UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


(Mark One)

[X]ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year endedMay 31, 2009
2010

or

[   ]TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to________________

Commission file numbernumber:  000-52951


HERE ENTERPRISES, INC.

(NameExact name of small business issuerregistrant as specified in its charter)


NevadaN/A

Nevada

27-2208420

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2908 – 30 Harrison Garden

848 N. Rainbow Blvd., #2952, Las Vegas, NV

89107

Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM2N 7A9

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Issuer’s telephone number,

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code(416) 704-0105code:

(830) 393-9398


Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

NoneN/A
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered


Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

N/A

N/A


Securities registered pursuant tounder Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:


Common Stock

(Title of class)


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes  [  ] Yes    [X]  No [X]


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes  [  ]  Yes     [X]  No [X]


Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  [X]  NoYes  [   ]  No


Indicate by check markcheckmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T


- 2 -

(§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files).Yesfiles.)  [  ]  Yes    [x]  No [   ]

(Not required)





Indicate by check mark if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuantin response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter)
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporatedincorporation by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.[X]  ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer

[  ]

Accelerated filer

[  ]

Non-accelerated filer

[  ]

(Do (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

[X]x]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [X]    No  [  ]  Yes   [X ]  No


State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed
by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such
common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
$9,065,000 (computed by reference to0.00.  Registrant trades on the closing pricepink sheets under the symbol HRTE.  The only trades of $3.50the issuer’s stock occurred with the sale of 1,000 shares at $2.02 per share on September 8, 2009)June 1, 2010, 1,000 shares at $1.50 on April 21, 2010, and 100 shares at $1.50 per share on December 3, 2009.

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the
latest practicable date:8,190,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of August 27, 2009September 29, 2010.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I,
Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or
information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933.
The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders
for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).Not applicable.


- 3 -

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 below, that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this annual report.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock. As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Here Enterprises, Inc. and/or Here Network Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Here Enterprises, Inc.

PART I


Item 1.  Business.Business


Corporate History


We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 15, 2006.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia on December 12, 2006.  We commenced business operations with the acquisition of dinehere.ca on December 12, 2006.

On August 1, 2008,Through our subsidiary, Here Network Corp. incorporated in British Columbia, we operated a website dining guide at www.dinehere.ca called Dine Here.  The website contained restaurant listings for British Columbia including Greater Vancouver, Victoria and Conversational Computing Corporation, a private Washington state based corporation, signed a letter of intent for our company to acquire Conversational Computing Corporation through a share exchange. If the transactions contemplated by the letter of intent were completed, Conversational Computing Corporation would have become our wholly owned subsidiary. This letter of intent expired and we are not pursuing these transactions.Whistler.  

On May 15, 2009, we, certain significant shareholders of our company, and Magnolia Solar, Inc., entered into a memorandum of understanding with respect to the potential acquisition by Magnolia of a majority interest in our company.  The memorandum of understanding contemplates that pursuant to a mutually satisfactory definitive agreement between the parties, Magnolia willwould acquire a majority interest in the issued and outstanding common stock of our companyCompany from our companyCompany and certain significant shareholders of our companyCompany for $300,000.  The purchase price of $300,000 iswas contemplated to be raised by Midtown Partners as part of its $1,500,000 bridge funding.

The partiesIn June 2009, we entered into a letter agreement with Magnolia, pursuant to which Magnolia agreed to use their best effortswire us $20,000, upon the execution of the letter agreement, which amount was to negotiatebe utilized by us solely for expenses related to the completion of the audit of our financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009. In addition, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the memorandum of understanding, $20,000 was to be applied as a credit against the purchase price for the controlling interest in good faithour company as contemplated by the memorandum of understanding. If such transactions failed to close on or before August 31, 2009 or such later date as agreed by Magnolia and us, through no fault of our company, $20,000 was to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to us. If we or our majority shareholders, for any reason, determined not to proceed with such transactions upon being presented with the definitive merger agreement, which is contemplated$20,000 was to contain, among other things,be immediately due and payable to Magnolia within 10 days of being presented with the following provisions: (i) atdefinitive agreement. We extended the closing date to December 15, 2009.

On October 15, 2009, Magnolia will own a majorityadvanced our company $15,000 of $20,000 contemplated under the fully diluted shares of our common stock,letter agreement. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the memorandum of understanding that post-bridge funding,and we consider $15,000 from Magnolia will hold approximately 85%as a “break up” fee. Accordingly, we recognized $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations for the nine-month period ended February 28, 2010. Management does not expect our company to receive from Magnolia the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the letter agreement.

On April 9, 2010, we sold all of the issued and outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. The certain significant shareholdersstock of our company will sell their shares as part of this transaction and new shares will be issued from authorized, leaving a total post-transaction capitalization to be finalized between the parties, in good faith, in the definitive agreement; (ii) we will eliminate all liabilities from our balance sheet and have no ongoing operations as of the closing date; (iii) we will deliver to Magnolia fiscal years 2007 and 2008 audits by an accounting firm accredited with the PCAOB and a member of the SEC practice section; (iv) we will deliver to Magnolia certified transfer sheets


- 4 -

(or make same available through the transfer agent) as well as all corporate books and records and support documents for the audits; and (v) all officers and employees will resign from our company in all current capacities, with no further compensation due under their existing employment agreement.

There is no assurance that we will be able to complete the transactions as contemplated above, or on terms acceptable to our company.

Current Business

Through our subsidiary Here Network Corp. incorporated in British Columbia, we operate a website dining guide at www.dinehere.ca called Dine Here. The website contains restaurant listings for British Columbia including Greater Vancouver, Victoria and Whistler. Visitors can view restaurant information for manyto the founders of the restaurantsCompany, in exchange for the return of 5,600,000 shares of Here Enterprises common stock, which shares were then assigned and delivered to others.

On September 9, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to become the sole shareholder of ABS Land Company, Inc.  and Cycle Ranch Inc., and the owner of 99% limited partnership interest of Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd. making them wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.  Cycle Ranch Inc. is the managing partner of Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd., which operates a motocross park near Floresville, Texas.  ASB owns land which it leases to Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd. for its operations.  Collectively, the entities will be referred to hereinafter as Cycle Ranch.

The Agreement is also subject to the guarantee of a promissory note issued to the original seller of the stock of the Target Companies in the cities covered including user contributed reviews that have a title, descriptionamount of their experience$640,000, with interest at 6% per annum and ratings for categories including food, service, ambiance and an overall rating. Internet visitors can also register at the website and submit reviews on any restaurant or add new restaurant listings.dated

Registration is not required to view any


February 5. 2010, which requires payment of the web pages on Dine Here, only to submit reviews or restaurant listings. Membership on Dine Here is free; anyone can register an account and become a user of the website. In order to add reviews or restaurant listings, registration is required. Registration involves filling in a form$6,063 per month, with the requested username, password, locationbalance due in full on August 30, 2012.

Current and email address.Anticipated Business

Cycle Ranch

Cycle Ranch operates a motocross race track located in Floresville, Texas. They have 108 acres of red dirt and oak trees.  The locationmain track is displayed along with your username withapproximately 1.7 miles long and 30 feet wide and is prepped every review submitted using that profile. After a user registers with Dine Here, a confirmation email is sent to the email address supplied. In order to complete the registration, a link contained within the registration email must be clicked on which verifies that the email address supplied is valid. Once this final step is completed, the new user can login to the website and submit reviews or new restaurant listings.

For each restaurant listing, Dine Here displays contact information including the restaurant name, address, telephone number and website address (if available). Each restaurant is classified by the price range of meals, the cuisine type they serve and whether they accept reservations.weekend for races.  There is also a map linkjunior beginner track located behind the main race track.  Facilities also include bathrooms, covered pavilions with picnic tables, covered grandstands that the user can click on that sends the visitor to Google Maps, an external website. The address of the restaurant is passed to Google Mapsseat 800 people, a bike wash, and a map is displayed containing an image of the geographical location of the restaurant. If the restaurant is associated with other restaurants such as being part of a restaurant chain, links to those restaurant listings are displayed.

Registered users on Dine Here can submit reviews on any restaurant listing. These reviews include the following required information: review title, review description, overall rating, food rating, service rating, and ambiance rating. Each of the ratings is based on a one to five scale; one representing a poor experience and five being incredible. Reviews must be associated with a restaurant and include all of the above information. Once submitted, the review is postedbike shop.  More details on the site immediately which is displayed as the first review on the associated restaurant listing web pagetrack, facilities and the main Dine Here home page. The 25 most recent reviews are displayed on Dine Here’s home page.events can be viewed at www.cycleranchmx.com.

Every restaurant that has at least one review has an overall rating based on the average review rating given by Dine Here users. When a new review is submitted by a user, this overall rating is modified based on the new average of all review ratings supplied. This rating information is displayed at the top of every restaurant listing.

Every review and restaurant listing submitted to Dine Here is displayed immediately on the website. Despite this fact, every review and restaurant listing is moderated and reviewed by Dine Here staff. Dine Here has a review and restaurant listing submission policy that must be followed in order for the submission to remain on the website. All submissions on Dine Here must conform to the following standards:


- 5 -

Failure to conform to the above submission policy will result in the review or restaurant listing being removed. All user submissions are generally moderated within one to two business days, but based on traffic levels, moderation of submissions can sometimes take up to a week.

We are currently developing a new website for Dine Here that will have a new design and will use community based software called Drupal. Drupal is an open sourced software package that simplifies the process of creating a community driven website by providing a basic, common framework with features that most community based websites require. The software also allows customization and feature addition with a module system that simplifies this process.

The next version of the website, Dine Here 2.0, will replicate all current functionality of the site. In addition, it will support the following new features:

The new logo and design for Dine Here 2.0 was completed by Pixelsplitter Design at a cost of CDN$2,000. A portion of the software development and customization for the new website was performed by As If Productions. We paid As If Productions a total $1,650 on January 30, 2007, representing half of their quotation for services. We were unhappy with the quality of their work and verbally terminated our agreement with As If Productions on June 1, 2007. We subsequently retained Wickle Media Corp of Vancouver who will complete the development for $2,000, to be paid in full upon completion, currently estimated to be August 31, 2009. The useful life of the new website and software is expected to be 3 years.

Current and Anticipated Sources of Revenue

Cycle Ranch

Currently, Cycle Ranch generates revenues from two separate sources.  Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd. generates revenues from the operation of its BMX race track through practice session fees, race event fees, camping fees, special event fees, the bike wash and sales from the bike shop.  Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd. pays a fee to lease the land on which the track is located to ASB Land Management, Inc., which is ASB’s only source of revenue.  Cycle Ranch, Inc. currently only serves as general partner of Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd.

Competition

Cycle Ranch

We currently have one sourcecompete regionally nationally with other speedway owners to sponsor events.  We compete for spectator interest with all forms of revenue that consistsprofessional and amateur spring, summer and fall sports, and with a wide range of Google Adsense advertisements. With the development of the new website, we willother available entertainment and recreational activities, conducted in and near Floresville, San Antonio, and Austin, Texas, and regionally and nationally.  These competing events or activities may be adding a new source of revenue offering direct advertising to businesses.

Google Adsense is an advertising solution for web publishers such as Dine Here. The web publisher agrees to place text ads on their website in return for a 50-50 split of all revenue derived from the advertising placedheld on the website.

Revenue is accrued when visitors click on ads on a pay per click basis. Google Adsense has a sophisticated, contextual ad serving system that allows them to target ads on Dine Here to serve only those that relate geographically or match the theme of the website. Advertisers using Google Adsense generally include local newspapers, phone book companies, restaurants, other local businesses or anyone else that pays for this marketing service. The ads are served within the text-based content of the site and can include up to 3 ads depending on the web page. Google Adsense pays its publishers by corporate check on a monthly basis at the end of the month, for the previous month. This is paid in US dollars and delivered by mail.

With the new version of the website (Dine Here 2.0), we will continue to serve Google Adsense ads. They will be embedded within the textual content of the website suchsame days as between each user review on the restaurant listing pages. Embedding Google Adsense ads within the content often derives the highest possible revenue because the ads are integrated into the content and incite the highest click rates.our events.  We will reserve traditional advertising space such as at the top of the page for Dine Here’s direct advertising.

Direct Feature Ads

Direct advertising will be primarily marketed to local businesses with the launch of Dine Here 2.0. It will include the ability for advertisers to pay for and setup advertisements on Dine Here. The advertising will work differently than


- 6 -

Google Adsense. Instead of being based on performance using a pay per click model, they will be impression-based and charged on the number of times they are displayed. Advertisers will pay per CPM (cost per thousand) impressions displayed on the website.

Each city will be broken up into blocks of 50,000 impressions or 50 CPMs. We expect to charge approximately US$5 per CPM. The minimum monthly cost for each advertiser will be $250 which is based on a $5 CPM multiplied by the minimum ad buy of 50,000 impressions. If Dine Here is unable to deliver the necessary ad impressions to fulfill advertising commitments, the advertising will be rolled over to the next month and added to that months sold inventory.

Advertisers will be able to create two types of ads: graphical or text based. They can create the text based ad or upload an image to use for their graphical ad. Once the advertisement has been created, they will be able to type in a URL or website address that the visitor will be sent when clicking on the ad. Finally, the advertiser will be able to select which city or cities that they want to advertise on and how many blocks of 50,000 impressions (50 CPMs) they would like to purchase. We will require a 3 month minimum commitment. Online payments will be accepted by major credit cards or bank transfer using Paypal. Alternatively, we will accept a corporate check as payment.

Once the payment has been received and the advertisement has been approved, we will begin serving the ads.

Advertisers will have a browser-based web interface that allows them to update their advertisements, add new advertisements and view statistics of their current and past advertisement’s performance.

We use PayPal to handle payment transactions from advertisers. PayPal handles the credit card transactions and also delivers payment receipts and user information via e-mail instantly after purchase. Paypal charges the following fees based on the gross monthly transaction amount:

$0 - $3,000:2.9% of transaction amount plus $0.30 transaction fee
$3,001 - $10,000:2.5% of transaction amount plus $0.30 transaction fee
$10,001 - $100,000:2.2% of transaction amount plus $0.30 transaction fee

All amounts above shown in US dollars

Marketing

Dine Here relies on organic search engine traffic and word of mouth for nearly all of its website traffic. Dine Here is listed in all major search engines and directories including Google, Yahoo, DMOZ, MSN and Ask. Due to the nature of the site with constantly changing content, the website is ranked well for all related keywords associated with the website such as “Vancouver restaurants” or a specific restaurant name that is listed on the website. We rely on this high placement for the majority of traffic that is received at Dine Here. There are no plans for any online marketing expenditures in the next 12 months. To increase traffic to Dine Here, we are focusing on increasing the content of its website by expanding to new cities and offering restaurant listings in those new areas.

Technology

Our current website was developed from scratch using active server pages scripting technology. The new website (Dine Here 2.0) is based on an open sourced software package called Drupal which is available free of charge. The website has several customizations to the software called modules which are proprietary to Dine Here and that Here Network Corp retains copyright to. The new website is expected to be a significant improvement because rather than being a custom solution, it is using a commercial-grade software package that will be upgraded and maintained at no cost for software maintenance. Drupal is maintained by a community of thousands of developers and users who are constantly making major feature enhancements and bug fixes. This alleviates a significant portion of the development costs required to maintain the software running Dine Here other than costs associated with integration ofpromote outdoor motorsports events.  Weather conditions surrounding these new software versions into the website.


- 7 -

The website is hosted on a dedicated server rented to Here Network Corp. on a month to month basis by Superb Internet Corporation. Superb charges a monthly fee of $282.45. The server is hosted in Seattle, Washington.

Competition

There are a significant number of competitors that offer restaurant information and reviews on dining establishments in Canada. As we expand across Canada, we will face new competition as all major cities have a local dining guide for that region. In addition, there are several travel based websites that will also offer stiff competition to Dine Here.

CompetitorTypeDescriptionAdvertising Rates
The Vancouver Restaurant Guide (vancouverrestaurantguide.net)Local guideA Vancouver local dining guide with no reviews and links to restaurantsAnnual listing fee of CDN$199
Food Vancouver, Food Ontario (foodvancouver.com, foodontario.com)Local, regional dining guidesVancouver based dining guides with sister site for OntarioCharges annual fee for listing restaurant ranging from free - $400 per year for a deluxe listing
Fodor’s Travel Guide (fodors.com)Travel guideWorldwide travel guide with restaurant listings reviewed by professional reviewersAdvertising based website, restaurant must be reviewed by in-house reviewers to be added.
Where Guide (where.ca)Entertainment guideCanadian shopping, dining and entertainment guideAdvertising based website, restaurant must be reviewed by in-house reviewers to be added.
Yahoo Travel (travel.yahoo.com)Travel GuideWorldwide travel guideAdvertising based website, reviews accepted from public

Growth Strategy

Our growth strategy involves organic growth by adding new cities to our dining website directory. Over the next 12 months, we plan on adding 3 new cities including Calgary, Toronto and Montreal. As we add each city, we plan to hire a local sales representative to assist with localevents affect sales of advertising in that region.tickets, concessions and souvenirs, among other things.  

Our goal is to increase monthly page views to 4 million per month within the next 12 months.

Employees

Our President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director, Simon Au, isMark K. Ryun, and our Chief Financial Officer, Michael T. Moore, are the only employee of our company. He handlesCompany.  They handle all of the responsibilities in the area of corporate administration, business development and research.

When we expand to a new city, we will be hiring a commission based sales person for that city to assist in local ad sales.  This is a part time position which pays 50% commission for all ad sales in that city.

Intellectual Property

We own the domain names dinehere.ca and dinehere.com. All content on the website including restaurant and reviews are considered copyright. Although Dine Here 2.0 is based on Drupal, an open source software package, it also includes custom modules which are proprietary to Dine Here and that Here Network Corp. owns the copyright to.


- 8 -

We are not aware that our services or proprietary rights infringe the proprietary rights of third parties.  However, from time to time, we may receive notices from third parties asserting that we have infringed their trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property rights.  In addition, we may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights.  Any such claims could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause service stoppages or lead us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements rather than disputing the merits of such claims.  An adverse outcome in litigation or similar proceedings could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require expenditure of significant resources to develop non-infringing technology and




opportunities, require disputed rights to be licensed from others, or require us to cease the marketing or use of our website, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.


REPORTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS

We filed a Prospectus as part of a Form S-1, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and will file reports, including quarterly and annual reports, with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Exchange Act.  These reports and any other materials filed with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  The Company files its reports electronically with the SEC.  The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.  The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors


In addition to other information in this annual report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently consider to be immaterial, may also impact our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any such risks occur, our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially affected in an adverse manner. Under such circumstances, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.Not applicable.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our limited operating history makes evaluation of our business difficult.

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 15, 2006 and our wholly owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia on December 12, 2006. We commenced business operations with the acquisition of dinehere.ca on December 12, 2006. Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects. We have encountered, and expect to continue to encounter, many of the difficulties and uncertainties frequently encountered by early stage companies, including limited capital, delays in product development, marketing and sales obstacles and delays, inability to gain customer acceptance of our products and services, inability to attract and retain high-quality and talented executives and other personnel and significant competition. We cannot be certain that we will successfully address these risks. If we are unable to address these risks, our business may not grow, our stock price may suffer and/or we may be unable to stay in business.

The fact that we have not generated any significant revenues since our incorporation raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have not generated significant revenues since our inception on November 15, 2006. Since we are still in the early stages of an operating company and because of the lack of operating history, we will, in all likelihood, continue to incur operating expenses without significant revenues until our website gains significant popularity. Our primary source of funds has been the sale of our common stock and promissory note. We cannot assure that we will be able to generate enough interest in our website. If we cannot attract a significant customer base, we will not be able to generate any significant revenues or income. In addition, if we are unable to establish and generate material revenues, or obtain adequate future financing, our business will fail and you may lose some or all of your investment in our common stock.

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We incurred a net loss of $193,621 for the period from November 15, 2006 (date of inception) to May 31, 2009. On May 31, 2009, we had cash of $7,644. Should we require additional funding, we intend to raise the money required to fund our operations from the sale of our equity securities; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so. Because we have generated minimal revenues and have incurred a loss from operations since our inception,


- 9 -

our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their report dated August 4, 2009, regarding the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

We may need additional funding to support our operations and capital expenditures, which may not be available to us and which lack of availability could adversely affect our business.

We have no committed sources of additional capital. For the foreseeable future, we intend to fund our operations and capital expenditures from limited cash flow and our cash on hand. If our capital resources are insufficient, we will have to raise additional funds. We may need additional funds to continue our operations, pursue business opportunities (such as expansion, acquisitions of complementary business or the development of new products or services), to react to unforeseen difficulties or to respond to competitive pressures. There can be no assurance that any financing arrangements will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Furthermore, the sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities may result in further dilution to existing shareholders. If adequate additional funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate material parts of the implementation of our business strategy, including the possibility of additional acquisitions or internally developed businesses.

We may not be able to effectively manage our growth when we expand by adding new cities to our dining website directory.

We plan to add new cities to our dining website directory. Over the next 12 months, we plan on adding 3 new cities including Calgary, Toronto and Montreal. If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our financial results could be adversely affected. Growth may place a strain on our management systems and resources. We must continue to refine and expand our business development capabilities, our systems and processes and our access to financing sources. As we grow, we must continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:

If we are unable to manage our growth, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

We compete with many companies, some of whom are more established and better capitalized than us.

There are a significant number of competitors that offer restaurant information and reviews on dining establishments in Canada both through the Internet and in traditional markets. As we expand across Canada, we will face new competition as all major cities have a local dining guide for that region. In addition, there are several travel based websites that will also offer stiff competition to our website. Some of these companies are larger and better capitalized than us. There are also few barriers to entry in our markets and thus above average profit margins will likely attract additional competitors. Our competitors may develop services that are superior to, or have greater market acceptance than our services. For example, many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and larger customer bases than us. These factors may allow our competitors to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Our competitors may engage in more extensive research and development efforts, undertake more far-reaching marketing campaigns and adopt more aggressive pricing policies which may allow them to build larger registrant and membership bases. In addition, current and potential competitors are making, and are expected to continue to make, strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative, and in


- 10 -

some cases, exclusive relationships with significant companies or competitors to expand their businesses or to offer more comprehensive products and services. To the extent these competitors or potential competitors establish exclusive relationships with major portals, search engines and ISPs, our ability to reach potential users of our website through online advertising may be restricted. Failure to compete effectively including by developing and enhancing our services offerings would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and the trading price of our common stock.

If we are unable to establish a large user base, we may have difficulty in attracting advertisers to our website, which will hinder our ability to generate advertising revenues.

An integral part of our business plan and marketing strategy requires us to establish a large user base. We will only be able to attract advertisers to our website and possibly begin to generate significant revenues if we can obtain a large enough user base. The number of users necessary to attract advertisers will be determined through discussions with the potential advertisers and their input as to whether we can obtain revenues from advertisements based upon the total numbers at that time. If for any reason our website is ineffective at attracting consumers or if we are unable to continue to develop and update our website to keep consumers satisfied with our service, our user base may decrease and our ability to generate advertising revenues may decline.

Our market is characterized by rapid technological change, and if we fail to develop and market new technologies rapidly, we may not become profitable in the future.

The Internet and the online commerce industry are characterized by rapid technological change that could render our existing website obsolete. The development of our website entails significant technical and business risks. We can give no assurance that we will successfully use new technologies effectively or adapt our website to customer requirements or needs. If our management is unable, for technical, legal, financial, or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, we may never become profitable which may result in the loss of all or part of your investment.

We may face liability for information displayed on or accessible via our website, and for other content and commerce-related activities, which could reduce our net worth and working capital and increase our operating losses.

We could face claims for errors, defamation, negligence or copyright or trademark infringement based on the nature and content of information displayed on or accessible via our website, which could aversely affect our financial condition. Even to the extent that claims made against us do not result in liability, we may incur substantial costs in investigating and defending such claims.

We may be subject to liability based on statements made and actions taken as a result of participation in restaurant reviews and listings by our registered users. Based on links we provide to third-party websites, we could also be subject to claims based upon online content we do not control that is accessible from our website.

Our insurance, if any, may not cover all potential claims to which we are exposed or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liabilities that may be exposed. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage would reduce our net worth and working capital and increase our operating losses.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand.

Our trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and other intellectual property rights are important assets to us. There can be no assurance that the protections provided by these intellectual property rights will be adequate to prevent our competitors from misappropriating our technology or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. There are events that are outside our control that could pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. Additionally, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.


- 11 -

We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims in the future, which may be costly to defend, could require the payment of damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

Companies in the Internet, technology and media industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims increases. Our technologies may not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management resources and attention. An adverse determination also could prevent us from offering our products and services to others and may require that we procure substitute products or services for these members.

With respect to any intellectual property rights claim, we may have to pay damages or stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms and may significantly increase our operating expenses. The technology also may not be available for license to us at all. As a result, we may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for the infringing aspects of our business, we may be forced to limit our product and service offerings and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results could harm our brand and operating results.

Government regulation could adversely affect our business prospects.

We do not know with certainty how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyright and other intellectual property issues, taxation, illegal content, retransmission of media, personal privacy and data protection will apply to the Internet or to the distribution of proprietary content over the Internet. Most of these laws were adopted before the advent of the Internet and related technologies and therefore do not address the unique issues associated with the Internet and related technologies. Depending on how these laws developed and are interpreted by the judicial system, they could have the effect of:

Our President has had limited experience in managing a publicly traded company.

Our President, Simon Au, has had limited experience in managing a publicly traded company. Such responsibilities include complying with federal securities laws and making required disclosures on a timely basis. There can be no assurance that our President will be able to implement programs and policies in an effective and timely manner that adequately respond to such legal and regulatory compliance and reporting requirements. Further, this could impair our ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements such as those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our failure to do so could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties and further result in the deterioration of our business.

The loss of the services of our President would disrupt our operations and interfere with our ability to compete.

We depend upon the continued contributions of our President, Simon Au. We only have one employee, our President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director, Simon Au. He handles all of the responsibilities in the area of corporate administration, business development and research. We do not carry key person life insurance on Mr. Au’s life and the loss of his services could disrupt our operations and interfere with our ability to compete with others.


- 12 -

All of our assets and our officer and director are outside the United States, with the result that it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or our officer and director.

All of our assets are located outside the United States and we do not currently maintain a permanent place of business within the United States. In addition, our sole officer and director, Simon Au, is not a national or resident of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of Mr. Au’s assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or our sole officer and director, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. Consequently, you may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies under U.S. federal securities laws against us or our sole officer and director.

Roger Williams’ control may prevent you from causing a change in the course of our operations and may affect the price of our common stock.

Our founder and former President, Roger Williams, beneficially owns 50.06% of our common stock. Accordingly, for as long as Mr. Williams continues to own more than 50% of our common stock, he will be able to elect our entire board of directors, control all matters that require a shareholder vote (such as mergers, acquisitions and other business combinations, and the future issuance of our shares) and exercise a significant amount of influence over our management and operations. Therefore, your ability to cause a change in the course of our operation is eliminated. As such, the value attributable to the right to vote is limited.

Our technical systems are vulnerable to interruption and damage that may be costly and time-consuming to resolve and may harm our business and reputation.

A disaster could interrupt our services for an indeterminate length of time and severely damage our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, floods, network failure, hardware failure, software failure, power loss, telecommunication failures, break-ins, terrorism, war or sabotage, computer viruses, denial of service attacks, penetration of our network by unauthorized computer users and “hackers” and other similar events, and other unanticipated problems.

We may not have developed or implemented adequate protections or safeguards to overcome any of these events. We may also not have anticipated or addressed many of the potential events that could threaten or undermine our technology network. Any of these occurrences could cause material interruptions or delays in our business, result in the loss of data or render us unable to provide services to our consumers. In addition, if anyone can circumvent our security measures, he or she could destroy or misappropriate valuable information or disrupt our operations. Our insurance, if any, may not be adequate to compensate us for all the losses that may occur as a result of a catastrophic system failure or other loss, and our insurers may decline to do so for a variety of reasons.

If we fail to address these issues in a timely manner, we may lose the confidence of our online advertisers, and our revenue may decline and our business could suffer.

We rely on an outside firm to host our servers, and a failure of service by these providers could adversely affect our business and reputation.

We rely upon a third party provider to host our main server. In the event that these providers experience any interruption in operations or cease operations for any reason or if we are unable to agree on satisfactory terms for continued hosting relationships, we would be forced to enter into a relationship with other service providers or assume hosting responsibilities ourselves. If we are forced to switch hosting facilities, we may not be successful in finding an alternative service provider on acceptable terms or in hosting the computer server ourselves. We may also be limited in our remedies against these providers in the event of a failure of service. We also rely on a third party provider for revenue, Google Adsense. A failure or limitation of service or available capacity by any of these third party providers could adversely affect our business and reputation.


- 13 -

Our business depends in part on the growth and maintenance of the Internet and telecommunications infrastructure.

The success of our business depends in part on the continued growth and maintenance of the Internet and telecommunication infrastructure. This includes maintaining a reliable network backbone with the necessary speed, data capacity and security for providing reliable Internet services. Internet infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on it if the number of Internet users continue to increase or if existing or future Internet users access the Internet more often or increase their bandwidth requirements. We have no control over the providers of access services to the Internet. Interruptions, delays or capacity problems with any points of access between the Internet and our websites could adversely affect our ability to provide services to users of our websites. The temporary or permanent loss of all or a portion of our services on the Internet, the Internet infrastructure generally, or our users’ ability to access the Internet, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and the trading price of our common stock.

Risks Associated With Our Common Stock

There is no active trading market for our common stock and if a market for our common stock does not develop, our investors will be unable to sell their shares.

There has been a limited trading market for our common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, our shareholder may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our common shares. This severely limits the liquidity of our common shares and has a material adverse effect on the market price for our common shares and on our ability to raise additional capital. An active public market for our common shares may not develop, or if one should develop, it may not be sustained, and as a result, investors may not be able to resell our common shares that they have purchased and may lose all of their investment

We do not intend to pay dividends on any investment in the shares of stock of our company.

We have never paid any cash dividends and currently do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. To the extent that we require additional funding currently not provided for in our financing plan, our funding sources may prohibit the payment of a dividend. Because we do not intend to declare dividends, any gain on an investment in our company will need to come through an increase in the stock’s price. This may never happen and investors may lose all of their investment in our company.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our


- 14 -

securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sales practice requirements may also limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Because we can issue additional common shares, our shareholders may experience dilution.

We are authorized to issue up to 75,000,000 common shares, of which 8,190,000 are issued and outstanding. Our board of directors has the authority to cause our company to issue additional shares of common stock without the consent of any of our shareholders. Consequently, our shareholders may experience dilution in their ownership of our company in the future.

If we fail to file our required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an accurate and timely manner, our common stock may be no longer quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. If this happens, our stockholders would have difficulty in reselling any of their shares.

If we fail to file our required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an accurate and timely manner, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority may determine that our common stock is no longer eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board and remove our common stock from the OTC Bulletin Board quotations. If this happens, then market makers would no longer be able to enter quotations for our common stock through the OTC Bulletin Board and our stockholders would have difficulty in reselling any of their shares.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our ability to continue operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could reduce liquidity of our common stock and reduce our ability to raise capital. Because a significant portion of our operations have been and will be financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our operations. Such reductions may force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital in the future, we may not be able to have the resources to continue our normal operations.

The market price for our common stock may also be affected by our ability to meet or exceed expectations of analysts or investors. Any failure to meet these expectations, even if minor, may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.


Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.Comments


Not applicable.
Applicable.


- 15 -


Item 2. Properties.Properties


Our executive and head office is located at 2908 – 30 Harrison Garden848 N. Rainbow Blvd., Toronto, Ontario M2N 7A9, Canada,#2952, Las Vegas, NV  89107.  The Company also operates a motor cross race track, located in Floresville, Texas through its subsidiary, Cycle Ranch.  The Company owns a 99% interest in the company which is the located residence of our President, Simon Au.

We own the domain names dinehere.ca and dinehere.com. All content on the website including restaurant and reviews are considered copyright. Although Dine Here 2.0 is based on Drupal, an open source software package, it also includes custom modules which are proprietary to Dine Here and that Here Network Corp. owns the copyright to. We have registered the dinehere.ca domain until October 27, 2013 and maintaining the registration costs $14/year thereafter. We have registered the domain www.dinehere.com until February 9, 2010 and maintaining the registration costs $10/year thereafter.lease on that property.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Proceedings

We know of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.  There are no proceedings in which our director and officer, or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.(Removed And Reserved)

None.


PART II


Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.


Our common shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol “HRTE.OB”.  There were very few trades in our common shares.  The following quotations obtained from the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Quarter EndedHighLow
May 31, 2009$0$0
February 28, 2009$0$0
November 30, 2008$1.01$0
August 31, 2008$0$0
May 31, 2008$0.75$0.75
February 29, 2008$0.20$0.15

Quarter Ended

High

Low

May 31, 2010

$1.50

$0






February 28, 2010

$1.50

$0

November 30, 2009

$0

$0

August 31, 2009

$1.01

$0

May 31, 2009

$0

$0

February 28, 2009

$0

$0

November 30, 2008

$1.01

$0

August 31, 2008

$0

$0

May 31, 2008

$0.75

$0.75

February 29, 2008

$0.20

$0.15

There were no quotations reported for our common shares as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board prior to January 2008.  The last sale price of our common shares on July 31, 2009,June 1, 2010, was $1.01$2.02 per share.

There are currently 3315 holders of record of our common stock.

There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or securities convertible into, our common shares.  None of our issued and outstanding shares can be sold pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933.

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends since inception.  We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The


- 16 -

NevadaTheNevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:


Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.Data.


 

Accumulated

 

 

 

From Nov. 15,

 

 

 

2006 (Date of

 

 

 

Inception) to

Year Ended

Year Ended

 

May 31,

May 31

May 31

 

2010

2010

2009

 

 

 

 

Revenues from continuing operations

$                       -   

$                       -   

$                   -  

Total operating expenses

$          285,218

$           109,665

$        69,623

Operating Loss

(285,218)

(109,665)

(69,623)

Net loss

(264,490)

(70,869)

(83,341)

Net cash provided by financing activities

166,872

45,200

40,000

Cash used in operating activities

(142,441)

(46,658)

(36,462)

Cash and cash equivalents on hand

3,087

3,087

7,644

Net loss per common share: Basic and Diluted

 

(0.01)

(0.01)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

 

8,190,000

8,190,000

Property and equipment acquired from a related

 

 

 

Not applicable.





party

3,515

-  

-  

Stockholders’ deficit

 

(100,515)

(47,120)


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs.  Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in thisour annual report, particularly in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8.8 of the annual report.

Our audited consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

Overview

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 15, 2006.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia on December 12, 2006.  We commenced business operations withOn March 9, 2010, the acquisition of dinehere.ca on December 12, 2006.

Through ourCompany sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., we operate a website dining guide at www.dinehere.ca called Dine Here. The website contains restaurant listings to Company’s controlling shareholders in exchange for British Columbia including Greater Vancouver, Victoria and Whistler. Visitors can view restaurant information for manythe return of 5,600,000 common shares of the restaurants in the cities covered including user contributed reviews that have a title, description of their experience and ratings for categories including food, service, ambiance and an overall rating. Internet visitors can also register at the website and submit reviews on any restaurant or add new restaurant listings.Company, which were distributed to certain shareholders..  

Sources of Revenue

We currently have one source of revenue that consists of Google Adsense advertisements. Google Adsense is an advertising solution for web publishers such as Dine Here. The web publisher agrees to place text advertisements on their website in return for a 50-50 split of all revenue derivedCompany did not generate revenues from the advertising placed on the website.

Revenue is accrued when visitors click on advertisements on a pay per click basis. Google Adsense has a sophisticated, contextual advertisement serving system that allows them to target advertisements on Dine Here to serve only those that relate geographically or match the theme of the website. Advertisers using Google Adsense generally include local newspapers, phone book companies, restaurants, other local businesses or anyone else that pays for this marketing service. The advertisements are served within the text-based content of the site and can include up to three advertisements depending on the web page. Google Adsense pays its publishers by corporate check on a monthly basis at the end of the month,continuing operations for the previous month. This is paid in US dollars and delivered by mail.

We are currently developing a new version of the website for Dine Here. With the development of the new website, we intend to add a new source of revenue by offering direct advertising to businesses. The direct advertising is planned to work differently than Google Adsense. Instead of being based on performance using a pay per click


- 17 -

model, the direct advertising is planned to be impression-based and charged on the number of times the advertisements are displayed.

Website

Our website is hosted on a dedicated server rented toyear ended May 31, 2010.  Revenues generated from Here Network Corp. on a month to month basis by Superb Internet Corporation. Superb charges a monthly fee of $282.45. The server is hostedhave been included in Seattle, Washington. We retained Wickle Media Corp. of Vancouver, Canada to complete the development of the new website for $2,000, to be paid in full upon completion. We expect to launch the new website on September 30, 2009.loss from discontinued operations.

Results of Operations

Year ended May 31, 2009 to2010 and May 31, 20082009

The following table summarizes our operating results for the years ended May 31, 2009 and 2008:

 Year Ended May 31, 

  

Year Ended May 31,

 

 2009  2008 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

Revenue$5,559 $9,749 

$

-  

 

$

-  

 

Operating Expenses 88,900  104,595 

 

109,665

 

 

69,623

 

Net Loss$(83,341)$(94,846)

$

(70,869

)

$

(83,341

)

During the year ended May 31, 2009, we generated revenues of $5,559General and our operating expensesadministrative costs were $88,900 as compared to revenues of $9,749 and operating expenses of $104,595$109,665 for the year ended May 31, 2008. The decrease in revenues was caused by lower advertising rates from Google Adsense and a decrease in traffic due2010 as compared to increased competition. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the cost of becoming a public company in the United States that was incurred during the year ended May 31, 2008.

General and administrative costs were $83,018$69,923 for the year ended May 31, 2008 as compared to $99,777 for the year ended May 31, 2008.2009. The decreaseincrease in general and administrative costs was primarily attributable to Interest expense accrued and management fees incurred to offices of the cost of becoming a public company in the United States that was incurred during the year ended May 31, 2008.

One of our employees provided management services, valued at $2,000 per month, and office premises, valued at $250 per month, to us at no charge. During the year ended May 31, 2009, $24,000 in these donated services and $3,000 in donated rent were charged to operations as compared to $24,000 in donated services and $3,000 in donated rent for the year ended May 31, 2008.Company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

 At May 31,  At May 31, 

 

At May 31,

 

 

At May 31,

 

                  2009  2008 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

Current assets$8,545 $11,743 

$

3,087

 

$

8,545

 

Current liabilities 62,837  15,835 

 

103,602

 

 

62,837

 

Working capital (deficiency)$(54,292)$(4,092)

Working Capital Deficit

$

(100,515

)

$

(54,292

)


As of May 31, 2008,2010, we had cash of $3,087, and a working capital of $100,515, as compared to cash of $7,644, and a working capital deficit of $54,292 as compared to cash of $9,628 and working capital deficit of $4,092 as of May 31, 2008.2009.  We have suffered a net loss from




inception.  The abilitycompany is indebted to a director in the amount of our company$200, as of May 31, 2010, for expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.  As of May 31, 2010, the Company was indebted to meet our financial liabilitiesa shareholder in the amount of $5,500.  

On May 12, 2010, the Company issued a contingently convertible promissory note to The Good One, Inc. for proceeds of $10,000.  The Note is unsecured and commitmentsbears an interest at 5% per annum.  It is primarily dependentautomatically convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock upon satisfaction of certain conditions.  If those conditions are not met, the continued financial supportnote and accrued interest is repayable on November 12, 2010 at a conversion price of our director and shareholders,30% of the continued issuanceaverage closing bid price for the three business days prior to the notice of equity to new shareholders, and our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations.conversation as quoted on the Pink Sheets quotation system.  

On October 8, 2008, we issued to Mountain Equity Ltd., a demand promissory note in the amount of $30,000. The promissory note is not subject to any specific repayment terms, and will accrue interest at the rate of 20% per annum


- 18 -

on the principal amount remaining unpaid, after as well as before demand or maturity or default occurs. If we fail to pay the principal amount of the promissory note or any interested thereon upon demand, then the entire unpaid principal and all accrued and unpaid interest becomes payable immediately.

On April 8, 2009, we issued to Minerco Resources, Inc., a promissory note in the amount of $10,000. The promissory note bears no interest and is unsecured. If we fail to pay on demand any payment of principal on the promissory note, then in such event the entire unpaid principal becomes due and payable immediately.

In June 2009, pursuant to the letter agreement between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and our company, Magnolia agreed to advance us $20,000. The advance of $20,000 was to be utilized by us solely for expenses related to the completion of the audit of our financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009. In addition, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the memorandum of understanding dated May 15, 2009 between Magnolia and our company, $20,000 was to be applied as a credit against the purchase price for the controlling interest in our company as contemplated by the memorandum of understanding. If such transactions failed to close on or before August 31, 2009 or such later date as agreed by Magnolia and us, through no fault of our company, $20,000 was to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to us. If we or our majority shareholders, for any reason, determined not to proceed with such transactions upon being presented with the definitive merger agreement, $20,000 was to be immediately due and payable to Magnolia within 10 days of being presented with the definitive agreement. We extended the closing date to December 15, 2009.

On October 15, 2009, Magnolia advanced our company $15,000 of $20,000 contemplated under the letter agreement. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the memorandum of understanding and we consider $15,000 from Magnolia as a “break up” fee. Accordingly, we recognized $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations for the nine-month period ended February 28, 2010. Management does not expect our company to receive from Magnolia the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the letter agreement.


Management believes that our company’s cash will not be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for the next twelve month period. We plan to raise the capital required to satisfy our immediate short-term needs and additional capital required to meet our estimated funding requirements for the next twelve months primarily through future debt or equity financing. There is no assurance that our companywe will be able to obtain further funds required for our continued working capital requirements. If we are not able to obtain additional funds on a timely basis, we will be unable to conduct our operations as planned. In such event, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.

Going Concern




There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as the continuation of our business is dependent upon the continued financial support from our shareholders, our ability to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current shareholders.  Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

Because we have a working capital deficit, have generated minimal revenues, and have incurred losses from operations since inception, in their report on our audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009,2010, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Item 7A. Quantitative Andand Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.


Not Applicable.
applicable.


- 19 -



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.




Here Enterprises, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

May 31, 20092010



Index

Index
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF–1
Consolidated Balance SheetsF–2
Consolidated Statement of OperationsF–3
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)F–4
Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsF–5
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF–6 – F-11

F-1




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F–1


Consolidated Balance Sheet

F–2


Consolidated Statement of Operations

F–3


Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit

F–4


Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

F–5


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F–6 – F-11










[heremay1010kdraftv7final002.gif]



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Directors and Stockholders of

Here Enterprises, Inc. (A Development Stage Company)


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Here Enterprises, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of May 31, 20092010 and 20082009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, and accumulated from November 15, 2006 (Date of Inception) to May 31, 2009.2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Here Enterprises, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of May 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended, and accumulated from November 15, 2006 (Date of Inception) to May 31, 20092010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficit, has generated minimal revenues, and has incurred losses from operations since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ “MANNING ELLIOTT“Manning Elliott LLP”


CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, Canada

August 4, 2009September 24, 2010


F–1




Here Enterprises, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

  May 31,  May 31, 
  2009  2008 
  $  $ 
       
Current Assets      
       
   Cash 7,644  9,628 
       
   Accounts receivable 901  2,115 
       
Total Current Assets 8,545  11,743 
       
       
Property and equipment (Note 3) 1,236  2,565 
       
Website (Note 4) 5,936  12,042 
       
Total Assets 15,717  26,350 
       
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)      
       
Current Liabilities      
       
   Accounts payable 4,670  2,897 
       
   Accrued liabilities 8,071   
       
   Due to related parties (Note 5(a)) 10,096  12,938 
       
   Short-term loans payable (Note 6) 40,000   
       
Total Current Liabilities 62,837  15,835 
       
Nature of Operations and Going Concern (Note 1)      
Commitment (Note 8)      
       
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)      
       
   Common stock      
       Authorized: 75,000,000 shares, par value $0.001      
       Issued and outstanding: 8,190,000 shares 8,190  8,190 
       
   Additional paid-in capital 72,810  72,810 
       
   Donated capital (Note 5(b)) 66,375  39,375 
       
   Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (874) 420 
       
   Deficit accumulated during the development stage (193,621) (110,280)
       
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (47,120) 10,515 
       
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) 15,717  26,350 



 

May 31,

2010

$

May 31,

2009

$

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

3,087

7,644

Accounts receivable

901

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

3,087

8,545

 

 

 

Property and equipment (Note 3)

1,236

 

 

 

Website (Note 4)

5,936

 

 

 

Total Assets

3,087

15,717

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

3,313

4,670

Accrued liabilities

9,889

8,071

Due to related parties (Note 6)

30,700

10,096

   Loans payable (Note 7)

49,700

40,000

   Contingently convertible promissory note (Note 8)

10,000

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

103,602

62,837

 

 

 

Nature of Operations and Going Concern (Note 1)

Commitment (Note 11)

Subsequent Events (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock  (Note 5)

  Authorized: 1,500,000,000 shares, par value $0.001

  Issued and outstanding: 8,190,000 shares

8,190

8,190

Preferred stock  

  Authorized: 50,000,000 shares, par value $0.001

Issued and outstanding: nil shares

-

-

Subscriptions receivable (Note 5)

(5,600)

-

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

72,810

72,810

 

 

 

Donated capital (Note 6(c))

89,375

66,375

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(874)

 

 

 

Deficit accumulated during the development stage

(265,290)

(193,621)

 

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Deficit

(100,515)

(47,120)

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit

3,087

15,717

 

 

 


(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

F–2




Here Enterprises, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)


  Accumulated       
  from       
  November 15,       
  2006       
  (Date of  Year  Year 
  Inception)  Ended  Ended 
  to May 31,  May 31,  May 31, 
  2009  2009  2008 
   $     
       
Revenue 18,826  5,559  9,749 
          
Operating Expenses         
          
   Amortization 11,675  5,882  4,818 
   General and administrative (Note 5(b)) 200,772  83,018  99,777 
          
Total Operating Expenses 212,447  88,900  104,595 
          
Net Loss (193,621) (83,341) (94,846)
          
Other Comprehensive Income         
          
   Foreign currency translation adjustments (874) (1,294) 90 
          
Comprehensive Loss (194,495) (84,635) (94,756)
          
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted    (0.01) (0.01)
          
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted    8,190,000  8,190,000 


 

 

Accumulated from

November 15,

2006

(Date of Inception)

to May 31,

2010

$






Year

Ended

May 31,

2010

$






Year

Ended

May 31,

2009

$

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

 

 




Operating Expenses

 




 

 




General and administrative (Note 6)

 

285,218

109,665

69,623

 

 




Operating Loss

 

(285,218)

(109,665)

(69,623)

 

 




Other Income (Expense)

 




 

 




Other income (Note 9)

 

15,000

15,000

Gain on forgiveness of loans payable (Notes 7(c) and (d))

 

20,672

20,672

Loss on forgiveness of advances to Here Network Corp. (Note 5)

 

(21,258)


(21,258)


 

 




 

 

14,414

14,414

 

 




Loss From Continuing Operations

 

(270,804)

(95,251)

(69,623)

 

 




Discontinued Operations (Note 5)

 




   Loss from discontinued operations

 

(21,946)

(3,878)

(13,718)

   Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

 

28,260

28,260

 

 




 

 

6,314

24,382

(13,718)

 

 




Net Loss

 

(264,490)

(70,869)

(83,341)

 

 




Other Comprehensive Income

 




 

 




   Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

(1,294)

 

 




Comprehensive Loss

 

(264,490)

(70,869)

(84,635)

 

 




Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted

 




Continuing Operations

 


(0.01)

(0.01)

Discontinued Operations

 


 

 




 

 


(0.01)

(0.01)

 

 





Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted

 



8,190,000


8,190,000

 

 

 

 

 


(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

F–3




Here Enterprises, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit

For the period from NovemberNov. 15, 2006 (Date of Inception) to May 31, 2009
2010

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

  Common Stock                
                 Deficit    
              Accumulated  Accumulated    
        Additional     Other  During the    
        Paid-in  Donated  Comprehensive  Development    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Capital  Income (Loss)  Stage  Total 
  #  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Balance, November 15, 2006                     
(date of inception)              
Common stock issued for cash at                     
$0.001 per share, November 15,                     
2006 100,000  100          100 
Common stock issued for cash at                     
$0.001 per share, March 15, 2007 5,500,000  5,500  49,500        55,000 
Common stock issued for cash at                     
$0.001 per share, April 15, 2007 2,590,000  2,590  23,310        25,900 
Donated services and rent       12,375      12,375 
Foreign currency translation         330    330 
Net loss for the period           (15,434) (15,434)
Balance, May 31, 2007 8,190,000  8,190  72,810  12,375  330  (15,434) 78,271 
                      
Donated services and rent       27,000      27,000 
Foreign currency translation         90    90 
Net loss for the period           (94,846) (94,846)
Balance, May 31, 2008 8,190,000  8,190  72,810  39,375  420  (110,280) 10,515 
                      
Donated services and rent       27,000      27,000 
Foreign currency translation         (1,294)   (1,294)
Net loss for the period           (83,341) (83,341)
Balance, May 31, 2009 8,190,000  8,190  72,810  66,375  (874) (193,621) (47,120)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

Treasury Shares

Subscriptions Receivable

Additional Paid-in Capital

Donated

Capital

Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage

Total

 

#

 

$

$

$

$

$

$

 

$

$

Balance, May 31, 2007

8,190,000

 

8,190

72,810

12,375

330

 

(15,434)

78,271

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donated services and rent

 

27,000

 

27,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

90

 

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss for the year

 

 

(94,846)

(94,846)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, May 31, 2008

8,190,000

 

8,190

72,810

39,375

420

 

(110,280)

10,515

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donated services and rent

 

27,000

 

27,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

(1,294)

 

(1,294)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss for the year

 

 

(83,341)

(83,341)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, May 31, 2009

8,190,000

 

8,190

72,810

66,375

(874)

 

(193,621)

(47,120)

Shares returned to treasury upon disposition of Here Network Corp.

 

(6,400)




 

(6,400)

5,600,000 shares issued for $0.001 per share

 

6,400

(5,600)

 

(800)

Donated services and rent

 

23,000

 

23,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

874

 

874

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss for the year

 

 

(70,869)

(70,869)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, May 31, 2010

8,190,000

 

8,190

(5,600)

72,810

89,375

 

(265,290)

(100,515)


(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

F–4




Here Enterprises, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

  Period From       
  November 15,       
  2006  Year  Year 
  (Date of Inception)  Ended  Ended 
  to May 31, 2009  May 31,2009  May 31,2008 
  $  $  $ 
Operating Activities         
   Net loss for the period (193,621) (83,341) (94,846)
         Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash         
               provided by (used in) operating activities:         
         Amortization 11,675  5,882  4,818 
         Donated services and rent 66,375  27,000  27,000 
   Changes in operating assets and liabilities:         
       Accounts receivable (901) 1,214  (1,274)
       Prepaid expenses     2,500 
       Accounts payable 4,670  1,773  2,897 
       Accrued liabilities 8,071  8,071  (2,504)
       Due to related parties 1,495  (2,842) 446 
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities (102,236) (42,243) (60,963)
Investing Activities         
   Website development costs (11,297)   (9,194)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (11,297)   (9,194)
Financing Activities         
   Proceeds from issuance of common stock 81,000     
   Proceeds from loan payable 40,000  40,000   
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 121,000  40,000   
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash 177  259  138 
Change in Cash 7,644  (1,984) (70,019)
Cash, Beginning of Period   9,628  79,647 
Cash, End of Period 7,644  7,644  9,628 
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities         
   Property and equipment acquired from a related party 3,515     
   Website acquired from a related party 4,330     
Supplemental Disclosures         
   Interest paid      
   Income taxes paid      



 

Period From

November 15,

2006

(Date of Inception)

to May 31, 2010

$



Year

Ended

May 31,2010

$



Year

Ended

May 31,2009

$

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

(270,804)

(95,251)

(69,623)

 

 

 

 

Non-cash items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donated services and rent

89,375

23,000

27,000

Gain on forgiveness of loans payable

(20,672)

(20,672)

Loss on forgiveness of advances to Here Network Corp.


21,258


21,258


 

 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

3,313

(5,769)

1,848

Accrued liabilities

9,889

5,576

4,313

Due to related parties

25,200

25,200

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

(142,441)

(46,658)

(36,462)

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disposition of discontinued operations

(3,417)

Advances to Here Network Corp.

(21,258)

Purchase of Here Network Corp.

(86)

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

(21,344)

(3,417)

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from loan from shareholder

5,500

5,500

Proceeds from loan from former shareholder

672

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

81,000

Proceeds from issuance of contingently convertible promissory note


10,000


10,000


Proceeds from issuance of loans payable

82,700

42,700

40,000

Repayments of loans payable

(13,000)

(13,000)

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

166,872

45,200

40,000

 

 

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash

(107)

(297)

 

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash from Continuing Operations

3,087

(4,982)

3,241

 

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash from Discontinued Operations



425


(4,750)

 

 

 

 

Cash, Beginning of Period

7,644

9,153

 

 

 

 

Cash, End of Period

3,087

3,087

7,644

 

 

 

 

Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment acquired from a related party

3,515

Shares returned for disposal of Here Network Corp.

6,400

6,400

Website acquired from a related party

4,330

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

Income taxes paid

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

F–5




1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 15, 2006. On December 12, 2006, the Company incorporated Here Network Corp., a company incorporated in the province of British Columbia, Canada. On December 12, 2006, Here Network Corp. acquired a website www.dinehere.ca which provides restaurant listings and reviews to a broad spectrum of Internet visitors. The Company derives advertising revenue from this website. On March 9, 2010, the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp (see Note 5). The Company is a development stage company as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915, “Development Stage Company)Enterprises”.


Notes

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As of May 31, 2010, the Company has generated minimal revenue, has a working capital deficit of $100,515, and has incurred losses from operations of $264,490 since inception. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the Consolidated Financial Statementsrecoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company intends to fund operations through debt and equity financing arrangements (see Note 11), which may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements for the year ending May 31, 2011.  There is no assurance that the Company will obtain the necessary financing to complete its objectives.


(expressed


2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(l)

Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in U.S. dollars)
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its formerly wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Here Network Corp. from December 12, 2006 (date of inception) to March 9, 2010 (date of disposition - see Note 5). All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.  The Company’s fiscal year end is May 31.

1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

(l)

Here Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 15, 2006. On December 12, 2006, the Company incorporated Here Network Corp. (the “Subsidiary”), a company incorporated in the province of British Columbia, Canada. On December 12, 2006, the Subsidiary acquired a website www. dinehere.ca which provides restaurant listings and reviews to a broad spectrum of Internet visitors. The Company derives advertising revenue from this website. The Company is a development stage company as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting for Enterprises in the Development Stage”.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As of May 31, 2009, the Company has generated minimal revenue, has a working capital deficit of $54,292, and has incurred losses from operations of $193,621 since inception. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company intends to fund operations through revenue and equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements for the year ending May 31, 2010. There is no assurance that the Company will obtain the necessary financing to complete its objectives.

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)

Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Here Network Corp. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is May 31.


b)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful lives and recoverability of long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, donated expenses and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

c)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

F–6


Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated useful lives and recoverability of long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, donated expenses, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances and the valuation of financial instruments. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

(l)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.








2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

(l)

Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
Instruments and Concentrations

2.

ASC 825, Financial Instruments requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  ASC 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value.  A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  ASC 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

d)

Financial Instruments and Concentrations

SFAS No. 157“Fair Value Measurements”requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. SFAS No. 157 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation
methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, amounts due to related parties, loans payable and short-term notes payable.contingently convertible promissory note.  Pursuant to SFAS No. 157,ASC 825, the fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents, when applicable, is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.  The Company estimates that the carrying values of all of its other financial instruments approximate their fair values due to the immediate or relatively short maturities of these instruments.


Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were presented on the Company’s balance sheet as of May 31, 2010 as follows:

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Significant 

 

 

 

Active Markets

Other

Significant

 

 

For Identical

Observable

Unobservable

 

 

Instruments

Inputs

Inputs

Balance as of

 

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

May 31, 2010

 

$

$

$

$

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash

3,087

3,087

The Company does not have any liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis presented on the Company’s balance sheet as of May 31, 2010.

The Company’s discontinued operations are(see Note 5) were in Canada and virtually all of its assets and liabilities are givinggave rise to significant exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The financial risk is the risk to the Company’s operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable.cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by placing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions. For the year ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, 100% of revenues were earned from a single customer. As at May 31, 2009, 100% of accounts receivable was due from this customer.





2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

(e)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Amortization has been provided using the following methods and estimated useful lives:

Computer hardware

3 years straight-line

Furniture and office equipment

5 years straight-line

(f)

Website

The Company recognizes the costs associated with developing a website in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”.  The Company acquired its website from a third party. The Company is capitalizing costs of computer software obtained for internal use in web design and network operations. These capitalized costs will be amortized based on their estimated useful life over three years. Payroll and related costs will not be capitalized, as the amounts principally relate to maintenance. Internal costs related to the development of website content will be expensed as incurred.

(g)

Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, the carrying values of long-lived assets are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The Company recognizes impairment when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.

(h)

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional and reporting currencies of the Company are the United States dollar. The functional currency of the Here Network Corp. is the Canadian dollar. The financial statements of Here Network Corp. are translated to United States dollars under the current rate method in accordance with ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Translation Matters”. Under the current rate method, all assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange during the year. The effect of this translation is recorded in a separate component of stockholders’ deficit.

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the approximate rate of exchange at the transaction date. Assets and liabilities resulting from these transactions are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. All differences are recorded in the results of operations.

(i)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.

(j)

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue is derived from pay per click advertising placed on its website. The Company recognizes this advertising revenue in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition” when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the revenue has been earned, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

(k)

Comprehensive Income

ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at May 31, 2010, the Company’s does not have any accumulated other comprehensive loss.





2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

(l)

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company computes earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260,Earnings per Share which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As at May 31, 2010, the Company does not have any dilutive potential shares outstanding.

(m)

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the comparative figures to conform to the current period’s presentation.

(m)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends the ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASU No. 2010-06 amends the ASC to require collateraldisclosure of transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and also requires more detailed disclosure about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements.  The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures concerning purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which amends the ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASU No. 2009-05 amends the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard became effective on September 1, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.


In May 2009, FASB issued ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, which establishes an allowancegeneral standards of for doubtful accountsthe evaluation, recognition and disclosure of events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. Although there is new terminology, the standard is based on the agesame principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.







3.

Property and Equipment

 

May 31, 2010

 

May 31,

2009

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Net Book

 

Net Book

 

Cost

 

Amortization

 

Value

 

Value

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Computer hardware

 

 

 

929

Furniture and equipment

 

 

 

307

 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,236


4.

Website

 

 

May 31,

2010

 

May 31,

2009

 

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

Website


 

15,345

Less: Accumulated amortization


 

(9,409)

 



 


Net Carrying Value


 

5,936



5.

Discontinued Operations and Capital Stock


On March 9, 2010, the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp. to the Company’s controlling shareholders in exchange for the return of 5,600,000 common shares of the receivable andCompany to treasury. The transaction was measured at $6,400, the specific identificationestimated fair value of receivablesHere Network Corp., which was considered more reliably measureable than the Company’s stock as it does not trade in an active market. The Company recognized a gain on disposal of Here Network Corp. of $28,260. The 5,600,000 common shares were subsequently redirected to other shareholders of the Company considers at risk.a price of $0.001 per share. As at May 31, 2010, subscriptions in the amount of $5,600 are due from these shareholders. On May 31, 2010, the Company forgave advances of $21,258 provided to Here Network Corp. prior to its disposal.

ForThe results of discontinued operations of Here Network Corp. are summarized as follows:

 

 



Year

Ended

May 31,

2010

$



Year

Ended

May 31,

2009

$

Accumulated from

November 15,

2006

(Date of Inception)

to May 31,

2010

$

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

4,476

5,559

23,302

 

 




Operating Expenses

 




 

 




Amortization

 

4,388

5,882

16,063

General and administrative

 

3,966

13,395

29,185

 

 



,

Total Operating Expenses

 

8,354

19,277

45,248

 

 




Loss from Discontinued Operations

 

(3,878)

(13,718)

(21,946)

 

 









5.

Discontinued Operations and Capital Stock (continued)


The gain on disposal of Here Network Corp. is summarized as follows:

Amount

$

Consideration Received:




 Shares of the Company returned to treasury



6,400




Net Liabilities:




Cash



(3,417)

Other assets



(3,737)

Total liabilities



31,064

Accumulated other comprehensive loss



(2,050)






21,860




Gain on Disposal of Discontinued Operations



28,260





Cash flows of the discontinued operations of Here Network Corp. are summarized as follows:

 

 



Year

Ended

May 31,

2010

$



Year

Ended

May 31,

2009

$

Accumulated from

November 15,

2006

(Date of Inception)

to May 31,

2010

$

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

1,026

(5,844)

Investing activities

 

Financing activities

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(601)

1,094

 

 




Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash

 

425

(4,750)

 

 





6.

Related Party Transactions and Balances

(a)

As at May 31, 2010, the Company was indebted to a director (2009 – former directors) of the Company in the amount of $200 (May 31, 2009 - $10,096) for expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. The amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.


(b)

As at May 31, 2010, the Company was indebted to a shareholder of the Company in the amount of $5,500 (May 31, 2009 - $nil). The amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.


(c)

One former employee of the Company provided management services and office premises to the Company at no charge for the period from June 1, 2009 to March 8, 2010. From March 9, 2010 to May 31, 2010, an officer of the Company provided office premises to the Company at no charge. The donated services have an estimated fair value of $2,000 per month and office premises have an estimated fair value of $250 per month. During the year ended May 31, 2010, $20,000 (2009 - $24,000) in donated services and $3,000 (2009 - $3,000) in donated rent were charged to operations and recorded as donated capital.


(d)

On April 1, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the Chief Executive Officer of the Company to provide management services at a rate of $10,000 per month. The agreement can be terminated with notice of one month. During the year ended May 31, 2010, the Company incurred $20,000 in management fees under the agreement which has been recorded in general and administrative expense in the statement of operations. As at May 31, 2010, $20,000 was unpaid. The amount due is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.


6.

Related Party Transactions and Balances (continued)

(e)

On April 1, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the Chief Financial Officer of the Company to provide management services at a rate of $2,500 per month. The agreement can be terminated with notice of one month. During the year ended May 31, 2010, the Company incurred $5,000 in management fees under the agreement which has been recorded in general and administrative expense in the statement of operations. As at May 31, 2010, $5,000 was unpaid. The amount due is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.







7.  

Loans Payable


(a)

On October 8, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company for proceeds of $30,000.  The promissory note bears interest at 20% per annum, is unsecured and repayable on demand.


(b)

On April 8, 2009, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company for proceeds of $10,000. On June 26, 2009 and March 24, 2010, the Company issued additional promissory notes to this company for proceeds of $20,000 and $2,700 respectively. The Company repaid $5,000 on October 20, 2009, and $8,000 on November 19, 2009. The promissory notes bear no interest, are unsecured and have no fixed term for repayment.  


(c)

On March 31, 2010, the Company issued a promissory note to a former director of the Company for proceeds of $20,000. On May 31, 2010, the former director of the Company forgave the promissory note. The promissory note bore no interest, was unsecured and had no fixed term for repayment.  


(d)

On May 31, 2010, the former president of the Company forgave an amount owing to him totalling $672. The amount bore no interest, were unsecured and had no fixed term for repayment.  



8.

Contingently Convertible Promissory Note


On May 12, 2010, the Company issued a contingently convertible promissory note to The Good One, Inc. (see Note 11) for proceeds of $10,000.  The promissory note is unsecured, bears interest at 5% per annum and is automatically convertible into shares of the Company’s stock upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.  If the conditions for automatic conversion are not satisfied, the note and accrued interest is repayable on November 12, 2010. The conversion price is equal to 30% of the average closing bid price for the three business days prior to the notice of conversion as quoted on the Pink Sheets quotation system. The note may be repaid by the Company, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty.



9.

Other Income


On May 15, 2009, the Company signed Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia”) under which Magnolia was to acquire a majority interest in the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company from its controlling shareholders for $300,000 in a reverse merger transaction. On October 15, 2009, Magnolia advanced the Company $15,000 of the $20,000 deposit contemplated under the letter agreement. If the reverse merger transaction was to fail to close, through no fault of the Company, the $20,000 deposit was to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to the Company. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the MOU and abandoned the reverse takeover transactions.  Accordingly, the Company recognized the $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations during the year ended May 31, 2010. Management does not expect the Company to receive the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the agreement from Magnolia.  







10.

Income Taxes

The income tax recovery differs from the amount computed by applying the federal and state income tax rate of 35% (2009 – 35%) to loss from continuing operations for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 and 2008, revenue from a single customer represented 100% of total revenue. As at May 31, 2009 and 2008, 100% of accounts receivable is with this customer.as follows:

e)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Amortization has been provided using the following rates and methods:


Computer hardware3 years straight-line
Furniture and office equipment5 years straight-line

f)

Website

The Company recognizes the costs associated with developing a website in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position No. 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use”. Relating to website development costs the Company follows the guidance pursuant to the Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-2, “Accounting for Website Development Costs”.

F–7


Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

f)

Website (continued)

The Company acquired its website from a third party. The Company is capitalizing costs of computer software obtained for internal use in web design and network operations. These capitalized costs will be amortized based on their estimated useful life over three years. Payroll and related costs will not be capitalized, as the amounts principally relate to maintenance. Internal costs related to the development of website content will be expensed as incurred.

g)

Long-lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the carrying values of intangible assets and other long-lived assets are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The Company recognizes impairment when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.

h)

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Subsidiary is the Canadian dollar. The financial statements of the Subsidiary are translated to United States dollars under the current rate method in accordance with SFAS No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation”. Under the current rate method, all assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange during the year. The effect of this translation is recorded in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. A cumulative translation adjustment of $874 as of May 31, 2009 has been included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the approximate rate of exchange at the transaction date. Assets and liabilities resulting from these transactions are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. All differences are recorded in the results of operations.

i)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.

j)

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue is derived from pay per click advertising placed on its website. The Company recognizes this advertising revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the revenue has been earned, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

k)

Comprehensive Income

SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at May 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s only component of comprehensive loss consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments.

F–8


Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

l)

Earnings (Loss) per Share

The Company computes earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share" (“SFAS No. 128”). SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As at May 31, 2009, the Company had no dilutive securities outstanding.

m)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162 Identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. It is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133”. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) “Business Combinations”. SFAS 141 (Revised) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) will become effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB NO. 51”. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 will become effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

F–9


Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

n)

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active, and provides guidance on the key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. Effective June 1, 2008, the Company adopted the measurement and disclosure requirements related to financial assets and financial liabilities. The adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Effective June 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159, but the Company has not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial instruments as of May 31, 2009.

3.

Property and Equipment


            May 31, 
      May 31, 2009     2008 
      Accumulated  Net Book  Net Book 
   Cost  Amortization  Value  Value 
   $  $  $  $ 
              
 Computer hardware 3,038  2,109  929  2,116 
 Furniture and equipment 527  220  307  449 
              
   3,565  2,329  1,236  2,565 

4.

Website


  May 31,  May 31, 
  2009  2008 
  $  $ 
       
Website 15,345  16,722 
Less: Accumulated amortization (9,409) (4,680)
       
Net Carrying Value 5,936  12,042 

5.

Related Party Transactions

a)

As at May 31, 2009, the Company was indebted to the directors of the Company in the amount of $10,096 (2008 - $12,938), which is non-interest bearing, unsecured, and due on demand.

b)

One employee of the Company provided management services and office premises to the Company at no charge. The donated services have an estimated fair value of $2,000 per month and office premises have an estimated fair value of $250 per month. During the year ended March 31, 2009, $24,000 (2008 - $24,000) in donated services and $3,000 (2008 - $3,000) in donated rent were charged to operations and recorded as donated capital.

F–10


Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)

6.

Short-term Loans Payable

On October 8, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company in exchange for $30,000. The promissory note bears interest at 20% per annum, is unsecured and repayable on demand.

On April 8, 2009, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company in exchange for $10,000. The promissory note bears no interest, is unsecured and has no fixed term for repayment.

7.

Income Taxes

The Company has incurred net operating losses totalling $127,247, which begin to expire in 2027.

The income tax recovery reported in the statement of operations differs from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax rate of 35% to net loss before income taxes for the years ended May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2008 as follows:


   2009  2008 
   $  $ 
        
 Income tax recovery computed at statutory rates 29,170  32,248 
 Permanent differences (8,742) (9,180)
 Valuation allowance (20,428) (23,068)
        
 Income tax recovery    

 

 

 

2010

$

2009

$

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax recovery computed at statutory rates

 

 

33,338

24,368

Permanent differences

 

 

(8,050)

(9,450)

Other

 

 

(7,159)

5,510

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(18,129)

(20,428)

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax recovery

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as at May 31, 20092010 and 20082009 were as follows:

   2009  2008 
   $  $ 
        
 Deferred tax assets      
 - Net operating loss carryforward 44,536  24,108 
 - Less valuation allowance (44,536) (24,108)
        
 Net deferred tax assets    

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

$

2009

$

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 - Net operating loss carryforward

 

62,665

44,536

 - Less valuation allowance

 

(62,665)

(44,536)

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset and liability

 

 

 

 

 


8.

Commitment

On May 15, 2009, the Company signed Memorandum of Understanding with Magnolia Solar, Inc. ( “Magnolia” ) and the Company’s controlling shareholders to enter into a reverse takeover transaction. Under the reverse takeover transaction, Magnolia shall acquire a majority interest in the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company from the Company’s controlling shareholders for $300,000.

F–11The Company has incurred net operating losses totalling $179,042, which begin to expire in 2027. The Company has recognized a valuation allowance for the deferred income tax asset since the Company cannot be assured that it is more likely than not that such benefit will be utilized in future years.


-


11.

Subsequent Events


(a)

On July 20, -2010, the Company issued a $10,000 convertible note to a shareholder of the company for proceeds of $10,000. The convertible note is unsecured and bears interest at 5% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is repayable on demand commencing six months from the date of issuance. The note can be converted into shares of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity, at a conversion price equal to 30% of the average closing bid price for the three business days prior to the notice of conversion as quoted on the Pink Sheets quotation system The note may be repaid by the Company, in whole or in part, at any time with 10 days notice. The holder may either accept the prepayment or request that it be immediately converted to shares of the Company at the conversion price.


(b)

On August 3, 2010, the Company issued a $10,000 convertible note to a shareholder of the company for proceeds of $10,000. The convertible note is unsecured and bears interest at 5% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is repayable on demand commencing six months from the date of issuance. The note can be converted into shares of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity, at a conversion price equal to 30% of the average closing bid price for the three business days prior to the notice of conversion as quoted on the Pink Sheets quotation system The note may be repaid by the Company, in whole or in part, at any time with 10 days notice. The holder may either accept the prepayment or request that it be immediately converted to shares of the Company at the conversion price.






11.

Subsequent Events (continued)


(c)

On September 9, 2010, the Company entered into Share Purchase Agreement with The Good One, Inc. (“The Good One”), under which it agreed to purchase all of the common stock of Cycle Ranch, Inc. and ASB Land Company, Inc., and the 99% limited partnership interest of Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd., (collectively the “Shares”).  In exchange for the Shares, the Company will issue to The Good One a convertible promissory note in the amount of $5,000,000 (the “Note”).  The Note is unsecured and bears interest at 5% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is repayable on demand commencing six months from the date of issuance. The Note can be converted into shares of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity, at a conversion price equal to 50% of the average closing bid price for the three business days prior to the notice of conversion as quoted on the Pink Sheets quotation system (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price is subject to a minimum of $0.001 per share, being par value. The Note may be repaid by the Company, in whole or in part, at any time with 10 days notice. The Good One may either accept the prepayment or request that it be immediately converted to shares of the Company at the Conversion Price. In conjunction with the Share Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to guarantee the repayment of a $640,000 promissory note due from The Good One to a third party (the “Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note is secured by the Shares and bears interest at 6% per annum. Principal and interest are payable commencing March 1, 2010 in monthly installments of $5,063, increasing to $6,063 on September 1, 2010, with the remaining balance due on August 30, 2012. The Promissory Note may be repaid, in whole or in part at any time without penalty. The Shares are to be held in escrow until the Promissory Note and accrued interest are repaid. An estimate of the financial effect of this transaction cannot be made as at October 14, 2010, the date these financial statements were available to be issued, as reliable financial information relating to the net assets acquired by the Company on September 9, 2010 was unavailable. The combined financial statements of ASB Land Company, Inc. and Cycle Ranch Management, Ltd. are included in the Company’s 8-K filed on September 24, 2010.











Item 9. Changes Inin and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A(T).9A.  Controls and Procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being May 31, 2009.2010. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer).

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. These limitations also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control. The design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over time, currently implemented controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Due to the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Based upon that evaluation, our President concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveineffective as at the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the applicable time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our President to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 20092010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 31, 2009,2010, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. The ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was due to the existence of significant deficiencies constituting material weaknesses, as described in greater detail below. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:


- 21 -
*

We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting. To remediate the material weaknesses identified, we plan to implement the following changes during the year ending May 31, 2010:2011:

The above remediation efforts are largely dependent on our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, the remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit our company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter ended May 31, 20092010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.


Item 9B. Other Information.Information

April 8, 2009 Promissory Note

On April 8, 2009, we issued to Minerco Resources, Inc., a promissory note inMarch 9, 2010, the amount of $10,000. The promissory note bears no interest and is unsecured. If we fail to pay on demand any payment of principal on the promissory note, then in such event the entire unpaid principal becomes due and payable immediately.

Memorandum of Understanding with Magnolia Solar, Inc.

On May 15, 2009, we, certain significant shareholders of our company, and Magnolia Solar, Inc. entered into a memorandum of understanding with respectCompany sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., to the potential acquisition by MagnoliaCompany’s founders and then-controlling shareholders in exchange for the return of a majority interest in our company. The memorandum of understanding contemplates that pursuant to a mutually satisfactory definitive agreement between the parties, Magnolia will acquire a majority interest in the issued and outstanding5,600,000 common stock of our company from our company and certain significant shareholders of our company for $300,000. The


- 22 -

purchase price of $300,000 is contemplated to be raised by Midtown Partners as part of its $1,500,000 bridge funding.

The parties agreed to use their best efforts to negotiate in good faith the definitive agreement, which is contemplated to contain, among other things, the following provisions: (i) at the closing, Magnolia will own a majorityshares of the fully dilutedCompany.  The Company simultaneously assigned the shares of our common stock, withto certain individuals and entities for an amount equal to $5,600, which amount is currently due the understanding that post-bridge funding, Magnolia will hold approximately 85% of the issued and outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. The certain significant shareholders of our company will sell their shares as part of this transaction and new shares will be issuedCompany from authorized, leaving a total post-transaction capitalization to be finalized between the parties, in good faith, in the definitive agreement; (ii) we will eliminate all liabilities from our balance sheet and have no ongoing operations as of the closing date; (iii) we will deliver to Magnolia fiscal years 2007 and 2008 audits by an accounting firm accredited with the PCAOB and a member of the SEC practice section; (iv) we will deliver to Magnolia certified transfer sheets (or make same available through the transfer agent) as well as all corporate books and records and support documents for the audits; and (v) all officers and employees will resign from our company in all current capacities, with no further compensation due under their existing employment agreement.those shareholders.

There is no assurance that we will be able to complete the transactions as contemplated above, or on terms acceptable to our company.



PART III


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors and Executive Officers

A director of our company holds office until the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until his successors has been elected and qualified.  An officer of our company is appointed by our board of directors and holds office until his death, resignation or removal from office.  Our directordirectors and executive officer, hisofficers, their age, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:


Name


Position Held with our Company


Age

Date First
Elected or Appointed

Simon Au

Mark K. Ryun

President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director, CEO

39

51

September 10, 2008

March 4, 2010

Michael T. Moore

CFO

51

March 16, 2010

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of our officers and sole officer and director during at least the past five years, indicating his business experience, principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.

Simon Au, President, Secretary, TreasurerMichael T. Moore, CFO

In December of 1982, Michael T. Moore achieved a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting and Director
economics from the University of California located in Santa Barbara.

On September 10, 2008, Simon Au was appointed asSince June of 1985, Mr. Moore has been a directorcertified financial planner (CFP) with the Jung Financial Group, Ltd. and in June of our company and on September 12, 2008, he was appointed as our President, Secretary, and Treasurer.1987, Mr. AuMoore received the designation of an enrolled agent (EA). The Jung Financial Group, Ltd. is a mechanical engineer specializingdiversified financial services company located in manufacturing process. Mr. Au also has experiencethe state of Hawaii with offices based in Internet marketingHonolulu on Oahu and Hilo on the developmentisland of web based businesses having started his own Internet audio parts retailing operation called Audiyo Inc. in June, 2003 which operated its website at www.audiyo.com. From June, 2003 to present, Mr. Au has also servedHawaii. The Jung Financial Group, Ltd. offers investment management, small business accounting and tax services.

Since September of 1989 and as the Vice-President of Marketing/Development with Audiyo Inc., where he is responsible for website design, management of the launchdate of the company’s website, development of a supplier base of products to be sold through the website and development of Audiyo Inc.’s marketing strategy. From July 1999 to present,this report, Mr. AuMoore has been the manufacturingvice president and process engineera 50% shareholder of the Jung Financial Group, Ltd. Mr. Moore manages The Jung financial Group, Ltd. and oversees the small business accounting and tax service areas of the business as well as its accounting and financial reports.

Mark K. Ryun

Since July of 1991, Mr. Mark K. Ryun has been the president and chief executive officer of the Coastal Wood Floors, a full-service hardwood flooring contracting company based in Haleiwa, Hawaii. Over the past 18 years, Mr. Ryun has been a member of the board of directors with the Rollstamp Manufacturing DivisionHonolulu Board of Decoma International, where his responsibilities include design workcell layoutContractors in the State of Hawaii, the National Wood Flooring Association (NWFA), and plant layout, implementing continuous improvement projectsthe Better Business Bureau of Hawaii (BBB).

Since June of 1992, Mr. Ryun raced professional motocross for manufacturing processes including metal stamping, injection moldingPflueger Honda, Montgomery Motors, No Fear and painting. Rollstamp isOakley. He competed in Motocross events for ten years. During that time he also was employed





as a supplier of automotive exterior trim products. From September 1997 to July 1999, Mr. Au was the programmer/project coordinator with Schukra Manufacturing, a company involved in manufacturing seat lumbar supportsspokesman and stuntman for the automotive industry. Mr. Au’s


- 23 -

education background includes Magna International Training Certificates: (2000-2002), where he studied design for manufacturingDARE program of Hawaii, helping to educate the public about the harmful effects of drugs and assembly, mistake proofing, occupational health and safety and supervisor competency training; Concordia University where he received a Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering (1992-1996); Dawson College where he studied mechanical engineering technology (1989-1992) and Dawson College where he studied applied sciences (1987-1989).alcohol abuse.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our director and executive officer has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1.

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3.

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officer and director, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009,2010, all filing requirements applicable to our former officers and directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Corporate Governance

All proceedings of our board of directors for the year ended May 31, 20092010, were conducted by resolutions consented to in writing by our former directors or current director and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the board of directors. A shareholder who wishes to communicate with our board of directors may do so by directing a written request addressed to our President, at the address appearing on the first page of this annual report.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a code of ethics because our board of directors believes that our small size does not merit the expense of preparing, adopting and administering a code of ethics. Our board of directors intends to adopt a code of ethics when circumstances warrant.





Nominating and Compensation Committees

We do not have standing nominating or compensation committees, or committees performing similar functions. Our board of directors believebelieves that it is not necessary to have a standing compensation committee at this time because the


- 24 -

functions of such committee are adequately performed by our board of directors.  Our board of directors has not adopted a charter for the compensation committee.

Our board of directors also is of the view that it is appropriate for us not to have a standing nominating committee because our board of directors has performed and will perform adequately the functions of a nominating committee.  Our board of directors has not adopted a charter for the nomination committee.  There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors.  Our board of directors does not believe that a defined policy with regard to the consideration of candidates recommended by shareholders is necessary at this time because we believe that, given the early stages of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations are at a more advanced level.  There are no specific, minimum qualifications that our board of directors believes must be met by a candidate recommended by our board of directors.  The process of identifying and evaluating nominees for director typically begins with our board of directors soliciting professional firms with whom we have an existing business relationship, such as law firms, accounting firms or financial advisory firms, for suitable candidates to serve as directors.  It is followed by our board of directors’ review of the candidates’ resumes and interview of candidates.  Based on the information gathered, our board of directors then makes a decision on whether to recommend the candidates as nominees for director.  We do not pay any fee to any third party or parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominee.

Audit Committee

We do not have a standing audit committee or an audit committee charter at the present time.  Our board of directors has determined that we do not have a board member that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

We believe that our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.  The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors.  In addition, we believe that retaining a person who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.


The following table shows the compensation received by our executive officers for the fiscal years ended May 31, 20092010 and 2008:2009:







- 25 -

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE




Name
and Principal Position





Year




Salary
($)




Bonus
($)



Stock
Awards
($)



Option
Awards
($)


Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)

Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensatio
n Earnings
($)

All
Other
Compe
nsation
($)




Total
($)
Simon Au(1)
President, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director

2009

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil
Roger Williams(2)
Former President,
Secretary, Treasurer and
Director

2009
2008

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil
Michael McFadyen(3)
Former Vice President,
Director of Sales and
Director

2009
2008

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

Nil
Nil

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE





Name
and Principal Position






Year





Salary
($)





Bonus
($)




Stock
Awards
($)




Option
Awards
($)



Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)


Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation Earnings
($)


All
Other
Compe
nsation
($)





Total
($)

Simon Au(1)
President, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director


2010

2009


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil


Nil

Nil

Mark K. Ryun(3)

President, Secretary,Treasurer, CEO, Director

2010

$20,000

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Michael T. Moore(3)

CFO

2010

$5,000

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

(1)

 Mr. Au became our director on September 10, 2008 and our President, Secretary, and Treasurer on September 12, 2008.2008 and resigned all of his positions on March 4, 2010

(2)

 Mr. WilliamsRyun became our President, Secretary, Treasurer and director on November 15, 2006. He resigned as our director on September 10, 2008 and as our President, Secretary, and Treasurer on September 12, 2008.March 4, 2010.

(3)

 Mr. McFadyenMoore became our Vice President, Director of Sales and directorCFO on March 15, 2007. He resigned as our director on September 10, 2008 and as our Vice President, Director of Sales on September 12, 2008.16, 2010.

We have not entered into written employment agreements with our former directors and officers.  We have not entered into a written employment agreement with our current director and officer.officers.

There have been no arrangements or plans in which we have provided pension, retirement or similar benefits for our former directors and officers or our current director and officer.  We have not had any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation has been or may be paid to our former directors and officers or our current director and officer, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors in the future.

We have no plans or arrangements in respect of remuneration received or that may be received by our former officers or our current officer to compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control) or a change of responsibilities following a change of control.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End





As at May 31, 2009,2010, we had not adopted any equity compensation plan and no stock, options, or other equity securities were awarded to our former executive officers or current executive officer.

Director Compensation

Our former directors or current director did not receive or accrue any compensation for their services as a director during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.2010.  We have no formal plan for compensating our director for his service in his capacity as a director.  A director is entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors.  Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.


- 26 -


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth, as of August 27, 2009,July 1, 2010, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, as well as by our current director and executive officer.  Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.



Name and Address of Beneficial Owner



Title of Class

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership


Percentage
of Class(1)

Mark K. Ryan(2)

President, Secretary, Treasurer, CEO, Director

848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #2952,

Las Vegas, NV 89107

Common Stock

1,675,000(2)

20.45%

Michael T. Moore

CFO

848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #2952,

Las Vegas, NV 89107

Common Stock

0

0%

David Sayid

408 West 57th St., Suite 8E

New York, NY 10019

Common Stock

800,000

9.77%

Kaleidoscope Real Estate Inc.

3540 W. Sahra #461

Las Vegas, NV  89102

Common Stock

1,500,000

18.32%

Ecoinnovation, LLC

59-574 Makana Rd.

Haleiwa, HI  96712

Common Stock

800,000

9.77%

Acadia, LLC

131 E. Oakland Dr.

Saint Rose, LA  70087

Common Stock

800,000

9.77%

Amber Sunset Ventures, LLC

 

 

 





Name and Address of Beneficial Owner


Title of Class
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership

Percentage
of Class(1)
Simon Au
2908 – 30 Harrison Garden Blvd
Toronto, Ontario M2N 7A9
Canada
Common Stock00%
Roger Williams
23799 133rd Avenue
Maple Ridge, British Columbia V4R 2T9
Canada
Common Stock4,100,00050.06%
Michael McFadyen
927-B Kelvin Street
Coquitlam, British Columbia V3J 4W7
Canada
Common Stock1,500,00018.32%
Director and Executive Officer as a Group
(1 person)
Common Stock00%



172 E. Bullion

Marysvale, UT  84750

Common Stock

800,000

9.77%

Bayou Business, LLC

4041 Williams Blvd, Suite A9 #192

Kenner, LA  70065

Common Stock

800,000

9.77%

Director and Executive Officers as a Group
(2 person)

Common Stock

1,675,000

20.45%


(1)


(2)

Based on 8,190,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of August 27, 2009. June 1, 2010.

The shares are owned by Sunset Group, which is controlled by Mr. Ryan

Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owner of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable.  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.  Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such option or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Changes in Control

We are unawareOn September 9, 2010, we signed a Stock Purchase Agreement, and related documents, in which we purchased all of any contract or other arrangement the operationstock and limited partnership interests owned by The Good One, Inc..  While management of whichthe Company will not change as a result of this acquisition, it may atbe treated as a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company, exceptreverse capitalization for the memorandum of understanding that we entered into with certain significant shareholders of our company and Magnolia Solar, Inc. on May 15, 2009.financial reporting purposes. .  Please see “Item 1. Business” of Part I and “Item 9B. Other Information” of Part IIabove for more information regarding this memorandum of understanding.transaction.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Independence

Transactions with related persons

Other than as disclosed below and elsewhere, there has been no transaction, since the beginning of the year ended May 31, 2008,2009, or currently proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount


- 27 -

involvedamountinvolved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

(i)

any director or executive officer of our company;

(ii)

any beneficial owner of shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock; and

(iii)

any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons.







As at May 31, 2009, we were indebted to Roger Williams, our former President, Secretary, Treasurer and director, and a holder of 50.06% of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, in the amount of $3,781 and to Michael McFadyen, our former Vice President, Director of Sales and director, and a holder of 18.32% of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, in the amount of $6,315. Our indebtednessThese debts were obligations of Here Network Corp. and ceased to Mr. Williams and Mr. McFadyen is non-interest bearing, unsecured, and due on demand. The largest amount of principal outstanding since the beginningbe obligations of the year ended May 31, 2008 was $4,059 for Mr. Williams and $8,879 for McFadyen. SinceCompany upon the beginningsplit-off of the year ended May 31, 2008, we have not repaid any amount of principal to Mr. Williams or Mr. McFadyen.Here Network Corp. on March 9, 2010.

Also Mr. Williams provided management services and office premises to us at no charge.charge until March 9, 2010.  The donated services are valued at $2,000 per month and office premises are valued at $250 per month.  During the year ended May 31, 2009, $24,000$20,000 (2008 - $24,000) in donated services and $3,000$2,500 (2008 - $3,000) in donated rent were charged to operations and recorded as donated capital.

Mark Ryun received $20,000 in management fees for April and May, 2010, and donated rent for April and May, 2010 in the amount of $500.  Michael Moore received $5,000 in management fees for April and May, 2010.  

Director Independence

We currently act with one director, Simon Au.Mark K. Ryun.  As Mr. AuRyun is our President, he is not an “independent director” as the term is used in NASDAQ rule 5605(a)(2).

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.Services.


The aggregateAudit Fees: All fees billed or expected to be billed for each of the most recently completedlast two fiscal years ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 for professional services rendered by Manning Elliott LLPthe principal accountant for the audit of ourthe registrant's annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports andthe registrant's Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided by Manning Elliott LLPthe accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for thesethose fiscal periods were as follows:years.

 Year Ended
 May 31, 2009May 31, 2008
Audit Fees$15,300$21,360
Audit Related FeesNilNil
Tax FeesNilNil
All Other FeesNilNil
Total$15,300$21,360

Our board of directors, which acts as our audit committee, has adopted a policy governing the pre-approval by our board of directors of all services, audit and non-audit, to be provided to our company by our independent auditors. Under the policy, our board or directors has pre-approved the provision by our independent auditors of specific audit, audit related, tax and other non-audit services as being consistent with auditor independence. Requests or applications to provide services that require the specific pre-approval of our board of directors must be submitted to our board of directors by our independent auditors, and our independent auditors must advise our board of directors


- 28 -

as to whether,2009:

$15,300

2010

$25,000


Audit-Related Fees: All fees billed in the independent auditor’s view, the request or application is consistent with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules on auditor independence.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amounteach of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrant's financial statements and are not reported under Item 9(e)(f1) of Schedule 14A.


2009:

$ 0

2010:

$0


Tax Fees: The aggregate fees billed by Manning Elliott LLP and believes that the provisionin each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining the independencetax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning:


2009:

$ 0

Nature of Manning Elliott LLP.Services:

2010:

$ 0

Nature of Services


All Other Fees:


2009:

$ 0

2010:

$ 0





PART IV


Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.


Exhibit

Number

Description

3.1

Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)

3.2

Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)

3.3

Amended Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)

10.1

Agreement between Superb Internet Connection and our company (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)

10.2

Form of Subscription Agreement used in the private placements that closed on April 15, 2007 between our company and 32 investors (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)

10.3

Letter of Intent between Conversational Computing Corporation dated August 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2008)

10.4

Merger Term Sheet between Conversational Computing Corporation dated August 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2008)

10.5

Promissory Note dated October 8, 2008 issued by our company to Mountain Equity Ltd. in the amount of $30,000 (incorporated by reference from our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on January 14, 2009)

10.6*

Promissory Note dated April 8, 2009 issued by our company to Minerco Resources, Inc. in the amount of $10,000 (incorporated by reference from our annual report on Form 10-K filed on August 31, 2009)

10.7*

10.7

Memorandum of Understanding between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and certain significant shareholders of our company and our company dated May 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference from our annual report on Form 10-K filed on August 31, 2009)

21

Subsidiary of Here Enterprises, Inc.: Here Network Corp., a British Columbia Corporation

31*

Section 302 Certification of Simon Au

32*

Section 906 Certification of Simon Au

(1)

* Filed herewith.





- 29 -

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HERE ENTERPRISES, INC.
/s/ Simon Au
By: Simon Au
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 28, 2009


HERE ENTERPRISES, INC.


By:

/s/ Mark K. Ryun                           

Mark K. Ryun

Principal Executive Officer, President,

Principal Accounting Officer




By:

/s/ Michael T. Moore_________

Michael T. Moore, CFO



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

/s/ Simon Au
By: Simon Au
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 28, 2009





/s/ Mark K. Ryun__________________

Mark K. Ryun, Director, President,
Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer





F-25