UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182019
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-191331-11
Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity: 0001656839
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GS1
(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in its charter)
Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001004158
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
(exact name of the depositor as specified in its charter)
Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541502
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company
(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)
Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001558761
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.
(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)
New York the issuing entity) | 38-3984605 38-3984606 38-7143656 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Numbers) |
c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as Certificate Administrator
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD
(Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity)
21045
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(212) 902-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes ⌧ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes ⌧ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ⌧ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Not applicable.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Not applicable.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer ⌧ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o
Emerging growth company o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes ⌧ No
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Not applicable.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. o Yes o No
Not applicable.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Not applicable.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
Not applicable.
EXPLANATORY NOTES
The South Plains MallWestin Boston Waterfront Mortgage Loan, the Westin Boston WaterfrontSouth Plains Mall Mortgage Loan, the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan and the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 8.5%, 8.5%, 7.3% and 3.3%, respectively, of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date, are each an asset of the issuing entity and are each part of a loan combination that includes (a) with respect to the South Plains MallWestin Boston Waterfront Mortgage Loan which is an asset of the issuing entity and two other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity, (b) with respect to the Westin Boston WaterfrontSouth Plains Mall Mortgage Loan which is an asset of the issuing entity and two other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity, (c) with respect to the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan which is an asset of the issuing entity and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity orand (d) with respect to the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan which is an asset of the issuing entity and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity. These loan combinations, including the South Plains MallWestin Boston Waterfront Mortgage Loan, the Westin Boston WaterfrontSouth Plains Mall Mortgage Loan, the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan and the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan, are being serviced and administered pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The responsibilities of Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of each of these loan combinations with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to these loan combinations.
The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 5.5% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and three other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33 transaction, Commission File Number 333-189017-11 (the “CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction. The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction. Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.
The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 2.4% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan and two other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GC34 transaction, Commission File Number 333-191331-10 (the “GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction. The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction. Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.
The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 12.2% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan and two other pari passu loans and one subordinate companion loan, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the GS Mortgage Securities Corporation Trust 2015-590M transaction (the “GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction”). This loan combination, including the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the trust and servicing agreement for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction. The responsibilities of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as primary servicer of this loan combination with respect to the issuing entity, are subsumed within its responsibilities as master servicer under the trust and servicing agreement for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction. Thus, the servicer compliance statement provided by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under such trust and servicing agreement, encompasses its roles as both master servicer and primary servicer with respect to this loan combination.
The Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect to the Element LA Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 8.5% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The Element LA Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Element LA Mortgage Loan and two other pari passu loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. Thisentity.This loan combination, including the Element LA Mortgage Loan, was serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the issuing entity prior to the closing of the securitization of a pari passu portion of the Element LA loan combination in the CFCRE 2016-C3 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number 333-207567-01 (the “CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction”). After the closing of the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction on January 28, 2016, this loan combination, including the Element LA Mortgage Loan was, and will continue to be, serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement with respect to the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/
The master servicer of a Newmark Knight Frank ispooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as the primary servicer of the Element LA Mortgage Loanrelated mortgage loans serviced and administered pursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identified herein. If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, the servicer compliance statement provided by the master servicer under any such agreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of the pooling and servicing agreement for the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction.related mortgage loan or mortgage loans.
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCWells Fargo Bank, National Association is the masterspecial servicer of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the specialprimary servicer of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan prior to July 5, 2018.Loan. As a result, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCWells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements delivered by Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCWells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.
LNR Partners, LLC is the special servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the special servicer of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan on and after July 5, 2018.Loan. These mortgage loans constitute more than 5%, but less than 10%, of the pool assets of the issuing entity. Therefore, the Depositor included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria for LNR Partners, LLC and an accountants’ attestation report pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB because LNR Partners, LLC is servicing more than 5% of the pool assets. However, the Depositor is not required to include in this Annual Report on Form 10-K a servicer compliance statement pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of LNR Partners, LLC because LNR Partners, LLC is an unaffiliated servicer servicing less than 10% of pool assets.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the special servicer and certificate administrator of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the primary servicer and certificate administrator of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, the certificate administrator of the Element LA Mortgage Loan and the primary servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan. As a result, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.
Wilmington Trust, National Association acts as trustee of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan and the Element LA Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the trust and servicing agreement for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction and the pooling and servicing agreement for the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified in the transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trustee did not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB. The master servicer or the special servicer, to the extent required, performed the servicing function identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and each such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountant’s attestation report for the subject transaction. As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria of the trustee. One or more other servicers of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan and the Element LA Mortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. and National Tax Search, LLC. These entities were engaged by the primary servicer of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, and the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan and the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan to remit tax payments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxing authorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, and to verify non-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are included within the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB. Therefore, under the principles-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, these vendors are “servicers” for the purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. See Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).
The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicer compliance statements of the certificate administrator of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, the Element LA Mortgage Loan, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement does not perform any activities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entity and because they are each not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.
With respect to the pari passu loan combinationcombinations that includesinclude the Element LA Mortgage Loan, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan (i) the report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria and attestation report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria of U.S. Bank National Association as trustee certificate administrator and custodian of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as operating advisor of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as they are not required to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation AB because they are parties performing activities that address servicing criteria relating to 5% or less of the assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) the report on assessmentservicer compliance statements of compliance with servicing criteria and attestation report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria of CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer of the Element LA Mortgage Loan, LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and as special servicer of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan on and after July 5, 2018, Citibank, N.A.,CWCapital Asset Management LLC as certificate administratorspecial servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and U.S. Bank National Association, as certificate administrator of the DoubleTree Hotel UniversalElement LA Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as they are not required by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K because they are each an unaffiliated party that is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.
PART I
Item 1. Business.
Omitted.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Omitted.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Omitted.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Omitted.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Omitted.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Omitted.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Omitted.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Omitted.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Omitted.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Omitted.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Omitted.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Omitted.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Omitted.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Omitted.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Omitted.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Omitted.
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB
Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.
The 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (Control Number 1 on Annex A of the prospectus supplement of the registrant relating to the issuing entity filed on December 1, 2015 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item 1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement. In accordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited net operating income of the significant obligor was $45,420,745$46,789,870.00 for the twelve–twelve month period ended December 31, 2018.2019.
Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.
Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.
The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routine litigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and the following, with respect to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as custodian and as trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator and custodian, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee and custodian, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator and custodian:custodian.
Since June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors have filed civil complaints in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, and later the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. The complaints against Wells Fargo Bank alleged that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserted causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's alleged failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought included money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. Wells Fargo Bank has reached an agreement, in which it denies any wrongdoing, to resolve these claims on a classwide basis for the 271 RMBS trusts currently at issue. The settlement agreement is subject to court approval. Separate lawsuits against Wells Fargo Bank making similar allegations filed by certain other institutional investors concerning 57 RMBS trusts in New York federal and state court are not covered by the agreement. With respect to the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts.
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain RMBS trusts.
On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNY Case”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRock California Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018 and the BlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.
On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’s Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see(see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 1, 2020, both motions for summary judgment have been briefed and are awaiting decision by the court.
On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 1, 2020, both motions for summary judgment have been briefed and are awaiting decision by the court.
On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts. As of March 1, 2019,2020, DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss has been briefed and is awaiting decision by the court.
It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under the related servicing agreement for this transaction.
In the ordinary course of business, Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) is involved in a number of legal proceedings, including in connection with its role as trustee of certain RMBS transactions. Certain of these Citibank as trustee-related matters are disclosed herein.
OnBeginning on June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed civil action was filed against Citibankcomplaints in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, by a group of investors in 48 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee, asserting claims for purported violations ofNew York County, and later the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the “Trust Indenture Act”), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on Citibank’s alleged failure to perform its duties as trustee for the 48 RMBS trusts. On November 24, 2014, plaintiffs sought leave to withdraw this action. On the same day, a smaller subset of similar plaintiff investors in 27 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee, filed a new civil action against Citibank in the United StatesU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting similar claims as the prior action filed in state court. In January 2015, the court closed plaintiffs’ original state court action. On September 8, 2015, the federal court dismissed all claims as to 24 of the 27 trusts and allowed certain of the claims to proceed as to the other three trusts. Subsequently, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims with respect to two of the three trusts. On April 7, 2017, Citibank filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs filed its consolidated opposition brief and cross motion for partial summary judgment on May 22, 2017. Briefing on those motions was completed on August 4, 2017. On March 22, 2018, the court granted Citibank’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety, denied Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and ordered the clerk to close the case. On April 20, 2018, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal. Plaintiffs’ opening brief was filed on August 3, 2018. Citibank filed its opposition on November 2, 2018. Plaintiffs’ filed their reply on November 16, 2018.
On November 24, 2015, the same investors that brought the federal case brought a new civil action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York related to 25 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee. This case includes the 24 trusts previously dismissed in the federal action, and one additional trust. The investors assert claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of New York’s Streit Act (the “Streit Act”). Following oral argument on Citibank’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on August 5, 2016. On June 27, 2017, the state court issued a decision, dismissing the Event of Default claims, mortgage-file-related claims, the fiduciary duty claims, and the conflict of interest claims. The decision sustained certain breach of contract claims including the claim alleging discovery of breaches of representations and warranties, a claim related to robo-signing, and the implied covenant of good faith claim. Citibank appealed the lower court’s decision, and on January 16, 2018, the Appellate Division, First Department, dismissed the claims related to robo-signing and the implied covenant of good faith, but allowed plaintiffs’ claim alleging discovery of breaches of representations and warranties to proceed.
On August 19, 2015, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporationagainst Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“FDIC”) as Receiver for a failed financial institution filed a civil action against Citibank in the Southern District of New York. This action relates to one private-label RMBS trust for which Citibank formerly served as trustee. FDIC asserts claims for breach of contract, violation of the Streit Act, and violation of the Trust Indenture Act. Citibank jointly briefed a motion to dismiss with The Bank of New York Mellon and U.S. Bank, N.A., entities that have also been sued by FDIC in their capacity as trustee, and these cases have all been consolidated in front of Judge Carter. On September 30, 2016, the Court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On October 14, 2016, FDIC filed a motion for reargument or relief from judgment from the Court’s dismissal order. On July 11, 2017, Judge Carter ruled on the motion for reconsideration regarding his dismissal of the action. He denied reconsideration of his decision on standing, but granted leave to amend the complaint by October 9, 2017. The FDIC subsequently requested an extension of time to file its amended complaint, which was granted. The FDIC filed its amended complaint on December 8, 2017. Defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on March 13, 2018. On April 18, 2018, plaintiff filed its opposition. Defendants filed their joint reply on May 3, 2018.
There can be no assurances as to the outcome of litigation or the possible impact of litigation on the trustee or the RMBS trusts. However, Citibank denies liability and continues to vigorously defend against these litigations. Furthermore, neither the above-disclosed litigations nor any other pending legal proceeding involving Citibank will materially affect Citibank’s ability to perform its duties under the related servicing agreement for this CMBS transaction.
Since 2014 various plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs, primarily investors, have filed claims against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S.Wells Fargo Bank”), in its capacity as trustee or successor trustee (as the case may be) underfor certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. The plaintiffs or plaintiff groups have filed substantially similar complaints against other RMBS trustees, including DeutscheWells Fargo Bank Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo. The complaints against U.S. Bank allegealleged that the trustee caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers for these RMBS trusts and assertasserted causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's purportedalleged failure toto: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for allegedpurported breaches of representations and warranties, concerning loan quality. The complaints also assert that the trustee failed to(ii) notify securityholdersinvestors of purportedalleged events of default, allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers and that the trustee purportedly failed to(iii) abide by a heightened standardappropriate standards of care following alleged events of default.
Currently U.S.Relief sought included money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. In November 2018, Wells Fargo Bank isreached an agreement, in which it denied any wrongdoing, to resolve such claims on a defendantclasswide basis for the 271 RMBS trusts at issue. On May 6, 2019, the court entered an order approving the settlement agreement. Separate lawsuits against Wells Fargo Bank making similar allegations filed by certain other institutional investors concerning several RMBS trusts in multiple actions alleging individual or class action claims againstNew York federal and state court are not covered by the trustee withagreement. With respect to multiple trusts as described above. Previously, U.S.such litigations, Wells Fargo Bank disclosed thatbelieves plaintiffs' claims are without merit and intends to contest the most substantial case was: BlackRock Balanced Capital Portfolio et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, No. 605204/2015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (class action alleging claims with respect to approximately 770 trusts) and its companion case BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio et al v. U.S Bank National Association, No. 14-cv-9401 (S.D.N.Y.) (collectively, the “BlackRock cases”). U.S. Bank has entered into a settlement agreement that will resolve the BlackRock cases following approval of the dismissals by the applicable court. Some of the trusts implicated in the aforementioned Blackrock cases, as well as other trusts, are involved in actions brought by separate groups of plaintiffs related tovigorously, but there can be no more than 100 trusts per case.
U.S. Bank cannot assure youassurances as to the outcome of any of the litigation,litigations or the possible impact of thesethe litigations on the trusteeWells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts. However, U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in. good faith, that its actions were not the cause of losses to investors and that it has meritorious defenses, and it intends to contest the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously.
Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information regarding this Item has been previously provided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuing entity filed on December 1, 2015 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).
Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.
The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit O to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).
The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit O to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the CGCMT 2015-GC33 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).
The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit O to the pooling and servicing agreement for the GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the GSMS 2015-GC34 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).
The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the trust and servicing agreement for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit L to the trust and servicing agreement for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the GSMSC 2015-590M Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).
The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the Element LA Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the CFCRE 2016-C3 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).
The report on assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria furnished pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB by Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank National Association (“Midland”) discloses that a material instance of noncompliance occurred, as described below:
Material Instance of Noncompliance
In certain instances, the Schedule AL Files (Item 1125 of Regulation AB) were not reported in accordance with the terms specified in the transaction agreements, in conflict with Item 1122(d)(3)(i): “Reports to investors, including those to be filed with the Commission, are maintained in accordance with the transaction agreements and applicable Commission requirements. Specifically, such reports: (A) Are prepared in accordance with timeframes and other terms set forth in the transaction agreements”. The noncompliance consisted of omitted or inaccurately reported numbersfields as described in (1) and (2) below. (1) In connection with other enhancements Midland made to its manual Schedule AL process, starting in April 2019, Midland developed and implemented new Schedule AL reporting templates for each applicable CMBS transaction that closed prior to April 2019 and for each applicable CMBS transaction going forward. Related to this, Midland made certain template setup errors, along with related and other manual inputting of information errors, and the errors were not identified prior to submission of the applicable Schedule AL Files in certain cases due to breakdowns in quality control. (2) In one applicable transaction, the following: (1)related Schedule AL File for a given month was not saved properly resulting in the initial setup files contained information atprior month's Schedule AL File being submitted for the asset level, and Midland was required to manually compilegiven month instead of the information to present it at the loan level as required bycorrect Schedule AL; and (2) certain reporting requirements required manual processing by Midland, including the use of various data computation formulas, quality control checks and analysis.AL File.
The identified instances did not involve the servicing of assets included in this securitization.
Steps Taken to Remedy the Material Instance of Noncompliance
Midland’s Schedule AL reporting process was enhanced in April of 2019, however, the process remained manual throughout the 2019 calendar year. Errors relating to certain Schedule AL Files during 2019 were identified during the related audit. Following identification, Midland made staffing changes and additional enhancements and improvements to its processes and procedures to support its Schedule AL reporting obligations and expects to move to an automated solution for this process.
Midland is currently remediating the Schedule AL reporting for certain of the CMBS transactions found to be incorrect, and will be making improvements to its systems, processes and procedures to support its Schedule AL reporting obligations.
The report on assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria furnished pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB by CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”) discloses that a material instance of noncompliance occurred, as described below:
Material Instance of Noncompliance:
1122(d)(2)(vii): “Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations: (A) are mathematically accurate; (B) are prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements; (C) are reviewed and approved by someone other than the person who prepared the reconciling items; and (D) contain explanations for reconciling items. These reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements.”
The instance of material noncompliance, for the reporting period included a failure to complete the required bank reconciliations within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date. In five of the twelve months related to the reporting period, the required reconciliations were not completed within the 30 calendar days requirement as follows:
February 2018: bank reconciliations were prepared on June 22, 2018
March 2018: bank reconciliations were prepared on May 1, 2018
September 2018: bank reconciliations were prepared on November 6, 2018
November 2018: bank reconciliations were prepared on February 19, 2019
December 2018: bank reconciliations were prepared on February 6, 2019
The identified instances did not involve the servicing of assets included in this securitization.
Steps Taken to Remedy the Material Instance of Noncompliance
In response to the lack of adherence to company policy and procedures, CWCAM’s Compliance Committee reviewed the reasons for noncompliance and added two additional procedures to supplement its existing procedures:
1) the accounting department has added the completion of bank account reconciliations within 30 calendar days to its monthly closing checklist, which is reviewed and signed off by a CWCAM officer; and
2) the Chief Financial Officer has set up a monthly electronic reminder requiring that the completed bank reconciliations be forwarded to the CFO for an additional layer of review.
incorrect.
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.
The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable
(3) See below
31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.
33 Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
33.1 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
33.2 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer
33.3 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.4 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator
33.5 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian
33.6 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor
33.9 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the South Plains Mall Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.1233.11 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the South Plains Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.1533.14 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Westin Boston Waterfront Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.2133.19 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.2433.21 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.2733.24 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.3033.26 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.3233.28 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan
33.34 Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan
33.4133.35 U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Certificate Administrator and Custodian of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.4233.36 Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.4633.40 AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan
33.4733.41 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.5333.46 CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Element LA Mortgage Loan
33.5433.47 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Element LA Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.5733.49 Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Element LA Mortgage Loan
34 Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
34.1 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
34.2 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer
34.3 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.4 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator
34.5 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian
34.6 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor
34.9 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the South Plains Mall Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.1234.11 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the South Plains Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.1534.14 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Westin Boston Waterfront Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.2134.19 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.2434.21 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Glenbrook Square Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.2734.24 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.3034.26 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the GSA Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.3234.28 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan
34.34 Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan
34.4134.35 U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Certificate Administrator and Custodian of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.4234.36 Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.4634.40 AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan
34.4734.41 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.5334.46 CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Element LA Mortgage Loan
34.5434.47 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Element LA Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.5734.49 Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Element LA Mortgage Loan
35 Servicer compliance statements.
35.1 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
35.2 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer
35.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator
35.1735.13 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
35.18 Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
35.2135.15 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan on and after July 5, 2018. (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
35.22 U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator of the DoubleTree Hotel Universal Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
35.2435.17 AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer of the 590 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan
35.2735.19 CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Element LA Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
(b) The exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.
(c) Not Applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
(Depositor)
/s/ Leah Nivison
Leah Nivison, Chief Executive Officer
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Date: March 25, 20192020