Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. / /Yes/ Yes /X/ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. / /Yes/ Yes /X/ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. /X/ Yes / /No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website,Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer / /                                                                                          Accelerated filer / /

Non-accelerated filer /X/ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                Smaller reporting company / /

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). / /Yes/ Yes /X/ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. / /Yes/ Yes / / No

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

EXPLANATORY NOTES

The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 6.3% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan and three other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number 333-184376-11 (the “COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction, is also the primary servicer of this loan combination. The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction. Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.

The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 11.3% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity.  This loan combination, including the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan, was serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the issuing entity prior to the closing of the securitization of the other pari passu portion of the 25 Broadway loan combination in the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number 333-193376-05 (the “COMM“COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction”Transaction”).  After the closing of the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction on May 13, 2014, thethis loan combination, including the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan, was, and will continue to be, serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement with respect to the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction, is also the primary servicer of this loan combination (only with respect to the obligation to make property protection and mortgage payment advances).  The responsibilities of Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction.  Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) is the certificate administrator of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the primary servicer of the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Thus,As a result, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer,”“servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, with respect to these mortgage loansin the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans whichthat constituted 10% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

U. S.

U.S. Bank National Association acts as Trustee with respect totrustee of the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan and the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreements with respect toagreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction and the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction, the Trusteetrustee is required to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified in the transaction agreements). However, the Trusteetrustee is not required to deliver such assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria with respect to any reporting period during which there waswere no servicing criteria applicable to the Trustee,trustee, as was the case during the reporting period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of the Trustee. The assessmenttrustee. One or more other servicers of the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan and the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of the Master Servicer coversrespect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountant’saccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. and National Tax Search, LLC. These entities were engaged by the primary servicer of the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan to remit tax payments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxing authorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, and to verify non-escrow tax payments. These services are included within the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii). Therefore, under the principles-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) that looks to the functions that an entity performs, these vendors are “servicers” for the purposes of Item 1122. See Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

PART I

Item 1.  Business.

Omitted.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

Omitted.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.  Properties.

Omitted.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

Omitted.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Omitted.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

Omitted.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Omitted.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Omitted.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Omitted.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Omitted.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.

Omitted.

Item 9B.  Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Omitted.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation.

Omitted.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Omitted.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Omitted.

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

The 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan (Loan Number 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of the Registrantregistrant relating to the issuing entity filed on April 7, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item 1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB.AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement. In accordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited net operating income of the significant obligor was $13,864,313.16$20,504,887.00 for the twelvetwelve- month period ended December 31, 2014.2015.

Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routine litigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and the following, with respect to KeyBank National Association, as master servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee and certificate administrator, U.S. Bank, National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator and custodian, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as certificate administrator:administrator and custodian, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee:

On February 23, 2016, a certificateholder of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust, Series 2007-CIBC18 (the “Trust”), filed suit in the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York, against KeyBank National Association and Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC (collectively, the “Servicers”).  The suit was filed derivatively on behalf of the Trust.  The action was brought in connection with the Servicers’ determination of the fair value of a loan, secured by the Bryant Park Hotel in New York City, held by the Trust and sold to an assignee of the Trust’s directing certificateholder, pursuant to an exercise of the fair value option.  There can be no assurances as to the outcome of the action or the possible impact of the litigation on the Servicers.  Both Servicers deny liability, believe that they performed their obligations in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement applicable to the Trust, and intend to contest the claims asserted against them.

On June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed a civil complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee under 276 residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts, which was later amended on July 18, 2014, to increase the number of trusts to 284 RMBS trusts.  On November 24, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the state court action without prejudice.  That same day, a group of institutional investors filed a civil complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleging claims against the bank in its capacity as trustee for 274 RMBS trusts (the “Complaint”). In December 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court action was granted.  As with the prior state court action, the Complaint is one of six similar complaints filed contemporaneously against RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and US Bank) by a group of institutional investor plaintiffs.  The Complaint against Wells Fargo Bank N.A. alleges that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserts causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's alleged failure to (i) enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default purportedly caused by breaches by mortgage loan servicers, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought includes money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief.  Other cases (collectively, the “Additional Complaints”) alleging similar causes of action have been filed against Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and other trustees in the same court by RMBS investors in these and other transactions.transactions, and these cases have been consolidated before the same judge. On January 19, 2016, an order was entered in connection with the Complaint in which the District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction over 261 trusts at issue in the Complaint; the District Court also allowed Plaintiffs to file amended complaints if they so chose, and three amended complaints have been filed. There can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on the trustee or the RMBS trusts. However, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of any losses to investors, and that it has meritorious defenses, and it intends to contest the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously.

InOn June 18, 2014, a civilgroup of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed a derivative action against Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”)  in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (TIA), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBNTC and DBTCA’s alleged failure to perform their duties as trustees for the trusts. Plaintiffs subsequently dismissed their state court complaint wasand filed a derivative and class action complaint in the SupremeU.S. District Court offor the StateSouthern District of New York on behalf of and for the benefit of 564 private-label RMBS trusts, which substantially overlapped with the trusts at issue in the state court action. The complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $89.4 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss, and on January 19, 2016, the court partially granted the motion on procedural grounds: as to the 500 trusts that are governed by Pooling and Servicing Agreements, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction. The court did not rule on substantive defenses asserted in the motion to dismiss as to the 64 trusts formed under indentures for which it retained jurisdiction.  Instead, the court ordered plaintiffs to file an amended complaint as to those indenture trusts. On February 23, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint as to 62 of the 64 indenture trusts included in the original U.S. District Court complaint. DBNTC and DBTCA will have an opportunity to file new defensive motions with respect to this amended complaint. It is anticipated that plaintiffs will, in the near future, file a new state court complaint as to some or all of the 500 trusts governed by Pooling and Servicing Agreements which were dismissed from the U.S. District Court action. 

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. filed a Summons With Notice in New York County, bystate court naming as defendants DBNTC and DBTCA, as trustees of 37 RMBS trusts (the “IKB Action”).  The claims in the IKB Action appear to be substantively similar to the SDNY Action.  The IKB Action is not styled as a groupputative class action, but may attempt to bring derivative claims on behalf of institutionalthe named RMBS Trusts.  DBTCA intends to vigorously defend the IKB Action.

DBTCA has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA's present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as Certificate Administrator and Custodian under the pooling and servicing agreements for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction and the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction.

Since 2014 various plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs, primarily investors, have filed claims against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), in its capacity as trustee or successor trustee (as the case may be) under certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. The plaintiffs are investment funds formed by nine investment advisors (AEGON, BlackRock, Brookfield, DZ Bank, Kore, PIMCO, Prudential, Sealink and TIAA) that purport to be bringing suit derivatively on behalf of 841 RMBS trusts that issued $771 billion in original principal amount of securities between 2004 and 2008. According to the plaintiffs, cumulative losses for these RMBS trusts equal $92.4 billion as of the date of the complaint. The complaint is one of sixor plaintiff groups have filed substantially similar complaints filed against other RMBS trustees, (Deutscheincluding Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo) by certain of these plaintiffs.Fargo. The complaintcomplaints against U.S. Bank allegesallege the trustee caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers for these RMBS trusts and assertsassert causes of action based upon the trustee's purported failure to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties concerning loan quality. The complaintcomplaints also assertsassert that the trustee failed to notify securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers and that the trustee purportedly failed to abide by appropriate standardsa heightened standard of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought includes money damages

Currently U.S. Bank is a defendant in an unspecified amountmultiple actions alleging individual or class action claims against the trustee with respect to multiple trusts as described above with the most substantial case being: BlackRock Balanced Capital Portfolio et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, No. 605204/2015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (class action alleging claims with respect to approximately 794 trusts) and equitable relief. In November 2014,its companion case BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio et al v. U.S Bank National Association, No. 14-cv-9401 (S.D.N.Y.). Some of the plaintiffs sought leave to voluntarily dismiss their original state court complaint and filed a substantially similar complainttrusts implicated in the United States District Court for the Southern Districtaforementioned Blackrock cases, as well as other trusts, are involved in actions brought by separate groups of New York. The federal civil complaint added a class action allegation and a change in the total number of namedplaintiffs related to no more than 100 trusts to 843 RMBS trusts. In December 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court complaint was granted. Other cases alleging similar causes of action have previously been filed against U.S. Bank and other trustees by RMBS investors in other transactions.per case.

There can be no assurancesassurance as to the outcome of any of the litigation, or the possible impact of the litigationthese litigations on the trustee or the RMBS trusts. However, U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of losses to investors and that it has meritorious defenses, and it intends to contest the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) has been named as a defendant in civil litigation concerning its role as trustee of certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. On June 18, 2014, a group of investors (“Plaintiff Investors”) filed a civil action against DBTCA and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBTCA's and DBNTC's alleged failure to perform their obligations as trustees for the trusts (the “NY Derivative Action”). An amended complaint was filed on July 16, 2014, adding Plaintiff Investors and RMBS trusts to the NY Derivative Action. On November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff Investors moved to voluntarily dismiss the NY Derivative Action without prejudice. Also on November 24, 2014, substantially the same group of Plaintiff Investors filed a civil action against DBTCA and DBNTC in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY Action”), making substantially the same allegations as the New York Derivative Action with respect to 564 RMBS trusts (542 of which were at issue in the NY Derivative Action). The SDNY Action is styled both as a derivative action on behalf of the named RMBS Trusts and, in the alternative, as a putative class action on behalf of holders of RMBS representing interests in those RMBS trusts. DBTCA is vigorously defending the SDNY Action. DBTCA has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA's present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in this paragraph) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as Trustee on behalf of the Certificateholders.

Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

The information regarding this Item has been previously provided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuing entity filed on April 7, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Google and Amazon Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the 25 Broadway Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

Management’s assessment of compliance with Regulation AB servicing criteria furnished pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB by KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 33.1 (the “KeyBank Assessment”) identified the following material instances of noncompliance with servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(xv) during the calendar year ended December 31, 2014 with respect to commercial mortgage loans.

Servicing Criteria Impacted:

1122(d)(4)(xv) –Any external enhancement or other support, identified in Item 1114(a)(1) through (3) or item 1115 of Regulation AB, is maintained as set forth in the transaction agreements.

Material Instances of Noncompliance with Servicing Criteria:

Regarding external enhancements, specifically letters of credit, upon transfer of the servicing of the mortgage loans to KeyBank from the previous servicer, KeyBank was not properly named as the beneficiary on certain letters of credit because of deficiencies in policies and procedures relating to changes in named beneficiary.  KeyBank identified eighty mortgage loans that did not properly name KeyBank as beneficiary on the letters of credit.

Remediation:

The following remediation procedures have been initiated by KeyBank: (i) the impacted mortgage loans have been identified, (ii) borrower contact has been initiated, (iii) corrective actions are underway and are being tracked and monitored by senior management, (iv) procedures have been revised to include new tracking and action steps to prevent this situation from reoccurring in the future, and (v) training has been provided to the relevant staff members to prevent a recurrence, and (vi) updates will be made to software systems to assist staff members with compliance.

As of the date of the KeyBank Assessment, there are thirty-one mortgage loans contained within fourteen transactions for which the beneficiary name on the letters of credit still needs to be corrected.  The fourteen transactions are listed below, with the following information with respect to each transaction: the number of impacted mortgage loans to be corrected included in such transaction, and the aggregate amount of the letters of credit related to such impacted mortgage loans to be corrected.

During the calendar year ended December 31, 2014, no demands were made upon any of the impacted letters of credit, and thus, none of the affected transactions were materially impacted.

*The accountant’s attestation report referred to in the KeyBank Assessment includes only item 1 and item 2 (other than the last sentence thereof) referred to above.

Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

4.1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 499.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K8-K/A filed on January 22,May 19, 2014 in connection with the COMM 2014-CCRE14 Transactionunder Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 499.5 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K8-K/A filed on May 13,19, 2014 in connection with the COMM 2014-CCRE17 Transactionunder Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein).

31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.Certifications.

33 Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

34 Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

35 Servicer compliance statements.

99.1 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and German American Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and German American Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.3 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and The Bancorp Bank (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.4 Primary Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014, between Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association and KeyBank National Association (filed as Exhibit 99.6 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

(b) The exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above and in the Exhibit Index that immediately follows the signature page hereof.

(c) Not Applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

/s/ Natalie Grainger

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.

4.1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein).

31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.Certifications.

33 Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

34 Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

35 Servicer compliance statements.

99.1 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and German American Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and German American Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.3 Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation and The Bancorp Bank (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.4 Primary Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014, between Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association and KeyBank National Association (filed as Exhibit 99.6 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 19, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-193376-04 and incorporated by reference herein)