Use these links to rapidly review the document

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ý


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-35518
or

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-35518

or

o


TRANSMISSION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                           TO                          

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                                    TO                                   
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

20-2590184

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

  20-2590184

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1550 East Gude Drive,

9715 Key West Avenue 
RockvilleMD
20850
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)


 

(zip code)

(301)
 838-2500

(Registrant's telephone number,

including area code)


 

20850
(zip code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

TITLE OF EACH CLASS:Outstanding at February 13, 2020Trading Symbol
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON
WHICH
REGISTERED:
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value52,533,973SUPN The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso    No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes oNoý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesý    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer",filer," "accelerated filer"filer," "smaller reporting company," and "smaller reporting"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerý

Accelerated filer 
 Accelerated
Non-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting company 
 Non-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reportingEmerging growth companyo

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o    No ý

As of June 30, 2016,2019, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price of the common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market was $966,994,822.

        The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of March 9, 2017 was 50,162,496.

$1,677,874,611.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the registrant's 20162019 fiscal year end, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents


SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page

PART I

Item 1.

 

Business

4Page
PART I

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

25

Item 1B.

1.

Item 2.

53

Properties

56

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

PART II

Item 5.

Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

Item 9B.

Other Information

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

 

 

SIGNATURES

118

Table of Contents

Unless the content requires otherwise, the words "Supernus," "we," "our" and "the Company" refer to Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiary.

We are the owners of various U.S. federal trademark registrations(®) and registration applications(™applications(TM), including the following marks referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to applicable U.S. intellectual property laws: "Supernus®," "Oxtellar XR®," "Trokendi XR®," "Microtrol®," "Solutrol®," and the registered Supernus Pharmaceuticals logo.

All other trademarks or trade names referred to in this prospectusAnnual Report are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are referred to without the ® andTM symbols, but such references should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto.


Table of Contents


PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933, that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements convey our current expectations or forecasts of future events. All statements contained in this Annual Report other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, plans and objectives of management for future operations. The words "may," "continue," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "will," "believe," "project," "expect," "seek," "anticipate," "should," "could," "would," "potential," or the negative of those terms and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. All of these forward-looking statements are based on information available to us at this time, and we assume no obligation to update any of these statements. Actual results could differ from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those identified in the "Business," "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" sections and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We urge you to review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report, and those detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that attempt to advise you of the risks and factors that may affect our future results.

ITEM 1.     BUSINESS.

Overview

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware, and commenced operations in 2005. The Company became publicly traded in 2012 and is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol SUPN. Our principal executive offices are located in Rockville, Maryland.
We are a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases. In 2013, we launched Oxtellar XR (extended-release oxcarbazepine)diseases in neurology and Trokendi XR (extended-release topiramate), our two novel treatments for patients with epilepsy. In addition, we are developing multiple product candidates in psychiatry to address significant unmet medical needs and market opportunities for the treatment of impulsive aggression (IA) and for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We are initially developing SPN-810 (molindone hydrochloride) to treat IA in patients who have ADHD. We subsequently plan to develop SPN-810 for the treatment of IA in other CNS diseases, such as autism, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and some forms of dementia. There are currently no approved products indicated for the treatment of IA. We are developing SPN-812 (viloxazine hydrochloride) as a candidate to treat patients who have ADHD.

psychiatry. Our extensive expertise in product development has been built over the past 25 years: initially as a standaloneprivately-held stand-alone development organization,organization; then, as a U.S.United States (U.S.) subsidiary of Shire plcPlc (Shire, a subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.); and upon our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Shire Laboratories Inc. in late 2005, as Supernus Pharmaceuticals.

Products and Product Candidates
The table below summarizes our current portfolio of novel products and product candidates.
currentporfolioa04.jpg

*Prophylaxis of migraine headache in adults and adolescents.
**Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA)

We currently market ourtwo products, in the United States through our own specialty sales force and have and will continue to seek strategic collaborations with other pharmaceutical companies to license our products outside the United States.

Our neurology portfolio consists of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR whichin the U.S. Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR are the first once-daily extended release oxcarbazepine and topiramate products respectively, indicated for the treatment of epilepsy in the U.S. market. TheseIn April 2017, we launched Trokendi XR for the prophylaxis of migraine headache in adults and adolescents. In January 2019, we launched Oxtellar XR for monotherapy treatment of partial onset epilepsy seizures in adults and in children 6 to 17 years of age. We market our products are differentiated, comparedthrough our own sales force in the U.S. and seek strategic collaborations with other pharmaceutical companies to their immediate release counterpartcommercialize our products by offering convenient once-daily dosing and unique pharmacokinetic profiles. We believe that a once-daily dosing regimen improves compliance which in turn reducesoutside of the frequency of seizures. We also believe that the unique smooth and steady pharmacokinetic profiles of once-daily dosing mitigate the blood level fluctuations typically associated with immediate release products, which can result in adverse events (AEs) or decreased efficacy.

U.S.

Table of Contents

Our net product revenuessales of $210.1$383.4 million in 20162019 were driven by strongcontinued growth in prescriptions for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. Total prescriptions as reported by Intercontinental Marketing Services (IMS) have shown a steady increase year over yearXR, as shown in the following graph.graph:

prescriptions.jpg


Source: IMS Monthly Prescriptions

IQVIA

As of year-end 2016, our products2019, Trokendi XR represented approximately 5% of the topiramate market, and Oxtellar XR represented approximately 3% of the large and growing base ofoxcarbazepine market. Total annual prescriptions for the topiramate and oxcarbazepine (total annual prescriptions for topiramate market and oxcarbazepine market is 14.3markets are approximately 13.4 million and 4.54.7 million, respectively). respectively.
We expectare also developing multiple proprietary CNS product candidates to continueaddress significant unmet medical needs and market opportunities. We are developing SPN-812 (viloxazine hydrochloride) as a novel, non-stimulant product candidate to grow our revenues for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR for the foreseeable future by continuing to drive penetration in these markets. We believe these products have the potential to achieve combined peak net sales in excess of $500 million annually.

Oxtellar XR is indicated for add-on, adjunctive or concomitant therapy of partial seizures in adults and intreat children 6 years to 17 years of age. Trokendi XR is indicated for initial monotherapy in patients 6 years of age and older with partial onset or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and as add-on therapy in patients 6 years of age and older with partial onset or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures or with seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

In August 2016, we received tentative approval to expand the label for Trokendi XR to include the indication of prophylaxis of migraine headaches in adults.who have ADHD. We continue to prepare and will be readyexpect to launch SPN-812, assuming FDA approval, in the migraine indication soon after receiving fullfourth quarter of 2020. Additionally, we initiated a Phase III ADHD program to study SPN-812 in adults during the third quarter of 2019.

Furthermore, we are developing SPN-604 (extended release oxcarbazepine) for the treatment of bipolar disorder. We initiated a pivotal Phase III monotherapy trial in the fourth quarter of 2019. We expect enrollment in this study to continue through 2021. If approved, SPN-604 would represent the first approval fromfor the treatment of bipolar disorder with oxcarbazepine in the U.S. Food
Following our acquisition of Biscayne Neurotherapeutics, Inc. in 2018, we are currently developing SPN-817 to treat severe pediatric epilepsy disorders.
We expect to incur significant research and Drug Administration (FDA).development expenses related to the continued development of each of our product candidates through FDA approval or until the program terminates. We incurred total research and development expenses of $69.1 million, $89.2 million and $49.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Assuming we obtain FDA approval for the product candidates currently in our portfolio, we anticipate receiving this approval duringcreating a sales force to market our products to the second quarterrelevant population of 2017.

Regarding SPN-810, we initiated two Phase III clinical trials in 2015 (P301psychiatrists and P302) that will continue to enroll patients through 2017. Our Phase III clinical trial (P301) is being conducted under a Special Protocol Agreement (SPA). SPN-810 has been granted fast-track designation by the FDA.

We completed a Phase IIb dose ranging trial for SPN-812 and announced topline results in 2016. The trial met the primary endpoint, demonstrating that SPN-812 at daily doses of 400 mg, 300 mg, and 200 mg achieved a statistically significant improvement in the symptoms of ADHD when compared to placebo. All SPN-812 doses tested in the trial were well tolerated. Of the patients treated with SPN-812, only 6.7% discontinued due to an AE. In addition, 87% of patients who completed the trial elected to enroll in the ongoing open-label extension. Based on these positive results, we plan to have an end-of-Phase II meeting with the FDA after which we will initiate Phase III clinical testing during the second half of 2017.

care physicians.


We have a successful track record of developing and launching novel products by applying proprietary formulation technologies to known drugs to improve their side effect profile or to improve patient compliance. In addition, we have developed new indications for existing therapies and expand the treatment to new indications.


Table of Contents

therapies. Our key proprietary technology platforms include: Microtrol, Solutrol and EnSoTrol. These technologies have been utilized to create nineten marketed products, includingincluding: Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR,XR; Adderall XR (developed for Shire),; Intuniv (developed for Shire),; Mydayis (developed for Shire); and Orenitram (developed for United Therapeutics Corporation); as well as our key product candidates SPN-810 andcandidate SPN-812.

Products and Product Candidates

The table below summarizes our current portfolio of novel products and product candidates.

ProductIndicationStatus
Oxtellar XREpilepsyLaunched in 2013
Trokendi XREpilepsyLaunched in 2013
Adult Migraine ProphylaxisTentative Approval
SPN-810IA*Phase III
SPN-812ADHDPhase IIb
SPN-809DepressionPhase II ready

*
Initial program is in patients with ADHD, with plansWe continue to follow on in other indications, such as IA in patients with autism, PTSD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and some forms of dementia.

We are continuing to expandbuild our intellectual property portfolio to provide additional protection for our technologies, products and product candidates.

We currently have seven U.S. patents issued covering Oxtellar XRexpect to incur significant expenses as we: invest in research and eight U.S. patents issued covering Trokendi XR, providing patent protection expiring no earlier than 2027development related to the continued development of each of our product candidates through FDA approval or until the program terminates; expand product indications for each product.

approved products; invest in sales and marketing resources for existing and new products; enter into agreements to purchase products or other companies; and invest in support of our business, technology, regulatory and intellectual property portfolio.

Our Strategy

Our vision is to bebecome a leading specialty pharmaceutical company, developing and commercializing new medicines for treatment of CNS diseases in neurology and psychiatry. Key elements of our strategy to achieve this vision are to:

    Drive growth and profitability.  We will continue to drive the prescription growth of Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR by continuing to dedicate sales and marketing resources in the United States.

    Advance our pipeline toward commercialization.  We initiated the Phase III clinical trials for SPN-810, a novel treatment for IA in patients who have ADHD, during the third quarter of 2015. We completed a Phase IIb dose ranging study for SPN-812 during 2016 and expect to initiate Phase III clinical testing during the second half of 2017.

    Target strategic business development opportunities.  We are actively exploring a broad range of strategic opportunities that fit well with our strong presence in CNS. These include: in-licensing products and entering into co-promotion partnerships which are synergistic with our sales force call point for our marketed products and product candidates; co-development partnerships for our pipeline products; and growth opportunities through value-creating and transformative merger and acquisition transactions, including both commercial stage and development stage products.

    Continue to grow our pipeline.  We plan to continue to evaluate and develop additional CNS product candidates that we believe have significant commercial potential through our internal research and development efforts.

Drive growth and profitability.  We will continue to drive the prescription growth of Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, by continuing to dedicate sales and marketing resources in the U.S.
Advance our pipeline toward commercialization.  In January 2020, the FDA accepted the NDA for SPN-812 for the treatment of ADHD in pediatric patients. We initiated a Phase III trial for the treatment of ADHD in adult patients with SPN-812 in the third quarter of 2019. We also initiated a Phase III trial for SPN-604 for the treatment of bipolar disorder in adults in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Pursue strategic business development opportunities.  We are actively exploring a broad range of strategic opportunities that fit well with our strong presence in CNS, while also exploring other disease areas that are driven by specialty physicians, including orphan or rare diseases. These strategic options include: in-licensing products and/or entering into development collaborations leading to commercialization rights; opportunities that leverage and/or expand our sales force call points for our marketed products and product candidates; co-development partnerships outside the U.S. for our pipeline products; and growth opportunities through value-creating and transformative merger and acquisition transactions, including both commercial stage and development stage products.
Continue to grow our pipeline.  Through our internal research and development efforts, we plan to continue to evaluate and develop additional CNS product candidates that we believe have significant commercial potential.
Our Neurology Portfolio

Our neurology portfolio includes two commercial products and one product candidate for the treatment of neurological diseases:
Trokendi XR, a once-daily extended release topiramate product for the prophylaxis of migraine headache and for the treatment of epilepsy;
Oxtellar XR, and Trokendi XR are the firsta once-daily extended release oxcarbazepine product that was initially approved for adjunctive treatment of partial onset epilepsy seizures. During January 2019, we launched Oxtellar XR for the monotherapy treatment of partial onset epilepsy seizures in adults and topiramate products indicated for patientsin children 6 to 17 years of age; and
SPN-817, a novel synthetic form of huperzine A, whose mechanism of action (MOA) includes potent acetyl cholinesterase inhibition, with epilepsypharmacological activities in the U.S. market. These products differ from the

CNS conditions such as epilepsy.

Table of Contents

immediate release products by offering once-daily dosing and unique pharmacokinetic profiles which we believe can have very positive clinical effects for many patients. We believe a once-daily dosing regimen improves adherence, making it more probable that patients maintain sufficient levels of medication in their bloodstreams to protect against seizures. In addition, we believe that the unique smooth and steady pharmacokinetic profiles of our once-daily formulations reduce the peak to trough blood level fluctuations that are typically associated with immediate release products and may result in increased AEs, more side effects and decreased efficacy.

Epilepsy Overview

Epilepsy is a complex neurological disorder characterized by spontaneous recurrence of unprovoked seizures, which are sudden surges of electrical activity in the brain that impair a person's mental and/or physical abilities.


Compliance with drug treatment regimens is critically important to achieving effective control for patients with epilepsy. Non-compliance with anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy is a serious issue and remains the most common cause of breakthrough seizures for patients. Not only is taking all prescribed doses critical to control breakthrough seizures, but the timing of when patients take their prescribed doses can also be crucial.

We believe extended release products, and in particular Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, may offer important advantages in the treatment of epilepsy. The release profiles of extended release products can produce more consistent and steadier plasma concentrations as compared to immediate release products, potentially resulting in fewer side effects, better tolerability, fewer emergency room visits, improved efficacy and fewer breakthrough seizures. Extended release products may help patients improve adherence and, consequently, help patients enjoy a better quality of life.
In addition, when considering treatment regimens for patients with epilepsy, neurologists and epileptologists take into consideration the MOA of the different anti-epileptics that are available. By combining several different MOAs, it is sometimes possible to get significantly better seizure control. We recently acquired SPN-817, an antiepileptic, which we believe has an MOA that is different from that of other products, and can therefore potentially represent a unique additional treatment alternative.
Migraine Overview
Approximately 39 million individuals in the U.S. are affected by migraine. The World Health Organization categorizes migraine as one of the most disabling medical illnesses worldwide.
Migraine is a painful complex neurological disorder, consisting of recurring, painful attacks that can significantly disrupt time with loved ones, education and careers. Migraine headaches are often characterized by throbbing pain, extreme sensitivity to light or sound and, potentially, nausea and vomiting.
As in epilepsy, we believe extended release products, and in particular Trokendi XR, may offer important advantages for treatment of migraine. The release profiles of extended release products can produce more consistent and steadier plasma concentrations as compared to immediate release products, potentially resulting in fewer side effects, better tolerability, fewer emergency room visits and improved efficacy. Improved tolerabilityExtended release products may help patients improve adherence, have fewer breakthrough seizuresmigraines and, correspondingly,consequently, help patients enjoy a better quality of life.

Commercial Products
Trokendi XR

Trokendi XR is the firstindicated for: initial monotherapy in patients 6 years of age and older with partial onset or primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures; as add-on therapy in patients 6 years of age and older with partial onset or PGTC seizures or with seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; and for prophylaxis of migraine headache in adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older. Trokendi XR's once-daily extended release topiramate product indicated for patients with epilepsy in the U.S. market, anddosing is designed to improve patient adherence over the current immediate release products, which must be taken multiple times per day. We believe a once-daily dosing regimen improves compliance, making it more probable that patients take their medication and maintain sufficient levels of medication in their bloodstreams. Trokendi XR's unique smooth pharmacokinetic profile results in lower peak plasma concentrations, higher trough plasma concentrations, and slower plasma uptake rates. This results in smoother and more consistent plasma concentrations than immediate release topiramate formulations can deliver.formulations. We believe that such a profile mitigates blood level fluctuations that are frequently associated with many side effects, as well as mitigatingthereby reducing the likelihood of breakthrough seizures or migraine headaches that patients can suffer when taking immediate release products. Side effects associated with immediate release products may lead patients to skip doses, which could place them at higher risk for breakthrough seizures.

In August 2016, we received tentative approval to expand the label for Trokendi XR to include the indication of prophylaxis ofseizures or migraine headache in adults. We continue to prepare and will be ready to launch the adult migraine indication soon after receiving full FDA approval, which we anticipate will occur during the second quarter of 2017.

headaches.

Oxtellar XR

Oxtellar XR is the only once-daily extended release oxcarbazepine product indicated for adjunctive treatmentas therapy of patients with epilepsypartial onset seizures in the U.S.adults and in children 6 years to 17 years of age. With its novel pharmacokinetic profile showing lower peak plasma concentrations, a slower rate of plasma input, and smoother and more consistent blood levels as compared to immediate release products, we believe Oxtellar XR improves the tolerability of oxcarbazepine and thereby reduces side effects. In addition, Oxtellar XR once-per-day dosing is designed to improve patient adherencecompliance compared to the current immediate release products that must be taken multiple times per day.


Table of Contents

Sales and Marketing

We

Product Candidates
SPN-817 (huperzine A)
SPN-817 will have established a commercial organizationnew chemical entity status (NCE) in the U.S. market. We expect to support currenthave significant intellectual property (IP) protecting this product candidate through our own research and future sales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. We believe our current sales force of over 150 sales representatives is effectively targeting healthcare providers, primarily neurologists, to support and grow our epilepsy franchise. Simultaneously promoting two epilepsy products allows us to leverage our commercial infrastructure with these prescribers. Assuming we receive FDA approvaldevelopment efforts, as well as through in-licensed IP. SPN-817 represents a novel MOA for the prophylaxis of migraine in adults, we may expand the sales force dependingan anticonvulsant. Development will initially focus on the prescription uptake post launch.

Assuming we obtain FDA approvaldrug's anticonvulsant activity, which has been shown in preclinical models for treatment of partial seizures and Dravet Syndrome. SPN-817 is in clinical development, and has received an Orphan Drug designation for Dravet Syndrome from the product candidatesFDA.

SPN-817 Development Program
We plan on studying SPN-817 initially in our pipeline, we anticipate adding sales representatives to market our productssevere pediatric epilepsy disorders. A Phase I proof-of-concept trial is currently underway in adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures, studying the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of a new extended release formulation of non-synthetic huperzine A. The Company initiated an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, enabling preclinical activities in the U.S.
We will focus on completing and optimizing the synthesis process of the synthetic drug and developing a novel dosage form. Given the potency of huperzine A, a novel extended release oral dosage form is critical to the relevant populationsuccess of physicians, primarily psychiatrists.

this program, because initial studies with immediate release formulations of non-synthetic huperzine A have shown dose-limiting serious side effects.

Manufacturing

We currently depend on third-party commercial manufacturing organizations (CMOs) for all manufacturing operations, including production of raw materials, dosage form product and product packaging. This encompasses productproducts for commercial use, as well as productsome products for preclinical research and clinical trials.

research. We currently employ internal resources to manage our manufacturing contractors.

We have entered into agreements with leading CMOs headquartered in North America, including Patheon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), Packaging Coordinators, Inc.Inc; and Catalent Pharma Solutions, for the manufacture and packaging of the final commercial products Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR.XR, as well as for our pipeline candidate, SPN-812. These CMOs offer a comprehensive range of contract manufacturing and packaging services. Commercial products as well as our product candidates are single sourced from single third-party suppliers.

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of any of our product candidates beyond that used in Phase II clinical trials, nor do we have plans to develop our own manufacturing operations for Phase III clinical materials or commercial products in the foreseeable future.
Sales and Marketing
We currently employ internal resourceshave a commercial sales and marketing organization in the U.S. to managesupport sales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. We believe our manufacturing contractors.

current sales force of over 200 sales representatives is effectively targeting healthcare providers, primarily neurologists, to support and grow our epilepsy and migraine product franchise. Simultaneously promoting two neurology products allows us to leverage our commercial infrastructure and gain efficiencies in operations.

Epilepsy Competition

Trokendi XR competes with all immediate release and extended release topiramate products, including Topamax, Qudexy XR and their related generic products. Oxtellar XR competes with all immediate release oxcarbazepine products, including Trileptal and its related generic products. Both Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR compete with other anti-epileptic products, both branded and generic.
Migraine Competition
Trokendi XR competes with all immediate release and extended release topiramate products, including Topamax, Qudexy XR and their related generic products, as well as other anti-epileptic products. Oxtellar XR competes with all immediate release oxcarbazepine products including Trileptalused for the prevention of migraine headaches. Most notably, this includes a new class of products introduced in 2018, anti-CGRPs (calcitonin gene related peptide); Botox; beta-blockers; valproic acid; and its related generic products as well as other anti-epileptic products.

amitriptyline.


Our Psychiatry Portfolio

Our psychiatry portfolio includes three product candidates for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Thedisorders:
SPN-812, the most advanced product candidate, SPN-810, has fast track statusis a novel non-stimulant product being developed for the treatment of ADHD. In January 2020, the FDA accepted the review of the NDA for SPN-812 for the treatment of children and is expected to be the first product approved for IA. SPN-812adolescents with ADHD and assigned a PDUFA target action date of November 8, 2020;
SPN-809, employwhich employs the same active ingredient as in SPN-812, is Phase II ready and areis in development for the treatment of depression; and
SPN-604 is being developed for ADHD and depression, respectively. SPN-812 recently completed athe treatment of bipolar disorder. A Phase IIbIII clinical trial and SPN-809 is Phase II ready.

IA Overview

Our market research shows that, for adolescents and children, child psychiatrists, psychiatrists, child neurologists, and high prescribing pediatricians write approximately 40%was initiated during the fourth quarter of their ADHD prescriptions, representing approximately 13 million prescriptions. By 2020, we project that this group of physicians will collectively write approximately 16 million prescriptions for ADHD medication. Of these 16 million ADHD prescriptions, roughly one-third will be written for patients with IA or with IA and other comorbidities.

2019.

Table of Contents

IA is not limited to individuals with ADHD. We believe IA occurs in patients with other CNS disorders, including autism, Alzheimer's, bipolar disorder, PTSD, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and intermittent explosive disorder. Market research we have conducted indicates that the prevalence of IA in autistic children and adolescents is approximately 45%, and the prevalence of IA in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder is approximately 60%.

ADHD Overview

ADHD is a common CNS disorder characterized by developmentally inappropriate levels of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. ADHD affects an estimated 6% to 9% of all school-age children, and an estimated 3% to 5% of adults in the United States(1).U.S.(1) An estimated 50% of children with ADHD continue to meet criteria for ADHD into adolescence(2)adolescence(2). The ADHD market is projected to grow at 5% annually, to approximately 78 million prescriptions by 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2016, according to data from IMS, the U.S. market for ADHD prescription drugs was $11.0 billion.

Diagnosis of ADHD requires a comprehensive clinical evaluation based on identifying patients who exhibit the core symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Although many children may be inattentive, hyperactive or impulsive, the level of severity and degree of functional impairment, as well as considerations ofas to what may be behind the underlying symptoms, determine which children meet the diagnosis and therefore should be treated for ADHD.

Current Treatments

Non-stimulant treatments for IAADHD accounted for about 8% of the total ADHD prescriptions in Patientsthe U.S. in 2018, with stimulants constituting approximately 92% of ADHD

Currently, there prescriptions. The ADHD market is projected to grow approximately 4% annually, from approximately 75 million prescriptions in 2019 to approximately 78 million prescriptions by 2020. According to data from IQVIA, the U.S. market for ADHD prescription drugs was $8.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Bipolar Disorder Overview
Bipolar disorder is a mental disorder that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration and the ability to carry out day-to-day tasks. There are no approved medicationsthree main types of bipolar disorder; bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder and cyclothymic disorder. 12 month prevalence of bipolar disorder in the U.S. is 2.8% and lifetime prevalence is 4.4%(3). Based on our market research we believe that bipolar I to bipolar II prevalence is 7:3.
A psychiatrist or other mental health professional diagnoses bipolar disorder based on the symptoms, lifetime course, and experiences of the individual. Physicians primarily treat with combination therapies containing mood stabilizers. According to data from IQVIA, for the year ended December 31, 2019, 56 million prescriptions were written in the U.S. for bipolar disorder.
Product Candidates
SPN-812 (viloxazine hydrochloride)

SPN-812 is a serotonin norepinephrine modulating agent (SNMA), which we are developing as a novel non-stimulant for the treatment of IA. IA is characteristic of individuals who spontaneously react more strongly than normalADHD. SPN-812 has the potential to stimuli by committing verbal or physical acts against other people, property, or themselves. Based on our discussions with medical experts, the current treatment options for IA in patients with ADHD include psychosocial interventions, such as school-based or family-based behavioral therapies, which are usually not wholly effective. In the large, multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD(3), a seminal clinical trial designed by experts from key stakeholder communities such as the National Institute of Mental Health, researchers observed that after 14 months of either ADHD medication-only or a regimen that combined ADHD medication with behavioral interventions, 44% of those children with ADHD (or 26% of the total sample sizeaddress an $8.5 billion market opportunity in the trial) who initially exhibited aggression still had what canU.S. We believe SPN-812 could be describedwell-differentiated as IAcompared to other non-stimulant treatments due to its different pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profile. The active ingredient in SPN-812, viloxazine hydrochloride, has an extensive safety record in Europe, where it was previously marketed for many years as an antidepressant, albeit at much higher dosage levels. Viloxazine hydrochloride is a structurally distinct, bicyclic, SNMA with NCE status in the end of the trial. This demonstrates that psychosocial interventions may not work for a large percentage of children with ADHD who exhibit aggressive behaviors.

In response, doctors have also tried to treat this group with off-label use of prescription medicines, such as mood stabilizers, stimulants and anti-psychotic drugs. Results have varied, but anti-psychotic drugs appear to have the best therapeutic potential. Unfortunately, many of these agents are associated with adverse effects including obesity, dyskinesia, lipid abnormalities, marked increases in prolactin, and increase in diabetes, which is of particular concern when treating pediatric populations.

SPN-810 (molindone hydrochloride)

We are developing SPN-810 (molindone hydrochloride) as a novel treatment for IA in patients who have ADHD and who are being treated with standard ADHD medication. During 2014, the FDA


U.S.

(1)
Dopheide, J.A.,Attention-Deficit- Hyperactivity Disorder: An Update, published June 2009 inPharmacotherapy.

(2)
Floet, A.M.W.,Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, published February 2010 inPediatrics in Review.

(3)
The MTA Cooperative Group,A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder, published December 1999 inArchives of General Psychiatry
(4)    Harvard Medical School, 2007. National Comorbidity Survey (NSC). (2017, August 21).

Table

The FDA accepted the review of Contents

granted fast track designationthe NDA for SPN-810SPN-812 for the treatment of IA inchildren and adolescents with ADHD in patients being treated with standard ADHD medication. The fast track designation allows for more frequent interactions with theJanuary 2020 and assigned a PDUFA target action date of November 8, 2020. We plan to launch it, pending FDA for the early submission of some sections of the marketing application, and carries the potential for an expedited review category for the New Drug Application (NDA). Currently, we and the FDA have a SPA for the conduct of our Phase III program for SPN-810, using an agreed upon novel scale to measure IA that was developed by us. We initiated two Phase III clinical trials in 2015 (P301 and P302) that continue to enroll patients in 2017.

Molindone hydrochloride was previously marketedapproval, in the United States as an anti-psychoticfourth quarter of 2020. We expect SPN-812, if approved, to treat schizophrenia under the trade name Moban, albeit at much higher dosages (50 to 225mg/day) than we are using in our development program (18 and 36 mg/day). Moban has not been commercially available since 2010 and the FDA has confirmed that the withdrawal from thehave five-year market was notexclusivity due to issues with safety or efficacy. Molindone hydrochloride is differentiated from other anti-psychoticsits NCE status in that it is less likely to be associated with weight gain and, in preclinical models, has not caused increases in prolactin levels as seen with other anti-psychotic drugs.

In addition, we believe the lower doses tested for the proposed indication of IA in ADHD should be better tolerated than the higher doses approved to treat schizophrenia. The Phase IIb trial with SPN-810, which included 121 patients, showed that there was no difference in weight gain between patients treated with SPN-810 and those treated with placebo. Although initiallyU.S. Furthermore, we are developing SPN-810 as a novel treatment for IA in patients who have ADHD, if we are successful in demonstrating the effectiveness of SPN-810 in ADHD, we may then develop the product as a candidate for treating other indications; e.g., patients with IA in autism, PTSD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and some forms of dementia. In the aggregate, we believe the addressable market for SPN-810 is greater than $6.3 billion, including $3.2 billion in ADHD, $0.8 billion in autism and $2.3 billion in PTSD.

We are developing an intellectual property position aroundIP covering the novel synthesis process for the active ingredient in SPN-812, its novel use in IA,ADHD and its novel formulations. Patents, if issued, could expireextended release delivery system.

SPN-812 Development Program
The Phase III pivotal program consisted of four three-arm, placebo-controlled trials: P301 and P303 trials in patients 6 to 11 years old; and P302 and P304 trials in patients 12 to 17 years old. We announced positive topline results from 2029 to 2033. the pediatric trials (P301 and P303) and the first adolescent trial (P302) in December 2018. Results of the second adolescent Phase III trial (P304) were released in March of 2019.
We have one patent issued eachinitiated a Phase III program in adults in the U.S., Mexico, Australia and Japan, covering modified release formulationsthird quarter of molindone hydrochloride. In another patent family, covering2019.
Refer to the novel process of synthesisCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for the results of the active ingredient, we have two patents issuedpreviously completed Phase IIb trials.
Results of P301 and P303 Phase III trials
Both studies were randomized, double‑blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, parallel group clinical trials in children 6 to 11 years of age who are diagnosed with ADHD. After titration, each treatment was administered orally once a day over five weeks in study P301, and over seven weeks in study P302. A total of 477 patients were randomized in the U.S. InP301 study, across placebo and two doses (100mg; 200mg), and a third patent family, covering usetotal of molindone hydrochloride313 patients were randomized in treating IA, we have one patent issuedthe P303 study, across placebo and two doses (200mg; 400mg). The primary objective of both studies was to assess the efficacy of SPN‑812 in Japan. We own allreducing the symptoms of ADHD in children. The primary outcome measure was the change, from baseline to the end of the pending applications.

SPN-810 Development Program

study, in the ADHD Rating Scale (RS‑5) total score. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring: adverse events (AEs); clinical laboratory tests; vital signs; electrocardiograms (ECGs); suicidality; and physical examinations. Patients who completed the study were offered the opportunity to continue into an open‑label phase, that is currently on‑going.

On December 6, 2018, we announced positive topline results from the P301 and P303 Phase III studies of SPN‑812, having successfully met the primary endpoint. At daily doses of 100 mg and 200 mg in study P301, and at daily doses of 200mg and 400mg in study P303, statistically significant improvement in the symptoms of ADHD, from baseline to end of study, as measured by the ADHD‑RS‑5, was achieved. Patients receiving SPN‑812 100 mg and 200 mg had a −16.6 point change (p=0.0004) and a−17.7 point change (p<0.0001) from baseline, respectively, in the primary endpoint, vs. a −10.9 point change for placebo at week 6. This primary result, based on Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis in the Intent‑To‑Treat (ITT) population, was confirmed by sensitivity analyses using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) (100 mg, p=0.0008; 200 mg, p<0.0001). All SPN‑812 doses tested in the trials were well tolerated.
The study demonstrated fast onset of action, reaching statistical significance for 100 mg and 200 mg doses as early as week 1, with p‑ values of 0.0004 and 0.0244, respectively. Statistical significance was maintained on a weekly basis through the end of the trial at week 6. In 2012,addition, at the end of the study, SPN‑812 100 mg and 200 mg reached statistical significance compared to placebo on the hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention subscales of the ADHD‑RS‑5, scale with p‑ values ranging from <0.0001 to 0.0026. Finally, SPN‑812 100 mg and 200 mg met all secondary endpoints, including the important analysis of the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI‑I) secondary endpoint, with p‑ values of 0.002 and <0.0001, respectively, compared to placebo.
At the end of the P303 Study, SPN‑812 200 mg and 400 mg doses reached statistical significance, as compared to placebo, in the primary endpoint. Patients receiving 200 mg and 400 mg had a −17.6 point change (p=0.0038) and a −17.5 point change (p=0.0063) from baseline to end of study, respectively, in the primary endpoint vs. a −11.7 point change for placebo at week 8. This primary result, based on MMRM analysis in the ITT population, was confirmed by sensitivity analyses using ANCOVA (200 mg, p=0.0058; 400 mg, p<0.0121).
Onset of action for SPN‑812 showed clear differences compared to placebo starting by week 1, reaching statistical significance at week 5, which was sustained through the rest of the trial.

As with the P301 study, at the end of the P303 study, SPN‑812 200 mg and 400 mg reached statistical significance compared to placebo on the hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention subscales of the ADHD‑RS‑5, scale with p‑ values ranging from 0.0020 to 0.0248. In addition, 200 mg and 400 mg met the CGI‑I secondary endpoint, with p‑ values of 0.0028 and 0.0099, respectively, compared to placebo.
Overall, both trials exhibited favorable tolerability and safety profiles, with low incidence of AEs across all doses. AEs were mild, leading to low discontinuation rates due to AEs, ranging from 2.2% to 4.8%. Treatment related AEs that reported at more than or equal to 5% included somnolence, headache, decreased appetite, fatigue and upper abdominal pain.
Results of P302 Phase III trial
On December 20, 2018, we completedannounced positive topline results from the P302 Phase III study of SPN‑812 in patients 12 to 17 years old for the treatment of ADHD. The trial was successful in meeting the primary endpoint, demonstrating that SPN‑812 at daily doses of 200 mg and 400 mg achieved statistically significant improvement in the symptoms of ADHD, from baseline to end of study, as measured by the ADHD‑RS‑5. Each of the SPN‑812 doses tested in the trials was well tolerated.
The study was a Phase IIbrandomized, double‑blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlledparallel group clinical trial, in the United States in pediatric subjects 6adolescents 12 to 1217 years of age diagnosed with ADHDADHD. Each treatment was administered orally once a day over six weeks, including the titration phase of the 400 mg dose group.
A total of 310 patients were randomized across placebo and with IA that is not controlled by optimal stimulant and behavioral therapy.two doses of SPN-812 (200 mg/400 mg). The primary objective of the study was to assess the effect of SPN-810SPN‑812 in reducing IA as measured by the Retrospective-Modified Overt Aggression Scale (R-MOAS) after at least three weekssymptoms of treatment. Secondary endpoints includedADHD in adolescents 12 to 17 years old. The primary outcome measure was the rate of remission of IA and measurementchange, from baseline to the end of the effectiveness of SPN-810 onstudy, in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and ADHD scales as well as evaluation of the safetyADHD‑RS‑5 total score. Safety and tolerability of SPN‑812 were assessed by the drug.monitoring of: AEs; clinical laboratory tests; vital signs; ECGs; suicidality; and physical examinations. Patients who completed the study were offered the opportunity to continue into an open‑label phase, currently on‑going.
At the end of the P302 Study, 200 mg and 400 mg doses reached statistical significance, as compared to placebo, for the primary endpoint. Patients receiving 200 mg and 400 mg had a −16.0 point change (p=0.0232) and a −16.5 point change (p=0.0091) from baseline, respectively, in the primary endpoint, vs. a −11.4 point change for placebo, at week 6. This primary result, based on MMRM analysis in the ITT population, was confirmed by sensitivity analyses using ANCOVA (200 mg, p=0.0163; 400 mg, p=0.0055).
The study demonstrated fast onset of action, reaching statistical significance for the 400 mg dose as early as week 1, with a p‑value of 0.0085, and maintaining statistical significance on a weekly basis through the end of the trial at week 6. Onset of action for the 200 mg dose showed clear difference compared to placebo starting by week 1, reaching statistical significance at week 3. This difference was sustained through the rest of the trial.
As with the P301 and P303 studies, at the end of the P302 study, 200 mg and 400 mg doses reached statistical significance compared to placebo on the hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention subscales of the ADHD‑RS‑5 scale, with p‑values ranging from 0.0005 to 0.0424. In addition, 200 mg and 400 mg doses met the CGI‑I secondary endpoint, with p‑values of 0.0042 and 0.0003, respectively, compared to placebo.
Overall, the trial exhibited favorable tolerability and safety profiles, with low incidence of AEs across all doses. AEs were mild, leading to low discontinuation rates due to AEs, ranging from 1.9% to 4.1%. Treatment related AEs that reported at more than or equal to 5% for SPN‑812 included somnolence, fatigue, decreased appetite, headache and nausea.
Results of P304 Phase III trial
On March 28, 2019, we announced topline results from the P304 Phase III study of SPN-812, in patients 12 to 17 years old for the treatment of ADHD.
The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, parallel group clinical trial in adolescents 12 to 17 years of age, diagnosed with ADHD. Each treatment was administered orally once a day over seven weeks, including one week of titration for 400 mg and two weeks of titration for 600 mg.

A total of 297 patients were randomized across placebo and two doses of SPN-812 (400 mg/600 mg). The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of SPN-812 in reducing the symptoms of ADHD, in adolescents 12 to 17 years old. The primary outcome measure was the change, from baseline to the end of the study, in the ADHD-RS-5 total score tested on the 600 mg followed by the 400 mg in the statistical plan. Safety and tolerability of SPN-812 were assessed by the monitoring of: AEs; clinical laboratory tests; vital signs; ECGs; suicidality; and physical examinations. Patients who completed the study were offered the opportunity to continue into an open-label phase, of six months duration.


Table of Contents

Analysis of treatment was performed using both parametric and non-parametric statistical methods. The parametric method assumes that data are normally distributed. Under this method, mean results of each treatment group at the end of three weeks of treatment were compared to the baseline R-MOAS score for each of the four dose groups (high, medium, low and placebo) using the t-test. The non-parametric method does not assume that data are normally distributed. Under this method, the median results of the change in R-MOAS score from baseline at the end of three weeks of treatment were computed for each of the four dose groups (high, medium, low and placebo). These were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank-sum test. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the median of each of the treatment groups: high, medium, and low versus placebo at the end of three weeks of treatment. The change in score from baseline to visit 10 was used as the outcome variable. There was a statistically significant difference between the low dose and placebo (p=0.031) and also between the medium dose and placebo (p=0.024) at thea=0.05 level. There was no statistically significant difference between the high dose and placebo. Both the medium dose and low dose were superior to placebo. These results convinced us that both low and medium doses were effective. This range of doses is being further evaluated in Phase III clinical trials.

A secondary efficacy variable was the proportion of children whose impulsive aggressive behavior remitted, with remission defined as R-MOAS£ 10 at the end of the study. Low and medium doses of SPN-810 showed statistically significant results versus placebo, with percent of patients who experienced remission of impulsive aggressive behavior of 51.9% (p=0.009) and 40.0% (p=0.043), respectively.

The CGI results (Severity and Improvement) are consistent with the findings on the R-MOAS scale, in that notable improvement (reduction in severity) occurred primarily in the low dose and medium dose groups. Scores on SNAP-IV Hyperactivity and Impulsivity items did not exhibit statistically significant differences across treatment groups, indicating that efficacy against IA was specific, rather than being efficacious against the underlying ADHD. Numerical trends in SNAP-IV Oppositional Defiant Disorder scores, while not always significant, consistently favored the low dose and medium dose groups over placebo.

SPN-810 was well tolerated throughout the study across all doses. Sedation was the most frequently reported adverse reaction, with two subjects (7%) reporting this event in each of the four treatment groups, including the placebo group. The next most frequently reported adverse reaction was increased appetite with two subjects (7%) reporting this event in each of the three active treatment groups and one subject (3%) in the placebo group.

The two serious AEs that occurred were not drug-related. One patient in the low dose arm and two patients in the medium dose arm had severe AEs that were considered either possibly or definitely related to the drug. Six patients in total discontinued the study because of AEs in the active treatment arms: one in low dose; two in medium dose; and three in high dose. AEs requiring dose reduction were infrequent.

The frequency of AEs associated with extra-pyramidal symptoms was also low and the events were reversible. The data are too sparse to evaluate dose-related aspects of these reports; thus, no clear dose-response relationship can be assessed. SPN-810 exhibited a very good safety and tolerability profile, with low incidence of AEs, and no unexpected, life threatening, or dose-limiting safety issues.

SPN-812 (viloxazine hydrochloride)

ADHD affects 6% to 9% of all school-age children and 3% to 5% of all adults. Current non-stimulant treatments for ADHD account for about 8% of the total ADHD prescriptions in the U.S. As a novel non-stimulant, SPN-812 has the potential to address a $2.5 billion market opportunity for the treatment of ADHD with non-stimulants. SPN-812, a norepinepherine reuptake inhibitor, would provide an additional option to the few non-stimulant therapies currently available. We believe that SPN-812 could be more effective than other non-stimulant therapies due to its different pharmacological profile.

on-going.

Table of Contents

We expect SPN-812, if approved, to have five year market exclusivity, given its new chemical entity (NCE) status in the U.S. We are developing an intellectual property position around the novel synthesis process for the active ingredient, its novel use in ADHD and its novel extended release delivery.

Our SPN-812 product candidate has three families of pending U.S. non-provisional and foreign counterpart patent applications. Patents, if issued, could expire from 2029 to 2033. We have one patent issued in Europe and one in Canada in one of these families, covering a method of treating ADHD using viloxazine hydrochloride. In another family, covering the novel process of active ingredient synthesis, we have two patents issued in the U.S. and one patent issued each in Europe, Mexico, and Australia. We have one patent issued in the U.S. covering modified release formulations of viloxazine. We own all of the pending applications.

SPN-812 Development Program

We are developing SPN-812 as a novel non-stimulant treatment for ADHD. During 2016, we completed a Phase IIb dose ranging trial and announced topline results. The trial met the primary endpoint, demonstrating that SPN-812 at daily doses of 400 mg, 300 mg, and 200 mg achieved a statistically significant improvement in the symptoms of ADHD when compared to placebo. All SPN-812 doses tested in the trial were well tolerated. Of the patients treated with SPN-812, only 6.7% discontinued due to an AE. In addition, 87% of patients who completed the trial elected to enroll in the ongoing open-label extension.

At the end of the study (EOS), SPN-812 study, 400 mg 300 mg and 200 mg doses were statistically significantreached statistical significance as compared to placebo, in meetingfor the primary endpoint. With respect to the primary endpoint, patientsPatients receiving SPN-812 400 mg 300 mg and 200 mg had a –19.0 pointan -18.3 Least Squares (LS) Mean change (p=0.021), –18.6 point change (p=0.027) and a –18.4 point change (p=0.031) from baseline respectively, as compared to –10.5(p=0.0082) vs. LS Mean change of-13.2 from baseline for placebo.

The treatment groupsplacebo at week 7. SPN-812 400600 mg 300 mg and 200 mg showed a standardized mean effect sizedid not reach statistical significance with an LS Mean change of 0.63, 0.60 and 0.55 compared to placebo, respectively. Patients receiving SPN-812 100 mg had 16.7average mean change-16.7 (p=0.0712) from baseline in the primary endpoint at week 7. The result, based on MMRM analysis in the ITT population, was consistent with the results from sensitivity analyses using ANCOVA (400 mg, p=0.0191; 600 mg, p=0.1002) at week 7 (EOS), with placebo based imputation for missing data.

At the 400 mg dose, SPN-812 demonstrated statistically significant onset of action starting week 2 (p=0.0063), which continued to the end of the study at week 7 (p=0.0082). At the 600 mg dose, SPN-812 demonstrated statistically significant difference from placebo in the primary endpoint during the last week of titration (week 2, dosed at 400 mg, p=0.0456) and a standardized mean effect sizethe first week of 0.46maintenance (week 3, dosed at 600 mg, p=0.0238).
As with the first three studies (P301, P302 and P303), at the end of the P304 study, the 400 mg dose reached statistical significance compared to placebo whichon the hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention subscales of the ADHD-RS-5 scale, with p-values of 0.0484 and 0.0042, respectively. In addition, the SPN-812 400 mg dose met the CGII secondary endpoint, with a p-value of 0.0051 compared to placebo.
While the 600 mg dose did not quite reach statistical significance, (p=0.089)it was not required for the submission or approvability of the NDA for children and adolescents. It was included to assess a potentially higher level of efficacy, to identify the maximum effective dose and to help in this relativelydesigning our trials for the adult population.
Overall, the trial exhibited both favorable tolerability and a favorable safety profile, consistent with the other Phase III trials, with low numberincidence of patients.

In addition,AEs across all doses. AEs were mild leading to low discontinuation rates, ranging from 4.0% to 5.1%. Treatment related AEs that reported at more than or equal to 5% for SPN-812 400were somnolence, fatigue, decreased appetite, headache and nausea.

With the completion of the P304 study, we now have a robust clinical data package in more than 1,000 children and adolescent patients, across all three doses of SPN-812: 100 mg, 300200 mg and 200 mg met the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) secondary endpoint with p- values of 0.014, 0.015 and 0.031, as respectively, compared400 mg. We submitted an NDA to placebo.

Based on these positive results in children with ADHD and the positive Phase IIa results in adults with ADHD, Supernus plans to have an end-of-Phase II meeting with the FDA after which it plansin November 2019, and received acceptance of the filing in January 2020. The FDA has assigned a PDUFA target action date of November 8, 2020. We expect to initiate Phase III clinical testing duringlaunch SPN-812, assuming FDA approval, in the second halffourth quarter of 2017.

2020.

SPN-809 (viloxazine hydrochloride)

SPN-809 is a novel once-daily product candidate for the treatment of depression. SPN-809 is based onincorporates the same active ingredient as SPN-812. We currently have an open investigational new drug application (IND)IND for SPN-809 as a treatment offor depression, the indication for which the active ingredient in SPN-809 was approved and marketed in Europe for many years. ItThe active ingredient was never approved in the U.S.

for this indication.

Because SPN-809 contains the same active ingredient as SPN-812, we expect that many of our activities related to the development of SPN-812 will also benefit the development of SPN-809.

SPN-604 (extended release oxcarbazepine for bipolar)
SPN-604 is a novel once-daily product candidate for the treatment of bipolar. It includes the active ingredient oxcarbazepine which has the well-known MOA of a sodium channel blocker. This MOA has been proven to treat bipolar through several products that are currently approved by the FDA and are on the market for such use. In addition, a significant portion of the current oxcarbazepine market is to treat psychiatric disorders such as bipolar despite the fact that the drug has never been approved by the FDA for such use.
We initiated a Phase III program for the treatment of bipolar disorder in the fourth quarter of 2019. This program will likely include a monotherapy trial and an adjunctive trial. The monotherapy Phase III clinical trial was initiated during the fourth quarter of 2019.

If approved, SPN-604 would represent the first approval for the treatment of bipolar disorder with oxcarbazepine in the U.S.
ADHD Competition

Competition in the U.S. ADHD market has increased with the commercial launch of several branded products in recent years, includingas well as the launch of generic versions of branded drugs, such as Adderall XR.

XR, Intuniv and Strattera.

Table of Contents

Treatment options for ADHD in the U.S. market can be broadly classified as either stimulant or as non-stimulant products. Shire plc isPlc, one of the leaders in the U.S. ADHD market, with threehas four marketed products: Vyvanse, a stimulant prodrugdrug product launched in 2007; Intuniv, a non-stimulant treatmentproduct launched in November 2009; and Adderall XR, an extended release stimulant treatment designed to provideproduct providing once-daily dosing.dosing, launched in October 2001; and Mydayis, a stimulant product launched in August 2017. Other marketed stimulant products for the treatment of ADHD in the U.S. market include the following once-daily formulations: Concerta,Concerta; Metadate CD,CD; Ritalin LA,LA; Focalin XR; Daytrana; Adzenys XR-ODT; Cotempla XR Daytrana,ODT; and Adzenys XR-ODT.Aptensio XR. Other marketed non-stimulants arein the U.S. include Strattera and Kapvay.

We are also aware of clinical development efforts by several other organizationscompanies, including Alcobra, Sunovion, Neos Therapeutics,Ironshore/Highland and NeurovanceOtsuka, to develop additional treatment options for ADHD. Sunovion recently reported thatfiled its non-stimulant product, Dasotraline, with the FDA in September of 2017 for treatment of adults, children and adolescents with ADHD. Sunovion received a non-approvable letter. In 2019, Ironshore/Highland launched Jornay PM, a new stimulant product. In 2017, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. announced an agreement with Neurovance, Inc. to acquire Neurovance, a privately held, venture-funded, clinical stage pharmaceutical company, focused on ADHD and related disorders. Otsuka is currently conducting Phase III developmentclinical trials to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of non-stimulant Centanafadine sustained-release tablets in adults with ADHD.
Bipolar Competition
Treatment options for ADHD, dasotraline did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement atbipolar disorder include mood stabilizers, atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants. The majority of patients are on mood stabilizers, commonly with atypical antipsychotics in bipolar I disorder or as monotherapy in bipolar II disorder. Within the eight week primary endpointmood stabilizer category, Lithium and Depakote are used most in bipolar I disorder treatment, followed by Lamictal and Trileptal, while Lamictal is preferred in treating bipolar II disorder, followed by Lithium, Trileptal and Depakote. Trileptal is used off-label for treating bipolar disorder. Based on our market research, we believe that SPN-604 is expected to compete within the ADHD Rating Scale (RS) IV (with adult prompts) total score compared to the placebo-treated group. Alcobra also recently reported that its Phase III investigational product Metadoxine Extended Release (MDX) for the treatment of ADHD in adult patients did not meet the primary endpoint of demonstrating a statistically significant difference from placebo in the change from baseline of the investigator rating of the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). Ironshore/Highland also announced on December 15, 2016 that the FDA had accepted for review the NDA for HLD200 (delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate capsules), which was developedmood stabilizer category as a potential new option for physicians treating patients with ADHD. HLD200 is a stimulant medication intended for dosage administration in the evening, prior to bedtime, to target the control of ADHD symptoms and improve functioning from the time the patient wakes and throughout the day. The expected action date by the FDA under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) is July 30, 2017.

second line therapy.

Our Proprietary Technology Platforms

We have a successful track record of developing novel extended release products by applying proprietary formulation technologies to known drugs to improve their side effect profile or to improve patient compliance. In addition, we have developed new indication for existing therapies and to enable the treatment of new indications.therapies. Our key proprietary technology platforms include Microtrol, Solutrol and EnSoTrol. These technologies create novel, customized product profiles, designed to enhance efficacy, reduce the frequency of dosing andso as to improve patient compliance and improve tolerability. We have employed our technologies in the development of a total of nineten products that are currently on the market, including our products Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, along with seveneight products being marketed by companies for whom we have developed sustained release formulations.our partners. Trokendi XR uses the Microtrol multiparticulate delivery platform, andwhile Oxtellar XR uses the Solutrol matrix delivery platform. EnSoTrol was utilized to develop Orenitram, an oral formulation of treprostinil diethanolamine, or treprostinil, which was launched by United Therapeutics Corporation (UTC) in 2014.

Microtrol was also utilized to develop Mydayis, which was launched by Shire in 2017.

Our Research and Development group is also engaged in generating and assessing NCEs. These NCEs were generated by leveraging our expertise in structure function relationships in active molecules. Our NCEs are currently being assessed in preclinical pharmacology models for CNS activity, and are advancing through IND enabling toxicology studies to support future clinical investigation.
Intellectual Property and Exclusivity

Overview

We have been building and continue to build our intellectual propertyIP portfolio relating to our products and product candidates, including Oxtellar XR, Trokendi XR and Trokendi XR.SPN-812. We seek patent protection, where appropriate, both in the United StatesU.S. and internationally for our products and product candidates. We have established and continue to build proprietary positions for Oxtellar XR, Trokendi XR, our pipeline product candidates and our technologies in the U.S. and abroad.

Our policy is to protect our innovations and proprietary products by, among other things, filing patent applications in the U.S. and abroad, (includingincluding Europe, Canada and other countries when appropriate).appropriate. We also rely on trade secrets, know-how, proprietary knowledge, continuing technological innovation and in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position. We cannot be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents that may be granted to us in the future will be commercially useful in protecting our technology.

We cannot be sure that any patents, if granted, will sustain legal challenge.

Our success will depend significantly onon: our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for the technologies and products we consider important to our business,business; our ability to defend our patents,


Table of Contents

patents; our ability to preserve the confidentiality of our trade secretssecrets; and to operate our business without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties.

We have established and continue to build proprietary positions for

On Oxtellar XR, the Company prevailed in litigation against third parties, and, therefore, we expect that Oxtellar XR will have patent protection through the expiry of its patents in 2027. On Trokendi XR, our pipeline product candidates and technologies in the U.S. and abroad.

Patents for both Oxtellar XR andCompany entered into settlement agreements that allow third parties to enter the market by selling a generic version of Trokendi XR have received numerous Paragraph IV Notice Letters and we have filed claims for infringement of our patents against the third-parties.by January 1, 2023, or earlier under certain circumstances. For more information, please see Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Patent Portfolio

We currently have ten U.S. patents that cover Trokendi XR. We own all of the issued patents. We have one patent issued for extended release topiramate in each of the following countries: Mexico; Australia; Japan; and Canada. We have two patents issued in Europe. The ten issued U.S. patents covering Trokendi XR will expire no earlier than 2027.
The Company has entered into settlement agreements with third parties, permitting sale of a generic version of Trokendi XR by January 1, 2023, or earlier under certain circumstances.
Our extended release oxcarbazepine patent portfolio currently includes tentwelve U.S. patents, sevennine of which cover Oxtellar XR. We have also obtained two patents for extended release oxcarbazepine in Europe and one patent each in Canada, Japan, Australia, China, and Mexico. In addition, we have certain pending U.S. patent applications that cover various extended release formulations containing oxcarbazepine. The sevennine issued U.S. patents covering Oxtellar XR will expire no earlier than 2027. We own all of the issued patents and the pending U.S. patent applications.

In addition to the We have two issued patents for extended release oxcarbazepine in both Europe and patent applications relating to Oxtellar XR, we currently have eight U.S. patents that cover Trokendi XR. We haveAustralia, and one patent issued in each in Mexico, Australia, Japanof the following countries: Canada; Japan; China and Canada forMexico. In addition, we have a pending U.S. patent application that covers various extended release topiramate. We have two patents issued in Europe for extended release topiramate. The eight issued U.S. patents covering Trokendi XR will expire no earlier than 2027. We own all of the issued patents and pending applications.

formulations containing oxcarbazepine.

Our patent portfolio also contains patent applications relating to our other pipeline products. Specifically, with regard to SPN-810, we are developing an IP position covering the novel synthesis process of the active ingredient, its novel use in IA and its novel formulation. We have four families of pending U.S. non-provisional and foreign counterpart patent applications relating to our SPN-810 product candidate.SPN-810. Patents, if issued, could have terms expiring from 2029 to 2033. We have two patents issued each in the U.S. and Europe, three patents issued in Japan, and one patent issued each in the U.S.,Canada, Mexico, Australia and Japan,Australia, covering modified release formulations of molindone hydrochloride. In another patent family, covering the novel synthesis process of synthesis of the active ingredient, we have twofour patents issued in the U.S. In a, two patents issued in Japan and Australia, and one patent issued each in Europe and Mexico. The third patent family, covering use of molindone hydrochloride in treating IA, we haveaggression, includes three patents issued each in the U.S. and Japan, two patents issued each in Mexico and Australia, and one patent issued in Japan.Canada. We own all of the issued patents and the pending patent applications.

With regard to our SPN-812, product candidate, we have three families of pending U.S. non-provisional and foreign counterpart patent applications. Patents, if issued, could expire from 2029 to 2033. We have one patent issued each in Europe and one in Canada, in one of these families, covering a method of treating ADHD using viloxazine.viloxazine hydrochloride. In another family, covering the novel synthesis process of active ingredient, synthesis, we have twofour patents issued in the U.S., five patents issued in Mexico, and one patent issued each in Europe, Mexico,Japan, Canada and Australia. We have one patentfour patents issued in the U.S. covering modified release formulations of viloxazine.viloxazine hydrochloride, two patents issued in Japan and Australia and one patent issued in Mexico. We own all of the issued patents and the pending patent applications.


U.S. Patent Application Process
The United StatesU.S. patent system permits the filing of provisional and non-provisional patent applications. A non-provisional patent application is examined bysubmitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and can mature into a patent once the USPTO determines that the claimed invention meets the standards for patentability. A provisional patent application is not examined for patentability, and automatically expires 12 months after its filing date. As a result, a provisional patent application cannot mature into a patent. The requirements for filing a provisional patent application are not as strict as those for filing a non-provisional patent application. Provisional applications are often used, among other things, to establish an early filing date for a subsequent non-provisional patent application. The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we file, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non-provisional patent application. In the U.S., a patent's


Table of Contents

term may be lengthened byvia a patent term adjustment (PTA), which compensates a patentee for administrative delays by the USPTO in granting a patent. In viewBecause of a recent court decision, the USPTO is under greater scrutiny regarding its calculations becausein which the USPTO erred in calculating the PTA which resulted inby denying the patentee a portion of the patent term to which it was entitled. entitled, the USPTO is under greater scrutiny regarding its calculations of PTAs.

Alternatively, a patent's term may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over another patent.

In evaluating the patentability of a claimed invention, the filing date of a non-provisional patent application is used by the USPTO to determine what information isconstitutes prior art. If certain requirements are satisfied, a non-provisional patent application can claim the benefit of the filing date of an earliera previously filed provisional patent application. As a result,In such an instance, the filing date accorded byto the provisional patent application may supersede information that otherwise could preclude the patentability of an invention.

The term of a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug may also be eligible for patent term extension (PTE) which. This permits the patent term restorationto be extended as compensation for thethat portion of a patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, permits a PTE of up to five years beyond the expirationexpiry date of the patent. The length of the PTE is related to the length of time the drug is under regulatoryFDA review. PatentHowever, patent extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval and onlyapproval. Only one patent applicable tofor an approved drug may be extended. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. drug are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions.
In the future, if and when our pharmaceutical products receive FDA or other regulatory approval, we may be able to apply for PTEs on patents covering those products. Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of our SPN-810 and SPN-812 product candidates andthe issuance of a U.S. patent, we may obtain a U.S. patent that is eligible for limited patent term restoration.

Other Intellectual Property Rights

We seek trademark protection in the U.S. and internationally, where available and when appropriate. We have filed for trademark protection for several marks, which we use in connection with our pharmaceutical research and development collaborations as well as with our products. We are the owner of various U.S. federal trademark registrations (®) and registration applications (™(TM), including the following marks referred to in this Annual Report on Form10-KForm 10-K, pursuant to applicable U.S. intellectual property laws: "Supernus®," "Microtrol®," "Solutrol®," "Trokendi XR®," "Oxtellar XR®," and the registered Supernus Pharmaceuticals logo.

From time to time, we may find it necessary or prudent to obtain licenses from third party intellectual propertyIP holders. Where licenses are readily available at reasonable cost, such licenses are considered a normal cost of doing business. In other instances, however, we may use the results of freedom-to-operate inquiries and internal analyses to guide our early-stage research away from areas where we are likely to encounter obstacles in the form of third party intellectual property.IP. For example, where a third party holds relevant intellectual propertyIP and is a direct competitor, a license might not be available on commercially reasonable terms or available at all. We strive to identify potential third party intellectual propertyIP issues in the early stages of our research programs, in order to minimize the cost and disruption of resolving such issues.

To protect our competitive position, it may be necessary to enforce our patent rights through litigation against infringing third parties. We presently have a lawsuitno pending against TWi to enforce our patent rights concerning Oxtellar XR patents.lawsuits. See Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings.Proceedings. Litigation to enforce our own patent rights is subject to uncertainties that cannot be quantified in advance. In the event of an adverse outcome in litigation, we could be prevented from commercializing a product or precluded from using certain aspects of our technology platforms as a result of patent infringement claims asserted against us.platforms. This could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, litigation involving our patents carries the


Table of Contents

risk that one or more of our patents will be held invalid (in whole or in part,part; on a claim-by-claim basis) or held unenforceable. Such an adverse court ruling could allow third parties to commercialize products or use technologies that are similar to ours, and then compete directly with us, without paymentcompensation to us. See "Risk Factors—IfPart I, Item 1A—Risk Factors: "If we are sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, it could be costly and time consuming to defend such a suit. An unfavorable outcome in that litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business."


In-Licensing Arrangements

Afecta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

We have two license agreements with Afecta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Afecta) pursuant to which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to selected product candidates, including an exclusive license to SPN-810. We may pay up to $300,000 upon the achievement of certain milestones. If a product candidate is successfully developed and commercialized, we will be obligated to pay royalties to Afecta based on worldwide net product sales at a rate in the low-single digits.

Rune HealthCare Limited

We have a purchase and sale agreement with Rune HealthCare Limited (Rune), where we obtained the exclusive worldwide rights to a product concept from Rune for SPN-809. If we receive approval to market and sell any products covered by the agreement, we will be obligated to pay royalties to Rune based on worldwide net product sales, at a rate in the low-single digits.

SPN-817
We obtained worldwide rights, excluding certain markets in Asia where rights have been previously out-licensed, to SPN-817. SPN-817 has received Orphan Drug designation from the FDA for the treatment of Dravet Syndrome, a severe form of childhood epilepsy. These rights were obtained through our acquisition of Biscayne Neurotherapeutics, Inc. We may be obligated to pay up to $73 million if certain development milestones are achieved. In addition, we may be obligated to pay up to $95 million if certain sales milestones are achieved. In addition, we will be obligated to pay a low single digit royalty on net sales to Biscayne, and any applicable royalties to third parties for the use of in-licensed IP. The maximum combined royalty we will pay to all parties on net product sales is approximately 12%, depending on the IP covering the marketed product and the applicable tiered sales levels.
Confidential Information and Inventions Assignment Agreements

We require our employees, temporary employees and consultants to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment, consulting or collaborative relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed by or made known during the course of the relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties, except in specific circumstances. The agreements provide that all inventions resulting from work performed for us or relating to our business and conceived of or completed by the individual during employment or assignment, as applicable, shall be our exclusive property, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

We seek to protect our products, product candidates and our technologies through a combination of patents, trade secrets, proprietary know-how, FDA exclusivity and contractual restrictions on disclosure.

Government Regulation

Product Approval

Government authorities in the United States at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, marketing, export and import of products such as those we are developing. Our product candidates must receive final approval from the FDA before they may be marketed legally in the U.S.

U.S. Drug Development Process

In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug,

The research and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and through implementation of regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and ensuring compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process approval process, or after approval, may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could includegenerally begins with discovery research, which focuses on the


Table identification of Contents

FDA's refusal to approve pending applications, to withdraw an approval, to institute or issue a clinical hold, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, product detention, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, to impose injunctions, fines, refusal of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties.

molecule that has the desired effect against a given disease. The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves the following:

Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation, as well as animal studies, to assess the characteristics and potential pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity of the product. The conduct of the preclinical tests must comply with FDA regulations and requirements, including good laboratory practices.
If preclinical testing of an NDAidentified compound proves successful, the compound moves into clinical development. While these are generally conducted in three sequential phases, the phases may overlap or be combined.
Phase I - Involves the first human tests of the drug, in a small number of healthy volunteers or in patients, to assess safety, tolerability, potential dosing, and if possible, early evidence on effectiveness.

Phase II - Involves trials in a relatively small group of patients, to determine the effectiveness of the drug for a new drug;

Satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the clinical study sites and/or manufacturing facility or facilities at which the drug is producedparticular indication(s); dosage tolerance and optimum dosage; and to assess compliance with current Good Clinical Practicesidentify common adverse effects and Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP);safety risks.

Phase III - Tests confirming favorable results in earlier phases, in a significantly larger patient population, and

FDA review to further demonstrate efficacy and approval of the NDA.

The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources and we cannot be certain that any approvals for our product candidates will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Our total research and development expense was approximately $42.8 million and $29.1 million for each of 2016 and 2015, respectively. In order to continue the progress of our product candidates, significant increases in these expenditures will be required.

Once a suitable product candidate is successfully created, a preliminary development strategy is determined. Usually, an IND is opened with adequate preclinical and clinical trial material to permit initiation of the first proposed clinical trial. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA places the clinical trial on a clinical hold within that 30-day time period. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. safety.


Clinical holds also may be imposed by the FDA at any time before or during trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance.

All clinical trials must be conducted underin compliance with applicable regulations and consistent with good clinical practices, as well as protocols detailing the supervisionobjectives of onethe trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the parameters to determine effectiveness. Each protocol involving testing on patients, and subsequent protocol amendments, must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. The FDA may order the temporary halt or more qualified investigatorspermanent discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time, or to impose other sanctions if they believe that the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with GCP regulations. These regulations include the requirement that all research subjects provideapplicable requirements, or if continuing the trial presents an unacceptable risk to the clinical trial patients. The study protocol and informed consent. Further,consent information for patients in clinical trials must also be submitted to an institutional review board (IRB) must review and approve the planor ethics committee, for any clinical trial before it commences at any institution. An IRB considers, among other things, whether the risks to individuals participating in the trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits.approval. The IRBIRB/ethics committee may also approves the protocol for conductingrequire the clinical trial andat the consent form that mustsite to be providedhalted, either temporarily or permanently, for failure to each clinical trial subject or his or her legal representative and must monitor the clinical trial until completed.

Once an IND is in effect, each new clinical protocol and any amendments to the protocol must be submittedcomply with the IND for FDA review, and to the IRBs for approval. The protocol details, amongIRB/ethics committee requirements, or they may impose other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria, and the parameters to be used to monitor subject safety.

sanctions.

Table of Contents

Human clinical trials for product candidates are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies, and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product candidate andcandidate. They must finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities, in accordance with cGMPcurrent good manufacturing practice (cGMP) requirements. Moreover, product used in late stage clinical trials must be manufactured under the proposed commercial process, and at the same scale as will be used commercially. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, thecandidate. The manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stabilitytested. Stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

The research and development process, from discovery through a new drug launch, requires substantial time, effort, skill, and financial resources. The research and development of any product candidate has a significant amount of inherent uncertainty. Often, substantial resources must be committed even though success is far from assured. There is no guarantee when, or if, a product candidate will receive the regulatory approval required to launch a new drug or new indication of an existing drug.
In addition to the development of new products and new formulations, research and development projects also may include Phase IV trials, sometimes called post-marketing studies. For such projects, clinical trials are designed and conducted to collect additional data regarding, among other parameters, the benefits and risks of an approved drug. Alternatively, these trials may be conducted to assess the effectiveness of a product candidate in a new patient population.
U.S. FDA Review and Approval Processes

After the completion of the required clinical testing, an NDA is prepared and submitted to the FDA. FDA approval of the NDA is required before marketing of the product may begin in the U.S. The NDA must include the results of product development,all preclinical, studiesclinical and clinical trials,other testing, along with descriptionsa description of the manufacturing process, validation of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on the drug, proposed labeling and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA for a new drug.information. The NDA requests approval to market the product.

NDAs are Each NDA is subject to a substantial user fee at the time of submission, unless a waiver is granted by the FDA. A holder of an approved NDA may also be subject to annual product and establishment user fees. These fees typically increase annually.

The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of an NDA to determine whether the application will be accepted for filing, which is based on the agency’s threshold determination that the NDA is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. Additional information may be requested, rather than accepting an application for filing.
Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review. Review status could be either standard or priority. The review period for standard review applications is typically ten months and, for priority review applications, it is typically six months post acceptance. The review process may be extended by the FDA for three additional months, to consider new information submitted during the review for clarification purposes.
The FDA may also refer applications for novel drug products or drug products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, which is typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts. The advisory committee reviews and evaluates information, and prepares a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations. After the FDA evaluates the information provided in the NDA, it issues either an approval letter or a complete response letter. A complete response letter outlines the deficiencies in the submission, and may require substantial additional testing or information in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. If and when those deficiencies have been addressed, the FDA will re-initiate review. If it is satisfied that the deficiencies have been addressed, the FDA will issue an approval letter.

During the review period, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with good clinical practice regulations. The FDA will inspect the facility(ies) at which the drug is manufactured, to ensure compliance with cGMP regulations. The FDA may also undertake an audit of nonclinical and clinical sites. The FDA will not approve the product unless compliance is satisfactory, and unless the application contains the data that provide substantial evidence that the drug is safe and effective in the indication studied.
A marketing approval authorizes commercial marketing of the drug, with specific prescribing information for specific indications. As a condition of NDA approval, the FDA may require a risk evaluation and mitigating strategy (REMS), to help ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh the potential risks. REMS can include medication guides, communication plans for healthcare professionals, and elements to assure safe use, such restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. Moreover, product approval may require substantial post-approval testing and surveillance to monitor the drug’s safety or efficacy in commercial use, and may impose other conditions, including distribution and labeling restrictions, which can materially affect the potential addressable market and profitability of the drug. Once granted, product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained, if problems are identified following initial marketing, or if post-marketing commitments are not met.
The approval process is lengthy and difficult. The FDA may refuse to approve the NDA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied. Further, data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive, or the FDA may interpret data differently than us. In addition, if a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases, dosages, or indications. This could restrict the commercial value of the product. Also, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling as well as requiring Phase IV testing.
New Drug Application
Our activities encompass two types of NDAs: the Section 505(b)(1) orNDA (Full NDA) and the Section 505(b)(2) applications. ForNDA.
A Section 505(b)(1), which is a standard 505(b)(1) application,Full NDA, must contain all pertinent information must be partand full reports of investigations conducted by the applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the regulatory submission under that NDA number.drug, as well as complete preclinical, clinical and manufacturing information.
Section 505(b)(2) NDAs often provide an alternative path to FDA approval for new or improved formulations, or for new uses of previously approved products. For a Section 505(b)(2) application, the FDA permits the submission of an NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from clinical trials not conducted by or for the applicant, and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. The FDA interprets Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA to permitpermits the applicant to rely upon the FDA's previous findings of safety and effectiveness for an approved product. The FDA requires submission of information needed to support any changes to a previously approved drug, such as published data or new studies conducted by the applicant, including bioavailability or bioequivalence studies, or clinical trials demonstrating safety and effectiveness. The FDA may then approve the new product candidate for all or some of the label indications for which the referenced product has been approved, as well as for any new indication sought by the Section 505(b)(2) applicant.

The submission of an NDASection 505(b)(2) regulatory approval process is subjectdesigned to the payment ofallow for potentially expedited, lower cost and lower risk regulatory approval, based on previously established safety, efficacy and manufacturing information on a substantial user fee, although a waiver of such fee may be obtained under certain limited circumstances.

In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003,drug which was reauthorized under the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act of 2012, an NDA must contain,a priori, or propose clinical work that supports the product's use in all relevant pediatric subpopulations. The FDA may grant deferrals for submission of data or full or partial waivers of the data requirements. Pursuant to the FDA's approval of Oxtellar XR, we committed to the conduct of four pediatric post-marketing


Table of Contents

studies; however,has been already approved by the FDA granted a waiver for the pediatric study requirements for ages birth to one month andsame or a deferral for submission of post-marketing assessments for children one month to six years of age. Pursuant to the FDA's approval of Trokendi XR, the FDA granted a deferral for submission of post-marketing pediatric studies in the following categories: (1) adjunctive therapy in partial onset seizures (POS) for children one month to less than six years of age, (2) initial monotherapy in POS and primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) for children two years to less than ten years of age, and (3) adjunctive therapy in PGTC and adjunctive therapy in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome from two years to less than six years of age.

Since our product approvals, we have gained more knowledge about our abilities to create formulations, and programs that would enable us to meet our deferred pediatric commitments, Supernus has identified a need to renegotiate the commitments made at the time of NDA approvals for both Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. Supernus is actively interfacing with the FDA on these programs and these commitments.

Section 505(b)(2) New Drug Applications

different indication.

To the extent that athe Section 505(b)(2) NDA reliesapplicant is relying on clinical trialsstudies conducted for a previously approved drug product or the FDA's prior findings of safety and effectiveness for aon previously approved drug product, the Section 505(b)(2) applicant must submit patent certifications in its Section 505(b)(2) application with respect to any patents for the approved product on which the application relies that are listed in the FDA's publication, Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly referred to as the Orange Book. Specifically, the applicant must certify for each listed patent that either: (1) the required patent information has not been filed; or (2) the listed patent has expired; or (3) the listed patent has not expired, but will expire on a particular date, and approval is not sought until after patent expiration; or (4) the listed patent is invalid, unenforceable or will not be infringed by the proposed new product. A certification that the new product will not infringe the previously approved product's listed patent, or that such patent is invalid or unenforceable, is known as a Paragraph IV certification.
If the applicant does not challenge one or more listed patents through a Paragraph IV certification, the FDA will not approve the Section 505(b)(2) NDA application until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired. Further, the FDA also will also not approve, as applicable, a Section 505(b)(2) NDA application until any non-patent exclusivity has expired, such as for example,example: five-year exclusivity period for obtaining approval of an NCE,NCE; or three year exclusivity period for an approval based on new clinical trials,trials; or pediatric exclusivity, listed in the Orange Book for the referenced product, has expired.

product.


A section 505(b)(2) NDA applicant must send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to the owner of the referenced NDA for the previously approved product and relevant patent holders within 20 days after the Section 505(b)(2) NDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. If the relevant patent holder elects to initiate litigation, the Section 505(b)(2) applicant may invest a significant amount of time and expense in the development of its product, only to be subject to significant delay and patent litigation before its product may be commercialized. Alternatively, if the NDA applicant or relevant patent holder does not file a patent infringement lawsuit within the specified 45 day period, the FDA may approve the Section 505(b)(2) application at any time.

Notwithstanding the approval of many products by the FDA pursuant to Section 505(b)(2) over the last few years, some pharmaceutical companies and others have objected to the FDA's interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA changes its interpretation of Section 505(b)(2), or if the FDA's interpretation is successfully challenged in court, this could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any Section 505(b)(2) NDA that we submit.

We have filed a Section 505(b)(1) NDA for SPN-812 and will need to file a 505(b)(1) NDA for certain products in the future. Of its very nature, the Section 505(b)(1) NDA for SPN-812 carries a higher degree of regulatory approval risk than a Section 505(b)(2) NDA. In addition, a requirement for more extensive testing and development can adversely impact our ability to compete with alternative products that arrive on the NDA submissions formarket sooner than our product candidates,candidate. Further, the time and financial resources required to obtain FDA approval for SPN-812 could substantially and materially increase. After we intend to followgain approval for SPN-812 for one indication, additional indications may be submitted using the Section 505(b)(2) development pathway when appropriate.


Table of Contents

FDA Review of New Drug Applications

The FDA reviews all NDAs submitted to ensure that they are sufficiently complete for substantive review before it accepts them for filing.regulatory pathway. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept annot approve our filing under Section 505(b)(2) for SPN-812 for other indication(s), and therefore would require a full NDA for filing. In such case, the time and financial resources required to obtain approval could also significantly increase.

Pediatric Information
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2007 (PREA), NDAs or supplements to NDAs must contain data to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indication(s) in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the drug is safe and effective. The FDA may grant deferrals for submission of data, full waivers, or partial waivers of the data requirements. Unless otherwise required by regulation, PREA does not apply to any drug for an indication for which an orphan drug designation has been granted.
Orphan Drug Designation
Orphan drug designation is granted by the FDA to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the U.S. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey an advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process. However, if an orphan drug later receives approval for the indication for which it has orphan designation, the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same indication. Exceptions to this event,policy include showing clinical superiority to the product with the orphan drug exclusivity, or if the license holder cannot supply sufficient quantities of the product. Orphan drug exclusivity in the U.S., which is seven years, does not prevent the FDA from approving a different drug for the same disease or condition, or the same drug for a different disease or condition, provided the sponsor has conducted appropriate clinical trials required for approval. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research expenses and waiver of the NDA must be re-submitted withapplication user fee for the additional information. The re-submitted application alsoorphan indication.
Priority Review
Under FDA policies, a drug candidate is subjecteligible for priority review, or review within six months from filing, for a new molecular entity (NME). In addition, a six month review period may pertain to review beforea non-NME, if the FDA accepts itdrug candidate provides a significant improvement as compared to marketed drugs in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a disease. A fast track designated drug candidate would ordinarily meet the FDA’s criteria for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantivepriority review. The FDA reviewsmakes its determination of priority or standard review during the 60-day filing period post the initial NDA submission.

Fast Track Designation
The FDA is required to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs, that are intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and for which there is currently no effective treatment. These products must demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition. The FDA must determine if the drug candidate qualifies for the fast track designation within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s request. Once the FDA designates a drug as a fast track candidate, it is required to facilitate the development, and expedite the review of that drug, by providing more frequent communication with, and guidance to, the sponsor. In addition to other benefits such as greater interaction with the FDA, the FDA may initiate a review of the sections of a fast track drug’s NDA before the application is complete. This rolling review is available if the applicant provides and the FDA approves a schedule for the submission of the remaining information, and if the applicant pays the applicable user fees. However, the FDA’s review period for filing and reviewing an application does not begin until the last section of the NDA has been submitted. Additionally, a fast track designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if the FDA believes that the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the clinical trial process.
Post-approval Regulatory Requirements
Any drugs for which we receive FDA approval are subject to determine,continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, whether a product is safe and effective for its intended use and whether its manufacturing is cGMP-compliant to assure and preservethings: record-keeping requirements; reporting of AE’s with the product's identity, strength, quality and purity. Before approving an NDA,product; providing the FDA will inspectwith updated safety and efficacy information; product sampling and distribution requirements; complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements; and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements.
Drugs may be promoted only for the facilityapproved indication and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. Changes to some of the conditions established in an approved application, including changes in indications, labelling, or manufacturing processes or facilities, wheremay require submission to further review, and approval by the productFDA before the change can be implemented.
Adverse event reporting and submission of periodic reports is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications.following marketing approval. The FDA may referalso require post-marketing testing, known as Phase IV testing, REMS, and surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved product, or to place conditions on an approval that could restrict the distribution and use of the product.
Pursuant to the FDA's approval of Oxtellar XR, we committed to conducting four pediatric post-marketing studies; however, the FDA granted a waiver for the pediatric study requirements for ages from birth to one month, and a deferral for submission of post-marketing assessments for children one month to six years of age.
Pursuant to the FDA's approval of Trokendi XR, the FDA granted a deferral for submission of post-marketing pediatric studies in the following categories: (1) adjunctive therapy in partial onset seizures (POS) for children one month to less than six years of age; (2) initial monotherapy in POS and PGTC for children two years to less than ten years of age; and (3) adjunctive therapy in PGTC and adjunctive therapy in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome from two years to less than six years of age.
Since our product approvals, we have created formulations and successfully executed programs that would enable us to meet our deferred pediatric commitments. As a result of this additional information, we have identified a need to renegotiate the commitments made at the time of our NDA approvals for both Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. Supernus plans to an advisory committee for review, evaluationinterface with the FDA on these programs and recommendationthese commitments.
In addition, quality control as well as the manufacture, packaging and labeling procedures must continue to whetherconform to cGMPs after approval. Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the application should bemanufacturing and distribution of approved and under what conditions. An advisory committee is a panel of independent experts who provide advice and recommendations when requesteddrugs are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA on mattersand by certain state agencies for compliance with cGMPs. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas of importance that come beforeproduction and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMPs. Regulatory agencies may withdraw product approval or request product recalls if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, or if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered. In addition, prescription drug manufacturers in the agency. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee.

The approval process is lengthy and difficult and the FDA may refuse to approve an NDA if theU.S. must comply with applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical data or other data and information. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive and the FDA may interpret data differently than we interpret the same data. The FDA will issue a complete response letter if the agency decides not to approve the NDA in its present form. The complete response letter usually describes allprovisions of the specific deficiencies that the FDA identifiedDrug Supply Chain Security Act, and: provide and receive product tracing information; maintain appropriate licenses; ensure they only work with other properly licensed entities; and have procedures in the NDA. The deficiencies identified may be minor; for example, requiring labeling changes, or major; for example, requiring additional clinical trials. Additionally, the complete response letter may include recommended actions that the applicant might takeplace to place the application in a condition for approval. If a complete response letter is issued, the applicant may either resubmit the NDA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter, withdraw the application, or then request an opportunity for a hearing.

If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseasesidentify and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may require Phase IV testing which involves clinical trials designed to further assess a drug's safetyproperly handle suspect and effectiveness after NDA approval and may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized.

illegitimate products.


Patent Term Restoration and Marketing Exclusivity

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, some of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extensionPTE under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term restoration of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and during the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product's approval date. The patent term restoration period is generally one-half50% the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of an NDA, plus the time between the submission date of an NDA and the approval of that application. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for the extension, and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent and within sixty days of approval of the drug. The


Table of Contents

USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration.

Market exclusivity provisions under the FDCA can also delay the submission or the approval of certain applications. The FDCAFederal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) provides a five-year period of non-patent marketing exclusivity within the United StatesU.S., to the first applicant to gain approval of an NDA for an NCE. A drug is an NCE if the FDA has not previously approved any other new drug containing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or active moiety, which is the molecule or ion responsible for the therapeutic action of the drug substance. During the exclusivity period, the FDA may not accept for review an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) or a Section 505(b)(2) NDA submitted by another company for another version of such drug, where the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference to all the data required for approval. As an alternative to submission via 505(b)(2) approval, an applicant may choose to submit a full Section 505(b)(1) NDA, but such an NDAwherein the applicant would be required to conduct its own preclinical and adequate, well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. Further, a Section 505(b)(2) applicationThey may be submitted after four years if it contains a Paragraph IV certification.

not reference to other clinical trials or data.

The FDCA also provides three years of marketing exclusivity for an NDA, Section 505(b)(2) NDA, or supplement to an existing NDA, if new clinical investigations (other than bioavailability studies) that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are deemed by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application. Such clinical trials may, for example, supportsupport: new indications, dosages,indications; dosages; routes of administrationadministration; or strengths of an existing drug, ordrug. Alternatively, these trials may be for a new use, if the new clinical investigations that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are determined by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application. This exclusivity, sometimes referred to as clinical investigation exclusivity, prevents the FDA from approving an application under Section 505(b)(2) for the same conditions of use associated with the new clinical investigations before the expiration of three years from the date of approval. Such three-year exclusivity, however, would not prevent the approval of another application if the applicant submits a Section 505(b)(1) NDA and has conducted its own adequate, well-controlled clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy, nor would it prevent approval of a generic product or Section 505(b)(2) product that did not incorporate the exclusivity-protected changes of the approved drug product. The FDCA, FDA regulations and other applicable regulations and policies provide incentives to manufacturers to create modified, non-infringing versions of a drug, to facilitate the approval of an ANDA or other application for generic substitutes.

Pediatric exclusivity is another type of exclusivity granted in the U.S. Pediatric exclusivity, if granted, provides an additional six months of exclusivity to be attached to any existing exclusivity (e.g., three or five year exclusivity) or to patent protection for a drug. This six month exclusivity, which runs from the end of other exclusivity protection or patent delay, may be granted based on the voluntary completion of a pediatric trial in accordance with an FDA-issued "Written Request" for such a trial.
Other Regulatory Requirements
The current pediatric exclusivity provision was reauthorizedU.S. has enacted a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in September 2007.

Post-Approval Requirements

Any drugs for which we receive FDA approval are subjectways that could affect our ability to continuing regulationsell our products profitably. In the U.S., the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of AEs with the product, providing the FDA with updated safetyHealth Care and efficacy information, product sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements. In September 2007, the Food and Drug Administration AmendmentsEducation Reconciliation Act of 2007 was enacted, giving2010 (as amended), is a sweeping measure intended to improve quality of care, constrain healthcare spending, and expand healthcare coverage within the U.S. This is accomplished primarily through imposition of health insurance mandates on employers, and individuals and expansion of the Medicaid program.

In addition to FDA enhanced post-marketing authority, including the authority to require post-marketing studies and clinical trials, labeling changes basedrestrictions on new safety information, and compliance with risk evaluations and mitigation strategies approved by the FDA. The FDA strictly regulates labeling, advertising, promotion andmarketing of pharmaceutical products, several other types of information on products that are placed onstate and federal laws have been applied to restrict certain business and marketing practices in the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indicationspharmaceutical industry in recent years. These laws include: anti-kickback; false claims; patient data privacy; and in accordance

security and transparency statutes and regulations.

Table of Contents

with the provisions of the approved label. Further, manufacturers of drugs must continueThe U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), to comply with cGMP requirements, which are extensive and require considerable time, resources and ongoing investment to ensure compliance. In addition, certain changes to the manufacturing process generally require prior FDA approval before being implemented. Other types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications and additional labeling claims,we are also subject, prohibits corporations and individuals from engaging in certain activities to further FDA review and approval.

Drug manufacturersobtain or retain business, or to influence a person working in an official capacity. Under FCPA, it is illegal to pay, offer to pay or authorize the payment of anything of value to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate, in an attempt to obtain or retain business, or to otherwise influence a person working in an official capacity. Historically, pharmaceutical companies have been the target of FCPA and other entities involved in the manufacturinganti-corruption investigations and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws. The cGMP requirements apply to all stages of the manufacturing process, including the production, processing, sterilization, packaging, labeling, storage and shipment of the drug. Manufacturers must establish validated systems to ensure that products meet specifications and regulatory standards, and test each product batch or lot prior to its release. We rely, and expect to continue to rely on, third parties for the production of clinical quantities of our product candidates. Future FDA and state inspections may identify compliance issues at the facilities of our contract manufacturers that may disrupt production or distribution or may require substantial resources to correct.

The FDA may withdraw a product approval if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market. Further, the failure to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements may result in administrative or judicial actions, such as fines, warning letters, holds on clinical trials, product recalls or seizures, product detention or refusal to permit the import or export of products, refusal to approve pending applications or supplements, restrictions on marketing or manufacturing, injunctions or civil or criminal penalties.

From time to time, legislation is drafted, introduced and passed by the United States Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the approval, manufacturing and marketing of products regulated by the FDA. For example, in July 2012, the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act was enacted, expanding drug supply chain requirements and strengthening FDA's response to drug shortages, among other things. In addition to new legislation, the FDA regulations and policies are often revised or reinterpreted by the agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether further legislative or FDA regulation or policy changes will be enacted or implemented and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.

Foreign Regulation


In addition to regulations in the United States,U.S., we are subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials, and commercial sales, andas well as distribution of our product candidates, to the extent we choose to clinically evaluate or sell any products outside of the U.S. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval of a product by the comparableappropriate regulatory authorities of foreign countries before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The requirements, approval process and time frame varies from country to country and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from country to country.each jurisdiction. As in the United States,U.S., post-approval regulatory requirements, such as those regarding product manufacture, marketing, or distribution would apply to any product that is approved outside the U.S.


Table We generally market our products outside of Contents

Third-Party Payor Coverage and Reimbursement

In both the U.S. and foreign markets, our abilitythrough licensing arrangements.


Refer to commercializePart 1, Item 1A—Risk Factors, for discussion of risks associated with government regulations.
Customers
The majority of our product sales are to pharmaceutical wholesalers and product candidates successfully, and to attract commercialization partners for our product and product candidates, dependsdistributors who, in significant part on the availability of adequate financial coverage and reimbursement from third party payors, including, in the U.S., governmental payors such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs, managed care organizations, and private health insurers. Medicare is a federally funded program managed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), through local fiscal intermediaries and carriers that administer coverage and reimbursement for certain healthcare items and services furnished to the elderly and disabled. Medicaid is an insurance program for certain categories of patients whose income and assets fall below state defined levels and who are otherwise uninsured. It is both federally and state funded and managed by each state. The federal government sets general guidelines for Medicaid while each state creates specific regulations that govern its individual program. Each payor has its own process and standards for determining whether it will cover and reimburse a procedure or particular product. Private payors often rely on the lead of the governmental payors in rendering coverage and reimbursement determinations. Therefore, achieving favorable CMS coverage and reimbursement is usually a significant gating issue for successful introduction of a new product. The competitive position of some of our products will depend, in part, upon the extent of coverage and adequacy of reimbursement for such products and for the indications in which such products are used. Prices at which we or our customers seek reimbursement for our product candidates can be subject to challenge, reduction or denial by the government and other payors.

The United States Congress and state legislatures may, from time to time, propose and adopt initiatives aimed at cost containment, which could impact our ability toturn, sell our products profitably. For example, in March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protectionto pharmacies, hospitals and Affordable Care Act as amended by the HealthCare and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which we refer to collectively as the HealthCare Reform Law. This is a sweeping law intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the healthcare industry, and impose additional healthcare policy reforms. Effective October 1, 2010, the HealthCare Reform Law revises the definition of "average manufacturer price" for reporting purposes, which could increase the amount of Medicaid drug rebates paid by drug companies to states once the provision is effective. Further, since 2011, the HealthCare Reform Law imposes a significant annual fee on companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products. Substantial new provisions affecting compliance have also been enacted, which may require us to modify our business practices with healthcare practitioners. We will not know the full effects of the HealthCare Reform Law until applicableother customers, including federal and state agencies issue regulations or guidance under the new law. Although it is too early to determine the effectentities. Each of the HealthCare Reform Law, the new law appears likely to continue to put pressure on pharmaceutical pricing, especially under the Medicare program,three customers, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and may also increase our regulatory burden and operating costs. Moreover, in the coming years, additional changes are likely to be made to governmental healthcare programs that could significantly impact the successMcKesson Corporation, accounted for more than 30% of our total product candidates.

The cost of pharmaceuticals continues to generate substantial governmentalrevenue in 2019, and third party payor interest. We expect that the pharmaceutical industry will experience pricing pressures due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of managed care organizations and additional legislative proposals. Our results of operations could be adversely affected by current and future healthcare reforms. Some third party payors also require pre-approval of coveragecollectively accounted for new or innovative devices or drug therapies before they will reimburse healthcare providers that use such therapies.

While we cannot predict whether any proposed cost-containment measures will be adopted or otherwise implemented in the future, the announcement or adoption of these proposals could have a material


Table of Contents

adverse effect on our ability to obtain adequate prices for our product candidates and operate profitably.

Other HealthCare Laws and Compliance Requirements

In the United States, our activities are potentially subject to statutes and regulation by various federal, state and local authorities in addition to the FDA, including CMS, other divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (e.g., the Office of Inspector General), the United States Department of Justice and individual United States Attorney offices within the Department of Justice, and state and local governments. These statutes and regulations include:


Table of Contents

Depending on the circumstances, failure to comply with these laws and regulations can resulttotal product revenue in penalties, including criminal, civil, and/or administrative criminal penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, exclusion of products from reimbursement under government programs, "qui tam" actions brought by individual whistleblowers in the name of the government, refusal to allow us to enter into supply contracts, including government contracts, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings, any of which could adversely affect our business.

2019.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we employed 363464 full-time employees; 85 employees are engaged in research and development activities and 278 employees are engaged in selling, general and administrative activities.employees. We consider relations with our employees to be good. None of our employees is represented by a labor union.

Internet Information
Our website is www.supernus.com. Through a link on the Investor Relations portion of our website, you can access our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Information contained on our website is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks described below, with all of the other information we include in this report, and the additional information in the other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC" or the "Commission"). These risks may result in material harm to our business, our financial condition, and results of our operations. In this eventuality, the market price of our common stock may decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our BusinessIndustry and Industry

Business

We are dependent on the commercial success of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR.

Our financial performance, including our ability to replace revenue and income lost to generic and other competition as well as to grow our business, depends heavily on the commercial success of our products. A substantial amount of our resources are focused on maintaining and/or expanding the revenue generated by our approved products in the U.S., Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR.

If any of our major products were to become subject to problems, such as changes in prescription growth rates, unexpected side effects, loss of intellectual property protection, supply chain or product supply shortages, regulatory proceedings, changes in labeling, publicity adversely affecting doctor or patient confidence in our product, material product liability litigation, pressure from new or existing competitive products, or adverse changes in coverage under managed care programs, the adverse impact on our revenue and profit could be significant. In addition, our revenue and profit could be significantly impacted by the timing and rate of commercial acceptance of key new products.

Our ability to generate significant product revenue from sales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR in the near term will depend on, among other things, our ability to:

Defend our patents, and intellectual property and products from competition, including generics;

both branded and generic;
Maintain commercial manufacturing arrangements with third-party manufacturers;

Produce, through a validated process, sufficiently large quantities of inventory of our products to meet demand;

Table of Contents

There are no guarantees that we will be successful in completing these tasks. In addition, weWe will need to continue investing substantial financial and management resources to maintain our commercial sales and marketing infrastructure and to recruit and train qualified marketing, sales and other personnel.
Sales of Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR may slow for a variety of reasons, including competing products or safety issues. Any increase in sales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR will be dependent on several factors, including our ability to educate physicians, to increase physician awareness and physician acceptance of the benefits and cost-effectiveness of our products relative to competing products.
Our ability to increase market acceptance of any of our products or to gain market acceptance of approved product candidates among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community will depend on a number of factors, including:
Acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy;
Relative convenience and ease of administration;
Prevalence, nature, and severity of any adverse side effects;
Availability of alternative treatments, including branded and generic products; and
Pricing and cost effectiveness.
Further, Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR are subject to continual review by the FDA. We cannot provide assurance that newly discovered or reported safety issues will not arise. With the use of any marketed drug by a wider patient population, serious AEs may occur from time to time that initially do not appear to be related to the drug itself. Any safety issues could cause us to suspend or to cease marketing of our approved products; cause us to modify how we market our approved products; subject us to substantial liabilities; and adversely affect our revenues and financial condition. In the event of a withdrawal of either Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR from the market, our revenues would decline significantly, and our business would be seriously harmed and could fail.
In addition, we have expressed certain long term revenue expectations. If we are not successful in broadening and/or maintaining the current commercial acceptance of either Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR, such that we cannot achieve those revenue expectations with respect to Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, this could result in a material adverse impact on our anticipated revenue, earnings and liquidity.

Increases

If other versions of extended or controlled release oxcarbazepine or topiramate are approved and successfully commercialized, our business could be materially harmed.
Third parties have and in the future may receive approval to manufacture and market their own versions of extended release oxcarbazepine or topiramate in the U.S. For example, Upsher-Smith launched Qudexy XR (extended release topiramate) and a branded generic version of Qudexy XR in in 2014. Upsher Smith also entered into settlement with a generic company to launch a generic to Qudexy XR in 2020, and a separate settlement with another generic company to enter the market at a date that is unknown to us. Entry of new generic products could adversely impact the sales or prescriptions for Trokendi XR, or could result in an earlier than anticipated entry of generics to compete with Trokendi XR. We have the right to defend our products against third parties who may infringe or are infringing our patents.

In addition, we are aware of companies who are marketing modified-release oxcarbazepine products outside of the U.S., such as Apydan, which was developed by Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH and which requires twice-daily administration. If companies with modified-release oxcarbazepine products outside of the U.S. pursue or obtain approval of their products within the U.S., such competing products may limit the potential success of Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR may slow for a variety of reasons, including competing products or safety issues. If we are notin the U.S. Our business and growth prospects could be materially impaired.
Accordingly, if any third party is successful in broadening the current commercial acceptanceobtaining approval to manufacture and market its own version of either Oxtellar XRextended release oxcarbazepine or Trokendi XR, our business would be harmed.

Any increase in sales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR will be dependent on several factors, including our ability to educate physicians and to increase physician awareness and acceptance of the benefits and cost-effectiveness of our products relative to competing products. Our ability to increase market acceptance of any of our products or gain market acceptance of approved product candidates among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community will depend on a number of factors, including:

In addition, Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR will be subject to continual review by the FDA. We cannot assure that newly discovered or reported safety issues will not arise. With the use of any newly marketed drug by a wider patient population, serious AEs may occur from time to time that initially do not appear to relate to the drug itself. Any safety issues could cause us to suspend or cease marketing of our approved products, cause us to modify how we market our approved products, subject us to substantial liabilities and adversely affect our revenues and financial condition. In the event of a


Table of Contents

withdrawal of either Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR from the market, our revenues would decline significantly and our business would be seriously harmed and could fail.

We are involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our patents. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming. For example, we are involved in several matters related to Paragraph IV Certification Notice Letters that we have received in connection with our products and our collaborators' products. In connection with an ANDA, a Paragraph IV Certification Notice Letter notifies the FDA that one or more patents listedtopiramate in the FDA's Orange Book is alleged to be invalid, unenforceable or will not be infringed by the ANDA product. These matters include claims related to Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, and are discussed in Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings.

In any infringement proceeding, including the foregoing, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patients at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent application at risk of not issuing.

Interference proceedings brought by the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents and patent applications or those of our collaborators. An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if a prevailing party does not offer us a license on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. Litigation or interference proceedings may fail. Even if successful, litigation may result in substantial costs and distraction of our management and other employees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our collaborators, misappropriation of our proprietary rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation.

In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceeding or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, or perceive that the presence or continuation of these cases creates a level of uncertainty regarding our ability to increase or sustain products sales, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that our product candidates will not be subject to the same risks.

We are dependent on obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates and for additional indications for existing products.

Our ability to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates and to obtain additional indications for existing products will depend on, among other things, our ability to:


Table of Contents

There are no guarantees that we will be successful in completing these tasks. If we are unable to successfully complete these tasks,U.S., we may not be able to commercialize any of our other product candidates in a timely manner, or at all, in which case we may be unable to maximize our revenues. In addition, if we experience unanticipated delays or problems, development costs could substantially increase and our business, financial condition and results of operations would likely be adversely affected.

We may not be able to effectively market and sell our product candidates, if approved, in the U.S.

We plan on building our sales and marketing capabilities in the U.S. to commercialize our product candidates, if approved. We will build such capabilities by investing significant amounts of financial and management resources. Furthermore, the cost of establishing and maintaining marketing and sales capabilities may not be justifiable in light of the revenues generated by any of our product candidates.

If we are unable to establish and maintain adequate sales and marketing capabilities for our product candidates or are unable to do so in a timely manner, we may not be able to generate sufficient productprospectively realize revenues from these product candidates to be profitable.

Final marketing approval of any of our product candidatesOxtellar XR or additional indications for existing products by the FDA or other regulatory authorities may be delayed, limited, or denied, any of which would adversely affect our ability to generate operating revenues.

Our business depends on the successful development and commercialization of our product candidates. We are not permitted to market any of our product candidates in the U.S. until we receive approval of an NDA from the FDA, or, in any foreign jurisdiction, from the requisite authority. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is dependent upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. We cannot predict whether or when we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates and we cannot, therefore, predict the timing of any future revenues from these product candidates. In addition, we have received tentative approval from the FDA for Trokendi XR as a treatment for prophylaxis of migraines in adults; however, we cannot predict if, or when, we will obtain full regulatory approval for this indication. Therefore, we cannot predict the timing of any future revenues, if any, from the sale of Trokendi XR for this indication.

The FDA has substantial discretion in the drug approval process, including the ability to delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate or a prior approval supplement for many reasons. For example, the FDA:

XR.

Table of Contents

Notwithstanding the approval of many products by the FDA pursuant to Section 505(b)(1) and 505(b)(2), over the last few years some pharmaceutical companies and others have objected to the FDA's interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA changes its interpretation of Section 505(b)(2), or if the FDA's interpretation is successfully challenged in court, this could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any Section 505(b)(2) application that we submit. Any failure to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates would significantly limit our ability to generate revenues, and any failure to obtain such approval for all of the indications and labeling claims we deem desirable could reduce our potential revenues.

We are subject to uncertainty relating to payment or reimbursement policies which, if not favorable for our products or product candidates, could hinder or prevent our commercial success.

Our business is operating in an ever more challenging environment, with significant pressures by federal and state governments, insurers and other payors on the pricing of our products, affecting on our ability to obtain and maintain satisfactory rates of reimbursement for our products. The U.S. federal and state governments and payors are under intense pressure to control healthcare spending even more tightly than in the past. These pressures are further compounded by consolidation among distributors, retailers, private insurers, managed care organizations and other private payors, resulting in an increase their negotiating power, particularly with respect to our products. In addition, these pressures are augmented by significant controversies and intense publicity about pricing for pharmaceuticals, which are viewed by some as excessive, as well as government investigations and legal proceedings regarding pharmaceutical pricing practices.
Our ability or our collaborators' ability to successfully commercialize our products, including Oxtellar XR, and Trokendi XR, and our product candidates, including SPN-812, will depend in part on the coverage and reimbursement levels set by governmental authorities, private health insurers, managed care organizations and other third-party payors. As a threshold for coverage and reimbursement, third-party payors generally require that drug products be approved for marketing by the FDA. Third-party payors also are increasingly challenging the effectiveness of and prices charged for medical products and services. Government authorities and these third-party payors have attempted to control costs, in some instances, by limiting coverage, andby limiting the amount of reimbursement for particular medications, or by encouraging the use of lower-cost generic products. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for any of the products that we develop and, if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement. Moreover, that level of reimbursement may change over time, as a result of decisions


Table of Contents

made by payors. Reduced or partial payment, or reduced reimbursement coverage, could make our products or product candidates, including Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, less attractive to patients and prescribing physicians. We also may be required to sell our products or product candidates at a significant discount, which would adversely affect our ability to realize an appropriate return on our investment in our products or product candidates or to maintain profitability.

We expect that private insurers and managed care organizations will consider the efficacy, cost effectiveness and safety of our products or product candidates, including Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, in determining whether to approve reimbursement for such products or product candidates, and atto what level.extent they will provide reimbursement. Moreover, they will consider the efficacy and cost effectiveness of comparable or competitive products, including generic products, in making reimbursement decisions for our products. Because each third-party payor individually approves payment or reimbursement, obtaining these approvals can be a time consuming and expensive process, that could requirerequiring us to provide scientific or clinical support for the use of each of our products or product candidates separately to each third-party payor. In some cases, it could take several months or years before a particular private insurer or managed care organization reviews a particular product. We may ultimately be unsuccessful in obtaining coverage. OurIn addition, our competitors may have larger organizations, as well asmore extensive existing business relationships with third-party payors relating to theirthat could have an impact on the coverage for our products.
Our business would be materially adversely affected if we do not receive approval for reimbursement of our products or product candidates from private insurers on a timely or satisfactory basis. Our products and product candidates may not be considered cost-effective, and coverage and reimbursement may not be available or sufficient to allow us to sell our products or product candidates on a profitable basis. Our business would also be adversely affected if private insurers, managed care organizations, the Medicare program or other reimbursing bodies or payors limit the indications for which our products or product candidates will be reimbursed.

In some foreign jurisdictions, particularly Canada and Europe, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to strict governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take six6 to 12 months or longer after the receipt of regulatory approval and product launch. To obtain favorable reimbursement for the indications sought or to obtain pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our products or product candidates, if approved, to other available therapies. If reimbursement for our products or product candidates is unavailable in any country in which reimbursement is sought, limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business could be materially harmed, and could be unprofitable.


In addition, many managed care organizations negotiate the reimbursement price of products and establishthrough the use of formularies, which establish pricing and reimbursement levels. Exclusion of a product from a formulary can lead to its sharply reduced usage in the managed care organization's patient population. If our products or product candidates are not included within an adequate number of managed care formularies or reimbursed at adequate payment or reimbursement levels, or if those policies increasingly favor generic products, our market share and gross margins could be negatively affected, whichaffected. This would have a material adverse effect on our overall business and financial condition.

We expect these challenges to experience pricingcontinue and potentially to intensify in 2020 and following years, as political pressures duemount, and healthcare payors, including government-controlled health authorities, insurance companies and managed care organizations, step up initiatives to potentialreduce the overall cost of healthcare, reforms discussed elsewhere in this Annual Reportrestrict access to higher-priced new medicines, increase the use of generic products and to impose overall price cuts. Such pressures could have a material adverse impact on Form 10-K,our business, financial condition, or results of operations, as well as due to cost control measures instituted by health maintenance organizations.

Our failure to successfully developon our reputation.

We depend on wholesalers and market our product candidates would impair our ability to grow.

As partdistributors for retail distribution of our growth strategy,Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. If we intend to develop and market additional product candidates. We may spend several years completing our development of a particular current or future internal product candidate, during which process we can experience failure at any stage. The product candidates to which we allocate our resources may not be commercially successful. In addition, because our internal


Table of Contents

research capabilities are limited, we may be dependent upon pharmaceutical companies, academic scientists and other researchers to sell or license products or technology to us. The success of this strategy depends partly upon our ability to identify, select, discover and acquire promising pharmaceutical product candidates and approved products.

The process of proposing, negotiating and implementing a license or acquiring a product candidate or approved product is lengthy and complex. Other companies, including some with substantially greater financial, marketing and sales resources, may compete with us for the license or the product candidate or approved product. We have limited resources, including financial resources, to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third-party products, businesses and technologies and to integrate them into our current infrastructure. Moreover, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts. We may not be able to acquire the rights to additional product candidates on terms that we find acceptable, or at all.

In addition, future acquisitions may entail numerous operational and financial risks, including:

Our clinical trials for our product candidates may fail to demonstrate acceptable levels of safety, efficacy or any other requirements, which could prevent or significantly delay regulatory approval.

We may be unable to sufficiently demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates to obtain regulatory approval. We must demonstrate, with substantial evidence gathered in well-controlled studies, to the satisfaction of the relevant regulatory authorities that each product candidate is safe and effective for use in the target indication. We may be required to conduct or perform additional studies or trials to adequately demonstrate safety and efficacy, which could prevent or significantly delay our receipt of regulatory approval, increase clinical costs, and, ultimately delay the commercialization of that product candidate.

Any product candidate that we acquire may require additional development prior to commercial sale, including extensive clinical testing and approval by the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to risks of failure typical of pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory authorities.

In addition, the results from the trials that we have completed for our product candidates may not be replicated in future trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced development, even after promising results in earlier trials. If our product candidates are not shown to be safe and effective, our clinical development programs might be terminated.


Table of Contents

We rely on and will continue to rely on outsourcing arrangements for certain of our activities, including clinical research of our product candidates, manufacturing of our compounds and product candidates beyond Phase II clinical trials and the manufacturing of our commercial products.

We rely on outsourcing arrangements for some of our activities, including manufacturing, preclinical and clinical research, data collection and analysis, and electronic submission of regulatory filings. We may have limited control over these third parties and we cannot guarantee that they will perform their obligations in an effective, competent and timely manner. Our reliance on third parties, including third-party clinical research organizations (CROs) and CMOs, entails risks including, but not limited to:

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production oflose any of our productssignificant wholesalers or product candidates beyond Phase II clinical trials, nor do we have plans in the foreseeable future to developdistributors, our own manufacturing operations for Phase III clinical materials or commercial products. We currently depend on third-party CMOs for allbusiness could be harmed.

The majority of our required raw materials and drug substance for our preclinical research and clinical trials. Forsales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR we currently rely on single source suppliersare made to wholesalers and distributors who, in turn, sell our products to pharmacies, hospitals and other customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, three wholesale pharmaceutical distributors, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and McKesson Corporation, each individually accounted for raw materials, including API, and rely on third-party suppliers and manufacturers for the final commercial products. If any of these vendors are unable to perform their obligations to us, including due to violations of the FDA's requirements, our ability to meet regulatory requirements, projected timelines, necessary quality standards for successful manufacturemore than 30% of our developmenttotal revenue in 2019, and commercialization product would be adversely affected. Further, if we were required to change vendors, it could resultcollectively accounted for more than 90% of our total revenue in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs. Accordingly, the2019. The loss of any of our currentthese wholesale pharmaceutical distributors' accounts, or future third-party manufacturers or suppliersa material reduction in their purchases, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

In addition, these wholesale customers comprise a significant part of the distribution network for pharmaceutical products in the U.S. This distribution network has undergone, and may continue to undergo, significant consolidation marked by mergers and acquisitions. As a result, a small number of large wholesale distributors control a significant share of the market. Consolidation of drug wholesalers has increased. This may result in increased competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical products. We have entered into supply agreements for bothcannot assure you that we can manage these pricing pressures, or that wholesaler purchases will not fluctuate unexpectedly from period to period.
Our sales of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR with leading CMOs headquartered in North America forcan be greatly affected by the manufactureinventory levels our respective wholesalers and distributors carry. We monitor wholesaler and distributor inventory of the final commercial products. However, there is a risk that the counterparties to these agreements will not perform their respective obligations or will terminate these agreements. We could also become embroiled in disputes with third party manufacturers for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR regarding the termsusing a combination of methods. Pursuant to distribution service agreements with our agreements, the performance of a CMO or intellectual property rights, any of which could disrupt the sales of our products and adversely affect our reputation andthree largest wholesale customers, we receive product revenue. In addition,inventory reports. For other wholesalers where we do not have contractual relationshipsreceive inventory reports, our estimates of wholesaler inventories may differ significantly from actual inventory levels. Significant differences between actual and estimated inventory levels may result in excessive production, resulting in our holding substantial quantities of unsold inventory, or alternatively inadequate supplies of product in distribution channels, resulting in inability to support sales at the retail level. These changes may cause our revenues to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and in some cases may cause our operating results for a particular quarter to be below our expectations, the manufactureexpectations of commercial suppliessecurities analysts and/or investors.
At times, wholesalers and distributors may increase inventory levels in response to anticipated price increases, resulting in greater wholesaler purchases prior to the anticipated price increase, and reduced wholesaler purchases in later quarters. This may cause substantial fluctuations in our results of operations from period to period. If our financial results are below expectations for alla particular period, the market price of our common stock may drop significantly.
We may not be able to effectively market and sell our product candidates, if approved, in the U.S.
We plan on building our sales and marketing capabilities in the U.S. to commercialize our product candidates, if approved. We will build such capabilities by investing significant amounts of financial and management resources. Furthermore, the cost of establishing and maintaining marketing and sales capabilities may not be economically justifiable, in light of the revenues generated by any of our product candidates. The number of third-party manufacturers with the expertise, required regulatory approvals
If we are unable to establish and facilitiesmaintain adequate sales and marketing capabilities for our product candidates; if we are unable to manufacture drug substance and final drug product ondo so in a commercial scale is limited. Therefore,timely manner, we may not be able to enter into such arrangements with third-party manufacturers in a timely manner,generate sufficient product revenues from our product candidates to be profitable.

Final marketing approval of any of our product candidates, or approval of additional indications for existing products by the FDA or by other regulatory authorities may be delayed, limited, or denied, any of which would adversely affect our ability to generate operating revenues.
We are dependent on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to secure such contractual arrangements would harmobtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates and approval for additional indications for existing products. Our business depends on the commercial prospects forsuccessful clinical development; i.e., successful completion of clinical trials and commercialization of our product candidates. Our costsWe are not permitted to market any of our product candidates in the U.S. until we receive approval of an NDA from the FDA, or in any foreign jurisdiction, from the requisite authority. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is dependent upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product, and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. We cannot predict whether or when we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates. We cannot, therefore, predict the timing of any future revenues from these product candidates.
The FDA has substantial discretion in the drug approval process, including the ability to delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate or deny a prior approval supplement (1) for many reasons. For example, the FDA:
Could reject or delay the marketing application for an NCE;
Could determine that we cannot rely on Section 505(b)(2) for any approval of our product candidates;
Could determine that the information provided by us was inadequate, contained clinical deficiencies, or otherwise failed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of any of our product candidates for a specific indication;
May not find the data from bioequivalence studies and/or clinical trials sufficient to support the submission of an NDA, or to obtain marketing approval in the U.S., including any findings that the clinical and other benefits of our product candidates do not outweigh their safety risks;
May disagree with our trial design or our interpretation of data from preclinical studies, bioequivalence studies and/or clinical trials, or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our trials; the outcome and measurement scale used in the trials; or the clinical protocols whether with or without a special protocol assessment process;
May determine that we have identified the wrong reference listed drug or drugs, or that approval of our Section 505(b)(2) application of our product candidate is blocked by patent or non-patent exclusivity of the reference listed drug or drugs;
May identify deficiencies in the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we enter into agreements for the supply of raw materials, including the API or formulated product used in our product candidates, wherein those deficiencies may result in interruption in the ability to supply product;
May approve our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, or may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-approval clinical trials;
May change its approval policies or adopt new regulations;
May not approve the labeling claims that we believe are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates, or may approve them with warnings and precautions that could increaselimit the acceptance of our product candidates and their commercial success; or
May not approve the addition of new indications to the label of our existing products.

_______________________
(1) Changes that have a substantial potential to have an adverse effect on product quality, identify strength, purity or potency (i.e., major change) require submission of a "prior approval supplement" and approval by FDA prior to distribution of the drug product made using the change.

Notwithstanding the approval of many products by the FDA pursuant to Sections 505(b)(1) and 505(b)(2), over the last few years some pharmaceutical companies and others have objected to the FDA's interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA changes its interpretation of Section 505(b)(2), or if the FDA's interpretation is successfully challenged in court, this could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any Section 505(b)(2) application that we submit. Any failure to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates would eliminate our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.


Table of Contents

Delays or failures in the completion of clinical development of our product candidates would increase our costs and delay or limit our ability to generate revenues.

Delays or failures in the completion of clinical trials for our product candidates could significantly raise our product development costs. We do not know whether current or planned trials will be completed on schedule, if at all. The commencement and completion of clinical development can be delayed or halted for a number of reasons, including:

Clinical trials may be suspended or terminated by us, at a trial site by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) or ethics committee overseeing the clinical trial, the FDA, or other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including:

Failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or the trial protocols may result in the inability to use the trial data to support product approval. Changes in regulatory requirementsindications and guidance may occur, andlabeling claims we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmitdeem desirable could reduce our clinical trial protocols to IRBs or ethics committees for reexamination, which may adversely impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial.

In addition, many of the factors that cause or lead to a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we experience delays in completion of, or if we terminate any of our clinical trials, our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates may be materially harmed, and our commercial prospects and ability to generate product revenues diminished.


Table of Contents

If other versions of extended or controlled release oxcarbazepine or topiramate are approved and successfully commercialized, our business could be materially harmed.

Third parties have and may receive approval to manufacture and market their own versions of extended release oxcarbazepine or topiramate anti-epileptic drugs in the U.S. For example, Upsher-Smith launched Qudexy XR (extended release topiramate) and its own authorized generic, both of which compete with Trokendi XR. Since Trokendi XR was not granted marketing exclusivity by the FDA, we may not be able to prevent the submission or approval of another full NDA for any competitor's extended or controlled release topiramate product candidate. However, we do have the right to defend our products against third parties who may infringe or are infringing our patents.

In addition, we are aware of companies who are marketing modified-release oxcarbazepine products outside of the U.S., such as Apydan, which is developed by Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH and requires twice-daily administration. If companies with modified-release oxcarbazepine products outside of the U.S. pursue or obtain approval of their products within the U.S., such competing products may limit the potential success of Oxtellar XR in the U.S., and our business and growth prospects would be materially impaired. Accordingly, if any third party is successful in obtaining approval to manufacture and market its own version of extended release oxcarbazepine or topiramate in the U.S., we may not be able to recover expenses incurred in connection with the development of or prospectively realize revenues from Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR.

If we do not obtain marketing exclusivity for our product candidates, our business may suffer.

Under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, three years of marketing exclusivity may be granted for the approval of new and supplemental NDAs, including Section 505(b)(2) applications, for, among other things, new indications, dosage forms, routes of administration, strengths of an existing drug or for a new use, if the new clinical investigations that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are determined by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application. This exclusivity, which is sometimes referred to as clinical investigation exclusivity, prevents the FDA from approving an application under Section 505(b)(2) for the same conditions of use associated with the new clinical investigations before the expiration of three years from the date of approval. Such exclusivity, however, would not prevent the approval of another application if the applicant submits a Section 505(b)(1) NDA and has conducted its own adequate, well-controlled clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy, nor would it prevent approval of a generic product or Section 505(b)(2) product that did not incorporate the exclusivity-protected changes of the approved drug product.

Under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, newly-approved drugs and indications may also benefit from a statutory period of non-patent marketing exclusivity. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments provide five-year marketing exclusivity to the first applicant to gain approval of an NDA for an NCE, meaning that the FDA has not previously approved any other drug containing the same API, or active moiety, which is the molecule responsible for the action of the drug substance. Although protection under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments will not prevent the submission or approval of another full Section 505(b)(1) NDA, such an NDA applicant would be required to conduct its own preclinical and adequate, well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.

While the FDA granted a three year marketing exclusivity period for Oxtellar XR, it did not grant a similar marketing exclusivity period for Trokendi XR. If we are unable to obtain marketing exclusivity for our subsequent product candidates, then our competitors may obtain approval of competing products more easily than if we had such marketing exclusivity, and our future revenues could be reduced, possibly materially.

revenues.

Table of Contents

Our products and product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other characteristics that limit their commercial potential or delay or prevent their regulatory approval.

Undesirable side effects caused by any of our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt development and could result in the denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, and result in potential product liability claims. Undesirable side effects caused by any of our products could cause regulatory authorities to temporarily or permanently halt product sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business as a whole.

Immediate release oxcarbazepine and topiramate products, which use the same active pharmaceutical ingredients as Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, are known to cause various side effects, including but not limited to dizziness, paresthesia, headaches, cognitive deficiencies such as memory loss and speech impediment, digestive problems, somnolence, double vision, gingival enlargement, nausea, weight gain, oral malformation birth defects, visual field defects, infant small for gestational age and fatigue. The use of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR may cause similar side effects as compared to their reference products, or may cause additional or different side effects.

If our products cause side effects or if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by our products or product candidates, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining the commercial success of our products and product candidates and could substantially increase commercialization costs.

We may not be able to manage our business effectively if we are unable to attract, motivate and retain key members of our management team.

We may not be able to attract or motivate qualified management and scientific and clinical personnel in the future due to the intense competition for qualified personnel among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and other businesses. Our industry has experienced a high rate of turnover of management personnel in recent years. If we are not able to attract and motivate necessary personnel to accomplish our business objectives, we may experience constraints that will significantly impede the achievement of our objectives.

We are highly dependent on the development, regulatory, commercial and financial expertise of our management, particularly Jack A. Khattar, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Khattar has an employment agreement and other members of the senior management team have executive retention agreements. If we lose key members of our management team, we may not be able to find


Table of Contents

suitable replacements in a timely fashion, if at all. We cannot be certain that future management transitions will not disrupt our operations or generate concern among employees and those with whom we do business.

In addition to competition for personnel, our corporate offices are located in the greater Washington D.C. metropolitan area, an area that is characterized by a high cost of living. As such, we could have difficulty attracting experienced personnel to our Company and may be required to expend significant financial resources in our employee recruitment efforts.

If our competitors develop or market alternatives for treatments of our target indications, our commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated.

The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary therapeutics. We face competition from a number of sources, some of which may target the same indications as our products and product candidates, including large pharmaceutical companies, smaller pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies and private and public research institutions. The availability of new products or approval for new indications for existing products may limit the demand for and the price we are able to charge for any of our products. We may be unable to differentiate our products from competitive offerings. In addition to competition with our currently marketed products, we anticipate that we will face intense competition when our pipeline product candidates are approved by regulatory authorities and we begin the commercialization process for these products.

There are currently no marketed products and no known products in development for the treatment of IA in patients with ADHD, autism, or PTSD. However, the off-label use of risperidone (Risperdal) and aripiprazole (Abilify) is common. These products are approved for irritability in autism which, as a result, may influence use of products to treat IA in patients with ADHD.

In addition, we are aware of several companies have various product candidates under development for ADHD which may compete with our SPN-812 product candidate. Such companies include Alcobra, Sunovion, Neos Therapeutics, and Neurovance.

Further new developments, including the development of other drug technologies, may render our products or product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive. As a result, our products and product candidates may become obsolete before we recover expenses incurred in connection with their development or realize revenues from commercialization. Further, many competitors have substantially greater:

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products more rapidly than we are able to or may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit or block us from developing or commercializing our product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are more effective, more useful, better tolerated, subject to fewer or less severe side


Table of Contents

effects, more widely prescribed or accepted or less costly than ours and may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products. If we are unable to compete effectively with the products of our competitors or if such competitors are successful in developing products that compete with any of our product candidates that are approved, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects may be materially and adversely affected. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry may result in even more resources being concentrated at competitors. Competition may increase further as a result of advances made in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment.

Our products and our product candidates may be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market. We may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements.

Even though U.S. regulatory approval has been obtained for Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, the FDA may still impose significant restrictions on their indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for costly post-approval studies. Our product candidates would also be, and our approved product and our collaborators' approved products are, subject to ongoing FDA requirements governing the labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and submission of safety and other information. In addition, manufacturers of drug products and their facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP regulations. If we, our collaborators or a regulatory authority discovers previously unknown problems with a product, including side effects that are unanticipated in severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, a regulatory authority may impose restrictions on that product or the manufacturer, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing. If we or our collaborators, or our or our collaborators' approved products or product candidates, or the manufacturing facilities for our or our collaborators' approved products or product candidates fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory authority may:

In addition, our product labeling, advertising and promotion of our approved products, are subject to regulatory requirements and continuing regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about prescription products. In particular, a product may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in the product's approved labeling. Notwithstanding, physicians may nevertheless prescribe our products to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label, which is known as "off label use". The FDA and other authorities actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant sanctions. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. If we are found to have promoted off-label uses, we may be enjoined from such off-label promotion and become


Table of Contents

subject to significant liability, which would have an adverse effect on our reputation, business and revenues, if any.

If we fail to produce our products and product candidates in the volumes that we require on a timely basis, or fail to comply with stringent regulations applicable to pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, we may face delays in the development and commercialization of our products and product candidates, or be required to withdraw our products from the market.

We do not currently own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of any of our products or for the commercial production of our product candidates, nor do we have plans to develop our own manufacturing operations forat commercial productsscale in the foreseeable future. We currently depend on third-party contract manufacturersCMOs in various countries for the supply of the APIsAPI for our products and product candidates, including drug substance for our preclinical research and clinical trials. For Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, we currently rely on single source suppliers for raw materials, including API. We rely onAPI, as well as single manufacturerssource suppliers to produce and package final dosage forms. With respect to product candidates, we currently rely on Bachem Americas, Inc. and Bachem AG (collectively Bachem), a company based in Switzerland, as the sole supplier and manufacturer for viloxazine hydrochloride raw material, the API in SPN-812.
There is a risk that supplies of our products or product candidates may be significantly delayed by or may become unavailable as a result of manufacturing, equipment, process, or business-related issues affecting our suppliers. Any future curtailment in the availability of raw materials could result in production or other delays, with consequent adverse business effects. In addition, because regulatory authorities must generally approve raw material sources for pharmaceutical products, changes in raw material suppliers may result in production delays or higher raw material costs.

Accordingly, as it relates to SPN-812, for example, we may encounter additional manufacturing and supply-chain risks due to the regulatory and political structure of Switzerland, or as a result of the international relationship between Switzerland and the U.S.

The manufacture of pharmaceutical products requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. Pharmaceutical companies often encounter difficulties in manufacturing, particularly in scaling up production of their products. These problems include manufacturing difficulties relating tocan adversely affect production costs and yields, quality control, stability of the product and quality assurance testing, shortages of qualified personnel, as well as compliance with federal, state and foreign regulations. If we are unable to demonstrate stability in accordance with commercial requirements, or if our manufacturers were to encounter difficulties or otherwise fail to comply with their obligations to us, our ability to maintainobtain or obtainmaintain FDA approval and to market our products and product candidates, respectively, would be jeopardized. In addition, any delay or interruption in producing clinical trial supplies could delay or prohibit the completion of our clinical trials, increase the costs associated with conducting our clinical trials and, depending upon the period of delay, require us to commence new trials, at significant additional expense, or to terminate a trial.

Manufacturers of pharmaceutical products need to comply with cGMP requirements and other requirements as enforced by the FDA, including electronic tracking and submission. These requirements include quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturers of our products and product candidates may be unable to comply with these cGMP requirements and with other FDA and similar foreign regulatory requirements. A failureFailure to comply with these requirements may result in fines and civil penalties, suspension of production, suspension or delay in product approval, product seizure or recall, or withdrawal of product approval. If the safety of any of our products or product candidates is compromised due to failure to adhere to applicable laws, or for other reasons, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for such product candidate, or to successfully commercialize such products, and weproducts. We may be held liable for any injuries sustained as a result. Any of these factors could cause a delay in clinical development, regulatory submissions, approvals or commercialization of our product candidates, entail higher costs, or result in our being unable to effectively commercialize our product candidates. Furthermore, if we fail to obtain the required commercial quantities on a timely basis from our suppliers and at commercially reasonable prices, we may be unable to meet demand for our approved products, and consequently lose potential revenues.

or may not be able to sell our products profitably.

Table

If we do not obtain marketing exclusivity for our product candidates, our business may suffer.
Under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, three years of Contents

marketing exclusivity may be granted for the approval of new and sNDAs, including Section 505(b)(2) applications, for, among other things, new indications, dosage forms, routes of administration, strengths, or for a new use of an existing drug. If the clinical investigations that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are determined by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application, the FDA may grant exclusivity for the product, sometimes referred to as clinical investigation exclusivity. This prevents the FDA from approving an application under Section 505(b)(2) for the same conditions of use for new clinical investigations prior to the expiration of three years from the date of approval. Such exclusivity, however, would not prevent the approval of another application if the applicant submits a full NDA, and has conducted its own adequate, well-controlled clinical trials, demonstrating safety and efficacy. It would not prevent approval of a generic product or Section 505(b)(2) product that did not incorporate the exclusivity-protected changes of the approved drug product.

Under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, newly-approved drugs and indications may also benefit from a statutory period of non-patent marketing exclusivity. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments provide five-year marketing exclusivity to the first applicant to gain approval of an NDA for an NCE. This would be the case if the FDA had not previously approved any other drug containing the same API, or active moiety, which is the molecule responsible for the action of the drug substance. Although protection under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments will not prevent the submission or approval of another full NDA, such an NDA applicant would be required to conduct its own preclinical and adequate, well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
While the FDA granted a three year marketing exclusivity period for Oxtellar XR, it did not grant a similar marketing exclusivity period for Trokendi XR.
In November 2019, we submitted the NDA for SPN-812 to the FDA. We expect SPN-812, if approved, to have a five year market exclusivity, given its NCE status in the U.S. If we are unable to obtain marketing exclusivity for our subsequent product candidates, then our competitors may obtain approval for competing products more easily than if we had such marketing exclusivity. In such an event, our future revenues could be reduced, possibly materially.
If the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities approve generic products that compete with any of our products or product candidates, the sales of those products or product candidates would be adversely affected.

Once an NDA, including a Section 505(b)(2) application, is approved, the product covered thereby becomes a "listed drug" which can be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an ANDA. The FDCA, FDA regulations and other applicable regulations and policies provide incentives to manufacturers to create modified, non-infringing versions of a drug to facilitate the approval of an ANDA or other application for generic substitutes. These manufacturers might only be required to conduct a relatively inexpensive study to show that their product has the same active ingredient(s), dosage form, strength, route of administration, and conditions of use or labeling, as our product or product candidate and that the generic product is bioequivalent to our product. Bioequivalence implies that a product is absorbed in the body at the same rate and to the same extent as our product or product candidate. These generic equivalents, which must meet the same quality standards as branded pharmaceuticals, would be significantly less costly than ours to bring to market. Companies that produce generic equivalents are generally able to offer their products at significantly lower prices. Thus, regardless of the regulatory approval pathway, after the introduction of a generic competitor, a significant percentage of the sales of any branded product are typically lost to the generic product, through both price and volume erosion. Accordingly, competition from generic equivalents would adversely, materially, permanently and adverselypermanently impact our revenues, profitability and cash flows andfrom those products. In this eventuality, it would substantially limit our ability to obtain a return on the investments we have made in our products and product candidates.
If our competitors develop or market alternatives for treatment of our target indications, our commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated.
The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense product-driven competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary therapeutics. We face competition from a number of sources, some of which may target the same indications as our products and product candidates. These include large pharmaceutical companies, smaller pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies and private and public research institutions. The availability of new products or the approval of new indications for existing products may limit the demand for and the price we are able to charge for any of our products. We may be unable to differentiate our products from competitive offerings.
In addition to competition for our currently marketed products, we anticipate that we will face intense competition when our pipeline product candidates are approved by regulatory authorities, and we begin their commercialization process. In particular, we are aware of several companies that have various product candidates under development to treat ADHD. These may compete with our SPN-812 product candidate. These companies include Sunovion, Ironshore/Highland and Otsuka.

New developments, including the development of other drug technologies, may render our products or product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive. As a result, our products and product candidates may become obsolete before we recover expenses incurred in connection with their development, or we realize revenues from their commercialization. Moreover, many competitors have substantially greater:
Capital resources;
Research and development resources and experience, including personnel and technology;
Drug development, clinical trial and regulatory resources and experience, including personnel and technology;
Sales and marketing resources and experience;
Manufacturing and distribution resources and experience;
Name recognition; and
Resources, experience and expertise in prosecution and enforcement of intellectual property rights.
As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products more rapidly than we are able to, or may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit or block us from developing or commercializing our product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are more effective, have faster onset to action, better tolerated, subject to fewer or less severe side effects, more widely prescribed or accepted, or less costly than ours. They may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products. If we are unable to compete effectively with the products of our competitors, or if such competitors are successful in developing products that compete with any of our approved product candidates, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects may be materially and adversely affected. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry may result in even higher level of resources being concentrated at competitors. Competition may intensify as discloseda result of advances made in the commercial applicability of technologies, and as a result of greater availability of capital for investment.
Our products and our product candidates may be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market. We may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements.
Even though U.S. regulatory approval has been obtained for Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, the FDA may impose significant restrictions on their indicated uses, or may impose restrictions on marketing, or may impose requirements for costly post-approval studies. For example, both Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR were approved on the basis of post-approval commitments, including the development of additional age-appropriate formulations of the drugs, and the conduct of post-approval clinical studies in accordance with timelines laid out in the approval letters. The post-approval commitments required the creation of new drug product formulations, which we have not been able to accomplish. Despite significant efforts, in certain cases we have been unable to meet the FDA's timelines. Refer to Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings1—Post-approval Regulatory Requirements for more information. To date, the only consequence of this Annual Reportour failure to meet our PREA commitment deadlines has been a notation on Form 10-K, we received Paragraph IV Notice Letters against our Oxtellar XR andFDA websites, making the status of PREA publicly known.
We are also required to conduct an additional post-approval study with respect to Trokendi XR Orange Book patentsfor the treatment of prophylaxis of migraine. If we do not meet our post-marketing commitments, and are unable to show good cause for our inability to adhere to the timetables laid out in the approval letters, the FDA could take enforcement action against us, including withdrawal of approval. While we believe that we can show good cause for our inability to meet the timelines for our post-approval study requirements, the FDA may disagree. Refer to Part I, Item 1—Post-approval Regulatory Requirements for more information.
Our products, product candidates and our collaborators' approved products are subject to ongoing FDA requirements governing the labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and submission of safety and other information. In addition, manufacturers of drug products and their facilities are subject to continual review and to periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) regulations. If we, our collaborators, or a regulatory authority discovers previously unknown problems with a product, including side effects that are unanticipated in severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, a regulatory authority may impose restrictions on that product or on the manufacturer, including requiring withdrawal of the product from several generic drug makers. Wethe market or suspension of manufacturing.
If we or our collaborators, or our products, product candidates, or our collaborators' products, or the manufacturing facilities for our products, product candidates or our collaborators' products fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory authority may:
Issue warning letters or untitled letters;
Impose civil or criminal penalties;

Suspend regulatory approval;
Suspend any ongoing bioequivalence and/or clinical trials;
Refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to applications filed by us;
Impose restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements, or suspend production for a lawsuit against eachsustained period of these drug makers alleging infringementtime; or
Seize or detain products or require us to initiate a product recall.
In addition, our product labeling, advertising, and promotion of our Oxtellar XRapproved products are subject to regulatory requirements and Trokendi XR patents.continuing regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about prescription products. In October 2015,particular, a product may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA, as reflected in the product's approved labeling. Notwithstanding, physicians may nevertheless prescribe products to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label, which is known as "off label use". The FDA and other authorities actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have promoted off-label use may be subject to significant sanctions. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion, and has enjoined companies from engaging in off-label promotion. If we reached a settlement agreement with oneare found to have promoted off-label use, we may be enjoined from such off-label promotion and become subject to significant liability. This could have an adverse effect on our reputation, business and revenues.
Further, the FDA's policies may prospectively change. Additional government regulations may be enacted that could affect our products or prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of these generic drug makers, Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., concerning our Trokendi XR patents. In 2016, the U.S. District Court and Federal Court of Appeals ruled in our favor against Actavis concerning Oxtellar XR patents. In March 2017, we signed settlement agreements with two other generic drug makers, Actavis and Zydus, concerning our Trokendi XR patents. While we intend to vigorously defend our product rights against TWi concerning Oxtellar XR patents,candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in the event thatexisting requirements, or to adopt new requirements or policies, or if we are not successfulable to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we have obtained, adversely affecting our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.
We depend on collaborators to work with us to develop, manufacture and commercialize their and our products and product candidates.
We have a license agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation to use one of our proprietary technologies in an oral formulation of treprostinil diethanolamine, or treprostinil, for the lawsuit,treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, and other indications. United Therapeutics Corporation launched Orenitram (treprostinil) in 2014, which triggered payment of a milestone payment to us of $2.0 million. In the third quarter of 2014, we received a cash payment of $30.0 million from HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P.'s (HC Royalty), for the purchase of certain of our rights under our license agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation related to the commercialization of Orenitram. Ownership of the royalty rights will return to us if/when a certain cumulative threshold payment to HC Royalty is reached. We are entitled to receive milestones and royalties for use of this formulation in indications other than arterial hypertension. If we materially breach any of our obligations under the license agreement, we could lose the right to receive any future sales of Oxtellar XR willroyalty payments thereunder, which could be significantly, adversely and permanently affected by competition from this generic drug.

financially significant to us.

We intend to rely on third-party collaborators to market and commercialize our products and product candidates outside the U.S., who may fail to effectively commercialize our products and product candidates.

Outside We utilize strategic partners outside the U.S., we utilize strategic partners where appropriate, to assist in the commercialization of our products and product candidates. We currently possess limited resources, and may not be successful in establishing collaborations or licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, if at all. We also face competition in our search for collaborators and licensing partners. By entering into strategic collaborations or similar arrangements, we will rely on third parties for financial resources andto financially support their local operations, including support required for development, commercialization, sales, and marketing and regulatory expertise. Our collaborators may fail to develop or effectively commercialize our products or product candidates because they cannot obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, they lack adequate financial or other resources or they decide to focus on other initiatives. Any failure of our third-party collaborators to successfully market and commercialize our products or product candidates outside the U.S. would diminish our revenues and harm our results of operations.

Limitations on our patent rights relating to our products and product candidates may limit our ability to prevent third parties from competing against us.

To a significant degree, our success will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for our proprietary technologies and our products and product candidates, preserve our trade secrets,


Table of Contents

prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights and operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. To that end, we seek patent protection in the U.S. and internationally for our products and product candidates. Our policy is to actively seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other things, filing patent applications in the U.S. and abroad (including Europe, Canada and certain other countries when appropriate) relating to proprietary technologies that are important to the development of our business.

The strength of patents in the pharmaceutical industry involves complex legal and scientific questions and can have uncertain results. Patent applications in the U.S. and most other countries are confidential for a period of time until they are published, and publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature typically lags actual discoveries by several months or more. As a result, we cannot be certain that we were the first to conceive inventions covered by our patents and pending patent applications or that we were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. In addition, we cannot be certain that our patent applications will be granted, that any issued patents will adequately protect our intellectual property or that such patents will not be challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented.

We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position, which we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees and our collaborators and consultants. We also have agreements with our employees and selected consultants that obligate them to assign their inventions to us. It is possible that technology relevant to our business will be independently developed by a person that is not a party to such an agreement. Furthermore, if the employees and consultants that are parties to these agreements breach or violate the terms of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies, and we could lose our trade secrets through such breaches or violations. Further, our trade secrets could otherwise become known or be independently discovered by our competitors. Any failure to adequately prevent disclosure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information could have a material adverse impact on our business.

In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the U.S., and therefore we may encounter problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property in certain foreign jurisdictions.

If we are sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, it could be costly and time consuming to defend such a suit. An unfavorable outcome in that litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our approved products and our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we and our collaborators are developing product candidates. As the pharmaceutical industry expands and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our collaborators' approved products or our product candidates may give rise to claims of infringement of the patent rights of others. There may be issued patents of third parties of which we are currently unaware that may be infringed by our collaborators' approved products or Oxtellar XR or Trokendi XR, which could prevent us from being able to maximize revenue generated by our products or our product candidates. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications which may later result in issued patents that our collaborators' approved products or our product candidates may infringe.

We may be exposed to, or threatened with, future litigation by third parties alleging that our collaborators' approved products or our products or product candidates infringe their intellectual


Table of Contents

property rights. If one of our collaborators' approved products or our products or product candidates is found to infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party, we or our collaborators could be enjoined by a court and required to pay damages. We could be unable to commercialize the applicable approved products and product candidates unless we obtain a license to the patent. A license may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, during litigation, the patent holder could obtain a preliminary injunction or other equitable relief which could prohibit us from making, using or selling our approved products prior to a trial. Such a trial may not occur for several years.

There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry generally. If a third party claims that we or our collaborators infringe its intellectual property rights, we may face a number of issues, including, but not limited to:

We depend on collaborators to work with us to develop, manufacture and commercialize their and our products and product candidates.

We have a license agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation to use one of our proprietary technologies for an oral formulation of treprostinil diethanolamine, or treprostinil, for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension,activities, as well as for other indications. United Therapeutics Corporation launched Orenitram (treprostinil)expertise in 2014, which triggered a milestone payment to useach of $2.0 million. In the third quarter of 2014, we received a cash payment of $30.0 million as a result of HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P.'s (HC Royalty) purchase of certain of our rights under our license agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation related to the commercialization of Orenitram. We will retain full ownership of the royalty rights if a certain cumulative threshold payment to HC Royalty is reached. We are entitled to receive milestones and royalties for use of this formulation in other indications. If we materially breach any of our obligations under the license agreement, we could lose the right to receive any future royalty payments thereunder, which could be financially significant to us.

those subject areas.

Our future collaboration agreements may have the effect of limitinglimit the areas of research and development that we may pursue, either alone or in collaboration with third parties. Much of the potential revenues from these future collaborations may consist of contingent payments, such as payments for achieving certain development milestones, and royalties payable on sales of developed products.product sales. The milestonemilestones and royalty revenues that we may receive under these collaborations will depend upon our collaborators' ability to successfully develop, introduce, market and sell new products. Future


Table of Contents

collaboration partners may fail to develop or effectively commercialize products using our products, product candidates or technologies because they, among other things, may:

Change the focus of their development and commercialization efforts, or may have insufficient resources to effectively develop our product candidates.
Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies historically have re-evaluated their development and commercialization priorities following mergers and consolidations, which have been common in recent years. The ability of some of our product candidates to reach their potential could be limited if our future collaborators decrease or fail to increaseapply sufficient development or commercialization efforts related to those product candidates;


Decide not to devote the necessary resources due to internal constraints, such as limited personnel with the requisite scientific expertise, or limited cash resources, or in the belief that other internal drug development programs may have a higher likelihood of obtaining marketing approval, or may potentially generate a greater return on investment;

Develop and commercialize, either alone or with others, drugs that are similar to or competitive with the product candidates that are the subject of their collaboration with us;

Not have necessary and sufficient resources necessary to carrydevelop the product candidate through clinical development, marketing approval and commercialization;

Fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements;

Be
Are unable to obtain the necessary marketing approvals; or

Breach or terminate their arrangement with us.

If collaboration partners fail to develop or fail to effectively commercialize our products for any of these reasons, we may not be able to replace the collaboration partner with another partner to develop and commercialize the product under the terms of the collaboration.collaboration, if at all. Further, even if we are able to replace the collaboration partner, we may not be able to do so on commercially favorable terms. As a result, the development and commercialization of the affected product or product candidate could be delayed, curtailedimpaired, or terminated because we may not have sufficient financial resources or capabilities to continue development and commercialization of the product candidate on our own.

We have in-licensed or acquired a portion Failure of our intellectual property necessarythird-party collaborators to develop certain ofsuccessfully market and commercialize our psychiatry product candidates. If we fail to comply with our obligations under any of these arrangements, we could lose such licensesproducts or intellectual property rights.

We are a party to and rely on several arrangements with third parties, such as those with Afecta and Rune, which give us rights to intellectual property that is necessary for the development of certain of our product candidates including SPN-810within and SPN-809, respectively. In addition, we may enter into similar arrangements inoutside the future for other product candidates. Our current arrangements impose various development, financialU.S. could materially diminish our revenues and other obligations on us. If we materially breach these obligations or if Afecta or Rune fail to adequately perform their respective obligations, these exclusive arrangements could be terminated, which would result inharm our inability to develop, manufacture and sell products that are covered by such intellectual property.

results of operations.

Even if our product candidates receive regulatory approval in the U.S., we or our collaborators may nevernot receive approval to commercialize our product candidates outside of the U.S.

To market any productsproduct outside of the U.S., we must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other regulatory jurisdictions regarding safety and efficacy. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions, and can involve product testing and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the U.S. The time required to obtain approval in other jurisdictions might


Table of Contents

differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. The regulatory approval process in other jurisdictions may include all of the risks detailed above regarding FDA approval in the U.S., as well as other risks. For example, legislation analogous to Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA in the U.S., which relates to the ability of an NDA applicant to use published data not developed by such applicant, may not exist in other countries. In territories where data isare not freely available, we may not have the ability to commercialize our products without first negotiating rights fromwith third parties to obtain their permission to refer to their clinical data in our regulatory applications, whichapplications. This process could require the expenditure of significant additional funds and time.

In addition, regulatory approval in one jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but aanother. A failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory processes in others. Failure to obtain regulatory approvalsapproval in other jurisdictions, or any delay or setback in obtaining such approvals, could have the same adverse effects as detailed above regarding FDA approval. As described above, such effects include the risks that any of our product candidates may not be approved for all requested indications, requested, which could limit the uses of our product candidates, and could have an adverse effect on their commercial potential or could require costly post-marketing studies.

Guidelines

We have in-licensed or acquired a portion of our intellectual property necessary to develop certain of our product candidates. If we fail to comply with our obligations under any of these arrangements, we could lose such licenses or intellectual property rights.
We are a party to and recommendations publishedrely on several arrangements with third parties. These arrangements give us rights to IP that are necessary for the development of certain of our product candidates. In addition, we may enter into similar arrangements in the future for other product candidates. Our current arrangements impose various development, financial and other obligations on us. If we materially breach these obligations, or if third parties fail to adequately perform their respective obligations, these exclusive arrangements could be terminated, which could result in our inability to develop, manufacture, market and sell products that are covered by such IP.

Our failure to successfully develop and market our product candidates would impair our ability to grow.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to develop and market additional product candidates. We may spend substantial resources and several years completing the development of a particular current or future internal product candidate, during which process we can experience failure at any stage, and for many reasons. The product candidates to which we allocate our resources, even if approved, may not be commercially successful. In addition, because our internal research capabilities are limited, we may be dependent upon pharmaceutical companies, academic scientists and other researchers to sell or license products or technologies to us. The success of this strategy depends partly upon our ability to identify, select, discover and acquire promising pharmaceutical product candidates and approved products, and to manage our spending as expenses related to undertaking clinical trials can be substantial.
We may be unable to acquire product candidates or products.
The process of proposing, negotiating and implementing a license, or acquiring a product candidate or an approved product, is lengthy and complex. Other companies, including some with substantially greater financial, marketing and sales resources, may compete with us for the license, the product candidate, or approved product. We have limited resources, including financial resources, to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third-party products, businesses and technologies, and to integrate them into our current infrastructure. Moreover, we may devote significant resources to potential acquisitions or to in-licensing opportunities wherein those transactions are never consummated, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts. We may not be able to acquire the rights to additional product candidates on terms that we find acceptable, or at all.
In addition, future acquisitions may entail numerous operational and financial risks, including:
Exposure to unknown liabilities;
Disruption of our business, and diversion of our management's time and attention, to develop acquired products or technologies;
Incur substantial debt, or dilutive issuances of securities, or depletion of cash to pay for acquisitions;
Incur higher than expected acquisition, integration, and operating costs;
Experience difficulty in combining the operations and personnel of any acquired businesses with our operations and personnel;
Impair relationships with key suppliers or customers of any acquired businesses, due to changes in management and ownership; and
Unable to retain and/or motivate key employees of any acquired businesses.
We rely on and will continue to rely on outsourcing arrangements for certain of our critical activities, including clinical research of our product candidates, manufacture of our compounds and product candidates beyond Phase II clinical trials, and the manufacture of our commercial products.
We rely on outsourcing arrangements for some of our critical activities, including manufacturing, preclinical and clinical research, data collection and analysis, and electronic submission of regulatory filings. We may have limited control over third parties, and we cannot guarantee that they will perform their obligations in an effective, competent and timely manner. Our reliance on third parties, including third-party Clinical Research Organizations (CROs) and CMOs, entails risks including, but not limited to:
Non-compliance by third parties with regulatory and quality control standards;
Sanctions imposed by regulatory authorities if compounds supplied or manufactured by a third party supplier or manufacturer fail to comply with applicable regulatory standards;
Possible breach of the agreements by the CROs or CMOs because of factors beyond our control, insolvency or other financial difficulties of any of these third parties; labor unrest; natural disasters; or other factors adversely affecting their ability to conduct their business; and
Termination or non-renewal of an agreement by a third party, at a time that is inconvenient for us, and for reasons not entirely under our control.

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of any of our products or product candidates beyond Phase II clinical trials, nor do we have plans in the foreseeable future to develop our own manufacturing operations to support Phase III clinical trials or support commercial production. We currently depend on third-party CMOs for all of our required raw materials and drug substances for our preclinical research and clinical trials. For Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, we currently rely on single source suppliers for raw materials, including API, and rely on third-party manufacturers for the production and packaging of final commercial products. If any of these vendors are unable to perform their obligations to us, including due to violations of the FDA's requirements, our ability to meet regulatory requirements, projected timelines, and necessary quality standards for the development or commercialization of products would be adversely affected. Further, if we were required to change vendors, it could result in substantial delays in our regulatory approval efforts, significantly increase our costs, and delay generation of revenues. Accordingly, the loss of any of our current or future third-party manufacturers or suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and business prospects.
Our clinical trials for our product candidates may fail to demonstrate acceptable levels of safety, efficacy or other requirements, which could prevent or significantly delay regulatory approval.
We may be unable to sufficiently demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in obtaining regulatory approval. We must demonstrate, with substantial evidence gathered in well-controlled studies and to the satisfaction of the relevant regulatory authorities, that each product candidate is safe and effective for use in the target indication. We may be required to conduct additional studies or trials to adequately demonstrate safety and efficacy, which could prevent or significantly delay our receipt of regulatory approval, increase clinical costs, and ultimately delay or otherwise impair the commercialization of that product candidate.
Any product candidate that we in-license or acquire may require additional development prior to commercial sale, including formulation development, extensive clinical testing, and approval by the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to risks of failure typical to pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory authorities.
In addition, the results from the trials that we have completed for our product candidates may not be replicated in future trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced development, even after promising results in earlier trials. If our product candidates are not shown to be safe and effective, these clinical development programs might be terminated.
Delays or failures in the completion of clinical development of our product candidates would increase our costs, delay, or limit our ability to generate revenues.
Delays or failures in the completion of clinical trials for our product candidates could significantly raise our product development costs. We do not know whether current or planned trials will be completed on schedule, if at all. The commencement and completion of clinical development can be delayed or halted for a number of reasons, including:
Difficulties in obtaining regulatory approval to commence a clinical trial, or in complying with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope or term of a clinical trial;
Difficulties obtaining Investigational Research Board (IRB) or ethics committee approval to conduct a trial at a prospective site;
Delays in reaching or failure to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and investigators, the contractual terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly from site to site;
Insufficient or inadequate supply of or quantity of a product candidate for use in trials;
Challenges recruiting and enrolling patients to participate in clinical trials, for any and all reasons, including competition from other programs for the treatment of similar conditions;
Severe or unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by patients in a clinical trial;
Difficulty retaining patients who have enrolled in a clinical trial, but who may be prone to withdraw due to side effects from the therapy, lack of efficacy, or personal issues;
Temporary cessation of clinical trials (clinical holds); or
Delays due to ambiguous or negative interim results in clinical trials.

Clinical trials may be suspended or terminated by us; or at a trial site by the site's Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) or ethics committee overseeing the clinical trial; or by the FDA; or by other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including:
Failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or the trial protocols;
Observations during inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial sites by the FDA or other regulatory authorities which ultimately result in the imposition of a delay or clinical hold;
Unforeseen safety issues; or
Lack of adequate funding to continue the trial.
Failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or the trial protocols may result in the inability to use the trial data to support product approval. Changes in regulatory requirements and guidance may occur, and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmit our clinical trial protocols to IRBs or ethics committees for reexamination, which may adversely impact the cost, timing and/or successful completion of a clinical trial.
In addition, many of the factors that cause or lead to a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we experience delays in completion, or if we terminate any of our clinical trials, our ability to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates may be materially harmed, and our commercial prospects and ability to generate product revenues diminished.
Our products and product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other characteristics that limit their commercial potential, delay, or prevent their regulatory approval.
Undesirable side effects caused by any of our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt development. This could result in the denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, and result in potential product liability claims. Undesirable side effects caused by any of our products could cause regulatory authorities to temporarily or permanently halt product sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Immediate release oxcarbazepine and topiramate products, which use the same APIs (Active Product Ingredient) as Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, are known to cause various organizations can reduceside effects, including but not limited to dizziness, paresthesia, headaches, cognitive deficiencies such as memory loss and speech impediment, digestive problems, somnolence, double vision, gingival enlargement, nausea, weight gain, oral malformation birth defects, visual field defects, infants small for gestational age, and fatigue. The use of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR may cause similar side effects as compared to their reference products, or may cause additional or different side effects.
Products that were or are currently on the market and use the same API as our product candidates, including SPN-812, SPN-810 (drug products), SPN-817 (dietary supplements), and SPN-604, were known to cause various side effects, including but not limited to drowsiness, depression, hyperactivity, euphoria, extrapyramidal reactions, nausea, headache, diarrhea, vomiting, sleep difficulties, agitation, exacerbation of anxiety, sleepiness, mouth dryness, tachycardia, constipation and urinary difficulties. The labels for those products also included precautions and warnings about; among other things; tardive dyskinesia; neuroleptic malignant syndrome; elevation of prolactin levels; convulsive events in patients that are treated for or have a prior history of epilepsy; inhibition of hepatic metabolism of certain drugs; risk of suicide before antidepressant clinical improvement; need for monitoring patients with cardiac, hepatic or renal insufficiency; or patients at risk for angle-closure glaucoma. The use of SPN-812, SPN-810, SPN-817 and SPN-604 may cause similar side effects as compared to these reference products, or may cause additional or different side effects.
If our products cause side effects, or if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by our products or product candidates, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:
Regulatory authorities may withdraw approval of the product candidate or otherwise require us to take the approved product off the market;
Regulatory authorities may require additional warnings, or a narrowing of the indication on the product label;
We may be required to create a medication guide outlining the proper use of the medication and the risks of side effects, for distribution to patients;
We may be required to modify the product in some way;
Regulatory authorities may require us to conduct additional clinical trials, or costly post-marketing testing and surveillance, to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product;

Sales of approved products may decrease significantly;
We could be sued and be held liable for harm caused to patients; or
Our reputation may suffer.
Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining the commercial success of our products and product candidates.

Government agencies promulgate regulationscandidates, and guidelines directly applicablecould substantially increase commercialization costs.

We may not obtain or maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including market exclusivity.
Regulatory authorities in the United States may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. The FDA may grant orphan drug designation to usdrugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the U.S. Orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives, such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax credits for certain research, and to our products and product candidates.user fee waivers under certain circumstances. In addition, professional societies, practice management groups, private health and science foundations and organizations involvedif a drug receives its first FDA approval in various diseases from time to time may also publish guidelines or recommendations to the health care and patient communities. Recommendations of government agencies or these other groups or organizations may relate to such matters as usage, dosage, route of administration and use of concomitant therapies. Recommendations or guidelines suggesting the reduced use of our products or the use of competitive or alternative products that are followed by patients and health care providers could result in decreased use of our products.

We face potential product liability exposure, and if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities.

The use of our product candidate in clinical trials and the sale of any of our products expose us to the risk of product liability claims. Product liability claims might be brought against us by consumers, healthcare providers or others selling or otherwise coming into contact with our products and product candidates. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we could incur substantial liabilities. In addition, product liability claims may result in:


Tableit has orphan drug designation, that drug is entitled to seven years of Contents

Our product liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials is limited to $15 million per claim and $15 million inmarket exclusivity. This implies that the aggregate, and covers bodily injury and property damage arising from our clinical trials, subject to industry-standard terms, conditions and exclusions. Our insurance coverageFDA may not be sufficientapprove any other firm's application for the same drug for that same indication for a period of seven years. Exceptions are limited, such as showing clinical superiority over the drug with orphan drug exclusivity.

Although we have been granted FDA orphan drug designation for SPN-817 for the treatment of Dravet Syndrome, and we intend to reimburse usexpand our designation for all expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and, in the future,alternative uses where applicable, we may not be ablereceive the benefits associated with orphan drug designation. This may result from a failure to maintain insurance coverage atorphan drug status, or it may result from a reasonable costcompeting product reaching the market with an orphan designation for the same disease indication. Under U.S. rules for orphan drugs, if such a competing product reaches the market before ours does, the competing product could potentially obtain a scope of market exclusivity that limits or precludes our product from being sold in sufficient amountsthe U.S. for seven years. Even if we obtain exclusivity, the FDA could subsequently approve an alternative drug for the same condition, if the FDA concludes that the second to protect us against losses. On occasion, large judgments have been awardedreach the market is clinically superior in class action lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. A successfulit is safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. In addition, a competitor may receive approval of different products for the same indication for which our orphan product liability claimhas exclusivity, or seriesmay obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity.
In August 2017, the FDA Reauthorization Act of claims brought against us could cause our stock price2017 (FDARA) was enacted. FDARA, among other things, codified the FDA's pre-existing regulatory interpretation to decline. If judgments exceed our insurance coverage, our cash balance could decreaserequire that a drug sponsor demonstrate clinical superiority of an orphan drug that is otherwise the same as a previously approved drug for the same rare disease in order to receive orphan drug exclusivity. The new legislation reverses prior precedent holding that the Orphan Drug Act unambiguously requires that the FDA recognize the orphan exclusivity period, regardless of showing clinical superiority.
The FDA may further reevaluate the Orphan Drug Act, including the FDARA amendment, its regulations and adverselypolicies. We do not know if, when, or how the FDA may change the orphan drug regulations and policies in the future. It is uncertain how any changes might affect our business.

Depending on what changes the FDA may make to its orphan drug regulations and policies, our business could be adversely impacted.

Healthcare reform measures could hinder or prevent the commercial success of our products or product candidates.

The U.S. government (federal, certain states, and certain states) and other non-U.S.foreign governments have shown significant, and increased interest in pursuing healthcare reform.reform and changes to the healthcare delivery system. Government-adopted reform measures could adversely impact the pricing of healthcare products and services in the U.S. or internationally, and adversely impactimpacting the amountlevel of reimbursement available from governmental agencies and/or commercial third-party payors. The continuing efforts of thethird-party payors, including U.S. federal and state agencies, foreign governments, insurance companies, managed care organizations, employers, and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce health carehealthcare costs may adversely affect our ability to set prices for any approved productat launch or to increase priceprices once launched. These initiatives could adversely impact our ability to generate revenues, andto achieve profitability, or to and maintain profitability.

In both the U. S. (federal and certain states) and some foreign jurisdictions, there There have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals and initiatives to change the health carehealthcare system in ways that could adversely affect our ability to profitably sell any approved product profitably.product. Some of these proposed and implemented reforms couldwould result in reduced reimbursement rates for our products, which would adversely affect our business strategy, operations and financial results. For example, in

In March 2010, then President Obama signed into law a comprehensive change to the U.S. healthcare system, known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the HealthCareHealth Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. These laws and their regulations, which we refer to collectively as the HealthCare Reform Law, may have far reaching consequences for biopharmaceuticalpharmaceutical companies like us. As a resultPossible revisions to the HealthCare Reform Law are the subject of ongoing legislative debates and litigation.

The HealthCare Reform Law has continued to exert downward pressure on pharmaceutical pricing, especially under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and has increased the industry's regulatory burden and operating costs. Among the provisions of the HealthCare Reform Law substantial changes could be madeof importance to the current system for paying for healthcare in the U.S., including changes made in order to extend benefits to those who currently lack insurance coverage or to change coverage parameters. Extending coverage to a large population could substantially change the structure of the health insurance system and the methodology for reimbursing medical services and drugs. These structural changes could entail modifications to the existing system of private payors and government programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, create of a new government-sponsored healthcare insurance source, or some combination of both, as well as other changes. Restructuring the healthcare delivery system in the U.S., could impact the reimbursement for prescribed drugs, including our products and product candidates. If reimbursement for our approvedcandidates are the following:
An annual, nondeductible fee payable to the U.S. federal government, by any entity that manufactures or imports specified branded prescription drugs or biologic agents. This fee is based on each company's market share of prior year total sales of branded products is substantially less than we expectto certain federal healthcare programs;
An increase in the future,statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program;
Rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected;
A Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer a substantial point-of-sale discount off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer's outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;
Extension of manufacturers' Medicaid rebate obligations associatedliability to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations;
Expansion of the eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs in certain states;
Expansion of the entities eligible for discounts under the Public Health Service pharmaceutical pricing program;
A requirement to annually report the amount of drug samples that manufacturers and distributors provide to physicians; and
A Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities for, and to conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with themfunding for such research.
Other legislative changes have been adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. These changes include aggregate reductions in Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in April 2013. Due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, it will remain in effect through 2025 unless additional Congressional action is taken.
The FDA statutes, regulations and guidance are substantially increased,often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether additional legislative changes will be enacted or whether FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. Future regulatory changes could be materiallymake it more difficult for us to maintain or attain approval to develop and adversely impacted.

In 2007, the Foodcommercialize our products and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 was enacted, giving thetechnologies.

The FDA has enhanced its post-marketing authority, including the authority to require post-marketing studies and clinical trials, labeling changes based on new safety information, andor to require compliance with risk evaluationsevaluation and mitigation strategies approved bystrategies. Further, the FDA. In 2012 the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act was enacted, expandingexpanded drug supply chain reporting requirements and strengtheningstrengthened the FDA's response to drug shortages, as well as other changes.shortages. The FDA's exercise of thisits authority could result in delays, or increasedcould increase costs during product development, clinical trials and regulatory review,review. It could also result in increased


Table of Contents

costs to assure compliance with post-approval regulatory requirements, and could result in potential restrictions on the sale and/or distribution of any approved product.

Since its enactment, there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act. The Trump Administration and U.S. Congress have attempted, and will likely continue to seek to modify, repeal, or otherwise invalidate all, or certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act. Since January 2017, President Trump has signed two Executive Orders as well as other directives designed to delay, circumvent or loosen the implementation of certain provisions mandated by the Affordable Care Act that would otherwise impose a fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals. Concurrently, Congress has considered legislation that would repeal or replace all or part of the Affordable Care Act. While Congress has not passed repeal legislation, on December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act), which included a provision that repealed the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the Affordable Care Act on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year. This is commonly referred to as the "individual mandate." Additionally, in January 2018, President Trump signed a continuing resolution on appropriations for fiscal year 2018 that delayed the implementation of certain Affordable Care Act-mandated fees, including: the so-called "Cadillac" tax on certain high cost employer-sponsored insurance plans; the annual fee imposed on certain health insurance providers based on market share; and the medical device excise tax on non-exempt medical devices. In addition, in December 2018, a Texas Federal District Court struck down the entire Affordable Care Act as unconstitutional, holding that following the elimination of the tax penalty under the Affordable Care Act, the remaining individual mandate portion of the Affordable Care Act could not be justified as a proper and legitimate use of Congress' taxing power. Because the Court deemed the individual mandate as inseverable from the rest of the Affordable Care Act, the entire Affordable

Care Act was rendered unconstitutional. This case will be appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and could ultimately end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Congress may consider other legislation to repeal or replace elements of the Affordable Care Act. It is difficult to predict the extent to which any of these changes to the Affordable Care Act, or additional changes, if made, may impact our business or any financial condition.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three years to five years. In 2019, the Trump Administration put forth a proposal to eliminate certain rebates pharmaceutical companies pay insurance companies under Medicare. The proposal would allow pharmaceutical companies and pharmacy benefit managers to negotiate rebates as long as the savings are passed directly to consumers at the pharmacy. More recently, there have been several Congressional inquiries and proposed bills designed to, among other things, bring: more transparency to drug pricing; reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare; review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs; and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs.
Several of the Democratic presidential candidates running in the 2020 election are proposing a single-payer national health insurance system, often dubbed "Medicare for All". "Medicare for All" would likely establish a single public or quasi-public agency that organizes healthcare financing, but healthcare delivery would remain private. While expanding Medicare would increase the demand for prescription drugs, there is a likelihood that Medicare will be required to negotiate drug prices with manufactures, which could adversely affect our future prospects.
Certain U.S. states have become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, and restrictions on access to certain products. Marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures have been designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products, and which suppliers, will be included in their prescription drug formularies. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors, or other similar restrictions, could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Alternatively, these could prevent us from being able to commercialize our products, or to generate an acceptable return on our investment.
The availability of generic products may also substantially increase pricing pressures on, and reduce reimbursement for our future products. We expect to experience continued pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any of our products, due to the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations, their increasing leverage in pricing negotiations, and additional legislative changes.
The Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA) became law in 2013. The DQSA creates the requirement for companies to trace, verify and identify all products across all changes of ownershipthrough the entire supply chain, from manufacturer to dispenser.

In 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act) was signed into law. The Cures Act was designed to modernize and personalize healthcare, spur innovation and research, and streamline the discovery and development of new therapies through increased federal funding of particular programs. It authorized increased funding for the FDA to spend on innovation projects. The law also amended the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) to reauthorize and expand funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Cures Act established the NIH Innovation Fund, to pay for the cost of development and implementation of a strategic plan, early stage investigations and research. It also charged the NIH with leading and coordinating expanded pediatric research. Further, the Cures Act directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to expand surveillance of neurological diseases.
In August 2017, President Trump signed FDARA into law. FDARA reauthorized the various user fees to facilitate the FDA's review and oversight relating to prescription drugs, generic drugs, medical devices and biosimilars. The legislation also included several policy riders that will impact an array of issues within the FDA's authority, including, among others, pediatric study requirements, orphan drug exclusivity, and the approval process for generic drugs. With amendments to the FDCA and the PHSA, Title III of the Cures Act sought to accelerate the discovery, development, and delivery of new medicines and medical technologies. To that end, and among other provisions, the Cures Act reauthorized the existing priority review voucher program through 2020, for certain drugs intended to treat rare pediatric diseases; created a new priority review voucher program for drug applications, which are determined to be material national security threat medical countermeasure applications; revised the FDCA to streamline review of combination product applications; required the FDA to evaluate the potential use of "real world evidence" to help support approval of new indications for approved drugs; provided a new "limited population" approval pathway for antibiotic and antifungal drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening infections; and authorized the FDA to designate a drug as a "regenerative advanced therapy," thereby making it eligible for certain expedited review and approval designations.

On September 19, 2019, the U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled a plan to lower the cost of prescription drugs by allowing the federal government to negotiate prices annually for the most expensive drugs on the market. On December 6, 2019, House Republican leaders released a bipartisan alternative to Speaker Pelosi’s plan. On December 12, 2019, the House passed H.R.3. known as the Lower Drug Costs Now Act and sent it to the Senate for consideration. Any prescription drug pricing legislation that is ultimately adopted may affect the success of our products, product candidates, and profitability.
Future federalhealthcare reforms in the U.S. and state proposals and health care reforms in other countries could limit the prices that can be charged for our productproducts and product candidates, that we develop andor may furtherotherwise limit our commercial opportunities. Our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by the HealthCare Reform Law by reducing the amounts that private insurers will pay and by other health care reforms that may be enacted or adopted in the future.

Implementation of the HealthCare Reform Lawany change in healthcare laws could cause us to incur significant compliance expenses or could subject us to substantial penalties and fines if our business is found to violate these requirements.

The HealthCare Reform Law is multi-faceted and is being implemented in phases. Theassessment of the financial impact of the HealthCare Reform Law on our business is on-going, and thereon-going. There can be no assurance that our business will not be materially harmed by future implementation of or changes to the HealthCare Reform Law. In addition, ifIf we are not in full compliance with the HealthCare Reform Law, we could face enforcement action, fines and other penalties and wepenalties. We could receive adverse publicity.

The HealthCare Reform Law includes various provisions designed to strengthen fraud and abuse enforcement, such as increasedenforcement. These include increasing funding for enforcement efforts, and lowering the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback statute and criminal health carehealthcare fraud statute, such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge or specific intent to violatesviolate the statute.

If our past or present operations are found to be in violation of any such laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, includingboth civil and criminal, penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from federal health carehealthcare programs and/or the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

The risk of our being found in violation of the HealthCare Reform Law, its underlying regulations, or other laws impacted by its implementation is made more complex by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and theircourts. Their provisions are subject to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against them,these assertions, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses, and divert our management's attention from the operation of our business.

If we fail to comply with healthcare regulations, we could face substantial penalties and ourpenalties. Our business, operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

As a supplier of pharmaceuticals, certain U.S. federal and state health carehealthcare laws and regulations pertaining to patients' rights to privacy, fraud and abuse protection, are and will be applicable to our business. We could be subject to allegations of healthcare fraud and abuse, and patient privacy regulationviolations by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The regulationsRegulations include the:

Federal healthcare program anti-kickback law,Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce either the referral of an individual for an item or service, or the purchasing or ordering of a good or service, for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

programs. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge or specific intent to violate the statute in order to have committed a violation. Further, the government may assert that a claim, including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act, as discussed below. On October 19, 2019, additional Anti-Kickback regulations were proposed which, if adopted, would create new and change existing safe harbors. Safe harbors protect certain arrangements from prosecution, if each of the elements of the safe harbor is satisfied;
Federal Falsecivil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, which prohibit, among other things,things: individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent, and whichfraudulent; knowingly making a false statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. This may apply to entities like us, which provide coding and billing advice to customers;

Table of Contents

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations could be costly. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above, or in violation of any governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, curtailment or restructuring of our operations could adversely affect our ability to operate our business, and could impair our financial results.
Although compliance programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws, the risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management's attention from the operation of our business. Moreover, achieving and sustaining compliance with applicable federal and state privacy, security and fraud laws may prove costly.

Guidelines and recommendations published by various organizations can reduce the use of our products and product candidates.
Government agencies promulgate regulations and guidelines directly applicable to us and to our products and product candidates, wherein those regulations or guidelines could affect the use of our products. In addition, professional societies, practice management groups, private health and science foundations, and organizations involved in various diseases from time to time may also publish guidelines or recommendations to the health care provider and patient communities. Recommendations from government agencies or these other groups or organizations may relate to such matters as usage, dosage, route of administration and use of concomitant therapies. Recommendations or guidelines suggesting the reduced use of our products, or the use of competitive or alternative products which are subsequently followed by patients and health care providers, could result in decreased use of our products.
We could be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time consuming, distracting, and ultimately unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe our patents. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming. For example, we were involved in several matters related to Paragraph IV Certification Notice Letters that we received in connection with our products and our collaborators' products. In connection with an ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application), a Paragraph IV Certification Notice Letter notifies the FDA that one or more patents listed in the FDA's Orange Book is alleged to be invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the competitive ANDA product.
In any infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or enforceable, or the court may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue, on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, or interpreted narrowly, and could put our patent application at risk of not issuing.

Interference proceedings brought by the USPTO (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents and patent applications, or the patents of our collaborators. An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the technology, or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if a prevailing party does not offer us a license on terms that are acceptable to us, or offer terms at all. Litigation or interference proceedings may fail. Even if successful, litigation may result in substantial costs, and distract our management and other employees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our collaborators, misappropriation of our proprietary rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as they are protected in the U.S.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation.
In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceeding or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, or perceive that the presence or continuation of these cases creates a level of uncertainty regarding our ability to increase or sustain products sales, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
There can be no assurance that our product candidates will not be subject to the same risks.
Limitations on our patent rights relating to our products and product candidates may limit our ability to prevent third parties from competing against us.
To a significant degree, our success will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for: our proprietary technologies; for both our products and product candidates; to preserve our trade secrets; to prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights; and to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. To that end, we seek patent protection in the U.S. and internationally for our products and product candidates. Our policy is to actively seek to protect our proprietary positions by, among other things, filing patent applications in the U.S. and abroad (including Europe, Canada and certain other countries when appropriate) relating to proprietary technologies that are important to the development of our business.
The strength of patents in the pharmaceutical industry involves complex legal and scientific questions, and can have uncertain results. Patent applications in the U.S. and most other countries are confidential for a period of time until they are published. Publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature typically lags actual discoveries by several months, or more. As a result, we cannot be certain that we were the first to conceive inventions covered by our patents and pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. In addition, we cannot be certain that our patent applications will be granted; that any issued patents will adequately protect our intellectual property; or that such patents will not be challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented.
We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position, which we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, with our collaborators, and with our consultants. We also have agreements with our employees and selected consultants that obligate them to assign their inventions to us.
It is possible that technology relevant to our business will be independently developed by a person that is not a party to such an agreement. Furthermore, if the employees and consultants that are parties to these agreements breach or violate the terms of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies. We could lose our trade secrets through such breaches or violations. Further, our trade secrets could otherwise become known or could be independently discovered by our competitors. Any failure to adequately prevent disclosure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information could have a material, adverse impact on our business.
In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent, or in the same manner as the U.S.. Therefore, we may encounter problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property in certain foreign jurisdictions.
If we are sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, it could be costly and time consuming to defend such a suit. An unfavorable outcome in such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our commercial success depends upon our ability, and the ability of our collaborators, to develop, manufacture, market and sell our approved products and our product candidates, and to use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we and our collaborators are developing product candidates. As the pharmaceutical industry expands and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our collaborators' approved products, or our product candidates, may give rise to claims of infringement of the patent rights of others. There may be issued patents of third parties that we are currently unaware of, and that may be infringed by our collaborators' approved products, or Oxtellar XR, or Trokendi XR. These patents could prevent us from being able to maximize revenue generated by our products, or our product candidates. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be pending patent applications which may later result in issued patents. Our collaborators' approved products, our products, or our product candidates may infringe those issued patents.

We may be exposed to, or threatened with, future litigation by third parties alleging that our collaborators' approved products, our products, or product candidates infringe their intellectual property rights. If one of our collaborators' approved products, our products, or our product candidates is found to infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party, we or our collaborators could be enjoined by a court and required to pay damages. In such an event, we could be prevented from commercializing the applicable approved products or product candidates, unless we obtain a license to the patent. A license may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, during litigation, the patent holder could obtain a preliminary injunction, or other equitable relief, which could prohibit us from making, using or selling our approved products prior to a trial. Such a trial may not occur for several years.
There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry. If a third party claims that we or our collaborators infringe its intellectual property rights, we may face a number of issues, including, but not limited to:
Infringement and other intellectual property claims which, regardless of merit, may be expensive and time-consuming to litigate, and which may divert our management's attention from our core business;
Substantial damages for infringement, which we may have to pay if a court decides that the product at issue infringes on or violates the third party's rights. If the court finds that the infringement was willful, we could be ordered to pay treble damages, and pay the patent owner's legal fees;
Court rulings prohibiting us from selling our products or product candidates, unless the third party licenses its rights to us, which it is not required to do;
If a license is available from a third party, we may have to pay substantial royalties, fees or grant cross-licenses to our intellectual property rights; and
Redesigning our products or product candidates, so they do not infringe. This may not be possible or may require substantial monetary expenditures and time.
Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies. Our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions during the patent process. There are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or in lapse of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case, causing damage to our business.
We face potential litigation and product liability exposures. If successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities.
In recent years, the volume of claims and the amount of damages claimed in litigation against the pharmaceutical industry has increased. While we strive to conduct our business in accordance with the highest standards, we nevertheless remain exposed to litigation risk. We could be sued by many different parties, including, for example, consumers, healthcare providers, or others selling or otherwise coming into contact with our products and product candidates. Lawsuits or investigations that we may become involved in could be very expensive. These claims may be highly damaging to our reputation, even if the underlying claims are without merit, thereby adversely affecting our business.
The use of our product candidates in clinical trials, and the commercial sale of any of our products expose us to the risk of product liability claims. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we could incur substantial liabilities. In addition, product liability claims may result in:
Decreased demand for a commercial product;
Impairment of our business reputation and exposure to adverse publicity;
Withdrawal of bioequivalence and/or clinical trial participants;
Initiation of investigations by regulators;
Costs related to litigation;
Distraction of management's attention from our primary business;
Substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;
Loss of revenues; and

Our inability to commercialize products for which we are obtaining marketing approval.
Our product liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials is limited to $15 million per claim, and $15 million in the aggregate. Insurance covers bodily injury and property damage arising from our clinical trials, subject to industry-standard terms, conditions and exclusions. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits for drugs that had unanticipated side effects. In the future, potential inability to obtain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost, or at all, to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent, or inhibit, the development and commercialization of the pharmaceutical products we develop.
Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover our legal claims, or other losses that we may incur in the future.
We seek to minimize any losses we may incur through various insurance contracts from third-party insurance carriers. However, our insurance coverage is subject to large individual claim deductibles, individual claim and aggregate policy limits, and other terms and conditions. We cannot assure that our insurance will be sufficient to cover our losses. Further, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, we cannot provide assurance that insurance coverage will continue to be available on terms similar to those presently available to us, or available at all. Any such losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.
We employ individuals who were previously employed at other pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. As such, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed trade secrets, or disclosed other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs, and be a distraction to management.
As we continue to increase the size of our organization, we may experience difficulties in managing growth.

Our personnel, systems and facilities currently in place may not be adequate to support future growth. Our future financial performance and our ability to compete effectively will depend, in part,significant degree, on our ability to effectively manage our recent and any future growth. In 2016,2019, we increased employee headcount from 344448 employees to 363 employees and increased revenues464 employees. Revenues in 2019 were $392.8 million, compared to $215.0 million from $147.5$408.9 million in 2015.2018. Our need to effectively execute our growth strategy requires that we:

Manage our regulatory approvals and clinical trials effectively;

Manage our internal development efforts effectively and in a cost effective manner, while complying with our contractual obligations to licensors, licensees, contractors, collaborators and other third parties;

Commercialize our product candidates;

Improve our operational, financial and management controls, financial reporting systems and procedures; and

Attract, retain and motivate sufficient numbers of talented employees.

employees, with the requisite skills and experience.

This growth could place a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure, and may require our management to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day activities. We may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations, or to recruit and train additional qualified personnel, whichpersonnel. This may result in weaknesses in our infrastructure,infrastructure; give rise to operational mistakes,mistakes; loss of business opportunities,opportunities; loss of employeesemployees; and reduced productivity.
We


Table of Contents

may not be able to make improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner, and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls. In addition, our growth will cause us to comply with an increasing number of regulations and statutory requirements. If our management is unable to effectively manage our expected growth, our expenses may increase more than expected,expected; our ability to generate or increase our revenues could be impaired,impaired; and we may not be able to implement our business strategy.


We face significant competition in attracting and retaining talented employees. Further, managing succession for, and retention of key executives is critical to our success. Our failure to do so could have an adverse impact on our future performance.
We are highly dependent upon skilled personnel in key parts of our organization, and we invest heavily in recruiting, training and retaining qualified individuals, which includes significant efforts to enhance the diversity of our workforce. The loss of the service of key members of our organization, including senior members of our scientific and management teams, high-quality researchers, development specialists, and skilled personnel, could delay or prevent the achievement of major business objectives. Our future growth will demand talented employees and leaders, yet the market for such talent has become increasingly competitive. In addition, our ability to hire qualified personnel also depends on our flexibility to reward superior performance, and to pay competitive compensation.
We may not be able to attract or motivate qualified management, scientific and clinical personnel in the future due to the intense competition for qualified personnel among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and other businesses. Our industry has experienced a high rate of turnover of management personnel in recent years. If we are not able to attract and motivate key personnel to accomplish our business objectives, we may experience constraints that may significantly impede the achievement of our objectives.
Effective succession planning is also important to our long-term success. Failure to ensure effective transfer of knowledge and smooth transition involving key employees and members of our management team could hinder our strategic planning and business execution. In addition, our failure to adequately plan for succession of senior management and for other key management roles, or the failure of key employees to successfully transition into new roles, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are highly dependent on the development, regulatory, commercial and financial expertise of our management, particularly Jack A. Khattar, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Khattar has an employment agreement. Other members of the senior management team have executive retention agreements, but these agreements do not guarantee the services of these executives will continue to be available to us. If we lose key members of our management team, we may not be able to find suitable replacements in a timely fashion, if at all. We cannot be certain that future management transitions will not disrupt our operations, or will not generate concern among employees and those with whom we do business.
In addition to competition for personnel, our corporate offices are located in the greater Washington D.C. metropolitan area, an area that is characterized by a high cost of living. As such, we could have difficulty attracting experienced personnel to our Company and may be required to expend significant financial resources in our employee recruitment efforts. As a result, despite significant efforts on our part, we may be unable to attract and retain qualified individuals in sufficient numbers, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may enter into significant, complex and unusual transactions, which may require us to engage outside consultants and financial professionals in order to comply with complex accounting and reporting requirements.

From time to time, the Company may be presented with, and may choose to enter into, significant, complex and unusual business or financial transactions, either to raise capital or in the context of entering into a business arrangement with a third party. These transactions may entail complex accounting or financial reporting requirements, with which we may not be familiar. Accordingly, we may need to hire additional personnel, or retain the services of outside accounting, financial reporting, and legal experts, to guide both the transaction and to assist management in becoming compliant with the attendant financial reporting requirements. Moreover, acquiringAcquiring such additional resources could increase our legal and financial compliance costs, divert managementmanagement's attention from other matters, and/or make somecertain activities more time consuming.

Given the complexity of such transactions, there is inherent risk regarding compliance with financial reporting requirements. Because the relevant regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretation, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, their application in practice may evolve over time, as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies.bodies, and as the market gains familiarity with these requirements. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters, and on-going financial reporting requirements.
If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and accounting standards differ from the intentions of regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and our business may be adversely affected.

Our operations rely on sophisticated information technology, systems and infrastructure, a disruption of which could harm our operations.
We may not be able to make improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner, and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls. In addition, we rely on various information technology, and systems, some of which are dependent on services provided by third parties, to manage our technology platform and operations.

These systems provide critical data and services for internal and external users, including procurement, inventory management, transaction processing, financial, commercial and operational data, human resources management, legal and tax compliance, financial reporting and other information necessary to operate and manage our business. These systems are complex, and are frequently updated as technology improves. This includes software and hardware that is licensed, leased or purchased from third parties. If our information technology, equipment or systems fail to function properly due to internal errors or defects, implementation or integration issues, catastrophic events or power outages, we may experience a material disruption in our ability to manage our business operations. Failure or disruption of these systems could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may not be able to make improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner, and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls. Any failure to manage, expand, or update our information technology infrastructure, or any failure in the operation of this infrastructure, could harm our business.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we or our vendors collect and store sensitive data in our or their data centers and on our networks, including: intellectual property; proprietary business information; proprietary information of our customers, suppliers and business partners; and personally identifiable information of our employees and patients in our clinical trials. In addition, hardware, software, or applications we procure from third parties, or through open source solutions, may contain defects in design or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. The continued occurrence of high-profile data breaches provides evidence of an external environment which is increasingly hostile to information security, and to the secure processing, maintenance and transmission of information critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers, or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Despite our efforts to improve our information security controls, it is possible that the security controls we have implemented to safeguard personal data and our networks, train our employees and vendors on data security, and implement security requirements and other practices, we may not prevent the compromise of our networks or the improper disclosure of data that we or our vendors store and manage. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties with whom we do business, through fraud, trickery, or other forms of deceiving our employees, contractors, and vendors. If we, our vendors, or other third parties with whom we do business experience significant data security breaches, or fail to detect and appropriately respond to significant data security breaches, we could be exposed to government enforcement actions. Improper disclosure could also harm our reputation, create risks for customers, or subject us to liability under laws that protect personal information. This could adversely affect our business, revenues and competitive position.
We recently completed a move to our new headquarters and we may face disruption and additional costs as we complete the move-in process.
We have entered into a lease to relocate our corporate headquarters in 2019. In connection with the relocation, we incurred additional expenses, including those related to moving and costs to leave our existing facilities, tenant improvements and associated expenses not covered by the landlord, as well as furniture and equipment purchases for the new corporate headquarters. As we complete the move-in process, the relocation could result in additional business disruption, and could have a negative impact on our operating results. In addition, we may incur charges related to exiting our current lease if we are not able to exit or release on favorable terms.
Our business involves the use of hazardous materials, and we must comply with environmental laws and regulations, whichregulations. This can be expensive and restrict how we do business.

Our activities and the activities conducted by our third-party manufacturers'manufacturers and suppliers' activitiessuppliers involve the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials owned by us.materials. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are subject to federal, state, city and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. Although we believe that the safety procedures we use for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards prescribed by theseapplicable laws and regulations, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of an accident, local, city, state or federal authorities may curtail the use of these materials, and may interrupt our business operations, including our commercialization, and research and development efforts. Although we believe that the safety procedures utilized by our third-party manufacturers for handling and disposing of these materials generally comply with the standards prescribed by theseapplicable laws and regulations, we have no direct control over our third-party manufacturers, and therefore cannot guarantee that this is the case orcase. We can eliminate the risk of accidental contamination, or that such safety procedures will prevent injury from these materials. In such an event, we may be held liable for any resulting damages and suchdamages. Such liability could exceed our resources.

We do not currently maintain biological or hazardous materials insurance coverage.


Table of Contents

Obtaining While we have implemented processes and maintaining our patent protection depends on complianceprocedures to ensure that the suppliers we use are complying with various procedural, document submission, fee paymentall applicable regulations, there can be no assurances that such suppliers in all instances will comply with such processes and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reducedprocedures, or eliminated for non-complianceotherwise comply with these requirements.

The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions during the patent process. There are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case.

We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

We employ individuals who were previously employed at other pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors and, as such, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigationapplicable regulations. Noncompliance could result in substantial costsour marketing and be a distraction to management.

Security breaches and other disruptionsdistribution of contaminated, defective or dangerous products, which could compromise our information and exposesubject us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data in our data centers and on our networks, including: intellectual property; our proprietary business information; proprietary information of our customers, suppliers and business partners; and personally identifiable information of our employees and patients in our clinical trials. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of informationliabilities. This could result in legal claimsthe imposition by governmental authorities of procedures or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties that could disruptrestrict or eliminate our operations and damage our reputation, whichability to sell products. Any or all of these effects could adversely affect our business, revenuesfinancial condition and competitive position.

results of operations.

Provisions in our agreement with Shire, or its successor, impose restrictive covenants on us, which could limit our ability to operate effectively in the future.

In 2005, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Shire Laboratories Inc., the predecessor of Supernus Pharmaceuticals. Under the purchase agreement, we agreed to refrain perpetually from engaging in any research, formulation development, analytical testing, manufacture, technology assessment, or oral bioavailability screening that relate to five specific drug compounds (amphetamine,(i.e., amphetamine, carbamazepine, guanfacine, lanthanum and mesalamine), and any derivative thereof. Although these various restrictions and covenants on us do not currently impact our products, product candidates or business, they could in the future limit or delay our ability to take advantage of business opportunities that may relate to such compounds.


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Finances and Capital Requirements

Although we have been profitable from operations since the fourth quarter of 2014, there is no assurance that we will continue to generate net income in the future.

We may not be able to maintain or increase profitability.

In recent years, we have focused primarily on developing our current products and product candidates, with the goal of commercializing these products and supporting regulatory approval for our product candidates. We have financed our operations through revenue generated from operations and various transactions including the following:

The completion of our $52.3 million initial public offering in May 2012;

The completion of our follow-on $49.9 million equity offering in November 2012;

The completion of our $90.0 million private placement offering of 7.50% Convertible Senior Secured Notes Due 2019 (the(2019 Notes) in May 2013; and

The $30.0 million monetization of certain future royalty streams in 2014, under our existing license for Orenitram.

WeOrenitram; and

The completion of our $402.5 million private placement of 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes (2023 Notes) in March 2018.
Our ability to remain profitable depends upon our ability to generate the same or increasing levels of revenue from sales of our products, Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, while simultaneously funding the requisite research expenditures to gain FDA approval for our product candidates. Since 2013, the first year in which we generated revenue from our first commercial products, we have demonstrated the ability to become and remain profitable. Future revenues will highly depend on our ability to maintain or grow demand for our products and defend against potential generic competition, and successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates.
As of December 31, 2019, we had retained earnings of approximately $199.5 million. However, prior to 2018, we had incurred significant operating losses since inception. Asinception through 2014, substantially as a consequence of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $84.3 million. Substantially all of our operating losses resulted from costs incurred in connection with our development programs, expenses associated with launching our products, and from selling, general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect our research and development costs to continue to be substantial and to increase with respect to our product candidates, as we advance those product candidates through preclinical studies, clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up and other pre-approval activities. We expect our selling, general and administrative costs to continue to increase as we continue to support the ongoing commercialization of our products.

Our prior losses have had an adverse effect onproducts, and to further increase in anticipation of launching our stockholders' equity and cash position. product candidates.

While we anticipate maintaining profitability in 20172020 and beyond, we cannot be certain that we will do so. Any potential future losses, if and when they occur, could have an adverse impact on our stockholders' equity and working capital. Furthermore, since
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly.
We expect that any revenue we generate will fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year, as a result of revenue generated from approved products, our license agreements, the completionamount and timing of development milestones, and product revenue received under our collaboration license agreements.

Our net earnings and other operating results will be affected by numerous factors, including:
The level of market acceptance for any approved product candidate, underlying demand for that product and wholesalers' buying patterns;
Variations in the level of expenses related to our development programs;
The success of our initial public offeringproduct development and clinical trial activities through all phases of clinical development;
Our execution of any collaborative, licensing or similar commercial arrangements, and the timing of payments we may make or receive under these arrangements;
Any delays in May 2012,regulatory review and approval of product candidates in clinical development;
The timing of any regulatory approvals, if received, of additional indications for our existing products;
Potential side effects of our products and our future products that could delay or prevent commercialization, cause an approved drug to be taken off the market, or result in litigation;
Any intellectual property infringement lawsuit in which we have incurred additional costs associated withmay become involved;
Our ability to maintain an effective sales and marketing infrastructure;
Our dependency on third-party manufacturers to supply or manufacture our products and product candidates;
Competition from existing products, new products, or potential generics to our products or to competitive products that may emerge;
Regulatory developments affecting our products and product candidates; and
Changes in reimbursement environment and regulatory changes.
Due to the various factors mentioned above, and others, the results of any prior quarterly period should not be relied upon as an indication of our future operating as a public company.

performance. If our quarterly operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any quarterly fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our stock to fluctuate substantially.

We may need additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs, commercialization or commercializationbusiness development efforts.

Developing or acquiring product candidates, conducting clinical trials, establishing manufacturing relationships and marketing drugs are expensive and uncertain processes.

In addition, unforeseen circumstances may arise, or our strategic imperatives could change, causing us to consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate, requiring us to seek to raise additional funds. We have no committed external sources of funds.

The amount and timing of our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

Our ability to successfully support our products in the marketplace and the rate of increase in the level of sales in the marketplace;

the
The rate of progress, clinical success, and cost of our trials and other product development programs for our product candidates;

the
The costs and timing of in-licensing additional product candidates or acquiring other complementary companies;

the
The timing of any regulatory approvals of our product candidates;

Table of Contents

arrangement.

Additional financing may not be available whenin the amount we need itrequire or may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. We may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, or at all, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our development programs, our commercialization efforts or strategic initiatives.

We may not be able to maintain or increase profitability.


Our ability to remain profitable depends uponuse our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes may be limited, or may expire prior to utilization.
Our ability to utilize our U.S. federal and state net operating losses or U.S. federal tax credits is currently limited, and may be limited further, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The limitations apply if an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, occurs. Generally, an ownership change occurs when certain shareholders change their aggregate ownership position by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage in a testing period, which is typically three years, or since the last ownership change. We are already subject to Section 382 limitations due to cumulative ownership changes that, as of November 15, 2013, totaled more than 50%. As of December 31, 2019, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $10.8 million and research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $4.2 million. Future changes in stock ownership may also trigger an additional ownership change and, consequently, another Section 382 or Section 383 limitation.
Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards before utilization, which would reduce our gross deferred income tax assets. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to generate increasing levels of revenues from sales ofuse our products, Oxtellar XRpre-change net operating loss carryforwards and Trokendi XR, while simultaneously funding the requisite research expenditurestax credit carryforwards to gain FDA approval for our product candidates. Since 2013, the first year inreduce U.S. federal and state income tax may be subject to limitations, which we generated revenue from our first commercial products, we have demonstrated the ability to become and remain profitable. Future revenues will depend highly on our ability to grow demand for our products and defend against potential generic competition, and successfully developing and commercializing our product candidates.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly.

We expect that any revenues we generate will fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year as a result of revenue from approved products, our license agreements, the amount of and timing for development milestones and product revenues received under our collaboration license agreements.

Our net income and other operating results will be affected by numerous factors, including:

us.

Table of Contents

Due to the various factors mentioned above, and others, the results of any prior quarterly period should not be relied upon as an indication of our future operating performance. If our quarterly operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any quarterly fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our stock to fluctuate substantially.

Complying with increased financial reporting and securities laws reporting requirements has increased our costs and requires additional management resources. We may fail to meet these obligations.

We face increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company. Compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, as well as rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ, for example, has resulted in significant initial cost to us as well as ongoing increases in our legal, audit and financial reporting costs. As of the beginning of 2017, we transitioned from "accelerated filer" to "large accelerated filer" status, which led to further increases in our legal, audit, NASDAQ listing fees and financial compliance costs. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. Our board of directors, management and outside advisors need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and require us to incur substantial and increasing costs to maintain the same or similar coverage.

As a public company, we are subject to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley ActSOX relating to internal controls over financial reporting. We have and expect to continue to incur significant expense and to devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with Section 404. We currently do not have an internal audit group, and we may need to hiregroup. We have hired additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge. We expect that we will have to compete in the market place for qualified accounting and financial staff and we may have difficulties identifying and attracting qualified persons.
Implementing any necessary changes to our internal controls may require specific compliance training for our directors, officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify or replace our existing accounting systems, and take a significant period of time to complete. Such changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls. Any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate consolidated financial statements or other reports on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially impair our ability to operate our business. We cannot assuregive assurance that our internal controls over financial reporting will prove to be effective.

We have identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and may identify material weaknesses in the futureour internal controls over financial reporting or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, which might cause stockholders to lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which in turn would harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.

Effective internal control over financial reporting and adequate disclosure controls and procedures are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports andreports. These are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing conducted by us conducted in connection with Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,SOX, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,SOX, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses. These may require prospective or retroactive changes to our consolidated financial statements or may identify other areas for further attention or improvement.

Our management has identified a Any system of internal controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions, and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 as described in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures below. As a result, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, has


Table of Contents

concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016. Although our management and the audit committee of our board of directors has formulated and is implementing a plan to remediate this material weakness, we expect implementation to continue to be time consuming, and the remedial actions we take may prove to be ineffective or inadequate. Any deficiencies or material weaknessweaknesses in our internal controls could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.


We are required to disclose changes made in our internal control procedures on a quarterly basis. Our management is required to assess the effectiveness of these controls annually. TheannualThe annual independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls is very expensive, and could continue to detect problems that our management's assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial statement restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.

We are continuing to refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we will file with the SEC is properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. We are also continuing to improve our internal controls over financial reporting. We have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources in order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
We may pursue acquisitions of new product lines or businesses.
Our acquisition strategy entails numerous risks. Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes may be limited.

Our ability to utilize our U.S. Federal and state net operating losses or U.S. Federal tax credits is currently limited, and may be limited further, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The limitations apply if an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, occurs. Generally, an ownership change occurs when certain shareholders change their aggregate ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage in a testing period, which is typically three years or since the last ownership change. We are already subject to Section 382 limitations due to cumulative ownership changes that, as of November 15, 2013, totaled more than 50%. As of December 31, 2016, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $87.3 million and research and development tax credit carryforwards of $7.1 million available. Future changes in stock ownership may also trigger an additional ownership change and, consequently, another Section 382 limitation. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards before utilization which would reduce our gross deferred income tax assets. As a result, if we earn net taxable income,complete future acquisitions will depend on our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards to reduce U.S. Federal and state income tax may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future cash tax liability to us.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

The Indenture governing the Notes contains restrictions that will limit our operating flexibility.

The Indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that, among other things, restrict our and our existing and future subsidiaries' ability to take specific actions, even ifidentify suitable acquisition candidates. If suitable candidates are identified, we believe them to be in our best interest. These covenants include restrictions on our ability to:

These covenants may limit our operational flexibility and could prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities as they arise, growing our business or competing effectively.

We may not be permitted, by the agreements governingable to negotiate commercially acceptable terms for their acquisition or, if necessary, to finance those acquisitions. We anticipate competition for attractive candidates from other parties, some of whom have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have. Whether or not any particular acquisition is successfully completed, each of these activities is expensive and time consuming and would likely require our existing or future indebtedness,management to pay any interest make-whole payment upon conversion in cash, requiring usspend considerable time and effort to issue shares for such amounts,complete, which would detract from our management's ability to run our current business. Although we may spend considerable funds and efforts to pursue acquisitions, we may not be able to complete them.

Acquisitions could result in significant dilutionthe occurrence of one or more of the following events:
Dilutive issuances of equity securities;
Incurrence of additional debt and contingent liabilities;
Increased amortization of expenses related to intangible assets;
Difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, services and products of the acquired companies
Diversion of management's attention from our stockholders.

If a holder elects to convert some or allother business activities; and

Assumption of their Notes, if, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) duringdebt and liabilities of the 30 consecutive trading day period ending within five trading days prior to a conversion date, the last reported sale price of our common stock exceeds the applicable conversion price on each such trading day,target company
We may have difficulties integrating acquisitions.
We cannot assure you that we will paybe able to complete acquisitions that we believe are necessary to complement our growth strategy on acceptable terms, or at all. Further, if we do successfully integrate the operations of any companies that we have acquired or subsequently acquire, we may not achieve the potential benefits of such holderacquisitions. Even if we are able to consummate an interest make-whole paymentacquisition, the transaction would present many risks, including, among others: failing to achieve anticipated revenues, profits, benefits or cost savings; difficulty incorporating and integrating the acquired technologies, services or products; difficulty in cashcoordinating, establishing or


Table expanding sales, distribution and marketing functions, as necessary; diversion of Contents

common stock formanagement's attention from other business concerns; being exposed to unanticipated or contingent liabilities from the Notes being converted. We haveacquired company, or incurring the option to issue our common stock to any converting holder in lieuimpairment of makinggoodwill; the interest make-whole payment in cash.loss of key employees or distribution partners; and difficulties implementing and maintaining sufficient controls, policies and procedures over the systems, products and processes of the acquired company. If we electdo not achieve the anticipated benefits of an acquisition as rapidly or to issue our common stock for such payment, then the stock will be valued at 95%extent anticipated by management, or if others do not perceive the same benefits of the simple averageacquisition as we do, there could be a material, adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition or results of the daily volume-weighted average price (VWAP) of our common stock for the 10 trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the conversion date. Agreements governing our existing or future indebtedness may prohibit us from making cash payments in respect of the interest make-whole amount upon a conversion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event will the shares we deliver in connection with a conversion, including those delivered in connection with the interest make-whole amount and repayment of principal, exceed 221.7294 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, subject to adjustment or, in aggregate, 19.96 million shares. If, pursuant to our election to deliver common stock in connection with the payment of the interest make-whole amount, we would be required to deliver a number of shares of common stock in excess of such threshold, we will deliver cash in lieu of any shares otherwise deliverable upon conversions in excess thereof (based on the simple average of the daily VWAP for the 10 trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the conversion date).

operations.

Risks Related to Securities Markets and Investment in Our Stock

We may issue additional shares of our common stock or instruments convertible into shares of our common stock including in connection with the conversion of our Notes, and thereby materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Sales of our common stock, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock, which would impair our ability to raise future capital through the sale of additional equity securities.


We may conduct future offerings of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities convertible into our common stock to fund acquisitions, finance operations or for other purposes. In addition, as of December 31, 2016,2019, we had outstanding 49,971,26752,533,348 shares of common stock, of which approximately 1,799,3561,959,294 shares are restricted securities that may be sold in accordance with the resale restrictions under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), or pursuant to a resale registration statement. Also, as of December 31, 2016,2019, we had outstanding options to purchase 3,644,0884,606,559 shares of common stock that, if exercised, would result in these additional shares becoming available for sale. Approximately 7.2%6% of these shares and options are held by senior management of the Company. We have also registered all common stock subject to options outstanding or reserved for issuance under our 2005 Stock Plan, 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. An aggregate of 4,387,4911,972,307 and 297,34054,081 shares of our common stock are reserved for future issuance under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, 863,403 shares of our common stock are presently reserved for future issuance upon conversion of the Notes. These shares will be eligible for resale in the public market upon issuance.

We have never paid dividends on our capital stock, and becausestock. Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain on an investment in our common stock.

We have paid no cash dividends on any of our classes of capital stock to date, and we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially.
The market price for our common stock historically has been volatile. In addition, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, including:
Fluctuations in stock market prices for the U.S. stock market;
The commercial performance of Oxtellar XR, Trokendi XR, or any of our product candidates that receive regulatory approval;
Substitution of our products in favor of generic versions of our products or competitors’ products;
Status of patent infringement law suits, if applicable;
The filing of ANDAs by generic companies seeking approval to market generic versions of our products;
Plans for, progress in, and results from clinical trials of our product candidates generally;
FDA or international regulatory actions, including actions on regulatory applications for any of our product candidates;
Announcements of new products, services or technologies, commercial relationships, acquisitions or other events by us or our competitors;
Market conditions and regulatory changes in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors;
Fluctuations in stock market prices and trading volumes of similar companies;
Variations in our quarterly operating results;
Changes in accounting principles;
Litigation or public concern about the safety of our products and/or potential products;
Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
Deviations in our operating results from the estimates of securities analysts;
Additions or departures of key personnel;
Sales or purchases of large blocks of our common stock, including sales by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders;
Changes in third-party coverage and reimbursement policies for our products and/or product candidates; and
Discussion by us of our stock price in the financial or scientific press or online investor communities.

Table

The realization of Contents

any of the risks described in these "Risk Factors" could have a dramatic, material and adverse impact on the market price of our common stock. In addition, class action litigation has often been instituted against companies whose securities have experienced periods of volatility. Any such litigation brought against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management attention, which could hurt our business, operating results and financial condition.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports or publish unfavorable research or reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. We currently have very limited research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If securities or industry analysts presently covering our business do not continue such coverage, or if additional securities or industry analysts do not commence coverage of our Company, the trading price for our stock could be negatively impacted. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover us or fails to regularly publish reports on us, interest in our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Anti-takeover provisions under our charter documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change of control, which could negatively impact the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as amended, may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control. These provisions include the following:

Our board of directors is divided into three classes, serving staggered three-year terms, such that not all members of the board will be elected at one time. This staggered board structure prevents stockholders from replacing the entire board at a single stockholders' meeting.

meeting;
Our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors.

directors;
Our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of preferred stock. The ability to authorize preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.

us;
Stockholders must provide advance notice to nominate individuals for election to the board of directors, or to propose matters that can be acted upon at a stockholders' meeting. Furthermore, stockholders may only remove a member of our board of directors for cause. These provisions may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect such acquiror's own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our Company.

Company;
Our stockholders may not act by written consent. As a result, a holder, or holders, controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be able to take certain actions outside of a stockholders' meeting.

meeting;
Special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of our board of directors or a majority of our board of directors. As a result, a holder, or holders, controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be able to call a special meeting.

meeting; and
A supermajority (75%) of the voting power of outstanding shares of our capital stock is required to amend, or repeal or to adopt any provision inconsistent with certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and to amend our by-laws, which make it more difficult to change the provisions described above.

In addition, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These and other provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and in the Delaware General Corporation Law, could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential


Table of Contents

acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors.

We may not be able to maintain an active public market for our common stock.

We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our common stock will allow us to maintain an active trading market on the NASDAQ Global Market or a similar market or how liquid that market might become.be. If an active public market is not sustained, it may be difficult to sell shares of common stock at a price that is attractive to the investor, or at all. Further, an inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, andor may impair our ability to enter into strategic partnerships or acquire companies or products, product candidates or technologies by using our shares of common stock as consideration.


To the extent outstanding stock options are exercised, there will be dilution to new investors.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had issued options to purchase 3,644,0884,606,559 shares of common stock outstanding, with exercise prices ranging from $0.40$2.56 to $22.80$58.15 per share and a weighted average exercise price of $10.25$23.05 per share. Upon the vesting of each of these options, the holder may exercise his or her options, which would result in dilution to investors.

Our indebtedness and liabilities could limit the cash flow available for our operations, expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and impair our ability to satisfy our obligations under the notes.
We incurred $402.5 million of additional indebtedness as a result of the sale of 0.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (2023 Notes). We may also incur additional indebtedness to meet future financing needs. Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences for our security holders and our business, results of operations and financial condition by, among other things:
Increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
Limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
Requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, which would reduce the amount of cash available for other purposes;
Limiting our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business;
Diluting the economic interests of our existing stockholders as a result of issuing shares of our common stock upon conversion of the 2023 Notes, notwithstanding the convertible hedge and warrant transactions; and
Placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage with competitors that are less leveraged than us or have better access to capital.
Our business may not generate sufficient funds, and we may otherwise be unable to maintain sufficient cash reserves, to pay amounts due under our indebtedness, including the 2023 Notes.
The issuance or sale of shares of our common stock, or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, could depress the trading price of our common stock and the 2023 Notes.
We may fluctuate substantially.

The market priceconduct future offerings of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock to finance our operations or fund acquisitions, or for other purposes. In addition, as of December 31, 2019, 4,606,559 shares of our common stock were reserved for future issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options, 1,972,307 shares were reserved for future issuance under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and 54,081 shares were reserved for future issuance under our 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

The indenture for the 2023 Notes will not restrict our ability to issue additional equity securities in the future. If we issue additional shares of our common stock or issue rights to acquire shares of our common stock, if any of our existing stockholders sells a substantial amount of our common stock, or if the market perceives that such issuances or sales may occur, then the trading price of our common stock, and, accordingly, the 2023 Notes, may significantly decrease. In addition, our issuance of additional shares of common stock will dilute the ownership interests of our existing common stockholders, including noteholders who have received shares of our common stock upon conversion of their 2023 Notes.
We may be unable to raise the funds necessary to repurchase the 2023 Notes for cash following a fundamental change, or to pay any cash amounts due upon conversion, and our other indebtedness may limit our ability to repurchase the 2023 Notes or pay cash upon their conversion.
Noteholders may require us to repurchase their 2023 Notes following a fundamental change, at a cash repurchase price generally equal to the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, upon conversion, we must satisfy part or all of our conversion obligation in cash unless we elect to settle conversions solely in shares of our common stock. We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to repurchase the 2023 Notes, or to pay the cash amounts due upon conversion. In addition, applicable law and/or regulatory authorities may restrict our ability to repurchase the 2023 Notes, or to pay the cash amounts due upon conversion. Our failure to repurchase 2023 Notes or to pay the cash amounts due upon conversion when required will constitute a default under the indenture. A default under the indenture or the fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under agreements governing our other indebtedness, which may result in other indebtedness becoming immediately payable in full. We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy all amounts due under the other indebtedness and under the 2023 Notes.

Provisions in the indenture could delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial takeover of us.
Certain provisions in the 2023 Notes and the indenture could make a third party attempt to acquire us more difficult or expensive. For example, if a takeover constitutes a fundamental change, then noteholders will have the right to require us to repurchase their 2023 Notes for cash, and we may be required to temporarily increase the conversion rate of the 2023 Notes. In either case, and in other cases, our obligations under the 2023 Notes and the indenture could increase the cost of acquiring us, or otherwise discourage a third party from acquiring us, to remove incumbent management, including in a transaction that noteholders or holders of our common shares may view as favorable.
The accounting method for the 2023 Notes could adversely affect our reported financial condition and results.
The accounting method for reflecting the 2023 Notes on our balance sheet, accruing interest expense for the Notes, and reflecting the underlying shares of our common stock in our reported diluted earnings per share may adversely affect our reported earnings and financial condition.
Under applicable accounting principles, we record the initial liability carrying amount of the 2023 Notes at the fair value of a similar debt instrument that does not have a conversion feature, and is valued using our cost of capital for straight, unconvertible debt. We reflect the difference between the net proceeds from this offering and the initial carrying amount as a debt discount for accounting purposes, with the debt discount being amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes. As a result of this amortization, the interest expense that we recognize for the 2023 Notes for accounting purposes will be greater than the cash interest payments we will pay on the 2023 Notes. This will result in lower reported net income. The lower reported income resulting from this accounting treatment could depress the trading price of our common stock and the 2023 Notes.
In addition, because we intend to settle conversions of the 2023 Notes by paying the conversion value in cash, up to the principal amount being converted and any excess in shares, we are eligible to use the treasury stock method to reflect the shares underlying the 2023 Notes in our diluted earnings per share. In order to continue to apply the treasury stock method, we will need to consider on a quarterly basis our ability and intent to settle conversions by paying the conversion value in cash up to the principal amount being converted.
Under the treasury method, if the conversion value of the 2023 Notes exceeds their principal amount for a reporting period, then we will calculate our diluted earnings per share assuming that all the 2023 Notes were converted and that we issue shares of our common stock to settle the excess. However, if reflecting the 2023 Notes in diluted earnings per share in this manner is anti-dilutive, or if the conversion value of the 2023 Notes does not exceed their principal amount for a reporting period, then the shares underlying the 2023 Notes will not be reflected in our diluted earnings per share.
If accounting standards change in the future or we determine that we are no longer able or intend to settle the conversion value in cash up to the principal amount being converted, and we, therefore, are no longer permitted to use the treasury stock method, then our diluted earnings per share may decline.
Furthermore, if any of the conditions to the convertibility of the notes are satisfied, then we may be required under applicable accounting standards to reclassify the liability carrying value of the notes as a current, rather than a long-term, liability. This reclassification could be required even if no noteholders convert their 2023 Notes. This could materially reduce our reported working capital.
The convertible note hedge transactions and the warrant transactions may affect the value of the notes and our common stock.
In connection with the pricing of the 2023 Notes, we entered into privately negotiated convertible note hedge transactions with the hedge counterparties. The convertible note hedge transactions cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, the number of shares of common stock that will initially underlie the 2023 Notes sold. We also entered into separate, privately negotiated warrant transactions with the hedge counterparties relating to the same number of shares of our common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments.
In connection with establishing their initial hedge positions with respect to the convertible note hedge transactions and the warrant transactions, we believe that the hedge counterparties and/or their affiliates entered into various cash-settled, over-the-counter derivative transactions with respect to our common stock, and/or purchased shares of our common stock concurrently. In addition, we expect that the hedge counterparties and/or their affiliates will modify their hedge positions with respect to the convertible note hedge transactions and the warrant transactions from time to time, and are likely to be volatile. In addition,do so during any observation period (as defined in the indenture) for the 2023 Notes, by purchasing and/or selling shares of our common stock and/or other securities of ours, including the 2023 Notes, in privately negotiated transactions and/or open-market transactions, or by entering into and/or unwinding various over-the-counter derivative transactions with respect to our common stock.

The effect, if any, of these activities on the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response toand the trading price of the 2023 Notes will depend on a numbervariety of factors, including:


Table of Contents

We are subject to counterparty risk with respect to the convertible note hedge transactions.
The hedge counterparties are financial institutions, and significant stockholders;

changes in third-party coverage and reimbursement policies for our products and/or product candidates; and

discussion by us or our stock pricewe will be subject to the risk that they might default in the fulfillment of their obligations under the convertible note hedge transactions. Our exposure to the credit risk of the hedge counterparties will not be secured by any collateral.
Global economic conditions have from time to time resulted in the actual or perceived failure or financial difficulties of many financial institutions, including the bankruptcy filing by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its various affiliates, as well as by Bear Stearns. If a hedge counterparty becomes subject to insolvency proceedings, we will become an unsecured creditor in those proceedings, with a claim equal to our exposure at that time under our transactions with that hedge counterparty. Our exposure will depend on many factors, but, generally, the increase in our exposure will be correlated with the increase in the market price and in the volatility of our common stock. In addition, upon a default by a hedge counterparty, we may suffer adverse tax consequences and suffer more dilution than we currently anticipate with respect to our common stock. We can provide no assurances as to the financial stability or scientific press or online investor communities.

The realizationviability of any hedge counterparty.

Conversion of the risks described2023 Notes or exercise of the warrants evidenced by the warrant transactions may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, including noteholders who have previously converted their 2023 Notes.
At our election, we may settle 2023 Notes tendered for conversion entirely or partly in these "Risk Factors"shares of our common stock. Furthermore, the warrants evidenced by the warrant transactions are expected to be settled on a net-share basis. As a result, the conversion of some or all of the 2023 Notes, or the exercise of some or all of such warrants may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon such conversion of the 2023 Notes, or such exercise of the warrants, could have a dramatic, material and adverse impact on theadversely affect prevailing market price of our common stock. In addition, class action litigation has often been instituted against companies whose securities have experienced periodsthe existence of volatility. Any such litigation brought against usthe 2023 Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the 2023 Notes could result in substantial costs and a diversiondepress the price of management attention, which could hurt our business, operating results and financial condition.

common stock.

ITEM 1B.     UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES.

Our principal executive offices are located at 1550 East Gude Drive,9715 and 9717 Key West Avenue, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, where we occupy approximately 44,500136,016 square feet of laboratory and office space. OurThe term of this lease term expires incommenced on February 1, 2019 and shall continue until April 30, 2020, with an option for a five-year extension. We also lease approximately 20,530 square feet of office space in an adjacent building to our existing office space located at 1500 East Gude Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 with a co-terminus lease term date of April 30, 2020.2034. We believe that these facilities are sufficient for our present and contemplated operations.

ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, we aremay be subject to various claims, charges and litigation. We may be required to file infringement claims against third parties for the infringement of our patents. We have filed such claims for infringementAs of the Orange Book patents listed for our products Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., et al., C.A. Nos. 13-4740; 14-1981 (RMB)(JS) (D.N.J.)
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., et al., Appeal No. 2016-1619 (Fed. Cir.)

We received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter against two of our Oxtellar XR Orange Book patents (United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131) from generic drug maker Watson Laboratories, Inc.—Florida (WLF) n/k/a Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. (Actavis Labs FL) on June 26, 2013. On August 7, 2013, we filed a lawsuit against Actavis, Inc., Actavis Labs FL, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., and ANDA, Inc. (collectively Actavis) alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131. We received a second Paragraph IV Notice Letter against a later-issued Oxtellar XR Orange Book Patent (United States Patent No. 8,617,600) on February 20, 2014. On March 28, 2014, we filed a second lawsuit against Actavis alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,617,600. We have since listed four additional Orange Book patents: United States Patent Nos. 8,821,930, 9,119,791, 9,351,975, and 9,370,525. Our United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898, 7,910,131, 8,617,600, 8,821,930, 9,119,791, 9,351,975, and 9,370,525 generally cover once-a-day oxcarbazepine formulations and methods of treating seizures using those formulations. The FDA Orange Book lists all seven of our Oxtellar XR patents as expiring on April 13, 2027.

Both Complaints—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleged, inter alia, that Actavis infringed our Oxtellar XR patents by submitting to the FDA an Abbreviated New Drug


Table of Contents

Application (ANDA) seeking to market a generic version of Oxtellar XR prior to the expiration of our patents. The two cases were consolidated for all purposes on October 8, 2015.

A seven-day bench trial for the consolidated action involving United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898, 7,910,131, and 8,617,600 was held between November 18 and December 4, 2015. On February 5, 2016, the Court issued an opinion and order finding that: (i) Actavis's ANDA products infringe United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131; (ii) Actavis's ANDA products do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,617,600; and (iii) United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898, 7,910,131, and 8,617,600 are not invalid. The Court entered a final judgment on February 18, 2016: (i) enjoining the FDA from approving Actavis's ANDA before the expiration date of United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131; and (ii) enjoining Actavis from commercially manufacturing, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing into the United States, Actavis's ANDA products until the expiration of United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131. On February 19, 2016, Actavis filed a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The parties executed a Partial Settlement Agreement in May 2016 that provided for the dismissal of all appeals, cross-appeals, claims, and counterclaims concerning U.S. Patent Nos. 8,617,600, 8,821,930, and 9,119,791. The appeal with respect to United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131 (docketed on February 24, 2016) was argued on December 8, 2016. On December 12, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's February 18, 2016 Final Judgment.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 15-2499 (RMB)(JS) (D.N.J.)

We received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter against United States Patent No. 8,821,930 from Actavis Labs FL on February 21, 2015. On April 7, 2015, we filed a third lawsuit against Actavis alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 8,821,930.

The Complaint—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleged, inter alia, that Actavis infringed United States Patent No. 8,821,930 by submitting to the FDA an ANDA seeking to market a generic version of Oxtellar XR prior to the expiration of United States Patent No. 8,821,930.

The parties executed a Partial Settlement Agreement in May 2016 that provided for the dismissal of both parties' claims and counterclaims concerning U.S. Patent No. 8,821,930.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 15-369 (RMB)(JS) (D.N.J.)

We received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter against United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898, 7,910,131, 8,617,600, and 8,821,930 from generic drug maker TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on December 9, 2014. On January 16, 2015, we filed a lawsuit against TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and TWi International LLC (d/b/a TWi Pharmaceuticals USA) (collectively TWi) alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898, 7,910,131, 8,617,600, and 8,821,930.

The Complaint—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleged, inter alia, that TWi infringed our Oxtellar XR patents by submitting to the FDA an ANDA seeking to market a generic version of Oxtellar XR prior to the expiration of our patents. Filing the Complaint within 45 days of receiving TWi's Paragraph IV certification notice entitles Supernus to an automatic stay preventing the FDA from approving TWi's ANDA for 30 months from the date of our receipt of the first Paragraph IV certification notice. On February 13, 2015, TWi answered the Complaint and denied the substantive allegations of the Complaint. TWi also asserted Counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898 and 7,910,131. On March 20, 2015, we filed our Reply, denying the substantive allegations of those Counterclaims.

The parties have completed fact and expert discovery, and are preparing final joint pretrial submissions. Trial is scheduled to begin on April 3, 2017.


Table of Contents

We received a second Paragraph IV Notice Letter against United States Patent Nos. 7,722,898, 7,910,131, 8,617,600, 8,821,930, 9,119,791, 9,351,975, and 9,370,525 from generic drug maker TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on February 16, 2017. We are currently evaluating this Notice Letter and determining how to proceed.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 15-8342 (RMB)(JS) (D.N.J.)

We received a Paragraph IV Notice Letter against United States Patent No. 9,119,791 from Actavis Labs FL on October 15, 2015. On November 25, 2015, we filed a fourth lawsuit against Actavis alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 9,119,791.

The Complaint—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleged, inter alia, that Actavis infringed United States Patent No. 9,119,791 by submitting to the FDA an ANDA seeking to market a generic version of Oxtellar XR prior to the expiration of United States Patent No. 9,119,791. On January 29, 2016, Actavis answered the Complaint, denying the substantive allegations of that Complaint. Actavis Labs FL also asserted Counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of United States Patent No. 9,119,791. On March 4, 2016, we filed our Reply, denying the substantive allegations of those Counterclaims.

The parties executed a Partial Settlement Agreement in May 2016 that provided for the dismissal of both parties' claims and counterclaims concerning U.S. Patent No. 9,119,791.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., C.A. No. 14-6102 (SDW)(LDW) (D.N.J.)

We received three Paragraph IV Notice Letters against six Trokendi XR Orange Book patents, namely United States Patent Nos. 8,298,576, 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191, and 8,992,989 from generic drug maker Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. These patents cover once-a-day topiramate formulations and methods of treating seizures using those formulations. On October 1, 2014, we initiated a lawsuit against Actavis; the lawsuit alleges infringement of the Trokendi XR Orange Book patents. The FDA Orange Book currently lists United States Patent No. 8,298,576 as expiring on April 4, 2028 and United States Patent Nos. 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191, and 8,992,989 as expiring on November 16, 2027.

This action for patent infringement—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleges that Actavis infringed the Trokendi XR patents by, inter alia, submitting to the FDA an ANDA seeking to market a generic version of Trokendi XR prior to the expiration of these patents. Actavis answered these allegations with affirmative defenses and counterclaims of noninfringement and invalidity of the patents in suit. Filing its October 1, 2014 Complaint within 45 days of receiving the first of three Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. Paragraph IV Notice Letters entitles Supernus to an automatic stay preventing the FDA from approving Actavis's ANDA for 30 months from the date of our receipt of such Notice Letter.

The Company announced on March 7, 2017 that it has entered into a binding term sheet with Actavis regarding the settlement of this case. The binding term sheet permits Actavis to begin selling a generic version of Trokendi XR on January 1, 2023, or earlier under certain circumstances. On March 13, 2017,31, 2019, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Actavis. The agreements will be submitted to the applicable governmental agencies.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., C.A. No. 14-7272 (SDW)(LDW) (D.N.J.)

We received three Paragraph IV Notice Letters against six Trokendi XR Orange Book patents, namely United States Patent Nos. 8,298,576, 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191, and 8,992,989 from generic drug maker Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. These patents cover once-a-day topiramate

has no material pending legal proceedings.

Table of Contents

formulations and methods of treating seizures using those formulations. On November 21, 2014, we initiated a lawsuit against Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Limited (collectively Zydus); the lawsuit alleges infringement of the Trokendi XR Orange Book patents. The FDA Orange Book currently lists United States Patent No. 8,298,576 as expiring on April 4, 2028 and United States Patent Nos. 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191 and 8,992,989 as expiring on November 16, 2027.

This action for patent infringement—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleges that Zydus infringed the Trokendi XR patents by, inter alia, submitting to the FDA an ANDA seeking to market a generic version of Trokendi XR prior to the expiration of these patents. Zydus answered these allegations with affirmative defenses and counterclaims of noninfringement and invalidity of the patents in suit. Filing its November 21, 2014 Complaint within 45 days of receiving the first of three Paragraph IV Notice Letters from Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. entitles Supernus to an automatic stay preventing the FDA from approving Zydus's ANDA for 30 months from the date of our receipt of such Notice Letter.

The Company announced on March 6, 2017 that it has entered into a settlement agreement with Zydus regarding this case. The settlement permits Zydus to begin selling a generic version of Trokendi XR on January 1, 2023, or earlier under certain circumstances. A stipulation and order of dismissal without prejudice was entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The agreement will be submitted to the applicable governmental agencies.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., C.A. No. 15-326 (SDW)(LDW) (D.N.J.)

We received three Paragraph IV Notice Letters against six Trokendi XR Orange Book patents, namely United States Patent Nos. 8,298,576, 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191, and 8,992,989 from generic drug maker Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. These patents cover once-a-day topiramate formulations and methods of treating seizures using those formulations. On January 16, 2015, we initiated a lawsuit against Par; the lawsuit alleges infringement of the Trokendi XR Orange Book patents. The FDA Orange Book currently lists United States Patent No. 8,298,576 as expiring on April 4, 2028 and United States Patent Nos. 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191, and 8,992,989 as expiring on November 16, 2027.

This action for patent infringement—filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—alleges that Par infringed the Trokendi XR patents by, inter alia, submitting to the FDA an ANDA seeking to market a generic version of Trokendi XR prior to the expiration of these patents. Par answered these allegations with affirmative defenses and counterclaims of noninfringement and invalidity of the patents in suit. Filing its January 16, 2015 Complaint within 45 days of receiving the first of three Paragraph IV Notice Letters from Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. entitles Supernus to an automatic stay preventing the FDA from approving Par's ANDA for 30 months from the date of our receipt of such Notice Letter.

The Company announced on October 15, 2015 that it has entered into a settlement agreement with Par regarding this case. The settlement permits Par to begin selling a generic version of Trokendi XR on April 1, 2025, or earlier under certain circumstances. The agreement is subject to a consent judgment that was entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. In the consent judgment, Par acknowledges that the Orange Book-listed patents for Trokendi XR owned by Supernus, namely United States Patent Nos. 8,298,576, 8,298,580, 8,663,683, 8,877,248, 8,889,191, and 8,992,989, are valid and enforceable with respect to Par's ANDA product, and would be infringed by Par's ANDA product. The agreement has been submitted to the applicable governmental agencies.

ITEM 4.     MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.


Table of Contents


PART II

ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market and Shareholder Information
Our common stock has been listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "SUPN" since May 1, 2012. Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for our common stock. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low intra-day sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market.

 
 High Low 

2016

       

First Quarter

 $15.99 $9.51 

Second Quarter

 $20.38 $14.14 

Third Quarter

 $26.84 $20.19 

Fourth Quarter

 $27.10 $17.25 

2015

  
 
  
 
 

First Quarter

 $12.38 $7.97 

Second Quarter

 $18.55 $11.11 

Third Quarter

 $23.30 $13.32 

Fourth Quarter

 $20.39 $12.54 

On December 31, 2016,2019, the closing price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market was $25.25$23.72 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had 1519 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of common stockholders is greater than the number of record holders, and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number of holders of record also does not include stockholders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.

Dividends
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not currently anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance operations. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, financial conditions, future prospects, contractual restrictions and covenants and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Option Grants
During the three months ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company granted options to employees to purchase an aggregate of 22,25013,100 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $22.80$22.99 per share. The options are exercisable for a period of ten years from the grant date. These issuances were exempt from registration in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as transactions not involving any public offering.

Performance Graph
The following graph sets forth the Company's total cumulative stockholder return as compared to the NASDAQ Stock Market Composite Index and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, for the period beginning May 1, 2012December 31, 2014 and ending December 31, 2016. 2019.
Total stockholder return assumes $100 invested at the beginning of the period in the common stock of the Company, the stocks represented in the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical, respectively. Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends; the Company has paid no dividends on its common stock. Historical price performance should not be relied upon as indicative of future stock performance.


a201910kitem5totalperformace.jpg

Table of Contents


COMPARISON OF 44 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index
and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index


*
$100 invested on 5/1/12 in stock or 4/30/12 in each index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

*$100 invested on 12/31/2014 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

Performance Graph Data


 Supernus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 NASDAQ
Composite Index
 NASDAQ
Pharmaceuticals
Index
 

May 1, 2012

 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 

December 31, 2012

 133.52 99.81 115.72 

December 31, 2013

 140.41 141.87 195.46 
Supernus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 NASDAQ Composite
Index
 NASDAQ
Pharmaceuticals
Index

December 31, 2014

 154.56 161.78 252.03 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00

December 31, 2015

 250.28 171.75 261.96 161.93
 106.96
 103.06

December 31, 2016

 470.20 185.66 207.12 304.22
 116.45
 81.93
December 31, 2017480.12
 150.96
 98.23
December 31, 2018400.24
 146.67
 92.83
December 31, 2019285.78
 200.49
 109.06

The performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or be "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following selected financial data should be read together with the information under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 and balance sheet data as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 set forth below have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected statement of operationsearnings data for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 set forth below hashave been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for such year not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The historical periods presented here are not necessarily indicative of future results.




Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 

Revenue

                

Net product sales

 $210,078 $143,526 $89,571 $11,552 $ 

Royalty revenue

  4,686  3,038  633     

Licensing revenue

  239  901  2,474  467  1,480 

Total revenue

  215,003  147,465  92,678  12,019  1,480 

Costs and expenses

                

Cost of product sales

  11,986  8,423  5,758  1,104   

Research and development

  42,791  29,135  19,586  17,245  23,517 

Selling, general and administrative

  106,010  89,063  72,612  55,590  20,132 

Total costs and expenses

  160,787  126,621  97,956  73,939  43,649 

Operating income (loss)

  54,216  20,844  (5,278) (61,920) (42,169)

Other income (expense)

                

Interest income

  1,482  643  348  299  120 

Interest expense

  (543) (1,229) (4,963) (7,849) (3,575)

Interest expense-nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  (4,548) (3,541) (658)    

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities

  448  193  2,809  (13,354) (710)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (671) (2,338) (2,592) (9,550)  

Other (loss) income

  (15) 38  39  101  50 

Total other expense

  (3,847) (6,234) (5,017) (30,353) (4,115)

Earnings (loss) before income tax

  50,369  14,610  (10,295) (92,273) (46,284)

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (40,852) 666  630     

Net income (loss)

  91,221  13,944  (10,925) (92,273) (46,284)

Cumulative dividends on Series A convertible preferred stock

          (1,143)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $91,221 $13,944 $(10,925)$(92,273)$(47,427)

Income (loss) per common share:

                

Basic

 $1.84 $0.29 $(0.26)$(2.90)$(2.72)

Diluted

 $1.76 $0.28 $(0.26)$(2.90)$(2.72)

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:

                

Basic

  49,472,434  47,485,258  42,260,896  31,848,299  17,440,910 

Diluted

  51,708,983  51,160,380  42,260,896  31,848,299  17,440,910 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
 
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Statements of Earnings Data:

         
Revenues$392,755
 $408,897
 $302,238
 $215,003
 $147,465
Net earnings113,056
 110,993
 57,284
 91,221
 13,944
Earnings per share         
Basic$2.16
 $2.13
 $1.13
 $1.84
 $0.29
Diluted2.10
 2.05
 1.08
 1.76 0.28
Weighted-average shares outstanding         
Basic52,412,181
 51,989,824
 50,756,603
 49,472,434
 47,485,258
Diluted53,816,754
 54,098,872
 53,301,150
 51,708,983
 51,160,380
          
Balance Sheet and Other Data:         
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities$347,073
 356,018
 140,040
 90,121
 62,190
Long term marketable securities591,773
 418,798
 133,638
 75,410
 55,009
Working capital312,057
 332,134
 105,451
 70,662
 49,012
Total assets1,160,282
 977,811
 424,464
 309,568
 188,626
Convertible notes, net345,170
 329,462
 
 4,165
 7,085
Non-recourse liability related to sale of future royalties (1)
22,492
 24,758
 26,541
 30,390
 30,528
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)199,548
 86,492
 (26,823) (84,288) (175,509)
Total stockholders' equity595,428
 453,023
 267,480
 191,755
 88,007

Table of Contents



 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities

 $90,121 $62,190 $74,336 $82,191 $88,508 

Long term marketable securities

  75,410  55,009  19,816  8,756   

Working capital

  70,662  49,012  80,603  70,761  68,479 

Total assets

  309,568  188,626  136,784  110,995  93,989 

Convertible notes, net of discount

  4,165  7,085  26,223  34,393   

Nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  30,390  30,528  30,025     

Secured notes payable, including current portion

          22,897 

Accumulated deficit

  (84,288) (175,509) (189,453) (178,528) (86,255)

Total stockholders' equity

  191,755  88,007  40,699  33,464  57,570 
(1)Includes both short term and long term obligations.



Table of Contents

ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical information, some of the information in this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations and involvesinvolving risk and uncertainties. For example, statements regarding our expectations as to our plans and strategy for our business, future financial performance, expense levels and liquidity sources are forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of those events could differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements as a resultbecause of many factors, including those set forth under the "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in this report.

Overview

We are a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases. In 2013, we launched Oxtellar XR (extended-release oxcarbazepine)We have a portfolio of commercial products and Trokendi XR (extended-release topiramate), our two novel treatments for epilepsy. Since that time, we have significantly grown our net product sales.

candidates.

Commercial Products
Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR were the first once-daily extended release oxcarbazepine and topiramate products indicated for patients with epilepsy launched in the U.S.United States (U.S.) market. Net product sales from these products reached $210.1 million in 2016 representing significant growth compared to the $143.5 million in net product sales in 2015.

We are continuing to expand our intellectual property portfolio to provide additional protection for our technologies, products, and product candidates. We currently have seven issued U.S. patents covering

Oxtellar XR and eight issued U.S. patents covering is indicated for the treatment of epilepsy.
Trokendi XR withis indicated for the patents expiring no earlier than 2027treatment of epilepsy and for each product.

Data from Intercontinental Marketing Services (IMS) shows 136,145the prophylaxis of migraine headache.

Product Prescriptions
The following table provides data regarding our prescriptions, were filled for both drugsas reported by IQVIA, during the three months ended December 31, 2016, representingperiods indicated below:
 Years Ended December 31,  Change
 2019 2018 Volume Percent
Prescriptions       
Trokendi XR672,485
 638,923
 33,562
 5%
Oxtellar XR163,914
 147,488
 16,426
 11%
Total prescriptions836,399
 786,411
 49,988
 6%
Product Candidates and Recent Developments
SPN-812, a 22.0% increase over the 111,627novel non-stimulant product prescriptionscandidate for the fourth quartertreatment of 2015. Product prescriptions for Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR totaled 506,542 for the year ended 2016, a 33.9% increase over the 378,173 product prescriptions for the year ended 2015. We expect the number of prescriptions filled for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR to continue to increase in the future.

Net product sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled $210.1 million, an increase of 46.4% over 2015. Net product sales for the fourth quarter of 2016 were $61.1 million, compared to net product sales of $42.6 million for the same quarter last year, an increase of 43.4%.

Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled $54.2 million compared to an operating income of $20.8 million in 2015, an increase of $33.4 million or 160.6%.

We received several Paragraph IV Notice Letters concerning Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR from various third-parties, asserting that our patents are invalid, or that our patents are not infringed by their formulations, or both. In response to these Paragraph IV notice letters, we initiated litigation against these third parties alleging infringement of our intellectual property rights. In October 2015, we reached a settlement agreement with one of these generic drug makers, Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., concerning our Trokendi XR patents. In 2016, the U.S. District Court and Federal Court of Appeals ruled in our favor against Actavis concerning Oxtellar XR patents. In March 2017, we signed settlement agreements with two other generic drug makers, Actavis and Zydus, concerning our Trokendi XR patents. We intend to vigorously defend our intellectual property rights against TWi concerning our Oxtellar XR patents. We anticipate continuing to incur substantial amounts of legal fees


Table of Contents

and related expenses for these cases as they progress. (See Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings for additional information.)

We are developing multiple product candidates in psychiatry to address large unmet medical needs and market opportunities. We are developing SPN-810 (molindone hydrochloride) to treat impulsive aggression (IA) in patients who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There are currently no approved products indicatedOn January 2020, we received the acceptance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the review of the New Drug Application (NDA) for SPN-812 for the treatment of IA.ADHD in pediatric patients. We arehave also developinginitiated a novel non-stimulant product candidate SPN-812 (viloxazine hydrochloride) to treat patients who have ADHD.

We initiated two Phase III clinical trialstrial for SPN-810 duringthe treatment of adult patients with ADHD in the third quarter of 2015 and2019.

SPN-604, a novel product candidate for the treatment of bipolar disorder. We initiated a pivotal Phase IIb clinical trialIII study for SPN-812the treatment of bipolar disorder in the fourth quarter of 2015. We expect to continue recruiting2019. If approved, SPN-604 would represent the first approval for the treatment of bipolar disorder with oxcarbazepine in the two Phase III clinical trials for SPN-810 during 2017. ResultsU.S.
SPN-817, a novel product candidate for the Phase IIb clinical trialtreatment of severe epilepsy. We initiated an Investigational New Drug (IND) application enabling preclinical activities in the U.S. and have received an Orphan Drug designation for SPN-812 were announced in 2016. Subsequent to holding an endDravet Syndrome from the FDA.
SPN-809, a novel product candidate for the treatment of depression is Phase II meeting with the FDA, we plan to initiate Phase III clinical trials for SPN-812 during the second half of 2017.

ready.

We expect to incur significant research and development expenses related to the continued development of each of our product candidates with a total cost of approximately $85 million to $90 million for each of the two programs, from 20172020 through FDA approval.

On January 19, 2017, Shire announced thatapproval or until the FDA acknowledged receiptprogram terminates. See Part I, Item I—Business for a complete description of the Class 2 resubmission of a New Drug Application (NDA) for SHP465, for the treatment of ADHD. The FDA is expectedour product and product candidates and development programs.


Intellectual property portfolio
We continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio to provide additional protection for our technologies, products, and product candidates. See Part I, Item I—Business, Intellectual Property and Exclusivity, for a decision on or around June 20, 2017. If approved by the FDA, SHP465 is expected to be launched by Shire in the second halfcomplete description of 2017. SHP465 was originally developed by Shire Laboratories, the former division of Shire which subsequently became Supernus Pharmaceuticals. Based on the agreement between Supernus and Shire, Shire will pay to Supernus a single digit percentage royalty on net sales of the product.

our intellectual property position.

Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates

The significant accounting policies and bases of presentation for our consolidated financial statements are described in Note 2, "SummarySummary of Significant Accounting Policies."Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and to disclose contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

We believe the following accounting policies and estimates to be critical:

Revenue from Product Sales

RevenueRecognition

Revenues from product sales are recognized when physical control of our products is recognized when: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurredtransferred to our customers, who are primarily pharmaceutical wholesalers and title to the product and associated risk of loss has passed to the customer; the price is fixed or determinable; collection from the customer has been reasonably assured; all performance obligations have been met; and returns and allowances can be reasonably estimated.distributors. Product sales are recorded net of various forms of variable consideration, including: estimated rebates, chargebacks, discounts, allowances, copay assistancerebates; sales discounts; and other deductions as well asan estimated liability for future product returns (collectively, "sales deductions"“sales deductions”).

We baseadjust our estimated sales deductions on an analysisestimates at the earlier of historical levelswhen the most likely amount of deductions specificconsideration we expect to each product. In addition, we also considerreceive changes, or when the impact of actual or anticipated changes in product price, sales trends and changes in managed care coverage and copay assistance programs.consideration becomes fixed. For a complete description of Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR gross revenues and gross to net adjustments,our revenue recognition policy, see Part II, Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplemental Data,- Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesRevenue from Product Sales.


Table of Contents

Deferred Legal Fees

Deferred legal fees are comprised of costs incurred in connection with the defense of patents for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR (see Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings).

Deferred legal fees have been incurred in connection with legal proceedings related to the defense of patents for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR (see Part II, Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 6). AmortizationSales of the deferred legal fees will begin upon successful outcome of the on-going litigation. Deferred legal fees will be chargedNotes to expense in the event of an unsuccessful outcome of the on-going litigation.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

Research and Development Expenses

and Related Accrued Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred. ResearchWe estimate preclinical and development costs primarily consist of employee-relatedclinical trial expenses including salaries and benefits; share-based compensation expense; expenses incurred under agreementsbased on services performed pursuant to contracts with research institutions, clinical investigators, clinical research organizations (CROs), fees paid to investigators who are participating in our clinical trials, consultants and other vendorsservice providers that conduct activities on the Company's clinical trials;Company’s behalf. If the costactual timing of acquiringthe performance of services or the level of effort varies from our estimate, we adjust our accrued expenses or our deferred advance payments accordingly. For a complete description of our research and manufacturingdevelopment expense and preclinical and clinical trial materials;accrual policies, see Part II, Item 8 - Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesResearch and Development Expense and Related Accrued Research and Development Expenses, in the cost of manufacturing materials used in process validation,Notes to the extent that those materials are manufactured prior to receiving regulatory approval for those productsConsolidated Financial Statements.
Preclinical and are not expected to be sold commercially; facilities costs that do not have an alternative future use; related depreciation and other allocated expenses; license fees for and milestone payments related to in-licensed products and technologies; and costs associated with animal testing activities and regulatory approvals.

Accrued Clinical Expenses

Clinicalclinical trials are inherently complex and often involve multiple service providers, and can include payments made to investigator physicians at study sites.providers. Because billing for services often lags delivery of service by a substantial amount of time,month or several months, we are often are required to estimate, and therefore accrue, a significant portion of our accrued clinicalthe incurred expenses. This process involves reviewing open contracts and communicating with our subject matter expert personnel, andas well as with the appropriate service provider personnel to identify services that have been performed on our behalf.behalf but for which no invoice has been received. This includes services provided by CROs, as well as services provided by clinical investigators and other service providers. We accrue for the estimated butcost for unbilled services performed, and the associated costs incurred.

whether partially or fully completed.

Payments to service providers can either be based on hourly rates for services providedservice or based on achievement of performance driven milestones. We work with each service provider to obtain an estimate for services provided but as yet unbilled as of the end of the calendar quarter, including estimates for payments to site investigators. When accruing clinical trial expenses, we estimate the time period over which services will be performed during the life of the entire clinical program, the total cost of the program, and the level of effort to be expended in each intervening period. To the maximum extent possible, we work with each service provider to provide an estimate for incurred but unbilled services as of the end of the calendar quarter. This includes estimates for payments to site investigators.

We work diligently to minimize, if not eliminate, estimates based solely on companyCompany generated calculations.calculations by relying primarily on estimates provided by our vendors. If we and/or the service provider underestimates or overestimates the costcosts associated with a trial or service at any given point in time, adjustments to research and development expenses may be necessary in futurethe following periods. Historically, our estimated accrued clinical expenses have closely approximated the actual expenses incurred.

incurred, with minimal adjustments to expense in the subsequent periods.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison

Consolidated Results Review

In this section, we discuss the results of our operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2016 and2018 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
 
 
 Increase/
(decrease)
 
 
 2016 2015 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Revenues:

          

Net product sales

 $210,078 $143,526  66,552 

Royalty revenue

  4,686  3,038  1,648 

Licensing revenue

  239  901  (662)

Total revenues

  215,003  147,465    

Costs and expenses

          

Cost of product sales

  11,986  8,423  3,563 

Research and development

  42,791  29,135  13,656 

Selling, general and administrative

  106,010  89,063  16,947 

Total costs and expenses

  160,787  126,621    

Operating income

  54,216  20,844    

Other income (expense)

          

Interest income and other income, net

  1,467  681  786 

Interest expense

  (543) (1,229) 686 

Interest expense-nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  (4,548) (3,541) (1,007)

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities

  448  193  255 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (671) (2,338) 1,667 

Total other expenses

  (3,847) (6,234)   

Earnings before income taxes

  50,369  14,610    

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (40,852) 666  (41,518)

Net income

 $91,221 $13,944    

Net Product Sales.    Net product sales are based2017, please refer to Part II, Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on gross revenue from shipments to distributors, less estimates for discounts, rebates, allowances, other sales deductions and returns. Our net product sales of $210.1 millionForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018, which discussion is comprised of $51.7 million of revenue from Oxtellar XRincorporated by reference herein.

The following table displays our revenues, costs and $158.4 million of revenue from Trokendi XR. The increase in net product sales from 2016 to 2015 is primarily driven by increased prescriptions.

Our net product sales of $143.5 millionexpenses, other (expense) income and income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 were comprised of $33.2 million of revenue from Oxtellar XR and $110.3 million of revenue from Trokendi XR.

Royalty Revenue.    Non-cash royalty revenue of $4.7 million and $3.0 million was generated during the years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018 and December 31, 2015, respectively, pursuant2017 (dollars in thousands):

       2019 vs 2018 Change 2018 vs 2017 Change
 2019 2018 2017 Dollar Percent Dollar Percent
  
  
        
  
Net product sales$383,400
 $399,871
 $294,097
 $(16,471) (4)% $105,774
 36%
Royalty revenue9,355
 8,276
 6,367
 1,079
 13% 1,909
 30%
Cost of goods sold16,660
 15,356
 15,215
 1,304
 9% 141
 1%
Research and development69,099
 89,209
 49,577
 (20,110) (23)% 39,632
 80%
Selling, general and administrative158,425
 159,888
 137,905
 (1,463) (1)% 21,983
 16%
Other (expense) income(1,084) (4,268) 1,077
 3,184
 (75)% (5,345) (496)%
Income tax expense34,431
 29,183
 43,334
 5,248
 18% (14,151) (33)%
Net earnings113,056
 110,993
 57,284
 2,063
 2% 53,709
 94%
Net Product Sales
Net product sales are computed as gross revenue generated from our product shipments to our customers, which are primarily pharmaceutical wholesalers and distributors, less various forms of variable consideration, including: estimated liability for rebates; estimated liability for future product returns; and estimated allowance for discounts. These are collectively considered "sales deductions."
The table below lists our net product sales by products (dollars in thousands):
 

Years Ended December 31,
 2019 vs 2018 Change 2018 vs 2017 Change
 2019 2018 2017 Dollar Percent Dollar Percent
Trokendi XR$295,214
 $315,295
 $226,518
 $(20,081) (6)% $88,777
 39%
Oxtellar XR88,186
 84,576
 67,579
 3,610
 4% 16,997
 25%
Total$383,400
 $399,871
 $294,097
 $(16,471) (4)% $105,774
 36%
Overall
2019 compared to 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2018, wholesalers, distributors and pharmacies increased their inventory holdings when compared to the prevailing inventory levels in the third quarter of 2018. We estimated that this caused net product sales to be approximately $10 million higher in the fourth quarter of 2018 than it would otherwise have been, had channel inventory levels remained consistent from the third to the fourth quarter of 2018. The channel inventory build-up in the fourth quarter of 2018 was effectively reversed in the first quarter of 2019. Specifically, based on analysis of sales and inventory data, inventory levels at wholesalers, distributors and pharmacies returned to the prevailing levels in the third quarter of 2018. As a result of this channel inventory reduction, both gross sales and net product sales decreased in 2019 as compared to the prior year. The adverse impact on net product sales in 2019 due to the reduction in channel inventory is estimated to be approximately $10 million.
In addition to the aforementioned inventory reduction, unfavorable changes in sales deductions more than offset the favorable unit prescription growth of 6%, and the impact of an agreement8% price increase in 2019. Specifically, as regards sales deductions, patient reimbursement challenges and increased contracting pressure from managed care providers resulted in both increased per patient costs for our co-pay programs, higher per patient rebate payments to managed care providers, and higher Medicaid reimbursement payments. As a result, net product sales decreased by $16.5 million year over year.

Trokendi XR
2019 compared to 2018. Trokendi XR net product sales decreased by 6% in 2019 as compared to 2018. Compared to 2018, favorable unit prescription volume growth of 5% coupled with HC Royalty.

Licensing Revenue.    Total licensing revenuethe impact of an 8% price increase were offset by higher levels of net sales deductions. Increased sales deductions were driven primarily by increased per patient costs for our co-pay programs, higher per patient rebate payments to managed care providers, and higher Medicaid reimbursement payments. In addition, the majority of the impact of the $10 million channel inventory reduction, as described above, was reflected in lower net product sales for Trokendi XR in 2019.

Oxtellar XR
2019 compared to 2018. Oxtellar XR net product sales grew 4% in 2019 as compared to 2018. Compared to 2018, favorable unit prescription volume growth of 11% and the impact of an 8% price increase were offset by higher levels of sales deductions. Increased sales deductions were due primarily by higher per patient payments under both Medicaid and managed care programs, as well as higher co-pay program expenditures.
Sales deductions and related accruals
The Company records accrued product rebates and accrued product returns as current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets under Accrued product returns and rebates. We record sales discounts as a valuation allowance against Accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets. The outstanding amounts are affected by changes in level of gross sales, the provision for net product sales deductions and the timing of payments/credits.
The following table provides a summary of activities with respect to accrued product returns and rebates for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016 was $0.22019, 2018 and 2017 (dollars in thousands):
 Accrued Product Returns and Rebates    
 Product
Rebates
 Product
Returns
 Allowance for
Sales Discounts
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2017$49,460
 $18,883
 $8,892
 $77,235
Provision       
Provision for sales in current year240,368
 10,767
 59,245
 310,380
Adjustments relating to prior year sales(1,744) (75) (3) (1,822)
Total provision238,624
 10,692
 59,242
 308,558
Less: Actual payments/credits(203,081) (7,515) (56,586) (267,182)
Balance at December 31, 2018$85,003
 $22,060
 $11,548
 $118,611
        
Balance at December 31, 2018$85,003
 $22,060
 $11,548
 $118,611
Provision       
Provision for sales in current year307,430
 10,199
 61,123
 378,752
Adjustments relating to prior year sales(888) 549
 (43) (382)
Total provision306,542
 10,748
 61,080
 378,370
Less: Actual payments/credits(302,734) (13,990) (61,615) (378,339)
Balance at December 31, 2019$88,811
 $18,818
 $11,013
 $118,642
2019 compared to 2018. The total provision for sales deductions on gross product sales increased by $69.8 million, and $0.9from $308.6 million in 2015. There was $0.82018 to $378.4 million in revenue generated from achievement2019. Virtually all of milestonesthis increase was attributable to the year over year increase in the year ended December 31, 2015.

Cost of Product Sales.    Cost ofprovision for product sales during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $12.0rebates, from $238.6 million an increase of $3.6in 2018 to $306.5 million in 2019, or 42.9%, as compared to $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.$67.9 million. The year over year increase isin the provision for product rebates of $67.9 million was primarily attributable to greater utilization of our patient co-pay programs. In addition, patient reimbursement challenges and increased contracting pressure from managed care providers resulted in both increased per patient costs for our co-pay programs, higher per patient rebate payments to managed care providers, and higher Medicaid reimbursement payments. Growth in prescriptions and the impact of the 8% price increase taken in January contributed, to a lesser extent, to the increase in product rebates.

The provision for product returns of $10.7 million in 2019, remained essentially the same year over year due primarily to favorable returns experience, which offset the impact of the 8% price increase taken in January.

The provision for sales discounts increased by $1.9 million, from $59.2 million to $61.1 million in 2018 and 2019, respectively, because of the prescription volume growth.
Adjustments related to prior year sales due to changes in our estimates was relatively minor in both years; i.e., $0.4 million as compared to $383.4 million of net product sales in 2019, and $1.8 million as compared to $399.9 million of net product sales in 2018.
Royalty Revenue
Royalty revenue includes royalties from the following products (dollars in thousands):
 2019 2018 2017
Mydayis (1) 
$2,428
 $2,243
 $1,034
Orenitram (2)
6,927
 6,033
 5,283
Total$9,355
 $8,276
 $6,317
(1)     Royalty from net product sales of Mydayis, a product of Shire Plc (a subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd).
(2)     Noncash royalty revenue pursuant to our agreement with Healthcare Royalty Partners III, L.P. (HC Royalty). HC Royalty receives royalty payments from United Therapeutics Corporation (United Therapeutics) based on net product sales of United Therapeutics’ product Orenitram. Supernus records noncash royalty based on such product sales.
2019 Compared to 2018. Royalty revenue increased by approximately $1.1 million, or 13%, in 2019 as compared to 2018, due to increased product sales of Mydayis and Orenitram.
Cost of Goods Sold

The following table provides information regarding our cost of goods sold for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):
       2019 vs 2018 Change 2018 vs 2017 Change
 2019 2018 2017 Dollar Percent Dollar Percent
Cost of goods sold$16,660
 $15,356
 $15,215
 $1,304
 9% $141
 1%
2019 Compared to 2018. The year over year increase in cost of goods sold was attributable primarily to increased net product sales.


Tablehigher volume of Contents

products sold to our customers.

Research and Development Expense.    ResearchExpenses

The following table provides information regarding our research and development (R&D) expenses duringfor the year ended December 31, 2016 were $42.8years indicated (dollars in thousands):
       2019 vs 2018 Change 2018 vs 2017 Change
 2019 2018 2017 Dollar Percent Dollar Percent
Research and development expense$69,099
 $89,209
 $49,577
 $(20,110) (23)% $39,632
 80%
2019 Compared to 2018. R&D expenses decreased by $20.1 million in 2019 as compared to $29.12018, primarily driven by the completion of the four Phase III clinical trials for SPN-812 in late 2018/early 2019, and the one-time $14 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $13.7 million or 46.9%. This increase isexpense incurred in 2018 due to the conductacquisition of late stage clinical trials for both of our product candidates, SPN-810 and SPN-812. During 2016, we continuedBiscayne Neurotherapeutics Inc. These reductions were partially offset by the cost to recruit patients for our two Phase III trials for SPN-810 as well as recruiting patients for our Phase IIb trial for SPN-812. The Phase IIb trialmanufacture registration/validation materials for SPN-812 was completed in 2016. We expect R&D costs to increase significantly in 2017support the NDA filing for SPN-812 and beyond, as we continue to advance both of these programs.

commercial sales if the NDA is approved.


Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    OurExpense
The table below provides information regarding our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $106.0for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):
       2019 vs 2018 Change 2018 vs 2017 Change
 2019 2018 2017 Dollar Percent Dollar Percent
Selling and marketing expense$113,609
 $121,645
 $104,072
 $(8,036) (7)% $17,573
 17%
General and administrative expense44,816
 38,243
 33,833
 6,573
 17% 4,410
 13%
Total$158,425
 $159,888
 $137,905
 $(1,463) (1)% $21,983
 16%
Selling and Marketing Expense
2019 Compared to 2018. Selling and marketing expenses decreased by $8.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016in 2019 as compared to $89.12018, primarily as a result of decreased professional and consulting expenses of $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015,and decreased sample expense of $3.1 million to support our existing commercial products.
General and Administrative Expense
2019 Compared to 2018. General and administrative (G&A) expenses increased by $6.6 million in 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to higher employee-related expenses of $3.6 million, including $2.3 million in share-based compensation, and an increase of $16.9$1.6 million or 19.0%in professional and consulting fees.

Other (Expense) Income
The following table provides the components of other (expense) income during the years indicated (dollars in thousands):
       Change
 2019 2018 2017 2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
Interest income$21,623
 $13,843
 $2,864
 $7,780
 $10,979
Interest expense(18,207) (13,840) (134) (4,367) (13,706)
Interest expense on nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties(4,500) (4,271) (1,434) (229) (2,837)
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities
 
 76
 
 (76)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 (295) 
 295
Total$(1,084) $(4,268) $1,077
 $3,184
 $(5,345)
Interest Income

2019 Compared to 2018. The year over year increase in SG&A expenses isinterest income, $7.8 million, was primarily due to support of our commercial products, and development of promotional materials and programsan increase in preparation for the launch of the migraine indication for Trokendi XR in 2017.

Interest Income and Other Income, net.    During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recognized $1.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

securities holdings. The increase in securities holdings primarily resulted from the net proceeds of the March 2018 0.625% 2023 Convertible Senior Note issuance (2023 Notes), with a principal amount of $402.5 million.

Interest Expense.Expense

2019 Compared to 2018. Interest expense was $0.5in 2019 increased by $4.4 million, during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $1.2 million for the2018, because of full year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease of $0.7 million was primarily due to a decrease in the principal amount of our outstanding 7.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes dueinterest expense recognized in 2019 (the Notes) from $8.5 million at December 31, 2015 to $4.6 million at December 31, 2016. Duringon the year ended December 31, 2016, a total of $3.9 million of2023 Notes and related accrued interest converted into 0.8 million shares of common stock.

issued in March 2018.

Interest Expense—Expense on Non-recourse Liability Related to Sale of Future Royalties.    Non-cashRoyalties

2019 Compared to 2018. Noncash interest expense related to our nonrecourse royalty liability was $4.5 millionremained generally unchanged, from 2018 to 2019.

Income Tax Expense
The following table provides information regarding our income tax expense during the year ended December 31, 2016 as comparedperiods indicated (dollar in thousands):
       Change
 2019 2018 2017 2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
Income tax expense$34,431
 $29,183
 $43,334
 $5,248
 $(14,151)
Effective tax rate23.3% 20.8% 43.1%    
2019 Compared to $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The increase of $1.0 million for this non-cashin income tax expense item was primarily due to a low effective tax rate in 2018 as the effective tax rate was favorably impacted by employee stock option exercises. The 2019 effective tax rate is favorably impacted by a decrease in our uncertain tax position reserve due to expiring statute of limitations and partially offset by an increase in our state effective tax rates due to an increase in the number of states in which we owe taxes.
Net Earnings
The following table provides information regarding our projection of future royalties relatedincome tax expense during the periods indicated (dollar in thousands):
       2019 vs 2018 Change 2018 vs 2017 Change
 2019 2018 2017 Dollar Percent Dollar Percent
Net earnings$113,056
 $110,993
 $57,284
 $2,063
 2% $53,709
 94%
2019 Compared to Orenitram.

Changes2018. The increase in Fair Value of Derivative Liability.    During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a non-cash gain of $0.4 million related to a change in the estimated fair value of the interest make-whole derivative liability related to our Notes. This gain is attributable to the passage of time and because our stock price remains above the $5.30 conversion price. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a non-cash gain of $0.2 million related to a change in estimated fair value of the interest make-whole derivative liability related to our Notes. This gainnet earnings was primarily due to the passage of time.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt.    During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million related to the conversion of $3.9 million of our Notes. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.3 million related to the conversion of $27.5 million of our Notes.

Income Tax.    During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $40.9 million of current tax benefit related primarily to releasing all of our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded $0.7 million of current tax expense related to an increase in our reserve for an uncertain tax position related to the Alternative Minimum Tax.

Net Income.    We realized net income of $91.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to net income of $13.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $77.3 million. This change was primarily due to the revenue generated from the sale of our two commercial products,products. Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, and Trokendi XR, increase inpartially offset by decreased R&D and SG&A spending and the impact of the elimination of the valuation allowance onincreased income tax expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our deferred tax asset.


Table of Contents

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
 
 
 Increase/
(decrease)
 
 
 2015 2014 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Revenues:

          

Net product sales

 $143,526 $89,571  53,955 

Royalty revenue

  3,038  633  2,405 

Licensing revenue

  901  2,474  (1,573)

Total revenues

  147,465  92,678    

Costs and expenses

          

Cost of product sales

  8,423  5,758  2,665 

Research and development

  29,135  19,586  9,549 

Selling, general and administrative

  89,063  72,612  16,451 

Total costs and expenses

  126,621  97,956    

Operating income (loss)

  20,844  (5,278)   

Other income (expense)

          

Interest income and other income, net

  681  387  294 

Interest expense

  (1,229) (4,963) 3,734 

Interest expense-nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  (3,541) (658) (2,883)

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities

  193  2,809  (2,616)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (2,338) (2,592) 254 

Total other expenses

  (6,234) (5,017)   

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  14,610  (10,295)   

Income tax expense

  666  630  36 

Net income (loss)

 $13,944 $(10,925)   

Net Product Sales.    Netoperations primarily with cash generated from product sales, are basedsupplemented by revenues from royalty and licensing arrangements as well as proceeds from the sale of equity and debt securities. Continued cash generation is highly dependent on gross revenue from shipments to distributors, less estimates for discounts, rebates, allowances, other sales deductions and returns. Our net product sales of $143.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 is comprised of $33.2 million of revenue from Oxtellar XR and $110.3 million of revenue from Trokendi XR. The increase in net product sales from 2014 to 2015 is primarily driven by increased prescriptions.

Our net product sales of $89.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 are comprised of $24.7 million of revenue from Oxtellar XR and $64.9 million of revenue from Trokendi XR.

Royalty Revenue.    Non-cash revenues of $3.0 million and $0.6 million were generated during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, pursuant to an agreement with HC Royalty.

Licensing Revenue.    Total licensing revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $0.9 million. There was $0.8 million in revenue generated from achievement of milestones in the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company recognized $2.5 million in licensing revenue in 2014. This consisted primarily of the United Therapeutics Corporation milestone payment of $2.0 million under the license agreement with the Company.

Cost of Product Sales.    Cost of product sales during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $8.4 million as compared to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $2.6 million or 44.8%. This increase was primarily due to sales increases.


Table of Contents

Research and Development Expense.    R&D expenses during the year ended December 31, 2015 were $29.1 million as compared to $19.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $9.5 million, or 48.5%. This increase was due to preclinical and clinical trials and manufacturing scale up activities for bothcommercial success of our product candidates, SPN-810 and SPN-812. During 2015, we initiated two Phase III trials for SPN-810 and a Phase IIb trial for SPN-812. We expect R&D costs to increase significantly in 2017 and beyond, as we continue to advance these trials and the related development activities for both of these programs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Our SG&A expenses were $89.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $72.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $16.5 million, or 22.7%. The increase in SG&A expenses is primarily due to the continued expansion of our sales and marketing efforts for bothcommercial products, Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR, including promotional material and grants. In addition, we expended effort in 2015 to prepare for the launch of the migraine indication for Trokendi XR in 2016.

Interest Income and Other Income, net.    During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities.

Interest Expense.    Interest expense was $1.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease of $3.8 million was primarily due to a decrease in the principal amount of our outstanding 7.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due in 2019 (the Notes) from $36.1 million at December 31, 2014 to $8.5 million at December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2015, $27.5 million of the Notes and related accrued interest converted into 5.7 million shares of common stock.

Interest Expense—Non-recourse Liability Related to Sale of Future Royalties.    Non-cash interest expense related to our royalty liability was $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase of $2.8 million for this non-cash expense item was primarily due to an increase in the expected royalties forecast related to Orenitram and the annualization impact as the agreement was entered into in July 2014.

Changes in Fair Value of Derivative Liability.    During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a non-cash gain of $0.2 million related to a change in estimated fair value of the interest make-whole derivative liability related to our Notes. This gain is attributable to the passage of time and because our stock price remains above the $5.30 conversion price. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized a non-cash gain of $2.8 million related to a change in estimated fair value of the interest make-whole derivative liability related to our Notes. This gain is primarily due to the passage of time.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt.    During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.3 million related to the conversion of $27.5 million of our Notes. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized a non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.6 million related to the conversion of $13.4 million of our Notes.

Income Tax.    During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded $0.7 million of current tax expense related primarily to an increase in our reserve for an uncertain tax position for the Alternative Minimum Tax. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded $0.6 million of current tax expense related primarily to the establishment of a reserve for an uncertain tax position for the Alternative Minimum Tax.

Net Income (Loss).XR.

We realized net income of $14.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to a net loss of $10.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $24.9 million. This change was primarily due to the revenue generated from our two commercial products, Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR, offset by increased expenses incurred in preparing for the late


Table of Contents

stage studies for two product candidates and an increase in marketing expenditures associated with ongoing support of Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe our increasing levels of net product sales will be sufficient to finance our operations in 2017 and subsequent years, including the increased R&D expenses for our clinical trials. We expect to incur significantly increased R&D expenses in 2017 and in subsequent years to support the development of SPN-810 and SPN-812, including the Phase III trials for SPN-810 and for SPN-812.

Our working capital at December 31, 2016 was $70.7 million, an increase of $21.7 million compared to our working capital of $49.0 million at December 31, 2015. In addition, our long term marketable securities at December 31, 2016 were $75.4 million, an increase of $20.4 million compared to our long term marketable securities of $55.0 million at December 31, 2015.

Our stockholders' equity increased by $103.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily as a result of net income, the issuance of shares related to the conversion of our Notes and share-based compensation.

In July 2014, we entered into a Royalty Interest Acquisition Agreement (the Agreement) with HC Royalty. Pursuant to the Agreement, HC Royalty paid us $30.0 million in consideration for acquiring certain royalty and milestone rights related to the commercialization of Orenitram (treprostinil) Extended-Release Tablets by United Therapeutics Corporation. Full ownership of the royalty rights will revert back to us if and when a certain threshold is reached per the terms of the Agreement.

In addition to income from operations, we historically financed our business through the sale of our debt and equity securities. Our two most recent financings occurred on May 3, 2013, when we issued $90.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes to qualified institutional buyers, the initial purchasers of the Notes (Initial Purchasers), and on July 2014 when we raised $30.0 million through a non-recourse liability related to the sale of future royalties.

As of December 31, 2016, holders of the Notes have converted a total of approximately $85.4 million of the Notes. Cumulatively, through December 31, 2016, we issued a total of approximately 16.1 million shares of common stock in conversion of the principal amount of the Notes and issued an additional 2.2 million shares of common stock and paid approximately $1.7 million cash in settlement of the interest make-whole provision related to the converted Notes.

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, holders of the Notes converted approximately $1.0 million of the Notes. We issued a total of approximately 0.2 million shares of common stock in conversion of the principal amount of the Notes and accrued interest thereon.

We believe our current working capital and long term marketable securities, along with increased revenues from increasing product sales, will be sufficient to finance the Company. We achieved positive cash flow positive and profitabilityprofitable from operations in each quarter of 2015 and 2016.2019. While we expect continued profitability in 2017 as we continue to increase sales, while also increasing spending to advance our clinical product candidates,for future years, we anticipate there may be significant variability from quarteryear to quarteryear in our levelprofitability, and particularly as we move forward with the anticipated commercial launch of profitability.

SPN-812 in 2020, assuming FDA approval.

We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash received from product sales will be sufficient to finance ongoing operations, development of our new products, and label expansions for existing products. To continue to grow our business over the long-term, we plan to commit substantial resources to: product development and clinical trials of product candidates; product acquisition; product in-licensing; and supportive functions such as compliance, finance, management of our intellectual property portfolio, information technology systems and personnel. In each case, spending would be commensurate with the growth of the business.

We may, from time to time, consider raising additional capital through: new collaborative arrangements; strategic alliances; additional equity and/or debt financings; or financing from other sources, especially in conjunction with opportunistic business development initiatives. We will continue to actively manage our capital structure and to consider all financing opportunities that could strengthen our long-term financial profile. Any such capital structure may or may not be similar to transactions in which we have engaged in the past. There can be no assurance that any such financing opportunities will be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

Table

Financial Condition
Cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, long term marketable securities, working capital, convertible notes and total stockholder’s equity as of Contents

the periods presented below are as follows (dollars in thousands):

       Change
 2019 2018 2017 2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
          
Cash and cash equivalents$181,381
 $192,248
 $100,304
 $(10,867) $91,944
Marketable securities165,692
 163,770
 39,736
 1,922
 124,034
Long term marketable securities591,773
 418,798
 133,638
 172,975
 285,160
Total$938,846
 $774,816
 $273,678
 $164,030
 $501,138
          
Working capital$312,057
 $332,134
 $105,451
 $(20,077) $226,683
          
Convertible notes, net (2023 Notes)$345,170
 $329,462
 $
 $15,708
 $329,462
          
Total stockholder's equity$595,428
 $453,023
 $267,480
 $142,405
 $185,543
2019 Compared to 2018
Total cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and long term marketable securities increased in 2019 as compared to 2018 by $164.0 million, primarily due to cash generated from operations in 2019.
Working capital decreased in 2019 as compared to 2018 by $20.1 million, primarily due to increased investment in long term marketable securities in 2019.
As of December 31, 2019, the outstanding principal on the 2023 Notes was $402.5 million. No 2023 Notes were converted as of December 31, 2019. Contemporaneous with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, the Company also entered into separate convertible note hedge transactions (collectively, the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions), issuing 402,500 convertible note hedge options. The Convertible Note Hedge Transactions are expected to reduce the potential dilution of the Company's common stock upon conversion of the 2023 Notes. Concurrently with entering into the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions, the Company also entered into separate warrant transactions, issuing a total of 6,783,939 warrants (the Warrant Transactions). See Note 9, Convertible Senior Notes Due 2023 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the 2023 Notes and our other indebtedness.
Stockholders’ equity increased in 2019 as compared to 2018 by $142.4 million, as a result of net earnings of $113.1 million, unrealized gains on marketable securities of $10.6 million, issuance of common stock of $3.9 million and share-based compensation of $14.8 million.

Summary of Cash Flows


The following table sets forthsummarizes the major sources and uses of cash for the periods set forth below summarized,(dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
 
 
 Increase/
(decrease)
 
 
 2016 2015 

Net cash provided by (used in):

          

Operating activities

 $66,812 $34,524  32,288 

Investing activities

  (35,964) (39,289) 3,325 

Financing activities

  2,052  1,867  185 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 $32,900 $(2,898)   
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Net cash provided by (used in):     
Operating activities     
Operating earnings$142,516
 $133,720
 $90,930
Working capital613
 (4,734) 23,710
Total operating activities143,129
 128,986
 114,640
      
Investing activities(157,924) (413,480) (86,415)
      
Financing activities3,928
 376,438
 5,681
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$(10,867) $91,944
 $33,906

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by/used inby operating activities is comprised of two components;components: cash provided by operating income/lossearnings; and cash provided by/used inby (used in) changes in working capital.

Results for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized below, in thousands:

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
  
 
 
 Increase/
(decrease)
 
 
 2016 2015 

Cash provided by operating income

 $58,364 $22,351  36,013 

Cash provided by working capital

  8,448  12,173  (3,725)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $66,812 $34,524    

The increase in net cash provided by operating activities, is$143.1 million, was primarily driven by increased revenue generated from the sale of Trokendi XR and Oxtellar XR. The decrease inoperating earnings, reduced by incremental cash providedabsorbed by changesincreased working capital.

Cash utilized in working capital is primarily driven by increased net sales deductions associated with our increased revenue.

reflects the timing impacts of cash collections on receivables and settlement of payables, as described below.

The changes in certain operating assets and liabilities are as follows (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 
 Year Ended December 31,  
 
 2016 2015 Explanation of Change

(Increase) in accounts receivable

 $(15,619)$(8,638)Increased sales.

(Increase) decrease in inventory

  (4,214) 854 Change in product inventory.

Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets

  2,306  (1,582)Progress of clinical trials and other receivables.

Increase in accounts payable, accrued sales deduction, and accrued expenses

  26,165  20,901 Increased expenses, primarily for clinical trial accruals and accrued net sales deductions.

Other

  (190) 638  

 $8,448 $12,173  
 Years Ended December 31,  
 2019 2018 2017 Explanation of Change
(Increase) Decrease in: 
  
   2019 Compared to 2018
Accounts receivable$15,751
 $(35,856) (24,059) Receivables decreased in 2019 because of channel inventory reduction in first quarter 2019.
Inventories(969) (9,355) 497
 Increased inventory to support increased product demand.
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other non-assets(2,864) (2,367) (3,566) Timing differences related to deposits for equipment purchases and prepaid expenses for new clinical trials costs.
Increase (Decrease) in:       
Accounts payable and accrued other noncurrent liabilities3,151
 6,854
 2,268
 Timing of vendor payments.
Accrued product returns and rebates566
 38,720
 26,400
 Timing of product rebate payments; impact of channel inventory reduction in first quarter 2019; increased provision due to greater utilization of patient co-pay program and higher per patient Medicaid rebates, managed care rebates, and patient co-pay payments.
Income taxes payable(9,934) (3,561) 15,931
 Increased current tax provision due to increased state taxes and higher taxable income.
Other(5,088) 831
 6,239
 Decreased employee-related costs.
Total$613
 $(4,734) 23,710
  


Investing Activities

We invest excess cash in accordance with our investment policy. Marketable securities consist of investments which mature in four years or less, including U.S. Treasury and various government agency debt securities, as well as investment grade securities in industrial and financial institutions.


Table of Contents

Fluctuations in investing activities between periods relate exclusively2019 Compared to the timing of marketable security purchases and the related maturities of these securities.

2018.Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $255.6 million, from $413.5 million in 2018 to $157.9 million in 2019, for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $36.0 million related to2019. This year over year change was driven by changes in the net purchase of marketable securities. In 2018, proceeds from the issuance of the 2023 Notes in March 2018 were used to purchase marketable securities of $15.6 million, deferred legal fees of $18.8 million and property and equipment purchases of $1.6 million. long term marketable securities.

Financing Activities
2019 Compared to 2018. Net cash used in investingprovided by financing activities decreased to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20152019 versus $376.4 million provided in the same period in 2018. This year over year decrease is primarily attributable to the issuance of $39.3 million consisted of deferred legal fees of $10.9 millionthe 2023 Notes in March 2018, coupled with the related convertible note hedges and property and equipment purchases of $2.1 million, and net purchase of marketable securities of $26.3 million.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $2.1 million, resulting from proceeds received from stock option exercises. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1.9 million, resulting from proceeds received from stock option exercises.

warrants.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2016 (except2019, except as noted below),below (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
Contractual Obligations
 Less than
1 Year
 1 - 3
Years
 3 - 5
Years
 Greater than
5 Years
 Total 

Convertible Senior Secured Notes

 $ $4,575 $ $ $4,575 

Interest on Convertible Notes

  343  486      829 

Operating leases(1)

  1,321  2,655  454    4,430 

Purchase obligations(2)

  46,060  799      46,859 

Total(3)

 $47,724 $8,515 $454 $ $56,693 

(1)
Our commitments for operating leases relate to our lease of office equipment, fleet vehicles and office and laboratory space as of December 31, 2016.

(2)
Relates primarily to agreements and purchase orders with contractors.

(3)
This table does not include (a) any milestone payments which may become payable to third parties under license agreements as the timing and likelihood of such payments are not known, (b) any royalty payments to third parties as the amounts, timing and likelihood of such payments are not known and (c) contracts that are entered into in the ordinary course of business which are not material in the aggregate in any period presented above.
Contractual Obligations FY2020 FY2021 - FY2022 FY2023 - FY2024 Thereafter Total
2023 Convertible Notes $
 $
 $402,500
 $
 $402,500
Interest on 2023 Convertible Notes(1)
 2,516
 5,031
 629
 
 8,176
Operating Leases(2)
 4,212
 7,727
 5,124
 26,784
 43,847
Purchase Obligations(3)
 215,240
 4,524
 25
 84
 219,873
Total(4)(5)
 $221,968
 $17,282
 $408,278
 $26,868
 $674,396

(1)
Relates to the 2023 Notes (see Note 9 in the Notes to consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.)
(2)
Our commitments for operating leases relate to our leases of office equipment, fleet vehicles and the lease of the current headquarters office and laboratory space, as of December 31, 2019.
(3)
Relates primarily to agreements and purchase orders with contractors and vendors.
(4)
This table does not include (i) any milestone payments which may become payable to third parties under license agreements or contractual agreements regarding our clinical trials or those which may become payable upon achieving sales and developmental milestones per contractual agreements, as the timing and likelihood of such payments are not known, (ii) any royalty payments to third parties as the amounts, timing and likelihood of such payments are not known, and (iii) contracts that are entered into in the ordinary course of business which are not material in the aggregate in any period presented above.
(5)
As of December 31, 2019, we had liabilities related to uncertain tax positions. Due to uncertainties in the timing of potential tax audits, the timing and the amounts associated with the resolution of these positions is uncertain. As such, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate regarding the timing of payments beyond 12 months. Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions are not included in the above table.
In addition to the table above, table, we are contractually obligated to pay to HC Royalty all royalty payments earned by us under a licensing agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation.for Orenitram. Although we have recorded a liability of $30.4$22.5 million atas of December 31, 20162019 related to this obligation, it is a non-recourse liability for which we have no obligation to make any cash payments to HC Royalty.Royalty, under any circumstances. Accordingly, this obligation will havehas no impact on our liquidity at any time and therefore thetime. The non-recourse liability has not been included in the table above.

We have obtained exclusive licenses from third parties for proprietary rights to support the product candidates in our psychiatry portfolio. We have two license agreements with Afecta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Afecta) pursuant to which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to selected product candidates, including an exclusive license to SPN-810. We may pay up to $300,000 upon the achievement of certain milestones. If a product candidate is successfully developed and commercialized, we will be obligated to pay royalties to Afecta based on worldwide net product sales at a rate in the low-single digits.


Table of Contents

We have also entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Rune HealthCare Limited (Rune), where we obtained the exclusive worldwide rights to a product concept from Rune. There are no future milestone payments owing to Rune under this agreement. If we receive approval to market and sell any products based on the Rune product concept for SPN-809, we will be obligated to pay royalties to Rune basedat a low single digit percentage rate on worldwide net sales in the low single digits.

product sales.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have, nor have we ever had, any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements, or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 in the notesNotes to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

ITEM 7A.     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve our capital to fund operations.operations and to facilitate business development activities. We also seek to maximize income from our investments without assuming significant risk.interest rate risk, liquidity risk or risk of default by investing in investment grade securities, with maturities of four years or less. Our exposure to market risk is confined to ourinvestments in cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and long term marketable securities. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and long term marketable securities of $165.5$938.8 million.
In connection with the 2023 Notes, we have separately entered into Convertible Note Hedge Transactions and Warrant Transactions to reduce the potential dilution of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 2023 Notes, and to partially offset the cost to purchase the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions, respectively.

Our cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash held at banks, certificates of deposit and money market funds, and have short-term maturities. Our marketable securities consist of investments in commercial paper, investment grade corporate and U.S. government agency and state debt securities, which are reported at fair value. We do not engage in any hedging activities against changes in interest rates.generally hold these securities to maturities of one to four years. Because of the short-term maturities ofrelatively short period that we hold our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and long term marketable securitiesinvestments and because we generally hold these securities to maturity, we do not believe that an increase in marketinterest rates would have any significant impact on the realizable value of our investments. We do not have any currency or other derivative financial instruments other than outstanding warrants to purchase common stock and the interest make-whole payment associated with our Notes.

convertible note hedges.

We may contract with CROs and investigational sites globally. Currently, we do not have on-going trialsonly one ongoing trial, for SPN-817, outside of the U.S. We do not hedge our foreign currency exchange rate risk. A hypothetical 10% appreciationTransactions denominated in Euro exchange rates againstcurrencies other than the U.S. dollar from prevailing marketare recorded based on exchange rates would have decreased our net income by approximately $4,000 forat the year ended time such transactions arise. As of December 31, 2016. Conversely, a hypothetical 10% depreciation2019 and December 31, 2018, substantially all of our liabilities were denominated in Euro exchange rates against the U.S. dollar from prevailing market rates would have increaseddollar.
Inflation generally affects us by increasing our net incomecost of labor and the cost of services provided by approximately $4,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.our vendors. We do not believe that inflation and changing prices over the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 had a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations.



Table of Contents

ITEM 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

Earnings

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

Earnings

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:


Opinion on the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiarysubsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations,earnings, comprehensive income (loss),earnings, changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-yearthree‑year period ended December 31, 2016. These2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)statements). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiarythe Company as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the years in the two-yearthree‑year period ended December 31, 2016,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 16, 2017February 28, 2020 expressed an adverseunqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principal
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This change was adopted using the modified retrospective method.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgment. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Evaluation of the Company’s accrued product returns
As disclosed in notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded an accrual of $18.8 million in accrued product returns in current liabilities as of December 31, 2019. The related provision for product returns is reflected as a reduction of gross products sales, and is recorded at the time of sale when the customer takes title to the product. Sale of the Company’s products are not subject to a general right of return; however, the Company will accept return of expired product six months prior to and up to 12 months subsequent to the product’s expiry date. The Company's products have a shelf life of up to 48 months from date of manufacture.

We identified the evaluation of accrued sales deductions related to product returns, and specifically the assessment of the expected long-term return rates, as a critical audit matter. The assessment of the expected long-term return rates involved a high degree of auditor judgment due to the significant passage of time between product sale and the time at which the Company issues credit on expired product. As a result, a high degree of auditor judgment was required to evaluate the expected long-term return rates as compared to actual returns experience.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s product returns accrual process to develop the expected long-term return rate assumptions used in estimating the accrued product returns. We assessed the Company’s long-term return rate assumptions by evaluating the consistency of those assumptions with the trend of actual historical return rates. We compared prior period expected long-term return rate assumptions against actual return rates experience.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.
Baltimore, Maryland
March 16, 2017

February 28, 2020

Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:


Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s and subsidiaries (the "Company")Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in theInternal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO 2013 Framework"). Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanyingManagement Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses related to inadequately trained resources with assigned responsibility and accountability over the design and operation of internal controls; an ineffective risk assessment process that assessed necessary changes in financial reporting and internal controls impacted by changes in information technology systems; ineffective operation of controls over the completeness and accuracy of key assumptions and data analyzed by a third party consultant and used to determine the returns portion of accrued sales deductions; and ineffective general information technology controls over the Microsoft Dynamics AX information technology system and the employee expense reimbursement system, that resulted in ineffective process-level automated and manual controls related to these IT systems, have been identified and included in management's assessment.



Table of Contents

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2016 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 16, 2017, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in the COSO 2013 Framework.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 16, 2017

February 28, 2020

Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at December 31, 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



McLean, Virginia
March 12, 2015, except for Note 2, as to which the date is January 20, 2017

Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share amounts)

 
 December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 

Assets

       

Current assets:

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $66,398 $33,498 

Marketable securities

  23,723  28,692 

Accounts receivable, net

  41,527  25,908 

Inventories, net

  16,801  12,587 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  2,955  5,261 

Total current assets

  151,404  105,946 

Long term marketable securities

  75,410  55,009 

Property and equipment, net

  4,344  3,874 

Deferred legal fees

  19,860  22,503 

Intangible assets, net

  16,490  976 

Other non-current assets

  331  318 

Deferred income taxes

  41,729   

Total assets

 $309,568 $188,626 

Liabilities and stockholders' equity

       

Current liabilities:

       

Accounts payable

 $8,055 $4,314 

Accrued sales deductions

  41,943  26,794 

Accrued expenses

  27,434  25,153 

Non-recourse liability related to sale of future royalties, current portion

  3,101  497 

Deferred licensing revenue

  209  176 

Total current liabilities

  80,742  56,934 

Deferred licensing revenue, net of current portion

  1,501  1,390 

Convertible notes, net

  4,165  7,085 

Non-recourse liability related to sale of future royalties, long term

  27,289  30,031 

Other non-current liabilities

  4,002  4,325 

Derivative liabilities

  114  854 

Total liabilities

  117,813  100,619 

Stockholders' equity:

  
 
  
 
 

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 130,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2016 and 2015; 49,971,267 and 49,004,674 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

  50  49 

Additional paid-in capital

  276,127  263,955 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (134) (488)

Accumulated deficit

  (84,288) (175,509)

Total stockholders' equity

  191,755  88,007 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $309,568 $188,626 
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Assets   
Current assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$181,381
 $192,248
Marketable securities165,692
 163,770
Accounts receivable, net87,332
 102,922
Inventories, net26,628
 25,659
Prepaid expenses and other current assets11,611
 8,888
Total current assets472,644
 493,487
Long term marketable securities591,773
 418,798
Property and equipment, net17,068
 4,095
Intangible assets, net24,840
 31,368
Lease assets21,279
 
Deferred income taxes32,063
 29,683
Other assets615
 380
    
Total assets1,160,282
 977,811
    
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity   
Current liabilities   
Accounts payable10,141
 3,195
Accrued product returns and rebates107,629
 107,063
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities37,130
 36,535
Income taxes payable2,443
 12,377
Nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties; current portion3,244
 2,183
Total current liabilities160,587
 161,353
Convertible notes, net345,170
 329,462
Nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties; long term19,248
 22,575
Lease liabilities, long term30,440
 
Other liabilities9,409
 11,398
Total liabilities564,854
 524,788
    
Stockholders’ equity   
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 130,000,000 shares authorized; 52,533,348 and 52,316,583 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively53
 52
Additional paid-in capital388,410
 369,637
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax7,417
 (3,158)
Retained earnings199,548
 86,492
Total stockholders’ equity595,428
 453,023
    
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity1,160,282
 977,811

See accompanying notes.


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Earnings

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Revenue

          

Net product sales

 $210,078 $143,526 $89,571 

Royalty revenue

  4,686  3,038  633 

Licensing revenue

  239  901  2,474 

Total revenue

  215,003  147,465  92,678 

Costs and expenses

          

Cost of product sales

  11,986  8,423  5,758 

Research and development

  42,791  29,135  19,586 

Selling, general and administrative

  106,010  89,063  72,612 

Total costs and expenses

  160,787  126,621  97,956 

Operating income (loss)

  54,216  20,844  (5,278)

Other income (expense)

          

Interest income

  1,482  643  348 

Interest expense

  (543) (1,229) (4,963)

Interest expense-nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  (4,548) (3,541) (658)

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities

  448  193  2,809 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (671) (2,338) (2,592)

Other (loss) income

  (15) 38  39 

Total other expense

  (3,847) (6,234) (5,017)

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  50,369  14,610  (10,295)

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (40,852) 666  630 

Net income (loss)

 $91,221 $13,944 $(10,925)

Basic

 $1.84 $0.29 $(0.26)

Diluted

 $1.76 $0.28 $(0.26)

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:

          

Basic

  49,472,434  47,485,258  42,260,896 

Diluted

  51,708,983  51,160,380  42,260,896 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Revenue     
Net product sales$383,400
 $399,871
 $294,097
Royalty revenue9,355
 8,276
 6,367
Licensing revenue
 750
 1,774
Total revenues392,755
 408,897
 302,238
      
Costs and expenses     
Cost of goods sold16,660
 15,356
 15,215
Research and development69,099
 89,209
 49,577
Selling, general and administrative158,425
 159,888
 137,905
      
Total costs and expenses244,184
 264,453
 202,697
      
Operating earnings148,571
 144,444
 99,541
      
Other (expense) income     
Interest expense(22,707) (18,111) (1,568)
Interest income, net21,623
 13,843
 2,645
Total other (expense) income(1,084) (4,268) 1,077
      
Earnings before income taxes147,487
 140,176
 100,618
      
Income tax expense34,431
 29,183
 43,334
Net earnings$113,056
 $110,993
 $57,284
      
Earnings per share     
Basic$2.16
 $2.13
 $1.13
Diluted$2.10
 $2.05
 $1.08
Weighted-average shares outstanding     
Basic52,412,181
 51,989,824
 50,756,603
Diluted53,816,754
 54,098,872
 53,301,150

See accompanying notes.


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Earnings

(in thousands)

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Net income (loss)

 $91,221 $13,944 $(10,925)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

          

Unrealized net gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax

  354  (334) (154)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

  354  (334) (154)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 $91,575 $13,610 $(11,079)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Net earnings$113,056
 $110,993
 57,284
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)     
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax10,575
 (2,411) (613)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)10,575
 (2,411) (613)
      
Comprehensive earnings$123,631
 $108,582
 $56,671
























See accompanying notes.


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(in thousands, except share data)

 
 Common Stock  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accumulated
Deficit
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 
 
 Shares Amount 

Balance, December 31, 2013

  39,983,437 $40 $211,952 $ $(178,528)$33,464 

Share-based compensation

      2,857      2,857 

Issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares

  76,333    516      516 

Exercise of stock options

  17,627    54      54 

Equity issued on conversion of convertible notes

  2,897,066  3  14,884      14,887 

Net loss

          (10,925) (10,925)

Other comprehensive loss

        (154)   (154)

Balance, December 31, 2014

  42,974,463  43  230,263  (154) (189,453) 40,699 

Share-based compensation

      4,090      4,090 

Issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares

  98,986    930      930 

Exercise of stock options

  205,640    937      937 

Equity issued on conversion of convertible notes

  5,693,062  6  27,083      27,089 

Exercise of warrants

  32,523    652        652 

Net income

          13,944  13,944 

Other comprehensive loss

        (334)   (334)

Balance, December 31, 2015

  49,004,674  49  263,955  (488) (175,509) 88,007 

Share-based compensation

      5,926      5,926 

Issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares

  109,244    1,494      1,494 

Exercise of stock options

  85,694    557      557 

Equity issued on conversion of convertible notes

  771,655  1  4,161      4,162 

Net income

          91,221  91,221 

Unrealized net gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax

        354    354 

Other

      34      34 

Balance, December 31, 2016

  49,971,267 $50 $276,127 $(134)$(84,288)$191,755 
 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Earnings (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 Shares Amount   
Balance, December 31, 201649,971,267
 $50
 $276,127
 $(134) $(84,288) $191,755
Cumulative-effect of adoption of ASU 2016-09
 
 211
 
 181
 392
Balance, January 1, 201749,971,267
 50
 276,338
 (134) (84,107) 192,147
Share-based compensation
 
 8,433
 
 
 8,433
Issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares71,256
 
 1,888
 
 
 1,888
Exercise of stock options407,477
 
 3,793
 
 
 3,793
Equity issued on conversion of convertible notes864,850
 1
 4,547
 
 
 4,548
Net earnings
 
 
 
 57,284
 57,284
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax
 
 
 (613) 
 (613)
Balance, December 31, 201751,314,850
 51
 294,999
 (747) (26,823) 267,480
Cumulative-effect of adoption of ASC 606
 
 
 
 2,322
 2,322
Balance, January 1, 201851,314,850
 51
 294,999
 (747) (24,501) 269,802
Share-based compensation
 
 11,291
 
 
 11,291
Issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares71,250
 
 2,209
 
 
 2,209
Exercise of stock options930,483
 1
 9,372
 
 
 9,373
Equity component of convertible notes, net of tax
 
 56,215
 
 
 56,215
Purchase of convertible note hedges, net of tax
 
 (70,137) 
 
 (70,137)
Issuance of warrants
 
 65,688
 
 
 65,688
Net earnings
 
 
 
 110,993
 110,993
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax
 
 
 (2,411) 
 (2,411)
Balance, December 31, 201852,316,583
 52
 369,637
 (3,158) 86,492
 453,023
Share-based compensation
 
 14,846
 
 
 14,846
Issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares102,012
 1
 2,447
 
 
 2,448
Exercise of stock options114,753
 
 1,480
 
 
 1,480
Net earnings
 
 
 
 113,056
 113,056
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax
 
 
 10,575
 
 10,575
Balance, December 31, 201952,533,348
 $53
 $388,410
 $7,417
 $199,548
 $595,428





See accompanying notes.


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Cash flows from operating activities

          

Net income (loss)

 $91,221 $13,944 $(10,925)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)

          

operating activities:

          

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  671  2,338  2,592 

Change in fair value of derivative liability

  (448) (193) (2,809)

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

      (154)

Depreciation and amortization

  2,399  921  928 

Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount

  520  748  2,090 

Noncash interest expense on nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  4,548  3,541  658 

Non-cash royalty revenue

  (4,686) (3,038) (633)

Share-based compensation expense

  5,926  4,090  2,857 

Deferred income tax benefit

  (41,787)    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

          

Accounts receivable

  (15,619) (8,638) (12,216)

Inventories

  (4,214) 854  (6,289)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  2,306  (1,582) (1,144)

Accounts payable

  3,470  2,061  (2,054)

Accrued sales deductions

  15,149  18,333  7,461 

Accrued expenses

  7,546  507  2,031 

Deferred product revenue, net

      (7,882)

Deferred licensing revenue

  144  149  (204)

Other non-current liabilities

  (334) 489  1,198 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  66,812  34,524  (24,495)

Cash flows from investing activities

          

Purchases of marketable securities

  (47,364) (63,859) (53,262)

Sales and maturities of marketable securities

  31,824  37,581  53,473 

Purchases of property and equipment

  (1,603) (2,104) (593)

Deferred legal fees

  (18,821) (10,907) (2,277)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (35,964) (39,289) (2,659)

Cash flows from financing activities

          

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  2,052  1,867  571 

Cash settlement of debt to equity conversion

      (1)

Proceeds from sale of future royalties

      30,000 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  2,052  1,867  30,570 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

  32,900  (2,898) 3,416 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  33,498  36,396  32,980 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $66,398 $33,498 $36,396 

Supplemental cash flow information:

          

Cash paid for interest

 $493 $825 $2,854 

Noncash financial activity:

          

Conversion of convertible notes and interest make-whole

 $4,162 $27,089 $14,887 

Exercise of warrants

 $ $652 $ 

Deferred legal fees included in accounts payable and accrued expenses

 $5,122 $9,789 $2,228 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities 
  
  
Net earnings$113,056
 $110,993
 $57,284
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 295
Change in fair value of derivative liability
 
 (76)
Depreciation and amortization6,659
 7,063
 8,132
Noncash operating lease cost3,566
 
 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount15,708
 11,848
 50
Amortization of premium/discount on marketable securities(4,335) (1,665) (563)
Noncash interest expense5,775
 4,271
 1,434
Noncash royalty revenue(6,927) (5,914) (5,283)
Share-based compensation expense14,846
 11,291
 8,433
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision(5,832) (4,167) 21,224
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable15,751
 (35,856) (24,059)
Inventories(969) (9,355) 497
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(2,723) (2,367) (3,566)
Other noncurrent assets(141) 
 
Accounts payable6,962
 (3,578) (620)
Accrued product returns and rebates566
 38,720
 26,400
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities(3,811) 10,432
 2,888
Income taxes payable(9,934) (3,561) 15,931
Deferred licensing revenue
 
 (274)
Other liabilities(5,088) 831
 6,513
Net cash provided by operating activities143,129
 128,986
 114,640
      
Cash flows from investing activities     
Purchases of marketable securities(409,707) (491,654) (101,889)
Sales and maturities of marketable securities253,170
 79,827
 28,657
Purchases of property and equipment(2,736) (844) (2,029)
Deferred legal fees1,349
 (809) (11,154)
Net cash used in investing activities(157,924) (413,480) (86,415)
      
Cash flows from financing activities     
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
 402,500
 
Convertible notes issuance financing costs
 (10,435) 
Proceeds from issuance of warrants
 65,688
 
Purchases of convertible note hedges
 (92,897) 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock3,928
 11,582
 5,681
Net cash provided by financing activities3,928
 376,438
 5,681
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(10,867) 91,944
 33,906
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year192,248
 100,304
 66,398
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$181,381
 $192,248
 $100,304
      
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest on convertible notes$2,516
 $1,342
 $134
Cash paid for Biscayne acquisition$
 $15,000
 $
Income taxes paid$51,540
 $34,772
 $1,588
      
Noncash investing and financing activity:     
Conversion of convertible notes and interest make-whole$
 $
 $4,548
Deferred legal fees and fixed assets included in accounts payable and accrued expenses$1,832
 $250
 $521
Unsettled purchase of marketable securities included in accrued expenses$
 $
 $1,004
Property and equipment additions from utilization of tenant improvement allowance$10,151
 $
 $

See accompanying notes.


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


1. Organization and Nature of Operations


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware on March 30, 2005, and commenced operations on December 22,in 2005. The Company is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, including neurological and psychiatric disorders.diseases. The Company markets two2 products: Oxtellar XR for the treatment of epilepsy products,and Trokendi XR for the prophylaxis of migraine headache and the treatment of epilepsy. The Company is also developing multiple proprietary CNS product candidates to address significant unmet medical needs and market opportunities.

The Company launched Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR for the treatment of epilepsy in 2013, followed by the launch of Trokendi XR for the prophylaxis of migraine headache in adolescents and has several proprietary product candidatesadults in clinical development that address the psychiatry market.

April 2017. The Company commenced the commercialization oflaunched Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XRwith an expanded indication to include monotherapy for partial seizures in 2013.

January 2019.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Supernus Europe Ltd., collectively referred to herein as "Supernus" or "the Company." All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.United States (U.S. GAAP).

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of: Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Supernus Europe Ltd.; Biscayne Neurotherapeutics, Inc. and Biscayne Neurotherapeutics Australia Pty Ltd. These are collectively referred to herein as “Supernus” or “the Company.” All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company, which is primarily located in the U.S.United States (U.S.), operates in one1 operating segment.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and judgments in certain circumstances that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, future royalty revenue related to Orenitram net product sales, accrued sales deductions, fair value of financial assets and liabilities, derivative liabilities, common stock options, income taxes, preclinical study and clinical trial accruals, and other contingencies. Management bases its estimates onon: historical experience or onexperience; various forecasts, includingforecasts; information received from its service providers which itand from other sources; and other assumptions that the Company believes to beare reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from thesethe Company’s estimates.

The Company evaluates the methodologies employed in making its estimates on an ongoing basis.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all investments in highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities consist of investments inin: U.S. Treasuries, certificateTreasury bills and notes; certificates of deposit,deposit; various U.S. governmental agency debt securities,securities; corporate bondsand municipal bonds; and other fixed income securities. The Company places all investments with government,governmental, industrial or financial institutions whose debt is rated as


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

investment grade.

The Company classifies all available-for-sale marketable securities with maturities greater than one year from the balance sheet date as non-current assets.

The Company's investments are furthermore classified as available-for-sale. Such securitiesavailable-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value.

Any unrealized holding gains or losses on debt securities are reported net of any tax effects reported, as accumulateda component of other comprehensive loss, which is a separate componentearnings (loss) in the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity.

comprehensive earnings. Realized gains and losses are included in interest income and declinesare determined using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.

Declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary, if any, are included in the consolidated resultsstatement of operations.earnings. A decline in the market value of any available for saleavailable-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in fair value, which iswith that reduction charged to earnings in that period, and aperiod. A new cost basis for the security is established. then established at the time the reduction is recognized.

77

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Dividend and interest income is recognized when earned. The cost ofPremiums and discounts on marketable securities sold is calculated using the specific identification method.

The Company established the Supernus Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for the sole purpose of receiving funds for executives from a previous SERPare amortized and providing a continuing deferral program under the Supernus SERP. As of December 31, 2016accreted, respectively, to maturity and 2015, the estimated fair value of the mutual fund investment securities within the SERP was approximately $275,000 and $263,000, respectively. The fair value of these assets is included within other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. A corresponding noncurrent liability is also includedin interest income in the consolidated balance sheets to reflect the Company's obligation for the SERP. The Company has not made, and has no plans to make, contributions to the SERP. The securities are restricted in nature and can only be used for purposesstatement of paying benefits under the SERP.

earnings.

Accounts Receivable, net

Net

Accounts receivable are reported on the consolidated balance sheets at outstanding amounts due from customers, less an allowance for doubtful accounts, sales discounts and discounts.sales allowances. The Company extends credit without requiring collateral.
The Company writes off uncollectible receivables when the likelihood of collection is remote. The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable on a regular basis. An allowance, when needed, is based upon various factors includingincluding: the financial condition and payment history of customers,customers; an overall review of collections experience on other accounts,accounts; and economic factors or events expected to affect future collections experience.

Payment terms for receivables are based on customary commercial terms and are predominantly less than one year.

The Company recorded an allowance for bad debts of approximately $42,000 as of December 31, 2016. No accounts were written off in 2015. The Company recorded an allowance of approximately $5.60, $0.1 million and $3.8 million0 for expected sales discounts as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The following table includes those customers, who are wholesalers and distributors,


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Yearsdoubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

that represent more than 10% of total net product sales2017, respectively. NaN receivable was written-off for 2016 and more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance on the consolidated balance sheet as ofyears ended December 31, 2016:

2019, 2018 and 2017.
 
 Percent of Net
Product Sales
 Percent of Accounts
Receivable, net
 

Customer A

  29% 43%

Customer B

  30% 26%

Customer C

  37% 28%

  96% 97%

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable and marketable securities.receivable. The counterparties are various corporations, governmental institutions, and financial institutions of high credit standing.

Substantially all of the Company's cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are maintained with well known,in U.S. government agencies,agency debt and debt of well-known, investment grade corporations. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of governmental insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, management believes theythese bear minimal default risk.

Inventory

The following table shows the percentage of the Company's sales made to and percentage of accounts receivables from wholesalers and distributors representing more than 10% of the Company's total net product sales and more than 10% of the Company's accounts receivables, net:
 Percentage to Net Product Sales Percentage to Accounts Receivable, net
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018
Customer A32% 33% 30% 45% 46%
Customer B32% 33% 30% 21% 24%
Customer C34% 32% 37% 30% 27%
 98% 98% 97% 96% 97%
Refer to Note 16 for concentration of net product sales.
Inventories
Inventories, which are recorded at the lower of cost or market,net realizable value, include materials, labor, and other direct costs and indirect costs and are valued using the first-in, first-out method. The Company writes down inventory that has become obsolete or has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value. Expired inventory is disposed of and the related costs are recognized as Cost of goods sold in the consolidated statement of earnings.

78

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Inventories Produced in Preparation for Product Launches
The Company capitalizes inventories produced in preparation for commercialproduct launches sufficient to support estimated initial market demand when future commercialization of a product is probable and future economic benefit is expected to be realized. The determination to capitalize is based on the particular facts and circumstances relating to the product. Capitalization of such inventory begins when the Company determines that (i) positive results have been obtained for the clinical trials that are necessary to support regulatory approval; (ii) uncertainties regarding regulatory approval have been significantly reduced; and (iii) it becomesis probable that these capitalized costs will provide some future economic benefit in excess of capitalized costs.
In evaluating whether these conditions are met, the Company considers the following: the product’s current status in the regulatory approval process; results from the related pivotal clinical trials; results from meetings with relevant regulatory agencies prior to the filing of regulatory applications; compilation of the regulatory application and consequent acceptance by the regulatory body; potential impediments to the approval process such as product candidates will receive regulatorysafety or efficacy concerns, potential labeling restrictions and other impediments: historical experience with manufacturing and commercializing similar products and the relevant product candidate; and the Company’s manufacturing environment including its supply chain in determining logistical constraints that could hamper approval or commercialization. In assessing the economic benefit that the Company is likely to realize, the Company considers the shelf life of the product in relation to the expected timeline for approval and patent related or contract issues that may prevent or delay commercialization and product stability data of all pre-approval production to date to determine whether there is adequate expected shelf life; viability of commercialization taking into account trends in the related costs will be recoverable through the commercial sale ofmarketplace and market acceptance; and anticipated future sales and anticipated reimbursement strategies that may prevail with respect to the product.

Property

In applying the lower of cost or net realizable value to pre-launch inventory, the Company estimates a range of likely commercial prices based on comparable commercial products and Equipment

Propertysales deductions.

The Company could be required to write down previously capitalized costs related to pre-launch inventories upon a change in such judgment, due to, among other potential factors, a denial or significant delay of approval by regulatory bodies, a delay in commercialization or other potential factors.
As of December 31, 2019 and equipment2018, there was 0 pre-launch inventory recognized on the consolidated balance sheets.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of patent defense costs, which are stated at cost. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the following average useful lives:

Computer equipment

3 years

Software

3 years

Lab equipment and furniture

5 - 10 years

Leasehold improvements

Shorter of lease term or useful life

Deferred Legal Fees

Legaldeferred legal fees that have been incurred in connection with legal proceedings related to the defense of patents for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR (see Notes 6 and 17). Amortization of the deferred legal fees will


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

begin upon successful outcome of the on-going litigation. Deferred legal fees will beXR. Patent defense costs are charged to expense in the event of an unsuccessful outcome of the on-going litigation.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist primarily of purchased patents and deferred legal fees related to patents. Patents

Patent defense costs are carried at cost less accumulated amortization, which is calculated on a straight-linestraight line basis over the estimated useful lives of the patents. Amortization commences in the quarter after the costs are incurred. The carrying valueamortization period is based initially upon the remaining patent life and is adjusted, if necessary, for any subsequent settlements or other changes to the expected useful life of the patents and deferred legal fees arepatent. Carrying value is assessed for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. There were no indicators of impairment identified at December 31, 2016 or 2015.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets consist primarily of purchased patents, deferred legal fees, and property and equipment.equipment and patent defense costs. The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If indications of impairment exist, projected future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the carrying amountvalue of the asset to determine whether the asset's value is recoverable. Evaluating for impairment requires judgment, including the estimation ofestimating future cash flows, future growth rates and profitability, and the expected life over which cash flows will occur. Changes in the Company's business strategy or adverse changes in market conditions could impactadversely affect impairment analyses, and require therequiring recognition of an impairment charge equal to the excess of the carrying value of the long-lived assetsasset over its estimated fair value.

Forvalue at the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company determinedtime at which that there was no impairmentdetermination is made.


79

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs consist of financing costswere incurred by the Company in connection with the closingissuance of the Company's 7.50%$402.5 million of 0.625% Convertible Senior Secured Notes and Secured Notes Payable offeringdue 2023 (2023 Notes), (see Note 8)9). The Company amortizes deferred financing costs over the term of the related debt, using the effective interest method.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when physical control of goods or provision of services are transferred to the Company’s customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The Company does not adjust revenue for any financing effects in transactions where the Company expects the period between the transfer of the goods or services and collection to be less than one year.
NaN contract assets or liabilities were recorded as of or December 31, 2019 or 2018.
Revenue from Product Sales
The Company’s customers, who are primarily pharmaceutical wholesalers and distributors, purchase product to fulfill orders from retail pharmacy chains and independent pharmacies of varying size and purchasing power. The Company recognizes gross revenue when its products are physically received by its customers, after shipment from a third party fulfillment center. Customers take control of the products, including title and ownership, upon physical receipt of the products at the customers' facilities.
Product sales are recorded net of various forms of variable consideration, including: estimated liability for rebates; estimated liability for future product returns; and estimated allowance for discounts. These are collectively considered "sales deductions."
As described below, variability in the net transaction price for the Company’s products arises primarily from the aforementioned sales deductions. Variable consideration is only recognized when it is probable that a significant reversal will not occur. Significant judgment is required in estimating certain sales deductions. In making these estimates, the Company considers: historical experience; product price increases; current contract prices under applicable payor programs; unbilled claims; processing time lags; and inventory levels in the distribution channel. The Company adjusts its estimates of revenue either when the most likely amount of consideration it expects to receive changes, or when the consideration becomes fixed.
If actual results in the future vary from the estimates, the Company adjusts these estimates. These adjustments could materially affect net product sales and earnings in the period that such adjustments are recorded.
Sales Deductions
The Company records product sales, net of the following sales deductions:
Rebates:  Rebates are discounts which the Company pays under either public sector or private sector health care programs. Public sector rebate programs encompass: various Medicaid drug rebate programs; Medicare coverage gap programs; and programs covering public health service institutions and government entities. All federal employees and agencies purchase drugs under the Federal Supply Schedule. Private sector rebate programs include: contractual agreements with managed care providers, under which the Company pays fees to gain access to that provider’s patient drug formulary; and Company sponsored programs, under which the Company defrays or eliminates patient co-payment charges that the patient would otherwise be obligated to pay to their managed care provider.
Rebates paid under public sector programs are generally mandated under law, whereas private sector rebates are generally contractually negotiated by the Company with managed care providers. Both types of rebates vary over time.

80

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Rebates are owed upon dispensing our product to a patient; i.e., filling a prescription. The accrual balance for rebates consists of the following three components. First, because rebates are generally invoiced and paid quarterly in arrears, the accrual balance consists of an estimate of the amount expected to be incurred for prescriptions dispensed in the current quarter. Second, the accrual balance also includes an estimate for known or estimated prior quarters’ unpaid rebates, to cover prescriptions dispensed in past quarters, but for which no invoice has yet been received. Third, the accrual balance includes an estimate for rebates that will be prospectively owed, for prescriptions filled in future quarters. This pertains to product that has been sold to wholesalers or distributors, and which resides either as wholesaler/distributor inventory, or as inventory held at pharmacies, but as of the end of the reporting period, has not been sold to a patient.
The Company’s estimates of expected rebate claims vary by program and by type of customer, because the period from the date at which the prescription is filled to the date at which the Company receives and pays the invoice varies substantially. For each of its products, the Company bases its estimates of expected rebate claims on multiple factors, including: historical levels of deductions; contractual terms with managed care providers; actual and anticipated changes in product price; prospective changes in managed care fee for service contracts; prospective changes in co-pay assistance programs; and anticipated changes in program utilization rates (i.e., patient participation rates under each specific program). The Company records an estimated liability for rebates at the time the customer takes title to the product (i.e., at the time of sale to wholesalers/distributors), and records this liability as a reduction to gross product sales, and an increase in Accrued product returns and rebates, in current liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets.
The sensitivity of the Company’s estimates varies by program and by type of customer. If actual rebates vary from estimated amounts, the Company will adjust the balances of such accrued rebates to reflect actual experience with respect to these programs. These adjustments could materially affect the estimated liability balance, net product sales and earnings in the period in which the adjustment is made.
Returns:   Sale of the Company’s products are not subject to a general right of return. Product that has been used to fill patient prescriptions is no longer subject to any right of return. However, the Company will accept return of product that is damaged or defective when shipped from its third party fulfillment center.
The Company will accept return of expired product six months prior to and up to 12 months subsequent to the product’s expiry date. Expired or defective returned product cannot be re-sold and is therefore destroyed.
The Company records an estimated liability for product returns at the time the customer takes title to the product (i.e., at time of sale) as a reduction to gross product sales, and an increase in Accrued product returns and rebates, in current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company estimates the liability for returns primarily based on the actual returns experience for its 2 commercial products.
Because the Company's products have a shelf life of up to 48 months from date of manufacture, and because the Company accepts return of product up to 12 months post expiry, there is a time lag of several years between the time at which the product is sold and the time when the Company issues credit on expired product. Because the Company’s returns policy generally permits product returns to be processed at current wholesaler price rather than historical acquisition price, the Company’s estimated liability for product returns is affected by price increases taken subsequent to the date of sale.
When extinguishing debt,the Company adjusts its estimates for product returns, the adjustment affects the estimated liability, product sales and earnings in the period of adjustment. Those adjustments may be material to our financial results.
Sales discounts:  Distributors and wholesalers of the Company's pharmaceutical products are generally offered various forms of consideration, including allowances, service fees and prompt payment discounts for distributing our products. Distributor and wholesaler allowances and service fees arise from contractual agreements, and are estimated as a percentage of the price at which the Company sells product to them. In addition, distributors and wholesalers are offered a prompt pay discount for payment within a specified period. The Company accounts for these discounts at the time of sale, as a reduction to gross product sales, and records these amounts as a valuation allowance against Accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets.

81

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Customer orders are generally fulfilled within a few days of receipt, resulting in minimal order backlog. There are no minimum product purchase requirements.
License Revenue
License and Collaboration Agreements
The Company has entered into collaboration agreements to commercialize both Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR outside of the U.S. Those agreements include the right to use the Company’s intellectual property as a functional license, and generally include an up-front license fee and ongoing milestone payments upon the achievement of certain specific events. These agreements may also require minimum royalty payments, based on sales of products which use the applicable intellectual property.
Up-front license fees are recognized once the license has been executed between the Company and its licensee.
Milestones are a form of variable consideration that are recognized when either the underlying events have transpired (i.e., event-based milestone) or when the sales-based targets have been met by the collaborative partner (i.e., sales-based milestone). Both types of milestone payments are nonrefundable. The Company evaluates whether achieving the milestone is considered probable, and estimates the amount of the milestone to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. The value of the associated milestone is not included in the transaction price if it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would occur. This estimation is based on management’s judgment, and may require assessing factors that are outside of the Company’s influence, such as: likelihood of regulatory success; availability of third party information; and expected time period until achievement of the event. These factors are evaluated based on the specific facts and circumstances.
Event-based milestones are recognized in the period that the related deferred financingevent, such as regulatory approval, occurs. Milestones that are not within the control of the Company, such as approval from regulatory authorities, or where attainment of the specified event is dependent on the success of a third-party, are not considered probable until the specified event occurs.
Sales-based milestones are recognized as revenue only when the sales-based target is achieved.
There are 0 guaranteed minimum amounts owed to the Company related to license and collaboration agreements.
Royalty Revenue
The Company recognizes noncash royalty revenue for amounts earned pursuant to our royalty agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation (United Therapeutics). This agreement includes the right to use the Company’s intellectual property as a functional license. In 2014, the Company sold certain of these royalty rights to Healthcare Royalty Partners III, L.P. (HC Royalty) (see Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies). Sales by United Therapeutics results in payments made by United Therapeutics to HC Royalty, in accordance with these agreements. As a result, the Company recorded a nonrecourse liability related to this transaction, and amortizes this amount as noncash royalty revenue. The Company records noncash royalty revenue based on estimated product sales by United Therapeutics (see Note 16). The Company also recognizes noncash interest expense related to this liability and accrues interest expense at an effective interest rate (see Note 10). The interest rate is determined based on projections of HC Royalty’s rate of return.
Royalty revenue also includes royalty amounts received from collaboration partners, including from Shire Plc (Shire, a subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd), based on net product sales in the current period of Shire’s product, Mydayis. Royalty revenue is only recognized when the underlying product sale by Shire occurs. The Shire arrangement also includes Shire's right to use the Company’s intellectual property as a functional license.
NaN guaranteed minimum amounts are owed to the Company related to any of these royalty revenue agreements.
Cost of Goods Sold
The cost of goods sold consists primarily of: materials; third-party manufacturing costs; freight and distribution costs; direct labor; and manufacturing overhead costs, including quality control and assurance.

82

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Research and Development Expenses and Related Accrued Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenditures are written off.

Preclinical Studyexpensed as incurred. These expenses include: salaries, benefits and Clinical Trial Accruals

share-based compensation; contract research and development services provided by third parties; costs for preclinical and clinical studies; cost of acquiring or manufacturing clinical trial material; regulatory costs; facilities costs; depreciation expense and other allocated expenses; and license fees and milestone payments related to in-licensed products and technologies. Assets acquired that are used for research and development and that have no future alternative use are expensed as in-process research and development.

The Company estimates preclinical study and clinical trial expenses based on the services performed pursuant to contracts with research institutions, clinical investigators, and clinical research organizations (CROs) and other service providers that conduct these activitiesperform services on ourthe Company’s behalf. In recording service fees, the Company estimates the timecost of those services which have been performed on behalf of the Company during the current period, over which the related services will be performed and compares the level of effort expended through the end of each period tothose costs with the cumulative expenses recorded and payments made for such services. As appropriate, itthe Company accrues additional service fees, or defers any non-refundablenonrefundable advance payments, until the related services are performed. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, the Company will adjustadjusts its accrualaccrued expenses, or its deferred advance


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

payment payments, accordingly. If the Company latersubsequently determines that it no longer expects the services associated with a nonrefundable advance payment to be rendered, the remaining portion of that advance payment will beis charged to expense in the period thatin which such determination is made.

Revenue from Product Sales

Revenue from product sales

Share-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense over the service period using the straight-line method. Employee share-based compensation is recognized when persuasive evidencemeasured based on estimated fair value as of an arrangement exists; deliverythe grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model in calculating the fair value of option grants as of the grant date. The Company uses the following assumptions for estimating fair value of option grants:
Fair Value of Common Stock—The fair value of the common stock underlying the option grants is determined based on observable market prices of the Company’s common stock.
Expected Volatility—Volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s share price has occurred and titlehistorically fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate (i.e., expected volatility) during a period. Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, the Company began using the historical volatility of its common stock to measure expected volatility. Prior to the productfirst quarter of 2019, volatility was estimated using the observed volatility of the common stock of several public entities of similar size, complexity, and associated riskstage of loss has passed to the customer; the price is fixed or determinable; collection from the customer has been reasonably assured; all performance obligations have been met; and returns and allowances can be reasonably estimated. Product sales are recorded net of estimated rebates, chargebacks, allowances, discounts, co-pay assistance and other deductionsdevelopment, as well as estimated product returns (collectively, "sales deductions").

Our products are distributed through wholesalerstaking into consideration the Company’s actual volatility since the Company’s IPO in 2012.

Dividend Yield—The Company has never declared or paid dividends, and pharmaceutical distributors. Each of these wholesalers and distributors will take title and ownershiphas no plans to do so in the product upon physical receipt of the product and then distribute our products to pharmacies.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a $2.9 million reduction to net revenue related to a change in estimate associated with its accrued sales deductions of $26.8 million at December 31, 2015. The change in estimate reflects returns experience associated with our initial launch shipments, which have now passed their expiry dating.

Sales Deductions

Allowances for estimated sales deductions are provided for the following:

    Rebates. Rebates include mandated discounts under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, the Medicare coverage gap program, as well as negotiated discounts with commercial healthcare providers. Rebates are amounts owed after the final dispensing of products to a benefit plan participant and are based upon contractual agreements or legal requirements with the public sector (e.g. Medicaid) and with private sector benefit providers. The allowance for rebatesforeseeable future.
Expected Term—This is based on statutory and contractual discount rates and expected claimed rebates paid based on a plan provider's utilization. Rebates are generally invoiced and paid quarterly in arrears so that the accrual balance consists of an estimate of the amount expected to be incurred for the current quarter's activity, plus an accrual balance for known or estimated prior quarters' unpaid rebates. If actual future rebates vary from estimates, we may need to adjust prior period accruals, which would affect revenue in the period of adjustment.

Co-pay assistance. Patients who paytime during which options are expected to remain unexercised. Options have a maximum contractual term of ten years. Beginning in cash or have commercial insurancethe first quarter of 2019, the Company began estimating the average expected life of stock options using its historical experience. Prior to the first quarter of 2019, the Company determined the average expected life of stock options according to the “simplified method”, as described in Staff Accounting Bulletin 110, which is the mid-point between the vesting date and meet certain eligibility requirements may receive co-pay assistance from the Company. The intentend of this programthe contractual term.
Risk-Free Interest Rate—This is to reduce the patient's outobserved U.S. Treasury Note rate as of pocket costs. Liabilitiesthe week each option grant is issued, with a term that most closely resembles the expected term of the option.
Expected Forfeiture Rate—Forfeitures are accounted for co-pay assistance are based on actual program participation and estimates of program redemption using data provided by third-party administrators.

Distributor/Wholesaler deductions and discounts. U.S. specialty distributors and wholesalers are offered various forms of consideration including allowances, service fees and prompt payment discounts as consideration for distributing our products. Distributor allowances and service fees
they occur.


83

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

      arise from contractual agreements with distributors and are generally a percentage


Self-Insurance Liabilities
As of the purchase price paid by the distributors and wholesalers. Wholesale customers are offered a prompt pay discount for payment within a specified period.

Returns. Sales of our products are not subject to a general right of return; however,January 1, 2019, the Company will accept product thatself-insures its employee medical insurance liability. The self-insurance liability is damaged or defective when shipped directly from our warehouseundiscounted and expired product six months prior to, and up to twelve months subsequent to, its expiry date. Product that has been used to fill patient prescriptions is no longer subject to any right of return.

Chargebacks. Chargebacks are discounts that occur when contracted customers purchase directly from an intermediary distributor or wholesaler. Contracted customers, which currently consist primarily of Public Health Service institutions and federal government entities purchasing via the Federal Supply Schedule, generally purchase the product at a discounted price. The distributor or wholesaler, in turn, charges back the difference between the price initially paid by the distributor or wholesaler and the discounted price paid to the distributor or wholesaler by the customer. The allowance for distributor/wholesaler chargebacksdetermined actuarially, is based on known salesclaims filed, historical and industry claims experience, and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet paid. The Company has established stop-loss amounts that limit the Company’s further exposure after any individual claim reaches the designated stop-loss threshold, which effectively transfers any additional liability to contracted customers.

Revenue Recognitiona third party. The stop-loss limit for self-insured employee medical claims is $150,000 per employee per year.

The Company recorded a self-insurance liability of License Revenue

Licenseapproximately $600,000 as of December 31, 2019 in Accrued expenses and Collaboration Agreements

other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Leases
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (New Lease Standard) using the modified retrospective transition approach. We applied the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. Results and disclosure requirements for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented consistent with Topic 842, while prior period amounts have entered into collaboration agreements to have both Oxtellar XRnot been adjusted and Trokendi XR commercialized outside of the U.S. These agreements generally include an up-front license fee and ongoing milestone payments upon the achievement of specific events. We believe that when milestones meet all of the necessary criteriacontinue to be considered substantive, these should be recognized as revenue when achieved. For up-front license fees, we have estimatedreported in accordance with our historical accounting under Topic 840.
The Company elected the service periodpackage of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which, among other things, allowed the Company to carryforward the historical lease classification, the assessment on whether a contract was or contains a lease, and are recognizing this payment as revenuethe initial direct costs for any leases that existed prior to January 1, 2019. The Company also elected to combine the lease and non-lease components, and to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet. We recognize the associated lease payments in the consolidated statements of earnings on a straight-line basis over the respective service period.

Milestone Payments

Milestone payments on licensing agreementslease term. Additionally, for certain equipment leases, we apply a portfolio approach to effectively account for the operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities.

The adoption of the New Lease Standard resulted in the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities as of January 1, 2019 of approximately $4.0 million. The adoption did not impact the beginning retained earnings, or the prior year consolidated statements of earnings and statements of cash flows (see Note 14, Leases).
Under Topic 842, the Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized as revenue whenat commencement date based on the collaborative partner acknowledges completionpresent value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this purpose, the Company considers only payments that are fixed and determinable at the time of commencement. The Company calculates the present value of future payments by using an estimated incremental borrowing rate which approximates the rate at which the Company would borrow, on a secured basis and over a similar term. This rate is estimated based on information available at commencement date of the milestonelease, and substantive effort was necessarymay differ for individual leases or for portfolios of leased assets.
Some of the Company’s leases include options to achieveterminate prior to the milestone. Management may recognize revenue contingent uponend of the achievement of a milestone in its entiretylease term, or to extend the lease for one or more years. These options are included in the period in whichlease term when it is reasonably certain that the milestone is achieved only ifoption will be exercised. When determining the milestone meets allprobability of exercising such options, the criteria to be considered substantive. Substantive milestone paymentsCompany considers contract-based, asset-based, entity-based, and market-based factors.
The Company’s lease agreements may contain variable costs such as common area maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes or other costs. Variable lease costs are recognized upon achievement of the milestone only if all of the following conditions are met:

    the milestone payments are non-refundable;

    achievement of the milestone involves a degree of risk and was not reasonably assured at the inception of the arrangement;

    substantive effortexpensed as incurred on the partner's partconsolidated statements of earnings. The Company’s lease agreements generally do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet.
Operating leases are included in Lease assets, Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and Lease liabilities, long term on the consolidated balance sheets. Lease expense for operating leases is involved in achieving the milestone; and

the amount of the milestone payment is reasonable in relation to the effort expended or the risk associated with achievement of the milestone.
recognized as an operating cost.


84

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Determination


Advertising Expense
Advertising expense includes costs of promotional materials and activities, such as to whether a payment meets the aforementioned conditions involves management's judgment. If any of these conditions are not met, the resulting payment would not be considered a substantive milestone,marketing materials, marketing programs and therefore the resulting payment would be considered part of the consideration for the single unit of accounting and amortized over the appropriate period.

There was no milestone revenue during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded $0.8 million and $2.0 million, during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Royalty Revenue

We recognize non-cash royalty revenue for royalty amounts earned pursuant to a royalty agreement with United Therapeutics. In 2014, the Company sold certain of these royalty rights to HC Royalty (see Note 15). Accordingly, the Company records non-cash royalty revenue when payments are made from United Therapeutics to HC Royalty in connection with these agreements.

Cost of Product Sales

The cost of product sales consist primarily of materials, third-party manufacturing costs, freight and distribution costs, allocation of labor, quality control and assurance, and other manufacturing overhead costs.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs primarily consist of employee-related expenses, including salaries and benefits; share-based compensation expense; expenses incurred under agreements with CROs, payments to investigators, and consultants that conduct the Company's clinical trials; the cost of acquiring and manufacturing clinical trial materials; the cost of manufacturing materials used in process validation, to the extent that those materials are manufactured prior to receiving regulatory approval for those products and are not expected to be sold commercially; facilities costs that do not have an alternative future use; related depreciation and other allocated expenses; license fees for, and milestone payments related to, in-licensed products and technologies; and costs associated with animal testing activities and regulatory approvals.

Advertising Expense

speaker programs. The costs of the Company's advertising efforts are expensed as incurred.

The Company incurred approximately $21.9$40.8 million, $19.3$43.3 million and $14.8$33.8 million in advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,2019, 2018 and 2014, respectively, which2017, respectively. These expenses are recorded in the selling,Selling, general and administrative expense line of the Statement of Operations.

Share-Based Compensation

Employee share-based compensation is measured based on the estimated fair value on the grant date. The grant date fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of subjective assumptions including volatility, expected term, risk-free rate, and the fair value of the


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

underlying common stock. The Company recognizes expense using the straight-line method less estimated forfeitures.

The Company records the expense for stock option grants to non-employees based on the estimated fair value of the stock option using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of non-employee awards is re-measured at each reporting period. As a result, stock compensation expense for non-employee awards with vesting is affected by subsequent changesexpenses in the fair valueconsolidated statement of the Company's common stock.

earnings.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax reporting bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. When appropriate, valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in its consolidated financial statements when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions must initially and subsequently be measuredestimated as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority,authorities, assuming full knowledge of the position and relevant facts. The Company's policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to income taxes inas income tax expense.

expense in the relevant period.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2016,

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
On January 1, 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issuedCompany adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-15, "Classification2014-9, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," and has subsequently issued a number of Certain Cash Receiptsamendments to ASU 2014-9. ASU 2014-9 and Cash Payments."all the related amendments are codified in ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (the New Revenue Standard). The standard eliminates diversityNew Revenue Standard provides a comprehensive model to be used in practice in how certain cash receiptsthe accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and cash paymentssupersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance.
The Company adopted the new guidance using the New Revenue Standard using the modified retrospective method and applied this method to those contracts which had not been completed as of January 1, 2018. While results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under the new guidance, prior period amounts were not adjusted and classifiedcontinue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the statementprior periods. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the New Revenue Standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.
The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue standard was as follows:
 
December 31, 2018
As Reported
 Adjustments January 1, 2018
Accounts receivable, net$65,586
 $1,620
 $67,206
Deferred licensing revenue287
 (287) 
Deferred licensing revenue, net of current portion1,149
 (1,149) 
Deferred income taxes (asset)20,843
 (734) 20,109
Accumulated deficit26,823
 (2,322) 24,501

The Company recorded a decrease of $2.3 million to the accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adopting the New Revenue Standard. The adoption of the New Revenue Standard resulted to the acceleration of both up-front licensing fees from license and collaboration agreements and the acceleration of royalties from sales of licensed product. Under the New Revenue Standard, up-front licensing fees are recognized when the license is delivered to the customer. Royalties from the sale of licensed product will be recognized as the underlying sales of product occur by the licensee. There were no changes in

85

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

the timing of revenue recognition related to net product sales. Adoption of the New Revenue Standard had no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Topic 842, as amended, which supersedes the lease accounting guidance under Topic 840, which generally requires lessees to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding ROU assets on the balance sheet, and to provide enhanced disclosures surrounding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017.arising from leasing arrangements. The Company doesadopted the new guidance using the modified retrospective transition approach by applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application and not expectrestating comparative periods. The most significant impact was the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases. For information regarding the impact of the New Lease Standard adoption, see Significant Accounting Policies - Leases above and Note 14 - Leases.
The adoption of the New Lease Standard resulted in the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities for operating leases as of January 1, 2019 of approximately $4.0 million. Financial reporting for periods on or after January 1, 2019 are presented under the new guidance. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with previous guidance. The standard did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated net earnings and had no impact on cash flows (see Note 14, Leases).
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) - The new standard, issued in July 2016, requires credit losses on financial assets to be measured as the net amount expected to be collected, rather than based on incurred losses. Further, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses, limited to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosure of credit risk associated with respective assets. The Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2020, and expects the adoption of this guidance towill not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016,consolidated financial statements.


ASU 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract - The new standard, issued in August 2018, aligns the FASB issuedrequirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or to obtain internal-use software. This includes hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. This ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvementsalso requires the implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting." The standard is intended to simplify several areasbe expensed over the term of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted.hosting arrangement, which includes reasonably certain renewals. The Company does not expect thatwill adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2020, and expects the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on Consolidated Financial Statementsits consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-18, Clarifying the Interaction Between Topic 808 and related disclosures.

In February 2016,Topic 606 - The new standard, issued in November 2018, clarifies when transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement are within the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)."scope of the FASB’s revenue standard, Topic 606. The Company will adopt the new standard requires a lessee to recognize assetseffective January 1, 2020, and liabilities onexpects the balance sheet for leases with lease terms greater than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. We expect the ASU to have a material


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

impact on our assets and liabilities due to the addition of previously classified operating leases, but we dowill not expect it to have a material impact on our cash flows or resultsits consolidated financial statements.


ASU 2018-13, Changes to Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820) - The new standard, issued in August 2018, improved the effectiveness of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes."disclosure requirements for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The standard requires that deferred tax assetsremoves, modifies, and liabilities be classified as noncurrent onadds certain disclosure requirements. The Company will adopt the balance sheet rather than being separated into currentnew standard effective January 1, 2020, and noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted and the standard may be applied either retrospectively or on a prospective basis to all deferred tax assets and liabilities. We early adopted ASU 2015-17 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015 on a prospective basis. As of December 31, 2015, the impact ofexpects the adoption of this standard was immaterial.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory." Under this new guidance, entities that measure inventory using any method other than last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method will be required to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The amendments in this ASU, which should be applied prospectively, are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

In April 2015,its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the FASBAccounting for Income Taxes - The new standard, issued ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifyingin December 2019, simplifies the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." This ASU more closely aligns the treatment of debt issuance costs with debt discounts and premiums and requires debt issuance costs to be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt. The amendments in this ASU are effectiveaccounting for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.income taxes. This guidance has been appliedwill be effective on January 1, 2021 on a retrospective basis. As of December 31, 2015,prospective basis, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of thisnew guidance on its consolidated financial statements and will adopt the new standard was immaterial.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction-and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principles-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption being permitted for periods ending after December 15, 2016. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are in the process of evaluating the potential revenue implications of the standard change, which may result in changes to our revenue recognition practices around license and collaboration agreements.

January 1, 2021.

The Company has evaluated all other ASUs issued through the date of the consolidated financialsfinancial statements were issued in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and believes that no other ASU will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

86

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

(Continued)


The fair value of an asset or liability should representrepresents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Such transactions to sell an asset or transfer a liability are assumed to occur in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Accordingly, fair value is determined based on a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than from a reporting entity's perspective.

The Company reports assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value using a three level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that theassets. The Company has the ability to access atthese prices as of the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (interest rates, yield curves, etc.) and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company's own assumptions, based on the best information available, including the Company's own data.

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following tables show the fair value of the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value, in thousands:

 
 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 
 
 Total Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2015
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

 $66,398 $66,398 $ $ 

Marketable securities

  23,723  656  23,067   

Long term marketable securities

  75,410    75,410   

Marketable securities—restricted (SERP)

  275    275   

Total assets at fair value

 $165,806 $67,054 $98,752 $ 

Liabilities:

             

Derivative liabilities

 $114 $ $ $114 

Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)


 
 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 
 
 Total Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2015
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

 $33,498 $33,498 $ $ 

Marketable securities

  28,692  654  28,038   

Long term marketable securities

  55,009    55,009   

Marketable securities—restricted (SERP)

  263    263   

Total assets at fair value

 $117,462 $34,152 $83,310 $ 

Liabilities:

             

Derivative liabilities

 $854 $ $ $854 

The fair value of the restricted marketable securities is included within other non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company's Level 1 assets include cash held with banks, certificate of deposits, and money market funds.

Level 2 assets include the SERP (Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan) assets, commercial paper and investment grade corporate bonds and other fixed income securities. Level 2 securities are valued using third-party pricing sources that apply applicable inputs and other relevant data intoin their models to estimate fair value.

Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates; yield curves); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or by other means (i.e., market corroborated inputs).

Level 3 liabilities include3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the estimatedCompany’s own assumptions. These are based on the best information available, including the Company’s own data.
Financial Assets
The Company’s financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value of the interest make-whole liability associated with the Company's 7.50% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2019 (the Notes), which is recordedon a recurring basis are as a derivative liability.

The fair value of the interest make-whole liability of the Notes was calculated using a binomial-lattice model with the following key assumptions as of December 31 2016:

follows (dollars in thousands):

Volatility

45%

Stock Price as of December 31, 2016

$25.25 per share

Credit Spread

900 bps

Term

4 months

Dividend Yield

0.0%
   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31,
2019
 Total Fair
value at
December 31, 2019
 Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents     
 Cash$78,912
 $78,912
 $
 Money market funds102,469
 102,469
 
Marketable securities     
Corporate debt securities165,527
 
 165,527
Municipal debt securities165
 
 165
Long term marketable securities     
Corporate debt securities571,828
 254
 571,574
U.S. government agency debt securities19,945
 
 19,945
Other noncurrent assets     
Marketable securities - restricted (SERP)418
 3
 415
Total assets at fair value$939,264
 $181,638
 $757,626

Changes in the fair value of the warrants and the interest make-whole liability are recognized as a component of Other Income (Expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table presents information about the Company's Level 3 liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and



87

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

December 31, 2016 that are included in the Non-Current Liabilities section


   Fair Value Measurements as of December 31,
2018
 Total Fair Value at
December 31, 2018
 Quoted Prices
in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets: 
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents     
Cash$106,918
 $106,918
 $
Money market funds85,330
 85,330
 
Marketable securities     
Corporate debt securities163,770
 245
 163,525
Long term marketable securities     
Corporate debt securities415,650
 445
 415,205
U.S. government agency debt securities2,983
 
 2,983
Municipal debt securities165
 
 165
Other noncurrent assets     
Marketable securities - restricted (SERP)326
 1
 325
Total assets at fair value$775,142
 $192,939
 $582,203

Level 1 assets include: cash held at banks; certificates of the Consolidated Balance Sheets, in thousands:

deposit; money market funds; and investment grade corporate debt securities.
 
 Year Ended
December 31,
2015 and 2016
 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 $6,564 

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities included in earnings

  (193)

Reduction due to conversion of debt to equity

  (4,865)

Cashless exercise of common stock warrants

  (652)

Balance at December 31, 2015

  854 

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities included in earnings

  (448)

Reduction due to conversion of debt to equity

  (292)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 $114 

The carrying value, face valueLevel 2 assets include: commercial paper; investment grade corporate, U.S. government agency, state and estimatedmunicipal debt securities; other fixed income securities and SERP (Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan) assets. The fair value of the Notes was approximately $4.2 million, $4.6 million and $21.8 million, respectively,restricted marketable securities is recorded in Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

There were 0 level 3 assets as of December 31, 2016. The fair value was estimated based on actual trade information as well as quoted prices provided by bond traders, which would be characterized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. This fair value amount gives recognition to the value of the interest make-whole liability and the value of the conversion option. These items have been accounted for as derivative liabilities and additional paid-in-capital, respectively.

2019 or 2018.

The carrying amounts of other financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.


Unrestricted available-for-sale marketable securities held by the Company wereare as follows (dollars in thousands:

At December 31, 2016:

thousands):
 December 31,
2019
 December 31, 2018
    
Corporate and U.S. government agency and municipal debt securities   
Amortized cost$747,598
 $586,726
Gross unrealized gains10,031
 55
Gross unrealized losses(164) (4,213)
Total fair value$757,465
 $582,568

Available for Sale
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 

Corporate debt securities

 $99,487  86  (440)$99,133 

At December 31, 2015:


88

Available for Sale
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 

Corporate debt securities

 $84,189  5  (493)$83,701 

Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014


3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)


The contractual maturities of the unrestricted available for saleavailable-for-sale marketable securities held by the Company wereare as follows (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 December 31,
2019
Less Than 1 Year$165,692
1 year to 2 years188,378
2 year to 3 years201,491
3 years to 4 years201,904
Greater Than 4 Years
Total$757,465

 
 December 31,
2016
 

Less Than 1 Year

 $23,723 

1 year to 2 years

  24,318 

3 years to 4 years

  51,092 

Greater Than 4 Years

   

Total

 $99,133 

The Company has not experienced any other-than-temporary losses on its marketable securities and restricted marketable securities.

Financial Liabilities
The cost of securities soldfollowing table sets forth the Company’s financial liabilities that are not carried at fair value (dollars in thousands):
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
      
 Carrying Value Fair Value (Level 2) Carrying Value Fair Value (Level 2)
2023 Notes$345,170
 $366,023
 $329,462
 $375,834

The fair value is calculated using the specific identification method.

estimated based on actual trade information, as well as quoted prices provided by bond traders.

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Raw materials$4,582
 $5,742
Work in process11,428
 7,275
Finished goods10,618
 12,642
 $26,628
 $25,659

 
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 

Raw materials

 $2,091 $2,887 

Work in process

  8,874  3,946 

Finished goods

  5,836  5,754 

 $16,801 $12,587 

5. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Lab equipment and furniture$11,053
 $8,995
Leasehold improvements14,217
 2,731
Software2,225
 2,181
Computer equipment1,839
 1,313
Construction-in-progress433
 94
 29,767
 15,314
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(12,699) (11,219)
Total$17,068
 $4,095


89

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 

Computer equipment

 $1,206 $1,112 

Software

  1,807  307 

Lab equipment and furniture

  6,758  5,667 

Leasehold improvements

  2,642  2,642 

Construction in progress

  28  1,114 

  12,441  10,842 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (8,097) (6,968)

 $4,344 $3,874 

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was approximately $1.1$1.5 million, $0.7$1.9 million, and $0.7$1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


TableThe Company annually performs an impairment assessment of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years endedits property and equipment in the fourth quarter of each year, or earlier if impairment indicators exist. As of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

2019, there were no identified indicators of impairment.

6. Deferred Legal Fees and Intangible Assets

Deferred

Intangible assets consist of patent defense costs, which are deferred legal fees have been incurred in connectionconjunction with patent litigationdefending patents for Oxtellar XR and Trokendi XR. AsThe Company amortizes these costs over the useful life of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had deferred legal fees of $19.9 million and $22.5 million, respectively.

respective patents.

The following sets forth the gross carrying amount and related accumulated amortization of thesethe intangible assets (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 
Weighted-
Average Life
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Capitalized patent defense costs3.01 - 7.25 years $43,375
 $44,724
Less accumulated amortization  (18,535) (13,356)
Total  $24,840
 $31,368

 
 Weighted-Average
Life
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 

Capitalized patent defense costs

 9.5 - 11 years $17,773 $994 

Less accumulated amortization

    (1,283) (18)

   $16,490 $976 

The Company prevailed in a lawsuit related to

U.S. patents covering Oxtellar XR in 2016, at which timeand Trokendi XR will expire no earlier than 2027. As regards Trokendi XR, the Company reduced deferred legal fees,entered into settlement agreements that allow third parties to enter the market by $16.6 million, and transferred these amounts to intangible assets. The Company subsequently began amortizing the costs associated with that litigation.

The net book value of intangible assets was $16.5 million as of December 31, 2016 and was $1.0 million as of December 31, 2015. The increase in intangible assets reflects the successful outcome of the lawsuit related to Oxtellar XR in February 2016. There is an offsetting reduction in the amount carried as deferred legal fees, as described above.

January 1, 2023, or earlier under certain circumstances.

Amortization expense on intangible assets was approximately $1.3$5.2 million, $0.2$5.2 million and $0.2$6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. Amortization expense in 2015 and 2014 included
Anticipated annual amortization expense associated with purchased patents that were fully amortized asfor intangible assets from 2020 to 2022 is estimated at $5.0 million per year. Anticipated annual amortization expense for intangible assets in 2023 and 2024 is estimated at $2.3 million per year.
The Company annually performs an impairment assessment of its intangible assets in the fourth quarter of each year, or earlier, if impairment indicators exist. As of December 31, 2015 and are therefore not included in the above table.

There2019, there were no identified indicators of impairment identified at December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

impairment.

7. Accrued Expenses

and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses are comprisedand other current liabilities consist of the following (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
    
Accrued clinical trial costs (1)
$13,285
 $14,034
Accrued compensation11,223
 13,546
Accrued professional fees3,936
 3,706
Lease liabilities, current2,825
 
Other accrued expenses5,861
 5,249
Total$37,130
 $36,535

(1)Includes preclinical and all clinical trial-related costs.




90

 
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 

Accrued compensation

 $9,145 $7,519 

Accrued professional fees

  5,919  10,057 

Accrued clinical trial and clinical supply costs

  4,350  3,677 

Accrued product costs

  1,035  113 

Accrued sales and marketing expenses

  528  434 

Accrued interest expense

  61  295 

Other accrued expenses

  6,396  3,058 

 $27,434 $25,153 

Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015


8. Accrued Product Returns and 2014

8.Rebates

Accrued product returns and rebates consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Accrued rebates$88,811
 $85,003
Accrued product returns18,818
 22,060
Total$107,629
 $107,063

9. Convertible Senior Secured Notes

Due 2023

On May 3, 2013,March 14, 2018, the Company issued $90.0entered into a Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Cowen and Company, LLC, as the initial purchasers (collectively, the Initial Purchasers), in connection with the offering and sale of $350 million aggregate principal amount of Notes in a private placement offering.

2023 Notes. The Company also granted the Initial Purchasers an over-allotment option to purchase, within a 30-day period, up to an additional $52.5 million principal amount of 2023 Notes, on the same terms and conditions which the Initial Purchasers exercised in full on March 15, 2018. The total principal amount of 2023 Notes was $402.5 million.

On March 19, 2018, the sale of the 2023 Notes was settled, and the 2023 Notes were issued the Notes underpursuant to an Indenture, dated May 3, 2013as of March 19, 2018 (the Indenture), between the Company and U.S. BankWilmington Trust, National Association, as Trusteetrustee. The Indenture includes customary terms and Collateral Agent.covenants, including certain events of default upon which the 2023 Notes may be due and payable immediately. The Indenture governing the 2023 Notes provide for 7.50% interest per annumdoes not contain any financial or operating covenants or any restrictions on the principal amountpayment of dividends, the issuance of other indebtedness, or the issuance or repurchase of securities by the Company.
Interest on the 2023 Notes is at an annual rate of 0.625%, payable semi-annually in arrears, on MayApril 1 and NovemberOctober 1 of each year.year, beginning on October 1, 2018. The 2023 Notes will mature on MayApril 1, 2019,2023, unless earlier converted redeemed or repurchased by the Company. The
Noteholders may convert their 2023 Notes are convertible intoat their option only in the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter, if the last reported sale price per share of the Company's common stock (Common Stock) as described below.

The Notes are the Company's senior secured obligations and (i) rank senior in right of payment to any of the indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes; (ii) rank effectively senior to any of the unsecured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the collateral securing the Notes; (iii) rank equal in right of payment with all of the Company's indebtedness that is not subordinated to the Notes; and (iv) are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and liabilities, including trade payables, of the Company's existing and future subsidiaries.

The Notes are secured by a first-priority lien, other than customary permitted liens, on substantially all of the Company's and its domestic subsidiaries' assets, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, including license agreements, general intangibles, accounts, instruments, investment property, intellectual property and any proceeds of the foregoing pursuant to that certain Security and Pledge Agreement, dated May 3, 2013 (the Security Agreement), between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent. The Indenture restricts the ability of the Company and its existing and future subsidiaries to make investments, including transfers of the Company's assets that constitute collateral securing the Notes, in its existing and future foreign subsidiaries.

Prior to November 1, 2018, a holder of Notes may convert all or a portion of its Notes, in principal amounts equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof, only if one or more of the following conditions has been satisfied: (1) if, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the 30 consecutive trading day perioddays ending within five trading days prior to a conversion date,on, and including the last reported sale pricetrading day of the Company's Common Stockimmediately preceding calendar quarter, exceeds 130% of the conversion price, or a price of approximately $77.13 per share on each such trading day; (2) during the five5 consecutive business day perioddays immediately followingafter any five10 consecutive trading day period (the Measurement Period),(such 10 consecutive trading day period, the "measurement period") in which for each trading day of that Measurement Period, the trading price (as defined in the Indenture) per $1,000 principal amount of Notes for sucheach trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price per share of the Company's Common Stockcommon stock on such trading day and the applicable conversion rate on such trading day; (3) upon the occurrence of certain corporate events or distributions on the Company's common stock, as specified corporate transactions; orin the Indenture; and (4) if the Company calls the Notes for redemption, at any time prior tofrom and including October 1, 2022, until the close of business on the businesssecond scheduled trading day immediately preceding the redemption date. On and after November 1, 2018, a holder of Notes may convert all or a portion of its Notes, in principal amounts equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof, at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately precedingbefore the maturity date of the Notes, regardless of the foregoing circumstances.date. The Company will settle conversion of the Notes through paymentconversions by paying or delivery,delivering, as the case may be ofapplicable, cash, shares of Common Stockthe Company's common stock, or a combination thereof,of cash and shares of the Company's common stock, at its election.

election, based on the applicable conversion rate. The initial conversion rate for the Notes is equal to 188.705916.8545 shares of Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (which is equivalent tothe 2023 Notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $5.30$59.33 per share, of


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

8. Convertible Senior Secured Notes (Continued)

Common Stock). The conversion rate is subject to adjustment uponas specified in the occurrence of certain specified events but will not be adjusted for accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, upon the occurrence ofIndenture.

If a "make-whole fundamental change" (as, as defined in the Indenture), the Company will, in certain circumstances, increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares for a holder that elects to convert its notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change as described in the Indenture.

Effective November 1, 2013, if, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending within five trading days prior to a conversion date, the last reported sale price of the Company's common stock exceeds the conversion price on each such trading day, the Company became required, in certain circumstances, to make an interest make-whole payment to converting holders equal to the sum of the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of interest that would have been made on the Notes to be converted had such notes remained outstanding until May 1, 2017 computed using a discount rate equal to 2%. The Company may pay an interest make-whole payment either in cash or in Common Stock, at its election. If the Company elects to pay an interest make-whole payment in Common Stock,Indenture occurs, then the stock will be valued at 95% of the simple average of the daily volume- weighted average price (VWAP) per share for the 10 trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the conversion date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares the Company may deliver in connection with an interest make-whole payment and repayment of principal will not exceed 221.7294 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, subject to adjustment. If, pursuant to its election to deliver Common Stock in connection with the payment of the interest make-whole amount, the Company would be required to deliver a number of shares of Common Stock in excess of such threshold, the Company would deliver cash in lieu of shares otherwise deliverable upon conversions in excess thereof (based on the simple average of the daily VWAP for the 10 trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the conversion date).

Upon (i) the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture) or (ii) if the Company calls the Notes for redemption as described below (either event, a "make-whole fundamental change") and a holder elects to convert its Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change, the Company will, in certain circumstances, increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares (the "Additional Shares") as described below. The Company will notify holders within one business day after the first public announcement by it or a third party of an event or transaction that the Company reasonably determines would, if consummated, constitute a make-whole fundamental change. Upon receiving notice or otherwise becoming aware of a potential make-whole fundamental change described, the Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to announce or cause the announcement of such potential make-whole fundamental change in time to deliver such notice at least 50 scheduled trading days prior to the anticipated effective date for such transaction. The Company will notify the Trustee and holders of the effective date of any make-whole fundamental change no later than one business day after such effective date.

The number of additional shares by which the Company will increase the conversion rate will be determined based on the date on which the make-whole fundamental change occurs or becomes effective (the Effective Date) and the price (the Stock Price) paid (or deemed paid) per share of the Company's Common Stock in the fundamental change. If the holders of the Company's common stock


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

8. Convertible Senior Secured Notes (Continued)

receive only cash in a make-whole fundamental change (i) the Stock Price shall be the cash amount paid per share and (ii) the Company will satisfy its conversion obligation to a holder that converts its Notes any time after such make-whole fundamental change by delivering to such holder, on the third business day immediately following the relevant conversion date, an amount of cash, for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes converted, equal to the product of (x) the conversion rate in effect on the relevant conversion date (as increased by the Additional Shares, if any) and (y) the Stock Price. Otherwise, (i) the Stock Price will equal the average of the last reported sale prices of the Company's Common Stock over the five trading day period ending on, and including, the trading day immediately preceding the Effective Date of the make-whole fundamental change and (ii) the Company will satisfy its conversion obligation to a holder that converts its Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change based on the conversion rate as increased by the number of Additional Shares. In connection with a make-whole fundamental change triggered by redemption of the Notes, the Effective Date of such make-whole fundamental change will be the date on which the Company delivers notice of the redemption. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event will the conversion rate exceed the maximum conversion rate, which is 221.7294 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which amount is inclusive of repayment of the principal of the Notes.

If a fundamental change occurs at any time, holders will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to purchase for cash any or all of the Notes, or any portion of the principal amount thereof, that is equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof, on a date of the Company's choosing that is not less than 20 calendar days nor more than 35 calendar days after the date on which it delivers a fundamental change notice. The price the Company is required to pay for a Note is equal to 100% of the principal amount of such Note plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change purchase date. Any Notes purchased by the Company will be paid for in cash.

The Company may not redeem the Notes prior to May 1, 2017. On or after May 1, 2017, the Company may redeem for cash all, but not less than all, of the Notes if the last reported sale price of the Company's Common Stock equals or exceeds 140% of the applicable conversion price, or $7.42 per share, for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the trading day immediately prior to the date the Company delivers written notice of the redemption. The redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. If the Company calls the Notes for redemption, a make-whole fundamental change will be deemed to occur and the Company will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate for holders who convert their notes in connections with such make-whole fundamental changea specified period of time. If a "fundamental change", as describeddefined in the Indenture.

Indenture occurs, then noteholders may require the Company to repurchase their 2023 Notes at a cash repurchase price equal to the principal amount of the 2023 Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

The Company incurred approximately $3.5 millionmay not redeem the 2023 Notes at its option before maturity.
In the event of financing costs (includingconversion, if converted in cash, holders would forgo all future interest payments, any unpaid accrued interest and the underwriters' fee) in connection withpossibility of further stock price appreciation. Upon the issuancereceipt of conversion requests, the settlement of the Notes. Approximately $0.9 million of this amount was allocated2023 Notes will be paid pursuant to additional paid-in capital and the remaining $2.6 million is recorded as a deferred cost being amortized over the termterms of the Notes. AsIndenture. In the event that all of December 31, 2016, approximately $30,000 remained unamortized.

the 2023 Notes are converted, the Company would be required to repay the $402.5 million in principal value and any conversion premium in cash, shares, or any combination of cash and shares of its common stock (at the Company's option).


91

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015



The 2023 Notes are the Company's senior, unsecured obligations and 2014

8. Convertible Senior Securedwill be equal in right of payment with the Company's future senior, unsecured indebtedness. The 2023 Notes (Continued)

The table below summarizes activity relatedare senior in right of payment to the Company's future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the 2023 Notes. The 2023 Notes from issuance on May 3, 2013 through December 31, 2016, in thousands:

Gross proceeds

 $90,000 

Initial value of interest make-whole derivative reported as debt discount

  (9,270)

Conversion option reported as debt discount and APIC

  (22,336)

Conversion of debt to equity—principal

  (81,463)

Conversion of debt to equity—accretion of debt discount and deferred financing costs

  25,003 

Accretion of debt discount and deferred financing costs

  5,151 

December 31, 2015 carrying value

  7,085 

Conversion of debt to equity—principal

  
(3,962

)

Conversion of debt to equity—accretion of debt discount and deferred financing costs

  764 

Accretion of debt discount and deferred financing costs

  278 

December 31, 2016 carrying value

 $4,165 

Duringare effectively subordinated to the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately $3.9 millionCompany's future secured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing that indebtedness, and will be structurally subordinated to all future indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables.

Convertible Notes were presentedHedge and Warrant Transactions
Contemporaneously with the pricing of the 2023 Notes on March 14, 2018, and in connection with the exercise of the over-allotment option by the Initial Purchasers on March 15, 2018, the Company entered into separate privately negotiated convertible note hedge transactions (collectively, the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions) with each of the call spread counterparties. The Convertible Note Hedge Transactions cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the 2023 Notes, the number of shares of the Company's common stock underlying the 2023 Notes, as described above. The Company issued 402,500 convertible note hedge options, including options purchased on the exercise of the overallotment option. In the event that shares or cash are deliverable to holders of the 2023 Notes upon conversion at limits defined in the Indenture, counterparties to the convertible note hedges will be required to deliver up to approximately 6.8 million shares of the Company's common stock, or to pay cash to the Company for conversion. Accordingly,in an amount approximately equivalent to the value that the Company issued approximately 0.7 milliondelivers to the holders of the 2023 Notes, based on a conversion price of $59.33 per share. The total cost of the convertible note hedge transactions was $92.9 million.
Concurrently with entering into the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions on each such date, the Company also entered into separate privately negotiated warrant transactions (collectively, the Warrant Transactions) with each of the call spread counterparties, whereby the Company sold to the call spread counterparties warrants to purchase, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, up to the same number of shares of the Company's common stock.
The Convertible Note Hedge Transactions and the Warrant Transactions are separate contracts entered into by the Company with the Call Spread Counterparties, and are not part of the terms of the 2023 Notes. These contracts will not affect the noteholders' rights under the 2023 Notes. Holders of the 2023 Notes will not have any rights with respect to the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions or the Warrant Transactions. The Company issued a total of 6,783,939 warrants. The warrants entitle the holder to 1 share per warrant at an initial strike price of $80.9063 per share of the Company's common stock (subject to adjustment). The Company received proceeds of approximately $65.7 million from the sale of these warrants.
The Convertible Note Hedge Transactions are expected to reduce the potential dilution with respect to the Company's common stock, upon conversion of the 2023 Notes, and/or offset any potential cash payments the Company is required to make in conversionexcess of the principal amount of converted 2023 Notes, as the Notes.case may be. The Company issued an additional 24,000 shares of common stock in settlement ofWarrant Transactions were entered into to partially offset the interest make-whole provision related to the converted Notes. As a result of the conversions, the Company incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $0.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately $27.5 million of the Notes were presentedcost to the Company of the purchased Convertible Note Hedge Transactions; however, the Warrant Transactions could have a dilutive effect with respect to the Company's common stock to the extent that the market price per share of the Company's common stock, as measured under the terms of the Warrant Transactions, exceeds the strike price of the warrants.

As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria under ASC 815-40-25, the convertible note hedges and warrants are recorded in stockholders' equity and are not accounted for conversion. Accordingly,as derivatives. The net cost incurred in connection with the convertible note hedges and warrant transactions was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.
In accordance with accounting guidance on embedded conversion features, the Company issued approximately 5.2valued and bifurcated the conversion option associated with the 2023 Notes from the respective host debt instrument, which is referred to as debt discount. The Company initially recorded the conversion option of $76.4 million sharesin additional paid-in capital. The resulting debt discount of common stock in conversion$76.4 million on the 2023 Notes is being amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate of 5.41% over the contractual term of the principal2023 Notes.
The Company incurred approximately $10.4 million of debt financing costs. Approximately $2.0 million of this amount is allocated to the additional paid-in capital. The remainder, $8.4 million, is recorded as deferred costs and is being amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the 2023 Notes.

92

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


The long term debt consists of the following (dollars in thousands):
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
2023 Notes$402,500
 $402,500
Unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs(57,330) (73,038)
Total carrying value$345,170
 $329,462

NaN 2023 Notes were converted as of December 31, 2019.
10.    Other (Expense) Income
Other (expense) income consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
    
Interest income$21,623
 $13,843
 $2,864
Interest expense(18,207) (13,840) (134)
Interest expense on nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties(4,500) (4,271) (1,434)
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities
 
 76
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 (295)
Total$(1,084) $(4,268) $1,077


Interest expense includes noncash interest expense related to amortization of deferred financing costs, and amortization of the debt discount on the 2023 Notes, in the amount of $15.7 million and $11.8 million for the Notes. The Company issued an additional 0.5 million shares of common stock in settlement of the interest make-whole provision related to the converted Notes. As a result of the conversions, the Company incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.3 million during the yearyears ended December 31, 2015.

9. 2019, and 2018, respectively (see Note 9).

11. Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock

The holders of our Common Stockthe Company's common stock are entitled to one1 vote for each share of Common Stock held. On May 1, 2012, the Company completed its IPO, in which 10 million shares of the Company's Common Stock were sold at a price of $5 per share. Additionally, the underwriters of the Company's IPO exercised the full amount of their over-allotment option resulting in the sale of an additional 449,250 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price of $5 per share, resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of $52.3 million. The Company realized net proceeds of $47.6 million from the IPO, after issuance costs of approximately $4.7 million.

On December 5, 2012, the Company completed a follow-on offering, in which 6 million shares of the Company's Common Stock were sold at a price of $8 per share. Additionally, the underwriters of the


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

9. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Company's follow-on offering exercised their over-allotment options in January 2013 resulting in the sale of an additional 239,432 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price of $8 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds to the Company of $49.9 million. The Company realized net proceeds of $46.6 million from the follow-on offering, after issuance costs of approximately $3.3 million.

During the period from November 1, 2013 through December 31, 2016, the Company issued 16,120,128 shares of common stock as a result of the conversion of approximately $85.4 million of Convertible Notes and approximately 2,219,908 shares of common stock in settlement of the interest-make whole provision associated with those conversions.

10. Share-Based Payments

held.

Stock Option Plans

Plan

The Company has adopted the Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the 2012 Plan), which is stockholder approved, andapproved. This plan provides for the grant of stock options and certain other equity awards, includingincluding: stock appreciation rights (SAR),(SARs); restricted and unrestricted stock; stock stock units,units; performance awards,awards; cash awardsawards; and other awards that are convertible into or otherwise based on the Company's common stock, to the Company's key employees, directors, and consultants and advisors. The 2012 Plan is administered by the Company's Board of Directors and the Company's Compensation Committee of the Board, and provides for the issuance of up to 8,000,0008 million shares of the Company's Common Stock.common stock. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair valueclosing price of the Company's Common Stock atcommon stock as of the grant date; those optiondate. Option awards granted to employees, consultants and advisors generally vest in four4 equivalent annual installments, starting on the first anniversary of the date of grant andthe grant. Awards have ten-yearten year contractual terms. Option awards granted to the directors generally vest over a one year term, and have a ten year contractual term. Share-based compensation recognized related

93

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

11. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has adopted the grant of employee and non-employee stock options, SAR,Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (ESPP) awardsas amended (the ESPP). The ESPP allows eligible employees the opportunity to acquire shares of the Company's common stock at periodic intervals through accumulated payroll deductions. These deductions are applied at the semi-annual purchase dates of June 30 and non-vestedDecember 31, to purchase shares of common stock wasat a discount. Eligible employees may purchase shares at the lower of 85% of the fair market value at either the first day of the purchase period or the fair market value at the end of the purchase period. The ESPP provides for issuance of up to 700,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company records compensation expense related to its ESPP.
Share-based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense is as follows (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Research and development$2,599
 $1,943
 $1,387
Selling, general and administrative12,247
 9,348
 7,046
Total$14,846
 $11,291
 $8,433

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Research and development

 $1,107 $874 $728 

Selling, general and administrative

  4,819  3,216  2,129 

Total

 $5,926 $4,090 $2,857 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of the grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the assumptions in the following table:

 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Fair value of common stock$22.99 - $37.78 $37.20 - $58.15 $25.30 - $41.00
Expected volatility61.36% - 63.28% 57.95% - 60.56% 53.61% - 60.60%
Dividend yield0% 0% 0%
Expected term5.53 years - 6.18 years 6.25 years 6.25 years
Risk-free interest rate1.69% - 2.55% 2.69% - 2.85% 1.90% - 2.18%
Expected forfeiture rate0% 0% 0%

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, total unrecognized compensation expense was approximately $26.3 million and $22.4 million, respectively. The Company expects to prospectively recognize these expenses over a weighted-average period of 2.52 years and 2.65 years, respectively.

94

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 2016 2015 2014

Fair value of common stock

 $12.98 - $22.80 $9.13 - $21.21 $7.63 - $10.02

Expected volatility

 60.9% - 64.5% 60.9% - 64.6% 64.5% - 68.3%

Dividend Yield

 0% 0% 0%

Expected term

 6.25 years 6.25 years 6.25 years

Risk-free interest rate

 1.14% - 2.15% 1.54% - 1.74% 1.67% - 1.97%

Expected forfeiture rate

 5% 5% 5%

Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

10. Share-Based Payments


11. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Fair Value of Common Stock—For option grants that occurred after the Company's IPO on May 1, 2012, the fair value of the Common Stock underlying the option grants was determined based on observable market prices of the Company's Common Stock.

Expected Volatility—Volatility is a measure of the amount by which a financial variable such as a share price has fluctuated (historical volatility) or is expected to fluctuate (expected volatility) during a period. The Company has identified several public entities of similar size, complexity, and stage of development. Accordingly, historical volatility has been calculated using the volatility of these companies, as well as taking into consideration the Company's actual volatility since our IPO. As our historical experience is not sufficient to calculate volatility for our option grants, the Company will continue to use guideline peer group volatility information until the historical volatility of its own Common Stock is sufficient on its own to measure expected volatility for future option grants.

Dividend Yield—The Company has never declared or paid dividends and has no plans to do so in the foreseeable future.

Expected Term—This is the period of time that the options granted are expected to remain unexercised. Options granted have a maximum term of ten years. The Company determines the average expected life of stock options according to the "simplified method" as described in Staff Accounting Bulletin 110, which is the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term. Over time, management will track estimates of the expected life of the option term so that estimates will approximate actual behavior for similar options.

Risk-Free Interest Rate—This is the U.S. Treasury note rate for the week of each option grant during the year, having a term that most closely resembles the expected term of the option.

Expected Forfeiture Rate—The forfeiture rate is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or canceled on an annual basis before becoming fully vested.



Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

10. Share-Based Payments (Continued)

The following table summarizes stock option and SAR activity:

 
Number of
Options
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding , December 31, 20174,280,670
 $14.50
 7.37 $108,520
Granted762,915
 $39.91
    
Exercised(930,483) $10.07
   $36,317
Forfeited(196,139) $25.01
    
Outstanding, December 31, 20183,916,963
 $19.98
 7.10 $57,220
Granted880,235
 $36.43
    
Exercised(114,753) $12.90
   $2,423
Forfeited(75,886) $34.80
    
Outstanding, December 31, 20194,606,559
 $23.05
 6.66 $27,716
As of December 31, 2019       
Vested and expected to vest4,606,559
 $23.05
 6.66 $27,716
Exercisable2,598,112
 $15.68
 5.48 $25,594

 
 Number of
Options
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 

Outstanding, December 31, 2014

  2,080,749 $7.93  8.04 

Granted

  971,500 $10.12    

Exercised

  (205,640)$4.56    

Forfeited

  (147,602)$8.60    

Outstanding, December 31, 2015

  2,699,007 $8.94  7.92 

Granted

  1,058,850 $13.32    

Exercised

  (85,694)$6.51    

Forfeited

  (28,075)$12.23    

Outstanding, December 31, 2016

  3,644,088 $10.25  7.59 

As of December 31, 2016:

          

Vested and expected to vest

  3,591,528 $10.22  7.57 

Exercisable

  1,503,004 $8.62  6.49 

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, and exercisable as of December 31, 2016 is approximately $54.7 million, $54.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, and exercisable as of December 31, 2015 is approximately $12.6 million, $12.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, and exercisable as of December 31, 2014 is approximately $2.0 million, $2.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

The weighted-average grant-dategrant date fair value of options granted for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $7.66, $6.05$21.50, $23.43 and $5.79$14.35 per share, respectively.

The total fair value of the underlying Common Stockcommon stock related to shares that vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018, and 20142017 was approximately $3.9$10.8 million, $2.6$8.3 million and $1.9$5.4 million, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised amounted to approximately $1.1 million, $1.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, was approximately $9.8 million and $7.2 million, respectively, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.7 and 2.5 years, respectively.

11.

12. Earnings per Share

Basic income (loss)earnings per share (EPS) is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shareshares outstanding. Diluted EPS is determined by dividing income (loss) attributable to common stockholders bycalculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, during the period, without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

11. Earnings per Share (Continued)

share equivalents outstanding for the period. The treasury stock method is used to determineincluding the dilutive effect of the Company'sCompany’s: stock option grants, SAR, and potentialgrants; SARs; warrants; ESPP awards,awards; and the if-converted method is used to determine2023 Notes, as determined per the dilutive effecttreasury stock method.


Effect of Convertible Notes and Related Convertible Note Hedges and Warrants

In connection with the issuance of the Company's Notes.

2023 Notes, the Company entered into Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transactions as described further in Note 9, Convertible Senior Notes Due 2023. The following common stock equivalents wereexpected collective impact of the Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transactions is to reduce the potential dilution that may occur between the conversion price of $59.33 per share and the strike price of the warrants of $80.9063 per share.


The 2023 Notes and related Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transactions are excluded in the calculation of diluted lossEPS because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Specifically, the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation excludes the additional shares related to the 2023 Notes and warrants, because the average price of the Company's common stock was less than the conversion price of the 2023 Notes of $59.33 per share and the strike price of the warrants of $80.9063 per share. Prior to actual conversion, the Convertible Note Hedge Transactions are not considered in calculating diluted earnings per share, as their impact would be anti-dilutive.


95

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12. Earnings per Share (Continued)


In addition to the above described effect of the 2023 Notes and the related Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transactions, the Company also excluded the common stock equivalents for outstanding stock-based awards in the calculation of diluted EPS, because their effectinclusion would be anti-dilutive as applied to the loss from continuing operations applicable to common stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

anti-dilutive.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Stock options1,145,446
 199,982
 40,009

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Shares underlying Convertible Senior Secured Notes

      7,995,340 

Warrants to purchase common stock

    20,957  20,499 

Stock options, stock appreciation rights, and ESPP awards

      306,776 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net incomeearnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017:
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Numerator, dollars in thousands: 
  
  
Net earnings$113,056
 $110,993
 $57,284
Adjustments:     
Interest expense on Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2019
 
 134
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities
 
 (76)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 295
Loss on extinguishment of outstanding debt, as if converted
 
 (321)
Total adjustments
 
 32
Net earnings used for calculation of diluted EPS$113,056
 $110,993
 $57,316
      
Denominator:     
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic52,412,181
 51,989,824
 50,756,603
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Shares underlying Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2019
 
 285,257
Shares issuable to settle interest make-whole derivatives
 
 7,012
Stock options and SAR1,404,573
 2,109,048
 2,252,278
Total dilutive potential common shares1,404,573
 2,109,048
 2,544,547
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted53,816,754
 54,098,872
 53,301,150
      
Earnings per share, basic$2.16
 $2.13
 1.13
Earnings per share, diluted$2.10
 $2.05
 1.08

13. Income Taxes
The significant components of income tax are as follows (dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts:

thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Current 
  
  
Federal$29,333
 $26,772
 $18,288
State10,930
 5,621
 3,822
Deferred     
Federal(4,551) (2,450) 21,493
State(1,281) (760) (269)
Total income tax expense$34,431
 $29,183
 $43,334


96

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Numerator, in thousands:

          

Net income (loss) used for calculation of basic EPS

 $91,221 $13,944 $(10,925)

Interest expense on convertible debt

  543  1,229   

Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities

  (448) (589)  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  671  2,338   

Loss on extinguishment of outstanding debt, as if converted

  (1,182) (2,494)  

Total adjustments

  (416) 484   

Net income used for calculation of diluted EPS

 $90,805 $14,428 $(10,925)

Denominator:

          

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic

  49,472,434  47,485,258  42,260,896 

Effect of dilutive potential common shares:

         

Shares underlying Convertible Senior Secured Notes

  1,222,363  2,459,009    

Shares issuable to settle interest make-whole derivatives

  71,537  804,507   

Stock options and stock appreciation rights

  942,649  411,606   

Total potential dilutive common shares

  2,236,549  3,675,122   

Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted

  51,708,983  51,160,380  42,260,896 

Net income (loss) per share, basic

 $1.84 $0.29 $(0.26)

Net income (loss) per share, diluted

 $1.76 $0.28 $(0.26)

Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

12.


13. Income Taxes

The components of the income tax (benefit)/ expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were as follow, in thousands:

(Continued)
 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Current

          

Federal

 $544 $624 $630 

State

  78  42   

Deferred

          

Federal

  (39,898)    

State

  (1,576)    

Total

 $(40,852)$666 $630 

A reconciliation of the expected income tax (benefit)/ expense computed usingat the U.S. Federalfederal statutory income tax rate to annual income tax expense at the Company's effective income tax rate is as follows (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Income tax expense computed at U.S. federal statutory income tax rate$30,972
 $29,437
 $35,217
State income taxes7,543
 3,674
 2,714
Permanent items1,332
 (2,196) (2,311)
Research and development credits(2,071) (3,199) (2,196)
Uncertain income tax position(2,992) 716
 (1,137)
Effect of U.S. tax law change(1)

 
 9,694
Other(353) 751
 1,353
Income tax expense$34,431
 $29,183
 $43,334


 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Income tax expense/(benefit) computed at U.S. Federal statutory tax rate

 $17,629 $5,114 $(3,603)

Permanent items

  715  601  610 

State income taxes

  (1,523) 42  (245)

Change in valuation allowance

  (56,019) (4,705) 4,413 

Uncertain income tax position

  143  533  (329)

Research and development credits

  (1,902) (979) (535)

Other

  105  60  (125)

Deferred rate change

      444 

Income tax (benefit)/expense

 $(40,852)$666 $630 

(1) Due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Act, which lowered the U.S. Corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. As a result, existing deferred taxes were remeasured.

97

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

12.


13. Income Taxes (Continued)


The significant components of the Company's deferred income tax assets (liabilities) wereare as follow (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
Deferred tax assets: 
  
Convertible bond hedge$17,197
 $21,412
Accrued product returns and rebates15,123
 13,205
Accrued compensation and stock based compensation10,349
 8,218
Non-recourse liability related to sale of future royalties5,320
 5,571
Research and development credit carryforwards3,817
 3,817
Amortization of intangibles4,617
 3,289
Net operating loss carryforwards2,245
 2,900
Operating lease liability8,187
 
Inventory1,385
 499
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) credit926
 978
Other199
 1,268
Total deferred tax assets69,365
 61,157
Less: valuation allowance(11) (9)
Total deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance69,354
 61,148
Deferred tax liability:   
Debt discount on 2023 Notes(14,109) (17,568)
Patent infringement legal costs(10,613) (10,697)
Operating lease assets(5,237) 
Depreciation(2,778) (236)
IRC Section 481(a) liability(2,126) (2,964)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities(2,428) 
Total deferred tax liabilities(37,291) (31,465)
Net deferred tax assets$32,063
 $29,683

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 

Deferred tax assets:

       

Net operating loss carryforward

 $24,926 $34,610 

Deferred rent credit

  417  532 

Accrued compensation and non-qualified stock options

  8,128  5,886 

Deferred financing costs

  128  187 

Depreciation and amortization

  706  290 

Research and development credits

  7,119  5,529 

Capitalized overhead into inventory (UNICAP §263A)

  1,086  543 

Nonrecourse liability related to sale of future royalties

  11,223  11,526 

Other

  878  498 

AMT credit

  1,581  1,108 

Valuation allowance

    (60,090)

Net deferred tax asset

  56,192  619 

Deferred tax liability:

  
 
  
 
 

Debt discount on convertible notes

  (141) (509)

Infringement legal cost

  (13,899)  

Depreciation

  (423) (110)

Net deferred taxes

 $41,729 $ 

In assessing the realizability of deferred income tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that some or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards are available. Management considers projected future taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, and available tax planning strategies that can be implemented by the Company in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the NOL and credit carryforwards are available to reduce income taxes payable, management had established in 2015 a full valuation allowance as the Company was not more likely than notdetermined it is more-likely-than-not to realize such net deferred tax assets.

During

The Company has NOL and other tax credit carryforwards in several jurisdictions. Due to changes in the third quarterCompany's ownership, the utilization of 2016,net operating loss carryforwards and research and development credit carryforwards, that can be used to offset future taxable income, are subject to annual limits in accordance with Internal Revenue Code (IRC) provisions, as well as similar state provisions. In addition, states may also impose other future limitations through state legislation or similar measures. Despite the NOL carryforwards, the Company determined the positive evidence regarding the valuation of the deferred tax assets outweighed the negative. Accordingly, the Company eliminated the valuation allowance of $60.1 million and recorded the assessment to the deferredmay incur higher state income tax expense.

expense in the future.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the U.S. Federalfederal and state NOL carryforwards amounted to approximately $87.3$10.8 million ($30.5and $9.9 million, tax effected) and $28.2 million ($1.6 million tax effected), respectively, and will expire in various years beginning in 2030. 2033. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company utilized NOLs of $10.2 million and expects the remaining federal and state NOL carryforwards to become available in the future years.

98

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)

13. Income Taxes (Continued)

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company has available research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $7.1$4.2 million, which expire, if unused,


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

12. Income Taxes (Continued)

starting in 2026. The use of the Company's U.S. Federal and state NOL carryforwards and research and development credits are restricted in annual use due to changes in the Company's ownership. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company utilized NOL's of approximately $48.1 million and expects the remaining $87.3 million of Federal NOL carryforwards to become available over the years from 2017 to 2020, in amounts ranging from $7.1 million to $20.3 million per year. In addition, the Company has available research and development credits of approximately $7.1 million, expected towill become available in 2020 and will expire, if unused, starting in 2026.

The Company is no longer subject to 2021. The Company's state NOL's will have a similar limitation to the amount noted for US Federal. Additionally, despite the NOL carryforwards, the Company may have a future tax liability due to state and localU.S. Federal income tax requirements. The Company paid no Federal income taxes inexaminations for years prior to 2016, with the years ended December 31,exception that operating loss or tax credit carryforwards generated prior to 2016 2015 or 2014.

may be subject to tax audit adjustment.

The Company accounts for uncertain income tax positions pursuant to the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2016, the Company accrued interest of a nominal amount and penalties of $0.1 million related to uncertain tax positions. The Company's income taxes have not been subject to examination by any tax jurisdictions since its inception in 2005. Due to NOL and research and development credit carryforwards, all U.S. Federal and state income tax returns filed by the Company are subject to examination by the taxing jurisdictions. Some uncertain income tax position liabilities have been recorded toagainst the Company's deferred income tax assets to offset such tax attribute carryforwards and other positions that can'tcannot be offset by tax attributes until a liability has been booked.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Balance as of January 1$8,848
 $8,859
 $9,299
Gross increases related to current year tax positions208
 1,108
 1,178
Gross increases related to prior year tax positions
 
 947
Gross decreases related to prior year tax positions(49) (484) 
Lapse of statute of limitations(3,029) (635) 
Change in tax rates
 
 (2,565)
Balance as of December 31$5,978
 $8,848
 $8,859

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2016 2015 2014 

Balance as of January 1

 $9,341 $8,964 $9,828 

Gross (decreases) increases related to prior-year tax positions

    (5) 18 

Gross increases related to current-year tax positions

  662  646  710 

Gross decreases related to prior-year tax positions

  (375)    

Gross decreases related to current-year tax positions

  (169) (243) (1,057)

Change in tax rates

  (160) (21) (535)

Balance as of December 31

 $9,299 $9,341 $8,964 

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, theThe Company recorded $0.5$3.0 million and $0.6 million of current tax expense on setting up anbenefit in 2019 and 2018, respectively, as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitation. The Company also recorded $0.2 million and $0.3 million for uncertain tax positionpositions related to the Alternative Minimum Tax.research and development tax credits in 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company does not anticipate a significant increase or decreasematerial impact to the financial statements in the uncertain income tax benefits within the next 12 months.

13. Commitmentsmonths as a result of uncertain tax positions and Contingencies

expiring statutes of limitation.

14.    Leases
The Company has concurrentoperating leases for its former headquarters office and lab space that extendat 1550 East Gude Drive in Rockville, MD and for its fleet vehicles. The Company’s existing leases for its former headquarters office and lab space run through April 2020. With respect to the fleet vehicle leases, given the volume of individual leases involved in the overall arrangement, the Company applies a portfolio approach to effectively account for the operating lease assets and liabilities.
New Headquarters Lease
The Company may electentered into a new lease agreement, effective January 31, 2019, with Advent Key West, LLC (Landlord), for its new headquarters in Rockville, MD (Premises). The term of the new headquarters lease commenced on February 1, 2019 (the Commencement Date) and will continue until April 30, 2034, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the lease. The lease includes options to extend the termlease for up to 10 years. Fixed rent with respect to the Premises began on the Commencement Date; however, the Landlord agreed to a rent abatement from the Commencement Date through April 30, 2020.
The initial fixed rental rate is approximately $195,000 per month for the first 12 months, and will automatically increase by 2% on each anniversary of the leasesCommencement Date. Under the terms of the Lease, the Company provided a security deposit of approximately $195,000, and will be required to pay all utility charges for an additional five-year term.the Premises in addition to its pro rata share of any operating expenses and real estate taxes. The leases


TableCompany will occupy the Premises upon completion of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notesthe build-out of the Premises, which is anticipated to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

provideoccur in the first half of 2020.

The lease also provides for a tenant improvement allowance of approximately $2.1$10.2 million, in aggregate. During the year ended December 31, 2016, none of theAll tenant improvement allowance was utilized. During the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately $0.2 million of the allowance washave been utilized and is included in fixed assets and deferred rent. Asas of December 31, 2016, $0.5 million2019 (see Note 5). The full amount of the tenant improvement allowance was initially recorded in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.


Operating lease assets, lease-related assets and lease liabilities as reported on the consolidated balance sheets are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 December 31,
2019
  
Assets 
Lease assets$21,279
  
Liabilities 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 
Lease liabilities, current$2,825
Noncurrent 
Lease liabilities, long term30,440
Total lease liabilities$33,265


Operating lease costs are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 December 31,
 2019
Fixed lease cost$4,990
Variable lease cost1,887
Total operating leases cost$6,877


Supplemental cash flow information related to leases is availableas follows (dollars in thousands):
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Cash paid for operating leases$5,337
 $5,196
Lease assets and tenant receivables obtained for new operating leases35,594
 

Weighted average lease term, and weighted average discount rate for tenant improvements. operating leases as of December 31, 2019, are as follows:
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)12.48
Weighted-average discount rate4.39%

Future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2019 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year ending December 31: 
2020$4,212
20214,130
20223,597
20232,537
Thereafter29,372
Total future minimum lease payments$43,848
Less: Imputed interest (1)
(10,583)
Present value of lease liabilities$33,265

(1) Calculated using the interest rate for each lease.
Disclosure Related to Periods Prior to Adoption of the New Lease Standard
Rent expense for the leased facilities and leased vehicles for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018 and 20142017 was approximately $3.6 million and $2.7 million, $2.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively.



Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelablenoncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2016 are2018 were as follows (dollars in thousands:

thousands):
Year ending December 31: 
2019$3,400
20202,287
Thereafter1,840
Total$7,527

Year ending December 31:

    

2017

  1,321 

2018

  1,314 

2019

  1,341 

Thereafter

  454 

 $4,430 

15. Accounts Receivable
As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company recorded allowances of approximately $11.0 million and $11.5 million, respectively, for prompt pay discounts and contractual service fees paid to the Company’s customers, who are primarily pharmaceutical wholesalers/distributors.

16. Disaggregated Revenues
The following tables summarize the disaggregation of revenue by nature (dollars in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
  
Net product sales 
  
  
Trokendi XR$295,214
 $315,295
 $226,518
Oxtellar XR88,186
 84,576
 67,579
Total net product sales383,400
 399,871
 294,097
Royalty revenues9,355
 8,276
 6,367
Licensing revenues
 750
 1,774
Total revenues$392,755
 $408,897
 $302,238

Trokendi XR accounted for more than 70% of the Company’s total net product sales in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The Company recognized noncash royalty revenue of $6.9 million, $5.9 million and $5.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, consequent to the Company's agreement with HC Royalty (see Note 2).
For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenues recognized from performance obligations related to prior periods (for example, due to changes in transaction price) were not material in the aggregate, to either Net Product Sales or to Royalty Revenue.
17. Commitments and Contingencies
Product Licenses
The Company has obtained exclusive licenses from third parties for proprietary rights to support the product candidates in the Company'sCompany’s neurology and psychiatry portfolio. Under these license agreements, with Afecta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Afecta), the Company has an exclusive optionmay be required to evaluate Afecta's CNS pipeline and to obtain exclusive worldwide rights to selected product candidates, including an exclusive license to SPN-810. Thepay certain amounts upon the achievement of defined milestones. If these products are ultimately commercialized, the Company does not owe any future milestone payments for SPN-810. The Company is also obligated to pay royalties to Afecta based on worldwidethird parties, as percentage of net product sales, infor each respective product under a license agreement.
Royalty Agreement
In the low-single digits.

Thethird quarter of 2014, the Company has also entered intoreceived a $30.0 million payment pursuant to a Royalty Interest Acquisition Agreement related to the purchase and saleby HC Royalty of certain of the Company’s rights under the Company’s agreement with Rune HealthCare Limited (Rune), whereUnited Therapeutics related to the commercialization of Orenitram (treprostinil) Extended-Release Tablets. Full ownership of the royalty rights will revert to the Company obtainedif and when a certain cumulative payment threshold is reached, per the exclusive worldwide rightsterms of the agreement (see Note 2, Note 10 and Note 16).



101

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to a product concept from Rune. There are no future milestone payments due to Rune under this agreement. If the Company receives approval to market and sell any products based on the Rune product concept for SPN-809, the Company is obligated to pay royalties to Rune based on net sales worldwide in the low single digits.

14.Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)


18. Employee Benefit Plan

On January 2, 2006, the Company established the Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the 401(k) Plan) for its employees under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Under the 401(k) Plan, all full-time employees who are at least 18 years old are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. Employees may participate starting on the first day of the month following employment. Employees may contribute up to the lesser of 90% of eligible compensation, or the applicable limit, as established by the Code.

Employees are 100% vested in their contributions to the 401(k) Plan.

The Company matches 100% of a participant's contribution for the first 3% of their salary deferral, and matches 50% of the next 2% of their salary deferral. As determined by the Board, the Company may elect to make a discretionary contribution not exceeding 60% of the annual compensation paid to all participating employees. The Company's contributions to the 401(k) Plan approximated $1.6were approximately $2.3 million, $1.4$2.1 million, and $1.1$1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

15. Collaboration Agreements

Royalty Revenue

In the third quarter of 2014, the Company received a $30.0 million payment pursuant to a Royalty Interest Acquisition Agreement related to the purchase by Healthcare Royalty Partners III, L.P. (HC Royalty), of certain of the Company's rights under the agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation related to the commercialization of Orenitram (treprostinil) Extended-Release Tablets. We will retain full ownership of the royalty rights if and when a certain threshold is reached per the terms of the Agreement. We have recorded a non-recourse liability related to this transaction and have begun to amortize this amount to recognize non-cash royalty revenue as royalties are received by HC Royalty from United Therapeutics. We also recognized non-cash interest expense related to this liability that accrues at an effective interest rate, which is determined based on projections of HC Royalty's rate of return. We recognized royalty revenue of $4.7 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We recognized non-cash interest expense of $4.5 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company has a license agreement with United Therapeutics Corporation to use one of its proprietary technologies for an oral formulation of Remodulin for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and potentially for additional indications. The revenue generated in the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2.0 million for a milestone payment.

16.

19. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited), see accompanying accountants' report

Quarterly financial information for fiscal 2016years 2019 and 20152018 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands,thousands), except per share data, unaudited:

data:
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
2019 
  
  
  
Revenues$85,474
 $104,695
 $102,140
 100,446
Total costs and expenses60,046
 62,097
 62,411
 59,630
Operating earnings25,428
 42,598
 39,729
 40,816
Net earnings18,340
 32,727
 28,860
 33,129
Earnings per share, basic0.35
 0.62
 0.55
 0.63
Earnings per share, diluted0.34
 0.61
 0.54
 0.62
2018       
Revenues$90,429
 $99,538
 $102,996
 $115,934
Total costs and expenses59,035
 63,818
 65,521
 76,079
Operating earnings31,394
 35,720
 37,475
 39,855
Net earnings26,352
 30,737
 28,011
 25,893
Earnings per share, basic0.51
 0.59
 0.54
 0.50
Earnings per share, diluted0.49
 0.57
 0.52
 0.48

 
 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 

2016

             

Revenue

 $44,194 $51,626 $56,810 $62,374 

Total costs and expenses

  37,757  39,981  36,971  46,078 

Operating income

  6,437  11,645  19,839  16,296 

Net income

  4,825  10,251  61,826  14,320 

Net income per share, basic

  0.10  0.21  1.25  0.29 

Net income per share, diluted

  0.08  0.18  1.18  0.26 

2015

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Revenue

 $28,738 $35,678 $39,362 $43,687 

Total costs and expenses

  24,704  31,834  34,277  35,806 

Operating income

  4,034  3,844  5,085  7,881 

Net income

  738  2,437  3,916  6,853 

Net income per share, basic

  0.02  0.05  0.08  0.14 

Net income per share, diluted

  0.02  0.04  0.08  0.14 

17. Subsequent Events

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, holders of the Notes converted approximately $1.0 million of the Notes. We issued a total of approximately 0.2 million shares of common stock in conversion of the


Table of Contents


Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

17. Subsequent Events (Continued)

principal amount of the Notes and accrued interest thereon resulting in a remaining outstanding balance of $3.6 million.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Company entered into settlement and license agreements with Zydus Pharmaceutical (USA), Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Limited (collectively, "Zydus") and with Actavis Laboratories, FL, Inc. et al. (collectively, "Actavis," now a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd.) to settle ongoing patent litigation regarding Zydus' and Actavis' respective ANDA filings seeking approval to market a generic version of the Company's Trokendi XR (extended-release topiramate) capsules. These agreements prohibit Zydus and Actavis from selling a generic version of Trokendi XR before January 1, 2023 except under certain circumstances.


Table of Contents

ITEM 9.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 there are two certifications, termed the Section 302 certifications, one by each of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO). This Item 9A contains information concerning the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting that is referred to in the Section 302 Certifications. This information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act has been appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016,2019, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016 at the reasonable assurance level because of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below.

Notwithstanding the identified material weaknesses, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows at and for the periods presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

2016 was the first year that the Company was subject to compliance and testing procedures under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act relating to internal controls over financial reporting.

2019.

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the management of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Table of Contents

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Because of itstheir inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019 based on criteria related to internal control over financial reporting described inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013 Framework). Based on management's assessment using these criteria, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2016, ourthe Company's internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the following control deficiencies.

The Company did not have adequately trained resources with assigned responsibility and accountability over the design and operation of internal controls. Specifically, Company personnel did not have a sufficient understanding of the COSO 2013 Framework and its application to internal controls over financial reporting, and their responsibilities for effective internal control. Also, the Company did not have an effective risk assessment process that assessed necessary changes in financial reporting and internal controls impacted by changes in information technology systems.

As a consequence, the Company did not have effective control activities over the following.

    The Company did not have effective operation of controls over the completeness and accuracy of key assumptions and data analyzed by a third party consultant and ultimately used by management to determine the returns portion of accrued sales deductions.

    The Company did not have effective general information technology controls ("GITCs") over the Microsoft Dynamics AX information technology system and the employee expense reimbursement system. Specifically, the Company did not have IT user access controls designed to restrict privileges to IT applications and the AX database commensurate with their assigned authorities and responsibilities. Furthermore, the Company did not have adequate program change controls over the AX IT applications and the AX database, designed to actively monitor program changes so as to ensure that changes were appropriate and that any deficiencies were investigated and remediated. As a result, process-level automated and manual controls related to these IT systems were also ineffective. These IT systems affect all financial reporting processes.

The control deficiencies described above resulted in no misstatements in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. However, these control deficiencies create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We concluded that the deficiencies represent material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2016.

The2019.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company's consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and their opinion with respect to the fairness of the presentation of the financial statements is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. KPMG LLP has expressed an adverse report onalso audited the effectiveness of ourCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2019. Their responsibility is to evaluate whether internal controls over financial reporting was designed and operating effectively. Their report is included herein.


Tableon the effectiveness of Contents

Management's Remediation Plan

The Company will execute the following steps in 2017 to remediate the aforementioned material weaknesses in itsCompany's internal control over financial reporting:

    The Company is actively looking to recruit personnel that have requisite experience working with the implementationreporting as of financial accounting and internal controls policies and procedures.

    The Company will sponsor ongoing training related to the COSO 2013 Framework best practices for personnel that are accountable for internal control over financial reporting.

    The Company has taken certain actions and plans to take further action to strengthen our control procedures surrounding GITCs, IT user access review and program change controls including the logging of changes to the IT applications and the database.

While the audit committee of our board of directors and senior management are closely monitoring this remediation, until the remediation efforts discussedDecember 31, 2019 included in this section, including any additional remediation efforts that our senior management identifies as necessary, are complete, tested and determined effective, we will not be able to conclude that the material weaknesses have been remediated. In addition, we may need to incur incremental costs associated with this remediation, primarily due to the hiring and training of finance and accounting personnel, and the implementation of improved training procedures.

Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, evaluated changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016. Other than the material weaknesses identified and assessed during the quarter described above under "Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting," there2019. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We identified material weaknesses as of December 31, 2015 in internal control over financial reporting. Management's review revealed that our risk assessment process and our review controls over the accounting for significant, complex, and unusual accounting transactions were deficient, in that these controls were not designed to ensure that sufficient technical accounting expertise was applied to assess and document the appropriate accounting over such transactions. The presence of these control deficiencies created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Therefore, we concluded that the deficiencies represented a material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting and that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2015. We believe the processes and control activities specific to determining and documenting the appropriate accounting for significant, complex and unusual accounting transactions were remediated as of December 31, 2016. During 2016 and particularly in the fourth quarter of 2016, we took action to strengthen our internal control procedures regarding the review of the accounting for significant, complex, and unusual transactions. Specifically, during 2016 we engaged third party accounting service providers with appropriate and relevant subject matter expertise to supplement our existing resources related to several accounting matters. This engagement included, among other actions, thorough considerations of potential alternative accounting treatment regarding significant, complex, and unusual transactions. We will continue this practice on a going forward basis.

ITEM 9B.     OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.


Table of Contents


PART III

ITEM 10.     DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of our Proxy Statement for our 20172020 Annual Meeting to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.

2019.

ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of our Proxy Statement for our 20172020 Annual Meeting to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.

2019.

ITEM 12.     SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is set forth below. The remainder of the information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference fromto our definitive proxy statement for our 20172020 Annual Meeting to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.

2019.

The following table shows the number of securities that may be issued pursuant to our equity compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) as of December 31, 2016:


2019:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category
 Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights(1)
 Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights(1)
 Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in the first
column(2))
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  3,644,088 $10.25  4,387,491 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

       

Total

  3,644,088 $10.25  4,387,491 

(1)
The securities that may be issued are shares of the Company's Common Stock, issuable upon conversion of outstanding stock options.

(2)
The securities that remain available for future issuance are issuable pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.
Plan category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(1)
 
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights(1)
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in the first
column(2))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders4,606,559
 $23.05
 1,972,307
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 
Total4,606,559
 $23.05
 1,972,307

(1)
The securities that may be issued are shares of the Company's Common Stock, issuable upon conversion of outstanding stock options.
(2)
The securities that remain available for future issuance are issuable pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

ITEM 13.     CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of our Proxy Statement for our 20172020 Annual Meeting to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.

2019.

ITEM 14.     PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of our Proxy Statement for our 20172020 Annual Meeting to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2016.

2019.

Table of Contents


PART IV

ITEM 15.     EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

    (a)(1)  Index to consolidated Financial Statements

(a)(1)Index to consolidated Financial Statements
The Financial Statements listed in the Index to Consolidatedconsolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Part II, Item 8, "Financial8—Financial Statement and Supplementary Data."

    (a)(2)  Financial Statement Schedules

Data.

(a)(2)Financial Statement Schedules
Other financial statement schedules for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes to consolidated financial statements.

    (a)(3)  Exhibits

(a)(3)Exhibits
The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are attached and incorporated herein by reference and filed as part of this report.

ITEM 16:     FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not applicable.

None.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Securities 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Date: March 15, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and the dates indicated below:

Signature
Title
Date





/s/ JACK A. KHATTAR

President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)March 15, 2017

/s/ GREGORY S. PATRICK



Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


March 15, 2017

/s/ CHARLES W. NEWHALL, III.



Director and Chairman of the Board


March 15, 2017

/s/ GEORGES GEMAYEL



Director


March 15, 2017

/s/ FREDERICK M. HUDSON



Director


March 15, 2017

/s/ WILLIAM A. NUERGE



Director


March 15, 2017

/s/ JOHN M. SIEBERT, PH.D.



Director


March 15, 2017

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
*
   
3.23.2
*
   
4.14.1
*
   
4.24.2
*
4.3*Form of 7.50% Convertible Senior Secured Note due 2019trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2013,March 20, 2018, File No. 001-35518).
   
4.34.4
*Security and Pledge Agreement dated as
   
10.14.5*First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 24, 2013 by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2013, File No. 001-35518).
10.1
*+
   
10.210.2
*+
   
10.310.3
*+
   
10.410.4
*+
   
10.510.5
*
   
10.610.6
*
 
  

Table of Contents


Exhibit
Number
Description
10.8
*
   
10.9*Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, by and among the Registrant and the holders of shares of Series A convertible preferred stock identified therein, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-171375, as amended on December 23, 2011).
10.10
†*
   
10.1010.11
†*
   
10.1110.12
†*
   
10.1210.13
†*
   
10.1310.14
†*
   
10.1410.15
†*
   
10.1510.16
*
   
10.1610.17
*+
   
10.1710.18
*+
 
  

Table of Contents


10.23*Amendment No. 2 to Investor Rights Agreement dated April 6, 2012 by and among the Registrant and the holders of shares of Series A convertible preferred stock identified therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-171375, as amended on April 11, 2012).
Exhibit
Number
 Description
10.2010.24
*+
   
10.2110.25
†*
   
10.2210.26
*
   
10.2310.27
†*
   
10.2410.28
*+
   
10.2510.29
*
   
10.2610.30
*
   
10.2710.31
*+
   
10.2810.32
*+
   
10.2910.33
*
   
10.3010.34
*
   
10.3110.35
*+
 
  

Table of Contents


Exhibit
Number
Description
   
10.3310.37
*+
   
10.3410.38
*+
   
10.3514
*Code of Ethics.
   
10.3621
*Subsidiaries of the Registrant
   
10.3723.1
**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
   
10.3823.2
**Consent of KPMG LLP
   
10.39
*
 31.1
10.40
*
10.41
*
10.42
*
10.43
*

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.44
*
10.45
*
10.46
*
10.47
*
10.48
*
10.49
*
10.50
*+
10.51
*+
10.52
*
10.53
*

10.54
*
14
*
21
**
23.1
**

Exhibit
Number
Description
31.1
**
   
31.231.2
**
   
32.132.1
**
   
32.232.2
**
101
**The following financial information from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) Cover Page; (ii) Consolidated Statement of Earnings; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Earnings; (iv) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (v) Consolidated Statements of Equity; (vi) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vii) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in summary and detail.
104
**The Cover Page of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL (included with the Exhibit 101 attachments).

Confidential treatment requested under 17 C.F.R. §§200.80(b)(4) and 230.406. The confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted and are marked accordingly. The confidential portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Confidential Treatment Request.
+Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which directors or officers participate.
*Previously filed.
**Filed herewith.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Securities 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
By:/s/ JACK A. KHATTAR
Name:Jack A. Khattar
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 28, 2020
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and the dates indicated below:
SignatureTitleDate
    
/s/ JACK A. KHATTAR 101 INSPresident and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)**XBRL Instance Document.February 28, 2020
    
/s/ GREGORY S. PATRICK 101 SCHSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Documents.February 28, 2020
    
/s/ CHARLES W. NEWHALL, III. 101 CALDirector and Chairman of the Board**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.February 28, 2020
    
/s/ CARROLEE BARLOW, M.D., PH.D. 101 DEFDirector**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.February 28, 2020
    
/s/ GEORGES GEMAYEL, PH.D. 101 LABDirector**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label/Linkbase Document.February 28, 2020
    
/s/ FREDERICK M. HUDSONDirectorFebruary 28, 2020
 101 PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
/s/ JOHN M. SIEBERT, PH.D.DirectorFebruary 28, 2020


Confidential treatment requested under 17 C.F.R. §§200.80(b)(4) and 230.406. The confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted and are marked accordingly. The confidential portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theConfidential Treatment Request.

+
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which directors or officers participate.

*
Previously filed.

**
Filed herewith.
112