 2018. We are adopting the accounting standard using the modified retrospective method, which recognizes the cumulative effect upon adoption as an adjustment to retained earnings at the adoption date. We will report our adoption in our Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2018.

                The most significant impacts of the new revenue recognition standard are expected to be:

                We estimate that the cumulative effect of adopting this standard will result in an adjustment to retained earnings at the adoption date of approximately $60 million to $100 million, inclusive of the associated tax impacts. Additionally, we expect that the new disclosure requirements will require us to design and implement additional internal controls over financial reporting, and we are in process of adjusting our processes and internal controls in preparation for adopting the new standard.

        Leases

                In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to business combinations.the accounting for leases. The new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic. The new standard, among other things, requires a lessee to classify a lease as either an operating or financing lease, and lessees will need to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for their leases. The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. The asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment for initial direct costs, lease incentives received, and any prepaid lease payments. Operating leases will result in a straight-line expense pattern, while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

        accounting. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and will require application of the cumulativenew guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented, with certain transition practical expedients available to provide relief in adopting the new standard. We are evaluating the impact of athis new accounting guidance on our financial statements. Currently, we do not plan to early adopt this new standard but we do expect to elect and apply the available transition practical expedients upon adoption.

        Financial Instruments

                In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related to the recognition and measurement period adjustment, includingof financial assets and financial liabilities. The new standard, among other things, generally requires companies to measure investments in other entities, except those accounted for under the impact on prior periods, made to provisional amounts recordedequity method, at the acquisition date as a result of the business combination, be recognizedfair value and recognize any changes in the reporting period the adjustment is identified.fair value in net income. The new standard also requires separate presentation onsimplifies the faceimpairment assessment of the income statement, or disclosure in the notes, of the portion of the amount recorded in current period earnings by line item. Prior to the issuance of the standard, such adjustments to provisional amounts were recognized retrospectively.equity investments without readily determinable fair values. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 20152017, and the guidance should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity investments without readily determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustmentsequity investments that occur afterexist as of the effective date. Early adoption is permitted. The adoptiondate of adoption. Based on our current financial instruments held, we do not anticipate this new accounting guidance couldwill have a material impact on our financial statements in future periods upon occurrence of a measurement period adjustment.statements.

        Deferred TaxesStatement of Cash Flows—Restricted Cash

                In November 2015,2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, providing new guidance related to simplify the presentationclassification of deferred taxes.restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The new standard requires that deferred tax assetsa statement of cash flows explain any change during the period in total cash, cash equivalents, and liabilities, alongrestricted cash. Therefore, restricted cash will be included with any related valuation allowance, be classified as non-current"Cash and cash equivalents" when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the balance sheet. The issuancestatement of the new standard eliminates the requirement to perform the jurisdiction analysis based on the classifications of the underlying assets and liabilities, and as a result, each jurisdiction will only have one net non-current deferred tax asset or liability.cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 20162018, and canshould be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

                AsWe are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements. We expect there will be a significant impact to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 weand 2016, as those years include, as an investing activity, the $3.6 billion movement in restricted cash as a result of transferring cash into escrow at December 31, 2015 to facilitate the King Acquisition and the subsequent release of that cash in 2016 in connection with the King Acquisition. Under this new standard, the restricted cash balance will be included in the beginning and ending total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balances and hence would not be included as an investing activity in the statement of cash flows.

        Goodwill

                In January 2017, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if any entity forgoes a Step 0 test, an entity will be required to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit, as


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        21. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

        determined in Step 1 from the goodwill impairment test, with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge, if any, for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The effect of adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

        Derivatives and Hedging

                In August 2017, the FASB issued new guidance related to the accounting for derivatives and hedging. The new guidance expands and refines hedge accounting for both financial and non-financial risk components, aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of hedging instruments and hedged items in the financial statements, and includes certain targeted improvements to ease the application of current guidance related to the assessment of a hedge's effectiveness. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. If early adopted, ASU No. 2015-17 andthe new standard must generally be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. As a result, we reclassified $368 million of deferred tax assets from current "Deferred income taxes, net" resulting in non-current net deferred tax assets and liabilities of $264 million and $10 million, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014. The adoptionthe beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We are evaluating the impact of this new accounting guidance didon our financial statements and related disclosures. We expect, based on our current outstanding derivative instruments, the new guidance will not have a material impact on our compliance with debt covenant requirements.financial statements.

        22. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

         
         For the Quarters Ended 
         
         December 31,
        2015
         September 30,
        2015
         June 30,
        2015
         March 31,
        2015
         
         
         (Amounts in millions, except per share data)
         

        Net revenues

         $1,353 $990 $1,044 $1,278 

        Cost of sales

          538  337  297  413 

        Operating income

          250  196  332  542 

        Net income

          159  127  212  394 

        Basic earnings per share

          0.22  0.17  0.29  0.54 

        Diluted earnings per share

          0.21  0.17  0.29  0.53 
         
         For the Quarters Ended 
         
         December 31,
        2017
         September 30,
        2017
         June 30,
        2017
         March 31,
        2017
         
         
         (Amounts in millions, except per share data)
         

        Net revenues

         $2,043 $1,618 $1,631 $1,726 

        Cost of revenues

          803  552  561  585 

        Operating income

          221  257  339  493 

        Net income (loss)

          (584) 188  243  426 

        Basic earnings (loss) per common share

          (0.77) 0.25  0.32  0.57 

        Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

          (0.77) 0.25  0.32  0.56 

        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        22. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Continued)


         
         For the Quarters Ended 
         
         December 31,
        2014
         September 30,
        2014
         June 30,
        2014
         March 31,
        2014
         
         
         (Amounts in millions, except per share data)
         

        Net revenues

         $1,575 $753 $970 $1,111 

        Cost of sales

          631  253  300  342 

        Operating income

          438  8  310  427 

        Net income (loss)

          361  (23) 204  293 

        Basic earnings (loss) per share

          0.49  (0.03) 0.28  0.40 

        Diluted earnings (loss) per share

          0.49  (0.03) 0.28  0.40 
         
         For the Quarters Ended 
         
         December 31,
        2016
         September 30,
        2016
         June 30,
        2016
         March 31,
        2016
         
         
         (Amounts in millions, except per share data)
         

        Net revenues

         $2,014 $1,568 $1,570 $1,455 

        Cost of revenues

          776  529  598  491 

        Operating income

          425  294  232  461 

        Net income(1)

          254  199  151  363 

        Basic earnings per common share(1)

          0.34  0.27  0.20  0.49 

        Diluted earnings per common share(1)

          0.33  0.26  0.20  0.48 

        23. Acquisitions

        Major League Gaming

                On December 22, 2015,


        (1)
        During the third quarter of 2016, we acquiredearly adopted an accounting standard which simplifies the business of Major League Gaming, Inc.accounting for an aggregate purchase price of $46 million in cash. MLG is a leader in creatingshare-based payments. The standard, among other things, requires all excess tax benefits and streaming premium live gaming events, organizing professional competitions and running competitive gaming leagues. MLG's business will operate under our Media Networks operating segment.

                We identified and recorded the assets acquired at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, and allocated the remaining value of $12 million to goodwill. The goodwill recorded is expectedtax deficiencies to be recorded as an income tax deductible for tax purposes.expense or benefit in the consolidated statement of operations. The primary intangible asset acquired relates to the developed technology. The values assigned to the acquired assets were preliminary estimates of fair value available asadoption of the datestandard impacted our previously reported results for the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and March 31, 2016. As a result of the adoption of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,standard, our net income, basic earnings per common share, and may be adjusted as further information becomes available during the measurement period of up to 12 months from the date of the acquisition. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized due to information that may become available subsequently include any changes in these fair values which could potentially result in adjustments to goodwill. The individual tangiblediluted earnings per common share increased by $24 million, $0.03, and intangible assets acquired in the acquisition were immaterial to the Company's consolidated financial statements. We did not assume any significant liabilities as part of the acquisition.

                The following net assets were recognized resulting from the acquisitions:

         
         December 22,
        2015
         

        Net tangible assets

         $1 

        Definite-lived intangible assets

          33 

        Goodwill

          12 

        Total net assets recognized

         $46 

                Pro forma financial information has not been presented as the acquisition did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for 2015.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        24. Subsequent Events

        The King Acquisition

                On November 2, 2015, we and King entered into a Transaction Agreement under the terms of which we would acquire King and King would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. On February 23, 2016 we completed the King Acquisition under the terms of the Transaction Agreement. We transferred $5.9 billion in consideration to the existing King shareholders and share-based award holders.

                The Company made this acquisition because it believes that the addition of King's highly-complementary mobile business will position the Company as a global leader in interactive entertainment across mobile, console and PC platforms, and positions the company for future growth. The combined company has a world-class interactive entertainment portfolio of top-performing franchises.

                As the closing of the King Acquisition occurred subsequent to December 31, 2015, our financial results as of and$0.03, respectively, for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2015 do not contain the results of King.

                The purchase price, including replacement share awards, is made up of the net assets acquired, including tangible assets, trademark, franchises, developed technology, other intangibles, and goodwill. A portion of the goodwill associated with this purchase is expected to be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes. Due to the timing of the close of the King Acquisition, we did not have sufficient time to complete the valuation of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, and therefore, the purchase price allocation and amount of goodwill and the tax deduction cannot be determined at this time. Additionally, supplemental pro forma information has not been provided for King as due to the timing of the closing of the King Acquisition, compilation of such data is impracticable.

        Credit Facilities

                Tranche A Term Loan    In connection with the closing of the King Acquisition, the Company was provided with incremental term loans, in the form of Tranche A Term Loans, in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.3 billion, of which the proceeds were used to fund the King Acquisition.

                The Tranche A Term Loans are scheduled to mature on October 11, 2020 and bear interest, at the Company's option, at either (a) a base rate equal to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate, plus 0.5%, (ii) the prime commercial lending rate of Bank of America, N.A. and (iii) the LIBOR for an interest period of one month beginning on such day plus 1.00%, or (b) LIBOR, in each case, plus an applicable interest margin. LIBOR is subject to a floor of 0% and the base rate is subject to an effective floor of 1.00%. The applicable interest margin for Tranche A Term Loans ranges from 1.50% to 2.25% for LIBOR borrowings and from 0.50% to 1.25% for base rate borrowings and is determined by reference to a pricing grid based on the Company's Consolidated Total Net Debt Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement).

                The Tranche A Term Loans require quarterly principal payments of 0.625% of the stated principal amount of the Tranche A Term Loans, with increases to 1.250% starting on June 30, 20192016, and 3.125% starting on June 30, 2020, with$27 million, $0.04, and $0.03, respectively, for the remaining balance payable on the Tranche A Term Loans' scheduled maturity date of October 11, 2020. Voluntary prepayments of the Tranche A Term Loans are permitted at any time, in minimum principal amounts, without premium or penalty.


        Table of Contents


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

        24. Subsequent Events (Continued)

                The Tranche A Term Loans are subject to a financial maintenance covenant requiring the Company to maintain a maximum Consolidated Total Net Debt Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 4.00 to 1.00, which will decrease to 3.50 to 1.00 (I) after the sixth full fiscal quarter after the Tranche A Term Loans are made or (II) if the Collateral Suspension occurs prior to the date falling 18 months after the Tranche A Term Loans are made, on the later of (x) the last day of the fourth full fiscal quarter after the Tranche A Term Loans are made and (y) the last day of the fiscal quarter in which the Collateral Suspension occurs.

                The Tranche A Term Loans are secured by the same collateral and guaranteed by the same guarantors that secure and guarantee the existing Term Loans. The other terms of the Tranche A Term Loans are also generally the same as the terms of the existing Term Loan.

                Revolving Credit Facility    As part of the Amendments, upon the closing of the King Acquisition, the Company's existing revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement (as in effect prior to the closing of the King Acquisition) in an aggregate principal amount of $250 million was replaced with a new revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement in the same aggregate principal amount (the "2015 Revolving Credit Facility").

                Borrowings under the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed by the Company and are available for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Up to $50 million of the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility may be used for letters of credit.

                The 2015 Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on October 11, 2020. Borrowings under the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company's option, under the same terms as the Tranche A Term Loans. Additionally, the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility is subject to the same financial maintenance covenant and is secured by the same collateral and guaranteed by the same guarantors that secure and guarantee the Tranche A Term Loans. The other terms of the 2015 Revolving Credit Facility are generally the same as the terms of the Revolver.

        Debt Repayments

                On February 2, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized repayments of up to $1.5 billion of our outstanding debt duringended March 31, 2016. On February 25, 2016, we made a voluntary principal repayment of $500 million on our Term Loan, reducing the aggregate term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement, which includes the $2.3 billion of Tranche A Term Loans, to $3.7 billion. Since this repayment was not a contractual requirement and was not authorized by the Board of Directors until February 2016, we did not reflect the repayment as a "Current portion of long-term debt" in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.


        Table of Contents


        SCHEDULE II


        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

        (Amounts in millions)

        Col. A Description
         Col. B
        Balance at
        Beginning of
        Period
         Col. C
        Additions(A)
         Col. D
        Deductions(B)
         Col. E
        Balance at End
        of Period
          Col. B
        Balance at
        Beginning of
        Period
         Col. C
        Additions(A)
         Col. D
        Deductions(B)
         Col. E
        Balance at End
        of Period
         

        At December 31, 2017

                 

        Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances

         $257 $83 $(66)$274 

        Allowance for doubtful accounts

         4 1  5 

        At December 31, 2016

                 

        Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances

         $339 $119 $(201)$257 

        Allowance for doubtful accounts

         4 2 (2) 4 

        At December 31, 2015

                          

        Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances

         $379 $114 $(154)$339  $379 $114 $(154)$339 

        Allowance for doubtful accounts

         4 1 (1) 4  4 1 (1) 4 

        At December 31, 2014

                 

        Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances

         $376 $212 $(209)$379 

        Allowance for doubtful accounts

         5 2 (3) 4 

        At December 31, 2013

                 

        Allowances for sales returns and price protection and other allowances

         $323 $174 $(121)$376 

        Allowance for doubtful accounts

         9 1 (5) 5 

        (A)
        Includes increases and reversals of allowances for sales returns, price protection, and doubtful accounts due to normal reserving terms.

        (B)
        Includes actual write-offs and utilization of allowances for sales returns, price protection and uncollectible accounts receivable, net of recoveries, and foreign currency translation and other adjustments.

        Table of Contents


        EXHIBIT INDEX

                Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Company has filed certain agreements as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other party or parties to such agreements and (i) may have been qualified by disclosures made to such other party or parties, (ii) were made only as of the date of such agreements or such other date(s) as may be specified in such agreements and are subject to more recent developments, which may not be fully reflected in the Company's public disclosure, (iii) may reflect the allocation of risk among the parties to such agreements and (iv) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors. Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the Company's actual state of affairs at the date hereof and should not be relied upon.

        Exhibit Number Exhibit
         2.13.1 Transaction Agreement, dated November 2, 2015, by and among King Digital Entertainment plc, ABS Partners C.V. and Activision Blizzard, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2015).


        2.2


        Appendix I to the Rule 2.5 Announcement (Conditions Appendix) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2015).


        2.3


        Expenses Reimbursement Agreement, dated November 2, 2015, by and between King Digital Entertainment plc and Activision Blizzard, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2015).


        2.4


        Form of Voting Undertaking executed by certain shareholders of King Digital Entertainment plc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2015).


        3.1


        Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Activision Blizzard, Inc., dated June 5, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed June 6, 2014).

         

        3.2

         

        ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company,Activision Blizzard, Inc., adopted as of February 2, 20161, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed February 8, 2016)7, 2018).

         

        4.1

         

        Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2013, among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed September 19, 2013).


        4.2


        Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed September 19, 2016).


        4.3


        Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2017, between Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2017).


        4.4


        Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2017, between Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2017).


        4.5


        Form of certificate for the Company's 2.600% Notes due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2017).


        4.6


        Form of certificate for the Company's 3.400% Notes due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2017).


        4.7


        Form of certificate for the Company's 4.500% Notes due 2047 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2017).

         

        10.1*

         

        Activision, Inc. 1999 Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002).


        10.2*


        Amendment, dated as of September 14, 2006, to the 1999 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 8-K filed September 20, 2006).


        10.3*


        Activision, Inc. 2001 Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002).


        10.4*


        Amendment, dated as of September 14, 2006, to the 2001 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Form 8-K filed September 20, 2006).


        10.5*


        Activision, Inc. 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003).

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit NumberExhibit
        10.6*Amendment, dated as of September 14, 2006, to the 2002 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Form 8-K filed September 20, 2006).


        10.7*


        Activision, Inc. 2002 Studio Employee Retention Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Form S-8, Registration No. 333-103323 filed February 19, 2003).


        10.8*


        Amendment, dated as of September 14, 2006, to the 2002 Studio Employee Retention Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's Form 8-K filed September 20, 2006).


        10.9*


        Activision, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).


        10.10*


        Amendment, dated as of September 14, 2006, to the 2003 Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's Form 8-K filed September 20, 2006).


        10.11*


        Activision, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-146431, filed October 1, 2007).

         

        10.12*10.2*

         

        Activision Blizzard, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed June 12, 2012).


        10.13*


        Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014).


        10.14*


        Form of Stock Option Certificate for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 1999 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 31, 2005).


        10.15*


        Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2001 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 31, 2005).


        10.16*


        Form of Executive Stock Option Agreement for grants to Robert A. Kotick or Brian G. Kelly pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (effective as of July 26, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005).


        10.17*


        Form of Non-Executive Stock Option Agreement for grants to persons other than Robert A. Kotick or Brian G. Kelly and non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (effective as of July 26, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005).


        10.18*


        Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement for grants to non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 13, 2007) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007).

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit Number Exhibit
         10.19*10.3* Form of Notice of Share Option Award for grants to non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 20032014 Incentive Plan, (effectiveamended and restated as of June 13, 2007)March 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1910.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2017).


        10.4*


        Activision Blizzard, Inc. KDE Equity Incentive Plan, amended as of November 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended MarchDecember 31, 2007)2016).


        10.20*


        Form of Notice of Share Option Award for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 13, 2007) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007).

         

        10.21*10.5*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007).


        10.22*


        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Award for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007).


        10.23*


        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants to non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).

         

        10.24*10.6*

         

        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision,  Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September September��30, 2008).

         

        10.25*10.7*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to independent directors upon their initial election to the board or upon their tenth continuous year of service on the board pursuant to the Activision,  Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).


        10.26*


        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to independent directors upon their re-election to the board (other than in connection with 10 years of continuous service) pursuant to the Activision,  Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).


        10.27*


        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to officers pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).

         

        10.28*10.8*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to persons other than officers or directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).

         

        10.29*10.9*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Award for grants to persons other than non-employee directors pursuant to the Activision, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).


        10.10*

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit NumberExhibit
        10.30*Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants to unaffiliated directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).

         

        10.31*10.11*

         

        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants to persons other than directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard,  Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).

         

        10.32*10.12*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to unaffiliated directors upon their initial election to the board or upon their tenth continuous year of service on the board pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).


        10.33*


        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to affiliated non-employee directors and to unaffiliated directors upon their re-election to the board (other than in connection with 10 years of continuous service) pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).


        10.34*


        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to persons other than directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).

         

        10.35*10.13*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Award for grants to persons other than directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard,  Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).

         

        10.36*10.14*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants under the Company's 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).

        Table of Contents


        Table of Contents

        Exhibit NumberExhibit
        10.41*Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to affiliated non-employee directors and to unaffiliated directors upon their re-election to the board (other than in connection with 10 years of continuous service) pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 12, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Form 8-K filed May 8,10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).

         

        10.42*10.19*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to persons other than directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of March 6, 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's Form 8-K filed May 8,10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).

         

        10.43*10.20*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Award for grants to persons other than directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard,  Inc. 2008 Incentive Plan (effective as of March 6, 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Form 8-K filed May 8,10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).

         

        10.44*10.21*

         

        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 5, 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).

         

        10.45*10.22*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to persons other than non-affiliated directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 5, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).

         

        10.46*10.23*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to non-affiliated directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 5, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).


        10.47*


        Form of Notice of Performance-Vesting Restricted Share Unit Award for grants pursuant to the Activision Blizzard,  Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 5, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).

         

        10.48*10.24*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Award for grants pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of June 5, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).

         

        10.49*10.25*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to persons other than non-affiliated directors pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of July 29, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).

        Table of Contents


        Table of Contents

        10.28*

        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants to U.S. employees pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 1, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016).



        10.29*


        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants to non-U.S. employees pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 1, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit Number10.45 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016).
        Exhibit

         
        10.52*
        10.30*

         

        Form of Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award for grants to non-U.S. employees pursuant to the Activision Blizzard,  Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of November 1, 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016).


        10.31*


        Form of Notice of Stock Option Award for grants pursuant to the Activision Blizzard, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of March 2, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017).


        10.32*


        Form of Notice of Performance-Vesting Restricted Share Unit Award for grants pursuant to the Activision Blizzard,  Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan (effective as of March 2, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017).


        10.33*


        Amended and Restated CEO Recognition Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014).

         

        10.53*10.34*

         

        2015Activision Blizzard, Inc. Corporate Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015).

         

        10.54*10.35*

         

        Employment Agreement, dated September 9, 2005,May 5, 2017, between Thomas Tippl and Activision Publishing, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).


        10.55*


        Amendment, dated as of December 15, 2008, to Employment Agreement between Thomas Tippl and Activision Publishing, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).


        10.56*


        Amendment, dated as of April 15, 2009, to Employment Agreement between Thomas Tippl and Activision Publishing, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009).


        10.57*


        Amendment, dated as of March 23, 2010, to Employment Agreement between Thomas Tippl and Activision Blizzard, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010).


        10.58*


        Letter Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2012, between the Company and Thomas Tippl (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed March 16, 2012).


        10.59*


        Amendment, dated as of December 5, 2013, to Employment Agreement between Thomas Tippl and Activision Blizzard, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).


        10.60*


        Stock Option Agreement, dated October 3, 2005, between Thomas Tippl and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).


        10.61*


        Addendum to Stock Option Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2006, between Thomas Tippl and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).


        10.62*


        Restricted Stock Agreement, dated October 3, 2005, between Thomas Tippl and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005)8-K, filed May 11, 2017).

         

        10.63*10.36*

         

        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of May 10, 2010, to Thomas Tippl (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).


        10.64*


        Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award, dated as of February 10, 2014, to Thomas Tippl (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.68 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).


        10.65*


        EmploymentTransition Agreement, dated June 30, 2012, between Brian G. Kelly and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).


        10.66*


        Letter Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2012,November 22, 2016, between the Company and Brian G. Kelly (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1010.56 of the Company's Form 10-Q10-K for the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 2012)2016).


        10.37*


        Employment Agreement, dated May 10, 2017, between Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Dennis Durkin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed May 11, 2017).


        10.38*


        Employment Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2016, between Robert A. Kotick and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 25, 2016).

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit Number Exhibit
         10.67*10.39* Form of Notice of Performance Share Unit Award to Robert A. Kotick (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 25, 2016).


        10.40*


        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of August 7, 2017, to Robert A. Kotick (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017).


        10.41*


        Form of Notice of Performance Share Unit Award Regarding Operating Income to Robert A. Kotick (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017).


        10.42*


        Form of Notice of Performance Share Unit Award Regarding Relative Total Shareholder Return to Robert A. Kotick (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017).


        10.43*


        Service Agreement, dated May 22, 2000,November 2, 2015, between Brian G. KellyRiccardo Zacconi and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000)March 31, 2017).


        10.68*


        Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award to Brian G. Kelly, dated as of July 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).

         

        10.69*10.44*

         

        Notice of StockIndividual Option Award,and Subscription Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2015 to Brian G. KellyJanuary 31, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015).


        10.70*


        Employment Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007, between Michael Morhaime and Vivendi Games, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).


        10.71*


        Assignment and Assumption of Morhaime Employment Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2008, between Vivendi Games. Inc. and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).


        10.72*


        Amendment, dated as of December 15, 2008, to Employment Agreement between Michael Morhaime and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.94 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).


        10.73*


        Amendment, dated as of March 31, 2009, to Employment Agreement between Michael Morhaime and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.5 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)2017).

         

        10.74*10.45*

         

        Amendment,Option Exchange/Supplemental Subscription Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2009, to Employment Agreement between Michael Morhaime and the CompanyMarch 21, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.92 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).


        10.75*


        Amendment, dated as of October 26, 2010, to Employment Agreement between Michael Morhaime and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.86 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).


        10.76*


        Notice of Stock Option Award to Michael Morhaime, dated as of July 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2310.6 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)March 31, 2017).

         

        10.77*10.46*

         

        Notice of StockShare Option Award,Grant, dated as of November 8, 2010,February 16, 2015, to Michael MorhaimeRiccardo Zacconi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9010.7 of the Company's Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2010)2017).

         

        10.78*10.47*

         

        Notice of Restricted ShareStock Unit Award, dated as of February 16, 2015, to Riccardo Zacconi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017).


        10.48*


        Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award, dated as of November 8, 2010,10, 2015, to Michael MorhaimeRiccardo Zacconi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9110.9 of the Company's Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2010)2017).

         

        10.79*10.49*

         

        Notice of Stock Option Award,Employment Agreement, dated as of NovemberMay 10, 2011, to Michael Morhaime2017, between Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Collister Johnson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9410.1 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011)8-K, filed May 11, 2017).

         

        10.80*10.50*

         

        Notice of Stock Option Award,Employment Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2012, to Michael MorhaimeMay 5, 2017, between Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Spencer Neumann (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10810.2 of the Company's Form 10-K8-K, filed May 11, 2017).


        10.51*†


        King Profit Sharing Plan, effective as of February 23, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2012)2017).

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit Number Exhibit
         10.81*10.52 Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of November 15, 2013, to Michael Morhaime (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.107 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).


        10.82*


        Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award, dated as of November 15, 2013, to Michael Morhaime (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.108 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).


        10.83*


        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of November 14 2014, to Michael Morhaime (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).


        10.84*


        Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award, dated as of November 14 2014, to Michael Morhaime (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).


        10.85*


        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of November 13, 2015, to Michael Morhaime.


        10.86*


        Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award, dated as of November 13, 2015, to Michael Morhaime.


        10.87*


        Employment Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2012, between Humam Sakhnini and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).


        10.88*


        Amendment, dated as of October 30, 2014, to Employment Agreement between Humam Sakhnini and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).


        10.89*


        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of March 6, 2012, to Humam Sakhnini (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).


        10.90*


        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of November 14, 2014, to Humam Sakhnini (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).


        10.91*


        Employment Agreement, dated February 29, 2012, between Dennis Durkin and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).


        10.92*


        Notice of Stock Option Award, dated as of March 6, 2012, to Dennis Durkin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).


        10.93*


        Notice of Restricted Share Unit Award, dated as of March 6, 2012, to Dennis Durkin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).


        10.94*


        Employment Agreement, dated March 15, 2012, between Robert A. Kotick and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).


        10.95*


        Stock Option Agreement, dated May 22, 2000, between Robert A. Kotick and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit NumberExhibit
        10.96*Notice of Stock Option Award to Robert A. Kotick, dated December 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.71 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008).


        10.97


        Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2008, among the Company, Vivendi Holding I Corp., Vivendi Games, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed July 15, 2008).


        10.98


        ASAC Stockholders Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, among the Company, ASAC and, for the limited purposes set forth in the ASAC Stockholders Agreement, Mr. Kotick and Mr. Kelly (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed October 18, 2013).


        10.99


        Amendment, dated May 28, 2015, to the ASAC Stockholders Agreement among the Company, ASAC and, for the limited purposes set forth therein, Mr. Kotick and Mr. Kelly (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Form 8-K filed June 2, 2015).


        10.100


        Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, among the Company, as borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, a group of lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as syndication agent, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Goldman Sachs & Co., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Mistubishi UFJ Securities (USA), Inc., Mizuho Securities USA Inc., RBC Capital Markets, SunTrust Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.210.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed October 18, 2013).

         

        10.10110.53

         

        First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the several other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2015).

         

        10.10210.54

         

        Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the several other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed November 17, 2015).

         

        10.10310.55

         

        Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the several other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's form 8-K, filed December 14, 2015).

         

        10.10410.56

         

        SecurityFourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and among Activision Blizzard, Inc., as borrower, the other grantors identified therein andguarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, forand the secured partiesseveral other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.310.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed October 18, 2013)April 1, 2016).

         

        10.105*10.57

         

        Fifth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the several other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed August 24, 2016).


        10.58


        Sixth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2013, by and among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the several other agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed February 6, 2017).


        10.59


        Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2016, among Activision Blizzard, Inc., the guarantors named therein and the representatives of the initial purchasers of the Notes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed September 19, 2016).


        10.60*


        Non-Affiliated Director Compensation Program and Stock Ownership Guidelines, as amended and restated as of July 28th, 2015November 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.90 of the Company's Form 10-Q10-K for the periodyear ended June 30, 2015)December 31, 2016).

        Table of Contents

        Exhibit Number Exhibit
         10.10621.1 Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement, dated as of December 19, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K, filed December 29, 2014).


        21.1


        Subsidiaries of the Company.

         

        23.1

         

        Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).

         

        24.1

         

        Power of Attorney of each Executive Officer and Director signing this report (included in the signature page hereto).

         

        31.1

         

        Certification of Robert A. Kotick pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        31.2

         

        Certification of Dennis DurkinSpencer Neumann pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        32.1

         

        Certification of Robert A. Kotick pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        32.2

         

        Certification of Dennis DurkinSpencer Neumann pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        101.INS

         

        XBRL Instance Document.

         

        101.SCH

         

        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

         

        101.CAL

         

        XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

         

        101.LAB

         

        XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

         

        101.PRE

         

        XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

         

        101.DEF

         

        XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document.

        *
        Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which a director or executive officer of the Company participates.

        Confidential treatment requested as to portions of the exhibit. Confidential materials omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        Table of Contents

        SIGNATURE

                Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Activision Blizzard, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

        Date: February 27, 2018

        ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.

        By:


        /s/ ROBERT A. KOTICK

        Robert A. Kotick
        Director and Chief Executive Officer of Activision Blizzard, Inc.
        (Principal Executive Officer)





        POWER OF ATTORNEY

                Each individual whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert A. Kotick, and Spencer Neumann and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of substitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his, her or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done or by virtue hereof.

                Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

        By:/s/ ROBERT A. KOTICK

        (Robert A. Kotick)
        Director,
        Chief Executive Officer, and
        Principal Executive Officer
        February 27, 2018

        By:


        /s/ SPENCER NEUMANN


        (Spencer Neumann)



        Chief Financial Officer and
        Principal Financial Officer



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ STEPHEN WEREB


        (Stephen Wereb)



        Deputy Chief Financial Officer,
        Chief Accounting Officer, and
        Principal Accounting Officer



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ REVETA BOWERS


        (Reveta Bowers)



        Director



        February 27, 2018


        Table of Contents

        By:

        /s/ ROBERT J. CORTI


        (Robert J. Corti)

        Director

        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ BRIAN G. KELLY


        (Brian G. Kelly)



        Chairman and Director



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ HENDRIK J. HARTONG III


        (Hendrik J. Hartong III)



        Director



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ BARRY MEYER


        (Barry Meyer)



        Director



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ ROBERT J. MORGADO


        (Robert J. Morgado)



        Director



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ PETER NOLAN


        (Peter Nolan)



        Director



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ CASEY WASSERMAN


        (Casey Wasserman)



        Director



        February 27, 2018


        By:


        /s/ ELAINE P. WYNN


        (Elaine P. Wynn)



        Director



        February 27, 2018