UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
| | |
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the fiscal year ended | December 31, 20162017 |
OR
|
| | |
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the transition period from to | |
Commission File Number 000-25131
BLUCORA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Delaware | | 91-1718107 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 800, Bellevue, Washington 980046333 State Hwy 161, 6th Floor, Irving, Texas 75038
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(425) 201-6100(972) 870-6000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
| Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share | | NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes oý
No ýo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. oý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company”company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | oý | Accelerated filer | ýo |
| Non-accelerated filer | o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o |
| | | Emerging growth company | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | o |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant outstanding as of June 30, 2016,2017, based upon the closing price of Common Stock on June 30, 20162017 as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was $396.2$937.8 million. Common Stock held by each officer and director (or his or her affiliate) has been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of February 21, 2017, 42,085,6852018, 46,710,439 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed by the registrant in connection with the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | Page |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| | | |
| | |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| | | |
| | |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| | | |
| | |
| Item 15. | | |
| | |
| |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding projections of regarding:
our future financial performance; trends in our businesses;ability to effectively implement our future business plans and growth strategy, including our plansability to expand, develop, or acquire particular operations or businesses;achieve the anticipated benefits of our Strategic Transformation (as defined below);
our ability to effectively compete within our industry;
our ability to attract and retain customers, as well as our ability to provide strong customer service;
our future capital requirements and the sufficiencyavailability of financing, if necessary;
our ability to meet our current and future debt service obligations, including our ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants;
our ability to generate strong investment performance for our customers and the impact of the financial markets on our customers’ portfolios;
political and economic conditions and events that directly or indirectly impact the wealth management and tax preparation industries;
our ability to attract and retain productive financial advisors;
our ability to respond to rapid technological changes, including our ability successfully release new products and services or improve upon existing products and services;
our expectations concerning the revenues we generate from fees associated with the financial products that we distribute;
our ability to comply with regulations applicable to the wealth management and tax preparation industries, including increased costs associated with new or changing regulations;
our ability to successfully transition our wealth management business to a new clearing platform and our expectations concerning the benefits that may be derived therefrom;
risks associated with the use and implementation of information technology and the effect of security breaches, computer viruses and computer hacking attacks;
our ability to comply with laws and regulations regarding privacy and protection of user data;
our ability to maintain our relationships with third party partners, providers, suppliers, vendors, distributors, contractors, financial institutions and licensing partners;
our beliefs and expectations regarding the seasonality of our cash balancesbusiness;
risks associated with litigation;
our ability to attract and cash generated from operating, investing,retain qualified employees;
our assessments and financing activities forestimates that determine our future liquidityeffective tax rate;
the impact of new or changing tax legislation on our business and capital resource needs.our ability to attract and retain customers;
our ability to develop, establish and maintain strong brands;
our ability to protect our intellectual property and the impact of any claim that we have infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; and
our ability to effectively integrate companies or assets that we acquire.
Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, and prospects to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties, and other factors include, among others, those identified under Item 1A, "Risk Factors," and elsewhere in this report. You should not rely on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect new information, events, or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.events, except as required by law.
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
General Overview
Blucora, Inc. ((referred to throughout this report as “Blucora”Blucora,” the "Company", "we," "us," or "our") is a Delaware corporation that was founded in 1996, and, through organic growth and strategic acquisitions, we have become a leading provider of technology-enabled financial solutions to consumers, small business owners, and tax professionals.
Our products and services in wealth management and tax preparation that we offer through HD Vest,HDV Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“HD Vest”) and TaxAct, Inc. and its subsidiary (“TaxAct”), respectively, help consumers to manage their financial lives.
HD Vest provides wealth management solutions to financial advisors, and their clients throughwho affiliate with HD Vest’s registered broker-dealer, investment adviser and/or insurance subsidiaries as independent contractors, an integrated, open platform that includes a broad variety of products offered through our brokerage, investment advisory, and insurance services to assist in making each financial advisor a financial service center for his/her clients. We regularly review the commissions and fees we charge for these products and services in light of the evolving regulatory and competitive environment and changes in client preferences and needs. We do not offer any proprietary products. As of December 31, 2016,2017, approximately 4,5004,000 advisors with branch offices in all 50 states were on theutilized our HD Vest platform and supportingsupported approximately $39.0$44.0 billion of assets for almost 350,000 clients. HD Vest generates revenue primarily through securities and insurance commissions, quarterly investment advisory fees based on assets under management, and other fees.
TaxAct provides affordable digital do-it-yourself (“DDIY”) tax preparation solutions for consumers and small business owners, and preparation software for tax professionals. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, TaxAct powered approximately 5,200,0004,500,000 consumer e-files and another 1,800,000 e-files through the 20,00021,000 tax professionals who used TaxAct to prepare and file their taxes or those of their clients. TaxAct generates revenue primarily through its online service at www.TaxAct.com. The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions, and Canada.
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BCOR.”
All references in this report to “Blucora,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” are to Blucora, Inc.
Our History
Blucora began in 1996 under the name InfoSpace, Inc. (“InfoSpace”). Over the next two decades, InfoSpace operated a number of digital businesses in search, directory, online commerce, media, and mobile infrastructure markets, with operations since 2008 focusing on internet search services and content (our “Search and Content” business).
In January 2012, InfoSpace Inc. acquired TaxAct, a leading provider of digital tax preparation solutions for consumers, small business owners, and tax professionals (our “Tax Preparation” business). In connection with this acquisition, InfoSpace Inc. changed its name to Blucora, Inc. in June 2012.
In August 2013, Blucora acquired Monoprice, Inc. (“Monoprice”), an e-commerce company whichthat sold self-branded electronics and accessories to both consumers and businesses (our “E-Commerce” business).
In July 2015, Blucora acquired SimpleTax Software Inc. (“SimpleTax”), a provider of online tax preparation services for individuals in Canada.
For further detail on these acquisitions, see "Note 3: Business Combinations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
On October 14, 2015, Blucorawe announced itsour plans to continue to operate itsour TaxAct subsidiary and to acquire HD Vest in order to focus on the technology-enabled financial solutions market (the “Strategic Transformation”). The acquisition of HD Vest closed on December 31, 2015. Through its registered broker-dealer, and registered investment advisoradviser, and insurance agency subsidiaries, HD Vest operates the largest U.S. tax-professional-oriented independent broker-dealer, providing wealth management solutions to financial advisors and their clients nationwide (our “Wealth Management” business). HDV Holdings, Inc. is the parent company of the Wealth Management business and owns all outstanding shares of HD Vest, Inc., which serves as a holding
company for our various financial services subsidiaries. Those subsidiaries include HD Vest Investment Securities, Inc. (a registered broker-dealer), HD Vest Advisory Services, Inc. (a registered investment advisor)adviser), and HD Vest Insurance Agency, LLC (three insurance agencies domiciled in Texas, Massachusetts, and Missouri)Montana). The Tax Preparation business consists of the operations of TaxAct, Inc. and its subsidiary ("TaxAct") and provides digital tax
preparation solutions for consumers, small business owners, and tax professionals through its website www.TaxAct.com (collectively referred to as the "Tax Preparation business" or the "Tax Preparation segment").
As part of the October 14, 2015 announcement, we also stated our plans to divest the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses. We completed both divestitures in 2016. Specifically, on August 9, 2016, we closed the sale of the Search and Content business to OpenMail LLC (“OpenMail”). On November 17, 2016, we closed the sale of the E-Commerce business to YFC-Boneagle Electric Co., Ltd (“YFC”). The results of operations of the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented in this report. See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information.
On October 27, 2016, as part of the Strategic Transformation and “One Company” operating model, Blucora announced plans to relocate its corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. The actions to relocate the corporate headquarters arewere intended to drive efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness. See "Note 5: Restructuring" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information. The restructuring is now substantially complete and it is expected to be completed by early 2018.
We have two reportable segments: the Wealth Management segment, which is comprised of the HD Vest business, and the Tax Preparation segment, which is comprised of the TaxAct business. See "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information on the Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses and their revenue. See "Note 13: Segment Information" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for information regarding revenue, operating income, and assets for our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses.
Business Overview
Wealth Management Business
Our Wealth Management business provides financial advisors, who affiliate with HD Vest’s registered broker-dealer and/or investment advisor subsidiaries as independent contractors, an integrated platform of brokerage, investment advisory, and insurance services to assist in making each financial advisor a financial service center for his/her clients. HD Vest generates revenue primarily through commissions, quarterly investment advisory fees based on assets under management, and other fees.
HD Vest was founded to help tax and accounting professionals integrate financial services into their practices. Unlike traditional independent broker-dealers who rely only on financial advisoryand/or investment advisers whose client relationships are limited to providing investment advice, most HD Vest advisors have long-standing tax advisory relationships that anchor their wealth management businesses. We believe that tax and accounting professionals, with their existing client relationships and in-depth knowledge of their clients’ financial situations, have a competitive advantage and are better positioned than competitors to provide tailored financial solutions that enable clients to meet their goals. HD Vest primarily recruits independent tax professionals with established tax practices and offers specialized training and support, which allows them to join the HD Vest platform as independent financial advisors. HD Vest has designed a learning management system for its advisors, branded VestU™, with curriculum that introduces advisors to the investment business and helps them build their practices. The comprehensive training curriculum is administered through numerous outlets, including an annual three-day national sales conference, approximately 600 specialized local training events held annually, and on-demand learning paths.
HD Vest's business model provides an open-architecture investment platform and technology tools to help financial advisors identify investment opportunities for their clients, while the long-standing tax advisory relationships provide a large client base of possible investment clients. This results in an experienced and stable network of financial advisors, who have multiple revenue-generating options to diversify their earnings sources.sources, and have access to HD Vest's innovative Mentor program and Chapter meetings. HD Vest also has a highly experienced home office team that is focused on solutions tailored to the advisor's practice. The home office team provides marketing, practice management, insurance and annuity, wealth management, compliance, succession planning, and other support to our advisors.
Tax Preparation Business
Our Tax Preparation business provides digital do-it-yourself (“DDIY”) tax preparation solutions for consumers, small business owners, and tax professionals. TaxAct generates revenue primarily through its online service at www.TaxAct.com.
TaxAct, a top-three provider of digital tax preparation solutions, based upon the number of e-files made in 2017, has leveraged its strong brand, comprehensive suite of tax preparation solutions, and proven online lead generation capabilities to enable the filing of more than 6064 million federal
consumer tax returns in the U.S. and Canada since 2000. TaxAct operates as the value player in its market, with a mission to empower people to navigate the complexities of tax preparation with ease and accuracy at a fair price.
TaxAct's offerings come with a price lock guarantee, whereby the price at the start of the tax return filing process is the price when the return is filed, rather than pricing the offering at the time that the tax return is filed. We believe this price lock guarantee ensures price transparency and differentiates TaxAct from its competitors. TaxAct also provides an accuracy guarantee, where, if an error in our software results in a smaller refund or larger tax liability than the customer would receive
using the same data with another tax preparation product, we will pay to the customer the difference in the refund or liability (up to $100,000) and refund the applicable software fees the customer paid us. In addition to these core offerings, TaxAct offers ancillary services such as refund payment transfer, data archive services, audit defense, stored value cards, and other add-on services. TaxAct's value propositionretirement investment accounts through HD Vest, and a marketplace for customers to take advantage of personalized tax and financial savings opportunities through third party product providers. TaxAct has an established reputation attract value-conscious customers away from competitor platforms and onto the TaxAct platform.that we believe is attractive to customers.
We had fourthree offerings for consumers for tax year 2015,2016, which is the basis for TaxAct's 20162017 operating results:
A "free" federal and state edition that handled simple returns,
A "basic" offering that contained all of the features of the free federal edition in addition to import capabilities, taxpayer phone support, and return preparation assistance tools,returns;
A "plus" offering that contained all of the basic offering features in addition to tools to maximize credits and deductions, and enhanced reporting,reporting; and
A "premium" offering that contained all of the plus offering features in addition to tools for self-employed individuals to maximize credits and deductions.
For the latter threeour offerings, state returns can be filed for free for free simple filers, or through the separately-sold state edition. We also had an offering for small business owners.
TaxAct’s professional tax preparer software allows professional tax preparers to prepare and file individual and business returns for their clients. TaxAct offers flexible pricing and packaging options that help tax professionals save money by paying only for what they need. In addition, the professional tax preparer software includes valuable features that tax professionals count on to maximize their efficiency and productivity, including the option of entering data directly into tax forms, utilizing the question-and-answer interview method to enter data, or easily toggling between the two data entry methods.
Discontinued Operations
We divested our Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses in 2016 as part of the Strategic Transformation. As such, our InfoSpace and Monoprice businesses have been classified as discontinued operations.
Our former Search and Content business, InfoSpace, primarily offered search services to users of its owned and operated and distribution partners’ web properties, as well as online content. Search services provided through its owned and operated web properties included services through websites such as Dogpile.com, WebCrawler.com, and HowStuffWorks.com. Search services provided to its distribution partners included services to a network of distribution partners through the respective web properties of those distribution partners. Search and Content revenue primarily consisted of advertising revenue generated through end-users clicking on paid listings included in the search result displays, as well as from advertisements appearing on the HowStuffWorks.com website. The paid listings, as well as algorithmic search results, were primarily supplied by Google, Yahoo!, and Bing, the “Search Customers.”
Our former E-Commerce business, Monoprice, was an online retailer of self-branded electronics and accessories to both consumers and businesses. Monoprice offered its products for sale through the www.monoprice.com website, where the majority of E-Commerce revenue was derived, and fulfilled those orders from its warehouses in Rancho Cucamonga, California and Hebron, Kentucky. Monoprice also sold products through reseller and marketplace agreements. Nearly all sales were to customers located in the United States.
Growth Strategy
Our evolving growth strategy for HD Vest and TaxAct includes participating in favorable industry trends and executing growth strategies that we believe will result in customer and advisor retention and growth beyond that of the broader markets in which we operate. Our approach is grounded on the belief that the best way to sustainably grow a business is to earn loyalty based on continuously delivering ever-greater value to target customers and clients.
Favorable Industry Trends
Wealth Management Industry Trends - We believe that HD Vest is and will be the beneficiary of several positive industry trends, including growth of investable assets driven by baby boomers’ retirement accounts, a continued migration to independent advisor channels, liquidity events and a continued shift toward household use of financial advisors.
Tax Preparation Industry Trends - TaxAct participates in the consumer DDIY tax preparation solutions market, which is the fastest growing segment in the tax preparation industry and is bolstered by a growing millennial population that continues to adopt technology-enabled financial solutions that drive value and ease in their everyday lives.lives, and we believe that tax simplification will drive digital consumer growth.
Executing our Growth Strategies
Brand Differentiation - A key objective of our strategy is to differentiate our HD Vest and TaxAct brands. It is important that our advisors, their clients, and our customers clearly identify and connect with our brands for the quality of products and services that we offer, as well as the values that we stand for.our values. In 2017, we expect to taketook initial steps in this effort, beginning in the tax season, and we expect to make additional investments over time. Additionally, we believe that the synergies between HD Vest and TaxAct will provide additional brand differentiation opportunities and strengthen our connection with our advisors, their clients, and our customers.
Innovate Continuously - As emerging technology and market trends change the way people manage their financial lives, our solutions also evolve. The retention and growth of our customer and advisor base are dependent, in part, upon our ability to deliver technology-enabled financial solutions that optimize user experience and capitalize on current technology, and provide innovations that integrate proven wealth management goals-based planning and portfolio management technology with tax planning and preparation technology.
Offer a Comprehensive Product Suite - The products and services offered by HD Vest and TaxAct constitute a comprehensive suite of financial solutions. We believe that continued expansion of financial solutions, whether proprietary or third party, will be a source of growth for each business. In addition, the combination of HD Vest and TaxAct provides meaningful cross-serving opportunities for both businesses, further contributing to customer and advisor retention and growth.
Continue to Provide Quality Customer Support, Education, and Training - A key element of our HD Vest business model is the ongoing education and training of tax professionals, which enables them to become financial advisors and effectively manage a growing wealth management practice. HD Vest provides these tax professionals with the resources and support to build confidence and competence, enabling them to grow assets under administration. The importance of quality customer support and education also flows through to our TaxAct business, where a seasoned tax support team provides support and education to consumers and tax professionals.
Research and Development
Our wealth management and tax preparation services are delivered primarily via software and online platforms. Since the markets for software and online technology are characterized by rapid technological change, shifting customer needs and frequent new product introductions and enhancements, a continuous high level of investment is required to innovate and quickly develop new products and services as well as enhance existing offerings. Our product development efforts are becoming more important than ever as people and businesses are increasingly connected by technology and expect access to services at any place or time. Our research and development expenses were $13.3 million in 2017, $13.7 million in 2016 (which includes research and development by the HD Vest business beginning on January 1, 2016), and $4.8 million in 2015, and $2.8 million in 2014.2015.
Seasonality
Our Tax Preparation business is highly seasonal, with a significant portion of our annual revenue for such services earned in the first four months of our fiscal year. During the third and fourth quarters, the Tax Preparation segment typically reports losses because revenue from the segment is minimal while core operating expenses continue. We anticipate that the seasonal nature of that part of the business will continue in the foreseeable future.
Competition
We face intense competition in all markets in which our businesses operate. Many of our competitors or potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories, more developed infrastructures, greater brand recognition, better access to vendors, and more established relationships. Our competitors may be able to adopt more aggressive pricing policies, develop and expand their product and service offerings more rapidly, adapt to new or emerging technologies more quickly, take advantage of acquisitions and other opportunities more readily, achieve greater economies of scale, and devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and services than we can. For our businesses to be successful, we must be competitive in the Wealth Management and Tax Preparation markets, as described in more detail below.
Wealth Management Competition
As a result of the HD Vest acquisition, we face additional competition in theThe wealth management industry which is a highly competitive global industry. We and our financial advisors compete directly with a variety of financial institutions, including traditional wirehouses, independent broker-dealers, registered investment advisors,advisers, asset managers, banks and insurance companies, and direct distributors.distributors such as 1st Global and Cetera Financial Group, as well as larger broker-dealers such as Raymond James Financial. Mergers and acquisitions have resulted in consolidation in the wealth management industry. As a result, many of our competitors may have greater financial resources, broader and deeper distribution capabilities, and a more comprehensive offering of products and services. We and our financial advisors compete directly with those companies for the provision of products and services to clients, as well as for retention and hiring of financial advisors.
We believe that our competitive position in the wealth management industry is a function of our ability to enable our advisors to offer investment guidance in the context of their clients' tax situations and more specifically to:
offer high-quality portfolio investment options and competitive product pricing;
offer a differentiated value proposition (in terms of brand recognition, reputation, and financial advisor payouts) that is sufficient to recruit and retain financial advisors;
offer products that are attractive to financial advisors and their clients;
negotiate competitive compensation arrangements with third-parties, including vendors, suppliers, and product sponsors;
develop and react to new technology, services, and regulation in the financial services industry; and
put in place a sufficient support and service network required to support our financial advisors and clients.
Tax Preparation Competition
Our TaxAct business operates in a very competitive marketplace. There are many competing software products and online services. Intuit’s TurboTax and H&R Block's DDIY consumer products and services have a significant percentage of the software and online service market. Our TaxAct business must also compete with alternate methods of tax preparation including "pencil and paper" do-it-yourself return preparation by individual filers andsuch as storefront tax preparation services, includingwhich includes both local tax preparers and large chains such as H&R Block, Liberty Tax, and Jackson Hewitt.Hewitt, and it may also be subject to new market entrants who may take some of our market share. Finally, our TaxAct business faces the risk that state or federal taxing agencies will offer software or systems to provide direct access for individual filers that will reduce the need for TaxAct’s software and services.
We believe that our competitive position in the market for tax preparation software and services is a function of our ability to:
differentiate our brand versus those of competitorscompetitors;
offer competitive pricing;
continue to offer high-quality, easy-to-use, and accessible software and services that are compelling to consumers;
market the software and services in a cost effective way; and
offer ancillary services that are attractive to users.
users, including enhanced tax and wealth management services through HD Vest.
Privacy and Security of Customer Information and Transactions
Our TaxAct business is subject to various federal, state and international laws and regulations and to financial institution and healthcare provider requirements relating to the privacy and security of the personal information of customers and employees. We are also subject to laws and regulations that apply to the Internet, behavioral tracking and advertising, mobile applications and messaging, telemarketing, email activities, data hosting and retention, financial and health information, and credit reporting. Additional laws in all of these areas are likely to be passed in the future, which could result in significant limitations on or changes to the ways in which we can collect, use, host, store, or transmit the personal information and data of our customers or employees, communicate with our customers, and deliver products and services, or may significantly increase our compliance costs. As our business expands to new industry segments and new uses of data that are regulated for privacy and security, or to countries outside the United States that have strict data protections laws, our compliance requirements and costs will increase.
Through a privacy policy framework designed to be consistent with globally recognized privacy principles, we comply with United States federal and other country guidelines and practices to help ensure that customers and employees are aware of, and can control, how we use information about them. The TaxAct.com website and its online products have been certified by TRUSTe, an independent organization that operates a website and online product privacy certification program representing industry standard practices to address users’ and regulators’ concerns about online privacy. We also use privacy statements to provide notice to customers of our privacy practices, as well as provide them the opportunity to furnish instructions with respect to use of their personal information. We participate in industry groups whose purpose is to develop or shape industry best practices, and to influence public policy for privacy and security.
To address security concerns, we use security safeguards to help protect the systems and the information customers give to us from loss, misuse and unauthorized alteration. Whenever customers transmit sensitive information, such as credit card information or tax return data, through one of our websites or products, we use industry standards to encrypt the data as it is transmitted to us. We work to protect our systems from unauthorized internal or external access using numerous commercially available computer security products as well as internally developed security procedures and practices.
HD Vest’s subsidiaries are subject to privacy regulation under federal and state law, which has been, and will continue to be, an area of focus for regulators.
Governmental Regulation
Blucora is a publicly traded company that is subject to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NASDAQ Global Select Market rules and regulations regarding public disclosure, financial reporting, internal controls, and corporate governance. The adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), have significantly expanded the nature and scope of these rules and regulations. Our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation segments are subject to federal and state government requirements, including regulations related to consumer protection, user privacy, security, pricing, taxation, intellectual property, labor, advertising, broker-dealers, securities, investment advisors,advisers, asset management, insurance, listing standards, and product and services quality.
Our Wealth Management segment is subject to certain additional financial industry regulations and supervision, including by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the Department of Labor (“DOL”), state securities and insurance regulators, and other regulatory authorities. Our Wealth Management subsidiary HD Vest Investment Securities, Inc. is a broker-dealer registered with the SEC, a member of FINRA, and is a participating member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. Broker-dealers and their representatives are subject to rules and regulations covering all aspects of the securities business, including sales and trading practices, public offerings, publication of research reports, use and safekeeping of clients’ funds and securities, capital adequacy, recordkeeping and reporting, the conduct of directors, officers, and employees, and general anti-fraud provisions. Broker-dealers and their representatives are also regulated by state securities administrators in those jurisdictions where they do business. Compliance with many of the rules and regulations applicable to us involves a number of risks, because rules and regulations frequently change and are subject to varying interpretations, among other reasons. Regulators make periodic examinations of our broker-dealer operations and review annual, monthly, and other reports on our operations and financial condition. Violations of rules and regulations governing a broker-dealer’s actions could result in censure, penalties and fines, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, the restriction, suspension, or expulsion from the securities industry of such broker-dealer, its financial advisor(s)representatives or its officers or employees, or other similar adverse consequences.
Our Wealth Management subsidiary, HD Vest Advisory Services, Inc. is registered with the SEC as an investment advisoradviser and is subject to the requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, including examination by the SEC’s staff.thereunder. Such requirements relate to, among other things, fiduciary duties to clients, advisory fees, maintaining an effective compliance program, solicitation arrangements, conflicts of interest, advertising, limitations on agency cross and principal transactions between the advisor and advisory clients, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, and general anti-fraud provisions. The SEC periodically examines our investment adviser operations and reviews annual, monthly, and other reports on our operations and financial condition. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act and other federal securities laws, ranging from fines and censure to termination of an investment advisor’sadviser’s registration. Investment advisorsadviser representatives also are subject to certain state securities laws and regulations. Failure to comply with the Advisers Act or other federal and state securities laws and regulations could result in investigations, sanctions, profit disgorgement, fines, or other similar adverse consequences.
CertainOur Wealth Management subsidiaries offer certain products and services offered by our Wealth Management subsidiaries are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), and to regulations promulgated under ERISA or the Code, insofar as they provide services with respect to plan clients, or otherwise deal with plan clients that are subject to ERISA or the Code. ERISA imposes certain duties on persons who are “fiduciaries” (as defined in Section 3(21) of ERISA) and prohibits certain transactions involving plans subject to ERISA and fiduciaries or other service providers to such plans. Non-compliance with these provisions may expose an ERISA fiduciary or other service provider to liability under ERISA, which may include monetary penalties as well as equitable remedies for the affected plan. Section 4975 of the Code prohibits certain transactions involving plans (as defined in Section 4975(e)(1), which includes individual retirement accounts and Keogh plans) and service providers, including fiduciaries, to such plans. Section 4975 imposes excise taxes for violations of these prohibitions.
In April 2016, the DOL adopted regulations changing(the “DOL fiduciary rule”) expanding the definition of who is a fiduciary under ERISA, and specifying how such fiduciaries must provide investment advice to account holders in ERISA plans, individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”), and certain other types of accounts described in the Code (collectively, “Covered Accounts”). The rules bringDOL fiduciary rule as currently drafted brings virtually all of the investment products and services HD Vest currently provides to IRA owners within the scope of ERISA. If the DOL rule were to become applicable on April 10, 2017, as it does by its current terms, itERISA and would require HD Vest to either: (1) subject suchmake significant changes to its policies, procedures and products with respect to Covered Accounts to a level fee arrangement under which (a) the firm and affiliates receive a fee based on a fixed percentage of the value of assets in the account and (b) no ERISA prohibited transactions are otherwise implicated; or (2) comply with one ofAccounts. In November 2017, however, the DOL prohibited transaction exemptions that impose significant new and additional compliance and disclosure requirements, and restrictformally delayed the manner in which HD Vest can earn revenue and pay its financial advisors. On February 3, 2017, President Trump issued a memorandum directing the Secretaryeffective date of Labor to examinekey portions of the DOL fiduciary rule make certain determinations regardinguntil July 2019. The purpose of this delay is to allow the rule’s impact,DOL time
to review and based onpotentially substantially revise the outcomefiduciary rule, and to facilitate coordination between the DOL and SEC potentially to promulgate uniform standards of that review potentially publish a proposed rule rescinding or revising the rule. Accordingly, itconduct for all financial professionals. It is uncertain whetherwhat further actions the ruleDOL or SEC will become applicable,take with respect to these matters or when itany further rulemaking will be applicable,complete or effective. During this delay, HD Vest, when dealing with Covered Accounts, must follow the DOL’s Impartial Conduct Standards, which require HD Vest to act in the best interest of investors in Covered Accounts, charge no more than reasonable compensation, and what form any final regulation might take after the required review is completed.avoid making material misrepresentations. See the section entitled "Risks Associated With our Businesses" in Part I Item 1A of this report for more information about the risks associated with future regulations and their potential impact on our operations.
Our Tax Preparation segment is subject to federal and state government requirements, including regulations related to the electronic filing of tax returns, the provision of tax preparer assistance, and the use and disclosure of customer information. We also offer certain other products and services to small businesses and consumers, which are also subject to regulatory requirements. As we expand our products and services, both domestically and internationally, we may become subject to additional government regulation. Further, regulators may adopt new laws or regulations or their interpretation of existing laws or regulations may differ from ours or expand to cover additional products and services. These increased regulatory requirements could impose higher regulatory compliance costs, limitations on our ability to provide some services in some states or countries, and liabilities that might be incurred through lawsuits or regulatory penalties. See the section entitled "Risks Associated With our Businesses" in Part I Item 1A of this report for additional information regarding the potential impact of governmental regulation on our operations and results.
The Trump Administration has called for a broad review of, and potentially significant changes to, U.S. fiscal and tax laws and regulations. These changes may includehave resulted in comprehensive tax reform as well asand include the rolling back or repeal of various financial regulations, including the DOL fiduciary rule and the Dodd-Frank Act. We cannot predict the impact, if any, of these changes to our businesses. However, it is possible that some policies adopted by the new administration will benefit us and others will negatively affect us. Until we know what changes are enacted, we will not know whether in total we benefit from, or are negatively affected by, the changes.
We are subject to federal and state laws and government regulations concerning employee safety and health and environmental matters. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other federal and state agencies have the authority to promulgate regulations that may have an impact on our operations.
See the section entitled "Risks Associated With our Businesses" in Part I, Item 1A of this report for additional information regarding risks related to governmental regulation of our business.
Intellectual Property
Our success depends upon our technology and intellectual property rights. We seek to protect such rights and the value of our corporate brands and reputation through a variety of measures, including: domain name registrations, confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with employees and third parties, protective contractual provisions, and laws regarding copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. We hold multiple registered trademarks in the United States and in various foreign countries, and we may apply for additional trademarks as business needs require. We may not be successful in obtaining issuance or registration for such applications or in maintaining existing trademarks. In addition, registered marks may not provide us with any competitive advantages. We may be unable to adequately or cost-effectively protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, and failure to do so could weaken our competitive position and negatively impact our business and financial results. If others claim that our products infringe their intellectual property rights, we may be forced to seek expensive licenses, re-engineer our products, engage in expensive and time-consuming litigation, or stop marketing and licensing our products. See the section entitled "Risks Associated With our Businesses" in Part I Item 1A of this report for additional information regarding protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights by us and third parties against us.
Employees
As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had 476487 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we consider employee relations to be positive. There is significant competition for qualified personnel in the industries in which we operate, particularly for software development and other technical staff. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to hire and retain qualified personnel.
Acquisitions
Our acquisition of HD Vest closed on December 31, 2015. TaxAct acquired SimpleTax Software Inc. (“SimpleTax”) on July 2, 2015. For further detail on these acquisitions, see "Note 3: Business Combinations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Company Internet Site and Availability of SEC Filings
Our corporate website is located at www.blucora.com. We make available on that site, as soon as reasonably practicable, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, proxy statements, Current Reports on Form 8-K, other reports filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, as well as any amendments to those filings. Our SEC filings, as well as our Code of Ethics and Conduct and other corporate governance documents, can be found in the Investor Relations section of our site and
are available free of charge. Information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, the SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding us and other issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITHOUR STRATEGIC TRANSFORMATIONOur business and future results may be affected by a number of risks and uncertainties that should be considered carefully. In addition, this report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks described below. The occurrence of one or more of the events listed below could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, results of operations, reputation, financial condition, cash flows or ability to continue current operations without any direct or indirect impairment or disruption, which is referred to throughout these Risk Factors as a “Material Adverse Effect.”
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESSES |
|
As a result of the HD Vest Acquisition, we may face significant disruptions, business conflicts, inefficiencies, and other related risks. |
We may not be able to achieve the anticipated benefits of our Strategic Transformation, which could have a Material Adverse Effect.On October 14, 2015, we announced that Blucora had enteredour Strategic Transformation plans. The Strategic Transformation refers to our transformation into a definitive agreement to acquire HDV Holdings, Inc., the holdingtechnology-enabled financial solutions company for the groupcomprised of companies that comprise the Wealth Management business, for $613.7 million (the “TaxAct and HD Vest Acquisition”). For further discussionand the divestitures of our Search and Content business that was operated through our former InfoSpace LLC subsidiary and our E-Commerce business that consisted of the termsoperations of Monoprice, Inc. in 2016. As part of the HD Vest Acquisition, see the "Strategic Transformation" sectionStrategic Transformation and our model of operating as "One Company," we relocated our corporate headquarters in Part II Item 7 and "Note 3: Business Combinations" of the Notes2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this annual report. Irving, Texas.
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the HD Vest Acquisition (includingStrategic Transformation, including the expected operational, revenue, and cost synergies, withand other business synergies between our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businessbusinesses and the level of revenue and profitability growth that we are expecting),expecting, whether attributable to regulatory limitations, operational realities, or otherwise. In addition, we have incurred and may continue to incur liabilities in connection with the Strategic Transformation, including liabilities from retention bonuses, severance payments, early termination or assignment of contracts, potential failure to meet obligations due to loss of employees or resources, and resulting litigation. We may also face difficulties, including loss of key employees,personnel, disruptions in our ongoing operations, and diversion of our and HD Vest’s management’s attention from ongoing operations and opportunities, as we continue to integrate theour operations, technologies, products, services, IT systems, controls, benefit plans, and policies and proceduresprocedures. If we are not able to achieve the anticipated benefits of HD Vest.the Strategic Transformation, it could have a Material Adverse Effect.
In addition, notwithstanding the due diligence investigationconnection with our Strategic Transformation, we performedhave had a leadership transition and have replaced nearly all of our executive officers (excluding our Chief Executive Officer). While many of our executive officers have relevant industry experience, they are new to our Company. In addition, in connection with the HD Vest Acquisition, HD Vest may have liabilities, losses, or other exposures (including regulatory risks) for which we do not have adequate insurance coverage, indemnification, or other protection.
|
|
The failure to retain key management and to hire, retain and motivate highly qualified employees, would have a material adverse effect on our business. |
We recently announced a leadership transition at HD Vest. The failure to retain key management responsible for the operations of HD Vest beyond this transition could materially and adversely impact those operations, particularly due to the fact that our management team at the corporate level lacks significant experience in the financial services industry. Even if we retain HD Vest’s key management and other employees, we will need to attract and retain additional management resources to continue implementing our change in strategy to a company focused on the technology-enabled financial solutions market.
On October 27, 2016, the Company announced that it anticipates relocating its headquarters to the State of Texas during 2017. As part of the relocation, we expect to replacehave also replaced nearly all of our corporate employees. Changes in senior management and employee transitions are inherently disruptive and can be difficult to manage, and efforts to implement any new strategic or operating goals may not succeed in the absence of a long-term management team. Periods of transition in senior management leadership are often difficult as the new executives gain detailed knowledge of our operations and due to cultural differences that may result from changes in strategy and style. Our lack of consistent leadership that is experienced with our Company may cause concerns to third parties with whom we do business, and may increase the likelihood of turnover of our employees and, in the case of our Wealth Management business, turnover of advisors. If we are not effective in managing these leadership and employee transitions, our business could be adversely impacted and could have Material Adverse Effect.
The Tax Preparation and Wealth Management markets are very competitive, and failure to effectively compete could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
Our Tax Preparation business operates in a very competitive marketplace. There are many competing software products and online services. Intuit’s TurboTax and H&R Block’s products and services have a significant percentage of the software and online service market. Our Tax Preparation business must also compete with alternate methods of tax preparation, such as storefront tax preparation services, which includes both local tax preparers and large chains such as H&R Block, Liberty Tax, and Jackson Hewitt, and it may also be subject to new market entrants who may take some of our market share. Finally, our Tax Preparation business faces the risk that state or federal taxing agencies will offer software or systems to provide direct access for individual filers that will reduce the need for TaxAct’s software and services. As digital do-it-yourself tax preparation continues to be characterized by intense competition, including heavy marketing expenditures, price-based
competition, and new entrants, maintaining and growing share becomes more challenging unless brand relevance, customer experience, and feature/functionality provide meaningful incremental value. If we cannot continue to offer software and services that have quality and ease-of-use that are compelling to consumers; market the software and services in a cost-effective manner; offer ancillary services that are attractive to users; and develop the software and services at a low enough cost to be able to offer them at a competitive price point, it could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
Our Tax Preparation business also faces potential competition from the public sector, where we face the risk of federal and state taxing authorities developing software or other systems to facilitate tax return preparation and electronic filing at no charge to taxpayers. These or similar programs may be introduced or expanded in the future, which may cause us to lose customers and revenue. Although the Free File Alliance, which is an Internal Revenue Service partnership that provides free electronic tax filing services to taxpayers meeting certain income-based guidelines, has kept the federal government from being a direct competitor to our tax offerings, we anticipate that governmental encroachment at both the federal and state levels may present a continued competitive threat to our business for the foreseeable future. The current agreement with the exceptionFree File Alliance is scheduled to expire in October 2020.
The wealth management industry in which our Wealth Management business also operates is highly competitive, and we may not be able to maintain our customers, financial advisors, distribution network, or the terms on which we provide our products and services. Our Wealth Management business competes based on a number of factors, including name recognition, service, the quality of investment advice, investment performance, technology, product offerings and features, price, and perceived financial strength. Competitors in the wealth management industry include broker-dealers, banks, asset managers, insurers, and other financial institutions. Many of these competitors have greater market share, offer a broader range of products, and have greater financial resources. In addition, over time certain sectors of the wealth management industry have become considerably more concentrated, as financial institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. This consolidation could result in our competitors gaining greater resources, and we may experience pressures on our pricing and market share as a result of these factors and as some of our Chief Executive Officercompetitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices. In addition, our Wealth Management business seeks to differentiate itself on the basis of offering tax-smart investing advice and certain positionssolutions. There is no guarantee that this differentiation will be eliminated as partmeaningful to our customers and potential customers, or that another competitor will not adopt a similar strategy more effectively. In either case, our ability to compete effectively in the market could be damaged.
Poor service or performance of the financial products we offer or competitive pressures on pricing of such services or products may cause our Wealth Management business customers to withdraw assets on short notice.
Customer service and investment performance are important factors in the success of our restructure. We are engaged in a search process to identify, evaluateWealth Management business. Strong customer service and select new employeesinvestment performance help increase customer retention and generate sales of products and services. In contrast, poor service or investment performance could impair our revenues and earnings, as well as our prospects for each position moving to Texas, but theregrowth. Customers can terminate their relationships with us or our financial advisors at will. There can be no assurance as to how future investment performance will compare to that we will fill every positionof our competitors, and historical performance is not indicative of future returns. A decline or perceived decline in investment performance, on an absolute or relative basis, could cause a timely manner or at all. decline in sales of mutual funds and other investment products, an increase in redemptions and the termination of asset management relationships. Such actions may reduce our aggregate amount of assets under management and reduce management fees. Poor investment performance could also adversely affect our ability to expand the distribution of our products through independent financial advisors.
In addition, while we have put an enhanced retention programthe emergence of new financial products or services from others, or competitive pressures on pricing of such services or products, may result in place to ensure the orderly transitionloss of accounts in our Wealth Management business. We must also monitor the pricing of our key employees, thereservices and financial products in relation to competitors and periodically may need to adjust commission and fee rates, interest rates on deposits and margin loans, and other fee structures to remain competitive. Competition from other financial services firms, such as reduced commissions to attract customers or trading volume, direct-to-investor online financial services, or higher deposit interest rates to attract customer cash balances, could adversely impact our business. Customers of our Wealth Management business can be no assurance thatalso reduce the retention program will be successful at retainingaggregate amount of their assets managed by us or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures, for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in investment preferences, changes in our key employees through(or our financial advisors’) reputation in the move date. Themarketplace, changes in customer management or ownership, loss of key employees beforeinvestment management personnel and financial market performance. A reduction in managed assets and decrease in revenues and earnings from any of these events, could have a suitable replacement isMaterial Adverse Effect.
Changes in place may disrupt operations,domestic and international economic, political and other factors could have a Material Adverse Effect on our business.
Our Wealth Management business operates in the United States and global financial markets, and our Tax Preparation business offers tax filing services in the United States federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and Canada. Accordingly, we are affected by United States and global economic and political conditions that directly and indirectly impact a number of factors in the domestic and global financial markets and economies, which may materiallybe detrimental to our operating results. In addition, because the significant majority of our revenue is derived within the United States, economic conditions in the United States have an even greater impact on us than companies with a more diverse international presence.
Domestic and adverselyinternational factors that could affect our business and financial results.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESSES
|
|
Our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by market fluctuations and by economic, political, and other factors. |
Our financial condition and results of operations have been, and mayinclude, but are not limited to, trading levels, investing, origination activity in the future be, materiallysecurities markets, security and adversely affected by market conditionsunderlying asset valuations, the absolute and by economic and other factors. Such factors, which can be global, national or local in nature, include: political, social, economic and market conditions; the availability and cost of capital (whether debt or equity); therelative level and volatility of equity prices, commodity pricesinterest and interestcurrency rates, currencyreal estate values, the actual and other market indices; technological changesperceived quality of issuers and events; U.S.borrowers, the supply of and demand for loans and deposits, United States and foreign government fiscal and tax policies; U.S.policies, United States and foreign government ability, real or perceived, to avoid defaulting on government securities; inflation; investor sentiment and confidence in the financial markets;securities, inflation, decline and stress or recession in the U.S.United States and global economies generally;generally, terrorism and armed conflicts;conflicts, and natural disasters such as weather catastrophes and widespread health emergencies. Furthermore, changes in consumer economic variables, such as the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment, decreases in property values, certain life events, and the level of consumer confidence and consumer debt, may substantially affect consumer loan levels and credit quality, which,quality.
While United States and global financial markets have, at a macro level, recently experienced growth, uncertainty and potential volatility remain. A period of sustained downturns and/or volatility in turn,the securities markets, prolonged continuation of the artificially low level of short-term interest rates, a return to increased credit market dislocations, reductions in the value of real estate, and other negative market factors could impact client activityhave a Material Adverse Effect on our business. We could experience a decline in allcommission revenue from lower trading volumes, a decline in fees from reduced portfolio values of securities managed on behalf of our businesses. These factorscustomers, a reduction in revenue from capital markets and advisory transactions due to reduced activity, increased credit provisions and charge-offs, losses sustained from our customers’ and market participants’ failure to fulfill their settlement obligations, reduced net interest earnings, and other losses. Periods of reduced revenue and other losses could be accompanied by periods of reduced profitability because certain of our expenses, including, but not limited to, our interest expense on debt, rent, facilities and salary expenses are fixed and, our ability to reduce them over short time periods is limited.
Other more specific trends may also affect our financial condition and results of operations, including, for example: changes in the mix of products preferred by investors that may have ancause increases or decreases in our fee revenues associated with such products, depending on whether investors gravitate towards or away from such products. The timing of such trends, if any, and their potential impact on our ability to achievefinancial condition and results of operations are beyond our strategic objectives.control.
In particular, because the significant majority of our Tax Preparation business revenue and all of our Wealth Management business revenue is derived from sales within the U.S., economic conditions in the U.S. have an even greater impact on us than companies with a more diverse international presence.
Challenging economic times and changes to the tax code (personal and/or corporate), such as the recent changes passed under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, could cause potential new customers not to purchase or to delay purchasing of our products and services, and could cause our existing customers to discontinue purchasing or delay upgrades of our existing products and services, thereby negatively impacting our revenues and future financial results. Poor economic conditions and high unemployment have caused, and could in the future cause, a significant decrease in the number of tax returns filed, which may have a significant effect on the number of tax returns we prepare and file. In addition, weakness in the end-user consumer and small business markets could negatively affect the cash flow of our distributors and resellers who could, in turn, delay paying their obligations to us, which could increase our credit risk exposure and cause delays in our recognition of revenue or future sales to these customers. Any of these events could materially harm our businesshave a Material Adverse Effect. See "We may be negatively impacted by the recently passed Tax Cuts and ourJobs Act or by any future financial results. In addition, the Trump Administration has calledchanges in tax laws" for a broad reviewdiscussion of and potentially significantrisks related to changes to, to U.S. fiscal and tax laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Dodd-Frank Act. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new U.S. federal laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be issued, nor is the impact of such changes on our Tax Preparation or Wealth Management businesses clear. It is possible that some policies adopted by the new administration will benefit us and others will negatively affect us. Until we know what changes are enacted, we will not know whether in total we benefit from, or are negatively affected by, the changes.
In addition, our Wealth Management business operates in the U.S. and global capital and credit markets and derives a substantial portiontax code.
Each of its revenue from fees based on client assets. Therefore, fluctuations in the U.S. and global equity and debt markets can have a significant impact on HD Vest’s revenues and earnings. As a result, these factors could materiallyimpact customer activity in all of our businesses and adverselyhave a Material Adverse Effect. In addition, these factors also may have an impact on our financial conditionability to achieve our strategic objectives and results of operations.to grow our business.
We believe that investment performance is an important factor in the success of our Wealth Management business. Poor investment performance could impair our revenues and earnings, as well as our prospects for growth. Clients do not have long-term obligations to us and can terminate their relationships with us or our financial advisors at will. Our clients can also reduce the aggregate amount of their assets managed by us or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures, for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in investment preferences, changes in our (or our financial advisors’) reputation in the marketplace, changes in client management or ownership, loss of key investment management personnel and financial market performance. A reduction in managed assets, and the associated decrease in revenues and earnings, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and financial results.
|
|
| If we are unable to attract and retain productive advisors, our financial results will be negatively impacted. |
Our Wealth Management business derives a large portion of its revenues from commissions and fees generated by its advisors. Our ability to attract and retain productive advisors has contributed significantly to our growth and success. If we fail to attract new advisors or to retain and motivate our current advisors, our business may suffer. In addition, the wealth management industry in general is experiencing a decline in the number of younger financial advisors entering the industry. We are not immune to that industry trend. If we are unable to replace our advisors whoas they retire, or to assist our retiring advisors with transitioning their practices to existing advisors.advisors, we could experience a decline in revenue and earnings.
The market for productive advisors is highly competitive, and we devote significant resources to attracting and retaining the most qualified advisors. In attracting and retaining advisors, we compete directly with a variety of financial institutions such as wirehouses, regional broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies and other independent broker-dealers.
Financial industry competitors are increasingly offering guaranteed contracts, upfront payments, and greater compensation to attract successful financial advisors. These can be important factors in a current advisor’s decision to leave us as well as in a prospective advisor’s decision to join us. If we are not successful in retaining highly qualified advisors, we may not be able to recover the expense involved in attracting and training these individuals. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to attract and retain the advisors needed to achieve our growth objectives. Moreover, the costs associated with successfully attracting and retaining advisors could be significant and there is no assurance that we will generate sufficient revenues from those advisors’ business to offset those costs.
In addition, as some of HD Vest’s advisors grow their assets under management, they may decide to disassociate from HD Vest to establish their own registered investment advisers (“RIAs”) and take customers and associated assets into those businesses. HD Vest seeks to deter advisors from taking this route by continuously evaluating its technology, product offerings, and service, as well as its advisor compensation, fees, and pay-out policies, to ensure that HD Vest is competitive in the market and attractive to successful advisors. We may not be successful in dissuading such advisors from forming their own RIAs, which could cause a material volume of customer assets to leave HD Vest’s platform, which would reduce our revenues and could cause a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
Future revenue growth depends upon our ability to adapt to technological change and successfully introduce new and enhanced products and services. |
Future revenue growth depends upon our ability to adapt to technological change and successfully introduce new and enhanced products and services.
The tax preparation and wealth management industries are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry and security standards, and frequent new product introductions. Our competitors in suchthese industries offer new and enhanced products and services every year. Consequently, clientcustomer expectations are constantly changing. We must successfully innovate and develop or offer new products and features to meet evolving clientcustomer needs and demands, while continually updating our technology infrastructure. We must devote significant resources to continue to developdeveloping our skills, tools, and capabilities in order to capitalize on existing and emerging technologies. Our inability to quickly and effectively innovate our products, services, and infrastructure could harmresult in a Material Adverse Effect.
We have recently begun offering our business and financial results. Our Tax Preparation business also faces potential competition from the public sector, where we face the risk of federal and state taxing authorities developing software or other systems to facilitate tax return preparation and electronic filing at no charge to taxpayers. These or similar programs may be introduced or expanded in the future, which may cause us to lose customers and revenue. Although the Free File Alliance has kept the federal government from being a direct competitor to our tax offerings, we anticipate that governmental encroachment at both the federal and state levels may present a continued competitive threat to our business for the foreseeable future. The current agreement with the Free File Alliance is scheduled to expire in October 2020.
Our online tax preparation products and services have historically been provided through desktop computers, but the number of people who access similar offerings throughour mobile devices has increased dramatically in the past few years.app. We have limited experience to date in mobile platform development, and our existing user experience may not be compelling on mobile devices. Given the speed at which new devices and platforms are being released, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in developing versions ofconnection with our products and services for use on newly developed devices,mobile app, and we may need to devote significant resources to the creation, support, and maintenance of new user experiences. If our customers don’t deem our new mobile app user friendly or if they deem our competitors’ mobile app more user friendly or better than ours, our market share will decline, which could have a Material Adverse Effect. In addition, we regularly make upgrades to the technology we use for our tax preparation product that are expected to provide a better user experience and help us to keep existing customers or attract new customers. If our mobile app or the other upgrades we make to the technology we use in our Tax Preparation business are not successful, it could result in wasted development costs, damage to our brands and market share, any of which could have a Material Adverse Effect.
Our business depends on fees generated from the distribution of financial products and fees earned from management of advisory accounts.
A large portion of our revenues are derived from fees generated from the distribution of financial products, such as mutual funds and variable annuities. Changes in the structure or amount of the fees paid by the sponsors of these products could directly affect our revenues, business and financial condition. In addition, if these products experience losses or increased investor redemptions, we may receive lower fee revenue from the investment management and distribution services we provide on behalf of the mutual funds and annuities. The investment management fees we are slowpaid may also decline over time due to developfactors such as increased competition, renegotiation of contracts and the introduction of new, lower-priced investment products and services. Changes in market values or in the fee structure of asset management accounts would affect our revenues, business and financial condition. Asset management fees often are primarily comprised of base management and incentive fees. Management fees are primarily based on assets under management, which are impacted by net inflow/outflow of customer assets and market values. Below-market investment performance by our funds and portfolio managers could result in a loss of managed accounts and could result in reputational damage that might make it more difficult to attract new customers and thus further impact our business and financial condition. If we were to experience the loss of managed accounts, our fee revenue would decline. In addition, in periods of declining market values, our asset values under management may also decline, which would negatively impact our fee revenues and could have a Material Adverse Effect.
Government regulation of our business, including increased regulation or the interpretation of existing laws, rules or regulations, could have a Material Adverse Effect.
We are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations that affect our business, such as financial services, data privacy and security requirements, tax, digital content, employment, consumer protection and fraud protection, among others.In addition, there have been significant new regulations and heightened focus by the government on many of the laws and regulations that affect our both our Wealth Management and our Tax Preparation businesses, as well as in areas such as insurance and healthcare. As we complete our Strategic Transformation and expand our products and services and revise our business models, we may become subject to additional government regulation or increased regulatory scrutiny. Regulators may adopt new laws or regulations or their interpretation of existing laws or regulations may differ from ours as well as the laws of other jurisdictions in which we operate, and if we are found to not be in compliance with certain laws, rules or regulations, it could have a Material Adverse Effect. Increased or new regulatory requirements or changes in the interpretation of existing laws, rules or regulations could, among other things, result in penalties or fines, impose significant limitations, require changes to our business, require certain notifications to customers, customers, or employees, restrict our use of personal information, cause our customers cease utilizing our products or services, could make our business more costly, less efficient, or impossible to conduct, may require us to modify our current or future products or services in a manner that is detrimental to our business and could result in additional compliance costs, which could have a Material Adverse Effect
The Trump Administration has called for a broad review of, and potentially significant changes to, certain U.S. laws and regulations, including but not limited to the U.S. tax code, the Department of Labor (the "DOL") fiduciary rule (the "Fiduciary Rule") and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"), which could result in changes that negatively affect us. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent any new or changes to existing U.S. federal laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be issued or the impact of any such changes on our Tax Preparation or Wealth Management businesses. See “The recently passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act could have a Material Adverse Effect” for additional risks recent changes in tax laws.
The tax preparation industry continues to receive heightened attention from federal and state governments. New legislation, regulation, public policy considerations, changes in the cybersecurity environment, litigation by the government or private entities, new interpretations of existing laws may result in greater oversight of the tax preparation industry, restrict the types of products and services that we can offer or the prices we can charge, or otherwise cause us to change the way we operate our Tax Preparation business or offer our tax preparation products and services. We may not be able to respond quickly to such regulatory, legislative and other developments, and these changes may in turn increase our cost of doing business and limit our revenue opportunities. In addition, if our practices are compatiblenot consistent with new interpretations of existing laws, rules or regulations, we may become subject to lawsuits, penalties, fines and other liabilities that did not previously apply. We are also required to comply with Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) requirements and a variety of state revenue agency standards. Requirements imposed by the FTC or state agencies, including new requirements or their interpretation of existing laws, rules or regulations, could be burdensome on our business, cause us to lose market share due to product changes we are required to implement or may significantly increase the costs of providing those services to our customers and may prevent us from delivering a quality product to our customers in a timely manner and at an acceptable price, all of which could have a Material Adverse Effect. In addition, in our Tax Preparation business, we generate revenue from certain financial products related to our tax preparation software and services. These products include prepaid debit cards on which a tax filer may receive his or her tax refund and the ability of certain of our users to have the fees for our services deducted from their tax refund. Any regulation of these products by state or federal governments, or any competing products offered by state and federal tax collection agencies, could materially and adversely impact our revenue from these financial products.
In addition, we are subject to laws, regulations, and industry rules relating to the collection, use, and security of user data. We expect regulation in this area to increase, and our current data protection policies and practices may not be sufficient and thus may require modification. We have incurred, and may continue to incur, significant expenses to comply with privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards, and contractual obligations.
Our ability to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and interpretations is largely dependent on our establishment and maintenance of compliance, audit, and reporting systems and procedures, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified compliance, audit, and risk management personnel. While we have adopted systems, policies, and procedures reasonably designed to comply or facilitate compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and interpretations, these systems, policies, and procedures may not be fully effective. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to investigations, claims, or other actions or proceedings by regulators or third-parties with respect to our past or future compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations, the outcome of which may have a Material Adverse Effect.
If we fail to comply with applicable laws, rules, regulations and guidance, such failure could have a Material Adverse Effect. See “Our Wealth Management business is subject to extensive regulation, and failure to comply with these new devices, particularly ifregulations could have a Material Adverse Effect" for additional information regarding the regulation of our business.
Our Wealth Management business is subject to extensive regulation, and failure to comply with these regulations could have a Material Adverse Effect.
Our Wealth Management business is heavily regulated by multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the DOL, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, state securities and insurance regulators, and other regulatory authorities. Failure to comply with these regulators’ laws, rules, and regulations could result in the restriction of the ongoing conduct or growth, or even liquidation of, parts of our business and otherwise cause a Material Adverse Effect.
The regulatory environment in which our Wealth Management business operates is continually evolving, and the level of financial regulation to which we cannot do so as quickly asare subject has generally increased in recent years. Among the most significant regulatory changes affecting our competitors, ourWealth Management business is the Dodd-Frank Act, which mandates broad changes in the supervision and regulations of the wealth management industry. Regulators implementing the Dodd-Frank Act have adopted, proposed to adopt, and may in the future adopt regulations that could impact the manner in which we will market share will decline. In addition, such newHD Vest products and services, manage HD Vest operations, and interact with regulators. In addition, the Trump Administration has called for a broad review of, and potentially significant changes to, U.S. fiscal laws and regulations, including the Dodd-Frank Act. If such changes are enacted, they could negatively impact our Wealth Management business and cause a Material Adverse Effect.
In 2016, the DOL enacted the Fiduciary Rule, which redefines who may be considered a fiduciary under ERISA and how such fiduciaries must provide investment advice to individual retirement accounts or other accounts, the assets of which are subject to section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (collectively, the "Covered Accounts"). During 2017, Covered Accounts made up over half of the assets under administration in our Wealth Management business. The Fiduciary Rule will bring virtually all of the investment products and services that our Wealth Management business currently provides to Covered Account owners within the scope of ERISA.
The DOL has delayed the effective date of key portions of the Fiduciary Rule to July 2019. Other portions of the Fiduciary Rule, however, remain in effect, including the Impartial Conduct Standards. The purpose of the delay is to permit the DOL to reassess the Fiduciary Rule, as well as to facilitate coordination between the DOL and the SEC on rulemaking toward possible uniform standards of conduct for all investment professionals. We cannot predict if and when the DOL or the SEC will complete any such rulemaking or what it will entail. Should the DOL or SEC adopt new standards of conduct and other requirements that heighten the duties of broker-dealers or investment advisers, it could result in additional compliance costs, lesser compensation, and management distraction, all of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on our business. Because the DOL’s Impartial Conduct Standards remain in effect, our Wealth Management business is required to continue good faith efforts to conform its business to these standards. Because Covered Accounts comprise a significant portion of our business, our failure to successfully conform to these standards could negatively impact our results due to increased costs related to compliance, legal and information technology changes.
Our Wealth Management business distributes its products and services through financial advisors who affiliate with us as independent contractors. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial, or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change, or at least challenge, the classification of our financial advisors as independent contractors. Although we believe we have properly classified our advisors as independent contractors, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other U.S. federal or state authorities or similar authorities may determine that we have misclassified our advisors as independent contractors for employment tax or other purposes and, as a result, seek additional taxes from us or attempt to impose fines and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, the SEC and FINRA have extensive rules and regulations with respect to capital requirements. As a registered broker-dealer, our Wealth Management business is subject to Rule 15c3-1 (the “Net Capital Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and related requirements of self-regulatory organizations, which specify minimum capital requirements that are intended to ensure the general soundness and liquidity of broker-dealers. As a result of the Net Capital Rule, our ability to withdraw capital from our subsidiaries that comprise our Wealth Management business could be restricted, which in turn could limit our ability to repay debt, redeem or purchase shares of our outstanding stock, or pay dividends, which could have a Material Adverse Effect. A large operating loss or charge against net capital could adversely affect our ability to expand or even maintain our present levels of business.
Our Wealth Management business offers products sponsored by third parties, including but not limited to mutual funds, insurance, annuities and alternative investments. These products are subject to complex regulations that change frequently. Although we have controls in place to facilitate compliance with such regulations, there can be no assurance that our interpretation of the regulations will be consistent with various regulators’ interpretations, that our procedures will be viewed as adequate by regulatory examiners, or that the operating subsidiaries will be deemed to be in compliance with regulatory requirements in all material respects. If products sold by our Wealth Management business do not perform as anticipated due to market factors or otherwise, or if product sponsors become insolvent or are otherwise unable to meet their obligations, this
could result in material litigation and regulatory action against us. In addition, we could face liabilities for actual or alleged breaches of legal duties to customers with respect to the suitability of the financial products we make available in our open architecture product platform or the investment advice of our financial advisors.
See “ Government regulation of our business, including increased regulation or the interpretation of existing laws, rules or regulations, could have a Material Adverse Effect" for additional information regarding the regulation of our business.
The transition of our Wealth Management business to a new clearing platform may negatively impact our operations and our advisors and the customers of our Wealth Management business.
Our Wealth Management business has entered into a new clearing services relationship with Fidelity Clearing & Custody Solutions (“FCCS”), which becomes effective in September 2018 (the “Target Date”). The transition of our clearing business to FCCS involves significant operational, technological, and logistical effort, since it will require all HD Vest brokerage business and customer accounts to migrate to FCCS’s clearing platform, together with all of the underlying customer data. Should we experience material delays or complications in this effort, it could have a Material Adverse Effect on our business. In addition, our advisors or customers could be dissatisfied by the process of transitioning to FCCS, or by the different technology, systems, processes, policies and products FCCS offers. Should a significant number of advisors or customers, or assets under administration leave as a result, it could have a Material Adverse Effect.
The movement of business to a new clearing firm is an extremely complex and intensive undertaking and we have committed a significant amount of human, technological, and financial resources to ensure that the transition is successfully completed by the target date. Given the complexity and magnitude of the transition effort, however, there can be no guarantee that we will not experience delays, unexpected costs, technological failures, incompatibility of systems or policies, or loss of employees, advisors and customers. In completing the transition, we are dependent on key employees as well as outside contractors. If those employees or contractors leave HD Vest or the project before completion, it could significantly delay the completion of the transition. Failure to complete the transition to FCCS by the Target Date for any reason could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
We may not succeedrealize the financial, operational, and customer-experience benefits that we project from our transition to FCCS’s clearing platform. The technology, service and product offerings presented by FCCS may not be accepted by our advisors or customers at the levels we anticipate, and may not provide the level of benefits that we expect even if accepted. We also may not realize the level of conversion of direct-to-fund assets onto FCCS’s clearing platform that we anticipate. Should the number of accounts or assets that convert to FCCS’s platform fall short of expectations, we will likely receive less economic benefit from the new clearing arrangement than we expected, which could be material. Likewise, should the Federal Reserve not increase interest rates at the pace or to the levels anticipated, we would likely recognize lower revenue from the cash-sweep program under the new clearing arrangement, potentially in a material amount.
Our Wealth Management business is dependent on the marketplace, resultingperformance, liquidity and continuity of its clearing firm. Should its clearing firm fail to provide clearing services at the contracted levels for any reason, or to suffer a liquidity event, it could result in lost market share, wasted development costs,a Material Adverse Effect.
Our operation systems and damagenetwork infrastructure is subject to our brands.
|
|
Our operation systemssignificant and constantly evolving cybersecurity and network infrastructure is subject to significant and constantly evolving cybersecurity or other technological risks, and the security measures that we have implemented to secure confidential and personal information may be breached; a potential breach may pose risks to the uninterrupted operation of our systems, expose us to mitigation costs, litigation, investigation, fines and penalties by authorities, claims by persons whose information was disclosed, and damage to our reputation. |
We collect and retain certain sensitive personal data. Our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management businesses collect, use, and retain large amounts of confidential personal and financial information from their customers, and clients, including
information regarding income, assets, family members, credit cards, tax returns, bank accounts, social security numbers, and healthcare. Maintaining the integrity of theseour systems and networks is critical to the success of our business operations, including the retention of our customers clients and advisors, and to the protection of our proprietary information and our customers' and clients’ personal information. A major breach of our systems or those of our third-party service providers may have materially negative consequences for our businesses, including possible fines, penalties and damages, reduced demand for our services, harm to our reputation and brands, further regulation and oversight by federal or state agencies, and loss of our ability to provide financial transaction services or accept and process customer credit card orders or tax returns. We may detect, or we may receive notices from customers or clients or public or private agencies that they have detected, vulnerabilities in our servers or our software, or third-party software components that are distributed with our products.software. The existence of vulnerabilities, even if they do not result in a security breach, may harm customer and client confidence and require substantial resources to address, and we may not be able to discover or remediate such security vulnerabilities before they are exploited.
We are subject to laws, regulations, and industry rules relating to the collection, use, and security of user data. We expect regulation in this area to increase. As a result of our current data protection policies and practices may not be sufficient and thus may require modification. New regulations may require notification to customers, clients, or employees of a security breach, restrict our use of personal information, and hinder our ability to acquire new, or market to, existing customers and clients. As our business continues to expand to new industry segments that may be more highly regulated for privacy and data security, our compliance requirements and costs may increase. We have incurred, and may continue to incur, significant expenses to comply with privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards, and contractual obligations.
In addition, hackers may develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that can be used to attack our offerings. Although we utilize network and application security measures, internal controls, and physical security procedures to safeguard our systems, there can be no assurance that a security breach, intrusion, or loss or theft of personal information will not occur. Any such incident may materially harm our business, reputation,could cause a Material Adverse Effect and future financial results and may require us to expend significant resources to address these problems, including notification under data privacy regulations. In addition, our employees (including temporary and seasonal employees) and contractors may have access to sensitive and personal information of our customers, clients, and employees. While we conduct background checks of our employees and these other individuals and limit access to systems and data, it is possible that one or more of these individuals may circumvent these controls, resulting in a security breach. In addition, we rely on third party vendors to host certain of our sensitive and personal information and data.data through cloud services. While we conduct due diligence on these third party partners with respect to their security and business controls, we may not have the ability to effectively monitor or oversee the implementation of these control measures, and, in any event, individuals or third parties may be able to circumvent and/or exploit vulnerabilities that may exist in these security and business controls, resulting in a loss of sensitive and personal customer client, or employee information and data.
Despite the measures we have taken and may in the future take to address and mitigate cybersecurity and technology risks, we cannot assure that our systems and networks will not be subject to breaches or interference. Any such event may result in operational disruptions as well as unauthorized access to or the disclosure or loss of our proprietary information or our customers’ and clients’ personal information, which in turn may result in legal claims, regulatory scrutiny and liability, reputational damage, the incurrence of costs to eliminate or mitigate further exposure, the loss of customers, clients, or advisors, or other damage to our business. While we maintain cyber liability insurance that provides both third-party liability and first-party liability coverages, this insurance is subject to exclusions and may not be sufficient to protect us against all losses. In addition, the trend toward broad consumer and general public notification of such incidents could exacerbate the harm to our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Even if we successfully protect our technology infrastructure and the confidentiality of sensitive data, we may incur significant expenses in connection with our responses to any such attacks as well as the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of appropriate security measures. We could also suffer harm to our business and reputation if attempted security breaches are publicized. We cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in our systems, data thefts, physical system or network break-ins, inappropriate access, or other developments will not compromise or breach the technology or other security measures protecting the networks and systems used in connection with our businesses.
|
|
Increased government regulation of our business may harm our operating results. |
We are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations that affect our activities, including, without limitation, areas of labor, advertising, tax, financial services, data privacy and security requirements, digital content, consumer protection, real estate, billing, promotions, quality of services, intellectual property ownership and infringement, anti-corruption, foreign exchange controls and cash repatriation restrictions, anti-competition, environmental, health, and safety. There have been significant new regulations and heightened focus by the government on many of these areas, as well as in areas such as insurance and healthcare (including, for example, the Affordable Care Act). As we complete our Strategic Transformation and
expand our products and services and revise our business models, we may become subject to additional government regulation or increased regulatory scrutiny. Regulators may adopt new laws or regulations or their interpretation of existing laws or regulations may differ from ours as well as the laws of other jurisdictions in which we operate. The Trump Administration has called for a board review of, and potentially significant changes to, U.S. fiscal and tax laws and regulations. These changes may include comprehensive tax reform as well as the rolling back or repeal of various financial regulations, including the DOL fiduciary rule and the Dodd-Frank Act. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new U.S. federal laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be issued, nor is the impact of such changes onStolen identity refund fraud could impede our Tax Preparation or Wealth Management businesses clear. It is possible that some policies adopted by the new administration will benefit uscustomers’ ability to timely and others will negatively affect us. Until we know what changes are enacted, we will not know whether in total we benefit from, or are negatively affected by, the changes.
These regulatory requirementssuccessfully file their tax returns and receive their tax refunds, and could impose significant limitations, require changes to our business, require notification to customers, clients, or employees of a security breach, restrict our use of personal information, or cause changes in customer purchasing behavior that may make our business more costly, less efficient, or impossible to conduct, and may require us to modify our current or future products or services, which may materially harm our future financial results.
The tax preparation industry continues to receive heightened attention from federal and state governments. New legislation, regulation, public policy considerations, changes in the cybersecurity environment, litigation by the government or private entities, or new interpretations of existing laws may result in greater oversightdiminish customers’ perceptions of the tax preparation industry, restrict the typessecurity and reliability of products and services that we can offer or the prices we can charge, or otherwise cause us to change the way we operate our Tax Preparation business or offer our tax preparation products and services. We may not be ableservices, resulting in negative publicity. Increased governmental regulation to respond quicklyattempt to such regulatory, legislativecombat that fraud could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
We and other developments,companies offering tax preparation services (especially those offering DDIY solutions) have seen a rise in instances of criminals utilizing stolen information obtained through hacking, phishing, and these changes mayother means of identity theft in turn increaseorder to electronically file fraudulent federal and state tax returns. As a result, impacted taxpayers must complete additional forms and go through additional steps in order to report to appropriate authorities that their identities have been stolen and their tax returns were filed fraudulently. Though we offer assistance in the refund recovery process, stolen identity refund fraud could impede our costcustomers’ ability to timely and successfully file their returns and receive their tax refunds, and could diminish customers’ perceptions of doing businessthe security and limitreliability of our revenue opportunities.tax preparation products and services, resulting in negative publicity, despite there having been no breach in the security of our systems. In addition, if our practices are not consistent with new interpretations of existing laws, we may become subject to lawsuits, penalties, and other liabilities that did not previously apply. We are also required to comply withstolen identity refund fraud is perpetrated at a variety of state revenue agency standards in order to successfully operatematerial level through our tax preparation products or services, state, federal, or foreign tax authorities may refuse to allow us to continue to process our customers’ tax returns electronically. As a result, stolen identity fraud could have a Material Adverse Effect on our Tax Preparation business.
Federal, state, and electronic filing services. Changes in state-imposed requirements by one or more of the states, including the required use of specific technologies or technology standards, may significantly increase the costs of providing those services to our customers and may prevent us from delivering a quality product to our customers in a timely manner and at an acceptable price.
Our Wealth Management business is subject to certain additional financial industry regulations and supervision, including by the SEC, FINRA, DOL, state securities and insurance regulators, and other regulatory authorities. Our failure to comply with the laws, rules, and regulations promulgated by federal regulatory bodies and the regulatoryforeign governmental authorities in each of the states and other jurisdictions in which we dooperate have taken action, and may take action in the future, in an attempt to combat stolen identity refund fraud, which may require changes to our systems and business practices in ways we cannot anticipate. These actions may have a Material Adverse Effect on our Tax Preparation business.
If we are unable to develop, manage, and maintain critical third party business relationships for our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management businesses, it could result in the restriction of the ongoing conduct or growth, or even liquidation of, parts of our business and otherwise materially impact our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity. These regulatory authorities continuously review legislative and regulatory initiatives and may adopt new or revised laws, regulations, or interpretations, and there can also be no assurance that other federal or state agencies will not attempt to further regulate our business. The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted into law in 2010, called for sweeping changes in the supervision and regulations of the wealth management industry. Regulators implementing the Dodd-Frank Act have adopted, proposed to adopt, and will in the future adopt regulations that may impact the manner in which we will market HD Vest products and services, manage HD Vest operations, and interact with regulators. As noted above, the Trump Administration has called for a broad review of, and potentially significant changes to, U.S. fiscal laws and regulations which may include the rolling back or even repeal of certain financial regulations, including but not limited to the Dodd-Frank Act. Until we know what changes are enacted, we will not know whether such changes will have a positive or negative impact on our business.
In April 2016, the DOL issued final regulations changing the definition of who is a fiduciary under ERISA and specifying how such fiduciaries must provide investment advice to Covered Accounts. Over the past several quarters, IRAs made up approximately half of HD Vest's assets under administration. The new DOL regulations focus on conflicts of interest related to investment recommendations made by financial advisors to clients holding Covered Accounts. The rules bring virtually all of the investment products and services HD Vest currently provides to IRA owners within the scope of ERISA. The rules, the applicability of which are phased in between April 10, 2017 and January 1, 2018, will require HD Vest to either: (1) subject such Covered Accounts to a level fee arrangement under which (a) the firm and affiliates receive a fee based on a fixed percentage of the value of assets in the account and (b) no ERISA prohibited transactions are otherwise implicated; or (2) comply with one of the DOL prohibited transaction exemptions that impose significant new and additional compliance and disclosure requirements, and restrict the manner in which HD Vest can earn revenue and pay its financial advisors. On February 3, 2017, President Trump issued a memorandum directing the Secretary of Labor to examine the DOL fiduciary rule, make certain determinations regarding the rule’s impact, and based on the outcome of that review potentially publish a proposed rule rescinding or revising the rule. Accordingly, it is uncertain whether the rule will become applicable, when it will be applicable, and what form any final regulation might take after the required review is completed. If the regulations are applied in their current form, they will impact how HD Vest designs investment products and services for Covered Accounts,
how we receive fees, and how we compensate our advisors. The regulations will impact how we are able to recruit and retain financial advisors and will require us to change systems and implement new compliance programs and client disclosures. In addition, if HD Vest relies on the new Best Interest Contract prohibited transaction exemption, the firm will be required to adopt new “impartial conduct” policies and procedures and make contractual representations and warranties to clients that HD Vest will comply with such policies and procedures and abide by fiduciary standards. These requirements, coupled with ambiguity inherent in the new rules, will likely lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and litigation related to the provision of investment advice to IRA and ERISA investors. HD Vest’s management team has devoted and, if the regulations are applied in their current form, expects to continue to devote substantial time and resources to assess the new rules, implement required policies and procedures, and develop and execute a business strategy in light of such rules, diminishing the firm’s ability to focus on other initiatives. Depending on the scope of required changes, if HD Vest is not able to complete necessary modifications to its business practices and operational systems by the applicability date, its ability to process business for Covered Accounts will be negatively impacted. As a result, the new DOL rules and related litigation and regulatory scrutiny could materially and adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, investigations, claims, or other actions or proceedings by regulators or third-parties with respect to our compliance with these new regulations may also have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and interpretations is largely dependent on our establishment and maintenance of compliance, audit, and reporting systems and procedures, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified compliance, audit, and risk management personnel. While we have adopted systems, policies, and procedures reasonably designed to comply or facilitate compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and interpretations, these systems, policies, and procedures may not be fully effective. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to investigations, claims, or other actions or proceedings by regulators or third-parties with respect to our past or future compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations, the outcome of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
HD Vest distributes its products and services through financial advisors who affiliate with the firm as independent contractors. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial, or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change, or at least challenge, the classification of our financial advisors as independent contractors. Although we believe we have properly classified our advisors as independent contractors, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other U.S. federal or state authorities or similar authorities may determine that we have misclassified our advisors as independent contractors for employment tax or other purposes and, as a result, seek additional taxes from us or attempt to impose fines and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business model, financial condition, and results of operations.
|
|
If we are unable to develop, manage, and maintain critical third party business relationships for our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management businesses, those businesses may be materially and adversely affected. |
Material Adverse Effect.Our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management businesses are dependent on the strength of our business relationships and our ability to continue to develop, maintain, and leverage new and existing relationships. We rely on various third party partners, including software and service providers, suppliers, vendors, distributors, contractors, financial institutions, and licensing partners, among others, in many areas of these businesses to deliver our services and products. In certain instances, the products or services provided through these third party relationships may be difficult to replace or substitute, depending on the level of integration of the third party’s products or services into, or with, our offerings and/or the general availability of such third party’s products and services. In addition, there may be few or no alternative third party providers or vendors in the market. The failure of third parties to provide acceptable and high quality products, services, and technologies or to update their products, services, and technologies may result in a disruption to our business operations, which may materially reduce our
revenues and profits, cause us to lose customers and clients,customers, and damage our reputation. Alternative arrangements and services may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or we may experience business interruptions upon a transition to an alternative partner.
Our Wealth Management business does not offer any proprietary financial products. Instead, it distributes certain investment and insurance products through distribution agreements with third-party financial institutions, including banks, mutual funds, and insurance companies. These products are sold by our financial advisors, who are independent contractors. Maintaining and deepening relationships with these unaffiliated distributors and financial advisors is an important part of our growth strategy because strong third-party distribution arrangements enhance our ability to market our products and increase our assets under management, revenues, and profitability. There can be no assurance that the distribution and financial advisor relationships we have established will continue. Our distribution partners and financial advisors may cease to operate, consolidate, institute cost-cutting efforts, or otherwise terminate their relationship with us. Any such reduction in access to third-party distributors and financial advisors may have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products and to generate revenue in our Wealth Management segment.
In addition, there are risks associated with our third-party clearing firm that we rely on to provide clearing services for our Wealth Management business that are discussed above.
Access to investment and insurance product distribution channels is subject to intense competition due to the large number of competitors and products in the broker-dealer, investment advisory and insurance industries. Relationships with distributors are subject to periodic negotiation that may result in increased distribution costs and/or reductions in the amount of revenue we realize based on sales of particular products or clientcustomer assets. In addition, regulatory changes (such as the Fiduciary Rule) may negatively impact our revenues and profits related to particular products or services. Any increase in the costs to distribute our products or reduction in the type or amount of products made available for sale, or revenue associated with those products, may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
|
|
The Tax Preparation and Wealth Management markets are very competitive, and failure to effectively compete will materially and adversely affect our financial results. |
Our Tax Preparation business operates in a very competitive marketplace. There are many competing software products and online services. Intuit’s TurboTax and H&R Block’s products and services have a significant percentage of the software and online service market. Our Tax Preparation business must also compete with alternate methods of tax preparation, including "pencil and paper" do-it-yourself return preparation by individual filers and storefront tax preparation services, including both local tax preparers and large chains such as H&R Block, Liberty, and Jackson Hewitt. Finally, our Tax Preparation business faces the risk that state or federal taxing agencies will offer software or systems to provide direct access for individual filers that will reduce the need for TaxAct’s software and services. As digital do-it-yourself tax preparation continues to be characterized by intense competition, including heavy marketing expenditures, price-based competition, and new entrants, maintaining and growing share becomes more challenging unless brand relevance, customer experience, and feature/functionality provide meaningful incremental value. Our financial results may materially suffer if we cannot continue to offer software and services that have quality and ease-of-use that are compelling to consumers; market the software and services in a cost-effective manner; offer ancillary services that are attractive to users; and develop the software and services at a low enough cost to be able to offer them at a competitive price point.
The wealth management industry in which HD Vest operates is highly competitive, and we may not be able to maintain our clients, financial advisors, distribution network, or the terms on which we provide our products and services. HD Vest competes based on a number of factors, including name recognition, service, the quality of investment advice, investment performance, technology, product offerings and features, price, and perceived financial strength. Competitors in the wealth management industry include broker-dealers, banks, asset managers, insurers, and other financial institutions. Many of these competitors have greater market share, offer a broader range of products and have greater financial resources. In addition, over time certain sectors of the wealth management industry have become considerably more concentrated, as financial institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. This consolidation could result in our competitors gaining greater resources, and we may experience pressures on our pricing and market share as a result of these factors and as some of our competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.
|
|
Our website and transaction management software, data center systems, or the systems of third-party co-location facilities and cloud service providers could fail or become unavailable or otherwise be inadequate, which could materially harm our reputation and result in a material loss of revenues and current or potential customers and clients. |
Any system interruptions that result in the unavailability or unreliability of our websites, transaction processing systems, or network infrastructure could materially reduce our revenue and impair our ability to properly process transactions. We use both internally developed and third-party systems, including cloud computing and storage systems, for our online services and certain aspects of transaction processing. Some of our systems are relatively new and untested and thus may be subject to failure or unreliability. Any system unavailability or unreliability may cause unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times, degradation in customer satisfaction, additional expense, or delays in reporting accurate financial information.
Our data centers and cloud service could be susceptible to damage or disruption, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and financial results. Our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management businesses have disaster recovery centers but if their primary data centers fail and those disaster recovery centers do not fully restore the failed environments, our business will suffer. In particular, if such interruption occurs during the tax season, the revenueMaterial Adverse Effect.
The seasonality of our Tax Preparation business would be materiallyrequires a precise development and adversely impacted.
Our systemsrelease schedule and operations,any delays or issues with accuracy or quality may damage our reputation and those of our third-party service providers, could be damaged or interrupted by fire, flood, earthquakes, other natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failure, internet breakdown, break-in, human error, software bugs, hardware failures, malicious attacks, computer viruses, computer denial of service attacks, terrorist attacks, or other events beyond our control. Such damage or interruption may affect internal and external systems that we rely upon to provide our services, take and fulfill customer orders, handle customer service requests, and host other products and services.
During the period in which services are unavailable, we will be unable or severely limited in our ability to generate revenues, and we may also be exposed to liability from those third parties to whom we provide services. We could face significant losses as a result of these events, and our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all potential losses.
|
|
A drop in our investment performance could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability. |
Investment performance is a key competitive factor for our Wealth Management segment. Strong investment performance helps to increase client retention and generate sales of products and services. There can be no assurance as to how future investment performance will compare to our competitors, and historical performance is not indicative of future returns. Any drop or perceived drop in investment performance, on an absolute or relative basis, could cause a decline in sales of mutual funds and other investment products, an increase in redemptions and the termination of asset management relationships. These impacts may reduce our aggregate amount of assets under management and reduce management fees. Poor investment performance could also adversely affect our ability to expand the distribution of our products through independent financial advisors.
|
|
Restrictions on, changes to, or litigation regarding financial products may materially harm our financial results. |
In our Tax Preparation business, we generate revenue from certain financial products related to our tax preparation software and services. These products include prepaid debit cards on which a tax filer may receive his or her tax refund and the ability of certain of our users to have the fees for our services deducted from their tax refund. Any regulation of these products by state or federal governments, or any competing products offered by state and federal tax collection agencies, could materially and adversely impact our revenue from these financial products. In addition, litigation brought by consumers or state or federal agencies relating to these products may result in additional restrictions on the offering of these products. To the extent that any such additional restrictions or legal claims restrict our ability to offer such products, our financial results may materially suffer.
Our Wealth Management business offers products sponsored by third parties, including but not limited mutual funds, insurance, annuities and alternative investments. These products are subject to complex regulations that change frequently. Although HD Vest has controls in place to facilitate compliance with such regulations, there can be no assurance that its interpretation of the regulations will be consistent with various regulators’ interpretations, that its procedures will be viewed as adequate by regulatory examiners, or that the operating subsidiaries will be deemed to be in compliance with regulatory requirements in all material respects. If products sold by the firm were not to perform as anticipated due to market factors or otherwise, or if the product sponsor became insolvent or is otherwise unable to meet its obligations, this would likely result in material litigation and regulatory action against HD Vest relating to its sales of those products.
In response to the DOL rules, product manufacturers have started to revise the pricing and compensation structures associated with mutual funds, annuities, and alternative products offered by HD Vest. With respect to mutual funds, the broad implementation of additional fund share classes, or broad adoption of so-called “clean” shares which would be sold at net asset value without any 12b-1 payments or servicing fees, could result in additional competitive pressures, fee compression, and materially reduced compensation for HD Vest in connection with offering these products to investment clients. These product changes may be implemented by fund companies and other product manufacturers regardless of whether the DOL fiduciary rule is revised or rescinded.
Registered investment advisors have fiduciary obligations that require us and our advisors to act in the best interests of our clients and to disclose any material conflicts of interest. We may face liabilities for actual or alleged breaches of legal duties to clients with respect to the suitability of the financial products we make available in our open architecture product platform or the investment advice of our financial advisors.
|
|
Unanticipated changes in income tax rates, deduction types, or taxation structure may materially and adversely affect our Tax Preparation business. |
Changes in the way that state and federal governments structure their taxation regimes may materially and adversely affect our financial results. The introduction of a simplified or flattened taxation structure may make our services less necessary or attractive to individual filers. We also face risk from the possibility of increased complexity in taxation structures, which may encourage some of our customers to seek professional tax advice instead of using our software or services. In the event that such changes to tax structures cause us to lose market share, our results may materially suffer.
|
|
If our Tax Preparation business fails to process transactions effectively or fails to adequately protect against disputed or potential fraudulent activities, our revenue and earnings may be materially harmed. |
Our Tax Preparation business processes a significant volume and dollar value of transactions on a daily basis, particularly during tax season. Due to the size and volume of transactions that we handle, effective processing systems and controls are essential to ensure that transactions are handled appropriately. Despite our efforts, it is possible that we may make errors or that fraudulent activity may affect our services. In addition to any direct damages and fines that may result from any such problems, which may be substantial, a loss of confidence in our controls may materially harm our business and damage our brand. The systems supporting our Tax Preparation business are comprised of multiple technology platforms, some of which are difficult to scale. If we are unable to effectively manage our systems and processes, we may be unable to process customer data in an accurate, reliable, and timely manner, which may materially harm our business.
|
|
The seasonality of our Tax Preparation business requires a precise development and release schedule and any delays or issues with accuracy or quality may damage our reputation and materially harm our future financial results. |
Material Adverse Effect.Our tax preparation software and online service must be ready to launch in final form near the beginning of each calendar year to take advantage of the full tax season. We must update the code for our software and service on a precise schedule each year to account for annual changes in tax laws and regulations and ensure that the software and service are accurate. Delayed and unpredictable changes to federal and state tax laws and regulations can cause an already tight development cycle to become even more challenging. If we are unable to meet this precise schedule and we launch our software and service late, we risk losing customers to our competitors. If we cannot develop our software with a high degree of accuracy and quality, we risk errors in the tax returns that are generated. Such errors could result in loss of reputation, lower customer retention, or legal claims, fees, and payouts related to the warranty on our software and service.service, which could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
The specialized and highly seasonal nature of our Tax Preparation business presents financial risks and operational challenges, which, if not satisfactorily addressed, could result in a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
Risk management policies and procedures for our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management business may not be fully effective in identifying or mitigating risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, including employee and financial advisor misconduct. |
WeOur Tax Preparation business is highly seasonal, with a significant portion of our annual revenue for such services earned in the first four months of our fiscal year. The concentration of our revenue-generating activity during this relatively short period presents a number of challenges for us, including cash and resource management during the last eight months of our fiscal year, when our Tax Preparation business generally operates at a loss and incurs fixed costs of preparing for the upcoming tax season, responding to changes in competitive conditions, including marketing, pricing, and new product offerings, which could affect our position during the tax season, and ensuring optimal uninterrupted operations and service delivery during the tax season. If we experience significant business disruptions during the tax season or if we are subjectunable to satisfactorily address the challenges described above and related challenges associated with a seasonal business, it could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
If our Tax Preparation business fails to process transactions effectively or fails to adequately protect against disputed or potential fraudulent activities, it could have a Material Adverse Effect.
Our Tax Preparation business processes a significant volume and dollar value of transactions on a daily basis, particularly during tax season. Due to the riskssize and volume of errors and misconduct by our employees and financial advisors, such as fraud, non-compliance with policies, recommending transactions that we handle, effective processing systems and controls are not suitable,essential to ensure that transactions are handled appropriately. Despite our efforts, it is possible that we may make errors or that fraudulent activity may affect our services. In addition to any direct damages and improperly using or disclosing confidential information. Although we have internalfines that may result from any such problems, which may be substantial, a loss of confidence in our controls in place, these issuesmay materially harm our business and damage our brand. The systems supporting our Tax Preparation business are comprised of multiple technology platforms, some of which are difficult to detectscale. If we are unable to effectively manage our systems and processes, we may be unable to process customer data in advancean accurate, reliable, and deter,timely manner, which could result in a Material Adverse Effect.
Our website and transaction management software, data center systems, or the systems of third-party co-location facilities and cloud service providers could fail or become unavailable or otherwise be inadequate, which could materially harm our business, resultsreputation and result in a material loss of operationsrevenues and current or financial condition.potential customers and customers and have a Material Adverse Effect.
Any system interruptions that result in the unavailability or unreliability of our websites, transaction processing systems, or network infrastructure could materially reduce our revenue and impair our ability to properly process transactions. We use both internally developed and third-party systems, including cloud computing and storage systems, for our online services and certain aspects of transaction processing. Some of our systems are furtherrelatively new and untested and thus may be subject to failure or unreliability. Any system unavailability or unreliability may cause unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times, degradation in customer satisfaction, additional expense, or delays in reporting accurate financial information. For example, we have been migrating data to the riskcloud. This migration has been costly and has diverted some of nonperformancemanagement’s attention and resources in order to ensure a smooth transition to the cloud.
Our data centers and cloud service could be susceptible to damage or inadequate performancedisruption, which could have a Material Adverse Effect. Our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management businesses have business continuity plans that include secondary disaster recovery centers, but if their primary data centers fail and those disaster recovery centers do not fully restore the failed environments, our business will suffer. In particular, if such interruption occurs during the tax season, it could have a Material Adverse Effect on our Tax Preparation business.
Our systems and operations, and those of contractual obligationsour third-party service providers and partners, could be damaged or interrupted by third-party vendorsfire, flood, earthquakes, other natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failure, internet breakdown, break-in, human error, software bugs, hardware failures, malicious attacks, computer viruses, computer denial of service attacks, terrorist attacks, or other events beyond our control. Such damage or interruption may affect internal and external systems that we rely upon to provide our services, take and fulfill customer orders, handle customer service requests, and host other products and services. During the period in which services that are usedunavailable, we will be unable or severely limited in our businesses. Managementability to generate revenues, and we may also be exposed to liability from those third parties to whom we provide services. We could face significant losses as a result of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a large number of transactions andthese events, and these policies and proceduresour business interruption insurance may not be fully effectiveadequate to compensate us for all potential losses, which could result in mitigatinga Material Adverse Effect.
Current and future litigation or regulatory proceedings or adverse court interpretations of the laws under which the Company operates could have a Material Adverse Effect.
Many aspects of our risk exposurebusiness involve substantial risks of liability. We are currently subject to lawsuits and are likely to be subject to litigation in all market environmentsthe future. In highly volatile markets, the volume of claims and amount of damages sought in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions have historically increased. Any lawsuits to which we are subject, such as purported class actions, shareholder derivative lawsuits or against all typesclaims by wealth management customers, could result in substantial expenditures, generate adverse publicity and could significantly impair our business, or force us to cease offering certain products or services. Defense of risk. Insuranceany lawsuit, even if successful, could require substantial time and attention of our management and could require the expenditure of significant amounts for legal fees and other traditional risk-shifting toolsrelated costs. In addition, litigation or regulatory proceedings or actions brought by state or federal agencies relating to our products or services may be held byresult in additional restrictions on the offering of certain of our products or availableservices. To the extent that any such additional restrictions or legal claims restrict our ability to usoffer such products or services, it could result in order to manage certain exposures, but they are subject to terms such as deductibles, coinsurance, limits and policy exclusions, as well as the risk of counterparty denial of coverage, default or insolvency.a Material Adverse Effect.
|
|
| If we are unable to hire, retain, and motivate highly qualified employees, including our key employees, we may not be able to successfully manage our businesses. |
Our future success depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, retain, and motivate highly skilled management, technical, sales and marketing, and corporate development personnel, including personnel with experience and expertise in the wealth management, tax preparation, and technology industries to support our new strategic focus. Qualified personnel with experience relevant to our businesses are scarce, and competition to recruit them is intense. If we fail to successfully hire and retain a sufficient number of highly qualified employees, we may have difficulties in supporting or expanding our businesses. Realignments of resources, reductions in workforce, or other operational decisions have created and could continue to create an unstable work environment and may have a negative effect on our ability to hire, retain, and motivate employees.
Our business and operations are substantially dependent on the performance of our key employees. Changes of management or key employees may disrupt operations, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial results or delay achievement of our business objectives. In addition, if we lose the services of one or more key employees and are unable to recruit and retain a suitable successor with relevant experience, we may not be able to successfully and timely manage our business or achieve our business objectives. There can be no assurance that any retention program we initiate will be successful at retaining employees, including key employees. As part of the relocation of our corporate headquarters to Irving, Texas, we expect to replace nearly all of our corporate employees, with the exception of our Chief Executive Officer and certain positions that will
be eliminated as part of our restructure. We will engage in a search process to identify, evaluate and select new employees for each position moving to Texas, but there can be no assurance that we will fill every position in a timely manner or at all. In addition, while we have put an enhanced retention program in place to ensure the orderly transition of our key employees, there can be no assurance that the retention program will be successful at retaining our key employees through the move date. The loss of key employees before a suitable replacement is in place may disrupt operations, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial results. In addition, we recently announced leadership transitions at our Tax Preparation and Wealth Management segments. The uncertainty inherent in leadership transitions can be difficult to manage, may cause concerns from third parties with whom we do business, and may increase the likelihood of turnover of other key officers, employees and, in the case of our Wealth Management segment, turnover of advisors. If we are not effective in managing these leadership transitions, our business could be adversely impacted and our operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
We use stock options, restricted stock units, and other equity-based awards to recruit and retain senior level employees. With respect to those employees to whom we issue such equity-based awards, we face a significant challenge in retaining them if the value of equity-based awards in aggregate or individually is either not deemed by the employee to be substantial enough or deemed so substantial that the employee leaves after their equity-based awards vest. If our stock price does not increase significantly above the exercise prices of our options, we may need to issue new equity-based awards in order to motivate and retain our key employees. We may undertake or seek stockholder approval to undertake other equity-based programs to retain our employees, which may be viewed as dilutive to our stockholders or may increase our compensation costs. There can be no assurance that any such programs, if approved by stockholders, or any other incentive programs, would be successful in motivating and retaining our employees.
We may be negatively impacted by the recently passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or by any future changes in tax laws. |
|
Restructuring and streamlining our business, and relocating our headquarters, including implementing reductions in workforce, discretionary spending, and other expense reductions, may materially harm our businesses. |
We haveOn December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into law. The change in the past found and may in the future find it advisable to take measures to streamline operations and reduce expenses, including, without limitation, reducing our workforce or discontinuing products or businesses. For example, in connection with our Strategic Transformation (as described in the "Strategic Transformation" section in Part II Item 7 of this annual report), we have effected and will in the future effect significant reductions-in-force. In addition, on October 27, 2016, we announced that wetax law will be relocatingeffective for our headquarters2018 calendar year financial reporting period. The primary impacts to the State of Texas during 2017. As partus include a reduction of the relocation, we expectfederal corporate tax rate from 35% to replace nearly all21% affecting our net deferred tax liabilities, repeal of our corporate employees, with the exceptionalternative minimum tax and associated potential refunds of our Chief Executive Officerprior paid taxes, and potential deductible limits of certain positions that will be eliminated as part of our restructure. Such measures may place significant strains on our management and employees. We have incurred and may continue to incur liabilities from these measures, including liabilities from retention bonuses, enhanced severance payments, early termination or assignment of contracts, potential failure to meet obligations due to loss of employees or resources, and resulting litigation. Such effects from restructuring, streamlining and relocatingexecutive compensation. These changes could have a materially negativematerial impact to the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities and the Company’s future taxable income and effective tax rate.The Company is continuing to analyze the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Until such analysis is complete, the full impact of the new tax law on the Company in future periods is uncertain.
In addition, changes in tax laws, whether federal or state tax laws, require updates to our tax preparation software used in our Tax Preparation business. Such updates are costly and may be time consuming to ensure that they accurately reflect the new laws that are adopted. It is difficult to know at this time how our customers will view the new federal tax laws that were enacted in late 2017. Possible outcomes include a short-term or long-term increase in customers that prefer professional tax advice and preparation services rather than using our software or we may see a change in our how customers value our software services as customers may perceive their tax preparation has become simpler as a result of the new tax laws, which could result in lower demand for our products and could reduce revenue and/or the number of units sold. Further changes in the way that state and federal governments structure their taxation regimes could also cause a Material Adverse Effect on our business, financial condition,Tax Preparation Business. The introduction of a simplified or flattened federal or state taxation structure may make our services less necessary or attractive to individual filers, which could reduce revenue and the number of units sold. We also face risk from the possibility of increased complexity in taxation structures, which may encourage some of our customers to seek professional tax advice instead of using our software or services. In the event that such changes to tax structures cause us to lose market share or cause a decline in customers, it could cause a Material Adverse Effect.
Our risk management and conflicts of interest policies and procedures may be ineffective or leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks.
We are subject to the risks of errors and misconduct by our employees and financial results.advisors, such as fraud, non-compliance with policies, recommending transactions that are not suitable, and improperly using or disclosing confidential information. Although we have internal controls and other risk-mitigating factors in place, this type of conduct is difficult to detect and deter, and could materially harm our business, results of operations or financial condition. We are further subject to the risk of nonperformance or inadequate performance of contractual obligations by third-party vendors of products and services that are used in our businesses. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. Insurance and other traditional risk-shifting tools may be held by or available to us in order to manage certain exposures, but they are subject to terms such as deductibles, coinsurance, limits and policy exclusions, as well as the risk of counterparty denial of coverage, default or insolvency.
In our Wealth Management business, prevention and detection of wrongdoing or fraud by our advisors, who are not our employees and tend to be located remotely from our headquarters, present unique challenges. There cannot be any assurance that misconduct by our advisors will not lead to a Material Adverse Effect on our business. |
|
| RIAs have fiduciary obligations that require us and our advisors to act in the best interests of our customers and to disclose any material conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest are under growing scrutiny by U.S. federal and state regulators. Our risk management processes include addressing potential conflicts of interest that arise in our business. Management of potential conflicts of interest has become increasingly complex. A perceived or actual failure to address conflicts of interest adequately could affect our reputation, the willingness of customers to transact business with us or give rise to litigation or regulatory actions, any of which could have a Material Adverse Effect.
Our business depends on our strong reputation and the value of our brands, which could be negatively impacted by poor performance. |
Developing and maintaining awareness of our brands is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and future products and services and is an important element in attracting new customers and clients.customers. Adverse publicity (whether or not justified) relating to regulatory proceedings or other events or activities attributed to our businesses, our employees, our vendors, or our partners may tarnish our reputation and reduce the value of our brands. In addition, if we are unable to successfully integrate HD Vest or if we are unable to develop awareness of the HD Vest brand, our reputation could be damaged. Damage to our reputation and loss of brand equity may reduce demand for our products and services and have a material adverse effect on our future financial results. Such damage also would require additional resources to rebuild our reputation and restore the value of the brands.
|
|
| If others claim that our services infringe their intellectual property rights, we may be forced to seek expensive licenses, reengineer our services, engage in expensive and time-consuming litigation, or stop marketing and licensing our services. |
Companies and individuals with rights relating to the technology industry have frequently resorted to litigation regarding intellectual property rights. These parties have in the past made and may in the future make claims against us alleging infringement of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, or other intellectual property or proprietary rights, or alleging unfair competition or violations of privacy or publicity rights. Responding to any such claims could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention, cause product or service release delays, or require removal or redesigning of our products or services, payment of damages for infringement, or entry into royalty or licensing agreements. Our technology,
services, and products may not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use. In some cases, the ownership or scope of an entity’s or person’s rights is unclear. In addition, the ownership or scope of such rights may be altered by changes in the legal landscape, such as through developments in U.S. or international intellectual property laws or regulations or through court, agency, or regulatory board decisions. If a successful claim of infringement were made against us and we could not develop non-infringing technology or content, or license the infringed or similar technology or content, on a timely and cost-effective basis, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We do not regularly conduct patent searches to determine whether the technology used in our products or services infringes patents held by third parties. Patent searches may not return every issued patent or patent application that may be deemed relevant to a particular product or service. It is therefore difficult to determine, with any level of certainty, whether a particular product or service may be construed as infringing a current or future U.S. or foreign patent.
|
|
| We rely heavily on our technology and intellectual property, but we may be unable to adequately or cost-effectively protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, thereby weakening our competitive position and negatively impacting our business and financial results. We may have to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, which can be time consuming, expensive, and difficult to predict. |
To protect our rights in our services and technology, we rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements with employees and third parties, and protective contractual provisions. We also rely on laws pertaining to trademarks and domain names to protect the value of our corporate brands and reputation. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may copy aspects of our services or technology, obtain and use information, marks, or technology that we regard as proprietary, or otherwise violate or infringe our intellectual property rights. In addition, it is possible that others could independently develop substantially equivalent intellectual property. If we do not effectively protect our intellectual property, or if others independently develop substantially equivalent intellectual property, our competitive position could be materially weakened.
Effectively policing the unauthorized use of our services and technology is time-consuming and costly, and the steps taken by us may not prevent misappropriation of our technology or other proprietary assets. The efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective, and unauthorized parties may copy aspects of our services, use similar marks or domain names, or obtain and use information, marks, or technology that we regard as proprietary. In some cases, the ownership or scope of an entity’s or person’s rights is unclear and may also change over time, including through changes in U.S. or international intellectual property laws or regulations or through court, agency, or regulatory board decisions.
We may have to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of others’ proprietary rights, which are sometimes not clear or may change. Litigation can be time-consuming and expensive, and the outcome can be difficult to predict.
We may seek to acquire companies or assets that complement our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, and if we are unsuccessful in completing any such acquisitions on favorable terms or integrating any company acquired it could result in a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
We may seek to acquire companies or assets that complement our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, and our financial and operating results may materially suffer if we are unsuccessful in completing any such acquisitions on favorable terms. |
We may seek to acquire companies or assets that complement our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses. There can be no guarantee that any of the opportunities that we evaluate will result in the purchase by us of any business or asset being evaluated, or that, if acquired, we will be able to successfully integrate such acquisition.
If we are successful in our pursuit of any complementary acquisition opportunities, we intend to use available cash, debt and/or equity financing, and/or other capital or ownership structures designed to diversify our capital sources and attract a competitive cost of capital, all of which may change our leverage profile. There are a number of factors that impact our ability to succeed in acquiring the companies and assets we identify, including competition for these companies and assets, sometimes from larger or better-funded competitors. As a result, our success in completing acquisitions is not guaranteed. Our expectation is that, to the extent we are successful, any acquisitions will be additive to our businesses, taking into account potential benefits of operational synergies. However, these new business additions and acquisitions, if any, involve a number of risks and may not achieve our expectations, and, therefore, we could be materially and adversely affected by any such new business additions or acquisitions. There can be no assurance that the short or long-term value of any business or technology that we develop or acquire will be equal to the value of the cash and other consideration that we pay or expenses we incur.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
RISKS RELATEDTOOUR FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
We incurred debt in connection with our acquisition of HD Vest and may incur future debt related to other complementary acquisitions, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results. |
In connection with the repayment of our credit facility used for the acquisition of HD Vest TaxAct and HD Vest incurredthe redemption of our convertible senior notes and may incur future debt, under a December 2015 credit facility, of which $260.0 million was outstanding asmay materially and adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results.
As of December 31, 2016.2017, we had $345.0 million of outstanding indebtedness in the form of a term loan under a Credit Agreement to which we, and most of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (in their capacity as guarantors), are parties. The TaxAct-HD Vestfinal maturity date of the term loan is May 22, 2024. The proceeds of the term loan were used to repay in full the credit facility is a non-recourse debt and guaranteed by TaxAct Holdings, Inc. andused for the acquisition of HD Vest Holdings, Inc., alland to redeem in full our convertible senior notes. We may also borrow an additional amount under this Credit Agreement of which are Blucora’s direct subsidiaries. These debtsup to $50.0 million under a revolving credit arrangement.
This borrowing may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results by, among other things:
increasing TaxAct’s or HD Vest'sour vulnerability to downturns in theirour businesses, to competitive pressures, and to adverse economic and industry conditions;
requiring the dedication of a portion of our expected cash from TaxAct’s and HD Vest's operations to service the indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of expected cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures and complementary acquisitions;
requiring cash infusions from Blucora to TaxAct or HD Vest if any or all are unable to meet their payment or other obligations under the applicable credit facilities;
increasing our interest payment obligations in the event that interest rates rise dramatically;rise; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses and our industries.
These credit facilities impose
Our Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on TaxAct and HD Vest,us, including restrictions on theirour ability to create liens, on their assets and on our ability to incur indebtedness and require TaxAct and HD Vest to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Their ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond their control.make investments. In addition, these credit facilities includeour Credit Agreement includes covenants, the breach of which may cause the outstanding indebtedness to be declared immediately due and payable. These debts,This borrowing, and our ability to repay them,it, may also negatively impact our ability to obtain additional financing in the future and may affect the terms of any such financing.
In addition, we or our subsidiaries, may incur additional debt in the future to finance complementary acquisitions or for other purposes.future. Any additional debt may result in risks similar to those discussed above related to the TaxAct-HD Vest debt or in other risks specific to the credit agreements entered into for those debts.
|
|
We sold $201.25 million of Convertible Senior Notes in 2013, which may impact our financial results, result in the dilution of existing stockholders, and restrict our ability to take advantage of future opportunities. |
In March 2013, we sold $201.25 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due 2019. As of December 31, 2016, $172.9 million was outstanding. The accounting for the Notes results in the recognition of interest expense significantly more than the stated interest rate of the Notes and may result in volatility to our financial results. The Notes may be settled in a combination of cash or shares of common stock, indicating that the Notes contain liability and equity components. Upon issuance of the Notes, we were required to establish a separate initial value for the conversion option, the equity component, and bifurcate this value from the value attributable to the debt component of the Notes. As a result, for accounting purposes, we were required to treat the Notes as having been issued with a debt discount to their principal amount. We are accreting the debt discount to interest expense ratably over the term of the Notes, which amounts to an effective interest rate in our financial results that exceeds the stated interest rate of the Notes. This will reduce our earnings and could adversely affect the price at which our common stock trades but will have no effect on the amount of cash interest paid to holders or on our cash flows.
Our intent is to settle conversions of the Notes with cash for the principal amount of the debt and shares of common stock for any related conversion premium. Shares associated with the conversion premium will be included in diluted earnings per share when the average stock price exceeds the conversion price of the Notes and could adversely affect our diluted earnings per share and the price at which our common stock trades.
The conditional conversion feature of the Notes, if triggered, and the requirement to repurchase the Notes upon a fundamental change, may adversely affect our financial condition and financial results. In the event the conditional conversion feature of the Notes is triggered, holders of the Notes will be entitled, at their option, to convert the Notes at any time during specified periods. If we undergo a fundamental change (as described in the applicable Indenture), subject to certain conditions,
holders of the Notes may require us to repurchase all or part of their Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The payment of the interest and the repayment of principal at maturity, conversion, or under a fundamental change will require the use of a substantial amount of our cash. If such cash is not available, we may be required to sell other assets or enter into alternate financing arrangements at terms that may or may not be desirable. The existence of the Notes and the obligations we incurred by issuing them may hinder our ability to take advantage of certain future opportunities, such as engaging in future debt or equity financing activities, which may in turn reduce or impair our ability to acquire new businesses or invest in our existing businesses.
|
|
Existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operations may not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for servicing debt, working capital, and capital expenditures. |
Although we believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for servicing debt, working capital, and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months, the underlying levels of revenues and expenses that we project may not prove to be accurate. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had $172.9$345.0 million outstanding under the Notes, and HD Vest and TaxAct had $260.0 million outstanding under the credit facilityour term loan that was entered into in December 2015.May 2017. Servicing these debtsthis debt will require the dedication of a portion of our expected cash flow from operations, thereby reducing the amount of our cash flow available for other purposes. In addition, our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on, or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive, and other factors beyond our control. Our businesses may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial
condition and results at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.
In addition, we may evaluate complementary acquisitions of businesses, products, or technologies from time to time. Any such transactions, if completed, may use a significant portion of our cash balances and marketable investments. If we are unable to liquidate our investments when we need liquidity for complementary acquisitions or for other business purposes, we may need to change or postpone such acquisitions or find alternative financing for them. We may seek additional funding through public or private financings, through sales of equity, or through other arrangements. Our ability to raise funds may be materially and adversely affected by a number of factors, including factors beyond our control, such as economic conditions in the markets in which we operate and increased uncertainty in the financial, capital, and credit markets. Adequate funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on favorable terms. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to existing stockholders may result. If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, we may be unable, or delayed in our ability, to develop or enhance our products or services, take advantage of business opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could materially harm our business.
OTHER RISKSOTHER RISKS
|
|
| Our stock price has been highly volatile and such volatility may continue. |
The trading price of our common stock has been highly volatile, and such volatility does not always correspond to fluctuations in the market. Between January 1, 20152016 and December 31, 2016,2017, our closing stock price ranged from $4.76 to $16.60.$25.90. On February 21, 2017,2018, the closing price of our common stock was $15.80.$24.50. Our stock price could decline or fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, including the other risks discussed in this report and the following:
actual or anticipated variations in quarterly and annual results of operations;
impairment charges, changes in or loss of material contracts and relationships, dispositions or announcements of complementary acquisitions, or other business developments by us, our partners, or our competitors;
| |
��� | conditions or trends in the tax preparation or wealth management markets: |
conditions or trends in the tax preparation or wealth management markets or changes in market share;
changes in general conditions in the U.S.United States and global economies or financial markets;
announcements of technological innovations or new services by us or our competitors;
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
disclosures of any accounting issues, such as restatements or material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting;
equity issuances resulting in the dilution of stockholders;
the adoption of new regulations or accounting standards;
adverse publicity (whether justified or not) with respect to our business; and
announcements or publicity relating to litigation or governmental enforcement actions.
In addition, the equities market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, and our stock has been particularly susceptible to such fluctuations. Often, class action litigation has been instituted against companies after periods of volatility in the price of such companies’ stock. We have been defendants in such class action litigation in prior periods and could be subject to future litigation, potentially resulting in substantial cost and diversion of management’s attention and resources.
|
|
| Our financial results may fluctuate, which could cause our stock price to be volatile or decline. |
Our financial results have varied on a quarterly basis and are likely to continue to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations could cause our stock price to be volatile or decline. Many factors could cause our quarterly results to fluctuate materially, including but not limited to:
the inability of any of our businesses to meet our expectations;
the seasonality of our Tax Preparation business and the resulting large quarterly fluctuations in our revenues;
the success or failure of our Strategic Transformation and our ability to implement those initiatives in a cost effective manner;
variable demand for our services, rapidly evolving technologies and markets, and consumer preferences;
the level and mix of assets we have under management and administration, which are subject to fluctuation based on market conditions and customer activity;
the mix of revenues generated by existing businesses, discontinued operations or other businesses that we develop or acquire;
gains or losses driven by fair value accounting;
litigation expenses and settlement costs;
misconduct by employees and/or HD Vest financial advisors, which is difficult to detect and deter;
expenses incurred in finding, evaluating, negotiating, consummating, and integrating acquisitions;
impairment or negative performance of the many different industries and counterparties we rely on and are exposed to;
variable demand for our services, rapidly evolving technologies and markets, and consumer preferences;
any restructuring charges we may incur;
any economic downturn, which could result in lower acceptance rates on premium products and services offered by our Wealth Management business and impact the commissions and fee revenues of our financial advisory services;
the level and mix of assets we have under management and administration, which are subject to fluctuation based on market conditions and client activity;
new court rulings, or the adoption of new or interpretation of existing laws, rules, or regulations, that adversely affect our tax preparation products and services, or our wealth management offeringsbusiness or that otherwise increase our potential liability or compliance costs;
impairment in the value of long-lived assets or the value of acquired assets, including goodwill, technology, and acquired contracts and relationships; and
the effect of changes in accounting principles or standards or in our accounting treatment of revenues or expenses.
For these reasons, among others, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of our financial results to forecast our future performance. Furthermore, our fluctuating operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors and financial results volatility could make us less attractive to investors, either of which could cause the trading price of our stock to decline.
|
|
If there is a change in our ownership within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards (“Our utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) may be severely limited or potentially eliminated.
|
As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had federal NOLs of $504.0$519.7 million that will expire primarily between 2020 and 2027, with the majority of them expiring between 2020 and 2024. We are currently able to offset all of our tax liabilities with our NOLs, but we don’t expect to generate sufficient taxable income in future years to utilize all of our NOLs prior to their expiration. If our NOLs expire unused, their full benefit will not be achieved. In addition, in years where our income exceeds our NOLs, which we expect to begin occurring in 2022, we will be required to make additional income tax payments.
In addition, if we were to have a change of ownership within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (defined as a cumulative change of 50 percentage points or more in the ownership positions of certain stockholders owning five percent or more of a company’s common stock over a three-year rolling period), then under certain conditions, the amount of NOLs we could use in any one year could be limited. Our certificate of incorporation imposes certain limited transfer restrictions on our common stock that we expect will assist us in preventing a change of ownership and preserving our NOLs, but there can be no assurance that these restrictions will be sufficient. In addition, other restrictions on our ability to use the NOLs may be triggered by a merger or acquisition, depending on the structure of such a transaction. It is our intention to limit the potential impact of these restrictions, but there can be no guarantee that such efforts will be successful.
If we are unable to use our NOLs before they expire, or if the use of this tax benefit is severely limited or eliminated, there could be a material reduction in the amount of after-tax income and cash flow from operations, and it could have an effect on our ability to engage in certain transactions.
|
|
| Delaware law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover, which could cause the market price of our shares to decline. |
We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third party to acquire us, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. For example, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay, or prevent a third party from acquiring us without the consent of our board of directors, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. Provisions of our charter documents that could have an anti-takeover effect include:
the classification of our board of directors, which is being phased out between 2017 and 2020, into three groups so that directors serve staggered three-year terms, which may make it difficult for a potential acquirer to gain control of our board of directors;
the requirement for super majority approval by stockholders for certain business combinations;
the ability of our board of directors to authorize the issuance of shares of undesignated preferred stock without a vote by stockholders;
the ability of our board of directors to amend or repeal our bylaws;
limitations on the removal of directors;
limitations on stockholders’ ability to call special stockholder meetings;
advance notice requirements for nominating candidates for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and
certain restrictions in our charter on transfers of our common stock designed to preserve our federal NOLs.
At our 2009 annual meeting, our stockholders approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation that restricts any person or entity from attempting to transfer our stock, without prior permission from the Board of Directors, to the extent that such transfer would (i) create or result in an individual or entity becoming a five-percent stockholder of our stock, or (ii) increase the stock ownership percentage of any existing five-percent stockholder. This amendment provides that any transfer that violates its provisions shall be null and void and would require the purported transferee to, upon our demand, transfer the shares that exceed the five percent limit to an agent designated by us for the purpose of conducting a sale of such excess shares. This provision in our certificate of incorporation may make the acquisition of Blucora more expensive to the acquirer and could significantly delay, discourage, or prevent third parties from acquiring Blucora without the approval of our board of directors.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 2. Properties
All of our facilities are leased. We believe our properties are suitable and adequate for our present and anticipated near-term needs.
Our principal corporate office currently is located in Bellevue, Washington, although we announced on October 27, 2016 that we would be relocating it to Irving, Texas by June 2017.Texas. The headquarters and data center facility for our HD Vest business, which comprises our Wealth Management segment, are in Irving, Texas, and we have a backup data center for our HD Vest business in Elk Grove, Illinois, along withas well as access to multiple disaster recovery and data center locationscenters across the country through a third party vendor. The headquarters and data center facility for our TaxAct business, which comprises our Tax Preparation segment, are in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and we havealso use a cloud computing platform for disaster recovery data center for our TaxAct business in Waukee, Iowa.recovery.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
See "Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for information regarding legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for Our Common Stock
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BCOR.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market. | | | | High | | Low | High | | Low |
| Year ended December 31, 2017 | | | | |
| First Quarter | | $ | 18.00 |
| | $ | 14.25 |
|
| Second Quarter | | $ | 22.50 |
| | $ | 16.65 |
|
| Third Quarter | | $ | 25.95 |
| | $ | 19.40 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | | $ | 26.15 |
| | $ | 19.05 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2016 | | | | | | |
| First Quarter | $ | 9.98 |
| | $ | 4.76 |
| $ | 10.11 |
| | $ | 4.69 |
|
| Second Quarter | $ | 10.36 |
| | $ | 4.89 |
| $ | 10.55 |
| | $ | 4.96 |
|
| Third Quarter | $ | 12.99 |
| | $ | 10.07 |
| $ | 13.03 |
| | $ | 9.64 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 15.80 |
| | $ | 11.26 |
| $ | 15.85 |
| | $ | 10.98 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2015 | | | | |
| First Quarter | $ | 15.04 |
| | $ | 12.88 |
| |
| Second Quarter | $ | 16.60 |
| | $ | 13.65 |
| |
| Third Quarter | $ | 16.20 |
| | $ | 13.14 |
| |
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 14.81 |
| | $ | 9.55 |
| |
On February 21, 2017,2018, the last reported sale price for our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $15.80$24.50 per share.
Holders
As of February 21, 2017,2018, there were 393373 holders of record of our common stock. A substantially greater number of holders are beneficial owners whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers, and other financial institutions.
Dividends
There were no dividends paid in 20162017 and 2015.2016.
Share Repurchases
See "Note 11: Stockholders' Equity" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information regarding the Company’s stock repurchase program. There was no share repurchase activity during the fourth quarterprogram that concluded in May 2016.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following data are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read along with "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II Item 7, our consolidated financial statements and notes in Part II Item 8, and other financial information included elsewhere in this report.
| | | | | Years ended December 31, | | Years ended December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | (2) | (In thousands, except per share data) | (1) | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services revenue | (1) | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 348,620 |
| | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Tax preparation services revenue | (1) | 139,365 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
| | 91,213 |
| | 62,105 |
| | 160,937 |
| | 139,365 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
| | 91,213 |
|
| Total revenue | (1) | 455,911 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
| | 91,213 |
| | 62,105 |
| | 509,557 |
| | 455,911 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
| | 91,213 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | (1) | 37,117 |
| | (4,807 | ) | | 4,603 |
| | (3,478 | ) | | (13,138 | ) | | 48,037 |
| | 37,117 |
| | (4,807 | ) | | 4,603 |
| | (3,478 | ) |
| Other loss, net | (1) | (39,781 | ) | | (12,542 | ) | | (13,489 | ) | | (29,568 | ) | | (6,630 | ) | | (44,551 | ) | | (39,781 | ) | | (12,542 | ) | | (13,489 | ) | | (29,568 | ) |
| Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | (2,664 | ) | | (17,349 | ) | | (8,886 | ) | | (33,046 | ) | | (19,768 | ) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 3,486 |
| | (2,664 | ) | | (17,349 | ) | | (8,886 | ) | | (33,046 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | (1) | 1,285 |
| | 4,623 |
| | 3,342 |
| | 7,385 |
| | 5,184 |
|
| 25,890 |
| | 1,285 |
| | 4,623 |
| | 3,342 |
| | 7,385 |
|
| Loss from continuing operations | | (1,379 | ) | | (12,726 | ) | | (5,544 | ) | | (25,661 | ) | | (14,584 | ) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 29,376 |
| | (1,379 | ) | | (12,726 | ) | | (5,544 | ) | | (25,661 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (1) (3) | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) | | (30,003 | ) | | 50,060 |
| | 37,110 |
| (2) | — |
| | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) | | (30,003 | ) | | 50,060 |
|
| Net income (loss) | | (64,500 | ) | | (40,074 | ) | | (35,547 | ) | | 24,399 |
| | 22,526 |
| | 29,376 |
| | (64,500 | ) | | (40,074 | ) | | (35,547 | ) | | 24,399 |
|
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | (658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,337 | ) | | (658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) | | $ | 24,399 |
| | $ | 22,526 |
| |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | | $ | 27,039 |
| | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) | | $ | 24,399 |
|
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | | $ | (0.62 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | | 1.21 |
| | 0.92 |
| | — |
| | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | | 1.21 |
|
| Basic net income (loss) per share | | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | 0.59 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding, basic | | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| | 41,201 |
| | 40,279 |
| | 44,370 |
| | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| | 41,201 |
|
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | | $ | (0.62 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | | 1.21 |
| | 0.92 |
| | — |
| | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | | 1.21 |
|
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | | $ | 0.59 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| | 41,201 |
| | 40,279 |
| | 47,211 |
| | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| | 41,201 |
|
| | | Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | (2) | | (1) | |
| Cash, cash equivalents, and investments | | $ | 58,814 |
| | $ | 66,774 |
| | $ | 293,588 |
| | $ | 323,429 |
| | $ | 162,295 |
| | $ | 59,965 |
| | $ | 58,814 |
| | $ | 66,774 |
| | $ | 293,588 |
| | $ | 323,429 |
|
| Working capital | (3) (4) (5) | 43,480 |
| | 174,571 |
| | 299,431 |
| | 140,100 |
| | 142,311 |
| (2) (3) (4) | 47,641 |
| | 43,480 |
| | 174,571 |
| | 299,431 |
| | 140,100 |
|
| Total assets | | 1,022,659 |
| | 1,299,548 |
| | 865,775 |
| | 969,677 |
| | 581,699 |
| | 1,001,671 |
| | 1,022,659 |
| | 1,299,548 |
| | 865,775 |
| | 969,677 |
|
| Total long-term liabilities | (3) (4) (5) (6) | 535,577 |
| | 656,122 |
| | 311,692 |
| | 171,268 |
| | 98,945 |
| (2) (3) (4) (5) | 390,495 |
| | 535,577 |
| | 656,122 |
| | 311,692 |
| | 171,268 |
|
| Total stockholders’ equity | | 417,019 |
| | 462,284 |
| | 479,025 |
| | 514,070 |
| | 415,450 |
| | 541,387 |
| | 417,019 |
| | 462,284 |
| | 479,025 |
| | 514,070 |
|
| |
(1) | For a discussion of activity in 2014 through 2016, see "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II Item 7 of this report. |
| |
(2)
| On December 31, 2015, we acquired HD Vest. See "Note 3: Business Combinations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report. |
| |
(3)(2)
| On October 14, 2015, we announced plans to divest the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses. Accordingly, the operating results of these businesses have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented, and the related balance sheet data have been classified in their entirety within current assets and current liabilities as of December 31, 2015 but classified within current and long-term assets and liabilities, as appropriate, for prior periods. We sold the Search and Content business and the E-Commerce business on August 9, 2016 and November 17, 2016, respectively. |
| |
(4)(3)
| During 2016 and 2015, and 2014, the Convertible Senior Notes (the "Notes") were classified as a long-term liability with an outstanding balance, net of discount and issuance costs, of $164.2 million, $185.9 million, and $181.1$185.9 million, respectively. The Notes were |
were classified as a current liability in 2013. See "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
| |
(5)(4)
| We had the following debt activity. See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" and "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.report for a discussion of debt activity.
|
| |
◦ | In 2015, TaxAct and HD Vest entered into a credit facility agreement, which had an outstanding balance, net of any discount and issuance costs and including any short-term portion, of $247.6 million and $379.1 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
| |
◦ | In 2013, Monoprice entered into a credit facility agreement, and TaxAct entered into a new credit facility agreement (to replace the one entered into in 2012). These arrangements had total outstanding balances, net of any discounts and including any short-term portions $25.0 million and nil, respectively, as of December 31, 2015; $41.8 million and $51.9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014; and $49.7 million and $71.4 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. The Monoprice credit facility was closed in 2016, and the TaxAct credit facility was closed in 2015. |
| |
◦ | During 2012, TaxAct entered into a credit facility agreement, under which $73.9 million, net of discount and including the short-term portion, was outstanding as of December 31, 2012. |
| |
(6)(5)
| During 2013, the Monoprice acquisition resulted in a $27.7 million deferred tax liability related to intangible assets. |
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. See Part I "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with those statements. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in the section titled "Risk Factors."
Introduction
Blucora operates two businesses: a Wealth Management business and an online Tax Preparation business. The Wealth Management business consists of the operations of HD Vest, which we acquired on December 31, 2015. HD Vest is included in Blucora's results of operations beginning on January 1, 2016. HD Vest provides wealth management solutions for financial advisors and their clients. The Tax Preparation business consists of the operations of TaxAct and provides digital tax preparation solutions for consumers, small business owners, and tax professionals.
Prior to 2017, Blucora also operated an internet Search and Content business and an E-Commerce business. The Search and Content business, InfoSpace, providedoperated a number of digital businesses in search, directory, online commerce, media, and mobile infrastructure markets, with operations since 2008 focusing on internet search services to users of its owned and operated and distribution partners' web properties, as well as online content through HSW.content. The E-Commerce business consisted of the operations of Monoprice and sold self-branded electronics and accessories to both consumers and businesses.
Strategic Transformation
On October 14, 2015, wethe Company announced as part of the Strategic Transformation ourits plans to acquire HD Vest and focus on the technology-enabled financial solutions market. The Strategic Transformation refers to ourthe Company's transformation into a technology-enabled financial solutions company comprised of TaxAct and HD Vest (see "Note 3: Business Combinations") and the divestitures of ourthe Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses in 2016.2016 (see "Note 4: Discontinued Operations"). As part of the Strategic Transformation and “One Company”"One Company" operating model, wethe Company announced on October 27, 2016 plans to relocate ourits corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. In connection with this plan, we have incurred restructuring costs of approximately $7.0 million. These costs are recorded within corporate-level activity for segment purposes. See "Note 5: Restructuring" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information. We also have incurred costs that were not included as restructuring, such as recruiting and overlap in personnel expenses as we transition positions to Texas ("Strategic Transformation Costs"). The transformation isactions to relocate corporate headquarters were intended to drive efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness. We also shifted our near-term capital allocation priorityeffectiveness (see "Note 5: Restructuring"). The restructuring is now substantially complete and paid down debt, which included using all of the net divestiture proceeds from the sales of the Search and Content and E-Commerce businessesit is expected to pay down the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility. The elements of our Strategic Transformation are described in more detail below.be completed by early 2018. For a discussion of the associated risks, see the section in our Risk Factors (Part I Item 1A. of this report) under the heading "Risks Associated With our Strategic Transformation.Business."
Acquisition:Acquisitions: On December 31, 2015, we acquired HD Vest for $613.7 million, including cash acquired of $38.9 million and after a $1.8 million final working capital adjustment in the first quarter of 2016. HD Vest provides wealth management solutions for financial advisors and their clients and is expected to be synergistic with TaxAct as a result of cross-serving opportunities and an expanded addressable market for both HD Vest and TaxAct. The acquisition was funded by a combination of cash on hand and the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, under which we borrowed $400.0 million.million (the "TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility"). During the last half of 2015, we incurred transaction costs of $11.0 million.
On July 2, 2015, TaxAct acquired SimpleTax, a provider of online tax preparation services for individuals in Canada through its website www.simpletax.ca, for cash and additional consideration of up to $3.7 million that is contingent upon product availability and revenue performance over a three-year period.
See "Note 3: Business Combinations" and "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information on the HD Vest acquisition, the SimpleTax acquisition, and the credit facility, respectively.
Business divestitures and chief executive officer change:divestitures: On October 14, 2015, we announced plans to divest the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses. Accordingly, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows reflect the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Unless otherwise specified, disclosures in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" reflect continuing operations.
We completed both divestitures in 2016. Specifically, on November 17, 2016, we closed on an agreement with YFC, under which YFC acquired the E-Commerce business for $40.5 million, which included a working capital adjustment. Of this amount, $39.5 million was received in the fourth quarter of 2016 and the remaining $1.0 million is expected to bewas received in the first half of 2017. On August 9, 2016, we closed on an agreement with OpenMail, under which OpenMail acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain specified liabilities of the Search and Content business for $45.2 million, which included a working capital adjustment. We used all of the proceeds from these sales to pay down debt. We also incurred employee-related business exit costs of approximately $4.5 million, which primarily were recorded in discontinued operations. See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information on discontinued operations.
On October 14, 2015, we also announced the departure of our former chief executive officer. His departure became effective March 31, 2016. In conjunction with such announcement, we recorded $1.8 million of separation-related costs, most of which were pursuant to the former chief executive officer's employment agreement and paid in April 2016. On March 12, 2016, our Board of Directors appointed our new chief executive officer, effective April 4, 2016.
Relocation of corporate headquarters: On October 27, 2016, we announced plans to relocate our corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. In connection with this plan, we expect to incur restructuring costs of approximately $5.4 million, of which approximately $0.6 million are non-cash expenses. These costs will be recorded within corporate-level activity for segment purposes. In addition, we have a non-cancelable operating lease that runs through 2020 for our Bellevue facility, which we will occupy until June 2017. We currently are evaluating various cost mitigation options, including a sublease of the facility and the related leasehold improvements and office furniture and equipment. If we are unable to sublease, we could incur contract termination fees and fixed asset-related costs. If we are able to sublease, we could incur costs related to tenant improvement allowance, rent abatement, and/or broker commissions. See "Note 5: Restructuring" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information.
Our Continuing Businesses
Wealth Management
The HD VestOur Wealth Management business provides wealth management solutions for financial advisors, and their clients. Specifically,who affiliate with HD Vest providesVest's registered broker-dealer investment adviser and/or insurance subsidiaries as independent contractors, an integrated, open platform that includes a broad variety of products offered through our brokerage, investment advisory, and insurance services to assist in making each financial advisor a financial service center for his/her clients. We regularly review the commissions and fees we charge for these products and services in light of the evolving regulatory and competitive environment and changes in client preferences and needs. We do not offer any proprietary products. HD Vest generates revenue primarily through commissions, quarterly investment advisory fees based on assets under management, and other fees.
HD Vest was founded to help tax and accounting professionals integrate financial services into their practices. HD Vest primarily recruits independent tax professionals with established tax practices and offers specialized training and support, which allows them to join the HD Vest platform as independent financial advisors. HD Vest's business model provides an open-architecture investment platform and technology tools to help financial advisors identify investment opportunities for their clients, while the long-standing tax advisory relationships provide a large client base of possible investment clients. This results in an experienced and stable network of financial advisors, who have multiple revenue-generating options to diversify their earnings sources. HD Vest also has a highly experienced home office team that is focused on solutions tailored to the advisor's practice. The home office team provides marketing, practice management, insurance and annuity, wealth management, succession planning, and other support to our advisors.
Our Wealth Management business is directly and indirectly sensitive to several macroeconomic factors and the state of financial markets, particularly in the United States. For additional information regarding the potential impact of these macroeconomic factors on our operations and results, see the Risk Factors "Our financial conditionChanges in domestic and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by market fluctuations and byinternational economic, political and other factors." and "A drop infactors could have a Material Adverse Effect on our investment performance could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.business" in Part I Item 1A of this report.
Our Wealth Management business is subject to certain additional financial industry regulations and supervision, including by the SEC, FINRA, DOL, state securities and insurance regulators, and other regulatory authorities. For additional
information regarding the potential impact of governmental regulation on our operations and results, see the Risk Factor "Increased governmentGovernment regulation of our business, may harm our operating results.including increased regulation or the interpretation of existing laws, rules or regulations, could have a Material Adverse Effect" and "Our Wealth Management business is subject to extensive regulation, and failure to comply with these regulations could have a Material Adverse Effect" in Part I Item 1A of this report.
Tax Preparation
Our TaxActTax Preparation business provides DDIY tax preparation solutions for consumers and small business owners, and preparation software for tax professionals. TaxAct generates revenue primarily through its online service at www.TaxAct.com. The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and Canada.
TaxAct's offerings come with a price lock guarantee, whereby the price at the start of the tax return filing process is the price when the return is filed, rather than pricing the offering at the time that the tax return is filed. We believe this price lock guarantee ensures price transparency and differentiates TaxAct from its competitors.
We had fourthree offerings for consumers for tax year 2015,2016, which is the basis for TaxAct's 20162017 operating results: a "free" federal and state edition that handled simple returns; a "basic" offering that contained all of the features of the free federal edition in addition to import capabilities, taxpayer phone support, and return preparation assistance tools; a "plus" offering that contained all of the basic offering features in addition to tools to maximize credits and deductions, and enhanced reporting; and a "premium" offering that contained all of the plus offering features in addition to tools for self-employed individuals to maximize credits and deductions. For the latter threeour offerings, state returns can be filed for free for free simple filers, or through the separately-sold state edition. We also had an offering for small business owners. In addition to these core offerings, TaxAct also offers ancillary services such as refund payment transfer, data archive services, audit defense, stored value cards, and other add-on services.retirement investment accounts through HD Vest, and a marketplace for customers to take advantage of personalized tax and financial savings opportunities through third party product providers.
TaxAct’s professional tax preparer software allows professional tax preparers to file individual and business returns for their clients. TaxAct offers flexible pricing and packaging options that help tax professionals save money by paying only for what they need.
Acquisitions
On December 31, 2015, we closed on our acquisition of HD Vest, as described further under "Strategic Transformation" above. HD Vest is included in Blucora's results of operations as of January 1, 2016. Accordingly, the results discussed below were impacted by the timing of this acquisition, in which 2016 includes a full year of results as compared to no results in 2015.
On July 2, 2015, TaxAct acquired SimpleTax, a provider of online tax preparation services for individuals in Canada through its website www.simpletax.ca, for C$2.4 million (with C$ indicating Canadian dollars and amounting to approximately $1.9 million based on the acquisition-date exchange rate) in cash and additional consideration of up to C$4.6 million ($3.7 million) that is contingent upon product availability and revenue performance over a three-year period. SimpleTax is included in our financial results beginning on July 2, 2015.
Seasonality
Our Tax Preparation segment is highly seasonal, with a significant portion of its annual revenue earned in the first four months of our fiscal year. During the third and fourth quarters, the Tax Preparation segment typically reports losses because revenue from the segment is minimal while core operating expenses continue. We anticipate that the seasonal nature of that part of the business will continue at relatively consistent levels.in the foreseeable future.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Summary
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Percentage Change | | 2015 | | Percentage Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 | | Percentage Change | | 2015 |
| Revenue | $ | 455,911 |
| | 287 | % | | $ | 117,708 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 103,719 |
| $ | 509,557 |
| | 12 | % | | $ | 455,911 |
| | 287 | % | | $ | 117,708 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | $ | 37,117 |
| | (872 | )% | | $ | (4,807 | ) | | (204 | )% | | $ | 4,603 |
| $ | 48,037 |
| | 29 | % | | $ | 37,117 |
| | 872 | % | | $ | (4,807 | ) |
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Revenue increased approximately $53.6 million due to increases of $32.1 million and $21.6 million in revenue related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, respectively, as discussed in the following "Segment Revenue/Operating Income" section.
Operating income increased approximately $10.9 million, consisting of the $53.6 million increase in revenue and offset by a $42.7 million increase in operating expenses. Key changes in operating expenses were:
$27.5 million increase in the Wealth Management segment's operating expenses due to higher commissions paid to our financial advisors, which fluctuated in proportion to the change in underlying commission and advisory revenues earned on client accounts, and higher net personnel expenses as we continue to standardize employee benefits across our businesses.
$15.5 million increase in the Tax Preparation segment’s operating expenses, primarily due to higher spending on marketing, higher professional services fees mostly related to marketing and development projects, higher data center costs related to software support and maintenance fees, increases in growth initiative investments, and higher personnel expenses.
$0.3 million decrease in corporate-level expense activity primarily due to lower stock-based compensation costs due to fewer grants in the current year and higher expense recognized in the prior year related to grants made to HD Vest employees in 2016 in connection with the HD Vest acquisition, partially offset by activity within our Tax Preparation business due to prior forfeitures, and lower personnel costs, both offset by Strategic Transformation Costs.
Segment results are discussed in the next section.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Revenue increased approximately $338.2 million due to increases of $316.5 million and $21.7 million in revenue related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, respectively. Wealth Management revenue increased due to the timing of the HD Vest acquisition, and Tax Preparation revenue increased as discussed in the following "Segment Revenue/Operating Income" section.
Operating income increased approximately $41.9 million, consisting of the $338.2 million increase in revenue and offset by a $296.3 million increase in operating expenses. Key changes in operating expenses were:
$270.3 million increase in the Wealth Management segment's operating expenses due to the timing of the HD Vest acquisition.
$11.7 million increase in the Tax Preparation segment’s operating expenses, primarily due to higher spending on marketing, higher personnel expenses resulting from overall increased headcount supporting most functions, higher data center costs mostly related to third-party technology fees (software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting, and professional services), higher third-party costs associated with additional features in the current year offerings, and an increase in professional services fees mostly related to development projects.
$14.3 million increase in corporate-level expense activity, primarily due to (i) higher amortization expense related to HD Vest acquisition-related intangible assets, (ii) higher stock-based compensation mainly related to a net increase in stock award grants (including to HD Vest employees), (iii) restructuring incurred in connection with the upcoming relocation of our corporate headquarters, (iv) higher depreciation expense mainly related to HD Vest fixed assets, and (v) higher personnel expenses resulting mainly from increased costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation, offset by (vi) lower acquisition-related costs due to professional services fees and other direct transaction costs incurred in the prior year related to the HD Vest acquisition, (vii) lower amortization expense associated with concluding the useful life of certain TaxAct acquisition-related intangible assets during 2016, and (viii) separation-related costs incurred in the prior year in connection with the departure of our former chief executive officer.
Segment results are discussed in the next section.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Revenue increased approximately $14.0 million due to an increase in revenue related to our Tax Preparation business, as discussed in the following "Segment Revenue/Operating Income" section.
Operating income decreased approximately $9.4 million, consisting of the $14.0 million increase in revenue and offset by a $23.4 million increase in operating expenses. Key changes in operating expenses were:
$6.7 million increase in the Tax Preparation segment’s operating expenses, primarily due to higher personnel expenses resulting from increased average headcount, higher spending on marketing campaigns for the related tax season, and, to a lesser extent, higher data center costs related to software support and maintenance fees.
$16.7 million increase in corporate-level expense activity, primarily due to higher professional services fees, mainly from transaction costs related to the HD Vest acquisition, and higher personnel expenses, mainly due to increased average headcount to support operations and separation-related costs in connection with the departure of our former chief executive officer.
Segment results are discussed in the next section.
SEGMENT REVENUE/OPERATING INCOME
The revenue and operating income amounts in this section are presented on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) and include certain reconciling items attributable to the segments. Segment information appearing in "Note 13: Segment Information" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report is presented on a basis consistent with our current internal management financial reporting. We do not allocate certain general and administrative costs (including personnel and overhead costs), stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, depreciation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, restructuring, other loss, net, and income taxes to segment operating results. We analyzedanalyze these separately.
Following the acquisition of HD Vest and the discontinued operations treatment of Search and Content and E-Commerce, we have two reportable segments: Wealth Management and Tax Preparation.
Wealth Management
On December 31, 2015, we acquired HD Vest, a provider of wealth management solutions for financial advisors and their clients. HD Vest is included in Blucora's results of operations as of January 1, 2016.
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Year ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 |
| Revenue | $ | 316,546 |
| $ | 348,620 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 316,546 |
|
| Operating income | $ | 46,296 |
| $ | 50,916 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 46,296 |
|
| Segment margin | 15 | % | 15 | % | | — | % | | 15 | % |
Wealth Management revenue is derived from multiple sources. We track sources of revenue, primary drivers of each revenue source, and recurring revenue. In addition, we focus on several business and key financial metrics in evaluating the success of our business relationships and our resulting financial position and operating performance. A summary of our sources of revenue and business metrics are as follows.
Sources of revenue
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | (In thousands, except percentages) | Year ended December 31, | (In thousands, except percentages) | Year ended December 31, |
| | Sources of Revenue | Primary Drivers | 2016 | Sources of Revenue | Primary Drivers | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 |
Advisor-driven
| Commission | - Transactions - Asset levels | $ | 150,125 |
| Commission | - Transactions - Asset levels | $ | 160,241 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 150,125 |
|
| Advisory | - Advisory asset levels | 129,417 |
| Advisory | - Advisory asset levels | 145,694 |
| | 13 | % | | 129,417 |
|
| Other revenue | Asset-based | - Cash balances - Interest rates - Number of accounts - Client asset levels | 22,653 |
| Asset-based | - Cash balances - Interest rates - Number of accounts - Client asset levels | 26,297 |
| | 16 | % | | 22,653 |
|
| Transaction and fee | - Account activity - Number of clients - Number of advisors - Number of accounts | 14,351 |
| Transaction and fee | - Account activity
- Number of clients
- Number of advisors
- Number of accounts | 16,388 |
| | 14 | % | | 14,351 |
|
| | Total revenue | $ | 316,546 |
| Total revenue | $ | 348,620 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 316,546 |
|
| | Total recurring revenue | $ | 249,310 |
| Total recurring revenue | $ | 277,546 |
| | 11 | % | | $ | 249,310 |
|
| | Recurring revenue rate | 78.8 | % | Recurring revenue rate | 79.6 | % | | | | 78.8 | % |
Recurring revenue consists of trailing commissions, advisory fees, fees from cash sweep programs, and certain transaction and fee revenue, all as described further below in Commission revenue, Advisory revenue, Asset-based revenue, and Transaction and fee revenue, respectively. Certain recurring revenues are associated with asset balances and will fluctuate depending on market values and current interest rates. Accordingly, our recurring revenue can be negatively impacted by adverse external market conditions. However, recurring revenue is meaningful despite these fluctuations because it is not dependent upon transaction volumes or other activity-based revenues, which are more difficult to predict, particularly in declining or volatile markets.
Business metrics
| | | (In thousands, except percentages and as otherwise indicated) | December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 |
| Total Assets Under Administration (“AUA”) | $ | 38,663,595 |
| $ | 44,178,710 |
| | 14 | % | | $ | 38,663,595 |
|
| Advisory Assets Under Management (“AUM”) | $ | 10,397,071 |
| $ | 12,530,165 |
| | 21 | % | | $ | 10,397,071 |
|
| Percentage of total AUA | 26.9 | % | 28.4 | % | |
| | 26.9 | % |
| Number of advisors (in ones) | 4,472 |
| 3,999 |
| | (11 | )% | | 4,472 |
|
| Advisor-driven revenue per advisor | | 20.4 |
| | 25 | % | | 16.3 |
|
Total assets under administration ("AUA") includes assets that we hold directly or indirectly on behalf of clients under a safekeeping or custody arrangement or for which we provide administrative services for clients. To the extent that we provide more than one AUA service for a client’s assets, the value of the asset is only counted once in the total amount of AUA. AUA assets include Advisory Assets under Management, non-advisory brokerage accounts, annuities and mutual fund positions held directly with fund companies. These assets are not reported on the consolidated balance sheets.
Advisory assets under management ("AUM") includes external client assets for which we provide investment advisory and management services, typically as a fiduciary under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Our compensation for providing such services is typically a fee based on the value of the AUM for each advisory client. These assets are not reported on the consolidated balance sheets.
As we reduce disengaged advisors, the number of advisors could continue to decrease before stabilizing. This decrease could improve the growth in advisor-driven revenues per advisor, prior to advisor stabilization.
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Wealth Management revenue increased approximately $32.1 million by each source of revenue discussed below.
Wealth Management operating income increased approximately $4.6 million, consisting of the $32.1 million increase in revenue, offset by a $27.5 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in Wealth Management operating expenses was primarily due to higher commissions paid to our financial advisors, which fluctuated in proportion to the change in underlying commission and advisory revenues earned on client accounts, and higher net personnel expenses as we continue to standardize employee benefits across our businesses.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
On December 31, 2015, we acquired HD Vest., which is included in Blucora's results of operations as of January 1, 2016.
Commission revenue: We generate two types of commissions: transaction-based sales commissions and trailing commissions. Transaction-based sales commissions, which occur when clients trade securities or purchase investment products, represent gross commissions generated by our financial advisors. The level of transaction-based sales commissions can vary from period to periodperiod-to-period based on the overall economic environment, number of trading days in the reporting period, and investment activity of our financial advisors' clients. We earn trailing commissions (a commission or fee that is paid periodically over time) on certain mutual funds and variable annuities held by clients. Trailing commissions are recurring in nature and are based on the market value of investment holdings in trail-eligible assets. Our commission revenue, by product category and by sales-based and trailing, was as follows:
| | | (In thousands) | Year ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 |
| By product category: | | | | | | |
| Mutual funds | $ | 79,476 |
| $ | 84,159 |
| | 6 | % | | $ | 79,476 |
|
| Variable annuities | 47,641 |
| 51,385 |
| | 8 | % | | 47,641 |
|
| Insurance | 11,909 |
| 13,146 |
| | 10 | % | | 11,909 |
|
| General securities | 11,099 |
| 11,551 |
| | 4 | % | | 11,099 |
|
| Total commission revenue | $ | 150,125 |
| $ | 160,241 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 150,125 |
|
| By sales-based and trailing: | | | |
| | |
| Sales-based | $ | 64,452 |
| $ | 68,199 |
| | 6 | % | | $ | 64,452 |
|
| Trailing | 85,673 |
| 92,042 |
| | 7 | % | | 85,673 |
|
| Total commission revenue | $ | 150,125 |
| $ | 160,241 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 150,125 |
|
In 2017, sales-based commission revenue increased approximately $3.7 million primarily due to increased activity in mutual funds, insurance and general securities resulting from overall market performance, portfolio rebalancings, product availability and segment refocusing. General securities include equities, exchange-traded funds, bonds and alternative investments.
In 2017, trailing commission revenue increased approximately $6.4 million and reflects an increase in the market value of the underlying assets and the impact of new investments.
Advisory revenue: Advisory revenue primarily includes fees charged to clients in advisory accounts where HD Vest is the Registered Investment AdvisorAdviser (“RIA”) and is based on the value of advisory assets under management.AUM. Advisory fees are typically billed to clients quarterly, in advance, and are recognized as revenue ratably during the quarter. The value of the assets in an advisory account on the billing date determines the amount billed and, accordingly, the revenues earned in the following three-month period. The majority of our accounts are billed in advance using values as of the last business day of the prior calendar quarter.
The activity within our advisory assets under managementAUM was as follows:
| | | (In thousands) | Year ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 9,692,244 |
| $ | 10,397,071 |
| | $ | 9,692,244 |
|
| Net increase in new advisory assets | 150,701 |
| 794,184 |
| | 150,701 |
|
| Market impact and other | 554,126 |
| 1,338,910 |
| | 554,126 |
|
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 10,397,071 |
| $ | 12,530,165 |
| | $ | 10,397,071 |
|
Increases or decreases in advisory assets have a limited impact on advisory fee revenue in the period in which they occur. Rather, increases or decreases in advisory assets are a primary driver of future advisory fee revenue. Advisory revenue for a particular quarter is predominately driven by the prior quarter-end AUM.
In 2017, the increase in advisory assets under management.revenue of approximately $16.3 million is consistent with the increase in the beginning-of-period AUM for 2017 compared with 2016.
Asset-based revenue: Asset-based revenue primarily includes fees from financial product manufacturer sponsorship programs and cash sweep programs.
In 2017, asset-based revenue increased $3.6 million, primarily from higher cash sweep revenues following increases in interest rates. In the current interest rate environment, and through our current clearing provider, we will not benefit from any future interest rate increases. We expect the 2018 transition of our clearing business to a new clearing firm to provide growth opportunities in asset-based revenues.
Transaction and fee revenue: Transaction and fee revenue primarily includes fees for executing certain transactions in client accounts and fees related to services provided and other account charges as generally outlined in agreements with financial advisors, clients, and financial institutions.
In 2017, transaction and fee revenue increased approximately $2.0 million primarily related to advisor fee increases.
Tax Preparation
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| Percentage Change |
| 2015 | | Percentage
Change | | 2014 | 2017 |
| Percentage Change |
| 2016 | | Percentage
Change | | 2015 |
| Revenue | $ | 139,365 |
| | 18 | % | | $ | 117,708 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 103,719 |
| $ | 160,937 |
| | 15 | % | | $ | 139,365 |
| | 18 | % | | $ | 117,708 |
|
| Operating income | $ | 66,897 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 56,984 |
| | 15 | % | | $ | 49,696 |
| $ | 72,921 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 66,897 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 56,984 |
|
| Segment margin | 48 | % | | | | 48 | % | | | | 48 | % | 45 | % | | | | 48 | % | | | | 48 | % |
Tax Preparation revenue is derived primarily from sales of our consumer tax preparation software and online services as well as other offerings and ancillary services to consumers and small business owners. We also generate revenue through the professional tax preparer software that we sell to professional tax preparers who use it to prepare and file individual and business returns for their clients.
Revenue by category was as follows: | | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Percentage Change | | 2015 | | Percentage Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 | | Percentage Change | | 2015 |
| Consumer | $ | 126,289 |
| | 20 | % | | $ | 105,367 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 93,097 |
| $ | 147,084 |
| | 16 | % | | $ | 126,289 |
| | 20 | % | | $ | 105,367 |
|
| Professional | 13,076 |
| | 6 | % | | 12,341 |
| | 16 | % | | 10,622 |
| 13,853 |
| | 6 | % | | 13,076 |
| | 6 | % | | 12,341 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 139,365 |
| | 18 | % | | $ | 117,708 |
| | 13 | % | | $ | 103,719 |
| $ | 160,937 |
| | 15 | % | | $ | 139,365 |
| | 18 | % | | $ | 117,708 |
|
We measure our consumer tax preparation customers using the number of accepted federal tax e-files made through our software and online services. We consider growth in the number of e-files to be the most important non-financial metric in measuring the performance of the consumer side of the Tax Preparation business. E-file metrics were as follows:
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Percentage Change | | 2015 | | Percentage Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Percentage Change | | 2016 | | Percentage Change | | 2015 |
| Online e-files | 4,759 |
| | (9 | )% | | 5,235 |
| | (1 | )% | | 5,262 |
| 4,097 |
| | (14 | )% | | 4,759 |
| | (9 | )% | | 5,235 |
|
| Desktop e-files | 244 |
| | (11 | )% | | 273 |
| | 6 | % | | 258 |
| 193 |
| | (21 | )% | | 244 |
| | (11 | )% | | 273 |
|
| Sub-total e-files | 5,003 |
| | (9 | )% | | 5,508 |
| | — | % | | 5,520 |
| 4,290 |
| | (14 | )% | | 5,003 |
| | (9 | )% | | 5,508 |
|
Free File Alliance e-files (1) | 167 |
| | (8 | )% | | 181 |
| | (18 | )% | | 222 |
| 176 |
| | 5 | % | | 167 |
| | (8 | )% | | 181 |
|
| Total e-files | 5,170 |
| | (9 | )% | | 5,689 |
| | (1 | )% | | 5,742 |
| 4,466 |
| | (14 | )% | | 5,170 |
| | (9 | )% | | 5,689 |
|
| |
(1) | Free File Alliance e-files are provided as part of an IRS partnership that provides free electronic tax filing services to taxpayers meeting certain income-based guidelines. |
We measure our professional tax preparer customers using three metrics--the number of accepted federal tax e-files made through our software, the number of units sold, and the number of e-files per unit sold. We consider growth in these areas to be the most important non-financial metrics in measuring the performance of the professional tax preparer side of the Tax Preparation business. Those metrics were as follows:
| | | (In thousands, except percentages and as | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| otherwise indicated) | 2016 | | Percentage
Change | | 2015 | | Percentage
Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Percentage
Change | | 2016 | | Percentage
Change | | 2015 |
| E-files | 1,755 |
| | 10 | % | | 1,590 |
| | 8 | % | | 1,467 |
| 1,774 |
| | 1 | % | | 1,755 |
| | 10 | % | | 1,590 |
|
| Units sold (in ones) | 20,290 |
| | 5 | % | | 19,355 |
| | 3 | % | | 18,764 |
| 20,694 |
| | 2 | % | | 20,290 |
| | 5 | % | | 19,355 |
|
| E-files per unit sold (in ones) | 86.5 |
| | 5 | % | | 82.2 |
| | 5 | % | | 78.2 |
| 85.7 |
| | (1 | )% | | 86.5 |
| | 5 | % | | 82.2 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Tax Preparation revenue increased approximately $21.6 million primarily due to growth in revenue earned from online consumer users and, to a lesser extent, increased sales of our professional tax preparer software. Online consumer revenue grew, despite a decrease in e-files, due to growth in average revenue per user, primarily resulting from price increases, which are expected to continue to be the primary driver of growth in the near future. The decrease in e-files is consistent with our expectations as we are in the early stages of a multi-year pivot toward profitable customers. Revenue derived from professional tax preparers increased primarily due to an increase in the number of professional preparer units sold.
Tax Preparation operating income increased approximately $6.0 million, consisting of the $21.6 million increase in revenue and offset by a $15.5 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in Tax Preparation segment operating expenses was primarily due to higher spending on marketing, higher professional services fees mostly related to marketing and development projects, higher data center costs related to software support and maintenance fees, increases in growth initiative investments, and higher personnel expenses.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Tax Preparation revenue increased approximately $21.7 million primarily due to growth in revenue earned from online consumer users, increased sales of ancillary services, and increased sales of our professional tax preparer software. Online consumer revenue grew, despite a decrease in e-files, due to growth in average revenue per user, primarily resulting from the re-packaging of our offerings and related price increases for tax year 2015. Revenue derived from professional tax preparers increased, primarily due to an increase in the number of professional preparer units sold.
Tax Preparation operating income increased approximately $9.9 million, consisting of the $21.7 million increase in revenue and offset by an $11.7 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in Tax Preparation segment operating expenses primarily was due to increased spending on marketing, an increase in personnel expenses resulting from overall higher headcount supporting most functions, increased data center costs mostly related to third-party technology fees (software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting, and professional services), increased third-party costs associated with additional features in the current year offerings, and an increase in professional services fees mostly related to development projects.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Tax Preparation revenue increased approximately $14.0 million primarily due to growth in revenue earned from online consumer users, increased sales of ancillary services (mostly related to bank services), and increased sales of our professional tax preparer software. Online consumer revenue grew, despite a slight decrease in e-files, due to growth in average revenue per user, primarily resulting from pricing actions and their related timing when compared to the prior year. Revenue derived from professional tax preparers also contributed to the increase, with an increase in the number of professional preparer units sold and growth in average revenue per user.
Tax Preparation operating income increased approximately $7.3 million, consisting of the $14.0 million increase in revenue and offset by a $6.7 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in Tax Preparation segment operating expenses primarily was due to an increase in personnel expenses resulting from higher average headcount supporting all functions, increased spending on marketing campaigns for the related tax season, and, to a lesser extent, increased data center costs related to software support and maintenance fees.
Corporate-Level Activity
| | | (In thousands) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| Operating expenses | $ | 18,999 |
| | $ | 1,249 |
| | $ | 17,750 |
| | $ | 3,515 |
| | $ | 14,235 |
| $ | 22,907 |
| | $ | 3,908 |
| | $ | 18,999 |
| | $ | 1,249 |
| | $ | 17,750 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 14,128 |
| | 5,434 |
| | 8,694 |
| | — |
| | 8,694 |
| 11,653 |
| | (2,475 | ) | | 14,128 |
| | 5,434 |
| | 8,694 |
|
| Acquisition-related costs | 391 |
| | (10,597 | ) | | 10,988 |
| | 10,988 |
| | — |
| — |
| | (391 | ) | | 391 |
| | (10,597 | ) | | 10,988 |
|
| CEO separation-related costs | — |
| | (1,769 | ) | | 1,769 |
| | 1,769 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,769 | ) | | 1,769 |
|
| Depreciation | 4,545 |
| | 2,258 |
| | 2,287 |
| | 315 |
| | 1,972 |
| 4,137 |
| | (408 | ) | | 4,545 |
| | 2,258 |
| | 2,287 |
|
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 34,143 |
| | 13,840 |
| | 20,303 |
| | 111 |
| | 20,192 |
| 34,002 |
| | (141 | ) | | 34,143 |
| | 13,840 |
| | 20,303 |
|
| Restructuring | 3,870 |
| | 3,870 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 3,101 |
| | (769 | ) | | 3,870 |
| | 3,870 |
| | — |
|
| Total corporate-level activity | $ | 76,076 |
| | $ | 14,285 |
| | $ | 61,791 |
| | $ | 16,698 |
| | $ | 45,093 |
| $ | 75,800 |
| | $ | (276 | ) | | $ | 76,076 |
| | $ | 14,285 |
| | $ | 61,791 |
|
Certain corporate-level activity is not allocated to our segments, including certain general and administrative costs (including personnel and overhead costs), stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, CEO separation-related costs related to the departure of our CEO in 2016, depreciation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and restructuring. For further detail, refer to segment information appearing in "Note 13: Segment Information" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Operating expenses included in corporate-level activity increased primarily due to Strategic Transformation Costs and costs associated with leadership changes at HD Vest. Strategic Transformation Costs primarily related to the relocation cost of our corporate headquarters and are not classified as restructuring. These costs are associated with transitioning of roles such as overlap in staffing and recruiting search fees.
Stock-based compensation decreased primarily due to fewer grants in the current year and higher expense recognized in the prior year related to grants made to HD Vest employees in 2016 that were made in connection with the HD Vest acquisition, partially offset by activity within our Tax Preparation business due to prior forfeitures.
Acquisition-related costs, depreciation and amortization of acquired intangible assets were comparable to the prior period.
Restructuring relates to expenses incurred in connection with the relocation of our corporate headquarters in 2017. Further detail is provided under the "Operating Expenses - Restructuring" section of the management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations below.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Operating expenses included in corporate-level activity increased primarily due to a $1.3 million net increase in personnel expenses, mainly due to costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation costs, which primarily consisted of recruiting fees in connection with the move of our headquarters, offset by lower headcount.
Stock-based compensation increased primarily due to a net increase in stock award grants (including to HD Vest employees)employees in connection with the HD Vest acquisition).
Acquisition-related costs include professional services fees and other direct transaction costs and changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities related to acquired companies. The decrease relates to professional services fees and other direct transaction costs incurred in the prior year2016 related to the HD Vest acquisition, offset by changes in the fair value of the SimpleTax contingent consideration liability, which was revalued in the second quarter of 2016.
On October 14, 2015, we announced the departure of our former chief executive officer. His departure became effective March 31, 2016. In conjunction with that 2015 announcement, we recorded $1.8 million of separation-related costs in 2015, most of which were pursuant to his employment agreement and were paid in April 2016. On March 12, 2016, our Board of Directors appointed our new chief executive officer, effective April 4, 2016.
Depreciation increased primarily due to depreciation expense on HD Vest fixed assets.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased primarily due to amortization expense on HD Vest acquisition-related intangible assets, offset by lower amortization expense associated with concluding the useful life of certain TaxAct acquisition-related intangible assets during 2016.
Restructuring increased duerelates to our October 27, 2016 announcement to relocateexpenses incurred in connection with the relocation of our corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas.in 2017. Further detail is provided under the "Operating Expenses - Restructuring" section of the management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations below.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Operating expenses included in corporate-level activity increased primarily due to a $4.2 million increase in personnel expenses, mainly from higher average headcount to support operations.
Stock-based compensation was unchanged but consisted of the following--a net increase in stock award grants, offset by stock-based compensation on stock options that vested upon the completion of the HSW acquisition in the second quarter of 2014. The Company granted stock options to certain Blucora employees who performed acquisition-related services. The vesting of such options were predicated on completing “qualified acquisitions” under the terms of the options. The completion of the HSW acquisition constituted a qualified acquisition.
Acquisition-related costs increased due to professional services fees and other direct transaction costs incurred in 2015 related to the HD Vest acquisition.
CEO separation-related costs increased as described above under the 2016-2015 period.
Depreciation increased primarily due to depreciation expense on TaxAct fixed assets.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets was comparable to the prior period.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of Revenue
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| Change |
| 2015 |
| Change |
| 2014 | 2017 |
| Change |
| 2016 |
| Change |
| 2015 |
| Wealth management services cost of revenue | $ | 213,996 |
| | $ | 213,996 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 235,859 |
| | $ | 21,863 |
| | $ | 213,996 |
| | $ | 213,996 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Tax preparation services cost of revenue | 8,368 |
| | 2,201 |
| | 6,167 |
| | 287 |
| | 5,880 |
| 10,018 |
| | 1,650 |
| | 8,368 |
| | 2,201 |
| | 6,167 |
|
| Amortization of acquired technology | 812 |
| | (6,734 | ) | | 7,546 |
| | 96 |
| | 7,450 |
| 195 |
| | (617 | ) | | 812 |
| | (6,734 | ) | | 7,546 |
|
| Total cost of revenue | $ | 223,176 |
| | $ | 209,463 |
| | $ | 13,713 |
| | $ | 383 |
| | $ | 13,330 |
| $ | 246,072 |
| | $ | 22,896 |
| | $ | 223,176 |
| | $ | 209,463 |
| | $ | 13,713 |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 49 | % | | | | 12 | % | | | | 13 | % | 48 | % | | | | 49 | % | | | | 12 | % |
We record the cost of revenue for sales of services when the related revenue is recognized. Services cost of revenue consists of costs related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, which include commissions to financial advisors, third-party costs, and costs associated with the technical support team and the operation of our data centers. Data center costs include personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, professional services fees (which include technology project consulting fees), software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting costs, and depreciation. Cost of revenue also includes the amortization of acquired technology.
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Wealth management services cost of revenue increased primarily due to an increase in commissions paid to our financial advisors, which fluctuated in proportion to the change in underlying commission and advisory revenues earned on client accounts, and higher stock-based compensation costs related to grants to certain HD Vest financial advisors made during 2017.
Tax preparation services cost of revenue increased primarily due to an increase in data center costs related to software support and maintenance fees.
Amortization of acquired technology decreased due to amortization expense associated with concluding the useful life of certain TaxAct acquisition-related intangible assets during 2016.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Wealth management services cost of revenue increased due to the timing of the HD Vest acquisition.
Tax preparation services cost of revenue increased primarily due to higher data center costs mostly related to third-party technology fees (software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting, and professional services) and higher third-party costs associated with additional features in the current year offerings.
Amortization of acquired technology decreased due to amortization expense associated with concluding the useful life of certain TaxAct acquisition-related intangible assets during 2016.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Tax preparation services cost of revenue increased primarily due to higher data center costs related to software support and maintenance fees.
Amortization of acquired technology was comparable to the prior period.
Engineering and Technology
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| Change |
| 2015 |
| Change |
| 2014 | 2017 |
| Change |
| 2016 |
| Change |
| 2015 |
| Engineering and technology | $ | 17,780 |
| | $ | 12,673 |
| | $ | 5,107 |
| | $ | 1,349 |
| | $ | 3,758 |
| $ | 19,614 |
| | $ | 1,834 |
| | $ | 17,780 |
| | $ | 12,673 |
| | $ | 5,107 |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 4 | % | | | | 4 | % | | | | 4 | % | 4 | % | | | | 4 | % | | | | 4 | % |
Engineering and technology expenses are associated with the research, development, support, and ongoing enhancements of our offerings, which include personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting, and professional services fees.
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Engineering and technology expenses increased primarily due to an increase in consulting and professional services fees, mostly related to Tax Preparation development projects.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Engineering and technology expenses increased, of whichand $8.7 million of this increase was attributable to HD Vest (excluding stock-based compensation) and related to the timing of the HD Vest acquisition. The remaining increase primarily was due to a $3.1 million increase in personnel expenses, mainly related to higher headcount in our Tax Preparation business and higher stock-based compensation due to an increase in stock award grants (including to HD Vest employees), and, to a lesser extent, an increase in professional services fees mostly related to Tax Preparation development projects.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Engineering and technology expenses increased primarily due to a $1.0 million increase in personnel expenses, primarily due to higher average headcount in our Tax Preparation business.
Sales and Marketing
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| Sales and marketing | $ | 89,360 |
| | $ | 43,506 |
| | $ | 45,854 |
| | $ | 3,183 |
| | $ | 42,671 |
| $ | 102,798 |
| | $ | 13,438 |
| | $ | 89,360 |
| | $ | 43,506 |
| | $ | 45,854 |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 20 | % | | | | 39 | % | | | | 41 | % | 20 | % | | | | 20 | % | | | | 39 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses consist principally of personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs) and the cost of temporary help and contractors for those engaged in marketing, selling, and sales support operations activities, marketing expenses associated with our HD Vest and TaxAct businesses (which primarily include television, radio, online, text, email, and sponsorship channels), and back office processing support expenses associated with our HD Vest business (occupancy and general office expenses, regulatory fees, and license fees).
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Sales and marketing expenses increased primarily due to a $7.8 million increase in marketing expenses and a $3.8 million increase in personnel expenses. The increase in marketing expenses was driven by increased marketing in our Tax Preparation business. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to the standardization of employee benefits across our businesses.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Sales and marketing expenses increased, of whichand $34.9 million of this increase was attributable to HD Vest (excluding stock-based compensation) and related to the timing of the HD Vest acquisition. The remaining increase primarily was due to a $5.6 million increase in marketing expenses and a $2.8 million increase in personnel expenses. The increase in marketing expenses was driven by increased marketing in our Tax Preparation business. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to higher stock-based compensation with an increase in stock award grants (including to HD Vest employees) and higher headcount in our Tax Preparation business.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Sales and marketing expenses increased primarily due to a $2.0 million increase in marketing expenses and a $0.8 million increase in personnel expenses. The increase in marketing expenses was driven by increased marketing campaign activity for the related tax season in our Tax Preparation business. Personnel expenses increased primarily due to higher average headcount in our Tax Preparation business.
General and Administrative
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| General and administrative | $ | 47,396 |
| | $ | 3,833 |
| | $ | 43,563 |
| | $ | 18,248 |
| | $ | 25,315 |
| $ | 52,668 |
| | $ | 5,272 |
| | $ | 47,396 |
| | $ | 3,833 |
| | $ | 43,563 |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 10 | % | | | | 37 | % | | | | 24 | % | 10 | % | | | | 10 | % | | | | 37 | % |
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, professional services fees (which include legal, audit, and tax fees), general business development and management expenses, occupancy and general office expenses, business taxes, and insurance expenses.
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
G&A expenses increased primarily due to a $4.9 million net increase in personnel expenses, mainly related to Strategic Transformation Costs and costs associated with leadership changes at HD Vest, offset by lower stock-based compensation due to fewer grants in the current year and higher expense recognized in the prior year related to the timing of grants.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
G&A expenses increased, of whichand $12.7 million of this increase was attributable to HD Vest (excluding stock-based compensation) and related to the timing of the HD Vest acquisition. There also was a $1.6 million net increase in personnel expenses. This net increase in personnel expenses included higher stock-based compensation, mainly related to a net increase in stock award grants (including to HD Vest employees), and costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation, which primarily consisted of recruiting fees, offset by $1.8 million of separation-related costs incurred in the prior year in connection with the departure of our former chief executive officer and lower headcount. These increases were offset by a $10.6$0.4 million net decrease in acquisition-related costs due to professional services fees and other direct transaction costs incurred in the prior year related to the HD Vest acquisition, offset by changes in the fair value of the SimpleTax contingent consideration liability, which was revalued in the second quarter of 2016.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
G&A expenses increased primarily due to $11.0 million in acquisition-related costs due to professional services fees and other direct transaction costs incurred in 2015 related to the HD Vest acquisition and a $6.0 million increase in personnel expenses, resulting from higher average headcount to support operations and $1.8 million of separation-related costs in connection with the departure of our former chief executive officer.
Depreciation and Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
| | | (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| Depreciation | $ | 3,881 |
| | $ | 2,360 |
| | $ | 1,521 |
| | $ | 221 |
| | $ | 1,300 |
| $ | 3,460 |
| | $ | (421 | ) | | $ | 3,881 |
| | $ | 2,360 |
| | $ | 1,521 |
|
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 33,331 |
| | 20,574 |
| | 12,757 |
| | 15 |
| | 12,742 |
| 33,807 |
| | 476 |
| | 33,331 |
| | 20,574 |
| | 12,757 |
|
| Total | $ | 37,212 |
| | $ | 22,934 |
| | $ | 14,278 |
| | $ | 236 |
| | $ | 14,042 |
| $ | 37,267 |
| | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 37,212 |
| | $ | 22,934 |
| | $ | 14,278 |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 8 | % | | | | 12 | % | | | | 14 | % | 7 | % | | | | 8 | % | | | | 12 | % |
Depreciation of property and equipment includes depreciation of computer equipment and software, office equipment and furniture, and leasehold improvements not recognized in cost of revenue. Amortization of acquired intangible assets primarily includes the amortization of customer relationships, which are amortized over their estimated lives.
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
Depreciation and amortization of acquired intangible assets were comparable to the prior year.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
Depreciation increased primarily due to depreciation expense on HD Vest fixed assets.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased primarily due to amortization expense on HD Vest acquisition-related intangible assets.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
Depreciation and amortization of acquired intangible assets were comparable to the prior period.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 |
| Restructuring | $ | 3,870 |
| | $ | 3,870 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 1 | % | | | | — | % | | | | — | % |
On October 27, 2016, we announced plans to relocate our corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas as part of the Strategic Transformation and “One Company” operating model. The actions to relocate corporate headquarters are intended to drive efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except percentages) | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| Restructuring | $ | 3,101 |
| | $ | (769 | ) | | $ | 3,870 |
| | $ | 3,870 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Percentage of revenue | 1 | % | | | | 1 | % | | | | — | % |
In connection with this plan,the Strategic Transformation, including the relocation of our headquarters, we expect to incurhave incurred restructuring costs of approximately $5.4 million.$7.0 million, which includes all costs associated with our non-cancelable operating lease. While the relocation and the related costs are expected to bewere substantially completed by June 2017, we expectthe Company expects some costs through the fourth quarter of 2017,early 2018, primarily related to employees who will continue to provide service through that time period.
The following table summarizes the activity in the restructuring liability (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Employee-Related Termination Costs | | Other Costs | | Stock-Based Compensation | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Charges | 4,234 |
| | — |
| | (364 | ) | | 3,870 |
|
| Non-cash | — |
| | — |
| | 364 |
| | 364 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 4,234 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,234 |
|
Total amount expected to be incurred (1) | $ | 4,707 |
| | $ | 155 |
| | $ | 574 |
| | $ | 5,436 |
|
| Cumulative amount incurred to date | $ | 4,234 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (364 | ) | | $ | 3,870 |
|
(1) Does not include the impact of the non-cancelable operating lease and related fixed assets, which are discussed further in the last paragraph of this section. |
Employee-related termination costs primarily include severance benefits, under both ongoing and one-time benefit arrangements that are payable at termination dates throughout 2017 with the majority expected to be paid in the second half of 2017. Other costs include office moving costs. Stock-based compensation primarily includes the impact of equity award modifications associated with employment contracts for individuals impacted by the relocation, as well as forfeitures that were recorded for severed employees.
We have a non-cancelable operating lease that runs through 2020 for our Bellevue facility, which we will occupy until June 2017. We currently are evaluating various cost mitigation options, including a subleaseSee "Note 5: Restructuring" of the facility and the related leasehold improvements and office furniture and equipment. If we are unableNotes to sublease, there could be contract termination feesConsolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of up to $2.5 million based upon a July 1, 2017 vacate date and fixed asset-related coststhis report for assets, net of deferred rent, that had a carrying value of $0.4 million as of December 31, 2016. These costs would be accrued at the termination or cease-use date, which is expected in the first half of 2017. If we are able to sublease, there could be costs related to tenant improvement allowance, rent abatement, and/or broker commissions, which would be accrued when incurred.
additional information on restructuring.
| | | (In thousands) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| Interest income | $ | (81 | ) | | $ | 528 |
| | $ | (609 | ) | | $ | (254 | ) | | $ | (355 | ) | $ | (110 | ) | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (81 | ) | | $ | 528 |
| | $ | (609 | ) |
| Interest expense | 32,424 |
| | 23,380 |
| | 9,044 |
| | (432 | ) | | 9,476 |
| 21,211 |
| | (11,213 | ) | | 32,424 |
| | 23,380 |
| | 9,044 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 1,840 |
| | 707 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 74 |
| | 1,059 |
| 1,089 |
| | (751 | ) | | 1,840 |
| | 707 |
| | 1,133 |
|
| Accretion of debt discounts | 4,690 |
| | 824 |
| | 3,866 |
| | 272 |
| | 3,594 |
| 1,947 |
| | (2,743 | ) | | 4,690 |
| | 824 |
| | 3,866 |
|
| Loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense | 1,036 |
| | 638 |
| | 398 |
| | 398 |
| | — |
| 20,445 |
| | 19,409 |
| | 1,036 |
| | 638 |
| | 398 |
|
| Gain on third party bankruptcy settlement | (172 | ) | | 956 |
| | (1,128 | ) | | (842 | ) | | (286 | ) | (116 | ) | | 56 |
| | (172 | ) | | 956 |
| | (1,128 | ) |
| Other | 44 |
| | 206 |
| | (162 | ) | | (163 | ) | | 1 |
| 85 |
| | 41 |
| | 44 |
| | 206 |
| | (162 | ) |
| Other loss, net | $ | 39,781 |
| | $ | 27,239 |
| | $ | 12,542 |
| | $ | (947 | ) | | $ | 13,489 |
| $ | 44,551 |
| | $ | 4,770 |
| | $ | 39,781 |
| | $ | 27,239 |
| | $ | 12,542 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
The decrease in interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs, and accretion of debt discounts primarily related to lower balances in the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility and the Notes due to prepayments on a portion of the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility in 2017 and 2016 and the redemption of all of the Notes in the second quarter of 2017. In 2017, the applicable interest rate margin of the Blucora senior secured credit facilities was repriced and lowered to 3.0% for Eurodollar Rate loans and 2.0% for ABR loans. This repricing should decrease future annual interest expense by approximately $2.0 million per year.
The gain on third party bankruptcy settlement related to amounts received in connection with ongoing distributions from the Lehman Brothers estate, of which we are a creditor.
See "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information on the "Loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense."
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
The increase in interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs, and accretion of debt discounts primarily related to the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, which was entered into in December 2015, offset by a lower balance on the Convertible Senior Notes, a portion of which were repurchased during the first quarter of 2016.
The loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense related to the prepayment of a portion of the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility in 2016, which resulted in the write-down of a portion of the unamortized debt discount and issuance costs. This was offset by a gain on debt extinguishment and modification expense related to the repurchase of a portion of the Convertible Senior Notes below par value during the first quarter of 2016. Further detail is above.
Income Taxes
During 2017, we recorded an income tax benefit of $25.9 million. Income tax differed from taxes at the statutory rates primarily due to the January 1, 2017 implementation of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09 on stock-based compensation (see "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information) and the impact of "H.R. 1", formerly known as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 |
| Gain on Convertible Senior Notes repurchased | $ | (7,724 | ) | | $ | (7,724 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 1,628 |
| | 1,628 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs on Convertible Senior Notes | 416 |
| | 416 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount and amortization of debt issuance costs on TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility | 6,716 |
| | 6,716 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of debt issuance costs on TaxAct 2013 credit facility | — |
| | (398 | ) | | 398 |
| | 398 |
| | — |
|
| Loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense | $ | 1,036 |
| | $ | 638 |
| | $ | 398 |
| | $ | 398 |
| | $ | — |
|
The gain on third party bankruptcy settlement relatedTax Legislation, which was effective January 1, 2018, significantly revised the U.S. tax code by, among other things, lowering the corporate income tax rate from 35% to amounts received21%. As a result of the reduction in connection with ongoing distributions from the Lehman Brothers estate, of whichcorporate income tax rate, we are a creditor.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared withre-valued our net deferred tax liabilities during the year ended December 31, 20142017. The re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in a reduction in the value of our net deferred tax liabilities of approximately $21.4 million, which is recorded as additional income tax benefit in 2017. For 2018, we expect our GAAP effective tax rate to be in the range of 5 to 10 percent, primarily driven by the release of the current portion of valuation allowances.
The decreaseTax Legislation also repealed corporate alternative minimum tax ("AMT") for tax years beginning January 1, 2018, and provides that existing AMT credit carryovers are refundable beginning in interest expense primarily related2018. We have approximately $10.9 million of AMT credit carryovers that are expected to a lower balance onbe fully refunded by 2022. Additionally, the TaxAct 2013 credit facility.
The increasechange in loss on debt extinguishment and modification expensetax law affected changes to statutes under I.R.C. 162(m) related to the closurededuction of compensation of officers, which may limit the total amount benefited by the Company in future years.
The impact of the TaxAct 2013 credit facilityTax Legislation on our 2018 effective tax rate will depend on numerous factors and assumptions. Based on preliminary information, given the numerous net operating losses available and small international footprint, the change in December 2015, at which pointtax law is not expected to significantly impact our income tax provision. The foregoing is based on information available as of the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs were written off.
The gain on third party bankruptcy settlementdate of this report and is subject to change due to a variety of factors, including, among other things, (i) management’s further assessment of the Tax Legislation and related regulatory guidance, (ii) guidance that may be issued, and (iii) actions that we may take as a result of the Tax Legislation. For further discussion of the risks related to amounts receivedthe Tax Legislation, see the paragraph in connection with ongoing distributions fromour Risk Factors (Part I Item IA of this report) under the Lehman Brothers estate, of which we are a creditor.
Income Taxesheading "We may be negatively impacted by the recently passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or by any future changes in tax laws."
During 2016, we recorded an income tax benefit of $1.3 million. Income tax differed from taxes at the statutory rates primarily due to the domestic manufacturing deduction, offset by non-deductible compensation and state income taxes.
During 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit of $4.6 million. Income tax differed from taxes at the statutory rates primarily due to the non-deductible acquisition-related transaction costs.
During 2014, we recorded an income tax benefit of $3.3 million. Income taxes did not differ materially from taxes at the statutory rate.
At December 31, 2016,2017, we had gross temporary differences representing future tax deductions of $716.1$684.1 million, which represented deferred tax assets primarily comprised of $504.0$520.3 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards. We have applied a valuation allowance against the net operating loss carryforwards and certain other deferred tax assets. If in the future, we determine that any additional portion of the deferred tax assets is more likely than not to be realized, we will record a benefit to the income statement. We currently estimate that approximately $273.8 million and $144.6 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire in 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
| | | (In thousands) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 | | Change | | 2014 | 2017 | | Change | | 2016 | | Change | | 2015 |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | (63,121 | ) | | $ | (35,773 | ) | | $ | (27,348 | ) | | $ | 2,655 |
| | $ | (30,003 | ) | $ | — |
| | $ | 63,121 |
| | $ | (63,121 | ) | | $ | (35,773 | ) | | $ | (27,348 | ) |
On October 14, 2015, we announced our Strategic Transformation, which included plans to divest the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses. Our results of operations reflect the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Amounts in discontinued operations include previously unallocated depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, income taxes, and other corporate expenses that were attributable to the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses. We completed both divestitures in 2016:
On November 17, 2016, we closed on an agreement with YFC, under which YFC acquired the E-Commerce business for $40.5 million, which included a working capital adjustment. As a result, we recognized a $52.2 million loss on sale of discontinued operations.
On August 9, 2016, we closed on an agreement with OpenMail, under which OpenMail acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain specified liabilities of the Search and Content business for $45.2 million, which included a working capital adjustment. As a result, we recognized a $21.6 million loss on sale of discontinued operations.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, we recorded goodwill impairments of $15.1 million and $33.8 million related to the Search and Content and E-Commerce reporting units, respectively, and trade name impairments of $5.9 million and $4.2 million related to the HSW and Monoprice trade names, respectively.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, we recorded a goodwill impairment of $59.4 million related to the E-Commerce reporting unit and a trade name impairment of $3.2 million related to the Monoprice trade name.
See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information on discontinued operations.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Adjusted EBITDA: We define Adjusted EBITDA differently for this report than we have defined itas net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc., determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding the past, due to: (i)effects of stock-based compensation, depreciation, amortization of acquired intangible assets (including acquired technology), restructuring, other loss, net, the impact of noncontrolling interests, income tax expense (benefit), the effects of discontinued operations, acquisition-related costs relatedand CEO separation-related costs. Restructuring costs relate to the upcoming move of our corporate headquarters, which was announced in the fourth quarter of 2016, (ii) the impact of noncontrolling interests from the HD Vest acquisition that we began recognizing in the first quarter of 2016, (iii) the discontinued operations treatment of our Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses as determined in the fourth quarter of 2015, (iv) separation-related costs in connection with the departure of our former chief executive officer which was announced in the fourth quarter of 2015, and (v) acquisition-related costs in connection with the HD Vest and SimpleTax acquisitions that we would not have otherwise incurred as part of our business operations.2016. Acquisition-related costs include professional services fees and other direct transaction costs and changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities related to acquired companies. The HD VestSimpleTax acquisition closedthat was completed in the fourth quarter of 2015 and resulted in
significant transaction costs. The SimpleTax acquisition included contingent consideration, for which the fair value of that liability was revalued in the second quarter of 2016. We define Adjusted EBITDA as operating income (loss), determinedFor further detail, see "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP, excluding the effectsPart II Item 8 of depreciation, amortization of acquired intangible assets (including acquired technology), stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, CEO separation-related costs, and restructuring costs.this report.
We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance. We use this non-GAAP financial measure for internal management and compensation purposes, when publicly providing guidance on possible future results, and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is a common measure used by investors and analysts to evaluate our performance, that it provides a more complete understanding of the results of operations and trends affecting our business when viewed together with GAAP results, and that management and investors benefit from referring to this non-GAAP financial measure. Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business and, therefore, Adjusted EBITDA should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, GAAP net loss.income (loss). Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently and, therefore, our Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of our Adjusted EBITDA to operatingnet income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc., which we believe to be the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented below:
| | | (In thousands) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 | 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| Operating income (loss) | $ | 37,117 |
| | $ | (4,807 | ) | | $ | 4,603 |
| |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | $ | 27,039 |
| | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation | 14,128 |
| | 8,694 |
| | 8,694 |
| 11,653 |
| | 14,128 |
| | 8,694 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization of acquired intangible assets | 38,688 |
| | 22,590 |
| | 22,164 |
| 38,139 |
| | 38,688 |
| | 22,590 |
|
| Restructuring | | 3,101 |
| | 3,870 |
| | — |
|
| Other loss, net | | 44,551 |
| | 39,781 |
| | 12,542 |
|
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 2,337 |
| | 658 |
| | — |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | (25,890 | ) | | (1,285 | ) | | (4,623 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | — |
| | 63,121 |
| | 27,348 |
|
| Acquisition-related costs | 391 |
| | 10,988 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 391 |
| | 10,988 |
|
| CEO separation-related costs | — |
| | 1,769 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | 1,769 |
|
| Restructuring | 3,870 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 94,194 |
| | $ | 39,234 |
| | $ | 35,461 |
| $ | 100,930 |
| | $ | 94,194 |
| | $ | 39,234 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
The increase in Adjusted EBITDA primarily was due to increases in segment operating income of $4.6 million and $6.0 million related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation segments, respectively. Offsetting the increase in Adjusted
EBITDA was a $3.9 million increase in corporate operating expenses not allocated to the segments primarily related to costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation, which related to the relocation cost of our corporate headquarters, and costs associated with transitioning of roles such as overlap in staffing and recruiting search fees.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
The increase in Adjusted EBITDA primarily was due to increases in segment operating income of $46.3 million and $9.9 million related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation segments, respectively. Offsetting the increase in Adjusted EBITDA was a $1.2 million increase in corporate operating expenses not allocated to the segments primarily related to costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation, which mainly consisted of recruiting fees.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
The increase in Adjusted EBITDA primarily was due to an increase in segment operating income of $7.3 million related to our Tax Preparation segment, offset by a $3.5 million increase in corporate operating expenses not allocated to the segments primarily related to an increase in personnel expenses (mainly due to higher average headcount to support operations).
Non-GAAP net income:We define non-GAAP net income differently for this report than we have defined it in the past, due to: (i) restructuring costs related to the upcoming move of our corporate headquarters which was announced in the fourth quarter of 2016, (ii) the impact of noncontrolling interests from the HD Vest acquisition that we began recognizing in the first quarter of 2016, (iii) the discontinued operations treatment of our Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses(loss) as determined in the fourth quarter of 2015, (iv) separation-related costs in connection with the departure of our former chief executive officer which was announced in the fourth quarter of 2015, and (v) acquisition-related costs in connection with the HD Vest and SimpleTax acquisitions that we would not have otherwise incurred as part of our business operations. Acquisition-related costs are described further under Adjusted EBITDA above. For this report, we define non-GAAP net income as net loss(loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc., determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding the effects of discontinued operations, stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets (including acquired technology), accretion of debt discount and accelerated accretion of debt discount on the Convertible Senior Notes, gain on Convertible Seniorthe Notes repurchased, write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on closedthe Notes that were redeemed and the terminated TaxAct 2013- HD Vest 2015 credit facility, acquisition-related costs CEO separation-related(described further under Adjusted EBITDA above), restructuring costs restructuring costs,(described further under Adjusted EBITDA above), the impact of noncontrolling interests, the related cash tax impact of those adjustments, and non-cash income taxes. The write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on the terminated Notes and the closed TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility relates to the debt refinancing that occurred in the second quarter of 2017. We exclude the non-cash portion of income taxes because of our ability to offset a substantial portion of our cash tax liabilities by using deferred tax assets, which primarily consist of U.S. federal net operating losses. The majority of these net operating losses will expire, if unutilized, between 2020 and 2024.
We believe that non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP net income (loss) per share provide meaningful supplemental information to management, investors, and analysts regarding our performance and the valuation of our business by excluding items in the statement of operations that we do not consider part of our ongoing operations or have not been, or are not expected to be, settled in cash. Additionally, we believe that non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP net income (loss) per share are common measures used by investors and analysts to evaluate our performance and the valuation of our business. Non-GAAP net income (loss) should be evaluated in light of our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP and should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, GAAP net loss.income (loss). Other companies may calculate non-GAAP net income differently, and, therefore, our non-GAAP net income may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP net income to net lossincome attributable to Blucora, Inc., which we believe to be the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Net loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 63,121 |
| | 27,348 |
| | 30,003 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 14,128 |
| | 8,694 |
| | 8,694 |
|
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 34,143 |
| | 20,303 |
| | 20,192 |
|
| Accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 3,666 |
| | 3,866 |
| | 3,594 |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 1,628 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Gain on Convertible Senior Notes repurchased | (7,724 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of debt issuance costs on closed TaxAct 2013 credit facility | — |
| | 398 |
| | — |
|
| Acquisition-related costs | 391 |
| | 10,988 |
| | — |
|
| CEO separation-related costs | — |
| | 1,769 |
| | — |
|
| Restructuring | 3,870 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Impact of noncontrolling interests | 658 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash tax impact of adjustments to GAAP net income | 175 |
| | (236 | ) | | (151 | ) |
| Non-cash income tax benefit | (3,802 | ) | | (4,857 | ) | | (3,459 | ) |
| Non-GAAP net income | $ | 45,096 |
| | $ | 28,199 |
| | $ | 23,326 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Per diluted share: | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. (1) | $ | (1.53 | ) | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.83 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 1.48 |
| | 0.66 |
| | 0.70 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 0.33 |
| | 0.21 |
| | 0.20 |
|
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 0.80 |
| | 0.49 |
| | 0.47 |
|
| Accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 0.09 |
| | 0.09 |
| | 0.08 |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 0.04 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Gain on Convertible Senior Notes repurchased | (0.18 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of debt issuance costs on closed TaxAct 2013 credit facility | — |
| | 0.01 |
| | — |
|
| Acquisition-related costs | 0.01 |
| | 0.26 |
| | — |
|
| CEO separation-related costs | — |
| | 0.04 |
| | — |
|
| Restructuring | 0.09 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Impact of noncontrolling interests | 0.02 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash tax impact of adjustments to GAAP net income | 0.00 |
| | (0.01 | ) | | (0.00 | ) |
| Non-cash income tax benefit | (0.09 | ) | | (0.12 | ) | | (0.08 | ) |
| Non-GAAP net income | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.54 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing per diluted share amounts | 42,686 |
| | 41,861 |
| | 42,946 |
|
(1) Any difference in "per diluted share" between this table and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income is due to using different weighted average shares outstanding in the event that there is GAAP net loss but non-GAAP net income and vice versa. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | $ | 27,039 |
| | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | — |
| | 63,121 |
| | 27,348 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 11,653 |
| | 14,128 |
| | 8,694 |
|
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 34,002 |
| | 34,143 |
| | 20,303 |
|
| Accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 1,567 |
| | 3,666 |
| | 3,866 |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | — |
| | 1,628 |
| | — |
|
| Gain on the Notes repurchased | — |
| | (7,724 | ) | | — |
|
| Write-off of debt issuance costs on closed TaxAct 2013 credit facility | — |
| | — |
| | 398 |
|
| Write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on terminated Convertible Senior Notes | 6,715 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on closed TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility | 9,593 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquisition-related costs | — |
| | 391 |
| | 10,988 |
|
| CEO separation-related costs | — |
| | — |
| | 1,769 |
|
| Restructuring | 3,101 |
| | 3,870 |
| | — |
|
| Impact of noncontrolling interests | 2,337 |
| | 658 |
| | — |
|
| Cash tax impact of adjustments to GAAP net income | (6 | ) | | 175 |
| | (236 | ) |
| Non-cash income tax benefit | (26,853 | ) | | (3,802 | ) | | (4,857 | ) |
| Non-GAAP net income | $ | 69,148 |
| | $ | 45,096 |
| | $ | 28,199 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Per diluted share: | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. (1) | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (1.53 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | — |
| | 1.48 |
| | 0.68 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 0.25 |
| | 0.33 |
| | 0.21 |
|
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 0.72 |
| | 0.80 |
| | 0.50 |
|
| Accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 0.03 |
| | 0.09 |
| | 0.09 |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | — |
| | 0.04 |
| | — |
|
| Gain on Convertible Senior Notes repurchased | — |
| | (0.18 | ) | | — |
|
| Write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on terminated Convertible Senior Notes | 0.14 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on closed TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility | 0.20 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquisition-related costs | — |
| | 0.01 |
| | 0.27 |
|
| CEO separation-related costs | — |
| | — |
| | 0.04 |
|
| Restructuring | 0.07 |
| | 0.09 |
| | — |
|
| Impact of noncontrolling interests | 0.05 |
| | 0.02 |
| | — |
|
| Cash tax impact of adjustments to GAAP net income | 0.00 |
| | 0.00 |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Non-cash income tax benefit | (0.57 | ) | | (0.09 | ) | | (0.12 | ) |
| Non-GAAP net income | $ | 1.46 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing per diluted share amounts | 47,211 |
| | 42,686 |
| | 40,959 |
|
(1) Any difference in "per diluted share" between this table and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income is due to using different weighted average shares outstanding in the event that there is GAAP net loss but non-GAAP net income and vice versa. |
Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with year ended December 31, 2016
The increase in non-GAAP net income primarily was due to increases in segment operating income of $4.6 million and $6.0 million related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation segments, respectively. The increase in non-GAAP net income was also due to (i) a $12.6 million decrease in interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs, and accretion of debt discounts, mainly related to the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, which was entered into in December 2015 and terminated in the second quarter of 2017, (ii) a $3.0 million loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense, mainly related to the prepayment of a portion of the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility in 2016, (iii) a $0.4 million decrease in depreciation expense, mainly related to depreciation expense on HD Vest fixed assets, and (iv) a $1.4 million decrease in cash income tax expense, mainly related to the addition of HD Vest. These increases were offset by a $3.9 million increase in corporate operating expenses not allocated to the segments primarily related to costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation, which related to the relocation cost of our corporate headquarters, and costs associated with transitioning of roles such as overlap in staffing and recruiting search fees.
Year ended December 31, 2016 compared with year ended December 31, 2015
The increase in non-GAAP net income primarily was due to increases in segment operating income of $46.3$4.6 million and $9.9$6.0 million related to our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation segments, respectively. This was offset by (i) a $25.1$12.6 million increasedecrease in interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs, and accretion of debt discounts, mainly related to the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, which was entered into in December 2015, (ii) a $7.1$3.0 million loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense, mainly related to the prepayment of a portion of the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility in 2016, (iii) a $2.3$0.4 million increasedecrease in depreciation expense, mainly related to depreciation expense on HD Vest fixed assets, (iv) a $1.9$1.4 million increasedecrease in cash income tax expense, mainly related to the addition of HD Vest, (v) a $1.2$3.9 million increase in corporate operating expenses not allocated to the segments primarily related to costs incurred as part of our Strategic Transformation, which mainly consisted of recruiting fees, and (vi) a $1.0$0.1 million decrease in gain on third party bankruptcy settlement.
Year ended December 31, 2015 compared with year ended December 31, 2014
The increase in non-GAAP net income primarily was due to an increase in segment operating income of $7.3 million related to our Tax Preparation segment, offset by a $3.5 million increase in corporate operating expenses not allocated to the segments primarily related to an increase in personnel expenses (mainly due to higher average headcount to support operations).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
Our principal source of liquidity is our cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments.equivalents. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had cash and marketable investments of $58.8 million, consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $51.7 million and available-for-sale investments of $7.1$60.0 million. Our HD Vest broker-dealer subsidiary operates in a highly regulated industry and is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have substantial monetary and non-monetary impacts to HD Vest's operations. As of December 31, 2016,2017, HD Vest met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
We generally invest our excess cash in high quality marketable investments. These investments generally include debt instruments issued by the U.S. federal government and its agencies, international governments, municipalities and publicly-held corporations, as well as commercial paper, insured time deposits with commercial banks, and money market funds invested in securities issued by agencies of the U.S., although specific holdings can vary from period to period depending upon our cash requirements. Our financial instrument investments held at December 31, 20162017 had minimal default risk and short-term maturities.
We have financed our operations primarily from cash provided by operating activities. Accordingly, we believe that the cash generated from our operations and the cash and cash equivalents we have on hand will be sufficient to meet our operating, working capital, regulatory capital requirements at our broker-dealer subsidiary, and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, the underlying levels of revenues and expenses that we project may not prove to be accurate. For further discussion of the risks to our business related to liquidity, see the paragraph in our Risk Factors (Part I Item 1A of this report) under the heading "Existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operations may not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for servicing debt, working capital, and capital expenditures.expenditures."
Use of Cash
We may use our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments balance in the future on investment in our current businesses, for repayment of debt, for returning capital to shareholders, or for acquiring companies or assets that complement our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses.businesses, or for returning capital to shareholders.
On May 22, 2017, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders in order to (a) refinance the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, (b) redeem our Notes that were outstanding at the time, and (c) provide a term loan and revolving line of credit for future working capital, capital expenditure and general business purposes. Consequently, the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility was repaid in full and the commitments thereunder were terminated. The Blucora senior secured credit facilities in the aggregate committed amount of $425.0 million consist of a committed $50.0 million revolving credit facility (including a letter of credit sub-facility), and a $375.0 million term loan facility. The final maturity dates of the revolving credit loan and term loan are May 22, 2022 and May 22, 2024, respectively. Obligations under the Blucora senior secured credit facility are guaranteed by certain of Blucora's subsidiaries and secured by the assets of Blucora and those subsidiaries.
The credit facility includes financial and operating covenants with respect to certain ratios, including a net leverage ratio, which are defined further in the credit facility agreement. We were in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2017. We initially borrowed $375.0 million under the term loan and have made prepayments of $30.0 million towards the term loan. We have not borrowed any amounts under the revolving credit loan and do not have any other debt outstanding. For further detail, see "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Related to the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, we had repayment activity of $64.0 million and $140.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Related to the Notes, we repurchased $28.4 million of the Notes for cash of $20.7 million during 2016. For further detail, see "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
On July 2, 2015, TaxAct acquired SimpleTax, which included additional consideration of up to C$4.6 million (with C$ indicating Canadian dollars and amounting to approximately $3.7 million based on the acquisition-date exchange rate). The related payments are contingent upon product availability and revenue performance over a three-year period and are expected to occur annually over that period. The first payment was made in the first quarter of 2017, and the remaining payments of $2.7 million are expected through 2019. For further detail, see "Note 7: Fair Value Measurements" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
On October 14, 2015, we announced our Strategic Transformation, which refers to our transformation into a technology-enabled financial solutions company comprised of TaxAct and HD Vest, the divestitures of our Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses, and the relocation of corporate headquarters from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. See the "Strategic Transformation" subsection above for additional detail regarding the related use of cash.
Related to the acquisition of HD Vest, we paid $612.3$613.7 million (including the final(after a $1.8 million working capital adjustment in the first quarter of 2016) in cash, which was funded by a combination of cash on hand and the new TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility. The credit facility consistsconsisted of a $25.0 million revolving credit loan and a $400.0 million term loan for an aggregate $425.0 million credit facility. The final maturity dates of the revolving credit loan and term loan arewere December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The interest rates on the revolving credit loan and term loan arewere variable. The credit facility includes financial and operating covenants with respect to certain ratios, including a net leverage to EBITDA ratio, which are defined further in the agreement. We were in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2016.2017. TaxAct and HD Vest initially borrowed $400.0 million under the term loan and had repayment activity of $140.0$260.0 million in 2016.2017. For further detail, see "Note 3: Business Combinations" and "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
On August 30, 2013, TaxAct entered into an agreement to refinance a 2012 credit facility on more favorable terms. TaxAct had net repayment activity of $51.9 million and $19.4 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.2015. This credit facility was repaid in full in the second quarter of 2015 and subsequently closed.
On March 15, 2013,In the third quarter of 2018 we issued $201.25 million principal amountexpect to commence our new clearing services relationship with Fidelity Clearing & Custody Solutions, pursuant to the agreement we executed during 2017. We expect the new clearing relationship to provide tangible benefits to our advisors and customers in the form of 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”). The Notes mature April 1, 2019, unless earlier purchased, redeemed, or converted in accordance with their terms. During 2016, we repurchased $28.4improved technology, product offerings and service. We currently expect that this relationship will generate between approximately $60.0 and $100.0 million of incremental Wealth Management segment income over the Notes' principal for cash of $20.7 million. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.25% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears beginning on October 1, 2013. There are no financial or operating covenants relating toten years following the Notes. As of May 2013, we are permitted to settle conversions in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, at our election. We expect to have the liquidity to satisfy conversion of the Notes' principal for cash based upon cash on hand, net cash flows from operations, and cash available through the credit facility. We intend to satisfy any conversion premium by issuing shares of our common stock. For further detail, see "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8commencement of this report.
Our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program whereby we could purchase our common stockrelationship in open-market transactions. The repurchase period concluded in May 2016. Repurchased shares were retired and resumed the status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock. We had the following open-market share purchase activity, exclusive of purchase and administrative costs:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except per share data) | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Cost |
| Year ended December 31, 2016 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2015 | 551 |
| | $ | 14.01 |
| | $ | 7,713 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2014 | 2,289 |
| | $ | 16.85 |
| | $ | 38,558 |
|
For further detail, see "Note 11: Stockholders' Equity" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
On July 2, 2015, TaxACT acquired SimpleTax for C$2.4 million (with C$ indicating Canadian dollars and amounting to approximately $1.9 million based on the acquisition-date exchange rate) in cash and additional consideration of up to C$4.6 million ($3.7 million) that is contingent upon product availability and revenue performance over a three-year period.late 2018.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Our contractual obligations and commitments are as follows for years ending December 31:
| | | (In thousands) | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | Thereafter | | Total | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Operating lease commitments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating lease obligations | $ | 3,948 |
| | $ | 4,028 |
| | $ | 4,108 |
| | $ | 3,797 |
| | $ | 2,441 |
| | $ | 3,657 |
| | $ | 21,979 |
| $ | 4,201 |
| | $ | 4,281 |
| | $ | 3,946 |
| | $ | 2,493 |
| | $ | 1,979 |
| | $ | 1,678 |
| | $ | 18,578 |
|
| Sublease income | (770 | ) | | (793 | ) | | (815 | ) | | (624 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,002 | ) | (1,265 | ) | | (1,288 | ) | | (991 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,544 | ) |
| Net operating lease commitments | 3,178 |
| | 3,235 |
| | 3,293 |
| | 3,173 |
| | 2,441 |
| | 3,657 |
| | 18,977 |
| 2,936 |
| | 2,993 |
| | 2,955 |
| | 2,493 |
| | 1,979 |
| | 1,678 |
| | 15,034 |
|
| Purchase commitments | 3,174 |
| | 2,703 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,877 |
| 5,528 |
| | 3,600 |
| | 3,600 |
| | 2,100 |
| | 600 |
| | 3,400 |
| | 18,828 |
|
| Debt commitments | 2,560 |
| | 640 |
| | 172,859 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 260,000 |
| | 436,059 |
| — |
| | 2,000 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 332,500 |
| | 345,000 |
|
| Interest on Notes | 7,347 |
| | 7,347 |
| | 3,673 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,367 |
| |
| Interest payable | | 15,172 |
| | 15,157 |
| | 15,068 |
| | 14,872 |
| | 14,719 |
| | 20,584 |
| | 95,572 |
|
| Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability | 872 |
| | 1,129 |
| | 1,420 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,421 |
| 1,304 |
| | 1,385 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,689 |
|
| Total | $ | 17,131 |
| | $ | 15,054 |
| | $ | 181,245 |
| | $ | 3,173 |
| | $ | 2,441 |
| | $ | 263,657 |
| | $ | 482,701 |
| $ | 24,940 |
| | $ | 25,135 |
| | $ | 25,123 |
| | $ | 22,965 |
| | $ | 20,798 |
| | $ | 358,162 |
| | $ | 477,123 |
|
For further detail see "Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The above table does not reflect unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $4.5$4.2 million, the timing of which is uncertain. For additional discussion on unrecognized tax benefits see "Note 15:16: Income Taxes" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Cash Flows
Our cash flows were comprised of the following:
| | | (In thousands) | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations | $ | 71,215 |
| | $ | 16,341 |
| | $ | 20,128 |
| $ | 72,846 |
| | $ | 85,970 |
| | $ | 24,308 |
|
| Net cash used by investing activities from continuing operations | (1,560 | ) | | (336,024 | ) | | (54,003 | ) | |
| Net cash provided (used) by investing activities from continuing operations | | 2,053 |
| | (1,560 | ) | | (332,517 | ) |
| Net cash provided (used) by financing activities from continuing operations | (146,044 | ) | | 328,619 |
| | (46,465 | ) | (68,562 | ) | | (162,001 | ) | | 320,652 |
|
| Net cash provided (used) by continuing operations | (76,389 | ) | | 8,936 |
| | (80,340 | ) | 6,337 |
| | (77,591 | ) | | 12,443 |
|
| Net cash provided by discontinued operations | 72,655 |
| | 4,586 |
| | 2,359 |
| 1,028 |
| | 72,655 |
| | 4,586 |
|
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (26 | ) | | (17 | ) | | — |
| 78 |
| | (26 | ) | | (17 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (3,760 | ) | | $ | 13,505 |
| | $ | (77,981 | ) | $ | 7,443 |
| | $ | (4,962 | ) | | $ | 17,012 |
|
Net cash from the operating activities of continuing operations: Net cash from the operating activities of continuing operations consists of lossincome (loss) from continuing operations, offset by certain non-cash adjustments, and changes in our working capital.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $71.2$72.8 million, $16.3$86.0 million, and $20.1$24.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively. The activity in 20162017 included a $46.0$(15.3) million working capital contribution and approximately $25.2$88.1 million of income from continuing operations (offset by non-cash adjustments). The working capital contribution was driven by accrued expenses, including accrued interest, and the expected realization (through 2022) of $10.9 million of repealed corporate AMT credit carryovers, and restructuring activities.
The activity in 2016 included an $44.8 million working capital contribution and approximately $41.2 million of non-cash adjustments and a loss from continuing operations. The working capital contribution continued to be driven by accrued expenses and the impact of excess tax benefits from stock-based activity primarily due to utilizing equity net operating loss carryforwards from prior years. In addition, we had placed into escrow $20.0 million of additional consideration that was contingent upon HD Vest's 2015 earnings performance, and that amount was returned to us in the first quarter of 2016 since it was not achieved (see "Note"Note 3: Business Combinations"Combinations" of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for additional information). Lastly, the timing of TaxAct's spending on marketing campaigns for the upcoming tax season and the addition of HD Vest provided further working capital contribution during the period.
The activity in 2015 included ana $11.2 million working capital contribution and approximately $5.2$13.1 million of non-cash adjustments and a loss from continuing operations. The working capital contribution was driven by accrued expenses and the impact of excess tax benefits from stock-based activity, and also included separation-related costs accrued in connection with the upcoming departure of our chief executive officer.
The activityofficer that occurred in 2014 included a $2.6 million working capital contribution and approximately $17.6 million of non-cash adjustments and a loss from continuing operations. The working capital contribution was driven by accrued expenses and the impact of excess tax benefits from stock-based activity, offset by increased prepaid expense balances related to the timing of TaxAct's spending on marketing campaigns for the related tax season.2016.
Net cash from the investing activities of continuing operations: Net cash from the investing activities of continuing operations primarily consists of cash outlays for business acquisitions, transactions (purchases of and proceeds from sales and maturities) related to our investments, and purchases of property and equipment. Our investing activities tend to fluctuate from period to period primarily based upon the level of acquisition activity.
Net cash used by investing activities was $2.1 million, $1.6 million, $336.0 million, and $54.0$332.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The activity in 2017 primarily consisted of net cash inflows on our available-for-sale investments of $7.1 million offset by approximately offset by $5.0 million in purchases of property and 2014, respectively.equipment. The activity in 2016 primarily consisted of $3.8 million in purchases of property and equipment and payment of the $1.8 million final working capital adjustment on the HD Vest acquisition, offset by net cash inflows on our available-for-sale investments of $4.0 million. The activity in 2015 primarily consisted of the acquisitions of HD Vest and SimpleTax for a combined $573.4 million and $1.5 million in purchases of property and equipment, offset by net cash inflows on our available-for-sale investments of $238.7 million. The activity in 2014 primarily consisted of net cash outlays on our available-for-sale investments of $52.0 million and $2.0 million in purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash from the financing activities of continuing operations: Net cash from the financing activities of continuing operations primarily consists of transactions related to the issuance of debt and stock. Our financing activities tend to fluctuate from period to periodperiod-to-period based upon our financing needs due to the level of acquisition activity and market conditions that present favorable financing opportunities.
Net cash used by financing activities was $146.0$68.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The activity in 2017 primarily consisted of payments of $290.0 million in connection with the termination of the TaxAct - HD Vest credit facility, $172.8 million for redemption in full of the outstanding Notes, $9.1 million in tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards, payment of $3.2 million on the note payable with related party, and $0.9 million in contingent consideration paid related to the 2015 acquisition of SimpleTax. These cash outflows were offset by approximately $365.8 million in proceeds from the Blucora senior secured credit facility that was entered into in May 2017 and $41.7 million in combined proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to stock option exercises and the employee stock purchase plan.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $162.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The activity in 2016 primarily consisted of payments of $140.0 million on the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, the $20.7 million repurchase of the Notes, payment of $3.2 million on the note payable with related party, and $1.8 million in tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards. These cash outflows were offset by approximately $16.0 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based award activity primarily due to utilizing equity net operating loss carryforwards from prior years and $3.6 million in combined proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to stock option exercises and the employee stock purchase plan.
Net cash providedused by financing activities was $328.6$320.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The activity in 2015 primarily consisted of $378.3 million in proceeds from the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility that was entered into on December 31, 2015, $8.0 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based activity primarily due to utilizing equity net operating loss carryforwards from prior years, and $3.6 million in combined proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to stock option exercises and the employee stock purchase plan. These cash inflows were offset by payments of $51.9 million on the TaxAct 2013 credit facility, stock repurchases of $7.7 million, and $1.5 million in tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards
Net cash used by financing activities was $46.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The activity in 2014 primarily consisted of payments of $56.0 million on the TaxAct 2013 credit facility, stock repurchases of $38.7 million, and $2.9 million in tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards. These cash outflows were offset by approximately $36.6 million in proceeds from the TaxAct 2013 credit facility, $8.1 million in combined proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to stock option exercises and the employee stock purchase plan, and $6.4 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based activity primarily due to utilizing equity net operating loss carryforwards from prior years.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the disclosures included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and disclosure of contingencies. In some cases, we could have reasonably used different accounting policies and estimates.
The SEC has defined a company’s most critical accounting policies as the ones that are the most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the estimates used. We base our estimates on historical experience, current conditions, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and, based on information available to us at that time, we make judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources as well as identify and assess our accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments, or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We also have other accounting policies that involve the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results. For additional information, see "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Wealth management revenue recognition: Wealth management revenue consists primarily of commission revenue, advisory revenue, asset-based revenue, and transaction and fee revenue. Revenue is recognized in the periods in which the related services are performed, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Payments received in advance of the performance of service are deferred and recognized as revenue when earned. Of Wealth management revenues, commissions revenue contains subjective judgments and the use of estimates.
We consider the nature of our contractual arrangements in determining whether to recognize certain types of wealth management revenue, primarily commission revenue and advisory revenue, on the basis of the gross amount billed or net amount retained after payments are made to providers of certain services related to the product or service offering. The main factors that we use to determine whether to record revenue on a gross or net basis are whether:
we are primarily responsible for the service to the financial advisor and their client;
we have discretion in establishing fees paid by the client and fees due to the third-party service provider; and
we are involved in the determination of product or service specifications.
When client fees include a portion of charges that are paid to another party and we are primarily responsible for providing the service to the client, revenue is recognized on a gross basis in an amount equal to the fee paid by the client. The cost of revenue recognized is the amount due to the other party. In instances in which another party is primarily responsible for providing the service to the client, we recognize revenue based on the net amount that we retain. The portion of the fees that we collect from the client and remit to the other party are considered pass-through amounts and are not a component of revenue or cost of revenue.
Further details of wealth management revenue are as follows:
Commission revenue - Commissions represent amounts generated by HD Vest's financial advisors for their clients' purchases and sales of securities and various investment products. We generate two types of commissions: transaction-based sales commissions that occur at the point of sale, as well as trailing commissions for which we provide ongoing account support to clients of our financial advisors.
We record transaction-basedTransaction-based sales commission revenue is recorded on a trade-date basis, which is when our performance obligations in generating the commissions have been substantially completed. Trailing commission revenue is based on a percentage of the current market value of clients' investment holdings in trail-eligible assets and recognized over the period during which services are performed. Since trailing commission revenue is generally paid in arrears, we estimate it based on a number of factors, including market levels and the amount of trailing commission revenues received in prior periods.
periods, and also considers historical payout ratios. These estimates are primarily based on historical information and there is not significant judgment involved.
A substantial portion of commission revenue is ultimately paid to financial advisors. We record an estimate for transaction-based commissions payable based upon the payout rate of the financial advisor generating the accrued commission revenue. We record an estimate for trailing commissions payable based upon historical payout ratios. Such amounts are recorded as "Commissions and advisory fees payable" on the consolidated balance sheets and "Wealth management services cost of revenue" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Advisory revenue - Advisory revenue includes fees charged to clients in advisory accounts where HD Vest is the RIA. These fees are based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts. A substantial portion of these advisory fees are paid to the related financial advisor and these payments are classified as "Wealth management services cost of revenue" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Asset-based revenue - Asset-based revenue primarily includes fees from financial product manufacturer sponsorship programs and cash sweep programs and are recognized ratably over the period in which services are provided.
Transaction and fee revenue - We charge fees for executing certain transactions in client accounts. Transaction-related charges are recognized on a trade-date basis. Other fees relate to services provided and other account charges as generally outlined in agreements with financial advisors, clients, and financial institutions. Such fees are recognized as services are performed or as earned, as applicable.
Tax preparation revenue recognition: We derive revenue from the sale of tax preparation online services, ancillary services, packaged tax preparation software, and multiple element arrangements that may include a combination of these items. Ancillary services include tax preparation support services, data archive services, e-filing services, bank or reloadable pre-paid debit card services, and other value-added services. This revenue is recorded in the Tax Preparation segment.
Our Tax Preparation segment revenue consists primarily of hosted tax preparation online services,include tax preparation support services, data archive services and e-filing services. We recognize revenue from these services as the services are performed and the four revenue recognition criteria as described in "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report are met.
We recognizeThe Company recognizes revenue from the sale of ourits packaged software when legal title transfers. This is generally when ourits customers download the software from the Internet or, to a lesser extent, when the software ships. Of Tax Preparation revenues, revenues from bank or reloadable prepaid debit card services, and software and/or services that consist of multiple elements contain subjective judgments and the use of estimates.
The bank or reloadable prepaid debit card services are offered to taxpayers as an option to receive their tax refunds in the form of a prepaid bank card or to have the fees for the software and/or services purchased by the customers deducted from their refunds. Other value-added service revenue consists of revenue from revenue sharing and royalty arrangements with third party partners. Revenue for these transactions is recognized when the four revenue recognition criteria described above are met; for some arrangements that is upon filing and for other arrangements that is upon our determination of when collectibility is probable.
For software and/or services that consist of multiple elements, we must: (1) determine whether and when each element has been delivered; (2) determine the fair value of each element using the selling price hierarchy of vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”) of fair value if VSOE is not available, and estimated selling price (“ESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available; and (3) allocate the total price among the various elements based on the relative selling price method. Once we have allocated the total price among the various elements, we recognize revenue when the revenue recognition criteria described above are met for each element.
VSOE generally exists when we sell the deliverable separately. When VSOE cannot be established, we attempt to establish a selling price for each element based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use ESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. ESP is the estimated price at which we would sell the software or service if it were sold on a stand-alone basis. We determine ESP for the software or service by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, historical stand-alone sales, pricing practices, market conditions, competitive landscape, internal costs, and gross margin objectives.
In some situations, we receive advance payments from our customers. We defer However, the impact of multiple element arrangements are not material and primarily impact the timing of revenue associated with these advance payments and recognize the consideration for each element when we ship the software or perform the services, as appropriate. Payments related to data archive services are deferred and recognizedrecognition over the related contractual term.
Cost of revenue: We recordtax filing season, which is concentrated within the cost of revenue for sales of services when the related revenue is recognized. "Cost of revenue" consists of costs related to the Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, which include commissions to financial advisors, third-party costs, and costs associated with the technical support team and the operation of its data centers. Data center costs include personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, professional services fees (which include technology project consulting fees), software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting costs, and depreciation. Cost of revenue also includes the amortization of acquired technology.
Stock-based compensation: We measure stock-based compensation at the grant date based on the fair valuefirst two quarters of the award and recognize it as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting or service period, as applicable, of the stock award using the straight-line method. We recognize stock-based compensation over the vesting period for each separately vesting portion of a share-based award as if they were individual share-based awards. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Calculating stock-based compensation relies upon certain assumptions, including the expected term of the stock-based awards, expected stock price volatility, expected interest rate, number and types of stock-based awards, and the pre-vesting forfeiture rate. If we use different assumptions due to changes in our business or other factors, our stock-based compensation could vary materially in the future.filing period.
Income taxes: We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards, and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities. We periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and reduce the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of the deferred tax assets, including expectations of future taxable income, recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, and other relevant factors. There is a wide range of possible judgments relating to the valuation of our deferred tax assets.
We record liabilities to address uncertain tax positions that have been taken in previously filed tax returns or that are expected to be taken in a future tax return. The determination for required liabilities is based upon an analysis of each individual tax position, taking into consideration whether it is more likely than not that the tax position, based on technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. The tax benefit to be recognized in the financial statements from such a position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The difference between the amount recognized and the total tax position is recorded as a liability. The ultimate resolution of these tax positions may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded.
For additional information about the realization of our deferred tax assets and our valuation allowance, see "Note 15:16: Income Taxes" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report. For additional information about our net operating loss carryforwards, see the Risk Factor "If there is a change in our ownership within the meaningOur utilization of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards (“(“NOLs”) may be severely limited or potentially eliminated.eliminated" in Part I Item 1A of this report. For additional information about expectations of future taxable income, see the Risk Factor "Our financial results may fluctuate, which could cause our stock price to be volatile or decline." in Part I Item 1A of this report.
Business combinations and intangible assets including goodwill: We account for business combinations using the acquisition method. The acquisition-date fair value of total consideration includes cash and contingent consideration. Since we are contractually obligated to pay contingent consideration upon the achievement of specified objectives, a contingent consideration liability is recorded at the acquisition date and is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because we value the liability utilizing significant inputs not observable in the market. Specifically, we have determined the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis, which includes assumptions related to estimating revenues, the probability of payment, and the discount rate. We review our assumptions related to the fair value of the contingent consideration liability each reporting period and, if there are material changes, revalue the contingent consideration liability based on the revised assumptions, until such contingency is satisfied through payment upon the achievement of the specific objectives. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability is recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the period in which the fair value changes. If we use different assumptions due to changes in our business or other factors, the fair value of the contingent consideration liability could vary materially in the future.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the acquisition-date fair value of total consideration over the acquisition-date fair value of net assets, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets, and is assigned to reporting units that are
expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination as of the acquisition date. Reporting units are consistent with reportable segments and included the former Search and Content and E-Commerce segments. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives on a straight-line basis, except for advisor relationships which are amortized proportional to expected revenue. Acquisition-related costs, including advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other similar costs, are expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. The results of operations of acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date.
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment: We evaluate goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, as of November 30, or more frequently when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. As part of the impairment evaluation, we may elect to perform an assessment of qualitative factors. If this qualitative assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit (for goodwill) or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value, or if we elect to bypass the qualitative assessment, we then would proceed with the quantitative impairment test.
The goodwill quantitative impairment test is a two-step process that first compares the carrying values of reporting units to their fair values. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of impairment. This second step determines the current fair values of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and then compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
The indefinite-lived intangible asset quantitative impairment test compares the carrying value of the intangible asset to its fair value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
Fair value typically is estimated using the present value of future discounted cash flows, an income approach. The significant estimates in the discounted cash flow model include the weighted-average cost of capital, long-term rates of revenue growth and/or profitability of our businesses, and working capital effects. The weighted-average cost of capital considers the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to each business's ability to achieve the projected cash flows. To validate the reasonableness of the reporting unit fair values, we reconcile the aggregate fair values of our reporting units to the aggregate market value of our common stock on the date of valuation, while considering a reasonable acquisition premium. These estimates and the resulting valuations require significant judgment.
Definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of pre-tax undiscounted future cash flows, using our best estimates of future net sales and operating expenses, expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or group of assets over the remaining economic life of the primary asset in the asset group. We measure the amount of the impairment as the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value.
In 2016, we performed qualitative assessments for our Wealth Management and Tax Preparation reporting units as of November 30. We sold our Search and Content and E-Commerce reporting units in 2016.
In 2015, we performed quantitative assessments for our Search and Content and E-Commerce reporting units as of October 31, due to the October announcement of our plans to divest these businesses, and performed a qualitative assessment for our Tax Preparation reporting unit as of November 30. In 2014, we performed quantitative assessments for each of our reporting units as of November 30. As a result of these assessments, we recorded goodwill impairments of $15.1 million and $33.8 million related to the Search and Content and E-Commerce reporting units, respectively, and trade name impairments of $5.9 million and $4.2 million related to the HSW and Monoprice trade names, respectively, all in the fourth quarter of 2015. We also recorded a goodwill impairment of $59.4 million related to the E-Commerce reporting unit and a trade name impairment of $3.2 million related to the Monoprice trade name, all in the fourth quarter of 2014. Impairments for both periods were recorded in discontinued operations. We also determined that the impairments related to the Search and Content and E-Commerce reporting units were indicators requiring the review of Search and Content and E-Commerce long-lived assets for recoverability. The results of this review indicated that their carrying values were recoverable.
A deterioration in the assumptions used in determining fair value or in other unforeseen events--such as market disruptions and deterioration of the macroeconomic environment or internal challenges related to reorganizations, employee and management turnover, and other trends--could have material negative impacts on our estimates and the resulting valuations, which could lead to a decision to impair goodwill and/or intangible assets in future periods.
For additional information about our goodwill and intangible assets, see "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" and "Note 6: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Debt issuance costs and debt discounts: Debt issuance costs and debt discounts are deferred and amortized as interest expense under the effective interest method over the contractual term of the related debt, adjusted for prepayments in the case of our credit facilities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
The following table presents a summary of our unaudited consolidated results of operations for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2016.2017. The information for each of these quarters has been prepared on a basis consistent with our annual audited consolidated financial statements. You should read this information in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part II Item 8. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
| | | | March 31, 2015 | | June 30, 2015 | | September 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2015 | | March 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2016 | March 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2016 | | March 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2017 |
| | (In thousands except per share data and percentages) (1) | (In thousands except per share data and percentages) (1) |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 77,291 |
| | $ | 76,117 |
| | $ | 80,088 |
| | $ | 83,050 |
| $ | 77,291 |
| | $ | 76,117 |
| | $ | 80,088 |
| | $ | 83,050 |
| | $ | 82,667 |
| | $ | 85,296 |
| | $ | 86,809 |
| | $ | 93,848 |
|
| Tax preparation services revenue | 81,068 |
| | 30,900 |
| | 2,875 |
| | 2,865 |
| | 88,474 |
| | 43,991 |
| | 3,149 |
| | 3,751 |
| 88,474 |
| | 43,991 |
| | 3,149 |
| | 3,751 |
| | 99,708 |
| | 53,866 |
| | 3,362 |
| | 4,001 |
|
| Total revenue | 81,068 |
| | 30,900 |
|
| 2,875 |
|
| 2,865 |
|
| 165,765 |
|
| 120,108 |
|
| 83,237 |
|
| 86,801 |
| 165,765 |
| | 120,108 |
|
| 83,237 |
|
| 86,801 |
|
| 182,375 |
|
| 139,162 |
|
| 90,171 |
|
| 97,849 |
|
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services cost of revenue | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 52,269 |
| | 51,023 |
| | 54,921 |
| | 55,783 |
| 52,269 |
| | 51,023 |
| | 54,921 |
| | 55,783 |
| | 55,874 |
| | 56,963 |
| | 59,607 |
| | 63,415 |
|
| Tax preparation services cost of revenue | 2,137 |
| | 1,373 |
| | 1,170 |
| | 1,487 |
| | 3,207 |
| | 2,023 |
| | 1,319 |
| | 1,819 |
| 3,207 |
| | 2,023 |
| | 1,319 |
| | 1,819 |
| | 3,818 |
| | 2,411 |
| | 1,314 |
| | 2,475 |
|
| Amortization of acquired technology | 1,862 |
| | 1,863 |
| | 1,911 |
| | 1,910 |
| | 667 |
| | 49 |
| | 49 |
| | 47 |
| 667 |
| | 49 |
| | 49 |
| | 47 |
| | 48 |
| | 47 |
| | 50 |
| | 50 |
|
| Total cost of revenue | 3,999 |
| | 3,236 |
|
| 3,081 |
|
| 3,397 |
|
| 56,143 |
|
| 53,095 |
|
| 56,289 |
|
| 57,649 |
| 56,143 |
| | 53,095 |
|
| 56,289 |
|
| 57,649 |
|
| 59,740 |
|
| 59,421 |
|
| 60,971 |
|
| 65,940 |
|
| Engineering and technology | 1,090 |
| | 1,130 |
| | 1,251 |
| | 1,636 |
| | 4,295 |
| | 3,959 |
| | 4,588 |
| | 4,938 |
| 4,295 |
| | 3,959 |
| | 4,588 |
| | 4,938 |
| | 4,748 |
| | 4,242 |
| | 5,051 |
| | 5,573 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 33,018 |
| | 7,693 |
| | 2,113 |
| | 3,030 |
| | 43,837 |
| | 19,913 |
| | 11,965 |
| | 13,645 |
| 43,837 |
| | 19,913 |
| | 11,965 |
| | 13,645 |
| | 48,998 |
| | 22,296 |
| | 13,680 |
| | 17,824 |
|
| General and administrative | 7,146 |
| | 7,653 |
| | 8,895 |
| | 19,869 |
| | 12,753 |
| | 11,508 |
| | 11,638 |
| | 11,497 |
| 12,753 |
| | 11,508 |
| | 11,638 |
| | 11,497 |
| | 13,483 |
| | 13,715 |
| | 12,207 |
| | 13,263 |
|
| Depreciation | 351 |
| | 356 |
| | 394 |
| | 420 |
| | 975 |
| | 963 |
| | 968 |
| | 975 |
| 975 |
| | 963 |
| | 968 |
| | 975 |
| | 940 |
| | 873 |
| | 867 |
| | 780 |
|
| Amortization of other acquired intangible assets | 3,186 |
| | 3,185 |
| | 3,195 |
| | 3,191 |
| | 8,316 |
| | 8,316 |
| | 8,297 |
| | 8,402 |
| 8,316 |
| | 8,316 |
| | 8,297 |
| | 8,402 |
| | 8,288 |
| | 8,289 |
| | 8,615 |
| | 8,615 |
|
Restructuring (2) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,870 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,870 |
| | 2,289 |
| | 331 |
| | 106 |
| | 375 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 48,790 |
| | 23,253 |
|
| 18,929 |
|
| 31,543 |
|
| 126,319 |
|
| 97,754 |
|
| 93,745 |
|
| 100,976 |
| 126,319 |
| | 97,754 |
|
| 93,745 |
|
| 100,976 |
|
| 138,486 |
|
| 109,167 |
|
| 101,497 |
|
| 112,370 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 32,278 |
| | 7,647 |
|
| (16,054 | ) |
| (28,678 | ) |
| 39,446 |
|
| 22,354 |
|
| (10,508 | ) |
| (14,175 | ) | 39,446 |
| | 22,354 |
|
| (10,508 | ) |
| (14,175 | ) |
| 43,889 |
|
| 29,995 |
|
| (11,326 | ) |
| (14,521 | ) |
| Other loss, net | (2,995 | ) | | (3,034 | ) | | (3,080 | ) | | (3,433 | ) | | (7,514 | ) | | (10,916 | ) | | (11,453 | ) | | (9,898 | ) | (7,514 | ) | | (10,916 | ) | | (11,453 | ) | | (9,898 | ) | | (9,708 | ) | | (24,200 | ) | | (5,241 | ) | | (5,402 | ) |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 29,283 |
| | 4,613 |
|
| (19,134 | ) |
| (32,111 | ) |
| 31,932 |
|
| 11,438 |
|
| (21,961 | ) |
| (24,073 | ) | 31,932 |
| | 11,438 |
|
| (21,961 | ) |
| (24,073 | ) |
| 34,181 |
|
| 5,795 |
|
| (16,567 | ) |
| (19,923 | ) |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | (9,868 | ) | | (2,202 | ) | | 6,926 |
| | 9,767 |
| | (11,643 | ) | | (5,793 | ) | | 8,537 |
| | 10,184 |
| (11,643 | ) | | (5,793 | ) | | 8,537 |
| | 10,184 |
| | (3,471 | ) | | (2,315 | ) | | (166 | ) | | 31,842 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 19,415 |
| | 2,411 |
| | (12,208 | ) | | (22,344 | ) | | 20,289 |
| | 5,645 |
| | (13,424 | ) | | (13,889 | ) | 20,289 |
| | 5,645 |
| | (13,424 | ) | | (13,889 | ) | | 30,710 |
| | 3,480 |
| | (16,733 | ) | | 11,919 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes (3) | 3,685 |
| | 1,840 |
| | 1,597 |
| | (34,470 | ) | | 2,522 |
| | (19,975 | ) | | (40,528 | ) | | (5,140 | ) | 2,522 |
| | (19,975 | ) | | (40,528 | ) | | (5,140 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net income (loss) | 23,100 |
| | 4,251 |
|
| (10,611 | ) |
| (56,814 | ) |
| 22,811 |
|
| (14,330 | ) |
| (53,952 | ) |
| (19,029 | ) | 22,811 |
| | (14,330 | ) |
| (53,952 | ) |
| (19,029 | ) |
| 30,710 |
|
| 3,480 |
|
| (16,733 | ) |
| 11,919 |
|
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (144 | ) | | (115 | ) | | (167 | ) | | (232 | ) | (144 | ) | | (115 | ) | | (167 | ) | | (232 | ) | | (126 | ) | | (176 | ) | | (164 | ) | | (1,871 | ) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | $ | 23,100 |
| | $ | 4,251 |
| | $ | (10,611 | ) | | $ | (56,814 | ) | | $ | 22,667 |
| | $ | (14,445 | ) | | $ | (54,119 | ) | | $ | (19,261 | ) | $ | 22,667 |
| | $ | (14,445 | ) | | $ | (54,119 | ) | | $ | (19,261 | ) | | $ | 30,584 |
| | $ | 3,304 |
| | $ | (16,897 | ) | | $ | 10,048 |
|
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.47 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.30 | ) | | $ | (0.55 | ) | | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | 0.22 |
|
| Discontinued operations | 0.09 |
| | 0.04 |
| | 0.04 |
| | (0.84 | ) | | 0.06 |
| | (0.48 | ) | | (0.97 | ) | | (0.12 | ) | 0.06 |
| | (0.48 | ) | | (0.97 | ) | | (0.12 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Basic net loss per share | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | (0.26 | ) | | $ | (1.39 | ) | | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | (1.30 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) | |
| Basic net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | (1.30 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) | | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | 0.22 |
|
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.30 | ) | | $ | (0.55 | ) | | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | 0.21 |
|
| Discontinued operations | 0.09 |
| | 0.04 |
| | 0.04 |
| | (0.84 | ) | | 0.06 |
| | (0.47 | ) | | (0.97 | ) | | (0.12 | ) | 0.06 |
| | (0.47 | ) | | (0.97 | ) | | (0.12 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Diluted net loss per share | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | (0.26 | ) | | $ | (1.39 | ) | | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | (1.30 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) | |
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | (1.30 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) | | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.37 | ) | | $ | 0.21 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 40,987 |
| | 40,918 |
| | 40,950 |
| | 40,979 |
| | 41,171 |
| | 41,405 |
| | 41,635 |
| | 41,766 |
| 41,171 |
| | 41,405 |
| | 41,635 |
| | 41,766 |
| | 42,145 |
| | 43,644 |
| | 45,459 |
| | 46,231 |
|
| Diluted | 41,899 |
| | 41,936 |
| | 40,950 |
| | 40,979 |
| | 41,610 |
| | 42,298 |
| | 41,635 |
| | 41,766 |
| 41,610 |
| | 42,298 |
| | 41,635 |
| | 41,766 |
| | 45,428 |
| | 46,937 |
| | 45,459 |
| | 48,406 |
|
| | | | March 31, 2015 | | June 30, 2015 | | September 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2015 | | March 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2016 | March 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2016 | | March 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services revenue | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 46.6 | % | | 63.4 | % | | 96.2 | % | | 95.7 | % | 46.6 | % | | 63.4 | % | | 96.2 | % | | 95.7 | % | | 45.3 | % | | 61.3 | % | | 96.3 | % | | 95.9 | % |
| Tax preparation services revenue | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 53.4 |
| | 36.6 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 4.3 |
| 53.4 |
| | 36.6 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 54.7 |
| | 38.7 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 4.1 |
|
| Total revenue | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
|
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue (4): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services cost of revenue | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 67.6 |
| | 67.0 |
| | 68.6 |
| | 67.2 |
| 67.6 |
| | 67.0 |
| | 68.6 |
| | 67.2 |
| | 67.6 |
| | 66.8 |
| | 68.7 |
| | 67.6 |
|
| Tax preparation services cost of revenue | 2.6 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 40.7 |
| | 51.9 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 4.6 |
| | 41.9 |
| | 48.5 |
| 3.6 |
| | 4.6 |
| | 41.9 |
| | 48.5 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 4.5 |
| | 39.1 |
| | 61.9 |
|
| Amortization of acquired technology | 2.3 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 66.5 |
| | 66.7 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| 0.4 |
| | 0.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.0 |
| | 0.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Total cost of revenue | 4.9 |
| | 10.4 |
| | 107.2 |
| | 118.6 |
| | 33.9 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 67.6 |
| | 66.4 |
| 33.9 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 67.6 |
| | 66.4 |
| | 32.8 |
| | 42.7 |
| | 67.6 |
| | 67.4 |
|
| Engineering and technology | 1.3 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 43.5 |
| | 57.1 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 5.7 |
| 2.6 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 40.7 |
| | 24.9 |
| | 73.5 |
| | 105.8 |
| | 26.4 |
| | 16.6 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 15.7 |
| 26.4 |
| | 16.6 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 15.7 |
| | 26.9 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 15.2 |
| | 18.2 |
|
| General and administrative | 8.8 |
| | 24.8 |
| | 309.4 |
| | 693.5 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 14.0 |
| | 13.2 |
| 7.7 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 14.0 |
| | 13.2 |
| | 7.4 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 13.5 |
| | 13.6 |
|
| Depreciation | 0.4 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 13.7 |
| | 14.7 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 1.1 |
| 0.6 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| Amortization of other acquired intangible assets | 3.9 |
| | 10.3 |
| | 111.1 |
| | 111.4 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 10.0 |
| | 9.7 |
| 5.0 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 10.0 |
| | 9.7 |
| | 4.5 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 8.8 |
|
| Restructuring | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.5 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.5 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 60.0 |
| | 75.3 |
| | 658.4 |
| | 1,101.1 |
| | 76.2 |
| | 81.4 |
| | 112.7 |
| | 116.3 |
| 76.2 |
| | 81.4 |
| | 112.7 |
| | 116.3 |
| | 76.0 |
| | 78.4 |
| | 112.6 |
| | 114.9 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 40.0 |
| | 24.7 |
| | (558.4 | ) | | (1,001.1 | ) | | 23.8 |
| | 18.6 |
| | (12.7 | ) | | (16.3 | ) | 23.8 |
| | 18.6 |
| | (12.7 | ) | | (16.3 | ) | | 24.0 |
| | 21.6 |
| | (12.6 | ) | | (14.9 | ) |
| Other loss, net | (3.7 | ) | | (9.8 | ) | | (107.1 | ) | | (119.8 | ) | | (4.5 | ) | | (9.1 | ) | | (13.8 | ) | | (11.4 | ) | (4.5 | ) | | (9.1 | ) | | (13.8 | ) | | (11.4 | ) | | (5.3 | ) | | (17.4 | ) | | (5.8 | ) | | (5.5 | ) |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 36.3 |
| | 14.9 |
| | (665.5 | ) | | (1,120.9 | ) | | 19.3 |
| | 9.5 |
| | (26.5 | ) | | (27.7 | ) | 19.3 |
| | 9.5 |
| | (26.5 | ) | | (27.7 | ) | | 18.7 |
| | 4.2 |
| | (18.4 | ) | | (20.4 | ) |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | (12.2 | ) | | (7.1 | ) | | 240.9 |
| | 340.9 |
| | (7.0 | ) | | (4.8 | ) | | 10.3 |
| | 11.7 |
| (7.0 | ) | | (4.8 | ) | | 10.3 |
| | 11.7 |
| | (1.9 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | 32.5 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 24.1 |
| | 7.8 |
| | (424.6 | ) | | (780.0 | ) | | 12.3 |
| | 4.7 |
| | (16.2 | ) | | (16.0 | ) | 12.3 |
| | 4.7 |
| | (16.2 | ) | | (16.0 | ) | | 16.8 |
| | 2.5 |
| | (18.6 | ) | | 12.1 |
|
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 4.5 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 55.5 |
| | (1,203.1 | ) | | 1.5 |
| | (16.6 | ) | | (48.7 | ) | | (5.9 | ) | 1.5 |
| | (16.6 | ) | | (48.7 | ) | | (5.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net income (loss) | 28.6 |
| | 13.8 |
| | (369.1 | ) | | (1,983.1 | ) | | 13.8 |
| | (11.9 | ) | | (64.9 | ) | | (21.9 | ) | 13.8 |
| | (11.9 | ) | | (64.9 | ) | | (21.9 | ) | | 16.8 |
| | 2.5 |
| | (18.6 | ) | | 12.1 |
|
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (1.9 | ) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | 28.6 | % | | 13.8 | % | | (369.1 | )% | | (1,983.1 | )% | | 13.7 | % | | (12.0 | )% | | (65.1 | )% | | (22.2 | )% | 13.7 | % | | (12.0 | )% | | (65.1 | )% | | (22.2 | )% | | 16.7 | % | | 2.4 | % | | (18.8 | )% | | 10.2 | % |
| |
(1) | On December 31, 2015, we acquired HD Vest. See "Note 3: Business Combinations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report. |
| |
(2) | On October 27, 2016, we announced plans to relocate our corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. In connection with this plan, we incurred restructuring costs. See "Note 5: Restructuring" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for more information. |
| |
(3) | We sold the Search and Content business and the E-Commerce business on August 9, 2016 and November 17, 2016, respectively. See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report for more information. |
| |
(4) | "Wealth management services cost of revenue" and "Tax preparation services cost of revenue" are calculated based on their respective revenue bases of "Wealth management services revenue" and "Tax Preparation services revenue," respectively. "Total cost of revenue" is calculated based on "Total revenue." |
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in the market values of our marketable debt securities and interest rates.
Financial market risk: We do not invest in financial instruments or their derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. By policy, we limit our credit exposure to any one issuer, other than securities issued by the U.S. federal government and its agencies, and do not have any derivative instruments in our investment portfolio. The three primary goals that guide our investment decisions, with the first being the most important, are: preserve capital, maintain ease of conversion into immediate liquidity, and achieve a rate of return over a pre-determined benchmark. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we principally invest in marketable fixed-rate debt securities. Fixed-rate debt securities generally include debt instruments issued by the U.S. federal government and its agencies, international governments, municipalities and publicly-held corporations, as well as commercial paper, insured time deposits with commercial banks, and money market funds invested in securities issued by agencies of the U.S., with minimal default risk and maturity dates of less than one year from the end of any of our quarterly accounting periods.fund securities. We consider the market value, default, and liquidity risks of our investments to be low at December 31, 2016.2017.
Interest rate risk: As of December 31, 2016, all of the debt securities that we held were fixed-rate earning instruments that carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed-rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates. We may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2016,2017, our cash equivalent balance of $10.1$10.9 million was held in U.S. government securities, money market funds, commercial paper, and taxable municipal bonds, and our short-term investment balance of $7.1 million was held in U.S. government securities, commercial paper, time deposits, and taxable municipal bonds.funds. We consider the interest rate risk for our cash equivalent and fixed-rate debt securities held at December 31, 20162017 to be low. For further detail on our cash equivalents, and fixed-rate debt securities, see "Note 7: Fair Value Measurements" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report.
In addition, as of December 31, 2016,2017, we have $260.0$345.0 million of debt outstanding under the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015Blucora senior secured credit facility,facilities, which carries a degree of interest rate risk. This debt has a floating portion of its interest rate tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). For further information on our outstanding debt, see "Note 9: Debt" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II Item 8 of this report. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in LIBOR on December 31, 20162017 would result in a $12.2$22.0 million increase in our interest expense until the scheduled maturity date in 2022.2024.
The following table provides information about our cash equivalent and fixed-rate debt securities as of December 31, 2016,2017, including principal cash flows for 20172018 and thereafter and the related weighted average interest rates. The change in fair values during 2016 was less than $0.1 million2017 for our cash equivalent and fixed-rate debt securities was not material and was recorded in other comprehensive income. Principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected year of maturity are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except percentages) | 2017 |
| Thereafter |
| Total |
| Fair Value |
| U.S. government securities | $ | 4,750 |
| | 0.49 | % | | $ | — |
| | — | % | | $ | 4,750 |
| | 0.49 | % | | $ | 4,749 |
|
| Money market and other funds | 4,090 |
| | 0.52 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | 4,090 |
| | 0.52 | % | | 4,090 |
|
| Commercial paper | 4,000 |
| | 0.70 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | 4,000 |
| | 0.70 | % | | 3,997 |
|
| Time deposits | 807 |
| | 0.58 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | 807 |
| | 0.58 | % | | 807 |
|
| Taxable municipal bonds | 3,585 |
| | 0.70 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | 3,585 |
| | 0.70 | % | | 3,597 |
|
| Cash equivalents and marketable fixed-rate debt securities | $ | 17,232 |
| | | | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 17,232 |
| | | | $ | 17,240 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except percentages) | 2018 |
| Thereafter |
| Total |
| Fair Value |
| Money market and other funds | 10,857 |
| | 1.00 | % | | — |
| | — | % | | 10,857 |
| | 1.00 | % | | 10,857 |
|
| Cash equivalents | $ | 10,857 |
| | | | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 10,857 |
| | | | $ | 10,857 |
|
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Blucora, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Blucora, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015, and2016, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Blucora, Inc.the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Blucora, Inc.’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ ERNSTErnst & YOUNGYoung LLP
Seattle, WashingtonWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.
February 28, 2017Dallas, Texas
March 1, 2018
BLUCORA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| Current assets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 51,713 |
| | $ | 55,473 |
| $ | 59,965 |
| | $ | 51,713 |
|
| Cash segregated under federal or other regulations | 2,355 |
| | 3,557 |
| 1,371 |
| | 2,355 |
|
| Available-for-sale investments | 7,101 |
| | 11,301 |
| — |
| | 7,101 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance | 10,209 |
| | 7,884 |
| 10,694 |
| | 10,209 |
|
| Commissions receivable | 16,144 |
| | 16,328 |
| 16,822 |
| | 16,144 |
|
| Other receivables | 4,004 |
| | 24,407 |
| 3,180 |
| | 4,004 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net | 6,321 |
| | 10,062 |
| 7,365 |
| | 6,321 |
|
| Current assets of discontinued operations | — |
| | 211,663 |
| |
| Total current assets | 97,847 |
| | 340,675 |
| 99,397 |
| | 97,847 |
|
| Long-term assets: | | | | | | |
| Property and equipment, net | 10,836 |
| | 11,308 |
| 9,831 |
| | 10,836 |
|
| Goodwill, net | 548,741 |
| | 548,959 |
| 549,037 |
| | 548,741 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | 362,178 |
| | 396,295 |
| 328,205 |
| | 362,178 |
|
| Other long-term assets | 3,057 |
| | 2,311 |
| 15,201 |
| | 3,057 |
|
| Total long-term assets | 924,812 |
| | 958,873 |
| 902,274 |
| | 924,812 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 1,022,659 |
| | $ | 1,299,548 |
| $ | 1,001,671 |
| | $ | 1,022,659 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 4,689 |
| $ | 4,413 |
| | $ | 4,536 |
|
| Commissions and advisory fees payable | 16,587 |
| | 16,982 |
| 17,813 |
| | 16,587 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 18,528 |
| | 13,006 |
| 19,577 |
| | 18,528 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 12,156 |
| | 11,521 |
| 9,953 |
| | 12,156 |
|
| Current portion of long-term debt, net | 2,560 |
| | 31,631 |
| — |
| | 2,560 |
|
| Current liabilities of discontinued operations | — |
| | 88,275 |
| |
| Total current liabilities | 54,367 |
| | 166,104 |
| 51,756 |
| | 54,367 |
|
| Long-term liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt, net | 248,221 |
| | 353,850 |
| 338,081 |
| | 248,221 |
|
| Convertible senior notes, net | 164,176 |
| | 185,918 |
| — |
| | 164,176 |
|
| Deferred tax liability, net | 111,126 |
| | 103,520 |
| 43,433 |
| | 111,126 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 1,849 |
| | 1,902 |
| 804 |
| | 1,849 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 10,205 |
| | 10,932 |
| 8,177 |
| | 10,205 |
|
| Total long-term liabilities | 535,577 |
| | 656,122 |
| 390,495 |
| | 535,577 |
|
| Total liabilities | 589,944 |
| | 822,226 |
| 442,251 |
| | 589,944 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests | 15,696 |
| | 15,038 |
| 18,033 |
| | 15,696 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
| |
|
| |
|
| Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
| Common stock, par $0.0001—authorized shares, 900,000; issued and outstanding shares, | | | | | | |
| 41,845 and 40,954 | 4 |
| | 4 |
| |
| 46,366 and 41,845 | | 5 |
| | 4 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,510,152 |
| | 1,490,405 |
| 1,555,560 |
| | 1,510,152 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (1,092,756 | ) | | (1,027,598 | ) | (1,014,174 | ) | | (1,092,756 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (381 | ) | | (527 | ) | (4 | ) | | (381 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 417,019 |
| | 462,284 |
| 541,387 |
| | 417,019 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,022,659 |
| | $ | 1,299,548 |
| $ | 1,001,671 |
| | $ | 1,022,659 |
|
BLUCORA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except per share data)
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services revenue | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 348,620 |
| | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Tax preparation services revenue | 139,365 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
| 160,937 |
| | 139,365 |
| | 117,708 |
|
| Total revenue | 455,911 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
| 509,557 |
| | 455,911 |
| | 117,708 |
|
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wealth management services cost of revenue | 213,996 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 235,859 |
| | 213,996 |
| | — |
|
| Tax preparation services cost of revenue | 8,368 |
| | 6,167 |
| | 5,880 |
| 10,018 |
| | 8,368 |
| | 6,167 |
|
| Amortization of acquired technology | 812 |
| | 7,546 |
| | 7,450 |
| 195 |
| | 812 |
| | 7,546 |
|
| Total cost of revenue | 223,176 |
| | 13,713 |
| | 13,330 |
| 246,072 |
| | 223,176 |
| | 13,713 |
|
| Engineering and technology | 17,780 |
| | 5,107 |
| | 3,758 |
| 19,614 |
| | 17,780 |
| | 5,107 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 89,360 |
| | 45,854 |
| | 42,671 |
| 102,798 |
| | 89,360 |
| | 45,854 |
|
| General and administrative | 47,396 |
| | 43,563 |
| | 25,315 |
| 52,668 |
| | 47,396 |
| | 43,563 |
|
| Depreciation | 3,881 |
| | 1,521 |
| | 1,300 |
| 3,460 |
| | 3,881 |
| | 1,521 |
|
| Amortization of other acquired intangible assets | 33,331 |
| | 12,757 |
| | 12,742 |
| 33,807 |
| | 33,331 |
| | 12,757 |
|
| Restructuring | 3,870 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 3,101 |
| | 3,870 |
| | — |
|
| Total operating expenses | 418,794 |
| | 122,515 |
| | 99,116 |
| 461,520 |
| | 418,794 |
| | 122,515 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 37,117 |
| | (4,807 | ) | | 4,603 |
| 48,037 |
| | 37,117 |
| | (4,807 | ) |
| Other loss, net | (39,781 | ) | | (12,542 | ) | | (13,489 | ) | (44,551 | ) | | (39,781 | ) | | (12,542 | ) |
| Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | (2,664 | ) | | (17,349 | ) | | (8,886 | ) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | 3,486 |
| | (2,664 | ) | | (17,349 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | 1,285 |
| | 4,623 |
| | 3,342 |
| 25,890 |
| | 1,285 |
| | 4,623 |
|
| Loss from continuing operations | (1,379 | ) | | (12,726 | ) | | (5,544 | ) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | | 29,376 |
| | (1,379 | ) | | (12,726 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) | | (30,003 | ) | — |
| | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) |
| Net loss | (64,500 | ) | | (40,074 | ) | | (35,547 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) | | 29,376 |
| | (64,500 | ) | | (40,074 | ) |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (2,337 | ) | | (658 | ) | | — |
|
| Net loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) | |
| Net loss per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | $ | 27,039 |
| | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | — |
| | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) |
| Basic net loss per share | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | |
| Net loss per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | |
| Basic net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) |
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | — |
| | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) |
| Diluted net loss per share | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | |
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) |
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| 44,370 |
| | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
|
| Diluted | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| 47,211 |
| | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (64,500 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 29,376 |
| | $ | (64,500 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net of tax | 9 |
| | (236 | ) | | (1,119 | ) | 1 |
| | 9 |
| | (236 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 137 |
| | (517 | ) | | — |
| 376 |
| | 137 |
| | (517 | ) |
| Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of tax, included in net income as Other loss, net | — |
| | 375 |
| | 6 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 375 |
|
| Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment loss on available-for-sale investments, included in net income as discontinued operations | — |
| | 964 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | 964 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 146 |
| | 586 |
| | (1,113 | ) | |
| Comprehensive loss | (64,354 | ) | | (39,488 | ) | | (36,660 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income | | 377 |
| | 146 |
| | 586 |
|
| Comprehensive income (loss) | | 29,753 |
| | (64,354 | ) | | (39,488 | ) |
| Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (2,337 | ) | | (658 | ) | | — |
|
| Comprehensive loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. | $ | (65,012 | ) | | $ | (39,488 | ) | | $ | (36,660 | ) | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | $ | 27,416 |
| | $ | (65,012 | ) | | $ | (39,488 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
BLUCORA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
| | | | Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests | | | | Additional- paid-in capital | | Accumulated deficit | | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests | | | | Additional- paid-in capital | | Accumulated deficit | | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | |
| | Common stock | | | Common stock | | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Total | Shares | | Amount | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | — |
| | 42,083 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 1,466,043 |
| | $ | (951,977 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 514,070 |
| |
| Common stock issued for stock options and restricted stock units | — |
| | 1,003 |
| | — |
| | 6,715 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,715 |
| |
| Common stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 85 |
| | — |
| | 1,376 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,376 |
| |
| Stock repurchases | — |
| | (2,289 | ) | | — |
| | (38,650 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (38,650 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,113 | ) | | (1,113 | ) | |
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,990 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,990 |
| |
| Tax effect of equity compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22,962 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22,962 |
| |
| Tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,778 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,778 | ) | |
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (35,547 | ) | | — |
| | (35,547 | ) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | — |
| | 40,882 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,467,658 |
| | (987,524 | ) | | (1,113 | ) | | 479,025 |
| $ | — |
| | 40,882 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 1,467,658 |
| | $ | (987,524 | ) | | $ | (1,113 | ) | | $ | 479,025 |
|
| Common stock issued for stock options and restricted stock units | — |
| | 520 |
| | — |
| | 2,409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,409 |
| — |
| | 520 |
| | — |
| | 2,409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,409 |
|
| Common stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 103 |
| | — |
| | 1,193 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,193 |
| — |
| | 103 |
| | — |
| | 1,193 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,193 |
|
| Stock repurchases | — |
| | (551 | ) | | — |
| | (7,735 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (7,735 | ) | — |
| | (551 | ) | | — |
| | (7,735 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (7,735 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 586 |
| | 586 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 586 |
| | 586 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,047 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,047 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,047 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,047 |
|
| Tax effect of equity compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,378 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,378 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,378 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,378 |
|
| Tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,545 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,545 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,545 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,545 | ) |
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (40,074 | ) | | — |
| | (40,074 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (40,074 | ) | | — |
| | (40,074 | ) |
| Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interests | 15,038 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Purchase of redeemable non-controlling interests | | 15,038 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 15,038 |
| | 40,954 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,490,405 |
| | (1,027,598 | ) | | (527 | ) | | 462,284 |
| 15,038 |
| | 40,954 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,490,405 |
| | (1,027,598 | ) | | (527 | ) | | 462,284 |
|
| Common stock issued for stock options and restricted stock units | — |
| | 700 |
| | — |
| | 2,216 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,216 |
| — |
| | 700 |
| | — |
| | 2,216 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,216 |
|
| Common stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 191 |
| | — |
| | 1,402 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,402 |
| — |
| | 191 |
| | — |
| | 1,402 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,402 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 146 |
| | 146 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 146 |
| | 146 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,235 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,235 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,235 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,235 |
|
| Tax effect of equity compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,461 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,461 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,461 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,461 |
|
| Tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,752 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,752 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,752 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,752 | ) |
| Reclassification of liability award to equity award | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 185 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 185 |
| |
| Reclassification of equity award to liability award | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 185 |
| | — |
| | | | 185 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 658 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (65,158 | ) | | — |
| | (65,158 | ) | 658 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (65,158 | ) | | — |
| | (65,158 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 15,696 |
| | 41,845 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 1,510,152 |
| | $ | (1,092,756 | ) | | $ | (381 | ) | | $ | 417,019 |
| 15,696 |
| | 41,845 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,510,152 |
| | (1,092,756 | ) | | (381 | ) | | 417,019 |
|
| Common stock issued for stock options and restricted stock units | | — |
| | 4,382 |
| | 1 |
| | 40,271 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,272 |
|
| Common stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | | — |
| | 139 |
| | — |
| | 1,429 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,429 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 377 |
| | 377 |
|
| Stock-based compensation and impact of recent ASU | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,801 |
| | 51,543 |
| | — |
| | 64,344 |
|
| Tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9,095 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (9,095 | ) |
| Other | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
| Net income | | 2,337 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 27,039 |
| | — |
| | 27,039 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | 18,033 |
| | 46,366 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 1,555,560 |
| | $ | (1,014,174 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | 541,387 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
BLUCORA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (64,500 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 29,376 |
| | $ | (64,500 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
| Less: Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) | | (30,003 | ) | — |
| | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) |
| Net loss from continuing operations | (1,379 | ) | | (12,726 | ) | | (5,544 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash from operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | 29,376 |
| | (1,379 | ) | | (12,726 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash from operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Stock-based compensation | 13,764 |
| | 8,694 |
| | 8,694 |
| 11,653 |
| | 14,128 |
| | 8,694 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization of acquired intangible assets | 38,688 |
| | 22,590 |
| | 22,164 |
| 38,139 |
| | 38,688 |
| | 22,590 |
|
| Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activity | (15,957 | ) | | (7,967 | ) | | (6,398 | ) | |
| Restructuring (non-cash) | | 1,569 |
| | (364 | ) | | — |
|
| Deferred income taxes | (18,055 | ) | | (12,607 | ) | | (9,858 | ) | (16,159 | ) | | (18,055 | ) | | (12,607 | ) |
| Amortization of premium on investments, net | 174 |
| | 1,589 |
| | 3,772 |
| 10 |
| | 174 |
| | 1,589 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 1,840 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 1,059 |
| 1,089 |
| | 1,840 |
| | 1,133 |
|
| Accretion of debt discounts | 4,690 |
| | 3,866 |
| | 3,594 |
| 1,947 |
| | 4,690 |
| | 3,866 |
|
| Loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense | 1,036 |
| | 398 |
| | — |
| 20,445 |
| | 1,036 |
| | 398 |
|
| Revaluation of acquisition-related contingent consideration liability | 391 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 391 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 19 |
| | 203 |
| | 77 |
| 30 |
| | 19 |
| | 203 |
|
| Cash provided (used) by changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash segregated under federal or other regulations | 1,202 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Accounts receivable | (2,340 | ) | | (1,862 | ) | | 47 |
| (483 | ) | | (2,340 | ) | | (1,862 | ) |
| Commissions receivable | 184 |
| | — |
| | — |
| (678 | ) | | 184 |
| | — |
|
| Other receivables | 22,875 |
| | 651 |
| | 367 |
| (204 | ) | | 22,875 |
| | 651 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 3,741 |
| | (493 | ) | | (3,457 | ) | (869 | ) | | 3,741 |
| | (493 | ) |
| Other long-term assets | (887 | ) | | (15 | ) | | 191 |
| (12,281 | ) | | (887 | ) | | (15 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (153 | ) | | 369 |
| | (258 | ) | (123 | ) | | (153 | ) | | 369 |
|
| Commissions and advisory fees payable | (395 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| 1,226 |
| | (395 | ) | | — |
|
| Deferred revenue | 582 |
| | 1,875 |
| | 1,130 |
| (3,248 | ) | | 582 |
| | 1,875 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other current and long-term liabilities | 21,195 |
| | 10,643 |
| | 4,548 |
| 1,407 |
| | 21,195 |
| | 10,643 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations | 71,215 |
| | 16,341 |
| | 20,128 |
| 72,846 |
| | 85,970 |
| | 24,308 |
|
| Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (1,788 | ) | | (573,366 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | (1,788 | ) | | (569,709 | ) |
| Purchases of property and equipment | (3,812 | ) | | (1,512 | ) | | (2,037 | ) | (5,039 | ) | | (3,812 | ) | | (1,512 | ) |
| Change in restricted cash | — |
| | 150 |
| | — |
| |
| Proceeds from sales of investments | — |
| | 156,506 |
| | 28,535 |
| 249 |
| | — |
| | 156,506 |
|
| Proceeds from maturities of investments | 12,807 |
| | 296,455 |
| | 255,994 |
| 7,252 |
| | 12,807 |
| | 296,455 |
|
| Purchases of investments | (8,767 | ) | | (214,257 | ) | | (336,495 | ) | (409 | ) | | (8,767 | ) | | (214,257 | ) |
| Net cash used by investing activities from continuing operations | (1,560 | ) | | (336,024 | ) | | (54,003 | ) | |
| Net cash provided (used) by investing activities from continuing operations | | 2,053 |
| | (1,560 | ) | | (332,517 | ) |
| Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from credit facility, net of debt issuance costs and debt discount of $9,730 and $12,000 in 2015 | — |
| | 378,270 |
| | 36,556 |
| |
| Proceeds from credit facility, net of debt issuance costs and debt discount of $5,913 and $1,875 in 2017 and $9,730 and $12,000 in 2015, respectively | | 365,836 |
| | — |
| | 378,270 |
|
| Repurchase of convertible notes | (20,667 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (172,827 | ) | | (20,667 | ) | | — |
|
| Repayment of credit facility | (140,000 | ) | | (51,940 | ) | | (56,000 | ) | (290,000 | ) | | (140,000 | ) | | (51,940 | ) |
| Repayment of note payable with related party | (3,200 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (3,200 | ) | | (3,200 | ) | | — |
|
| Stock repurchases | — |
| | (7,735 | ) | | (38,650 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (7,735 | ) |
| Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activity | 15,957 |
| | 7,967 |
| | 6,398 |
| |
| Proceeds from stock option exercises | 2,216 |
| | 2,409 |
| | 6,730 |
| 40,271 |
| | 2,216 |
| | 2,409 |
|
| Proceeds from issuance of stock through employee stock purchase plan | 1,402 |
| | 1,193 |
| | 1,376 |
| 1,429 |
| | 1,402 |
| | 1,193 |
|
| Tax payments from shares withheld for equity awards | (1,752 | ) | | (1,545 | ) | | (2,875 | ) | (9,095 | ) | | (1,752 | ) | | (1,545 | ) |
| Contingent consideration payments for business acquisition | | (946 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | | (30 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net cash provided (used) by financing activities from continuing operations | (146,044 | ) | | 328,619 |
| | (46,465 | ) | (68,562 | ) | | (162,001 | ) | | 320,652 |
|
| Net cash provided (used) by continuing operations | (76,389 | ) | | 8,936 |
| | (80,340 | ) | 6,337 |
| | (77,591 | ) | | 12,443 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations | 14,047 |
| | 14,108 |
| | 41,406 |
| — |
| | 14,047 |
| | 22,126 |
|
| Net cash provided (used) by investing activities from discontinued operations | 83,608 |
| | (540 | ) | | (47,933 | ) | 1,028 |
| | 83,608 |
| | (540 | ) |
| Net cash provided (used) by financing activities from discontinued operations | (25,000 | ) | | (8,982 | ) | | 8,886 |
| |
| Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued operations | | — |
| | (25,000 | ) | | (17,000 | ) |
| Net cash provided by discontinued operations | 72,655 |
| | 4,586 |
| | 2,359 |
| 1,028 |
| | 72,655 |
| | 4,586 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (26 | ) | | (17 | ) | | — |
| 78 |
| | (26 | ) | | (17 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (3,760 | ) | | 13,505 |
| | (77,981 | ) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | | 7,443 |
| | (4,962 | ) | | 17,012 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 55,473 |
| | 41,968 |
| | 119,949 |
| 54,868 |
| | 59,830 |
| | 42,818 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 51,713 |
| | $ | 55,473 |
| | $ | 41,968 |
| $ | 62,311 |
| | $ | 54,868 |
| | $ | 59,830 |
|
| Non-cash investing and financing activities from continuing operations: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment through leasehold incentives (investing) | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 120 |
| |
| Cash paid for income taxes from continuing operations | $ | 2,012 |
| | $ | 614 |
| | $ | 684 |
| $ | 1,267 |
| | $ | 2,012 |
| | $ | 614 |
|
| Cash paid for interest from continuing operations | $ | 32,377 |
| | $ | 8,994 |
| | $ | 9,469 |
| $ | 23,316 |
| | $ | 32,377 |
| | $ | 8,994 |
|
BLUCORA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
|
|
Note 1: The Company and BasisDescription of Presentationthe Business |
Description of the business: Blucora, Inc. (the “Company” or “Blucora”) operates two businesses: a Wealth Management business and an online Tax Preparation business. The Wealth Management business consists of the operations of HDV Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“"HD Vest”Vest"), which the Company acquired on December 31, 2015. HD Vest is included in Blucora's results of operations beginning on January 1, 2016. HD Vest provides wealth management solutions for financial advisors and their clients.. HDV Holdings, Inc. is the parent company of the Wealth Management business and owns all outstanding shares of HD Vest, Inc., which serves as a holding company for the various financial services subsidiaries. Those subsidiaries include HD Vest Investment Securities, Inc. (a clearing(an introducing broker-dealer), HDH.D. Vest Advisory Services, Inc. (a registered investment advisor)adviser), and HDH.D. Vest Insurance Agency, LLC (an insurance broker) (collectively referred to as the "Wealth Management business" or the "Wealth Management segment"). The Tax Preparation business consists of the operations of TaxAct, Inc. and its subsidiary (“TaxAct”"TaxAct") and provides digital tax preparation solutions for consumers, small business owners, and tax professionals through its website www.TaxAct.com.www.TaxAct.com (collectively referred to as the "Tax Preparation business" or the "Tax Preparation segment").
ThePrior to 2017, the Company also operated an internet Search and Content business and an E-Commerce business. The Search and Content business operated through the InfoSpace LLC subsidiary (“InfoSpace”) and provided search services to users of its owned and operated and distribution partners’ web properties, as well as online content through HowStuffWorks (“HSW”). The E-Commerce business consisted of the operations of Monoprice, Inc. (“Monoprice”) and sold self-branded electronics and accessories to both consumers and businesses primarily through its website www.monoprice.com.
On October 14, 2015, the Company announced its plans to focus on the technology-enabled financial solutions market (the “Strategic Transformation”). Strategic Transformation refers to the Company's transformation into a technology-enabled financial solutions company comprised of TaxAct and HD Vest (see "Note 3: Business Combinations") and the divestitures of the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses (see "Note 4: Discontinued Operations"). As part of the Strategic Transformation and “One Company” operating model, the Company announced on October 27, 2016 plans to relocate its corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. The actions to relocate corporate headquarters are intended to drive efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness (see "Note 5: Restructuring").website.
The Company completed both divestitures in 2016. Specifically, on November 17, 2016, the Company closed on an agreement with YFC-Boneagle Electric Co., Ltd (“YFC”), under which YFC acquired the E-Commerce business for $40.5 million. On August 9, 2016, the Company closed on an agreement with OpenMail LLC (“OpenMail”), under which OpenMail acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain specified liabilities of the Search and Content business for $45.2 million.
The financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the notes to financial statements reflect the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Except for disclosures related to equity and unless otherwise specified, disclosures in these consolidated financial statements reflect continuing operations.
On October 14, 2015, the Company announced its plans to focus on the technology-enabled financial solutions market (the "Strategic Transformation"). Strategic Transformation refers to the Company's transformation into a technology-enabled financial solutions company comprised of TaxAct and HD Vest and the divestitures of the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses in 2016. As part of the Strategic Transformation and "One Company" operating model, the Company announced on October 27, 2016 plans to relocate its corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas. The actions to relocate corporate headquarters were intended to drive efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness. The restructuring is now substantially complete and it is expected to be completed by early 2018.
Segments: The Company has two reportable segments: the Wealth Management segment, which is the HD Vest business, and the Tax Preparation segment, which is the TaxAct business. The former Search and Content and E-Commerce segments are included in discontinued operations. The former Search and Content segment is the InfoSpace business, which includes HSW, and the former E-Commerce segment is the Monoprice business. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the Company uses the term “Wealth Management” to represent services sold through the HD Vest business, the term “Tax Preparation” to represent services and software sold through the TaxAct business, the term “Search and Content” to represent search and content services, and the term “E-Commerce” to represent products sold through the Monoprice business (see "business.
ReclassificationNote 13: Segment Information: The Company reclassified certain amounts on its consolidated statements of cash flows related to excess tax benefits generated from stock-based compensation and restricted cash, both in connection with the implementation of new accounting pronouncements. See the ").Recent accounting pronouncements" section of "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.
Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and disclosure of contingencies. Estimates include those used for impairment
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
of goodwill and other intangible assets, useful lives of other intangible assets, acquisition accounting, valuation of investments, revenue recognition, the estimated allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, internally developed software, accrued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
contingencies, stock option valuation, and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual amounts may differ from estimates.
Net capital and regulatory requirements: The Company's HD Vest broker-dealer subsidiary operates in a highly regulated industry and is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have substantial monetary and non-monetary impacts to HD Vest's operations. As of December 31, 2016,2017, HD Vest met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
Seasonality: Blucora’s Tax Preparation segment is highly seasonal, with a significant portion of its annual revenue earned in the first four months of the Company’s fiscal year. During the third and fourth quarters, the Tax Preparation segment typically reports losses because revenue from the segment is minimal while core operating expenses continue.
|
|
| Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Cash equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of ninety days or less at date of acquisition to be cash equivalents.
Cash segregated under federal or other regulations: Cash segregated under federal and other regulations is held in a special bank account for the exclusive benefit of the Company’s wealth management customers.
Short-termAvailable-for-sale investments: The Company principally invests its available cash in fixed-rate debt securities. Fixed-rate debt securities generally include debt instruments issued by the U.S. federal government and its agencies, international governments, municipalities and publicly-held corporations, as well as commercial paper, insured time deposits with commercial banks, and money market funds invested in securities issued by agencies of the U.S., although specific holdings can vary from period to period depending upon the Company's cash requirements. Such investments are included in "Cash and cash equivalents" and "Available-for-sale investments" on the consolidated balance sheets and reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company reviews its available-for-sale investments for impairment and classifies the impairment of any individual available-for-sale investment as either temporary or other-than-temporary. The differentiating factors between temporary and other-than-temporary impairments are primarily the length of the time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. An impairment classified as temporary is recognized in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" on the consolidated balance sheets. An impairment classified as other-than-temporary is recognized in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Accounts receivable: Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.accounts, which was not material at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Property and equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed under the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
| |
| Computer equipment and software | 3 years |
| Data center servers | 3 years |
| Internally-developed software | 3 years |
| Office equipment | 7 years |
| Office furniture | 7 years |
| Leasehold improvements | Shorter of lease term or economic life |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
The Company capitalizes certain internal-use software development costs, consisting primarily of contractor costs and employee salaries and benefits allocated on a project or product basis. The Company capitalized $1.0$3.5 million, $0.3$1.0 million, and $0.3 million of internal-use software costs in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively.
Business combinations and intangible assets including goodwill: The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method. The acquisition-date fair value of total consideration includes cash and contingent consideration. Since the Company is contractually obligated to pay contingent consideration upon the achievement of specified objectives, a contingent consideration liability is recorded at the acquisition date. The Company reviews its assumptions related to the fair value of the contingent consideration liability each reporting period and, if there are material changes, revalues the contingent consideration liability based on the revised assumptions, until such contingency is satisfied through payment upon the achievement of the specified objectives. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability is recognized in "General and administrative" expense on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the period in which the fair value changes.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the acquisition-date fair value of total consideration over the acquisition-date fair value of net assets, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets, and is assigned to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination as of the acquisition date. Reporting units are consistent with reportable segments and included the former Search and Content and E-Commerce segments. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives on a straight-line basis, except for advisor relationships which are amortized proportional to expected revenue. Acquisition-related costs, including advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other similar costs, are expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. The results of operations of acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date.
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment: The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, as of November 30, or more frequently when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. As part of the impairment evaluation, the Company may elect to perform an assessment of qualitative factors. If this qualitative assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit (for goodwill) or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value, or if the Company elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, the Company then would proceed with the quantitative impairment test.
The goodwill quantitative impairment test isCompany performed a two-step processqualitative assessment as of November 30, 2017, and determined that first compares the carrying values of reporting units to their fair values. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of impairment. This second step determines the current fair values of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and then compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit'sno conditions existed that would make it more likely than not that goodwill to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
The indefinite-lived intangible asset quantitative impairment test compares the carrying value of the intangible asset to its fair value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
Fair value typically is estimated using the present value of future discounted cash flows, an income approach. The significant estimates in the discounted cash flow model include the weighted-average cost of capital, long-term rates of revenue growth and/or profitability of our businesses, and working capital effects. The weighted-average cost of capital considers the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to each business's ability to achieve the projected cash flows. To validate the reasonableness of the reporting unit fair values, the Company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units to the aggregate market value of its common stock on the date of valuation, while considering a reasonable acquisition premium. These estimates and the resulting valuations require significant judgment.indefinite-lived assets were impaired. Therefore, no further quantitative assessment was required.
Definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of pre-tax undiscounted future cash flows, using the Company's best estimates of future net sales and operating expenses, expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or group of assets over the remaining economic life of the primary asset in the asset group. The Company measures the amount of the impairment as the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" for discussion of impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in the fourth quartersquarter of 2015 and 2014.
Debt issuance costs and debt discounts: Debt issuance costs and debt discounts are deferred and amortized as interest expense under the effective interest method over the contractual term of the related debt, adjusted for prepayments in the case of the Company’s credit facilities (see "Note 9: Debt"). Debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements are recorded in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net." All other debt issuance costs and debt discounts are recorded as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the recognized debt.
Debt issuance costs related to the Company’s Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”) issued in 2013 were allocated to the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt issuance costs allocated to the liability component are amortized to interest expense through the earlier of the maturity date of the Notes or the date of conversion, if any, adjusted for repurchases. The debt issuance costs allocated to the equity component of the Notes were recorded as an offset to "Additional paid-in capital" (See "Note 9: Debt").2015.
Fair value of financial instruments: The Company measures its cash equivalents, available-for-sale investments, and contingent consideration liability at fair value. The Company considers the carrying values of accounts receivable, commissions receivable, other receivables, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, commissions and advisory fees payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities to approximate fair values primarily due to their short-term natures.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Cash equivalents and debt securities are classified within Level 2 (see "Note 7: Fair Value Measurements") of the fair value hierarchy because the Company values its cash equivalents and debt securitiesthem utilizing market observable inputs. Unrealized gains and losses are included in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" on the consolidated balance sheets, and amounts reclassified out of comprehensive income into net income are determined on the basis of specific identification.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
The Company has a contingent consideration liability that is related to the Company's 2015 acquisition of SimpleTax Software Inc. (“SimpleTax”"SimpleTax") and is classified within Level 3 (see "Note 7: Fair Value Measurements") of the fair value hierarchy because the Company values the liabilityit utilizing significant inputs not observable in the market. Specifically, the Company has determined the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis, which includes assumptions related to estimating revenues, the probability of payment, and the discount rate. The Company accounts for contingent consideration in accordance with applicable accounting guidance pertaining to business combinations, as disclosed in the accounting policy "Business combinations and intangible assets including goodwill."combinations.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests: Noncontrolling interests that are redeemable at the option of the holder and not solely within the control of the issuer are classified outside of stockholders' equity. In connection with the acquisition of HD Vest, management of that business has retained an ownership interest. The Company is party to put and call arrangements with respect to these interests. These put and call arrangements allow HD Vest management to require the Company to purchase their interests or allow the Company to acquire such interests, respectively. The put arrangements do not meet the definition of a derivative instrument as the put agreements do not provide for net settlement. To the extent that the redemption value of these interests exceeds the value determined by adjusting the carrying value for the subsidiary's attribution of net income (loss), the value of such interests is adjusted to the redemption value with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital. The redemption amount at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $12.4 million and $11.6 million.million, respectively.
Revenue recognition, general: The Company recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the Company has delivered the product or performed the service, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. Determining whether and when these criteria have been satisfied involves judgment, and estimates and assumptions that can have an impact on the timing and amount of revenue that the Company recognizes.
Revenue is recognized net of allowances, which are management's estimates of fees to be paid to a third party service provider for fulfillment of the Company's audit defense services. These fees are not material and generally include an estimate of audit defense fees to be paid, based on an analysis of historical data and contractual terms, and are recorded when revenue is recognized. The Company believes that it can reasonably and reliably estimate fees to the third party service provider in a timely manner.
The Company evaluates whether revenue should be presented on a gross basis, which is the amount that a customer pays for the service or product, or on a net basis, which is the customer payment less amounts the Company pays to suppliers. In making that evaluation, the Company primarily considers indicators such as whether the Company is the primary obligor in the arrangement and assumes the risks and rewards as a principal in the customer transaction. The evaluation of these factors, which at times can be contradictory, are subject to significant judgment and subjectivity.
Wealth management revenue recognition: Wealth management revenue consists primarily of commission revenue, advisory revenue, asset-based revenue, and transaction and fee revenue. Revenue is recognized in the periods in which the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
related services are performed, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Payments received by the Company in advance of the performance of service are deferred and recognized as revenue when earned.
The Company considers the nature of its contractual arrangements in determining whether to recognize certain types of wealth Of Wealth management revenues, commissions revenue primarily commission revenue and advisory revenue, on the basis of the gross amount billed or net amount retained after payments are made to providers of certain services related to the product or service offering. The main factors that the Company uses to determine whether to record revenue on a gross or net basis are whether:
the Company is primarily responsible for the service to the financial advisor and their client;
the Company has discretion in establishing fees paid by the client and fees due to the third-party service provider; and
the Company is involved in the determination of product or service specifications.
When client fees include a portion of charges that are paid to another partycontains subjective judgments and the Company is primarily responsible for providing the service to the client, revenue is recognized on a gross basis in an amount equal to the fee paid by the client. The costuse of revenue recognized is the amount due to the other party. In instances in which another party is primarily responsible for providing the service to the client, revenue is recognized in the net amount retained by the Company. The portion of the fees that are collected from the client by the Company and remitted to the other party are considered pass-through amounts and are not a component of revenue or cost of revenue.estimates.
Further details of wealth management revenue are as follows:
Commission revenue - Commissions represent amounts generated by HD Vest's financial advisors for their clients' purchases and sales of securities and various investment products. The Company generates two types of commissions: transaction-based sales commissions that occur at the point of sale, as well as trailing commissions for which the Company provides ongoing account support to clients of its financial advisors.
The Company records transaction-based sales commission revenue on a trade-date basis, which is when the Company's performance obligations in generating the commissions have been substantially completed. Trailing commission revenue is based on a percentage of the current market value of clients' investment holdings in trail-eligible assets and recognized over the period during which services are performed. Since trailing commission revenue is generally paid in arrears, the Company estimates it based on a number of factors, including stock market index levels and the amount of trailing commission revenues received in prior periods.periods, and also considers historical payout ratios. These estimates are primarily based on historical information and there is not significant judgment involved.
A substantial portion of commission revenue is ultimately paid to financial advisors. The Company records an estimate for transaction-based commissions payable based upon the payout rate of the financial advisor generating the accrued commission revenue. The Company records an estimate for trailing commissions payable based upon historical payout ratios.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Such amounts are recorded as "Commissions and advisory fees payable" on the consolidated balance sheets and "Wealth management services cost of revenue" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Advisory revenue - Advisory revenue includes fees charged to clients in advisory accounts where HD Vest is the Registered Investment Advisor (“RIA”). These fees are based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts. A substantial portion of these advisory fees are paid to the related financial advisor and these payments are classified as "Wealth management services cost of revenue" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Asset-based revenue - Asset-based revenue primarily includes fees from financial product manufacturer sponsorship programs and cash sweep programs and are recognized ratably over the period in which services are provided.
Transaction and fee revenue - The Company charges fees for executing certain transactions in client accounts. Transaction-related charges are recognized on a trade-date basis. Other fees relate to services provided and other
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
account charges as generally outlined in agreements with financial advisors, clients, and financial institutions. Such fees are recognized as services are performed or as earned, as applicable.
Tax preparation revenue recognition: The Company derives revenue from the sale of tax preparation online services, ancillary services, packaged tax preparation software, and multiple element arrangements that may include a combination of these items. Ancillary services include tax preparation support services, data archive services, e-filing services, bank or reloadable pre-paid debit card services, and other value-added services. This revenue is recorded in the Tax Preparation segment.
The Company’s Tax Preparation segment revenue consists primarily of hosted tax preparation online services,include tax preparation support services, data archive services and e-filing services. The Company recognizes revenue from these services as the services are performed and the four revenue recognition criteria described above are met.
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its packaged software when legal title transfers. This is generally when its customers download the software from the Internet or, to a lesser extent, when the software ships. This revenue is recorded in the Tax Preparation segment. Of Tax Preparation revenues, revenues from bank or reloadable prepaid debit card services, and software and/or services that consist of multiple elements contain subjective judgments and the use of estimates.
The bank or reloadable prepaid debit card services are offered to taxpayers as an option to receive their tax refunds in the form of a prepaid bank card or to have the fees for the software and/or services purchased by the customers deducted from their refunds. Other value-added service revenue consists of revenue from revenue sharing and royalty arrangements with third party partners. Revenue for these transactions is recognized when the four revenue recognition criteria described above are met; for some arrangements that is upon filing and for other arrangements that is upon the Company’s determination of when collectibility is probable.
For software and/or services that consist of multiple elements, the Company must: (1) determine whether and when each element has been delivered; (2) determine the fair value of each element using the selling price hierarchy of vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”) of fair value if VSOE is not available, and estimated selling price (“ESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available; and (3) allocate the total price among the various elements based on the relative selling price method. Once the Company has allocated the total price among the various elements, it recognizes revenue when the revenue recognition criteria described above are met for each element.
VSOE generally exists when the Company sells the deliverable separately. When VSOE cannot be established, the Company attempts to establish a selling price for each element based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. When the Company is unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, it uses ESP in its allocation of arrangement consideration. ESP is the estimated price at which the Company would sell the software or service if it were sold on a stand-alone basis. The Company determines ESP for the software or service by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, historical stand-alone sales, pricing practices, market conditions, competitive landscape, internal costs, and gross margin objectives.
In some situations, However, the Company receives advance payments from its customers. The Company defersimpact of multiple element arrangements are not material and primarily impact the timing of revenue associated with these advance payments and recognizes the consideration for each element when the Company ships the software or performs the services, as appropriate. Payments related to data archive services are deferred and recognizedrecognition over the related contractual term.tax filing season, which is concentrated within the first two quarters of the filing period.
Cost of revenue: The Company records the cost of revenue for sales of services when the related revenue is recognized. "Cost of revenue" consists of costs related to the Wealth Management and Tax Preparation businesses, which include commissions to financial advisors, third-party costs, and costs associated with the technical support team and the operation of its data centers. Data center costs include personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, professional services fees (which include technology project consulting fees), software support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting costs, and depreciation. Cost of revenue also includes the amortization of acquired technology.
Engineering and technologyAdvertising expenses: Engineering and technology expenses are associated with the research, development, support, and ongoing enhancements of the Company’s offerings, which include personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, software
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
support and maintenance, bandwidth and hosting, and professional services fees. Research and development expenses were $13.7 million, $4.8 million, and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
Sales and marketing expenses: Sales and marketing expenses consist principally of personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs) and the cost of temporary help and contractors for those engaged in marketing, selling, and sales support operations activities, marketing expenses associated with the HD Vest and TaxAct businesses (which primarily include television, radio, online, text, email, and sponsorship channels), and back office processing support expenses associated with the HD Vest business (occupancy and general office expenses, regulatory fees, and license fees).
Costs for advertising are recorded as expense, and classified within "Sales and marketing" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, when the advertisement appears. Advertising expense totaled $44.0$51.7 million $35.5, $44.0 million, and $33.4$35.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively. Prepaid advertising costs were $0.6$0.3 million and $3.9$0.6 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively.
General and administrative expenses: General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses (salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits, and other employee-related costs), the cost of temporary help and contractors, professional services fees (which include legal, audit, and tax fees), general business development and management expenses, occupancy and general office expenses, business taxes, and insurance expenses.
Stock-based compensation: The Company measures stock-based compensation at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognizes it as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting or service period, as applicable, of the stock award using the straight-line method. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation over the vesting period for each separately vesting portion of a share-based award as if they were individual share-based awards. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Employee benefit plan: The Company has a 401(k) savings plan covering its employees. Eligible employees may contribute through payroll deductions. The Company may match the employees’ 401(k) contributions at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to a continuing resolution, the Company has matched a portion of the 401(k) contributions made by its employees. The amount contributed by the Company ranges from 1% to 4% of an employee's salary, depending upon the percentage contributed by the employee. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company contributed $1.4 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, for employees, with the increase in 2016 due to the acquisition of HD Vest on December 31, 2015.
Leases: The Company leases office space, and these leases are classified as operating leases.
Income taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards, and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and reduces the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent the Company believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of the deferred tax assets, including expectations of future taxable income, recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, and other relevant factors. There is a wide range of possible judgments relating to the valuation of the Company's deferred tax assets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
The Company records liabilities to address uncertain tax positions that have been taken in previously filed tax returns or that are expected to be taken in a future tax return. The determination for required liabilities is based upon an analysis of each individual tax position, taking into consideration whether it is more likely than not that the tax position, based on technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. The tax benefit to be recognized in the financial statements from such a position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The difference between the amount recognized and the total tax position is recorded as a liability. The ultimate resolution of these tax positions may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
Other comprehensive income: Comprehensive income includes net income plus items that are recorded directly to stockholders’ equity, including the net change in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments and foreign currency translation adjustments. Included in the net change in unrealized gains and losses are realized gains or losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses, included in the determination of net income in the period realized. Amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income into net income were determined on the basis of specific identification.
Foreign currency: The financial position and operating results of the Company's foreign operations are consolidated using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities recorded in local currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, while revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the applicable period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" on the consolidated balance sheets. The gain or loss on foreign currency transactions, calculated as the difference between the historical exchange rate and the exchange rate at the applicable measurement date, are recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Concentration of credit risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade accounts receivable, and commissions receivable. These instruments are generally unsecured and uninsured.
For cash equivalents, short-term investments, and commissions receivable, the Company attempts to manage exposure to counterparty credit risk by only entering into agreements with major financial institutions and investment sponsors that are expected to be able to fully perform under the terms of the agreement.
Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenues earned from customers primarily located in the United States operating in a variety of geographic areas. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses.
Geographic revenue information: Almost all of the Company's revenue for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015 was generated from customers located in the United States.
Recent accounting pronouncements: Changes to GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in the form of accounting standards updates (“ASUs”) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). The Company considers the applicability and impact of all recent ASUs. ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. The Company currently is considering ASUs that impact the following areas:
Revenue recognition - In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance codified in ASC 606, “Revenue"Revenue from Contracts with Customers,”" which amends the guidance in former ASC 605 “Revenue"Revenue Recognition.”" The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This will be achieved in a five-step process. Enhanced disclosures also will be required. This guidance is effective on a retrospective basis--either to each reporting period presented or with the cumulative effect of initially applying this guidance recognized at the date of initial application--for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
The Company has made significant progress towards completing its evaluationwill adopt the requirements of potential changes from adopting the new guidancestandard on its coreJanuary 1, 2018, utilizing the modified retrospective transition method. Upon adoption, the Company will recognize a $1.8 million cumulative effect of adopting this ASU as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings, and will recognize approximately $2.0 million of certain licensing fees as a reduction to both revenues and continues to evaluateoperating expenses on the impactconsolidated statements of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company expects to have its preliminary evaluation, including the selection of an adoption method, completed by the end of the first half of 2017. The Company iscomprehensive income. Prior periods will not planning to early adopt and currently expects to adopt the new guidance in the first quarter of 2018.be retrospectively adjusted.
Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU on lease accounting, whereby lease assets and liabilities, whether arising from leases that are considered operating or finance (capital), and have a term of twelve months or less, will be
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
recognized on the balance sheet. Enhanced qualitative disclosures also will be required. This guidance is effective on a modified retrospective basis--with various practical expedients related to leases that commenced before the effective date--for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. EarlierEarly adoption is permitted. The Company currently is evaluatingexpects that the impactadoption of this guidance onASU will not have a material impact to its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015,disclosures, and 2014
it will adopt this ASU on January 1, 2019.
Stock-based compensation - In March 2016, the FASB issued an ASU on employee share-based payment accounting. The ASU requires that excess tax benefits and deficiencies be recognized as income tax benefit or expense, rather than as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the ASU requires that excess tax benefits be recorded in the period that shares vest or settle, regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the same period. Cash flows related to excess tax benefits will be included as an operating activity, and no longer classified as a financing activity, in the statement of cash flows. This guidance iswas effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier adoption is permitted. The guidance related to the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies as income tax benefit or expense iswas effective on a prospective basis, and the guidance related to the timing of excess tax benefit recognition iswas effective using a modified retrospective transition method with a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. The cash flow presentation guidance iswas effective on a retrospective or prospective basis.
The Company will implementimplemented this ASU on January 1, 2017 and recordrecorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $51.5 million to credit retained earnings of $51.5 million for deferred tax assets related to net operating losses that arose from excess tax benefits, which the Company has deemed realizable. In addition to this:
OnAt the time of adoption and on a prospective basis, the primary impact of adoption will bewas the recognition of current period excess tax benefits and deficiencies, including deferred tax assets related to net operating losses that arose from excess tax benefits which the Company has deemed realizable, in the income tax provision (rather than in additional paid-in capital). This caused income taxes to differ from taxes at the statutory rates in 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized an estimated $20.1 million decrease to the income tax provision, which resulted in a $20.1 million increase to income from continuing operations and net income attributable to Blucora, a $0.45 increase to basic earnings per share, and a $0.43 increase to diluted earnings per share.
The actual impact of this item will depend upon certain variables, includingCompany applied the Company's stock price.
Oncash flow presentation guidance on a retrospective basis, restating the Company willconsolidated statements of cash flows to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity (rather than a financing activity) in. For the statement of cash flows. Beginning with 2017 financial statements, prior period statements of cash flows will be restated, which will resultyear ended December 31, 2016, this resulted in an increase to cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of $16.0 million and a corresponding decrease to cash providedused by financing activities from continuing operationsoperations. The restatement had no impact on total cash flows for the amount historically presented in the "excess tax benefits from stock-based award activity" line item in the statements of cash flows.period presented.
The ASU also clarifies that payments made to tax authorities on an employee's behalf for withheld shares should be presented as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows, allows the repurchase of more of an employee's shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting, and provides an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The cash flow presentation requirements for payments made to tax authorities on an employee's behalf will havehad no impact to any periods presented, since such cash flows historically have been presented as a financing activity. The Company is not planning to change tax withholdings and will continue to estimate forfeitures in determining the amount of compensation cost to be recognized in each period.
Measurement of Credit Losses - In June 2016, the FASB issued an ASU which requires companies to measure credit losses utilizing a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires a consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including those interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting this ASU, but based on a preliminary assessment, does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Statement of cash flows and restricted cash - In November 2016, the FASB issued an ASU on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The ASU requires that the statement of cash flows explains the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash; therefore, the amounts described as restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end of period total
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
amounts on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance is effective on a retrospective basis. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance as of January 1, 2017. The reclassification was not material to the periods presented and had no impact on total cash flows, income from continuing operations, or net income attributable to Blucora for the periods presented.
|
|
| Note 3: Business Combinations |
HD Vest: On December 31, 2015 and pursuant to the Purchase Agreement dated October 14, 2015, the Company acquired HD Vest for $613.7 million, including cash acquired of $38.9 million and after a $1.8 million final working capital adjustment in the first quarter of 2016. HD Vest provides wealth management solutions for financial advisors and their clients and is expected to be synergistic with TaxAct as a result of cross-serving opportunities and an expanded addressable market for both HD Vest and TaxAct. In connection with the acquisition, certain members of HD Vest management rolled over a portion of the proceeds they would have otherwise received at the closing into shares of the acquisition subsidiary through which the Company consummated the purchase of HD Vest. A portion of those shares were sold to the Company in exchange for a promissory note. After giving effect to the rollover shares and related purchase of the rollover shares for the promissory note, the Company indirectly owns 95.52% of HDV Holdings, Inc., with the remaining 4.48% non-controlling interest held collectively by the rollover management members and subject to put and call arrangements exercisable beginning in 2019.
The acquisition was funded by a combination of cash on hand and the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility, under which the Company borrowed $400.0 million (see "Note 9: Debt").
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
Valuations were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | Fair value |
| Tangible assets acquired, including cash acquired of $38,874 | $ | 78,681 |
|
| Liabilities assumed | (21,212 | ) |
| Identifiable net assets acquired | $ | 57,469 |
|
| Fair value adjustments for intangible assets: | |
| Advisor relationships | $ | 240,300 |
|
| Sponsor relationships | 16,500 |
|
| Curriculum | 800 |
|
| Proprietary technology | 13,600 |
|
| Trade name | 52,500 |
|
| Fair value of intangible assets acquired | $ | 323,700 |
|
| Purchase price allocation: | |
| Cash paid | $ | 612,288 |
|
| Plus: promissory note | 6,400 |
|
| Plus: noncontrolling interest | 15,038 |
|
| Less: escrow receivable | (20,000 | ) |
| Purchase price | 613,726 |
|
| Less: identifiable net assets acquired | (57,469 | ) |
| Less: fair value of intangible assets acquired | (323,700 | ) |
| Plus: deferred tax liability related to intangible assets | 123,484 |
|
| Excess of purchase price over net assets acquired, allocated to goodwill | $ | 356,041 |
|
The Company's estimates, at the time of acquisition, of the economic lives of the acquired intangible assets are 20 years for the advisor relationships, 18 years for the sponsor relationships, 4 years for the curriculum, 6 years for the proprietary technology, and the trade name is estimated to have an indefinite life. Goodwill consists largely of the increased cross-serving opportunities and expanded addressable markets for both HD Vest and TaxAct, neither of which apply for separate recognition, and is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
The primary areas of the acquisition accounting that were not yet finalized at the time of the acquisition related to income and non-income based taxes, certain contingent liability matters, indemnification assets, and residual goodwill. In the third and fourth quarters of 2016, the Company recorded a combined $2.1 million increase to net assets acquired and a corresponding decrease to goodwill, predominantly related to the finalization of federal and state tax returns and associated analyses for pre-acquisition tax periods. Acquisition accounting is now considered closed.
The promissory note iswas with the President of HD Vest and willwas scheduled to be paid over a three-year period. The current portion was recorded in "Current portion of long-term debt, net," andIn December 2017, the long-term portion was recorded in "Long-term debt, net."Company fully repaid the remaining $3.2 million outstanding. The note bearsbore interest at a rate of 5% per year, with a principal amount that approximates its fair value. See "Note 9: Debt" for additional information on the "Note payable, related party."year.
The Purchase Agreement dictated that the Company placedplace into escrow $20.0 million of additional consideration that was contingent upon HD Vest's 2015 earnings performance. The contingent consideration threshold was not achieved; therefore, the amount was excluded from the purchase price and recorded as a receivable in "Other receivables" as of December 31, 2015 for the amount that was returnedand paid to the Company from the escrow agent in the first quarter of 2016.
The gross contractual amount of accounts receivable, including commissions receivable, acquired was $21.6 million, all of which the Company has substantially collected.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
During 2015, the Company incurred transaction costs of $11.0 million, which were recognized in "General and administrative expense," and $21.8 million in debt discount and issuance-related costs on the new credit facility.
Pro Forma Financial Information of the HD Vest Acquisition (unaudited):
The financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of Blucora and HD Vest on a pro forma basis, for the period in which the acquisition occurred and the prior reporting period as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of each period presented. Pro forma adjustments have been made to include (a) amortization expense on the definite-lived intangible assets identified in this acquisition, debt-related expenses associated with the credit facility that was used to finance the acquisition, and estimated stock-based compensation related to Blucora share-based award grants to HD Vest employees; and to remove (b) acquisition-related transaction costs and debt-related expenses associated with HD Vest's previous debt facility, the latter of which was paid off and closed at the acquisition date. Income taxes also have been adjusted for the effect of these items. The following pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period presented (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Year ended |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | December 31, 2015 |
| Revenue | $ | 437,447 |
| | $ | 408,573 |
| $ | 437,447 |
|
| Loss from continuing operations | $ | (12,793 | ) | | $ | (16,727 | ) | $ | (12,793 | ) |
SimpleTax: On July 2, 2015, TaxAct acquired all of the equity of SimpleTax, a provider of online tax preparation services for individuals in Canada, for C$2.4 million (with C$ indicating Canadian dollars and amounting to approximately $1.9 million based on the acquisition-date exchange rate) in cash and additional consideration of up to C$4.6$3.7 million ($3.7 million) that is contingent upon product availability and revenue performance over a three-year period. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration as of the acquisition date was C$4.1 million ($3.3 million).$3.3 million. See "Note 7: Fair Value Measurements" for additional information related to the fair value measurement of the contingent consideration.
The acquisition of SimpleTax is strategic to TaxAct and intended to expand its operations. SimpleTax is included in the Tax Preparation segment. Intangible assets acquired amounted to approximately C$1.2$0.9 million, ($0.9 million), consisting of customer relationships and proprietary technology both of which have finite lives. Identifiable net liabilities assumed were not material. Goodwill amounted to C$5.6 million ($4.5 million).$4.5 million. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of this acquisition were not material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
|
|
| Note 4: Discontinued Operations |
On October 14, 2015, the Company announced its plans to focus on the technology-enabled financial solutions market, as more fully described in "Note 1: The Company and BasisDescription of Presentationthe Business." The Strategic Transformation included plans to divest the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses. Financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the notes to financial statements reflect the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Amounts in discontinued operations include previously unallocated depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, income taxes, and other corporate expenses that were attributable to the Search and Content and E-Commerce businesses.
On November 17, 2016, the Company closed on an agreement with YFC, under which YFC acquired the E-Commerce business for $40.5 million, which included a working capital adjustment. Of this amount, $39.5 million was received in the fourth quarter of 2016 and included in "Net cash provided (used) by investing activities from discontinued operations" in the consolidated statements of cash flows, and the remaining $1.0 million is expected to bewas received in the first half of 2017. The Company used all of the proceeds to pay down debt including the Monoprice 2013 credit facility as discussed further under the debt subsection of this note, and recognized a loss on sale of the E-Commerce business of approximately $52.2 million.
On August 9, 2016, the Company closed on an agreement with OpenMail, under which OpenMail acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain specified liabilities of the Search and Content business for $45.2 million, which included a working capital adjustment and was included in "Net cash provided (used) by investing activities from discontinued operations" in the consolidated statements of cash flows.million. The Company used all of the proceeds to pay down debt and recognized a loss on
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
sale of the Search and Content business of approximately $21.6 million. Under a separate agreement, the Company is subleasing to InfoSpace the office space that InfoSpace is using currently. The rent payments and September 2020 termination date are consistent with the underlying non-cancelable operating lease. See "Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies" for additional information.
Summarized financial information for discontinued operations is as follows (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Major classes of items in net income (loss): | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 227,989 |
| | $ | 352,077 |
| | $ | 477,001 |
|
| Operating expenses | (211,395 | ) | | (391,702 | ) | | (490,006 | ) |
| Other loss, net | (719 | ) | | (2,673 | ) | | (1,316 | ) |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes | 15,875 |
| | (42,298 | ) | | (14,321 | ) |
| Loss on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes | (73,800 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Discontinued operations, before income taxes | (57,925 | ) | | (42,298 | ) | | (14,321 | ) |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | (5,196 | ) | | 14,950 |
| | (15,682 | ) |
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | (63,121 | ) | | $ | (27,348 | ) | | $ | (30,003 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Major classes of assets and liabilities: | | | |
| Cash | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,158 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance | — |
| | 26,352 |
|
| Inventories | — |
| | 43,480 |
|
| Other current assets | — |
| | 3,182 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | — |
| | 9,824 |
|
| Goodwill, net | — |
| | 67,201 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | — |
| | 59,006 |
|
| Other long-term assets | — |
| | 460 |
|
| Total assets of discontinued operations | $ | — |
| | $ | 211,663 |
|
| | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | — |
| | $ | 33,295 |
|
| Other current liabilities | — |
| | 15,622 |
|
| Debt (net of discount and including short-term and long-term portions) | — |
| | 25,000 |
|
| Deferred tax liability, net | — |
| | 13,816 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | — |
| | 542 |
|
| Total liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | — |
| | $ | 88,275 |
|
Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations were reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. Goodwill, other intangible assets, and debt are discussed further below in the related subsections of this note. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Major classes of items in net income (loss): | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | 227,989 |
| | $ | 352,077 |
|
| Operating expenses | — |
| | (211,395 | ) | | (391,702 | ) |
| Other income (loss), net | — |
| | (719 | ) | | (2,673 | ) |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes | — |
| | 15,875 |
| | (42,298 | ) |
| Loss on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes | — |
| | (73,800 | ) | | — |
|
| Discontinued operations, before income taxes | — |
| | (57,925 | ) | | (42,298 | ) |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | — |
| | (5,196 | ) | | 14,950 |
|
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | $ | — |
| | $ | (63,121 | ) | | $ | (27,348 | ) |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
Business exit costs: In conjunction with the Strategic Transformation, the Company incurred business exit costs of approximately $4.5 million, which primarily were recorded in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016. The following table summarizes the activity in the business exit cost liability (in thousands):
| | | | Employee-Related Termination Costs | Employee-Related Termination Costs |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | — |
| |
| Charges | 994 |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 994 |
| $ | 994 |
|
| Charges | 3,552 |
| 3,552 |
|
| Payments | (4,396 | ) | (4,396 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 150 |
| 150 |
|
| Charges | | — |
|
| Payments | | — |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | 150 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets: The Company tested the goodwill and trade names related to Search and Content and E-Commerce for impairment as of October 31, 2015, due to the Company's October 2015 announcement of its plans to divest these businesses and their resulting classification as held for sale. In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company recorded goodwill impairments of $15.1 million and $33.8 million related to the Search and Content and E-Commercethese reporting units, respectively, which adjusted the carrying values of the Search and Content and E-Commerce goodwill to $44.8 million and $22.4 million, respectively. In addition, in the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company recorded trade name impairments of $5.9 million and $4.2 million related to the HSW and Monoprice trade names, respectively, which adjusted the carrying values of the HSW and Monoprice trade names to nil and $30.6 million, respectively.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment related to E-Commerce of $59.4 million and a trade name impairment of $3.2 million related to the Monoprice trade name.
The impairments of goodwill and intangible assets were recorded in discontinued operations. The Company classified the fair value of its reporting units, goodwill, and trade names within Level 3 because they were valued using discounted cash flows, which have significant unobservable inputs related to the weighted-average cost of capital and forecasts of future cash flows. Refer to "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for a description of the Company's reporting units and the method used to determine the fair values of those reporting units and the amount of goodwill impairment.
The Company determined that the impairments related to Search and Content and E-Commerce were indicators requiring the review of the Search and Content and E-Commerce long-lived assets for recoverability. The results of this review indicated that the carrying values of the Search and Content and E-Commerce long-lived assets were recoverable.
Debt: The debt in discontinued operations consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Monoprice 2013 credit facility | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,000 |
|
On November 22, 2013, Monoprice entered into a credit facility agreement, which consisted of a $30.0 million revolving credit loan and until repaid in full in 2015 as discussed in the next paragraph, also consisted of a $40.0 million term loan.loan, both of which have since been settled. The final maturity date of the credit facility was November 22, 2018 but became immediately due and payable upon the sale of Monoprice in November 2016.
Monoprice initially borrowed $50.0 million under the credit facility, from both the revolving credit loan and the term loan, and had net repayment activity of $25.0 million and $17.0 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.no repayment activity in 2017 as Monoprice was no longer owned by the Company. Monoprice had the right to permanently reduce, without premium or penalty, the credit facility at any time. In accordance with this provision, Monoprice repaid the outstanding amount under the term loan in full in 2015, which was included in the net repayment activity for 2015 and resulted in the write-down of the remaining unamortized discount and debt issuance costs related to the term loan.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
On October 27, 2016, the Company announced plans to relocate its corporate headquarters by June 2017 from Bellevue, Washington to Irving, Texas as part of the Strategic Transformation and “One Company” operating model. The actions to relocate corporate headquarters are intended to drive efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness.
Texas. In connection with this plan, the Company expects to incurhas incurred restructuring costs of approximately $5.4$7.0 million. These costs will primarily be recorded in "Restructuring" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and within corporate-level activity for segment purposes. While the relocationThe Company has also incurred costs that were not included as restructuring, such as recruiting and the related costs areoverlap in personnel expenses as it transitions positions to Texas ("Strategic Transformation Costs"). The restructuring is now substantially complete and it is expected to be substantially completed by June 2017, the Company expects some costs through the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily related to employees who will continue to provide service through that time period.early 2018.
The following table summarizes the activity in the restructuring liability (in thousands):
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Employee-Related Termination Costs | | Other Costs | | Stock-Based Compensation | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Charges | 4,234 |
| | — |
| | (364 | ) | | 3,870 |
|
| Non-cash | — |
| | — |
| | 364 |
| | 364 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 4,234 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,234 |
|
Total amount expected to be incurred (1) | $ | 4,707 |
| | $ | 155 |
| | $ | 574 |
| | $ | 5,436 |
|
| Cumulative amount incurred to date | $ | 4,234 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (364 | ) | | $ | 3,870 |
|
(1) Does not include the impact of the non-cancelable operating lease and related fixed assets, which are discussed further in the last paragraph of this note. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Employee-Related Termination Costs | | Contract Termination Costs | | Fixed Asset Impairments | | Stock-Based Compensation | | Other Costs | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Restructuring charges | 4,234 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (364 | ) | | — |
| | 3,870 |
|
| Non-cash | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 364 |
| | — |
| | 364 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 4,234 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,234 |
|
| Restructuring charges | 261 |
| | (241 | ) | | 1,878 |
| | 1,148 |
| | 55 |
| | 3,101 |
|
| Payments | (3,293 | ) | | (535 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) | | (3,883 | ) |
| Non-cash | — |
| | 1,457 |
| | (1,878 | ) | | (1,148 | ) | | — |
| | (1,569 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 1,202 |
| | $ | 681 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,883 |
|
Employee-related termination costs primarily include severance benefits, under both ongoing and one-time benefit arrangements that are payablewere paid at termination dates throughout 2017, with the majority expected to be paid in the second half of 2017. OtherContract termination costs include office moving costs.and fixed asset impairments were incurred in connection with the Bellevue facility's operating lease and related fixed assets, which are described further in the next two paragraphs, respectively. Stock-based compensation primarily includes the impact of equity award modifications associated with employment contracts for certain individuals impacted by the relocation, as well as forfeitures that were recorded for severed employees. Other costs include office relocation costs.
The Company has a non-cancelable operating lease that runs through 2020 for its former corporate headquarters in Bellevue, Washington, which the Company occupied until May 2017. In March 2017, the Company agreed to a sublease for the entire Bellevue facility, which was effective June 1, 2017 and expires on September 30, 2020, consistent with the underlying operating lease. Under that sublease agreement, the Company will occupy until June 2017. not recover all of its remaining lease rental obligations (including common area maintenance costs and real estate taxes) and, therefore, recognized a net loss on sublease of $0.4 million.
The Company currently is evaluating various cost mitigation options, including a subleasefully impaired the $1.9 million carrying value of the facility and the related leasehold improvements and the office furniture and equipment. If Blucora is unable to sublease, there couldequipment that would not be contract termination feesfully recovered in connection with this lease.
All of up to $2.5 million based upon a July 1, 2017 vacate date and fixed asset-related costs for assets, net of deferred rent, that had a carrying value of $0.4 million as of December 31, 2016. These costs would be accrued at the termination or cease-use date, which is expectedthese items were recorded in the first halfquarter of 2017. If Blucora is able to sublease, there could be costs related to tenant improvement allowance, rent abatement, and/or broker commissions, which would be accrued when incurred.
|
|
| Note 6: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The following table presents goodwill by reportable segment (in thousands):
| | | | Wealth Management | | Tax Preparation | | Total | Wealth Management | | Tax Preparation | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | — |
| | $ | 188,541 |
| | $ | 188,541 |
| |
| Additions | 356,386 |
| | 4,473 |
| | 360,859 |
| |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | (441 | ) | | (441 | ) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 356,386 |
| | 192,573 |
| | 548,959 |
| $ | 356,386 |
| | $ | 192,573 |
| | $ | 548,959 |
|
| Purchase accounting adjustments | (345 | ) | | — |
| | (345 | ) | (345 | ) | | — |
| | (345 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | 127 |
| | 127 |
| — |
| | 127 |
| | 127 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 356,041 |
| | $ | 192,700 |
| | $ | 548,741 |
| 356,041 |
| | 192,700 |
| | 548,741 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | — |
| | 296 |
| | 296 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | 356,041 |
| | $ | 192,996 |
| | $ | 549,037 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
The purchase accounting adjustment in 2016 primarily related to the final working capital adjustment and the finalization of federal and state tax returns associated with the acquisition of HD Vest. The goodwill additions in 2015 related to the acquisitions of HD Vest (Wealth Management segment) and SimpleTax (Tax Preparation segment). The 2016 and 2015 activity areis described in "Note 3: Business Combinations."
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Intangible assets other than goodwill consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
| | Gross carrying amount | | Accumulated amortization | | Net | | Gross carrying amount | | Accumulated amortization | | Net |
| Definite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships | $ | 101,690 |
| | $ | (62,381 | ) | | $ | 39,309 |
| | $ | 101,681 |
| | $ | (49,664 | ) | | $ | 52,017 |
|
| Advisor relationships | 240,300 |
| | (17,138 | ) | | 223,162 |
| | 240,300 |
| | — |
| | 240,300 |
|
| Sponsor relationships | 16,500 |
| | (917 | ) | | 15,583 |
| | 16,500 |
| | — |
| | 16,500 |
|
| Curriculum | 800 |
| | (200 | ) | | 600 |
| | 800 |
| | — |
| | 800 |
|
| Technology | 43,855 |
| | (32,331 | ) | | 11,524 |
| | 43,948 |
| | (29,270 | ) | | 14,678 |
|
| Total definite-lived intangible assets | 403,145 |
| | (112,967 | ) | | 290,178 |
| | 403,229 |
| | (78,934 | ) | | 324,295 |
|
| Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade names | 72,000 |
| | — |
| | 72,000 |
| | 72,000 |
| | — |
| | 72,000 |
|
| Total | $ | 475,145 |
| | $ | (112,967 | ) | | $ | 362,178 |
| | $ | 475,229 |
| | $ | (78,934 | ) | | $ | 396,295 |
|
There were advisor relationship, sponsor relationship, curriculum, and technology additions in 2015 related to the acquisition of HD Vest (Wealth Management segment). There also were customer relationship and technology additions in 2015 related to the acquisition of SimpleTax (Tax Preparation segment). Both acquisitions are described in "Note 3: Business Combinations." |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| | Weighted Average Amortization Period (months) | Gross carrying amount | | Accumulated amortization | | Net | | Gross carrying amount | | Accumulated amortization | | Net |
| Definite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships | 25 | $ | 101,711 |
| | $ | (75,105 | ) | | $ | 26,606 |
| | $ | 101,690 |
| | $ | (62,381 | ) | | $ | 39,309 |
|
| Advisor relationships | 216 | 240,300 |
| | (34,211 | ) | | 206,089 |
| | 240,300 |
| | (17,138 | ) | | 223,162 |
|
| Sponsor relationships | 192 | 16,500 |
| | (1,833 | ) | | 14,667 |
| | 16,500 |
| | (917 | ) | | 15,583 |
|
| Curriculum | 24 | 800 |
| | (400 | ) | | 400 |
| | 800 |
| | (200 | ) | | 600 |
|
| Technology | 47 | 43,895 |
| | (35,452 | ) | | 8,443 |
| | 43,855 |
| | (32,331 | ) | | 11,524 |
|
| Total definite-lived intangible assets | 189 | 403,206 |
| | (147,001 | ) | | 256,205 |
| | 403,145 |
| | (112,967 | ) | | 290,178 |
|
| Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade names | | 72,000 |
| | — |
| | 72,000 |
| | 72,000 |
| | — |
| | 72,000 |
|
| Total | | $ | 475,206 |
| | $ | (147,001 | ) | | $ | 328,205 |
| | $ | 475,145 |
| | $ | (112,967 | ) | | $ | 362,178 |
|
Amortization expense was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Statement of comprehensive income line item: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue | $ | 812 |
| | $ | 7,546 |
| | $ | 7,450 |
| $ | 195 |
| | $ | 812 |
| | $ | 7,546 |
|
| Amortization of other acquired intangible assets | 33,331 |
| | 12,757 |
| | 12,742 |
| 33,807 |
| | 33,331 |
| | 12,757 |
|
| Total | $ | 34,143 |
| | $ | 20,303 |
| | $ | 20,192 |
| $ | 34,002 |
| | $ | 34,143 |
| | $ | 20,303 |
|
Expected amortization of definite-lived intangible assets held as of December 31, 20162017 is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | Thereafter | | Total | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Statement of comprehensive income line item: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Statement of comprehensive income (loss) line item: | | Statement of comprehensive income (loss) line item: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue | $ | 188 |
| | $ | 94 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 282 |
| $ | 101 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 101 |
|
| Amortization of other acquired intangible assets | 33,155 |
| | 32,844 |
| | 32,607 |
| | 20,254 |
| | 17,423 |
| | 153,613 |
| | 289,896 |
| 33,061 |
| | 32,321 |
| �� | 19,969 |
| | 17,138 |
| | 14,843 |
| | 138,772 |
| | 256,104 |
|
| Total | $ | 33,343 |
| | $ | 32,938 |
| | $ | 32,607 |
| | $ | 20,254 |
| | $ | 17,423 |
| | $ | 153,613 |
| | $ | 290,178 |
| $ | 33,162 |
| | $ | 32,321 |
| | $ | 19,969 |
| | $ | 17,138 |
| | $ | 14,843 |
| | $ | 138,772 |
| | $ | 256,205 |
|
The weighted average amortization periods for definite-lived intangible assets are as follows: 37 months for customer relationships, 228 months for advisor relationships, 204 months for sponsor relationships, 36 months for curriculum, 59 months for technology, and 194 months for total definite-lived intangible assets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
|
|
| Note 7: Fair Value Measurements |
In accordance with ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," certain of the Company's assets and liabilities, which are carried at fair value, are classified in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs, other than Level 1, or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and reflect the Company’s own assumptions.
The fair value hierarchy of the Company's financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | Fair value measurements at the reporting date using |
| | Quoted prices in active markets using identical assets (Level 1) | | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
| Cash equivalents: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government securities | $ | 2,749 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,749 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Money market and other funds | 4,090 |
| | — |
| | 4,090 |
| | — |
|
| Commercial paper | 1,999 |
| | — |
| | 1,999 |
| | — |
|
| Taxable municipal bonds | 1,301 |
| | — |
| | 1,301 |
| | — |
|
| Total cash equivalents | 10,139 |
| | — |
| | 10,139 |
| | — |
|
| Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | | | |
| Debt securities: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government securities | 2,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,000 |
| | — |
|
| Commercial paper | 1,998 |
| | — |
| | 1,998 |
| | — |
|
| Time deposits | 807 |
| | — |
| | 807 |
| | — |
|
| Taxable municipal bonds | 2,296 |
| | — |
| | 2,296 |
| | — |
|
| Total debt securities | 7,101 |
| | — |
| | 7,101 |
| | — |
|
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 17,240 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17,240 |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability | $ | 3,421 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,421 |
|
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 3,421 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,421 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 | | Fair value measurements at the reporting date using |
| | Quoted prices in active markets using identical assets (Level 1) | | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
| Cash equivalents: money market and other funds | $ | 10,857 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,857 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 10,857 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,857 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability | $ | 2,689 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,689 |
|
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 2,689 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,689 |
|
| | | | December 31, 2015 | | Fair value measurements at the reporting date using | December 31, 2016 | | Fair value measurements at the reporting date using |
| | Quoted prices in active markets using identical assets (Level 1) | | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) | Quoted prices in active markets using identical assets (Level 1) | | Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) | | Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
| Cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government securities | | $ | 2,749 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,749 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Money market and other funds | $ | 5,410 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,410 |
| | $ | — |
| 4,090 |
| | — |
| | 4,090 |
| | — |
|
| Commercial paper | | 1,999 |
| | — |
| | 1,999 |
| | — |
|
| Taxable municipal bonds | | 1,301 |
| | — |
| | 1,301 |
| | — |
|
| Total cash equivalents | | 10,139 |
| | — |
| | 10,139 |
| | — |
|
| Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government securities | 11,301 |
| | — |
| | 11,301 |
| | — |
| 2,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,000 |
| | — |
|
| Commercial paper | | 1,998 |
| | — |
| | 1,998 |
| | — |
|
| Time deposits | | 807 |
| | — |
| | 807 |
| | — |
|
| Taxable municipal bonds | | 2,296 |
| | — |
| | 2,296 |
| | — |
|
| Total debt securities | | 7,101 |
| | — |
| | 7,101 |
| | — |
|
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 16,711 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,711 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 17,240 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 17,240 |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability | $ | 2,951 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,951 |
| $ | 3,421 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,421 |
|
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 2,951 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,951 |
| $ | 3,421 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,421 |
|
The Company also had financial instruments that were not measured at fair value. See "Note 9: Debt" for details.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
A reconciliation of Level 3 items measured at fair value on a recurring basis was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability: | | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 2,951 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 3,421 |
| | $ | 2,951 |
|
| Initial estimate upon acquisition | — |
| | 3,274 |
| |
| Payment | | (946 | ) | | — |
|
| Revaluation | 391 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 391 |
|
| Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss | 79 |
| | (323 | ) | |
| Foreign currency transaction loss | | 214 |
| | 79 |
|
| Balance at end of year | $ | 3,421 |
| | $ | 2,951 |
| $ | 2,689 |
| | $ | 3,421 |
|
The contingent consideration liability is related to the Company's acquisition of SimpleTax (see "Note 3: Business Combinations"), and the related payments that began in 2017 and are expected to occurcontinue annually beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019. As2019.As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company could be required to pay up to an undiscounted amount of $3.4$2.7 million. TheThis liability is included within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the Company values it utilizing inputs not observable in the market. Specifically, the Company has determined the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis, which includes assumptions related to estimating revenues, the probability of payment (100%), and the discount rate (9%). A decrease in estimated revenues or an increase in the discount rate would decrease the fair value of the contingent consideration liability. As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company recorded approximately $0.9$1.3 million in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" and $2.5$1.4 million in "Other long-term liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets.
In 2016, the Company had non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements related to the repurchase of its Convertible Senior Notes. See "Note 9: Debt" for details. In 2015, and 2014, the Company had non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements related to its reporting units and various intangible assets as part of goodwill and intangible asset impairment reviews. See "Note 4: Discontinued Operations" for details.
The contractual maturities of the debt securities classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were less than one year.
The cost and fair value of available-for-sale investments were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair value |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 7,102 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 7,101 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 11,316 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | 11,301 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair value |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 7,102 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 7,101 |
|
|
|
| Note 8: Balance Sheet Components |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Prepaid expenses | $ | 5,990 |
| | $ | 9,893 |
| $ | 6,972 |
| | $ | 5,990 |
|
| Other current assets, net | 331 |
| | 169 |
| 393 |
| | 331 |
|
| Total prepaid expenses and other current assets, net | $ | 6,321 |
| | $ | 10,062 |
| $ | 7,365 |
| | $ | 6,321 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| 2016 |
| 2015 | 2017 |
| 2016 |
| Computer equipment and data center | $ | 6,884 |
|
| $ | 5,383 |
| $ | 7,121 |
|
| $ | 6,884 |
|
| Purchased software | 4,420 |
|
| 2,115 |
| 4,200 |
|
| 4,420 |
|
| Internally-developed software | 2,478 |
|
| 1,999 |
| 2,728 |
|
| 2,478 |
|
| Office equipment | 745 |
|
| 587 |
| 557 |
|
| 745 |
|
| Office furniture | 1,532 |
|
| 1,529 |
| 801 |
|
| 1,532 |
|
| Leasehold improvements and other | 6,246 |
|
| 6,131 |
| 3,244 |
|
| 6,246 |
|
| 22,305 |
|
| 17,744 |
| 18,651 |
|
| 22,305 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | (12,269 | ) |
| (6,915 | ) | (12,081 | ) |
| (12,269 | ) |
| 10,036 |
|
| 10,829 |
| 6,570 |
|
| 10,036 |
|
| Capital projects in progress | 800 |
|
| 479 |
| 3,261 |
|
| 800 |
|
| Total property and equipment, net | $ | 10,836 |
|
| $ | 11,308 |
| $ | 9,831 |
|
| $ | 10,836 |
|
Total depreciation expense was $4.1 million, $4.5 million, $2.3 million, and $2.0$2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively.
Unamortized internally-developed software, which excludes software projects in progress that are included in capital projects in progress above, was $4.1 million and $1.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015.respectively. The Company recorded depreciationamortization expense for internally-developed software of $0.9 million, $1.0 million, $0.3 million, and $0.2$0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, respectively.
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Salaries and related expenses | $ | 12,506 |
| | $ | 7,581 |
| $ | 12,451 |
| | $ | 12,506 |
|
| Accrued interest on Notes (see Note 9) | 1,837 |
| | 2,138 |
| — |
| | 1,837 |
|
| Other | 4,185 |
| | 3,287 |
| 7,126 |
| | 4,185 |
|
| Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 18,528 |
| | $ | 13,006 |
| $ | 19,577 |
| | $ | 18,528 |
|
As part of the Strategic Transformation, the Company announced the departure of its former chief executive officer once a permanent successor was identified. "Salaries and related expenses" at December 31, 2015 included $1.5 million of employee separation costs pursuant to the former chief executive officer's employment agreement, which were paid in April 2016.
The Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| | | | Unamortized | | | | | | Unamortized | | | | | Unamortized | | | | | | Unamortized | | |
| | Principal amount | | Discount | | Debt issuance costs | | Net carrying value | | Principal amount | | Discount | | Debt issuance costs | | Net carrying value | Principal amount | | Discount | | Debt issuance costs | | Net carrying value | | Principal amount | | Discount | | Debt issuance costs | | Net carrying value |
| Senior secured credit facility | | $ | 345,000 |
| | $ | (1,455 | ) | | $ | (5,464 | ) | | $ | 338,081 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility | $ | 260,000 |
| | $ | (7,124 | ) | | $ | (5,295 | ) | | $ | 247,581 |
| | $ | 400,000 |
| | $ | (12,000 | ) | | $ | (8,919 | ) | | $ | 379,081 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 260,000 |
| | (7,124 | ) | | (5,295 | ) | | 247,581 |
|
| Convertible Senior Notes | 172,859 |
| | (6,913 | ) | | (1,770 | ) | | 164,176 |
| | 201,250 |
| | (12,207 | ) | | (3,125 | ) | | 185,918 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 172,859 |
| | (6,913 | ) | | (1,770 | ) | | 164,176 |
|
| Note payable, related party | 3,200 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,200 |
| | 6,400 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,400 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,200 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,200 |
|
| Total debt | $ | 436,059 |
| | $ | (14,037 | ) | | $ | (7,065 | ) | | $ | 414,957 |
| | $ | 607,650 |
| | $ | (24,207 | ) | | $ | (12,044 | ) | | $ | 571,399 |
| $ | 345,000 |
| | $ | (1,455 | ) | | $ | (5,464 | ) | | $ | 338,081 |
| | $ | 436,059 |
| | $ | (14,037 | ) | | $ | (7,065 | ) | | $ | 414,957 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
Senior secured credit facility: In May 2017, Blucora entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders in order to (a) refinance the credit facilities previously entered into in 2015 to finance the HD Vest acquisition (the "TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility"), (b) redeem its Notes that were outstanding at the time, and (c) provide a term loan and revolving line of credit for future working capital, capital expenditure and general business purposes (the "Blucora senior secured credit facilities"). Consequently, the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility was repaid in full and the commitments thereunder were terminated. The Blucora senior secured credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $425.0 million consist of a committed $50.0 million revolving credit facility (including a letter of credit sub-facility), and a $375.0 million term loan facility, and mature in May 2022 and May 2024, respectively. Obligations under the Blucora senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by certain of Blucora's subsidiaries and secured by the assets of Blucora and those subsidiaries. The Blucora senior secured credit facilities include financial and operating covenants, including a consolidated total net leverage ratio, which are set forth in detail in the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2017, Blucora was in compliance with all of the financial and operating covenants.
Principal payments on the term loan are payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.25% of the initial outstanding principal. Under the initial term loan, the applicable interest rate margin was 3.75% for Eurodollar Rate loans and 2.75% for ABR loans. In November 2017, the Blucora senior secured credit facilities agreement was amended in order to refinance and reprice the initial term loan, such that the applicable interest rate margin is 3.0% for Eurodollar Rate loans and 2.0% for ABR loans. Through December 31, 2017, Blucora has made prepayments of $30.0 million towards the term loan.
Depending on Blucora’s Consolidated First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement), the applicable interest rate margin on the revolving credit facility is from 2.75% to 3.00% for Eurodollar Rate loans and 1.75% to 2.00% for ABR loans. Interest is payable at the end of each interest period. Blucora has not borrowed any amounts under the revolving credit facility.
Blucora also has the right to prepay the term loan or outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facility without any premium or penalty (other than customary Eurodollar breakage costs). Prepayments of the term loan are subject to certain prepayment minimums. Beginning with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, Blucora will be required to make annual prepayments of the term loan in an amount equal to a percentage of excess cash flow of Blucora during the applicable fiscal year from 0% to 50.0%, depending on the Consolidated First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) for such fiscal year.
As of December 31, 2017, the credit facility's principal amount approximated its fair value as it is a variable rate instrument and the current applicable margin approximates current market conditions.
In connection with the refinancing, the Company performed an analysis by creditor and determined that the refinancing qualified as an extinguishment of the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facilities and the Notes. As a result, the Company recognized a loss on debt extinguishment during the three months ended June 30, 2017, which was recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| Loss on debt extinguishment - TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility | $ | 9,593 |
|
| Loss on debt extinguishment - Convertible Senior Notes | 6,715 |
|
| Total loss on debt extinguishment | $ | 16,308 |
|
The amount for the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility included the write-off of the remaining unamortized discount and debt issuance costs. For the Notes, the Company allocated the cash paid first to the liability component of the Notes based on the fair value of the redeemed Notes. The fair value was based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the Notes' principal and related interest payments, using a discount rate that approximated the current market rate for similar debt without conversion rights. The difference between the fair value and net carrying value of the repurchased Notes was recognized as a loss and recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. No amount was allocated to the equity component of the Notes, since the fair value of the liability component exceeded the cash paid.
TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility:On December 31, 2015, TaxAct and HD Vest entered into an agreement with a syndicate of lenders for the purposes of financing the HD Vest acquisition and providing future working capital flexibility for TaxAct and HD Vest. The credit facility consistsconsisted of a $25.0 million revolving credit loan--which includesincluded a letter of credit and
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
swingline loans--and a $400.0 million term loan for an aggregate $425.0 million credit facility. The final maturity dates of the revolving credit loan and term loan arewere December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Obligations under the credit facility arewere guaranteed by TaxAct Holdings, Inc. and HD Vest Holdings, Inc. and arewere secured by the equity of the TaxAct and HD Vest businesses. While Blucora iswas not a party to the agreement, it hashad guaranteed the obligations of TaxAct and HD Vest under the credit facility, secured by its equity in TaxAct Holdings, Inc.
TaxAct and HD Vest borrowed $400.0 million under the term loan and had net repayment activity of $140.0 million in 2016. Principal payments on the term loan arewere payable quarterly and will bewere between 0.625% and 1.875% of outstanding principal, depending upon TaxAct and HD Vest's combined net leverage of EBITDA ratio. The interest rate on the term loan iswas variable at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), subject to a floor of 1.00%, plus a margin of 6.00%, payable at the end of each interest period.
TaxAct and HD Vest may borrow under the revolving credit loan in an aggregate principal amount not less than $2.0 million or any whole multiple of $1.0 million in excess thereof (for swingline loans, the aggregate principal amount is not less than $0.5 million or any whole multiple of $0.1 million in excess thereof). Principal payments on the revolving credit loan are payable at maturity. The interest rate on the revolving credit loan is variable, with initial draws at LIBOR plus a margin of 5.00%. Subsequent draws on the revolving credit loan also have variable interest rates, based upon LIBOR plus a margin of between 2.75% and 5.00%. In each case, the applicable margin within the range depends upon TaxAct and HD Vest's combined net leverage to EBITDA ratio over the previous four quarters. Interest is payable at the end of each interest period.
TaxAct and HD Vest have the right to permanently reduce, without premium or penalty, the entire credit facility at any time or portions of the credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not less than $5.0 million or any whole multiple of $1.0 million in excess thereof, except for prepayments through December 31, 2016 which carry a premium of 1.00% of the total principal amount outstanding just prior to prepayment. In accordance with this provision, TaxAct and HD Vest prepaid a portion of the credit facility in 2016, which was included in theCompany had repayment activity forof $64.0 million and $140.0 million during 2017 and 2016, andrespectively. These repayments resulted in the write-downacceleration of a portion of the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs. The write-down of the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs, waswhich were recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (see "Note 14: Other Loss, Net" for details).
The credit facility includes financial and operating covenants, including a net leverage to EBITDA ratio, which are defined further in the agreement. As of December 31, 2016, TaxAct and HD Vest were in compliance with all of the financial and operating covenants.
As of December 31, 2016, the credit facility's principal amount approximated its fair value as it is a variable rate instrument and the current applicable margin approximates current market conditions.income.
TaxAct 2013 credit facility: On August 30, 2013, TaxAct entered into an agreement to refinance a 2012 credit facility on more favorable terms. TaxAct had net repayment activity of $51.9 million and $19.4 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.2015. This credit facility was repaid in full in the second quarter of 2015 and subsequently closed, at which point the remaining debt issuance costs were written off. The write-off of the debt issuance costs was recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (see "Note 14: Other Loss, Net" for details).
Convertible Senior Notes: On March 15, 2013, the Company issued $201.25$201.3 million aggregate principal amount of its Convertible Senior Notes, (the “Notes”), inclusive of the underwriters’ exercise in full of their over-allotment option of $26.25$26.3 million. TheIn June 2017, the Company redeemed almost all of the outstanding Notes mature on April 1, 2019, unless earlier purchased, redeemed, or converted in accordancefor cash with proceeds from the terms, and bear interest at a rate of 4.25% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears beginning on October 1, 2013.senior secured credit facility. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $194.8 million after adjusting for debt issuance costs, including the underwriting discount.
The Notes were issued under an indenture dated March 15, 2013 (the “Indenture”) by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee. There arewere no financial or operating covenants relating to the Notes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
Beginning July 1, 2013 and prior to the close of business on September 28, 2018, holders may convert all or a portion of the Notes at their option, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, under the following circumstances:
During any fiscal quarter commencing July 1, 2013, if the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Notes were not convertible.
During the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sales price of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate on each trading day.
If the Company calls any or all of the Notes for redemption.
Upon the occurrence of specified corporate events, including a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.
The convertibility of the Notes is determined at the end of each reporting period. If the Notes are determined to be convertible, they remain convertible until the end of the subsequent quarter and are classified in "Current liabilities" on the balance sheet; otherwise, they are classified in "Long-term liabilities." Depending upon the price of the Company’s common stock or the trading price of the Notes within the reporting period, pursuant to the first two criteria listed above, the Notes could be convertible during one reporting period but not convertible during a comparable reporting period.
On or after October 1, 2018 and until the close of business on March 28, 2019, holders may convert their Notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, at the option of the holder.
The conversion ratio for the Notes is initially 0.0461723, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $21.66 per share of the Company’s common stock. The conversion ratio is subject to customary adjustment for certain events as described in the Indenture.
At the time the Company issued the Notes, the Company was only permitted to settle conversions with shares of its common stock. The Company received shareholder approval at its annual meeting in May 2013 to allow for “flexible settlement,” which provided the Company with the option to settle conversions in cash, shares of common stock, or any combination thereof. The Company’s intention is to satisfy conversion of the Notes with cash for the principal amount of the debt and shares of common stock for any related conversion premium. The Company expects to have the liquidity to satisfy conversion of the Notes' principal for cash based upon cash on hand, net cash flows from operations, and cash available through the credit facility.
Beginning April 6, 2016, the Company may, at its option, redeem for cash all or part of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the Company undergoes a fundamental change (as described in the Indenture), holders may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of their Notes in principal amounts of $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof. The fundamental change repurchase price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest. However, if a fundamental change occurs and a holder elects to convert the Notes, the Company will, under certain circumstances, increase the applicable conversion rate for the Notes surrendered for conversion by a number of additional shares of common stock based on the date on which the fundamental change occurs or becomes effective and the price paid per share of the Company’s common stock in the fundamental change as specified in the Indenture. The Strategic Transformation does not qualify as a fundamental change under the Indenture.
The Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the Company and rank senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes, and equal in right of payment to any of the Company’s existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not subordinated. The Notes are effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness (to the extent of the value of assets securing such indebtedness) and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Indenture does not limit the amount of debt that the Company or its subsidiaries may incur.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
The Notes may be settled in a combination of cash or shares of common stock given the flexible settlement option. As a result, the Notes contain liability and equity components, which were bifurcated and accounted for separately. The liability component of the Notes, as of the issuance date, was calculated by estimating the fair value of a similar liability issued at a 6.5% effective interest rate, which was determined by considering the rate of return investors would require in the Company’s debt structure. The amount of the equity component was calculated by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the Notes, resulting in the initial recognition of $22.3 million as the debt discount recorded in additional paid-in capital for the Notes. The carrying amount of the Notes is being accreted to the principal amount over the remaining term to maturity, and the Company is recording corresponding interest expense. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $6.4 million related to the Notes and allocated $5.7 million to the liability component of the Notes. These costs are being amortized to interest expense over the six-year term of the Notes or the date of conversion, if any.
During 2016, the Company repurchased $28.4 million of the Notes' principal for cash of $20.7 million. The Company allocated the cash paid first to the liability component of the Notes based on the fair value of the repurchased Notes. The fair value was based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the Notes' principal and related interest payments, using a discount rate that approximated the current market rate for similar debt without conversion rights. The difference between the fair value and net carrying value of the repurchased Notes was recognized as a gain, since the Notes were repurchased below par value, and recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (see "Note 14: Other Loss, Net" for details). No amount was allocated to the equity component of the Notes, since the fair value of the liability component exceeded the cash paid. The repurchase also resulted in the write-down of a portion of the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs, which was also recorded in "Other loss, net" on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The following table sets forth total interest expense related to the Notes (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Contractual interest expense (Cash) | $ | 7,619 |
| | $ | 8,553 |
| | $ | 8,553 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs (Non-cash) | 939 |
| | 989 |
| | 920 |
|
| Accretion of debt discount (Non-cash) | 3,666 |
| | 3,866 |
| | 3,594 |
|
| Total interest expense | $ | 12,224 |
| | $ | 13,408 |
| | $ | 13,067 |
|
| Effective interest rate of the liability component | 7.32 | % | | 7.32 | % | | 7.32 | % |
The fair value of the principal amount of the Notes as of December 31, 2016 was $172.6 million, based on the last quoted active trading price, a Level 1 fair value measurement, as of that date. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Contractual interest expense (Cash) | $ | 3,141 |
| | $ | 7,619 |
| | $ | 8,553 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs (Non-cash) | 401 |
| | 939 |
| | 989 |
|
| Accretion of debt discount (Non-cash) | 1,567 |
| | 3,666 |
| | 3,866 |
|
| Total interest expense | $ | 5,109 |
| | $ | 12,224 |
| | $ | 13,408 |
|
| Effective interest rate of the liability component | 7.32 | % | | 7.32 | % | | 7.32 | % |
Note payable, related party: TheIn December 2017, the Company fully repaid $3.2 million of a note payable is with the former President of HD Vest andthat arose in connection with the acquisition of HD Vest. The note was scheduled to be paid over a three-
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
year period, with 50% paid in year one ($3.2 million paid in December 2016), 40% to be paid in 2017, and 10% to be paid in 2018. Certain members of HD Vest management rolled over a portion of the proceeds they would have otherwise received at the acquisition's closing into shares of the acquisition subsidiary through which the Company consummated the purchase of HD Vest. The former President of HD Vest sold a portion of his shares to the Company in exchange for the note. See "Note 3: Business Combinations" for additional information on the acquisition of HD Vest. The note will be paid over a three-year period, with 50% paid in year one ($3.2 million paid in December 2016), 40% paid in year two, and 10% paid in year three. The note bearsbore interest at a rate of 5% per year, with a principal amount that approximates its fair value.year.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
|
|
| Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company's contractual commitments are as follows for years ending December 31 (in thousands):
| | | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | Thereafter | | Total | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Operating lease commitments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating lease obligations | $ | 3,948 |
| | $ | 4,028 |
| | $ | 4,108 |
| | $ | 3,797 |
| | $ | 2,441 |
| | $ | 3,657 |
| | $ | 21,979 |
| $ | 4,201 |
| | $ | 4,281 |
| | $ | 3,946 |
| | $ | 2,493 |
| | $ | 1,979 |
| | $ | 1,678 |
| | $ | 18,578 |
|
| Sublease income | (770 | ) | | (793 | ) | | (815 | ) | | (624 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,002 | ) | (1,265 | ) | | (1,288 | ) | | (991 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,544 | ) |
| Net operating lease commitments | 3,178 |
| | 3,235 |
| | 3,293 |
| | 3,173 |
| | 2,441 |
| | 3,657 |
| | 18,977 |
| 2,936 |
| | 2,993 |
| | 2,955 |
| | 2,493 |
| | 1,979 |
| | 1,678 |
| | 15,034 |
|
| Purchase commitments | 3,174 |
| | 2,703 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,877 |
| 5,528 |
| | 3,600 |
| | 3,600 |
| | 2,100 |
| | 600 |
| | 3,400 |
| | 18,828 |
|
| Debt commitments | 2,560 |
| | 640 |
| | 172,859 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 260,000 |
| | 436,059 |
| — |
| | 2,000 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 3,500 |
| | 332,500 |
| | 345,000 |
|
| Interest on Notes | 7,347 |
| | 7,347 |
| | 3,673 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,367 |
| |
| Interest payable | | 15,172 |
| | 15,157 |
| | 15,068 |
| | 14,872 |
| | 14,719 |
| | 20,584 |
| | 95,572 |
|
| Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability | 872 |
| | 1,129 |
| | 1,420 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,421 |
| 1,304 |
| | 1,385 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,689 |
|
| Total | $ | 17,131 |
| | $ | 15,054 |
| | $ | 181,245 |
| | $ | 3,173 |
| | $ | 2,441 |
| | $ | 263,657 |
| | $ | 482,701 |
| $ | 24,940 |
| | $ | 25,135 |
| | $ | 25,123 |
| | $ | 22,965 |
| | $ | 20,798 |
| | $ | 358,162 |
| | $ | 477,123 |
|
Operating lease commitments: TheAs discussed in "Note 5: Restructuring", the Company has a non-cancelable operating leaseslease that runs through 2020 for its facilities. The leases run through 2023, and some of the leases have clauses for optional renewal. In connection with the sale of the Search and Content business as discussedformer corporate headquarters in "Note 4: Discontinued Operations,"Bellevue, Washington, which the Company is subleasingoccupied until May 2017. In March 2017, the Company agreed to InfoSpacea sublease for the office space that InfoSpace is using currently. The rent paymentsentire Bellevue facility, which was effective June 1, 2017 and expires on September 30, 2020, termination date are consistent with the underlying non-cancelable operating lease.
The Company leases office space, and these leases are classified as operating leases. Net rent expense under those operating leases was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Rent expense | $ | 3,793 |
| | $ | 1,237 |
| | $ | 1,179 |
|
| Less: sublease rent income | (342 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net rent expense | $ | 3,451 |
| | $ | 1,237 |
| | $ | 1,179 |
|
The non-cancelable operating lease for the Bellevue facility could be impacted by the corporate headquarters relocation announcement. See "Note 5: Restructuring" for additional information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Rent expense | $ | 2,972 |
| | $ | 3,793 |
| | $ | 1,237 |
|
| Less: sublease rent income | (594 | ) | | (342 | ) | | — |
|
| Net rent expense | $ | 2,378 |
| | $ | 3,451 |
| | $ | 1,237 |
|
Purchase commitments: The Company's purchase commitments consist primarily of non-cancelable service agreements for its data centers, and a sponsorship marketing agreement.agreement, commitments with a vendor to provide cloud computation services of $10.1 million over the next four years, and a commitment to switch to a new clearing firm provider that has been selected by the Company by the third quarter of 2018.
Debt commitments and interest on Notes: The Company’s debt commitments are based upon contractual payment terms and consist of the outstanding principal related to the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015Blucora senior secured credit facility, the Notes, and the note payable with related party. The Company may repay the amounts outstanding under the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility before its maturity date, depending upon the cash generated by the businesses, and under the Notes based upon holders exercising their conversion option.facility. For further detail regarding the credit facility, the Notes, and the note payable with related party, see "Note 9: Debt."
Acquisition-related contingent consideration liability: The contingent consideration liability is related to the Company's acquisition of SimpleTax (see "Note 3: Business Combinations" and "Note 7: Fair Value Measurements"), and the related payments that began in 2017 and are expected to occurcontinue annually beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2019.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Collateral pledged: The Company has pledged a portion of its cash as collateral for certain of its property lease-related banking arrangements. At December 31, 2016,2017, the total amount of collateral pledged under these standby letters of credit was $0.8$0.7 million.
Off-balance sheet arrangements: The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
Litigation: From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings or claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues a liability when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Following is a brief description of the more significant legal proceedings. Although the Company believes that resolving such claims, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial statements, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties.
On March 5, 2015, Remigius Shatas filedDecember 12, 2016, a shareholder derivative action was filed by Jeffrey Tilden against the Company, as a nominal defendant, Andrew Snyder, who was a director of the Company at that time, certain companies affiliated with Mr. Snyder, as well as nominal defendant Blucora, in the Superior Courta former officer of the State of Washington in and for King County. Although the Company, is a nominal defendant, the plaintiff purports to bring the action on behalf of the Company and thus does not seek monetary damages from the Company. Instead, the plaintiff alleges improper use of inside information in certain sales of the Company's common stock and seeks to recover from Andrew Snyder and those companies affiliated with Mr. Snyder profits resulting from those allegedly improper sales. On May 15, 2015, the Superior Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss the Complaint based on the plaintiffs’ failure to file this matter in the proper court. Subsequently, the plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Superior Court's decision to grant the motion to dismiss, and on June 5, 2015, that motion for reconsideration was denied.
On June 30, 2015, the plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal with the Superior Court, indicating plaintiff's intention to appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals, Division I. After appellate briefing and oral argument, on October 17, 2016, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion reversing the Superior Court’s decision and remanding for further proceedings. The Court of Appeals stated that the record was not sufficiently developed to allow for consideration of the Company’s alternate grounds for affirmance or its argument that the plaintiff lacked standing. The Court of Appeals indicated that the parties could litigate those issues on remand.
On December 12, 2016, Jeffrey I. Tilden, the attorney for Mr. Shatas in the Washington action, filed a shareholder derivative action on his own behalf against the same defendants named in the Washington suit, as well as George Allen, GCA Savvian Advisors, LLC ("GCA Savvian"), and certain other current and former members of the Blucora Board of Directors, in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Francisco. The complaint asserts the same claims alleged in the Shatas action, as well asasserted claims for breaches of fiduciary duty against certain current and former directors of the Company related to the Company’s share repurchases and the Company’s acquisitions of HD Vest and Monoprice. The complaint also assertsasserted a claim against GCA Savvian, the Company’s financial advisor in connection with the HD Vest acquisition, for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary associatedduty. The complaint also asserted a claim for insider trading against Mr. Snyder, a former director of the Company, and certain companies affiliated with the acquisitions. As with the Shatas action, the CaliforniaMr. Snyder. The derivative action doesdid not seek monetary damages from the Company. The complaint seekssought corporate governance reforms, declaratory relief, monetary damages from the other defendants, attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest.
On March 10, 2017, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue as a result of a forum selection provision in the Company’s bylaws that required the plaintiff to file his derivative fiduciary duty claims in Delaware. Other defendants also filed motions to quash the summons due to a lack of personal jurisdiction over them. On July 25, 2017, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss. The case was stayed by the Court until November 22, 2017 so that Tilden could file a complaint in Delaware, after which the case was dismissed without further order of the Court.
On November 21, 2017, Tilden filed a shareholder derivative action in the Delaware Court of Chancery asserting the same claims against the same defendants and seeking the same relief as the San Francisco Superior Court lawsuit. On January 31, 2018, Blucora filed a motion to dismiss the Delaware complaint and the court has not yet ruled on this motion.
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business with its officers and directors, and the agreement entered into with GCA Savvian in connection with the acquisition of HD Vest also contained indemnification provisions. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company may be obligated to advance payment of legal fees and costs incurred by the defendants pursuant to the Company’s obligations under these indemnification agreements and applicable Delaware law.
|
|
| Note 11: Stockholders' Equity |
Stock incentive plan: The Company may grant incentive or non-qualified stock options, stock, restricted stock, RSUs, and stock appreciation rights and performance shares or performance units to employees, non-employee directors, and consultants.
The Company granted options and RSUs during 20162017 and 20152016 under its 2015 Incentive Plan (as amended and restated), as well as options and RSUs during 2016 under its 2016 Inducement Plan. The Company granted options and RSUs during 2015 and 2014 under its Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan. Options and RSUs generally vest over a period of three years, with one-third vesting one year from the date of grant and the remainder vesting ratably thereafter on a semi-annual basis, and expire seven years from the date of grant. There are a few exceptions to this vesting schedule, which provide for vesting at different rates or based on achievement of performance targets.
The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of options and upon the vesting of RSUs. If an option or RSU is surrendered or otherwise unused, the related shares will continue to be available.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: The 1998 and 2016 Employee Stock Purchase PlansPlan (“ESPP”) permitpermits eligible employees to contribute up to 15% of their base earnings toward the twice-yearly purchase of Company common stock, subject
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
to an annual maximum dollar amount. The purchase price is the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of common stock on the first day or on the last day of an offering period. An aggregate of 2.41.0 million shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under the ESPP. Of this amount, 1.00.9 million shares were available for issuance as of December 31, 2016.2017. The Company issues new shares upon purchase through the ESPP.
Stock repurchase program: In February 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program whereby the Company could purchase its common stock in open-market transactions. The repurchase period concluded in May 2016. Repurchased shares were retired and resumed the status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock. The Company had the following open-market share purchase activity, exclusive of purchase and administrative costs (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Cost | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Cost |
| Year ended December 31, 2017 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2016 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2015 | 551 |
| | $ | 14.01 |
| | $ | 7,713 |
| 551 |
| | $ | 14.01 |
| | $ | 7,713 |
|
| Year ended December 31, 2014 | 2,289 |
| | $ | 16.85 |
| | $ | 38,558 |
| |
Other comprehensive income: The following table provides information about activity in other comprehensive income (in thousands):
| | | | Unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | Foreign currency translation adjustment | | Total | Unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | Foreign currency translation adjustment | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Other comprehensive loss | (1,113 | ) | | — |
| | (1,113 | ) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | (1,113 | ) | | — |
| | (1,113 | ) | $ | (1,113 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,113 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 1,103 |
| | (517 | ) | | 586 |
| 1,103 |
| | (517 | ) | | 586 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | (10 | ) | | (517 | ) | | (527 | ) | (10 | ) | | (517 | ) | | (527 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income | 9 |
| | 137 |
| | 146 |
| 9 |
| | 137 |
| | 146 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (380 | ) | | $ | (381 | ) | (1 | ) | | (380 | ) | | (381 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income | | 1 |
| | 376 |
| | 377 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | — |
| | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) |
|
|
| Note 12: Stock-Based Compensation |
A summary of the general terms of stock options and RSUs at December 31, 20162017 was as follows:
|
| | |
| Number of shares authorized for awards | 16,884,36811,333,964 |
|
| Options and RSUs outstanding | 10,141,0124,720,099 |
|
| Options and RSUs expected to vest | 8,698,1374,347,251 |
|
| Options and RSUs available for grant | 5,547,3305,160,506 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
The following activity occurred under the Company’s stock incentive plans:
| |
| Options |
| Weighted average exercise price |
| Intrinsic value
(in thousands) |
| Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | Options |
| Weighted average exercise price |
| Intrinsic value
(in thousands) |
| Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) |
| Stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Outstanding December 31, 2015 | 5,395,760 |
| | $ | 13.87 |
| |
| |
| |
| Outstanding December 31, 2016 | | 8,635,815 |
| | $ | 11.21 |
| |
| |
|
| Granted | 4,955,954 |
| | $ | 8.59 |
| |
| |
| 1,474,266 |
| | $ | 16.87 |
| |
| |
|
| Forfeited | (908,061 | ) | | $ | 11.65 |
| |
| |
| (1,233,344 | ) | | $ | 9.94 |
| |
| |
|
| Expired | (484,228 | ) | | $ | 14.37 |
| |
| |
| (197,957 | ) | | $ | 19.71 |
| |
| |
|
| Exercised | (292,210 | ) | | $ | 9.40 |
| |
| |
| (4,872,858 | ) | | $ | 11.41 |
| |
| |
|
| Outstanding December 31, 2016 | 8,667,215 |
| | $ | 11.21 |
| | $ | 37,459 |
| | 3.4 | |
| Exercisable December 31, 2016 | 3,907,632 |
| | $ | 13.71 |
| | $ | 10,484 |
| | 2.0 | |
| Vested and expected to vest after December 31, 2016 | 7,477,947 |
| | $ | 11.49 |
| | $ | 31,081 |
| | 3.6 | |
| Outstanding December 31, 2017 | | 3,805,922 |
| | $ | 13.13 |
| | $ | 35,855 |
| | 5.2 |
| Exercisable December 31, 2017 | | 1,225,062 |
| | $ | 13.37 |
| | $ | 12,389 |
| | 4.1 |
| Vested and expected to vest after December 31, 2017 | | 3,538,301 |
| | $ | 13.17 |
| | $ | 33,301 |
| | 5.2 |
| |
| Stock units |
| Weighted average grant date fair value |
| Intrinsic value
(in thousands) |
| Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) | Stock units |
| Weighted average grant date fair value |
| Intrinsic value
(in thousands) |
| Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) |
| RSUs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Outstanding December 31, 2015 | 1,008,099 |
| | $ | 14.73 |
| |
| |
| |
| Outstanding December 31, 2016 | | 1,473,797 |
| | $ | 8.45 |
| |
| |
|
| Granted | 1,578,424 |
| | $ | 7.82 |
| |
| |
| 373,529 |
| | $ | 18.39 |
| |
| |
|
| Forfeited | (448,465 | ) | | $ | 12.79 |
| |
| |
| (169,202 | ) | | $ | 10.34 |
| |
| |
|
| Vested | (664,261 | ) | | $ | 13.52 |
| |
| |
| (763,947 | ) | | $ | 8.43 |
| |
| |
|
| Outstanding December 31, 2016 | 1,473,797 |
| | $ | 8.45 |
| | $ | 21,739 |
| | 0.9 | |
| Expected to vest after December 31, 2016 | 1,220,190 |
| | $ | 8.46 |
| | $ | 17,998 |
| | 0.9 | |
| Outstanding December 31, 2017 | | 914,177 |
| | $ | 12.10 |
| | $ | 20,205 |
| | 0.8 |
| Expected to vest after December 31, 2017 | | 808,950 |
| | $ | 12.00 |
| | $ | 17,878 |
| | 0.8 |
Supplemental information is presented below:
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Stock options: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average grant date fair value per share granted | $ | 2.46 |
| | $ | 3.65 |
| | $ | 5.67 |
| $ | 6.25 |
| | $ | 2.46 |
| | $ | 3.65 |
|
| Total intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands) | $ | 437 |
| | $ | 1,072 |
| | $ | 3,600 |
| $ | 44,405 |
| | $ | 437 |
| | $ | 1,072 |
|
| Total fair value of options vested (in thousands) | $ | 7,064 |
| | $ | 4,416 |
| | $ | 4,000 |
| $ | 5,566 |
| | $ | 7,064 |
| | $ | 4,416 |
|
| RSUs: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average grant date fair value per unit granted | $ | 7.82 |
| | $ | 13.67 |
| | $ | 18.44 |
| $ | 18.39 |
| | $ | 7.82 |
| | $ | 13.67 |
|
| Total intrinsic value of units vested (in thousands) | $ | 5,755 |
| | $ | 5,437 |
| | $ | 8,315 |
| $ | 14,642 |
| | $ | 5,755 |
| | $ | 5,437 |
|
| Total fair value of units vested (in thousands) | $ | 8,981 |
| | $ | 6,742 |
| | $ | 6,560 |
| $ | 6,469 |
| | $ | 8,981 |
| | $ | 6,742 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
The Company included the following amounts for stock-based compensation expense, which related to stock options, RSUs, and the ESPP, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Cost of revenue | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 96 |
| | $ | 254 |
| $ | 774 |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 96 |
|
| Engineering and technology | 1,640 |
| | 484 |
| | 516 |
| 984 |
| | 1,640 |
| | 484 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 2,548 |
| | 771 |
| | 829 |
| 2,376 |
| | 2,548 |
| | 771 |
|
| General and administrative | 9,774 |
| | 7,343 |
| | 7,095 |
| 7,519 |
| | 9,774 |
| | 7,343 |
|
| Restructuring | (364 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| 1,148 |
| | (364 | ) | | — |
|
| Total in continuing operations | 13,764 |
| | 8,694 |
| | 8,694 |
| 12,801 |
| | 13,764 |
| | 8,694 |
|
| Discontinued operations | 1,471 |
| | 4,402 |
| | 3,190 |
| — |
| | 1,471 |
| | 4,402 |
|
| Total | $ | 15,235 |
| | $ | 13,096 |
| | $ | 11,884 |
| $ | 12,801 |
| | $ | 15,235 |
| | $ | 13,096 |
|
| Total excluded and capitalized as part of internal-use software | $ | — |
| | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 106 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 135 |
|
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in connection with the corporate headquarters relocation announcement. See "Note 5: Restructuring" for additional information.
In May 2012, the Company granted stock options to certain Blucora employees who performed acquisition-related services. The vesting of such options were predicated on completing “qualified acquisitions” under the terms of the options. The completion of the HSW acquisition on May 30, 2014 constituted a qualified acquisition under such terms, resulting in a charge of $0.3 million to stock-based compensation expense (reflected in "General and administrative" expense) in 2014.
To estimate stock-based compensation expense, the Company used the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation method with the following assumptions for stock options granted:
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.83% - 1.59% |
| | 0.21% - 1.33% |
| | 0.11% - 1.31% |
| 1.2% - 1.94% |
| | 0.83% - 1.59% |
| | 0.21% - 1.33% |
|
| Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % |
| Expected volatility | 35% - 45% |
| | 34% - 40% |
| | 35% - 43% |
| 39% - 45% |
| | 35% - 45% |
| | 34% - 40% |
|
| Expected life | 3.4 years |
| | 3.0 years |
| | 3.0 years |
| 3.8 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 3.0 |
|
The risk-free interest rate was based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term. The Company last paid a dividend in 2008 but does not expect to pay recurring dividends.2008. The expected volatility was based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock for the related expected life of the award. The expected life of the award was based on historical experience, including historical post-vesting termination behavior.
As of December 31, 2016,2017, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock awards is as follows:
| | | | Expense (in thousands) | | Weighted average period over which to be recognized (in years) | Expense (in thousands) | | Weighted average period over which to be recognized (in years) |
| Stock options | $ | 3,818 |
| | 1.2 | $ | 5,569 |
| | 1.9 |
| RSUs | 4,737 |
| | 1.2 | 4,016 |
| | 1.2 |
| Total for continuing operations | $ | 8,555 |
| | 1.2 | $ | 9,585 |
| | 1.6 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
|
|
| Note 13: Segment Information |
The Company has two reportable segments: the Wealth Management segment and the Tax Preparation segment. The Wealth Management segment consists of the HD Vest business, which was acquired on December 31, 2015. HD Vest is included in Blucora's results of operations beginning on January 1, 2016. The Tax Preparation segment consists of the TaxAct business. As a result of the Strategic Transformation and the 2016 divestitures of the Search and Content and E-Commerce segments, those former segments are included in discontinued operations.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
The Company’s chief executive officer is its chief operating decision maker and reviews financial information presented on a disaggregated basis. This information is used for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance.
The Company does not allocate certain general and administrative costs (including personnel and overhead costs), stock-based compensation, depreciation, and amortization of intangible assets to the reportable segments. Such amounts are reflected in the table under the heading "Corporate-level activity." In addition, the Company does not allocate other loss, net and income taxes to the reportable segments. The Company does not account for, and does not report to management, its assets or capital expenditures by segment other than goodwill and intangible assets used for impairment analysis purposes.
Information on the reportable segments currently presented to the Company’s chief operating decision maker and a reconciliation to consolidated net income are presented below (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| 2015 | | 2014 |
| Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wealth Management | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Tax Preparation | 139,365 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
|
| Total revenue | 455,911 |
| | 117,708 |
| | 103,719 |
|
| Operating income (loss): | | | | | |
| Wealth Management | 46,296 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Tax Preparation | 66,897 |
| | 56,984 |
| | 49,696 |
|
| Corporate-level activity | (76,076 | ) | | (61,791 | ) | | (45,093 | ) |
| Total operating income (loss) | 37,117 |
| | (4,807 | ) | | 4,603 |
|
| Other loss, net | (39,781 | ) | | (12,542 | ) | | (13,489 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | 1,285 |
| | 4,623 |
| | 3,342 |
|
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) | | (30,003 | ) |
| Net loss | $ | (64,500 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
| Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wealth Management | $ | 348,620 |
| | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Tax Preparation | 160,937 |
| | 139,365 |
| | 117,708 |
|
| Total revenue | 509,557 |
| | 455,911 |
| | 117,708 |
|
| Operating income (loss): | | | | | |
| Wealth Management | 50,916 |
| | 46,296 |
| | — |
|
| Tax Preparation | 72,921 |
| | 66,897 |
| | 56,984 |
|
| Corporate-level activity | (75,800 | ) | | (76,076 | ) | | (61,791 | ) |
| Total operating income (loss) | 48,037 |
| | 37,117 |
| | (4,807 | ) |
| Other loss, net | (44,551 | ) | | (39,781 | ) | | (12,542 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | 25,890 |
| | 1,285 |
| | 4,623 |
|
| Discontinued operations, net of income taxes | — |
| | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 29,376 |
| | $ | (64,500 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
Revenues by major category within each segment are presented below (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Wealth Management: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commission | $ | 150,125 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 160,241 |
| | $ | 150,125 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Advisory | 129,417 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 145,694 |
| | 129,417 |
| | — |
|
| Asset-based | 22,653 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 26,297 |
| | 22,653 |
| | — |
|
| Transaction and fee | 14,351 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 16,388 |
| | 14,351 |
| | — |
|
| Total Wealth Management revenue | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 348,620 |
| | $ | 316,546 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Tax Preparation: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer | $ | 126,289 |
| | $ | 105,367 |
| | $ | 93,097 |
| $ | 147,084 |
| | $ | 126,289 |
| | $ | 105,367 |
|
| Professional | 13,076 |
| | 12,341 |
| | 10,622 |
| 13,853 |
| | 13,076 |
| | 12,341 |
|
| Total Tax Preparation revenue | $ | 139,365 |
| | $ | 117,708 |
| | $ | 103,719 |
| $ | 160,937 |
| | $ | 139,365 |
| | $ | 117,708 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
"Other loss, net" consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Interest income | $ | (81 | ) | | $ | (609 | ) | | $ | (355 | ) | $ | (110 | ) | | $ | (81 | ) | | $ | (609 | ) |
| Interest expense (see Note 9) | 32,424 |
| | 9,044 |
| | 9,476 |
| |
| Amortization of debt issuance costs (see Note 9) | 1,840 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 1,059 |
| |
| Accretion of debt discounts (see Note 9) | 4,690 |
| | 3,866 |
| | 3,594 |
| |
| Interest expense | | 21,211 |
| | 32,424 |
| | 9,044 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | | 1,089 |
| | 1,840 |
| | 1,133 |
|
| Accretion of debt discounts | | 1,947 |
| | 4,690 |
| | 3,866 |
|
| Loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense (see Note 9 and next table) | 1,036 |
| | 398 |
| | — |
| 20,445 |
| | 1,036 |
| | 398 |
|
| Gain on third party bankruptcy settlement | (172 | ) | | (1,128 | ) | | (286 | ) | (116 | ) | | (172 | ) | | (1,128 | ) |
| Other | 44 |
| | (162 | ) | | 1 |
| 85 |
| | 44 |
| | (162 | ) |
| Other loss, net | $ | 39,781 |
| | $ | 12,542 |
| | $ | 13,489 |
| $ | 44,551 |
| | $ | 39,781 |
| | $ | 12,542 |
|
The gain on third party bankruptcy settlement related to amounts received in connection with ongoing distributions from the Lehman Brothers estate, of which the Company is a creditor.
As discussed in Note 9: Debt, the Company repurchased some of the Notes and prepaid a portion of the TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility in 2016. In addition, the Company repaid the TaxAct 2013 credit facility in full in 2015 and subsequently closed it. This activity resulted in the following amounts recorded to loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Gain on Convertible Senior Notes repurchased | $ | (7,724 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on Convertible Senior Notes | 1,628 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs on Convertible Senior Notes | 416 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount and amortization of debt issuance costs on TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility | 6,716 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of debt issuance costs on TaxAct 2013 credit facility | — |
| | 398 |
| | — |
|
| Loss on debt extinguishment and modification expense | $ | 1,036 |
| | $ | 398 |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on TaxAct - HD Vest 2015 credit facility (related to closure) | $ | 9,593 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Write-off of debt discount and debt issuance costs on the Notes (related to termination) | 6,715 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount and amortization of debt issuance costs on credit facilities (related to prepayments) | 2,990 |
| | 6,716 |
| | — |
|
| Gain on the Notes repurchased | — |
| | (7,724 | ) | | — |
|
| Accelerated accretion of debt discount on the Notes (related to repurchase) | — |
| | 1,628 |
| | — |
|
| Accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs on the Notes (related to repurchase) | 1,147 |
| | 416 |
| | 398 |
|
| Total loss on debt extinguishment | $ | 20,445 |
| | $ | 1,036 |
| | $ | 398 |
|
Note 15: 401(k) Plan
The Company has a 401(k) savings plan covering its employees. Eligible employees may contribute through payroll deductions. The Company may match the employees’ 401(k) contributions at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to a continuing resolution, the Company has matched a portion of the 401(k) contributions made by its employees. The amount contributed by the Company ranges from 1% to 4% of an employee's salary, depending upon the percentage contributed by the employee. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company contributed $1.6 million, $1.4 million, and $0.6 million, respectively, for employees, with the increase in 2016 due to the acquisition of HD Vest on December 31, 2015.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
Income tax benefit consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 | 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| Current: | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. federal | $ | 14,695 |
| | $ | 7,470 |
| | $ | 6,306 |
| $ | 123 |
| | $ | 14,695 |
| | $ | 7,470 |
|
| State | 2,048 |
| | 514 |
| | 210 |
| 962 |
| | 2,048 |
| | 514 |
|
| Foreign | 27 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 122 |
| | 27 |
| | — |
|
| Total current expense | 16,770 |
| | 7,984 |
| | 6,516 |
| 1,207 |
| | 16,770 |
| | 7,984 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. federal | (16,608 | ) | | (12,004 | ) | | (9,800 | ) | (26,012 | ) | | (16,608 | ) | | (12,004 | ) |
| State | (1,421 | ) | | (538 | ) | | (58 | ) | (1,022 | ) | | (1,421 | ) | | (538 | ) |
| Foreign | (26 | ) | | (65 | ) | | — |
| (63 | ) | | (26 | ) | | (65 | ) |
| Total deferred benefit | (18,055 | ) | | (12,607 | ) | | (9,858 | ) | (27,097 | ) | | (18,055 | ) | | (12,607 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | $ | (1,285 | ) | | $ | (4,623 | ) | | $ | (3,342 | ) | $ | (25,890 | ) | | $ | (1,285 | ) | | $ | (4,623 | ) |
Income tax benefit differed from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
| Income tax benefit at the statutory federal income tax rate | $ | (930 | ) | | $ | (6,072 | ) | | $ | (3,110 | ) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) at the statutory federal income tax rate | | $ | 1,220 |
| | $ | (930 | ) | | $ | (6,072 | ) |
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 454 |
| | (15 | ) | | 99 |
| 582 |
| | 454 |
| | (15 | ) |
| Deductible domestic manufacturing costs | (1,225 | ) | | (787 | ) | | (594 | ) | — |
| | (1,225 | ) | | (787 | ) |
| Non-deductible compensation | 249 |
| | 27 |
| | 569 |
| 283 |
| | 249 |
| | 27 |
|
| Non-deductible acquisition-related transaction costs (see Note 3) | 37 |
| | 2,524 |
| | — |
| |
| Non-deductible acquisition-related transaction costs | | — |
| | 37 |
| | 2,524 |
|
| Tax Legislation impact | | (21,430 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Excess tax benefit due to stock-based compensation | | (11,558 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Change in liabilities for uncertain tax positions | (86 | ) | | — |
| | (72 | ) | (321 | ) | | (86 | ) | | — |
|
| Change in valuation allowance on unrealized capital losses | 15 |
| | (223 | ) | | (117 | ) | |
| Change in valuation allowance | | 4,974 |
| | 15 |
| | (223 | ) |
| Other | 201 |
| | (77 | ) | | (117 | ) | 360 |
| | 201 |
| | (77 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | $ | (1,285 | ) | | $ | (4,623 | ) | | $ | (3,342 | ) | $ | (25,890 | ) | | $ | (1,285 | ) | | $ | (4,623 | ) |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015
The tax effect of temporary differences and net operating loss carryforwards that gave rise to the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2016 |
| 2015 | 2017 |
| 2016 |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 176,722 |
| | $ | 182,599 |
| $ | 111,416 |
| | $ | 176,722 |
|
| Accrued compensation | 12,069 |
| | 12,519 |
| 4,586 |
| | 12,069 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 3,740 |
| | 3,845 |
| 1,638 |
| | 3,740 |
|
| Tax credit carryforwards | 10,925 |
| | 10,797 |
| — |
| | 10,925 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 9,689 |
| | 8,416 |
| 3,592 |
| | 9,689 |
|
| Capital loss | 37,680 |
| | 498 |
| 22,579 |
| | 37,680 |
|
| Basis difference in discontinued E-Commerce business | — |
| | 33,871 |
| |
| Other, net | 5,798 |
| | 6,222 |
| 3,466 |
| | 5,798 |
|
| Total gross deferred tax assets | 256,623 |
| | 258,767 |
| 147,277 |
| | 256,623 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (226,813 | ) | | (217,452 | ) | (109,242 | ) | | (226,813 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | 29,810 |
| | 41,315 |
| 38,035 |
| | 29,810 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (138,034 | ) | | (140,035 | ) | (81,182 | ) | | (138,034 | ) |
| Discount on Notes | (2,385 | ) | | (4,422 | ) | — |
| | (2,385 | ) |
| Other, net | (517 | ) | | (378 | ) | (286 | ) | | (517 | ) |
| Total gross deferred tax liabilities | (140,936 | ) | | (144,835 | ) | (81,468 | ) | | (140,936 | ) |
| Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | (111,126 | ) | | $ | (103,520 | ) | $ | (43,433 | ) | | $ | (111,126 | ) |
At December 31, 2016,2017, the Company evaluated the need for a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets based upon its assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income necessary to realize the deferred tax benefits. The Company maintains a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets that are capital in nature to the extent that it is more likely than not that the related deferred tax benefit will not be realized. The Company also has a deferred tax asset related to the net operating losses ("NOLs") that it believes are more likely than not to expire before utilization. If assumptions change and the Company determines it will be able to realize these NOLs, the tax benefit relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets relatedas of December 31, 2017 will be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense.
On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed into law "H.R. 1", formerly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Legislation"). The Tax Legislation, which was effective January 1, 2018, significantly revised the U.S. tax code by, among other things, lowering the corporate income tax rate from 35% to net operating losses that arose from excess21%. At December 31, 2017, the Company has not completed its accounting for the tax benefits for stock-based compensationeffects of the Tax Legislation; however, in certain cases, as described below, we have made a reasonable estimate of the effects on the Company’s existing deferred tax balances and minimum tax credits that arose from the corresponding alternative minimum tax paidone-time transition tax. In other cases, the Company has not been able to make a reasonable estimate and continues to account for those excessitems based on its existing accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes, and the provisions of the tax benefits. Through December 31, 2016,laws that were in effect immediately prior to enactment. For the items for which the Company appliedwas able to determine a valuation allowance against these equity-basedreasonable estimate, the Company recognized a provisional amount of approximately $21.4 million, which is recorded as additional income tax benefit in 2017. In all cases, the Company will continue to make and refine its calculations as additional analysis is completed. In addition, the Company’s estimates may also be affected as it gains a more thorough understanding of the tax law.
Provisional amounts: The Company remeasured certain deferred tax assets untiland liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. However, the Company utilizedis still analyzing certain aspects of the Tax Legislation and refining its calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax assetsamounts. The provisional amounts recorded related to reduce taxes payable, and, accordingly, the Company did not consider theseremeasurement of the Company’s net deferred tax assets when evaluating changes in the valuation allowance.liabilities was approximately $21.4 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
The changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets are shown below (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 217,452 |
| | $ | 211,865 |
| $ | 226,813 |
| | $ | 217,452 |
|
| Net changes to deferred tax assets, subject to a valuation allowance | 9,361 |
| | 5,587 |
| |
| Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance - capital items | | (15,980 | ) | | 14,926 |
|
| Decrease in valuation allowance - utilization of equity-based deferred tax assets | | (101,830 | ) | | (5,684 | ) |
| Increase in valuation allowance - other | | 239 |
| | 119 |
|
| Balance at end of year | $ | 226,813 |
| | $ | 217,452 |
| $ | 109,242 |
| | $ | 226,813 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the decrease in valuation allowance for capital items related primarily to the enactment of a change in the federal tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The decrease in valuation allowance for utilization of equity-based deferred tax assets related primarily to the enactment of a change in the federal tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, a $50.2 million decrease related to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, which required a cumulative-effect adjustment for historical equity net operation losses (see Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional details) and a $0.4 million adjustment related to the future taxable income expected to be available to partially utilize the carryforwards, offset by a $5.6 million increase related to the current year generation of NOLs.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, the valuation allowance change included increasesan increase of $14.9 million and $22.1 million, respectively, for changesincreases in deferred tax assets that were capital in nature, and decreasesa decrease of $5.7 million and $16.7 million, respectively, for the utilization of equity-based deferred tax assets to reduce taxes payable. As of December 31, 2016, $186.7 million of the valuation allowance pertained to equity-based deferred tax assets. Through December 31, 2016, the consolidated balance sheets reflected an increase in equity upon the release of this valuation allowance, and, accordingly, income tax expense did not reflect a benefit for the release of this valuation allowance.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
As of December 31, 2016,2017, the Company’s U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were $504.0$520.3 million and $30.8$32.7 million, respectively, which primarily related to excess tax benefits for stock-based compensation. Prior to January 1, 2017, when the net operating loss carryforwards related to stock-based compensation were recognized, the income tax benefit of those losses was accounted for as a credit to stockholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets. Beginning on January 1, 2017, we recognized such income tax benefit will be accounted for as a credit on the consolidated financial statements, of comprehensive income, as further described in the Recent accounting pronouncements section of "Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies." If not utilized, the Company’s federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire between 2020 and 2036,2037, with the majority of them expiring between 2020 and 2024. Additionally, changes in ownership, as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, may limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards used in any one year.
A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefit balances is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 21,741 |
| | $ | 18,403 |
| | $ | 18,537 |
| $ | 22,919 |
| | $ | 21,741 |
| | $ | 18,403 |
|
| Gross increases for tax positions of prior years | 331 |
| | 2,708 |
| | 126 |
| 93 |
| | 331 |
| | 2,708 |
|
| Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years | (93 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (199 | ) | (31 | ) | | (93 | ) | | (9 | ) |
| Gross increases for tax positions of current year | 997 |
| | 751 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 997 |
| | 751 |
|
| Settlements | (57 | ) | | (112 | ) | | (61 | ) | (66 | ) | | (57 | ) | | (112 | ) |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | | (290 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Balance at end of year | $ | 22,919 |
| | $ | 21,741 |
| | $ | 18,403 |
| $ | 22,625 |
| | $ | 22,919 |
| | $ | 21,741 |
|
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that could affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized was $4.5$4.2 million and $3.4$4.5 million as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The remaining $18.4 million has not been recognized on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, if recognized, would create a deferred tax asset subject to a valuation allowance. The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions, and Canada. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2012,2013, although net operating lossNOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards from any year are subject to examination and adjustment for at least three years following the year in which they
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015
are fully utilized. As of December 31, 2016,2017, no significant adjustments have been proposed relative to the Company’s tax positions.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014,2015, the Company recognized less than $0.2 million of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The Company had approximately $1.0$1.1 million and $0.8$1.0 million accrued for interest and penalties as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively.
|
| |
Note 16:17: | Net LossIncome (Loss) Per Share |
"Basic net lossincome (loss) per share" is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. "Diluted net lossincome (loss) per share" is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, vesting of unvested RSUs, and conversion or maturity of the Notes. Dilutive potential common shares are excluded from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is antidilutive.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
The computation of basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Years ended December 31, | Years ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from continuing operations | $ | (1,379 | ) | | $ | (12,726 | ) | | $ | (5,544 | ) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 29,376 |
| | $ | (1,379 | ) | | $ | (12,726 | ) |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (2,337 | ) | | (658 | ) | | — |
|
| Loss from continuing operations attributable to Blucora, Inc. | (2,037 | ) | | (12,726 | ) | | (5,544 | ) | |
| Loss from discontinued operations attributable to Blucora, Inc. | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) | | (30,003 | ) | |
| Net loss attributable to Blucora, Inc. | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) | | $ | (35,547 | ) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | 27,039 |
| | (2,037 | ) | | (12,726 | ) |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | — |
| | (63,121 | ) | | (27,348 | ) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Blucora, Inc. | | $ | 27,039 |
| | $ | (65,158 | ) | | $ | (40,074 | ) |
| Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| 44,370 |
| | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
|
| Dilutive potential common shares | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 2,841 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
| | 41,396 |
| 47,211 |
| | 41,494 |
| | 40,959 |
|
| Net loss per share attributable to Blucora, Inc.- basic: | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - basic: | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | — |
| | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) |
| Basic net loss per share | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | |
| Net loss per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | |
| Basic net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) |
| Net income (loss) per share attributable to Blucora, Inc. - diluted: | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) | | (0.73 | ) | — |
| | (1.52 | ) | | (0.67 | ) |
| Diluted net loss per share | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) | | $ | (0.86 | ) | |
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | (1.57 | ) | | $ | (0.98 | ) |
| Shares excluded | 9,774 |
| | 5,975 |
| | 5,468 |
| 1,058 |
| | 9,774 |
| | 5,975 |
|
Shares were excluded primarily related tofrom the antidilutivecomputation of diluted earnings per common share for these periods because their effect of a loss from continuing operations, stock options with an exercise price greater than the average price during the applicable periods, and awards with performance conditions not completed during the applicable periods (in 2014).
As more fully discussed in "Note 9: Debt," in March 2013, the Company issued the Notes, which are convertible and mature in April 2019. In May 2013, the Company received shareholder approval for “flexible settlement,” which provided the Company with the option to settle conversions in cash, shares of common stock, or any combination thereof. The Company intends, upon conversion or maturity of the Notes, to settle the principal in cash and satisfy any conversion premium by issuing shares of its common stock. The Company expects towould have the liquidity to satisfy conversion of the Notes' principal for cash based upon cash on hand, net cash flows from operations, and cash available through the credit facility. As a result, the Company only includes the impact of the premium feature in its dilutive potential common shares when the average stock price for the reporting period exceeds the conversion price of the Notes, which did not occur during any of the years presented.been anti-dilutive.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 20162017 to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 framework) issued by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 framework), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2017.
Ernst & Young LLP has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162017 and its report is included below.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20162017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TheTo the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Blucora, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Blucora, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Blucora, Inc.’s (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Blucora, Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes, and our report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Blucora, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Blucora, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated February 28, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNSTErnst & YOUNGYoung LLP
Seattle, WashingtonDallas, Texas
February 28, 2017March 1, 2018
ITEM 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have omitted certain information from Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We intend to file a definitive Proxy Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to our annual meeting of stockholders not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and such information is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Certain information concerning our directors required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Committees.Directors."
Certain information regarding our executive officers required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Information Regarding Executive Officers."
Other information concerning our officers and directors required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Beneficial Ownership."
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Compensation Committee Report," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," and "Compensation of Named Executive Officers."
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Beneficial Ownership" and "Equity Compensation Plans."
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the headings "Information Regarding the Board of Directors" and "Audit Committee Report."
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the heading "Audit Committee Report."
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
1. Consolidated Financial Statements
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at Item 8 of this report.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules required by Item 15(a)(2) have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibitsrequired by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report.set forth below.
(b) Exhibits
See Item 15(a) above.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | Filed Herewith |
| | Stock Purchase Agreement by an among HDV Holdings, LLC, Blucora, Inc., Project Baseball Sub, Inc. and HDV Holdings, Inc., dated October 14, 2015 | | 8-K | | October 14, 2015 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Asset Purchase Agreement between Blucora, Inc., Infospace LLC, OpenMail LLC and InfoSpace Holdings LLC dated July 1, 2016 | | 8-K | | July 5, 2016 | | 2.1 |
| | |
| | Stock Purchase Agreement between Blucora, Inc., Monoprice Holdings, Inc. and YFC-Boneagle Electric Co., LTD, dated November 14, 2016 | | 8-K | | November 15, 2016 | | 2.1 |
| | |
| | Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware on August 10, 2012 | | 8-K (No. 000-25131) | | August 13, 2012 | | 3.1 |
| | |
| | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Blucora, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on June 1, 2017 | | 8-K | | June 5, 2017 | | 3.1 |
| | |
| | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Blucora, Inc. | | 8-K | | February 28, 2017 | | 3.2 |
| | |
| | Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of June 5, 2012 | | S-8 (No. 333-198645) | | September 8, 2014 | | 99.1 |
| | |
| | Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated | | DEF 14A | | April 25, 2016 | | App-endix A |
| | |
| | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice | | 10-Q | | July 30, 2015 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice | | 10-Q | | July 30, 2015 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Executive Officers under the Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated | | 8-K | | February 23, 2018 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| | Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Officers under the Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated | | 8-K | | February 23, 2018 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Officers under the Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated | | 8-K | | February 23, 2018 | | 10.4 |
| | |
| | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement for Nonemployee Directors | | 10-Q | | April 28, 2016 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement for Nonemployee Chairman of the Board | | 10-Q | | April 28, 2016 | | 10.4 |
| | |
| | Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Award Agreement for Initial Grants to New Directors under the Amended and Restated Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan | | 10-Q | | July 27, 2017 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| | Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Award Agreement for Annual Grants to Directors under the Amended and Restated Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan | | 10-Q | | July 27, 2017 | | 10.4 |
| | |
| | Blucora, Inc. 2016 Equity Inducement Plan | | S-8 | | January 29, 2016 | | 99.1 |
| | |
| | Amendment No. 1 to Blucora, Inc. 2016 Inducement Plan | | S-8 | | October 14, 2016 | | 99.1 |
| | |
| | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2016 Inducement Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice | | 10-K | | February 24, 2016 | | 10.41 |
| | |
| | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2016 Inducement Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice | | 10-K | | February 24, 2016 | | 10.42 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Blucora, Inc. 2017 Executive Bonus Plan | | 8-K | | February 8, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Blucora, Inc. 2018 Annual Incentive Plan | | 8-K | | February 23, 2018 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and John S. Clendening dated March 12, 2016 | | 8-K | | March 15, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated September 5, 2017 between Blucora, Inc. and John S. Clendening | | 8-K | | September 5, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Sanjay Baskaran dated January 12, 2017 | | 8-K/A | | January 13, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc., HD Vest, Inc., and Robert D. Oros dated January 22, 2017 | | 8-K | | January 23, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Ann Bruder dated June 19, 2017 | | 10-Q | | July 27, 2017 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| | Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Davinder Athwal dated February 14, 2018 | | 8-K | | February 15, 2018 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 9, 2016, by and between Project Baseball Sub, Inc. and Roger Ochs | | 10-Q | | October 27, 2016 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| | Transition and Separation Agreement by and between H. D. Vest, Inc. and Roger C. Ochs dated January 22, 2017 | | 8-K | | January 23, 2017 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, amended and restated effective January 6, 2015 between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans | | 8-K | | January 22, 2015 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans dated January 22, 2016 | | 8-K | | January 22, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans dated January 6, 2015, as amended | | 10-Q | | October 27, 2016 | | 10.4 |
| | |
| | Consulting Agreement, dated October 25, 2017, between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans | | 10-Q | | October 26, 2017 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| | Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and Mark Finkelstein, dated September 30, 2014 | | 10-Q | | November 5, 2014 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and Mark A. Finkelstein dated September 30, 2014 | | 8-K | | January 22, 2016 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| | Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc., and Mark. A. Finkelstein dated September 30, 2014, as amended January 22, 2016 | | 10-Q | | October 27, 2016 | | 10.5 |
| | |
| | Credit Agreement, dated May 22, 2017, among Blucora, Inc., as borrower, and most of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, as guarantors, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and each lender from time to time a party to the Credit Agreement | | 8-K | | May 23, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | First Amendment, dated November 28, 2017, among Blucora, Inc., as borrower, and most of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, as guarantors, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and each lender party to the First Amendment | | 8-K | | November 29, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Office Lease between Blucora, Inc. and Plaza Center Property LLC dated July 19, 2012 | | 10-Q (No. 000-25131) | | November 1, 2012 | | 10.2 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First Amendment to Office Lease between Blucora, Inc. and Plaza Center Property LLC dated November 5, 2013 | | 10-K | | February 27, 2014 | | 10.8 |
| | |
| | Sublease dated April 13, 2017, by and between Blucora, Inc. and Xevo, Inc. related to that certain Office Lease dated July 13, 2012 by and between Blucora, Inc. and KBS SOR Plaza Bellevue, LLC (as successor to Plaza Property Center LLC) | | 10-Q | | May 4, 2017 | | 10.5 |
| | |
| | Lease Agreement, dated January 28, 2008, by and between 2nd Story Software, Inc., PBI Properties, Larry Kane Investments, L.C., and Swati Dandekar for office space located at 1425 60th Street NE, Suite 300, Cedar Rapids, Iowa | | 10-K (No. 000-25131) | | March 9, 2012 | | 10.13 |
| | |
| | Amendment to Lease Agreement by and between 2nd Story Software, Inc., PBI Properties, Larry Kane Investments, L.C., and Swati Dandekar for office space located at 1425 60th Street NE, Suite 300, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, dated March 14, 2013 | | 10-Q | | May 2, 2013 | | 10.5 |
| | |
| | Blucora, Inc., 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | DEF 14A | | April 25, 2016 | | App-endix B |
| | |
| | Blucora, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy | | 8-K | | June 5, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| | Subsidiaries of the registrant | | | | | | | | X |
| | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | | | | | | X |
| | Power of Attorney (contained on the signature page hereto) | | | | | | | | X |
| | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| 101 | | The following financial statements from the Company’s 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | | | | | | | X |
|
| | |
| * | | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| # | | Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Blucora, Inc. hereby undertakes to furnish supplemental copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| | |
(c) Financial Statements and Schedules
See Item 15(a) above.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| | BLUCORA, INC. |
| | | |
| | By: | /s/ John S. Clendening |
| | | John S. Clendening Chief Executive Officer and President |
| | | |
| | Date: | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Eric M. EmansDavinder Athwal and Mark A. Finkelstein,Ann J. Bruder, jointly and severally, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities to execute any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | |
| Signature | | Title | Date |
| | | | |
| /s/ John S. Clendening | | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
| John S. Clendening | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Eric M. EmansDavinder Athwal | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
Eric M. EmansDavinder Athwal | | |
| | | | |
/s/ John E. Cunningham, IVPalmer | | Vice President - Accounting (Principal Accounting Officer) | March 1, 2018 |
| John Palmer | | |
| | | |
| /s/ William L. Atwell | | Chairman and Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
John E. Cunningham, IVWilliam L. Atwell | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ David H. S. ChungSteven Aldrich | | Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
David H. S. ChungSteven Aldrich | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Lance G. Dunn | | Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
| Lance G. Dunn | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Steven W. HooperH. McIntyre Gardner | | Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
Steven W. HooperH. McIntyre Gardner | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Elizabeth J. HuebnerGeorganne C. Proctor | | Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
Elizabeth J. Huebner | | | |
| | | |
/s/ Andrew M. Snyder | | Director | February 28, 2017 |
Andrew M. SnyderGeorganne C. Proctor | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Christopher W. Walters | | Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
| Christopher W. Walters | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Mary S. Zappone | | Director | February 28, 2017March 1, 2018 |
| Mary S. Zappone | | | |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 2.1 | | Stock Purchase Agreement between Blucora, Inc., Monoprice, Inc., and the Shareholders, dated as of July 31, 2013 | | 8-K | | August 1, 2013 | | 2.1 |
| | |
| 2.2 | | Asset Purchase Agreement between Blucora, Inc., Infospace LLC, OpenMail LLC and InfoSpace Holdings LLC dated July 1, 2016 | | 8-K | | July 5, 2016 | | 2.1 |
| | |
| 3.1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware on August 10, 2012 | | 8-K | | August 13, 2012 | | 3.1 |
| | |
| 3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Blucora, Inc., dated August 8, 2013 | | 8-K | | August 14, 2013 | | 3.1 |
| | |
| 4.1 | | Indenture dated as of March 15, 2013 by and between Blucora, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee | | 8-K | | March 15, 2013 | | 4.1 |
| | |
| 4.2 | | Form of 4.25% Convertible Senior Note due 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.1) | | 8-K | | March 15, 2013 | | 4.2 |
| | |
| 10.1* | | 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | S-1 (No. 333-62323), as amended | | August 27, 1998 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| 10.2* | | Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of June 5, 2012 | | S-8 (No. 333-198645) | | September 8, 2014 | | 99.1 |
| | |
| 10.3* | | Form of Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Letter Agreement for Nonemployee Directors | | S-8 (No. 333-169691) | | September 30, 2010 | | 4.5 |
| | |
| 10.4* | | Form of Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Letter Agreement for Vice Presidents and Above | | S-8 (No. 333-169691) | | September 30, 2010 | | 4.6 |
| | |
| 10.5* | | Form of Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Nonemployee Directors | | S-8 (No. 333-169691) | | September 30, 2010 | | 4.8 |
| | |
| 10.6* | | Form of Restated 1996 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Vice Presidents and Above | | S-8 (No. 333-169691) | | September 30, 2010 | | 4.9 |
| | |
| 10.7 | | Office Lease between Blucora, Inc. and Plaza Center Property LLC dated July 19, 2012 | | 10-Q | | November 1, 2012 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| 10.8 | | First Amendment to Office Lease between Blucora, Inc. and Plaza Center Property LLC dated November 5, 2013 | | 10-K | | February 27, 2014 | | 10.8 |
| | |
| 10.9 | | Lease Agreement, dated January 28, 2008, by and between 2nd Story Software, Inc., PBI Properties, Larry Kane Investments, L.C., and Swati Dandekar for office space located at 1425 60th Street NE, Suite 300, Cedar Rapids, Iowa | | 10-K | | March 9, 2012 | | 10.13 |
| | |
| 10.10 | | Amendment to Lease Agreement by and between 2nd Story Software, Inc., PBI Properties, Larry Kane Investments, L.C., and Swati Dandekar for office space located at 1425 60th Street NE, Suite 300, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, dated March 14, 2013 | | 10-Q | | May 2, 2013 | | 10.5 |
| | |
| 10.11* | | Form of Indemnification Agreement between the registrant and each of its directors and executive officers | | 8-K | | April 13, 2011 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| 10.12* | | Blucora 2016 Executive Bonus Plan | | 10-K | | February 24, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| 10.13* | | Blucora 2017 Executive Bonus Plan | | 8-K | | February 8, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit
Number
| | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit
Number
| | Filed
Herewith
|
10.14* | | Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and John S. Clendening dated March 12, 2016 | | 8-K | | March 15, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.15* | | Consulting Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and William J. Ruckelshaus dated March 12, 2016 | | 8-K | | March 15, 2016 | | 10.2 |
| | |
10.16* | | Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 9, 2016, by and between Project Baseball Sub, Inc. and Roger Ochs | | 10-Q | | October 27, 2016 | | 10.3 |
| | |
10.17* | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, amended and restated effective January 6, 2015 between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans | | 8-K | | January 22, 2015 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.18* | | Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans dated January 22, 2016 | | 8-K | | January 22, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.19* | | Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Eric M. Emans dated January 6, 2015, as amended | | 10-Q | | October 27, 2016 | | 10.4 |
| | |
10.20* | | Employment Agreement dated between Blucora, Inc., Monoprice, Inc., and Bernard Luthi dated July 14, 2014 | | 10-Q | | November 5, 2014 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.21* | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated July 14, 2014 between Blucora, Inc., Monoprice, Inc., and Bernard Luthi | | 8-K | | January 22, 2016 | | 10.4 |
| | |
10.22* | | Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated July 14, 2014 between Blucora, Inc., Monoprice, Inc., and Bernard Luthi, as amended January 22, 2016 | | 8-K | | November 15, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.23* | | Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and Mark Finkelstein, dated September 30, 2014 | | 10-Q | | November 5, 2014 | | 10.3 |
| | |
10.24* | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc. and Mark A. Finkelstein dated September 30, 2014 | | 8-K | | January 22, 2016 | | 10.2 |
| | |
10.25* | | Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc., and Mark. A. Finkelstein dated September 30, 2014, as amended January 22, 2016 | | 10-Q | | October 27, 2016 | | 10.5 |
| | |
10.26* | | Employment Agreement between Blucora, Inc., InfoSpace LLC, and Peter Mansour, dated October 6, 2014 | | 10-Q | | November 5, 2014 | | 10.4 |
| | |
10.27* | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated October 6, 2014 between Blucora, Inc., Infospace LLC and Peter Mansour | | 8-K | | January 22, 2016 | | 10.30 |
| | |
10.28* | | Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated October 6, 2014, as amended January 22, 2016 between Blucora, Inc., Infospace LLC and Peter Mansour | | 8-K | | July 5, 2016 | | 10.10 |
| | |
10.29* | | Employment Agreement between JoAnn Kintzel, TaxAct, Inc., and Company dated January 31, 2015 | | 8-K | | February 4, 2015 | | 10.10 |
| | |
10.30* | | Transition, Separation and Release Agreement dated June 29, 2016 between JoAnn Kintzel, Blucora, Inc. and TaxAct, Inc. | | 8-K | | July 1, 2016 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.31* | | Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc. and Sanjay Baskaran dated January 12, 2017 | | 8-K/A | | January 13, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
10.32* | | Employment Agreement by and between Blucora, Inc., HD Vest, Inc., and Robert D. Oros dated January 22, 2017 | | 8-K | | January 23, 2017 | | 10.1 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 10.33* | | Transition and Separation Agreement by and between H. D. Vest, Inc. and Roger C. Ochs dated January 22, 2017 | | 8-K | | January 23, 2017 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| 10.34 | | Stockholder Agreement between Company and Cambridge Information Group I LLC, dated August 23, 2011 | | 8-K | | August 23, 2011 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| 10.35 | | Credit Agreement among TaxAct, Inc., as Borrower, TaxAct Holdings, Inc., as a Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and a lender, BMO Harris Bank, N.A., Silicon Valley Bank, Bank of America, N.A., and RBS Citizens, N.A., each as lenders, dated August 30, 2013 | | 8-K | | September 6, 2013
| | 10.1 |
| | |
| 10.36* | | Nonemployee Director Compensation Policy, effective as of January 1, 2014 | | 10-K | | February 27, 2014 | | 10.42 |
| | |
| 10.37* | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement for Nonemployee Directors | | 10-Q | | April 28, 2016 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| 10.38* | | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement for Nonemployee Chairman of the Board | | 10-Q | | April 28, 2016 | | 10.4 |
| | |
| 10.39* | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Agreement for Nonemployee Directors | | 10-Q | | April 28, 2016 | | 10.5 |
| | |
| 10.40* | | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Agreement for Nonemployee Chairman of the Board | | 10-Q | | April 28, 2016 | | 10.6 |
| | |
| 10.41* | | Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated | | S-8 | | May 25, 2016 | | 99.2 |
| | |
| 10.42* | | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice | | 10-Q | | July 30, 2015 | | 10.2 |
| | |
| 10.43* | | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice | | 10-Q | | July 30, 2015 | | 10.3 |
| | |
| 10.44* | | Blucora, Inc. 2016 Equity Inducement Plan | | S-8 | | January 29, 2016 | | 99.1 |
| | |
| 10.45* | | Amendment No. 1 to Blucora, Inc. 2016 Inducement Plan | | S-8 | | October 14, 2016 | | 99.1 |
| | |
| 10.46* | | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2016 Inducement Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice | | 10-K | | February 24, 2016 | | 10.41 |
| | |
| 10.47* | | Form of Blucora, Inc. 2016 Inducement Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice | | 10-K | | February 24, 2016 | | 10.42 |
| | |
| 10.48* | | Blucora, Inc., 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | S-8 | | May 25, 2016 | | 99.20 |
| | |
| 10.49 | | Stock Purchase Agreement by an among HDV Holdings, LLC, Blucora, Inc., Project Baseball Sub, Inc. and HDV Holdings, Inc., dated October 14, 2015 | | 8-K | | October 14, 2015 | | 10.1 |
| | |
| 10.50 | | Credit Agreement among TaxAct Holdings, Inc., TaxAct, Inc., HD Vest, Inc. and Bank of Montreal as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Swing Line Lender, and each lender from time to time a party to the Credit Agreement, dated December 31, 2015 | | 10-K | | February 24, 2016 | | 10.49 |
| | |
| 14.1 | | Code of Ethics and Conduct, as amended on August 14, 2014 | | 8-K | | August 15, 2014 | | 14.1 |
| | |
| 21.1 | | Subsidiaries of the registrant | | | | | | | | X |
| 23.1 | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | | | | | | X |
| 24.1 | | Power of Attorney (contained on the signature page hereto) | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit
Number
| | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit
Number
| | Filed
Herewith
|
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
32.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
101 | | The following financial statements from the Company’s 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | | | | | | | X |
|
| | |
* | | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| | |
| | |