UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
leu-20211231_g1.jpg
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021
Commission file number 1-14287
Centrus Energy Corp.
Delaware52-2107911
(State of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification No.)


6901 Rockledge Drive, Suite 800, Bethesda, Maryland 20817
(301) 564-3200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per shareLEUNYSE American
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o. No ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o. No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý   No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).     Yes ý   No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyý
Accelerated fileroEmerging growth companyo
Non-accelerated filerý
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the Common Stock was last sold as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of June 28, 2019,30, 2021, was $16.8$257.9 million. As of March 2, 2020,1, 2022, there were 8,673,97613,673,933 shares of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, and 798,413719,200 shares of the registrant’s Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange commission within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 20192021 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



TABLE OF CONTENTS




TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART IPage
PART I
Items 1.Business
Risk Factors
Properties
Legal Proceedings
PART II
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.Other Information
PART III
PART III
Executive Compensation
PART IV






FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In this context, forward-looking statements mean statements related to future events,
may address our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” and other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain.

For Centrus Energy Corp., particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include:include but are not limited to the following which are, and will be, exacerbated by the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and any worsening of the global business and economic environment as a result; risks related to the war in Ukraine and geopolitical conflicts and the imposition of sanctions or other measures that could impact our ability to obtain or sell low enriched uranium (LEU) under our existing supply contract with the Russian government-owned entity TENEX, Joint-Stock Company (“TENEX”); risks related to natural and other disasters, including the continued impact of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan on the nuclear industry and on our business, results of operations and prospects; risks related to financial difficulties experienced by customers or suppliers, including possible bankruptcies, insolvencies or any other inability to pay for our products or services or delays in making timely payment; risks related to pandemics and other health crises, such as the global COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent variants; the impact and potential extended duration of the current supply/demand imbalance in the market for low-enriched uranium (“LEU”); risks related to our ability to sell the LEU we procure pursuant to our purchase obligations under our supply agreementsincluding those imposed under the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement as amended (“RSA”), international trade legislation and other international trade restrictions; risks related to existing or new trade barriers and contract terms that limit our ability to procure LEU for, or deliver LEU to customers; pricing trends and demand in the uranium and enrichment markets and their impact on our profitability; risks related to the movement and timing of customer orders; risks related to our dependence on others for deliveries of LEU including deliveries from TENEX, under a commercial supply agreement with TENEX and deliveries under a long-term commercial supply agreement with Orano Cycle (“Orano”); risks associated with our reliance on third-party suppliers to provide essential products and services to us; risks related to the fact that we face significant competition from major producers who may be less cost sensitive or are wholly or partially government owned; risks that our ability to compete in foreign markets may be limited for various reasons; risks related to the fact that our revenue is largely dependent on our largest customers; risks related to our sales order book, including uncertainty concerning customer actions under current contracts and in future contracting due to market conditions and our lack of current production capability; risks related to whether or when government funding or demand for high-assay low-enriched uranium (“HALEU”) for government or commercial uses will materialize; risks and uncertainties regarding funding for continuation and deployment of the American Centrifuge technology; risks related to our ability to perform and absorb costs under our agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU for advanced reactors (the “HALEU Contract”) or to obtain contracts and funding to be able to continue operations and our ability to obtain and/or perform under other agreements; risks that we may not obtain the full benefit of the HALEU Contract and may not be able to operate the HALEU enrichment facility to produce HALEU after the completion of the existing HALEU Contract or that the HALEU enrichment facility may not be available to us as a future source of supply; risks related to uncertainty regarding our ability to commercially deploy competitive enrichment technology; risks related to the potential for further demobilization or termination of our American Centrifuge work; risks that we will not be able to timely complete the work that we are obligated to perform; risks related to our ability to perform fixed-price and cost-share contracts such as the HALEU Contract, including the risk that costs could be higher than expected; risks related to our significant long-term liabilities, including material unfunded defined benefit pension plan obligations and postretirement health and life benefit obligations; risks relating to our 8.25% notes (the “8.25% Notes”) maturing in February 20272027; the risks of revenue and operating results fluctuating significantly from quarter to quarter, and in some cases, year to year; risks related to the impact of financial market conditions on our Seriesbusiness, liquidity, prospects, pension assets and insurance facilities; risks related to the Company’s capital concentration; risks related to the value of our intangible assets related to the sales order book and customer relationships; risks related to the limited trading markets in our securities; risks related to decisions made by our Class B Senior Preferred Stock;stockholders regarding their investment in the Company based upon factors that are unrelated to the Company’s performance; risks that a small number of holders of our Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share (“Class A Common Stock”), (whose interests may not be aligned with other holders of our Class A Common Stock), may exert significant influence over the direction of the Company; risks related to the use of our net operating losslosses (“NOLs”) carryforwards and net unrealized built-in losses (“NUBILs”) to offset future taxable income and the use of the Rights Agreement (as defined herein) to prevent an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and our ability to generate taxable income to utilize all or a portion of the NOLs and NUBILs prior to the expiration thereof; risks related to the limited


trading markets infailures or security breaches of our securities;information technology systems; risks related to our ability to maintain the listing of our Class A Common Stock on the NYSE American LLC (the “NYSE American”); risks related to decisions made by our Class B stockholdersattract and our Series B Senior Preferred stockholders regarding their investment in the Company based upon factors that are unrelated to the Company’s performance;retain key personnel; risks related to the Company’s capital concentration; risks relatedpotential for DOE to natural and other disasters, includingseek to terminate or exercise its
3


remedies under its agreements with the continued impact of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan on the nuclear industry and on our business, results of operations and prospects; the impact and potential extended duration of the current supply/demand imbalance in the market for low-enriched uranium (“LEU”); our dependence on others for deliveries of LEU including deliveries from the Russian government-owned entity TENEX, Joint-Stock Company (“TENEX”), under a commercial supply agreement with TENEX and deliveries under a long-term supply agreement with Orano Cycle (“Orano”); risks related to existing or new trade barriers and contract terms that limit our ability to deliver LEU to customers;Company; risks related to actions, including government reviews, that may be taken by the United States government, the Russian government or other governments that could affect our ability to perform under our contract obligations or the ability of our sources of supply to perform under their contract obligations to us, including the imposition of sanctions, restrictions or other requirements, including risks relating to the potential expiration of the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement (“RSA”) and/or a renewal of the RSA on terms not favorable to us; risks related to our ability to sell the LEU we procure pursuant to our purchase obligations under our supply agreements; risks relating to our sales order book, including uncertainty concerning customer actions under current contracts and in future contracting due to market conditions and lack of current production capability; risks related to financial difficulties experienced by customers, including possible bankruptcies, insolvencies or any other inability to pay for our products or services; pricing trends and demand in the uranium and enrichment markets and their impact on our profitability; movement and timing of customer orders; risks related to the value of our intangible assets related to the sales order book and customer relationships; risks associated with our reliance on third-party suppliers to provide essential products and services to us; the impact of government regulation including by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; uncertainty regarding our ability to commercially deploy competitive enrichment technology; risks and uncertainties regarding funding for deployment of the American Centrifuge technology and our ability to perform and absorb costs under our agreement with DOE to demonstrate the capability to produce high assay low enriched uranium (“HALEU”) and our ability to obtain and/or perform under other agreements; risks relating to whether or when government or commercial demand for HALEU will materialize; the potential for further demobilization or termination of our American Centrifuge work; risks related to our ability to perform and receive timely payment under agreements with the DOE or other government agencies, including riskrisks and uncertainties related to the ongoing funding ofby the government and potential audits; risks related to changes or termination of agreements with the U.S. government or other counterparties; risks related to the competitive environment for our products and services; risks related to changes in the nuclear energy industry; risks related to the competitive bidding process associated with obtaining a federal contract; risks related to our ability to perform fixed-price and cost-share contracts, including the risk that costs could be higher than expected;government contracts; risks that we will be unable to obtain new business opportunities or achieve market acceptance of our products and services or that products or services provided by others will render our products or services obsolete or noncompetitive; risks that we will not be able to timely complete the work that we are obligated to perform; failures or security breaches of our information technology systems; risks related to pandemics and other health crises, such as the global novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak; potential strategic transactions whichthat could be difficult to implement, disrupt our business or change our business profile significantly; risks related to the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies (including lawsuits and government investigations or audits); the competitive environment for our products and services; changes in the nuclear energy industry;risks related to the impact of financial market conditions on our business, liquidity, prospects, pension assetsgovernment regulation and insurance facilities;policies including by the DOE and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; risks of revenueaccidents during the transportation, handling or processing of hazardous or radioactive material that may pose a health risk to humans or animals, cause property or environmental damage, or result in precautionary evacuations; risks associated with claims and operating results fluctuating significantlylitigation arising from quarter to quarter,past activities at sites we currently operate or past activities at sites that we no longer operate, including the Paducah, Kentucky, and in some cases, year to year;Portsmouth, Ohio, gaseous diffusion plants; and other risks and uncertainties discussed in this and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (“SEC”).


For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties and other factors that may affect our future results, please see Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, and the other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K and our subsequently filed documents. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by law.









4


PART I
Item 1.Business


Overview


Centrus Energy Corp., a Delaware corporation, (“Centrus” or the “Company”), is a trusted supplier of enriched uranium for nuclear fuel and services for the nuclear power industry.industry, which provides a reliable source of carbon-free energy. References to “Centrus”, the “Company”, “our”, or “we” include Centrus Energy Corp. and its wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the predecessor to Centrus, unless the context otherwise indicates. We were incorporated in 1998 as part of the privatization of the United States Enrichment Corporation.


Centrus operates two business segments: (a) low-enriched uranium (“LEU”), which supplies various components of nuclear fuel to utilities,commercial customers from our global network of suppliers, and (b) technical solutions, which provides advanced engineering, design, and manufacturing services to government and private sector customers. The technical solutions segment was formerly our contract services segment. The segment was renamed the technical solutions segment on December 31, 2019, to better reflect the nature of work performedcustomers and is consistent with our marketingdeploying uranium enrichment and other capabilities necessary for production of service offerings as Centrus Technical Solutions. There was no changeadvanced nuclear fuel to power existing and next-generation reactors around the composition of the segment as a result of the re-naming.world.


Our LEU segment provides most of the Company’s revenue and involves the sale of LEU, its components, and naturalenriched uranium for nuclear fuel to customers that are primarily utilities operatingwhich operate commercial nuclear power plants. The majority of these sales are for the enrichment component of LEU, which is measured in separative work units (“SWU”). Centrus also sells natural uranium (the raw material needed to produce LEU) and occasionally sells LEU with the natural uranium, uranium conversion, and SWU components combined into one sale.

LEU is a critical component in the production of nuclear fuel for reactors that produce electricity. We supply LEU and its components to both domestic and international utilities for use in nuclear reactors worldwide. We provide LEU from multiple sources, including our inventory, medium-medium and long- termlong-term supply contracts, and spot purchases. As a long-term supplier of LEU to our customers, our objective is to provide value through the reliability and diversity of our supply sources. Our long-term goal is to resume commercial enrichment production, and we are exploring approaches to that end.


Our global order book includes long-term sales contracts with major utilities to 2029. We have secured cost-competitive supplies of SWU under long-term contracts through the end of this decade to allow us to fill our existing customer orders and make new sales. A market-related price reset provision in our largest supply contract took effect at the beginning of 2019 – when market prices for SWU were near historic lows – which has significantly lowered our cost of sales and contributed to improved margins.

In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”) reached agreement with the Russian Federation on an extension of the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement, a trade agreement which allows for Russian-origin nuclear fuel to be exported to the United States in limited quantities, with an import quantity in each year. The two parties agreed to extend the agreement through 2040 and to set aside a significant portion of the quota for Centrus’ shipments to the United States through 2028 to execute our long-term supply (purchase) agreement (the “TENEX Supply Contract”) with the Russian government entity, TENEX, Joint-Stock Company (“TENEX”). This outcome also allows sufficient quota for Centrus to continue serving its utility customers. Refer to Item 1A Risk Factors - Operational Risks for further discussion.

Under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”), our technical solutions segment utilizesis deploying uranium enrichment and other capabilities necessary for production of advanced nuclear fuel to meet the evolving needs of the global nuclear industry and the U.S. government. We also are leveraging our unique technical expertise, operational experience, and specialized facilities that we developed over nearly two decades as part of our uranium enrichment technology program. We are leveraging these capabilities to expand and diversify our business beyond uranium enrichment, offering new services to existing and new customers in complementary markets.


With the specialized capabilities and workforce at our Technology and Manufacturing Center in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, we are performing
5



Our technical engineering and manufacturing services for a range of commercial and government customers and activelysolutions segment is working to secure new customers. Our experience developing, licensing, manufacturing and operating advanced nuclear components and systems positions us to provide critical design, engineering, manufacturing and other services to a broad range of potential clients, including those involving sensitive or classified technologies. This work includes design, engineering, manufacturing and licensing services support for advanced reactor and fuel fabrication projects as well as decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D”) work.

With several decades of experience in enrichment, we continue to be a leader in the development of an advanced U.S.restore America’s domestic uranium enrichment technology, which we believe couldcapability, to play a critical role in supplying fuel for advanced reactors, meeting U.S. national security and energy security needs,requirements, in advancing America’s nonproliferation objectives and achieving our nation’sin delivering the next-generation nuclear fuels that will power the future of nuclear energy as it provides reliable carbon-free power around the world.

The United States has not had domestic uranium enrichment capability suitable to meet U.S. national security requirements since the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (“Paducah GDP”) shut down in 2013. Longstanding U.S. policy and binding nonproliferation objectives.agreements prohibit the use of foreign-origin enrichment technology for U.S. national security missions. Our AC100M centrifuge currently is the only deployment-ready U.S. uranium enrichment technology that can meet these national security requirements, albeit requiring one minor change in sourcing of materials.


On October 31, 2019, we signed a three-year cost-share contract (the “HALEU Contract”) with DOECentrus is working to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstratepioneer U.S. production of high-assay, low-enriched uraniumHigh-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (“HALEU”) fuel with existing United States origin enrichment technology and provide DOE with HALEU, enabling the deployment of a new generation of HALEU-fueled reactors to meet the world’s growing need for near term use in its research and development for the advancement of civilian nuclear energy and national security, as well as other programmatic missions. The program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when the Company and DOE signed a preliminary agreement that allowed work to begin while the HALEU Contract was being finalized.


Under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million. The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs incurred above these amounts. Costs under the HALEU Contract include program costs, including direct labor and materials and associated indirect costs that are classified as Cost of Sales, and an allocation of corporate costs supporting the program that are classified as Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Services to be provided over the three-year contract include constructing and assembling centrifuge machines and related infrastructure in a cascade formation. When estimates of remaining program costs to be incurred for such an integrated, construction-type contract exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the remaining loss on the contract is recorded to Cost of Sales in the period the loss is determined. Our corporate costs supporting the program are recognized as expense as incurred over the duration of the contract term. As of December 31, 2019, the portion of our anticipated cost share under the HALEU Contract representing our share of remaining projected program costs was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million. The accrued loss on the contract will be adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results and remaining program cost projections.

carbon-free power. HALEU is a high-performance nuclear fuel component of an advanced nuclear reactor fuel thatwhich is not commercially available today and mayexpected to be required forby a number of advanced reactor and fuel designs currentlythat are now under development in both thefor commercial and government sectors. Existinguses. While existing reactors typically operate on LEU with the uranium-235 isotope concentration below 5%., HALEU has ais further enriched so that the uranium-235 concentration rangingis between 5% and 20%. The higher U-235 concentration offers a number of potential advantages, which may include better fuel utilization, improved performance, fewer refueling outages, simpler reactor designs, reduced waste volumes, and greater nonproliferation resistance.

The lack of a domestic HALEU supply is widely viewed as a major obstacle to the successful commercialization of these new reactors. As the only company with a license from 5%the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) to enrich up to 20%, giving uranium-235 assay HALEU, Centrus is uniquely positioned to fill a critical gap in the supply chain and facilitate the deployment of these promising next-generation reactors.

The DOE has experienced a COVID-19 related supply chain delay in obtaining the HALEU storage cylinders. Since it several potential technicalis not possible to begin HALEU production without the storage cylinders, it would not be possible to complete the operational portion of the demonstration before the June 1, 2022 expiration date of the existing contract. As a result, the DOE elected to change the scope of the existing contract and economic advantages. For example,move the higher concentrationoperational portion of uranium-235 meansthe demonstration to a new, competitively-awarded, contract that fuel assemblieswould provide for operations beyond the term of the existing contract. On February 7, 2022, the DOE issued a pre-solicitation notice for a request for proposal to complete the HALEU demonstration facility and reactors can be smallerto produce HALEU, noting that the “the Administration supports longer-term demonstration of production capability.” The pre-solicitation notice outlines a two-phase approach. Phase 1 consists of completing installation of the centrifuges – which DOE expects will take up to one year from contract signing – followed by one full year of cascade operations. Phase 2 consists of three optional, 3-year extensions to produce HALEU, so that the prospective contract could help support a total of one to ten years of cascade operations in addition to completing construction and reactorscentrifuge installation.

Centrus believes it is well-positioned to compete for a follow-on contract to operate the machines in our facility near Piketon but there is no assurance that DOE will require less frequent refueling. Reactors can also achieve higher “burnup” rates, meaningaward such a smaller volume of fuelcontract to the Company. Congress has not yet adopted a Fiscal Year 2022 appropriations bill for the DOE, and there is no assurance that the proposed program will be required overallapproved and less waste will be produced.funded.

The U.S. government has been operating under a series of continuing resolutions in Fiscal Year 2022. The DOE continues to support the HALEU may also be usedprogram during the continuing resolution period, and has incrementally increased the government’s cost share ceiling as funds have become available.

Additional COVID-19-related impacts, delays in the futureDOE furnishing equipment, or changes to fabricate next-generation fuel forms for the existing fleetscope of reactorsthe HALEU Contract could result in further material increases to our estimate of the United Statescosts required to complete the existing HALEU Contract, and arounddelay completion of the world. These new HALEU-based fuelscontract. The Company currently does not have a contractual obligation to perform work in excess of the funding provided by DOE and, therefore, no additional costs
6


have been accrued as of December 31, 2021. If DOE does not commit to fully fund the additional costs, and the Company nevertheless commits to a plan to complete the remaining activities of the HALEU Contract, we may incur material additional costs or losses in future periods that could improve the economics of nuclear reactorshave an adverse impact on our financial condition and inherent safety features while increasing the amount of electricity that can be generated at existing reactors. HALEU fuel may also ultimately be used in new commercial and government applications in the future, such as reactors for the military.liquidity.

We believe our investment in the HALEU technology will position the Company to meet the needs of ourgovernment and commercial customers in the future as they deploy advanced reactors and next generation fuels. ByAt present, there are a number of advanced reactors under development. For example, nine of the ten advanced reactor designs selected by the DOE for its Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program will require HALEU.In addition, the first non-light water reactor to begin active NRC-license review requires HALEU.The U.S. Department of Defense also plans to construct a prototype HALEU-fueled mobile microreactor in the next three to four years as part of a program called “Project Pele.”The U.S. Air Force also announced plans to deploy a microreactor at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska.While the use of HALEU is not an express requirement of the Air Force program, the vast majority of microreactor designs are expected to need HALEU. On December 14, 2021, DOE issued a request for information related to a potential program to fund the availability of HALEU.

Advanced nuclear reactors promise to provide an important source of reliable carbon-free power. While there is no commercial market for HALEU today, we believe that by investing in HALEU technology now, and as the only domestically-ownedAmerican-based company withcurrently pursuing HALEU enrichment capability we believeand possessing an NRC license for such production, the Company could be well positioned to capitalize on a potential new market as the demand for HALEU basedHALEU-based fuels increases in the mid to late-2020s with the development of advanced reactors. ThereHowever, there are no guarantees about whether or when government or commercial demand for HALEU will materialize, and there are a number of technical, regulatory, and economic hurdles that must be overcome for these fuels and reactors to come to the market.

In 2019, our management team led Also, foreign government-owned and operated competitors could seek to enter the Company’s successful effortsmarket and offer HALEU at more competitive prices. There is one known foreign government-owned entity which currently has the capability to add new sales and customersproduce HALEU, although this entity is currently subject to trade restrictions that limit the LEU order book, reduce costs, expand into new areasamount of the nuclear fuel cycle, and maintain our position as a trusted partner to the global nuclear industry and return value to our shareholders. Our competitive strengths include:

Developing fuel for the next generation of reactors: In 2019, we finalized an agreement to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU with existing United States origin enrichment technology and provide DOE with HALEU for near term use in its research and development for the advancement of civilian nuclear energy and security, and other programmatic missions. The program leverages our domestic enrichment and advanced manufacturing experience to demonstrate uranium enrichment at levels not commercially available today thatmaterial from this source which may be requiredimported into the United States. Other foreign government owned entities which are not currently subject to U.S. trade restrictions, however, may enter the market. One such foreign government owned entity has expressed an interest in and potential capability for a number of advanced reactor designs currently under development in bothHALEU production but has not committed publicly to enter the commercial and government sectors.

Enrichment technology development: We continuedmarket to advance our centrifuge technology in specialized facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee to support potential future government and/or commercial use and ensureenrich above 10% uranium-235 enrichment assays. This entity has indicated publicly that it remains readywould take six to seven years to be deployed.
able to produce HALEU.




Positioned for the long term: We have long-term nuclear fuel sales and supply contracts in place that extend to 2030; these contracts will provide a stream of revenue for many years and provide a foundation for growth. Because we do not have the large capital and overhead costs of a commercial production facility, we are positioned to continue to obtain supply of LEU from an oversupplied market experiencing prices near their historic lows, which we believe will strengthen our position for the future.

Diverse supply portfolio: In 2019, we continued our efforts to diversify and expand our sources of supply and improve our logistics for delivery of enriched uranium. For example, we acquired access to additional enriched uranium supply from the excess inventories of utility operators of nuclear power plants and from other primary and secondary sources of enriched uranium supply. Our strategy is to remain a highly diversified and reliable supplier of LEU with the flexibility to meet the evolving needs of our customers and effectively compete in the marketplace.

We believe that our position as a leading provider of enriched uranium and our long-standing global relationships will enable us to increase our future market share in the nuclear fuel market and support our growth into complementary areas of the nuclear and other industries. We are well-positioned to capitalize on our heritage, industry-wide relationships, and diversity of supply to provide reliable and competitive sources of nuclear fuel and related services. Centrus continues to be valued by our customers as a source of diversity, stability, and competition in the enrichment market.

Nevertheless, both the LEU and the technical solutions segments of our business face considerable challenges. The nuclear industry in general, and the nuclear fuel industry in particular, is in a period of significant change, which continues to affect the competitive landscape. In the years following the 2011 Fukushima accident, the published market prices for uranium enrichment declined more than 75%. While the monthly price indicators gradually started to increase beginning in late 2018, the uranium enrichment segment of the nuclear fuel market remains oversupplied and faces uncertainty about future demand for nuclear power generation. For further details, refer to Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Conditions and Outlook.

Changes in the competitive landscape affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, and create uncertainty. To address these changes, we have taken steps to adjust our cost structure and may seek further adjustments to our cost structure and operations and to evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

We are also actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which could involve, without limitation, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies or changes to our capital structure. In connection with any such transaction, we may seek additional debt or equity financing, contribute or dispose of assets, assume additional indebtedness, or partner with other parties to consummate a transaction.
For a discussion of the potential risks and uncertainties facing our business, see Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.




Low Enriched Uranium


LEU consists of two components: separative work units (“SWU”) and natural uranium. Revenue from our LEU segment is derived primarily from:
sales of the SWU component of LEU,
sales of both the SWU and natural uranium components of LEU, and
sales of natural uranium.


Revenue for ourOur LEU segment accounted for approximately 81%62% of our total revenue in 2019.2021. Our customers are primarily domestic and international utilities that operate nuclear power plants. Our agreements with electric utilities are primarily medium and long-term, fixed-commitment contracts under which our customers are obligated to purchase a specified quantity of the SWU component of LEU from us. Our agreements for natural uranium and enriched uranium product sales, where we sell both the SWU and uranium component of LEU, are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts.


7


Uranium and Enrichment


Uranium is a naturally occurring element and is mined from deposits located in Kazakhstan, Canada, Australia, and several other countries, including the United States. According to the World Nuclear Association (“WNA”), there are adequate measured resources of natural uranium to fuel nuclear power at current usage rates for about 90 years. In its natural state, uranium is principally comprised of two isotopes: uranium-235 (“U235”) and uranium-238 (“U238”). The concentration of U235 in natural uranium is only 0.711% by weight. Uranium enrichment is the process by which the concentration of U235 is increased. Most commercial nuclear power reactors require LEU fuel with a U235 concentration greater than natural uranium andof up to 5% by weight. Future reactor designs currently under development will likely require higher U235 concentration levels of up to 20%. Uranium enrichment is the process by which the concentration of U235 is increased.


SWU is a standard unit of measurement that represents the effort required to transform a given amount ofsort natural uranium into two components:between enriched uranium having a higher percentage of U235 and depleted uranium having a lower percentage of U235. The SWU contained in LEU is calculated using an industry standard formula based on the physics of enrichment. The amount of enrichment deemed to be contained in LEU under this formula is commonly referred to as its SWU component and the quantity of natural uranium deemed to be contained in LEU under this formula is referred to as its uranium or “feed” component.


While in some cases customers purchase both the SWU and uranium components of LEU from us, utility customers typically provide the natural uranium to us as part of their enrichment contracts and in exchange we deliver LEU to these customers and charge for the SWU component. Title to natural uranium provided by customers generally remains with the customer until delivery ofCentrus delivers the LEU, at which time title to LEU is transferred to the customer, and we takeCentrus takes title to the natural uranium.


The following outlines the steps for converting natural uranium into LEU fuel, commonly known as the nuclear fuel cycle:


Mining and Milling. Natural, or unenriched, uranium is removed from the earth in the form of ore and then crushed and concentrated.
Conversion. Uranium concentrates (“U3O8”) are combined with fluorine gas to produce uranium hexafluoride (“UF6”), a solid at room temperature and a gas when heated. UF6 is shipped to an enrichment plant.
Enrichment. UF6 is enriched in a process that increases the concentration of the U235 isotope in the UF6 from its natural state of 0.711% up to 5%, or LEU, which is usable as a fuel for current light water commercial nuclear power reactors. Future commercial reactor designs may use uranium enriched up to 20% U235, or HALEU.


Fuel Fabrication. LEU is then converted to uranium oxide and formed into small ceramic pellets by fabricators. The pellets are loaded into metal tubes that form fuel assemblies, which are shipped to nuclear power plants. As the advanced reactor market develops, HALEU may be converted to uranium oxide, metal, chloride or fluoride salts, or other forms and loaded into a variety of fuel assembly types optimized for the specific reactor design.
Nuclear Power Plant. The fuel assemblies are loaded into nuclear reactors to create energy from a controlled chain reaction. Nuclear power plants generate approximately 20% of U.S. electricity and 11%10% of the world’s electricity.
Used Fuel Storage. After the nuclear fuel has been in a reactor for several years its efficiency is reduced and the assembly is removed from the reactor’s core. The used fuel is warm and radioactive and is kept in a deep pool of water for several years. Many utilities have elected to then move the used fuel into steel or concrete and steel casks for interim storage.


8


LEU Segment Order Book


Our order book of sales under contract in the LEU segment (“order book”) extends to 2030. As of2029. For the years ended December 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, our order book was $1.0 billion.approximately $986 million and $960 million, respectively. The order book is the estimated aggregate dollar amount of revenue for future SWU and uranium deliveries, and includes $0.3 billionapproximately $348.2 million of deferred revenue and advances from customers as of December 31, 2019,2021, whereby customers have made advance payments to be applied against future deliveries. We anticipate our SWU and uranium revenue from sales currently under contract inestimate that approximately 3% of our order book will be in a range of $110 millionis at risk related to $120 million during 2020. As of December 31, 2018, our order book was $1.0 billion. In 2019, new contracts signed offset the impact of completed deliveries.customer operations.


Most of our customer contracts provide for fixed purchases of SWU during a given year. Our estimate of the order book estimate is based partially based on customers’ estimates of the timing and size of their fuel requirements and other assumptions that are subject to change. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, the customer may be able to increase or decrease the quantity delivered within an agreed range. Our order book estimate is also based on our estimates of selling prices, which may be subject to change. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, prices may be adjusted based on escalation using a general inflation index, published SWU price indicators prevailing at the time of delivery, and other factors, all of which are variable. We use external composite forecasts of future market prices and inflation rates in our pricing estimates. Refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, for a discussion of risks related to our order book.


Suppliers


We have a diverse base of supply that includes:
existing inventory of LEU (refer to Note 4, Inventories),
mid-mid-term and long-term contracts with enrichment producers,
purchases and loans from secondary sources including fabricators and utility operators of nuclear power plants that have excess inventory, and
spot purchases of SWU, uranium and uranium.LEU.


We have and will seekaim to continue to further diversify this base of supply and take advantage of the opportunities to obtain additional short and long-term supplies of LEU.
Currently, our largest suppliers of SWU are the Russian government entity TENEX Joint-Stock Company (“TENEX”) and the French government owned company Orano Cycle (“Orano”).




Under an agreement withthe TENEX (the “Russian Supply Agreement”),Contract, we purchase SWU contained in LEU, received from TENEX, and we deliver natural uranium to TENEX for the LEU’s uranium component. The RussianTENEX Supply Agreement was originally signed with commitmentsContract extends through 2022 but was modified in 2015 to give us the right to reschedule certain quantities of SWU of the original commitments into the period 2023 and beyond, in return for the purchase of additional SWU in those years.2028. We have exercised our right to reschedule deliveries through 2028 when the Russian Supply Agreement is scheduled to terminate.
Under the Russian Supply Agreement, wetypically pay for the SWU contained in the LEU, delivered to us, and either supply natural uranium to TENEX for the natural uranium content of the LEU or, in limited cases, pay for such content.component. SWU pricing is determined by a formula that uses a combination of market-related price points and other factors. The LEU that we obtain from TENEX under the RussianTENEX Supply AgreementContract currently is currently subject to quotas and other restrictions under an agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation governing exports of Russian uranium products to the United States.States (the “RSA”). This agreement is scheduledextends through 2040 under an amendment signed in October 2020 by the DOC and the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation (“ROSATOM”).The October 2020 amendment provides quotas for shipments of Russian uranium products to expire as of December 31, 2020, but the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”) has proposed to extend the agreement on terms that may not expressly protect our ability to import LEU into the United States after 2020, under the Russian Supply Agreement. Further, although we expect an extension of this agreement would include quotas for imports of Russian uranium products after 2020, the Russian Supply Agreement does not require TENEX to provide us the right to use any or all of the post-2020 quotas potentially resulting from any agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation. If the Russian Supply Agreement is not protected from new quotas, we will have limited opportunities to sell the SWU in the LEU that we are obligated to order from TENEX under the Russian Supply Agreement. We may request that TENEX make quota available to us, sell the SWU in foreign markets or secureallocates a deferral or cancellation of our purchase obligations under the Russian Supply Agreement; however, the likelihood of any or all of these alternatives is not known. In past circumstances involving similar negotiations between the United States and the Russian Federation, we have successfully agreed with TENEX to either secure additional quota or defer our contractual obligations to TENEX, but TENEX’s willingness to enter into such agreements in the future, or the cost to us of securing their consent to such agreements, is not known. Moreover, unless the DOC agrees in its proposed extension of the trade agreement to increase the quotas available to cover imports into the United States of LEU under all of TENEX’s contracts for sales to its U.S. customers and all of its sales to us under the Russian Supply Agreement, TENEX may not have sufficient quota available to allocate to all of its contract parties, including Centrus, to meet their needs.

TENEX may ultimately elect not to accept the terms offered by the DOC for an extension of the trade agreement. Depending upon the outcome of a pending administrative review of the existing agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation, the DOC may elect to terminate the agreement and restart a pending anti-dumping investigation of Russian imports of uranium products that was suspended in 1992, when the agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation was first signed. If the anti-dumping investigation is restarted, importers of Russian LEU, including the Company, could be required, pending the final outcome of the investigation, to deposit funds with the U.S. government to cover potential duties equal to over 115% of the value of the LEU that would owed if the investigation results in a final antidumping order,. The requirement to deposit those funds to cover potential duties would significantly increase our cost of importing Russian LEU during the pending investigation and, if the investigation results in an antidumping order that imposes duties, on a going-forward basis, to such an extent that we could not afford to import the LEU that we are obligated to order from TENEX, potentially threatening our key source of supply. Refer below to -Competition and Foreign Trade - Limitations on Imports of LEU from Russia.

Given these consequences, we are actively seeking to ensure that any extension of the trade agreement with Russia protects the Russian Supply Agreement and does not terminate the suspension of the antidumping investigation on terms that would require the deposit of funds to cover potential duties.

Subject to securing new customer contracts in challenging overseas markets, including markets protected by formal and informal trade barriers, we expect that asubstantial portion of the quotas through 2028 to Centrus for use under the TENEX Supply Contract to supply LEU for use in U.S. reactors. These quotas will allow us to continue to supply Russian LEU that we order during the termto our U.S. customers through 2028. The terms of the Russian Supply Agreement will need to be delivered to customers who will use it in foreign reactors. The Russian LEU that we deliver to foreign customers can be delivered either at fabrication facilitiesRSA, as extended, were also adopted into law by the U.S. Congress in the United States or inConsolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. Refer to Item 1A Risk Factors - Operational Risks for further discussion.



9


foreign countries.
The amount of SWU we must purchase from TENEX under the RussianTENEX Supply AgreementContract exceeds our current sales order book and, therefore, we will need to make new sales to place all the Russian LEU we must order to meet our SWU purchase obligations to TENEX. In addition, dueAlthough the quotas cover most of the LEU that we must order to quotas and other limitations, not all offulfill our deliverypurchase obligations under our existing contracts canthe TENEX Supply Contract, we expect that a small portion of the Russian LEU that we order during the term of the TENEX Supply Contract will need to be met with Russian LEU.delivered to customers who will use it in non-U.S. reactors.


We also have an agreement with Orano (the “Orano Supply Agreement”) with Orano for the long-term supply of SWU contained in LEU, nominally commencing in 2023. Under the Orano Supply Agreement, we will purchase SWU contained in LEU received from Orano, and then deliver natural uranium to Orano for the natural uranium feed material component of LEU. We havehad the option to extend the six-year purchase period for an additional two years.years and have recently elected to take the additional supply in 2029. The Orano Supply Agreement provides significant flexibility to adjust purchase volumes, subject to annual minimums and maximums, in fixed amounts that vary year by year. The pricing for the SWU purchased by usSWU is determined by a formula that uses a combination of market-related price points and other factors, and is subject to certain floors and ceilings. Prices are payable in a combination of U.S. dollars and euros.


We procure LEU from other sources under short-term and long-term contracts and have inventories available that diversify our supply portfolio and provide flexibility to help us meet the needs of our customers. We also have agreements to borrow SWU which we can use to optimize our purchases and deliveries over time.


Market prices for SWU fell substantially in the aftermath of the nuclear incident at Fukushima, Japan in 2011.2011, bottoming out in August of 2018. While prices have been rising, they are still lower than market prices prior to Fukushima. Recent purchases of SWU and our long-term contract with Orano reflect this decline inthese lower market prices. We signed our large, long-term supply agreement with TENEX in 2011. PricesAdditionally, prices under the RussianTENEX Supply Agreement alsoContract have been adjusted to reflect lower market prices based on a one-time market related price reset that was agreed to when we signed the contract in 2011. The reset occurred in 2018, reducing the unit cost per SWU for our purchases we made infrom 2019 and will make for the duration of the contract.through 2028.


Technical Solutions


Our technical solutions segment reflects our technical, manufacturing, engineering, and operations services offered to public and private sector customers, including the American Centrifuge engineering and testing activities we have performed as a contractor for UT-Battelle LLC (“UT-Battelle”),the contractor operating the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and operations services being performed under the HALEU Contract. With our private sector customers, we seek to leverage our domestic enrichment experience, engineering know-how and precision manufacturing facility to assist customers with a range of engineering, design and advanced manufacturing projects, including the production of fuel for next-generation nuclear reactors and the development of related facilities. Refer to Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - COVID-19 Update.


We have a long record as a global leader in advanced technology, manufacturing and engineering. Our manufacturing, engineering and testing facilities and our highly-trained workforce are deeply engaged in developing advanced nuclear fuel solutions, providing engineering and precision manufacturing services, and advancing the next generation of uranium enrichment technology.
10



We are exploring a number of options for returning to domestic production in the future.The economics for commercial deployment of new enrichment capacity are severely challenged by the current supply/demand imbalance in the market for LEU and related downward pressure on market prices for SWU, which reached a historic low in 2018 and have since gradually started to increase, as described above.

Government Contracting


On October 31, 2019, we signed the three-year cost-share HALEU Contract with DOE to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU for advanced reactors. The three-year program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when the Company and DOE signed an interim HALEU letter agreement that allowed work to begin while the full contract was being finalized.



Under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million. The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs incurred above these amounts. As described in Overview above, the portion of our anticipated cost share under the HALEU Contract representing our share of remaining projected program costs was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million as of December 31, 2019. The accrued loss on the contract will be adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results and remaining program cost projections.The HALEU Contract is incrementally funded and DOE is currently obligated for costs up to approximately $53.2 million of the $115 million. The Company received cash payments of $10.7 million through December 31, 2019.

Over the past five years, our government contracts with UT-Battelle We have provided for engineering and testing work on the American Centrifuge technology at our facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Our completed fixed-price contract with UT-Battelle for the period from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, generated revenue of approximately $16.0 million upon completion of defined milestones. Although the contract expired September 30, 2018, we continued to perform work on a limited basis towards the expected milestones as the parties worked toward a successor agreement. A successor fixed-price agreement was entered into with UT-Battelle in September 2019 and was completed in 2019 resulting in revenue of $1.2 million. In February 2020, an additional $4.4 million fixed-price agreement was entered into with UT-Battelle with a milestone deliverable in the second quarter of 2020.

We continue to investsignificantly invested in advanced technology because of the potential for future growth into new areas of business for the Company, while also preserving our unique workforce at our Technology and Manufacturing Center in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

On September 27, 2018, we leveragedTennessee, and our D&D experience andproduction facility near Piketon, Ohio. The Company entered into an agreementthis cost-share contract with DOE as a critical first step on the road back to decontaminate and decommission the K-1600 facility located atcommercial production of enriched uranium, which the East Tennessee Technology ParkCompany had terminated in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Under2013 with the termsclosure of the agreement, pursuantPaducah GDP. The HALEU Contract, if fully implemented, is expected to result in the Company having readied the 16-machine cascade to enrich uranium to the 20% concentration in the uranium-235 isotope that is required by many of the advanced reactor concepts now under development. Centrus is currently the only company with an NRC license to enrich uranium up to the 20% concentration that is contained in HALEU.

In 2019, under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a work authorizationmaximum of $115 million (which was recently increased to $126.7 million, as noted below). The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs the Company elects to incur above these amounts. Costs under our lease with DOE, we were required to removethe HALEU Contract include program costs, including internal labor, third-party services and dispose of government owned materials, and equipment in orderassociated indirect costs that are classified as Cost of Sales, and an allocation of corporate costs supporting the program that are classified as Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Services to renderbe provided over the facility radiologically uncontaminatedthree-year contract include constructing and unclassified. The contract was a cost-plus fixed fee contract totaling approximately $15 million. The Company announced that it had successfully completed decontaminationassembling centrifuge machines and decommissioningrelated infrastructure, and training and qualifying the workforce for operation of the facilityfacility. When estimates of total costs for such an integrated, construction-type contract exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the remaining loss on October 9, 2019. In connection with the substantial completioncontract is recorded to Cost of Sales in the period the loss is determined. Our corporate costs supporting the program are recognized as expense, as incurred over the duration of the work,contract term. The accrued loss on the contract is being adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results, remaining program cost projections, and the Company’s anticipated cost-share.

Further, while we terminated our lease withstill anticipate completing construction of the cascade in 2022, due to a COVID-19 related supply chain delay in the DOE-supplied HALEU storage cylinders, production will commence under another contract that the DOE plans to compete later this year. The U.S. government has been operating under a series of continuing resolutions in Fiscal Year 2022. The DOE continues to support the HALEU program during the continuing resolution period, and has incrementally increased the government’s cost share ceiling as funds have become available. Currently, DOE has provided incremental funding, and increased the government’s cost share ceiling to $126.7 million. For further discussion, refer to Item 7, Management Discussion and Analysis, of this 10-K report.

Our HALEU Contract expires June 1, 2022, and although we believe demand for HALEU will emerge over the K-1600 facility on September 30, 2019.next several years, there are no guarantees about whether or when government or commercial demand for HALEU will materialize, and there are a number of technical, regulatory and economic hurdles that must be overcome for these fuels and reactors to come to the market.

In addition, we have entered into other contracts with DOE, other agencies and their contractors to provide engineering, design and manufacturing services.
Commercial Contracting


In March 2018, we entered into atwo services agreementagreements with X Energy, LLC (“X-energy”)X-energy to provide X-energy with (i) technical and resource support for criticality safety evaluation of processing equipment,the conceptual and preliminary design of freshits Tri-Structural Isotropic (“TRISO”) fuel transport packages, and conceptual mock-upmanufacturing process. Both of a nuclear fuel production facility and (ii) non-cash in-kind contributions subject to a cooperative agreement between X-energy and the United States government. The services were performed pursuant to separate task orders issued under the agreement. The initial task orders ran through December 31, 2018, and provided for time-and-materials based pricing with payments to be made to us totaling approximately $4.4 million.these contracts have been completed. In addition, we contributed non-cash in-kind contributions with a value of approximately $2.5 million. In January 2020, we extended the period of performance through June 30, 2020 which resulted in revised total payments to be made to us of approximately $4.6 million and non-cash in-kind contributions to be provided by us with a value of approximately $2.6 million.


In November 2018,August 2021, we entered into a secondnew services agreement with X-energy to provide X-energy with (i) technical and resource support todesign services for detailed design of the design and license application development of its nuclearTRISO fuel productionmanufacturing facility and (ii) non-cashvarious support services for establishing their TRISO Research and Development Center. The task orders under the new agreement may include in-kind contributions subject to a cooperative agreement between X-energy and the United States government. The services will be performed pursuant to separate task orders issued under the agreement. The initial task orders ran through September 30, 2019 with deliverables to be completed through November 30, 2019, and provided for time-and-materials based pricing with payments to be made to us totaling approximately $4.2 million. In addition,that we agreed toare not currently, but may provide, non-cash in-kind contributions with a value of approximately $2.4 million. In January 2020, we extended the second service agreement period of performance to June 30, 2020 with the addition of additional tasks orders which resulted in revised total payments to be made to us of approximately $7.3 million and non-cash in-kind contributions to be provided by us of approximately $3.9 million.at our discretion.


In addition, we have entered into other contracts for the engineering, design, and advanced manufacturing services with other commercial entities.
11




Competition and Foreign Trade


It is estimated that the enrichment industry market for commercial nuclear reactors powered by low enriched uranium (“LEU”) is currently about 50about 57.5 million SWU per year. Our global market share of enrichment for the LEU market is less than 5%. Global LEU suppliers in our highly competitive industry compete on the basis of price and reliability of supply. The four largest LEU suppliers comprise over 95% of market share combined:
Rosatom,ROSATOM, a Russian government entity, which sells LEU through its wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary TENEX;
Urenco, a consortium of companies owned or controlled by the British and Dutch governments and two German utilities;
Orano, a company largely owned by the French government that was formerly part of the French government owned company, AREVA;government; and
To a lesser extent, China Nuclear Energy Industry Corporation (“CNEIC”), a company owned by the Chinese government.

The production capacity for Rosatom/ROSATOM/TENEX is estimated by the World Nuclear Association to be approximately 2728.7 million SWU per year. Imports of LEU and other uranium products produced in the Russian Federation are subject to restrictions as described below under —Limitations on Imports of LEU from RussiaRussian Suspension Agreement.


Urenco reported installed capacity at its European and U.S. enrichment facilities of 18.619.6 million SWU per year at the end of 2018.2020.


Orano’s gas centrifuge enrichment plant in France began commercial operations in 2011 and the plant’s nominal capacity of 7.5 million SWU was reportedly in service at the end of 2016. Orano has reported that it has suspended planned capacity expansions beyond 7.5 million SWU.


CNEIC has emerged as a significant producer primarily focused on supplying domestic requirements in China. CNEIC’s commercial SWU production capacity is estimated to be approximately 6.810.7 million SWU per year in 2020.


All of our current competitors are owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by foreign governments, and operate enrichment technologies developed with the financial support of foreign governments. These competitors may make business decisions in both domestic and international markets that are influenced by political or economic policy considerations rather than exclusively by commercial considerations.

There are also producers of LEU in Japan and Brazil that primarily serve a portion of their respective domestic markets.




LEU also may also be produced by down-blending government stockpiles of highly-enriched uranium. Governments control the timing and availability of highly-enriched uranium released for this purpose, and the release of this material to the market could impact market conditions. Given the current oversupplied nuclear fuel market, any additional LEU from down-blended highly-enriched uranium released into the market would have a negative effect on prices for LEU.


Our LEU we supply to foreign customers is exported under the terms of international agreements governing nuclear cooperation between the United States and the government of the country of destination or other entities, such as the European Union or the International Atomic Energy Agency. The LEU supplied to us is subject to the terms of cooperation agreements between the country in which the material is produced and the country of destination or other entities.


12


Russian Suspension Agreement


Imports into the United States of LEU and other uranium products produced in the Russian Federation, including LEU imported by Centrus underunder the RussianTENEX Supply Agreement,Contract, are subject, through December 31, 2020,2040, to quotas imposed under U.S. legislation enacted into law in September 2008 and December 2020, and under the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement (“RSA”),RSA, as amended in 2008.2008 and 2020. These quotas limit the amount of Russian LEU that can be imported into the United States for U.S. consumption.consumption1.


The U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”)RSA is currently conducting an administrative review of the current status of, and compliance with, the RSA during the period October 2017 through September 2018 (the “Second Administrative Review”) and in December 2019, initiated another review of the period October 2018 through September 2019 (the “Third Administrative Review”). In an earlier review (the “First Administrative Review”), which covered the period October 2016 through September 2017 and was completed in December 2017,a trade agreement between the DOC found that TENEX, Centrus and others had complied with the terms of the RSA during the period of review, but deferred until the Second Administrative Review any decision on whether the RSA continues to meet the statutory requirements that the RSA (i) prevent the suppression or undercutting of price levels of domestic uranium products and (ii) continue to be in the public interest. In a preliminary determination in the Second Administrative Review, issued in December 2019, the DOC again found that Centrus and others had complied with the RSA, but again deferred making a determination on the statutory requirements, which it said would be addressed in a post-preliminary analysis, which has yet to be issued. A final determination in the Second Administrative Review is expected to be issued in June 2020.

If, in the final determination of the Second Administrative Review, the DOC finds evidence either of non-compliance with the RSA, or that the statutory requirements are no longer being met, it could terminate the RSA, reinitiate the antidumping investigation that the RSA suspended, and begin collecting duties in excess of 115% ad valorem on imports of Russian uranium products, including the LEU that the Company imports under the Russian Supply Agreement.

In February 2019, the DOC formally opened negotiations with the Russian Federation State Atomic Energy Corporation (Rosatom) with respect to a possible extension(“ROSATOM”) originally signed in 1992 suspended an anti-dumping duty investigation of the term of the RSA. In connection with these negotiations, the DOC is seeking a significant extension of the RSA. We are working with industry stakeholdersRussian uranium, and others to ensure that the extension will include sufficient quota to allow all existing contracts with TENEX, including the Russian Supply Agreement, to be fully implemented, but it is possible that the terms of the extension will not expressly protect our ability to import LEU under the Russian Supply Agreement or require that available quota be allocated to those imports. 

An extension of the RSA would continue the existing suspension of the antidumping investigation and therefore not require payment of the duties described above, as long as the suspension remained in place. Centrus does not currently have in place any agreement with TENEX to share quotas that may apply after 2020, when the existing quotas terminate. Unless the RSA extension provides for sufficient quota or other relief that would allow Centrus to deliver in the United States all the Russian LEU we procure under the Russian Supply Agreement, (i) our ability to meet our commitments under our order book and to obtain new sales commitments would be substantially


jeopardized, and (ii) our ability to earn revenues with the Russian LEU we are required to procure under the Russian Supply Agreement would be substantially reduced. As a result, we would lose both revenue and market share to our competitors.

Similarly, if, instead of an extension of the RSA, the DOC reached an adverse final determination in the Second Administrative Review and elected to restart the antidumping investigationimposed quantitative limits on exports of Russian uranium products, including LEU, we would be obligated to deposit funds with the DOCUnited States. Under an amendment signed on October 5, 2020, the RSA’s limits on shipments of Russian uranium product to cover potential duties and potentially pay antidumping duties on a going-forward basis (if the antidumping investigation resulted in an antidumping order) that would render the LEU containing the SWU that we purchase under the Russian Supply Agreement too expensive to place into the market. Such an outcome would cause us to incur significant losses in fulfilling our existing contracts, and make it commercially challenging to win new contracts using the Russian LEU.

Limitations on Imports of LEU from France

The DOC imposed an antidumping order on imports of French LEU in 2002, subject to periodic review by the DOC to determine if the order should be maintained in effect. In connection with its most recent view of the order, the DOC did not receive any notices that domestic parties intended to participate in the review. Consequently, the order was revoked in the March 2019. Since the revocation of the Order, material imported from France, including material imported by Centrus under its Orano contract, is no longer subject to tariffs.

Other Trade Actions

In July 2019, in response to a finding of the Secretary of Commerce that uranium was being imported in such quantities and under such circumstances that it threatened to impair the national security of the United States were extended through at least 2040. Additionally, under legislation passed by the President directedU.S. Congress shortly after the amendment was signed, the material terms of the extended RSA were enacted into law.

Under this law and the RSA, imports of Russian uranium products will peak in 2023 at 24% of the forecasted U.S. demand for enrichment and then begin to decline, reaching 15% by 2028. Despite the fact that overall limits will ramp down, the RSA extension agreement explicitly sets aside sufficient quota in 2021-2028 for Centrus. The RSA and the legislation provide for a high-levelrevision of the quotas in 2023, 2029, and 2035 to take account of SWU demand forecasts that will be published by the WNA in the future. Any quota adjustment or other change to the RSA could affect our ability to implement the TENEX Supply Contract through sales to customers who take delivery in the United States, which is our most significant market.

The actual size of the annual quotas allocated to Centrus for the TENEX Supply Contract are confidential, but a public version of the quotas shows that they represent a significant portion of the total quotas provided under the RSA in 2021-2028. The quotas provided for the TENEX Supply Contract are expected to be adequate to support the Company’s long-term strategic goals and to permit enriched uranium procured from TENEX during the remaining term of the TENEX Supply Contract to be imported to supply U.S. governmentutilities, thereby securing a key part of the Company’s supply base for the benefit of its customers and providing the revenues needed by the Company to support its work on HALEU and other advanced technology projects in the United States.

For further details, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - Our future prospects are tied directly to the nuclear fuel working group be formed to develop recommendations for revivingenergy industry worldwide, and expanding domestic nuclear fuel production.the financial difficulties experienced by, and operating conditions of, our customers and suppliers could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.


Other Actions Adversely Affecting International Trade
In 2018, in connection with the withdrawal by the United States from a 2015 multilateral agreement known as the “JointJoint Comprehensive Plan of Action” or JCPOA, (“JCPOA”) the U.S. government re-imposed sanctions on Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI)(“AEOI”) and a number of its subsidiaries. Waivers were granted to allow non-Iranian entities to continue to work on certain programs that, among other things, allowed affiliates of RosatomROSATOM to continue work at the Fordow enrichment planton nuclear projects in Iran. On October 29, 2019,These waivers have expired or been terminated and as a result, the U.S. government extended four of these waivers for 90 days, but in November 2019, the U.S. State Department announced that one of the four waivers that permitted Rosatom’s affiliates to continue work at the Fordow enrichment plant would terminate early, on December 15, 2019, in response to an announcement by Iran that it would enrich uranium at that facility. (The remaining three waivers were extended for an additional sixty days on January 31, 2020.) Termination of the waiver of sanctions that might have applied to Russian work at Fordow could have allowed the U.S. governmentdecide to impose sanctions on RosatomRussian entities that may be involved in nuclear work in Iran, including ROSATOM or its affiliates for conducting work at Fordow. In early December 2019, however, a Rosatom subsidiary announced that it was suspending work at the Fordow plant, thereby reducing the risk that Rosatom or its subsidiaries,subsidiaries. These sanctions could affect companies owned by ROSATOM, including TENEX, would be sanctioned.even if they are not doing work in Iran. To date, no sanctions have been imposed or announced on TENEX or its affiliate that producers LEU that would adversely affect our abilityany other ROSATOM subsidiary involved in the TENEX Supply Contract, in respect to implement the Russian Supply Agreement.

If TENEXwork of ROSATOM or its affiliatesubsidiaries in Iran.


1 The term “quota” is used herein for simplicity. The amounts of Russian uranium products that produces LEU for delivery under the Russian Supply Agreement were sanctioned and if the sanctions ultimately preclude the Company from purchasing LEU from TENEX, the Company would seek a license, waiver or other approval from the U.S. government to ensure that the Company could continue to fulfill its purchase and sales obligations. There is no assurance that such a license, waiver or approval wouldcan be granted. If a license, waiver or approval were not granted, the Company would need to look to alternative sources of LEU to replace the LEU that it could not procure from TENEX, andshipped to the extent these sources were insufficient or more expensive, it would adversely impact our business, results of operations,United States are referred to as export limits in the RSA and competitive position.import limits in the legislation, but from a practical perspective have identical effect.

13




DOE Facilities


We produced LEU through 2001 at the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (“Portsmouth GDP”) in Piketon, Ohio and through 2013 at the former Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (“Paducah GDP”)GDP in Paducah, Kentucky, which we had leased from DOE. We currently store our existing inventory at third partythird-party offsite licensed locations under agreements with the operators of those facilities. Our prior enrichment operations generated hazardous, low-level radioactive and mixed wastes. The storage, treatment, and disposal of wastes are regulated by federal and state laws. The treatment and disposal of wastes from our prior operations at the Paducah GDP were completed in 2016. Regarding our past operations at the former Portsmouth GDP DOE agreed in 2011 to accept ownership of all nuclear material at the site, some of which required processing for waste disposal. We agreed to pay DOE for costs for disposing of our share of such wastes. The treatment and disposal of wastes from our prior operations at the Portsmouth GDP were completed in 2017.

The Portsmouth and Paducah gaseous diffusion plantsGDP were operated by agencies of the U.S. government for more than 40 years prior to the creation of the Company through privatization of the Government enterprise in 1998. As a result of such operation, there are contamination and other potential environmental liabilities associated with the Government’s prior operation of the plants. The USEC Privatization Act and our former leases for the plants provide that DOE remains responsible for the decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D&D”) of the gaseous diffusion plants. Further, DOE continued operations andas well as cleanup activities, both during and subsequent, to our operations at the plants.facilities.

We lease facilities and related personal property innear Piketon, Ohio from DOE. In connection with a letter agreement that preceded the HALEU letter agreement,Contract, DOE and Centrus amended the lease agreement, which was scheduled to expire by its terms on June 30, 2019. The lease was renewed and extended until May 31, 2022. In September 2021, the Company and the DOE renewed and extended the lease until December 31, 2025. Any facilities or equipment constructed or installed under the HALEU Contract, or other contract with DOE will be owned by DOE and may be returned to DOE in an “as is” condition at the end of the lease term. DOE will be responsible for the D&D of any returned facilities or equipment. If we determine the equipment and facilities may benefit Centrus after completion of the HALEU program, we can extend the facility lease and ownership of the equipment will be transferred to us, subject to mutual agreement regarding D&D and other issues.

On September 27, 2018, we entered into an agreement with DOEissues, including those impacted by DOE’s recent decision to D&D the K-1600 facility of DOE located at the East Tennessee Technology Park. Under the termscompetitively award a separate contract for operations of the agreement, pursuantHALEU cascade following the expiration of our HALEU Contract, which may be awarded to a work authorization underthird party.

14



Human Capital Management

Our employees in Maryland, Ohio, and Tennessee are dedicated to our leasecorporate philosophy based in honesty, trust, and with DOE,the highest levels of integrity, safety and security. Every day these values drive how we wereoperate our business; govern how we interact with each other and our customers, partners, and suppliers; guide the way that we treat our workforce; and determine how we connect with our communities. Our commitment to ethical business practices is outlined in our Code of Business Conduct. Each employee is required to removeacknowledge receipt, understanding of, and disposecompliance with our standards.

Due to the highly specialized nature of government owned materialsour business we need to hire and equipment in ordertrain skilled and qualified personnel to render the facility non-contaminateddesign, build, and unclassified. On October 9, 2019, we announced the successful completionoperate our state of the D&Dart equipment, and to perform a broad range of services to support our country and our customers. Our work requires that we attract people who are dedicated to consistently performing quality work and, for many of our positions, are able to obtain a security clearance. We recognize that our success as a company depends on our ability to attract, develop, and retain such a workforce. We are dedicated to promoting the health, welfare and safety of our employees. Part of our responsibility includes treating all employees with dignity and respect and providing them with fair, market-based, competitive, and equitable compensation. We recognize and reward the performance of our employees in line with our pay-for-performance philosophy and provide a comprehensive suite of benefit options that enables our employees and their dependents to live healthy and productive lives.

Safety in our workplaces is paramount. We take measures to prevent workplace hazards, encourage safe behaviors and enforce a culture of continuous improvement to ensure our processes help eliminate incidents and injuries and comply with governing health and safety laws.

We are committed to promoting diversity of thought, experience, perspectives, backgrounds, and capabilities to drive innovation and to strengthen the solutions we deliver to our customers because we believe this diversity leads to better outcomes. We proudly support a culture of inclusion and encourage a work environment that respects diverse opinions, values individual skills, and celebrates the unique experiences our employees possess. To ensure a diverse group of candidates is considered for each opening we enlist the services of a Human Resource Consulting firm that provides services and products related to Affirmative Action Programs (“AAPs”) and equal employment opportunity as required by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”).

Our values motivate us to promote strong workplace practices with opportunities for development and training. Our training and development efforts focus on ensuring that the workforce is appropriately trained on critical job skills as well as leadership attributes that are consistent with our philosophy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we transitioned our headquarters staff to work from home. We have endeavored to maintain the highest levels of safety for our operations staff, who are in open offices, with enforcement of social distancing, face masks, and also 100% daily temperature screening. All non-bargaining unit employees of the facility. In connectionCompany, including those working from home, are either fully vaccinated (95%) against the COVID-19 virus or working with the substantial completion of the work, we terminated our lease with DOE for the K-1600 facility on September 30, 2019.accommodations (5%).

Employees


A summary of our employees by location is as follows:
 
No. of Employees
at December 31,
No. of Employees
at December 31,
Location 2019 2018Location20212020
Piketon, OHPiketon, OH115 107 
Oak Ridge, TN 104
 105
Oak Ridge, TN101 105 
Piketon, OH 69
 65
Bethesda, MD 53
 51
Bethesda, MD50 53 
Other 4
 5
Other— 
Total Employees 230
 226
Total Employees266 267 
 
15


On January 16, 2020, members of the United Steelworkers (“USW”) Local 689-5 ratified a new collective bargaining agreement for the employees represented by the USW at the advanced technology facility innear Piketon, Ohio. The contract term is through October 1, 2022.



16



Executive Officers
Executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Executive officers at March 26, 2020, follow:
as of December 31, 2021, are as follows:
NameAgePosition
Daniel B. Poneman6465President and Chief Executive Officer
Larry B. Cutlip6062Senior Vice President, Field Operations
Elmer W. Dyke56Senior Vice President, Business Operations and Chief Commercial Officer
Dennis J. Scott6062Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary 
Philip O. Strawbridge6567Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer
John M.A. Donelson5557Senior Vice President Sales and Chief Marketing Officer
Daniel B. Poneman has been President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2015 and was Chief Strategic Officer in March 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Poneman was Deputy Secretary of Energy from May 2009 to October 2014, in which capacity he also served as Chief Operating Officer of the U.S. Department of Energy.DOE. 
Larry B. Cutlip has been Senior Vice President, Field Operations since January 2018, was Vice President, Field Operations from May 2016 through December 2017, was Deputy Director of the American Centrifuge Project from January 2015 to May 2016, was Director, Centrifuge Manufacturing from April 2008 to December 2014, was Director, Program Management and Strategic Planning from December 2005 to April 2008, was Manager, Engineering from May 1999 to December 2005, and held positions in operations management and engineering at the Company and its predecessors since 1981.
Elmer W. Dyke has been Senior Vice President, Business Operations and Chief Commercial Officer since January 2018 and was Senior Vice President, Business Operations from September 2015 through December 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Dyke was a Senior Vice President of NAC International’s global consulting business and Vice President of International Sales from August 2010 to September 2015.
Dennis J. Scott has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary since January 2018 and was Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary from May 2016 through December 2017. Mr. Scott was Deputy General Counsel and Director, Corporate Compliance from April 2011 to May 2016, Acting Deputy General Counsel from August 2010 to April 2011, Assistant General Counsel and Director, Corporate Compliance from April 2005 to August 2010 and Assistant General Counsel from January 1994 to April 2005.
Philip O. Strawbridge has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer since September 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Strawbridge served as an executive adviser at Court Square Capital from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Strawbridge served in various executive positions including Chief Financial Officer at EnergySolutions, a nuclear services and technology company, from 2006 to 2010. He was Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of BNG America, which provided nuclear waste management services and technology to U.S. Government and commercial clients, from 1999 until BNG America was acquired by EnergySolutions in early 2006. 


John M.A. Donelson has been Senior Vice President Sales and Chief Marketing Officer since October 2019 and was Vice President, Sales and Chief Marketing Officer from January 2018 through October 2019. Mr. Donelson was Vice President, Marketing, Sales and Power from April 2011 through December 2017, Vice President, Marketing and Sales from December 2005 to April 2011, Director, North American and European Sales from June 2004 to December 2005, Director, North American Sales from August 2000 to June 2004 and Senior Sales Executive from July 1999 to August 2000.



17



Available Information
 
Our website is www.centrusenergy.com. We make available on our website, or upon request, without charge, access to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Our code of business conduct (the “Code of Business Conduct”) provides a brief summary of the standards of conduct that are at the foundation of our business operations. The codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct states that we conduct our business in strict compliance with all applicable laws. Each employee must read the codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct and sign a form stating that he or she has read, understands and agrees to comply with the codeCode of business conduct.Business Conduct. A copy of the codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct is available on our website or upon request without charge. We will disclose on the website any amendments to, or waivers from, the code of business conduct that are required to be publicly disclosed.
 
We also make available on our website or upon request, free of charge, our codeCode of business conduct,Business Conduct, Board of Directors Governance Guidelines, and our Board committee charters.




18


Item 1A. Risk Factors


The following discussion sets forth the material risk factors that could affect our financial condition and operations. Readers should not consider any descriptions of such factors to be a complete set of all potential risks that could affect us. Below,

War in Ukraine

The current war in Ukraine has led to the U.S., Russia and other countries imposing sanctions and other measures that restrict international trade. The situation is rapidly changing, and it is not possible to predict future actions that could be taken. The Company has multiple sources of supply; however, the supply contract with Tenex remains our largest source. At present, sanctions have not impacted the ability of the Company or TENEX to perform under the TENEX supply contract. Recently sanctions have been imposed by the U.S. on exports of fossil fuels. Russia has imposed sanctions on the export of commodities but does not include the export of LEU. Additional sanctions or other measures by the U.S. or foreign governments (including the Russian government) could be imposed. Any sanctions or measures directed at trade in LEU from Russia or the parties involved in such trade or otherwise could interfere with, or prevent, implementation of the TENEX Supply Contract. While the initial sanctions announced do not affect the ability of the Company or TENEX to implement the TENEX Supply Contract, the situation at this time is unpredictable and therefore there is no assurance that future developments would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s procurement, payment, delivery or sale of LEU under the TENEX Supply Contract.

If measures were taken to limit the supply of Russian LEU or to prohibit or limit dealings with Russian entities, including, but not limited to, TENEX or ROSATOM, the Company would seek a license, waiver or other approval from the government imposing such measures to ensure that the Company could continue to fulfill its purchase and sales obligations. There is no assurance that such a license, waiver, or approval would be granted. If a license, waiver or approval were not granted, the Company would need to look to alternative sources of LEU to replace the LEU that it could not procure from TENEX. The Company has contracts for alternative sources that could be used to mitigate a portion of the near term impacts. However, to the extent these sources were insufficient or more expensive or additional supply cannot be obtained, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and competitive position.

Economic and Industry Risks

Our future prospects are tied directly to the nuclear energy industry worldwide, and the financial difficulties experienced by, and operating conditions of, our customers and suppliers could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Potential events that could affect either our customers or suppliers under current or future contracts with us or the nuclear industry as a whole, include:
pandemics, armed conflicts (including the war in Ukraine), government actions and other events that disrupt supply chains, production, transportation, payments and importation of nuclear materials or other critical supplies or services;
natural or other disasters (such as the 2011 Fukushima disaster) impacting nuclear facilities or involving shipments of nuclear materials;
changes in U.S. or foreign government policies and priorities;
regulatory actions or changes in regulations by nuclear regulatory bodies applicable to us, our suppliers or our customers;
decisions by agencies, courts or other bodies under applicable trade and other laws applicable to us, our suppliers or our customers;
disruptions in other areas of the nuclear fuel cycle, such as uranium supplies or conversion;
civic opposition to, or changes in government policies regarding, nuclear operations;
business decisions concerning reactors or reactor operations;
19


the financial condition of reactor owners and operations;
the need for generating capacity; or
consolidation within the electric power industry.

These events could adversely affect us to the extent they result in a reduction or elimination of customers’ contractual requirements to purchase from us; the suspension or reduction of nuclear reactor operations; the reduction or blocking of supplies of raw materials, natural or enriched uranium or separative work units (SWU), lower demand, burdensome regulation, disruptions of shipments, production importation or payment (including the blocking or restriction of transportation services or hardware); increased competition from third parties; and increased costs or difficulties or increased liability for actual or threatened property damage or personal injury. Additionally, customers may face financial difficulties, including from factors unrelated to the nuclear industry, that could affect their willingness or ability to make purchases. We cannot provide any assurance that events will not preclude us from making deliveries to our customers, increase our costs or that our customers, suppliers, or contractors will not default on their obligations to us or file for bankruptcy protection. If a customer files for bankruptcy protection, for example, we describe certain important operational,likely would be unable to collect all, or even a significant portion, of amounts that are owed to us. A default and bankruptcy filing by one or more customers or suppliers, or events (such as government actions) which prevent or limit our ability to obtain or sell material or services, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Our business, financial and operating performance could be adversely affected by epidemics and other health related issues including but not limited to the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic.

The global outbreak of COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and a national emergency by the U.S. Government and has negatively affected the U.S. and global economies, disrupted supply chains, and has resulted in significant travel, transport, and other restrictions. The COVID-19 outbreak has disrupted the supply chains and day-to-day operations of the Company, our suppliers, our contractors, and our customers, which could materially adversely affect our operations. In this regard, global supply chains and the timely availability of products or product components sourced domestically or imported from other nations, including SWU contained in LEU we purchase, could be materially disrupted by quarantines, slowdowns or shutdowns, border closings, and travel restrictions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic or other global pandemic or health crises. Further, impacts of COVID-19 infections and other COVID-19 pandemic related impacts on our management and workforce, or our suppliers, contractors, or customers, could adversely impact our business. While we have taken steps to protect our workforce and carry on operations, we may not be able to mitigate all of the potential impacts. We anticipate increased costs related to, or resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic, due to, among other things, delays in supplier deliveries, impacts of travel restrictions, site access and quarantine requirements, and the impacts of remote work and adjusted work schedules.

The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been primarily affecting our technical solutions segment since much of the work required under the HALEU Contract must be performed on the Company’s sites and on our suppliers’ sites. As a result, our costs under the HALEU Contract have been impacted. Further, as a result of the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) not supplying us cylinders as required under the HALEU Contract, operation of the cascade has been deferred and will be performed under a subsequent competitively bid contract that may or may not be awarded to us.

In the event that the COVID-19 pandemic prevents our employees or our contractors from working in-person at our site or, our suppliers are unable to provide goods and services on the schedule we anticipated, the impacts on our schedule and costs could be material. Again, while we have worked to mitigate the impact, we are experiencing increased costs as the result of the impact of the pandemic on their operations.

We continue to work with our customers, employees, contractors, suppliers and communities to address the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and to take actions in an effort to mitigate adverse consequences. However, the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and financial performance in future periods,
20


including our ability to execute our strategic plan and legalprograms in the expected timeframe, remains uncertain and compliance risks.will depend on future pandemic related developments, including the duration of the pandemic and any potential subsequent variants of COVID-19 and related government actions to prevent and manage disease spread, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. The long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on us or on government budgets, our customers, contractors and suppliers that could impact our business are also difficult to predict but could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.


The continued excess supply of LEU in the market could adversely affect market prices and our business results.

Events related to the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami that caused irreparable damage to four reactors in Fukushima, Japan created an over-supply of nuclear fuel that continues to heavily influence market prices. In addition, reactor operators facing aggressive price competition from natural gas and subsidized renewable generation like wind and solar, have closed or are planning to close reactors, further reducing demand for our product and services. Despite the decrease in demand, some of our competitors supported by foreign governments continued to expand their capacity. Market uncertainty, and reduced demand, coupled with excess capacity and supply has adversely affected our ability to sell LEU and SWU and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

Our business is exposed to price volatility associated the procurement of SWU and uranium.

The Company is exposed to commodity price risk for purchases of SWU and uranium. Our earnings and cash flows are therefore exposed to variability of spot and forward market prices in the markets in which it operates. The supply markets for SWU and uranium are subject to price fluctuations and availability restrictions.

Operational Risks

Operational risks relate to risks arising from systems, processes, people and external events that affect the operation of our business, including supply chain and business disruption and data protection and security, including cyber security.


Restrictions on imports or sales of LEUSWU or SWUuranium that we buy from our Russian supplier and our other sources of supply could adversely affect profitability and the viability of our business.


The majority of the SWU and LEU that we use to fill existing contracts with customers is sourced from outside the United States, including from Russia under the TENEX Supply Agreement, and we expect the arrangement to continue into the future. Our ability to place this SWU and LEU we purchase into existing and future contracts with customers is subject to trade restrictions, sanctions, and other limitations imposed by the United States and other governments and our customers. For example, our imports from Russia are subject to U.S. importquotas. Given the quotas, restrictions, and customer limitations that limit our ability to sell SWU and in some cases,LEU purchased under the terms of contracts with customers that preclude us from delivering SWU or LEU produced in specific countries. Further,TENEX Supply Agreement both in the case of Russian LEU,United States and globally, there is no guarantee that we can make sufficient sales of Russian LEUto meet our minimum purchase obligation under the TENEX Supply Agreement. (For further information refer to Part I, Item 1, Competition and Foreign Trade).

Further, currently evolving international events, including the war in Ukraine could result in new or SWU are more challenging than sales of non-Russianadditional sanctions or other U.S. or foreign government actions that could directly or indirectly limit or prevent our purchase, importation, or ability to sell material becauseunder our TENEX Supply Agreement. Even absent such restrictions, some of our U.S. and foreign customers are unable or unwilling to accept Russian LEU.SWU and uranium.


Imports of LEU under the Russian Supply Agreement are subject to quotas imposed under legislation enacted into law in September 2008 and under the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement, as amended in 2008 (the “RSA”). We are dependent upon TENEX to grant us the right to use a portion of these quotas under the terms of the Russian Supply Agreement in order to import Russian LEU for sale in the United States. The RSA is scheduled to expire at the end of 2020, and the Russian Supply Agreement does not include any provisions addressing what would happen if additional or other restrictions on imports of Russian LEU or SWU are imposed after 2020.

The RSA is subject to periodic review by the Department of Commerce (“DOC”). The DOC is currently conducting a review that is scheduled to be completed in June 2020. As result of the review, the DOC may find that the RSA has not been complied with or does not meet certain statutory requirements, which, in either case, could cause the DOC to terminate the RSA. If the RSA is terminated, duties or other restrictions could be applied to imports of LEU or other uranium products. These duties, at least initially, would exceed 115% of the value of the imported LEU.

Since 2019, the DOC, Rosatom and TENEX have been engaged in negotiations to extend the RSA. In connection with these negotiations, the DOC is seeking a significant extension of the RSA. We are working with industry stakeholders and others to ensure that the extension will include sufficient quota to allow all existing contracts with TENEX, including the Russian Supply Agreement, to be fully implemented, but it is possible that the terms of the extension will not expressly protect our ability to import LEU under the Russian Supply Agreement or require that available quota be allocated to those imports. Because the Russian Supply Agreement does not stipulate what would happen if quotas or other restrictions are imposed post-2020, there is no assurance that the Company will be permitted to use any future quotas to import LEU under the Russian Supply Agreement post-2020. Further, even if TENEX were willing to grant the Company the right to use all or a portion of the new quotas, there is no assurance that the new quotas would be sufficient to cover all the LEU that the Company is required to order under the Russian Supply Agreement after 2020. Finally, while the Company has asked that the DOC to provide sufficient quota for the Russian Supply Agreement, the DOC has yet to adopt that position. Further, even if sufficient quota is granted to TENEX for the Russian Supply Agreement, TENEX may elect not to use that quota for the Russian Supply Agreement.



It also is possible that, in lieu of agreeing to extend the RSA, the DOC or the Russian Federation may elect to allow the RSA to expire and for the antidumping investigation that was suspended by the RSA to restart. Under such circumstances, any imports of Russian LEU, including by the Company, would be required to be accompanied by a deposit of funds to cover potential duties owed to the U.S. government of over 115% of the value of the imported LEU, pending the outcome of the investigation. If the investigation resulted in an antidumping order imposing duties, the deposits would be kept by the U.S. government, up to the amount of duties owed for imports entering the United States during the restarted investigation, and duties would have to be paid to the U.S. government, on a going-forward basis, on all imports entering the United States after the order is imposed.

In addition to the potential for quotas, duty deposits or duties that might apply as results of an extended or terminated RSA, other duties, sanctions and other trade restrictions could be applied to LEU and other forms of foreign uranium as a result of trade actions by the United States. For example, sanctions on Rosatom, TENEX or other Rosatom subsidiaries and affiliates could be imposed through legislation or as a result of sanctions imposed by the U.S. government, and these sanctions would prevent or limit the ability of the Company to do business with these companies.

Regardless of the reason for which they are imposed, quotas, duties, sanctions or other trade restrictions would affect Centrus’ sales of non-U.S. natural uranium, SWU or LEU containing non-U.S. uranium or SWU, which would adversely affect Centrus’ revenues and financial results.

If we cannot purchase the LEU, SWU or uranium that we are committed to purchase from our foreign suppliers, including TENEX, or we cannot sell such LEU, SWU or uranium for consumption in the United States due to quotas, duties, sanctions or other trade restrictions, we will have to sell the LEU, SWU or uranium for consumption outside the United States. Our ability to sell outside the United States may be limited by policies of foreign governments or regional institutions that seek to restrict the origin of LEU, SWU or uranium purchased by utilities and other entities under their jurisdiction. In addition, foreign companies who take delivery of imported LEU, SWU or uranium from us in the United States may be unwilling to cooperate with us in meeting requirements under U.S. law that provide that the imported material be re-exported within a fixed period of time. Further, geopoliticalGeopolitical events, including domestic or international reactions or responses to such events, as well as concerns about U.S. national security or other issues, also could lead to U.S. or foreign government or international actions including the imposition of sanctions, that could disrupt our ability to purchase, sell, or make deliveries to customers of LEU, SWU, or other uranium products, from Russia or other countries, or even to continue to do business with one or more of our suppliers. Any of these quotas, duties, sanctions,suppliers or other trade restrictions could threaten our abilitytheir affiliates. Our inability to fulfillmeet our purchase commitmentsor sales obligations, or to earn revenues from U.S. and international sales, would adversely affect our suppliers and our delivery commitments to customers, with adverse effects on our reputation, costs,financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and long-term viability. Eventhe viability of our business. All of these outcomes, individually and collectively, could cause us to incur significant financial losses, in the absence of quotas, duties, sanctions,addition to impeding or other trade restrictions, customers may be unwilling to agree to purchasepreventing us from fulfilling our existing contracts, or amendwinning new contracts, to permit delivery of foreign LEU, SWU or uranium. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to sell or deliver, in or outside of the United States, the LEU, SWU or uranium we are obligated to purchase under the Russian Supply Agreement, the Orano Supply Agreement and other supply agreements. Inability to purchase, sell or deliver LEU, SWU or uranium for any reason, could adversely impactaffect our business, profitability and long-term viability.the viability of our business.

21



We may be unable to sell all of the LEU we are required to purchase under supply agreements for prices that cover our costs, which could adversely affect profitability and the viability of our business.


We may not achieve the anticipated benefits from supply agreements we enter into. For example, the priceThe prices we are charged for the SWU component under some of our supply agreements isare determined by a formulaformulas that uses a combination of market-related price points and other factors at the time of delivery, which may result in prices that are not be aligned with the prevailing market prices at the time we enter into contracts with customers. Other existing or new supply agreements may have pricing mechanisms that may not be aligned with market prices. The pricing mechanisms of our supply agreements may not align with pricing providedAs a result, the sales prices in our new or existing sales contracts and could result in sales prices that domay not cover our purchase costs, andor those purchase costs may limit our ability to make new sales at prices that exceed the purchase price we pay for the LEU.secure profitable sales.




We are dependent on existing inventorypurchases from our suppliers and other sources to meet our obligations to customers.customers and rely on third parties to provide essential services.


We are currently dependent on existing inventory, purchases from TENEX, Orano and other sourcessuppliers to meet our obligations to customers. We are acquiring alternative sources of supply incustomers, including purchases from the market. The availability, cost and terms of additional alternative sources of supply are subject to variables that are difficult to predict.Russian government entity, TENEX. A significant delay in, or stoppage or termination of, deliveries of material to us under our supply agreements, could adversely affect our ability to make deliveries to customerscustomers. The recent action of Russian military forces in Ukraine has escalated tensions between Russia and wouldthe U.S. The U.S. has imposed, and is likely to impose additional, financial and economic sanctions and export controls against certain Russian organizations and/or individuals. Sanctions and export controls, as well as any actions by Russia, could adversely affect revenuesour supply and results of operations. A delay, stoppage or termination could occur due to a number of factors, including logistical problems with shipments, commercial or political disputes between the parties or their governments, imposition of quotas, duties, sanctions, or other restrictions or a failure or inability by either partyour ability to meet the terms of such agreements. An interruption of deliveries could adversely impact our business, results of operations, and prospects.obligations to customers.


We face risks associated with reliance on third-party suppliers to meet customer commitments.

Wealso rely on third-party suppliersthird parties to provide essential services to the Company, such as the storage and management of inventory, transportation, and radiation protection. We face the risk that thoseThose service providers may not perform on time, with the desired quality, or at all for a variety of reasons, many of which are outside our control. Alternative third-partyAn interruption of deliveries from our suppliers or the provision of essential services by third parties, could adversely impact our business, results of operations, and prospects.

We face significant competition from major producers who may not be readily availableless cost sensitive or may be more costly. As a resultfavored due to support from foreign governments.

We compete with major producers of such risks,LEU, all of which are wholly or substantially owned by governments: Orano (France), Rosatom/TENEX (Russia), Urenco (the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and two German utilities), and CNEIC (China). Our competitors have greater financial resources than we do. Foreign competitors enjoy financial and other support from their government owners, which may enable them to be less cost or profit-sensitive than we are. In addition, decisions by foreign competitors may be unableinfluenced by political and economic policy considerations rather than commercial considerations. For example, foreign competitors may elect to meetincrease their production or exports of LEU, SWU, or other uranium products, including HALEU, even when not justified by market conditions, thereby depressing prices and reducing demand for our customer commitments, our costs could be higher than planned, and/or our relationship with customers could be negatively affected, all of whichLEU, SWU, and other uranium products. This could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects. Customers place great valueMoreover, our competitors may be better positioned to take advantage of improved market conditions and increase capacity to meet any future market expansion.

The ability to compete in certain foreign markets may be limited for legal, political, economic or other reasons.

Doing business in foreign markets poses additional risks and challenges. For example, agreements for cooperation between the reliabilityU.S. government and various foreign governments or governmental agencies control the export of theirnuclear materials from the United States. We are unable to supply of fuel for their reactors. Failureforeign reactors unless there is an agreement for cooperation in force. If an agreement with a country in which one or more of our customers is located were to make a deliverylapse, terminate, or be amended, our sales or deliveries could have an adverse effect on our ability to make new sales and could have an adverse effect onbe curtailed or terminated, adversely affecting our business, results of operations, and prospects. Moreover, the lack of such agreements for cooperation between the United States government and those governments or agencies in emerging markets may restrict our ability to sell into such markets. Additionally, countries may impose other restrictions on the import or export of material or services.


Periodically, events or issues arise
22


Purchases of LEU and SWU by customers in the European Union are subject to a policy of the Euratom Supply Agency that may affect the performanceseeks to limit foreign enriched uranium to no more than 20% of European Union consumption per year. Similarly, China has a policy of using Chinese sources of LEU and SWU. Such policies limit our suppliers. There can be no assuranceability to sell in those countries.

Certain foreign markets lack a comprehensive nuclear liability law that the steps we may take to address these events or issues will be successful in minimizing potential impactsprotects suppliers by channeling liability for injury and property damage suffered by third persons from nuclear incidents at a nuclear facility to the Company and our customers. Unless adequately addressed, such events or issuesfacility’s operator. The lack of legal protection for suppliers could adversely affect our business, results of operations,ability to compete for sales to meet the growing demand for LEU or SWU in these markets and prospects.our prospects for future revenue from such sales.


Dependence on our largest customers could adversely affect us.


In 2019,2021, our ten largest nuclear fuel customerscustomers represented approximately 72%57% of total revenue and our threetwo largest customers represented approximately 56%24% of total revenue. Further, individual orders average roughly $10$7.4 million. A reduction in purchases from our customers, whether due to their decision not to purchase optional quantities or for other reasons, including a disruption or change in their operations or financial condition that reduces purchases of LEU, SWU, or other uranium products from us, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

We have seen increased price competition when competitors and secondary suppliers lowered their prices to sell excess supply created by prevailing market conditions. This has adversely affected our sales efforts. Because price is a significant factor in a customer’s choice of a LEU supplier, when contracts come up for renewal, customers may reduce their purchases from us if we are not able to compete on price or for other reasons, resulting in the loss of new sales contracts. Once lost, customers may be difficult to regain because they typically purchase LEU under long-term contracts. Therefore, given the need to maintain existing customer relationships, our ability to raise prices to respond to increasesConsequently, we may face reduced revenues and difficulty in costs or other developments may be limited. In addition, because we have a commitment to acquire LEU from third parties, any reduction in purchases by the customers below the level required for us to resellselling the material we are obligated to buy, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations,operations, and prospects.




The dollar amount of the sales order book, as stated at any given time, is not necessarily indicative of future sales revenues and is subject to uncertainty.


Our order book of sales is the estimated aggregate dollar amount of SWU and uranium sales that we expect to recognize as revenue in future periods under existing contracts with customers. It includes deferred revenue for sales in which we have been paid but still have a delivery obligation, which means we will not receive cash in the future from those deliveries. There is no assurance that the revenues projected will be realized, or, if realized, will result in profits. Most of our contracts provide for fixed purchases of SWU during a given year. Our estimate of the order book is partially based on a number of factors including customers’ estimates of the timing and size of their fuel requirements and other assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. The order book is also based on estimates of future selling prices, which are subject to change.prices. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, prices may be adjusted based on escalation using a general inflation index, published SWU or uranium market price indicators prevailing at the time of delivery, and other factors, all of which are unpredictable, particularly in light of general uncertainty in the nuclear market. We use external composite forecasts of future market prices and inflation rates in our pricing estimates. These forecasts may not be accurate, and therefore estimates of future prices could be over or understated.unpredictable. Any inaccuracy in estimates of future prices would add to the imprecision of the order book estimate.

For a variety of reasons, the amounts of SWU and uranium that we will sell in the future under existing contracts, and the timing of customer purchases under those contracts, may differ from estimates. Customers may not purchase as much as we predict, nor at the times we anticipate, as a result of operational or financial difficulties, changes in fuel requirements, reactor shutdowns, natural or other disasters, changes in law or other reasons. Reduced purchases would reduce the revenues we actually receive from contracts included in the order book. Customers could also seek to modify or cancel orders in response to concerns regarding our financial strength or future business prospects. Further, financial and operational issues, including possibility for bankruptcies, facing our customers could affect the order book.

The order book includes a number of contracts with sales prices that are significantly above current market prices. Customers may seek to limit their obligations under these existing contracts or may be unwilling to continue those contracts. Further, some of our customers are facing financial difficulties and may seek modifications to their contracts or seek bankruptcy protection.

From time to time, we have worked with customers to modify contracts that have delivery, scheduling, origin or other terms that may require modifications to address our anticipated supply sources. If we were to initiate such discussions in the future, we have no assurance that our customers would agree to revise existing contracts or would not require concessions, which could adversely affect the value of our order book and our prospects.


Our ability to operate the HALEU enrichment facility we are deploying under the HALEU Contract after the completion of the deployment is dependent on our ability to secure additional contracts and funding from the U.S. government or other sources.

In 2019, Centrus began work on a three-year, cost-shared contract with the DOE to deploy a cascade of 16 of our AC100M centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU with domestic technology. As a result of the on-going supply chain disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other factors, DOE has been unable to provide the cylinders required to begin HALEU production under the current contract. Consequently, operation of the demonstration cascade will be performed pursuant to a separate subsequent, competitively-awarded contract which may not be awarded to us. Although we believe we are well positioned to compete for the subsequent contract to operate the cascade beginning in 2022, there is no assurance that we will be awarded such contract.

Our goal is to be in a position to begin production and scale up the facility in modular fashion as demand for HALEU grows in the commercial and/or government sectors. However, our right to operate the facility we are building depends on the award of one or more follow-on contracts by the U.S. government, as well as continued
23


funding for operation from the U.S. government or other sources. There is no assurance that we will be awarded such contracts or that such funding will be available. Further, it is uncertain whether or when demand to support the scale up of the facility will materialize. If we do not secure the necessary contracts and funding and if sufficient demand does not emerge, we may not be able to continue or expand operations at that facility and may not be able to support providing HALEU fuel for the advanced reactors under development.

If we are required to delease the facility where we are deploying the HALEU cascade under the HALEU Contract and return it, along with the centrifuges and supporting equipment, to the DOE at the expirations of our contract, this would likely result in the termination of our NRC operating license and us laying off our Piketon workforce. However, if we are able to continue operating the facility, we would incur additional costs and liabilities associated with the facility.

If the Company’s operation of the Piketon facility were terminated, there can be no assurance that we could regain use of the Piketon facility or obtain a new NRC license in the future at the Piketon site or an alternative site, in which event we would be unable to begin commercial production of HALEU. We may also incur additional costs related to reducing our workforce or closing the Piketon facility. Failure to secure U.S. government or other funding to support the continued operation of the Piketon facility, and retain our NRC license, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition along with our plans for future growth.

Our technical solutions segment conducts business under various types of contracts, including fixed-price and cost-share contracts, which subjects us to risks associated with cost over-runs.


The technical solutions segment conducts business under various types of contracts, including fixed-price contracts and cost-share contracts, where costs must be estimated in advance of our performance. These types of contracts are priced, in part, on cost and scheduling estimates that are based on assumptions including prices and availability of experienced labor, equipment and materials. If, for example, thesematerials, and estimates prove inaccurate, if there are errors or ambiguities asof the amount of other contract work we expect to contract specifications or if circumstances change due to, among other things, unanticipated technical problems, poor project execution, changes inperform. In the costs of equipment and materials or our suppliers’ or subcontractors’ inability to perform, thenevent we have cost overruns, may occur. Wewe may not be able to obtain compensation for additional work performed or expenses incurred. For example, the Company entered in a cost share agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) for the licensing, construction, assembly and operation of our AC100M centrifuge machines and related infrastructure in a cascade formation to produce high assay low enriched uranium (“HALEU”). Under the Agreement, DOE will reimburse us for up to 80% of the total program costs up to a maximum amount of $115 million. Any costs incurred above these amounts would increase the Company’s cost share. Our failure to accurately estimate the resources and time required for fixed-price or cost-share contracts or our failure to complete our contractual obligations within the time frame and costs committed could result in reduced profits, greater costs, or a loss for that contract. If the cost overrun on a contract is


significant, or we encounter issues that affect multiple contracts, the cost overrun could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our ability to expand our technical solutions segment is dependent on developing new business opportunities, meeting the requirements of new customers and timely performance of work in different market sectors.

Our technical solutions segment is focusing on new customers and new industries with which we do not currently do business as part of our business development efforts. As we develop these opportunities, we may face greater costs and we may need to devote more resources to obtain contract work. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify new business opportunities, accurately estimate the time, cost and complexity of the work, achieve market acceptance of our services or that services provided by others will not render our services obsolete or noncompetitive or we will be able to timely complete the work or avoid cost overruns.

The U.S. government awards contracts through a rigorous competitive process and our efforts to obtain future federal contracts may not be successful.

The U.S. government conducts a rigorous competitive bidding and award process for most federal contracts. We face strong competition and pricing pressures for any additional contract awards from the U.S. government, and we may be required to qualify or continue to qualify under the various multiple award task order contract criteria. It may be difficult for us to win future awards from the U.S. government and we may have other contractors sharing in any U.S. government awards that we win. In addition, negative publicity regarding findings stemming from audits, congressional opposition, and litigation may adversely affect our ability to obtain future awards.

Our U.S. government contract work is regularly reviewed and audited by the U.S. government and these reviews can lead to withholding or delay of payments to us, non-receipt of award fees, legal actions, fines, penalties and liabilities and other remedies against us.

U.S. government contracts are subject to specific regulations such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), the Truth in Negotiations Act, Cost Accounting Standards rules and regulations (“CAS”), the Service Contract Act and DOE regulations. Failure to comply with any of these regulations, requirements or statutes may result in contract price adjustments, financial penalties or contract termination. Our U.S. government contracts are subject to audits, cost reviews and investigations by U.S. government contracting oversight agencies such as the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA"). The DCAA reviews the adequacy of, and our compliance with, our internal control systems and policies, including our labor, billing, accounting, purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. The DCAA has the authority to conduct audits and reviews to determine if we are complying with the requirements under the FAR and CAS, pertaining to the allocation, period assignment and allowability of costs assigned to U.S. government contracts. The DCAA presents its report findings to the contracting agency. Should the contracting agency determine that we have not complied with the terms of our contract and applicable statutes and regulations, payments to us may be disallowed, which could result in adjustments to previously reported revenues and refunding of previously collected cash proceeds. Additionally, we may be subject to litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the U.S. government under the Federal False Claims Act, which could include claims for treble damages. If we experience performance issues under any of our U.S. government contracts, the U.S. government retains the right to pursue remedies, which could include termination under any affected contract. If any contract were so terminated, our ability to secure future contracts could be adversely affected and may also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



Our U.S. government contracts and subcontracts are dependent on continued U.S. government funding and government appropriations, which may not be made on a timely basis or at all, and could have an adverse effect on our business.

Current and future U.S. government contracts and subcontracts are dependent on government funding, which is generally subject to Congressional appropriations. Our ability to perform under these federal contracts and subcontracts is dependent upon sufficient funding for, and timely payment by, the entities with which we have contracted. There could be reductions or terminations of, or delays in, the required funding. If the contracting governmental agency, or the prime contractor, does not receive sufficient appropriations to cover its contractual obligations, it may terminate our contract or delay or reduce payment to us. Any inability to award a contractor subcontract, delay in payment, or the termination of a contract due to a lapse in funding, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations or cash flow.

Failures to protect classified or other sensitive information or security breaches of information technology (“IT”) systems could result in significant liability or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.

Our business requires us to use and protect classified, sensitive and other protected information as well as business proprietary information and intellectual property. Our computer networks and other information technology (“IT”) systems are designed to protect this information through the use of classified networks and other procedures. We routinely experience various cybersecurity threats, threats to our information technology infrastructure, unauthorized attempts to gain access to our Company sensitive information, and denial-of-service attacks as do our customers, suppliers, subcontractors and other business partners. The threats we face vary from attacks common to most industries to more advanced and persistent, highly organized adversaries, including nation states, which target us and other government contractors because we protect national security information. If we are unable to protect sensitive information, our customers or governmental authorities could question the adequacy of our threat mitigation and detection processes and procedures, and depending on the severity of the incident, our Company data, customers’ data, our employees’ data, our intellectual property, and other third party data could be compromised. As a consequence of the persistence, sophistication and volume of these attacks, we may not be successful in defending against all such attacks. Due to the evolving nature of these security threats and the national security aspects of much of the data we protect, the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted.

We have a number of suppliers and indirect suppliers with a wide variety of systems and cybersecurity capabilities and we may not be successful in preventing adversaries from exploiting possible weak links in our supply chain. We also must rely on this supply chain for detecting and reporting cyber incidents, which could affect our ability to report or respond to cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means.

A material network breach in the security of the IT systems of the Company or third parties for any reasons, including, but not limited to, human error, could include the theft of our business proprietary and intellectual property. To the extent any security breach or human error results in a loss or damage to data, or in inappropriate disclosure of classified or other protected information, the breach could cause grave damage to the country’s national security and to our business. Threats to our IT systems are constantly evolving and there is no assurance that our efforts to maintain and improve our IT systems will be sufficient to meet current or future threats. One of the biggest threats to the information we protect comes from the insider threat — an employee with legitimate access who engages in misconduct and/or negligence. Transitions in the business, in particular the potential for employee layoffs and other transitions, can increase the risk that an insider with access could steal Company intellectual property. Any event leading to a security breach or loss of, or damage to, data, whether by our employees or third parties, could result in negative publicity, significant remediation costs, legal liability, and damage to our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In an extreme case, DOE could terminate our permit to access classified information resulting in elimination of our ability to continue American Centrifuge work.




Financial Risks

Financial risks relate to our financial condition, capital structure and ability to meet financial obligations and the price, volatility and ownership concentration of our Class A Common Stock.


We have significant long-term liabilities.


We continue to have significant long-term liabilities, including the indebtedness under our 8.25% Notes, which mature in February 2027. We also still have substantial pension and postretirement health and life benefit obligations and other long-term liabilities. In addition, the terms of the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes will not restrict Centrus or any of its subsidiaries from incurring substantial additional indebtedness in the future.


Our significant long-term liabilities (and other third-party financial obligations) could have important consequences, including:

the terms and conditions imposed by the documents governing our indebtedness could makemaking it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to lenders and other creditors, resulting in possible defaults on, and acceleration of, such indebtedness or breaches of such other commitments;
we may be more vulnerable to adverse economic conditions and have less flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in the nuclear industry, which could placeplacing us at a competitive disadvantage comparedby making us more vulnerable to industry competitors that have less debtreact to adverse economic conditions or comparable debt at more favorable interest rates and that, as a result, may be better positioned to withstand economic downturns;changes in the nuclear industry;
we may find it more difficulthindering our ability to obtain additional financing for future working capital and other general corporate requirements;
we will be required to dedicate a substantial portion ofreducing our cash resources tofor payments on theour 8.25% Notes due in February 2027, thereby reducing the availability oflimiting our cashability to fund our operations, capital expenditures, and future business opportunities; and,
the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes, subject to certain exceptions, places
24


placing certain restrictions on the ability of our subsidiary, United States Enrichment Corporation (“Enrichment Corp.”), to transfer cash and other assets to us, which could constrain our ability to pay dividends on our Common Stock or to fund our commitments or the commitments of our other subsidiaries.subsidiaries, pursuant to the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes, subject to certain exceptions; and

restricting our ability to engage in certain mergers or acquisitions pursuant to the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes also requires us to offer to repurchase all such outstanding notes at 101% of their outstanding principal amount in the event of certain change of control events.

The terms of the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes do not restrict Centrus or any of its subsidiaries from incurring substantial additional indebtedness in the future. If we incur substantial additional indebtedness the foregoing risks would intensify.intensify, however. Additional information concerning the 8.25% Notes including the terms and conditions of the 8.25% Notes are described in Note 9,8, Debt of the consolidated financial statements.


The Company has material unfunded defined benefit pension plans obligations and postretirement health and life benefit obligations. TheseLevels of returns on pension and postretirement benefit plan assets, changes in interest rates and other factors affecting the amounts to be contributed to fund future pension and postretirement benefit liabilities are anticipated to require material contributionscould adversely affect earnings and cash flows in future periods, which may divert funds from other uses and could adversely impact the Company’s liquidity and prospects.periods.


Centrus and its subsidiary, Enrichment Corp., maintain qualified defined benefit pension plans that are guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), a wholly ownedwholly-owned U.S. government corporation that was created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). Centrus also maintains non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for certain executive officers. Effective August 2013, accrued benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are fixed and no longer increase to reflect changes in compensation or Company service. In addition, Enrichment Corp. maintains postretirement health and life benefit plans. The aforementioned pension and health and life benefit plans are closed to new participants. These plans are anticipated to require material cash contributions in the future, which may divert funds from other uses and could adversely impact our liquidity depending on the timing of any required contributions or payments in relation to our sources of cash and other payment obligations. See also the Risk Factor, Levels of returns on pension and postretirement



benefit plan assets, changes in interest rates and other factors affecting the amounts to be contributed to fund future pension and postretirement benefit liabilities could adversely affectFurther, earnings and cash flows in future periods, below.

Levels of returns on pension and postretirement benefit plan assets, changes in interest rates and other factors affecting the amounts to be contributed to fund future pension and postretirement benefit liabilities could adversely affect earnings and cash flows in future periods.

Earnings may be positively or negatively impacted by the amount of expense we record for employee benefit plans. This is particularly true with expense for the pension and postretirement benefit plans. Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) require a company to calculate expenseexpenses for these plans using actuarial valuations. These valuations are based on assumptions relating to financial markets and other economic conditions. Changes in key economic indicators can result in changes in the assumptions used. The key year-end assumptions used to estimate pension and postretirement benefit expenses for the following year are the discount rate, the expected rate of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. The rate of return on pension assets and changes in interest rates affect funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans. The IRS and the Pension Protection Act of 2006 regulate the minimum amount we contribute to our pension plans. The amount we are required to contribute to pension plans cancould have an adverse effect on our cash flows.


Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows.


Revenue is recognized when or as we transfer control of the promised LEU or uranium to the customer. Customer demand is affected by, among other things, electricity markets, reactor operations, maintenance, and the timing of refueling outages. Customer payments for the SWU component of LEU typically average roughly $10 million per order. Further, some customers are facing challenging market and financial conditions, including seeking protection under bankruptcy laws. Accordingly, they may seek modification of or relief from their obligations either informally or under bankruptcy laws. As a result, a relatively small change in the timing, amount, or other terms of customer orders for LEU due to a change in a customer’s refueling schedule or other reasons may cause operating results to be substantially above or below expectations, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows.


Results of operations could be negatively impacted if adverse conditions or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment loss related to our intangible assets.assets.


Intangible assets originated from our reorganization and application of fresh start accounting as of September 30, 2014. The intangible assets represented the fair value adjustment to the assets and liabilities for our LEU segment. The intangible assets remaining on our balance sheet relate to our sales order book and customer relationships. The order book intangible asset is amortized to expense as the order book valued at emergence is reduced, principally as a result of deliveries to customers. The customer relationships intangible asset is amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the estimated average useful life of 15 years.years with 7 ¾ years of scheduled amortization remaining.


25


The carrying values of the intangible assets are subject to impairment tests whenever adverse conditions or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment loss. If impairment is indicated, the asset carrying value will be reduced to its fair value. Inherent in our fair value determinations are certain judgments and estimates, including projections of future cash flows, the discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and strategic plans with regard to operations. A change in these underlying assumptions would cause a change in the results of the tests, which could cause the fair value of the intangible asset to be less than its respective carrying amount.




Centrus is dependent on intercompany support from Enrichment Corp.


Substantially all of our revenue-generating operations are conducted at our subsidiary, Enrichment Corp. The financing obtained from Enrichment Corp. funds our general corporate expenses, including interest payments on the 8.25% Notes, which are guaranteed on a limited and subordinated basis by Enrichment Corp. As a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Centrus, Enrichment Corp. has its own set of creditors and a separate board of directors (the “Enrichment Board”), who are elected by Centrus. Current and future funding and support are conditional and dependent on Enrichment Corp.’s own financial condition and a determination by the Enrichment Board that such funding is in the interest of Enrichment Corp.


There is a limited trading marketvolume for our securities and the market price of our securities is subject to volatility.


The price of our Class A Common Stock remains subject to volatility. The market price and level of trading of our Class A Common Stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among other things, our limited trading history, our limited trading volume, the concentration of holdings of our Class A Common Stock, actual or anticipated variations in our operating results and cash flow, the nature and content of our earnings releases, announcements or events that impact our products, customers, competitors or markets, business conditions in our markets and the general state of the securities markets and the market for energy-related stocks, as well as general economic and market conditions and other factors that may affect our future results. Additionally, future sales of our common stock or instruments convertible into our common stock, in public or private offerings may depress our stock price.


OneHolders of our Class B stockholders has sold shares of Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share (“Class B Common Stock to a third-party, which resulted inStock” and together with the automatic conversion of the sold shares into Class A Common Stock. Our Class B stockholdersStock, “Common Stock”) may make decisions regarding their investment in the Company based upon factors that are unrelated to the Company’s performance. Any further sales of shares by such stockholder or a decision by the otherholders of our Class B stockholder to sell sharesCommon Stock would also result in automatic conversion (with limited exceptions) of Class B Common Stock into Class A Common Stock, upon the sale of Class B Common Stock, which in turn could significantly adversely impact the trading price of the Class A Common Stock.


Our 8.25% Notes and the Series B Preferred Stock are not listed on any securities exchange. No assurance can be given as to the liquidity of the trading market for the 8.25% Notes or the Series B Preferred Stock.Notes. The 8.25% Notes and the Series B Preferred Stock may only be traded only infrequently in transactions arranged through brokers or otherwise, and reliable market quotations for the 8.25% Notes and the Series B Preferred Stock may not be available. In addition, the trading prices of the 8.25% Notes and the Series B Preferred Stock will depend on many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the limited trading volumes, and the other factors discussed above with respect to the Class A Common Stock.


A small number of holders of our Class A stockholdersCommon Stock may exert significant influence over the direction of the Company.


As of December 31, 2019,2021, based solely on amounts reported in Schedule 13D and 13G filings with the SEC, two principal stockholders (those stockholders with beneficial ownership of more than 10%the largest holdings of our Class A Common Stock)Stock collectively beneficially own approximately 30%19% of our Class A Common Stock. As a result, these stockholders may be able to exert significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a merger of the Company, or sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets. These stockholders may have interests that differ from, and may vote in a way adverse to, other holders of Class A Common Stock, or adverse to the recommendations of the Company’s management. This concentration of ownership may make it more difficult for other stockholders to effect substantial changes in the Company, may limit the ability of the Company to pass
26


certain initiatives or other items that require stockholder approval, and may also have the effect of delaying, preventing, or expediting, as the case may be, a change in control of the Company.




A small number of Class A stockholders, who also have significant holdings of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and 8.25% Notes, may be motivated by interests that are not aligned with the Company’s other Class A stockholders.


Currently, a small number of persons who also are stockholders collectively own greater than 50% of our Series B Preferred Stock and 25% of our 8.25% Notes. As a result, these stockholders may have interests that differ from the remainder of the holders of our Class A stockholders,Common Stock, and, as a result, may vote or take other actions in a way adverse to other holders of Class A Common Stock.

Our outstanding Series B Preferred Shares rank senior to Common Stock with respect to amounts payable in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up and we may not pay dividends on our Common Stock while Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding. 

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding Series B Preferred Shares with an aggregate liquidation preference of $127.2 million, including accrued but unpaid dividends of $22.3 million. Accrued preferred dividends must be paid upon certain conditions such as the achievement of certain financial thresholds, which could limit our flexibility to use cash for other purposes if those thresholds are met. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up and there are amounts available for distribution to equity holders after satisfaction of our existing indebtedness and other liabilities, we would be required to make distributions in the amount of the aggregate liquidation preference, including accrued but unpaid dividends at that time, to the holders of the Series B Preferred Shares prior to making any distributions to holders of our Common Stock, which may mean there are insufficient amounts remaining to make a distribution to holders of our Common Stock. The terms of our Series B Preferred Shares also provide that we may not pay dividends on our Common Stock (other than dividends payable in Common Stock) so long as any shares of our Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding. In addition, our Series B Preferred Shares accrue preferred dividends at a rate of 7.5% per annum of the liquidation amount at origination, or $104.6 million, and we do not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future. As a result, the amount of dividends and distributions in a liquidation event, which are senior to the Common Stock, will continue to increase and could adversely affect the value of our Common Stock as long as the Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding. Redemption of our Series B Preferred Shares pursuant to their terms would require us to pay the aggregate liquidation preference including all accrued but unpaid dividends. If we were to otherwise seek to repurchase or retire the Series B Preferred Shares, we may not be able to do so on favorable terms or at all and we could be required to use existing cash, issue additional debt, preferred shares and/or another class of common stock, which may also be senior to our Class A and Class B Common Stock, place additional restrictions on our use of cash or our operations or otherwise dilute the interests of the holders of our Common Stock.

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be limited.


Our ability to fully utilize our existing net operating losses (“NOLs”) or net unrealized built-in losses could be limited or eliminated in the event (i) we undergo an “ownership change” as described under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) we do not reach profitability or are only marginally profitable, or (iii) there are changes in U.S. government laws and regulations. An “ownership change” is generally defined as a greater than 50% change in equity ownership by value over a rolling three-year period. Past or future ownership changes, some of which may be beyond our control, as well as differences and fluctuations in the value of our equity securities may adversely affect our ability to utilize our NOLs and could reduce our flexibility to raise capital in future equity financings or other transactions, or we may determinedecide to pursue transactions even if they would result in an ownership change and impair our ability to use our NOLs. In addition, the Section“Section 382 Rights AgreementAgreement” we have adopted with respect to our common stock and the transfer restrictions in the Series B Preferred Stock containcontains limitations on transferability intended to prevent the possibility of experiencing an “ownership change,” but we cannot assure yoube certain that these measures will be effective or weeffective. We also may determinedecide to pursue transactions even if they would result in an ownership change and impair our ability to use our NOLs. In addition, any changes to tax rules and regulations or the interpretation of tax rules and regulations (including recent tax legislation) could negatively impact our ability to recognize any potential benefits from our NOLs or net unrealized built-in losses.



Strategic Risks

Strategic risks relate to the Company’s future business plans and strategies, including the risks associated with: the global macro environment in which we operate, the demand for our products and services, competitive threats and technology innovation.

Our future prospects are tied directly to the nuclear energy industry worldwide, and the financial difficulties experienced by, and operating conditions of our customers could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Potential events that could affect either nuclear reactors under current or future contracts with us or the nuclear industry as a whole, include:

natural or other disasters (such as the 2011 Fukushima disaster) impacting nuclear facilities or involving shipments of nuclear materials;
regulatory actions or changes in regulations by nuclear regulatory bodies applicable to us, our suppliers or our customers;
decisions by agencies, courts or other bodies under applicable trade and other laws applicable to us, our suppliers or our customers;
disruptions in other areas of the nuclear fuel cycle, such as uranium supplies or conversion;
civic opposition to, or changes in government policies regarding, nuclear operations;
business decisions concerning reactors or reactor operations;
the financial condition of reactor owners and operations;
the need for generating capacity; or
consolidation within the electric power industry.

These events could adversely affect us to the extent they result in a reduction or elimination of customers’ contractual requirements to purchase from us, the suspension or reduction of nuclear reactor operations, the reduction of supplies of raw materials, lower demand, burdensome regulation, disruptions of shipments or production, increased competition from third parties, increased costs or difficulties or increased liability for actual or threatened property damage or personal injury.

Additionally, customers may face financial difficulties, including from factors unrelated to the nuclear industry, that could affect their willingness or ability to make purchases. We are exposed to the risk of loss in the event of nonperformance or a default by customers on their contracts. We cannot provide any assurance that our customers will not default on their obligations to us or file for bankruptcy protection. If a customer files for bankruptcy protection, we likely would be unable to collect all, or even a significant portion, of amounts that are owed to us. A customer default and bankruptcy filing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The continued excess supply of LEU in the market could adversely affect market prices and our business results.

Approximately 60 reactors in Japan and Germany were taken offline following the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami that caused irreparable damage to four reactors in Fukushima, Japan. Since that time, many reactors worldwide have closed, or are scheduled to close, years ahead of the end of their projected operating lifespan. Events related to Fukushima created an over-supply of nuclear fuel that continues to heavily influence market prices. In addition, U.S. reactor operators face aggressive price competition from natural gas and subsidized renewable generation like wind and solar. As a result, since 2013, United States utilities have closed or have announced plans to close 19 reactors with additional reactors at risk for early closure. In 2018, market prices for uranium enrichment hit an all-time low, but as of December 31, 2019, have recovered by 38%. Market uncertainty, including the possibility of additional future quotas, duties, sanctions or other trade restrictions on imported Russian


LEU or Russian suppliers of LEU, and reduced demand has adversely affected our ability to sell LEU. See also the Risk Factor, Restrictions on imports or sales of LEU or SWU that we buy could adversely affect profitability and the viability of our business above.

We have long been a leading supplier of LEU to Japanese and U.S. utilities. To maintain our order book with Japanese and U.S. utilities with reduced demand for fuel, we have restructured some contracts to give customers greater flexibility to meet their obligations without a material loss in value to Centrus. If deliveries under contracts included in our order book are significantly delayed, modified or canceled because customers enter bankruptcy or seek to limit their obligations, our revenues and cash flows may be adversely impacted, with a corresponding impact on our financial condition. In addition, China has emerged as a significant enriched uranium producer. Although primarily focused on supplying domestic requirements in China, Chinese government-owned enrichment plants also supply LEU to international markets, which may further contribute to the excess supply of LEU.

The ability to attract and retain key personnel is critical to the success of our business.

The success of our business depends on key executives, managers, scientists, engineers and other skilled personnel. The ability to attract and retain these key personnel may be difficult in light of the uncertainties currently facing the business and changes we may make to the organizational structure to adjust to changing circumstances. Changes in senior management could create uncertainty among our employees, customers and other third parties with which we do business. The inability to retain appropriately qualified and experienced senior executives could negatively affect our operations, strategic planning and performance.

The potential for DOE to seek to terminate or exercise its remedies under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement and our other agreements with DOE, or to require modifications to such agreements that are adverse to our interests, may have adverse consequences on the Company.

The Company and DOE signed an agreement dated June 17, 2002, as amended (the “2002 DOE-USEC Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties made long-term commitments directed at resolving issues related to the stability and security of the domestic uranium enrichment industry. The 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement requires the Company to develop, demonstrate and deploy advanced enrichment technology in accordance with milestones and provides for remedies in the event of a failure to meet a milestone under certain circumstances.

DOE has specific remedies under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement if we fail to meet a milestone that would adversely impact our ability to begin commercial operations of the American Centrifuge Plant on schedule, and such delay was within our control or was due to our fault or negligence or if we abandon or constructively abandon the commercial deployment of an advanced enrichment technology. These remedies include terminating the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement, revoking our access to DOE’s centrifuge technology that is required for the success of the American Centrifuge project, requiring us to transfer certain rights in the American Centrifuge technology and facilities to DOE, and requiring us to reimburse DOE for certain costs associated with the American Centrifuge project.

We also granted to DOE an irrevocable, non-exclusive right to use or permit third parties on behalf of DOE to use all centrifuge technology intellectual property (“Centrifuge IP”) royalty free for U.S. government purposes (which includes national defense purposes, including providing nuclear material to operate commercial nuclear power reactors for tritium production). We also granted an irrevocable, non-exclusive license to DOE to use such Centrifuge IP developed at our expense for commercial purposes (including a right to sublicense), which may be exercised only if we miss any of the milestones under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement or if we (or our affiliate or entity acting through us) are no longer willing or able to proceed with, or have determined to abandon or have constructively abandoned, the commercial deployment of the centrifuge technology. Such a commercial purposes license is subject to payment of an agreed upon royalty to us, which will not exceed $665 million in the aggregate. While our long-term objective is to commercially deploy the American Centrifuge technology when it is commercially feasible to do so, DOE may take the position that we are no longer willing or able to proceed with commercial deployment or have actually or constructively abandoned commercially deployment. On that basis, the


DOE might invoke its rights under the commercial purposes license described above. Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our business and prospects.

DOE may seek to exercise remedies under this agreement and there is no assurance that the parties will be able to reach agreement on appropriate modifications to the agreements in the future. Moreover, even if the parties reach agreement on modifications to such agreements, there is no assurance that such modifications will not impose material additional requirements, provide DOE with material additional rights or remedies or otherwise affect the overall economics of the American Centrifuge technology and the ability to finance and successfully deploy the technology. Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our business and prospects.

We face significant competition from four major producers who may be less cost sensitive or may be favored due to national loyalties.

We compete with four major producers of LEU, all of which are wholly or substantially owned by governments: Orano (France), Rosatom/TENEX (Russia), Urenco (the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and two German utilities), and CNEIC (China). Our competitors have greater financial resources than we do. Foreign competitors enjoy financial and other support from their government owners, which may enable them to be less cost- or profit-sensitive than we are. In addition, decisions by foreign competitors may be influenced by political and economic policy considerations rather than commercial considerations. For example, foreign competitors may elect to increase their production or exports of LEU, even when not justified by market conditions, thereby depressing prices and reducing demand for LEU, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects. Similarly, the elimination or weakening of existing restrictions on imports from foreign competitors could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects. Moreover, our competitors may be better positioned to take advantage of improved market conditions and increase capacity to meet any future market expansion.

The ability to compete in certain foreign markets may be limited for political, legal and economic reasons.

Agreements for cooperation between the United States government and various foreign governments or governmental agencies control the export of nuclear materials from the United States. If any of the agreements governing exports to countries in which customers are located were to lapse, terminate or be amended, it is possible our sales could be curtailed or terminated or LEU could no longer be delivered to customers in those countries. This could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

Purchases of LEU by customers in the European Union are subject to a policy of the Euratom Supply Agency that seeks to limit foreign enriched uranium to no more than 20% of European Union consumption per year. Application of this policy to consumption in the European Union of the LEU that we supply or purchase can significantly limit our ability to make sales to European customers. Additionally, the decision by the United Kingdom to withdraw from the Euratom Supply Agency as a result of its decision to exit the European Union may have an impact on the nuclear industry.

Further, geopolitical events, including domestic or international reactions or responses to such events and subsequent government or international actions including the imposition of sanctions, could also impact our ability to purchase, sell or make deliveries of LEU to customers.

Certain emerging markets lack a comprehensive nuclear liability law that protects suppliers by channeling liability for injury and property damage suffered by third persons from nuclear incidents at a nuclear facility to the facility’s operator. To the extent a country does not have such a law and has not otherwise provided nuclear liability protection for suppliers to the projects to which we supply SWU, we intend to negotiate terms in customer contracts that we believe will adequately protect us in a manner consistent with this channeling principle. However, if a customer is unwilling to agree to such contract terms, the lack of clear protection for suppliers in the national laws of these countries could adversely affect our ability to compete for sales to meet the growing demand for LEU in these markets and our prospects for future revenue from such sales.



Changes to, or termination of, any agreements with the U.S. government, or deterioration in our relationship with the U.S. government, could adversely affect results of operations.

We are a party to a number of agreements and arrangements with the U.S. government that are important to our business, including:
the HALEU contract;
the lease for the Piketon, Ohio centrifuge facility; and
the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement and other agreements that address issues relating to the domestic uranium enrichment industry and centrifuge technology,

Termination, expiration or modification of one or more of these agreements could adversely affect our business and prospects. In addition, deterioration in our relationship with the U.S. agencies that are parties to these agreements could impair or impede our ability to successfully implement these agreements, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to adapt to a rapidly changing competitive environment in the nuclear industry.

The nuclear industry in general, and the nuclear fuel industry in particular, is in a period of significant change, which could significantly transform the competitive landscape we face. The uranium enrichment sector of the nuclear fuel cycle industry remains oversupplied, creating downward pressures on commodity pricing, with uncertainty regarding nuclear power generation. Changes in the competitive landscape may adversely affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, or create uncertainty. To address these changes, we may seek to adjust our cost structure and operations and evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions. We are actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which could involve, without limitation, changes in our capital structure, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies. In connection with any such transaction, we may seek additional debt or equity financing, contribute or dispose of assets, assume additional indebtedness, or partner with other parties to consummate a transaction. Any such transaction may not result in the intended benefits and could involve significant commitments of our financial and other resources. Legal and consulting costs incurred in connection with debt or equity financing transactions in development are deferred and subject to immediate expensing if such a transaction becomes less likely to occur. If the actions we take in response to industry changes are not successful, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Our business, financial and operating performance could be adversely affected by epidemics and other health related issues but not limited to the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic.

Pandemics and other health crises, such as the global COVID-19 outbreak, may disrupt global supply chains and day-to-day operations of the Company, our suppliers and our customers, which could materially adversely affect our operations. In this regard, global supply chains and the timely availability of products or product components imported from other nations, including SWU contained in LEU we purchase, could be materially disrupted by quarantines, slowdowns or shutdowns, border closings, and travel restrictions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic or other global pandemic or health crises. Further, impacts on our management and workforce could adversely impact our business. While we have contingency plans to carry on essential operations, these may not be able to mitigate all of the potential impacts. For example, since much of the work required under the HALEU Contract must be performed at our site, our progress under the HALEU Contract could be impacted in the event employees that are unable to work in-person at our site. These events may result in delays and increased costs in the performance of the HALEU Contract, delays in receiving imports of supplies or other business interruptions and delays which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.





Legal and Compliance Risks

Legal and compliance risks relate to risks arising from the government and regulatory environment and action, legal proceedings and compliance with policies and procedures, including those relating to integrity, financial reporting and environmental health and safety. Government and regulatory risk includes the risk that government or regulatory actions will impose additional costs on us or cause us to have to change our business models or practices.


Our operations are highly regulated by the U.S. government, including the NRC and the DOE as well as the States of Ohio and Tennessee.Tennessee and could be significantly impacted by changes in government policies and priorities.


Our operations, including the facilities we lease innear Piketon, Ohio, are subject to regulation by the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). The NRC has granted us two licenses for the Piketon facility, i.e.facility: a license for thea Lead Cascade test facility that was granted in February 2004, and a separate license to construct and operate a commercial plant that was granted in April 2007. Our license to construct and operate a commercial plant will expire on April 13, 2037. In June 2021, the NRC approved an amendment to permit HALEU production as a subset of the larger commercial plant license. We are currently performing work under a three-year contract with DOE for the construction and operations of a cascade to produce HALEU. PriorThis contract is currently set to the award of the contract we were in process of terminating our licenses and had demobilized programs and processes which are necessary to perform the work. To successfully complete the work in connection with the HALEU project, we withdrew the termination and are pursuing modifications to our NRC license for our commercial plant. There is no assurance that we will be able to re-instate the programs and processes necessary to perform the work in a timely and cost efficient manner. Further we may be unable to gain NRC approval of the necessary license modifications, or gaining such approval may take longer and increase costs.expire on June 1, 2022.


The NRC also could refuse to renew our license to construct and operate a commercial plant if it determines that: (1) we are foreign owned, controlled, or dominated; (2) the issuance of a renewed license would be inimical to the maintenance of a reliable and economic domestic source of enrichment; (3) the issuance of a renewed license would be adverse to U.S. defense or security objectives; or (4) the issuance of a renewed license is otherwise not consistent with applicable laws or regulations in effect at the time of renewal.


The NRC has the authority to issue notices of violation for violations of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the “Atomic Energy Act”), the NRC regulations and conditions of licenses, certificates of compliance, or orders. The NRC has the authority to impose civil penalties or additional requirements and to order cessation of operations for violations of its regulations. Penalties under the NRC regulations could include substantial fines, imposition of additional requirements, or withdrawal or suspension of licenses or certificates. Any penalties
27


imposed on us could adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity. The NRC also has the authority to issue new regulatory requirements or to change existing requirements. Changes to the regulatory requirements also could also adversely affect our results of operations.operations and financial condition.


In addition, certain operations atof our centrifuge technology development and manufacturing facility in Oak Ridge, Tennesseeoperations are subject to DOE regulation by DOE.or contractual requirements. Our facility in Oak Ridge is also regulated by the State of Tennessee under NRC’s agreementAgreement State Program as well as applicable state program. DOE and the State of Tennessee have the authority to impose civil penalties and additional requirements, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

In addition to regulation by the NRC, ourlaws. Our operations at the facility innear Piketon also are subject to regulation by various agencies of the Ohio state government. These state and federal agencies may have the authority to impose civil penalties and additional requirements, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Further, changes in federal, state or local government policies and priorities can impact our operations and the nuclear industry. This includes changes in interpretations of regulatory requirements, increased inspection or enforcement activities, changes in budgetary priorities, changes in tax laws and regulations and other actions or in-actions governments can take.




Our operations involve the use, transportation and disposal of toxic, hazardous and/or radioactive materials and could result in liability without regard to fault or negligence.


Our operations involve the use, transportation, and disposal of toxic, hazardous and radioactive materials. A release of these materials could pose a health risk to humans or animals. If an accident were to occur, its severity would depend on the volume of the release and the speed of corrective action taken by emergency response personnel, as well as other factors beyond our control, such as weather and wind conditions. Actions taken in response to an actual or suspected release of these materials, including a precautionary evacuation, could result in significant costs for which we could be legally responsible. In addition to health risks, a release of these materials may cause damage to, or the loss of, property and may adversely affect property values. Additionally, we may be responsible for decontamination or decommissioning of facilities where we conduct, or previously conducted, operations. Activities of our contractors, suppliers or other counterparties similarly may involve toxic, hazardous, and radioactive materials and we may be liable contractually, or under applicable law, to contribute to remedy damages or other costs arising from such activities, including the decontamination or decommission of third-party facilities.


We lease facilities from DOE innear Piketon, Ohio. Pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, as well as the HALEU Contract, DOE has agreed to indemnify the Company’s subsidiaries who are party to those agreements, and other Company entities who fall under the definition of a person indemnified under the CompanyAtomic Energy Act of 1954, against claims for public liability (as defined in the Atomic Energy Act) arising out of or in connection with activities under those leases and the HALEU Contract, as applicable, resulting from a nuclear incident or precautionary evacuation.evacuation including transportation. If an incident or evacuation is not covered under DOE indemnification, we could be financially liable for damages arising from such incident or evacuation, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The DOE indemnification does not apply to incidents outside the United States, including in connection with international transportation of uranium products.


While DOE has provided indemnification pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, there could be delays in obtaining reimbursement for costs from DOE and DOE may also determine that some or all costs are not reimbursable under the indemnification. In addition, the Price-Anderson Act indemnification does not cover loss or damage due to a nuclear incident to property located on the leased facilities due to a nuclear incident. For example, facilities.

Centrus and Enrichment Corp. have been named as defendants in class action lawsuits alleging damages resulting from releases at the facilities we leased in the past at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and the centrifuge facilities we still lease innear Piketon, Ohio. These claims include allegations of damages that the plaintiffs assert are not covered by the Price-Anderson Act, which claims we and the other defendants have challenged. If DOE were to determine that the Price-Anderson Act did not apply, we would have to pay all or part of any damages awarded as a result of such claims, the cost to us, including legal fees, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Refer to Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies — Legal Matters, of our consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report for further details.


In our contracts, we seek to protect ourselves from liability, but there is no assurance that such contractual limitations on liability will be effective in all cases. The costs of defending against a claim arising out of a nuclear
28


incident or precautionary evacuation, and any damages awarded as a result of such a claim, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our failure to maintain compliance with the listing requirements of the NYSE American could result in a delisting of our Class A Common Stock and would impair stockholders’ ability to sell or purchase our Class A Common Stock.

On November 17, 2015, we received notice from the NYSE American indicating that the Company was not in compliance with Sections 1003(a)(i) and (ii) of the NYSE American’s Company Guide since it reported a stockholders’ deficit as of September 30, 2015, and net losses in its fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. On April 28, 2017, the NYSE American informed Centrus that it had regained compliance with the NYSE American’s continued listing standards because it had resolved the continued listing deficiency. If the Company falls below any of the NYSE American’s continued listing standards in the future, the NYSE American may initiate delisting procedures as appropriate. A delisting of our Class A Common Stock by the NYSE American and the failure of our Class A Common Stock to be listed on another national exchange could have significant adverse consequences. A delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our Class A Common Stock and would impair stockholders’ ability to sell or purchase our Class A Common Stock. A delisting could also affect our access to capital resources.




Our certificate of incorporation gives us certain rights with respect to equity securities held (beneficially or of record) by foreign persons. If levels of foreign ownership set forth in our certificate of incorporation are exceeded, we have the right, among other things, to redeem or exchange common stock held by foreign persons, and in certain cases, the applicable redemption price or exchange value may be equal to the lower of fair market value or a foreign person’s purchase price.


Our certificate of incorporation gives us certain rights with respect to shares of our common stock held (beneficially or of record) by foreign persons. Foreign persons are defined in our certificate of incorporation to include, among others, an individual who is not a U.S. citizen, an entity that is organized under the laws of a non-U.S. jurisdiction and an entity that is controlled by individuals who are not U.S. citizens, or by entities that are organized under the laws of non-U.S. jurisdictions.


The occurrence of any one or more of the following events is a “foreign ownership review event” and triggers the board of directors’ right to take various actions under our certificate of incorporation: (1) the beneficial ownership by a foreign person of (a) 5% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of any class of our equity securities, (b) 5% or more in voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of all classes of our equity securities, or (c) less than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any class of our equity securities or less than 5% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of all classes of our equity securities, if such foreign person is entitled to control the appointment and tenure of any of our management positions or any director; (2) the beneficial ownership of any shares of any class of our equity securities by or for the account of a foreign uranium enrichment provider or a foreign competitor (defined in our certificate of incorporation as a “Contravening Person”); or (3) any ownership of, or exercise of rights with respect to, shares of any class of our equity securities or other exercise or attempt to exercise control of us that is inconsistent with, or in violation of, any regulatory restrictions, or that could jeopardize the continued operations of our facilities (defined in our certificate of incorporation as an “Adverse Regulatory Occurrence”). These rights include requesting information from holders (or proposed holders) of our securities, refusing to permit the transfer of securities by such holders, suspending or limiting voting rights of such holders, redeeming or exchanging shares of our stock owned by such holders on terms set forth in our certificate of incorporation, and taking other actions that we deem necessary or appropriate to ensure compliance with the foreign ownership restrictions.


The terms and conditions of our rights with respect to our redemption or exchange right in respect of shares held by foreign persons or Contravening Persons are as follows:

Redemption price or exchange value: Generally, the redemption price or exchange value for any shares of our common stock redeemed or exchanged would be their fair market value. However, if we redeem or exchange shares held by foreign persons or Contravening Persons and our Board in good faith determines that such person knew or should have known that its ownership would constitute a foreign ownership review event (other than shares for which our Board determined at the time of the person’s purchase that the ownership of, or exercise of rights with respect to, such shares did not at such time constitute an Adverse Regulatory Occurrence), the redemption price or exchange value is required to be the lesser of fair market value and the person’s purchase price for the shares redeemed or exchanged.
Form of payment: Cash, securities or a combination, valued by our board of directors in good faith.
Notice: At least 30 days written notice of redemption is required; however, if we have deposited the cash or securities for the redemption or exchange in trust for the benefit of the relevant holders, we may redeem shares held by such holders on the same day that we provide notice.


Accordingly, there are situations in which a foreign stockholder or Contravening Person could lose the right to vote its shares or in which we may redeem or exchange shares held by a foreign person or Contravening Person and
29


in which such redemption or exchange could be at the lesser of fair market value and the person’s purchase price for the shares redeemed or exchanged, which could result in a significant loss for that person.





General Risk Factors
Anti-takeover provisions
Failures to protect classified or other sensitive information, or security breaches of information technology (“IT”) systems could result in significant liability or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.

Our business requires us to use and protect classified, sensitive, and other protected information as well as business proprietary information and intellectual property (collectively, “sensitive information”). Our computer networks and other information technology (“IT”) systems are designed to protect this information through the use of classified networks and other procedures. We routinely experience various cybersecurity threats, threats to our information technology infrastructure, unauthorized attempts to gain access to the Company’s sensitive information, and denial-of-service attacks, as do our customers, suppliers, subcontractors, and other business partners. The threats we face vary from attacks common to most industries, attacks by more advanced and persistent, highly organized adversaries, including nation states, which target us and other government contractors because we protect national security information. If we are unable to protect sensitive information, our customers or governmental authorities could question the adequacy of our threat mitigation and detection processes and procedures, and depending on the severity of the incident, the Company’s data, customers’ data, our employees’ data, our intellectual property, and other third-party data could be compromised. As a consequence of the persistence, sophistication, and volume of these attacks, we may not be successful in defending against all such attacks. Due to the evolving nature of these security threats and the national security aspects of much of the data we protect, the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted.

We have a number of suppliers and indirect suppliers with a wide variety of systems and cybersecurity capabilities and we may not be successful in preventing adversaries from exploiting possible weak links in our supply chain. We also must rely on this supply chain for detecting and reporting cyber incidents, which could affect our ability to report or respond to cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means.

A material network breach in the security of the IT systems of the Company or third parties for any reasons, including, but not limited to, human error, could include the theft of sensitive information, including, without limitation, our and our customers’ business proprietary and intellectual property. To the extent any security breach or human error results in a loss or damage to sensitive information, or in inappropriate or unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information, the breach could cause grave damage to the country’s national security and to our business. Threats, via insider threat or third parties, to our IT systems, are constantly evolving and there is no assurance that our efforts to maintain and improve our IT systems will be sufficient to meet current or future threats. Any event leading to a security breach or loss of, or damage to, data, whether by our employees or third parties, could result in negative publicity, significant remediation costs, legal liability, and damage to our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. In an extreme case, DOE could terminate our permit to access classified information resulting in the elimination of our ability to continue American Centrifuge work or performance of DOE contracts, including the HALEU Contract.

The inability to attract and retain key personnel could have an adverse impact on our business.

The Company’s LEU and technical services segments require people with unique skills and experience in the uranium enrichment industry. It also requires people with U.S. security clearances. To train employees and obtain the required U.S. Security clearances for them can take considerable time and expense. The success of our business depends on key executives, managers, scientists, engineers and other skilled personnel. The ability to attract and retain these key personnel may be difficult in light of the uncertainties currently facing the business and changes we may make to the organizational structure to adjust to changing circumstances.

30


Changes in senior management could create uncertainty among our employees, customers, suppliers, and other third parties with which we do business. The inability to retain appropriately qualified and experienced senior executives could negatively affect our operations, strategic planning, and performance.

The potential for DOE to seek to terminate or exercise its remedies under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement and our other agreements with DOE, or to require modifications to such agreements that are adverse to our interests, may have adverse consequences on the Company.

The Company and DOE signed an agreement dated June 17, 2002, as amended (the “2002 DOE-USEC Agreement”), that requires the Company to develop, demonstrate, and deploy advanced enrichment technology in accordance with milestones and provides for remedies in the event of a failure to meet a milestone under certain circumstances. DOE has specific remedies under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement if we fail to meet a milestone or if we abandon or constructively abandon the commercial deployment of an advanced enrichment technology. These remedies include terminating the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement, revoking our access to DOE’s centrifuge technology that is required for the success of the American Centrifuge project, the HALEU Contract or other projects, requiring us to transfer certain rights in the American Centrifuge technology and facilities to DOE, and to reimburse DOE for certain costs associated with the American Centrifuge project.

We have granted to DOE an irrevocable, non-exclusive right to use or permit third parties on behalf of DOE to use all centrifuge technology intellectual property (“Centrifuge IP”) royalty free for U.S. government purposes (which includes national defense purposes, including providing nuclear material to operate commercial nuclear power reactors for tritium production). We also granted an irrevocable, non-exclusive license to DOE to use such Centrifuge IP developed at our expense for commercial purposes (including a right to sublicense), which may be exercised only if we miss any of the milestones under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement or if we (or our affiliate or entity acting through us) are no longer willing or able to proceed with, or have determined to abandon, or have constructively abandoned, the commercial deployment of the centrifuge technology. Such a commercial purposes license is subject to payment of an agreed upon royalty to us, which will not exceed $665 million in the aggregate. While our long-term objective is to commercially deploy the American Centrifuge technology when it is commercially feasible to do so, DOE may take the position that we are no longer willing or able to proceed with commercial deployment, or have actually, or constructively, abandoned commercial deployment, and could invoke its rights under the license described above. Any of these actions could adversely impact our business and prospects.

DOE may seek to exercise remedies under these agreements and there is no assurance that the parties will be able to reach agreement on appropriate modifications to the agreements in the future. Moreover, even if the parties reach agreement on modifications to such agreements, there is no assurance that such modifications will not impose material additional requirements, provide DOE with material additional rights or remedies, or otherwise affect the overall economics of the American Centrifuge technology and our ability to finance and successfully deploy the technology. Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our business and prospects.

Our U.S. government contract work is regularly reviewed and audited by the U.S. government and these reviews can lead to withholding or delay of payments to us, non-receipt of award fees, legal actions, fines, penalties and liabilities, and other remedies against us.

Our U.S. government contracts are subject to specific regulations such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation, among others, and also subject to audits, cost reviews, and investigations by the U.S. government contracting oversight agencies. Should a contracting agency determine that we have not complied with the terms of our contracts and applicable statutes and regulations, payments to us may be disallowed, which could result in adjustments to previously reported revenues and refunding of previously collected cash proceeds. Additionally, we may be subject to litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the U.S. government under the Federal False Claims Act, which could include claims for treble damages. If we experience performance issues under any of our U.S. government contracts, the U.S. government retains the right to pursue remedies, which could include termination under any affected contract. Termination of a contract could adversely affect our ability to secure future
31


contracts, and could have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our U.S. government contracts and subcontracts are dependent on continued U.S. government funding and government appropriations, which may not be made on a timely basis or at all, and could have an adverse effect on our business.

Current and future U.S. government contracts and subcontracts, including our HALEU Contract, are dependent on government funding, which are generally subject to Congressional appropriations. Our ability to perform under these federal contracts and subcontracts is dependent upon sufficient funding for, and timely payment by, the entities with which we have contracted. If the contracting governmental agency, or the prime contractor, does not receive sufficient appropriations, it may terminate our contract or subcontract (in whole or in part) or reduce scope of our contract or subcontract, or delay or prevent an acquisitionreduce payment to us. Any inability to award us a contract or subcontract, any delay in payment, or the termination of us.a contract or subcontract, in whole or in part, due to a lapse in funding or otherwise, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, or cash flows.


Changes to, or termination of, any agreements with the U.S. government, or deterioration in our relationship with the U.S. government, could adversely affect results of operations.

We are a Delaware corporation,party to a number of agreements and arrangements with the U.S. government that are important to our business including our HALEU Contract, the lease for the centrifuge facility near Piketon, Ohio, and the anti-takeover provisions2002 DOE-USEC agreement. Termination, expiration, or modification of Delaware law impose various impedimentsone or more of these or other agreements could adversely affect our business and prospects. In addition, deterioration in our relationship with the U.S. agencies that are parties to thethese agreements could impair or impede our ability to successfully implement these agreements, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of a third-party to acquire control of our Company, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In particular, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,operations, or DGCL, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder becomes an “interested” stockholder. cash flows.

Our certificate of incorporation, or charter, establishes restrictions on foreign ownership of our securities. Other provisions of our charter and bylaws may make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire control of us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include:
authorizing “blank check” preferred stock that our board of directors could issue to increase the number of outstanding shares to discourage a takeover attempt;
not providing for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;
limiting the ability of stockholders to call a special stockholder meeting;
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and
providing that our board of directors is expressly authorized to amend, alter, rescind or repeal our by-laws.

These various restrictions could deprive shareholders of the opportunity to realize takeover premiums for their shares.

Also, on April 6, 2016, we adopted a Rights Agreement between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. and Computershare Inc., as rights agent, as amended by the First Amendment to the Section 382 Rights Agreement dated as of February 14, 2017 (the “Rights Agreement”) in an effort to protect shareholder value by, among other things, attempting to protect against a possible limitationsuccess depends on our ability to useadapt to a rapidly changing competitive environment in the nuclear industry.

The uranium enrichment sector of the nuclear fuel cycle industry remains oversupplied, creating downward pressures on commodity pricing, with uncertainty regarding nuclear power generation. Changes in the competitive landscape may adversely affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, or create uncertainty. To address these changes, we may seek to adjust our net operating loss carryforwardscost structure and operations, and evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other taxstrategic transactions. We are actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which could involve, without limitation, changes in our capital structure, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products, or technologies. In connection with any such transaction, we may seek additional debt or equity financing, contribute or dispose of assets, assume additional indebtedness, or partner with other parties to consummate a transaction. Any such transaction may not result in the intended benefits whichand could involve significant commitments of our financial and other resources. Legal and consulting costs incurred in connection with debt or equity financing transactions in development are deferred and subject to immediate expensing if such a transaction becomes less likely to occur. If the actions we take in response to industry changes are not successful, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be used to reduce potential future income tax obligations. Pursuant to the terms of the Rights Agreement, if certain persons or groups acquire more than a certain amount of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock, then, subject to certain exceptions, the Rights Agreement would be triggered.adversely affected.


On April 3, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, and the Company entered into, a Second Amendment to the Rights Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment, among other things, (i) decreased the purchase price for each one one-thousandth (1/1000th) of a share of the Company’s Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, from $26.00 to $18.00 and (ii) extended the Final Expiration Date (as defined in the Rights Agreement) from April 5, 2019 to April 5, 2022.

In addition, the indenture governing our 8.25% Notes includes restrictions on our ability to engage in certain mergers or acquisitions. The indenture governing our 8.25% Notes also requires us to offer to repurchase all such outstanding notes at 101% of their outstanding principal amount in the event of certain change of control events.

These and other provisions could prevent, deter, or make it more difficult for a third party from acquiring us even where the acquisition could be beneficial to stockholders.



Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments


None.On December 20, 2021, we received a comment letter from the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance relating to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2021. The SEC requested additional information pertaining to the following matters: (a) use of certain non-GAAP measures, (b) presentation as revenue in 2020 of certain amounts we collected from a breach of contract claim against a prior customer that filed for bankruptcy and (c) presentation as revenue in 2021 of amounts we received pursuant to a settlement agreement with DOE for pension and post-retirement benefits for employees at the formerly leased Portsmouth GDP plant. With regards to

32


(a) we have revised our disclosures on non-GAAP measures in Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, beginning in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, in response to the Staff’s comments. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received notice from the Staff that its review process is complete.

Item 2. Properties


Our corporate headquarters is located at 6901 Rockledge Drive, Suite 800, Bethesda, Maryland 20817, where we lease 24,000 square feet of office space through October 2027. We own a 440,000 square foot manufacturing facility, including supporting office space, on 72 acres at 400 Centrifuge Way, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830. We also lease industrial buildings and 110,000 square feet of supporting office space from DOE at 3930 U.S. Route 23, Piketon, Ohio 45661. The industrial buildings encompass more than 14 acres under roof and were built to contain uranium enrichment operations using centrifuge technology. In May 2017, we entered into a lease through July 2021 for 6,000 square feet of office space at 14074 U.S. Highway 23, Waverly, Ohio. We also have a short-term leaseslease for a small areasarea of office space in Washington, DC and Tokyo, Japan.D.C.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings


From timeRefer to time, we are involved in various pending legal proceedings, including the pending legal proceedings described below.

On August 30, 2013, the Company submitted a claim to DOE under the Contract Disputes Act for paymentNote 16, Commitments and Contingencies — Legal Matters, of $42.8 million, representing DOE’s share of pension and postretirement benefits costs related to the transition of Portsmouth site employees to DOE’s D&D contractor. On August 27, 2014, the DOE contracting officer denied the Company’s claim. As a result, the Company filed an appeal of the decision in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in January 2015. Centrus believes that DOE is responsible for a significant portion of any pension and postretirement benefit costs associated with the transition of employees at Portsmouth. The receivable for DOE’s share of pension and postretirement benefits costs has a full valuation allowance due to the lack of a resolution with DOE and uncertainty regarding the amounts owed and the timing of collection. While proceeding with litigation, the Company is still pursuing settlement.

On May 26, 2019, the Company, its subsidiary United States Enrichment Corp. (“Enrichment Corp.”), and five other DOE contractors who have operated facilities at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Gaseous Diffusion Plant site (including, in the case of the Company, the American Centrifuge Plant site located on the premises (the “Portsmouth GDP” site) were named as defendants in a class action complaint filed by Ursula McGlone, Jason McGlone, Julia Dunham, and K.D. and C.D., minor children by and through their parent and natural guardian Julia Dunham (collectively, the “McGlone Plaintiffs”) in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. The complaint seeks damages for alleged off-site contamination allegedly resulting from activities on the Portsmouth GDP site. The McGlone Plaintiffs are seeking to represent a class of (i) all current or former residents within a seven-mile radius of the Portsmouth GDP site and (ii) all students and their parents at the Zahn’s Corner Middle School from 1993-present. The Company believes that its operations at the Portsmouth GDP site were fully in compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulations. Further the Company believes that any such liability should be covered by indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act. The Company and Enrichment Corp. have provided notifications to DOE required to invoke indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act and other contractual provisions.

On June 28, 2019, the Company, Enrichment Corp. and four other DOE contractors who have operated facilities at the Portsmouth GDP site were named as defendants in a class action complaint filed by Ray Pritchard and Sharon Melick (collectively, the “Pritchard Plaintiffs”) in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. The complaint seeks damages for alleged off-site contamination allegedly resulting from activities on the Portsmouth GDP site. The Pritchard Plaintiffs are seeking to represent a class of all current or former residents within a seven-mile radius of the Portsmouth GDP site. The Company believes that its operations at the Portsmouth GDP site were fully in compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulations. Further the Company believes that any such liability should be covered by indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act. The Company


and Enrichment Corp. have provided notifications to DOE required to invoke indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act and other contractual provisions.

On November 27, 2019, the Company, Enrichment Corp. and six other DOE contractors who have operated facilities at the Portsmouth GDP site were named as defendants in a class action complaint filed by James Matthews, Jennifer Brownfield Clark, Joanne Ross, the Estate of A.R., and others similarly situated (the “Matthews Plaintiffs”), in the Common Pleas Court of Pike County, Ohio. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, compensatory damages, statutory damages, and any other relief allowed by law for alleged off-site contamination allegedly resulting from activities on the Portsmouth GDP site. The Matthews Plaintiffs expressly contend that the ongoing and continuous releases that injured the Plaintiffs and Class Members are not “nuclear incidents” as that term is defined in the Price-Anderson Act, but rather “freestanding state law claims concerning traditional-style state regulation.” The Company believes that its operations at the Portsmouth GDP site were fully in compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulations. Further the Company believes that any such liability should be covered by indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act. The Company and Enrichment Corp. have provided notifications to DOE required to invoke indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act and other contractual provisions.

On October 11, 2018, the Company’s subsidiaries, Enrichment Corp. and American Centrifuge Enrichment, LLC (“ACE”, together with Enrichment Corp., the “Company Subsidiaries”) filed proofs of claim in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (the “Bankruptcy Court”) against each of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (“FENOC”), FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC (“FENG,” and together with FENOC, the “FirstEnergy Contract Parties”), FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (“FES”) and FirstEnergy Generation, LLC (“FG”). The claims relate to damages arising from the rejection and breach of a long-term contract between the Company Subsidiaries and the FirstEnergy Contract Parties that was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and made effective as of July 26, 2018. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries include claims against the FirstEnergy Contract Parties based on their liability as parties to the contract that was rejected and breached. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries also include claims against FES and FG based on their liability under guaranties they issued that may obligate FES and FG to satisfy the rejection and breach of contract damages claims.

On November 15, 2019, FENOC, FENG, FES and FG (collectively, the “FirstEnergy Debtors”) filed objections to the Company Subsidiaries’ claims in the Bankruptcy Court. No decision on the claims has yet been reached by the Bankruptcy Court. The Company Subsidiaries and the FirstEnergy Debtors have submitted cross motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether the guaranties apply. On March 13, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court ruled in favor of the FirstEnergy Debtors on their motion, finding that the guaranties did not apply to the Company Subsidiaries’ claims. The Company is considering its appeal rights. The ruling does not apply to the Company Subsidiaries’ claims against the FirstEnergy Contract Parties.

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, other than the above, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations or consolidated financial condition.statements in Part IV of this Annual Report.


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures


None.

33



PART II


Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


The Company’s certificate of incorporation authorizes 100,000,000 shares of common stock, consisting of 70,000,000 shares of Class A common stock,Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share (the “Class A Common Stock”) and 30,000,000 shares of Class B common stock,Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share (the “Class B Common Stock,” and together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”)., As of March 2, 2020,1, 2022, the Company has issued 9,472,38914,393,133 shares of Common Stock, consisting of 8,673,97613,673,933 shares of Class A Common Stock and 798,413719,200 shares of Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock was issued to Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation (“Toshiba”) and Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company (“B&W”) and has the same rights, powers, preferences and restrictions and ranks equally in all matters with the Class A Common Stock, except voting. Holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to elect, in the aggregate, two members of the Board of Directors of the Company, subject to certain holding requirements. Additionally, the Company has reserved 1,200,0001,900,000 shares of Class A Common Stock under its management incentive plan, of which approximately 422,000844,293 shares were available for future awards as of December 31, 2019,2021, including approximately 120,000 shares associated with awards which terminated or were cancelled without being exercised.


The Class A Common Stock trades on the NYSE American LLC (the “NYSE American”) under the symbol “LEU”.


As of March 2, 2020,1, 2022, there were 8,673,97613,673,933 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding. As of March 2, 2020,1, 2022, there were approximately 930850 holders of record and approximately 6,98614,360 beneficial owners of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. As of March 2, 2020,1, 2022, there were two holders of record of the Company’s Class B Common Stock.


No cash dividends were paid in 20182021 or 2019,2020, and we have no intention to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our Series B Preferred Stock provides that so long as any shares of our Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, we may not pay dividends on our Class A Common Stock (other than dividends payable in shares of Class A Common Stock). In addition, theThe indenture governing our 8.25% Notes, subject to certain exceptions, places certain restrictions on the ability of Enrichment Corp. to transfer cash and other assets to us. This could act as an additionala constraint on our ability to pay dividends on our Class A Common Stock.

In addition, we are obligated to pay cash dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock to the extent that (1) our pension plans and Enrichment Corp.’s pension plans are at least 90% funded on a variable rate premium calculation in the current plan year, (2) our net income calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP (excluding the effect of pension remeasurement) for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds $7.5 million, (3) our free cash flow (defined as the sum of cash provided by (used in) operating activities and cash provided by (used in) investing activities) for the immediately preceding four fiscal quarters exceeds $35.0 million, (4) the balance of cash and cash equivalents calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP on the last day of the immediately preceding quarter would exceed $150.0 million after pro forma application of the dividend payment, and (5) dividends may be legally payable under Delaware law. We did not meet the criteria for a dividend payment obligation for the year ended December 31, 2019, and we have not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock since issuance on February 14, 2017.


There were no unregistered sales of equity securities by the Company during the years ended December 31, 20192021 or 2018.2020.



34


Fourth Quarter 20192021 Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities


None.  On November 23, 2021, pursuant to a tender offer announced on October 20, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of 36,867 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, at a price per share of $1,145.20, less any applicable withholding taxes, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $42.2 million. The accepted shares represent 97.4% of the Company’s outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2021. Based on the final results, the requisite consent of at least 90% of the outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock required to approve the Series B Preferred Amendment was obtained. On November 23, 2021, the Company issued a Notice of Full Redemption providing for the redemption of any and all shares of the Company’s Series B Senior Preferred Stock outstanding after consummation of the Company’s tender offer to purchase all of its issued and outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock. On December 15, 2021, the Company completed the redemption of all 980 outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock for aggregate cash consideration of $1.1 million. The purchase price per share represented a 15% discount from the aggregate liquidation preference, included accrued but unpaid dividends, of $1,347.29 per share as of September 30, 2021. These shares represented all of the Company’s remaining outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock.




Matters Affecting our Foreign Stockholders
 
In order to aid in our compliance with our NRC license, our certificate of incorporation gives us certain rights with respect to shares of our Common Stock held (beneficially or of record) by foreign persons. Foreign persons are defined in our certificate of incorporation to include, among others, an individual who is not a U.S. citizen, an entity that is organized under the laws of a non-U.S. jurisdiction, and an entity that is controlled by individuals who are not U.S. citizens or by entities that are organized under the laws of non-U.S. jurisdictions.


The occurrence of any one or more of the following events is a “foreign ownership review event” and triggers the board of directors’ right to take various actions under our certificate of incorporation: (1) the beneficial ownership by a foreign person of (a) 5% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of any class of our equity securities, (b) 5% or more in voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of all classes of our equity securities, or (c) less than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any class of our equity securities or less than 5% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of all classes of our equity securities, if such foreign person is entitled to control the appointment and tenure of any of our management positions or any director; (2) the beneficial ownership of any shares of any class of our equity securities by or for the account of a foreign uranium enrichment provider or a foreign competitor (referred to as “contravening persons”); or (3) any ownership of, or exercise of rights with respect to, shares of any class of our equity securities or other exercise or attempt to exercise control of us that is inconsistent with, or in violation of, any regulatory restrictions, or that could jeopardize the continued operations of our facilities (an “adverse regulatory occurrence”). These rights include requesting information from holders (or proposed holders) of our securities, refusing to permit the transfer of securities by such holders, suspending or limiting voting rights of such holders, redeeming or exchanging shares of our stock owned by such holders on terms set forth in our certificate of incorporation, and taking other actions that we deem necessary or appropriate to ensure compliance with the foreign ownership restrictions.


For information regarding the foreign ownership restrictions set forth in our certificate of incorporation, please refer to — Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - Our certificate of incorporation gives us certain rights with respect to equity securities held (beneficially or of record) by foreign persons. If levels of foreign ownership set forth in our certificate of incorporation are exceeded, we have the right, among other things, to redeem or exchange common stock held by foreign persons, and in certain cases, the applicable redemption price or exchange value may be equal to the lower of fair market value or a foreign person’s purchase price.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data[Reserved]


Not provided as a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.




35


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements particularly in light of the economic, social and market uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic and the evolving events regarding the war in Ukraine. See also“Forward-Looking Statements” at the section titled “Forward-Looking Statements.”beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


36


Overview


Centrus Energy Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Centrus” or the “Company”), is a trusted supplier of nuclear fuel and services for the nuclear power industry.industry, which provides a reliable source of carbon free energy. References to “Centrus”, the “Company”, “our”, or “we” include Centrus Energy Corp. and its wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the predecessor to Centrus, unless the context otherwise indicates.indicates otherwise.


Centrus operates two business segments: (a) low-enriched uranium (“LEU”), which supplies various components of nuclear fuel to utilities,commercial customers from our global network of suppliers, and (b) technical solutions, which provides advanced engineering, design, and manufacturing services to government and private sector customers. The technical solutions segment was formerly our contract services segment. The segment was renamed the technical solutions segment on December 31, 2019, to better reflect the nature of work performedcustomers and is consistent with our marketingdeploying uranium enrichment and other capabilities necessary for production of service offerings as Centrus Technical Solutions. There was no changeadvanced nuclear fuel to power existing and next-generation reactors around the composition of the segment as a result of the re-naming.world.


Our LEU segment provides most of the Company’s revenue and involves the sale of LEU, its components, and natural uraniumnuclear fuel to customers that are primarily utilities operatingthat operate commercial nuclear power plants. The majority of these sales are for the enrichment component of LEU, which is measured in separative work units (“SWU”). Centrus also sells natural uranium (the raw material needed to produce LEU) and occasionally sells LEU with the natural uranium, uranium conversion, and SWU components combined into one sale.

LEU is a critical component in the production of nuclear fuel for reactors that produce electricity. We supply LEU and its components to both domestic and international utilities for use in nuclear reactors worldwide. We provide LEU from multiple sources, including our inventory, medium-medium and long- termlong-term supply contracts, and spot purchases. As a long-term supplier of LEU to our customers, our objective is to provide value through the reliability and diversity of our supply sources.

Our global order book includes long-term goal issales contracts with major utilities through 2029. We have secured cost-competitive supplies of SWU under long-term contracts through the end of this decade to resume commercial enrichment production,allow us to fill our existing customer orders and we are exploring approachesmake new sales. A market-related price reset provision in our largest supply contract took effect at the beginning of 2019 – when market prices for SWU were near historic lows – which has significantly lowered our cost of sales and contributed to that end.improved margins. Spot price indicators for SWU have risen by approximately 65% to $56 as of December 31, 2021, since bottoming out in August 2018.


In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce reached agreement with the Russian Federation on an extension of the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement (“RSA”), a trade agreement which allows for Russian-origin nuclear fuel to be exported to the United States in limited quantities. The two parties agreed to extend the agreement through 2040 and to set aside a significant portion of the quota for Centrus’ shipments to the United States through 2028 to execute our long-term supply (purchase) agreement (the “TENEX Supply Contract”) with the Russian government entity, TENEX, Joint-Stock Company (“TENEX”). This outcome allows for sufficient quota for Centrus to continue serving its utility customers.

Our technical solutions segment utilizesis deploying uranium enrichment and other capabilities necessary for production of advanced nuclear fuel to meet the evolving needs of the global nuclear industry and the U.S. government, while also leveraging our unique technical expertise, operational experience and specialized facilities that we developed over nearly two decades as part of our uranium enrichment technology program. We are leveraging these capabilities to expand and diversify our business beyond uranium enrichment, offering new services to existing and new customers in complementary markets.


WithOur technical solutions segment is dedicated to the specialized capabilities and workforce at our Technology and Manufacturing Center in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, we are performing technical, engineering and manufacturing services for a rangerestoration of commercial and government customers and actively working to secure new customers. Our experience developing, licensing, manufacturing and operating advanced nuclear components and systems positions us to provide critical design, engineering, manufacturing and other services to a broad range of potential clients, including those involving sensitive or classified technologies. This work includes design, engineering, manufacturing and licensing services support for advanced reactor and fuel fabrication projects as well as decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D”) work.

With several decades of experience in enrichment, we continue to be a leader in the development of an advanced U.S.America’s domestic uranium enrichment technology, which we believe couldcapability to play a critical role in supplying fuel for advanced reactors, meeting U.S. national security and energy security needs,requirements, advancing America’s nonproliferation objectives, repairing broken and achieving our nation’svulnerable supply chains, providing good clean energy jobs and supporting the communities in which we operate, and in delivering the next-generation nuclear fuels that will power the future of nuclear energy as it provides reliable carbon-free power around the world.

37


The United States has not had a domestic uranium enrichment capability suitable to meet U.S. national security requirements since the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (“Paducah GDP”) shut down in 2013. Longstanding U.S. policy and binding nonproliferation objectives.agreements prohibit the use of foreign-origin enrichment technology for U.S. national security missions. Our AC100M centrifuge is currently the only deployment-ready U.S. uranium enrichment technology in the U.S. that can meet these national security requirements.


On October 31, 2019, we signed a three-year cost-share contract (the “HALEU Contract”) with DOECentrus is working to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstratepioneer U.S. production of high-assay, low-enriched uraniumHigh-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (“HALEU”) fuel with existing United States origin enrichment technology and provide DOE with HALEU, enabling the deployment of a new generation of HALEU-fueled reactors to meet the world’s growing need for near term use in its research and development for the advancement of civilian nuclear energy and national security, as well as other programmatic missions. The program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when the Company and DOE signed a preliminary agreement that allowed work to begin while the HALEU Contract was being finalized.


Under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million. The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs incurred above these amounts. Costs under the HALEU Contract include program costs, including direct labor and materials and associated indirect costs that are classified as Cost of Sales, and an allocation of corporate costs supporting the program that are classified as Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Services to be provided over the three-year contract include constructing and assembling centrifuge machines and related infrastructure in a cascade formation. When estimates of remaining program costs to be incurred for such an integrated, construction-type contract exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the remaining loss on the contract is recorded to Cost of Sales in the period the loss is determined. Our corporate costs supporting the program are recognized as expense as incurred over the duration of the contract term. As of December 31, 2019, the portion of our anticipated cost share under the HALEU Contract representing our share of remaining projected program costs was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million. The accrued loss on the contract will be adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results and remaining program cost projections.

carbon-free power. HALEU is a high-performance nuclear fuel component of an advanced nuclear reactor fuel thatwhich is not commercially available today and mayexpected to be required forby a number of advanced reactor and fuel designs currentlythat are now under development in both thefor commercial and government sectors. Existinguses. While existing reactors typically operate on LEU with the uranium-235 isotope concentration below 5%., HALEU has ais further enriched so that the uranium-235 concentration ranging fromis between 5% and 20%. The higher U-235 concentration offers a number of potential advantages, which may include better fuel utilization, improved performance, fewer refueling outages, simpler reactor designs, reduced waste volumes, and greater nonproliferation resistance.

The lack of a domestic HALEU supply is widely viewed as a major obstacle to 20%, giving it several potential technical and economic advantages.the successful commercialization of these new reactors. For example, in surveys conducted by the higher concentrationU.S. Nuclear Industry Council in 2021 and 2020, advanced reactor developers indicated that the number one issue that “keeps you up at night” was access to HALEU. As the only company with a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) to enrich up to 20% uranium-235 assay HALEU, Centrus is uniquely positioned to fill a critical gap in the supply chain and facilitate the deployment of uranium-235 meansthese promising next-generation reactors.

The DOE has experienced a COVID-19 related supply chain delay in obtaining the HALEU storage cylinders. Since it is not possible to begin HALEU production without the storage cylinders, it would not be possible to complete the operational portion of the demonstration before the June 1, 2022 expiration date of the existing HALEU Contract. As a result, the DOE elected to change the scope of the HALEU Contract and move the operational portion of the demonstration to a new, competitively-awarded contract that fuel assemblieswould provide for operations beyond the term of the existing contract. On February 7, 2022, DOE issued a pre-solicitation notice for a request for proposal to complete the HALEU demonstration facility and reactors can be smallerto produce HALEU, noting that the “the Administration supports longer-term demonstration of production capability.” The pre-solicitation notice outlines a two-phase approach. Phase 1 consists of completing installation of the centrifuges – which DOE expects will take up to one year from contract signing – followed by one full year of cascade operations. The second phase consists of three optional, 3-year extensions to produce HALEU, so that the prospective contract could help support a total of one to ten years of cascade operations in addition to completing construction and reactorscentrifuge installation.

Centrus believes it is well-positioned to compete for a follow-on contract with DOE to operate the machines in Piketon but there is no assurance that the DOE will require less frequent refueling. Reactors can also achieve higher “burnup” rates, meaningaward such a smaller volumecontract to the Company. Congress has not yet adopted a Fiscal Year 2022 appropriations bill for the DOE, and there is no assurance that the proposed program, which would go beyond the scope and expiration of fuelour existing contract, will be required overallapproved and less waste will be produced.funded.

The U.S. government has been operating under a series of continuing resolutions in Fiscal Year 2022. The DOE continues to support the HALEU may also be usedprogram during the continuing resolution period, and has incrementally increased the government’s cost share ceiling as funds have become available. Currently, DOE has provided additional funding, and increased the government’s cost share ceiling to $126.7 million.

Additional COVID-19 related impacts, delays in the futureDOE furnishing equipment, or changes to fabricate next-generation fuel forms for the existing fleetscope of reactorsthe HALEU Contract could result in further material increases to our estimate of the United Statescosts required to complete the existing HALEU Contract, as well as delay completion of the contract. The Company does not currently have a contractual obligation to perform work in excess of the funding provided by DOE and, around therefore, no additional loss has been accrued as of December 31, 2021. If DOE does not commit to fully fund
38


the world. These new HALEU-based fuelsadditional costs, and the Company nevertheless commits to a plan to complete the demonstration cascade and produce HALEU, we may incur material additional costs or losses in future periods that could improve the economics of nuclear reactorshave an adverse impact on our financial condition and inherent safety features while increasing the amount of electricity that can be generated at existing reactors. HALEU fuel may also ultimately be used in new commercial and government applications in the future, such as reactors for the military.liquidity.

We believe our investment in the HALEU technology will position the Company to meet the needs of ourgovernment and commercial customers in the future as they deploy advanced reactors and next generation fuels. At present, there are a number of advanced reactors under development. For example, of the ten advanced reactor designs selected by the U.S. Department of Energy for its Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program, nine will require HALEU.In addition, the first non-light water reactor to have begun active NRC-license review requires HALEU.The U.S. Department of Defense also plans to construct a prototype HALEU-fueled mobile microreactor in the next three to four years as part of a program called “Project Pele.”The U.S. Air Force also announced plans to deploy a microreactor at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska.While the use of HALEU is not an express requirement of the Air Force program, the vast majority of microreactor designs are expected to need HALEU.

Advanced nuclear reactors promise to provide an important source of reliable carbon-free power. By investing in HALEU technology now, and as the only domestically-ownedAmerican-based company withcurrently pursuing HALEU enrichment capability, we believe the Company could beis well positioned to capitalize on a potential new market as the demand for HALEU-based fuels increases in the mid to late-2020s with the development of advanced reactors. ThereHowever, there are no guarantees about whether or when government or commercial demand for HALEU will materialize, and there are a number of technical, regulatory, and economic hurdles that must be overcome for these fuels and reactors to come to the market. Also, foreign government-owned and government-operated competitors could seek to enter the market and offer HALEU at more competitive prices. There is one known foreign government-owned source which currently has the capability to produce HALEU although this source is currently subject to trade restrictions that limit the amount of material from this source which may be imported into the United States. Other foreign government-owned entities which are not currently subject to U.S. trade restrictions, however, may enter the market. One such foreign-government owned entity has expressed an interest in and potential capability for HALEU production but has not committed publicly to enter the market to enrich above 10% uranium-235 enrichment assays. This entity has indicated publicly that it would take six to seven years to be able to produce HALEU.


The nuclear industry in general, and the nuclear fuel industry in particular, is in a period of significant change, whichCompany continues to affectreview opportunities to improve its capital structure and to enhance shareholder value. As a result, pursuant to a sales agreement with its agents, the competitive landscape. Company sold at the market price an aggregate of 1,516,467 shares of its Class A Common Stock in 2021, for a total of $44.2 million. After expenses and commissions paid to the agents the Company’s proceeds total $42.4 million. Additionally, the Company recorded direct costs of $0.3 million related to the issuance. The shares of Class A Common Stock were issued pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239242), which became effective on August 5, 2020, and a prospectus supplement dated December 31, 2020 to the prospectus, dated August 5, 2020. At present, the Company has $5.8 million remaining available for sale under the prospectus supplement dated December 31, 2020, and may from time to time sell additional shares through the sales agreement at the then market price. The Company currently intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for general working capital purposes, to invest in technology development, or to repay outstanding debt.

In addition and in connection with the entry into an amendment (the “Voting Agreement Amendment”) to its existing Voting and Nomination Agreement with Mr. Morris Bawabeh, Kulayba LLC and M&D Bawabeh Foundation, Inc., the Company and Kulayba LLC also entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated February 2, 2021 (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which Kulayba LLC agreed to exchange (the “Exchange”) 3,873 shares of the Company’s outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, representing a $5,000,198 liquidation preference (including accrued and unpaid dividends), for (i) 231,276 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, priced at the closing market price of $21.62 on the date the Exchange Agreement was signed and (ii) a Centrus Energy Corp. Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (the “Warrant”), exercisable for 250,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $21.62 per share, which
39


was the closing market price on the date the Exchange Agreement was signed, subject to certain customary adjustments pursuant to the terms of the Warrant. The Company retired the 3,873 shares of Series B Senior Preferred Stock received by the Company under the Exchange Agreement.

On November 23, 2021, pursuant to a tender offer announced on October 20, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of 36,867 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $1,145.20, less any applicable withholding taxes, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $42.2 million. On November 23, 2021, the Company issued a Notice of Full Redemption providing for the redemption of any and all shares of the Company’s Series B Senior Preferred Stock outstanding after consummation of the Company’s tender offer to purchase all of its issued and outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock. On December 15, 2021, the Company completed the redemption of all 980 outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock for aggregate cash consideration of $1.1 million. The aggregate purchase price of $43.3 million was offset by direct costs totaling $0.9 million. For additional details, refer to Note 15,Stockholders’ Equity, of the consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report.

In the years following the 2011 Fukushima accident in Japan, the published market prices for uranium enrichment declined more than 75%. through mid-2018. While the monthly price indicators have gradually started to increase beginning in 2018,since increased, the uranium enrichment segment of the nuclear fuel market remains oversupplied and faces uncertainty about future demand for nuclear power generation. Changes in the competitive landscape affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, and create uncertainty. To address these changes, we have taken steps to adjust our cost structure andstructure; we may seek further adjustments to our cost structure and operations and to evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.


We are also actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which could involve, without limitation, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies, or changes to our capital structure. In connection with any such transaction, we may seek additional debt or equity financing, contribute or dispose of assets, assume additional indebtedness, or partner with other parties to consummate a transaction.


Refer to Part I, Item 1, Business, for additional information.



COVID-19 Update


The Company has taken actions to protect its workforce and to maintain critical operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Travel, operational, and other restrictions imposed by the U.S. and foreign governments may impact our ability to make future sales and may impact the ability of our suppliers, including our suppliers of low enriched uranium, to perform under their contracts. As of the date of this filing, our LEU segment operations have not been materially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and we are working with our suppliers, fabricators, and customers to monitor the situation closely, including with respect to the impact of emerging variants. However, our technical solutions segment has been impacted by supply chain disruptions and increased costs as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Further, the governments of states and counties in which we operate have from time to time issued orders imposing various restrictions, including prohibiting holding gatherings and closing nonessential businesses. Many of these restrictions remain in place and we continue to monitor and adjust as necessary. The Company has issued a policy requiring vaccinations subject to medical, religious and other exemptions as required by law. In some cases, state laws preclude us from fully implementing our vaccination policy. The Company has also continued other measures to protect its workforce such as expanded telework to protect our workforce, to comply with government orders, and to maintain critical operations. We are working closely with DOE and we are continuing to make progress while implementing measures to protect our workforce. Further, the actions taken by our suppliers and government regulatory agencies to protect their workforces may impact our ability to obtain the necessary supplies and governmental reviews and approvals to timely complete the HALEU
40


project. We are experiencing delays by our suppliers and increased costs from them as a result of the impact of the COVID-19.

For further discussion, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - Our business, financial and operating performance could be adversely affected by epidemics and other health related issues including but not limited to the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic.

Market Conditions and Outlook


The global nuclear industry outlook has begun to improve after many years of decline or stagnation. The development of advanced small and large-scale reactors, innovative advanced fuel types, and the commitment of nations to begin deploying or to increase the share of nuclear power in their nations has created optimism in the market. Part of the momentum has resulted from efforts to lower greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change and improve health and safety.

According to the World Nuclear Association, as of January 2022, there were 57 reactors under construction worldwide, almost a third of which are in China. The industry continues to face headwinds, however, as low cost electricity generation sources, resistance to nuclear power, and the high costs of deploying nuclear power impede expansion of the nuclear industry. Threats of trade actions that could impact the nuclear fuel supply chain is an overhang on the industry.

While a majority of the growth of nuclear power remains centered in China, India and Russia, the United States, with 96 commercial93 operating reactors, in operation, remains the world’s largest market for nuclear fuel, butfuel. The nuclear industry in the U.S.United States, Japan, and Europe faces headwinds as well as opportunities. In the United States, the industry remainsis under some duress due to lowpressure from lower cost natural gas pricesresources and an increase in the expansion of subsidized renewable sources, all of which have put financial pressure on some reactor operators.energy. Eight U.S. reactors have beenprematurely shut down in the U.S. in recent years and several more face the prospect of prematureothers could shut down in the near-term.next few years. At the same time, there are active efforts to develop, demonstrate, and deploy next generation reactors in the United States, many of which are expected to require HALEU.
    
The nuclear fuel industry continues to attempt to recover from the March 2011 incident in Fukushima, Japan, that occurred from an earthquake and tsunami thatwhich caused irreparable damage to four reactors in Fukushima. As a consequence, approximately 60 reactors in Japan and Germany were taken offline, and other countries curtailed or slowed their construction of new reactors or accelerated theirthe retirement of existing plants. While someten reactors in Japan have restarted and manymore are expected to restart, during the next five years, supply and demand dynamics for nuclear fuel continue to be somewhat depressed.impacted.


While the market for uranium enrichment for nuclear fuel is expected to remaincurrently oversupplied, into the 2020s, the market demand is expected to grow as the nuclear power industry expands around the world. During 2019, pricesOver the past few years, prices for nuclear fuel, especially conversion and enrichment, have risen significantly. According to the World Nuclear Association, aroundaround 10% of the world's electricity is generated by about 440437 nuclear reactors, and an additional 5057 or so reactors are under construction. During 2020,Recently, two nations new to nuclear new build nations are expected to startenergy generation started their first commercial reactors. The newNew reactor builds will have added new demand for nuclear fuel suppliers.

The recent action of Russian military forces in Ukraine has escalated tensions between Russia and the U.S. The U.S. has imposed, and is likely to impose additional, financial and economic sanctions and export controls against certain Russian organizations and/or individuals. The U.S. imposed financial and economic sanctions that, in various ways, constrain transactions with Russian entities and individuals. While the current sanctions and export controls do not affect the Company’s supply agreement with TENEX, additional sanctions and trade restrictions by the U.S., as well as any actions by Russia, could adversely affect our business. The Company is monitoring the situation closely and assessing the potential impact of any new sanctions and how the impact on the Company might be mitigated.

41



Operating Results

Our revenues, operating results, and cash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to improvequarter and year to year.Our sales order book in the LEU segment consists primarily of long-term, fixed commitment contracts, and we have visibility on a significant portion of our revenue for 2022-2026.

In 2021 and 2020, we benefited from collections of $43.5 million and $32.6 million, respectively. In 2021, we collected $43.5 million related to the settlement of the Company’s claims for reimbursements for certain pension and postretirement benefits costs incurred in connection with a past cost-reimbursable contract performed at the Portsmouth GDP, recognized as revenue within our technical solutions segment. In 2020, we collected $32.6 million from a customer in settlement of a supply contract that was subject to the customer’s bankruptcy proceeding, recognized as revenue within our LEU segment.

Based on our current order book and under current market conditions, we anticipate fiscal year 2022 revenues and gross margins in the long-term.LEU segment to be higher than 2021. Please see Forward Looking Statements at the beginning of this Annual Report.


With respect to our technical solutions segment, work under the HALEU Contract currently remains on schedule but we have been experiencing increased delays from vendors and increased costs due to the continuing COVID pandemic. We are working with DOE to minimize the impacts and to obtain funding for these additional costs. Additional funding commitments from DOE and a contract amendment will be required to complete the project. Refer to Overview above for additional details.

Our order book of sales under contract in the LEU segment (“order book”) extends to 2029. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, our order book was approximately $986 million and $960 million, respectively. The order book is the estimated aggregate dollar amount of revenue for future SWU and uranium deliveries, and includes approximately $348.2 million of deferred revenue and advances from customers as of December 31, 2021, whereby customers have made advance payments to be applied against future deliveries. We estimate that approximately 3% of our order book is at risk related to customer operations. Due to the nature of the long-term contracts and our order book, we have visibility of a significant portion of our anticipated revenue for 2022 and 2023 in the LEU segment. However, these long-term contracts are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including existing import laws and restrictions under current contracts such as, the Russian Suspension Agreement, which limits imports of Russian uranium products into the United States and applies to our sales using material procured under the TENEX Supply Contract, as well as the potential for sanctions and other restrictions on trade with Russia or in dealings with Russian person and entities, in response to the evolving situation regarding the war in Ukraine. For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - (1) Restrictions on imports or sales of SWU or uranium that we buy from our Russian supplier and our other sources of supply could adversely affect profitability and the viability of our business, and - (2) The dollar amount of the sales order book, as stated at any given time, is not necessarily indicative of future sales revenues and is subject to uncertainty.

Our future operating results are subject to a number of uncertainties that could affect results either positively or negatively. Among the factors that could affect our results are the following:
Additional purchases or sales of SWU and uranium;
Conditions in the LEU and energy markets, including pricing, demand, operations, government restrictions on imports, exports or investments, and regulations of our business and activities and those of our customers, suppliers, contractors, and subcontractors;
Timing of customer orders, related deliveries, and purchases of LEU or components;
Costs, future funding, and demand for HALEU;
42


Financial market conditions and other factors that may affect pension and benefit liabilities and the value of related assets;
The outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies;
Potential use of cash for strategic or financial initiatives;
Actions taken by customers, including actions that might affect existing contracts;
Market, international trade, and other conditions impacting Centrus’ customers and the industry;
Armed conflicts, including the war in Ukraine, government actions and other events that disrupt supply chains, production, transportation, payments and importation of nuclear materials or other critical supplies or services; and,
The length and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our operations.

Revenue


We have two reportable segments: the LEU segment and the technical solutions segment.
Revenue from our LEU segment is derived primarily from: 
sales of the SWU component of LEU;
sales of both the SWU and natural uranium components of LEU; and
sales of natural uranium.


Our technical solutions segment reflects our technical, manufacturing, engineering, and operations services offered to public and private sector customers, including engineering and testing activities as well as technical and resource support currently being performed by the Company. This includes our agreement with DOE to demonstratethe HALEU productionContract and a variety of other contracts with public and private sector customers.


SWU and Uranium Sales


Revenue from our LEU segment accounted for approximately 81%62% of our total revenue in 2019.2021. The majority of our customers are domestic and international utilities that operate nuclear power plants, with international sales constituting approximatelyover one-third of revenue from our LEU segment in recent years. Our agreements with electric utilities are primarily medium and long-term fixed-commitment contracts under which our customers are obligated to purchase a specified quantity of the SWU component of LEU from us. Our agreements for natural uranium and


enriched uranium product sales,Contracts where we sell both the SWU and natural uranium component of LEU to utilities or where we sell natural uranium to utilities and other nuclear fuel related companies are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts.


Our revenues, operating results and cash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. Revenue is recognized at the time LEU or uranium is delivered under the terms of our contracts. The timing of customer deliveries is affected by, among other things, electricity markets, reactor operations, maintenance and refueling outages, and customer inventories. In the current market environment,Based on customers’ individual needs, some customers are building inventories and may choose to take deliveries under annual purchase obligations later in the year.year or in subsequent years. Customer payments for the SWU component of LEU average roughly $10$7.4 million per order. As a result, a relatively small changeshift in the timing of customer orders for LEU may cause significant variability in operating results.results year over year.


Utility customers, in general, have the option to defer receipt of SWU and natural uranium products purchased from Centrus beyond the contractual sale period, resulting in the deferral of costs and revenue recognition. Refer to Note 2, Revenue and Contracts with Customers, in the consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report for further details.


43


Our financial performance over time can be significantly affected by changes in prices for SWU and natural uranium. Since 2011, market prices for SWU and uranium have significantly declined.declined until mid-2018, when they began to trend upward. Since our sales order book includes contracts awarded to us in previous years, the average SWU price billed to customers typically lags behind published price indicators by several years. While newer sales reflect the low prices prevalent in recent years, certain older contracts included in our order book have sales prices that are significantly above current market prices.


The long-term SWU price indicator, as published by TradeTech, LLC in Nuclear Market Review, is an indication of base-year prices under new long-term enrichment contracts in our primary markets. The following chart summarizes TradeTech’s long-term and spot SWU price indicators, and TradeTech’sa spot price indicator for natural uranium hexafluoride (“UF6”), as published by TradeTech, LLC in Nuclear Market Review:


SWU and Uranium Market Price Indicators*
chart-a46eb884cdfad737b1a.jpgleu-20211231_g2.jpg
* Source: Nuclear Market Review, a TradeTech publication, www.uranium.info




Our contracts with customers are denominated primarily denominated in U.S. dollars and although revenue has not been directlymaterially affected by changes in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar, we may have a competitive price advantage or disadvantage obtaining new contracts in a competitive bidding process depending upon the weakness or strength of the U.S. dollar. On occasion, we will accept payment in euros for spot sales that may be subject to short-term exchange rate risk. Costs of our primary competitors are denominated in other currencies. Our contracts with suppliers have historically beenare primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. In 2018, however, we entered into anWe have a SWU supply agreement, nominally commencing in 2023, with Orano Cycle (“Orano”) for the long-term supply of SWU. We may elect to begin deliveries as early as 2021. Purchases under the contract with Orano will beprices payable in a combination of U.SU.S. dollars and euros, and we may be subject tobut with a contract defined exchange rate risk for the portion of purchases payable in euros.rate.


On occasion, we will accept payment for SWU in the form of natural uranium. Revenue from the sale of SWU under such contracts is recognized at the time LEU is delivered and is based on the fair value of the natural uranium at contract inception, or as the quantity of natural uranium is finalized, if variable.


44



Cost of sales for SWU and natural uranium is based on the amount of SWU and natural uranium sold and delivered during the period and unit inventory costs. Unit inventory costs are determined using the average cost method. Changes in purchase costs have an effect on inventory costs and cost of sales over current and future periods.sales. Cost of sales includes costs for inventory management at off-site licensed locations. Cost of sales also includes certain legacy costs related to former employees of the Portsmouth GDP and Paducah gaseous diffusion plants.GDP.

Market Uncertainties

Imports into the United States of LEU and other uranium products produced in the Russian Federation, including LEU imported by Centrus under the Russian Supply Agreement, are subject, through December 31, 2020, to quotas imposed under legislation enacted into law in September 2008 and under the 1992 Russian Suspension Agreement (“RSA”), as amended in 2008. These quotas limit the amount of Russian LEU that can be imported into the United States for U.S. consumption.

The U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”) is currently conducting an administrative review of the current status of, and compliance with, the RSA during the period October 2017 through September 2018 (the “Second Administrative Review”) and in December 2019, initiated another review of the period October 2018 through September 2019 (the “Third Administrative Review”). In an earlier review (the “First Administrative Review”), which covered the period October 2016 through September 2017 and was completed in December 2017, the DOC found that TENEX, Centrus and others had complied with the terms of the RSA during the period of review, but deferred until the Second Administrative Review any decision on whether the RSA continues to meet the statutory requirements that the RSA (i) prevent the suppression or undercutting of price levels of domestic uranium products and (ii) continue to be in the public interest. In a preliminary determination in the Second Administrative Review, issued in December 2019, the DOC again found that Centrus and others had complied with the RSA, but again deferred making a determination on the statutory requirements, which it said would be addressed in a post-preliminary analysis, which has yet to be issued. A final determination in the Second Administrative Review is expected to be issued in June 2020.

If, in the final determination of the Second Administrative Review, the DOC finds evidence either of non-compliance with the RSA, or that the statutory requirements are no longer being met, it could terminate the RSA, reinitiate the antidumping investigation that the RSA suspended, and begin collecting duties in excess of 115% of the value of imports of Russian uranium products, including the LEU that the Company imports under the Russian Supply Agreement.



In February 2019, the DOC formally opened negotiations with the Russian Federation State Atomic Energy Corporation (Rosatom) with respect to a possible extension of the term of the RSA. In connection with these negotiations, the DOC is seeking a significant extension of the RSA. We are working with industry stakeholders and others to ensure that the extension will include sufficient quota to allow all existing contracts with TENEX, including the Russian Supply Agreement, to be fully implemented, but it is possible that the terms of the extension will not expressly protect our ability to import LEU under the Russian Supply Agreement or require that available quota be allocated to those imports.

An extension of the RSA would continue the existing suspension of the antidumping investigation and therefore not require payment of the duties or duty deposits described above, as long as the suspension remained in place. Centrus does not currently have in place any agreement with TENEX to share quotas that may apply after 2020, when the existing quotas terminate. Unless the RSA extension provides for sufficient quota or other relief that would allow Centrus to deliver in the United States all the Russian LEU that we procure under the Russian Supply Agreement, (i) our ability to meet our commitments under our order book and to obtain new sales commitments would be substantially jeopardized, and (ii) our ability to earn revenues with the Russian LEU we are required to procure under the Russian Supply Agreement would be substantially reduced. As a result, we would lose both revenue and market share to our competitors.

Similarly, if, instead of an extension of the RSA, the DOC reached adverse final determination in the Second Administrative Review and elected to restart the antidumping investigation of Russian uranium products, including LEU, we would be obligated to deposit funds with the U.S. government to cover potential duties (and potentially pay antidumping duties on a going-forward basis if the antidumping investigation resulted in an antidumping order) that would render the LEU containing the SWU that we purchase under the Russian Supply Agreement too expensive to place into the market. Such an outcome would cause us to incur significant losses in fulfilling our existing contracts, and make it commercially challenging to win new contracts using the Russian LEU.

As a result of the uncertainty regarding the outcome the pending trade matter, customers may be reluctant to contract long-term for material from the Company and the Company may not be able to secure adequate alternative supplies. Further, the outcome of the pending trade matter could materially impact future demand and market prices. For further details, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors - Restrictions on imports or sales of LEU or SWU that we buy could adversely affect profitability and the viability of our business.


Technical Solutions


Our technical solutions segment reflects our technical, manufacturing, engineering and operations services offered to public and private sector customers, including the American Centrifuge engineering, and testing activities we have performed as a contractor for UT-Battelle and the engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and operations services being performed under the HALEU Contract. With our government and private sector customers, we seek to leverage our domestic enrichment experience, engineering know-how, and precision manufacturing facility to assist customers with a range of engineering, design, and advanced manufacturing projects, including the production of fuel for next-generation nuclear reactors and the development of related facilities.

Government Contracting

On October 31, 2019, we signed the three-year cost-share HALEU Contract with DOE to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU for advanced reactors. The program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when the Company and DOE signed an interim HALEU letter agreement that allowed work to begin while the full contract was being finalized.



Under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million. The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs incurred above these amounts. As described in Overview above, the portion of our anticipated cost share under the HALEU Contract representing our share of remaining projected program costs was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million as of December 31, 2019. The accrued loss on the contract will be adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results and remaining program cost projections.The HALEU Contract is incrementally funded and DOE is currently obligated for costs up to approximately $53.2 million of the $115 million. The Company received cash payments of $10.7 million through December 31, 2019.

Costs under the HALEU Contract include program costs, including direct labor and materials and associated indirect costs that are classified as Cost of Sales, and an allocation of corporate costs supporting the program that are classified as Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Services to be provided over the three-year contract include constructing and assembling centrifuge machines and related infrastructure in a cascade formation. When estimates of total program costs to be incurred for such an integrated, construction-type contract exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is recorded to Cost of Sales in the period the loss is determined, and is reflected in Current Liabilities. Provisions for contract losses are reviewed regularly based on actual results and remaining cost projections. Our corporate costs supporting the program are recognized as expense as incurred over the duration of the contract term.

Effective June 1, 2019 with the commencement of the HALEU work, ongoing costs of the Piketon facility that are included in Advanced Technology Costs on the consolidated statement of operations prior to June 1, 2019, are included in Cost of Sales of the technical solutions segment.

Over the past five years, our government contracts with UT-Battelle have provided for engineering and testing work on the American Centrifuge technology at our facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Our completed fixed-price contract with UT-Battelle for the period from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, generated revenue of approximately $16.0 million upon completion of defined milestones. Although the contract expired September 30, 2018, we continued to perform work towards the expected milestones as the parties worked toward a successor agreement. Costs for work performed in the first quarter of 2019 were classified as Cost of Sales. As the scope of work became viewed as more limited than originally anticipated, costs for work performed in the second quarter and most of the third quarter of 2019 were classified as Advanced Technology Costs. A successor fixed-price agreement was entered into with UT-Battelle in September 2019 and was completed in 2019 resulting in revenue of $1.2 million. In February 2020, an additional $4.4 million fixed-price agreement was entered into with UT-Battelle with a milestone deliverable in the second quarter of 2020.

We continue to invest in advanced technology because of the potential for future growth into new areas of business for the Company, while also preserving our unique workforce at our Technology and Manufacturing Center in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Tennessee, and our production facility near Piketon, Ohio.


Government Contracting

On September 27, 2018,October 31, 2019, we leveraged our D&D experience and entered into an agreementsigned the cost-share HALEU Contract with DOE to decontaminatedeploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU for advanced reactors. The three-year program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when the Company and decommissionDOE signed an interim HALEU letter agreement that allowed work to begin while the K-1600 facility located atfull contract was being finalized. The Company entered into this cost-share contract with DOE as a critical first step on the East Tennessee Technology Park. Underroad back to the termscommercial production of enriched uranium, which the Company had terminated in 2013 with the closure of the agreement, pursuantPaducah GDP. The HALEU Contract, if fully implemented, is expected to result in the Company having constructed the AC100M technology and prepared the systems to enrich uranium to the 20% concentration in the uranium-235 isotope that is required by many of the advanced reactor concepts now under development. Centrus is the only company with an NRC license to enrich HALEU.

In 2019, under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million which was increased to $126.7 million. In addition, on March 4, 2022, the DOE informed the Company of their intent to fund an additional $9.0 million above the $126.7 million, as disclosed above. The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs the Company elects to incur above these amounts. Costs under the HALEU Contract include program costs, including internal labor, third-party services and materials and associated indirect costs that are classified as Cost of Sales, and an allocation of corporate costs supporting the program that are classified as Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Services to be provided over the three-year contract include constructing and assembling centrifuge machines and related infrastructure in a cascade formation. When estimates of total costs for such an integrated, construction-type contract exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the remaining loss on the contract is recorded to Cost of Sales in the period the loss is determined. Our corporate costs supporting the program are recognized as expense as incurred over the duration of the contract term. The accrued loss on the contract is being adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results, remaining program cost projections, and the Company’s anticipated cost-share. The impact to Cost of Sales for the year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, is $7.2 million and $10.6 million, respectively, for previously accrued contract losses attributable to work authorizationperformed in the periods. As of December 31, 2021, a total of $19.1 million of previously accrued contract losses have been realized and the accrued contract loss balance included in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities is $0.5 million.

45


Our HALEU Contract expires June 1, 2022, and although we believe demand for HALEU will emerge over the next several years thereafter, there are no guarantees that we will be awarded a contract to operate the demonstration facility plant or about whether or when government or commercial demand for HALEU will materialize, and there are a number of technical, regulatory, and economic hurdles that must be overcome for these fuels and reactors to come to the market.

The U.S. government has been operating under a series of Continuing Resolutions in Fiscal Year 2022. The DOE continues to support the HALEU program during the continuing resolution period, and has incrementally increased the government’s cost share ceiling as funds have become available. Currently, DOE has provided incremental funding, and increased the government’s cost share ceiling to $126.7 million.

While the existing contract ends on June 1, 2022, the DOE has unilaterally changed the scope of the existing contract and plans to compete the operational portion of the demonstration in a new, competitively-awarded contract, with operations to begin in mid-2022. Centrus believes it is well-positioned to compete for a follow-on contract to operate the machines in Piketon but there is no assurance that DOE will award such a contract to the Company. Congress has not yet adopted a Fiscal Year 2022 appropriations bill for the Department, and there is no assurance that the proposed program, which would go beyond the scope and expiration of our lease withexisting contract, will be approved and funded.

Additional COVID-19-related impacts, delays in DOE we werefurnishing equipment, or changes to the existing scope of the HALEU Contract could result in further material increases to our estimate of the costs required to removecomplete the demonstration cascade and dispose of government owned materials and equipment in order to render the facility radiologically uncontaminated and unclassified. The contract was a cost-plus fixed fee contract totaling approximately $15 million. The Company announced that it had successfully completed D&D of the facility on October 9, 2019. In connection with the substantialproduce HALEU, as well as delay completion of the HALEU Contract. The Company does not currently have a contractual obligation to perform work we terminated our lease within excess of the funding provided by DOE forand, therefore, no additional costs have been accrued as of December 31, 2021. If the K-1600 facility on September 30, 2019.

In addition, we have entered into other contracts with DOE other agencies and their contractorselects not to provide engineering, designfunding for production and manufacturing services.the Company nonetheless commits to a plan to complete the demonstration cascade and produce HALEU, we may incur material additional costs or losses in future periods that could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and liquidity.



Commercial Contracting


In March 2018, we entered into aan initial services agreement with X Energy, LLC (“X-energy”)X-energy to provide X-energy with technical and resource support for criticality safety evaluation of processing equipment,conceptual design of freshits TRISO fuel transport packages, and conceptual mock-up of a nuclear fuel production facility.manufacturing process. In November 2018, we entered into a second services agreement with X-energy to provide technical and resource support toproceed with preliminary design of the design and license application development of its nuclear fuel productionTRISO facility. Under both agreements, which were funded by two separate cooperative agreement awards by DOE, we provideprovided X-energy with non-cash in-kind contributions subjectpursuant to a cooperative agreement between X-energy and the United States government.X-energy’s obligations under those agreements. Both of these contracts have been completed. In November 2019,2020, the parties extended the period of performance through June 30, 2020.August 2021. In August 2021, we entered into a new services agreement with X-energy to provide design services for detailed design of the TRISO fuel manufacturing facility and various support services for establishing their TRISO Research and Development Center. X-energy is funded under the current DOE cooperative agreement titled Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP). The task orders under the new agreement may include in-kind contributions that we are not currently, but may provide, at our discretion.


Under the X-energy agreements, Centrus performs services are performed pursuant to separate task orders issued andthat provide for time-and-materials based pricing. The cumulative value of task orders issued callsthrough December 31, 2021 under the three agreements provided for payments to us of $11.9 million and in-kind contributions to be provided by us of $6.5 million. Revenue in 2018-2019 for payments received or pending totaled $9.5$26.3 million and in-kind contributions provided by us totaled $5.0of $10.4 million.

In addition, we have entered into other contracts for the engineering, design, and advanced manufacturing services with other commercial entities.


Prior Site Services Work


We formerly performed sites services work under contracts with DOE and its contractors at the former Portsmouth (Ohio) and Paducah (Kentucky) Gaseous Diffusion Plants.GDP. In January 2018, we entered into a settlement agreement with DOE andSeptember 2021, the U.S. government regarding breach of contract claims brought by the Company relating to this work. In connection with the settlement, the Company (a) received $4.7 million from the U.S. government, (b) applied approximately $19.3 million of advances from the U.S. government received in prior years against the receivables balance, and (c) recorded additional revenue of $9.5 million in the first quarter of 2018.

The Company and DOE have yet to fully settlesettled the Company’s claims for reimbursements forreimbursement of certain pension and postretirement benefitsbenefit costs related toincurred in connection with a past cost-
46


reimbursable contract for work performed at the Portsmouth and Paducah plant sites. There isGDP. Under the potential for additional income to be recognized for this work pendingterms of the outcomesettlement agreement, DOE paid the Company $43.5 million in September 2021, of legal proceedings relatedwhich $33.8 million was contributed in September 2021 to the Company’s claimspension plan for its subsidiary United States Enrichment Corp. (“Enrichment Corp.”) and $9.7 million was deposited in October 2021 in a trust for payment and the potential release of previously established valuation allowances on receivables. Refer to Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings, for additional information.

2020 Outlook

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel strainpostretirement health benefits payable by Enrichment Corp. The payment of coronavirus (COVID-19) a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. The Company$43.5 million is taking actions to protect its workforce and maintain critical operations. Travel, operational and other restrictions imposed by the U.S. and foreign governments may impact our ability to make future sales and may impact the ability of our suppliers, including our suppliers of low enriched uranium, to perform their contracts. Asincluded in revenue of the date of this filing, our LEUtechnical solutions segment operations have not been affected and we are working with our suppliers, fabricators and customers to monitorfor the situation closely.year ended December 31, 2021.

Further, on March 22, 2020, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine issued a “Stay at Home” order (the “Ohio Order”) effective at 11:59 pm on March 23, 2020. The Order prohibits holding gatherings of any size and closes all nonessential Ohio businesses. Other states and counties, including Maryland, have issued similar versions of the stay at home order and we expect other states and counties to do so in the coming days. As a result, the Company has instituted measures such as expanded telework to protect our workforce, to comply with government orders, and to maintain critical operations. Not all work, however, can be performed remotely. Consequently, we have instituted limited operations for personnel working on the HALEU program at Piketon, Ohio, to maintain critical systems and security. Further, the actions taken by government regulatory agencies to protect their workforce may impact our ability to obtain the necessary reviews and approvals to complete the project. At this time, other than the restrictions


on a limited number of our employees at the Piketon, Ohio facility, our Technical Solutions segment operations, has not been significantly affected. We are working closely with the Department of Energy and we are continuing to work to make progress while implementing measures to protect our workforce.

Since we cannot reasonably estimate the length or severity of this pandemic, or the extent to which the disruption may materially impact our consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated cash flows in fiscal 2020, we are not providing guidance on the Company’s financial results for 2020 at this time.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of our consolidated financial statements, which were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business are complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments that are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. Critical accounting estimates are those that require management to make assumptions about matters that are uncertain at the time the estimate is made and for which different estimates, often based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, but are inherently uncertain and unpredictable, could have a material impact on our operating results and financial condition. It is also possible that other professionals, applying their own judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a range of alternative estimated amounts. We are also subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from estimated amounts, such as the healthcare environment, legislation and regulation. Additionally, changes in accounting rules or their interpretation could significantly affect our results of operations and financial condition.


The sensitivity analyses used below are not intended to provide a reader with our predictions of the variability of the estimates used. Rather, the sensitivities used are included to allow the reader to understand a general cause and effect of changes in estimates.


We have identified the following to be our critical accounting estimates:


Revenue Recognition - Technical Solutions


Revenue for the technical solutions segment principally representing technical, manufacturing, engineering, procurement, construction and operations services offered to public and private sector customers, is recognized over the contractual period as services are rendered. The Company recognizes revenue over time as it performs on these contracts because of the continuous transfer of control to the customer. For public sector contracts, this continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the contract that allow the customer to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience, pay the Company for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit, and assume control of any work in progress. The Company’s private sector contracts generally contain contractual termination clauses or entitle the Company to paymentspayment for work performed to date for goods and services that do not have an alternative use. With control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. A contract may contain one or more performance obligations. Two or more promises to transfer goods or services to a customer may be considered a single performance obligation if the goods or services are highly interdependent or highly interrelated such that utility of the promised goods or services to the customer includes integration services provided by the Company.


The Company determines the transaction price for each contract based on the consideration it expects to receive for the products or services being provided under the contract. If transaction prices are not stated in the contract for each performance obligation, contractual prices are allocated to performance obligations based on estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised services.


The Company generally uses the cost-to-cost input method of progress for performance obligations to deliver products with continual transfer of control to the customer, because it best depicts the transfer of control to the


customer that occurs as the Company incurs costs. Under the cost-to-cost method, the extent of
47


progress towards completion is measured based on the proportion of direct costs incurred to date to the total estimated direct costs at completion of the performance obligation. Revenues are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. For performance obligations to provide services to the customer, revenue is recognized over time based on direct costs incurred or the right to invoice method (in situations where the value transferred matches the Company’s billing rights) as the customer receives and consumes the benefits.


Use of the cost-to-cost method requires the Company to make reasonably dependable estimates regarding the revenue andof costs at completion associated with the design, manufacture and delivery of products and services.services in order to calculate revenue. Significant judgment is used to estimate total revenue and costs at completion.completion, particularly in the assumptions related to internal labor hours and third-party services for which a vendor invoice or quote is not yet available. As a significant change in one or more estimates could affect the profitability of the Company’s contracts, the Company reviews and updates its contract-related estimates regularly. Adjustments in estimated profits/losses are recognized under the cumulative catch-up method. Under this method, the impact of the adjustments is recognized in the period the adjustment is recognized. When estimates of total costs to be incurredat completion for an integrated, construction type contract exceed total estimates of revenue to be earned on a performance obligation related to complex equipment or related services, a provision for the entireremaining loss on the performance obligation is recognized in the period the loss is identified.determined.


Asset Valuations


The accounting for SWU and uranium inventories includes estimates and judgments. SWU and uranium inventory costs are determined using the average cost method. Inventories of SWU and uranium are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The estimated selling price for SWU and uranium under contract is based on the pricing terms of contracts in our sales order book, and, forbook. For uranium not under contract, the estimated selling price is based primarily on published price indicators at the balance sheet date.


Intangible assets originated from our reorganization and application of fresh start accounting as of September 30, 2014. The intangible assets represented the fair value adjustment to the assets and liabilities for our LEU segment. The identifiable intangible assets relate to our order book and customer relationships. The order book intangible asset is amortized as the order book valued at emergence is reduced, principally as a result of deliveries to customers. The customer relationships intangible asset is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated average useful life of 15 years, with 97 ¾ years of scheduled amortization remaining. The aggregate net balance of identifiable intangible assets was $69.5$54.7 million as of December 31, 2019.2021.


The carrying values of the intangible assets are subject to impairment tests whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be fully recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset, or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Inherent in our fair value determinations are certain judgments and estimates, including projections of future cash flows, the discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and strategic plans with regard to operations. A change in these underlying assumptions would cause a change in the results of the tests, which could cause the fair value of the intangible asset to be less than its respective carrying amount.


48



Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Benefit Costs and Obligations


We provide retirement benefits to certain employees and retirees under defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health and life benefit plans. The valuation of benefit obligations and costs is based on provisions of the plans and actuarial assumptions that involve judgments and estimates.




Assets and obligations related to our retiree benefit plans are remeasured each year as of the balance sheet date resulting in differences between actual and projected results for the year. The Company has elected the accounting option to recognize these actuarial gains and losses in the statement of operations in the fourth quarter. The alternative would be to amortize gains and losses into operating results over time. The Company’s treatment of recognizing actuarial gains and losses immediately is intended to increase transparency into how movements in plan assets and benefit obligations impact financial results. Immediate recognition of such gains and losses in the statement of operations may cause significant fluctuations in our results of operations. In addition, an interim remeasurement and recognition of gains or losses may be required for a plan during the year if lump sum payments exceed certain levels.


Effective January 1, 2018, a new accounting standard required componentsComponents of retirement benefit expense/income other than service cost to be presented below the subtotal for operating income (loss), and are presented in our consolidated statement of operations as Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income)Income. These components consist primarily of the return on plan assets, offset by interest cost as the discounted present value of benefit obligations nears payment. Results also reflect claims experience, changes in mortality and healthcare claim assumptions and changes in market interest rates. Service cost continues to beis recognized in Cost of Sales for (for the LEU segmentsegment) and to Selling, General and Administrative expense.


We recognized $4.0 millionNonoperating components of net actuarial gainsperiodic benefit income netted to income of $67.6 million in 2019 compared to2021 and $1.6 million in 2020, including a net actuarial lossesgain of $17.3$50.5 million in 2018 related2021 and net actuarial loss of $7.2 million in 2020. In 2021, the net actuarial gain reflected an increase in interest rates from approximately 2.5% to our retiree benefit plans. The2.8%, favorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, and healthcare claims assumption, partially offset by changes in mortality, healthcare costs trend assumptions, and claims experience. In 2020, the net gainactuarial loss reflected a decline in 2019 reflectsmarket interest rates from approximately 3.3% to 2.5%, partially offset by favorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, changes in mortality and healthcare claim assumptions, and favorable claims experience, partially offset by declines in market interest rates. In 2018, the net loss reflects unfavorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, partially offset by increases in market interest rates, changes in mortality and healthcare claim assumptions, and favorable claims experience.assumptions.


Changes in actuarial assumptions could impact the measurement of benefit obligations and benefit costs, as follows:
The expected return on benefit plan assets is approximately 6.5%5.50% for 2020.2022. The expected return is based on historical returns and expectations of future returns for the composition of the plans’ equity and debt securities. A one-half percentage point decrease in the expected return on plan assets would increase annual pension costs by $3.0$3.2 million in 2020.2022. However, the net impact of any changes in the expected return on benefit plan assets on the final benefit cost recognized for fiscal year 20202022 would be $0 since the actual return on assets would effectively be reflected at December 31, 2020,2022, under our mark-to-market accounting methodology.
The present value of pension obligations is calculated by discounting long-term obligations using a market interest rate. This discount rate is the estimated rate at which the benefit obligations could be effectively settled on the measurement date and is based on yields of high quality fixed income investments whose cash flows match the timing and amount of expected benefit payments of the plan. Discount rates of approximately 3.3%2.8% were used as of December 31, 2019.2021. A one-half percentage point reduction in the discount rate would increase the valuation of pension benefit obligations by $39.9$35.5 million and postretirement health and life benefit obligations by $7.7$6.9 million, and the resulting changes in the valuations would decrease the aggregate service cost and interest cost components of annual pension costs and postretirement health and life benefit costs by $2.5$2.6 million and $0.5$0.4 million, respectively.
49


The healthcare costs trend rates are 6.0%6% projected in 20202022 reducing to a final trend rate of 5% by 2022.2026. The healthcare costs trend rate represents our estimate of the annual rate of increase in the gross cost of providing benefits. The trend rate is a reflection of health care inflation assumptions, changes in healthcare utilization and delivery patterns, technological advances, and changes in the health status of our plan participants. A one-percentage point increase in the healthcare cost trend rates would increase postretirement health benefit obligations by about $3.5 million and would increase the service cost and interest cost components of annual benefit costs by about $0.1 million.



In December 2012, we invoiced DOE for $42.8 million, representing its share of pension and postretirement benefits costs related to the transition of Portsmouth site employees to DOE’s D&D contractor, as permitted by CAS and based on CAS calculation methodology. DOE has denied our claim. As a result, the Company filed an appeal of the decision in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in January 2015. There is no assurance we will be successful in our appeal, and we have not recognized income or a receivable due to uncertainty regarding the amounts owed and the timing of collection. The parties are engaged in settlement discussions, and further action on the case is stayed pending the outcome of such discussions. Refer to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for additional information.


Income Taxes


During the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As a result, we recognize tax liabilities based on estimates of whether additional taxes and interest will be due. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made.


Accounting standards prescribe a minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before the related tax benefit may be recognized in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, included in Other Long-Term Liabilities, on the consolidated balance sheet in Part IV of this Annual Report was $0.4$1.0 million and accrued interest and penalties totaled less than $0.1 million.


Accounting for income taxes involves estimates and judgments relating to the tax bases of assets and liabilities and the future recoverability of deferred tax assets. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, we determine whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in future years when deferred tax assets are recoverable or are expected to reverse. Factors that may affect estimates of future taxable income include, but are not limited to, competition, changes in revenue, costs or profit margins, market share, and developments related to the American Centrifuge technology. In practice, positive and negative evidence is reviewed with objective evidence receiving greater weight. If, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, we record a valuation allowance. The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is necessary and the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed for all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets. A cumulative loss in recent years is a significant piece of

All available positive and negative evidence and one of the most difficult forms of negative evidenceis analyzed quarterly to overcome. We have incurred cumulative operating losses since 2011.

Our inability to overcome the strong negative objective evidence of a cumulative loss in recent years with sufficient objective positive evidence of future taxable income to realize our deferred tax assets required us to record a valuation allowance. To determine the amount of the valuation allowance, all sources of taxable income, including tax planning strategies, were analyzed. We determined that it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will not be realized in the immediate future.allowance. A full valuation allowance against the federal and state net deferred assets was first recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 forbecause of significant losses and other negative evidence.

In the net deferred tax asset created bysecond quarter of 2020, the expensing of previously capitalized costs related to a number of earlier centrifuge machines used invaluation allowance on the demonstration cascade test program, as well as all other previously recordedstate net deferred tax assets for the LEU segment was released due to a return to profitability that led to cumulative income for state income tax purposes. A full valuation allowance against the federal and state net deferred tax assets for the rest of the business remained throughout 2020 because negative evidence, including statecumulative losses, outweighed positive evidence.

Centrus evaluated both positive and negative evidence that was objectively verifiable to determine the amount of the federal valuation allowance that is required on Centrus’ federal deferred taxes.tax assets. As discussed in Operating Results, Centrus has visibility on a significant portion of revenue in the LEU segment through 2026, primarily from its long-term sales contracts. Centrus considered both its achievement ofsustained profitability and cumulative income in 2021, as well as the forecasted income to be significant forms of positive evidence. Negative evidence included uncertainty in and the lack of objectively verifiable evidence for profitability in later years when Centrus’ existing sales order book and supply contracts reach expiration in its LEU segment. In Centrus’ technical solutions segment, negative evidence included uncertainty in the future funding of the HALEU enrichment facility and thus, no assumptions for the future funding of the HALEU enrichment facility were included in the forecast model because it was not objectively verifiable. Centrus
50


determined that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence and supported a release of the federal valuation allowance. However, due to lack of objectively verifiable information in later years, it was determined that forecasted future income was not sufficient to realize all the deferred tax assets. Therefore, the Company recorded a $40.7 million partial release of its federal valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of 2021. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the valuation allowance against the remaining federal and state net deferred taxestax assets was $459.5$414.7 million.


TheGoing forward, the Company will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence that would support any further changes to the remaining valuation allowance resultsallowances. Such evidence in its technical solutions segment may include signing new contracts which could have a significant impact on pre-tax income, follow-on work related to the HALEU program, or abandonment of the commercial deployment of the centrifuge technology. Refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors for more information. Such evidence in our inabilityLEU segment may include renewing SWU sales contracts with existing customers and/or signing new SWU sales or purchase contracts with significantly higher or lower margins than currently forecasted. Additional evidence in the LEU segment may include potential deferrals in the timing of deliveries requested by its customers, which would impact revenue recognition timing. The impact of these and other potential positive and negative events will be weighed and evaluated to record tax benefits on future losses until we generate sufficient taxable income to support the elimination of the valuation allowance. However,determine if the valuation allowance will not affectshould be increased or decreased in the future.
51


Results of Operations

A discussion of the results of operations from 2019 can be found in Item 7, Management Discussion and Analysis, of the Company’s ability to use its deferred tax assets when it generates taxable income. In connectionAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the 2014 bankruptcy plan, tax attributes, such as net operating losses (“NOLs”), tax credits, and tax basis in property have been reduced. When tax attributes are reduced, deferred taxes related to the tax attributes and the corresponding valuation allowance are adjusted. Management reassesses the realization of the deferred tax assets each reporting period. As financial results improve and the deferred tax assets become realizable, we will reduce the valuation allowance accordingly.

SEC on March 22, 2021.

Results of Operations


Segment Information


The following table presents elements of the accompanying consolidated statements of operations that are categorized by segment (dollar amounts in millions):
Year Ended 
December 31,
 20212020$ Change% Change
LEU segment  
Revenue:  
SWU revenue$163.3 $151.5 $11.8 %
Uranium revenue22.8 39.0 (16.2)(42)%
Total186.1 190.5 (4.4)(2)%
Cost of sales113.1 92.7 (20.4)(22)%
Gross profit$73.0 $97.8 $(24.8)
Technical solutions segment  
Revenue$112.2 $56.7 $55.5 98 %
Cost of sales70.7 56.9 (13.8)(24)%
Gross profit (loss)$41.5 $(0.2)$41.7 
Total  
Revenue$298.3 $247.2 $51.1 21 %
Cost of sales183.8 149.6 (34.2)(23)%
Gross profit$114.5 $97.6 $16.9 
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
    
 2019 2018 $ Change % Change
LEU segment       
Revenue:       
SWU revenue$123.7
 $130.6
 $(6.9) (5)%
Uranium revenue45.7
 33.8
 11.9
 35 %
Total169.4
 164.4
 5.0
 3 %
Cost of sales118.6
 187.7
 69.1
 37 %
Gross profit (loss)$50.8
 $(23.3) $74.1
  
        
Technical solutions segment     
  
Revenue$40.3
 $28.6
 $11.7
 41 %
Cost of sales58.6
 23.2
 (35.4) (153)%
Gross profit (loss)$(18.3) $5.4
 $(23.7)  
        
Total     
  
Revenue$209.7
 $193.0
 $16.7
 9 %
Cost of sales177.2
 210.9
 33.7
 16 %
Gross profit (loss)$32.5
 $(17.9) $50.4
  


Revenue


Revenue from the LEU segment increased $5.0decreased $4.4 million (or 3%or (2%) in 20192021 compared to 2018.2020. SWU revenue declined $6.9increased $11.8 million (or 5%)or 8% in 20192021 compared to 2018.2020. The volume of SWU sales declined 24% andincreased 64%. SWU revenue in 2020 includes $32.6 million collected from a customer in settlement of a supply contract that was subject to the customer’s bankruptcy proceeding. Excluding this payment, the average SWU price billed to customers increased 24%decreased 16%, reflecting the particular contracts under which SWU were sold during the periods. Uranium revenue increased $11.9decreased $16.2 million (or 35%or (42%) in 20192021 compared to 2018.2020. The volume of uranium sales increased 29% and the average uranium price billed to customers increased 5%decreased (46%).


Revenue from the technical solutions segment increased $11.7$55.5 million (or 41%)or 98% in 20192021 compared to 2018, primarily2020. Revenue in 2021 included $43.5 million related to the resultsettlement of the Company’s claims for reimbursements for certain pension and postretirement benefits costs incurred in connection with a past cost-reimbursable contract performed at the Portsmouth GDP. Excluding this payment, revenue from the technical solutions segment increased $12.0 million or 21% in 2021, due to increased work performed under the HALEU contract and the K-1600 D&D contract, partially offset by a decrease in work performed under the UT-Battelle contract. Revenue in 2018 included $9.5 million related to the January 2018 settlement with DOE related to past work performed.other contracts.


Cost of Sales


Cost of sales for the LEU segment declined $69.1increased $20.4 million (or 37%)or 22% in 20192021 compared to 2018, primarily2020, reflecting a declinethe increase in SWU sales volume, partially offset by the decrease in uranium sales volume. The average cost of sales
52


per SWU and the changes in SWU and uranium sales volumes. In 2019, the average cost of sales per SWU declined 38%, primarily due to lower pricing under the Russian Supply Agreement.was unchanged from 2020. Cost of sales includes legacy costs related to former employees of the Portsmouth GDP and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion PlantsGDP of $4.1$2.7 million in 20192021 and $3.4$3.7 million in 2018. Valuation adjustments for our uranium inventory to reflect declines in uranium market price indicators totaled $2.3 million in 2019 and there were no valuation adjustments in 2018. The average uranium unit cost of sales increased 17% in 2019 compared to 2018.2020.




Cost of sales for the technical solutions segment increased $35.4$13.8 million (or 153%)or 24% in 20192021 compared to 2018,2020, largely reflecting the mixincrease in contract work performed. The impact to cost of technical solutionssales is $7.2 million in 2021 and $10.6 million in 2020 for previously accrued contract losses attributable to work performed in each of the periods. As of December 31, 2019, our share of remaining projected program costs under the HALEU Contract. For details on HALEU Contract was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million. The accrued loss on the contract will be adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results and remaining program cost projections.accounting, refer to Technical Solutions - Government Contracting above.


Gross Profit (Loss)


We recognized a gross profit of $32.5$114.5 million in 2019,2021, an increaseimprovement of $50.4$16.9 million compared to the gross lossprofit of $17.9$97.6 million in 2018.2020.


The gross profit for the LEU segment was $50.8$73.0 million in 20192021 compared to a gross loss of $23.3$97.8 million in 2018.2020. The improvementdecrease for the LEU segment of $74.1$24.8 million was primarily due to the declinepayment of $32.6 million in 2020 from a customer in settlement of a supply contract that was subject to the average cost of sales per SWUcustomer’s bankruptcy proceeding and the increasedecrease in the average SWU price billed to customers, partially offset by the decline in SWU volume sold. The gross profit from uranium sales in 2019 was relatively minor, with the impact of the increase in uranium volume sold and the increase in the average unit sales price, largelypartially offset by the increase in the averageSWU and uranium unit cost of sales.sales volumes.


For the technical solutions segment, we recognized a gross lossprofit of $18.3$41.5 million in 2019,2021 compared to gross profit of $5.4 million in 2018. The gross profit for 2019 was break even excluding the accrued contract loss of $18.3 million related to projected costs for the HALEU program. In 2018, there was a gross loss of $4.1$0.2 million excludingin 2020. Excluding the $9.5 million of revenue in the January 2018 settlement with DOE, relatedgross profit (loss) from the technical solutions segment increased to past work performed.a loss of $2.0 million in 2021 from a loss of $0.2 million in 2020.


Non-Segment Information


The following table presents elements of the accompanying consolidated statements of operations that are not categorized by segment (dollar amounts in millions):
Year Ended 
December 31,
 20212020$ Change% Change
Gross profit$114.5 $97.6 $16.9 17 %
Advanced technology costs2.1 2.8 0.7 25 %
Selling, general and administrative36.0 36.0 — — %
Amortization of intangible assets8.1 6.8 (1.3)(19)%
Special charges for workforce reductions— 0.6 0.6 100 %
Other expense, net— 0.4 0.4 100 %
Operating income68.3 51.0 17.3 34 %
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit income(67.6)(1.6)66.0 4,125 %
Interest expense0.1 0.1 — — %
Investment income(0.1)(0.5)(0.4)(80)%
Income before income taxes135.9 53.0 82.9 156 %
Income tax benefit(39.1)(1.4)37.7 -
Net income$175.0 $54.4 $120.6 222 %

53


 Year Ended 
 December 31,
    
 2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Gross profit (loss)$32.5
 (17.9) $50.4
 282 %
Advanced technology costs14.6
 26.1
 11.5
 44 %
Selling, general and administrative33.7
 39.9
 6.2
 16 %
Amortization of intangible assets6.5
 6.6
 0.1
 2 %
Special charges (credits) for workforce reductions and advisory costs(1.9) 2.2
 4.1
 186 %
Gain on sales of assets(0.7) (0.3) 0.4
 133 %
Operating loss(19.7) (92.4) 72.7
 79 %
Gain on early extinguishment of debt
 (0.5) (0.5) (100)%
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)(4.3) 10.6
 14.9
 141 %
Interest expense3.0
 4.1
 1.1
 27 %
Investment income(2.2) (2.5) (0.3) (12)%
Loss before income taxes(16.2) (104.1) 87.9
 84 %
Income tax expense0.3
 
 (0.3) -
Net loss(16.5) (104.1) 87.6
 84 %
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative7.8
 7.8
 
  %
Net loss allocable to common stockholders$(24.3) $(111.9) $87.6
 78 %




Advanced Technology Costs


Advanced technology costs consist of American Centrifuge and related expenses that are outside of our customer contracts in the technical solutions segment. Costs declined $11.5 million (or 44%) in 2019 comparedsegment, including costs for work at the Piketon facility prior to 2018, primarily due to a reduction in our license and facility caretaker costs at Piketon following the commencement of work under the HALEU contractwork in June 2019.2020 and costs to continue to advance our advanced technology. Costs declined $0.7 million (or 25%) in 2021 compared to 2020.


Selling, General and Administrative


Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses declined $6.2 million (or 16%) in 2019 compared to 2018. Compensation and benefits declined $4.0 million, information technology costs declined $0.8 million, consulting expenses declined $0.4 million, travel costs declined $0.4were $36.0 million in 2019,each of 2021 and other costs declined by a net $0.6 million.2020. These expenses remained flat year over year.


Amortization of Intangible Assets


Amortization of intangible assets declined $0.1increased $1.3 million (or 2%)or 19% in 20192021 compared to 2018.2020. Amortization expense for the intangible asset related to the September 2014 sales order book is a function of SWU sales volume under that order book, and amortization expense for the intangible asset related to customer relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis.


Special Charges (Credits) for Workforce Reductions and Advisory Costs


There were no special charges in 2021. Special charges declined $4.1of $0.6 million (or 186%) in 2019, compared to 2018. Special charges in 2019 included a credit of $2.9 million for the reversal of accrued termination benefits for employees who were retained with the signing of the HALEU letter agreement in May 2019. Special charges in 20182020 consisted of estimated employee termination benefits of $2.1 million and advisory costs related to updating the Company’s information technology systems of $0.1$0.6 million.

Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt

In 2018, we recognized a gain of $0.5 million related to the exchange of securities and cash on December 6, 2018 related to the early extinguishment of $6.3 million of Company’s 8% paid-in-kind (“PIK”) toggle notes (the “8% PIK Toggle Notes) due in 2019.


Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income)Income


Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income) netted to income of $4.3was ($67.6) million in 2019,2021, compared to expense of $10.6($1.6) million in 2018.2020. Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income) consistincome in 2021 consists primarily of the expecteda return on plan assets of ($58.2) million and future impacts of the change in the discount rate of ($31.0) million, offset by interest cost of $21.5 million, as the discounted present value of benefit obligations nears payment.

In 2019, Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit income in 2020 consists primarily of a return on plan assets of ($85.8) million offset by future impacts of the net gain reflects favorable investment returns relative tochange in the expected return assumption, changes indiscount rate of $74.0 million, interest cost of $29.1 million, as the discounted present value of benefit obligations nears payment, and other actuarial items, which includes mortality and healthcare claim assumptions and favorable claims experience, partially offset by declines in market interest rates.which net to ($18.9) million.

In 2018, major U.S. stock indices posted their largest annual losses since 2008. The net expense in 2018 reflected unfavorable investment returns relative to the expected return assumption, partially offset by increases in market interest rates, changes in mortality and healthcare claim assumptions, and favorable claims experience.



Interest Expense


Interest expense declined $1.1was $0.1 million (or 27%) in 2019, compared to 2018, primarily as a result of the repayment the outstanding 8% PIK Toggle Notes that matured on September 30, 2019.2021 and 2020.


Income Tax Expense (Benefit)Benefit


The income tax expense was $0.3 million in 2019 and the income tax benefit was less than $0.1$39.1 million in 2018.2021 and $1.4 million in 2020. The income tax benefit in 2021 relates to the release of the federal valuation allowance of $40.7 million offset by the effect of state rate changes of $1.2 million and state income tax expense of $0.4 million. The income tax benefit in 2020 relates to the release of the state valuation allowance against state net deferred tax assets for the LEU segment of $2.0 million offset primarily by state income tax expense of $0.6 million. The state income tax expense in 20192021 and 2020, primarily relates to an accrual for a current unrecognized tax benefit offset by the reversal of a previously accrued unrecognized tax benefit. The income tax benefit in 2018 primarily relates to a reversal like the one in 2019.


54


Net LossIncome


Our net lossNet income was $16.5$175.0 million in 2019,2021, compared to a net loss of $104.1$54.4 million in 2018.2020. The favorable variance of $87.6$120.6 million was primarily a result of a $50.4 million favorable variance in gross profit, a $14.9$66.0 million favorable variance in nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense,income, $16.9 million favorable variance in gross profit and $37.7 million favorable variance in income tax benefit.

Net Income per Share

The Company measures Net Income per Share both on a $11.5 million decline in advanced technology costs, a $6.2 million decline in selling, generalU.S. GAAP basis and administrative expenses, and a $4.1 million decline in special charges.adjusted to exclude deemed dividends allocable to retired preferred stock shares (“Adjusted Net Income per Share”).


On November 17, 2020, the Company completed the purchase of 62,854 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock Dividends - Undeclaredat a price per share of $954.59, less any applicable withholding taxes. (Refer below to Liquidity and CumulativeCapital Resources for additional details.) The purchase price per share represented a 25% discount from the aggregate liquidation preference, including accrued but unpaid dividends, of $1,272.78 per share as of September 30, 2020. Since origination, the carrying value on the Balance Sheet was $43.80 per share based on values assigned in the originating securities exchange. The liquidation amount at origination was $1,000.00 per share.


HoldersThe aggregate purchase price of approximately $60 million, less accrued but unpaid dividends attributable to the purchased and retired Series B Senior Preferred Stock, is considered for purposes of Net Income per Share to be a deemed dividend to the extent it exceeds the carrying value on the Balance Sheet, or $41.9 million.

On February 2, 2021, the Company completed the exchange of 3,873 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Preferred Stock”) for (i) 231,276 shares of Class A Common Stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $21.62 per share, for an aggregate valuation of approximately $7.5 million. The carrying value of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock are entitled to cumulative dividends of 7.5%on the Balance Sheet was $1.00 per annum of theshare par value. The aggregate liquidation preference at origination of $104.6 million. We did not meet the criteria for a dividend payment obligation for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and we have not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Senior Preferred Stock, since issuanceincluding accrued but unpaid dividends, was $1,291.04 per share as of December 31, 2020.

On November 23, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of 36,867 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $1,145.20, less any applicable withholding taxes. The Company also completed the purchase of the remaining 980 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $1,149.99, less any applicable withholding taxes, on February 14, 2017. Dividends onDecember 15, 2021. For more information refer to Note 15 - Stockholders’ Equity in the consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report. The aggregate purchase price of both transactions was $43.3 million. The carrying value of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock are cumulativeon the Balance Sheet was $1.00 per share par value.

The aggregate valuation of all 2021 preferred stock transactions of approximately $50.8 million, less accrued but unpaid dividends attributable to the extent not paid at any quarter-end, whether or not declaredacquired and whether or not there are assetsretired shares of Preferred Stock, is considered for purposes of Net Income per Share to be a deemed dividend in the aggregate amount equal to the amount by which it exceeds the carrying value of the Preferred Stock on the Balance Sheet, or $37.6 million.

The Company legally available formeasures Net Income and Net Income per Share both on a GAAP basis and on an adjusted basis to exclude deemed dividends allocable to retired preferred stock shares (“Adjusted Net Income” and “Adjusted Net Income per Share”). We believe Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Net Income per Share, which are non-GAAP financial measures, provide investors with additional understanding of the paymentCompany’s financial performance as well as its strategic financial planning analysis and period-to-period comparability. These metrics are useful to investors because they reflect how management evaluates the Company’s ongoing operating performance from period-to-period after removing certain transactions and activities that affect comparability of such dividends in whole or in part. Referthe metrics and are not reflective of the Company’s core operations.
55


 Three Months Ended 
December 31,
Year Ended 
December 31,
2021202020212020
Numerator (in millions):
Net income$116.2 $16.4 $175.0 $54.4 
Less: Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative— 0.8 2.1 6.7 
Less: Distributed earnings allocable to retired preferred shares31.0 41.9 37.6 41.9 
Net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders$85.2 $(26.3)$135.3 $5.8 
Plus: Distributed earnings allocable to retired preferred shares$31.0 $41.9 $37.6 $41.9 
Adjusted net income, including distributed earnings allocable to retired preferred shares (Non-GAAP)$116.2 $15.6 $172.9 $47.7 
Denominator (in thousands) (a):
Average common shares outstanding - basic13,873 10,322 13,493 9,825 
Average common shares outstanding - diluted (b)14,278 10,322 13,879 10,123 
 Net Income (Loss) per Share (in dollars):
Basic$6.14 $(2.55)$10.03 $0.59 
Diluted$5.97 $(2.55)$9.75 $0.57 
Plus: Effect of distributed earnings allocable to retired preferred shares, per common share (in dollars):
Basic$2.24 $4.06 $2.78 $4.26 
Diluted$2.17 $4.01 $2.71 $4.14 
Adjusted Net Income per Share (Non-GAAP) (in dollars):
Basic$8.38 $1.51 $12.81 $4.85 
Diluted$8.14 $1.46 $12.46 $4.71 
(a) For details related to average shares outstanding, refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Equity, 14, Net Income (Loss) Per Shareof the consolidated financial statements.statements.


(b) For purposes of Adjusted Net Income per Share for the three months ended December 31, 2020, average common shares outstanding - diluted is 10,659,000 shares. No dilutive effect is recognized in a period in which a net loss has occurred.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


We ended 20192021 with a consolidated cash balance of $130.7$193.8 million. We anticipate having adequate liquidity to support our business operations for at least the next 12 months from the date of this report. Our view of liquidity is dependent on, among other things, conditions affecting our operations, including market, international trade restrictions, COVID-19 and other conditions, and the level of expenditures and government funding for our services contracts, and the timing of customer payments. Liquidity requirements for our existing operations are affected primarily by the timing and amount of customer sales and our inventory purchases.


We believe our sales order book in our LEU segment is a source of stability for our liquidity position. Our sales order book extendsSubject to 2030. Although based on current market conditions, we see limitedthe potential for growing uncommitted demand for LEU forduring the next few years before an anticipated risewith accelerated open demand in uncommitted demand later in the 2020s, we continue to seek2025 and make additional sales, including sales for delivery through the late 2020s.beyond.


Cash resources and net sales proceeds from our LEU segment fund technology costs that are outside of our customer contracts in the technical solutions segment and general corporate expenses, including cash interest payments on our debt. We believe our investment in advanced U.S. uranium enrichment technology will position
56


the Company to meet the needs of our customers as they deploy advanced reactors and next generation fuels. We signed the three-year HALEU Contract with DOE in October 2019 to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of HALEU for advanced reactors.2019. Under the agreement,HALEU Contract, the Company is contributing a portion of the program costs. The program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when Centrus and DOE signed a preliminary letter agreement that allowed work to begin while the full contract was being finalized.


UnderIn 2019, under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million.million (which was recently increased to $126.7 million). The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs incurred above these amounts. As described in Overview above, the portion of our anticipated cost share under the HALEU Contract representing our share of remaining projected program costs was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million as of December 31, 2019. The accrued loss on the contract will be adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results and remaining program cost projections.The HALEU Contract is incrementally funded and DOE is currently obligated for costs up to approximately $53.2 million of the $115 million. The Company has received aggregate cash payments of $10.7$120.3 million through December 31, 2019.2021.


ThereThe Company entered into this cost-share contract with DOE as a critical first step on the road back to the commercial production of enriched uranium, which the Company had terminated in 2013 with the closure of the Paducah GDP. HALEU is expected to be required by many of the advanced reactor designs now under development, including nine out of the ten reactor designs that were selected in 2020 for the ARDP. Our HALEU Contract expires in 2022 and although we believe demand for HALEU will emerge over the next several years, there are no guarantees about whether or when government or commercial demand for HALEU will materialize, and there are a number of technical, regulatory and economic hurdles that must be overcome for these fuels and reactors to come to the market. Assuming that we are able to win a contract from DOE to operate the cascade, our goal is to scale up the facility in modular fashion as demand for HALEU grows in the commercial and government sectors, subject to the availability of funding and/or contracts to purchase the output of the plant. At this time, however, there is no assurance that sufficient government or commercial funding or demand for material will be timely secured, that we will be awarded a contract by the DOE to operate or that we will be permitted by DOE to expand the demonstration cascade. For further discussion, refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.


We lease facilities and related personal property innear Piketon, Ohio from DOE. We previously provided financial assurance in the form of surety bonds to DOE for lease turnover obligations and to the NRC for D&D obligations related to the facility. These surety bonds were fully cash collateralized by us. We completed our obligations and, in 2019, the financial assurance instruments were cancelled and we received the cash collateral totaling $30.5 million including interest.

In connection with the HALEU program,September 2021, DOE and Centrus renewed the lease agreement and extended the lease term through MayDecember 31, 2022.2025. Any facilities or equipment constructed or installed in leased facilities under contract with DOE, including the HALEU Contract, will be owned by DOE,DOE. DOE-owned property may be returned to DOE in an “as is” condition at the end of the lease term and DOE would be responsible for its decontamination and decommissioning.D&D. If we determine the equipment and facilities may benefit Centrus after completion of the HALEU program,Contract, we can extend the facility lease and ownership of the equipment will be transferred to us, subject to mutual agreement regarding D&D and other issues.issues, including those impacted by DOE’s recent decision to competitively bid the contract for operations of the HALEU cascade.


In the event that funding by the U.S. government for research, development and demonstration of gas centrifuge technology is reduced or discontinued, or we are not awarded a DOE contract to operate the cascade we are now constructing under the HALEU Contract, such actions may have a material adverse impact on our ability to deploy the American Centrifuge technology and on our liquidity.



We have taken steps over the last several years to reduce the size and volatility of our defined benefit pension obligations, including offering the option for pension-eligible employees to receive a lump sum payment upon termination of their employment. In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company entered into an arrangement with an insurance company and transferred certain future benefit obligations and administrative costs from our primary qualified pension plan. In this transaction, we transferred approximately $30 million of pension plan assets to the insurance company in order to reduce our pension plan obligations by approximately $30 million. This transaction will save administrative costs associated with the PBGC and reduce the volatility of future pension obligations.


Capital expenditures of approximately $2-3$1 million are anticipated over the next 12 months.


The change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash from our consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows on a summarized basis (in millions):
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities$11.3
 $(74.4)
Cash provided by investing activities0.6
 0.4
Cash used in financing activities(35.0) (11.1)
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$(23.1) $(85.1)

Operating Activities

During 2019, net cash provided by operating activities was $11.3 million. Sources of cash included the $44.0 million increase in deferred revenue and advances from customers, net of deferred costs and the $29.3 million reduction in accounts receivable. The net reduction of $37.9 million in the SWU purchase payables balance, due to the timing of purchase deliveries, was a significant use of cash in the period. Uses of cash also included the $19.5 million increase in pension and postretirement benefits and the net loss of $16.5 million.
During 2018, net cash used in operating activities was $74.4 million. Sources of cash included the monetization of inventory purchased in prior periods, with inventories declining $61.0 million in 2018. The net reduction of $33.4 million in the SWU purchase payables balance, due to the timing of purchase deliveries, was a significant use of cash in 2018. Uses of cash also included the net loss of $104.1 million in 2018, net of non-cash expenses, and the increase in receivables from utility customers of $15.8 million.

Investing Activities

There were no significant capital expenditures in 2019 and 2018. Sales of unneeded assets and property yielded net proceeds of $0.7 million and $0.5 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Financing Activities

In 2019, net cash used for financing included the repayment of $27.5 million of principal due on maturity of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes.

In 2019 and 2018, payments of $6.1 million of interest classified as debt related to the 8.25% Notes were classified as a financing activity. Refer to Note 9, Debt, of the consolidated financial statements regarding the accounting for the 8.25% Notes.

On December 6, 2018, Centrus entered into Exchange Agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with certain holders of the Company’s outstanding 8% PIK Toggle Notes. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreements, the Company exchanged $6.3 million aggregate principal amount of 8% PIK Toggle Notes for 398,638 shares of Class A Common Stock and approximately $5.1 million in cash, which includes accrued and unpaid interest on the 8% PIK Toggle Notes. The Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of $0.5 million, which is net of transaction costs of less than $0.1 million. Refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Equity for details related to the Common Stock.



Working Capital

The following table summarizes the Company’s working capital (in millions):
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Cash and cash equivalents$130.7
 $123.1
Accounts receivable21.1
 60.2
Inventories, net58.9
 26.7
Deposits for financial assurance0.2
 30.3
Current debt(6.1) (32.8)
Deferred revenue, net of deferred costs(98.9) (69.6)
Other current assets and liabilities, net(73.1) (92.1)
Working capital$32.8
 $45.8

Capital Structure and Financial Resources

On September 30, 2019, the Company repaid the outstanding 8% PIK Toggle Notes that matured on September 30, 2019. The Company paid a total of $28.5 million, including $1.0 million in accrued interest. The payment was made in accordance with the terms of the Indenture dated September 30, 2014 (as amended, supplanted, or otherwise modified from time to time) among the Company, the Company’s subsidiary, United States Enrichment Corp., as the note guarantor, and Delaware Trust Company, as trustee and collateral agent. The payment constituted full satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture and the Notes.

Interest on the 8.25% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears as of February 28 and August 31 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The 8.25% Notes are guaranteed on a subordinated and limited basis by, and secured by substantially all assets of, Enrichment Corp. The 8.25% Notes mature on February 28, 2027. Additional terms and conditions of the 8.25% Notes are described in Note 9, Debt, of the consolidated financial statements.

Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to cumulative dividends of 7.5% per annum of the liquidation preference at origination of $104.6 million. We are obligated to pay cash dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock to the extent dividends are declared by the Board of Directors and certain criteria are met. We have not met these criteria for the periods from issuance through December 31, 2019, and have not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2019. Additional terms and conditions of the Series B Preferred Stock, including the criteria that must be met for the payment of dividends, are described in Note 16, Stockholders’ Equity, of the consolidated financial statements.

The nuclear industry in general, and the nuclear fuel industry in particular, are in a period of significant change. We are actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which at any given time may be in various stages of discussions, diligence, or negotiation. If we pursue
57


opportunities that require capital, we believe we would seek to satisfy these needs through a combination of working capital, cash generated from operations or additional debt or equity financing.



The change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash from our consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows on a summarized basis (in millions):

Year Ended 
December 31,
 20212020
Cash provided by operating activities$50.0 $67.1 
Cash used in investing activities(1.2)(1.4)
Cash used in financing activities(9.9)(44.4)
Increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$38.9 $21.3 

Operating Activities

During 2021, net cash provided by operating activities was $50.0 million. Net income of $175.0 million in 2021, net of non-cash expenses, was a significant source of cash. Income included the $43.5 million recovery of claims for reimbursement for costs related to past contract services performed. The net increase is also the result of a $16.6 million increase in accounts payable and other liabilities and a $13.2 million increase in deferred revenue and advances from customers. These increases were partially offset by a $57.0 million reduction in pension and postretirement benefit liabilities and a $10.7 million increase in inventories.

During 2020, net cash provided by operating activities was $67.1 million. Net income of $54.4 million in 2020, net of non-cash expenses, was a significant source of cash. Income included $32.6 million on recovery of bankruptcy court claims. The net increase is also the result of a decrease in inventories of $25.8 million and a $13.2 million increase in payables under SWU purchase agreements. These increases were partially offset by a $32.7 million reduction in pension and postretirement benefit liabilities.
Investing Activities

Investing activities consisted of capital expenditures of $1.2 million in 2021 and $1.4 million in 2020.

Financing Activities

In 2021, net cash used in financing activities included the redemption of preferred stock for $44.4 million, net of direct costs, pursuant to a tender offer and net proceeds received of $42.1 million from the issuance of common stock pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3.

In 2020, net cash used in financing activities included the purchase of preferred stock for $61.6 million, including transaction costs, pursuant to a tender offer and net proceeds received of $23.1 million from the issuance of common stock pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3. See Common Stock Issuance and 2021 Tender Offer below.

In both 2021 and 2020, payments of $6.1 million of interest classified as debt are classified as a financing activity. Refer to Note 8, Debt, of the consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report regarding the accounting for the 8.25% Notes.

58


Working Capital

The following table summarizes the Company’s working capital (in millions):
December 31,
20212020
Cash and cash equivalents$193.8 $152.0 
Accounts receivable29.1 29.6 
Inventories, net82.7 59.9 
Current debt(6.1)(6.1)
Deferred revenue and advances from customers, net of deferred costs(159.8)(131.3)
Other current assets and liabilities, net(67.1)(64.1)
Working capital$72.6 $40.0 

We are managing our working capital to seek to improve the long-term value of our LEU and technical solutions businesses and are planning to continue funding the Company’s qualified pension plans in the ordinary course because we believe that is in the best interest of all stakeholders. We expect that any other uses of working capital will be undertaken in light of these strategic priorities and will be based on the Company’s determination as to the relative strength of its operating performance and prospects, financial position, and expected liquidity requirements. In addition, we expect that any such other uses of working capital will be subject to compliance with contractual restrictions to which the Company and its subsidiaries are subject, including the terms and conditions of theirour debt securities and credit facilities. We continually evaluate alternatives to manage our capital structure, and may opportunistically repurchase, exchange, or redeem Company securities from time to time.


Common Stock Issuance

Pursuant to a sales agreement with its agents, the Company sold at the market price an aggregate of 1,516,467 shares of its Class A Common Stock in 2021, for a total of $44.2 million. After expenses and commissions paid to the agents, the Company’s proceeds total $42.4 million. Additionally, the Company recorded direct costs of $0.3 million related to the issuance. The shares of Class A Common Stock were issued pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239242), which became effective on August 5, 2020, and a prospectus supplement dated December 31, 2020, to the prospectus. At present, the Company has $5.8 million remaining available for sale under the prospectus supplement dated December 31, 2020, and may from time to time sell additional shares through the sales agreement. The Company used the net proceeds from this offering for general working capital purposes, to invest in technology development, repay outstanding debt and retire shares of its Series B Senior Preferred Stock.

As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 5, 2021, on February 2, 2021, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Voting Agreement Amendment”) to its existing Voting and Nomination Agreement with Mr. Morris Bawabeh, Kulayba LLC and M&D Bawabeh Foundation, Inc. (collectively, the “MB Group”) and an Exchange Agreement (as described below) whereby the MB Group agreed to support management’s recommendation on certain matters at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and Kulayba LLC agreed to exchange shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Class A Common Stock and a warrant to acquire additional shares of Class A Common Stock. Pursuant to the First Amendment to the Voting and Nomination Agreement, the MB Group agreed to cause all shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record or beneficially owned by the MB Group at the Annual Meeting to be voted in favor of (i) an amendment to extend the length of the term of the Company’s Section 382 Rights Agreement dated as of April 6, 2016, as amended to date, for two years from June 30, 2021, to June 30, 2023, and (ii) an increase of shares of Class A Common Stock reserved for delivery under the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended to date, of an additional 700,000 shares of Class A Common Stock.

59


In connection with the entry into the Voting Agreement Amendment, the Company and Kulayba LLC also entered into the Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which Kulayba LLC agreed to the Exchange, representing a $5,000,198 liquidation preference (including accrued and unpaid dividends), for (i) 231,276 shares of Class A Common Stock priced at the closing market price of $21.62 on the date the Exchange Agreement was signed and (ii) a warrant (the “Warrant”), exercisable for 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $21.62 per share, which was the closing market price on the date the Exchange Agreement was signed, subject to certain customary adjustments pursuant to the terms of the Warrant. The Warrant is exercisable by Kulayba LLC for a period commencing on the closing date of the Exchange and ending, unless sooner terminated as provided in the Warrant, on the first to occur of: (a) the second anniversary of the closing date of the Exchange or (b) the last business day immediately prior to the consummation of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Warrant) which results in the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction owning less than 50% of the voting equity of the surviving entity immediately after the consummation of the Fundamental Transaction. The Company retired the 3,873 shares of Preferred Stock received by the Company under the Exchange Agreement.

Capital Structure and Financial Resources

Interest on the 8.25% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears as of February 28 and August 31 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The 8.25% Notes are guaranteed on a subordinated and limited basis by, and secured by substantially all assets of, Enrichment Corp. The 8.25% Notes mature on February 28, 2027. Additional terms and conditions of the 8.25% Notes are described in Note 8, Debt, of the consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report.

2021 Tender Offer

On October 20, 2021, the Company announced the commencement of a tender offer to purchase all of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Series B Senior Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,145.20 per Series B Senior Preferred Stock (inclusive of any rights to accrued but unpaid dividends), to the sellers in cash, less any applicable withholding taxes (the “Offer”). The Offer was made pursuant to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed by the Company on October 20, 2021, with the SEC. The aggregate liquidation preference per Series B Senior Preferred Stock (including accrued but unpaid dividends) was $1,347.29 as of September 30, 2021.

On November 23, 2021, the Company announced the results of the tender offer and the related consent solicitation (the “Consent Solicitation”) to amend the certificate of designation of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Amendment”). 36,867 shares of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock were properly tendered and not properly withdrawn in the Offer, and corresponding consents have been delivered in the Consent Solicitation. Pursuant to the terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, the Company has accepted for purchase all of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock tendered in the Offer, for an aggregate purchase price of $42.2 million. The accepted shares represent 97.4% of the Company’s outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2021. Based on the final results, the requisite consent of at least 90% of the outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock required to approve the Series B Preferred Amendment was obtained. On November 23, 2021, the Company issued a Notice of Full Redemption providing for the redemption of any and all shares Series B Senior Preferred Stock outstanding after consummation of the Company’s tender offer to purchase all of its issued and outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock. On December 15, 2021, the Company completed the redemption of all 980 outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock for aggregate cash consideration of $1.1 million. The aggregate purchase price of $43.3 million was offset by direct costs totaling $0.9 million.
The effect of the Series B Preferred Amendment was to: (i) cease any obligation to pay dividends on Series B Senior Preferred Stock (other than the payment of accrued dividends in connection with a redemption or distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up), (ii) permit the Company to redeem Series B Senior Preferred Stock during the 90 days following the date of effectiveness of the Series B Preferred Amendment at a redemption price per share equal to $1,145.20 (plus any additional accrued dividends for the period from and including the date
60


of effectiveness of the Series B Preferred Amendment to the date of redemption), (iii) remove the prohibition on the declaration and payment of dividends on junior stock of the Company, which includes all shares of the Company’s capital stock defined as “Common Stock” in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, or the redemption, purchase or acquisition of such junior stock, and (iv) remove the restriction on redemption, purchase or acquisition of capital stock of the Company ranking on parity with the Series B Senior Preferred Stock.

On December 16, 2021, the Company filed a Certificate of Elimination of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock of Centrus Energy Corp. with the Secretary of State of Delaware (the “Certificate of Elimination”) to eliminate the designation of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock and to return all shares of preferred stock of the Company previously designated as Series B Senior Preferred Stock to authorized but unissued and undesignated shares of preferred stock of the Company.

2020 Tender Offer

On November 17, 2020, pursuant to a tender offer announced on October 19, 2020, the Company completed the purchase of 62,854 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $954.59, less any applicable withholding taxes, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $60 million. The purchase price per share represented a 25% discount from the aggregate liquidation preference, including accrued but unpaid dividends, of $1,272.78 per share as of September 30, 2020. These shares represented approximately 60% of the Company's outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2020. The remaining Series B Senior Preferred Stock outstanding after the transaction was 41,720 shares.

Commitments under Long-Term SWU Purchase Agreements


The Company purchases SWU contained in LEU from Russia, supplied to us under a long-term agreement, as amended, signed in 2011 with the Russian government owned entity TENEX. Under a 2018 agreement, the Company will purchase SWU contained in LEU from Orano with deliveries starting as early as 2021.the French government owned company, Orano. Refer to Note 17,16,Commitments and Contingencies, of the consolidated financial statements for additional information.


DOE Technology License


We have a non-exclusive license in DOE inventions that pertain to enriching uranium using gas centrifuge technology. The license agreement with DOE provides for annual royalty payments based on a varying percentage (1% up to 2%) of our annual revenues from sales of the SWU component of LEU produced by us using DOE centrifuge technology. There is a minimum annual royalty payment of $100,000 and the maximum cumulative royalty over the life of the license is $100 million. There is currently no commercial enrichment facility producing LEU using DOE centrifuge technology. We are continuing to advance our U.S. centrifuge technology that has evolved from DOE inventions at specialized facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and near Piketon, Ohio, with a viewplan to deployingdeploy a commercial enrichment facility over the long term once market conditions recover.long-term.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than outstanding surety bonds, our SWU purchase commitments and the license agreement with DOE relating to the American Centrifuge technology, there were no material off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.


New Accounting Standards


Reference is made to New Accounting Standards in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this Annual Report for information on new accounting standards.




Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Not provided as a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Our consolidated financial statements, together with related notes and the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth in Part IV, Item 15.


61


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Centrus maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Centrus in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.


As of December 31, 2019,2021, the end of the period covered by this report, our management performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, and under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.


Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. This evaluation was based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.2021.


This annual report does not include an audit report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to audit by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.



Remediation of Previously Identified Material Weakness

As previously disclosed in Part II, Item 9A, Controls and ProceduresThe effectiveness of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, management identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls over the determination and assessment of accounting impacts for arrangements with customers that could result in modification accounting or other impacts when executed. Because of this material weakness, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2018.

In 2019, management implemented new controls related to the determination and assessment of accounting impacts for arrangements with customers that could result in modification accounting or other impacts when executed. The controls include expanded monthly reviews and additional approvals of these arrangements.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, we completed the testing and evaluation of the operating effectiveness of the controls, and concluded that the previously reported material weakness2021 has been remediatedaudited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as of December 31, 2019.stated in their report herein.


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Other than the steps taken to work towards the remediation of the material weakness identified above, thereThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2019,2021, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Item 9B. Other Information


None.




Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

None.

62


PART III


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


Information regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Annual Report. Additional information concerning directors, executive officers and corporate governance appearing under the captions Proposal 1. Election of Directors, Governance Information Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports, and Board and Committee Membership in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20202022 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 20192021 (the “2020“2022 Proxy Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference.


We have adopted a code of business conduct (the “Code of Business Conduct”) that applies to our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, as well as to members of our board of directors. Our codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct provides a brief summary of the standards of conduct that are at the foundation of our business operations. The codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct states that we conduct our business in strict compliance with all applicable laws. Each employee must read the codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct and sign a form stating that he or she has read, understands and agrees to comply with the codeCode of business conduct.Business Conduct. A copy of the codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct is available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.centrusenergy.com or upon request without charge. We will disclose on the website any amendments to, or waivers from, the codeCode of business conductBusiness Conduct that are required to be publicly disclosed.


Item 11. Executive Compensation


Information concerning executive and director compensation appearing under the captions Executive Compensation and Compensation of Directors in the 20202022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management appearing under the caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the 20202022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Information concerning the common stock that may be issued under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated in May 2017) appearing under the caption Equity Compensation Plan Information in the 20202022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions and director independence appearing under the captions Transactions with Related Persons, and Director Independence in the 20202022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services


Information concerning principal accounting fees and services appearing under the caption Audit and Non-Audit Fees in the 20202022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.




63


PART IV


Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements


(a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements

Reference is made to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.


(2) Financial Statement Schedules


No financial statement schedules are required to be filed as part of this Annual Report.


(3) Exhibits


The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference. The accompanying Exhibit Index identifies each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report.


Item 16.Form 10-K Summary


None.



EXHIBIT INDEX
64


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.Description
1.1Description1.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 31, 2020).
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.13.5

3.6

3.7
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
65


4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10


4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
10.14.17
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12


10.1310.2
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24


10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
1032
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37
10.38
10.39
10.40
10.41
10.42
10.43


10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
10.49
10.50
10.51
10.52
10.53
10.54
66


10.5510.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
67


10.16
10.17
10.18


10.19
10.20
10.21


10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
68




10.5710.27
10.5810.28
10.5910.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37
10.38
10.39
69


10.40
10.41
10.42
10.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
10.49
10.6010.50
10.6110.51
10.6210.52
10.53
2110.54
21
70


(a)Filed herewith.
(b)Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.



(a) Filed herewith.

(b) Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.
71


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Centrus Energy Corp.
Centrus Energy Corp.
March 26, 202011, 2022/s/ Daniel B. Poneman
Daniel B. Poneman
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 26, 2020:
11, 2022:
SignatureTitle
SignatureTitle
/s/ Daniel B. Poneman
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) and Director
Daniel B. Poneman
/s/ Philip O. StrawbridgeSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Philip O. Strawbridge
/s/ John C. DorrianKevin J. Harrill
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
John C. DorrianKevin J. Harrill
/s/ Mikel H. WilliamsChairman of the Board and Director
Mikel H. Williams
/s/ Michael DiamentKirkland H. DonaldDirector
Michael DiamentKirkland H. Donald
/s/ Tetsuo IguchiDirector
Tetsuo Iguchi
/s/ W. Thomas JagodinskiDirector
W. Thomas Jagodinski
/s/ Patricia J. JamiesonTina W. JonasDirector
Patricia J. JamiesonTina W. Jonas
/s/ William J. MadiaDirector
William J. Madia
/s/ Bradley K. SawatzkeDirector
Bradley K. Sawatzke
/s/ Neil S. SubinDirector
Neil S. Subin

72



CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






73







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Tothe Board of Directors and Stockholders of Centrus Energy Corp.


OpinionOpinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Centrus Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, (loss), of stockholders' deficit and of cash flows for the years then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.


Change in Accounting PrincipleBasis for Opinions


As discussed in Note 1 to theThe Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.

Basismaintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibilityits assessment of the Company’s management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding offraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectivenesswas maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the Company's internal control overconsolidated financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our auditsstatements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
74


assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Valuation Allowance related to Federal Deferred Tax Assets

As described in Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements, as of December 31, 2021, the Company’s deferred tax assets were $464.8 million, net of a valuation allowance of $414.7 million, both of which a significant portion relates to federal deferred tax assets. In prior years, management maintained a full valuation allowance against federal deferred tax assets, and in the fourth quarter of 2021, management released $40.7 million of the valuation allowance against federal deferred taxes that most likely will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient income in future years when deferred tax assets are recoverable or are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets may not be realized. Management evaluates both positive and negative evidence that is objectively verifiable to determine the amount of the federal valuation allowance. Sustained profitability and cumulative income, as well as, forecasted income, are considered to be significant forms of positive evidence. Negative evidence includes uncertainty in and the lack of objectively verifiable evidence for profitability in later years when the Company’s existing sales order book and supply contracts reach expiration.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation allowance related to federal deferred tax assets is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when assessing the ability to realize the federal deferred tax assets and whether a valuation allowance is necessary, particularly as it relates to forecasted income and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s significant assumptions related to forecasted income.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the ability to realize federal deferred tax assets and whether a valuation allowance is necessary, including controls over forecasted income. These procedures also included, among others (i) testing management’s process for assessing the ability to realize federal deferred tax assets and whether a valuation allowance is necessary; (ii) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in management’s process for assessing the ability to realize federal deferred tax assets and whether a valuation allowance is necessary; and (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to forecasted income. Evaluating management’s assumption related to the forecasted income involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the Company; (ii) the terms of the Company’s existing contractual agreements with its customers and suppliers; (iii) the source and reliability of market related inputs; and (iv) whether the assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.
75




/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 26, 202011, 2022


We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2002.












76


CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share and per share data)
December 31,
 20212020
ASSETS  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$193.8 $152.0 
Accounts receivable29.1 29.6 
Inventories91.1 64.8 
Deferred costs associated with deferred revenue143.3 151.9 
Other current assets8.6 7.8 
Total current assets465.9 406.1 
Property, plant and equipment, net5.3 4.9 
Deposits for financial assurance2.8 5.7 
Intangible assets, net54.7 62.8 
Deferred tax assets, net41.4 1.9 
Other long-term assets2.3 4.9 
Total assets$572.4 $486.3 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT  
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$37.8 $50.6 
Payables under inventory purchase agreements37.9 21.3 
Inventories owed to customers and suppliers8.4 4.9 
Deferred revenue and advances from customers303.1 283.2 
Current debt6.1 6.1 
Total current liabilities393.3 366.1 
Long-term debt101.8 108.0 
Postretirement health and life benefit obligations114.9 130.8 
Pension benefit liabilities23.1 124.4 
Advances from customers45.1 45.2 
Other long-term liabilities36.1 32.4 
Total liabilities714.3 806.9 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)00
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, none issued— — 
Series B Senior Preferred Stock, 7.5% cumulative, 0 and 41,720 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $53.9 as of December 31, 2020— 0.1 
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 70,000,000 shares authorized, 13,649,933 and 11,390,189 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively1.4 1.1 
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 719,200 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 20200.1 0.1 
Excess of capital over par value140.7 85.0 
Accumulated deficit(284.6)(407.7)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax0.5 0.8 
Total stockholders’ deficit(141.9)(320.6)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit$572.4 $486.3 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
ASSETS   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$130.7
 $123.1
Accounts receivable21.1
 60.2
Inventories64.5
 129.7
Deferred costs associated with deferred revenue144.1
 134.9
Deposits for financial assurance0.2
 30.3
Other current assets9.0
 6.3
Total current assets369.6
 484.5
Property, plant and equipment, net3.7
 4.2
Deposits for financial assurance5.7
 6.3
Intangible assets, net69.5
 76.0
Other long-term assets7.4
 0.7
Total assets$455.9
 $571.7
    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT 
  
Current liabilities: 
  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$50.7
 $52.4
Payables under SWU purchase agreements8.1
 46.0
Inventories owed to customers and suppliers5.6
 103.0
Deferred revenue and advances from customers266.3
 204.5
Current debt6.1
 32.8
Total current liabilities336.8
 438.7
Long-term debt114.1
 120.2
Postretirement health and life benefit obligations138.6
 136.2
Pension benefit liabilities141.8
 168.9
Advances from customers29.4
 15.0
Other long-term liabilities32.1
 14.6
Total liabilities792.8
 893.6
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 

Stockholders’ deficit:   
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized   
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, none issued
 
Series B Senior Preferred Stock, 7.5% cumulative, 104,574 shares issued and outstanding and an aggregate liquidation preference of $127.2 as of December 31, 2019 and $119.3 as of December 31, 20184.6
 4.6
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 70,000,000 shares authorized, 8,347,427 and 8,031,307 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively0.8
 0.8
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 1,117,462 and 1,406,082 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively0.1
 0.1
Excess of capital over par value61.5
 61.2
Accumulated deficit(405.0) (388.5)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax1.1
 (0.1)
Total stockholders’ deficit(336.9) (321.9)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit$455.9
 $571.7

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in millions, except share and per share data)

 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Revenue:   
Separative work units$123.7
 $130.6
Uranium45.7
 33.8
Technical solutions40.3
 28.6
Total revenue209.7
 193.0
Cost of Sales:   
Separative work units and uranium118.6
 187.7
Technical solutions58.6
 23.2
Total cost of sales177.2
 210.9
Gross profit (loss)32.5
 (17.9)
Advanced technology costs14.6
 26.1
Selling, general and administrative33.7
 39.9
Amortization of intangible assets6.5
 6.6
Special charges (credits) for workforce reductions and advisory costs(1.9) 2.2
Gain on sales of assets(0.7) (0.3)
Operating loss(19.7) (92.4)
Gain on early extinguishment of debt
 (0.5)
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)(4.3) 10.6
Interest expense3.0
 4.1
Investment income(2.2) (2.5)
Loss before income taxes(16.2) (104.1)
Income tax expense0.3
 
Net loss and comprehensive loss(16.5) (104.1)
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative7.8
 7.8
Net loss allocable to common stockholders$(24.3) $(111.9)
    
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted$(2.54) $(12.23)
Average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted (in thousands)9,566
 9,151



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

77






CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions, except share and per share data)

Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Revenue:
Separative work units$163.3 $151.5 
Uranium22.8 39.0 
Technical solutions112.2 56.7 
Total revenue298.3 247.2 
Cost of Sales:
Separative work units and uranium113.1 92.7 
Technical solutions70.7 56.9 
Total cost of sales183.8 149.6 
Gross profit114.5 97.6 
Advanced technology costs2.1 2.8 
Selling, general and administrative36.0 36.0 
Amortization of intangible assets8.1 6.8 
Special charges for workforce reductions— 0.6 
Other expense, net— 0.4 
Operating income68.3 51.0 
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit (income) expense(67.6)(1.6)
Interest expense0.1 0.1 
Investment income(0.1)(0.5)
Income before income taxes135.9 53.0 
Income tax benefit(39.1)(1.4)
Net income and comprehensive income175.0 54.4 
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative2.1 6.7 
   Distributed earnings allocable to retired preferred shares37.6 41.9 
Net income allocable to common stockholders$135.3 $5.8 
Net income per common share:
Basic$10.03 $0.59 
Diluted$9.75 $0.57 
Average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands):
Basic13,493 9,825 
Diluted13,879 10,123 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

78


CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020
OPERATING 
Net income$175.0 $54.4 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization8.6 7.3 
Accrued loss on long-term contract(7.2)(10.6)
Deferred tax assets(39.5)(1.9)
Retirement benefit plans (gains) losses, net(50.5)7.2 
Revaluation of inventory borrowing4.8 — 
Equity related compensation12.1 7.1
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable0.5 (8.6)
Inventories, net(10.7)25.8 
Payables under inventory purchase agreements16.6 13.2 
Deferred revenue and advances from customers, net of deferred costs13.2 9.7 
Accounts payable and other liabilities(4.6)(5.2)
Pension and postretirement liabilities(67.0)(32.7)
Other, net(1.3)1.4 
Cash provided by operating activities50.0 67.1 
INVESTING
Capital expenditures(1.2)(1.4)
Cash used in investing activities(1.2)(1.4)
FINANCING
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net42.1 23.1 
Redemption of preferred stock, net(44.4)(61.6)
Payment of interest classified as debt(6.1)(6.1)
Exercise of stock options0.9 0.3 
Shares withheld for employee taxes(2.4)— 
Payments for deferred issuance costs— (0.1)
Cash used in financing activities(9.9)(44.4)
Increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash38.9 21.3 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period (Note 3)157.9 136.6 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period (Note 3)$196.8 $157.9 
Supplemental cash flow information:
Non-cash activities:
Property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$— $0.3 
79


 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
OPERATING   
Net loss$(16.5) $(104.1)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization7.0
 7.4
Accrued loss on long-term contract18.3
 
Immediate recognition of retirement benefit plans (gains) losses, net(4.0) 17.3
PIK interest on paid-in-kind toggle notes1.1
 1.7
Gain on early extinguishment of debt
 (0.5)
Gain on sales of assets(0.7) (0.4)
Inventory valuation adjustments2.3
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:   
Accounts receivable29.3
 9.7
Inventories, net0.1
 61.0
Payables under SWU purchase agreements(37.9) (33.4)
Deferred revenue and advances from customers, net of deferred costs44.0
 0.1
Accounts payable and other liabilities(12.3) 3.7
Pension and postretirement liabilities(19.5) (28.0)
Other, net0.1
 (8.9)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities11.3
 (74.4)
    
INVESTING   
Capital expenditures(0.1) (0.1)
Proceeds from sales of assets0.7
 0.5
Cash provided by investing activities0.6
 0.4
    
FINANCING   
Principal payments on debt(27.5) (5.0)
Payments for deferred financing costs(1.4) 
Payment of interest classified as debt(6.1) (6.1)
Cash used in financing activities(35.0) (11.1)
    
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(23.1) (85.1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period (Note 4)159.7
 244.8
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period (Note 4)$136.6
 $159.7
    
Supplemental cash flow information:   
Interest paid in cash$1.5
 $7.1
Non-cash activities:   
Conversion of interest payable-in-kind to debt$0.7
 $1.7
Deferred financing costs included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$0.8
 $
Additional right of use operating lease assets recorded$5.2
 $
Disposal of right of use operating lease assets for early termination$0.4
 $
Exchange of debt for Class A common stock$
 $0.9
Equity transaction costs included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities0.4 0.2 
Disposal of right to use lease assets from lease modification1.0 0.2 
Reclassification of equity compensation liability to equity7.5 — 
Common stock and warrant issued in exchange for preferred stock7.5 — 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

80



CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(in millions, except per share data)
Senior Preferred Stock,
Series B
Common Stock,
Class A,
Par Value
$.10 per Share
Common Stock,
Class B,
Par Value
$.10 per Share
Excess of
Capital Over
Par Value
Accumulated DeficitAccumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2019$4.6 $0.8 $0.1 $61.5 $(405.0)$1.1 $(336.9)
Net income— — — — 54.4 — 54.4 
Issuance of common stock— 0.3 — 22.8 — — 23.1 
Purchase under tender offer(4.5)— — — (57.1)— (61.6)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit— — — — — (0.3)(0.3)
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock units and stock options— — — 0.7 — — 0.7 
Balance at December 31, 2020$0.1 $1.1 $0.1 $85.0 $(407.7)$0.8 $(320.6)
Net income— — — — 175.0 — 175.0 
Issuance of common stock— 0.2 — 41.9 — — 42.1 
Exchange of preferred stock for common stock and common stock warrant— 0.1 — 7.5 (7.6)— — 
Purchase under tender offer(0.1)— — — (44.3)— (44.4)
Reclassification of stock-based compensation liability to equity— — — 7.5 — — 7.5 
Shares withheld for employee taxes— — — (2.4)— — (2.4)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit— — — — — (0.3)(0.3)
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock units and stock options— — — 1.2 — — 1.2 
Balance at December 31, 2021$ $1.4 $0.1 $140.7 $(284.6)$0.5 $(141.9)
 
Preferred Stock,
Series B
 
Common Stock,
Class A,
Par Value
$.10 per Share
 
Common Stock,
Class B,
Par Value
$.10 per Share
 
Excess of
Capital Over
Par Value
 Accumulated Deficit 
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 Total
              
Balance at December 31, 2017$4.6
 $0.8
 $0.1
 $60.0
 $(284.5) $0.1
 $(218.9)
              
Adoption of ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 (Note 1)
 
 
 
 0.1
 
 0.1
Net loss
 
 
 
 (104.1) 
 (104.1)
Issuance of common stock
 
 
 0.8
 
 
 0.8
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit
 
 
 
 
 (0.2) (0.2)
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock units and stock options
 
 
 0.4
 
 
 0.4
Balance at December 31, 2018$4.6
 $0.8
 $0.1
 $61.2
 $(388.5) $(0.1) $(321.9)
              
Net loss
 
 
 
 (16.5) 
 (16.5)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax expense
 
 
 
 
 1.2
 1.2
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock units and stock options
 
 
 0.3
 
 
 0.3
Balance at December 31, 2019$4.6
 $0.8
 $0.1
 $61.5
 $(405.0) $1.1
 $(336.9)




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

81



CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation


The consolidated financial statements of Centrus Energy Corp. (“Centrus” or the “Company”), which include the accounts of the Company, its principal subsidiary United States Enrichment Corporation (“Enrichment Corp.”) and its other subsidiaries, were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated.


Use of Estimates


The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts presented and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and judgments include, but are not limited to, revenue and related costs, asset valuations, pension and postretirement health and life benefit costs and obligations, the tax bases of assets and liabilities, the future recoverability of deferred tax assets, and determination of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual results may differ from such estimates, and estimates may change if the underlying conditions or assumptions change.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents include short-term or highly liquid assets with original maturities of three months or less.


Inventories and Inventories Owed to Customers and Suppliers


Low-enriched uranium (“LEU”) consists of two components: separative work units (“SWU”) and uranium. SWU is a standard unit of measurement that represents the effort required to transform a given amount of natural uranium into two components: enriched uranium having a higher percentage of U235 and depleted uranium having a lower percentage of U235. The SWU contained in LEU is calculated using an industry standard formula based on the physics of enrichment. The amount of enrichment deemed to be contained in LEU under this formula is commonly referred to as its SWU component and the quantity of natural uranium deemed to be used in the production of LEU under this formula is referred to as its uranium or “feed” component.


SWU and uranium inventory costs are determined using the average cost method. SWU and uranium purchase costs include shipping costs when applicable. Inventories of SWU and uranium are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The estimated selling price for SWU and uranium is based on the pricing terms of contracts in the Company’s sales order book, and, for uranium not under contract, the estimated selling price is based primarily on published price indicators at the balance sheet date.


Inventories owed to customers and suppliers, included in current liabilities, consist primarily of SWU and uranium inventories owed to fabricators. Fabricators process LEU into fuel for use in nuclear reactors. Under inventory optimization arrangements between Centrus and domestic fabricators, fabricators order quantities of LEU from Centrus based on scheduled or anticipated orders from utility customers, for deliveries in future periods. As delivery obligations under actual customer orders arise, Centrus typically satisfies these obligations by arranging for the transfer to the customer of title to the specified quantity of LEU at the fabricator. Centrus’ balances of SWU and uranium vary over time based on the timing and size of the fabricator’s LEU orders from Centrus and the fabricator’s needs for working stock of LEU. Balances can be positive or negative at the discretion of the fabricator.
82


Fabricators have other inventory supplies and, where a fabricator has elected to order less material from Centrus


than Centrus is required to deliver to its customers at the fabricator, the fabricator will use these other inventories to satisfy Centrus’ customer order obligations on Centrus’ behalf. In such cases, the transfer of title of LEU from Centrus to the customer results in quantities of SWU and uranium being owed by Centrus to the fabricator. The amounts of SWU and uranium owed to fabricators are satisfied as future deliveries of LEU to fabricators are made.
Deferred Taxes


Centrus follows the asset and liability approach to account for deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax consequences of temporary differences between the balance sheet carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred taxes are based on income tax rates in effect for the years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in income tax rates is recognized in income when the change in rates is enacted in the law. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets may not be realized.


Property, Plant and Equipment


Property, plant and equipment are recorded at acquisition cost. Leasehold improvements and machinery and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the assets or the lease term, if applicable. Refer also to Carrying Value of Long-Lived Assets below.


Intangible Assets


Centrus has intangible assets resulting from fresh start accounting as a result of emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 30, 2014. The identifiable intangible assets relate to the sales order book and customer relationships. The order book intangible asset is amortized as the order book valued at emergence is reduced, principally as a result of deliveries to customers. The customer relationships intangible asset is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated average useful life of 15 years.years, with 7 ¾ years of scheduled amortization remaining. Refer also to Carrying Value of Long-Lived Assets below.


Carrying Value of Long-Lived Assets


The Company evaluates the carrying values of property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of asset, or asset group, may not be fully recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset, or asset group, exceeds its fair value.
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement


Accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, consideration is given to the principal or most advantageous market and assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.


Pursuant to accounting standards, Centrus’ 8.25% notes due February 2027 (the “8.25% Notes”) and its former 8.0% paid-in-kind (“PIK”) toggle notes (the “8% PIK Toggle Notes”) are recorded at face value and the fair value is disclosed. The estimated fair value of each of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes and the 8.25% Notes is based on recent trading prices and bid/ask quotes as of or near the balance sheet date. Debt issuance costs are deferred and amortized over the life of the instrument.


83



The balance sheet carrying amounts for accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and payables under SWU purchase agreements approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of the instruments.


Concentrations of Credit Risk


Credit risk could result from the possibility of a customer failing to perform or pay according to the terms of a contract. Extension of credit is based on an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition. Centrus regularly monitors credit risk exposure and takes steps intended to mitigate the likelihood of such exposure resulting in a loss.


Concentrations of Supply Risk and Other Considerations with the War in Ukraine

The current war in Ukraine has led to the U.S., Russia and other countries imposing sanctions and other measures that restrict international trade. The situation is rapidly changing, and it is not possible to predict future actions that could be taken. The Company has multiple sources of supply; however, the supply contract with TENEX remains our largest source. At present, sanctions have not impacted the ability of the Company or TENEX to perform under the TENEX supply contract. Recently, sanctions have been imposed by the U.S. on exports of fossil fuels. Russia has imposed sanctions on the export of commodities but does not include the export of LEU. Additional sanctions or other measures by the U.S. or foreign governments (including the Russian government) could be imposed. Any sanctions or measures directed at trade in LEU from Russia or the parties involved in such trade or otherwise could interfere with, or prevent, implementation of the TENEX Supply Contract. While the initial sanctions announced do not affect the ability of the Company or TENEX to implement the TENEX Supply Contract, the situation at this time is unpredictable and therefore there is no assurance that future developments would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s procurement, payment, delivery or sale of LEU under the TENEX Supply Contract.

If measures were taken to limit the supply of Russian LEU or to prohibit or limit dealings with Russian entities, including, but not limited to, TENEX or ROSATOM, the Company would seek a license, waiver or other approval from the government imposing such measures to ensure that the Company could continue to fulfill its purchase and sales obligations. There is no assurance that such a license, waiver, or approval would be granted. If a license, waiver or approval were not granted, the Company would need to look to alternative sources of LEU to replace the LEU that it could not procure from TENEX. The Company has contracts for alternative sources that could be used to mitigate a portion of the near term impacts. However, to the extent these sources were insufficient or more expensive or additional supply cannot be obtained, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and competitive position.

Segments


Centrus operates two business segments: LEU, which supplies various components of nuclear fuel to utilities, and technical solutions, which provides advanced engineering, design, and manufacturing services to government and private sector customers. The technical solutions segment was formerly the Company’s contract services segment. The segment was renamed the technical solutions segment

Related Party

As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 31, 2019,2020, on that same date the
Company entered into an At Market Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with B. Riley Securities, Inc. and
Lake Street Capital Markets, LLC (the “Agents”), relating to better reflect the natureat the market offering (the “ATM Offering”) of work performed and is consistent with
shares of the Company’s marketing of service offerings as Centrus Technical Solutions. There was no change to the compositionClass A Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share. Mr. Williams, Chairman of the segment as a resultCentrus
Board of Directors, also serves on the board of B. Riley Financial, Inc. Mr. Williams recused himself and took no
part in the selection of B. Riley or the negotiation of the re-naming.terms of the Sales Agreement. Please refer to Note 15 - Stockholders’ Equity for a description of the ATM Offering in 2021.


84


Revenue

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective method as applied to customer contracts that were not completed as of the adoption date. As a result, financial information for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, are presented under ASC 606. There was no material impact of adopting ASC 606 for sales under the LEU segment. For sales under the technical solutions segment, revenue is now primarily recognized over time as control is transferred to the customer.


The Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. Revenue for product and service sales is recognized when or as the Company transfers control of the promised products or services to the customer. Revenue is measured at the transaction price, which is based on the amount of consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring the promised goods or services to the customer. The transaction price will include estimates of variable consideration until it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue recognized will not occur.


SWU and Uranium Revenue


Revenue for the Company’s LEU segment is derived from sales of the SWU component of LEU, from sales of both the SWU and uranium components of LEU, and from sales of uranium. Contracts with customers are primarily medium and long-term, fixed-commitment contracts under which its customers are obligated to purchase a specified quantity of the SWU component of LEU or the SWU and uranium components of LEU. The Company’s contracts for natural uranium are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts.


Revenue is recognized at the time the customer obtains control of the LEU or uranium. Customers generally obtain control of LEU at nuclear fuel fabricators. Centrus ships LEU to nuclear fuel fabricators for scheduled or anticipated orders from utility customers. Based on customer orders, Centrus arranges for the transfer of title of LEU from Centrus to the customer for the specified quantity of LEU at the fuel fabricator. Each such delivery to a customer is accounted for as a distinct performance obligation under a contract, and a contract may call for multiple deliveries over a number of periods. The contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the observable standalone selling price of each distinct delivery of SWU or uranium. For certain contracts the customers may elect not to take control of the LEU or uranium and Centrus may have the right to enforce payment under the terms of the contractual agreement. The revenue recognition for these contracts is assessed when it occurs.




Utility customers in general have the option to defer receipt of uranium products purchased from the Company beyond the contractual sale period. In such cases, title to SWU and/or uranium components are transferred to the customer and a performance obligation for Centrus is created and a receivable is recorded. Cash is collected for the receivable under normal credit terms. The performance obligation is represented as Deferred Revenue on the consolidated balance sheet and the customer-titled product is classified as Deferred Costs Associated with Deferred Revenue on the consolidated balance sheet. Risk of loss remains with Centrus until the customer obtains control of the uranium product. The recognition of revenue and related cost of sales occurs at the point in time at which the customer obtains control of SWU or uranium and risk of loss of the product transfers to the customer, which may occur beyond one year. The timing of the transfer of control, subject to notice period requirements, is at the option of the customer. As such, deferred costs and deferred revenue are classified within current assets and current liabilities, respectively.


On occasion, the Company will accept payment in the form of uranium. Revenue from the sale of SWU under such contracts is recognized at the time transfer of control of LEU occurs and is based on the fair value of the uranium at contract inception or as the quantity of uranium is finalized, if variable. The Company may also borrow SWU from customers, in which case the Company will record the SWU and the related liability for the borrowing using a projected average purchase price over the borrowing period.


Amounts billed to customers for handling costs are included in sales. Handling costs are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are included in cost of sales. The Company does not have shipping costs associated with outbound freight after control over a product has transferred to a customer. The Company’s contracts with customers do not provide for significant payment terms or financing components.


85


Technical Solutions Revenue


Revenue for the technical solutions segment, principally representing technical, manufacturing, engineering, procurement, construction and operations services offered to public and private sector customers, is recognized over the contractual period as services are rendered. The Company recognizes revenue over time as it performs on these contracts because of the continuous transfer of control to the customer. For public sector contracts, this continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the contract that allow the customer to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience, pay the Company for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and assume control of any work in progress. The Company’s government and private sector contracts generally contain contractual termination clauses or entitle the Company to payments for work performed to date for goods and services that do not have an alternative use. With control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. A contract may contain one or more performance obligations. Two or more promises to transfer goods or services to a customer may be considered a single performance obligation if the goods or services are highly interdependent or highly interrelated such that utility of the promised goods or services to the customer includes integration services provided by the Company.


The Company determines the transaction price for each contract based on the consideration it expects to receive for the products or services being provided under the contract. If transaction prices are not stated in the contract for each performance obligation, contractual prices are allocated to performance obligations based on estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised services.


The Company generally uses the cost-to-cost input method of progress for performance obligations to deliver products with continual transfer of control to the customer, because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer that occurs as the Company incurs costs. Under the cost-to-cost method, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the proportion of direct costs incurred to date to the total estimated direct costs at completion of the performance obligation. Revenues are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. For performance obligations to provide services to the customer, revenue is recognized over time based on direct costs incurred or the right to invoice method (in situations where the value transferred matches the Company’s billing rights) as the customer receives and consumes the benefits.




UnderUse of the cost-to-cost method requires the Company is required to make reasonably dependable estimates to calculate revenue andof costs at completion associated with the design, manufacture and delivery of products and services.services in order to calculate revenue. Significant judgment is used to estimate total revenue and costs at completion.completion, particularly in the assumptions related to internal labor hours and third-party services for which a vendor invoice or quote is not yet available. As a significant change in one or more estimates could affect the profitability of the Company’s contracts, the Company reviews and updates its contract-related estimates regularly. Adjustments in estimated profits/losses are recognized under the cumulative catch-up method. Under this method, the impact of the adjustments is recognized in the period the adjustment is recognized. When estimates of total costs to be incurredat completion for such an integrated, construction type contract exceed total estimates of revenue to be earned on a performance obligation related to complex equipment or related services, a provision for the entireremaining loss on the performance obligation is recognized in the period the loss is identified.determined.


The Company has applied the practical expedient in paragraph ASC 606-10-50-14 and does not providedisclose the value of remaining performance obligations under service contracts having original expected terms of one year or less.


The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Progress on satisfying performance obligations under contracts with customers and the related billings and cash collections are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as contract assets or contract liabilities. Contract balances are classified as assets or liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis at the end of each reporting period.


Unbilled receivables are included in Accounts Receivable on the consolidated balance sheet and arise when the timing of cash collected from customers differs from the timing of revenue recognition, such as when contract provisions require specific milestones to be met before a customer can be billed.recognition. Those assets are recognized when the revenue associated with the contract is recognized prior to billing and derecognized when billed in
86


accordance with the terms of the contract. To the extent billings to the customer precede the recognition of technical solutions revenue, the Company recognizes a liability included in Deferred Revenue and Advances from Customers on the consolidated balance sheet.


Advanced Technology Costs


American Centrifuge and related expenses that are outside of our customer contracts are included in Advanced Technology Costs, including caretaker costs at the Piketon facility prior to the commencement of work under the HALEU contract in June 2019..


Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Benefit Plans


The Company provides retirement benefits to certain employees and retirees under defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health and life benefit plans. The valuation of benefit obligations and costs is based on provisions of the plans and actuarial assumptions that involve judgments and estimates. Plan assets and benefit obligations are remeasured each year as of the balance sheet date, or when lump sum payments exceed certain levels, resulting in differences between actual and projected results. The Company has elected to recognize these actuarial gains and losses immediately in the statement of operations to provide transparency regarding the impacts of changes in plan assets and benefit obligations.


Stock-Based Compensation


Centrus has a stock-based compensation plan which authorizes the issuance of common stock to the Company’s employees, officers, directors, and other individuals providing services to the Company or its affiliates pursuant to options, notional stock units, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other stock basedstock-based awards.

Stock-based compensation cost isfor options and stock-settled awards are measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. The cost is recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.



Stock-based compensation cost for awards likely to be settled with cash payments are recognized over the requisite service period and accrued as a liability and re-measured each reporting period based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock.


The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur.

New Accounting Standards


Recently Adopted Accounting Standards


In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“Topic 842”), which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019, using the modified transition method which provides for recognition of existing leases as of the adoption date without requiring comparable presentation for the prior period. Lease assets and liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The Company’s leases do not provide an implicit interest rate. The Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the term of the lease using information available at the adoption date or the lease commencement, if later, including the yield on the Company’s collateralized debt. The Company has elected to adopt the package of practical expedients provided under Topic 842, which allowed the Company to not apply a reassessment of whether any existing or expired contracts contain leases, reassessment of lease classification for existing or expired leases and reassessment of initial direct costs for leases. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations or statement of cash flows. Refer to Note 10, Leases, for additional information.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in ASU 2018-02 allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”). However, because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019, and elected not to reclassify the stranded tax effect resulting from the 2017 Tax Act to retained earnings.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, that is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. The Company has elected early adoption of ASU 2019-12. Early adoption on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2019 allows the Company to not be required to apply the exception to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation when there is a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items. As a result, the tax effect of pre-tax income or loss from continuing operations should be determined without considering the tax effects of items that are not included in continuing operations. Based on the Company’s assessment, no other provisions of ASU 2019-12 impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period of adoption.

Accounting Standards Effective in Future Periods

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20), which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The standard is to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluatingAdoption of this new standard did not have a significant impact to the effect that the provisions of ASU 2018-14 will have on its consolidated financial statements.Company’s annual disclosures.



87





2. REVENUE AND CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS


Disaggregation of Revenue


The following table presents revenue from SWU and uranium sales disaggregated by geographical region, including foreign countries representing 10% or more of revenue, based on the billing addresses of customers (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
United States$108.3 $115.0 
Foreign:
Belgium36.6 35.8 
Japan34.6 23.4 
Other6.6 16.3 
Total foreign77.8 75.5 
      Revenue - SWU and uranium$186.1 $190.5 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
United States$112.1
 $112.7
Foreign:   
Japan23.4
 *
Belgium21.5
 35.2
Other12.4
 16.5
Total foreign57.3
 51.7
      Revenue - SWU and uranium$169.4
 $164.4
* less than 10%   


Refer to Note 19,18, Revenue by Geographic Area, Major Customers and Segment Information for disaggregation of revenue by segment. Disaggregation by end-market is provided in Note 1918 and the consolidated statements of operations. SWU and uranium sales are made primarily to electric utility customers.customers, and uranium sales are primarily made to other nuclear fuel related companies. Technical solutions revenue resulted primarily from services provided to the U.S. government and its contractors. SWU and uranium revenue is recognized at point of sale and technical solutions revenue is generally recognized over time.


SWU revenue in 2020 includes $32.6 million collected from a customer in settlement of a supply contract that was subject to the customer’s bankruptcy proceeding.

Accounts Receivable
December 31,
20212020
($ millions)
Accounts receivable:
Billed$23.1 $23.0 
Unbilled (a)6.0 6.6 
Accounts receivable$29.1 $29.6 
(a) Billings under certain contracts in the technical services segment are invoiced based on approved provisional billing rates. Unbilled revenue represents difference between actual costs incurred and invoiced amounts. The Company expects to invoice and collect the unbilled amounts after actual rates are submitted to the customer and approved. Unbilled revenue also includes unconditional rights to payment that are not yet billable under applicable contracts pending the compilation of supporting documentation.

88


  December 31, 
  2019 2018 
  ($ millions)
Accounts receivable:     
Billed $13.2
 $50.4
 
Unbilled * 7.9
 
 
Uranium feed receivable 
 9.8
 
Accounts receivable $21.1
 $60.2
 
      
* Billings under certain contracts in the technical services segment are invoiced based on approved provisional billing rates. Unbilled revenue represents difference between actual costs incurred and invoiced amounts. The Company expects to invoice and collect the unbilled amounts after actual rates are submitted to the customer and approved. Unbilled revenue also includes unconditional rights to revenue that is not yet billable under applicable contracts pending the compilation of supporting documentation. 




Contract Liabilities


The following table presents changes in contract liability balances (in millions):
December 31,
20212020Change
Accrued loss on HALEU Contract:
Current - Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$0.5 $7.0 $(6.5)
Non-current - Other long-term liabilities
$— $0.7 $(0.7)
Deferred revenue - current$288.1 $281.7 $6.4 
Advances from customers - current$15.0 $1.5 $13.5 
Advances from customers - non current$45.1 $45.2 $(0.1)
  December 31,  
  2019 2018 Change
Accrued loss on HALEU Contract:      
Current - Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 $10.0
 $
 $10.0
Noncurrent - Other long-term liabilities
 $8.3
 $
 $8.3
Deferred revenue - current $243.0
 $204.5
 $38.5
Advances from customers - current $23.3
 $
 $23.3
Advances from customers - noncurrent $29.4
 $15.0
 $14.4


Deferred revenue activitysales totaled $47.2 million and $38.7 million in the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, follows (in millions):2021, and 2020, respectively. Previously deferred sales recognized in revenue totaled $42.6 million and $0 million in the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
 Deferred Sales in the Period Previously Deferred Sales Recognized in the Period Change
Deferred revenue49.2
 (10.7) 38.5


LEU Segment


Under the terms of certain contracts with customers in the LEU segment, the Company will accept payment in the form of uranium. Revenue from the sale of SWU under such contracts is recognized at the time LEU is delivered and is based on the fair value of the uranium at contract inception, or as the quantity of uranium is finalized, if variable. In 2019, SWU revenue of $23.4 million was recognized under such contracts based on the fair market value of uranium acquired in exchange for SWU delivered. Uranium received from customers as advance payments for the future sales of SWU totaled $52.7 million as of December 31, 2019. The advance payments are included in either Advances from Customers, Current or Advances from Customers, Noncurrent, based on the anticipated SWU sales period.
In the third quarter of 2019, the Company borrowed SWU inventory valued at $1.7 million from a customer under terms that require repayment within 48 months. The Company recorded the SWU and the related liability for the borrowings using an average purchase price over the borrowing period. The cumulative liability to the customer of $9.0 million for borrowed inventory is included in Other Liabilities, which is included in noncurrent liabilities.

The SWU component of LEU is typically bought and sold under long-term contracts with deliveries over several years. The Company’s agreements for natural uranium sales are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts. The Company’s order book of sales under contract in the LEU segment (“order book”) extends to 2030. As of2029. For the years ended December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018, the2020, our order book was $1.0 billion.approximately $986 million and $960 million, respectively. The order book isrepresents the estimated aggregate dollar amount of revenue for future SWU and uranium deliveries under contract and includes the approximately $348.2 million of Deferred Revenue and Advances from Customers amounts in theCustomers. Refer to Contract BalancesLiabilities table above. Approximately $0.9 billion of the order book as of December 31, 2019 is anticipated to be recognized as revenue beyond 2020.




Most of the Company’s customer contracts provide for fixed purchases of SWU during a given year. The Company’s order book is partially based on customers’ estimates of the timing and size of their fuel requirements and other assumptions that are subject to change. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, the customer may be able to increase or decrease the quantity delivered within an agreed range. The Company’s order book estimate is also based on the Company’s estimates of selling prices, which may be subject to change. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, prices may be adjusted based on escalation using a general inflation index, published SWU price indicators prevailing at the time of delivery, and other factors, all of which are variable. The Company uses external composite forecasts of future market prices and inflation rates in its pricing estimates.


Under the terms of certain contracts with customers in the LEU segment, the Company will accept payment for SWU in the form of uranium. Revenue from the sale of SWU under such contracts is recognized at the time LEU is delivered and is based on the fair value of the uranium at contract inception, or as the quantity of uranium is finalized, if variable. In 2020, SWU revenue of $23.4 million was recognized under such contracts based on the fair market value of uranium acquired in exchange for SWU delivered. Uranium received from customers as advance payments for the future sales of SWU totaled $59.6 million and $44.4 million as of December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. The advance payments are included in either Advances from Customers, Current or Advances from Customers, Noncurrent, based on the anticipated SWU sales period.

89


Technical Solutions Segment


Revenue for the technical solutions segment, representing the Company’s technical, manufacturing, engineering, procurement, construction and operations services offered to public and private sector customers, is recognized over the contractual period as services are rendered. For details, refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesRevenueTechnical Solutions Revenue.


On October 31, 2019, the Company signed a three-year cost-share contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) (“the HALEU Contract”) to deploy a cascade of centrifuges to demonstrate production of high-assay, low-enriched uranium (“HALEU”) for advanced reactors. HALEU is a component of an advanced nuclear reactor fuel that is not commercially available today and may be required for a number of advanced reactor designs currently under development in both the commercial and government sectors. The program has been under way since May 31, 2019, when the Company and DOE signed a preliminary letter agreement that allowed work to begin while the full contract was being finalized.


UnderIn 2019, under the HALEU Contract, DOE agreed to reimburse the Company for 80% of its costs incurred in performing the contract, up to a maximum of $115 million which was increased to $126.7 million. On March 4, 2022, the DOE informed the Company of their intent to fund an additional $9.0 million above the $126.7 million, as disclosed above. The Company’s cost share is the corresponding 20% and any costs incurredthe Company elects to incur above these amounts. Costs under the HALEU Contract include program costs, including direct labor and materials and associated indirect costs that are classified as Cost of Sales, and an allocation of corporate costs supporting the program that are classified as Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Services to be provided over the three-year contract include constructing and assembling centrifuge machines and related infrastructure in a cascade formation. When estimates of remaining program costs to be incurred for such an integrated, construction-type contract exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned, a provision for the remaining loss on the contract is recorded to Cost of Sales in the period the loss is determined. The Company’s corporate costs supporting the program are recognized as expense as incurred over the duration of the contract term. As of December 31, 2019, the portion of the Company’s anticipated cost share under the HALEU Contract representing the Company’s share of remaining projected program costs was recognized in Cost of Sales as an accrued loss of $18.3 million, consisting of $10.0 million included in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities and $8.3 million included in Other Long-Term Liabilities. The accrued loss on the contract will beis being adjusted over the remaining contract term based on actual results, and remaining program cost projections.projections, and the Company’s anticipated cost-share. The HALEU Contractimpact to Cost of Sales for the year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, is incrementally funded$7.2 million and DOE is currently obligated$10.6 million, respectively, for costs uppreviously accrued contract losses attributable to approximately $53.2work performed in the periods. As of December 31, 2021, a total of $19.1 million of previously accrued contract losses have been realized and the $115accrued contract loss balance included in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities is $0.5 million. The Company has received cash payments of $10.7$120.3 million through December 31, 2019. Of2021.

Additional COVID-19-related impacts, delays in DOE furnishing equipment, or changes to the $115 millionexisting scope of anticipated revenue over the three-year contract term, approximately $40 million is anticipatedHALEU Contract could result in further material increases to be recognizedour estimate of the costs required to complete the HALEU Contract, as revenuewell as delay completion of the contract. The Company does not currently have a contractual obligation to perform work in 2021-2022 (beyond twelve months fromexcess of the fiscalfunding provided by DOE and, therefore, no additional costs have been accrued as of December 31, 2021. If DOE does not commit to fully fund the additional costs, and the Company nevertheless commits to a plan to complete the demonstration cascade and produce HALEU, we may incur material additional costs or losses in future periods that could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and liquidity.

Revenue for the technical solutions segment in the year ended December 31, 2019).

On January 11, 2018, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with DOE and the U.S. government regarding breach of contract claims brought by the Company relating2021, also includes $43.5 million related to work performed by the Company under contracts with DOE and subcontracts with DOE contractors. In connection with the settlement the Company (a) received $4.7 million from the U.S. government, (b) applied approximately $19.3 million of advances from the U.S. government received in prior years against the receivables balance, and (c) recorded additional revenue of $9.5 million.



Centrus and DOE have yet to fully settle the Company’s claimsclaims for reimbursements for certain pension and postretirement benefits costs related toincurred in connection with a past cost-reimbursable contract work performed for DOE. There is the potential for additional income to be recognized for this work pending the outcome of legal proceedings relatedwith DOE unrelated to the Company’s claimsHALEU Contract. On September 7, 2021, after the final approvals for the settlement were received, the settlement agreement was signed by the parties at which time it became probable that there would not be a significant reversal of revenue. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, DOE paid the Company $43.5 million, of which $33.8 million was contributed to the pension plan in September 2021 for its subsidiary United States Enrichment Corp. (“Enrichment Corp.”) and $9.7 million was deposited in October 2021 in a trust for payment and the potential release of previously established valuation allowances on receivables. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting following the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 30, 2014, the receivables related to the Company’s claims forpostretirement health benefits payable by Enrichment Corp. After receiving payment, are carried at fair value as of September 30, 2014, which is net of the valuation allowances. Refer to Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies.

3. SPECIAL CHARGES

As a result of the HALEU letter agreement in the second quarter of 2019, special charges in 2019 included a credit of $2.9 million for the reversal of accrued termination benefits for employees who were retained at the Company’s facility in Piketon, Ohio. For 2018, special charges totaled $2.2 million, consisting of estimated employee termination benefits relatedrequest, the case was dismissed. Refer to corporate functions of $2.1 millionNote 16, Commitments and advisory costs related to updating the Company’s information technology systems of $0.1 million. The remaining balance of termination benefits of $1.4 million is expected to be paid within twelve months and is classified in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

A summary of termination benefit activity and the accrued liability follows (in millions):Contingencies - Legal Matters.
90


  
Liability
December 31,
2018
 Year Ended 
 December 31, 2019
 
Liability
December 31,
2019
   Charges (Credits) for Termination Benefits 
Paid/
Settled
 
Workforce reductions:        
Corporate functions $0.9
 $1.0
 $(0.7) $1.2
Piketon facility 3.2
 (2.9) (0.1) 0.2
Total $4.1
 $(1.9) $(0.8) $1.4




4.3. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH


The following table summarizes the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as presented on the consolidated balance sheet to amounts on the consolidated statement of cash flows (in millions):
December 31,
20212020
Cash and cash equivalents$193.8 $152.0 
Deposits for financial assurance - current0.2 0.2 
Deposits for financial assurance - non current2.8 5.7 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$196.8 $157.9 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Cash and cash equivalents$130.7
 $123.1
Deposits for financial assurance - current0.2
 30.3
Deposits for financial assurance - noncurrent5.7
 6.3
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$136.6
 $159.7


The following table provides additional detail regarding the Company’s deposits for financial assurance (in millions):

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018CurrentLong-TermCurrentLong-Term
Current Long-Term Current Long-Term
Piketon facility obligations$
 $
 $30.1
 $
Workers compensation
 5.4
 
 6.0
Workers compensation$— $2.6 $— $5.4 
Other0.2
 0.3
 0.2
 0.3
Other0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 
Total deposits for financial assurance$0.2
 $5.7
 $30.3
 $6.3
Total deposits for financial assurance$0.2 $2.8 $0.2 $5.7 

Piketon Facility Obligations and Surety Bonds

Centrus leases facilities and related personal property in Piketon, Ohio from DOE. Centrus previously provided financial assurance in the form of surety bonds to DOE for lease turnover obligations and to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) for decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D”) obligations related to the facility. These surety bonds were fully cash collateralized by the Company. The Company completed its obligations and, in 2019, the financial assurance instruments were cancelled and the Company received the cash collateral totaling $30.5 million including interest.

Financial Assurance for Workers’ Compensation


The Company has provided financial assurance to states in which it was previously self-insured for workers’ compensation in accordance with each state’s requirements in the form of a surety bond or letters of creditdeposit that areis fully cash collateralized by the Company.Centrus. As each state determines that the likelihood of further workers’ compensation obligations related to the period of self-insurance is reduced, the surety bond or letters of credit aredeposit is subject to reduction and/or cancellation and the Company would receive the excess cash collateral. In 2019, the Company received $0.6 million as return of cash collateral related to the cancellation of a letter of credit.




5.4. INVENTORIES


Centrus holds uranium at licensed locations in the form of natural uranium and as the uranium component of LEU. Centrus also holds SWU as the SWU component of LEU at licensed locations (e.g., fabricators) to meet book transfer requests by customers. Fabricators process LEU into fuel for use in nuclear reactors. Components of inventories are as follows (in millions):
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
 Current
Assets
Current
Liabilities
(a)
Inventories, NetCurrent
Assets
Current
Liabilities
(a)
Inventories, Net
Separative work units$8.8 $— $8.8 $17.0 $4.6 $12.4 
Uranium82.3 8.4 73.9 47.8 0.3 47.5 
Total$91.1 $8.4 $82.7 $64.8 $4.9 $59.9 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 
Current
Assets
 
Current
Liabilities
(a)
 Inventories, Net 
Current
Assets
 
Current
Liabilities
(a)
 Inventories, Net
Separative work units$7.8
 $
 $7.8
 $20.1
 $3.6
 $16.5
Uranium56.7
 5.6
 51.1
 109.6
 99.4
 10.2
Total$64.5
 $5.6
 $58.9
 $129.7
 $103.0
 $26.7


(a)Inventories owed to customers and suppliers, included in current liabilities, include SWU and uranium inventories owed to fabricators.

(a)Inventories owed to customers and suppliers, included in current liabilities, include SWU and uranium inventories owed to fabricators.

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Valuation adjustments for uraniumIn 2021, there was a valuation adjustment to reflect an update of projected timing and sources of inventory to reflect declines in uranium market price indicators totaled $2.3 million in 2019.be used for repayment of borrowed SWU inventory. There were no valuation adjustments in 2018.2020. For details, refer to Note 1,Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesContract LiabilitiesLEU Segment.


In March 2019,
91


The Company may also borrow SWU from customers, in which case the Company completedwill record the SWU and the related liability for the borrowing using a one-timeprojected average purchase price over the borrowing period. In 2018 through 2020 the Company borrowed SWU inventory valued at $20.7 million from a customer under an agreement signed in 2017 and recorded the SWU and the related liability using the Company’s average unit price of SWU and uranium from Nuclear Fuel Industries, Ltd. (“NFI”)purchases under contract projected to be used for $7.1repayment. The loan is repayable only with SWU. The cumulative liability to the customer for borrowed inventory was revalued to $25.5 million pursuant toin the third quarter of 2021.The revaluation reflected an August 2018 agreement between Enrichment Corp. and NFI. Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation (“TANE”) holds 718,200 sharesupdated projection of the Company’s Class B common stocktiming and certainsources of inventory to be used for repayment. In the Company’s 8.25% senior notes due 2027. Eachfourth quarter of NFI2021, the Company repaid borrowed SWU inventory valued at $3.1 million to a customer and TANE are wholly-owned, indirect subsidiariesreduced the SWU and the related liability using an average purchase price over the borrowing period. The remaining liability to the customer of Toshiba Corporation.$22.4 million for borrowed inventory is included in Other Long-Term Liabilities. Cost of Sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, includes the related expense of $4.8 million.


6.
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT


A summary of changes in property, plant and equipment follows (in millions):
December 31,
2020
Additions / (Depreciation)December 31,
2021
Land$1.2 $— $1.2 
Buildings and leasehold improvements3.9 0.7 4.6 
Machinery and equipment1.4 — 1.4 
Other1.1 — 1.1 
Property, plant and equipment, gross7.6 0.7 8.3 
Accumulated depreciation(2.7)(0.3)(3.0)
Property, plant and equipment, net$4.9 $0.4 $5.3 
 December 31,
2018
 Additions / (Depreciation) December 31,
2019
Land$1.2
 $
 $1.2
Leasehold improvements2.5
 
 2.5
Machinery and equipment1.0
 0.1
 1.1
Other1.1
 
 1.1
Property, plant and equipment, gross5.8
 0.1
 5.9
Accumulated depreciation(1.6) (0.6) (2.2)
Property, plant and equipment, net$4.2
 $(0.5) $3.7


Depreciation expense was $0.6 million in 2019 and $0.8 million in 2018.

The Company sold fully-depreciated property for $0.7 million in 2019 and $0.4 million in 2018. Cash proceeds received totaled $0.7 million in 20192021 and $0.5 million in 2018, including $0.1 million received in 2018 for sales occurring in 2017.2020.





7.
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS


Intangible assets originated from the Company’s reorganization and application of fresh start accounting as of September 30, 2014, the date the Company emerged from bankruptcy, and reflect the conditions at that time. The intangible asset related to the sales order book is amortized as the order book existing at emergence is reduced, principally as a result of deliveries to customers. The intangible asset related to customer relationships is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated average useful life of 15 years. Amortization expense is presented below gross profit on the consolidated statements of operations. Intangible asset balances are as follows (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet AmountGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Amount
Sales order book$54.6 $35.5 $19.1 $54.6 $32.0 $22.6 
Customer relationships68.9 33.3 35.6 68.9 28.7 40.2 
Total$123.5 $68.8 $54.7 $123.5 $60.7 $62.8 


92

 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Amount
Sales order book$54.6
 $29.9
 $24.7
 $54.6
 $28.0
 $26.6
Customer relationships68.9
 24.1
 44.8
 68.9
 19.5
 49.4
Total$123.5
 $54.0
 $69.5
 $123.5
 $47.5
 $76.0



The amount of amortization expense for intangible assets in each of the succeeding years is estimated to be as follows (in millions):
2022$9.5 
20236.6 
20248.6 
20257.6 
20269.9 
Thereafter12.5 
   Total$54.7 

2020$7.0
20217.6
202210.5
20237.2
20248.0
Thereafter29.2
   Total$69.5

8.7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES


Components of accounts payable and accrued liabilities follow (in millions):
December 31,
20212020
Trade payables$4.9 $4.9 
Compensation and employee benefits23.1 22.2 
Postretirement health and life benefit obligations - current7.0 11.6 
Accrued HALEU Contract loss0.5 7.0 
Operating lease liability0.9 2.4 
Other accrued liabilities1.4 2.5 
   Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities$37.8 $50.6 


 December 31,
 2019 2018
    
Trade payables$7.0
 $3.9
Postretirement health and life benefit obligations - current14.2
 15.4
Compensation and employee benefits13.1
 22.4
Accrued HALEU contract loss - current10.0
 
Operating lease liability2.5
 
Severance1.4
 4.1
Accrued interest on 8% PIK Toggle Notes
 0.6
Other accrued liabilities2.5
 6.0
   Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities$50.7
 $52.4




9.8. DEBT


A summary of debt follows (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
MaturityCurrentLong-TermCurrentLong-Term
8.25% Notes:Feb. 2027
Principal$— $74.3 $— $74.3 
Interest6.1 27.5 6.1 33.7 
Total$6.1 $101.8 $6.1 $108.0 
   December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Maturity Current Long-Term Current Long-Term
8.25% Notes:Feb. 2027        
Principal  $
 $74.3
 $
 $74.3
Interest  6.1
 39.8
 6.1
 45.9
8.25% Notes  $6.1
 $114.1
 $6.1
 $120.2
          
8% PIK Toggle Notes
Sep. 2019 
 $
 $
 $26.7
 $
          
Total  $6.1
 $114.1
 $32.8
 $120.2


Repayment of 8% PIK Toggle Notes

On September 30, 2019, the Company repaid the outstanding 8% PIK Toggle Notes that matured on September 30, 2019. The Company paid a total of $28.5 million, including $1.0 million in accrued interest. The payment was made in accordance with the terms of the Indenture dated September 30, 2014 (as amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time) among the Company, Enrichment Corp., as the note guarantor, and Delaware Trust Company, as trustee and collateral agent. The payment constituted full satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture and the Notes.

Interest on the 8% PIK Toggle Notes was payable semi-annually in arrears on March 31 and September 30 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The principal amount was increased by any payment of interest in the form of PIK payments. The Company had the option to pay up to 5.5% per annum of interest due on the 8% PIK Toggle Notes in the form of in-kind PIK payments. For the semi-annual interest periods in 2018 and 2019, the Company elected to pay interest in the form of PIK payments at 5.5% per annum. Financing costs for the issuance of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes were deferred and were amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the life of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes. The remaining financing costs were amortized with the final payment on September 30, 2019.

December 2018 Note Exchange

On December 6, 2018, Centrus entered into Exchange Agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with certain holders of the Company’s outstanding 8% PIK Toggle Notes. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreements, the Company exchanged $6.3 million aggregate principal amount of 8% PIK Toggle Notes for 398,638 shares of Class A Common Stock and approximately $5.1 million in cash, which included accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes. The Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of $0.5 million, which is net of transaction costs and previously deferred costs related to the 8% PIK Toggle Notes of less than $0.1 million. Refer to Note 15, Stockholders’ Equity for details related to the Common Stock.

8.25% Notes

Interest on the 8.25% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears as of February 28 and August 31 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The 8.25% Notes mature on February 28, 2027. As describedshown in the table above, all future interest payment obligations on the 8.25% Notes are included in the carrying value of the 8.25% Notes. As a result, the Company’s reported interest expense will be less than its contractual interest payments throughout the term of the 8.25% Notes. As of December 31, 2019,2021, and December 31, 2018,2020, $6.1 million of interest is recorded as current and classified as Current Debt in the consolidated balance sheet.


The 8.25% Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness other than its Issuer Senior Debt and our Limited Secured Acquisition Debt (each as defined below). The 8.25% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness and to certain limited secured acquisition indebtedness of the Company (the “Limited Secured Acquisition Debt”). The Limited Secured Acquisition Debt includes (i) any indebtedness, the proceeds of which are used to finance all or a portion of an acquisition or similar transaction if any lender’s lien is solely limited to the assets acquired in such a transaction and (ii) any indebtedness, the proceeds of which are used to finance all or a
93


portion of the American Centrifuge project or another next generation enrichment technology if any lender’s lien is solely limited to such assets, provided that a lien securing the 8.25% Notes that is junior with respect to the lien securing such indebtedness will be limited to the assets acquired with such Limited Secured Acquisition Debt.


The 8.25% Notes are subordinated in right of payment to certain indebtedness and obligations of the Company, as described in the indenture governing the 8.25% Notes Indenture (the “Issuer Senior Debt”), including (i) any indebtedness of the Company (inclusive of any indebtedness of Enrichment Corp.) under a future credit facility up to $50 million with a maximum net borrowing of $40 million after taking into account any minimum cash balance (unless a higher amount is approved with the consent of the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.25% Notes then outstanding), (ii) any revolving credit facility to finance inventory purchases and related working capital needs, and (iii) any indebtedness of the Company to Enrichment Corp. under the secured intercompany notes.


The 8.25% Notes are guaranteed on a subordinated and limited basis by, and secured by substantially all of the assets of, Enrichment Corp. The Enrichment Corp. guarantee is a secured obligation and ranks equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness of Enrichment Corp. (other than Designated Senior Claims (as defined below) and Limited Secured Acquisition Debt) and senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of Enrichment Corp. and Limited Secured Acquisition Debt. The Enrichment Corp. guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to certain obligations of, and claims against, Enrichment Corp. described in the indenture governing the 8.25% Notes Indenture (collectively, the “Designated Senior Claims”), including obligations and claims:
under a future credit facility up to $50 million with a maximum net borrowing of $40 million after taking into account any minimum cash balance;
under any revolving credit facility to finance inventory purchases and related working capital needs;
held by or for the benefit of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) pursuant to any settlement (including any required funding of pension plans); and
under surety bonds or similar obligations held by or on behalf of the U.S. government pursuant to regulatory requirements.


The lien securing the Enrichment Corp. guarantee of the 8.25% Notes is junior in priority with respect to the lien securing Limited Secured Acquisition Debt, which is limited to the assets acquired with such Limited Secured Acquisition Debt.




10.9. LEASES


Centrus leases facilities and equipment under operating leases. Lease expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has facility leases with terms greater than 12 months, and the Company records the related asset and obligation at the present value of lease payments over the term. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for information regarding the Company’s adoption of Topic 842 on January 1, 2019.


Lease assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Lease assets exclude lease incentives. Lease terms reflect options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that those options will be exercised. The depreciable life of lease assets and leasehold improvements is limited by the expected lease term. The weighted-average remaining lease term was 3.65.3 years at December 31, 2019,2021, with maturity dates ranging from July 2021December 31, 2025 to September 2027, and the weighted-average discount rate was 12.1%12.5%. Lease expense amounted to $2.7totaled a credit of $0.5 million in 2021 and expense of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Lease expense was $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. Lease expense primarily related to operating leases and for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2020 includes a $0.5$2.0 million and $0.3 million credit, respectively, from DOE for true uptrue-up of prior yearyears’ lease expense. Other amounts related to short-term lease expense were insignificant. Operating lease expense is included in Cost of Sales, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and Advance Technology Costs on the Statement of Operations. Cash paid for amounts included in operating cash flows for operating leases was $2.9$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.

94



The Company leases facilities and related personal property innear Piketon, Ohio from DOE. On May 31, 2019, in connection with the HALEU letter agreement, DOE and the Company amended theunder a lease agreement, which was scheduled to expire by its terms on June 30, 2019.is classified as operating. The lease was renewedamended on May 6, 2021, resulting in a decrease in the monthly lease payment beginning with the June 2021 payment. The Company accounted for the amendment as a modification and extended untilremeasured the remaining future lease payments through May 31, 2022, provided, however, thatresulting in the recording of a $1.0 million reduction in lease assets and liabilities. In September 2021, the lease was extended through December 31, 2025. The Company did not remeasure the lease as under the terms of the lease amendment it may be terminated early upon completion of the work under the HALEU Contract.Contract which is expected to occur by June 1, 2022. Any facilities, centrifuges or other equipment constructed or installed under contract with DOE will be owned by DOE and may be returned to DOE in an “as is” condition at the end of the lease term, and DOE would be responsible for its D&D. The Company accounted for the amendment as a modification and reassessed its classification. The Company classified the lease as an operating lease as the lease does not contain a transfer of ownership or purchase option, the fair value of the underlying asset cannot be practicably determined, and the economic life of the asset is indeterminate. The remeasurement of the remaining future lease payments through May 31, 2022 resulted in the recording of $3.8 million of additional lease assets and liabilities related to the modification. The modification resulted in an insignificant impact on the consolidated statement of operations. On October 8, 2019 the DOE notified the Company of an increase in the monthly lease payment beginning with the October 2019 payment. The Company accounted for the amendment as a modification and reassessed its classification. The remeasurement of the remaining future lease payments through May 31, 2022 resulted in the recording of $1.4 million additional lease assets and liabilities related to the modification.

Centrus had a lease with DOE for centrifuge testing facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee through December 2019. In connection with the completion of work performed for D&D of the facility, the Company terminated the lease on September 30, 2019. The Company derecognized the remaining lease asset and related liability of $0.2 million. There was no gain or loss associated with the termination of the lease.




Operating Lease Assets and Liabilities


The table below presents the lease-related assets and liabilities recorded on the consolidated balance sheet (in millions).
December 31, 2021Classification on the Balance Sheet
Lease assets$2.1 Other long-term assets
Lease liabilities:
Current$0.9 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Non-current3.0 Other long-term liabilities
Total lease liabilities$3.9 
 December 31, 2019 Classification on the Balance Sheet
Lease assets$7.2
 Other long-term assets
Lease liabilities:   
Current2.5
 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Noncurrent7.0
 Other long-term liabilities
Total lease liabilities$9.5
 


Maturity of Operating Lease Liabilities


The table below reconciles undiscounted payments for operating leases with terms greater than 12 months to the operating lease liabilities recorded on the balance sheet (in millions).
2022$1.3 
20231.0 
20241.0 
20251.0 
20261.0 
Thereafter0.8 
Total lease payments6.1 
Less imputed interest2.2 
Present value of lease payments$3.9 


2020$3.2
20213.2
20221.9
20231.0
20241.0
Thereafter2.8
Total lease payments13.1
Less imputed interest3.6
Present value of lease payments$9.5

Minimum Lease Payments

Prior to the adoption of Topic 842, future estimated minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2018 for leases with remaining terms in excess of one year were as follows (in millions):
2019$0.9
20200.9
20210.9
20221.0
20231.0
Thereafter3.8
 $8.5



11.10. FAIR VALUE


Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, the following hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:
Level 1 assets include investments with quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.markets that the Company has the ability to liquidate as of the reporting date.

Level 2 assets include investments in U.S. government agency securities, corporate and municipal debt whose estimates are valued based on observable inputs, other than quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.prices.
95



Level 3 assets include investments with unobservable inputs, such as third party valuations, derived using onedue to little or more significant inputs that are not observable.no market activity.


Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value (in millions):
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:               Assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents$130.7
 $
 $
 $130.7
 $123.1
 $
 $
 $123.1
Cash and cash equivalents$193.8 $— $— $193.8 $152.0 $— $— $152.0 
Deferred compensation asset (a)1.8
 
 
 1.8
 1.4
 
 
 1.4
Deferred compensation asset (a)3.2 — — 3.2 2.4 — — 2.4 
               
Liabilities:   
    
    
    
Liabilities:        
Deferred compensation obligation (a)$1.8
 $
 $
 $1.8
 $1.4
 $
 $
 $1.4
Deferred compensation obligation (a)$3.2 $— $— $3.2 $2.3 $— $— $2.3 
 
(a)The deferred compensation obligation represents the balance of deferred compensation plus net investment earnings. The deferred compensation plan is funded through a rabbi trust. Trust funds are invested in mutual funds for which unit prices are quoted in active markets and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

(a)    The deferred compensation obligation represents the balance of deferred compensation plus net investment earnings. The deferred compensation plan is funded through a rabbi trust. Trust funds are invested in mutual funds for which unit prices are quoted in active markets and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the periods presented.


Other Financial Instruments


As of December 31, 2019,2021, and December 31, 2018,2020, the consolidated balance sheet carrying amounts for Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities (excluding the deferred compensation obligation described above), and Payables under SWU Purchase Agreements approximate fair value because of their short-term nature.


The carrying value and estimated fair value of long-term debt are as follows (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value (a)
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value (a)
8.25% Notes$107.9 (b)$74.3 $114.1 (b)$68.6 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Carrying Value 
Estimated Fair Value (a)
 Carrying Value 
Estimated Fair Value (a)
8.25% Notes$120.2
(b) 
$61.5
 $126.3
(b) 
$57.9
8% PIK Toggle Notes
 
 26.7
 21.8
(a) Based on recent trading prices and bid/ask quotes as of or near the balance sheet date, which are considered Level 2 inputs based on the frequency of trading.
(b)
The carrying value of the 8.25% Notes consists of the principal balance of $74.3 million and the sum of current and noncurrent interest payment obligations until maturity. Refer to Note 9, Debt.



(b)    The carrying value of the 8.25% Notes consists of the principal balance of $74.3 million and the sum of current and non-current interest payment obligations until maturity. Refer to Note 8, Debt.
12.
11. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH AND LIFE BENEFITS


There are approximately 5,0003,500 employees and retirees covered by qualified defined benefit pension plans providing retirement benefits based on compensation and years of service, and approximately 3,1002,300 employees and retirees covered by postretirement health and life benefit plans. DOE retained the obligation for postretirement health and life benefits for workers who retired prior to July 28, 1998. Pursuant to non-qualified supplemental pension plans, Centrus provides certain executive officers additional retirement benefits in excess of qualified plan limits imposed by tax law based on a targeted benefit objective. Employees hired on or after September 1, 2008, who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides for participation do not participate in a qualified defined benefit pension plan or postretirement health and life benefit plans.


96


Changes in the projected benefit obligations and plan assets and the funded status of the plans follow:
Defined Benefit Pension PlansPostretirement Health
and Life Benefit Plans
($ millions)Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2021202020212020
Changes in Benefit Obligations:
Obligations at beginning of period$757.9 $763.5 $142.4 $152.8 
Actuarial (gains) losses, net(28.7)56.7 (2.3)(1.6)
Service costs2.7 3.5 — — 
Interest costs18.1 24.3 3.4 4.8 
Benefits paid from Plan assets(51.3)(56.3)(12.4)(13.6)
Benefits paid from Company assets(0.4)(0.5)— — 
Settlements— (30.4)— — 
Administrative expenses paid(2.1)(2.9)— — 
Obligations at end of period696.2 757.9 131.1 142.4 
Changes in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period633.1 621.2 — — 
Actual return on plan assets57.8 85.4 — — 
Company contributions35.7 16.6 21.5 13.6 
Benefits paid(51.7)(56.8)(12.3)(13.6)
Settlements— (30.4)— — 
Administrative expenses paid(2.2)(2.9)— — 
Fair value of plan assets at end of period672.7 633.1 9.2 — 
Unfunded status at end of period$(23.5)$(124.8)$(121.9)$(142.4)
Amounts recognized in assets and liabilities:
      Current liabilities$(0.4)$(0.4)$(7.0)$(11.6)
      Non-current liabilities(23.1)(124.4)(114.9)(130.8)
$(23.5)$(124.8)$(121.9)$(142.4)
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax:
      Prior service credit$(0.9)$(1.1)$(2.0)$(2.1)
 Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
Postretirement Health
and Life Benefit Plans
($ millions)Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Changes in Benefit Obligations:       
Obligations at beginning of period$733.8
 $817.9
 $151.6
 $170.7
Actuarial (gains) losses, net59.8
 (50.8) 9.1
 (13.1)
Service costs3.3
 3.4
 
 
Interest costs30.3
 28.7
 6.0
 5.8
Benefits paid(55.9) (57.5) (13.9) (11.8)
Lump sum benefits paid(3.2) (4.8) 
 
Plan amendments(1.3) 
 
 
Administrative expenses paid(3.3) (3.1) 
 
Obligations at end of period763.5
 733.8
 152.8
 151.6
Changes in Plan Assets:       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period563.5
 654.6
 
 1.8
Actual return on plan assets109.3
 (40.2) 
 
Company contributions10.8
 14.5
 13.9
 10.0
Benefits paid(55.9) (57.5) (13.9) (11.8)
Lump sum benefits paid(3.2) (4.8) 
 
Administrative expenses paid(3.3) (3.1) 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of period621.2
 563.5
 
 
Unfunded status at end of period$(142.3) $(170.3) $(152.8) $(151.6)
        
Amounts recognized in assets and liabilities:       
      Current liabilities$(0.5) $(1.4) (14.2) (15.4)
      Noncurrent liabilities(141.8) (168.9) (138.6) (136.2)
 $(142.3) $(170.3) $(152.8) $(151.6)
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax:       
      Prior service cost (credit)$(1.3) $
 $(2.3) $(2.4)
        
Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations at end of period:3.3% 4.3% 3.3% 4.3%




The current liabilities reflect expected contributions for benefit payments for the non-qualified plans and the postretirement health and life benefit plans in the following year.


The discount rates above,below, rounded to the nearest 0.1%, are the estimated rates at which the benefit obligations could be effectively settled on the measurement date and are based on yields of high quality fixed income investments whose cash flows match the timing and amount of expected benefit payments of the plans.


Plan assets and benefit obligations are remeasured each year as of the balance sheet date resulting in differences between actual and projected results for the year. These actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the statement of operations in the fourth quarter. In addition, an interim remeasurement and recognition of gains or losses may be required for a plan during the year when lump sum payments exceed, or are expected to exceed, the sum of the service cost and interest cost components of the annual net periodic benefit cost for that plan for the current year. There were no interim remeasurements in 20192021 and 2018.2020.


97



The defined benefit pension plans currently allow for a lump sum payment option to (a) active employees who are terminated as a result of Company reductions in force and (b) periodically to terminated vested participants. In March 2019, the lump sum payment option was made permanent to those terminated vested participants who have not yet begun receiving their benefits and have been terminated as a result of a reduction in force by the Company, or due to voluntary termination or involuntary termination, other than involuntary termination as a termination for cause.


As part of the Company’s continued effort to reduce the size and volatility of its pension obligations and administrative costs, the Company transferred approximately $30.4 million of pension plan assets and approximately $30.4 million of related benefit obligations to an insurance company through the purchase of a group annuity contract in the fourth quarter of 2020.

Projected benefit obligations are based on actuarial assumptions including possible future increases in compensation. Accumulated benefit obligations are based on actuarial assumptions but do not include possible future increases in compensation. Effective August 2013, accrued benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are fixed and no longer increase to reflect changes in compensation or company service. Therefore, the accumulated benefit obligation equaled the projected benefit obligation of $763.5$696.2 million and $733.8$757.9 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. As of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, none of Centrus’ plans had fair value of plan assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligations.




Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)


The Company reports service costs for its defined benefit pension plans and its postretirement health and life benefit plans in Cost of Sales and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The remaining components of net periodic benefit credits (costs)(credits) costs are reported as Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income).Income.
Defined Benefit Pension PlansPostretirement Health
and Life Benefit Plans
(in millions)Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2021202020212020
Net Periodic Benefit (Credits) Costs
Service costs$2.7 $3.5 $— $— 
Interest costs18.1 24.3 3.4 4.8 
Expected return on plan assets(38.3)(37.5)— — 
Amortization of prior service credits, net(0.2)(0.2)(0.1)(0.1)
Actuarial (gains) losses, net(48.2)8.9 (2.3)(1.7)
Net periodic benefit (credits) costs$(65.9)$(1.0)$1.0 $3.0 
 Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
Postretirement Health
and Life Benefit Plans
(in millions)Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Net Periodic Benefit (Credits) Costs       
Service costs$3.3
 $3.4
 $
 $
Interest costs30.3
 28.7
 6.0
 5.8
Expected return on plan assets (gains)(36.4) (41.0) 
 
Amortization of prior service costs (credits), net
 
 (0.1) (0.2)
Actuarial (gains) losses, net(13.1) 30.4
 9.1
 (13.1)
Net periodic benefit (credits) costs$(15.9) $21.5
 $15.0
 $(7.5)


Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Amortization of prior service costs, net$— $— $(2.0)$(2.1)
Prior service credit(0.9)(1.1)  
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss, pre-tax$(0.9)$(1.1)$(2.0)$(2.1)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs (income) and other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax$(66.8)$(2.1)$(1.0)$0.9 
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)       
Amortization of prior service (costs) credits, net$
 $
 $0.1
 $0.2
Prior service cost/(credit)(1.3) 
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax$(1.3) $
 $0.1
 $0.2
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs (income) and other comprehensive income (loss), pre-tax$(17.2) $21.5
 $15.1
 $(7.3)


Net periodic benefit costs include service and interest costs of providing pension benefits that are accrued over the years employees render service. Prior service costs or credits are amortized over the employees’ average remaining years of service from age 40 until the date of full benefit eligibility or the average expected future lifetime of all plan participants, as applicable. Participants in the postretirement health and life benefit plans are generally eligible for benefits at retirement after age 50 with 10 years of continuous credited service at the time of retirement.


98


On September 7, 2021, the Company collected $43.5 million from DOE, of which $33.8 million was contributed to the pension plan in September 2021 for its subsidiary Enrichment Corp. and $9.7 million was deposited in October 2021 in a trust for payment of postretirement health benefits payable by Enrichment Corp. Refer to Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies and Note 2, Revenue And Contracts with Customers.

Effective January 1, 2014, or for certain plan participants formerly represented by a collective bargaining unit, January 1, 2015, plan participants age 65 or older (“post-65”) have access to a range of medical plan choices with varying costs and benefits through a Medicare Exchange implemented by the Company. The Company provides an annual stipend for each of the post-65 retirees and post-65 spouses who enroll in the coverage through the exchange. Depending on the level of benefits elected by the participant, the participant may be required to make contributions in excess of the stipend amount.


The transition to the post-65 Medicare Exchange was reflected as a plan amendment that reduced plan obligations by $6.8 million as of December 31, 2014. This reduction in obligation was recognized in other comprehensive income in 2014 as a prior service credit. The prior service credit is being amortized into net periodic benefit cost as a credit over time. The post-65 Medicare Exchange stipend amount was increased for 2017. This increase in obligation of $3.6 million as of December 31, 2016, was recognized in other comprehensive income in 2016 as a prior service cost and is being amortized into net periodic benefit cost over time. The post-65 Medicare Exchange stipend amount was increased in 2018, as specified in a settlement agreement with the former collective bargaining unit. The settlement agreement also specifies the addition of catastrophic drug coverage effective January 1, 2019. The benefit enhancement for 2019 has been applied to all post-65 participants regardless of past representation by the collective bargaining agreement. The increase in obligation of $10.0 million as a result of the settlement agreement was recognized in net periodic benefit costs in 2017 as a plan change resulting from a legal settlement and is reported in Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income)Income.




The defined benefits pension plans were amended in March 2019 making permanent the option for pension-eligible employees to receive a lump sum payment upon termination, regardless of benefit size, which decreased plan obligations by $1.3 million. The effect of these plan changes havehas been added to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as an unrecognized prior service cost to be amortized over the average future service of active employees starting in 2020.


Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Costs
Defined Benefit Pension PlansPostretirement Health
and Life Benefit Plans
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2021202020212020
Discount rate2.8%2.5%2.8%2.5%
Expected return on plan assets6.3%6.4%
 Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
Postretirement Health
and Life Benefit Plans
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Discount rate3.3% 4.3% 3.3% 4.3%
Expected return on plan assets6.8% 6.8%  


The expected return on plan assets is based on the weighted average of long-term return expectations for the composition of the plans’ equity and debt securities. Expected returns on equity securities are based on historical long-term returns of equity markets. Expected returns on debt securities are based on the current interest rate environment.


Healthcare cost trend rates used to measure postretirement health benefit obligations follow:
December 31,
20212020
Healthcare cost trend rate for the following year6.0%5.5%
Long-term rate that the healthcare cost trend rate gradually declines to5%5%
Year that the healthcare cost trend rate is expected to reach the long-term rate20262022
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Healthcare cost trend rate for the following year6.0% 6.0%
Long-term rate that the healthcare cost trend rate gradually declines to5% 5%
Year that the healthcare cost trend rate is expected to reach the long-term rate2022 2021

A one-percentage-point change in the assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have an effect on the postretirement health benefit obligation and costs as follows:
99

(in millions)One-Percentage Point
 Increase Decrease
Postretirement health benefit obligation$3.5
 $(3.0)
Net periodic benefit costs (service and interest cost components only)$0.1
 $(0.1)


Benefit Plan Assets


Independent advisors manage investment assets of Centrus’ defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health and life benefit plans. Centrus has the fiduciary responsibility for reviewing performance of the various investment advisors. The goal of the investment policy of the plans is to maximize portfolio returns within reasonable and prudent levels of risk in order to meet projected liabilities and maintain sufficient cash to make timely payments of all participant benefits. Risk is reduced by diversifying plan assets and following a strategic asset allocation approach. Additionally, as the plans are frozen and funding status has improved, the Company has shifted the investment allocations to lower risk investments in order to minimize market exposure and will continue to do so based upon approved funding milestones. Asset classes and target weights are adjusted periodically to optimize the long-term portfolio risk/return tradeoff,trade off, to provide liquidity for benefit payments, and to align portfolio risk with the underlying obligations. The investment policy of the plans prohibits the use of leverage, direct investments in tangible assets, or any investment prohibited by applicable laws or regulations.




The allocation of plan assets between equity and debt securities and the target allocation range by asset category for the defined benefit pension plans follows:
December 31,
202120202022 Target
Equity securities45 %52 %40 -45%
Debt securities51 %42 %50 -55%
Cash%%0-5%
100 %100 %
 December 31,  
 2019 2018 2020 Target
Equity securities48% 48% 40-60%
Debt securities49% 49% 40-60%
Cash3% 3% 0-5%
 100% 100%    



Prefunding for the postretirement health and life benefit plans was discontinued in 2012 and the remaining assets were expended in early 2018. Benefit costs of the postretirement health and life benefit plans are funded as costs are incurred.

Plan assets are measured at fair value. Following are the plan investments as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, categorized by the fair value hierarchy levels described in Note 11,10, Fair Value Measurements:
Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Benefit Plans
(in millions)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
20212020202120202021202020212020
U.S. government securities$— $— $13.0 $16.4 $— $— 13.0 $16.4 
Corporate debt— — 56.4 104.2 — — 56.4 104.2 
Municipal bonds and non-U.S. government securities— — 1.7 2.1 — — 1.7 2.1 
Mutual funds (b)582.9 — — — — — 582.9 — 
Mortgage and asset backed securities— — 7.9 6.4 — — 7.9 6.4 
Fair value of investments by hierarchy level$582.9 $ $79.0 $129.1 $ $ 661.9129.1
Investments measured at NAV (a)20.1 504.4 
Accrued interest receivable1.2 1.3 
Unsettled transactions(1.4)(1.8)
Plan assets$681.8 $633.0 
 Defined Benefit Pension Plans
(in millions)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
U.S. government securities$
 $
 $32.7
 $34.6
 $
 $
 $32.7
 $34.6
Corporate debt
 
 121.1
 104.7
 
 
 121.1
 104.7
Municipal bonds and non-U.S. government securities
 
 2.1
 2.0
 
 
 2.1
 2.0
Mortgage and asset backed securities
 
 11.0
 4.2
 
 
 11.0
 4.2
Fair value of investments by hierarchy level$
 $
 $166.9
 $145.5
 $
 $
 $166.9
 $145.5
Investments measured at NAV (a)            453.5
 416.1
Accrued interest receivable            1.8
 1.8
Unsettled transactions            (1.0) 0.1
Plan assets            $621.2
 $563.5




(a) Equity, bond and money market investments held in collective trusts are valued based on the net asset value (“NAV”) provided by the administrator of the funds. The NAV for each fund is based on the underlying assets owned by the fund, less any expenses accrued against the fund, divided by the number of fund shares outstanding. While the underlying investments are traded on an exchange, the funds are not. Fair values for the collective trust investments are measured using the NAVs as a practical expedient and are not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.

(b) Postretirement Health and Life Benefit Plan assets of $9.2 million are all contained within Level 1 assets consist of mutual funds and money market funds having a publicly available NAV.funds.


Level 2 assets include investments in U.S. government agency securities, corporate and municipal debt that are valued based on estimated prices using observable, market-based inputs.



100



Benefit Plan Cash Flows


The Company expects to contribute $16.1$0 million to the qualified defined benefit pension plans, $0.5$0.4 million to the non-qualified defined benefit pension plans, and $14.2$7.0 million to the postretirement health and life benefit plans in 2020.2022. There is no required contribution for the postretirement health and life benefit plans under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”).


Estimated future benefit plan payments follow (in millions):
Defined Benefit Pension PlansPostretirement Health and Life Benefit Plans
2022$52.1 $11.2 
202351.0 10.7 
202449.1 10.1 
202547.6 9.5 
202647.6 9.0 
2027 to 2031214.0 36.3 
 Defined Benefit Pension Plans Postretirement Health and Life Benefit Plans
2020$57.2
 $14.2
202155.8
 13.0
202254.1
 12.4
202352.8
 11.9
202451.1
 11.1
2025 to 2029236.7
 45.4


Other Plans


The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan for employees. Employee contributions are matched at established rates. Amounts contributed are invested in a range of investment options available to participants and the funds are administered by an independent trustee. Matching cash contributions by the Company amounted to $1.7$2.0 million in 20192021 and $1.8$1.6 million in 2018.2020.


Under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, qualified employees may defer compensation on a tax-deferred basis subject to plan limitations. Any matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) plan that are foregone due to annual compensation limitations of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) are eligible to be received from the Company under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, provided that the employee deferred the maximum allowable pre-tax contribution in the 401(k) plan. The Company matching contributions amounted to less than $0.1 million in 20192021 and 2018.2020.














13.12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


The Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”) authorizes the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock units, restricted stock, notional stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other stock-based awards, as well as cash-based awards, to employees, officers, directors, and other individuals providing services to the Company or its affiliates. As disclosed in Note 15 - Stockholder’s Equity, in February 2021, the Company increased the available shares of Class A Common Stock under the Company’s 2014 Plan by an additional 700,000 shares. The plan currently authorizes the issuance of up to 1,200,0001,900,000 shares. As of December 31, 2021, there were 844,293 shares available for future awards.

In January 2019, the Company adopted the 2019 Executive Incentive Plan (“2019 Plan”), which is subject to the terms of the 2014 Plan, under which participating employees are eligible to receive grants of equity awards such as notional stock units and SARs. Under this plan, the Company has granted awards that are subject to either cliff-based or performance-based vesting. The cliff-based awards vest after three years of service. The performance-based awards vest if the company reaches or exceeds a pre-defined net income target for the three-year award term. Equity awards may be payable in common stock, cash, or a combination of both, at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Compensation costs for awards that are likely to be settled with cash payments are remeasured each reporting period based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock. These cumulative vested costs are accrued in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities or Other Long-Term Liabilities. Equity awards that are payable in stock are accounted for as equity and compensation costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
101



In 2019, under the 2014 Plan, the Company awarded notional stock units to participating executives for the three-year period ending December 31, 2021. As the original award, at grant date, was expected to be settled in cash, the Company had recorded cumulative compensation costs in Other Long-Term Liabilities at December 31, 2020. There were 206,183 notional stock units (two-thirds of these awards) paid in shares in April 2021, with the remainder anticipated to be paid in April 2022. As of March 31, 2021, the Company reclassified these shares to equity as the Board of Directors approved settlement in shares.

In 2020, the Company awarded participating executives notional stock units and stock appreciation rights for the three-year period ending April 26, 2023. These equity awards may be payable in common stock, cash, or a combination of both at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The cumulative vested costs have been accrued in Other Long-Term Liabilities as they are likely to be settled in cash.

In September 2021, the Company awarded participating executives notional stock units and SARs. The awards granted will be paid in shares on or before May 1, 2024, provided that a defined performance condition is achieved. In order to receive the award, the total cumulative net income as reported on the Company’s Form 10-Ks for the years ending December 31, 2021, 2022, and 2023 must be equal to or greater than $160 million. The grant date fair value of notional stock units is determined based on the closing price of Class A Common Stock. As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 422,000 shares available for future awards, including approximately 120,000 shares associated with awards that were terminated or cancelled without being exercised.

A summary of stock-based compensation costs (credits) follows (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
    
Restricted stock units$0.2
 $0.1
Stock options0.1
 0.3
Stock appreciation rights1.1
 
Total stock-based compensation costs (credits)$1.4
 $0.4
    
Total recognized tax benefit$
 $

Stock on the grant date. The total recognized tax benefit is reported at the federal statutory rate netgrant date fair value of the tax valuation allowance.SARs were determined based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company has concluded that it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved and therefore has recorded compensation cost. Compensation costs for these notional stock units and SARs are amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.


Compensation cost for restricted stock units and stock options is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there was $0.3$0.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for actual forfeitures, related to non-vested stock-based payments granted, of which $0.2$0.3 million relates to restricted stock optionsunits and $0.1 million relates to restricted stock units.options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2512 months. There were no stock options granted, exercised, or forfeited during

A summary of stock-based compensation costs is as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020
 
Notional stock units and stock appreciation rights$11.6 $6.6 
Restricted stock units0.5 0.4 
Stock options0.1 0.1 
Total stock-based compensation costs$12.2 $7.1 
Total recognized tax benefit$(1.5)$ 

The total recognized tax benefit is reported at the year ended December 31, 2018.

Stock appreciation rights for participating executives for the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, under the 2016 Executive Incentive Plan were paid in cash in 2019 totaling $1.0 million. Stock appreciation rights are a componentfederal statutory rate net of the 2019 Executive Incentive Plan with incentive awards targeted following the two-year period ending December 31, 2020 and the three-year period ending December 31, 2021. The stock appreciation rights, if awarded, may be payable in common stock, cash or a combination of both at the discretion of the tax valuation allowance.

Board of Directors. Compensation cost for stock appreciation rights is re-measured each reporting period based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock and is subject to adjustment based on the status of performance against performance goals.
Restricted Stock Units


Non-employee, independent directors are granted restricted stock units as part of their compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. Settlement of these restricted stock units is made in shares of Class A Common Stock only upon the director’s retirement or other end of service. The restricted stock units generally vest over one year; however, vesting is accelerated upon (1) the director attaining eligibility for retirement, (2) termination of the director’s service by reason of death or disability, or (3) a change in control. As of December 31, 2019,2021, approximately 215,000192,000 shares of restricted stock units could potentially be converted to Class A Common Stock once vested and settled.


102


The fair valuefollowing table summarizes Centrus’ board restricted stock units activity:
Shares (in thousands)Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share)
Nonvested at December 31, 201974$3.09
Granted47$10.38
Vested(74)$3.09
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 202047$10.38
Granted20$25.13
Vested(47)$10.38
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 202120$25.13

Employee Restricted Stock Units

In 2021, certain employees were granted restricted stock units as part of their compensation. Settlement of these restricted stock units is determined based on the closing pricemade in shares of Class A Common Stock on the grant date. Compensation cost forupon vesting. The restricted stock units is amortizedgenerally vest after three years. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 4,000 shares of restricted stock units could potentially be converted to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.Class A Common Stock once vested and settled.



The following table summarizes Centrus’s employee restricted stock units activity:

Shares
(in thousands)
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share)
Nonvested at December 31, 2020$—
Granted4$24.01
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 20214$24.01


Stock Options


The intrinsic value of an option, if any, represents the excess of the fair value of the common stock over the exercise price. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which includes a number of assumptions including Centrus’ estimates of stock price volatility, employee stock option exercise behaviors, future dividend payments, and risk-free interest rates.


The expected term of options granted is the estimated period of time from the beginning of the vesting period to the date of expected exercise or other settlement, based on historical exercises and post-vesting terminations. Centrus has estimated the expected term using the simplified method described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107/110, Topic 14, Share-Based Payment, due to the lack of historical exercise and post-vesting termination information available for the Company since its reorganization. Future stock price volatility is estimated based on the Company’s historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate for the expected option term is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. No cash dividends are expected in the foreseeable future and, therefore, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the option valuation model. The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur. Compensation expense is recognized for stock option awards that are expected to vest.


Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value option grants follow.
103


There were no option grants in the yearyears ended December 31, 2018.2021, and 2020.
Year Ended December 31,
2019
Options granted (in thousands)100
Risk-free interest rate1.62%
Expected volatility73%
Expected option life (years)6.5
Weighted-average grant date fair value$2.44



Stock options vest and become exercisable in equal annual installments over a three or four year period and expire ten years from the date of grant. A summary of stock option activity follows:
Stock Options (in thousands)Weighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in YearsAggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding at December 31, 2019518$4.026.2$1.5
Granted
Exercised(107)$3.43
Forfeited/Cancelled
Outstanding at December 31, 2020411$4.185.3$7.8
Granted
Exercised(217)$4.17
Forfeited/Cancelled
Outstanding at December 31, 2021194$4.184.4$8.9
Exercisable at December 31, 2021144$4.373.2$6.6
  Stock Options (thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value (millions)
         
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 425 $4.14 6.3 $—
Granted 100 $3.65    
Exercised (7) $3.93    
Forfeited/Cancelled       
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 518 $4.02 6.2 $1.5
Exercisable at December 31, 2019 418 $4.11 5.3 $1.2




Stock options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 2019, follow:2021, are as follows:

Stock Exercise PriceOptions Outstanding (thousands)Remaining Contractual Life in YearsOptions Exercisable (thousands)
$4.371443.2144
$3.65507.8

Stock Appreciation Rights - 2020 Award

The intrinsic value of a SAR, if any, represents the excess of the fair value of the common stock over the exercise price. The fair value of SAR awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which includes a number of assumptions including Centrus’ estimates of stock price volatility, expected term, future dividend payments, and risk-free interest rates.

These SARs generally have a defined term of three years from award and are automatically exercised at the end of its term. Future stock price volatility is estimated based on the Company’s historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. No cash dividends are expected in the foreseeable future and, therefore, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the valuation model.
104


Stock Exercise Price Options Outstanding (thousands) Remaining Contractual Life in Years Options Exercisable (thousands)
       
$5.62 15 4.9 15
$4.37 300 5.2 300
$3.90 23 5.6 23
$3.93 15 5.6 15
$2.71 50 5.8 50
$2.68 15 6.4 15
$3.65 100 9.8 


A summary of SARs with time-based vesting granted under the 2014 plan for the year ended December 31, 2021, are as follows:

14.
Stock Appreciation Rights (in thousands)Weighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in YearsAggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding at December 31, 2019$—$—
Granted83.5$5.53
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled
Outstanding at December 31, 202083.5$5.532.3$1.47
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled
Outstanding at December 31, 202183.5$5.531.3$3.71
Exercisable at December 31, 202183.5$5.531.3$3.71

The weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation models to determine the fair value of SARs granted to employees under the 2014 Plan are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
20212020
SARs Granted (in thousands)n/a83.5
Average Risk-Free Raten/a0.14%
Expected Volatilityn/a94%
Expected Term (Years)n/a2.3
Dividend Yieldn/a

Stock Appreciation Rights (Performance Condition) - 2021 Award

The intrinsic value of a SAR, if any, represents the excess of the fair value of the common stock over the exercise price. The fair value of SAR awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which includes a number of assumptions including Centrus’ estimates of stock price volatility, expected term, future dividend payments, and risk-free interest rates.

These SARs generally have a defined term of three years from award and are automatically exercised at the end of its term if the performance condition has been met. Future stock price volatility is estimated based on the Company’s historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. No cash dividends are expected in the foreseeable future and, therefore, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the valuation model.

105




A summary of SARs with performance-based vesting granted under the 2014 plan in the year ended December 31, 2021, are as follows:
Stock Appreciation Rights (Performance Condition) (in thousands)Weighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in YearsAggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding at December 31, 2020$—$—
Granted21$19.44
Exercised
Forfeited/Cancelled
Outstanding at December 31, 202121$19.442.3$0.64
Exercisable at December 31, 202121$19.442.3$0.64



The weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation models to determine the fair value of SARs granted to employees under the 2014 Plan are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Stock Appreciation Rights Granted (in thousands)21.0n/a
Average Risk-Free Rate0.3%n/a
Expected Volatility82.8%n/a
Expected Term (Years)2.5n/a
Dividend Yieldn/a

Notional Stock Units - 2019 and 2020 Awards

A summary of notional stock units with time-based vesting granted under the 2014 plan for the year ended December 31, 2021, are as follows:
Shares (thousands)Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share)
Nonvested at December 31, 2019468$3.16
Granted125$5.53
Vested
Forfeited(22)$3.16
Nonvested at December 31, 2020571$3.68
Granted
Vested(319)$3.16
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 2021252$4.33
106



Notional Stock Units (Performance Condition) - 2021 Award

A summary of notional stock units with performance-based vesting granted under the 2014 plan for the year ended December 31, 2021, are as follows:
Shares
(in thousands)
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share)
Nonvested at December 31, 2020— $— 
Granted10$39.55
Vested— — 
Forfeited— — 
Nonvested at December 31, 202110 $39.55


13. INCOME TAXES


Income Tax ExpenseBenefit


The components of income tax expense followbenefit is as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Current:
  Federal$— $— 
  State and local0.4 0.5 
  Foreign— — 
0.4 0.5 
Deferred:
  Federal (a)(40.7)— 
  State and local1.2 (1.9)
  Foreign— — 
(39.5)(1.9)
Income tax benefit$(39.1)$(1.4)

(a) The income tax benefit for 2021 includes the reversal of a portion of the federal valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets. See further discussion below.

107

 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Current:   
  Federal$
 $
  State and local0.2
 
  Foreign0.1
 
 0.3
 
Deferred:   
  Federal
 
  State and local
 
  Foreign
 
 
 
Income tax expense$0.3
 $




Deferred Taxes


Future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes and the Company’s estimate of the tax bases of its assets and liabilities result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, as follows (in millions):
December 31,
20212020
Deferred tax assets:
Employee benefits costs$36.2 $61.8 
Inventory18.6 16.2 
Property, plant and equipment191.5 193.8 
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards206.2 211.1 
Accrued expenses0.4 2.1 
Long-term debt and financing costs10.8 12.6 
Lease liability0.9 1.5 
Other0.2 0.2 
Deferred tax assets464.8 499.3 
Valuation allowance(414.7)(486.0)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance$50.1 $13.3 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets$7.9 $9.9 
Lease asset0.4 1.1 
Prepaid expenses0.4 0.4 
Deferred tax liabilities$8.7 $11.4 
Deferred tax assets, net$41.4 $1.9 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Employee benefits costs$65.3
 $73.6
Inventory17.8
 11.1
Property, plant and equipment182.3
 185.9
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards190.9
 187.1
Accrued expenses4.2
 0.9
Long-term debt and financing costs13.2
 15.3
Lease liability2.0
 
Other0.2
 0.2
Deferred tax assets475.9
 474.1
Valuation allowance(459.5) (456.6)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance$16.4
 $17.5
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Intangible assets$14.7
 $16.0
Lease asset1.5
 
Prepaid expenses0.2
 1.5
Deferred tax liabilities$16.4
 $17.5
 $
 $


The valuation allowance reduces the net deferred tax assets to their net realizable value. There is a full valuation allowance against net deferred taxes due to annual operating losses since 2011 and substantial uncertainty to generate future taxable income that would lead toThe ultimate realization of the net deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in future years when deferred tax assets are recoverable or are expected to reverse.

The Company has maintained a full valuation allowance against federal and state net deferred tax assets since the fourth quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2020. In the second quarter of 2020, the Company released the valuation allowance against the state net deferred tax assets for the LEU segment that are more likely than not to be realized.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company released $40.7 million of the valuation allowance against federal net deferred taxes that are more likely than not to be realized. Centrus evaluated both positive and negative evidence that was objectively verifiable to determine the amount of the federal valuation allowance that is required on Centrus’ federal deferred tax assets. Centrus has visibility on a significant portion of revenue in the LEU segment through 2026, primarily from its long-term sales contracts. Centrus considered both its achievement of sustained profitability and cumulative income in 2021, as well as, the forecasted income, to be significant forms of positive evidence. Negative evidence included uncertainty in and the lack of objectively verifiable evidence for profitability in later years when the Company’s existing sales order book and supply contracts reach expiration in its LEU segment. In the Company’s technical solutions segment, negative evidence included uncertainty in the future funding of the HALEU enrichment facility, and thus, no assumption for the future funding of the HALEU enrichment facility were included in the forecast model because it was not objectively verifiable. Centrus determined that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence and supported a release of the federal valuation allowance. However, due to lack of objectively verifiable information in later years, it was determined that forecasted future income was not sufficient to realize all the deferred tax assets. Therefore, the Company recorded a partial release of its federal valuation allowance.
108



In addition to the partial release of the valuation allowance against federal net deferred taxes, the valuation allowance decreased in 2021 by $30.6 million due to changes in deferred tax assets since the beginning of the year. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against its remaining federal and state net deferred tax assets due to significant federal and state net operating losses and insufficient future taxable income.

Going forward, the Company will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence that would support any further changes to the remaining valuation allowances. Such evidence in its technical solutions segment may include signing new contracts which could have a significant impact on pre-tax income, follow on-work related to the HALEU program, orabandonment of the commercial deployment of the centrifuge technology.Such evidence in our LEU segment may include renewing SWU sales contracts with existing customers and/or signing new SWU sales or purchase contracts with significantly higher or lower margins than currently forecasted.Additional evidence in the LEU segment may include potential deferrals in the timing of deliveries requested by its customers, which would impact revenue recognition timing.The impact of these and other potential positive and negative events will be weighed and evaluated to determine if the valuation allowance should be increased or decreased in the future.

The net deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance were increased as of December 31, 2020, by $39.5 million for previously unrecorded state deferred tax assets, net of federal benefit, in states where we have had historical losses and a remote likelihood of realizing a tax benefit. This increase to state deferred tax assets, net of the full valuation allowance, had no net impact on income tax expense for 2020. When a change in the tax rate or tax law has an impact on deferred taxes, we apply the change based on the years in which the deferred taxes are expected to reverse. The Company records the impact of the change in its consolidated financial statements in the period of enactment. The ultimate realization of the net deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in future years when deferred tax assets are recoverable or are expected to reverse.


The Company has federal net operating losses of $783.3$732.0 million generated through December 31, 2017, that currently expire through 2037. In addition, the Company has federal net operating losses and business interest expense carry forwards of $106.8$131.4 million and $18.5$4.1 million, respectively, generated after December 31, 2017, that do not expire. The Company has concluded that a full valuation allowance is needed for all federal net operating losses. In 2014, the federal net operating losses as well as other tax attributes consisting primarily of tax basis in property of approximately $15.3 million were reduced as a result of Centrus’ cancellation of debt income of approximately $340 million as prescribed by Code Section 108. Centrus also has state net operating losses of $0.2$0.5 million, with no valuation allowance, and state net operating losses of $465.4 million, with a full valuation allowance, that currently expire through 2038. The deferred tax assets for state net operating losses and state unrealized built-in loss deductions have been reduced as a result of Centrus’ tax ownership change and cancellation of debt income in 2014.2037.

Centrus experienced an ownership change as defined under Code Section 382 on September 30, 2014 when it emerged from bankruptcy. Generally, after an ownership change, the use of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits generated prior to the ownership change are subject to an annual limitation. However, there is an exception available to qualifying corporations that eliminates the annual limitation. Centrus can utilize this exception for federal purposes, but not for state purposes. The pre-apportioned annual state limitation is $2.9 million. Centrus also had an unrealized built-in loss as of the ownership change date. To the extent this built-in loss


is recognized during the five-year post-ownership change period through certain depreciation and loss deductions, the same annual limitation for loss and tax credit carryforwards also applies generally to a built-in loss when it is recognized, unless the exception applies. Centrus can utilize the same exception for federal purposes when the built-in loss is recognized, but not for state purposes. To the extent the built-in loss is recognized during the five-year post-ownership change period, the same pre-apportioned state limitation will apply so that the combination of loss carryforwards and recognized built-in losses cannot exceed $2.9 million annually.


Effective Tax Rate


A reconciliation of income taxes calculated based on the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective tax rate follows:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Federal statutory tax rate21 %21 %
Valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets(53)(26)
State rate changes(1)
Executive compensation
State income tax expense, net of federal benefit— 
Uncertain tax positions— 
Effective tax rate(29)%(3)%
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Federal statutory tax rate21 % 21 %
Valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets(18) (15)
State rate changes1
 (6)
Executive compensation(2) (1)
State income tax expense, net of federal benefit(1) 1
Uncertain tax positions(1) 
Other non-deductible expenses(1) 
Effective tax rate(1)%  %




The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 20192021, includes an increasea decrease to the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets of $3.1$71.3 million, or a change to the effective tax rate of (18)%(53%). Included in the valuation allowance decrease is the release of the valuation allowance against federal net deferred taxes of $40.7 million, or a change to the effective tax rate of (30%).


109


The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31 2018, 2020, includes an increasea decrease to the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets of $15.9$13.9 million, or a change to the effective tax rate of (15)%, and a $6.0(26%). Included in the valuation allowance decrease is the release of the valuation allowance against state net deferred taxes of $2.0 million, decrease to the state deferred tax assets resulting from state rate changes, or a change to the effective tax rate of (6)%(4%).



Uncertain Tax Positions


Accounting standards require that a tax position meet a minimum recognition threshold in order for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits, included in Other Long-Term Liabilities, was $0.4$1.0 million as of December 31, 20192021, and $0.2$0.8 million as of December 31, 2018.2020. If recognized, these tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate. As a result of changes to unrecognized tax benefits, the income tax provision (state tax, net of federal benefit) increased $0.2 million and $0.4 million during the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and decreased $0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.2020, respectively. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the table below relates to unrecognized state income tax benefits. Centrus believes that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will not change significantly in the next 12 months.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Balance at beginning of the period$0.8 $0.4 
Additions to tax positions of current period0.4 0.5 
Reductions to tax positions of prior years(0.2)(0.1)
Balance at end of the period$1.0 $0.8 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Balance at beginning of the period$0.2
 $0.3
Additions to tax positions of current period0.3
 
Reductions to tax positions of prior years(0.1) (0.1)
Balance at end of the period$0.4
 $0.2




Centrus and its subsidiaries file income tax returns with the U.S. government and various states and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the federal, Maryland and MarylandTennessee statutes of limitation are closed with respect to all tax years through 2015, and the Kentucky statute of limitations is closed with respect to all tax years through 2014.2017.


Centrus recognizes accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions as a component of interest expense.Interest Expense. Reversals of previously accrued interest for income taxes is typically offset against interest expense, but if the amount is significant, it is reclassified to interest income in the consolidated statement of operations. Centrus recognizes the increase or decrease of accrued penalties for income taxes as a component of selling, generalSelling, General and administrative expense Administrative in the consolidated statement of operations.


The impact of accrued interest and penalties for income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations was a reductionan increase to expenses of less than $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018.December 31, 2020, respectively. Accrued interest and penalties for income taxes, included as a component of Other Long-Term Liabilities, totaled less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.


15.14. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE


Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing income (loss) allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. In calculating diluted net income (loss) per common share, the number of shares is increased by the weighted average number of potential shares related to stock compensation awards. No dilutive effect is recognized in a period in which a net loss has occurred.

On November 17, 2020, the Company completed the purchase of 62,854 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $954.59, less any applicable withholding taxes. (Refer to Note 15 - Stockholders’ Equity). The purchase price per share represented a 25% discount from the aggregate liquidation preference, including accrued but unpaid dividends, of $1,272.78 per share as of September 30, 2020.Since origination, the carrying value on the Balance Sheet was $43.80 per share based on values assigned in the originating securities exchange. The liquidation amount at origination was $1,000.00 per share.
110


The aggregate purchase price of approximately $60 million, less accrued but unpaid dividends attributable to the purchased and retired Series B Senior Preferred Stock, is considered for purposes of Net Income per Share to be a deemed dividend to the extent it exceeds the carrying value on the consolidated Balance Sheet, or $41.9 million.

On February 2, 2021, the Company completed the exchange of 3,873 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Preferred Stock”) for (i) 231,276 shares of Class A Common Stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $21.62 per share, for an aggregate valuation of approximately $7.5 million. The carrying value of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock on the Balance Sheet was $1.00 per share par value. The aggregate liquidation preference of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock, including accrued but unpaid dividends, was $1,291.04 per share as of December 31, 2020.

On November 23, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of 36,867 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $1,145.20, less any applicable withholding taxes. The Company also completed the purchase of the remaining 980 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $1,149.99, less any applicable withholding taxes, on December 15, 2021 (Refer to Note 15 - Stockholders’ Equity). The aggregate purchase price of both transactions was $43.3 million. The carrying value of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock on the consolidated Balance Sheet was $1.00 per share par value.

The aggregate valuation of all 2021 preferred stock transactions of approximately $50.8 million, less accrued but unpaid dividends attributable to the acquired and retired shares of Series B Senior Preferred Stock, is considered for purposes of Net Income per Share to be a deemed dividend in the aggregate amount equal to the amount by which it exceeds the carrying value of the Preferred Stock on the consolidated Balance Sheet, or $37.6 million.

The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares used inand the calculation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share are as follows:
 Year Ended 
December 31,
20212020
Numerator (in millions):
Net income$175.0 $54.4 
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative2.1 6.7 
Distributed earnings allocable to retired preferred shares37.6 41.9 
Net income allocable to common stockholders$135.3 $5.8 
Denominator (in thousands):
Average common shares outstanding - basic13,493 9,825 
Potentially dilutive shares related to stock options and restricted stock units (a)
386 298 
Average common shares outstanding - diluted13,879 10,123 
Net income per common share (in dollars):
Basic$10.03 $0.59 
Diluted$9.75 $0.57 
There are no common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted calculation as a result of a net loss in the period or options outstanding and considered anti-dilutive as their exercise price exceeded the average share market price.
111
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Numerator (in millions):   
Net loss$(16.5) $(104.1)
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative7.8
 7.8
Net loss allocable to common stockholders$(24.3) $(111.9)
    
Denominator (in thousands):   
Average common shares outstanding - basic9,566
 9,151
Potentially dilutive shares related to stock options and restricted stock units (a)

 
Average common shares outstanding - diluted9,566
 9,151
    
Net loss per common share (in dollars) - basic and diluted:$(2.54) $(12.23)
    
(a) Common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted calculation as a result of a net loss in the period (in thousands)67
 23
    
Options outstanding and considered anti-dilutive as their exercise price exceeded the average share market price (in thousands)352
 360





16.15.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Shares Outstanding

Changes in the number of shares outstanding are as follows:
 Preferred Stock,
Series B
Common Stock,
Class A
Common Stock,
Class B
Balance at December 31, 2019104,574 8,347,427 1,117,462 
Issuance under public offering 2,537,500  
Common stock issued for options exercised 107,000  
Conversion of common stock from Class B to Class A— 398,262 (398,262)
Purchase under tender offer(62,854)—  
Balance at December 31, 202041,720 11,390,189 719,200 
Issuance under public offering 1,516,467  
Common stock issued for options exercised 216,500  
Issuance of previously vested restricted stock units— 89,318 — 
Notional stock units paid in shares— 206,183 — 
Common stock and warrant issued in exchange for preferred stock(3,873)231,276  
Purchase under tender offer(37,847)—  
Balance at December 31, 2021 13,649,933 719,200 

Common Stock


The Company’s certificate of incorporation authorizes 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 70,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.10 par value per share (the “Class A Common Stock”) and 30,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, $0.10 par value per share (the “Class B Common Stock,” and together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”). TheAs of December 31, 2021, the Company has issued 9,464,88914,369,133 shares of Common Stock, consisting of 8,347,42713,649,933 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,117,462719,200 shares of Class B Common Stock.


On December 6, 2018, Centrus issued 398,638Pursuant to a sales agreement with its agents, the Company sold through its ATM Offering an aggregate of 1,516,467 shares of its Class A Common Stock in 2021 for a total of $44.2 million. After expenses and commissions paid to the agents the Company’s proceeds totaled $42.4 million. Additionally, the Company recorded direct costs of $0.3 million related to the issuance. The shares of Class A Common Stock were issued pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239242), which became effective on August 5, 2020, and a prospectus supplement dated December 31, 2020, to the prospectus. The Company currently intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for general working capital purposes, to invest in technology development and deployment, and to repay outstanding debt.

As previously disclosed on Form 8-K filed February 5, 2021, on February 2, 2021, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Voting Agreement Amendment”) to its existing Voting and Nomination Agreement with a $0.10 par value, as partMr. Morris Bawabeh, Kulayba LLC and M&D Bawabeh Foundation, Inc. (collectively, the “MB Group”) and an Exchange Agreement (as described below) whereby the MB Group agreed to support management’s recommendation on certain matters at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and Kulayba LLC agreed to exchange shares of the securities exchange described in Note 9, Debt. TheCompany’s Preferred Stock for shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock is recordedand a warrant to acquire additional shares of Class A Common Stock. Pursuant to the First Amendment to the Voting and Nomination Agreement, the MB Group agreed to cause all shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record or beneficially owned by the MB Group at the Annual Meeting to be voted in favor of (i) an amendment to extend the length of the term of the Company’s Section 382 Rights Agreement dated
112


as of April 6, 2016, as amended to date, for two years from June 30, 2021, to June 30, 2023, and (ii) an increase of shares of Class A Common Stock reserved for delivery under the Company’s Centrus Energy Corp 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended to date, of an additional 700,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. At the Annual Meeting both of the above referenced proposals were approved by the Company’s stockholders.

In connection with the entry into the Voting Agreement Amendment, the Company and Kulayba LLC also entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated February 2, 2021 (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which Kulayba LLC agreed to exchange (the “Exchange”) 3,873 shares of Preferred Stock, representing a $5,000,198 liquidation preference (including accrued and unpaid dividends), for (i) 231,276 shares of Class A Common Stock priced at the closing market price of $21.62 on the consolidated balance sheetdate the Exchange Agreement was signed and (ii) a Centrus Energy Corp. Warrant to Purchase Class A Common Stock (the “Warrant”), exercisable for 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at fair valuean exercise price of $21.62 per share, which was the closing market price on the date the Exchange Agreement was signed, subject to certain customary adjustments pursuant to the terms of the Warrant. The Warrant is exercisable by Kulayba LLC for a period commencing on the closing date of the Exchange and ending, unless sooner terminated as provided in the Warrant, on the first to occur of: (a) the second anniversary of the closing date of the Exchange or (b) the last business day immediately prior to the consummation of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Warrant) which results in the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction owning less transaction costs, or $0.8than 50% of the voting equity of the surviving entity immediately after the consummation of the Fundamental Transaction. The Company retired the 3,873 shares of Preferred Stock received by the Company under the Exchange Agreement.

On September 1, 2020, the Company completed the sale of 2,537,500 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 that became effective on August 5, 2020, as supplemented by the prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on August 21, 2020. The price to the public in this offering was $10.00 per share of Class A Common Stock. The aggregate gross proceeds from the offering were approximately $25.4 million, asbefore deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company of December 31, 2019.$2.3 million.


Shares of Class B Common Stock that are sold in the market are automatically converted to shares of Class A Common Stock. In 2019, a total of 288,620 sharesShares of Class B Common Stock that were sold in the market and converted to shares of Class A Common Stock.Stock totaled 0 in 2021 and 398,262 in 2020.


The Company has reserved 1,200,0001,900,000 shares of Class A Common Stock under its management incentive plan, of which approximately 422,000844,293 shares are available for future awards as of December 31, 2019.2021. Refer to Note 13,12,Stock-Based Compensation, for additional information.


The Class A Common Stock trades under the symbol “LEU” on the NYSE American trading platform.


The Class B Common Stock was issued to Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation (“Toshiba”) and Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company (“B&W”) and has the same rights, powers, preferences and restrictions and ranks equally in all matters with the Class A Common Stock, except voting. Holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to elect, in the aggregate, two members of the Board of Directors of the Company, subject to certain holding requirements.


Series B Senior Preferred Stock


On February 14,In 2017, Centrus issued 104,574 shares of Series B Senior Preferred Stock as part of thea securities exchange described in Note 9, Debt.exchange. The issuance of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock was a non-cash financing transaction. As detailed below, the Series B Senior Preferred Stock was purchased by the Company in 2020 and 2021 and the designation of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock was eliminated and all shares of preferred stock of the Company previously designated as Series B Senior Preferred Stock were returned to authorized but unissued and undesignated shares of preferred stock of the Company.

113


The Series B Senior Preferred Stock hashad a par value of $1.00 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Liquidation Preference”). The Series B Preferred Stock is recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value less transaction costs, or $4.6 million, as of December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.

Holders of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock arewere entitled to cumulative dividends of 7.5% per annum of the Liquidation Preference. Centrus is obligated to pay cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock in an amount equal to the Liquidation Preference to the extent that dividends are declared by the Board and:
(a)its pension plans and Enrichment Corp.’s pension plans are at least 90% funded on a variable rate premium calculation in the current plan year;
(b)its net income calculated in accordance with GAAP (excluding the effect of pension remeasurement) for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds $7.5 million;
(c)its free cash flow (defined as the sum of cash provided by (used in) operating activities and cash provided by (used in) investing activities) for the immediately preceding four fiscal quarters exceeds $35 million;
(d)the balance of cash and cash equivalents calculated in accordance with GAAP on the last day of the immediately preceding quarter would exceed $150 million after pro forma application of the dividend payment; and
(e)dividends may be legally paid under Delaware law.



Centrus hashad not met thesethe criteria for payment of dividends for the periods from issuance through December 31, 2019, and has not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2019. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative to the extent not paid at any quarter-end, whether or not declared and whether or not there are assets of the Company legally available for the payment of such dividends in whole or in part. As of December 31, 2019, the Series B Preferred Stock has an aggregate liquidation preference of $127.2 million including accumulated dividends of $22.6 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Series B Preferred Stock had an aggregate liquidation preference of $119.3 million, including accumulated dividends of $14.7 million.

Outstanding sharesfinal redemption of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock are redeemablein 2021.

2020 Tender Offer

On November 17, 2020, pursuant to a tender offer announced on October 19, 2020, the Company completed the purchase of 62,854 shares of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock at a price per share of $954.59, less any applicable withholding taxes, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $60 million. The purchase price per share represented a 25% discount from the aggregate liquidation preference, including accrued but unpaid dividends, of $1,272.78 per share as of September 30, 2020. These shares represented approximately 60% of the Company's outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2020. The remaining Series B Senior Preferred Stock outstanding after the transaction was 41,720 shares.

On December 22, 2020, the Company filed with the Delaware Secretary of State a Certificate of Retirement of 62,854 Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, to effect the retirement of the Company’s option,Series B Senior Preferred Stock repurchased upon the completion of its previously announced tender offer to purchase Series B Senior Preferred Stock. Effective upon filing, the Certificate of Retirement amended the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to reduce the total number of authorized Series B Senior Preferred Stock by 62,854 shares such that the total number of authorized Series B Senior Preferred Stock of the Company was 41,720 shares.

2021 Tender Offer

On October 20, 2021, the Company announced the commencement of a tender offer to purchase all of its outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, at a price of $1,145.20 per Series B Senior Preferred Stock (inclusive of any rights to accrued but unpaid dividends), to the sellers in whole orcash, less any applicable withholding taxes (the “Offer”). The Offer was made pursuant to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed by the Company on October 20, 2021 with the SEC. The aggregate liquidation preference per Series B Senior Preferred Stock (including accrued but unpaid dividends) was $1,347.29 as of September 30, 2021.

On November 23, 2021, the Company announced the results of the tender offer and the related consent solicitation (the “Consent Solicitation”) to amend the certificate of designation of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Amendment”). 36,867 Series B Senior Preferred Stock were properly tendered and not properly withdrawn in part,the Offer, and corresponding consents have been delivered in the Consent Solicitation. Pursuant to the terms of the Offer and Consent Solicitation, the Company has accepted for purchase all of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock tendered in the Offer, for an amountaggregate purchase price of cash$42.2 million. The accepted shares represent 97.4% of the Company’s outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2021. Based on the final results, the requisite consent of at least 90% of the outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock required to approve the Series B Preferred Amendment was obtained. On November 23, 2021, the Company issued a Notice of Full Redemption providing for the redemption of any and all shares of the Company’s Series B Senior Preferred Stock outstanding after consummation of the Company’s tender offer to purchase all of its issued and outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock. On December 15, 2021, the Company completed the redemption of all 980 outstanding Series B Senior Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million. The aggregate purchase price of $43.3 million was offset by direct costs totaling $0.9 million.

The effect of the Series B Preferred Amendment was to: (i) cease any obligation to pay dividends on Series B Senior Preferred Stock (other than the payment of accrued dividends in connection with a redemption or distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up), (ii) permit the Company to redeem Series B Senior Preferred Stock during the 90 days following the date of effectiveness of the Series B Preferred Amendment at a redemption price per share equal to $1,145.20 (plus any additional accrued dividends for the Liquidation Preference, plus an amount equalperiod from and including the date
114


of effectiveness of the Series B Preferred Amendment to the accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, whether or not declared, through date of redemption.redemption), (iii) remove the prohibition on the declaration and payment of dividends on junior stock of the Company, which includes all shares of the Company’s capital stock defined as “Common Stock” in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, or the redemption, purchase or acquisition of such junior stock, and (iv) remove the restriction on redemption, purchase or acquisition of capital stock of the Company ranking on parity with the Series B Senior Preferred Stock.


On December 16, 2021, the Company filed a Certificate of Elimination of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock of Centrus Energy Corp. with the Secretary of State of Delaware (the “Certificate of Elimination”) to eliminate the designation of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock and to return all shares of preferred stock of the Company previously designated as Series B Senior Preferred Stock to authorized but unissued and undesignated shares of preferred stock of the Company.

Rights Agreement


On April 6, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted a Section 382 Rights Agreement, which was (a) amended on February 14, 2017 to, among other things, exclude acquisitions of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock issued as part of the exchange offer and consent solicitation from the definition of “Common Shares” in connection with the settlement and completion of the exchange offer and consent solicitation, (theand (b) further amended on April 3, 2019 to, among other things, (i) decreased the purchase price for each one one-thousandth (1/1000th) of a share of the Company’s Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, from $26.00 to $18.00 and (ii) extended the Final Expiration Date (as defined in the Rights Agreement) from April 5, 2019 to April 5, 2022 (as amended, the “Rights Agreement”). The Board adopted the Rights Agreement in an effort to protect shareholder value by, among other things, attempting to protect against a possible limitation on the Company’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards and other tax benefits, which may be used to reduce potential future income tax obligations.


In connection with the adoption of the Rights Agreement, the Board declared a dividend of one preferred-share-purchase-right for each share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding as of the Effective Date. The rights initially trade together with the common stock and are not exercisable. In the absence of further action by the Board, the rights would generally become exercisable and allow a holder to acquire shares of a new series of the Company’s preferred stock if any person or group acquires 4.99% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, or if a person or group that already owns 4.99% or more of the Company’s Class A Common Stock acquires additional shares representing 0.5% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The rights beneficially owned by the acquirer would become null and void, resulting in significant dilution in the ownership interest of such acquirer.


The Board may exempt any acquisition of the Company’s common stock from the provisions of the Rights Agreement if it determines that doing so would not jeopardize or endanger the Company’s use of its tax assets or is otherwise in the best interests of the Company. The Board also has the ability to amend or terminate the Rights Agreement prior to a triggering event.


On April 3, 2019,8, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, and the Company entered into, a SecondThird Amendment to the Section 382 Rights Agreement (the “Second“Third Amendment”), which amends the Rights Agreement.. The SecondThird Amendment among other things, (i) decreased the purchase price for each one one-thousandth (1/1000th) of a share of the Company’s Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, from $26.00 to $18.00 and (ii) extendedmodified the Final Expiration Date (as defined in the Rights Agreement) from April 5, 2019 to April 5, 2022.be June 30, 2023.





Shares Outstanding

Changes in the number of shares outstanding are as follows:
115


 
Preferred Stock,
Series B
 
Common Stock,
Class A
 
Common Stock,
Class B
      
Balance at December 31, 2017104,574
 7,632,669
 1,406,082
Issuance of Class A Common Stock
 398,638
 
Balance at December 31, 2018104,574
 8,031,307
 1,406,082
      
Issuance of Class A Common Stock
 27,500
 
Conversion of Common Stock from Class B to Class A
 288,620
 (288,620)
Balance at December 31, 2019104,574
 8,347,427
 1,117,462


17.16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Commitments under SWU Purchase Agreements


TENEX


A major supplier of SWU to the Company is the Russian governmentgovernment-owned entity TENEX, Joint-Stock Company (“TENEX”). Under a 2011 agreement with TENEX, as amended, (the “Russian“TENEX Supply Agreement”Contract”), the Company purchases SWU contained in LEU received from TENEX, and the Company delivers natural uranium to TENEX for the LEU’s uranium component. The LEU that the Company obtains from TENEX under the agreement is subject to quotas and other restrictions applicable to commercial Russian LEU. Further, the ability of the Company or TENEX to implement the TENEX Supply Contract is vulnerable to any new sanctions or restrictions that might be imposed by Russia, the United States, or other countries in the future, including as a result of the war in Ukraine.


The RussianTENEX Supply AgreementContract originally was originally signed with commitments through 2022 but was modified in 2015 to give the Company the right to reschedule certain quantities of SWU of the original commitments into the period 2023 and beyond, in return for the purchase of additional SWU in those years. The Company has exercised this right to reschedule in each year through December 31, 2018.2021. If the Company exercises this right to reschedule in full during the remaining years of the contract’s original term, the Company will have a rescheduled post-2022 purchase commitment that could extend through 2028.


The RussianTENEX Supply AgreementContract provides that the Company must pay for all SWU in its minimum purchase obligation each year, even if it fails to submit orders for such SWU. In such a case, the Company would pay for the SWU but have to take the unordered SWU in the following year.


Pricing terms for SWU under the RussianTENEX Supply AgreementContract are based on a combination of market-related price points and other factors. This formula was subject to an adjustment at the end of 2018 that reduced the unit costs of SWU under this contract in 2019 and for the duration of the contract.


Orano


On April 27,In 2018, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Orano Supply Agreement”) with the French company Orano Cycle (“Orano”) for the long-term supply to the Company of SWU contained in LEU, nominally commencing in 2023.LEU. Under the Orano Supply Agreement, as amended, the Company purchasessupply of SWU containedcommenced in LEU received from Orano,2020 and the Company delivers natural uraniumextends to Orano for the natural uranium feed material component of LEU.2028. The Company may elect to begin to accept deliveries as early as 2021 or to defer the commencement of purchases until 2024 and has the option to extend the six-year purchasesupply period for an additional two years. The Orano Supply Agreement provides significant flexibility to adjust purchase volumes, subject to annual minimums and maximums in fixed amounts that vary year by year. The pricing for the SWU purchased by the Company is determined by a


formula that uses a combination of market-related price points and other factors and is subject to certain floors and ceilings. Prices are payable in a combination of U.S. dollars and euros.


Milestones Under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement


The CompanyCompany’s predecessor USEC Inc. and DOE signed an agreement dated June 17, 2002, as amended (the “2002 DOE-USEC Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties made long-term commitments directed at resolving issues related to the stability and security of the domestic uranium enrichment industry. DOE consented to the assumption by Centrus of the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement and other agreements between the Company and DOE subject to an express reservation of all rights, remedies and defenses by DOE and the Company under those agreements. The 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement requires Centrus to develop, demonstrate and deploy advanced enrichment technology in accordance with milestones, including the deployment of a commercial American Centrifuge Plant, and provides for remedies in the event of a failure to meet a milestone under certain circumstances, including terminating the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement, revoking Centrus’ access to DOE’s centrifuge technology that is required for the success of the Company’s ongoing work with the American Centrifuge technology, requiring Centrus to transfer certain rights in the American Centrifuge technology and facilities to DOE, and requiring Centrus to reimburse DOE for certain costs associated with the American Centrifuge technology. The 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement provides that if a delaying event beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Centrus occurs that could affect Centrus’
116


ability to meet the American Centrifuge Plant milestone under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement, DOE and the Company will jointly meet to discuss in good faith possible adjustments to the milestones as appropriate to accommodate the delaying event. The assumption ofIn 2014, the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement provided for inand other agreements between the planCompany and DOE were assumed by Centrus subject to an express reservation of reorganization in the Company’s 2014 Chapter 11 bankruptcy (now completed) did not affect the ability of either party to assert all rights, remedies and defenses by DOE and the Company under the agreement and all such rights, remedies and defenses are specifically preserved and all-time limits tolled expressly including all rights, remedies and defenses and time limits relating to any missed milestones.those agreements. DOE and the Company have agreed that all rights, remedies and defenses of the parties with respect to any missed milestones and all other matters under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement continue to be preserved, and that the time limits for each party to respond to any missed milestones continue to be tolled.


Legal Matters


From time to time, the Company is involved in various pending legal proceedings, including the pending legal proceedings described below.


In 1993, the United States Enrichment Corporation, at that time a wholly-owned government corporation (“USEC-Government”), entered into a lease for the Paducah and Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plants (collectively, the “GDPs”) with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”). As part of that lease, DOE and USEC-Government also entered into a memorandum of understanding (“Power MOU”) regarding power purchase agreements between DOE and the providers of power to the GDPs. Under the Power MOU, DOE and USEC-Government agreed upon the allocation of rights and liabilities under the power purchase agreements. In 1998, USEC-Government was privatized and became the United States Enrichment Corporation, now a principal subsidiary of the Company (“Enrichment Corp.”). Pursuant to legislation authorizing the privatization, the lease for the GDPs, which included the Power MOU as an Appendix, was transferred to Enrichment Corp. and Enrichment Corp. was given the right to purchase power from DOE. The Paducah GDP was shut down in 2013 and deleased by Enrichment Corp. in 2014. On August 4, 2021, DOE informally informed Enrichment Corp. that the Joppa power plant, which had supplied power to the Paducah GDP, was planned to be decontaminated and decommissioned (D&D). According to DOE, the power purchase agreement with Electric Energy Inc. (“EEI”) requires DOE to pay for a portion of the D&D costs of the Joppa power plant and DOE has asserted that a portion of the DOE liability is the responsibility of Enrichment Corp. under the Power MOU in the amount of approximately $9.6 million. The Company is assessing DOE’s assertions including whether all or a portion of any such potential liability had been previously settled. The Company has not formed an opinion on the merits nor is it able to estimate the potential liability, if any, and no expense or liability has been accrued.

On August 30, 2013, the Company submitted a claim to DOE under the Contract Disputes Act for payment of $42.8 million, representing DOE’s share of pension and postretirement benefits costs related to the transition of employees at the former Portsmouth site employeesGDP to DOE’s D&D contractor. On August 27, 2014, the DOE contracting officer denied the Company’s claim. As a result, the Company filed an appeal of the decision in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in January 2015. Centrus believes that

On January 13, 2021, the Company and DOE is responsible forreached a significant portion of any pension and postretirement benefit costs associated withtentative agreement to settle the transition of employees at Portsmouth.litigation. The receivable for DOE’s share of pension and postretirement benefits costs has a full valuation allowance duesettlement was subject to the lackapproval by DOE, the U.S. Department of a resolution with DOE and uncertainty regardingJustice, the amounts owedCompany’s Board of Directors, and the timingCourt. On September 7, 2021, after the final approvals for the settlement were received, the settlement agreement was signed by the parties. Under the terms of collection. While proceeding with litigation,the settlement agreement, DOE paid the Company $43.5 million, of which $33.8 million was contributed to the pension plan in September 2021 for Enrichment Corp. and $9.7 million was deposited in October 2021 in a trust for payment of postretirement health benefits payable by Enrichment Corp. After receiving payment, at the Company’s request the case was dismissed. The payment of $43.5 million is still pursuing settlement.included in revenue of the technical solutions segment for the year ended December 31, 2021.


On May 26, 2019, the Company, Enrichment Corp., and fivesix other DOE contractors who have operated facilities at the Portsmouth Ohio, Gaseous Diffusion PlantGDP site (including, in the case of the Company, the American Centrifuge Plant site located on the premises (the “Portsmouth GDP” site)premises) were named as defendants in a class action complaint filed by Ursula McGlone, Jason McGlone, Julia Dunham, and K.D. and C.D., minor children by and through their parent and natural guardian Julia Dunham (collectively, the “McGlone Plaintiffs”) in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
117


The complaint seeks damages for alleged off-site contamination allegedly resulting from activities on the Portsmouth GDP site. The McGlone Plaintiffs are seeking to represent a class of (i) all current or former residents within a seven-mile radius of the Portsmouth GDP site and (ii) all students and their parents at the Zahn’s Corner Middle School from 1993-present. The Company believes that its operations atcomplaint was amended on December 10, 2019 and on January 10, 2020 to add additional plaintiffs and new claims. On July 31, 2020, the Portsmouth GDP site were fullycourt granted in compliance withpart and denied in part the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s


regulations. Furtherdefendants’ motion to dismiss the Company believes that any such liability should be covered by indemnification undercase. The court dismissed ten of the Price-Anderson Act. The Companyfifteen claims and Enrichment Corp. have provided notificationsallowed the remaining claims to DOE requiredproceed to invoke indemnification under the Price-Anderson Actnext stage of the litigation process. On August 18, 2020, the McGlone Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint and other contractual provisions.

notice of dismissal of three of the individual plaintiffs. On June 28, 2019,March 18, 2021, the McGlone Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint to add new plaintiffs and allegations. On March 19, 2021, the court granted the McGlone Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint. On May 24, 2021, the Company, Enrichment Corp. and fourthe other DOE contractors who have operated facilitiesdefendants filed their motion to dismiss the complaint. The court has not rendered a decision at this time. Meanwhile, the Portsmouth GDP site were named as defendants in a class action complaint filed by Ray Pritchard and Sharon Melick (collectively, the “Pritchard Plaintiffs”)parties are in the U.S. District Court in the Southern Districtdiscovery stage of Ohio, Eastern Division. The complaint seeks damages for alleged off-site contamination allegedly resulting from activities on the Portsmouth GDP site. The Pritchard Plaintiffs are seeking to represent a class of all current or former residents within a seven-mile radius of the Portsmouth GDP site.litigation. The Company believes that its operations at the Portsmouth GDP site were fully in compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulations. Further, the Company believes that any such liability should be covered by indemnificationindemnified under the Price-Anderson Act.Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act (“Price-Anderson Act”). The Company and Enrichment Corp. have provided notifications to DOE required to invoke indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act and other contractual provisions.


On November 27, 2019, the Company, Enrichment Corp. and six other DOE contractors who have operated facilities at the Portsmouth GDP site were named as defendants in a class action complaint filed by James Matthews, Jennifer Brownfield Clark, Joanne Ross, the Estate of A.R., and others similarly situated (the “Matthews Plaintiffs”), in the Common Pleas Court of Pike County, Ohio. On January 3, 2020, the complaint was removed to the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Ohio for adjudication. The complaint seekssought injunctive relief, compensatory damages, statutory damages, and any other relief allowed by law for alleged off-site contamination allegedly resulting from activities on the Portsmouth GDP site. The Matthews Plaintiffs expressly contendcontended that the ongoing and continuous releases that injured the Plaintiffs and Class Members areclass members were not “nuclear incidents” as that term is defined in the Price-Anderson Act, but rather “freestanding state law claims concerning traditional-style state regulation.” On July 27, 2020, the court granted the Company, Enrichment Corp. and the other defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint because the Matthews Plaintiffs had opted not to proceed under the Price-Anderson Act which preempts state law. On August 18, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On October 6, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision and dismissed the case. The Plaintiffs did not file a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court; the Plaintiffs had to file such a petition by January 4, 2022 for the U.S. Supreme Court, and therefore, the lower court’s decision to dismiss the case is final.

On September 3, 2020, the Company, Enrichment Corp., nine other DOE contractors who have operated facilities at the Portsmouth GDP site and eleven individuals in their personal capacity some of whom are current and former DOE employees were named as defendants (“Walburn Defendants”) in a class action complaint filed by Jeffrey Walburn, Charles O. Lawson Jr., Kimberly M. Lawson, James A. Brogdon, Stephen Patrick Spriggs, Donald Slone, Vicki P. Slone, Victoria Slone Moore, Toni West, Carl R. Hartley, Heather R. Hartley, Vina Colley, Antony Preston, David B. Rose, Michael E. Groves, George W. Clark, Estate of Kathy Sue Brogdon (deceased), Estate of Jay Paul Brogdon (deceased), and Jon Doe(s), and Jane Doe(s), on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated individuals (“Walburn Plaintiffs”) in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. The complaint alleged that the named defendants conspired and concealed nuclear incidents in violation of the Price-Anderson Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and other state claims. The complainants sought damages and equitable and injunctive relief arising from economic losses, property losses, and non-economic damages resulting from toxic and radioactive releases from the Portsmouth GDP. On November 20, 2020, the Walburn Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to add two individuals to the complaint as defendants in their individual capacity. One of those individuals was Daniel Poneman, Centrus’ Chief Executive Officer. In the 78-page complaint, Mr. Poneman was referenced only twice, without any cited allegations against him; once in the caption and once referencing his position at the Company. The Company has notified its insurance carrier regarding the claim. On February 11, 2021, the Walburn Plaintiffs amended their complaint for a second time to replace two corporate defendants with two others (one of whom was a contractor to Enrichment Corp. and also to its
118


predecessor prior to its privatization in 1998 and the other a former DOE contractor) and removed four named individual defendants from the complaint. On March 2, 2021, Walburn Defendants filed their motion to dismiss. On July 14, 2021, the court put the case on hold until November 11, 2021, to give the Plaintiffs the opportunity to retain new counsel. The court conditionally granted the Plaintiffs’ local counsel’s request to withdraw as counsel and terminated the representation of the two other co-counsel. The Company believes that its operations at the Portsmouth GDP site were fully in compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulations. Further, the Company believes that any such liability should be covered by indemnificationindemnified under the Price-Anderson Act. The Company and Enrichment Corp. have provided notifications to DOE required to invoke indemnification under the Price-Anderson Act and other contractual provisions.

On October 11, 2018, the Company’s subsidiaries, Enrichment Corp. and American Centrifuge Enrichment, LLC (“ACE”, together with Enrichment Corp., the “Company Subsidiaries”) filed proofs of claim in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (the “Bankruptcy Court”) against each of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (“FENOC”), FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC (“FENG,” and together with FENOC, the “FirstEnergy Contract Parties”), FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (“FES”) and FirstEnergy Generation, LLC (“FG”). The claims relate to damages arising from the rejection and breach of a long-term contract between the Company Subsidiaries and the FirstEnergy Contract Parties that was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and made effective as of July 26, 2018. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries include claims against the FirstEnergy Contract Parties based on their liability as parties to the contract that was rejected and breached. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries also include claims against FES and FG based on their liability under guaranties they issued that may obligate FES and FG to satisfy the rejection and breach of contract damages claims.

On November 15, 2019, FENOC, FENG, FES and FG (collectively, the “FirstEnergy Debtors”)11, 2021, Plaintiffs filed objections to the Company Subsidiaries’ claims in the Bankruptcy Court. No decision on the claims has yet been reached by the Bankruptcy Court. The Company Subsidiaries and the FirstEnergy Debtors have submitted cross motions for summary judgment on the issuea notice of whether the guaranties apply. On March 13, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court ruled in favor of the FirstEnergy Debtors on their motion, finding that the guaranties did not apply to the Company Subsidiaries’ claims. The Company is considering its appeal rights. The ruling does not apply to the Company Subsidiaries’ claims against the FirstEnergy Contract Parties.voluntary dismissal without prejudice.


Centrus is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, other than the above, Centrus does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its cash flows, results of operations or consolidated financial condition.



18.17.  ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)


The sole component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) relates to activity in the accounting for pension and postretirement health and life benefit plans. The amortization of prior service costs (credits) areis reclassified from AOCI and included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. In 2019, the effect of pension plan changes related to lump sum payment options has been added to AOCI as an unrecognized prior service cost to be amortized over the average future service of active employees starting in 2020. For further details, refer to Note 12,11, Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Benefits.


19.
18. REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA, MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND SEGMENT INFORMATION


Revenue by customer location, including customers in a foreign country representing 10% or more of total revenue, follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
United States$220.5 $171.7 
Foreign:
Belgium36.6 35.8 
Japan34.6 23.4 
Other6.6 16.3 
Total foreign77.8 75.5 
      Total revenue$298.3 $247.2 
* less than 10%
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
United States$152.4
 $141.3
Foreign:   
Japan23.4
 *
Belgium21.5
 35.2
Other12.4
 16.5
Total foreign57.3
 51.7
      Total revenue$209.7
 $193.0
* less than 10%   


In 2019,The U.S. government and its contractors, in the Company’s 10 largest customerstechnical solutions segment, represented approximately 95%38% of total revenue in 2021 and its three21% in 2020.

The ten largest customers represented approximately 56% of total revenue. Inin the Company’s LEU segment represented approximately 57% of total revenue in 2021. Revenue from Floridaeach of Synatom and Kyushu Electric Power Company represented approximately 12% of total revenue in 2021.

In 2020, the ten largest customers in the Company’s LEU segment represented approximately 71% of total revenue in 2020. Revenue from Synatom, Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. and Light, Dominion Energy South Carolina Tohoku Electric Power Company, Inc. and Synatom represented approximately 27%14%, 12%, 11%,13% and 10%, respectively, of total revenue in 2019. In 2018, the Company’s 10 largest customers represented approximately 85% of total revenue and its three largest customers represented approximately 52% of total revenue. In the Company’s LEU segment, revenue from Florida Power and Light, Synatom, and South Carolina Electric & Gas represented approximately 21%, 18%, 13%, respectively, of total revenue in 2018. In the Company’s technical solutions segment, the U.S. government and its contractors represented approximately 19% of total revenue in 2019 and 12% in 2018, respectively. 2020.

No other customer represented more than 10% of total revenue in 20192021 or 2018.2020.


119


Centrus has two reportable segments: the LEU segment with two components, SWU and uranium, and the technical solutions segment. The LEU segment includes sales of the SWU component of LEU, sales of both the SWU and uranium components of LEU, and sales of uranium. The technical solutions segment includes revenue and cost of sales for work that Centrus performs under the HALEU Contract. The technical solutions segment also includes limited services provided by Centrus to DOE and its contractors at the Piketon facility. Gross profit is Centrus’ measure for segment reporting. There were no intersegment sales in the periods presented.




The following table presents the Company’s segment information (in millions):
 Year Ended 
December 31,
20212020
Revenue
LEU segment:
Separative work units$163.3 $151.5 
Uranium22.8 39.0 
Total186.1 190.5 
Technical solutions segment112.2 56.7 
Total revenue$298.3 $247.2 
Segment Gross Profit (Loss)
LEU segment$73.0 $97.8 
Technical solutions segment41.5 (0.2)
Gross profit$114.5 $97.6 
 Year Ended 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Revenue   
LEU segment:   
Separative work units$123.7
 $130.6
Uranium45.7
 33.8
Total169.4
 164.4
Technical solutions segment40.3
 28.6
Total revenue$209.7
 $193.0
    
Segment Gross Profit (Loss)   
LEU segment$50.8
 $(23.3)
Technical solutions segment(18.3) 5.4
Gross profit (loss)$32.5
 $(17.9)


The Company’s total assets are not presented for each reportable segment as they are not reviewed by, nor otherwise regularly provided to, the chief operating decision maker. Centrus’ long-term or long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment and other assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet, were located in the United States as of December 31, 2019,2021, and December 31, 2018.

2020.

20. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
 2019
 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. Year
Revenue$38.7
 $10.6
 $104.7
 $55.7
 $209.7
Cost of sales44.2
 14.9
 69.2
 48.9
 177.2
Gross profit (loss)(5.5) (4.3) 35.5
 6.8
 32.5
Advanced technology costs6.6
 5.1
 1.3
 1.6
 14.6
Selling, general and administrative8.1
 7.7
 8.7
 9.2
 33.7
Amortization of intangible assets1.1
 1.2
 1.8
 2.4
 6.5
Special charges (credits) for workforce reductions(0.1) (2.9) 0.8
 0.3
 (1.9)
Gain on sales of assets(0.4) (0.1) (0.2) 
 (0.7)
Operating income (loss)(20.8) (15.3) 23.1
 (6.7) (19.7)
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)(0.1) 
 (0.1) (4.1) (4.3)
Interest expense1.0
 1.0
 0.9
 0.1
 3.0
Investment income(0.7) (0.7) (0.5) (0.3) (2.2)
Income tax (benefit) expense(0.1) 
 
 0.4
 0.3
Net income (loss)$(20.9) $(15.6) $22.8
 $(2.8) $(16.5)
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative2.0
 2.0
 1.9
 1.9
 7.8
Net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders$(22.9) $(17.6) $20.9
 $(4.7) $(24.3)
          
Net income (loss) per share:         
Basic$(2.40) $(1.84) $2.18
 $(0.49) $(2.54)
Diluted$(2.40) $(1.84) $2.17
 $(0.49) $(2.54)
 2018
 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. Year
Revenue$35.7
 $39.4
 $34.1
 $83.8
 $193.0
Cost of sales41.3
 49.8
 26.3
 93.5
 210.9
Gross profit (loss)(5.6) (10.4) 7.8
 (9.7) (17.9)
Advanced technology costs7.7
 5.7
 5.8
 6.9
 26.1
Selling, general and administrative11.2
 9.7
 8.8
 10.2
 39.9
Amortization of intangible assets1.3
 1.5
 1.7
 2.1
 6.6
Special charges for workforce reductions and advisory costs0.6
 0.3
 0.6
 0.7
 2.2
Gain on sales of assets(0.1) (0.2) 
 
 (0.3)
Operating loss(26.3) (27.4) (9.1) (29.6) (92.4)
Gain on early extinguishment of debt
 
 
 (0.5) (0.5)
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)(1.6) (1.7) (1.6) 15.5
 10.6
Interest expense1.0
 1.0
 1.0
 1.1
 4.1
Investment income(0.6) (0.6) (0.7) (0.6) (2.5)
Income tax (benefit) expense(0.1) 
 
 0.1
 
Net loss$(25.0) $(26.1) $(7.8) $(45.2) $(104.1)
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative1.9
 2.0
 1.9
 2.0
 7.8
Net loss allocable to common stockholders$(26.9) $(28.1) $(9.7) $(47.2) $(111.9)
          
Net loss per share - basic and diluted$(2.97) $(3.08) $(1.06) $(5.10) $(12.23)
The calculation of net income (loss) per share on a dilutive basis is provided in Note 15, Net Income (Loss) Per Share. No dilutive effect is recognized in periods in which a net loss has occurred or in which the assumed conversion effect of options or convertible securities is anti-dilutive.


21. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. As of the date of this filing, our LEU segment operations have not been affected and we are working with our suppliers, fabricators and customers to monitor the situation closely. Furthermore, other than restrictions on a limited number of our employees at the Piketon, Ohio facility, our Technical Solutions segment operations, including the HALEU contract, have not been significantly affected. However, we cannot reasonably estimate the length or severity of this pandemic, or the extent to which the disruption may materially impact our consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated cash flows in fiscal 2020.

115120