UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

/X/x  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017

or

/ /  oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-190246-09

Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity: 0001621379

JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C242014‑C24

(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001013611

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

(exact name of the depositor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000835271

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000312070

Barclays Bank PLC

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001089877

KeyBank National Association

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001628601

Column Financial, Inc.

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001587045

RAIT Funding, LLC

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000040554

General Electric Capital Corporation

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

as Certificate Administrator

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD

(Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity)

21045

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(212) 272-6858

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  / /o Yes /X/⌧ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  / /o Yes /X/⌧ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  /X/⌧ Yes / /o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer        / /o                                                                                                        Accelerated filer                                      / /o

Non-accelerated filer          /X/⌧  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                            Smaller reporting company                     / /o

                                                                                                                                                        Emerging growth company                     o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.                                             o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  / /o Yes /X/⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.  / /o Yes / /o No

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

EXPLANATORY NOTES

The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 2.4% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan and two other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the COMM 2014-UBS5 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number 333-193376-10 (the “COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction.  The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction.  Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.

The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 7.6% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan and three other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C22 transaction, Commission File Number 333-195164-01 (the “WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction.  The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction.  Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.

The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan and the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 9.0% and 5.9%, respectively, of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan and the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan are each an asset of the issuing entity and are each part of a loan combination that includes (a) with respect to the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan and four other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity or (b) with respect to the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of each loan combination was securitized in the JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C23 transaction, Commission File Number 333-190246-08 (the “JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction”). These loan combinations, including the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan and the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, are being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction.  The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of these loan combinations with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction.  Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to these loan combinations.

The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 2.8% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity.  This loan combination, including the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan, was serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the issuing entity prior to the closing of the securitization of the other pari passu portion of the Hilton Houston Post Oak loan combination in the JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C25 transaction, Commission File Number 333-190246-10 (the “JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction”).  After the closing of the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction on November 24, 2014, this loan combination, including the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan was, and will continue to be, serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement with respect to the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction.  The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction.  Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer and certificate administrator of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the primary servicer and certificate administrator of the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan. As a result, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the custodian of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan.  As a result, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a servicing function participant in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Pentalpha Surveillance LLC is the senior trust advisor of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan and the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan.  As a result, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC is a servicing function participant in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports delivered by Pentalpha Surveillance LLC in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

CWCapital Asset Management LLC is the special servicer of the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan. As a result, CWCapital Asset Management LLC is a “servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements delivered by CWCapital Asset Management LLC in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC is the special servicer of the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan.  These mortgage loans constitute more than 5%, but less than 10%, of the pool assets of the issuing entity.  Therefore, the Depositor included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria for Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC and an accountants’ attestation report pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB because Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC is servicing more than 5% of the pool assets.  However, the Depositor is not required to include in this Annual Report on Form 10-K a servicer compliance statement pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC because Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC is an unaffiliated servicer servicing less than 10% of pool assets.

Wilmington Trust, National Association acts as trustee of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan.  Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction, the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction, the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction and the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified in the transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trustee did not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The master servicer or the special servicer, to the extent required, performed the servicing function identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and each such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountant’s attestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of the trustee. One or more other servicers of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. and National Tax Search, LLC.  These entities were engaged by the master servicer (except with respect to those mortgage loans for which KeyBank National Association is the primary servicer) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the primary servicer of the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan to remit tax payments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxing authorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, and to verify non-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are included within the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB.  Therefore, under the principles-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, these vendors are “servicers” for the purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  See Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

With respect to the pari passu loan combinations that includes the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan, (i) the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria of Situs Holdings, LLC as operating advisor of the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as it is not required to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation AB because it is a party performing activities that address servicing criteria relating to 5% or less of the assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) the servicer compliance statements of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as special servicer of the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan and the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as they are not required by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K because they are each an unaffiliated party that is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

PART I

Item 1.  Business.

Omitted.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

Omitted.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.  Properties.

Omitted.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

Omitted.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Omitted.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

Omitted.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Omitted.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Omitted.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Omitted.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Omitted.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.

Omitted.

Item 9B.  Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Omitted.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation.

Omitted.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Omitted.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Omitted.

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Omitted.

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB

Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

No single obligor represents 10% or more of the pool assets held by the issuing entity.

Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routine litigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and the following, with respect to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator and custodian, KeyBank National Association, as primary servicer, and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer:

On June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed a civil complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”Bank”), in its capacity as trustee under 276 residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”RMBS”) trusts, which was later amended on July 18, 2014, to increase the number of trusts to 284 RMBS trusts. On November 24, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the state court action without prejudice. That same day, a group of institutional investors filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”“District Court”) against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against the bank in its capacity as trustee for 274 RMBS trusts (the “Federal“Federal Court Complaint”Complaint”). In December 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court action was granted. As with the prior state court action, the Federal Court Complaint is one of six similar complaints filed contemporaneously against RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and US Bank) by a group of institutional investor plaintiffs. The Federal Court Complaint against Wells Fargo Bank alleges that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserts causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's alleged failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought includes money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. Other cases alleging similar causes of action have been filed against Wells Fargo Bank and other trustees in the District Court by RMBS investors in these and other transactions, and these cases against Wells Fargo Bank are proceeding before the same District Court judge. A similar complaint was also filed May 27, 2016 in New York state court by a different plaintiff investor. On January 19, 2016, an order was entered in connection with the Federal Court Complaint in which the District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction over 261 trusts at issue in the Federal Court Complaint; the District Court also allowed plaintiffs to file amended complaints as to the remaining, non-dismissed trusts, if they so chose, and three amended complaints have been filed. On December 17, 2016, the investor plaintiffs in the 261 trusts dismissed from the Federal Court Complaint filed a new complaint in New York state court (the “State“State Court Complaint”Complaint”). Motions to dismiss allIn September 2017, Royal Park Investments SA/NV (“Royal Park”), one of the actionsplaintiffs in the District Court cases against Wells Fargo Bank, filed a putative class action complaint relating to two trusts seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages based on Wells Fargo Bank’s indemnification from trust funds for legal fees and expenses Wells Fargo Bank incurs or has incurred in defending the District Court case filed by Royal Park. With respect to the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are pending except forwithout merit and intends to contest the recently filed State Court Complaint. Thereclaims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on the trusteeWells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts. However, Wells Fargo Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of any losses to investors, and that it has meritorious defenses, and it intends to contest the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously.

On February 23, 2016, a certificate holdercertificateholder of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust, Series 2007-CIBC18 (the “Trust”“Trust”) filed suit in the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York, against KeyBank National Association and Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC (collectively, the “Servicers”“Servicers”).  The suit was filed derivatively on behalf of the Trust.  The action was brought in connection with the Servicers’ determination of the fair value of a loan, secured by the Bryant Park Hotel in New York City, held by the Trust and sold to an assignee of the Trust’s directing certificate holder,certificateholder, pursuant to an exercise of the fair value option set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the Trust.  There can be no assurances as to the outcome of the action or the possible impact of the litigation on the Servicers.  Both Servicers deny liability, believe that they performed their obligations in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and have contested the claims asserted against them, filing a motion to dismiss the case.  On November 28, 2016, the Servicers’ motion to dismiss was granted.  The plaintiff certificate holdercertificateholder has filed a notice of appeal, and the appeal is pending.

On January 24, 2016 PSW NYC LLC commencedDecember 1, 2017, a complaint (the “PSW Complaint”) with the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “PSW Court”) against Bank of America, N.A. as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreements for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30 and COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee under the pooling and servicing agreements for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-5 and ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 (collectively, the “Trusts”), PCV-M Holdings LLC and CWCapital Asset Management LLC individually(“CWCAM”) and as special servicerothers was filed in the United States District Court for the Trusts (collectively, the “Defendants”) seeking either (a) damages in an amount to be determined by the PSW Court but alleged by the plaintiffs to be approximately $500,000,000 – such amount being the amount PSW NYC LLC alleges would have been recovered on certain mezzanine loans (the “Mezzanine Loans”) related to the Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town property (the “PCVST Property”) inSouthern District of New York City which PSW NYCstyled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, sold to an entity related to the Defendants pursuant to a settlement agreement related to certain prior litigation (the “Settlement Agreement”) or (b) the rescissionet al., No. 17-cv-9463. The gravamen of the Settlement Agreement which would resultcomplaint alleges breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’s affiliate, CWCapital Investments LLC in among other things,its capacity as collateral manager for the rescission of the sale of the Mezzanine Loans and a claim for certain proceeds from the sale of the PCVST Property. PSW NYC LLC alleges that the Defendants procured the Settlement Agreement by fraud and further that the terms of the Settlement Agreement were breached by the Defendants. On February 26, 2016, CWCAM on behalf of itself and the other Defendants filled a motion to dismiss the complaint (the “CWCAM Motion to Dismiss”). Oral argument has been set by the PSW Court on the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss for August 23, 2016. There can be no assurances as to the outcome of this CWCAM Motion to Dismiss or the PSW Complaint or the possible impact on CWCAM. However, CWCAM believes that it was not guilty of any fraudcollateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. In total, there are fourteen (14) counts pled in the procurementcomplaint. Of those 14, five (5) claims are asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and unjust enrichment. CWCAM denies the Settlement Agreement, that it performed its obligations under applicable poolingclaims and servicing agreements in good faith and disputes PSW NYC LLC allegations. CWCAM intends to vigorously contest such allegations.defend itself against these claims.

Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

The information regarding this Item has been previously provided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuing entity filed on October 22, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit AA to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Canyon Ranch Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the COMM 2014-UBS5 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Columbus Square Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule III to the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the WFRBS 2014-C22 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Grapevine Mills Mortgage Loan and the 17 State Street Mortgage Loan, which are being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit AA to the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the JPMBB 2014-C23 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Hilton Houston Post Oak Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit AA to the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the JPMBB 2014-C25 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART IV